. . SECKET 7 . i pC Bhen Felted tna anaes FITNESS REPORT (Part 1) PERFORMANCE beSTOUCTI OWS vet, FON THE AIVtTNISTRATIGZ. OFFICER) Consult current inetecct sens far comple FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is desigeed ta help you eanrees your evalustion of vour abordinete and tea transmit Saggapisntion polices tequires thet you inform the aubordi- thie evslustion te your eurerviaar and senior officials. nete where he «tents with you. Completion of the repare ced help you prevare for a atecagths end weaknesses. Tet ia abso Siganiention policy thet you ahow Part lof thes ceport tu the employee except under camlitiona specified iss Regubation 20-370. ft ie recseraeded that you reed the entire forn befoce completing eny estion., Ef this ia the initial seport oon the erntayoe, it muat be completed ond forearded to the Office of then 30 daye nfter the uate indicated gu item A, of Section "A" befow. GERBER AL discus¢ion with him of his Feesonnel ue Estee SECTION A. §. Nave {Laet; (Firat) SERVICE UF DI GHATION DI (¥iddies i7, vett oF grate 3. bea »L Dec, 1923 ;- a ae TETAL Post teen th Fuk 3. Area Opa. Officer 3B. OFFICE DivisiGu/ se burn O) ASSIGNMENT -DDP WE ?. oRage 8. pare wieyet Dut IN ar ee “. PERIOD Csi bly wr THES R{PoRT yInelusive dates) - 1 ‘19 March 1957 . 19 March 1956-19 March 1957 $0, TYPR OF REPORT Toeate as (READS Rew ew TE Oy PERE Oe seacian (Specify) (Check one) ¢ | annua _ te twriGere SECTION 8. eg So 50 rh. a fi #ON fue MATER: ted REPORT (oH) was CU] was wor ares & TO THR IMDEWEDUAL RATED. 6 HOP GHDEN. EFPLAIN MY NOT: . : . , 4. CHECR ¢X) ape . ; wae . eee ae BY. ~DATE—-—-§ -~ *“@ we O8m CF EMI OMe OF “IHD fee ieee whouar Vacwetae "Phage LE pe BL oe Seat 4 eT. . «oo MOP D OP. AaPORt srr es. yiouar. ? a sept to wit Ae core f . Sn naan . { 1, feoet noe ASpece typ: | Leuem ot CERT ts Cm et tek wa el D Tas 3 GEF ORT AF OL FC ER Fah GOW BINED UPEMIGHE OF a Aud PREVIOUA SUP LOSE SUPE, MANE DISCUDHeL we te Peta EMPLOYER HES 8 PRED feof mt amGad ented wi Grau, pe ee nt a Bee ce ce mere ae ern ea ee oe ata VESOR IO. 34 PINtON arty ago OHATmMEBSES 4% Nh. FHis DATE vans 25 Harch 19657 BORMATION. BHIC™ MILER LEAD TO & BETTER UNOEASTANDING OF Yeats BEPOAT, Teeee qe SuPtAYINOw, OF ANY GME Ths IME I have discusasd this report, and hie general eituation, in considerable detail with [| re Wigren. He felt he did not wish. to chaileaye the critical comments of the ratiag officers (I had two officers work together Ln that capality), but felt—that a rating £3 under spacific duty Mo.2 did not do him. justice, I think hesright on this score and would raise that rating to a 4, I would aay there has been an Improvement in Mr. igren’s performaace within the last year, and I have raised with the Division sreonnel Board the subject of a prométion for him to GS-12. The Board recommended oferment of his case. fora fewmonthae _ i] SUN TERUED UM BTShenOO Smtr Toceretify that as a reflected in thr above arction. en Ao PATS DALE S March 1957 OFFI Ci aL ode. OFFICEAL TETLE OF MEVIE GING OF FIT VAL Chief, WE SECTION C. . JOG PERFORMANCE EVALUATIGN - __ 1. RATIN GLNPG@ aL PeoroRMaANCE OF DUTIES ‘ GERECTIONS: hia duties during the satang period, y sibility. Factors ether thun productivity will be taken ints account Later in Section D Consider CALY the productivity ond effectiveriess eath ehich the individual being sated hae per farmed Compare him ONLY woth others doing similar eork at o similar bevel of respon. ‘1+ PGES ast PREF ORM DUTFES AOEGUI ATELY HE 14 retvevETEmY, OR TRAINING. HE OF Tim FAILS TO 2 BAAeL es BUEGIATE IN PERFORMANCE: ALTHOUGH WE 8S HAD SPECIFIC auitance 4 CARRY Oil WESPONSIGILETIES. . 3+ PERE See. MST SF WES GuTLes ACEP PABL Ys OFC OSI Ost LY BEVEALS SCM anga OF @EREHESS. TNSEaT a PERFORMS GUTIES eR A COMPETENT. EFFECTIVE waunte, RATING 3 + A FIWE PREEURMANCEL CARRIES OUT VANY OF IG HELP GMSIGELETIES ERCEPTIONALCY @FEL. NUMBER 6 + PERSGHMS HES OVTEES 1m SUCH AN OUTSTANDING wereld teAT ME 4S EOUALL ED fy FEW OMMER PLESONS enOany TO TRE SUPE RW ISOR. SEPL ALES PHEVIOUS LOT IOS SECRET Performance (as f . roe 45 {Part 1} FE F9GwS 45 AND 450 BEC seh OBSOLETE. 1 NOw 434 mw
SECRET ‘ CBhow Febfed Pat : MN OPERS OMMaRcE Ot SPEC EE AC OutlTs . . PERLTOTEHGS:. . f : Qa . ; @, Stote da the spaces below up toe age of the woee important SPFCEFIC Wuthes performed ducing NiO grgyros weriod. “Vinee the moet important fisst, Peonatogacliele mined of unimportant duties. . . Oy WLY effectiveness in portoemance af thie specetic BAL. bh, Rete perisemancve on each apecifie duty consaderia ebibity te aupeeuaee wall abeoys be ented as oe apecsfic set y fate PA fe ae @upereriers thoae ve. For superviaors, why supervise @ gevretary onmty >. « Lf : a ad. Compare in your mind, ehen possible, the rdividuel being rated with othere oe fegsasy Po Me ee at a J & simiter feved of responsibility, . ©, Two individuals with the same jyoh title wey de performing different duties. Fio an, rete then an tferent dfutire, : not . M4 fF. Re specifie.  Feamples of thy kind of dutees that meghe he rated are: 7a if iit , ORAL BRLERING NaN AVD USES 4874 XNOMLEDCE CONDUCTS NG terse rews GEVENG LECIURES PRYELOPS NEW PROGRAYS PREV ARES SUMGWARERS CON PLCTEING SAWINARS AVAL Y/ES INDUSTRIAL REPORTS TRAWILAYES GERUAN BRITING PFECNNICAL BKPORPS waWa S FELES- GENPIEPING SOURCES CONPUCTING ANTRANAL LEATSON OPERA HADIO REEFS BOOKS TYPING CCUROENATES 81TH OTHER OFFICES GRIVES TUCK . TARING DICTATION . WRITES REGULATIONS . “ MAPNPAENT ATR CONDEFEONING . SUPERVESING PRIPARES CORRESPONDENCE EVALUATES SIGVIFICANCE OF DAFA a For sume jeba, ahuities may be broken doen even futthes sbtosupervisog considers it aduisabde. e.g... combined key sini phone operation, in the case of a radio operntor, : a $ > UMCOMPE TINT tM th PERFORMANCE UF TetS DUTY & - PERPONWS THES Bute fa aM OUTSTANDING MANNE M 2+ GAdtiy ADE CUATE tM THE PLRPONMANCE GF TreESs POUND ite VERY FER PeOrvIDYALS MOLDING Sones. OTSCRIP TIVE Duty : Lag JOnS . 7 : RATING 2 + PERPORMS Tei UUTY ACCEPTaAaLy - . rs ‘Pos LECELS AMYONE § #2 EN THE PARFUMWANCE OF NUMBER 4. PERFORMS THiS GUTY IN A COMPETENT wannga taad Duty So PLAFORMS TIS OUTY: IN Sick A INE waNNER ‘ . OAT ME FS A DESTINTT ASSET OW 016 90 . eer. Somes mem wens paecneenaas casas ¢somimaae as  a a gan can a cece nape ne ec ne ete enna en ee nee eee “PECtBIEG Bure wo. ft : AAalinG|seicierce bute wo. & HATING Writes Hqe and field = [| xusnen . Analyses operationa = [uwnca Communications . $ and proposea action, , & . SPaCEFAg by tron o. a . ees — "BA Tint ' . i nas — a RAIIN a : Coordinates with other; suwnf ' . Briefe superlors on NUMRE A area deska and gtaffa. 1 3 | his astivities 4 wrereté puly mo, 3. . [RatinGporecirec uty wor Bn are Propares intelliganoe | xu | NUMBER reports (| 4 DIRECTIONS: Stroas atrengthse “pnd weeknessca, particularly those which affect developinent of present job. Most notablé among thie offloer's gtroag qualities are his intelligences, inquisi- tiveness, emotional otability and good judgement. He conprehends and analysos situa@ sions and problems readily and in tha latter seems very able.jat findtag logical Jeolutions. Ho exprenses hinself woll orally and in writing. He is noat in both personal and work habite.s Such weaknesses-as Mr. Wigren seams to havs lie in the areas of social relationship and motivation. He ie calm and introspective, not gregarious mor gasy to know. Though he ia always polite and even tempered he seens at the rooba, perhaps, unduly soonsltive. to oriticism. In his attitude. towards and the performance of fis job he seems to do what he likes well, but to let the lessazreeable thiags slides SECTION 0. ——---SULTABICITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATION ae PIRICTIONS: J Take inte account here tverything you know about the indfvidunt....praductivity, conduce in the job, Pertinent personal characteriaticn or hahite, special defects» or tafenes....and how he fies in with your team, Come pare him with others doiog similar work of about the same level. i+ Otrimetedw unsurraoue . owt SHOULD BL StPAwATED: . : 2+ OF DGUAFFUL SUITABELATY.. @0LO NOT “AWE ACCEPTED MIM GF | SAD KNOBN MAT 5 eaOR NOw Vo oa Wate ACCEPTAGLE R@PLOYER...OfLO@ AVERAGE Bul wilt Ka REASHESSES SUPFICICe re’ OUTSTANDING TO wane 4 RANT WIS SEPARATION 4- OF Yat Sami Sus TaAgiLity as MOST FeOPee 1 ANOw Ih PHE ORGAND ZATION RATING 3 s A GIMME TMPL OVER © RAS SOML OUTSTANDING STAENGT AS . NUMBER & + AY UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSUN th TERwWS OF TH REGUEREMENTS OF Tre ORGANI ZATIO‘’ ? ° EACELLED BY ONLY A FEW IN SuULTAMELIty $08 anRg dy Rae ORGAN TZ ATL OS ThOw bm THE ORGANI2Z4f ron? Coy ves (Ey se I ves, 'S THIS ENOIVEQUAL BETTER SutTEe soR aORS EUPR AGM Fitiv: rose &% duwe