Document: NRC Regulatory Guide
Document ID: cf64153e-7623-469c-a3f9-b57ba0f5497d
Document Type: regulatory_guide
Title: Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Integrity + HISTORY - HISTORY 01/2006 – Periodic Review of Revision 1 – No Issues Identified
Source: NRC Regulatory Guide Division 1
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003739936.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 
Section ID: RG-1.14
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
properties should be evaluated and justified for this application. 'Copies may be obbtined from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York, New York 10017. USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nciler Regulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public Regulatory Commission. Washongton. D.C. 2 , Attention: Dockeling end methods acceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff In evalu- The guides are issued in the following ten broad divisions: sting specific problems or postulated accidents. or to provide guidance to appli cents. Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations, end compliance 1: Power Reactors S. Products with them is not required. Methods and solutions different from those set out in 2. Research end Test Reactors 7. Transportation the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to 3' Fuels and Materiasi Facilities "8. Occupational Health the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission. 4. Environmental end Siting 9. Antitrust Review Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged 5. Materials and Plant Protection 10. General at all times, and guides will be revised. as appropriate, to accommodate com ments and to reflect new information or experience. However. comments on Copies of published guides may be obtained by written requeat indicating the this guide, if received within about two months after its issuance, will be par. divisions desired to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington. D.C. ticularly useful in evaluating the need for an early revision. 21, Attention: Director, Office of Standards Development. Revision 1 Au"ust 1975 The non-ductile fracture analysis called for in regulatory position C.2.d should be based on appropriate