Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: bbe13c46-bc12-4c59-9966-19a63f926116
Document Type: srp
Title: evaluate source terms and doses from gaseous effluents and solid wastes.  In turn,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1007/ML100740449.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
the environment, and avoid interconnections with potable and sanitary water systems and concludes that the measures proposed by the applicant are consistent with the requirements of GDCs 60 and 61 and guidance of RG 1.143 for liquids and liquid wastes produced during normal operation and AOOs. 8. The staff has reviewed the provisions incorporated in the applicant's design in mitigating the release of radioactive materials resulting from the postulated failure of a liquid waste tank located outside of containment. The staff concludes that the analysis provided by the applicant is consistent with the guidelines of BTP 11-6 and meets the acceptance criteria defined in BTP 11- 6 for an offsite individual using the nearest source of potable water for direct human consumption or indirectly through animals, crops, and food processing. Alternatively, for plant systems and/or site characteristics not meeting the acceptance criteria defined in BTP 11- 6, the staff has evaluated and found the proposed special design features acceptable in mitigating the effects of a postulated tank failure. In its conclusion, the staff will use the appropriate statement contained in BTP 11-6 that is consistent with the applicant=s approach and the staff=s evaluation and findings of reasonable assurance that the alternate approach is protective of public health and safety and environment. For DC and COL reviews, the findings will also summarize the staff=s evaluation of requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters) and COL action items relevant to this SRP section. In addition, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other SER sections, the findings will summarize the staff's evaluation of the ITAAC, including design acceptance criteria, as applicable. 11.2-18 Revision 4 - May 2010 For an ESP application, the staff concludes that the applicant has provided an assessment that demonstrates its capability to comply with Appendix I, "Numerical Guides for