Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: cf5af21e-7865-41fe-bc4c-b83bfde7ea75
Document Type: srp
Title: SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070205.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d emphasis of various aspects of the areas covered by this SAR section will be made by the reviewer on each case. The judgment on the areas to be given attention during the review is to be based on an inspection of the material presented, the similarity of the material to that recently reviewed on other plants, and whether items of special safety significance are involved. The information in this section of the SAR forms the basis for evaluations performed in various other sections. The purpose of this review is to establish the validity of the basic data, to check the UTM coordinates to assure that they include the zone number, and that the Northing and Easting are presented to within 100 meters. The latitude and longitude should be checked to assureensure that they are expressed to the nearest second. A scaled plot plan of the exclusion 27 area is reviewed which permits distance measurements to the exclusion area boundary in each of the 22-1/2 degree segments centered on the 16 cardinal compass points. The location and orientation of plant structures within the exclusion area are reviewed to identify potential liquid and gaseous effluent release points and their distances to restricted area and exclusion area boundary lines.28 The reviewer should verify that the boundary of the restricted area is shown on the plot plan or site maps and is described relative to plant structures. Verify that proposed radiological effluent release points are shown and identified. Check with the SPLB reviewer to verify that the applicant will meet the limitations in 20 CFR Subpart D. If the applicant has proposed alternate effluent limitations, check with the PERB reviewer to ascertain that the application contains sufficient information to evaluate those alternate limitations. Check with the PERB reviewer to DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 2.1.1-6 verify that the application contains sufficient detail to allow an evaluation of proposed controls for radiation protection purposes.29 The