Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 9c6c6c9f-7e30-4d2b-ab07-6d21773f319d
Document Type: srp
Title: INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS - INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070660624.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
view of seismic qualification which reviews the ITAAC relating to seismic qualification demonstration for I&C equipment. 16. Coordinate with the organization responsible for the review of human-system interfaces which evaluates the ITAAC demonstrating the adequacy of the human factors aspects of the design, such as arrangement and location of I&C equipment, the capabilities of the I&C to support execution of the operating procedures and emergency response guides, and that qualified plant staff and training required to operate I&C equipment have been provided. 17. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 18. Implementation of ITAAC will be inspected in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter IMC-2503, “Construction Inspection Program - ITAAC Inspections.” IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided to satisfy SRP Section 14.3 and