Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dfad5166-86ba-4d57-a49c-4a918bb0780d
Document Type: srp
Title: and Section 2.4.9, as described in the corresponding SRP sections.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0701/ML070100647.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.4.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
lling flooding 3 References for PMP estimates, time distribution, etc., are in SRP Section 2.4.3. 2.4.2-15 Revision 4 - March 2007 mechanism set forth above are acceptable and meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 52.17(a)(1)(vi), 10 CFR Part 100.20(c), and 10 CFR Part 100.21(d). In view of the above, the staff finds the applicant’s proposed site characteristics related to the local intense precipitation, flooding causal mechanisms, and the controlling flooding mechanism for inclusion in an ESP for the applicant's site, should one be issued, to be acceptable. 3. Design Certification Reviews The following statement should be preceded by a list of the applicable site parameters used for the plant: The NRC staff acknowledges that the applicant has selected the site parameters referenced above for plant design inputs (a subset of which is included as Tier 1 information), and agrees that they are representative of a reasonable number of sites that have been or may be considered for a COL application. The local intense precipitation, flooding causal mechanisms, and the controlling flooding mechanism are site-specific and will be addressed by the COL applicant. This should include the provision of information sufficient to demonstrate that the design of the plant falls within the site parameters specified by the siting review. For DC and COL reviews, the findings will also summarize (to the extent that the review is not discussed in other SER sections) the staff's evaluation of the ITAAC, including design acceptance criteria, as applicable, and interface requirements and combined license action items relevant to this SRP section. V. IMPLEMENTATION The staff will use this SRP section in performing safety evaluations of DC applications and license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or 10 CFR Part 52. Except when the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the Commission’s regulations, the