Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b4185506-3cba-4a2e-8cc2-3651202e2606
Document Type: srp
Title: SPENT FUEL POOL AREA VENTILATION SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070541.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.4.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
rd safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements and combined license action items, meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains DRAFT Rev. 3 - April 1996 9.4.2-10 procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, interface criteria, and ITAAC.60 IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that sufficient information has been provided and his that the review 61 supports conclusions of the following type, to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report (SER):62 The spent fuel pool area ventilation system (SFPAVS) includes all components and ductwork from air intake to the point of discharge where the system connects to the gaseous cleanup and treatment system or station vents. All portions of the system whose failure may result in release of radioactivity which causes an offsite dose of more than 5 mSv (0.5 rem) to the whole body or its equivalent to any part of the body shall be 63 classified seismic Category I and safety related. Based on the review of the applicant's proposed design criteria, the design bases, and safety classification for the spent fuel pool area ventilation system and the requirements for system performance to prevent an unacceptable release of contaminants to the environment during normal, abnormal, and accident conditions, the staff concludes that the design of the spent fuel pool area ventilation system and supporting systems is acceptable and meets the Commission's regulations as set forth in General Design Criteria 2, 5, 60, and 61. This conclusion is based on the following: 1. The applicant has met the requirements of GDC 2 with respect to the system being capable of withstanding the effects of earthquakes by meeting the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.29, "Seismic Design Classification,"64 Position C.1 for safety-related portions of the