Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 3d313c6f-7766-49fb-8400-3b6dae97fe7d
Document Type: srp
Title: SPECIAL TOPICS FOR MECHANICAL COMPONENTS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340595.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
, and the method used to determine this number are compared to the same information on similar and previously licensed applications and to the acceptance criteria outlined in subsection II above.- Any deviations from previous accepted practice are noted and the applicant is required to justify these deviations. For Code Class 1 and CS components and supports the MEB verifies that for each transient loading condition or combination an acceptable Code service limit has been specified, i.e., Design, Level A, Level B, Level C, or Level D as specified in Reference 7. Any deviations that have not been justified to the satisfaction of the staff are identified and the finding is transmitted to the applicant with a request that, unless conformance with the MEB acceptance criteria is agreed upon, additional technical justification be submitted. 2. The information pertaining to-computer programs which is presented.in the applicant's SAR is reviewed as follows: a. The list of programs is evaluated to determine that the applicant has adequately described each program with respect to the type of analysis that is performed and the specific components to which the program is applied. b.. The submitted computer solutions to the test problems required in subsection II.2 of this SRP section are reviewed and compared to the test solutions. Satisfactory.agreement of computer and test solutions, usually within a +5% error band, provides verification of the quality and adequacy of the computer programs to perform the functions for which they were designed. Any deviations that have not been justified to the satisfaction of the staff are identified and the finding is transmitted to the applicant with a request that, unless conformance with the MEB acceptance criteria is agreed upon, additional technical justification be submitted. 3. If the applicant elects to use experimental stress analysis techniques in lieu of theoretical stress analyses, sufficient information must be presented in the