Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 0f097ac2-b7b1-437d-a055-1546a9094ef6
Document Type: srp
Title: CONCRETE CONTAINMENT
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1006/ML100620888.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
t 50) or RG 1.206 for a DC or a COL (for application submitted in accordance with 10 CFR Part 52). 2. Applicable Codes, Standards, and Specifications. The reviewer checks the list of codes, standards, guides, and specifications against the list in Subsection II.2 of this SRP section. The reviewer verifies that the applicant has used the appropriate code, standard, or guide and the applicable edition and stated effective addenda. 3. Loads and Loading Combinations. The reviewer verifies that the loads and load combinations, as described by the applicant, are consistent with those referenced in Subsection II.3 of this SRP section. The reviewer treats loading conditions that are unique to the site, such as potential aircraft crashes, and that are not specifically covered in Subsection II.3, on a case-by-case basis. Any deviations from the acceptance criteria for loads and load combinations should be adequately justified are identified. 4. Design and Analysis Procedures. The reviewer verifies that the applicant has committed to use the design and analysis procedures delineated in Article CC-3000 of the ASME Code and RG 1.136 (see Subsection II.3 of this SRP section). The reviewer evaluates any exceptions to these procedures on a case-by-case basis. The areas of review are evaluated for conformance with acceptance criteria contained in Subsection II.4 of this SRP section. 5. Structural Acceptance Criteria. The reviewer examines the limits on allowable stresses and strains in the concrete, reinforcement, the liner plate, and its anchors and in components of the prestressing system, if any, and compares them with the acceptable limits referenced in Subsection II.5 of this SRP section. If the applicant proposes to exceed some of these limits for some of the load combinations and at some localized points on the structure, the reviewer evaluates the justification provided to show that the structural integrity of the containment will not be affected. 6. Materials, Quality