Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
While

writing the "Challenge of Exploring Venus", the author knew almost everything he or she needed to know. The auhtor knew the risk and danagers, the benifits, and even the history. With the author knowing the facts I think he or she didn't do a good job of realy supporting his idea, that exploring venus is valuable due to the fact that, he has more negatives than positives that cancle out the beinfits of the exploration.

"Researchers cannot take samples of rock,gas, or anything else." If researchers can't take back sample or any physical testing iteams from Venus, It'd be a huge waist of time. Not only a waist of time but also more importantly money. That's important because if you can see the planet that should be just enough, instead of spending millions of dollars on a dangerous space mission for you not to be able to take test samples and to risk lives flying astronounts through a "highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere."

Not only does Venus have a high acidic atomsphere but it also has a really high level of pressure that

would "crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans." This statement alone completely debonk's the authors entire idea that exploring Venus is a great idea. The idea of exploring Venus after reading that argument shouldn't even be close to being considered due to the fact that we wouldn't be able to get a ship in the air space of Venus. But if we were to even get a space craft

pass Venus's highly acidic atmosphere without melting, then the spacecraft would more then likely slowly be crushed.

Last but not least, actually landing a space craft of any sort, with it lasting for a long enough time is virtually impossible. Due to Venus's "surface tempurature average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit," It'd liquify many many melts. Not only is the ground tempurature scortching hot but Venus is full of "erupting valcanos,powerful earthquakes and frequent lighting strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface."

In conclusion, that author did not do a very good job at supporting their idea. The main reason the author failed to do a good job is because he or she had more facs to go against their argument, and aso their arguement was almost just an imagination of a way to explore venus by hoveirng 20 to 30 miles off the surface.

Score: 3