Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e1c5261f-4ef6-4478-8cf0-015611057574
Document Type: srp
Title: and 9.3.2, “Process and Post-accident Sampling Systems.”  The review addresses
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15029A039.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
the FSAR and failure analysis are consistent with SRP acceptance criteria. The NRC will review the description of the design features of the GWMS provided in the FSAR, including SRP Sections 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 10.4, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, and 12.3-12.4, for completeness in accordance with RG 1.70, “Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition),” or 1.206. While the SRP references RG 1.70 and 1.206, not all sections of RG 1.70 have a corresponding review plan section. The SRP sections applicable to a COL application for a new light-water reactor (LWR), submitted under 10 CFR Part 52, are based on RG 1.206. 1. Programmatic requirements. Commission regulations and policy mandate “programs” applicable to SSCs that include: A. Technical specifications, Section 5 Administrative Controls, as they relate to administrative programs on radioactive effluent controls and monitoring via the ODCM, SREC, and radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP). The associated TS are discussed in NUREG-1430, NUREG-1431, NUREG-1432, NUREG-1433, and NUREG-1434. The review of the SREC, ODCM, and REMP may be conducted as part of the review of SRP Section 11.4 or 11.5, depending on where the applicant has located the procedural details and programmatic controls, consistent with the provisions of GL 89-01 and NUREG-1301 or NUREG-1302. B. Startup initial testing plan, as described in SRP Section 14.2, using RG 1.68 and 1.33. C. Implementation of these programs will be inspected in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC)-2504, “Construction Inspection Program – Non- ITAAC Inspections.” D. If applicable, the staff reviews the proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the GWMS design and resulting effects on the development of the radioactive gaseous effluent source terms. The staff’s evaluation and conclusion of the acceptability of the augmented programmatic elements is