Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 80cafbe7-f4f0-4366-8dd3-76fec74d85a7
Document Type: srp
Title: HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0409/ML040920139.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 18
Section ID: 18.0
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
iews. In addition, the staff may witness the integrated system validation evaluations. A documented description of the frial HSI design that resulted from the HSI task support verification, HFE design verification, integrated system validation, and issue resolution verification activities should be reviewed. Finally, the installation of the completed design in the plant should be reviewed, if time and resources permit. 7. Human Performance Monitorinq. Submittals for the staffs review of an applicant's human performance monitoring program should be made on a case-by-case basis. 8. ITAAC. For standard design certification reviews under 10 CFR Part 52, the procedures above should be followed, as modified by the procedures in SRP Section 14.3 and its subsections. SRP Section 14.3, contains procedures for the review of certified design material (CDM) for the standard design, including the site parameters, Interface criteria, and inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC). IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The NRC staffs findings that an applicant's submittals are acceptable in each individual area of review may be based on: 1. The reviewers determination that all associated review criteria are satisfied. 2. The reviewer's determination that alternative means of satisfying review criteria are acceptable. 3. The reviewer's determination that acceptable justification for deviations from review criteria exist. The justifications may be based upon such evidence as analyses of recent literature, analyses of current practices and operational experience, tradeoff studies, and the results of engineering experiments and evaluations. The staffs overall review conclusion is determined by comparing the goals of the HFE review, which are based on the type and purpose of the HFE review, to the evidence provided in the applicant's submittals. Important considerations include: 1. Did the reviewer examine all relevant areas of review? - 2. Did the reviewer evaluate each area of