Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 3d0785e0-b95c-4d8c-b957-005cf3cd61c6
Document Type: esrp
Title: TRANSMISSION CORRIDORS AND OFFSITE AREAS
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.1.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
cts. • The impact is adverse, but can be mitigated by specific design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has identified and determined to be practical. For these cases, the reviewer should consult with the EPM and the reviewer for ESRP 9.4.3 for verification that the reviewer’s identified modifications are practical and will lead to an improvement in the benefit-cost balance. The reviewer should prepare a list of verified modifications and measures and controls to limit the corresponding impact. These lists should be provided to the reviewer for ESRP 4.6. • The impact is adverse, cannot be successfully mitigated, and is of such magnitude that it should be avoided. When impacts of this nature are identified, the reviewer should inform the reviewer for ESRP 9.4.3 that an analysis and evaluation of alternative designs or procedures is required. The reviewer should participate in any such analysis and evaluation of alternatives that would avoid the impact and that could be considered practical. If no such alternatives can be identified, the reviewer should provide this information to the reviewer for ESRP 10.1. The following general criteria be considered by the reviewer: ` If a redress plan has not been approved in advance, in the case of a CP, OL, early site permit, or COL application withdrawal or termination request, the applicant should provide a plan for redress and the mitigation of adverse impacts. The reviewer should assess this plan with the objective of determining either that it is adequate as proposed or that changes will be needed. Technical feasibility and the benefit-cost of any identified changes should also be considered. Costly actions that would yield only minor environmental benefits should be avoided. ` If construction of the corridors or offsite areas will cause only small changes in the land use of publicly dedicated areas; urban development; land meeting the statutory definition of prime or unique, having a relative value rating