Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the exepet to support his clam the author explains all the problems and things wrong with exploring Venus then goes into explaning ways that'll help fix those problembs. But his plain back fired because it just doesn't at all seem like it'll ever happen any time soon.

In paragragh three it is explaining why it's so dangeros to go. it is 97% CO2 in the air, the tempertatur is over 800 degres Fahrenheit, the air has asid in it, and the presher would crush a sumberen which is made for high persesher. All of paragragh three just doesn' help his case at all.

In paraghrah four the author then goes intpo how its better to move ingto Venus rather then to mars bc of time it takes to get to mars. Well if Venus is so dangarus then why even think about ging there. Nasa already has been on Mars abd its the safest to go on. The author should have explainded more reasons as to why its better to go to Venus then mars.

However the author did explain ways as to deal with those problems that Venus prsents to us. on of whitch is how if the drones fly higher then the presher is lower as well as the temp. Buthe then goes into how the drown still can't take video or pictures of the planit becouse the desity of the ari is so bad below its unfotoghraghiball. which defets the point of adding that in if its usles. its just nonsene thats not needed to help his claim.

Thought that part was unneeded in paraghragh seven it talks about an idea of a new drown that'll be able to stand three weeks on the grown on Venus. That there is good evidenst to support his claim.

To conclud the author may have given all the eviens he could but most of it was not good evidents to support his claim of going to Venus even thought the dangarus.

Score: 3