Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 723c7d66-7b0b-443a-af9b-ec3026461a0c
Document Type: srp
Title: - 12.4
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1130/ML113081427.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
viewer will consider any changes in the design that might necessitate changes in operating procedures to accommodate a changed radiation zone or a different location of equipment. 5. The reviewer will determine whether the applicant has followed the guidance of the referenced RGs and industry standards, both by comparison of the applicant’s methods with the information in the guides and by the applicant’s reference to any such guides or to proposed alternatives. The reviewer will evaluate whether the alternatives are equivalent to, or improvements on, the methods cited in the referenced RGs. Otherwise, alternatives are likely to be disapproved. 6. Based on the review, the health physics staff may request additional information or request the applicant to reevaluate the radiation protection design features to meet the acceptance criteria of Subsection II of this SRP section. 7. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the FSAR meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 8. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient