Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a397b98f-e122-4d15-8471-5259fb45b58b
Document Type: srp
Title: and BTP 11-6 since the use of durable and passive design features would provide
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1305/ML13051A458.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
dless of the defined maximum inventory of radioactive materials for such tanks or components, these specifications do not relieve the licensee from regulatory requirements and practical considerations associated with radiation protection of plant personnel, such as conducting periodic surveys in monitoring external radiation levels in nearby and surrounding areas, and posting and restricting access to areas and/or rooms where such tanks are located. BTP 11-6-24 Draft Revision 4 – August 2014 PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT The information collections contained in the Standard Review Plan are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20, 10 CFR Part 50, 10 CFR Part 52, and 10 CFR Part 61, and were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval numbers 3150-0014, 3150-0011, 3150-0151, and 3150-0135. PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number. BTP 11-6-25 Draft Revision 4 – August 2014 SRP SECTION 11.2, BTP 11-6 Description of Changes BTP 11-6 “Postulated Radioactive Releases Due To Liquid Containing Tank Failures” This SRP section affirms the technical accuracy and adequacy of the guidance previously provided in BTP 11-6, as referenced in SRP Section 11.2, Revision 3, dated March 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML070720635). Editorial changes added new abbreviations in several places throughout this section and corrected grammatical errors. Other changes reflect the removal of redundant information. Technical changes incorporated in this revision include: I. AREAS OF REVIEW The areas of review, as described in the background and technical position sections, were revised by expanding technical guidance and identifying additional areas that warrant staff reviews and evaluations in assessing the consequences of a postulated failure of a radwaste