Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In this argumentitive essay I am going to prove to you that this "face" is not a face but is a natuaral landform. When Nasa had first sent the Viking 1 out to space to photograph the planets "face" it had not very good cameras. This led to people like conspiricay theorists to believe that nasa had covered up the "face" and its proof of aliens as said in this qoute. " evidence that Nasa would rather hide from the public, says conspiracy theorists. the truth

is that nasa would have liked the proof of aliens because it would have made a huge boost in profit.

The second ship that nasa sent had the picture take in the winter on a cloudy martian day. This made people skeptical t believe nasa when the said that the face is not a face. This made nasa take another ship to the red planet and take photographs in the summer on a clear day.

The third and final ship sent was sent in 2001

had finaly proven to most people that this was indeed not a face. This did not shoot down the conspiricy theorists for they still believe that the face is

a face not

natural land form. This is proven in the last paragraph for the fact that they did not say if all people thought that it was a face or not a face. Also nasa could have changed the photos look with a bluring effect so that could have made it so

that it did not look like a face.

So in conclusion, all in all there is more evidence to discurage a face then there is to confirm it.

Score: 2