Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 94d86f6a-6c87-46a2-93df-ed4b0721bbdd
Document Type: srp
Title: is complete.
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070646.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.5.2.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
cant's PGP adequately accomplishes the above objectives, the reviewer should consider the following: 3.3.1 P-STG Development 3.3.1.1 Approved version of generic technical guidelines indicated. 3.3.1.2 A description of the process used to translate the generic technical guidelines into the P-STG. 3.3.2 Deviations and Additions 3.3.2.1 Identification of safety significant deviations from the NRC approved generic technical guidelines. Examples of deviations that should be considered are as follows: a. any modification to the mitigative strategy of the generic technical guidelines (e.g., for a Westinghouse plant, initial depressurizing the RCS following a steam generator tube rupture without first having conducted a limited cooldown in accordance with the guidelines to establish a margin to saturation). b. differences in equipment operating criteria (e.g., RCP trip criteria, SI injection termination criteria). c. differences in equipment operating characteristics (i.e., between the plant-specific equipment and that assumed in the generic analyses, such as SI that can be throttled vs. only on/off). d. identification of methods and equipment used to address the technical areas of the generic guidelines that are specified as "plant-specific." e. plant-specific setpoints or action levels that are calculated or determined in the manner other than specified in the generic technical guidelines. NOTE: Plant-specific setpoints (e.g., setpoints associated with automatic initiation of ECCS) called for by the generic guidelines need not be included in the P-STG submittal. 13.5.2.1-17 DRAFT Rev. 0 - April 1996 f. actions that are taken in addition to those specified in the generic guidelines and that affect the mitigative strategy. 1. differences that affect the equipment's ability to adequately provide the necessary mitigative function. 2. use of different instruments or control parameters than those specified in the generic technical guidelines or determining instrumentation and