Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6b7eddf4-f7ce-4821-9f11-e37070221e57
Document Type: srp
Title: DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1613/ML16133A418.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
s of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing, and postulated accidents, including LOCAs. 4. GDC 14 as it relates to designing SSCs of the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) to have an extremely low probability of rapidly propagating failure and of gross rupture. 5. GDC 15 as it relates to designing the RCS with sufficient margin to assure that the RCPB is not exceeded during normal operating conditions, including anticipated operational occurrences. 6. Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as it relates to quality assurance in the dynamic testing and analysis of SSCs. 7. 10 CFR 52.47(b)(1), which requires that a DC application contain the proposed ITAAC that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, a plant that incorporates the DC is built and will operate in accordance with the DC, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the NRC's regulations; 3.9.2-14 Revision 4 – March 2017 8. 10 CFR 52.80(a), which requires that a COL application contain the proposed inspections, tests, and analyses, including those applicable to emergency planning, that the licensee shall perform, and the acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, the facility has been constructed and will operate in conformity with the COL, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the NRC's regulations. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC’s regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC’s regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features,