Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: bc3e4db6-5bf3-4ccc-95dd-955e48799612
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070620007.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ey should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that the containment leakage rate testing program is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 52, 53, and 54; Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50; and 10 CFR Part 100. This conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should discuss each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the requirements of (cite regulation) with respect to (state limits of review in relation to regulation) by (for each item that is applicable to the review, state how it was met and why it is acceptable with respect to the regulation being discussed): A. Meeting the regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide(s); B. Providing and meeting an alternative method to regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide, that the staff has reviewed and found to be acceptable; C. Meeting the regulatory position in BTP ___; D. Using calculational methods for (state what evaluated) that have been previously reviewed by the staff and found acceptable; the staff has reviewed the impact parameters in this case and found them to be suitably conservative or performed independent calculations to verify acceptability of their analysis; and/or 6.2.6-11 Revision 3 -