e. - « | . PON eben Set at 23 dune 1960 MECAANDUM FOR THE BSCOED GUBZECT: Guidance to Gerefing ROKAULDE for bis Meeting vith Busebio MUJAL gm 26 dune to Diseuss MUJAL's List of CTC Leavers (copy attached) and Answer MUJAL's Request for Comments es to which of Then Might — soe be Acceptable to FED. } ee a eae LR ate L i a fats 1. On 22 June Mesore. __pe 30D called on Mr. Beichhardt, oe wa/e/PA, and requested aseie in giving guidance to ROMULDI for bis discussion Pe with MIJAL on 26 June of the attached list of CTC leaders, which vas prepared by MOJAL for the purp ee of determining from ROMAUIDI whieh of these leaders Bight be aeceptable for inclueion im a labor front to function as part of the FED. Mr. ke Reichhard’ said he would Like to review the background on this before giving thea \ 7 - Qh anawer. : 4 - oy @, On 2§ June Mr met with Mr. Reiebhardt and Mise Tharpe. With f io _weference to MUJAL’s & labor front in connection with the FRD, Mr. Reichhardt fos be: gaid we hed no knowledge of any plan for a iabor front as euch. Nr. Reichhardt ~ JE «| -) weferred to the agreement between 100 and WH/S that there would be no official cone V4 %) Geet with MUJAL end ROMAULDI's eontect would be continued only for the purpose of = | - _. Rondtering, and that to the extent possible GIA assets vould be used to negate - cee ae MIJAL's activities. He aleo mentioned that Tony VARGHA had said he would talk CO>-8 °° 4 PSWIAL from time to time in order to be dnformed of what MOJAL was doing, but he bed ne idea of including MMJAL, or any uf hie group, in the FED complex. Mr. * Reichhardt said he felt 1% must be asaumed that MIJAL is avare of ROMAUIDI'a eone neetion with the U.8. Government and vould, therefore, interpret RCNAULDI's reply ' gs official approval or Gisapproval. In view of the above, Mr. Reichhardt reecumended | ¢hat ROMAULDI's response to MIJAL should be that the choice of labor leadera to be 4 affiliated with the PRD. ie an FRD matter and would have to be decided by FRED leadera, nr f bot it vas ROMAULDE’s pereonal opinion that none of the CTC leaders listed by MUJAL ‘ would be aeceptable to the FAD because of their affiliation with the BATISTA regime. Be suggested that if MUJAL pressed ROMAUIOL for an answer, be might tell «.JAL he | '. - ghould take the matter up with VARONA. ; 9. ereéed with the above in principle and thougnt RGAG se tte reply mG | $0 MUJAL eb long those Lines. However, he brought up the matter of VARGHA's i. ge@legtion of Rafael OTERO, who ds closely allied vith MHAL, to mke a speaking four of Iatin Americas and sentioned thas VARGA bad previously indicated an interest _ fn Manolo FERNANDEZ of the Artists Union. Both OTERO and FERHARDEZ are included on “BEgAL’s list. Mr. Reichhard$ said he did not know VARGWAts reason for selecting ' gYE"S for thie tour, but ainee 14 was not to begin until 2 duly, Hr. Droller would pave time to discuss the matter again with VARONA and take some action if it wag éeqided that OTERO is ton closely nllied with MUJAL to be effective with latin Do Not Reproduce : Eedet of GIO Inséera wet .. Aserican labor movements, Kr remarked that OfSRO is well known to labor 4 Be movemente in other latin Amearé emintries, but he ie not an effective epgaker and i yoo.) dg & kev MUSALISTA oF i ‘ Martha Pharpe  RETURNTOCIA™| fu So Wii/o/Political Action Background Use Only. | 4 b- Atteohmants A 1 eee H vo : 4 ac wl. aN EES aad 8 Be BBAE aioe rnin met Ak OF * ’ - - ai