Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6b7eddf4-f7ce-4821-9f11-e37070221e57
Document Type: srp
Title: DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1613/ML16133A418.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
es for Seismic Category I buried piping are reviewed for accordance with the acceptance criteria of subsection II.2.J of this SRP section, including review of the procedures for considering the effect of fill settlement, including pipe profile and pipe stresses, and the differential movements at support points, penetrations, and anchors. For any procedures not adequately justified additional justification is requested from the applicant. K. Interaction of Other Piping with Seismic Category I Piping. The criteria for design of the interfaces between Seismic Category I and non-Seismic Category I piping are reviewed for compliance with the acceptance criteria of subsection II.2.K of this SRP section. L. Criteria for Damping. The criteria for accounting for damping in systems, components, equipment, and their supports are reviewed in accordance with the criteria in subsection II.2.H of this SRP section. 3. For a CP application review, the reviewer should verify that the applicant describes the analysis of the vibration of such reactor internal structures as those listed in subsection I.3 of this SRP section if designated as a prototype, limited prototype, or non- prototype design. The vibration analysis should consider adverse effects from possible vibration excitation mechanisms (FIV, AR, AIV and MIV). The methods and procedures for the analysis should be described. For an OL application review, the reviewer should verify that that the application includes a detailed dynamic analysis for a prototype, limited prototype, or non-prototype design for vibration prediction prior to the performance of preoperational and initial startup vibration tests. Acceptance of the analysis is based on the technical soundness of the analytical method and procedures and the degree of compliance with the acceptance criteria in Section II.3 of this SRP. In addition, the analysis should be verified by correlation with the test results. 4. For a CP application, the reviewer should verify that