Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: d7254cf8-c034-434f-b7d8-6eb96075d286
Document Type: srp
Title: PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070439.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4.11
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
bility for SRP Sections 3.9.1 through 3.9.3. The MEB, also,EMEB also12 determines the acceptability of the seismic and quality group classifications for system components as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. D. The review for fire protection, technical specifications, and quality assurance are coordinated and performed by the Chemical Engineering BranchSPLB, Licensing 13 Guidance BranchTechnical Specifications Branch (TSB), and Quality Assurance 14 5.4.11-3 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 BranchQuality Assurance and Maintenance Branch (HQMB) as part of their primary 15 review responsibility for SRP Sections 9.5.1, 16.0, and 17.017.3 respectively. 16 For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility of other branches, the acceptance criteria necessary for the review and their methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP section of the corresponding primary branch.17 II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Since the pressurizer relief tank system is located inside containment, possibly in close proximity to essential systems and components, acceptance is based on a failure or malfunction of the system not having an adverse effect on equipment necessary to bring the plant to a safe shutdown condition, to prevent accidents or to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Therefore, the design of the pressurizer relief tank system is acceptable if the integrated system design is in accordance with the following criteria: 1. General Design Criterion 2 (GDC 2), as it relates to the protection of essential systems 18 from the effects of earthquakes. Acceptance is based on meeting the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.29, position C.2, with regard to the location of the tank in relation to other plant systems (the design of the tank system should be such that the plant safety-related systems would not be endangeredcontinue to perform their safety function in the event of a tank failure)