Oo tee at . _@. . Maintain LIFEAT capabilities for mounting operations against targets of opportunity, . ¢, Maintain supervision over basehouses, equipment, and training of - personne] assigned to the LIFEAT operations, Coordination a, Information produced by LIFEAT, primarily a Station operational support asset, ia closely coordinated with other operations of the Mexico City Station, No operational coordination ia required with any other seographical area, but they are advised of any information produced by LIFEAT which may be of interest to then, b, Project LINOG which supports the principal "outside" Case Officer, David M, WIISTED, is effected in coordination with Project LIPEAT, e, Coomdination-with-theparaltel;[___——s|projeot - LIZNVOY, ts Sloscly coomlinated between the responsible Case Officers of beth projects, particularly relating to ths division of coverage between the two operations, thereby assuring that the LIFEAT operation will not be cenJangered by the | of the LIENVOY operation, ad. Although there is no direct connection with the recently activated LINACK operation of the Merida Base, LIFEAT experterce in [~_ ]telephone tap procedures ari easpectally security and processing of informatian, aided COB Merida in eetting up the LIHACK operation, Personne} a, Career and Contract Agents (1) David 4, WILSTED (201-0091%5), princtpal "cutsldd’ Case Officer, (2) Wayne C. ORARAMD (201-2550%), outside assistant te David M, WILSTID, DRARAND was introduced into the LIFEAT operation in November 1961. His OA was amended 14 November 19G1 to provide for hin use in this operation, tis tour in Mexico kas recently been extended to November 1964, (3) LIEMORACE-8 (201-111616) was introduced into the LIFEAT operation és backup technician to WILSTED, He was actively employed in the technical phase of the operation during the home leave period of WILSTED in December 1962 and January 1963, Since LIEMSRACE-8 continues with his normal functions under MKCHARITY. he will not be funded under LIFEAT except in the event of WILSTED's prolenged absence or incapacity. LEEMERACE-ti's OA was amended 7 April 1962 to allow his use in LIFEAT, 4 . ete ae oan . Son
yO Coon : By EISTS [ Pres td phocastex/” ~ translater and-forszer ‘baschousekeeper who can be recalled - ‘for: temporary Teassignnent to basehousekeeping duties, (S) Olea a. PARKINIK {201- 117978), LIFEAT processor/translater, OA for LIFEAT employment dated - 28 Septerber 1964, ‘b. Field Agents 7 (1) LEFEup-1, GA granted 17 October 1950 (201-182704) (2) -LIPEUD-2, OA granted 14 August 1951 (201-117971). : (3) LIFEUD-3, OA eranted 18 December 1953 (201-117971) ae (3) LIFEVD-4, OA granted 1 October 1953 (201-117743) eee | (5S) LIFEUD-5, OA granted 16 December 1953 (201-117794) (6) LIFEWD-6, See Olga PARFINIK - Contract Agent section above (7) LIFEUD-7, OA granted 21 October 1958 (201-117980) (8) LIFEUD-8, OA granted 312 Mareh 1955 (201-1121) | (9) LIFEvD-9, OA granted 27 April 1956 (201-117984) (10) LIFEUD-10, OA granted 13 September 1956 (201-114085) (31) GIFEUD-11, OA granted 21 August 1956 (2012-11359) (12) LIFELD-12, OA granted 6 August 1956 (201-113%669) (13) LIFEUD-135, OA granted 13 September 1556 (201-115833) (18) LIFEUD-15, OA granted 19 January 1957 (201-126315; (15) LIFEUD-16, OA granted 2 July 1958 (201-222786) (16) LIFEm-18, OA granted 2 October 1957 (201-185770) (17) LIFEUD-19, OA granted 18 May 1960 (201-262488) (18) LIFEUD-22, (formerly LILILLY-1), amendment of OA requested 24 April 1962 (201-288248) (19) Lrreum-25, (formerly LILILLY-2), amendment of OA requested 24 April 1962, (201-305604) (20) .LIFEUD-24, OA granted 24 September 1962 (201-119525) (21) LIFEUD-25, OA granted 3} January 1963 (201-3323%5) (22) LIFFUD-26, POA granted, OA requested 31 October 1962 (201-3323%) ce. During the past project year -the following personnel were dropped from Project LIFEAT, for reasons noted below, (1) LIFEUD-18 (201-117972) and LIFEUD-17 (201-195370). ‘This couple, having experienced a number of apparently insoluble marital problems, mutually decided upon separation and eventual divorcee, Since treir use in LIFEAT (as basehousekeepers) would not be posstble with the breakup of their home, they were terminated as of %O September 1962. Termination was effected on a mutually agreeable basis and ne security problem has arisen to date, nor is any expected in the future, whe & aa . x Pop de a Fu te
10. ll, “directly. env z i ork “Et had: been ‘original G to use LIEROOE basehiouse aa the verminus for ‘the ‘LIFEAT/MKTRAP technical - operation targeted against the ‘official LIERODE mission. in. Mexico, City, LIFFUD=22 and 23 were to havé been the basehousekeepers for this operation, When 1t was ‘found that the MKTRAP operation could rnot be routed to thie basehouse because of tectinical considerations ,. the base was ‘employed as &@ photosurveillance base targeted against the LIERGDE mission, Since this operation is not connected with LIFEAT operations or personnel, these two agents will no longer be carried under the “‘LIFEAT project. — (3), LIFEuD'27 (201-332331) was granted a POA on 20 September 1962 ‘for use as an alterriate LIFRAT basehousekeeper, However, due to a change of plans envolving agents's availability for LIFEAT work, she was never recruited and this clearance was cancelled on 25 January 1963, Operational Clearances See Sestion 9 above, Cover There are no changes in the cover of personnel] who have been previously employed in the LIFEAT operation, With the new egents employed since the last project renewal, cover is aa follows: a. _ LIFEUD- 24 has natural cover of maneger of a amall profitable * medicine distributership in Mexico City, Subject's office hours and activities are therefore not scrutinized by 4a superior and subject can devote the necessary time to his LIFEAT duties and cover his LIFEAT salary without difficulty, LIFEUD-26 has natural cover of housewife (wife of LIFEUD-24) and mother, She performs her LIFEAT duties only in her home {LIFEAT ANNEX VI). LIFEUD-<2 has natural cover of the wife of a retired businessman (LIFEUD-4). A review of LIFEAT personnel files during the past year revealed she had been ineluded on her husband's clearance request in 1953 but had never been granted clearance in “her om right", This was corrected when on 3 January 1963 LIFEUD-25 was granted a full OA,