Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 2c839e4a-a342-4e25-9a7c-82d678a0f754
Document Type: srp
Title: NUREG-0800
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340657.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
the primary review responsibility of other branches, the acceptance criteria and their methods of application are contained in the SRP sections identified as the primary review responsibility of those branches. 6.2.1.l.C-2 Rev. 6 - August 1984 II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The acceptance criteria given below applies to the design and functional capability of BWR pressure-suppression type containments. CSB accepts the containment design if the relevant requirements of General Design Criterion 4, 16, 50, and 53 are complied with. The relevant requirements are as follow: 1. General Design Criterion 4, as it relates to the environmental and missile protection design, requires that structures, systems, and components important to safety be designed to accommodate the dynamic effects (e.g., effects of missiles, pipe whipping, and discharging fluids that may result from equipment failures) that may occur during normal plant operation or following a loss-of-coolant accident. 2. General Design Criteria 16 and 50, as they relate to the containment being designed with sufficient margin, require that the containment and its associated systems can accommodate, without exceeding the design leakage rate and with sufficient margin, the calculated pressure and temperature conditions resulting from any loss-of-coolant accident. 3. General Design Criterion 53 as it relates to the containment design capabilities provided to assure that the containment design permits periodic inspection, an appropriate surveillance program, and periodic testing at containment design pressure. Specific criterion or criteria that pertain to design and functional capability of BWR pressure-suppression type containments are indicated below: 1. In meeting the requirements of General Design Criteria 16 and 50 regarding the design margin for Mark I, II and III plants at the operating license stage of review, the peak calculated values of pressure and temperature for the drywell and wetwell should not exceed the