Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Should the creation of driverless cars be allowed? I think they should create these cars but not have any sort be realesed until they are safe and the company is held relyable if errors go wrong when using the driverless car. Also they should be created because if you are serverly sick or injured you could have your care drive you to the hospital, & because people who are driving under the influence of something wouldnt be likely to crash. But what if someone is drunk and the "driverless car'' crashes, whos to blame?

Tesla said that in 2016 they will have a car that can drive 90 percent of the time, That is a good start in my opinion because 90 percent only leaves you 10 percent, thats 1/10 of the time you have to be paying attention. But i feel like people would abuse this, & get reckless and crash in that 10 percent. Even though they crash they would still want the compant to be reliable right? but is that fair? No, your paying for only 90 percent driverless that other 10 prcent depends on you, it does because its only 90 and not 100 percent.

I believe the self driving care should be created and sold but.

But it shouldnt be sold until it is 100 percent safe and driverless. I believe all this because if the company says it can drive 99 percent of the time, if you would happen to crash what would the company say? well we only said 99 percent and you crashed during that 1 percent so were suing you. What im tring to say here is why make the world worse by making something only a half product? Why not realese it when it is 100 percent and people who want to spend alot of money for a car that can drive them then put them on the market not when they can only drive "90 percent" of the time.

Score: 3