Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
in the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" It talks about driveless cars and how it postive and negative to the cars. I think the postives side put up a good argument but I honest have to side with the negative becasue its aruments are what seem right to me.

Well like it stated in the article that who's to blame when something bad happends that's excatly why there shouldn't be cars like that. If there is then then we wouldn't know who to blame any more because if we keep on casusing accident's and we go to court and man gets blamed for the fault of the manufacturer. Then the man who was balemed in the first place can sue or something like that for getting blamed because of the manufacturers fault. But sitll theres no one to blame that what its comes down to when we really think about it.

Even if the got safety features i think its a pretty ingnorant idea to make a drive less car becasue were not perfect either way. So if we make these cars there would be no accidents, yeah right were are no perfect so these cars can never be perfection. So when we try out these cars frist time we might be like its nice nit having to drive when drving litteraly putting your foot down and streing come on people are we that lazy that we can't even do anything for are selfs anymore even if we could take control sometimes with the driveless cars it doesn't mean all the time so yeah america's really lazy we can't even put are foot down and turn a stering wheel to drive anymore wow america thanks.

Either way these are the reason why i don't think is a good idea to have drives less cars because there's no one to blame if someone gets hurt driving or getting hit by the car and that its just really lazy of us to even think of drivng as a hassle but i guess some people do so yeah but either way drive less cars are point less.

Score: 2