Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 9d63483b-6755-4ab1-bdfb-675160dd5454
Document Type: srp
Title: CONDENSATE STORAGE FACILITIES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070521.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.2.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ce and Maintenance Branch as part of their primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 9.5.1, 16.0, and 17.0, respectively.36 8. The review for technical specifications is coordinated and performed by the Technical Specifications Branch (TSB) as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 16.0.37 9. The review for quality assurance is coordinated and performed by the Quality Assurance and Maintenance Branch (HQMB) as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Chapter 17.38 10. For new plant applicants, the Condensate Storage Facilities may be included in the systematic assessment of shutdown risks as an alternate feature that can supply core cooling water in the event of a loss of normal decay heat removal during shutdown conditions. The Probabilistic Safety Assessment Branch (SPSB) coordinates and performs the shutdown risk assessment reviews as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 19.1 (Proposed).39 For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility under other SRP sections of other branches, the acceptance criteria and their methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP sections of the corresponding primary branch.40 II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptability of the design of the condensate storage facility, as described in the applicant's Safety Analysis Report (SAR), is based on specific general design criteria and regulatory guides. 1. For reactor systems where the condensate storage facility is an ultimate means of water supply for safe shutdown or accident mitigation, the CSF is acceptable if the integrated 41 facility design is in accordance with the following criteria: a. General Design Criterion 2, as related to the system being capable of withstanding the effects of earthquakes. Acceptance is based on meeting the 9.2.6-5 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 guidance of Regulatory Guide 1.29, Position C-1, if any portion of the system in deemed to be safety