Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Natural land forms are mistaken for 'alien activity' all of the time. Why should this time be any different. It is simply a natural landform.

There have been other natural mesas on Mars that have been mistaken for alien monuments. The rock formation is not even in the actual face, it is the shadows that the rocks ceate when the sun hits them just right. There was a storm that clouded the Face, so the details have been obscured.

There has been no other proof of aliens, only rambungcous conspiericy theorists. If we had more proof of extra terrestrial life, the theory of the Face would be more believable. In the American West, we have landforms that are common to Martian buttes or mesas. "It reminds me most f Middle Butte in Snake River Plain of Idaho. That's a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars," says Chief scientist for NASA's Mars Explorations Program, Jim Garvin. The cheif scientist believes that the Face is a natural landform, and that he compares it to natural landmarks on Earth.

More evidence can and will be provided. "As a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size," sayes Garvin. "So, if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egytian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they were." With modern cameras, we can see the precise details, and with clear sky over the Face, it proves that the Face is just another natural land form.

We know of other natural land forms on Mars, illusions of shadows, no other proof of aliens, similar to natural land forms on Earth, it would be simple to find little details, and with modern cameras, that take sharper pitures proves that the Face is just a natural landform, not alien activity.

Score: 3