Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 339b5072-d5b1-47d7-9002-e7b942ab753b
Document Type: srp
Title: II.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070311.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.5.1.3.8
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
sed, the justification provided is reviewed to assure ensure that such equations give results which are 32 comparable to those referenced above. 2. For the prediction of overall damage and response of the barrier, the reviewer verifies that the applicant has made a commitment to utilize the criteria delineated in subsection II.2 of this SRP section. If other criteria are selected, the applicant's justification is reviewed to assure ensure that the results obtained are at least as conservative as those 33 delineated in subsection II.2. If sufficient justification is not provided, additional information is requested from the applicant at the first stage of the review. 3. Refer to SRP Section 3.5.1.3 for additional information regarding the protection of structures, systems, and components from the effects of turbine missiles.34 For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.35 DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 3.5.3-6 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided to satisfy the requirements of this SRP section and concludes that his the evaluation is sufficiently complete and adequate to 36 support the following type of conclusive statement to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report: The staff concludes that the barrier design is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 2 and 4 with respect to the capabilities of the structures, shields,