Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: faf774de-7226-41f8-ba11-7cf612907af6
Document Type: srp
Title: GASEOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1306/ML13065A119.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
5 an 13.4. III. REVIEW PROCEDURES The review procedures section was updated in recognition of the revisions identified in the areas of review and acceptance criteria sections, as noted in explanations above. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation findings section was revised by expanding the discussions on the results of the staff’s evaluation and conclusion of acceptability against cited regulations and guidance. The revisions address: 1. Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 61, as it relates to the consequence analyses conducted under SRP Section 11.3, using the guidance in BTP 11-5. 2. Using RG 1.143, compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 2 and 61, as they relate to acceptance criteria related to seismic, safety, and quality group classifications and quality assurance provisions for SSCs of the GWMS for gaseous wastes produced during normal operation and AOOs. The acceptance criteria are revised to conform with 10 CFR Part 20 dose limits for members of the public and plant workers, given assumed locations in restricted areas for workers and unrestricted areas for members of the public. 3. Development of radioactive source terms using RG 1.112, NUREG-0016, NUREG-0017, DC/COL-ISG-05 in using GALE86 and ANSI/ANS 18.1-1999, and whether specific adjustments are made in consideration of specific design and operating features of the proposed reactor design. 4. If applicable, proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the design and resulting effects on the development of associated 11.3-44 Draft Revision 4 – August 2014 radioactive gaseous effluent source terms and compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 effluent concentration and dose limits and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives and ALARA provisions. 5. Confirmation that the approach used in an ESP application in developing effluent source terms, as a plant parameter envelope, is consistent with the identified type of reactor design and conservatively bounding