IV 
118TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 13 
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 6, 2023 
Mr. WOMACK (for himself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. 
ARRINGTON, Mr. BACON, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. BARR, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. 
BILIRAKIS, Mr. BOST, Mr. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 
BUCSHON, Ms. BUDZINSKI, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CAREY, Mr. CARL, Mr. 
CARSON, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. COLE, Mr. COMER, Mr. 
COSTA, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. CUELLAR, Ms. DAVIDS of 
Kansas, Mr. DAVIDSON, Ms. DE
LA
CRUZ, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. 
DONALDS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. EMMER, Mr. EVANS, Mr. 
EZELL, Mr. FALLON, Mr. FEENSTRA, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. FITZPATRICK, 
Mr. FLOOD, Ms. FOXX, Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, Mr. FRY, 
Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, 
Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. GRAVES of Mis-
souri, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. GUEST, Ms. 
HAGEMAN, Mr. HILL, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. HUIZENGA, 
Mr. HUNT, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. 
JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KEAN of New Jersey, Mr. 
KEATING, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. 
KILMER, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. 
LAMALFA, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LATURNER, Ms. 
LETLOW, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. MACE, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MEUSER, Mr. 
MOOLENAAR, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. MRVAN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. 
NEWHOUSE, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. PHILLIPS, 
Mr. POSEY, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. ROGERS
of Kentucky, Mr. 
ROSENDALE, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Geor-
gia, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. SEWELL, Ms. SHERRILL, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. 
SMITH of Nebraska, Ms. STANSBURY, Mr. STAUBER, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 
TIFFANY, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. VALADAO, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. VEASEY, 
Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. WENSTRUP, 
Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 
and Mr. JACKSON of Texas) submitted the following concurrent resolu-
tion; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:18 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\HC13.IH
HC13
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
•HCON 13 IH 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act. 
Whereas the United States enjoys broadcasting and sound re-
cording industries that are the envy of the world, due to 
the symbiotic relationship that has existed among these 
industries for many decades; 
Whereas, for nearly a century, Congress has rejected re-
peated calls by the recording industry to impose a per-
formance fee on local radio stations for simply playing 
music on the radio and upsetting the mutually beneficial 
relationship between local radio and the recording indus-
try; 
Whereas local radio stations provide free publicity and pro-
motion to the recording industry and performers of music 
in the form of radio air play, interviews with performers, 
introduction of new performers, concert promotions, and 
publicity that promotes the sale of music, concert tickets, 
ring tones, music videos and associated merchandise; 
Whereas Congress found that ‘‘the sale of many sound re-
cordings and the careers of many performers benefited 
considerably from airplay and other promotional activities 
provided by both noncommercial and advertiser-sup-
ported, free over-the-air broadcasting’’; 
Whereas local radio broadcasters provide tens of thousands of 
hours of essential local news and weather information 
during times of national emergencies and natural disas-
ters, as well as public affairs programming, sports, and 
hundreds of millions of dollars of time for public service 
announcements and local fundraising efforts for worthy 
charitable causes, all of which are jeopardized if local 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:18 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC13.IH
HC13
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
•HCON 13 IH 
radio stations are forced to divert revenues to pay for a 
new performance fee; 
Whereas there are many thousands of local radio stations 
that will suffer severe economic hardship if any new per-
formance fee is imposed, as will many other small busi-
nesses that play music including bars, restaurants, retail 
establishments, sports and other entertainment venues, 
shopping centers and transportation facilities; and 
Whereas the hardship that would result from a new perform-
ance fee would hurt American businesses, and ultimately 
the American consumers who rely on local radio for news, 
weather, and entertainment; and such a performance fee 
is not justified when the current system has produced the 
most prolific and innovative broadcasting, music, and 
sound recording industries in the world: Now, therefore, 
be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That Congress should not impose any new 
performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge relating to 
the public performance of sound recordings on a local 
radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over the 
air, or on any business for such public performance of 
sound recordings. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:18 Feb 07, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC13.IH
HC13
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB