Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a6fb41ee-7d52-4c71-82e1-7bc60ac6087a
Document Type: srp
Title: APPLICABLE CODE CASES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1608/ML16088A219.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.2.1.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
hnical resolution of unresolved safety issues and medium and high-priority generic safety issues which are identified in the version of NUREG- 0933 current on the date up to 6 months before the docket date of the application and which are technically relevant to the design; (2) demonstrate how the operating experience insights have been incorporated into the plant design; and, (3) provide information necessary to demonstrate compliance with any technically relevant portions of the Three Mile Island requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.34(f), except paragraphs 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1)(xii), 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(ix), and 10 CFR 50.34 (f)(3)(v). These cross-cutting review areas should be addressed by the reviewer for each technical subsection and relevant conclusions documented in the corresponding SER section. 2. For reviews of DC and COL applications under 10 CFR Part 52, the NRC staff verifies that Section 5.2.1.2 of the applicant’s submitted documentation specifies the use of ASME Code Cases that are included in revisions to RGs 1.84, 1.147, and 1.192 5.2.1.2-7 Final Revision 4 – December 2016 incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a. The staff also checks the table provided by the DC applicant identifying the applied ASME Code Cases for compliance with RGs 1.84, 1.147, and 1.192. 3. For ASME Code Cases pertaining to ASME BPV Code, Section III, Division 2, as well as for other Code Cases not previously accepted in RG 1.84, 1.147, or 1.192, the NRC staff reviews the request by the applicant to apply those Code Cases as an alternative to the ASME Code requirements in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a. The NRC staff will review ASME Code Cases proposed by the applicant as alternatives to the ASME Code requirements for authorization based on the considerations specified in 10 CFR 50.55a(z). For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site