JFK Assassination System Date: 5/28/201 Identification Form Agency Information AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: = 124-10219-10241 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILENUMBER: = 92-2914-301, 302, 303 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: DIRECTOR, FBI TO: SAC,PG TITLE: DATE: = 11/20/1963 PAGES: 5 SUBJECTS : GM, SMO, ASSOC, GAMBLING ACT, TAX FRAUD, EVASION, TRIAL, ATTEMPTS, JUROR DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: — Unclassified RESTRICTIONS: 4 CURRENT STATUS: — Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: = 07/22/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : INC A/T, RGM, NOTE fb v9. 13 | Docld:32297465 Page 1 ‘
ra . ¥ “4-3 (ReW."4<17-63) - é Tol aye r . é . *. os - a Cah wits *Belmon ” _4 & a raiel. (aa Cc AIRGRAM' c CABLEGRAM xxxRA DIO CoTELETYPE = ?=— Holmes } Sarees 11-19-63 D.LRECTOR, FROM SAC PITTSBURGH 1917.5 . te ANTIRACKETEERING GABRIEL MANNARINO, AKA, AR. SAMUEL MANNARINO,: AKA, ARE / ON NOVEMBER 18 LAST, SELECTION OF A JURY: WAS MADE AT COMMENCEMENT OF TRIAL OF MANNARINO BROTHERS AND THEIR assootaTes||_ ON CHARGES OF INCOME TAX FRAUD AND EVASION. 3+ OS CON NOVEMBER 18 LAST, PCI ANTHONY JOHN WISE, UR.» ADVISED SA THOMAS G. FORSYTH, 111, AS FOLLOWS: “ ON THAT DATE AT ABOUT 4:30 PM, SAM MANAIAR INO “STATED THEY | sooo TO TRY TO GET TO MRS BROWN, WIFE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUDGE* HOMER S$. BROWN, WHO HAD BEEN SELECTED TO THE JURY in 40 USDC, PITTSBURGH, THAT DAY. MANNARINO SAID THE BROWNS fian A. ~_ DAUGHTER WHO IS GOING WITH THE SON OF PAUL LONG, P| TTSBURGHS: RADIO AND TELEVISION NEWS COMMENTATOR, AND THE APPROACH WOULD a BE MADE THROUGH PAUL LONG. WHEN ASKED HOW HE KNEW dONG WOULD, GO FOR THE DEAL, MANNARINOG LAUGHINGLY SAID HE WAS POS ITIMESLONG WOULD GO FOR IT. IT #S NOTED THAT JUDGE BROWN AND HIS WIFES" MRS. WILLHELMINA B. BROWN, ARE OF THE NEGRO RACE AND THE PAUL LONG FAMILY IS CAUCASIAN. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN, i ar oF £ ; ey ~ ard ie gf fe FURNISHED TO USA GUSTAVE DIAMOND, PITTSBURGH, WHO WILL COMME NCE Ail PRESENTATION OF THE GOVERNMENT CASE AGAINST SUBJECT ON NOVEMBER ha INSTANT, ON CHARGES OF INCOME TAX EVASION. US DIAMOND -REQUESTE es, THAT NO ACTIVE INVESTIGATION BE MADE TO PROVE OR DISPROVE THE, . ¥ t ABOVE ALLEGATION AI TEAS. »TIME FOR FEAR OF JEOPARDIZING- THE CASE ORF OA ap ie avr fos 8: 40 NUY BZ 1963 KK “- ‘ vt oee el CO ' 1s ike Sinteltigénce convained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitably paraphrased in order'to<protect the Bureau’ s cryptographic systems. és, i a —_ pr Docld: 32297465 Page 2? Fa? DECODED Sey PEL
ae tele wee FD-36 (Rev. 1213-56) FBI - Date: 11/22/63 Transmit the following in : (Type in plain text or cede) Via AIRTEL (Priority or Method of Mailing) i To: Director, FBI (92-2914) (92-2918) From: SAC, Pittsburgh (92-236) (92-228) (P) GABRIEL MANNARINO, aka AR Subject: SAMUEL MANNARINO, aka AR OO - Pittsburgh Remyrad 11/19/63 and Buairtel 11/20/63. On 11/21/63, PCI ANTHONY JOHN WISE, Jr. advised SA THOMAS G. FORSYTH, III as follows: | On 11/20/63, SAM MANNARINO stated that the "contact" has been made with "Judge Brown's wife." MANNARINO did . not indicate that the results of the contact had been successful from his point of view and, in fact, appears to be deeply, worried about the outcome of the trial. MANNARINO | changed one part of his story in that he now referred to Judge BROWN's son going with the daughter of PAUL LONG, /} oh rather than BROWN's daughter going with LONG's son, as had IC been previously stated. _ g¢ eT The above information was furnished to USA GUSTAVE DIAMOND, Pittsburgh, Pa., on 11/21/63. The trial of the MANNARINOs in USDC, Pittsburgh, on income tax fraud and evasion charges, is estimated by USA DIAMOND to be about half over and may be concluded by 11/29/63. Although a report is slightly past due in each of the MANNARINO cases, Pittsburgh will, in the interest | carr og penne REC- 56 pn 29 oe, CG ME, sup recn's' SHOULD’ ‘BE CONSIDERED ARMED“AND DANGEROUS. » Bureau df LL, -xEROK EY Tae ) 20 NOY 25 1963 2... Pittsburgh ; - Are TIF Se ad Sent ____ lM Per ace deb of continuity, delay the reports until the conclusion Boe Docld: 32297465 Page 3