14-00000 CiiGe: C/WH 5 liFO 3 oci, 0/OCI, DDP, ADDP, Cc/cA, $/¢ 2 : TL hy 8 SECRET 102344z 'N36488 nV 1383 DIR CITE MEXI 4544 Fe he RYBAT % ATTNes KNIGHT AND GALBOND | FOLLOWING FROM AMBASSADOR MANN TO ASST SECY MARTIN? (MESSAGE CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE) c/S COMMENT: *DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE YO CSSCP 210-313 CABLES. DISSEMINATION RESTRICTED. TEXT DIRECTED TO ANOTHER U.S. GOVT. ORGANIZATION. 4 a / rn \ bor i i GROUP 1 EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC, DOWNe CERAET GRADING AVA Mee aces Kea t hae Ba eet RUA Tea te
14-00000 ag ss * : ~ ~ “ . . DATE: 10 MAY 63... -....-. RECO: MAY 11 0156Z 63 FROM: MEXICO CITY , ROUTINE 7O : DIRECTOR IN 36483 WE ee ' FOLLOWING FROM AMSASSADOR MANN TO ASST SEcY NARTING Fibgoiis | hs “LOPEZ MATEOS, WHO IS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE TO FOREIGN OPINION, pect eS E HAS ASKED WIN SCOTT FOR COLLECTION OF U.S. VIEWS ON HIS A 2, FAVEHOA po Sib aby Ht ne RECENT LATIN AMERICAN DENUCLEARIZATION PROPOSAL o RECENTLY SCOTT FURNISHED LOPEZ MATEOS EUROPEAN NEWS CLIPPINGS ON HIS TOUR, PARTICULARLY WEST BERLIN WALL INCIDENT. WHICH SEEMED TO DISTRUB LOPEZ MATEOS BECAUSE KE WAS PRAISED BY EAST GERMAN 43 on 4 PRESS BUT CRITICIZED BY VESTERN PAPERS. ON NEV REQUEST SCOTT TOLD LOPEZ MATEOS THAT HE WOULD PROBABLY BE ASLE FURNISH ONLY ULS; NEWS NEDIA COVERAGE AND REACTION ON DENUCLEARIZATION AS HE, SCOTT; DOES NOT DEAL AT OFFICIAL LEVEL ON SUCH POLICY MATTERS. “BECAUSE OF CA) LOPEZ MATEOS' SENSITIVITY TO OPINION ABROAD? (8) FACT THERE HAS BEEN NO REACTION FROM US OTHER THAN DEPT PRESS RELEASE AND. YOURCONVERSATION WITH CARRILLO FLORES (DEPT : ; CIRCULAR TELEGRAM 1878)2 AND (C) FACT THAT SOVIET, CUBAN AND POLISH AYSASSADORS HERE HAVE PUSLICLY COMMENTED FAVORABLY ON PROPOSED DENUCLEARIZATION, I SUGGEST VE CONSIDER FOLLOWING: "OREPARE A CAREFUL STATENENT IN WASHINGTON, ALONG LINES q ‘YOUR REMARKS TO CARRILLO FLORES COMMENTING AS FAVORABLY AS POSSIBLE ON LOPEZ MATEOS’S DENUCLEARIZATION PROPOSAL WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF SECRET
ee ee ae a wee . — PAGE 2 MEXICO CITY OUR OUN POLICY POSITION WHICH I*M SURE HAS BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OuT. THIS STATE'MENTCOULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO SOME SPECIFIC U.S. OFFICIAL OR TO UNIDENTIFIED HIGH OFFICIAL. IF APPROVED, SUSGEST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO SCOTT VIA CAS FOR CAS FOR DELIVERY TO LOPEZ MATEOS." | SECRET ee ee ee er : { SECRET
14-00000 ROUTING 8° CLASSMEED MESSAGE i 12-62 ong-, ¢. BUSTOS 4 | _ UNIT:  WH/2/MSXICO O INDE SECRET Tye ext : + §940 D NO INDEX Bn DATE : 23 APRI 196 32 FILE IN C$ FILE NO. HR 12 : MBXICO CITY , - taney ee 2, hb Rr Sh 28 fle FROM: DIREGTOR : CONF: wa & . so - |i eee a. an ; ; a | ROUTINE INFO 4 PG 2, CI/OA, CCS 2, S/o OF, Bie) MEXI : INFO . ' CITE DIR 35426 a REF: MBXI 4238 (IN 21625) # | 1, HEN HMMT 3380 RECEIVED AT END JAN FOR BUDGET REASONA AS DID NOT IMMEDIATELY SUBMIT LIENVOY PROJ ANENDMENT NEEDED TO PURCHASE NEW EQUIP, ESTIKATED COST FOR EQUIP WAS ROUGHLY $20,000. EQS ORIGINALLY UNDERSTOOD OLD EQUIP WOULD BE USED IN PROPOSED LITEMPO TAP CENYER AND CE UNIT. 4 : 2. WHEN HS RECEIVED HMMA 20890 IN MID MARCH SAYING LITEMPO ||“ WOULD USE MEXICAN EQUIP AND STATIOF WAS SUBMITTING PROJ OUTLINE, HQS CONTINUED HOLD LIENVOY REQUEST TO REVIEW ENTIRE LITEMPO/LIENVOY TAP “7 CENTER PROBLEM, HYS STILL AWAITING iITEMPO TAP PROJ. : 3. IN VIEW LARGE COST HQS WONDERS WHETHSR SECURITY STILL CALLS POR REPLACEMENT EQUIP. HQS HAS RECEIVED NO WORD ON PROPOSED LIENVOY ~~ MOVE SINCE AUGUST 1962. 4. SO THAT HOS CAN AGAIN REVIEW REQUEST FUR LIENVOY EQUIP LS SUBMIT SOONEST PROJ ON LITEMPO TAP UNIT AND MORE DETAILS OF PROPOSED LIENVOY MOVE. CANNOT JUSTIFY REPLACING EQUIP IF SITE NOT TO BE CHANGED, AND PREFER WAIT UNTIL FISCAL 64, Ot W4 COORDINATING OFFICERS RELEASING OFFICER - ro GROUP E . “ Mette AUTHENTICATING 4 Crp decker. hretoe OFFICER ' . REFRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No. _.: