Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 211c543c-4c25-4853-8d62-6f8902be0c8e
Document Type: srp
Title: EMERGENCY PLANNING - INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0707/ML070730206.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.10
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Primary - Organization responsible for the review of Emergency Planning Secondary - None I. AREAS OF REVIEW This standard review plan (SRP) section addresses the applicant’s emergency planning, as described in the safety analysis report (SAR). The areas of review will depend on the specific application. For an application submitted under 10 CFR Part 50, this primary review responsibility involves evaluation of evidence of preliminary planning (in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, PSAR) or substantive evidence of planning (in the Final Safety Analysis Report, FSAR) for emergency preparedness directed at situations involving real or potential radiological hazards. For an application submitted under 10 CFR Part 52, the review involves evaluation of various aspects of emergency planning, which will depend on whether the application is for an early site permit (ESP), design certification, or combined license (COL). This SRP section specifically addresses inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) related to emergency planning (i.e., EP-ITAAC). EP-ITAAC information is included in an ESP application with complete and integrated emergency plans, a combined license (COL) application or Tier 1 information in a design certification (DC) application. 14.3.10-2 March 2007 The review covers plans for emergency response activities which may address such areas as, emergency planning zones (EPZs), emergency action levels (EALs), evacuation time estimates (ETEs), and emergency response facilities. The reviewer will evaluate proposed inspections, tests, and analyses applicable to emergency planning that the licensee shall perform, and the associated acceptance criteria (i.e., EP-ITAAC). In general, EP- ITAAC are inappropriate for procedure-level details associated with the proposed emergency plans, in that procedure adequacy and implementation will be evaluated under the exercise ITAAC. EP-ITAAC, should be limited