Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the article, the author states that, while Venus may be extreamly dangerous, studying Venus would be a worthy persuit for scientists. In paragraph 3 of the article the author describes the many dangers on Venus and how those dangers would effect attempts to study it's surface, these dangers include an atmosphere that is almost 97 percent carbon diocide, clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venuses atmosphere, a surface temperature of over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and an atmosheric pressure level that is 90 times greater than here on Earth. While the author clearly explains the dangers of Venus, in paragraph 4 he states reasons of why Venus should be studied. In his reasons he states that Venuses surface is a lot like Earths, with valleys, mountains, and craters. The author also states that some scientists believe Venus, at one point of time, may have been able to support various forms of life like our Earth,

In paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 the author explains scientists theories on how to send humans to study Venus without having to worry about the ground level dangers. One of these theories consists of having the scientists float 30 or so miles above Venuses surface and studying the planet from there. While this theory keeps the scientist safe from Venuses harsh conditions it also provides them with very limited information about Venuses surface, provided that most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere rendering photography and videography records of Venuses surface useless. While this theory seems unable to work out, that doesn't stop scientist from thinking of more ways to study Earths "twin".

In the final paragraph of the article the author states that studying Venus will not only allow us to learn more about the planet itself, but it is likely to lead us to discover newer ways to conquer the harsh enviroments of other planets and continue to learn more about the vast universe we live in.

Score: 3