Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 7d56ab5c-90b1-42b4-a509-857fbfd674db
Document Type: srp
Title: review.10
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070724.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.4.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ate of 1% per day for a period of 24 hours, at which time the leakage is assumed to terminate. Condenser leakage rates lower than 1% per day and shorter in duration than 24 hours will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Credit for condenser vacuum discharge isolation on high activity level in the steam, or credit for filtration of the condenser vacuum discharge, will also be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 13. The effects of radiological decay during holdup in the turbine and condensers are taken into account. 14. The atmospheric dispersion factors ( /Q values), breathing rates, and dose conversion factors are the same as those used in the calculation of doses from a loss-of-coolant accident (Ref. 3)under Appendix A of SRP Section 15.6.5.27 15.4.9-5 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 The above assumptions are used in conjunction with a branch-approved computer code such as TACT to compute the radiological consequences. The whole-body and thyroid doses presented by the applicant in the SAR and those calculated independently by the staff are compared with the acceptance criteria in subsection II. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.28 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided by the applicant and that the applicant's analysis and the staff's independent evaluation support conclusions of the following type, to be included in the AEBPERB staff's safety