Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
That isn't a face. This was made by aliens. This what some people might have said when they heard about a face being on Mars. The first picture was taken in 1976.The picture was taken by a spacecraft named Viking 1. I believe that the face is just a natural landform and is not made by aliens.

First, in the passage it tells you that when they first looked at the image it shocked them. They thought to themselves that it looked like a face. Then, from the minute people saw the photo everyone agreed and called it a face, but no one knew how it formed.

Next, there was a disscussion amoung scientist about the face. Few scienctist believed that it was an alien artifact. So from reading this I take the einfitive to believe that the face isn't made by an alien. It is just a natural landform created.

From reading the passage it also gives proof to why it couldn't be an alien artifact. For example, the pictures, it shows you the different and sharper pictures the spacecraft took and as you go along and you see the 2001 picture you see that the picture doesn't look like a face anymore and just looks like a natural landform.

Another example is in the last paragraph, when Jim Garvin, chief scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program, said That the picture actuallly shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa, which are landforms that are commonly around the American West.

In conclusion, there is a lot of proof to why the face that was found on Mars isn't an alien artifact, but is a natural landform. The pictures show it and it mentions it in a couple of paragraphs to why it couldn't be a face. So in the end, the face is just a natural landform not a face or an alien artifact.There isn't enough facts or data to prove that the face is an artifact.

Score: 3