- an \ A OANNIDB ( : go , ff 2. SARR IB Eon a . ™L SP Crerowe: 404 t0a510036h °° MeMO FOR FILE os eS SUBJTCT |: _ Bennent. Bagley te Yesterday at about noon Mr. Bagley's attorney phoned - | 7 OGG asking for the following: ~~ _ ot as The originsl copy of a memo said to be in Bagley's handwriting, concerning options for Nosenkots disposal This. Was in the Hart testimony at Lins 1218. and, ‘thie’ Hels tee testimony at line 461 Ow -be The original ang excised portion of. a Bag agkoy ‘mgno cl referring to the Purposes of a _polygraph of Nosonko.". This io Was at vine 2981. ‘of the 8 Hart Vestinony & and | 2068 of the Helms a 6 Pe testimony a ; ee: ae — te “The original letter from Bagley Le taevas tating conse wy TES Leet er Rha m e ot AS EORIREM oce Bat NTC Ht ES Ny OnE Sseanes tun Sues meer afiaaenett ne ee ‘quences’ " he in. the. Hart: ‘Lestimony. atlline, ETTe ee Z we aa de " Bagleyts _ootiplete® Personnel file, “tneluting 4 specifically: ve epweite oe rnsetemey () reference ‘to Bagley's transfer from Headquarters in de oA le “the, 1968/6 "periods os _— a ca” (2) Fitness Reports and comients for the 1962-72 variod. a ta aA: (3) Promotion recomagndations for 1962~72 period. , (4) His IMM and the associated citation. ae w. 2+ We asked the various parties to gather the items requasted to See what was involved. The OPF was at Headayarters, having been POSTE NED RT Ram aeewre ptt meant ote WOME! ; bgought from WIC for the HSCA inquiry. The Honor and Merits Awards ; nad e_ . 2 ; Board had the medal and citation (having been brought up for a Pils Peciaw). CI Staff hed thr d,cumants cit-d in t2s tars tesinony, de met yesterday afternoon to consider what is involved. Bagley wanted the material an appearance at HSCA this morning. ao 2% + 22 (ADMINISTRATCVS —- INTYRNAL Usm ONLY COBO AAO A TATE,
74-00000 2 val. fm _ a. | (| ADMINISTRATIVS - INT*RHNAL.USt/ “LY | we | aso 3, CCS has a standin sition on non-rglease of citations _ vending Pos - 8 7 ae and awards to persons retired uncer cover \ ; _ ht } 80 he would have to make a decision on that before he could have the mat-rial. He could not be given some _ or his personnel records, as they are clsssfied, although he could be shown them as in a_ Privacy Act requests he is not now cleared for acc-ss_t0 classified material, although his attorney iss. “cr: Statt considers the materials not cited in the Hart tastinony’ es . “classified; those portions authorized for Ue are unclassified only to the extent used by Hart; the exeaption is’ the entire handvritten list of options, .which has been provided the Committe. at its r-quest, and he can See that When he appears before the Commi ttnes _ a I tried to contact the DDA and DDO, reaching “John Nether, He BER ees with this preLininary | position. Hike Melani Phoned_ me, tack, today, indicating that when the cover aspect is straightened ¢ out Bagley should. be treated as anyone else.» _Dick Rintnger of OGG, naanuhile, had advised Mr. Chabot, Bagley's attorney, that the cover cofisideration has to be resolved first. Bagley was there and Rininger also spoke to hin, with Bagley indicating his intention to have his cover removed. —_ tod SDBreckinridge ADMINISTRATIVS ~ INT RNAL US" ONLY tA SPE SERENE ROT NBER TS RID Nn SAAS AST LOT DARE IS aR HE BS ot LO ET SS TALE Ne NY Hiern ta SERED BNL tr ere etme ET i ety TER he he a APIO Aft Aan meee tet ai Sais d ne es ted nnne en Ainbrene ser tbs ante os yeaa ss et 3 a JIN