datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(A) the actual damages and any additional 
profits of the violator, as provided in paragraph 
(2); or 
(B) statutory damages, as provided in 
paragraph (3). 
(2) ACTUAL DAMAGES.—The court shall award 
to the complaining party the actual damages suf-
fered by the party as a result of the violation, and 
any profits of the violator that are attributable to 
the violation and are not taken into account in com-
puting the actual damages, if the complaining party 
elects such damages at any time before final judg-
ment is entered. 
(3) STATUTORY DAMAGES.—At any time before 
final judgment is entered, a complaining party may 
elect to recover an award of statutory damages for 
each violation of section 101 in the sum of not less 
than $200 or more than $2,500 per device, product, 
component, offer, or performance of service, as the 
court considers just. 
(4) REPEATED
VIOLATIONS.—In any case in 
which the injured party sustains the burden of prov-
ing, and the court finds, that a person has violated 
section 101 within three years after a final judgment 
was entered against the person for another such vio-
the Food and Drug Administration to Barr Pharma-
ceuticals. 
Æ
V 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4230 
For the relief of Alejandro E. Gonzales. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 
Mr. PASTOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
For the relief of Alejandro E. Gonzales. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, DE-
NIAL OF ADMISSION TO, ALEJANDRO E. 
GONZALES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 
and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Alejandro E. Gonzales may not be removed from the 
United States, or denied admission to the United States, 
by reason of any act of his that is a ground for removal 
or denial of admission and is reflected in the records of 
the Department of Homeland Security, or the Visa Office
of the Department of State, on the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE-
MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall re-
scind any outstanding order of removal, or any finding of 
inadmissibility or deportability, that has been entered 
against Alejandro E. Gonzales by reason of any act de-
scribed in subsection (a). 
(c) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
GOOD
MORAL
CHAR-
ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra-
tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection 
(a) may not be considered in determining whether 
Alejandro E. Gonzales is, or during any period has been, 
a person of good moral character for purposes of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4231 
To ensure that any affordable housing assistance program of Fannie Mae 
or Freddie Mac allows participation by nonprofit organizations that en-
gage in voter registration activities required under State law. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
NOVEMBER 4, 2005 
Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota (for himself and Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota) 
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Fi-
nancial Services 
A BILL 
To ensure that any affordable housing assistance program 
of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac allows participation by 
nonprofit organizations that engage in voter registration 
activities required under State law. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON ELIGIBILITY 
OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGING 
IN VOTER REGISTRATION ACTIVITY MAN-
DATED UNDER STATE LAW. 
To the extent that the Federal National Mortgage 
Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corpora-
tion is required by any provision of any law reforming the 
regulation of such entities, or by any regulation pursuant 
to such a law, to carry out any program under which 
grants or other financial assistance is made available by 
such an entity to nonprofit organizations for carrying out 
affordable housing or public infrastructure development 
activities, any law, regulation, or restriction making a non-
profit organization ineligible for such grants or assistance, 
or limiting such eligibility of a nonprofit organization, 
based on the organization engaging in voter registration 
activities shall not apply with respect to any voter registra-
tion activity of a nonprofit organization to the extent that 
such organization is required under State law to engage 
in such activity. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4232 
To prohibit the use of funds to deploy United States Armed Forces to 
Iraq. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
NOVEMBER 4, 2005 
Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 
PAYNE, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. VELA´ZQUEZ, 
Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. STARK, Ms. WATERS, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. KIL-
PATRICK of Michigan, and Ms. LEE) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the 
Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently de-
termined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To prohibit the use of funds to deploy United States Armed 
Forces to Iraq. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End the War in Iraq 
Act of 2005’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO DEPLOY 
ARMED FORCES TO IRAQ. 
(a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 
(b), funds appropriated or otherwise made available under 
any provision of law may not be obligated or expended to 
deploy or continue to deploy the Armed Forces to the Re-
public of Iraq. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
the use of funds to— 
(1) provide for the safe and orderly withdrawal 
of the Armed Forces from Iraq; or 
(2) ensure the security of Iraq and the transi-
tion to democratic rule by— 
(A) carrying out consultations with the 
Government of Iraq, other foreign governments, 
the 
North 
Atlantic 
Treaty 
Organization 
(NATO), the United Nations, and other inter-
national organizations; or 
(B) providing financial assistance or equip-
ment to Iraqi security forces and international 
forces in Iraq. 
(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec-
tion shall be construed to prohibit or otherwise restrict 
the use of funds available to any department or agency 
of the Government of the United States (other than the
Department of Defense) to carry out social and economic 
reconstruction activities in Iraq. 
(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Armed 
Forces’’ has the meaning given the term in section 
101(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code. 
Æ
cording method on the list certified by the Director 
of the Patent and Trademark Office under section 
202(4), as such list may be amended from time to 
time in accordance with the procedures established 
under section 202(5). 
(4) BOUND
RECODING
METHOD.—The term 
‘‘bound recording method’’ means a method for re-
cording content that effectively and uniquely associ-
ates such recording with a single analog video input 
device (using a cryptographic protocol or other effec-
tive means) so that such recording cannot be 
accessed in usable form by another product (except 
where the content of such recording is passed to an-
other product by an authorized digital output meth-
od). 
(5) COMPUTER
PRODUCT.—The term ‘‘com-
puter product’’ means a device that is designed for 
or permits the end user to install a wide variety of 
commercially available software applications thereon, 
such as a personal computer, handheld ‘‘personal 
digital assistant’’, and similar products, and further 
includes a subsystem of such a product, such as a 
graphics card. 
(6) CONSTRAINED
IMAGE.—The term ‘‘con-
strained image’’ means an image that—
(A) has the visual equivalent of no more 
than— 
(i) 350,000 pixels per frame (e.g. an 
image with resolution of 720 x 480 pixels 
for a 4:3 (non-square pixel) aspect ratio); 
and 
(ii) 30 frames per second; 
(B) may be attained by reducing resolu-
tion, such as by discarding, dithering, or aver-
aging pixels to obtain the specified value; and 
(C) can be displayed using video processing 
techniques such as line doubling or sharpening 
to improve the perceived quality of the image. 
(7) COPY UNLIMITED NO REDISTRIBUTION CON-
TENT.—The term ‘‘copy unlimited no redistribution 
content’’ means, with respect to an analog video 
input device— 
(A) the content of an analog video signal 
received by that device through transmission 
from a source external to that device, or by 
reading of the signal from a prerecorded me-
dium, with a rights signaling system encoding 
indicating ‘‘copy control restrictions not as-
serted but redistribution of the work is intended 
to be limited’’, as defined in Table W; or
(B) the result of combining content with 
any content other than copy one generation 
content or copy prohibited content. 
(8) COPY
ONE
GENERATION
CONTENT.—The 
term ‘‘copy one generation content’’ means, with re-
spect to an analog video input device— 
(A) the content of an analog video signal 
received by that device through transmission 
from a source external to that device, or by 
reading of that signal from a prerecorded me-
dium, with a rights signaling system encoding 
indicating ‘‘one generation of copies may be 
made’’, as defined in Table W; or 
(B) the result of combining content de-
scribed in subparagraph (A) with any content 
other than copy prohibited content. 
(9) COPY
PROHIBITED
CONTENT.—The term 
‘‘copy prohibited content’’ means, with respect to an 
analog video input device— 
(A) the content of an analog video signal 
received by such device through transmission 
from a source external to that device, or by 
reading of such signal from a prerecorded me-
dium with a rights signaling system encoding
indicating ‘‘no copying is permitted’’, as defined 
in Table W; 
(B) content received by that device as copy 
one generation content that has been recorded 
using a bound recording method in accordance 
with section 201(b)(2)(B); or 
(C) the result of combining content de-
scribed in subparagraph (A) or (B) with any 
other content. 
(10) TABLE W.—The term ‘‘Table W’’ means 
the following table: 
TABLE W—Analog Hole Rights Signaling System Detection & 
Content Protection Response 
(Step 1) 
CGMS–A 
State De-
tected 
(Step 2) RCI 
State De-
tected (re-
distribution 
control bit 
to be de-
tected with 
CGMS–A) 
(Step 3) 
VEIL De-
tected 
Rights Assertion 
Description 
Technical 
Content 
Protection 
Response 
1 .....
Not Present 
Not Present 
No 
No copy or redis-
tribution control 
is being asserted 
No Technical 
Protection 
Applied 
2 .....
Not Present 
Not Present 
Yes 
INCON-
SISTENT 
STATE*— 
Rights are being 
asserted so the 
CGMS–A and 
RCI must have 
been stripped.
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content 
3 .....
(0,0) Copy 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
Not Present 
No 
No Copy or redis-
tribution control 
is being asserted 
No Technical 
Protection 
Applied 
4 .....
(0,0) Copy 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
Not Present 
Yes 
INCON-
SISTENT 
STATE*— 
Rights are being 
asserted so the 
CGMS–A was 
probably tam-
pered and/or the 
RCI was prob-
ably stripped.
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content
TABLE W—Analog Hole Rights Signaling System Detection & 
Content Protection Response—Continued 
(Step 1) 
CGMS–A 
State De-
tected 
(Step 2) RCI 
State De-
tected (re-
distribution 
control bit 
to be de-
tected with 
CGMS–A) 
(Step 3) 
VEIL De-
tected 
Rights Assertion 
Description 
Technical 
Content 
Protection 
Response 
5 .....
Not Present 
(0) Redis-
tribution 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
No 
It appears that no 
copy or redis-
tribution control 
is being asserted 
No Technical 
Protection 
Applied 
6 .....
Not Present 
(0) Redis-
tribution 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
Yes 
INCON-
SISTENT 
STATE*— 
Rights are being 
asserted so the 
CGMS–A and/or 
RCI were prob-
ably stripped or 
tampered.
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content 
7 .....
(0,0) Copy 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
(0) Redis-
tribution 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
Yes 
INCON-
SISTENT 
STATE*— 
Rights are being 
asserted so the 
CGMS–A and/or 
RCI were prob-
ably tampered.
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content 
8 .....
(0,0) Copy 
Control 
Not As-
serted 
(1) Redis-
tribution 
Control 
Asserted 
Detection 
Unnec-
essary 
No numeric copy 
control is being 
asserted but re-
distribution con-
trol is being as-
serted 
Protect as 
Copy Un-
limited No 
Redistribu-
tion Con-
tent 
9 .....
Not Present 
(1) Redis-
tribution 
Control 
Asserted 
Detection 
Unnec-
essary 
It appears that no 
numeric copy 
control is being 
asserted but re-
distribution con-
trol is being as-
serted 
Protect as 
Copy Un-
limited No 
Redistribu-
tion Con-
tent 
10 ...
(1,0) Copy 
One Gen-
eration 
Detection 
Unneces-
sary 
Detection 
Unnec-
essary 
Numeric copy con-
trol is being as-
serted and redis-
tribution control 
is implied by 
CGMS–A state 
Protect as 
Copy One 
Generation 
Content 
11 ...
(0,1) Copy 
No More 
Detection 
Unneces-
sary 
Detection 
Unnec-
essary 
Numeric copy con-
trol is being as-
serted and redis-
tribution control 
is implied by 
CGMS–A state 
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content 
12 ...
(1,1) Copy 
Never 
Detection 
Unneces-
sary 
Detection 
Unnec-
essary 
Numeric copy con-
trol is being as-
serted and redis-
tribution control 
is implied by 
CGMS–A state 
VIEW 
ONLY— 
Protect as 
Copy Pro-
hibited 
Content
IB 
Union Calendar No. 413 
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5658 
[Report No. 110–652] 
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2009 for military activities of 
the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths 
for fiscal year 2009, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 31, 2008 
Mr. SKELTON (for himself and Mr. HUNTER) (both by request) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 
MAY 16, 2008 
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 
on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 31, 2008] 
A BILL 
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2009 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe 
military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2009, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:17 May 17, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5658.RH
H5658
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
HR 3221 PCS
‘‘(ii) 
evaluate 
renewable 
energy 
sources such as the use of solar and small 
wind to supplement power consumption; 
‘‘(iii) secure financing to achieve en-
ergy efficiency or to construct green build-
ings; and 
‘‘(iv) empower management to imple-
ment energy efficiency projects; 
‘‘(B) assist entrepreneurs with clean tech-
nology development and technology commer-
cialization through— 
‘‘(i) technology assessment; 
‘‘(ii) intellectual property; 
‘‘(iii) Small Business Innovation Re-
search submissions; 
‘‘(iv) strategic alliances; 
‘‘(v) business model development; and 
‘‘(vi) preparation for investors; and 
‘‘(C) help small business improve environ-
mental performance by shifting to less haz-
ardous materials and reducing waste and emis-
sions at the source, including by providing as-
sistance for businesses to adapt the materials 
they use, the processes they operate, and the 
products and services they produce. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:07 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3221.PCS
H3221
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) shall apply with respect 
to loans made under this subsection. 
(B) SPECIAL RULES FOR DEFERRED PAR-
TICIPATION LOANS.—In the case of an agree-
ment to participate on a deferred basis in any 
such loan— 
(i) such participation by the Adminis-
tration shall be equal to 90 percent of the 
balance of the financing outstanding at the 
time of the disbursement of the loan; 
(ii) the Administrator shall collect (ex-
cept in the case of a loan that is repayable 
in 1 year or less) a guarantee fee, which 
shall be payable by the participating lender 
and may be charged to the borrower as fol-
lows: 
(I) A guarantee fee equal to 0.5 
percent of the deferred participation 
share of a total loan amount that is 
not more than $150,000. 
(II) A guarantee fee equal to 1.5 
percent of the deferred participation 
share of a total loan amount that is 
more than $150,000, but not more 
than $700,000.
(III) A guarantee fee equal to 2 
percent of the deferred participation 
share of a total loan amount that is 
more than $700,000; 
(iii) the annual fee assessed and col-
lected on any such loan shall not exceed an 
amount equal to 0.15 percent of the out-
standing balance of the deferred participa-
tion share of the loan; 
(iv) the Administrator may make such 
loans without regard to the ability of a 
small business concern to obtain credit 
elsewhere; 
(v) the Administrator shall make such 
loans without regard to the availability of 
collateral to secure such loans; and 
(vi) the Administrator may charge in-
terest on any such loan. Such charge may 
not exceed a rate of 4 percent per year. 
(3) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis-
trator shall issue interim final rules and guidelines 
to implement this subsection.
(4) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary to carry out this subsection. 
Æ
(b) OTHER DEFINITIONS.—The definitions in section 
108 apply to this title. 
Æ
272 
(j), if submitted in compliance with such subsection, 
shall not be considered as labeling, adulteration, or 
misbranding of the drug or device under the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et 
seq.). 
TITLE IX—ENHANCED AUTHORI-
TIES 
REGARDING 
POSTMARKET 
SAFETY 
OF 
DRUGS 
Subtitle A—Postmarket Studies 
and Surveillance 
SEC. 901. POSTMARKET STUDIES AND CLINICAL TRIALS RE-
GARDING HUMAN DRUGS; RISK EVALUATION 
AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 505 of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) is amended by 
adding at the end the following subsections: 
‘‘(o) POSTMARKET STUDIES AND CLINICAL TRIALS; 
LABELING.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A responsible person may 
not introduce or deliver for introduction into inter-
state commerce the new drug involved if the person 
is in violation of a requirement established under 
paragraph (3) or (4) with respect to the drug. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:45 Sep 21, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00272
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3580.CPH
H3580
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4236 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 
business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 
depreciation. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
NOVEMBER 4, 2005 
Mr. CHOCOLA (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. HERGER, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. 
NUSSLE, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. WELLER, Mr. HULSHOF, 
Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. BEAUPREZ, and Mr. LUCAS) 
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat cer-
tain farming business machinery and equipment as 5- 
year property for purposes of depreciation. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND 
EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 5-YEAR PROPERTY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(B) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 5-year property) is 
amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (v), by 
striking the period at the end of clause (vi)(III) and in-
serting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting after clause (vi) the fol-
lowing new clause: 
‘‘(vii) any machinery or equipment 
(other than any grain bin, cotton ginning 
asset, fence, or other land improvement) 
which is used in a farming business (as de-
fined in section 263A(e)(4)) and placed in 
service before January 1, 2010.’’. 
(b) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 
section 168(g)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to special rule for certain property assigned 
to classes) is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to subparagraph (B)(iii) the following: 
‘‘(B)(vii) ....................................................................................................
10’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to property placed in service after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 456 
To restore State sovereignty. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 1, 2005 
Mr. CULBERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Government Reform 
A BILL 
To restore State sovereignty. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoration of State 
Sovereignty Act of 2005’’. 
SEC. 2. STATES TO RETAIN RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES 
THEY DO NOT EXPRESSLY WAIVE. 
(a) RETENTION OF RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES.—No 
officer, employee, or other authority of the Federal Gov-
ernment shall enforce against an authority of a State, nor 
shall any authority of a State have any obligation to obey, 
any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving Fed-
eral financial assistance under a grant program estab-
lished under Federal law, nor shall such program operate 
within a State, unless the legislature of that State shall 
have by law expressly approved that program and, in doing 
so, have waived the State’s rights and authorities to act 
inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed 
by the Federal Government as a condition of receiving 
that assistance. 
(b) DEFINITION OF STATE AUTHORITY.—As used in 
this section, the term ‘‘authority of a State’’ includes any 
officer or employee of the State and any local government 
authority of the State. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section applies in each 
State beginning at the end of the first regular session of 
the legislature of that State that begins after the date of 
the enactment of this Act and shall continue to apply in 
subsequent years until otherwise provided by law. 
Æ
(1) in section 2(j)(2) (12 U.S.C. 1841(j)(2)), by 
striking ‘‘Savings Association Insurance Fund’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Deposit Insurance Fund’’; and 
(2) in section 3(d)(1)(D)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 
1842(d)(1)(D)(iii)), by striking ‘‘appropriate deposit 
insurance fund’’ and inserting ‘‘Deposit Insurance 
Fund’’. 
(i) AMENDMENTS
TO
THE GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY 
ACT.—Section 114 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12 
U.S.C. 1828a) is amended by striking ‘‘any Federal de-
posit insurance fund’’ in subsection (a)(1)(B), paragraphs 
(2)(B) and (4)(B) of subsection (b), and subsection 
(c)(1)(B), each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘the 
Deposit Insurance Fund’’. 
(j) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend-
ments made by this section shall take effect on the day 
of the merger of the Bank Insurance Fund and the Sav-
ings Association Insurance Fund pursuant to the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005.
Passed the House of Representatives December 19 
(legislative day, December 18), 2005. 
Attest:
Clerk.
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 4636
AN ACT 
To enact the technical and conforming amendments 
necessary to implement the Federal Deposit In-
surance Reform Act of 2005, and for other pur-
poses.