Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c47cf2bd-7ad6-48e2-a865-479dac62c162
Document Type: srp
Title: LIGHT LOAD-HANDLING SYSTEM (RELATED
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350539.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.1.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ng points, stability, and handling speeds, are compared with the performance specifications to determine the compatibility of the design with load handling and movement requirements. The reviewer uses the requirements of codes and standards and, if required, performs an independent analysis to determine acceptability of the system. b. The instrumentation and control system, including the limit and safety devices provided for automatic and manual operation for both normal and emergency conditions, that are required to operate to maintain safety in the event of a failure of the system, are reviewed. The results of failure modes and effects analyses are used by the reviewer to determine that the control system adequately limits loads or limits load movement, assuming a single failure, to prevent damaging the fuel to the extent that a release of radioactivity or a criticality accident could occur. c. The description of operating and test procedures presented in the SAR is reviewed to determine that load proof-testing, design-rated load testing, nondestructive testing, preventive checks, and attachment of the load assures reliable load handling operations. 4. The information presented in the SAR for the light load handling equipment, including the equipment storage areas, is reviewed to determine that a seismic event cannot result in damage to spent fuel or essential equipment. 9.1.4-4 Rev. 2 - July 1981 5. The fuel transfer carriage design is reviewed to determine the adequacy of the means provided to prevent damage to fuel assemblies especially during the time it receives or transfers the fuel assemblies to other LLHS equipment. 6. The maximum potential kinetic energy capable of being developed by any load handled above stored spent fuel, if dropped, is not to exceed the kinetic energy of one fuel assembly and its associated handling tool when dropped from the height at which it is normally handled above the spent fuel pool storage racks. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The