Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 1208e599-dada-403d-b32e-6b4ff716e271
Document Type: srp
Title: PHYSICAL SECURITY
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0523/ML052350096.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 13
Section ID: 13.6
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
the information requirements of subsection I above; and the acceptance criteria of subsection II above. Applicable regula- tions and the requirements and recommendations of industry standards (such as ANSI 18.17) are used as checklists for this review. The reviewers may also use appropriate Division 5 Regulatory Guides and Review Guidelines 1 through 24 to the extent they are applicable to physical protection programs at nuclear poiwer plants. Those having potential applicability are listed in the references. It is particularly important that the reviewer assure himself that all items of vital equipment are contained within vital areas. Site visits by the reviewers are necessary, during the construction phase, before the evaluation of the plan can be completed. Upon completion of the installation of the security equipment, a confirmatory site visit is made approximately 3 months before the anticipated fuel loading. Only after that final confirmatory site visit is the security program approved. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The evaluation finding at the PSAR stage should be substantially equivalent to the following statement: The applicant has provided a general description of plans for pro- tecting the plant against potential acts of radiological sabotage. Provisions for the'screening of employees at the plant, and for design phase review of plant layout and protection of vital equip- ment have been described and conform to 10 CFR Part 73, §73.55. We find there is reasonable assurance that the final physical security plan will meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 25, 10 CFR Part 73, and 10 CFR Part 95 by'conforming to regulatory positions in regulatory guides or equivalent guidance. We conclude that the applicant's arrangements for protection of the plant against acts of radiological sabotage are satisfactory for this stage of the licensing process. The evaluation finding at the FSAR stage should be substantially equivalent to the following statement: The applicant has