"Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 Usc 2107 Hote). i we DATE: 11-14-2017 - JFK Assassination System Date: 4/9/2015 ' Identification Form Agency Information . “AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-10325-10315 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: . 62-80750-4030 Document Information ~ ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: WANNALL TO: SULLIVAN TITLE: t DATE: 11/13/1962 PAGES: 2 SUBJECTS : CIA LIAISON FILE DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret : RESTRICTIONS: 1B;1C CURRENT STATUS: — Redact DATE OF LASTREVIEW: 01/21/1999 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : - TT TT Nr v9.1 - 9 : Docld: 32313066 Page 1
Released undef the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Hote DATE: 11-14-2017 OPTIONAL FORM, NO. 10 '? | ‘ne . tle UNITED STATES GOVERN NT. - “Fi ha. 8 e, * he Mohr Casper Memorandum  acanc ” ze. DeLoac ro: W. C. Sullivan’ pare: 11/13/62 CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO _- 1 = Belmont PECLASSIFICATIONGARRE, | | - Belmont —pELEASE OF Gi INFORMAT! FROM: W. R. Wannall 1-- Sullivan Wain ER ff a ),.3 | we 1 - Wannal] —{W THIS DOCUMERL Zp supject: GIA, OPERATIONS IN MIAMI i - Papich >. grr, ; Reference is made-to Miami. letter dated 11/2/62 setting forth the results of aneeting which our Miami Office held with — Mr. Theodore Shackley, CIA official in charge of that Agency's erations in Miami. This meeting. dealt with the case entitled 7 "Alwin Odio Tanayo, jInternal Security - Cuba." (Odio jis the Cuban CS double agent who was turned over to us by CIA. ing this meeting _ Shackley presented his Agency's position with regard to future coordination between FBI-and CIA and particularly made: a point that his Agency intended to run certain types of double agent operations. in this country. On 11/8/62 Agent: Papich contacted Victor John Wallen, CIA, and directed his attention to the statements attributed to Shackley. Wallen was told that the Bureau was not obligated under any directive or agreement to keep CIA advised on a current and continuing basi of all developments in the[Odio|case; that we did not have eneCs') responsibility of keeping CIA informed regarding any requests. for a_ articular type of information which the subject might receive from~ is superiors; and that the Bureau was.not obligated. to clear ‘anything submi tted by Odio|for transmittal to his superiors, Since there was cs a welleestabrishted interagency mechanism (U. S. Evaluation Board) for handling such clearances. Wallen was further advised: that Shackley's intention to run Cuban agents in the United States would be..considered ‘a Serious infringement of clear-cut FBI. jurisdiction. It was pointed out: that Shackley*s intention was at variance with long-established 7) policy“and: understanding between the FBI and CIA since CIA‘is é obliged=to immediately advise: us when-information is received concerning agefits operating in this country. . Concerning Bureau's responsibilities to, keep CIA advised, the Liaison Agent informed Wallen that we recognized CIA interests in Cuba and we would ‘make available to that Agency all pertinent information developed which might have a bearing on CIA interests. This could include leads for CIA and could be information which | — might be of :aSsistance’to that Agency in directing its program against the Castro Government. * Wok Git 1 - (105-115537- oad Ry wer g. Enclosures « A A CPR. TAINED. SSIPIED px ERWISE. TION con 5 UNCUA bn na iN OT ALL INFOR, HEREIN WHERE Syo9; perme SECRET f ul 53 Nov 21 19 pects on 2c ‘ Docld:32313066 Page 2