Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 667d1b37-702c-4e8d-93da-886dbb7a679f
Document Type: srp
Title: d.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070304.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.2.2.30
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
mically induced flood, hurricane, seiche, surge, PMP) and C.2 regarding alternatives to hardened protection of SSCs important to safety. (b) Meeting Regulatory Guide 1.102, positions C.1 regarding the type of flood protection provided and C.2 regarding provision of guidance in establishing shutdown technical specifications and emergency operating procedures related to flooding. 3.4.1-7 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 (c) Meeting Regulatory Guide 1.102 and GL 89-22 regarding design of roof drainage systems to accommodate maximum precipitation events.53 (cd) Using a The method used by the applicant for protection of SSC important to safety from flooding from external and internal causes that has been reviewed by the staff and found acceptable to protect SSCs important to safety from flooding by external and internal causes; and 54 (de) Protecting essential SSCs from external and internal flooding by locating the systems and components in individual flood-proof enclosures, providing exterior barriers (levees, seawalls, floodwalls, revetments, or breakwaters), or design of individual systems to maintain their safety function if they are flooded. For design certification reviews, the findings will also summarize, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other safety evaluation report sections, the staff’s evaluation of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), including design acceptance criteria (DAC), site interface requirements, and combined license action items that are relevant to this SRP section.55 V. IMPLEMENTATION The following is intended to provide guidance to applicants and licensees regarding the staff's plans for using this SRP section. This SRP section will be used by the staff when performing safety evaluations of license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR 50 or 10 CFR 52. Except in those 56 cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the