Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: d7254cf8-c034-434f-b7d8-6eb96075d286
Document Type: srp
Title: PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070439.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.4.11
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
plied missing article in the sentence. 23. SRP-UDP format item Converted 120 F to 49 C in accordance with Federal Standard 376B and noted the value in accordance with the required standard format. 24. SRP-UDP format item Added "Technical Rationale" and lead-in statement to describe safety benefits of conforming to applicable General Design Criteria. 25. SRP-UDP format item Added technical rationale for GDC 2. 26. SRP-UDP format item Added technical rationale for GDC 4. 27. Editorial Changed "assure" to "ensure." SRP Draft Section 5.4.11 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description 5.4.11-11 DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 28. Editorial Deleted three sentences. The first deleted sentence was misleading and not consistent with the rest of SRP Section 5.4.11. The second sentence of the second paragraph of AREAS OF REVIEW, Subsection I, states that the pressurizer relief tank is not safety related. This statement provides the basis for the ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, Subsection II, and EVALUATION FINDINGS, Subsection IV. Further, no guidance is offered elsewhere in SRP Section 5.4.11 concerning additional or alternative review actions if a determination is made that the pressurizer relief tank system is safety related. The second and third deleted sentences are not applicable if the first sentence is deleted. Also these sentences infer a definition of "safety related" that is not in accordance with the usually accepted meaning of this term. Subsection III.6, REVIEW PROCEDURES, appears to cover the concerns in the deleted text. 29. Editorial Changed "assure" to "ensure." 30. Current review branch abbreviation Changed "RSB" to "SRXB" to reflect current review branch abbreviation. 31. Editorial Changed "assure" to "ensure." 32. Editorial Deleted the phrase "not designed to seismic Category I, and which are" because it is ambiguous. The sentence, as now constructed, excludes from its scope those components that are designed as seismic Category 1. The