Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: c8e356de-6353-4224-8b1c-72f7e218597d
Document Type: srp
Title: MAIN CONDENSERS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070510077.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 10
Section ID: 10.4.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
V. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The main condenser (MC) system, includes all components and equipment from the turbine exhaust to the connections and interfaces with the main condensate and other systems. The system design has been reviewed and found to meet the requirements of General Design Criteria 60. The basis for acceptance of the MC in our review was conformance of the design, design criteria, and design bases to the Commission's regulation as set forth in GDC 60. The staff concludes that the MC system design is acceptable and meets the requirements of GDC 60 with respect to failures in the design of the system which do not result in excessive releases of radioactivity to the environment. The applicant has met this requirement by providing design features to preclude uncontrolled radioactive material leakage into and out of the MC. For DC and COL reviews, the findings will also summarize the staff’s evaluation of requirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters) and COL action items relevant to this SRP section. In addition, to the extent that the review is not discussed in other SER sections, the findings will summarize the staff's evaluation of the ITAAC, including design acceptance criteria, as applicable. V. IMPLEMENTATION The staff will use this SRP section in performing safety evaluations of DC applications and license applications submitted by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or 10 CFR Part 52. Except when the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the Commission’s regulations, the staff will use the method described herein to evaluate conformance with Commission regulations. The