Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I think the face on mars is just a face of landform because, how would aliens make a face on a planet? A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see, then NASA captioned it "huge rock formation" they didn't say nothing about aliens and probably didn't even think about aliens. After 18 years they finally stopped researching about the face on mars. I think that is was just there as a land formation because, I don't think any person or alien could make a face on a planet. After the years went on you could see the face even more, but the only reason why NASA couldn't see it clear is because in 1976 the aliens markings were hidden by haze, which says exactly in the text, "Perhaps, said skeptics, alien markings were hidden by haze." NASA says "We just don't pass over the Face very often."

A lot of the scientists think that it's a alien artifact, which then later on, the scientists figure it was just another Martian mesa. But this face was a little different then the other ones by, unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh. In the text it says, "which resembles a human head... formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth." If NASA says the Face On Mars was really big, then how many years do you think it took to make the face if it was a alien artifact? But then again it says in the text "There was no alien after all." This discovery took NASA 25 years to figure what it really was, and everybody has been talking about it for 25 years, because, this is like a one time thing, you would never see a face on a planet!!

There's been to much information that it wasn't aliens, and it says in the text that "Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing... a natural landform." So again there clearifying and making sure that everyone don't freak out and just make sure it's a natural landform.

Score: 3