Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b694ca5b-4dcc-4098-be04-431e0137a936
Document Type: srp
Title: - 15.5.2
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0708/ML070820081.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.5.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
- March 2007 For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that the analysis of a transient resulting in an increase in reactor coolant inventory is acceptable and meets the requirements of General Design Criteria 10, 15, and 26, and the guidance of ANS standards. This conclusion is based on the following: 1. In meeting General Design Criteria 10,13, 15, and 26 as discussed below, the staff has determined that the applicant's analysis was performed using a mathematical model that has been previously reviewed and found acceptable by the staff. The parameters used as input to this model were reviewed and found to be suitably conservative. The staff has further determined that the positions of Regulatory Guide 1.53 for the single-failure criterion and Regulatory Guide 1.105 for instruments have also been satisfied. 2. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 10, and 26 with respect to demonstrating that resultant fuel damage is maintained because the specified acceptable fuel design limits were not exceeded for this event. 3. The applicant has met the GDC 13 requirements by demonstrating that all credited instrumentation was available, and that actuations of protection systems, automatic and manual, occurred at values of monitored parameters that were within the instruments’ prescribed operating ranges. 4. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 15 with respect to demonstrating that the reactor coolant pressure boundary limits have not been