Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6958f90f-4bf5-4fe1-9ae7-49439fd2deca
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY HARDWARE - INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1603/ML16032A050.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.12
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
may augment the facility illumination system by means of low-light technology to meet the requirements of this section or otherwise implement the protective strategy.” 41. 10 CFR 73.55(j)(3), “All on-duty security force personnel shall be capable of maintaining continuous communication with an individual in each alarm station, and vehicle escorts shall maintain continuous communication with security personnel. All personnel escorts shall maintain timely communication with the security personnel.” 42. 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4), “The following continuous communication capabilities must terminate in both alarm stations required by this section: (i) Radio or microwave transmitted two-way voice communication, either directly or through an intermediary, in addition to conventional telephone service between local law enforcement authorities and the site. (ii) A system for communication with the control room.” 43. 10 CFR 73.55(j)(5), “Non-portable communications equipment must remain operable from independent power sources in the event of the loss of normal power.” 44. 10 CFR 73.70(f), “A record at each onsite alarm annunciation location of each alarm, false alarm, alarm check, and tamper indication that identifies the type of alarm, location, alarm circuit, date, and time. In addition, details of response by facility guards and watchmen to each alarm, intrusion, or other security incident shall be recorded. The license[e] shall retain each record for three years after the record is made.” SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria are described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant should identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance