Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ba7b8f31-872f-4ab8-bdf8-7be885afd4b6
Document Type: srp
Title: LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15029A032.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ria sections, as noted in explanations above. 11.2-45 Revision 5 – January 2016 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation findings section was revised by expanding the discussions on the results of the staff’s evaluation and conclusion of acceptability against cited regulations and guidance. The revisions address: 1. Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 61, as it relates to the consequence analyses conducted under SRP Section 11.2 using the guidance in BTP 11-6. 2. Using RG 1.143, compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 2 and 61, as they relate to acceptance criteria related to seismic, safety, and quality group classifications and quality assurance provisions for SSCs of the LWMS for liquids and liquid wastes produced during normal operation and AOOs. The acceptance criteria are revised to conform with 10 CFR Part 20 dose limits for members of the public and plant workers, given assumed locations in restricted areas for workers and unrestricted areas for members of the public. 3. Development of radioactive source terms using the guidance in RG 1.112, NUREG-0016, NUREG-0017, DC/COL-ISG-05 in using GALE86, and ANSI/ANS 18.1-1999 and whether specific adjustments are made in consideration of specific design and operating features of the proposed reactor design. 4. If applicable, proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the design and resulting effects on the development of associated radioactive liquid effluent source terms and compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 effluent concentration and dose limits and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives and ALARA provisions. 5. Confirmation that the approach used in an ESP application in developing effluent source terms, as a plant parameter envelope, is consistent with the identified type of reactor design and conservatively bounding over all expected radionuclides and releases. 6. Confirmation that the applicant has committed, given SRP Sections 11.5, 13.4, and 13.5, to