Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a09b1666-b289-4ea9-9e8f-3ee5fbd5bf41
Document Type: srp
Title: CONCRETE AND STEEL INTERNAL STRUCTURES OF STEEL OR
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1319/ML13198A250.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ion III, Division 2, Subsection CC, with additional guidance provided by RGs 1.57 and 1.136, respectively. The use of these criteria, as defined by the applicable codes, standards, and specifications; loads and loading combinations; design and analysis procedures; structural acceptance criteria; materials, quality control programs, and special construction techniques; and testing and inservice surveillance requirements, provides reasonable assurance that, in the event of earthquakes and various postulated accidents occurring within the containment, the containment internal structures will withstand the specified design conditions without impairment of structural integrity or the performance of required safety functions. 3.8.3-36 Revision 4 – September 2013 For DC and COL reviews, the findings will also summarize the staff’s evaluation of requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters) and COL action items relevant to this SRP section. In addition, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other SER sections, the findings will summarize the staff's evaluation of the ITAAC, including design acceptance criteria, as applicable. V. IMPLEMENTATION The staff will use this SRP section in performing safety evaluations of DC applications and license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or 10 CFR Part 52. The staff will use the method described herein to evaluate conformance with the Commission's regulations. The application must contain an evaluation of the standard plant design against the SRP revision in effect 6 months before the docket date of the application. The application must identify and describe all differences between this SRP section and the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for the facility, and discuss how the proposed alternative provides an acceptable method of complying with the regulations that underlie the SRP acceptance criteria. VI. REFERENCES