Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dcb2f212-a3db-4f18-9046-f78bb3a0107c
Document Type: srp
Title: and 11.3, addressing compliance with offsite dose requirements, effluent
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0707/ML070710397.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
st, and the process for initiating and documenting changes to the PCP and its supporting procedures. The basis for acceptance in the staff’s review is conformance of the applicant’s design, design criteria, design bases, and proposed PCP and TS for the SWMS, including the associated use of mobile processing equipment, to the regulations and regulatory guidance, as referenced above, as well as to branch technical positions and industry standards. 2. The applicant has met the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1406 with respect to providing a description of how facility design and procedures for operation will minimize, to the extent practicable, contamination of the facility and the environment; facilitate eventual decommissioning; and minimize, to the extent practicable, the generation of radioactive waste. 3. The applicant has met the requirements of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, GDC 60, 61, and 63, with respect to controlling releases of radioactive materials to the environment using available technology. The staff has considered the ability of the proposed SWMS and mobile processing equipment to meet the 11.4-20 Revision 3 - March 2007 demands of the plant resulting from anticipated operational occurrences and has concluded that the system capacity and design flexibility are adequate to meet the plant’s anticipated needs. The applicant has fulfilled the requirements of Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 with respect to meeting the ALARA criterion. The staff has considered the potential effectiveness of augmenting the proposed SWMS using items of reasonably demonstrated technology and has determined that further waste treatment will not effect reductions in cumulative population doses reasonably expected within an 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius of the reactor at a cost of less than $1000 per man-rem or man-thyroid-rem. 4. The staff has reviewed the applicant’s quality assurance provisions for the SWMS, the quality group classifications used for system