Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 03aed7b8-74fc-467b-b928-b25d9eb89a13
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY — REVIEW OF PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1301/ML13010A109.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
mit, the COL application must satisfy the site design parameters and any other restrictions established in the early site permit or justify a variance from the early site permit. In any event, the COL applicant must show that the actual site characteristics fall within the site design parameters postulated in the standard design, modify the design (depart from the DCD) to accommodate the site characteristics, or reanalyze site characteristics to show that the 13.6.2-9 Draft Revision 2 – September 2013 design is acceptable at the site. This last possibility may involve the COL applicant justifying a variance from the site characteristics established in the ESP. Review Interfaces Other SRP sections interface with this section as follows: 1. The design descriptions and information related to the design of plant systems, structures, and components credited for performing security functions are found in Tier 1 and Tier 2 (FSAR) of the DC application. Review interfaces may be required based on the applicant’s approach to the design of engineered systems that perform security functions. Examples include plant lighting systems that may perform multiple functions that satisfy both safety and security requirements and may not necessarily be designed as a dedicated system for the sole purpose of providing or supporting only a security or a safety (i.e., a single) function. 2. The staff that has primary or lead review responsibilities, as indicated in the applicable SRP sections, will review the adequacy of the design of engineered systems. The secondary reviewers provide assurance that the interfaces are addressed when the engineered structures, systems, and components are provided to meet multiple functions (i.e., safety, security, and environmental protection). 3. The physical security review should include and confirm how the proposed designs and specifications meet the applicable physical security performance and prescriptive regulatory requirements. 4. The following