Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 9b735916-a58a-4bd3-b7e0-826b84cb6e43
Document Type: srp
Title: FRACTURE PREVENTION OF CONTAINMENT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070465.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
echnical Rationale for GDC's 1, 16, and 51. Technical Rationale Technical Rationale is a new SRP-UDP format item. 26. Editorial Discussion regarding Regulatory Guide 1.26 was moved from Subsection II, Acceptance Criteria.. This discussion is not an acceptance criteria, but rather an explanation of why certain acceptance criteria exist. The discussion is more appropriate in the new Technical Rationale subsection. The text of this discussion was updated to reflect terminology used in the current revision of Regulatory Guide 1.26. 27. Reference verification Revised to reflect that Subsection NE is within Section III, Division 1 of the Code. 28. Integrated Impact 283 The first paragraph of Review Procedures was modified to refer to ASME Code Section III, Article NE- 2300 consistent with previously added specific criteria. 29. SRP-UDP Guidance, Implementation Added standard paragraph to address application of of 10 CFR 52 Review Procedures in design certification reviews. 30. Editorial Deleted "OF" from the subsection title for consistency with other SRP Sections. 31. Editorial For clarity and consistency with other sections, modified the lead in sentence for the Evaluation Findings subsection to read in part "sufficient to support statements and conclusions of the following type." 32. Editorial Moved the conclusion paragraph up and added "This conclusion is based on the following:" to facilitate adding subsequent revisions to the Evaluation Findings subsection. Also numbered the Evaluation Findings items for clarity and consistency with other sections. 33. Integrated Impact 283 Added a new item to the Evaluation Findings subsection to discuss findings pertinent to ASME Code Section III, Article NE-2300 and provided for a contingent finding based on whether materials were fracture toughness tested. 34. Editorial Added a lead in phrase for the second evaluation finding. This clarifies the item and facilitates adding a new evaluation finding item 1. 35. Editorial Added a