UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 5 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION In Reply, Please Refer to October 15, 1975 Washington, D. C. 20535 sikaer UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) RE: INTERVIEW OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) SPECIAL AGENT HOMER W. SCHWEPPE BY SSC STAFF MEMBER JAMES DICK On September 23, 1975, after a short orientatiou discussion ond after advising him of his rights under the Constitution and reminding him that his appearance was voluntary, SSC Staff Member James Dick interviewed FBI ‘Special Agent Homer W. Schwepne in the presence of SSC stenotypist Susan Hanback regarding his knowledge of the following: The "Hunter Project," “Bureau Informant 200," "the SAM Survey," "Z Coverage," and opening of mail by FBI employees, At the outset Dick asked Schweppe to document his FBI service. Schweppe responded by listing the following: Assignments in Sen Francisco from late 1946 to mid-1947; in Los Angeles from mid-1947 to mid-1951; at FBI Headquarters (FBIHQ) from May, 1951, to May, 1958, and again from late 1960 to November, 1961; in the Washington Field Office (WFO) of the FBI from May, 1958, on, except for the 1960 to 1961 period just cited. . During the course of the interview Schweppe was also asked to indicate the nature of his assignments at’ FBIHQ., He indicated he was assigned for the main part to units within the Domestic Intelligence Division dealing with Soviet military attache personnel and with members of Elizabeth Bentley's “espionage ring." This document contcing neither + recommendations nor conclusions of the BL It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency: it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. eee | “DECLASSIETED ep dvpim |b . SERRET Paihia oxen) " MOL) Classified\by #7366 ; Exempt fromAGDS, Category 2 Date of Deélassification Indefinite : excuosune G2-//6 39S - (AS / ocTd: S29689536 Page 31
U.S.- SSC ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES sper Dick's initial inquiry was directed to the extent of Schweppe's knowledge of the "Hunter Project." When Schweppe conceded he was not flmiliar with the term, Dick offered as an exhibit for review a copy of a February 6, 1958, memorandum directed to Director Hoover entitled "Hunter Project." This memorandum outlined arrangemerits to be effected between the FBI and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) regarding the manner in which the FBI would be provided the results of CIA's monitoring of certain overseas mail, On review of the document, Schweppe stated he was certain he had nuver seen that memo, but he acknowledged that on the basis of the mero he had a recollection about such activity by the CIA, Schweppe recalled that at some point prior to his transfer from FBIHQ in May, 1958, and he indicated he felt it must have been earlier than the February 8, 1958, date indicated above, he had pass across his desk in the normal flow of official mail what he referred to as the modern day version of computer printout lists consisting, to the best of his recollection, of names of what were presumed to be Soviet residents as well as addresses in the Soviet Union. Schweppe indicated that he Kad soen ‘several such lists but since they did not seem applicable to the type of cases being supervised by Schwepne eat the time, he paid them little heed. He_recalled that at least with some of the later printouts there were instructions accompanying theprintouts to the effect that names and/or addresses of interest should be flagged for what was presumed to be a "watch list" of some sort. Dick asked specifically when Schweppe first became aware of the lists mentioned above; whether he was familiar with FBI Form 5-88, a form prepared for placing @ request on the “watch list"; whether he had seen any of the resuits of the CIA monitoring; and whether he had seen any reproduction of correspondence photographed by CIA in connection with the "Hunter Project." 2. SERET MW 55079 Doold: 32939536 Page 32 hh ce es Pen bs etter maensaen tenn Napeentts citer ene tee
Mw 55074 U.S. SSC ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES sppfier Schweppe replied that he thought the lists he mentioned earlier probably were seen by him before February, 1958, but he acknowledged he could not recall} exactly when. He said he could not now recall ever haviug seen FBI Form 5~88. He replied that, since he felt he had never placed a name or address on the “watch List," he would not have any specific results routed to his personal attention, He added, however, that if the results were routed to all supervisors concerned with Soviet intelligence and related matters, he probably did see such results and routinely initialed the accompanying routing slips. He said he could recall no specific "CIA results" if, in fact, he did see anything specific, . Dick asked whether Schweppe was aware of who designated the routing of the lists he had seen, and Schweppe responded that he assumed it was some individual in the office of the division's Assistant Director who performed such an administrative function. Schweppe said he did not recall a Miss Triplett (phonetic), who, accorGing to Dick, was responsibie for routing the “Hunter Project" matorial to appropriate supervisors. Schvweppe said he could have been included in such routing because of his assignment, Dick then queried Schweppe on his familiarity with the term "Bureau Informant 200" (BI 200), when he first became aware of the term, and whether he ever saw any of the material attributed to that informant, In this connection Dick exhibited another FBINQ memo dated February 6, 1958, which referred to BI 200 as the designation used by FBIHQ to forward to its field offices information received from CIA under the “Hunter Project." Sehwepne was unable to recall exactly when he first became aware of the use and identity of BI 200, but he assumed it was in early 1958, He said he could recall seeing information attributed to BI 200 both while at FBIHQ and in WYO but that he could no lonrmer recall the specific nature of the items involved. He said he presumed that all of them dealt with-Sovict-related investigatory matters, Schweppe said he did not believe he has seon any references to 3% 200 in the past 15 years or so and that he may have seen as many as five references a year before that. Dooid: 32989536 Page 33 ay
. U.S. SSC ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES SECRET Dick also queried Schweppe about his knowledge of the "SAM Survey" (SAM) and "Z Coverage" (Z). He asked Schwepne whether he knew when "SAM" and "Z" were initiated, what they consisted of, when they ceased, when. he first became aware of them, and whether he had seen any results of those projects. Schweppe replied that "SAM" and "Z'" were on & need-to-know basis within WFO but that he in time heard about them through office “shop talk" and then concluded that those designations indicated projects in which mail to and/or from the Soviet Union and Soviet bloc countries was monitored, He said he did not know when those projects were initiated or when they texminated, He said that he would have to guess within a tolerance of two or three years that ‘.e first heard of those projects in the early 1960s. Schweppe said he was called on from time to time to translate correspondence in German, which corresponience had been photographed by some source not identified initially. Schweppe suggested that on later inquiry about the source of the correspondence he was . gnformed it was either from "SAM" or "2." He said he was unable to recall specifically who so advised him. He felt it was possibile that word was just "passed along" to that effect. He could not recall whether each specific individual item was identificd in a particular, speciai manner so as to tie it in to its source. Schweppe stated that he believes all such material translated by him was directed to officials at the Soviet and/or Soviet bloc embassies in Washington, D, C., and not to any non-diplomatic personnel. Such translation requirements were quite infrequent, and Schweppe was not called on to translate any such material within the past eight or ten years, to the best of his recollection, Schweppe said it was his impréssion that "SAM" in New York City was handled in space al one .or the other of New York's airvorts, le said he was unaware of the specific arrangements in Washington, D. C. He related that he was’ aware taat FBI Special Agent John De Bettencourt, since deceasad, was directiy involved in WFO's "Z Coverage" project but that he did not know specifically to whom De Bettencourt was answerable, NW 35079 Docld:32999536 Page 94 Ales
+ dl . . ~ 4 U.S. SSC ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ‘ i) T | | Dick asked whether Schweppe was aware of any mail having been opened by FBI enployees in situations other than the projects referred to above. Schweppe, after making the observation that Federal law and FBI regulations prohibit such activity, said he himself had never ovened anyone's mail in his capacity as an FBI emplovee, that he never observed any other FBI employee so engaged, and that he personally was not aware of any specific instances in which thet might have happened. At this point Schweppe related that while hea was assigned to the Los Angeles Office, he suspected that a female employee, whose name he could not recall, might possibly have been engaged in the surreptitious opening of other people's mail because of the suspicioasgnature of her actions at certain times, Schweppe oedded that these were suspicions raised by circumstantial evidence only. Dick then presented a hypothetical situation in Which agents on duty might obtain mail nosted by an individual and then proceed to open the same and review the contents. We asked whether Schweppe was aware of any such instances. Schweppe acknowledged that the suggested Scenario sounded realistic enough but added that he could recall no such actual situations, During the course of the interview, Schweppe indicated that he had been assigned to Soviet-related investigatory matters in WFO until early 1959, after , which he was assigned to the handling of German, Latin American, Middle East, and Chinese investigatory matters at different times. Schwevpe concluded by stating that his knowledge and recollection of the subject matter constituting the basis for the inquiry were weak, Ue reiterated that he never opened any other person's mail in his capacity as an FBI employee, that he never witnessed any other FBI employce opening any Such mail, and that he cannot recall ever being avare of any Situation in which mail was opened by FBI employees, exclusive of the "SAM" and "Z" projects mentioned above, This interview commenced about 10:15 a.m., September 23, 1975, and concluded at about 11:15 p.m. the same day. ° 5x spefier HW 35079 Doold: 328689536 Page 35 L
A ~ Mr. W. O. Cregar - Mr. T. E. Burns - oe: 8 ; : ! . ) : - : 1 Jd The siyisthen General. _ 7 October 34, 1975 firector, FBI. 0 .S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE 7 Reference is made to: the letter. ‘from the SSC dated x yo Octeber 2, 1975, requesting, inter alia, the series of. studies \ OS o£ various. aspects of FBE operations which were previously 7 ope prepared by the FBI at the request of former Deputy ‘Attorney Wy z= Gener al William D. Ruckelshaus. : a N\ The original of a memorandum along with the requested ~. : material. is -being submitted - herewith ° for. your, ‘approval and. ~s forwarding to. the Committee in’ response to the Committee's ~ request’ in this -matter.. ; f Lo A copy off this: memorandum is being furnished for & € +. your records. ly Ss . 2b Enclosures (BEI osu oe gi 38 | : 2 bot 2 -116305 7 . —— RN aa 5 1 —- The Deputy Attorney General Quer Pr AB) a Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr. 77 of 6 Ss 7: Special Counsel for _ y 3 : Intelligence Coordination A. H é BIS | S03 ii. TEB:ba/en €O | ae _ + 15 NOV 261975 ~ \ Assoc. Dir. ____ wr . . : _ : . >, . Dep. AD Adm. o/ | pe rn en rrr Dep. AD Inv. __ ‘y . .? as Asst. Dir: Le : “eo, min. “eg fs eres L INFORMATION CONTAINED .” Comp. ya “het rn. IS,UNCLASSIFIED ,, _-) Ext. Affairs me Files & Com. — : ee pres \e Gen. Inv. : _ té Ident. . iS - Laboratory Plan. & Eval. _.. Spec. Inv. Training : . v fF “ o Director to y— AIL a {Ve _ ’ TELETYPE _— , >» : GPO : 1975 0 - sfo-sz0 55079 DeociId: 32389536 Page 98 a AJ .
“ - Admin. Gas. A. Mintz . Mr. J. B. Hotis) -~ Mr. W. R. Wannall Mr. W. O. Cregar '- Mr. T. E. Burns t Hep ON " 62216395 . Oetober 38,1975 ‘U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH | RESPECT 10 INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) RE: SERIES OF STUDIES PREPARED AT THE REQUEST © OF FORMER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS Reference is made to SSC letter to ‘the Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination of the Department of Justice dated Octeber 2, 1975, requesting, inter alia, a series of studies of various aspects of FBI operations previously prepared by the FBI at the request of former Deputy Attorney General William DBD; Ruckelshaus:.. Pursuant to the above SSC tequest, we. are forwarding herewith the requested material. Also included in this material for your ready reference is a copy of the memo- randum from Mr. Ruckelshaus to the Director, FBI, dated. July 20, 1973, captioned "Substantive Issues Regarding the . Future of the "FBI," which memorandum initiated the requested studies. For your further information, it appears from a 'xveview of FBI files that of the original 11 areas of Assoc. Dir. ___. Dep. AD Adm. _ Dep. AD Inv. _ Asst. Dir.: Comp. Syst. _ Ext. Affairs Files & Com, — Gen. Inv. ident. Inspection Intell. Laboratory Plan. & Eval. — "Spec. Inv. Training Legal Coun. Telephone Rm. — Director Sec’y — inquiry including those not previously furnished to the inquiry contained in the July 20, 1973, Ruckelshaus memo- randum, supra, only eight responses were delivered. to the U. S,. Department of Justice and that the remaining . - three responses regarding inquiries numbered two, eight, and 10, were never submitted to the Department. fhe material being furnished with this memorandum, however, includes responses to all 11 areas of the Ruckelshaus Department., _ 4 = WY Bo TEB:ba/en 224) ~-. i) . 7m (8) °--- 4 SEE NOTE PAGE TWO By This document t prepared in response to your request and is not ior. se a e nation outside your Committee. Its “1se 4s limited to enor re your Committee and the content may net be disclosed to uno MAIL RSM it ee pal OSUE 7,2. -/ / G 4 in eal GPO : 1975 O - 569-920 \ NW 55079 Docld: 32589536 Page 99
Res Series of Studies Prepared at the Request o£ Pormer Deputy Attorney Ceneral William BD. Ruckelshaus With respect to inquiry number three of the Ruckelshaus memorandum, two items included in the original response to the Department, viz., Section 87 of the Mannal of Instructions, and the study prepared in August, 1972, for former Acting Director Eh. Patrick Gray IIT, i.e., the Position Paper prepared by former FBI Section Chick Thomas J. Smith captioned "Domestic Intelligence Divisilon~Scope of FRI Authority, Jurisdiction, and Responsibilities En Domestic Intelligence Investigations," have not been included in the material furnished herewith since both items were previously furnished to the SSC in response to earlier and separate requests. 1 - The Attorney General NOTE: Copies of those studies previously furnished to the Department were readily located in appropriate files. However, review of numerous logical files failed to’ locate any serials revealing a response to the _ Department relative t@ inquiries two, eight, and 10 of the 7/20/73 Ruckelshaus memorandum. By memorandum from O. T. Jacobson to Mr. Callahan, 7/5/74, (almost one year later) regarding the status of responses to the Ruckelshaus inguiry, it was noted that response to questions two, eight, and 10, while completed and ready for the Department, had not been furnished to the Department. The memorandum is apparently consistent with another earlier memorandum to W. R. Wannall from T. J. Smith dated 12/14/73, regarding this matter wherein it was suggested that prior to com- pleting any studies which had been ordered by Richardson (former AG) and Ruckelshaus, we should wait for Mr. Saxbe to take office as AG. This memorandum also contained Director's notation "No need to do anything further at this point." Material prepared in response to questions two, eight, and 10 was located in the IS-3 Section, INTD, and is being included in material furnished to SSC since such material appears to be covered by the SSC request. ~ 2Q= ‘HW 55079 Doold:32989536 Page 100 a
5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535 Addressee: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE COLTR (ALHM [)Memo [)Report dated 10/31/75 * Caption of Document: U.S, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE 10/2/75 Request ‘ Originating Office: Delivered by: Received by: Pas Title: Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI vaunsyye (22 03 7L= [OBE HW 35079 Doocld: 329599536 Page i101
piey MW 55079 Docld: 32999536 Page LO? . Kame: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE an CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE BEFORE COMPLETING. TO: Intelligence Community Staff FROM: ATTN: Central Index SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees 1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term, If a document was made available 2. DATE PROVIDED for review but not transmitted, so note.) Fee L voconent [| [onrerine | [owrenview| [testimony | Jorwen | 20/81/75 5. . IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; éive name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject) Memorandum and enclosures IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, other- « CLASSIFICATION OF wise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.) INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword) SSC letter 10/2/75 3 if key words not listed are used underline for emphasis) . . KEY worDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; Operating procedures . SUMMARY (See reverse side before complet ing this item) Materials relating to a series of studies of varicus aspects of PBI operations. previsusly prepared by the FBI at the request of former Deputy Attorney General Williem D. Ruckelshaus. Also — furnished is a eopy of 7/20/73 Rackelshaus to the Director memorandum captioned "Substantive Issues Regarding The Puture of the FB" thich initiated the requested studies. : 62-116395 FMR: £mk - co, a (4) ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX "EN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75 —_ { ‘ | TREAT AS VELLOW °° 2 ay ‘ * yt CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE 3791 6-75)
(OUSTUDY/SENSTUDY "JUNE" ENCLOSURE PERMANENT CHARGE OUT FORM —_—. x Hi if ’ . : \ o . Ly b - . . RE - -HOUSTUDY 62-116464- OR | SENSTUDY: 62-116395- /o8¢ NOTE: THIS IS A PERMANENT CHARGE OUT FOR A XEROX COPY/COPIES OF "JUNS" MAIL THAT WAS INCLUDED IN COPIES OF FBI DOCUMENTS FURNISHED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY MEMO/LETTER DATED AQ-5 J=72 IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST(S) MADE BY EITHER THE U. S. SENATE OR HOUSE: SELECT COMMITTEES ON INTELLIGENCE. THES COPY/COPIES OF THE "JUNE" MAIL DATED AS INDICATED BELOW HAS/HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS ENCLOSURE MATERIAL TO BE ‘FILED IN THR APPROPRIATE HOUSTUDY OR SENSTUDY "JUNE" FILE INDICATED ABOVE, LOCATED IN THE SPECIAL FILE ROOM OF THE "RECORDS SECTION. — DATE(S) OF MAIL: ¢/0- 2-15 REMOVED BY:(,)Qnrcllew DATE aevovep: G-88-JC NW 55079 Docid: 32989536 Page i104 Lan
\ ) | {= war, J, A, Mintz _ i ee _.- T= Mr. W. BL Wannall . / “ post. i - .-~ Mr. W,:O, Cregar — - ee 1- Mr. R. L, Shackelford fo: ‘ 1- Mr. F, J. Cassidy . . ‘The Attorney. Genéral \ ae October 31, 1975. 1- Mr. D. K: Pettus « - UNAT ED O samfemns SELECT COMNETTER iy ie | 4O: STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITs - : M« RESPECT™ To INFELMIGENCE ACTIVITIES: (S86) Pa) by! f= XQ Reference: is. mnie to the letter of the ssc dated ly October 4, 1975, birtpienetons fever ot certain FBI material 1 pertain SS 4 May. 26, “£964, vetting & forth teasoas 3 for the FBPs invetiglive TO ComMmotiTEs. interest in Mr. eon: Letwin, ‘a , FAN . | A thorough ‘review of FBI files fails to- disclose any: a _» material which indicates, the FBI. had an. investigative & interest in . . Mr. Bowles. 2 _ . Q toe A.copy of the May 26, 1964, memorandum regarding Q Q “Letwin is being furnished for your records. ¥ ya Ww DI ay 23 3 oy - BR Noa. We3GL C1085 aay , ~ Ny 62. yD snctobures - 4 A Assoc. Dire (SAIN ee ada eS TES rake: Gq . Dep. ad Adm. 1 = Fhe Deputy Attorney General | | wer obi Inv . _ Attention: Michael EB. ‘Shaheen;. df. dane A Aénin. — . Special Counsel for ~~) ‘9.3 : Be Eaten ft. - ntelligence Coordination bi Files & Com. ~~ i 4s. + 1 ; a 8 Gen, Inv. _.___. . ~ nae ky 4s. 4 * Adent, _i1- 62- 116000 (Gointelipio) by bay, a) eae 1 100-365437 (Letwin)- AA a Lshoratory af r “iy ' er Q- ce ae i A oe RD S ctor See"y MAIL, oom) TELETYPE ur a, - GPO: 1975 0'- 569-820 NW “55079 Doold: 32989536 Page i05°
“* b Mr. J ‘ Mintz 1- e 7 . 1- Mr. W. R. Wannall ' oat 1- Mr. W, O, Cregar 1- Mr. R. L, Shackelford 1- Mr. F, J, Cassidy 1- Mr. D, K, Pettus 62- 116395 October 31, 1975. UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMDATTEER . TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC): RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING NR. LEON LETWIN AND AJR. GEORGE B, BOWLES Reference is made to the letter of the SSC dated October 7, 1975, requesting delivery of FBI material pertaining to reasons for the FBI's investigative interest in fir. George B. Bowles. and iir. Leon Letwin. A thorough review of FBI files fails to disclose any material which indicates the FBI had an investigative interest in ir. Bowles, In accordance with this request, a memorandum, appropriately excised, captioned “leon Letwin,” dated May 26, 1964, which sets forth reasons for the FBI's investigative interest in lfr. Letwin is being delivered with this memorandum. Enclosure 1 ~ The Attorney General CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL AF PACHED 1 - 62-116009 (Cointelpro) 1 - 100-365437 (Letwin) . DEPlfj [fj ce adaim. (24) aeows”  NOTE: Admin. Comp. Syet. — See letter to the Attorney General dated 10/31/75, cap- Wi ricsacen.— tioned "United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental “!, ~ Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, " prepared by DKP 24). Laboratory = i IG lh 8 Legal Coun. Telephone Rm. Director Sec'y — MAIL ROOM(__] TELETYPE UNIT (__] NW 55079 Doold:32989536 Page 106 ENCLOSURE b2 HGF - f (ots
SS rear Lerrarerrarentvarveuareg a . oy wenn Siu ehaaniereinemmmsnenaheemmn nn ee rae ERED DEST sxe wep tein en os = fe y AY Gags £dOD CICMUOosRuNa ‘ ue ee . se . \ el ) % : l~ % 2 > , Ne soe > x - be oi se LoD a) « Pom sao 3 Me - t co fe r i é oe or) co i a C3 mt uo y vr \ rs > a4 ot otek SS fq oO vs sm 82 Ps mt 2 TS td peal ne 4 ros ee a 2 vet ved ~ 2 @ r3 Gort mou @ Pe uD y O od w 4,4 9. 1G oot ut fa OD S ea Bo onal SAS OO & C$ Py wert ob Ll ; ae, | wi SOS a @ Fn <r as or) i bao GS GYM Sheet oy tom > ! is a) Q eg ste? ED) er OO) ee Gx ob Pn Sar ee ~~ ri FS qy LF oM oN BS Ans a & Oo Or Om POO WO 8 > S oe =| ( rat QO me CG Vaart Show .+) ri og oft pe tt Te oret Q Nw : or j o 8 G bet Es pet so 4 5 a Weg. YN ws FF iL bey n ~ of a & © «OS a G1g LE TN et 4 OO * . 2 2 oO K a xe) Op CS eto SNe GF mat" 8 OO OO GB OG ows C3 “SPS A. sy . a) : og i a ree Pre OOS ew Pye} \S / DRS XS “5 aoW NG G8 O mM Qed be NS , Ses we ws % Y Gwe YP OU oO eB BO eFOa EAS aon QS ~ “or @ Sg Sed &S PR SP MR eA Qn ko ™ ASR ON oeaae G 6p eX a $n @ B Sp A rea we OP Ty OR a no om 4 D rm) Q) oereh Gy a 45 ¢8 PIA Pe Tt ed 2 TS bo 8 \ oH Yo YD Oo vet ed werk ee wet £3 ye Ih om +O OY ned OS iad ne ’ and $9 6b of, BS nei Qwi CD GB rei GO ms Ln wed es BH - xg ‘5 ON ret bo re fon) C3 Cl ox 42 C2 Gas Ww ol SR rt avg NS ee Ne @ Os OG LG ort SADA Rr ta om we g ne oO ww ono } & \g ajmei cpr gs Ba os fo STS. oan bat om fer ow Ba Ye Ge red WB PW v4 oN ON EY woe OR ae ml =: & Oi A Oo a Ce ee en c/s EOS ° =| Be * foi cos Bo se Gor “ert AGP & OF = yop? A sj by 25 Beet dad 02 @ io ht Ow foe EB eno O yp ep S fet pal oO & Q GV omt Ga Ow Gas oa ga a SB 3S ys = bao LY ~”Q \*) C23 GD mL O ns on oe) OM Red Bo oo for ae “s Se +2, or of hy O32 BP Gay ay OU! Ber ret ss Se <q ry 2 iad ae o2 of Spm, 8 we oh Ps ong Twp A ON oS == Z 5s tA £Q Pais a Berd oS SO Gk et Wd 8 w L Q ate GO WR wt yet rs 4 wb Uh om £3 2 > vd oom Et ae SS Ow QO OO GE pH tet 8 Vertu he CG + @ O Oo ys dot RS wy ret fy ft 09 Sy b> ye wa If To Ew owe m I< let 3 ee me | Boeri ved Dur 12 OD Sd Gert OLIN MD ° om oN i fi fa Te el $2 oO tl > Og PO meet UNH @ id i fad Oo” wd OO O-m SOH OD enw tomm oun ay i (| v7) £2 UO WE 0 Umea As FOW D oO = sq} | 4 om 1 OO Pel oO Oi ms co OO tA On = & . we! Sw f sv Ari — UF wal UPON & 83 4 GO . = oth @ os Covet fis is GG UO fee -7 au 4 a os i 61 "TS OG) Ee Dou wy tes m3 bay ne a WwW DP db oD © rar tc. . mG @ eI fa cae Oo GN Peat Bo A ae 8 XP a = wy G3 srt Mb Wt D> Hea mw ofa Ose aw -\ = 5 > “4 @ uv Ga me D GP MY Ott & oO oe Sia SN Ee iB “* ® owl zoe D ej 86 © SAO Cb te me GH ao ec ~ eye . ¢ Cg AE wg Me OW) 2 UO LY Gi ek Pk OPH i Gan . oO. £4 @ wow I ed sD te Sh Oat be oT wa yw: ce [1 ib : Mon pl UP Oe ON aro 3 © 3D wwe B ~ & a ¥ . * 3 a rel ad KO oOONMAUBeadg gs. CX % © C3 gw Od Se) pra TLQ reed Tyce he Ge a Eo ee .en Ooi ® wm Sc Md oe + nd So EG oe w 2) uy = . xd UO too. ms Woch 3 ww & G pe. a & : i) a ity eco oD OO - vets otaovda E} ea & 2H ord oO ty Ch od wi 8 Ep Cdn fe A OD NO rm eG i $3 Se Sea - cal VEE g 2 Oo FO GSA GPT ~ Seige FF es fry 6B ° hon 73) wR owl > Se Bp OY ro STN Qo y (3 la “ x 2 wt OO Ws So so OO “tl © Doe O Mo OH Oe ga | SB Fae 5 . ,* o REN GLAD OD BOw Merten OG TION Fy | ai | (caf i a . “4d ay rail ‘ ae a ola c 3 ie) ae eSis2zguici eis IB onan 2exrGleSseeozeers ev ‘ SSeS SES BSS sSead FPRBEOCOCRANRGEArErZO es