Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: fac9de93-e631-4c47-9034-708e2dcf2790
Document Type: srp
Title: of the ABWR FSER which includes a review of
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070372.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.5.1.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
section to identify those SSC that have a safety concern involving missile protection. 39. Editorial. Use of the term "safety-related SSC" is not comprehensive and was therefore replaced with broader term "SSC important to safety." Use of the term "SSC important to safety" is consistent with GDC 4 and with the terminology used in the remainder of the section to identify those SSC that have a safety concern involving missile protection. 40. Editorial. deleted the "and" to make this series of items grammatically correct. 41. Editorial. Use of the term "safety-related SSC" is not comprehensive and was therefore replaced with broader term "SSC important to safety." Use of the term "SSC important to safety" is consistent with GDC 4 and with the terminology used in the remainder of the section to identify those SSC that have a safety concern involving missile protection. 42. Integrated Impact # 788. The phrase "providing adequate physical separation for redundant systems or components of the system" was added to the second evaluation finding. Adding this information on physical separation makes the evaluation findings consistent with the existing Acceptance Criteria and the added Review Procedures (see item 36). Adding a discussion on physical separation to the evaluation findings is also consistent with the evaluation findings as documented in section 3.5.1.2 of the ABWR FSER and the ABB-CE FSER. 43. Editorial. Added the "and" to make this series of items grammatically correct. SRP Draft Section 3.5.1.2 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 3.5.1.2-12 44. Integrated Impact # 535. Added a third evaluation finding to address the controls implemented to ensure all unsecured maintenance equipment inside containment does not become a missile. The corresponding review procedure contains the details on the possible controls to be used. This evaluation finding is consistent with the staff reviews and guidance