datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
* _ +, UNITED STATES coven@enr. SO © ‘ ‘ ~ | «Memorandum .- TO >: Chief, Appraisal Section . i. DATE? a Vb, 6 Ss FROM ; I. I. Thompson Appraisal Section supjecr: HUNT, Everette Howard, Jr. . -1. Subject is currently employed as Ops Officer, GS-15, DDP/CA Staff, Office of the Chief. Under the reinvestigation program checks were scheduled at -FBI (bud from 21 Sept. 1949) and at CSC and police and credit checks in Washington, D. C., area; results of these checks were reported negatively. A review of Subject's file has been made to determine if a special polygraph interview is in order. 2. Subject has been employed by this Agency and predecessor agencies since 1945. He was polygraphed in 1953 with favorable results. Subject was re-polygraphed in January 1957 in connection with his certification -. to the Department of State _ Questions were satisfactorily resolved and interview disclosed no reactions indicative of deception to any of the questions asked. Ap- proval for integration into the Department of State and his assignment as Chief of Station, Montevideo, Uruguay was granted. 3. Information contained in Subject's file indicates possibility that he attempted to cancel his transfer from (Montevideo! by political maneuvering. The president of Urugusy)reportedly indicated his intention, in private ~ conversation with President Eisenhower, to request cancellation of Subject's transfer from Montevideo. 4. Polygraph was waived upon Subject's return, 20 June 1960. . On 22 June 1960 approval was granted for Subject's assignment to JMARC,. At this time all, information of an unfavorable hature was considered. 5. Information was received 5 November 1960 from{Montevideo) indicating that Subject had, in personal correspondence with contacts there, (certain (Uruguayan) officials) been indiscreet relative to his activities in connection with the Cuban problem. Memorandum dated 2h Jan. 1961 to Chief, SRS/OS recommended that Subject be given a strong warning concerning indiscreet remarks and unauthorized disclosure of information; file did not indicate that any action was taken. « eloep y “819828 Ero aseratte
14-00000 a 6. In September 1961 EE/YA requested-and obtained: ‘permission for Subject to re-establish social contact with a member of the’ ional purposes. ocial contact with this individual, }) dated back to 1958 when both were stationed in(Montevideo) their wives were also social contacts. 7. In November 1962 Subject's request for approval of his wife's proposed part-time employment by the Spanish Embassy was denied by OS as incompatible with Subject's Agency employment. A memorandum for the record, dated 19 November 1962, indicated possibility that Subject might appeal this decision; however, Subject's file reflects no appeal to date. 8. There would appear to be no significant security aspects which would require further exploration. It is recommended, therefore 3 vChat Subject be afforded a routine re-polygraph. e Le Thompson Appraisal Section LUD :mjs Con cd R&R Ad [63 YP foc cf TR s Cw
\ [104-10119-1009, rE STATES ms seta “6 Memorandum -# enraene 2 to |: Chief, ‘Personnel, Security Division, 0S —s_p..,. 14 November 1962 THROUGH :Chief, Employee Activity Branch/PSD/OS °. ee From : H. R- Dugan/EAB , . —— ; : _ SUBJECT: Everette Howard (#23500) - Wife's Possible Enployment by Embassy. t . REF: Memorandum dated 11/7/62 from Subject. $2 1. Subject, Chief, R&P/DODS/DD/P, who has{____Jcover, indicates that his wife, Mrs. Dorothy L. Hunt (#35576), has been employed by Communications Consultants International (OS-NR) which firm does public relations work for thel_ The firm's-contract is to be cancelled soon and acquaintances at the have suggested to Mrs. Hunt that she help them on a part-time basis doi translations, statistical research and occasional letters for the ZY Subject indicates also that most of this work would be done_at home and . ney coneurrence, his wife had worked for tne(__}# | | during 1955-56. Subject_requests Security appro for his wife to accept employment with the(| 24 there is no. indication that the request has been coordinated with the Chief, DONS. a) "2. Mr. (centr Cover Group, advised that there were no cover objections he proposed action. 3. Memorandum dated 1/24/57 to DC/PSD from Bruce Solie in Bubject's file indicates that the employment of Mrs. Runt by the 2 iv? had been ‘approved by the Security Officer(_ sd, Subjects _ fiie cates that he has been a continuing seuurity problem because of a a tendency to disregard regulations and established procedures. OS File #35576 on Subject's wife indicates that she __ 2L£ 4, The proposed employment of Subject's wife yf. 2 unless for operational reasons, appears to be incompatible with Subject 's’ emp Loype Bnet. In addition, although.Mr. Hunt has official cover, his Agency{eduld' be ‘ascertained with resultant embarrassment to the Subject, the Agency or the nation. Accordingly, it is recommended that Subject 's request be sec ty disapproved. | eiaae JR. R. Dug M- Wie ae [ot rr Va a - yp FT SEG e% . Reey Hn oe sessing pa,
404-10119-10100 ot ° SENDiik WILL CHECK CLAS - ‘CATION TOP AND BOTTOM UNCLASSIFIED |_| /NFIDENTIAL | VI SECRET | CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP ea ACTION J DIRECT Reply |” TPREPARE REPLY |__| APPROVAL |__| oisparc RECOMMENDATION OL hi tiaten hl, bs Sa FROM: NAME, ADDRESS ANo PHONE NO. | pate VA ms Replaces Form 30-4 FORM NO. 23 7 (40) {APR 55 which may be used. “U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1955—O-342531
14-00000 ‘MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD ” SIGNATURE FORM ROUP 1 F= G2 1954 Excuupen rou avnousne (40) G SSiF ICATION SOU RORADNS ae val
[roe-tort9-toror}_ 2h ‘Chief, DODS/DD/P _ “HUNT, Everette Howard - Possible Exployment f Wife by| I) 24 Memorandun dated 7 November 19C from Subject _ to Chief, EAB/PSD/OS. 1. Mr. Hunt requests approval for his wife, who is not eaployed by the Agency, to accept part-time employment with the ln4 2. It is the view of this Office that the proposed activity is incompatible with Mr. Hunt's Agency earployment and could result in official eubarrassment. Accordingly, the request is disapproved froa the standpoint of security. ‘Distribution: Sheffield Edcwarés Director of Security Orig. & 1 ~ Addressee _1 -0S File #23500 © “T= 08 File #35576 1 - EAB (OA). 1 - Chrono: — sana 7
> 7 November 1962 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, EAB/PSD/0S ATTENTION t Mee Harry Dugan SUBsECT 2 Employment of Bpouse - Mre. Dorothy 1. Hunt 1. For the past seven months my wife bas been employed locally by Communications Consultants International (CCI), a public relations subsidiary of McCann-Erickson, the New York advertising firm. 2. MeCann-Erickson, through CCI, has held t public relations account for the past year, but the 24 is ebout_to, cancel the account and do the work itself. Acquaintances at the | bhave suggested that my wife help them on a part- time basis by doing tranglations. etatistical research and eccasional — setters for the PuMost of the work could be accomplished et bome and at ny é*3 & ence, making the employment desirable and almost unique ag jobs for women go. eoncurrence, my wife worked for the . pong es end though her currently«projec = 24 he intelligence implications of he employment, I an assuning that there would be no objection to Her perrorn- ing the partetime work desoribed. 4. The concurrence of your office is requested. HOWARD HUNT pops/RaP Distribution . Orig & 1 = Addressee “Nie fe Group 7 Excluc’--' f “2 aviomatic
14-00000 - HESGMY ~ haptar gelmte ‘autltoa's toachy wists, swith com members’: po the Frente; ‘othe Guatemala training bases. Their breakfast conversa-« * - ons-with President ‘Ydigoras are described. -This breakfast gives the author ” _ @ ¢hance'te veflect back on the CIA role in the overthrow of Guatemalan. -'* _ 5. President Agbens: “He recalls the three exiled leaéers of Guatemala, his . owe support for Dr. ‘Cordova to head the new government, and State's veto. 7 - “:-e@f Col. Yéigovas.as “vagusly authoritarian.” At a crocial moment, however, ~~ tr. Cordova had to undergo cancer surgery and therefore could not be wolectad;: _ _ the choice fell.on Castillo Armas. New ‘Falgores was President bal wae ‘eub- : ‘Credible allegations of his cctions during the invasion a Projects:nad that “Credible allegations of Me octicne Sot ere led). - ‘Saforieauin polomice of Frente cial Pony Verona, ar0 as well as the initial — l L&=@#f
(041011940112 RENDER WILL CHECK CLASSIFIGr SION. ie = “ BS are @CONFIDENTIAL ‘Se CENT ‘wratien eC {OFFICIAL ROU Baa Mg ag GARR NE Bo Tay EBON IE oe es le FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO GP EE AAT betes [ conFIpENTIAL [7] sEcuerS =e 1 Foam wo. § 237 Re ot ; 0) _TAPR 55 which may be used. - U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1993-—~O-242581
14-00000 ~ tee sy . Office Memorandum « UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ‘ro : Chief, Security Research Staff, (OS : parr: 24 January 1961 mom: Shietnp/ens/0s ; = : SUBJECT: Everett Howard HUNT, J Ye #23500 ae ea Attached is a copy of a cable which was brought to my attention by Mr. O'Neal, Cl/SIG.,.. Mr. Horton had requested that Mr.- O'Neai check .conce rning any ‘information ‘developed by the Office of Security. | - - The attached cable. indicates that Subject is furnishing information ‘of a-type, ‘which he should not be. furnishing, to certainfUsuguayay) officials whom he Presumably knew during 1 previous agaignment saat Lt me piolieficcy wt The cable also appears 1 to ) raise the question concerning how OG Subject could recently purchase. a.$70, 000 home in ‘Washington, .D. Cc. ;. a A check of Subject file indicates that Subject has some outside income , since he has written a number of “Pocket | books" and has certain ne corporation stocks. The following Security action is recommended: @): credit checks bé. conducted on Subject ‘in the. ‘Washington, “D. C. area and information obtained in regard to his — -Andicated purchase. ‘of @ home. dnciuding financial Srzangements, : eo) Appropriate o als of J MARC be briefed concerning ‘the ‘:ilnformation -r. Bickteided) and.a discreetinguiry - made concerning whether Subject.is making. other indiscreet | ‘remarks and statements concerning his current assignment. Subject has been a problem j in the past and apparently continues to be a problem. If information can be obtained other than the cable information which apparently could not be used, it is felt that Subject should be given at least.a strong warning concerning indiscreet remarks and unauthorized disclosure of information. a « Attachment as noted above. ; Se TN GRD al oh “ os/ens/siste = gem iO)
14-90000 | 25 NOVEMBER 1960 DIRECTOR /t. [wonTEW ! IbEo] CLASSIFIED MESSAGE © << - §# y DIR RYBAT FUDUST -1.ZAVCANE 1 VOLUNTEERED DURING Bc é THAT HE HAD JUST RECEIVED LETTER FROM /. SAID FAMILY NOW SETTLED WASHINGTON, HaYe BOUGHT". 1,008 Y "HOUSE TRACY PLACE, WASH; AND THAT am worn inc ON CUBAN IRvtaNE. 1. Od 2. “ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGOLAV.CANE 1 REMARKED 1g ODAC LD 4 | AWARE COS HEAD KUBARK [HHONT HAVING REPLACED amyaiiiligs, ¢ 36 /AvADo 1 ALSO HAS REMARKED Tom “QM CUBAN MATTER, ~~. : aed (OTe od. 4. -BOTHCAVCANE- 1 “AND(AVADO 1 CLEARED STATION CONTAL Paes 2 * CONCERNED Cae, NOR SUFFICIENTLY WELL TRAINED sceunigy ff _-BHAREMESS KUBARK CONDUCTING OPS AGAINST CASTRO. A _ REQUEST UTMOST DISCRETION INVESTIGATION THIS gd lie ee ;
[totorto-orta] @ = @ Re - a ee iin “ —T — . ‘erahioann FORM NO. 64 Off Memorandn aso STATES 1 cownnwumwy File pare: § August 1960 FROM: C. H. Pennington 7 fA susject: (Veronica Effie MOPETT-HILL) HUNT, Howard - #23572 om Alien Registration Receipt Card in the name Veronica Effie MOPErT- HILL (A 12 194 530), showing subject was admitted to the U. 8S. on 1 August 1960, at New York City, as a type "0-1" and has been 03 duly registered according to law, was delivered to 80/WH Div. * u? ff 7 SECRET REV Uri iv CiA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce
[ro4-10119- {011 pron no, 64 “Off be Memorandun 3 ae NITED STATES GOVERNMENT To .* File ° Oh : DATE: _2 August 1960 FROM : ete, ‘Alten affairs § staff SUBJECT: MOFFERT min, Veronica Effie, born 26 December 1941 - ‘Montevideo de stated the subject entered the U. 5. with her -emp. r Howa fant. She was admitted as an "0-1" immigrant (native of erica) and will depart with him in the near future. “ire franted to know what would be necessary to | - document her for the two-year assignment overseas. 2. He was informed she would need only her passport and a Reentry Permit. ¢. E. Pennington  0S/AAS/CHP:es 2 Aug 60 RETURN TO CIA Background Use’ Only Do Not Reproduce SECRET Li
YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRAVEL AND INCUR NECESSARY EXPENSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATIONS. .THIS TRAVEL OR- CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION, IF SQ DESIGNATED, IS MADE FOR OFFICIAL PURE ITINERARY, MODE OF TRAVEL AND PURPOSE Montevideo, Truguay to lashington, 5.C. BOE: Mix, See, Come Cetecier ES AND NOT FOR YOUR PERSONAL CONVENIENCE, — TRAVEL DURATION PER DIEM ALLOWANCE AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE @ Rey & dune ns". 40 OTHER _(See below) MON CARRIER | TO Gov't. ALLOWANCES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS WITH REASONS eathorised te be dipped te the Station. (Approximately 8000 lbs.) | DEPENDENT TRAVEL AUTHORIZED PROCURE TRANSPORTATION BY ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL | _NAME —___| DATE OF BIRTH] RELATIONSHIP | | TRANSPORTATION REQUEST DISPOSITION OF EFFECTS AUTHORIZATION “Jenene | OREO — TY FUNDS ARE AVANABLE p CE EREN 3, ee . Tafe Oh & SHIPMENT POA AUTHORIZED EXCESS BAGGAGE AUTHORIZED ACCOMPANIED UNACCOMPANIED (8S AND MODE . | LBS AND MODE ADVANCE OF FUNDS REQUESTED ACCOUNTING DUE DATE FORM §4f) OBSOLETE Gaa-46) 3-89 PREVIOUS MFG Sse EDITIONS.
404-10419-10125 4 - S IETURNTC CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce
NO wa BE asa Ne = CLASSIFIED MESSAGE Leow ® \ Bas/GK \B8 FEB 196 “SECRET DIRECTOR ~ _ . 5 ‘ ~ a) . ° aa cis Boe _ FROM : (Monte v£D10) ; Peo - _ ™ REOH cect ke Ske feet ACTION: C/WH 2 - ~ CRs D0/P, CoP, A/0D/P/P, C/ci, C/ct/oPs 2, poutine - | IN 38978 TO DIR INFO. . cite { MONT 393? ! RYBAT JMVIVE | f _ ACCORDING TO” AMBASSADOR na a a = | STATED THAT DURING HIS PRIVATE TALK WITH PRESIDENT EISENHOWER 4 HE INTENDS TO REQUEST PRESIDENT EISENHOWER TO CANCEL <Semaamay TRANSFER PERMIT REMAIN IN PRESENT CAPACITY. | END OF MESSAGE of ; REPRODUCT ion BY Y OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS § PROHIBITED. ‘
we we 4 « [tomtorttoag] LEGO Cer 1 &; in wegly cater te Deer Hr. Hunts | ie ave dafersed Geri the Eeoerd of demuediy Violatlot tare Gabel degerh 0, Le someraies the security violation for which you have encepted reqponsibility, hes been forwarded to the Office af Pereomnel for eppropriste esticn. Sincerely yours, Biviaion vinlon ot Foyetea) Besurtty op Oftioe of Security ie, Howard Hunt, dr, Aserican . Af/- 2 +f [x 2 eoguey. RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Distribution: Do Not Reproduce se « Addresses ) : . = 8Y/f (pluss 2 lec = ro foctereo al /-2 lec » 30, Alres S0A:SY/P sMiGrokicon rle ay | DB
[lotorieaonsit— | gf - 2 Fd SEE, ; bs OFFICE TRAVEL ORDER NO. , f ee ee eECRET B5Go SE bey MWe Vat ORDER vance SHE a U 7. CERTBRL PRES Lo 8/3387-83-055 NAME OFFICE PHONE GRADE AND SALARY ~ TITLE : we : AL “STATION... YOU ARE-HEREBY AUTHORIZEDTO TRAVEL, AND INCUR. NECESSARY EXPENSES “iN secnSatiod wins AGENCY REGULA REGULATIONS; : mene, organ Senta, 2 mt ert teste, rage ee : sas eyige — . fi 2 Do N SPECIAL PROVISIONS UNELUDE APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION) AUTHORIZED PER DIEM COORDINATION, AS REQUIRED (TO BE EFFECTED BY ORIGINATING OFFICE) ; () oove [J OTHER OPERATIONAL AREAS [7] treater CLEARANCE (iF OBTAINABLE) ae ; ADVANCE OF FUNDS 1S AUTHORIZED. : fa ESTIMATED .COST OF TRAVEL, $ 7 CERTIFICATION (sy prc . oo TERMINATING APPROXIMATELY CERTIFIED A TRUE Copy. SIGNED COPY-.ON FILE IN CENTRAL me PROCESSING BRANCH. REVIEWED. NO CHANGE NECESSARY. AMENDED AS INDICATED. ‘IF APPLICABLE fa) CENTS PER MILE, NOT TO EXCEED COST-BY COMMON ‘CARRIER ) . "SIGNATURE ~ “ CENTS PER MILE, as geinc:more. ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE ‘GOVERNMENT wee THE CHANGE OF OFFICIAL STATION INDICATED 1S EFFECTED IN THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT FOR YOUR PERSONAL. GONVERIENCE. iN CONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF STATION, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSPORT YOUR IMMEDIATE. FAMILY, ‘YOUR HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL EFFECTS, suB-: : JECT.TO WEIGHT LIMITS, RESTRICTIONS AND PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH IN. AGENCY REGULATIONS. oo ~ - uo 8 TRAVEL TO FIRST POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTATION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL EFFECTS. AND -.- AUTOMOBILE 1S AUTHORIZED. ne, | CERTIFY FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE RETURN FROM POST OF DUTY ABROAD, INCLUDING EXPENSES OF TRANSPORTA- OBLIGATION REFERENCE NO. CHARGE ALLOTMENT NO. TION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, PERSONAL EFFECTS AND ; AUTOMOBILE, is > AUTHORIZED. ; . a . DATE SiG DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL WITH EMPLOYEE. DEPENDENTS TO TRAVEL|WITHIN 6 MOS. OF EMPLOYEE. JOU: 0 oo 0 TEMPORARY DUTY. “Peo NAME AND TITLE OF OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING TRAVEL Ree topes vetpni iets rR se 540 ossoitre Paci: Eatin
[towtortotorsz, c ’ - fo RR |) § AEA oe “Director of Security ; Director of Personnel FRO =: Chief, Communications Security Division SUBJECT: Notification of Cryptegraphic Clearance - Hunt, &, Howard, Ure - 1. Subject employee has been granted a cryptographic clearance: ~ under rovis of Cla Regulation 90-500, Clearance is effective 20 Vetdiary WY 7s oo 2.° Subject has ‘been informed of the granting of clearance, has been briefed concerning cryptographic and related communications security matters, and has signed a Briefing Statement acknowledging responsibility for the protection of cryptographic information, 3. When Subject employee no longer requires the clearance in order 'to perform his assigned duties, it is requested that the Communications Security Division (2411 I Bldg., Ext. 3021) be notified by Val a » SO that the clearance may be revoked. FOR. THE CHIEF, COsiiUNICATIONS: V Distrihytion: 1 ~ Security Office (Briefing Statement Attached) wo - =o CIA. 1 ~ Personnel (Wing 1-H Curie Hall) | RETURN te only. 1 = 0C-S/PROT File ‘Backgroun C~O-E-E-LD-EN-T-IA-L 2 etl aa ce 7 tA Aa + distill SA at ein asa itch Tat chaalttn meiemerccntininn on, Oe eaten EIT AY me 208 A ie Mette nee poo meee gee, mall
a ae | CONFOENTIAL (L CONFIDENTIAL. . o ° . eo. No. " CRYPTOGRAPHIC CLEARANCE ~ “BRIEFING STATEMENT about to be authorized to have custody of, access to, or knowledge of KUBARK staff cryptographic material or information, and fully understanding that the preservation of the security of cryptographic material or information is vital” to the national interests of the United States, do solemly swear (or affirm) - and declare without any mental reservations whatsoever that I-will protect the | security of such material or information to the best of my ability, and that I will not disclose such material or information to any unauthorized person. I f understand that the only persons authorized to have custody of, access to, or i knowledge of KUBARK staff cryptographic material or information are those who | hold a current KUBARK cryptographic clearance and need the specific material or information for the proper performance of their official duties, \ | 1. I, (print) £& how Ae on), bse. 2. I further swear (or affirm) that I will also protect. to the best of my ability the security of the cryptographic material or information of other U. S. Government agencies should I gain possession or knowledge of such material . or information as the result of my performance of KUBARK cryptographic duties or in any other manner, . 1041011940133 ‘ we ALLLT ‘ $ O00 ke 4 3. I will thoroughly familiarize myself with the pertinent commmications security regulations, instructions, and principles which govern the proteotion of cryptographic material or information. I will at all times provide the re- quired degree of physical security in the handling of the material to ensure that it does not fall into unauthorized hands or be exposed to or otherwise { be made known to unauthorized persons. a . | 4 I have read the provisions of Public Law 513 of 3 May 1950. I under~ : . stand that I am bound by that Act, both presently and also after the termination : of my employment with KUBARK and/or the revocation of my cryptographic clearance, ’ I fully understand that improper disclosure or loss of cryptographic material i or information could subject me to punishment under the provisions of that Act, or as provided by the appropriate regulations and practices of KUBARK. t 5. I understand that a cryptographic clearance is not a permanent clear- : ance, that it will be revoked immediately should I fail to maintain the required i security standards, or for lack of need or for other substantial reasons, I understand that revocation of my cryptographic clearance bars me automatically from further access to cryptographic information, but does not release me from my obligation to protect the security of cryptographic information, the know- ledge of which I might still retain. RETURNTO CIA . CONFIDENTIAL Background Use Only. Do Not | Reproduce CONFIDENTIAL
ee , S  SeE-C-R-E-T oo Ua\ _— CRYPTOGRAPHIC CLEARANCE FORM i Vira Z * bs Supyecr: _E Hoverd “HUET oo COMPONEN . (wE Div.) SLBARANC. REQUESTED FOR: A, GRYPTO TRAINING ANU oFaRarron (. oe) ; B. ACCESS ONLY % . permease ) TO 3 Chief, Personnel Security Division, 0S. - DATES. 90 Femmary 2997 FROM: Chief, Communications Security Division It is requested that this office be advised whether the Subject ‘employee meets current minimum standards for a cryptographic clearance, and whether the Security Office concurs in granting such a clearance. FOR THS CHIEF, COMMUNICATIONS: | QS TO : Chief, Communications Security Division Date: ) [0 Is? © FROM: Chief, Personnel Security Division, 0S ie This is to advise that Subject meets the current requirements for cryptographic clearance and that tnere is no objection to such clearance. Employee is U.S. Citizen: (Yes) (Qc7 (Strike out one) waployee's spouse is U.S. Citizen: (Yes) die} {strike out one) TO 3 Chief, Fersonnel Security Division, 0S Dates 20 Dafeamay (IF7 FROM: Chief, Communications Security Division the attached cryptogranhic clearance briefing statement signifies that Subject accepted the conditions and responsibilities contingent upon granting of the clearance, Clearance is effective as of the. date shown on the briefing statement. It is requested that the briefing statement be » placed in the appropriate file maintained by your Office 1 seatnenpteestn = anemia Cryptographic clearance revoked as of Reason for revocation ORAS NNN atest eect uct mr’ S~E-C-K-E-T GA RETURN TO Background Use Only “Do Net ot Reproace
404-101 19-10142 ° MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 4 . . ; a tie Gib, a 4% \ 28 May 1976 SUBJECT: NWNUNT, &. Wowava & A> SOS 1. On 15 April 1976 the Japanese Communist Party (JCP) held a press conference in Tokyo and distributed a "handout" containing Subject's name as one of many U.S. Government officials alleged to be affiliated with the CIA. Although the JCP named some bona fide Agency employees, many were bona fide State Department employees or employees of other government agencies who had previously been listed in Who's Who in CIA. 2. The purpose of this memorandum is to document the security files of those Agency,employees named by JCP as being formerly assigned to the | } plus those State Depart- ment employees for whom a security file exists. It should be noted that the Directorate of Operations is currentiy in the process of y notifying those Agency employees formerly assigned to of their inclusion in the JCP list. 3. For complete details concerning the JCP exposure, the reader is referred to a memorandum dated 6 May 1976, subject: - Exposure of CIA Personnel, which is located in the security file of the same title, #601 818, Volume VIII. Cited memorandum ,2-? : those Agency employees currently assigned to the and contains pertinent Cablés relating to the JCP exposure. 4, Comments: ReAriced GS3-\8 ope Oficey CEO AREAS) , Assigned +o Taran \AS4-Sb. Listed \m_ EAR vow Ao CMonaruedes) | moeln WAERGATE. Worockerry , _ RETURN TO Cla QoQ to Ry Con Background Use Only Michael E. Schneeberger Oo Not Reproduce Security Analysis Group ann Gaeeaal w E2 IMPDET Siaticn dk CL BY 007472 Aa