Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: e6522906-ea8a-4279-a417-3ba3eec01014
Document Type: esrp
Title: URANIUM FUEL CYCLE IMPACTS
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Primary—Appendix B Secondary—Appendix B I. AREAS OF REVIEW This environmental standard review plan (ESRP) directs the staff’s review to comply with 10 CFR 51.51,(a) “Uranium fuel cycle environmental data - Table S-3,” as the basis for the staff’s evaluation of the environmental effects of the uranium fuel cycle. Review Interfaces The reviewers for this ESRP should obtain input from and provide input to reviewers for the following ESRP: ` ESRP 10.4.2. Provide a statement, if appropriate, that the environmental impacts of the uranium fuel cycle, as given in Table 5.7-A-1 and in relationship to the proposed project, appear to have little significance and would not alter the overall benefit-cost balance. (a) The table has been further updated to reflect the changes contained in Attachment A to the Fuel Cycle Rulemaking Hearing Board’s Conclusions and Recommendations of the Hearing Board Regarding the Environmental Effects of the Uranium Fuel Cycle, Docket No. RM 50-3, dated October 26, 1978 (NRC 1996). NUREG-1555 5.7-2 October 1999 Data and Information Needs The type of data and information needed will be affected by site- and station-specific factors, and the degree of detail should be modified according to the anticipated magnitude of the potential impacts. The following data or information should be obtained. ` Table S-3 of Paragraph (a) of 10 CFR 51.51. The current amendment (as given in 49 FR 9381, March 12, 1984 and 49 FR 10922, March 23, 1984) is included in Appendix A to this ESRP as Table 5.7-A-1.(a) The reviewer should ensure that the most recent amendment of Table S-3 has been provided as input to the EIS and should update the staff analysis given in Appendix A to this ESRP when necessary. The reviewer should also ensure that all conclusions given in Appendix A are appropriate for the proposed project. II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptance criteria for the evaluation of the impacts of the uranium fuel cycle are based on the