Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Crash. That was the noise of a driverless car having a collision because its sensors did not work. With scientist creating driverless cars they are opening a new set of problems for the daily driver. There is a possiblity that it

will be hard for people to figure out who is at fault, or a driverless car could take lives do to computer problems.

When a driver less car is in a crash, who is the damage pinned on? The car or the driver? This is an issue the daily driver will have to deal with if they start putting driverless cars on the road. When we start letting driverless cars on the road it is a matter of time till one of the cars gets into a crash.

What if a driverless car kills or hits a pedestrian? The counter argument maybe that the car will not hit someone because they have sensors and cameras to not hit someone. There is a possiblity that our technology can go out or stop working and hit someone. That could cause a chain reaction of states not wanting the driverless cars in there state like California did. There is going to be flaws and glitches that need to be worked out before we can put these cars on the road.

With techonolgy advancing, scientist creating are new inventions and modernizing the old ones. Some new invertions are great, but some of them their not such great ideas. With the driverless car there is too many errors that could happen for them to be safe on the road. The cars would cause a lot of problems like it could be hard for people to figure out who is at fault, or a driverless car could take lives do to computer problems or glitches in the system. The world is not ready for driverless cars.

Score: 3