Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In the argument about the Face being a natural landform, I think it`s a natural landform because it could have (over time) been hit by a weather storm like meteor or asteroid . In the passage it says," There was no alien monument after all."

That means no aliens build the Face it`s all natural.

The Face is a natural landform because it could have been it by in meteor or astroid. In outer space, there are high chances of meteors or asteriods hitting a planet like Mars, Jupiter, or even Earth. When an asteriod or meteor hit the planet,

it can physically or chemically change the surroundings of a planet. A meteor or astroid could have hit Mars; made the physical feature of Mars look like a face. It is natural for a planet getting hit by a meteor or ateriod or any type of weather storm like hurricans, earthqwakes, or even tornadoes.

In an earthqwake, the planet shakes. On Earth building falls, ground moves, and ground will leave cracks or damage. On Mars, rocks will fall and will make the illusion of a face. It will leave damage in the ground, leaving cracks in the face. This could also happen it make the Face on Mars. It is also natural.

I believe the Face is a natural landform. The results in the passage says" There was no alien monument after all."

An asteriod or meteor could have hit Mars before 1976. There could have been other natural causes like earthqwakes,storms, or erosion. So, the Face is a natural landform and that is were I stand on the argument.

Score: 2