Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 5aa1e4e0-9f6f-46a8-b372-ab029c3c0c94
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY—DESIGN CERTIFICATION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1025/ML102510273.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
physical security elements. COL action items should be identified for those ITAAC-related physical security elements not within the scope of the design that are partially addressed. For the review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DC applicants refer to the FSAR as the design control document. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, the DC FSAR should incorporate the COL action items to ensure that they are addressed during a COL application. After this review, the reviewer should follow SRP Section 14.3, “Standard Plant Designs, Initial Test Program—Final Design Approval,” for the review of Tier I information for the design, including the postulated site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer should verify that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report. The reviewer should also state the bases for these conclusions. For DC reviews, the findings will also summarize the staff’s evaluation of requirements and restrictions (e.g. interface requirements and site parameters) and COL action items relevant to this SRP section. The evaluation finding at the DC stage should be substantially equivalent to the following statement: The applicant provided a description of the design that included specific physical security elements for protecting the plant against potential acts of radiological sabotage and the theft of special nuclear material. The applicant adequately described the design of the physical security elements in