datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
cent thereto during the KDSM eligibility period and met
the service requirements for the award of that medal pre-
scribed under subsection (c).
‘‘(b) In this section, the term ‘‘KDSM eligibility pe-
riod’’ means the period beginning on July 28, 1954, and
ending on such date after the date of the enactment of
this section as may be determined by the Secretary of De-
fense to be appropriate for terminating eligibility for the
Korea Defense Service Medal.
‘‘(c) The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe
service requirements for eligibility for the Korea Defense
Service Medal. Those requirements shall not be more
stringent than the service requirements for award of the
Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for instances in which
the award of that medal is authorized.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such
chapter is amended by adding at the end the following
new item:
‘‘8754. Korea Defense Service Medal.’’.
(d) AWARD FOR SERVICE BEFORE DATE OF ENACT-
MENT.—The Secretary of the military department con-
cerned shall take appropriate steps to provide in a timely
manner for the issuance of the Korea Defense Service
Medal, upon application therefor, to persons whose eligi-
bility for that medal is by reason of service in the Republic
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1928
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for full payment
rates under Medicare to hospitals for costs of direct graduate medical
education of residents for residency training programs in specialties or
subspecialties which the Secretary of Health and Human Services des-
ignates as critical need specialty or subspecialty training programs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 21, 2001
Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr.
LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.
FROST, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. FILNER, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. RUSH, Mr. BENT-
SEN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois,
and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall with-
in the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide
for full payment rates under Medicare to hospitals for
costs of direct graduate medical education of residents
for residency training programs in specialties or sub-
specialties which the Secretary of Health and Human
Services designates as critical need specialty or sub-
specialty training programs.
IIB
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1937
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs
AN ACT
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in
certain feasibility studies of water resource projects in
the State of Washington.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1929
To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native American
veteran housing loan pilot program, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 21, 2001
Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr.
JEFFERSON, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. CARSON
of Oklahoma, Mr. BACA, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. GEORGE MILLER
of California, Mr. FILNER, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Ms.
PELOSI, and Mr. CONDIT) introduced the following bill; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native
American veteran housing loan pilot program, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet-
erans Home Loan Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUS-
ING LOAN PILOT PROGRAM.
Section 3761(c) of title 38, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘2001’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CERTAIN FEDERAL
MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING.
Section 3762(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code,
is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(1)’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting ‘‘; or’’;
and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) the tribal organization that has jurisdic-
tion over the veteran has entered into a memo-
randum of understanding with any department or
agency of the United States with respect to direct
housing loans to Native Americans that Secretary
determines substantially complies with the require-
ments of subsection (b); and’’.
Æ
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such
Code is amended by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ in sub-
paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.
(2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1)
of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public
Law 98–21) is amended—
(i) by striking ‘‘(A) There’’ and inserting
‘‘There’’;
(ii) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ immediately following
‘‘amounts equivalent to’’; and
(iii) by striking ‘‘, less (ii)’’ and all that
follows and inserting a period.
(B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act
is amended by striking subparagraph (B).
(C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act
is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and by re-
designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).
(D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such
Act is amended in the first sentence by striking
‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2001.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1930
To reauthorize the supplemental grant for population increases in certain
states under the temporary assistance to needy families program for
fiscal year 2002.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2001
Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. SHAW, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs.
THURMAN, and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To reauthorize the supplemental grant for population in-
creases in certain states under the temporary assistance
to needy families program for fiscal year 2002.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF TANF SUPPLEMENTAL
GRANT FOR POPULATION INCREASES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2002.
Section 403(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 603(a)(3)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ‘‘and
2001,’’ and inserting ‘‘2001, and 2002,’’;
(2) in subparagraph (C)(iii), by striking ‘‘and
2001’’ and inserting ‘‘2001, and 2002’’;
(3) in subparagraph (E)—
(A) by striking ‘‘appropriated for’’ and in-
serting ‘‘appropriated—
‘‘(i) for’’;
(B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘;
and’’; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(ii) for fiscal year 2002, such sums
as are necessary for grants under this
paragraph.’’; and
(D) in subparagraph (G), by striking
‘‘2001’’ and inserting ‘‘2002’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1931
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat spaceports like airports
under the exempt facility bond rules.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2001
Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself, Mr. ORTIZ, Mrs. CAPPS, Mrs. MEEK of
Florida, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. SHAW, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.
CALVERT, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. MCINNIS,
and Mrs. THURMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat
spaceports like airports under the exempt facility bond rules.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spaceport Equality
Act’’.
SEC. 2. SPACEPORTS TREATED LIKE AIRPORTS UNDER EX-
EMPT FACILITY BOND RULES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 142(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exempt
facility bonds) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(1) airports and spaceports,’’.
(b) TREATMENT OF GROUND LEASES.—Paragraph
(1) of section 142(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (relating to certain facilities must be governmentally
owned) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
‘‘(C) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
SPACEPORT
GROUND
LEASES.—For purposes of subpara-
graph (A), spaceport property which is located
on land owned by the United States and which
is used by a governmental unit pursuant to a
lease (as defined in section 168(h)(7)) from the
United States shall be treated as owned by such
unit if—
‘‘(i) the lease term (within the mean-
ing of section 168(i)(3)) is at least 15
years, and
‘‘(ii) such unit would be treated as
owning such property if such lease term
were equal to the useful life of such prop-
erty.’’.
HR 1937 RFS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Northwest Fea-
sibility Studies Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may
engage in the following feasibility studies:
(1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasi-
bility Study, to identify ways to meet future domes-
tic and commercial water distribution needs of the
Tulalip Indian Reservation on the Eastern Shore of
Puget Sound, Washington.
(2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water
Supply Feasibility Study, to identify additional rural
water supply sources for the Lower Elwha Indian
Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
(3) The Makah Community Water Source
Project Feasibility Study, to identify ways to meet
the current and future domestic and commercial
water supply and distribution needs of the Makah
Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
(b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS.—The Sec-
retary of the Interior shall make available to the public,
upon request, the results of each feasibility study author-
ized under subsection (a), and shall promptly publish in
(c) DEFINITION OF SPACEPORT.—Section 142 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at
the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(k) SPACEPORT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection
(a)(1), the term ‘spaceport’ means—
‘‘(A) any facility directly related and essen-
tial to servicing spacecraft, enabling spacecraft
to launch or reenter, or transferring passengers
or space cargo to or from spacecraft, but only
if such facility is located at, or in close prox-
imity to, the launch site or reentry site, and
‘‘(B) any other functionally related and
subordinate facility at or adjacent to the launch
site or reentry site at which launch services or
reentry services are provided, including a
launch control center, repair shop, maintenance
or overhaul facility, and rocket assembly facil-
ity.
‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL
TERMS.—For purposes of
paragraph (1)—
‘‘(A) SPACE
CARGO.—The term ‘space
cargo’ includes satellites, scientific experiments,
other property transported into space, and any
other type of payload, whether or not such
property returns from space.
‘‘(B) SPACECRAFT.—The term ‘spacecraft’
means a launch vehicle or a reentry vehicle.
‘‘(C) OTHER TERMS.—The terms ‘launch’,
‘launch site’, ‘launch services’, ‘launch vehicle’,
‘payload’, ‘reenter’, ‘reentry services’, ‘reentry
site’, and ‘reentry vehicle’ shall have the respec-
tive meanings given to such terms by section
70102 of title 49, United States Code (as in ef-
fect on the date of enactment of this sub-
section).’’.
(d) EXCEPTION FROM FEDERALLY GUARANTEED
BOND PROHIBITION.—Paragraph (3) of section 149(b) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exceptions)
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(E) EXCEPTION
FOR
SPACEPORTS.—
Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any exempt fa-
cility bond issued as part of an issue described
in paragraph (1) of section 142(a) to provide a
spaceport in situations where—
‘‘(i) the guarantee of the United
States (or an agency or instrumentality
thereof) is the result of payment of rent,
user fees, or other charges by the United
States (or any agency or instrumentality
thereof), and
‘‘(ii) the payment of the rent, user
fees, or other charges is for, and condi-
tioned upon, the use of the spaceport by
the United States (or any agency or in-
strumentality thereof).’’.
(e) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for
section 142(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is
amended by inserting ‘‘, SPACEPORT,’’ after ‘‘AIRPORT’’.
(f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date
of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
HR 1937 RFS
the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those
results.
Passed the House of Representatives September 10,
2001.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1933
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for nonrecognition
of gain on dispositions of dairy property which is certified by the Sec-
retary of Agriculture as having been the subject of an agreement under
the bovine tuberculosis eradication program, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2001
Mr. BONILLA (for himself, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. REYES, Mr.
SKEEN, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and
Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
for nonrecognition of gain on dispositions of dairy prop-
erty which is certified by the Secretary of Agriculture
as having been the subject of an agreement under the
bovine tuberculosis eradication program, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Sec. 102. Provision of additional funding.
TITLE II—SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
Subtitle A—Environmental Quality Incentives Program
Sec. 201. Implementation of best management practices.
Sec. 202. Time for payments.
Sec. 203. Contract term.
Sec. 204. Federal share of cost-share payments.
Sec. 205. Carry over of unobligated amounts.
Sec. 206. Conservation priority areas and priority issues.
Subtitle B—Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program
Sec. 211. Pilot programs to prevent listing of endangered species and preserve
critical habitats.
Subtitle C—Conservation Reserve Program
Sec. 221. Full enrollment of authorized acreage.
Sec. 222. Additional pilot program.
Sec. 223. Expanded haying and grazing.
Sec. 224. Protection of farm program base.
Subtitle D—Wetlands Reserve Program
Sec. 231. Increase in authorized maximum enrollment.
Sec. 232. Enrollment methods.
Subtitle E—Conservation Technical Assistance
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress concerning conservation technical assistance.
TITLE I—EXTENSION AND ADDI-
TIONAL FUNDING FOR CON-
SERVATION PROGRAMS
SEC. 
101. 
EXTENSION 
OF 
CONSERVATION 
PROGRAMS
THROUGH 2012.
(a) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ACREAGE RE-
SERVE PROGRAM.—Section 1230(a)(1) of the Food Secu-
rity Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3830(a)(1)) is amended by
striking ‘‘2002’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’.
(b) CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.—(1) Sec-
tion 1231 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1934
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify
the depreciable life of printed wiring board and printed wiring assembly
equipment.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2001
Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. DEAL
of Georgia, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. OBERSTAR,
Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. DOO-
LITTLE, Mr. GORDON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. SAM
JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms.
DELAURO, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. COX, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. DOYLE,
Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. EHRLICH, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. HERGER, and
Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accu-
rately codify the depreciable life of printed wiring board
and printed wiring assembly equipment.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Printed Circuit Invest-
ment Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR PRINTED WIRING
BOARD AND PRINTED WIRING ASSEMBLY
EQUIPMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section
168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
to classification of property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’
at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end
of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the
end thereof the following new clause:
‘‘(iv) any printed wiring board or
printed wiring assembly equipment.’’
(b) 3-YEAR CLASS LIFE.—Subparagraph (B) of sec-
tion 168(g)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting after
the item relating to subparagraph (A)(iii) the following
new item:
‘‘(A)(iv) .................................................................................
3’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to equipment placed in service
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
Union Calendar No. 138
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1989
[Report No. 107–227]
A BILL
To reauthorize various fishery conservation
management programs.
OCTOBER 3, 2001
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
and ordered to be printed
of Korea or the waters adjacent thereto before the date
of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1936
To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the oak tree as the
national tree of the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2001
Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. GOSS, and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the
oak tree as the national tree of the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL TREE.
(a) DESIGNATION.—Chapter 3 of title 36, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘§ 305. National tree
‘‘The tree genus Quercus, commonly known as the
oak tree, is the national tree.’’.
(b) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Title 
is
amended—
(1) in the table of contents for part A of sub-
title I, by striking ‘‘, and March’’ and inserting
‘‘March, and Tree’’;
(2) in the chapter head for chapter 3, by strik-
ing ‘‘, AND MARCH’’ and inserting ‘‘MARCH,
AND TREE’’; and
(3) in the table of sections for chapter 3, by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘305. National tree.’’.
Æ
‘‘(B) preplacement preventive services pro-
grams, such as intensive family preservation 
programs, designed to help children at risk of 
foster care placement remain safely with their 
families; 
‘‘(C) service programs designed to provide 
followup care to families to whom a child has 
been returned after a foster care placement; 
‘‘(D) respite care of children to provide 
temporary relief for parents and other care-
givers (including foster parents); 
‘‘(E) services designed to improve par-
enting skills (by helping parents to identify 
where improvement is needed and to obtain as-
sistance in improving those skills) with respect 
to matters such as child development, family 
budgeting, coping with stress, health, and nutri-
tion; and 
‘‘(F) infant safe haven programs to pro-
vide a way for a parent to safely relinquish a 
newborn infant at a safe haven designated pur-
suant to a State law. 
‘‘(4) FAMILY
SUPPORT
SERVICES.—The term 
‘family support services’ means community-based 
services to promote the safety and well-being of chil-
dren and families designed to increase the strength 
and stability of families (including adoptive, foster, 
and extended families), to increase competence in 
parenting, to afford children a safe, stable, and sup-
portive family environment, to strengthen parental 
relationships and promote healthy marriages, and 
otherwise to enhance child development. 
‘‘(5) INDIAN TRIBE.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The term ‘Indian 
tribe’ means—
‘‘(i) any tribe, band, nation, or other 
organized group or community of Indians 
that—
‘‘(I) is recognized as eligible for 
the special programs and services pro-
vided by the United States to Indians 
because of their status as Indians; 
and 
‘‘(II) for which a reservation ex-
ists; and 
‘‘(ii) any organized group of Alaska 
Natives eligible to operate a Federal pro-
gram under Public Law 93–638 or the 
designee of such a group.
‘‘(B) 
RESERVATION.—In 
subparagraph 
(A), the term ‘reservation’ includes Indian res-
ervations, public domain Indian allotments, and 
former Indian reservations in Oklahoma. 
‘‘(6) NON-FEDERAL
FUNDS.—The term ‘non-
Federal funds’ means State funds, or at the option 
of a State, State and local funds. 
‘‘(7) QUALIFIED EXPENDITURES.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 
subparagraph (B), the term ‘qualified expendi-
tures’ means, with respect to a State or Indian 
tribe, any expenditure by the State or tribe, as 
the case may be, that is aimed at achieving the 
purposes of this part. 
‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Such term shall not in-
clude any expenditure under a State or tribal 
program funded under part A. 
‘‘(8) STATE AGENCY.—The term ‘State agency’ 
means the State agency responsible for admin-
istering, or supervising the administration of, the 
State program under this part. 
‘‘(9) TIME-LIMITED
FAMILY
REUNIFICATION 
SERVICES.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The term ‘time-lim-
ited family reunification services’ means the
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Northwest Fea-
sibility Studies Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may
engage in the following feasibility studies:
(1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasi-
bility Study, to identify ways to meet future domes-
tic and commercial water distribution needs of the
Tulalip Indian Reservation on the Eastern Shore of
Puget Sound, Washington.
(2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water
Supply Feasibility Study, to identify additional rural
water supply sources for the Lower Elwha Indian
Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
(3) The Makah Community Water Source
Project Feasibility Study, to identify ways to meet
the current and future domestic and commercial
water supply and distribution needs of the Makah
Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
(b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS.—The Sec-
retary of the Interior shall make available to the public,
upon request, the results of each feasibility study author-
ized under subsection (a), and shall promptly publish in
the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those
results.
Passed the House of Representatives September 10,
2001.
Attest:
Clerk.