Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 80fe9eee-2d6e-4a7e-b7dd-ec23aab2d39f
Document Type: srp
Title: STRATEGIES AND GUIDANCE TO ADDRESS LOSS OF LARGE AREAS OF
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1211/ML121110138.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
957; March 27, 2009). The statement of considerations also states that the mitigation strategies employed by new reactors as required by the rule also need to account for, as appropriate, the specific features of the plant design, or any design changes made as a result of an aircraft impact assessment that are performed in accordance with the Commission’s Aircraft Impact Assessment rule 10 CFR 50.150. New reactor applicants 19.4-13 Revision 0 – May 2013 and new holders of a COL may have additional safety and design features and functions beyond those of operating reactors. The effects of these additional features and design differences on the original guidance in NEI 06-12, Revision 2 are addressed through the additional guidance found in NEI 06-12, Revision 3 which is beyond that developed for current power reactor licensees. 2. Section 52.80(d) requires a COL applicant to submit a description and plans for implementation of the guidance and strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the LOLAs of the plant due to explosions or fire as required by Section 50.54(hh)(2). Section 50.34(i) requires operating license applicants under 10 CFR Part 50 to submit descriptions and plans for implementation of the guidance and strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities as required by Section 50.54(hh)(2). III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the NRC staff should review the applicant=s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Section II of this SRP. For each type of submittal, the NRC staff will conduct the