Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: cd2cdc5c-0fee-4485-b7a0-4111e40ab8a8
Document Type: srp
Title: of the ABWR FSER.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070296.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d Impact #84. Clarified the Evaluation Findings discussion on SSCs that do not have to be designed to seismic Category I requirements so that the evaluation finding is consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.29 position C.2. Deleted the discussion on excluding electrical features as this point was already made in the first sentence and need not be duplicated here. Also moved the listing of SSCs not required to be designed to seismic Category I to the review procedures, this listing is not appropriate for the evaluation finding discussions. Moving this listing to the review procedures is consistent with the positions on SSCs that need not be designed to seismic Category I requirements contained in Regulatory Guide 1.29, Regulatory Guide 1.143 and the ABWR FSER. 63. Editorial. Deleted the phrase "structures, systems and components" and substituted the acronym SSCs. 64. Integrated Impact #83 and #84. Revised Evaluation Findings to note that the SSCs within the scope of this review are within the applicants' quality assurance program and are in compliance with GDC 1 and 61. 65. Integrated Impact #83. Added an Evaluation Finding indicating confirmation that seismic Category I items are within the scope of a quality assurance program in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. 66. Editorial. Deleted the phrase "structures, systems and components" and the parentheses around the acronym SSCs. SRP Draft Section 3.2.1 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 3.2.1-18 67. Integrated Impact #553. Added Regulatory Guide 1.151, "Instrument Sensing Lines" to the evaluation findings as appropriate guidance for those SSCs (instrument sensing lines can be considered a specific portion of the system) that are seismic Category I. 68. Editorial. This is an editorial change to delete the use of "our conclusion" which is redundant for the Evaluation Findings. Also the paragraph has been separated into two