Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driveless cars are cool and very furtristic, mainly appleaing to a handful of people. Driveless cars don't use much gas or any at all, there for helping the enviroment. They have to run on something though, and that is battiers or rail ways. Many people are blinded by the fact that they are driveless cars. They don't see what is really happening with the cars,

My statement is that I don't think they should be making driveless cars. There are so many things people haven't consiterd. For example Google hasn't mastered the driveless car yet, it could take them years or even centiures. When they do "master" it they'll have to make more and more cars. If they mess up on one little thing the car wont be able to go or get into an accident.

The cars don't run on gas, which is good for the enviroment but then how would we get around? Google would have to rebuild all the roads, which will cost thousands maybe even millions. They would probably go to the big cites first and then forget about small towns, leaving them with regular cars.

The sensors are probably very fragile, not to mention the most important thing for the car. What would happen if one of your sensors broke? You couldn't just run to the auto store and ask them to fix it, they wouldn't know how or even have the part. There you would be missing important things.

They're so many things that could go wrong with with these cars, but that's also true with regular cars, Since regular cars have been around though we know what to do when our car breaks down. We also have built all the roads so we wouldn't be spending trillions of dallors on that, Plus with these new cars we would lose jobs and millions of people wouldn't be able to go back to college to learn about these new cars. There for I don't think we should get driveless cars.

Score: 3