Rate the following argument fragment on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Evidence: Most states have a "winner-take-all" system, that awards all electors to the winning presidential canidate, but what if the people didn't want that candiate? Why should he get our way of speaking to the government? How are we even sure that he didn't elect himself? Also canidates don't spend time in the states they know they will have a chance of winning because of biasim. They mainly focus on the tight races in the "swing" states.

Score: 1