Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 5a4eb38b-9f84-4cc6-ab01-0be817580f4c
Document Type: esrp
Title: INTAKE SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 5
Section ID: 5.3.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
the EIS: ` hydrodynamic description of the intake induced flow fields, including effects of ambient flow patterns. Tables or figures may be used. October 1999 5.3.1.1-7 NUREG-1555 ` a description and assessment of the analysis technique used ` the intake flow conditions that may result in severe impacts on aquatic biota ` a description and assessment of potential physical impacts. Evaluation of each identified impact will result in one of the following conclusions: • The impact is minor, and mitigation is not required. • The impact is adverse, but can be mitigated by specific design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has identified and determined to be practical. For these cases, the reviewer should consult with the project manager and the reviewer for ESRP 9.3.2 for verification that any proposed modifications are practical and will lead to an improvement in the benefit-cost balance. The reviewer should prepare a list of verified modifications, measures, and controls to limit the corresponding impact. These lists will be provided to the reviewer for ESRP 5.10. • The impact is adverse, cannot be successfully mitigated, and is of such magnitude that it should be avoided. When impacts of this nature are identified, the reviewer should inform the reviewer for ESRP 9.4 that an analysis and evaluation of alternative designs or procedures are required. The reviewer should participate in any such analysis and evaluation of alternatives that would avoid the impact and that could be considered practical. If no such alternatives can be identified, the reviewer should provide this information to the reviewer for ESRP 10.1. V. IMPLEMENTATION The method described herein will be used by the staff in evaluating conformance with the Commission’s regulations, except in those cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative for complying with specified portions of the regulations. VI. REFERENCES 33 CFR 322, “Permits for Structures and Work in or