Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 25e52c07-8f43-4a33-a908-01ec9eb02d06
Document Type: srp
Title: LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1304/ML13044A644.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ial bypasses, the review considers improper connection to nonradioactive systems and the possibility of uncontrolled and unmonitored liquid releases. This information is used to calculate the quantity of radioactive materials released annually in liquid effluents during normal operation, including AOOs, using parameters listed in the application, the BWR-GALE Code or PWR-GALE Code, and calculation techniques of NUREG-0016 or NUREG-0017 using the guidance in RG 1.112 and ANSI/ANS 18.1-1999, as modified to reflect specific design features. In such instances, the evaluation should confirm that the applicant has submitted sufficient information for the staff to conduct an independent evaluation of proposed modifications or alternative methods for estimating yearly releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents, using the SRP acceptance criteria and supporting regulatory guides. The result of this calculation will be used to determine whether the proposed treatment system design meets acceptance criterion 1.C of Subsection II of this SRP section and relevant acceptance criteria of SRP Section 11.1, on the basis of the radioactive source terms. Conformance with acceptance criterion 1.A, given in Subsection II of this SRP section, concerning exposures to the total body or critical organ of an individual in an unrestricted area will be determined based on dose and source term calculations performed by NRC staff using the guidance in NUREG-0016 or NUREG-0017, RGs 1.112 and 1.113, and NUREG/CR-4013 (LADTAP II Code). 11.2-22 Draft Revision 5 – August 2014 Conformance with acceptance criterion 1.B, given in Subsection II of this SRP Section, concerning the cost-benefit analysis will be determined based on analyses performed by NRC staff, including population cumulative dose (person-Sv (person-rem)) calculations and cost-benefit analyses. In its review, the staff has considered the potential effectiveness of augmenting the proposed LWMS using items of reasonably