104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1530
AN ACT
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military
activities of the Department of Defense, for military
construction, and for defense activities of the Depart-
ment of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for
such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996’’.
SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF
CONTENTS.
(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into three divi-
sions as follows:
(1) Division A—Department of Defense Au-
thorizations.
(2) Division B—Military Construction Author-
izations.
(3) Division C—Department of Energy Na-
tional Security Authorizations and Other Authoriza-
tions.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for
this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees defined.
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Army.
Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps.
Sec. 103. Air Force.
Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities.
Sec. 105. Reserve components.
Sec. 106. Chemical demilitarization program.
Subtitle B—Army Programs
Sec. 111. Procurement of helicopters.
Sec. 112. Repeal of requirements for armored vehicle upgrades.
Subtitle C—Navy Programs
Sec. 131. Repeal of prohibition on backfit of Trident submarines.
Sec. 132. Repeal of limitation on total cost for SSN–21 and SSN–22 Seawolf
submarines.
Sec. 133. Competition required for selection of shipyards for construction of
vessels for next generation attack submarine program.
Sec. 134. Sonobuoy programs.
Subtitle D—Air Force Programs
Sec. 141. Repeal of limitations.
Subtitle E—Chemical Demilitarization Program
Sec. 151. Repeal of requirement to proceed expeditiously with development of
chemical demilitarization cryofracture facility at Tooele Army
Depot, Utah.
Sec. 152. Sense of Congress regarding cost growth in program for destruction
of the existing stockpile of lethal chemical agents and muni-
tions.
Sec. 153. Assistance for chemical weapons stockpile communities affected by
base closure.
TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND
EVALUATION
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 202. Amount for basic research and exploratory development.
Sec. 203. Modifications to Strategic Environmental Research and Development
Program.
Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and
Limitations
Sec. 211. Space launch modernization.
Sec. 212. Maneuver variant unmanned aerial vehicle.
Sec. 213. Tactical manned reconnaissance.
Sec. 214. Advanced lithography program.
Sec. 215. Enhanced fiber optic guided missile system.
Sec. 216. Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program.
Sec. 217. Development of laser program.
Subtitle C—Ballistic Missile Defense Act of 1995
Sec. 231. Short title.
Sec. 232. Ballistic missile defense policy of the United States.
Sec. 233. Implementation of policy.
Sec. 234. Follow-on technologies research and development.
Sec. 235. Policy on compliance with the ABM Treaty.
Sec. 236. Ballistic missile defense program accountability.
Sec. 237. ABM Treaty defined.
Sec. 238. Repeal of Missile Defense Act of 1991.
Subtitle D—Other Ballistic Missile Defense Provisions
Sec. 241. Ballistic missile defense funding for fiscal year 1996.
Sec. 242. Policy concerning ballistic missile defense.
Sec. 243. Testing of theater missile defense interceptors.
Sec. 244. Repeal of missile defense provisions.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 251. Allocation of funds for medical countermeasures against biowarfare
threats.
Sec. 252. Analysis of consolidation of basic research accounts of military de-
partments.
Sec. 253. Change in reporting period from calendar year to fiscal year for an-
nual report on certain contracts to colleges and universities.
Sec. 254. Modification to University Research Initiative Support Program.
Sec. 255. Advanced Field Artillery System (Crusader).
Sec. 256. Review of C4I by National Research Council.
Sec. 257. Five-year plan for federally funded research and development centers
(FFRDCs).
Sec. 258. Manufacturing technology program.
Sec. 259. Five-year plan for consolidation of defense laboratories and test and
evaluation centers.
Sec. 260. Aeronautical research and test capabilities assessment.
Sec. 261. Limitation on T–38 Avionics Upgrade Program.
Sec. 262. Cross reference to congressional defense policy concerning national
technology and industrial base, reinvestment, and conversion in
operation of defense research and development programs.
Sec. 263. Demilitarization of conventional munitions, rockets, and explosives.
Sec. 264. Fiber optic acoustic sensor system.
Sec. 265. Joint targeting support system testbed.
TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.
Sec. 302. Working capital funds.
Sec. 303. Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 304. Office of Economic Adjustment.
Subtitle B—Defense Business Operations Fund
Sec. 311. Codification of Defense Business Operations Fund.
Sec. 312. Retention of centralized management of Defense Business Operations
Fund and prohibition on further expansion of Fund.
Sec. 313. Charges for goods and services provided through Defense Business
Operations Fund and termination of advance billing practices.
Sec. 314. Annual proposed budget for operation of Defense Business Oper-
ations Fund.
Sec. 315. Reduction in requests for transportation funded through Defense
Business Operations Fund.
Subtitle C—Environmental Provisions
Sec. 321. Clarification of services and property that may be exchanged to bene-
fit the historical collection of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 322. Addition of amounts creditable to Defense Environmental Restoration
Account.
Sec. 323. Repeal of certain environmental education programs.
Sec. 324. Repeal of limitation on obligation of amounts transferred from envi-
ronmental restoration transfer account.
Sec. 325. Elimination of authority to transfer amounts for toxicological profiles.
Sec. 326. Sense of Congress on use of Defense Environmental Restoration Ac-
count.
Subtitle D—Civilian Employees and Nonappropriated Fund
Instrumentality Employees
Sec. 331. Management of Department of Defense civilian personnel.
Sec. 332. Management of depot employees.
Sec. 333. Conversion to performance by civilian employees of active-duty posi-
tions.
Sec. 334. Personnel actions involving employees of nonappropriated fund in-
strumentalities.
Sec. 335. Limitation on provision of overseas living quarters allowances for
nonappropriated fund instrumentality employees.
Sec. 336. Overtime exemption for nonappropriated fund employees.
Sec. 337. Continued health insurance coverage.
Sec. 338. Creditability of certain NAFI service under the Federal Employees’
Retirement System.
Subtitle E—Commissaries and Nonappropriated Fund
Instrumentalities
Sec. 341. Operation of commissary store system.
Sec. 342. Pricing policies for commissary store merchandise.
Sec. 343. Limited release of commissary stores sales information to manufac-
turers, distributors, and other vendors doing business with De-
fense Commissary Agency.
Sec. 344. Economical distribution of distilled spirits by nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities.
Sec. 345. Transportation by commissaries and exchanges to overseas locations.
Sec. 346. Demonstration program for uniform funding of morale, welfare, and
recreation activities at certain military installations.
Sec. 347. Continued operation of base exchange mart at Fort Worth Naval Air
Station and authority to expand base exchange mart program.
Sec. 348. Uniform deferred payments program for military exchanges.
Sec. 349. Availability of funds to offset expenses incurred by Army and Air
Force Exchange Service on account of troop reductions in Eu-
rope.
Sec. 350. Study regarding improving efficiencies in operation of military ex-
changes and other morale, welfare, and recreation activities
and commissary stores.
Sec. 351. Extension of deadline for conversion of Navy ships’ stores to oper-
ation as nonappropriated fund instrumentalities.
Subtitle F—Contracting Out
Sec. 357. Procurement of electricity from most economical source.
Sec. 358. Procurement of certain commodities from most economical source.
Sec. 359. Commercial procurement of printing and duplication services.
Sec. 360. Direct delivery of assorted consumable inventory items of Department
of Defense.
Sec. 361. Private operation of functions of Defense Reutilization and Marketing
Service.
Sec. 362. Private operation of payroll functions of Department of Defense for
payment of civilian employees.
Sec. 363. Demonstration program to identify underdeductions and overpay-
ments made to vendors.
Sec. 364. Pilot program to evaluate potential for private operation of overseas
dependents’ schools.
Sec. 365. Pilot program for evaluation of improved defense travel processing
prototypes.
Sec. 366. Pilot program for private operation of consolidated information tech-
nology functions of Department of Defense.
Sec. 367. Increased reliance on the private sector.
Sec. 368. Pilot program for private operation of payroll and accounting func-
tions of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities.
Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Reviews, Studies, and Reports
Sec. 371. Quarterly readiness reports.
Sec. 372. Reports required regarding expenditures for emergency and extraor-
dinary expenses.
Sec. 373. Restatement of requirement for semiannual reports to Congress on
transfers from high-priority readiness appropriations.
Sec. 374. Modification of notification requirement regarding use of core logis-
tics functions waiver.
Sec. 375. Limitation on development or modernization of automated informa-
tion systems of Department of Defense pending report.
Sec. 376. Report regarding reduction of costs associated with contract manage-
ment oversight.
Subtitle H—Other Matters
Sec. 381. Prohibition on capital lease for Defense Business Management Uni-
versity.
Sec. 382. Authority of Inspector General over investigations of procurement
fraud.
Sec. 383. Provision of equipment and facilities to assist in emergency response
actions.
Sec. 384. Conversion of the Civilian Marksmanship Program to a federally
chartered nonprofit corporation.
Sec. 385. Personnel services and logistical support for certain activities held on
military installations.
Sec. 386. Retention of monetary awards.
Sec. 387. Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
Sec. 388. Permanent authority regarding use of proceeds from sale of lost,
abandoned, and unclaimed personal property at certain instal-
lations.
Sec. 389. Transfer of excess personal property to support law enforcement ac-
tivities.
Sec. 390. Development and implementation of innovative processes to improve
operation and maintenance.
Sec. 391. Review of use of Defense Logistics Agency to manage inventory con-
trol points.
Sec. 392. Sale of 50 percent of current war reserve fuel stocks.
Sec. 393. Military clothing sales stores, replacement sales.
Sec. 394. Assistance to local educational agencies that benefit dependents of
members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense ci-
vilian employees.
Sec. 395. Core logistics capabilities of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 396. Expansion of Southwest Border States Anti-Drug Information Sys-
tem.
TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A—Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Temporary variations in DOPMA authorized end strength limitations
for active duty Navy and Air Force officers in certain grades.
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves.
Sec. 413. Counting of certain active component personnel assigned in support
of Reserve component training.
Subtitle C—Military Training Student Loads
Sec. 421. Authorization of training student loads.
Subtitle D—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 431. Authorization of appropriations for military personnel.
Sec. 432. Authorization for increase in active-duty end strengths.
TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy
Sec. 501. Authority to extend transition period for officers selected for early re-
tirement.
Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Reserve Components
Sec. 511. Military technician full-time support program for Army and Air
Force reserve components.
Sec. 512. Military leave for military reserve technicians for certain duty over-
seas.
Sec. 513. Revisions to Army Guard combat reform initiative to include Army
reserve under certain provisions and make certain revisions.
Sec. 514. ROTC scholarships for the National Guard.
Sec. 515. Report on feasibility of providing education benefits protection insur-
ance for service academy and ROTC scholarship students who
become medically unable to serve.
Sec. 516. Active duty officers detailed to ROTC duty at senior military colleges
to serve as Commandant and Assistant Commandant of Cadets
and as tactical officers.
Sec. 517. Mobilization income insurance program for members of Ready Re-
serve.
Sec. 518. Delay in reorganization of Army ROTC regional headquarters struc-
ture.
Sec. 519. Active duty associaate unit responsibility.
Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Force Levels
Sec. 521. Floor on end strengths.
Sec. 522. Army officer manning levels.
Sec. 523. Comptroller General review of proposed Army end strength alloca-
tions.
Sec. 524. Manning status of highly deployable support units.
Sec. 525. Sense of Congress concerning personnel tempo rates.
Subtitle D—Amendments to the Uniform Code of Military
Justice
Sec. 541. References to Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 542. Forfeiture of pay and allowances during confinement by sentence of
court-martial.
Sec. 543. Refusal to testify before court-martial.
Sec. 544. Flight from apprehension.
Sec. 545. Carnal knowledge.
Sec. 546. Time after accession for initial instruction in the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
Sec. 547. Persons who may appear before the United States Court of Appeals
for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 548. Discretionary representation by Government appellate defense counsel
in petitioning Supreme Court for writ of certiorari.
Sec. 549. Repeal of termination of authority for Chief Justice of United States
to designate Article III judges for temporary service on Court
of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 550. Technical amendment.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 551. Equalization of accrual of service credit for officers and enlisted
members.
Sec. 552. Extension of expiring personnel authorities.
Sec. 553. Increase in educational assistance allowance with respect to skills or
specialties for which there is a critical shortage of personnel.
Sec. 554. Amendments to education loan repayment programs.
Sec. 555. Recognition by States of living wills of members, certain former mem-
bers, and their dependents.
Sec. 556. Transitional compensation for dependents of members of the Armed
Forces separated for dependent abuse.
Sec. 557. Army ranger training.
Sec. 558. Repeal of certain civil-military programs.
Sec. 559. Eligibility for Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal based upon service
in El Salvador.
Sec. 560. Revision and codification of Military Family Act and Military Child
Care Act.
Sec. 561. Discharge of members of the Armed Forces who have the HIV–1
virus.
Sec. 562. Authority to appoint Brigadier General Charles E. Yeager, United
States Air Forces (retired) to the grade of major general on
the retired list.
Sec. 563. Determination of whereabouts and status of missing persons.
Sec. 564. Nominations to service academies from Commonwealth of the North-
ern Marianas Islands.
Sec. 565. Report on the consistency of reporting of fingerprint cards and final
disposition forms to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Sec. 566. Separation benefits during force reduction for officers of commis-
sioned corps of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion.
TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL
BENEFITS
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Military pay raise for fiscal year 1996.
Sec. 602. Limitation on basic allowance for subsistence for members without
dependents residing in Government quarters.
Sec. 603. Authorization of payment of basic allowance for quarters to addi-
tional members assigned to sea duty.
Sec. 604. Establishment of minimum amounts of variable housing allowance for
high housing cost areas and additional limitation on reduction
of allowance for certain members.
Sec. 605. Clarification of limitation on receipt of family separation allowance.
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. Extension of certain bonuses for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. Extension of certain bonuses and special pay for nurse officer can-
didates, registered nurses, and nurse anesthetists.
Sec. 613. Extension of authority relating to payment of other bonuses and spe-
cial pays.
Sec. 614. Codification and extension of special pay for critically short wartime
health specialists in the Selected Reserves.
Sec. 615. Change in eligibility requirements for continuous monthly aviation in-
centive pay.
Sec. 616. Continuous entitlement to career sea pay for crewmembers of ships
designated as tenders.
Sec. 617. Increase in maximum rate of special duty assignment pay for enlisted
members serving as recruiters.
Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances
Sec. 621. Authorization of return to United States of formerly dependent chil-
dren of members.
Sec. 622. Authorization of dislocation allowance for moves in connection with
base realignments and closures.
.Sec. 623. Repeal of prohibition on payment of lodging expenses when adequate
Government quarters are available.
Subtitle D—Other Matters
Sec. 631. Elimination of unnecessary annual reporting requirements regarding
compensation matters.
Sec. 632. Study regarding joint process for determining location of recruiting
stations.
Sec. 633. Elimination of disparity between effective dates for military and civil-
ian retiree cost-of-living adjustments for fiscal year 1996.
TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS
Subtitle A—Health Care Services
Sec. 701. Modification of requirements regarding routine physical examinations
and immunizations under CHAMPUS.
Sec. 702. Correction of inequities in medical and dental care and death and dis-
ability benefits for certain Reservists.
Sec. 703. Medical and dental care for members of the Selected Reserve.
Subtitle B—TRICARE Program
Sec. 711. Priority use of military treatment facilities for persons enrolled in
managed care initiatives.
Sec. 712. Staggered payment of enrollment fees for TRICARE.
Sec. 713. Requirement of budget neutrality for TRICARE to be based on entire
program.
Sec. 714. Training in health care management and administration for
TRICARE lead agents.
Sec. 715. Evaluation and report on TRICARE effectiveness.
Subtitle C—Uniformed Services Treatment Facilities
Sec. 721. Limitation on expenditures to support Uniformed Services Treatment
Facilities and limitation on number of participants in USTF
managed care plans.
Sec. 722. Application of Federal acquisition regulation to participation agree-
ments with Uniformed Services Treatment Facilities.
Sec. 723. Development of plan for integrating Uniformed Services Treatment
Facilities in managed care programs of Department of De-
fense.
Sec. 724. Equitable implementation of uniform cost sharing requirements for
Uniformed Services Treatment Facilities.
Subtitle D—Other Changes to Existing Laws Regarding
Health Care Management
Sec. 731. Maximum allowable payments to individual health-care providers
under CHAMPUS.
Sec. 732. Expansion of existing restriction on use of defense funds for abor-
tions.
Sec. 733. Identification of third-party payer situations.
Sec. 734. Redesignation of Military Health Care Account as Defense Health
Program Account and two-year availability of certain Account
funds.
Sec. 735. Expansion of financial assistance program for health-care profes-
sionals in reserve components to include dental specialties.
Sec. 736. Elimination of unnecessary annual reporting requirements regarding
military health care.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 741. Termination of program to train and utilize military psychologists to
prescribe psychotropic medications.
Sec. 742. Waiver of collection of payments due from certain persons unaware
of loss of CHAMPUS eligibility.
Sec. 743. Notification of certain CHAMPUS covered beneficiaries of loss of
CHAMPUS eligibility.
Sec. 744. Demonstration program to train military medical personnel in civilian
shock trauma units.
Sec. 745. Study regarding Department of Defense efforts to determine appro-
priate force levels of wartime medical personnel.
Sec. 746. Study regarding expanded mental health services for certain covered
beneficiaries.
Sec. 747. Report on improved access to military health care for covered bene-
ficiaries entitled to Medicare.
Sec. 748. Sense of Congress on continuity of health care services for covered
beneficiaries adversely affected by closures of military medical
treatment facilities.
TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION
MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS
Subtitle A—Competition
Sec. 801. Competition provisions.
Sec. 802. Preaward debriefings.
Sec. 803. Contract types.
Subtitle B—Commercial Items
Sec. 811. Commercial item exception to requirement for cost or pricing data
and information limitations.
Sec. 812. Application of simplified procedures to commercial items.
Sec. 813. Amendment to definition of commercial items.
Sec. 814. Inapplicability of cost accounting standards to contracts and sub-
contracts for commercial items.
Subtitle C—Additional Reform Provisions
Sec. 821. Repeals of certain procurement provisions.
Sec. 822. Fees for certain testing services.
Sec. 823. Testing of defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 824. Coordination and communication of defense research activities.
Sec. 825. Addition of certain items to domestic source limitation.
Sec. 826. Revisions to procurement notice provisions.
Sec. 827. Encouragement of use of leasing authority.
Sec. 828. Government reliance on the private sector.
Sec. 829. Elimination of certain certification requirements.
Sec. 830. Amendment to commencement and expiration of authority to conduct
certain tests of procurement procedures.
Sec. 831. Procurement integrity.
Sec. 832. Further acquisition streamlining provisions.
Sec. 833. Justification of major defense acquisition programs not meeting
goals.
Sec. 834. Enhanced performance incentives for acquisition workforce.
Sec. 835. Results oriented acquisition program cycle.
Sec. 836. Rapid contracting goal.
Sec. 837. Encouragement of multiyear contracting.
Sec. 838. Contractor share of gains and losses from cost, schedule, and per-
formance experience.
Sec. 839. Phase funding of defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 840. Improved Department of Defense contract payment procedures.
Sec. 841. Consideration of past performance in assignment to acquisition posi-
tions.
Sec. 842. Value engineering for Federal agencies.
Sec. 843. Acquisition workforce.
Sec. 844. Cost reimbursement rules for indirect costs attributable to private
sector work of defense contractors.
Subtitle D—Streamlining of Dispute Resolution
PART I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 850. Definitions.
PART II—ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BOARD OF
CONTRACT APPEALS
Sec. 851. Establishment.
Sec. 852. Membership.
Sec. 853. Chairman.
Sec. 854. Rulemaking authority.
Sec. 855. Litigation authority.
Sec. 856. Seal of Board.
Sec. 857. Authorization of appropriations.
PART III—FUNCTIONS OF UNITED STATES BOARD OF CONTRACT
APPEALS
Sec. 861. Alternative dispute resolution services.
Sec. 862. Alternative dispute resolution of disputes and protests submitted to
Board.
Sec. 863. Contract disputes.
Sec. 864. Protests.
Sec. 865. Applicability to contracts for commercial items.
PART IV—REPEAL OF OTHER STATUTES AUTHORIZING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROTESTS
Sec. 871. Repeals.
PART V—TRANSFERS AND TRANSITIONAL, SAVINGS, AND
CONFORMING PROVISIONS
Sec. 881. Transfer and allocation of appropriations and personnel.
Sec. 882. Terminations and savings provisions.
Sec. 883. Contract dispute authority of Board.
Sec. 884. References to agency boards of contract appeals.
Sec. 885. Conforming amendments.
PART VI—EFFECTIVE DATE; INTERIM APPOINTMENT AND RULES
Sec. 891. Effective date.
Sec. 892. Interim appointment.
Sec. 893. Interim rules.
Subtitle E—Effective Dates and Implementation
Sec. 895. Effective date and applicability.
Sec. 896. Implementing regulations.
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION
AND MANAGEMENT
Sec. 901. Reorganization of Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 902. Restructuring of Department of Defense acquisition organization and
workforce.
Sec. 903. Plan for incorporation of Department of Energy national security
functions in Department of Defense.
Sec. 904. Change in titles of certain Marine Corps general officer billets result-
ing from reorganization of the Headquarters, Marine Corps.
Sec. 905. Inclusion of Information Resources Management College in the Na-
tional Defense University.
Sec. 906. Employment of civilians at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Stud-
ies.
Sec. 907. Continued operation of Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences.
Sec. 908. Redesignation of Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Sec. 909. Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.
Sec. 910. Aviation testing consolidation.
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A—Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. Transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Incorporation of Classified Annex.
Sec. 1003. Improved funding mechanisms for unbudgeted operations.
Sec. 1004. Designation and liability of disbursing and certifying officials.
Sec. 1005. Authority for obligation of certain unauthorized fiscal year 1995 de-
fense appropriations.
Sec. 1006. Authorization of prior emergency supplemental appropriations for
fiscal year 1995.
Sec. 1007. Prohibition of incremental funding of procurement items.
Subtitle B—Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Contract options for LMSR vessels.
Sec. 1022. Vessels subject to repair under phased maintenance contracts.
Sec. 1023. Clarification of requirements relating to repairs of vessels.
Sec. 1024. Naming of naval vessel.
Sec. 1025. Transfer of riverine patrol craft.
Subtitle C—Other Matters
Sec. 1031. Termination and modification of authorities regarding national de-
fense technology and industrial base, defense reinvestment, and
defense conversion programs.
Sec. 1032. Repeal of miscellaneous provisions of law.
Sec. 1033. Policy concerning excess defense industrial capacity.
Sec. 1034. ROTC access to campuses.
Sec. 1035. Application of Buy American Act principles.
TITLE XI—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION WITH
STATES OF FORMER SOVIET UNION
Sec. 1101. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
Sec. 1102. Fiscal year 1996 authorization.
Sec. 1103. Repeal of demilitarization enterprise fund authority.
Sec. 1104. Prohibition on use of funds for peacekeeping exercises and related
activities with Russia.
Sec. 1105. Revision to authority for assistance for weapons destruction.
Sec. 1106. Prior notice to Congress of obligation of funds.
Sec. 1107. Report on accounting for United States assistance.
Sec. 1108. Limitation on Cooperative Threat Reduction program relating to of-
fensive biological weapons program in Russia.
TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO OTHER NATIONS
Subtitle A—Peacekeeping Provisions
Sec. 1201. Limitation on expenditure of Department of Defense funds for Unit-
ed States forces placed under United Nations command or con-
trol.
Sec. 1202. Limitation on use of Department of Defense funds for United
States share of costs of United Nations peacekeeping activities.
Subtitle B—Humanitarian Assistance Programs
Sec. 1211. Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid programs.
Sec. 1212. Humanitarian assistance.
Sec. 1213. Landmine clearance program.
Subtitle C—Other Matters
Sec. 1221. Revision of definition of landmine for purposes of landmine export
moratorium.
Sec. 1222. Extension and amendment of counterproliferation authorities.
Sec. 1223. Prohibition on use of funds for activities associated with the United
States-People’s Republic of China Joint Defense Conversion
Commission.
Sec. 1224. Defense export loan guarantees.
Sec. 1225. Accounting for burdensharing contributions.
Sec. 1226. Authority to accept contributions for expenses of relocation within
host nation of United States Armed Forces overseas.
Sec. 1227. Sense of Congress on ABM treaty violations.
Sec. 1228. Reduction of United States military forces in Europe.
Sec. 1229. Sense of Congress concerning unilateral implementation of Start II
Treaty.
Sec. 1230. Sense of the Congress regarding the Chemical Weapons Convention.
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 2001. Short title.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
TITLE XXII—NAVY
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Retention of accrued interest on funds deposited for construction of
family housing, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois.
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2402. Family housing private investment.
Sec. 2403. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2404. Energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2405. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2406. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 1995 projects.
Sec. 2407. Limitation on expenditures for construction project at Umatilla
Army Depot, Oregon.
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
Sec. 2601. Authorized Guard and Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2602. Correction in authorized uses of funds for Army National Guard
projects in Mississippi.
TITLE XXVII—EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION OF
AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 2701. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified
by law.
Sec. 2702. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 1993 projects.
Sec. 2703. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 1992 projects.
Sec. 2704. Effective date.
TITLE XXVIII—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military
Family Housing Changes
Sec. 2801. Alternative means of acquiring and improving military family hous-
ing and supporting facilities for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 2802. Inclusion of other Armed Forces in Navy program of limited part-
nerships with private developers for military housing.
Sec. 2803. Special unspecified minor construction thresholds for projects to cor-
rect life, health, and safety deficiencies and clarification of un-
specified minor construction authority.
Sec. 2804. Disposition of amounts recovered as a result of damage to real prop-
erty.
Sec. 2805. Rental of family housing in foreign countries.
Sec. 2806. Pilot program to provide interest rate buy down authority on loans
for housing within housing shortage areas at military installa-
tions.
Subtitle B—Base Closure and Realignment
Sec. 2811. Authority to transfer property at military installations to be closed
to persons who construct or provide military family housing.
Sec. 2812. Deposit of proceeds from leases of property located at installations
being closed or realigned.
Sec. 2813. Agreements for certain services at installations being closed.
Sec. 2814. Removal of base closure properties from application of section 501
of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act.
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances Generally
Sec. 2821. Transfer of jurisdiction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Sec. 2822. Land acquisition or exchange, Shaw Air Force Base, Sumter, South
Carolina.
Sec. 2823. Transfer of certain real property at Naval Weapons Industrial Re-
serve Plant, Calverton, New York, for use as national ceme-
tery.
Sec. 2824. Land conveyance, Fort Ord, California.
Sec. 2825. Land conveyance, Indiana Army Ammunition Plant, Charlestown,
Indiana.
Sec. 2826. Land conveyance, Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Sec. 2827. Land conveyance, Avon Park Air Force Range, Sebring, Florida.
Sec. 2828. Land conveyance, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin,
California.
Sec. 2829. Land conveyance, Holston Army Ammunition Plant, Mount Carmel,
Tennessee.
Sec. 2830. Land conveyance, Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant,
McGregor, Texas.
Sec. 2831. Transfer of jurisdiction and land conveyance, Fort Devens Military
Reservation, Massachusetts.
Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska.
Sec. 2833. Land conveyance alternative to existing lease authority, Naval Sup-
ply Center, Oakland, California.
Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Army Reserve Center, Youngstown, Ohio.
Sec. 2835. Modification of land conveyance, Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve
Plant, Calverton, New York.
Sec. 2836. Land exchange, Fort Lewis, Washington.
Sec. 2837. Modification of existing land conveyance, Hamilton Air Force Base.
Sec. 2838. Transfer of jurisdiction, Fort Bliss, Texas.
Subtitle D—Land Conveyances Involving Utilities
Sec. 2841. Conveyance of resource recovery facility, Fort Dix, New Jersey.
Sec. 2842. Conveyance of water and wastewater treatment plants, Fort Gordon,
Georgia.
Sec. 2843. Conveyance of electrical distribution system, Fort Irwin, California.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 2851. Expansion of authority to sell electricity.
Sec. 2852. Authority for Mississippi State Port Authority to use Navy property
at Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi.
Sec. 2853. Prohibition on joint civil aviation use of Naval Air Station Miramar,
California.
Sec. 2854. Report regarding Army water craft support facilities and activities.
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECU-
RITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL
SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3101. Weapons activities.
Sec. 3102. Environmental restoration and waste management.
Sec. 3103. Payment of penalties.
Sec. 3104. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3105. Defense nuclear waste disposal.
Subtitle B—Recurring General Provisions
Sec. 3121. Reprogramming.
Sec. 3122. Limits on general plant projects.
Sec. 3123. Limits on construction projects.
Sec. 3124. Fund transfer authority.
Sec. 3125. Authority for conceptual and construction design.
Sec. 3126. Authority for emergency planning, design, and construction activi-
ties.
Sec. 3127. Funds available for all national security programs of the Depart-
ment of Energy.
Sec. 3128. Availability of funds.
Subtitle C—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and
Limitations
Sec. 3131. Authority to conduct program relating to fissile materials.
Sec. 3132. National Ignition Facility.
Sec. 3133. Tritium production.
Subtitle D—Other Matters
Sec. 3141. Report on foreign tritium purchases.
Sec. 3142. Study on nuclear test readiness postures.
Sec. 3143. Master plan on warheads in the enduring stockpile.
Sec. 3144. Prohibition on international inspections of Department of Energy
facilities unless protection of restricted data is certified.
Sec. 3145. Accelerated schedule for environmental management activities.
TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY
BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
TITLE XXXIII—NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE
Sec. 3301. Fiscal year 1996 authorized uses of stockpile funds.
Sec. 3302. Preference for domestic upgraders in disposal of chromite and man-
ganese ores and chromium ferro and manganese metal electro-
lytic.
Sec. 3303. Restrictions on disposal of manganese ferro.
Sec. 3304. Titanium initiative to support battle tank upgrade program.
TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 3402. Price requirement on sale of certain petroleum during fiscal year
1996.
Sec. 3403. Sale of Naval Petroleum Reserve Numbered 1 (Elk Hills).
Sec. 3404. Study regarding future of naval petroleum reserves (other than
Naval Petroleum Reserve Numbered 1).
TITLE XXXV—PANAMA CANAL COMMISSION
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 3501. Short title.
Sec. 3502. Authorization of expenditures.
Sec. 3503. Expenditures in accordance with other laws.
Subtitle B—Reconstitution of Commission as Government
Corporation
Sec. 3521. Short title.
Sec. 3522. Reconstitution of commission as government corporation.
Sec. 3523. Supervisory board.
Sec. 3524. International advisors.
Sec. 3525. General and specific powers of commission.
Sec. 3526. Congressional review of budget.
Sec. 3527. Audits.
Sec. 3528. Prescription of measurement rules and rates of tolls.
Sec. 3529. Procedures for changes in rules of measurement and rates of tolls.
Sec. 3530. Miscellaneous technical amendments.
Sec. 3531. Conforming amendment to title 31, United States Code.
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DEFINED.
For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘congressional de-
fense committees’’ means—
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on National Security and the
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives.
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A—Authorization of
Appropriations
SEC. 101. ARMY.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for procurement for the Army as follows:
(1) For aircraft, $1,423,067,000.
(2) For missiles, $862,830,000.
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles,
$1,359,664,000.
(4) For ammunition, $1,062,715,000.
(5) For other procurement, $2,545,587,000.
SEC. 102. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.
(a) NAVY.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 1996 for procurement for the Navy
as follows:
(1) For aircraft, $4,106,488,000.
(2) For weapons, including missiles and tor-
pedoes, $1,626,411,000.
(3) 
For 
shipbuilding 
and 
conversion,
$6,227,958,000.
(4) For other procurement, $2,461,472,000.
(b) MARINE CORPS.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal year 1996 for procurement for
the Marine Corps in the amount of $399,247,000.
(c) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION.—Funds
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement
of ammunition for Navy and the Marine Corps in the
amount of $461,779,000.
SEC. 103. AIR FORCE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for procurement for the Air Force as fol-
lows:
(1) For aircraft, $7,031,952,000.
(2) For missiles, $3,430,083,000.
(3) For ammunition, $321,328,000.
(4) For other procurement, $6,784,801,000.
SEC. 104. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for Defense-wide procurement in the
amount of $2,205,917,000.
SEC. 105. RESERVE COMPONENTS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for procurement of aircraft, vehicles, com-
munications equipment, and other equipment for the re-
serve components of the Armed Forces as follows:
(1) 
For 
the 
Army 
National 
Guard,
$150,000,000.
(2) For the Air National Guard, $227,800,000.
(3) For the Army Reserve, $84,300,000.
(4) For the Naval Reserve, $86,000,000.
(5) For the Air Force Reserve, $171,200,000.
(6) 
For 
the 
Marine 
Corps 
Reserve,
$50,700,000.
SEC. 106. CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM.
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—There is hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal year 1996 the amount of
$746,698,000 for—
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents
and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of
the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986
(50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel
of the United States that is not covered by section
1412 of such Act.
(b) ALLOCATION.—Of the funds specified in sub-
section (a)—
(1) $393,850,000 is for operations and mainte-
nance;
(2) $299,448,000 is for procurement; and
SEC. 132. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST FOR
SSN–21 AND SSN–22 SEAWOLF SUBMARINES.
Section 122 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat.
2682) is repealed.
SEC. 133. COMPETITION REQUIRED FOR SELECTION OF
SHIPYARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSELS
FOR NEXT GENERATION ATTACK SUBMARINE
PROGRAM.
(a) COMPETITION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the
Navy shall select on a competitive basis the shipyard for
construction of each vessel for the next generation attack
submarine program.
(b) PROGRAM IDENTIFIED.—The next generation at-
tack submarine program shall begin with the first sub-
marine for which the Secretary of the Navy enters into
a contract for construction after the submarine that is
programmed to be constructed using funds appropriated
for fiscal year 1998.
SEC. 134. SONOBUOY PROGRAMS.
Of the amount provided in section 102(a)(4)—
(1) none of such amount shall be available for
the AN/SSQ–53 (DIFAR) program; and
(2) $8,902,000 shall be available for the AN/
SSQ–110 (EER) program.
Subtitle D—Air Force Programs
SEC. 141. REPEAL OF LIMITATIONS.
The following provisions of law are repealed:
(1) Section 112 of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991
(Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1373).
(2) Section 151(c) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law
102–484; 106 Stat. 2339).
(3) Sections 131(c) and 131(d) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
(Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1569).
(4) Section 133(e) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law
103–337; 108 Stat. 2688).
Subtitle E—Chemical
Demilitarization Program
SEC. 151. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO PROCEED EXPEDI-
TIOUSLY WITH DEVELOPMENT OF CHEMICAL
DEMILITARIZATION CRYOFRACTURE FACIL-
ITY AT TOOELE ARMY DEPOT, UTAH.
Subsection (a) of section 173 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public
Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1393) is repealed.
SEC. 152. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING COST GROWTH
IN PROGRAM FOR DESTRUCTION OF THE EX-
ISTING STOCKPILE OF LETHAL CHEMICAL
AGENTS AND MUNITIONS.
The Congress is concerned that growth in the esti-
mated cost of the program to demilitarize the United
States’ stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions
raises serious questions regarding that program. Accord-
ingly, it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of
Defense should consider measures to reduce the overall
cost of the chemical stockpile demilitarization program,
while minimizing total risk and ensuring the maximum
protection for the environment, the general public, and the
personnel involved in the destruction of lethal chemical
agents and munitions.
SEC. 153. ASSISTANCE FOR CHEMICAL WEAPONS STOCK-
PILE COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY BASE CLO-
SURE.
The Secretary of Defense shall review and evaluate
issues associated with closure and reutilization of Depart-
ment of Defense facilities co-located with continuing chem-
ical stockpile and chemical demilitarization operations.
The review shall include analysis of the economic impacts
on these communities and the unique reuse problems fac-
ing local communities associated with ongoing chemical
weapons programs. The review should also include rec-
ommendations from the Secretary on methods for expedi-
tious and cost-effective transfer of these facilities to local
communities for base reuse or privatization. The Secretary
shall submit to Congress a report on the review and eval-
uation not later than 90 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act.
TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOP-
MENT, TEST, AND EVALUA-
TION
Subtitle A—Authorization of
Appropriations
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for the use of the Department of Defense
for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows:
(1) For the Army, $4,774,947,000.
(2) For the Navy, $8,516,509,000.
(3) For the Air Force, $13,184,102,000.
(4) 
For 
Defense-wide 
activities,
$9,548,986,000, of which $239,341,000 is author-
ized for the activities of the Director, Test and Eval-
uation.
SEC. 202. AMOUNT FOR BASIC RESEARCH AND EXPLOR-
ATORY DEVELOPMENT.
(a) FISCAL YEAR 1996.—Of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated by section 201, $4,181,076,000 shall
be available for basic research and exploratory develop-
ment projects.
(b) BASIC RESEARCH AND EXPLORATORY DEVELOP-
MENT DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, the term
‘‘basic research and exploratory development’’ means work
funded in program elements for defense research and de-
velopment under Department of Defense category 6.1 or
6.2.
SEC. 203. MODIFICATIONS TO STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
(a) PURPOSES OF PROGRAM.—Section 2901(b) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) by striking out ‘‘and the Department
of Energy’’; and
(B) by striking out ‘‘their’’ and inserting
in lieu thereof ‘‘its’’;
(2) by striking out paragraph (3); and
(3) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para-
graph (3).
(b) COUNCIL.—Section 2902 of such title is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(A) by striking out ‘‘thirteen’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘12’’;
(B) by striking out paragraph (3);
(C) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5),
(6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) as paragraphs (3),
(4), (5), (6), (7), (8), and (9), respectively; and
(D) in paragraph (8), as redesignated, by
striking out ‘‘, who shall be nonvoting mem-
bers’’;
(2) in subsection (d)—
(A) by striking out paragraph (3);
(B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as
paragraph (3) and in that paragraph by strik-
ing out ‘‘Federal Coordinating Council on
Science, Engineering, and Technology’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘National Science and
Technology Council’’; and
(C) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and
(6) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively;
(3) in subsection (e)—
(A) by striking out paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3);
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5),
(6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) as paragraphs (1),
(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) respectively;
(C) in paragraph (2), as redesignated, by
striking out ‘‘such national and international
environmental problems as climate change and
ozone depletion’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘national and international environmental prob-
lems’’; and
(D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by
striking out ‘‘clauses (2) through (6)’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘paragraphs (1) through
(3)’’;
(4) by striking out subsections (f) and (h); and
(5) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub-
section (f).
(c) COMPETITIVE PROCEDURES.—Section 2903(c) of
such title is amended—
(1) by striking out ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘contracts’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘using competitive proce-
dures. The Executive Director may enter into’’; and
(2) by striking out ‘‘law, except that’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘law. In either case,’’.
(d) SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD.—Section 2904 of
such title is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking out ‘‘and the Secretary of
Energy’’; and
(B) by inserting after ‘‘in consultation
with’’ the following: ‘‘the Secretary of Energy
and’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) by striking out paragraph (3); and
(B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as
paragraph (3) and in that paragraph by strik-
ing out ‘‘three’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘not less than two years and not more than
six’’;
(3) by striking out subsections (g) and (h); and
(4) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection
(g).
Subtitle 
B—Program 
Require-
ments, Restrictions, and Limita-
tions
SEC. 211. SPACE LAUNCH MODERNIZATION.
(a) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Of the amount appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization in section 201(3)—
(1) $100,000,000 shall be available for a com-
petitive reusable rocket technology program (PE
63401F); and
(2) $7,500,000 shall be available for evaluation
of prototype hardware of low-cost expendable launch
vehicles (PE 63401F).
(b) LIMITATION.—Funds made available pursuant to
subsection (a)(1) may be obligated only to the extent that
the fiscal year 1996 current operating plan of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration allocates at least
an equal amount for its Reusable Space Launch program.
SEC. 212. MANEUVER VARIANT UNMANNED AERIAL VEHI-
CLE.
None of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made
available pursuant to the authorizations in section 201
may be obligated for the Maneuver Variant Unmanned
Aerial Vehicle.
SEC. 213. TACTICAL MANNED RECONNAISSANCE.
None of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made
available pursuant to an authorization in this Act may be
used by the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct re-
search, development, test, or evaluation for a replacement
aircraft, pod, or sensor payload for the tactical manned
reconnaissance mission.
SEC. 214. ADVANCED LITHOGRAPHY PROGRAM.
Section 216 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat.
2693) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking out ‘‘to help
achieve’’ and all that follows through the end of the
subsection and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘to ensure
that lithographic processes being developed by Amer-
ican-owned manufacturers operating in the United
States will lead to superior performance electronics
systems for the Department of Defense. For pur-
poses of the preceding sentence, the term ‘American-
owned manufacturers’ means a manufacturing com-
pany or other business entity the majority ownership
or control of which is by United States citizens.’’;
and
(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
‘‘(3) The Director of the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency may set priorities and funding levels for
various technologies being developed for the ALP and
shall consider funding recommendations by the SIA as ad-
visory.’’.
SEC. 215. ENHANCED FIBER OPTIC GUIDED MISSILE SYS-
TEM.
(a) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than December 1,
1995, the Secretary of the Army shall certify to the con-
gressional defense committees whether there is a require-
ment for the enhanced fiber optic guided missile (EFOG-
M) system and whether there is a cost and effectiveness
analysis supporting such requirement.
(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The Secretary of the Army
may not obligate more than $280,000,000 (based on fiscal
year 1995 constant dollars) to develop and deliver for test
and evaluation by the Army the following items:
(A) 44 EFOG-M test missiles.
(B) 256 fully operational EFOG-M missiles.
(C) 12 fully operational fire units.
(2) The Secretary of the Army may not spend funds
for the EFOG-M system after September 30, 1998, if the
items described in paragraph (1) have not been delivered
to the Army by that date at the cost estimated for such
system as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED
EQUIPMENT.—The
Secretary of the Army shall assure that all Government-
furnished equipment that the Army agrees to provide
under the contract for the EFOG-M system is provided
to the prime contractor in accordance with the terms of
the contract.
SEC. 216. JOINT ADVANCED STRIKE TECHNOLOGY (JAST)
PROGRAM.
(a) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Of the amount appro-
priated pursuant to the authorizations in section 201,
$280,156,000 shall be available for the Joint Advanced
Strike Technology (JAST) program. Of that amount—
(1) $123,795,000 shall be available for PE
63800N;
(2) $125,686,000 shall be available for PE
63800F; and
(3) $30,675,000 shall be available for PE
63800E.
(b) LIMITATION.—Not more than 75 percent of the
amount appropriated for such program pursuant to the
authorizations in section 201 may be obligated until a pe-
riod of 30 days has expired after the report specified in
subsection (c) is submitted to the congressional defense
committees.
(c) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report, in un-
classified and classified form, not later than March 1,
1996, that sets forth in detail the following information
for the period 1997 through 2005:
(1) What the total joint requirement, under two
major regional contingency (MRC) assumptions, is
for the following:
(A) Numbers of tactical combat aircraft
and the characteristics required of those air-
craft in terms of capabilities, range, and observ-
ability-stealthiness.
(B) Surface- and air-launched standoff
precision guided munitions.
(C) Cruise missiles.
(D) Ground-based systems, such as Ex-
tended Range-Multiple Launch Rocket System
and 
the 
Army 
Tactical 
Missile 
System
(ATACMS), for joint warfighting capability.
(2) What the major regional contingency warn-
ing time assumptions are, and what the effect on fu-
ture tactical fighter/attack aircraft requirements are
using other warning time assumptions.
(3) What requirements exist for the Joint Ad-
vanced Strike Technology program that cannot be
met by existing aircraft or by those in development.
SEC. 217. DEVELOPMENT OF LASER PROGRAM.
(a) LASER PROGRAM.—The amount authorized for
appropriation by section 201 is hereby increased by
$9,000,000, to be used for the development by the Naval
High Energy Laser Office of a continuous wave,
superconducting radio frequency free electron laser pro-
gram.
(b) OFFSET.—The amount authorized by section 201
is hereby reduced by $9,000,000, of which—
(1) $7,000,000 shall be derived from amounts
authorized for experimental evaluation of major in-
novative technologies (PE 63226E); and
(2) $2,000,000 shall be derived from amounts
authorized for the space test program (PE 63402F).
Subtitle C—Ballistic Missile
Defense Act of 1995
SEC. 231. SHORT TITLE.
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Ballistic Missile
Defense Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 232. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY OF THE
UNITED STATES.
It is the policy of the United States—
(1) to deploy at the earliest practical date high-
ly effective theater missile defenses (TMDs) to pro-
tect forward-deployed and expeditionary elements of
the Armed Forces of the United States and to com-
plement and support the missile defense capabilities
of friendly forces and of allies of the United States;
and
(2) to deploy at the earliest practical date a na-
tional missile defense (NMD) system that is capable
of providing a highly effective defense of the United
States against limited ballistic missile attacks.
SEC. 233. IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICY.
(a) TMD DEPLOYMENT.—To implement the policy
established in section 232(1), the Secretary of Defense
shall develop and deploy at the earliest practical date ad-
vanced theater missile defense (TMD) systems.
(b) NMD SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE.—To implement
the policy established in section 232(2), the Secretary of
Defense shall develop for deployment at the earliest prac-
tical date an affordable, operationally-effective National
Missile Defense (NMD) system designed to protect the
United States against limited ballistic missile attacks. The
system to be developed for deployment shall include the
following:
(1) Up to 100 ground-based interceptors at a
single site or a greater number of interceptors at a
number of sites, as determined necessary by the Sec-
retary.
(2) Fixed, ground-based radars.
(3) Space-based sensors, including, within the
type of space-based sensors known as ABM-adjunct
sensors (such sensors not being prohibited by the
ABM Treaty), those sensor systems (such as the
Space and Missile Tracking System) that are capa-
ble of cuing ground-based anti-ballistic missile inter-
ceptors and of providing initial targeting vectors.
(4) Battle management, command, control, and
communications.
(c) REPORT ON PLAN FOR DEPLOYMENT.—Not later
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report setting forth the Secretary’s
plan for—
(1) the deployment of advanced theater missile
defense (TMD) systems pursuant to subsection (a);
and
(2) the deployment of a national missile defense
system which meets the requirements specified in
subsection (b).
SEC. 234. FOLLOW-ON TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH AND DE-
VELOPMENT.
(a) FOLLOW-ON NATIONAL AND THEATER MISSILE
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY.—The Secretary shall pursue re-
search and development of technologies and systems relat-
ed to national missile defense and theater missile defense
in order to provide future options for—
(1) protecting the United States against limited
ballistic missile attacks; and
(2) defending forward-deployed and expedition-
ary elements of the Armed Forces of the United
States and complementing and supporting the mis-
sile defense capabilities of friendly forces and allies
of the United States.
(b) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN SYSTEMS FROM INITIAL
DEPLOYMENT.—The initial National Missile Defense sys-
tem architecture developed for deployment pursuant to
section 233(b) may not include—
(1) ground-based or space-based directed en-
ergy weapons; or
(2) space-based interceptors.
SEC. 235. POLICY ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABM TREATY.
(a) POLICY CONCERNING SYSTEMS SUBJECT
TO
ABM TREATY.—Congress finds that, unless and until a
missile defense system, system upgrade, or system compo-
nent is flight tested in an ABM-qualifying flight test (as
defined in subsection (c)), such system, system upgrade,
or system component—
(1) has not, for purposes of the ABM Treaty,
been tested in an ABM mode nor been given capa-
bilities to counter strategic ballistic missiles; and
(2) therefore is not subject to any application,
limitation, or obligation under the ABM Treaty.
(b) PROHIBITIONS.—(1) Funds appropriated to the
Department of Defense may not be obligated or expended
for the purpose of—
(A) prescribing, enforcing, or implementing any
Executive order, regulation, or policy that would
apply the ABM Treaty (or any limitation or obliga-
tion under such Treaty) to research, development,
testing, or deployment of a theater missile defense
system, a theater missile defense system upgrade, or
a theater missile defense system component; or
(B) taking any other action to provide for the
ABM Treaty (or any limitation or obligation under
such Treaty) to be applied to research, development,
testing, or deployment of a theater missile defense
system, a theater missile defense system upgrade, or
a theater missile defense system component.
(2) This subsection applies with respect to each mis-
sile defense system, missile defense system upgrade, or
missile defense system component that is capable of coun-
tering modern theater ballistic missiles.
(3) This subsection shall cease to apply with respect
to a missile defense system, missile defense system up-
grade, or missile defense system component when that sys-
tem, system upgrade, or system component has been flight
tested in an ABM-qualifying flight test.
(c) ABM-QUALIFYING FLIGHT TEST DEFINED.—
For purposes of this section, an ABM-qualifying flight test
is a flight test against a ballistic missile which, in that
flight test, exceeds (1) a range of 3,500 kilometers, or (2)
a velocity of 5 kilometers per second.
SEC. 236. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAM AC-
COUNTABILITY.
(a) ANNUAL BMD PROGRAMS REPORT.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees an annual report describing the technical mile-
stones, schedule, and cost of each ballistic missile defense
program specified in subsection (c).
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report under
subsection (a) shall list all technical milestones, program
schedule milestones, and costs of each phase of develop-
ment and acquisition, together with total estimated pro-
gram costs, covering the entire life of each program speci-
fied in subsection (c).
(c) COVERED PROGRAMS.—The reports under this
section shall cover the following programs:
(1) Theater High Altitude Area Defense
(THAAD).
(2) Patriot Advanced Capability-3.
(3) Navy Lower Tier.
(4) Navy Upper Tier.
(5) Corps Surface-to-Air Missile.
(6) Hawk.
(7) Boost Phase Intercept.
(8) National Missile Defense.
(9) Arrow.
(10) Medium Extended Air Defense.
(11) Any theater missile defense program or
national missile defense program which the Depart-
ment of Defense initiates after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act.
(d) VARIANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—(1) In
the annual report under this section, the Secretary shall
describe, with respect to each program covered in the re-
port, any difference in the technical milestones, program
schedule milestones, and costs for that program—
(A) compared with the information relating to
that program in the report submitted in the previous
year; and
(B) compared with the information relating to
that program in the first report submitted under
this section in which that program is covered.
(2) Paragraph (1)(A) shall not apply to the first re-
port submitted under this section.
(e) DATE OF SUBMISSION.—The report required by
this section for any year shall be submitted not later than
30 days after the date on which the President’s budget
for the next fiscal year is submitted, except that the first
report shall be submitted not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 237. ABM TREATY DEFINED.
For purposes of this subtitle and subtitle D, the term
‘‘ABM Treaty’’ means the Treaty Between the United
States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the
Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems, and signed
at Moscow on May 26, 1972, and includes Protocols to
that Treaty, signed at Moscow on July 3, 1974.
SEC. 238. REPEAL OF MISSILE DEFENSE ACT OF 1991.
The Missile Defense Act of 1991 is repealed.
Subtitle D—Other Ballistic Missile
Defense Provisions
SEC. 241. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE FUNDING FOR FIS-
CAL YEAR 1996.
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated pursu-
ant to section 201 for fiscal year 1996 or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year
1996, not more than $3,070,199,000 may be obligated for
Ballistic Missile Defense programs.
SEC. 
242. 
POLICY 
CONCERNING 
BALLISTIC 
MISSILE
DEFENSE.
(a) BALLISTIC
MISSILE
DEFENSE
AND
OTHER
COUNTERPROLIFERATION
EFFORTS.—The 
Congress
views the deployment of ballistic missile defenses as a nec-
essary, but not sufficient, element of a broader strategy
to discourage both the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction and the proliferation of means of their delivery
and to defend against the consequences of such prolifera-
tion. The Congress, therefore, endorses and supports
measures designed to slow or halt the proliferation of ad-
vanced technologies that pose a threat to the safety and
security of the United States and to international stability.
(b) BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE AND STRATEGIC
STABILITY.—(1) The Congress views the deployment of
ballistic missile defenses as a strategically stabilizing
measure.
(2) The deployment of Theater Missile Defense sys-
tems at the earliest practical date pursuant to section
232(a)(1) will deny potential adversaries the option of es-
calating a conflict by threatening or attacking United
States forces, coalition partners of the United States, or
allies of the United States with ballistic missiles armed
with weapons of mass destruction to offset the operational
and technical advantages of the United States and its coa-
lition partners and allies.
(3) The deployment of a National Missile Defense
system at the earliest practical date pursuant to section
232(a)(2) against the threat of limited ballistic missile
attacks—
(A) will strengthen deterrence at the levels of
forces agreed to by the United States and Russia
under the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks Treaties
(START–I and START–II); and
(B) would further strengthen deterrence if re-
ductions below the levels permitted under START–
II should be agreed to in the future.
(c) PRESIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS WITH OTHER NA-
TIONS.—(1) The Congress—
(A) notes that on the basis of section 235 it is
no longer necessary for the United States to con-
tinue discussions with Russia to clarify the distinc-
tion between ABM and TMD systems and, therefore,
urges the President to discontinue any such discus-
sions;
(B) notes that the ABM Treaty prohibits de-
ployment of ground-based interceptors in a number
that would be sufficient to assure that the entire
continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii are
defended against limited ballistic missile attacks;
and
(C) notes that past discussions with Russia,
based on Russian President Yeltsin’s proposal for a
Global Protection System, held promise of an agree-
ment to amend the ABM Treaty to allow defense
against a limited ballistic missile attack that would
have included (among other measures) permitted de-
ployment of as many as four ground-based intercep-
tor sites in addition to the one site currently per-
mitted under the ABM Treaty and unrestricted ex-
ploitation of ground-based and space-based sensors.
(2) In light of the findings in paragraph (1), Con-
gress urges the President to pursue high-level discussions
with Russia to amend the ABM Treaty to permit—
(A) deployment of the number of ground-based
ABM sites necessary to provide effective defense of
the entire territory of the United States against lim-
ited ballistic missile attack; and
(B) the unrestricted exploitation of sensors
based within the atmosphere and in space.
(3) It is in the interest of the United States to de-
velop its own missile defense capabilities in a manner that
will permit the United States to complement and support
the missile defense capabilities developed and deployed by
its allies and possible coalition partners. Therefore, the
Congress urges the President—
(A) to pursue high-level discussions with allies
and selected other states on the means and methods
by which the parties on a bilateral basis can cooper-
ate in the development, deployment, and operation of
ballistic missile defenses;
(B) to take the initiative within the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization to develop consensus in
the Alliance for a timely deployment of effective bal-
listic missile defenses by the Alliance; and
(C) in the interim, to seek agreement with allies
and selected other states on steps the parties should
take, consistent with their national interests, to re-
duce the risks posed by the threat of limited ballistic
missile attacks, such steps to include—
(i) the sharing of early warning informa-
tion derived from sensors deployed by the Unit-
ed States and other states;
(ii) the exchange on a reciprocal basis of
technical data and technology to support both
joint development programs and the sale and
purchase of missile defense systems and compo-
nents; and
(iii) operational level planning to exploit
current missile defense capabilities and to help
define future requirements.
SEC. 243. TESTING OF THEATER MISSILE DEFENSE INTER-
CEPTORS.
Subsection (a) of section 237 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–
160; 107 Stat. 1600) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(a) TESTING
OF
THEATER
MISSILE DEFENSE
INTERCEPTORS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may not
approve a theater missile defense interceptor program pro-
ceeding beyond the low-rate initial production acquisition
stage until the Secretary certifies to the congressional de-
fense committees that such program has successfully com-
pleted initial operational test and evaluation.
‘‘(2) In order to be certified under paragraph (1) as
having been successfully completed, the initial operational
test and evaluation conducted with respect to an intercep-
tors program must have included flight tests—
‘‘(A) that were conducted with multiple inter-
ceptors and multiple targets in the presence of real-
istic countermeasures; and
‘‘(B) the results of which demonstrate the
achievement by the interceptors of the baseline per-
formance thresholds.
‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the baseline
performance thresholds with respect to a program are the
weapons systems performance thresholds specified in the
baseline description for the system established (pursuant
to section 2435(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code) be-
fore the program entered the engineering and manufactur-
ing development stage.
‘‘(4) The number of flight tests described in para-
graph (2) that are required in order to make the certifi-
cation under paragraph (1) shall be a number determined
by the Secretary of Defense to be sufficient for the pur-
poses of this section.
‘‘(5) The Secretary may augment live-fire testing to
demonstrate weapons system performance goals for pur-
poses of the certification under paragraph (1) through the
use of modeling and simulation that is validated by ground
and flight testing.’’.
SEC. 244. REPEAL OF MISSILE DEFENSE PROVISIONS.
The following provisions of law are repealed:
(1) Section 222 of the Department of Defense
Authorization Act, 1986 (Public Law 99–145; 99
Stat. 613; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note).
(2) Section 225 of the Department of Defense
Authorization Act, 1986 (Public Law 99–145; 99
Stat. 614).
(3) Section 226 of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989
(Public Law 100–180; 101 Stat. 1057; 10 U.S.C.
2431 note).
(4) Section 8123 of the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1989 (Public Law 100–463;
102 Stat. 2270–40).
(5) Section 8133 of the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1992 (Public Law 102–172;
105 Stat. 1211).
(6) Section 234 of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law
103–160; 107 Stat. 1595; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note).
Subtitle E—Other Matters
SEC. 251. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR MEDICAL COUNTER-
MEASURES AGAINST BIOWARFARE THREATS.
Section 2370a of title 10, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking out ‘‘Depart-
ment of Defense—’’ and all that follows through
‘‘not more than 20 percent’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘Department of Defense, not more than 50
percent’’; and
(2) in subsection (b), by striking out paragraph
(2) and redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5)
as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively.
SEC. 252. ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATION OF BASIC RE-
SEARCH ACCOUNTS OF MILITARY DEPART-
MENTS.
(a) ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense
shall conduct an analysis of the cost and effectiveness of
consolidating the basic research accounts of the military
departments. The analysis shall determine potential infra-
structure savings and other benefits of co-locating and
consolidating the management of basic research.
(b) DEADLINE.—On or before March 1, 1996, the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate and the Committee on National Security
of the House of Representatives a report on the analysis
conducted under subsection (a).
SEC. 253. CHANGE IN REPORTING PERIOD FROM CAL-
ENDAR YEAR TO FISCAL YEAR FOR ANNUAL
REPORT ON CERTAIN CONTRACTS TO COL-
LEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.
Section 2361(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended—
(1) by striking out ‘‘calendar year’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘fiscal year’’; and
(2) by striking out ‘‘after the year’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘after the fiscal year’’.
SEC. 254. MODIFICATION TO UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INI-
TIATIVE SUPPORT PROGRAM.
Section 802 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat.
1701) is amended—
(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking out
‘‘shall’’ both places it appears and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘may’’; and
(2) in subsection (e), by striking out the sen-
tence beginning with ‘‘Such selection process’’.
SEC. 255. ADVANCED FIELD ARTILLERY SYSTEM (CRU-
SADER).
(a) AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR ALTERNATIVE
PROPELLANT TECHNOLOGIES.—During fiscal year 1996,
the Secretary of the Army may use funds appropriated
for the liquid propellant portion of the Advanced Field Ar-
tillery System (Crusader) program for fiscal year 1996 for
alternative propellant technologies and integration of
those technologies into the design of the Crusader system
if—
(1) the Secretary determines that the technical
risk associated with liquid propellant will increase
costs and delay the initial operational capability of
the Crusader system; and
(2) the Secretary notifies the congressional de-
fense committees of the proposed use of the funds
and the reasons for the proposed use of the funds.
(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Army may
not spend funds for the liquid propellant portion of the
Crusader system after August 1, 1996, unless significant
progress has been made toward meeting the objectives set
forth in subsection (c) and the statement described in sub-
section (d) has been submitted to the congressional de-
fense committees.
(c) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives referred to in sub-
section (b) are the following:
(1) Breech and ignition design criteria for rate
of fire for the cannon of the Crusader system have
been met.
(2) The final ignition concept has been designed
and successfully bench tested for the next prototype
of the cannon of the Crusader system.
(3) Designs to prevent chamber piston reversals
have been tested in a fixed weapons test stand.
(4) The chemistry and physics of propellant
burn resulting from the firing of liquid propellant
into any target zone are fully understood, and pre-
dictable firings have been demonstrated.
(5) An analysis of the management of heat dis-
sipation has been made for the full range of per-
formance requirements for the cannon, and concept
designs supported by that analysis are completed
and proposed for engineering.
(6) Engineering designs to control pressure os-
cillations in the chamber during firing are proven
and planned for integration into the next prototype
of the cannon.
(7) Fill designs for the cannon chamber that
focus on preventing future chamber explosions have
been electronically simulated and bench tested.
(8) An assessment of the sensitivity of liquid
propellant to contamination by various materials to
which it may be exposed throughout the handling
and operation of the cannon is completed.
(d) STATEMENT.—The statement referred to in sub-
section (b) is a statement submitted to the congressional
defense committees not later than March 30, 1996, that
contains the following:
(1) An assertion that all the hazards associated
with liquid propellent have been identified and are
controllable to acceptable levels.
(2) An assessment of the technology for each
component of the Crusader system (the cannon, ve-
hicle, and crew module). The technology assessment
shall include, for each performance goal of the Cru-
sader system (including total system weight), infor-
mation about the maturity of the technology to
achieve that goal, the maturity of the design of the
technology, and the manner in which the design has
been proven (for example, through simulation, bench
testing, or weapon firing).
(3) An assessment of the cost of continued de-
velopment of the Crusader system after August 1,
1996, the cost of each unit of the Crusader system
in the year the Crusader system will be completed,
and the cost of each unit of the Future Armored Re-
supply Vehicle (FARV) in the year that vehicle will
be completed.
SEC. 
256. 
REVIEW 
OF 
C4I 
BY 
NATIONAL 
RESEARCH
COUNCIL.
(a) REVIEW BY NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a
contract with the National Research Council of the Na-
tional Academy of Sciences to conduct a comprehensive
review of current and planned service and defense-wide
programs for command, control, communications, comput-
ers, and intelligence (C4I) with a special focus on cross-
service and inter-service issues.
(b) MATTERS TO BE ASSESSED IN REVIEW.—The
review shall address the following:
(1) The match between the capabilities provided
by current service and defense-wide C4I programs
and the actual needs of users of these programs.
(2) The interoperability of service and defense-
wide C4I systems that are planned to be operational
in the future.
(3) The need for an overall defense-wide archi-
tecture for C4I.
(4) Proposed strategies for ensuring that future
C4I acquisitions are compatible and interoperable
with an overall architecture.
(5) Technological and administrative aspects of
the C4I modernization effort to determine the sound-
ness of the underlying plan and the extent to which
it is consistent with concepts for joint military oper-
ations in the future.
(c) TWO-YEAR PERIOD FOR CONDUCTING REVIEW.—
The National Research Council shall conduct the review
over the two-year period beginning upon completion of the
performance of the contract described in subsection (a).
(d) REPORTS.—(1) The National Research Council
shall submit to the Department of Defense and Congress
interim reports and progress updates on a regular basis
as the review proceeds. A final report on the review shall
set forth the findings, conclusions, and recommendations
of the Council for defense-wide and service C4I programs
and shall be submitted to the Committee on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate, the Committee on National Security
of the House of Representatives, and the Secretary of De-
fense.
(2) To the maximum degree possible, the final report
shall be submitted in unclassified form with classified an-
nexes as necessary.
(e) INTERAGENCY COOPERATION WITH STUDY.—All
military departments, defense agencies, and other compo-
nents of the Department of Defense shall cooperate fully
with the National Research Council in its activities in car-
rying out the review under this section.
(f) EXPEDITED PROCESSING OF SECURITY CLEAR-
ANCES FOR STUDY.—For the purpose of facilitating the
commencement of the study under this section, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall expedite to the fullest degree pos-
sible the processing of security clearances that are nec-
essary for the National Research Council to conduct the
study.
(g) FUNDING.—Of the amount authorized to be ap-
propriated in section 201 for defense-wide activities,
$900,000 shall be available for the study under this sec-
tion.
SEC. 257. FIVE-YEAR PLAN FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED RE-
SEARCH 
AND 
DEVELOPMENT 
CENTERS
(FFRDCS).
(a) FIVE-YEAR PLAN.—The Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretaries of the military depart-
ments, shall develop a five-year plan to reduce and consoli-
date the activities performed by federally funded research
and development centers (FFRDCs) and establish a
framework for the future workload of such centers.
(b) OBJECTIVES.—The plan shall set forth the man-
ner in which the Secretary of Defense could achieve by
October 1, 2000, the following:
(1) Implementation by federally funded re-
search and development centers of only those core
activities, as defined by the Secretary, that require
the unique capabilities and arrangements afforded
by such centers.
(2) Consolidation of such core level activities
into as few federally funded research and develop-
ment centers as is practical and possible.
(3) Acquisition of systems engineering and sys-
tems integration activities currently performed by
federally funded research and development centers
through the use of competitive procedures.
(4) Transfer of the management of the Soft-
ware Engineering Institute activities to the Defense
Information Systems Agency for purposes of sup-
porting command, control, communications, comput-
ing, and intelligence (C4I) programs.
(5) Transfer of the management of the core ac-
tivities of Lincoln Laboratory to the Office of the
Secretary of Defense.
(6) Acquisition of services provided to the De-
partment of Defense by university-affiliated research
centers (that operate like federally funded research
and development centers) through the use of com-
petitive procedures.
(c) OTHER MATTERS.—The plan also shall include
the following:
(1) An assessment of the number of staff need-
ed in each federally funded research and develop-
ment center during each year over the five years cov-
ered by the plan.
(2) A specific timetable for phasing in the ob-
jectives set forth in subsection (b).
(d) REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 1996, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report on the plan.
(e) UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION.—The total amount
authorized to be appropriated for research, development,
test, and evaluation in section 201 for federally funded
research and development centers and university-affiliated
research centers is hereby reduced by $90,097,000.
SEC. 258. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2525 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) The heading is amended by striking out the
second and third words.
(2) Subsection (a) is amended by striking out
‘‘Science and’’.
(3) Subsection (d) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by striking out ‘‘or’’ at the end of
subparagraph (A);
(ii) by striking out the period at the
end of subparagraph (B) and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘; or’’; and
(iii) by adding at the end the follow-
ing new subparagraph:
‘‘(C) will be carried out by an institution of
higher education.’’; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
‘‘(3) At least 25 percent of the funds available for
the program each fiscal year shall be used for awarding
grants and entering into contracts, cooperative agree-
ments, and other transactions on a cost-share basis under
which the ratio of recipient costs to Government costs is
two to one.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to
section 2525 in the table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘2525. Manufacturing technology program.’’.
SEC. 259. FIVE-YEAR PLAN FOR CONSOLIDATION OF DE-
FENSE LABORATORIES AND TEST AND EVAL-
UATION CENTERS.
(a) FIVE-YEAR PLAN.—The Secretary of Defense
shall develop a five-year plan to consolidate and restruc-
ture the laboratories and test and evaluation centers of
the Department of Defense.
(b) OBJECTIVE.—The plan shall set forth the specific
actions needed to consolidate the laboratories and test and
evaluation centers into as few laboratories and centers as
is practical and possible, in the judgment of the Secretary,
by October 1, 2005.
(c) MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.—In developing
the plan, the Secretary shall consider the following:
(1) Consolidation of common support functions,
including the following:
(A) Aircraft (fixed wing and rotary).
(B) Weapons.
(C) Space systems.
(D) Command, control, communications,
computers, and intelligence.
(2) The extent to which any military construc-
tion is planned at the laboratories and centers.
(3) The encroachment on the laboratories and
centers by residential and industrial expansion.
(4) The cost of operations and maintenance at
the laboratories and centers.
(5) The cost of environmental remediation at
the laboratories and centers.
(d) REPORT.—Not later than May 1, 1996, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the plan.
(e) LIMITATION.—Of the amounts appropriated or
otherwise made available pursuant to an authorization in
section 201 for the central test and evaluation investment
development program, not more than 40 percent may be
obligated before the report required by subsection (d) is
submitted to Congress.
SEC. 260. AERONAUTICAL RESEARCH AND TEST CAPABILI-
TIES ASSESSMENT.
(a) POLICY.—(1) It is in the Nation’s long-term na-
tional security interests to maintain preeminence in the
area of aeronautical research and test capabilities.
(2) Continued advances in aeronautical science and
engineering are critical to sustaining the strategic and tac-
tical air superiority of the United States and coalition
forces, as well as United States economic security and
international aerospace leadership.
(3) Encouragement of active Department of Defense
partnership with other Government agencies, academic in-
stitutions, and private industry to develop, maintain, and
enhance aeronautical research and test capabilities is in
the national security and economic interest of the Depart-
ment and the United States.
(b) REVIEW.—(1) In pursuit of the aeronautical re-
search and test capabilities policy set forth in subsection
(a), the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehen-
sive review of the aeronautical research and test facilities
and capabilities of the United States in order to assess
the current condition of such facilities and capabilities.
(2) The review shall identify options for providing af-
fordable, operable, reliable, and responsive long-term aero-
nautical research and test capabilities for military and ci-
vilian purposes and for the organization and conduct of
such capabilities within the Department or through shared
operations with other Government agencies, academic in-
stitutions, and private industry. The review also shall set
forth in detail the projected costs of such options, includ-
ing costs of acquisition and technical and financial ar-
rangements (including the use of Government facilities for
reimbursable private use).
(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 1996, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report setting forth in detail the find-
ings of the review required by subsection (b). The report
shall include recommendations on the most efficient and
economic means of developing, maintaining, and contin-
ually modernizing aeronautical research and test capabili-
ties to meet current, planned, and prospective military and
civilian needs.
SEC. 261. LIMITATION ON T–38 AVIONICS UPGRADE PRO-
GRAM.
(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall
ensure that, in evaluating proposals submitted in response
to a solicitation issued for a contract for the T–38 Avi-
onics Upgrade Program, the proposal of an entity may not
be considered unless—
(1) in the case of an entity that conducts sub-
stantially all of its business in a foreign country, the
foreign country provides equal access to similar con-
tract solicitations in that country to United States
entities; and
(2) in the case of an entity that conducts busi-
ness in the United States but that is owned or con-
trolled by a foreign government or by an entity in-
corporated in a foreign country, the foreign govern-
ment or foreign country of incorporation provides
equal access to similar contract solicitations in that
country to United States entities.
(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘United
States entity’’ means an entity that is owned or controlled
by persons a majority of whom are United States citizens.
SEC. 262. CROSS REFERENCE TO CONGRESSIONAL DE-
FENSE 
POLICY 
CONCERNING 
NATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL BASE, REIN-
VESTMENT, AND CONVERSION IN OPERATION
OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMS.
(a) 
SECTION
2358 
PROJECTS.—Section
2358(a)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
656
not more than 15 years. Under the agreement, the Sec-
retary shall provide the Port Authority with an option to
extend the agreement for at least three additional periods
of five years each.
(c) CONDITIONS ON USE.—The agreement author-
ized under subsection (a) shall require the Port Author-
ity—
(1) to suspend operations under the agreement
in the event Navy contingency operations are con-
ducted at the Center; and
(2) to use the property covered by the agree-
ment in a manner consistent with Navy operations
conducted at the Center.
(d) CONSIDERATION.—(1) As consideration for the
use of the property covered by the agreement under sub-
section (a), the Port Authority shall pay to the Navy an
amount equal to the fair market rental value of the prop-
erty, as determined by the Secretary taking into consider-
ation the Port Authority’s use of the property.
(2) The Secretary may include a provision in the
agreement requiring the Port Authority—
(A) to pay the Navy an amount (as determined
by the Secretary) to cover the costs of replacing at
the Center any facilities vacated by the Navy on ac-