Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The face is just a natrual landform. In the article it says that NASA'S Viking 1spacecraft was just circleing around the planet, snapping photos of possible landing sites for its sister ship Viking 2, when it spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face. "A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see. The caption notedd a "huge rock formation... which resembles a human head...formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth." The aunthors reasoned it would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars.

The so called 'Face on Mars" has since become a pop icon. Some people think the face is bona fide evidence of life on Mars evidence that NASA would rather hide, say conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, defenders of the NASSA budget with there was an ancient civilization on Mars. Although few sientists believed the Face was an alien artifact, photographing Cydonia became a priority for NASA when Mars Global Surveyor arrived at the Red Plant in Sept. 1997, eighteen long years after the viking missions ended. And so on April 5, 1998, when Mars

Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time, Micheal Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing. . . a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all.

What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa landforms common around the American west. "It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Iidaho," says Garvin. "Thats a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same heeight as the Face on Mars." With this imformation you can include that the monument was just a landform, not anything mind blowing.

Score: 4