Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c23d52ec-d83f-4468-b35e-e8c97fdf2f09
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070461.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
llowed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.113 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The information provided and the CSBSCSB review should support concluding statements 114 similar to the following, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report (SER):115 The staff concludes that the containment isolation system functional design is 116 acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 1, 2, 4, 16, 54, 55, 56, and 57, Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, the additional TMI-related requirements 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xiv) and (xv), and the station blackout requirements of 117 118 10 CFR 50.63(a)(2). The conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should 119 discuss each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the requirements of (cite regulation) with respect to (state limits of review in relation to regulation) by (for each item that is applicable to DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 6.2.4-18 the review state how it was met and why acceptable with respect to the regulation being discussed): a. meeting the regulatory positions in NUREG __________ and/or Regulatory Guide(s) _____; b. providing and meeting an alternative method to regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide _____, that the staff has reviewed and found to be acceptable; c. meeting the regulatory position in BTP ________; d. using calculational methods for (state what was evaluated) that have been previously reviewed by the staff and found acceptable; the staff has reviewed the impact