Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I'm against the idea of having driverless cars on the road. I dont like the idea of driverless cars because making them cost too much, they aren't completely driverless, they're illegal in most states and new laws would need to be made in

order to cover liability and it would be boring driving in a car that drives by itself.

A "driverless" car will need to have motion sensors all around the car to reduce the chance of accidents. If the car had motion sensors around it, we think it would know when to stop and when to go. But the cost of these things is outrageous. A radar cost 200 million dollars!

Another reason I disapprove of the "driverless" car is because the cars aren't completely driverless. Eventhough there are ways the car can announce when human services are needed, such as: vibrating seats, flashing lights, and just simply announcing when the human needs to take over, The human would still need to remain alert at all times because the smart cars aren't designed to know how to pull in and out of driveways, or navigate through work zones and around accidents. For these reasons human services are still needed.

The third reason why I think driverless cars would have a negative impact on

society is because we would need new laws for the cars liability and the cars are illegal in most states. What if there happened to be in accident because the person in the car wasn't paying attention, or maybe it was a manufacture malfunction. Who would be at fault? anyways, limited use of semi- autonomous cars is only legal in 3 states and the district of Columbia. so even though the thought of a car driving itself around sounds pretty cool, it would also be difficult to get it to be legal in all 50 states and international.

When you turn 16 one of the only things teenagers thinking about is their freedom and finally being on the road and able to drive. With driverless cars being brought up and manufactured, teenagers may not even get the chance to be on the road and drive for themselves. But even if someone is like 35 and has

already experienced driving by theirslef for the first time, wouldn't it still be boring? Just watching the road and not being able to do anything else because you have to stay alert at all times. Wouldn't it be kind of boring waitinf foryour turn to drive because the car that is supposed to be "driverless" doesn't know how to pull in and out of a driveway and it isnt designed to navigate through work zones and accidents?

In conclusion, I'm

against the thought of driverless cars because they're a watse of money, they're not completely driverless, they're illegal in most states and we would need more laws would need to be made in order of liability of the car, and it would be boring driving in a car that srives itself for you.

Score: 4