Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6bbbeb6a-491e-419f-8068-10f54f8bee3a
Document Type: srp
Title: -
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1235/ML12353A365.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
Draft Revision 4 - December 2012 unique to the site, such as potential aircraft crashes, and that are not specifically covered in Subsection II.3, on a case-by-case basis. Any deviations from the acceptance criteria for loads and load combinations should be adequately justified are identified. 4. Design and Analysis Procedures. The reviewer verifies that the applicant has committed to use the design and analysis procedures delineated in Article CC-3000 of the ASME Code and RG 1.136 (see Subsection II.3 of this SRP section). The reviewer evaluates any exceptions to these procedures on a case-by-case basis. The areas of review are evaluated for conformance with acceptance criteria contained in Subsection II.4 of this SRP section. 5. Structural Acceptance Criteria. The reviewer examines the limits on allowable stresses and strains in the concrete, reinforcement, the liner plate, and its anchors and in components of the prestressing system, if any, and compares them with the acceptable limits referenced in Subsection II.5 of this SRP section. If the applicant proposes to exceed some of these limits for some of the load combinations and at some localized points on the structure, the reviewer evaluates the justification provided to show that the structural integrity of the containment will not be affected. 6. Materials, Quality Control, and Special Construction Techniques. The reviewer evaluates the information provided on materials, quality control programs, and special construction techniques, if any, and compares to ensure that it meets the acceptance criteria referenced in Subsection II.6 of this SRP section. If the applicant is utilizing a material not used in previously licensed applications, the applicant needs to provide sufficient test and user data to establish the acceptability of the material. Similarly, the reviewer evaluates any new quality control programs or construction techniques to ensure that there will be no degradation of structural quality that