datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(3) DISPUTE
SETTLEMENT
PANEL; PANEL.—
The terms ‘‘dispute settlement panel’’ and ‘‘panel’’
mean a panel established pursuant to Article 6 of
the Dispute Settlement Understanding.
(4) DISPUTE
SETTLEMENT
BODY.—The term
‘‘Dispute Settlement Body’’ means the Dispute Set-
tlement Body administering the rules and proce-
dures set forth in the Dispute Settlement Under-
standing.
(5) DISPUTE SETTLEMENT UNDERSTANDING.—
The term ‘‘Dispute Settlement Understanding’’
means the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes referred to in
section 101(d)(16) of the Uruguay Round Agree-
ments Act.
(6) URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT.—The term
‘‘Uruguay Round Agreement’’ means any of the
agreements described in section 101(d) of the Uru-
guay Round Agreements Act.
(7) WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION; WTO.—The
terms ‘‘World Trade Organization’’ and ‘‘WTO’’
mean the organization established pursuant to the
WTO Agreement.
(8) WTO 
AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘WTO
Agreement’’ means the Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization entered into on April 15,
1994.
Æ
HR 1434 IH——2
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1435
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the use of certain
agricultural byproducts in wine production.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit
the use of certain agricultural byproducts in wine production.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. USE OF OTHER AGRICULTURAL BYPRODUCTS
IN WINE PRODUCTION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 5373 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to wine spir-
its) is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as
paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively,
HR 1435 IH
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the follow-
ing new paragraph:
‘‘(2) as determined by the Secretary, other agri-
cultural products or their residues,’’, and
(3) by adding at the end thereof the following:
‘‘Wine spirits derived from other than standard
wines may not be used to fortify a natural wine.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment
of this Act.
Æ
SEC. 4. FUNDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ESTUARY CON-
SERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLANS.
Title VI of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end
the following:
‘‘SEC. 608. CAPITALIZATION GRANTS TO STATES FOR IM-
PLEMENTING ESTUARY CONSERVATION AND
MANAGEMENT PLANS.
‘‘(a) SET-ASIDE
FOR IMPLEMENTING APPROVED
PLANS.—
‘‘(1) SET-ASIDE.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Of amounts appro-
priated under the authority of section 607 for
each fiscal year, the applicable percentage
under subparagraph (B) shall be used by the
Administrator to make capitalization grants
under this title to qualified States.
‘‘(B) PERCENTAGE.—For purposes of sub-
section (A), the applicable percentage is—
‘‘(i) 2.5 percent for fiscal year 1996;
‘‘(ii) 5 percent for fiscal year 1997;
‘‘(iii) 7.5 percent for fiscal year 1998;
‘‘(iv) 10 percent for fiscal year 1999;
‘‘(v) 12.5 percent for fiscal year 2000;
‘‘(vi) 15 percent for fiscal year 2001;
and
HR 1437 IH
ment project under this title as necessary to operate reli-
able, high-speed rail passenger service, to enhance capac-
ity for intercity and commuter passenger service, and as
otherwise may be necessary to ensure continued reliable
high-speed service. Amtrak shall also acquire train equip-
ment to be used on the Northeast Corridor, mitigate envi-
ronmental impacts related to the Northeast Corridor im-
provement project, and provide adequate parking at, and
improve Northeast Corridor rail stations.’’;
(2) by revising subsection (b) to read as follows:
‘‘(b) RHODE ISLAND THIRD TRACK.—(1) There are
authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to make
grants to the State of Rhode Island, $10,000,000 for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and $10,000,000
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, to be used
to design and construct a third track on the Northeast
Corridor between Davisville and Central Falls, Rhode
Island.
‘‘(2) The third track shall be designed and con-
structed with sufficient clearance to accommodate double
stack freight cars.
‘‘(3) The funds provided by the Secretary to the State
of Rhode Island to design and construct the third track
shall be matched by the State of Rhode Island or its des-
ignee on a dollar for dollar basis. Notwithstanding other
HR 1437 IH
provisions of law, the State of Rhode Island is authorized
to use other Federal transportation funds available to the
State as the required matching funds.’’;
(3) by revising subsection (c) to read as follows:
‘‘(c) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS.—Amounts appro-
priated under this section remain available until ex-
pended.’’; and
(4) by striking subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g).
SEC. 16. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Except as otherwise provided, this Act is effective on
the date of enactment.
Æ
HR 1437 IH——2
U.S.C. 499; commonly known as the Clarke-
McNary Act).
‘‘(C) The sixth paragraph under the head-
ing ‘‘FOREST SERVICE’’ in the Act of May
23, 1908 (35 Stat. 260; 16 U.S.C. 500).
‘‘(D) Section 13 of the Act of March 1,
1911 (36 Stat. 963; 16 U.S.C. 500; commonly
known as the Weeks Act).
‘‘(E) The sixth paragraph under the head-
ing ‘‘ADMINISTRATIVE
PROVISIONS, 
FOREST
SERVICE’’ in title II of the Department of the
Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act, 1993 (Public Law 102–381; 106 Stat.
1400; 16 U.S.C. 500 note).
‘‘(F) The fourteenth paragraph under the
heading ‘‘FOREST SERVICE’’ of the Act of
March 4, 1913 (37 Stat. 843; 16 U.S.C. 501).
‘‘(5) EXCESS AMOUNTS.—Amounts in the Fund
determined by the Secretary to be in excess of the
cost of accomplishing the activities specified in para-
graph (2) shall be transferred to miscellaneous re-
ceipts in the Treasury of the United States.
Amounts transferred shall be considered as moneys
received from the national forests within the mean-
ing of the sixth paragraph under the heading ‘‘FOR-
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 143
To require preemployment drug testing with respect to applicants for Federal
employment.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 4, 1995
Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
A BILL
To require preemployment drug testing with respect to
applicants for Federal employment.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employment
Applicant Drug Testing Act’’.
SEC. 2. PREEMPLOYMENT DRUG TESTING.
(a) IN GENERAL.—All applicants for employment
with the Federal Government shall be subject to
preemployment drug testing in accordance with require-
ments which shall be prescribed by—
(1) the President, with respect to applicants for
employment within the executive branch;
(2) the Administrative Office of the United
States Courts, with respect to applicants for employ-
ment within the judicial branch; and
(3)(A) each House of Congress, with respect to
applicants for employment within such House; or
(B) the appointing authority, with respect to
applicants for employment in any other office or
agency within the legislative branch.
(b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term
‘‘drug’’ means a controlled substance, as defined by sec-
tion 102(6) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.
802(6)).
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Any rules or regulations necessary to carry out this
Act shall be issued in time so that they may be imple-
mented beginning not later than the 90th day after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
498 
•HR 2642 EAH1S 
‘‘(i) each priority area specified in 
subsection (b)(2) of the Competitive, Spe-
cial, and Facilities Research Grant Act (7 
U.S.C. 450i(b)(2)); 
‘‘(ii) each research and extension 
project carried out under section 1621(a) of 
the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and 
Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5811(a)); 
‘‘(iii) each grant to be awarded under 
section 1672B(a) of the Food, Agriculture, 
Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 
U.S.C. 5925b(a)); 
‘‘(iv) each grant awarded under section 
412(d) of the Agricultural Research, Exten-
sion, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 
U.S.C. 7632(d)); and 
‘‘(v) 
each 
grant 
awarded 
under 
7405(c)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural 
Investment 
Act 
of 
2002 
(7 
U.S.C. 
3319f(c)(1)); or 
‘‘(D) any other information the Secretary 
determines will increase congressional oversight 
with respect to covered programs. 
‘‘(3) PROHIBITION.—Unless the President sub-
mits the information described in paragraph (2)(C)
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 1777 
AN ACT 
To amend the Act of August 25, 1958, commonly known 
as the ‘‘Former Presidents Act of 1958’’, with respect 
to the monetary allowance payable to a former President, 
and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1443
To amend chapter 44 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for
arbitration in all United States district courts, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. MOORHEAD
(for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. COBLE, Mr.
GOODLATTE, Mr. BONO, Mr. GALLEGLY, and Mr. CANADY of Florida) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
A BILL
To amend chapter 44 of title 28, United States Code, to
provide for arbitration in all United States district
courts, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Arbitration Au-
thorization Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Section 905 of the Judicial Improvements and Access
to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 651 note) is amended in the
first sentence by striking ‘‘for each of the fiscal years 1994
through 1997’’.
SEC. 3. ARBITRATION TO BE ORDERED IN ALL DISTRICT
COURTS.
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF
ARBITRATION.—Section
651(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Each United States district court
shall authorize by local rule the use of arbitration in civil
actions, including adversary proceedings in bankruptcy, in
accordance with this chapter.’’.
(b) ACTIONS REFERRED TO ARBITRATION.—Section
652(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A) by striking ‘‘and section 901(c)’’ and all
that follows through ‘‘651’’ and inserting ‘‘a
district court’’; and
(B) in subparagraph (B) by striking
‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’; and
(2) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’
and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’.
(c) 
CERTIFICATION
OF
ARBITRATORS.—Section
656(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by
striking ‘‘listed in section 658’’.
(d) REMOVAL OF LIMITATION.—Section 658 of title
28, United States Code, and the item relating to such sec-
tion in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter
44 of title 28, United States Code, are repealed.
SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.
Section 901 of the Judicial Improvements and Access
to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 652 note) is amended by strik-
ing subsection (c).
SEC. 5. AMENDMENT TO FEDERAL JUDGESHIP ACT OF 1990.
Section 203(c) of the Federal Judgeship Act of 1990
(28 U.S.C. 133 note) is amended in the last sentence by
striking ‘‘effective date of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘date
on which the first appointment of a judge to that office
is confirmed by the Senate’’.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1445
To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to restore the
stenographic preference for depositions.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. MOORHEAD (for himself, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. COBLE, and Mr. CANADY
of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
to restore the stenographic preference for depositions.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That paragraphs (2) and (3) of Rule 30(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure are amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) Unless the court upon motion orders, or
the parties stipulate in writing, the deposition shall
be recorded by stenographic means. The party tak-
ing the deposition shall bear the cost of the tran-
scription. Any party may arrange for a transcription
137 
•HR 2642 EAH1S 
in a general partnership or as a partici-
pant in a joint venture. 
‘‘(B) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘legal entity’ 
does not include a general partnership or joint 
venture.’’; 
(2) by striking subsections (b) through (d) and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS FOR COVERED COM-
MODITIES AND PEANUTS.—The total amount of payments 
received, directly or indirectly, by a person or legal entity 
for any crop year for 1 or more covered commodities and 
peanuts under title I of the Federal Agriculture Reform and 
Risk Management Act of 2013 may not exceed $125,000, 
of which— 
‘‘(1) not more than $75,000 may consist of mar-
keting loan gains and loan deficiency payments 
under subtitle B of title I of the Federal Agriculture 
Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013; and 
‘‘(2) not more than $50,000 may consist of any 
other payments made for covered commodities and 
peanuts under title I of the Federal Agriculture Re-
form and Risk Management Act of 2013. 
‘‘(c) SPOUSAL EQUITY.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection 
(b), except as provided in paragraph (2), if a person
to be made from the recording of a deposition taken
by nonstenographic means.
‘‘(3) With prior notice to the deponent and
other parties, any party may use another method to
record the deponent’s testimony in addition to the
method used pursuant to paragraph (2). The addi-
tional record or transcript shall be made at the par-
ty’s expense unless the court otherwise orders.’’.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 807
To protect the Constitution of the United States from unauthorized encroach-
ment into legislative powers by the executive branch, and to protect
the American taxpayer from unauthorized encroachment into his wallet
by an unconstitutional action of the President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 2, 1995
Mr. STOCKMAN (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr.
BURTON, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. COOLEY, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr.
GANSKE, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.
METCALF, Mr. SALMON, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mrs.
SEASTRAND, Mr. SOUDER, and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services
and, in addition, to the Committee on International Relations, for a pe-
riod to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for con-
sideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the commit-
tee concerned
A BILL
To protect the Constitution of the United States from unau-
thorized encroachment into legislative powers by the ex-
ecutive branch, and to protect the American taxpayer
from unauthorized encroachment into his wallet by an
unconstitutional action of the President.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
IB
Union Calendar No. 120
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1445
[Report No. 104–228]
To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to restore the
stenographic preference for depositions.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. MOORHEAD (for himself, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. COBLE, and Mr. CANADY
of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary
AUGUST 2, 1995
Additional sponsors: Mr. BONO, Mr. BARR, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, and
Mr. SENSENBRENNER
AUGUST 2, 1995
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union
and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
to restore the stenographic preference for depositions.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That paragraphs (2) and (3) of Rule 30(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure are amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) Unless the court upon motion orders, or
the parties stipulate in writing, the deposition shall
be recorded by stenographic means. The party tak-
ing the deposition shall bear the cost of the tran-
scription. Any party may arrange for a transcription
to be made from the recording of a deposition taken
by nonstenographic means.
‘‘(3) With prior notice to the deponent and
other parties, any party may use another method to
record the deponent’s testimony in addition to the
method used pursuant to paragraph (2). The addi-
tional record or transcript shall be made at the par-
ty’s expense unless the court otherwise orders.’’.
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1446
To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to promote equity
and fairness in lawsuits brought against State and local law enforcement
officers.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. MOORHEAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to
promote equity and fairness in lawsuits brought against
State and local law enforcement officers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi-
cers Civil Liability Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. LAWSUITS BROUGHT AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Title XXIV of the Revised Stat-
utes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1981 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘SEC. 1992. (a) In any civil action under Federal law
against a law enforcement officer for conduct in the course
of official duty, punitive damages shall not be awarded
against that officer except to punish or deter conduct—
‘‘(1) specifically intended unlawfully to cause
serious personal injury; or
‘‘(2) engaged in with flagrant indifference to
the rights of the injured party and with an aware-
ness that such conduct is likely to result in serious
personal injury and is unlawful;
and shall not, if awarded, exceed $10,000. Such punitive
damages may not be awarded except on clear and convinc-
ing evidence of conduct described in paragraph (1) or (2).
The indemnification of any such officer, by any person or
entity, for any punitive damages paid by that officer sub-
ject to this section shall not in itself create any liability
of that person or entity in any civil action.
‘‘(b) In any civil action arising out of the conduct
of a law enforcement officer in the course of official duty,
in which—
‘‘(1) there is a monetary recovery; and
‘‘(2) attorney’s fees may be awarded under sec-
tion 722 (42 U.S.C. 1988);
the amount of attorney’s fees so awarded shall not exceed
one third of such monetary recovery.
‘‘(c) As used in this section—
‘‘(1) 
the 
term 
‘law 
enforcement 
officer’
means—
‘‘(A) any peace officer;
‘‘(B) a prison or jail guard; or
‘‘(C) any corrections officer;
of a State or of any subdivision of a State;
‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ includes the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and each other territory and
possession of the United States; and
‘‘(3) the term ‘official duty’ includes conduct by
an off-duty law enforcement officer in circumstances
indicating a law enforcement response.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of title XXIV of the Revised Statutes
of the United States is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘1992. Lawsuits brought against State and local law enforcement officers.’’.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1447
To revise the boundaries of the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage
Corridor in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 6, 1995
Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode
Island, and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To revise the boundaries of the Blackstone River Valley
National Heritage Corridor in Massachusetts and Rhode
Island, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blackstone River
Valley National Heritage Corridor Amendments Act of
1995’’.
SEC. 2. BOUNDARY CHANGES.
Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish the
Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor in
Massachusetts and Rhode Island’’, approved November
10, 1986 (Public Law 99–647; 16 U.S.C. 461 note), is
amended by striking the first sentence and inserting the
following new sentence: ‘‘The boundaries shall include the
lands and water generally depicted on the map entitled
Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor
Boundary Map, numbered BRV–80–80,011, and dated
May 2, 1993.’’.
SEC. 3. TERMS.
Section 3(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish
the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor
in Massachusetts and Rhode Island’’, approved November
10, 1986 (Public Law 99–647; 16 U.S.C. 461 note), is
amended by inserting immediately before the period at the
end the following: ‘‘, but may continue to serve after the
expiration of this term until a successor has been ap-
pointed’’.
SEC. 4. REVISION OF PLAN.
Section 6 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish the
Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor in
Massachusetts and Rhode Island’’, approved November
10, 1986 (Public Law 99–647; 16 U.S.C. 461 note), is
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
sas Historical Society, and other interested par-
ties.
(3) CONTENT OF PLAN.—The general manage-
ment plan shall provide for the following:
(A) 
Maintaining 
and 
enhancing 
the
tallgrass prairie ecosystem within the bound-
aries of the Preserve.
(B) Public access and enjoyment of the
property that is consistent with the conserva-
tion and proper management of the historical,
cultural, and natural resources of the ranch,
lands of adjoining landowners, and surrounding
communities.
(C) Interpretive and educational programs
covering the natural history of the prairie, the
cultural history of Native Americans, and the
legacy of ranching in the Flint Hills region.
(D) Provisions requiring the application of
applicable State law concerning the mainte-
nance of adequate fences within the boundaries
of the Preserve. In any case in which an activ-
ity of the National Park Service requires fences
that exceed the legal fence standard otherwise
applicable to the Preserve, the National Park
Service shall pay the additional cost of con-
structing and maintaining the fences to meet
the applicable requirements for that activity.
(E) Provisions requiring the Secretary to
comply with applicable State noxious weed, pes-
ticide, and animal health laws.
(F) Provisions requiring compliance with
applicable Federal and State water laws and
waste disposal laws (including regulations) and
any other applicable law.
(G) Provisions requiring the Secretary to
honor each valid existing oil and gas lease for
lands within the boundaries of the Preserve (as
described in section 4(b)) that is in effect on
the date of enactment of this Act.
(H) Provisions requiring the Secretary to
offer to enter into an agreement with each indi-
vidual who, as of the date of enactment of this
Act, holds rights for cattle grazing within the
boundaries of the Preserve (as described in sec-
tion 4(b)).
SEC. 6. LIMITED AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized and
directed to acquire, by donation or purchase with donated
or appropriated funds, at fair market value—