Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e419c547-311b-4172-83fd-9dea7cfe5e9e
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATIONAL REVIEW
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070623.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
fferent phrases are used to identify the specific review responsibility. The Current SRP section talks about "plant operations review," "onsite organization" review, "plant staff review," "plant staff organization" reviews, and reviews by "an independent group located onsite." 12. Editorial revision See above comment. 13. Editorial revision It appears that the verb, examine, is modified. Therefore, independently is correct. 14. SRP-UDP format item Added "Review Interfaces" to AREAS OF REVIEW. 15. SRP-UDP format item A review interface is added with the HQMB review of the quality assurance programs because of the potential overlap of reviews and audits under this section and reviews and audits done as part of the quality assurance program. 16. SRP-UDP format item Added lead-in sentence to "Review Interfaces." 17. SRP-UDP format item An interface was added for the HHFB review of personnel qualifications because of the potential duplication of review under this SRP section. 18. SRP-UDP format item An interface was added for the TSB review of technical specifications because 10 CFR 50.36(c)(5) requires that the administrative controls be in the technical specifications. 19. Current PRB designation Changed PRB to HQMB. 20. Editorial revision Criteria are. SRP Draft Section 13.4 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description 13.4-11 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 21. Editorial revision Two additional acceptance have been included. Therefore, the format of the section is revised. 22. Editorial revision Appendix B is added as an acceptance criterion. The regulatory basis for requiring the reviews and audits is Appendix B rather than 50.40(B). Appendix B requires administrative controls. 50.40(b) requires that the applicant be technically qualified but does not address how the applicant organize. 23. Editorial revision The specific criteria have been moved to REVIEW PROCEDURES. 24. Editorial revision The technical specifications are required to