Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 73747cf4-ff95-449b-b6b0-53dc0755b9e0
Document Type: srp
Title: OTHER SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1235/ML12353A382.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.8.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
to accommodate inservice inspection of other Category I structures are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The reviewer evaluates any other testing and inservice surveillance programs on a case- by-case basis. 8. Masonry Walls. The reviewer should ensure that the applicant meets the requirements identified in Appendix A to this SRP section. 9. Design Certification/Combined License Application Reviews. For review of a DC application, the reviewer should follow the above procedures to verify that the design, including requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an ESP or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS 3.8.4-18 Draft Revision 4 – December 2012 The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's Safety Evaluation Report (SER). The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that the design of safety-related structures other than containment or containment interior structures is acceptable and meets the relevant requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a and GDCs 1, 2, 4, and 5. This