Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driveless cars should never exist because, it is dangerous, it is not exactly perfect, and it is time consuming. Driving driveless cars is pointless. Even though technology has advanced and became more efficient, we still don't have the technology needed to ensure the drivers safety. According to the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" in paragraph 9, technology could fail and someone could get injured. Would it be the driver's fault or the manufacturer?

If you're going to invent and call a car, a driveless car, why does it still require a human to drive it? Yes I know that, the article in paragraph 7 says that you're only required to do so if the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones or around accidents. But what's the point if you're going to do that? It is a waste of time and money. It is not exactly perfect. If driveless cars ever exist in the future, the price of the car would be very high and almost no one would be able to afford it. It won't be the future way of transportation.

But if everyone could afford it, laws would have to change. The article says, in paragraph 9, that most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer driven cars. The aritlce also says, in paragraph 9, "But even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to covor liability in case of an accident". The whole process will be time consuming and that's why, I think that driveless cars should never exist. Companies and manufacturers should focus on making the car better in terms of handling, engine, and etc.

Score: 3