Document: NUREG-1555
Document ID: 5283dfb7-caf8-4f93-8676-40a01932c369
Document Type: esrp
Title: HISTORIC PROPERTIES
Source: NUREG-1555
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1555/initial/
Revision Date: 2007-10
Chapter: 4
Section ID: 4.1.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ncover data and material, removal of structures or salvage of architectural features, and other steps that will ensure full knowledge of the lost resource. ` Salvaged artifacts and materials should be deposited where they are of public and educational benefit. (10) Assess the operational impacts on historic properties concurrently with this review. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The ESRP review should accomplish the following objectives: (1) public disclosure of potential impacts, (2) presentation of the basis for the staff analysis, and (3) presentation of staff conclusions regarding impacts of the reviewed construction activities on historic properties. Normally this section should be divided into two subsections: 4.1.3.1, Site and Vicinity; and 4.1.3.2, Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas. The following information should be included in the environmental impact statement (EIS): ` a positive statement of no effect for properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register that will not be affected ` potential impacts to the properties that are listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. Discuss the steps that led to a determination of whether any effects are adverse. ` any adverse impacts on historic properties not eligible for inclusion in the National Register ` any measures and controls that are available to limit adverse impacts. Evaluation of each identified impact results in one of the following determinations: ` The impact is small, and mitigation is not required. When all impacts are of this nature, the reviewer should include a statement in the environmental impact statement of the following type: The staff reviewed the available information on the impacts on historic properties from construction activities. Based on this review, the staff concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts. ` The impact is adverse, but can be mitigated by specific design or procedure modifications that the reviewer has