Rate the following essay on its writing, argument, and language skills:
In this article the author explains how it would be a worthy pursuit to explore Venus but some what dangerous for humans. Based on this article the author does a good job evaluating the task for humans to seek exploring Venus. Some strong points the author brought to my attention is that the ground level temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater then earth. In most cases, a temperature of 800 degrees Fahrenheit would melt anything and a atmospheric pressure that is 90 times what we experience would crush us and anything that we would bring to it. The author suggest a method that would fix that obsticle, the author says if we were to fly a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles we would be able to survive in Venus.

A couple things that the author didn`t bring to my attention was the cost and time it would take of the misson. In the article the author gives us a method of how we would be able to suvive in Venus, but the author did not inform us about the cost and time. In my opinion I would feel like the mission would cost a lot of money,

time and to build the mission . Another obsticles that the author did not bring to my attention is how would the fueling system work if we can not touch the surface of Venus. Would we be able to carry enough fuel from earth to venus and back all without touching the surface of Venus? I still support the claim the author is trying to show us but is it enough to have NASA use it as a method to venture Venus? The important part of exploring a new planet would be be taking samples of rock, gas and other things that would point us to the direction of finding a way to make venus survivable, but the author brought it to my attention that we would not be able to do such thing. My conclusion to this method is it would be a good way to venture a new plant but it has more obsticles then just the article suggest.

Score: 3