Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 00049a4f-6345-4415-8ec0-0e63d8d04990
Document Type: srp
Title: NUREG-0800
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070482.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
on report on the plant (Reference. 2118). The 37 SCSB has reviewed the design of the Cook ice condenser as reported in these documents and has found that it satisfies the acceptance criteria stated in subsection II of this SRP section. Any differences from the design reported in the Cook documents are evaluated. The SCSB determines that all design changes have been justified. 38 6.2.1.1.B-9 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 2. The SCSB reviews the analysis of the containment pressure and temperature response to postulated loss-of-coolant accidents. The SCSB has reviewed the LOTIC-1 code which is used to determine the containment pressure and temperature response, and has determined that the code is acceptable for containment analysis. The SCSB assures that 39 the LOTIC-1 code has been used and that the input assumptions to the code are conservative. Code revisions and improvements will also be considered. The SCSB reviews the analysis of the containment temperature and pressure response to postulated secondary system pipe ruptures. The NRC staff has reviewed the LOTIC-3 code and has determined that it is acceptable for the calculation of ice condenser 40 containment analysis for steam line break accidents. The SCSB assures that the 41 LOTIC-3 code has been used and that plant-sensitive input assumptions used in the analysis of the containment response are conservative. SCSB determines from the results of analyses of postulated loss-of-coolant accidents and secondary system pipe ruptures that the peak calculated containment pressure does not exceed the design pressure of the containment, for plants at the operating license stage of review. For plants at the construction permit stage of review, the SCSB will ascertain 42 from the results of analyses reported in the safety analysis report that the design pressure provides a margin of at least 20% above the maximum calculated pressure. Design certification applicants should also be reviewed against the 20% margin for