Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Personally, I feel that the technology called the Facial Action Coding System is not valuable. It may seem interesting that a computer can tell what emoitons someone one is feeling, but it doesn't make it valuable. We can also tell what emotions people feel too.

This technology that they are using only calculates what emotions they feel. For example, in the first paragraph it says, "She's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry." They've used a computer to analyze what the Mona Lisa was feeling in the portrait. The computer predicted but is not all accurate. She might have felt more fearful than happy. Most facial expressions are universal. That meaning, that if someone smiles you can't think right off the bat that they are happy. They may feel hurt therefore not so happy as you thought.

What's the point of the technology if us humans can tell how a friend is feeling, based on the look of their face. We may not be 100 percent accurate, but we may know how they feel. For example, say you've known someone for a while now, you would probably know what their expressions look like. The only thing you won't know what their thinking but you will know what they feel. Another thing we have an advantage on, is the way our friend speaks. Emotion isn't just based on our looks, it can be based off of the way we speak too.

On the other hand, I also feel that the technology can useful too. I feel that it can be well used in painting espically in a portrait. I say that because it can be difficult to see what a person felt in the portrait. The technology that they use can be used to scan the portrait and tell us what they might have felt. It can go though a deep scan and could scan the 40 major muscles that we have on our face that shows our expression.

In conclusion, I personally feel that the technology called the Facial Action Coding System is not valuable. Eventhough we can't fully tell what somone is feeling we can still predict. The technology that they use is also predicting. It's just more accurate. Therefore it's not all that useful to us.

Score: 3