Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 603c5209-c57e-4da8-a912-b154b601eee0
Document Type: esrp
Title: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF STATION OPERATION
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.8.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
igated by design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has identified and determined to be practical. For these cases, the reviewer should consult with the Environmental Project Manager and the reviewers for ESRP 9.4 for verification that the reviewer’s proposed modifications are practical and will lead to an improvement in the benefit-cost balance. The reviewer should prepare a list of verified modifications and identified measures and controls to limit the corresponding impact. These lists should be given to the reviewer for ESRP 5.10. • The impact is adverse, cannot be successfully mitigated, and is of such magnitude that it should be avoided. When impacts of this nature are identified, the reviewer should inform the reviewers for ESRP 9.4 that an analysis and evaluation of alternative designs or procedures is needed. The reviewer should participate in any such analysis and evaluation of alternatives that would avoid the impact and that could be considered practical. If no such alternatives can be identified, the reviewer is responsible for providing this information to the reviewer for ESRP 10.1. The reviewer should categorize impacts as those over which the applicant has some control and those over which the applicant has little or no control. If the applicant has control over impacts, the criteria outlined above should be applied. If the applicant has little or no control over alternatives to mitigate impacts that in the reviewer’s judgment are adverse, then the reviewer should (1) prepare a description of these impacts for inclusion in the EIS, (2) where appropriate, identify potential solutions to the problem that are beyond the jurisdiction of the NRC, and (3) ensure that these impacts are considered in the staff’s final evaluation of the proposed action. The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided in accordance with the requirements of this ESRP and that the evaluation supports the following type of concluding