Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: bb233b69-c637-41e8-9774-95be0cc8b117
Document Type: srp
Title: STATION SERVICE WATER SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550056.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
r reactor shutdown and for loss-of-coolant accidents, including operation of portions of the protection system and transfer between normal and emergency power sources. By designing the SWS for testing to detect degradation in performance or in the system pressure boundary, GDC 46 assures that the SWS will function reliably to provide decay heat removal and essential cooling for safety-related equipment. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these specific acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives to the SRP criteria provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. The procedures set forth below determine during the construction permit application review whether the design criteria and bases and the preliminary design in the preliminary SAR meet the acceptance criteria of subsection II of this SRP section. For review of operating license applications, the review procedures and acceptance criteria verify whether the initial design criteria and bases are implemented appropriately in the final design as in the final SAR. Upon request from the primary reviewer, the coordinating reviewers provide input for the areas of review stated in subsection I of this SRP section. The primary reviewer uses such input as required to complete this review procedure. For the various SWS designs there will be variations in system requirements. For purposes of this SRP section, a typical system is assumed to have fully redundant systems, each with identical essential (safety features) and nonessential (used for normal operation) portions. For variations from the typical arrangement, the reviewer adjusts the review procedures; however, the system design must meet the