Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The devlopment of driverless cars should not be continued due to, conflicts with traffic laws, the failure and price of the technology required and the ambiguoity of who is at fault in times of accidents.

Traffic laws are designed to secure the safety of all drivers on the rode, but said laws can become irrelevant if the driver does not have complete control of his or her vehicle. The text states, "Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers." This piece of text evidence exemplifies how lawmakers pass driving laws with the mindset the driver is alert while on the road; however driverless cars do not require the driver to be alert, which could result in accidents in the future. The text also states, "...traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result in most states it is illegal to even test computer driven cars." From this example we have insight on how lawmakers make laws: with the assumption that all cars have a human driver. If the human driver is taken out of the equation, then the safety of others on the road simply cannot be guaranteed with a car operating on its own.

Technology works to our benefit at times, but it is not flawless. The text Sebastian Thrun says, "...Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars. It wasn't something you could bay at Radio Shack." In other words Trun is telling about the price of such techonology and it was not an item average people could just buy. The text also states, "...uses position estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor.... LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form constantly updatint 3-D model of the car's surroundings." From this example we receive insight on the intricate technology involved in making a such a car run. Most people would argue that the technology is tested and proven safe; however, the fact lingers that technology can fail at unpredictable times. The price of the technology required to run the driverless car, as well as the possible failure in technology will remain an obstacle.

When accidents happen, in most cases the driver at fault can be determined; this becomes ambigious with driverless cars. The text states, "[With driverless cars] new laws will be needed to cover liability in the case of an accident." This example shows how new laws would need to be passed to determine who is held accountable at times of accidents. The text also states, "If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?" This example shows how it can be unclear in times of accidents if who is to blame for accidents, and in extreme cases even the manufacturers could even be blamed. Drvierless cars would raise a new issue of requiring new traffic laws and the ambigiouity of who is responsible when accidents occur.

The development of driverless cars should not be continued due to, conflicts with current traffic laws, the failure and sheer price of the technology required to run the vehhicle, and the ambigiouity of who is liable at times of accidents.

Score: 4