Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The NASA and I think that the face on Mars is just a natural landfrom. In some history people believed that aliens are real. Most still do, but the face that had happeared on Mars is just a natural landfrom.

In the text it states that "NASA's Vicking 1 spacecraft was circling the planet, snapping photos of possible landing sites for it's siter Vicking 2, when it had spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face." Now if the human face object was created by aliens then we would have of seen some kind of evidence that they would have left behind.

"Thousand of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing...a natural landfrom". The website could have of not been shown to the public, but the NASA wanted the people to know that their was no aliens involved in "the Face monument". Now their might of had been some kind of evidence that their was aliens their. The camera would have caught something even if it was cloudy at the red planet. Technology has gotten alot better the past 25 years so we would have of seen some kind of shape of evidence.

That the results have been made their was not any aliens involved in the human face shaped object. Landforms are really common on any planets, American West had a river plain that connected to Idaho. The river was not involved with any aliens in it but if we take a picture of Mars, and find a face does it have to be an alien monument?

Score: 3