Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Our, planet Earth has created landforms in weird shapes and sizes. Could Mars have been capable to sculpture the "Face on Mars?" I definitley think so. The "Face on Mars," was not created by aliens. Here are my reasons why.

My first reason is that the face might just be an illusion. According to the article, the "Face on Mars," is located at 41 degrees north martian latitude where it was winter. This is a cloudy time of year. The sun could be making the unusual shadows giving you the illusion. Also the height of the so called "nose," could be making shadows that form the "eyes," tricking theorist, thinking it looks like a face.

My second reason is that there was no form of life seen near this landform. Building the Face could have taken years and years. NASA would probably have witnessed an alien or aliens during the process of construction. No tools or artifacts were left behind. As said in the passage, " No alien monument at all."

My last and final reason is that the Face is just another martian equivalent of a bette or mesa. They are very common around the America West. This could have been the case for Mars.

Jim Garvin from the passage says that the Face reminds him of Middle Butte that is the same height as the face.

You might think there is no way Mars could have created the face so percise and accurately. Its is possible that a meterorite could have hit Mar's surface and coincidentally made it look like a face. Earth does have landforms that are odd as well which can go the same for Mars.

Those were my reaons why the Face is just another natural landform. As you can see that "Face on Mars,"

was not built by aliens. Conspiracy theorist are in a misunderstanding. Aliens may not have been capable to create a human face. Just rethink all the real life facts and dont jump to any conclusions.

Score: 3