Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 667d1b37-702c-4e8d-93da-886dbb7a679f
Document Type: srp
Title: d.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070304.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.2.2.30
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.51 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided that his the evaluation 52 supports conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The flood protection review included all systems and components whose failure could prevent safe shutdown of the plant and maintenance thereof or result in significant uncontrolled release of radioactivity. Based on the review of the applicant's proposed design criteria, design bases, and safety classification for safety-related SSCs necessary for a safe plant shutdown during and following the flood condition from either external or internal causes, the staff concludes that the design of the facility for flood protection conforms to the Commission's regulations as set forth in General Design Criterion 2 and 10 CFR Part 100, Appendix A. This conclusion is based on the applicant having met the requirements of General Design Criterion 2 and Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 100 with respect to protection of SSCs important to safety from the effects of floods, tsunamis, and seiches by: (a) Meeting Regulatory Guide 1.59, positions C.1 regarding the conditions utilized for design of SSCs important to safety for the worst site-related flood probable at a nuclear power plant (e.g., PMF, seismically induced flood, hurricane, seiche, surge, PMP) and C.2 regarding alternatives to hardened protection of SSCs important to safety. (b) Meeting Regulatory Guide 1.102, positions C.1 regarding the