Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I am against driverless cars, because it could dangerous. Like it said in paragraph eight "wouldn't drivers get bored waiting on their turn to drive?" The answer is yes the driver would get bored. Once the driver got bored he or she could potentally take their eyes off of the road. If he or she did take his or her eyes off of the road and the car didn't detect something that needed to be handled by the actual driver things could become extreamly dangerous.

Another thing that could be potentally dangerous is what if the driverless car malfunctions and the actual driver didn't know? In the passage in paragraph two it says "google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009." It also says " their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash." Although they haven't had a crash yet it could happen. And when it does happen who is to blame?

In paragraph nine there is a really good question. It says " if the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?" If you were to answer the question of who is at fault many would say the driver is at fault, but others would say that the manufacturer is at fault in this situation. In my opion both would be at fault. Why you may ask, because it was both of their faults. The manufacturer might not have checked everything before he or she sent it off to be bought. The driver is at fault here too because he or she might not have been paying attention to his or her surroundings. In the passage in many paragraphs it says that the driver could take control. If the driver was paying attention he or she could have possibly prevented the accident. In colclusion that is why I am against dreverless cars.

Score: 3