Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b761625e-90fd-41e3-a3ae-acaea1aabf84
Document Type: srp
Title: should still be met.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070476.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.5.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ady-state air-steam flow. Steady flow is assumed to start with the operation of the postaccident mixing fans. A single failure of one of the fans is assumed. (2) The initial concentration of iodine is assumed uniform throughout the entire containment. (3) The effectiveness of the ice condenser as an iodine removal system is assumed to cease with the meltout of the first ice bed. c. Upper Compartment Spray Credit Plants designed with an upper compartment spray system may claim credit for such. Containment spray systems are reviewed under SRP Section 6.5.2. d. Evaluation The iodine removal effectiveness and the degree of iodine dose mitigation by the ice condenser for the loss-of-coolant accident are determined using the air-steam fan flow rate and the assumptions in Subsections III.1.a and III.1.b. 2. Technical Specifications The technical specifications are reviewed to assure that they require periodic inspections and sampling of the ice in order to confirm the continued state of readiness of the system, i.e., the system meets the chemistry requirements specified in the acceptance criteria of this SRP section. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.21 6.5.4-7 DRAFT Rev. 4 - April 1996 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided by the applicant and that the review and calculations support conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's