Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 06c37003-9353-480d-8755-cc80bcbb0d47
Document Type: srp
Title: ASSURING THAT OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURES ARE AS LOW AS
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1218/ML12186A005.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 12
Section ID: 12.1
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
s have referred to the FSAR as the design control document. The reviewer should also consider the appropriateness of identified COL action items. The reviewer may identify additional COL action items; however, to ensure these COL action items are addressed during a COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). 12.1-8 Draft Revision 4- October 2012 5. For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. 6. The review of a COL application ensures that information contained in the FSAR is sufficient to fully describe the program, or that ITAAC have been provided for the program. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's SER. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. 1. The staff concludes that the ALARA policy, design, and operational [or, for COLs, design and implementation] considerations are acceptable. This conclusion is based on the applicant having met the training requirements of 10 CFR 19.12, the ALARA provisions of 10 CFR 20.1101(b), and the guidance in RG 8.8 (Regulatory Position C.2) and 8.10 (Regulatory Position C.1). 2. The applicant has provided a management commitment to ensure that [plant name] will be designed, constructed, and operated in a manner consistent with the above criteria. The [title of person or group (e.g., plant health physicist and staff)] periodically reviews, updates, and modifies as appropriate plant design features and changes, as well as all operating and