Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
My position on driverless cars is to turn the cars into something different. In the text, it states that no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore. It, also states that Sergey Brin can imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because they don't need them anymore, because he envisions a future with a public transportation system where fleets or some type of driverless cars form a public-transport taxi system. I think that people should use their cars because a taxi is not always going to be availiable for them. So, they need to drive themselves places instead of having a taxi take them where they need to go.

Also, in this article it states that the cars Sergey Brin foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer way far more flexibility than a bus. It, also stated that he believes such cars would fundamentally change the world. I disagree with the taxi system because there won't always be a taxi availiable for you when you need to go places.

In my opinion, people should start driving themsleves to places they need to go instead of a taxi always having to go and always pick them up and take them where ever they need to go. I think it's a waste of gas for a taxi person always wasting there gas to go pick up people that have a car but don't want to drive it. I think taxi should only pick up people that don't have a car and take them places.

The text also states, that some companies are making computer drivern cars. In the late 1950's, General Motors created a concept car that could only run on a special track. It states, that the track was embedded with an electrical cable that sent radio signals to a receiver on the front of the car. Furthermore, it stated that engineers at Berkeley tried something very similar but they used magnets with alternating polarity than an electrical track.

Score: 2