Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 2e10133b-98b0-42f8-899f-1047931ce724
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATING AND EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0701/ML070100635.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ecifically, audit the four parts of the PGP to determine if there are any major deficiencies in the EOP program that warrant postponing operator training. If major deficiencies are found, identify the additional information necessary to conduct the complete PGP review so the applicant can be notified prior to the initiation of training. Review the PGPs to determine if the applicant's program meets the requirements of Generic Letter 82-33. The review consists of the evaluation of the four parts of the PGP: the P-STGs, the P-SWG, the description of the program for V&V, and the description of the training program necessary to support the conclusions described in Subsection IV below. To support this review, Appendix A provides additional review guidance. Review the P-STGs to determine whether acceptable analyses of accidents and transients and development of technical guidelines for operator actions applicable to the plant have been completed, and whether an acceptable process for identifying operator information and control needs has been described. The Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (HFE PRM), as described in NUREG-0711, provides additional guidance on reviewing applicant procedure development programs. It is expected that most applicants will reference generic technical guidelines. For an applicant using approved generic technical guidelines as the basis for its P-STGs, the major portion of the review of the technical guidelines has been accomplished generically. Staff SERs approving the use of each of the four owners groups' generic technical guidelines have been published (and may be supplemented as guidelines are revised). The review of this type of P-STGs should focus on the process described for converting generic technical guidelines to plant-specific procedures to ensure that the safety-significant deviations from the generic guidelines are controlled. The evaluation should include the technical adequacy of the identified plant-specific