Rate the following argument fragment on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Evidence: "Driverless cars" at the time seem to already struggle with the navigation and attention of the driver to prevent accidents from occuring. As stated by the article, " This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires." Driverless cars today aren't all that beneficial and requiredue the attention of drivers, how can we be positive that the new cars said to come will be ready to prevent accidents without the requirence of human attention? Not only do these cars seem to be safeless, but due to all that worl that is said to come and all the new technology, dont they seem expensive and out of reach?

Score: 2