Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
How valuable would a Facial Action Coding System in a classroom actually be? What kind of actions should take place after the information is recorded? Finaly, what other "great" sounding eduacational sytems that used new technology actually work ? In the classroom i have seen new processes like this one come and go usually not making it to the next generation of students. As a current student this comes from a first hand source on how technologies like this one are repetetive and seem forced onto modern eduacation.

Lets say an F.A.C.S were implemeted into the classroom and its program showed that students were about 40% happy. The next day the teacher decides to change up his method of teaching but couldnt satisfy the students enough to boost the percentages. This would become repetetive and translate into something that just feels like an extra step in eduacation because the teacher is forced to give feedback to the board and grow upon the bad percentages. This scenario sounds common due to the extra steps necesary to fulfill the technologies potential.

When learning something new information must be repeated to one's self more than one time to ensure that they remember better. This is not allways fun it takes hard work to fully

understand a topic. The simpler the learning process, the easier it is to learn. The emotions one feels when studying does not contradict if they will actually learn it or not. Following through with the process will show results if they are willing to pull through. Facial sensors are not needed to show how hard learning is.

Cost of the product will also affect the schools funds that could be used to do much more. Also to put one system in each classroom is an outrages idea.That much money could be used to improve schools in much better ways like having updated text books new uniforms for school teams or repairs on thebuilding.

The F.A.C.S

Score: 4