Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The computer software which has been invented is to test the emotion of people. But it is not really a good way to test people like that. If you want to understand the people's thinking when they have a emotion, why don't you learn ecycology?

The program tested Mona Lisa's smile and the result said "83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted..." If I'm an artist, I painted a character which is really beautiful, but I just make that character's emotion really happy, and wants to shows the audience it's a beautiful girls with a joyful face. When the computer software test the emotions of my character and shows these results, I will be really disappointed at these results --- It's way more too acurately! It can ruined one artist or someone else's life.

The computer learned things way more faster than us, "all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles" From FACS, the program will detected the six basic motions: happiness, suprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness. Well, that's not going to be accurate, from the example, "your frontalis pars lateralis muscle (above your eyes) raises your eyebrows when you're surprised", this surprise emotion is just an opinion of the creator Dr. Paul Eckman. I can be tired and showing that emotion too. When the computer is testing the students in the class, there are so many emotions in the class, but even they express their emotion, it's still not fair enough to prove what thoughts do they have. "A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored", at this point, the computer is testing everyone's emotion. But remember, study is not fun, normally that you will get bored. If someone have a happy face in the classroom, that means he is "crazy" or distracted by other stuff. So it's useless to testing the student's emotions in the class.

Indeed, the ecycology is better than the program. We can looks through other peoples emotion by our eyes and communicate with them, you will still understand their emotion, because we have our brain to calculate. The article "Making Mona Lisa Smile" mentioned "we humans perform ths same impressive 'calculation' everyday", and than give an example to inform the human calculation more precisly. Even though it's a concession, it still shows it's not necessary to use this kind of tecnology to predict people's emotions.

In addtion, the computer which created by man is still from the human knowledgement, or human "data base", which is brain. But it can be limited the testing area, like the emotion that predict wrong. Altough it can test through the muscle changing, It still cannot prove the true feeling of the human. The reason why we have ecycology this courses because people's brain is way more better than the computer. Computer is fast, but it based on human knowledge, also use there is no way to creat a perfect program --- everyone has different opinion to the creator of the program. So it's not really valuable to use this kind of tecnology to read student's emotional expressions.

Score: 3