Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Does the author of "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" really support the exploration of Venus? The facts and the reasoning in the authors article shows strong supporting details that they in fact want to explore Venus.

So therefore, in paragraph 4. The text states,"astronomers are fascinated by venus becuase it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth", the author is stating how Venus might be able to save us in the near future. For example, if a natural disaster happened and human kind was in danger, where would we go? As the author states Venus is very similar to Earth, if we do the reasearch and get the materials to be able to live on Venus it could ultimately save the human race.

Also, there are still some downfalls about Venus's condictions, in paragraph 6 it states, "peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmoshpere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective.". This is the author giving evidence that there are still complications to be fully awhere on what is on Venus, there could be a possibility that Venus is inhabitible.

In conclusion, yes, the author does support the exploration of Venus. The author gives many reasons why we should and why it is more than likely be a planetary visit. Even though there is many downfalls about Venus it could possibly be very helpful in the near future.

Score: 3