{41010640987 were Tap Ne yeeterr en rane Mee a ge SQ a Gp . TO; bullding) FORM 3~62 . (OfRce: 610“ ' URSSASSIFIED E PREVIOUS EDITIONS C) IN” “NAL US. NL. 1 designation, room number; and ft Tf SECRET © (C] CONFIDENTIAL [7] INTERNAL some : whean oe OY Hd43 C1 coneir ty Ey secner ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET OGC Subject: ITKIN, HERBERT 15 June 1970 COMMENTS {Number each comment’ to,” to > Draw a line across column after each. comment.) he ‘cable you have alr eady seen, ureau's London. répresenta- | [-] UNCLASSIFIED wae ate
~ ae e 2 a oe SONS ; nome ye ee . = F CLASSIFICATION PROCESSING ACTION : ad i 5 PAT C ti SECRET/RYBAT P| MARKTD FOR INOEXING | . ea { 10 . . . ? Chief, European Divis ion NO INDEXING REQUIRED | info, ONLY QUALIFEO CESK Chief, WOMUSE CAN JUDGE INDEXING ft FROM Chief, of Station, po MAICROFIUA SuBIECT RYBAT/KEYWAY =~ Mr. Herbert Itkin _ ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES DIRECTOR 037202 Attached herewith is the Memorandum of Record for "encanto tenet tne Prt Ant ernestinanie tre WOMUSE files as requested in reference, John L, LAUTERBACH Attachment: H/W As Stated i Distribution: 3 = EUR w/att 2 - WOMUSE w/att ae a ee ee Pete a ee Ne a er atte rn | | tos wavvaanct 10 DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER GELT12,734 29 May 1970 CLASSIFICATION HGS FILE NUMBER SECRET/RYBAT un
yo OYE 724-1013 "aD May 1970 SUBJECT: London LNERGO Handling of Mr. Herbert Itkin REF 6: DIRECTOR 097202 — I was called te (sora) GHUPROOT eguive! ent of C/WH who aleo acts as SELANCE liaison eontrelefficer) on 18 may 1970. GHUPROOT)¢/ asked whether an article which hed appeared in ender SeCHEED 38 16 May toe effect that itkin was on 2 SREAECE secret : Britain in 1965, was accurate.’ <r expected to be questioned by the British FCO on this. Because I was unfamiliar with the background of the I ease, I agreed to ascertain the facts and come back to with the ansver. 7 2.) Before sending ny query ‘to: Headquarters (see 1613, I questioned the leeal Chief, LNERGO, Be said he was ete. om “SF jer - surprised at the press assertions that Itkin hed any consection with JELANCE at the time he was in London in 1066.. Be said that he personally had handled Itkin here in connection with a criminal lavestigatt en. wae at fivat pot tole about the local LNERGO/Ithkin relatidnship, but Aa eha: its of Itkin's collaberation. Subsequently#! GA lwas able te accurately guess the source Ue Gre an tntosantion and/er the lecal Chief, ‘LHERGO had told told Gacuas he was using Itkin. | oy” 3. The local Chief, LYERGO recalled that he had been led te believe by his own headquarters that there ence had been a relntionship between Itkin and JELANCE but that that: relation- . ship had been terminated before Itkin came te Londen. The. lecal Chief, LNERGO said that he hed not known and was surprised at the ; inference im the press thet JELANCE and LSERGO had simulstpngpus1y, head relationships with Itkin ag late as 1965, 4. ‘The lecal Chief, LHERGO did net vibe to me the neture of the investigations for which he Itkin beyond the fact that. they concerned criminal matters of interest to LHERGO | and GAGUAR O S. The local Cliief, LNERCO permitted me to tell Guors) thet he had handled Itkin in Londons on a erviminal matter about which Ghouas hed been advised. John L. LAUTERBACH