Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: f73f10ca-1bf0-4b75-93c6-fd154ac67b73
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE AND OTHER OPERATING  PROCEDURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070648.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
expertise of the reviewer, especially in the human factors area, and to promote consistency among the PGP reviews, Appendix A identifies the subjects which should be considered by the reviewer in the evaluation. However, Appendix A is not a "checklist" and each item of Appendix A need not be addressed in the PGP to be acceptable. Normally the PGP review should be conducted prior to the date the applicant plans to begin formal operator training on the EOPs. If this is not possible because of a delayed submittal, perform an acceptance review of the PGP. Specifically, audit the four parts of the PGP to determine if there are any major deficiencies in the EOP program that warrant postponing operator training. If major deficiencies are found, identify the additional information necessary to conduct the complete PGP review to the Licensing Project Manager so that the applicant can be notified prior to the initiation of training on the EOPs. Review the PGPs for operating license applicants to determine if the applicant's program meets the requirements of Generic Letter 82-33. The review consists of the evaluation of the four parts of the PGP: The P-STGs, the P-SWG, the description of the program for V&V of the EOPs, and the description of the training program for EOPs necessary to support the conclusions described in Section IV below. To support this review, Appendix A provides additional review guidance. Review the P-STGs to determine if acceptable analyses of accidents and transients and development of technical guidelines for operator actions applicable to the plant have been completed, and to determine if an acceptable process for identifying operator information and control needs has been described. Instead of being included in the PGP, this process may be described by the applicant in the documentation submitted for staff review in accordance with SRP 18.1, in support of the Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR). The reviewer should coordinate review of this