Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: edf4b0e7-a6b1-4168-a057-45a70ca5524d
Document Type: srp
Title: ADEQUACY OF DESIGN FEATURES AND FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1227/ML12276A112.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
or review of a standard design certification, standard design approval, or manufacturing license application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design set forth in the FSAR meets the acceptance criteria. Standard design certifications have referred to the FSAR as the design control document. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a standard design certification, standard design approval, manufacturing license, or other NRC approvals (e.g., a topical report). For review of standard design certification, manufacturing license, or COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies and concludes that the preliminary safety analysis report or final safety analysis report, as applicable, has provided sufficient information and that the review supports conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s Safety Evaluation Report (SER). The reviewer also states the basis for those conclusions. Reviewers shall confirm that the evaluation supports the following conclusions, to be included in the staff’s SER. • The applicant has adequately described the design features and functional capabilities identified for inclusion in the design and how they show that the facility can withstand the effects of a large commercial aircraft impact, namely that: 19.5-10 Revision 0 – April 2013 (i) the reactor core remains cooled or the containment remains intact; and (ii) spent fuel pool cooling or spent fuel pool integrity is maintained. • The applicant has