Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 070a558a-dd64-4d4c-b104-780f0d1c49a3
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT FUNCTIONAL DESIGN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340652.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
n depends, and the applicant's analysis of postulated accidents and operational occurrences which support the adequacy of the design bases. The basis for the staff's acceptance has been conformance of designs and design bases for the containment building, internal structures, and associated systems, components, and structures to the Commission's regula- tions as set forth in the general design criteria, and to applicable regulatory guides, branch technical positions, and industry codes and standards. (Special problems or exceptions that the staff takes to the design or functional capability of containment structures, systems, and components should be discussed.) To support the basis for the staff's acceptance of the containment system, the reviewer of the containment system should include in the staff's safety evaluation report, as necessary, the results of the reviews for the seven SRP sections above. The SER writeup should demonstrate con- formance with the Commission regulations in the manner indicated. The staff concludes that the containment functional design is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 16, 50, 52 and 53. The conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should discuss each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the requirements of (cite regulation) with respect to (state limits of review in relation to regulation) by (for each item that is applicable to the review, state how it was met and why acceptable with respect to regulation being discussed): 6.2.1-3 Rev. 2 - July 198] a. meeting the regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide _ or Guides; b. providing and meeting an alternative method to regulatory posi- tions in Regulatory Guide _ that the staff has reviewed and found to be acceptable; c. meeting the regulatory position in BTP; d. using calculational methods for (state what was evaluated) that has been previously reviewed by the staff and found acceptable;