Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6c5bc79e-d6b5-4e1b-a807-bb899a80abf0
Document Type: srp
Title: SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550023.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. Construction Permit, Operating License and Combined License Reviews The following statements should be preceded by a summary of the site characteristics and parameters used for the plant: As set forth above, the applicant has presented and substantiated information to establish the site location and description. The staff has reviewed the information provided and, for the reasons given above, concludes that is sufficient for the staff to evaluate compliance with the siting evaluation factors in 10 CFR Part 100.3, as well as with the radiological consequence evaluation factors in 10 CFR 50.34(a)(1) for CPs, and 10 CFR 52.79(a)(1) for COLs. The staff further concludes that the applicant provided sufficient details about the site location and site description to allow the staff to evaluate, as documented in Sections 2.1.2, 2.1.3, and 13.3 and Chapters 11 and 15 of this SER, whether the applicant has met the relevant requirements of 10 CFR Part 52.79(a)(1) and 10 CFR Part 100 with respect to determining the acceptability of the site. 2. Early Site Permit Reviews The following statements should be preceded by a summary of the site characteristics and design parameters to be included in any ESP that might be issued for the ESP site: As set forth above, the applicant has presented and substantiated information to establish the site location and description. The staff has reviewed the information provided and, for the reasons given above, concludes that the applicant has established site characteristics and design parameters acceptable to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 52.17(a)(1) and 10 CFR Part 100.3, as well as with the radiological consequence evaluation factors in 10 CFR 50.34(a)(1). The staff further concludes that the applicant provided sufficient details about the