"Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 19927 (44 USC 2107 Hote}. DATE: 11-14-2017 ; ; ‘NY, Z105- 146601 "f SECRET NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, APRIL 26, 1962 (PROCEDURE); PAGE THIRTEEN NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, JUNE 15, 1962 (PROCEDURE) $ — DETROIT LETTER TO BUREAU, JULY 24, 1962 CANALYSIS) 3 BOSTON LETTER TO BUREAU, SEPTEMBER 5, 1962 (ANALYSIS)3 BUREAU LETTER TO LAS VEGAS, SEPTEMBER 26, 1962 (PROCEDURE); DETROIT TELETYPE TO BUREAU, SEPTEMBER 27, 1962 (TERMINATION) $ LAS VEGAS LETTER TO BUREAU, NOVEMBER 5, 1962 (PROCEDURE)$ BUREAU LETTER TO LAS VEGAS, NOVEMBER 23, 1962 (TERMINATION); NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW NEW YORK LETTER YORK YORK YORK YORK YORK LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER TO TO TO TO TO TO BUREAU, BUREAU, BUREAU, BUREAU, BUREAU y BUREAU, JANUARY 14, 1963 (RE-INSTITUTED)$ MARCH 7, 1963 (ANALYSIS) 3 MAY 7, 1963 (PROCEDURE) $ MAY 22, 1963 (PROCEDURE); AUGUST 19, 1963 (PROCEDURE); NOVEMBER 27, 1963 (TERMINATION); NEW YORK MEMO OF SA FRANCIS’ ZANGLE, NOVEMBER 19, 1963 (PROCEDURE) 3 NEW YORK MEMO OF SA BRIAN P. MURPHY, JANUARY 8, 1964 (PROCEDURE) 3; , NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, JANUARY 29, 1964 CPROCEDURE); DocId: 32300641 Page 14
riReleased under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1997 (44 USC Fil? Hotes. DATE: 11-14-2017 , e : ‘. . 4 PAGE FOURTEEN ig SECRET NY 10514660} BUREAU LETTER TO NEW YORK, JANUARY 23, 1964 CANALYSIS)$ - . NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, FEBRUARY 20, 1964 CANALYSIS)3 NEW YORK MEMO OF SA BRIAN P. MURPHY, MAY 4, 1964 (PROCEDURE) WASHINGTON FIELD LETTER TO BUREAU, MAY 19, 1964 (PROCEDURE) $ NEW YORK MEMO OF SA F. W. ZANGLE, AUGUST 18, 1964 (ANALYSIS); NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, OCTOBER 19, 1964 (PROCEDURE); _ NEW YORK MEMO OF SA B. P. MURPHY, NOVEMBER 13, 1964 (PROCEDURE) $ NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, DECEMBER 29, 1964 (RE*INSTITUTED)$ : NEW YORK MEMO OF SA J. S. MC COOL, JANUARY 7, 1965 CPROCEDURED $ NEW YORK MEMO OF SA Rs Js TAGLIARENI, FEBRUARY 4, 1965. (PROCEDURE) $ i NEW YORK MEMO OF SA W. de GROVES, FEBRUARY 8, 1965 (PROCEDURE) 3 | NEWYORK MEMO OF SA B. P. MURPHY, FEBRUARY 12, 1965 | (PROCEDURE) 3. | . | NEW YORK MEMO OF SA J. S. MC COOL, MARCH 13, 1965 (PROCEDURE); NEW YORK MEMO OF SA BRIAN P. MURPHY, JUNE 10, 1965 (PROCEDURE); < . BUREAU LETTER TO NEW YORK, MAY 19, 1965 (PROCEDURE); LEGAT, BONN LETTER TO BUREAU, JUNE 23, 1965 (PROCEDURE); : “Ga ene or ra er) win rh A Me AS DoclId: 32300641 Page 15
Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1997 (44 Ut F107 Hotey. DATE: 11-14-2017 | , ep LQ ©) Coos | | NY 105-146601 ‘ t SECRET | PAGE FIFTEEN ar) NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, JULY 1, 1965 CPROCEDURE)$ .- “NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, OCTOBER 6, 1965 CAUTHORIZATION) $ NEW YORK MEMO OF SA JAMES D. GIBSON, DECEMBER 15, 1965 (PROCEDURE) 3 : : } ! . . NEW YORK MEMO OF SA JOHN E. MULVIHILL, DECEMBER 29, 1965 CANALYSTIS) 3 - ‘ NEW YORK. LETTER TO BUREAU, JANUARY 10, 1966 (PROCEDURE) ; NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, APRIL 4, 1966 (ANALYSIS) $ BUREAU LETTER TO NEW YORK, APRIL 21, 1966 CAUTHORIZATION)$ NEW YORK LETTER TO BUREAU, MAY 3, 1966 (PROCEDURE) 3 NEW YORK MEMO OF SA J. E. MULVIHILL, JUNE 30, 1966 (PROCEDURE); NEW YORK MEMO OF SUPERVISOR GEORGE M. QUINN, JULY 25, 1966 (PROCEDURE) $ ~ NEW YORK MEMO OF SUPERVISOR GEORGE M. QUINN, JULY 26, 1966 (TERMINATION) 3 ; _! NEW YORK MEMO OF SA FRANCIS We ZANGLE, MARCH 6, 1969. (ANALYSIS). DoclId: 32300641 Page 16
Released under the John F. Hot Kennedy Assassination R ; nae. dita 2017 ecords Collection Act of 1992 (44 Use 7i0t ey. 6 ; | O ce co NY 105-146601. er SECRET PAGE SIXTEEN De.  Z COVERA | | filis PROGRAM WAS HANDLED ON-A TOP LEVEL BASIS BETWEEN FORMER ASAC JOSEPH L. SCHMIT AND POSTAL AUTHORITIES, NYC. NO CONTROL FILE was MAINTAINED FOR THIS.PROGRAM AND ITS ACTIVITIES WERE NOT RECORDED. DOCUMENTATION WAS AN ANONYMOUS SOURCE. THE PROGRAM IS BELIEVED TO HAVE COMMENCED IN 1959 OR 1960 AND TERMINATED ON JULY 22, 1966 BY NEW YORK MEMO OF SA GEORGE M. QUINN, DATED JULY 26, 1966, CAPTIONED “SAM SURVEY 3 Gus} surveys: Z COVERAGE” Cot (NEW <YORK FILE 65-18045), THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM WAS | TO EXAMINE SUSPECTED MAIL DESTINED (FOR THE SOVIET MISSION TO Dy THE UNITED NATIONS SHUN) , NYC. ANY SUSPECTED LETTERS WERE | CARRIED TO THE NEW YORK OFFICE FOR EXAMINATION AND THEN RETURNED TO THE LENOX HILL POST OFFICE FOR DELI VERY. DoclId: 32300641 Page 17
’Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1997 (44 Usc 7107 Ho te ay DATE:, 11-14-2017 NY. 105-146601 ia SECRET PAGE SEVEN TEEN THE UNITED NATIONS . ) IT. COMMENCED ON AUGUST 1, 1962 AND “TERMINATED MAY, 1965. AT FIRST THIS COVERAGE INVOLVED THE ” GRAND CENTRAL STATION, USPO, NYC, WHEN THE{SUBAN MISSION wast MI Z COVERAGE WAS ALSO INSTITUTED AGAINST THe CUBAN: MISSION TOL Ay LOCATED ‘AT 155 EAST 44TH STREET, NYC, | APPROXIMATELY JANUARY, 1963, mat THE [CUBAN MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS MOVED TO 6 EAST 67TH Cf iQ) STREET, NYC, AND THE POSTAL FACILITY THEN INVOLVED WAS THE LENOX HILL POST.OFFICE, NYC. THE. VOLUME OF MAIL WAS SMALL WITH MAINLY FIRST CLASS MAIL BEING SCREENED. THE PURPOSE OF THIS COVERAGE WAS TO, IDENTIFY CUBAN ps NTELLIGENCE agents (¥. | i IN THE UNITED STATES AND (CUBAN ji NTELLIGENCE OFFICERS HAVING DEFEC~) Sennen TION POTENTIAL. THIS COVERAGE was INITIATED BY NEW YORK MEMO OF SA JAMES W. STEVENSON, DATED AUGUST hk, bo62. AS IN THE | 2 COVERAGE OF Th smut, 80 DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE TO DESCRIBE. THis acTIVITY. | EF. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS IN ALL OF THE ABOVE PROGRAMS, SUSPECTED MATL WAS CARRIED TO THE NEW YORK OFFICE BY sas OF THE NEW YORK OFFICE. IT WAS THEN ove ; DoclId: 32300641 Page 138 ny a
DATE: 11-14-2017 , | ° z | O | O NY 015-14660! i SECRET PAGE EIGHTEEN o "CHAMFERED" BY OTHER SAS OF THE NEW YORK OFFICE. THE IDENTITIES OF THESE AGENTS WHO “CHAMFERED” ARE NOT RECORDED IN ANY FILES RELATING TO sam, (Suv, Jous:-® 7 SURVEYS. AFTER THE “cHamreren" CS \ MATL WAS PHOTOGRAPHED, IT WAS RETURNED TO THE. PROPER POSTAL FACILITY, AS A RESULT OF THE ABOVE ACTIVITY, INDIVIDUAL CASE FILES WERE OPENED ON THOSE SUSPECTED OR DIRECTED TO INDIVIDUAL SUBJECT CASE FILES WHERE THEY ALREADY EXISTED. THIS DISSEMINA- TION WAS USUALLY BY MEMORANDUM PREPARED BY NEW YORK OFFICE AGENTS ADMINISTRATING THESE PROGRAMS. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT IF THE NAMES OF ANY SAS ARE FURNISHED TO THE SENATE COMMITTEE, THE BUREAU GIVE CONSIDERATION TO NOTIFYING | THESE AGENTS IN THE EVENT THEY MAY BE CALLED TO TESTIFY BEFORE |THE ‘SENATE COMMITTEE. | IT 1S NOTED THAT MANY BUREAU DOCUMENTS ARE LISTED HEREIN. | aT THE TIME THESE DOCUMENTS ORIGINATED, BUREAU CORRESPONDENCE | WAS NOT CLASSIFIED AS IT IS NOW. ALL THE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO CONCERNS A HIGHLY SOPHISTICATED TECHNIQUE AND WOULD BE DoclId: 32300641 Page 19