Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 3ea2f0ac-4d7e-464a-b1c4-390c3970f642
Document Type: srp
Title: provides specific thermal-hydraulic criteria.  The available radioactive fission product
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0707/ML070740002.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
rameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. 4.2-22 Revision 3 - March 2007 For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 2. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. 3. For construction permit (CP) applications, the review should ensure that the design bases set forth in the preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) meet the acceptance criteria given in Subsection II.A. In addition, the CP review should determine, from a study of the preliminary fuel system design, that there is reasonable assurance that the final fuel system design will meet the design bases. This judgment may be based on experience with similar designs. 4. For operating license (OL) applications, the review should confirm that the design bases set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meet the acceptance criteria given in Subsection II.A and that the final fuel system design meets the design bases. Much of the fuel system review is generic and is not repeated for each similar plant. That is, the reviewer will have evaluated the fuel design or certain aspects of the fuel design in previous PSARs, FSARs, and licensing topical reports. All previous reviews on which the current review depends should be referenced so that the plant safety evaluation report comprises a completely