datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(404-10106-10768 7 . at f&-6” on : 2 eo, ~ 20 November 1967. SUBJECT: STERN, Biith (See SHAW, Clay L.) ALLEGATION: CIA CONNECTION: — Clay SHAW atten‘ted a NORE. However, husband, Edgar B. black-tie party given by STERN, was granted a covert clearan an old friend, Edith STERN, Jamary 1953{ “4; at her palatial home on This clearance Gerden Lane, New Orleens. was cance ember 1956. Subject*s son, Philip Maurice STERE, was granted a liaison clearance in SOURCE: March 1961 when he wes employed by State Department as Deputy Assistant STATES-ITEM article Secretary of State for Public Affairs. by Thomas GRIFFIN deted li October 1967. OS INDICES RESULTS: Tae file on Subject‘s husband Bigar B STERN, reflects that Subject is the daughter of one of the principal stockholders of Sears end Robuck Company and inherited several million dollars from her. father's estate. Subject's deceased sister, Marion Rosenwald STERR, had been married to Alfred K. STERN who fled behind the Iron Curtein from Mexieo in 1957 with hig second wife, Martha DODD STERN. Subject's son, Philip M. STERN, is a former owner of the Northern Vircinia Sun. In 1961 Phflip M. STERN wos named as one of & “board of advisors” to Bubert HUMPHREY. ; ; In June 1967, the Office of Security wee advised by Mr. GOODWIN's office (Assistant to the DCI), that a Mrs. BULLER hed called the Azency on behsl? of Philip STERN, a writer, to request 6 copy of the current security jvestionnzire which is used for new epplicants te CIA. Mrs. SULLER -lse said that Mr. STERW wos “doing a piece on security" and had obtcined a copy of the secrecy form used by the State Nepartment an’ wishe: to have a copy of the CIA form. Mr, GOODWIN explaine3 to ire. PULLER that CIA hes no stanésré form; it vuries on an individual busis depending on the employees duties. OF adévisel Office of Security, Dep:rtrent of Stete (hr. GENTELE) of Mrs. BULLER's clsim that lr. STERN had obtained = copy of the State Depertnent secrecy form for the yurpose of publicetion. RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only [Do Not Reproduce GROG § -Excieded from axterati owarrsding ond declassifteation SECRET
Me ae @ annette ean emma \ . ~ Close SHAY Vo other informtion is eyellsble concernin: Cley SHAW's relationship to E\ith STERN ctber thon the brict erticle in the ITY of LL October 1057. PPR ATRIA STALLS tl ae | é peg | Pry omemen H
14-00000 OGC 77-0427 19 January 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM: Edmund Cohen Assistant General Counsel SUBJECT: -- Involvement as Witness in éra atric émming Case 1. In the late afternoon on 7 January 1977, Me informed the undersigned that he was being asked to apres: conference on 10 January in Miami, Florida, and expected to be a witness overnment in the case against Gerald Patrick Hemming. Mr. 0 ated that he had been under cover while employed by the Agency rom to 1974. He ransferred to DEA where he became involved with Mr. Hemming. fe now back with the Agency and expected to be put under cover Véry Shortly. Both for cover considerations and because he felt the Hemming case had a great deal of "flap" potential, rivaling the Werbell case, he desired OGC to intercede for him to keep him from having to testify. 2. Mr. hoted that Hemming was a "walk-in", who was referred to his boss at’ ; Mr. Conein, by Mr. Werbell and that Conein, in turn, had sent Hemming to him to be interviewed. Subsequently, Mr. Hemming had “set up" Mr. Conein by first telling him that a brother wished to work with DEA and requesting permission to give Mr. Conein a resume, and later by publicly meeting Conein and handing him a manila envelope ostensibly containing the promised resume. In fact, the envelope contained a report with phony cryptonyms representing Hemming as an agent of Conein's. Hemming's report detailed a variety of alleged official activities an mentioned his prior contacts with Conein and wit ndicated that Hemming would undoubtedly try to beat the nding against him in Miami by claiming to be a DEA or CIA agent? testimony that he was a DEA employee when he met him but was'a CIA employee both before and after would help cloud the issue. In addition, such exposure could affec current usefulness to the Agency.
[4 Wt6 Sopenpe = dave Sheree oh ne Q de Be Bortearse A be pandalh hd, Vile Pereeeny pate , MFR wm QA ke qb Sqde WP Ter Sharmse 30S 350 $449 Truk 2 Ss Oef | gg, Ce Shere crt) 9 eohedile fe aie ASO = WP ese tl th i hee shed ala Sv. Il Spee ony cu, W/o re ls FY ieiremes LAr on cont # f Ley rene Drriph nls 4 bof Swank lh hiv 2 reeds us alien, al pba case Hoke $y bh Aw) Cw he onde ES 7 Mp , pias artne 2 gp \ phhe Lrptine mm Modding 2» Anicfe- Led of Baten ‘gan aie fA CARS he! [fo 9% 9 ae I wht ~ CARS Uf fi moe Sf
Coevala RP. ewcng) Us. vs Hing ___Caae Ne a ocean CA ete fet i — ee eee — a aero ae ee os t “ a ee t
_ S24 Elevida en ah oy : Rew dan Va. 92090
ee ER ET ae 7 in, “Od gs — ze - | Lewd >) fled deo fem abd Van OA hQ 3 ¢ ~ ton (16) Gk) 3mm 18g Ve ay he IO vn Sed pole he eee say] oy Us ~
s pra amrears cacnns eule acr ct Bre rears caartiias ie ani Tae
(oa-07-0009| # - ot wo 4p! _ bese Ur) URELASSIFIES earn ntmoy i ie 6 ADO STTONONED, OH OTA lA « SUBJECT: (Optional) - ™ —— . ee EE | Appearance of| As Witness In Behalf of US Govt “FROM: 2 ; : a ~ [EXTENSION NO. rr ae E/X/LA . a +-7< nn 1 March 1977 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE “RECEIVED . | FORWARDED OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom ta whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) a Moo ' C/SE/X/LA ie No. 6 - 7 - 8 : Copies provided FYI ’ C/SE/XO RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only. SE Security Officer Z _ _ Do Not Reproduce ces/ocs OGC 7024 (E. Cohen) OS/EAB SE/X/LA OF. 5B29 | | : i EE A I LDR BREEDER TOS HOT take MARC NOY S52 7 RO METH SU EDO NOUS HPN EE REORENE EE MIRC CNMI aah ge WA we ma Ba Re ORERRUN A NeTT bR EMERETITIIN mle A Rta FORM G USE PR REVIOUS on on gh ety mam — eengyt eye ree ; er, INTERNAL
14-00000 28 February 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, SE Division ATTENTION — ; Division Security Officer zc OF. FROM | 7 D SUBJECT : Appearance As Witness In Behalf of the . United States Government REFERENCES > A. Memorandum For Chief, SE Division, © ‘From dated 11 January. 1977 ,~Same Subject 03 B. USA v. Gerald P. Hemming, Et Al..- (76-371-CR-CA) 1. As reported in Paragraph 4 of Reference A, the trial of Gerald P. Hemming (Reference B) was severed on 10 January ©1977. I was informed of the severance during my pre-trial conference with AUSA Karen Atkinson in Miami, Florida on that’ same day. AUSA Atkinson told me I could return to Washington, D.C. and she would have the Drug Enforcement Administration Miami Regional Office inform me if and when the trial was rescheduled. I orally reported the above to Mr. Billy Hix, SE Division Security Officer, Ms?i* | Acting Chief SE/X/LA, and Mr. Robert Blandford,” ; » Upon my return to Headquarters on 11 January 1977. I also forwarded Reference A copies to Office of Security, External Activities Branch and the Office of General Counsel, Mr. Edmund Cohen. 2. On 28 February 1977 I was contacted by SA Robert Fredericks of the DEA Miami Regional Office and informed that’ the Hemming trial was scheduled to begin 2 March 1977. SA Fredericks asked me to be on standby to travel to Miami to appear as a witness on behalf of the United States Government. SA Fredericks said it was not certain the trial would begin
14-00000 on 2 March and he did not know whether I would be needed as a witness, 3. -I requested that SA Fredericks initiate action to authorize me to travel to Miami via GTR issued by DEA. SA Fredericks said he would initiate that action. I am awaiting further notice from SA Fredericks. eo 93 cc- SED, Security Officer CCS/OCS OS/EAB OGC TF ? t Z y % a maf
404-10107-10028) ra TE Ee oe SEGRE: ( 7-13-77, 9 July 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT : Glazunov: Declassification of Nosenko Reporting REFERENCE: Chief, CI Memorandum for the Record, 2 July 1976, Subject: Meeting with Mr. Donald Jameson 1. In accordance with paragraph 3 of reference, I reviewed the original Nosenko transcripts and handwritten notes regarding Ilya S. Glazunov for the purpose of declas- sifying certain information to be used by Mr. Donald Jameson. Nosenko's comments concerning Glazunov were summarized in a blind memorandum attached t 6/177, 3 July 1976, which was prepared for passage to Paragraph 1 of that @4 blind memorandum has been declassified on the authority of Chief, Counterintelligence Staff. The substance of that ‘paragraph which has been declassified is marked by red brackets. The specific identification of the source of information as Nosenko has not been declassified, and thus any use of it in accordance with the purpose outlined in reference cannot identify Nosenko as the specific source. ; A copy of the blind memorandum is attached to this memorandum ' for the record. 2. For future reference, the declassification of para- graph 1 of the blind memorandum cited above is limited only to that portion of the paragraph so bracketed, and the declassification does not extend to the original Nosenko transcripts, handwritten notes, or other Nosenko-sourced information upon which the blind memorandum was based. signe RETURNTO CIA “DU7CI/REA De Net Repredtiés E2 .IMPDET CL BY 063926 ~ SECRET 2/6
“a (ATG) WaCLASSUFLED cy “Wy | aI on IAL ~ = ([] “SECRET ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET OGC Subject: HERLIHY, Lt. Col. William f. Yanan s | TO: (Officer designation, room number, and | ate building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom See INITIALS te whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) RECEIVED FORWARDED im Coot ed edlin To | Gla fi Po (OP. | Lop 34) ada “Laem | J, ) gtd PH K (LO Ks £ = _ me i O “Ht ° F z fore 610 ENE (] SECRET © {CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL =] UNCLASSIFIED wwe Eke
14-00000 MERE EA AR é Ris sug wa ig DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY PERSONNEL SECURITY GROUP FORT HOLABIRD, MARYLAND 21219 pet 29 1369 USAPSG MEMORANDUM FOR: OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR PLANS, CIA ATTENTION: Mr. James Ludlum DPOB: | rr © 7. 1, Proceedings are currently underway to eliminate SUBJECT from the U. S, Army on grounds of unsuitability under the provisions of AR 635-105, To substantiate a portion of the case against SUBJECT it may become necessary to show that during 1967 and 1968 HE was not in the employ of your agency in any manner, In this connection request you advise USAPSG if your agency objects to the release of the attached DA Form 341 (Agent Report), subject as above, dated 21 June 1968, to SUBJECT, HIS defense counsel, and the members of the board, subject to dissemination restrictions imposed by the fact that the report contains classified defense information. 2. Should your agency object to release of the particular information included in the cited report, a letter from your agency stating that SUBJECT was not in your employ, in any manner, while assigned to Supreme Headquarters, Allied Powers Europe, would be equally sufficient. 3. *Fot your information, the board hearing at which this information is des{red to be used will be closed to the public and the press. J B/FINNEG | COL II Chief, United States Army Personnel Security Group 1 Incl as T0 BE REG SO: inl SEPARATED FROM CL 3 This docunent will then be marked ¢
14-00000 Ele, ho AGENT REPORT te (SR 380+320-10), 1. NAME OF SUBUECT OR THTLE OF INCIDENT — , (HERLIHY, William Joseph PLTC, 064-739 (DPOB: 13 Avgust 1929, Pittsburgh, Pa. 2+ DATE SUBMITTED 21. June 1968 35 CONTROL SYMBOL OR FILE NUMBER Le. REPORT OF FINDINGS a Ke (LOCAL AGENCY) On 20 Jun 968, therChief of Station, iCentral Intelligence Agency (CIA), stated that iWilliam ‘Joseph HERLIHY was known to him and that HERLIHY was not yar emplovee of the CIA and further that SUBJECT was not involved fin any type of clandestine or covert mission or operation for the iCI£. Source stated that HERLIHY had not been associated with the fCIA at any time during HIS assignment at Supreme Headquarters [Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE). Source had no knowledge of any pre- lvious association that HERLIHY may have had with CIA, or a 7 SPECIAL HANDLING REQUIRED, Ko? RELEASABLE 70 FOREIGN NATIONALS: . _DOWNGRADED AT 12 YEAR INTERVALS; NOT A UTORMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED. DOD DIR $200.10 : fea "HR Fa CONF Ni i ; is. TYPED NAME AND ORGANIZATION OF SPFOIAL AGENT ; 16. SYBNATURE OF SB y ] I" T4M E, BREESE, JR., 650th MI Det| / / ( YN. Qo Lt | DAL, 341 O ~ 466:
404-10107-10059 “é >: . . Ae a — 9@e 76-57! ~ RETURNTO CIA aro Background Use Only “ Do Not Reproduce 7 October 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division ATTENTION ~~: Mr, Rod Brooks | FROM = sr doa E. Keys, Chief ' Corporate Cover Branch Central Cover Staf¢ SUBJECT : Request for Letter of Agreement OF 4, Please prepare a Letter of Agreement between the Age & GQBBLUE, which,.through the President of the firm, Mar. ( has agreed to place on retainer a Contract Agent of Europe Division, ov COPHONE/1. John J. Murray, Jr. represented the Agancy fn these negotiations. Identities will be forwarded under separate cover. . . oy a o2, 2. Effective 1 October 1976, (LBBLUE will place on retainer (TOPHONE/I at an annual retainer of2$9,000, which will be paid to him in monthly increments of $750 by(LBBLUE. The Company will overtly negotiate a retainer contract with, COPHONE, which will make eminently clear that both are negotiating and on luding the contract as independent parties; that the Company, LUE, will have no obifgation to withhold Federal, or state Income taxes, or Social Security taxes. ve 3. In consideration of the support rendered, the Agency wil] pay(L. LUE $10,000 annually. Provision. ts made in “his amouirt to offset any nominal expenses the firm incurs in its overt associations or Support of MOPHONE/1. It also serves, in part, to minimize the chances that duditing personnel will ,identify a wash transfer between .the notional facility and payments to CIOVHONE/1. . 0% . - 4. The Agency will reimburse(1 BBLUE in gu rterly increments via a contrived contractual arrangement betwee PBLUE and a notional facility of the Agency. Cancelled checks will serve as adequate accountings for monies paid(LBBLUE. i “0% 5. Please include the usual paragraphs of appreciation, secrecy, and prohibition of bona fide employment. ° 6. All information relating to this agreement js classified . secret. Both the Agency and the Company agree that the most stringent Safeguards will be taken to protect this information, including the E~2 INPDET CL BY 055087 WARMING NOTICE
14-00000 . &, be given to a third party by efther the Agency or the Company will] be done in strict conformance to the laws safeguarding national . “existence of the agreement. Any information in any fori that must security information, and only with full consul tation between the on oe -Ageney and the Company. ; ~2- SECRET ~ os oars
(fowtoro7-40069] . [MESSAGE FORM TOTAL COPIES: Y 7 ne ‘Veken RETURN TO-CIA _ Background Use'Only: _ Do Not t Reproduce, : . SeCuR RISK, WE ARE, THEREFORE, ‘PROCEEDING “TO DEVELOP ‘SUFTABLE COVER, AND WILL TRAIN HIM, 10: ASSIST IN, PREPARING COORDINATING OFFICERS.“ RELEASING OFFICER . - | fxcluded free automatic —— L_ senses] EEE) none apd 7. REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED... === Gory No. oS Ow ee,
‘404-10107-10085 rye bor CAs? * . _ RETURNTO CIA : Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce y? Y 2 February 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of the General Counsel VIA >: Chief, Central Cover Staff INFO > Mr. Rocea, CI Starr SUBJECT : | | The Itkin Case 1. At our meeting on 30 January 1969, certain additional questions were raised relative to the relationship between[ ana Itkin. of did (ZBELOBE pecome aware that Itkin and the had approache with a proposal to represent loWe were advised in 1666 through case officer ae meetings with that he had been developing some potential cover company businéss with interests from the United States and England. We were given the name of veal F later than 27 October 1966. We cannot say thav-we-tnen knew 7 2 individual names of those involved. It was not uncommon for a4 At the 30 January meeting, we were also asked certain 08 questions about § financial involvement with the he and Itkin has be@A with prior to(_passociatio with the Agency. ; 2. We can add nothing tof 7 account of January 1968 reflecting that he entered into an agreement with the firm on 31 May 1961 wherein he was — authorized leave of absence from 1 June 1961 to 31 May 1963 drawing $100.00 per week for that period. 9) lef, CCS(LBGLOBE oe
(404-10107-10086 3 ARP RETURN TO CIA 30 January 1969 Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce MEMORANDUM . oS SUBJECT : ( 1, Mr, Papich communicated by telephone at 10:00 a.m.: The New York office of the FBI has learned informally from an Assistant District Attorney (unidentified) on Hogan's staff that the New York District Attorney has received a complaint | against Subject for absconding with funds received from negligence cases. The allegation is that Subject converted the settlements to his own use, did not pay them-~-less his own fees--to the clients concerned, The complainant or complainants and the lawyer or spokesman for them are not identified. Itis added, however, that whoever made the com- | plaint to the New York District Attorney aleo | specified that there was reason to believe that Subject was connected with a U.S. Agency. Lf this was so, it was further indicated, complainants would be willing to discuss the situation. 2. These are all of the details that Sam has received over the | telephone from New York, I asked him specifically for the identification-- if the FBI could make it--of the attorney or attorneys who made the | complaint to the New York District Attorney's office. 3. There was nothing in this communication to relate Subject's case with the Itkin matter. However, it is clear that the allegation made against Subject is identical with a large mumber that have been of interest to the New York District Attorney in connection with Itkin, Raymond G. Roeca C/CI/R&A
(404-10107-10087 eg o, 2\pd OGC 69~0402 4 March 1969 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 1, I showed Mr. George Carey his memorandum of 1955 to the Director referring to T. and H., and said we thought that H. referred to a General Hardin. After considerable speculation Mr. Carey finally placed T. as being Juan Trippe and Hardin as an Air Force General who was being placed with for operational reasons, primarily technical information collection. Independently Mrs. Lovejoy had checked with Mr. Larocque, and he also recalled General Hardin was a man Mr. Carey was interested in placing a for operational reasons. 2. The Air Force Register lists a General Thomas O. Hardin, Air Force Major General, who retired in 1955, which would seem to fit in as he is listed as an airline executive. Mr. Carey had no knowledge whatsoever of the Itkin case, and we felt it was out of the question that General Hardin is synonymous with Philip Harbin. fh Pit - LAWRENCE R. HOUSTON General Counsel OGC:LRH:bt 1-C/CI/R&A 1-DCS 2-General Counsel ghrone Wubject HERBERT ITKIN
Pa DUTEOING“ELEPOUCH:*. : ~ . eo 4p ena cenren "eS ‘ony 8 ( |). SES er a. sere \3 won Onc noes ; | G eae ror - are eet By | . TO: i Is ECRE T , TELEPOUCH ' ‘DISP NO: (rand-0n28 . RETURN TO CIA DATE? Lb NOVENBER 1973, ,, Background Use Only E SECRET . _____9GC. GC. SURI: ITKIN, HERBERT) | | i I | Do Not Reproduce ! t . TO: CHIEF OF BASE.(_—*OD CHIEF OF STATION.[ 3-4 ii FROM: CHIEF. EAST ASIA DIVISION / i) SUBJECT: MR. HERBERT. ITKIN eR Fo AMG FYI ONLY? 0% . ia nn wid: ||: aie geiethete-ON:. by NOVENBER-2973 R= 1 } IN WASHING TON. HAND CARRIED TO H@S A LETTER FROM AUSTRALIAN EJUSTICE A. R. NOFF-. ITT REQUESTING INFORMATION Of THE RELTASILITY OF NR. HERECRT ITKIN WHCR HE DESCRIBED AS A FORMER CIA AND FEE EMPLOYEE. THe FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS ARE THE GIST OF MR. MOFFITT'S LETTER. WHICH YAS ARDRESSER ETO “AR. WILLIAM CROSBY". {SIC} DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGEUCE: 3. A. MCFFITT HOLDS A COMMISSION TO INQUIRE INTS TRE INFIL- 2 TRATION OF ORGANIZED CRIME IKTO NEW SOUTH WALES. IT IS OF SuSSTANTTL. i IMPORTANCE TO HIS INCUIRY THAT HE CONSIDER EVIDENCE GIVEN SURING A iP USE ONLY . RELEASING OFFICER 6 P | enoss —
14-00000 re er ne ee a Se ee _ 7 TELEPOUCH —_~ ee . z : _ —— a Omen > , oo E 2  IMPDET o w mass ; | cL BY: 034805 COURT CASE IN ENGLAND ZN VULY 1944 ey Tk. B. IN HIS TESTIMONY IN ENGLAND MR. ITKIN CLAIMED TO HAVE. BEEN RECRUITED BY CIA IN AN “UNBDERCOVER CAPACITY” IN ABOUT 2954. HE CLAIMED HE WAS WITH THE C.I-A- UNTIL MARCH 19b3 AT WHICH TINE BY SOME ARRANGEMENT HE WORKED FOR GOTH THE FBI AND CIA. UNTIL JANUARY 1566. C. WOFFITT ASKS FOR INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF MR. ITKIN - DURING THE YEARS LILY TO L9L9 AND FOR COPIES OF “ANY RELEVANT AFFI- DAVITS OF PERSONS IN AUTHORETYAIN THE. FBI OR CIA USED IN’ PROCEEDINGS IN USA.” ETN : jogs. ¢. Dev MOFFITT NOTED THAT IN THE INTERESTS, OF PRIVACY-HE ROUT- ED HIS LETTER VIA THE AUSTRALIAR-DZPLONATIC POUCH, AND ASKER THAT THE | REPLY GE RETURNED TO HIM BY THE AUSTRALIAN ENBASSY IN UASHINGTON. 2. MR. MOFFITT'S REQUEST UAS HANELESD BY THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNCIL {66C} WHO MADE AVAILABLE FOR MR. MOFFETT COPIES OF THREE AFFIDAVITS {ALL OF WICH IN PUSLIC DOMAIN? RELEVANT TO HERBERT ITKIN ZAND HIS AFFILIATION WITH THE CIA. O6C CONCLUDED THEIR REPLY EY SAY- PING THAT HERBERT ITKIN FURNISHED INFORMATION To THE CEA OVER A PERTOR a 2 OF MANY YEARS. BUT THAT HE WAS NOT SERT TO ENGLAND TO COLLECT ANY ° ‘sree apnea a aes RELEASING OFFICER Pa a Poe NUMBER
14-00000 0) evune vo. a E 2  IMPDET O wens CL BY: 0344g5 INFORMATION FOR CTA AND'HE DID NOT FURNISH THE CEA UYTH ANY ENFORRAS— | TION BHILE HE WAS IN ENGLAND. 3-  OGC'S REPLY WAS SENT TO MR. MOFFITT IN THE SAME CHANNELS HIS | REQUEST CAME IN. Hes POUCHING COPIES AFFADAVITS, BOTH LETTERS.. ‘U/S/CB VIA PoucH . Ee IMPDET-d COORDINATING OFMCERS OGC MR. GREARY <IK DRAFT} TNR. ROCCA CER DRAFT} _ IP USE ONLY “ THEODORE 6G. SHACKLEY, C/EA RELEASING OFFICER CROSS RErEnence REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED