Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a387e63b-f08f-4013-a693-4fa080d0bff9
Document Type: srp
Title: and BTP 11-5.  Supporting information on the staff’s evaluation of
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15027A302.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
dose analyses are not consistent with the BTP acceptance criteria, the applicant should propose technical specifications limiting the total amount of radioactivity in waste gas components. The maximum inventory of radioactive materials, in the event of an uncontrolled release of radioactivity, is based on that quantity of radioactivity that would not exceed the SRP dose acceptance criteria due to inhalation and immersion exposure pathways at the EAB. Chapter 16, Section 5.5, “Programs and Manuals,” of the FSAR addresses this commitment in COL applications. The milestones for the development and implementation of such plant- and site--specific requirements are addressed in FSAR Sections 11.5 and 13.4 of COL applications. II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The acceptance criteria, as doses determined at the EAB, remain unchanged from the prior version of BTP 11-5. Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 61 was noted in the guidance as it relates to the consequence analyses conducted under SRP Section 11.3 using BTP 11-5. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The review procedures section was updated in recognition of the revisions identified in the areas of review and acceptance criteria sections, as noted in explanations above. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation findings section was revised by adding a new subsection. The new subsection discusses the results of the staff’s evaluation and conclusion of acceptability BTP 11-5-13 Revision 4 – January 2016 with the guidance of the BTP and its acceptance criteria. The revisions address the following factors: 1. With respect to the consequence analysis addressing the radiological impact from a waste gas system leak or failure, the revision provides more specific guidance on how the staff would confirm that the applicant has provided the results of a site-specific analysis that are consistent with the acceptance criteria of SRP Section 11.3 and BTP 11-5. Supporting information on the staff’s evaluation of the site’s