Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I agree that is is a piece of landform. I agree because of what NASA is saying. I agree with them for what they have said in paragraph 7 which was "Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on JPL web site, revealing...a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all".

In pragraph 12 it says that "What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms common around the American West". In paragraph 10 the text says that "Each pixel in the 2001 imange spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo".

When they first looked they saw a face, then the second time they looked closer it was just a regualar piece of landform. The person that wanted to publish it so that way everone can see it wanted it to be every where. Well it crtainly did go every where, a lt of people were talking about it and looking at the newspapers.

In the text it says that "The authors reasoned it would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars". In paragrap 7 it says that "Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on JPL web site, revealing...a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all".

In paragraph 7 it said this "When they flew over Cydonia for the first time, Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) team snapped a picture ten times sharper then the original Viking photo". Also the "Face on Mars" has since to become a pop icon.

Score: 3