Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 1c6bd8a3-6af8-4003-a672-742a629e42ee
Document Type: srp
Title: ASSURING THAT OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURES ARE AS LOW AS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1315/ML13151A061.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
rganizational structure as related to the radiation protection manager will be communicated to the staff reviewers who have the primary review responsibility for this item under SRP Chapter 13. 2. The reviewer will evaluate information in this section in accordance with RG 8.8, Section C.1.b (3), to determine whether the organizational structure provides a mechanism for the radiation protection manager and the radiation protection organization to interact with design review groups in such a manner that the design of the plant will incorporate methods and techniques for reducing ORE. If the future plant radiation protection manager has not yet been selected, design review should be accomplished in accordance with the guidance of RG 8.8, unless acceptable alternatives are proposed. The reviewer will determine that appropriate personnel with operating plant experience have evaluated the proposed plant design. The reviewer will determine from information furnished whether the applicant has incorporated previously accepted design features and has used operating experience to improve the design of the plant with regard to ensuring that ORE will be ALARA. The reviewer will also evaluate the material in this section against the requirements of 10 CFR 19.12 and 10 CFR 20.1101(b) and the guidelines of RG 8.10. 3. Based on this review, the staff may request additional information or ask the applicant to modify its submission in order to meet the acceptance criteria given in Subsection II of this SRP section. 4. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the FSAR meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure