HRES 198 IH
office if the Federal Bureau of Investigation did not
do so.
(6) Any document showing what was said dur-
ing the discussion referred to in paragraph (5), in-
cluding the response of the official of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation to the suggestion that the
Internal Revenue Service be used to investigate the
White House travel office.
(7) Any document concerning the decision to re-
tain the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick to
audit the White House travel office, including the
timing of that decision, and any relationship between
the audit and the national performance review by
the Vice President.
(8) Any document concerning the identity of
any official of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
who decided to investigate the White House travel
office, and the identity of any other official of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation who was consulted
about that decision.
(9) Any document concerning what action was
originally taken against the seven employees of the
White House travel office, how this action was modi-
fied subsequently, and what is the current status of
the employees.
HRES 198 IH
(10) Any document concerning who made the
decision to take the original action against the seven
employees referred to in paragraph (9), who made
the decision to modify the original action, who was
consulted with respect to each of these decisions,
and upon what information these decisions were
based.
(11) Any document concerning the identity of
any person who authorized or directed White House
officials to summon John Collingwood, Inspector in
Charge of the Office of Public and Congressional Af-
fairs of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, to the
White House to discuss the investigation of the
White House travel office by the Bureau.
(12) Any document concerning the identity of
any person who authorized or directed John
Collingwood, Inspector in Charge of the Office of
Public and Congressional Affairs of the Federal Bu-
reau of Investigation, to meet with White House of-
ficials to discuss the investigation of the White
House travel office by the Bureau.
(13) Any document concerning whether William
Sessions, Director of the Federal Bureau of Inves-
tigation, was aware that the meeting referred to in
paragraph (12) had been requested.
HRES 198 IH
(14) Any document describing what was said at
the meeting referred to in paragraph (12), including
how it was decided that a press statement on the
stationery of William Sessions, Director of the Fed-
eral Bureau of Investigation, would be issued to con-
firm that a Bureau criminal investigation of the
White House travel office was underway.
(15) Any document concerning the identity of
any person who participated in the drafting of the
press statement referred to in paragraph (14), the
extent to which the press statement was revised, and
the identity of any person who was consulted about
the contents of the press statement.
(16) Any document concerning the identity of
any person who authorized or directed John
Collingwood, Inspector in Charge of the Office of
Public and Congressional Affairs of the Federal Bu-
reau of Investigation, to issue the press statement
described in paragraph (14).
(17) Any document concerning whether the
Federal Bureau of Investigation would ordinarily
issue a press statement to confirm that a criminal
investigation is underway when the investigation is
at the preliminary stage that the White House travel
HRES 198 IH
office investigation had reached when the statement
referred to in paragraph (14) was issued.
(18) Any document concerning whether the
statement referred to in paragraph (14) violated the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), or Federal regulation
thereunder, and whether Privacy Act’s civil and
criminal penalties are applicable in this case.
(19) Any document concerning to what extent
White House officials involved with the investigation
of the White House travel office were aware of the
interest of workers on President William Clinton’s
presidential campaign such as Catherine Cornelius
in assuming control of the White House travel office,
and how they became aware of such interest.
(20) Any document concerning to what extent
White House officials involved with the investigation
of the White House travel office were aware of the
interest of contributors to President William Clin-
ton’s 
presidential 
campaign 
such 
as 
Harry
Thomason (and his business partner Darnell
Martens) in obtaining contracts with the White
House travel office, and how they became aware of
such interests.
(21) Any document concerning whether White
House officials involved with the investigation of the
HRES 198 IH
White House travel office informed the Federal Bu-
reau of Investigation of the interest of workers in
President William Clinton’s presidential campaign
such as Catherine Cornelius and contributors to his
presidential campaign such as Harry Thomason
(and his business partner Darnell Martens) in ob-
taining control of the White House travel office or
contracts with it at the time that these White House
officials requested the Federal Bureau of Investiga-
tion to investigate the White House travel office, and
if not, why this information was withheld.
(22) Any document concerning what financial
arrangements or understandings existed in connec-
tion with employment of Penny Sample in the White
House travel office, and how she came to receive a
commission for her work in the White House travel
office.
(23) Any document concerning whether Harry
Thomason was a special government employee within
the meaning of section 202(a) of title 18, United
States Code, by virtue of the fact that he had a
White House residence pass, daily access to the
White House, and an office in the Old Executive Of-
fice Building, and if he was, whether his efforts to
obtain contracts with the White House travel office
HRES 198 IH
or other communications whatsoever and all drafts there-
of.
Æ