Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 94d86f6a-6c87-46a2-93df-ed4b0721bbdd
Document Type: srp
Title: is complete.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070646.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
to be included in an EOP (to minimize cross-referencing) (5.2.2) 4.3.4.3 Method for identifying sections or subsections (e.g., use of tabbing) (5.5.7 and 6.1.4) 4.3.5 When and how to present location Information (equipment, controls and displays) (5.7.11) 4.3.6 Control Room Staffing and Division of Responsibilities (5.8) NOTE: This section addresses the need to consider operating crew staffing and responsibilities during the process of developing EOPs to help ensure efficient and effective implementation of EOPs during an emergency. Deficiencies in this regard may be identified by the applicant during validation/ or verification of the EOPs. Subsection items 4.3.6.1 through 4.3.6.4 may therefore be addressed under validation/ and verification. 4.3.6.1 Structuring of EOPs to ensure that minimum staffing can execute the EOPs 4.3.6.2 Designating the operators' responsibilities in implementing EOPs (i.e., each operator will know what they have to do during an emergency; it is not necessary to specify roles in PGP or EOPs) 4.3.6.3 Sequencing action steps to minimize physical interference between operators 4.3.6.4 Sequencing action steps to avoid their unintentional duplication by operators 4.3.7 Use and Maintenance of EOPs including accessibility and quality of copies (6.0) 4.3.8 Statement of commitment to use Writer's Guide in developing and revising the EOPs 5.0 Program for Validation/ and Verification 13.5.2.1-23 DRAFT Rev. 0 - April 1996 5.1 General Discussion All applicants must submit a description of their programs for validating and verifying their EOPs. Element 10 of NUREG-0711, Human Factors Verification and Validation, provides additional guidance on the development of a verification and validation program. Because of the lack of a consistent and clearcut distinction between "validation" and "verification" within the nuclear industry, the staff has elected to bypass the semantic ambiguity by leaving their definition up to the individual applicants; only the