or rane Sule Ee. SN, RE Rao ah eed + wth OS Aa, aint tA Sen Fahd ~ a ee tee ESA anil Datta eaten Ince olin UA A ee eee 5 a oss wah MRT salen it sl acer | Gd vs 5 ‘Ss | po - # ; | | 3s . - Lo tate a ana ABE AN es : ton a _ / ; ° odeg . Oo . — ne 3 was ' . ae s iaeay ge - ~ Pry ann enee a eae temeta inte GF tee ater ste tg .. . 7 ; : . 2 . 1 ° ‘ . tae . . - .
74-90000 oe at Nae segs “Ve 1 oe Beers as vt og } . ‘ at ; . ‘ t - . : - + “ a . . : y H H ~ wore 8 ony aa ! foe ee i : . i se . 4 ; . whe i a ~ i fo. i ~ : - } j 7 i i ‘ i ‘ : 1 ‘ ay SE eee eT amet
Oto |4 EET Die labidtnnct 4 q Oe , a= te leowneren ang op preitnd Hanmed i (Lec ef 6 tam Big Wacrticton. Cirernrs ty)
a a oe Fi us wicca) s Peers ae ZS spelen wm ip bg nove 9 80 ody ee,
| tn Mallon bas K travers Z [ ppermcen 3 aes Ag FY tye , Bnectenstl J, Ob0M, Re Wrrrwne Commmnndorres Lomtbe | aot. vb aC AWart nut &) i Oa
¢ Pane acl sentvitle wntdecse drome he | eens)” “hc hay Boaraled Ape A feck Aaya batt 2 yprlad hg a a ae LS tn Ahnd thts 27 byebmbas BIB plod a © eset 1963. te tht pt o 7 ON TR ER ENP TED HONE
a ‘ os i Ce a ARH lh HP an 7 ; | os 8 ge be W a i 5 (ore . dows 72 = o a ce now | 7 4 7 yan Zl page ne Leeknel, LEA He Filia lrelaeeee ee cormene tomy ST)
a Mecirhes 13, je 7 = ating £¥ Us. t-te. breve Lg eeleced by me gree Mike Ae neon (bee frown hy hay cp zs ey Phin ot D f belodes_ frwrpedtoniy Mee wpsiloce Keele. wild em Joidgret ee endo fon a rein SF Cahn w beet 6% £ (it a. lle a0 6 wares Cd hi CH | ne ya cee yer nlwaphiany Gott tat bale Cakengtt pier amrete hay Hh, Halon nh Zend 28 Mote
CC ES ee 16 anes gry hee En ee fee nti tn nny a lge~ Ceres hor Kee - dl Ze eon. mh 8 ol 9 - ; mamma
w  Aeadtlenl Ay enor «me tate ; wat! tictigeitiend Gietes Lp (| Reethn aprn by Baer) erm “ 4 7 A Foek to 7 saclecte oe es poe ee |
a me a oe , Booel am Z : ne mene Lalag Bor é g . , a in . Lp a
O&€ Te Myles Gh futece LA pre worn Mlany : (RE dip tm Gyltntee desert m Ve | . epee Ce fahes ESE evel me teats Bray Tn shetins ayertes Hin fifiihe Ts | Cette toriieschant Lefont, faa Barking ed fe ff & phd bern . “a atihd b Oe . CX,
Gi frome etwe! P? r. prea kd > KEE tae ered raf pon £Taarelien - of dvth wet a ao 4 7 pa GF & 22 l pt 2322 hin atl amtanht 3 A. aN
‘Ss iuos: Bay 'eo OK trong 3 . aa A dyin tent ons aleS 7. Salve ram te road aie al A. FT Sup 1403 Snag oe ate concentra oe AO oy stave. tells that . the Amortean citizen WBS thore, the one’ Whe wants visa for Cuba on his way to the SovieS Union and he Svants- to knos with whom he was talking there because sha: (Silvia) had “sent him to the Soviet Embassy : saying that if they Rocepted hin | and gave him a viea then the Cubana (Embassy) world alao give him ~ a visa without further paper work only adviai: AS Immigration in Cuba — at waits to imoyv with whom.hs had_talssd there bar 2 ae: ua A D: sya) j Tees o Wa: se ried rererameeee ‘na was told there ‘would bagno problem, ‘ : , ‘A different & isbiigaprene dani Oilvia exp taina the sams thigs to him,” Thise Bays, to” ye nom? and. telephone nunber and gab call " Silvia givéR telephone 11-28-47 (Cuban Consulat?), genni states she. haa. noved SilV a ba oer) advantage of. the “Bbeus and wants ‘to advise ‘the Sgviet Embggay of her change of address so" thet she “can. receive the, sein Raia call KOUKHARENKO to foo give cher new address, .th ths name ef the Consul or ..  Cuitiral “Attaché, i Silvi anys th am is Teresa PROENZA: and thé | veephons number 4s Ate poi : t . f
iar Slivia ara hej Jthe Anordona ‘showed, tT? rere. treet , 2 UAL” ke wants to 69. to. the Soviet whe is Rugsfan, eort fron vagtlagt ress in. reerect ‘ta this 2 to this precsdure it lakes four os five ! ths, cut having permilssich fron ths Soviet Union - : Shey should ask, or better said, they cannot league a via here witace % agking Washineteny hevover, acconlins to. this can | : ; “hs Moved a letter indicating he way a marbver of an oreasization ‘ van faver of Guba and that the Cubana said thet they caasct issue, ; va “J mow ga Phy ‘ ] yo, MY RA WE TRoat bog havdag a viea for, the Sovist Union; an plge j Bt (Nea Act knov what to do with hin’ (the! Amey oan), decauss they ° sy * “lBavt to vats for the aS yor frea Xa Washington, ths) . a a an mn ; ‘aaa 7 ae predies axlate "witht the Cs pi@e@, Chet Tut pro ome ek fa ‘ _ (the American) fe that be dete not bec anyoca in Cure ace Sgrefore if that ds Grua it will Le,difficult for his tz ceh a wise for Cute, tecausa he ves! thinkiss of processise wig cian ue » (fex- Soviss Uatoa), becapat he’ kKusw it Would require vattise a ~ oa } “Leng tine for his visa to the Sovist Unten while in Cxta end fro i? ‘Y there go-to “the Soviet Union, BI sald tha thing ia . oo 3 ‘wife tish® RoW, were in Washington she would receive Te + right Sho, or yernissioa, froa the Soviet, Union, to oe ‘ ‘ eeuatsy, she is going to receive her: visa’ in Washing eee ie having a ; ‘this: vis’; ake ‘could oomminicate to any place thio prrnission, ; Ctl ‘i for exaspis here or any place She could. receive “it (visa ox peraission) He whe bot pisht now, they do not have then, (no las tienen). Sdlvia’ ‘gaya : ‘ aoa Loartainiy and! they: ‘cannot give a letter either because 2key dd not hs ane, a “ykhow Lf the visa Will be approved. ‘MI lsayo, they only sive visas Loe ; jaccontins to: to. iudicatiens , Siivia’s Saya than she wili “yet-that on the Sp ise BE ‘Saye be" ‘emingt: “Bive” a latter Of recommenda: tiok either 77 cResauss Ne dots. not mow hier the Ancr ase wa Pe : , your 'SiVi8 &.gays tse 48 alr ght ar aan) babs excuses =a for vothering ; | - f . oy oe FF et “99 7 te iy ty Re wa Ms og pe et ia ot: <a ro DJ e 7 Or AF Ft 403 (Sabine is] Wins OF “ “ee TR ge re awa ds ~¢ . Te ee gt OE . ae . ee wSdbvie-came hat in- hs, Cuban Ecbassy fis a North Awarizay who was at ; , tha: Sovies Exbassy, Be ie a sinute, Silvif’¥era; SP raedial with j “ith s Sorecre > and comhents “in Spanish that th APARICIO telephone 5-12-59 snd to take the nunber down Silvia o feos ws dmerican: obo ites ne is going to talk with yo forere Ruscian Py . = ors “in English. They continue nglish.(“uerisan talke wey kt ‘peed \passian fae Sayp Feypo tn: ear By ssy\and\s cas to your congul, 2 Just a paate la iene and asks/hher tA Engt ash what does be vant : Azerican ‘Bays, “Please speak: “Russian. : ; you vant? Areric says vasTiust now at you . . ny stdeesel cs I know thier tcas; hANtIy redesiizable mo _ “EESSTESTSEYS I did not kmow it then.’ I went/to gb2 cotsp nkassy wit ita | gsc then for ry addrseS; bechiss Tey hav it, Casati on!t.. ‘yous ssain and leave your address with fs, it is Snot Tar fro the | Cees Erbegsy. arican gays I'll be theye right away. : ar ee acs A (6 Xl Sou ott ra) e ' : a FLEET A YOY SCT REIN SY AEE RSE one FEO EIIRLR YI Ante esse SEINE ot 7 aE APD = ain tpn: Sr = e a REI TSR CEP a or EL I I TI LT TIE NEP TNE MS
/i!) ee Nonoani, Ts mer “at: your place last Saturday and talk i, Coasul, They said that they'd send a telegram to eo . - and Ewaiited to eal you if there is anything new? “Phays Ita: ; ' aoe Like to:ask you to call ‘anothsr phone number, Pleasa write is fo oa ‘dowd  AG260=55 pnd ask for a ;Consua. Thank you. i ocd Saye Pee Ha eR adh eet , : [eevee tes TO OE EIS My TT THAI OG ty TRA th amd e. / Batre [963 (Totaly) « to: 10:45 te teplag ~ the sam ‘perecen who ‘phoned a day dr so! ago nd spoke in citn Russian) speaks to OBYEDKOV,,(He sayssZhig ia Lee | CSD LD speaking. I was at your plac last Saturday “and spoks t¥a consul;~and they said that ths} Ksshingten, 60 I wanted :to find out“if you have anythingneet ; Bat. I don't remember thé name of phat consul BYE DKOV ‘sayss XOSTIXOV. He is dark (hair or sjdni7). ‘aw yes, my ram ts CSVALD. OBYEDKOV Gays, Just & minute r'itind out. They say that they haven't rece ived/any thing yet, OG WALD. sayatEave __ thay done anything? CBYSDKOY’ says: Yes, they say\that a request “has Deen sent out, but. nothing has been received at. ‘OQSKALD says And what...? PEMEDKOV hangs up, sas eR Bo ete o canay ame Po aan . am, o pas ae ty Bcix
Lovet. ott Hg ita fe 4 oes tre tin pent Corl ‘ SRO OS. AEE
r Ste ‘Mr 83; fa: “Call. en: ths other . phone’ Pee 4 for. aw visa Ko. £0. £6 Russia. img gays: Pleasé, ae, on th Léphione | of. the: consul, 45 15=60+55.. ~ morisnt ' please, Fr: ‘have « -t6 “geb-a paact 6 to ast e: “Rus numbe’r . | downs” cothey ‘Agaue: tis visa there. hy that depen sda your . ecnveraation.. oe: don't: know about / hig business. Ti lense -cé, weil nuniber ‘again TE Bs gives Rim. thocnu 7 the’ Consul ‘of. phon et En tia
- a Mieert , an eB et ah, oe er . 5. a Sm web oe ieee Sete tt ots te oo a 7 ° 7 an 4 hg ate ¢ av oe:
14-00000 _ fe _STATiON SyouD PASS. INES REF AND PARA Gxc to oh, 64.4 keenly aes) lt hey on) SE BE, a Nag, ant vs - a0 “AND ‘TAREE ORIGINATES ETH ER! BS \ oe. REF, sip POSSIBLE IDENTIFICATION: PF @ DISSEMINATED Fe aks ¢ ov bone! SINE) dsc a bee. prs LEED ne . A ES “ges tou 'SED'ON ANY. FURTHER CONTACTS OR POSITIVE DEX TIFICAT | : - “OS OSHALD, ne oo a Rid f He Ss Scis39 tah Diss eB £3 ' oo - / che csaieon/Regan ' din \eratts aes {spa i: serkag Orn : yee Dit BAK ~~ "WH earay Pies f, ° : ef TB INESSINES” * c HY ‘3 SERED cette ’ eth anon” perks: tre prascee , emai tye oa! temet tt “Verelaserg and AUTH &TECS | - Offtere’\ 8 ~Gactess: ‘cation « J Test: NG OFFICE 1S FROMILITED, a , ~ "| REERODUCTION BY OTFIER THAN THE ty ~ ad . . «ee ie te
14-00000 ; Z f . , a» fi dé Serena. . es - oF. (Hevea 6 oS OE, Ape é ae rae - —eerpseimayay cot 35/4 AYERTCAN MALE U7! SBOKE SOAKEN RUSSIAN a ay rr) “rs. Nae po asuaLa. CPRONET IC), ‘STATED, HE “MEE x 'SPOVE. a N conse HOM HE. ELIE ven” SLER LY, Lap IHTeqv row VOST TP ony, suey ASNED. Souteuse, DIAN aye DKOM wo: ANSYER ATyy savers ‘ON 9g . - beeen IF THERE: ERED S ae SNYTNTNG Sew R fife To ASHINGT ON: oavenxo “USN ase Satn ig NOTHING, APECEIVED UT REQ! Hap PEN SENT. 2 aan a 3 SAR we AER TON ENTEPING ‘Sout “1716 | y. . Mey Fate pe 1 SOURS, LEAVIN yo99 ON P CCT. APPARENT ACE 35, ATHELTIC autio, f1PGa. 8 Snes, RECEDING HAIRLINE, Abie TOP. ORE KHAKIS ; | Say SPP T, Sey HIRT. — Serra pnd . Oo | Oe : { : 19, Be 10 Ofrhee 1963 af 2eid Be oy Me Wh ars epee” tee Trt hE qaeliny an They Ag nT” rae TG - tis Mage I Wl, FB] amt ye bn ee OA Letiel Pome th wl, Abeer] necesened [orn Meee bit Condy te ULSI ee Aah SE
xT Of 1 OCTOSER 1953 A RELIABLE, AND SENSIT SLVE SOURCE: " t | | | iv LORICO RErouTrn ote AT ANAS TORYCAN HALE ie) APENTEFEED an . er or ste »? US EOF ASG YS ou OsvAcn,. co: reacTEn THR fovrs aT port St in : seicaeeies ‘ ‘ EXECO, CITY! ag QUIRENG WHET, HER THE: JENBASSY HAD. BECELVED, are | : Lee ANY NEWS Coren WING A TOLEGRAU Wws1cu RAD wey, ahr TO vs on powans ae a — seer ro thers Son arte ra ee ot Ae o erate SASTANGTO: st, tHe EMR ICAN WAS BISCRIPED AS APPROZTPATELY | ana hee qrean , ° Pe) we SS YEARS OD, WIT “AN AviILET IC ‘BUILD, ARSUT Six Ber rann; | Seo vneen As “aocwtie | HArReite. BO - coe fy 7 ee “ ~ Fo nena eer Reet aunrerweneea we oe see here cetoree + se teers TICAL ‘TO LES a ‘2. Af. 18° BELIEVED THAT. CSVALD RAY B 3 IDEN (ie: Tay i oe ALY OF TALD, TORS ON 38 OCTOBER 939. aw NEW: ORLEAR 8, woursrars, A TORUER - U.S, aus RINE TO DEFEC ‘TED: 70° whe OOVYET UNION: aN : i “OCMEOBER TOES AND, LATER NAGR ARR tA ie NES TUROUT! TUE {NITED STATES EMBAUSY YN Losey TO ne mu To TRE UNITE STATES WISH a hag See. & ». ore aay 3 Hs RUSSIAN BOs" VEFE, LAR WIOLADWs { PUSanoys 3.0 30S aye POAT ION IN PARAGRAPH ONS 13 BSING DISSTuINATED 3 IN MENICO Caty, “ANY FURTHER LUFORUATION ; “gO YOUR RAPARGESTATIVE RECHIVED CN THYS SURIECT WILL PE FURISUED YOU. THIS INVORMATION | . £5 BELNG NADE AVAILABLE TO THE THACGRATION AND NATURALIZATION. ‘ ig ee DL, hirkywEnw Lob. x ~ pod Llpipen ke Bees soulelg hove Atered mete Stree ees he ' i i ' [- | ' i | ‘
Len, Vystiark” fre pope go pote bnew oe A 2 so pony wu awd = at LE Bel ; | ae CE ear te
14-00000 x . . a, we “ C3. LE OSFALD WHO CALLED SOVEWB 1 COT PROBALLY IDENTICAL” LES: NERY S S5aat fetoaroy {HORN 18 CCt 1939, Ney onLZANs, Losistava, FONE RA OPERATOR IN UNITED STAT BS MARINES. - HO DE ¥SCT=9 oo Ussz_ ES CCT. 1959, ‘OSTALD 3 FIVE tre oR cay INCHES, | ons  ECNDESD SIXTT FIVE POUNDS, LIGUT DROWN WAY" HAIR, i ° .* . ns BLUES BYSS. i onenrenetinner Saciman “2. ON: ‘Sect 1959 HE ATTEMPTED TO: RENOUNCE BE 'S UNETED | conan tee an Se erecrmmion econ Jos) 5) STATES. CYTEZSNESIP- 70 THE UNITSD ST ATES. EB IN wOscoH, oo | “WWDICATING & ES EAD APPLIED. FOR SOVIET CITIZENSHIP, ‘ON 43 ¥2B * que US EMR woscoa RECEIVED AN UNDATSD LETTER FROM OSWALD, 7 POSTMARKED, MIs oN, FIVE FEB. igs? IN WHICH SUBI INDICATED | He DESTRSD RETRY oF gg US “por As ISHED TO RETUAN TO GSA Z| Af, "WS WS COULD CxS ‘TO; SCUS “AGRESMENT ‘concaanine TES DBOPPING - - oF ANY LEGAL Bo DCSRDINGS AGAINST Ms, 7 _ ON 8 SULY. ON HIS OWN INiT? ATIVE, BS APPEARSD AT THE ENB WITH ‘yrs WITS TO SES AZOUT > . Moj-LS72 LE 31S RETURN To STATES. SUBJ ST: ATED THAT cat ACTUALLY BaD NSVAR re AP2E "TED FOR soyrst. CITIZE ENSHEP AND THAT HIS APPLICATION Az (6 3. ek a esoRoINaTING, orrigeas . caouPt 7 (CoyPinvEn yp; Reclot edt from autemate | - AUTHENTICATING - FEI@ER : sf OR. co ae -_ . torngredeg aad * : o> GechaiRatoa” s . REPROD epee 8Y OTHER THAN AN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED, vO. Copy No “"Reteas Treeree ep ~
r| THAT TIME HAD BEEN TO REUAIN IN USSR AND FOR FTEYPCRART EATENSICN OF HIS TOURIST VISA PSNDING OCTCCMS OF HS REQUSST, EIS - / APPLICATION, ACCORDING TO OSTALD, CONTAINED NO REY TS SOFTER? coTIZaNsErD, OSWALD STATED THAT’ BAD BSEN EMPLOYSD SINCS | “YS SAN. 1980 IN BSLORUSSIAN RADIO AND TV FACTCAT. IN uswss | \ _NHSRE onic AS METAL WORESS IN RSSHANCH BiOR, OsieAeD. 338, ee ae MARRIED On. 30 APRIL 1981 TQ MANINA NIKOLAEYNA PUSANOVA. a. DENTAL: TECHNICIAN BORW.27 uRY xO4 USSR. NO. EDQS T TRACES, | oS avrsurreD arsaNcs FOR NiFS TO JOIN: HIM IN MOSCC¥ So SES ek Pera, COULD APPEAR AT ExB FOR VISA INTERVISY, HS AYSSICAN PIT a a | wis. RETURNED To HIM, US. Sus -woseow STATED: TWENTY UONTES | a Sean eee es cremate at On ke a neptone ee a . . i - “ ~ oF: REAL ISS OF Liss IN SOVIET UNION HAD CESABLY JAD MATURING” EFFECT OF OSWALD.- cr ? a FBR 3, [LATSST HBaS INTO As pnactoy fs SPORT DATED’ wat 2982 | SAYING epson IAD DEYERUINSD CSFALD IS. STH. us CIT1Z8N AND ie BOTH i aS ae HIS SOVIST Nise HAYS EXIT -peRuris AND DEPT stars {OT ew eee ee oprerey z a eee nes HAD GIVEN APPROVAL FOR THSIN TRAVEL WITH THEIR INFANT CBE TO USA. oe Jf . . . . h CasuP F ‘£acte adad foe gutomane f "+ deengrasers as declanonest, OS. ABTHENTICATING ~ OFFICER ‘ TRASANG OFF ER PROA! 3ITED: Copy No, “bo ecregen:
AL ; BR bontgeae Beet food do tM sy ean name tn at os os pas . ‘ Maer D Ig M hee Mesut Bonet _ yay Cf. 13 am cp PM CT gat oar Saag
cao, Log Pada, Aone tée. ew ae Le gee, ae v ak Sy 4 oe pe ey wanes . x “Sy ats 5 % titans 1 powel nr Ze Joye er Caf ~ 2 DZ. a Erste ae cot, Laer ate “as eG — by tosis pT? “AS. ogee’ of 7
& 1 Q, yn oe i a ue Lee gi an | Me: ob - prt, vidllen Ce ye hea ee-g Y Atl - C6/ Ey peng 2 thal 503, ' ‘ . i | ws brawl i ‘ . i a : acai fo oo AT Bag e fos” ois ete, a9 age bey, F ae be nip (2 MW Gtk, Re Spting ‘REQUE: PR . fORITY POUCH PHOTO OSWALD ae THAT STATION cont CHECK AL RECE: NT Yorgrry COVERAGE FOR ttc aw AR DING SOONEST CCPIES OF | ONLY VISITOR To SOVEMB eect WHO COULD | BE IDENTICAL wiry 7 WALD, (
" @ nes ged fee Ltoag- POOL. 3. Ze . ? LZ. s feat. é ” &¢ recente Core Ea ih feof rhewls os er a ; a, ohne aa ol ea ee > pe bated men eel of), rh lo pe bone decerembecl agp pony oben I ail pee linet ane De acl he dispel jin Ved see. bu Been eee wert ot tinier tre i o, fh, bade oe, 22 Ninn vl | aky at pte 1 Aw 3 Jb Apt ote | errors Comey Z pene rae Y Witadun Pe a oe
* a 2 aM Nome ‘ ; I aoe . ‘ 7 . . . ‘2 . woke ALE ache a are. copiés of the ie only: pblotuyraphs Gbt: ained ee - 7 . |" Gan October 19) 796: . wher appe Jsamel to be an Amorican. Ta WATS. man \ visited a oe the’ Soviet Embaqsy on 4 October 1963. . t ’ aie _ Caites: of these: vhotogtaph were ‘shown, to The U. S. Ambissador “\ - aye ; . of each ofthe two hotographs was given | to : a ~ 4 i bo. Dole TL op. s. Photog jeaphs dated 15 October aa re inserted after typing 6”. | . of dispatch. These were taken a person entere qd: the Guban : j . | ~ : Einba: sy. an A : ° LL — t | | a wee . 7" - ore “—s ; \ : MEXE°SHATION HAS PHOTCS SANE UNIDENTIFIZD AMERICAN | SYPE WHO IS POS$IBLY] OSYALD ENTERING CU3AN ENEASSY One 13 | : 7 OCTOBER. SEAR: ING FOR POSSIBILITY Y PHOTO- -DGcuMeN TED: ENTRY : ) €YBAN EMBASSY OFKER DAYS. — i vo 2. ALSO ATTEMPTING ESTABLISH OSWALD ENTRY AND DEPARTURE ' BEKICA
as (rer rn Peay; oe hed we ert ae an » ge wee » ss ¥ * - . . el phorlRer 0, EO Te ovat we f BR 1S pnd ee at ae Li gs ; é “> + thee” 2 PS see Pre x4 if deve ree! ie Te fn gu Ke O ered teu Ce’ 2 4 - vas Srmey La ee. Me Meret ms ue - TeteMies GE Chap pie Mert ED vayprle pln ae ope 4 hkl futle flilagdors. wee OE at Wim Mos he pA Pe, Bhi A ip, ! a4 ' aan ~ : 3 ' ' That \ ““GLleo ; eps 7% ‘hacia beh af ald in “pct suit | 7 eck/ Gone Me ntlpr ARLE wtih any | : ge [erty edcnlany 6 iz KS cama
aA Me CPR Pom ; 23 an ca ES : Pagan a od : | i | |, PHOTCS AGAIN | ! QR HAVE JUST RE-EMPHASIZED TO ODENVY HORS THE SENSI IvVITy OF I ' PHOTOS rou AdE SENDING AND ALSO RELAYED NAMES OF TRAVELERS | ;  Wity SIMILAR NAMES, NOTE RADIO SAYS OSWALD LIVED UNDER ALIAS OF. H 0.4. LEE, ;
tee + ota Law fe van Melaresel Lion 1 FSS ‘ee ‘Wjelacence ig made to our coaversation of 22 Noventbeepi { requesteft t paeniis gion, ty give the Le. gal Attache cogies of phots2 a evrtain geryda who is known to! you, . graphy oF aA tached. are 5 copies, of each ot the photographs we have with the dates of the visits Starnped on ‘the back. ; JAY: b. ‘Dp. me d tekico time’ oa 2 2 November, The Ambas ador decided . Ae MR Mee Ad END BE BAMA Onteee ass at Abd bbe WN ding Bes wishes, . . “- 7 oer AML, 2 hg lari lore Cle Ken. , Of ag VRE Pe ; / f ‘ Dee deciet gesit 4 oo, oa AG
M Ca tigi f?: Pail a Re Tereer , fps ene ah ~~ (hogfiert mii Go ae 24 Tees ghee Borne ant a Cues, . 4 ze fon ‘ cots yan Ge Maw anti (cae nde heghonne che. (22:54 ae 23Mar 1963) 2 Der low ez, AS oe PTO TET? Heng ETE
Corewn se : &. reglle oe a ports 7, ae L fy =e AES a
36, Wi Love bu on) tonnen ed Tong 7 Acacr, 2 ae Ceontlin teat ame, Attache mas ‘ at fr wrheit 6 Lhe Crist Lire lin? a oe i (tapeteek, Yar Ie x pe Spey shee a wlecidnd oR i Ati Raed wets Le Covwata Busts tal, ta Re 0 one pape iol, w | Clery iL “Te Lane pnts hen hyo. spekutans LE sogrn. Sd) me fhe ho Zi, ed ALAA LE ena OE Fa a “ow put é ha prat % Cong Ps “et F een $9, jee» (or ther= L. eta “yy a = gon Fe pee there Fae Anne a. "hogs a fae e
at x e e sm pes . ee . oy +e ay } £ Fp eee wet 7, bead af” & , at bog fem Few a é 7 , . ne — “4 ” . «6 rey tA be Biws ce LEA Dputadan opt ee get’ ? 2 we fe EFY “4 oy hy ah ae ses «= pee need ~ Levene ath 7 oe “& sot anses 2 inp ran : ; o bets, jp tow ke: es ideihit gest oo | oo a 7 eihent perl’, dm am . (LF ms ples a Lowrnid pare. ioe an rlahte, teu OT ime : wes nat & bor, A hapa . | uefaere dyperench emagtr b Ci halons thy 2279 Y Nyy, Hf phat gph 1 Orth write lerte burly dL loth ovecmene dining,
14-00000 + . . . ~ ve . , . t + 7 . 2 = - - . . - . j as, : . . . - . . e ” * ‘ t i ’ - . . ° : i a ‘ . woe - - - - eon . bd , ° . . re? Pepto tae eee
14-00000 Ee a Pe GL Aawiy an ; “Er Vise ZS CPE: al 780 ie ad 2 os RE ne TF gue — | : peoenicty Oe ha 7 ils fe ae lr a cucbit ee en 2 nga teat Tee, wv LNs fap EEE, a ‘ee Ff Painer’, OPE CUPL MH. Zoe a ° bey ie. ae Rcomateal (eve 2 -ar- “—s 1 [Momreed, © then Tf very G Oe Ly Love ee, ff teste On wen) ahs Lantlinn 1 2 — _ EU Es He nl Ey BETS atte ent : ere ae ie 4, Pr pes Gos:
14-00000 apie ere een az cade wn bn, 7 — Be : @ . a <p vel! ities have ce c: eater li m4 gh Ls & hems * wk 7 |  Fertoontey Crete ep yy Zee F Ci we [titres Lael” & es 5 we slagiete see ee S toe Sete G a: ti ban * ‘ ie “ = _leeten ee > : ’ - : . [4 Met peey ev ae Pte ~ “ at) , i . Ay 08 gm BT OS bn tte. Pian wef at noe, Pe eT , if suas oa, Enea ani U
74-90000 / . ie . seen ~e ve Wied y eS ae Coe an Lf Se a - , “9 , uf ee, [s My f - . “ / - La pS ot 3 _ Bw atl. oot: v Pow. Spheres “neg : -_ no Lok oe Angel Cpa Jicn fiw, ra ) faves, ioe Axe lpn ae ete Adimeoee BEETS Trang Gs 5 fa Re Af Chagas wtf Kevana) om Bho ae 3G. (lets: eb&ein nee ie Oe Os ff pe EBh Mae oc EL, epee ad Mer top ad Aho danke Gey eG oh . A eyt ls, n Weyat oh 4 mae pers Tey fe Aa ur. wee Gee “Una he. or frye wet? Lao f ot pos - Ad om Chae is _ A a ba bch
14-00000 Set 4 era eds, NG \ ph, ste xh. . iv pipe: if a eA che . | . ; - 2 . a : . . Oo wa po ~ mo ° . ° . = a So ua os oo —— " fe rs JOE oe Be fh. rf f a 2 ° r a . ee L.Ed ye Pea oe LS Vice ae, Site  Plae : é . ; - tf co 2 . Lp 2 ; -, , : : vrnetztirs§& nl deat idk oc < Se . oo an ve ; ’ Mo Leg gee" ff ” A 4 Sans Cans —_ “ty . ev ’ 2 sf vet a é * pe LU of fg eee els ont nen a be uptte. ¢ pee S 2 Be ern ®
14-00000 Sl athipse AGT oe 7 * een LO ae ens lees oy “of & ee Lap us iba t Lh Ta dln te me ee at 8 mca ate cranenn 8 es Spin Pe SA ea a tl Ziel wer - _ . a enters J : phi 7 OR EAs 7 are ween TCE. \Meree fr wh Dich a i Lae ve a a _ a for Mas STaCen ee, | at ae a ff 4 Ipc as wisi Mage tof : ee EN py he . eth ae 9 as && Rowe a terrwLel . len eel wae ey: a ais emp! Fro Ze hon t av wt. . wt tees ew, tomy
eee ne phipewtk A ! f eee il pet canal SO yd Na ot pea ed nea a an bene eo ore . STS eee ce anaes wah? vie Mai ain an a Os poceele. ‘ ’ tee? oe inn loo op ‘See-ae Cee a7) . . 7 tons beyert ms a aiken 7, Poe ayes + : . 4 ao Oe eres welt Laid See f. SMa simone attains epee 4 eT I piles ne
14-00000 - . ” . ‘ ‘ A, : oa 7 aa = 2 oe a ‘ it~ aw, p wf ae 3 y ‘ “ oa aa 7 tt ettia Se ee LA ag 4 Robe ty bane. hat ‘ o ous toe rae r en *e 89 Cae Sms aot cee ote re a aren ae a : Luthe Ct flere sree, Aes fevet f ges . irae 1 dung ca “ Me ee er et ee now a ’ “ wee - . - . : It Oar Lae oo lated’ 54 fry a Bs a ak pilin Te Ca Peete cs mpd colin wee mene ty ty anette Ailes eS t, A he. foo laa (Beare: + ; A thet tetany olentt eet ‘, tt; AER LOR zit , e herr 1. . Anat ao prtttten, wl ee £3 a re Aw tf eral - oA «! we Ae 7, / 4 , ya . ; i) , . cae \ ceesng| wht HLL “oy pry eon “BE, eee we see ee ee 4 ‘ ° - Ay \ ? Ay a TAK Pe 6 ; oo ar i . Mls type Sy Koch, te les pretny a Ltfan Selon Sieg Ath Spree,
14-00000 . - ne . : ve s agen ra oe GW? oelite A odtepen,  , Fievs.. tees ove? 2 sy te Fst . ae  Jeyew. Lees : ; ee eee -” | i <a ete A Jt banka vers + cane : ae . ce | Le € axle y, oa Es kate aan : ry ae —_ : aie an vit t permet Pa pep ter Z blind hage : toe : eo 1 2 sa 7 ae wtfodt ) ate ro? , eo, / a ae a a “y freee awe . Ley 3 Le bug ale, ; wes Fin, bey beg. Le ~ are a ne ae * ; ‘ , aA . L1, “ee “ ye «! — ag a lowice # / eB ke “theg wh (eevee lL r e se er an : : ale , roy - yy, : su ? tor ar ae to oF Lg dh te ers Kay py ig : * 3 ; Semmes ° inet a See at Se — 7 _ . ‘ tt . ~ eee Sn a SS A ace ea once 2 oo 1 IT el oA, Stay a seni
he trcceclr 6S, ULLAL a ily te Cpe page CR try | us.
y4-00q00 - Wim yoru. hw. 23 ble, BS betters, V96¢ pti Be Sprlion | settle
peoteLihy mente by Ma Malo wi > Grr Gi 6 0. Ark Ry Pet opten-
14-00000 — sours SEED. os = TATION. FARdA BEARING an ocoment ae To eenrt oF oT . sepia twee te Meteo Stato. flee te Gs 76017) 4 Otte be sox" eect e Lo trees ein eget SS aed Gee EBL we Deg thy Newry COR (en METS) 1 7 a , | %. In eee) 10 DtaLn 1463, (22107 2 tee - 3 poy
Cen 10857) 4 V5 acta 1963. J cs “6 6 aie ere ror one Sete Charen iae3), Miyieo On. Wan Swf Chief | ry WH Werisern , Ma. I Kes ,
@ 7 me Con sine) 3 23 3 even 196s yh : Coat CO 7027 tn Te Sunn 988, 20s atnre- | are  Muyico » Stati AL Joes Ca 67 %% , 23 Ne (5es 33M Zz ah. 67252 , 2 73 WTA
a Ser 14 y cea TT Ey Te a Pawar ! wi er Hog te af oe j pee a | + Sad i\ g* Ue ; oly ee ~ yt ia * f 2 bey ~ ie £ a “ce oe ry a teriec Beitiin Lligh ms og Dede (Tn~ GM) 2A ~~ 963, £2 Bp x Venue ; | | on , Cle dye. Piligeanen CL Mey'co Helm , ; - 29" De - EFF2/ at CRF 22 ? 22 Mn 63, - 0/ 3b te 4 Aud On 22. ete, aeguetinss! pee 7 C Monit Wea Ce Zs Ly 7027 Um - aru), 23 Wr p63, Zo¥s 2 fins wo sana + pan A ma _ - — (Le 67/89)  menice Sadie Lligan 7927, 3 23 VETS, 2OYG 2 fun
14-00000 17, Pye Sting “T08S (Leu 69258), 7 ‘ erst - rs z < we , fs * * a « ‘ . ° - ae + ’ : e . . : . . we +. , , ” cs \ + . , e + ~ oo
Leeprc, & series Akese ALE er os ues | Ajoth For 3265, 4 pat ? act} - es aes ip bs cu o e3, ’ s Oe 15E3,
et a te fin JO hp apne a 0 bas (of fy wt foe eZ rt 9 pty et . o Odum | » oo £, MAteey a &, Chama | filme. Nencge,, 04. M00 “bd=70. LIN CLASSI FIED 8, Ryperte Tine Croom Sl cba Mol PAG (Herero vel x 92601 ) ame (Poe Echt 237 ( femreng 2 yh RD yy 3), UNCLASSIFIED
ee Fy po Bet ~ mers ony c67, oo ‘Ole chs ered egos otinnee Mrnetes tH Mnapeette Buenont : f i ay 1967, 2 poy 2 pry ‘meciriy ie oom Bey, 49470,
eee och, f Aad 197 W prcortin 1370 pnd 2¢ aod 7} hee. S970 « toy CWECAS ~ SIF/E D , Hae L tbed ih We; "Pye
14-00000 ae asenlla mon A Ripa doen, Bp | horine add pararner | ney prrclicnaee , t
AA boaters omens Utero oa Mew | “ pened ety rh, pl a ae ATs Ranta toy, ar To fey mm ce a ee = ot 48 Mae UR ee retin & Sewer
ET Eee OU a eh teeta EE EROS Lie MAL EL TET, BELT EE! TET LRT EER | ORD CLEP ETRE ET OTE LED , en
Dee 20S 4 Che rene eles, (Mendy Aide 20-20" nae ed wien Teg pet | ok AOC ee tn Agr, WT Had. —@. D Genk trideee + shag smneg bop Se Bhp KM (oe de) a ee al UET occ teva Ent RRO LE LT ET FL Le Fe I LI LE REE TIES IER, LOT EN IT LE EIR OO NY SOP WORT ni SERS ATROMIT cos NN a a ate Bele paiile Seal Nant Jane LR af ley ga as aaa PCE at AERTS ABE ater gett Ee OER SUL Pe SEED ofl SER eT Bue Hd LAST
14-00000 me . ; , FP eee Eee of pro Deeve est Freer eee he Pe . o . : - . ~f . v4 of ; help aa ; ¢ Cé wepe ran race Toran wre 4 : é . ’ 7 f o” fe - ET he flees Me Retr tes REEL Fo OE KO [ht ieee , a fo: . aan ae é . « iy 0 : 2 7 Pas .- soo pt, ee. ce ra ’ oe Pyparet Aa mt Ae Cperttatel f * . . wnat * Z ” . “y welts _— vet of whoa. we Vo verte: Ce frteae aes oa mes rodeos co alent . cneineot te. - tay soe teeta & "A an pre seca PY ehh tg peed L ; or fy ee fe ibe =f 7 hoe raat pyp eet gl se ff yf eotir lzeer tof Gobet, ies
D3 Pace -e (4s Le pot’ 1 gel Ud ee ivtec- Aves 4 At p - Stew a- fie en te ae lailogs o jo on ryt i Saliva Cow) mA Cg har , oa oe — tennis Cte > vie Wren” : hyn Hew bee  £L Joo, EES Can Devel. Entiors Mot: Lab CU bt 2 sone ee v wear wor pbecths Whit wers Co fe a Leraifl, fl thew Spevecl pencty Ctrifee? ees “ hr ed és Zi, Lobre.. 7. he Hemera 5 rr fee are tne pacar hewn ace Darien . poi S paved ance ay LO Cette Lefroy Be, wba $6 babrnk fonyete veiw » Kroc Lf orins Hey Jina ULE 3,
Heck aI ian OTe So pant ti Otte. Te a Mind ae pon ees ~4) | ot apd the LET iy The Hark ot ee pli te tnplnrs Ue fe potent (hep — i preabe hey, He Crt-
14-00000 ties - re wnelatsit Cf S fhm cle Loe on ser [Yr 6 ; Re fret wotedkise e Ze! ‘ forth KR Aitles ’ Kb Kaew ne 5, ‘neds ‘fia aw, ened, EEG eee A SS LT LS ET SL
(jn } he frien, , ; Coben Gafel™ wl, Cover Ly LZ hn hfe Ghous.) & ae PW ¢ Re Cf eins Ds Mecbera PeLedpe onsets, : | tae Ge fl 9 ve Ae . “ae i pret ey st ina - ee eid Ae Ch, é bese on | Peteek MMe wha we poeta, Hat gin | oot CA de (4 homey ees aan ee * hee sf - Aero. Taw Haren neseccrebe, ‘ek Pb, port ofotles : “oeee KES Mbzwd, hp Lo ee ay ortinl onl ah | A gloat gw eel, Mt fe. * Le a. ha Te Aka e ee . ' —— “Com ok, =) eae 67. Max pepe
* . wat an wot Ane “€ ee ge 176 S ¢eZ Joey peey: ve tne oa hy . a3 : Flet Qe “ LET POETS A tewn- Lupe cPeyrer fw tcg on reflect 4, he in, wry. Jo egin? al hice wee?” Mee oO Comme “hien Savee ron Pee. telnet Ss ae Culp fo oP Lowe bh,’ aeesTor Prete, ely fa precrcl te He 7 Arwwerlny om OS- fix cepeed : be, SEst# ws, ES, Enemy F ee, “a octane ra an AS fost? ST als Let Lex Liven, fee ’ ae to
FY fo, C bar mee y OF pone Ab-ae.ene¢ , vd. eo ann mie 3. a a <a preelpact fe gte “2 K awl ee Caer ae Biwten PO, y ed a Le foprer arlel *. PO eee ae Lew ; fof 4 et Low, fae Foon , OD. een Te eel OS as Cos , avd Thess lin CL Ae pine on fun! oe Loe oe her of eet cle ae oe a ie an eure TEE fix. foo oo a nin al a ape neem CE (ecb LL. % 2 7 ore oa frre A Es | Met Mh en, Ctl. nn, tt,’ fe oe. ek, , in Cor AVE. Chee ae Cee | Foot Bow itd. é a tee et Lov gee, Ww, oe fat Kaye wel % Ee ee ee be wh, awh pre Suetwal, Et Ge tory Ge, C (Ce onl n I Mey le CoG aewticl: thy #F Lon ZZ LY -L
14-00000 S gl bens gv Lee ste Sere Ole oy "18 «? “eae FUR } FETE mony . . ‘. if ve . > : aoe reeks cual . nw troy HY bee va hoc v ae - or. “4 Fra othe mewn He hele y Biba om Lime ned Lt Y, 2 is Eh. - om ttre, AK Eos sseed oe ee — 7 Lh ter Kathe pled &? “Ne, bone Ve. NO visas “My huh, . : a pene in , ef CLF Coreeetd LZ, ol SEE tne, Tg i boone Lat, 7 ee Gade ’ A ee ; hee wennn of af Lewy or foomny Bru hoe 6 rae eck, | ft é a? .. hace safe r € iZ ae “eee e - Step Le? seek A OEE. Zoe. Lbs Dees ons « Le “ oon a ae ed se 4 4p rae ptecewes/ Owen’? Pome. LS he ea a a Aa vp Gites LLG ft py lest “anenl ee, MAO ye, e@ ¢ ° - wa Awd he wh; APOE  wcee., eg > an wee. howd! pees hob, an dw reo whol | e
ie / - 2 /3 - ott fe - aig / Loe thet ee , CWC ee wl, wieler, as Dares ; ? os ¢" j af Care, jd? ver ft, mn fous “VW , tts Ape heh: og Cems Ate REE ; 4 od “% Uh, bas an fee Cifhve be, foe oo ae nes ile, Endre. bree ? a by es lon a nd “ng —- ee Ay pre aaa of rw hesten wT nye een Ce Qen€! A pot b Larceny Teer, bu - hile y tlic 2 arraflms th boa A tlt cto de stay eres Mt : Me hoelaley «Yow, 2 a ny a A gpa Shen fone soars bee eo 7 eg far) “7 oe thee, effaced howe dp | tate “7. lier Pr va tatasfleag ~ hepre, ff &G Ty Ae Age EE arnrk ty Ze Aad A an tr “Me Lette fled hc Lbb a bila Los ere Oe epeth, aol he n.. aemnnan ia aheont
14-00000 a4 2 4 a ° toy a > * , . - . ‘ -- , Ae Lo ete idvecs | Ak af to wee Locale ey pee , wt. + tps ew a ah : . ca - ela? “wy eed ae ne reste TE sree teers au Cer, y, : ~ : la — a . = A- ra ? - i oes hn! ? é 4 (Va del, pole. Mee fh, Cree, oy Le Lp laf bmos gir> ean T yj ~— an The,” COOSA thet ole ae eer Cah ~-£e, Cr? Ler” Low fern . feng Ro ree fe pel an “ Fenrsey lo 4 Z 2. — Cyems goes Pont Gee Gh, oot: — am ed —— e Fyre 9 yn Oo pty 6 Lassa men tin Jf the gor. ae ? erick fet Saree of Kem. eS ene ae mem een eee ae mee nen, tearm Neely Low ned —! 4 4é foe) ret. ia CL (LP na aan sonnet DL AEE fee ea PN cate | ya eH er oar ene, a Y pe , ; ig Lt. aed, aa ; Gomrek ayeple sata Sina” Cs WA Ll — rrrtde Snore. Lae 7 ceT> yg tele, i descey Caw yl Ly outer on Mates ee Con aan on Ss be x é Cine 16 ted oP y ch ales pelewrye : x, Mprirty Oy Diced (16, pee Ateelnad % a7 a fe , Hb af a Sree? ae hows Qh ou 1S (Lally LI5y, A f f ° , MM bg One met, “e - We Toc Lees Zé, ry fonts, € é o ‘ de ely Wy i iw ( RS x ™
14-00000 ye . rae saad wa ie & r i le, ANA fay Tak ty steake ly % ~fanas het \ te “s mete iL. aPeawett, | i Bae of . at Vamenta he fernr hy eos, 2 : A : oo NAL Lagegl a an} oO ” . “¢ } a) a $0 mee Mn mm ee for vnrnn oe oe conchae oe Benen vem mee, fe t a Rene “ weet Xe tg tig & ob Ae etn tok, / 2 ohana? Pd fe Meme OO Be ) te cod wees eee LhetoGES Dba t/ . cele ligi’ “se Lamy AZ Yi he cA reloel a a verlone ji kp tne oa Cay > MIL, Are y: ‘seme yi / lisenny LS, “ y . ae “pied wae cof. . prrbel Apwereed, af oo feetenanl 5 teow | a a ce / . US ~ GA. Lay lone tey fal Eprny antral ale, Latur, ratueul. oo 3 pram UY,
fo gt Leer oe af & lesbian Ree ete hy" a ¥J “ ca Cle. ee. wee Sty 13 td Bee gas thre. 02, at ne ae ath eR pnctcleet © Cp pe 6 freee, SHY : / é oC y ae, Eve ST mh, go bf? eel Cv POE pe beep lent WILL Seer” pen a suey G ete a ’ Qe pearl pee? deeseng, © ete hei Mee. ZL, pris pts, BS hos hen, Aeetapi dined’ 5 L cers ee firmed anti Mi, elen, “pte “s “ut erent gel Mf oe pie Creen € cae en lone
14-00000 22 k6 te ae brown tery: Se ehene Ls Ce actin acts “ uv ‘ - «-
aan jen COTE ote Greece Agartides afoly HE Kine, Boreale , | phi enced be” aT HE Srere; Atecg lig vw 7 Ane oP, My tn. Vice ot xe ‘caerte ‘imi ; Ania ra Cale and ea iw bff” ) peo ved, ; fronton prea | Mn Pk
? a ; ae + fe C é cep” tees “a, athe; ne ora aco Y “+ oar we oe er rad rd a . 7 and ~- : ‘ , ° * ot then A beet. poe Oe Che viet eer “ e . e — = 5 oes & a of Fo ~ ” « Brae oy eer, pan rs * a Chee pawn om. © o™Ere a cs eo” on a 4 KL, Lon - , . vy ~ & AY Wee bt-wevtew CS boty ee ett tee a jade c » tir * - °f . y Cn. t- Peg SAA ee Soe ee , Celene bP tee tiof, ole ? , ; . - “fp reid Lae gen ad “J 2, 4 teel sek wpe em tee £ ral ae A - f ° porate § bie 7S," fog on S wm be hotne, he oot , ’ ~ yy dae ro) Le ~ .¢ WW owat “ew evirthany O20 Mirnoe 40 1s63—- KLE leat pa: y /. Ate fT py - @ ACHS Ket er. : . uly Berg tom , te Mas ne (te . fewer. ae 4 oa . . i. mn Ooo “) Lkir LA pwn ett CA LCA F 7
hetot by th cnn C Co th, Leagptoeagl "p" —_aooro 6G. See, Repoat , te: 307 - 208. —— OSES | Opritia Co witl- Stoel. 1965 a Bex
th putin 9H tne a oe, i Obs 40f x Pallant ; a ! cay NOLEN TAOS HAST TCT TIT SETNESIY We -ONOOe ANON: emer YRC DDSI SSC TASS SP etre treba =
a Coreen 7 te Bote % (Bae 7 Stren (one ach prBientn, Dorm we Lo 1963) lasgpenar eet jigs
ee OS ru. ne hee 8, - . ‘ “ ‘ ‘ : a. . : TTT EMSRS iin as Se Spee ls nels be se to Ohne tore mibiatatingis EL ‘ / : 74 7 ' ne ° aah lad at at NN ce Ma a PES ete tinct CN. LB neal eta aatern at oS he tn onda onthe tenn BHR. (iad) ET ae
i Chin Np yess he Stes | Bate 2 S ee 9 ey fw hee ction | Le wef Opn tl aa : pet jor) oi ar yee he wee hte flo CBA weit; Cr, Os GT mere Hh Con lennet, A2cur : Get Chee Fon, Selon Piles porte ake Le 4 pre Corl we Hoe mAh Le or herr, Euahs Che apeeipo oy oud Fe LE en ney AL
. CO Ble Ae: Niner bos, 1963 on Fe ; ew a z HE VELA a xf Le . An G+ Fe A Hes Oe te gocwy " ! C966 tn = 10 196 5 aA o] EtLLO Bat
| hd AF A Ee . tebe $ eye, hy pe, | tom hate ial creo NW pperton sey a? tae ly
toed Ls, datas pet om “4a Se AG Ch chy i foo an 27 Me oe a won a a eh oo FAL 26>, : hhh en 5 ¢ Chviece ae ao - MEL a 23-24 - 25-27, a Sen Mrtemty *46 >.) Cite ae TACK IMS? asutit Crrtot em La, nteedoe lh, inte Cbs om At ane. tek pot RG of bs
AAyer ) apm AL TREO eta “ ‘ he A ton One tpn to Aetna 6) Pay "2" ee 6
a made etl te Annee mite betes wn sucleed ef Ue ai (799 wed $500. far 4 be
21 Newerrtee 1963. (ou reat) 23 Npytinbr P63. ers” pee IAM DSA 10. Ci Kop tub jy * sence stukim~ 4 oa GER Z2 14U3 Gere: Oei2e 2 tree ip. Mevico secon eta 7027 Cin- 67185) , NAH 1453 Zoe wtnru- | ae ih. Miyico StnGn. + Jous (Tu. Gwe , 2% cae 20 134-2 tem ake 23 (in— (232 , 23 a 1753 , CEC & ted) ctemanee ncn tes feos
. d - « 4 . . *) rey > ‘ ee : ae OO aod + 4aP ! at a F fr? 3/ “2 J escce ' cod us A re" PEA pet 1493 4 hee ( Ta- 65%) wee} Dh - eePe Ant PAF oe , 23 Vir 363 | ftyos ook _ Zo¥3 2 fred : 23 Wr 1563 0963 f6°S5 2 Frwy. C pew breve ten? @ e ad 4 a 3 3. Le, Clagerne 6 Myce Bt , bc- Feast) | 23 MN-1K3 , 17:242 foo « rp oacg) | Bode pe GER Rg Be - “ste.
17. Buyer Sting 163 (Loi 69255) ; Z3Mrv-=563 5 22TH 2 fea , « & a . e e @ * & ry g e . « . a ¢ ° a tga etee 7 Sapte ae
[f. Mernruian, Trlhtuemt. ho Cou a. Shtinn , Meier y VAS 196 Y. SA wef Vice? AgenTh. CU MAN 23 28G yt pn 1369) - . 5 ta So fo Hitt ese, 7 tA CE 2 2 eee ee ae ee Eee Dy: FAS 5 oon fal OES yaks, 7 ~ “os : - Fae Se So ‘joey
3/— Fx, Meyree fate fit ET ws. feo = con 196? pelle CO pete 2 a5, hedly Miputy Musip iabtets eT. ore tak SERRE were - 2-97. 2 4b 7 afpitlactts by buctnstt D Odum » Soo kL. MActey rot Ki chard. felon. Mewrmge VXI 0g HET. LINCLASSI FIED 7 9§, Rpert Gans vA Oplttn nlite ve Xd GF). UNCLASSIFIED
Copol, goy~ BOF -S eat 667 | y es, il Fey perdi gene Fe ha Weeks FIED of y en, we. A fen O evtiwanT, Dro Q- lan 6 Cb bent Cranrsl., 7 A Mrnetre fH Mapu Ba TF fact 7 Boo EES ral Nb ta 1967, 2 pegs. UNCLASSIFIED. . ¢, 17 14 Io, Ud Lleeet eee AS eer” ear ee “eke we ieep FE En gem
3, Cotecpredenee MG ty foe b, MECH Lo Aand (9M prtenten 1971 pond | y) . OO WCLAS- BY punt 1¢ fae [G71  FLtO3 AS SIF IED a [tpt oe ees) 3, {47% sg -I3 19 V2 , 7 7472 jp Ua 27 Jum IDR aho (CG. geet 1) hang eend 97% f erect _ em 7 patiteent,
( i on. my Routed me > ? one hy Fhe eee in Ke, a ony ty ace The aiterteale, “on ete. pS th Ayton Megeted t] Mee Hansard hay aes Cn | : de. aelel Hrthrtee | NAT Arr cerer , Pex = rae, ey
Fi * frml, 7, , ‘Foie : ot an % (ein ple fe ot alg Lorie A> é V Le oie
6. OS Hes, wel Ct be, Ar nel tamccnsent, oe bo. , eeenyet af eal Sergi ft Aeeag lary bey vim, Cyr ewe, areal Aopen Athen Zak to On “pi Afamn A ~ ses MORE nLgvin hebcta~ Mor he An Sauty , Lp 0F ae te (re Heng a«—~, 9 Neu breinsilee, - V actor deat sont) bem ee,
Bb 4 ital? GALS ae bat lo. 4 a“ -. et ame ye TE weir fon
coal Lif VAN eye Ueda mead LT. fede ett wb. ptt 9 (ple 6p, Uh HARKER ey vegeta t ot Ti ee wm Marley | SoT Dy pty oe pat 4 th Rechte om Ct. Saye US. Lead eS Aye Rhee oa
Ne tee BG emer 0 i Cetvrclag fhe Jd Ltt EMA EL ol 20'-20° Guntely Af hecuddg i — ney be”. KipehXOd mi Snag | @ Nun & nw ete “i = pila wee Pe Seeh pk. aebstentT ystrtpe. ty who wo anlage _ pins carn wits | | @ “xc Alt, Cue 4 pe say
14-00000 oe) ti Luu aad BT me etnel bor Lee | Ogres uk at rh, tv trbrweny Cowel , PrGcec- Lak ih Conte, hell pee atin @ be whence ff om ett “4 ret trian “they OOo ae Fuwre.? prvee Drees ot a Prsvyt veeaee Ae a ~# - at of Poy \ Lvlayge ae oe tS Oke gf : a ° . os ° “ ‘, 4 an o . 4 o? i a, fea * ® ¢ s pm a fo, at es sada. ees ao Peres fe = a wo par & See . - ‘ : : tp eg oO Re ve Fopee Totes, twee OS fe vue ; talon . i, poe se ee ry 4 Set Aree td on a 4 lon rbey , ~~” - aot f: a ee . a samen AA spt { vet a a ¢ By ° ae a artean” ff p-Ce-~ elend (Ope i fry J OF st. ‘we, Aaa. « fry ecto - a et C | en ee Ao ~ ee ee Ref E>. ae Le te ot 3S : : oe eth ~ _ 3 Pd a @ (erie > fe Like les ctl Co pgZETaa phd
/_ , ° “e . 0 © sear Ce 7 al id ‘ ¢ . ed . f Lao nd ft AC te aw nk ef Ce ote Le rice. Arwt-@ x é é,) 4 ra Z f tL. ato £ SRo ro Fuse ee - fs é 4 . w? PA ty hgh oh Seve. ke oe? . f qtr sa, etl Aye £604. ne lee “od ‘go ae Wl fon he" - WA Marving Gre. Ohad ARorrk- bho A Ma Lo Luts 9° ; a fe Ce hr Fons at nly ane Gil i berry Vee = rent plow qe ley” Pt thew O tereanct Benet (En: Le? tere a Lavell fy 2 ZG, Lovhon ven, FR a + lotimepy eer (Soe ate . _ cated fecrr Lo ae Davy be Peery OS pre anckeg' att, £01 teewadionee pobrwatl (AG tiene Khon Bibaitpeg L efron po wteaf $G CI eve1e bows Oorreng lip Jrmeamew YE 3,
_f * . “ff . 4: @ 9 ’ . . epie me Pt Ni Sb G, Arete oe 2- 8, é e ry (fee fideecl Ay a Lee , Ae vraaan were ete Sy wel. ey £ ei, lee gts cues, cee: owe_ces, ie Sie ‘a & a - 6 LOraes- ugh oe ae JIL A- Lo, a?’ a Je teced Lowel tls C6 Sm oe Beg Ufrekne, - 37 Bee ip ee bene © i ‘ ; i
5 ar) -° . v : EP yo be F SE een, , i a a a co, 7 7 a a. las Ar peed nee os woe LA L. Ine ae Lely "TEN. y owt soe ad - 7), / FZ Pp, Gf Pavey , DM born PeeCADY re ons As ; ~ . aed fhe - {fi eee jel, “ ge eel Oty fleowec eo “nz ep ze nen Y CUS Seer, smal ¢ CO ll fl Mira, 4 apts, 6 org Mrrrai Cope 2 Aint ts) 7 -  £ kigtnd Co eet tts aes Li ford of Bee SP eu” OTP, The Merres. ees GES Whew, Ke ZL Mer as Jroek, cael A A Agloon tc ame a Ch, ert, y Nhat. Ea wt Ul af fe. ” Ae Via Ae. / Mf bo Felawes ,” - ao ok lat Le d artilin om Ae pe nn AL, win Rox ceed
.e ; . oo & : ” « fe . 7 ted te be Auis , [Ao ce i tua Fe my ee y 1 * . . a ,: s . 2 . ! ; 7 ta PAS Peete eee oo oH ete CO But o So aFe * ° i . ~ . fo . - VEE a pov” hk alhef “a OE one we tee Lot 6 “ a va v4 : ¢ Al Lees KO Ste, q mes * “alte ét onda fa Lo Loi etry Li Peel a, or _, wo leneion én Se. ees oi ances an noo go wer kayo a PPT well Pood. "Ce Lal Pre, mee + 2fh, KAS pie cents Aeiteg. Aw LL freer wpgtln, : XT pee Oe a Ax Lacgit 5s AL a Aiea tle: Pu GED JQ Lia ae pele ee Are Later fe te wt, VieLaotet ton ia ich, of ey , Yen we laa Ty CB Y a1 kot, heD er Got! aepine lew A faced aie te ear ee® a4 3k ee Sn
14-00000 ae * ; . e *y @ _ ee v LZ. . . oo veces ry a me” - ‘my e GY bf ae ~ A Sees aw: ~y VA 3 a - we OE Pwo thy omen Gameine f ’ * v7 4 se rt rn Goole y tren on Lar ernie Lif, aw if feel ow hehe ak / Boiseed wow fay ek: “ it, hak far. “eet _o Lo LT ‘ « hy z m ’ ra Thee, ad A “| V4 4 nan see o Le ar, nr / i fe." 7 oeeet.! wt LE Lt ome Lammy . le & oe y up © oak tos Cone . Z L kG Sete tet cee 4 CZ. oad Korma, cae eel i sefel. F End worn, rb Ween, a) ee ee A eee te. Tw fp rleanss iss wi ee, ttre, vte Cewe of reste” ft Lea ean Meine see ae a Ca etal, yaa “7s es, oS mire re Loch & 1 eps = 2 Sf ie, a pany lise aa rete Mery yc eee Wa g . eae cewek “<. LG» POSES | . anaiiiaes: . Clece geo ) flo Fd Phe Cotes Serre ne f Pan, few (Pon * « eheerel
4) f 4 a 5 " 4 Lone, pots oO, fra MOR te , eh yt a . ot we ehe , foal Qos aaron ete ndege Z fi : we TE “4 / iG 4 . 7. ft by he. “, « bt J Frvt 6 wat ye hls (errs stor, ny) ave ee “ley “s an Lhaw ZG aa od ORvebhes c86 the vate Col, 4 fre ty Celene SP teak ile ? “My Libigurls ben / hs-< oD lore 5 ents ‘ext re, cle raffles Apreen. KE Alle. hen. wise Came ~ e., len, Le a Mijn 273%, Hehe weg, tte Fiore fienT torre fre at, et peel ie, neue ha LES inter open Me my BeES “Mle a Je i, 26 wf are fo ote, helt “de dk ; in ? Wo . . ford Lol Ely ee pe wy, mae bay "La. wr os . aa eiges lbcnnd of £G Tibia a - Mares Lea trod “Ly ff, aud , Mere, thet om ok OC ee LG [Vee A 5rs, pen. tyr Me hicteley « fled ee oon led Ges ery. Wr, Alena? See coe aia ad nn eon Y swt aroma «+ PF seartagae f {
14-00000 ee a . . ° se, a £ sft ete! nes, ated ee ’ ar . o * ae tee LE QA ’ fe tr we - + oA “y.. ovine? wv: Ce iD 2 ats oe or are en ereetiy aGer, . « of-. o ’ hw? Fete a oer ee a & doewe’ * gees fo rte. G - vow! ha ? ° ° 7k Te é “a _# / : “ f— = 1% ads ork on pe, Cres, a, Le Looe brett cr nees oe oo wy < aagd - GD Eo rec Le ae 7 & few bie grs & aa ie eaeeu “ =: ” — : <— Lneee oat of w Copa tae “OS £E? Os €2. OT dane onTI Cote oy ped ou Sipe he oe eel Ce a _ / / *- Merenth, Cetg > Gon. ai Chen 27 Lt 439 le were ie aren a US pe eye” f/f e 46+! reneanan —<_— ; hha ng irae ben oral bowen” App besa ho Soh C © £6 rintdin Sime h ie Lrk sr oli Vi flath BY, frweyl “ ent Wame eG Ca “wots a bs: Aart 6. x Seu M68 hb etne v fre Base lasye ii XM, Myrirt, . “4 / fed C498 lot Atecdnwid fu, Hof om 4, hemes Oo 5. mow Leet shy RAN tg 7 “855 \ dle Cte Kigig/ ce nee? + Loan Lew a | Puvlh—y oS (Pehl bis?, @ : * ‘
» ae Pans Lee Bete un i vaste vere rf. e ar, é 4 Y ade, preeal Sidhe Sieh ed Adee Bsea tne Ae ee . od . LG . .& Oe \ thee, as oe ta. tye ct, eed de fea ey lo were at 1 eee ae ae ce Fee ihe ew. if, wt. mo pew o7 ore of set M ae 4 _ a ~ e . ae tw Heong a * ganas tig 4 afé re ey eg ener a ee ). =< é tony yy 4 ra ae ey —— ° / ’ fer wel wer hobo ste eden leg a. thot,” a van we Cry a ov Lhe frictoe rt heb eX pwe pire Fawn 6 ae b> 7 eke yp ie merk y / Leven) “ey, _— ef the vas Gy tte ee Pars “sy Luo Z Ryle , pee é ° * - wffy / . . ’ ope . Te pe 3 APD Mares - eee —- ‘ We 0 © Pete ae : eee en jor ~ US ~ Cohnre A o Fgh ots Arma ote whee lhc, sf (ntr .n ete om 3 ome (968,
14-00000 . c : , e 6 f . ew ~ so 2 “a. Cope, oa 4 n. id Cees ‘ws *. dele, &?, a Fae. ee Lee Le e — ome me , f ve 2, tre Pe fev ectelee’ Je Var P ey if pawme anes by A Hp Geek “org oP: CL ite" LS tivf bs An a > fae Cel ots , Moree SIVIEL- oo 4 . 4 ? GTe we A  phorens G ves f ae 6 Bhe errearl a, LES, oes Li porzurDiretor , fer © Be eer oo gen “ap § Lee a 4s me E, aaeid begs eit flor hon er Meret nee 4 ail , eg
14-00000 . i a . - , + gt 4 cad . a aA . lB ae etl, fw ee be eee tee nied ered “ye, . af as “ \ ¢ 4, Le . a ; . + > ost a “Af e - SL, rt . one o. 2A <n rote OE he eine fF. tee hate b ey 4 ve . ° * . . _ ° . id ? - . Three | | y “ = ye a } j i 7 = yacht
o . oe 0 9 nate a of. ob be i . ae foe Ubi f Jace Jon ey . e a “ fe ke Pay. te 4 ae ee Fe 8 “ Jteeee 7 He: et sey MX ca fa)” FE , oa of “2 * weil, CC, Coy CME Heep weclLreprd iin, s %, e oor Oo, ET wel Bonyyter emu, Belin a her epeego Ene” Vln ~ ee Baim” a a, a L/h “, Fae tet mi” a co ee eS fae * enter > (AA 4b. oa (Lae LF wee pres © vue - 7 Dow AEP we laeg vente jgprlal oa aa AS £ reventiee he bier pel vy Mets E Con ans aiaé
14-00000 4 aaa ’ Sf ot ’ e ws ate oy 7" eee ad ory, LAG oe Beer” 4a es theese & mere * Gee AE LL ren 2 ty Surges, a: ct eg rGets ae a ta tells Cn : Ae? La RTE ea earn ee re ne
. ’ of . eo: of an . A a a id ia ee HHO. or) e & yo? mo Oe 3 oe weet S a . e * . . -— oe . . ad é w & wanton AL ie fed * eA se v4 ey fyprsrte  ¢ ad - , ou e *, . o fb ra , 4 ; er aid Cuthen OU ote 6 8 ‘ » € pete ch = a ee Che; atc rites SFIS Re aht> a Fhe ai ae A NS _ “2 ay - (tng ca Lek FO. ate a Bie. wae Z =~ w & . . wy, Sa awe ett, Ge oa fe te 6 se fem eer 3 pall * ~ eee: of, en Pe . ne & [a ae: tf dr syc te thecal worn «6 “eR coe as. ON jl yf vred Bt haw old “% Mite Wi (he bel - ra ae £763, me. tubes heed 4 Ace ot UG ? are Awe a © waite cal “/ . pn SIS Y ; (OC LABE: s Jaceenend) wins Lee, Pages’ t Ee f eteq . woe (fox (y Bz Seiteew ob ee Ay . bd Etern. peter te” 2, = 74 roe 5 Cree eS AT “wr Ee egg, Fo . = ? ; o ie Cpa: SFee ttn, —— ewe on "2 a be cee Sy nef ateatis oe rox fat, “Y “ ate SRA, UU pert ke i nw 7 ite fhe bs + Tle likes hy 0 ck - ro oe 7. Frew ch oy —_— woe eek ott PP oe an ile L pisten’ ie eae “, oa own oa — . « f ie . xo ag A co enw tle FG 8 OT ne hiss, LE ae, oF 3 2. ge (i er? i - wien OA betel Eon . eee eras
14-00000 o , ae . . . a a ae be we ee we het A i. rns ‘ sce ae - ae : re 7 - } i . ‘ Fee rt “ 7 ae a o Fn ff oth .* tg Kae ® +S oat aoe S te . os . . : a eo of ? AE f ‘ atte Gy , . te ‘ : we ¢ atl id -* . OO. OS, oe OD es ch a ae aero zoe ar A ” . e ‘ - ~ 3 , ff w > fer hee, Ata _ cath on Boe « Fes br te one Chty cnt eg c Lye tS: pee ae Co Spat Cae ert Ts pez A focie [iin find he 44 Pe ee ater ‘ ox ; AEM ER. 3 “pen on ee Awe Srasge A facet elo lon ef be carat Ep a ieee Pine lass aan of ne eae, Zit & “ Comers lone Sentra » *, foc eee if ~- Ez, plas ail “A ae P LIAS « 227 a )teets asamp ames . “¢ parr WORE ey ~ we eee ieee oe ot en aa of AL Afi Has, we to, fe Ie Read) oo Dhan ‘ Se 2, gpyanr ihe beet a ae ae oa a ty : Tpke tots M wes een ES wth pe aod " Aatinced Les Af Jae, UY .r DR oe ie BA Aerpod a th, Lowes, 8 A ie a Whe buy
pif bit be tS Lae r . yor ey é * e ’ a 2 f : , _. ir hg | ‘ ep thet - thee, ae c. 7% and Mp Le iret cf AG os a “ . _ . Drees to oR Lt Mh eto ooh 3% 4a o* 3 : f- ’ ae: “- ae “ee tha SUI SSA bEM # . . a tpn - o @ ¢ ~ oo “s + 2 Sutras of et rice meee aCe 2 thee ots te ole e ° Cd 4 oe ot Be, ea Ses = . wee Lots <= firt ror" a neyo Saeed tree ter 8S Kee &° ree oe & LHe Fe ceez ge 1% wo & Lew CL Veet oe
14-00000 “ a “8 . red a feat se feb fens go . y vy we , “4S ip & Yee Sb ae CATE YF > beclve fad a ae ~fe¢ otis Lee oon e § fa Tg ° ° ~ otf Ce . /. 4 - sehcagh of fue tehlag, . Otte MO etP ae tee, rr ake i eS wires , 4. . / ‘ “~ od : 7, Fe Bo AAW yp ot Cul EOF 6 Maree ane ghagy peer we s — , - aie «- coor nanan SER re ram ory Pea A ot Le Ad cPEVe fii, ee Ate [ibid mn * ~ « . , !, ff _ £ a o peed! ey Lh tra, Ve Geo / aGeade iter? / . (ewe feos J : , eae , get au fees n 3 wlute ef f a wy, a . 7 teed. \ Vet ve Ja iA: fe Teen ety Shhtag eae a: r , “Ww Ay herent bos § Fale Ly Lb ney’ ty . vedi ue dé 4% 6 cy Cn oy “nt 7 “s WS den &, woe neey: toe AL ee \ trahen Th, Wil ye. Spe Se 6 Oe ay Lusces Onde “ an | Ae ae mane air FR. a . Gere. ar aed eheced gh Bes cake os ib eg arena
. / - e . f Fa . . . é Lh ee of ee ee s ff bee y’ Se MTL ween we te Ot fae A . */ a / A “ee EL pM ae oo Ar Cc [eer or ad. . . ane aos ba tLe an ae ee, ro) fe, vr; \ . Pos : . -?f ar of oes, / oo suze Stele tel - log Aug. ty, & wt 5 f. Lh, based - jones ‘ ~—ecm ; ) . dfs. 4 - - . “4 frm - ved, ane Lot Pots gkenghtel 6 én Yon it Sone I, We wer
14-00000 . a “ 4% - * cal . > “ ° “ . ftost Ca , ees fH ae fobs fy eee 4 - oh ey rr rar ae * - 4 . - eon w “* ‘? Lek an Pee 4 \ ©'S fares .¢ et Jaese, eee, wy ot oe . € . ’ wiry 7 ¥ 7 e . Clee’ # ra _ ee wr “ ~— d - “ff *f ¢ ‘ e ° ¢ . 4 ‘an rf & 4 : IN oar? 8 : { ¢ ~ # wie oO, cay aka if = “ tartar & “4% 7 a . Attn . i a ~# ar & Ca ditetes hale 4 yO ow Fig PARP ea eee gat tate Kiwis nue. citee adie! . ra ; — | - ° * ) Js ~d4. Ae : be S gt Crew wn Fl SR A we et Ai ‘ (dtncld a . ~ A . 44 wd heron ond -3 gp tee Petre & Ltt, - tae 2C- whe. 94 y ihe be > oy, Cue. a a pe. é Lt ‘ Curd y/ Cnr Dg at An. ay ee é ’ 4 é Perr re saan Tre ttt-¢a wer Ah ete . é yt r ; . Lf eft -srbn, healt wets \ ute! Castine, . f -.- ays * a “ iran anid POOL ay ot? een feo Oe bee F f ) : ; eo . \ Ws Shera. rotten wth eter ae oer, { 4 a -~ | / -f- an “Rpt ob pps eee ' : + Aantoeren ee Lees re Pe . l6
o ad 4 : . a4 oe , ~~ ai tet A er ht 2g. Mm ot ofr. te pe fo ss @ Ts Pa Aroer pte gant Ce wets pi hg oe gk fab ee fa are esr fgets on. a LA ‘ -. oe ao v ~f ” cv pet Pome ends wt toma ., ° fC : ‘ber; Auge a ww. oC. . / oe ‘ x bares! rae ale PON keg Ae fp. oR: ate . Mite Ht Sie Gis baw hon Pat linkety, Lat CH ike 4, tepicet te of trl te por ae ae iva Ye, bn Porat oon (afl ots vend, & Fon f _. . wf . of ; , part the! hee, pore ” ad fi. Jaws ra ‘ or ee °. . ? . . ° oe - - lay Seta’ ROR“ StuL- pyle tye. Pelt, ene SO , hed a / 7] op bee ae Ley ” —f, =< é e ae fie DE | Tere fe i ode 2) ee | ; yim wea a 4 ee ae j - yaa rr weah Avera
“4 - « a. ‘ é .- if im e «eae f 4 ‘ my ‘ . ae . < ¥ . > . 2. of 6 . o% atece . ¢ 5} “ wee tye es és+ ates t aglaw ‘ ee: 6 be Seen geese Lb wee wm tg ‘so Tra pe ad et @ - gat fa “¢ #6 ad . wae & ~ “ f, ‘ ltr 4 “a s? o mF wee iad . oO . a4 s FO psa Fosse ot yee. & beet poe 2 7 6 fee et ete gg la . ee aE nen ‘ a) -f~ : Pee Ue tayer- a, ee pase . a Comken aes woe eal? ‘ 8 LOU oF Me nee, Gravalel, 2see’ “e3 wt ate — a“ SS 7 ae - , a, . v4 Ss ota heres rad 7 Hv 5 LF - : ia —_ ecm sisi = te af é A t 9° . A , - aw. a ae ~ Afi : i - ae melee hee tel Oe CL, \ Kane” SDM pe Noe 1 tA. real, phi Ee Sige s * *y . * J bce ey’ on oe, ee of Cre EC ® . ww oleae te a ee ne a of os pow tag fy CYA Aare Aw °° 1 ep rg od te: ’, « thee wv, y ‘ ti es dae. oy ws mane: * ,. ia Bev Steep ttn May Bowen £ “tren lee
14-00000 , of ¢ o & d{ é r) , , 4 o ¢ . 2 , . fois - . 4 bee i a ? ° Oa cn gels “odes 2 ey Sa Oo ce ee Ge SL ps | operpc apa, $ ae aie es s ~ > > c . » oe oat Bif Any Pes tte ee Ee wae Lu Cae? i , Gide’ we “hae % Seems ato ay $ pp ‘ . Le OE hel ene « ¢ . “ : y f wate = ° ‘e ad a a ara PAC CKoee 4 & f a ow ad Gore of prulg ft Creo? ft. oe aspects vh.: RI ACA ACs gue ots Aven LT” Ae ae ~ ¢ ‘ fe; “e ey ’ | Noe ver G @ot eb it y eee. wmhaT” ¥ e ANCA i Lapse) . ™ weeny re Laok. @ 4 e eee as y be seiaeaty ; & wos of f ey a a p- i gis ’ f é ’ fe ores tog gy BER nae Te st4y vt Pik bets 4 wes i > é yn + 4 - fen SOD oh bee OG: ae Se wetweho yt sg, Aj ac,
14-00000 PY 3 ign ma : eee. mE pak $ Dota dda dad Ge r ! SUSPECT: The Phéte of an Unidentified Individsal ba the w Warten ¢& | } | j en ‘ Chronole: ,; : REFERENCE: Memorandum by David W. Belin to Mr. E. Harry Knoche, 5 15 April 1975 (Attachment A) . i : '  . de Reference momorandum suggests it would be appropriate. » _ to reconsider full disclesure at thig time of the circumstances. .-- on and factual data relative to the. Sub fects che purpose ‘of this : = ma . coe 7 survey is to permit a realistic. evaliation of the siiggest ion: 1 : ~ : le fe or, p _ 2. Background. This examination and summary of the record'’ i. Goncérns a cropped photograph considered by the President's Comintission on the Assas si ination of President Kennedy (hereinafter rants fo cited as the Warren Commission) and introduced into evidence as Odum Exhibit No. 1,? rhe photograph (together, «obit te : pse>rn, with others of the same individual) originated from a pety~ eels sprintert erstit®highly sensitive qoperation being comlucted in ‘October 1963 by the cra jsainse the Soviet and Cuban Embassies in Mexico City. whe ames rhe 3. Under the peebeve® the extracedinary effortg# to develop information on the as Sin and the essassination, copies of the 1 See Hearings Before the Presicens*s Commission on the Assassina~ ‘tion of President Kennecy (hereinarter cited as Hearings page 6
14-00000 at Myth 4 a ge weber See er anes bates Soe maT OA FU det w etsiee eC eT ENS Bete eet et pRAFKT phetegraph wore Inada available by CIA's Mexico Station Chicf on yrresentative, and: the afternoon of 22 Noyembyt to Be lo ey FBILer later that day of the anbassador, copies were - oe ¢ feos . conveyed by. Cae EDT - arena the’ Dallas cee a : possible use a Vn. 9 FB) ee i mr, -in, the. iigotng investigation.’ oma-photosramngl cas shown to a * . . . . . . . t, * ‘son. (A further complication leading to this conclusion hed=kuors. ca : “glk wwehin, x AN Coe oe - — . 7 4 Mrs. Marguerite Osaka, iin t Dallas on, ‘the evening « of 23 “November 1963" . : wae ‘ . oe soa ra by FBI Agent -DaAidwell' Db. ODUM’ , a Ds a . oy 4.. The ‘Warren Commission's Report describes the sequerica of nn os. events at pp.364-365 and’ 667 “(Attachment’ 5) which, ultimately ~ “resulted in'Mrs. Marguerite OSWALD'S allegation that she had been | shown'“a -cropped-photo- of. Jack~ RUBY. the.day.-before he. murdered’ her | 1 _the fact that when she had been shown a copy of the same photo- graph in her appearance before the Commission, it had been cropped bs oak dpe oe by the FBI it a slightly different manner. a §. No detai lf in the Warren Commission report illustrates more vividly than this one the difficulties that beset simple truth in the politicized, rigidly aetermingd“ccorpretive climate that has been nurtured by the media over the past decade} The
14-00000 re > op ct, tor lve so) t6a, centerpiece - AR Ler ee-ON tanetic that. holds OSWALD to | have béen “framed" by the use of a double in’his activity in Mexico City.’ aot . ; . co Lod w stay ‘ ' woot 6+ Bee Harvey. OSWALD > Réporting (Me Although goF an rio way related to Lee. Harvey OSWALD or his stay in Mexico city _from. tlie | worning of. a7 Mey 1963. to the ‘morning. of 2 Oetober ee - ch Che e photograph a ve e Mexico > City Station to : 7 devlew thertreeeett what’ ‘the Station ascertained ‘and did with ce : : : 7 information at developéd about OSWALD in unico city, eogether a ; with ieadquarters ction on the infornation, PERO ARSE 7. ‘From all- “credibipovidence known to this time (none, incidentally, added sirice the. exhaustively ‘ianique work of the Warren Commission), Lee Harvey OSWALD spent 4 full days and . . 2 partial days--about 116 hours in all--in Mexico City from about 10:00 a.m. 27 September 1963 to about 8:90 a.m. 2 October i : 1963. His pbk of residence was a small commercial traveler i hotel, not frequented by '"“gringos"--the Hotel. Comme rtee ‘ : me wee yee fe or, 2 This is the thrust of the article "The CIA and the Man Who Was Not Oswald" by. Bernard Fensterwald and George O'Toole in the, New York Review of Books, a copy of which is attached to reference {Attachment A).
a vee} OR ALF td where he was registered under alias. Exhaustive and de interviews tailed and interrogation by the Mexican authorities and the aftr Ki trowkse nln y) A 8. Nssuming, and allowing for the fact, of late arrival and . . (3s of, 39 hours), there remain some: 78 ‘hours of activity to be accounted for: OvetaL; Jrtateteeaswe Er é account solely rege FBI established that in the recollection o€ all hotel personnel he left-early and returned late each day of his. stay. All coverage by CIA. \. during. ‘the entire period was technical. - The /Station had no live source (Living. agent) coverage either 7 “ ST herb be rete] Laa> or from (WALD oa was in no sense "under investi-- gation." None of . the facts of his defection ‘and stay in the USSR _ and. return a(guring a 28 September and 1 october: wn Avr b - to the-UvS., 1959 = 1962, were Sepnecerodtrticxico Station files before 10 October. 1963, when the ipternet.anw lias ae attic ‘forwarded by Headquarters in response to rnd Station ,report of a October forward #e4, on a routine basis, what wak roomier be an at) a, American| contact for a visa to Cuba in transit to the USSR. wa. [teow A indicated and deduced from technically acquired information on Leonel. 1 October, which was the first and only occasion in which Bs wnt identified a fs himself by true name. fat no time during his stay in Mexico City did the CIA bebutt} eaquire a photo, of PA ne
nearer oo A F coo gies A Careful review of all coveraqe, voice intercept, as. well as photographic, of both the Soviet and Cuban Embassies was male Cr hnsde "22 and 23 November 1963 after the assagsina~ s by the Station on. tion, going -back to materials. from mid-year. It is, therefore, ar _ firm that there was “ho CIA photo covérage. of OSWALD at any ‘time during ‘his Mexico tri sey An textco, Chey. Moreover, despite. x AT haf ~ j a4 ee on 1S: October, the Mexico Station had ‘no hioto of by “ OSWALD in its records, nor did ft ceceive one’ fren’ Headquarters “_., _ , before 22 November 1963. : insole - . ~ 20.- s eweef by , the. smonitor, « on the : - ms . uae - ; aie eS ° ‘ ne : a ‘ SEE ise - ° . . 2m a . r oe basis of the 1 od tober intercept-=which. had been reported to , i : ~ Readquarters aiid disseminated”-to-the interested.members.of the... ce 2 . | intelligence community (as. an ex-Maririe, OSWALD was a Navy and FBI . Fi case under the delimitations, and potentially of interest. to the Department of State)--tumed up matches based on content, a “shrrouneed identity with ‘materials Ze on 27 and 28 an - Tle mene, Mare yen lig Ae bre LOR 23 a , (76s, poe . September 1963. 2; Gceci Based on voice comparison fexeeP yu at , - 4 Saree could be recalled by the monitor--and this was not irisignificant Mop] A . sy because of the varyeelyCpoor Russian spoke by OSWALD) could not be made because the tapes, in accordance with the normal practice, 1 7 aS had been erased and re-used x} Lo .
“feo MPA AY toactpet ely Bee ee et Male Re wees ‘logs. Full texts of selected Leong.sca it roquive-Gonsultation | meat hee) fe re ot ‘shew ldsbe Baked thay” voice intercept and p hotodraphic | coverage was now, processed in “real time.” The natureefjicquisi- tion arid the votune of the information prec luded anything but ‘the | ; a he a “spot reporting of items “judged by the monitor GF more—than = . interest and, ‘therefore, ‘noted in summary ordinary “Of the: tape ‘and either a full trahséription of’ full translation | “t | or both. Photo" coverage tended to becomé’ available in quantity Lota which required scanning and selection on a. rapid and ; co . a (soo a Reece so ae ‘accel I6ratea basis One of the “triggers” that normally operated , oo mere « apreeety / to focus and a accetinate Herapt eater and “reporting. of this kind | raw. intelligence wh Che weition of, name . this ae was precisely what: occurred in ‘the second of two conversations ; Paes Non October cieh" the. Save’ apaesy Seiad im ald Oy ; he was “Lee OSWALD," mA | was this information reported by the wid cGy hrelibiediinkre Pre Cheer. Station to Headquarters] on 8 October 1963. § Telok 13. The Mexico City Station did one more thing in its report . . ; “A on Lee OSWALD based on its 1 October voice intercepts: it coupled thie data with descriptive information it had acquired from a i (o1tateral/ sensitive jsource--a photograph of a male individual, | apparently an American, who was observed entering the Soviet =~ ; Embassy on 1 October. The Station reported these detailg as a
14-00000 € a2 he 3 f N * 3 , way related to OSWALD. BRANT : pat as a wets ‘ “a ‘ (coincident segam,. .Tho Station did not assert or suggest that the 4! 4 : , . aa ‘data prodvreed Leos the photo was in fact OSWALD, or. indeed, jin any ; rd. Lee Harvey OSWALD - CIA Coverage of His Mexico Gity Stay. “One additional element of .background must be stipulated now as ‘the final precondition to understanding the relevance (e= irretevancd) of: + “the photo of the unknown individualf’ placed in-the chain of : evidence .on 23 November in Dallas by FBI Agent. B&@dwell ODUM: oO _ 2 what was the totality of .cIA Mr@rtept-coverage of OSWALD's 2 Be activity as of thé afterhoon of the [aid Adana 23rd when all available aan ; coverage had been recheefeid?. : ; , an 0 ; a — 14." The” totality ‘of Mexico City Station’ coverage On; oF 7 ; F a co ess reasonably inferable to be OSWALD, consisted of five (5) voice * ; , “Sintercepts as follows: : a. 27 September 1963 (Friday), 1605’ Mexico City time. Silvia DURAN § fa acon elena tte Mexican national ~ Cuban Embassy, do(nsular section, a receptionist, speaks with an unknown male at the Soviet Embassy 3 Silvia DURAN tells the man that the American citizen was there, the one who wants a visa for Cuba on his way to the Soviet Union, and he wants to know with whom he was talking there because she (silvia) ° had sent hin to the Soviet Embassy saying that if
14-00000 QR AF T they accepted him and gave him a visa, then the Cubans (Embassr would’ also give him a visa without further paper work, only advising ranigeaticn in aa, wants to-know with" whom he “ee Begs ewes mrs) Bod ae moe had talked there because he says he was. told there would” be’. no ‘problem. The man in-the Soviet EmBassy says to wait a moment.’ or . “A different yaa speaks, and Silvia ¢xplains the same thing to... ‘ AS “I , oe him, “This nan says to leave, namé and’ telephone number: aria’ says a - . he will all back. silvia gives the telephone 11- 28- 47 (cuban _ : ae ; “consulate) . ettrid Giso takes | advantage of the conversation , . wed Ae . . . ~ “ : , , . . i _ and states she has moved and wants io advise the Soviet Enbiasay” wo co i of her change of address so that she can receive the pov ; Co eek i ‘eBulletin. The man says to call KOUKHARENKO == 9 5 0 2 u. z to give her néw address, then he asks the name of the Consul ‘or Cultural Attache. Silvia says the.name is Teresa PROENZA | “ Dy and the telephone number if 14-13-26. The man says thanks. ws b. -27 September 1963 (Friday), 1626 Mexico City time. ee . 0 ; ; a Srey a ae "An unidentified male calls the Cuban consulate, asks — silvia DURAN if the American had been there. Silvia DURAN * says he is there now. The Soviet says the American showed papers from the Consulate in Washington, that he wants to go to the Soviet Union and be there. for a long time with his wife, . * who is Russian, but the answer has not come from Washington in — . aha a) S ST Tt I IT A OTE EAE I et nna en rae a ne tenon ene tenn tn tere ennai
. , Oo: respect to this problem, and according to this procedure it takes four or five months, but without having permission from 7. | ra the Soviet Union they shou ld ask, or better said, they cannot _isgue'a visafhere without asking Washington. However, | ae ‘according to this. man, ht showed’ a letter indicating he was a. -* 4 _Member, of an organization in. favor of Cuba’_and that’ the Cubans ~ we said. that they cannot issue a visa without his having a visa” _.for! the Soviet Union; and, now ‘he (the Soviet). does now know ‘what to do with, him (the American), because they have to wait t for an answer from Washington. _ mo te, ‘Silvia DURAN: agrees’ the same problem. exists with the er Cubans, that the problem with him (the American) is that he does not know-anyone in Cuba and therefore if that is true it. 7 i will be difficult, for him to get a visa for Cuba, because he - Poe ee was thinking of processing his visa (for the soviet Union) ; because he knew ‘it would require.waiting a long time for his i visa to the Soviet Union while in Cuba, and from there go to the Soviet Union. The Soviet said the thing is that if his Sy wife right now were in Washington she would receive her visa right now, or permission, from the Soviet Union, to return to her country, she is going to receive her visa in, Washington but having this visa, she could communicate to any place this — : permission, for example here or any place she could receive it 9
14-00000 (visa or permission}, tartearight now they doa not have them, E enna at tnt A petit A OSE . ' a 4 Ube ( Silvia DURAN says certainly and they cannot . , : . , . . , , iE give a letter either because they do not Know if the visa will “ . . ae 7 SO, ' be approved.- The Séviet says ‘they onlyagiy visas according to e : indications. Silvia OURAN says then she will put that on the’ i. * - list. The Soviet says he canhot give letter. or recommenda=— a “. . tion either .because he does not know him (the American). and ! asks to be excused for bothering her. Silvia DURAN says that - i; is all right and. many thanks, . . ee, 28 September 1963.. (Saturday) , L151 Mexico City time. ~ “ ° Silvia DURAN calls the USSR Embassy and/ to an unidentified : ce ey . x Soviet i@ays that in the Cuban Embassy there. is a North. . . . an - ; aAmetican who was at. thé Soviet Embassy. The Soviet says wait | . ~ eee : ‘aminute. Silvia DURAN speaks English with someone--and . a ot i comments in Spanish that they gave APARICIO telephone 14-12-99 and to take the number down--Silvia DURAN then says the American - citizen is going to talk with you, i.e., the Soviet. The american first: speaks Russian and the Soviet speaks English. fhey continue in English. The American talks broken Russian . . - . . . and says I was in your Embassy and spoke to your consul. Just a aminute. A Soviet takes the phone and asks the American in English what does he want? The American says please speak 10
Aah een ntnertant nate ne ‘ , -DR AF T Russian. ‘The Soviet says what else do you want?) The American | says I was just now at yeur Tmbassy and. they took my address. The Sovict says T knew that. “the Mnetican, in hardly -recogntz= abie Russian, says Y did not know it then. I went to the | , Cuban Pabagay ‘to ask. then for my adtéss, because théy ‘have Lt. "the Soviet, says’ whi don't you come again and dave your, address with us, it is not far from the Cuban Embassy. The American. hee says tll be there ‘right away. de 1. October 1963 (Tucsday), 1031 Mexico City time. An unknown male’ (american) Bites) the Sovict Embassy » the “Military Attaché's number, 15-6991, and says. to an unidentified Soviet respondent: -I was at your: place last’ Saturday and talked : . . to your Consul. They said that they would send a telegram to Washington, and I wanted to ask you if there is anything new? The Soviet says I would like to ask you to call another phone number. Please write it down: 15-60-55, and ask for a consul. a Thank you. e. 1 October 1963 (Tuesday), 1045 Mexico City time. The same person whe phoned a day or sa ago and spoke in broken Russian speaks to OBYEDKOV (a Soviet Embassy-guard).-. He says: This is Lee OSWALD speaking. I was at your place last Saturday and spoke to.a consul, and they said that the would send a sae ey ll
7490000 y 3 “3 gdring-a’ stay oy 2 ROA F ements tea ecene B itelegram to Wag shingten, su Tt wanted to find out if you have eb .. . “anything new? But T don't retember the name of that consul. | t . 7 OBYEEROV -says? KOSTER. He is dark (hair or skin+?). OSKALD. Says yes, tay nase is OSWALD. OBYEDKOV says, just a ~ minute) 141 find. out. They: say that they have not ‘received - re ae . anything yet, ‘OSWALD says: Have they done anything? » OBYEDRKOV - eee al ae: . ao mos . . says: j¥es, they say “that a request has been sent out, but nothing has been réceived as yet. , OSWALD says, and what . 0. .? ;  OBYEDKOV hangs. up. ee . a . ne - - i. “al of" ‘el ese items, ine uding the ve 8 ef the: raw] ay _ 3 , ; a . " intercepts, wer  vead disc sof with, “and '¢ amined” by’ the/ Warren “fp i eo / : . . e ‘ f : s . wh. fe f wh be ~ A / oho / J & / / H ra : i ? ~ Neue ao a vA . : oy LL tos aor: 1968. 3 I Conniis'sion stafter pe Headguarters and” at the Mexigo city station ; UV (Metres dt
14-00000 POALE eal bEa EE ete te beens 3, The warren Commission group that visited the Mexicu City Station consisted of Mrs COLPMAN, Mr. SLAWSOU, ancl Mr. WILLENS. - They but others for ‘ examined net only the littercepts a through y above, the 27th and one for 3 October that MEE co have relevance. These have not been included in this summary because they appear, - I. j ‘on review, to be exc ludable from the OSWALD matter. on logical or’ ,| ! { 4 -gubstantive grounds, or both, bearing in mind that ‘the Soviet’ Embassy "Fate “received many -calls pertaini g to visa matters; On the 27th: at 1037 the embassy received a call from an | unknown Spee sf . ~Andividual ,vho ‘said he wanted visas to go to odéssa. He was :told: "the consul was not in’ and to call back at 1130. . OSWALD is ‘known to: = Roja bug terminal on bus #516 at have arrived ‘at: the F ca. 1000 on thie’ 27th... rt was, tliskefore, possible’ for him to. have - at made this Gall. Bin 0 this, it ghons unreasonable to believe. ‘the calls were OSWALD's for ‘the f dllowing reasons: a. the caller wanted visas, and: specifically for Odessa. OSWALD was sééking a visa and never in any pide, context dia he specify the Black- Sea port. of Odessa as a destination. i an b. the call was. directed to the correct Soviet consular we number: 15-60-55. on tna Ly october, OSWALD first called ee near the wrong number, 15-69-87 (the MA's number), and had. to Ca redirect his call/to the correct number, 15-60-55. .It seems | unlikely he would have made what would have been his initial - call, on Friday the 27th, to the correct number, and called 7 the incorrect number on l October. © c. There is every reason to believe from the context ‘of rnvte 1% the intercepts _a through e above, that OSWALD's first destina- - tion after arrival and check-in to his hotel, was a visit to the Cuban Embassy. d. The use of the Spanish language would exclude OSWALD og unless he made use of an intermediary, which seems unlikely J berGnat is known of his modus operandi. 1 (footnote)
three grounds: a . an a. The use of broken Spanish. OSWALD throughout used Gs a A broken Russian ‘or an be Aa He had no competance in spanish filet | On 3 October at 1539 an individual spéaking broken Spanish, then English, called the Soviet Embassy and asked for a visa. The Soviet respondent says: call on the other: phone. - The requestor & says: I'm looking’ for a visa to 94 to Russia. The- Soviet says: Please call on the telephone of the: consul, 15-60-55. The, requestor gays: One moment please, I'll ‘have | to get ‘a pencil to write ‘the number downs >, They issuo the visa there? The Soviet: That Aepends on your conversation. oy don' t know about this business. Please call the office of the: gonsud. and, ask. your. ‘question. The: requestor asks for the number again. The Sovict gives him the number and - ‘tails, him to" ‘ask’ for. the consul of ‘the Soviet! Embassy an Mexico, | The relevance of this intercept to OSWALD is excludable on i | oe Cprenatht sp Taco b. The Toecanes of che request indicates a visa request in ‘the first ‘stages of initiation. OSWALD had ‘developed his: Se mica . matter with ‘the”™ Cubans and the Soviets xe? a point well beyond ad wg chon Cif, Ze che Su Swince“ot-tntse L. c. “OSWALD had left Mexico city, based on all the credible evidence, the early morning of the previous day, and could | not have made ‘this local call. 2 (footnote)
i _as part of the continuous text.) DR ALE T, Each 16: yivined OF these items, including the texts of the raw ‘intercepts, were coay/ Hincussed with, and examined by Warren Commission staffers ‘in Headquarters and.at the Mexico City . Station during a stay from 8 to 13 April 1964.3 [footnote is “on a separate page, but should be inserted in the final. typing “14. sinning UP», we: can state, ‘or reasonably infer from ‘the , ce, evidence, " enat ‘csiiita ‘ede the’ following contacts with the Cuban and Soviet official establishments in Mexico City. a. .27 September 1963 (Priday). After arrival and check-in | _to hia hotel, OSWALD went first to the Cuban Fmbassy , where he talked with Mrs. Silvia DURAN. The time of his first Cuban Embassy visit is unknown. The time of his second Cuban Embassy visit was about 1600 (i.e:, just before closing). Sometime between the two Cuban Embassy visits, at Mrs. DURAN's indica- tion, he must have visited the Soviet Embassy. We have coverage only on the second Cuban Embassy visit. We have no indication who he, talked_ with at the Soviet Embassy . . There was no photographic coverage of OSWALD's entries into either the Cuban or Soviet Embassies on the 27th. The lack. of coverage on the Cuban installation is explainable: the camera, based on the recollection of officers still in service in Headquarters, was ll
14-00000 DR AP T ° down on the 27th because of ae chanical malfunetion, which was ; ‘ prrlrtcy in course of correction. Why OSWALD was missed in his entry to 4 Lo na 274 thie Seviet installation is net yet explained. . t ' an a - BO, 5 Co , “he -b. . 28 September 1963 (Saturday). [ note: Both/Cuban and uo , % . Soviet EmbaSsies were closed to the public on Saturdays. | ~ Photograghi¢ coverage was norma My stispénded saturdays and | oe - Sindays.] OsiALD, notwithstanding the holidayfchedule, went on Saturday morning to the Soviet Embassy (his second visit) oo where he spoke’ to a consul. He apparently could not recall his new Texas address. At ca. 151 he went to the Cuban Embassy--his third entry--where he had régisterea it in his vida applidatién ‘the “aay previousty:"“He ‘secured the address . as from Mrs.. DURAN and she called the Soviet Consulate presumably to permit him to give them the address over the phone. Instead, the Soviet with whom OSWALD spoke over Mrs. DURAN‘'s telephone invited OSKALD to come back in person, and he said he voulal (Sresumabiy QSWALD’ “thereupon went back to the Soviet installation (his third entry) «t-tive thei lbiscPekas<abdress c. 29 September 1963 (Sunday). No activity registered. ‘Gd. 30 September 1963 (Monday). No activity registered. pot (It is Known that OSWALD reserved space this date on a Mexico City-Loredo bus, departing 2 October 1963 at 0830.) . 12 .
14-00000 DRART e. Ll October 1963. (Tuesday). OSWALD made at least’ two calls, at 1041 and 1045, to the Soviet Embassy. He identified Himself twice during the se¢end call when he talxgd ‘with: i OBYEDIKOV=-a quard--and referred ‘to his talk on Saturday, a : probably” with KOSTIKOV. There was no mimeo to a ; Embassy . ‘id case.nea clearly been placed at «ihe « catterance 7 of the USSR Embassy in Washington, His two calls onl October a i = . were concerned with whether any reply had been received fron Washington. Under these circumstances vih-nibasighi. it is e : De ; unreasonable ' to believe OSWALD would have gone to the Soviet pO Embassy on ‘tha date. # oN 8 iB. The camera at about mid-day registered the entry into _ the Soviet Embassy of an white-shirted individual whof among all Conte iy the photograpnéd cover appeared to be the only person--a non-Latin, and pessibly an American--who entered the Soviet installation, that-day. On the chance that there could be an association between the \ph& “wr identification data derived from the voice intercept and the descriptive data derived from bp eta eva pros the photograph, the Shation reported the two elements in its cable to Headquarters on:8 October. 13
14-00000 an a A trae ten nt oon rarpee DRAFT iS CR, weer Pe cee pret tear linn. “a anaes % ae YY The Station's action was not un TT Gh eeing OE — wad jprtficd yas Rea cand initiatory staté@ of the OSWALD identification. . Many examples of a similar kind of thing, can be found in the. day-to-day record ‘of Station/Headquarters cor respondence raw tyseeforry — WY ‘ ae +9. Developments from 8 October’ -. 22 Noveinber 1963. Mexico. “|; City station: reportdd to Headquarters ‘on 8 October (received -in- ‘Headquarters 9 October) . the following initial information on’ OSWALD.” a, ans 1. On 1 Oct 63;.an American-male whg spoke --  -:. . . broken Russian and said his name Lee OSWALD (phonetic), -stated he was at SovEmb on 28 Sept vnon Axe with &/ consul whom he believed to-be Valeriy Vladimjfovich ' a - “KOSTIKOV. Subject asked the Soviet guard {Ivan] # -OBYEDKOV, who answered, if there anything new a , . ee regarding a ‘telegram to washington. OBYEDKOV upen — pe checking said nothing had been received yet, but the © ee. request had been sent. © . BRE ee Mexico Station said it 2./ had photos of a male who appeared to be an American entering Soviet Embassy 1216 hours, leaving 1222 on 1 Och. Apparent age 35, athletic build, circa 6 feet, receding hairline, baiding top. , Wore khakis and sport shirt. 3. No local dissemination was being made by the Station. awed fe Legal, x lathe ge hes. a ae ace warm Lang lc TR ming out eae here to Phen Ao on, é ere ees noe RE RE TREES Bra en REP
ar ny wR A PY ° ~ “ tages . Ly. Cas ‘ FY es ate Se SO! phe Use. Headquarters respemied) 04222 time, -?3 November 1964, . : = gee os . 2 as cancelling its {mmbdiate ly pkediddng request: 4 Fl. No need send staffer with photos. ‘We have askéed Navy for photos again, but Mexico can see OSWALD's picture sooner on the press wire. ce | ee whe - : | "2, Have-just re-emphasized to FBI nd€s the sensitivity | oe roa Bo ' of photos, you-are semling and also- relaying names of travelers with similar names. Noté. radio gays OSWALD lived - “under alias of 0. I. LEE. : a. On the 2ard at 17292: time, Headquarters advised 2 : : Mexico Citys besa | : “The FBI says that the photos of the man’ entering : 5 / : the Soviet Embassy which Hexice Station sent-to Dallas ... | : were not of Lec OSKALD. Presume Mexico Station has , 2 Paes double-checked dates of these photos and is also checking all pertinent tA ya photos for possible shots : of OSWALD.” 7 . 34. And at this point, 20482 time, 23 November, Mexico [re ote City Station agreed: ; _ ° A . "Saw photos of Lee OSWALD on television night of 22 November and it obvious photos sent to Dallas were not identical with Lee OSWALD held in Dallas. Dates are as given on photos. 25 . °
oer < ee St a rs mine rae ete: Peete oe eee ee te DRAF "Mexico Station is reviewing all avatlable photos of persons entering Saviet and Cuban Embassies.” 35. Two hours later (22542 time, 23 November 1963) the Station 1 n had reported the results of its effort te review all available - overage: . en “Complete récheck of photos of all-visitors to . ae 1 ' Giban mnBassy from August through first half of November against good press photes shows no evidence. of OSWALD visit, similar At inte against all soviet . “Embassy photos Fron 1 September. note, only visit wee know he made was to Cuban Embassy 28 September, Saturday, on which Embassy closed and we haW not had oS ' coverage . _ 2” i 26
14-00000 36. With. this communication the matter of the “unidentified individual*® reaches the end of Phase 1, the key ‘element of which is the conviction at first latent, then expressed, that the .photogtaphed individual might be identical with OSWALD. This dpplicg especially to ‘the Station, though "at a certain point evén Headquarters moved no rebuttal déspite a Lhe. ‘har { ied - +e JeRCL Ep et orto: oo ctl, . ‘4 n va tau x thy disiiaptiis * Joindl pha sal oom aed mock 0 OA ea pe So 2 37.0 Phis revliewshas attempted tO deal even-handedly with ° - all items -in- the Case record that have a-bearing on what happened. ‘The’ operational zeal, innovativeness and the high committment of all involved, especially in Mexico City, speaks for itserf. “Equally apparent - because of the -20 - 20 advantage of hindsight = is the evidence of non-per formance. It was : a critical failure, for example, that no photo of OSWALD was made available - though it was expressly requested both at , . te Headquarters and by the field - or that it was not more ; . aggressively ‘sought by cIAa, before the twenty~second of November. A ohotograph of OSWALD would have obviated - in a way the mere possession of a correct physical evidently could not ~ the whole | | on tligin OF successive deterioration of what began @s an impressionistic selection of the photograph on 1 October 1963 into a cause celebre today.
watt “never has there teen 82 cause cCelotbre with less intrinsic merit... 4 Equally clear © shauid be the demonstration of the facts them= gelvesg that there was’ nothing contrived or conspired in what happened unless \4s we have now descended to that point in. human values achieved under STALIN in the USSR and under. HITLER on in Germany, where just &@ plain mistake is per se evidence of a oo, cénspiracy.. ren, \ .- 53 The Genesis and Development of-ObUM Exhibit Ne. 1 and Commission Exhibit 237. Special Agent of the FBI, Bardwell D. ODUM, on- 23 November 1963 showed one of the six photos flown up .from Mexico City the previous day to OSWALD'S mother, Marguerite OSWALD. | ODUM himself had trimmed the off .the background by straight photograph Bardwell‘s own detailed account may be found in HEARINGS, op cit, Vol. XX, p. 268 AY a ‘4Q. The photograph shows the unidentified individual in a black shirt. It was one of the five photos taken of him . ; in front of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City on 4 October 1963, two days after OSWALD had left the city. ay “41. At this point for the recora the total available — . photo coverage of the unidentified individual numbers twelve photographs: ca _@ Five taken on 1 October 1963, entering and exiting the Soviet Embassy, xe is garbed in‘'a white shirt a light colored (khakai) trousers, a
14-00000 _--Headquarters as integral parts of the OSWALD the Soviet Embassy. He is aqarhe! in a dark, open, bubton- down shirt anaxdaxkxkyausars with a high neckline under- Shirt showing and dark trousers. c. Two taken on 15 October 1963 in front of the Cuban Embassy. He is wearing a dark, colliarleas T-shirt | or light sweater. . . . - oO 1 " The negatives of “all ‘of these are extent and-are now held fh . and related ‘file holdings. Af , ‘42. The result of ODUM’s display of the photographs- to oa : 4 | repeat, a cropped version of one of those noted under paragraph 41b, mK above - was Mrs. Marguerite OSWALD's allegation that she had been shown a picture of her son's killer, Jack RUBY, FY day before he perpetuated the deed! Again the Warren Commission Report. (pp. 364.- 365, 367) exhaustively disposes of this erroneous charge and requires no repetition here. A complicating fact developed along the way was Mrs. OSWALD's (correct) obser- vation when she finally admitted before the Commission that the ODUM photograph was not RUBY, was that the photo had been cropped differently from the one she had peen shown in Dallas. Inspector MALLEY's cropped version of the ODUM phctograph became Commission Exhibit 237 (see HEARINGS, Vol. XVI, p. 638). it dy . ‘ : 43. The net effect of the developments in the A anrryo of the Commission was to require the admission of the cropped photograph into evidence in a chain of deposikions beginning with 29
. any. fori on ODUM, inciuding the FOL Insrector, James 8. MALLEY who had ote eit trimmed the vhotograph used by the Commission in Washington} and Mr. HELMS, who deprseck for the originator. These docu- ments speak for themselves and will be found in the HEARINGS, Vol. XI,’ pp. 468= 470. — i . , Vo oo, . : . . 44. . Mexico City Station and other senior Agency officers strongly advised against the publication of the photograph in . . , - wer “the grounds that ‘the Soviets would be imnediately oo alerted to the exitence of’.a-useful.and continuing U.S. ~ 5 “ . , “4 intelligence operation and the operation would. go down the drain. There were-repeated cables exchanged on this point between Headquarters and Mexico City Station during the summer of 1964 in particular from 23 September to 15: October 1964 when the Station had plans underway to abandon the operation. Jt 45. %XIn acceding to the Commission's request for a deposition . A. ; . . Mr. HELMS. then the Deputy Director Fo Plans, replied affirmatively to Mr., RANKIN by memorandum of 23 June 1964 which including the following additional observation: "The Central Intelligence Agency recommends that this photograph not be reproduced in the - Comaission’s report because it would jeopardize a most confidential and productive operation. In addition, it could be embarrassing» a? to the individual involved who as far as the Agency is aware had.no‘connection with 30
Lee Harvey OSWALD or the assassination of President KENNEDY." A . . oo a6. In this instance the needs of the Commission prevailed over the DCI's statutory obligation to protect sources and - . i methods. The “Wnidentified Tnaiviauaie ‘remains to. this day. : ca y. unidentified and there is no credible evidence up to this 9. 7 re time to rebut the assertion made by Mr. HELM's in’ the concluding senténce of hid memorandum.to Mr. RANKIN on 23 June 1964 e.¥ And the photo operation did, as predicted, go down the drain. ; Cogs Within a week of the public appearance of the ODUM Exhibit No. L and Commission Exhibit: 237, members of the Soviet Embassy began systematic efforts to survey the surrounding buildings, . : , ostensibly for rental space, but clearly their inquiries were directed to spotting possible camera sites. The operation was continued in any case. Within a year it had become almost - totally unproductive in coveraye on Americans in contact with the Embassy - a clear sign that this category of visitor was being warned away the the Soviets themselves. :
14-00000 . ' PHASE THRES: @rne“UNIDENTLY TED MAN” PHOTOGRAPHS, 1964 = 1375 ! Lome ‘As could be foreseen there has been persistent pressure by’. critics of the Warren Commission Report to’ exploit bise ODUM Exhibit and Commission Exhibit No. 237 for partisan interpretive. purposes. A considerable correspondence’ has accunfulated Since. the end. of “1964 in which the Agency has atteripted te be responsive to these 7 . requeste/eisuttaneovsly, to satisfy what has been a ‘sole interest “ . 4, from the inception of the matter: to protect the method of acquisition of the photograph and the which made the acquisition possible. 5b Following are highlights from the correspondence @rom the current phase: a. On 16 May 1967 over the siynature of ths General Counsel of the Agency, Lawrence R. foustons CIA voluntarily alert thy pletigers be submitted se statement, to Judge Bagert of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana. The response dealt. affirmativeizy with the contents of the subpoena that had been delivered to the United States Marshall in the District of Columbia J ? t cor aoe - Pe (despite the fact that the’ subpoena could not be executed because of | the lack of jurisdictioneQyr. Houston proferred on Agency behalf categoric assurances to the court regarding/ inaccural statements wr ata “and inferences made by Mr. Garrison in New Orleans about the —, ss ss " Se Ere rae ome 2 TERE yes + Sarre RITE A “PETE M eMC RELI ee ENIURTSE SGR wn
14-00000 etd fo mo bs gl photograph of the unidentified individasi. The following is Guetea:* : from Mr. Houston's memorandum: “Because of the publicity which has surrounded . the Orleans Parish Grand Jury proceedings, we have “recently catried out an exhaustive search of the ‘files of the Central Inteli ence Agency for any ‘picture of Lee Harvey -Oswald 5 eaken“in nexied. As. Loe a result of this seach, I can state categorically. . . that the: files of this Agency do not’ contain, and S _never have contained, any such picture of - BT 7 Lée Harvey Orwald ‘taken in Nexico and that we have ~ no inférmation whatsoever that, any such’ photograph oo = ever existed. To the best of our knowledge and -. information, therefore, there is na such photograph. - c © Furthermore, the photograph which is printed in the ST, Warren Commission Report, Exhibit xo. 237 in | a Volume XVI, never contained more than one figure, a ; and the figure in the photograph Repicts an indi- - vidual who, to our knowledge, has not been identified. 7 ws atyeta The circumstndces of the filing of thie photograph with the Warren Commission are set forth in affidavits 7 “ot bages 468 and 469 of Volume XI, Hearings Before the uN Se President's Commission on the Assassination of : President Kennedy. Consequently, we have no record of any photograph that answers in any way the descriv- tion of the one we understand was requested in the subpoena. " "YE hope you will accept this information in this form in the spirit of cooperation in which it is proferred.” , . | . . [.. The Agency has repeatedly ‘services requests about the identity ae . ‘ . . of the unknown individual Mr. Emory L. Brown, Jr., Rte ved, Box 82 SO fo _— / Sqanqum.Road, Farmingdale, New Jerseys the last exchange of correspondence . , NN a in our record covered the period 4 ~ 17? April 1970. ee 1 OPT TEE, Pera TPAD T LE A: SATEEN So MEME Ger meee se sein StE: 2 eh earner Se CRATER ET I IT nA ONEINBE Nae I Sep, 3 Se < . a? oe POT rs : nf Tevite Be OrtertTrs
14-00000 BRAY Ley it 2, component res sponsi’ble Tee the Department of. State, the FSI routine électriteai transmission ithe-report- receive Gtation-tovether with GHIA NST 2 (Aire _ as approximately 35 years if On 10 Octuber 1963 at 2¢llt time the WH Division! . cee Ned ant actics ee thi ish rovers) tissesinatal ec S Ste penne ate RA cee tenn ee it ne ae Nett ny i ty and ithe Navy Department by wneGe Be . £roh.Mexieo—- 2 tlhe siy 5° - Fw ile, a Hateral ‘details drawn from ee ee momar eee ane a anne le . . 7 4 review: lL. On. 1 October “1983 a-relidble ‘and sensitive. . ‘source in Mexico reported that an Ancrican male, who identified himself as Lee CSWALD, contacted the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City inguicing whether the Enbassy had received any news concerning a telegram.which had been sent to Washington. ‘The American was described . re) eld, with an athletic build, Are coe about. six feet tall, with a “recéding” hairline. 2. It is believed that OSWALD may be identical to Lee lienry [sic] OSWALD, born on 18 October 1939 in New Orleans, Louisiana, a former U.S. Marine who defected to the Soviet Union in October 1959 and later made arrangements throuch the United States Embassy in Moscow to return to the Ynited Shates with his Russian- — born wife, Marina Nixolaevna PUSAKOVA (sic) and their childs “ oo 3. The information in paragraph one is being ° disseminated to your representatives in Mexico City. * i5
14-00000 Any further information received. on this subject will be furnished you. ‘This information is being. _ . made available to the bmmi gration ant -fleceatt zation oo fe : Services ‘ ‘ . re ; 2% Although ‘the reaction of the ‘iléadquarters desk was | ne a ' "by the. hook® and in good’ time; there were a number of errors in. _ uo 5 : -this advisory to the departments which) on the record were concerned ~ 7 with the OSWALD case: - a . : ; = ss a ae Ae ; oe -. "a. OSWALD's middle name was iis gootied« "Henry": for ‘ . . i Harvey. seated were eaters ra f b. His wife's maiden name-was misspelled: "PUSAKOVA”. t . . ~ sep ween oe : co Baton ‘Co seat thon, pesit Lott, Ne oda : : _ 1 . Neither of these errora ake significant, More important wags: - are we ; . , G. Paragraph 2.0f the Mexico City Station's report , fo _ ‘which had dealt with a woncurrent, but separate, phenomenon, am, i tor v7 gee description of an individual observed going into and out of ’ + the Soviet Embassy had been locked on to Lee OSWALD as an alleged “y e is! descriptive fact. (there can be no question that this misreading . ae 4 is of the Mexico City Station report was an analyst's error , which escaped detection in the coordination before release: “ the descriptive details attributed to OSWALD were so far off 1 the mark as to be immediately recognizable as such by the 4. Vin Heataantinn, naboren bath th Nan recipients a partial explanation, if not exculpation, “\ Has
of the. cable compdsed by. the same anaivs? AH be rt recrblied that as of that morese CLA had no photograpr . ' “- . ° St : yer Noe Or gan Magee GS of OSWALD -to refer=to.J) A . 2 23. Confirmation of this judgment is provided by the contents and sent as of 22093 time (two heurs later) to Mexico City Staciccyine Grimerny Letete ats £ Selokew sekG } 1. Lée OSWALD who caliag Scvbab, 1 oct . probably identical Lee Henry feicl OSWALD born 7 . is Oct, 1939, Now ‘Orieans, Louisiana: former radar operator in United States Marines who defected 7 to ussr in oct 1959, OSWALD is five feet ten inches, one hundred sixty five pounds, Light Brown’ wavy hair, blue eyes, / 2. On. 31 Oct 1959 he attested to renounce | his United States citizenship to the United States f citizenship. On 13 Feb the US ixb Moscow received an undated letter from OSWALD vostmarked Minsk on. five Feb 1961 in which sub} inéicated he desired return of his US PPT as wished tc return to USA 3f£ “we could came to some agreement concerning the dropping of any. legal proceetifgs against me." On 8 July on his own initiative he appeared at the wen Eb’ with his wife to see about >is return to States. PE Ee eT ee ES ee
for Soviet citisenshiy and that his application at that time had been to remain in USSR and for temporary extension of his tourist visa pending outcome of his request. This application, . ae according to OSWALD, contained’ no re& to Soviet citizenship. OSWALD stated that had. been | “employed :since 13 Jan 1960’ in’ Belorussian radio 4 and tv-factory in Minsk where worked as metal workér in research shop. OSWALD was: married on. 30 April 1961 to Marina Nikolaevna PUSAKOVA [sic] a dental technician born 17 July 1942 USSR. No Hdgs traces. He attempted arrange for wife to join him in Moscow 80 she couid appear at Emb peel) for visa intérview. His American wee (was returned oy ca to. him. US Em Moscow atated twenty ‘months of realities of life in Soviet Union had clearly had maturing effect on OSWALD.  j>. fe 3.. Latest Hdqs infa was an FBI report dated May 1962 saying FBI had determined OSWALD is still US citizen and both he and his Soviet wife have ‘ exit permits and Dept State had: :given approval —r ra oe the Embassy — to the FBI, the Navy, and I&NS locally. The inf&lwTr, their travel with their infant child to at 4. ( Station should pass/intd™: “eetitgha para one . ; A 18
tee a we vprtnaber QS Qaran two and thren ordqinake with the FBI. 5. Ret S amb pogsible identification being disseminated ta-Hdys of FBI, State, Navy, AND ISNS. Pis.keep Hdgs advised on any further contacts or positive identification of OSWALD. : > ‘ a ayhe Headquarters teedbuck of -OSWALH's correct description . should have béen sufficient, in view of the Ancona with the detalié assucsa! fron’ the photo of the unidentified males. to. keep set, 8 senha frmiaces lnvestisntive FETEY, Heston cht A tren tins anaremnant at ee Sete aap iu _ Station on 15 October 1963,- th Any they] asked Headquarters to “Wp lease pouch 4 photo of OSWALD." Headquarters electrically delivered to the Department of the. Navy the following message o~* 24 Bele, 146%; ; “Lee Henry [sic] OSWALD... . “Tt is requested that you forward te this office as soon as possible two copies of the most recent photo graph you have of subject. Wo will forward them to our representative in Mexico, who will attempt to determine if the Lee OSWALD in Mexico City and subject are the same individual." No photo had been received by CIA by 22 November 1963. ig
PR ARPT 26. Within its limitations and capabilities, Mexico City Station had done all it could to comply with Headquarters instructions: a. Headquarters had been alerted and in turn those agencies with an investigative or policy“interest in OSWALD b> #*+ , Chad been alerted, both in Washington and in the field.” _b, Mexico City had no further contacts by OSWALD to report because--as it was .Jitimately ascertained--he had left Mexico City’on 2 October. Os c. OSWALD was not an Agency investigative responsibility, in any case, Eveh with a photograph, 4t would have. taken very. - special efforts triggered by the cther interested U.S. agéncies_ to have made a positive identification in view of OSWALD's hotel registration under alias. oe , ee There the matter. rested until mid-day 22 November 1963. 24. The Insertion of the Photo of the Unidentified Individual ms Seo Yt with the Chain of ais. On 22 November 1963 the Mexico City - Se Station cabled Headquarters at 22292 time after learning of the arrest of Lee H. OSWALD, age 24, possibly in connection with the . . CY assassination, and veférenchth its earlier message o ff ana 15 October e.66 t? 4 and Headquarters’ reply of 10 October. The station{ Regt FG . 4 , irdguest priority pouch/phdto/ ostaLo so that Station can check all recent coverage for OSWALD. Forwarding soonest a v9 copies of only visitor to SovEmW 1 Oct who could be iden- f tical with OSWALD.® 20
14-00000 Te as clea: that Mexies City Station had forgetten nhat rm according te its éen communication the ‘unidentified male in the photo was of "arparent age 35" and that the accurate éesc rintion of OSWALD forwarded by Headquarters on the 10th precluded the person whom they regarded as the "only visitor to the Soviet _ Embassy on 1 teber who could be identical," could indeed be. a. Fo: 27. The station had meanwhile) begun an ‘exhaustive and. - accelerated review of all its technical and photographic intelli- .génce. A dispatch was prepared in accordance with the indication ; given in ‘the cable of 22’ November, cited in paragraph 25 above. The dispatch noted that photo coverage of the unidentified indivi- - dual had turned up on 4 and 15 October at the Soviet and Cuban seem Bet den .Embassies, respectively. The text of the 22 November 1963 pouched. : | dispatch yidek. nerd 5 , " "2. Attached are copies of the only photographs obtained . . . on 1] October 1963, which appeared to be 3 an American. This same man visited the Soviet Embassy | on 4 Octeber 1963. "2. Copies of these photographs were shown to the [sic] U.S. Ambassador on 22 November 1963 and a copy of each of 7 the two photographs was given to Chief FBI, Mexico, on that date, 4 e 8 . ‘ . a H *"p.S. Photographs dated 15 October 1963 were inserted after typing of dispatch. These were taken as [the] ‘person 21
14-00000 vpfney *s 4 3 "omitted from paragraph: ‘two of. the dispatch between the words "two" “and "photographs. “ ‘entered the Cuban Enbassy." Attached’ were eight photographs: four (of which two were marked l October on reverse) -showiny the individual in a white shirt dnd four (unmarked on reverse) showing the individual in a black shirt... It would seem to be logical that the word "sets" was probably 38. That ‘the. Station was working -under forced draft ‘is ey fucked - oe A “material- Mneneneen the. dispateh, which faét. frsorted as a péstscript. that fact was reported simultaneously © by cable to Headquarters. at’ 00532 time, 23 November: "1. México Station has photos same unidentified American type who is possibly OSWALD entering Cuban : Embassy on 15 Ovtober. Searching for possibility photo-documented entry Cuban Embassy other days . "2. Also attempting establish OSWALD entry and departure Mexico.” 31 223Mry7 1965 29. Headquarters, at Oli 3b & time, asked Mexico Station to send a staff member with all photographs to Headquarters.on the next available flight. 30. Concurrently with or before the foregoing cables to Lt Headquarters, the Chief of Station, Mexico City spok¢g directly ‘ é by double-talk telephone with the Western kenisphere Chief of 22
woe er WRONG Ree , tek balan ed GC. RING, and secured permission te aive copies of rans , photographs of ¢ the unidentified individual to the Legal At tache and to make : es ae “ei af e tie 2Re - fee 7 hope! wees os » he eog al then known to the’ mbassaor 5 the-. next. develonment—i bane gleardy. reflected ina “personal note ‘by the Chief of Station to the ' baig ol Cif ha) copies of the photographs , by the’ ens ‘representative who: delivered theme the FBI sn that ‘etey.. aa ay PS at uovonber 1963 “pear d.c. [KING]: "Reference is made’ to our conversation of 22 November in which I requested permission to give the Legal Attache copies of photographs. of a certain person who is known to you. "Attached are copies of each of the photoyraphs we have with the dates of the visits stamped on the back. "AL € p.m. Mexico time on 22 November, The Ambassador decided that this was important enough to have a member of the Legal Attache's,office take copies of these pictures to Dallas, Texas. The Naval Attache is making a special | flight from Mexico City for this purpose. The Legal Attache's officer who is going to Datlas has promised to mail this material to you for me. t Se *Copies of these photographs are also being sent by 23 be 0: Division. chief, mailéd to the latter from. Dallas, oothor, th
14-00000 ° , DRA ET “ pouch which will Teave Mexico City en the night of 22 November 1963. “Best wishes. . e . *win (SCOTT]*: oe & . . . . os * According to the sidelined comnient$ on this letter, the Legal © ‘Attache's officer was Eldon RUDD. — “ Pr _ 34s The decision ‘to remit ‘the photographs to the FBI in” ‘ ¢ ‘Dallas had been made by the AmbasSador, according to the Chief of . ‘ - Station, who simultaneously with: the FAI. agent's departure reported Le . to Headquarters by cable (02442 time, 23 November): “FBI agent left here 2000 local time with two copies each-— “ _ of six photes of a person suspected to 'be- OSWALD, ona ‘ . | ; special flight for Dallas. He is cateying/Mmvetape with . one copy each photo for airmail special, from Dallas to J. C. KING at home as per telephone conversation with | scorr. One copy of each of these photos plus a copy of each of the photos showing the same person exiting the Cuban Embassy forwarded by memorandum leaving by regular pouch tonight. In view of above does Hqs ‘still want a staffer with additional photc (s) ?" + 24 Fee page
14-00000 be, stipulated in summary: - , : There is no increrient of cr ‘edible ‘evidence, oc uo plans’ State; oes ad of Soviet and Jor Cudan politiéal, intelligence or: OF he este Clipe ; security. Service involvement to what was developed ‘ A ' : and considered. by the Warren Comission and its staff< | ; _ The. Commission® s findings: .on the basis: of. credible a Ls moe, : . “evidences that Lee: Harvey OSWALD was the killer. i. oo a ° - ” of Presi@ént RENNEDY ai officer ‘TrPerT and dia’ _ . ran os | them ‘alone and of his own: ‘determination pant Stands, ‘be “*credible evidencé* th y iad. . tipsgt or not. exist An. Washington, ‘Bu’ Such evidence could , : exist in: Hoscow anavor aiagas » whol ‘rolantary inputs until there ‘has been: a- ‘ful disclosure by these governinents: of all elements | oe. -OSWALD' s handling’ ‘and stay in, the soviet Union and his - te contacts in’ Mexico: City. The. Warren conn tission report, snould have Aste a wider fgindow" for ‘this. contingency ® - a 2 oat That, indeed ,was’ the opinion: at the working level | a ‘particularly: in the counterintelligence component ine, CIBe ny v 1964, 4S war vi isalef h, Ms talon 1 fa Luft. foe . an ° c. in the absence of additional or new tom ga Ccredible" evidence, there are * aaowe bor eeclegenggoneeense in the record that emerge as “noteworthy, in the light of the other conclusions. Thege are reviewed and summarized below, item-by-item. Stokoe cos fate |
ue my d. CASTRO'S warning and ‘threat’ of. 7 Septeriber 1963. “if OSWALD did indeed read it. ‘in New Orleans - must be considered of great significance: in the. Light: of the atho ey, evolution j fhe pee taal “Walbers wn, Gposl/fy, of OSWALD! s passive/aggressive poner and. his lf Comes One with ‘Fidel CASTRO and the Cuban: revolution which is. directly. traceable oo oy as. far: “back ' ag ‘his. ‘Maz ine! Conve gerutes in: ag Beto, ‘California. we %
14-00000 DP ey bed ap te wo € Fes 3 7, Ke Xr an po gy 408 Santa Cuban Contact with Leé Harvey OSWALD, 5 1958.2). Co G, "The testimony of Nelson DELGADO contains an assertion of germinal significance to vatly. ‘review ot ‘the ‘packground of ‘ Lée- Harvey OSWALD'S. ‘feeling’ toward ana. relations with CASTRO'S a Cuba. - DELGAD was ‘probably, ‘the - closest’ peer® group member, to" , ae ; y Sasi dur ng: ‘his. apeoialadt, ‘tegining period. at El TOxo° ‘Marine > Corps. aed’ note of this? eine ae aoe on .- "OSWALD told DELGADO that ‘he. was: in: “touch | with ‘Cuban ‘aiplomatie ‘officals: ‘in: this, counteys, awhiieh: DELGADO at. first: ‘took - to be ‘one’ ‘of his — BR te Loe iV 5 By ee “es, but later believed. Lo. “actually DEE operational: significance’ ‘than’ cis: reelected, by: the. Language. oe the in itivestigation, ‘ Sie of the: Beginning of ‘OSWALD! s 5 Eelationship pk with, ‘the Cubans, ‘Starts with, a, question mark. core aan AL. Tie period was’ ‘one “of, ‘transition, in vu. ‘$25 ‘Cuban relations afte = CASTRO'S takeover.. -OswaLD, ana DELGADO a at, the outset, were CASTRO Supporters OSWALD being: particularly keen about how to oy! pate . get SiGe ELGADO testified t I didn’ t know what to tell him, so ft eee told him the best thing that I know. was to get-in touch with a Cuban Embassy, you know. But at ; that an that time/I told him this - we were on a terms with Cuba, you know, so this wasn’t no suber- & . ee Sion or pralnctiad”, you know. I didn't know | what to answer him. I told him to see them. Resort to the President! s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Rennecy Washington, 1964), p. 687 Hereafter cited as Report.
wu tite fate en wAEter a while he told mo he was in contact with them ... ".. LT seen this envelow in his fcotlocker, wall-locker, and it was addressed’ to him, and they had an official geal .on ity and as far as I could . recor tee that was mail from Los Angeles, and he - was. telling me there wa's a- Cuban Congul. And just after he started receiving these’ letters - _ You see, he: would never ge out, but atay neat the post ali ‘the time aes ; : ity Wee he had one. “Visitor atter he: started receiving” letters he had one visitor. It was a ian, eh because. I got the’ call. Erom. ‘the MP quaicd ‘shack; voy ee _ and they, gave me a “cail that: ‘oswanb: ‘nad a visitor - ce eee " at. the front. gate. This man had to be a civilian, ., otherwise ‘they would have let him ins So Y. had to Find ‘Soinebody, 6 relieve OSWALD, who was cy guard, to go ‘down. there- ‘to visit with: this £éllow, and they . ". Spent. about an hour and a haley, two hours talking, I guess, and he came back. t dont t Know who the man _was or what they: talked “about, but he ‘looked: nonchalant about: the whole. thing when he came back. He never mentioned who he was) nothing. : a "Mr. Liebeler: How long did he talk to-him, do you remember? . , "Mr. Delgado: -About'an hour and, half, two hours... “Mr. Liebelers You never asked OSWALD who this fellow was that he talked to? “Mr. Delgado: No. No... “Mr. Liebeler: Did you connect this visit that OSWALD had at that time with the Cuban Consulate? “Mr. Delgado: I did ; because I thought it funny for him to be receiving a caller at such a late date - time. Also, up to this time he hardly ever received mail; in fact he seldom received mail fromhome because I made it a policy, I:used to pick up the mail for our unit and distribute it to the guys in there, and very seldom did I ever see one for him. But every so often, often afte, Fa L°)
° . . “ . . . he slarted to get in centact with these Coban pecole, he started vetting letter pamchlets and REWSPAPETS +6 and he also started receiving letters, you know, and no + hcke gi. Baybe panphlets,: you is little*#Like church, things we get from church, you Know, but’ ae wasn! ‘t a church. ms , “Mr. Liebeler: Were the ey citten dn spanish, any of them, do an you know? * . a, "Mr. Déigado: Not that I ean ‘recall: no. Mes Liebeler: bid you have any reason, to believe that these ovate eoatt ehinga: come to oswabo from the Cuban Consulate? on a pees Bart re re ra Me. Delgado: Welly I ‘took: it for. granted that ‘they aid ater. qr, oe “wets = Seen: the envelope. know «+ Something Like’ a Mexican, eagle; with a: a big.” OF inpressiWW seal. you now. They, had different colors: on ity red. and whites-almast Looked like: ‘our ealérs,, you Knows: “but 1 cant to “recall the. seal... T just kriew ae was. in: ies ins United soriething | F Like that.” ‘if ‘couldn! te “understand. “Ie was ‘Latin. : - ; . "Mr, Liebelers- You don’ t know for sure whether it ‘was “from the Cuban Consulate? co me te an , PPE ae Mr, Delgado: No. ‘But he had told me-prior, just\before'r | re ‘found that envelope in his wall locker, that. he was receiving mail - eee from ‘them, and’ ‘one time he offered to show it to ine but I wasn't mene much interested because at the time: we. had work to ‘do, and I never did ask to ‘gee "that paper again, you Kiow. a . . ae eee "Mr. Liebeler: Dad he tell you: what nis correspondence with the , ~ ~ Cuban Consulate was about? — "Mr. Delgado: No, -he ‘didn't. "Mr. Liebeler: | Did he ever indicate to you that it had to do with the conversations that you had about going over to Cuba? “Mr. Delgada: No. -The only thing he teld me was that right 74 after he had this conversation with the Cuban people was that he was QL got out of the service he was gang to Swizterland...& gang to --oncee he Prolume VIII, pp. 241-243.
7 ios VALD's application Lo Albert, “sohwoiteet College, chirwaiden, Switzerland, was dated 19 March 1959, and he was - "presumably to” ‘report’ there on. 20, april ‘1980. ‘Destined for a diseharge from the Marines on 7 December 1959, OSWALD accelefated . ; his exit. on alleged grourids of family hardship in early : Septenber- 1959. ‘On, 27 ‘Septeriber 1959 he was issued au. S. Meee, inland on 15, octoper 1959. a Basepore valid. for! ‘travel’ ~ among other places to" ‘Cuba’, and ‘the’ - 1 ussR.. “We entered the. Soviet: Union’ frot J! seato'stettoony has the. cast of, or reaupiniey. ‘qeanting ae the; contact’, ‘DELGADO*S resumption” is: that” ‘the was- ‘fz6m ‘the. huss. /Cuban diplomatic. and consular relations were severed on 3. January 1961, ge eTEES aE iy Seis
“ we know, according to Prognostications, “that he will die. within the - present years, 1962. * an] -re-reviewed all of its material after the assassination... The file  keflects no followup or formal: dissemination of the report. | mah a ee @ Prediction "of Bresident KE KENNEDY 's Demise by Communist party Celt Leader Morse BENITEZ “tabota, ive2. TJronraes to Headquarters on 9 tanuary 1964 @ duplicate copy of a raw report ‘bi a penetration dated ‘5 January _ £962 describing ‘events at, the yearly Communist Party cell. meeting.” The , -cell- leader, Morse BENITEZ. ‘Zabola,. said that. the Communist — Party. in Guatemale: wshould forin a sitigle new, party: tie need nt preoccupy ourselves over. the: polities of. Presideace ‘KENNEDY .because \ \ | This réport dpparéntly nad been discounted a lath tical . when it notebeds. received and | was ‘riot forwarded: until ‘the gation” Fa a,
rhe Ge . FAD oa he te naphas replied: “waust. wait, ‘just: wait. | Enigmatic, Threats by Cuban Third Secretary in The Hague, 7 November 1963. BGA sensitive liaison source, reporting after the KENNEDY “assassination, indicated that at ‘the Sovivt reception on i November. 1963, thé Cuban Third Secretary, Ricardo Le SANTOS ‘Pewas discussed the recent refugee’ raids on ‘Cuba and their, implications with a: .-host-country diplomat; coheluding with the adfiénition® Je, * just: wait and you: will see what we. can, do} Tt will happen” goon. Asked ‘to be tite” ‘specific what would Happen, soon, SANTOS ~ ~ Ub Ainese | data Were passed ta. the Warren: Comnitsision by memorandum, 31 March 1964. SANTOS. was. roeesiquaiaid Fepor ted "to ‘ have. a history “of mental instability and: was. ‘subitiarily récalldd’ from The Hague, reportedly for. réasons’ “related to that ‘taét ‘tn’ i ‘April’, 1966. t 16
a WORN YS aece s “Lutsa- jokingly replied: “Yes, of course, I knew. dt almost. before: ‘ Kenedy ‘eee “Imagine, one, ‘two, ‘three: and now's. that makes! ‘three’. off so it would not Appear that they were celebrating the death: _of KENNEDY, nor would they | have’ ‘the party coincide with the -burial. . a doctor (a worian) friend. - : : . Intercepted Conversation of cuban Embassy Employes, . Luisa CALDERON, Altern aon of 22 _Hovembe r.1963 na , aw At 1730 Mexico City time, about five hours after ithe KENNEDY agaassination, WyAeVitions a Cuban Embassy employee ‘named *Luisa"” received a telephone ‘call’ in Spanish ‘from an. unidentified : . "ale outside. . “ye “the: caller asked | her at she had heara_ ‘the ‘latest news. an (she laughs) «, what barbarians !@s' 19 Both speakers ‘agreed’ ‘on the seriousness of. the assassination. © ee *Ludaa® also stated ‘that the party at Silvia, ‘DURAN ‘had been ealied Finally “she said she planned. to. ‘move that night: into the house of oye ya Lad’ hyperbole? Boastful ex ‘post ‘facto suggestion of fore= 9°” a ws knowledge? This is the only item in.the intercept @ coverage scams 7. _ oes Cubans and Soviets after the ay that ‘ittewmdine © pelo or The as enigmatic character of “thie conversation - is sharply highlighted by the following facts: @« “Luisa” was probably identical with. Juuisa CALDERON, a cadre worker of the Cuban Directorate General of Intelligence {(DGI). She returned to Cuba in 1964 and was reported to be working in DGI headquarters. Bn The DGI element in Mexico City in the i. fall of 1963 was headed by Alfredo MIRABEL Diaz who had arrived on 2 September 1963, formally as the replacement of. the Congul Ems€bi@ AZCUE (departed 19 November 1963). The deputy DGI chief (and as of June 1964, MIRABEL's successor) was Manuel Eng@nio VEGA Perez. Gene stivre-poRae reamed “Ir-tartsets eonversattons was-the “receprionist, a Mexican
ate SEPT Lek te See TEE on tgs mag * @& The "Silvia DURAN” named in Luisa conversation was the receptionist, ‘a Mexican national, GAL : who (eo Harvey OSWALD% during Ris known ists _ on 27 and 28 September, to the Cuban installa= tions in. ‘connection with a cuban visa application for stay and/or. trai sits a at aa live witness regardity aa Silvia pURAN is the sole. ©. \ “activity in \ “Mexico city. -Her testimony, however, in its entirety . was” taken ‘and preserited, solely, by the Mexican a ee pet a rental. authorities. . A direct. confrontation 7 yith her |. Se o Mut rejected: ‘ty a . was Fequested by the Warren | Commi ssién ‘the. Mexican authorities. It is: ‘from silvia BURAN's -  s€atements that it was’ learned tna became engaged. .' " personal” ~ ‘in a/altercation on 27 September with Sus Bis ‘AZCUE: - ; da. Manuel Eugenio VEGA Peréz alias wareés and his DGI assistant, Rogelis RODRIGUEZ Lopez were | positively identified in February 1964 by two ihae- pendent sources as engaged in. the: active develoztient’ . and facilitation of, the training of Nicaraguan agents , - on for the. purpose of aSsassinating General Anastasig : oo we, SOMOZA. VEGA, ait is: ‘established, was on post in - Oe Mexico City during. OSWALD’ s stay there 27? September = 2 October 1963. ' 18Ft Mexico City on 3 November 1963 for Havana. It was reliably. reported about VEGA that all individuals going to Cuba, legally or illegally. | pass through him first. He took the biographical data and sent it to Cuba for name checking, a procedure which normally took 15 days. t> a . at, There is no evidence in the OSWALD case file that Silvia DORAN os was subjected to a systematic elicitative interrogation that would have related her dealings with OSWALD ¥ known and confirmed by intercept » with the data held Ape dey on the Cuban OGI y its personalities and methods 5 in Mexico City. Was it normal fora case like. OSWALD's 5 considering the fuss he allegedly wade with AZCUE y) for the’ applications to’ handled solely by a iocal enployee and a lame duck by AZCUE whose slot had been .taken epAtios by. the. DG chief Ranier eceeed Whatever the answer to ne » "F a FF taanpt, VEGA mont hance Koll be 5 dePis Fe at ae
duued yea ben Coe oy re lis % Ge. ne frog AS cx fal ‘Sa Theme 12 Ie Faas Flory Chrverinecll ff - ty Gate wmnete “planed bie ven Suoritd wee ee Ay Shee
ow! poke A “ ral ae ved Phebe FU (Tens the sore fundamental questien: accepting the CLAN story : 2 24s o on its face, oo uld it have happen ned Without Whe Dct ea above a pbb dsteetela 2% (CASTRO'S enlque deh intelligence and security = [piece could haves more in. its files than wISLTRD surfaced in the . - ff “DURAN. statements: 7 - Coming ‘back to ‘the beginning: ; “buisa" =, - . ’ Luisa CALDEROS = as a member Of: the DGI unit in Mexico city = could | 7 very well have known | ‘gomething. that would make what she said ‘to ‘ner : . a ° . : unidentified. caller: less’ a matter of boastful self-indulgence than was: ae ; ‘ . assumed | at, that titte.- . : . tops sath Ae catia ¥ fee a “> Lett ‘L, : : ‘ : foe & Ate, a _ i : poole ns Cron Per Gee, 9 ba 3 1 % t , ‘ye ta ° @ ‘ ae PR EL TERENAS Ee ELT EPP PERS TES MT TSS HE ESE ECT RA SMR EAE
14-00000 t : 8 ¥ > Silvia DURAN , Substantial T heintione ren he Sion of Admission of LUO 1b? . AL The defects viewed an hindsight of.the Silvia DURAN testimony already. have been suggested above. ain that context of criticism’ we it ‘would also be -‘rélevant to reconsider , the implications of the | two intercepted ‘telephone conversations on 26 November 1963 between, the Cuban President, DORTICOs, and his Ambassador to oe Mexico, Joaquim ‘eypitden Ay pia ase becatise ‘the, thrust ‘of the. conver- ealt with the question., whether Silvian DURAN had been" asked: ‘gation ¢ ° GE OAs Baten . bout. money ‘payinents ‘by. cher’ Mexican interrogators.) = mo, ; LO ”, St a4 i a 4» _ AS" ‘ot “séptember 1964 Silvia DURAN ‘gave up her Cuban pabassy| job, in ‘the Spring of. 1967 Silvia DURAN, ‘was: xeported by a reliable. x and sensitive. source to have cut’ ‘all relations’ with Cubans. Her account, of how she had been” taken ‘inte custody and - had been | 5 . it ‘ } tO, , a interrogated after the assassination repeated what was already known. of, os “She added, under ‘circumstances that did not. permit the source to Th ay ". challen e or elicit cokroborativ detail, that she had gone out PEN Bev ee ener Vag |
‘ bn eet in | American, whom. he identified as” OSWALD, ‘ eons money sometime in * of! the polygraph, on: which ALVARADO showed deception and ppringing: Alluyation: aterbal Contagt geatween QSWALL and Cuban Government th Partuonlar &oference to Allecations of {a} Elena GAREO de Eta and [b) Oscar CONTRERAS an. As the Warren Commission reported, “Literally dozens of allegations of a consyi iratorial contact between COSWAL Poand agents of the Cuban Governtent have © been investigated ... "&° akong these cases, . which consumed hundre of ‘Gia. man-hours in Headquarters: and abroad - oo hes i and similarly the FSE in ‘the United States ~ eooe bi the Nicaraguan walkitt in ‘MeNico » city | 26 November 1963 a ada the ALVARADO case: is ‘taken, “up in detail: by the Warren: Coninisaion “under thé ‘eyrptograph’ *p.* a ALVARADO. élained. that he had, Seen an So. a ae iveebing . ae mid-September 1963 in wm. fof tne. “caban Consulate in Mexéio. City. ALVADARO" s story was ultimately broken by. the use elites . hey ~ee WR ending ALVARADO's , Nicaraguan’ security - ‘service ! Bikeee? invo. the case. eh The. ALVARADO. story. is asparticularly: eacute representation of ‘the difficiilties that beset the evaluation of observed evidence: certain elements of the story ‘persist despite the impeachment of its major ” premises. En this ‘ase iALVARADO, whose account ‘did not become public: until the punffeacion of the Warren Report in October 1964, talked consistently of the presence in the Cuban Consulate transactiong of a Negro with red-dyed hair. . 27. Elena GARRO de Paz is.a mecurial, articular and socially prominent Mexican writer, married, but separated from a high-ranking Mexican foreign service official, She is, also, the cousin of Horacio DURAN, thé husband of Silvia DURAN, cited above. There is -a strong personal antipathy between the two women descending from Elena GARRO's trenchant anti-Communism. ‘ See Report, p. 305 ff. Somme 7 thy Ot, weet * te emo ge flaio Rosas Villeneuve a Cozunrsh avorl bund oe 2 tty See Report, pp..307 - 308 have F; Bar. Veco] g - GonboAde Ne~ rele 65 +t... tba Rebeset, Eden. GALLANT eee J farina , Col Yeon ) Avod | PEs ablation Af Ray DopKing, 5
retsrement in the fall of Lec? e From October, iv64d until his 2*7, is a u - i au. &. Embassy officer, Charics THOMAS, persistently kept up 3 stream of reports and momoranda reflecting GARRO's account of what had actually gone on between OSWALD, the Cubans and in particular Silvia DURAN in September 1263. including a repeated reference to- a Negro with ridged Ha “i rate, ge The fitst reference to the GARRO story was noted. in Mexico Station. Memorandum of Record dated 12 October. 1964: , ~ *Blena- GARRO- {said} that she and her: daugher . were invited: to. a ‘party at the. Cuban Embassy during’ ‘ the period she how finds out that OSWALD was here 7 in. Mexico, prior to’ the ‘assassination. She was 7 invited’ “by a Mexican secretary: in the. Cuban. Eibassy whose ‘husband. is a‘cousin o£ the: GARRO. fami ly © / [Horacio DURAN!" At ‘the party she saw three Gringos, not. drinking, not mixing ‘and’ more, or less ° “just. ‘standing, around: together like three: ‘burps on a ‘log. They were so ‘obviously ‘out of place, she asked: _ someone. in the” Cuban Enibagsy about them and was told that™ “they were. just’ passing througtie “She ‘clains™ that on. the way ‘these three Gringos stood out she took, a ‘good look at. them as" did her’ ‘daughter. When the . aasassination occurred and OSWALD'S picture was spread _into the’ newspapers, both Elena and her daughter immediately said that he was one of the three Gringos Without a doubt at the party. " 4 Bt GARRO repeated her. story to. Mr. charles William THOMAS, an Embassy political officer on 10 December 1965: In September 1963 after her semeven return from_abroad, she went to a party, accompanied by her daughter , at the home of Ruben DURAN ‘emphasis added}, Ruben is one of the two brothers of Horacio DURAN], who married her cousin. She 4 met OSWALD and “two other young Americans. ' ‘Other guests were the At the party she was discouraged from talking with him. . Cuban Consul AZCUE, General Clark FLORES, Silvia DURAN, who she later Emilio CARBALLIDO, and learned was OSWALD's mistress while he was here, a Latin ‘American Negro man with red hair [emphasis added}. November 1963 when the identity of the assassin became known, she and In
14-00000 | “then _ much, éredence to anything: she. ‘said: | her daughter went te the Cuban Embassy and shouted "assassins" and- other insults at the staff there & short ly afterward, she and her daughter were visited by a friend, Manuel CARVILLO. [ot CALVILLO) , an official in ‘the Secretariat of ‘the Gobernacion dh bolsawenge _ and were told he had orders to escort them to d.small and obsciire hotel. in ‘the center of ‘town, -- They were=kept, there for eight days. under pretext that they were ain danger. When. she told CARVILLO- she wanted to go to the _ Aner i¢an, ‘Embassy and expr what she -knew of OSWALD, she was told. that the Américan, Enbassy-was full Of Coniniinist. apies. Bey ‘on 25 Deceniber "1965 “and 9 January, 1966 in further interviews: ‘with THOMAS, CARRO. ‘and: heér- ‘daughter elaborated and om certain. . “patticulars significantly modified, her earlier ‘account. ‘She also, acknowledged that she and her daughter. had been interviewed ‘by Embassy ‘officers to whom she claimed they did not give a very. , , completed story ‘because the Embassy officers. did not ‘appear to- give . . . 433. It vie developed that GARRO and: daughter. had been interviewed _ by. the Legal Attached’ on 17° and 24- November 1964. Her information ‘had a : been similar: to" what she ‘claimed in- het. account to THOMAS , but had tery “not been substantiated by inquiries, — The FBI representative therefore considered the matter closed and reaffirmed his dis- “engagement from the matter to ‘the CIA Chief-of Station on 27 December 196S:-and to the Ambassador on 25 February 1965; + The Embassy Political Officer, however, persisted in his interviews and reporting. “A memorandum of conversation, 13 July 1966, in-which GARRO identified the place to which she had been taken by CALVILLO as the Hetel Vermont. (This detail checked out affirnativels, GARRO was at the Hotel 23 ~ 24, 25 - 27 and 28 - 30 November 1963.) “another, on 7 February 196%, imcwhtoh GARRO's anamsmink continuing vicissitudes with the Cubans are set out. And _ finally, upon THOMAS’ retirement from U.S. Government service, the Department of State, at his: request, 28 August 1969, disseminated to CIA and FBI a compilation of his reporting of the Elena GARRO nvewewnenen interviewg.. . ; ee a 3 There the matter rests. GARRO's chronology of the vents es described as having occurred in the Mexican ‘capital in FZ Thane pestinclags men wit waprrnnd 4y D etap ebaccontea, 7
Pebatye aa. Ug ere Boe Piiic ie eeto gs ae Drm mna at State eee tee Fo eat Oe Ee ee Sos Shay eee rare iia ilet or a ii Foe ee ete fig ew = os . September bod never coincided with the confirmed Gata (of CSNALD' s - : - 5 presence there. Her story however had two points congiince with alla- 2 gations by others regarding OSWALD: (a) ALVARADO's alleyations ~ [this detail could, ath, é guecount regarding the Negro with the réd-dyed hair however, have been gleaned from the Warren ( Commission’ é ‘of the “D" case] and (b) Sylvia DURAN's @wam later claim of intimate personal contacts with OSWALD. . oe - ag, Béginning ih March and aimpLitied in May 1967," the: American Consul, Benjamin J. RUYLE, in Panipico developed: a contact . with a: oeal Mexican’ journatise, Oscar” CONTRERAS Lartigie, who claimed: to: ‘have: encountered OSWALD with other _PEO=CASTRO students at tha. 1 oo 7 “university: of Mexico campus ‘in september 196860 “Oh In June ‘1369, "CONTRERAS was’ Late vicwed. by 4 a CIA of fier: aS ae oe ‘He studied. law at ‘the. Unviersity of Mexicd fo£. oe a So three years; approximately 1960 | - 1964. tie “Belongéd , to .a Clandestine pro-CASTRO Revolutionary group at. _ oe Co ae the. university. Regarding the OSWALD case he was - . - a ok, eh extremely cautious and although, he was not ‘able or ., eS “willing t to give’ ‘dates: and: hanes, he said oswaLy - wn 7 ; . yo J visited the University of Mexico campus: shortly Ce I after the cuban’ Embassy refused him-a visa to- te . - 7 ae visit Cuba. “OSWALD made inquiries regarding — . a vt Progcuben, reoluttonary groups at the = University ee so re OSWALD met CONTRERAS and four other persons as” 7 CE they came out of a round-table discussuion held ., . E in the faculty of Philosophy. OSWALD told the. _— 7 ; : group it was urgent that he visit Cuba and the - : Cuban Embassy denied him a visa. He requested aid from CONTRERAS group. CONTRERAS and others mistrusted OSWALD because they felt he was a CIA provocation. The group allowed OSWALD to -accompany them the rest of that day, that night and part of the next day. OSWALD was very a introverted and appeared to.be slightly crazy. . OSWALD made no mention of an_ assassination plot but kept bringing up the emake point he had to a a travel to Cuba immediately. Tie SNe Renny 7: Sea HS et Ne
14-00000 " ‘the University, csthe ‘credibility of. ‘his aécdunti” ¢ OSWALD! s Spanish, which: was” barely" adequate to get. him meals. near. dn hotel, ‘*e seems hardly Likely to. have permitted him to: carry’ ‘on for an extended period. ' . : At this point, with ©Bt knowledge, the matter was tired zt aver to the Mexic¢an authorities who determined that CONTRERAS wag ‘indeed at the University of Mexico but only for the years 1959 < 1960 and that he had been publically 255g ) in- protest activity for the Student Revolutionary Bloc (BER) in January 1961. However, the group “ceased. functioning ag such in the ‘middle of 1962 and Oscar CONTRERAS, was never = one of its leaders. _No further work is reflected in’ ‘the files ‘on the CONTRERAS allegations. Apart. ‘from SU the unsustained claims. made by CONTRERAS about his own presence at. ‘there ‘is ‘an additional eleménts ‘that undérinines: soe foo . te mae ¥. with a& ‘University student’ group.