Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e0ef7b2e-a79b-4258-bb33-2ac349234104
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATING AND MAINTENANCEEMERGENCY OPERATING  PROCEDURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070646.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ts and transients, (assistance from other technical review branches required), (5) evaluate the adequacy of the applicant's program to develop guidelines from the analysis of accidents and transients, (6) test the guidelines against scenarios, including multiple failures, and (7) evaluate the information and control needs of the operators to execute the instructions of the guidelines. NUREG-0711 provides guidance on analyses appropriate for human-system interaction requirements. (Refer to Chapter 18 for additional information.)53 The P-SWG review will consider the adequacy of the methods of presentation of the technical information asin the EOPs to ensure that they are complete, accurate, consistent and easy to DRAFT Rev. 0 - April 1996 13.5.2.1-8 understand and follow for the intended users of the EOPs (e.g., control room operators, shift 54 supervisors, and auxiliary operators). Review the P-SWG by evaluating the applicant's methods for meeting the overall writer's guide objectives stated in NUREG-0899 and objectives of NUREG-0711, Chapter 9, Element 8 - Procedure Development , and criteria described in 55 Appendix B of NUREG-1358, Supplement 1. Appendix A provides guidance to assist the 56 reviewer in making this evaluation. This guidance is not to be used as strict criteria, but is to be use as an aid in the overall evaluation of the P-SWG. Because strict criteria do not exist for the human factors evaluation, the reviewer must make a professional judgment regarding the adequacy of the applicant's methods as described in the P-SWG. Review the V/V V&V and training programs by comparing the program descriptions with the objectives of NUREG-0899 and NUREG-0711.57 The level of effort for these PGP reviews will vary significantly. For example, the effort 58 necessary to review the P-STG will vary depending on the number, complexity and significance of the plant-specific deviations from the approved generic technical guidelines. If the review of the PGP does not