Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: eedf1a7c-578e-463a-9608-b06af6312cf1
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1310/ML13108A095.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 18
Section ID: 18.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
��s determination that all review criteria are satisfied, using the methods described in the SRP. 2. The reviewer’s determination that alternative means of satisfying review criteria are acceptable. 3. The reviewer’s determination that acceptable justification for deviations from review criteria exist. 4. Documentation of findings: The evaluation for each acceptance criterion typically has three parts. The first part summarizes what the submittal says and where that information is located. The second part explains how this information conforms to the acceptance criteria. The third part provides a summary conclusion that the acceptance criterion is met. Consider the following lessons learned as these parts are written: 18.0-15 Draft Revision 3 – July 2015 • Use the word “requirement” only when referring to the Code of Federal Regulations. Use specification, acceptance criterion, guidance, direction, limit or other appropriate word when referring to other sources of direction. • Within the SER, ensure the staff evaluation is clearly distinguishable from the submittal information summary. • Write requests for additional information (RAIs) in parallel with writing the draft SER. This ensures a tight connection with the regulatory basis and minimizes sequential RAIs. • Consider using audits to review the style guide, scenarios, supporting procedures, and operating simulators. The audit can often provide the additional detail needed to understand documents that have been submitted and facilitates the communication between applicant/licensee and the staff on what information needs to be docketed. • When determining the review material that should be submitted on the docket versus retained by the licensee for audit or review by NRC reviewers and inspectors, the key aspect is that the amount of information submitted on the docket must be sufficient to support the staff's safety determination. That is, the submittal (e.g., design certification, final