Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming," the author presents both positive and negative aspects for driveless cars. I am against the development of driveless cars because they can cause a debate when it comes to whos fault it is, it can also take away the fun of driving, they are also not very productive and can be really expensive. Just the idea of having driveless cars seem so futuristic and perhaps awesome but are thay really safe and actually productive? In the article, the author gave many negative aspects of driveless cars because they can always occur. In other words future cars are not as safe and possibly productive as they seem.

One of the big issues of driveless cars is who will be held responsible for the accidents that occur. The companies that produce the cars will probably not want to take responibility for the accident and what if the driver does not want to either? The author said,"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident". The company will lose millions of dollars and just because of one accident. In other senerios, if the driver is held responsible for the accident it would cost them lots of money as well. So who exactly would be held accountible for the accident if its a driverless car?

Another reason why I'm against the development of driveless cars is because they take away the fun in driving. Like the author said in paragraph eight," Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?". Staying inside a car is boring and its much more boring doing nothing at all. Would the driver lose interest and depend on the car to do everything when really the car also needs an actuall driver? This can cause safety issues. What if the driver does not notice the car is in need of assistance because they are on their phone or electronic device?

Driveless cars can also be really expesive and be less productive then the companies say they are. In the article it talks about how they combined many form of tectnology to finally get an almost finish product. It says in paragraph four," The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. The combination of all this input is necessary for the driveless car to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel". Could this mean that the car will be really expansive? Most forms of technology are really expensive and this driveless car will contain several pieces of technology just to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel. It also says that the car will only mimic a driver, but what will it do when it comes to very complex things such as accidents or taking a much more difficult route?

For these reason i am against the development of driverless cars.Driveless cars can cause debate, take the fun out ofdriving and finally they can be really expensive and not very productive.They will cause more problems then they solve and are really expensive. Although a driveless car sound really nice its too advanced for this time Era.

Score: 4