Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b4734a50-4d73-4532-b9ec-2c7890d55a94
Document Type: srp
Title: and are compared by the reviewer with those provided by the applicant.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070364.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
upervisors permit the reviewer to reach a decision on the acceptability of any exceptions posed by the applicant.63 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.64 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided to satisfy the requirements of this SRP section and that histhe evaluation is sufficiently complete and adequate to support 65 conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The staff concludes that the design of the control rod drive system is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 1, 2, 14, 26, 27, and 29, and 10 CFR Part 50, §50.55a. This conclusion is based on the following: 1. The applicant has met the requirement of GDC 1 and 10 CFR Part 50, §50.55a, with respect to designing components important to safety to quality standards commensurate DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 3.9.4-10 with the importance of the safety functions to be performed. The design procedures and criteria used for the control rod drive system are in conformance with the requirements of appropriate ANSI and ASME Codes. 2. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 2, 14, and 26 with respect to designing the control rod drive system to withstand effects of earthquakes and conditions of normal operation, including anticipated normal operational occurrences with adequate margins 66 to assure its reactivity control