Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
If I was debating this topic, I would use facts to back my answer up. I believe that you should put facts before belief in this scenario, because you can't wish things into existance. I would use many facts from the text. I don't believe that it could have been made by aliens if the same type of thing exists in Western America. It would be impossible to prove me wrong, because the only things that I'd say are facts.

I have all the evidence that I need in this text. In paragraph 12 it says "What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms common around the American West." Even NASA said that it wasn't an alien made monument, NASA also said that it would be great for them if they were able to find solid evidence that aliens were real. Meaning that, if this was made by aliens they wouldn't keep it from the public.

I don't think that NASA would keep it a secret if they found proof of aliens. They would tell the public so that they could get the attention and funding from the public so that they could do more research. I believe that the abscence of evidence is not the evidence of abscence, but I also believe that if they had evidence they wouldn't keep it hidden, so I'm not saying that they won't find evidence, I'm just saying that if they did have evidence they wouldn't keep it a secret. That's why I have to disagree for now, and I won't agree until I have a solid reason to.

Score: 3