Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
There are so many variations and models of cars in the world today. One very questioned type is the idea of a driverless car. There are some manufactures who have taken it upon themselves to try and make this car a reality. Driverless cars seem to be like pretty cool thing to have and show off, but they shouldn't be allowed.

These cars have a high expectation and a possibility of maybe changing the world. Driverless cars just aren't a human. A car should be fully controlled by a human being. They could help, but it involves too many risks rather than rewards. These cars can't react to every possible situation that presents itself. If a situation comes up and the car doesn't know what to do, how till the driver know. Will the car give the driver enough time? Another problem or delay is that there would have to be so many traffic laws changed or new ones and the same for laws after an accident occurs. There will be countless questions about what happens if the technology of the car fails or if someone gets injured. Who would be the blame for this? It is best for society to keep the cars the way they are now and have humans be the control.

Technology is well advanced in the world today. It is also what fuels the world every second of every day. The technology in a driverless car could depend on a life or injury. Why have a life depend on technology? Say no to driverless cars and be in control.

Score: 3