Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 6b7eddf4-f7ce-4821-9f11-e37070221e57
Document Type: srp
Title: DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AND
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1613/ML16133A418.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 3
Section ID: 3.9.2
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
ce with the acceptance criteria in Section II.3 of this SRP. In addition, the analysis should be verified by correlation with the test results. 4. For a CP application, the reviewer should verify that the program for preoperational and initial startup vibration testing of reactor internals for FIV includes the following: A. The applicant should specify the intention to perform preoperational and initial startup vibration monitoring based on categorization of each specific component as a prototype, limited prototype, or non-prototype. 3.9.2-35 Revision 4 – March 2017 B. The applicant should describe the preoperational and initial startup vibration test program. The staff review will be based on compliance of this program with the requirements of subsection II.4 (Acceptance Criteria) of this SRP section. C. If the component is a non-prototype, the applicant should specify the valid prototype component in a plant of similar design. The staff reviews the appropriateness of the designated valid prototype, including any differences in the flow conditions or the design of reactor internal structures, from the valid prototype to verify whether any design modifications substantially alter the behavior of the flow transients and the response of the reactor internals. Additional detailed analysis, SMTs, or installation of some instrumentation during the confirmatory test may be necessary to complete the review. In addition, the applicant will need to implement a prototype program if timely adequate test results are not obtained for the designated valid prototype. For an OL application, the reviewer should verify the following: A. The applicant has developed a detailed preoperational and initial startup vibration test program and the schedule for its implementation. If elements of the program differ substantially from the guidelines specified in RG 1.20, the applicant has justified the differences. B. The applicant has addressed the acceptability of vibration prediction, the