Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: d0e1f2cb-f296-449d-9f9a-85a571917a44
Document Type: srp
Title: EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052340709.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.3
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
s the thermal shock effect of water injected into the primary coolant system from the ECCS. The Procedures and Systems Review Branch (PSRB) reviews the proposed preoperational and initial startup test pro- grams to determine that they are consistent with the intent of Regulatory 6.3-2 Rev. 2 - April 1984 Guides 1.68 and 1.79 as part of its primary review responsibility for SRP Section 14.2. The PSRB also has primary review responsibility for Task Action Plan items II.K.1 (C.1.10) of NUREG-0694 (OLs only) and I.C.6 of NUREG-0718 (CPs only) regarding procedures to ensure that system operability status is known. The Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) has primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 12.1 through 12.5 including Task Action Plan items II.B.2 of NUREG-0694 and NUREG-0718 which involve radiation and shielding design review to take corrective actions to ensure adequate access to vital areas and protection of safety equipment (CPs and OLs). The review for Technical Specifications and Quality Assurance are coordinated and performed by the Standardization and Special Projects Branch and Quality Assurance Branch as part of their primary review responsibility for SRP Sections 16.0 and 17.0, respectively. For those areas of review identified above as being reviewed as part of the primary review responsibility of other branches, the acceptance criteria necessary for the review and their.methods of application are contained in the referenced SRP section of the corresponding primary branch. II. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The RSB acceptance criteria are based on meeting the relevant requirements of the following regulations: A. General Design Criterion 2 as it relates to the seismic design of struc- tures, systems, and components whose failure could cause an unacceptable reduction in the capability of the ECCS to perform its safety function. Acceptability is based on meeting position C2 of Regulatory Guide 1.29. B. General Design Criterion 4 as related to dynamic effects