Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 7d56ab5c-90b1-42b4-a509-857fbfd674db
Document Type: srp
Title: review.10
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070724.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.4.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
tion has been provided by the applicant and that the applicant's analysis and the staff's independent evaluation support conclusions of the following type, to be included in the AEBPERB staff's safety evaluation report (SER): 29 30 Where the radiological consequences have not been specifically calculated, the findings may be in the following form: The staff concludes that the distances to the exclusion area and to the low population zone boundaries for the (INSERT PLANT NAME) site, in conjunction with the operation of the dose-mitigating ESF engineered safety feature systems, are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the 31 calculated radiological consequences of a postulated control rod drop accident are well within the exposure guidelines as set forth in 10 CFR Part 100, paragraph 11. The staff conclusion is based upon (1) its review of the applicant's analysis of the accident and radiological consequences and (2) the staff review of the same accident for similar plants at a number of sites using the source term assumptions of Regulatory Guide 1.77 and upon the similarity of those plant features for the (INSERT PLANT NAME) which affect the radiological consequences of the rod drop accident. Where the radiological consequences have been calculated, the findings may be of the following form: The staff concludes that the distances to the exclusion area and to the low population zone boundaries for the (INSERT PLANT NAME) site, in conjunction with the operation of the dose mitigating ESF systems, are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the calculated radiological consequences of a postulated control rod drop accident are well within the exposure guidelines as set forth in 10 CFR Part 100, paragraph 11. DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 15.4.9-6 The staff conclusion is based upon (1) its review of the applicant's analysis of the accident and radiological consequences and (2) an independent dose calculation by the staff using the source term assumptions