Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dd4f84a9-8976-44c4-b631-d7c0254f4efc
Document Type: srp
Title: PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND SEVERE ACCIDENT EVALUATION FOR
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1416/ML14161A594.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ical adequacy of a PRA performed in support of an application for a design certification. 17. A footnote was added to describe Min-Max method which used to determine the HCLPF capacity. 18. Additional acceptance criteria for the staff’s review of an applicant’s assessment of risk from accidents that could affect multiple modules in facilities with small modular integral pressurized water reactors (iPWRs) were added. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES 1. A statement was added emphasizing the need for reviewers to assure that when RAIs lead to a substantive change to information in the FSAR or DCD, these documents are revised to reflect the new information. 2. A statement was added to notify readers that the NRC had issued the FSER for the DC of the ESBWR and to identify this FSER as a resource for reviewers to use in their review of Chapter 19 of DC and COL applications. 19.0-46 Draft Revision 3 –November 2014 3. A statement was added directing reviewers to follow the approach for risk-informing staff review activities provided in the introduction to NUREG-0800 when performing reviews of small, modular iPWRs. 4. Procedures were added to ensure that reviewers consider specific areas of the PRA in their reviews. 5. Procedures were added regarding review of results and descriptions of the assessment of internal fires in the PRA. 6. Procedures were added for reviewing technical adequacy of Level 1 PRA. 7. Procedures were added for reviewing specific issues associated with passive designs. 8. Procedures were added for review of topics specific to iPWRs. 9. Procedures were added for reviewing PRA for Non-Power Modes of Operation. 10. Procedures were added for review of Level 2 PRA issues. 11. Procedures were added for reviewing PRA-based SMA. 12. Procedures were added for review of results and descriptions of the assessment of high winds in the PRA. 13. Procedures were added for use during audits of the PRA in the applicant’s office. 14. Procedures were added for reviewing