Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The article about driverless cars makes cars without drivers seem great the only part they did not mention is. What happens if the car bugs out completly and explodes with the driver inside. Since we don't know how much technology will be in them there is no way of knowing if something like this would happen. Other things that seem to good to be true is uses less fuel the car would need to be arrow dinamic and lighter for this.

I think that a driverless car would be good for long trips for incase you fall asleep it will wake you up but also keep the car steady and reduce the risk of a person dieing from falling asleep at the wheel. It would be bad because if the technology needed you to look forward the whole time your driving then it would be a boring trip.

Then there is the problem of whose fault is it if a crash happens a near impossible thing to figure out. The person at the wheel could have taken control and then crashed or the technology could have bugged out and both parties could it was the other's fault. It would be an endless cycle of arguing back and forth.

Inconclusion the driverless cars could be good if they were able to be in control the whole time even if there was anything out of the ordinary. The whole debate about a crash and who's to blame would be constant and niether party would be happy. Just think if you won and the person fixing your car holds a grudge they could mess with your car to get back at you.

Another problem is if they have a recall and those are the only cars out. Then if everyone of them are on the recall list then people would be layed off for messing up so bad. Some people would have to run all the way across town to there job and many other problems would occur.

Score: 3