aed an 7 yep 3 ef 7 STEY OF on vy Th at heat. pa gah, yar aad i 5 nd {OSU Teer aes ine re » ‘ MRO RELEASE sy Ne SM LPI RET, UTE Ry Lh ot EADY MRAM SIOUTEE RAS Benny cae rene Ag fs n/40 Parte: . 422 sack He) Dian t pply siticoa ratifiaroe, fe rei -leetric ‘# UN 2695. Le “ot . ‘ ae May oe OD orlaeu ~aé Tuber AXX ~Gt OXS 195533 - | ag poced * “12 each Ke2 Feed Sefonstits Cine aot ined ae ‘t ab oe Ts my, 0 verte figy * 2h Small Springre for Orive Motor pec fet, ¢ oc” a red can l pec aan AMPEX PARTS e "36 each Re2O2 Resistors, 208 hes REVERE PATS , . . 56 Spare proasure pais TR-2601. when th PS agence 16 each ° Instunt Stop arms (nes ype. Ay . . 42 each Tope counter drive baits neta LTOL eo a “42 each Take up belts The ?BOg 0 a. 7 \y TY ST EQUIPMENT fleathkit Catiog . Fall and | inter RYh2Z-1983 ( a g hy SBoathkit Transistor testes nde te2e ~Capacitor Checker HAG Tt9-1} * “ ” . ‘Vaaunle-Aural Signal Tr cor Kae T-' “ . ' Sy Usetllosccpe rae TQ-1° ” , ” . 2Sgope Semodulutar prot kit Hat BUTS ” wooo “Low Capicity “anpe bret +4@ :--] “a fe ‘¢ \ aHarmunic [distortion eter REG (Tel o ” 7 N ‘Resistance aubsitition boa Kae 0 -—3 A 7 sCondo:;aert Sutbadtuction 10x F£E tol ag e ad 2 Alided Catalog # 220~-1563 Page 197 Z ny 4 each TseAl Tapa Splicera Cat A RUVACHAL05 © ef fe af ‘ Jeeay \2 each [S-55 Tapaspliicers Cut @ BRAT? + we . ‘\ . + A -6 each ap'iicing Tape “at BOR-205 - B-77% 474 Fach * ‘-Geneh Splicing Tape Cat RGR H195 ST - 56 Meeb fl fre : X ; Page 325 ; 7 y *BagiateU-Cheat 2MeTHB mfu types Bgunber +3 ” a ? Pago 394. d -4 on ” “Cable Splacing cord fe hor-2'5 47/2 1b, 4 z r ‘Nak nach oo Hel}? Cantrates -45-01Ler lo 4 wr fo. XK obTen 32 each Alidgnmenta Tapes--lare Parlay ys ag, 19 5088 Laer. e 4 fe he bn ort o él Lt fice | 4 each Jae26lea Flue ren€ey. Me hebce Lael! 3 “hk each P-16)-r Plug ay Pay, “Lefont J : 4 each PelOles Plug fae “4 ench Je202-P Pluga ‘6 each Ca20} Motor C pacitors, Lisctreiytic D,tap?, £206 V.
14-00000 | CLASSIFIED MESSAGE | ROUTING ! 1 $1 6} : bre 3 « OIRECTOR ROM g MEXICOCITY = _ INFO 4 «DOP, SOD.6, CA 2, CA/PEG, cA/PROP, CA/O 4, Cl, CI/oPS, CI/OA, FI, SEChn & T p5t924Z DIR INFO| |CITE NEXI. 7782 ° - REF EM3TEL 1563 DATED 14 JAN 54 [sdutin99236 I, NOTE CHARGE BOONSTRA REPORT OF VICENTE SANCHEZ GAVITO (MEXICAN ANSASSADOR TO OAS) CONVERSATION IN WHICH SANCHEZ GaAVITO SAID “VENEZUELAN PROSLEN IS CRITICAL FOR GOVERYMENT OF MEXICO. ALTHOUGH FONOFF HAS NOTT SEEN ANY OF THE EVIGENGe ON ORIGIN ARNS CACHE, SAID FONOFF HAS RECEIVED RELIABLE INFORMATION TO THE EFFECT EVIDENCE OF CASIKO ORIGIN IS CONVINCING." 2. BELIEVE "RELIABLE EVIDENCE” LIXELY THAT GIVEN TO LITENSOR - ¢ BY SAMUZL Ke CASTELOY IN DECEMBER BRIEFING. ( - a/ SECRET ; . . 4 M\) ? e ue \ : Lal Yu of iy le \ a ae a iV, Copy No. REPROPUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE [S PROHIBITED
14-00000 pee S$tcarcTt ~ . 7 CONTROL SND COIS CHcey ced whee . CEPARTMENT OF STATE Time Recto Caowe Seer 1700 LIMIT OISTRISUTICN.S/3 TELEGRAM C2 LIMIT OISTRIDUTION MEMORANSUM e a DEPTEL 1971 to Merico City . . Docunent LocnTiF cation: 4 ROUTES = - ATTENTION ALL RECIPIENTS: Tue Svare DEPARTMENT HAS FUaISHED TO Tad GiatcTor, CENTRAL tT? +7 INPECLIGENCE, ONE COPY OF THE ATTACNED DOCLMENT, REPRODUCTION 15 PROHIDITCO, THe Gaews cacn SECRETARIAT HAS ROUTED THIS BOOCUMENT AS SHOWN TO THOSE WO HAVE A NEED TO KNOW CHOTVIQUAL WHO SEES THIS MESSAGE SHOULO SIGN AND IKOICATE THE OATE OF RANDLING > THis ocs foc! €OVER SHCET MUST BE KEPT ATTACHES TO TME GCOCU4ENT UNTIL THE DOCUMENT 15 SLATROYEO. THE AD/et COVER SHEET MUST BE RETAINED GY TNE RECIPIENT FOR 30 OATS AFTCAWHICH If MAY BE OLATROYED Bdi WITHOUT ANY RECORD GF GOLSTRUCTION. , . : . AO/KE . GO? SIGNATURE OF PERSON SREING TELEGRAM _DATE co. b> RETAIN COVER SHEET FOR 30 DAYS 7 . SECRET GROUP 4 Cx ILuBEO FROM AUTOMAPIRE BOs] Exp Forn oy GRAQING AND CECLASSIFICATION cannes Sec, O/OCL, V7 Ara 63
14-00000 INDICASS: .o Ganater Olexasua 12 33 oe = ACTION, © ANE Preece oY SIO DE JALSTRO I. JR 28 573 Lone OT ADS SS jahoe eye tae ates AQMUALSSY te. Ae te ot ah henna can ee Sek te shan Nel com te Ae A MENICO CITY pB000 Liat DISTRELUTION s/s : _ GARACAS FASS WARD FYL. Ll. RD ALLEN atari: L071 “sprars 829 fee I? ig co fs'33 eae In connection Vercsuclan complaint to OAS, discussions in Standing Group of NSC have Ideatified two alternatives for cooperative systs m survelilance and interception of vessels and alrezaft engased in transporting arms for subversive - purposes to Lat in America (especially Caribbean area) direct] J ¥ or indireetly from Cuba. on need for OAS authorization for use of force in inte waters. Alternative 4 would require OAS author Difference betwean altarnitives centers rnational ization use of force in connection with visiteand-search in international waters against selected Cuban vessels and selected vesse s OAS countries, It would be a cooperative system of surveillance and interception Seated Bir Baas OS-322 involving visiteand-search in internzti basis, with force to be used if necessary. CI onal waters on a slective Vidteendesearch and, Lf rcoistance met, force would be applied by naval units of US or of cooperating ARA/CCA: Tics White House - Mr. OAS countries against selected vessels suspestéad cCunhcation approved Serohie Wane eng enh 7 simnins: gz /a2s 2/12/53 nL EE MIO ODORS Bundy ECRET of transporting arms frou Cubu,diceatly or indirectly. REPRODUCTION FROM THIS COPY IS PROHIBITED UNLESS “UNCLASSIFIED”
t x ' SECRET i] ~ “~ | Page. 2 of telegram to AZENTASSY MEXTOI, R10 A) CATACAS _ 3. Alcernative 5 would not require OAS authorizatic. ‘ ; \ wsa fovea fnusmuch as visiteand-scurch would take place only within territorial waters. It vould ba @ cooporativa system of surveillance and Iirterecption involving visit-and-search only within the territorial waters of an OAS country, with force to be applied, 1£ necessary, by that country’s forces or by forces of ahother OAS country acting under @ bilateral agreement. Coatrol of suspect vessels destined for non-OAS country or territory (e. g. British Guiana) would deperd on cooperation that county. 4. In both alternatives interception or seizure of suspect aircraft would be carried out only in terrLtory of O\S country of deatination by forces of that country or of another OAS country acting uader a bilateral agreement. 5. Comparison of alternatives: (a) Alternative A would be much harder to sell to OAS countries than Alternative B because authorizetion for use eof force xquired, (b) Alternative A would be somewhat more ec both in fact and as deterrent than Alternative B, although both can be circumvented. . (c) Alternative A would constitute haragsszzut of Castro whereas Alternative B is purely defensive. (d) Alternative A would incur substantially greater risks of escalation than Altecnacive 8B. SECRET vee!