Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
When first reading over this article we can see many valid points within this arguement to help support the idea in which is that venus is a worther planet to explore as long as you look past the many dangers you will encounter doing so. We can see very helpful details to this claim such as in paragraph 3 where it is stated Venus with a thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide has one of the most corrosive atmosphere's in the solar systerm. As well as a average tempature of over 800 degrees fahrenheit and a atmospheric pressure of over 90 times stronger than that of earths. As you can see very valid points to the danger you will face to researching this waste land of a planet so why would someone waste such good time and resources for research on a planet we may never even get to inhabit? Which is where paragraph 4 comes in stating reasoning such as the sister planet to earth could have supported life so long ago and to find such evidince would be ground breaking not only for human kind, but as well as mother nature itself.

Score: 2