Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6b7eddf4-f7ce-4821-9f11-e37070221e57
Document Type: srp
Title: DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1613/ML16133A418.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
thin allowable limits of the applicable code and 3.9.2-36 Revision 4 – March 2017 deformations are within the limits set to ensure the ability of reactor internal structures to perform needed safety functions. The reviewer verifies that an acceptable hydraulic analysis has been performed. 6. The reviewer will evaluate the applicant’s program to implement the preoperational and initial startup test procedure to correlate the test measurements with the analytically/computationally predicted flow-induced dynamic response of the reactor internals. The applicant's provisions in this area should specify submittal of a timely report of the monitoring results. The applicant’s provisions should ensure that the report will summarize the analyses and test results for review of the compatibility of the results from tests and analyses, the consistency between mathematical models for different loadings, and the validity of the interpretation of the test and analysis results. 7. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the FSAR meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also determine whether the identified COL action items are adequate and sufficient. Where the reviewer identifies additional COL action items, these COL action items should be included in the DC FSAR or DCD. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a certified design, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). The NRC staff reviewer should determine whether the COL applicant has adequately responded to each COL action item, and supplemented the DC application or other referenced NRC approvals to address any