Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author supports his idea on why we should study Venus despite the dangers it presents is because acording to the story Venus is often referred to as Earth's "twin." Another thing the article says is that Venus is the closest planet to Earth beause of the density and size. Venus also used to be covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life.

I think we should study Venus despite the dangers because it used to be the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. We can also study it so it can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, but it will take a while to get there. There are also downsides like how will people live in Venus if it is too hot for us to live there or it'll still be hard for researchers to study Venus because researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else because they cannot touch the ground otherwise they will burn. There may be some solutions to study Venus a little bit more because according to NASA they have an idea in which it involves a vehicle. It will look like a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape. The vehicle will be hovering over Venus to avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way. Although the temperatures will be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit and the air pressure will be a little strong, it will still be survivable for humans.

Those are the reasons on why I agree with the author suggesting that we should study venis despite all the dangers the planet has.

Score: 3