Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author supports his idea well because, he brought up the claim that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it present, because Venus is not only a planet but also a twin to earth, which means that we humans can live on there, if there was to be a evolutionary or global breakout on the earth and meteors were to destroy earth and extinct everything the second time, we would have somewhere to go, so it is worth a chance for our survival and not only our survival, maybe theres an overpopulation in all the countries, instead of killing kids or to put them to cryo sleep or stop adults from having more kids they could go to venus. The author already said in paragraph 5 it says that " The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study venus."

They dont need to force people to go, but to ask for volunteers, and they don't need to have intelligent to go to venus or even be experience they just need to be able to bring samples like the rocks, the dirt, the water, the plants. So that they could bring it back and we could experiment on them, is the water edible, is the rock acidic or poisinous, can the dirt be used for agricultural things. It says in paragragh 6 " more importantly, researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas or anything else, from a distance", so they would need humans to go and examine this things, so it is a worthy pursuit despite the danger, because we should think about what it brings to the table not what it takes away.

Score: 3