1128 
HR 6395 PCS
(ii) if national technical means are 
used as a replacement to obtain such im-
agery— 
(I) how the requirements satis-
fied by collection under the Treaty 
will be prioritized within the National 
Intelligence Priorities Framework; 
(II) a plan to mitigate any gaps 
in collection; and 
(III) requirements and timelines 
for declassification of data for public 
release; and 
(iii) if commercial imagery is used as 
a replacement to obtain such imagery— 
(I) contractual actions and asso-
ciated timelines needed to purchase 
such imagery; 
(II) costs to purchase commercial 
imagery equivalent to that which is 
obtained under the Treaty; and 
(III) estimates of costs to share 
that data with other state parties to 
the Treaty that are United States 
partners. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01128
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1129 
HR 6395 PCS
(C) A description of how the United States 
will replace intelligence information, other than 
imagery, obtained under the Treaty. 
(D) A description of how the United States 
will ensure continued dialogue with Russia in a 
manner similar to formal communications as 
confidence-building measures to reinforce stra-
tegic stability required under the Treaty. 
(E) All unedited responses to the question-
naire provided to United States allies by the 
United States in 2019 and all official state-
ments provided to the United States by United 
States allies in 2019 or 2020 relating to United 
States withdrawal from the Treaty. 
(F) An assessment of the impact of such 
withdrawal on— 
(i) United States leadership in the 
North 
Atlantic 
Treaty 
Organization 
(NATO); and 
(ii) cohesion and cooperation among 
NATO member states. 
(G) A description of options to continue 
confidence-building measures under the Treaty 
with other state parties to the Treaty that are 
United States allies. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01129
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1130 
HR 6395 PCS
(H) An assessment of the Defense Intel-
ligence Agency of the impact on national secu-
rity of such withdrawal. 
(I) An assessment of how the United 
States will influence decisions regarding certifi-
cations of new sensors, primarily synthetic ap-
erture radar sensors, under the Treaty that 
could pose additional risk to deployed United 
States military forces and assets. 
(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph 
(1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may 
contain a classified annex. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMIT-
TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com-
mittees’’ means— 
(A) the congressional defense committees; 
(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the House of Representatives; and 
(C) the Committee on Foreign Relations 
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
Senate. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01130
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1131 
HR 6395 PCS
(2) OBSERVATION FLIGHT.—The term ‘‘obser-
vation flight’’ has the meaning given such term in 
Article II of the Open Skies Treaty. 
(3) OPEN SKIES TREATY; TREATY.—The term 
‘‘Open Skies Treaty’’ or ‘‘Treaty’’ means the Treaty 
on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 1992, 
and entered into force January 1, 2002. 
SEC. 
1235. 
SENSE 
OF 
CONGRESS 
ON 
SUPPORT 
FOR 
UKRAINE. 
It is the sense of Congress that the United States 
should— 
(1) reaffirm support for an enduring strategic 
partnership between the United States and Ukraine; 
(2) support Ukraine’s sovereignty and terri-
torial integrity within its internationally-recognized 
borders and make clear it does not recognize the 
independence of Crimea or Eastern Ukraine cur-
rently occupied by Russia; 
(3) continue support for multi-domain security 
assistance for Ukraine in the form of lethal and non- 
lethal measures to build resiliency, bolster deterrence 
against Russia, and promote stability in the region 
by— 
(A) strengthening defensive capabilities 
and promoting readiness; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01131
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1132 
HR 6395 PCS
(B) improving interoperability with NATO 
forces; and 
(4) further enhance security cooperation and 
engagement with Ukraine and other Black Sea re-
gional partners. 
SEC. 1236. REPORT ON PRESENCE OF RUSSIAN MILITARY 
FORCES IN OTHER FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of De-
fense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a re-
port that contains the following: 
(1) A list of foreign countries that have con-
sented to host military forces of Russia, including a 
description of— 
(A) any agreement between each country 
and Russia to host such forces; 
(B) the number of Russian military forces 
that are present in each country; 
(C) the location of Russian military forces 
that are present in each country; 
(D) the types of Russian military force 
structures that are present in each country; 
(E) the level and type of United States se-
curity assistance provided to each country; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01132
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1133 
HR 6395 PCS
(F) any military exercises that Russian 
forces have undertaken with each country. 
(2) A list of foreign countries with respect to 
which Russia has deployed military forces in viola-
tion of the territorial sovereignty of such countries, 
including a description of— 
(A) the number of Russian military forces 
that are present in each country; 
(B) the location of Russian military forces 
that are present in each country; and 
(C) the types of Russian military force 
structures that are present in each country. 
(b) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 
a classified annex. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives; and 
(3) the Committee on Foreign Relations and 
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01133
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1134 
HR 6395 PCS
SEC. 1237. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE OPEN SKIES TREA-
TY. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the decision to withdraw from the Treaty on 
Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 1992, and 
entered into force January 1, 2002— 
(A) did not comply with the requirement in 
section 1234(a) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (133 Stat. 
1648; 22 U.S.C. 2593a note) to notify Congress 
not fewer than 120 days prior to any such an-
nouncement; 
(B) was made without asserting material 
breach of the Treaty by any other Treaty signa-
tory; and 
(C) was made over the objections of NATO 
allies and regional partners; 
(2) confidence and security building measures 
that are designed to reduce the risk of conflict, in-
crease trust among participating countries, and con-
tribute to military transparency remain vital to the 
strategic interests of our NATO allies and partners 
and should continue to play a central role as the 
United States engages in the region to promote 
transatlantic security; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01134
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1135 
HR 6395 PCS
(3) while the United States must always con-
sider the national security benefits of remaining in 
any treaty, responding to Russian violations of trea-
ty protocols should be prioritized through inter-
national engagement and robust diplomatic action. 
SEC. 1238. COUNTERING RUSSIAN AND OTHER OVERSEAS 
KLEPTOCRACY. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section 
(1) RULE OF LAW.—The term ‘‘rule of law’’ 
means the principle of governance in which all per-
sons, institutions, and entities, whether public or 
private, including the state itself, are accountable to 
laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced, 
and independently adjudicated, and which are con-
sistent with international human rights norms and 
standards. 
(2) FOREIGN STATE.—The term ‘‘foreign state’’ 
has the meaning given such term in section 1603 of 
title 28, United States Code. 
(3) INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY.—The term 
‘‘intelligence community’’ has the meaning given 
such term in section 3(4) of the National Security 
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 
(4) PUBLIC
CORRUPTION.—The term ‘‘public 
corruption’’ means the unlawful exercise of entrusted 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01135
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1136 
HR 6395 PCS
public power for private gain, including by bribery, 
nepotism, fraud, or embezzlement. 
(5) FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.—The term ‘‘foreign 
assistance’’ means foreign assistance authorized 
under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. 
(6) APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMIT-
TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com-
mittees’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations, 
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Finance 
of the Senate; and 
(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the 
Committee on Financial Services, and the Com-
mittee on Ways and Means of the House of 
Representatives. 
(b) INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS.—It is the sense of 
Congress that the following international standards should 
be the foundation for foreign states to combat corruption, 
kleptocracy, and illicit finance: 
(1) The United Nations Convention against 
Corruption. 
(2) Recommendations of the Financial Action 
Task Force (FATF) comprising the International 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01136
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1137 
HR 6395 PCS
Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the 
Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation. 
(3) The Organisation for Economic Co-oper-
ation and Development Convention on Combating 
Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International 
Business Transactions (OECD Anti-Bribery Conven-
tion), the 2009 Recommendation of the Council for 
Further Combating Bribery, the 2009 Recommenda-
tion on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes to Foreign 
Public Officials; and other related instruments. 
(4) Legal instruments adopted by the Council 
of Europe and monitored by the Group of States 
against Corruption (GRECO), including the Crimi-
nal Law Convention on Corruption, the Civil Law 
Convention on Corruption, the Additional Protocol 
to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption, the 
Twenty Guiding Principles against Corruption, the 
Recommendation on Codes of Conduct for Public 
Officials, and the Recommendation on Common 
Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political 
Parties and Electoral Campaigns. 
(5) Organization for Security and Cooperation 
in Europe (OSCE) ‘‘Second Dimension’’ commit-
ments on good governance, anti-corruption, anti- 
money laundering, and related issues. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01137
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1138 
HR 6395 PCS
(6) The Inter-American Convention Against 
Corruption under the Organization of American 
States. 
(c) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 
United States to— 
(1) leverage United States diplomatic engage-
ment and foreign assistance to promote the rule of 
law; 
(2) promote the international standards identi-
fied in section 4, as well as other relevant inter-
national standards and best practices as such stand-
ards and practices develop, and to seek the universal 
adoption and implementation of such standards and 
practices by foreign states; 
(3) support foreign states in promoting good 
governance and combating public corruption; 
(4) encourage and assist foreign partner coun-
tries to identify and close loopholes in their legal and 
financial architecture, including the misuse of anon-
ymous shell companies, free trade zones, and other 
legal structures, that are enabling illicit finance and 
authoritarian capital to penetrate their financial sys-
tems; 
(5) help foreign partner countries to investigate 
and combat the use of corruption by authoritarian 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01138
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1139 
HR 6395 PCS
governments, particularly that of Vladimir Putin in 
Russia, as a tool of malign influence worldwide; 
(6) make use of sanctions authorities, such as 
the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability 
Act (enacted as subtitle F of title XII of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2017 (Public Law 114–328; 22 U.S.C. 2656 note)), 
to identify and take action against corrupt foreign 
actors; and 
(7) ensure coordination between the depart-
ments and agencies of the United States Govern-
ment with jurisdiction over the advancement of good 
governance in foreign states. 
(d) ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION FUND.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall 
establish in the Department of State a fund to be 
known as the ‘‘Anti-Corruption Action Fund’’ to aid 
foreign states to prevent and fight public corruption 
and develop rule of law-based governance structures, 
including accountable investigative, prosecutorial, 
and judicial bodies, and supplement existing foreign 
assistance and diplomacy with respect to such ef-
forts. 
(2) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated to the Fund an amount equal to five per-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01139
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1140 
HR 6395 PCS
cent of each civil and criminal fine and penalty im-
posed pursuant to actions brought under the For-
eign Corrupt Practices Act on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act for each fiscal year. 
Amounts appropriated pursuant to this authoriza-
tion shall be authorized to remain available until ex-
pended. 
(3) SUPPORT.—The Anti-Corruption Action 
Fund may support governmental and nongovern-
mental parties in advancing the goals specified in 
paragraph (1) and shall be allocated in a manner 
complementary to existing United States foreign as-
sistance, diplomacy, and the anti-corruption activi-
ties of other international donors. 
(4) PREFERENCE.—In programing foreign as-
sistance using the Anti-Corruption Action Fund, the 
Secretary of State shall give preference to projects 
that— 
(A) assist countries that are undergoing 
historic opportunities for democratic transition, 
combating corruption, and the establishment of 
the rule of law; 
(B) are important to United States na-
tional interests; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01140
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1141 
HR 6395 PCS
(C) where United States foreign assistance 
could significantly increase the chance of a suc-
cessful transition described in subparagraph 
(A). 
(5) PUBLIC
DIPLOMACY.—The Secretary of 
State shall publicize that funds provided to the Anti- 
Corruption Action Fund originate from actions 
brought under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act so 
as to demonstrate that monies obtained under such 
Act are contributing to international anti-corruption 
work under this section, including by reducing the 
pressure that United States businesses face to pay 
bribes overseas, thereby contributing to greater 
United States competitiveness. 
(e) INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall 
have primary responsibility for managing a whole-of- 
government effort to improve coordination among 
United States Government departments and agen-
cies, as well as with other donor organizations, that 
have a role in promoting good governance in foreign 
states and enhancing the ability of foreign states to 
combat public corruption. 
(2) INTERAGENCY
TASK
FORCE.—Not later 
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01141
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1142 
HR 6395 PCS
this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish and 
convene an Interagency Task Force composed of— 
(A) representatives appointed by the Presi-
dent from appropriate departments and agen-
cies, including the Department of State, the 
United States Agency for International Devel-
opment (USAID), the Department of Justice, 
the Department of the Treasury, the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security, the Department of 
Defense, the Department of Commerce, the Mil-
lennium Challenge Corporation, and the intel-
ligence community; and 
(B) representatives from any other United 
States Government departments or agencies, as 
determined by the Secretary. 
(3) ADDITIONAL MEETINGS.—The Interagency 
Task Force established in paragraph (2) shall meet 
not less than twice per year. 
(4) DUTIES.—The Interagency Task Force es-
tablished in paragraph (2) shall— 
(A) evaluate, on a general basis, the effec-
tiveness of existing foreign assistance programs, 
including programs funded by the Anti-Corrup-
tion Action Fund under section 6, that have an 
impact on promoting good governance in for-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01142
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1143 
HR 6395 PCS
eign states and enhancing the ability of foreign 
states to combat public corruption; 
(B) assist the Secretary of State in man-
aging the whole-of-government effort described 
in subsection (a); 
(C) identify general areas in which such 
whole-of-government effort could be enhanced; 
and 
(D) recommend specific programs for for-
eign states that may be used to enhance such 
whole-of-government effort. 
(f) DESIGNATION OF EMBASSY ANTI-CORRUPTION 
POINTS OF CONTACT.— 
(1) EMBASSY ANTI-CORRUPTION POINT OF CON-
TACT.—The chief of mission of each United States 
embassy shall designate an anti-corruption point of 
contact for each such embassy. 
(2) DUTIES.—The designated anti-corruption 
points of contact under paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) with guidance from the Interagency 
Task Force established under subsection (e), 
coordinate an interagency approach within 
United States embassies to combat public cor-
ruption in the foreign states in which such em-
bassies are located that is tailored to the needs 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01143
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1144 
HR 6395 PCS
of such foreign states, including all relevant 
United States Government departments and 
agencies with a presence in such foreign states, 
such as the Department of State, USAID, the 
Department of Justice, the Department of the 
Treasury, the Department of Homeland Secu-
rity, the Department of Defense, the Millen-
nium Challenge Corporation, and the intel-
ligence community; 
(B) make recommendations regarding the 
use of the Anti-Corruption Action Fund under 
section 6 and other foreign assistance related to 
anti-corruption efforts in their respective for-
eign states, aligning such assistance with 
United States diplomatic engagement; and 
(C) ensure that anti-corruption activities 
carried out within their respective foreign states 
are included in regular reporting to the Sec-
retary of State and the Interagency Task Force 
under subsection (e), including United States 
embassy strategic planning documents and for-
eign assistance-related reporting, as appro-
priate. 
(3) TRAINING.—The Secretary of State shall 
develop and implement appropriate training for des-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01144
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1145 
HR 6395 PCS
ignated anti-corruption points of contact under this 
subsection. 
(g) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— 
(1) REPORT
ON
PROMOTING
INTERNATIONAL 
STANDARDS
IN
COMBATING
CORRUPTION, 
KLEPTOCRACY, AND
ILLICIT
FINANCE.—Not later 
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with 
the Administrator of the USAID and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, shall submit to the appropriate con-
gressional committees a report that— 
(A) summarizes any progress made by for-
eign states to adopt and implement each of the 
international standards in combating corrup-
tion, kleptocracy, and illicit finance listed in 
subsection (b); 
(B) details the efforts of the United States 
Government to promote such international 
standards; 
(C) identifies priority countries for out-
reach regarding such international standards; 
and 
(D) outlines a plan to encourage the adop-
tion and implementation of such international 
standards, including specific steps to take with 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01145
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1146 
HR 6395 PCS
the priority countries identified in accordance 
with subparagraph (C). 
(2) REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD IMPLEMEN-
TATION.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and annually thereafter for 3 
years, the Secretary of State, in consultation with 
the Administrator of the USAID, shall submit to the 
appropriate congressional committees a report sum-
marizing progress in implementing this Act, includ-
ing— 
(A) a description of the bureaucratic struc-
ture of the offices within the Department and 
USAID that are engaged in activities to combat 
corruption, kleptocracy, and illicit finance, and 
how such offices coordinate with one another; 
(B) information relating to the amount of 
funds deposited in the Anti-Corruption Action 
Fund established under section 6 and the obli-
gation, expenditure, and impact of such funds; 
(C) the activities of the Interagency Task 
Force established pursuant to subsection (e)(2); 
(D) the designation of anti-corruption 
points of contact for foreign states pursuant to 
subsection (f)(1) and any training provided to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01146
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1147 
HR 6395 PCS
such points of contact pursuant to subsection 
(f)(3); and 
(E) additional resources or personnel needs 
to better achieve the goals of this Act to combat 
corruption, kleptocracy, and illicit finance over-
seas. 
(3) ONLINE
PLATFORM.—The Secretary of 
State, in conjunction with the Administrator of the 
USAID, shall consolidate existing reports and brief-
ings with anti-corruption components into one on-
line, public platform, that includes the following: 
(A) The Annual Country Reports on 
Human Rights Practices. 
(B) The Fiscal Transparency Report. 
(C) The Investment Climate Statement re-
ports. 
(D) The International Narcotics Control 
Strategy Report. 
(E) Any other relevant public reports. 
(F) Links to third-party indicators and 
compliance mechanisms used by the United 
States Government to inform policy and pro-
gramming, such as the following: 
(i) The International Finance Cor-
poration’s Doing Business surveys. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01147
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1148 
HR 6395 PCS
(ii) The International Budget Part-
nership’s Open Budget Index. 
(iii) Multilateral peer review anti-cor-
ruption compliance mechanisms, such as 
the Organisation for Economic Co-oper-
ation and Development’s Working Group 
on Bribery in International Business 
Transactions, the Follow-Up Mechanism 
for the Inter-American Convention against 
Corruption (MESICIC), and the United 
Nations Convention against Corruption, 
done at New York October 31, 2003, to 
further highlight expert international views 
on foreign state challenges and efforts. 
SEC. 1239. REPORT ON THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES 
ARMED FORCES FROM THE RUSSIAN FED-
ERATION. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence 
and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a report on all threats to the 
United States Armed Forces and personnel of the United 
States from the Russian Federation and associated 
agents, entities, and proxies. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01148
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1149 
HR 6395 PCS
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) An assessment of all threats to the United 
States Armed Forces and personnel of the United 
States from Russia and associated agents, entities, 
and proxies in all theaters where United States 
Armed Forces are engaged. 
(2) A description of all actions taken to ensure 
force protection of both the United States Armed 
Forces and diplomats of the United States. 
(3) A description of non-military actions taken 
to emphasize to Russia that the United States will 
not tolerate threats to the armed forces of the 
United States, the allies of the United States, and 
the diplomats and operations of the United States. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (b) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 
a classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMITTEES 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate con-
gressional committees’’ means the following: 
(1) The Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
Representatives. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01149
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1150 
HR 6395 PCS
(2) The Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select 
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 
Subtitle E—Matters Relating to 
Europe and NATO 
SEC. 1241. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF FUNDS TO REDUCE 
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE 
ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY 
WHO ARE STATIONED IN GERMANY, TO RE-
DUCE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF 
THE ARMED FORCES STATIONED IN EUROPE, 
AND TO DIVEST MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE 
IN EUROPE. 
(a) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO REDUCE THE 
TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY WHO ARE STATIONED IN 
GERMANY.—None of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated or otherwise made available to the Department of 
Defense may be used during the period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 
31, 2021, to take any action to reduce the total number 
of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty 
who are stationed in Germany below the levels present on 
June 10, 2020, until 180 days after the date on which 
the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01150
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1151 
HR 6395 PCS
Chiefs of Staff have separately submitted to the congres-
sional defense committees the following: 
(1) A certification that— 
(A) such a reduction is in the national se-
curity interest of the United States and will not 
significantly undermine the security of the 
United States or its allies in the region, includ-
ing a justification explaining the analysis be-
hind the certification; and 
(B) the Secretary has appropriately con-
sulted with United States allies and partners in 
Europe, including all members of the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization (NATO), regarding 
such a reduction. 
(2) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on the security of United States 
allies and partners in Europe and on interoperability 
and joint activities with such allies and partners, in-
cluding major military exercises. 
(3) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on the ability to deter Russian 
aggression and ensure the territorial integrity of 
United States allies and partners in Europe. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01151
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1152 
HR 6395 PCS
(4) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on the ability to counter Russian 
malign activity. 
(5) A detailed analysis of where the members of 
the Armed Forces will be moved and stationed as a 
consequence of such a reduction. 
(6) A detailed plan for how such a reduction 
would be implemented. 
(7) A detailed analysis of the cost implications 
of such a reduction, to include the cost associated 
with new facilities to be constructed at the location 
to which the members of the Armed Forces are to 
be moved and stationed. 
(8) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on United States service mem-
bers and their families stationed in Europe. 
(9) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on Joint Force Planning. 
(10) A detailed explanation of the impact such 
a reduction would have on implementation of the 
National Defense Strategy and a certification that 
the reduction would not negatively affect implemen-
tation of the National Defense Strategy. 
(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO REDUCE THE 
TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01152
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1153 
HR 6395 PCS
STATIONED IN EUROPE.—None of the funds authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the De-
partment of Defense may be used during the period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
on December 31, 2021, to reduce the total number of 
members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who 
are stationed in Europe below the levels present on June 
10, 2020, until 180 days after the date on which the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
of Staff have separately submitted to the congressional de-
fense committees the following: 
(1) A certification that— 
(A) such a reduction is in the national se-
curity interest of the United States and will not 
significantly undermine the security of the 
United States or its allies in the region, includ-
ing a justification explaining the analysis be-
hind the certification. 
(B) the Secretary has appropriately con-
sulted with United States allies and partners in 
Europe, including all members of NATO, re-
garding such a reduction. 
(2) A detailed analysis of the impact such a re-
duction would have on the security of United States 
allies and partners in Europe and on interoperability 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01153
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1155 
HR 6395 PCS
(10) A detailed explanation of the impact such 
a reduction would have on implementation of the 
National Defense Strategy and a certification that 
the reduction would not negatively affect implemen-
tation of the National Defense Strategy. 
(c) LIMITATION TO DIVEST MILITARY INFRASTRUC-
TURE IN EUROPE.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 
may not take any action to divest any infrastructure 
or real property in Europe under the operational 
control of the Department of Defense unless, prior 
to taking such action, the Secretary certifies to the 
congressional defense committees that no military 
requirement for future use of the infrastructure or 
real property is foreseeable. 
(2) SUNSET.—This subsection shall terminate 
on the date that is 5 years after the date of the en-
actment of this Act. 
SEC. 1242. SENSE OF CONGRESS REAFFIRMING THE COM-
MITMENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO NATO. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) On April 4, 1949, the North Atlantic Trea-
ty Organization (NATO) was founded on the prin-
ciples of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01155
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1156 
HR 6395 PCS
of law with the aim of promoting collective security 
through collective defense. 
(2) NATO has been the most successful mili-
tary alliance in history and, for over seven decades, 
an example of successful political cooperation. 
(3) NATO’s commitment to collective defense is 
essential to deter security threat against its mem-
bers. 
(4) NATO strengthens the security of the 
United States by enabling United States forces to 
work by, with, and through a network of committed, 
interoperable allies. 
(5) NATO solidarity sends a clear collective 
message to Russia that members of the alliance will 
not tolerate aggressive acts that threaten their secu-
rity and sovereignty. 
(6) In response to changing national security 
threats, NATO continues to adapt to take on new 
dynamics such as terrorism, hybrid warfare, the 
spread of weapons of mass destruction, and cyber 
attacks. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) the United States reaffirms its commitment 
to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01156
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1157 
HR 6395 PCS
foundation of transatlantic security and defense , in-
cluding Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty; and 
(2) NATO plays a critical role in preserving 
peace and stability in the transatlantic region. 
SEC. 1243. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON SUPPORT FOR COORDI-
NATED ACTION TO ENSURE THE SECURITY 
OF BALTIC ALLIES. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the continued security of the Baltic states 
of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania is critical to 
achieving United States national security interests 
and defense objectives against the acute and formi-
dable threat posed by Russia; 
(2) the United States and the Baltic states are 
leaders in the mission of defending independence 
and democracy from aggression and in promoting 
stability and security within the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization (NATO), with non-NATO part-
ners, and with other international organizations such 
as the European Union; 
(3) the Baltic states are model NATO allies in 
terms of burden sharing and capital investment in 
materiel critical to United States and allied security, 
investment of over 2 percent of their gross domestic 
product on defense expenditure, allocating over 20 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01157
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1158 
HR 6395 PCS
percent of their defense budgets on capital mod-
ernization, matching security assistance from the 
United States, frequently deploying their forces 
around the world in support of allied and United 
States objectives, and sharing diplomatic, technical, 
military, and analytical expertise on defense and se-
curity matters; 
(4) the United States should continue to 
strengthen bilateral and multilateral defense by, 
with, and through allied nations, particularly those 
which possess expertise and dexterity but do not 
enjoy the benefits of national economies of scale; 
(5) the United States should pursue consistent 
efforts focused on defense and security assistance, 
coordination, and planning designed to ensure the 
continued security of the Baltic states and on deter-
ring current and future challenges to the national 
sovereignty of United States allies and partners in 
the Baltic region; and 
(6) such an initiative should include an innova-
tive and comprehensive conflict deterrence strategy 
for the Baltic region encompassing the unique geog-
raphy of the Baltic states, modern and diffuse 
threats to their land, sea, and air spaces, and nec-
essary improvements to their defense posture, in-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01158
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1159 
HR 6395 PCS
cluding command-and-control infrastructure, intel-
ligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities, 
communications equipment and networks, and spe-
cial forces. 
SEC. 1244. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON SUPPORT FOR ESTO-
NIA, LATVIA, AND LITHUANIA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and 
Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United 
States, and they have repeatedly demonstrated their 
commitment to advancing our mutual interests as 
well as those of the NATO Alliance. 
(2) Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of ex-
ercises and coordinating efforts demonstrating the 
United States’ commitment to its European partners 
and allies, including the Baltic countries of Estonia, 
Latvia, and Lithuania, with the shared goal of peace 
and stability in the region. Operation Atlantic Re-
solve strengthens communication and understanding, 
and is an important effort to deter Russian aggres-
sion in the region. 
(3) Through Operation Atlantic Resolve, the 
European Deterrence Initiative undertakes exercises, 
training, and rotational presence necessary to reas-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01159
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1160 
HR 6395 PCS
sure and integrate our allies, including the Baltic 
countries, into a common defense framework. 
(4) All three Baltic countries contributed to the 
NATO-led International Security Assistance Force 
in Afghanistan, sending troops and operating with 
few caveats. The Baltic countries continue to commit 
resources and troops to the Resolute Support Mis-
sion in Afghanistan. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—Congress— 
(1) reaffirms its support for the principle of col-
lective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic 
Treaty for our NATO allies, including Estonia, Lat-
via, and Lithuania; 
(2) supports the sovereignty, independence, ter-
ritorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, 
and Lithuania as well as their internationally recog-
nized borders, and expresses concerns over increas-
ingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Rus-
sian Federation near their borders and airspace; 
(3) expresses concern over and condemns sub-
versive and destabilizing activities by the Russian 
Federation within the Baltic countries; and 
(4) encourages the Administration to further 
enhance defense cooperation efforts with Estonia, 
Latvia, and Lithuania and supports the efforts of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01160
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1161 
HR 6395 PCS
their Governments to provide for the defense of their 
people and sovereign territory. 
SEC. 1245. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON SUPPORT FOR GEOR-
GIA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Georgia is a valued friend of the United 
States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commit-
ment to advancing the mutual interests of both 
countries, including the deployment of Georgian 
forces as part of the former International Security 
Assistance Force (ISAF) and the current Resolute 
Support Mission led by the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization (NATO) in Afghanistan and the Multi- 
National Force in Iraq. 
(2) The European Deterrence Initiative builds 
the partnership capacity of Georgia so it can work 
more closely with the United States and NATO, as 
well as provide for its own defense. 
(3) In addition to the European Deterrence Ini-
tiative, Georgia’s participation in the NATO initia-
tive Partnership for Peace is paramount to inter-
operability with the United States and NATO, and 
establishing a more peaceful environment in the re-
gion. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01161
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1162 
HR 6395 PCS
(4) Despite the losses suffered, as a NATO 
partner, Georgia is committed to the Resolute Sup-
port Mission in Afghanistan with the fifth-largest 
contingent on the ground. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the United States should— 
(1) reaffirm support for an enduring strategic 
partnership between the United States and Georgia; 
(2) support Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial 
integrity within its internationally-recognized bor-
ders, and does not recognize the independence of the 
Abkhazia and South Ossetia regions currently occu-
pied by the Russian Federation; 
(3) continue support for multi-domain security 
assistance for Georgia in the form of lethal and non- 
lethal measures to build resiliency, bolster deterrence 
against Russian aggression, and promote stability in 
the region, by— 
(A) strengthening defensive capabilities 
and promote readiness; and 
(B) improving interoperability with NATO 
forces; and 
(4) further enhance security cooperation and 
engagement with Georgia and other Black Sea re-
gional partners. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01162
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1163 
HR 6395 PCS
SEC. 1246. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON BURDEN SHARING BY 
PARTNERS AND ALLIES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings: 
(1) The United States’ alliances and other crit-
ical defense partnerships are a cornerstone of De-
partment of Defense (DOD) efforts to deter aggres-
sion from our adversaries, counter violent extre-
mism, and preserve United States national security 
interests in the face of challenges to those interests 
by Russia, China and other actors. 
(2) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
(NATO) is the most successful military alliance in 
history, having deterred war between major state 
powers for more than 70 years. 
(3) Collective security and the responsibility of 
each member of the security of the other members 
as well as the alliance as a whole is a pillar of the 
NATO alliance. 
(4) NATO members other than the United 
States collectively expend over $300,000,000,000 in 
defense investments annually and maintain military 
forces totaling an estimated 1,900,000 service mem-
bers, bolstering the alliance’s collective capacity to 
counter shared threats. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01163
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1164 
HR 6395 PCS
(5) At the NATO Wales Summit in 2014, 
NATO members pledged to strive to increase their 
own defense spending to 2 percent of their respective 
gross domestic products and to spend at least 20 
percent of their defense budgets on equipment by 
2024 as part of their burden sharing commitments. 
(6) Since 2014, there has been a steady in-
crease in allied defense spending, with 22 member 
countries meeting defense spending targets in 2018 
and having submitted plans to meet the targets by 
2024. 
(7) In addition to individual defense spending 
contributions, NATO allies and partners also con-
tribute to NATO and United States operations 
around the world, including the Resolute Support 
Mission in Afghanistan and the Global Coalition to 
Defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). 
(8) South Korea hosts a baseline of 28,500 
United States forces including the Eighth Army and 
Seventh Air Force. 
(9) South Korea maintains Aegis Ballistic Mis-
sile Defense and Patriot Batteries that contribute to 
regional Ballistic Missile Defense, is a participant in 
the Enforcement Coordination Center, and is a sig-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01164
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
1188 
HR 6395 PCS
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required under 
paragraph (1) shall, with respect to each rec-
ommendation in the report described in paragraph 
(1) that the Secretary of Defense has implemented 
or intends to implement, include— 
(A) a summary of actions that have been 
or will be taken to implement the recommenda-
tion; and 
(B) a schedule, with specific milestones, 
for completing implementation of the rec-
ommendation. 
(b) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees the plan required under subsection (a). 
(c) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), not later than 18 months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of De-
fense shall carry out activities to implement the plan 
developed under subsection (a). 
(2) EXCEPTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CER-
TAIN RECOMMENDATIONS.— 
(A) 
DELAYED
IMPLEMENTATION.—The 
Secretary of Defense may initiate implementa-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 01188
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3154 
HR 6395 PCS
‘‘Sewemup Mesa Proposed Wilderness’’, dated No-
vember 7, 2019, which shall be known as the 
Sewemup Mesa Wilderness. 
(10) Certain lands managed by the Kremmling 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 31 acres, as generally 
depicted on a map titled ‘‘Platte River Addition Pro-
posed Wilderness’’, dated July 20, 2018, and which 
are hereby incorporated in and shall be deemed to 
be part of the Platte River Wilderness designated by 
Public Law 98–550. 
(11) 
Certain 
lands 
managed 
by 
the 
Uncompahgre Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management, which comprise approximately 17,587 
acres, as generally depicted on a map titled 
‘‘Roubideau Proposed Wilderness’’, dated October 9, 
2019, which shall be known as the Roubideau Wil-
derness. 
(12) 
Certain 
lands 
managed 
by 
the 
Uncompahgre Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management or located in the Grand Mesa, 
Uncompaghre, and Gunnison National Forests, 
which comprise approximately 12,102 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Norwood Canyon 
Proposed Wilderness’’, dated November 7, 2019, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 03154
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3155 
HR 6395 PCS
which shall be known as the Norwood Canyon Wil-
derness. 
(13) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 24,475 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Papoose & Cross 
Canyon Proposed Wilderness’’, and dated January 
29, 2020, which shall be known as the Cross Canyon 
Wilderness. 
(14) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 21,220 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘McKenna Peak Pro-
posed Wilderness’’, dated October 16, 2019, which 
shall be known as the McKenna Peak Wilderness. 
(15) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 14,270 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Weber-Menefee 
Mountain Proposed Wilderness’’, dated October 9, 
2019, which shall be known as the Weber-Menefee 
Mountain Wilderness. 
(16) 
Certain 
lands 
managed 
by 
the 
Uncompahgre and Tres Rios Field Offices of the 
Bureau of Land Management or the Bureau of Rec-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 03155
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3156 
HR 6395 PCS
lamation, which comprise approximately 33,351 
acres, as generally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Dolores 
River Canyon Proposed Wilderness’’, dated Novem-
ber 7, 2019, which shall be known as the Dolores 
River Canyon Wilderness. 
(17) Certain lands managed by the Royal Gorge 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management or 
located in the Pike and San Isabel National Forests, 
which comprise approximately 17,922 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Browns Canyon 
Proposed Wilderness’’, dated October 9, 2019, which 
shall be known as the Browns Canyon Wilderness. 
(18) Certain lands managed by the San Luis 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 10,527 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘San Luis Hills Pro-
posed Wilderness’’, dated October 9, 2019 which 
shall be known as the San Luis Hills Wilderness. 
(19) Certain lands managed by the Royal Gorge 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
which comprise approximately 23,559 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Table Mountain & 
McIntyre Hills Proposed Wilderness’’, dated Novem-
ber 7, 2019, which shall be known as the Table 
Mountain Wilderness. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 03156
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3157 
HR 6395 PCS
(20) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management or 
located in the San Juan National Forest, which 
comprise approximately 10,844 acres, as generally 
depicted on a map titled ‘‘North & South Ponderosa 
Gorge Proposed Wilderness’’, and dated January 31, 
2020, which shall be known as the North Ponderosa 
Gorge Wilderness. 
(21) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management or 
located in the San Juan National Forest, which 
comprise approximately 12,393 acres, as generally 
depicted on a map titled ‘‘North & South Ponderosa 
Gorge Proposed Wilderness’’, and dated January 31, 
2020 which shall be known as the South Ponderosa 
Gorge Wilderness. 
(22) Certain lands managed by the Little Snake 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
which comprise approximately 33,168 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Diamond Breaks 
Proposed Wilderness’’, and dated January 31, 2020 
which shall be known as the Diamond Breaks Wil-
derness. 
(23) Certain lands managed by the Tres Rios 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 03157
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6395.PCS
H6395
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS