Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 55e187c7-8e17-41ed-a88e-0205d1317fb6
Document Type: srp
Title: - 12.4
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1315/ML13151A475.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ost severe design bases accident, for electric equipment relied upon to remain functional during and following DBEs, including AOOs. 16. 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(vii) and Section II.B.2 of NUREG-0737, which requires the performance of radiation shielding design reviews to ensure the design permits adequate access to important areas and provides for protection of safety equipment from radiation, following an accident. 17. GDC 14 and GDC 30 as they relate to the ability to detect RCS pressure boundary leakage with radiation detectors. 18. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E “Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities,” Section VI.2(a), which requires radiation monitoring systems for reactor coolant radioactivity, containment radiation level, condenser air removal radiation level and process radiation monitor levels. 19. 10 CFR 52.47(a)(22) as it relates to ensuring that information necessary to demonstrate how operating experience insights have been incorporated into the plant design. 20. 10 CFR 50.34(b)(3), 10 CFR 52.47(a)(5), 10 CFR 52.79(a)(3) and 10 CFR 52.157(e) as they relate to identifying the kinds and quantities of radioactive materials expected to be produced in the operation and the means for controlling and limiting radioactive effluents and radiation exposures within the limits set forth in 10 CFR Part 20. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. The