Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 04a9103e-5440-4eaf-8c73-5bd9e24186ef
Document Type: srp
Title: Reactor Coolant Pumps
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340645.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
The RSB reviews the process design parameters and flow coastdown and startup characteristics under various SRP Sections of Chapter 15. The ASB reviews the Ancillary Cooling Systems and the potential for pump and motor missiles under SRP Sections 9.2.2 and 3.5.1.2. The MEB reviews the structural integrity and the method of analysis, and the inservice testing of pumps under SRP Sect'ions 3.9.1 through 3.9.3 and 3.9.6. The EQB reviews the operability of pumps under SRP Section 3.10. The MTEB reviews the inservice inspection under SRP Section 5.2.4 and the materials of fabrication under SRP Section 5.2.3. 5;4.'2 Steam Generators (PWR) The RSB reviews the configuration and process design parameters and the response to various anticipated operational occurrences and postulated accidents under various SRP Sections of Chapter 15. The MEB reviews the structural adequacy and the methods of analysis of the steam generator under SRP Sections 3.9.1 through 3.9.3. Rev. 1 - July 1981 USNRC STANDARD REVIEW PLAN Standard review plans are prepared for the guidance of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants. These documents are made available to the public as part of the Commisson's policy to Inform the nuclear Industry and the general public of regulatory procedures and policies. Standard review plans are not substitutes for regulatory guides or the Commission's regulations end compliance with them Is not required. The standard review plan sections are keyed to the Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants. Not aii sections of the Standard Format have a corresponding review plan. Published standard review plans will be revised periodically, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new Informa tion and experience. Comments and suggestions for improvement will be considered and should be sent to the U.S. Npiclear Regulatory Commission.