Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The claim I will be making today is that I do not agree that the usage of the Facial Action Coding System is valuable to students in a classroom. I do not think students will use this kind of technology unless they are leaning towards a certain career area. On a normal day at school you won't use this technology because we will be focused on more important things such as math,science, english, and foreign languages. In paragraph 1 it talks about how in the Mona Lisa pictiure she is 83% happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful,and 2 percent angry.

Yes the Facial Action Coding System can be useful but in the classof art, kids using the Facial Action Coding System in a classroom is very unlikely to me. I think that students will not use this in everyday life. In a school that isn't an arts school does not need this kind of technology. In pargraph 4 the article says "The facial expressions for each emtional are universal " but I do not agree with that . You can put a smile on your face and the Facial Action Coding System will detect that you're happy because it's based on what your muscels are forming. In a classroom that kind of technology is not going to be used very often. In paragraph 5 it says " you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face " which is true. You don't need to go out of your way and take a picture or draw someone just to describe and give an exact percent of what they are feeling. Just ask them if they are okay and let them know you are there, you don't need to know exactly how they feel from a system of facial coding.

In conclusion I feel that this type of software will not be needed in the classroom because there is no use to it and it will not teach students many things such as our basic subjects do. Us students will not find the usage of this Facial Action Coding System useful unless we are in a certain career path.

Score: 3