14-00000 3 | Service:; Officials: or th nes State | on Department,_.: sthe « Central 2 “In- telligence-. .Agency:3: and. ‘the : 7, (immigration and’ Nabiralization ' ae Service were: also. present: ; 7! ate! Noseakoowas ‘described 3 | Special fe Te Sew ork Tied! ~ WASHINGTON: "Feb: : . Yuri . I Nosenxo. tala % *Sovist Fer: - . Embassy “nfciatat. theirrean: FE : frontation here- last Friday-that % : he leit: Switreriand. on the-way] = s=|havine been completely” relaxed fro, te ores Seates: 28 -hours 2: aioe Sa ae uring the intérview_¢! fore t om? was. re- Swiss “| He.is . ‘ported by-thetRussians .to. the| mitted ‘to: song ane swith) fie. i upderitood Have tald [Swiss authorities:: fy—-.:} pal r. Nosenko-ri-¥ ca Eo businesslike- conference that h i, This statementiby’ ‘thé former ?}Tiformation® mz BY aulable cefected: ofthis’ ow: “Volition staff ‘officer’ of-the’ Soviet Com-| today: ; has. thrown naw ll i essires=*, mitre “of. ‘State7Security? thalon the defectfan® STM SLs : ee statements, if Was rspert= ‘Secret police‘appeared to amount AyThey Soviets delegetion- inted”. did’ not. allay” Soviet “résent2 ite a denial of the Soviet charze Geneva;: it.iwas* “reporced.” told[ ment agabust*Swiss: authorities: that. the Swiss: authorities. kad the Swiss: police’ 2f-5 PAG Fed, Diplomatic-repott rédching the [been negligas in , preventing his|5- that Afr: Nosenko-was. miss- State-Department- “Said that. So-{- “ar ste. ~.ping’ But Bir. wNosenko’s -statedviet: diplomats:in: foreign’ capi- sort Nosentio:: who qiit’as zlmants< in: thet presence -of: “ihe tals< ‘continued-to-register- ¢ com- ane rember of the Soviet delegation!Soviat: Exabassy ufiicial: are, said plaints about. alleged: negligence . to the Geneva Jo Csarmamentcon- — have. shown thatihis- ractualla:ter. Mr.: Nesenko’s | conference ference Rebs Was’ allowed: to| defection: took“place-at ALP ML with the Soviet diplomat. aan meet” with ta--Saeviet: diplomat] the. preceding c27% [acne inti tee ma here inthe oresecce o United rN LStates efficiais: cysthn. The - State’ Department y nounced atithe: time .thatt the ( ‘Confrontation. was ~ -taking plac : : in- Washingtom at the requestiot bassy. official: took“place iz.the : sees Soviet Embassy, _ but: no headquarters Or. epee tenet other details,were made -public.jtom ifield=“olti sot . lhe. department... said thatca migration: a jand. Natura a Sn OE OE lad gaan er eeiastoae +
been am item canes oe tails: ‘Earlier tessa - Soviet. «secret: Pol fScton-Yurt IF. Nosenko - 3s- in the- United States: where ="; Ke- =was: interviewed ‘yesters : day by officials. of: -both-the- Russian and ~ Swiss. -Em: bassies:z -op. SEBS pe Phe, State . Department said each, interview jew bated ToS UMS enna oe jan hour: and that a. Department™ : gificial was present each times: osenko" reaffirmed ‘his earlier: request for. asiyum. “in the? "State ‘Departments cokesmanee " Rieuard Ir Phillips <is giving tt i took: place oc: teg ‘was, possible: that: td iE there: will be: callowed - to “tall, with-Nosenko. E ‘soviet Kicks up Exss< ae t- - These developments . came fas the Soviet Uniom kicked up : ‘ta diplomatic fuss over the dis~ - “appearance of: Nosenko on nee meen a! aight TET TT Feb. 4, from Geneva, where ne nad seen assigned as an expert" in the Soviet delega- Hoa at the lv-nation disarma- ‘meat conference. ’ Philipps ‘said. he was ."on temporary ‘duty from KGo. (secret DO tice) headavarters in Mos- teoe.* : Up to yesterday Mosco-¥ had been directing its public ‘einlomatic wrath at the :Swiss, charging them witt ‘10082 security. The provision “for a Swiss diplomat to intec- wiew Nosenxo w2s to assure the - Swiss thal tne United States had takea part in no. ‘jttegal act on their soil. a /the Swiss. valready had | strongly rejec cted the Soviet cnarges. Oa Wednesday. Phillias re- See DEFECTOR, A5, Col 1
14-00000 ts at . Net neces, i are osenkox 7 presented Ning i 5, papers and*: oe : : rpg abltiasstagreeabler reply : < eatestod ‘eWedsesday in: Gen: ‘| private ais res deto the Spress Sevaz - Soviet. “disarmament dele- S gates: Semyonm ZK_+-Tsaranzin ae gave-newsmen-an 2 angry'state: “menttaimed, at-the Swiss and chargings:provocative activi, 3 iv by Aunspecifieds é gents¥Up-to: theo: Tsardp kin adrbéen-sayingybot private] INS. Wy ashingion~e aoe a “fand* publiclygthaty the! No42--In-publie T Re fa ob ‘ a8 ane ae eT oe) Eres wet Bi we -féctithe: disarmament’ tals rae cn Yesterday the Soviets ste ppedi aD their protest-in- tye: places, | from Switzer: as..flown ‘to’ 4 + TbaMoscow;; Soviets. = sree aGr may ‘yi iparently“cross2d‘ ae “thesoeieds Sea CALS - ihaeke pica paced larly biz, fish thats inew: anyyats ic lseretstonsthat he’ Knew: any: (thing? Ee abouts Soviet@disarma-. iment’ ‘Sthategy? Rather: they Security Iman ‘opérating, ta : ‘Sbviet: practice; in tie sSouletets stadio ; 4 gh oi het i knowledseot Suter tae Tenant ohn that Moscow: - ; out’ ‘probabiy~ nok m oh? “maore. imignt: Ravers ‘Stepped: UO. « itss * Lo, . : Believed Gennine- 2 i}protest’: Tafter-‘Tsarapkin,-had| .~ a Be es ee publicly: downgraded the’ case 7S Ie ‘ig: assumed here: that the lik. Genet: At any rate U.S: { ; int & 36-yedrold- -Nosenko- is.a-gen-! disarmament .negotiator’ Wil- ‘uine deiectoc: though ‘the pos-|tiam ‘C. Foster and ‘Tsarapkin sibility. of his being” a doubletpeld another business session ‘agent thas: “not? teeny overlook-lin Geneva yesterday at which \P ‘ed. Itvalso, : is, ‘falr- here’. thati they said: the case was. not dis- . “the - “Soviet: protest? ‘Was no cussed sett “>: : ould abe. ex.!.. It also was: ‘noted ‘ here that for: an ‘tthe’ Soviet: Communist: that} ) -| Central. -Committee:” “has - been! granted: in |e in: Moscow -all © BS
: where:it Scala, ‘be: observed before , the guards enter us the room etc. } me Arrangements are. to be made for the installation of” ‘adequate air- ~conditioning equipment to insure that a. comfortable. temperature is maintained. (It is under- stood that there is quite a bit of equipment available through Logistics channels, ) Subject. is “to receive a bath; change of underwear; change. of uniform; anda change of linen for his bed.
14-00000 SH ast - 3 sy sabects ‘to.receive: one: Sigatette 6 on: 72 May | 1964. Sura. e ATC fa the Subjeet will remain precisely Sour. Gace procedures, including é se: 2é z aacertainad that we: will. have custody. of: the Subject until at least July; ‘It was. _suggested that perhaps. we may wish :to-explore. some modifications | in the assignment of personnel , _or schedule of ‘assignments, In. addition, ‘the Acting Chief, : Support Branch has suggested, that. immediate’ consideration be Zivento. - devising necessary. ‘procedures. to- be’ followed. in the. event of an emergency involving loss of control of, ‘the Subject. ‘This should | be discussed: ‘immediately * ‘with. ‘the: ‘responsiblé DFO supervisors - and’ specific’ procedures devised, and all: guards: Properly informed ‘as to- their responsibilities in. this matter. ” ns Co Jack M. “Bauman Bauman/ ewd(5-1 2-64)