Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: d81c8707-d642-437b-b3b6-b895d1fe38c6
Document Type: esrp
Title: MEASURES AND CONTROLS TO LIMIT ADVERSE IMPACTS DURING
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ify and tabulate the impacts of construction (see reviewers for ESRPs 4.1.1 through 4.5 ) that are of sufficient severity to need mitigation (i.e., measures and controls to limit the impact). (2) List the applicant’s commitments for mitigating the impact. (3) Based on consultation with appropriate staff reviewers, identify the applicant commitments that will satisfy the staff’s concerns for mitigation. (4) When it is determined that there are no applicant commitments to control or limit an adverse impact, consult with reviewers for the appropriate ESRPs 4.1 through 4.5, the reviewers for ESRPs 9.4.1 through 9.4.3, and the EPM to identify and evaluate available mitigation measure(s). Also note those impacts for which no appropriate measures and controls to limit the impact can be identified. (5) Prepare a table similar to that shown in Table 4.6-1 to compare potentially adverse impacts of construction with the applicant’s commitments and identify those adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated or for which mitigation is not practical. Table 4.6-1. Summary of Potentially Adverse Impacts of Construction Impact Impact Description Applicant’s Commitment Staff Evaluation Land-Use Impacts impact 1 commitment a evaluation α impact 2 commitment b evaluation β Hydrological and Water Use Impacts impact 3 commitment c evaluation γ impact 4 There are no practical measures for mitigation of this impact. The impact will be considered in the evaluation of unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. Following the analysis above (Steps 1-5), the reviewer should seek confirmation that (1) the tabulated impacts are adverse and that measures and controls to limit the magnitude of the impact are required, (2) the measures and controls are reasonable and specific, and (3) benefits/costs have been considered. To do this, the reviewer should take the following steps: October 1999 4.6-5 NUREG-1555 (1) Confirm that the construction impacts, when considered on a site-specific basis,