Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 06ca0ca1-d4e9-478b-ad5d-c52597a36b46
Document Type: srp
Title: COOLANT SOURCE TERMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1305/ML13058A173.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ust 2014 10 CFR 52.79(a)(17), as stated in 10 CFR 50.34(f). These cross-cutting review areas should be addressed by the reviewer for each technical subsection, with the relevant conclusions documented in the corresponding SER section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation findings section was revised by expanding the discussions on the results of the staff’s evaluation and conclusion of acceptability against cited regulations and guidance. The revisions address: 1. compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 61, as it relates to the analyses conducted using the guidance in SRP Section 11.2 using BTP 11-6, and SRP Section 11.3 using BTP 11-5. 2. compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 requirements on liquid and gaseous effluent concentration limits and occupational radiation protection. 3. development of radioactive source terms using RG 1.112, NUREG-0016, NUREG-0017, or ANSI/ANS 18.1-1999 and whether specific adjustments are made in consideration of specific design and operating features of the proposed reactor design. 4. proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the design and resulting effects on the development of associated radioactive source terms. 5. confirmation that the approach used in an ESP application in developing effluent source terms, as a plant parameter envelope, is consistent with the identified type of reactor design and conservatively bounding over all expected radionuclides and releases. V. IMPLEMENTATION The implementation section was revised by expanding the discussions on the evaluation of ESP, DC, COL applications. The expanded discussion address differences between standard plant design features, COL applications, and SRP acceptance criteria, and provide guidance on the acceptability of alternative methods in complying with cited regulations and SRP acceptance criteria. VI. REFERENCES The following references were added in support of the expanded discussions presented in areas of review, acceptance criteria,