7 REPRODUCTION PROFICITED 2. Were the Cuban servic in eny agent capestty, or in > any other manner, before 2 eee 19532 3. What wes the reactica of the Cuben intelligence services to news is se of President Kennedy's assassination? To the news thet OSvALD was the sssassin? . 4. Was information on OSWALD’s visit to the Cuben Consulete in Mexico . City in Septenber, 1963, relayed to exy Cuban service? Ir. 80, whet action was teken? : 5. Was there any contact between the Cuben intelligence services ena the New Orleans’ Fair Play For Cuba Committee ?- Motor. 6. Has subject ever heard of Mario dex. ROSARIO Notine,or Pedro Charles . ‘mown also as "Peter"? - a ; Q a — T. How did the soviet offiictals in ‘contact with’ “the Cuben intelligence ae *. services: react to news..of ‘the. escessination? . .. 8. Did the Soviets propose eny “typa-oe ‘ection or investigetion to’ the wth Cuban intelligence services Following the news of President Kennedy's . assassination? . : 9. Was eny provocative material deliberetely fabricated by the Cdben | a services or others and sent to the United States to confuse the . investigation of the OGWALD case? 10. Was Jeck RUBENSTEIN ake, Sask RUBY know to the Cuben intelligence services? Tf so, in what way? Lb. Does subject imow a Gilberto LOPEZ who entered vextco on: Novenber’ 23, 1963 at Neuvo Laredo, Texes end four days later proceded to _ Havena by special plene. He was 23 years old end carried a ; 7s U.S. passport. He also had a Mexican. tourist permit. Develop . hy , all. information you ean on this individual. .. ; a which is sel?-explenatory for guidence of the’case officer. Under no circumstances should the contents of the letter be made known to the suo ject. fois information came.from the Secret Service and oa 12. Attached is a photograph of OSHALD, end « letter fron Havena ; : ”y : ree foe. } SR ead HW 53716 DocId: 32373009 Page 11
104-10268-10005 ‘REPRODUCTION " PROMIBITED + 2) dirieD “== eat TERNAL : 7 2s De Nt” “atta ae q secret | X. o ~ 2721 > hes be , wee [Nai May i964 | a a a TE . OFFICER'S | COMMENTS (Number ecch commen? fo show from whom INITIALS to whem, Drew 6 line ceross ‘column after cach comment.} |. - Decenert number OS 7 “age | for FOIA Review on . JUN 76 2 Ne <n ee INTERNAL”) UNCLASSIFIED” awh. + eee Gecirez (2 paar g of 212 COPY NO. _ HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 12
104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION  PROMIBITED BXAAZ-2ATLAND od il May 1964 . MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Plans SUBJECT: © AMMUG/1 Information on , Lee Harvey OSWALD 1, This memorandum ee and for action, The proposed lines of acti Gare ars in paragraph 4, Low, 2. AMMUG/1¢ ee nm InteNigence Service defector, has produced inkocttion of of tutex est to the President!s ‘ Commission on the sination of President Kennedy, CI Staff learned of AMMUG bar30 April, A questionnaire was submitted by the Staff on J y (Attachment A), Mr. Swenson, who is handling the AMMUG/1 debriefing, provided a reply on _ 5 May (Attachment B). It was clear from Mr, Swenson's | summary that AMMUG/1 had information bearing on the OSWALD relationship with the Cuban Embassy and Cuban i intelligence personnel in Mexico City, albiet his knowledge was not that of a direct participant in matters affecting _ ' _ OSWALD. A follow-up questionnaire was submitted to AMMUG/1 on 6 May (Attachment C). Mr. Swenson!s reply was dated 8 May {Attachment D), Attention is directed particularly to the content of paragraph two.of Attachment D, . 3, We have the problem of recouiciling the operational exploitation of AMMUG/1 and satisfying the responsibilities we have undertaken with Mr, Ranking’ AMMUG/1 is such an operational gold mine that-Mr... Swenson. wants, at a maximum, two months to work fully. - ‘This palpable, however, that we must furnish to the Comusission-the substance of AMMUG/ 1 's Document Number 627-395 ; for FOIA Review ch Jun 976 4 aS ek: rade - fiepReoueTiON - | ae snp 10 gp B12 — PRORIBITED tage 10 COPY Ho.. HW 53216 DocId:32373009 Page 13. . !
104-10268-10005 oO - REPRODUCTION information on OSWALD before't thaty On’ ‘the previous record of our association with the Commission, particularly with Mr. Rankin, - it seems possible for the Agency to: workout an arrangement with Mr, Rankin personally fiat ‘would take-care of their needs and ours after a frank discussions: the a eS. i 4, It is recommended that the DDP in person or via a designee, preferably the former, discuss the AMMUG/1. situation on a very restricted basis with Mr, Rankin at his - earliest convenience either at the Agency or at the Commission headquarters, Until this takes place, it is not desirable to put anything in writing. Raymond G, Rocca - Chief, CI Research and Analysis ‘ "Attachments “G /WH/6 (without atty C/WH/SA/CI (without, att) A8l-2SIYI- ae ty ae peer  o¢ 212 _ COPY NO. HW 53216 Bocld:32373009 Page 14
104-10268-10005 Papo . CcCiReS: ‘pace 12 oe Oiled. COPY NO. 7 HW 53216 Docld: 32373009 — Page 15
104-10268-10005 peevicusty mentioned, ‘ = Ve: HW 53216 DBocld:32373009 Page 16
- REPRODUCTION PRORISITED SUBJECT GeneraSSY DeSriating of AMMUG-1 2 _ Specific : The Oswald Case REFERENCE : Bund Memorandum dated 05 May 96 / lL. Reference is made toa telephone conversation yesterday oe, wa with Chief, CI Staff concerning this. matter. SS 2. Because I am not aware of the information already _ . 7 available to the Commission investigating the Cswald Case-or furnished by the Agency, my d debriafing of the Source has been based on the questions prepaid by tha CI Staff and on what the I shall be glad to pursue any 3. fp aor in addition to that in the” reference mi te; Doe co a. Luisa CALDERON, since she » réturned to Cuba, \ has been paid a regular salary by the DGI even though she has . not performed any services. Her home is in the Vedado section * where the rents are high. ~ b. Source has known CALDERON for several years, + Before going to Mexico, ‘she worked in the Ministry of Exterior ' Commerce in the department which was known as the fEmpresa Transimport".. Her title was Secretary General of the Communist a Youth in the department named in the previous sentence. . : aoe c. . Luisa CALDERON was Qransterred directly from her ‘position in the Ministry of Exfetia? Commerce toa post in Mexico, a matter of surprize to the genres. Rogelio nogiane Z Lopéa (DGI pseudo MORCOS), OT shortly before he left Cuba fo :Mexito on or "about 16 April 1964, --—- _ saw CALDERON. xr Q & ome G i ; 7 & . SSe 0 ee Ts oe —, ee fant _ Pipe Y ai : kK Ber DSF QYS COCLRE7 “pce 14 op 2 “COPY NO. ~ HW 53216 DBocld:32373009 Page 17
104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION PRORIBITEE 4. As explained to cl Staff’ Say publicity which would reveal the identity of the Source,, his. ‘etivities to KUBARK, or the extent of his knowledge! af DGhactivities. might prejudice the operationalwuse: of the. Source himself and of information which he his’ ‘provided. “Accordingly, it might be appropriate to paint: out to-the: Commission (as agreed by DC/WH/SA) thal KU BARK. ‘gpes, by using the Source, to obtain access to D&I pe el including those mentioned ~ in paragraph 3. above. oe . . . . Harold F.. Swenson. . Chief, WH/SA/CI te re ir em ee ree ee ee nF ene nee te Ape enn tr erp ere 20-2 HW 53216 DocId: 32373009 Page 16 “pace 15° of 212 COPY NO. |
104-10268-10005 6.May 1964 REFERENCE: 1. ~The source says that pr. 3963, Oswald visited the Guban Embassy in a ontwo or three occasions. It is public knowledge me during the period 9-26-63 te 10~3-63. A) When did source learn of these visits - before or after the assassination? Please describe In detail the cireumstances under which soures learned this Info tion and identities of the persons involved, Lo B) Did these visits take piste ‘daring the aforementioned period or is the source referzing to préxious visits. If the latter, try to get mors spec tite se eerie these trips 2 The source state bt ie. and after these visits Sap oGh ‘specifically Luisa ~ res and Rogelio RODRIGUEZ Lopez. This would appear to mean that one or more confacts were made after Oswald returned to the United States. | between 10-3-63 and 11-22-63, a) What does source mean by contact? , B) Canhe break down these contacts ‘by the specific Ine dividual named, place and SYP of contact, and. date of - occurence? C) Did Cswald know or have x reason to quspect the intelli goncs connections of these persons?” ' . . YD) What was the purpose of these contacts? HW 53216 DBocld:32373009 Page 19
104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION E) If Oswald did not know. the intelligence affl{tationa of these individuals, what protests, any) were employed in F) Did acurescever a see any documentary material on any of these contacts, or any correspondence initlated by or . ; i addressed to Oswald? . : G) Did the DGI ever employ physical purveiliances, , technical devices or camera equipment to cover these contacts. H) The source says he does not know guiether the Guban services used Oswald In any agent capacity or otherwise, This obviously makes It more tmportant to check out what the . . source meant in question one. 3. Did the DGI ever Initiate an tavestigation of Oswald? 4, What was the reasen for packaging files at DGI headquarters ; and fleid olfices after news of the assassination was received? | : 5. Souree was asked whether any provocative material was . : deliberately fabricated by the Cubans (Question 9) to confuse ‘ ‘ the investigation of Oswald, The raply attributed tohlmwas, . i "the only fabrication known Is the special matter by Fidel 7 CASTRO previously mentioned." Please clarify.. , . wZe  CCCLBSG COPY NO. + - HW 53716 DocId: 32373009 Page 20
-104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION PRONIBITED 08 May 1964 € GHLY MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Counter. Intelligence Staff Attention’ ‘Mr: > Rove SUBJECT General DesPetiag of AMMUC-1 7 | Specific : ~<the Oswald Case“ NG x Wy REFERENCE : find )émorandum dated 05 May 1964v e Memorandum dated 07 May 1964 ‘€. Conversations between cl Staff and C/WH/SA/CI 1. When the Oswald Case first was discussed with the ‘Source the specific questions prepared by CI. Staff were posed. The answers ‘ given by the Source were reported. in Reference A. That memorandum which I dictated to:a Cl Staff stenographer-appears accurate except for sentence 79 which should have:satd that the only possible "fabrication" known. by Source was the: specific denial by Fidel CASTRO, ona television program; “ot any Cuban knowledge of Oswald. 2. On 07 and 03° May 19647 further discussed the Oswald Case - with the Source in order to-elarify exactly what he knew and what he had heard. In the light of the explanation given by him, I believe that a clearer understanding of what he knows can be reached if I- record his knowledge without using the question and answer format. Accordingly, in the following paragraphs I shall report all the - information given by the Source paraphrasing his explanations and _ comments. ae " 1 have no personal smowledge Lee Harvey OSWALD or his. activities and I do not know thatOSWALD was an agent of the Direccion General de Intelligencia, (BGI) ox any other directorate or department of the Gaba Goperapent. OSWA: D after the assassination af President ya media carried the name of OSWALD. aS I first heard of Kennedy when Personnel in Brst. Commented about the case, so far as I can recall,. o a> lunch when a group of officers, of _ whom I was one, ‘weres Letting. The officers present were about. ten including Roberto SANTIESTEBAN, Norberto HERNANDEZ de Curbelo,. Andres’ ARMONA, _ Pedro FARINAS Diaz and ak YE K Adz. 27 3 “andr Aan Pee HW 53716 Docta:32373009 Page 21 pace +9. 18 of 212. COPY 30. _ —_—
"REPRODUCTION PROWISITED Manuel VEGA Perez. eA Perez previously had been assigned to Mexi¢6:in.the Cuban\Consulate where he was the principal intelligence officer: of the DG VEGA mentioned that OSWAED had\gone’ to the Cuban Consulate :, two or three asin connection with a visa application _ during the timestha Aw as in Mexico. I gathered, although I do not knd that VEGA made any specific. statement to this effect, that VEGA personally had seen OSWALD, I well could have reached this conclusion because normally VEGA and his assistant in Mexico for the DGI, Rogelio RODRIGUEZ Lopez, would see persons applying for a visa to go to Cuba. This is because DG officers are charged with expediting the granting of visas of agents of the DGI. Such agentgon appearing at the v! Consulate use a special phrase(to indicate their relationship y with the DGL (I do not know the-particular phrase used - in every case. Ido knowthat, agents from El Salvador in requesting visas always made mention of the name "Mauricia” ) . . The DGI officers 3 : ake Consulate’: interview visa applicants to 33 eerts, «TE the ‘visa applicant does not use c hrases.: ‘the DGi officers instead of granting the v mS Fenmetatony, tell the applicant to return in a few days. The ‘ffien notifies Habana and requests. — authority for the visa. ‘cannot recall if VEGA even made the statement that he had requested permission to issue a visa to. OSWALD, but I feel sure that he would have done so because VEGA. had said that OSWALD had returned several times and this would be the usual procedure. Sn | | { | | | I believe that Rogelio RODRIGOEZ Lopez also would have seen OSWALD because he worligd\with VEGA and also would have screened visa applicanté \S ROE , have had contact with Dea arch 1964, shortly before - ¥ made atrip to M SS that hoch been involved with an ae American in’ MexiexQF on to which I refer wastold —— to me by a DGI case Officer:nakied Norberto HERNANDEZ de a : F i 2) ex ane UB Gpaversation with HERNANDEZ HW 53216 Docld: 32373009 Page 22 COPY NO.
104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION PROMIBITED - because he gave me $40. ee Some shoes and | . other items during my (tiptoe Mexico.) I had commented to HERNARDSZ thatit seemed strange that Luisa CALDERON:was receiving a salary from ; ’ the DGI although be. apparently did not do any work ~ ! ** for the Services CE HERNANDBZ told me that hers was a peculiar Rhy that:tevhimself believed that she ; . _ had been ree d in: Mexico by the Central Intelligence - ' Agency alt gh Manuel’ PINEIRO, the Head of the DGI, _ @id not agree. As Kyecall, HERNANDEZ had investigated ‘Luisa CALDERON, This was because. during the time she was in Mexico, the DGI had intercepted a letter to ” . her by an American who signed his name as OWER (phonetic) or something similar. As you know, the pronunciation ° of Anglo-Saxon names is difficult in'Spanish so I am not - sure of how the name mentioned by HERNANDEZ should be . spelled. It could have been “"Howart I” or something different. As { understood the matter, “the letter from the American was a love letter but-fhdicated that: there was a clandestine- professional re lefonee between’ “the” writer and Luisa — CALDERON. cae stood from HERNANDEZ that after the rater Suptte hte latter she had been followed . . ee a es oes and seen in the compe an American. I do not know if this could have been ALD, I, myself, considered the i case of ‘Luisa CALDERON unusual because I had known her ne before she went to Mexico when she worked in the Ministry “ s of Exterior Commerce in the Empresa Transimport Department where she was Secretary General of Communist Youth. She was transferred directly from that position to a post in Mexico which seemed strange. The only other person about whom you asked me in connection OY ' with this, whom I recall, is Sylyig, DURAN and I know very . __ little about her. What happened Was that I was in the Cuban : | Embassy in Mexico on 23 Mapci&\J864-about 1230 in the afternoon | preparing to return to Habahathe sémeyay. 1 was talking to some: other Cubans inclaiing Rogelio RODRIGUEZ Lopez and fou BUENAVENTURA of th 3p Cuban Einbassy; a courier named ".  “Enio", a courier nxmed"Tato";. “and one other Cuban whom I cannot recall oot RBAW 2 pretty “girl standing at the on of ins (43 . pace 20 of 2h2_ COPY NO. _____. HW 53216 Docld: 32373009 Page 23
— - REPRODUCTION. PRORISITED i I recall that, after the xiewa:of” theagsassination of - President Kennedy reached the D6K-orders were issued for all offics of theDcr, ‘at Headquarters and in the field, to sort and pai alt'docuinents ‘according to whether they were muy gosto (e a her mecret). "secreto" (secret), or "importante" (imp The material, once packaged, | was to be held pending instructions. All travel by | DGI officers and all DGI pouches were suspended temporarily, In addition, I recall that DGI Headquarters personnel were instructed either to remain in the DGI Headquarters offices or to keep the DGI aware of their whereabouts so that they could be reached immediately. I do not know the reason for these measures but I believe it logical that they were issued. _ because of the possibility that the United State might take some type of action against Cuba and the DGI offices, As nearly as I can recall, we were able to unpackage DGI files and use them normally abort the 3rd éf December 1963."* . les 3. In brief, the Source does net aim to have any significant information concerning the assassination of: President Kennedy or Ay about the activities of OSWALD<°If the paraphrased comments of information on this matter. the Source are considered to _feeéfurt er.clarification, I suggest that : Mr. Rocca, who is most pan rail ce = sett the details of the OSWALD ao Case, talk to the Sour kevarranged at any time. Mean- — while, I shall have a a Sree at a LCFLUTTER to : determine whether or ni seems to have concealed any { "Harold F, Swenson -Chief, Wa/SA/CI C81 Re = Si HW 53716 DocId: 32373009 Page 24 a “PAGE 21 of 12 COPY NO. _ —___—_—
7 - REPRODUCTION PRORIBITED Oyen ED conbrSentiat ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET AP SECREL_ "} UNCLASSIFIED SUBJECT: (Optional) Chief, CI/R&A Oy {ore designation, number, ond he xP OMMENTS [Number cach comment to show from whom . - < L\ “}\ip whom, Oraw a line. ceross column citer each comment.) T think you will be particularly interested in para-- graph 3 of Mr, Dooley's memo of record, attached, Art went i over to wind up/loose end we had with regard to the AMMUG information we had previously furnished, Rock — alee for FOIA Review on. JUN 1976 SAME AS 95° ‘om Toa eT Co conFipentiaL =) UEFRNK, «] UNCLASSIFIED HW 53716 Docld: 32373009 Page 25 PAGE 22 22 or 212. cory NO. __ —_——_—— .
: — RRORIBITED SOURCE EVALUATION: ery reliable - We have -true. For &&3 xine we ina thdegondent ofthis, Source’ ne antel VEGA:Perez and Rogelio RODRIGUE : Sy Cuban intelligence ‘officers in Mexico. Se oo s SENSITIVE SMURCES. AMD mete Involve nie - COCt BGS * pats 23 of 212. COPY NO. HW 53216 DoclId: 32373009 Page 276
104-10268-10005 10 FROL ' SUBJ with a summacy of ; : no personal jnowledge of Oswald and no information linkiog him to i the Cuban intelligence services in any manner... i REPRODUCTION PROMIBITED 19 June 1964 y. Pay IRA, ene ve ANMUG- - Me. Reymond Gx Rocca” ato and Warrea) CGunissioy | : ox fen far Qe} with teluted docunents. . EERO NS ~ . i. : Lee Turvey OSUALDYS . i (201-289, 248) | : - | > Chick, CI/BA 3) on 15 May 1964, we provided the President's Commission ur debriefing of Cuban defector AUG 1 who had As a follov-up, . He. Howard P, Willens of the Commission. asked if he could see the questions us2d in the interrogation. — to the Comaission and. shoved: them to Mr. Wiltens. I took. the questions anid Source'’s respons?:s He studied then 2. On 18 June, ’ and returned the questions. to. me with thy- observation that they were | * very thorough and fully satisfied. his. eéquirenents. saw ao need tu pursue this ang b>: any “further. answers exhibited. to Mr. Willens\eare ettached. He said that he . The questions and At no tim: during | our contacts with th: Comaission did we disclose the source's Ldentity or cryptonyn. . ~ : up its investigation. to the egoncy personnel he nrofessionals." you. Attachment ; “Orig Beh - c/ct/Ren iat. . ee POTD HW 53216 DocId:32373009 il. Willens indicated thet the Commission wes winding He was highly complimentary of CIA, veferring encountered here and in Mexico as “real Mr. Willens asked that.{\convey his test regards to 3- a/s L ~ -CI/R8A/AEDooley ~ “hs crea /Chreno: ane “tadla if ; dectassiitcaios So. ORCAS pace 24° of212_ COPY HO. Page 27
HW 532716 — REPRODUCTION SRORIBITED WARNI NOTICE ra aoe Vee ai __ Meth it 2s INVOL' \ D RETEREHCi: Dubricfing of ge ELS L. ‘he source says that Yr tick ne ar 1953, Oswald visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico C 3 two or three occasions. It is public mowledge he vas in Wexico during the period 9-25-63 ‘to ‘ 10- 3-63. A) ‘When did source learn of these visits - before or after the assassination? Please describeain detail the circumstances under which source learned this Sets and identities of the persons involved. B) Did these visits dk “nee Saving the aforementiuncd: period or is th? source veferring: to. BE, vious visits. If the : | latter, try to gst or ‘ ; and the origin aes ‘gources Xs: intgrmation. : | 2. . ‘the sourea stato ie wtore,“during, end after these visits : Oswald vas in contact wa thothe Der, specifically Luisa’ : * CALDERON, Manuel VEGA "82 and Rogello RODRIGUEZ Lopez. This would app2ar to mean that one or more contacts were mada after Oavald returned to the United States i.«., between 10-3+53 and > 11-22-63. . A) hat dees scusce figan by contact? B) Can he birzak down these. contacts by th: specific individual named » Place and type of contact, and date of : occurrence ? : c) Did Oswald Imow or have reason to: suapett the int:lligence connections of these. persons? D) imat vas the puspose of these contacts? . 2 If Oswald did not: know “fhe. 4ntelligence ‘affiliations of thes2 individuals, what j pratexts , AP any, were employed in contacting hin? : met F) Did soucce evic see any ‘aoeuitén tery noteiial on. any or these conta:ts, of ony corres pendedic initiated by or a addressed - to Osuvatd? raed ayy ‘ey “ pects ee ea nn ees " ONCE SENSITIVE SMULC ES AMD J ALORS tavet ED y me See oh GOCL ASB Docld:32373009 Page 26
104-10268-10005 7 "REPRODUCTION OS - PROMIBITED SENSITIVE SO ‘ ah Shine . METHODS’ KES AND INVOLVED _ SurveiLlanses, > ar these contacts. technical devices ou “camera (equip: te ee iS he H) The source says 48 duis not: know whether the Cuban 3) services used Oswald it, ‘capacity or otherwise. this $0 check out what the scurce obviously makes it << meant in. questicna BIN & x~S . : 7 \ 3. bid the DOI var initiate an Snyostigation’ or Oswald? h, Vhet was the rzason for packaging files at DGI headquarters and field offices after news of the assassination was received? 5. Source was asked whether any provocative material was deliberately a ; fabricated by the Cubans (Question 9) to. confuse the invzstigation of Oswald. 2 veply attributed to him was, “the only febrication Know is the spccial matter by Fidel CASTRO previously méntioned.” Please clarify. y Addtndun 18 June with vetegenes to : : ‘the only possible febrisdtion: ‘nova by source was the sp:cific aenial by Fidel CASTRO on a TV Program ‘of any Cuban knowlvdge or Cewald. : . Wh RI Mi IG TE NCE ; BD HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 29
104-10268-1 0005 REPRODUCTION _PaMnPTED SENT Sune £9 Ban METHOUS YOU 5 May 1964 oo 4 Subject - General: Debrief{ae « of Cuban § ‘Specific: OS BEDCase :- Vag” NN ye S The source does not have ecPtaowteste of Lee Harvey OSWALD | or his activities but was abl®to provide items of interest based on Cuban intelligence officers assigned to the Direccion General De Inteligencia. The information appearing below was furnished by the source and is keyed to questions submitted. 1. Prior to October 1963, osu) isited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City on two or three, ecasions. Before, during and after these visits, OSWALD was jaScontact withthe Direccion General De Inteligencia (DGI), apecifiéally. with LaisaJC ALDERON,' Manuel VEGA Perez and Rogelieh RODRIGUE 2 Nopez. ; . x VEGA. wh era elligence pseudonym is MARCOS is the current Cuban‘IS “Mexico. Herecently has had a - tour of duty in Habana, priigr*to which he held the same post as. now as Cuban IS chief in Mexico. RODRIGUEZ is-a Cuban IS staff officer in Mexico. He has three Cuban intelligence pseudonyms, Eduardo, Casimiro and Jose Antonio. The precise relationship of Luisa CALDERON to the DGI is not clear. She spent about six months in Mexico from which she ; returned to Cuba early in 1964. _ 2. The source does not know whether or not the Cuban Services _used OSWALD in any agent capacity: ‘or other manner. 3. A. When news of the assassination 1 of President Kennedy ' reached the DGI, it caused much comment concerning the fact OSWALD had been in the Cuban Embassy in Mexico. In addition, _ orders were issued for all headquartérs and field officers of the . DGI to sort and package all documents according t to whether. me os ' Te ened HW 53216 Docld:32373009 Page 30
a : a aireD were ''Muy ‘secreto" (very seeret), "secrete « Seret), . and "importante" (important). TKée material Gnce packaged was to be ‘held pending further instrugtions. In: ‘addition, all travel by DGI officers and all DGI pou averse Reerees temporarily. . . \ B. When the news that O QD was the assassin reached the DGI, there was no immediate comment but, when Fidel CASTRO ’ spoke on television to deny Cuban involvement, there was considerable comment.concerning OSWALD's visit to the Cuban Embassy in Mexico. At this time VEGA, who has been mentioned previously, was in Cuba and commented to a group of DGI staff officers that OSWALD had come to the Cuban Embassy in Mexico to request a visa but had been refused. VEGA did not give any details and the subject was not pursued. 4. It is not known whether information on OSWALD's visit to the Cuban Consulate in Mexico in, . September 1963 was relayed to any Cuban service. _ ” 5.- It is not known if the Cuban intéiligence services had contact with the New Orleans! Fair Play for ‘Cuba Committee. 6. The only Molina who-is ‘recalled ig ''The Hook", the Cuban who was convicted in New ‘York City for the murder of a young girl during Lo. -- . a clash between two Cuban groups. The DGI staff officer who had been ‘ * in the United Nations in New York, SANTIEST ABAN traveled to Cuba with "The Hook'" and with another Cuban named ORIHUELA and upon i arrival in Cuba tried to obtain employment for both individuals. The a names Pedro Charles and Peter have no known significance. 7. The reaction of Soviet officials in contact with the Cuban intelli- ~ . gence services is not known. 8. Nothing is known about Soviet proposals following the news of President Kennedy's assassination. 9. The only fabrication known is the spécial matter by Fidel CASTRO previously mentioned. . 10. Nothing is known about Jack aUBENSTEIN aka Jack RUBY. . . Il. The name Gilberto LOPEZ is riot familiar but, ‘if he visited DGI headquarters, a photograph of him: possibly could be identified. lz. OSWALD's photo was seen in the newspapers but nothing is known about him other thea what appeared i in the press. at EY fs WARHI. be CE. SCHISM S 7 | HW 532716 DocId:32373009 Page 31
104-10268-10005 ~ REPRODUCTION / — Pra ITED Heidte 3  HOTICE iS 1. Was Lee Harvey QSWS;, before 23 Noversiie ‘t KS eS ‘ ; zZ. Were the cuBserer one OSWALD in any agent capacity, or in ; any other manner, BONS 23 November 1963? . 3. What was the reaction of the Cuban intelligence services to news of President Kennedy's assassination? To the news that OSWALD was the assassin? 4. Was information on OSWALD's visit to the Cuban Consulate‘in Mexico City in September 1963, relayed to any Cuban service? If so, what ot action was taken? . 5. Was there any contact between the Cuban intelligence se rvices. oad the New Orleans! Fair Play for Cuba Committee? 6. Has subject ever heard of Mario del ROSARIO Molina, or Pedro ad Charles known also as '"'Peter''? 7. How did the Soviet ial in contact ‘with the Ciban intelligence services react to, ew “bf the assassination? ~ 8. Did the Soviess punposeD aDy type of action or investigation to the Cuban intelligence services following the news of President Kennedy's . assassinatig . “4 ~ o¢gative material deliberately fabricated by the Cuban i x@and sent to the United States to confuse the investi font te OSWALD case? . ' 10. Was Jack RUBENSTEIN aka Jack RUBY known to the Cuban. ‘tnbelligence : services? If so, in what way? . ll. Does subject know a Gilberto LOPEZ who entered Mexico on November ' -23, 1963.at Neuvo Laredo, Texas and four days later proceded to. © Havana by special plane. He was 23 years old and carried a U.S. passport. He also had a ‘Mexican tourist permit. Develop all. information you can on this individual. aed cn coch ane Ret AVIS OS fiat Te, HOTICE wari BO HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 32
HW 53216 ‘104-10268-10005 12. REPRODUCTION a PROMIBITED “WAR 1S NCITICE SENSITIVE SOURLES AND” Ne SMETHODS Inner vet Attached is a. photograph of oswaLp, andy 3 letter from Havana : which is self-explanatory for. ‘guidance: “of th yé case officer. Under : no circumstances should the: ‘contents: of the letter be made known to the subject. FBI, _ WARNING NOTICE Sttd: DH DoclId: 32373009 Page 33
HW 53716 - Tn thereertieel 104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION oo PRORIGTED. Vascutve Pagiry COMMISSION ON CIA ACTUVITIES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Washington, Dc 20500 ‘of - : - , Y Nelson A. Rockefeller, a : David W. Belin, Chairman : : Executive Director C. Douglas Dillon. - John T. Connor . April 15, 1975 Erwin N.:Griswold Lane Kirkland Lyman L. Lemnitzer Ronald Reagan Edgar F, Shannon, Jr. ce 7 ay a “sak — ; - | —_ corr Ro NO. \ Mr. E. Henty: ae dorttnetGstesstacnse heir Centr: belligence Agency Washingkan, BES Dear Mr. Enos As you know, there have been allegations + that the CIA was involved in a plan to assassinate Fidel Castro. For the . purposes of this letter, we will assume that these allegations axe correct, and based upon this assumption z= would like to ‘know the answers to the following: questions: 1. pid anyone with the CIA tell any member. of the Warren Commission or any lawyer serving on the Warren Commission staff that such plans had been underway? If the answer is -yes, we would like to know what person or persons withthe Agency delivered said information, to whom it was delivered, when it was delivered, what specifically was told or’said, what. documents there are to support the answers to the fore- going questions, and what response, ‘ GE ‘any,-was received from. the Warren Commission=: If the Commission. was. not told about: | . this, why was it not.‘to2d and who made the decision not to -.deliver such information - to the Warren Commission? © Rane 2. There is evidence « Castro, prior to November 22, 1963, knew about the. ‘existenca/of such plans and the possible in- . ‘volvement of the U.S...Gdvernment. Did the CIA at any time prior to the completion of the Warren Commission investigation have — ‘any docurésits’ ox- other information indicating . that Castro may ' have k Vabout:sar ith plans? .If the answer is yes, would. you please f nish age with copies of all such documents and details of any such infprmation. 3, Several months prior to the assassination of: President Kennedy there TAD aSeoe of a public speech by Castro that was) EERE ES ih tH@ Associate Press: ‘where Y. Castro alluded 3 - of212 — ee ee eee ee ~e Docld: 32373009 Page 34
HW 53716 PROIBITED to possible assassination attempts on his life and possible retaliation. Wouf? you pkéase advise us if there is any evidence that aa ‘Associated Press report. may have appeared in any newspapérs:in thes “Uited States, including specifically . any newspapeny. iv Dallas or New Orleans. Would you also advise us ERY have: any other information of public state- ments of . ‘eader prior to November 22, 1963 indicating any awarens8s of géRessible assassination plots on the lives of Cuban scenes. 4. Would you please advise us if there is any information in CIA records to indicate that at any time prior to November 22, 1963,-any. foreign government or any foreign group was consider- ing a possible assassination.of any American leader. If so, — would. you please advise. us.of all details and also. advise us who.. in the United States Government outside the CIA was ad- vised of these plans or possibilities. 5. Prior to his death Lyndon Johnson supposedly. stated that. ‘ he believed that although there was no doubt: that Oswald ' killed Kennedy and Tippitt, nevertheless Oswald might“have | been a part of a conspiracy in rétaliation to possible United States assassination: attempts in Cuba. Would yow please advise us of any information in Agency files showing whether or not there was any communication to President Johnson of any possible plans involving the attempted assassinations of any Cuban leader and if the answer is-yes, also give. us all details involving this matter. . Sincerely yours, . A OO - pavid W. Belin a . & Executive Director Docld: 32373009 Page 35
HW 53216 PROUISITED KAAZ- 22907 _12 May 1964 1745. Pesiten or Daalia oo. SS Ane IQDP called me this afternoon, 12 May, to state that the indo hns received a telephone call from RANKIN regarding the Commission's desire to interview him at 1030 AM, Thursday. Mr. HOOVER is scheduled to appear at 9:00 onthat  .. morning. : 2. The DDP wishes to have from you a short but comprehensive memorandum which highlights the basic issues or positions entered into by the Agency in its dealings with the ~ Commission. For example, RANKIN indicated that the Commission . would wish to hear the Dire ctor's views as to low improvements might be made in protecting the President's life. . Further, ‘they will probably ask questions regarding the possibilities: that a con- spiracy existed. Such general questioning certainly necessitates _that the DCI be made aware of the positions taken during previous | BN interviews. I raised with Mr. HELMS the nature of the recent . information which you are processing which originated with the Ye — <7 sensitive WH source. I informed him that in your view. this would ‘ raise a number of new factors with the Commission, that it should ‘not go to the Commission prior to the Director's appearance unless we have first had some preliminary reaction or made sure that the Director is fully aware of its implications sirice it could well serve as the basis for detailed questioning. The DDP stated that he would review this carefully and made a decision as to. the question of timing. 3. Given the schedule,’ you will appreciate that the DDP. | will need a paper covering the above points as soon as’ possible. a Jae OF =i Document Number. bg4- 5 for FOSA Review on JUN, B76. 63 COPY ae oe “~ ae Docld: 32373009 Page 36
~ SPwoDUETIOR _ PAORIBITED It May 1964 404-10268-10005 = . (14 May 1964 ; pociment Number 095-302, A for FOIA Review on JUN i975 wot 2 es — “ en nrg onary ne oe . ‘ e ‘ sot * ' . e . . : . . ° : . , . i : : . an HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 37
104-10268-10005 ED Summary. Outline of any contact or association, direct or indirect, Harvey Oswald. This should be accompanied by Cc. the tabling of an affidavit signed by the Director and notarized. (TAB A) information in the posession 1 of the e Agéncy zeparding . Oswald's activinten eof the | { between the Central Intelligence Agency and Lee — = [ United States has been wade’ available to the cere rR a are hin sineteeumeenmannsinetianas | Commission through its staff, with which there has a . been close and frequent contacts since the inception '.¢. An interim pronouncement by the DCI on the ieee lntnicaanehatnincnioannae Aen problem.cf-conepizatorinl-reeponsibility fox Oswald's of the Commission's activities. (TAB B) Oo t i — og ea 7 ~ ne a a —. HW 53216 DocId:32373009 Page 38 .
AW 3352716 104-10268-10005 , ‘ activity. It is, suggested that. the DCI take the position & essences te aenennapetnteemcmnsernrane Ran oN oa \ | _— bene ce problem has been furnished to the Commission for evaluation and consideration in the framework of its total knowledge of the facts. The Agency, at the present time, is lacking any knowledge of recent information or documentation furnished by the Soviet Government to the Commission with: respect to Oswald's : activity in the Soviet Union.. (TAB “1 C . d, The DCI's suggestions for: improving policy and noe ” organization Gith respect to the personal security of the President. Certaimiteps relating strictly to the Agency's jurisdiction have already been suggested by memorandum. It is proposed that the Director now — make specific ‘suggestions involving legislation which would treat information bearing on the personal security of the President and, advisedly, other Federal officials . directly related to national security affairs ina mamier similar to what-currently exists by statute for special 7 Docld: 32373009 Page 39 NODUCTION IBiTED a NE ee ote
HW 53716 104-10268-10005 SERMON — PROMBITED DoclId: 32373009 REPRODUCTION PRONIITED AN nuclear material or weapons “nts ef uced to the United. States or manufactuxa therein. (EBS, ‘Atomic Weapons relationship to the aban Intelligence Service, a Substantive information of grave concern to grave concern to the security of sources and methods have been developed on both of these topics. The information and, in certain instances, knowledge with respect to acquisition has been made available on a highly-restricted basi’ to Mr. Rankin. and to certain elernents of, his staff, Itis : meneecEet recommended that the DCI not at eeapond. on the record to queries on ‘these: topics, He should suggest that all SS . eee euch "technical questions" be worked out in detail through the SE channels and proce i ; functioned very well -- we believe -~ between the Commission and particular yeaa, CIA components, (TAB. E) <p DTLALL ELC, oe ec 10° OO : pace J! 37 Page 40 212, ‘copy HO,
104-10268-10005 HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 41 -— feewonuCTION — PRORIBITED ( REPRODUCTION “game 38 e212 ~ COPY NO. © nee a Re "
104-10268-10005 . - aoe o NS . . . There have beenguihore’ andvallegations which began - - nat Wy) , immediately after the aseasa Nation which branded Oswald asa U.S. Government agent, In many instances, CIA has been named as his sponsor. The au : ship, geographical dispersion throughout the world, the tags! themes and the timing lend program. - & S _ As DCI, Mr. mcNys welcomes this appearance before. ( ‘the. Commission to make a categorical and unqualified denial of these unprincipled distortions of the historical and personal responsibilities for what was a dastardly and heizious act. ° In _ witness of this, the DCI. submits to the Commission an affidavit . which formalizes this statement. |The affidavit i is attached. | It is recommended that the. Der state concurrently, with this ‘action that he desires to draw the: Commission's attention to the | . ena _ WW 53216 Docld: 32373009 Page 42 "fact that the irresponsible charges. that‘ have been made, sponsored . “Date 39 EPRI " PROWIBITED conan es ee nnn _ 12
HW 53216 REPRODUCTION PRORIAITED e801 WiSbroader campaign against NSF American intelligence and, s curity components which has built _ 7 up momentumi over the past six years. " We have traced the sponsorship of that campaign directly to individuals and com- ponents within the Soviet police atate apparatus. Their un- | i scrupulous treatment of the Oswald case‘was neither new as a method nor a surprise a8 An occurrence. —_ ; .. OC . : Lf the DCI is challenged by anyone on. thie Commission . about the substance or: implication of. his affidavit, it.is recom- , mended that response be along the following lines: CLA is a democratic institution. The pet has incorporated in his affidavit the results of detailed and painstaking examination. qualification is EN raised with respect ‘to the mi he willingly cress ie ee woe le Retin even tee ee ee re cm te tte oe i Docld: 32373009 Page 43
104-10268-10005  *: | we atone —— 2 ean sone: wee eee i SOuN A. McCONE, being duly. sworn, deposes and’ saya that he ts we the Director of Central Intelligence, and that based on bis personal. --.". j knowledge of the affairs of the Central Intelligence Agency and on detailed inquiries he caused to be made by the officers within the Central Intelligence Agency who would have knowledge about any relationship Lee Harvey Oswald may have had with that Agency, he certifies that: 9 Lee Harvey Oawald was not an dyent, employee, or | informant of the Ceatral Intelligence’ ‘Agency: ; | , J j ; . the Agency never contacted: hin, interviewed him, talked with him, or received or solicited aay reports or _— _ {nformation from him, 2, sommunicatedwith him, directly (-. or - indirectly, in any pthe puaanery. ones "the Agency ndyer fades him any funds or money, - ox compensated him, direcg por indizectly, in any fashion; and Lee Harvey Oswald was never associated or connected, directly or indirectly, in any way whatsoever with the Agency. JOHN A. McCONE Subscribed and swornto this _._— day of | oo, 1964, before me, 3 Notary Public in and for the State of Virginia, by tho said JOHN A. McCONE, who is personally known to me and he duly acknowledged tg me the execution. of the foregoing instrument, _Notary Public | | | ' My com:ission expires . oe seen ue HW 53216 Docld:32373009 Page 44
— PROBIEITED ro ? Y | oo | RE a HW 532716 DBocld:32373009 Page 45
104-10268-10005 TAB B Nmngike, thes " Sr the activities, affiliations and associations of Os Copies of the reports and access to original data, in. specific in- stances, has been given to Commission representatives in’ accordance with the DCI's expres sed instruction from the "inception that the Agency place itself completely at the Commission's disposition, ~-REPROOUCTION = “RePuoDUCTION —— PRORIGITED | | Be IS MS Oe | ACI OGRNPERINTD <1 Cum eee on : . . Lome ee mene enya HW 53216 DBocld:32373009 Page 46
104-10268-10005 2 PROMIBITED toe . . , . vos . \ HW 53216 Docld: 32373009 Page 47
PRORIBITED TAB C . cf . toe a . . : . ot . ox 2 Ss” Commission's sap Oswald's possible eee with foreign sponsors be made available to the Commission, The DCI may state that he is gratified that his instructions have been carried out | diligently and promptly. a items of information , state which are pier te . charged with the Ber tomypance of what is euphemistically . referred to as executive action! .« but is, infact, charged _with assassination and sabotage. — HW 53216 DoclId:32373009 Page 46
HW 532716 104-10268-10005 REPRODUCTION 7 5 - PROGIBITED | fbn Mem ow se “~ iat -the .Gacme bor oo an aquestions | . i KGB), and related. questions » which would tend to establish’ - Oswald's associational link with Soviet intelligence as ™ "technical questions" and, therefore, beyond the scope of _. present testimony, Itis suggested. that he rest on the fact that the Commission has taken up these points. item-by-item with. the technical levels of the Agency and that the ultimate findings an an ' and evaluation can only he. determined by the Commission, . pongo eee neiese ee a a ee ery DocId: 32373009 Page 49 , : , \
104-10268-10005 CRT PAL Teg DET tiie TREES Sega "Pili fed Be | Bear 26 ge ANTE _ PRORIE BED HW 53216 Docld: 32373009 Page 450 . Poy my . woe : eo . . te : , . . . o a “i “PRORIBITED 7 ‘PAGE 41 ot ae “p12 mo cory xo. __
HW 53716 104-10268-10005 PePROOUCTIOR Pome EB Suggestions. for Improving Policy and’ Organization Regarding | , Pre resisental Security” Shion directly by letter. In its response, the Agency confined itself to elements relating to its statutory mission. a. The Secret Service, or Treasu Ys record with the Office of Central Reference : a : féFmal require-~ - aK ment for informati slating: to to Presidential security. threats to the President's security, .our experience showed that it would need a. specialized organizational component to handle that task within the Secret Service itself. - in direct touch with the Secret Service regarding the ge possible utilization byt that agency ‘of’ our experience in. ‘ machine data processing. ' . “Om the’ public record, itis SS ; “suggested that the DCI not repeat this detail. camer ee PROT DoclId: 32373009 Page 51 Specifically, it was suggested that: ec. The CIA reply also noted that ‘the Agency was : oo 48 COPY NO. 4 TAB D ‘| .- “cote Rh
HW 53716 104-10268-10005 tabled heretofore. ‘The Commission's major problem has been the assessment of personal motive and the relationship of an individual act to possible conspiratorial guidance. core of the problem, the DCI should point out the possibility of legislative action which might be an assistance in preventing: recurrence of the national calamity it is: investigating. ; advance information.  belating to Presidential security and the: problem faced by the county 2 a few years ago regarding the clandestine introduction or manufacture in the U.S. of special nuclear material or atomic weapons. time was embodied in the Atomic Weapons Reward Act of 15 July 1955 (29 Stat 365, PL. 165, 84th Congress). lished a substantial reward ($500, 000) for information bearing on ; the Act provided ‘by any person, and i in certain. instances privileged treatment for such persons -- for ‘example, ‘asylum i if they were - REPROOUETIN __ PROAIBITED | Docld: 32373009 Page 452 Because conspiracy is the is an analogy at close hand | between the problem of developing in a PRATER | ' : - c There The remedy devised at that In essence, the Act estab- ' PAGE 49, of. 212 copy NO. __
104-10268-10005 — lgpaeooueriar . recommendation for oxipinai‘idgialative action designed to induce individuals to furnish information bearing on Presidential . security by offering a substantial reward and preferential treatment, The DCI should assure the Commission-that he is convinced that the substantial award, the special treatment, and the publicity | | | i] which would attend the implementing legislation i in this matter could eopresent 2 a significant inducement even to staff officers —. a) and personnel of secretiasdactations and state security organs abroad whose functions include assassination and sabotage. I . is these individuals who would be privy to plans of executive action. ; The reward would.constitute additional inducement for such individuals to take the risk of making important disclosures. 7 The suggestion does not Sires the ‘material elements of xeward and special treatment. . The DCI can assure the Com- mission that we are aware that at personnel in police state apparatuses | charged with the assas sination and sabotage functions have repeatedly expres sed and, in many cases, acted upon their Fepugnance for ; : HW 53716 DocId: 32373009 "Page 53
HW 53716 104-10268-10005 There are specifiaeases, in’ ‘the past tenyeare which document this 9 asndztion, Teisted ge agonal ‘charged with assassination missions have abandoned the 9 iitaston even without the assurance or’ the inducement which the DCI is here proposing. In making this suggestion, ine DCI may go one step further in advising the Commission to suggest that the Commission examine the advisability of legislation making ita Federal offense to conspire and to ‘kill the Chief Executive. 3) The DCI could also | indicate that the Commission might desire to. Suggest that any uv legislation along these lines should be enlarged to include con~ spiracy to kill any Federal: étficial ia the President's personal’ circle of official associates directly concerned with national security affairs. (The Agency's Legal Counsel states that draft bills have been considered. on the Hill.) , DoclIda: 32373009 Page 54 | pace 51 1 COPY nO. . -  RlepRepuerioe | — | | |
XK. Lo. | uNTET-"AL SECURITY MANUAL SENATE - . ievise 86th Congress Doct int ane ; ¢ . a ‘ 2nd Session, No, PEDRODUCTICL pp 275-277 _. Act of July 16, 1955 (69 Stat 305, P.L.. 165, Sith. Gong.) —Atomie D ‘ Weapons Rewards Actof f953: wi 1g AS) : “Pe it enacted bythe Scuate and House of Expresentatives of the United Statc-of Aureric: in Congress assembled, That this Act may bo cited as.she ‘Acomis Weapons Rewards. Act of 1955%. *“Szc. 2. Any person whe snishes original information to the United States— Gr ee eae : “(a) leading to theinding or other acquisition by the Gnited Siates of any special nuclear materia] or atomic __ Weapon which has been introduced into the United States, or which has been manufactured or acquired therein contrary to the laws of the United States, or : -“(b)-with respect :to. an attempted: introduction into the United States or an attempted manufacture or acquisition in:of any special nuclear material or atomic weapon, . “é0n to the laws of the United States, . she bu toirated by the payment of an amount not to exceed + 500,000. ; . : , “Sec. 3, An Awards Board consisting of the Secretary of tho Treasury (who shall bo the Chairman), the Secretary of Defen tho Attorney General, the Director of Central Intelligence, and of onc member of the Atomic Energy Commission designated by that Commission, shal! determine whether any person “fur- nishing information to the United States is entitled to any C ne : award and the nmount thereof to be paid pursuant to section 104-10268-10005 2 In determining whether any person furnishing informa- tion to tho United States is. entitled to ‘an award and tho amount of such award, the Board. shall take into” consid- “(a) whether or not tho information is of the type specified in section 2, an _ . “¢b) whether the person furnishing tho information was . . an officer or employee of the United States and, if so, whether the furnishing of such information was‘in the lino of duty of : . that person. : ; : co ; “Any reward of $50,000 or more shall bo approved by tho _: : President. . ; a wo : “Sie. 4. Ifthe information leading to an award under section 3 is furnished by an-alien, the: Secretary of State, the Attorney — General, and the Director.of Central Intelligence, acting jointly, may determine that the entry of sucht alien into the United States isin the public interest and, in that event, such alien and the mem- - bers of his immediate familymay receive immigrant visas and = | may bo admitted to the United States for permanent residence, - notwithstanding the requirements of tho Immigration and No- tionality Act. ; - ' “Sec. 5. Tho Board established under scction 3 is authorized te hold such hearings and make, promulmate, issue, rescind, and amend such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act. oo, : ; a G. Any awards eranted under section 3 of this Act shall - bo certified by the Awards Board and, together with the approval of the President in those cases where such approval is required, transmitted to the Director of Central Intelligence for payment out of-funds approprinted or. available for the administration of 1 eter eecmmmete enema ne Pe rete aH ( ne the National Security Act of 1947, as amended. _ ‘= ‘ : “Sec.7. As used in this Act— : - - “(a) The term ‘atomic enerzy’? means all forms of energy re- leased in the course of nuclear fission or nuclear transformation. - “(b) The term ‘atomie weapon’ menns any device utilizing atoniic enercy, exclusive of the means for transporting or pro- . pelling the device (where such meanis is a separable and divisible “' part of tho device), the principal purpose of which is-for uso as, !° or for development of, a weapon,.a weapon prototyps, or a weapon "."(e) Tho term ‘special nuclear material’ means plutonium, or uranium enriched in the isotope. 233 or. in the isotope 235, or any : | . . - other inaterial which is fourid to be special nuclear material pur- oo . ot ae ot Suant to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Actof 1054. 2. ne a od) The tarm ‘United States,’ when used in a geographical: ( * sense, includes Puerto Rico, all ‘Territories and possessions of the” -. : qo United States-and the Canal Zone; except that in section 4, the | ct ° ‘term ‘United States’ when'so used shall have the meaning given: < ot ; “:*, toitin the Inimigration and Nationality Act.” vo : meee or seg we OR ee et Se ee te net hie Cece tet t HW 53216 Docld:32373009 Page 55
404-10268-10005 PRONTO - POREETED. HW 53216 DocIw: 32373009 Page 56 ;