Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dd4f84a9-8976-44c4-b631-d7c0254f4efc
Document Type: srp
Title: PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND SEVERE ACCIDENT EVALUATION FOR
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1416/ML14161A594.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
19. C. Prior to the revision to 10 CFR Part 52 in August 2007, regulations required DC applicants to separately submit their PRAs. As a result, Chapter 19 of the design-specific DCDs submitted before the issuance of this rule revision did not include many PRA quantitative results. D. Part of the PRA required by 10 CFR 50.71(h)(1) no later than initial fuel load is the seismic PRA. Since this cannot be completed until the plant is built, Chapter 19 of the DCD must describe the assumed seismic hazard and results of a PRA-based SMA. 7. 10 CFR 52.47(b)(2) states that a DC application must contain an ER as required by 10 CFR 51.55. The Statement of Consideration (72 FR 49443) for the revised 10 CFR Part 52 states that this assessment is distinct from, and in addition to, the requirement in paragraph 10 CFR 52.47(a)(23) to provide a description and analysis of severe accident design features. Requirements for COL Applicants 1. 10 CFR 51.50(c) states that each COL application must include a separate document entitled “Applicant’s Environmental Report - Combined License Stage.” If the COL references a DC, then the COL ER may incorporate by reference the environmental assessment previously prepared by the NRC for the referenced DC. If the DC environmental assessment is referenced, then the COL ER must contain information to demonstrate that the site characteristics for the COL site fall within the site parameters in the DC environmental assessment. 2. 10 CFR 52.79(a)(1) states that each COL application must include the boundaries of the site; the proposed general location of each facility on the site; the seismic, 19.0-8 Draft Revision 3 –November 2014 meteorological, hydrologic, and geologic characteristics of the proposed site (with appropriate consideration of the most severe of the natural phenomena have been historically reported for the site and surrounding area as well as sufficient margin to account for limited accuracy quantity, and time in which the