Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driverless cars are one of many inventions that can rock the human world. However, that does not mean driverless cars should be developed. I firmly stand against driverless cars, because of the safety and liability of them.

Safety is and has always been the number one priority on the road. The use of driverless cars, does not add up to safety. Stated from paragraph 9, lawmakers know that safety is best with alert drivers "Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieve with alert drivers" (9). In order for lawmakers to know this, imense study and research must have been put into the safety topic. Despite being such a advanced piece of technology driverless cars can not perform well enogh for real time situations "They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills..." (7). This statement alone proves that driverless cars have a major safety fault. There are countless scenerios on the road which driverless cars can simply not be programmed to handle, thus not safe enough for the road.

Liability with driverless cars, is just unimaginable. People today already debate enough when they are in accidents. Who takes responsibilty for driverless cars, the driver or manufacturer? The amount of cases for accidents with driverless cars would take up some much time and effort, people would turn back to driving regular cars.

With safety and liability, driverless cars are to much risk, for the amount of time and money invested into them. Yes, driverless cars would be cool, but at the end of the day we must face reality and see the bigger picture.

Score: 4