Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 38c9e70d-6fc5-48a9-8504-06ce4c699bb8
Document Type: srp
Title: INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CLASS 2 AND 3 COMPONENTS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070450.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
r Class 1 components. 55. Editorial. Added "Article" designation, as defined in the ASME Code in "Organization of Section XI." 56. Editorial, Reference Verification Added the title of the Article, for consistency with other citations. 57. Editorial, Reference Verification Added the title of the Article, for consistency with other citations. 58. Editorial, Reference Verification Added "Subsubarticle" designation as defined in the ASME Code in "Organization of Section XI," added citation of IWD-1220 covering exemptions for Class 3 items, and added title, for consistency with other portions of this SRP section. 59. SRP-UDP Format Item, Develop Added Technical Rationale for Acceptance Criteria. Technical Rationale. Technical Rationale is a new feature added to the SRP. 60. Editorial Revised to reflect that multiple procedures are used and to reflect that there are now more procedures than areas of review. SRP Draft Section 6.6 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 6.6-18 61. Editorial Class 2 and Class 3 components are reviewed, thus removed allusion limited to Class 2 components. 62. Editorial Revised to reflect a procedure verifying acceptable inclusion of required components in the ISI program rather than a verification of acceptable component classification. 63. Editorial, Update to use PRB acronyms Revised to accurately characterize the review of component classification performed by EMEB under SRP Section 3.2.2. The acceptance criteria and review methods for determining the acceptability of component classifications for all pressure-retaining components is covered under SRP Section 3.2.2. Generally, there should be no discrepancies between SRP Section 3.2.2 component classifications and classifications evaluated in this SRP section (i.e. there should be one classification that is acceptable for each component), therefore discussion of discrepancies was deleted. 64. Editorial Deleted unnecessary and