Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In 1976 the Viking one was taking photographs of Mars and it found something odd. The Viking one saw a human face on Mars. It took a picture and when the scientsts back on earth saw it they were very surprised. They concluded it was just another Martian mesa and that is what they told the public when the photo was released but many people disagreed.

The photo NASA relesed was astonashing and the people thought so too. The face on Mars quickly became popular and was in TV shows, books, magizines, and talk shows. Some believed that it was a sure sign of life on Mars or proof of an acient civilization long before us. Some even say NASA knows this and was trying to cover it up. I believe that the face on Mars is a natural landform and was not created by ailens or another form of life.

The area of Mars where the face was found is called Cydonia and these natural landforms are common there. It is clear Mars is not inhabitable and it's impossible for life to exist there. NASA said that it was a common Martian mesa and it was just how the shadows fell that gave to appearence of a nose, eyes, an mouth. This makes pefect sense considering how common the mesas are. They all look like something this one just happened to be a face. There is no evidence of ailens to create this huge artifact nor proof that it was man made.

The Face on Mars was very popular and widely known. People still disagree on how it was created but I believe it ws natural. All signs point to that. There will always be people who say it is more than a mesa and that it is an ancient ailen artifact but I think they are wrong. NASA, scientists, and thousands of people have concluded that it is a common landform and nothing more than that. I choose to believe that it was not ailens and it was by pure luck. Some believe dfferently but there is no proof to support that theory.

Score: 3