Ue teb aed t bathe ; Fitness Report - Wigren, Lee H. . # 006198 Reviewing Official Comments (continued) - impression which is also important to the Agency. In sum, I regard him as a competent officer who is performing well in his present assignment. i i . ; : i 1 : : . . H , i : i : i ' t : Se rire no ! : t o fate eee “a 2
CLASSIFICATION FITNESS REPORT SECTION A ‘GENERAL INFORMATION __ _ . }. EMPLOYEE NUMBER PaO NaMey itost, frat, middie) — “s eare S SF GURY a BEX” is aRavele. “oD 006198 —-- | WIGREN, Lee. He  Asfei/23 im [13 j baa 7. UFFIGIAL PODITION TITLE: a. OFF, DIV/BR OF ASDIGNMENT ©, CURMENT STATION | i 10, CODE fk one) (Ops Officer -IPPOICL OWS IRS). x [noe] [or _ 1a. TYPE OF APPOINTMENT ee ee ee rave | vo ps ! ‘loTHam (Spec) “yh oo CAREER RESERVE CONTRAC EMPORARY : 13. REPORTING PERIOD (from-to) ta. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP.. 29 Sept 1973 ~ 30 Sept 1976 | ob re SECTION Bo . __ QUALIFICATIONS. "UPDATE IS BEING SUBMITTED WITH CHANGES, AND 1S “ATTACHED TO Tet§ REPORT, PLACE THE it WO CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, PLACE TRE WOkS "NO' IN THE BOX AT RIGHT. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION — ane . A-eating in this category requires immadiste oad not thee cemesial action. The nolure of the action te reenign mest 9 ot fo toparation. Describe action toben if QUAUFICATIONS UPOATE FORM WORD “YES IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT. SECTION Coo U-Unsatisioctory Performance is waacs could range from counseling, te further taining, to placing on probation, ‘or propoted in Section 0. Perfarmance is deficient invaone onpects, The reasons for antigning thin rating shoe be woted in Section O and remedial actions M~—Marginal P.- Proficient $—Strong O-Outttanding fohen ar recommended shavid be destribed, a ; Performance ‘sy satoluctory, Desired results oro belag produced iv the manner expected. , i " Performance is characterized by vaceptional proficiency. “*, Parformance is 1a eeceptionol in relation fo requivemanty of the work ond in comparinse & the performance of others doing similor work as fo warrant wecial revognition. _ SPECIFIC DUTIES _ ibe vg to sia of the most important specitic dur! ‘0+ parfarmed during the rating period. insert rating letter which bert deuribes the manner in which omployee performs EACH opecific duty. Consider ONLY aftectivenens In porformance of that duty. All employees with wyerchery reopansibilities MUST be rated on thelr ability 10 supervise (indicate number of employees supervised). . OPECiric DUTY NO. 4 . ~ ~ ~~ — ~~ "RATING The conduct of research into sensitive counterintelligence cases, primarily cases involving Soviet intelligence and security and S Bloc operatio __. a etn oe SPECIFIC OUTY NO. Asem by Se polly es and analyses Pi iected counterintgel. ieee gence. material tir nest diga fon Oviet inte agence Oreanization and activi ty : maintain is tiles of such matertals. ses theSe materia in memorandums , reperts, and commentaries utilized in sensitive hbo S +3 Liaison with designated counterintelligence and sec: ity services. epecific DUTY NO.3 Collects, Organizes and maintains other basic data on. Soviet intelligence and security for research purposes. Acts as COPS referent on Soviet intelligence and sccurity matters. RATING LETTER RATING ‘SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 . . LETTER Conducts, from time to time, counterintelligence source debriefings Records, analyzes, and distributes the resulting data. S pein ae cote nn Srecific OUTY NO. BLee etures , par icipates in, and fonducts briefings and Cartes resentations inside t gency and utder the auspices of the U.S. ngelligence pee erent ty on Sqvi ct intelligeyce. and security resTy ices ) and relate political developments And communist international ( and Soviet=« directed. subversion | SPECIFIC DUTY HO. & 7 Canter OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION RATING LETTER Take Inte account everything about the emolopes uhich influences his efectivenass in hy current position suc 4 sa aecformance of specific duties. productivity, conduct un jab, coopgtat»eness, pertinent personal traits of habit, and particular timizotions or sabsomy Based on your hnowledge of employee's overall perfarmance during the rating par sod, place the letter in the roting | boa corresponding % tee Vatemest which moi! accu: S rotaly: ratlects his level of performance. we uteceta Paycttes CLASSIFICATION . o:73 45 inisions rare te weer cr ay 086274 ms = y EET 9°73
| pony | Scbiec | i . CLASSIFICATION _ NARRATIVE COMERS” (SECTION. O Indicae-signilicant strengths ar weaknesset comonstrated in current potition heaping i pr seer paripective their relationship to overall performansa. Siute wippottans made for improremant of wor’. performance. Give recommendations for brateie. errr" on forsigs longvage competence, if required for currants jnmition, Amplity of esplain ratings given in Settion C "9 provid, best joea-t Appi future perionnet action, Manner of parformance of mancyrul ar wupervivory duties and cot consciousness in the use of personnel, sate, eauipegnt and funds, must be commentec’ on, if opplicoble. te. gate ino is needed to complete Section D, attach a separate thee? of paper. ikcthough Subject has only been under my supervision for some four’ nebs, Lo can but: agree with earlier comments on his performance. Steet has an encyclopedic knowledge of the organization, function and jstury of the vurious Soviet. intelligence and security orgins. lle s @ hivhly skilled researcher and a gifted writer. .His work in reguting classified studies on the various aspects of the Soviet intekLigence services and operations has been consistently impressive. fe _ Subject has not had the field experience usually associated with his age and yrade, but the lack of this has not been a drawback in his chosen research duties. In the future Subject will profit from seeking out oppertunities for further activity rather than, as at present, waiting until assignments are given to him, ; Co in addition to his research abilities, Subject is a highly: effective ra lecturer, much sought after by other agencies who are conducting siodng in the CI field. nO . Subject has encountered some Slight problems with his staff€ during 2 reporting period, but these are essentially minor. In my opinion fect. is in the forefront of research personnel at his grade level. SECRON Ee. : CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS . : 1. BY SUPERVISOR _. MOcHeEMPLOVEE MAS BEEN VF THI8 REPGAT HAG NOT BEEN BHO 410 FO EUPLOYER, GIVE EXPLANATION MUS? MY GUPERVIBION ae ee ne ere DATE 7 OFFICIAL TITLE OF GUPERVIBOR. | Pitta Bambi SPAT AS : ‘ AC/CIRA ; i ~ 2, BY EMPLOYEE — EteTEMANT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION Toate {SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYER : oF a PERFORMANCE /f oe 16 . ee Kee ft c ! | fiseva arracnan | HAVE MOT ATTACHED { t i. 3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL A CORMANTS OF AEVIEWING OFFICIAL { endorsel______ Section D evaluation. I have found Mr. Wigren to be a. wery, dependable and resourceful individual .in undertaking the extensive research coummitments that the staff has undertaken in reeting very heavy obligations of gansitive liaison exchanges over the past year. Yr. Wigren is above all a gentie- mam in his attitude toward and treatment of others. I would say in the long run gts. works to his disadvantage because his contribution and his modesty tend to -, te overriddén by the pretentions and bluster of others. Mr. Wigren has what has ‘ mow: become a most precious commodity to the 050 in counterintelligence and that is ‘@ grasp on many of the aspects of the collegial memory. He is therefore in a mist tion not go to contribute yseful ideag for new nroiects, but to correct, mend, and-modify suggestions_an Pcourses_of action put lip by others who-do—n re OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OF FICiAn lT¥PEO OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUSE we TE § . - . nave the facts. In ofher words, this is a man whose continued _utilisy and mizential are consideyable in my judgment. : i