Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 3a8a905e-fe11-43fd-ba6c-917507daa823
Document Type: srp
Title: COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODES AND STANDARDS RULE, 10 CFR §  50.55a
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070441.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.2.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
erly classified in Table x.x-x of the SAR as ASME Section III, Class 2 (Quality Group B) or Class 3 (Quality Group C). These components are acceptably classified as Quality Group B or C based upon the staff's guidance for component quality group classification described in SRP Section 3.2.2 and are constructed as ASME Section III, Class 2 or 3 components. Table x.x-x identifies the component Code, Code Edition, applicable DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 5.2.1.1-6 Addenda, and, when required, the order date for each Quality Group B and C component.50 WeThe staff reviewed the component Code, Code Edition, and Addenda as applied to 51 each of these reactor coolant pressure boundary components and we findand finds that 52 53 they are constructed in accordance with the requirements of the applicable Codes and Addenda that are specified by the rules of 10 CFR 50.55a. OurThe staff's review of 54 Quality Group B (ASME Section III, Class 2) and Quality Group C (ASME Section III, Class 3)quality group classifications for components of other fluid systems important to 55 safety is performeddescribed in Section 3.2.2 of the SERsafety evaluation report 56 (SER).57 The applicant has met the requirements of General Design Criterion 1 with respect to components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary being designed to assureensure 58 59 that component quality is commensurate with the importance of the safety function of the reactor coolant pressure boundary. The provisions of the ASME Code hasand the staff's guidance regarding component quality group classification described in SRP Section 3.2.2 have been met, which constitutes an acceptable basis for satisfying the 60 requirements of General Design Criterion 1. For design certification reviews, the findings will also summarize, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other safety evaluation report sections, the staff’s evaluation of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), including design acceptance