Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the article "Unmasking the Face on Mars" it says that it seems to be a face on mars,but there is not. The "face" that we see on is just a natural land form. We can tell that by many ways. Some ways are that in 2001 we see a picture of the so called "face of mars" closer and see it is not something created by aliens.

One way we know that the landform on mars is not made by aliens is that; scientist took a sharper photograph of the "face" in 2001. NASA states,"What the picture actually shows is the martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms common around the American West." The scientist prove that the "face" is just a landform.

Also the article tells us that hollywood makes up a lot of these things about there being aliens. In paragraph five it says,"The "Face on Mars" has since become a pop icon. It has starred in a hollywood film, appeared in books,magazines, and radio talk shows..." Hollywood makes up things like this to make us beleave in something just for them to make money.

Now on the other hand this could be true. Aliens could of put it there. The article even states,"Some people think the Face is

bona fide evidence of life on Mars-evidence that NASA would rather hide..." There is a chance however," Meanwhile, defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an achient civilization on Mars."

In the article it does state that there could be a "Face" on Mars made by aliens, but facts prove that the "Face" is just a natural landform. The picture took in 2001 proves alone that it is only a landform. So for now we know that Marvin the Martian isn't flying around building ancient civilizations.

Score: 3