My Co Date: 05/31/95 Page: 26 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY RECORD NUMBER RECORDS SERIES DS AGENCY FILE NUMBER ORIGINATOR FROM TO TITLE ROI ee 08 of 5 AGENCY INFORMATION DOS 1191000310122 39-141-122 DOCUMENT INFORMATION DOS ' The Department of State pestpones the release of parts © F this document under the provisions of the JFK Assassination Records Coliection Act of 1992 (PL 102-526) Reviewedon [2 Wee 7% ue) 07/27/64 DATE PAGES SUBJECTS OSWALD, LEE HARVEY DOCUMENT TYPE CLASSIFICATION RESTRICTIONS CURRENT STATUS | DATE OF LAST REVIEW OPENING CRITERIA oe oe 00 00 ce se 34 Postponed Under _ 6 (3) PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT <. 3, X 05/31/94 CONSULAR AFFAIRS, FBI, CIA REVIEW — COMPLETED COMMENTS CONSULAR AFFAIRS INTEREST =§  wamesS @ycrarcl (4° 16-8 FBI ok to release CIA ok to release CA release in part HW 50529 Bocld: 32231722 [R] - ITEM RESTRICTED Page 1
aN - FORM DS-638 4-26-56 DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF SECURITY OSWALD, Leo Harvey a 14.26.00 FIELD OFFICE DATE REPORTED DATES INVESTIGATED REPORTING AGENT _ - . June 24 to Washington July ZI, 1964 July 23, 1964 Louis C, Kachulis SYNOPSIS A procedural atudy of the. look-out card system of the Passport Office was conducted with specific reference being made to the procedures followed in the Lee Harvey OSWALD case, including a security survey of the Clearance Section, The details: are. set forth below, ~ CLOSED - REFERENCE? Orel anstructions 2f from S¥/Headquarters dated June 4, 1964 : Mr; Berry Memorandum from Mr, G. Marvin Gentile to Mr. Henri G. Grignon dated June 2, 1964 Memorandum from Mr, A. Schwartz to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile dated May 20, 1964 “ DETAILS Pursuant to the authority in the referenced oral instructions and memo- randa, and a conference held on June 23, 1964, attended by Mr. Charles Mace, Mr, Richard Frank, Mrs, Frances Knight, Mr. Edward Hickey, Mr. Robert D. Johnson, Mr, G. Marvin Gentile and the writer, a procedural study of the | lock-out eard system of the Passport Office was conducted, APPROVED ~ | DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE Sigs ae "ss DATE RECEIVED 77 (Special Agent in Charge) COPiES REFERRED 3 ~ Headquarters 1 - WFO file (64-1475) REVIEWED BY AGENT SUPERVISOR __ (Date) (Initials) Excluded from automatic CONFIDENTIAL ; downgrading and declassification THIS REPORT 1S THE PROPERTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND {TS CONTENTS MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS. GPO 691584 HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 2?
oe on CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey. The look-out card process can be divided into two categories, (a) one which can be referred to as the judicial aspect and (b) the ministerial as- - pect. The first category concerns itself with the basis or criteria used in determining whether or not a card shall be requested. The second cate- gory concerns itself with the mechanical steps involved in preparing a lock-out card from the time a decision to request a card is made until the filing of the card, Since the purpose of this study is primarily concerned with the procedures in handling the look-out cards, emphasis will be placed on the ministerial aspect of the leok-out card process with reference to the judicial aspect primarily for reasons of background, Furthermore, any . recomendations at the conclusion of this repert, which can be said to fall within the judicial realm of the process, are offered not as criteria for refusing a passport, but only as a means of avoiding the routine issuance of a-passport to an individual with a questionable background. Moreover, the study was confined to inquiries to determine how the look-out cards are handled in a typical "OSWALD" case and specifically the procedures followed in the Lee Harvey OSWALD case itself, This study is broken down into the following categories: (1) the general overall procedures, (2) the Lee Harvey OSWALD case; (3) security survey of the Clearance Section, (4) recommendations, and (5) summary of SY/Files having derogatory infor- mation relating to personnel assigned to the Clearance Section. ~ Qa i 2 - a CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DoclId: 3227681722 Page 3
THE GENERAL OVERALL PROCEDURES \S HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 4
HW 50529 (1) CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey XN GENERAL OVERALL PROCEDURES: Am Generally the request for the preparation of a look-out card comes from the Passport Office's (a) Domestic Operations Division, (b) Foreign Operations Division, (c) Legal Division, and (d) the Department's Office of Finance. (a) Domestic Opoerati rision: Basically the Domestic _ Operations Division DO TP all applications for passports within the United States. The application is generally received in a passport agency, where it is reviewed by an adjudicator to determine, among other things, whether or not it has been ‘proper ly executed, and whether the applicant is seeking te travel in restricted areas, Assuming the application does not indicate restricted travel and that it is properly executed, the appli- cant's name and date of birth are teletyped to Washington, D. C., where it is cheeked through the Clearance Section to determine whether or not a look-out card exists. If one does not exist _ the passport is issued routinely, if a card dees exist the is- suance of the passport is held in abeyance and the applicant's - passport file is reviewed prior to the issuance of the passport. In cases where the application indicates a prior passpert has . been issued and that it is potentially valid the agency requests the applicant to present it for examination. If the passport has expired the applicant is not requested to present it. When an application indicates a desire to travel in countries for which _ there are travel restrictions and the applicant persists in his desire, a letter of explanation is requested and is forwarded to _the Department tegether with the application for determination, ‘Further, applications which raise a question of citizenship, loss of eitigsénship, or a possibility of fraud are forwarded to the Department fer decision. When such a question of citizenship _ arises it is referred to a Senior Adjudicator who makes a deter- mination. If it is decided there is prima facie evidence indi- _ . eating a lack of citizenship or a loss of citizenship, a look~ ‘out card is requested by preparing a refusal sheet. The pur- pose of the look-out card is primarily to serve as a "flag" or an "alert" to the Passport Office, In the event a passport is subsequently applied for it will not be issued routinely, but a review of the applicant's file by a Senior Adjudicator will then be made to determine whether or not a passport may be duly Assued, - ~3- CONFIDENTIAL DoclId: 322761722 Page 5
: aes CONFIDENTI AL OSWALD, Lee Harvey ‘(b) Foreign Operations Division: The Foreign Operations Division . (FO) receives for action, matters arising overseas relating to pass- port and nationality matters. However, it should be noted that only _- "problem" cases are referred to FO for decision (8 FAM 245.6 speci- .. fies what cases "must" be referred to the Department "for decision") ; approximately 93 to 95% of all cases arising overseas are handled by the overseas post concerned. In cases referred to the Department, if the adjudicator determines that there has been a loss of citizen- _ ship or a failure to acquire citizenship a refusal sheet is prepared requesting a look-out card, Also, a card may be requested in any @ase where the adjudicator desires one to act as an "alert" or "flag". That is, although there is no legal basis under existing regulations and statutes for refusing or limiting a passport, it is felt, none- | theless, in the adjudicator's judgment, that a passport should not be subsequently issued routinely. This "flag" or "alert" insures, at least, a review of the individual's passport file prior to the issu- . vance of a passport, Decisions for an "alert" or "flag" are based on _ the adjudicator's experience and no definite criteria are established. (c) Legal Division: The Legal Division of the Passport Office is composed of the Legal Advisory Branch (PT/LAD) and the Security Branch (PT/LS). Generally PI/LAD is concerned with look-out cards _in cases which involve passport frauds, imposters, child custo eases and requests from other agencies for look-out cards, PI/LS is primarily concerned with Communist Party members, Commmist sym- . pathisers, persons who have violated travel limitations, ete. This -. Branch receives reports from other agencies, which are disseminated. _ by INR. The majority of the reports come from the FBI with a small portion from the CIA, (INR records indicate that some 350 or more reports are forwarded to the Passport Office each month).. PT/LS reviews the reports and if they indicate the individual is a Com- munist Party member or a member of a Front Organization which im- plies strongly the individual is a member of the Communist Party, a look-out card is requested through the preparation of a refusal (a) Office of Finance: Within the Department the Office of Finance (OF) also requests look-out cards when en individual has been granted a repatriation loan. The procedure requires that _ when an individual executes an application for a repatriation loan a CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DoclId: 3227681722 Page 6
HW 50529 CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey the request is forwarded to the Special Consular Services (SCS) of . the Department for determination. If the loan is approved, SCS so _ advises the overseas post and the loan is granted. (It is not cus~ : .<temary for SCS to advise the Passport Office of their reasons for ‘granting the repatriation loan). When the loan is granted, the. Consular Officer forwards a copy of the invoice to OF, on some oc- casions the invoice would indicate the individual's date and place of birth and name, and on others only the name. These invoices would then be forwarded to the Clearance Section of the Passport _ Office and acted as a uest for a look-out card. However, if the loan did not exceed $50 and did not contain a date and place — ef birth a card vould not be prepared and it would be returned to OF. As a result, therefore, when an invoice did not indicate a date and place of birth OF discontinued sending them to the Clear- _.ance Section. When an invoice did not contain the required infor- .. Mation the Clearance Section did prepare a look-out card and insert _ it into the look-out file. Under current procedures the loan application is sent with _ the invoice to OF by the overseas post and the date, place of birth and the amount of the loan are readily available to OF, The Clearance Section maintains the requirement of a date and . place of birth in order to insure positive identification when . .’@ search is made and avoid possible embarrassment to the Depart- "ment by erroneous identification, Further, under current pro- — “cedures OF prepares its own IEM look-out card and forwards it to ‘the Clearance Section for insertion in the look-out file. -B ~ The Clearance Section of the Passport Office is that area where the look-out file is maintained, When one of the areas under (A) above requests a look-out card through the preparation of a refusal sheet, under current pro- cedures, the Following steps are taken: (a), The Senior Adjudicator or the Adjudicator preparing the _ refusal sheet signs the sheet authorizing the request; (bv) a clerk within the Adjudicator's area prepares the look- . out card in duplicate, signs the refusal sheet and forwards the | sheet and the duplicate cards to the Clearance Section; (c) the clerk within the Clearance Section receiving the (> file with the refusal sheet and look-out cards performs the ve -foMowings — -5- CONFIDENTIAL DoclId: 3227681722 Page 7
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (1) indexes the refusal sheet; (2) places one look-out card in the look-out file as a temporary card and the other is stored for fu- ture forwarding to prepare an IBM card, (When the IEM card is received it replaces the tempor- ary card and becomes the permanent card). (3) When these steps have been performed the indivi- dual performing them signs the refusal sheet. (4) The passport file is then forwarded to the Pass- port Office files for storage or to a requesting individual, a _ The indexing of the refusal sheet consists of the following: The indi- vidual's name is typed along the right-hand margin of the refusal sheet by a clerk designated to do se and,under the old system, the name preceded by the number 130. Also, prior to the adoption of the current refusal sheet where the signature of the clerk receiving the file and refusal sheet within the Clearance Section is required, the indexing was the only evidence the re- fusal sheet was received and a look-out card prepared by the Clearance Sec- tion, Moreover, the current refusal sheet was not in effect at the time of the OSWALD lcok~out cards. The number 130 was used as part of the State Department's filing system. Under that system numbers 130 te 149 were assigned to the Passport files and 130 denoted the files which vere filed by an individual's name and not by subject matter; however, approximately two years ago the Department's files were decentralized and the numbers were dropped, - - Prior to this current procedure the system generally required the re- | questing officer to execute a refusal sheet and forward it, with the file, to the Clearance Section where a clerk indexed the refusal sheet and pre- pared a look-out card, Under both systems if there was no request to re- turn the file to a particular individual it would be forwarded to the Pass- port files for filing, Under the present precedures there is a record kept of the names of all the persons taking action on the refusal sheet with regard to the look-out card, Under both systems it is assumed that all proper action will be taken during the ordinary course of business. However, under neither system, pre- sent or prior, is there any one particular individual vested with the respon- sibility of checking to determine that all the ministerial steps required in. processing of a look-out card have been complied with, - ~6< CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DoclId: 3227681722 Page 6
CONPIDENTIAL | OSWALD, Lee Harvey — . G — The removal of the lock-out cards is requested by those individuals having authority to do so ~ generally an Adjudicator in FO or a Senior Adju- dicator in DO. In cases where a look-out card is requested for loss of citi- zenship, lack of citizenship, or any case where there ia no time limit placed on ‘the look-out card the request is made when evidence is received warranting a reversal of the Adjudicator's prior decision. In such eases the Adjudicator marks the refusal sheet “disregard”, indicates the reason for removal, and signs. his name. The file and refusal sheet are forwarded to the Clearance | Section where the card is removed by the Chief of the Clearance Section or someone designated by him. Prior to the adoption of this procedure there was no formal record kept of the reason for removal of the look-out card on the refusal sheet and the requesting officer did not sign his name on the sheet, The refusal sheet was merely marked "disregard" and forwarded te the Clearance Section for removal of the lock-out card, "With regard to the removal of look-out cards requested by outside agencies this is accomplished when the requesting agency asks that it be removed. In cases where the card has a set expiration date the Clearance Section removes it automatically at the end of the period or shortly thereafter. _ “ Look~out cards requested by OF are removed by the Clearance Section when it is notified that the loan has been paid in full. OF sends a monthly list of persons who have paid in full to the Clearance Section for removal of the look-out cards. - Procedures in the Clearance Section dictate that the actual remeval of the: card shall be accomplished by the Chief of the Section himself or his designee. HW 50529 DoclId: 3227681722 Page 9
HW 50529 DoclId: 32261722 THE LEE HARVEY OSWALD CASE Page 10
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (2) LEE HARVEY OSWALD CASE: The OSWALD passport file was reviewed by the writer and it is noted that the case was handled by the Foreign Operations Division. Also, that a refusal sheet was prepared; was apparently indexed, although not accord- ing to standard procedures for indexing; and the refusal sheet was not marked "disregard" ~ authority to remove the look-out card, OSWALD applied for and received a passport on or about June 25, 1963 at the Passport Agency in New Orleans. The New Orleans Passport Agency sent a TWX to Washington which, among other names, listed OSWALD's name, but no information indicating a prior passport was issued to him. OSWALD's 1963 application indicated de- sired travel to Russia and Cuba, Mr, Henry KUPIEK, Chief, PT/FEA, was interviewed and advised that cases assigned to his Branch first came to his desk, as Chief of the Branch, and he assigned them to the Adjudicators according to their experience and abil- ity. KUPIEK related he assigned the OSWALD case to Bernice WATERMAN (since retired) who was at the time his Assistant and a most experienced Adjudicator, Mrs, WATERMAN was interviewed and advised that she prepared a refusal sheet requesting a look-out card for OSWALD in March of 1960, She continued, saying that the purpose of a look-out card in the OSWALD case was not to re- fuse him a passport in the future since he had not expatriated himself, but was intended only as an "alert" or a "flag", Mrs, WATERMAN further stated that she was only attempting to avoid the issuance of a passport routinely in the event OSWALD should apply in the future. She added that she did not mark the refusal sheet "disregard" when it was decided OSWALD had not in fact expatriated himself because, as already indicated, she considered the card a "flag", She stated it was her intention to leave the card in the file indefinitely so that OSWALD's file would be reviewed by an Adjudicator prior to the issuance of a passport to him in the future. She related that once she had executed a refusal sheet it would be forwarded to the Clearance Sec- tion where a look-out card would be prepared and filed. She added, she did not, nor was there any prescribed procedure, follow up her request in any way to insure the card was prepared and filed, but assumed that all persons concerned would perform their respective duties properly and a card prepared and filed in the due course of business. As indicated above, it appears from a review of the OSWALD refusal sheet that at least an attempt was made to index the sheet which, if it had been done, would have been followed by the preparation and filing of a look-out -g- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page il
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey card, It has been previously indicated that the usual procedure for index- ing is one where the individual's name is typed along the right-hand margin of the sheet preceded by the number 130. In the case of OSWALD, his name, rather than typed, had been clearly printed by hand along the right-hand margin and was not preceded by the number 130. Arthur M, COSTLEY, Evelyn V,. HALL, Alexander W, MAXWELL, Nanne BERREY, Dorothy CARTER, and Mary RICHARDS (who is no longer with the Department) all of whom, at one time or another about March 1960 prepared look-out cards, were interviewed and shown a. copy of the OSWALD look-out sheet. All readily denied it was their hand printing except Dorothy CARTER, When shown the sheet CARTER immediate- ly stated that the printing was hers, and when asked if she were positive, _she stated only that it looked very mech like her hand printing, (CARTER's statements were made in the presence of Henry KUPIEK). CARTER continued saying that assuming the handwriting was hers it could safely be concluded a lock-out card was prepared and filed. However, CARTER had no personal recollection of preparing or filing a look-out card in the OSWALD case ner had she any recollection of removing the OSWALD card from the file, With - regard to the fact that the number 130 did not precede OSWALD's name CARTER could offer no explanation other than the possibility the refusal sheet may have been indexed when the number 130 was dropped by the Passport Office. In interviewing the various Passport Office personnel none could offer any explanation as to what may have happened to the look-out card had one been prepared. The majority of the persons interviewed were of the opinion that a card was never prepared because, among other reasons, the refusal sheet was not indexed. Mrs. WATERMAN, among others, offered the possible explanation that the refusal sheet was buried under subsequent correspond- ence and, as a result, missed when the file reached the Passport files. The general accepted procedure for removing a look-out card was des- cribed as one where the Adjudicator marks the refusal sheet "disregard" and forwards it to the Clearance Section for action. However, in interviewing Alexander W, MAXWELL, Chief, Clearance Section, and Evelyn V. HALL, now. with RAF, it was determined that in many cases the Adjudicator only sent a "buck slip" to the Clearance Section requesting the removal of the card and the refusal sheet in those cases apparently was not marked "disregard", It appears from talking to MAXWELL and HALL that this was done more often than not, ~9- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 12
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey OSWALD was granted a repatriation loan on June 1, 1962, The repatriation loan authorized by Special Consular Services (SCS) was granted on the authority of 7 FAM 423.1-2 which states "b, The United States national is in or is the cause of a situation which is damaging to the prestige of the United States Government or which constitutes a compelling reason for extending assistance to effect his return." There does not appear to be anything in OSWALD's passport file to indicate that the Passport Office was notified of SCS's reasons for its decision that OSWALD came within the cited regulation, ‘Since the loan was granted on June 1, 1962, a look-out card should have been pre~ pared in June of 1962, Leola B, BURKHEAD, ACD/RR was interviewed and advised that at the time of the OSWALD loan the procedure was to forward a copy of the loan invoice to the Clearance Section where a look-out card was prepared, She advised that since Passport would not prepare a card unless the name was accompanied by a date and place of birth her office discontinued sending the invoices to Passport, BURKHEAD stated she definitely recalled forwarding the OSWALD invoice to the Passport Office; that it was returned because it lacked a date and place of birth; and that she as a result, threw it away, BURKHEAD stated that she did not attempt to obtain OSWALD's date and place of birth and ac- cording to MAXWELL of the Clearance Section, it was not the procedure for the Clearance Section to attempt to obtain the information. With regard to BURKHEAD's certainty that she did in fact forward the OSWALD invoice to Pass~ port it should be noted that she was equally certain of the manner in which OSWALD repaid his loan, She related that OSWALD made one payment of $100 and paid the balance in person at the Department. The record clearly shows OSWALD repaid his loan in seven installments by mail. In interviewing various persons in the Domestic Operations Division, including Virginia D, CARROLL, Vivian A, FERRIN, Margaret L. TATUM, and Zella M, BRAZEAL, it appears that when an application for passport contains something unusual it is referred to the Department by the Passport Agency so that a prior file, if one exists, may be reviewed and a decision rendered. All the individuals named above indicated that a potentially valid passport (such as OSWALD's) which had been stamped for limited travel is the type of case where the prior passport file would have been requested. On June 25, 1963, or thereabouts, OSWALD applied at the New Orleans Pass- port Agency for a passport and indicated Russia and Cuba, among other places, -10- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 13
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey as countries he wished to visit. The application also indicated that he had a prior passport (#1733242) and the application was marked "C & R" (cancelled and returned). The "C & R" indicates that the Agency saw the passport, can- celled it and returned it to OSWALD, However, the TWX sent to the Department does not indicate the passport was stamped for limited travel nor was any re- quest made for the passport file. (Correspondence in the passport file of Lee Harvey OSWALD indicates Embassy Moscow was instructed by the Department te restrict OSWALD's passport to use for direct return to the United States.) ~-ll-= CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 14
SECURITY SURVEY OF THE CLEARANCE SECTION HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 15
f 4 _ CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (3) SECURITY SURVEY OF THE CLEARANCE SECTION: The Clearance Section which maintains the Look-out File is housed in a rectangular room with entrances from the 1800 corridor at 1811 and 1813.. Also, there are two doors within the room, one at the East wall connecting it with room 1815 occupied by the Domestic Operations Division and another at the West wall connecting it with room 1807 occupied by Foreign Operations Division. The reom is equipped with a Perimiter Control Security System. All doors are equipped with magnetic contacts; all, except the main door (1811) are equipped with security dead bolts; and the main door is fitted with an S&G model 50 pinch proof combination lock with dust cover. The room also has two windows on its North wall near the West corner which are fitted with tapes and contacts. The Security System is deactivated Monday through Friday between 7:00 am and 7:30 am and is activated between 5:30 pm and 6:00 pm; on Saturdays it is deactivated between 8:30 am and 9:00 am and activated between 1:00 pm and 1:30 pm. During all other times the security system is on and a specified procedure mst be followed to gain entrance into the room - only those persons authorized to enter will be allowed to do so by the GSA guards, If any of the four doors is opened other than as indicated above there occurs a simultaneous annunciation, one at the Guard Office in the Department and the other at the A.D.T,. Central Station, The West part of the room is occupied by the TWX Section and is sep~ arated by a glass partition with an opening in the center permitting free access between the TWX Section and the Clearance Section. A small area on the Clearance Section side of the partition and near the South wall is occupied by the Recording Section of the Domestic Operations Division ‘which is composed of about three or four workers depending on their work we ee HW 50529 load. For the convenience of DO the security dead bolt on the East door is left open during working hours to permit access between the Recording Section of DO and the Adjudicator Section of DO. The other security dead bolts are kept locked at ali times. With regard to the actual searching of the look-out files only those persons assigned to the Section and those authorized by General Management Instruction 1714.1 are permitted to search names through the files. The DO employees sharing space in room 1811 are not permitted to search the files; however, the TWX employees are allowed to search when an urgent TWX is received, ~12- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 16
HW 50529 DoclId: 32261722 gE a a aE TSF TSF SES SS BS RECOMMENDATIONS Page i7
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (4) RECOMMENDATIONS: A - It has been noted during this survey that no one particular indivi- dual is vested with the responsibility of checking to seé that all steps necessary in the request, preparation, and insertion in the file of leok-out cards have been complied with prior to placing the case file in the files for storage, In this regard the following are recommended: (a) that the refusal sheet be placed on the inside left cover of the file where one exists, and in all other cases at the top of all the correspondence both prior and subsequent; (b) that the outside cover of the file be marked in such a manner as to alert the file room personnel and all others coming in contact with it, that the file contains a refusal sheets; (c) thet responsible clerks be assigned to handle the filing of these files, and they should be vested with the responsibility of checking to see that all the signatures required by the refusal sheet have been entered on it; (ad) if a refusal sheet does not bear all the necessary signatures and notations the file should be returned to the person or area requesting the look-out card and it should then be their responsibility to insure the necessary signa~ tures and notations are entered on the refusal sheet. B - It is recommended that the refusal sheet be amended to include the name of the person who physically removes the leok~out card from the look- out file, and the date of such removal. , GC - In making the recommendations immediately following it is realized that a passport cannot be refused an individual for the sole reagon that he falls within one of the categories outlined. However, they are offered, as indicated earlier in this report, with the intent of avoiding in the future the routine issuance of a passport to a person coming within one of the spe~ ecified categories without at least a review of the person's passport file, . and in some cases a check of the Office of Security indices. In short, they are suggested with the aim of preventing the routine issuance of passport to a person with an "OSWALD" background. -13- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 138
u HW 50529 to be adequate, CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (a) It is recommended that in all eases where the person seeking a passport indicates a desire to travel behind the Iron Curtain and evidence of a prior passport exists, the individual's passport file be reviewed and his name checked through indices of the Office of Security for possible CIA or FBI information prier to the issuance of a passport. — (b) It is recommended that in all cases where a passport stamped for limited travel is presented, the passport file should be requested and reviewed prior to the issuance of a _ passport. (c) It is recommended that in all cases where an indivi- dual has attempted to expatriate himself a look-out card should be requested, prepared and filed. Also, if the individual should apply in the future for a passport the passport file should be reviewed and his name checked through the indices of the Office of Security for the reason as indicated under (a) above. (ad) It is recommended that in all cases where a repatria- tion loan is granted because the applicant for the loan comes within the purview of 7 FAM 423.1-2 (the person is involved in a situation damaging to U. S. prestige), the Passport Office be advised ef the facts surrounding SCS's decision. (e) It is recommended that in all cases where the Passport Office is apprised as recommended in the preceding paragraph (d) & look-out card be requested, prepared and filed in the name of the individual. (f) If the pertinent regulations do not already so state, it is recommended they be amended making it mandatory for the overseas post granting the loan to forward a copy of the loan application together with the invoice to the Office of Finance, D ~ The Security of the Clearance Section as described above is believed However, it is felt that access into the Clearance Section during working hours should be more closely controlled. following are recommended: -l4- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 19 In this regard the
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (a) The Recording Section of the Domestic Operations Divi- sion be relocated te an area outside the Clearance Section; . (b) A buzzer-type swinging door be placed in the opening of the glass partition separating the TWX Section and the Clear- ance Section; (c) All security dead bolts be kept locked at all times; (a) A counter be installed inside the entrance to the Clearance Section over which business with persons not assigned to the Clearance Section may be transacted; (e) All persons permanently assigned to the Clearance Sec- tion be required to have their Identification Cards visibly dis- played on their persons during all working hours. ~15- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 20
REVIEW OF SY/FILES OF PERSONS ASSIGNED TO THE CLEARANCE SECTION HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page ?1
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey (5) SUMMARY OF SY/FILES: The Security files of personnel assigned temporarily or permanently to 7 the Clearance Section were reviewed by Special Agent Robert J, FUREY and the writer. However, the Security files reviewed were limited to files of personnel assigned to the Section from January 1960 through August of 1961, and March 1962 through August of 1963, the periods when a look-out card, if one had been prepared, would have been on file for OSWALD, The first period covers the span when OSWALD attempted to expatriate himself wmtil the Department's decision that he had not.in fact expatriated himself, and the second period extends from the granting of the repatriation loan until the final payment and slightly beyond. Approximately 140 files were reviewed (the list of names was supplied by the Passport Office) and fol- lowing is a summary of the. files containing derogatory information of a more serious nature: ° (i iz He was accused of making statenents, while at ees Bonn, that he was "a confirmed Commnist” and that he "would probably go to Moscow and never return", /EKORSAK] stated the statements were made in jest. While in Cermany he was intimate with an East German girl. He ad- mitted to excessive drinking, Also, he reportedly attempted to rape a "CAS" employee, but denied it when questioned, PER/MED advised they believed\KORSAK| under EO 10450. to be a security risk May tant EE.) It was stated that a picture of Nikita S. KHRUSHCHEV was observed hanging on the wall of a room YS ith an extensive knowledge of Marxist Doctrine; has expressed himself as being anti-American and praises the Soviet Union; is an admirer of Paul ROBESON; has dis- tributed pro-Soviet pamphlets, printed by the Council on African Affairs which is cited by the Attorney General as subversive and commmist; attempted to organize a Canal Zone Branch of the International Progressive Negro Youth Congress during 1950. -16- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 22
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey EMALONE?) He was accused of engaging in extra-marital relations with Department employees. While in the U. S. Army he wrote to Paul ROBESON soliciting his aid in mar g a Ger- man national - he stated the letter was not answered. (MATONES attempted to enlist the aid of Senator JAVITS and Representa- tive BLAKELY on his behalf implying he was victim of discrin- ination. JAVITS and BLAKELY withdrew their support when ap- prised of the facts in the case. , ing the sone [eiceer ieee o the Chinese Nationals, and served as Chairman of the 5th Congressional District of the Progres- sive Party in Philadelphia. name appeared on the wailing. list of the Progressive Party of the District of Columbia in 1955. et j vA former employer questioned his honesty. Eton = LEB ad a serious record of bad credit and was of- eee ity to resign in lieu of charges. He admitted being party to a, pteain-money under false pretences. Also, he listed (Dammnor NS#as a reference (see name below). he as had bad credit from the date h_the Department in 1956 up to and including this year. {-FLEMONS| liste Milton LEB/above as a reference, erie: Regina JOHNSON (Valerio: ReginasMGY She gave birth o a child out. of wed ock fathered by a Southern Rhodesian na- tional, Charles MOYO, who has returned to Africa, Also, some people * questioned her emotional stability. It appears she was friendly with aQiadelyn FM who planned to marry an Ethio- pian national who at one ee tine was reportedly attached to the Ethiopian Embassy. -17- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 23
HW 50529 CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Bi Albert: 23/ While enrolled in the R.0.T.C. program he re- fused to ae a loyalty oath. He has, however, denied menbership in any subversive organizations. ebard. Br TH:] A doctor adyised_the Office of Security that there nore eaieted the possibility (KURTICH fay be dangerous. The doctor officially stated sybjeet has a "character disorder" and unofficially he indicated{KURTI isa. sychopath and des- cribed him as "thoroughly rotten". ( KURT CH admitted tg homo- sexual activity and being friendly with(Kenneth, B;-GARY/ listed below. Resigned in lieu of charges. ‘Bug Jefferson: PAL signed a Comm- nist Party election petition in 1940. This” was admitted by the father but he denied knowing what it was. "Ju BACHLY ¢ PER/MED advi sed BLACHL: should be given a Sore evaluation, however, he transferred to AID prior to the evaluation, Al though no derogatory information as such appears, the e reflects that he was discharged from the military service in 1943, the height of World War II, be- cause he did not possess the required attributes to become anc officer. — ugias® Bruce : No derogatory information concernin “UTHUS? However, his father was investigated by the FBI for possible fraud against the Government while performing his duties with the War Assets Administration; for representing himself as a procurer of Government contracts; and for failure to register under the Registration Act as a Foreign Agent. In each case there was no prosecution by the Department of Justice. ~18- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 24
le SA CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Below are listed the names of all the people whose security files were reviewed with the date and type of Security Clearance received: George William ALLEN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/3/55 - transferred to CSC 12/30/61 Janice ALESTOCK, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/17/63 - resigned 11/18/63 Horace ANDREWS, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/26/61 = com- pleted assignment released 5/12/61 Robert BANKS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/30/62 - resigned 9/18/63 James G, BARNUM, granted 180~day clearance on 3/9/60 - resigned 5/25/60 Gregg F. BENJAMIN, granted 180-day clearance on 12/13/60 - resigned 4/12/61 Nanne BERREY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/8/54 Carmen BEVACQUA, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/20/61 Frederick J. BLACHLY, EOD 4/18/62 - transferred to AID on 11/5/62 - no other information available John B, BREEN, granted 180-day clearance on 1/23/61 - resigned 5/11/61 Dorothy BROWN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/30/54 Rueben BROWN , granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/5/62 Shirley M, BROWN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/5/59 and 10/26/59 ~19- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 25
we ee CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Velma S, BROWN, granted BO 10450 clearance on 11/13/56 Melvin BULLOCK, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/24/61 - trans- ferred to USACDA on 9/15/62 Dorothy L. CARTER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/26/59 ‘William R, CASPARIS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/6/62 James C, CAVILL, granted 180-day clearance on 12/19/60 - termination of appointment 5/12/61 Alvin COOPER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/4/56 - resigned 5/25/62 Cleveland Da COSTA, granted 180day clearance on 3/14/60 - re-~ signed 7/1/60 Marshall DATCHER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/29/54 John DENISON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/16/62 - resigned 5/19/62 Alfred D, DERRICOTTE, granted BO 10450 clearance on 5/15/61 ~ resigned 6/6/61 Fabian F. DESEORDES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/8/60. and. 6/22/61 - resigned 9/38/61 . Earnest DIXON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/22/62 Vertie Mae DUNCAN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/11/54 - transferred 12/26/59 Lewis M, EDMUNDS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/7/59 ~ resigned 9/30/60 Florence ELLIS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/3/56 and 3/28/56 ~20- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 276
ay CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Howard FELDSTEIN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/28/62 - , resigned 6/29/62 Damon A, FLEMONS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/19/56 Gwendolyn C, FINNEY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/5/61 - transferred to NASA on 12/18/61 John Donald FISHER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/27/61 - resigned 4/26/61 John H, FRAZIER, granted 180-day clearance on 1/11/61 - resigned 5/1 fou Ella L, FYKES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/10/60 - resigned 7/7/61 Freddie GANTT nee HENRY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/21/55 and 5/27/55 Kenneth E, GARY, granted 180day clearance on 3/22/60 - resigned 9/21/60 Carnetta N, GASKINS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/21/55 Evelyn B, GORDON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/17/54 Robert GRAVES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/12/56 Willie GRAY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 11/8/56 William T, GREENE, granted BO 10450 clearance on 8/3/59 - resigned 1/4/63 William T, GRIER, granted 180-day clearance on 3/14/60 - resigned 5/20/60 and 5/11/61 Carl R. HAGEN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/13/60 - resigned 8/25/61 -21- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 2?7
HW 50529 CONFIDENTIAL 7 OSWALD, Lee Harvey Mamie L, HALE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/14/58 - trans- ferred to Department of Army on 2/18/62 Evelyn HALL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/1/54 — Harry M, HANDLEY, granted 180-day clearance on 12/19/60 ~ resigned 5/11/61 Charles E. HANRAHAN, JR., granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/22/61 . terminated, job completed 5/12/61 Miriam HARDMAN nee OLIVER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/31/60 Thomas W, HARGIS, granted 180-day clearance on 3/10/60 - term- inated, job completed 6/10/60 - granted 180-day clearance on 2/4/61 - terminated, job completed 5/12/61 Richard B, HAWTHORNE, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/16/61 terminated, job completed 5/12/61 Loretta HELM, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/25/56 Dexter L, HILL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/9/60 - com- pleted assignment 6/10/60 - granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/4/61 - released 5/19/61 Jon D, HOLSTINE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/5/60 - resigned 10/26/62 - transferred to USIA William R, HUMPHREY, granted 180-day clearance on 1/23/61 - job completed 5/17/61 Allen L, INGLING, eremees 180-day clearance on 12/16/60 - resigned 2/9/61 Dorothy JACKSON, granted 180-day clearance on 3/2/59 and 10/26/59 transferred to CSC on 3/19/60 / 22< CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 23
LL y CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Virginia JEROME, granted EO 10450 clearance on n 10/20/56 - resigned 12/23/60 Mary V, JETER, granted 180-day clearance on 5/17/62 - case canceled Albert L. JOHNSON, grantee EO 10450 clearance on 8/7/62 ~ resigned 2/4/62 Sylvia JOHNSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/10/57 and 12/4/57 Valerie R. JOHNSON (MOYO), granted 180—day clearance on 2/20/63 resigned 3/7/64 Vince JOHNSON, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/22/57 Geraldine JONES nee MONTAGUE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/23/60 John Albert JONES, granted 180-day clearance on 3/26/62 - resigned 7/20/62 Eloise L, JORDAN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 11/2/54 Bruno KORSAK, granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/5/58 Herbert W, KUEHNE, granted 180-day clearance on 3/10/60 - ~ resigned 5/13/60 Richard B, KURTICH, granted 180-day clearance on 3/16/60 - resigned 10/7/60 Nancy H, LANNING, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/16/60 Thomas B, LEDDY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/24/61 and 2/20/62 resigned 5/16/62 Bertha C, W, LEE, granted BO 10450 clearance on 7/11/63 ~ resigned 10/4/63 Milton F, LEE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/9/57 =23~ CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 29
HW 50529 CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Mamie D, LEWIS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/21/59 Gerald LUNT, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/16/60 and 5/31/61 transferred to Department of Justice on 12/16/61 Eugene R, LYERLY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/3/59 William H, LYLES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/7/54 - resigned 4/23/64 Robert H, McFADDEN, granted EO 10450 elearance on 8/26/60 - resigned 9/30/60 Willie McNEIL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/28/56 William Glenn MALCOMSEN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/22/60 ' resigned 9/21/62 "William T, MALONE, granted BO 10450 clearance on 6/6/55 _ Alexander W. MAXWELL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/10/55 Lawrence Edward MENDEL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/26/64, Willian K, MITTENDORF, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/9/60, 4/11/61 and 3/28/62 - resigned 6/11/62 'Margarie McCOY nee MONROE, granted BO 10450 clearance on 11/5/56 Rose A, MOORE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/6/60 ~ resigned 7/26/60 Gloria J, MURRAY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/16/63 Cardoza NELSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 9/13/54 Mora E, NICKENS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/20/63 James O'DONNELL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/10/62 - resigned 8/16/63 William H, OSCANYAN, granted 180-day clearance on 3/10/60 ~ job completed 6/14/60 -2h= CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 30
ro an CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Thomas D, PAGE, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/28/56 - transferred to FHA on 12/16/61 Eugene PALMORE, granted waPy! clearance on 8/15/63 and 11/12/63 ~- resigned 6/26/64 Charles L, PERRY, granted BO 10450 clearance on 7/25/61 - ‘terminated, temporary employment 8/8/6 1 Nellie M, PERSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/2/59 William N, POINDEXTER, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/22/60 and 12/7/60 ' Richard R, PRESTON, grange EO 10450 clearance on 8/11/60 ~ resigned 9/9/60 Bernard N, PRICE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/20/60 and 11/30/60 terminated, temporary employment 4/11/61 Carl H, PRIESTLAND, erent eo 180-day clearance on 3/14/60 - resigned 9/30/60 Denis QUIGLEY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/¢/60 - terminated, temporary employment 5/19/61 Robert F. QUINN, Jr., grange EO 10450 clearance on 5/2/61 - released 5/3/61 Shirley A, RANDALL, yn EO 10450 clearance on 7/30/63 - terminated 2/10/64 Mary E, RICHARDS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/24/57 - resigned 2/3/61 Marcia A ROBERTS, ores. 180-day clearance on 6/25/62 - resigned 9/4/62 Nazaire ROBERTS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/29/62 -25- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 31
- HW 50529 CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Susan S, CARTER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/10/63 and Cosmic and Cryptographic clearance Daniel W, CHRISTENSEN, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/16/63 and Cryptographic clearance Mary Ann CHUDZINSKI, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/26/63 and 1/17/63 and Cryptographic clearance ~ resigned 11/23/63 Marcia B, CRAWFORD, granted BO 10450 clearance on 12/24/63 and 10/2/63 John H, DIEFFENDERFER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/1/63 and Cryptographic clearance Elizabeth DOIMAT, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/3/63 and Cryptographic clearance Charles D, ELLISON, granted BO 10450 clearance on 1/22/63 and Cryptographic clearance Audrey C, EMELDI, granted FEO 10450 clearance on 8/14/63 and Cryptographic clearance Bernard J, FINAN, III, granted no clearance - resigned 2/14/64 Joseph P, FORRY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/1/63 and Cryptographic clearance Sue R, FRAGALA, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/27/63 Mary E, GROENER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/31/62 and Cryptographic clearance Marlene D. HAGELE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/4/63 and Cryptographic clearance -29- CONFIDENTIAL Docld: 322781722 Page 35
| . CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Jay D, HARTZ,. granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/20/63 and Cryptographic clearance Elizabeth Jane B, HAYES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/17/63 Lorraine JACKSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/25/63 Sylvester A, JACKSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/28/62 Albert W. JAREK, granted EO 10450 clearance on 11/19/62 and Cryptographic clearance Barbara M, JOHNSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/10/63 and Cryptographic and Seato clearance Frederick W. KAFES, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/12/63 - resigned 1/9/64 Sharon A, _KLOEFPING, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/23/63 and Cryptographic clearance Franklin A, KOEBLER, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/4/62 | and Cryptographic clearance - resigned 9/20/63 Damon V, LABRIE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/7/63 and ; Cryptographic clearance Catherine L, LEONARD, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/29/63 and Cryptographic clearance R, N, LITTLEFIELD, II, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/7/63 _and Cryptographic clearance - Termination 3/25/64 Lono B, LUM, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/28/63 and Crypto- graphic clearance Eugene R, LYERLY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/3/59 ~ -30~ CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 36
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Suzanne E, MARKLEY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/25/63 and Cryptographic clearance Paula M, MICGHINARD, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/27/63 and Cryptographic clearance Gary E, ANGELINE, granted 180—day clearance on 4/28/62 ~- resigned 9/11/62 Stephanie U, BAILEY, canceled 7/31/63 James A, BARRETT, granted 180-day clearance on 2/12/63 - canceled 5/20/63 Laura M, BEACH, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/26/62 - resigned 9/19/62 Louise R. BERNARDI, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/19/61 - resigned 9/6/63 Frederick J. BLACHLY, granted EO 10450 clearance on. 1/20/58 Sidney H, BLAKELY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/28/62 Beatheliff BLANCHITTI, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/17/62 termination 7/25/62 Patricia K, BROOKS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/9/62 - separation 2/8/64 Houston T, BROWN, File retained by D. D, DALEY of SY/I Mary W. BURNS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/26/62 and Cryptographic clearance - resigned 8/17/63 Samel A, CAGNA, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/12/61 and Cryptographic and Cosmic clearance Douglas L. CALDWELL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/2/62 and 1/10/63 - resigned 5/24/63 -31- CONFIDENT I AL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 37
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey William R, CASPARIS, (see list above) Albert H, COLEMAN, Jr., granted 180-day clearance ~- EO 10450 pending Patricia R, DALY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/27/61 Joan E, DELANEY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 2/25/62 - resigned 8/10/62 Ernest (E, or G.) DIXON, (see list above) Lenora J, DRETZKA, granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/15/62 Paul D, ELEY, granted BO 10450 clearance on 2/6/63 - resigned | 9/21/63 Allen P, ENGLEKING, granted EC 10450 clearance on 7/18/62 - termination 8/24/62 Arthur E, ERNST, no record Jay H, FAIRFAX, granted 180-day clearance on 3/8/62 - termination 6/25/62 Louis J, FAORS, resigned 2/8/63 Howard FELDSTEIN, granted BO 10450 clearance on 5/28/62 - resigned 6/29/62 Joseph P, FORRY, granted HO 10450 clearance on 2/1/63 and Cryptographic clearance William R, GEE, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 4/11/58 Billy L. GIPSON, granted 180-day clearance on 4/20/62 - resigned " 7/27/62 Robert J. HARLOW, no record HARLOW or HARLON ~32- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 DBocld:32281722 Page 33 een
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey Nancy Faye HOUSTON, granted 180~day clearance on 7/12/63 = canceled 8/23/63 Ronald c. HAMBRICK, granted EO 10450 clearance on 1/14/64 - declined 3/18/64 John R, HAMILTON, granted 180-day clearance on 5/4/62 - term- ination 9/11/62 Melvin E. HARRISON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/30/62 - resigned 7/21/62 Irvin HICKS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/13/61 Thomas S, JACKSON, Jr., granted EO 10450 clearance on 6/18/62 - _ termination 7/10/62 Donald E, JENNINGS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/5/61 Albert L, JOHNSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/7/62 - resignation 7/4/62 Kenneth A, JOHNSON, granted EO 10450 clearance on 11/9/62 - resigned 11/8/63 John A, JONES, (see list above) Phillys W. KATZ, granted EC 10450 clearance on 6/30/62 Raymond M, KEATING, granted 180-day clearance on 6/12/62 - - resigned 8/17/62 Willis D, KING, granted EO 10450 clearance on 12/21/61 and Cryptographic clearance Harold P. KLINE, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/11/61 and Cryptographic clearance Alberta LITTS, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/26/62 - resigned 8/11/62 ~33- CONFIDENTIAL HW 50529 Docld: 322781722 Page 39 aot
CONFIDENTIAL OSWALD, Lee Harvey George A, MAPP, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/11/62 - resigned 9/11/62 . Donald W. MAUNEY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 8/23/62 and Cryptographic clearance Lo. --—Mary-Az.MeCRONI, granted EOC 10450 clearance on 9/27/62 Floyd R, McDANIEL, canéeled 7/5/62 ; John J, McMILLER, granted EO 10450 clearance~on-12/11/61 Bruce R, MEISER, resigned 12/21/62 - ( _ Lawrence E, MENDEL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 5/26/64 Arthurine MITCHELL, granted EO 10450 clearance on 3/26/59 Edward L, MOODY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 7/15/63 and 2/4/63 - canceled 2/25/63 - 7/15/63 Adrinen M, MORSE, pending re: DOBLY Mary M, MURPHY, resigned 12/8/62 Peter K, MURPHY, granted EO 10450 clearance on 10/5/61 ATTACHMENTS: (To original only) 1, Memorandum to Mr. Grignon from Mr. Gentile dated 6/2/64 Le 2, Memorandum from Mr. Schwartz to Mr. Gentile dated 5/20/64 3. Report of the Department of State on Lee Harvey OSWALD 5. Memorandum of Mr. Carlos M. Yordan to Mr. Mason LaSelle dated July 6, 1964 (with its attachments) SY/I/WFO:LCKachulis:am ~ ae i . CONFIDENTIAL | AW 50529 Docld:32261722 Page 40 4. Portions of the Department's response to the Commission of May 8, 1964 ° | { ~ ree i a ee Te a whe