Document: NRC Regulatory Guide
Document ID: 5810150e-ee20-4cd1-b72f-6e918a603f73
Document Type: regulatory_guide
Title: Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (Rev. 1)
Source: NRC Regulatory Guide Division 1
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1523/ML15233A056.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 
Section ID: RG-1.206
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
TAAC, the additional information related to ITAAC in Section 14.3 of Tier 2 should be presented along with the ITAAC itself. The additional information provided may include, but is not limited to, the following: a. a reference to the FSAR discussion of the top-level design feature or performance characteristic to be verified by the ITAAC; b. a discussion of the verification method; c. a clarifying discussion of the ITAAC acceptance criteria; d. a reference to or discussion of associated NRC regulatory guidance, industry codes, or industry standards; and e. a reference to the FSAR Section 14.2 test abstract that describes the preoperational test that will satisfy the ITAAC (if the ITAAC is a preoperational test). Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria Format and Content The applicant should format the ITAAC in a three-column table, as shown below. ITAAC TABLE X.X.X-X DESIGN COMMITMENT INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Xxxxxxxxxx Yyyyyyyyyy Zzzzzzzzzzz The first column of the ITAAC table should identify the proposed design commitment (i.e., requirement) to be verified. This column should contain the specific text of the design information extracted from the detailed design descriptions in the COL FSAR. Applicants should minimize any differences in the text unless their intent, for example, is to better conform the commitments in the design description to the ITAAC format. Any differences in text, however, should retain the principal performance characteristics and safety functions of the design feature that should be verified. DG-1325, Page-75 The second column of the ITAAC table should identify the proposed method (inspection, testing, or analysis or some combination of the three) by which the applicant will verify the design commitment described in column 1. In situ testing of the as-built SSCs is the preferred method of ITAAC verification. The detailed design information in the COL FSAR should include supporting information for each