Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: d72c5a84-b363-4a7d-9df3-5570a5eceb2c
Document Type: srp
Title: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350108.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
whether the applicant has provided sufficient reserve capacity for greater-than-expected waste volumes which may occur as a result of anticipated operational occurrences. The inplant storage capacity, for areas designed to accommodate approximately six months' waste generation, is compared to the-guidelines of BTP ETSB 11-3 (Ref. 1). The comparison will be based on the design criteria as stated in the SAR, on the availability of system components to handle surge flows, and on whether the storage facilities will provide onsite storage periods sufficient to permit the decay of short-lived radionuclides. For longer term onsite storage (several years, but'significantly less than life of the plant) the storage facility is compared to the guidelines of Appendix A to this SRP section (Ref. 3). 5. If the SWS contains any storage or makes use of flammable materials, ETSB requests the CEB to provide a review under SRP Section 16.0. 11.4-4 Rev. 2 - July 1981 6. ETSB compares the quality group classifications of the solid waste system to the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.143 (Ref. 2). 7. ETSB compares the seismic design of the structures housing the SWS to the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.143 (Ref. 2). Exceptions are transmitted to MEB, which has primary responsibility under SRP Section 3.2.1. 8. ETSB compares equipment layout, design features, and mode of operation of the solid waste system to the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.143 (Ref. 2) and (BTP) ETSB 11-3 (Ref. 1). 9. At the OL stage ETSB reviews the technical specifications proposed by the applicant for process and effluent control for input to the review of SRP Section 16.0. The reviewer will determine that the content and intent of the technical specifications prepared by the applicant are in agreement with the requirement developed as a result of the staff's review. The review will include the evaluation or development of appropriate limiting conditions for operation and their bases consistent with the plant