Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 67dddfbb-43f1-4ea2-995b-b50e228f419f
Document Type: srp
Title: NEW FUEL STORAGE
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350536.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.1.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
alculations and staff judgments with respect to facility functions and component selection. The design of the new fuel storage facility is acceptable if the integrated design is in accordance with the following criteria: 1. General Design Criterion 2, as it relates to the ability of structures hous- ing the facility and the facility components to withstand the effects of 9.1.1-2 Rev. 2 - July 1981 earthquakes. Acceptance is based on meeting the guidance of Regulatory Guide 1.29, position C.1.1, as it relates to seismic classification of facil- ity components. 2. General Design Criterion 5, as it relates to shared structures, systems and components important to safety being capable of performing required safety functions. 3. General Design Criterion 61, as it relates to the facility design for fuel storage. 4. General Design Criterion 62, as it relates to the prevention of criti- cality by physical systems or processes utilizing geometrically safe configurations. Specific criteria necessary to meet the requirements of General Design Criteria 61 and 62 are ANS 57.1, "Design Requirements for LWR Fuel Handling Systems," and ANS 57.3, "Design Requirements for New LWR Fuel Storage Facilities" (proposed), as they relate to the prevention of criticality and to the aspects of the radio- logical design. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The procedures below are used during the construction permit (CP) application review to determine that the applicant's design criteria and bases and the pre- liminary design meet the acceptance criteria given in subsection II of this SRP section. For operating license (OL) applications, the review procedures and acceptance criteria are utilized to verify that the initial design criteria and bases have been appropriately implemented in the final design as set forth in the final safety analysis report. The review procedures given are for a typical storage system. Any variance of the review, to adjust to a proposed unique design, is such as to assure that