Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 8a69e211-8100-413b-aa05-61dd44b10160
Document Type: srp
Title: REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350115.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 15
Section ID: 15.1.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
sults provided by RSB evaluates the radiological consequences associated with the fuel failure. The review of the Technical Specifications is coordinated and performed by the Licensing Guidance Branch (LGB) as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 16.0. For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility of other branches, the acceptance criteria necessary for the review and their methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP section of the corresponding review branch. 15.1.1-2 Rev. 1 - July 1981 IL. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The RSB acceptance criteria are based on meeting the relevant requirements of the following regulations: A. General Design Criterion 10, as it relates to the reactor coolant system being designed with appropriate margin to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during normal operations including anticipated operational occurrences. B. General Design Criterion 15, as it relates to the reactor coolant system and its associated auxiliaries being designed with appropriate margin to assure that the pressure boundary will not be breeched during normal operations including anticipated operational occurrences. C. General Design Criterion 26 as it relates to the reliable control of reactivity changes to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded, including anticipated operational occurrences. This is accomplished by assuring that appropriate margin for malfunctions, such as stuck rods are accounted for. D. TMI Action Plan items II.E.5.1 and II.E.5.2 of HVREG-0718 as they relate to assuring that any design modifications that result from the resolution of these Action Plan items are properly accounted for in the analyses. The basic objectives of the review of the transients which result from an increase in heat removal are: 1. To identify which of the moderate-frequency* transients that result in increased heat removal