Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a416cfea-d766-4e80-9d15-6ac4918475fa
Document Type: srp
Title: REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COMPONENT AND SUBSYSTEM DESIGN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070610167.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ropriate for a particular case. For each area of review specified in Subsection I of this SRP section, the review procedure is contained in the specified SRP section. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II, and in the specified SRP sections. 1. The Project Manager's (PM’s) role associated with SRP 5.4 is to manage the evaluation of all Areas of Review of this SRP. Elements of this role include planning, scheduling, coordinating, monitoring, and combining safety evaluation report (SER) inputs received from technical staff. The PM needs to obtain the technical review resources necessary to perform the work in each Area of Review in concert with the responsible technical review branch chief (BC). The PM also negotiates the schedules with the appropriate BCs for performing each of the reviews. The PM then monitors progress of the reviews to help identify potential schedule problems in time to take meaningful corrective action to prevent slippage of SER due dates. Once SER input is received from technical staff, the PM is to ensure that the regulatory requirements and framework are clearly articulated in the SER, and the review, conclusion, and its basis are also clear. 2. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items