Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ef80f444-3259-4db1-b721-096a73435ff7
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070464.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
fied in Appendix J, to 30 months. The Commission approved this recommendation in its SRM dated July 21, 1993. Since no applicable regulation has been issued for this position, a partial exemption from Appendix J would be required for an applicant to utilize a 30 month interval for Type C testing.47 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.48 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided and that his the evaluation 49 supports conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The staff concludes that the containment leak testing program is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 52, 53, and 54; Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50; and 10 CFR Part 100. This conclusion is based on the following: [The reviewer should discuss each item of the regulations or related set of regulations as indicated.] 1. The applicant has met the requirements of (cite regulation) with respect to (state limits of review in relation to regulation) by (for each item that is applicable to the review state how it was met and why acceptable with respect to the regulation being discussed): a. Meeting the regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide(s) ___; b. Providing and meeting an alternative method to regulatory positions in Regulatory Guide _____, that the staff has reviewed and found to be acceptable; c. Meeting the regulatory