Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a78c6fc8-c253-4d08-bf41-f8120025f067
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0701/ML070160661.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
th respect to ensuring a low velocity of approach of the water to minimize the potential for debris in the water being sucked against the screening. v. For plants that do not have both trash racks and strainers, the staff review is intended to ensure that the strainer is functionally equivalent to trash racks and screens. B. Regulatory Guide 1.82 Revision 3, provides guidelines for the acceptability of the design of PWR sump screens and BWR ECCS suction strainers. Additional guidance is found the BWROG URG (Ref. 5), the NEI GR (Ref. 3) and the NRC SE of the NEI GR (Ref. 4). 9. The primary review organization reviews performance evaluations for equipment (other than pumps) downstream of the strainers with regard to debris ingestion. Evaluations of core cooling in the presence of predicted debris loading are also reviewed. 10. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1.