Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I claim that the author does support theides of studying very well becausethe travels on earth should not be limited because it may be very dangerous .

The evidence or explanation that supports my claim is that it says so many thing that are drangeous like "Not a single spaceship has touched down on venus in more than tree decades.Numerous factors contribute to venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximityto us. And it also says "A thick atmosphereofalmost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. Even more challrnging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmosphere. The sufaces temperatures average is over 800 and its pressure is 90 times bigger that what it was. This is some information of my evidence that the author supports his ides that studying venus is a worthypursuit despite the dangers.

Venus can provide only limited insighton ground conditions because most forms of light cannotpenertrate the dense atmosphere.The most important thing is that researchers cannot take saples of rocks,gas, or anything in venus.Therefore scientists want to do a mission going to understand venus .Researchers are working on innovations so the machines can last more time to knowledge.There making electronics made of silicon carbide,and they have been tested.

This is why i claim that the author supports the idea of studyng venus.I think its dangerous.And scientest orany researcher shouldnt go for its safty.In conclusion Thats my claim for the authors support.

Score: 2