Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I believe that the technology, Facial Action Coding System, to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable because the Facial Action Coding System only works on photos and/or artworks with a detailed face on it like the Mona LIsa artwork in the article. The technology can not read a persons face expressions right away, it needs to be generated in a computor thats constructs a 3-D model of the face(paragraph 3) which is completely rubbish because for this big of an invention to only determine emotions on a photo is quite strange and unecessary of an invention.

"The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 muscles in the model must moce like human muscles" (paragragh 3). This quote indicates that they use a 3-D technology resource to find the emotions of a photo, and if you really think about it, it is very unecessary because a person could be feeling sad in an photo but happy right after being taken, and to go through all the trouble to find a person emotional expression for that emotion to only last only an hour or so, waste of energy, money and time as I would say.

Therefore I believe the technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable at all because the article "Making Mona Lisa Smile" by Nick D'Alto does indicate that the technology is made specifically for photos and it sounds unecessary and a waste of energy to be used in real life.

Score: 3