Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Although there are advantages to having a smart car, the cars should no longer be developed. They should not be developed because the cars may assist but no car is completely driverless; The cars have several sensors but, still need full alertness of the driver just as a normal car would. The smart cars, by law, are not considered safe. In most states its illegal just to test smart cars.

Some may question wether the cars should be maufactured if they are not driverless. The smart cars require the driver to be fully alert so that they can take over in places where the car cannot drive it's self. Technology is something that help people do things more efficently, however, the smart car is not any more efficent than a regular car.

In most sates it is illegal just to test the cars, this is because the cars have not been proved reliably safe. If the cars are proved safe the law would then have to be changed to cover liability. In the case of an accident, who is at fult the car or the driver? This question could easily raise debate on wether the cars should be further developed because of the confusion and problems it could cause.

In some areas the cars can be tested. There have been no crashes in all of the testing but does this make up for all of the faults of the cars? Some may argue that the cars are benificial. If this is the case, how benifical are they? The fact that the cars are not consdidered "safe", that the cars are not driverless and that they are illegal all outweigh the potenital of the smart cars.

The cars should no longer be developed. The cars are not safe. Since they require as much attention as a regular car, they are not an enhancement to the tecchnology we already have. The idea of a smart car seems benificial however, this perfect car cannot be achived in reality.

Score: 4