Document: NUREG-0800
Document ID: 632e6c59-03bd-4648-b0b3-e8b2efd6fa04
Document Type: srp
Title: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION SYSTEM
Source: NUREG-0800
Source URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0703/ML070380197.pdf
Revision Date: 2023-06
Chapter: 6
Section ID: 6.2.4
CFR Part: 
CFR Title: 

Content:
COL application, they should be added to the DC FSAR. For review of a COL application, the scope of the review is dependent on whether the COL applicant references a DC, an early site permit (ESP) or other NRC approvals (e.g., manufacturing license, site suitability report or topical report). For review of both DC and COL applications, SRP Section 14.3 should be followed for the review of ITAAC. The review of ITAAC cannot be completed until after the completion of this section. IV. EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the applicant has provided sufficient information and that the review and calculations (if applicable) support conclusions of the following type to be included in the staff's safety evaluation report. The reviewer also states the bases for those conclusions. The staff concludes that the containment isolation system functional design is acceptable and meets the requirements of GDCs 1, 2, 4, 16, 54, 55, 56, and 57, 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix K, the additional TMI-related requirements 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xiv) and 10 CFR 50.34(f)(2)(xv), and the SBO requirements of 10 CFR 50.63(a)(2). The conclusion is based on the following findings: 1. The applicant has met the requirements of [regulation] for [limits of review under regulation] by (for each item applicable to the review how it was met and why acceptable for the regulation): A. Meeting the regulatory positions in NUREG __________ or RGs _____; B. Meeting an alternative method to regulatory positions in RG _____ reviewed by the staff and found acceptable; C. Meeting the regulatory position in BTP ________; D. Using calculation methods (for what was evaluated) previously reviewed by the staff and found acceptable; the staff has reviewed the impact parameters in this case and found them suitably conservative or has performed independent calculations to verify acceptability of their analysis; or E. Meeting the provisions (industry standard number and title) reviewed by the staff and determined to be