datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1827 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a standard home 
office deduction. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 11, 2011 
Mr. SCHRADER (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
a standard home office deduction. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Office Deduc-
tion Simplification Act’’. 
SEC. 2. STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR BUSINESS USE OF 
HOME. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 280A of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to disallow-
ance of certain expenses in connection with business use 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:16 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1827.IH
H1827
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
of home, rental of vacation homes, etc.) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(7) STANDARD HOME OFFICE DEDUCTION.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi-
vidual that is allowed a deduction for the use of 
a home office because of a use described in 
paragraphs (1), (2), or (4) of this subsection, 
notwithstanding the limitations of paragraph 
(5), if such individual elects the application of 
this paragraph for the taxable year, such indi-
vidual shall be allowed a deduction equal to the 
standard home office deduction for the taxable 
year in lieu of the deductions otherwise allow-
able under this chapter for such taxable year by 
reason of being attributed to such use. 
‘‘(B) STANDARD
HOME
OFFICE
DEDUC-
TION
AMOUNT.—For purposes of this para-
graph, the standard home office deduction is 
the lesser of— 
‘‘(i) $1,500, or 
‘‘(ii) the gross income derived from 
the individual’s trade or business for which 
such use occurs. 
‘‘(C) INFLATION
ADJUSTMENT.—In the 
case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:16 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1827.IH
H1827
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
year after 2012, the dollar amount in subpara-
graph (B)(i) shall be increased by an amount 
equal to— 
‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de-
termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal-
endar year in which the taxable year be-
gins, determined by substituting ‘2011’ for 
‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 
Any increase determined under the preceding 
sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul-
tiple of $100.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:16 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1827.IH
H1827
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and in 
Louisiana’’ and inserting ‘‘, the State of Lou-
isiana, and other coastal States’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in 
Maryland and Louisiana on Federal, State, and 
private land’’ and inserting ‘‘on Federal, State, 
and private land in the States of Maryland and 
Louisiana and in other coastal States’’; and 
(C) by striking paragraphs (3) and (4) and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(3) This Act authorizes the Maryland Nutria 
Project, which has successfully eradicated nutria 
from more than 130,000 acres of Chesapeake Bay 
wetlands in the State of Maryland and facilitated 
the creation of voluntary, public-private partnerships 
and more than 406 cooperative landowner agree-
ments. 
‘‘(4) This Act and the Coastal Wetlands Plan-
ning, Protection, and Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 
3951 et seq.) authorize the Coastwide Nutria Con-
trol Program, which has reduced nutria-impacted 
wetland acres in the State of Louisiana from 80,000 
acres to 23,141 acres. 
‘‘(5) The proven techniques developed under 
this Act that are eradicating nutria in the State of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:16 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1829.IH
H1829
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(c) RELATIONSHIP TO INTERNATIONAL LAW.—Any
action taken pursuant to this Act shall be consistent with
relevant international law. Any action taken pursuant to
this Act that relates to the waters under the jurisdiction
of a foreign country shall be undertaken only in coopera-
tion with representatives of the affected foreign country.
SEC. 404. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such
sums as may be necessary to carry out titles II and III
of this Act. The amounts authorized to be appropriated
and made available under this section shall be used to sup-
plement and not supplant other funds made available to
the Environmental Protection Agency and shall remain
available until expended.
Æ
HR 1566 SC——2
the period of 30 days beginning with the day on which 
this Act is enacted. 
(e) VACANCIES.—If a vacancy occurs in the member-
ship of the Commission it shall be filled in the manner 
in which the original appointment was made. 
(f) CHAIRPERSON; VICE CHAIRPERSON.— 
(1) CHAIRPERSON.—The member appointed 
under subsection (a)(1) shall be the chairperson of 
the Commission (referred to in this Act as the 
‘‘chairperson’’). 
(2) VICE
CHAIRPERSON.—The member ap-
pointed under subsection (a)(2) shall be the vice 
chairperson of the Commission (referred to in this 
Act as the ‘‘vice chairperson’’). 
(g) PROCEEDINGS.— 
(1) MEETINGS.—The Commission shall meet at 
the call of the chairperson or a majority of its mem-
bers. The Commission shall hold its meetings in 
public to the extent that the Commission considers 
it appropriate to do so. 
(2) QUORUM.—Six members of the Commission 
shall constitute a quorum. 
(3) VACANCIES
NOT
TO
AFFECT
DUTIES
OR 
POWERS.—A vacancy in the membership of the 
Commission does not affect its duties or powers. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:55 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H182.IH
H182
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1567
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt
interest shall not be taken into account in determining the portion
of social security benefits subject to income taxation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 31, 1993
Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that tax-exempt interest shall not be taken into account
in determining the portion of social security benefits
subject to income taxation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) paragraph (2) of section 86(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining modified adjusted gross
income) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) MODIFIED
ADJUSTED
GROSS
INCOME.—
For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘modified
adjusted gross income’ means adjusted gross income
determined without regard to this section and sec-
tions 135, 911, 931, and 933.’’
(b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.
Æ
SEC. 4. DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall— 
(1) investigate and make findings on the— 
(A) the number of jobs saved or created as 
a result of the American Recovery and Rein-
vestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5; 123 
Stat. 125); 
(B) the circumstances in which such jobs 
have been saved or created; and 
(C) the effectiveness of measures taken to 
prevent the improper payment of funds allo-
cated under the American Recovery and Rein-
vestment Act of 2009; and 
(2) make recommendations on— 
(A) changes that could be made to the 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
2009 to save or create more jobs; and 
(B) steps that could be taken to prevent 
the improper payment of funds allocated under 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 
of 2009. 
(b) RELATIONSHIP TO THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT-
ABILITY OFFICE.—When the Commission is investigating 
matters and making findings under subsection (a)(1), and 
when it is making recommendations under subsection 
(a)(2), the following requirements shall apply: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:55 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H182.IH
H182
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 156
To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide that, under
the national flood insurance program, payment for a flood insurance
claim for substantial damage incurred by a structure shall include
amounts for 75 percent of the costs of elevating the structure to the
height necessary to comply with the requirements for continued flood
insurance coverage.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1993
Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, and Ms. MEEK) introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and
Finance
A BILL
To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to
provide that, under the national flood insurance program,
payment for a flood insurance claim for substantial dam-
age incurred by a structure shall include amounts for
75 percent of the costs of elevating the structure to
the height necessary to comply with the requirements
for continued flood insurance coverage.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Elevation Reim-
bursement Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF COSTS OF ELEVATING STRUCTURES.
Section 1306 of the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968 (42 U.S.C. 4013) is amended by adding at the end
the following new subsection:
‘‘(d) COVERAGE OF ELEVATION COSTS.—Pursuant
to an approved claim in accordance with the regulations
issued to carry out this title, if any structure covered by
a contract for flood insurance incurs damage or loss aris-
ing from any flood that is equal to or exceeds 50 percent
of the value of the structure before such damage or loss,
the payment under the flood insurance contract for such
claim shall include, to the extent of the coverage under
such contract, amounts for the costs of elevating such
structure to the height necessary for the structure to be
eligible for a new contract for flood insurance under this
title, except that in no case may such amounts exceed 75
percent of such costs.’’.
SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section
2 shall apply to any damage or loss incurred on or after
August 24, 1992.
(b) RETROACTIVE PAYMENTS.—The Director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency shall provide for
making any additional payments required by such amend-
ment under any claims for such damage that were ap-
proved before the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1830 
To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and milk products 
that are packaged for direct human consumption. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 11, 2011 
Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and 
milk products that are packaged for direct human con-
sumption. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. INTERSTATE TRAFFIC OF UNPASTEURIZED 
MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS. 
(a) SALE ALLOWED.—Notwithstanding the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), 
section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
264), and any regulations or other guidance issued under 
such Act or section, a Federal department, agency, or 
court may not take any action (such as administrative, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:56 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1830.IH
H1830
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
civil, criminal, or other actions) that would prohibit, inter-
fere with, regulate, or otherwise restrict the interstate 
traffic of milk, or a milk product, that is unpasteurized 
and packaged for direct human consumption, if such re-
striction is based on the determination that, solely because 
such milk or milk product is unpasteurized, such milk or 
milk product is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise in 
violation of Federal law. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
(1) The terms ‘‘interstate traffic’’, ‘‘milk’’, and 
‘‘milk product’’ have the meanings given those terms 
in section 1240.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regu-
lations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 
Act). 
(2) The term ‘‘packaged for direct human con-
sumption’’ means milk and milk products that are 
packaged for the final consumer and intended for 
human consumption. Such term does not include 
milk and milk products that are packaged for addi-
tional processing, including pasteurization, before 
being consumed by humans. 
(3) The term ‘‘pasteurized’’ means the process 
of heating milk and milk products to the applicable 
temperature specified in the tables contained in sec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:56 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1830.IH
H1830
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
tion 1240.61 of title 21, Code of Federal Regula-
tions (or successor regulations), and held continu-
ously at or above that temperature for at least the 
corresponding specified time in such tables. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:56 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1830.IH
H1830
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1831 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 11, 2011 
Mr. PAUL (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 
COHEN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FARR, Mr. FRANK of Massa-
chusetts, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 
MCDERMOTT, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MORAN, Mr. NAD-
LER, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. POLIS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. 
SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. STARK, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. KUCINICH) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the com-
mittee concerned 
A BILL 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude indus-
trial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for 
other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Industrial Hemp 
Farming Act of 2011’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:57 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1831.IH
H1831
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINI-
TION OF MARIHUANA. 
Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 802) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (16)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(16) The’’ and inserting 
‘‘(16)(A) The’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include in-
dustrial hemp.’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(57) The term ‘industrial hemp’ means the 
plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, 
whether 
growing 
or 
not, 
with 
a 
delta-9 
tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 
0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’’. 
SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION. 
Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(i) INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION.—If a per-
son grows or processes Cannabis sativa L. for purposes 
of making industrial hemp in accordance with State law, 
the Cannabis sativa L. shall be deemed to meet the con-
centration limitation under section 102(57).’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:57 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1831.IH
H1831
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(A) by or for the United States or any depart-
ment or agency thereof; or
‘‘(B) by or to the government of a foreign coun-
try.
‘‘(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2)(B), it shall be
unlawful to knowingly export or attempt to export a re-
stricted weapon to a country if the Secretary of State finds
that—
‘‘(A) the government of the country engages in
a consistent pattern of gross violations of inter-
nationally recognized human rights; or
‘‘(B) the country has repeatedly provided sup-
port for international terrorism.’’.
(b) PENALTY.—Section 924(a) of such title, is
amended by adding after the paragraph added by section
2(e)(2)(B) of this Act the following:
‘‘(6) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(t) shall
be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both.’’.
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION AGAINST MANUFACTURE OF A FIRE-
ARM CAPABLE OF ACCEPTING A SILENCER
OR BAYONET WITHOUT ALTERATION.
(a) PROHIBITION.—Section 922 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by adding after the subsections
added by sections 2(a) and 3(a) of this Act the following:
‘‘(1) at the designated post of duty or regular
place of business of the employee or member of the
armed services; or
‘‘(2) at a location within the United States for
an employee or member of the uniformed services
whose post of duty is outside of the United States.
‘‘(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to pro-
hibit any employee or member of the armed services from
requesting or being granted a stay or continuance in any
action in a Federal or State court, including any relief
available under the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act
of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.).
‘‘(d) For purposes of this section, the term ‘agency’
means each agency of the Federal Government, includ-
ing—
‘‘(1) an Executive agency as defined under sec-
tion 105 of title 5, United States Code;
‘‘(2) the Department of Defense with regard to
employees of such department and members of the
armed services;
‘‘(3) the United States Postal Service and Post-
al Rate Commission;
‘‘(4) any agency of the government of the Dis-
trict of Columbia;
the date of the enactment of this subsection with a perma-
nent distinguishing mark selected in accordance with regu-
lations.’’.
SEC. 6. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO FIREARMS
LAWS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18,
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(q)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘(r)’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall take effect if such amendment had been
included in section 2204 of the Crime Control Act of 1990
at the time such section 2204 became law.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1835 
To direct the Architect of the Capitol to fly the flag of a State over the 
Capitol each year on the anniversary of the date of the State’s admission 
to the Union. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 11, 2011 
Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on House Administration 
A BILL 
To direct the Architect of the Capitol to fly the flag of 
a State over the Capitol each year on the anniversary 
of the date of the State’s admission to the Union. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Admission Day 
Recognition Act of 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. FLYING STATE FLAG OVER CAPITOL ON ANNIVER-
SARY OF STATE’S ADMISSION TO UNION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—To honor the anniversary of each 
State’s admission to the Union, the Architect of the Cap-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:56 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1835.IH
H1835
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
itol shall fly the flag of the State over the Capitol each 
year on the anniversary of the date of the State’s admis-
sion to the Union. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Architect of the Capitol 
shall fly the first flag of a State over the Capitol under 
this section on the first December 7 which occurs after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, in honor of the anni-
versary of the admission of Delaware, the first State ad-
mitted to the Union. 
SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 
The Committee on House Administration of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 
and Administration of the Senate may promulgate jointly 
such regulations as may be appropriate to carry out this 
Act, including regulations permitting the Architect of the 
Capitol to honor the District of Columbia, the Common-
wealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the 
United States Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana 
Islands by flying the flag of each such jurisdiction over 
the Capitol each year on an appropriate date for that ju-
risdiction. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:56 May 13, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1835.IH
H1835
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
lowing a final cost allocation by the Secretary of the Inte-
rior upon completion of the construction of the Central 
Valley Project. In the event that the final cost allocation 
indicates that the costs properly assignable to the con-
tractor are greater than what has been paid by the con-
tractor, the contractor shall be obligated to pay the re-
maining allocated costs. The term of such additional re-
payment contract shall be no less than 1 year and no more 
than 10 years, however, mutually agreeable provisions re-
garding the rate of repayment of such amount may be de-
veloped by the parties. In the event that the final cost allo-
cation indicates that the costs properly assignable to the 
contractor are less than what the contractor has paid, the 
Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to 
credit such overpayment as an offset against any out-
standing or future obligation of the contractor. 
(c) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.— 
(1) Notwithstanding any repayment obligation 
under subsection (a)(3)(B) or subsection (b), upon a 
contractor’s compliance with and discharge of the 
obligation of repayment of the construction costs as 
provided in subsection (a)(3)(A), the ownership and 
full-cost pricing limitations of any provision of Fed-
eral reclamation law shall not apply to lands in such 
district.
SEC. 3. HOUSING CREDIT AVAILABLE FOR REHABILITA-
TION OF PUBLIC HOUSING.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 42 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and
special rules) is amended by adding at the end thereof the
following new paragraph:
‘‘(8) SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN LEASES.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—In the case of an
agreement with respect to public housing, if all
of the parties to the agreement characterize
such agreement as a lease and elect to have the
provisions of this paragraph apply with respect
to such agreement, and if the requirements of
subparagraph (B) are met, then, for purposes
of this subtitle—
‘‘(i) such agreement shall be treated
as a lease entered into by the parties (and
any lessor shall be deemed to have entered
into the lease in the course of carrying on
its trade or business), and
‘‘(ii) the lessor shall be treated as the
owner of the property and the lessee shall
be treated as the lessee of the property.
‘‘(B) CERTAIN
REQUIREMENTS
MUST
BE
MET.—The requirements of this subparagraph
are met if—