Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 73dc4705-6dff-4f44-87ee-2a6f76cc6536
Document Type: srp
Title: OTHER SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1319/ML13198A258.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
se acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. In accordance with 10 CFR 52.47(a)(8), (21), (22), and 10 CFR 52.79(a)(17), and (20), for new reactor license applications submitted under 10 CFR Part 52, the applicant is required to (1) address the proposed technical resolution of unresolved safety issues and medium- and high- priority generic safety issues which are identified in the version of NUREG-0933 current on the date up to 6 months before the docket date of the application and which are technically relevant to the design; (2) demonstrate how the operating experience insights have been incorporated into the plant design; and, (3) provide information necessary to demonstrate compliance with any technically relevant portions of the Three Mile Island requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.34(f), except paragraphs (f)(1)(xii), (f)(2)(ix), and (f)(3)(v). These cross-cutting review areas should be addressed by the reviewer for each technical subsection and relevant conclusions documented in the corresponding Safety Evaluation Report (SER) section. 1. Description of the Structures. After the type of structure and its functional characteristics are identified, the staff obtains information on similar other seismic Category I structures previously licensed for reference. Such information, which is available in SARs and amendments of previous license applications, enables identification of differences for the case under review. These differences require additional scrutiny and evaluation. New and unique features that have not been used in the past are of particular interest and are thus examined in greater detail. The reviewer evaluates the information furnished in the SAR for completeness in accordance with RG 1.70 for a CP or an OL (for applications submitted in accordance 3.8.4-17 Revision 4 –