Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Having cars without drivers are a big deal because according to "Google cofounder Sergey Brin Can. He envisions a future with a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars form a public-transport taxi sytem". (Paragraph 1). Instead of having drivers in every car, whose drivers are teens, parents, elderly, disabled, drunk who are driving everyday, having a car without them driving would make their lives easier which would reduce the deadly automobile accidents that are reported everyday. I am not against the development of these cars, but in fact I am in support of the development because instead of having different drivers in different cars who are driving everyday, having driverless cars would provide more organized styems and more cautious sensors in the cars, which would lead to a safer environment whether inside the car or outside the car, while making a transprtation.

In the second paragraph it states "Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009. Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash" (Paragraph 2). It explains that the cars has driven a million miles without any crashes. Having driverless cars also would only use half the fuel of today's taxis. I believe if the companies put more researches on the cars especially when dealing with traffic issues, and if government allows them to test the cars more often, it would lead to another better, and successful step to allow driverless cars in the future world.

In conclusion, I am for the development of the driverless cars because they are more safe and they would offer less complelxion for the drivers. Just like there are robots being invented, the cars would also be able to drive without drivers.

Score: 3