Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: f8bc8041-a489-4abd-909e-16f7d7e54f70
Document Type: srp
Title: -
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0622/ML062210398.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
in Section III.C.2. Each secondary review branch will verify and document the adequacy of the licensee’s justification for test exceptions that are within the branch’s technical area of review. 2. Specific Acceptance Criteria If the licensee proposes not to perform a test (or tests) that would normally be included in the EPU test program pursuant to the criteria contained in Sections III.A and III.B above, the reviewer should provide assurance that sufficient justification has been provided. Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, the proposed EPU test program must demonstrate that SSCs will perform satisfactorily in service. The reviewer should consider the following factors when assessing the adequacy of the licensee’s justification: a. Power Uprate Operating Experience If the licensee proposes to omit a test (or tests) from the EPU testing program based on favorable power uprate operating experience, the reviewer should determine the applicability of the operating experience to the specific plant requesting the EPU. The reviewer should consider similarities in plant design and equipment; uprated power level; plant modifications, setpoint August 2006