Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 3c241845-034f-4f89-b12a-f51967895c13
Document Type: srp
Title: PROCESS AND EFFLUENT RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1307/ML13071A494.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
measurements of radioactivity in environmental samples as part of the QA program. The review of the REMP evaluates (1) administrative and operational procedures associated with its implementation, (2) descriptions of programs and procedures addressing QA and quality control supporting its implementation, (3) description of information to be contained in annual radiological environmental operating reports, (4) listing of requirements mandating reports to the NRC, and (5) process for initiating and documenting changes to the REMP and its supporting procedures. The review of the REMP is conducted as part of the review of this SRP section, depending on where the applicant has located the procedural details and 11.5-33 Draft Revision 6 – August 2014 programmatic controls of the REMP in the ODCM or PCP, given the provisions of GL 89-01 and NUREG-1301 or NUREG-1302. D. The PCP and associated plant TS (Administrative Controls) are reviewed to determine whether they identify all regulatory requirements, follow NRC guidance, and contain all appropriate operational elements. The review of the PCP may be conducted as part of the review of SRP Section 11.4 or as part of the review of this SRP section, depending on where the applicant has located the procedural details and programmatic controls of the PCP, given the provisions of GL 89-01 and NUREG-1301 or NUREG-1302. SRP Section 11.4 addresses the review and evaluation of the PCP and identifies the regulatory requirements associated with the handling, processing (e.g., dewatering, solidification, and compaction), characterization, packaging, and shipment of radioactive wastes to authorized low-level waste disposal sites or licensed waste processors. E. If applicable, the staff reviews the proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the PERMISS design and resulting effects on the development of the RETS/SREC and ODCM. The staff’s evaluation and conclusion of the acceptability of the augmented