datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
HR 2667 PP
ignated by Congress as an emergency requirement pursu-
ant to section 251(b)(2)(D)(i) of the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Ω38æENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Ω39æABATEMENT, CONTROL, AND COMPLIANCE
For an additional amount for ‘‘Abatement, Control,
and Compliance’’ for the Midwest floods of 1993,
$24,250,000, to remain available until September 30,
1994: Provided, That the Administrator may make these
funds available notwithstanding any applicable formula
allocating funds to States for programs authorized: Pro-
vided further, That the entire amount is designated by
Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section
251(b)(2)(d)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.
Ω40æPROGRAM AND RESEARCH OPERATIONS
For an additional amount for ‘‘Program and Re-
search Operations,’’ for the Midwest floods of 1993,
$1,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 1994:
Provided, That the entire amount is designated by Con-
gress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section
251(b)(2)(d)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.
HR 2667 PP
Ω41æLEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TRUST FUND
For an additional amount for ‘‘Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Trust Fund’’ to make cooperative agreements
under section 9003(h)(7) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended, for the Midwest floods of 1993, $8,000,000, to
remain available until September 30, 1994: Provided,
That the entire amount is designated by Congress as an
emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(d)(i)
of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985, as amended.
Ω42æOIL SPILL RESPONSE
For an additional amount for ‘‘Oil Spill Response,’’
for the Midwest floods of 1993, $700,000, to remain avail-
able until September 30, 1994: Provided, That the entire
amount is designated by Congress as an emergency re-
quirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(d)(i) of the Bal-
anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985,
as amended.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
DISASTER RELIEF
For an additional amount for ‘‘Disaster relief’’,
Ω43æ$815,000,000 $1,735,000,000, Ω44æand in addition,
$265,000,000, which shall be available only to the extent
an official budget request for a specific dollar amount, that
includes designation of the entire amount of the request as
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1631
AN ACT
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase
the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases
under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Concilia-
tion Branch of the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia
Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC-
TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION
BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 1631
One Hundred Third Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four
An Act
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum amount
in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims
and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia Justice
Reform Act of 1994’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY PER-
MITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDICTION OF SMALL
CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is amended by
striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall apply to cases filed with the Superior Court of the District
of Columbia on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1631
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of
the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of
the District of Columbia.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the District of Columbia
A BILL
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase
the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases
under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Concilia-
tion Branch of the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia
Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC-
TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION
BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Æ
Calendar No. 429
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1631
[Report No. 103–261]
AN ACT
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to
increase the maximum amount in controversy
permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the
Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the
Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
MAY 18 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994
Reported with an amendment
IIA
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1631
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JULY 20 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs
AN ACT
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase
the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases
under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Concilia-
tion Branch of the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia
Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC-
TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION
BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
Union Calendar No. 98
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1631
[Report No. 103–174]
A BILL
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to
increase the maximum amount in controversy
permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the
Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Su-
perior Court of the District of Columbia.
JULY 13, 1993
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB
Union Calendar No. 98
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1631
[Report No. 103–174]
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of
the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of
the District of Columbia.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the District of Columbia
JULY 13, 1993
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union
and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase
the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases
under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Concilia-
tion Branch of the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia
Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC-
TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION
BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
II
Calendar No. 429
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1631
[Report No. 103–261]
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JULY 20 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs
MAY 18 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994
Reported by Mr. GLENN, with an amendment
[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]
AN ACT
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase
the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases
under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Concilia-
tion Branch of the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia
Justice Reform Act of 1993 1994’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC-
TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION
BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, District of Co-
lumbia Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$5,000’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
109 
‘‘(C) If an overpayment is identified during 
an audit, the Secretary shall allow a credit in 
the amount of the overpayment.’’; 
(2) in subsection (a)(4)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘six’’ and inserting ‘‘four’’; 
and 
(B) by striking ‘‘shall’’ the second place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘may’’; and 
(3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after 
the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (C), by 
striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) 
and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(E) is made within the adjustment period 
for that obligation.’’. 
SEC. 308. CONFORMING AMENDMENT. 
Section 114 of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Man-
agement Act of 1982 is repealed. 
SEC. 309. OBLIGATION PERIOD. 
Section 115(c) of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1724(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) ADJUSTMENTS.—In the case of an adjust-
ment under section 111A(a) in which a recoupment 
by the lessee results in an underpayment of an obli-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
20:49 May 23, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1870.IH
H1870
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
vessel that, on or after the date that is 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of the Iran Threat 
Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 
2012, is used, with actual knowledge in the case 
of a person that is a controlling beneficial owner 
or knowingly in the case of a person that other-
wise owns, operates, or controls the vessel, in a 
manner that conceals the Iranian origin of crude 
oil or refined petroleum products transported on 
the vessel, including by— 
‘‘(i) permitting the operator of the ves-
sel to suspend the operation of the vessel’s 
satellite tracking device; or 
‘‘(ii) obscuring or concealing the own-
ership, operation, or control of the vessel 
by— 
‘‘(I) the Government of Iran; 
‘‘(II) the National Iranian Tank-
er Company or the Islamic Republic of 
Iran Shipping Lines; or 
‘‘(III) any other entity deter-
mined by the President to be owned or 
controlled by the Government of Iran 
or an entity specified in subclause (II).
† HR 1905 EAS 
prohibitions on financial transactions and the exportation 
and importation of property, subject to such regulations as 
the President may prescribe. 
SEC. 703. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO 
THE 
TRANSFER 
OF 
GOODS 
OR 
TECH-
NOLOGIES TO SYRIA THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE 
USED TO COMMIT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall impose sanc-
tions described in section 702(c) with respect to— 
(1) each person on the list required by subsection 
(b); and 
(2) any person that— 
(A) is a successor entity to a person on the 
list; 
(B) owns or controls a person on the list, if 
the person that owns or controls the person on 
the list had actual knowledge or should have 
known that the person on the list engaged in the 
activity described in subsection (b)(2) for which 
the person was included in the list; or 
(C) is owned or controlled by, or under 
common ownership or control with, the person 
on the list, if the person owned or controlled by, 
or under common ownership or control with (as 
the case may be), the person on the list know-
(1) the effective date of the regulation, policy 
statement, guidance, requirement, or program; or 
(2) the denial or issuance of the permit. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis-
trator’’ means the Administrator of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency. 
(2) DE MINIMIS NEGATIVE IMPACT.—The term 
‘‘de minimis negative impact’’ means the following: 
(A) With respect to employment levels, a 
loss of more than 100 jobs. Any offsetting job 
gains that result from the hypothetical creation 
of new jobs through new technologies or govern-
ment employment may not be used in the job 
loss calculation. 
(B) With respect to economic activity, a 
decrease in economic activity of more than 
$1,000,000 over any calendar year. Any offset-
ting economic activity that results from the hy-
pothetical creation of new economic activity 
through new technologies or government em-
ployment may not be used in the economic ac-
tivity calculation. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:45 May 21, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1872.IH
H1872
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(1) The term ‘‘Basin Conservation Program’’
means the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation
Program established under section 3(a).
(2) The term ‘‘Conservation Advisory Group’’
means the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advi-
sory Group established under section 3(c).
(3) 
The 
term 
‘‘Irrigation 
Demonstration
Project’’ means the Yakima Indian Reservation Irri-
gation Demonstration Project authorized in section
4(b).
(4) The term ‘‘on-district storage’’ means small
water storage facilities located within the boundaries
of an irrigation entity, including reregulating res-
ervoirs, holding ponds, or other new storage methods
which allow for efficient water use.
(5) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(6) 
The 
term 
‘‘Toppenish 
Enhancement
Project’’ means the Toppenish Creek corridor en-
hancement project authorized by section 4(c).
(7) The term ‘‘Yakima Project Superintendent’’
means the individual designated by the Regional Di-
rector, Pacific Northwest Region, Bureau of Rec-
lamation, to be responsible for the operation and
‘‘(iii) such other elements as the State 
determines necessary to support electric 
vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehi-
cles. 
Each plan under this paragraph shall provide 
for the deployment of the charging infrastruc-
ture or other infrastructure necessary to ade-
quately support the use of plug-in hybrid elec-
tric vehicles and electric vehicles. 
‘‘(B) 
SUPPORT
REQUIREMENTS.—Each 
State regulatory authority (with respect to each 
electric utility for which it has ratemaking au-
thority) and each nonregulated electric utility 
shall— 
‘‘(i) require that charging infrastruc-
ture deployed is interoperable with prod-
ucts of all auto manufacturers to the ex-
tent possible; and 
‘‘(ii) consider adopting minimum re-
quirements for deployment of electrical 
charging infrastructure and other appro-
priate requirements necessary to support 
the use of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles 
and electric vehicles. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
20:50 May 23, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1875.IH
H1875
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1871 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension 
of the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member 
of the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 
injuries. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 12, 2011 
Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent 
the extension of the tax collection period merely because 
the taxpayer is a member of the Armed Forces who 
is hospitalized as a result of combat zone injuries. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wounded Warrior Tax 
Equity Act of 2011’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
17:51 May 20, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1871.IH
H1871
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
hereby established as a court of record in the District of
Columbia.
‘‘(b) The court shall have a seal.
‘‘§ 11–602. Composition.
The court shall consist of a chief justice and 6 associ-
ate justices.
‘‘§ 11–603. Justices; service; compensation.
‘‘(a) The chief justice and the justices of the court
shall serve in accordance with chapter 15 of this title.
‘‘(b) Justices of the court shall be compensated at
90 percent of the rate prescribed by law for justices of
the United States Supreme Court. The chief justice shall
receive $3,000 per year in addition to the salary of other
justices of the court.
‘‘§ 11–604. Oath of justices.
‘‘Each justice, when appointed, shall take the oath
prescribed for judges of courts of the United States.
‘‘§ 11–605. Term; hearings; quorum.
‘‘(a) The court shall sit in one term each year for
such period as it may determine.
‘‘(b) The court shall sit in banc to hear and determine
cases and controversies, except that the court may sit in
divisions of 3 justices to hear and determine cases and
controversies certified for review under section 11–621 if
the court determines that subsection (b)(2) of such section
H. R. 1632—8
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘his appoint-
ment’’ and inserting ‘‘appointment’’;
(B) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by striking ‘‘is which’’ and inserting ‘‘in which’’,
and
(ii) by striking ‘‘his predecessor’’ and inserting
‘‘such person’s predecessor’’; and
(C) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘or whom’’ and
inserting ‘‘of whom’’.
(4) Section 432(b) is amended by striking ‘‘his judicial
duties’’ and inserting ‘‘judicial duties’’.
(5) Section 432(c) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘his convic-
tion’’ and inserting ‘‘conviction’’, and
(ii) in the matter following subparagraph (B), by
striking ‘‘his salary’’ and all that follows and inserting
‘‘any salary and all other rights and privileges of
office.’’;
(B) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by striking ‘‘as he may be entitled’’ and inserting
‘‘as the judge may be entitled’’,
(ii) by striking ‘‘his judicial salary’’ and inserting
‘‘judicial salary’’, and
(iii) by striking ‘‘his office’’ and inserting ‘‘office’’;
and
(C) in paragraph (3)—
(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by
striking ‘‘his judicial duties’’ and inserting ‘‘the judge’s
judicial duties’’, and
(ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘his suspen-
sion’’ and inserting ‘‘such suspension’’.
(6) Section 433(a) is amended by striking ‘‘to him’’.
(7) Section 433(b) is amended—
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking
‘‘he—’’ and inserting ‘‘the person—’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘his nomination’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘the nomination’’; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘as long as he serves’’
and inserting ‘‘while serving’’.
(8) Section 433(c) is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘his term’’ the first place it appears
and inserting ‘‘the judge’s term’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘his term’’ the second place it appears
and inserting ‘‘the term’’;
(C) by striking ‘‘his present’’ and inserting ‘‘the
present’’;
(D) by striking ‘‘his fitness’’ and inserting ‘‘the can-
didate’s fitness’’; and
(E) by striking ‘‘he shall nominate’’ and inserting ‘‘the
President shall nominate’’.
(9) Section 434(b) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1) in the matter preceding sub-
paragraph (A), by striking ‘‘he—’’ and inserting ‘‘the per-
son—’’;
(B) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘his appointment’’
and inserting ‘‘appointment’’; and
SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF EXTENSION OF TAX COLLECTION 
PERIOD FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES WHO ARE HOSPITALIZED AS A RE-
SULT OF COMBAT ZONE INJURIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7508(e) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) COLLECTION PERIOD AFTER ASSESSMENT 
NOT
EXTENDED
AS
A
RESULT
OF
HOSPITALIZA-
TION.—With respect to any period of continuous 
qualified hospitalization described in subsection (a) 
and the next 180 days thereafter, subsection (a) 
shall not apply in the application of section 6502.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxes assessed before, on, or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
17:51 May 20, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1871.IH
H1871
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(A) in paragraph (1) in the fourth sen-
tence, by striking ‘‘to him’’ and inserting ‘‘to
the President’’; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘his rec-
ommendation’’ and inserting ‘‘the recommenda-
tion’’.
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
HR 1632 RFS——2