Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 35d16973-484d-41cb-9b6c-d66cae8072ca
Document Type: srp
Title: EMERGENCY PLANNING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0634/ML063410307.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
iately incorporates the new reactor(s) into the existing plan. This includes examining how the existing elements have been incorporated into the application, determining the acceptability of expanding the existing program to include one or more additional reactors, and determining the acceptability of the applicant’s identification of any impact on the adequacy of the existing emergency preparedness program. The reviewer should confirm that the applicant has appropriately identified whether any updates are required to existing emergency facilities and equipment, including the Alert and Notification System (ANS), in order to accommodate extension to the proposed new reactor. If appropriate, the reviewer should determine whether the applicant has addressed the exercise requirements for co-located licensees, in accordance with Section IV.F.2.c of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and the conduct of emergency preparedness activities and interactions discussed in Regulatory Guide 1.101, Rev. 5. When appropriate, the reviewer should also evaluate any proposed changes that the licensee submits that involve a decrease in effectiveness of the existing emergency preparedness program. 10. The reviewer should determine whether the application includes copies of the applicable letters of agreement or other certifications, required by 10 CFR 52.17, 10 CFR 52.79, or Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The reviewer should confirm that the agreement information is up-to-date when the application is submitted, and reflects use of the proposed site for possible construction of a new reactor (or reactors). The applicant should clarify any ambiguous or incomplete language in the letters of agreement or 17Another acceptable method of addressing this issue would be through the use of separate correspondence. Such correspondence might be appropriate, for example, in a case for which an existing letter of agreement is written in a way that is broad enough to cover an expanded site use, and does not