recall-to-reject process / processus de rappel pour rejeter
Synonyms: disqualifying recall-to-reject, recollection rejection
Synonymes : rejet de la recollection
Group: Human, Psychology
Groupe : Homme, Psychologie
Definition: Memory monitoring process to avoid false memories in recognition tasks and "based on the recall of logically inconsistent information (which disqualifies the false event from having occurred)" (Gallo et al., 2006, p. 730).
Définition : Processus de surveillance de la mémoire permettant d’éviter les faux souvenirs et « basé sur le rappel d'informations logiquement incohérentes (ce qui disqualifie l'événement faux d'avoir eu lieu) » (Gallo et al., 2006, p. 730).
Broader term: memory-editing process
Terme générique : processus de révision mnésique
Related terms: false memory, recognition task, distinctiveness heuristic, recognition memory, identify-to-reject process, procedural metamemory, recollection
Termes associés : faux souvenir, tâche de reconnaissance, heuristique de distinctivité, mémoire de reconnaissance, identifier pour rejeter, métamémoire procédurale, recollection
Selected bibliography: Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110(4), 762–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.762 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Cadavid, S., Beato, M. S., Suarez, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2021). Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the deese/roediger-mcdermott paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390 [Study type: empirical study / Access: open], Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199660 [Study type: empirical study / Access: open], Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Gallo, D. A., Bell, D. M., Beier, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic. Memory, 14(6), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210600648506 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Moore, K. N., Lampinen, J. M., Bridges, A. J., & Gallo, D. A. (2020). Developmental trends in children’s use of different monitoring processes to avoid false memories. Cognitive Development, 55, 100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100911 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Pierce, B. H., Waring, J. D., Schacter, D. L., & Budson, A. E. (2008). Effects of distinctive encoding on source-based false recognition: Further examination of recall-to-reject processes in aging and alzheimer disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 21(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0b013e31817d74e7 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2623 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2701 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed]