Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I would be against the development of theses cars, just for the fact if you have no control over ther car the car could crash more likely than a car a person is controlling, because what happens if a car is about to have a car accident and you have no controll to turn the car so it won't crash as well. I feel it would be better if we people took controll of driving and not some system put in the vehicle that controls it. We may have had google cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009, where cars can drive more than a half a million miles without crashing, but at the same time the google car is truly driverless because the car will still have to alert the driver to take over if something goes wrong.

In 2013, BMW announced the development of "Traffic Jam Assistant", cars can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure drivers keep hold of the wheel in case something goes wrong. None of the cars we drive today are completely driverless, we still have to keep control of the wheel, how fast we go, and sometimes when we stop. Some of the cars can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills.

I feel we should just have control on the car for most of the part, just in case something does go wrong because if the car takes over who knows if something will go wrong because what happens if your car can't warn you if something is going wrong. You wont know til something does go wrong, that just isn't safe to me i am completely against the development of theses cars.

Score: 3