Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c8df76d2-a185-407d-a110-f0bc0fb638ad
Document Type: srp
Title: LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350102.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. The Accident Evaluation Branch (AEB) evaluates the radiological consequences of the release to the atmosphere of radioactive fission gases resulting from an unexpected and uncontrolled release of radioactive liquids as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 15.7.2. The reviews for technical specifications and quality assurance are coordinated and performed by the Licensing Guidance Branch and the Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) as part of their primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 16.0 and 17.0, respectively. For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility of other branches, the acceptance criteria necessary for the review and their methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP section of the corresponding primary branch. 11.2-2 Rev. 2 - July 1981 II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ETSB acceptance criteria are based on meeting the relevant requirements of the following regulations: 1. 10 CFR Part 20, § 20.106 as it relates to radioactivity in effluents to unrestricted areas. 2. 10 CFR Part 50, § 50.34a as it relates to sufficient design information being provided to demonstrate that design objectives for equipment necessary to control releases of radioactive effluents to the environment have been met. 3. General Design Criterion 60 as it relates to the radioactive waste manage- ment systems being designed to control releases of radicactive materials to the environment. 4. General Design Criterion 61 as it relates to radioactive waste systems to be designed to assure adequate safety under normal and postulated accident conditions. The relevant requirements of the Commission regulations identified above are met by using the regulatory positions contained in the following regulatory guides listed below. a. Regulatory Guide 1.110 as it relates to performing a cost-benefit analysis for reducing cumulative