Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars may seem like the best thing to ever happen in the world, but they are probably not the best choice for everyone to make. Conflicts arise such new laws having to be created for who would be liable if there was ever an accident to happen, you would still have to drive at some point, and some of the funding may be too expensive.

Laws are things that can protect us, but what would happen if we were involved with a accident while in a driverless car? "New laws would be needed in order to cover liability" if there was ever an accident to happen with a driverless car. But the problem with that is that no one would know who was at fault, the driver or the car.

Whenever you hear the word "driverless car" you probably think of not having to driver and put your foot on the gas. Just because you think that a driverless car willl totally set you free from driving, it actually will not. "... the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires". Driverless does not mean you are set free.

Although, there were tests to practice these cars with there would be some "..required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply expensive". If the car companys and sponsors could not raise enough money for all the upgrades to existing roads that woud be required if driverless cars were the next "big" thing, how could we even drive the driverless car?

In conclusion, driverless cars are not a good thing because new laws would have to be created to cover liability if there was ever an accident with the driverless car, you will still have to drive the car at some point, and they would require expensive funding for upgrades to make things suitable for the driverless car.

Score: 3