Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The word "driverless" means there is no driver, the car is without a driver. Why would you want a car to drive itself when you still have to be behind the wheel, would one not just drive it themselves? Driverless cars are dangerous and prove how lazy this world is really becoming.

Driverless cars are dangerous in the ways of people abusing the fact they arent driving, thinking they can take a nap while the cars drive them or do anything other than pay attention to what the car and cars around them are doing. What is the purpose of having one of these cars when you still have to be behind the wheel and you still have to be aware of your surrondings? This car also proves to be danerous in the sense of a malfunction. What happens when the car goes out of control and gets into a car accident? Whos fault is it , the driver of the "driverless" car for not paying attention and driving, or the car itself for not knowing how to drive. Also as the article states, their would have to be many new laws put in place, new roads even. The trouble of making new laws and new roads would be pointless and honestly a waste of time and money. Where do we plan on getting this money to do so?

I find no purpose in the creating of a driverless car. It might save fuel but so will buying an electric car. Having a driverless car would be a good idea if there was really no driver like the name implies. So untill the car is proven 100 percent

safe, 100 percent driverless and the technology is proven 100 percent effective, I dont think the car is a smart idea, nor cost efffective.

Score: 3