Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I am against the development of the driverless cars. Studies have shown that the safest cars have alert drivers, also that driverless cars still need a driver, and the car could watch you as you watch the road.

These cars are not safe without humans driving. "In this way, the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and is a big concern." "This necessitates the car being ready to quickly get the driver's attention whenever a problem occurs." These cars are cannot do what we can do. Its not safe for you to not be driving and for the car to try to notify you if it needs help. A driverless car should not need help.

What is the point of driverless cars that cannot complete actions by themselves? "They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents." How can they be so called driverless, when they cannot complete basic actions by themselves?

Would you want someone watching you in your own car, shouldn't that be private? "Manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road. While the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver," this should not be necessary considering the car is considered driverless.

With all the evidence shown to you in the story you should know that driverless cars are unsafe without us, they cannot do basic driving actions without us and it watches us. I do not think that driverless cars should be developed and released to the public, I think humans have been doing a fine job driving themselves.

Score: 4