Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 44fbbafe-9ec4-4d11-886e-6bccb8feeb4f
Document Type: srp
Title: .2-7
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0415/ML041550746.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
lity. M. REVIEW PROCEDURES In preparation to review the SAR and the license transfer application, the reviewer should familiarize himself or herself with the documents listed as references to this SRP section. Each element of the SAR or transfer application is to be reviewed against this SRP section. The reviewer's judgment during the review is to be based on the material presented, whether items of special safety significance are involved, and the uniqueness of the facility. Any exceptions or alternatives are to be carefully examined to ensure that they are clearly defined and adequately justified. The applicant should identify the applicable version of references, regulatory guides, and codes and standards used. The reviewer should identify the applicable version of references, regulatory guides, and codes and standards used in the review. In reviewing information about the operating organization, the following points should be considered: A. During the early stages of construction or plant design, the applicant will generally not have made selections for plant staff positions. The reviewer, therefore, examines this section of the SAR for a commitment to conform to the stated acceptance criteria. B. The reviewer must recognize that there are many acceptable ways to define and delegate job responsibilities. Variations in staffing may also be expected between applicants with and 13.1.2-8 DRAFT Rev. 5: AUGUST2004 without experience in nuclear plant operation. It is important that the reviewer verify that applicants lacking in experience do not underestimate the magnitude of the task and that all applicants adequately consider the potential effects of human error. Guidance on human error considerations may be found in NITREG-0711, Chapter 7, "Element 6- Human Reliability Analysis." The reviewer should be alert to the possibility that too much work may be put on too few people. The reviewer should also consider that the structure of onsite technical support and