Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 786da65a-4915-4af3-afb3-678b7df5bea7
Document Type: srp
Title: OTHER SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070327.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
early stage of the review process. 2. Applicable Codes, Standards, and Specifications The list of codes, standards, guides, and specifications is compared with the list in subsection II.2 of this SRP section. The reviewer assures himself verifies that the 74 appropriate code or guide is utilized and that the applicable edition and stated effective addenda are acceptable. 3. Loads and Loading Combinations The reviewer verifies that the loads and load combinations are as conservative as those specified in subsection II.3 of this SRP section. Any deviations from the acceptance criteria for loads and load combinations that have not been adequately justified are identified as unacceptable and transmitted to the applicant. 4. Design and Analysis Procedures The reviewer assures himself verifies that for the design and analysis procedures, the 75 applicant is utilizing the ACI-349 Code (Ref. 1) and the AISCANSI/AISC N690-1984 76 77 Specifications for concrete and steel structures (Ref. 3), respectively. 78 Any computer programs that are utilized in the design and analysis of the structure are reviewed to verify their validity in accordance with the acceptance criteria delineated in subsection II.4.e of SRP Section 3.8.1. DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 3.8.4-20 The reviewer assuresensures that the provisions specified in subsection II.4 of this SRP 79 section regarding design report, structural audits and design of spent fuel pool and racks are met. 5. Structural Acceptance Criteria The limits on allowable stresses and strains in the concrete, reinforcement, structural steel, etc., are compared with the corresponding allowable stresses specified in subsection II.5 of this SRP section. If the applicant proposes to exceed some of these limits for some of the load combinations and at some localized points on the structure, the justification provided to show that the structural integrity of the structure will not be affected is evaluated. If such justification is determined to be