Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The FACS should not be used in the classroom. FACS can in fact help with the problem students are facing in the classes but to replace a real live teacher with a AI is just down right stupid.

We shouldn't have FACS in class rooms because the things that a teacher does such as teach, decipline, help, and believe with their students makes a huge difference in how we learn. Just like taking istep mathmatics on a computer is a stupid idea.

A part from the passage when it talks about having FACS in the class rooms was in passsage 6; it reads "A classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored." The key work in that sentence is could. Not one-hundred percent of the time are you going to get the right expression outcome from the system or student! If the system does conclude that a student bored and he or she is not and the teacher goes to address that student, that could be bad for both parties.

Another reason why I think they shouldn't put the system in schools is becuae they didn't put a lot of emotion on there. They coded it with six BASIC emotinos: happiness, suprise, andger, disgust, fear, and sadness. Yes those are the basic emotions but what if that's not the emotion were trying to put out.

It's not as valuable as it might sound to have in a classroom, in fact, its quite pointless. Reguardless, if we do get an FACS in the shools a lot of people are going to be whinning and pouting about them replacing our REAL LIVE teachers.Having FACS in schools is a waste of time money and possibly another distraction for students do deal with in the classtooms.

Score: 3