Rate the following argument fragment on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Evidence: Although someone won the popular vote portion of the election, they [the canidate] could still lose the election at the electoral portion. The electoral portion of the election is where the elected representatives go and vote for the president again and have a final deciding vote. Even with this prestegous process sometimes there are instenses were the "underdog" wins the electoral votes and

NOT

the popular votes. Although these instenses are little to non-exsitent.

"But each party selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the party's nominee (and that is rarely betrayed)... [;however,] it is entirely possible that the winer of the electoral vote will not win the national popular vote. Yet that as happened very rarley. It happened in2000, when Gore had more popukar votes than Bush yet fewer electoral votes, but that was the first time since 1888."

source three:

In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President by Richard A. Posner

Score: 1