Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ea218ea5-8c28-47c2-a9c3-b5dff7a4100f
Document Type: srp
Title: of the SAR confirms that the appropriate acceptance criteria and
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350477.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
guidelines have been identified as applicable for these systems. The review of the information systems important to safety in this section of the SAR confirms that these systems conform to the requirements of the acceptance criteria and guidelines. The branch technical positions are used when a particular design problem and an acceptable solution have been identified. The acceptance criteria applicable to the the information systems important to safety are: 1. General Design Criterion 2, "Design Basis for Protection Against Natural Phenomena." 2. General Design Criterion 4, "Environmental and Missile Design Basis." General Design Criteria 2 and 4 are applicable to variables which are classified as Category 1 and 2 In Regulatory Guide 1.97. 3. General Design Criterion 13, "Instrumentation and Control." 4. General Design Criterion 19, "Control Room." Regulatory Guides, Branch Technical Positions and industry standards that provide information, recommendations and guidance and in general describe a basis acceptable to the staff that may be used to implement the requirements of the Commission regulations identified above are given in SRP Section 7.1, Table 7-1 (Ref. 1) and SRP Appendix 7-A (Ref. 2). In addition, Task Action Plan items are also implemented to meet the regulations as identified in SRP Section 7.1, Table 7-2 (Ref. 3). 7.5-2 Rev. 3 - February 1984 III. REVIEW PROCEDURES This subsection describes the general procedures to be followed in reviewing the information systems important to safety. The bases for the evaluation of conformance to the requirements of the acceptance criteria and guidelines may be based upon referenced approved designs. The category of referenced approved designs include topical reports, standard design approvals, and designs of systems which have been previously reviewed and approved by the Commission. If any aspect of a design is not identical to that which is referenced, an evaluation must be made to address the adequacy of the