Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 9c20ec9e-fd1b-4e50-a8af-e8785949754b
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY — REVIEW OF PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM DESIGNS –
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1414/ML14140A210.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ant Security Assessment Format and Content Guide,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. 17. Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM. “Technology Transfer Manuals”: SAND2001-2168, “Access Delay Technology, Volume 1,” SAND2000-2142, “Entry Control and Contraband Detection Systems,” SAND99-2388, “Interior Intrusion Detection,” SAND99-2389, “Video Assessment,” SAND99-2390, “Alarm Communication,” SAND99-2391, “Exterior Intrusion Detection,” SAND99-2392, “Protecting Secure Communications,” and SAND99-2486, “Explosives Protection.” 18. TN 5-1300, “Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosion,” Department of Defense, Washington, DC. (Also designated as Air Force ARF 08-22 and Navy NAVFAC P-2897.) 13.6.2-13 Revision 2 – June 2015 19. NIJ Standard 0108.01, “Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials,” National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. 20. UL 752, “Standard for Bullet-Resisting Equipment,” Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. The applicant may apply or describe and identify other references and technical guidance for the designs of physical security systems that apply technical approaches, methods, or technologies based on sound and fundamental principles of science and human factor engineering, and that provide defensible technical bases for the proposed equivalent or alternative designs for meeting the regulatory requirements within Section II. In general, the design of physical security systems is acceptable when the proposed design and specifications describe how the performance and prescriptive design criteria in 10 CFR 73.55 will be met. The NRC decides whether the design is acceptable based on how the design assures reliability and availability through defense-in-depth that accounts for potential system failures or malfunctions (i.e., through diversity, independence, and separation). Information pertaining to the reliability and availability of a system for