Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
How so you feel about being constantly seen and recoded through your personal device. If Facial Action Coding System also known as FACS was to be put on every phone and computer it wil remove the idea of privacy. We as people really don't have privacy as much and with FACS it will complety be taken away. This is an idea that shouldn't be approved. It always states with an education excuse and then they find another reason on why everyone shoukd have it.

The use of technology to be able to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not a valuable idea: there will be no saftey for kids anymore. this will give the government to take over out personal devices, and our privacy will be taken away.

The use of technology to read emotions thought computers

will not be safe for our kids anymore. This is becuase inappropiate things can come up on the screen that kids shouldn't be looking at, as well as they can be looking at the students. In the text it states, "A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,” Dr. Huang predicts. “Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.” The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive—for video games or video surgery." This seems like a very good idea but if you really thing about it, how will you know when the FACS is turned off or on and lets say that student goes to the bathroom with their ipad, does that mean they will be looking at them. Even if its used for classroom use, they will still go home and do homework which means that FACS will be there.

With the use of FACS for classrooms the government will take

over our devices. The reason this will happen is becuase it will be use for "classroom use only" and lets say we are using our personal device at school for an assingment then that means they might bloke out certain websites because we are at school. In the text it staes, " Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,” notes Dr. Huang. “So computers need to understand that, too.” This means that they want compters to find a way to communitcate with you, but by this they will have to see what you are doing, as well as something to be there watch the FACS. This will give the government more access to what people are doing by FACS. The government always find a way to look at people with out them knowing and with this it will give them an easier access.

Lastly, our privacy will be completly removed by using technology to read our emotions. This is because there will be people that try to hack in and see what people are doing. They already say that people can see us from our cameras of our devices and this way it will be easier since its a syetem that has been created to see our faces. In the text it staes, " Using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements." By this they will using it for any reason. It will first start with an education use and then it will move on to more becuase they will find a way to track us. Lets say you are changing and you computer is on, that will mean they might be looking at you as well. It's not really about the idea of facial emotional reader but the fact that there will be someone behind that FACS that will be looking at everyone. As well as we would know how much they will be seeing.

So no, the use of technology reading emotion expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable because of the government, the students privacy, and privacy in general. This is becuase it never comes done to only sudents in classrooms or only an emotion reader, there is alway something else behind it. You should wait for your pricacy to be taken away, you should do something to prevent it from being taken away.

Score: 4