datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be deter-
mined to be particularly suitable for sporting pur-
poses solely because the firearm is suitable for use 
in a sporting event.’’.
(b) RELATED DEFINITIONS.—Section 921(a) of such 
title is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(36) BARREL SHROUD.—The term ‘barrel shroud’ 
means a shroud that is attached to, or partially or com-
pletely encircles, the barrel of a firearm so that the shroud 
protects the user of the firearm from heat generated by 
the barrel, but does not include a slide that encloses the 
barrel, and does not include an extension of the stock 
along the bottom of the barrel which does not encircle or 
substantially encircle the barrel. 
‘‘(37) CONVERSION KIT.—The term ‘conversion kit’ 
means any part or combination of parts designed and in-
tended for use in converting a firearm into a semiauto-
matic assault weapon, and any combination of parts from 
which a semiautomatic assault weapon can be assembled 
if the parts are in the possession or under the control of 
a person. 
‘‘(38) DETACHABLE MAGAZINE.—The term ‘detach-
able magazine’ means an ammunition feeding device that 
can readily be inserted into a firearm.
HR 2023 RDS 
SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS COMMENDING CDC FOR ITS 
STRATEGIES 
FOR 
ADDRESSING 
ASTHMA 
WITHIN A COORDINATED SCHOOL HEALTH 
PROGRAM. 
The Congress— 
(1) commends the Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention for identifying and creating ‘‘Strate-
gies for Addressing Asthma Within a Coordinated 
School Program’’ for schools to address asthma; and 
(2) encourages all schools to review these strat-
egies and adopt policies that will best meet the needs 
of their student population. 
Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 
2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2030
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 11, 2003
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, 
as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 3. RIGHT TO ALTER, AMEND, OR REPEAL. 
The Congress expressly reserves the right to alter, 
amend, or repeal this Act.
Æ
V 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2027
For the relief of Zdanko Lisak. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 7, 2003
Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
For the relief of Zdanko Lisak.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR 
DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, ZDANKO LISAK. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 
and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Zdanko Lisak may not be removed from the United 
States, or denied admission to the United States, by rea-
son of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial 
of admission and is reflected in the records of the Immi-
gration and Naturalization Service of the Department of
Justice, or the Visa Office of the Department of State, 
on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE-
MOVAL.—The Attorney General shall rescind any out-
standing order of removal or deportation, or any finding 
of deportability, that has been entered against Zdanko 
Lisak by reason of any act described in subsection (a).
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4949
To provide compensation to the Lower Brule and Crow Creek Sioux Tribes 
of South Dakota for damage to tribal land caused by Pick-Sloan projects 
along the Missouri River. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 22, 2004
Ms. HERSETH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To provide compensation to the Lower Brule and Crow Creek 
Sioux Tribes of South Dakota for damage to tribal land 
caused by Pick-Sloan projects along the Missouri River.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Parity Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds that—
(1) the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Pro-
gram (authorized by section 9 of the Act of Decem-
ber 22, 1944 (commonly known as the ‘‘Flood Con-
trol Act of 1944’’) (58 Stat. 891)), was approved to 
promote the general economic development of the 
United States; 
(2) the Fort Randall and Big Bend dam and 
reservoir projects in South Dakota—
(A) are major components of the Pick-
Sloan Missouri River Basin Program; and 
(B) contribute to the national economy; 
(3) the Fort Randall and Big Bend projects in-
undated the fertile bottom land of the Lower Brule 
and Crow Creek Sioux Tribes, which greatly dam-
aged the economy and cultural resources of the 
Tribes; 
(4) Congress has provided compensation to sev-
eral Indian tribes, including the Lower Brule and 
Crow Creek Sioux Tribes, that border the Missouri 
River and suffered injury as a result of 1 or more 
Pick-Sloan Projects; 
(5) the compensation provided to those Indian 
tribes has not been consistent; 
(6) Missouri River Indian tribes that suffered 
injury as a result of 1 or more Pick-Sloan Projects 
should be adequately compensated for those injuries, 
and that compensation should be consistent among 
the Tribes; and
(7) the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and the Crow 
Creek Sioux Tribe, based on methodology deter-
mined appropriate by the General Accounting Office, 
are entitled to receive additional compensation for 
injuries described in paragraph (6), so as to provide 
parity among compensation received by all Missouri 
River Indian tribes. 
SEC. 3. LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE. 
Section 4(b) of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Infra-
structure Development Trust Fund Act (Public Law 105–
132; 
111 
Stat. 
2565) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$39,300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$186,822,140’’. 
SEC. 4. CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE. 
Section 4(b) of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Infra-
structure Development Trust Fund Act of 1996 (Public 
Law 104–223; 110 Stat. 3027) is amended by striking 
‘‘$27,500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$105,917,853’’.
Æ
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pledge Protection Act
of 2004’’.
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any
jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel-
late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining
to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu-
tion of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4
of title 4, or its recitation.’’. The limitation in this section
shall not apply to the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
item:
‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 23,
2004.
Attest:
Clerk.
II 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2028 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 
Received 
AN ACT 
To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to 
the jurisdiction of Federal courts over certain cases and 
controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 2028 RDS 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pledge Protection Act 
of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction 
‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any 
jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel-
late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining 
to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu-
tion of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4 
of title 4, or its recitation.’’. The limitation in this section 
shall not apply to the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States
HR 2028 RDS 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
item: 
‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 
2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
HR 2030 RFS 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 
The facility of the United States Postal Service lo-
cated at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, shall 
be known and designated as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink 
Post Office Building’’. 
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction 
‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any 
jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate 
jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining to 
the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitution 
of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4 of title 
4, or its recitation.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 
‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’. 
Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend title 
28, United States Code, with respect to the jurisdiction 
of Federal courts over certain cases and controversies in-
volving the Pledge of Allegiance.’’.
Union Calendar No. 424 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2028 
[Report No. 108–691] 
A BILL 
To amend title 28, United States Code, with re-
spect to the jurisdiction of Federal courts inferior 
to the Supreme Court over certain cases and con-
troversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance. 
SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee 
of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and or-
dered to be printed
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2029
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that long-term 
vehicle storage by tax-exempt organizations which conduct county and 
similar fairs shall not be treated as an unrelated trade or business. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 8, 2003
Mr. CAMP (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
that long-term vehicle storage by tax-exempt organiza-
tions which conduct county and similar fairs shall not 
be treated as an unrelated trade or business.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Fairness for Coun-
ty Fairs Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF LONG-TERM VEHICLE STORAGE BY 
ORGANIZATIONS 
CONDUCTING 
COUNTY 
FAIRS, ETC. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 513 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining unrelated 
trade or business) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(5) VEHICLE STORAGE.—The term ‘unrelated 
trade or business’ shall not include any activity—
‘‘(A) which is conducted by a qualifying or-
ganization described in paragraph (2)(C), and 
‘‘(B) which consists of providing storage 
(for periods of not less than 1 month) for vehi-
cles, boats, and trailers on the grounds of the 
fair or exposition referred to in such para-
graph.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to activities in taxable years begin-
ning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 202
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an inflation 
adjustment of the base amounts used in determining the amount of 
Social Security benefits included in gross income. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2003
Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
for an inflation adjustment of the base amounts used 
in determining the amount of Social Security benefits 
included in gross income.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF BASE AMOUNTS 
USED IN DETERMINING AMOUNT OF SOCIAL 
SECURITY BENEFITS INCLUDED IN GROSS IN-
COME. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 86 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to base amount
and adjusted base amount) is amended by adding at the 
end thereof the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the case of 
any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 
2003, each dollar amount contained in paragraphs 
(1) and (2) shall be increased by an amount equal 
to—
‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter-
mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 
year in which the taxable year begins, by sub-
stituting ‘calendar year 2002’ for ‘calendar year 
1992’. 
If any increase determined under the preceding sen-
tence is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall 
be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2003.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 494
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a full deduction 
for meals and lodging in connection with medical care. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 29, 2003
Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 
full deduction for meals and lodging in connection with 
medical care.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FULL DEDUCTION FOR MEALS AND LODGING 
IN CONNECTION WITH MEDICAL CARE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 213(d) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts 
paid for certain lodging away from home treated as paid 
for medical care) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘MEALS AND’’ before ‘‘LODG-
ING’’ in the heading,
(2) by inserting ‘‘meals and’’ before ‘‘lodging’’ 
in the text, and 
(3) by striking the last sentence. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
in this title. There are hereby appropriated to the 
Fund, out of any moneys in the Treasury not other-
wise appropriated, amounts equivalent to 100 per-
cent of—
‘‘(A) the taxes imposed by section 3451 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect 
to wages reported to the Secretary of the 
Treasury or the Secretary ’s delegate pursuant 
to subtitle F of such Code, as determined by 
the Secretary of the Treasury by applying the 
applicable rates of tax under such sections to 
such wages, which wages shall be certified by 
the Commissioner of Social Security on the 
basis of records of wages established and main-
tained by such Commissioner in accordance 
with such reports; 
‘‘(B) the taxes imposed by section 1401(c) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with re-
spect to self-employment income reported to the 
Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary ’s 
delegate pursuant to subtitle F of such Code, as 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury by 
applying the applicable rates of tax under such 
sections to such self-employment income, which 
self-employment income shall be certified by the
Commissioner of Social Security on the basis of 
records of self-employment established and 
maintained by such Commissioner in accord-
ance with such returns; and 
‘‘(C) the excess of the amounts imposed 
under section 59B of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 over the amounts of credits al-
lowed under section 36. 
The amounts appropriated by the preceding sentence 
shall be transferred from time to time from the gen-
eral fund in the Treasury to the Trust Fund, such 
amounts to be determined on the basis of estimates 
by the Secretary of the Treasury of the taxes, speci-
fied in the preceding sentence, paid to or deposited 
into the Treasury; and proper adjustments shall be 
made in amounts subsequently transferred to the ex-
tent prior estimates were in excess of or were less 
than the taxes specified in such sentence. 
‘‘(3) APPLICATION
OF
TRUST
FUND
PROVI-
SIONS.—The provisions of subsections (b) through 
(f) of section 1817 shall apply to the Trust Fund in 
the same manner as they apply to the Federal Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund, except that, for pur-
poses of this paragraph, any reference in such sub-
sections to a provision of the Internal Revenue Code
108TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2030
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii,
as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service lo-
cated at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, shall
be known and designated as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink
Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 2030
One Hundred Eighth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE FIRST SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the seventh day of January, two thousand and three
An Act
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 Baldwin
Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service located at
120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, shall be known and
designated as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,
or other record of the United States to the facility referred to
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Patsy
Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2030
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto 
Mink Post Office Building’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 8, 2003
Mr. CASE (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. PELOSI, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, 
Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. LEE, Mr. HONDA, Mrs. 
NAPOLITANO, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. WATSON, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, 
Mr. SERRANO, Mr. TIERNEY, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. THOMP-
SON of California, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. 
FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. FROST, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Ms. LOFGREN, 
Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. OWENS, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. PAYNE, 
Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. STARK, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. 
KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. WU, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. 
REYES, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. THOMPSON of Mis-
sissippi, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. SCOTT of 
Virginia, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. SKELTON, 
Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, 
Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. 
DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HOEFFEL, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. BALD-
WIN, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. EVANS, Ms. CARSON of 
Indiana, Mr. WATT, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. WEINER, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. 
MCNULTY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. WYNN, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. BRADY of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. SANDLIN, Ms. SOLIS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 
MALONEY, Mr. BACA, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. WATERS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 
Mr. FARR, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. OBEY, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. 
OSBORNE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. BER-
MAN, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Government Reform 
A BILL 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, 
as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PATSY TAKEMOTO MINK POST OFFICE BUILD-
ING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, 
Maui, Hawaii, shall be known and designated as the 
‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the Patsy Takemoto Mink 
Post Office Building.
Æ
waiver under section 1915, section 1115, or 
otherwise; and 
‘‘(B) is provided to individuals with disabil-
ities or elderly individuals for a fiscal year,
shall not be less than the level of such expenditures 
for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which 
the State plan amendment to provide community-
based attendant services and supports in accordance 
with this section is approved. 
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS FOR ENHANCED FMAP FOR 
EARLY COVERAGE.—In addition to satisfying the other re-
quirements for an approved plan amendment under this 
section, in order for a State to be eligible under subsection 
(a)(2) during the period described in that subsection for 
the enhanced FMAP for early coverage under subsection 
(a)(2), the State shall satisfy the following requirements: 
‘‘(1) SPECIFICATIONS.—With respect to a fiscal 
year, the State shall provide the Secretary with the 
following specifications regarding the provision of 
community-based attendant services and supports 
under the plan for that fiscal year: 
‘‘(A)(i) The number of individuals who are 
estimated to receive community-based attendant 
services and supports under the plan during the 
fiscal year.