Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6e757273-b12b-4603-aace-b01e49e5a6da
Document Type: srp
Title: RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF FUEL HANDLING ACCIDENTS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350313.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.7.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
g operations.. The closure times Rev. 1 - July 1981 USNRC STANDARD REVIEW PLAN Standard review plans are prepared for the guidance of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants. These documents are made available to the public as part of the Commission's policy to inform the nuclear Industry and the general public of regulatory procedures and policies. Standard review plans are not substitutes for regulatory guides or the Commission's regulations and compliance with them Is not required. The standard review plan sections are keyed to the Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants. Not all sections of the Standard Format have a corresponding review plan. Published standard review plans will be revised periodically, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new Informa- fon and experience. Comments and suggestions for Improvement will be considered and should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Washington. D.C. 2O5 for the isolation valves in the lines are reviewed by the Containment Systems Branch (CSB). 4. The Effluent-Treatment Systems Branch (ETSB) reviews, under SRP Section 6.5.1, the ESF atmosphere clean-up systems used to mitigate the radiological consequences of accidents. ETSB provides the filter effi- ciencies for the ESF systems to AEB for use in the analysis of the radiological consequences. This is a secondary review effort by ETSB. 5. Auxiliary Systems Branch (ASB) reviews under SRP Section 9.4.2 the design and operation of the spent fuel pool area ventilation system. The AEB reviewer verifies with the ASB the assumptions for the system with respect to its function as a dose mitigating system. This is a coordinating review function. 6. The movement of heavy loads (i.e., loads heavier than the combined weight of a spent fuel assembly and the fuel handling tool)