Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c544c383-46ca-4e10-8688-4fd295af8a61
Document Type: srp
Title: provide guidance in evaluating the source terms and doses from gaseous effluents
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1304/ML13044A644.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
riteria. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure that these COL action items are addressed in a COL application, they should be added to FSAR, Sections 1.8 and 11.2. For the review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP, other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report), or proposes other reactor technology. The staff will confirm that the applicant has properly incorporated the relevant information from the DC or that of another design into the COL application, addressed all COL action items associated with specific design aspects of SSCs (e.g., balance of plant topics not covered in the design) left to the COL applicant, and considerations driven by site-specific features. For reviews of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 and RG 1.215 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of the review under this section. For reviews of a COL application relying on a DC, 10 CFR 52.63 precludes the staff from imposing new requirements on DCs unless it is deemed necessary to bring the certification in compliance with NRC regulations, provide adequate protection of public health and safety, or preserve common defense and security. A DC has finality for issues resolved at the DC stage, and the staff can only make changes to this information if it meets one of the standards in 10 CFR 52.63. If a COL applicant seeks to make changes to information within the scope of a DC (as Tier 1, 2, or Tier 2* information), then it must also follow the appropriate change process in Section VIII of the DC rule. Accordingly, the reviewer should ensure that plant design features of the certified design are maintained in the COL application and that, if requested, the 10 CFR Part 52