Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 31ff3f0e-f244-4abe-84d4-6f39185af672
Document Type: srp
Title: -19
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1305/ML13059A367.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
Draft Revision 2 – April 2014 conforms to the framework established in RS-002 for determining whether the staff finds that Commission requirements of 10 CFR 52.24 for issuance of an ESP have been met. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The staff’s generic review includes the following: 1. The staff review is based on the acceptance criteria stated in Section II of this SRP. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. Identifying the differences between the guidance in this SRP section and the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for the facility, and discussing how the proposed alternative provides an acceptable method of complying with the regulations that underlie the acceptance criteria, is sufficient to meet the intent of 10 CFR 52.17. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff must review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method for complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Section II of this SRP. 2. The staff reviews the applicant’s licensing bases describing the considerations of site characteristics affecting the development of security plans and measures. The reviewer determines whether the applicant considered site characteristics identified in Section I of this SRP for evaluating effects on developing security measures and plans. This section provides the basis for acceptance of the application for consideration of further technical review for the ESP. The failure to provide, in the contents of the application, any information considering site characteristics potentially affecting developing security plans and measures is a justification and technical basis for not proceeding with further technical review of an ESP application. 3. The information submitted on the docket will be reviewed to determine whether reasonable assurance has been provided that the issuance of the ESP will meet the