Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the future, driveless cars can become something big that can benefit or cause problems. Cars in my opinion should be driven by people and not driven by a car. It would be better because people wouldn't have to be depending on the car. Plus, everyone takes a drivers test before getting a official license. Would people still need one to drive a car that already drives itself?

Cars either way have to be driven. "They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills." This quote in the draft explains well on how a car still can't compete with actual human help to drive. It can also tell how driving a car still requires someone. Especially when they go through construction work or other accidents on the road.

The safety is also important. "Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers." This is an example of how people need alert drivers and not some random car driving itself. They need someone to be in control of a car and watching the road.

It will cause many problems. "If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault—the driver or the manufacturer?" This statement is true. Who will be responsible? It would probably be the drivers and the cars fault, but would someone actually be blamed if the car was driving? They would have to think of laws that would have to protect the people in the accident and who aren't.

All of this with the car that drives itself is just to much for people. People can't be depending on technology even more, but in their skills. They need to know that they can drive and prevent things from happening and not having to depend on a car to do the work for them. Where will they be in the future, if people do sale these cars and put them in the streets?

Score: 4