Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e1c5261f-4ef6-4478-8cf0-015611057574
Document Type: srp
Title: and 9.3.2, “Process and Post-accident Sampling Systems.”  The review addresses
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15029A039.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
design and resulting effects on the development of the radioactive gaseous effluent source terms. The staff’s evaluation and conclusion of the acceptability of the augmented programmatic elements is addressed in Safety Evaluation Report (SER) Section 13.4, “Operational Programs,” and relevant requirements and guidance identified in this SER section for the systems and components identified in the supplemental or new programmatic elements. 2. For new reactor license applications submitted under 10 CFR 52.47(a)(8) and 52.79(a) (17) and (20), the applicant is required to (1) address the proposed technical resolution of unresolved safety issues and medium- and high-priority GSIs that are identified in the version of NUREG-0933 current on the date 6 months before the submission of the application and that are technically relevant to the design; (2) demonstrate how the operating experience insights have been incorporated into the plant design; and (3) 11.3-24 Revision 4 – January 2016 provide information necessary to demonstrate compliance with the technically relevant portions of the TMI requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.34(f), except paragraphs (f)(1)(xii), (f)(2)(ix), and (f)(3)(v), as referenced in 10 CFR 52.47(a)(21), 10 CFR 52.47(a)(22), and 10 CFR 52.47(a)(8), respectively. With respect to NUREG-0933, TMI Action Plan Items, Task III.D (Radiation Protection) and Task III.D.2 (Public Radiation Protection Improvement), the applicant should describe design features of the GWMS that are used to control and reduce potential exposures to offsite populations following an accident. With respect to GSIs, the applicant should present an evaluation of the issues listed in NUREG-0933 and, depending upon their applicability to the design, present information that demonstrates the implementation of acceptance criteria. These cross-cutting review areas should be addressed by the reviewer for each technical subsection and relevant conclusions should be documented in the