Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Would you buy a driverless car? The negative aspect in driving driverless cars is that they need lots of senors, they cant help get througth road work or traffic and the technology can fail.

Manufactures are starting to use smart cars. Smart cars that are considered driveless. Theses smart cars needs lots of sensors that makes then able to drive without the company of humans. Google has made a driverless car that has senors on the wheels of the car and on the roof of the car. Even though senors have been around since the 1980's and have advanced since then, the senors that are on the brakes of the car can reduce the power in your engine.the senors reduce the engine because it takes a lot of power on your car. you need the power you can get from your engine just in case you're in a bad sitution. Not only driveless cars need lots of senors they arent able to help through nagativing through road work and heavy traffic.

Driveless cars arent really driverless when you think about it. Driverless cars need the assitanants of humans to pull out of a driveway. They also need help with heavy traffic issues. Driverless cars can not go through roadwork areas without humans navating them through it. Driverless cars arent that much help when it comes to things it should know how to do.Whats the point of having a driverless car if it cant help you through traffic and others thing pretaining to driving? Not only they cant help youin traffic or road work , What if the technology fails?

In the article the authour talks about how the technology can fail.

In traffic laws it says nothing about how if your computer in your fails during a crash, it talks about how the driver iss responisble for the car and not being able to control it. In the article it says ," Traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. In some states driverless cars are already considered illegal for that reason. Who would be responsible if theres a crash , the driver or the manufacture? Its better to limit the use of driverless cars because cars who be more safe in the control of a human driver.

Its better not to have driverless cars. It will much safer for people to not have driverless cars because it would most likely have a high number of car crashes and injured people if a car didnt have an actul driver behide the wheel.

Score: 4