Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 05b84948-e9d0-4dca-bd4b-de304fae469c
Document Type: srp
Title: (8.3)
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070378.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.20
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
resent an undue risk to the health and safety of the public due to aircraft hazards and meets the relevant requirements of General Design Criteria 3 and 4. This conclusion is based on the staff having independently verified the applicant's assessment of aircraft hazards, including aircraft fires and impacts, at the site and that if the appropriate safety-related structures, systems, and components are designed to withstand the aircraft selected as the design basis aircraft, the probability of an aircraft strike causing radiological consequences in excess of the exposure guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100 is less than about 10 per year. -7 For an application referencing a certified plant design that includes aircraft hazards in the site parameter envelope, the reviewer's findings should include a concluding statement similar to the following: The aircraft hazards associated with actual site proximity data for the proposed site are consistent with those for the proximity data identified in the site parameter envelope specified in the certified plant design documents.53 For design certification reviews, the findings will also summarize, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other safety evaluation report sections, the staff's evaluation of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), including design acceptance criteria (DAC), site interface requirements, and combined license action items that are relevant to this SRP section.54 V. IMPLEMENTATION The following is intended to provide guidance to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC staff's plans for using this SRP section. This SRP section will be used by the staff when performing safety evaluations of license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR 50 or 10 CFR 52. Except in those 55 cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 3.5.1.6-10 specified portions of the Commission's regulations, and method