180-10140-10182) . | oa 4 ~ 4 rie 4 at : e g : 7% . LOUIS STONLS, OMIO, CHAINMAN nN a 3 Pee a RIGHAT I SOr PRETEE, MLC. SAPUEL &. DEVINE, OFF bs bo Ee fo: : Sas Va a WALTER E. RetintRo | Bc STEWART WD, 840. HIF ice, CONH, Seman won , oe ee YVOLNE aR? THWAITE ake, CALIF. CHARLES THOME, NEBR, "CMTEcyOritiet J. DODD, GONN. HAROLD &. SAWYER, MICH. See rarstan IND. Epelect Committee ot Assagsinattaris ! ROUCAT WL LOGAR, PA. —_— 7 . . . st | 4 wk" U : (02) 225-4628 UG. Gouge of Srepresentalives 2331 HOUSE OFFICE BINLDING, ANNEX 2 ¢ | WASHINGTON, D.C. 26518 August 28, 1978 ‘ “P ‘ fv a7 ang ¥ Al 2 SE Qt pT" SE Mr. Scott Breckinridge heck he wy OC ® Chief Coordinator, HSCA Heorgs or Office of Legislative Counsel Brut Solus ~ ec Central Intelligence Agency . fn kt Stolen anette ~ pes hoe Washington, D. C. 20505 Nerbsrt ante Gee seoll Tyre a Dear Mr. Breckinridge: joee - 05 In accordance with Professor Blakey's discussion with you last week, and in keeping with the timetable proposed at that time, the following interrogatories are submitted for your consideration. 1. Enumerate the name of any drug given to ra Eyug IE Nosenko and the date it was administered -- “ihe Cota % including those given for "therapeutic" pur- Oe poses -- from January 1964 to 1968. 2. Describe in detail Nosenko's living condi- tions from April 4, 1964 through 1968. The description should include, but not be limited to the following: eS a. where he lived i b. the degree to which his movements \ were restricted ' c. his contact with other people d. his access to radio, television and reading materials such as newspapers and books e. the degree to which his actions were N "observed" aay fe restrictions with regard to his food wo intake 7 3. Define Nosenko's present and past employment ox fol arrangements with the central Intelligence Agency. 140-7 (6/8 2
| eS ; Oo a Mr. Scott Breckinridae | Page 2 Include: a. the dates and nature of his employment b. the services rendered by Nosenko c. itemized accounting of all compensation . received by Nosenko Sgt an account of the roles of Richard Helms “< and John McCone in authorizing Nosenko's employment and. compensation arrangements with the CIA . <é / 4. On what dates and for how long was Noséenko aa ci/es questioned by the CIA about Lee Harvey Oswald -~ from 1964 to present. we “Tht Ci 5. When Nosenko was questioned by the CIA about hy Se eee be ° . o te Lee Harvey Oswald, who did the questioning. 6. What background, if any, did the interrogator CE ct. have in interrogations. - What knowledge did the a) interrogator have with respect to Oswald's back- ground. , ae 7. On the dates that Nosenko was questioned about “ Oswald does there now exist or did there ever exist: a. a tape of the questions asked and Nosenko's answers b. a transcript of the questions asked and a Nosenko's answers c. a summary of the guestions asked and Nosenko's answers e3PS gg. What criteria, if any, was used to determine: a. what subjects to question Nosenko about b. how much time to devote to each subject 9. What significance -- with respect to possible foreign involvement in. the assassination as well ,\ as to the issue of Nosenko's bonafides -- did the CIA attach during the years 1964-1968 to No- 4 senko's statements about. Qswald? ar, 10. What significance -- with respect to possible foreign involvement in the assassination as well } as to the issue of Nosenko's bonafides -~- does ' the CIA attach today to Nosenko's statements about Oswald?
en _Mr. Scott Breckinridge i Page 3 “ll. If the answer to question 9 is different from the response to question 10, when did the change occur and why? ‘ 12. What was the CIA's position from 1964 to AW) 1968 on the question of whether Nosenko is bonafide? / fy . ara 13. What is the CIA's position today on the “\ question of whether Nosenko is bonafide? | a 14. %&If the answer to question 12 is different from the response to question 13, when did the change occur and why? 15. What was the CIA's position from 1964 to 1968 on whether Nosenko was telling the truth in the statements he made to. the CIA about Oswald? 16. What is the CIA's position today as to whether Of fee Nosenko was telling the truth in the statements he made to the CIA about Oswald? 17. If the answer to question 15 is different from jd " the response to guestion 16, when did the change eptietd Occur and why? ps Lr ee - 18. Why were three polygraph tests given to Nosenko? gr 19, What is the CIA's.position with regard to the , validity of each of the three polygraph tests ad- fx ministered to Nosenko? . 20. Why was Nosenko asked numerous questions per- taining to Oswald on his 1966 polygraph test and ay only asked two questions about Oswald on his 1968 © test? 21. Who authorized Bruce Solie to reinvestigate , Nosenko's bonafides? 22. Why was Nosenko's bonafides reinvestigated in uS 1968? \ 23. Did either the FBI or the CIA have primary re- gS sponsibility for investigating Nosenko's statements
Mr. Scott Breckinridge Page 4 GC . w_, about Oswald? If neither had primary responsibility, Re eas there any division of responsibility? \ . 2) af ° 24. What communication, if any, existed between the we N . : Ay FBI and CIA with respect to evaluating and/or in- « _ vestigating Nosenko's statements about Oswald? a ky Thank you for your continued’ cooperation. a Sincerely, Wwe Q dO . A Oyo! BAAR G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director GRB:kkr Phir Wt pbed tra.