Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
Driveless cars are, in many way, pointless to the human species. This article shows both the negative and the positive side of having driverless cars, but what about the things that really matter. Having a driverless car could take a lot of time to function, people would begin to become lazy and not worry about their safety, and to top it all off, the world has bigger problems than needing a driverless car.

Somewhere along the way, almost everything falls apart. Just a normal car alone was diffucult to bulid and a driverless one would be even worse. Think about it, millions and millions of dollaers would go into building one sample model, just to replace one that's already been fail in a driving test. That's a large waste of time and in most cases, if the car turns out to work, it'd cost too much and would only sale with the higher class of the world. A driverless car would be unnesscary if only a certain class of people are using it.

Driverless cars would also cause a insrease in health problems. Most of the world's, Amercians mostly, have a population of majority overweight indivudals. Most of which who can't drive a car. If driverless cars were to be invented and functioning, this would bring an increase to the amount of citizens who don't drive or choose not to drive. Now, undersanding that there are some elderly who can't drive, then the car would be benfitual for them, but as for the others, that's just pure laziness.

Another thing, there are more problems in the world than having driverless cars. Wars, poverty, hunger, and unemployment are just a few. Sure there could be a few good outcomes from having a driverless car, but what would they be? The world needs more that just some machine that can drives itsself. We need someting that's going to help the environment and save people and this car isn't going to do either of those things.

Score: 3