Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In this story the author suggests that studying venus is a worthy to explore despite the dangers it presents. it tells us that Venus was "Once been most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life." Also that Venus has "familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and creaters." But despite the belife that life was there, it's also that NASA and others are just curios of what they could find from Venus.

First, the author did a good job pointing out and bringing in the reader with Venus "once have been most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago" but he also goes and continues on how it was covered with "oceans"

Secondly, the author tell's us that there are "familiar features such as valleys, moutains, and craters" On Venus. This makes us want to pursuit the study on Venus despite the dangers it presents. Even with all the critical coditions Venus has, this example want's us to go and visit Venus.

Lastly, " Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because of human curiosity." Human curiosity makes us want to go to Venus and see what we can find and look. Most humans are very curios and when they find out there was once life in Venus, it makes us want to go and see what's out there. The author put this in to give us another reason why we should go out to Venus. He puts in "human cruiosity" to bring us in.

Finaly, from all of the eight paragraps I feel as if the author could have done a better job on their part to explain why it's "worth pursuit despite the dangers it presents." Also that the comparison between Earth and Venus was fine. But going to Venus and exploring and pointed out that there was once life in Venus gives a good example of going and exploring Venus.

Score: 3