Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dfad5166-86ba-4d57-a49c-4a918bb0780d
Document Type: srp
Title: and Section 2.4.9, as described in the corresponding SRP sections.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0701/ML070100647.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.4.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ve2 than the corresponding staff's assessment. All safety-related SSC should be protected against flooding by siting them above the highest flood water surface elevation or providing adequate flooding protection. Details of flooding protection measures are reviewed in SER Section 2.4.10. 10. Consideration of Other Site-Related Evaluation Criteria: The staff reviews the potential effects of site-related proximity, seismic, and non-seismic information as they relate to floods in the vicinity of the proposed plant site and site regions and verifies that plant design bases appropriately account for these effects. 10 CFR Part 100 describes site-related proximity, seismic, and non-seismic evaluation criteria for power reactor applications. Subpart A to 10 CFR Part 100 addresses the requirements for applications before January 10, 1997 and Subpart B is for applications on or after January 10, 1997. The staff’s review will include evaluation of pertinent information to determine if these criteria are appropriately used in postulation of worst- case flooding scenario at the proposed plant site. The effects of these criteria on individual flooding mechanisms are reviewed in the respective SRP sections. 2.4.2-12 Revision 4 - March 2007 11. Review Procedures Specific to 10 CFR Part 52 Application Type A. Early Site Permit Reviews: Subpart A to 10 CFR Part 52 specifies the requirements and procedures applicable to the Commission's review of an ESP application for approval of a proposed site. Information required in an ESP application includes a description of the site characteristics and design parameters of the proposed site. The scope and level of detail of review of data parallel that used for a CP review. In the absence of certain circumstances, such as a compliance or adequate protection issue, 10 CFR 52.39 precludes the staff from imposing new site characteristics, design parameters, or terms and conditions on the ESP at the COL stage. Accordingly, the reviewer should