Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: bc47318d-f421-4335-b0d8-fa7f3bf3ae30
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070756.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 18
Section ID: 18.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
he analysis method and results. 3. Human-System Interface Design. Other design-related HSI documents may be reviewed, such as applicant-developed guidance documents, detailed trade studies, technology assessments, or test/experiment reports developed to support the HSI design. In addition, a variety of mockups, prototypes, or similar physical representations of the HSI design may be available for preliminary review of the design implementation. 4. Verification and Validation. The HFE issues tracking system, described in Section 2.4.4 of NUREG-0711, should be reviewed. The actual HSI design or a high-fidelity 63 prototype or simulator of the HSI should be available for the staff to examine in conjunction with the verification reviews. In addition, the staff may witness the integrated system validation evaluations. A documented description of the final HSI design that resulted from the HSI task support verification, HFE design verification, integrated system validation, and issue resolution verification activities should be reviewed. Finally, the installation of completed design in the plant should be reviewed, if time and resources permit it. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 (proposed), to verify that the design set forth in the standard safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.64 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS Acceptability of an individual area of review may be based on: A. Satisfying all associated review criteria. 65 B. Demonstrating by alternative means that all review criteria have been satisfied.