Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dfad5166-86ba-4d57-a49c-4a918bb0780d
Document Type: srp
Title: and Section 2.4.9, as described in the corresponding SRP sections.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0701/ML070100647.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.4.7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
f should review the corresponding sections of the ESP and DC FSER to ensure that any early site permit conditions, restrictions to the DC, or COL action items identified in the FSERs are appropriately handled in the COL application. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The review should document the staff’s evaluation of site characteristics with regard to the relevant regulatory criteria. The evaluation should support the staff’s conclusions as to whether the regulations are met. The reviewer should state what was done to evaluate the applicant’s submittal. The staff’s evaluation may include verification that the applicant followed applicable regulatory guidance, performance of independent calculations, and/or validation that the appropriate assumptions were made. The reviewer may state that certain information provided by the applicant was not considered essential to the staff’s review and was not reviewed by the staff. While the reviewer may summarize or quote the information offered by the applicant in support of its application, the reviewer should clearly articulate the bases for the staff’s conclusions. The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. Construction Permit, Operating License, and Combined License Reviews The following statements should be preceded by a summary of the site characteristics and parameters used for the plant: As set forth above, the applicant has presented and substantiated information relative to the local intense precipitation, flooding causal mechanisms, and the controlling flooding mechanism important to the design and siting of this plant. The staff has reviewed the available information provided and, for the reasons given above, concludes that the identification and consideration of the