Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a8853b5a-7119-4e4d-8880-496c64ff5b6c
Document Type: srp
Title: INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS - INTRODUCTION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1602/ML16020A050.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
taff approval. When differences exist between prior approvals, the differences should be identified and the review should confirm that an adequate basis has been provided. The review should include an evaluation of the differences to confirm that they are acceptable. 7. If the proposed I&C systems employ technologies that have not previously been accepted by the staff, the reviewer should identify these technologies and establish a basis for acceptance prior to proceeding with the review. 8. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit, or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report, or topical report). 9. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report (SER). The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. The applicant or licensee has identified the I&C systems that are important to safety in accordance with RG 1.206, “Combined License