104-10418-10169 TO es ee oe _ Vf OSCLASSIFTED © eeRCBE Nat SUBJECT: FROM: : (Officer designation, room number, and DATE building} ‘ T UML F79-0510 CR F78-1534 (Optional) Request of David C. MARTIN re: Angleton vs Turner on Nosenko EXTENSION DATE CERT 29 May 1979 ° 6027) = =R1211 Jesse Guajardo 6400 R9581 ‘Prucvrnse part DDA/IPS — 2E42 HOS DX2 12 June 1979 5 COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom | to whem. Draw o line across column: after each comment } OFFICER'S INITIALS RECEIVED FORWARDED DDO/FPG Please note interest of: Ht e” eek etme com 3749 “O SECRET. O CONFIDENTIAL [1] yse-onty © _.]_ UNCLASSIFIED cee ee eee ee etc oa cerca Litem \—oS Ne
13-00000 /. Po / 31 May 1979 Lou x ‘ a Seer 7 This afternoon I talked with Chris Winkle re David Martin's request for documents related to the Angleton case. : His comments were as follows: Martin obviously got his act together from the Stipulation of Dismissal document on file with the U.S. District Court in Alexandria. (The copy of the Stipulation of Dismissal we had on file in quy Litigation folder did not include the Exhibit A'' referred to in paragraph one of the Stipulation.) "Exhibit A" was the 20 March 1979 letter to Angleton's lawyer, Chabot, from “Ernest ‘Mayerfeld, outlining the specific items in the litigation that Angleton would “be allowed access to". (ide had = capy of H bet no’ indication “Hh was “Exhibit A *) Don't answer his initial request any sooner than necessary. When we do, deny release off thd “information, maintiining it is still classified and involves protection of sources and methods, (b)(1)(b)(3) of FOTA. If he appeals we will worry about it later. But there's no denying that Martin knows of the existence of the ‘specific documents. , (Chris said that is sending out an interim response from TPS.) coe, <= 7 : | i: ne me Eleanor , ~ ; . "°° ¢ gpoketo Lou D. and reafirméd that what we are proposing to do is to deny these documents to Martin even though some of them were - '. previously prepared for release in sanitize form to Angleton in litigation, We acknowledged that if it had not. been for OGC's release of three documents to Angleton without coordination with the DO we would have "Glomarized" | Angleton's request. A "Glomar" response is also not possible to Martin for the same reasons piusxxkex but also beeaause exhibit A“on file in U.S. _ . Pistrie Court in Alexandra and that exhibit lists the documents that Martin “4g requesting. The proposal now is to list and deny the documents to_ Martin under (b)(1) and (b)(3) of FOIA. 2-0 |, Se a Be we 31 May 79 0 =
13-00000 + FIL E7COMPONEN seanckeo | e . ’ Bt. * wAQG/CIS . e | 3se4003 TUBE DT:5 DC/DCD/STAFF A 913 KEY BLDG. C/FR/PLANS 2E-19 TUBE BU-6 C/CI/RAM 28-28 TUBE CU-6 ; “} C/OG/SCB ' | GB.1907 TUBE ES-2 ted a J 1AD-TG/OS | 68.704 TUBE ES-2 m 5 > & ri = oe a. | ry <2} OG/ARP </} GH.8o TUBE GT.7 ASB/US GC-32 DC/CCS/PRG GH-56 | C/AF/STAFF A : 38-17 TUBE ES-5 EA/RES/EXO $0-5109 TUBE EW-2 C/EUR/STAFF A 46-4406 TUBE BS3 C/LA/STAFF B 3C-34 TUBE ET-3 NE/STAFF B/FOIA 60-3115 TUBE CU-7 C/SE/PO 58-4803 TUBE FS-% C/CMS/MSB 20-42 PREDECESSOR RECORDS GA-30 tA0/CAS/PB 30-109 TUBE CU-6 DC/AD/SOG 16-4846 TUBE CU.6 OG/iS (Recheck) 1B-4003 TUBE DT-S APPLICANT FILES TRAVEL LISTING MIA FILES occ -: 7C-24 oLc 70-49 (10-78) 4078 1 STR 8 8 AO REPRINT pre mre Om Seco At ary rey wes Sina |e Hote eR one ae ee a ew Hope ey sa ee ene eee Gee ENR oe ees waren SUNMARY OF FOIA-TA PROCESSING . - ; oon “)- PE Fs make ALUTG - RL | . Cate. . SLATE M RE US bee wy PON SA Eee wen ome ene ener REQUESTED [DS veins "CSUN ADL, ae Cast NO. No WEGATIVE Pp a i co umes = en ee ’ har ALEC RRA : : xfs fo pee) A 29 OSIC DATE-IN DATE-OUT PROCE SSE RS ASLPHOCES AER FRALY ST su BIECT (FOIA cases only) _ ei chew vs 7 burt PREVIOUS FOIA/PA CASES AND REFERRALS CHECK: IPS-LOG, 1PS-HIST POST 77 AND _@'PSHIST PRE 77, LIST ONLY THOSE 4° REE DOM CASES THAT HAVE THE SAME SUBJECT AS THIS CASE... jecesremavecnse Seed [areas wasect ao mounce | [ves [vo [areas neavesten aoe source [| [veel] | [srwas coven pnowioee vo neovesven | [vee] [vo OATES) OF COVER : i 1S REQUESTER A CURRENT EMPLOYEE. | [ves tno | | i} tS REQUESTER A FORMER EMPLOYEE || | xe | | DATE(S) OF EMPLOYMENT CRYPTONYMS, PSEVOONYMS OR AKA'S . N $ z 9 al 4 ¢ tt 42) CONFIDENTIAL © CL. BY: 612170
13-00000 A, a pene anvttal f 5 JIAY Way 15, 1979 IPS REGISTRY ; 4700 Drummond Ave. i (= 79 ~ Chevy Chase, bid. 20015 — § George W. Owens fi “a Information and Privacy Coordinator be : Central Intelligence Agency Cet ? OGC sled Le Washington, D.C. 20505 able to, provic Dear Mr. Owens alteety relacre nds ° ; The atta i Under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby {ox : ‘| request copies of the following documents as described in the wr recent case of Angleton v. Turner, 78-865-A, in the U.S. District irkigadineed Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Divisions : rem 4 -- “the incoming telegram from Genéva describing the . & first contact and meeting with Mr. Nosenko and t a Ke) elegram* which Mr. Angleton sent to Geneva in replyé" a "ett FOND - ce : Release bn Aetmrdry eh arrose” rem © -- “the document which supports Mr. Hart's‘allegation that Mr. Angleton visited the installation in Northern Virginia . ¢ at which Mr. Nosenko was detained. (Please note that there-is ee no mention of Northern Virginia in Mr. Hart's testimony. See p. pee - 250, line 4626. The document indicates that the visit by Mr. Angleton was to a facility outside Northern Virginia. );" een & -- “any documents . that reflect that Mr. leton or any member of the Counter Intelligence Staff participated in any conference, discussion or meeting relating to the alleged hostile interrogation of Mr. Nosenko;” dere T -- “the memorandum referred to by Mr. nen ee p. 165 of Har .‘s committee testimony) regarding a conversation between Mr. Angleton and the Chief of the Soviet Division;" meen 1? ~- “the tape or transcript of the interview ig tioned in Mr. Hart's testimony in which Mr. Angleton is alleged to have referred to Mr. Bagley’s having ‘caught a big fish’. (Nosenko).” ' Since these documents have already been identified in response 7 y) to Mr. Angleton's demands for access to the material, I would expect that my. request could be handled with a minimum of delay. sot - . Sincerely, ee — | Dawiac. Matin David C. Martin bl, hd e2 & Ul Aty
13-00000 « Fon Lee . | | Sd CE ENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGEscv - ; an ee” “20 “AR 1379 WASHINGTON, D.C. 2Os555 O4C T4- 026053 Philip L. Chabot, Jr. Duncan, Brown, Weinberg and Palmer, P.C.. Suite 1200 1775 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Dear Phil: Re: Angleton v. Turner Civil Action No. 78-865-A I am writing you regarding our telephone conversation of 19 March 1979 and Mr. Angleton's acceptance of our pending settlement offer in the above-captioned litigation. The offer outstanding is for your client,.James J. Angleton, to be allowed access to the records mentioned in our 9 March 1979 letter to you, viz:. l. the contract by which Mr. John Hart was employed for the purpose of representing the Central Intelligence Agency in testimony before the House AssasSinations Committee (This document has previously been released to Mr. Angleton with some deletions in. response to his FOIA request. Under the terms of this offer, Mr. Angleton would be permitted to see the unredacted version.); . 2. the document by which Mr. Hart was authorized to review agency files in preparation for the Committee testimony (A further review of the files has resulted in the discovery of documents which may have some bearing on this portion of the request. These will be made available to Mr. Angleton pursuant to the terms enumerated in CIA's 9 March 1979 letter to you.); 3. the ‘document, setting forth the guidelines under which Mr. Hart's testimony was given (Like the . dgcument requested per subparagraph 1 above, this document has been previously released to Mr. Angleton. Under the terms of our settlement offer, Mr. Angleton would, likewise, - be permitted to view the unexcised version.);
13-00000 oN , oe be ne Nad 4. the incoming telegram from Geneva describing the first contact and meeting with Mr. Nosenke and tin "long telegram" which Mr. Angleton sent to Geneva in reply; 5. the document which supports Mr. Nart's alle- gation that Hr. Angleton visited the installation in Northern Virginia at which Mr. Nosenko was detained (Please note that there is no mention of Northern Virginia in Mr. Hart's testimony. See, p. 250, line 4626. The document indicates that the visit by Mr. Angleton was to a facility outside Northern Virginia.); 6. any document(s) that reflect that Mr. Angleton or any member of the Counterintelligence Staff partici- pated in any conference, discussion or meeting relating . to the alleged hostile interrogation of. Mr. Nosenko; and 7. ‘the memorandum referred to by Mr. Hart (See, .p. 165 of Hart's Committee Testimony) regarding a -conversation: between Mr. Angleton and the Chief of the Soviet. Division. In addition to the above materials, Mr.- Angleton will “also be allowed access to item No. 10 requested from CIA in your 11 December 1978 letter to the Freedom of Information ‘Coordinator, i. @.: the tape or transcript of the interview mentioned in Mr. Hart's testimony in which Mr. Angleton is alleged to have referred to Mr. Bagley" s having “caught a big fish" (Nosenko). Access will be granted. to Mr. Angleton on the same’ basis as mentioned in our 9 March 1979 letter to you. Should Mr. Angleton wish to disclose portions of the con~. tents of these documents to members or staffers of the Select Committee on Assassinations of ‘the U.S. House of Representatives, he should apply for such authority to the Agency via the undersigned. Acceptance of this offer will terminate our controvers as to ail the CIA records requested by your client under the FOIA and allow us. to. _Stipulate a dismissal of the pending litigation. ; N
13-00000 If this letter correctly states our settlement agiur- ment, please sign the enclosed copy in the appropriate place indicated and return to the undersigned. As soon as your concurrence is received, I will telephone you to make arrangements for Mr. Angleton to. come to CIA Headquarters to review the documents. Sincerely, ” | va eo £ . Ernest Mayerfeld Associate General: Counsel CONCUR: Philip L. Chabot, Jr. Date
13-00000 ow e wo, « Q an be em ‘ vot, tA ba” Raye ue a) : Nu” . { ‘ ~ _ te ae vet ot 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA JAMES J. ANGLETON, Plaintiff, Ve “Civil Action No.. 78-865-A STANSFIELD TURNER, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. Sat Nye Noes Saw Sea Se? Naas? Sem Sie? “rma Some STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for ‘the parties hereto i. That on 20 March 1979 counsel for the parties entered into a written agreement by which defendant: agreed to provide plaintiff with access to those documents set forth in Exhibit A which were requested by plaintiff, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act in order that he might rely upon them in his testimony before the Select Committee on Assassinations, United States House of Representatives. | | 2. That on 29 March 1979 plaintiff was given the opportunity to and did inspect the documents listed above. It is further stipulated by and between counsel for the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that this action be dismissed with prejudice, except as to as ences este Emer fF EAE ests EPPA PE nA +A SARE OE A Oe ne ree EY Foe Sen Stee ce et ee em nA 8 OTD STRETCH ATED SERRE Se SAPS OMENS EEE IID censors 2 ele oD GRR EEE er er er ery ?
13-00000 the amount, if any, of attorney's fees and costs to which plaintiff is entitled pursuant to the Freedom of Information | Act. f A e, ? Mh hee va bh. Oona) ° JR. , WILLIAM B. CUMMINGS yaw Duncan, Brown, Weinberg & United States Attorney - Palmer, P.C. i: Suite 1200 © 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 TELEPHONE: 202/467-6370 ELSIE L. MUNSELL 605 Prince Stree ; Assistant U.S. Attorney Post Office Box 602 117 South Washington Street Alexandria, Virginia 22313 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 TELEPHONE: 703/548-1112 TELEPHONE: 703/557-9100 Counsel for Defendant ] } |! /sie=a: jy Conpses for Plaintiff 1] \ j : equ APPROVED this | tT “ day of fFLyaw| , 1979 ‘UNITED STATES DISTR ct JUDGE
13-00000 a boo 30 Jul 79 aes . MEMORANDUM FOR: RECORD al Don Robinson from OS ex 1150 questiined if we had released TS-197124 dated Feb 68 it concerne Nosenko and was titled Examination of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector. He said that the FBI was investigating a xg unauthorized release which was sourced to this-document. I informed him that we in FPG had not addressec this document in any FOIA/PA case yet | Brad R/ FORM 5-75 101 eoirions Wy. 8. GPO:1977-0-234-508 FPMR (41 CER) 1O1-11.6 -