Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 924aeba2-7603-48d5-9467-ab37f7d036f0
Document Type: srp
Title: Revision 6 - August 2016
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1601/ML16019A169.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 7
Section ID: 7
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
not involve a conversion. The applicant or licensee should first perform an analysis to determine the complete list of variables and their associated types in accordance with the selection criteria of Revision 4. Without such an analysis, there would not be a means to correlate Revision 4 criteria being applied to the modification of variables that have been previously licensed to the criteria of Revision 2 or 3. The applicant or licensee should document the proposed modifications in a table format that includes for each variable the following: variable name, current type, current function or purpose, current range, proposed type, proposed function or purpose, proposed range, and any criteria that would be changed. For variables for which there is a proposed change in type or purpose, the applicant or licensee should document the rationale for the change. Licensees may make modifications within the plant’s current licensing basis without referencing Revision 4 of RG 1.97. BTP 7-10-8 Revision 6 - August 2016 4. Review Procedures SRP Section 7.5, “Information Systems Important to Safety,” Section III, describes the review procedure for accident monitoring instrumentation. BTP 7-10-9 Revision 6 – August 2016 Table 1. For BWRs: Acceptable Deviations and Clarifications to Revisions 2 and 3 of Regulatory Guide 1.97 Variable Deviation Acceptance Guidelines/Clarification Neutron flux • Category • Equipment qualification • Redundancy • Power source • Quality assurance • Range Except for applications submitted after January 13, 1993 (which should satisfy the guidelines identified in RG 1.97), the design criteria identified in NEDO-31558-A, “Position on Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) RG 1.97, Revision 3, Requirements for Post-Accident Neutron Monitoring System,” are an acceptable alternative to Category 1 criteria. Pursuant to these alternative criteria, the applicant/licensee should perform a plant-specific evaluation of the electrical power