Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 611e1a8a-5fb2-4d1d-8b0e-7561bc7e46ac
Document Type: srp
Title: SEISMIC AND DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340654.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.10
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
y other equipment required in accordance with paragraph 2 of subsection I. (3) The summary data sheets for each piece of equipment, i.e., each component, listed. 3.10-10 Rev. 2 - July 1981 III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select and emphasize material from the procedures described below as may be appropriate for a particular case. The reviewer obtains and uses information from SRP Sections 3.7 and 3.9.2 and consults with SEB and MEB as necessary to be assured that the proper seismic and dynamic input motion is being used for the equipment qualification. For each area of review the following review procedures are used: 1. At the CP stage, the staff reviews the program which the applicant has described in the PSAR for the qualification of mechanical and electrical equipment. The program is measured against the requirements listed in subsection II. Of particular interest are the proper use of test and analytical procedures. Equipment which is too complex for reliable mathematical modeling should be tested unless the analytical procedures and.corresponding design are convincingly conservative. Both the test and the analysis methods are reviewed for assurance that all important modes of response will be excited in tests or considered in analysis. Proper consideration of input motions sp as to envelope the required input, whether in terms of response spectra or time history in all necessary directions is verified. The use and treatment of supports is also reviewed. 2. At the OL stage, the staff reviews the program again as described by the applicant in the FSAR. In addition, the SQR may be reviewed for documenta- tion of the successful implementation of the qualification program including test and analysis results.. The reviewer verifies that the applicant's list of systems is consistent with the list provided in accordance with SRP Section 3.2.2. To confirm the extent to which the equipment meets the requirements of subsection II, the staff audits the equipment