Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 45af6b56-d986-4eee-88d4-283b99c8b243
Document Type: srp
Title: OPERATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0707/ML070720017.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.5
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
reports to the NRC concerning individual exposures that exceed regulatory limits, incidents requiring notification, levels of radiation or concentrations of radioactive materials in excess of certain values, and planned special exposures. 22. 10 CFR 20.2206 and 10 CFR 19.13, as they relate to requirements for informing workers of the results of their individual monitoring. 23. 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(viii) and 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xxvii)1, as they relate to monitoring of in- plant radiation and airborne radioactivity for routine and accident conditions. Refer also to NUREG-0737, items II.B.3 and III.D.3.3, for additional detail and clarification of requirements. 24. 10 CFR 50.120, as it relates to the provisions and requirements for training radiation protection technicians. 25. General Design Criterion (GDC) 64 found in Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, as it relates to the provision of appropriate monitoring for the reactor containment atmosphere and spaces containing components for the recirculation of loss-of-coolant-accident fluids. 26. Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Subpart H of 10 CFR Part 71, as they relate to quality assurance programs. 27. 10 CFR 71.5 and Subpart G of 10 CFR Part 71, as they relate to the control of licensed radioactive material during packaging and transportation, as well as Subpart K of 10 CFR Part 20, as it relates to the transfer of low-level radioactive materials and waste. SRP Acceptance Criteria Specific SRP acceptance criteria acceptable to meet the relevant requirements of the NRC’s regulations identified above are as follows for the review described in this SRP section. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC’s regulations, and compliance with it is not required. However, an applicant is required to identify differences between the design features, analytical techniques, and procedural measures proposed for its facility and the SRP acceptance criteria and evaluate how the proposed alternatives to the SRP acceptance criteria provide