‘404-10172-10097 ® © © SECRET ok (WHEN FILED IM; PRIOR TO FILING 1. Fill in Sect. 2. on back. Detach back flap and forward to RID. 2. Destroy front cover sheet, unless it records significant action taken or comments requiring preservation. $2. orrcias sett EAL If file no. and title shown are not ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET _INSTRUCTIONS om proper, insert proper file co. below and forward ducument to RID/AN. PROPER FILE NO. PRE Tes i ‘ “mact h 4 teace f thy feereeee OA mcqueen © j rothee | 'moee” ‘ ; co a te oo em hm | ee tte nee = eatin ee EON TO ALL ADORESSEES FILL IN SECTION « OM BACK, IF APPROPALATE comments ; RECIRDS OFFICER STA? The £é6llowing action ig authorized: reaaone - (tte. - PORE MY MEER FRMARY COOK iv rdinata ome sacl vieraneahel bara SanennemnaaE | 00 we Do Not Reproduce RETURN TO CIA. Background Use Only a oS
74-90000 . e 2 ect all armen A”, Ain RE FERUAER : — Transmittal of LCFLUTTER Results <- AMDENIM/1 #55064 : ; ACTION REQUIRED . REF REPLACES i. Forwards herewith (RYBAT) are the LOFLUTTEA results of AMDERIH/) (201-~251853), 2, Forwarded ander separate cover are the identities of the above mentioned report. ERD OF DISPATCH A. Beport RYBAT B. Identities EYBAT Distribution: 2 ~ KuSODA wfett A h/e; B use: 2 «= BAS of ® atts. f ‘P Attachments: a . i -
~ exile group he could not hinself control.- Ia the: past; -, Subjeet has consistently refused to accept an LOPLUTTER Uf the KUBARK files aro an eccurate representation ‘of soe SECRET RYBAT | € 55064 15 April 1963 Subject: AMDENIN/1 AMDENTH/1 was fnterviewed and tested on 11 April ata safe site in the Miani area. The iaterview- was raquested by Norman D, KIGGINS and it was conducted: ia the - English language. KIGOINS monitored the major part. ef the interview, AMDENiM/1 has a POA and an GA has been requested, A sajor purpose of the interview was to try to deternine Subjest’s view of his relationship with KUBARK, he test itself covered foreign intelligence conuunism and the possibility of Subject's counection with any persohm or grou which he was deliborately concealing from KUBARK, - . RESULTS - os . AMDENIM/1 {s not an¢ has not been invelved with any... non ODYOKE intelligence service. He has not baen-involved tions with eny persons or groups which he is deliberately. oonnealing from KUBARK, Subjcot wentioned hig involvement. dn any communist cotivities. He doss not have any “eoinee«* -~ with the UNIDAD KEVOLUCIONARIA and the COMAKDO L-66 (CI-66).. BACKOROUND. © a Subject has beon in touch vith KUBARK representatives since January 1959. Current KUBARK effert is directed toward attenupting to assert a greater degree ef eontrol over Subjest,. The history of Subject's. association wi K has largely been ‘a history of his atteap:’ te ass hie independence ~ not oni9/KUBARK but also of any: Cuban’ AMDENTH/1's motives, théy portray a nan dedicated to free=: ing Cuba.- but on his owa terns, , SOP beh oF DETAILS 7 a : The examiner begen the interview by asking Subject why - he had se cousistently objected to LCPLUTTER, In a rather reanbling way Subjeot stated that he saw hinself as an *ally" working with ODYOKE to bring about the end of Castro. Ho resieted any atteapt to put hin in a position where he would feel thut he was an employee of KUBARE;-> He: cone STuND” “ sidered LCFLUTTER a syabo!t of the loss ef his. indopendence. The examiner then asked if Subject scant thet he did no ae want to feel himself controlled, AMDENTH/1 objected - to the use of tle vord "control", acverthetess what re (Waa it seem sent PERCSSeseeh “ecard 1/6R
Tee cee tae epee tes entnematnlnane after gaia -goved in the diroction of using the Cubans for ends vhish - . decided that without KUBANK aid, he oan de nothing - "Subject would not cooperate with AUBARK. For oxaeple;. if SECRET RYBAT. . #ss004 15 April 1963 Page 2 ; eayfug anounted te the sano thing, About this. ‘point, ~ he castigated KUMALA's choice of "égont personnel | (nan are making uw better Living going through the ‘notion. ae for KUBARK than they ever did before) and KUBARK's ‘choice ; ef Cuban leaders - ARTINE and the wombers of the ‘CONSEJO, In fact, throughout the entire interview, Subject con~ trasted his succeseacs with the failures of other KUNARK directed efforts, He contranted the pre-invasion firet team case officers with the post invasion second team, If the oxaminer is allowed to sua up the underlying, but never cloarly expressed, frase of reference which Subject sees, It would be this: Prior to the invasion,» KUBARK worked with the.Cubans in an attempt to defeat: Castro, Ever sinoe the invasion, KUDARK has inoreasingly. are often clouded. In taking the LOFLUTTER Subject“ a signaled his neocptance ef the new order, He has: apperan ly “ although he is atill not sure what ean be done with it.- Me was willing to gv on recerd by responding in _the affirua- a tive to the. question asked on the tests - . _ “Do you fool thet KUTARK's hand Ling ‘of ‘the “Cuban” ae situation has been inept?* c Vas there an area, the examiner asked, in which . he (AMDENIM/1):-received information which he .knew woilld. be of interest. to KUDAMK, ‘would he refrain from ‘reporting {t°°° if he. decided it was not in the best interests of the. Cubans | to do so. Subject ducked that question. by stating that he”: would be oareful not te find out something that he Bight” have to report, He noted that most Cubana know of his’: . relationship with KUDARK and they would refrain from torlitg: bis anything they did not want to reach KUBARK, ae - In addition to’ questions ‘relating te foreign minteitigonce | avd consunisas Subject was asked: — cee ol, ‘ te eer en gene Excepting the UK and CL~66, are you involved with any other political or revolutionary group? De you have a relationship with any person or group which you are doliberately coucealing fron. KOBARK? lave you used any KUBARK funds in any unauthorized senner? (This question neant had he used KUNARK funds for anything forbidden by KUBARK) Pe EN EN eee omar nee gfe eer we mureece me
7 —STPRET RYBAT # 85066 1S April 1963 Page 3 Have you had any knowledge ‘ef any unauthorized o group's activities which you did net report: to ust ‘ Subject answered in the Bo gative to all and there was no indication of deception, Bo Keith D. WIMST? RECORDS crFtesa sta T8 Solloving action ia , agthorizas: 20 he meme + Save ED ee me poe mined co te