Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 5eb2dc52-e4fd-4516-96e8-78311f9c289e
Document Type: srp
Title: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - DESIGN CERTIFICATION,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1403/ML14035A202.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 17
Section ID: 17.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
inspected in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter IMC-2504, “Construction Inspection Program – Inspection of Construction and Operational Programs.” For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design set forth in the FSAR meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. 17.5-40 Draft Revision 1 – August 2014 For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's SE report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. On the basis of the staff’s detailed review and evaluation of the QAPD in the (topical report, SAR or DCD) for (facility), we conclude the following: 1. The application includes an evaluation of the facility against this SRP section. Alternatives to or differences from this SRP section as described in the applicable section of this SE are acceptable. 2. The QAPD acceptably describes the authority and responsibility of management and supervisory personnel, performance/verification personnel, and audit personnel. 3. The organizations and persons responsible for performing the verification and