Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars have both their prositives and negatives. The idea that cars will be use half of the fuel today is good thing for air pollution and that they will offer more flexibility than a bus is also. Some negatives would include that they will invade your privacy and that traffic laws might not advance as the car industry does.

Cars will use "half the fuel of today's taxis". This would be a positive because then there will be less air pollution. A person that is part of the fuel industry might bring up the fact that with that the fuel economy will start to decrease. There will not be much profit and that will not be good for them. Driverless cars will "offer more flexibility than a bus". This would be good for people that need to get to work fastser or get somewhere else faster. Buses have to make stops as they go whereas this car would not. Sergey Brin "beleives such cars would fundamentally change the world.

These driverless cars could potentially use "cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road. While the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver." This idea would leave drivers with very less privacy in these cars. You will not know when you are being watched. One other big negative part of driverless cars is that they traffic laws might not advance along with the cars. In order for all of this to work out you would need for everyone to work along.

Driverless cars may be the future that people will have to adapt to. Many people play a vital role in this because many things will have to change. I think that they should not be the future because I do not like the idea that they will invade privacy. You will not know who is watching you at any given time. You will not know if you are even being watched. This can make drivers feel as if they are not being trusted. Some people may disagree with that because after all it does have many postive aspects.

Score: 3