Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 29ea352c-081e-469e-95b8-7278f6da64ce
Document Type: srp
Title: FRACTURE PREVENTION OF CONTAINMENT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0636/ML063600407.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
tated in the Summer 1977 Addenda, ASME Code Section III. The reviewer verifies that the Class 2 requirements of the Summer 1977 Addenda of ASME Section III Code have been met by the applicant. 6.2.7-6 Revision 1 - March 2007 2. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that reasonable assurance has been provided that the materials of the reactor containment pressure boundary, under operating, maintenance, testing and postulated accident conditions, will not undergo brittle fracture, and that the probability of rapidly propagating fracture will be minimized, so that the requirements of General Design Criteria 1, 16, and 51 will be met. This conclusion is summarized