I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2765 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit recognition and enforce-
ment of foreign defamation judgments and certain foreign judgments 
against the providers of interactive computer services. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 9, 2009 
Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. NADLER of New York, 
Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. COBLE, 
and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit recogni-
tion and enforcement of foreign defamation judgments 
and certain foreign judgments against the providers of 
interactive computer services. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DEFAMATION 
JUDGMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Part VI of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
04:40 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2765.IH
H2765
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
‘‘CHAPTER 181—FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘4101. Definitions. 
‘‘4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments. 
‘‘4103. Attorneys’ fees. 
‘‘§ 4101. Definitions 
‘‘In this chapter: 
‘‘(1) DOMESTIC
COURT.—The term ‘domestic 
court’ means a Federal court or a court of any 
State. 
‘‘(2) FOREIGN
COURT.—The term ‘foreign 
court’ means a court, administrative body, or other 
tribunal of a foreign country. 
‘‘(3) FOREIGN JUDGMENT.—The term ‘foreign 
judgment’ means a final judgment rendered by a 
foreign court. 
‘‘(4) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means each of 
the several States, the District of Columbia, and any 
commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United 
States. 
‘‘§ 4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments 
‘‘(a) FIRST AMENDMENT CONSIDERATIONS.—Not-
withstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, 
a domestic court shall not recognize or enforce a foreign 
judgment for defamation whenever the party opposing rec-
ognition or enforcement of the judgment claims that the 
judgment is inconsistent with the first amendment to the 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
04:40 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2765.IH
H2765
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
with such section 230. The burden of establishing that the 
foreign judgment is consistent with such section 230 shall 
lie with the party seeking recognition or enforcement of 
the judgment. 
‘‘(d) APPEARANCES NOT A BAR.—An appearance by 
a party in a foreign court rendering a foreign judgment 
to which this section applies for the purpose of contesting 
the foreign court’s exercise of jurisdiction in the case, mov-
ing the foreign court to abstain from exercising jurisdic-
tion in the case, defending on the merits any claims 
brought before the foreign court, or for any other purpose, 
shall not deprive such party of the right to oppose the 
recognition or enforcement of the judgment under this sec-
tion. 
‘‘§ 4103. Attorneys’ fees 
‘‘In any action brought in a domestic court to enforce 
a foreign judgment for defamation, the court may allow 
the party opposing recognition or enforcement of the judg-
ment a reasonable attorney’s fee if such party prevails in 
the action on a ground specified in subsection (a), (b), 
or (c).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters 
for part VI of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘181. Foreign judgments ................................................................. 4101.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
04:40 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2765.IH
H2765
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS