Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Hello, my name is Capri. I will be arguing against the use of Driverless cars. In the passage it talks alot about how the new smart cars/ driverless cars have been here since 2009. I think that it is a smart and useful invention. But I really dont think we are quite ready for it right now, especially since it comes with a few flaws. Our normal cars are even getting call backs so

imagine what what would happen if you weren't fully in control of our vehicles. It says in the passage that it isnt fully driverless which to me signifies that we shouldnt be using something that isnt living up to the invention purpose.

Its going to be electrical so what if there is a bug or virus in the system that cant handle driving or wont let us drive at all. This could result in

serious accident or injury. Yes I think that this is a brilliant invention I just think that it shouldnt be displayed or used until we are 110% that is comepletely safe and ready to be driven.

For example what if I, Capri, was married to John and we had a son. we could be driving in a driverless car and it could flash for one of us to take over and steer, but the vehicle is malfunctioning and not letting us drive. We crash, have to pay fees, insurance ect... What if they saw us as we were the cause of the accident but it all was because of a faulty system that wasnt ready to be used.

So i say no we should not use driverless cars, it is hazardous, just like a regular car. We should be inventing something that is safer than a car not equal or less safe.

Score: 2