Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e419c547-311b-4172-83fd-9dea7cfe5e9e
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATIONAL REVIEW
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070623.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
tion 13.4 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence 13.4-9 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 Item numbers in the following table correspond to superscript numbers in the redline/strikeout copy of the draft SRP section. Item Source Description 1. Current PRB name and Changed PRB Quality Assurance and abbreviation Maintenance Branch (HQMB). 2. Current PRB designation Changed PRB to HQMB. 3. SRP-UDP format item This review applies only at the OL or COL stage of review. No review is done for standard plant design certifications or at the time of construction permit applications. 4. Editorial revision This is the first of several changes in this paragraph to clarify that the intent of the applicants reviews and audits reviewed under this SRP section is to achieve administrative control over activities important to safety rather than to achieve quality assurance. 5. Editorial revision This phrase is removed as unnecessary. Wording was added to make explicit that the review is done at the OL stage. 6. Editorial revision Excess verbiage was removed to simplify the sentence. 7. Integrated Impact Number Review of the post-trip reviews was 944 added because of the safety importance of this activity per GL 83-28. 8. Editorial revision Wording changed slightly to balance clauses in sentence. 9. SRP-UDP format item Wording added to show that this review does not apply to CP or design certification applicants. 10. Editorial revision RG 1.70 tells what the FSAR should include. This sentence was revised to emphasize what areas are addressed in the SRP section. SRP Draft Section 13.4 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 13.4-10 11. Editorial revision "Plant staff" is used to reduce confusion. Too many different phrases are used to identify the specific review responsibility. The Current SRP section talks about "plant operations review," "onsite organization" review, "plant staff review," "plant staff