Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I believe that this is just a landform. The "face" on mars is cleary just a landform. There is no proof aliens are even real. I will be explaining why I think it's the cameras fault, it's just a landform, or shadows were to blame.

If you look at the first photo it does kinda look like a face, but as the years go by there are better cameras and the "face" don't really seem like a face any more. In the worse case, this could just be the scariest landform ever. In paragraph 10 it explains "each pixel in the 2001 image spans a.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo," this would mena that the camera used in 2001 was better than the one used in 1976. The photo in the 2001 photo looks like a lump in the ground.

In paragraph 12 Garvin states "It reminds me most of Middle Buttle in the Snake River of Idaho," this wouldmake sense because it would be a landform. It might just be a little likely for it to look like a face. In paragraph 7 is clearly states "there was no alien monument after all."Landforms are just sometimes diferent and this is one of them.

Maybe shadows are just to blame. In paragraph 3 it said " huge rock formation... which resembles a human head... formed by shadows giving the illusion od eyes, nose, and mouth," this would mean that maybe it was the angle the photo was taken or the time of day.The moon could've just been turned right to make it look like eyes a nose and a mouth.It was all just an illusion.

I believe that the "face" on the moon was just a landform and nothing else. I believe that there are always answers. i believe that it is just a landform, or the cameras fault, or it's the shadows to blame.

Score: 3