Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In my opinion the author did support his idea.The author wrote about the challenge of exploring venous, In the essay he typed he covered some key points about how life is there and how he thinks that there might had been living things and oceans there before. He also talks about how NASA is working on other approaches to studying venous. In which he also says in the text that "travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts."

In paragraph three he talks about the atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets. It also says that the planets surface, the temperatures average over eight hundred degrees Fahrenheit which is most then its expected to be here in earth. It aslo talks about the atmospheric pressure being 90 times greater than what we experience in our planet. Which in this case he is trying to explain how the living conditions in venous are, which are " More extreme tha human encounter on earth." Basically the author covers the temperature and the state of living in venous, but he also talks about how NASA is working on other approaches to study venous..

The author wrote that " The National Aeronautics and Space administration" (NASA) are trying to send humans to study venous, and he continues talking about ways that NASA would allow scientists to float above the fray, which some people would believe that it's impossible. He gives examples of how jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude in order to fly over many storms and how they could manage a vehicle hovering over venous that could avoid the unfriendly ground coditions...etc

Not only did he talk about NASA'S plan but at the end of his argument he stated " Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors..." I agree with the author on this one because not only are humans interested in what could be there they're interested in what type of form life there is surviving in those types of weather and living conditions.

In conclusion in my opinion the author did support his idea. The author wrote about the challenge of exploring venous, in the essay/argument he typed he covered some key points about how life is there and how he thinks there might had been living things and oceans there before. He also talks about how NASA is working on other approaches to studying venous. In which he also says in the text that " Travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts."

Score: 4