Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author did not make enough claims to support his idea on why it's a good idea to even go to Venus. In the passage on paragraph 3, the author states that there is a thick atmosphere that is almost 97 percent carbon dioxide that covers up venus. Even worse, the clouds are highly corrosive sulfuric acid. The atmosphere pressure on venus is 90 times more powerful than what we experience here on earth so why should we still go? In the text on paragraph 5 it talks about how there will be a vehicle that will hover over venus so it doesn't get affected by any of venuses harmful atmosphere. There will be a vehicle that will hover over venus, but the temperatures will still be the same which will harm the vehicle, and the pressure would be that of sea level, though the sea level is indurable for humans. That isn't much of a problem, the problem is that the vehicle will be hovering venus from 30 miles above, so what they will see on venus is very limited and light cannot peirce through the dense atmosphere. In order to really get up close to venus and study it, lives have to get risked. In the text it says that NASA is working on ways to make it to venus and stay on it by making some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide and they lasted about 3 weeks on a simulation of venuses conditions. They are also working on another project with old technology called mechanical computers. What is special about those technology is that they are runned by gears and levers but do not require electronics at all. All of these inventions are great but they are stil very delicate when it comes to extreme physical conditions. In conclusion the author did not make enough claims to support his idea on why we should go because of venus's atmosphere, the density of it, the lack of visibility of it, the temperature, and mordern technology isn't enough to withstand the conditions of venus.

Score: 3