Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 69433f0d-1a24-4cf6-b8b9-31109f9f51c5
Document Type: srp
Title: FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0631/ML063190014.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.5.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
established enhanced fire protection criteria for evolutionary light water reactors. SECY 93-087 recommended that the enhanced criteria be extended to include passive reactor designs. SECY 90 016 and SECY 93-087 were approved by the Commission in staff requirements memoranda (SRM). SECY 94-084, in part, establishes criteria defining safe-shutdown conditions for passive light water reactor designs. 7. For COL reviews, the description of the operational program and proposed implementation milestone(s) for the fire protection program are reviewed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.48. The operational program for fire protection should be fully implemented prior to fuel receipt at the plant site. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. For each type of submittal, the staff will conduct the review as follows: 1. New Reactor Applications a. For applications submitted in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, the staff reviews the preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) and the FPP in the final safety analysis report (FSAR). All applicable areas of review listed in Section I should be included in the review for a new reactor application. Reviews that cannot be performed adequately at the PSAR stage due to incomplete development of the FPP should be performed at the FSAR stage of the license application. See Appendix A to this SRP section for additional information. b. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in