Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 63e0a936-4110-4a3f-94c4-d81f3a54165f
Document Type: srp
Title: TRAINING FOR NON-LICENSED PLANT STAFF
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070636.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.2.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
N18.1-1971, the requirements contained in ANSI N18.1-1971 are generally acceptable. Thus, until new staff positions endorsing a more recent version ANS 3.1 for this purpose are approved and issued, RG 1.8 is a more appropriate basis for evaluation of training of non-licensed plant staff than ANS 3.1. 6. Editorial Revised to reflect Areas of Review rather than application content guidance. 7. SRP-UDP format item Regulatory Guide 1.149 is currently under revision. This SRP section may be impacted by the revision. Therefore, this SRP should be reviewed for impact of when the revised RG 1.149 becomes available. 8. Editorial Revised to clarify that information regarding where experience training was obtained is reviewed. 9. Editorial Revised to cover both options delineated in the Commission's Policy statement on Engineering Expertise on Shift. 10. Editorial Revised to reflect Areas of Review rather than application content guidance. SRP Draft Section 13.2.2 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence Item Source Description 13.2.2-25 DRAFT Rev. 1 - April 1996 11. Integrated Impact No. 1362 Added requirement for emergency preparedness training for those who may assist in a radiological emergency. Modified list numbering to reflect correct sequence (global change for this section). 12. Editorial Revised to reflect Areas of Review rather than application content guidance. 13. Reference verification Revised to reflect current designation for this BTP. Also added identification by reference number at the point of its first citation. 14. Editorial Defined SRP. 15. Editorial Revised to reflect Areas of Review rather than application content guidance. 16. Editorial Revised to reflect Areas of Review rather than application content guidance. 17. Editorial, Incorporate PRB Revised to eliminate discussion of Comments specific types of SARs and instead discuss the expected SAR content in terms of the project stage since the COL process may not be amenable to a PSAR-FSAR