Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
My position on driverless cars is that they shouldn't exist. I think this because technology can have so many issues and it could cause so many accidents. Even though technology gets better and better every year they always have problems and people are always having to fix it.

In paragraph nine the passage states that the law is trying to make things safe and the safest way to things like this is that a human is alert at all times, taking charge of the road. That already tells you we shouldn't have these type of cars because with something not going right or working with the google in the car, you never know what can happen. Sensors don't always see everything or feel everything so it could always lose its signal or something. Lastly what if one day the google isn't connecting again, and the antilock brakes aren't working. You aren't paying attention and boom you run into something and for all we know you could lose your life.

The point that i'm trying to get across here is that making these google cars is very pointless. If you want things to be safer and better, than they shouldn't be created. Sure humans driving isn't the safest, but the way i look at it verse google cars humans make it safer.

Score: 2