Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The subject of Mona Lisa feels 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.

This conclusion was drawn from a new computer software that can recognize emotions.

While that's a pretty awesome example of what this technology can do, there's the lingering question of if this technology should be used in classrooms.

While it could read emotions to decide if lessons need to be easier, there are more cons to this technology than pros.

Therefore, this technology is not valuable enough to be used in classroom with students because humans have more complex emotions that can't be explained with six emotions, teachers are already in classrooms to assess these emotions, and this technology is just not practical enough yet.

First of all, the new emotion-reading technology cannot read enough emotions to be valuably used in classrooms.

The article stated that the software can only recognize happiness, surprise, disgust, fear, and sadness.

How can a software only recognizing six emotions effectively judge if a student is struggling in class.

Humans have more complex emotions than what can be defined through different percetages of just six emotions.

Also, struggles bring upon different emotions in humans depending on how someone takes that struggle.

Some people may feel confused, while others will be indifferent and just move on.

While this software can't even recognize these complex emotions, how will it effectively assess someone's feelings of confusion in class?

Secondly, classrooms are composed of a teacher and students.

The teacher is there to carefully assess the learning of the students and adjust the pace of the course.

Teachers can read emotions of students better than computers because they are human just like the students are humans.

Humans can relate, recognize, and comprehend other people's feelings better than a computer software. Also, having difficulties understanding new ideas is part of the learning process.

When one does not understand, they go to their teacher for help.

This helps students learn how to form relationships with other people including their teachers.

If a computer analyzes how a student feels and adjusts the lesson, the students will never learn the valuable lesson of how to face struggles and overcome them with help from other people like teachers.

Lastly, this technology is not developed enough yet to be valuable to use in a classroom.

The article stated that a home PC can not handle the complex algorithims of the software. If a home PC can't handle it, the laptops at schools probably can not either.

It would be quite costly to implicate this software into the educational system making it lose its value.

The high cost is not overweighed by the outcome, so it is not practical enough.

In conclusion, the emotion-recognizing software is not valuable enough to be used in classrooms.

The software can not recognize complex emotions, teachers are already there to find these emotions and adjust the lessons, and it is not cost-effective to implement this technology in classrooms.

While emotion-recognizing software is a great leap forward in technology, it is just not valuable enough to use in classrooms yet.

Score: 4