Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c0c5657a-82df-46c2-8cb5-fad0fd37fb58
Document Type: srp
Title: GASEOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS1
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070610.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ences and have concluded that the system capacity and design flexibility are adequate to meet the anticipated needs of the plant. 5. The staff has reviewed the applicant's quality assurance provisions for the GRS portion of the gaseous waste management systems, the quality group classifications used for systems the GRS components, the seismic design applied to the design of the systems GRS, and of structures housing the radwaste systems GRS. The design of the system GRS and structures housing these systems the GRS meet the criteria as set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.143.84 6. The staff has reviewed the provisions incorporated in the applicant's design to control releases due to hydrogen explosions in the gaseous waste management systems GRS and concluded that the measures proposed by the applicant are 85 adequate to prevent the occurrence of an explosion or to withstand the effects of an explosion in accordance with General Design Criterion 3 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. For design certification reviews, the findings will also summarize, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other safety evaluation report sections, the staff's evaluation of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), including design acceptance criteria (DAC), site interface requirements, and combined license action items that are relevant to this SRP section.86 V. IMPLEMENTATION The following is intended to provide guidance to applicants and licenses regarding the NRC staff's plans for using this SRP section. This SRP section will be used by the staff when performing safety evaluations of license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR 50 or 10 CFR 52. Except in those 87 cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with 11.3-15 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 specified portions of the Commission's regulations, the method described herein will be used by the staff in its evaluation of conformance with Commission