Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 062bafc6-0bc5-4a2f-a566-7200c0c49d7a
Document Type: srp
Title: ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES SYSTEMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1515/ML15159B099.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
e these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 3. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report (SER). The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. The review of the instrumentation and control aspects of the ESF systems includes the ESFAS and the ESF control systems. The ESFAS detects a plant condition requiring the operation of an ESF system and/or auxiliary supporting features and other auxiliary features and initiates operation of the systems. The ESF control systems regulate the operation of the ESF systems following automatic initiation by the protection system or manual initiation by the plant operator. The NRC staff concludes that the design of the ESFAS is acceptable and meets the relevant requirements of General Design Criteria 1, 2, 4, 10, 13, 15, 16, 19-24, 29, 33, 34, 35, 38, 41, and 44, and 10 CFR 50.34(f), 10 CFR 50.54(jj) and 10 CFR 50.55(i), and 10 CFR 50.55a(h). The staff conducted a review of these systems for conformance to the guidelines in the RGs, industry standards and branch technical positions applicable to these systems. The staff concludes that the applicant/licensee acceptably identified the guidelines applicable to these systems. Based upon the review of the system design for conformance to the guidelines, the staff concludes that the systems