datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
appropriate in light of budget, travel, and other con-
straints. 
(b) AMOUNT OF TRAINING.—The Secretary shall en-
sure that each human resources professional of the Vet-
erans Health Administration receives the training de-
scribed in subsection (a)— 
(1) as soon as practicable after being hired by 
the Secretary as a human resource professional; and 
(2) annually thereafter. 
(c) CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall require 
that each human resources professional of the Veterans 
Health Administration, upon the completion of the train-
ing described in subsection (a), certifies that the profes-
sional received the training and understands the informa-
tion provided by the training. 
(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit 
to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate an annual report on the 
training described in subsection (a), including the cost of 
providing such training and the number of human re-
sources professionals who received such training during 
the year covered by the report. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:57 Jun 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5526.IH
H5526
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5522 
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require that 
civil investigative demands be appealed to courts, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2016 
Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Financial Services 
A BILL 
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
to require that civil investigative demands be appealed 
to courts, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMANDS TO BE AP-
PEALED TO COURTS. 
Section 1052 of the Consumer Financial Protection 
Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5562) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)— 
(A) in paragraph (2), by inserting after 
‘‘shall state’’ the following: ‘‘with specificity’’; 
and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5522.IH
H5522
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(14) MEETING REQUIREMENT.—The recipient 
of a civil investigative demand shall meet and confer 
with a Bureau investigator within 30 calendar days 
after receipt of the demand to discuss and attempt 
to resolve all issues regarding compliance with the 
civil investigative demand, unless the Bureau grants 
an extension requested by such recipient.’’; 
(2) in subsection (f)— 
(A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days 
after the service of any civil investigative demand 
upon any person under subsection (c), or at any 
time before the return date specified in the demand, 
whichever period is shorter, or within such period ex-
ceeding 45 days after service or in excess of such re-
turn date as may be prescribed in writing, subse-
quent to service, by any Bureau investigator named 
in the demand, such person may file, in the district 
court of the United States for any judicial district 
in which such person resides, is found, or transacts 
business, a petition for an order modifying or setting 
aside the demand.’’; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5522.IH
H5522
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘at the 
Bureau’’; and 
(3) in subsection (h)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—’’ ; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (2). 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5522.IH
H5522
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 3066
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require 90 days notice before changing
the annual percentage rate of interest applicable on any credit card
account or before changing the index used to determine such rate, and
for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services
A BILL
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require 90 days
notice before changing the annual percentage rate of
interest applicable on any credit card account or before
changing the index used to determine such rate, and
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Card Interest
Rate Change Disclosure Act’’.
HR 3066 IH
SEC. 2. NOTICE REQUIRED.
Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C.
1637) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(h) ADVANCE NOTICE OF INCREASE IN INTEREST
RATE REQUIRED.—In the case of any credit card account
under an open-end consumer credit plan—
‘‘(1) no increase in any annual percentage rate
of interest (other than an increase due solely to a
change in another rate of interest to which such rate
is indexed) applicable to any outstanding balance of
credit under such plan; and
‘‘(2) no change in the index used to determine
any such annual percentage rate of interest,
may take effect before the end of the 90-day period begin-
ning on the date notice of such increase or change in index
is first provided to the consumer.’’.
Æ
‘‘(10) research to improve teaching and learn-
ing by teachers in the professional development
school and faculty at the institution of higher edu-
cation; and
‘‘(11) activities designed to disseminate infor-
mation, regarding the teaching strategies and best
practices implemented by the professional develop-
ment school, to—
‘‘(A) teachers in elementary schools or sec-
ondary schools, which are served by the local
educational agency or located in the State, that
are not associated with the professional develop-
ment partnership; and
‘‘(B) institutions of higher education in the
State.
‘‘(b) CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITED.—No grant funds
provided under this part may be used for the construction,
renovation, or repair of any school or facility.
‘‘SEC. 507. APPLICATIONS.
‘‘Each professional development partnership desiring
a grant under this part shall submit an application to the
Secretary at such time, in such manner, and accompanied
by such information as the Secretary may require. Each
such application shall—
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 3067
To provide that Federal Reserve Banks be covered under the chapter 71
of title 5, United States Code, relating to labor-management relations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
A BILL
To provide that Federal Reserve Banks be covered under
the chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, relating
to labor-management relations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve Labor
Accountability Act’’.
SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS.
Paragraph (3) of section 7103(a) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘a Federal Reserve
Bank,’’ after ‘‘(including’’.
Æ
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advisory Council on
California Indian Policy Extension Act of 1998’’.
SEC. 2. FINDING AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Advisory
Council on California Indian Policy, pursuant to the Advi-
sory Council on California Indian Policy Act of 1992
(Public Law 102–416; 25 U.S.C. 651 note), submitted its
proposals and recommendations regarding remedial meas-
ures to address the special status of California’s termi-
nated and unacknowledged Indian tribes and the needs of
California Indians relating to economic self-sufficiency,
health, and education.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to allow
the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to advise
Congress on the implementation of such proposals and
recommendations.
SEC. 3. DUTIES OF ADVISORY COUNCIL REGARDING IMPLE-
MENTATION 
OF 
PROPOSALS 
AND 
REC-
OMMENDATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Advisory Council
on California Indian Policy Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 2133)
is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6),
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and
inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘SEC. 139F. INTEREST PAID IN ACTION TO RECOVER PROP-
ERTY SEIZED BY THE I.R.S. BASED ON STRUC-
TURING TRANSACTION. 
‘‘Gross income shall not include any interest received 
under section 5317(c)(2) of title 31, United States Code, 
with respect to an action to recover property seized by the 
Internal 
Revenue 
Service 
pursuant 
to 
section 
5317(c)(2)(A) of such title by reason of a claimed violation 
of section 5324 of such title.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
is amended by inserting before the item relating to section 
140 the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 139F. Interest paid in action to recover property seized by the I.R.S. 
based on structuring transaction.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to interest received on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:00 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5523.IH
H5523
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
†
106
HR 4818 EAS
(5) the President and the Secretary of State
should continue to vigorously oppose the Arab League
boycott of Israel and find concrete steps to dem-
onstrate that opposition by, for example, taking into
consideration the participation of any recipient coun-
try in the boycott when determining to sell weapons
to said country; and
(6) the President should report to Congress an-
nually on specific steps being taken by the United
States to encourage Arab League states to normalize
their relations with Israel to bring about the termi-
nation of the Arab League boycott of Israel, including
those to encourage allies and trading partners of the
United States to enact laws prohibiting businesses
from complying with the boycott and penalizing busi-
nesses that do comply.
ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE
SEC. 5036. (a) ASSISTANCE THROUGH NONGOVERN-
MENTAL ORGANIZATIONS.—Restrictions contained in this
or any other Act with respect to assistance for a country
shall not be construed to restrict assistance in support of
programs of nongovernmental organizations from funds ap-
propriated by this Act to carry out the provisions of chap-
ters 1, 10, 11, and 12 of part I and chapter 4 of part II
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, and from funds ap-
propriated under the heading ‘‘Assistance for Eastern Eu-
†
107
HR 4818 EAS
rope and the Baltic States’’: Provided, That before using
the authority of this subsection to furnish assistance in sup-
port of programs of nongovernmental organizations, the
President shall notify the Committees on Appropriations
under the regular notification procedures of those commit-
tees, including a description of the program to be assisted,
the assistance to be provided, and the reasons for furnishing
such assistance: Provided further, That nothing in this sub-
section shall be construed to alter any existing statutory
prohibitions against abortion or involuntary sterilizations
contained in this or any other Act.
(b) PUBLIC LAW 480.—During fiscal year 2005, re-
strictions contained in this or any other Act with respect
to assistance for a country shall not be construed to restrict
assistance under the Agricultural Trade Development and
Assistance Act of 1954: Provided, That none of the funds
appropriated to carry out title I of such Act and made
available pursuant to this subsection may be obligated or
expended except as provided through the regular notifica-
tion procedures of the Committees on Appropriations.
(c) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply—
(1) with respect to section 620A of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 or any comparable provision
of law prohibiting assistance to countries that support
international terrorism; or
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advisory Council on
California Indian Policy Extension Act of 1998’’.
SEC. 2. FINDING AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Advisory
Council on California Indian Policy, pursuant to the Advi-
sory Council on California Indian Policy Act of 1992
(Public Law 102–416; 25 U.S.C. 651 note), submitted its
proposals and recommendations regarding remedial meas-
ures to address the special status of California’s termi-
nated and unacknowledged Indian tribes and the needs of
California Indians relating to economic self-sufficiency,
health, and education.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to allow
the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to advise
Congress on the implementation of such proposals and
recommendations.
SEC. 3. DUTIES OF ADVISORY COUNCIL REGARDING IMPLE-
MENTATION 
OF 
PROPOSALS 
AND 
REC-
OMMENDATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Advisory Council
on California Indian Policy Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 2133)
is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6),
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and
inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(8) work with Congress, the Secretary, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the
California Indian tribes, to implement the Council’s
proposals and recommendations contained in the re-
port submitted made under paragraph (6), includ-
ing—
‘‘(A) consulting with Federal departments
and agencies to identify those recommendations
that can be implemented immediately, or in the
very near future, and those which will require
long-term changes in law, regulations, or policy;
‘‘(B) working with Federal departments
and agencies to expedite to the greatest extent
possible the implementation of the Council’s
recommendations;
‘‘(C) presenting draft legislation to Con-
gress for implementation of the recommenda-
tions requiring legislative changes;
‘‘(D) initiating discussions with the State
of California and its agencies to identify specific
areas where State actions or tribal-State co-
operation can complement actions by the Fed-
eral Government to implement specific rec-
ommendations;
‘‘(E) providing timely information to and
consulting with California Indian tribes on dis-
cussions between the Council and Federal and
State agencies regarding implementation of the
recommendations; and
‘‘(F) providing annual progress reports to
the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate
and the Committee on Resources of the House
of Representatives on the status of the imple-
mentation of the recommendations.’’
(b) TERMINATION.—The first sentence of section 8
of the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy Act
of 1992 (106 Stat. 2136) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘The Council shall cease to exist on March 31, 2000.’’
Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1998.
Attest:
Clerk.
IB 
Union Calendar No. 566 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5523 
[Report No. 114–730, Part I] 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the Internal Revenue 
Service from carrying out seizures relating to a structuring transaction 
unless the property to be seized derived from an illegal source or the 
funds were structured for the purpose of concealing the violation of 
another criminal law or regulation, to require notice and a post-seizure 
hearing for such seizures, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2016 
Mr. ROSKAM (for himself and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addi-
tion to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subse-
quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
SEPTEMBER 9, 2016 
Additional sponsors: Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. HOLDING, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. 
REED, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, 
Mr. RENACCI, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, 
and Mr. HARRIS 
SEPTEMBER 9, 2016 
Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means with an amendment 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
SEPTEMBER 9, 2016 
The Committee on Financial Services discharged; committed to the Committee 
of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 16, 2016] 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:24 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H5523.RH
H5523
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the Inter-
nal Revenue Service from carrying out seizures relating 
to a structuring transaction unless the property to be 
seized derived from an illegal source or the funds were 
structured for the purpose of concealing the violation 
of another criminal law or regulation, to require notice 
and a post-seizure hearing for such seizures, and for 
other purposes. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:24 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H5523.RH
H5523
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
IIA
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3069
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 18, 1998
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs
AN ACT
To extend the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy
to allow the Advisory Council to advise Congress on
the implementation of the proposals and recommenda-
tions of the Advisory Council.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 3069 RFS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advisory Council on
California Indian Policy Extension Act of 1998’’.
SEC. 2. FINDING AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Advisory
Council on California Indian Policy, pursuant to the Advi-
sory Council on California Indian Policy Act of 1992
(Public Law 102–416; 25 U.S.C. 651 note), submitted its
proposals and recommendations regarding remedial meas-
ures to address the special status of California’s termi-
nated and unacknowledged Indian tribes and the needs of
California Indians relating to economic self-sufficiency,
health, and education.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to allow
the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to advise
Congress on the implementation of such proposals and
recommendations.
SEC. 3. DUTIES OF ADVISORY COUNCIL REGARDING IMPLE-
MENTATION 
OF 
PROPOSALS 
AND 
REC-
OMMENDATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Advisory Council
on California Indian Policy Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 2133)
is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6),
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and
inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5524 
To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2016 
Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legal Services Cor-
poration Repeal Act of 2016’’. 
SEC. 2. REPEAL. 
The Legal Services Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 2996 
et seq.) is repealed. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:00 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5524.IH
H5524
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 3069
To extend the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to allow the
Advisory Council to advise Congress on the implementation of the propos-
als and recommendations of the Advisory Council.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
Mr. MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To extend the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy
to allow the Advisory Council to advise Congress on
the implementation of the proposals and recommenda-
tions of the Advisory Council.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advisory Council on
California Indian Policy Extension Act of 1997’’.
SEC. 2. FINDING AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Advisory
Council on California Indian Policy, pursuant to the Advi-
HR 3069 RFS
‘‘(8) work with Congress, the Secretary, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the
California Indian tribes, to implement the Council’s
proposals and recommendations contained in the re-
port submitted made under paragraph (6), includ-
ing—
‘‘(A) consulting with Federal departments
and agencies to identify those recommendations
that can be implemented immediately, or in the
very near future, and those which will require
long-term changes in law, regulations, or policy;
‘‘(B) working with Federal departments
and agencies to expedite to the greatest extent
possible the implementation of the Council’s
recommendations;
‘‘(C) presenting draft legislation to Con-
gress for implementation of the recommenda-
tions requiring legislative changes;
‘‘(D) initiating discussions with the State
of California and its agencies to identify specific
areas where State actions or tribal-State co-
operation can complement actions by the Fed-
eral Government to implement specific rec-
ommendations;