datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
104: 4034 10011] — CLASSEBICATION O1SPAICod SYMBOL AND NO Pat otc) __ DISPATCH “SRT | ames ® ; ie . HEADQUARTERS FRE NS as ; “ * Chief of Station, Ravana . f = WEA: Chief, Wi Diviaion 4 Ah -  36-126-0 3 : . FROM — £ fa sat amen a + sons baie ae arin _ ” - is “ayy (CMECR OX ONT) e| ie — cae to have Chinese Communists ar To ting __ NO INDEXING REQUIRED ACTION REQUIRED 7 ; ee eee INDEXING CAN BE JUDGED . . co ones ay QUALUFHED HG. OFS% ONLY oS eT ee ed SL  -----. REP:. HAVA $062, dated 25 June 1960” 1. The proposal submitted in the reference is interesting and worth  gerlous coneideration. Several possible ideas have occurred to us on how we can mount this. type of operation. As yet, however, none of theese has: ' been worked through sufficiently to prepare @ definite pian of action. . Kevertheless, it appears to us that any effort that would carry conviction . would have to be based on detailed knowledge of the “proposed victim's" ' babite, movements, and exposures to the public, providing a basis for tim- ing @n attack and selecting a site from which an attempt could be made. In - abort, the seme information ‘ia needed aa. would be required if an actual asengsination attempt were contemplated. It would be belpful if sketches a and mapa eonld be prepared to show routes of travel, time intervals, places _ - of vantage, aites of police stations, routes of escape, location of safe | gites, primary and alternate means of exfiltrating after the attempt, loca- tions of sites for caching the weapon and for picking up travel documents. . uch materiale could then be worked into en operation attributable to # the © Chinese Communists by the introduction of suitable Chinese touches, would provide documentary support to the prim facie evidence of the fu funds combined rumor and “evidence” will readily be detected as a provocation. | We therefore suggest that you draw together the information described above ena forwaré it to Headquarters to be processed far use in mounting this operation, obi Msg ek CAN AIC sce g “CHESTER D. DAINOLD | OLIVER G. GALBOND Distribution: Grig. &1 - Havana 1 - WE/h 2 - FE/6H/CA cman, fer, & L - RID/DeP : ' tataie__ im (8 July 1960) CLAgbiE ATI USE PREVIOUS LOTOtd ere FiTiCe a 2. We believe that without the authentication described above, the | - : | | { i} | l _) PEPLACES FOB Hy ab fee | ae 51-78, 51-284 AND $177 & 7 LL conmute WHICH ASE OSSCLETE. a § .. :
ie 1038 10015). TOP SECHET 7 September 1961 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Consideration of the Cuban Matter by the $412 Special Group 1. Attached are my detailed notes made while reading the minutes of the Special Group yesterday. The 12 pp. paper that wH/ submitted to the Taylor Committee, with two appendices, is also attached in order to facilitate study of the matter. That paper purported to quote the minutes only with reference to the strike force concept. (It should be replaced in the two wo/ k bound volumes of papers furnished the Taylor Committee, at ‘ “Part FF.") 2. I call attention to the following new matters, which Suggests a number of points that should be reflected in my draft gancvet report of 31 August 1961: a. Parrott was the Assistant to DD/P - for Executive Branch Matters (DD/P/EBM). He not only acted as secretary of Special Group, and briefed the DCI beforehand, but took an active role in the discussions, at least from time to time, i.e., at meetings of 8/11, 9/1, 9/8 and 11/16. This introduces still another non-operator echelon in the decision-making, between DCI and Chief, WH/4. b. These minutes show the extremely detailed reporting. ‘by CIA to the Special Group and requests for approval of individual operations, i.e., individual air drops. c. Note that the detailed reporting to the Special Group was almost always done by Bissell or Barnes, not by the DCI. d. Note Adm. Burke! s statement that Navy ideas were to have 50, 000 U.S. military for intervention in Cuba. (3/14/60 meeting) Query: was this statement in | he back of the minds of CIA operators ry) D7 in going ahead, i. eo ‘the Cuban Brigade was only a spearhead for (possible) follow-up by U.S. forces? Note in late meetings pete considerable additional talk of overt intervention. BL. es a 256 SéchET
13-00000 , TOP Shiner e. Note (8/25 meeting) reference to Barnes' assurances to Macy of Budget that it would be "out of question" to mount an invasion without participation of large numbers of disaffected individuals within the country (Cuba). f. The words "Special Discussion" e.g., 10/6 meeting old indicate in my notes discussions of sensitive A activities PIC). They are described at length in the minutes, but I took no notes on this. g. Note (11/3 meeting) State's suggesting that the three top Cubans be assassinated. =«_— hb. Note CIA was conducting a re-evaluation of the entire situation (which presumably led to the decision to go ahead with a large brigade): Should we not ask Bissell whether any memoranda of this re-evaluation are in existence? i. There is reference to Cuba being on NSC agenda for early November 1960. Should we inquire what was said at such NSC meeting? j. Note Barnes' preposterous statement (12/5) that 600 troops (in invasion) would be just as useful as 3000. k. It is clear that the pressures to get the Cuban trainees out of Guatemala were considered by the Special Group to be real and urgent. ery , Wha CCL’ 3. Will IG and GD and RBS please make additional suggestions, for inclusion in draft report? .
ar enventlde fh 104-10 cS 31540020 s STPRE CSTE ARUTOCING TRS de AWN ALES IN ee av DEAS fee 6 SUBJECT Ge ate ee ‘wore & ot 2 om, The Scerctary of State CIA Ievelvement in Cuban Ccuster- revolutionary Activities--/irrest of a) Ul ‘Rolando CUBELA Secades and Raxieon Tomas GUIN Diaz 1. With reference to the Habana Prensa Latina news release of 5 March 1955, alleging C14 involvement with Rolando CUBELA Secades and Ramon Toraas GUIN Disz in counterrevclutionary activities, the following personas. outlines the Agency's contact with these two 2. GUIN was recruited by a CIA agent in Aussi 1953 inside Cuba as a Principal Agent to recruit high-level military leaders. He has had no contact with CIA staff personnel.. = 3. GUBELA, the more important cf the two man, has been in contact with this Asency during the paricd 1951-1955. The iast Agency contact with CUBELA was in February 1965. He has had direct contact with several Ageucy officials and, in addition, is known to have been in contact with Cuban exiles, including Manuel ARTEAE. CIA's contact and reistionshin with both CUBELA and GUIN ewas for the express purpose of using them to collect intellisence on military activities and objectives in Cuba. The Agency was not involved with either of these two men in a plot to assassinate Fidel - Castro, as claimed in the Prensa Latira news release, ner did it ever encourage cither of these two persons to attempt such an act. & Mr! lmentioned in the nrese release, is 2. Spein, and was . in contact with both Odon Alvarez de la CAMPA and Jose Luis ©
13-00000 © ~ ATTAIN Ty ir ere) STONE 1? (to at wantad gee Mas we 4 - ane GuNeALIZ Gallarrcitia, as noted inthe sracs release, The 3uSsD ny ontect was limited seecitically t em dangen of Mur pose of tris contact was linaited s tScatic ally tO Currin Sane ~ +g ra! ~~ = eae b } ~ « Fly oe incelli agence imformation. There is no truth to the alleration the A . e146) a4 ioe by? ow ae al CIA paid $100, G90 or any other sizeable surn of money to aither 2 feta et 4 Fa Of Chase iddividuals. *: Fy8G ap tne ~ ” = Sem 4 ; 5. The Awency has also hec limited sates t: ras) Stan ? a) Pom bet gmt TY o Tin SarOlor Poke] contact with Joz 3c ReLRoN 3 ROTC wonbasiead DEST T SS, oat e . way *, ore w a * Garlos TE EPEDINO, aotee Za the press roleas 4 Ys/ Rict»ra Tolns . - Richard Helms *s : Deputy Director. eg . Signature Recommended: Is! — H, Xaremessines Fo PsA econ wo9 ff Deputy Director for Plans we « . * o ae A EF sé 8 om ats | . es meee CS mee ted bo wont
104-10315-10029 * SUBJECT: Cuban Revolutionary Activity in Florida — SECRET | 15 samary 1960 VESORARDUM FOR THE RECORD 1. On the evening of 4 January Mr. Rollie Atwood, Director of ICA for Latin “America, telephoned me at my home and told ma that he hed received a telephone call fron a Mr. Reed Whittel, a prominent Florida rancher end former student of his, telling Atwood that he was in touch with certain people in end seeking Be On 6 January X telephoned Atwood and told him thet in our during which time they would Biwe U. 8. edviee; that thay would have 24 aD lrgp re yt hg Cie ea og RoAeg oe
13-00000 we OO, ” fe Qo kae oon & =e the cooperation of Generalissimo Trujillo and also of the Gfomozas; shat in order to accomplish this, the interested parties would make a contribution of $5,000,000 and would be repaid at @ reasonable rate of interest by thes new Cuban Government efter 14 took over, Again, i ... .,.,, Atwood wished me to advise hin as to whet he should tell Whittel. 2 ” -¥ told Atwood that as far es I was concerned, I could not tell him to give Whittle any further advice then that which Reichhardt hed elready given him; that I knew Gillespie to be a bona fide American businessman who vas in touch with us anid with the Bureau, and that Atwood should contact John Hill and get instructions from hin. DOVE Distributions i. — “A  pRAne’y
f04-1031540040] : gee - ote - . Tab A SOURCES OF INFC=MATION Files were furnished for review by the Director of Security, the Deputy Director for Supvort, the General Counsel, the Legislative counsel, the Chier of WH Division, ent by Col. 7. C. King, rormer Chie? of WH Division. Sicsraphic files and intelligence pubdlicaticas re furnished by the Directer of Central Reference. We was not cade witting of the reason for our interest in tnem, and those who assembled them for him ware not told for whom thsy were intended. We called back four officers for interviews: Richard Bissell, Sheffield Edwards fron retirement, William Harvey from sick leave, and Nestor Senchez from nis post in Carecas. Otherwise, our interviews were confined to officers assigned to the headquarters installation. We opened each interview by referring to the Drew Pearson column of 7 March 1967, citing that as the reason for our interest in learning of plots to assassinate Castro. We told those interviewed that we were on a fact-finding mission on behalf of the Director, and that this was not the usual sort of Inspector General investigation. We asked each to name any others who were likely to have knowledge of such plots. We cautioned each not to discuss the subject of the interview with anyone eise--even others whom we might interview. aes This is a complete list of those interviewed: Desmond FitzGerald Samuel Halpern sans Bruce Cheever Jd. C. King Alfonso Rodrizuez oJ. D. Esterline Edward Gunn Howard Osborn James O'Connell Sidney Gottlieb Sheffield Edvards Richard Bissell Lawrence Houston Ray Treichler John Warner Nestor Sanchez William Harvey Cornelius Roosevelt Robert Bannerman Richard Ober
(Od A318 i 1 & “4 ope ‘s The. AQ. ACY f ao) ROUTING cn DATE * 16. DECEMBER. 1968 - wagTiN ga : nee C2 | REED SALE § St “TOU. OPIM WAVE NFO) DER SAOP HE RIOD KBE [ee a we NEBEOKER ACTING REF: WAVE 2275 (IN 17853" | — | CUBELA- WILL STILL BE BRAZIL VW DEC REQUEST TEAM BE SENT 2... UPON ARRIVAL REQUEST TEAM CONTACT ALRACY=1 (IDEN AY . ae 4 5520~ BG-Si2F | AT IDEN B. ALRACY WILL BE, ALERTED TD. ARRANGE. PUBLIG, TY. 3. FOR WAVE: —ALRACY. “CIOEN com 18 ‘LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR AVANCE AND HANDLED ALL PUBLICITY FOR ZAYAS VISIT EARLY THIS YEAR. “EXCELLENT EXPLOITATION OBTAINED. Ae PLEASE OPIM NAMES AND INFO ON TEAM. ASSUME TEAM. « ALSC ETA AND FLIGHT, NUMBER IN ORDER ALERT PRESS. ASSUME TEAM UNWITI a END OF MESSAGE | c/s COMMENT: “SDISSEMINATION wath team TO. MziP. CABLES: - - ##REQUESTED. INFORM STATION AF STUDENT TEAM, MAS | = “RE COUNTER RECEPTION. ee :
104-10315-10054 ( | SY : PIN IS CE GRD oki oma - Cc. ‘MESSAGE FORM _/6 ROUTING _ * §@] NO INDEX _ : : | FILE IN CS FILE NO. 9] 0 sufiadeiee an | owner =F ESROVEL 2272 _\eeee FZ, 5 ea /eniT 2, R, FILE _L. ; INFO. i ie) TATE, | FROM: DIRECTOR Bone, wHy /s4 &  R i -Y, C : b- WAVE Y TYPIC AMISLE~2 | ‘PLS QUERY AMISLE-2 SOONEST ON FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS : : : ; 4 1, REPORT ON RECENTLY RUMORED CONSPIRACIES TO KILL ft | oR THE CASTRO BROTHERS. : —} 2. WAS MARCOS RODRIGUEZ REALLY EXECUTED? ‘WHEN? 3 @ =: 3. WHAT IS NEW IN THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN CHOMON AND oRDOQUI? P 6 ; /3 WovbY ja ©. 4, WHAT IS ANIBAL ESCALANTE S NEW JOB? 0/4 4 br 003 roe ae iz 2. 5. "REPORT ON THE Sou m THE CTC WHICH IS SAID TO HAVE _ DEVELOPED AT THE SEPTEMBER eee MEETING. 6. WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION IN THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE OLD AND NEW COMMUNISTS IN CUBA? “WHO LEADS EACH SIDE? WHO IS WINNING? 7. REPORT ON THE MILITARY OFFICERS ER ECU <3oOo ~~ "WHO WERE THEY OR HOW MANY WERE THEY?) WHAT ¢ : WERE THEY LOCA2D? WHO TRIED THEM? ~ BRUCE ’B. CHEEVER ~~ ams DC/WH/SA C/WH/SA/MOB /FT CC WH/INTEL- _ eeueneine eorieen /37 af PE 13890 ake SE WON ill ealiie le he GS eR zoo aa ice A oy er’ bis) a OY So be are rae meee Eee GBT Feat ee Roem atten + 1 !
104-10315-10061 ce CLASSIFIED MESSAGE. /f- 12-0-15 te B. EB. Retciicerdt /nlet__—. 7, ROUTING iat OAM/L/ET VS” . | secret 5, a 73 extn 2065. «601 .] es 4 gates 13 Decenber 1460 Ar) es v3 To + HAVANA INFO JMWAVE = (8S | ocresneo 3Mec6d 23 19z ; V/ AA N * €ROM: DIRECTOR flo KY | frourie . OUT 5260! Lo. | | QUT52604 sg, ON hore! INFO+ |DOP, COP, ADDP/A, WH 3, S/C 2 REF HAVA 7133 (IN 14488) oR 1. JULIO 1080, OPINION OF. FAVORABLE DESPITE FEELING ON PART SOME IN CUBAN BANKING CIRCLES HAT VECIANA MAY. BE IN SERVICE G25. LOBO yx FEELS VECIANA NECESSARILY WALERO VERY BARROW CHALK LINE WATCH MADE RIM - “SUSPECT, VECIANA WAS CHOSEN ‘ADMINISTER FUND FOR UNDERGROUND WHICH BANKERS | AGREED ESTABLISH BUT BANKS TAKEN OVER BEFORE 37 SET UP. 2. IH ANY CASE AGREE HAVA SHOULD NOT IN ANY, WAY ENCOURAGE RADICAL, " SommEs THIS KIND PARTICULARLY WHEN PRESENTED THIS COLD APPROACH Mi MANNER. | | ACCORDINGLY PREFER NO ACTION ON VISAS. 3. FOR WAVE: REQUEST ATTEMPT VERIFY VECIANA CONNECTION AMBANG ORG. | END OF MESSAGE WH Comment? *Ref stated VECIANA informed Hava of plot to wipe out Prime Minister and top associates. VECIANA seid needed visas for “* of families of men assigned to job. Rw [hla A J C. KING. q. - Lg wdc gh. COOLOINATING EEE “tg eeLeasino O@eices . . me . scmrosucwoldy OTHER THAN THE Tess Sree is protiterreD. a ne tk A mee RRO 8 omen aN se = ARs ABM Ae none a ee
LE) = DEPAT | oon = i SAARKED FOR INDEXING chief of Stat ion, ar INDEXING REQUIRED ONLY QUAUIED DESK CAN JUDGE INDEXING : | Division po MICROFILM squest For Release of Warren Commission Document ACTION REQUIRED « REFERENCES 1. Y¥OFIRY has been requested by an G@ustralian newspaper 2 Sn te (Attachuent A). to release the Yarren Commission Bion Document a President Kennedy. His “request was turned down. As you ‘probably -_ know, there has been mounting public pressure to release classified. documents of the Warren Commission. While no decision Has been Hs made to declassify it is highly possible we will be asked — to do so in the near “future by National Archives, which has official custody of the documents, or by some higher authority. 2. ielbourne Station is requested to Sigcuss Paragraph One above with S¢L ‘Y afterhis return to : The . service is mentioned in Paragraph 4 of eo S7 and release of the document is certain to provoke questions in Australia: Since C97) is a U. S. Government document we need not (and should not) | request SGUIB) concurrence for release of tthe document. He should be informed, however, that release of € to the public domain is presently under consideration; that: Die Late States Navy has no objections; and that we are giving him advance notice ag a matter of courtesy. Any views volunteered by SQUIB/? regarding this release should be reported promptly to Headquarters. Attachnents: A. Letter, u/s/e Distribution: 2 - COs, OM elbourne) w/fatts u/s/c od 227% I a “Re WAMY 19 August 1963 at . - , CLASSIFICATION HOS ALE NUMBER 3S6- | SECRET Gee v7
104: nga 10037 10520 fo? October, 1968. é Your Melbourne’ Station has sought my views. on the possibility of declassifying a Warren Commission document in which reference Is made to the| | The document in question is CD.971/ dated 22nd May, 196%, together with an attachment dated (29th November, 196 1963: 1 would recommend strongly that (ose: 971 and Its attachment should not on any account be declassified or publicly released for reasons which include ‘the following : (1) It has never been officially stated that there Is a "C.I.A. Canberra Station" or that there are C.I.A. A. officers in| This has been avoided as a point of policy. (ii) Publication of these facts would Invoke a ; ‘spate of questions by the Press‘and Intthe) . which would be contrary to the national security interest, for example : 74 (a) Who approved th the establishment of mY oan - the "C.L.A. (© Sanberra) Station"? \ (b) What Is its composition and location? — an (c) What ts Its. purpose in| (Allegations have already been made that C.I.A. Is Interfering inf]. domestic affairs.) . (d) With what| |Jagencies does it deal? Rich hac nat heen
13-00000 " - wore ee mer eedeae te Pda Suge iiy VMIEWwWs> a en the’ possibility of declassifying a Warren Commission . document _in which reference Is made to the The document in question fs CD.97 dated 22nd May, 1964, together with an attachment dated (29th November, 1963 “T9632 / I would recommend strongly that GD.97P and Its attachment should not on any account be declassified or publicly released for reasons which include the following : (1) It has never been officially stated that there is a "C.I.A. Canberra) Station" or that there are C.I.A, officers In This has been avoided as a point of policy. (it) Publication of these facts would Invoke a . “spate of questions by the Press'and in‘ the } . | which would be contrary to the national security Interest, for example : Ci a gem Om, (a) Who approved the establishment of oon the "C.1.A. (Canberra) Station"? . Ce (b) What ts its composition and location? . <a (c) What is its purpose in| (Allegations have already been made that C.I.A. is interfering in [| __—Jdomestic affairs. ) (d) With what | agencies does it ‘deal? . " | which has not been publicly disclosed, could be brought into discussion.) _(e) With what other foreign agencies does the | deal? (fF) What|_ | control is there over such dealings?
13-00000 (ti) Station. Questions could. be ‘palsed- as to the Investigation. b of the a the validity of Its quoted conclusion anc the result of its further enquiries. I am giving a copy of this letter to your | With kindest regards and best wishes, Richard Helms, Esq., Director, Central Intelligence’ Agency, Washington, 0.C., 20505, . United States of America,
104-10320-10038]  ~ e ; why : : Executive Registry a j . , Fal - HYSHORANDOM FOR: VIA an | Directory of Central Fatellisence Deputy Director for Plana > SUBIRCY .3 Lotter for Director ned —-1__Attached i a eosted letter fron| Sivnature, A Fe @ Calls ta the CRbOrYa LRNaeeyp beiore Siok th feed haisaoeination of Presicent Ss. £ declassirication of €D-2Fp etary ccoacurg with thia recomugndaztion, | _| Gao vroviced ac Oi cLetion, Weisoursey, and a u QL SE ae COnsider the points Mace by letter to bs vatig aNd Soucy 27y Gf the letter to tac Onley BEseetCd reply for your letter to FOU recssrency S#adnst Cec lezsisiontica Gl the var Which rerers ta our Lovesti bea Coumisn iva Cecumeat CH-IF Ty “whESOn woe adauymoug te lepacne> Rnd aiter the , LeaQnaay » ia his viugdy recomagad ayadast the ia the foresecabia future. CY ee aaa on agree Set) - Sake peut Division Attacauents, 5 Letter fra) ae Letter Lapl ie to] Ae 8. C. REA Sys, su yect! Cunsaianios HoIacuweat D. Copy of CRT p E. FAEH) osteo, #ubjgeets Couslosiog Doeusacnt eos; LOO] DDP/FE/PUI/AN - Distribution Orig &1 - Addressee l ~ DDCI 2 —- DDP CD- 5717 Jrisaire (19 ne Ramee PECTLESI I lecnitica of Request gor Eelease of Warren Ovember 1968) ooh LTT - boot, 648 eer Pe it Ben Ab Nw 68 1 ~ C/CI Statr, 1 - CFE/PAI) ott LS FAS SB-|
104-10320-10039 . \ wo | : . me , ne Loaf b 26 NOV 1968 Thank you for your letter of 15 October recommending against the declassification of Yarren Coumission document Cu-J71. I might mention that our inquiry to you in August (1368) was in anticipation of furthor pressure for the release of Warren Coumicsion papers, &@ pressure which kag not materialized. Accordingly, thore is not, at the pressat tins, any dntention to release Co-971. . Should the question be raised at somo future time, the points made by you in your letter provide | every reason to keep the document out of the public codain. | With kindest regards, Sincerely, Js/ Richard Yeluy’ | Richard Uelms Director Distribution: che Recommended: 1 ~<CYE _ Signature c : 1 --Rt L - ppcl ; GL CRI /AN > 2 - DDP Sa eeeL hey bbc wsce tee Deputy Director for Plaus ppP/FE/Pit /an] 7 (x 5502) sad (25 November 19&5) Roe Ae EE <u tl 25~| oe >is Pare. a +7 ae
26 NOV 1968 Thank you “tor your Icttor of 15 October | t Warren Cosmission docuacnt Cp-971. I might sontion that our Anquiry to you in August (1963) . was in anticipation of further pressure for the rolease of Varren Coualigsion pnypers, a pressure which hag not materializec. Accordingly, there is not, at the present tins, any datention to release | reconmonding against the declassif£fication of Co-372. Should the question be raised at. somo futuro | a w tins, the points made by you in your letter provide every reason to keep tae douwscat out of the publis douain. AY; x we | With kindest regards, ce re Xe | . , ‘ i Sincerely, ; aN 1% HN | A Jef Richerd Helos’ . : Doeuinent Number 1042-94 oe | of Richard [elas for FOIA Review on SEP 1976 Director Distributions | ec: DDC 2 = ADDP Orde ~ nee Signature Recommended: i cre 1 = DDCI Woes | potas re §9 i -\PAL/AC) 2 = DDP i) ie ‘wat ate, at fas Lie deuu 8 , nth . see mins Menge Arey . Deputy Director for: plans . oo . 7 Se HO-l FO RR AOR cee ee eee
CURMO . ‘To From : C/CIRA/IS ee Subj : Request for Information under FOIA on OSWALD We have attached : a copy of the print-out on OSWse D from the = . U.S. Defector Machine Program, a sub- ~program of the Soviet. GICs. Machine Program. (The 26 page computer print-out to which Mr.:- Lané makes reference is probably the file content listing. It is -. remarkable that FOIA requests now and then indicate leaks of information.) Under the terms published in the Federal Register, we are not.obligated to provide (a) material from newspapers, books, and other overt sources; nor (b) information provided by other USG agencies; nor. (c) information provided by foreign services, ‘Data ~ from those three sources ‘have been marked in yellow, leaving only” some 16 lines,’ ‘(The sources are SB Division's SPR filed in 201-305052 and HMMA- 31932. . . Lassume that both of these sources involve foreign liaison, aud hence: are exempt, ) In any case, there is nothing in the machine summary which is not covered by the 201. If you want to send the machine dossier along to DDO/FOIO, I have no objection, but nothing _ from this machine dossier should be passed to the requester. Attachment - a/s Original & 1 - CI/RMO | _ oo 1 - C/CIRA/IS ~~ CO . oo | 1 - CIRA/IS Mrs. Bennett . wee 1-- C/CIRA ’ , ; | 1- RAchrono EZ IMPDET AnCT CL BY 061475 qt ke a |