Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I do not believe the development of the driverless car is a good idea. The creating process would be too expensive. Most of the "driverless" cars today still need a person to operate at certain points.

In the 1950's General Motors made a test track and concept car. They placed electrical cables that sent radio signals to a reciever on the front of the car. Engineers at Berkely did something similar but with magnets. And although it worked it would need major updatese to existing roads that is way to expensive to be done. Driverless cars may seem like a good and safe alternative but they're too expensive.

Google has had cars that can drive themself since 2009, but these cars can only operate under certain conditions. And there still needs to be a driver for pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues. So "driverless" cars still technically need a driver to preform certain tasks.

BMW made the "Traffic Jam Assistant" that can drive up to 25 mph, but it still needs a driver to have their hands on the wheels at all time. None of the cars that have been developed so far are completely driverless. Some cars can steer, accelerate, and brake themeselves but still alert the driver when human skills are needed.

"Driverless" cars are too impractical to be developed. They are too expensive, and most of the time still require a human driver to assist.

Score: 3