Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
~How far would you consider too far? I ask this question for the sake of driverless cars that are starting to become a thing and starting to be tested. They already have been considered illegal in some states, California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia. These have some positive aspects, but for now we are going to look at the negative aspects of driverless cars.

~These cars have many sensors, a few cameras, auto brakes/accelorators, and GPS', but if the wiring is wrong or anyhting happens to them, they will malfunction and could easily cause serious injuries or even death. The GPS' would need to be updated every-so-often because new roads are built and some roads are closed. If the GPS is not updated, then you could easily go off road or not even be on a considered road. Some GPS, like one that i own, is very old and does not have some of the newer roads on it, but it has only roads that do not exist anymore.

~"Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?" is a good question because I know i really like to drive and be focused with just driving and the radio. Most drivers also really like to drive on their own and be in contol of the car, going fast, or slow, and stopping. A manufacturer said there would be "in-car entertainment", but if you think of that there could be so many things that are considered "in-car entertainment". Kids, if they are in the car, then they could easily have a movie player playing like some family cars have. If the adult has something other than a radio, it could actually be more dangerous than what they think. This is because the warning signs, depending what they are could be ignored if they are distrcted with other things.

~Warning signs. Some may think they will help and get the drivers attention, but others may disagree. The warning sign of a voice going throughout the car and making everything else stop playing is a very good idea. The other examples of the warning signs that were mentioned were not so good. A vibrating seat could easily have a person thinking, if they are on a bumpy road, that it was just a bump and not the seat/car telling them to get the wheel and go around what ever is in the way. Flashing lights could easily be blown off as another car flashing their brights and not think as much of "oh, I need to start driving!" They would more-than-likely think that their brights are on and they should turn them off.

~Technology breaks and we all know it. If one thing were to break or stop working, the person, in the driverless car, and anyone around them is in possibly a lot of danger and the driver is puting others and him/herself at risk. The car is wired up and probably carefully looked at, but if one were to actully buy one they would not know if something is broken or messed up. The technology most likely has batteries and they all probably need to be replaced every once in a while or charged, but if someoen forgets to... then the car will not be working properly

~Who's fault would it be if someone were to get in a crash? the company or the driver? This question struck me and made me think. I thought it would be the companies at first, but then i thought a bit more and cme up with a conclusion: If the person owns the car and paid for it and everything, it would be the owner of the cars' fault because they knew what they were getting themselves into." The companies might be at a bit of a fault, but not much. The fault would be the owner/driver of the car.

~In the end, i still think of this driverless car as a very negative thing. It make use less gas, but it will not be less of a danger. There are already things on the road (drunk drivers, car chases, etc.) that we all have to deal with, so why put another danger onto the road and put us all into more risk than we already are?

Score: 5