Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 92e07546-68d7-4c8e-a984-7d1f1f4d882d
Document Type: srp
Title: EQUIPMENT AND FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0705/ML070550042.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 9
Section ID: 9.3.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
quirements and restrictions (e.g., interface requirements and site parameters), set forth in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) meets the acceptance criteria. DCs have referred to the FSAR as the design control document (DCD). The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 9.3.3-8 Revision 3 - March 2007 6. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff’s safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. The EFDS includes all piping from equipment or floor drains to the sump, the sump pumps, and the pumps and piping network necessary to route effluents to the drain tanks and then to the radwaste system. The basis for acceptance in the staff review is compliance of the applicant’s designs and design criteria for the safety-related EFDS portions and necessary auxiliary supporting systems with NRC regulations as set forth in the GDCs and with applicable RGs, staff technical positions, and industry standards. The staff concludes that the EFDS design is acceptable and complies with the requirements of GDCs 2, 4, and 60 as to seismic design, environmental conditions, and control of release of radioactive materials. This