NQ@a: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE BEFORE COMPLETING. TO: Intelligence Community Staff FROM: ATTN: Central, Index “PBI . ° SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees 1, HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available 2. DATE PROVIDED for review but not transmitted, so note.) [Toccunent | —[errerine | @ Lnterview] [resrmow | Jormee | (12/3/75 TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate) The Attorney General with a copy for forwarding to the White House. . IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject) Memorandum reporting the results of an interview by SSC Staff Member of former Inspector Donald BE. Moore, 6. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword) U . IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, other- wise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.) NA . KEY WORDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; used underline for emphasis) if key words not listed are Intelligence collection information handling . SUMMARY (See reverse Side before completing this item) interviered regarding his knowledge of Mod Gpenings and L£ any fttorney General was ever informed of the Mail program. 62+116395 FMK: fmk (4) ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX _ IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75 . ORANATION CONTAINED: Aon OE CLASSIF y BY S Aiy2- - ~ DATE! CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE 379] (6-75) MW 55079 Docld: 32999536 Page —_
INSTRUCTIONS e Type or print clearly in ink. e Indicate classification of the abstract top. and bottom. My “ Port ltye, @ Date the abstract and put-on any.iinternal‘control numbers required. e "FROM entry should clearly identify the organization providing the information. e If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated. SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here, e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional pages may be attached if necessary. ‘ NW 35079 Docld: 329699536 Page 687
®% - vr Ds. Adams 1 “ 1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz ~ . 1 = Mr. W. R. Wannall ” 1 - Mr. W. A. Branigan rod 1 Mr. W. O. Cregar The Attorney Genéral Novenber 3, 1975 o 1 ~ Mr. S. F. Phillips Director, _EBI se U..S,/SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ie ON JNTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) Enclosed ts the original of. a memorandum, with attachment, Feporring the. ‘results of an interview of FBI (8 a co “the memorandum, with attachnent, > . for forwarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel » to the President. Enclosures (4) 62-116395 1 - The Deputy Attorney General Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr. Special Counsel for \ Intelligence Coordination , x 1 - 67= (Personnel File SA Homer W. Schweppe) . NN - SFP iihb thle Assoc. Dir, ____ Dep. AD Adm. _ 534). ba MC8GE snes 15 NOV 26 1975 “AEG. 3 Dep. AD Inv, _ a ae Asst. Dir.: eer OY 5-0 } Z. a TELETYPE UNIT [_] vA 8.4, \ \ R? GPO : 1975 O - 569-920 Page 6&5 40 (3 f .
RACE wus sn TTY ie) LEVY Q! wn SOrisaw10 ' QUNTVINOD sO jo Trainin Lega nt Cos oun Telephone e Rm. _ Director Sec’y —— NW 55079 Docld: 32969536 62-116295 an, & Eval. — poe. lav, ihb ‘oso — yy Th Mr. . Adams Mr. J. A. Mintz Mr. W. R. Wannall Mr. W. A. Branigan Mr. W. 0. Cregar Mr. S. F. Phillips Rovanbes 3, LFS 24 3 € 34 8 all ull aol el ele i. S&. SONATE SELECT GOMATTSES. Ta STOLY COVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES {SSc) Rh: INTERVILY OF FBZ SPECTAL ACHIZ (SA) HOMER W. SCHERPE BY AN SSC STAEP MEMBER the following comeras an interview of FDI SA Uomer W. Schweppe by an SSG Steft Member. On September 16, 1975, SSC Staff Member Paul Wallach advised the Legal Coumsel Division of this Eureas that he desired to interview Schwappe concerning his knowledge of mail openings. Sursuant to this request, the ERI Waived Schveppea’sa confidentiniity agreement for the purpose of the interview on the indleated subject. Sehyeape’g report of the results of the interview 4s contained in a memorandum dated October 15, 1975, a copy of which is attached. Scehtreppe furnished the following sdditional information relative to the intervie. in a brie? off€-the-record exchange between Schweppe end SSC Seal Membex James viek pxricr to the interview, Dick explained that he was interested in Schweppe’s knowledge of the “Hunter Project." Uhen Schweppe indicated he was not familiar with the term, Dick \ consulted his netes to confirm whether Sclmeppe vay, ia 4 je fact, the party he tntersied to interview. Dick's check 4 corroborated that Selumppe's name had been provided him ~ by the Fepariment of Justice ag a individual with Enevledse of “tkmter’ axi raleted projects. 1 ~ 67- (Personnel File SA Homer we co's . Ar SEER Ears, armcRDD yy i640) Whe ORIGINAL AND one OY TO AG - ny ue MAIL ROOMC_] ‘TELETYPE uniIT C_] Cal ENCLOSURE 7.) uy zoc-l oF Page 89 e
SENATE SELECT COMETTER Off INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (ssc) met INTERVIEW OF FBI SPECIAL AGT (SA) BY SSC During this initial exchange, Sctrseppe indicated ‘that his recollection of ‘apecifics such as “Sxactly when?” | and “Did you ever see?” or “then did you First see or learn?” ov. "How many times did you see?” based on Y material possibly seen by him over a period of several months as. far back — .ag 1958 was limited. Dick agreed and suggested that there. ‘geally might be no need to continue the interview, but in the end he suggested that since all-parties were in place, _ the. interrogation magne as } wah. Procend. Enclosure | ‘NOTE: ; Wallach's contact with the Legal. Counsel Division * was with Supervisor P. V. Daly. The information reported _ in the. LHM which augments that in Schweppe's LHM was derived from WFO airtel 10/15/75, "Senstudy 73, " which was the cover _ submitting Schweppe' s LEM. : WW 55079 Doold:32989536 Page 90 ° - 3