Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author of "The Challenges of Exploring Venus" did not support this idea well. I know this because not only did they wait until the sixth paragraph to use the word challenges to replace the word risks, but they also waited until the very end of the article to explain their reasoning. Even when explain why they feel that exploring Venus is worth it the writing feels rushed. The article's overall tone just doesn't sit well. The message is supposed to be postitive, but the author spends so much time on how other people feel about exploring Venus and how other people fear the risks you start to agree with the oposition instead of the author.

This author did not support this idea well. and i know this because in the passage it states so many challenges but only a few soltions. For example, the author mentions "clouds of highly corrosive sulfirc acid in Venus's atmosphere", but we are given no solution to this proble to allow humans to explore the surface. this author also spells "liquify" as "liquefy" and I do not believe this is correct, and if this author cannot spell a simple word how can i trust their facts are true.

In conclusion this article feels rushed and too pessimistic. The author either did not put in much time to write this passage, or they just don't agree with what they are writing about, or perhaps they just did not care. No matter what the reason this article did NOT support the idea it was about well.

Score: 3