Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
the advantages of limiting car usage is a good thing. cuts down on greenhouse gasses. but dont worry the rate that people are getting there licences is going down. i think that fines are a good way to cut down on golable emitions.

if we do what they did in vauban in the united states we could cut down on the greenhouse gasses and make citys more breathable. make them it better for people to get around and use less space for highways and malls. or we can fine people when they use cars and that would really cut down on the gas.

less and less people are not getting there licences because the have no reason to when thay can just car pool and the evolution of shared van services for getting to work. the rates of car ownership per household and per person started to come down 2 or 3 befor the down turn. if it persists many sociologists believe it will have benefical implications for carbon emissions and the environment. there are shifts in the driving population that have droped suggest that the trend may accelerate.

like in paris that fined people $31 for driving. and exceptions were made for plug-in cars, hybrids, and cars carring 3 or more people. but public transport was free. in the city diesel fuel was blamed, it makes up 67% of vehicles in france. compaired to a 53.3% average for the rest of western europe. paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter compared with 114 in brussels and 79.7 in london in conclusion the advantages of limitating car usage is a good thing.1 it cuts down on greenhouse gasses. 2 fines help over all. and 3 licence rate is droping.

Score: 3