Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
We all have an imagination, do we not? The people in 1976 had an imagination. I think the "Face on Mars" is just a regular landform. I think the face is a landform, because they don't have any proof of life on mars, it couldn't have been a Martian mesa, and with or without clouds, the face was not seen again. Even if it was to been seen again, we do not know if would be a shadow or a actual mesa.

First off, the Face on Mars doesn't have a lot of backup proof about it. The article says that in 1976, Viking 1 was orbiting around mars, when it snapped a photo of a shadowy likeness of a face. That is just it, a shadowy likeness of the face on Mars. We do not know if it is a mesa or not unless we actually scim the face of the landform I see, in my opinion.

Next, it couldn't be a Martian mesa. If their was any source of life besides the ice caps Mars has, there is no remains of people or any housing or animal life anywhere.Without this life on Mars, the mesa would be impossible to build on Mars, making it just a landform.Like the article states, "So, if their were objects on the ground like airplanes or egyptian-style pyramids... you could see what they were!"

Lastly, even in a couldy situation or not, we never saw the face again! In 1976, the camera might have just made the landform look fuzzy. After the two pictures NASA took in 1998 and 2001, their was never any outline of a face or anything anymore. It was just a bunch of landform shaped like a regular mountain.

To conculde, the face on Mars was just a landform. We know this through the fact that it could not have been built without population, in a couldy situation or not we never seen it again, and it couldn't of been a martian mesa. I think people got to carried away by the fact that there would ever be life on mars. We never fully know yet, but in my opinion, the face on Mars is just a landform.

Score: 3