Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: f20d7632-9cee-44f2-9f15-d4c20fdd4f5e
Document Type: esrp
Title: THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 1
Section ID: 1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Primary—Appendix B Secondary—Appendix B I. AREAS OF REVIEW This environmental standard review plan (ESRP) directs the staff’s preparation of a brief introductory description of the proposed project and the site location and identification of the applicant. The scope of the review directed by this plan includes identifying the applicant and other owners, specifying the site location and major features of the project, and summarizing the staff’s procedures in conducting the environmental review. Review Interfaces The reviewer for this ESRP should provide the reviewers for other ESRPs with the location and official description of the site and plant. Data and Information Needs The following data or information should be obtained during the course of reviewing the environmental report (ER) and preparing input to the environmental impact statement (EIS): ` full names of all organizations (e.g., utilities, municipalities) sharing ownership of the proposed project (from the ER) NUREG-1555 1.1-2 October 1999 ` name of the organization designated as the applicant. This organization is the contact with NRC during the licensing process and will be responsible for construction and operation of the proposed project (from the ER) ` site location with respect to nearby towns and natural features (from the ER) ` number and type of reactors, highest anticipated gross thermal megawatt output, and net electrical output (from the ER) ` cooling system description (intake type, heat dissipation type, discharge type, source of cooling water) (from the ER) ` transmission system description (kilometers of new rights-of-way, new towers or conductors on existing rights-of-way) (from the ER) ` the nature of the proposed action and the constraints that are placed on the review because of the type of action ` proposed dates for start and completion of major activities (from the ER). II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The reviewer should ensure that the information provided by