Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
I am against driverless cars for three reasons. they are not fully driverless, they cant fully navagate of thier own, and if the car make a mistake and hit something it would be the driver's fault.

The first reason why i am against the developement of driverless cars is the car is not fully driverless. there is no point of a car that drives on its own if you still have to turn and navigate through construction on you own. if there was to be a car that drives on its on it should be able to fully drive on its own. the driverless car cant controll it's self. it cant control when to stop before hitting somethin.

The second reason why i am against the driverless car is the car cant fully navigate. so you still have to stop for padestrians. if the car cant navigate you still have to stop and take control of the car. i would if i was to have a driverless car i wouldnt want to still have to take controll, i would want to get what i paid for.

The third reason why i am against the driverless car is if you hit something or somebody you will still be held responsible. in paragraph nine it states "lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers. driverless cars are more dangerous and thats why it is illigal to drive computer-driven cars

in most states. "california, nevada, florida and the district of columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi-autonomous cars"

In conclusion i am against the driverless car because they are not fully driverless, they can not fully navigate on their own, and if the driver make a mistake and hit something, even though the car drive on its own, it would still be the driver's fault.

Score: 3