Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Theres multiple things with the diverless car i agree with and things i disagree with. I think that developing the "Traffic Jam Assist" is a great and important idea. I agree That the cars can steer, accelrate, and break them selfs, but all are desighned to notify the driver when the road ahed requires human stills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. Because perhaps the smart car isnt as smart as it thinks it is, the car ahead of you collides with the on coming tafic on a green light when your smart car is going the speed limit. The car couldnt see what was happing infront of you but you can conrtol the breaks and call 911 to report it. If your smart car would have had all control it would of smashed through the other cars like a bullet, Causing you to be ingerd also. I also strongly agree with the driverless car because drivers tend to get tierd/bored of not driveing for a long period of time because, most people do get bored easy and not driveing can cause alot of bordom on a long road. It could cause the driver to fall asleep and not notice the danger infront of their faces. The text states " Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?" "The psychological aspects of automan are really a challenge," admits Dr Werner Huber.

I do infact disagree with the thought of manufactuers considering to use cameras to watch that divers are remaining focused on the road. While the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver. I beleive that drivers desirve their privacy. Even if they are supposed to be driveing their not going to want someone/ something watching them the whole time. They could have really bad anxiety with they know that theres a camera on them the whole time and it could destract the driver.

Score: 2