Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: efac696f-0049-4b65-b562-4a813c1d817c
Document Type: srp
Title: STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL SYSTEM (BWR)
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070538.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.3.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
eviewer verifies that the valves will be covered by adequate reliability assurance requirements under a Reliability Assurance Program.41 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.42 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 9.3.5-10 The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided and his review supports conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The standby liquid control system (SLCS) includes storage tanks, pumps, valves, and piping to the point where the system connects to the reactor coolant boundary. The SLCS, which is provided for BWRs only, provides reactivity control in the event the control rods cannot be inserted. The basis for acceptance in the staff review of the standby liquid control system is the conformance of the applicant's design and design criteria to the Commission's regulations as set forth in the General Design Criteria, 10 CFR 50.62 and to the positions of applicable regulatory guides, staff technical 43 positions, and industry standards. The staff concludes that the design of the standby liquid control system is acceptable and conforms to the requirements of General Design Criteria 2, 26, and 27, and 10 CFR 50.62 with respect to seismic design, reactivity control system redundancy, and 44 reactivity control system capability. This conclusion is based on the following: 1. The applicant has met the