/ FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56) Oe \ . J 4 DO FBI Date: 5/27/64 Transmit the following in (Type in plain text or code) Via AIRTEL | (Priority or Method of Mailing) { — ee ee EE LoL LL 28349 TO: Director, FBI (92-20839) FROM: SAC, Phitageypnia (92-441) (P) SUBJECT: RUSSELL A. BUFALINO, aka AR (00: Philadelphia ) Re Philadelphia airtels 5/20/64 and ah and Bureau airtel 5/26/64. Philadelphia airtel 5/20/64 recommended that results of interview with SUE NICHOLS be furnished to INS. h e recommendation was made the subject's paramour, (PH 665-C-TE), stated she had no intention | = fying at INS hearing of subject. Since that time, however,[____Jhas decided to be a cooperative witness for INS after consulting her attorney, CARLON O! cranton, Pa., and INS attorney VINCENT, SCHIANO. | stated that SCHIANO has told her that fr she cooperates he would limit the questions asked of he would ask only those questions approved by her attorne In general, the questions asked would concern her relationship with subject but no specific questions wuld be asked b concerning the exact nature of the intimacy petween[o and the subject. In addition, [|__|] would be asked concerning her relationship with attorney REMO ALLIO. ALLIO has already testified at INS hearing that he was[___] attorney and re- fused to answer questions concerning his contach with p PL 3 72 gy 283 SD. 9 £2 A: \3h- Bureau (92- ) :9h 2 - Philadelphia (92-441) ot FTH:mab Bet q MAY 28 1964 C koprdve Vee mes Sent _____sssss M~—CO~Per a \ P56 hr 1 51968 “Agent in Charge NW 45739 DociId:3256502i Page i
NW 45739 PH 92-441. [___|denies that ALLIO was her attorney. gave $40,000 to ALLIO, ostensibly as an in- vestment in Monet Fashions, which company ceased to operate after she received only $3,000 of her original investment. INS has indicated that ALLIO never invested this money in Monet Fashions and funneled it off, probably to the subject. fears widespread publicity if she invokes the 5th Améndment at INS hearing and is willing to cooperate with INS if the questions asked of her are restricted. does not want it known that ce has been an informant ‘for the FBI. a former PCI of this office and an employee of expected to lay groundwork ‘for testimony of -E testifying concerning nights spent by subject at home at Lake Ariel, Pa. It is not recommended that INS be furnished the details of the interviews conducted with SUHNICHOLS, because if this is done it will set a preceden®é for possible demand for information furnished Bureau by[_] and . [___] has been most cooperative and voluminous information has been furnished by her to this office. [__] did furnish some information in the past concerning Subject's relationship with] ana this information was reported under confidential symbolin Philadelphia reports con- cerning the subject. The interview of OLIVER TROUP, SR., which was fur-~ nished to INS and to the attorney for subject by INS, was in the form of a signed statement and was not given to the Bureau_in confidential c assification as was the information Every step will be taken to protect the confidential relationship between[_ and the Bureau. If a | is made at ring for information furnished by[_____Jand eel the confidentdal DocId:3256502i Page 2 OTHER 4