Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 42e7682f-df25-4a6a-94f4-7d44ea029702
Document Type: srp
Title: STEAM SYSTEM PIPING FAILURES INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF CONTAINMENT
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070677.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.1.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
auxiliary feedwater systems (AFWS) are reviewed 54 to assureensure conformance to the following TMI Action Plan items (Ref. 6 through 8) compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1)(ii) and 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xii) as they relate to auxiliary feedwater system performance requirements for steam system piping failures.: (a) Items II.E.1. and II.K.2.1, (b) Items II.E.1.2 and II.K.2.8.55 7. The influence of reactor coolant pump trip during ECCS initiation is reviewed to assure conformance to the ensure compliance with the requirements of TMI Action Plan item II.K.3.5 and the resolution thereto contained in References 9 through 17. (Ref. 6 through 8). Should tripping of the reactor coolant pumps require manual action, delays in 56 operation actions must be assessed. DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 15.1.5-12 8. The reliability and integrity of the reactor coolant pump seals during loss of alternating-current power and loss of coolant to the seals (i.e.e.g., resulting from 57 containment isolation) are reviewed to assureensure conformance to the TMI Action Plan items II.K.2.16, II.K.3.25, and II.K.3.40.compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1)(iii).58 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.59 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the SAR contains sufficient information and his that the review 60 supports the following kinds of statements and conclusions, which should be