Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: debd6dd8-8e9e-4ee8-8a7d-6c4893b13ee1
Document Type: srp
Title: -10
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0600/ML060030233.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
provided to assist the reviewer in using the criteria presented in Subsections 3 through 6 of this appendix. 2.1 Reviewers should be aware that different degrees of objectivity or subjectivity may be required in reviewing each of the four parts of the PGP since the parts may differ in detail and approach. 2.2 Reviewers should become very familiar with the general objectives of each section of a PGP. The specific review guidelines can serve as the basis for making the subjective evaluations of the general objectives. 2.3 When an objective is not met or a specific response cannot be judged acceptable because of missing information, the reviewer should identify the information that is missing and what is needed to make the PGP acceptable.- 2.4 Some items included in a PGP may not be addressed within either the general objectives or the specific review guidelines. These items must be evaluated carefully to ensure that unnecessary or possibly detrimental inclusions do not occur in the EOPs (e.g., an EOP Deficiencies section is not a desirable inclusion in an EOP). 2.5 As stated in the Background section, most of the review guidelines are subjective. The reviewer will have to judge whether the discussion of an item is sufficiently clear, complete, and technically acceptable to achieve the objectives. 13.5.2.1-1 1 Rev. 1 - November 2005 2.6 In some cases the names, titles, etc., used in the PGPs may be different from those used in this document, although the same topics are being discussed. For example, the format of "decision aids" may be covered under a PGP section with the heading 'Job Performance Aids." Reviewers should be careful that identified PGP deficiencies are not based on semantics. 2.7 In some cases a particular subject may appear not to be addressed in the PGP, when in fact it is addressed in another part of the PGP. For example, the determination of the - adequacy of control room instrumentation and controls may be addressed not in the P-STGs but in the