Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Mesa, Not A Human

The face that was found on Mars is most likely just a regular landform that forms on rocky planets. I don't think it was created by aliens, and this is my reasoning for why I think this.

First, knowing that this face was made in the rocks of Mars, that is a clear exploit that it is a natural rocky landform. In the images of the face that the Viking 1 rover had taken on Mars in 2001, it turns out that it doesn't look like much of a head after all. In addition, the whole thing was purposely meant to attract the public and bring attention to Mars, and it did. Also, in April 5, 1998, scientists took pictures of the landform and even said that it was revealed that the Face was a natural landform and there was no alien monument after all.

Next, the rover had snapped a picture, but the scientists say that it had to look down through wispy clouds to see the Face. And it became a pop icon. It had appeared in books, movies, magazines, radio talk shows. The Face was just all talk. And according to the article, some think that this is bona fied evidence of life on Mars, but scientist have figured out it probably isn't. It was really another Martian mesa that were pretty common around Cydonia.

Some might say that this actually is evidence of life on Mars. And they might go deeper into the reseach themselves, and according to the article the shadows did make it look like an actual human face, however that is the thing. It was the shadows. The unusual shadows were what made it look like a face, specifically an Egyptian pharoah.

Therefore, the Face that was found on Mars wasn't a human head, but yet another Martian equivalent of a mesa or butte. And it was the same height as the the Middle Butte on Earth, So it must've been just a natural landform on Mars that formed and looked like a face. It was simply a deception and a coincidence.

Score: 3