II
Calendar No. 316
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2724
[Report No. 106–183]
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1999
Received, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works
OCTOBER 13, 1999
Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, with an amendment
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
AN ACT
To make technical corrections to the Water Resources
Development Act of 1999.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
(a) JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Section 219 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is amended—
(1) by striking subsection (e)(1) and inserting:
‘‘(1) $20,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(5);’’; and
(2) by striking subsection (c)(5) and inserting:
‘‘(5) JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Provi-
sion of an alternative water supply and a project for
the elimination or control of combined sewer over-
flows for Jackson County, Mississippi.’’.
(b) ELIZABETH AND NORTH HUDSON, NEW JER-
SEY.—Subsection (f) of section 219 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 is amended—
(1)
in
paragraph
(33)
by
striking
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’;
(2)
in
paragraph
(34)
by
striking
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’; and
(3) in paragraph (34) by striking ‘‘city of
North Hudson’’ and inserting ‘‘for the North Hud-
son Sewerage Authority’’.
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
(a) JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Section 219 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (5)
and inserting the following:
‘‘(5) JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Provision
of an alternative water supply and a project for the
elimination or control of combined sewer overflows for
Jackson County, Mississippi.’’; and
(2) 
in 
subsection 
(e)(1), 
by 
striking
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.
(b) 
MANCHESTER, 
NEW
HAMPSHIRE.—Section
219(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is amended by striking
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’.
(c) ATLANTA, GEORGIA.—Section 219(f)(1) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000 for’’.
(d) PATERSON, PASSAIC COUNTY, AND PASSAIC VAL-
LEY, NEW JERSEY.—Section 219(f)(2) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
335) is amended by striking ‘‘$20,000,000 for’’.
(e) ELIZABETH AND NORTH HUDSON, NEW JERSEY.—
Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended—
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(33), 
by 
striking
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’; and
(2) in paragraph (34)—
(A) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$20,000,000’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘in the city of North Hud-
son’’ and inserting ‘‘for the North Hudson Sew-
erage Authority’’.
SEC. 2. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MAN-
AGEMENT PROGRAM.
Section 1103(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(5)) (as amended by section
509(c)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999
(113 Stat. 340)) is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph
(1)(A)(i)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’.
SEC. 3. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.
Section 346 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1999 (113 Stat. 309) is amended by striking ‘‘economi-
cally acceptable’’ and inserting ‘‘environmentally accept-
able’’.
SEC. 4. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.
Section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1999 (113 Stat. 313) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘Each’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to
section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), each’’;
(2) by striking paragraph (1); and
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (6)
as paragraphs (1) through (5), respectively.
SEC. 5. SHORE PROTECTION.
Section 103(d)(2)(A) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)(2)(A)) (as amended
by section 215(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 292)) is amended by striking ‘‘or
for which a feasibility study is completed after that date,’’
and inserting ‘‘except for a project for which a District En-
gineer’s Report is completed by that date,’’.
SEC. 6. DAM SAFETY.
Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 338) is amended by inserting ‘‘No.
5’’ after ‘‘Dam’’.