Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
My postion is agaist Driverless cars. From the article they are reliable. The saftey sensors could not function properly due to all the movement on the wrong also with the changes of directions. A GPS may be capiable of this but the GPS is not also controling the car. A GPS is basicailly the same thing as a sensor they work very much the same. The name doesnt even soud safe "A driverless car" it soiunds like an idea without very much put thought into it. Only

three states dont make to it illegal just to test the Driverless Car. That tells us that they are dangerious from all of the possible outcomes.

The biggest reason to be agaist this product called "The Driveless Car"

is because the human is not in control of the vehical at all times. Yes the car has motion seniors b ut there is a lot of activies and movement on the road. On e crash from another vehical and motion seniors can be unsure what to do and where to go. For example what will the motion senior do at a 4 way road. there are too many risks and danerious possiblities.

Other big factors that could effect the technology is weather, water, wifi, the brakes could be second too late before hitting an object. One the first Driveless Cars model is a BMW that can reach up to 25 Mph. Now a car going 10 mph can put someone in the hopstial. A BMW not totally controled by a human at 25 mph can seriously hurt someone. those add to the big number of dangerious possiblities.

Overall just testing this car is dangerious. We can only trust our phones to get the job done only 75% of the time. It would not be wise or "Smart" to trust some technoigly that is in the same boat to drive us around at 25 mph speeds.

Score: 3