"Assistant Attorney General for Administration: _ March 7, 197 ed | / Nicholas P, Callahan oO gto Associate vata FE Sewslidy VS VVosommy AGENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE (GAO) AND. THE OFFICE Da{MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) CONCERNING INGE CLIGENCE ACTIVITIES naman: 1 TTA Satie MEOTCA DE i PERE LE On the afternoon of March 7, 1975, Mr. James F. Hoobler, Director, Management Programs and Budget Staff, furnished a copy of a - memorandum fom GAO to the Depity Director of the OMB which requested information conseriing appropriatioas, oxtlays and legislative authority for such appropriations and exponditures, 1 5"- _. With regard to the FBI's Intelligence Division, a response wag reqiested concerning the amounts of budget authority for iscsi years . 1974 and 1975 and actual outlays for fiscal year 1974; an indication of where in the Foderal budeet these amounts or any portion of them appear; any languare in the budget wiich explains or incicates the purpoce or pirposes for whigh sich emounts will bo spent; and the legislative authority for each, of the liated aenronrintions and exygnditarcs. a f an Ce ee " aan tts wi The Wel doss nat receive buigst authority or account far budest oxtlays scecifically for internal security or intalligence activities or for exy organizational component handling sich matters. The FBI's budgot request for funds to hundlo internal sesusity oF intelligonce mutters cis’ sat forth wudsr the budgst - activity: "fso-wliy and Criminal Investigations." Based cu manuever itilicction sarvoys whisa have been condisted, it is estiuinted that aspromimoately 23 porecnt of the FRI's renorrees Go to support activities under the saneevision of te Intelligence Divicior. Wis estimated, therefors, that in te fiscal year 1674 the Puls bucget guhority contained ; _ fonds exnounties to some 991 niliiieu and that it had oxtlays.of nbout $03 million -f Assoc. Dir. afd gappers tise netiviies, The emosut contmined fa tha FBI's budyet authoriiy £ ee darsor ths fecal year-1970 is aiisa-24 to he $163 milion, —_ pele pinal Filed Ia 26 /9/ Ocp. AD Inv si Acst Dir. i¥ * ae The poraeso for whieh thene funds are ex-sied ave set fact Ents Affe — an. Justifiertion ah wonyin Imdget ogtimates cubcitted te the WONT as Gon. inv. i - . . § . ENE pce Qu C2- //C39S- spoction .” . “4 2 net ee, ; See desienated and note on page two.... . Spoe. Inv A a ER it I! NOT. RECORDED. Z Sichetert * mid foe a= r . ~ a : . am
Assistant Attorney General for Administration In the FBI's material for fiscal years 1974 and 1975 these nurposes are set forth under the section "Cbjective" end they are captioned "Domestic Intelligence" and "Coordination and Dissemination of Security Data." Additional data is furnished in each of those years under the section "Status of Base Program" and is captioned "Internal Security Operations. " . _ The legislative authority for the appropriation and expenditares for the fiscal year 1974 is contained in the Departments of State, Justice, . Commerce, and The Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1974 (Public Law 93-162). The legislative authority for fiscal year i97Sis . contained in the Appropriation Act for the same agencies (Public Law 93-433). . + . cin | 1 - Mr. James F.dloobler, Director it Management Programs and Budget Staff 1 - Mr. Wannali - Enclosure 1 - Mr. Mintz - Enclosure 1 - Mr. Moore - Enclosure NOTE: The attached inquiry from GAO is being coordinated by the OMB. It was received by us from the Department at 1:14 p.m., 3/7/75, with a request that the information be furnished by the close of business the same date. | AW 55073 Docld:329689530 Page.6
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ° ROUTE SLIP ! " Take nocessary action CJ to Mr. Hoobler ‘ Approval or signature Cj es Comment 0D i Prepare reply CJ i Discuss with me C : a F or your informetion (7 See remarks below FROM Jim Purcell spaaahpiresteniotememmmmmemsnmene  paiemeneeieemeeieneeremet REMARKS Mr. Hoobler: ~ . . . ot , Will you please provide the requested ' information indicated by Mr. Scantieburg's memo Of February 24 pertaining to the FBI. Item "8" which refers to the FBI Internal Security Division should be interpreted as the FBI's Intelligence Division. I would appreciate having this information, if possible, by close of business, today. Ge or’ | STATED puL EBLE. E MG ONE FOR 4 “EV AUG Fi C2-INLB IS ENCLOSURE
| | | \ | { 2 55073 Docld:32989530 Page 8 —— iw: ! WAITED, STATES GENERAL ACCOU! 0. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20543 any DIVISION OF FINANCIAL AND GENERAL MAMAG EME, NTS TUES ¢ Mx. Paul H. O'Neill _ Deputy Director Office of Management and Budect Dear Mr. O'Neill:: . We have recently received a request from a Member of the Senate Budget Committee for our assistance in obtaining budget data with respect to various intelligence activities of the Federal Government. We have the budget data that is publicly available. However, as you are: aware, most of the requested information is not readily available and is usually provided to the Congress in limited briefings. We have discussed this matter with representatives of the Senate Budget Committee: and it is their desire to‘obtain the requested data by other than oral briefings. ’ ~N {he request involves amounts of budget authority for fiscal years 3974 and 1575 by eacu of ithe Lollowing agencios, and tha actuel outlays by each such agency during FY 1974. 1. Central Intelligence Agency 2. National Security Agency “s+ 3. “Defense Intelligence Agency ‘4. Avmy Intelligence 5. Naval Intelligence 6. Aix Force Intelligence (including the National Reconnaissance Office) 7. State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research 8. Federal Bureau of Investigation Internal Security Division ~ 62-S/IC BIG. 4 | ENCLOSURE H f
oo i , eld: 32969530 9. Atoaic Enerpy Commission Niviaton of Inte 10. Yreasury Department Intelligence Division : 7 The Committce would a also Like to know the following i “Where in the Federal budget does each or any portion of the above-mentioned amounts appear? Indicate to the closest possible degree of specificity, designating such amounts by the accounts or Line items, or combina- tions of accounts or Line itews, under which the amounts are. included, and any language in the budget which explains or indicates the purposé or purposes for which such amounts will be spent. “What is the lepislative authority for each of the above-listed appropriations and expenditures?" We would appreciate your reviewing these items and responding at your earliest convenience. We have advised members of your staff of this request. We will be happy to work directly with your. staff to meet this congressional need. . To the extent that any of this information is not available, we will need, in writing, the legislative citations or precedents for not supplying the data, co / : Sincerely yours, “~ ‘ AK ne uO See. DD Scantlebury . : oo, Director aeuianaem| tenner Bat ee. RE Mere pene ete mencar caemennate meneame tent NAR INIA Aart ys MaeAttn |: AIR me yy NN me arg o# BY
—e OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 ~ 5050-106 MAY 1962 EDITION . GSA GEM, REG. NO. 37 ; UNITED STATES . \ 4 w aes AD a 7 4 Dep. Memorandum ar al Z|  cavnanee rete aL | ro. :MR. CALLAHAN PATE Oo me 75 % hye Me wwe! Gon, Inv. a Hi FROM : d. B, ADAMS) HEREIN i ere . ; ; Incpeet Bee . af intel LLL: “b) . pars_ | /-7- rE nl fh “ iain ; . cf 4 ci pres - Plon. & Evol. \ugyect; CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY fone Cnn ee + a7 . . GO Roe Hlale Vales OZ at oens' “Ed L ee am > vie I . uf hee Rm. \ : D ivector See’y oe: METIS Tey"aeked that in connection with future testimony " ; we prepare two papers” One is to be a dissertation about our procedures fhes oe in opening and closing domestic security cases, including the application ac ‘ of criteria for opening such cases and determining how long the cases st should remain in a pending status(o. The second paper is to involve the ; jurisdiction of the President to authorize unusual investigative techniques in foreign intelligence investigations such as wiretaps, microphones and surreptitious entries. This should include a definition of his Constitutional powers and the derivative author ity invested in the Attorney General and the FBI, A / ry ‘ » in connection with these two paper S, it is desired that there be Ny coordination between the Intelligence Division, Legal Counsel Division SS and writers in the External Affairs Division, who should participate in the af basic research and discussions and prepare the final paper outlining the research and analysis of the other two divisions. | : @ Mr. Kelley's purpose is to have papers available on various topics such as this which reduce technical dissertations to a style which can be used for argumentative purposes in an easily understood form. The types of questions he receives generally do not require a highly technical response but a concise presentation of the issues involved and the propriety of our rocedur és, -, . me GIMME 3 457s ‘ACTION: | . pel) NOTRECORDEDE:< = | For information. on eRe | : JBA:ame\ yy ie 1 - Mr. Jenkins i - Mr. Moore 1 - Mr. Mints 1 - Mr. Wannall qn 77 tad e ak, ih YEN ange wid Liv ); LB 4 APR ne — Page 10
ne | OPTIONAL fonm NO, 10 MAY 1962, EDITION on Ged, RIG. N* 27 “ UNITED STATES 6... MENT v Memorandum 5010~105 . . < TO : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 30-6-75 HH rnok\ ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED x HEREIN IS UNGLASSIPIED Assoc. Dir. Asst. Dir.: . ident. Dep. AD Adm. — Dep. AD Inv. Admin, Comp. Syst. Ext. Affairs Files & Com. Gen. Inv. 7 Ins pectic on >" alt ree - ypron Legal Counsel doh / DATE j- ot) B 2 iene HOUSE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION IN~ 20 PRC Rt Pffecin aa INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS SUBCOMMITTER ~~ Training THE (GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Telephone fal b- ING, | MARCH. 5, 1975 os Fa 7" a ; Ceipin Satact Co, mite. ow “aha gahteee Net Vel log i Mea -This*Comimittee*which is-chaired by Congresswoman’ Bella iat ‘apzug (D-N.Y.) convened on March 5th to hear testimony from Director of “ithe CIA, William E. Colby. It was brought out at the hearing that the rad) iC entral ‘Intelligence Agency had furnished information in their files pertaining == jto Congresswoman Abzug the previous evening, March 4th, with the exception y jot information which could not be disclosed without compromising a sensitive source or intelligence gathering procedure. Director Colby also advised ~ 3Congresswoman Abzug in response to her inquiry that the source of some ‘ fitems that she was in receipt of had been concealed because it was from "p pother agency. ‘Colby did not disclose the identity of that agency. “—— j q t : SUBJEC Pres Legal Coun. S aamn deet feat Ciaenenas acetal oe nett eta ead ht / 5 eh te pate . % a te Ae ;P ; si i < ad OE Oe ae! Congresswoman Abzug asked Colby, and he agreed to }communicate with that agency and have them contact Congresswoman Abzug; . {concerning the aforementioned information. By way of background according / fa _ {to a memorandum captioned "Bella S. Abzug (D-N.Y.)," dated 3-4-75, the iCIA asked for and received permission from this Bureau to release the Partie? ox icontents of unclassified reports furnished the CIA by the FBI and could be ,  tfurnished by the CIA to Congresswoman Abzug. From the remarks made iby Director Colby, it would appear that the topic of discussion between Congresswoman Abzug and Director Colby pertained to these documents ' ; land that we can expect some communication from the CIA in accordance i. + . with Congresswoman Abzug's request. . . aredir bet ~e i ©) an! During the question and ; answer portion of Director Colby’ s " festimony, Director Colby stated that the CIA would obtain information _ pertaining to American citizens in only two instances in the future. (1) Infor- ~ ination developed incidental to their surveillance of a foreign targets Cateaageonn pombe \ - gi eh 1945 haan * ? ‘ * } 3 i —— a Ve af fe / ere anmereremnenene at & nak a * x, aaa 1 -Mr. Adams 1 ~ Mr. McCreight 1 -~Mr. Wannall 1 - Mr. Daly Cages wesc arses T-Mr. Mintz i - ron 1,396 ARS Sips oe fay 0.2. / ly3 EG “ aq eae f aN PVD: as, (8) = Siee73 conmmunt ¢ ae } 18°, apd. 5078 me 28 1975 Ar tf _ MAY 28 a ; S3--Bocld:32969530 Page 11 ate a ee _ ~ os see
Yon ene sete atin dita wend Me ronan, 2 Ae mene tm ee ee oe wore Legal Counsel to J. B. Adams Memo Re: HOUSE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION IN INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS SUBCOMMITTEE (2) Investigations conducted pursuant to FBI requests. He was asked what the CIA's response would be to an improper request for investigation concerning American citizens. He indicated that they would refuse such a request and had done so in the past. The implication being from the context of the question that the FBI had made an improper request of the CIA. In view of the wide scope of authority enjoyed by Congresswoman Abzug's Committee and the realistic expectation the FBI will have to testify before this Committee, it would be to our advantage for the Intelligence Division, through liaison, with the Central Intelligence Agency to cbtain a transcript of this Committee hearing so that same might be reviewed and possible questions contained therein concerning FBI investigations be analyzed and responses prepared. ' RECOMMENDATION: Intelligence Division take action in line with the above. eo oe . WW 5507355) Docld:32989530 Page 12
4 * oo = n : ee, <A ST tet ae mane ee aw Ent oe ess cae aMmm 5 me crenetletntat mihi mntmnteinnem aautmatiehtindteinin etaatrinmapanmautrenmannanae an einetanlNeehs i ne ween met IRMA un am yee nmnbinemar aterm i - | —~FD-350 (Rev. 7-16-63) ‘w 4 Ae. on y De, sis . | acct Bi inl, Ad Com oe yst. . ava : Fie & Com o 3 Gen. Inv. 2 ae f Ident. oN. 4 Laboratory _—_- Plan. & Eval. Spee Tay. CN Tre: eZ ne un. Pelodnts ne Rm. | Director See’y __ i RATER NTI Assign Congress ee eee ee ' To Hunt Bombers - | Creeps SN ad Sed a ee eae we Pe. of ; , The Star Beacon ~ - Here we goagain: o —_ (" D> oe Ashtabula, Ohio Le if iq The bombing of a State Departinert / a ‘. restroom and followup phone call from, ‘Sanst- 1 Ct 7 -_ 7 — YW { someone calling itself the “Weather Un-. Gerground” j is reminiscent of times past. {° Many of these congressmen and: sen- . ‘| tors knew bloody well what these Agel — ; ‘The bombers are apparently protest- ‘ies were doing in years past, but never ing any economic aid to non-Communists raised a whisper, let alone a howl. Nov), in South Vietnam and Cambodia. _ with home-grown terrorism seemingly — "| behind us, the legislators play dumb . There’ sa certain i irony in thet timing.- and feign "shock or outrage over what ~QOG + ares ate ae enaetinde patent Sete ate meena t At the very moment the CIA and FBlare. they call “disturbing revelations.” . 3 —— being raked over the coals by self-right- soe eous members of Congress, a radical . ‘nthe * - You can bet if a bomb went off in the group like the ones under surveillancs Senate or House chambers, Congress. hi if in the late ’60s and early ’70s Pulls off 8 twould call out the FBI, CIA and any other ORIGINAL gtduuw i (A as le i. Pronist act. ! agency versed in intelligence g gathering. We wouldn’t blame the FBI for turn. ition: 130-79 ing the investigation of the latest bomb- - What's more, ‘the legislators would. * uthor: ing over to the congressional committee wonder why the FBY and CIA rie auor: Bon Rowley investigating government surveillance. ifamediately produce the 10 most ttle: Let the legislators handle it. , Suspects. Miscellaneous . Some measure of watebhulness must ‘““Where’s your siwveillance mechan haracter: . . fie maintained over agencies like the jsm,”somesenatorwoulddemand. | ¢. 9 Public relation fer and CIA. The repugnant aspect ‘a i ifesification, Matters | What we have, folks, is Congress i Tce Office: Cleveland i all is congressmen leading the media its hy ypocritical worst. ; . ” - bandwagon to roast the agencies, U1] Being Investigated NoTREGORDED — 46 MAR 28 1975 ae eee MW VARS 1197 \ NO, 55073 Docld:32969530 Page 13
TO : eee ent eee pene FROM \ SUBJECT: \. + FZ A RIG TE &, & NES f-2-A¢ re a, LASSYPIED ar /aé ALG LIPOMA TON COTAT mrs WG M0 1; <> POREXY 6s DATS Po HW 55073 - Gen. Inv. Pa 1 - Each Assistant Director — >We 6 regar Intell. Enclosure WOC :ebe i’ , (17) < CONTINUED - OVER iy AAD D a, i 5010-106 OPNONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSASE"N,. REG. NO. 27 . - UNITED STATES GO RNMENT M, d 1 ~ Mr. Catiahan emorandum 1” Me. Adams i 1 ® Comp. Syst. —_ . , Ext. Affairs —_ Mr e W. R. Wannall DATE: 3/21/75 Flee & Cone 1 - Mr. Cregar ae SENSTUDY 75 * Spee, Vv Training Telephone Rm. — Director Sec’y __ This memorandum reports the results of a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional Review of the Intelligence Community, (hereafter referred to as the Group), held at CIA Headquarters on the even- ing of 3/20/75. . This meeting was chaired by Mr. Colby in his role as the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). In attendance were Mr. Philip Buchen, Counsel to the President; Deputy AG Laurence Silberman; Associate Deputy AG James Wilderotter; Mr, John 4 Clarke, Associate Deputy to the DCI, as well as officials from /, Defense, Treasury and the Energy Research and Development YA Administration (formerly the Atomic Energy Commission). The meeting was called to have all agencies identify (1) Types of information that could not be disclosed to Con- gressional Committees, (2) Types of information the disclosure of which was arguable, and (3) Types of information that could be disclosed to Congressional Committees. The FBI was asked to lead off the presentation. The Group was informed that we were reluctant to discuss sensitive matters in such a large group jand we asked that the Group be reduced to a select few people who would have to have knowledge of sensitive FBI operations. After some discussion, the White House agreed this was a good procedure and it now appears that Mr. Buchen of the White House, one of his associates and probably Mr. Silberman will arrange at some future date to discuss the sensitive type information embraced in the above three questions. No definite date was set for this review and presumably either Mr. Clarke's office or Mr. Silberman will be in contact with the Bureau 44 this, ye oy . 4 REC-28 GA. //C295- Enclosed herewith is a paper prepared by Mr.. Clarke which attempts to outline a course the DCI can take“¥#*coordinating inquiries from the Senate and House Select Committees. Although eit APR 9 1976 | DoclId: 32989530 Page 14
Memorandum for Mr. Wannall RE: SENSTUDY 75 attempt to get some clarification and hopefully be in a position to provide some information as to how the White House, Mr. Silberman and Mr. Wilderotter wanted to proceed, It is the opinion of both Mr, Mintz and Mr. Wannall that the Bureau must immediately set up a Task Force to handle ‘the tremendous amount of information that will be required from the FBI, including the coordination of our responses with other agencies who might be involved in such an answer, as well as to insure that both the Department of Justice and the White House are fully informed. We can anticipate very short deadlines and requests for information that are not readily retrievable from Bureau records without considerable research involving several divisions :in' the Bureau, ACTION: mat Nest Force be immediately created within the Bureau to facili ate the collation of information as well as the coordination of such information responsive to the requests we can anticipyte receiving from Select Committees of _the Congress. pee Fat ee a ” aibility for THE Nok: Principal respon” sibrl Jy Vigo d be the Intelligence D! ea 7asc Fare’. Goo! ney and collection and yeu" in terms “ aaa documents, hovsever, 3” e of \nfarmattan 7 . re a each | otier diwedual Should bo a aig bof in wandle Paaes 4 rar + dwisrak as contacts +O | qd to eapodi Fe PeoP re u1sts of +ho diver on —_ aoe, mn pd ' yi 4S eee of “Lye sonal? Foam MS Gato he ONS td SS es ke brie ase ject Saves nist hie s ated ' a Hous ¢ is an ee Pa ey | me E the regees's te of SU a ee td cons ender de velop? thts “abtat ‘ Div, Shee ls HESS goat wit Services Hast uw ‘4, | candiave fo. pecesaet f° ; i Od hega/ Couns wil ant itl ele tard fee oF Hos voctasaeoaox Page 16 yh e HW 55073
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY STAFF 20 March 1975 anm vy This represents a working paper, It attempts to outline a course the DCI can take in dealing with the Senate/House Select Committees! inquiries. The details herein have not yet been discussed or coordinated with representa- tives of the Ad Hoc Group of USIB. , sop lA Chase AD/DCI/IC ove ff Ml @ aa Pane Fe CAME ALS an fir SES IAS ue Ake sy SOIT CEN a reset scant ACTION ce _— A rr ea A gt oR te oo Pw tp “ 5 Pa ree aes . oy = eae 4 eek : wth KS eek Gaye dp ge ato arse 3 Soe ree’ Lan . “o / Gir. 62.NWo2¢c-Y HW 55073 Docld:32989530 Page 17
\ . « “ . * , . @  ) ¥ « = In treating with Congressional inquiries, the Director of Central Intelligence will provide leadership to the Intelligence Community. The Associate Deputy to the DCI for the Intelligence Community, supported by the Intelligence Community Staff, will provide the principal staff direction and congressional liaison for the DCI in these matters. He will serve as a focal point for coordination among Community entities and assure communication with the Executive Office as appropriate. The IC Staff with the assistance of. USIB-Agencies.will provide legal, ; security, substantive, and registry support structured so as to assure totte _ “appropriate support to the DCI and the Intelligence Community. ' The: _AD/DCI/IC will chair an Ad Hoc Coordinating Group of USIB as a | principal mechanism for exchanging information and coordinating USIB } activities with respect to the inquiry where needed. The AD/DCI/IC and pS the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating Group will establish periodic and special ; | ' "time sensitive reporting to keep the DCI, the USIB principals, andinvolved --> Executive Branch agencies advised on USIB Agencies’ liaison relationships with the Select Committees and on substantive exchanges in response to Select Committee inaniries, Where useful, enmmon standards and procedures will be developed by the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating Group. B. COORDINATION 1. Physical security is proceeding well. The Chairman of the Security Committee of USIB has been assigned as the principal Intelligence Community officer on physical security and clearance matters. Agreements have been reached with the Senate Select Committee on physical security standards. These standards have been provided to the House Select Committee Staff. The Senate has arranged for central facilities which meet the physical security standards and has appointed a full-time security officer who will © provide certification of personnel clearances, The House at the present time is not planning central facilities and we understand will be dispersed in at least three different locations. ‘Discussion of classified information will occur outside of the - security-approved Committee rooms-and particularly in the offices of the members of the Select Committee. - Agreement has been reached that the FBI will approach the House and Senate Staff Directors and offer technical sweep services for the Congressional offices involved. Pan Ok rere a z patito te we om 7 “Enae way ae pee Tay : - 2 we She i “ . * = ? an Pr ry 7 fae onvers oes ae ‘ 2" wee f at oo . ; : oe ves “pe Z ? roe * 7 oe Lite Tye v4, rem ft Faye Peay * 3 ee ay Laretag # NW 55073 Docldi 32989530 Page 18 ; qos 62 G2 FS of {
e 2. Personnel security investigations on Select Committee Staff are under way by the FBI. It is understood that upon completion of Staff investigations, the Select Committee Chairman will-certify to the DCI the Top Secret clearances of Committee Staff. The DCI, through his Intelligence Community Staff, will pass along the certification to the security elements of the respective agencies. Compartmented clearance arrangements and certification also have been agreed with the Senate Select -Committee Staff. Similar arrangements have been discussed with the House Select Committee Staff. . . 3. Secrecy agreements for the Senate Select Committee Staff employees are being drafted and the AD/DCI/IC, supported by the CIA General Counsel - and the Associate Deputy Attorney General, will negotiate similar arrange- ments with the House. The DCI policy is to insist upon secrecy agreements. . 4, Arrangements will be established by the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating Group for the recording of documents, testimony and transcripts, and for procedures to protect sources and methods which may be contained in the miatcxvial Mowing to the Select Coulimuiliees fruni all eayoucics. A Ceniral index service will be provided by the Intelligence Community Staff to serve the DCI and USIB Agencies. The following describes the general content of this central index. a. All requests received by USIB Agencies from the Select + Committees. b.. All other communications from Select Committees ¢ on subject a of interest to more than one agency. c. Reports and - responses by other non-intelligence elements of the Executive Branch (if desired by those elements). d. Identification of document responses provided.to. the requests | - and listing of subjects covered. e. Prepared statements and transcripts of testimony made to_ Select Committees. | ee - - Vv -£, Selective material released or-denied under the Freedom of 7 Information legislation which relates to subjects of interest to the ‘ Select Committees: . * “ , me . - - eo ae tS, to. RN a a 2 Se nt eA a a. Lat . iy oF Sone Gk to Ore tet, a3 Sy aR Pe eS caer Ki Pee Bed ae ke bok es Ps bet > tye int EH Sante ae otha g RSM BD BBS, eG TSR N EEE SP PB Se ee RL CeS eta ree gg Pre me ’ a ot en ~ - ’ » > ~ 2 \ He 55073 Docld:39969530 Page..19