Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 18531882-4fec-4320-bc9b-5ab394ec1b65
Document Type: srp
Title: -
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1818/ML18183A044.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.5.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
9(a)(iii), 10 CFR 100.23(c), and 10 CFR 100.23(d)(2)) the conclusion in the SER should state that investigations and analyses performed and information provided support for the applicant's conclusions regarding suitability of the proposed nuclear power plant site in relation to potential for future surface deformation. Licensing and permitting conditions established by staff to resolve any significant deficiency identified in the application should be stated in sufficient detail to make clear the precise nature of the concerns and the required resolution. The reviewer should also evaluate the application for any potentially significant new information derived geologic, seismic, geophysical, and geotechnical investigations in the site region that had not been previously applied to tectonic and ground motion models used in the PSHA, and provide that information to reviewers in SRP Section 2.5.2. For COL applications that do not reference a previous ESP, staff evaluation findings will include the evaluation findings identified below for ESP reviews. For a COL referencing a previous ESP, staff should refer to the pervious ESP and include an evaluation of any new pertinent information that might have been discovered after the ESP was issued that affects the design and operability of the proposed facility. For a CP application, staff evaluation findings will be similar to the ESP findings. For an OL application, staff findings will include an evaluation of excavations for safety-related structures. 6. Early Site Permit Reviews A typical staff finding at the conclusion of the review of an ESP is as follows: