Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 5283dfb7-caf8-4f93-8676-40a01932c369
Document Type: esrp
Title: HISTORIC PROPERTIES
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.1.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
this review, the staff concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts. ` The impact is adverse, but can be mitigated by specific design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has identified and determined to be practical. For these cases, the reviewer should consult with the Environmental Project Manager (EPM) and the reviewers for ESRP 9.4 for verification that the reviewer’s evaluations are practical and will lead to an improvement in the benefit-cost balance. The reviewer should prepare lists of verified modifications and identified measures and controls to limit the corresponding impact. These lists will be provided to the reviewer for ESRP 4.6.2. NUREG-1555 4.1.3-6 October 1999 ` The impact is adverse, cannot be successfully mitigated, and is of such magnitude that it should be avoided. When impacts of this nature are identified, the reviewer should inform the reviewers for ESRP 9.4 that an analysis and evaluation of alternative designs or procedures is required. The reviewer should participate in any such analysis and evaluation of alternatives that would avoid the impact and that could be considered practical. If no such alternatives can be identified, the reviewer should be responsible for providing this information to the reviewer for ESRP 10.1. The reviewer should evaluate proposed construction activities to ensure that the applicant is committed to using currently acceptable practices to minimize impacts. In consultation with the SHPO, the reviewer should use 36 CFR 800 to evaluate the potential impacts on properties in or are eligible for inclusion in the National Register. V. IMPLEMENTATION The method described herein will be used by the staff in evaluating conformance with the Commission’s regulations, except in those cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative for complying with specified portions of the regulations. VI. REFERENCES 36 CFR 800, “Protection of Historic Properties.” 43 CFR 10, “Native