H. R. 3979—602 
(B) has provided notification that any element of the 
Tri-Party Agreement or the Consent Decree is at risk of 
being breached; or 
(C) is in dispute resolution with the State regarding 
the Tri-Party Agreement or the Consent Decree. 
(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
(A) The term ‘‘Tri-Party Agreement’’ means the com-
prehensive cleanup and compliance agreement between the 
Secretary, the Administrator of the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, and the State of Washington entered into 
on May 15, 1989. 
(B) The term ‘‘Consent Decree’’ means the legal agree-
ment between the Secretary and the State of Washington 
finalized in 2010. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘MOX facility’’ means the mixed-oxide fuel 
fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South 
Carolina. 
(2) The term ‘‘Plutonium Disposition Agreement’’ means 
the Agreement Concerning the Management and Disposition 
of Plutonium Designated As No Longer Required for Defense 
Purposes and Related Cooperation, signed at Moscow and 
Washington August 29 and September 1, 2000, and entered 
into force July 13, 2011 (TIAS 11–713.1), between the United 
States and the Russian Federation. 
(3) The term ‘‘project support activities’’ means activities 
that support the design, long-lead equipment procurement, and 
site preparation of the MOX facility. 
SEC. 3121. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF 
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY. 
(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office 
of the Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 
4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that fiscal 
year, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended 
until— 
(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters 
required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 4205(f)(2) 
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(f)(2)); 
(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense 
committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives the matters— 
(A) required to be transmitted during 2015 under sec-
tion 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), 
as most recently amended by section 1054 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public 
Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861); and 
(B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy 
is responsible; 
(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 
committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives the report required to be submitted during 2015 
under section 3122(b) of the National Defense Authorization
H. R. 3979—603 
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); 
and 
(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the 
congressional defense committees the detailed report on the 
stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan 
required to be submitted during 2015 under section 4203(b)(2) 
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)). 
(b) OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘Office of the Administrator’’, with respect to accounts 
of the National Nuclear Security Administration, includes any 
account from which funds are derived for ‘‘Federal Salaries and 
Expenses’’. 
SEC. 3122. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 
NONPROLIFERATION ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE UNITED 
STATES AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the United States should carry out nuclear nonprolifera-
tion activities in the Russian Federation only if those activities 
are consistent with and in support of the security interests 
of the United States; and 
(2) in carrying out any such activities after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy should 
focus on only those activities that— 
(A) are in support of the arms control obligations of 
the United States and the Russian Federation; or 
(B) will reduce the threats posed by weapons of mass 
destruction and related materials and technology to the 
United States and countries in the Euro-Atlantic and Eur-
asian regions. 
(b) COMPLETION
OF MATERIAL PROTECTION, CONTROL, AND 
ACCOUNTING ACTIVITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) or 
specifically authorized by Congress, international material 
protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian 
Federation shall be completed not later than fiscal year 2018. 
(2) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not 
apply to international material protection, control, and 
accounting activities in the Russian Federation associated with 
the Agreement Concerning the Management and Disposition 
of Plutonium Designated as No Longer Required for Defense 
Purposes and Related Cooperation, signed at Moscow and 
Washington August 29 and September 1, 2000, and entered 
into force July 13, 2011 (TIAS 11–713.1), between the United 
States and the Russian Federation. 
(c) LIMITATION ON TRANSFER OF MILES TECHNOLOGY.—None 
of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 
made available for fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Secu-
rity Administration may be used for the transfer of Multiple 
Integrated Laser Engagement System technology between the 
United States and the Russian Federation. 
SEC. 3123. IDENTIFICATION OF AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR URANIUM 
TECHNOLOGY SUSTAINMENT IN BUDGET MATERIALS FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2016. 
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall include, in the 
budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support 
of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 (as submitted
H. R. 3979—604 
to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), 
specific identification, as a budgetary line item, of the amounts 
required for uranium technology sustainment in support of the 
nuclear weapons stockpile in a manner that minimizes the use 
of plant-directed research and development funds for full-scale tech-
nology development past a technology readiness level of 5 (as 
defined in Department of Energy Guide 413.3–4A (relating to tech-
nology readiness assessment)). 
Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 
SEC. 3131. ANALYSIS AND REPORT ON W88 ALT 370 PROGRAM HIGH 
EXPLOSIVES OPTIONS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, the Adminis-
trator for Nuclear Security, and the Chairman of the Nuclear 
Weapons Council (established by section 179 of title 10, United 
States Code) shall jointly submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the W88 Alt 370 program that contains 
analyses of the costs, benefits, risks, and feasibility of each of 
the following options: 
(1) Incorporating a refresh of the conventional high explo-
sives of the W88 warhead as part of such program. 
(2) Not incorporating such a refresh as part of such pro-
gram. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include, for each option described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of 
subsection (a), an analysis of the following: 
(1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, including costs 
to both the Navy and the National Nuclear Security Adminis-
tration. 
(2) Potential cost avoidance. 
(3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the capacity 
and throughput of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined 
in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
2501)) of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 
(4) The expected longevity of the W88 warhead. 
(5) Near-term and long-term safety and security risks and 
potential risk-mitigation measures. 
(6) Any other matters the Secretary, the Administrator, 
or the Chairman considers appropriate. 
SEC. 3132. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND SENSE OF CON-
GRESS WITH RESPECT TO PLUTONIUM STRATEGY. 
(a) ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nuclear Secu-
rity shall include, as part of the Administrator’s planned analysis 
of alternatives to support the plutonium strategy of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration, an analysis of using or modifying 
existing facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined 
in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) 
to support that strategy, as part of critical decision 1 in the acquisi-
tion process for the design and construction of modular structures 
associated with operations of the PF–4 facility at Los Alamos 
National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The analysis required by subsection 
(a) shall include an analysis of the following:
H. R. 3979—605 
(1) The costs, benefits, cost savings, risks, and effects of 
using or modifying existing facilities of the nuclear security 
enterprise to support the plutonium strategy of the Administra-
tion. 
(2) Such other matters as the Administrator considers 
appropriate. 
(c) SUBMISSION.—The Administrator shall submit the analysis 
required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense committees 
not later than 30 days after completing the analysis. 
(d) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the requirement to create a modern, responsive plutonium infra-
structure is a national security priority, and that the Administrator 
must fulfill the obligations of the Administrator under section 
3114(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2013 (50 U.S.C. 2535 note), as well as the commitment made 
by the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established 
by section 179 of title 10, United States Code) in the letter of 
the Chairman, dated July 25, 2014, to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, to carry 
out a modular building strategy for plutonium capabilities that— 
(1) meets the requirements for maintaining the nuclear 
weapons stockpile over a 30-year period; 
(2) meets the requirements for implementation of a respon-
sive infrastructure, including meeting plutonium pit production 
requirements; and 
(3) includes plans to construct two modular structures that 
will achieve full operating capability not later than 2027. 
SEC. 3133. PLAN FOR VERIFICATION AND MONITORING OF PROLIFERA-
TION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND FISSILE MATERIAL. 
(a) PLAN.—The President, in consultation with the Secretary 
of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intel-
ligence, shall develop an interagency plan for verification and moni-
toring relating to the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons, 
components of such weapons, and fissile material. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The plan developed under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) An interagency plan and road map for verification and 
monitoring, with respect to policy, operations, and research, 
development, testing, and evaluation, including— 
(A) 
identifying 
requirements 
(including 
funding 
requirements) for such verification and monitoring; and 
(B) identifying and integrating roles, responsibilities, 
and planning for such verification and monitoring. 
(2) An engagement plan for building cooperation and trans-
parency to improve inspections and monitoring. 
(3) A research and development program to— 
(A) improve monitoring, detection, and in-field inspec-
tion and analysis capabilities, including persistent surveil-
lance, remote monitoring, and rapid analysis of large data 
sets, including open-source data; and 
(B) coordinate technical and operational requirements 
early in the process. 
(4) Engagement of relevant departments and agencies of 
the Federal Government and the military departments 
(including the Open Source Center and the United States