datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM _ AGENCY INFORMATION Released under the John AGENCY : CIA - Kennedy RECORD NUMBER : 104-10331-10340 RECORD SERIES : JFK AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PROJFILES-CORRESPONDENCE ollection Act of 1592 a eee oo eee re (44 USC 2107 Note). DOCUMENT INFORMATION ase#: NW 535217 Date: he-24-2017 WSsassination Records AGENCY ORIGINATOR : CIA FROM : BARRY HARRELSON ' TO : NOTE TO: JFK TEAM TITLE : MEMO: NEW JFK REVIEW PROCESS DATE : 03/06/1997 PAGES : 2 SUBJECTS : JFK ASSASSINATION HIGHLIGHTING POSTPONEMENTS DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER CLASSIFICATION : SECRET RESTRICTIONS : 1A CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED IN PART PUBLIC - RELEASED WITH DELETIONS DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 04/22/03 COMMENTS : JFK-M-16 : F13 : 2000.02.14.10:26:24:170054 [R] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10331-10340 HW 53217 Docld:32404469 Page 1
seen mh BLU Ta a See RR HT wi ee ee tae a Rete ect CR OT re niet Be etme SF er ne - iVyhul pan be 7G} hanmienmbion oP abis document .hise Padscs cinco rmmestiog concerniag both bhlorraphie informa- tion sucoblisd-and thet Found ueither in warlan’s antobiography nor in the reuorts on interviews wath her a} Mardaa -- already 25, according to her given. Jate of hbicth, and with 2 pharmacist's training -- phate in the hoot Let mntild 28 Cetoner? ; bh} Aecerding te Lee OSWALD s diary, Marina was a . homsomol member. The military service bockJet, hwoever, shows that she was neither a Komsomok ap CPST member. Yaad panier explanation can 7.8 Moeinr offer Pov this a)ooba Seetion Sta, "Srocdint notes, (Osebyye Otmetki) “ NW 53216 DocId:32404866 Page 10
SECRET * WORKING PAPER 6 March 1997 Note to JFK Team CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS | RELEASE IN FULL 2000 From: Barry Harrelson Subject: New JFK Review Process David Marwell, ARRB Executive Director, is planning to lise propose to the Board that they change the review process. il we KO The focus would change from’tracking individual postponements to tracking the release of d the new approach his staff would have th negotiate with the Agency on the release i ton and \y: | to make decisions on the released versions of documents. ! Only issues/documents of disagreement would be placed before Uh the Board. Marwell is convinced that even with an additional year —— they will not finish the project with the current approach. He and I spent some time discussing how a new process for would work. He would like to test this process for the April meeting. The following is a rough outline with some notes for your review . Please provide me with comments by COB Monday. 1) HRG and DO reviewers would review the documents the same as they do now (postponements would be blue highlighted). [no change in our procedures] 2) ARRB staff would review the blue highlighted document. a) If they agree, they would stamp the document “ARRB approved” and return it to HRG to process. for NARA. b) If they disagree they would highlight over the blue with yellow (creating green highlighting) ,or mark in some way, the information they think Should be released. If the two staffs cannot resolve the issue, then the document would go before the Board. [Major change: ARRB staff would no longer record all the proposed postponements, no DO “damage review”, no detailed determination letter requiring HRG reviewers to use the “grid” to determine what happen.] SECRE Tyan WW 53217 Docld: 32404469 Page 2
san SCRE - WORKING PAPER 3) “Non-issue” documents would be prepared by HRG for NARA and sent to the ARRB staff when ready. At that time the ARRB staff would prepare a simplified final determination notice and letter. [ No further action on the document would be required; HRG would file the final determination notice with the document in the retention and “new ORIS” file] .. 4) “Green” highlighted documents that go to. the Board would be handled the same as today. [The expectation is that a lot less documents would require Board action. ] , A major impact will be an increase in the number of documents reviewed. The new process creates a continuous flow of documents to be reviewed and prepared for NARA. The capability of the ARRB to handle documents would greatly increasing requiring us to pick up the pace of the review. an ceca gg(OROI™ SECRET HW 53217 DBocld:32404469 Page 3
HW 53217 CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RELEASE IN FULL 2000 4/3/97 Note for: John Pereira Subject: Meeting with Marwell 4/2/97 Topics discussed: 1. Extension Marwell says the extension request is going well. The Board is fully funded in the President amended budget. He does not see the need for a letter from CIA at this time; may need one later for Congress. 2. Name issue Marwell did not discuss the name issue with the Board; their time was dominated by the Zapruder Film issue (the open hearing was on CSPAN). He plans to include our proposal as part of his “new approach” package. His pitch to the board will be that the only way to complete the review of the sequestered collection is to change the current system. He will propose a comprehensive plan that includes not only procedural changes (how we handle the documents) but how substantive issues are addressed. The “new approach” will be addressed at the April 23-24 meeting. We should have.a final memo to him prior to that meeting. Marwell is re-reading the draft (copy attached) today and may provide additional comments. 3. New “review” procedures We have agree on the specific of the new procedures including using number codes for substitute language. ARRB staff will prepare a “test package” for next Board meeting. 4. Completion of Sequestered and Core collections Marwell is telling the Board that with the new approach they will be able to complete the review. He sees his staff greatly increasing the amount of time they will be spending on reviewing documents plus he plans hire additional people. He asked if it would be possible to have a statement/letter (MOA?) of commitment to completing the project by end of FY 1998. He was a little vague on what he had in mind, however, it is clear he is concerned about completing the review of the sequestered collection. I told him that I believed the review of the sequestered collection could be completed by October 1998 if most of the “non-relevant” microfilm material is designated NBR (not believed relevant) and we do not have to index each document. However, I said we could not make the same commitment to completing the “additional information / records” requests and that these requests could slow down the review of the sequestered collection. DocId:327404470 Page 2?
AGENCY RECORD NUMBER RECORD SERIES AGENCY FILE NUMBER JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM Released under the John F. ennedy Assassination Records AGENCY INFORMATION Oollection Act of 1992 [44 5c CIA bid? Note). Case#:NW 53217 104-10331-10366 Date: O6-24-2017 JFK PROJFILES - CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENT INFORMATION AGENCY ORIGINATOR : CIA FROM : DCI/IRO TO : DO/IRO TITLE : FORM: ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET: ARRB REQUEST DATE : 12/18/1998 PAGES : 1 SUBJECTS : JFK ASSASSINATION ARRB REQUEST DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED RESTRICTIONS : 1A CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED IN PART PUBLIC - RELEASED WITH DELETIONS DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 04/30/03 COMMENTS : JFK-M-16 F7 : 2000.02.16.15:41:13:543044 ATTACHMENTS NOT INCLUDED (R] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10331-10366 HW 53217 DoclId:32404495 Page 1
aT CIA SPECIAKCOfLECTIONS ’ are - RELEASENN FULL A tachment t 200 | : ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET “"“f#2.. SUBJECT: (Optional) ARRB Keauesr FROM: DCI/ IRS COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to show from whom Crow 0 Fine ocreus columns after eoch comment.) rere reds rome
HW 53217 28 January 1997 Mr. T. Jeremy Gunn General Counsel and Associate Director for Research and Analysis Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20530. Re: Request for Additional Information and ‘Records No. CIA-15 (Documents in Win Scott's Files Identified from Russ Holmes Files) Dear Jeremy: ' Enclosed are the documents which you requested in your letter to Mr. John Pereira, dated January 6, 1997: HMMA 22668, 2 January 1964 Reel 67-REP-155, 21 December 1963 (attached to HMMA 22668) Memo for the Record from David Phillips, dtd 5 August 1963 Mexico City 4409, dated 2 May 1963 Memo for the File from Scott, Subj: Amb. Mann dated 8 November 1963 , These documents are located in the Microfilm collection (Reel 64, Box 19, Folder A). Attached to each document is the redacted version which was forwarded to the National Archives. Sincerely, J. Barry Harrelson Historical Review Group Enclosures: Documents, as stated above © UNCLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES DoclId: 327404569 Page 3 a
wS HERE Ps. _ HRG/JBH:maq (28 Jan 97) Distribution: Orig - Adse w/encls 1 - HRG File w/o encls 1 - JBH w/encls SECRET. HW 53217 DBocld:32404569 Page 4
-12- discussed in the exchange between Mr. Merchant and General Cabell. (Gray Tr. 9, 17). oo. . he The records of a National Security Council . ——— meeting on March 10, 1960* and a Special Group meeting on March 14, 1960 contain phrases that arguably refer to discussion of a Castro assassination. HW 54653 DoclId: 3242735557 Page 18
‘ 39 VuDIs: N “SINSHdIND A? 40 S3)51d NO SA TDINIA Oa1STINSOINA TEES HONUL SOUVT BT @SHONUL TIVNS: OT VIVES. 82 SS INSLIONV TLL HLEM, INS AdAYD a : AB _TAS] PBT rEOpeNssbeeee TU S01 IU Wd S012 32627026 Page 159 DoclIad
WW 53216 BRCRET es : . —_ ‘ a - 52 - At home, at home, at home. It does not happen so (("It is not so" - Ne byvayet tak)). Imagine ~—= in no way ((does it happen so)). There must be some kind of foundations for your having filled it out at home. Well, what kind of foundation? Well, what kind of foundation can ((there)) be? I do not know. I want to understand, but I do not find ((any foundation)). I would say to you even more.... Look here; if we continue further on this question I am afraid that I myself will become confused; you will see ((this)) and say: "Listen, ((B's surname)), what are you saying? Now you told me one ((thing)); now you are telling me another, but earlier, you told my colleagues == a third." . | You understand (vy poymite) that I will become confused. As soon as I came here today, I said that my task, together with you.. To untangle.... ...TO straighten out everything. Right. But, you see, you... me. You; say "untangle", and at the same time you ask me such details which I do not remember: "go, tell ((me)), and how was this?" But I do not remember.... When I first asked you about the questionnaire and so on, you said, "I do not remember", but then you said: "At home." DoclId: 327404699 Page 56
HW 53716 SENRET ® -;_. ©@ worked in the Ukraine and, in your opinion, ((is)) Minister in Moldavia, ((that)) his true first name (nastoyashcheye imya) ((is)) Sergey Romanovich.... I do not know. ... Lieutenant General.... Lieutenant General.... All the trouble ((is)) in the following, you understand _- you already have repogated (povtoryayete) this several times and you say that he was Minister in the Ukraine, and so forth. You know that in Moldavia, the Minister for State Security or the Chairman of the Committee for State Security, in your time and now _ to the present day -- is (sidit), or, in any case, last year, was: Lt Gen SAVCHENKO, Ivan Tikhonovich. (1G)... SAVCHENKO, what his first name ((is)) I do not know. But I do not know his first name. You see, I want to say, when you are not certain or do not know.... ((Interrupts)) So, but more I do not know the first name; I am saying, SAVCHENKO.... You say that that SAVCHENKO who previously was in the Ukraine ((and)) then was chief of Intelligence, now he is Minister in Moldavia.... In Moldavia, yes, this one. But I want to tell you that there is another Lt Gen ( (SAVCHENKO) ) and not this SAVCHENKO, but ((another)) SAVCHENKO; I have given (nazval) you both correct first names; in Moldavia, the Chairman of the KGB whom you know as this one, the other SAVCHENKO, whose name ((is)) Ivan Tikhonovich, who also at one time was a KGB employee and at ‘SECRET. DoclId: 327404700 Page 6
HW 55157 _ &f w Folder Summaries of the Nosenko Material Not Believed to be Relevant to the JFK Assassination Reel 45, Folder 3 During July and August 1965, Peter Deryabin, a Soviet defector, conducted a series of interrogations of Nosenko in conjunction with CIA efforts to establish Nosenko’s bona fides. This folder contains one 66 page verbatim transcript of two interrogation sessions which cover Nosenko’s family, background, early career and Komsomol experiences. Reel 45 Folder 4 This folder contains a 76 page verbatim transcript of two interrogation sessions by Peter Deryabin which cover Nosenko’s career, Party membership, Komsomol personalities and procedures, military personalities and experiences, and his incarcération by CIA. 3 Reel 45 Folder 5 This folder contains a 59 page verbatim transcript of two interrogation sessions by Peter Deryabin which cover Nosenko’s military career, KGB buildings, personalities and procedures, and other Soviet intelligence people, roles, and titles. Reel 45, Folder 6 All the documents in this folder, but one, have been released to the public. The NBR document is a five page February 1964 memo from the Director of the Soviet Division (C/SR) David Murphy to the Deputy Director of Plans (DD/P) Richard Helms on plans to debrief Nosenko based on C/SR’s belief that Nosenko is a Soviet plant. Reel 45, Folder 8A and B Folder 8A contains the 263 page “Conclusions and Comments in the Case of Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko” 1] October 1968 report by Bruce Solie, Deputy Chief of the Security Research Staff which concludes that Nosenko is a bona fide defector and should be believed. A sanitized version of the Solie report has been released to the public. The . NBR document in folder’8B is a 135 page report on Nosenko prepared in April 1969 by N. Scott Miler of the Counterintelligence Staff (DC/CI/SIG) based on the comments and questions of Anatoliy Golitsyn. The report contains Golitsyn’s comments on . inconstancies he believes exist in Nosenko’s testimony and his recommendations for further questioning. Golitsyn believed Nosenko was a dispatched agent. \ DoclId: 327404522 Page 2?7
oo a STE MCT 2) AY 62 REPORTS RPP BOK LEATELY. 4 me Wed OF SANTIAGO be “cuba a 75 =53-3 01 CTS 7 “BARE acs “One ee AUN INESTRATIVE QUTLDING» 2 SUPPORT. BUILD SNGgoo 32627026 Page 208 td: Doe
6 October 1997 Note To: DO From: Barry Harrelson a JFK Project Officer Historical Review Group Subject: Nosenko records in JFK Collection The ARRB (JFK Board) staff has agreed to accept CIA's designation of 25 folders of the Nosenko material in the JFK sequestered collection as “not believed to be relevant” ~*~ (NBR)... The staff plans to present their proposal to the JFK Board at the 14 October meeting. The Board requires a description of all NBRs to be made available to the public. Please review the attached draft prepared byARRB staff? : member, Michelle Combs, for classification and public release. The ARRB staff needs a response by COB Thursday if possible. HRG/DO JFK reviewers here have no problem with: the draft and recommend release. If you have any questions, call me on 31825. Thanks. a Pex plne call Cran Fach UT ‘AOR Pow <c Nes wo o> bh wt JFK Act 6 (1) (A) JFK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld:32404522 Page 26
may) , ‘ bs, * i - —sEeRE ics] e . . (S) ii. Crypt LINLUCK -- ARRB staff did not find our evidence memo on this crypt persuasive. They are expected to recommend that the Board reaffirm its decision to release. , “ {AIUQ) — iii. 1967 IG report on "Castro Assassination Plots” -- ARRB has requested that an updated version be released to NARA by the’end’ofJanuary. Any disagreements between the Agency and ARRB staff may be added to the agenda. HRP and DO reviewers are currently re-reviewing the report. (U) 2. If you have any questions about any of these items please call me. ce: Leno Becky Rant @ DA ae Sent on 15 January 1998 at 05:24:34 PM Wn Act 6 (1) (A) JEK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 Docld:327404521 Page 23
Ne OT Tene ae PaGE Tyo KX 199-96 COUNTER INTELL IG ENCE. _ SECURITY ITEMS REQUIRING THE PERSONAL ATTENT IOW OF THE SAC UTILIZE aBOUT 5 PERCENT OF HIS TINE ON EACH CATEGORY. END. . ° DBS FBIH@ ACK FOR ONE AND CLR i NW 34926 Doocld: 32909476 Page 5
Bel BS ~ 8G omel| = 8 fo — & F — To > Soo — 4h = oe 3 - QS - 1¢ . | . — : | | V6 a4 09 (00 > lo! er [03 | (279 od —, cod = foS - lod - oa V0 ~ (28 = (2% = ae) = LUL
TASKS _ PURPOS ECONOMIC - continued To obtain policy approval for i, of creating economic chaos inside } ai Cuba. | i Al 23.) Submit plan for introduction a Ed “~ bAtok «pb 2- CONSIDERATIONS Cuba's economy is the Castro- Communist regime's greatest vulnerability and is open to much greater exploitation. ocld:324274916 Page 11
HW 50955 HW 56329 A Ravana. radiobroadcast. 10 January quoted the Central Comittes of the Venezuelan Comminist Party as calling Président Betencowrt's goverment the "prineipel enemy of the Venezuelan people today. it called on the people end Communist Party of Venesuela to "pastor and wee Gll forms of combat needed to achieve Liberation and netional sovereignty.” A 7 Jenuary broadcast beamed from Havana to Pers aed thet “the military«government junta may rest complétély assured thet there will be xevolution in Peru and the people will. take over power,” ond it condhided « "Wow ie the time to resides with greater ferce and vigor} strike against abuse, strike sgninst violations....the strike ia the most powerful. Weapon. The strike can de more than rifles and bullets.” lary, OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 2 Doclda:32423995 Page 37 Docld: 3274273640 Page 38
c ~ fe. aa —SEEREF- %, . SUBJECT: J Required Protection of JFK Act 6 (1) (B) as CIA Facility onss/ewe] amine «meh /49870 (07 Nov 97) modified OIM/IRG/LSStrickland/31289 (13 Nov 97) Distribution: Orig - Addressee 2 - DDA - OIM/IRG Chrono - C/OIM/IRG - D/OIM - OIM Legal Advisor - D/OFSS C/FMG/OFSS - DO/cco - Cc FMG/OFSS-— nn renee ae ORK Act 6 (1) (B) - DC | Co eee coer a : ee - OFSS Registr g: \iperdwp\general\iss\arrb] | —_ | PRP PRP eee PB ' 16 HW 55157 DBocld:32404534 Page 17
"=~" 26 Séptember 1996 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director Assassination Records Review Board FROM: John ‘F. Pereira Central Intelligence Agency SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Release of JEK Act 6 (1) (B) in the Lopez Report Aiavedl, 1. The attached memorandum is provided in support of our request that the JFK board reconsider its decision to release the reference tof orkacts ie) in the Lopez Report (p. 44). 2. We request that this memorandum and attachment be returned to CIA once the Board has completed its deliberations on this issue. Attachment HW 35157 Docld: 324045354 Page 16
ey Assassination Records Review Board Review Guidelines , for Information Relating to Official Cover _ This document sets forth the review guidelines for use by the Assassination Records Review Board (“Board” or “ARRB”) and the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA” or “Agency”) for public release of certain information concerning the identity, scope, details, and specific mechanisms of official cover (hereafter “official cover details”). These guidelines have been officially adopted by the Board to serve the public interest in making the complete story of the JFK assassination available while protecting from official disclosure information which would be harmful to the national security and is properly classified under Executive Order 12958. 1. Information in documents originated by the Congress (most often in the context of personal statements to committees or committee staffs) which sets forth official cover details shall be presumptively released unless it sets forth specific information not generally known to the public or the Agency shall be able to demonstrate that it has taken affirmative action to prevent the disclosure of such information in the past and that release here would cause identifiable damage to the national security. 2. Information in documents originated by the Executive Branch (including those designated by the parties as quasi-executive branch documents which reflect extracts from the records of the Executive Branch) which sets forth official cover details shall be presumptively postponed to the extent that it concerns: ° identification of the official cover provider, e specific locations used for official cover, and e identity, scope, details and mechanisms of any particular official cover. 3. Information in such documents which the Executive Branch has taken an affirmative act to-. officially disclose or allow to be disclosed shall be presumed to be releasable. °° 4. Moreover, information in such documents which relates to individuals who are considered important to the story of the assassination shall, consistent with past practice, be considered for release on an individual basis with the Agency having a higher standard of proof of damage to the national security. 5. For any information postponed pursuant to these Guidelines, the Agency agrees to provide a summary or substitution which preserves the content and relevance of the postponed information. . Neither these guidelines nor the release of documents pursuant to these guidelines shall be deemed to constitute an official Executive Branch acknowledgment of the identity, scope, details, and specific ’. mechanisms of official cover in other information disclosure law matters. t HW 35157 For the Assassination Records Review Board: Docld: 32404537. Page &
HW 55157 Judge Tunheim SECRET we JFK Act 6 (1) (A) C/DO/OCC ae IRK Act 6 (1) (B} F(OGC) (CST) Distribution: ER 97-5738 Orig - Addressee 1 - Gc 1 - D/CSI 1 - ADDA 1 - ADDO 1 - 1- 1 - John Pereira 1 - Barry Harrelson(CST) 1 - EA/Chrono 1 - ER ; DoclId: 327404537 Page 19 SECRET
cy Nene c™ oN NY 50955 Doclda:32423995 Page 38 HW 56329 Bocld:324273640 Page 39 To et nA lA RR ES SPE TE EA AR hCG aS aE ne ee Sa ET EL te oe Se
{(Z [3 | | ee | | —_ H4 | AL | _ lo | _ le | 1b ie —_ cc 1Zo. | _ ie _— 1o5 . . ee 123 | 7 [24 | oT 12S jon [Z?¢ . | “? 127 _ }24 120 . _—. \3z a \33 _ (34 . Be 133 | . ( Me \3 4 (35 139 | _ | 138 (34. 48 | ter 135 lu ld NW 54969 DocId: 32989512 vace 66 -«
GPR Act 6 (1) (A) JEK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld:324045357 Page 31
JFK Act 6 (1) (A) JFK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld:32404537 Page 33
SHORE ET JFK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld:32404537 Page 43
SEK Act 6 (1) (A) JEK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld: 324045357 Page 45
4 _ . | ! i . | el SIGUANEA CRUTSECATS SSILE SITE 7 CU 2137N Ba258 “ON. - OF PINES 1 Ni Ss OF” STGUANEA ATRFIELO ; aq fU2-5U-15u. If 1S SITUATED «7h —_t CAND s ON ACHILLTOR, ON THE EAST COAST OF THE he Y GCF SIGUANEA. _ 7 THE SITE ie SIMILAR TO THOSE OBSERVED AT _UANES 4 AMD ) SANTA CRUZ IRTE IN GOTH —AND AS Soci ateo ec UTPNENT. THE SITE CONSISTS OF THO 7 a . __ INCLINED LAUNCHERS APPROXIMATELY 253 SET APART, : eum DEGREES ANO 24M DEGREES RESPECTIVELY. \ LAUNCHERS ARE CONNECTED GY CABLE TOA i VIFF RADAR AND ANOTHER UNIDENTIFIED TYPE i j RANAR» BUTH RADARS APPEAR TO BE NETTEO, TO THE REAR QE THE CAUNCHERS ANO AT THE FOOT OF THE HILL SEVEN MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, FIVE ARCH-ROGFED 5 UNE. LAND SEVERAL PROBAGLE. TRUCES 32627026 Page 215 Docla
JFK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld: 32404537 Page 46
JEK Act JEK Act 6 HW 55157 DBocld:32404537 Page 50
JEK Act JEK Act 6 HW 55157 DBocld:324045357 Page 55
GPK Act 6 (1) (A) JEK Act 6 (1) (B) HW 55157 DBocld:324045357 Page 60
AW 50955 HW 56329 ’ Guatemala: A new attempt to oust the Ydigoras regime may dé made shortly by the Cubsan-supported "13 Novenber"” group of ex- Guatemalan army men. ‘The Guatamalen intlitary attache in Mexico told his U,S. cowiterpart there that "13 November" leaders in Mexico: appear woll-financed aint are buying arms and supplies for an operation to begin late this month or early next. | ‘The group, which led a. guerrilla. outbreak earlier thia year, ie reported by a usually reliable source to have recefved at least $10,000 in Cuban financial assistance sinc® last March. Meanwhile, sporadic bomb explosions in Guatemala City may mark the begiming of a néw anti-government campaign, though the U.S. Esbassy there reports that et the moment there eré no vital fasues stirring up popular feeling ageinst the regime. Docld: 32423995 Page 54 Docld: 3274273640 Page 55
FK Act JEK Act 6 HW 55157 DBocld:324045357 Page 61
JEK Act 6 JEK Act 6 HW 55157 DBocld:32404537 Page 70