(23) DUGWAY
CREEK, 
BRATENAHL, 
OHIO.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dugway 
Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio. 
(24) JOHNSON
CREEK, GRESHAM, OREGON.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Johnson 
Creek, Gresham, Oregon. 
(25) BEAVER CREEK, BEAVER AND SALEM, PENN-
SYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, Pennsylvania. 
(26) CEMENTON DAM, LEHIGH RIVER, PENNSYL-
VANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, Pennsylvania. 
(27) DELAWARE
RIVER, PHILADELPHIA
NAVAL 
SHIPYARD, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic eco-
system restoration, Delaware River in the vicinity of 
the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania. 
(28) SAUCON
CREEK, NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Saucon Creek, Northampton County, Penn-
sylvania. 
(29) BLACKSTONE
RIVER, RHODE
ISLAND.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Blackstone 
River, Rhode Island.
(30) WILSON BRANCH, CHERAW, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wil-
son Branch, Cheraw, South Carolina. 
(31) WHITE RIVER, BETHEL, VERMONT.—Project 
for aquatic ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, 
Vermont. 
SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal participa-
tion in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property’’, approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g): 
(1) NELSON LAGOON, ALASKA.—Project for shore-
line protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. 
(2) SANIBEL
ISLAND, 
FLORIDA.—Project for 
shoreline protection, Sanibel Island, Florida. 
(3) APRA HARBOR, GUAM.—Project for shoreline 
protection, Apra Harbor, Guam. 
(4) PITI, CABRAS
ISLAND, GUAM.—Project for 
shoreline protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam. 
(5) NARROWS AND GRAVESEND BAY, UPPER NEW 
YORK BAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.—Project for shore-
line protection in the vicinity of the confluence of the
Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, 
Brooklyn, New York. 
(6) DELAWARE
RIVER, PHILADELPHIA
NAVAL 
SHIPYARD, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for shoreline pro-
tection, Delaware River in the vicinity of the Phila-
delphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania. 
(7) PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS.—Project for shoreline 
protection, Port Aransas, Texas. 
SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDI-
MENT REMOVAL. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following 
project and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under sec-
tion 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 
U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and clearing and 
straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese 
Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York. 
TITLE II—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS. 
Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘(n) NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.—
‘‘(1) PROHIBITION ON SOLICITATION OF EXCESS 
CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary may not solicit con-