Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 496a8650-7c3b-4111-a527-d49e2f61ae5c
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY—COMBINED LICENSE AND OPERATING REACTORS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1729/ML17291B265.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
xt in establishing the licensing bases for meeting performance and prescriptive regulatory requirements. Contradictions or inconsistencies between {bracketed} text and generic template text, or within the security plans (i.e., between the PSP, T&QP, and SCP), should be identified and resolved by the applicant or licensee to clearly establish the bases for licensing. The Staff’s Specific Physical Security Review The staff will review the applicant’s licensing bases related to a requested licensing action and confirm whether they are acceptable if the applicant provides sufficient data and information in the docketed license application (e.g., security plans, FSAR, and other licensing-basis documents) to meet each of the following requirements: 1. 10 CFR 73.1, “Purpose and Scope” A. Review of the descriptions of how a design and implementation of a physical protection system address the capabilities of protecting the nuclear power plant against acts of radiological sabotage and preventing theft or diversion of special nuclear material. B. Review of the descriptions of potential radiological sabotage analyzed under 10 CFR 73.55 and their postulated credible bounding scenarios to confirm that 13.6.1-42 Revision 2 – August 2018 they meet the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 73.1(a)(1) for protection against radiological sabotage and that the detailed descriptions in the security plan that describe or specify this radiological sabotage is consistent to guidance on characteristics of the DBT adversary and capabilities specified in RG 5.69. C. Review confirms if licensee has incorporated RG 5.69 in whole and whether it is explicitly stated in the descriptions contained in the security plans. NRC guidance for inspections and guidance developed by industry for inspections are not Commission determined regulatory requirements for characteristics of the DBT and are not acceptance criteria for licensing. D. The requirements of 10 CFR 73.1(a)(2) through 73.1(a)(9) are not