Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 457a1532-95ad-4810-9c42-ca7251ab9478
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY HARDWARE – INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1009/ML100970568.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.12
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
criteria set forth in 10 CFR 73.54, “Protection of Digital Computer and Communication Systems and Networks.” 6. 10 CFR 52.47(b)(1), which requires that a DC application contain the proposed ITAAC that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, a plant that incorporates the DC has been built and will operate in conformity with the DC, the provisions of the AEA, and the NRC’s regulations. 7. 10 CFR 52.80(a), which requires that a COL application contain the proposed inspections, tests, and analyses, including those applicable to emergency planning, that the licensee shall perform, and the acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, the facility has been constructed and will operate in conformity with the COL, the provisions of the AEA, and the NRC’s 14.3.12-4 Revision 1 – May 2010 regulations. 8. 10 CFR 73.55, as it relates to the requirements for the design of a program to provide physical protection against radiological sabotage for licensed activities in nuclear power reactors. 9. 10 CFR 73.70(e), as it relates to documentation of all tests, inspections, and maintenance performed on physical barriers, intrusion alarms, communications equipment, and other security related equipment used pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 73. SRP Acceptance Criteria: Specific SRP acceptance criteria are described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance