Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 05908428-2f08-4a4f-8512-996c29c86da8
Document Type: srp
Title: have been revised to address Addendum B of the ASME standard and the revised NEI
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0717/ML071700657.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d to provide information to the decision makers. This SRP section does not focus on the decision-making process itself, which is addressed in the application-specific SRP sections. General This SRP is intended to support the staff in its assessment of the technical adequacy of the PRA model used to generate results to support a risk-informed submittal. As such, it applies to all the parts1 of a PRA that support the results. Review Interfaces Other SRP sections interface with this section as follows: See applicability section. The specific acceptance criteria and review procedures are contained in the referenced SRP sections. II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Requirements Acceptance criteria are based on meeting the relevant requirements of the following Commission regulations: The underlying regulations are identified in the SRP sections which invoke this SRP section. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC’s regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC’s regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. 19.1-5 Revision 2 - June 2007 In order for the NRC staff to conclude that a PRA is of sufficient technical adequacy to support an application, the staff needs to be assured that (1) the parts of the PRA needed to support the application have been appropriately identified and (2) those parts have been performed in a manner consistent with current good PRA practice. The former needs to be addressed as part of the assessment of the application. The latter can be met by determining that the