Rate the following argument fragment on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Evidence: 1) Certainty of outcome:

Disputes are possible but very unlikely to happen. There are a total of 538 million votes. So its very easy for there to be a landslide of a vote.

"In 2012's election Obama received 61.7 percent of the electoral vote compared to only 51.3 percent of the popular votes cast for him and Romney recieved all the basis."

2) Everyone's President:

One region (south, northeast, etc.) does not have enough votes to elect a president. In saying that no favorite candidate recieves any electoral votes just because he increased his plurality in states that for a fact he can win in.

3) Swing States:

The winner-take-all method shows the candidates that they should pay attention to the toss-up states. These states will pay very close attention to the candidates campaign, showing that they need to focus on their campaigns. The toss-up states are more likely to be the thoughtful voters and the most thoughtful votes should decide the election.

4) Big States:

"A large state gets more attention from presidental candidates in a campaign than a small state does"

5) Avoid Run-Off Elections:

The electoral college avoids having an election in which no candidate recieves the majority of the votes.

Score: 1