Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b41776b4-3baa-48e2-8183-522a8ba8b076
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1218/ML12186A007.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ive procedures to which this SRP applies, including problem identification and resolution; maintenance of design features provided to minimize contamination; use of engineering controls and monitoring to minimize contamination; and maintaining records to facilitate decommissioning, will provide a level of assurance that operations will minimize, to the extent practicable, 8. Establishing a leakage control program for systems outside of containment that contain (or might contain) accident source term concentration of radioactive materials following an accident, that satisfies the requirement of 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xxvi) and provides a level of assurance that the health and safety of the plant workers and the public will be adequately protected. 9. The elements of the radiation protection program provided to address the regulations of 10 CFR Part 30, “Rules of General Applicability to Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material,” 10 CFR Part 40, “Domestic Licensing of Source Material,” and 10 CFR Part 70, “Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material,” pertaining to the receipt, storage and use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear material such as reactor fuel, sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors, ensure that adequate protection from exposure to radiation from these source will be provided for workers and members of the public. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. 1. The organizational position, functional