293
HR 3 IH1S 
the motor vehicles owned or operated, or 
both, by the individual; and 
‘(iv) the suspension and revocation re-
ferred to under clause (i)(II) may allow an 
individual to operate a motor vehicle, after 
the 45-day period beginning on the date of 
the suspension or revocation, to and from 
employment, school, or an alcohol treat-
ment program if an ignition interlock de-
vice is installed on each of the motor vehi-
cles owned or operated, or both, by the in-
dividual.’; 
(4) in subparagraph (B)—
(A) by striking ‘may include the issuance’ 
and inserting the following: 
‘may include—
‘(i) the issuance’; and 
(B) by striking the period at the end and 
inserting ‘; and’ and the following: 
‘(ii) a program provided by a non-
profit organization for training point of 
sale personnel concerning, at a minimum, 
the following: 
‘(I) the clinical effects of alcohol;
294
HR 3 IH1S 
‘(II) methods of preventing sec-
ond party sales of alcohol; 
‘(III) recognizing signs of intoxi-
cation; 
‘(IV) methods to prevent under-
age drinking; 
‘(V) Federal, State, and local 
laws that are relevant to such per-
sonnel.’; 
(5) by striking subparagraph (F) and inserting 
the following: 
‘(F) OUTREACH PROGRAM.—A judicial and 
prosecutorial education, training, and outreach 
program that provides information on the ap-
propriateness and effectiveness of sentencing 
options.’; and 
(6) by adding at the end the following: 
‘(H) SELF-SUSTAINING
DRUNK
DRIVING 
PREVENTION
PROGRAM.—A 
self-sustaining 
drunk driving prevention program under which 
a significant portion of the fines or surcharges 
collected from individuals apprehended and 
fined for operating a motor vehicle while under 
the influence of alcohol are returned to those 
communities that have comprehensive programs
295
HR 3 IH1S 
for the prevention of such operations of motor 
vehicles. 
‘(I) PROGRAMS FOR EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL 
REHABILITATION.—A program for effective in-
patient and outpatient alcohol rehabilitation 
based on mandatory assessment and appro-
priate treatment for repeat offenders described 
in subparagraph (A)(i)(II).’. 
(c) BASIC GRANT B.—Section 410(b) of title 23, 
United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following: 
‘(2) BASIC GRANT B.—A State shall become eli-
gible for a grant under this paragraph if the State—
‘(A) has an alcohol-related fatality rate per 
100,000,000 vehicle miles traveled of 0.8 or 
more as of the date of the grant, as determined 
by the Secretary using the Fatality Analysis 
Reporting System of the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration; and 
‘(B) establishes, subject to such require-
ments as the Secretary may prescribe, a task 
force to evaluate and recommend changes to the 
State’s drunk driving programs.’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3)—
296
HR 3 IH1S 
(A) by striking ‘25 percent’ and inserting 
‘100 percent’; and 
(B) by striking ‘1997’ and inserting 
‘2003’. 
(d) SUPPLEMENTAL GRANTS.—Section 410(c) of title 
23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘(c) ALLOCATION FOR BASIC GRANTS B.—Not more 
than $20,000,000 per fiscal year of amounts made avail-
able to carry out this section shall be available for making 
grants under subsection (b)(2).’. 
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect on September 30, 2005. 
SEC. 2004. STATE TRAFFIC SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM 
IMPROVEMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 23, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘§ 412. State traffic safety information system im-
provements 
‘(a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—
‘(1) AUTHORITY TO MAKE GRANTS.—Subject to 
the requirements of this section, the Secretary shall 
make grants to States that adopt and implement ef-
fective programs to—
297
HR 3 IH1S 
‘(A) improve the timeliness, accuracy, com-
pleteness, uniformity, integration, and accessi-
bility of the safety data of the State that is 
needed to identify priorities for national, State, 
and local highway and traffic safety programs; 
‘(B) evaluate the effectiveness of efforts to 
make such improvements; 
‘(C) link these State data systems, includ-
ing traffic records, with other data systems 
within the State, such as systems that contain 
medical, roadway, and economic data; and 
‘(D) improve the compatibility and inter-
operability of the data systems of the State 
with national data systems and data systems of 
other States and enhance the ability of the Sec-
retary to observe and analyze national trends in 
crash occurrences, rates, outcomes, and cir-
cumstances. 
‘(2) USE
OF
GRANTS.—A State may use a 
grant received under this section only to implement 
such programs. 
‘(3) MODEL DATA ELEMENTS.—The Secretary, 
in consultation with States and other appropriate 
parties, shall determine the model data elements 
necessary to observe and analyze State and national
298
HR 3 IH1S 
trends in crash occurrences, rates, outcomes, and 
circumstances. In order to become eligible for a 
grant under this section, a State shall certify to the 
Secretary the State’s adoption and use of such 
model data elements. 
‘(4) MAINTENANCE
OF
EFFORT.—No grant 
may be made to a State under this section in any 
fiscal year unless the State enters into such agree-
ments with the Secretary as the Secretary may re-
quire ensuring that the State will maintain its ag-
gregate expenditures from all other sources for high-
way safety data programs at or above the average 
level of such expenditures in the 2 fiscal years pre-
ceding the date of enactment of this section. 
‘(5) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of 
the cost of implementing in a fiscal year a program 
of a State pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not ex-
ceed 80 percent. 
‘(b) FIRST-YEAR GRANTS.—To be eligible for a first-
year grant under this section, a State shall demonstrate 
to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the State has—
‘(1) established a highway safety data and traf-
fic records coordinating committee with a multidisci-
plinary membership that includes, among others, 
managers, collectors, and users of traffic records