Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Twenty five years ago a shadowy likness of a human face was found when circling the planet for a land site. This shadowy figure that was spotted was just a landform formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and a mouth. But others say the "Face on Mars" was an alien artifact. This "Face on Mars" has certainly recieved attention from viewers saying its an alien artifact, or its just a landform.

Scientists figured out that this "Face on Mars" was just another Martian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, but only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh. On April 5, 1998, Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera snapped a picture ten times sharper that the original Viking photos. The results also turned out to be a natural landform. But not everyone still believes that.

This "Face on Mars" was having pictures taken of it in April (winter on Mars). The camera on board had to peer through wispy clouds to see the face. "Alien markings were hidden by haze," said the Skeptics. People that still believed that this was an ancient artifact would not stop trying to prove it to the people who believed it was a landform.

"Malin's team captured an extraordinary photo using the cameras absoulte maximum resolution," said Gavin. "So if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they were!" In conclusion to that statement, this "Face of Mars" is just a landform that has extreme fades of illusion, nothing more, and nothing less.

Score: 3