Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: e42406a4-bb20-48c3-9910-1fe7ca591e7f
Document Type: srp
Title: (9)
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070297.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.1.176
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
il 1996 3.2.2-28 Appendix D BWR Plants Classification of Systems and Components In Course of Preparation Classification of Structures In Course of Preparation180 SRP Draft Section 3.2.2 Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence 3.2.2-29 DRAFT Rev. 2 - April 1996 Item numbers in the following table correspond to superscript numbers in the redline/strikeout copy of the draft SRP section. Item Source Description 1. Current PRB names and Editorial change made to reflect the current abbreviations abbreviation for the Mechanical Engineering Branch. 2. Current PRB names and Editorial change made to reflect the current abbreviations abbreviation for the Mechanical Engineering Branch. 3. Editorial, SRP-UDP format item Relocated this information to the new Review Interfaces subsection as review interface (with other PRBs). 4. Editorial Revised to eliminate use of a gender-specific pronoun. 5. SRP-UDP format item Added "applicable" to provide clarification that major Code Sections III and/or VIII may apply depending upon the quality group classification. 6. SRP-UDP format item Added identification of the ASME Code by reference number for the first discussion of the ASME Code in this SRP section. 7. Editorial Added punctuation to improve grammar. 8. SRP-UDP format item Added Review Interface subsection of Areas of Review using numbered paragraphs consistent with SRP-UDP required format so that reviews performed in other SRP Sections which are relevant to the overall review of quality group classification are detailed in their own subsection. 9. Current PRB names and Editorial change made to reflect the current abbreviations abbreviation for the Mechanical Engineering Branch. 10. Editorial, SRP-UDP format item Revised to reflect standard SRP-UDP format/content for the introduction to review interfaces. 11. Editorial Revised to clarify the intent of the statement regarding combination of seismic and quality group classifications and to use more appropriate