Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 95c26d40-9fa0-4352-9b94-ac42af7ed16b
Document Type: srp
Title: is performed by EMEB.  The area of seismic
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070296.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.10
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
de 1.151. 47. Editorial. Deleted the phrase "structures, systems and components" and substituted the acronym SSCs. 48. Integrated Impact #83. Replaced existing sentence regarding the use of Regulatory Guide 1.29 and SSCs that should be within the scope of the Appendix B Quality Assurance Program with a sentence that is specifically consistent with the content of Regulatory Guide 1.29. Regulatory Guide 1.29 addresses seismic Category I SSCs, not all those plant features that are important to safety, which is a much broader category of SSCs than discussed in Regulatory Guide 1.29. 49. Current PRB names and Editorial change made to reflect current PRB names abbreviations. and responsibilities for SRP sections in Chapter 17. 50. Editorial. Deleted the phrase "structures, systems and components" and substituted the acronym SSCs. 51. Editorial. This listing of SSCs not required to be designed to seismic Category I was moved to the Review Procedures from the Evaluation Findings subsection. This level of detail listing specific systems is appropriate for a Review Procedure. Moving this information out of the Evaluation Findings does not alter the findings on this subject and is consistent with the positions on SSCs that need not be designed to seismic Category I requirements contained in Regulatory Guide 1.29, Regulatory Guide 1.143 and the ABWR FSER. (See item 57). SRP Draft Section 3.2.1 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 3.2.1-16 52. Integrated Impact #93 Moved an existing review procedure paragraph (formerly part of paragraph 3) to address the classification guidelines for existing BWR plants by referencing the reviewer to the guidelines contained in Appendix B of SRP Section 3.2.2. In addition, a new review procedure sentence was added to address taking credit for fission product retention in the main steam piping and the condenser as an alternative to an MSIVLCS for fission product control following