Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c53cf2ef-5eb4-4449-bed4-17a9eff508e3
Document Type: srp
Title: SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FUNCTIONAL DESIGN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0636/ML063600406.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ons (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these 6.2.3-9 Revision 3 - March 2007 COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The scope of review of the functional design of the secondary containment system for the [plant name] has included plan and elevation drawings, system drawings, and descriptive information. This system controls the atmosphere within the secondary containment and contiguous areas. The review has included the applicant's proposed design bases and analyses of the functional capability of the secondary containment system. The staff concludes that the secondary containment functional design is acceptable and meets the requirements of GDCs 4, 16, and 43 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J. The conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should discuss each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the