Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b022cddb-8d32-4663-9bb0-ba39d9401280
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070626.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ndard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.78 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation finding at thefor a PSAR reviewstage should be substantially equivalent to the 79 following statement: The applicant has provided a general description of plans for protecting the plant against potential acts of radiological sabotage. Provisions for the screening of employees at the plant, and for design phase review of plant layout and protection of vital equipment have 13.6-13 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 been described and conform to 10 CFR Part 73, §73.55. We find there is reasonable assurance that the final physical security plan will meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 25, 10 CFR Part 73, and 10 CFR Part 95 by conforming to regulatory positions in regulatory guides or equivalent guidance. We conclude that the applicant's arrangements for protection of the plant against acts of radiological sabotage are satisfactory for this stage of the licensing process. For design certification reviews, the finding should state that the design as set forth in the standard safety analysis report adequately describes the plant layout and protection of vital equipment in accordance with 10 CFR 73.55 and applicable regulatory guidance, and provides reasonable assurance that the plant design will provide adequate protection against acts of radiological sabotage. The findings will also summarize, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other safety evaluation report sections, the staff's evaluation of inspections, test, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), including design acceptance criteria (DAC), site interface requirements,