Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
It's a beautiful summer's day when you decide to go for a drive. Driving through your neighborhood, children play, birds chrip, and neighbors give one another warm greetings. A dog runs into the road. Your first instinct is to do anything you can not to hit it. Would a car have this same instinct not to end a life.

If we have driverless cars, it would hurt pur economy. It would put many people out of jobs. These could be such as mechanics, taxi drivers, automotive testers, and maybe even gas stations. Also, new roads woul have to be built costings towns countless dollars for the new "smart-road systems" in order for the vehicle to work.

However, if there was no longer a need for gas it could save our COUNTRY even more dollars by not having to spend millions on oil from other countries. But what if these technology advances and our country's war enemies get a hold of it. Creating driverless tanks, plans, and myabe some kind of robot. But if we could create these, our military would be at its peak. Saving the lives of many of our own.

Referring back to my first paragraph, I do not believe driverless cars should be allowed in the United States or anywhere. Cars do not have feelings, or instincts,

to stop themselves from crashing into nother car or running over an animal or possibly even a person. Of course, there are probably ways to avoid these by programming the car. But what if the car malfunctions, or the progamming isn't put in right. The cost of a driverless car does not trump the infinte cost of a life.

Score: 3