datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2456 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act to eliminate certain mandatory minimum pen-
alties relating to crack cocaine offenses. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 18, 2005 
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the juris-
diction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 
Substances Import and Export Act to eliminate certain 
mandatory minimum penalties relating to crack cocaine 
offenses. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crack-Cocaine Equi-
table Sentencing Act of 2005’’.
SEC. 2. TREATING CRACK AND OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE 
THE SAME FOR TRAFFICKING PENALTIES. 
(a) TREATING 50 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 
50 GRAMS
OF OTHER FORMS
OF COCAINE.—Section 
401(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
841(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking clause (iii). 
(b) TREATING 5 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 5 
GRAMS
OF
OTHER
FORMS
OF
COCAINE.—Section 
401(b)(1)(B) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
841(b)(1)(B)) is amended by striking clause (iii). 
SEC. 3. TREATING THE POSSESSION OF CRACK THE SAME 
AS THE POSSESSION OF OTHER FORMS OF 
COCAINE. 
Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 844(a)) is amended by striking the sentence that 
begins ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence’’. 
SEC. 4. TREATING THE IMPORTATION OF CRACK THE SAME 
AS THE IMPORTATION OF OTHER FORMS OF 
COCAINE. 
(a) TREATING 50 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 
50 GRAMS
OF OTHER FORMS
OF COCAINE.—Section 
1010(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Import and Ex-
port Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(1)) is amended by striking out 
subparagraph (C). 
(b) TREATING 5 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 5 
GRAMS
OF
OTHER
FORMS
OF
COCAINE.—Section
1010(b)(2) of the Controlled Substances Import and Ex-
port Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(2)) is amended by striking out 
subparagraph (C). 
SEC. 5. SENTENCING COMMISSION TO AMEND GUIDELINES. 
As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the United States Sentencing Commission 
shall promulgate such amendments to the Sentencing 
Guidelines as are necessary to conform those Guidelines 
to the amendments made by this Act. 
Æ
381 
HR 2864 PCS 
(2) The uncompleted portions of the project au-
thorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1968 (82 Stat. 740), Martin County, Florida modi-
fications to the Central and South Florida Project, 
as contained in Senate Document 101, 90th Con-
gress, 2d Session. 
(3) The uncompleted portions of the project au-
thorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1968 (82 Stat. 740), East Coast Backpumping, St. 
Lucie—Martin County, Spillway Structure S–311 of 
the Central and South Florida Project, as contained 
in House Document 369, 90th Congress, 2d Session. 
SEC. 6009. MODIFIED WATER DELIVERY. 
(a) TAMIAMI TRAIL.—The Secretary shall not carry 
out a project for raising Tamiami Trail, Florida, until 
such date as the project is specifically authorized by law. 
(b) REPORTS.—The Secretary shall submit to Con-
gress reports recommending specific authorizations in law 
for— 
(1) changes to the project to improve water de-
liveries to Everglades National Park, authorized by 
section 104 of the Everglades National Park Protec-
tion and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r– 
8), if necessary;
382 
HR 2864 PCS 
(2) a project to raise Tamiami Trail, Florida, 
if necessary; and 
(3) a combined structural and operational plan 
for the C–111 Canal Project, authorized by section 
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
1176), and modified by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), and further 
modified by section 316 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3715), and the 
project to improve water deliveries to Everglades 
National Park. 
TITLE VII—LOUISIANA COASTAL 
AREA 
SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS. 
In this title, the following definitions apply: 
(1) COASTAL
LOUISIANA
ECOSYSTEM.—The 
term ‘‘coastal Louisiana ecosystem’’ means the 
coastal area of Louisiana from the Sabine River on 
the west and the Pearl River on the east, including 
those parts of the Deltaic Plain and the Chenier 
Plain included within the study area of the Plan. 
(2) GOVERNOR.—The term ‘‘Governor’’ means 
the Governor of the State of Louisiana. 
(3) PLAN.—The term ‘‘Plan’’ means the report 
of the Chief of Engineers for ecosystem restoration
579 
new standards have been required within the prior 
6 years. 
‘‘(iv) The Secretary shall promptly submit to 
the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and 
to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources a progress report every 180 days on com-
pliance with this paragraph, including a specific plan 
to remedy any failures to comply with deadlines for 
action set forth in this paragraph.’’. 
SEC. 9010. UPDATING APPLIANCE TEST PROCEDURES. 
(a) CONSUMER APPLIANCES.—Section 323(b)(1)(A) 
of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6923(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘The Secretary 
may’’ and all that follows through ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘At least every 7 years the Secretary shall review 
test procedures for all covered products and shall— 
‘‘(i) amend test procedures with respect to any 
covered product if the Secretary determines that 
amended test procedures would more accurately or 
fully comply with the requirements of paragraph (3); 
or 
‘‘(ii) publish notice in the Federal Register of 
any determination not to amend a test procedure’’. 
(b) INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT.—Section 343(a)(1) of 
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C.
IV 
House Calendar No. 273 
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 1490 
[Report No. 110–879] 
Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 
Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 
which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 
RESOLUTION 
Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 
respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 
from the Committee on Rules. 
Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 
XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 
Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 
the House is waived with respect to any resolution re-
ported on any legislative day through September 27, 2008, 
providing for consideration or disposition of a measure to 
provide incentives for energy production and conservation, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:08 Sep 24, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR1490.RH
HR1490
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2457 
To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to allow community 
reinvestment credit for investments and other financial support to enable 
employees to establish certain employee stock ownership plans or eligible 
worker owned cooperatives. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 18, 2005 
Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. MANZULLO, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. ROHR-
ABACHER, and Ms. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Financial Services 
A BILL 
To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to 
allow community reinvestment credit for investments and 
other financial support to enable employees to establish 
certain employee stock ownership plans or eligible worker 
owned cooperatives. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Ownership 
Opportunity Act’’.
SEC. 2. COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT CREDIT. 
Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of 
1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) ESTABLISHMENT OF ESOPS AND EWOCS.—In 
assessing and taking into account, under subsection (a), 
the record of a financial institution, the appropriate Fed-
eral financial supervisory agency shall consider as a factor 
capital investments, loans, loan participation, technical as-
sistance, and grants by the institution to support or enable 
employees to establish employee stock ownership plans or 
eligible worker owned cooperatives that are at least 51 per-
cent employee-owned plans or cooperatives and employ 
low- to moderate-income workers.’’. 
Æ
(5) Using the existing infrastructure of the 
Small Business Development Center program, small 
businesses owned by Indian tribe members, Native 
Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians receiving services 
under the program will have a higher survival rate 
than the average small business not receiving such 
services. 
(6) Business counseling and technical assist-
ance is critical on Indian lands where similar serv-
ices are scarce and expensive. 
(7) Increased assistance through counseling 
under the Small Business Development Center pro-
gram has been shown to reduce the default rate as-
sociated with lending programs of the Small Busi-
ness Administration. 
(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are as fol-
lows: 
(1) To stimulate economies on Indian lands. 
(2) To foster economic development on Indian 
lands. 
(3) To assist in the creation of new small busi-
nesses owned by Indian tribe members, Native Alas-
kans, and Native Hawaiians and expand existing 
ones.
(4) To provide management, technical, and re-
search assistance to small businesses owned by In-
dian tribe members, Native Alaskans, and Native 
Hawaiians. 
(5) To seek the advice of local Tribal Councils 
on where small business development assistance is 
most needed. 
(6) To ensure that Indian tribe members, Na-
tive Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians have full access 
to existing business counseling and technical assist-
ance available through the Small Business Develop-
ment Center program. 
SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ASSIST-
ANCE TO INDIAN TRIBE MEMBERS, NATIVE 
ALASKANS, AND NATIVE HAWAIIANS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 21(a) of the Small Busi-
ness Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(8) ADDITIONAL
GRANT
TO
ASSIST
INDIAN 
TRIBE MEMBERS, NATIVE ALASKANS, AND NATIVE 
HAWAIIANS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any applicant in an 
eligible State that is funded by the Administra-
tion as a Small Business Development Center 
may apply for an additional grant to be used
solely to provide services described in subsection 
(c)(3) to assist with outreach, development, and 
enhancement on Indian lands of small business 
startups and expansions owned by Indian tribe 
members, Native Alaskans, and Native Hawai-
ians. 
‘‘(B) ELIGIBLE STATES.—For purposes of 
subparagraph (A), an eligible State is a State 
that has a combined population of Indian tribe 
members, Natives Alaskans, and Native Hawai-
ians that comprises at least 1 percent of the 
State’s total population, as shown by the latest 
available census. 
‘‘(C) GRANT APPLICATIONS.—An applicant 
for a grant under subparagraph (A) shall sub-
mit to the Associate Administrator an applica-
tion that is in such form as the Associate Ad-
ministrator may require. The application shall 
include information regarding the applicant’s 
goals and objectives for the services to be pro-
vided using the grant, including— 
‘‘(i) the capability of the applicant to 
provide training and services to a rep-
resentative number of Indian tribe mem-
bers, Native Alaskans, and Native Hawai-
ians; 
‘‘(ii) the location of the Small Busi-
ness Development Center site proposed by 
the applicant; 
‘‘(iii) the required amount of grant 
funding needed by the applicant to imple-
ment the program; and 
‘‘(iv) the extent to which the applicant 
has consulted with local Tribal Councils. 
‘‘(D) APPLICABILITY OF GRANT REQUIRE-
MENTS.—An applicant for a grant under sub-
paragraph (A) shall comply with all of the re-
quirements of this section, except that the 
matching funds requirements of paragraph 
(4)(A) shall not apply. 
‘‘(E) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF GRANTS.—No 
applicant may receive more than $300,000 in 
grants under this paragraph in a fiscal year. 
‘‘(F) REGULATIONS.—After providing no-
tice and an opportunity for comment and after 
consulting with the Association recognized by 
the Administration pursuant to paragraph 
(3)(A) (but not later than 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this paragraph), the Ad-
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2458 
To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 18, 2005 
Mr. SHADEGG (for himself, Mr. OTTER, Mr. HERGER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of 
Texas, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. SOUDER, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, 
Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. BART-
LETT of Maryland, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HOEKSTRA, 
Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. TIAHRT, 
Mr. COX, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and Mr. GOODE) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
Judiciary 
A BILL 
To require Congress to specify the source of authority under 
the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, 
and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enumerated Powers 
Act’’.
SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY 
FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW. 
(a) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THIS ACT.— 
This Act is enacted pursuant to the power granted Con-
gress under article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United 
States Constitution and the power granted to each House 
of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the 
United States Constitution. 
(b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT RE-
QUIRED.—Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 102 the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 102a. Constitutional authority clause 
‘‘Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and 
definite statement of the constitutional authority relied 
upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. The 
failure to comply with this section shall give rise to a point 
of order in either House of Congress. The availability of 
this point of order does not affect any other available re-
lief.’’ 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 102 the following new item: 
‘‘102a. Constitutional authority clause.’’. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2459 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of combed Kashmir 
(cashmere) and yarn of camel hair. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 18, 2005 
Mr. SIMMONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of 
combed Kashmir (cashmere) and yarn of camel hair. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. YARN OF COMBED KASHMIR (CASHMERE) OR 
YARN OF CAMEL HAIR. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.01 of the Har-
monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
yarn of combed Kashmir (cashmere) or yarn of camel 
hair) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 
‘‘12/31/2008’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 
the date of enactment of this Act. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 245
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to the record 
of admission for permanent residence in the case of certain aliens. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 6, 2005
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect 
to the record of admission for permanent residence in 
the case of certain aliens.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Date of Registry and 
Legal Amnesty Restoration Act of 2005’’. 
SEC. 2. RECORD OF ADMISSION FOR PERMANENT RESI-
DENCE IN THE CASE OF CERTAIN ALIENS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 249 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1259) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘January 1, 
1972’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 1986’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘january 1, 1972’’ in the head-
ing and inserting ‘‘January 1, 1986’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—
(1) GENERAL RULE.—The amendments made 
by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act. 
(2) EXTENSION OF DATE OF REGISTRY.—
(A) 
PERIOD
BEGINNING
JANUARY
1, 
2006.—Beginning on January 1, 2006, section 
249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1259) is amended by striking ‘‘January 
1, 1986’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘January 1, 1987’’. 
(B) 
PERIOD
BEGINNING
JANUARY
1, 
2007.—Beginning on January 1, 2007, section 
249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu-
ary 1, 1987’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘January 1, 1988’’. 
(C) 
PERIOD
BEGINNING
JANUARY
1, 
2008.—Beginning on January 1, 2008, section 
249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu-
ary 1, 1988’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘January 1, 1989’’.
(D) 
PERIOD
BEGINNING
JANUARY
1, 
2009.—Beginning on January 1, 2009, section 
249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu-
ary 1, 1989’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘January 1, 1990’’. 
(E) 
PERIOD
BEGINNING
JANUARY
1, 
2010.—Beginning on January 1, 2010, section 
249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu-
ary 1, 1990’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘January 1, 1991’’.
Æ
(i) credit up to $6,500,000 toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
for the cost of planning and design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest in 
accordance with the project study plan 
dated November 28, 1999; and 
(ii) credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of de-
sign and construction work carried out by 
the non-Federal interest before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if 
the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project. 
(C) 
ADDITIONAL
FLOOD
STORAGE
AT 
SKOOKUMCHUCK DAM.—The Secretary shall inte-
grate into the project the locally preferred plan 
to provide an additional 9,000 acre-feet of stor-
age capacity at Skookumchuck Dam, Wash-
ington, upon a determination by the Secretary 
that providing such additional storage capacity 
is feasible. 
SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUC-
TION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary
determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s): 
(1) HALEYVILLE, ALABAMA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Haleyville, Alabama. 
(2) WEISS
LAKE, ALABAMA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama. 
(3) CHINO VALLEY WASH, ARIZONA.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Chino Valley Wash, Arizona. 
(4) LITTLE COLORADO RIVER LEVEE, ARIZONA.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Little Colorado 
River Levee, Arizona. 
(5) CACHE RIVER BASIN, GRUBBS, ARKANSAS.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Cache River 
Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas. 
(6) BARREL SPRINGS WASH, PALMDALE, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Barrel 
Springs Wash, Palmdale, California. 
(7) BORREGO SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Borrego Springs, California. 
(8) COLTON, 
CALIFORNIA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Colton, California. 
(9) DUNLAP STREAM, SAN BERNARDINO, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Dunlap 
Stream, San Bernardino, California.
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2460 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain yarn of carded 
Kashmir (cashmere). 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 18, 2005 
Mr. SIMMONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain yarn 
of carded Kashmir (cashmere). 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CERTAIN YARN OF CARDED KASHMIR (CASH-
MERE). 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.02 of the Har-
monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
certain yarn of carded Kashmir (cashmere)) is amended 
as follows:
(1) By striking ‘‘of 6 run or finer (equivalent 
to 19.35 metric yarn system)’’ and inserting ‘‘of 
19.35 metric yarn count or finer’’. 
(2) By striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 
‘‘12/31/2008’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 
the date of enactment of this Act. 
Æ
(10) HUNTS
CANYON
WASH, PALMDALE, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Hunts 
Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California. 
(11) WILDWOOD CREEK, YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, 
Yucaipa, California. 
(12) UTICA AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Utica and vicinity, Illinois. 
(13) 
DES
MOINES
AND
RACCOON
RIVERS, 
IOWA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Des 
Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Iowa. 
(14) PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Peabody, Massachusetts. 
(15) SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Salem, Massachusetts. 
(16) CASS RIVER, MICHIGAN.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, 
Michigan. 
(17) CROW
RIVER, ROCKFORD, MINNESOTA.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Crow River, Rock-
ford, Minnesota. 
(18) ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, 
Itasca County, Minnesota.
(19) MARSH
CREEK, MINNESOTA.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota. 
(20) ROSEAU
RIVER, ROSEAU, MINNESOTA.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Roseau River, 
Roseau, Minnesota. 
(21) SOUTH BRANCH OF THE WILD RICE RIVER, 
BORUP, MINNESOTA.—Project for flood damage reduc-
tion, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
Minnesota. 
(22) BLACKSNAKE
CREEK, ST. JOSEPH, MIS-
SOURI.—Project for flood damage reduction, Black-
snake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri. 
(23) CANNISTEO RIVER, ADDISON, NEW YORK.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Cannisteo River, 
Addison, New York. 
(24) COHOCTON RIVER, CAMPBELL, NEW YORK.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Cohocton River, 
Campbell, New York. 
(25) EAST
RIVER, SILVER
BEACH, NEW
YORK 
CITY, NEW YORK.—Project for flood damage reduction, 
East River, Silver Beach, New York City, New York. 
(26) EAST
VALLEY
CREEK, 
ANDOVER, 
NEW 
YORK.—Project for flood damage reduction, East Val-
ley Creek, Andover, New York.