Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 35d16973-484d-41cb-9b6c-d66cae8072ca
Document Type: srp
Title: EMERGENCY PLANNING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0634/ML063410307.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ve; (c) the proposed alternative is unacceptable; or (d) no acceptable alternative has been proposed or identified. For deviations from the specific acceptance criteria, the reviewer should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternative to the SRP criteria provides an acceptable method of complying with the relevant rules or regulations of the Commission, or portions thereof, that underlie the corresponding SRP acceptance criteria. The reviewer should make an explicit finding in the appropriate sections of the SER of how the proposed alternative meets the applicable regulations. If any deficiencies remain in category (c) at the conclusion of the review, the reviewer should follow established NRC processes to attempt to resolve them. 12. Requests for additional information (RAIs) serve the purpose of enabling the staff to obtain all relevant information needed to make a decision on a licensing action request that is fully informed, technically correct, and legally defensible. RAIs are necessary when the information was not included in the initial submittal or is not contained in any other docketed correspondence. RAIs should be directly related to the applicable requirements related to the application, and consistent with the applicable codes, standards, regulatory guides, and/or the applicable Standard Review Plan (SRP) sections. RAIs should not be used as general information requests or as a means to encourage commitments from licensees. (See Section 4.3 of LIC-101, Rev. 3, “License Amendment Review Procedures.”) 18An application for a certified standard design under Subpart B of 10 CFR Part 52 deals solely with plant features and does not address offsite emergency plans. As such, FEMA review and consultation is not involved. 13.3-22 Revision 3 - March 2007 13. The detailed application of the acceptance criteria will in many instances require the exercise of judgement on the part of the reviewer. The reasonableness and adequacy of the