Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: f269e894-c94c-4ccb-b41c-6e39aa74f371
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070670253.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 18
Section ID: 18.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
led trade-off studies, technology assessments, or test/experiment reports developed to support the HSI design. In addition, a variety of mockups, prototypes, or similar physical representations of the HSI design may be available for preliminary review of the design implementation. 5. Procedure Development. Generic technical guidelines and sample procedures should be available for review. 6. Verification and Validation. The HFE issues tracking system, described in NUREG-0711, should be reviewed. The actual HSI design or a high-fidelity prototype or simulator of the HSI should be available for the staff to examine in conjunction with the verification reviews. In addition, the staff may witness the integrated system validation evaluations. A documented description of the final HSI design that resulted from the HSI task support verification, HFE design verification, integrated system validation, and issue resolution verification activities should be reviewed. Finally, the installation of the completed design in the plant should be reviewed, if time and resources permit. 7. Human Performance Monitoring. Submittals for the staff's review of an applicant's human performance monitoring program should be made on a case-by-case basis. 8. ITAAC. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 and its subsections. SRP Section 14.3 contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC . When determining the review material that should be submitted on the docket versus retained by the licensee for audit or review by NRC reviewers and inspectors, the key aspect is that the amount of information submitted on the docket must be sufficient to support the staff's safety determination. That is, the final safety analysis report includes information at a level sufficient to enable