datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3758
To require persons who undertake federally funded research and development
of drugs to enter into reasonable pricing agreements with the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 29, 1998
Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island,
Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. STARK, Mr. BERRY, Ms. WOOL-
SEY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. BOU-
CHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Commerce
A BILL
To require persons who undertake federally funded research
and development of drugs to enter into reasonable pric-
ing agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Research
and Development and Taxpayer Protection Act’’.
SEC. 2. REASONABLE PRICE AGREEMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—If any Federal agency or any non-
profit entity undertakes federally funded health care re-
search and development and is to convey or provide a pat-
ent or other exclusive right to use such research and devel-
opment for a drug or other health care technology, such
agency or entity shall not make such conveyance or pro-
vide such patent or other right until the person who will
receive such patent or other right first agrees to a reason-
able pricing agreement with the Secretary of Health and
Human Services or the Secretary makes a determination
that the public interest is served by a waiver of the reason-
able pricing agreement provided in accordance with sub-
section (c).
(b) CONSIDERATION OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING.—In
cases where the Federal Government conveys or licenses
exclusive rights to federally funded research under sub-
section (a), consideration shall be given to mechanisms for
determining reasonable prices which are based upon a
competitive bidding process. When appropriate, the mech-
anisms should be considered where—
(1) qualified bidders compete on the basis of
the lowest prices that will be charged to consumers;
(2) qualified bidders compete on the basis of
the least sales revenues before prices are adjusted in
accordance with a cost based reasonable pricing for-
mula;
(3) qualified bidders compete on the basis of
the least period of time before prices are adjusted in
accordance with a cost based reasonable pricing for-
mula;
(4) qualified bidders compete on the basis of
the shortest period of exclusivity; or
(5) qualified bidders compete under other com-
petitive bidding systems.
Such competitive bidding process may incorporate require-
ments for minimum levels of expenditures on research,
marketing, maximum price, or other factors.
(c) WAIVER.—No waiver shall take effect under sub-
section (a) before the public is given notice of the proposed
waiver and provided a reasonable opportunity to comment
on the proposed waiver. A decision to grant a waiver shall
set out the Secretary’s finding that such a waiver is in
the public interest.
Æ
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Wilderness Man-
agement Act’’. 
SEC. 2. MULTIPLE USE MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL FOR-
EST AND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 
WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS PENDING CON-
GRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF WILDER-
NESS RECOMMENDATION. 
(a) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM.—Section 3(b) of the 
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132(b)) is amended by strik-
ing the fifth sentence and inserting the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘In the case of an area classified as ‘primitive’ on 
the effective date of this Act or designated, officially or 
defacto, by Forest Service action after that date as a ‘wil-
derness study area’, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 
manage the area for multiple use (as defined in section 
4 of the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (16 
U.S.C. 531)), including mining, grazing, conservation, 
recreation, and other uses, until such time as Congress 
enacts a law designating the area as wilderness or speci-
fying an alternative management approach for the area.’’. 
(b) BUREAU
OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC 
LANDS.—Section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)) is amended 
by striking the first sentence and inserting the following 
new sentence: ‘‘In the case of an area described in sub-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:53 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6156.IH
H6156
smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
section (a) or designated, officially or defacto, by Bureau 
of Land Management action after the review period as a 
‘wilderness study area’, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
manage the area according to the authority provided 
under this Act and other applicable law in a manner to 
promote multiple use (as defined in section 4 of the Mul-
tiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (16 U.S.C. 531)), 
including the continuation of existing mining and grazing 
uses and mineral leasing, until such time as Congress en-
acts a law designating the area as wilderness or specifying 
an alternative management approach for the area.’’. 
SEC. 3. LOCAL PARTICIPATION IN DESIGNATION OF WIL-
DERNESS STUDY AREAS. 
The Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to Na-
tional Forest System land, and the Secretary of the Inte-
rior, with respect to public land managed by the Bureau 
of Land Management, may not designate, officially or 
defacto, land as a wilderness study area without the writ-
ten consent of the governing body of the county in which 
the land is located. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:53 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6156.IH
H6156
smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3759
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of
higher education to widely distribute information describing their proce-
dures for receiving and responding to complaints concerning harassment.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 29, 1998
Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require
institutions of higher education to widely distribute infor-
mation describing their procedures for receiving and re-
sponding to complaints concerning harassment.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HARASSMENT PROCEDURE DISCLOSURES RE-
QUIRED.
Section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1092) is amended by adding at end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(h) HARASSMENT PROCEDURE DISCLOSURES RE-
QUIRED.—Each eligible institution participating in any
program under this title shall carry out appropriate and
reasonable information dissemination activities for pro-
spective and enrolled students (including those attending
or planning to attend less than full time) regarding the
procedures established by such institution for receiving
and responding to complaints regarding sexual harass-
ment. Such dissemination activities shall include—
‘‘(1) distribution to prospective and enrolled
students (along with the distribution of information
concerning application for admission to, or enroll-
ment in, the institution) of information—
‘‘(A) identifying the acts that constitute
sexual harassment;
‘‘(B) stating that sexual harassment is ille-
gal; and
‘‘(C) describing the procedures to be fol-
lowed to file a sexual harassment complaint and
to receive services and assistance for the victim;
and
‘‘(2) posting of the information described in
paragraph (1) through bulletins widely distributed
among the buildings, classrooms, student unions,
and other facilities on the campus of such institu-
tion.’’.
SEC. 2. INFORMATION EXCHANGES ON SEXUAL HARASS-
MENT EDUCATION AND PREVENTION PRO-
GRAMS.
Title XII of the Higher Education Act of 1965 is
amended by adding after section 1213 (20 U.S.C. 1145g)
the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 1214. INFORMATION EXCHANGES ON SEXUAL HAR-
ASSMENT 
EDUCATION 
AND 
PREVENTION
PROGRAMS.
‘‘(a) ACTION
BY SECRETARY REQUIRED.—Within
one year after the date of enactment of this section, the
Secretary shall establish a forum, clearinghouse, or other
method by which institutions of higher education may ex-
change information on the programs they have estab-
lished—
‘‘(1) to disseminate the information required to
be provided under section 485(h);
‘‘(2) to educate their students and staffs con-
cerning, and to prevent their students and staffs
from engaging in, sexual harassment; and
‘‘(3) to provide services or assistance to the vic-
tims of sexual assaults.
‘‘(b) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the
Congress a report of the method established by the Sec-
retary to carry out the requirements of subsection (a).’’.
Æ
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 375
AN ACT
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 375
AN ACT
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES FOR ERRONEOUS COMPUTATION OF
RETIRED PAY.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (re-
tired), of Tampa, Florida, the sum of $6,386.30, such
amount representing the amount of retired pay (with in-
terest) that Petty Officer Domantay would have received
for the period beginning on June 8, 1979, and ending on
March 12, 1985, had that retired pay been properly com-
puted based upon pay grade E–5 second class (rather than
pay grade of E–4, third class, with which such retired pay
was computed due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such
section. Any person who violates this section shall be
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in
the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.
Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1998.
Attest:
Clerk.
V
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 375
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 7, 1997
Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (re-
tired), of Tampa, Florida, the amount of retired pay that
he would have received for the period beginning on June
8, 1979, and ending on March 12, 1985, had he been ini-
tially retired in the grade of E–5, second class (rather
than the grade of E–4, third class, in which he was mis-
takenly retired due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such
section. Any person who violates this section shall be
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in
the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.
Æ
HR 4 RFS 
in the case of a project under subsection (b); 
and
‘‘ ‘(B) up to 100 percent, in the case of a 
project under subsection (c). 
‘‘ ‘(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—The non-Federal 
share may be in cash or in kind. In determining the 
amount of the non-Federal share, the Secretary may 
attribute fair market value to goods, services, and 
facilities contributed from non-Federal sources. 
‘‘ ‘SEC. 444. MULTICITY, MULTISTATE DEMONSTRATION 
PROJECTS. 
‘‘ ‘(a) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary may make 
grants under this section for fiscal years 2004 through 
2008 to eligible entities (as specified in subsection (b)) for 
2 multicity, multistate projects demonstrating approaches 
to achieving the objectives specified in section 441(b)(1). 
One of the projects shall test the use of married couples 
to deliver program services. 
‘‘ ‘(b) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—An entity eligible for a 
grant under this section must be a national nonprofit fa-
therhood promotion organization that meets the following 
requirements: 
‘‘ ‘(1) EXPERIENCE
WITH
FATHERHOOD
PRO-
GRAMS.—The organization must have substantial ex-
perience in designing and successfully conducting
HR 375 RFS
SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES FOR ERRONEOUS COMPUTATION OF
RETIRED PAY.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (re-
tired), of Tampa, Florida, the sum of $6,386.30, such
amount representing the amount of retired pay (with in-
terest) that Petty Officer Domantay would have received
for the period beginning on June 8, 1979, and ending on
March 12, 1985, had that retired pay been properly com-
puted based upon pay grade E–5 second class (rather than
pay grade of E–4, third class, with which such retired pay
was computed due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such
section. Any person who violates this section shall be
HR 375 RFS
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in
the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.
Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1998.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress makes the following
findings:
(1) Money laundering is a serious problem: be-
tween $100,000,000,000 and $300,000,000,000 in
United States currency is ‘‘laundered’’ each year.
(2) Money laundering is critical to survival of
the illicit drug trade, which has annual worldwide
revenues of more than $400,000,000,000, more than
8 percent of the total value of international trade.
(3) United States financial institutions are a
critical link in our efforts to combat money launder-
ing.
(4) Highly secretive private banking services
that cater to wealthy clients are particularly vulner-
able to use by drug traffickers for money laundering
purposes and it is estimated that private banking
services 
have 
banking 
assets 
ranging 
from
$200,000,000,000 to $300,000,000,000.
(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are as fol-
lows:
(1) To ensure that United States financial in-
stitutions make combating money laundering the
highest of priorities.
(2) To require the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System to take into consideration a
VII
Private Calendar No. 10
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 375
[Report No. 105–523]
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 7, 1997
Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
MAY 12, 1998
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (re-
tired), of Tampa, Florida, the amount of retired pay that
he would have received for the period beginning on June
8, 1979, and ending on March 12, 1985, had he been ini-
tially retired in the grade of E–5, second class (rather
than the grade of E–4, third class, in which he was mis-
takenly retired due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such
section. Any person who violates this section shall be
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in
the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.
SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES FOR ERRONEOUS COMPUTATION OF
RETIRED PAY.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (retired),
of Tampa, Florida, the sum of $6,386.30, such amount rep-
resenting the amount of retired pay (with interest) that
Petty Officer Domantay would have received for the period
beginning on June 8, 1979, and ending on March 12, 1985,
had that retired pay been properly computed based upon
pay grade E–5 second class (rather than pay grade of E–
4, third class, with which such retired pay was computed
due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such sec-
tion. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty
of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in the amount
provided in title 18, United States Code.
Private Calendar No. 10
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 375
[Report No. 105–523]
A BILL
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
MAY 12, 1998
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commit-
tee of the Whole House, and ordered to be printed
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3760
To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to require the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to include money laundering
activities in the consideration of applications under section 3 of the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 29, 1998
Ms. WATERS (for herself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr.
RUSH, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services
A BILL
To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to re-
quire the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System to include money laundering activities in the
consideration of applications under section 3 of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Merger Money
Laundering Prevention Act’’.
laundering activities, including in overseas
branches;
‘‘(B) the Board shall not consider any ap-
plication under this section involving any com-
pany which is the subject of any—
‘‘(i) pending Federal investigation of
possible money laundering or other related
financial crimes; or
‘‘(ii) pending Federal prosecution for
money laundering or other related financial
crimes,
until such investigation or prosecution is com-
pleted and a finding is made, except that this
subparagraph shall not apply if the period for
such completion and the making of findings ex-
ceeds 3 years; and
‘‘(C) the Board shall disapprove any appli-
cation under this section involving any company
which has been found criminally or civilly liable
for money laundering or any related financial
crime during the 5-year period preceding the
consideration of such application by the
Board.’’.
(b) SCOPE OF APPLICATION.—The amendment made
by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any applica-
tion submitted to the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System under section 3 of the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 after December 31, 1997, which
has not been approved by the Board before the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Æ
V
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3761
To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain customs entries
of nuclear fuel assemblies.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 30, 1998
Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain
customs entries of nuclear fuel assemblies.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NUCLEAR FUEL ASSEMBLIES.
Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of
1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request
filed with the Customs Service before the 90th day after
the date of enactment of this Act, the customs entries list-
ed in section 2 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if,
at the time such entries were made, the following addi-
tional U.S. note to chapter 84 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States was in effect:
‘‘3. Subheading 8401.30.00 applies only to fuel
rods which are collected into bundles to form fuel as-
semblies. Enriched uranium compound shipped
abroad and converted into sintered, enriched ura-
nium dioxide pellets and then inserted into zir-
conium alloy tubing which is sealed by the means of
plugs which are welded into either end are to be
classified as follows:
‘‘(a) The uranium pellets are to be classi-
fied under subheading 2844.20.00 as uranium
oxide.
‘‘(b) The zirconium tubing is to be classi-
fied as an article of base metal under sub-
heading 8109.90.00.’’.
SEC. 2. APPLICATION.
Section 1 shall apply to each of the following entries,
and the Secretary of the Treasury shall refund the amount
by which the duty previously posted or paid on such entry
exceeds the amount of duty that would have been paid on
such entry if the provisions of section 1 were in effect on
the date of such entry:
Entry Number:
Entry Date:
062–230014–5 ........................................
January 16, 1996
062–230085–5 ........................................
February 13, 1996.
Æ