Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
It state in the 4th and 5th paragraph " Long ago,Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could suported forms of life,venus still has features that are analogus." "NASA has compelling ideas for sending humans to study Venus.The evidence from the article support that the claim have not been proved that "Study Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers" because see the NASA having idea for you to study the the venus but nowhere in the passage that it say it is danger if you study Venus.

The article did not support the claim of studying Venus is a worthy despite the danger.NASA have ideas to have human study,Vens probablycover the ocean and its ust imagination and innovation.

In paragraph 5 NASA has compelling ideas for sending humans to study Venus.In paragraph 5 the author having the human to study the Venus from the NASA because of the danger worthy of Venus.In 4 paragraph it state "Long ago,Venus was probably covered largly with Oceans and Could Support forms of life.The support detail in this way,just say that it probably be covered with the ocean so, it still support that the article do not support the claim.In the last paragraph(paragraph 8) "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innvation now, this evidence haven't support the claim because "Studying Venus is worthly pursuit despite the dangers" is the imagintions and a false claim that the claim in the story doesn't show that it is danger to study Venus.Study the danger is not good to do or read about if it doesn't have backup support that is is danger to your life or to the world but the aricle did not support the claim nor support evidence of that claim that "Studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers."

Score: 2