Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggest that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents, but he does not support his idea that well. The author mostley stated the bad things about studying Venus and very few positive things.

The author states "Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system". This statement supports his idea but not good enough. "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation" says the author. I love this comment, but he does not eplain why he thinks this.

When I read this I disagree with the author because he puts a lot of negative information into

the aticle. "Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours" this tells us that if we wee to try this mission again we wouldn't survive, and if you add on "These conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on Earth" this is telling us we would not be able to handle it because we have never incountered such temperatures and and dangerouse acids.

The author of "Challenge of Exploring Venus" should have put more positive information into his article rather than putting a lot of negativity. The author's article was detailed and provided a lot of information, but not enough to back up his suggestion to study Venus.

Score: 3