Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 496b5bd8-c9a2-4cf6-a703-e41c51e155ec
Document Type: srp
Title: CHANNEL MIGRATION OR DIVERSION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1819/ML18190A201.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.4.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
eristics that could be relevant to the design basis. In the absence of certain circumstances, such as a compliance or adequate protection issue, 10 CFR 52.39 precludes the staff from imposing new site characteristics, design parameters, or terms and conditions on the early site permit at the COL stage. Consequently, a COL application referencing an ESP need not include a re- investigation of the site characteristics that have previously been accepted in the referenced ESP. However, in accordance with 10 CFR 52.6, “Completeness and Accuracy of Information,” the applicant or licensee is responsible for identifying changes of which it is aware, that would satisfy the criteria specified in 10 CFR 52.39. Information provided by the applicant in accordance with 10 CFR 52.6(b) will be addressed by the staff during the review of a COL application referencing an ESP or a DC. For a COL application referencing either an ESP or DC or both, the staff should review the corresponding sections of the ESP and DC Final Safety Evaluation Report (FSER) to ensure that any early site permit conditions, restrictions to the DC, or COL action items identified in the FSERs are appropriately handled in the COL application. 2.4.9-15 Draft Revision 4 – September 2018 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The review should document the staff’s evaluation of the site characteristic flood against the relevant regulations and associated acceptance criteria. The evaluation should support the staff’s conclusions as to whether the applicable regulations have been met. The staff should summarize information provided by the applicant in its safety analysis report and then summarize the staff’s technical evaluation of that information in its SER. The staff’s evaluation may include verification that the applicant followed applicable regulatory guidance, performed independent calculations, and/or validated appropriate assumptions. While the reviewer may summarize or quote the information offered by the