datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
courage the use of tobacco products, and
school-based and child-oriented education pro-
grams to discourage the use of tobacco prod-
ucts, and for ongoing evaluations of these pro-
grams.
‘‘(II) Activities to fund research related to
nicotine addiction, tobacco use cessation, and
prevention of the use of tobacco products, in-
cluding surveillance and epidemiology research
related to tobacco.
‘‘(III) Activities to assist in economic de-
velopment efforts designed to aid tobacco farm-
ers and workers and communities as they tran-
sition to a more broadly diversified economy;
and
‘‘(ii) the expenditures include an annual con-
tribution by the State of its pro rata share for the
National Tobacco Use Prevention Program (under
section 3 of the Tobacco Use Prevention and Public
Health Act of 1999).
‘‘(D) For purposes of subparagraph (B)(ii), the ex-
penditures described in this subparagraph are State ex-
penditures for outreach activities in enrolling individuals
under this title and State expenditures for medical assist-
ance with respect to individuals who are eligible for such
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1286
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases
presumed to be service connected with respect to radiation-exposed veterans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. EVANS (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms.
BROWN of Florida, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Ms. CARSON, Mr.
REYES, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. OLVER, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms.
MCKINNEY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD,
Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. KLECZKA, and Mr. FROST) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list
of diseases presumed to be service connected with respect
to radiation-exposed veterans.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Atomic Vet-
erans Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF LIST OF DISEASES PRESUMED TO
BE SERVICE CONNECTED FOR RADIATION-EX-
POSED VETERANS.
Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(P) Lung cancer.
‘‘(Q) Bone cancer.
‘‘(R) Skin cancer.
‘‘(S) Colon cancer.
‘‘(T) Posterior subcapsular cataracts.
‘‘(U) Non-malignant thyroid nodular disease.
‘‘(V) Ovarian cancer.
‘‘(W) Parathyroid adenoma.
‘‘(X) Tumors of the brain and central nervous
system.
‘‘(Y) Rectal cancer.’’.
Æ
I
#
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1287
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to grant relief to participants
in multiemployer plans from certain section 415 limits on retirement plans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. WELLER (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. HOUGHTON,
Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. QUINN, Mr. LAHOOD, Mrs. KELLY,
Mr. LOBIONDO, and Mr. METCALF) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to grant
relief to participants in multiemployer plans from certain
section 415 limits on retirement plans.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
UNDER SECTION 415 LIMIT ON RETIREMENT
PLAN BENEFITS.
(a) DOLLAR LIMIT REDUCTION.—Subparagraph (F)
of section 415(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(relating to plans maintained by governments and tax-ex-
empt organizations) is amended—
HR 1287 IH1S
(1) by striking ‘‘AND TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZA-
TIONS’’ in the heading and inserting ‘‘, TAX-EXEMPT
ORGANIZATIONS, AND MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS’’, and
(2) by inserting in the first sentence ‘‘a multi-
employer plan (as defined in section 414(f)),’’ after
‘‘subtitle,’’.
(b) AVERAGE COMPENSATION LIMIT.—Paragraph
(11) of section 415(b) of such Code (relating to a special
limitation rule for governmental plans) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(11) SPECIAL LIMITATION RULE FOR GOVERN-
MENTAL AND MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS.—In the case
of a governmental plan (as defined in section
414(d)) or a multiemployer plan (as defined in sec-
tion 414(f)), subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1)
shall not apply.’’.
(c) MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS NOT COMBINED OR AG-
GREGATED WITH OTHER PLANS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 415
of such Code (relating to combining of plans) is
amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
‘‘(3) 
EXCEPTION
FOR
MULTIEMPLOYER
PLAN.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1) and sub-
section (g), a multiemployer plan (as defined in sec-
HR 1287 IH1S
tion 414(f)) shall not be combined or aggregated
with any other plan maintained by an employer for
purposes of applying the limitations established in
this section.’’.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (g)
of section 415 of such Code (relating to aggregation
of plans) is amended by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’
and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection
(f)(3), the Secretary’’.
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to years beginning after December
31, 1999.
Æ
improve the prices producers receive for the commod-
ities.’’.
SEC. 5. EXPANDED ENROLLMENT AUTHORITY UNDER CON-
SERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.
Section 1231(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985
(16 U.S.C. 3831(d)) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary’’;
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
‘‘(2) Notwithstanding the limitation in paragraph (1)
on the total acreage authorized to be maintained in the
conservation reserve, the Secretary may enroll additional
acreage in the reserve to the extent that amounts are ap-
propriated in advance specifically for that purpose in an-
nual appropriations Acts.’’.
SEC. 6. EARLY RELEASE OF CERTAIN ACREAGE ENROLLED
IN CONSERVATION RESERVE.
The Food Security Act of 1985 is amended by insert-
ing after section 1231 (16 U.S.C. 3831) the following new
section:
‘‘SEC. 1231A. EARLY RELEASE OF CERTAIN ACREAGE EN-
ROLLED IN CONSERVATION RESERVE.
‘‘(a) EARLY RELEASE AUTHORITY.—If the Secretary
determines that, as a result of the enrollment of land in
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1291
AN ACT
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on
Internet service providers, and for other purposes.
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1291
AN ACT
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet
service providers, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Access Charge
Prohibition Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON PROVIDERS OF
INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.
Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47
U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(l) PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON INTERNET SERV-
ICE PROVIDERS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection
(b)(4) or (d) or any other provision of this title, the
Commission shall not impose on any provider of
Internet access service (as such term is defined in
section 231(e)) any contribution for the support of
universal service that is based on a measure of the
time that telecommunications services are used in
the provision of such Internet access service.
‘‘(2) RULE
OF
CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in
this subsection shall preclude the Commission from
imposing access charges on the providers of Internet
telephone services, irrespective of the type of cus-
tomer premises equipment used in connection with
such services.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2000.
Attest:
Clerk.
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1291
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet service providers,
and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. UPTON (for himself, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr.
BILBRAY, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. EWING, Mr. POMBO, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr.
RAHALL, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. WELLER, Mr. MICA, Mr.
BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. REGULA, Mr. WOLF, Mr.
GOODE, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. CAN-
ADY of Florida, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr.
KUYKENDALL, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. CLYBURN, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr.
TANCREDO, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr.
STEARNS, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr.
BLUNT, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. LAZIO, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania,
Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. SAM JOHNSON, of Texas, Mr. BAKER,
Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. LINDER, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. DUN-
CAN, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. OSE, Mr. CAMP, Mr. GOOD-
LATTE, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.
LIPINSKI, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. BARCIA, and Mr. SCAR-
BOROUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Commerce
A BILL
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet
service providers, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Access Charge
Prohibition Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
It is the purpose of this Act to ensure that Internet
information services will continue to be deployed as rapidly
and efficiently to as many Americans as possible by pre-
venting the Federal Communications Commission from
applying interstate access charges to providers of Internet
services.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF ACCESS CHARGES ON INTERNET
SERVICE PROVIDERS.
Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47
U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(l) PROHIBITION OF ACCESS CHARGES ON INTER-
NET SERVICE PROVIDERS.—Notwithstanding subsection
(b)(4) or (d) or any other provision of this section, the
Commission shall not impose on any interactive computer
service (as such term is defined in section 230(e)) or other
information service provider any access charge for the sup-
port of universal service that is based on a measure of
the time that telecommunications services are used in the
provision of such interactive computer service or informa-
tion service.’’.
Æ
II
Calendar No. 577
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1291
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MAY 17, 2000
Recieved
MAY 24, 2000
Read the first time
MAY 25, 2000
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
AN ACT
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet
service providers, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 1291 PCS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Access Charge
Prohibition Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON PROVIDERS OF
INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.
Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47
U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(l) PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON INTERNET SERV-
ICE PROVIDERS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection
(b)(4) or (d) or any other provision of this title, the
Commission shall not impose on any provider of
Internet access service (as such term is defined in
section 231(e)) any contribution for the support of
universal service that is based on a measure of the
time that telecommunications services are used in
the provision of such Internet access service.
‘‘(2) RULE
OF
CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in
this subsection shall preclude the Commission from
imposing access charges on the providers of Internet
telephone services, irrespective of the type of cus-
HR 1291 PCS
tomer premises equipment used in connection with
such services.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2000.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
Calendar No. 577
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1291
AN ACT
To prohibit the imposition of access charges on
Internet service providers, and for other purposes.
MAY 25, 2000
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1292
To provide that no Federal income tax shall be imposed on amounts received
by Holocaust victims or their heirs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. WELLER (for himself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. PORTER, and Mr. HAYWORTH)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means
A BILL
To provide that no Federal income tax shall be imposed
on amounts received by Holocaust victims or their heirs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX ON AMOUNTS RE-
CEIVED BY HOLOCAUST VICTIMS OR THEIR
HEIRS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include any
amount received by an individual (or any heir of the indi-
vidual) from any person as a result of any moral or legal
injustice experienced by such individual as a Holocaust
victim.
(b) HOLOCAUST VICTIM.—For purposes of this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘Holocaust victim’’ means any individual
who was persecuted for racial or religious reasons by Nazi
Germany or any other Axis regime as a result of the Holo-
caust.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to
any amount received before, on, or after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1293
To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable treatment with
respect to State and local income taxes for certain individuals who
perform duties on vessels.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. BAIRD (for himself, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. EVANS, Ms. LEE, Mr. LIPINSKI,
Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. METCALF, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. SHOWS, Mr.
SIMPSON, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. WISE) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and
in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the com-
mittee concerned
A BILL
To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable
treatment with respect to State and local income taxes
for certain individuals who perform duties on vessels.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Em-
ployee Fair Taxation Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS EM-
PLOYED ON VESSELS WITH RESPECT TO
STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAXES.
Section 11108 of title 46, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence;
and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(b)(1) An individual described in paragraph (2)
shall not be subject to the income tax laws of a State or
political subdivision of a State with respect to employment
or work referred to in paragraph (2), other than the State
and political subdivision in which the individual resides.
‘‘(2) An individual referred to in paragraph (1) is—
‘‘(A) any individual engaged on a vessel to per-
form assigned duties in more than one State as a
pilot licensed under section 7101 of this title or li-
censed or authorized under the laws of a State; or
‘‘(B) any individual who performs regularly as-
signed duties while engaged as a master, officer, or
crewman on a vessel operating on the navigable wa-
ters of more than one State.’’.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1294
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period for
filing for a credit or refund of individual income taxes from 3 to 7 years.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. BAKER (for himself, Mr. MCCRERY, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend
the period for filing for a credit or refund of individual
income taxes from 3 to 7 years.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR FILING FOR CRED-
IT OR REFUND OF INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 6511 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations
on credit or refund) is amended by adding at the end the
following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of applying this
section with respect to tax imposed by subtitle A on an
individual, the reference to 3 years in the first sentence,
each reference in this section to such 3 years, and each
reference to 3 years in subsection (b)(2) and in para-
graphs (2) and (4) of subsection (d) shall be applied by
treating such references as references to 7 years.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to taxes paid for taxable years
ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1295
To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide for
the expulsion from school and termination of educational services with
respect to a child with a disability who carries a weapon to school
or to a school function.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
to provide for the expulsion from school and termination
of educational services with respect to a child with a
disability who carries a weapon to school or to a school
function.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPULSION FROM SCHOOL AND TERMINATION
OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES FOR A CHILD
WITH A DISABILITY WHO CARRIES A WEAPON
TO SCHOOL.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 615(k) of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1415(k)) is
amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraph (10) as para-
graph (11); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(10) EXPULSION AND TERMINATION OF EDU-
CATIONAL SERVICES WITH RESPECT POSSESSION OF
WEAPONS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Act, school personnel
under this section shall order the expulsion
from school and termination of educational
services with respect to a child with a disability
who carries a weapon to school or to a school
function under the jurisdiction of a State or a
local educational agency.
‘‘(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Except to
the extent inconsistent with the purpose of sub-
paragraph (A), a child with a disability de-
scribed in subparagraph (A) shall be afforded
the same procedural protections, if any, that
would be applied to a child without a disability
who carries a weapon to school or to a school
function under the jurisdiction of a State or a
local educational agency.’’.
(b) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
612(a)(1)(A) of the Individuals with Disabilities Edu-
cation Act (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(1)(A)) is amended by add-
ing at the end before the period the following: ‘‘(except
as provided in section 615(k)(10) of this Act)’’.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1296
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an outpatient clinic
in the Seventh Congressional District of Georgia.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
A BILL
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish an
outpatient clinic in the Seventh Congressional District
of Georgia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF OUTPATIENT VETERANS
CLINIC IN SEVENTH CONGRESSIONAL DIS-
TRICT OF GEORGIA.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish an
outpatient clinic in the Seventh Congressional District of
Georgia. The Secretary shall ensure that such clinic has
adequate staffing and resources to meet the needs of vet-
erans in that congressional district for outpatient care.
Æ
the enactment of this subsection to reflect the re-
quirements of paragraph (1).’’.
SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF MARKETING LOAN TERM.
Section 133 of the Agricultural Market Transition
Act (7 U.S.C. 7233) is amended by striking subsection
(c) and inserting the following new subsection:
‘‘(c) EXTENSIONS
AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary
may extend the term of a marketing assistance loan for
any loan commodity for a period not to exceed 6 months.’’.
SEC. 4. CONSIDERATION OF CROPS TYPICALLY GROWN ON
LANDS ELIGIBLE FOR ENROLLMENT IN CON-
SERVATION RESERVE.
Section 1231 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16
U.S.C. 3831) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subsection:
‘‘(h) CONSIDERATION OF CROPS GROWN ON LANDS
OTHERWISE ELIGIBLE FOR ENROLLMENT.—In the case
of the croplands described in paragraphs (1) and (4) of
subsection (b) that are eligible for enrollment in the con-
servation reserve, the Secretary may consider the types of
agricultural commodities typically grown on the lands for
the purpose of enrolling lands that, while promoting the
conservation and water quality objectives of this sub-
chapter, will also reduce excess productive capacity and
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1298
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit public schools
and certain other entities to determine presumptive eligibility for children
under the Medicaid Program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 25, 1999
Mr. BENTSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Commerce
A BILL
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit
public schools and certain other entities to determine
presumptive eligibility for children under the Medicaid
Program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Child Eligi-
bility Improvement Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ENTITIES ELIGIBLE TO MAKE PRE-
SUMPTIVE 
ELIGIBILITY 
DETERMINATIONS
FOR CHILDREN UNDER THE MEDICAID PRO-
GRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1920A(b)(3)(A)(i) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–1a(b)(3)(A)(i)) is
amended
(1) by striking ‘‘or (II)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (II)’’;
and
(2) by inserting before the semicolon the fol-
lowing: ‘‘, or eligibility of a child under the State
child health plan under title XXI, or (III) is an ele-
mentary school or secondary school, as such terms
are defined in section 14101 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801),
is a child care resource and referral agency or a
child support enforcement agency, or is a public or
nonprofit entity that receives Federal funds under
title III or IV of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331, 11361 et seq.) or
under part A or B of title III of the Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
5711, 5714–1 et seq.)’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment
of this Act.
Æ