Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
What would you belive if you saw a face on a planet? Could it be and alien monument or a landform?That's what I'm here to do.Prove it's a natural landform. The face on Mars in a natural landform.

I believe it's a natural landform. The photos taken by the Viking 1 in 1976 and 1998 were taken by a much weaker camera. "...Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos." Technology has advanced majorly since the photos were taken.In 2001 a much sharper photo was taken revealing a natural landform.

It caught the intrest of many people.People wanted to know the truth so they waited for the newer picture to come out."Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing . . . a natural landform." The results were shocking to many but sadly you can't change the truth.

Many people argued that it appered to be a landform because of the weather Mars was having. I believe that it was a natural landform and they couldn't except the truth."The camera on board MGS had to peer through wispy clouds to see the Face. Perhaps, said skeptics, alien markings were hidden by haze." Even though the skeptics are in disbelief I know what I saw. I saw what looked like an uprise in the ground surrounded with a small mountain range.

I believe the face on Mars is a natural landform.Despite a lot of people thinking different I will have to agree with NASA this is a natural landform.It's an uprise in the ground with a small mountain range from my perspective.It's a natural landform.

Score: 3