Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I think that we should not have driverless cars. For example you have to be very concitraed to do this. Two it would take a lot more money they would be more expinsive due to that they are a new and better product.

There not 100% sure that it will keep you safe. If something happen then they maybe wont take the resonsabitily for what happen. They would use the contract that you had made with them to get out of this.

"District of Columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi-autonomous cars; manufacturers believe that more states will follow as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe. Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault—the driver or the manufacturer?"

Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars. Even California, Nevada, Florida, they think that you should have humans drive in sted of some type of robot. Even if they did

allowed it they wont know if there is someone going to be there or crossing the rode and if that person get hurt you are the one they will be suwing and not the compony.

I do like the idea of a car that can drive it self but i also dont agree with it because one reason it is good is like if you had a long day and you just want to go hame the car can drive you there when you set the (GPS) to do so. A bad reason we should not have it is what if its driving you home at night and a kid is playing and his toy goys out in the street and the car hits him and you didnt know it. All the car will do is keep going like you wanted it to. Then you will end up going to jail because you didnt know what was going on but yet still you killed

a kid without even knowing.

Score: 2