Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ccb8326d-5db5-47ed-b8ae-e7f1a1b6f3ed
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING - INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES,
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550021.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 14
Section ID: 14.3.9
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
analysis is detailed and comprehensive, (3) RG 1.97, Revision 3, Category 1 variables or RG 1.97, Revision 4, Type A, B, and C variables for accident monitoring are included, and (4) important system displays and controls described in Tier 1 system design descriptions necessary for transient mitigation are included. Technical Rationale The technical rationale for application of these acceptance criteria to the areas of review addressed by this SRP section is discussed in the following paragraphs: 1. Application of 10 CFR 52.47(b)(1), as it relates to ITAAC (for DC) provides reasonable assurance that the SSCs in this area of review will operate in accordance with the design certification, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the NRC’s regulations; 14.3.9-6 March 2007 2. Application of 10 CFR 52.80(a), as it relates to ITAAC (for COL) provides reasonable assurance the SSCs in this area of review have been constructed and will be operated in conformity with the combined license, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the NRC’s regulations. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The reviewer will select material from the procedures described below, as may be appropriate for a particular case. These review procedures are based on the identified SRP acceptance criteria. For deviations from these acceptance criteria, the staff should review the applicant’s evaluation of how the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable method of complying with the relevant NRC requirements identified in Subsection II. 1. Follow the general procedures for review of Tier 1 contained in the Review Procedures section of SRP Section 14.3. Ensure that the DCD is consistent with Appendix A to SRP Section 14.3. 2. Ensure that all Tier 1 information is consistent with Tier 2 information. ITAAC such as the final design verification ITAAC should be reviewed to ensure that the ITAAC accurately describes an inspection to verify that an as-built plant is built and operates in conformance to the