Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 5eb9eb69-3e1a-4815-a65d-fa870db91bee
Document Type: srp
Title: LIGHT LOAD HANDLING SYSTEM AND RELATED REFUELING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1308/ML13085A145.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.1.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
quakes. 9.1.4-4 Draft Revision 4 – June 2013 2. GDC 5 as it relates to the capability of shared equipment and components to perform safety functions. 3. GDC 61 as it relates to radioactivity release as a result of fuel damage and the avoidance of excessive personnel radiation exposure. 4. GDC 62 as it relates to prevention of criticality accidents. 5. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 52.47(b)(1), which requires that a DC application contain the proposed ITAAC that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, a plant that incorporates the DC is built and will operate in accordance with the design certification, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations. 6. 10 CFR 52.80(a), which requires that a COL application contain the proposed inspections, tests, and analyses, including those applicable to emergency planning, that the licensee shall perform, and the acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, the facility has been constructed and will operate in conformity with the COL, the provisions of the AEA, and the NRC regulations. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC regulations identified above are as follows for review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. 1.