Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 3d0785e0-b95c-4d8c-b957-005cf3cd61c6
Document Type: esrp
Title: TRANSMISSION CORRIDORS AND OFFSITE AREAS
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.1.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
rse Impacts: (a) Consider mitigation measures for adverse impacts. Matters to be reviewed include revegetation, landscaping, cleanup and disposal of debris, erosion control, land-management practices, and use of chemicals. (b) Consider staff practices for applications to withdraw or terminate a license or license application after site work has been conducted. It has been staff practice to follow the site redress procedures and practices used in the withdrawal applications for CP extension and for OLs submitted by Consumers Power Co. to NRC for its Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1986). These procedures include (1) preparation of and compliance with a site stabilization plan by the applicant, (2) an inspection and evaluation report prepared by NRC after the applicant’s completion of site stabilization activities, and (3) preparation of an environmental assessment by NRC based on the inspection report. (3) Analyzing the Construction Impacts on the Geologic Environment: (a) Consult with the safety evaluation reviewers for geology for an analysis of the potential impacts of corridor and offsite area construction on the geologic environment. NUREG-1555 4.1.2-8 October 1999 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS Evaluation of each identified impact should result in one of the following three possible determinations: • The impact is minor, and mitigation is not required. When all impacts are of this nature, the reviewer should include a statement in the environmental impact statement of the following type: The staff reviewed the available information on the land-use impacts on transmission corridors and offsite areas from construction and refurbishment activities. Based on this review, the staff concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts. • The impact is adverse, but can be mitigated by specific design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has identified and determined to be practical. For these cases, the reviewer should