Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 35e957d7-3290-494d-9eee-0bf2a413d598
Document Type: srp
Title: LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0636/ML063600412.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
TAP II Code). Compliance with the acceptance criterion given in SRP Acceptance Criteria Subsection 1.b concerning the cost-benefit analysis will be determined based on analyses performed by NRC staff, including population cumulative dose (person-Sv (person-rem)) calculations and cost-benefit studies. Regulatory Guide 1.110 describes methods for performing such cost-benefit analyses. 2. The review of the LWMS design capacity will encompass the following major areas: A. The system capability to process wastes in the event of a single major equipment item failure (e.g., outage of the primary means for processing liquid wastes). B. The system capability to accept additional wastes during operations which result in excessive liquid waste generation. C. The system capability to process wastes at design-basis fission product leakage levels (i.e., from 1 percent of the fuel producing power in a pressurized-water reactor (PWR), or in a BWR consistent with a noble gas release rate of 3.7 megabecquerels per second per megawatt thermal (MBq/s per MWt) (100 microcuries (μCi)/s per MWt) measured after a 30-minute delay. D. Types and characteristics of filtration systems, ion-exchange resins, and adsorbent media to treat process and effluent streams, with removal efficiencies, decontamination factors, and holdup times, for example, meeting or exceeding the performance of NRC generic guidance (NUREG-0016 or NUREG-0017), standard DCs, or topical reports, taking into account the expected physical, chemical, and radiological properties of liquid process and effluent streams. 11.2-12 Revision 3 - March 2007 The average input flows are compared with the design flows to determine the fraction of time individual subsystems must be online to process normal waste inputs. The review includes the operational flexibility designed into the system (i.e., cross-connections between subsystems, redundant or reserve processing equipment, and reserve storage capacity). Based on the usage factors and