Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
The author suggests that studying Venus is worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents, I strongly disagree because the author did not provided more proofs on why we should go to Venus despite the dangers it presents. The author provided more cons than pros to support his answer.

The author he/she did not provided enough information to support his/her idea on going to Venus. It provided more cons, in the aricle it says, "Temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit,and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our plant. These conditions are far more exterme than anything humans encounter on Earth." (The Challenge of Exploring Venus 3).

This shows how the author did not support their own answers insead of providing more pros he/she provided more cons, I strongly disagree that we should go to Venus cause no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours so what makes you think a human can survive that with more than 800 degrees Fahrenheit, so overall I do not think Venus should be worthy pursuit despite it's dangers because no human would survive.

Score: 2