Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 025e5140-015c-4e77-ad4f-ff52a81956fe
Document Type: srp
Title: WIND LOADING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070570001.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.3.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d in Subsection II. 1. The site-related parameters described in subsection I.1 are reviewed in accordance with SRP Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2. The staff reviewing structures examines these parameters to ensure that they are consistent with those contained in SRP Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2. 2. After the acceptability of the site-related parameters is established, the reviewer proceeds with the evaluation of the structural aspects of wind design. The procedures used by the applicant to transform wind speeds into equivalent pressures are reviewed and compared with those procedures delineated in subsection II of this plan. 3. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The applicant has met the requirements of