Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The face on mars is most known as a alien creation , however people don't know if its a natural landform or a alien creation. People who would actually try to look in to it to find facts if its a alien creation or a natural landform.

People don't always think that creations like that can be made by a natural landform. If you see in the article "Unmasking the Face on Mars" they give ecidence showing that the face on mars was actually a natural landform. It states " A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see . The caption noted a "huge rock formation ... which resembles a human head," The qoute is saying that when they out the image closer it looks like a human head made by rocks "

"The image first appeared on a JPL website, reavealing ... a natural landform , there was no alien monment after all." According to the article "Unmasking the Face on Mars". This qoute is saying real evidence that there was no alien monument the face on mars was a natural landform.

Although few scientists believe the face was an alien artifact, a scientist named Jim Garvin proved them wrong by saying "What the picture is actually showing is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms comman around the Amercian West." Scientists Garvin is proving that the face was a nautral landform.

Score: 2