Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars would be an outstanding invention and even though we have some cars that can speed up, brake and steer on their own, thier not "driverless". There are many things wrong with the whole driverless car idea. Most of the cars already developed with high tech features concluding that the car is somewhat driverless all have to have the human holding the wheel. Wrecklessness is also a big concern. If something happened with the car would it be the owners fault or the manufacturers. If driverless cars made it to the world then all car laws would have to be changed. The question is, would we be willing to change our nation as we know just to be toted around?

The problem with the driverless car idea is that humans will have to be alert, no matter how high tech the car is. In the passage it mentioned only few car companies that developed a somewhat autopilot car, but the driver still has to be alert and have his or her hands on the wheel to sense that someone is in the car. Throughout the years colleges and other people have tried to make this fantasy of driving cars come true. For example, in 1950 General Motors found a way for cars to drive themselves by putting them on a track and having an electrical cable send radio signals to the car. But the project was simply too expensive.

Safety would be a concern to many people. Would people be comfortable being driven around without the control to stop anything if something were to arise? Yes, there would most likely be a decrease in traffic and accidents. But, who says nothing can happen. What if someone got injured somehow, would the blame be on the owner or the manufacturer?

Driveless cars are completly different than manual driven cars. That means the laws would be completely different. The reason we have laws for manual cars is so that nothing wreckless happens. Of course problems do occur but thats because we're human and we aren't perfect. But, what would the laws be for driveless cars? For example, speeding laws wouldn't need to be in place. Since the driveless car is self-driving then it would be able to sense what the speed should be. Whether its in the cables controlling the cars or a satellite in space. Road rules would be replaced because we would have to completely change the roads so that the driveless cars can be controlled. We would be changing our entire nations.

Next time someone asks about driveless cars stop and think for awhile. Do you really want to change the nation so that you don't have to drive? Of course people would, but you have to think about all the cons of it. Do you really want to risk the safety of others or changing the laws you've been accustomed to for so many years? Do people really want the goverment to put all this money into this idea just so they can say its not completely driveless? After all, thats what everyone wants, a driveless car.

Score: 4