Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Are driverless cars really that necessary? Driverless cars, in my oppion are not going to make the world better. I think that they will just make life more challenging, and will cause more problems. What is the difference between a driverless car and a normal car? Are they really driverless? Do they garrentee you saftey?

Who wants a car that is supposed to be driverless but still needs a driver? I don't think I would. A driverless car is just like a normal car that you have to control. You still have to be alert and watch the roads just as you would in a regular car. There really is no difference between a driverless car and a normal car, except one is a little more upgraded.

These new driverless cars do not garentee that you will be safe at all

times.The lawmakers say that safety is best achieved with an alert human driver. You are safer in a vehicle if you are driving rather than a robot driving. Testing computer-driven cars is illegal in most states. It is illegal because the people believe that driverless cars are not safe and will cause more accidents, and injuries.

Driverless cars are not really driverless. If they are driverless then why do the drivers have to stay alert at all times. Google has created a car that can drive in specific conditons. Google cars have driven more that half a million miles without crashes, but they are not completley driverless. Their cars can only handle certain things, and when the car can not accomplish the task it hands the task to the human, who should be ready to take over at any time.

I belive that driverless cars are not really driverless, they are not safe, and they are very similar to a normal car. So don't waste your time and money on buying a driverless car. They are not what you thought they would be.

Score: 3