Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: ad57d9ae-7f2d-4d9e-9a6b-f08153f386c6
Document Type: srp
Title: NUREG-0800
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052070494.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 8
Section ID: 8
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
sits should appropriately reflect the design set forth in the safety analysis report, including inspections, tests, analysis, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC), site interface requirements, and combined license action items, to ensure that the licensee's implementation of the design is consistent with relevant regulatory requirements, inspection/review criteria, and commitments. SRP Section 14.3 (proposed) contains procedures for the review of site specific information, interface criteria, and ITAAC during the review of the license application.12 8B-5 DRAFT Rev. 1 - April 1996 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] SRP Draft Section visit Attachment A - Proposed Changes in Order of Occurrence DRAFT Rev. 1 - April 1996 8B-6 Item numbers in the following table correspond to superscript numbers in the redline/strikeout copy of the draft SRP section. Item Source Description 1. Editorial Added dash to numbering scheme for consistency with Appendix 8-A. 2. Update to reflect current NRC Revised to reflect that identification of the organization organization(s) discussed as the "Regional Office(s)" is now appropriate. 3. Editorial Added consideration of the separation and insolation between major power supplies, as appropriate, during the site visit. See SRP Sections 8.2 and 8.3.1 Areas of Review. 4. Editorial Revised to correct a typographical error. 5. No change Consideration should be given, if the PRB concurs, to deletion of this item as an agenda consideration based upon the fact that Electrical Engineering Branch (EELB) is not currently responsible for the review of instrument piping. 6. No change Consideration should be given, if the PRB concurs, to deletion of this item as an agenda consideration based upon the fact that Electrical Engineering Branch (EELB) is not currently responsible for the review of the turbine. 7. No change Consideration should be given, if the PRB concurs, to deletion of this item as an agenda consideration based upon the fact that Electrical