Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 931b933f-eeb8-4e82-b76a-4813dde9214a
Document Type: srp
Title: SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING AND CLEANUP SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0631/ML063190013.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.1.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
h the capability to maintain acceptable pool water conditions. The staff reviews the descriptive information and drawings provided in the application to verify the following: A. The secondary reviewer reviews the cleanup system to verify it has the capacity and capability to remove corrosion products, radioactive materials, and impurities so that water clarity and quality will enable safe operating conditions in the pool. This includes instrumentation and sampling to monitor the water purity and need for demineralizer resin replacement, including the chemical and radiochemical limits such as conductivity, gross gamma and iodine activity, demineralizer differential pressure, pH and crud level, which are used to initiate corrective action. B. The capability for processing the refueling canal coolant during refueling operations has been provided. C. Provisions to preclude the inadvertent transfer of spent filter and demineralized media to any place other than the radwaste facility have been provided. 7. For reviews under 10 CFR Part 50, the procedures set forth above are used during the construction permit (CP) application review to determine that the design criteria and bases and the preliminary design as set forth in the preliminary SAR meet the acceptance criteria given in Subsection II of this SRP section. For the review of operating license (OL) applications, the review procedures are used to determine that the acceptance criteria and bases have been appropriately implemented in the final design as set forth in the final SAR. The review procedures for OL applications include a determination that the content and intent of the technical specifications prepared by the applicant are in agreement with the requirements for system testing, minimum performance, and surveillance developed as a result of the staff’s review. 8. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions