Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b91646e8-0b07-4d85-a5e4-783b27cdcd88
Document Type: srp
Title: SEISMIC AND DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070286.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.10
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
icantsapplicant's program is complete in this area so 73 that the staff may be assured that the proper system parameters are specified and appropriate loads defined. The review will screen several key components in the systems to establish the program objectives. e. The test procedures are reviewed against the criteria set forth in subsections II.1 or II.2. In evaluating an applicant's program for pumps and valves, the reviewer also utilizes, for guidance purposes, the information contained in the following documents, although these draft documents have not been endorsed by the NRC: (1) ANSI B.16.41, "Functional Qualification Requirements for Power Operated Active Valve Assemblies for Nuclear Power Plants" (draft);74 (2) ANSI N41.6, "Functional Qualification Requirements for Actuators for Power Operated Valve Assemblies for Nuclear Power Plants" (draft);75 (3) ANSI/ASME N551.2, "Standard for Qualification of ASME Code Class 2 & 3 Pumps for Safety Systems Service" (draft); and76 (4) ANSI N45 N551.4, "Functional Qualification of Motor Drives for Safety Related Code Class 2 and 3 Pumps for Nuclear Power Plants" (draft).77 In addition to the above documents, references 23 and 2422 and 23 are utilized 78 by the reviewer to evaluate the operability assurance programs for purge and vent valves and deep draft pumps. f. The analytical procedures which are used in conjunction with testing or by itself to demonstrate operability are reviewed by comparing the information submitted DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 3.10-18 in the applicants program with the acceptance criteria delineated in subsections II.1 or II.2. For pumps and valves, the references cited in subsection III.2.e provide additional criteria for demonstrating operability by analysis and are utilized by the reviewer to supplement the staff's review procedures. 3. Reviews of COL applications should include audits of the equipment qualification file. Results of tests and analyses should be reviewed to accomplish the