datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2311
To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965
with respect to the definition of an eligible lender.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 30, 1997
Mr. BOB SCHAFFER (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGAM, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr.
HEFLEY, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. DAN SCHAEFER of Colorado, and Mr.
SKAGGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Commit-
tee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education
Act of 1965 with respect to the definition of an eligible
lender.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act maybe cited as the ‘‘Kid’s Bank Act.’’
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE LENDER.
Section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(d)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended—
(1) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘or’’ after
‘‘1992,’’; and
(2) by striking the semicolon at the end and in-
serting ‘‘, or (III) it is a bank that is a wholly owned
subsidiary of a nonprofit foundation, the foundation
is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under
section 501(a) of such Code, and the bank makes
loans under this part only to undergraduate students
who are age 22 or younger and has a portfolio of
such loans that is not more than $10,000,000;’’.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4711 
To make funds available for Dungeness crab and rock crab emergency disaster 
assistance, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 3, 2016 
Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. FARR, Ms. ESHOO, Mrs. CAPPS, 
and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 
A BILL 
To make funds available for Dungeness crab and rock crab 
emergency disaster assistance, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crab Emergency Dis-
aster Assistance Act of 2016’’. 
SEC. 2. DUNGENESS CRAB AND ROCK CRAB FISHERY FAIL-
URE AND FISHERY RESOURCE DISASTER. 
(a) DISASTER ASSISTANCE.— 
(1) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.—In addition to 
any other funds available for such purpose, there is 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4711.IH
H4711
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
appropriated 
to 
the 
Secretary 
of 
Commerce 
$138,150,000 to make a lump sum payment to the 
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission. 
(2) DISTRIBUTION.—The Commission shall dis-
tribute such amount among fishing communities, In-
dian tribes, small businesses, including fishermen, 
fish processors, and related businesses, individuals, 
and other entities, for assistance for the economic 
and social effects of the commercial fishery failure in 
the Dungeness crab fishery or rock crab fishery de-
termined under section 312(a) of the Magnuson-Ste-
vens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 
U.S.C. 1861a(a)) or the fishery resource disaster in 
either such fishery determined under 308(d) of the 
Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 
4107(d)), to mitigate the economic losses to such 
communities, tribes, businesses, individuals or other 
entities caused by closures or other restrictions on 
the harvesting of Dungeness crab or rock crab. 
(3) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts appropriated by 
this subsection shall remain available for the period 
with respect to which the determination referred to 
in paragraph (2) is made. 
(4) UNUSED
FUNDS.—Any amount appro-
priated by this subsection that is not expended or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4711.IH
H4711
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIA
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 2314
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 24, 1998
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs
AN ACT
To restore Federal Indian services to members of the Kick-
apoo Tribe of Oklahoma residing in Maverick County,
Texas, to provide trust land for the benefit of the Tribe,
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
otherwise obligated for the purpose described in 
paragraph (1) shall be returned to the Treasury of 
the United States. 
(5) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—This subsection shall 
take effect on— 
(A) the date the Secretary of Commerce 
publishes notice of a determination under sec-
tion 312(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 
1861a(a)) that there is a commercial fishery 
failure in the Dungeness crab fishery or rock 
crab fishery; or 
(B) the date the Secretary of Commerce 
publishes notice of a determination under 
308(d) of the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act 
of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 4107(d)) that there is a 
fishery resource disaster in either such fishery. 
(b) RESEARCH.— 
(1) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.—There is ap-
propriated to the Secretary of Commerce— 
(A) $1,000,000 for West Coast domoic 
acid sampling and monitoring; and 
(B) $5,000,000 for competitive grants for 
projects, activities, and research that advance 
the capacity— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4711.IH
H4711
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(i) to predict the occurrence of harm-
ful algal blooms in the offshore waters of 
California, Washington, and Oregon; and 
(ii) to evaluate the toxicity of domoic 
acid bioaccumulation and transmission to 
humans through the food supply. 
(2) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
GRANT
PROGRAM.— 
The Secretary shall establish a grant program with 
amounts appropriated by paragraph (1)(B) not later 
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
(c) LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.— 
The Secretary of Commerce may not use more than 4 per-
cent of the amount appropriated under each of subsections 
(a) and (b) for administrative expenses. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4711.IH
H4711
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2312
To amend section 1584 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that
forcing immigrants into slave labor by withholding immigration docu-
ments, or by threatening to involve immigration authorities, is a violation
of such section.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 30, 1997
Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend section 1584 of title 18, United States Code,
to clarify that forcing immigrants into slave labor by
withholding immigration documents, or by threatening
to involve immigration authorities, is a violation of such
section.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This act may be cited as the ‘‘Immigrant Slave Trade
Punishment Act of 1997’’.
SEC. 2. INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE.
Section 1584 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Whoever’’;
(2) by inserting at the end the following:
‘‘(b) Whoever for pecuniary gain violates subsection
(a) with respect to five or more persons shall be impris-
oned for not less than 20 years or for life.
‘‘(c) For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘involun-
tary servitude’’ includes any circumstance under which
any legal or illegal immigrant is coerced to work through
withholding of the immigrant’s immigration documents, or
through threatening to report an illegal immigrant to the
authorities.’’; and
(3) in the heading by striking ‘‘Sale into involun-
tary’’, and inserting ‘‘Involuntary’’.
SEC. 3. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.
The table of sections for chapter 77 of title 18,
United States Code, is amended in the matter relating to
section 1584 by striking ‘‘Sale into involuntary’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Involuntary’’.
Æ
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4712 
AN ACT 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 
for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative under 
which a person to whom a document is sent under that 
initiative may require that the United States Postal Serv-
ice obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the De-
partment of Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER 
THE SECURE MAIL INITIATIVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security shall provide for an option under 
the Secure Mail Initiative (or any successor program) 
under which a person to whom a document is sent under 
that initiative may require that the United States Postal 
Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document. 
(b) FEE.—The Secretary shall require the payment 
of a fee from a person requiring a signature under sub-
section (a). Such fee may be set at a level that will ensure 
recovery of the full costs of providing all such services. 
Such fee may also be set at a level that will recover any 
additional costs associated with the administration of the 
fees collected. 
SEC. 3. REPORT. 
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub-
mit to Congress a report which includes—
(1) the implementation of the requirements 
under section 2; 
(2) the fee imposed under section 2(b); and 
(3) the number of times during the previous 
year that a person required a signature under sec-
tion 2(a). 
Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 
2016. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2313
To prohibit the construction of any monument, memorial, or other structure
at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial in Arlington, Virginia, and for
other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 30, 1997
Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
To prohibit the construction of any monument, memorial,
or other structure at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial
in Arlington, Virginia, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION
AT IWO JIMA MEMORIAL.
(a) PROHIBITION.—After the enactment of this Act
no person (including any governmental entity) may con-
struct any monument, memorial, or other structure of any
kind (whether above grade or below grade) on the parcel
of Federal land located south of Rosslyn, Virginia, and
north of the Arlington National Cemetery that is bounded
on the west by Meade Street, on the north by Arlington
Boulevard (U.S. Route 50), on the east by Jefferson Davis
Highway (Virginia Route 110), and on the south by Mar-
shall Drive.
(b) CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED PRIOR TO ENACT-
MENT.—Any person (including any governmental entity)
who commenced construction of any monument, memorial,
or other structure prior to the enactment of this Act on
the parcel described in subsection (a) shall immediately
cease such construction upon the enactment of this Act,
and shall, as promptly as practicable after the enactment
of this Act, restore all lands affected by such construction
to their condition prior to the commencement of such con-
struction.
(c) EXISTING
MEMORIALS
AND
STRUCTURES.—
Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) shall apply to the United
States Marine Corps (Iwo Jima) Memorial or to the Neth-
erlands Carillon.
(d) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person may bring a civil
action in the appropriate United States district court
against any person (including the United States) to en-
force the provisions of subsection (a) and (b), and such
court shall have jurisdiction in any such action, without
regard to the citizenship of the parties or the amount in
controversy, to issue such orders as may be necessary to
restrain any violation of the prohibition set forth in sub-
section (a) and to enforce the requirements of subsection
(b).
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4712 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for an option 
under the Secure Mail Initiative under which a person to whom a 
document is sent under that initiative may require that the United 
States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order 
to deliver the document, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 3, 2016 
Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. WOODALL, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. CLARKE of New 
York, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. CUM-
MINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 
Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 
for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative under 
which a person to whom a document is sent under that 
initiative may require that the United States Postal Serv-
ice obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4712.IH
H4712
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the De-
partment of Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER 
THE SECURE MAIL INITIATIVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than one year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security shall provide for an option under 
the Secure Mail Initiative (or any successor program) 
under which a person to whom a document is sent under 
that initiative may require that the United States Postal 
Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document. 
(b) FEE.—The Secretary shall require the payment 
of a fee from a person requiring a signature under the 
option required to be provided under subsection (a), which 
shall be in such an amount as is reasonable to recoup the 
costs of providing such option to such person. 
SEC. 3. REPORT. 
Beginning not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to Congress 
a report which includes— 
(1) for the first report, the implementation of 
the requirements under section 1; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4712.IH
H4712
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(2) the fee imposed under section 1(b); and 
(3) the number of times during the previous 
year that a person required a signature under the 
required to be provided under section 1(a). 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:18 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4712.IH
H4712
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4712 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
AN ACT 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 
for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative under 
which a person to whom a document is sent under that 
initiative may require that the United States Postal Serv-
ice obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:09 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4712.RFS
H4712
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 4712 RFS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the De-
partment of Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER 
THE SECURE MAIL INITIATIVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security shall provide for an option under 
the Secure Mail Initiative (or any successor program) 
under which a person to whom a document is sent under 
that initiative may require that the United States Postal 
Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 
deliver the document. 
(b) FEE.—The Secretary shall require the payment 
of a fee from a person requiring a signature under sub-
section (a). Such fee may be set at a level that will ensure 
recovery of the full costs of providing all such services. 
Such fee may also be set at a level that will recover any 
additional costs associated with the administration of the 
fees collected. 
SEC. 3. REPORT. 
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub-
mit to Congress a report which includes— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:09 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4712.RFS
H4712
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 4712 RFS
(1) the implementation of the requirements 
under section 2; 
(2) the fee imposed under section 2(b); and 
(3) the number of times during the previous 
year that a person required a signature under sec-
tion 2(a). 
Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 
2016. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:09 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4712.RFS
H4712
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4713 
To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon in the United 
States, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 3, 2016 
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon 
in the United States, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Genetically Engineered 
Salmon Labeling Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 
It is the purpose of this Act to— 
(1) ensure that consumers in the United States 
can make informed decisions when purchasing salm-
on; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
19:39 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4713.IH
H4713
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(2) authorize an independent scientific review 
of— 
(A) the possible effects of genetically engi-
neered salmon on wild salmon stocks; and 
(B) the Food and Drug Administration’s 
approval of genetically engineered salmon for 
human consumption. 
SEC. 3. MARKET NAME FOR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED 
SALMON. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, for purposes of applying the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the ac-
ceptable market name of any salmon that is genetically 
engineered shall include the words ‘‘Genetically Engi-
neered’’ or ‘‘GE’’ prior to the existing acceptable market 
name. 
(b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, salm-
on is genetically engineered if it has been modified by re-
combinant DNA (rDNA) techniques, including the entire 
lineage of salmon that contain the rDNA modification. 
SEC. 4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW OF CERTAIN SALMON AP-
PROVAL. 
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
ensure that an independent scientific organization con-
ducts a review of the environmental assessment that was 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
19:39 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4713.IH
H4713
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 2314 RFS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kickapoo Tribe of
Oklahoma Federal Indian Services Restoration Act of
1998’’.
SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF FEDERAL INDIAN SERVICES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, the members of the Kickapoo Tribe of Okla-
homa residing in Maverick County, Texas, shall be eligible
for all Federal services and benefits furnished to members
of federally-recognized tribes without regard to the exist-
ence of a reservation for the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
in Maverick County, Texas. In the case of Federal services
available to members of federally-recognized tribes resid-
ing on or near a reservation, the members of the Kickapoo
Tribe of Oklahoma residing in Maverick County, Texas,
shall be deemed to be residing on or near a reservation.
(b) COOPERATION WITH
THE MEXICAN GOVERN-
MENT.—In providing services pursuant to subsection (a),
the Secretary of the Interior (referred to hereafter in this
Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) and the head of each department
and agency shall consult and cooperate with appropriate
officials or agencies of the Mexican Government to the
greatest extent possible to ensure that such services meet
the special tricultural needs of the members of the Kick-
apoo Tribe of Oklahoma residing in Texas. Such consulta-
tion and cooperation may include joint funding agree-
HR 2314 RFS
ments between such agency or department of the United
States and the appropriate agencies and officials of the
Mexican Government.
(c) DISCLAIMER
ON NEW APPROPRIATIONS.—(1)
Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to—
(A) constitute an independent authorization for
the appropriation of funds for benefit of the Kick-
apoo Tribe of Oklahoma; or
(B) result in the diminution of funding to any
other federally recognized Indian tribe.
(2) The Secretary shall, upon request of the Kickapoo
Tribe of Oklahoma and subject to the availability of appro-
priations, provide technical assistance to prevent duplica-
tion of services for members of any federally recognized
tribe in Maverick County, Texas.
SEC. 3. LAND ACQUISITION.
(a) 45 ACRES.—Pursuant to section 5 of the Act of
June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 465), the Secretary may accept
at least 45 acres of land held in fee by the Kickapoo Tribe
of Oklahoma in Maverick County, Texas, to be held in
trust for the benefit of the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma.
(b) ADDITIONAL LAND.—Pursuant to land acquisi-
tion authority under the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C.
461 et seq.), the Secretary may accept in trust for the
benefit of the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma any additional
HR 2314 RFS
land in Maverick County, Texas, acquired by the Kickapoo
Tribe of Oklahoma.
(c) NO LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this
section shall be construed as limiting the authority of the
Secretary under section 5 of the Act of June 18, 1934
(48 Stat. 985).
Passed the House of Representatives September 23,
1998.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.