Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars could arguably change the future. Google has been working with semi-autonomous cars since 2009, and these new innovations could potentially solve an environmental crisis here on Earth. Unfortunately, many people think that if a car drove itself, it would be a danger to others on the road and to the driver as well. In many states, even testing these cars is banned. Are driverless cars dangerous enough to merit controversy?

It's no doubt that driverless cars would be beneficial to our environment since they use half the fuel of a regular vehicle, and there is no reason why we should ever be so afraid of change that we won't permit the research of a potentionally world-changing invention. Surely testing driverless cars is not without it's dangers, but the benefits that we would reap as a result are nothing less than a necessity, especially since the driver is always in control of the vehicle. Google is working on a car that will drive itself and also alert the driver if the car was about to wreck. If America is about promoting anything, it's saftey, and it's no lie that anything this monumental would be set in stone without the proper precautions being taken.

America is taking part in an advancing technological revolution, but the earth is deteriorating as a result. The constant burning of fossil fuels and the invading of natural resources for materialistic goods are pushing our planet to the brink. In times like these, we need to seize opportunity and take action before our only home in the cosmos is reduced to a regurgitated wasteland of the earth's unusable resources. With driverless cars in our near future, we'll be able to create a fully-autonomous public transportation taxi system with no need for personal cars. It's important for us to care about and care for the planet because if we don't, who will?

Score: 3