JFK Assassination System ; Date: 7/22/201 Identification Form Agency Information Peleased under the John Kennedy AGENCY: DOS ; Wssassination Records RECORD NUMBER : 179-40007-10320 ollection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). RECORD SERIES: LOT 85D275: RECORDS RELATING TO LEE HARVEY OSWALD Fase#:NWU 54653 Date: wO-235-2017 AGENCY FILE NUMBER : Document Information ORIGINATOR: DOS , FROM: SCA TO: FRANCIS, ROBERT TITLE: DATE: — 11/23/1964 PAGES: 17 SUBJECTS : WARREN REPORT SUBJECT MATTER IN JURISDICTION OF SCA DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION : — Unclassified » RESTRICTIONS: —1C; 5 CURRENT STATUS: — Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENTS : FOLDER: PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF REPORT; BOX 002 v9.1 1 HW 54653 DBocld:322127672 Page 1
HW 54653 ye /‘DEPARTMEN T OF STATE iz ADM IN {STRATOR - Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs  QONPIDENTIAL * a | HG ote NENORANDUM TORY Mr. Robert Francis, Warren Report Task Force, FROM: SCA : oe a Poo ts, . un ee, ‘sme: Aspects. of Warren-Report Subject Matter Within, Jurisdiction of SCA” Ie DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS PERSONS Ay “EBL Requests for Information on Travel of "Subveraives" asioad _ Requests by the FBI for information on the - foreign travel, of . American "subversives" are received in the Department by INR.: The .. INR/DDC memorandum to the Task Force dated November 4, 1964, ° : describes’ as follows the routing of the FBI request to PPT and oO possibly also to SCA, the dispatch of an appropriate notice ta: ‘the | - field by PPT, and the routing of any information received from’ ‘the _‘fleld. in xeply:. oo 2 , "Forma | memo ‘ftom EBI-M, Hoover to INR-Mr ; Hughes tndd eave that an individual intends to travel abroad. _ The Bureaw want information,’ aa mo "In the case of significant ‘travelers, a ‘ eépy is made inc ‘mediately available’ to SCA-Mr, Schwartz and: the country desk fine’. volved, ‘(If necessary, either INR/DDC~Mr. Ekern or Mr; MacDonald should be advised of the travel notice. o) SCA will note, and pass” to -PPL/LS for actions . +f ye: the travel is of no apparent significance, copies should 80 direct” to, Per /LS and the. desk involved. =. © "In any case, ‘PPL/LS will? send appropriate notice to the” - field, sending INR a duplicate COPY e (“TPS copy should be. given ‘to! country dea analyst, _ "T¢ information comes ‘in. from the field, PPL/LS will send ap two copies, One copy will be. given’ to, INR/DDC for handling to the FBI, or, if urgent, hand-carried. or alert. telephone. call will be made, The second Copy will be- incorporated in the. tndt cos viduals nao file. . a ae ae be, : Ig not indicated otherwise, a copy wil go to ‘ra/ppe/c1, a. af * GROUP. L: an po pe ets ele! Excluded from automatic downgrading and “declasetttcation. © ce! | CONFIDENETAL, DoclId: 3227127672 Page 2? eet eee am,
| I. | \ t i | | | |. h HW 54653  CONFEDENTTAL ig . Within SCA, the routing of the ‘outgoing notice by which PPL asks the posts to advise.concerning the "subversive" person's activities abroad, and of any. incoming reports in reply, has been subject since . August 27, 1964; to the following rules: 1. Two copies of any outgoing message are to be routed ‘by the action officer in PPI/LS to INR/DDC and one copy to SCA, 2. With respect to incoming reports of this nature from ‘posts abroad which indicate that they have not been sent to INR/DDC and SCA, PPT is to take immeidate action to see that such messages ‘are routed to INR/DDC and SCA, - . 3. With respect to any incoming reports from the posts, they . will be transmitted to FBI by INR/DDC and not by PPT, because of . ~ the coordinating responsibility of INR/DDC with.respect to this. , type of activity, ae oo ce oo, Under the procedure that prevailed prior to August 27, 1964, it appears that INR was generally not on distrubution of such messages. being dispatched or: received by PPT, and that SCA was not always. on distribution of them either, “At present, however, the distribution for all outgoing airgrams includeg SCA, INR and the FBI, and hence these same offices will normally be on distribution ' for the incoming replies as well, However, offices on distribution | for the outgoing message will automatically be on distribution for . the incoming one as well only if the incoming message refers by number to the outgoing one; where this is not done, RM/R reports that it assumes no responsibility for routing the incoming message to the same offices that saw the outgoing one, To close this loop~ hole, it is recommneded that PPT be instructed to include in its . airgrams to the field an éxpress statement that any replies should refer by number to the outgoing request, PPT has already been in~ structed to check the routing’on all incoming messages of this nature and make sure that it includes INR/DDC and SCA, and PPI reports tha t this is being done,. So . o B, ,Information Concerning Repatriation Loans _ 1. The Lookout File in the Passport Office The fact that an unpaid repatriation loan is outstanding’ in the name of an American citizen will cause the Passport Office to deny that citizen's application for a new or renewed passport. With citizens who have unpaid repatriation loans, as, also with , those who have renounced or attempted to renounce their American . nationality or have otherwise evidenced disaffection with the  — United States, and with those whose files’ contain other reasons re  . . that would: cause vets ; ot naw i 0 GONPEMENTIAL DoclId: 3227127672 Page 3
——+. HW 54653 that would cause them ta be denied the routine issuance of a. " passport -- in all ‘such ‘its "Lookout File" to bring the difficulty to passport is issued, A description of the "Lookout File" is attached to this memorandum as Attachment A, ae 2. Operation of ‘the Lookout File with Res ect to Re atri tion Loan Notices ne Volume 7 Foreign Affairs Manual, Section 423 sets forth the criteria and procedures the repatriation of dest In general, Foreign Service Posts are authorized te grant such loans where (1) It: hardship and no other so 'is in or is the cause of of the United States, | The Office of Special Consular Services of the Department | must approve jor. obtain the approval. of/all: repatriation loang. note, which includes <a 5 be furnished a passport liquidated, Force, As the means of not of the loan the Office o Section of the Passport coded and punched with a and place of birth, ete matic Data Processing Office,’ The cards are accompanied by a Meting — of the particulars, yoy we ‘ m Pee Ne er BE 7 Sn Ea rye meareen cinyeeenh ly  eapu Fi nen rng ett tt eT DoclId: 3227127672 Page 4 ~~" When the loan 48° granted the recipient executes a promiasory st8 have been instructed by Circular Airgram to include the date and place of birth of the recipient on both the promissory note and the application for financial assistance, This information is forwarded to the Office of Finance of the Dea partment. See the memorandum on "United States Government's -- Repatriation Loan Program" dated November 4, 1964, from OF:ACD/RR to OF:ACD, which has been circulated among members of the Task i “CONFIDENTIAL ey a 4 cases, the. Passport Office relies upon - light before a new ay as for granting financial assistance loang for itute United States nationala, iq shown the national will suffer undue urce of funds is. available; or (2) he. 4 gituation damaging to the prestige a tatement that. he understands he will not for travel abroad until his obligation ia - ifying the Passport Office of the extension f Finance. hand delivers to the Glearance Office an IBM (Lookout) card (Form 5081) .. 1l the pertinent particulars - name, date., ~. placed thereon. by the Department's Auto- 2 The clearance section. way . pi ee a, i hs i i eat! ae i o> Y
CONFIDENTIAL = ly The Clearance Section of the Passport Office immediately inserts the card in the Lookout File. In addition, a form (Lookout Sheet) giving all the particulars of the loan and the date the card was inserted in the Lookout File, is placed in the individual's passport folder or if none exists then in the - current name file of the Passport Office, When a repatriation loan has been repaid the Office of Finance prepares a list showing the name, date and place of birth ly the amount of the loan and the date of its liquidation, This’ list is forwarded to the Clearance Section of the Passport Office, This Section then removes the IBM card (Form No, 5081) from the Lookout File, A notation ig made on the card that the loan has been repaid and the date the notice of such action was received in the Passport Office. This card is then incorporated into the individuals passport folder. SCA is prepared to make available to the Task Force as supple- ments to this. memorandum, if they should be desired, copies of: . the following items: OO, Ss 1) Instruction 2300.3, issued by the Passport Office on February 20, 1964, establishing responsibilities and prescribing procedures for the operation and maintenance of the Lookout File; i141) Attachment 1 to Instruction 2300.3, supra, covering the preparation of Lookout Cards; 7 mc 1ii) Attachment 2 to Instruction 2300.3, supra, describing the manner in which a passport application is cleared against - the Lookout File, a : 3. Deficiencies Noted in the Oswald Case Corrected i ; The Report of the Warren Commission states that "The opera~ _ tion of the ‘lookout card' system in the Department of State was obviously deficient...." These deficiencies were evidenced by the facts that: (1) no lookout card was in the file during the | period when Oswald's citizenship was in doubt; (2) no lookout. , card was in the file during the period when the repatriation i. a loan had been granted to him and remained. unpaid; and (3) a pere manent lookout card should have been in the file characterizing .. Oswald as a 'defector'’, :  ~ 7 7 The correction of deficiencies (1) and (3), relating-to°.. doubt ful citizenship and the "defector" characterization, will be | re a discussed in the next — fe 8 CONFIDENTIAL HW 54653 DBocld:32217672 Page 5
= ee SS eh Se a Sa AEE RS ET , wo. : 4 ‘ in deh r Bee a ye Fg CONFIDENTIAL - Se discussed in the next section of this. émorandum, relating to ee it _ notice of disaffected Americans oad. The second deficiency, °° B with regard to the absence of 4 lookout card in connection with © _ a an unpaid repatriation loan has been corrécted, In the Oswald _ fs: case, the Passport Office did not prepare a lookout card’ on the’ an repatriation loan because Oswald's date of birth was not among , ee . the information furnished to the office by ACD/RR in the Office. be °° of Finance. .On April 16, 1964, however, the Office of Finance’: i issued instructions to all Diplomatic and Consular posts abroad |. : to provide the complete name, date, and place of birth of an indi- . vidual applying fora repatriation loan, The Office of Finance. - accordingly supplies this information to the Passport. Office, ‘and the Passport Office is able to prepare and post an appropriate —— lookout card, The information supplied to PPT by OF does not jy. Py eee oy SPS, SL ty SPER: SP te et Sc teaeeeass - pet a however, include the date the loan was granted, It is thug 925. a impossible at present to determine whether there is an undue deday =. ar in getting the notice of the loan to PPT, Mr. Reeley of ACD/RR le reports that it would be easy étough to include the date of the ° loan in the information supplied, It is recommended that this. be .\ << | Ee done. - we an ‘ mt ws ae 4 vey PERS Bs Ft rest ee, eet C, Information. Concernin Disaffected Americans Abroad reat SCA defines the category of "disaffected Americans abroad" - as including those who have renounced or attempted to renounce _ their American citizenship, those whoa have defected to a Come: ° munist-dominated country, and those who have in any other manner given evidence of disaffection with or hostility to the United.” - “1. Reporting of Such Cases by Posts Abroad The Foreign Affairs Manual, apparently contains two reporting, _ requirements applicable to cases of disaffected Americans abroad. . 11 FAM 938, as revised May.15, 1964, which is attached to the memorandum submitted to thé:Task Force by INR, dated November -4,: ae 1964, on the subject of "INR/DDC Procedure for the Handling of — Intelligence on Disaffected U.S. Citizens Abroad," reade as. follows: Oo , = "938 Federal Bureau of Investi ation a "938.1 Disaffection of U.S. Citizens Abroad Oe, The Federal Bureau of Investigation has a continuing interat ° in U.S. citizens who travel abroad, particularly to Sino-Soviet -Bloc countries, or Cuba or Yugoslavia,.and who, by their actions and/or’ statements while abroad, indicate a disaffection for the United: I , ° States, While the Bureau's responsibilities do not include in-” ' -quiries into the activities of such, persons while they ate ‘abroad, it’ does have an interest in certain of these individuals when they . Yeturn to the U.S... ° je: . ee ee - "938.2 Re orting Requirement ne 2 2 re em Overseas posts shall submit the following infoxmation to. the ©... ee Be oS CONFIDENTIAL | HW 54653 DBocld:32217672 Page 6
| HW 54653 they return to the U.S.; -executy € 6a shall submit a statement that the seriousness. : also be reported," A copy of the text of the Proposed amendment ' is attached to this memorandum as Attachment Be. | adequate and should be revised, and SCA is taking steps to have . ‘threat to the internal security if and when: ! . ~U.S.," and if the “possibility has. ariseri of their "return on, ‘GONFIDENT TAL oe Department by airgram « on Ue Se. ‘citizens abroad; a. Information concerning U.S, citizens who are approached by foreign intelligence agencies while abroad; b. Information on U.$,. citizens described in section 938.1 who might constitute a threat to’ ‘the internal security if and when c. Information concerning the return or intent to return’ to the U.S, “of ~persons - who, by their statements and/or actions while abroad, indicate: () A desire to renounce U.S. “citizenship; oO (2) A desire to seek citizenship in any of. the countries a mentioned in section 938.1; a (3) A repudiation of or antipathy for the United States; ot (4) An intent to remain in any of the countries mentioned ‘in section 938.1 for an extended period because of a | Preference for the communist - systems” is amending The Passport Office meanwhile, , Speses -Eo~ ~emend. 8 FAM 225 requirement to the effect that, when a U By citizen has com leted the procedure required to renounce his nationality, "the officer and consequences of the act were explained to the renunciant before a the oath was administered, Any pertinent facts or circumstances having a bearing on the renunciation and reasons therefore should SCA believes that both these reporting requirements are in= that done in the case of ‘8 FAM 225.6. The difficulty with INR's requirement in 11 FAM 938 is that it does not caver all disaffected Americans abroad as such, "While 938.1 states that the FBI ig. interested in all such cases, the actual reporting requirement, embodied in 938.2,,ts: applicable to disaffected. Americans in only two circumstances: “4€ they?re persons "who might constitute a hey return to. the intent to return to the U.S." SCA believes*the reporting requirement should be applicable to all Americans abroad who fall within 938.1 or, more specifically, within categories (1), (2), (3), or (4): of 938.2(c), whether or not the reporting officer judges that they might constitute a threat to the internal security/E d when they. return to the United States, and whether or not they have indicated an intention to return, It would seem obvious us that/comprehensive, unqualified, and unequivocal requirement of the type suggested is more consistent with the Task Force's objective of closing all loopholes ‘than is the requirement as | Presently Morded, Moreover , white the interest ).. CONFIDENTIAL: Docld: 3227127672 Page 7
EES Eg SE TOSI TSS RRR SPSS ALS EO A RO re aides eet eee ra _while the interest of the FBI in disaffected Americans abroad may be limited by the FBI's jurisdiction to the possibility of a threat . to the nation's. internal security, this is not tre of such agencies | _ as the CIA, Indeed, Director McCone is said to have testified to oo . . the Warren Commission, in testimony not yet officially released but oe leaked to the press, that. the CIA is definitely interested in all - reports concerning disaffected Americans abroad, and that it relies | eo -upon the State Department to report such information as it has on’. , ' Such cases, So far as SCA is concerned, it might be argued that our interest is satisfied by the reporting requirement which becomes : applicable as'soon as the "disaffected" citizen indicates an intent - to return to. the United States, since he will not be applying -for'a : passport again until after he does return, But, in the interest of “ § closing all loopholes and minimizing the possible effect of human - ee error, we believe it desirable that a report be required from the -— - field, so that the Passport Office may post a lookout card and ‘other... i appropriate. action: may be taken, as soon as it comes to the atten- ce a tion of a post abroad that, the citizen:is in fact "disaffected," , Also, failure to report at the actual time of "disaffection" may | . mean that the eftizen’s disaffection is unknown to the acting of-. 'fictals at a time when he subsequent ly applies for a repatriation _ loan; he may, for example, apply for such a loan at a different _ post, or to a different official, from the one who originally became aware of his disaffection, SCA recommends, then,.that the reporting requirement in 11 FAM 938.2 be expanded to apply when-. .. ever a U.S. citizen has evidenced "disaffection" within any of the’ categories of 938.2(c), or in any other ways mys meee SN I gays Spee 2 3 é Plage PE ee There then arises the question of distribution of the informa= tion on disaffected Americans abroad after it comes in to the De- partment, SCA believes that it should’ be on distribution for such’ material, both for the purpose of having. a lookout card posted in the Passport Office, and for the purpose of initiating‘a file in the Office of Speical Consular Sérvices in ca8e the disaffected person oom. Bhould subsequently change his mind and apply for a repatriation poe loan. SCA is accordingly concerned that the November 4, 1964: | memorandum submitted to the’ Task Force by INR, and referred ta: i Po, _ g~ above, does not indicate’ that SCA is included among the “appropriate ~ fe offices and agencies" that. are on distribution, for such incoming information, | re oe re Bie PERO Ticker secrecy are She inge! With respect to the reporting requirement in 8 FAM 225.6, SCA “ "is similarly concerned that this appears to apply only to an actually: completed renunciation of citizenship. SCA believes that it should © be amended to apply clearly’ to any attemptéd renunciation and to..any ce ; indication : that the person is contemplating or desires to renounce i ; his citizenship, (This ‘is the: language used by PPT in Instrucjtion V°°2560.2, the purpose of which is "to establish procedures for the pro cessing of cases of pergons who have renounced United States nas Po. ttonality or who have expressed adesire . . ih ee ee CONFIDENTIAL ci cee oe HW 54653 DBocld:32217672 Page 6
eS "| emeesgemuttisn tc OEE eat BE ep? re oe Eo ee CET E . a, ~ CONFIDENTIAL a a desire to renounce. suck nationality " (1talics added). ‘26 Receipt iand Treatment within SCA of Information « on Disaffected Americans Abroad: As stated in. the preceding section, SCA believes ‘that te should be on distribution for all incoming information as to dise - affected Americans abroad, go that lookout cards may be posted.’ in the Passport Office and/ file initiated in the Office of. Special Consular Services looking toward a: possible application for a repatriation loan. : With regard to pergons who have renounced 1 their citizenship. or indicated an intention of doing so, the Passport Office's pro- cedure for preparing a lookout card and otherwise processing the. case is governed by Instruction 2560.2, issued by the Office on November 6, 1984 which is attached ta this memorandum as Attache . ment - Ge: - . . vo aS In accordance with ghe ‘remarks made above with. respect: to” _ the reporting requirements, SCA believes that this Instruction. is similarly inadequate in scope and’ is taking steps to have it. revised, It should cover, and should require the preparation -of lookout cards with respect to, not only "persons who have - renounced United States nationality or who have expressed a de- ‘sire to renounce such nationlity," but also persons who have become defectors, or have otherwise indicated disaffection with the United - States, without forma e) wo.  £feLency, int e Oswald'c BE" of failure ‘to havea Tookout. card. in {the file during the period when Oswald's citizenship wag in doubt, the Instruction would seem even in its present form to close that loophole, for it does require the preparation of a card in any | case where an Ameriean has renounced his citizenship ox attempted to do so. a . L The third deficiency, involving. the absence of a | permanent lookout card on Oswald as a "defector," has also been remedied. At the time of the Oswald case the Passport Office did not © m4in- tain a separate classification within the lookout file of "dew: Co fectorgs." Now, however, ‘pursuant to direction by the Administra= | Oo , tor ofzSCA in March of 1964, the Passport Office does keep current lookout cards on. "deféetars ." To, assure that the file is complete, the names of all defectors and ré-defectors known to the Military have beén obtained and furnished to the Passport Office and are now covered by lookout cards, as are non-military defectors, and the Passport Office has been instructed to keep the curds current on the basis of. information, furnished. SCA by. the military and the intelligence agencies. ‘Again, however , it appears, that Inatruetion . on 1 rs cit ay Fa 2560. 2 As inadequate “) CONFIDENTIAL | S eee anertee HW 54653 DBocld:32217672 Page 9
~~ ' © . . soe . . . ’ + . oh . r . . . . . . 1 . . ae . . . . - . . * ‘ . - CONFIDENTIAL —— ee 2560.2. 18 tnadequate to cover this function of the Pasaport Office, For not only doeg it not apply to defectors as Buch, but it speaks only of "receipt of information from a Foreign Service post," with no indication that the information may come through SCA from the military or intelligence agencies ~~ or that it thay come through INR under the expanded reporting requirement of 11 FAM 938 as proposed above,. . oS Finally, it should be noted that, as the Administrator. of. SCA informed the Secretary on September 28, 1964, dissemination of information to the intelligence agencies during the period’ of the Oswald case <= information on Oswald's citizenship status, return to the United States, etc, -- was performed by the Passport Office, Early in 1963 the Deputy Under Secretary for Administra- tion and the Administrator, SCA, determined that all liaison with the intelligence agencies: should be conducted through INR, Since then all information concerning defectors which comes to the attene tion of the Passport Office; is brought. to the attention of the. Administrator, SCA, whose office forwards it to the Director of: INR for appropriate dissemination. oo " ' - “IT. LAW AND POLICY AS TO EXPATRIATION AND REPATRIATION OF. DISAFFECTED AMERICAN CITIZENS ‘ vo Do A. Expatriation of, A United States citizen may lose his nationality by per forme ing any one of the expatriating acts described in the subsections to Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ° (to the extent that these provisions have not been held unconstitue . tional by the Supreme Court), It would appear that only two of oo those acts «- formal renunciation of nationality under sec, 349(a) (6) _—_ and oath of allegiance to a foreign state under sec. 349(a)(2) =2.-" -are relevant here, however, for they are the only two that_were a .@ven arguably involved in the Oswald case, and they are also the: .° only two that involve a substantial scope for interpretation of the law by the Department, | | te . The second: of the two may be disposed of quickly, Sec.‘ 349(a) (2) states that an American citizen shall lose his nationality by "tak=. ing an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof," Oswald delivered to the American Embassy in Moscow on October 31, .. 1959, a signed statement reading: "I affirm that my allegiance is to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics," The Department has — taken the position that this statement ‘and conduct by Oswald did not have the effect of! depriving him of his American nationality . . ‘under. sec. 349(a)(2). Thig determination was based on a number of Sn cases in which the Department: and, other tribinals have consistently _ held that. HW 54653 DBocld:32217672 Page 10
as a en CONFIDENTIAL Cs lygd s+ ‘held that "for loss of nationality to result from taking an oath of allegiance to a foreign state, the oath must be one'which ts: ' prescribed by law or .by regulations having the force ‘of law’ and must be taken before a competent official of the government con= cerned," (III Hackworth Digest of International Law 218 (1942), Also, it hag been held that. the oath or declaration must. place "the person taking it in complete subjection to the state to which © it is taken, at least for’ the period of the contract, ‘so ‘that it ‘is impossible for him to perform the obligations of citizenship . to this country," : = - / - f Sth. tate hata heveien) The Department has taken the view that Oswald's statement «— . a could not reasonably be interpreted to have placed him "in complete ee subjection ta" the U.S,S.R., within the terms of this requirement, (The legal authorities are set out in full in the Department!s . report to the Warren Commission.) That is thus the pertinent law, and the Department's interpretation of it, with respect to allegi- _ance to a foreign state ag an-act of expatriation by a United = °- . States citizen, SCA has considered whether‘ the: Department should change its policy in favor of a more liberal interpretation which would find a greater number and variety of acts to meet’ the statutory requirement and constitute ac ts of expatriation. It is SCA's position, however, that in view of the firm line of legal authori- ties on both the points involved, and in view of the policy con~_ sideration that an American citizen should be held to have com- - . mitted the momentous act of expatriating himself only when there |-— cannot be the slightest doubt about it, that the interpretations » applied by the Department to the Oswald case were proper ones and . should not be changed; : _ —_ As to expatriation= by renunciation of citizenship, sec, 349 . . a (a) (6) of the Act provides that-an American citizen shall loge his oo, -nationality by "making a formal renunciation of nationality before I. _ . a diplomatic: or consular officer of the United States in a foreign | state, in such form as may be prescribed by the Secretary of . Stated" re ee Current statistics show that.in 1962 there were 202 cases of renunciation of United States nationality abroad under this - Statutory provision, that in 1963-there were 254 such cases, | oo _ During the first 9 months of 1964, 212 persons renounced United | State nationality abroad, ‘ In accordance with the statute, the Secretary has set forth the requisite form and procedure for renunciation of citizenship, These regulations are.found in Sections 50.1 and 50.2 of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and in Section 225.6 of Volume 8 of the Foreign Affairs Manual. They. provide, ‘among other things, poe _that four copies of the specified renunciation form are tobe. | :' ee - a ee -'. executed, and, the original .. so), CONFIDENTIAL HW 54653 Docld:322127672 Page 11