Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 643ab154-682e-480f-a57b-a5fd7390a34e
Document Type: srp
Title: REVIEW OF TRANSIENT AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS METHODS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0535/ML053550265.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.0.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
rganization submitting the evaluation model for review. Submittals that do not contain the required material should also be processed in accordance with NRC Office Instruction No. LIC-101, Revision 1, “Licence Amendment Review Procedures” (Ref. 3). The reviewers should document what material is missing from the submittal. This information should then be provided in the letter to the submitting organization so that the material can be revised to meet acceptance review requirements for any future submittals. After a successful completion of the acceptance review, a detailed review of the code documentation may proceed. 3. Detailed Review a. Documentation The reviewers should review the documentation to determine if (i) all documentation listed in Section II.1 above has been provided, (ii) the evaluation model overview provides an accurate roadmap of the evaluation model documentation, (iii) all documentation is accurate, complete, and consistent and, (iv) all symbols and nomenclature have been defined and consistently used. The reviewers should confirm that the theory manual is a self-contained document and that it describes the field equations, closure relationships, numerical solution techniques, and simplifications and approximations (including limitations) inherent in the chosen field equations and numerical methods. The reviewers should also confirm that the theory manual identifies the pedigree or origin of closure relationships used in the code and the limits of applicability for all models in the code. 15.0.2-8 Initial Issuance - December 2005 The reviewers should confirm that the user manual provides guidance for selecting or calculating all input parameters and code options. The guidance must be clear and unambiguous. As a result of the code development or review process many code options may be determined to be inappropriate for specific licensing calculations. The reviewers should confirm that the guidance in the manual specifies the required and