Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Who says that driverless cars will make our future better? The ones who want to destroy it. I am against driverless cars for three reasons,

it could result to global warming,it will cost alot of money, and could be hazardous to the safety of all organisms. This is my belief because I feel that these cars will make the world fall apart even faster.

First, driverless cars can result to global warming. To be able to build these cars, the humans will build multiple factories to make the parts. They will release new unknown toxins into the air, that can possibly be untreatable. Also, they will take up alot of new land, and destroy forests, and our oxygen supply.

Second, it will cost alot of money. Money is crucial in this world. It would cost millions, close to billions, to try to find parts that would be needed to construct the vehicles.Then to go out and try to hire people to make these cars. Also, if these vehicles are actually made, it will cost all of the people who would die to have these cars, pay thousands.

Finally, the safety of all organisms. Who's to say that these vehicles wont malfunction? It is already forbidden in Calinfornia, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia, to test drive these cars due to the fact that, it is unknown whether it is safe or not. If someone gets into a wreck in this supposedly safe vehicle, which will be the one to blame? The manufacturer, or the driver? If this backfires, there will be lawsuits, fighting, and violence.

In conclusion, all signs really do point to the opinion that the driverless car is a bad idea. It's believed to make our even more dark and dangerous then it could possibly be. Driverless cars could be our worlds undoing. It could cause global warming and flood our earth. It could cost a lot of money making millions of people go bankrupt, and lastly it could be deadly to all life on the planet.

Score: 4