Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e1c5261f-4ef6-4478-8cf0-015611057574
Document Type: srp
Title: and 9.3.2, “Process and Post-accident Sampling Systems.”  The review addresses
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15029A039.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ompliance with the EPA standards requires consideration of whether doses due to gaseous and liquid effluent releases and external radiation are additive or need to be addressed separately given actual exposure pathways. The location of offsite dose receptors and the determination of actual exposure pathways should be based on the results of a current land use census for the site. The reviewer should determine whether the applicant has applied site-specific information in assigning doses for all identified exposure pathways, or instead has assumed that all exposures occur at one location in bounding dose estimates, where doses from gaseous and liquid effluent releases and external radiation are summed up and compared to the EPA standards. In such instances, the applicant should provide a commitment to reassess compliance with the EPA standards, as implemented under 10 CFR 20.1301(e), by appropriately assigning doses with actual exposure pathways once site-specific information becomes available on their locations within the vicinity of the site. 13. For the review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the FSAR meets NRC regulations, guidance, and acceptance criteria. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure that these COL action items are addressed in a COL application, they should be added to FSAR Sections 1.8 and 1.9. For the review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP, other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report), or proposes other reactor technology. The staff will confirm that the applicant has properly incorporated the relevant information from the DC or that of