Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b486e8d3-c8b0-4990-b7ec-211a3aae25c3
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT FUNCTIONAL DESIGN
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070456.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d integrity of the containment. The review has included the applicant's proposed design bases for the containment building and internal structures, and associated structures and systems upon which the containment function depends, and the applicant's analysis of postulated accidents and operational occurrences which support the adequacy of the design bases. The basis for the staff's acceptance has been conformance of designs and design bases for the containment building, internal structures, and associated systems, components, and structures to the Commission's regulations as set forth in the general design criteria, and to applicable regulatory guides, branch technical positions, and industry codes and standards. (Special problems or exceptions that the staff takes to the design or functional capability of containment structures, systems, and components should be discussed.) To support the basis for the staff's acceptance of the containment system, the reviewer of the containment system should include in the staff's safety evaluation report, as necessary, the results of the reviews for the seven SRP sections above. The SER writeup should demonstrate conformance with the Commission regulations in the manner indicated. The staff concludes that the containment functional design is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 4, 16, and 50, 52 and 53 and 10 13 14 CFR 50.46. The conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should discuss 15 each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the requirements of (cite regulation) with respect to (state limits of review in relation to regulation) by (for each item that is applicable to the review, state how it was met and why acceptable with respect to regulation being discussed): a. meeting the regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide ________ or Guides; b. providing and meeting an alternative method to regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide