Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: faf774de-7226-41f8-ba11-7cf612907af6
Document Type: srp
Title: GASEOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1306/ML13065A119.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
to comply with the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives. Accordingly, the reviewer should ensure that physical attributes (relevant to the review conducted under this SRP section) of the site that could affect the design basis of SSCs that are important to safety or risk significant are reflected in the site characteristics, design parameters, and conditions stipulated in the ESP, including COL action items. The staff should confirm that exposure pathways are based on site-specific or regional land-use information and include all appropriate dose receptors and populations near the proposed new unit(s) for all expected activities. Exposure pathways should include external exposures to airborne plumes, external exposure to contaminated ground, inhalation of airborne activity, and ingestion of agricultural products, and consumption of meat and milk products from grazing livestock. The staff’s conclusion of acceptability is based on site-specific data and assumptions presented by the applicant as to the types of exposure pathways and locations of dose receptors. However, should future local land-use information reveal that new and different exposure pathways and dose receptors exist from that described in the ESP, ESP applicants should identify this possibility and flag it as a COL action item in a COL application. The COL action item should flag the necessity to consider new exposure pathways, when different than those described in the ESP, and conduct a new dose assessment and confirm that associated doses are in compliance with NRC regulations and applicable guidance. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the staff’s safety review and analysis, conducted in accordance with the staff’s review approach described in the SRP Introduction, support conclusions of the following types to be included in the staff's SER. The reviewer also states