Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 42f941d3-4815-4bc5-bf81-f2dab04a7aa7
Document Type: srp
Title: SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FUNCTIONAL DESIGN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070459.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
strative 57 control will be exercised over the secondary containment openings, such as personnel access doors and equipment hatches. SCSB determines from the descriptive information in the SAR 58 that all doors and hatches are provided with position indicators having readout and alarm capability in the main control room. The SCSB will ascertain that normally open doors were 59 considered in the analyses of the functional capability of the secondary containment system. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.60 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided and that his evaluation supports conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The scope of review of the functional design of the secondary containment system for the (Plant name) has included plan and elevation drawings, system drawings, and descriptive information. This system is provided to control the atmosphere within the secondary containment and contiguous areas. The review has included the applicant's proposed design bases and analyses of the functional capability of the secondary containment system. The staff concludes that the containment functional design is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 4, 16 and 43 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 61 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 6.2.3-10 J . The conclusion is based on the following: