datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4279
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the disposition 
of unused health benefits in cafeteria plans and flexible spending arrange-
ments. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004
Mr. MCCRERY (for himself and Mr. ROYCE) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
for the disposition of unused health benefits in cafeteria 
plans and flexible spending arrangements.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DISPOSITION OF UNUSED HEALTH BENEFITS 
IN CAFETERIA PLANS AND FLEXIBLE SPEND-
ING ARRANGEMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 125 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 (relating to cafeteria plans) is amended 
by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i)
and (j), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (g) 
the following: 
‘‘(h) CONTRIBUTIONS OF CERTAIN UNUSED HEALTH 
BENEFITS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this title, 
a plan or other arrangement shall not fail to be 
treated as a cafeteria plan solely because qualified 
benefits under such plan include a health flexible 
spending arrangement under which not more than 
$500 of unused health benefits may be—
‘‘(A) carried forward to the succeeding 
plan year of such health flexible spending ar-
rangement, or 
‘‘(B) to the extent permitted by section 
106(d), contributed by the employer to a health 
savings account (as defined in section 223(d)) 
maintained for the benefit of the employee. 
‘‘(2) HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGE-
MENT.—For purposes of this subsection, the term 
‘health flexible spending arrangement’ means a flexi-
ble spending arrangement (as defined in section 
106(c)) that is a qualified benefit and only permits 
reimbursement for expenses for medical care (as de-
fined in section 213(d)(1), without regard to sub-
paragraphs (C) and (D) thereof).
‘‘(3) UNUSED
HEALTH
BENEFITS.—For pur-
poses of this subsection, with respect to an em-
ployee, the term ‘unused health benefits’ means the 
excess of—
‘‘(A) the maximum amount of reimburse-
ment allowable to the employee for a plan year 
under a health flexible spending arrangement, 
over 
‘‘(B) the actual amount of reimbursement 
for such year under such arrangement.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2003.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 427
To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the sale in certain States of gasoline 
from other regions, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 28, 2003
Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the sale in certain 
States of gasoline from other regions, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fuel Price Stability 
Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. SALE OF GASOLINE FROM OTHER REGIONS. 
Section 211(k) of the Clean Air Act is amended by 
adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof: 
‘‘(11) WAIVER IN CASE OF SIGNIFICANT PRICE 
INCREASES.—The Governor of Illinois, Indiana, or
Wisconsin may issue an order allowing any person to 
sell or dispense, for a specified period, in any cov-
ered area in any such State conventional gasoline or 
reformulated gasoline that is not certified by the Ad-
ministrator for that covered area if—
‘‘(A) such gasoline is certified by the Ad-
ministrator for sale in any other region of the 
country; and 
‘‘(B) the Governor finds that reduced 
availability of reformulated gasoline certified by 
the Administrator for the covered area con-
cerned has resulted in, or is likely to result in, 
a significant price increase for reformulated 
gasoline in that covered area.’’.
Æ
with the active participation of agents and citizens 
of the United States and further acknowledges that 
the Native Hawaiian people never directly relin-
quished to the United States their claims to their in-
herent sovereignty as a people over their national 
lands, either through the Kingdom of Hawaii or 
through a plebiscite or referendum; 
(14) the Apology Resolution expresses the com-
mitment of Congress and the President—
(A) to acknowledge the ramifications of the 
overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii; 
(B) to support reconciliation efforts be-
tween the United States and Native Hawaiians; 
and 
(C) to consult with Native Hawaiians on 
the reconciliation process as called for in the 
Apology Resolution; 
(15) despite the overthrow of the government of 
the Kingdom of Hawaii, Native Hawaiians have con-
tinued to maintain their separate identity as a dis-
tinct native community through cultural, social, and 
political institutions, and to give expression to their 
rights as native people to self-determination, self-
governance, and economic self-sufficiency;
reference to an arrangement referred to in this sub-
section.
Æ
(ii) occupied and exercised sovereignty 
in the Hawaiian archipelago, including the 
area that now constitutes the State of Ha-
waii; or 
(B) an individual who is one of the indige-
nous, native people of Hawaii and who was eli-
gible in 1921 for the programs authorized by 
the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (42 Stat. 
108, chapter 42) or a direct lineal descendant 
of that individual. 
(9) NATIVE HAWAIIAN GOVERNING ENTITY.— 
The term ‘‘Native Hawaiian Governing Entity’’ 
means the governing entity organized by the Native 
Hawaiian people pursuant to this Act. 
(10) OFFICE.—The term ‘‘Office’’ means the 
United States Office for Native Hawaiian Relations 
established under section 5(a). 
(11) 
SECRETARY.—The 
term 
‘‘Secretary’’ 
means the Secretary of the Department of the Inte-
rior. 
SEC. 4. UNITED STATES POLICY AND PURPOSE. 
(a) POLICY.—The United States reaffirms that— 
(1) Native Hawaiians are a unique and distinct, 
indigenous, native people with whom the United 
States has a special political and legal relationship;
(b) DIRECT PAYMENT.—Section 401(a) (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(a)) is further amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2); and 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (2). 
(c) 
MAXIMUM
GRANT
EXTENSION.—Paragraph 
(2)(A) of section 401(b) (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(2)(A)) is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(2)(A) The amount of the Federal Pell Grant for 
a student eligible under this part shall be $5,800 for aca-
demic years 2005–2006 through 2010–2011, less an 
amount equal to the amount determined to be the expected 
family contribution with respect to that student for that 
year.’’. 
(d) TUITION SENSITIVITY.—Section 401(b) is further 
amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (3); and 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through 
(8) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively. 
(e) MULTIPLE GRANTS.—Paragraph (5) of section 
401(b) (as redesignated by subsection (d)(2)) is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘(5) YEAR-ROUND PELL GRANTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, 
for students enrolled full time in a bacca-
195
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘fiscal years 
1998 through 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 
2004 through 2009’’. 
PART B—ADDITIONAL EDUCATION LAWS 
SEC. 1021. AMENDMENT TO HIGHER EDUCATION AMEND-
MENTS OF 1998. 
(a) REPEALS OF EXPIRED AND EXECUTED PROVI-
SIONS.—The following provisions of the Higher Education 
Amendments of 1998 are repealed: 
(1) STUDY OF MARKET MECHANISMS IN FED-
ERAL STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS.—Section 801 (20 
U.S.C. 1018 note). 
(2) STUDY OF FEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATE FI-
NANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FOR DETERMINING LENDER 
YIELDS.—Section 802. 
(3) STUDENT RELATED DEBT STUDY.—Section 
803 (20 U.S.C. 1015 note) 
(4) STUDY OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTICIPA-
TION
IN
ATHLETIC
PROGRAMS.—Section 805 (20 
U.S.C. 1001 note). 
(5) 
COMMUNITY
SCHOLARSHIP
MOBILIZA-
TION.—Part C (20 U.S.C. 1070 note). 
(6) 
INCARCERATED
YOUTH.—Part 
D 
(20 
U.S.C. 1151).
100 
(1) Such comments and observations relating to 
the matters addressed in the Postal Service’s report as 
the Commission considers appropriate. 
(2) An estimate of the cost attributable to the ob-
ligation to provide universal service under prior and 
current law, respectively. 
(3) An estimate of the likely cost of fulfilling the 
obligation to provide universal service under— 
(A) the assumptions or respective sets of as-
sumptions of the Postal Service described in sub-
section (a)(4); and 
(B) such other assumptions or sets of as-
sumptions as the Commission considers plau-
sible. 
(4) Such additional topics and recommendations 
as the Commission considers appropriate. 
(c) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the reports required 
by this section, the Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory 
Commission— 
(1) shall consult with each other, other Federal 
agencies, users of the mails, enterprises in the private 
sector engaged in the delivery of mail, and the general 
public; and 
(2) shall address in their respective reports any 
written comments received under this section.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4288
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exemption 
amounts for individuals under the alternative minimum tax. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004
Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
the exemption amounts for individuals under the alter-
native minimum tax.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN EXEMPTION AMOUNTS FOR INDI-
VIDUALS 
UNDER 
ALTERNATIVE 
MINIMUM 
TAX. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 55(d) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$45,000 ($58,000 in the case 
of taxable years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$100,000’’, and
131 
mental liability as of the close of such fiscal year, with each 
such determination to be made by June 15th of the following 
fiscal year. 
‘‘(ii) If a supplemental liability is determined under 
this subparagraph for a fiscal year, the Office shall establish 
an amortization schedule, including a series of equal an-
nual installments commencing on September 30 of the fol-
lowing fiscal year, which provides for the liquidation of 
such liability by September 30, 2043. 
‘‘(iii)(I) If a surplus of $500,000,000 or more is deter-
mined under this subparagraph for a fiscal year, the 
amount of the surplus shall be transferred to the Postal 
Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund by June 30th of the 
following fiscal year. 
‘‘(II) If a surplus of less than $500,000,000 is deter-
mined under this subparagraph for a fiscal year, the sur-
plus shall remain in the Fund, subject to transfer in a sub-
sequent fiscal year under subclause (I) or subparagraph 
(C)(iii). 
‘‘(C)(i) Not later than June 15, 2040, the Office shall 
determine the Postal surplus or supplemental liability as 
of September 30, 2039. 
‘‘(ii) If a supplemental liability is determined under 
this subparagraph for fiscal year 2039, the Office shall es-
tablish an amortization schedule, including a series of equal
(2) by striking ‘‘$33,750 ($40,250 in the case 
of taxable years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘75 percent of the dollar amount applica-
ble under subparagraph (A)’’. 
(b) INCREASE IN THRESHOLD FOR PHASING OUT 
EXEMPTION AMOUNT.—Subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) 
of section 55(d)(3) of such Code are amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(A) $250,000 in the case of a taxpayer 
described in paragraph (1)(A) or (2), and 
‘‘(B) 50 percent of the dollar amount ap-
plicable under subparagraph (A) in the case of 
a taxpayer described in subparagraph (B), (C), 
or (D) of paragraph (1).’’
(c) INCREASE IN RATE OF PHASE-OUT OF EXEMP-
TION AMOUNT.—Paragraph (3) of section 55(d) of such 
Code is amended by striking ‘‘25 percent’’ and inserting 
‘‘50 percent’’. 
(d) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF EXEMPTION AND 
THRESHOLD AMOUNTS.—Subsection (d) of section 55 of 
such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF EXEMPTION 
AND THRESHOLD AMOUNTS FOR INDIVIDUALS.—In 
the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar
year after 2005, each of the dollar amounts set forth 
in paragraphs (1)(A) and (3)(A) shall be increased 
by an amount equal to—
‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter-
mined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar 
year by substituting ‘calendar year 2004’ for 
‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 
thereof. 
If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence 
is not a multiple of $1,000, such amount shall be rounded 
to the nearest multiple of $1,000.’’. 
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(f) COORDINATION WITH SUNSET OF BENEFITS.—
Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec-
onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the amendments 
made by this section.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4289
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the low-income housing 
credit without regard to whether moderate rehabilitation assistance is 
provided with respect to a building. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004
Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 
low-income housing credit without regard to whether 
moderate rehabilitation assistance is provided with re-
spect to a building.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LOW-INCOME HOUSING CREDIT 
DISQUALIFICATION FOR BUILDINGS RECEIV-
ING 
MODERATE 
REHABILITATION 
ASSIST-
ANCE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 42(c) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified low-
income building) is amended by striking the last sentence. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 428
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for 
increasing research activities permanent. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 28, 2003
Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 
the credit for increasing research activities permanent.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increasing re-
search activities) is amended by striking subsection (h). 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 
section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub-
paragraph (D).
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 
June 30, 2004.
Æ
items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 
by inserting after section 139 the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 139A. INTEREST ON LOANS SECURED BY AGRICUL-
TURAL REAL PROPERTY. 
‘‘(a) EXCLUSION.—Gross income shall not include in-
terest received by a qualified lender on any qualified real 
estate loan. 
‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—
‘‘(1) QUALIFIED LENDER.—The term ‘qualified 
lender’ means any bank or savings association the 
deposits of which are insured under the Federal De-
posit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.). 
‘‘(2) QUALIFIED
REAL
ESTATE
LOAN.—The 
term ‘qualified real estate loan’ means any loan se-
cured by agricultural real estate or by a leasehold 
mortgage (with a status as a lien) on agricultural 
real estate. For purposes of the preceding sentence, 
the determination of whether property securing such 
loan is agricultural real estate shall be made as of 
the time the interest income on such loan is accrued. 
‘‘(3) AGRICULTURAL REAL ESTATE.—The term 
‘agricultural real estate’ means—
‘‘(A) real property used for the production 
of 1 or more agricultural products, and 
‘‘(B) any single family residence—
(2) updated once a year and include any new 
data-mining technologies. 
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4291 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a boundary study to 
evaluate the significance of the Colonel James Barrett Farm in the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the suitability and feasibility of 
its inclusion in the National Park System as part of the Minute Man 
National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004 
Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a boundary 
study to evaluate the significance of the Colonel James 
Barrett Farm in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 
and the suitability and feasibility of its inclusion in the 
National Park System as part of the Minute Man Na-
tional Historical Park, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT STUDY. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this Act: 
(1) BARRETT’S
FARM.—The term ‘‘Barrett’s 
Farm’’ means the Colonel James Barrett Farm list-
ed on the National Register of Historic Places, in-
cluding the house and buildings on the approxi-
mately 6 acres of land in Concord, Massachusetts. 
(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of the Interior. 
(b) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date 
funds are made available, the Secretary shall conduct a 
boundary study to evaluate the significance of Barrett’s 
Farm in Concord, Massachusetts, as well as the suitability 
and feasibility of its inclusion in the National Park System 
as part of Minute Man National Historical Park. 
(c) CONTENT OF STUDY.—The study shall include an 
analysis of the following: 
(1) The significance of Barrett’s Farm in rela-
tion to the Revolutionary War. 
(2) Opportunities for public enjoyment of the 
site as part of the Minute Man National Historical 
Park. 
(3) Any operational and management issues 
that need to be considered if Barrett’s Farm were 
added to the Minute Man National Historical Park. 
(4) A determination of the feasibility of admin-
istering Barrett’s Farm considering its size, configu-
ration, ownership, costs, and other factors, as part 
of Minute Man National Historical Park.
(5) An evaluation of the adequacy of other al-
ternatives for management and resource protection 
of Barrett’s Farm. 
(d) SUBMISSION OF REPORT.—Upon completion of 
the study, the Secretary shall submit a report on the find-
ings of the study to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources 
of the House of Representatives. 
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary to carry out this Act. 
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4293 
To modify the boundary of the Mary McLeod Bethune Council House 
National Historic Site in Washington, District of Columbia. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004 
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To modify the boundary of the Mary McLeod Bethune Coun-
cil House National Historic Site in Washington, District 
of Columbia. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This section may be cited as the ‘‘Mary McLeod Be-
thune Council House National Historic Site Boundary Ad-
justment Act’’. 
SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 
Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize 
the National Park Service to acquire and manage the 
Mary McLeod Bethune Council House National Historic
Site, and for other purposes’’, approved December 11, 
1991 (105 Stat. 1652), is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary’’; 
and 
(2) by adding after subsection (a) (as so des-
ignated by paragraph 1 of this section) the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(b) The Secretary may acquire, with the consent of 
the owner thereof, by donation or by purchase with do-
nated or appropriated funds, the abutting property located 
at 1320 Vermont Avenue Northwest, Washington, District 
of Columbia, and generally depicted on the map entitled 
‘Mary McLead Bethune Council Proposed Boundary Ad-
justment’, numbered 021/80,006, and dated February 
2004, to be used for visitor orientation, administrative 
purposes, archival storage, facilities for researchers, and 
accessibility for handicapped persons.’’. 
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4294 
To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse located at 333 Constitution Ave. Northwest 
in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Judge William B. Bryant 
Annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 5, 2004 
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse located at 333 
Constitution Ave. Northwest in Washington, District of 
Columbia, as the ‘‘Judge William B. Bryant Annex to 
the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JUDGE WILLIAM B. BRYANT 
ANNEX TO THE E. BARRETT PRETTYMAN FED-
ERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURT-
HOUSE. 
The annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse located at 333 
Constitution Ave. Northwest in Washington, District of 
Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge 
William B. Bryant Annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman 
Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the annex 
to the Federal building and United States Courthouse re-
ferred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ‘‘Judge William B. Bryant Annex to the E. Barrett 
Prettyman Federal Building and United States Court-
house’’. 
Æ
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4294 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 22, 2004 
Received 
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
AN ACT 
To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse located at 333 
Constitution Avenue Northwest in the District of Colum-
bia as the ‘William B. Bryant Annex’ ’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 4294 RFS 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 
The annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse located at 333 
Constitution Avenue Northwest in the District of Colum-
bia shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William B. Bry-
ant Annex’’. 
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the annex 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ‘‘William B. Bryant Annex’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.