Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 50c5f9b6-d85c-4012-a8e9-48eaaafff93e
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTROL ROOM AREA VENTILATION SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550045.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.4.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ent required to cope with the event or recovery therefrom are verified to be of sufficient capacity and capability for such support. 10 CFR 50.63 requirements provide assurance that necessary operator actions can be performed and that necessary control room-area equipment will be functional under the expected environmental conditions during and following a station blackout, thereby ensuring that the core will be cooled and appropriate containment integrity will be maintained. 9.4.1-8 Revision 3 - March 2007 III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. The procedures are used during the construction permit review to determine that the design criteria and bases and the preliminary design as set forth in the preliminary SAR meet the acceptance criteria of subsection II of this SRP section. For the review of operating license (OL) application, the procedures are used to verify that the initial design criteria and bases are implemented appropriately in the final design as set forth in the final SAR. These procedures should be followed for the review of a DC and a COL application. The procedures for standard DC reviews of designs for which new standard technical specifications are required and for OL or combined licenses include a determination that the proposed technical specifications agree with the requirements for system testing, minimum performance, and surveillance developed in the staff’s review. The primary reviewer coordinates this review with the other areas of review as stated in subsection I of this SRP section. The primary reviewer uses such input as