e 4 SECRET fBhenm Failed fn} Tatha TRAINING REPORT - LANGUAGE PRERCH NS tue ee ‘ NO. OF Bf us¢n7s : 60, UF OUR : H 7 ~ in 2 Ow 08/06 468 aaa 0 tert tee UPSETS GELS ed tabhtttttienterenn sheet ccs <a" . i RaAUE yop #00 Date - vere i MURPHY, DAVID 2 obsess fo g (Fee severae ete fos Hedini Meet i eee Ag mente gare en ANS TRUE TORS astawati TLavintagy PRP RME Oat dat fee } — eet ant een ete kane a Mensa gay tnsetnnenge SanED Ginna ieee a anna att a= fom etree creme etn aeeentrens ames yo cnn Ne, HELE RS ee ENS . - nen 8 emcee ae ent ne of-langu we trsialog see attainment OO proficiency ins PANES, eboeretaniier, reached and Lornifig wyectives are (4) ani lity to produce and ai Tinnuish the s ef the Tangusees (2) anility fib Air of BASIC sentonges And erpressianyy (4) abl}ity fo rroamting the eloverts of basi sn oa So analy them to nes situations; (a) ability ta comercnead tne fae SHatic: SOOKE At ne val Sperdoin vari sg (G) anility to write and read the Tamura ‘Commensurate witn ability ta srena, in all courses ster orl drilis and free conversation based at first an mesoriced mitertal amt, on wartinf reading urlals, writtem and oral tests are given at fatervats, tisteaing to and ren i in the tanguage La is ansential for class prenaration, Hm PETC Giesas PVALtAT ON uAbaAt hy AGMEL GE aly 2 ee nee oe tee tn ee Rares tnntate te ere ATTO RUDE ATTE meOancs istiware ECAT COMPLETION OF Thadserrs Pospicial test _o weno y Canaan cote ween ped neta ee ee oe Paoricty | Bi luuf | Rorur\r ary { TNTkawEnT Al; Ded foe a bee Tp ml eritiag ~ ue a Hats j - aE _ ~ ree ym ems atrnneenen thane a Se Porelin Lang Guage Aptitude Test: None ora Mme Stbet Oe OF Mat wim: ee cee eves “Sy aS prneety ePer Ff StF eat a Re TO ayy wt Fac ee at at bd ah we esewa SECRET ue a tag. ne pg ed Bete ne . BA Pe Art ERPS REG TOR tact — scene tne eT BORE an stiaintettctine er Ret cna emer SPS REE IPS 5 Ae SIT SPR AS 2 TR RS | STs PE DOORTY PSE ASMA AL EAT TR RAMA AI SAL Bt eee An A 9 # eet a ta PE SEE
gBECRET Chirn Operations Course Ne, 120% GG hours, full vine oe March 1968 Ctudent : Murphy, Terria Le Cffice ; 1. ER Your of Birth:[ - + = Service Desfgastion: 5 Orite 208-18 . to. of Students ; 7% PD Date - : April 1LOhé To prepare Clandesticn Services offleers to comluct operations ag2inst Comcuntst Chinn tres the point at view of lusan Source Collection; te present mateviel 4irected toward the updating of officers in the operation:l realitica inside and cutulde Chinn today; aod specifically to train c?ficers in providing polittoal, polLtical- military, advanced weapons anc ciher covernge of the priority Chica terget wnich cannot be chtatued by technical means. ACHIEVEMENT RECCRD This 18 a certificate cf atrendance., No record te ende of individual perforcance in ti course. POR THE DIRECTCR OF TRAINING: Chiel® Inatructor Secret
$-E-C-R-E-T a THAINING REPORT Chiefo of Station Seminar No. 2.68 | 80 houra, fulltime | - 14 Pabruary IGS Participant t David 2. raurahey Olfice - 2. + c/SB Year of Birth: [| Setvice Designation: pn Grade 8 65-18 No, of Studente $18. EOD Date 3 19k8 COURSE OBJECTIVES, CONTENT AND METHODS The COS Seminar {a aimed to prepare prospective Chiefs and Deputy Chiefa.d Station and Chiefa of Base for field assignments. . Emphasis wae upon the difficulties confronting Chiefs of arcall or " medium-diged installationa, since they must handle a’ pecaliarly wide range of problerns. Included were case studies serving Lo remind outgoing chiefs of various operational approaches azz techniques, but more time was devoted. to policy, coordination, management, reporting, and administrative responsibilities of the Chief of Station, both within CIA and in the government at large, at home and abroad, . The bulk of the course ig given in lectures and question periods conducted by officials responsible for the missions, functines, pro~- grams, and services discussed. A few key items of suggested read=. ing are included, and bibliographies of suggested reading tallozed to the individual's assignment are offered for those who want them, - ACHIEVEMENT RECORD. Thie lea certificate of attendance, No further assesemect of individual capacity or performance is made in this course. FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING: arnt CL | a _ “Date SoReal oR eB oT
C 6700 i | MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORT FORM ‘ 1 26 April 1967 Name: David E. Murphy Spe i) Date of birth: re) Sex: Male Grade: GS-18 SD: D ~ \ Official position title: Chief, Soviet Bloc Division Current station: Headquarters Type of report: Annual Reporting period: 1 April 1966 = 31 March 1967 Mr. Murphv's responsibilities during this reporting period were enlarged to encompass the Satellites as well as the Soviet Union. There has been no change in his fine performance reflected in the previvus report. ~ Se Thomaa H. Karamessines Assistant Deputy Director for Plano [ have noted this report, * fi fo 7? p44 “ ef $ boibvyf%- Comments of reviewing official: ook on ates . a a , & a - t 3 a} { Me = te \ Deamon! PiuGé@eald Deputy Director toy Plans
ao, SECRET Cihen Filles ie? EMPLOYEE SURIAL NUMBER OZSECTIOO FITNESS REPORT SECTION A eect pe mgt tens to suet ve! en cece eg ee ne pen VT sane haat? theeet) (Middle) “2 gare ot BOTs | SER *. GRaAGe [® 30 Murphy David Be . GS Boy dD “el orric posites tu ~ — — : OT USSTGNMEMT IA. unne MY STATION 6. OP RICIAL POSITECN TITLE | Chief, SR_ Division v. one cn mo Headquarte rters [ Ie Tran aRY [rer ASStGNMENT BP EWES ONT HE ATSIGMMENT EMP LOWE EL c AAC ERPROVISION AL | (See iste tena » Sactia C} a. tee Perea orn ee be pees no nny ea ene eit ta RE Te ta tA te ; I OP RCLAL (Specify le _ . _- . 2 UFevere tee) Aneil ies - SL March 1966 14. OaTe REPORT OVE IN O.F, 30 ‘April 1966 CEC TING A s PERFORMANCE Ewas tie temas SUBJECT: Mr. David E. Murphy ‘Ll. This report covers the performance of Mr. Nurphy as Chief of the SR Division for the past year, 2. The past year has seen & measurable increase in the. work load of the SR Division, with no let up in the energetic efforts ‘ef the Division to accomplish its mission. A number of new _ operations have come into being and the support rendered the Division by the other areca divisions has been a reflection of the success of Mr. Murphy's program to enlist the interest and the energies of the other area divisions in attacking one of our principal targets, 3. Mr. Murphy has now assumed new responsibilities ag chief of a substantially enlarged division including the satellites as wellas the Soviet Union, This is a tribute to his own outstanding management of his division as well as a recegnition of the close operational interrelationship between Soviet and satellite activities. Thomas H, Karaniessines . Assistant t Deeuty Director for Plans T have noted the above report, \ wan NC Mews yeh, i BE. Murphy ] Gommenta of reviewing official: ey ~ af Oh 4p ald . Deputy Darectar for Plans
14-00000 ’ SECRET (When FIlded In) EMPLOYEE SeRiaL NUNBER FITNESS REPORT SECTIO oe _GENERAL _ 1. NAME ‘Loe (Fives) (Middle) [2 ar SER Ml Grane {3.607077 me .MURPHY David EE, | M___ (GS 18 | D : . 8. OF FICIAL POSITION TITLE ~—— nn 17. OFrsoivenR OF ASS! TNMENT - CURRENT STATION — . Chief, SR Division | DDP/SR i Headquarters 116 CHEEK (x) TYPE OF REPORT Tatassionmen F SUPT RvisOR anh i “3 . } Ki annuac IRE ASSIGNMENT EMPLOVEER i i SPECIAL (Spocity): 1h. DATE REPORT OUE 1 0.8, 30 April 1965 _ {|__| April 1964 - 31 March 1965 SECTION 68 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION i : | 12. PE PORTING PERIOD (Fram fox} i We. Wank Perlormance ranges from wholly inadequote to slightly loss than satisfactory, A rating in thia category requires | . FO sitive somedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on brabation, to reassignment of to seperation. De bcribe action token oF proposed in Section C, A» Adequate Performance meets all rsquiroments. ft is onticaly satisfactory and Is chorocterized nelther by deficieney nor eacallence. : P + Proficient Parfarmance is more thon satisfactory. Désived racults are boing produced ina proficient mannar. 3 + Strong Peslormance is characterized by excoptional proficiency. O- Qutatanding Performance is so exceptional in relation te requirements of the work ond in comparison to tho porlormance of others doing similar work a4 to wortant special recognition. ™ SEO Wee SPECIFIC DUTIES : List up to six of the moet important specific duties porformed duting the voting pariod. Insert rating letter which base describes the manner in which employee perlosms EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. Alt ‘employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on theie abilivy to Supervise findicate number of employees auperviged). SPECIPIC OUTY NO. tO en nes ~ TR a TNS . . LETTER SPECIFIC OUTY HO. 2 SPECIFIC DUTY NOLS Soetemeieieendbel teeetaraet ae a a SPECIRIC OUTY Ha, & SPECIFIC OuUTY HO. 4 SPECIFIC CUTTY HO. 8 I i _ OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION _ —s Toko into aceaunt eversthing choy? she emplopwe which imil emcee his sflactivanwes in hie curend Ge svielssy aveh oo pers * farmence ef erecifec duties, Rodetlivity, casdvch an sab, ¢cegeran ere ts, pertinent sorsonal acts of Prab:P a, gent i articular liretrations ef toleets. Buosed ga your baowledge vi eeplayce’s everall perlermance aims che rating pariod,- oO afoce the lores Lethe sting bee Terretpanding he Che ataiewmne which aoa aeewately retiecta Sie fasal of pee laemange, § JU APH 1365), Pome 4§ : Prev} POOLE Te PE cae She bigag, SECRET ae \
14-00000 . : . 4 rar erate 1 April 1965 MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF ANNUAL FITNESS REPORT (For the period ending 31 March 1965} SUBJECT: Mr. David E, Murphy 1. This report is the first full year report of Mr. Murphy's performance as Chief of the SR Division, 2. Perhaps his greatest contribution during this past year has been the energizing of the Division's several components with a consequent very noticeable increase in the efforts of the Clandestine Services as a whole against our Soviet targets. Mr, Murphy's ° enthusiasm and imagination have been contapious, and we are ag a result profiting from his sound approach te the role and mission of his Division, He has fully understood the fact that the SR Division cannot alone discharge the responsibilities of the Clandestine Services - for intelligence and counter-intelligence activity against our Soviet requirements, but must harness the interest and the energies of all the area divisions. In this respect, Mr. Murphy is achieving nothing short of remarkable success. His arrangements with DODS are also improving the quality of that Division's work in the SR field, while his general administration of his Division from a managerial point of view has continued to be excellent. 3. The overall evaluation of Mr. Murphy's performance during | this past year, including his regard for cost and manpower factors, is outstanding. It is because of the quality of this performance that favorable consideration has been given in principle to the gradual investment of an increasing portion of the inanpower asgets of the Clandestine Services to his Division. His plans and his accomplish- ments todate justify confidence that these increases are being well invested and will provide a maximum return, 7 ~“, ° i LOVA ATO atin, Thomas H. Karamessines Assistant Deputy Director for Plans
14-00000 1 April 1965 Fitness Report - Mr. David E. Murphy Reviewing Official: Richard Helms Deputy Director for Plans [ have noted thia report. David EB. Murphy
SIR ET IER ORR AN EY LST RRL LET UTE TP TIT TCR AA I Ne IT ER LINE RITE C7 a ALPEN NE PES COI EEE URGTRTAE ate AER PONRT SOsah  efharaectree e SECRET {Ode" Tatled Ts? EMPLUOPEE SEREAL MUMNMER FITNESS REPORT . 056700 SECTION A | GENERAL “Vwame (Pirates (Wikies) Pi pare oe gare [Fo one la Geaue [8. .o.CUCUCFTTTTTTS Murphy David E, ! 1 oA GS-17 | OD ‘CURAENT STATION Headquarters ay, QEe CW OR OF ASSIC WDP/SR S. OF FECHAL PasrTiOn TITLE Ops Officer - Di ee iat Tyee OF 7 BRS wisGwark (kee inalewctiong + Sectim v) PARMAR Bane Pseectan (Spectlyas 18. REPORTING PERIL: (Pecan ton} 1 4. e.i 11. GATE REPORT CUE IN AP, 30 April 1964 ™ | L April 196% © 31 March 1964 SECTION BO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION We Weok Performance rongas from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satiefaceay, A rating In this category requires Positive remedial action. The asture of the action could range from eaunceling, to fuether training, to placing on probation. to reassignment or to seperation, Deractibe action token or proposed tn Section C. : A» Adequate Performance moots all requirements. It la entialy sotiafactory ond is charactoriszed nelther by deflelency noe excellence. - . P > Praficlent  Porformance fa more thon sotlafsctory, Desired coaults are bolng produced in a proficient manner, $+ Strong Performance In characterized by excoptional proficiency. O + Qytatonding Performance is ao exceptional in relation to raquiremants of the work and In comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as te warrant apoctal recognition. : -— SPECIFIC DUTIES List up fo aly of the moat important specific dutias pachormed duting the rating period. Ineer? rating latter which beat describes the manner in which employee parforms EACH specitic duty. Consider ONLY oflectiveness in gorfarmance of that duty. All employees with supervisory reaponaibilinies MUST be rated on their ability te supervise (indicate number of ompinyeoe superviaed). SPacieic CUTTY NO. ? a ce Ra Ting SPHCiPIC Gury NO a : i REYTEeR oc ee nn ce tt rer Sn eg tte nee neers ene SPECIFIC OUTY NOY : ot f RATING : | terres rw . , t y | RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 | Serres co en re SPECIFIC DUTY NO. ce f RATING | SETTER | SPECIFIC DUTY NOX 8 —_ ~ — ~ RATING j SETTER : | ee _ __ | ee OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT. POSITION == ee wae : } Aating Take Inte occount over sthing about the omployea which influences hit atHectiveness In hie cuscant position such os pore formance of ayecitec duties, productivity, conduct an job, cooperatirensaa, pertinent parsanel traits oe habits, and particular limitations of taienta, Based on your drvwledye of emeloree’s overall partarmance dusting the rating period, plece the lertes in the rating bea corre apanding fe The sigtoment which wast ccewately evlloces his lavel of petlormanca, | Oo . t + | GRTP EH bar” 45° casovava paguicus colrione. SECRET ; SEES, TRA
14-00000 L April 1964 MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF ANNUAL FITNESS REPORT .. (For the period ending 31 March 1964) SUBJECT: Mr. David E. Murphy 1. Mr. Murphy relinquished his dutics aa Chief, Eastern Europe Division in September 1963 and took over his present respon- Sibilltiea as Chief of the SR Division at that time. Thig report covers the period from | April. 1963 tothe present and thus includes comments on his performance as Chief, EE Division and Chief, SR Division. 2. Mr. Murphy combines an extraordinary talent for this work “with a considerable and varied experience init. His previous report indicated that he wag turning in an outstanding performance in dealing with the affairs of the EE Division, and he continued this level of his performance in the firat six months covered by this report, A general reorganization of senior officers in the Clandestine Services offered the opportunity to put Mr. Murphy in charge of the division which he had long aspired to direct and for which position he was eminently qualified, both Inguistically and by field expericace. He ia showing excellent results in refurbishing the Division and giving it new Hie and impetus. His considerable energies enable him to give an out- standing performance in managing and directing his Division's affairs while at the same time engaging personally and most actively in a number of very important Divisional cases. His competence includes awareness of the need for keeping his costa down and gettiny the maximum from his manpower. He is showing imagination and initiative and is probably the best qualified and best prepared olficer ever to head the Division. Thomas H, Karamessines Assintant Deputy Director for Plans Reviewing Official: Abed Thavg noted the above report. Richard Helma Deputy Director for Plana