Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: a4cb1b75-ec12-4a5f-9042-da6e8c17fe83
Document Type: srp
Title: and 7.7 of the safety analysis report (SAR).
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0525/ML052500502.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
. Note: the following finding applies only to systems involving computer-based components. Based on the review of software development plans and the inspections of the computer development process and design outputs, the Staff concludes that the computer systems meet the guidance of Reg. Guide 1.152. Therefore, the special characteristics of computer systems have been adequately addressed, and the Staff finds that the RTS satisfies the requirements of GDC 1 and 21. Based on the review of the applicant/licensee's defense-in-depth and diversity analysis, the Staff concludes that the RTS complies with the criteria for defense against common-mode failure in digital instrumentation and control systems. Therefore, the Staff finds that adequate diversity and defense against common-mode failure has been provided to satisfy these requirements of GDC 21 and 22, and Item II.Q of the Staff Requirements Memorandum on SECY-93-087. Rev. 4 — June 1997 SRP 7.2-7 Note: the following findings apply only to applications under 10 CFR 52. The RTS design appropriately addresses the applicable unresolved and generic safety issues. Therefore, the Staff finds that the RTS satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 52.47(a)(1)(iv). The review of the RTS examined the proposed inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC). Based upon the review and coordination with those having primary responsibility for ITAAC, the Staff concludes that if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, the plant will operate in accordance with the [design certification OR combined license]. Therefore, the Staff finds that the RTS satisfies the requirements of [10 CFR 52.47(a)(1)(vi) OR 10 CFR 52.79(c)]. The application for design certification does not seek certification for the following portions of the RTS [insert list]. Based upon review of the completed safety analysis, the Staff finds that the requirements for these portions of the design were sufficiently