“EVE LOV's a de is c a oO- 2 ¥ Dp + 1 LLY oo t x pet fe ert Th. emt red tt. a hf ios a etd . 2 lat » 5 lo 5 ~ rt a © (A fe ns > @ +9 —_ ! Q o nt “ - pty . = ood zs te 2 fal C f, Oo boa nn m4 eee cei iw) > an oa 2 : De ~ a “ . ye oe pet “4 - ~ ~ ; aw wad = S ‘oa fa fa oe zo 1 Lote c4 te = he we S . 2 ord i cad : “8 ’ - lon roa ae co Fal one Y . - a a QO «0 ov 9 3 fy a o ~~ we f " > cr ; - ? ts Ct &L oat ct E; : oC, +4 i @ 9 S| - uty s te Me . bee, ~ 1 ced a -. of ~~ fe + roa aad af w tang -~ o ray 7 i pan al as A ~ ee ne _ Le : oa , _ < ‘ co: = 8 ts 5 a ct 7 Loy = 12 se) +e a vt in O q i “a i wc ay C3 a a A vat * + iad Taal i : ! as o x 7 = al 73 “— . oo 6 rey 4) ct 3 & . Fd lanl 6} pad oS fy . et rm j fe os t4 te C 2 aa a - oe a Oe ca) ~ 3. : : - Py ‘ Pa ns . at . . aad ios P= =} 4 i™ 4 ag Fe a om oa Fae] = o = 2 ad . . = — = = oe a . , on os an a Qa spe io] pron as ~ a al we : . Ss ae . - - tt os tas ct - c o ne u . se 5 ‘ ~ a -_ o {fr - "~ ) . 3 ram * “ae ty rei . “ ™ wt ~- we Z : c ~ 5 : e - - oa coe] ri c G} = va . wi ot mn ee o mn se a ee ~ i Pa -_ ~ Py re 4 oo] on So » 0 2007 a ro = c3 ee ord Gi be . = > < ay 2 tS vo Sees “ i raed 5S + on c =‘ a re ney - ~ ww ae aoe] fe ro ee Later 2 : - i ee : te ° . uF Oe tJ re os iva + My 7 vine . we os -™ ‘- ‘ ay int we faa) ia ana al has =? "et L a = te tnt * > ot ra] ae oor) none on ~ ‘nn a _ we ¢ 2 ae bey ce Qe Sache ea ue " 2 Yr ” " a . —- ” a . 3 m x ”~ . A “ a “* ro ee oa r C 4 is mo Ls cq 3 Lead -y 2 aan 2) ot n * a ” es ~ - . . > = - . : . a ~ a i re , 1 no 9 mc fees fi } Gre an z : 7 ‘ ot by a £ cs ou 19) Ct ~~ 2 Cm ce ~ ~ ~~ c uw ve = . -“ ‘ + ~ fae wd ? Fang tp vet —_~ fe ore Th iy - : c co . wt te _ oo a . ~ : - - a “ e = . . a _ 4 . ve a Te CO a Sad o4 ~ oy 65 a _ ” rm " m7 aoe Q br oo 7£ aa) ~ wey fe he fart or ty cd teed “~ a he i, can 1 Lan iD ot oe oe : ae £ woe * ~ ‘ ae * wat . ” . a feo tn =: Ay) Fas] +? > f mm @ c% - “ ~ ye cas in ons Ne Sr ied nr fad rod ond of, = of - ~ _ an me be : - a M = . s - we : m te wu w4 Lf ae yy > a nw io = en ~ . was - 8 as > . x ‘ ~ cae ‘ewe ct @ oa = ‘a > ot u i- % 3 “ * = * ~ : z ws > ~ - - = . ra . Fad ee . . D 7 tony c oo ot io) es 7] . ¢ 7 one a . - ~ i + . ’ r ~ cal “ ao = rad tee ms x a Lo — oot + a4 ~ fa ~— : . . 5 a oF a te ih = fA it ont pa v6) ri ° < cad ~ 47 : 5 * = &: ” = es - i . pat on ra ~ ~ *, ~~ oS A ral ar > \ va rod wn tv - 4 in ~ Xe * 7 ¥ . - . me . - » ae 7 -F . a te. ~ é 2: Han rot x . ra an v ve mt oan — : , ‘. + + ie te Le en aor a) ve + ue ~ 2: od . . qt : ' ‘ = Pon my : * : Of eon OG 3 é C. ao 2 ~ | Y Koa ™ pay ” oo ve ie — pas . ~~ we * “ at ve ! rr oo Q . on - a ta 7 ra * * ra : tt : : os : r ; bt a - sot st od oe oe ol ae ae 3 . : we . a < “ . a “ -- . “n " a) -- — we ~ Ce ny ce oo ras av F - ~ . ’ . . * ~ . . —_ s “ ” pry cael i . 7 rt ‘and ee For) . an he r oc . 5 , we re =" r * ote m2) Py pal Go: Bt iad ral fad ao aod mi : ~ “ 22 ahs jad cs ud a meee ree “4 ™ c ee i rad t Z an “ ot . ". a ~ . Pd . ‘ “. _ os ~ ~ . ~~ - ie) ta ue wc aa) rh le «r “4 Feat at 2 ae te o m Nn oe > 1 1 ee TON TS memes gametes = Se ceneme ree a — aera Care eae Sas € ‘ - ’ * rd Ld 32404666 Page 25 HW 53216 DotId
SRT ETS ee meme meant Me RG GE EEE ye Seek ane aig ee te etna ce Se ae oe . ; . 1 4 ~ ' | - . Chi Mavina’s mother married Aleksander Ivanovich’ a way did he act loot otPicially and ; : legatayl  Aecarding te the material at sane warina. -. : (7) Shy: after living so loae with her go 1admother did she then raturn to Live with her mothas and step- - ; . : ; ‘ . eis . father? Upon whose aecisicn did sne make the change? a rhe o-. find fuer met hy roe? sPonbu ttre qiavre #t fOe'u fo fhe Veleuavidan sop “hat was how - ee - ii} eneastoued tho family's mave te Leningrad? ; a - — Syeda ba: (Po Do cwar brass formed ta Lantarcad as Cet! Roatve withiav ihe gawe Ormaviaation be anist & had moths fev oth. plamy de; saath, Le ss hanfatiegs was. a hd iLecl Tex Ge ‘\ toboosyeart ay Viet, ade i nes hy tareeitasmsy fin stoards} 7 i wit. Sth vumcived from mec famiig .- 4 e ‘ey Shep : ritaer mignaed tieae woods aeardy diliteratc. ~ HW 53216 DocId:32404866 Page 26
HW 53216 — CEpiig 8 t aurdag sno sohscol Uadar what eircumstances work there? What were her duties” this workyT What oy myisors fej toy hours WORE DS | Canale provide adout this Jobe feu (73) What tepe (official designa the gaeaston fails it receive fae agmening of tine {8S} sho vhore? Tow was POCO eal La Wariaats S a) tlow Cand eye a and the other chitdren veesiver aa That ore) Vhadoadal Mardtunoa cbissbite so much First job alter that made ervaduatlion too ugasy heard of -- retro apnpear for work at DoclId:32404666 Page 27 her a uo ba te 4 eG weoinitttig Atner)y 12 place @ autobio- mother 's eke im ine Pharmacy wet see wie an od pee eas Shier wormed fn a central aid sie go to aoW much) details (names tion) of pension did Yo whom (to did Wat was Marina said she took her meals away from home. yas her AvoOut ber quit after Ft is one thing - aet common, bet not un- to:
HW 53216 eet ) 2 th m \ by ee a AVP! ae ly eitner from schoel 2. strained able to.do this’ er’s brother amd} nothing more on Stas fived with an aunt and unele PY ts SAKOY - er i 7 Cie eet se oe oe Ps ala ete te e nay be ugsigcned: hat it is another after one dav. ‘ . , . ? . . rasht to a d-day trial it iss atmost timpos- NAVE quit ound eone on vacation so eh wey Tmo oteagu Wag ty rT : Sae@ VU naye Wrst ri taal tx Oo! it le samme —- tomsonci and her trad@ union. said that she spent Little time in ; home, takinz her meals outside. ‘be- a redyiions. Yet, there ske stayed, . Laeome ~ Ao pay aud no more pensions, ; Or government. Then, how was she Havinn go to work in Minsix 2 She has .e ~ is wife. Marina has suid these titerviews about othe SERLOV's 2 Whom Shacabove mentionedvin her autobiograpny (sce Parag oh Torr b Tee Amt the Pete Tas meh boned ashegeresesges tay {Re vnest ten tothe en ce a ~% DocId: 32404666 Mion €3 "3 ahornern EHLOV ss: OK, baat above) ier tha stroaded he ashe Pinas owietth both Lhe PRUSAROY 's - PA tien tacky with the lather; other relatives in his tary and Hever the LENLOV's Cin this case 29n shontd be addvessed in just that way -- Lee's connection with the BRELOV's? ‘Page 26
Na Sate whee et, oe Shee Ree te ete 2 OT, s 144 af VOLE GySu 7” » . 4 ghar pha a sueh oats eae bac RAE Hep abtiadtude and cona or testimony regarding nev social Life in Leningrad and Wirsis 2 % ius vague } Shirdavates or BLAnces ne nh wae ? CARED js Others the prior to ealonel marriage sh ounthe li anc from hep oven t past. WOMAN eves th OT Te Lee OT ae ensons tor refusioy tau identify - we Yorimcs boyfriends,: . wno armaceutical warehouse uct than marriage or ty Wis wer ~ and for giving super- answers to some questions regarding he ~ a in these interviews obvi- | which can pronerly be exo as a] to an American, abe. ov OF pein “just a piai it person she represents nerself Sus pi taken ordinary > if) Q “ious. Her s mnt and unele - -~ to Lee and - as Bart girl in of her. love’, and ber Life with Lee must be ascertained. tate- Anothor exawnple of this strange combination of refusal co give names and outright de- from the realities of Soviet Life is to be: roo Aina inatés: story of bee fies to omeetriops with at ot wshe vefuses to name miutaad acrpmia-s ms ise meetinps and tell of returning to die deo with this American ta whan ohe giver ber. phone aan , . TEED ay, tide. “VD office Pi eS VS. Gaver HW 53216 DocId:32404866 Page 29 > BOSeS fe mariiage, the hong number of an no cbiections "WD a . to her ’ rican : ol fjcas : : a na inter: +x eb warts se eee . wie verted we en esate een? > ‘ 5 s C7 a . 4 ~ ay - - s 3
SMS Rn ea eR ca ET The Sec ae ee ene emt te ee a ere Cine a eit STN ti EE te dete BA AS Ele ing RE Dee Lig dhe le tees ee a ee on eae ” ; + . hyo ad ST eyey ? - an Tey ap te . ay of" bye . : m ~ fete Mapingd’s esxobunutiaon of tho reasaa for ntlhies fe AdGéi. Pes ce Oy tec pipes, Vad i seaaty De ac gyeeg nas at j ee rarer deo ricesegd  ezesray US Paes Phe earuamdabances renidiv exXporiescaed some: apo reu ity : ' Wadia: tha name. ee, the Ghoybous vent ciivico would nave Leen ‘'hev'™, or even "Alehsey™, in preference : absut or Vv 2 ro re ~ 4 v bees os rée) ¢o) Wi Go ro ~~ — ete cr ‘ Ce NALS PIA) Other sudjects whieh Marianna obviously must haowomese than she has told include the reason for Lee's amployment in Minsk, vather than Soseow, and the reason for otha differance hetween Lee’s high pay for his oumssilled labor and her tow salary. “ith vcegar ter. @yen @if the only renson vas just as Loe RimselY oresentod ii - ne received a subsidy Brant Cress -- with no other camside eratio ons to be made, certainly Marina would have Bnown of this, and, antess there were something sensitive about the _ Mint, Should mot de raovdhusstant to discusss it. Yeh, er testiinony would indicate she icnows Little or netidir af these things whys (i141) ‘why does it seem she also knows suo iittle of ber husband's mature? "Marina remarked that... he did net... diseonss pohitaes wii } . : § : aoe ™ : ; widh any otherassoudaties . {See pave Ty" yi 35 not hoher or, to her knowled:ze American remavialue that an ordinary mUN-ON-Lhe-stree can - L. es would not discuss politics. to a noticeable exteut. But -HW 53216 DoclId:32404866 Page 30
<2 os - cae Pee tee See te aes TT nr mnmnemene cammare «one com autmonited «'madenbe 6 ate See e ene te sete BR mE ar le eee ee EE ee hh vee ee Pew Sow re b aad mre-Commindst vy dows , defend Pade t ro. study the Russina denwuage and prepara to ct renounce their citizenshin and go to the USgR? How many verurn to the US to vroclain thiigr Marxist views And hand out preo-Castro pamphlets on strect corners! 7 Aad °o assassinate the President of the US? And such men, usually. nost outstanding for their vooiferation, are ahle to keep noticeably sitent on — 4 S even before their wives while sO oo * politicat subjec spending two or three years in their “nolitical homeland’? Marina must be questioned closely about: thease things, just as sho mist be questioned closely o in order to identify these ‘other as Ssociates” with ; whom Loe OSWALD cid not d iSCUSSS polities .-*- , foes oo : (15) Mrs. OSWALD must be asked about her trip to ; RUARTKOY of which we would now nothing were it not” a for the small collection of tetters written to her dauving her stay there. Whe did she make no mention of this trip, yeb talk freeiy of her vacation trips |: to Leningrad, etee What was the purpesa of the trip? What other detniits, (ieag tn, glace oF vesidence, ete.) carota: Gb fer about ite ae AB. in briet. as indivated in the foregoing, it Yis the belief of tin: unders Lit: eed, based on the materiads made ‘HW 53216 Docld:32404866 Page 31
ry ret x oped 42 . \ ' 4 ‘ uf ‘ ee e 4 \ “f te t i 2 “ wed 4 © sy * ‘ ™ ™ *. ' fc : a) iz ved ed 4 oe oe I a - a ; s ' s ral 4 we, rm nO “i un ” of os 5 cd f L i red nw 4 ae 4 H i t a 4 i n : ct c ' yi > Wd ¢ i +3 } 2 ‘ 3 4 eee o Me fae @ - t x as I 4 - i - oe = : Y) : . cs cs is] + 2 32404666 Page 32 re eee me eye HW 53216 DocId
DRAFT? 17 January 1964 ACGACENT A, To Memorandum, submitted 14 Jameary 1964, on the biography and documents of OSWALD, Marina Nikolayewna (nea PRUSAKOVA), 1. The following is presented as an expansion upon comments and questione presented in the original memorandum (see above) and in response” to specific requests from Agency personnel. 2. As noted and commented upon briefly in the original memo(see para 1), there are “suspicious gaps and discrepancies in her (Marina's) story regarding account of her life in the USSR." Not the least of these are connected with her/travels. ‘in the Soviet Union (see 12,af 3.0.(2)=(4), (10) and (15))3 dsvecial | attention should be given Marina's tripsfo Khar'kov and to Moscow to join her husband (the latter not covered in the original meme). . a. HSHUMNNNMM “e would Imow nothing of Marana's trip to Kharkov "were it not for Se hehe Ey ae Then to her during her stay there, Although H¥AMMEMMMEHMMMMMME she has ‘spoken in some detail of other trips -- vacation tripe/ -~- to Leningrad, to Minsk (from Leningrad) she has not even mentioned ‘this tripoie Both the reason for this and the details of the. trip ‘itself must be examined, 105 When, why and how aia she go? With whom did sha ‘travel? How lengthy were her prerarations for the triv (days? weeks?)? Who knew of her travel plans? Did Lee see her off on the trip? How long @id she stay in Khar'kov; when Bia, how and with’ -whom did she return? Who met her upon her return? Who knew of her plans toreturn? It appears that she stayed with the MIKHAYLOV family in Khar 'kov, Did they expeat her? How much time did she spend with then while in Khar 'kov? Whet did the MIKHAYLOVs say about her marriage to an Anerican? (1) Although not of spacial importance of itself alone, a letter HW 53216 DocId:32404866 Page 33
ae . , . DRAFT from Lee ‘(dated 2 October 1961) which she received while in Khar'kov indicates that she was worrying about losing her husband: "I don't MMMM like that you are saying that you feel that you are losing me, You naver will lose me, That's thats* Marina should be asked about her relations with her husband during that period;. was this the influence behing her trip to Khar'kov? Was ’ the decision to make the trip hers alone? Or did she discuss it in advance of the decision? In short, we must investigate the details of this trip as thoroughly possible, | b. No less attention, but from a different angle, should be given her - trip to Moscow, POMNYH 9-14 July 1961, to join her husband, As noted in Lee OSWALD's diary for that period, he had gone to Moscow " (without police permission)" to inquire about the retura of his US passport and to®make arrangements for my wife to enter the U. S. with me.” On 9 July he called . Marina to Join him in Moscow; on 14 July they returned to Minsk together. On 15 July, according to the diary, "Marina at work, is shocked to find out " they everyone knows she entered the U. S, embassy..." Did Marina also go to Moscow without police permission? Did she not Imow that the US enbassy — a 4s undersurveillance? MEME We must ask, what JERSE Soviet citizen does not ~ ‘know that clearance with the police is required for suchtravéa ? ‘What Soviet citizen is not aware of the Soviet government's attitude fonanch and conduct _ toward foreigners in general and Anericans in particular? . The diary continues: "The (blank) hold a meeting end give her a strong. brovbeating. fhe First of many indocfrinations,* And how did this half-wise, half-naive American know at the time that this would ® "the first of many indoctrinations?” what did the OSWALDs do in Moscow when not ‘at the embassy? Whom did they see? . Where did they go? Can Marina account for the whole of the time spent there? HW 53216 Docla:32404866" Page 34
: requested. AUMHYMMIRMM As ouch of the same type of information as is a ( Her ability to account for all of her time and activities hamm-= satisfactorily iemyumehiomm with regard to both trips —- to Khar'kov and to Moscow — is mumuhiameh seriously questioned by the undersigned, 3. Serious questions also attaahk to mer refusal to name certain figures from her past, as commented upon in the original memorandums: she. not only has not named former boyfriends (which refusal, taken alone, might be understood or explained satisfactorily), but has refused to identify one of her work supervisors, What explanation can Marina offer for this? What further explanations can she give for her failure to name one set of relatives in one account of her life and another set in a second account? SidMpyMMMMN dDiographic and other information and - -We must proceed from these questions to ask her to provide/details of her relationships in connection with the many persons identified, BKAXM}Ea iM HMMMMBidme many by first name alone, in the OSWALD correspondence, Full biographic and other identifying information on all of her relatives must be normally possible must be mquested for: DZHUGANYAN, I. Ya,3; Inessag mo Erik? Ernst?) LARIONOVA, L. N.3 | TITOVETS (what is his re&A 1 last name -- TITOV, TITOVETS? ), Erik *; KHONTULEVA,: Galina Petrovna*; GOLOVACHOY, Pavel*; DHOVSEAYA, . Ol'ga Petrovna; Tanaj Pavlik (Ltr-ITEM 137) 3! / the ZIGRRe; author of ltr-. item 138; Rita; - GRL'FAND; ZHICBO; Petrovna (item 140); SMOL, TOMA (both in. ©: a SHISHKOVA, Zhanna (153) . item 140 also) or Tol'ya; SHASHKOVA, Dzhanna*; Andrey ( #143); Olya, Kolya and Yolya ( #148), Dzhummi; Lyuba, Hella (151); SOBGLEBA, E. I. 3 Minulya, — Nadya, ZAYTSRVA, Tolya, Misha, Slavik, Zhenya and BOLTENKO, “anya (all in 155); fnmabant ELIMASHRVSEAYA, Lyudmila (Lyudka); RINGOLD; Tanya and Vera; Eleonorya and Anita; Alekeandr (21GER?); Aunt Anya; the ZIGERe*; Bane Lilya; the ABDRIYANOVs*; the NEDVED'YR¥e®; /TARUSIWA®, All of these persons were either authors of letters to the OSWALDs ‘or were mentioned in. those letters (those whose names are marked with an asterisk must receive special attention), t HW 53216 DoclId:32404866 Page 35 wet?
a) ‘SS DRAFT the sme information Sospmmde must be requested for Inaddttion, mibimammam all persons whose names are mentioned in Bee's diary and address books, & In many instances, the correspondence itself ~- in which these nanes are mentioned - reveals cause for suspicion, as note@ in the original memo (see para 1), and thereby casts still further suspicion on the bearer of those names, As noted, this correspondence includes sone letters "which strongly | suggest that some form of oven code was employed vetween naefan her correspondents in the USSR,® Following are some examples: Be “r ' NW 53216 DoclId:32404666 Page 36