Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: fac9de93-e631-4c47-9034-708e2dcf2790
Document Type: srp
Title: of the ABWR FSER which includes a review of
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070372.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.5.1.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
missile protection features for the SSC whose failure could prevent the safe shutdown of the facility or result in significant uncontrolled release of radioactivity (see PI-24288). 27. Current PRB names and Editorial change made to reflect current PRB names abbreviations. and responsibilities for this SRP section. SRP Draft Section 3.5.1.2 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 3.5.1.2-10 28. Editorial. Deleted the word "procedure" which is redundant for this usage. 29. Editorial. Substituted the acronym SSC for structures, systems, or components as is consistent with the remainder of the section. 30. Editorial. Use of the term "safety-related SSC" was replaced with broader term "SSC important to safety." Use of the term "SSC important to safety" is consistent with GDC 4 and with the terminology used in the remainder of the section to identify those SSC that have a safety concern involving missile protection. 31. Editorial. Substituted the acronym SSC for structures, systems, or components as is consistent with the remainder of the section. 32. Editorial, adding a sentence A sentence was added to the second to last paragraph consistent with and supporting of the Review Procedures to discuss the review existing Acceptance Criteria and performed to verify that the degree of protection is resolution of PI-24290. adequate. The six methods of protection are consistent with the NRC staff reviews documented in sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.1.2 of the ABWR FSER (see PI- 24290) and are consistent with the existing Acceptance Criteria and Evaluation Findings. 33. Integrated Impact #535 A review procedure was added to address controls provided for unsecured maintenance equipment inside containment, including equipment required for maintenance and equipment undergoing maintenance. The new review procedure is consistent with the staff guidance documented in section 3.5.1.2 of the ABWR FSER and addresses the issues