311 
mitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 
7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Develop-
ment Act (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ‘‘Report to Con-
gress on Future Water Resources Development’’, or 
have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. 
(2) MODIFICATIONS.— 
(A) ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUN-
TIES, CALIFORNIA.—Section 219(f)(80) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 
1258) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
(B) CALAVERAS
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.— 
Section 219(f)(86) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1259; 136 Stat. 3816) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$13,280,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$16,300,000’’. 
(C) 
CONTRA
COSTA
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—Section 219(f)(87) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1259) is 
amended—
312 
(i) in the paragraph heading, by strik-
ing ‘‘WATER
DISTRICT’’ and inserting 
‘‘COUNTY’’; 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘$80,000,000, of 
which 
not 
less 
than’’ 
before 
‘‘$23,000,000’’; 
(iii) by inserting ‘‘shall be’’ after 
‘‘$23,000,000’’; and 
(iv) by inserting ‘‘service area, and of 
which not less than $57,000,000 shall be 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management and 
water supply, within the service areas for 
the Delta Diablo Sanitation District and 
the Ironhouse Sanitary District, Contra 
Costa County’’ after ‘‘Water District’’. 
(D) 
LOS
ANGELES
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—Section 219(f)(93) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1259; 136 Stat. 
3816) is amended— 
(i) by striking ‘‘$103,000,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$128,000,000’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Santa Clarity Valley’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Santa Clarita Valley’’.
313 
(E) LOS
ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.—Sec-
tion 8319(e)(1) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2022 (136 Stat. 3785) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$100,000,000’’. 
(F) LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.— 
(i) PROJECT
DESCRIPTION.—Section 
219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 114 
Stat. 2763A–219; 121 Stat. 1209) is 
amended by striking ‘‘Wastewater’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Water and wastewater’’. 
(ii) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIA-
TIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.— 
Section 219(e)(15) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
110 Stat. 3757; 121 Stat. 1192) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘$35,000,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$43,000,000’’. 
(G) SAN
BERNARDINO
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—Section 219(f)(101) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260) is modi-
314 
fied by striking ‘‘$9,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$24,000,000’’. 
(H) SOUTH PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—Section 
219(f)(52) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
114 Stat. 2763A–220; 134 Stat. 2718) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$100,000,000’’. 
(I) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(129) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by striking 
‘‘$7,500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$57,500,000’’. 
(J) 
ATLANTA, 
GEORGIA.—Section 
219(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 
113 Stat. 334) is amended by striking 
‘‘$75,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000,000’’. 
(K) 
EAST
POINT, 
GEORGIA.—Section 
219(f)(136) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1261; 136 Stat. 3817) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$20,000,000’’.