Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: d7254cf8-c034-434f-b7d8-6eb96075d286
Document Type: srp
Title: PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070439.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4.11
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
normal occurrence. 4. The steam condensing capacity of the tank compared to with the largest anticipated plant 3 step load decrease. 5. The instrumentation provided to measure and indicate pressurizer relief tank pressure, temperature, and liquid level, and to signal the operator in the event of abnormal parameters. 6. The tank rupture disk relief capacity compared to with the capacity of the pressurizer relief and safety valves. Review Interfaces4 The review of the pressurizer relief tank system will involve reviews performed by other branches. The results of these reviews will be coordinated by ASBthe SPLB to complete the 5 overall evaluation of the system. The evaluations performed by others are as follows: 6 A. The Reactor Systems Branch (RSBSRXB ) will determine that the anticipated and 7 maximum pressurizer relief and safety valve discharge rates are acceptable based on a review of the limiting transient and will determine that the piping between the valves and the tank is adequately sized as part of its primary review responsibility for Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 5.2.2. 8 B. The Materials Engineering Branch (MTEB)The Civil Engineering and Geosciences Branch (ECGB) will verify that inservice inspection requirements are met for system 9 components as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 6.6 and, upon request, will verify the compatibility of the materials of construction with service conditions. C. The Materials and Chemical Engineering Branch (EMCB), upon request, will verify the compatibility of the materials of construction with service conditions.10 D. The Mechanical Engineering Branch (MEBEMEB ) will confirm that the system is 11 designed in accordance with applicable codes and standards as part of its primary responsibility for SRP Sections 3.9.1 through 3.9.3. The MEB, also,EMEB also12 determines the acceptability of the seismic and quality group classifications for system components as part of its primary review