Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6c5bc79e-d6b5-4e1b-a807-bb899a80abf0
Document Type: srp
Title: SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550023.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 2
Section ID: 2.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
specifications related to is acceptable and whether the technical specifications reflect consideration of any identified unique conditions. 2.1.1-5 Revision 3 - March 2007 These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant's evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. 1. Specification of Location: The information in this section of the SAR forms the basis for evaluations performed in other sections. The review serves to establish the validity of the basic data and to check the UTM coordinates and ensures that they include the zone number and that the northing and easting are presented to within 100 meters (328 feet). The staff will review latitude and longitude to ensure that they are expressed to the nearest second. The staff will review a scaled plot plan of the exclusion area, which permits distance measurements to the exclusion area boundary in each of the 22.5-degree sectors centered on the 16 cardinal compass points. If, in the reviewer’s judgment, maps of larger scale are desirable, they may be obtained from USGS. The USGS map index should be consulted for the specific names of the 7.5-minute quadrangles that bracket the site area. These maps provide topographic information in addition to details of prominent natural and manmade features in the site area. This information may be supplemented by updated information as available (e.g., aerial photographs or information obtained on the site visit). The reviewer should examine the plant layout to determine that the orientation of plant structures with respect to nearby roads, railroads, and waterways is clearly shown. The reviewer should apply engineering judgment to confirm that there is no obvious way in which transportation routes that traverse the exclusion area can interfere with normal plant