Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 7916b088-fb90-4163-84fe-027bd315bcc5
Document Type: srp
Title: REVIEW OF RISK INFORMATION USED TO SUPPORT PERMANENT PLANT-
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0717/ML071700658.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
us guidance in SRP Chapter 19.0 and make minor editorial changes. In addition, this SRP section was administratively updated in accordance with NRR Office Instruction, LIC-200, Revision 1, “Standard Review Plan (SRP) Process.” The revision also adds standard paragraphs to extend application of the updated SRP section to prospective submittals by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52, as appropriate. Review Responsibilities - Reflects changes in review branches resulting from reorganization and branch consolidation. Changes are reflected throughout the SRP. 1. Moved footnote into the text to improve clarity. 2. Updated Review Responsibilities to reflect NRO guidance. I. AREAS OF REVIEW None II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA None III. REVIEW PROCEDURES 1. Deleted previous footnote and added a reference to SRP Section 19.1 in the text to reflect’s the staff’s current position on the use of industry peers reviews. 2. Deleted previous footnote and added a reference to RG 1.200 in the text to reflect the fact that RG 1.200 is the current vehicle used by the staff to endorse industry PRA standards. 3. Changed the previous footnote of Table III-1 into a note immediately following the title to improve clarity. 4. Added item to Table III-1, "Questions to Assist in Establishing the Cause-Effect Relationship" for Low Power and Shutdown PRA, "Does the application affect the ability for the operator to close containment?" To be consistent with the risk insights identified in SECY 97-168. 5. Changed the previous footnote of Figure III-1 into a note to improve clarity. 6. Changed the previous footnote of Figure III-2 into a note to improve clarity. 19.2-87 June 2007 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS Revised to indicate that reviewers should verify the information provided by the applicant and conduct review activities in order to support the conclusion(s) reached, rather than simply providing example language for stating the conclusion(s) without also indicating the need to provide the