Document: 10 CFR Part 52
Document ID: 3ab5015e-d63f-44de-9ba7-180a7b64b644
Document Type: cfr
Title: Contents of applications; technical information.
Source: 10 CFR Part 52
Source URL: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-10/part-52/section-52.17
Revision Date: 
Chapter: 
Section ID: 52.17
CFR Part: 52
CFR Title: 10

Content:
If these certifications cannot be obtained, the site safety analysis report must contain information, including a utility plan, sufficient to show that the proposed plans provide reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at the site. Under the option set forth in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, the applicant shall make good faith efforts to obtain from the same governmental agencies certifications that: ( i ) The proposed emergency plans are practicable; ( ii ) These agencies are committed to participating in any further development of the plans, including any required field demonstrations, and ( iii ) That these agencies are committed to executing their responsibilities under the plans in the event of an emergency. ( c ) An applicant may request that a limited work authorization under 10 CFR 50.10 be issued in conjunction with the early site permit. The application must include the information otherwise required by 10 CFR 50.10(d)(3) . Applications submitted before, and pending as of November 8, 2007, must include the information required by § 52.17(c) effective on the date of docketing. ( d ) Each applicant for an early site permit under this part shall protect Safeguards Information against unauthorized disclosure in accordance with the requirements in §§ 73.21 and 73.22 of this chapter , as applicable. [ 72 FR 49517 , Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 57447 , Oct. 9, 2007; 73 FR 63571 , Oct. 24, 2008; 78 FR 34249 , June 7, 2013; 78 FR 75450 , Dec. 12, 2013; 87 FR 68031 , Nov. 14, 2022; 88 FR 80078 , Nov. 16, 2023] Footnotes - 52.17 [ 1 ] The fission product release assumed for this evaluation should be based upon a major accident, hypothesized for purposes of site analysis or postulated from considerations of possible accidental events. Such accidents have generally been assumed to result in substantial meltdown of the core with subsequent release into the containment of