Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 1e78f301-fdfe-4282-ad5d-deca072361fa
Document Type: srp
Title: 10
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1127/ML112730393.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 1
Section ID: 1.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
Revision 2 – December 2011 SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC's regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC's regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. 1. There are no specific SRP acceptance criteria associated with these general requirements. 2. For regulatory considerations, acceptance is based on addressing the regulatory requirements as discussed within this FSAR section or within the referenced FSAR section. The SRP acceptance criteria associated with the referenced section will be reviewed within the context of that review. 3. For performance of new safety features, the information is sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that (1) these new safety features will perform as predicted in the applicant's FSAR, (2) the effects of system interactions are acceptable, and (3) the applicant provides sufficient data to validate analytical codes. The design qualification testing requirements may be met with either separate effects or integral system tests; prototype tests; or a combination of tests, analyses, and operating experience. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant=s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in