e John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC ZIUT Hote}. AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY: FBI RECORD _ NUMBER: — 124-10271-10057 RECORD _ SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 62-116464-58 DOCUMENT INFORMATION — ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: —PAPICH, SAM TO: DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE: DATE: 03/13/1970 PAGES: 7 SUBJECT: LIAISON WITH CIA, INSTR, GRIEVANCES, ACT, CASTRO MATTERS, LHO, POST-RP, TRA, ALLEGED $6500 PAYMENT DOCUMENT_TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT ORIGINAL Secret NEW CLASSIFICATION: CLASSIFICATION: REVIEW DATE: — 11/03/1998 UPDATE DATE: 02/14/2001 “STATUS _ Redact oo a a - RESTRICTIONS: JFK Act 6 (1)(B) COMMENTS: ~ INC LIST, MEMO, 256 OF 263 NAR Docld: 327198716 Page 1
Released under the John F. Kenpedy Aepagsination Records Collect {on Bele, 1992 (4d USC 2 DATE: 11-14-2017 Docld: 327198716 Page 2?
“ Released unde) the ohn Fy sReape dy, Aseqegination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Hote}; . DATE: reunta -2017 7, Memoranae OME E “ ° : The. Director DATE: 3/13/70 tOM =: SA Sam seep GIA HAS NO ORECTECH IBJECT, af RELATIONS WITH CIA. ne gee iu wilvi. eo “aie: ~ Reference is made to my letters ates ae n7 and March 5, 1970/ In my letter of March 5, 1970, I stated "it is import tant to emphasize that, the Bureau can also produce ‘ an extensive list of justified. grievances.” It is my under- standing that the Director desired that’ this list be identified, Enclosed herewith is a list of approxinately 75 items, This list should not be considered absolutely complete Preparation was predicated on my personal recollection and a review of Bureau records. To make this list more complete ane _ specifically accurate would necessitate the review of thousands a HH ASA ~ mh O2 24105, The oncleced list can he ‘sunnartead hy Rureau recoras. ao la all aad aw +n 2 What OIA SESS SSS aveacve wise wees Game ae BG 25 GURU W ie Tni Is also must be kept in mind in connection. with our-evaluation of the alleged CIA grievances which I previously listed, -I realize that it is presumptuous on my part, but - if the Director feels that our Bureau work can benefit by a personal discussion between the Director and myself, I am available until April 3, 1970.° I plan t6 leave the area Gg immediately thereafter for an extended period,. nN - ; | -ACTION:~ | gps a “——.s For information. lila clascifed by & 2p /ant oe b ” me ee Becleciiy ag: FAD Enclosure PMs jooverntcey, NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION ore ney Unauthorized Disclosure ibis. 4 . , Subject to Criminal Sanctions Docld: 327198716 Page 3
Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC Zi0T Hotey. DATE: ° 11-14-2017 ' “ os . | . | at LIST OF BUREAU GRIEVANCES L e © ' . . \ : “4. ATTACKS AGAINST: BUREAU PLACE | . 1952) ; Although Agent Papich did not begin handling Liaison : ‘with CIA until 1952, it is important to refger to highly signi- . ficant differences with CIA which culminated in a serious conflict in the Fall of 1951. Our Legal Attaches in PAACE and peace reported that CIA representatives were attacking the Bureau, were endeavoring to place us in an unfavorable: light, were questioning our jurisdiction, and were making disparaging remarks concerning the Bureau. Some of this was summed up by characterizing it as covert ‘hostility within CIA, stemming largely from disgruntled former employees of the FBI. In October, 1951, General Walter bedafi Smith, then Director of CIA, asked to meet with the Director and other Bureau representatives for the purpose of discussing the CH ee eri tcee need General Smith denied that there was any t hoetilitey scgratinst the Bureau and maintained that there was. a “genéral feeling of respect for us. He admitted that there had been isolated instances of fritctiun fur wuach CIA . must accept its share of responsibility. © a It is my recollection that the Director and other . Bureau officials did meet with General Smith, at which time guidelines were set forth for maintaining future relations between the two agencies. I was not able to find a memorandun of record covering this meeting. 2. PROSELYTING OF BUREAU PERSONNEL BY CIA | . . The Agent clearly recalls that early in the 1950's fe encountered difficulties with CIA because the Agency allegedly was recruiting Bureau-employed personnel. We vigorously pro- tested,and subseauently the Agency advised that it would follow &® policy of not having any contact with a Bureau employee until the individual had been separated from the Bureau for a period of at least thirty days. The Agent could not locate the back-. ground of this matter in the files reviewed by him. It is pos- sible that the pertinent information lies in the personnel file of some former Bureau Agent. . \ | oe a cerpeeenene HEENT 7 | a NAHONAT: “ShCURI TY rohit . \ : 7 . peters & 2 nauthorized Disclosure: Bo < oti of ubject to Criminal Sinctions . . . ° ( | ° © . e Docld:32198716 Page 4
i Released under the John F.-K i i 71i07 Hote; I ; . Kennedy Assassinatitn KFecerds Coll on PeORTEY 1121402007 on" Reces ection Acf of 1992 (44 USC: otey. | —_ 7 . con ‘ ‘ . : —— “* possible hostage situation in his native countr OSS y. The Bureau _ was following this potential defection and pursuant to estab- lished procedures was keeping interested agencies apprised of developments. On September 15, 1958, we received information pndscat ing that another Government agency was conducting an nvestigation of the subject. It was later establi ' CIA was the other agency. ’ *Shed nat t , . } ; : . oe The Legal Attache, PAACE reported b lett ‘ September 22, 1958,° that MAHE Amd Pos it/oU er dated — ~ i . ; . . Was a paid, highly. regarded iti 7 Y paid, ghly garde » and very sensitive source ‘| of CLAYS )This inforng sion wes given to the Legal Attache by "According to MAME \ CIA did not want this information to be -krown to other agencies \ particularly the FBI. The Director's notation was, “Some more of CIA double dealing. H." ; , . 40. ALLEGED CIA INCOMPHITENCE ; During the period October PA7& - , Bureau representatives attended a seminar at Orlando, Florida, which was given by the U.S. Air Force. Among the activities was a - Yecture given by © WAHE of CIA. Subsequent to the briefing, General NAME of.the Air Force confided to \ Bureau representatives and expressed his displeasure with the i briefing given by MAME |. He was particularly critical of WAHE reluctance to furnish certain information, using the oy a excuse that. the matter was of a "Top Secret” nature. General f -VPAME stated that the position taken by “A4A4E was only an © 7 excuse for incompetence on the part of Cli. © coe G This item is being cited in the event we desire to _wse the foregoing as evidence to support 2 position that we were =: obliged to be circumspect in dealing with CIA. _ . - ° o H ° 41, CIA COVERAGE IN CUBA PRIOR TO OVERTEROW OF, BATISTA GOVERNMENT The overthrow of the Batista Government on January l, . 1959, and the subsequent assumption of pover by Castro raised . questions concerning the efficiency and competence of U.S. intel- ligence. Allen Dulles indicated that future developments would , . or ee t . e @e @ i. = 14 - . ; Docld: 327198716 Page 5