Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 63e0a936-4110-4a3f-94c4-d81f3a54165f
Document Type: srp
Title: TRAINING FOR NON-LICENSED PLANT STAFF
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070636.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.2.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
nation of the information submitted to determine that all subject matter identified in subsection I.1 above has been addressed, that the information submitted 91 supports the reviews and verifications described therein, and 92 2. A detailed comparison of the information with the acceptance criteria of subsection II above. The reviewer should ensure that, whenever the applicant has committed to follow the position of a regulatory guide, industry standard or other reference document, the specific revision being referred to is identified. Similarly, whenever the reviewer is using a position in a reference document as a basis for acceptability, the revision being used should be identified. 13.2.2-17 DRAFT Rev. 1 - April 1996 The reviewer should also ensure that the applicant has committed to a reasonable schedule for the training programs that relates to the fuel loading date. The reviewer may consult with CMEBSPLB in the area of fire protection training and with OLB in the area of training for 93 mitigating core damage.94 The reviewer then determines, based upon the foregoing, the overall acceptability of the applicant's plant staff training plans. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.95 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer should verify that the information presented and his that the review support an 96 evaluation findings statement of the following type, to be used in the staff's safety evaluation