Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars aren't completly driverless, they could malufunction, and so far, seems to be expensive. Cars that can drive themselves are bad or just plain pointless.

First, driverless cars aren't even fully driverless yet. Seems like this cars can't do much by themselves, as said by BMW in paragraph 7 when the say " ...None of these cars developed are completely driverless...Designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requries human skills...This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requries". This means that you could be in danger of your car not alerting you quick enough or not at all. Which obviously would be dangerous.

Secondly, they could malufunction. These cars radar could stop working, not let you take control, or alert you at serious times. But the biggest problem is that if someone is injured. "If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault - the driver or the manufacturer". This is asked in paragraph 9 and is most likely to be the biggest problem with these driverless cars.

Third, they seem to be just too expensive for the average consumer to buy. Look in paragraph 4 it says that "Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position estimating sensors,... A rotating sensor on the roof,... A video camera,... Four automative radar sensors,... Gps reciever,... Uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-d model of the car's surroundings". Seems very expensive once you name what you need for this car to work, and most will not pay for all of those things to get the driverless car to work, plus the car.

so if the cars aren't completly driverless, they could possibly malufunction and cause serious issues, and most likely will be highly expensive, just makes the driverless car seem like an extremely bad idea and possibly pointless.

Score: 3