Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: f65f0aa7-1e49-4552-ae98-0c2bd6ad430e
Document Type: srp
Title: TURBINE GLAND SEALING SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070591.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 10
Section ID: 10.4.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
he source of sealing steam and the disposition of steam and noncondensables vented from the gland seal. The review includes the radiological processing and monitoring provisions in accordance with SRP Sections 11.3 and 11.5. 3. ETSB reviews the quality assurance for the design, construction, and operational phases for the turbine gland sealing system according to the guidelines of Regulatory Guides and 1.123 (Refs. 3 and 4). Exceptions are transmitted to QAB which has primary responsibility under SRP Sections 17.1 and 17.2.33 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.34 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS ETSBSPLB verifies that sufficient information has been provided and that the review is adequate to support conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The turbine gland sealing system includes the equipment and instruments to provide a source of sealing steam to the annulus space where the turbine and large steam valve shafts penetrate their casings. The scope of our review included the source of sealing 10.4.3-5 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 steam and the provisions incorporated to monitor and control releases of radioactive material in effluents. The staff concludes that the turbine gland sealing system design is acceptable in that the applicant has met the requirements of General Design Criteria 60 and 64 with respect to the control and monitoring of releases of