judgment of learning / jugement d'apprentissage
Synonyms: JOL
Group: Human, Psychology
Groupe : Homme, Psychologie
Definition: Metamemory judgment "whereby participants indicate the likelihood that they will recall learnt material on a future test" (Double et al., 2018, p. 741).
Définition : Jugement métamnésique « par lequel les participants indiquent la probabilité qu'ils se souviendront du matériel appris lors d'un test futur » (Double et al., 2018, p. 741).
Broader term: prospective confidence
Terme générique : confiance prospective
Related terms: metacognitive resolution, phi correlation coefficient, foresight bias, underconfidence-with-practice effect, memory reactivity effect, font size illusion, responsible remembering, procedural metamemory, metamemory expectancy illusion, delayed judgment of learning effect
Termes associés : résolution métacognitive, coefficient de corrélation phi, biais de prévision, effet de sous-confiance avec la pratique, effet de réactivité mnésique, illusion de la taille de la police de caractère, mémoire responsable, métamémoire procédurale, illusion métamnésique sur les attentes, effet du jugement d'apprentissage différé
Selected bibliography: Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027455 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Double, K. S., Birney, D. P., & Walker, S. A. (2018). A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning. Memory, 26(6), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1404111 [Study type: meta-analysis / Access: closed], Narens, L., Nelson, T. O., & Scheck, P. (2008). Memory monitoring and delayed JOL effect. In J. Dunlovsky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Hanbook of Metamemory and Memory. Psychology Press. [Study type: literature review / Access: closed], Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory : Pre-Judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9(1), 53‑69. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53 [Study type: empirical study / Access: closed], Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory. In J. Dunlosky & S.K.Tauber (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.4 [Study type: literature review / Access: closed]
Dataset citations: Fan, T. (2021, September 10). The Contribution of Metamemory Beliefs to the Font Size Effect on Judgments of Learning: Is Word Frequency a Moderating Factor? doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/D894V, Fukuda, K., Saito, J. M., & Kolisnyk, M. (2021, December 22). Judgments of Learning Reveal Conscious Access to Stimulus Memorability. https://osf.io/qrxs3/, Hu, X. (2020, April 15). Using Multilevel Mediation Model to Measure the Contribution of Beliefs to Judgments of Learning. https://osf.io/dsnj6/, Kelley, T., & Davis, T. (2020, November 20). Neural Evidence for Retrieval Attempts During Delayed Judgments of Learning. https://osf.io/a89tu/, Li, B. (2021, February 3). Soliciting Judgments of Forgetting Reactively Enhances Memory as Well as Making Judgments of Learning: Empirical and Meta-Analytic Tests. https://osf.io/6j9xf/, Mendes, P. S., Luna, K., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2020, June 2). Experience matters: Effects of (in)congruent prompts about word frequency on judgments of learning. https://osf.io/tkzph/, Mendes, P. S., Luna, K., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2020, September 30). Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs. https://osf.io/uyh9z/, Myers, S. J., Rhodes, M., & Hausman, H. E. (2019, November 2). Judgments of Learning (JOLs) Selectively Improve Memory Depending on the Type of Test. https://osf.io/ew5z2/, Putnam, A. L., DeSoto, K. A., Dehkes, P., Gilmore, G., & Deng, W. (2021, November 16). Are retrospective confidence ratings better predictors of future performance than judgments of learning? Experiment 3. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/VE6Y8, Tekin, E. (2021, February 26). The Effect of Delayed Judgments of Learning on Retention. https://osf.io/yaguz/, Undorf, M., Dr., S.-M. K. J., & Amaefule, C. O. (2020, January 29). The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning. https://osf.io/wp2xy/, Zimdahl, M. F., & Undorf, M. (2021, April 20). Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning (JOLs). https://osf.io/6jpcy/