Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c1650863-1de1-414d-af2a-3303c5a3d208
Document Type: srp
Title: FUNCTIONAL DESIGN, QUALIFICATION, AND INSERVICE TESTING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0707/ML070720041.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
20-month interval must comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of the OM Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a on the date 12 months before the date of issuance of the operating license under 10 CFR Part 50, or 12 months before the date of the Commission finding that the acceptance criteria have been met pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52 for a COL. 3.9.6-20 Revision 3 - March 2007 c. IST programs implemented during the successive 120-month intervals must comply with the requirements of the latest edition and addenda of the OM Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a 12 months before the start of the 120-month interval. 13. 10 CFR 52.47(a)(21) requires that applications for DCs contain proposed technical resolutions of the unresolved safety issues and medium- and high-priority generic safety issues identified in the version of NUREG-0933 current on the date 6 months before application identifies as technically relevant to the design. 14. 10 CFR 52.47(b)(1) and 10 CFR 52.80(a) requires that an applicant for a DC and COL, respectively, identify the inspections, tests, and analyses that the licensee shall perform under 10 CFR Part 52, and the acceptance criteria that, if met, are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the facility has been constructed and will be operated in conformity with the license, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the Commission’s rules and regulations. 15. A license condition for operational program implementation milestones that the FSAR fully describes or references will ensure that such programs, or portions thereof, are implemented before they are needed.. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how