Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In 2001 an image captured by NASA finally put all of our theories away, explaining why there was a face shaped rock in the red planet, or did it? Many people have came up with many theories but the most talked about one is that there is an ancient civilization who used to be in the red planet. That theory was quickly put away after NASA captured an image in 2001. The reasons why that theory was put away are, the picture that was taken in 2001 used the absolute maximum resolution, so if there were any objects in the photo such as Egyptian-style pyramids, or even a small shack you could've easily seen what they were. The picture tooken in 2001 showed that the face on mars is the martian equivalent to a butte or a mesa- landforms common around america west. If there was an ancient civilization NASA would like to tell everyone and not hide it because its better publicity for

NASA to make such a great discovery.

First of all if their was an ancient civilization that would mean they had to make shack or pyramids to live in and in the image taken in 2001 did not capture any pyramids or small shacks in photo. If it did you would've been able to see it since the image was taken with the absolute maximum resolution so it would've been easy to see what the objects were, but there were no objects. In the photo you can only see the face not any other objects and it would be really hard to live without shelter so if their was an ancient civilization there had to be pyrmaids or shacks near that face but like I said the camera did not capture any of these things.

Secondly the image taken in 2001 showed that the face on mars is martian equivilent of a butte or mesa which are landforms common around america west. Now this could be true and may explain why the face is their. Since these landforms are common around america west it wouldn't be suprising if this is just a landform of the red planet. Many scientist have came up with this theory which is the one that has more credibility.

Finally NASA would rather it be true that there was ancient civilization living in mars since they would gain publicity. NASA would not hide this information if it was true because this would make them more prestige because they would be the ones taking full credit od the discovery and would get higer rates economically speaking. They face on mars since has become a pop icon and more when it was first discovered snd even though NASA had already said thst they figured it was a lanfdform, imagine if they say there was an ancient civilization many people would give them more publicity.

In conclusion the reasons why the face is a landform and not a whole story of how their was and "ancient civilization" living in the red planet are because, the picture taken in 2001 used it absolute maximum resolution so it would've captured any pyramids or shack in the background, but it didn't, also becaus ethe image taken in 2001 showed that the face on mars is martian equivient of a butte or messa which are landforms comon in america west, and finally because it would be better for NASA if there was an ancient civilization in the red planet since all the credit for the discovery being made would go to NASA ad would potentially give them more publicity and higher rates econmically speaking. So what do you think?

Score: 4