IB 
Union Calendar No. 8 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 368 
[Report No. 112–17, Part I] 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and improve certain provi-
sions relating to the removal of litigation against Federal officers or 
agencies to Federal courts, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 20, 2011 
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subse-
quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011 
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011 
Committee on the Budget discharged; committed to the Committee of the 
Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and im-
prove certain provisions relating to the removal of litiga-
tion against Federal officers or agencies to Federal 
courts, and for other purposes. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removal Clarification 
Act of 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LITIGATION TO FEDERAL 
COURTS. 
(a) CLARIFICATION
OF INCLUSION
OF CERTAIN 
TYPES
OF PROCEEDINGS.—Section 1442 of title 28, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘that is’’ after ‘‘or crimi-
nal prosecution’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘and that is’’ after ‘‘in a 
State court’’; and 
(C) by inserting ‘‘or directed to’’ after 
‘‘against’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(c) As used in subsection (a), the terms ‘civil action’ 
and ‘criminal prosecution’ include any proceeding (wheth-
er or not ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent 
that in such proceeding a judicial order, including a sub-
poena for testimony or documents, is sought or issued. If 
removal is sought for a proceeding described in the pre-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
vious sentence, and there is no other basis for removal, 
only that proceeding may be removed to the district 
court.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1442(a) 
of title 28, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘capacity for’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘capacity, for or relating to’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘sued’’; and 
(2) in each of paragraphs (3) and (4), by in-
serting ‘‘or relating to’’ after ‘‘for’’. 
(c) APPLICATION OF TIMING REQUIREMENT.—Sec-
tion 1446 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(g) Where the civil action or criminal prosecution 
that is removable under section 1442(a) is a proceeding 
in which a judicial order for testimony or documents is 
sought or issued or sought to be enforced, the 30-day re-
quirement of subsections (b) and (c) is satisfied if the per-
son or entity desiring to remove the proceeding files the 
notice of removal not later than 30 days after receiving, 
through service, notice of any such proceeding.’’. 
(d) REVIEWABILITY ON APPEAL.—Section 1447(d) of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
‘‘1442 or’’ before ‘‘1443’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3. PAYGO COMPLIANCE. 
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 
shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 
titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 
Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 
by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro-
vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 8 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 368 
[Report No. 112–17, Part I] 
A BILL 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify 
and improve certain provisions relating to the re-
moval of litigation against Federal officers or 
agencies to Federal courts, and for other pur-
poses. 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011 
Committee on the Budget discharged; committed to the 
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H368.RH
H368
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS