Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the article "Driveless Cars Are Coming" two sides of whether there should or should not be driveless cars are given.

Through out the article both sides use experts from car companies and scientists to give their side, or opinion, of this argument.

Reasons such as drivless cars aren't completely driveless and still need the driver's attention are given which gives the reader a standpoint against this argument.

Driveless cars are expensive and dangerous.

In paragraph 6 of this article, it states that the make-up of a driveless car consists of sensors and other parts of the car add up to two hundred million dollars to manufacture.

Another fact given in paragraph 7 states that "The car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel."

The quote just given shows how driveless cars aren't truly driveless and by using this point to back up the claim this kind of car would be a big waste of money because it doesn't fully serve it's purpose.

Last, but not least, if an accident were to happen would the blame go upon the manufacturer or the driver who was supposed to be assisting the wheel.

Although this idea of a driveless car is a good one and shoots for the sky, there is no way it could work out at the end of the day.

Too many points go into why driveless cars would not work rather than how they do.

Driveless cars are too expensive and dangerous to have exist, and people shouldn't rely on this kind of car because technology errors happen all the time while humans have the advantage of reaction time and common sense.

In conclusion, our roads would be safer if we kept human controlled cars.

Score: 3