Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 66e7af3b-21c0-444f-8737-0830bb176eba
Document Type: srp
Title: PROCESS AND EFFLUENT RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1502/ML15029A182.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 11
Section ID: 11.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
n of acceptability against cited regulations and guidance. The revisions address: 1. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 2 and GDC 61, as they relate to acceptance criteria related to seismic, safety, and quality group classifications and quality assurance provisions for PERMISS component interfaces with RWMS process equipment, using the guidance of RG 1.143 2. If applicable, proposed augmentation of programmatic elements in assessing the adequacy of the design and development of PERMISS monitoring and sampling equipment in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 effluent concentration and dose limits and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I design objectives and ALARA provisions. 3. Confirmation that the applicant has committed, as an option, to develop a plant and site- specific ODCM before fuel load, based on NEI ODCM Template 07-09A. 4. Expanded discussion in determining compliance with the EPA generally applicable environmental radiation standards of 40 CFR Part 190, as implemented under 10 CFR 20.1301(e). 5. For sites with applicants and licensees operating two or more reactors, the evaluation findings address whether applicants and licensees have included in their respective ODCMs a process for notifying the other licensee in coordinating effluent releases to ensure that, when combined, effluent concentrations and offsite dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 are not exceeded at a common dose receptor location. V. IMPLEMENTATION The implementation section was revised by expanding the discussions on the evaluation of ESP, DC, COL applications. The expanded discussion address differences between standard plant design features, COL applications, and SRP acceptance criteria, and provide guidance on the acceptability of alternative methods in complying with cited regulations and SRP acceptance criteria. 11.5-69 Revision 6 – January 2016 VI. REFERENCES The following references were added in support of the expanded discussions presented in areas of review, acceptance criteria, and