Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 35d16973-484d-41cb-9b6c-d66cae8072ca
Document Type: srp
Title: EMERGENCY PLANNING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0634/ML063410307.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ction or information items, permit conditions, or ITAAC. For a referenced ESP, the reviewer should determine whether the application includes any new or additional information that updates or corrects the information that was provided under 10 CFR 52.17(b), and if so, whether the applicant discusses whether the new or additional information materially changes the bases for compliance with the applicable requirements, as required by 10 CFR 52.79(b)(4). If the proposed facility emergency plans incorporate existing emergency plans or major features of emergency plans, the reviewer should confirm that the application identifies changes to the emergency plans or major features of emergency plans that have been incorporated into the proposed facility emergency plans, and that constitute a decrease in effectiveness under 10 CFR 50.54(q). 10 CFR 52.79(b)(5) provides that if complete and integrated emergency plans are approved as part of the ESP, new certifications meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 52.79(a)(22) are not required. The reviewer should determine if the applicant has provided updates to the certifications to incorporate new and significant information, if required. 13.3-28 Revision 3 - March 2007 5. The reviewer should confirm that the application identifies the technically relevant portions of the requirements in 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1) through 10 CFR 50.34(f)(3), and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with them (see 10 CFR 50.34(f)). 6. The reviewer should identify the EAL scheme proposed in the application, and determine whether it is consistent with methods that have been found acceptable by the NRC staff for complying with NRC regulations; i.e., Appendix 1 to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, NUMARC/NESP-007, or NEI 99-01 (as endorsed by the applicable revision of RG 1.101). If the applicant proposes an EAL scheme that differs from those acceptable for the existing light water reactors, the reviewer should examine the technical basis for the