Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 5019fa2b-7710-4c15-814b-3c97de8c0a60
Document Type: srp
Title: FITNESS FOR DUTY − OPERATIONAL PROGRAM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1132/ML113250541.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.7.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
equacy of the applicant’s program, and whether the program is acceptable for the purposes of the submittal. For example: “In accordance with 10 CFR Part 52, Subpart C, ‘Combined Licenses,’ ABC Corporation submitted the description of the operational FFD program for The Newest Power Plant, Units 7 and 8, to the NRC on [date], as part of its COL application. The staff has reviewed the applicant’s description of its operational FFD program and has determined that the program is acceptable and meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part 26 and 10 CFR 52.79(a)(44).” The staff will review the applicant’s description of its proposed FFD program to verify that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part 26. The reviewer(s) should make determinations as to whether the program is acceptable based on the criteria described in this SRP. Unresolved matters should be discussed with the FFD Program Manager and affected offices (e.g., Office of New Reactors [NRO]), as appropriate, before conducting a call or writing a letter to the applicant requesting additional information. The staff reviewer should note that different 10 CFR parts, most notably 10 CFR Parts 26 and 73, refer to the FFD program requirements associated with BOP and access authorization requirements. With several requirements in different parts, portions of a submitted program will not necessarily be formatted to follow the 10 CFR Part 26 regulations. The reviewer should cross-reference key components from the rule with specific sections of the applicant’s program, documenting sections of compliance and noncompliance, as a basis for accepting, questioning, 13.7.1-16 Draft Revision 0 – June 2013 or denying the acceptability of the applicant’s proposed FFD program. A formal request for additional information may be necessary to complete the acceptance review. The staff’s findings should be documented in a safety evaluation, protected as required under 10 CFR 73.21, and entered into the NRC’s ADAMS