Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars sound like a splendid idea to the people, but the person who is making them is only getting more money. People will lose their money due to driverless cars. If a driverless car were to break down what would the person do? I am against driverless cars because people do not need to dependable on technology, the car crash rates will increase, and the tradition of driving independent will be lost.

Driverless cars are useless because people do not need to be dependable on technology. Technology is never 100% efficent. Cars do not need to be all technology where the driver just sits and lets a car drive for itself. Being dependable on a technology car is pointless and can easily have a lot of negative outcomes to having one. Driverless cars cannot be trusted. Trusting a driverless car to take another human being to a destination is dangerous and sketchy. A car should be driven by a human not technology.

Driverless cars are useless because the car crash rates will increase. In the article, it says "Further improvements in sensors and computer hardware and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more driving tasks on their own." Sensors cannot protect weather situations from cars. Hydroplaning and sliding on ice can be a big factor for increase of car crash rates. In the article, it states that there are sensors that are alarmed to the human driver to take over the wheel. The driver could not hear the sensor or beep and easily get in a car crash. The driver can also fall asleep at the wheel when driving for a great distance considering the driver doesnt have to do anything. Car crashes will increase when driverless cars are brought out to the whole country.

Driverless cars are useless because the tradition of driving independant will be lost. Driver's are astounded when they first get to be independent with their license. Technology will ruin a tradition where a human trusts him or herself to get to a destination safely. Humans need to still experience driving on their own because if not they will never be independent. Humans will be more dependable on technology than their own selves. Being independent is a step into life everyone has to take. Driving independent means people can depend on themselves instead of others.

Driverless cars are an excuse for more money for manufacturers and a lesson in nurturing people more to be non-independent. People need to be independent so they can make it in the real world, if not then they will go through a ton of pain and suffering. To depend on something is like being fed a baby bottle when people are in their twenties. It's not right and not acceptable to any generation of that kind. Humans driving their own car, with their two eyes hands and feet will get the job done. Technology doesn't need more accidents of injuring people just because there was a malfuntion. Is our generation really going to depend on technology rather than themselves?

Score: 4