Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ccb8326d-5db5-47ed-b8ae-e7f1a1b6f3ed
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING - INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550021.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
onformance with the task analysis implementation plan and include the following functions . . .” 2. If an implementation plan, rather than a completed HFE element, was accepted as part of the design certification process, then ITAAC should address the completion of the HFE program element. 3. If an implementation plan was not reviewed and approved as part of the design certification, then the ITAAC should address both the development of the plan as well as item 2 above. 4. The reviewer will verify that HFE-related ITAAC information is provided based on accepted HFE principles and program elements as discussed in SRP Chapter 18 and incorporated into the plant’s design. 5. HFE-related ITAAC should primarily address verification of products (e.g., the control room, the human-system interfaces, etc.) or results reports from implementing the HFE program element implementation plan. 6. Minimum Inventory of Displays, Alarms and Controls: Tier 1 includes a minimum inventory of displays, controls, and alarms that are necessary to carry out the vendor’s emergency procedure guidelines (i.e., Owners’ Groups Generic Technical Guidelines) and critical actions identified from the applicant’s PRA and task analysis of operator actions. The reviewers evaluation of the minimum inventory will encompass a multi-disciplinary effort consisting of human factors, I&C, PRA, and plant, reactor, and electrical system engineering. The minimum inventory list has been implemented through the rule-making process for four certified designs (10 CFR Part 52 Appendixes A, B, C, and D). The criteria used to determine acceptability of the inventory includes assuring that: (1) the scope of these items in the Generic Technical Guidelines and PRA effort are adequately considered, (2) the task analysis is detailed and comprehensive, (3) RG 1.97, Revision 3, Category 1 variables or RG 1.97, Revision 4, Type A, B, and C variables for accident monitoring are included, and (4) important system