Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Throughout history, advanced technology is what everyone shoots for. However, advanced technology has caused many problems, as it has also been effective.

There are certain things "man" should control themselves; automotives is one. Yes, a assemly line is much more easier than carrying heavy things to where they need to be, but completely removing a person from an object that can easily end a life is not only lazy, but abserb. Us as humans were given one specifc thing that seperates us from everything else; a brain.

As stated in the prompt, if an accident occurs, who will be held responsible? The driver "behind the wheel" or the robot that is controlling the vehicle? The car may have an overide system, but a human will not be able to react quick enough in that split second in the chaos that the robot has created.

There are, however, certain things robots will thrive in that humans don't. For instance, a "whiskey throttle". This is when a human panics and gets a heavy foot, which causes an accident that was not intended. Robots do not panic, therefore, they will not rear-end the car ahead of them.

I am all with saftey, but letting a robot have complete and total control over a car is not one of them. I disagree with driverless cars.

Score: 2