105
amended 
by 
inserting 
‘‘/Milwaukie’’ 
after 
‘‘Mall’’. 
(B) LOS ANGELES.—
(i) PHASE 1.—Section 3043(b)(13) of 
such Act (119 Stat. 1642) is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘(13) Los Angeles—Exposition LRT (Phase 1).’’. 
(ii) PHASE 2.—Section 3043(c) of such 
Act (119 Stat. 1645) is amended by insert-
ing after paragraph (104) the following: 
‘‘(104A) Los Angeles—Exposition LRT (Phase 
2).’’. 
(C) SAN
DIEGO.—Section 3043(c)(105) of 
such Act (119 Stat. 1645) is amended by striking 
‘‘LOSSAN Del Mar-San Diego—Rail Corridor 
Improvements’’ and inserting ‘‘LOSSAN Rail 
Corridor Improvements’’. 
(D) SAN DIEGO.—Section 3043(c)(217) of 
such Act (119 Stat. 1648) is amended by striking 
‘‘San Diego’’ and inserting ‘‘San Diego Tran-
sit’’. 
(E) SACRAMENTO.—Section 3043(c)(204) of 
such Act (119 Stat. 647) is amended by striking 
‘‘Downtown’’.
106
(F) BOSTON.—Section 3043(d)(6) of such 
Act (119 Stat. 1649) is amended to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(6) 
Boston-Silver 
Line 
Phase 
III, 
$20,000,000.’’. 
(G) PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS.—
Section 3043(e) of such Act (119 Stat. 1651) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION GRANTS.—Projects 
recommended by the Secretary for a project construc-
tion grant agreement under section 5309(e) of title 
49, United States Code, or for funding under section 
5309(m)(2)(A)(i) of such title during fiscal year 2008 
and fiscal year 2009 are authorized for preliminary 
engineering, final design, and construction for fiscal 
years 2007 through 2009 upon the completion of the 
notification process for each such project under sec-
tion 5309(g)(5).’’. 
(H) LOS ANGELES AND SAN GABRIEL VAL-
LEY.—Section 3043 of such Act (119 Stat. 1640) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(k) LOS ANGELES EXTENSION.—In evaluating the 
local share of the project authorized by subsection (c)(104A) 
in the new starts rating process, the Secretary shall give 
consideration to project elements of the project authorized
107
by subsection (b)(13) advanced with 100 percent non-Fed-
eral funds. 
‘‘(l) SAN GABRIEL VALLEY––GOLD LINE FOOTHILL 
EXTENSION PHASE II.—In evaluating the local share of the 
San Gabriel Valley––Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 
II project authorized by subsection (b)(33) in the new starts 
rating process, the Secretary shall give consideration to 
project elements of the San Gabriel Valley––Gold Line Foot-
hill Extension Phase I project advanced with 100 percent 
non-Federal funds.’’. 
(5) SECTION 3044.—
(A) PROJECTS.—The table contained in sec-
tion 3044(a) of such Act (119 Stat. 1652) is 
amended—
(i) in item 25—
(I) by striking ‘‘$217,360’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$167,360’’; and 
(II) by striking ‘‘$225,720’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$175,720’’; 
(ii) in item number 36 by striking the 
project description and inserting ‘‘Los An-
geles County Metropolitan Transportation 
Authority (LACMTA) for bus and bus-re-
lated facilities in the LACMTA’s service 
area’’;
108
(iii) in item number 71 by inserting 
‘‘Metropolitan Bus Authority’’ after ‘‘Puerto 
Rico’’; 
(iv) in item number 84 by striking the 
project description and inserting ‘‘Improve-
ments to the existing Sacramento Inter-
modal Facility (Sacramento Valley Sta-
tion)’’; 
(v) in item number 94 by striking the 
project description and inserting ‘‘Pacific 
Transit, WA Vehicle Replacement’’; 
(vi) in item number 120 by striking 
‘‘Dayton Airport Intermodal Rail Feasi-
bility Study’’ and inserting ‘‘Greater Day-
ton Regional Transit Authority buses and 
bus facilities’’; 
(vii) in item number 152 by inserting 
‘‘Metropolitan Bus Authority’’ after ‘‘Puerto 
Rico’’; 
(viii) in item number 416 by striking 
‘‘Improve marine intermodal’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘Improve marine dry-dock and’’; 
(ix) in item number 457—
(I) by striking ‘‘$65,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$0’’; and