H. R. 3304—306 
(3) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps, 
if any, in the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Oppor-
tunity to adequately address sexual harassment cases; and 
(4) identify and assess the capability of the Office of Diver-
sity Management and Equal Opportunity to track incidences 
of sexual harassment cases. 
(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘sexual harassment’’ 
has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Direc-
tive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity 
Program. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 1741. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS 
AND NEW MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING 
ENTRY-LEVEL PROCESSING AND TRAINING. 
(a) DEFINING INAPPROPRIATE AND PROHIBITED RELATIONSHIPS, 
COMMUNICATION, CONDUCT, AND CONTACT BETWEEN CERTAIN MEM-
BERS.— 
(1) POLICY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of a military depart-
ment and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast 
Guard is operating shall maintain a policy that defines and 
prescribes, for the persons described in paragraph (2), what 
constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited relationship, 
communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an 
action is consensual, between a member of the Armed Forces 
described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or 
member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B). 
(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—The policy required by paragraph 
(1) shall apply to— 
(A) a member of the Armed Forces who exercises 
authority or control over, or supervises, a person described 
in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level processing or 
training of the person; and 
(B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a 
member of the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level proc-
essing or training. 
(3) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN MEMBERS REQUIRED.—The mem-
bers of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall 
include, at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached 
to duty— 
(A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons 
for enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, 
warrant officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces; 
(B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or 
(C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an 
Armed Force. 
(b) EFFECT OF VIOLATIONS.—A member of the Armed Forces 
who violates the policy required by subsection (a) shall be subject 
to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 
(c) PROCESSING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—(A) The Secretary of Defense and the 
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
operating shall require the processing for administrative sepa-
ration of any member of the Armed Forces described in sub-
section (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated violation
H. R. 3304—307 
by the member of the policy required by subsection (a), when 
the member is not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed 
from the Armed Forces for that violation. 
(B) The Secretary of a military department shall revise 
regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the jurisdic-
tion of that Secretary as necessary to ensure compliance with 
the requirement under subparagraph (A). 
(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—(A) In imposing the requirement 
under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any 
separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces 
is based on the full facts of the case and that due process 
procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or 
additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the Secre-
taries, pursuant to subsection (f). 
(B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not 
be interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary 
of a military department and the Secretary of the Department 
in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members 
of the Armed Forces for administrative separation— 
(i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation 
of the policy required by subsection (a); or 
(ii) under other provisions of law or regulation. 
(3) SUBSTANTIATED VIOLATION.—For purposes of paragraph 
(1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described 
in subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy required by subsection (a) 
shall be treated as substantiated if— 
(A) there has been a court-martial conviction for viola-
tion of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not 
include discharge or dismissal; or 
(B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 
815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uni-
form Code of Military Justice), has determined that a 
member has committed an offense in violation of the policy 
and imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the member. 
(d) REPORT ON NEED FOR UCMJ PUNITIVE ARTICLE.—Not later 
than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 
containing the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the 
need to amend chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice), to create an additional article 
under subchapter X of such chapter to address violations of the 
policy required by subsection (a). 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘entry-level processing or training’’, with 
respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means the period 
beginning on the date on which the member became a member 
of the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the 
member physically arrives at that member’s first duty assign-
ment following completion of initial entry training (or its 
equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military depart-
ment concerned or the Secretary of the Department in which 
the Coast Guard is operating. 
(2) The term ‘‘prospective member of the Armed Forces’’ 
means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a 
member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty 
described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member
H. R. 3304—308 
of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person eventu-
ally becomes a member of the Armed Forces. 
(f) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Sec-
retary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 
shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out 
this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the 
extent practicable, the regulations are uniform for each armed 
force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. 
SEC. 1742. COMMANDING OFFICER ACTION ON REPORTS ON SEXUAL 
OFFENSES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED.—A commanding officer who 
receives a report of a sex-related offense involving a member of 
the Armed Forces in the chain of command of such officer shall 
act upon the report in accordance with subsection (b) immediately 
after receipt of the report by the commanding officer. 
(b) ACTION REQUIRED.—The action required by this subsection 
with respect to a report described in subsection (a) is the referral 
of the report to the military criminal investigation organization 
with responsibility for investigating that offense of the military 
department concerned or such other investigation service of the 
military department concerned as the Secretary of the military 
department concerned may specify for purposes of this section. 
SEC. 1743. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN 
RESPONSE TO UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL 
ASSAULT IN WHICH THE VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE 
ARMED FORCES. 
(a) INCIDENT REPORTING POLICY REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary 
of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the 
Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy 
to require the submission by a designated person of a written 
incident report not later than eight days after an unrestricted 
report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of 
the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, this incident report 
shall be provided to the following: 
(1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred 
on or in the vicinity of a military installation. 
(2) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first 
general officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of 
the victim. 
(3) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first 
general officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of 
the alleged offender if the alleged offender is a member of 
the Armed Forces. 
(b) PURPOSE OF REPORT.—The purpose of the required incident 
report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or in 
progress to provide the necessary care and support to the victim 
of the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to the 
appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide initial notification 
of the serious incident when that notification has not already taken 
place. 
(c) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The report of an incident under sub-
section (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 
(A) Time/Date/Location of the alleged incident. 
(B) Type of offense alleged.
H. R. 3304—309 
(C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of 
the victim. 
(D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of 
the alleged offender, including information regarding 
whether the alleged offender has been temporarily trans-
ferred or removed from an assigned billet or ordered to 
pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted, if applicable. 
(E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the 
incident, including the following: 
(i) Referral of the victim to a Sexual Assault 
Response Coordinator for referral to services available 
to members of the Armed Forces who are victims of 
sexual assault, including the date of each such referral. 
(ii) Notification of incident to appropriate military 
criminal investigative organization, including the 
organization notified and date of such notification. 
(iii) Receipt and processing status of a request 
for expedited victim transfer, if applicable. 
(iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in 
connection with the incident. 
(2) MODIFICATION.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may modify 
the elements required in a report under this section 
regarding an incident involving a member of the Armed 
Forces (including the Coast Guard when it is operating 
as service in the Department of the Navy) if the Secretary 
determines that such modification will facilitate compliance 
with best practices for such reporting as identified by the 
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office of the 
Department of Defense. 
(B) COAST GUARD.—The Secretary of the Department 
in which the Coast Guard is operating may modify the 
elements required in a report under this section regarding 
an incident involving a member of the Coast Guard if 
the Secretary determines that such modification will facili-
tate compliance with best practices for such reporting as 
identified by the Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs. 
(d) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Sec-
retary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 
shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. 
SEC. 1744. REVIEW OF DECISIONS NOT TO REFER CHARGES OF CER-
TAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES FOR TRIAL BY COURT-MAR-
TIAL. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall require 
the Secretaries of the military departments to provide for 
review of decisions not to refer charges for trial by court- 
martial in cases where a sex-related offense has been alleged 
by a victim of the alleged offense. 
(2) SPECIFIC REVIEW REQUIREMENTS.—As part of a review 
conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of a military 
department shall require that— 
(A) consideration be given to the victim’s statement 
provided during the course of the criminal investigation
H. R. 3304—310 
regarding the alleged sex-related offense perpetrated 
against the victim; and 
(B) a determination be made whether the victim’s 
statement and views concerning disposition of the alleged 
sex-related offense were considered by the convening 
authority in making the referral decision. 
(b) SEX-RELATED OFFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘sex-related offense’’ means any of the following: 
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of 
section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of 
the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 
125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 
(1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 
80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
(c) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOL-
LOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION OF REFERRAL 
FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant 
to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of 
a sex-related offense be referred for trial by court-martial and 
the convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a court- 
martial, the convening authority shall forward the case file to 
the Secretary of the military department concerned for review as 
a superior authorized to exercise general court-martial convening 
authority. 
(d) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOL-
LOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION NOT TO REFER 
FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant 
to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of 
a sex-related offense should not be referred for trial by court- 
martial and the convening authority decides not to refer any charges 
to a court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case 
file for review to the next superior commander authorized to exer-
cise general court-martial convening authority. 
(e) ELEMENTS OF CASE FILE.—A case file forwarded to higher 
authority for review pursuant to subsection (c) or (d) shall include 
the following: 
(1) All charges and specifications preferred under section 
830 of title 10, United States Code (article 30 of the Uniform 
Code of Military Justice). 
(2) All reports of investigations of such charges, including 
the military criminal investigative organization investigation 
report and the report prepared under section 832 of title 10, 
United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military 
Justice), as amended by section 1702. 
(3) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related 
offense was notified of the opportunity to express views on 
the victim’s preferred disposition of the alleged offense for 
consideration by the convening authority. 
(4) All statements of the victim provided to the military 
criminal investigative organization and to the victim’s chain 
of command relating to the alleged sex-related offense and 
any statement provided by the victim to the convening authority
H. R. 3304—311 
expressing the victim’s view on the victim’s preferred disposi-
tion of the alleged offense. 
(5) The written advice of the staff judge advocate to the 
convening authority pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United 
States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
(6) A written statement explaining the reasons for the 
convening authority’s decision not to refer any charges for 
trial by court-martial. 
(7) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related 
offense was informed of the convening authority’s decision to 
forward the case as provided in subsection (c) or (d). 
(f) NOTICE ON RESULTS OR REVIEW.—The victim of the alleged 
sex-related offense shall be notified of the results of the review 
conducted under subsection (c) or (d) in the manner prescribed 
by the victims and witness assistance program of the Armed Force 
concerned. 
(g) VICTIM ALLEGATION OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSE.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military 
departments to develop a system to ensure that a victim of a 
possible sex-related offense under the Uniform Code of Military 
Justice is given the opportunity to state, either at the time of 
making an unrestricted report of the allegation or during the 
criminal investigation of the allegation, whether or not the victim 
believes that the offense alleged is a sex-related offense subject 
to the requirements of this section. 
SEC. 1745. INCLUSION AND COMMAND REVIEW OF INFORMATION ON 
SEX-RELATED 
OFFENSES 
IN 
PERSONNEL 
SERVICE 
RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) INFORMATION ON REPORTS ON SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—If a complaint of a sex-related offense 
is made against a member of the Armed Forces and the member 
is convicted by court-martial or receives non-judicial punish-
ment or punitive administrative action for such sex-related 
offense, a notation to that effect shall be placed in the personnel 
service record of the member, regardless of the member’s grade. 
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the inclusion of information 
in personnel service records under paragraph (1) is to alert 
commanders to the members of their command who have 
received courts-martial conviction, non-judicial punishment, or 
punitive administrative action for sex-related offenses in order 
to reduce the likelihood that repeat offenses will escape the 
notice of commanders. 
(b) LIMITATION ON PLACEMENT.—A notation under subsection 
(a) may not be placed in the restricted section of the personnel 
service record of a member. 
(c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) may be 
construed to prohibit or limit the capacity of a member of the 
Armed Forces to challenge or appeal the placement of a notation, 
or location of placement of a notation, in the member’s personnel 
service record in accordance with procedures otherwise applicable 
to such challenges or appeals. 
(d) COMMAND REVIEW OF HISTORY OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES 
OF MEMBERS UPON ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER TO NEW UNIT.— 
(1) REVIEW
REQUIRED.—Under uniform regulations pre-
scribed by the Secretary of Defense, the commanding officer 
of a facility, installation, or unit to which a member of the
H. R. 3304—312 
Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) is permanently 
assigned or transferred shall review the history of sex-related 
offenses as documented in the personnel service record of the 
member in order to familiarize such officer with such history 
of the member. 
(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—A member of the Armed Forces 
described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed Forces 
who, at the time of assignment or transfer as described in 
paragraph (1), has a history of one or more sex-related offenses 
as documented in the personnel service record of such member 
or such other records or files as the Secretary shall specify 
in the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1). 
SEC. 1746. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE 
ACADEMIES. 
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the United States 
Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the 
United States Air Force Academy include a section in the curricula 
of that military service academy that outlines honor, respect, and 
character development as such pertain to the issue of preventing 
sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula section shall 
include a brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the 
Armed Forces, a definition of sexual assault, information relating 
to reporting a sexual assault, victims’ rights, and dismissal and 
dishonorable discharge for offenders. Training in such section in 
the curricula shall be provided within 14 days after the initial 
arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at that military service 
academy and repeated annually thereafter. 
SEC. 1747. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION WHENEVER MEMBERS OF THE 
ARMED FORCES ARE COMPLETING STANDARD FORM 86 
OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POSI-
TIONS. 
(a) NOTIFICATION
OF POLICY.—Whenever a member of the 
Armed Forces is required to complete Standard Form 86 of the 
Questionnaire for National Security Positions in connection with 
an application, investigation, or reinvestigation for a security clear-
ance, the member shall be notified of the policy described in sub-
section (b) regarding question 21 of such form. 
(b) POLICY DESCRIBED.—The policy referred to in subsection 
(a) is the policy of instructing an individual to answer ‘‘no’’ to 
question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National 
Security Positions with respect to consultation with a health care 
professional if— 
(1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and 
(2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional 
or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual 
assault. 
Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 
SEC. 1751. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMMANDING OFFICER RESPONSI-
BILITY FOR COMMAND CLIMATE FREE OF RETALIATION. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) commanding officers in the Armed Forces are respon-
sible for establishing a command climate in which sexual 
assault allegations are properly managed and fairly evaluated
H. R. 3304—313 
and in which a victim can report criminal activity, including 
sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism 
and group pressure from other members of the command; 
(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain such 
a command climate is an appropriate basis for relief from 
their command positions; and 
(3) senior officers should evaluate subordinate commanding 
officers on their performance in establishing a command climate 
as described in paragraph (1) during the regular periodic coun-
seling and performance appraisal process prescribed by the 
Armed Force concerned for inclusion in the systems of records 
maintained and used for assignment and promotion selection 
boards. 
SEC. 1752. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DISPOSITION OF CHARGES 
INVOLVING CERTAIN SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OFFENSES 
UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE 
THROUGH COURTS-MARTIAL. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) any charge regarding an offense specified in subsection 
(b) should be disposed of by court-martial, rather than by 
non-judicial punishment or administrative action; and 
(2) in the case of any charge regarding an offense specified 
in subsection (b) that is disposed of by non-judicial punishment 
or administrative action, rather than by court-martial, the dis-
position authority should include in the case file a justification 
for the disposition of the charge by non-judicial punishment 
or administrative action, rather than by court-martial. 
(b) COVERED OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this subsection 
is any of the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United 
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice): 
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of 
section 920 of such title (article 120 of the Uniform Code 
of Military Justice). 
(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 
125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 
(1) or (2), as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 
80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
SEC. 1753. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DISCHARGE IN LIEU OF 
COURT-MARTIAL OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
WHO COMMIT SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the Armed Forces should be exceedingly sparing in 
discharging in lieu of court-martial members of the Armed 
Forces who have committed rape, sexual assault, forcible 
sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses, and should do 
so only when the facts of the case clearly warrant such dis-
charge; 
(2) whenever possible, the victims of offenses referred to 
in paragraph (1) shall be consulted prior to the determination 
regarding whether to discharge the members who committed 
such offenses; 
(3) convening authorities should consider the views of vic-
tims of offenses referred to in paragraph (1) when determining 
whether to discharge the members who committed such offenses 
in lieu of trying such members by court-martial; and
H. R. 3304—314 
(4) the discharge of any member who is discharged as 
described in paragraph (1) should be characterized as Other 
Than Honorable. 
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS 
REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.— 
Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 
in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land 
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions 
to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 
on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2016; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2017. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations 
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authoriza-
tions of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2016; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land 
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military 
Academy, New York. 
Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 
Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military
H. R. 3304—315 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................
Fort Wainwright .......................................
$103,000,000 
Colorado ..................
Fort Carson, Colorado ..............................
$242,200,000 
Florida .....................
Eglin Air Force Base ................................
$4,700,000 
Georgia ....................
Fort Gordon ..............................................
$61,000,000 
Hawaii .....................
Fort Shafter ..............................................
$70,000,000 
Kansas ....................
Fort Leavenworth .....................................
$17,000,000 
Kentucky .................
Fort Campbell, Kentucky ........................
$4,800,000 
Maryland ................
Aberdeen Proving Ground .......................
$21,000,000 
Fort Detrick ..............................................
$7,100,000 
Missouri ..................
Fort Leonard Wood ..................................
$90,700,000 
North Carolina .......
Fort Bragg ................................................
$5,900,000 
Texas .......................
Fort Bliss ..................................................
$46,800,000 
Virginia ...................
Joint Base Langley-Eustis .......................
$50,000,000 
Washington .............
Joint Base Lewis-McChord ......................
$144,000,000 
Yakima ......................................................
$9,100,00 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the 
military construction project for the installations or locations outside 
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Japan ........................
Kyoga-Misaki ............................................
$33,000,000 
Marshall Islands ......
Kwajalein Atoll .........................................
$63,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may construct or acquire family housing units (including land 
acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or loca-
tions, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Germany .............
South Camp 
Vilseck.
29 .......................
$16,600,000 
Wisconsin ...........
Fort McCoy .......
56 .......................
$23,000,000
H. R. 3304—316 
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 
and available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design activities with respect to the construction or improve-
ment of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,408,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Army 
as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
(2) $64,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 
239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks increment 2 at the 
United States Military Academy, New York). 
SEC. 2104. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF CADET BARRACKS AT 
UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, NEW YORK. 
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction 
of increment 2 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States Military 
Academy, New York, as authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 
of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the Secretary of 
the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that 
the Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of 
MacArthur Short Barracks at the United States Military Academy 
concurrent with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated 
Scott Barracks at the United States Military Academy. 
SEC. 2105. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—In connection with the authoriza-
tion contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B 
of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, 
New Jersey, for construction of a Research and Development 
Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a military 
construction project in the amount of $4,500,000 to complete work 
on the facility within the initial scope of the project. 
(b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 
shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of 
title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in 
subsection (a).
H. R. 3304—317 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) 
for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of APS Warehouses, 
the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 74,976 square 
meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square meters of access roads, 
a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 square meters of humidity- 
controlled warehouses. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 
4437) for Fort Lewis, Washington, for construction of a Regional 
Logistic Support Complex at the installation, the Secretary of the 
Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards of Organizational 
Vehicle Parking. 
SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2010 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B 
of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 
Act (126 Stat. 2628) and extended by section 2106 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 
of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Virginia .............
Fort Belvoir
Road and Access Control 
Point ................................
$9,500,000 
Washington ......
Fort Lewis ...
Fort Lewis-McChord AFB 
Joint Access ....................
$9,000,000 
Kuwait ..............
Camp 
Arifjian.
APS Warehouses ................
$82,000,000 
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 
of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
H. R. 3304—318 
Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
California .....
Presidio of Mon-
terey.
Advanced Individual Train-
ing Barracks .....................
$63,000,000 
Georgia .........
Fort Benning .........
Land Acquisition .................
$12,200,000 
New Mexico ..
White Sands Mis-
sile Range.
Barracks ...............................
$29,000,000 
Germany .......
Wiesbaden Air 
Base.
Access Control Point ...........
$5,100,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ................
Barstow .......................................................
$14,998,000 
Camp Pendleton .........................................
$13,124,000 
Coronado .....................................................
$8,910,000 
Point Mugu .................................................
$24,667,000 
Port Hueneme .............................................
$33,600,000 
San Diego ....................................................
$34,331,000 
Twentynine Palms .....................................
$33,437,000 
Florida .....................
Jacksonville ................................................
$20,752,000 
Key West .....................................................
$14,001,000 
Mayport .......................................................
$16,093,000 
Georgia ....................
Albany .........................................................
$16,610,000 
Savannah ....................................................
$61,717,000 
Guam .......................
Joint Region Marianas ...............................
$318,377,000 
Hawaii .....................
Kaneohe Bay ...............................................
$236,982,000 
Pearl City ....................................................
$30,100,000 
Pearl Harbor ...............................................
$57,998,000 
Illinois .....................
Great Lakes ................................................
$35,851,000 
Maine ......................
Bangor .........................................................
$13,800,000 
Kittery .........................................................
$11,522,000 
Maryland ................
Fort Meade .................................................
$83,988,000
H. R. 3304—319 
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Nevada ....................
Fallon ..........................................................
$11,334,000 
North Carolina .......
Camp Lejeune .............................................
$77,999,000 
New River ...................................................
$45,863,000 
Oklahoma ...............
Tinker Air Force Base ...............................
$14,144,000 
Rhode Island ...........
Newport .......................................................
$12,422,000 
South Carolina .......
Charleston ...................................................
$73,932,000 
Virginia ...................
Dam Neck ...................................................
$10,587,000 
Norfolk ........................................................
$3,380,000 
Quantico ......................................................
$38,374,000 
Yorktown .....................................................
$18,700,000 
Washington .............
Bremerton ...................................................
$18,189,000 
Whidbey Island ...........................................
$117,649,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Djibouti .....................
Camp Lemonier ..........................................
$29,000,000 
Japan .........................
Camp Butler ...............................................
$5,820,000 
Yokosuka ....................................................
$7,568,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family 
housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with respect 
to the construction or improvement of family housing units in 
an amount not to exceed $4,438,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2204 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $68,969,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, 
as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
H. R. 3304—320 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2201 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) and 
(3) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
(2) $357,877,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, 
Washington). 
(3) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, 
Guam). 
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 
4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction of Navy Central 
Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary of the Navy may 
construct additional Type C earth covered magazines (to provide 
a project total of eighteen), ten new modular storage magazines, 
an inert storage facility, a maintenance and ground support equip-
ment facility, concrete pads for portable ready service lockers, and 
associated supporting facilities using appropriations available for 
the project. 
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) 
for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of Explosives Handling 
Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy may construct new hardened 
facilities in lieu of hardening existing structures and a new facility 
to replace the existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection 
Unit and the Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facili-
ties using appropriations available for the project. 
SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 
of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
H. R. 3304—323 
(2) $69,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1670) for the United States Strategic Command 
Headquarters at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska). 
SEC. 2305. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction 
of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport 
storage facility in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, as authorized by section 2301(a), until the Secretary of 
the Air Force submits a report to the congressional defense commit-
tees that provides— 
(1) a summary of alternatives considered to support divert- 
field operations associated with Andersen Air Force Base; 
(2) a description of the overall construction requirements 
to support divert-field operations associated with Andersen Air 
Force Base and any other alternative considered; and 
(3) a comparison of the costs and benefits of leasing, as 
compared to purchasing real estate in fee, that supports the 
entirety of the divert-field requirement. 
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 
The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 
112–239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating to 
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a hangar by 
striking ‘‘$58,000,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$128,000,000’’. 
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2011 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that 
Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Bahrain ..........
Southwest Asia .....
North Apron Expansion ..
$45,000,000 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
H. R. 3304—324 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 
defense-wide. 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ...............................
Clear Air Force Base ...................
$17,204,000 
Fort Greely ...................................
$82,000,000 
California ..........................
Brawley .........................................
$23,095,000 
Defense 
Distribution 
Depot- 
Tracy ..........................................
$37,554,000 
Miramar ........................................
$6,000,000 
Colorado ............................
Fort Carson ..................................
$22,282,000 
Florida ...............................
Hurlburt Field ..............................
$7,900,000 
Jacksonville ..................................
$7,500,000 
Key West .......................................
$3,600,000 
Panama City .................................
$2,600,000 
Tyndall Air Force Base ................
$9,500,000 
Georgia ..............................
Fort Benning ................................
$43,335,000 
Fort Stewart .................................
$44,504,000 
Hunter Army Airfield ..................
$13,500,000 
Moody Air Force Base .................
$3,800,000 
Hawaii ...............................
Ford Island ...................................
$2,615,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 
$2,800,000 
Kentucky ...........................
Fort Campbell ..............................
$124,211,000 
Fort Knox ......................................
$303,023,000 
Maryland ...........................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ...........
$210,000,000 
Bethesda Naval Hospital .............
$66,800,000 
Massachusetts ..................
Hanscom Air Force Base .............
$36,213,000 
New Jersey ........................
Joint 
Base 
Mcguire-Dix- 
Lakehurst ..................................
$10,000,000 
New Mexico .......................
Holloman Air Force Base ............
$81,400,000 
North Carolina .................
Camp Lejeune ..............................
$43,377,000 
Fort Bragg ....................................
$172,065,000 
North Dakota ....................
Minot Air Force Base ...................
$6,400,000 
Oklahoma ..........................
Altus Air Force Base ...................
$2,100,000 
Tinker Air Force Base .................
$36,000,000 
Pennsylvania ....................
Defense Distribution Depot New 
Cumberland ..............................
$9,000,000 
South Carolina ..................
Beaufort ........................................
$41,324,000 
Tennessee ..........................
Arnold Air Force Base .................
$2,200,000 
Texas .................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...............
$12,600,000 
Virginia .............................
Dam Neck .....................................
$11,147,000
H. R. 3304—325 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Defense Distribution Depot Rich-
mond ..........................................
$87,000,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little 
Creek - Story .............................
$30,404,000 
Pentagon .......................................
$57,600,000 
Quantico ........................................
$40,586,000 
Washington .......................
Whidbey Island ............................
$10,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain Island .......
Southwest Asia .......................................
$45,400,000 
Belgium ..................
Brussels ...................................................
$67,613,000 
Germany .................
Kaiserlautern Air Base ..........................
$49,907,000 
Ramstein Air Base ..................................
$98,762,000 
Weisbaden ...............................................
$109,655,000 
Japan ......................
Atsugi ......................................................
$4,100,000 
Iwakuni ...................................................
$34,000,000 
Kadena Air Base .....................................
$38,792,000 
Kyoga-Misaki ..........................................
$15,000,000 
Torri Commo Station ..............................
$71,451,000 
Yokosuka .................................................
$10,600,000 
Korea ......................
Camp Walker ..........................................
$52,164,000 
United Kingdom ....
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ..................
$69,638,000 
Royal Air Force Mildenhall ....................
$84,629,000 
SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for energy conservation projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 
chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ..................
Anniston Army Depot .............
$2,700,000 
California ................
MCAS Miramar ......................
$17,968,000 
Parks DRTA ............................
$4,150,000 
Florida ....................
NAS Jacksonville ....................
$2,840,000
H. R. 3304—326 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States— 
Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Hawaii ....................
Camp Smith ............................
$7,966,000 
Hickam ....................................
$3,100,000 
Hickam ....................................
$3,000,000 
Idaho .......................
Mountain Home ......................
$2,630,000 
Kansas ....................
Tokepka Readiness Center ....
$2,050,000 
Massachusetts ........
Devens .....................................
$2,600,000 
New York ................
US Military Academy .............
$3,200,000 
South Carolina .......
Shaw ........................................
$2,500,000 
Texas .......................
NAS Corpus Christi ................
$2,340,000 
Sheppard .................................
$3,779,000 
Laughlin ..................................
$2,800,000 
Utah ........................
Dugway Proving Ground ........
$9,966,000 
Tooele Army Depot .................
$5,900,000 
Tooele Army Depot .................
$5,500,000 
Tooele Army Depot .................
$4,300,000 
Virginia ...................
NSA Hampton Roads .............
$4,060,000 
Pentagon ..................................
$2,120,000 
Various Locations ..
Various Locations ...................
$20,476,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for energy conservation projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 
chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ..........................
Ramstein .........................
$2,140,000 
Greenland .......................
Thule ...............................
$5,175,000 
Italy .................................
NAS Sigonella ................
$3,300,000 
Japan ...............................
CFA Sasebo .....................
$14,766,000 
Yokota .............................
$5,674,000 
Various Locations ...........
Various Locations ...........
$3,000,000 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of Defense 
(other than the military departments), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section
H. R. 3304—327 
2401 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) through 
(11) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
(2) $190,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Fort 
Knox, Kentucky). 
(3) $135,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) for a Public Health Command, Aberdeen 
Proving Ground, Maryland). 
(4) $45,600,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 
239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at 
Fort Meade, Maryland). 
(5) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 
239; 126 Stat. 2129) for the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense 
System Complex at Deveselu, Romania). 
(6) $175,639,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1672) for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland). 
(7) $11,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase 
III at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland). 
(8) $134,900,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase 
III at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas). 
(9) $715,863,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Bar-
racks, Germany). 
(10) $412,869,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas). 
(11) $41,913,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X 
of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111– 
32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah).
H. R. 3304—331 
Air National Guard—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Martin State Airport ..........................
$8,000,000 
Montana .........................
Great Falls International Airport .....
$22,000,000 
New York .......................
Fort Drum ...........................................
$4,700,000 
Ohio ................................
Springfield Beckley-Map ....................
$7,200,000 
Pennsylvania ..................
Fort Indiantown Gap ..........................
$7,700,000 
Rhode Island ..................
Quonset State Airport ........................
$6,000,000 
Tennessee .......................
Mcghee-Tyson Airport ........................
$18,000,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ......................
March Air Force Base ..........................
$19,900,000 
Florida ..........................
Homestead Air Reserve Base ..............
$9,800,000 
Oklahoma .....................
Tinker Air Force Base ..........................
$12,200,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
AND RESERVE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2013, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and 
engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard 
and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 
1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 
of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in 
section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON
COMMENCING
CERTAIN
PROJECTS.—No 
amounts may be obligated or expended for the projects associated 
with the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade, 
Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport, Mary-
land, as authorized by section 2604, until the date on which the 
Commander of the United States Cyber Command certifies to the 
congressional defense committees, and provides adequate sup-
porting documentation, that— 
(1) the scope of the military construction projects referred 
to in this subsection is consistent with the organizational man-
ning construct being developed by the United States Cyber 
Command; 
(2) units operating within such facilities will be trained 
to the readiness standards set by the Armed Force concerned 
and the United States Cyber Command for the missions to 
which these units will be assigned;
H. R. 3304—332 
(3) plans for proper mitigation measures will be imple-
mented to prevent inadvertent disclosure of classified informa-
tion; and 
(4) rules exist or will be developed to control access to 
classified systems operating pursuant to authorities under title 
10, United States Code, when operations are conducted pursu-
ant to authorities under title 32, United States Code. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 
2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a Joint Reserve 
Center at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may, instead 
of constructing a new facility at Camp Dodge, acquire up to approxi-
mately 20 acres to construct a Joint Reserve Center and associated 
supporting facilities in the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using 
amounts appropriated for the project pursuant to the authorization 
of appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136). 
SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 
2602, and 2604 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2015, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Puerto Rice ..............
Camp Santiago .......
Multi Purpose Ma-
chine Gun Range
$9,200,000 
Tennessee .................
Nashville Inter-
national Airport ..
Intelligence Group 
and Remotely Pi-
loted Aircraft Re-
mote Split Oper-
ations Group ........
$5,500,000 
Virginia ....................
Fort Story ................
Army Reserve Cen-
ter .........................
$11,000,000
H. R. 3304—333 
TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND 
CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 
(BRAC) round. 
Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability 
of military health care in National Capital Region. 
Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2013, for base realignment and clo-
sure activities, including real property acquisition and military 
construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of 
such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 
112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in 
section 4601. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 
2711. 
PROHIBITION 
ON 
CONDUCTING 
ADDITIONAL 
BASE 
REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND. 
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional 
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. 
SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIRE-
MENT REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH 
CARE IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 
Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking ‘‘on a quarterly 
basis’’. 
SEC. 2713. REPORT ON 2005 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT JOINT 
BASING INITIATIVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the 2005 base closure and 
realignment joint basing initiative. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following elements:
H. R. 3304—334 
(1) An analysis and explanation of the costs necessary 
to implement the joint basing initiative. 
(2) An analysis and explanation of any savings achieved 
to date and planned in future years, including quantifiable 
goals and a timeline for meeting such goals. 
(3) A description of implementation challenges and other 
lessons learned. 
(4) An assessment of any additional savings that could 
be achieved through more rigorous management and stream-
lined administration of joint bases. 
(5) Any other matters the Under Secretary considers appro-
priate. 
TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 
Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor mili-
tary construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects. 
Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with pri-
vate developers of housing. 
Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection. 
Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and services. 
Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing 
investment authority. 
Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization 
projects. 
Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and 
closure and realignment of United States military installations in for-
eign countries. 
Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use oper-
ation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas 
outside the United States. 
Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of re-
sponsibility. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 
Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations. 
Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses asso-
ciated with real property leases and easements. 
Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of 
utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances. 
Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property. 
Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin˜on Canyon Ma-
neuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. 
Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 
Sec. 2821.
Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 
covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspec-
tors General for Guam Realignment. 
Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. 
Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 
Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. 
Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, Cali-
fornia. 
Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. 
Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsyl-
vania. 
Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. 
Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 
Mountains, Utah. 
Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Con-
necticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.