Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 988a555f-fdfa-4452-829d-c06654bfbba5
Document Type: srp
Title: Initial Plant Test Program - Design Certification and New License Applicants
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070660618.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
. Ensure that the ITAAC reflect the resolutions of technically relevant USIs/GSIs, TMI items, and operating experience. 14.3-7 March 2007 12. Ensure that sufficient interfaces with other reviewers, as specified in these SRP sections, are accomplished to address all significant Tier 1 issues completely and comprehensively. Ensure that inputs from secondary reviewers, including those identified in this SRP section, are reflected appropriately in Tier 1. 13. For the review of an ESP application that contains ITAAC, the reviewer should use SRP Section 14.3.10 to perform the review. 14. For the review of a DC application, the staff reviews the applicants justification that compliance with interface requirements is verifiable through ITAAC and the method to be used for the verification. The staff also should identify necessary COL action items. 15. For the review of a COL application referencing a DC or an ESP with ITAAC, the staff confirms that the ITAAC within the DC or early site permit (ESP) are applied to the appropriate portions of the facility design. In addition, the staff should review site- specific ITAAC on portions of the facility outside the scope of the certified design. In general the scope of review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC-approved material, applications, and/or reports. 16. The licensing project manager reviews the ITAAC to verify that they encompass the complete facility or complete DC. 17. Implementation of the ITAAC program is inspected in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter IMC-2503, “Construction Inspection Program - ITAAC Inspections.” IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. For a DC application, each reviewer