Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: bc7e4c14-0eaa-4591-a506-23d7893f8a00
Document Type: srp
Title: as establishing acceptable guidance for meeting the requirements of this criterion.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070498.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 8
Section ID: 8.3.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
eparate seismic Category I structures, are not shared between units, and the applicant has met the positions of Regulatory Guide 1.32, Position C.2.a, and Regulatory Guide 1.81, Positions C.2 and C.3. 4. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 17, "Electric Power Systems," with respect to the onsite Class 1E ac power system's (a) capacity and capability to permit functioning of structures, systems, and components important to safety; (b) the independence and redundancy to perform their safety function assuming a single failure; and (c) provisions to minimize the probability of losing electric power from any of the remaining supplies as a result of, or coincident with, the loss of power generated by the nuclear power unit or the loss of power from the transmission network. Acceptability was based on the applicant meeting the positions of Regulatory Guides 1.6, 1.9, 1.32, 1.75, and 1.108, 1.153, 1.155, and 150 NUREG/CR-0660. 5. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 18, "Inspection and Testing of Electric Power Systems," with respect to the onsite Class 1E ac power system. The 8.3.1-27 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 ac power system is designed to be testable during operation of the nuclear power 151 generating station as well as during those intervals when the station is shut down. This meets the positions of Regulatory Guide 1.118. 6. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 50, "Containment Design Bases," with respect to penetrations containing circuits of the safety and nonsafety ac power system. Containment electric penetrations have been designed to accommodate, without exceeding their design leakage rate, the calculated pressure and temperature conditions resulting from any loss-of-coolant accident concurrent with the maximum short-circuit current versus time condition that could occur given single random failures of circuit overload protective devices. This meets the positions of 152 Regulatory Guide 1.63. 7. The applicant has met the requirements