867 
‘‘(2) BIENNIAL
INTEGRATED
PLAN.—The bien-
nial integrated plan required under paragraph (1) 
shall include plans for the following: 
‘‘(A) Developing and maintaining a com-
prehensive list of cyber and information tech-
nology ranges, test facilities, test beds, and other 
means of testing, training, and developing soft-
ware, personnel, and tools for accommodating the 
mission of the Department. Such list shall in-
clude resources from both governmental and non-
governmental entities. 
‘‘(B) Organizing and managing designated 
cyber and information technology test ranges, in-
cluding— 
‘‘(i) establishing the priorities for cyber 
and information technology ranges to meet 
Department objectives; 
‘‘(ii) enforcing standards to meet re-
quirements specified by the United States 
Cyber Command, the training community, 
and the research, development, testing, and 
evaluation community; 
‘‘(iii) identifying and offering guid-
ance on the opportunities for integration 
amongst the designated cyber and informa-
868 
tion technology ranges regarding test, train-
ing, and development functions; 
‘‘(iv) finding opportunities for cost re-
duction, integration, and coordination im-
provements for the appropriate cyber and 
information technology ranges; 
‘‘(v) adding or consolidating cyber and 
information technology ranges in the future 
to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber 
strategy and resource requirements of the 
Department; 
‘‘(vi) finding opportunities to continu-
ously enhance the quality and technical ex-
pertise of the cyber and information tech-
nology test workforce through training and 
personnel policies; and 
‘‘(vii) coordinating with interagency 
and industry partners on cyber and infor-
mation technology range issues. 
‘‘(C) Defining a cyber range architecture 
that— 
‘‘(i) may add or consolidate cyber and 
information technology ranges in the future 
to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber
869 
strategy and resource requirements of the 
Department; 
‘‘(ii) coordinates with interagency and 
industry partners on cyber and information 
technology range issues; 
‘‘(iii) allows for integrated closed loop 
testing in a secure environment of cyber 
and electronic warfare capabilities; 
‘‘(iv) supports science and technology 
development, experimentation, testing and 
training; and 
‘‘(v) provides for interconnection with 
other existing cyber ranges and other kinetic 
range facilities in a distributed manner. 
‘‘(D) Certifying all cyber range investments 
of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(E) Performing such other assessments or 
analyses as the Secretary considers appropriate. 
‘‘(3) STANDARD FOR CYBER EVENT DATA.—The 
executive agents designated under subsection (a), in 
consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the 
Department of Defense, shall jointly select a standard 
language from open-source candidates for representing 
and communicating cyber event and threat data. 
Such language shall be machine-readable for the Joint
870 
Information Environment and associated test and 
training ranges. 
‘‘(c) SUPPORT WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military de-
partments, Defense Agencies, and other components of the 
Department of Defense provide the executive agents des-
ignated under subsection (a) with the appropriate support 
and resources needed to perform the roles, responsibilities, 
and authorities of the executive agents. 
‘‘(d) COMPLIANCE WITH EXISTING DIRECTIVE.—The 
Secretary shall carry out this section in compliance with 
Directive 5101.1. 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘designated cyber and information 
technology range’ includes the National Cyber Range, 
the Joint Information Operations Range, the Defense 
Information Assurance Range, and the C4 Assess-
ments Division of J6 of the Joint Staff. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘Directive 5101.1’ means Depart-
ment of Defense Directive 5101.1, or any successor di-
rective relating to the responsibilities of an executive 
agent of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘executive agent’ has the meaning 
given the term ‘DoD Executive Agent’ in Directive 
5101.1.’’.
871 
(b) DESIGNATION
AND ROLES
AND RESPONSIBIL-
ITIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, designate the executive agents 
required under subsection (a) of section 392 of title 
10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of 
this section; and 
(2) not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, prescribe the roles, responsibil-
ities, and authorities required under subsection (b) of 
such section 392. 
(c) SELECTION OF STANDARD LANGUAGE.—Not later 
than June 1, 2015, the executive agents designated under 
subsection (a) of section 392 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall select the 
standard language under subsection (b)(3) of such section 
392. 
(d) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 
sections at the beginning of chapter 19 of title 10, United 
States Code, as added by section 1632 of this Act, is amend-
ed by adding at the end the following new item: 
‘‘392. Executive agents for cyber test and training ranges.’’. 
SEC. 1634. CYBERSPACE MAPPING. 
(a) DESIGNATION OF NETWORK.—Not later than 60 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall develop a plan to use a controlled
872 
laboratory environment or an existing network or network 
segment within the Department of Defense to identify net-
work mapping capabilities to meet requirements of the 
United States Cyber Command. 
(b) RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal 
Cyber Advisor shall submit to the Secretary policy rec-
ommendations regarding the mapping of cyberspace to sup-
port the operational requirements of the United States 
Cyber Command. 
SEC. 1635. REVIEW OF CROSS DOMAIN SOLUTION POLICY 
AND REQUIREMENT FOR CROSS DOMAIN SO-
LUTION STRATEGY. 
(a) REVIEW OF POLICY.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall review the policies and guidance of the Department 
of Defense concerning the procurement, approval, and use 
of cross domain solutions by the Department of Defense. 
(b) STRATEGY FOR CROSS DOMAIN SOLUTIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall develop a strategy for procurement, approval, 
and use of cross domain solutions by the Department. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by para-
graph (1) shall include the following:
873 
(A) Identification and assessment of the 
current cross domain solutions in use throughout 
the Department of Defense, including the relative 
capabilities of such solutions and any gaps in 
current capabilities. 
(B) A determination of the requirements for 
cross domain solutions for enterprise applica-
tions as well as deployed warfighting operations, 
including operations with coalition partners. 
(C) A plan to enable verification of compli-
ance with Department of Defense policies regard-
ing the use of cross domain solutions. 
(D) A review of the current Department of 
Defense Information Assurance Certification and 
Accreditation Process for the applicability of 
such process to future virtualized cross domain 
technology. 
(E) A plan to meet the cross domain solu-
tion requirements for the Defense Intelligence In-
formation Enterprise that must operate within 
the Joint Information Environment and the In-
telligence Community Information Technology 
Environment.
874 
SEC. 1636. REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGY TO DEVELOP AND 
DEPLOY 
DECRYPTION 
SERVICE 
FOR 
THE 
JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT. 
(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall develop a strategy to develop and deploy a decryption 
service that enables the efficient decryption and re- 
encryption of encrypted communications within the Joint 
Information Environment and through the Internet access 
points of the Joint Information Environment in a manner 
that allows the Secretary to inspect the content of such com-
munications to detect cyber threats and insider threat activ-
ity. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required developed pur-
suant to subsection (a) shall include the following: 
(1) Requirements. 
(2) An estimate of the cost. 
(3) An assessment of the added security benefit. 
(4) An architecture. 
(5) A concept of operations. 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Not later than Octo-
ber 1, 2015, the Secretary shall brief the congressional de-
fense committees and the congressional intelligence commit-
tees (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) on the strategy developed under 
subsection (a).
875 
SEC. 1637. ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ECONOMIC OR INDUS-
TRIAL ESPIONAGE IN CYBERSPACE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 
thereafter through 2020, the President shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees a report on 
foreign economic and industrial espionage in cyber-
space during the 12-month period preceding the sub-
mission of the report that— 
(A) identifies— 
(i) foreign countries that engage in eco-
nomic or industrial espionage in cyberspace 
with respect to trade secrets or proprietary 
information owned by United States per-
sons; 
(ii) foreign countries identified under 
clause (i) that the President determines en-
gage in the most egregious economic or in-
dustrial espionage in cyberspace with re-
spect to such trade secrets or proprietary 
information (to be known as ‘‘priority for-
eign countries’’); 
(iii) categories of technologies or pro-
prietary information developed by United 
States persons that—
876 
(I) are targeted for economic or 
industrial espionage in cyberspace; 
and 
(II) to the extent practicable, have 
been appropriated through such espio-
nage; 
(iv) articles manufactured or otherwise 
produced using technologies or proprietary 
information described in clause (iii)(II); 
and 
(v) to the extent practicable, services 
provided using such technologies or propri-
etary information; 
(B) describes the economic or industrial es-
pionage engaged in by the foreign countries iden-
tified under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph 
(A); and 
(C) describes— 
(i) actions taken by the President to 
decrease the prevalence of economic or in-
dustrial espionage in cyberspace; and 
(ii) the progress made in decreasing 
the prevalence of such espionage. 
(2) DETERMINATION OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES EN-
GAGING IN ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE IN
877 
CYBERSPACE.—For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of 
paragraph (1)(A), the President shall identify a for-
eign country as a foreign country that engages in eco-
nomic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with re-
spect to trade secrets or proprietary information 
owned by United States persons if the government of 
the foreign country— 
(A) engages in economic or industrial espio-
nage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets 
or proprietary information owned by United 
States persons; or 
(B) facilitates, supports, fails to prosecute, 
or otherwise permits such espionage by— 
(i) individuals who are citizens or resi-
dents of the foreign country; or 
(ii) entities that are organized under 
the laws of the foreign country or are other-
wise subject to the jurisdiction of the gov-
ernment of the foreign country. 
(3) FORM OF REPORT.—Each report required by 
paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form 
but may contain a classified annex. 
(b) IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President may, pursuant 
to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act
878 
(50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), block and prohibit all trans-
actions in all property and interests in property of 
each person described in paragraph (2), if such prop-
erty and interests in property are in the United 
States, come within the United States, or are or come 
within the possession or control of a United States 
person. 
(2) PERSONS DESCRIBED.—A person described 
in this paragraph is a foreign person the President 
determines knowingly requests, engages in, supports, 
facilitates, or benefits from the significant appropria-
tion, through economic or industrial espionage in 
cyberspace, of technologies or proprietary information 
developed by United States persons. 
(3) EXCEPTION.—The authority to impose sanc-
tions under paragraph (1) shall not include the au-
thority to impose sanctions on the importation of 
goods. 
(4) IMPLEMENTATION; PENALTIES.— 
(A) IMPLEMENTATION.—The President may 
exercise all authorities provided under sections 
203 and 205 of the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 
1704) to carry out this subsection.
879 
(B) PENALTIES.—The penalties provided 
for in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of 
the International Emergency Economic Powers 
Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) shall apply to a person 
that violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to 
violate, or causes a violation of, this subsection 
or a regulation prescribed under this subsection 
to the same extent that such penalties apply to 
a person that commits an unlawful act described 
in section 206(a) of that Act. 
(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to affect the application of any penalty 
or the exercise of any authority provided for under any 
other provision of law. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) 
APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMIT-
TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional commit-
tees’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Af-
fairs, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Se-
curity and Governmental Affairs, the Committee 
on Finance, the Committee on Foreign Relations,
880 
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
Senate; and 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security, the Committee on 
Financial Services, the Committee on Foreign 
Affairs, the Committee on Ways and Means, and 
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the House of Representatives. 
(2) CYBERSPACE.—The term ‘‘cyberspace’’— 
(A) means the interdependent network of in-
formation technology infrastructures; and 
(B) includes the Internet, telecommuni-
cations networks, computer systems, and embed-
ded processors and controllers. 
(3) ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE.—The 
term ‘‘economic or industrial espionage’’ means— 
(A) stealing a trade secret or proprietary 
information or appropriating, taking, carrying 
away, or concealing, or by fraud, artifice, or de-
ception obtaining, a trade secret or proprietary 
information without the authorization of the 
owner of the trade secret or proprietary informa-
tion;
881 
(B) copying, duplicating, downloading, 
uploading, destroying, transmitting, delivering, 
sending, communicating, or conveying a trade 
secret or proprietary information without the 
authorization of the owner of the trade secret or 
proprietary information; or 
(C) knowingly receiving, buying, or pos-
sessing a trade secret or proprietary information 
that has been stolen or appropriated, obtained, 
or converted without the authorization of the 
owner of the trade secret or proprietary informa-
tion. 
(4) KNOWINGLY.—The term ‘‘knowingly’’, with 
respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means 
that a person has actual knowledge, or should have 
known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result. 
(5) OWN.—The term ‘‘own’’, with respect to a 
trade secret or proprietary information, means to 
hold rightful legal or equitable title to, or license in, 
the trade secret or proprietary information. 
(6) PERSON.—The term ‘‘person’’ means an in-
dividual or entity. 
(7) 
PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION.—The 
term 
‘‘proprietary information’’ means competitive bid 
preparations, negotiating strategies, executive emails,
882 
internal financial data, strategic business plans, tech-
nical designs, manufacturing processes, source code, 
data derived from research and development invest-
ments, and other commercially valuable information 
that a person has developed or obtained if— 
(A) the person has taken reasonable meas-
ures to keep the information confidential; and 
(B) the information is not generally known 
or readily ascertainable through proper means 
by the public. 
(8) TECHNOLOGY.—The term ‘‘technology’’ has 
the meaning given that term in section 16 of the Ex-
port Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 
2415) (as in effect pursuant to the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et 
seq.)). 
(9) TRADE
SECRET.—The term ‘‘trade secret’’ 
has the meaning given that term in section 1839 of 
title 18, United States Code. 
(10) 
UNITED
STATES
PERSON.—The 
term 
‘‘United States person’’ means— 
(A) an individual who is a citizen or resi-
dent of the United States;
883 
(B) an entity organized under the laws of 
the United States or any jurisdiction within the 
United States; or 
(C) a person located in the United States. 
SEC. 1638. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING ROLE OF RE-
SERVE COMPONENTS IN DEFENSE OF UNITED 
STATES AGAINST CYBER ATTACKS. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) members of the reserve components may pos-
sess knowledge of critical infrastructure in the States 
in which the members serve that may be of value for 
purposes of defending such infrastructure against 
cyber threats; 
(2) traditional members of the reserve compo-
nents and reserve component technicians may have 
experience in both the private and public sector that 
could benefit the readiness of the Department of De-
fense’s cyber force and the development of cyber capa-
bilities; 
(3) the long-standing relationship the reserve 
components has with local and civil authorities may 
be beneficial for purposes of providing for a coordi-
nated response to a cyber attack and defending 
against cyber threats;
884 
(4) the States are already working to establish 
cyber partnerships with the reserve components; and 
(5) the reserve components have a role in the de-
fense of the United States against cyber threats and 
consideration should be given to how the reserve com-
ponents might be integrated into a comprehensive na-
tional approach for cyber defense. 
SEC. 1639. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE FUTURE OF THE 
INTERNET AND THE .MIL TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN. 
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 
should— 
(1) work within the existing interagency process 
underway as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
regarding the transfer of the remaining role of the 
United States Government in the functions of the 
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to a global 
multi-stakeholder community and support transfer-
ring this role only if— 
(A) assurances are provided for the protec-
tion of the current status of legacy top-level do-
main names and Internet Protocol address num-
bers, particularly those used by the Department 
of Defense and the components of the United 
States Government for national security pur-
poses;
885 
(B) mechanisms are institutionalized to up-
hold and protect consensus-based decision mak-
ing in the multi-stakeholder approach; and 
(C) existing stress-testing scenarios of the 
accountability process of the multi-stakeholder 
model can be confidently shown to work trans-
parently, securely, and efficiently to maintain a 
free, open, and resilient Internet; and 
(2) take all necessary steps to sustain the success-
ful stewardship and good standing of the Internet root 
zone servers managed by components of the Depart-
ment of Defense, including active participation, re-
view, and analysis for transition planning documents 
and accountability stress testing. 
Subtitle D—Nuclear Forces 
SEC. 1641. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL BUDGET REQUEST 
REGARDING NUCLEAR WEAPONS. 
Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new para-
graphs: 
‘‘(3)(A) With respect to the preparation of a budget 
for a fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Con-
gress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of De-
fense may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nu-
clear budget request authority unless the Secretary of De-
886 
fense submits to the congressional defense committees a re-
port described in subparagraph (B). 
‘‘(B) A report described in this subparagraph is a re-
port that includes the following: 
‘‘(i) Except as provided by subparagraph (C), 
certification that, during the fiscal year prior to the 
fiscal year covered by the budget for which the report 
is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated or ex-
pended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer 
of estimated nuclear budget request authority made 
for such prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with 
a memorandum of agreement that was developed by 
the Nuclear Weapons Council and entered into by the 
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy. 
‘‘(ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weap-
ons Council regarding how the Administrator for Nu-
clear Security implemented any agreements and deci-
sions of the Council made during such prior fiscal 
year. 
‘‘(iii) An assessment from each of the Chairman 
of the Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of 
the United States Strategic Command regarding any 
effects to the military during such prior fiscal year 
that were caused by the delay or failure of the Admin-
887 
istrator to implement any agreements or decisions de-
scribed in clause (ii). 
‘‘(C) With respect to a report described in subpara-
graph (B), the Secretary may waive the requirement to in-
clude the certification described in clause (i) of such sub-
paragraph if the Secretary— 
‘‘(i) determines that such waiver is in the na-
tional security interests of the United States; and 
‘‘(ii) instead of the certification described in such 
clause (i), includes as part of such report— 
‘‘(I) a copy of the agreement that the Sec-
retary has entered into with the Secretary of En-
ergy regarding the manner and the purpose for 
which the Secretary of Energy will obligate or 
expend any amounts covered by a proposed 
transfer of estimated nuclear budget request au-
thority for the fiscal year covered by the budget 
for which such report is submitted; and 
‘‘(II) an explanation for why the Secretary 
did not include such certification in such report. 
‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the 
defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum 
of agreement described in subparagraph (B)(i) of para-
graph (3), or the agreement described in subparagraph (C)
888 
of such paragraph, as the case may be, that covers such fis-
cal year. 
‘‘(5)(A) Not later than 30 days after the President sub-
mits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 
1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States 
Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the 
Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of— 
‘‘(i) whether such budget allows the Federal Gov-
ernment to meet the nuclear stockpile and stockpile 
stewardship program requirements during the fiscal 
year covered by the budget and the four subsequent 
fiscal years; and 
‘‘(ii) if the Commander determines that such 
budget does not allow the Federal Government to meet 
such requirements, a description of the steps being 
taken to meet such requirements. 
‘‘(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which 
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assess-
ment of the Commander of the United States Strategic 
Command under subparagraph (A), the Chairman shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees— 
‘‘(i) such assessment as it was submitted to the 
Chairman; and 
‘‘(ii) any comments of the Chairman. 
‘‘(6) In this subsection:
889 
‘‘(A) The term ‘budget’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 231(f) of this title. 
‘‘(B) The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this 
title. 
‘‘(C) The term ‘proposed transfer of estimated 
nuclear budget request authority’ means, in preparing 
a budget, a request for the Secretary of Defense to 
transfer an estimated amount of the proposed budget 
authority of the Secretary to the Secretary of Energy 
for purposes relating to nuclear weapons.’’. 
SEC. 1642. IMPROVEMENT TO BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT ON 
DELIVERY PLATFORMS FOR NUCLEAR WEAP-
ONS AND THE NUCLEAR COMMAND AND CON-
TROL SYSTEM. 
Section 492(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting ‘‘, and the ability to meet operational 
availability requirements for,’’ after ‘‘military effectiveness 
of’’. 
SEC. 1643. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE REVIEW OF 
COST ESTIMATES FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS. 
Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 
1576), as most recently amended by section 1054 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Pub-
890 
lic Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861), is further amended by 
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new sub-
section (b): 
‘‘(b) ESTIMATE OF COSTS BY CONGRESSIONAL BUDG-
ET OFFICE.— 
‘‘(1) BUDGETS
FOR
ODD-NUMBERED
FISCAL 
YEARS.—Not later than July 1 of each year in which 
the President transmits a covered odd-numbered fiscal 
year report, the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report that includes— 
‘‘(A) an estimate of the costs during the 10- 
year period beginning on the date of such covered 
odd-numbered fiscal year report associated with 
fielding and maintaining the current nuclear 
weapons and nuclear weapon delivery systems of 
the United States; 
‘‘(B) an estimate of the costs during such 
period of any life extension, modernization, or 
replacement of any current nuclear weapons or 
nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United 
States that is anticipated as of the date of such 
covered odd-numbered fiscal year report; and 
‘‘(C) an estimate of the relative percentage 
of total defense spending during such period rep-
891 
resented by the costs estimated under subpara-
graphs (A) and (B). 
‘‘(2) BUDGETS
FOR
EVEN-NUMBERED
FISCAL 
YEARS.—If the Director determines that a covered 
even-numbered fiscal year report contains a signifi-
cant change that affects the estimates of the Director 
included in the report submitted under paragraph (1) 
in the year prior to the year in which such covered 
even-numbered fiscal year report is submitted, the Di-
rector shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a letter describing such significant changes. 
‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) The term ‘covered even-numbered fiscal 
year report’ means a report required to be trans-
mitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 
days after the submission to Congress of the 
budget of the President for an even-numbered fis-
cal year. 
‘‘(B) The term ‘covered odd-numbered fiscal 
year report’ means a report required to be trans-
mitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 
days after the submission to Congress of the 
budget of the President for an odd-numbered fis-
cal year.’’.
892 
SEC. 1644. RETENTION OF MISSILE SILOS. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—During the period in which the 
New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of 
title 10, United States Code) is in effect, the Secretary of 
Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile 
silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that 
enables such silo to— 
(1) remain a fully functioning element of the 
interconnected and redundant command and control 
system of the missile field; and 
(2) be made fully operational with a deployed 
missile. 
(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection 
(b) shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary of Defense 
from temporarily placing an intercontinental ballistic mis-
sile silo offline to perform maintenance activities. 
SEC. 1645. PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN PARTS 
OF INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE 
FUZES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force may 
enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of cov-
ered parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze. 
(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by sec-
893 
tion 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force 
as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $4,700,000 
shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pur-
suant to contracts entered into under subsection (a). 
(c) COVERED PARTS DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘covered parts’’ means commercially available off-the- 
shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 1646. ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPON SECONDARY 
REQUIREMENT. 
(a) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, in co-
ordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Com-
mander of the United States Strategic Command, shall as-
sess the annual secondary production requirement needed 
to sustain a safe, secure, reliable, and effective nuclear de-
terrent. 
(b) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy 
and the Commander of the United States Strategic 
Command, shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report regarding the assessment con-
ducted under subsection (a).
894 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The report under 
paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) An explanation of the rationale and as-
sumptions that led to the current 50 to 80 
secondaries per year production requirement, in-
cluding the factors considered in determining 
such requirement. 
(B) An analysis of whether there are any 
changes to such 50 to 80 secondaries per year 
production requirement, including the reasons 
for any such changes. 
(C) A description of how the secondary pro-
duction requirement is affected by or related to— 
(i) the demands of stockpile moderniza-
tion, including the schedule for life exten-
sion programs; 
(ii) the requirement for a responsive 
infrastructure, including the ability to 
hedge against technical failure and geo-
political risk; and 
(iii) the number of secondaries held in 
reserve or the inactive stockpile, and the 
likelihood such secondaries may be reused.
895 
(E) The proposed timeframe for achieving 
such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production 
requirement. 
(3) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex. 
SEC. 1647. CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR FORCE STRUC-
TURE. 
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in 
coordination with the Commander of the United States 
Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional de-
fense committees that the plan for implementation of the 
New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of 
title 10, United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, 
will enable the United States to meet its obligations under 
such treaty in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of 
the United States— 
(1) are capable, survivable, and balanced; and 
(2) maintain strategic stability, deterrence and 
extended deterrence, and allied assurance. 
SEC. 1648. ADVANCE NOTICE AND REPORTS ON B61 LIFE EX-
TENSION PROGRAM. 
(a) NOTIFICATION AND REPORTS.—Not later than 30 
days before any decision is made to reduce the number of
896 
final production units for the B61 life extension program 
below the total number of such units planned in the stock-
pile stewardship and management plan required by section 
4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) 
for fiscal year 2015— 
(1) the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Coun-
cil established under section 179 of title 10, United 
States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report that includes— 
(A) a notification of such decision; 
(B) an explanation of the proposed changes 
to the life extension program; and 
(C) a comprehensive discussion of the jus-
tification for such changes; and 
(2) the Commander of the United States Stra-
tegic Command shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report that includes— 
(A) an assessment of such changes to the life 
extension program; 
(B) a description of the risks associated 
with such decision; 
(C) an assessment of the impact of such de-
cision on the ability of the United States Stra-
tegic Command to meet deterrence, extended de-
897 
terrence, and assurance requirements during the 
expected lifetime of the B61–12 bomb; and 
(D) such other matters as the Commander 
considers appropriate. 
(b) FORM OF REPORTS.—Each report required by sub-
section (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may 
include a classified annex. 
SEC. 1649. NOTIFICATION AND REPORT CONCERNING RE-
MOVAL OR CONSOLIDATION OF DUAL-CAPA-
BLE AIRCRAFT FROM EUROPE. 
(a) NOTIFICATION AND REPORT.—Not later than 90 
days before the date on which the Secretary of Defense re-
moves or consolidates dual-capable aircraft of the United 
States from the area of responsibility of the United States 
European Command, the Secretary shall notify the congres-
sional defense committees of such proposed removal or con-
solidation. Such notification shall include a report explain-
ing— 
(1) how such removal or consolidation is in the 
national security interests of the United States and 
the allies of the United States, including the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance; and 
(2) whether, and in what respects, such proposed 
removal or consolidation is affected by—
898 
(A) the armed forces of the Russian Federa-
tion continuing to illegally occupy Ukrainian 
territory; 
(B) the Russian Federation deploying or 
preparing to deploy its nuclear weapons to 
Ukrainian territory; 
(C) the Russian Federation not complying 
with the INF Treaty and other treaties and 
agreements to which it is a party; and 
(D) the Russian Federation not complying 
with the CFE Treaty and not lifting its suspen-
sion of Russian observance of its treaty obliga-
tions. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘CFE Treaty’’ means the Treaty 
on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at 
Paris, November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 
17, 1992. 
(2) The ‘‘dual-capable aircraft’’ means tactical 
fighter aircraft that can perform both conventional 
and nuclear missions. 
(3) The term ‘‘INF Treaty’’ means the Treaty 
Between the United States of America and the Union 
of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of 
Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Mis-
899 
siles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range 
Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington, 
December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 
1988. 
SEC. 1650. REPORTS ON INSTALLATION OF NUCLEAR COM-
MAND, 
CONTROL, 
AND 
COMMUNICATIONS 
SYSTEMS AT HEADQUARTERS OF UNITED 
STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 
date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year 
is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 
31, United States Code, the Commander of the United 
States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the installation and oper-
ation of nuclear command, control, and communications 
systems associated with the construction of the headquarters 
of the United States Strategic Command. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall address, with respect to the installation and operation 
of nuclear command, control, and communications systems 
associated with the construction of the headquarters of the 
United States Strategic Command, the following: 
(1) Milestones and costs associated with installa-
tion of communications systems.
900 
(2) Milestones and costs associated with inte-
grating targeting and analysis planning tools. 
(3) An assessment of progress on the upgrade of 
systems that existed before the date of the enactment 
of this Act, such as the Strategic Automated Com-
mand and Control System and the MILSTAR sat-
ellite communications system, for compatibility with 
such nuclear command, control, and communications 
systems. 
(4) Such other information as the Commander of 
the United States Strategic Command considers nec-
essary to assess adherence to overall cost, scope, and 
schedule milestones. 
(c) TERMINATION.—The Commander of the United 
States Strategic Command shall not be required to submit 
a report under subsection (a) with the budget of the Presi-
dent for any fiscal year after the date on which the Com-
mander certifies to the congressional defense committees 
that all milestones relating to the installation of nuclear 
command, control, and communications systems associated 
with the construction of the headquarters of the United 
States Strategic Command have been completed and such 
systems are fully operational.
901 
SEC. 1651. REPORT ON PLANS FOR RESPONSE OF DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE TO INF TREATY VIOLA-
TION. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report con-
taining a detailed description of any steps being taken or 
planned to be taken by the Secretary in response to actions 
of the Government of the Russian Federation in violation 
of its obligations under the INF Treaty in order to reduce 
the negative impact of such actions on the national security 
of the United States. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include a description of any plans to conduct activities re-
lating to the research, development, testing, or deployment 
of potential future military capabilities of the United 
States, including with respect to activities to modify, test, 
or deploy existing military systems, to deter or defend 
against the threat of intermediate-range nuclear force sys-
tems of Russia if Russia deploys such systems. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classi-
fied annex. 
(d) INF TREATY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘INF Treaty’’ means the Treaty Between the United States 
of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on
902 
the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter- 
Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate- 
Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington 
December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988. 
SEC. 1652. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON THE NUCLEAR TRIAD. 
It is the policy of the United States— 
(1) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace 
the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems con-
sisting of— 
(A) heavy bombers equipped with nuclear 
gravity bombs and air-launched nuclear cruise 
missiles; 
(B) land-based intercontinental ballistic 
missiles equipped with nuclear warheads that 
are capable of carrying multiple independently 
targetable reentry vehicles; and 
(C) ballistic missile submarines equipped 
with submarine launched ballistic missiles and 
multiple nuclear warheads; 
(2) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace 
a capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons and 
dual-capable fighter-bomber aircraft; 
(3) to deter potential adversaries and assure al-
lies and partners of the United States through strong 
and long-term commitment to the nuclear deterrent of
903 
the United States and the personnel, systems, and in-
frastructure that comprise such deterrent; and 
(4) to ensure that the members of the Armed 
Forces who operate the nuclear deterrent of the United 
States have the training, resources, and national sup-
port required to execute the critical national security 
mission of the members. 
SEC. 1653. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DETERRENCE AND DE-
FENSE POSTURE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 
TREATY ORGANIZATION. 
It is the sense of Congress that the United States reaf-
firms and remains committed to the policies enumerated 
by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Deter-
rence and Defense Posture Review, dated May 20, 2012, and 
the Wales Summit Declaration of September 2014, includ-
ing the following statements: 
(1) As stated in the Deterrence and Defense Pos-
ture Review: 
(A) ‘‘The greatest responsibility of the Alli-
ance is to protect and defend our territory and 
our populations against attack, as set out in Ar-
ticle 5 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance 
does not consider any country to be its adver-
sary. However, no one should doubt NATO’s re-
solve if the security of any of its members were
904 
to be threatened. NATO will ensure that it main-
tains the full range of capabilities necessary to 
deter and defend against any threat to the safety 
and security of our populations, wherever it 
should arise. Allies’ goal is to bolster deterrence 
as a core element of our collective defense and 
contribute to the indivisible security of the Alli-
ance.’’. 
(B) ‘‘Nuclear weapons are a core component 
of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and 
defense alongside conventional and missile de-
fense forces. The review has shown that the Alli-
ance’s nuclear force posture currently meets the 
criteria for an effective deterrence and defense 
posture.’’. 
(C) ‘‘The circumstances in which any use of 
nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated 
are extremely remote. As long as nuclear weap-
ons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance. 
The supreme guarantee of the security of the Al-
lies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of 
the Alliance, particularly those of the United 
States; the independent strategic forces of the 
United Kingdom and France, which have a de-
905 
terrent role of their own, contribute to the overall 
deterrence and security of the Allies.’’. 
(D) ‘‘NATO must have the full range of ca-
pabilities necessary to deter and defend against 
threats to the safety of its populations and the 
security of its territory, which is the Alliance’s 
greatest responsibility.’’. 
(E) ‘‘NATO is committed to maintaining 
an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, 
and missile defense capabilities for deterrence 
and defense to fulfill its commitments as set out 
in the Strategic Concept. These capabilities, 
underpinned by NATO’s Integrated Command 
Structure, offer the strongest guarantee of the Al-
liance’s security and will ensure that it is able 
to respond to a variety of challenges and unpre-
dictable contingencies in a highly complex and 
evolving international security environment.’’. 
(2) As stated in the Wales Summit Declaration: 
(A) ‘‘Deterrence, based on an appropriate 
mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defence 
capabilities, remains a core element of our over-
all strategy.’’. 
(B) ‘‘Arms control, disarmament, and non- 
proliferation continue to play an important role
906 
in the achievement of the Alliance’s security ob-
jectives. Both the success and failure of these ef-
forts can have a direct impact on the threat en-
vironment of NATO. In this context, it is of 
paramount importance that disarmament and 
non-proliferation commitments under existing 
treaties are honoured, including the Inter-
mediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, 
which is a crucial element of Euro-Atlantic secu-
rity. In that regard, Allies call on Russia to pre-
serve the viability of the INF Treaty through en-
suring full and verifiable compliance.’’. 
Subtitle E—Missile Defense 
Programs 
SEC. 1661. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR IRON DOME 
SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM. 
(a) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized 
to be appropriated by section 1502 for procurement, De-
fense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, 
not more than $350,972,000 may be provided to the Govern-
ment of Israel to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket 
defense system as specified in the funding table in section 
4102, including for co-production of Iron Dome parts and 
components in the United States by industry of the United 
States.
907 
(b) CONDITIONS.— 
(1) AGREEMENT.—Funds described in subsection 
(a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket de-
fense program shall be available subject to the terms, 
conditions, and co-production targets specified for fis-
cal year 2015 in the ‘‘Agreement Between the Depart-
ment of Defense of the United States of America and 
the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Con-
cerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,’’ 
signed on March 5, 2014. 
(2) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days 
prior to the initial obligation of funds described in 
subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acqui-
sition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit 
to the congressional defense committees— 
(A) a certification that the agreement speci-
fied in paragraph (1) is being implemented as 
provided in such agreement; and 
(B) an assessment detailing any risks relat-
ing to the implementation of such agreement.
908 
SEC. 1662. TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF MISSILE DE-
FENSE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO PRODUCTION AND 
DEPLOYMENT. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) it is a high priority of the United States that 
the ballistic missile defense system should work in an 
operationally effective and cost-effective manner; 
(2) prior to making final production decisions 
for such systems, and prior to the operational deploy-
ment of such systems, the United States should con-
duct operationally realistic intercept flight testing 
that should create sufficiently challenging operational 
conditions to establish confidence that such systems 
will work in an operationally effective and cost-effec-
tive manner when needed; and 
(3) in order to achieve these objectives, and to 
avoid post-production and post-deployment problems, 
it is essential for the Department of Defense to follow 
a ‘‘fly before you buy’’ approach to adequately test 
and assess the elements of the ballistic missile defense 
system before final production decisions or oper-
ational deployment. 
(b) SUCCESSFUL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL 
PRODUCTION OR OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENT.—The Sec-
909 
retary of Defense may not make a final production decision 
for, or operationally deploy, a covered system unless— 
(1) the Secretary ensures that— 
(A) sufficient and operationally realistic 
testing of the covered system is conducted to as-
sess the performance of the covered system in 
order to inform a final production decision or an 
operational deployment decision; and 
(B) the results of such testing have dem-
onstrated a high probability that the covered sys-
tem— 
(i) will work in an operationally effec-
tive manner; and 
(ii) has the ability to accomplish the 
intended mission of the covered system; 
(2) the Director of Operational Test and Evalua-
tion has carried out subsection (c) with respect to 
such covered system; and 
(3) the Commander of the United States Stra-
tegic Command has carried out subsection (d) with 
respect to such covered system. 
(c) ASSESSMENT BY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL TEST 
AND EVALUATION.—The Director of Operational Test and 
Evaluation shall—
910 
(1) provide to the Secretary the assessment of the 
Director, based on the available test data, of the suffi-
ciency, adequacy, and results of the testing of each 
covered system, including an assessment of whether 
the covered system will be sufficiently effective, suit-
able, and survivable when needed; and 
(2) submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a written summary of such assessment. 
(d) ASSESSMENT BY COMMANDER OF UNITED STATES 
STRATEGIC COMMAND.—The Commander of the United 
States Strategic Command shall— 
(1) provide to the Secretary a military utility 
assessment of the operational utility of each covered 
system; and 
(2) not later than 30 days after providing such 
assessment to the Secretary, submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a written summary of such 
assessment. 
(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect a de-
termination of the Secretary with respect to the participa-
tion of the Missile Defense Agency in the Joint Capabilities 
Integration Development System or the acquisition report-
ing process under the Department of Defense Directive 5000 
series.
911 
(f) COVERED SYSTEM.—In this section, the term ‘‘cov-
ered system’’ means a new or substantially upgraded inter-
ceptor or weapon system of the ballistic missile defense sys-
tem, other than the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle 
covered by the acquisition plan developed under section 
1663. 
SEC. 1663. ACQUISITION PLAN FOR RE-DESIGNED EXO-AT-
MOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) the existing models of the exo-atmospheric 
kill vehicle of the ground-based midcourse defense sys-
tem are prototype designs that were developed and de-
ployed without using traditional acquisition practices 
in order to provide an initial defensive capability for 
an emerging ballistic missile threat; 
(2) consequently, while the deployed models of 
the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle have demonstrated an 
initial level of capability against a limited threat, 
such models do not have the degree of reliability, 
robustness, cost effectiveness, and performance that 
are desirable; 
(3) the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the 
ground-based midcourse defense system needs to be re-
912 
designed to substantially improve the performance 
and reliability of such kill vehicles; and 
(4) the Secretary of Defense should follow a ro-
bust and rigorous acquisition plan for the design, de-
velopment, and testing of the re-designed exo-atmos-
pheric kill vehicle. 
(b) ACQUISITION PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall develop an acquisition plan for the re-design 
of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle of the ground-based mid-
course defense system that includes rigorous elements for 
system engineering, design, integration, development, test-
ing, and evaluation. 
(c) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives of the acquisition 
plan under subsection (b) shall be to ensure that the re- 
designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle is operationally effec-
tive, reliable, producible, cost effective, maintainable, and 
testable. 
(d) APPROVAL OF ACQUISITION PLAN REQUIRED.— 
The acquisition plan under subsection (b) shall be subject 
to approval by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion, Technology, and Logistics. 
(e) TESTING REQUIRED.—Prior to operational deploy-
ment of the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, the Sec-
retary shall ensure that the re-designed kill vehicle has dem-
913 
onstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight 
testing— 
(1) a high probability of working in an oper-
ationally effective manner; and 
(2) the ability to accomplish the intended mis-
sion of the re-designed kill vehicle, including against 
more complex emerging ballistic missile threats. 
(f) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 60 days after 
the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acqui-
sition, Technology, and Logistics approves the acquisition 
plan under subsection (d), the Director of the Missile De-
fense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report describing the acquisition plan and the 
manner in which the plan will meet the objectives described 
in subsection (c). 
SEC. 1664. STUDY ON TESTING PROGRAM OF GROUND- 
BASED MIDCOURSE MISSILE DEFENSE SYS-
TEM. 
(a) STUDY.— Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
enter into a contract with a federally funded research and 
development center to conduct a study on the testing pro-
gram of the ground-based midcourse missile defense system. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The study under subsection (a) shall 
include the following:
914 
(1) An assessment of whether the testing program 
described in subsection (a) has established, as of the 
date of the study, that the ground-based midcourse 
missile defense system has a high probability of per-
forming reliably and effectively against limited mis-
sile threats from North Korea and Iran under real-
istic operational conditions, including an explanation 
of the degree of confidence supporting such assessment. 
(2) An assessment of whether the currently 
planned testing program, if implemented, is sufficient 
to establish reasonable confidence that the ground- 
based midcourse missile defense system has a high 
probability of performing reliably and effectively 
under realistic operational conditions against current 
and plausible near- and medium-term limited bal-
listic missile threats from North Korea and Iran. 
(3) Any recommendations for improvements that 
could be made to the testing program to— 
(A) achieve reasonable confidence that the 
system would be reliable and effective under real-
istic operational conditions; or 
(B) improve test and cost efficiencies. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after entering 
into the contract under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report con-
915 
taining the study. The report shall be submitted in unclassi-
fied form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 1665. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON HOME-
LAND BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) it is a national priority to defend the United 
States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic 
missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or 
deliberate); 
(2) although the currently deployed ground-based 
midcourse defense system provides a level of protec-
tion of the entire United States homeland, including 
the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic 
missile attack from North Korea and Iran, this capa-
bility needs to be improved to meet evolving ballistic 
missile threats; 
(3) the initial step in this process of improve-
ment is to correct the problems that caused the flight 
test failures with the current kill vehicles, and to im-
prove the reliability of the deployed ground-based in-
terceptor fleet; 
(4) as indicated by senior officials of the Depart-
ment of Defense, continued investments to enhance 
homeland defense sensor and discrimination capabili-
916 
ties are essential to improve the operational effective-
ness and shot doctrine of the ground-based midcourse 
defense system; 
(5) given limitations with the currently deployed 
exo-atmospheric kill vehicles, it is important to re-de-
sign the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle using a rigorous 
acquisition approach, including realistic testing, that 
can achieve a demonstrated capability as soon as 
practicable using sound acquisition principles and 
practices; and 
(6) in order to stay ahead of evolving ballistic 
missile threats, the Department should design the next 
generation exo-atmospheric kill vehicle to take full ad-
vantage of improvements in sensors, discrimination, 
kill assessment, battle management, and command 
and control, including the potential to engage mul-
tiple objects. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the 
Commander of the United States Northern Command, 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 
report setting forth the status of current and planned
917 
efforts to improve the homeland ballistic missile de-
fense capability of the United States. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph 
(1) shall include the following: 
(A) A detailed description of the current as-
sessment of the threat to the United Sates from 
limited ballistic missile attack (whether acci-
dental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly 
from countries such as North Korea and Iran, 
and an assessment of the projected future threat 
through 2023, including a discussion of con-
fidence levels and uncertainties in such threat 
assessment. 
(B) A detailed description of the status of 
efforts to correct the problems that caused the 
flight test failures of the capability enhancement- 
I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric 
kill vehicles. 
(C) A detailed description of the status of 
efforts to field the additional 14 ground-based 
interceptors planned for deployment at Fort 
Greely, Alaska, including the status of the refur-
bishment of Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, and 
the operational impact of the additional inter-
ceptors.
918 
(D) A detailed description of the plans and 
progress toward improving the capability, reli-
ability, and availability of fielded ground-based 
interceptors, including progress toward improv-
ing the capabilities of ground-based interceptors 
deployed with upgraded capability enhancement- 
I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric 
kill vehicles. 
(E) A detailed description of the planned 
improvements to homeland ballistic missile de-
fense sensor and discrimination capabilities, in-
cluding through the use of additional sensor sys-
tems of the United States, and an assessment of 
the expected operational benefits of such improve-
ments to homeland ballistic missile defense. 
(F) A detailed description of the plans and 
efforts to redesign, develop, test, and field the 
exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based 
midcourse defense system, and an explanation of 
the expected improvements of such kill vehicle 
with respect to capability, cost effectiveness, reli-
ability, maintainability, and producibility. 
(G) A detailed description of the plans for 
developing, testing, and fielding the next genera-
tion exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, and an expla-
919 
nation of how the anticipated capabilities are 
intended to remain ahead of evolving ballistic 
missile threats. 
(H) A status of efforts on, and goals for, a 
common kill vehicle with multiple object kill ca-
pability, and an explanation of how such capa-
bility could keep the missile defense capability of 
the United States paced ahead of evolving bal-
listic missile threats. 
(I) A detailed description of the options to 
improve the homeland ballistic missile defense 
capability that would respond to the emergence 
of a long-range ballistic missile threat from Iran, 
including an evaluation of the potential benefits 
and drawbacks of— 
(i) the deployment of a missile defense 
interceptor site on the East Coast; 
(ii) the deployment of a missile defense 
interceptor site in another location in the 
United States other than on the East Coast; 
(iii) the deployment of a missile de-
fense interceptor site in a location other 
than in the United States; and 
(iv) the deployment of additional 
ground-based interceptors for the ground-
920 
based midcourse defense system at Fort 
Greely, Alaska, or Vandenberg Air Force 
Base, California, or both. 
(J) Any other matters the Director considers 
appropriate. 
(3) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex. 
SEC. 1666. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON RE-
GIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) the regional ballistic missile capabilities of 
countries such as Iran and North Korea pose a seri-
ous and growing threat to forward deployed forces of 
the United States, allies, and partner countries; 
(2) given this growing threat, it is a high pri-
ority for the United States to develop, test, and deploy 
effective regional missile defense capabilities to pro-
vide the commanders of the geographic combatant 
commands with capabilities to meet the operational 
requirements of the commanders, and for allies and 
partners of the United States to improve their re-
gional missile defense capabilities;
921 
(3) the United States and its North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization partners should continue the de-
velopment, testing, and implementation of phases 2 
and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach to 
defend forward deployed forces of the United States, 
allies, and partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Or-
ganization in Europe against the growing regional 
missile capability of Iran; 
(4) the United States should continue efforts to 
improve regional missile defense capabilities in the 
Middle East, including its close cooperation with 
Israel and its efforts with countries of the Gulf Co-
operation Council, in order to improve regional secu-
rity against the growing regional missile capabilities 
of Iran; and 
(5) the United States should continue to work 
closely with its allies in Asia, particularly Japan, 
South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional mis-
sile defense capabilities, particularly against the 
growing threat from North Korean ballistic missiles. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Com-
mander of the United States Strategic Command, shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee
922 
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report set-
ting forth the status and progress of efforts to improve the 
regional missile defense capabilities of the United States in 
Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region, in-
cluding efforts and cooperation by allies and partner coun-
tries. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (b) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A detailed description of the status of imple-
mentation (including on the basis of technical devel-
opment and acquisition of systems and capabilities) 
of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, includ-
ing— 
(A) the status of efforts to develop, test, and 
deploy the capabilities planned for phases 2 and 
3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach; 
(B) a detailed description of the current 
and projected defended area of each phase of the 
European Phased Adaptive Approach and the 
missile defense requirement for the capability 
provided under each such phase; 
(C) a detailed description of current force 
structure plans of the United States and the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization associated
923 
with the different phases of the European Phased 
Adaptive Approach at various alert conditions 
and readiness levels; 
(D) a detailed explanation of the current 
concept of operations for phase 1 of the Euro-
pean Phased Adaptive Approach and informa-
tion on phase 2, including— 
(i) the arrangements for allocating the 
command of assets assigned to the missile 
defense of Europe between the Commander 
of the United States European Command 
and the Supreme Allied Commander, Eu-
rope; 
(ii) 
an 
explanation 
of 
the 
cir-
cumstances under which such command 
would be allocated to each such commander; 
and 
(iii) a description of the prioritization 
of defense of both the deployed forces of the 
United States and the territory of the mem-
ber states of the North Atlantic Treaty Or-
ganization using available missile defense 
interceptor inventory; 
(E) an explanation of the concept for the 
defense of assets of the European Phased Adapt-
924 
ive Approach in the event such assets are tar-
geted by adversaries; and 
(F) an explanation of the development and 
acquisition of the active layered theater ballistic 
missile defense system of the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization, including the interoper-
ability of such system with the ballistic missile 
defense system and other command and control 
systems of the United States. 
(2) A detailed description of the status of efforts 
to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of 
the United States and the countries of the Gulf Co-
operation Council in the Middle East against re-
gional missile threats from Iran, including the 
progress made toward, and benefits of, multilateral 
cooperation and data sharing among the countries of 
the Gulf Cooperation Council with respect to multilat-
eral integrated air and missile defense against threats 
from Iran. 
(3) A detailed description of the progress of the 
United States and the allies of the United States in 
the Asia-Pacific region, particularly Japan, South 
Korea, and Australia, to improve regional ballistic 
missile defense capabilities and an assessment of the 
value of increasing cooperation, information sharing,
925 
and opportunities for additional interoperability on a 
bilateral and multilateral basis. 
(4) A description of how the missile defense ac-
quisitions of allies and partners of the United States, 
including the acquisition of missile defense technology 
of the United States, could be optimized to contribute 
to integrated and networked regional missile defense, 
including a description of any steps being taken to 
carry out such optimization. 
(5) A detailed description of— 
(A) the degree of coordination among the 
commanders of the geographic combatant com-
mands with respect to integrated missile defense 
planning and operations, including obstacles 
and opportunities to improving such coordina-
tion and integrated capabilities; and 
(B) efforts to integrate offensive and defen-
sive forces, as specified in the ‘‘Joint Integrated 
Air and Missile Defense Strategy: Vision 2020’’ 
signed by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
Staff in December 2013. 
(6) A detailed description of the phased and 
adaptive elements of the regional missile defense ap-
proaches of the United States tailored to the specific 
regional requirements in the areas of responsibility of
926 
the United States Central Command and the United 
States Pacific Command, including the role of missile 
defense capabilities of allies and partners of the 
United States in each region. 
(7) A detailed description of the regional missile 
defense risk assessment and priorities of the com-
manders of the geographic combatant commands and 
a detailed description of the assessed ballistic missile 
threat facing each geographic combatant command 
through 2024. 
(8) A detailed explanation of the contributions 
made by the regional missile defense capabilities of 
the United States to the defense of the United States. 
(9) Such other matters as the Director considers 
appropriate. 
(d) FORM.—The report required by subsection (b) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classi-
fied annex. 
TITLE XVII—NATIONAL COMMIS-
SION ON THE FUTURE OF THE 
ARMY 
Subtitle A—Establishment and Duties of Commission 
Sec. 1701. Short title. 
Sec. 1702. National Commission on the Future of the Army. 
Sec. 1703. Duties of the Commission. 
Sec. 1704. Powers of the Commission. 
Sec. 1705. Commission personnel matters. 
Sec. 1706. Termination of the Commission. 
Sec. 1707. Funding.
927 
Subtitle B—Related Limitations 
Sec. 1711. Prohibition on use of fiscal year 2015 funds to reduce strengths of 
Army personnel. 
Sec. 1712. Limitations on the transfer, including preparations for the transfer, 
of AH–64 Apache helicopters assigned to the Army National 
Guard. 
Subtitle A—Establishment and 
Duties of Commission 
SEC. 1701. SHORT TITLE. 
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘National Commis-
sion on the Future of the Army Act of 2014’’. 
SEC. 1702. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF THE 
ARMY. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Na-
tional Commission on the Future of the Army (in this sub-
title referred to as the ‘‘Commission’’). 
(b) MEMBERSHIP.— 
(1) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be 
composed of eight members, of whom— 
(A) four shall be appointed by the Presi-
dent; 
(B) one shall be appointed by the Chairman 
of the Committee on Armed Services of the Sen-
ate; 
(C) one shall be appointed by the Ranking 
Member of the Committee on Armed Services of 
the Senate;
928 
(D) one shall be appointed by the Chairman 
of the Committee on Armed Services of the House 
of Representatives; and 
(E) one shall be appointed by the Ranking 
Member of the Committee on Armed Services of 
the House of Representatives. 
(2) APPOINTMENT DATE.—The appointments of 
the members of the Commission shall be made not 
later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act. 
(3) EFFECT OF LACK OF APPOINTMENT BY AP-
POINTMENT
DATE.—If one or more appointments 
under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not 
made by the appointment date specified in paragraph 
(2), the authority to make such appointment or ap-
pointments shall expire, and the number of members 
of the Commission shall be reduced by the number 
equal to the number of appointments so not made. If 
an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or 
(E) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment 
date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to 
make an appointment under such subparagraph shall 
expire, and the number of members of the Commission 
shall be reduced by the number equal to the number 
otherwise appointable under such subparagraph.
929 
(4) 
EXPERTISE.—In 
making 
appointments 
under this subsection, consideration should be given to 
individuals with expertise in national and inter-
national security policy and strategy, military forces 
capability, force structure design, organization, and 
employment, and reserve forces policy. 
(c) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES.—Members 
shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any va-
cancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but 
shall be filled in the same manner as the original appoint-
ment. 
(d) CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR.—The Commission shall 
select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. 
(e) INITIAL MEETING.—Not later than 30 days after 
the date on which all members of the Commission have been 
appointed, the Commission shall hold its initial meeting. 
(f) MEETINGS.—The Commission shall meet at the call 
of the Chair. 
(g) QUORUM.—A majority of the members of the Com-
mission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of 
members may hold hearings. 
SEC. 1703. DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION. 
(a) STUDY ON STRUCTURE OF THE ARMY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall under-
take a comprehensive study of the structure of the
930 
Army, and policy assumptions related to the size and 
force mixture of the Army, in order— 
(A) to make an assessment of the size and 
force mixture of the active component of the 
Army and the reserve components of the Army; 
and 
(B) to make recommendations on the modi-
fications, if any, of the structure of the Army re-
lated to current and anticipated mission require-
ments for the Army at acceptable levels of na-
tional risk and in a manner consistent with 
available resources and anticipated future re-
sources. 
(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In undertaking the study 
required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give 
particular consideration to the following: 
(A) An evaluation and identification of a 
structure for the Army that— 
(i) has the depth and scalability to 
meet current and anticipated requirements 
of the combatant commands; 
(ii) achieves cost-efficiency between the 
regular and reserve components of the 
Army, manages military risk, takes advan-
tage of the strengths and capabilities of
931 
each, and considers fully burdened lifecycle 
costs; 
(iii) ensures that the regular and re-
serve components of the Army have the ca-
pacity needed to support current and an-
ticipated homeland defense and disaster as-
sistance missions in the United States; 
(iv) provides for sufficient numbers of 
regular members of the Army to provide a 
base of trained personnel from which the 
personnel of the reserve components of the 
Army could be recruited; 
(v) maintains a peacetime rotation 
force to avoid exceeding operational tempo 
goals of 1:2 for active members of the Army 
and 1:5 for members of the reserve compo-
nents of the Army; and 
(vi) manages strategic and operational 
risk by making tradeoffs among readiness, 
efficiency, effectiveness, capability, and af-
fordability. 
(B) An evaluation and identification of 
force generation policies for the Army with re-
spect to size and force mixture in order to fulfill 
current and anticipated mission requirements
932 
for the Army in a manner consistent with avail-
able resources and anticipated future resources, 
including policies in connection with— 
(i) readiness; 
(ii) training; 
(iii) equipment; 
(iv) personnel; and 
(v) maintenance of the reserve compo-
nents as an operational reserve in order to 
maintain as much as possible the level of 
expertise and experience developed since 
September 11, 2001. 
(C) An identification and evaluation of the 
distribution of responsibility and authority for 
the allocation of Army National Guard personnel 
and force structure to the States and territories. 
(D) An identification and evaluation of the 
strategic basis or rationale, analytical methods, 
and decision-making processes for the allocation 
of Army National Guard personnel and force 
structure to the States and territories. 
(b) STUDY ON TRANSFER OF CERTAIN AIRCRAFT.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Commission shall also 
conduct a study of a transfer of Army National
933 
Guard AH–64 Apache aircraft from the Army Na-
tional Guard to the regular Army. 
(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study 
required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall con-
sider the factors specified in subsection (a)(2). 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 2016, the 
Commission shall submit to the President and the congres-
sional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed 
statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission 
as a result of the studies required by subsections (a) and 
(b), together with its recommendations for such legislative 
and administrative actions as the Commission considers 
appropriate in light of the results of the studies. 
SEC. 1704. POWERS OF THE COMMISSION. 
(a) HEARINGS.—The Commission may hold such hear-
ings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testi-
mony, and receive such evidence as the Commission con-
siders advisable to carry out its duties under this subtitle. 
(b) INFORMATION FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The 
Commission may secure directly from any Federal depart-
ment or agency such information as the Commission con-
siders necessary to carry out its duties under this subtitle. 
Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of 
such department or agency shall furnish such information 
to the Commission.
934 
(c) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Commission may use the 
United States mails in the same manner and under the 
same conditions as other departments and agencies of the 
Federal Government. 
SEC. 1705. COMMISSION PERSONNEL MATTERS. 
(a) COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—Each member of 
the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the 
Federal Government may be compensated at a rate not to 
exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of $155,400 
for each day (including travel time) during which such 
member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the 
Commission. All members of the Commission who are offi-
cers or employees of the United States shall serve without 
compensation in addition to that received for their services 
as officers or employees of the United States. 
(b) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—The members of the Commis-
sion shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem 
in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of 
agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United 
States Code, while away from their homes or regular places 
of business in the performance of services for the Commis-
sion. 
(c) STAFF.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chair of the Commission 
may, without regard to the civil service laws and reg-
935 
ulations, appoint and terminate an executive director 
and such other additional personnel as may be nec-
essary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. 
The employment of an executive director shall be sub-
ject to confirmation by the Commission. 
(2) COMPENSATION.—The Chair of the Commis-
sion may fix the compensation of the executive direc-
tor and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 
and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United 
States Code, relating to classification of positions and 
General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of 
pay for the executive director and other personnel 
may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the Ex-
ecutive Schedule under section 5316 of such title. 
(d) DETAIL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Any Fed-
eral Government employee may be detailed to the Commis-
sion without reimbursement, and such detail shall be with-
out interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege. 
(e) PROCUREMENT OF TEMPORARY AND INTERMIT-
TENT SERVICES.—The Chair of the Commission may pro-
cure temporary and intermittent services under section 
3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individ-
uals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual 
rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive 
Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
936 
SEC. 1706. TERMINATION OF THE COMMISSION. 
The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date 
on which the Commission submits its report under this sub-
title. 
SEC. 1707. FUNDING. 
Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2015 by section 301 and available for operation and main-
tenance for the Army as specified in the funding table in 
section 4301 may be available for the activities of the Com-
mission under this subtitle. 
Subtitle B—Related Limitations 
SEC. 1711. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FISCAL YEAR 2015 
FUNDS TO REDUCE STRENGTHS OF ARMY 
PERSONNEL. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or oth-
erwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army 
may be used to reduce Army personnel below the end 
strength authorizations for personnel of the Army specified 
in section 401(1) for active duty personnel and section 411 
for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components of 
the Army.
937 
SEC. 1712. LIMITATIONS ON THE TRANSFER, INCLUDING 
PREPARATIONS FOR THE TRANSFER, OF AH– 
64 APACHE HELICOPTERS ASSIGNED TO THE 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD. 
(a) PROHIBITION
ON TRANSFERS DURING FISCAL 
YEAR 2015.—During fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of De-
fense and the Secretary of the Army may not transfer any 
AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard 
to the regular Army. 
(b) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON AIRCRAFT OR PER-
SONNEL TRANSFERS AND RELATED ACTIVITIES.—In addi-
tion to the prohibition on transfers imposed by subsection 
(a), but subject to the exceptions provided in subsection (e), 
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may 
not, before March 31, 2016— 
(1) divest, retire, or transfer, or prepare to di-
vest, retire, or transfer, any AH–64 Apache heli-
copters from the Army National Guard to the regular 
Army; or 
(2) reduce personnel related to any AH–64 
Apache helicopters of the Army National Guard below 
the levels of such personnel as of September 30, 2014. 
(c) CONTINUED READINESS OF AIRCRAFT AND PER-
SONNEL.—The Secretary of the Army shall ensure the con-
tinuing readiness of AH–64 Apache helicopters during fis-
938 
cal year 2015 as necessary to meet the requirements of com-
batant commanders. 
(d) EFFECT
ON PERSONNEL ACTIONS
AND TRAIN-
ING.—Notwithstanding the prohibition imposed by sub-
section (a), the limitation imposed by subsection (b), and 
the duty imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary of the 
Army may— 
(1) carry out any personnel action, as deter-
mined to be appropriate by the Secretary, necessary 
to support Army aviation readiness and operations; 
(2) conduct qualification and reclassification 
training for pilots, crew, and military occupational 
specialties related to Army Aviation; and 
(3) continue flight training and advanced quali-
fication courses for selected National Guard personnel 
related to AH–64 Apache helicopters in accordance 
with Army readiness requirements. 
(e) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to the Secretary of Defense 
certification required by subsection (f), the Secretary of the 
Army may— 
(1) during the period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act and ending on March 31, 
2016, make preparations for the transfer of not more 
than 48 AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army 
National Guard to the regular Army; and
939 
(2) during the period beginning on October 1, 
2015, and ending on March 31, 2016, transfer not 
more than 48 AH–64 Apache helicopters from the 
Army National Guard to the regular Army. 
(f) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—The certification re-
ferred to in subsection (e) is a certification by the Secretary 
of Defense in writing to the congressional defense commit-
tees that the commencement of preparations to transfer 
AH–64 Apache helicopters pursuant to the exception pro-
vided by subsection (e)(1) or a transfer of AH–64 Apache 
helicopters pursuant to the exception provided by subsection 
(e)(2) would not create unacceptable risk— 
(1) to the strategic depth or regeneration capac-
ities of the Army; and 
(2) to the Army National Guard in its role as 
the combat reserve of the Army. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015’’.
940 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title 
XXIX of this division for military construction projects, 
land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and 
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
curity Investment Program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2017; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2018. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 
Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated 
before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2017; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2018 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing
941 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 
projects. 
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. 
Sec. 2108. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Mili-
tary Academy, New York. 
Sec. 2109. Limitation on funding for family housing construction at Camp Walk-
er, Republic of Korea. 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2103(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ..........................
Concord ........................................................................
$15,200,000 
Fort Irwin ...................................................................
$45,000,000 
Colorado .............................
Fort Carson .................................................................
$89,000,000 
Hawaii ..............................
Fort Shafter .................................................................
$311,400,000 
Kentucky ............................
Blue Grass Army Depot .............................................
$15,000,000 
Fort Campbell .............................................................
$23,000,000 
New York ...........................
Fort Drum ...................................................................
$27,000,000 
Pennsylvania .....................
Letterkenny Army Depot ............................................
$16,000,000
942 
Army: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
South Carolina .................
Fort Jackson ................................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..................................
Fort Hood ....................................................................
$46,000,000 
Virginia .............................
Fort Lee .......................................................................
$86,000,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis .........................................
$7,700,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out the military con-
struction project for the installations or locations outside 
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guantanamo Bay ..............
Guantanamo Bay .........................................................
$23,800,000 
Japan .................................
Kadena Air Base ..........................................................
$10,600,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table:
943 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Illinois ........................
Rock Island ................
Family Housing New 
Construction ..........
$19,500,000 
Korea ..........................
Camp Walker .............
Family Housing New 
Construction ..........
$57,800,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $1,309,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Army as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following:
944 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $226,400,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for a Command and 
Control Facility at Fort Shafter, Hawaii). 
(3) $46,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for a Simulations Cen-
ter at Fort Hood, Texas). 
(4) $86,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for an Advanced Indi-
vidual Training Barracks Complex, Ph 3, at Fort 
Lee, Virginia). 
(5) $6,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for 
cadet barracks at the United States Military Acad-
emy, New York). 
(6) $78,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), as 
amended by section 2105(d) of this Act, for a Secure
945 
Administration/Operations Facility at Fort Belvoir, 
Virginia). 
SEC. 2104. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 
108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jer-
sey, for construction of an Explosives Research and Devel-
opment Loading Facility at the installation, the Secretary 
of the Army may use available unobligated balances of 
amounts appropriated for military construction for the 
Army to complete work on the project within the scope spec-
ified for the project in the justification data provided to 
Congress as part of the request for authorization of the 
project. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECTS. 
(a) FORT DRUM.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—In executing the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 
2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of 
an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation,
946 
the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital con-
tribution to a public or private utility company in 
order for the utility company to extend the utility 
company’s gas line to the installation boundary. 
(2) NO
CHANGE
IN
SCOPE.—The capital con-
tribution under subsection (a) shall not be construed 
as a change in the scope of work under section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(b) FORT LEONARD WOOD.—In the case of the author-
ization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
(division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for 
Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion 
Complex Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the 
Army may construct the Battalion Headquarters with 
classrooms for a unit other than a Global Defense Posture 
Realignment unit. 
(c) FORT MCNAIR.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort 
McNair, District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle 
Storage Building at the installation, the Secretary of the 
Army may construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle stor-
age.
947 
(d) FORT BELVOIR.—The table in section 2101(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) 
is amended in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
by striking ‘‘$94,000,000’’ in the amount column and in-
serting ‘‘$172,000,000’’. 
SEC. 2106. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437) 
and extended by section 2109 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 988), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning ............
Land Acquisition .....
$12,200,000
948 
SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) as 
follows: 
Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning .............
Land Acquisition ......
$5,100,000 
Fort Benning .............
Land Acquisition ......
$25,000,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg .................
Unmanned Aerial Ve-
hicle Maintenance 
Hanger ...................
$54,000,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ...................
Applied Instruction 
Building .................
$8,300,000 
Fort Bliss ...................
Vehicle Maintenance 
Facility ..................
$19,000,000 
Fort Hood ..................
Unmanned Aerial Ve-
hicle Maintenance 
Hanger ...................
$47,000,000 
Virginia ......................
Fort Belvoir ...............
Road and Infrastruc-
ture Improvements 
$25,000,000 
SEC. 2108. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF CADET BAR-
RACKS AT UNITED STATES MILITARY ACAD-
EMY, NEW YORK. 
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the con-
struction of increment 3 of the Cadet Barracks at the 
United States Military Academy, New York, as authorized
949 
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 
112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the Secretary of the Army 
certifies to the congressional defense committees that the 
Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation 
of the MacArthur Long Barracks at the United States Mili-
tary Academy concurrent with assuming beneficial occu-
pancy of the renovated MacArthur Short Barracks at the 
United States Military Academy. 
SEC. 2109. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR FAMILY HOUSING 
CONSTRUCTION AT CAMP WALKER, REPUBLIC 
OF KOREA. 
(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for construction of mili-
tary family housing units at Camp Walker, Republic of 
Korea, may be obligated or expended until 30 days fol-
lowing the delivery of the report required under subsection 
(b). 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, 
the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the 
Commander, U.S. Forces-Korea, shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on future 
military family housing requirements in the Republic
950 
of Korea and potential courses of action for meeting 
those requirements. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under 
paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum— 
(A) identify the number of authorized Com-
mand Sponsored Families, by location, in the 
Republic of Korea; 
(B) validate that the number of authorized 
Command Sponsored Families identified pursu-
ant to subparagraph (A) is necessary for oper-
ational effectiveness; 
(C) identify and validate each key and es-
sential Command Sponsored Family billet re-
quiring on-post housing in the Republic of 
Korea; 
(D) identify and validate the number of au-
thorized Command Sponsored Families in excess 
of key and essential requiring on-post housing in 
the Republic of Korea; 
(E) identify the number and estimated cost 
of on-post family housing units required to sup-
port the validated requirements; 
(F) contain a plan for meeting the on-post 
family housing requirements in the Republic of 
Korea, including the source of funding; and
951 
(G) contain a prioritized list of planned 
military construction projects to be funded with 
Special Measures Agreement funds over the fu-
ture-years defense plan, including a certification 
that each proposed project is a higher priority 
than family housing. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 
projects. 
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project. 
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Yuma ...................................................................
$16,608,000 
California .................
Bridgeport ...........................................................
$16,180,000 
Lemoore ...............................................................
$38,985,000
952 
Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
San Diego ...........................................................
$47,110,000 
District of Columbia 
Naval Support Activity Washington ................
$31,735,000 
Florida .....................
Jacksonville .........................................................
$30,235,000 
Mayport ...............................................................
$20,520,000 
Guam 
Joint Region Marianas ......................................
$50,651,000 
Hawaii 
Kaneohe Bay .......................................................
$53,382,000 
Pearl Harbor ......................................................
$9,698,000 
Maryland ..................
Annapolis ............................................................
$120,112,000 
Indian Head .......................................................
$15,346,000 
Patuxent River ...................................................
$9,860,000 
Nevada ......................
Fallon ..................................................................
$31,262,000 
North Carolina .........
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$50,706,000 
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ..........
$41,588,000 
Pennsylvania ............
Philadelphia ........................................................
$23,985,000 
South Carolina .........
Charleston ...........................................................
$35,716,000 
Virginia ....................
Dahlgren ..............................................................
$27,313,000 
Norfolk .................................................................
$39,274,000 
Portsmouth ..........................................................
$9,743,000 
Quantico ..............................................................
$12,613,000 
Yorktown .............................................................
$26,988,000 
Washington ...............
Bangor .................................................................
$13,833,000 
Bremerton ...........................................................
$16,401,000 
Port Angeles ........................................................
$20,638,000 
Whidbey Island ...................................................
$24,390,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain Island ............
Southwest Asia ..................................................
$27,826,000 
Djibouti ........................
Camp Lemonier .................................................
$9,923,000 
Japan ...........................
Iwakuni ..............................................................
$6,415,000 
Kadena Air Base ...............................................
$19,411,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Futenma ...............
$4,639,000 
Okinawa .............................................................
$35,685,000 
Spain ............................
Rota ....................................................................
$20,233,000
953 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construc-
tion or improvement of family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $472,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $15,940,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Navy as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601.
954 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $90,112,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a Center for Cyber 
Security Studies Building at Annapolis, Maryland). 
(3) $274,099,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for 
an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington). 
(4) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (di-
vision B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2633) for 
ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, Guam.
955 
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS. 
(a) YUMA.—In the case of the authorization contained 
in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for 
construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the 
Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately 
70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a 
taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project pur-
suant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667). 
(b) CAMP PENDELTON.—In the case of the authoriza-
tion contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for 
Camp Pendelton, California, for construction of an Infan-
try Squad Defense Range, the Secretary of the Navy may 
construct up to 9,000 square feet of vehicular bridge using 
amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the au-
thorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act 
(125 Stat. 1667). 
(c) KINGS BAY.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division 
B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay,
956 
Georgia, for construction of a Crab Island Security En-
clave, the Secretary of the Navy may expand the enclave 
fencing system to three layers of fencing and construct two 
elevated fixed fighting positions with associated supporting 
facilities using amounts appropriated for this project pur-
suant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667). 
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 
113–66; 127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for con-
struction of Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy 
may construct 240 square meters of armory, 48 square me-
ters of Safety Officer/Target Storage Building, and 667 
square meters of Range Operations Building using appro-
priations available for the project pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (127 
Stat. 990). 
SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436),
957 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) 
and extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Bahrain ......................
South West Asia ........
Navy Central Com-
mand Ammunition 
Magazines ..............
$89,280,000 
Guam ..........................
Naval Activities, 
Guam .....................
Defense Access Roads 
Improvements ........
$66,730,000 
SEC. 2208. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
958 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...................
Camp Pendelton ........
North Area Waste 
Water Conveyance
$78,271,000 
Camp Pendelton ........
Infantry Squad De-
fense Range ............
$29,187,000 
Twentynine Palms ....
Land Expansion ........
$8,665,000 
Florida .......................
Jacksonville ................
P–8A Hangar Up-
grades .....................
$6,085,000 
Georgia .......................
Kings Bay ..................
Crab Island Security 
Enclave ..................
$52,913,000 
Kings Bay ..................
WRA Land/Water 
Interface .................
$33,150,000 
Maryland ...................
Patuxent River ..........
Aircraft Prototype 
Facility Phase 2 ....
$45,844,000 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
Sec. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 project. 
Sec. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2012 project. 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2302(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
959 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ........................................
Clear Air Force Station ................
$11,500,000 
Arizona ......................................
Luke Air Force Base .....................
$26,800,000 
Guam .........................................
Joint Region Marianas .................
$47,800,000 
Kansas .......................................
McConnell Air Force Base ............
$34,400,000 
Massachusetts ...........................
Hanscom Air Force Base ..............
$13,500,000 
Nevada .......................................
Nellis Air Force Base ....................
$53,900,000 
New Jersey .................................
Joint 
Base 
McGuire-Dix- 
Lakehurst ...................................
$5,900,000 
Oklahoma ...................................
Tinker Air Force Base ..................
$111,000,000 
Texas ..........................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...............
$5,800,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2302(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out the military 
construction project for the installation or location outside 
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
United Kingdom ....................
Royal Air Force Croughton .............
$92,223,000 
SEC. 2302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Air Force as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
960 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $107,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2301(a) of the Military Con-
struction Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of 
Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 992) for the 
CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center at Fort Meade, 
Maryland). 
SEC. 2303. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 
110–181; 122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South 
Carolina, for base infrastructure at that location, the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may acquire fee or lesser real prop-
erty interests in approximately 11.5 acres of land contig-
uous to Shaw Air Force Base for the project using funds
961 
appropriated to the Department of the Air Force for con-
struction in years prior to fiscal year 2015. 
SEC. 2304. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) 
and extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Bahrain ......................
Shaikh Isa Air Base
North Apron Expan-
sion .........................
$45,000,000. 
SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660),
962 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Italy ............................
Sigonella Naval Air 
Station ...................
UAS SATCOM Relay 
Pads and Facility
$15,000,000 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Sec. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 
Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. 
Sec. 2406. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 
2015 projects pending submission of report. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construc-
tion, defense-wide. 
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project.
963 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ...........................................
Fort Huachuca .............................................
$1,871,000 
California .......................................
Camp Pendelton ...........................................
$11,841,000 
Coronado .......................................................
$70,340,000 
Lemoore .........................................................
$52,500,000 
Colorado ..........................................
Peterson Air Force Base ..............................
$15,200,000 
Georgia ...........................................
Hunter Army Airfield .................................
$7,692,000 
Robins Air Force Base ................................
$19,900,000 
Hawaii ...........................................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ..............
$52,900,000 
Kentucky .........................................
Fort Campbell ..............................................
$18,000,000 
Maryland ........................................
Fort Meade ...................................................
$54,207,000 
Joint Base Andrews .....................................
$18,300,000 
Michigan .........................................
Selfridge Air National Guard Base ............
$35,100,000 
Mississippi .....................................
Stennis ..........................................................
$27,547,000 
Nevada ............................................
Fallon ............................................................
$20,241,000 
New Mexico ....................................
Cannon Air Force Base ...............................
$23,333,000 
North Carolina ...............................
Camp Lejeune ...............................................
$52,748,000 
Fort Bragg ....................................................
$93,136,000 
Seymour Johnson AFB ...............................
$8,500,000 
South Carolina ..............................
Beaufort ........................................................
$40,600,000 
South Dakota .................................
Ellsworth Air Force Base ............................
$8,000,000 
Texas ...............................................
Joint Base San Antonio ..............................
$38,300,000 
Virginia ..........................................
Craney Island ...............................................
$36,500,000 
Defense Distribution Depot Richmond .......
$5,700,000 
Fort Belvoir ..................................................
$7,239,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ..........................
$41,200,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- 
Story .........................................................
$39,588,000 
Pentagon .......................................................
$15,100,000 
CONUS Classified .........................
Classified Location .......................................
$53,073,000
964 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Australia .........................
Geraldton .....................................................................
$9,600,000 
Belgium ...........................
Brussels ........................................................................
$79,544,000 
Guantanamo Bay ...........
Guantanamo Bay ........................................................
$76,290,000 
Japan ..............................
Misawa Air Base .........................................................
$37,775,000 
Okinawa .......................................................................
$170,901,000 
Sasebo ...........................................................................
$37,681,000 
SEC. 
2402. 
AUTHORIZED 
ENERGY 
CONSERVATION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table:
965 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ...............................
Edwards Air Force Base ..................
$4,500,000 
Fort Hunter Liggett .........................
$13,500,000 
Vandenberg Air Force Base .............
$2,965,000 
Colorado .................................
Fort Carson .......................................
$3,000,000 
Florida ....................................
Eglin Air Force Base .......................
$3,850,000 
Georgia ...................................
Moody Air Force Base ......................
$3,600,000 
Hawaii ...................................
Marine Corps Base Hawaii .............
$8,460,000 
Illinois ....................................
Great Lakes Naval Station ..............
$2,190,000 
Maine ......................................
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard ............
$2,740,000 
Maryland ................................
Fort Detrick .......................................
$2,100,000 
Nebraska .................................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$2,869,000 
Oklahoma ...............................
Tinker Air Force Base ......................
$3,609,000 
Oregon ....................................
Oregon City Armory .........................
$9,400,000 
Utah ........................................
Dugway Proving Ground .................
$15,400,000 
Virginia ..................................
Naval Station Norfolk ......................
$11,360,000 
Pentagon ............................................
$2,120,000 
Various Locations ..................
Various Locations .............................
$25,112,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for energy conserva-
tion projects outside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may 
carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 
of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or loca-
tions outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Diego Garcia ..........................
Naval Support Facility ....................
$14,620,000 
Japan .....................................
Fleet Activities Yokosuka ..................
$8,030,000 
Germany .................................
Spangdahlem .....................................
$4,800,000 
Various Locations ..................
Various Locations .............................
$5,776,000 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
966 
ning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of Defense (other than the military depart-
ments) as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $79,000 (the balance of the amount author-
ized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 
B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW 
Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, Maryland). 
(3) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2129) for 
the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at 
Deveselu, Romania).
967 
(4) $141,039,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672), as 
amended by section 2404(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 
B Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2130), for a data 
center at Fort Meade, Maryland). 
(5) $50,500,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for 
an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, 
Maryland). 
(6) $54,300,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for 
an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base San Anto-
nio, Texas). 
(7) $526,168,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (di-
vision B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673) for
968 
a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Ger-
many). 
(8) $281,325,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (di-
vision B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2640) for 
a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas). 
(9) $123,827,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide 
project by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations 
Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) for 
a data center at Camp Williams, Utah). 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows:
969 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
District of Columbia
Bolling Air Force 
Base ........................
Cooling Tower Ex-
pansion ..................
$2,070,000 
DIAC Parking Ga-
rage .........................
$13,586,000 
Electrical Upgrades ...
$1,080,000 
SEC. 2405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...................
Coronado ....................
SOF Support Activ-
ity Operations Fa-
cility .......................
$42,000,000 
Germany ....................
USAG Baumholder ...
Wetzel-Smith Elemen-
tary School ............
$59,419,000 
Italy ............................
USAG Vicenza ...........
Vicenza High School
$41,864,000 
Japan .........................
Yokota Air Base ........
Yokota High School ...
$49,606,000 
Virginia ......................
Pentagon Reservation 
Heliport Control 
Tower and Fire 
Station ...................
$6,457,000 
Pedestrian Plaza .......
$2,285,000
970 
SEC. 2406. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO 
CARRY 
OUT 
CERTAIN 
FISCAL 
YEAR 
2015 
PROJECTS PENDING SUBMISSION OF RE-
PORT. 
(a) LIMITATION.—No amounts may be obligated or ex-
pended for the military construction projects described in 
subsection (b) and otherwise authorized by section 2401(a) 
until the report described in subsection (c) has been sub-
mitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 
and the House of Representatives. 
(b) COVERED PROJECTS.—The limitation imposed by 
subsection (a) applies to the following military construction 
projects: 
(1) The construction of a human performance 
center facility at Joint Expeditionary Base Little 
Creek–Story, Virginia. 
(2) The construction of a squadron operations fa-
cility at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. 
(c) REPORT DESCRIBED.—The report referred to in 
subsection (a) is the report on the review of Department 
of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among 
members of United States Special Operations Forces and 
their dependents required by section 582 of this Act.
971 
Subtitle B—Chemical 
Demilitarization Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEM-
ICAL 
DEMILITARIZATION 
CONSTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2014, for military construction 
and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as spec-
ified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under subsection (a) and the 
project described in paragraph (2) of this subsection may 
not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $2,049,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized for ammunition demilitarization at Blue 
Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113
972 
Stat. 835), as most recently amended by section 2412 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011 (division B Public Law 111–383; 
124 Stat. 4450) and section 2412 of this Act. 
SEC. 2412. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), 
as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 
(division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 
2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army 
Depot, Kentucky, by striking ‘‘$746,000,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$780,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$1,237,920,000’’.
973 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2405(b)(3) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), 
as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 
(division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 
2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is further amended by 
striking ‘‘$723,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$757,200,000’’. 
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC 
TREATY ORGANIZATION SE-
CURITY 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum
974 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construc-
tion previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for contribu-
tions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 
10, United States Code, for the share of the United States 
of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation Security Investment Program authorized by section 
2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 
land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
Sec. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal 
year 2012 projects. 
Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 
projects. 
Sec. 2613. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project. 
Sec. 2614. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 projects.
975 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations 
and Authorization of Appropria-
tions 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available 
for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Army National Guard locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Delaware ............................
Dagsboro ........................................................................
$10,800,000 
Maine .................................
Augusta ..........................................................................
$32,000,000 
Maryland ...........................
Havre De Grace ............................................................
$12,400,000 
Montana ............................
Helena ............................................................................
$38,000,000 
New Mexico .......................
Alamogordo ....................................................................
$5,000,000 
North Dakota ....................
Valley City .....................................................................
$10,800,000 
Vermont .............................
North Hyde Park ..........................................................
$4,400,000 
Washington ........................
Yakima ...........................................................................
$19,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available 
for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army
976 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ................................
Fresno ......................................................................
$22,000,000 
March Air Force Base ............................................
$25,000,000 
Colorado ...................................
Fort Carson .............................................................
$5,000,000 
Illinois .....................................
Arlington Heights ...................................................
$26,000,000 
Mississippi ...............................
Starkville .................................................................
$9,300,000 
New Jersey ...............................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ......................
$26,000,000 
New York .................................
Mattydale .................................................................
$23,000,000 
Virginia ...................................
Fort Lee ...................................................................
$16,000,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available 
for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the Navy 
Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......................
Pittsburgh .................................................
$17,650,000 
Washington .........................
Naval Station Everett .............................
$47,869,000 
Whidbey Island ........................................
$27,755,000
977 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available 
for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real prop-
erty and carry out military construction projects for the 
Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and 
in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Arkansas ..............................
Fort Smith Municipal Airport ...............
$13,200,000 
Connecticut ........................
Bradley International Airport ................
$16,306,000 
Iowa ...................................
Des Moines Municipal Airport ...............
$8,993,000 
Michigan ............................
W.K. Kellog Regional Airport .................
$6,000,000 
New Hampshire ..................
Pease International Trade Port ..............
$41,902,000 
Pennsylvania ......................
Horsham Air Guard Station (Willow 
Grove) ...................................................
$5,662,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available 
for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real prop-
erty and carry out military construction projects for the 
Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and 
in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Arizona ................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ..............
$14,500,000 
Georgia ...............................
Robins Air Force Base ............................
$27,700,000 
North Carolina ...................
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base ..........
$9,800,000
978 
Air Force Reserve—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Texas ....................................
Forth Worth ..............................................
$3,700,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2014, for the costs of acquisition, 
architectural and engineering services, and construction of 
facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for con-
tributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United 
States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for 
those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under sections 2601 through 2605 
of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
(2) $10,800,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2601 for a National Guard Ve-
hicle Maintenance Shop at Dagsboro, Delaware).
979 
(3) $19,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2601 for an Enlisted Barracks, 
Transient Training at Yakima, Washington). 
(4) $26,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2602 for an Army Reserve 
Center at Arlington Heights, Illinois). 
(5) $9,300,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2602 for an Army Reserve 
Center at Starkville, Mississippi). 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY 
TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 
PROJECTS. 
(a) KANSAS CITY.— 
(1) MODIFICATION.—In the case of the authoriza-
tion contained in the table in section 2602 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 
Stat. 1678), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction 
of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Sec-
retary of the Army may, instead of constructing a 
new facility in Kansas City, construct a new facility 
in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas. 
(2) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding 
section 2002 of the Military Construction Authoriza-
980 
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set 
forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until Oc-
tober 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2016, whichever is later. 
(b) ATTLEBORO.— 
(1) MODIFICATION.—In the case of the authoriza-
tion contained in the table in section 2602 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 
Stat. 1678), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for construc-
tion of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the 
Secretary of the Army may, instead of constructing a 
new facility in Attleboro, construct a new facility in 
the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts. 
(2) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding 
section 2002 of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set 
forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until Oc-
tober 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2016, whichever is later.
981 
SEC. 2612. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECTS. 
(a) STORMVILLE.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 
B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2133) for Stormville, 
New York, for construction of a Combined Support Mainte-
nance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of the Army may instead 
construct the facility at Camp Smith, New York, and build 
a 53,760 square foot maintenance facility in lieu of a 
75,156 square foot maintenance facility. 
(b) TUSTIN.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 
of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Tustin, Cali-
fornia, for construction of an Army Reserve Center, the Sec-
retary of the Army may construct the facility in the vicin-
ity of Tustin instead of constructing the facility in Tustin. 
SEC. 2613. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 
The table in section 2604 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2014 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1002) is amended in the item 
relating to Martin State Airport, Maryland, for construc-
tion of a CYBER/ISR Facility by striking ‘‘$8,000,000’’ 
in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$12,900,000’’.
1185 
(ii) the decades of the service of John 
H. Chafee to the people of Rhode Island and 
the United States. 
(B) MEMORIAL.—The Secretary shall dis-
play a memorial at an appropriate location in 
the Park that recognizes the role of John H. 
Chafee in preserving the resources of the Black-
stone River Valley for the people of the United 
States. 
SEC. 3032. COLTSVILLE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) CITY.—The term ‘‘city’’ means the city of 
Hartford, Connecticut. 
(2) 
COMMISSION.—The 
term 
‘‘Commission’’ 
means the Coltsville National Historical Park Advi-
sory Commission established by subsection (k)(1). 
(3) HISTORIC
DISTRICT.—The term ‘‘Historic 
District’’ means the Coltsville Historic District. 
(4) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map enti-
tled ‘‘Coltsville National Historical Park—Proposed 
Boundary’’, numbered T25/102087, and dated May 
11, 2010. 
(5) 
PARK.—The 
term 
‘‘park’’ 
means 
the 
Coltsville National Historical Park in the State of 
Connecticut.