Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 06ca0ca1-d4e9-478b-ad5d-c52597a36b46
Document Type: srp
Title: COOLANT SOURCE TERMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1305/ML13058A173.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
active source terms. The staff’s evaluation and conclusion of the acceptability of the augmented programmatic elements are addressed in SER Section 13.4, “Operational Programs,” and relevant SER sections for the systems and components identified in the supplemental or new programmatic elements. 5. For an ESP application, the staff confirms that the applicant has provided enough information for the staff to conclude that the application provides a bounding assessment in demonstrating the capability to comply with the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives. The staff’s evaluation confirmed that physical attributes of the site that could affect the design basis of SSCs (in the context of this SRP section and SRP Sections 11.2 and 11.3) that are important to safety or risk significant are reflected in the site characteristics, design parameters, and conditions stipulated in the ESP, including COL action items. The staff’s finding are presented in SER Sections 11.2 and 11.3 in addressing the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 for effluent concentration limits and dose limits for members of the public, and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives and ALARA provisions. The staff confirms that the approach used by the applicant in developing the 11.1-16 Draft Revision 4 –August 2014 annual average liquid and gaseous effluent source terms is consistent with the identified type of reactor design, as presented in the DC or other selected reactor technology. For a coolant source term based on two or more types of reactor designs, the staff confirmed that the source term, as a plant parameter envelope, is consistent with that presented in the DC or other selected reactor technology and conservatively bounding over all expected radionuclides and estimated releases. 6. For DC and COL reviews, the findings will also summarize the staff’s evaluation of requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and