HR 4650 EAS
in whole or in part in a State which is not contiguous with
another State and has an unemployment rate in excess of
the national average rate of unemployment as determined
by the Secretary of Labor shall include a provision requir-
ing the contractor to employ, for the purpose of performing
that portion of the contract in such State that is not contig-
uous with another State, individuals who are residents of
such State and who, in the case of any craft or trade, pos-
sess or would be able to acquire promptly the necessary
skills: Provided, That the Secretary of Defense may waive
the requirements of this section in the interest of national
security.
Ω139æPage 70, line 4, strike out ø$24,565,000¿ and in-
sert: $19,917,000
Ω140æPage 70, line 5, strike out ø$13,105,000¿ and in-
sert: $10,410,000
Ω141æPage 71, strike out lines 16 to 23 and insert:
SEC. 8050. None of the funds available to the Depart-
ment of Defense during fiscal year 1995 may be obligated
for low rate initial production of the ALR–67(V)3 Ad-
vanced Special Receiver (ASR) until 30 days after the con-
gressional defense committees have received the following:
(1) A certification by the Director, Operational
Test and Evaluation, Defense, that, based on the re-
HR 4650 EAS
sults of the joint Developmental Test/Operational Test
flight tests and of the Operational Assessment in-
tended to address the readiness of the ASR for low
rate initial production, ASR is potentially operation-
ally effective and potentially operationally suitable
and ready to enter low rate initial production;
(2) A comprehensive report by the Commander,
Navy Operational Test and Evaluation Force as to
the test objectives and results of the joint Developmen-
tal Test/Operational Test flight tests and of the Oper-
ational Assessment intended to address the readiness
of the ASR for low rate initial production;
(3) A comprehensive report by the Assistant Sec-
retary of the Navy (Research, Development and Ac-
quisition) as to the test objectives and results of the
Developmental Flight Tests and Technical Evalua-
tion, along with her certification that, based on these
results, the ASR is ready to enter low rate initial
production.
Ω142æPage 72, line 5, strike out øand hereafter¿
Ω143æPage 73, strike out all after line 12 over to and
including line 12 on page 74 and insert:
SEC. 8054. (a) Funds appropriated in this Act to fi-
nance activities of Department of Defense (DOD) Federally
Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) may
HR 4650 EAS
not be obligated or expended for a FFRDC if a member
of its Board of Directors or Trustees simultaneously serves
on the Board of Directors or Trustees of a profit-making
company under contract to the Department of Defense un-
less the FFRDC has a DOD approved conflict of interest
policy for its members.
(b) None of the funds appropriated in this Act are
available to establish a new FFRDC, either as a new entity,
or as a separate entity administered by an organization
managing another FFRDC, or as a nonprofit membership
corporation consisting of a consortium of other FFRDCs
and other nonprofit entities.
(c) The Secretary of Defense may not obligate more
than one-half of the funds available for each defense
FFRDC, and more than one-half of the total amount avail-
able for defense FFRDCs, until the Congressional defense
committees receive a copy of the revised and updated DOD
master plan for FFRDCs: Provided, That the master plan
submitted in compliance with this subsection shall contain
annual funding and manpower ceilings for each defense
FFRDC and each subcomponent of a defense FFRDC iden-
tified as separate sub-entity due to the significantly unique
nature of its functions.
(d) LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION.—No employee or
executive officer of a defense FFRDC may be compensated
HR 4650 EAS
at a rate exceeding Executive Schedule Level I by that
FFRDC: Provided, That the restriction contained in this
subsection shall not take effect until July 1, 1995.
(e) LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION.—No member of a
Board of Directors, Trustees, Overseers, Advisory Group,
Special Issues Panel, Visiting Committee, or any similar
entity of a defense FFRDC may be compensated for his or
her services as a member of such entity except under the
same conditions, and to the same extent, as members of the
Defense Science Board: Provided, That a member of any
such entity shall be allowed travel expenses and per diem
as authorized under the Federal Joint Travel Regulations,
when engaged in the performance of membership duties:
Provided further, That the restriction contained in this sub-
section shall not take effect until July 1, 1995.
(f) ELIMINATION OF FEE.—None of the funds available
to the Department of Defense from any source during fiscal
year 1995 may be obligated to pay any fee to a defense
FFRDC.
(g) None of the funds available to the Department of
Defense from any source during fiscal year 1995 may be
used by a defense FFRDC for any purpose which otherwise
is not reimbursable under federal or Department of Defense
acquisition regulations: Provided, That the restriction con-
tained in this subsection shall also apply to cost sharing
HR 4650 EAS
for projects funded by government grants, absorption of con-
tract overruns, and costs necessary to pay the costs of doing
business in advance of reimbursement.
(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of the
amounts available to the Department of Defense during fis-
cal year 1995, not more than $1,300,000,000 may be obli-
gated for financing activities of FFRDCs: Provided, That
the total amount appropriated in title IV of this Act is here-
by reduced by $52,650,000 to reflect the funding ceiling con-
tained in this subsection.
(i) The total amount appropriated to or for the use
of the Department of Defense in title IV of this Act is re-
duced by an additional $62,634,000 to reflect savings from
the decreased use of non-FFRDC consulting services by the
Department of Defense.
(j) The total amount appropriated to or for the use
of the Department of Defense in title IV of this Act is re-
duced by an additional $19,055,000 to reflect savings from
the decreased use of major non-profit federally-funded re-
search institutions and university-affiliated research cen-
ters by the Department of Defense.
Ω144æPage 74, strike out all after line 12 over to and
including line 8 on page 75 and insert:
SEC. 8055. None of the unobligated balances available
in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund during
HR 4650 EAS
the current fiscal year may be obligated or expended to fi-
nance any grant or contract to conduct research, develop-
ment, test and evaluation activities for the development or
production of advanced materials, unless amounts for such
purposes are specifically appropriated in a subsequent ap-
propriations Act.
Ω145æPage 76, strike out all after line 3 over to and
including line 9 on page 77 and insert:
SEC. 8058. None of the funds appropriated by this Act
shall be used for the support of any nonappropriated funds
activity of the Department of Defense that procures malt
beverages and wine with nonappropriated funds for resale
(including such alcoholic beverages sold by the drink) on
a military installation located in the United States unless
such malt beverages and wine are procured within that
State, or in the case of the District of Columbia, within
the District of Columbia, in which the military installation
is located: Provided, That in a case in which the military
installation is located in more than one State, purchases
may be made in any State in which the installation is lo-
cated: Provided further, That such local procurement re-
quirements for malt beverages and wine shall apply to all
alcoholic beverages only for military installations in States
which are not contiguous with another State: Provided fur-
ther, That alcoholic beverages other than wine and malt bev-
HR 4650 EAS
erages, in contiguous States and the District of Columbia
shall be procured from the most competitive source, price
and other factors considered.
Ω146æPage 81, lines 7 and 8, strike out øand thereafter¿
Ω147æPage 81, strike out all after line 23 over to and
including line 8 on page 82 and insert:
SEC. 8064. Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, any statutorily-required analysis of the impact on the
defense technology and industrial base of terminations and
significant reductions of major research and development
programs and procurement programs of the Department of
Defense shall address only those actions recommended by
the Defense Department in its annual budget request and
amendments thereto, supplemental requests, or proposed re-
scissions.
Ω148æPage 83, line 22, strike out ø$329,000,000¿ and
insert: $296,000,000
Ω149æPage 83, line 22, strike out ø$300,000,000¿ and
insert: $270,000,000
Ω150æPage 85, lines 4 and 5, strike out øand thereafter¿
Ω151æPage 85, strike out lines 10 to 14 and insert:
SEC. 8074. Of the funds appropriated or otherwise
made available by this Act, not more than $119,200,000
HR 4650 EAS
shall be available for payment of the operating costs of
NATO Headquarters.
Ω152æPage 85, strike out all after line 14 over to and
including line 2 on page 86 and insert:
SEC. 8075. None of the funds available to the Depart-
ment of the Air Force shall be available to establish or sup-
port any organic depot maintenance support activity for
the B–2 bomber until the Under Secretary of Defense, Ac-
quisition and Technology reviews the existing infrastruc-
ture for the private sector and Air Force Depot support and
maintenance of the B–2 and reports to the Congressional
Defense Committees the most efficient and cost effective uti-
lization of public and private facilities to support the B–
2.
Ω153æPage 86, lines 8 and 9, strike out øand thereafter¿
Ω154æPage 87, line 23, strike out øcountry¿ and insert:
United States
Ω155æPage 88, strike out lines 9 to 25 and insert:
SEC. 8081. In addition to amounts appropriated or
otherwise made available by this Act, $97,000,000 is hereby
appropriated and shall be available for liquidating defi-
ciencies in the amounts specified in the appropriations
‘‘National Guard Personnel, Army, 1992’’, $10,000,000;
HR 4650 EAS
‘‘National Guard Personnel, Army, 1993’’, $75,000,000;
and ‘‘Reserve Personnel, Army, 1993’’, $12,000,000.
Ω156æPage 90, strike out lines 4 to 8 and insert:
SEC. 8086. None of the funds appropriated by this Act
may be used to pay health care providers under the Civilian
Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services
(CHAMPUS) for services determined under the CHAMPUS
Peer Review Organization (PRO) Program to be not medi-
cally or psychologically necessary. The Secretary of Defense
may by regulation adopt any quality and utilization review
requirements and procedures in effect for the Peer Review
Organization Program under title XVIII of the Social Secu-
rity Act (Medicare) that the Secretary determines necessary,
and may adapt the Medicare requirements and procedures
to the circumstances of the CHAMPUS PRO Program as
the Secretary determines appropriate.
Ω157æPage 91, strike out lines 11 to 19 and insert:
SEC. 8090. Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, funds appropriated in this Act for the upgrade, pur-
chase, or modernization of supercomputing capability and
capacity under the High Performance Computing Mod-
ernization program shall only be available for contracts,
contract modifications, or contract options which are
awarded as the result of open competition based upon the
HR 4650 EAS
requirements of the users without regard to the architecture
or design of the supercomputer system.
Ω158æPage 92, strike out lines 17 to 25 and insert:
SEC. 8093. None of the funds appropriated in this Act
may be used to fill the commander’s position at any mili-
tary medical facility with a health care professional unless
the prospective candidate can demonstrate professional ad-
ministrative skills.
Ω159æPage 93, strike out lines 1 to 17 and insert:
SEC. 8094. Of the funds appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Defense (DOD) for Operation and Maintenance,
Defense-Wide, not less than $8,000,000 shall be made avail-
able until expended to the Administration for Native Amer-
icans within 90 days of enactment of this Act: Provided,
That such funds shall be made available only for the mitiga-
tion of environmental impacts, including training and
technical assistance to tribes, related administrative sup-
port, the gathering of information, documenting of environ-
mental damage, and developing a system for prioritization
of mitigation, on Indian lands resulting from Department
of Defense activities: Provided further, That the Department
of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Appropria-
tions of the Senate and House of Representatives by Sep-
tember 30, 1995, a summary report of all environmental
damage that has occurred on Indian land as a result of
HR 4650 EAS
DOD activities, to include, to the extent feasible, a list of
all documents and records known to the Department that
describe the activity or action causing or relating to such
environmental damage.
Ω160æPage 94, line 4, after ‘‘Code’’ insert: : Provided,
That notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds ap-
propriated for the Advanced Research Projects Agency de-
fense reinvestment program element under the heading ‘‘Re-
search, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide’’
shall not be obligated until the Secretary of Defense has en-
sured that the Assistant Secretaries for Research, Develop-
ment, and Acquisition of the separate Military Depart-
ments are full members of the Defense Technology Conver-
sion Council and are fully integrated into the process of
selecting dual-use technology focus areas for such programs
and evaluating proposals for such projects: Provided fur-
ther, That notwithstanding any other provision of law, of
the funds appropriated for defense reinvestment programs
under the heading ‘‘Research, Development, Test and Eval-
uation, Defense-Wide’’, $150,000,000 may only be obligated
for projects selected as a result of a competition held by
the Advanced Research Projects Agency in focus areas se-
lected exclusively by the Assistant Secretaries for Research,
Development, and Acquisition of the separate Military De-
partments: Provided further, That in addition to the re-
HR 4650 EAS
striction contained in the preceding provisos, the competi-
tion in focus areas shall be conducted in accordance with
other unaffected statutory provisions of the Defense Conver-
sion, Reinvestment, and Transition Assistance Amendments
of 1993
Ω161æPage 94, strike out lines 5 to 9 and insert:
SEC. 8097. (a) Not later than April 1, 1995, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the Congressional defense
committees a management plan for the major university-
affiliated research centers which support the Department of
Defense.
(b) The master plan required by the preceding sub-
section shall—
(1) establish annual funding and manpower ceil-
ings for each institution, and a total annual funding
and manpower ceiling;
(2) describe in detail what specific actions are
being taken to increase management of these institu-
tions by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and to
reduce future annual funding; and
(3) explain the contracting arrangement with
each institution, including an evaluation of whether
contracts for future efforts should be competitively
awarded.
HR 4650 EAS
(c) For the purposes of this section, the term ‘‘major’’
shall apply to institutions which receive more than
$2,000,000 annually from the Department of Defense.
Ω162æPage 95, strike out lines 10 to 17 and insert:
(TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
SEC. 8099. Upon enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall make the following transfers of funds: Pro-
vided, That the amounts transferred shall be available for
the same purposes as the appropriations to which trans-
ferred, and for the same time period as the appropriation
from which transferred: Provided further, That the amounts
shall be transferred between the following appropriations in
the amounts specified:
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1986/1990’’:
CG–47 cruiser program, $6,000,000;
LSD–41 
landing 
ship 
dock 
program,
$1,700,000;
T–AGOS ocean surveillance ship program,
$5,000,000;
For craft, outfitting, post delivery, and cost
growth, $2,438,000;
To:
HR 4650 EAS
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1986/90’’:
SSN–688 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$11,719,000;
MSH 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$3,419,000;
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1987/1991’’:
TRIDENT ballistic missile submarine pro-
gram, $650,000;
DDG–51 destroyer program, $633,000;
CG–47 cruiser program, $283,000;
T–AO fleet oiler program, $2,800,000;
AO conversion program, $400,000;
For craft, outfitting, and post delivery,
$5,900,000;
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1988/1992’’:
CG–47 cruiser program, $5,145,000;
Weapons Procurement, Navy, 1993/1995,
$18,069,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1987/1991’’:
HR 4650 EAS
SSN–688 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$18,496,000;
AOE fast combat support ship program,
$15,384,000;
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1988/1992’’:
CG–47 cruiser program, $11,993,000;
LSD–41 cargo variant ship program,
$4,773,000;
LHD–1 amphibious assault ship program,
$7,028,000;
AO conversion program, $1,900,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1988/1992’’:
TRIDENT ballistic missile submarine pro-
gram, $6,035,000;
SSN–688 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$19,659,000;
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1989/1993’’:
LHD–1 amphibious assault ship program,
$3,400,000;
HR 4650 EAS
T–AO fleet oiler program, $3,488,000;
T–AGOS 
surveillance 
ship 
program,
$3,197,000;
AO conversion program, $1,300,000;
Weapons Procurement, Navy, 1993/1995,
$178,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1993/1995,
$22,400,000;
Research, Development, Test and Evalua-
tion, Navy, 1994/1995, $41,700,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1989/1993’’:
SSN–688 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$18,939,000;
SSN–21 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$37,123,000;
MHC 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$1,700,000;
AOE 
combat 
support 
ship 
program,
$17,901,000;
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1990/1994’’:
HR 4650 EAS
TRIDENT ballistic submarine program,
$2,400,000;
Aircraft carrier service life extension pro-
gram, $346,000;
MCM 
mine 
countermeasures 
program,
$657,000;
Oceanographic ship program, $3,964,000;
LCAC landing craft air cushion program,
$1,188,000;
Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 1993/1995,
$6,000,000;
Weapons Procurement, Navy, 1993/1995,
$6,753,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1994/1996,
$1,297,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1990/1994’’:
SSN–688 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$9,046,000;
MHC 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$3,575,000;
AOE 
combat 
support 
ship 
program,
$9,984,000;
From:
HR 4650 EAS
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1991/1995’’:
TRIDENT ballistic missile submarine pro-
gram, $39,500,000;
DDG–51 destroyer program, $8,200,000;
LSD–41 dock landing ship cargo variant
ship program, $22,427,000;
Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 1994/1996,
$17,000,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1994/1996,
$666,000;
Procurement, Marine Corps, 1993/1995,
$6,600,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1991/1995’’:
SSN–21 
attack 
submarine 
program,
$48,240,000;
LHD–1 amphibious assault ship program,
$43,600,000;
MHC 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$2,553,000;
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1992/1996’’:
HR 4650 EAS
For craft, outfitting, post delivery, and
DBOF transfer, $5,183,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1994/1996,
$29,261,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1992/1996’’:
DDG–51 destroyer program, $22,958,000;
MHC 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$11,486,000;
From:
Weapons 
Procurement 
Navy, 
1993/1995,
$30,000,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1994/1996,
$38,438,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1993/1997’’:
DDG–51 destroyer program, $26,894,000;
LSD–41 cargo variant ship program,
$5,663,000;
MHC 
coastal 
mine 
hunter 
program,
$7,615,000;
AOE 
combat 
support 
ship 
program,
$28,266,000;
HR 4650 EAS
From:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1994/1998’’:
For craft, outfitting, post delivery, and first
destination transportation, $5,000,000;
Weapons Procurement, Navy, 1994/1996,
$14,000,000;
Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1994/1996,
$435,000;
To:
Under the heading, ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conver-
sion, Navy, 1994/1998’’:
LHD–1 amphibious assault ship program,
$15,131,000;
Oceanographic ship program, $4,304,000.
Ω163æPage 95, strike out all after line 23 over to and
including line 6 on page 96 and insert:
SEC. 8101. None of the funds provided in this Act may
be obligated to initiate a program, or project, or award a
new contract to modify or upgrade the B–1, B–2, or B–
52 aircraft until the Secretary of Defense has submitted a
cost and operational effectiveness analysis for Air Force
bomber programs to the Committees on Appropriations and
Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives:
HR 4650 EAS
Provided, That this section shall not apply to safety of flight
modifications.
Ω164æPage 96, strike out all after line 12 over to and
including line 18 on page 98 and insert:
SEC. 8103. None of the funds available to the Depart-
ment of Defense during fiscal year 1995 may be obligated
or expended to reimburse States which are parties to the
Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and
Shorter-Range Missiles concluded on December 8, 1987, and
the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic
Offensive Arms, concluded July 31, 1991, for costs allocated
to such States by either of those treaties where such costs
are incurred in support of inspections conducted by the
United States: Provided, That the limitation in this section
shall not apply if the Senate of the United States gives its
advice and consent to the ratification of an amendment to
those treaties which changes the financial obligations of the
parties to those treaties with respect to inspection costs.
Ω165æPage 98, strike out all after line 18 over to and
including line 10 on page 99 and insert:
SEC. 8104. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that
all applicable DOD regulations and component command,
installation, or agency policies and procedures governing
temporary duty travel on official military business to the
States of Hawaii and Alaska require no higher levels of ap-
HR 4650 EAS
proval or stricter controls than travel within the continental
United States.
Ω166æPage 99, strike out lines 11 to 16 and insert:
SEC. 8105. None of the funds available to the Depart-
ment of Defense may be used to support the relocation of
P–3 aircraft squadrons or other aircraft or units from the
Naval Air Station at Barbers Point, Hawaii unless such
relocation was specifically stated in the 1993 Report to the
President of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Commission.
Ω167æPage 99, strike out all after line 16 over to and
including line 9 on page 100 and insert:
SEC. 8106. In the case of members who separate from
active duty or full-time National Guard duty in a military
department pursuant to a Special Separation Benefits pro-
gram (10 U.S.C. Sec. 1174a) or a Voluntary Separation
Incentive program (10 U.S.C. Sec. 1175) at any time after
the enactment of this Act, the separation payments paid
such members who are also paid any bonus provided for
in chapter 5, title 37, United States Code, during the same
years in which they separate shall be reduced (but in no
event to an amount less than zero) by an amount equal
to any such bonus: Provided, That any future bonus pay-
ments to which such members would otherwise be entitled
are rescinded: Provided further, That this measure will not
HR 4650 EAS
apply to members who separate during the last year of a
bonus paid pursuant to chapter 5, title 37, United States
Code: Provided further, That civilian employees of the De-
partment of Defense are prohibited from receiving vol-
untary separation payments if such employees are rehired
by any agency of the Federal Government within one hun-
dred and eighty days of separating from the Department
of Defense: Provided further, That members who separate
from active duty or full-time National Guard duty in a
military department at any time after the enactment of this
Act, are prohibited from receiving Special Separation Bene-
fits program (10 U.S.C. Sec. 1174a) or Voluntary Separa-
tion Incentive program (10 U.S.C. Sec. 1175) payments if
rehired by the Department of Defense within one hundred
and eighty days of separating from active duty or full-time
National Guard Duty.
Ω168æPage 100, strike out all after line 9 over to and
including line 11 on page 101 and insert:
(TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
SEC. 8107. Within amounts appropriated in this Act,
$5,000,000 shall be made available for pay and allowances
for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Re-
serve Affairs to be available only for support of Civil-Mili-
tary Cooperation program operations, for transfer to appro-
priations available to the Department of Defense for mili-