toa i I informed of. Noy | It is possible that there was an earlier cable that | 7 you saw and that we cidn’t, and.that’s my cuestion. a) i ' —_ 2 cf = Soi — . . i 2 Was tnere an eaxviler cable to your knowlecde? \ H | vo - Mr. Rocca. Probabliv not, if this is the only one a i aad - 4 . i = i that you've got on the record. I can't conceive that the il i .€ * i would be any question of fuzzing up the record on cables. 1 ~ 4 H i i ~ "4 You see, it’s a question of cetting the dates. [any n : : | : w 6fd il - : = '* | The 27th to the 2nd -- I'm sorry. ~ i ! 3 Ny s = tio - : 1 . . : = 4 Mr, Goldsmith. That was my first question. i: vw a : : - TO If Oswald contacted the Soviet Embassy telephonically : cf a { @ = “} ON 1 October, why woulc it have taken eight days for the cable Zo: = io i n | reporting that contact to be sent to headquarters? 5 | ~ tsb . : S$ 7 4 (Pause) Ps ij i . i Mr. Rocca. An American male who spoke broken Russian =~ = i n Foi . ; . : - - | well, the answer to the question is not difficult to comprehend. oo ts i ; Zz i3 . . : . : ‘ + : = There is a lead time in the processing of material. There are Ce) ! , i ~ i a lot of leads coming in that have to be selected -- spotted, | \ i ° selected, translated, evaluated, anc then cabled. Put what |; { : aes | disturbs me here is the time. Fed ™ i Mr. Goldsmith. What specifically about the time a4 ew | disturbs you? Mr. Rocca. Well, it seems to me too late, that communication began earlier from Mexico City. But Tocan't | i - _ CON PIDENTIAL ALTERSOM REPCRTING COMPANY, INC Docld:32263409 Page 85
ce) eo il | ™ id i 5 5 | w 3 ~ Hi ~ , 7 <7 ~ | ~ H | Py 3 | c | = id) S i tS : = is wt il x ij = 12 | : i = = ots | . \ = - = Vs iH S : = 14 = . | “oF | a = 18] 7 a | =F | ~ | Cc a . Ss 20 | | 4 i Ce"¢ ss. > ize y a n nm WwW in H tt 4 4 is H : ‘ ! u Docld: 322763409 Page CONFIDENTIAL prove ‘it... con't have thes: o ea ra) ct 0) K bh Fay) f+ if] Me 3 Qu '< 0) ct KH cf: the fact that Aere I am raising a thine ‘that ccoule cause embarrassment. I am obviously in the middle nere. Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. Mr. Recca. And unintention taliy. Qoviously no one wants under the Marcucci thing to create problems. Could I ask you a guestion? De you h che outgoinc cable to the community, the Cate of the outgoing cable? Mr, Goldsmith. The disseminaticn cable. Mr. Rocca. The Cissemination cable. . Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. I have that For”you to review. Mr. Rocca. You see, Jack “Whitten handlec this. He handled it by the book, as I see it. I think he did an excellent job in doing it, -so that this that would clarify it. Mr. Goldsmith. You asked for the dissemination cable. I am coing to show it to you now. Tt is CIA Gocument number 2145. Here it is. Mr. Rocca. Well, this must be the first one, then. What I see in here rea ally reflects what is in this. plus -- Mr. Goldsmith... Would you be more specific for the DENTIAT MN REPORTING COMPANY, INC. CONPFPTE 66 &5: in this thing I did, I had every one of these things laié¢ | out from beginning to end. And at the same time I an conscious
CONFIDENTIAL. © 86 | i . 1 3 . : i | record as to why you think that the cable, that is, CIA number 2 4. _ . , . 177, must have been the first one reportinc an Oswald | ~ 4. contact? o | | 7 4 Mr. Rocca. Because it uses identical language here, |; ow | = So . : 2 ~ |. "American male.* = } a 4 | now es . - . “i . | Me. Goldsmith. But that doesn't mean that a cable | S - & 7 | coulgn't have been sent up eariier reporting the contact . i | | S ~~“ o£ Oswald with the embassy on 1 Cctober. | ~ ' a 5 || - . < i Mr. Rocca. Well, responding to that, 7 can't say 5 i that it doesn’t -- of course it doesn't. But I've net seen = 4; | = ‘i } at. That's the moint. i _ 7 | My impression was that tnere was a shorter gap here @ 22) , | ! & ~ ) between the two. Here is the ninth. I think this was on the | =, fo = Tat . . . . wo. an i eighth, sent on the eighth (indicating). | oS iu 7 { = : | be 134 . = tae vs : : ' Se i Mr. Goldsmith. This was sent con the eighth, that's = i = ye . i = is | . | _ | correct. . 4 47 | . ; . . - Mr. Rocca. That‘s correct. So, that's narrowing it. | = This went out on the tenth. This is Whitten, immediately { = 1s |i j = 7 if hind H ~ 7 aCccing. ' ¢ 39 | S 20 | Ps nig ig the first cable, ve | i fe) Fa this is the Farst cable, 2 es. ; ay | Keer The reason that it has taken so longa is essentially 0 oN“ } the reason that is associatec with the mechanics ana tne aq | | handling of mechanics. 24 jj ; Mr. Goldsmith. For example, woulc it have taken | some time to translate the tape from Russian into English? . 4 ; } | CoN FIDENTIAL Docld: 32263409 Page 87
| Mr. Rocca. Well, it would nave to have been screened. 2 | — . . . It wouic have then te have been reviewed and spotted. [It 2 | as 3 ; . : . - ; | @ | . would have nad to. have been prepared as a sugcestion for the | | : : . es a ; . ' chief of station, who reviewed all of these, as I understand | a i 1t, to send up. ' is ! “ > | So, that would take about three or four days, five A t ™ 2 Gays maybe, depending on the amount of traffic that is involve: | = ~ 4 So, this.is ccrrect. It's this cate (indicatinc) . ant | : i u yy ‘ + ose : i : i that is really imvortant, not that one (indicatinc.) fad i : - 19 | Sa That's when they really started to work on it = i Gown there. © 7 = } . - 12 | a + . - . = ‘ i - “ow Mr. Goldsmith. By this cate, for the record, which = i = -i Gate are you referring to? \— ! : a i Mr. Rocca. The seventh of October. | S i Mr. Goldsmith. And that is written in in script on | = i = Is | a ; ; A - . 4 7 ‘ _ | the bottom of CIA number 177, is that correct? - q Mr, Rocca. That's right, yes. | = | Sc, that gives the noint of reference to the Mexican in é 4 thine. j . } i} } { = a i ! = 29 | Sens ¢ : a9 Mr. Goldsmith. Getting away from CIA number 177 for Zoe | a moment, please read CIA number 2097 throuch paragraph one, tive ARS ANS n> ey | 1 q | ending on -~ paragrach two, ending on CIA number 2009. 224 i . (Pause) i (Discussion off the recerd.) ae | aw ty i 4 q i Mr. Goldsmith. Have vou had a chance to review that? ; , CON PIODENTIAL ALDESRSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. Doclda: 32263409 Page 66 : me t
. CONFIDENTIAL, i i ; Mr. Rocca. I've forgotten where I was supposed to veces eee ee OQ j | i i : | 2 I ; Stop. | t 3 . 1 @ i Mr. Goldsmith. Paragraph two on page 2909. Read | through there, please. wa . | 5 S| n (Pause) = A w : i w a} ° Mr. Rocca. Yes.. ~ - if = 743 oe ~ Mr. Goldsmith. ‘Would you icentify what CIA number = | 2007 is? | , ~ Ud Mr. Rocca. This was one of the -- this was, I guess, = ; the grand-daddy. viece that we sent over at the very outset tc . . = | cf the relationship. which summarized the information. es | Mr. Goldsmith: What's the date on that? @ =: ~ i Mr, Rocca. It's the 31st, Januarv. % i Mr. Goldsmith. 1364, = 1s! = ta ! . . . . . 2 a Mr, Rocca. I think it was prenared by me in CI/R&A ~ i} presumably. I've forgotten who actually worked on it. It may: ~ yo : i a IT | = have been Mr. Hall, and I certainly reviewed it. It 5 | summarized the initial infcrmation in some of the cables, = f or in the cables. coc |. : . s 20 | rf Mr. Goldsmith. Does this document make svecific a1 4 ExcoSeite | reference to any telephonic intercept of an Oswald ~ | conversation? 23 | A) . i For examole, on page CIA number 2008, it reports tne Oswald contact, but does not give the nature of tne contact, DoclId: 32263409 Goes it? CON FIDENTIATL ISOM RESCRTNG COMPANY, INC. By LOC Page 39 ;
oO <9) CONFIDENTIAL Mr. Rocca. No. tI thins that this, again, was something that Mr. Helms' q 2 | . | 3 | coverea in his cover note. "The compromise’ of the matérial - “| ‘in its present form would lead directiyv to the destruction Of | ! . if w _! | = - | current. sources and methods of this agency in Mexico ané i i . 5 | : . Ls hoet ene ve) S| elsewhere,” and that it was considered to be therefore “witnain ~ i ~ Ht S ‘| othe legitimate interest in eretecting those sources } : Sg) , | S ~ not to state what the. reliable and vroven source was." ~ < "4 Mr. Golesmith. Well, earlier we referred to a memo = Qt eh < had been written by Slawson in which he apparently was = rod a 44 : 3 4 . * 5 ' = ‘'' 4} confused and thoucht that Oswald had heen observed at the -- | 3 i : - i2 ! qh ; 4 7 AG BS n + ] . t en Mr. Rocca. He wrote that in March or April. This = 4 | . : ~ 4 + | @ eq 33 was in January. Between Januarv and April thev hac been over : z Td ‘| 2 : = 7 s , ' eo i anc hac actually seen the interceots. ~~ \ n cs in z ig | Mr. Goldsmith. No. The trip to Mexico Citv was in | . '* | the middle of April. | : uv Mr. Rocca. Yes, but they had been over to the Agency. - = : H os i ! aay 15 ; = e | Mr. Goldsmith. Oh, they had been to the Acencyv anc wn i | = 13) , 4 = i} hac seen the intercepts. c | ! oa 20 | Mx. Rocca. Yes, ves. 4 ra | IF oe i_ 4 fn. 5 = 27 : pa | My. Goldsmith. So, sometime arter January 31 -- Oe: ay ean @ eNO Mr. Rocca. They were actually shown. te ; i Mr. Goldsmith. -- thev were toidc. i Mr. Recca. I think they were tola at the very time “i thst this was written, what we were talking about. Peliiable | : -  CONFIDENTIAG | | Docld:32263409 Page 90 ALSERSON RE:
: CONFIDENTIAL 29 , 1 | and proven sources ~-- this was telephonic. u Mr. Goldsmith. So, is your testimony then that to a telephonic intercept, oraliyv th: da ' Gespite the fact that the document itself makes no reference tn | information was . i Mr. Rocea. I think that the mistak mere was that | ws = ° i communicated. = t ww : * s : ‘ sia a S| Mr. Rocca. That this was communicated without possibility ~ 7 | -o£f misunderstanding. | ~ 30: 7 ‘ ) = 1% : 3 i < o Mr. Goldsmith. And who mace that communication? ~ 4 | 3S iH 1A ’ : S . sir. Rocca. I have no idea. i 2 tg} : a ae os so ; = “| Mr. Goldsmith. Dic vou do it nersonally? i G an Mr. Rocca. I'm sure that I referrec to it in my own « : i = 2 ; c lks with Ss] } waat} i on Pd Tr ian Lar i i i talks wit lawson, but wnether it was on Januarv or later, tr ui : = i i = 3! er ae - 3 : @ S 13 4 I con’t know. But it's rnerfectiv clear from the start that | i HO , = ota ok 1 - . # this material had to be from a very sensitive direct scurce. | = tt Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to point out also an error ~ Ie | here. It indicates that in 9 October -- . | - Mr. Rocca. I take your point. I take your point. a H i mi — m3 4 . ws . _ . . ; eT Mr. Goldsmitn. Fine. For the recorc = will nave to | e | finish making the point, which is that according to this, the c H . i S 2] . . 38 7” | Gocument indicates that Oswald's contact was on October 9, i . \ H ase | his contact with the Soviet Embassy. In fact, we know that it fat; et . . , : td) “" | was October first, and severai other times around that as well, u ' { but not as late as October 9%. 24 | Is that correct? as ' . H | 1 “ON PIDENTIAL. qQ Q a t ALDESRSOM SZPORTINE COMPANY, INC. Docld:32263409 Page 91
(202) $S§6-29"5 20024 ay ee Dd. TOU, ~ a REPORTERS BUTEDING, WASHTHC S.U. - = Bs oe = Sal o ~ = Sa o c cong o DoclId: 32263409 — ta de a Na sy -- -- On on ~ - “wa CONFIDENTIAL ike] 4 on 9th of October, CIA headquarters was info mead, was whet was intenced, rather than Mexico City, and it just didn't “-come out. ony My. Goldsmith. Fine. I wanted to clear that uo for the record. Mr. Bocca. I notec that when I read it. These are the ter Kh ible gaps that come out. M you had occasionio review, paradrapnh one, I believe, reports a contact between Oswald and the Soviet Embassy. I take it fe¥] thet by referring to the crypt LIENVOY, the person receiving the cabie would know that this was a telephonic interceot. Mr. Rocca. Exactly. Mr. Goldsmith. In the second paragraph it indicates "Have a photo." i will read it. “Have photos. Male appears be American entering Soviet Embassv twelve- sixteen hours, leaving twelve-twenty- two on i October. Apparently age 35, athletic builé, circa six feet. Receding hairline. Balding ton. “ere khakhis and sports shirt. Source, LIEMPTY. " Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. c ON FPIDENTIATL =: mee maa; - ALDERSGOM REPORTING COMPANY, Ie. 92 ir. Goldsmith. Getting back to CIA number 177, which
92 ; CONFIDENTIAL | i Gescription of Lee Harvey Oswald? i Mr. Rocca. It doesn't, I would sav. 2 | - a tas ) - Mr. Goldsmith. Please clarify. i / Tt. doesn’t contain an incorrect description of Oswald?! ire) q , , \ = - 4 H > - i Ata N Ts . ~ = . . : ~ Mx. Rocca. .No., it contains a correct description of | . fe] =) 1 * | a totally different verson. « - it ; oe &. 74 at ten os | LS i Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. | = i é i Then my question is whv did the descristion of a 3G 7 i - 34 cc. + + 1 . 7 7 . _ 4 totally cifferent person get linked to the informaticn contained 5 » din the first paragraph on Oswald? a i Mr. Rocca. I think that this, of course, lies in the. : | whole area of zeal, investigative zeal that involves simolyv fag Hy . os i = F | =. 4 taking assets that you have and attemoting to make matches. ~ ie | . . : 2 a5 : . a : The question is one that I woulé acdress to, if he were alive, = 15 | . . a . = 1 I woule address to Win Scott, because it was his, this was ~ | his particular bias at the time, and not only did’ he state it : 2 4 here, but he repeated it in.one of the later telecrams, a ! 5 ig - 5 jf even after he had been told the correct description. = an! +44 ‘ so : = i Mr. Goldsmith. Scott repeated it in a later telegram. - i ; i = oan! | i Mr. Rocca. ina later telegram. | Doe Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall’ when that was? | Was it pre-assassination? Mr. Rocca. He didn't repeat the cescripticn. He Z4 i repeatec the reference to it, and then he sent the photo. Mr. Goldsmith. Okay. m ae) a hy 4 Le) fe) N TIAT, tr as | ‘ | ALOERSOM SEPORTING COMPANY, INC. Docld:32263409 Page 93 ALDERSON REPORTING COMP r
A va 4 s ‘ wn = $ > po} ™N ' » we 3 ~ ~ ‘ c - « / a & 3 amd ~ e ™ . « ag Y c - ’ = 10 = = S = 11 a ba a 14 iw JM, REPORTERS BUTLDTNG ’ ow S x -—- 300 7H STREET, re) 47 “ . =: TS wet ak e. a) nw ew i) ia CONFIDENTIAL 93. Mr, Rocca. Sc, that -- correct that. I mean, he cid ry) net repeat in a telecram, But. he w of the month, thouch the Navy never did resvond with a nhotograndh. | t Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Do vou know how the incorrect cCescrisction, or the description of one nerson was tied in to Oswald? Mr. Rocca. You see, this was simply the analyst's -- this was simply Win Scott, the FBI senior official, running the case, anc he was making a match, ane it was wronc. My, Goldsmith. Well, Mr. Scctt wasn't the person who selected the photogracn. Someone else presumably selected the vhotograoh. Mr. Rocca. “ell, someone showed. it to him. And he 7 1 . . felt that there was enought cf a ~-- I jucge, this is totallv a hypothetical: I never discussed it with Him, as far as I can ry (D Q Q) k ad tH ‘3 10) K Qu fa Ou e ever write it up in a memorandum or record -- but this was a mixing up of two tetaliv unrelated things. Mir. Goldsmith. You see, the first paracrapnA makes reference to a telephonic contact on 1] October -~-— Mr. Rocca. A telephonic contact? > ‘Mr. Goldsmith. Between Oswald and the Soviet =mbassy.' Mr. Rocca. “Which had taken a number of days to process. Docld: 32263409 Pave o4 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC. S given -~ my recollection { “was that he was given.a correct descrintion in about the middle
sO & CONFIDENTIAL | . Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. That telephonic contact makes m ne reference to Oswald going to the Scviet. it mbas nn t - a Ve =O, in { t i licht of the absence of any reference by Oswald that he was 4 : . : ‘ a os = ; “1 ooine to be at the Embassy that dav, why would Scott or anvonre' af ¥ x a | | = 5; Lt a : : . . - | 2 7" 4} else at the Mexico City station have selected a shotocravch i 1 Hl t ” 7 of someone who was at the Embassy en 1 Octoser? Ss 4 4 Mr. Rocca. “ell, you con't raise the cuestion as x 2. i . . . = ~“ i to why they were selecting 1 Cctober for scanninc? i at 3 4 - +3 - - i <7 4 Mr. Golésmith. Well, I presume that they -- = 0 | Mr. Rocca. They're using 1 October as a baseline, and 2 i] a . ; - 4: , i = '' } anything that came through that looked like an American was : - - a viable iead, he thought cr would have thoucht. And this = ‘* | was the only one, and he jammed it. a in oan Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know for a fact that this was | fad HI = ts : = “4% the only one? = ! = 3) : thos . | Mr. Rocca. As far as I know it is. The rest of the |; ~ i “ 17 " ; . ‘ . . # coverage shows no one else that was even an American. They & i , : = i were all Latins. roa) H i = 1g! i, = Mr. Goldsmith. Have you reviewed the coverage? ¢ 4 ; 4 ” 20 | Mr. Rocca. Only what came out Curing the course of { - o <b . Ne! = coe ake fe ‘iH New te } A 4 ‘ { Pon N the Rockefeller thing. There were a series of photographs au ‘f Sar nee ‘| is no ro take in front of -- what -- the Cuban Fmbassy, was it, i “71 or the Cuban and Soviet Embassies. And none of them appeared | ' to be Americans. I think that was what he. was using as his baseline. There were others that were Latins. Docld: 322763409 Page 945
, CONFIDENTIAL ~* 14 . 4 . : il But you can look at all the photos yourself, 2 | I think you have to put yourself in his position, 3 | we | . -~ | trying to find any kind of -- ! =~ . a . a ~ i | Mr. Goldsmith. Excuse me, Mr. Rocca. 2 Tb (Pause) | v8 Mr. Rocca. You have to put vourseif in his vosition ; c 7 } . : : es 7 anc consider the problem of tryinc to find any lead, and € .* y that's what he did. i I think, of course, it is unmercifullyv -- i - 1 ~ 10 4 +s ; E. Mr. Goldsmith. Pardon me? i : | = 1 L . . = Mr. Rocca. It has unmercifully complicated the case ! wt { { 2 | =~ 42 +4. 5 3 3 | - 4 because. it introduced a whole new lead -- bed 3 Mr. Goldsmith. The rossibility of someone -- ~ t . ~ i tn Mr. Rocca. -- as far as. I'm concerned... This is mv = “~s reading of it. ; a i = is 4 “ . - ‘ . . : . ql Mr. GOL z Coke £ Mp Le, ne 106 i Y ‘ Z i Mr. Golcsmith or example, one lead that it introduces = ye dl “8 Foe, bya - . : - | is the ‘possibility of someone eise impersonating Oswald. Ly : } = 4 Mr. Recca. Oh, I mean -- it's totally onen-endec, = ; totally open-ended. It coulc be cuite the reverse. It i ! . . } a 20 | | | , : , + coulé be just some ordinary person who was there on personal pea } business. It's impossible to ciscuss it rationally, it seems : bee an ; ™~ | to me. | Mr. Goldsmith. Did the Acency ever learn the identity: | of the person who was described in paragraph two? ; Mr. Rocca. Not as far as I know. Not up to the time > " CoM PF IDENTIAL : r _ LOCERSON ZEPORTING COMPANY, foc. Docld:32263409 Page 96 Mee ASS =
CONFIDENTIAL 1 ; ‘I left. | 2 | , 7 : "| Mr. Goldsmitn. When was the Warren Commission first | | 23 | @ “4 told about this picture? on i Mr. Recca. I think they were told in the whole : x “| span of time between January and March, when they were t a . 2 H ° j Working on it. ._ They actually came over and viewed then. ce -= oe : : an : ‘ : ; = I think the first time they had, they got the -- | S a: may. . thos = 7 Mr. Goldsmith. Isn't it true that the Warren Commission-- ~ Mr. Rocca -- they got a cropped photocraph: That = is Gr ar | - A 3 : = tM : . . a . . ' = i was the thing that had started it. It started down in = ‘i Dallas and worked its way up. | oo | Mr. Goldsmith. Isn't it true that the Warren Commission . = | Gicé net know about this photegraph until Marguerite Oswal¢d ws : testified before the Commission in February ané made reference a 4 a ‘| in a ! S tc a photograph that she had been shown which she alleced = | Cepicted Jack Ruby, and that orior to that time, the Warren Zs | Commission had not been told about this photograph? - | Mr. Recca. Well, they were told about it when this = y thing went over to them -~ did it not? Was it omitted at } that time? aS I cannot answer that.. I can't say one way or the Sty al aS ioe y re) ther whether they did or not. Mr. Goldsmith. Was there a Cesire on the nart of 42 | ‘ . : anyone at the CIA to wait out the Commission on the question : ze of this photograph -- in-other words, not tell the Commission CONFIDENTIAL i 4 MERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. Docld:32263409 Page 97 ak
1 t 4 = - < @ 4 > w = © = 8 > = N ' u? 2 un Ss raat ~ : wae F — ~ s Ze 3 = ™ . a £5 7 So ° . = 16 = S a cS S = ee = tj a ‘ “ wu = tA i BUTLDING , ra + 4 me = 4s - = bg S = = ts = wt 17 So ied 4 = 3 ad wn _ 14 LL 17 ~ Cc “ Ss 720 oo octet as 4° ras DoclId: 32263409 F CONFIDENTIAL 97 about the surveillance overation: and not tell them about this chotograrh? speci a Mr. Rocca: As far as I know, there was no such ~~ * 4% TTIW AK an t cnet 12 3 Mr. Goldsmitna. Shen was the Warren Commission ficaily told about the connecticn tween’ this picture and the Oswald contact? told some age 96 if i | conscious desire. | | “1 Oct form. By that I mean when was the “arren Commission specifical about Oswald having contacted the Soviet Embassy on eber ané this rhotograph mistakenly being linked to him? Mr. Rocca. They must have gotten it in its original he cables. Os cr when they rea smit they given the cables? ion Mr. Gol tps 3 Du z +r 1) fe) m0) Ky o 4, Mr, Rocca. Those cables must have time after that January memo. been civen to trem: { Mr, Goldsmith. “ould there be a record at the Acency | Mr. Rocca. I don't know. I woulc hope so, sut I | ! | as to when they would have been shown these specific cables? couldn't be sure. Mr. Golésmith. Were you the person that showec them the cables? Mr. Rocca. Nc. tet <a 0) oO oO 0 bd G ct I can't say that I was, thouch I ma I have an imoression that they were so important that thev would have been handleé by someone higher up. CONFIDENTIAL na PORTING COMPANY, INC. iO) ALCERSON RF
a a i 3 @ it a a . - { I d “ i = ¢- a - i ™N if ; 4 a, | WI wo 1 | a He a 7 ji a / - ti = | ™N $ t 3 7} . ( x ; c i: = (0) cS : 300 7TH STREET, SJ. REPORTERS BUTEDING , HASTE ory aw LN a eT nn whe aa ™~ 4° “~ 24 ae Docld: 322763409 Pa ge in a @ifferent. 2) But this is simpiv a time. cther words, it is smi smi 1Q (@) ct ct @ mS h nation it was ct “(@ assass Do you recall that? Tie My. Rocca. The of the FBI office in Dallas as a feeling the afternoon that the as ct ao chotograoh, thouch i oe Whitten as not being O rel - - ty there is no reason to believe 1a mhotoaraphic coverage. He had th -- the Naval Attacne think the Bureau this was cone Bureau representative in Mexico fice transmission to the Bureau of Mrs. QOswalc. pL lazer on the picture wa Bu Zashi Da 99 93 ct Le 189) ci t +e] Ou po Ith er Wy ry City. gotten into the hands consecuence of Mr. Scott's sassSination tock place 1 been impeached alre swald,; i persisted i ationshir. t. I< simplv cam 0) S ry e Bir Attache or tH the Bureau and shown reau. office here. udge, Le rH rt, ard so