Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 57cec0a6-9a33-4d19-ae40-8f91786af983
Document Type: srp
Title: for reviewing the applicant's plans and provisions for security, including the
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350055.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
is as follows: I. Examnination the informnation submitted to determine that all items in subsection L "Areas of Review:' have been addressed. 2. Compare the information with the acceptance criteria of subsection IL "Acceptance Criteria". 3. Review the information provided by the NRC regional office on the organizational and administrative commitments in the applicant's SAR, as appropriate. 4. Verify the implementation of the management structure and the provision of technical support personnel by visiting the applicant's corporate headquarters and the site, as appropriate. Based on the foregoing, the reviewer then determines the overall acceptability of the applicant's operating organizations and plant staffing plans. For OL or late-stage COL transfers under 10 CFR 50.80, the operating organization was found acceptable as part of the initial licensing of the plant. Subsequent changes to the operating organization should have been made in accordance with an appropriate evaluation methodology. Therefore, the existing organization should still be acceptable. License transfer reviews should focus on the changes proposed to the operating organization as a result of the transfer. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3, to verify that the design described in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), 13.1.2-9 Rev. 4 - November 1999 site interface requirements, and COL action items, meets the acceptance criteria in subsection I, "Acceptance Criteria." SRP Section 14.3 contains procedures for reviewing certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and 1TAAC. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the information submitted supports conclusions of the following type to be used in the staffs safety evaluation report: For a