Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 2cde5121-7267-482f-82a5-b36a0b9fc741
Document Type: srp
Title: ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE VENTILATION SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350029.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.4.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
proper functioning of the essential electric power system. Acceptance is based on meeting the guidance of item 2 under subsection A and item 1 under subsection C of the section on "Recommendations" of NUREG-CR/0660 (Ref. 9) relating to the protection of essential electrical components from failure due to the accumulation of dust and particulate materials. 5. General Design Criterion 60,.as related to the systems capability to suit- ably control release of gaseous radioactive effluents to the environment. Acceptance is based on meeting the guidance of Regulatory Guides 1.52 and 1.140, as related to design, testing, and maintenance criteria for atmo- sphere cleanup system, and normal ventilation exhaust system air filtration and adsorption units of light-water-cooled nuclear power plants, Position C.2 and Positions C.1 and C.2, respectively. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The procedures below are used during the construction permit (CP) review to determine that the design criteria and bases and the preliminary design as set forth in the preliminary safety analysis report meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. For the review of operating license (OL) applications, the procedures are utilized to verify that the initial design criteria and bases have been appropriately implemented in the final design as set forth in the final safety analysis report. The primary reviewer will coordinate this review with the other branches' areas of review as stated in subsection I. The primary reviewer obtains and uses such inputs as required to assure that this review procedure is complete. As a result of various ESFVS designs proposed by applicants, there will be vari- ations in system requirements. For the purpose of this SRP section, a typical system is assumed which has fully redundant subsystems, each having an iden- tical essential (safety features) portion. For cases where there are variations from this typical arrangement, the reviewer would adjust the review procedures