Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I disagree, there should not be andy driverless cars in the future. This is because if there were to be an accident and the car were driverless it were to be on the manufactures and that would mean that the cars were not as safe as it guarenties.

Therefore that would lead to many recless mistakes and companies would lose money which would intintionally lead to not enough funds to fix and make sure that the cars will be safer.

Also, If a car were driverless how would it know the correct and incorrect way to drive without a drivers experience and skill? That would lead to a greater amount of accidents because the car may not know the right way to drive in different countries or cities.

Would the car have to be programmed with all the worlds driving techniques and rules? Not all states and countries have the same laws and road rules, wouldnt the manufactuers have to be able to program all of the worlds rules and techniques to beable to make it safer also? Not all companies will be able to get a hold on all the tech and programing for that so not all of the cars will be able to drive in different places and states because the car would become disfunctional.

Also

there is always the risk of an accident weither the car is driverless or not so therefore the statement of a driverless

car is indeed false advertisement, it is even more false because the driver will not be in control to prevent the accident if one were to happen.

Would it be safer for the enviorment? If driverless cars were to be invented would there be a lot more factories and bussinises opening?

Thata would not be safe for the enviorment because the factories would cause pollution and more trees and forests would have to be torn down in order to creat more bussinises.

Therefore creating a driverless car would be a bad idea at least until it has better and safer ground to be to the attention of the people.

Score: 3