Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: faf774de-7226-41f8-ba11-7cf612907af6
Document Type: srp
Title: GASEOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1306/ML13065A119.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
iduals in unrestricted areas in excess of 0.01 cGy (10 millirads) for gamma radiation or 0.02 cGy (20 millirads) for beta radiation under 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Section II.B. RG 1.109, 1.111, and 1.112 provide acceptable methods for performing this analysis using the GASPAR II computer code (NUREG/CR-4653). C. The calculated annual total quantity of radioiodines, carbon-14, tritium, and all radioactive materials in particulate form released from each reactor at the site in effluents to the atmosphere will not result in an estimated annual dose or dose commitment from such releases for any individual in an unrestricted area from all pathways of exposure in excess of 0.15 mSv (15 mrem) to any organ under 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Section II.C. RG 1.109, 1.111, and 1.112 provide acceptable methods for performing this analysis using the GASPAR II computer code (NUREG/CR-4653). D. The concentrations of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents released to an unrestricted area will not exceed the limits specified in Table 2, Column 1, and Note 4 of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20. 11.3-12 Draft Revision 4 – August 2014 E. In addition to 1.A, 1.B, 1.C, and 1.D, above, the GWMS should include all items of reasonably demonstrated technology that, when added to the system sequentially and in order of diminishing cost-benefit return, for a favorable cost- benefit ratio, can effect reductions in dose to the population reasonably expected to be within 80 km (50 mile) of the reactor and comply with the cost-benefit ratio of Section II.D of Appendix I. RG 1.110 provides an acceptable method for performing this analysis. 2. The GWMS should be designed with adequate capacity to process gaseous wastes during periods when major processing equipment may be down for maintenance (single failures) and during periods of excessive waste generation. Systems that have adequate capacity to process the anticipated wastes and that are capable of operating within the design objectives