Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: f48fc6fe-7c52-4612-b75c-034cedcfeb13
Document Type: srp
Title: STEEL CONTAINMENT
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070325.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
' evaluations that interface with structural engineering 18 aspects of the review, as follows: A. Determination of structures which are subject to a quality assurance program in 19 accordance with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 is performed by the Mechanical Engineering Branch (MEB)(EMEB) as part of its primary review 20 responsibility for SRP Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. SEBECGB will perform its review of 21 safety-related structures on that basis. B. Determination of pressure loads from high-energy lines located in safety-related structures other than containment is performed by the Auxiliary Systems Branch (ASB)Plant Systems Branch (SPLB) as part of its primary described review 22 responsibility for SRP Section 3.6.1. SEBECGB accepts the loads thus generated, as 23 approved by the ASBSPLB, to be included in the load combination equations of this 24 SRP section. C. Determination of loads generated due to pressure under accident conditions is performed by the Containment Systems Branch CSBContainment Systems and Severe Accident Branch (SCSB) as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 6.2.1. 25 DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 3.8.2-8 SEBECGB accepts the loads thus generated, as approved by the CSBSCSB, to be 26 27 included in the load combinations in this SRP section. E. The review for quality assurance is coordinated and performed by the Quality Assurance Branch Quality Assurance and Maintenance Branch (HQMB) as part of its primary 28 review responsibility for SRP SectionChapter 17.0.29 F. Corrosion and corrosion protection procedures are reviewed by the Chemical Engineering BranchMaterials and Chemical Engineering Branch (EMCB). General 30 Design Criterion 4 allows the exclusion of dynamic effects of pipe ruptures if analyses (i.e., leak-before-break analyses) demonstrate the probability of rupture is extremely low. For containment design, the applicability of these analyses is limited to localized effects only. The EMCB performs a