oc cmegneneep sare vtte stomata met ee st [to4-t0763-10729) - AISIBTZO , . “Af. 74 24 April 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General SUBJECT : DCD Response to the Agency-Watergate File Review 1. A thorough review of DCD files disclosed the following attached items which may be pertinent to the review. Where no 4nformation was deveioped, the fact is so neted. . @ 4H. R. Haldeman - No record John Ehrlichman ~ No record -~ John Dean - No record tee Egil Krogh ~- No record David Young - No record John J. Caulfield - No record Juan Rigoberro Ruiz Villegas - No record Hank Greenspun - No record . tbs Be Howard Hunt: Attachment A concerns actions taken to locate suitable employment for Hunt - at the request of the Retirement Affairs Division. Argy $7.2, e. G. Gordon Liddy ~~ FIIS/ #6 25 Only record is James W. Mecord A \SISB 7S } a warning to DCD Eugenio Rolando Martinez Careaga ) field offices to A 18187/ —————Bernard L. Barker } report any calis Virgilio Gonzales— A (ZIB-y from these men. ) Frank Anthony Sturgis: attactvent B explains @ call by Sturgis to the DCD Miami Field Office. * A { GISSO e. Daniel Elisberg: Attachment C is the only : record in DGD on Kiisberg. ., . . * ed cee rete emmrmmmem eranernes cai ete etna , RETURN TO CIA Use Only Do et Reproduce e ne eens: avaearaes Foes me tom DN Sw # i . i erecte Rava os, #QROGSS.§ ; | BY fal a of : sa | al i Y ave * * @ yo tote Se . te ent ae *
SUBJECT: qn 4 { ‘ ‘ te the inquiry. “7 aban at ~. +e = Pa oT ~ rete geen eat” Oe BCD Response to the Agency-Watergate File Review £. Hunt's 1971 Request on Security Flaps: Not applicable. Be Other Requests by Hunt: None. he National Election 1972: Not applicable. di. Mexican Laundering: Attachment D reflects an action taken by DCD on behalf of OER; we do not deem it pertinent but forward it for consideration. j- ITT: | Ateachzent E contains what we consider te be all the data on DCD/IIT relationships relevant k. Robert 8. Mullen and Company: Attachment F ig two requests (1961 and 1969} for D&B reports on the company. Both probably were levied by Corporate vie Cover Branch. . . 1. ‘Howard Hughes: DCD has close and _ eontinuing relationships with the 24 A ané the since Both éoppanies have been completely cooperative. and have - provided a wealth of information over the years. & careful review of the files on these companies @iscloced no information which the reviewer . considered to fall within the scope of this inquiry. it should be noted, however, that in the case of VA about 100 in » DCD has cuntacted over 250 individuals start of our association and over the same period. The substance of the conta.cs ranged from FPI eollectien te sensitive operational proposals. In addition, there is some evitence in DCD files that both éompanies may have had ecntraccual relationships In the context of such a broad dm the compa te state éertainty that the surfacing of tchz substance of a given action would not cause Congrersional and/or media interest. ’ o2n G28 GY OP ROD bi il Se eA RE, ARN at er mmNE Fie ERT NE Abe TE RR eRe Im Hw ee ree with the . ‘ oe cen ~~OB\gange in CIA relationships, it fe Jiffisule i J 5/8R oon
eeg7 ey Sune SUBJECT: DCD Response to the Agency-Watergate File Review A I7A2 og m. Robert Vesco: Attachment G contains all the i. information in DCD files on Veses. - . Robert Maheu: No pertinent data. ' AAIN96 £ o. Charles Colson: Attachment Ho is all of . the information on Colso. in DCD files. ‘ CARROLL D. DELANEY Executive Officer Domestic Collection Division ’ - . Attachments: A/S ; * 2 oume * - _ cee antennae perenne ann snes eee ae ae enn = : * . ° ee ae ° ° . . ‘ ‘ — . ome 4G Ee ry . a i re ws ees cormeareten ‘ . . . ; a : ; _ GaGatel ve kt tee tee eae , eo t er