Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 94d86f6a-6c87-46a2-93df-ed4b0721bbdd
Document Type: srp
Title: is complete.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070646.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ulatory Guide 1.70, "Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants." 111. ANSI/ANS 3.2 1982, "Standard for Administrative Controls for Nuclear Power Plants," American National Standards Institute.81 12. NUREG-1358, Lessons Learned From the Special Inspection Program for Emergency Operating Procedures, 1989. 13. Supplement 1 to NUREG-1358, Lessons Learned From the Special Inspection Program for Emergency Operating Procedures, 1992.82 DRAFT Rev. 0 - April 1996 13.5.2.1-12 Appendix A to SRP Section 13.5.2.183 REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE EVALUATION OF PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGES Review Responsibilities Primary - Procedures and Systems Review Branch (PSRB) Secondary - None84 1.0 Background In August of 1982, NUREG-0899, "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures" was published. This document is designed to "identify the elements necessary for licensees and applicants to prepare and implement Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) that will provide the operator with directions to mitigate the consequences of a broad range of accidents and multiple equipment failures." In addition to identifying these elements, the document also outlines the process by which licensees and applicants should develop, implement, and maintain EOPs. To ensure that the elements are addressed in the new or upgraded procedures and that acceptable processes of development, implementation and maintenance are used, the staff identified a method of review that is intended to provide confidence that EOPs written or upgraded according to a given plant's program would be acceptable. The NRC staff believes that it is more important that they ensure that the process used to generate procedures and their technical basis is sound and well documented, than to perform a one-time review of EOPs, with no assurance that future EOP revisions are technically adequate and consistent with existing EOPs. With this approach, responsibility for the generation and