790 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(3) continue to rapidly advance missile defense 
technologies to improve the capability and reliability 
of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the 
ballistic missile defense system. 
(c) DEPLOYMENT.—Not later than December 31, 2021, 
the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) execute any requisite construction to ensure 
that Missile Field 1 or Missile Field 2 at Fort Greely 
or alternative missile fields at Fort Greely which may 
be identified pursuant to subsection (b), are capable 
of supporting and sustaining additional ground-based 
interceptors; 
(2) deploy up to 14 additional ground-based 
interceptors to Missile Field 1 or up to 20 additional 
ground-based interceptors to an alternative missile 
field at Fort Greely as soon as technically feasible; 
and 
(3) identify a ground-based interceptor stockpile 
storage site for the remaining ground-based intercep-
tors required by subsection (b). 
(d) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Unless otherwise directed or 
recommended by the Ballistic Missile Defense Review 
(BMDR), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees,
791 
† HR 2810 EAS 
not later than 90 days after the completion of the 
Ballistic Missile Defense Review, a report on options 
to increase the capability, capacity, and reliability of 
the ground-based midcourse defense element of the bal-
listic missile defense system and the infrastructure re-
quirements for increasing the number of ground-based 
interceptors in currently feasible locations across the 
United States. 
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required by para-
graph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) An identification of potential sites in 
the United States, whether existing or new on the 
East Coast or in the Midwest, for the deployment 
of 104 ground-based interceptors. 
(B) A cost-benefit analysis of each such site, 
including tactical, operational, and cost-to-con-
struct considerations. 
(C) A description of any completed and out-
standing environmental assessments or impact 
statements for each such site. 
(D) A description of the existing capacity of 
the missile fields at Fort Greely and the infra-
structure requirements needed to increase the 
number of ground-based interceptors to 20 
ground-based interceptors each.
792 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(E) A description of the additional infra-
structure and components needed to further out-
fit missile fields at Fort Greely before emplacing 
additional ground-based interceptors configured 
with the redesigned kill vehicle, including with 
respect to ground excavation, silos, utilities, and 
support equipment. 
(F) A cost estimate of such infrastructure 
and components. 
(G) An estimated schedule for completing 
such construction as may be required for such 
infrastructure and components. 
(H) An identification of any environmental 
assessments or impact studies that would need to 
be conducted to expand such missile fields at 
Fort Greely beyond current capacity. 
(I) An operational evaluation and cost 
analysis of the deployment of transportable 
ground-based interceptors, including an identi-
fication of potential sites, including in the east-
ern United States and at Vandenberg Air Force 
Base, and an examination of any environmental, 
legal, or tactical challenges associated with such 
deployments, including to any sites identified in 
subparagraph (A).
793 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(J) A determination of the appropriate fleet 
mix of ground-based interceptor kill vehicles and 
boosters to maximize overall system effectiveness 
and increase its capacity and capability, includ-
ing the costs and benefits of continued inclusion 
of capability enhancement II (CE–II) Block 1 
interceptors after the fielding of the redesigned 
kill vehicle. 
(K) A description of the planned improve-
ments to homeland ballistic missile defense sen-
sor and discrimination capabilities and an as-
sessment of the expected operational benefits of 
such improvements to homeland ballistic missile 
defense. 
(L) The benefit of supplementing ground- 
based midcourse defense elements with other, 
more distributed, elements, including both Aegis 
ships and Aegis Ashore installations with Stand-
ard Missile-3 Block IIA and other interceptors in 
Hawaii and at other locations for homeland mis-
sile defense. 
(3) FORM.—The report submitted under para-
graph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
may include a classified annex.
794 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1654. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE STATE OF 
UNITED STATES MISSILE DEFENSE. 
It is the sense of the Senate that— 
(1) the Secretary of Defense should use the Bal-
listic Missile Defense Review (BMDR) to consider ac-
celerating the development of technologies that will in-
crease the capacity, capability, and reliability of the 
ground-based midcourse defense element of the bal-
listic missile defense system; 
(2) upon completion of the Ballistic Missile De-
fense Review, the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency should, to the extent practicable and with 
sound acquisition practices, accelerate the develop-
ment, testing, and fielding of such capabilities as they 
are prioritized in the Ballistic Missile Defense Re-
view, including the redesigned kill vehicle, the multi- 
object kill vehicle, the C3 booster, a space-based sensor 
layer, boost phase sensor and kill technologies, and 
additional ground-based interceptors; and 
(3) in order to achieve these objectives, and to 
avoid post-production and post-deployment problems, 
it is essential for the Department of Defense and the 
Missile Defense Agency to follow a ‘‘fly before you 
buy’’ approach to adequately test and assess the ele-
ments of the ballistic missile defense system before 
final production decisions or operational deployment.
795 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1655. SENSE OF THE SENATE AND REPORT ON 
GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE TEST-
ING. 
(a) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the Sen-
ate that— 
(1) at a minimum, the Missile Defense Agency 
should continue to flight test the ground-based mid-
course defense element at least once each fiscal year; 
(2) the Department of Defense should allocate in-
creased funding to homeland missile defense testing to 
ensure that our defenses continue to evolve faster than 
the threats against which they are postured to defend; 
(3) in order to rapidly innovate, develop, and 
field new technologies, the Director of the Missile De-
fense Agency should continue to focus testing cam-
paigns on delivering increased capabilities to the 
Armed Forces as quickly as possible; and 
(4) the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 
should seek to establish a more prudent balance be-
tween risk mitigation and the more rapid testing pace 
needed to quickly develop and deliver new capabilities 
to the Armed Forces. 
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the con-
796 
† HR 2810 EAS 
gressional defense committees a revised missile defense 
testing campaign plan that accelerates the develop-
ment and deployment of new missile defense tech-
nologies. 
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required by para-
graph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) A detailed analysis of the acceleration 
of each of following programs: 
(i) Redesigned kill vehicle. 
(ii) Multi-object kill vehicle. 
(iii) Configuration-3 Booster. 
(iv) Lasers mounted on small un-
manned aerial vehicles. 
(v) Space-based missile defense sensor 
architecture. 
(vi) Such additional technologies as the 
Director considers appropriate. 
(B) A new deployment timeline for each of 
the programs in listed in subparagraph (A) or a 
detailed description of why the current timeline 
for deployment technologies under those pro-
grams is most suitable. 
(C) An identification of any funding or pol-
icy restrictions that would slow down the deploy-
797 
† HR 2810 EAS 
ment of the technologies under the programs list-
ed in subparagraph (A). 
(D) A risk assessment of the potential cost- 
overruns and deployment delays that may be en-
countered in the expedited development process of 
the capabilities under paragraph (1). 
(c) REPORT
ON FUNDING PROFILE.—The Director 
shall include with the budget justification materials sub-
mitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2019 (as submitted with the 
budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, 
United States Code) a report on the funding profile nec-
essary for the new testing campaign plan required by sub-
section (b)(1). 
Subtitle F—Cyber Scholarship 
Opportunities 
SEC. 1661. SHORT TITLE. 
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Cyber Scholarship 
Opportunities Act of 2017’’. 
SEC. 1662. COMMUNITY COLLEGE CYBER PILOT PROGRAM 
AND ASSESSMENT. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—Not later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this subtitle, as part of the Federal 
Cyber Scholarship-for-Service program established under 
section 302 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014
798 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(15 U.S.C. 7442), the Director of the National Science 
Foundation, in coordination with the Director of the Office 
of Personnel Management, shall develop and implement a 
pilot program at not more than 10, but at least 5, commu-
nity colleges to provide scholarships to eligible students 
who— 
(1) are pursuing associate degrees or specialized 
program certifications in the field of cybersecurity; 
and 
(2)(A) have bachelor’s degrees; or 
(B) are veterans of the armed forces. 
(b) ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 
of enactment of this subtitle, as part of the Federal Cyber 
Scholarship-for-Service program established under section 
302 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 
U.S.C. 7442), the Director of the National Science Founda-
tion, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Per-
sonnel Management, shall assess the potential benefits and 
feasibility of providing scholarships through community 
colleges to eligible students who are pursuing associate de-
grees, but do not have bachelor’s degrees. 
SEC. 1663. FEDERAL CYBER SCHOLARSHIP-FOR SERVICE 
PROGRAM UPDATES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 302 of the Cybersecurity 
Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7442) is amended—
799 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) by striking subsection (b)(3) and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(3) prioritize the employment placement of at 
least 80 percent of scholarship recipients in an execu-
tive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 5, 
United States Code); and 
‘‘(4) provide awards to improve cybersecurity 
education at the kindergarten through grade 12 
level— 
‘‘(A) to increase interest in cybersecurity 
careers; 
‘‘(B) to help students practice correct and 
safe 
online 
behavior 
and 
understand 
the 
foundational principles of cybersecurity; 
‘‘(C) to improve teaching methods for deliv-
ering cybersecurity content for kindergarten 
through grade 12 computer science curricula; 
and 
‘‘(D) to promote teacher recruitment in the 
field of cybersecurity.’’; 
(2) by amending subsection (d) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(d) POST-AWARD EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS.—Each 
scholarship recipient, as a condition of receiving a scholar-
ship under the program, shall enter into an agreement
800 
† HR 2810 EAS 
under which the recipient agrees to work for a period equal 
to the length of the scholarship, following receipt of the stu-
dent’s degree, in the cybersecurity mission of— 
‘‘(1) an executive agency (as defined in section 
105 of title 5, United States Code); 
‘‘(2) Congress, including any agency, entity, of-
fice, or commission established in the legislative 
branch; 
‘‘(3) an interstate agency; 
‘‘(4) a State, local, or tribal government; or 
‘‘(5) a State, local, or tribal government-affili-
ated non-profit that is considered to be critical infra-
structure (as defined in section 1016(e) of the USA 
Patriot Act (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)).’’; 
(3) in subsection (f)— 
(A) by amending paragraph (3) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(3) have demonstrated a high level of com-
petency in relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities, as 
defined by the national cybersecurity awareness and 
education program under section 401;’’; and 
(B) by amending paragraph (4) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(4) be a full-time student in an eligible degree 
program at a qualified institution of higher edu-
801 
† HR 2810 EAS 
cation, as determined by the Director of the National 
Science Foundation, except that in the case of a stu-
dent who is enrolled in a community college, be a stu-
dent pursuing a degree on a less than full-time basis, 
but not less than half-time basis; and’’; and 
(4) by amending subsection (m) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(m) PUBLIC INFORMATION.— 
‘‘(1) EVALUATION.—The Director of the National 
Science Foundation, in coordination with the Direc-
tor of the Office of Personnel Management, shall peri-
odically evaluate and make public, in a manner that 
protects the personally identifiable information of 
scholarship recipients, information on the success of 
recruiting individuals for scholarships under this sec-
tion and on hiring and retaining those individuals in 
the public sector cyber workforce, including on— 
‘‘(A) placement rates; 
‘‘(B) where students are placed, including 
job titles and descriptions; 
‘‘(C) student salary ranges for students not 
released from obligations under this section; 
‘‘(D) how long after graduation they are 
placed;
802 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(E) how long they stay in the positions 
they enter upon graduation; 
‘‘(F) how many students are released from 
obligations; and 
‘‘(G) what, if any, remedial training is re-
quired. 
‘‘(2) REPORTS.—The Director of the National 
Science Foundation, in coordination with the Office 
of Personnel Management, shall submit, at least once 
every 3 years, to the Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 
House of Representatives a report, including the re-
sults of the evaluation under paragraph (1) and any 
recent statistics regarding the size, composition, and 
educational requirements of the Federal cyber work-
force. 
‘‘(3) RESOURCES.—The Director of the National 
Science Foundation, in coordination with the Direc-
tor of the Office of Personnel Management, shall pro-
vide consolidated and user-friendly online resources 
for prospective scholarship recipients, including, to 
the extent practicable— 
‘‘(A) searchable, up-to-date, and accurate 
information about participating institutions of
803 
† HR 2810 EAS 
higher education and job opportunities related to 
the field of cybersecurity; and 
‘‘(B) a modernized description of cybersecu-
rity careers.’’. 
(b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section, or 
an amendment made by this section, shall affect any agree-
ment, scholarship, loan, or repayment, under section 302 
of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 
7442), in effect on the day before the date of enactment of 
this subtitle. 
SEC. 1664. CYBERSECURITY TEACHING. 
Section 10(i) of the National Science Foundation Au-
thorization Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 1862n–1(i)) is amend-
ed— 
(1) by amending paragraph (5) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(5) the term ‘mathematics and science teacher’ 
means a science, technology, engineering, mathe-
matics, or computer science, including cybersecurity, 
teacher at the elementary school or secondary school 
level;’’; and 
(2) by amending paragraph (7) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(7) the term ‘science, technology, engineering, or 
mathematics professional’ means an individual who
804 
† HR 2810 EAS 
holds a baccalaureate, master’s, or doctoral degree in 
science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or com-
puter science, including cybersecurity, and is working 
in or had a career in such field or a related area; 
and’’. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER FIVE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military 
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 
on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2022; or
805 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2023. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 
Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated 
before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2022; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2023 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
(c) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF FISCAL YEAR 
2016 AND FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECTS.— 
(1) FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECTS.—Section 2002 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 
129 Stat. 1145) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)—
806 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking 
‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2020’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 
‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking 
‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2020’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 
‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’. 
(2) FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECTS.—Section 2002 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328; 
129 Stat. 1145) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking 
‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 
‘‘2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking 
‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 
‘‘2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’.
807 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2017; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2103(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort Rucker ........................................................
$38,000,000 
Arizona ......................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .......................
$22,000,000 
Fort Huachuca ..................................................
$30,000,000 
California ..................
Fort Irwin ..........................................................
$3,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ........................................................
$29,300,000 
Florida .......................
Eglin Air Force Base ........................................
$18,000,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning .....................................................
$38,800,000 
Fort Gordon .......................................................
$51,500,000 
Hawaii .......................
Pohakuloa Training Area .................................
$25,000,000 
Indiana ......................
Crane Army Ammunition Plant ......................
$24,000,000 
New York ....................
United States Military Academy .....................
$22,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$60,000,000 
Shaw Air Force Base ........................................
$25,000,000 
Texas ..........................
Camp Bullis .......................................................
$13,600,000 
Fort Hood ..........................................................
$70,000,000 
Virginia .....................
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ...............................
$34,000,000 
Joint Base Myer-Henderson .............................
$20,000,000 
Washington ................
Yakima ...............................................................
$19,500,000
808 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out the military con-
struction project for the installations or locations outside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany .......................
Stuttgart ..........................................................
$40,000,000 
Weisbaden ........................................................
$43,000,000 
Korea .............................
Kunsan Air Base ............................................
$53,000,000 
Turkey ...........................
Various Locations ...........................................
$6,400,000 
(c) CERTIFICATION
REQUIREMENT
FOR
CERTAIN 
PROJECTS.—The Secretary of the Army may not exercise 
the authority provided under subsection (a) with respect to 
the Fort Rucker, Alabama, or the Fort Benning, Georgia, 
projects set forth in the table under such subsection unless 
the Secretary of Defense, without delegation, certifies to the 
congressional defense committees that such project is essen-
tial for Army training. 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table
809 
† HR 2810 EAS 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Coun-
try 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Georgia ...........
Fort Gordon ...............................
Family Housing 
New Construction 
$6,100,000 
Germany .........
South Camp Vilseck ..................
Family Housing 
New Construction 
$22,445,000 
Korea ..............
Camp Humphreys .....................
Family Housing 
New Construction 
$34,402,000 
Massachusetts 
Natick .........................................
Family Housing 
Replacement Con-
struction 
$21,000,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $33,559,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2017, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of
810 
† HR 2810 EAS 
the Department of the Army as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2104. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 
113–66; 127 Stat. 986) for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, 
Washington, for construction of an airfield operations com-
plex, the Secretary of the Army may construct standby gen-
erator capacity of 1,000 kilowatts. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 
113–291; 128 Stat. 3670) for Fort Shafter, Hawaii, for con-
811 
† HR 2810 EAS 
struction of a command and control facility, the Secretary 
of the Army may construct 15 megawatts of redundant 
power 
generation 
for 
a 
total 
project 
amount 
of 
$370,000,000. 
SEC. 2106. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (127 Stat. 986), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2014 Project Authorizations 
Country 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Japan ........
Kyoga-Misaki 
Company Operations Com-
plex ......................................
$33,000,000 
SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b),
812 
† HR 2810 EAS 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 Stat. 3670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
California
Military 
Ocean Ter-
minal Con-
cord.
Access Control Point ..............
$9,900,000 
Hawaii ......
Fort Shafter ...
Command and Control Facil-
ity (SCIF) ...........................
$370,000,000 
Japan ........
Kadena Air 
Base ............
Missile Magazine ....................
$10,600,000 
Texas .........
Fort Hood ......
Simulation Center ..................
$46,000,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
813 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Yuma ...................................................................
$36,358,000 
California .................
Barstow ...............................................................
$36,539,000 
Camp Pendleton .................................................
$61,139,000 
Coronado .............................................................
$36,000,000 
Lemoore ...............................................................
$60,828,000 
Miramar ..............................................................
$87,174,000 
San Diego ...........................................................
$108,000,000 
Twentynine Palms .............................................
$55,099,000 
Florida ......................
Mayport ...............................................................
$194,818,000 
Georgia ......................
Albany .................................................................
$43,308,000 
Hawaii ......................
Kaneohe Bay .......................................................
$45,512,000 
....................................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ....................
$73,200,000 
Wahiawa .............................................................
$65,864,000 
Maine ........................
Kittery .................................................................
$61,692,000 
North Carolina .........
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$168,059,000 
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ..........
$15,671,000 
Virginia ....................
Dam Neck ............................................................
$29,262,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story ..
$2,596,000 
Portsmouth ..........................................................
$72,990,000 
Quantico ..............................................................
$23,738,000 
Yorktown .............................................................
$36,358,000 
Washington ...............
Indian Island .....................................................
$44,440,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Djibouti ........................
Camp Lemonier .................................................
$13,390,000 
Greece ...........................
Souda Bay .........................................................
$22,045,000 
Guam ............................
Joint Region Marianas .....................................
$284,679,000 
Japan ...........................
Iwakuni ..............................................................
$21,86,000
814 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installation or location, 
in the number of units, and in the amount set forth in the 
following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Bahrain Is-
land ............
Southwest Asia ..........................
Construction On- 
Base General and 
Flag Officers 
Quarters 
$2,138,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $4,418,000.
815 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $36,251,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2017, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
816 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (127 Stat. 989) and 
extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public 
Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2694), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2018, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2019, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2014 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Illinois ......................
Great Lakes .............
Unaccompanied 
Housing ...............
$35,851,000 
Nevada .......................
Fallon ......................
Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant ..........
$11,334,000 
Virginia .....................
Quantico ..................
Fuller Road Im-
provements ..........
$9,013,000 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b),
817 
† HR 2810 EAS 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (128 Stat. 3675), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
District of Columbia 
NSA Washington ....
Electronics Science 
and Technology 
Lab .......................
$37,882,000 
Maryland ..................
Indian Head ...........
Advanced Energetics 
Research Lab 
Complex Phase 2 
$15,346,000 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................................
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$168,900,000 
Arkansas .................................
Little Rock Air Force Base ..............
$20,000,000 
Colorado .................................
Buckley Air Force Base ....................
$38,000,000
818 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Air Force: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Fort Carson .......................................
$13,000,000 
U.S. Air Force Academy ..................
$30,000,000 
Florida ....................................
Eglin Air Force Base .......................
$90,700,000 
MacDill Air Force Base ...................
$8,100,000 
Tyndall Air Force Base ....................
$17,000,000 
Georgia ...................................
Robins Air Force Base .....................
$9,800,000 
Kansas ....................................
McConnell Air Force Base ...............
$17,500,000 
Maryland ................................
Joint Base Andrews ..........................
$271,500,000 
Nevada ....................................
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$61,000,000 
New Mexico ............................
Cannon Air Force Base ....................
$42,000,000 
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$4,250,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$9,300,000 
North Dakota ........................
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$27,000,000 
Ohio ........................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ....
$6,800,000 
Oklahoma ...............................
Altus Air Force Base ........................
$20,900,000 
Texas .......................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...................
$156,630,000 
Utah ........................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$28,000,000 
Wyoming ................................
F.E. Warren Air Force Base ...........
$62,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location outside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Australia ................................
Darwin ..............................................
$76,000,000 
Italy ........................................
Aviano Air Base ...............................
$27,325,000 
Qatar ......................................
Al Udeid ............................................
$15,000,000 
Turkey ....................................
Incirlik Air Base ..............................
$25,997,000 
United Kingdom ....................
RAF Fairford ....................................
$45,650,000 
RAF Lakenheath ...............................
$136,992,000 
Worldwide Unspecified ..........
Unspecified Worldwide Locations ...
$325,390,000
819 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construc-
tion or improvement of family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $4,445,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $80,617,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2017, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
820 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECTS. 
(a) HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE.—In the case of the 
authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2696) 
for Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, for construc-
tion of a gate complex at the installation, the Secretary of 
the Air Force may construct a visitor control center of 187 
square meters, a traffic check house of 294 square meters, 
and an emergency power generator system and transfer 
switch consistent with the Air Force’s construction guide-
lines. 
(b) MARIANA ISLANDS.—In the case of the authoriza-
tion contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 
(division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2697) for
821 
† HR 2810 EAS 
acquiring 142 hectares of land at an unspecified location 
in the Mariana Islands, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
purchase 142 hectares of land on Tinian in the Northern 
Mariana Islands for a cost of $21,900,000. 
(c) CHABELLEY AIRFIELD.—In the case of the author-
ization contained in the table in section 2902 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 
(division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2743) for 
Chabelley Airfield, Djibouti, for construction of a parking 
apron and taxiway at that location, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may construct 20,490 square meters of taxiway 
and apron, 8,230 square meters of paved shoulders, 10,650 
square meters of hangar pads, and 3,900 square meters of 
cargo apron. 
(d) SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE.—The table in section 
4601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 
Stat. 2877) is amended in the item relating to Scott Air 
Force Base, Illinois, by striking ‘‘Consolidated Corrosion 
Facility add/alter’’ in the project title column and inserting 
‘‘Consolidated Communication Facility add/alter’’. 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
822 
† HR 2810 EAS 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2301 of that Act (128 Stat. 3679), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State or 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Alaska ................
Clear Air Force Station
Emergency Power 
Plant Fuel Storage 
$11,500,000 
Oklahoma ...........
Tinker Air Force Base ....
KC–46 Two-Bay 
Maintenance Hang-
ar .............................
$63,000,000 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: