Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 94da2f11-6df6-47d0-a25e-edeb21a4d649
Document Type: srp
Title: 3.7.1-12
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1419/ML14198A460.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
tions. The information provided by the applicant to address the review considerations in the SRP acceptance criteria of Subsection II.4 of this SRP section is reviewed. The review should conclude that the CSDRS envelop the site-specific FIRS for a COL application that references a DC. In 3.7.1-21 Revision 4 – December 2014 addition, the review should conclude that the applicant addressed the identified COL action items. If these acceptance criteria are not met, then the technical basis for alternative methods needs to be provided by the applicant for review and approval. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) satisfies the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the DCD. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer should verify that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's SER. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that the seismic design parameters used in the design of plant SSCs are acceptable and meet the applicable