Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: b6b57a00-5b85-4f0c-965c-ca89ef4265e7
Document Type: srp
Title: DETERMINATION OF RUPTURE LOCATIONS AND DYNAMIC EFFECTS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1608/ML16088A041.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.6.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
c safety issues which are identified in the version of NUREG-0933, “Resolution of Generic Safety Issues,” current on the date up to 6 months before the docket date of the application and which are technically relevant to the design; (2) demonstrate how the operating experience insights have been incorporated into the plant design; and, (3) provide information necessary to demonstrate compliance with any technically relevant portions of the Three Mile Island requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.34(f), except paragraphs 10 CFR 50.34(f)(1)(xii), 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(ix), and 10 CFR 50.34(f)(3)(v) for a DC application, and except paragraphs 10 CFR 50.34 (f)(1)(xii), 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(ix), 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xxv), and 10 CFR 50.34 (f)(3)(v) for a COL application. These cross-cutting review areas should be addressed by the reviewer for each technical subsection and relevant conclusions documented in the corresponding safety evaluation report (SER) section. 3.6.2-6 Revision 3 – December 2016 2. Review of the effects of postulated pipe ruptures on structures is a primary responsibility under SRP Section 3.6.2, “Determination of Rupture Locations and Dynamic Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping.” First it must be determined whether the equipment is needed to perform a safety-related function or a risk- significant function. SRP Section 3.2.2, “System Quality Group Classification,” and SRP Section 19.3 as related to augmented design standards provide guidance on the identification of the SSCs subject to protection against postulated pipe ruptures. The safety-related functions or the risk-significant functions of the SSCs in the various plant designs are essentially the same; however, the location and arrangement of the SSCs and the methods used may vary depending upon individual design. The reviewer must evaluate variations in plant designs as individual cases. SSCs that perform safety functions or which by virtue of their failure could affect