v9.1 AGENCY : RECORD NUMBER : RECORD SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : ORIGINATOR : FROM: TO: TITLE : DATE: PAGES: SUBJECTS : DOCUMENT TYPE : CLASSIFICATION : RESTRICTIONS : . CURRENT STATUS : DATE OF LAST REVIEW : OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENTS : Docld: 32298456 Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information FBI 124-10222-10232 HQ 92-2914-3RD NR 21 Document Information FBI . STICKLE, WILLIAM W. DIRECTOR, FBI 04/03/1958 9 SM, ARRESTED, GM, CONCEALED WEAPON PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT Unclassified 4 Redact 05/14/1998 INDEFINITE 12 Date: 5/28/201
Report Form ae : ; : . FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OFFICE OF ORIGIN PITTSBURGH REPORTING OFFICE CHICAGO TITLE OF CASE GABRIEL MANNARINO, Was.3 SAMUEL MANNARINO, Was. G-3-Sb /13 514, 25-27 33/13/58 REPORT MADE BY TYPED BY WILLIAM W. STICKLE ess CHARACTER OF CASE _ ANTI -RACKETEERI NG et SYNOPSIS: . ARTHUR F. SCHWARTZ, Chicago, interviewed and provided information ‘ :-about United Dryer Companies set forth herein, GREGORY GELDERMAN . furnished further information concerning United Dryer and displayed blank corporation record; he also provided some back- ground information concerning MILTON G., HAMMERGRAN, Continuing efforts to locate and interview BERTRAM B. DAVIDSON, SR., who | was described as an officer of National Filben Company. Neither SCHWARTZ nor GELDERMAN were aware of any MANNARINO or further Pittsburgh interests in United Dryer Companies. SAMUBL MANNARINO ARRESTED 1931 AS SUSPICIOUS PERSON AND FOR CARRYING CONCEALED — WEAPON, GABRIEL MANNARINO IS SATD TO CARRY SMALL CALIBER GUN ~ WHILE MAKING N COLLECTION. CONSEQUENTLY BOTH: “MANNARINOS “SHOULD BE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS . = P= DETATLS:- On February qk; 1958, Pittsburgh was advised that POT - FRED ANDERSON, was considered too. close to "ZEKE" WOLF, who — was contacted ‘by MANNARINO in January, 1958, to permit furthér” inquiry of ANDERSON in regard to the purpose of MANNARINO's visit APPROVED . SON CHANGE DO NOT WRITE IN SPACES BELOW | Bureau — | gl apy t aa | . “= PA tt: —__ 4-Blttsbureh 7 ) © 2 © 322236 . SOR REE TEL OeDWD 2=Buston . ns. nN 2- Springfield iv MAY 29 4958 U-Ghicago 455 : a 2 92— 38h, WAY 3 of ) 1958 Docld: 32298456 Page 2? - WRIGIBAL FILE Lb 99 = aE ~ 32 1
. to Chicago, However, ANDERSON said that MANNARINO ‘aid not make any ' purchase from WOLF during that trip. . On February 27> 1958, a ‘further inquiry concerning the officers and directors of the presumably defunct United ‘Dryer Corporation was made at Springfield by Chicago, which has not received. an answer to this inquiry as yet.. On February’: 2, 1958, ARTHUR F. SCHWARTZ, an attorney who , formerly had offices at 105 West Monroe, Chicago, and who i is now located in Room 500, Westminster Building, 110 South Dearborn ,' Chicago. SCHWARTZ is a partner of the law firm, ‘Silverman ,’ Blumenthal and Schwartz. . Re United Dryer Com any and United Dryer Sales and Service Company Chicago, illinois On February 25, 1958, ARTHUR F. SCHWARTZ advised that he had a former client by the name of OSCAR SCHULTZ, . whem he represented in the incorporation of a company called ‘United Dryer Sales and Service, Incorporated, SCHWARTZ oe advised that he was an incorporator of this company and also had been. Statutory Agent for it. SCHWARTZ said that he had |. represented OSCAR. SCHULTZ , a man who owned a car wash and who sso" been in. the coin operated machine business for ime: before SCHULTZ wanted to incorporate in order to handle the manufacture and sale of a small, hot air, drying machine. for use in washrooms , ete. ; SCHWARTZ advised that he thought that SCHULTZ had hold of a good idea and that he would be producing a good and saleable product in the 195221953 period, SCHWARTZ said he even got his partner, SILVERSTEIN, to agree to take their fees in the form of stock in the corporation, but SCHULTZ would not agree to this, SCHWARTZ advised it developed that the product was not so good; in fact, the dryer would not work, However, SCHWARTZ said that he had applied for and obtained an Tllinois Charter: for the United Dryer Corporation and all he and his partner could manage to collect out of it “was that they got their corporation costs from SCHULTZ, but he refused to pay them their fee, SCHWARTZ pointed out that. = Qo Docld: 32298456 Page 3