404-10406-10257 a LOUIS STEELS, OHIO, CHARMAN ‘ - nat /- JRICHAFISOA PREYER, ALG. : SAMUEL L. DEVINE, O10 . bo Sob ae et / i’ WALTON B. Feurgteo. Oc. STEWAHT B, IAC KINNEY, CONN, . we eae pp ne “a AAA. Swe oe YVOUNE OR. ATHWAIT. Ee AE, CALIF. GHARLES THONE, HESH. . . ? HAMOLD 5S. SAWYER, MICH. w Harsib E, PORo, TENN. FLOY'e J. FITHIAP INO, : me Se tect Caminritiee wit Assassing tlozis an / ROBEAT W. EDGAR, PA. 7. om . : l 4 UL. Tonge «af Sepeeeentatived + (202) 225-4825 , 9330 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON, ,.G. 20515 . August 28, 1978 Mr. Scott Breckinridge. Chief Coordinator, HSCA - Office of Legislative Counsel . Central Intelligence Agency . ‘Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Mr. Breckinridge: In accordance with Professor Blakey's discussion with you last week, and in keeping with the timetable proposed at that time, the following interrogatories _ A are submitted for your consideration. Ll. Enumerate the name of any drug given to Nosenko and the date it was administered -- 1 _including those given for "therapeutic" pur- poses --.from January 1964 to 1968. 2. Describe in detail Nosenko's living condi- wo: _. tions from April 4; 1964 through 1968. The ae description should include, but not be limited CS. to the. following: e$ a.. where he lived b. the degree. to which his movements \ .were restricted ''e. . his contact with. other people d. his access to radio, television and reading materials such as newspapers and books e. the degree to which his actions were NO "observed" oms. restrictions with regard to his food intake .-, '34.. Define Nosenko's present and past employment om a / arrangements: with the. central Intelligence ' Agency. OS34e
13-00000 Mr. Scott Breckinridge ; Page 2 Include: a. the dates and nature of his employment b. the services rendered by Nosenko c. itemized. accountirig of all compensation . received by Nosenko i¢d. an account of the roles of Richard Helms i* and John McCone in authorizing Nosenko's employment. and compensation arrangements with the ' CIA é) 7 4, On what dates. and for how long was Nosenko we ci/es questioned: by the CIA about Lee Harvey Oswald me ‘-- from 1964. to present. ‘5... ‘when Nosenko was questioned by the CIA about “yale aye Tapes Harvey ‘Oswald, -who did the questioning. 6. What background, if any, did the interrogator nu SE ck “hive in interrogations. What knowledge did the “interrogator. have with. respect” to. Oswald's back- ground. 1, (on the - dates that Nosenko was, . questioned about SOswald . does. there-now exist or did. there ever exist: a. a tape- of. ‘the questions asked and Nosenko' oe answers” be. a. ‘transcript. of the questions . asked and. --.-Nosenko' S.answers. Cc. a Summary of the questions asked and  -Nosenko! Ss. answers =: i i 8. What. criteria, if any, was. used to. determine: la. what. ‘subjects to question Nosenko about» b, how: much time to devote to each subject m9. CAhat significance -~- with respect to possible \. foreign involvement in the assassination as. well 7 \ as to the issue of. Nosenko' $s bonafides -- did “Ve-4/. the CIA attach during. the years. 1964- 4-1968° to-No- “ssenko! s Statements. about. Oswald? ; 10. What significance ~- with respect. to possible | foreign involvement: in the assassination as well -as-to the issue of Nosenko's bonafides -- does the CIA attach today to Nosenko's statements about Oswal
13-00000 Mx. Scott Breckinridge Page 3 “1. “If the answer ‘to question 9 is different -from.the response to.question 10, when did the change occur and why? — , “12. - What : was ‘the CIA' s position from 1964 to (1968. on’ the. question of whether Nosenko is bonafide? 13. what. is- the CIA's position today on the | question of -whether. Nosenko is bonafide? 14, If. the answer: to question 12 sis different from the response to question | 13, when did the. change occur and why? 15.  What.was ‘the CIA's. position: from 1964 to. 1968 on whether Nosenko was telling the truth in the statements he made to the CIA about Oswald? 16.° What is the ‘CIA's position today as to whether CL yee ‘Mosenko: was. telling the truth in the statements he made to the CIA about Oswald? 17. ‘Tf the answer to.question 15 is different from hed oo, ‘the response to; question 16, when did. the change ceppavedl occur and why? per haa te 18. Why were three polygraph tests given to Nosenko? . Br. 19.) What is the CIA's ‘position with regard to the Me ne oe validity of ¢ach of the three polygraph tests ad- : oo _ “ministered to Nosenko? . © 20. ‘Why. | was Nosenko. asked numerous questions. per- taining to Oswald on. his 1966 polygraph test and QS > only asked two questions about Oswald on his 1968 - <_ test? si io thy 2h. Who authorized Bruce Solie to reinvestigate , Melee (Tiago Nosenko's bonafides? 22. Why was Nosenko's bonafides reinvestigated in SY |.1968? - 23. Did either the FBI or the CIA have primary re- OS - sponsibility for investigating. Nosenko's statements
13-00000 Mr. Scott Breckinridge Page 4 “about Oswald? If neither had primary responsibility, Ct ce gwas there any division of responsibility? C gat at 24. ° What communication, if any, existed between the fo Ny FBI .and CIA with respect to evaluating and/or in- Co Ee 'vestigating Nosenko's statements about Oswald? ‘Thank you for your continued cooperation. se (WY SO — Sincerely, Ae - ae A Ghost BRa Reg hb & ee Coe 7 ; ; G. Robert Blakey , Chief Counsel and Director -GRB:kkr