Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: dd687b37-3f26-4512-91d8-633ddb655821
Document Type: srp
Title: DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1602/ML16020A097.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
d Controls – Introduction,” SRP Table 7-1, and SRP Appendix 7.1-A, Acceptance Criteria and Guidelines for Instrumentation and Control Systems Important to Safety,” which list standards, RGs, and branch technical positions (BTPs). The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC’s regulations and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide acceptable methods of compliance with the NRC regulations. 1. SRP Appendix 7.1-B, “Guidance for Evaluation of Conformance to IEEE Std 279,” provides guidance for evaluating conformance to the requirements of IEEE Std 279-1971. 7.9-6 Revision 6 - August 2016 2. SRP Appendix 7.1-C, “Guidance for Evaluation of Conformance to IEEE Std 603,” provides guidance for evaluating conformance to IEEE Std 603-1991. 3. SRP Appendix 7.1-D, “Guidance for Evaluation of The Application of IEEE Std 7-4.3.2,” provides guidance for evaluating conformance to the acceptance criteria contained in RG 1.152, “Criteria for Use of Computers in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Plants,” which endorses IEEE Std 7-4.3.2, “IEEE Standard Criteria for Digital Computers in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Generating Stations.” III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. Typical reasons for a non-uniform placement of emphasis are the introduction of new design features or the use in the design of features previously reviewed and found acceptable. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying