Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 8d43c637-70e0-4eef-9161-2e383b5e7426
Document Type: srp
Title: STABILITY OF SLOPES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1331/ML13316C068.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.5.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
l phenomena that have been historically reported for the site and (xii) an evaluation of the site against applicable sections of the SRP acceptance criteria. 6. Applicable to a DC: 10 CFR 52.47(a)(1), “Contents of Applications; technical information”, a DC applicant is required to provide site parameters postulated for the design. 7. Applicable to a COL: 10 CFR 52.79(a)(iii), “Contents of Applications; technical information in final safety analysis report.” A Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) is required that includes the geological characteristics of the proposed site with consideration of the most severe of the natural phenomena that have been historically reported for the site and the surrounding area and with sufficient margin for the limited accuracy, and time in which the historical data have been accumulated. 8. 10 CFR Part 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," provides the criteria which guide the evaluation of the suitability of proposed sites for nuclear power and testing reactors. 9. 10 CFR 100.23, "Geologic and Seismic Criteria," provides the nature of the investigations required to obtain the geologic and seismic data necessary to determine site suitability and identify geologic and seismic factors required to be taken into account in the siting and design of nuclear power plants. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. Appropriate