Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 4cc5538b-3bd0-4a24-9582-d8fc4ea77f2b
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY – EARLY SITE PERMIT
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1025/ML102571602.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
both internal and external threats. Compliance with 10 CFR 73.55 provides high assurance that the plant is protected against the theft of nuclear material or radiological sabotage. 3. 10 CFR 100.21(f) establishes that site characteristics must be such that adequate security plans and measures can be developed. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Section II. 1. The reviewer should ensure that the applicant has provided clear, approximate-to-scale diagrams, figures, and drawings that provide a clear visual depiction of the proposed facility and site physical layout, including, but not limited to, the following: pedestrian land approaches, vehicular land approaches, railroad approaches, water approaches, potential “high-ground” adversary advantage areas, and any existing and planned culverts or unattended openings. The submission should include a clear visual depiction of VAs and vital equipment; the intake structure; OCA and PA checkpoints and the PA boundary for 13.6.3-6 Revision 1 – October 2010 powerblock and safety-related intake structures; and nearby roads, transportation routes, pipelines, and hazardous facilities. 2. Consistent with the SRP acceptance criteria identified above, the reviewer should ensure that the applicant has described the site’s characteristics as they currently exist. The applicant should confirm that the site-specific analysis considered each aspect of the acceptance criteria and that the site is of sufficient size to provide adequate space and distance for the construction and installation of: (1) physical barriers, isolation zones,