Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 243e1ce7-857c-48e4-9eb7-6125311da9be
Document Type: srp
Title: RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL (RHR) SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070437.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
em to determine that it will perform its design function as required and conform to all applicable acceptance criteria. The ICSB HICB61 also reviews the provisions taken to meet GDC 19 with respect to equipment outside of the control room for hot and cold shutdown. 9. The Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch (PERB) has primary review responsibility for SRP Section 12.1 62 through 12.5 including Task Action Plan items II.B.2 of NUREG-0737 and NUREG-0718 which involve a radiation and shielding design review and corrective actions taken to ensure adequate access to vital areas and protection of safety equipment (CPs and OLs). 63 10. The Technical Specifications Branch (TSB) reviews the Technical Specifications as part of their primary review responsibility for SRP Section 16.0.64 The review for Fire Protection, Technical Specifications, and Quality Assurance are coordinated and performed by the CMEB, Standardization and Special Projects Branch (SSPB) and Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) as part of their primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 9.5.1, 16.0 and 17.0, respectively.65 For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility ofunder other branchesSRP sections, the acceptance criteria necessary for the review and their methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP Ssections of the corresponding primary branch.66 5.4.7-7 DRAFT Rev. 4 - April 1996 II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The Reactor Systems Branch SRXB acceptance criteria are based on meeting the requirements 67 of the following regulations: A. General Design Criterion 2 with respect to the seismic design of systems, structures and components SSCs whose failure could cause an unacceptable reduction in the capability 68 of the residual heat removal system. Acceptability is based on meeting position C-2 of Regulatory Guide 1.29 or its equivalent. B. General Design Criterion 4, as related to