Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I personally am agianst driverless cars.

They seem too rekless, like it says in the artical, so far no noe has made a fully driverless car and the driver still has to be aleart to take over at any given momnet. What would happen the the driver got tired and ignored that 'rule' and took a nap? More the likely they, along with others, would end up in a crash.

If that situation did happen, couldn't they try and sue the company who made the car because they claimed it was 'driverless' or that "the car did not warn me well enough". What if the car malfunctioned while switching over to a human driver and the people on the smart car or other cars got seriosualy injured or even killed. Would it be the drivers fault for not being prepared for such an event or would it be the people who designed and made the cars fault? Through out the ages when it comes to techonolgy there are too many ways to count of things going wrong or malufunctiong.

All in all it just seems dangerous and risky. The bigest risk is if the techonolgy fails and someone gets hurt or looses their life because of "techional diffuclities". Sure, having driverless cars could mean you 'the driver' could do things while at the wheel. Though think, if somehthing bad were to happen to you, a friend a family member or just someone you cared for, would you wish you were in control so you might have been able to change the out come?

If the

situation got bad or even change to a life or death situation. If someone who was smart enough to find out where the cars 'smarts' are (the place where it is driverless) and brakes it what would or could happen to you or anyone you let drive it? Being in control of something as dangerous yet fun like driving is better then being "hands free" and not in control of situations that could occur.

Score: 3