Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: b4db5f60-e16c-422a-8800-a8e73e9dc81f
Document Type: esrp
Title: WATER-USE IMPACTS
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.2.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
P 9.4 reviewer for verification that the reviewer’s identified modifications are practical and will lead to an improvement in the benefit-cost balance. The reviewer should prepare a list of verified modifications and identified measures and controls to limit NUREG-1555 4.2.2-10 October 1999 the corresponding impact. These lists should be provided the reviewer for ESRP 4.6. ` The impact is adverse, cannot be successfully mitigated, and is of such magnitude that it should be avoided. When impacts of this nature are identified, the reviewer should inform the appropriate ESRP 9.4.1 reviewers that an analysis and evaluation of alternative designs or procedures is required. The reviewer should participate in any such analysis and evaluation of alternatives that would avoid the impact and that could be considered practical. If no such alternatives can be identified, the reviewer should be responsible for providing this information to the reviewer for ESRP 10.1. V. IMPLEMENTATION The method described herein will be used by the staff in evaluating conformance with the Commission’s regulations, except in those cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative for complying with specified portions of the regulations. VI. REFERENCES 33 CFR 322, “Permits for Structures and Work in or Affecting Navigable Waters of the United States.” 33 CFR 330, Appendix A, “Nationwide Permit and Conditions.” 40 CFR 6, Appendix A, “Statement of Procedures on Floodplain Management and Wetlands Protection.” 40 CFR 122, “EPA Administered Permit Programs: The NPDES Pollution Elimination System.” 40 CFR 149, “Sole Source Aquifers.” Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), as amended, 33 USC 1251 et seq. (also known as Clean Water Act). Jefferson County PUD#1 vs. Department of Ecology, 92-1911, Supreme Court of the United States, 510 U.S. 1037; 114 S. Ct. 677; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 795; 126 L. Ed. 2d 645; 62 U.S.L.W. 3450 (January 10, 1994). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory