Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
This software is not valuable to others. The software seems pointless because why would you want to know a certain percent of how happy someone is? People can tell the emotions of people without using this software whatsoever.

In paragraph five the author says "you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on their face" which is totally true but you can also tell how your friends are feeling by talking to them face to face and not "calculating" their emotions on computers.

In paragraph six it is said "while it shows just how much computers can do" but some computers can mess up a persons emotion and take it in a completely different direction by making someone think the person is unhappy but they could've been having the time of their life.

Why would anyone need to know exactly how happy someone is? People can show emotions through many differnt ways and not just through their face but through communication, body language, the tone of voice they have.

In a classroom setting children do not need to use this because a part of growing up kids shouldn't be exposed to too much technology. Children shouldn't learn how to read others feelings/ emotions through a computer. What good would come from that? Learning how to profile others is a good trait of having. Forensic scientists don't even use this software so why should we?

Overall this new software does not seem valuable to students, teens, or adults. It just shows how attached we are to technology. Yes, good things can come from technology but also pointless things can too. People need to live in the moment and not turn to their computer every second they have. We should be more worried about more important events going on in this world before calculating how happy the whole world is.

Score: 3