Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 817bb0ad-6fd7-433e-aa2b-b4b3e1166f9c
Document Type: srp
Title: PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND SEVERE ACCIDENT EVALUATION FOR
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0717/ML071700652.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 19
Section ID: 19.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
1990, and July 21, 1993, respectively, for prevention (e.g., anticipated transients without scram, mid- loop operation, station blackout, fire protection, and intersystem loss-of-coolant accident) and mitigation (e.g., hydrogen generation and control, core debris coolability, high-pressure core melt ejection, containment performance, dedicated containment vent penetration, equipment survivability). In addition, the review should address the information provided by the applicant to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 52.47(8) or 10 CFR 52.79(a)(17), for a DC or a COL application, respectively. In particular, both regulations invoke 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1)(i) to specify that a design-specific or plant-specific PRA should be performed to seek improvements in core heat removal system reliability and containment heat removal system reliability that are significant and practical and do not excessively impact the plant. 3. PRA-Related ITAAC, COL Action Items, and Other Commitments The staff should review the PRA-related ITAAC, COL action items, and other commitments, including any actions identified or proposed to address them. The applicant’s PRA-based insights table should also identify these items. The staff should note any item that cannot be resolved until after the COL application phase and review the commitments and schedule for resolution of the given items. 19.0-17 Revision 2 - June 2007 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. Following the format and content guidance provided in Appendix A to this SRP section will enhance the efficiency and consistency of the staff review documentation. Deviations from the format may occur for review areas that are not relevant for the specific application and are