Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In " The Challenge of Exporing Venus " the author states Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents, it is also true although Venus might be dangerous it is worth it. Venus is worth the trouble to study. I say this because the article states, " Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system", which means that it is worth it because once upon a time it was life and maybe it can be again. Venus is worth the risk because what earth is not the only planet that have life. Venus has valleys, moutains, and craters. Venus has the resources that may one day a human can live there.

Earth has only been the planet that has been declared as life and human-living. What if theirs another one wouldn't people want to know? Some people wants to go beyond Earth, see for themselves how it feel to be on another plantet besides Earth. Venus shows some of the same features as Earth like the article states. The article says " Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit " meaning you their is a possiblity you can go there. Venus is Earth twin well if that's it why are we not going to study it like it's Earth.

All im saying is maybe one day if earth every end we can go to Venus maybe not

alive for long but its a option. How are we going to know if nobody ever studies it?We are never going to know because it's "dangerous" but what if people get to go and study it, maybe its more life! Studying Venus will only danger the ones that are not willing to live on day.

Score: 3