Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Using this technology to reads students expressions in the classroom is not valuable. I don't thinks its valuable becuase a student could be feeling mad or sad and by the teacher knowing that could ask the student what is wrong. Although there is nothing wrong with asking that the student themselves may want to be left alone. It also a I feel like violates a sense of privacy. I don't think students will want a camera staring at them in the classroom. It seems like the technology uses cameras and that makes some parents uncomfortable with the idea of it. The technology seems to be a thing used for scientific purposes not classroom usage for teachers. The article say the software could detect when a student is bored. Teachers could avoid this by trying to keep the lesson exciting and interesting. A teacher should be able to read a students facial expressions without the help of a computer program. Although yes it could help a teacher more it seems a lot less practical. I say this because the teacher could need to open up a computer or something along those lines. Upon opening up the program the teacher would have to check each and every students emotions based upon their facial expressions. Another thing wrong I see wrong with this is, what if a student does not really feel down or mad and the software miscalculates it. Some people have a resting that just looks mad. They may not be mad but they seem like they are. In conclusion I do not think this software will be usable in classroom setting for my points listed above. The idea of it sounds good but the excution is not the best.

Score: 2