Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: cf61f16a-4e82-42da-8333-e100f557fd60
Document Type: srp
Title: PLANT DESIGN FOR PROTECTION AGAINST POSTULATED PIPING FAILURES IN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550032.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.6.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
more, the staff reviews the ITAAC to ensure that all SSCs in this area of review are identified and addressed as appropriate in accordance with SRP Section 14.3. 3.6.1-3 Revision 3 - March 2007 8. COL Action Items and Certification Requirements and Restrictions. For a DC application, the review will also address COL action items and requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters). For a COL application referencing a DC, a COL applicant must address COL action items (referred to as COL license information in certain DCs) included in the referenced DC. Additionally, a COL applicant must address requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters) included in the referenced DC. Review Interfaces Other SRP sections interface with this section as follows: 1. The acceptability of seismic classification is evaluated in accordance with SRP Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. 2. The acceptability of design of protective structures (such as those used for protection against piping failures) in connection with the review of other Category I structures is evaluated in accordance with SRP Section 3.8.4. 3. The acceptability of the locations and types of piping failures to be considered, the design of piping restraints and other protective measures, and the resultant dynamic effects is evaluated in accordance with SRP Section 3.6.2. 4. The adequacy of internal flood protection system from piping failures is evaluated in accordance with SRP Section 3.4.1. 5. The evaluation of the environmental effects of pipe rupture, (e.g., temperature, humidity, and spray-wetting) with respect to the functional performance of essential electrical equipment and instrumentation is in accordance with SRP Section 3.11. 6. Review of leak-before-break technology to exclude the dynamic effects of postulated pipe ruptures from the design basis of plant SSCs is in accordance with SRP Section 3.6.3. 7. The acceptability of inservice inspection criteria of