Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 51f36446-2ac9-4fa5-a60e-0b36c7db3df2
Document Type: srp
Title: LIGHT LOAD HANDLING SYSTEM (RELATED TO REFUELING)
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0703/ML070380200.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.1.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
wer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 6. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. 9.1.4-7 Revision 3 - March 2007 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The LLHS includes all components and equipment for moving fuel and other related light loads between the receiving area, storage areas, and reactor vessel. After review of the applicant’s proposed LLHS design criteria, design bases, and requirements for safe operation, the staff concludes that the design of the LLHS and supporting systems complies with NRC regulations in GDCs 2, 5, 61, and 62. This conclusion is based on the following findings: 1. The system design meets GDC 2 requirements for protection of safety-related equipment and spent fuel from the effects of earthquakes. Criterion 2 is met because the system is designed in accordance with RG 1.29 Position C.1 for safety-related portions and Position C.2 for nonsafety-related portions of the system. 2. The system meets GDC 5 requirements for sharing of SSCs because such sharing does not impair the system’s safety function. 3. The system also meets the requirements of GDCs 61 and 62 for prevention