Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author supported his idea very well. He explained how

exploring Venus is going to be a challenge and why it is possible for it to happen.

The author said it is going to be a challenge because Venus atmosphere is dangerous. In paragraph 3 it say "Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere." It already sound challenging. Also the average temperture is over 800 degrees. That is inhabitable.

Those aren't the only problems. To go further than the tempertures, it also has erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes.

The author question us. In paragraph 4 he ask "If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?" He starts to explain how Venus was "the most Earth-like planet our solar system." Then he stated "what are the options for making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive?"

The author say NASA has "one particulary compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus." Have the scientists float above Venus. The author said "Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape." The author starts to explain the benefits of them doing that. Then he gave some problems it could have with doing that idea. He also explained how the technology from the 1940s can help with this project.

In conclusion, the author did a very good job with this article. He gave details and supporting details to help us understand the article.

Score: 3