Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 1825ea7e-5534-40ae-b67e-7045ba52fd82
Document Type: srp
Title: -18
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1305/ML13059A367.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
Draft Revision 2 – April 2014 transmission lines, can be designed to perform intended functions during and after anticipated seismic conditions iv. structures housing security personnel and storing equipment, vehicles, and supplies for security response and command and control functions can be designed and constructed to structurally withstand anticipated seismic conditions to ensure availability of personnel, systems, equipment, vehicles, and supplies to perform intended security functions v. plant and security contingency procedures can be established for maintaining and recovering required security postures for anticipated seismic conditions. Technical Rationale The technical rationale for application of these acceptance criteria to the areas of review addressed by this SRP section is discussed in the following sections and paragraphs: 1. In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 52.17(a)(1)(x), Subpart A, or 10 CFR Part 52, require ESP applicants to provide Information demonstrating that site characteristics are such that adequate security plans and measures can be developed. Also, the regulatory basis for the staff’s review is established by the requirements of 10 CFR 52.18, “Standards for Review of Applications,” which state that “applications (early site permit) filed under this subpart (A) will be reviewed according to the applicable standards set out in 10 CFR Part 50 and its appendices and 10 CFR Part 100.” The requirement of 10 CFR 100.21(f) also establishes that site characteristics must such that adequate security plans and measures can be developed. 2. The referenced sections of 10 CFR Part 52 (or 10 CFR Part 50) and the guidance provided in RS-002 specify the scope, content, and format of the material in an ESP application and the staff’s technical review, respectively. Under 10 CFR Part 52, Subpart A, the ESP review is limited to the information demonstrating that site characteristics are adequate to ensure that security plans and