Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c9bc1f45-238e-4755-9681-aa85f00d20b9
Document Type: srp
Title: MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0704/ML070460302.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ection I, "Areas of Review," have been addressed. 6. A comparison of the information with the acceptance criteria of subsection II "Acceptance Criteria." 7. A review of information provided by the NRC regional office position statement on the applicant's organizational and administrative commitments made in the SAR, if applicable. 8. Verification of the management structure and technical resources by visits to the applicant’s corporate headquarters and the site, if applicable. Based on the foregoing, the reviewer then determines the overall acceptability of the applicant's management and technical-support organization and staffing plans. For OL transfers under 10 CFR Part 50, the existing organization was found acceptable for operations as part of the initial licensing review. Therefore, the review in support of a license transfer should focus on the organizational changes proposed as a result of the transfer. The reviewer should ensure that the proposed changes will result in an organization that will continue to meet the relevant review criteria. For reviews of COL applications under 10 CFR Part 52, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design set forth in the safety analysis report, and if applicable, site interface requirements meet the acceptance criteria. With respect to COL application, the scope of the review is independent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC-approved material, applications, and/or reports. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The reviewer verifies that the information presented supports conclusions of the following type in the staff's safety evaluation report: The staff concludes that the management and technical