404-10173-10130 AN par ask pen baemeesinn ¢ tenting introns Teme A ie RETA wy POUR te Indes ag EC ents ak atte Teg tA bape oeree Wa, 5 t f. i % . became- cos : ‘information on what Hunt did not do, for the Agency during that period. ‘keeping files on Watergate. - messages to Helms. He would advise the action officer, I said we are 20 December 1973 MEMORANDUM’ FOR THE RECORD , SUBJECT: E. Howard Hunt _ iF ‘phoned Paul, Burns; Speci Assistant to the Do, ‘and. said that we had some leads that could be followed by whoever has” the action in the DDO in tracking ‘down Hunt's activities during. the ; fall of 1964, when-he was alleg d to: have been engaged in surveillance: “ vactivities of Barry Goldwater.” | 7 | . 2. © said that. our files showed: ‘Hant was in DO Division (Burris i was not familiar with that title, but recognized itas the predecessor “ot FR Division) and ia August 1964 was assigned to the Washington field office, I suggested that Stan Gaines, who was Deputy Division | - Chief of DO Division and now DCOS[____] might be in-a- position to™ . give a few groups on What Hunt was. supposed, to be ‘doing then. suggested that he be queried by cable, Burns ‘said Gaines is staying © on under ‘contraét for a while, so would cont inue to ‘be available, , 3. 7 said. ‘that Fig Coleman was on the Iberian desk when the ‘Hunt assignmient io Madrid was brought. up in 1964 and when Hunt . went to the field in 1965; He could give the ‘background on the assign- ‘Went, which. seems. to have ‘been through. Karamessines at Helms! ; v told him that Coleman . direction. _His recollection would give ‘leads. later, ; after: Hunt left Spain, and could® provide | - I suggested that ‘both Helms. and Karamessities should be queried. I-gave asa possible. press treatment that Hunt was engaged. in” ‘domestic operations (something Senator Baker is piirsuing). and that . Ris assignment to Spain after. the election could be presented as giving © him time to cooloff. I thought we had to pursue the mattér to ‘be sure we know the facts. Lye ob . : 4 He said we are on the PLMHPLANK for. available for any help we can 1 Bives , mn or ~, 'S. D, Brecknridre CO. SHAE fe» : Lasked Burns to be ‘sure that we are on information. distribution sof cables to the field on this, given our assigned responsibility for
74-09000 f . . ( SON . ‘ 4 20 December 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: E. Howard Hunt : 7 : __ 1, F phoned’ Paul Burns, Special Assistant to the DDO, and - 4 f said that we had some leads that could be followed by. whoever has — a i. ‘the action in the DDO in tracking down Hunt's activities during the °. if i fall of 1964, when he was alleged to have been engaged in surveillance io i " activities of Barry Goldwater.. ; ce ; 5 S 2. L said that our files showed Hunt was in DO) Division (Burns ne é was-not familiar with that title, but recognized it as the predecessor So a of FR Division) and in August 1964 was assigned-to the Washington oo 4 3 field office. I suggested that Stan Gaines, who was Deputy Division =” i zg: . Chief of DO Division and now DCOS might be in a position to ~< ° give a few groups on what Hunt was Supposed to’be doing then. Lo 7” ne? * oe ke __suggested that he be queried by cable. Burns-said Gaines is staying " ract for a while, so would continue to be available, 9. . on under cont ; - 3, I said that Fig Coleman was on the Iberian desk when the - ’ - Hunt assignment to Madrid was brought up ‘in 1964 and when Hunt : a ae \ “went to the field in1965.~ He could give the background on the assign- ; . ‘ment, which seems to have been through Karamessines at Helms! t 4 direction. His recollection would give leads. I told him. that Coleman. 14 i 2 became cos[___[ater. after Hunt left Spain, and could provide = et : a .'. «- information’on what Hunt did not do for the Agency during that périod., a : £ ° i suggested that both Helms arid Karamessines should be queried, ’ B - Jgaveas a ‘possible press treatment that Hunt was engaged-in | eB, Es domestic operations (something Senator Baker is pursuing) and that: - } . ‘. , his assignimient to Spain after the clection could be presented as giving” po - 4 "*. \ him time to cool off. I thought we had to pursue the matter tobe - 3 ‘sure. we know the facts. oo , : - Do oa i ‘4, Lasked.Burns to be sure that.we aré on information distribution ... : eS ee ‘of cables to the field on this, givea our assigned. responsibility for oe “4 . ‘ Fa ‘keeping files on Watergate. He.said we are on the PLMHPLANK for arr - we os messages to Helms. He would advise the action officer, I said we.are HS - ? availablé for any help we can give. ae ao i, . . mo . . S. D, Brecknridge a . “| « . vo ~ } wonoet
14-00000 9 May 1974 Cie hy cre a MEMORANDUM FOR: _ OPS/RMO SUBJECT ot Watergate Fite R Research - Final Report Lee cae: ~ A The. files of the. tinned tate office of the chief, ops/ose :. have ‘beén checked ‘for matérial relevant to thé subject of this . 7 ; memorandum: . The check included chronological files a ' cations ‘of which Iwas the author while assigned to : ‘in the period July 1970 to July. 1973, . Nothing pertinent was: found. ‘ PEE Sea Ul Orie 2, 4 have attempted to recollect any other details which . oo : conceivably could_be pertinent and which relate to the period : . of my assignment The only points which I recall but SS on which I have no documentation are these: Mewar: see oF a. There. were occasional joshing. ‘inquiries: made: of me by American. residents about the reported presence in Spain of E, Howard Hunt in 1972.. My standard reply was. that I knew only what I had heard rumored. For the record,. "at nd time did Huat contact me, and I have never known of his i shaving tried, to contact any: Station personnel in during > ; : the period 1970- 73. I. made no effort personally o ascertain... - Cot Ry whether or not Hunt was in Spain, and I had no effort made by : any Station member. - oat, om J Le, 7. SUSU Wi tia es Benet essen bat - a}. “A. Station officer, possibly. now ; rr a assigned t Was given some information by an ~~. - le a _ informant in “concerning “reported. activities in Spain. Mee a by. Robert ‘Yesco. i suggested that the information be given ©. CL, informally ‘to -the Embassy's. Economic Section. chief, John. cutee Pen cabs __ Oliver. - That’ ‘officer was ‘charged with keeping: ‘abreast. of ot - 0 8 | developments related to Vesco. “The Station did. not pursue - ft to ‘that subject, as J recall; because it was not a topic of Te, ge reportable. interest, according t to. vequirenents. of the period: ee er TUNES ACCA 98 OHS nontte- meson eomuRiveanainit cee SY geet 1S. W021 na aA AME oe ete, ' £2 IMPCET CL BY 056759 aD He 7
14-00000 on ene EL Lt SE ee re tena an ate tee 1909 eee LO StU ee MCE RACE SE REN Bo rei ar irs mania ve cts amen come, — . SAREE, aad Sem Fa stented oj ieseerme te Robert E. Owen - Chief, 0PS/056- he ~ i i i 1 4 a0 i a oe i t : ie a 1 fee H i i : : i a t : i : ' ~ 1 : ! i ' : t mr. a H a t : ge a ree i a ci ‘oe i or od . SECRET ae -2- : SUBJECT: Nateroagte Fila Qosearch - Final Repsrt (cont'd) ce me 3. There: is no other ‘employee assigned to my immediate P . office who has relevant personal knowledge’ of events. and oe personalities: - ne _ LS . - 7 Del OS Otc Beh tah aren p88 oF: he ein emma Aakaiest cans sr etre re eects cin a ae ment ne ‘ sale vos
14-00000 ~-- - e . . . t oO uNctassinéD D ay OD contté. atta seer — _ ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET | ae rs ee, Beye >° ee or a re “| Director of Finance. a . _ | Sane —_ a ; po, 212. Ke L ; . 22 February 1974 “, 4 ., bento ; bate Orrcers. Comments [Number each commest te stew fread whom | oy : rr re HaTIALS to whom, Orrw ¢ line cereis toluma efter each eoamamert,}.. x ae TE sgt OLE. * ‘ Inspector ‘General « .-. aa — ° 3 2 - \ : - 2 2 F . . z ; _ a. - be — a - o i a. : 14, . ; i yeccranpaanannanasnanenasienta —ateme Samed dean V5. Zz | ae t wee PET eremR eooenew omer rmrerve ae mo INTERNAL 71 snare seeveren
14-00000 ~ SECRET — A : 27 FES 1974 j MEMORANDUM FOR:. Inspector General - | - i _ SUBJECT. : Howard Hunt a . : , . £ '. 2, .At*the recent request of the Deputy Director for. oo 5. ‘Management and Services, the Office of Finance has searched - es eee 5 ‘ its records to determine if we could find any payment to ...° Coe Be ¥ . Mr. Hunt -in an amount of approximately $30,000 that required: - e i. no accounting. | a . So, : dy 2. We have searched the following records: h of a. The expense runs for the period July 1964 to. : . June 1973 for the immediate Office of the DCI, — gs i ag the immediate Office of the DD/P, FI Staff, 4 i -" + €I Staff, CA Staff and the Office of Security. oe ; We have checked various items that were re- — i. é: flected in these expense.records but have. ; : i identified nothing relating to Mr. Hunt. i ee b. Thel Station, JMWAVE and FR/Washington. : 5 _ O£f1ce accountings to determine if there. were — ; : i . funds. passed by. the Stations to Mr. Hunt during J it te 2 ‘the year he servéd under non-official cover in . i : : . Madrid. We could find no payment to .Mr. Hunt’ . © . na _ Bre Te, ' i @ither in his true name or his two identified. - ne - pe cs Mr, Hunt's travel claims. for the period. - obo Z “ . 1960-1972 and have found nothing in thesé a a . travel claims that were not consistent with: - —_ a i normal travel expenses, i.e., ‘transportation, - . . i 7 ‘per diem. -. roe, a re “& od. We made a specific analysis of Mr. Hunt's. a, f° _ -advance‘account for the périod he was under — | ne A . Mon-official cover (July '65-Sept '66) and have _ } E E2 IMPDET ° é, CL BY: 006567 [.. : " se yey, - i wie ud SEO ec
14-00000 SO SUBJECT: Howard Hunt ’ co Bo determined that $33,500 was advanced to hin . - Lo "for travel and transportation of household go. oo - goods. to and froin Madrid with one trip to : ; Paris for he and his family to renew their : i - ’ Spanish visas. All of this advance was fully — 4 . Bo a accounted for. However, in his accounting, a ; _- one item appeared unusual, It was an-— 7 : 4 ; — expenditure of $1,600 for a sensitive «i. : aL vs -- operation which was approved. for write-off by Mr. 7 oe sce’. 9. Désmond Fitzgerald on 1 June 1966 without : fe _ further accounting... - a i i _ 3.° Also, we confirmed that no other Agency advance accourts | ee were established for. Mr. Hunt during this period. = i A, At the beginning of his non-official cover tour, it : i was necessary to establish a bank account in his name. The ! a EUR Division accordingly requested we open an account at the : a Chase Manhattan Bank in Mr. Hunt's name to receive all non- j : - salary payments. (Mr. Hunt had-an account at Riges National } : _ Bank to receive his salary arid. allowance payments). ‘The | i 8 following deposits were made to the account during. 1965 and | 4 1966: vo : I i i, Account opened: 13 July 1965 Tb 22 July 1965 $000 FB cee be . iS September 1965: . $000" 0. oe of. 6 October 1965". 5,000 coe FE i - 19 July 1966 | .5,000. °° i All of the above have been accounted, for by submission ~°..; a ; '. of travel and transportation accountings. 0 °° | sR, . vot “+ _°. .§, . We feel at this time without specific puidelines that po t further searching would be somewhat fruitless, One strange. | pe i aspect ofthe non-official cover assignment in Madrid .is that... i 5 all the costs were charged to the support allotment. of ‘the Pe : EUR Division which is not normal as non-official: cover people ‘ : : are usually assigned to a project. It is unusual to have a. case officer abroad for one year on an operational assignment ; oo, : . without him incurring operational expenditures, . ; 3 Gop 5 - Obert Eo
14-00000 SUBJECT: Howard Hunt '6. The Office of Finance has not found. operational ; “expenditures except for the $1,600 mentioned above. ae ’ Therefore, it is suggested that Mr. Karamessines be questioned i as to a project or projects to which.Mr. Hunt's operational expenditures if: incurred would have been charged. ee he Another possible course of. actio is t request the Director - to approve my asking. at Chase , : “Manhattan Bank to- provide a transcript of all entries into . t / Mee Hunt! s Ghase Manhattan Bank account. - . orn : BEASTS BNE 8 et gee eg ee e s. 2 . 8. ‘We are curently. reviewing ‘¥ecords of all cashier' s ‘checks prepared and issued by Monetary to determine if any : ‘weré payable to Mr. Hunt, Hopefully this effort will be - i finished by the end of ‘the week. eehAbe nares eyo ar ype ett oaatt mgs tanaka Px hide “thomas x he Director of F nance Le% SOENOSLIES, Pea Seem ge teases s e Vetere arveat oe sue We donee aes fn pe co re * ER ON TACHA ROO ed CIRO ER ERE SAUL tony cetlimeiaynr
aT ratty Weak wee ta Bathe ct pabet ioene the ere me, eee Taga. Wagan est | SOM Sel oe SEE Ace Pebaseae TUB Tear BM roe Eg cen PRAMS Gene, te LEN tarateaye y told him that. Hunt was going to Spain under nonofficial cover. ‘much about jt. ‘Hunt was to have the telephone number of the COS, -biut he would do 20 December 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR ‘THE RECORD. SUBJECT: E. Howard Hunt Lot spoke with Fig Coleman about Hunt's assignment to Spain. I had ‘spoken with him back in August when we were inquiring fato, roported activities involving Mrs. Hunt, oe Coleman said that he got out of the War College in May 1964 (by. whigh he fixed the time), and took over the Iberian desk, Bill. Ryan was C/EUR (or was it WE Division at the.time),’ In early autumn “Ryan said that he had just been informed by the DDP (Karamesaines). : las DCOS, .as a directed assign- - ment by Helms. A memo was prepared and sent to the COS, | that Hunt was to bé assigned to There was nothing further for about a month when Ryan. (now retired). stating called Colemar in and showed him a RYBAT letter from that Ambassador Stanley J. Woodward would net have Hunt: in the ; Embassy, 3. - Woodward had ‘been the Ambassador to Uruguay when Hunt © “wis COS Moitev ideo. He hada low opinion of Hunt and was counting the days uritil Hunt left.. The President of Uruguay visited Preaident- ee Eisenhower in the States, at. which time he requested a personal ‘favor-- ~ that Hunt be reassigned to. Montevideo.. - a Se Hunt took. another, tour. - Woodward was outraged, and had his revenge i in 11964 when Huat was to, be” sent. as DCOS. to 7 oe 4, Aftera couple of months--early 1965--Ryan. éalled Coleman 7 in and, observing that there was more than one way to skin a cat, : This- didn! t Fequire anything special, Ryan saying that he’ didn't know, It carie to him’ from Kararnessines on Helms! order. nothing’ for thé station, Hunt was to submit’ administrative vouchers for reimbursement of his, expenses and they were'to be paid. Coleman ~ said he never saw Hunt before he went out. He knows that there was no operational reporting, to indicate that Hunt was ‘doing anything. , [Pasa me ae ae get cee 2 +
14-00000 FB CEES Am Cleee y \ : . Sete Petite res, PFS. C380 ce WY Sertap ‘attal 2g * > f @ ald Tht eM eR SY Te0 erneE Sea e ont GATE oT PERI ATYE Th METAR harm geet BE ea beet Rp le Py top bed WMT ELE p80." Yoong en, Naess, ae vbirmeit idl . \. ‘ The vouchers were ‘not large, although the doctimentation was poor, Coleman raised the question with Ryan about his signing off, and Ryan said he could talk to Karamessines if he wished. Because Coleman had a close personal ‘association With Karamessines he did Just that. He was told -by Karamessines that he didn't know much about it cither--"Helms said send him out,"' He was instructed to go ahead. — 5. In early. July 1966 (4 July) Coleman. went to Madrid. He” ~~ ada ten day turnover with Hunt had already gone and he did not: see him,. said he didn't know what Hunt did, but that Coleman need not worry because. he was gone, y 6. Several months ago[|__|was ata seminar at which _ , ‘Ambassador Woodward was also present, -At the time he asked about Hint, Woodward said it'might still be dragged into the press, '. Tad Szule had been after Woodward about the Hunt assignment to ' Spain. Coleman observed that Szule did have along article on Hunt in the New York Times, and the Spain assignment was mentioned, | but without any conclusions as to its significance. _ 7 Coleman said the RYBAT file of C/EUR may have something on the event, but not much, A letter out and the reply, but not much more, “S. D. Breckinridge. ome Poe eae ead nL a nee Oh Ere stvestew. tress. Lae te 3 %, y §
iced cre TUNA Seelam a2 p20 stones. SUP rp eee Le eg pet SAYS Say ever ge uaertoy, ee de B ne ea . 22 Februaty. 1974 eee | ZG Fake Hab BL MEMORANDUM FOR THE. RECORD SUBJECT: E. Howard Hunt--Madrid Assignment ‘1. On 22 February 1974, Mr. Frederick. N. Evans” and. the undersigned interviewed Mr. Edward Ryan, “Chief, Staff D, Deputy. Director for Operations, on’ - * the subject of Mr..E. Howard Hunt. aris) the period | of Mr. Hunt's assignment asa ‘Contract *: Gee A agent to Madrid between July 1965 and Septembe”’ 1966, -Mr. Ryan had been the. Deputy Chief of the Western European 7 ‘Division, Deputy: Director for Plans. The purpose of the interview was to determine if Mr. Ryan had any ‘information bearing on the matter of the’ operational . assignment of Mr. Hust during this. period. - "was unaware of any specific project.or target for Mr. _= Hunt. | Mr. Ryan made the specific observation that if Mr. Hane produced ° positive intelligence on the Iberian” ‘target-during this: period the officials responsible: 2. Mr. Ryan. stated that the assignment of Mr. ‘Hunt’ both to the European Division and to. Madrid was. handled without benefit of the routine processing procedures through the Western European Division. Mr. Hunt's assignment was coordinated and directed ’ by Mr.’ Thomas Karanessines, the Assistant Deputy Director : for Plans. With regard to operational duties, Mr. Ryan: for this effort: within. the. Western European Division. . were. totally. unaware - .of: it... a a a 3.° Mr. Ryan stated that most of his. knowledge 2 of Mr. Hunt's activity and the nature of his. assignment during this period came more. through heaysay than a L direct official Khowledgé. For example, he cited the | comment ‘made by a mutual ‘acquaintan¢e: of his and Mr. Hunt's to the effect that-Mr.. Hunt ‘stated: that ‘while in Madrid he was going to "play golf and write books." <> * Me. Ryan was asked-s pecifically whether’ or not he was : a F
14-00000 t ita ibeutie aieie nates SPC OI MES waa PEIN Heo Pees Wae PEC WS ea beet mer FU ete Bhagat e SME te) UST ae dosy cpp en wantin tertned zs ACES #5 ie Lae Serta ic hn iy < ie. ry &. &: it i under thd impression that Nr. period. | Hunc's writing activities were cither being encouraged or subsidized directly by this Agency in any official effort. Mr. Ryan ree sponded that he was personally not aware of any such arrangement. He added as an-expression of personal opinion that Mr. Hunt had no operations! function and was simply granted the opportunity to write books. for his own personal gain at Government expense during this ja: i “Lavrgice J. Howe. - iect ee i oy Ei ob tae eens ee it hea Tod Ase Sait aa aS ne ON Rada Li iste aa Sale diet a, We mane tetanus nee cowie: Ain i et
14-00000 . - . _ _ LET.NOEW With CHECK CLASS TION TOP AND UOT TOM —. : LACLASSIFIED T wtipestiag [OT sxcrer ( o IMETIALS . ty = . i ; PREPARE REPLY. ! RECOMMENDATION ; : ' . ‘ 3 i i : Q : § , Pe i 4 it - t 7 wd : Ba 3 Yeon FE vo > < ~ . , . i ~ , FOLO HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER rv “FROM: NAME, ADORESS AND PHONE NO. ipo OMIG/I2ZE24 Has. (5527 ne rT ee tise" previous editions t40) t “yer ae * Pree " . - Jf 1 . . - 7 . ; ‘ g x :
CHATS Mg wap tases nt * Cau tee Doe a eee eae ona Set, en * cn ’ pe tate: MAPS ace em etre Ye he MH aa tees pouy ng CART ag ate, Sart Laer ‘ EES PAY Deer paceg ss YE tendon 9 ite af we biter as SP eg Foal nae . cm ne meee rh to inti a - ‘ : . i - io” 22 February 1974 | MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD . _ SUBJECT: Conversation with Sam Halpern’. in GClo,; where he is cleanin ".. his new assignment as DC/D¢ attempt to reconstruct Howard Hunt? . have of Hunt's assignment in Spain " aSsigarnent. . on their own. , of the DD/P shortly before Helms became DDCI, - someone might talk to Evan Parker w  Imet with Sam ‘Halpern for about. 20 minutes this morning an ing bp some details before Ke Boes to CD.: Itold him generally about our S assignments and financial transactions, and asked him particalarly-for recollections he may in mid~1965 te the fall of 1966, pern said that he has no recollection about such an In June 1965 he moved from WH Division with Des FitzGerald when he became tha DD/P.. At. about that time oo: Halpern's father died and he was-in New. York for the funeral and ten days of religious observations following that.~ He was back’ in mid-June and in and out from then on.as he got ‘ready to attend the National War College which began in August.. He did not- return to. that office until the end of June 1966. ; , . 4 “'2, Hal BO 3. Halpern observed that-doring this period Karamessines. ; was ADDP: with Helms moving up to be DDCI. He thought it entirely | ‘possible that Helms. and Karamessines ‘could have handled this an “4s “Halpern said that Evan Parker had come into the office _ and had returned - from Honolulu for that purpose, He stayed’on for FitzGerale until Halpérn returned from the National War College: He suggésted “ho may have known something abaut it. (although he may not); He also suggested. talking to Georgia, S..D. Breckinridge | * . ~~ Cranry LineetMPOIT CL BY Xeon 4 ene awe ae Sy
PYAR BRE) ree pe ate ee pte PR aN ON ree gay cet, 7 t6 Fils 12, Rh ry 21 February 1974 . Lode i, ; NEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD | SUBJECT: Watergate--Frank A. O'Malley’ - 1.' At 3 p.mi.on the afternoon of -19 Bebruary 1974, ’ Mr.‘ Frederick N. Evans and Lawrence J. Howe interviewed . | Mr. Frank A. O'Malley at his residence, 6419 Lakeview Drive, Falls Church, Virginia.! Mr. O'Malley retired from this- Agency in June o£ 1972. Prior to ¥vétirement Mr. O'Malley was an officer in the External Employment Myers DPSS gasp had been instrumental in the placement of Mr. -E TE iene OCS a Net me tian Fi 7 Assistance Branch, Retirement Activities Division of - the Office cf Personnel. It was Mr. O'Malley's function to assist personnel retiring fron this. Agency in finding post-retirement employment. In this capacity Mr. O'Malley ¢ Howard... Mullen public: relations firm, The attempt tq dotermine if —_ . eveloped from Mr; O'Malley rt, Hunt-with the Mallen — Hunt in the Robert R} purpose of this interview was to additional information could be a With regard to the placement of M .-- 2. Mr. O'Malley, began the interview by: recalling ~~ o _ the nature: of his past Agency associations both with Mr, ; _Hunt. and the Muilen Company.’ ir. O'Malley stated that “prior to assuming his responsibilities in thé Office of | ‘Personnel he had served with Central Cover Staff iw the - area dealing with. the funding of covert action projects. - In this capacity he had become familiar with the acti- — ‘vities of Mr. Hunt while Mr. Hunt functioned on the Covert - . Activities Staff primarily in the propaganda field. . Mr. O'Malley stated that he first came in contact with the: Mullen Company when he Was attempting ig find an .organi-~- ', Zation to handle the public relations effort of a covert Agency activity khown @s the Free Cuba Conmitted. Mr. O'Malley related that he had arranged this cover through | the Christianform Organization end that his duties ‘in- volved ail aspects of. the funding of this activity. Mr. - O'Nalley described the mature of his working relationship i 4. % tT
14-00000 bee Pha COPE Cet sera hh gag tar ORF pies a oe tds eb, assistance through the Office of - with Mr. Robert R. Mullen us Seing close ang cordial.  « Mir. O'Malley stated that Mr. Mullen was in the qubies , of confiding to hin information couceraing Other Mullen business concacts and Projects. In response to a specific question, Mr. O'Malley Scaced that duting the “Period of his contact with the Nallen Company dealing with the Free Cuba Committee, Mr. Mullen told him the Howard Hughes Organization was a client of the concern. 3.0 Nr. O'Malley reiterated his previous stateients. a that Mr. Hune was -referred to his office for placement the Executive Director,. then Colonel L. X. White, Mr. O'Nalley ‘stated that in. - view of -Mr, Hunt's interests in the public relations field, it was thought advisable’to put Mr. Hunt in touch with Mr. Robert Mullen for the purpose of gaining the. benefit-of Mr. Mullen's guidance. Mr, O'Malley recalled, after the initial meeting, Mr. Mullen mentioned having met Mr. Hunt some. years previously in Paris, France, Mr. O'Malley's office arranged interviews with various Organiz?tions including Readerts Digest and the Kennecott |. + Copper Company. Through the offices of the Mullen Company: - an interview was arranged with the ssneral Foods Corpora- tion, a Mallen client. -Mr., O'Malley stated there was. ‘disappointment that Mr. Hunt had. been unsuccessful in “selling himself" during any of these interviews and that no job offers had resulted. In response to a question | aS to whether or not executive level interest was. still being shown in Mr. Hunt's post-enraloyment placement, tle. O'Malley recalled that. Mr. Richard Helms, then ‘Director of Central Intelligence, was listed as a charac-. ter reference on Mr. Hunt's resume and that Mr. Helms: “ Signed a ‘letter of recommsadation to the Kennecott Copper Company on MeoeHunt’s behalf. Mr. O'Maljey recalled being —- ' contacted in. the last month of Nr. Hunt's Agency Service by ‘t. Mullen,. who stated that -2 decision had been made: to”... €xpand their operations. In view of this expansion, Mr. ~ Mullen, had decided ‘he would -hinself offer Mr. Hunt a. job. Mr. MulYen had Stated. that Re was interested in having Mr.- ‘Huat begin work innediately. However, Mr... "Malley re- | - Called. that Mr. Hunt completed retirenent’ formalities and. actually started work for the Nullen. Company approximately. “a week to 10 days later. - oy : wv ay
14-00000 . “. fir, O'Malley stated that contact was maintaiaed. " - With Me. flung while at the Mullen Company en x continuing . basis, because Mr. "Malley was interested in CS LS for possible referral of other ‘Ayency. retires. Meso. O'Malley also understood that there was Cover ant Com-- : mercial Stafl interest in the Mullen Company, ard that : ae Ne. Hunt becane instrumental in discussing Several aspects a ~ of the cover Operations in. his Capacity as an officer of _ . a / . the company. - hr, O'Malley recalled referring various Ss , c Agency officers ‘to Mr. Hunt -for guidance when these—indi- . Co viduals expressed an interest in entering the public woe _ Trélations field, “Mr. O'Malley did recall disappointment __ a _ an feeling Mr. Hunt had generally been less helpful on ae '. these océasions, 7 : oe Oe ee . - 3. Mr.’ Hunt contacted Mr, O'Malley on several occasions~.° .. Tequesting referral of retiring Agency employees with ° — specific qualifications, These ‘instances occurred apparent- _i ly lafter Mr, Hunt had assumsd his responsibilities with “"" the White House. fn one instance Mr. Hunt requested re- ‘ferral of a recently retired Agency SeCretary. As-in--. ANE RTE Sgt Rota hep ® Previous memoranda and discussions, Mr, O'Mailey was “unable en . to recall the name of this individual, He did, however, ; x State that he is quite certain Mr. Hunt turned down the |. a £ - individual whoa he referred. As a point of Clarification, : Peas Ph ~ hit. O'Malley said that this individual had not Previously - 4 me been known to Mr. Hunt,-nor had she previously worked : ; nm for him in any capacity. Mr; O'Malley also recalled. a. : ; E ' -Fequest. from Mr. Hunt for an individual having skilis in — , 4 : the area of locks and Surreptitious entry. A Tesume of Beet Mr. Thomas C. Amato Was provided to Nr. Hunt at that: time. ot - Atsis Mr. O'Malley's recollection that Mr. “Hunt. specifically | og a Stated that a person with Mr, Amato's qualifications WAST a “J needed in connection with a requirement of the Howard Ce, hoe vo, Hughes Organization in ‘Las Vegas, Nevada. Mr. G'Nalley cr moe. ‘Stated. the opinion’ that it was his impression that the oe -) €bties involved vould include the monitoring of a listening ~ | device in aa undisclosed location. Nr. O'Malley reiterated a — Ris understanding that Mr. Anato did not accept Nr. Kurt's —~ So de 2 (, . ,@ffer of cmployment.  _ | a oo Do H BO Spek 6. Mir G'Malley then recalled request. from.Mr. Hunt - : Pos . fora recomnendation. of a security service organization ‘ EB _ ,to<arry out an electronic countermeasures "sweep." Nr. 3 7 ‘O'MAlley recommended the. Wackenhut Corporation, ss — - £ DY - : : boy iG : i ~ ' : ‘ & rm)
74-90000 SRR eS aon ite * *% af zs O'Malley recalled that Nr. thine expressed di tenet? With thet Sucecstion in Part hecsuse of Wat Mel Hoag Viewod as that firm's Politica) erienter: Me. O'Malley did not elaborate further on that remark, Nr. O'Malley then Sugsested the vse of Anderson security Consultants Incor orated, 7 Mr. O'MaT Tey stated that insofar as this: Organization was advertised in the yellow pages and that Mr. Hunt could be assured of the reliability of the Ser~ | Wices, he felt this to be a reasonable Sugvestion. — Mr, «| O'Malley stated that during a subsequent. phone call when | Kr. O'Malley asked how his suggestion. had worked out, | Mr. Hunt responded, "Yes, they had done a fine job." At this point Mr, O'Malley was asked whether or not fron | his associations with Mr. Hunt he felt Mr. Hunt was in. | the habit of making lib coments which were not neces- Sarily acctrate in order to pass over a Subject. Mri \ O'Nalley stated that this WaS categorically so. He said: he was sure -that Me. Hunt had lied to hin on a number of”. occasions and that, therefore, he was in no Position to . be sure that Mr. Hunt’ had actually, in face, used the Services of Anderson Security Consultants. Mr, O'Malley VOlunteered the Opinion that he Suspected the electronic countermeasures "sweep" was to be carried out in the offices of the Committee to Re-elect the President, | -#. In response to a question ds to whether He had ever referred anyone to NeCord Associates, tr. O'Malley — replied that he remembered having referred Walter Brayden, ‘Mr. Brayden for a time acted as bodyguard to Mrs. Martha Nitchell. As an aside hr. O'Nalley mentioned that Mr, Brayden had refused. to carry a firearm in Spite of the .  €act that Mr. McCord told hin he could do SO On the atithor- "ity of the Attorney General. psked specifically if he had » ever referred either William Shea or Teresa Shea to Mr. | NcCord, Mr. O'Malley Stated’ that he did not recall spéecif- ically referring Teresa Shea and that he was Sure that he had not referred William Shea to hin. So, contrary to, previous Statements, it is now Mr. O'Malley's belief that ~in-all probability Mrs. Shea was not referred by this ' Agency: tovhr. McCord: - ~ Yet seme viet tel AP Bey tier ga
74-90000 Madrid. - . ata 8. Ret. ning to Mr. O'Malley's: prlvious responsibilities in coordinating: funding for the covert action activities. Of Mr. E. Howard Hunt, the issue WaS raised as to whether Or not the funding of Mr; Hunt's projects continued betwoen aJuly 1955 ard Septenbyr 1956 while Me. Hunt was a contract ‘enployee stationed at Nadrid, Spain. Mr. O'Malley recalled that at the tine of Mr. Hunt's assignment to Nadrid the Sluwcenivai arsseminated for Consumption within the Agency was that Mr. Hune Was retiring. Mr, O'Malley stated that this was net generally believed. Mr. O'Malley was quite certain that during this period his office handled no project funding for Mr. Hunt. In response to specific question Mr, O'Malley stated that on Me. Hunt's return to Staff employment the Projects and funding which Stopped in July. 1965 were again tesumed. Nr. O'Malley was not aware .. of any project names or funding mechanisms or Post-assignment accountings in connection with. Mr. Hunt's activities in | “Frederick Nn. Evans ~ . a : , \Gisltrid fare “ J Lawrened J. Howe | aX? An net st Sie ewe 4 Man ge cet ved ote ENC met tai aide aewiace sons,
14-00000 4 « . e - £ ry ( ( Ld dem a= wt a ( x a bodice ut : , ‘ Loews . vet " : . 21 Fobruary 1974 Oy a2 an i MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD | ; _ SUBJECT: Office of Finance Records - K. Howard Hunt . oe - + 4S" On the instruction of Mr. Steven L: Kuhn, Chief a. Boe of Operations, PSI, the undersigned made an appointment — re for the afternoon of 206 Februdry 1974 to interview. Mr, pot _ ‘Willian Caugisld, Chief, Certification and Lister Divie z Sion, Office of Finance, and Nr. | los Pinance Bot ‘.. | On the subject of Mr. BE. Howard HintS AE the Outset of the intarview Mr. Caufield advised the undersigned that instruction had deen received from the Director of the | a oe Oxfice of Finance, My. Thomas Yale, that discussion on So yet . the subject of Mr. Hunt -was to be. carried out’ only with the Office’ of tha Inspector General, Mr. Caufleld Stated that’ he had inforned Mr..Yale of the requested interviow and had received this instruction with the-sugrestion ; . ‘ that the undersigned contact Mr. Yale directly with any oof Anguiry. ; fo me ‘ 2 Accompaniad by Mr. Caufield, the undersigned ' brisfed. Mr. Yale on the nature of ths request and idane- . ae - oo ‘tified the “Task Force" ‘effort being undertaken by the Office of Security in concert: with the Offices of the a eo -: Inspector Genarak and Legislative Counsel. Mr. Yale - , , oT " -Fespondad: that he recognized the isgitimacy.of the in- Fe ot quiry. Mr. Yals explained! that sudsequent to initiation | : ' OF the complats audit being undertaken by. Mr J OE wr i ‘the Audit. Staff, the Deputy Director for Management and oo Setvices, ‘Mr, Harold L..8rownman, had requested ths 4 Oftica of Fiaance to discontinue their invastication of - : ok ' itr. Hent to avoid duplication. Mr, Yale added paran- “ Tg, Coes -thetically that it was the ‘naturs of Finance Officers. 8 yt Oe not to TPsave a jod halfidono and thaz én ,"informal™. ; inquiry tate Mr. "Hunt's £inane ial records had nevertha- - , ; - less continued at a more subdued pace, . _ So ta : bog, bog E2 IMPDET oo
14-00000 pay 8 t ~ wf < we: as ee, he ote 3. A revisw of tho ciréunstances surrounding Mr. - Hunt's conversion to Contract Type A employment and ass ent was than undertaken by Messrs. Yalo, Caufield, and the undersigned. Tho contract and payroll filos of Mr. Hunt wore reviowsad for posslblo indications of the nature of the operational activity undertaken in Madrid. <A review of travel voucherg indicated that Mr, -Hunt and his family made accountings indicating departurs tron Washington, | » C., on 5 August 1965 with un arrival in: Madrid, Spain, on-16 August 1965. The costs of this. . travel: were charged to the budget of the Western Heni- - in sphere Division, Deputy Directorate for Plans, ; "Station Support. account, A subsequent accounting sume lemarized PCS travel expenses and-included a payment for .aparthent rental for 16, 17 and 18 August 1965 with s -". payment in the amount of $125 to Mr.) ‘| for this purpose, o . OO - / 4. It was datermined that an allottee bank account in Mr. Hunt's name had been established at the Riggs National Bank of Washington. Ali Salary and other non- ' ‘operational reimbursements were made to Mr. Hunt through Sterile check 'to this account. An Operational account was established for Mr. Hunt with the Chase Manhattag Bank of New York City. A review of all paymants mady to Mr, Hunt through the Chase bank account through Mr, Hunt's operational advance subsidiary account, Or 1442 account, ‘had been made, There was no record of any. operational accounts. or advances being processed through this. channel. Bir. Yals Stated that this fact defined his concern, He ‘felt that “te was inconceivable that Mr. Hune could. havs undortaken operational activity without sang transfer of or ‘accounting for funds, To data, no such records have been developed. No referance to a project or Project. ‘digraph or operational FAN number has been located, AL.  expensés connected with Mr oH nt identified to dats werg Charcved to the Support. A review made of . Tecords hag not indicated iny "Developmental on sarget of Opportunity (54To)" funds or "Other Overa- tional Activity (COA)" funds expended by or on behalf of Mr. Hunt. These two accounts would normally be ths Sources. of operational funding not charged against a Specific pro- . ject activi: . SP te sj Gal lirreiisl uP woh we
74-90000 5. A review of all of the travel vouchers on record for Mr, iiunt during tals veriog alse failed to identify a project. In addition to cho PCS and return vouchers, two orhor =€countiags ara O2 record, Cne accounting covered a trip by the entire Hunt family to Paris "gop the renewal of visas." A second voucher covered a TDY ‘trip fron. Madrid to Washington with roturn to Madrid mada by Mr. Hunt from 5. January to 3 January 1966, Tho - voucher States in. tha Space provided for the citation of - tne trayel order nugher ~ 15 travol order,” the account~ ing, was approved and siened by Mr, Thomas Xaramessines, » ‘thon Deputy Director for Plans, No justification or Statement of purpose for this Tpy Wa3 given on the accounte 6. Mr. Yale detersined that further review of possibia Sourcas or identification of operational funding wag in order, Mr. Yale gaye instructions that the entire 1442. advance account. of Mr, Hunt be Trevlewed for other possible channels of funding Outside of the New York Chase account, After discussion, it Wa3 agreed that particular attention bs taken to any items Connected with Publishing or book - Foyalties. Mr, Yale noted that the royalty offset waiver: Provision anmended to Mr. Hunt's contract was, in ais ex- perience, somewhat unusual, 0 Ca Fe Mr. Yala ‘was infornea by the undorsiened o£ the intention to interview ur, Edward Ryan,. currently Chief, - Division D, who was at the tine of Mr. Hunt's Madrid assign- ment, Deputy Chiaf of the Western Henisphere. Division. Mr. Yala SUgzested that Mr, Davis Payer) also. he interviewed. me Tha undersigned informed “Mr. Yale that this had déen done. and briefed Mr. Yale on the generally negative results of .. too -interview, Mr. Yala’ then Fecomended that Mr. Sag : Halperatbe interviowed. Mr. Yale noted that Mr. Hainera - = T58, bee aa assistant to Me. Deseord Fitzgerald when the. ut latter was’ Chief, esteth Hehisphere Division ann had ae=— Sompaniod ur. Fitzzerald when he becane Deputy Diractor fay Plans, Mr.c¥dle recalled that subsequent to HP. Fitzserald’s Passing that cMe, Halpera remained on the Start and acted as an Pxecutivs Officer for ur, Thomas Zaranessines. Hr. Yale “Stated that from his experience, ° Karamessinss would , have dalesatad 411 the arranzing of “details Surrounding: UA assignnent such as Ar. Hunt's to Mr. Halpern. an Yale offered iareparentastical observation of nis Surprise ae What he interpreted to by reticence to date to intervewy: — 3. Halvern,
74-90000 ® ° Tp Ogee er om - J . —~(  S20ntt sayy: un _ ( - 7 ‘ aoa! - - 8. The undersigned 4Ssured Mr, Yale that he would be” pr. "  4nformed of any information identifying any possible project : p activity developed in subsequent investization.. Mr. Yale Stated that- any information in this area would greatly . ; | facilitate the job of checking conputorized financial mS records, os os + Lawrence J. Howe . “y in 3 ; i } i an 2 1 *
14-00000 <A eee we ple emma ec entenn o CHASE MANEATTAN HAMK ACCOUNT tnt ae tO oremieneieeetdt Date Payee - . “Agount s 8 _ 20 October, 1965 Unknown -  $ 2,650.00.—: i (2 months rent as Ceposit plus 1 month - i i. in advance at $550 per month. -Substan- : _ tiated by lease) 7 : ; mo ; 9. 26 November, 1965 Casa Guggenbuhi 9 $69.34. | (for storage of trunks during 3 mos. . | SE ‘November 13, 1965 - December 20, 1965 - temporary housing) - oo - be. - Yo 10 December, 1965 _ Security Storage Co. $ 1,070.82- . “(final destination charges per attached . invoice. Insurence charge of $1.00 is . .personal expense.) ” ; eee ee r # ¢ $$ 8 @ @ - Expenses mobenses MeO SI Fo ay cette etm, Flowers for Sra. de Max Borrell Ptas. 150 1 Me vee i. Dinner at Housé of Ming, (| -Ptas.°2250 37 '.Ex-Bolivian Ambassador and wife, ° cp ee a ee (Per my letterof°21 December, 1965): pep 3 bo MARA 8 me Coates ont QS, . Bewaka Sune Ms ms | ~ f ‘y 4
14-00000 ‘ ‘ i Cte BOO Ww erate . SERVICES OTHER THAN’ PERSQHAL” Terence CRARANAC | ou |. OJUODZ TLGeuiU oe ane, ness wt om me toeecreccaeentnnsttetesee ~ cette Ae eect ae ESA ° OtKen: sts Sf €ePewo Tae. artace G@ECEEPTS and Ofna “gurpeutine Bocuwrate. . auOine nee a ee et 1s Nov i1965 Flowers for Sra. de Max Borrell. Pesetas 150 6 60/$). 00 —~ $2.50 20 Dec 1965 Dinner at House of Ming. Ex-Bolivian Ambassador and wife, ; - : f , ; : Pesetas 2250 @ 60/$1,00 $37.50 * _ 46,00 i : For cporational security reasors a ‘raced ipt was not obtained, ue —_ 2 (creat the’ usb. 2 advance account.) . . oe oo ed “G aathacden op agent, chase aigaaraze apgsere B . ° GO POEF BHO CHE IO 88 rem emmnemnat! OFF 08d Pemite Bebalf ood achneetetgs sorsipt of aued fueds aad oy rorpore dee teoreter: whee pasd #0 ap opera. “SQTIFY THAT. THE DISBURSEMENTS ITEMIZED ADOVE WERE NECESSARILY MADE OY NE IN THe CONDUCT “SEB IC LAL BUSINCSS OF A CONFIDENTIAL. EXTRAORDINARY, CR EMERGENCY NATURE, THAT {HAVE NOT a NOR WILL § DE. SEINMURSED THCREFGR FROMANY CTNER SOURCE, ANO THAT THIS CLAIM AND AT. THMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. . § ie. name attachment) SbSwmaTUse oF Chatman st $I TGWATURE OF AGENT |_GEATIFY FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE “CE. WO] CHARGE Fan ACCOUNT RO. -2282 | 6138-1347 (code 3) a t : | AUTHORITED si cnarude RECEIPT “Fon FUNDS RECCIVED PAYWENT RECEIVED : Oa) Im THE AMGUNT OF 3 +tG508=-. “irr Qk Stcnaruns or [] pavec [} acear Pe ee Po so ; SPACE Brice FoR EXCLUSIVE USE OF OFF ICE/OF FINANZE ‘ : 35-66 ‘SCALPTION-aLt OTHER! accounts 13-33 a , : i" account symoo8, . Descaretion . . IVANCE acCOUNTS 18-87 SY “e@sestre Seavraug - fortiaug” emer ee we oceans ite rma cy uelinen a 2 . . tag) ERR Mase AL POALRTIO MC woe - GRATION APO OSTA a musta . Tyee Re melo tena tae St
14-0000 : . . Bes ' : “a PES to Madrid - - Per dicn/misc exp - ‘3 998,30 ne a Lo. ‘ ‘Air fare. (selé § fanity) 2,257.50 a HHE, POV, etc 1,547.76 : ‘TLA, quarters, etc — 6,662.00 + ; a oo Education allowance | 1,440.00 $18,905.56 | Emp aa ene cone TOE Madria/Paris ~ - reentry visa | " 384.61 . 2 Air fare only for self, & fanity . PCS to Has. - Per dien/atae exp | a 178.82 Air fare (self & family) — 1, » 394.55 7 HHE, POV, ete “10, 731.97, . Gg TLA 0 599.34 12,904.68 2 : "Operational entertainment - Madrid Nov. 65 40.00 Approved expenditure - ~ LXD - Madrid 1 L July 1966. 1,600.00 | Total expenditures: $33,834.35 * Less. advances. ‘received (bank de osit, - $30,0003. . ) 33) s00.00- ee | cash $3,500) Cpt TRERESESES ‘Cash settlement to ‘elose AG oo, i yt a $ 334.85
1S February 1974. MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD ., SUBJECT: - Interview of Mr. Davis Powell ——-—-.. ON the David. Sz. John Novels 1. On the morning of 15 February 1974, the p undersigned interviewed Mr. Davis Powoll, currently ~&@ Budget Officer on the Staff of the Deputy Director for Management and Services. Mr, Powell is located: | ‘in Room 7C13, _ During 1965 Mr, Powell was Chief o£ - Support of the then designatsd Vester Europaan Divis _ Sion. .In July 1965 a contract was written authorizing Salary and. benefits to Mr. £. Howard Hunt for an assign=— . Ment.under non-official cover to Madrid, Spain. The purpose of this interview was to determing if Mr, Powell - had any information on Mir. Hunt's activities during this. period. J ‘be. Mr, Powell responded that from his recolloction it was Mr. Hunt's habit to deal only with the most senior officer available. In ‘this case Mr. Hunt dealt directly with -the ‘then Chief of Wastern Europsan Division, Mr. Rolf Kingsley. Mr. Powell statos that, in his capacity “as. Chief of Support, any activity undertaken to support Mr. Hunt's assignneat to. Madrid was undartaken second . - and thirdhand on Tecelot of instructions from Nr. Kingsley's | orfice. - He further Stated that he was never briszed on ; the purpose of Me. Hunt's mission and could add littlo in. ». terms of. speculation. MY. Powell recomnendod that. Me; Edward Ryan, who was then Deputy Chief of Western European Division, be contacted. MZ. Powell also Suggested that Miss Marcha Sevilla 5s interviewed, Mtiss Saville was the _Sxecutive Secretary ‘in VYestern European Division during tha 4 time that Mr. Hunts contract was writtén and Miss. Saville - 3 Subsequently served in Madrid’ herself, “Mr. Powell unde. Stands that Miss Seville is currently assigned to the Lng offices of the Chief, European Division.” . mo, Lavrence J. Howe LG Filey Rb Ace,
14-00000 | 45 February 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Interview of Mr, Rogers Brooks on the David St. John Novels . al 1. At 0930 oh the morning of 15 February 1974, the undersigned interviewed we Rogers Brooxs, Chief, - - Contract Personnel Division, Office of Pérsonnel. The purpose of this interview was to determine if Mr. 3 had any information not contained in the Cone . tract Personnel file of Mr. EB. Howard Hunt on the . dattér's activities whilo &@ Contract Type A employee, 2. Mr. Brooks summarized his recollections by Saying that, although it was not comnon practice it - was noe entirely unusual for highly sensitive contracts . "to be adainistered without the ‘contracting officor being made aware of the operational objective involved, Mr, 7 ing’ allowance, but he was question of offset and hous unable to recall any of the details, It was Mr. Brooks? - Suggestion thae the’ Officé"of Finance be contacted and. _ that their Contract personnel ¥ecords on. Mr. Hunt be. _ checkéd for information, Lawrence. J, Howe s LER L tat x nea deme egy ‘ e NE FR nee ate ate Can A D, wath,
14-00000 44 Fobruary: 1974 / F6 Fah, tt 33 MEMORANDUM FOR THE “RECORD _ SUBJECT: Interview with Mr. Raymond A, Rocca . or . On the David St." John Novels a Son the morning ‘of 14 February 1974 Messrs. - Frederick Evans and Lawrence Howe. interviewed Mr. Raymond Ay Rocea, Deputy Chief, Counter Intelligence Operstions, | |The purpose of tha inverview was to follow up on infor- — ' mation contained in Office of Security files which stated “the belief that individuals in‘ the Counter Intelligence Operations office had knowledge of tha writing activities a of Mr, E. Howard Hunt. This belief was a matter of record | in the files of the forner Security Research Staff and wag attributed to Mr. Paul Gaynor, now retired, and Mr. Edward Sayla, — . ; a, During this interview Mr. Roces was specifically askad whether or not he had knowledge of the existence of. any fora of official Sponsorship or encouragement to Mr. E. Howard Hunt to write novels to improve the image of this: Agency. - Additionally, Mr. Recea was asked whether or not any assistance’ was -ever requested of the Counter - intelligence Operations offico ‘ta be provided to Mr. Hunt. ~~ ot oo Sb “OY. whether or not that Staff had-ever had any relationship... - © 7... owith Mrv-Hunt- whatsoaver.. ‘In response to thess questions. re Me. “Rocca responded: "ton the: record” that he has no knowledge - of any such. arrangements nor at any tine was he party to.any - ~assistance or any Fequests for assistance to'Mr. Hunt. Mr. - - oly wee ES “_. Rocca stated that the partictlar.section which he had been mo cet most accively concerned in- the past years. was. responsible sor handling a variety of tasks categorized under the area See ey oo of “sotting the record ‘straight." ‘Za this sense, the "image". - a Po mission of the offica was to counter misinformation. cur-.- .- ee eo “rently in the media or otherwise. believed to-be part of an, | - ea “effort to discredit the Agency. (Mr. Rocca faelsy that any wb oe . TG assumption that Mr. Hunt was engaged in any form of Agoncy | - sponsored image activity would have. probably load to the. conclusion that it was done under the Counter Intalligence iS By Cperations. . However, Mr. Rocca emphatically stated that oO So this was not the Case. an
14-0000 fo fon - f . i _ “ 3. Mr. Rocéa was thoroughly candid and cooperative é : during the course of this interview. He was unable to Suggest altornato means of attenotiag to determine Lf ‘any official Agency Sponsorship of Mr. HMunt did in fact exist. Mr. Rocca did venture tha opinion that he felt that in all probability an official acquiescence on the than an official sponsorship. It was agreed by all in this discuSsion that tha nature of any informal support .' given to- Mr. Hunt would be far more difficult to define ‘~. im the. absence of any formalized: agreenents,. SO BO os Lawrance J. Howe... | part of senior officials aight-have been involved rather ~ EOE oe ere he 03 2 bern annie, PE ee aE ames Oye AN er as sob PONT ase mei Lett, Hass SUS Aes tet: bate ¥0 toca |
14-00000 6 February 1974 - Se a , oA MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD my SUBJECT: Possible Agency Sponsorship of the | . ; 1G David St. John Novels > + The details: summarizing ai interview on 4 February . 1973 with Mr. Valter Pforzheimer, ;Cutator, Histerical © Us Intelligence Collection, were Set ‘forth in a uenorandin yo addressed to Mr. Steven L. Xuhn dated 6 Fobruary 1974, Mr. - yo, '. Kuhnwas briefed by the undersigned on this infornation. — 2 oe during the afternoon of § February, 1974, Later the same_ Z afternoon, at Mr. Kuhn's direction, a conforsnce was held - © With Messrs. Scott Breckenridge and. John Richards of the , Otfice of the Inspector General, a . A, 2, During this conférence the Speculation was entertained -. 2 . that Mr, E, Howard Hunt had, in Fact, been under Agency. _ a — Sponsorship with the knowledge of Mr. Richard Helms in his Lotte “preparation of 4 sériaa of Spy novels under the pseudonym, oe a David St. John IF it can be fiecepted ds a reasonasis a Lo  Supposition that Mr. Hust had some highly compartmented ~ (oe rr, : financial 2rTangonént authorized by senior Agency officials Be ii to write thega books, then it is likely that this Telation-— Sop. OS fo, . Saip continued after Mr. Huat officially retired. 1 ee wo Spseifically noted thar Nr, Hunt retired 30 April 1979, “ a “ Subsequent :to the retirement, a David St: John boak appeared _ | in print in 1971 and aaggher 4 1972, These pianiiscripts 7 _ W899 apparently prapared during thé time that Mr, Hunt was _ €xployad by the Robert Rs Mullan Companys, 2, : Ps eee etl |. henittieg-- ; : ___3+* Minutes froa the Offies 6¢ -daiered Counsel sake a Toterences -to-.a r 3 concern of Senator Saker over an Alleged | Financial relationship between Nr. Helms ahd Mr. Ttunt “which continued subsequént to Mr, Hunt's fornal Yetirement; .- Senator Baker has reportedly made reference ta a payseat ° . of some thirty thousand dollars with the PArénthoetical comment that -Mr.' Helms would aot have that amount of money . é
1400000 * PT EUR ay as = E. x is i ‘ TEN SPR EE ame Fea re ae pratt a aca Boe ; (. - ( : to provide Mr. Hunt from his private funds, Mr. Richards : ' OF the Inspector General Staff opinioned that if the . Ageacy had sponsored the St; John books, it was likely. that Mr. Hunt had so inforned Senator Baker. a 2: i) 4. “Adding possiblo weight to this line of Speculation - is the fact that subsequent to publi 1g 7 -, novel, Mr. Hunt published a nével ¢ : 5 is old Agency issued alias, Edward J. Haailton. The Suggestion is that this writing effort was do | £ree of any fiduciary relationship with the _ ain tha use of the St. John pen naxe, - S. Mr. Howard J. Osborn, Director of Security, was * # - a _ Mr. Kuhn on the evening of 5S February 1974, 2 e Lawrence J. Howe , & wh = oe ‘E e g Soe SOE Oa ga tes ne by Mr. Hunt Agency davolved. brisfed. on the above by the undarsigned in the- presence of \ eM ee, tae AEE nee Pe sade tn
14-00000 | i ws pacasss Us ne os 2 6 February-1974) 2 i yy ee MEMORANDUM FOR! Mr. - Steven L. Kuhn: 5 tet Yee * H 2° The David St. John Novels . rr Oe Ofetelmmaa vse: / 0 TAs: Oni4i February) 1974, Mr, Walter Pforzheimer, Curator,:., _ 4 Historical. Intelligence: Collection, was. interviewed by: the,. , undersigned: concerning his knowledge of a Series.of novels. : oh i _. | | written by Mr/: B.: Howard Hunt.. This interview was. undertaken. “2 f°” at your request..in an effort.to determine if Mr.-Hunt had id. ' acted in any. capacity in cooperation with Counter Intelligence — i . i | SUBJECT +, Operations, ““It-has previously: béen alleged in Office of . Security records that Massrs. Paul Gaynor and Edward Sayle co’) “Of, Security Research Staff, believed that Mr. Hunt. had written . | | . novels at Agency request and that this: effort had: been known. -- >> S| to Mr. James Angleton, Chief, CI Operations. °-...:.+ ‘colds tegg > H * . "- &e Mr. Pforzheimer provided a verbal. summar of hig-.....:. fh knovledgs of Mr. Hunt’s fictional writings under the pen... i _.name, David St. John. Mr. Pforzheimer stated. that when the » he ch.) €irst se. John book, On Hazardous Duty, appeared in 1965 fo .; undértook to identify the true name st the author. Mr. h a source in the copy-.. - tafe | Ptorzheimer related-that he checked wit oan “ _. right office only to find out that the true name was not given aed -, On the copyright application. The mailing address. given for. nab. _.. i othe author was checked against a telephone cros3 reference . — Pa. . . } directory, . The address on the copyright application. was..- f°; identified with Mr. BE. Howard Hunt. Mr. .-Pforsheimer stated. -. 2p ; | that after making the identification, he called Mr. Thomas £ : + Xaramessines and related his discovery... Mr. Pforzheimer - WO tegen ee cbc cee erate os -. .Fecalled from the nature of Mr; Karamessines' reaction that’ | po “he had uncovered a sensitive matter of senior officer concern. — - 1 ifr. Prorzheimer stated that he then recommended to Hyr.. a - ote n this thing °° - : Karamessines that "Lf the Agency is involved i h his address off the copy- - A, 1 ‘cwhy not .sée to it that Hunt’ leaves pdt ' “! right applications in the future." Mr. Karamessines reportedly 4 ; ie 1 at ae ‘ t : : | s p ; : ‘ i I
14-00000 Pe ut accepted the ‘suggestion and Mr. Pfortrheiner recalls that i oo subsequent copyright applacations wers ‘submitted without- - >  - ‘the address. Within five minutes of the. conversation with. -' Mr, Karamessines,. Mr. Pforzheiméer recalls being called by “Me, Richard Helms, then Deputy Director of Central. Intelligence. Mr. Pforsheimer recalls the substance of the conversation as ’ being, “for Christ sake Walter, this is the first book to,.-2 oe come along and say something good about the Agency." . My. a oe | nek -leave ‘the. Goddamn thing alone." nt . Tete Tt We eB The undersigned asked. Mer. Pfors hoiser, who to his : 7 2 Aqiowledge, would be in a position to confirm or dény whether = Mr. Hunt was undsr any form of Agency sponsorship inthis ~ 425. writing of the David St. John novels. Mr.— Pfortrheimer replied - 3. that he was never officially. briefed on the matter and thdt ~~ “fonly Mr. Helms or Mr. Karamessines could provide. the answer. | De Mr. Pforzheimer was then asked if either Mr. Angleton or Mr. 0 9-2. ‘Rocea of Counter Intelligence Operations.would have any ' ine ee knowledge of this activity. Mr, Pforzheimer replied that ) \: ° doubted “it seriously. 7 cabs tr. Pforzheiner went on to rélate that he was. Te, oécasionally tasked: to do research for Mr. Hunt. Heé Toealtea Tt on:one_ occasion being asked to résearch the Indian religious : . yites involving use of funeral pyres.” ‘Nes Pforzheimer \ remembered that this theme: figures significantly in Mr. Hune *s w) ; subsequent novel Tower of Silencd which appeared unde? the! ui ™*~*=é<“<;<‘“‘<‘é St. RN POND QM’ iD Mr. Dforzhoimer parenthetically eo, pointed out the origin of the pen nane as being the namés of ‘f i Mr. Hunt? $ two sons--David and, Sty John. | oes te be wi a tet ; 5. Tracing Mr. Hune!s caréor “assignments, ite ie hoted - EE ‘that he was: assigned. to the “Office - -of the Deputy Director. oP, for Operations then designated, the. DDP/Operations Group, in- The first David St. John book was published. . - _ February 1965. TE 7 "  . during 1965. | From June 1965 through Septénber | 1966, Mr,” Hunt Oe, was assigned to Madrid, Spain as a Contract. Agent. *patia ng. ee re -°* 1966, three St. John books : ‘appeared in print the highest ‘out- a “put for: any year. Mr. Hunt published one book under the oF St. John pseudonym in 1967,-and one each in the years 1968, De.) $969, 1971. and 1972. Hr. Hunt officially retired as an Agency o Stat Employes effective 30. April $9705
° . ry [ 4 : - . . ‘ _ f ¢ FY 4 ‘ lashsl Tabet see ea Ureseene aie 4 OCEAN SHAW AE: Sow sy te xe ELT Tinea ate es sty eden ES PERG Aenean si ey) FORAYS cecum ctegsy eB ate ” 6A check of Offices of Security records did not develop any indication. that any of the David St. John manuscripts were ever submitted for review in accordance with Agency. regulations. | There is. no documentary. evidence currently available to the 7: er confirm or deny possible Agercy Office of Security tos ‘sponsorship. of the books-written. by. Mrs Be Howard Hunt under. Oo fhe Pen RARE. David. Ste: ‘Johns - Pe a ee cote : aes aot of a — - wt teen LS -t . . : yoy : : = 7 OF acetate Om rene a, & . ~ : AN OFS cape ‘ UNL IAG ed NERS oh Ades td ated re ee EERE E ot yar ' NN rm mete wee) pnseieets yt Fy TAY Brera sata eg EE Ree feito oe RR aera LES ATR me an 7
‘feom the ; ‘and other activities which Were Confounding of any Agency involvement in that effort, __ — | that this activity Continued later, as he recalls it, tu CI Staff, and |. Of this business." : desired to improve the image Of the intelligence profession and the Agency 3 _ ahd that Huat's books. were.a-part of the Brogram.to do so. Mé-stated that: .: dor Ae * £ he sas neve: ” Fecievéd lead him: to belicve this was the Case, Oo Ls -* the issax: Ray Recéa ‘and. Walte Pforsheimer, both: of whom were involved of all the details = vee Agency to joih the’ public rélation gained the betiaf “that. Hunt wa's merely moving "Miss: Ethel Mendoza fairly eurrent on what he recall about what he had learne . . / aw mM . ~ mo —-  & SOBRE t Capy ons of one copies ¥.February 1974 - _ weet “MEMORANDUM FOR: :Mr. Kuhn: SUBJECT: General Gaynor's Recollections _ a ce a an os This date; ‘at your instruction, I called Gen. Paul FP, Gaynor - fe : > to seek his recollections regarding his knowledge of the writings of ; : Mr. Hunt and any official who might be aware of the circumstances ye a 2. Gen. Gaynor advised that his memory is not altogether clear a > , (on the Matter, and that he was "reaching, " but stated that has he- ne arr cola . | a He became aware that Hunt, While in WH, was accomplishing: aan pose a Steady flow of spy books, and that Security approval was not being re-_ quested on the manuscripts beforé ‘submission to publishers. (Ye Stated. rr 2greed with idea that the volume of writings was su(ficient to indicate ; that a greatof time was involved in Runt's writing, }. Gen, Gaynor advised ; that he raised the issue “up front" on several occasions, . The reaction : “he recieved to his raising the issue was that "keap your stinking nose out : He stated that. he was lead to believe that Mr. Helms = told outright that this was the case, but the kes pons és he an a He suggested that two people might ‘be able to-assist in clearing“: a 2 ‘in the "image" materials, | ‘He stated that Piorzheimér. seemed to be aware é gn an upto date. basis - of Huat's departure from the ns firm, to the desree that Gen. Gaynor os his desk outside the building,” He also advised that he kept) : was learning about Hunt's activities because she followed the case for him, and suggested that her .and.whén-and what resulted, might be | ds better than his at this date: ‘(He also’ mentioned an incident'in which Morse ~° : fvilen while on a TDY was told by a COS to isk Headquarters ‘te remove Hunt , Ares because of his direct liaison with the presitent of the conatry, Station operations, Later, the cos ‘but being paid by the same ‘source as before. tying the message, with the itmolication that thority in the Agency and the COS did not forse ~would crobably toid Morse to forget about rel. ‘unk was being directed by hisher au wish to get in the middle by complaining, He said) i
14-00000 ‘ , . = « ~ ¥ aaehsuae rae, : ‘ wee 2 = . Bee eet ee  e nae “> : . 7 ~- - on we ~ oe 7 . . . ; ; ie - . - ; . - oe, i ‘t + APE m Gan RED toes eontentami noes  . He also suggested that another person--de initely Pir Hunt--who might have some recall or have picked up inference ae . . . tire book-writing matter might be Anita Potocki of CI Staff former! et a Division D, (I gather that she did not have official knowledize but becauss i. 7 of her dislike for H nt, ‘she made it somewhat her business to follow. his oS - a ‘career, )- aT: cole wo, S i : : . 3 . ? cep ews tee SN ne ne a ee ame peels _ - ~ sos ve : . ; i } them hone
74-09000 . SESMORANDOU FOR: ‘Deputy 3 Directox for Support SUSSECT: : " Raquest- -for Sxcoption to Provision o2 ; 7 eR “45-lop Tareneg 3.  Cueanas G > 1. Tata wésiorandum contaizs a  Secomsiendatioa da pe a . graph 4 +. for the approval Os the Baouty Director for ‘sapporse £ Torence Ba case: {P} ig a Contre rack Employee as a atgned So the Madrid arsa in Stain in a sensitiys assiznnent. “ singe Als convergion: 2rom.2 St222 Eaplo7zse - ‘on 4 July 19635, - C2YBANAG was 2 GS-15, stev 7 (313,830.00 ser nnnun) asa aa is betas. pala at the same vate in hia present contract Status. Gis contract brovides that ta W322 bo eatitiad to a jjiving quarters allorance in conformance vith regulations L, oe ads organization applicrdle to its apposated bersonzel. 3. Tie baste 1s- tnx guartess allowances for Class i offizerd ia Yadria ig 32 9280 rer napun, Tho houge whic C2ABANAC nas located, with 2 One year 2awse irom 25 Novenmes 383 to 24 Novensar ises, nas an ananal ‘vest of 338, $60.00 - akeludiag ubatatios, Rherezors, ior rent sione, he vill be. ol, 959.CO ser ysar svar ¢ Re 160 sercént masini Sllowed ~ “shdar the provisions oz: Pe $5109... ox a. 73/25 per reant . shariag Saskia Oz ‘09 69 sereeat over the UALS: ers 3 aliovence,” AS woud: ‘De out Or: ‘poekst 32,595. ou. a | . a Bisa to the operat onal 3 SensiSivity of, exiactac’s assiinnent) his request” for 2 oz on Ais honsing’. costs was ailed Dy Us, Thoma3 Zara azessines, ADDR, . On a5. Septenter Wee Raraniessiaes, -AZE?, approved his hetae - seiabursed Pe) i 73/23 percent basis fox the .exucésa allowable c costs us $5, “Sh _ Sot to exceed, &9 percant above his quarters Silowares.. oad ‘guknorizatioa 739 - igelvded is a siotier. 2 to ORSBANAS Sboa EA: vanessines.§ xt 25 request is} that a9 Saputy. Dire sector: p ots i mee pecan ‘ Sateen ey ee ey i 2 ed Se ee ered sdusecibey Jy Siem cow kee 4
14-00000 . . . : ne eee meena eee, raed - Sor Supsort authosica . Aitavablo kosta up to he 75/25 percent shariag vu? tho oxeasa 4a ® percent sSove his quarters allowance. t Re a 2 ” Zavard, Syan . _ te 4 . . oe ting Chier * So. OE _ ee Uosters” ‘Parone Division Te Povéaseniiat sion ia pasagrapa a as Buthorized: - "9  Cetes x, Darts ees on et ESS. a eo Dake. COS Nee eae tile em apn Lamnom net nar ale aay aly yo SBR. Die Or Zor syosort —- x ; Ce ts rr cc : -BDP/7S/s3: Davies. Pomel/ai/si9 (sxo765) Dists abution: | ae crags. - CATE ee oe . x so . S3Aa-DD/S me -_ et . wae ERE oe a Meee ree “il - 7D . evas/ss 2 1 W2/L0 | Co tt . 3, 2a UB/PT ee, - i : a : 7 : t < 2 ~ 2. te a . 7 . fo is * i i ? : . i t . nade
14-00000 i / t Rete Ustie. 2 ~ fo ay ; 7 \ x Chis?, Wastera Turevs Matsioa ee . 13 Cetctar 1955 ATT. -2.. Supports Stak .-———~ oes an + a a. : Compensation and Tax Civiszicna Cfilice of Faaace - Buty States Nevorta-Teranes S. CUBINAC, Dsplozae dundver 179C80 a an en co feferenee 2 PHB 20-1CC0-1, paragraph Se Me "2,99 date tuers isno record of receipt of Poria 7h, ; ‘Tuty Status Eeports,. fox Tarenca S- CRARIIIC Siace Als DOD , “ & wuly 1965, Thesg rererts org requited in order to tainbain .. his leave acceunt in etcordanss wila the terns of parsevans fo *- 6(c) Cf h23 contract end to predlede action to withhol} pay in’ ' atcordance with Tequirsrents of tha referzticed Sendbecoe, . ae 2... Xt.da requested that this oPtce te advised ay to. the reason for the dalay in the submisslon oF tkase Duby Statng ee ale?, tee Contract S=ployees acconats: Sacticn’ Jog oo Ogs 2nsatiog aad fs Diyigion - , a Sgap2n Oo? Sina: Division a Sf OF Sxpzort, wy Division .- , 3 | Per conversation with ir, ‘Fe0ma3" Sarawessiies’ ADED, oe, t Sa Tereace S. CRBC. 2843 S£on]d be sag as the autherity a *O Continue Big Jay Witsout these PTeserts.: oe rs Davia 8, Foye} : ‘Calter op Sux tort : TE Division 8 eee few Sitkiet Yoo satteat: 30. iv) 2 e MOEA OER ane q g t ee ed ae mttee i 2 2 ¥
3 my, | vo royalties earned as a result . aq baling only a ‘Ligat One of ; vated the Ageacy will be mas £} be wiht receive no funda frod & has no- meanldg. io Subjects c ne © be (deleted fi freq Caaiuacts [ASR EMES ye pee 1. fhis oftide hereig- recomiends an anzends Supplement dated 4 July (1555, to delete ya ; hy om Further in future. cases whsy a Cove: a wii nos ba Técelyts ng fuads fFon corse it is ; Reragraph: ‘ba included in ‘Supplecenta. or Contracts: Om weeme. . . . 3 sso FOR: Catef, Contract Pe rsonael Divistoa.. ; RSFERSNCE. os A, occ Optoton 65-2470, datea 12 Augist 1955 BS Our Neo, dated 8 uy 1965, Sauce Gentesber 1945 suaracT 8 General (= Te=renés S. CRABANAC « - Supgiseat : Specific ~ Paragraph Entitle ed “Ortset® Subigée at to caanaacts ragrapa: 7. ent! ttled "Gffsat. 2o- This office Belacy: wledges the oce opinion, Re2orence A, which ; determiced CRABANAC my retata! iwithous Agsney sslary offset any future of his Alterary efforts based on ‘he Fact cover dozs not ineluda’ role oz a writer, | 3. As Subject’s euver - Yaetiuttios" have been offi a retlied Foreiga Service ng all aobit lezent paycent any cover, tats Paragzapa, Ontrack and it i Supple: iene J oe HILT Re cy WITTELD ee Covert Clains - eae eae 3 tenets cianty clariftea © OPficer for ‘ 3 and actually which ts Bi iead ing, ee 3 Eere soy reconnerded thas . ‘ : oa er is so Light 4 that Sisjece Freconrended that no *Orcast” eta 8 ate tty ly Pag ret ae henieoe ied th Re roe ne wee wormed Mtn di tina Feat Salle S90 ore inate Ske wet Pe ae has
teat rate watt an he a Ye / MEMORANDUM For: Chié£, Contract Personnel Division - *. OCC 65-2476, ° , 38 Ape, wi AY . om to as 235 SUBJECT: Terence $. CRABANAC - Retention of oO . Royalties bya Contract Employee S 7 You have requestéd the opinion of this Office in regard to the retention of future royalties which might be earned by Terence s. CRABANAC as a.result of his literary. efforts, We believe that he is. “entitled to retain such royalties Withous an offset against his Agency - 2.. We have been advised by ME. Geae Stevens, WE/Support, that _GRABANAG!s caver does not include the role of a writer; CRABANAGC!s cover for status will only be’a light ons-of a retired Foreign Servica ‘Officer, Therefore, patagraph 7 of his contract dated 4 July 1965 may ~ remain as written, Royalties from the fictional works, that he writes as "8 profitable hobby will ‘not bs emoluments received from or through his “cover activities." ; Po . rr a ee | + . | Office. of General Counsel. . eet ‘Chied, Covert Claims. Braach.: Mr. Gene Stevens, WE/Support. - a i “t - 1 eeenees “4 . { % had ; mm ame j 3 » 4 Penne d ee ee eee, Terimen 0. Blok lle ec a a HIST eee TNA OB ste i ;
14-00000 3. Aus an MEMORANDUM FOR 3: Otiles -of General Counsel ‘ ; ATTENTION 7 2 Norraaa Block i _SU3IECT 2 Terence s. Grabanuaé <- oo ~““Retéation of Royalties by: - i we 8. ‘Coatract Employes g - woos a4 . “2. Referonce is made to the telephone conversation’. j 7 oe of 24 July 1965 between yourself and Rogers C. Brooks of | 4 an thilu Office whercin background inforreation relating to the ; . wasignment of Terence S. Crabazac was discussed. , ee cos 2. Subject will 'apsarentdly-develoa a gover a3. awrher, : 7 | ; a fleld wherein ha haa an already demonstrated talent based =. | Jk. upon several publications. ‘The objective of the cover is to pro- a: vide.a basis of attribution for some of his incomes <Atthe thae =~ = ; we . ofthe preparation of Mr. Crabasac's contract, the specific ae Po. - detail of his cover was unknown. : , cy t- ms 3. Request your opinion ia regard to the retention of |’ oa, possible royalties earned by Crabanac a9 3 result of hig. ne +S terary efforts or whether such ‘income shduld be properly ~ . offact PORT IN Eee etn emt AERA CT nt f _ Josesh Be Ragan ar ms _Chiet, Contract ‘Personaal ‘Divisiea” we ee ee ed! ~ Attae chments. _ ; g- -OP/CPD: RCBrooks/cw: 2 August 1965 - - ct - " Distritsution: — es peo . . Orig & 1 -- Addressee tie anw
- aon, an ‘ . . ~ 1 Mr. Terence S. Crabanae V | Dear Mr. Crabanac: - ee a . po ' The Unalted States Government, ae re presents d byt the Contracting: | @flicer, hereby. contracts. with you asa Contract Employee for the uze of your Services and the Performance of duties of a ‘Confidsatial mature’ . uader the. following terms aad conditions: ' mS - lL, Comsen3aton. In full consideration for: the use of your, services . ‘and the performaace of Specified confident! ial. duties you will bs compen sated in ’an axount calculated at the rate of $19, 530 per annum. In addition, “you are herein authorized logislative salary atjustmenty, « within-orade promotions and, if appiicabla, a poat differ ential in substantial conformancs with rulea and re gulations apslicabls to Govsrnmeat apreciated emoloyees, Payments will be made as requested by you in writing in an apotoved man- ner. Taxes wlll be withheld therefrom aad submitted by this organization. 2. Allowances, You will ba entitled to: (a) Living quarters allow- .: ’ .&ntes in conformance with regulations of this OF ganization apslicable to a its aopointed personnel. In-tha event y you are furnished quarters by the Goverament you will not be entitled | to the ving quarte TS aowances herein indicated. . ; . p ee ; (b) Cost-of-living allowances ; ‘in conformance with applicable regulitions of this organization including, ‘but not limited to, a Host allowance, a transfer & allowance 2 aad 2 home ser- . Vice transior allowance. , os ae Loe k ; a : ne . 3. Travel, You will be advanced Or reimbursed funda for travel _ and’ Fanspor aon’ expenses for you. your dependent 3, your housshald ‘ellects and 4 your personal automopila to and from yout permanant Soest of. “a9sigsment, and for you'alone for authorized operational travel, Ia. dditiea, you will be entitled to storage of such household and personal * ele cts as are not ‘shipsed, in ‘onformance with agplicable Govérament a 7 oe Tegulat tions. WYou ray be ent tithed to per diem in Lieu of subsistence ia: the course of all travel perlorriad haroundes Tand, whea aut “horizad, for . you alone while on ternporazy” duty away from your Por™manent post of “assinnment. All travel, transportation aac per diam provided fo under, tal 3 paragragh must be proserly authorized, and exo2nges3 incurred here trder are subject te Plymment ant accouatiag in compliance with aaalicabdla | Goverarmezat vegulations. oe vary Oneraiional ox eases fochidiag, but not limites fo, enteriala. 3u purchase of information; 33 speclically avorovel by the Gaye. t. Such funda wilt De aubjscr to Paymentand Sccounting in como!i aace with ae palicasle Govecnment re: uutations. 4. Orerational { Expenses. You will ba advance dor reimbursed fends au : eat youe failure ta aecauat faz ar refiuad any monies adyan ov meatl estidde the Coy Tatmmaent ta Dhl ths sal Asrouat a. S4ly inseuledaves oe May CetTiloa lhecsol fea Say toate FOR URS Ure deren ats vale Cominact ba gues “Te ter ag ly sata . ay wee a gee
80000 z - Hee es habe weld oe ee in A a oar Annual leaves may oaly be taken at times and places approved in advance by 5 she momar - Will be effected eithes: by payroll ceduction or by direct remittance ae - @ y 6. Bensiits, (a) You willbe entitled to death and disiulity benefits equal to those authorized uadez the federal Employees! Compensation Act, asgamended. Ctais 12 by you, your heirs, os leral representatives uader this poragraok will be Processed by this oreinization in accordance with kta- Procecureas in such Manners as rot to impair sscurity. , , >, (>) You will be entiited to the continuance of pay and : . allowances Ina maprnez similar to that act forth in the Missing Persons Act (50 U.S.C.A., App. 1001-1015). ot . i . ; {e) You. will be entitled to sick, annual and homa leave. & ' (including travel exoenass incident thereto) equal foand subject to the same a rules and regulations applicable to Government appointed employees. appropriats Covernment representatives. Allacerusd but unused leave % credited to. your ‘former account as aa appointed employee of this organiza- ” ~ tion will be transferred ‘to the leave account established for you hereunder. ~ an ; 7 (4). Aga Government employee under contract converted from staff statua without a break in service, ft is required that you continue = to make contributions to the Civil Service Retirement Fund. Such contvi~ = . butions foresently aix and one/half per cent (6-1/2%)) will be deducted by - a, _ the Government from tha basic compzasation due you hereunder, i.e., > cc presently $19,880 per annum. oo so om, : oo - . fe) You are herein authorized to apply for enrollment me ina health insurance program for certain selected Contract Employees of - , this organization, svbject te all the terms and conditions of that Program, - If accepted, this organizatioa is presently authorized to bear a portion of |‘ ; the premium. cost, you will dear the remainder, Your financial contribution = oo ' pexiodic intervals té ba established by this organization. ne 2 48) (4) This organization is anthorized to pay the cost’ Z of necessary hogpitalization aad related travel expenses for illness oz fajury incurred -by a United States citizen full-time Contract Employee in the lise _ of duty while abroad, : Feo ime chatag Bp _.. (2) Thiso fon costs of hossitalizaiion and relited travel expenses fpr illness or injury incurred by tha devendents ofa United Stairs citizen full-time Contract _ ; . Employee Permanently assigned abroad, while they ara located abroad. | OP Bo Sy bea Ln er ae f + ; ft is understood aad agreed that the eligibility and extent of tha Participation by you and your dependents tn the above medical programs will be in con- formance wit the rules, regulations and policies of this orennization ia effece at the time an illness oc injury is incurred, thai all clima will be submitted only to this organization aad that adjudication of such claims by : . . this organization shall be final aad conclusive, _ 4. Offnet. Exmolument: acts fag benefits fa hind) recsived fram op a Cirough your cover netivities are lise orovacty of the U.S, Gavernment, Procedurally, ouch emoluments wll bes afiset againatamounts due you . ; uncer this agreement and are ackaowled set to beg payment hy ihe Gavern- ment hassuniter ond far Federal income. t¢ Pstoeses. Uf caver emolurm sats (e@xCaed thosg dig. yauuacter Uiby corirace, vou with thupoae of Sve access : ethows. unmount da conlargivney wits Govecastenial bestructe
SBR seater tam phe ae, Saag ote eee 3 me TP espe er rn ; violation ¢ of such’ Secrecy may Sabject you fo crimtinal Prosecution under tha! “in be jefing, training or otherwises axe 4 part of this contract aad ara incor. bee {c) Without Prior notice by tha Gever ment, in ¢ the event ofa Subiset to. the availability of appréariations, this agreement may be ex: tended! oy Upon notice from) the Coveramens, in the event of vole wary termination on YOur part or ter misation for cause by. sae Coveram ent Prior to the @xairation a of this.agre ment oz any renewal thereo » you will not be entivt ied to return |. Doe travel ex Senses t6 the Uaited States, Tea of this agzsesient wit ro: release you from the obligations of any secur ity oath you Tay be Trequized to take,’ | | | i | | } | j ook, ewe te ee oe Pong 3. Exeocucioa of Documents. If, in the berformance of Services under this contrac:, POU Asgunse eyo fcusiecy of Goveramane funds or take ticles of Fecord to oerozerty of any mature wi NS sOever And wh erever situat Proderty has in a ie Dean purchaged with monies of tis. JU. 5. Go you horeby ro Stee and ach: Nowledas Se. existence ofa te ces either express o OF Constructive, ana: you agtea fo exscut 2, wiiieh Vetarment, wat relationsiis, @ whatever docy- z FREAIS miay be Sequirgi by the ¢ Government  t0 evidence this Felationshis. ‘ - 9, Seczecy.. You will be required to keep for eve * Seer et this. Coatrace . and all information which you raay obtain by rcasoa hereof (urlegs Felsaszed'  * a writing by the Government frora auch obdligationys wits full knowledys thal Espionage Laws, dated 23 June 1988, as amended, aad other applicaols law: ; and reguintions.. . P 10, Instructions. ‘Instr ructions received by 4 you £ rom the Government porated herein, Provided that such ingiructions are nok *neonsiatent “ia the terms hereof, . OR ERP Sl mites Ll, Unauthorized Commitments. No promise: ‘Oo  Coimanion ents pers fining to rizhts, privileges or benefits other thaa thosee é expresaly Sti tioulater. “in writing in this agreément or any amendm ent. thereto shall pe 2 Dincing on 3 the: Government, 12. Term. This contract i is “effective asof 4Jul 1965 p and shail. continue there eafter for a .peviod of twa (2) years uniess 300near terminated: rs weet: 42) Upon: sixty (80) days! ace val notica bye ite sr Farty & & eto, or TIO hn gine {b) Upoa actual notice to. you in the. vent the: results of: an baitialty, required medical examination re dstermiaed by 8 this organiza ton . to be Ansatisiactory, Or > breach of this ‘contract by your violation of the Security orovistons - hereof or DF your-o oRerwise Tends ering yourself veavailable for’ : acceptable service. oe . a as “4 2, UN TED ST. ATES Covzanment Se Coat racting Gilicer Oo C: tf U ing | 9 VELNESS: - APPASYVED: °