1174 
HR 5515 PCS
(including the INF Treaty), and has made explicit 
nuclear threats against the United States and the al-
lies of the United States; 
(7) the United States remains committed to its 
full range of nuclear arms control and nonprolifera-
tion obligations and seeks continued engagement for 
prudent and verifiable agreements, however, the poli-
cies and actions of the United States must also hold 
states that violate arms control treaties accountable 
for such violations and take such violations into ac-
count when considering further arms control agree-
ments; 
(8) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
(NATO) plays an essential role in the national secu-
rity of the United States and NATO should continue 
to strengthen and align its nuclear and conventional 
deterrence posture, planning, and exercises to align 
with modern threats, including modernizing its dual- 
capable aircraft, command and control networks, nu-
clear-related facilities, and conventional capabilities; 
(9) to deter large-scale, catastrophic war with 
Russia, the People’s Republic of China, and other 
potential adversaries, as well as reassure allies, the 
United 
States 
requires 
reliable, 
diverse, 
and 
tailorable nuclear forces that are able to respond to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01174
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1175 
HR 5515 PCS
a variety of current threats while preparing for fu-
ture uncertainty; 
(10) the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review recon-
firms the value of the nuclear triad and dual-capable 
aircraft of the United States, directs the continu-
ation of the comprehensive nuclear modernization 
program initiated by the previous administration, 
and proposes two supplemental capabilities (a lower- 
yield submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead 
and a sea-launched cruise missile) that will strength-
en deterrence and assurance and reduce the chances 
that nuclear weapons are used in conflict; 
(11) three successive Secretaries of Defense 
across two administrations have stated that nuclear 
deterrence is the highest priority mission of the De-
partment of Defense; and 
(12) in light of this prioritization, the age of 
the current nuclear forces and infrastructure of the 
United States, and the small percentage of the de-
fense budget that will be expended on the recapital-
ization of the nuclear deterrent of the United States, 
the modernization of the nuclear forces, command 
and control systems, and supporting infrastructure 
of the United States is affordable and a national im-
perative. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01175
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1176 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 1650. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON EXTENDED NUCLEAR 
DETERRENCE IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the nuclear program of the Democratic Peo-
ple’s Republic of Korea poses a critical national se-
curity threat not only to the United States, but to 
the security and stability of the entire Indo-Pacific 
region, including South Korea, Japan, and Aus-
tralia; 
(2) the nuclear and conventional forces of the 
United States continue to play a fundamental role in 
deterring aggression against its interests and the in-
terests of its allies in the Indo-Pacific region and be-
yond; 
(3) the United States stands unwaveringly be-
hind its treaty obligations and assurances, including 
those related to defense and extended nuclear deter-
rence, to South Korea, Japan, and Australia; 
(4) the complete, verifiable, and irreversible 
denuclearization of the Democratic People’s Republic 
of Korea remains a central foreign policy objective 
of the United States; 
(5) the status of any denuclearization or end-of- 
conflict agreement with the Democratic People’s Re-
public of Korea should not supersede such treaty ob-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01176
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1177 
HR 5515 PCS
ligations and assurances described in paragraph (3); 
and 
(6) the presence of United States Forces on the 
Korean Peninsula should remain strong and endur-
ing. 
Subtitle E—Missile Defense 
Programs 
SEC. 1661. DEVELOPMENT OF PERSISTENT SPACE-BASED 
SENSOR ARCHITECTURE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Absent a missile defense review, the budget 
of the President submitted to Congress under sec-
tion 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fis-
cal year 2019 did not propose funding for efforts 
within the Missile Defense Agency to further develop 
the Missile Defense Tracking System (a future space 
sensor architecture) and instead funds were provided 
to the Air Force to determine the plan of the De-
partment of Defense for future missile warning and 
tracking capabilities. 
(2) Delaying development and deployment of a 
space-based missile tracking capability further places 
the United States at a disadvantage against 
hypersonic threats. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01177
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1178 
HR 5515 PCS
(b) DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED.—Subsection (a) of 
section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131. Stat. 
1777) is amended by striking ‘‘If consistent with the direc-
tion or recommendations of the Ballistic Missile Defense 
Review that commenced in 2017, the Director of the Mis-
sile Defense Agency’’ and inserting ‘‘Beginning fiscal year 
2019, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in co-
ordination with the Director of National Intelligence, the 
Commander of the Air Force Space Command, and the 
Commander of the United States Strategic Command,’’. 
(c) PLAN.— 
(1) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to 
be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made avail-
able for fiscal year 2019 for the Department of De-
fense for the development of the space-based sensor 
architecture under subsection (a) of section 1683 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1777), 
not more than 25 percent may be obligated or ex-
pended until the date on which the Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency submits the plan under sub-
section (e) of such section. 
(2) 
CLARIFICATION
OF
ROLES.—Section 
1683(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01178
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1179 
HR 5515 PCS
for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1777) is amended by striking ‘‘the Director shall 
submit’’ and inserting ‘‘the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency, in coordination with the Director of 
National Intelligence, the Commander of the Air 
Force Space Command, and the Commander of the 
United States Strategic Command shall submit’’. 
(d) REPORT ON USE OF OTHER AUTHORITIES.— 
Such section 1683 is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub-
section (g); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol-
lowing new subsection (f): 
‘‘(f) REPORT ON USE OF OTHER AUTHORITIES.— 
Not later than January 31, 2019, the Director of the Mis-
sile Defense Agency shall submit to the appropriate con-
gressional committees a report on the options available to 
the Director to use other transactional authorities pursu-
ant to section 2371 of title 10, United States Code, to 
accelerate the development and deployment of the sensor 
architecture required by subsection (a).’’. 
SEC. 1662. BOOST PHASE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY.—Section 1685 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01179
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1180 
HR 5515 PCS
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
sections: 
‘‘(d) DEVELOPMENT.— 
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—Beginning fiscal year 
2019, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 
shall carry out a program to develop boost phase 
intercept capabilities that— 
‘‘(A) are cost effective; 
‘‘(B) are air-launched, ship-based, or both; 
and 
‘‘(C) include kinetic interceptors. 
‘‘(2) PARTNERSHIPS.—In developing kinetic 
boost phase intercept capabilities under paragraph 
(1), the Director may enter into partnerships with 
the Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of 
Korea or the Ministry of Defense of Japan, or both. 
‘‘(e) INDEPENDENT STUDY.— 
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of De-
fense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a 
federally funded research and development center to 
conduct a feasibility study on providing an initial or 
demonstrated boost phase capability using un-
manned aerial vehicles and kinetic interceptors by 
December 31, 2021. Such study shall include, at a 
minimum, a review of the study published by the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01180
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1181 
HR 5515 PCS
Science, Technology, and National Security Working 
Group of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
in 2017 titled ‘Airborne Patrol to Destroy DPRK 
ICBMs in Powered Flight’. 
‘‘(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than July 31, 
2019, the Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees the study conducted under 
paragraph (1).’’. 
(b) DIRECTED ENERGY DEVELOPMENT.—Subsection 
(b) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(2) ROLE OF DIRECTOR.— 
‘‘(A) TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY.—Be-
ginning fiscal year 2019, the Secretary shall 
transfer from the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Research and Engineering to the Director 
of the Missile Defense Agency the responsibility 
to continue developing the interim directed en-
ergy boost phase ballistic missile defense capa-
bility specified in paragraph (1). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01181
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1182 
HR 5515 PCS
‘‘(B) OTHER
PROGRAMS.—In continuing 
the development under subparagraph (A), the 
Director shall— 
‘‘(i) leverage the efforts of the Under 
Secretary under the high energy laser ad-
vanced development program; and 
‘‘(ii) share with the Under Secretary 
any information useful to such program. 
‘‘(C) BRIEFING.—Not later than February 
28, 2019, the Director shall provide to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate, and to any 
other congressional defense committee upon re-
quest, a briefing on— 
‘‘(i) specific criteria that the Director 
will address in the development under sub-
paragraph (A); and 
‘‘(ii) parameters used to measure 
progress in such development.’’. 
(c) MODIFICATION TO SENSE OF CONGRESS.—Sub-
section (a) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘, if 
consistent with the direction or recommendations of the 
Ballistic Missile Defense Review that commenced in 
2017’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01182
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1183 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 1663. IMPROVEMENTS TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOP-
MENT AND ACQUISITION PROCESSES OF MIS-
SILE DEFENSE AGENCY. 
(a) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.— 
(1) TRANSFER.—Not later than September 30, 
2020, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer the au-
thority and the total obligational authority for each 
research and development program described in 
paragraph (2) from the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Research and Engineering to the Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency. 
(2) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 
DESCRIBED.—A research and development program 
described in this paragraph is a program that the 
Under Secretary identifies as meeting each of the 
following criteria: 
(A) The program consists of efforts to de-
velop prototypes or science and technology, or 
has not yet received Milestone B approval (as 
defined in section 2366 of title 10, United 
States Code). 
(B) The efforts of the program either— 
(i) are planned to be incorporated into 
ballistic missile defense systems; or 
(ii) have explicit applications for bal-
listic missile defense or hypersonic defense. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01183
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1184 
HR 5515 PCS
(3) REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2019, 
the Under Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report that— 
(A) lists each research and development 
program identified under paragraph (2); and 
(B) a summary of the efforts and funding 
required for such programs during the period 
covered by the future-years defense program 
under section 221 of title 10, United States 
Code, as of the date of the report. 
(b) NOTIFICATION ON CHANGES TO NON-STANDARD 
ACQUISITION PROCESSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.— 
(1) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized 
to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 
available for fiscal year 2019 for the Secretary of 
Defense may be obligated or expended to change the 
non-standard acquisition processes and responsibil-
ities described in paragraph (2) until— 
(A) the Secretary notifies the congressional 
defense committees of such proposed change; 
and 
(B) a period of 180 days has elapsed fol-
lowing the date of such notification. 
(2) NON-STANDARD
ACQUISITION
PROCESSES 
AND
RESPONSIBILITIES
DESCRIBED.—The 
non- 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01184
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1185 
HR 5515 PCS
standard acquisition processes and responsibilities 
described in this paragraph are such processes and 
responsibilities described in— 
(A) the memorandum of the Secretary of 
Defense titled ‘‘Missile Defense Program Direc-
tion’’ signed on January 2, 2002; 
(B) Department of Defense Directive 
5134.09, as in effect on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act; and 
(C) United States Strategic Command In-
struction 583–3. 
(c) INTEGRATED MASTER TEST PLAN INFORMA-
TION.— 
(1) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—Together with the 
release of each integrated master test plan of the 
Missile Defense Agency, the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency shall make publicly available a 
version of each such plan that identifies the fiscal 
year and the fiscal quarter in which events under the 
plan will occur. 
(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 30 days after 
the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 
2020 and 2021 is submitted to Congress under sec-
tion 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Direc-
tor shall submit to the congressional defense com-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01185
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1186 
HR 5515 PCS
mittees the integrated master test plan of the Mis-
sile Defense Agency, including any classified and un-
classified versions of such plan. 
(d) MISSILE DEFENSE EXECUTIVE BOARD.—In ad-
dition to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering serving as chairman of the Missile Defense 
Executive Board pursuant to section 1676(c)(3)(B) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 
(Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1773), the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall 
serve— 
(1) as a member of the Board; and 
(2) as co-chairman with respect to decisions re-
garding acquisition and the approval of acquisition 
and production milestones, including with respect to 
the use of other transaction authority contracts and 
transactions in excess of $500,000,000 (including all 
options). 
SEC. 1664. LAYERED DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES 
HOMELAND. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The United States homeland (including Ha-
waii and Alaska) is currently protected against inter-
continental ballistic missiles by the ground-based 
midcourse defense system, with 44 ground-based 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01186
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1187 
HR 5515 PCS
interceptors located at Fort Greely, Alaska, and 
Vandenberg, California. 
(2) The Department of Defense plans to expand 
the number of ground-based interceptors to 64 inter-
ceptors by 2023 by adding Missile Field 4 at Fort 
Greely, Alaska. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the United States should— 
(1) continue to explore and deploy capabilities 
that increase the layered defense of the United 
States homeland; 
(2) support, if determined by the Secretary of 
Defense as necessary for the national security of the 
United States, the deployment of a ground-based in-
terceptor site, or potential other ballistic missile de-
fense systems pending successful testing, on the 
East Coast of the United States that— 
(A) 
weighs 
cost 
effectiveness 
and 
prioritization of capability; and 
(B) provides for increased protection of the 
continental United States from North Korean 
and Iranian threats; 
(3) support the ability of the Army, the Navy, 
and the Missile Defense Agency to deploy fixed, 
semi-fixed, and mobile at-sea and ashore assets to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01187
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1188 
HR 5515 PCS
locations to increase the layered defense of all of the 
United States homeland; and 
(4) support, as appropriate, further analysis 
and testing for regional systems to be employed for 
the layered defense of the United States homeland. 
(c) CERTIFICATION.—Before the Secretary of De-
fense makes a potential determination to deploy regional 
assets to provide missile defense from longer range 
threats, the Secretary shall certify to the congressional de-
fense committees that such deployment would not unnec-
essarily undermine or pose additional risk to strategic sta-
bility. 
(d) BRIEFING.—Not later than January 31, 2019, 
the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordina-
tion with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the 
Commander of the United States Northern Command, 
and the Commander of the United States Pacific Com-
mand, shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and to 
any other congressional defense committee upon request, 
a briefing that— 
(1) describes options and plans to increase or 
improve the layered protection of the United States 
homeland (including Hawaii and Alaska) from 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01188
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1189 
HR 5515 PCS
threats posed by North Korea and threats posed by 
Iran; 
(2) addresses the capabilities and reliability of 
missile defense systems to defend against potential 
trajectories of missiles from both the North and 
South Poles; and 
(3) addresses technical capability and policy 
with respect to such options. 
SEC. 1665. TESTING OF REDESIGNED KILL VEHICLE PRIOR 
TO PRODUCTION. 
(a) SUCCESSFUL TESTING REQUIRED.—Except as 
provided by subsection (b), the Director of the Missile De-
fense Agency may not make a lot production decision for 
the redesigned kill vehicle unless the vehicle has undergone 
at least one successful flight intercept test that meets the 
following criteria: 
(1) The test sufficiently assesses the perform-
ance of the vehicle in order to inform a lot produc-
tion decision. 
(2) The results of the test demonstrate that the 
vehicle— 
(A) will work in an effective manner; and 
(B) has the ability to accomplish the in-
tended mission of the vehicle. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01189
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1190 
HR 5515 PCS
(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense, without del-
egation, may waive subsection (a) if— 
(1) the Secretary determines that the waiver is 
in the interest of national security; 
(2) the Secretary determines that the threat of 
missiles is advancing at a pace that requires addi-
tional capacity of the ground-based midcourse sys-
tem by 2023; 
(3) the Secretary determines that the waiver is 
appropriate in light of the assessment conducted by 
the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation 
under subsection (c); 
(4) the Secretary submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report containing— 
(A) a notice of the waiver, including the 
rationale of the Secretary for making the waiv-
er; 
(B) a certification by the Secretary that 
the Secretary has analyzed and accepts the risk 
of making and implementing a lot production 
decision for the redesigned kill vehicle prior to 
the vehicle undergoing a successful flight inter-
cept test; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01190
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1191 
HR 5515 PCS
(C) the assessment of the Director of 
Operational Test and Evaluation under sub-
section (c); and 
(5) a period of 30 days elapses following the 
date on which the Secretary submits the report 
under paragraph (4). 
(c) ASSESSMENT ON RISKS.—The Director of Oper-
ational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the Secretary 
of Defense an assessment on the risks of making a lot 
production decision for the redesigned kill vehicle prior to 
the vehicle undergoing a successful flight intercept test. 
SEC. 1666. REQUIREMENTS FOR BALLISTIC MISSILE DE-
FENSE CAPABLE SHIPS. 
(a) FORCE STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT.—The Sec-
retary of the Navy, in consultation with the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency, shall include in the first force 
structure assessment conducted following the date of the 
enactment of this Act the following: 
(1) An assessment of the requirements for bal-
listic missile defense capable ships. 
(2) The force structure requirements associated 
with advanced ballistic missile defense capabilities. 
(b) FORCE STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT DEFINED.— 
The term ‘‘force structure assessment’’ has the meaning 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01191
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1192 
HR 5515 PCS
given the term in Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 
3050.27. 
SEC. 1667. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR 
STANDARD MISSILE–3 BLOCK IB MISSILES. 
(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.— 
Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, 
the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into 
one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 2019 
program year, for the procurement of standard missile– 
3 block IB missiles. 
(b) CONDITION
FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAY-
MENTS.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) 
shall provide that any obligation of the United States to 
make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after 
fiscal year 2019 is subject to the availability of appropria-
tions or funds for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 
SEC. 1668. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
ARMY LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DE-
FENSE SENSOR. 
(a) LIMITATION.—If the Secretary of the Army issues 
an acquisition strategy for a 360-degree lower tier air and 
missile defense sensor pursuant to section 1679(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 
(Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1774) that proposes such 
sensor achieve initial operating capability later than De-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01192
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1193 
HR 5515 PCS
cember 31, 2023, not more than 50 percent of the funds 
authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 
made available for fiscal year 2019 for such sensor may 
be obligated or expended until the date on which the Sec-
retary submits to the congressional defense committees a 
report— 
(1) explaining the rationale of such delayed ini-
tial operating capability, including a description of 
any technological or acquisition-related factors caus-
ing such delay; and 
(2) containing a funding profile and schedule to 
ensure that such sensor would achieve initial oper-
ating capability by December 31, 2023. 
(b) PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION.—The Secretary 
shall ensure that the performance specification of the 360- 
degree lower tier air and missile defense sensor— 
(1) specifies requirements relating to— 
(A) detecting and tracking complex attacks 
from air breathing threats, tactical ballistic mis-
siles, and emerging hypersonic weapons; and 
(B) being a key component of the future 
integrated air and missile defense architecture 
of the Army and supporting engagements for 
the full range and capability of Patriot Ad-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01193
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1194 
HR 5515 PCS
vanced Capability–3 missile segment enhance-
ment interceptors; and 
(2) uses evaluation criteria that enables an un-
derstanding of the cost and value of procuring such 
sensor in accordance with such specified require-
ments. 
SEC. 1669. MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR IN HAWAII. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Secretary of Defense, acting through the 
Director of the Missile Defense Agency, and in coordina-
tion with relevant Federal and local entities, should— 
(1) ensure an on-time or improved delivery 
schedule of the discrimination radar for homeland 
defense to be made operational in Hawaii; and 
(2) accelerate the deployment of the radar as 
much as possible, contingent on the environmental 
review process pursuant to the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
(b) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 45 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency shall certify to the congressional 
defense committees that— 
(1) the Director is on schedule to award the 
contract for the discrimination radar for homeland 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01194
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1195 
HR 5515 PCS
defense planned to be located in Hawaii by Decem-
ber 31, 2018; and 
(2) such radar and associated in-flight inter-
ceptor communications system data terminal will be 
operational by not later than September 30, 2023. 
(c) BRIEFINGS.— 
(1) DELAYED SCHEDULE.—If the Director is 
unable to certify under subsection (b) that the Di-
rector is on schedule to award the contract for the 
discrimination radar for homeland defense planned 
to be located in Hawaii by December 31, 2018, not 
later than 45 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, and on a biweekly basis thereafter until 
the date of the award, the Director shall provide to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate, and to any other 
congressional defense committee upon request, a 
briefing explaining— 
(A) the rationale for the delay in such 
schedule; and 
(B) any effects of such delay in making 
such radar and associated in-flight interceptor 
communications system data terminal oper-
ational by not later than September 30, 2023. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01195
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1196 
HR 5515 PCS
(2) SEMIANNUAL.—Not later than 45 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and 
semiannually thereafter through 2021, the Director 
shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and 
to any other congressional defense committee upon 
request, a briefing on— 
(A) the acquisition of the discrimination 
radar for homeland defense planned to be lo-
cated in Hawaii and the associated in-flight in-
terceptor communications system data terminal; 
and 
(B) the environmental review process for 
such radar pursuant to the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.). 
SEC. 1670. REPORTS ON UNFUNDED PRIORITIES OF THE 
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY. 
(a) REPORTS.—Not later than 10 days after the date 
on which the budget of the President for each of fiscal 
years 2020 and 2021 is submitted to Congress pursuant 
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Direc-
tor of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
of Staff, and to the congressional defense committees, a 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01196
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1197 
HR 5515 PCS
report on the unfunded priorities of the Missile Defense 
Agency. 
(b) ELEMENTS.— 
(1) MATTERS INCLUDED.—Each report under 
subsection (a) shall specify, for each unfunded pri-
ority covered by such report, the following: 
(A) A summary description of such pri-
ority, including the objectives to be achieved if 
such priority is funded (whether in whole or in 
part). 
(B) The additional amount of funds rec-
ommended in connection with the objectives 
under subparagraph (A). 
(C) Account information with respect to 
such priority, including, as applicable— 
(i) the line item number for applicable 
procurement accounts; 
(ii) the program element number for 
applicable research, development, test, and 
evaluation accounts; and 
(iii) the sub-activity group for applica-
ble operation and maintenance accounts. 
(2) PRIORITIZATION OF PRIORITIES.—Each re-
port under subsection (a) shall present the unfunded 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01197
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1198 
HR 5515 PCS
priorities covered by such report in order of urgency 
of priority. 
(c) UNFUNDED PRIORITY DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘unfunded priority’’, in the case of a fiscal year, 
means a program, activity, or mission requirement of the 
Missile Defense Agency that— 
(1) is not funded in the budget of the President 
for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursu-
ant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code; 
(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associ-
ated with an operational or contingency plan of a 
combatant command or other validated requirement; 
and 
(3) would have been recommended for funding 
through the budget referred to in paragraph (1) by 
the Director of the Missile Defense Agency in con-
nection with the budget if— 
(A) additional resources had been available 
for the budget to fund the program, activity, or 
mission requirement; or 
(B) the program, activity, or mission re-
quirement has emerged since the budget was 
formulated. 
SEC. 1671. REPORT ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01198
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1199 
HR 5515 PCS
(1) The Secretary of Defense is conducting a 
ballistic missile defense review that will assess the 
capabilities and requirements for homeland, regional, 
and theater missile defense. 
(2) This review will have significant implica-
tions for national security and potentially on re-
source prioritization and requirements. 
(3) The review was initially expected to have 
been completed by January but has been delayed 
several months due to revisions and has not yet been 
submitted to Congress. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on ballistic missile defense that addresses the implica-
tions for planned programs of record, costs and resource 
prioritization, and strategic stability. 
(c) CBO REPORT ON COSTS RELATING TO BAL-
LISTIC, CRUISE, AND HYPERSONIC DEFENSES OF THE 
UNITED STATES.— 
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting 
forth the following: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01199
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1200 
HR 5515 PCS
(A) An estimate of the costs over the 10- 
year period beginning on the date of the report 
associated with— 
(i) fielding and maintaining the cur-
rent and planned ballistic, cruise, and 
hypersonic defenses of the United States; 
and 
(ii) 
implementing 
any 
new 
rec-
ommendations of the Ballistic Missile De-
fense Review with regard to ballistic, 
cruise, and hypersonic defenses. 
(B) An estimate of the costs to design, 
launch, maintain, and operate space-based sen-
sors of different constellation sizes ranging 
from limited to comprehensive. 
(2) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex. 
SEC. 1672. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE AND ROCKET 
DEFENSE 
COOPERATION 
BETWEEN 
THE 
UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The United States and Israel signed a 
Memorandum of Understanding on September 14, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01200
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1201 
HR 5515 PCS
2016, that covers the 10-year period beginning with 
fiscal year 2019. 
(2) The Memorandum of Understanding states 
that the United States will provide annual funding 
of $500,000,000 for cooperative programs to de-
velop, produce, and procure missile, rocket, and pro-
jectile defense capabilities to help Israel meet its se-
curity needs and to help develop and enhance the 
missile defense capabilities of the United States. 
(3) The Memorandum of Understanding further 
states that Israel may seek additional missile de-
fense funding from the United States in exceptional 
circumstances, as may be jointly agreed by the 
United States and Israel. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) the strong and enduring relationship be-
tween the United States and Israel is in the national 
security interest of both countries; and 
(2) the September 2016 Memorandum of Un-
derstanding between the United States and Israel, 
including the provisions of the memorandum relating 
to missile and rocket defense cooperation, is a crit-
ical component of the bilateral relationship. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01201
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1202 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 1673. REPORT ON COUNTERMEASURES TEST PRO-
GRAM. 
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report on the status of the countermeasures test 
program. The report shall include an evaluation and re-
sponse to the 2010 report by the JASON Defense Advi-
sory Panel titled ‘‘MDA Discrimination’’, numbered JSR- 
10.620, with regard to the recommendations of that report 
on forming a countermeasures test program through an 
independent agency to— 
(1) challenge the countermeasure efforts of the 
Missile Defense Agency; 
(2) design countermeasures for the Missile De-
fense Agency; 
(3) simulate such countermeasures against the 
national missile defense; and 
(4) as appropriate, in cooperation with the Di-
rector, build and test countermeasures in intercept 
flight tests. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01202
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1203 
HR 5515 PCS
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 1681. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION TO ASSESS THE 
THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES FROM ELEC-
TROMAGNETIC PULSE ATTACKS AND SIMI-
LAR EVENTS. 
Section 1691 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1786) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (e)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘April 
1, 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘December 1, 2019’’; 
and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘October 
1, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1, 2019’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘October 1, 
2019’’ and inserting ‘‘the date that is 180 days after 
the date on which the Commission submits the re-
port under subsection (e)(1)’’. 
SEC. 1682. PROCUREMENT OF AMMONIUM PERCHLORATE 
AND OTHER CHEMICALS FOR USE IN SOLID 
ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.— 
(1) GOVERNMENT-OWNED, CONTRACTOR OPER-
ATED.—The Secretary of the Army and the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01203
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1204 
HR 5515 PCS
and Industrial Base Policy shall jointly conduct a 
business case analysis of the Federal Government 
using 
a 
Government-owned, 
contractor-operated 
model to ensure a robust domestic industrial base to 
supply specialty chemicals, including ammonium per-
chlorate, for use in solid rocket motors. Such anal-
ysis shall include assessments of the near- and long- 
term costs, operating and sustainment costs, pro-
gram impacts, opportunities for competition, oppor-
tunities for redundant or complementary capabili-
ties, and national security implications of using such 
a model. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2019, 
the Secretary and the Deputy Assistant Secretary 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
the business case analysis conducted under para-
graph (1). 
(b) FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.— 
(1) USE.—To the extent practicable, in award-
ing a contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate 
from retired solid rocket motors, the Secretary of 
Defense shall use full and open competition (as de-
fined in section 107 of title 41, United States Code). 
(2) NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary awards a 
contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate from 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01204
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1205 
HR 5515 PCS
retired solid rocket motors using procedures that do 
not include full and open competition, the Secretary 
shall notify the congressional defense committees of 
such award not later than 30 days after the date of 
such award. 
SEC. 
1683. 
CONVENTIONAL 
PROMPT 
GLOBAL 
STRIKE 
HYPERSONIC CAPABILITIES. 
(a) VALIDATED REQUIREMENTS.—Not later than 
November 30, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a validated re-
quirement for ground-, sea-, or air-launched (or a com-
bination thereof) conventional prompt global strike 
hypersonic capabilities. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2019, the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretary of the 
Navy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
that contains the following: 
(1) A plan to deliver a conventional prompt 
global strike weapon system that— 
(A) is in accordance with section 1693 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1791); and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01205
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1206 
HR 5515 PCS
(B) includes— 
(i) options with cost estimates for ac-
celerating the initial capability for such 
system; and 
(ii) a description of policy decisions by 
the Secretary of Defense that are nec-
essary to employ hypersonic offense capa-
bilities from each potential launch platform 
of such system. 
(2) Details with respect to the assessed level of 
ambiguity and misinterpretation risk relating to the 
conventional prompt global strike weapon system, in-
cluding such potential risks associated with warhead 
ambiguity, platform ambiguity (including if adver-
sary sensors are degraded), perceptions of the sur-
vivability of strategic nuclear forces, and likely ad-
versary responses. 
(3) A description of whether, when, and how 
the Under Secretary would address the risks identi-
fied under paragraph (2) in developing and deploy-
ing the conventional prompt global strike weapon 
system and in developing the concept of operations 
for such system. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01206
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1207 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 1684. REPORT REGARDING INDUSTRIAL BASE FOR 
LARGE SOLID ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) REPORT.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than April 15, 
2019, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion and Sustainment, in consultation with the Sec-
retaries of the military departments that the Under 
Secretary determines appropriate, shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees a report 
on whether, and if so, how, the Federal Government 
will sustain more than one supplier for large solid 
rocket motors. 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The report under 
paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the fol-
lowing: 
(A) The risks within the industrial base for 
large solid rocket motors, including the risks to 
national security. 
(B) The near- and long-term costs associ-
ated with having a single source of large solid 
rocket motors as compared to having more than 
one such source. 
(C) Options for sustaining more than one 
supplier for large solid rocket motors, including 
through leveraging— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01207
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1208 
HR 5515 PCS
(i) the ground-based strategic deter-
rent program; 
(ii) the Trident II D5 fleet ballistic 
missile program; 
(iii) the ground-based midcourse de-
fense program; 
(iv) national security space launch 
programs; 
(v) programs of the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration; and 
(vi) any other applicable programs 
that use or may use solid rocket motors of 
any size, including with respect to substra-
tegic and tactical systems. 
(b) BRIEFING.—Not later than November 30, 2018, 
the Under Secretary shall provide to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Senate, and to any other appropriate congressional com-
mittee upon request, a briefing on the industrial base for 
large solid rocket motors. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means the following: 
(1) The congressional defense committees. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01208
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1209 
HR 5515 PCS
(2) The Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology and the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 
(3) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation and the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 1685. NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE WITH RE-
SPECT TO RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTER-
FERENCE IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES. 
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence 
shall commission and produce a National Intelligence Esti-
mate, which may be submitted in classified form with an 
unclassified summary, on Russian and Chinese inter-
ference in democratic countries around the world, includ-
ing the United States, that contains specific descriptions 
of such interference. Not later than 60 days after the sub-
mission of the National Intelligence Estimate required 
under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall report 
to Congress on efforts of the Department of Defense to 
deter such interference. Such report shall describe and as-
sess any actions taken by the Department, including co-
operation with other Federal agencies and other countries 
to deter such interference. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01209
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1210 
HR 5515 PCS
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER FIVE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title 
XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, 
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2024. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
authorizations for military construction projects, land ac-
quisition, family housing projects and facilities, and con-
tributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01210
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1211 
HR 5515 PCS
curity Investment Program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2024 for military con-
struction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2018; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Army may acquire real property and carry out military 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01211
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1212 
HR 5515 PCS
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama .........................
Anniston Army Depot ...........................................
$5,200,000 
California .......................
Fort Irwin ..............................................................
$29,000,000 
Colorado .........................
Fort Carson ...........................................................
$77,000,000 
Georgia ...........................
Fort Gordon ..........................................................
$99,000,000 
Indiana ...........................
Crane Army Ammunition Plant ............................
$16,000,000 
Kentucky ........................
Fort Campbell .......................................................
$50,000,000 
Fort Knox ..............................................................
$26,000,000 
Maryland ........................
Fort Meade ............................................................
$16,500,000 
New Jersey .....................
Picatinny Arsenal ..................................................
$41,000,000 
New Mexico ....................
White Sands Missile Range ...................................
$40,000,000 
New York .......................
U.S. Military Academy ..........................................
$160,000,000 
North Carolina ...............
Fort Bragg ............................................................
$10,000,000 
South Carolina ...............
Fort Jackson .........................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..............................
Fort Bliss ..............................................................
$24,000,000 
Fort Hood ..............................................................
$9,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Army may acquire real property and carry out the military 
construction project for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amount, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany ........................
East Camp Grafenwoehr ........................................
$31,000,000 
Honduras ........................
Soto Cano Air Base ................................................
$21,000,000 
Korea ...............................
Camp Tango ...........................................................
$17,500,000 
Kuwait .............................
Camp Arifjan ..........................................................
$44,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01212
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1213 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 7601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Italy .........................
Vicenza ....................
Family Housing New 
Construction ........
$95,134,000 
Korea .......................
Camp Walker ...........
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction ...............
$68,000,000 
Puerto Rico ..............
Fort Buchanan ........
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction ...............
$26,000,000 
Wisconsin .................
Fort McCoy .............
Family Housing New 
Construction ........
$6,200,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 7601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $18,326,000. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01213
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1214 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2018, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601. 
SEC. 2104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 
3669), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 
Stat. 3670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2020, whichever 
is later. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01214
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1215 
HR 5515 PCS
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation 
Project 
Amount 
California .................
Military Ocean Ter-
minal, Concord.
Access Control Point 
$9,900,000 
Japan .......................
Kadena Air Base .....
Missile Magazine .....
$10,600,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ......................
Camp Navajo ................................................
$14,800,000 
California ...................
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton ...........
$127,930,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar .............
$31,980,000 
Naval Air Station Lemoore ..........................
$127,590,000 
Naval Base Coronado ...................................
$156,580,000 
Naval Base San Diego .................................
$176,040,000 
Naval Base Ventura .....................................
$53,160,000 
Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach .............
$139,630,000 
District of Columbia ..
Naval Observatory ........................................
$115,600,000 
Florida .......................
Naval Air Station Whiting Field .................
$10,000,000 
Naval Station Mayport ................................
$111,460,000 
Georgia ......................
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany ...........
$31,900,000 
Guam .........................
Joint Region Marianas .................................
$355,257,000 
Hawaii .......................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ................
$123,320,000 
Marine Corps Base Hawaii ..........................
$66,100,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01215
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1216 
HR 5515 PCS
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Maine .........................
Portsmouth Naval Yard ...............................
$149,685,000 
Mississippi .................
Naval Construction Battalion Center ..........
$22,300,000 
North Carolina ..........
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune ..............
$51,300,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point ......
$240,830,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Naval Support Activity Philadelphia ...........
$71,050,000 
South Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort .............
$15,817,000 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island 
$35,190,000 
Utah ...........................
Hill Air Force Base .....................................
$105,520,000 
Virginia ......................
Marine Corps Base Quantico .......................
$13,100,000 
Norfolk Naval Shipyard ...............................
$26,120,000 
Washington ................
Naval Base Kitsap .......................................
$88,960,000 
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island ...............
$27,380,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahamas ....................
Andros Island ...............................................
$31,050,000 
Bahrain ....................
SW Asia .......................................................
$26,340,000 
Cuba ..........................
Naval Station Guantanamo Bay ..................
$104,700,000 
Germany ....................
Panzer Kaserne ............................................
$43,950,000 
Japan .........................
Kadena Air Base ..........................................
$9,049,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01216
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1217 
HR 5515 PCS
in section 7601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Guam .......................
Joint Region Mari-
anas ......................
Replace Andersen 
Housing PH III ...
$83,441,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 7601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,502,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and 
available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may improve existing military family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $16,638,000. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01217
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1218 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2018, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the installations or locations 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01218
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1219 
HR 5515 PCS
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ....................................
Eielson Air Force Base ..............
$63,800,000 
Arizona ..................................
Davis Monthan Air Force Base
$15,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .................
$40,000,000 
Arkansas ................................
Little Rock Air Force Base .......
$26,000,000 
Florida ...................................
Eglin Air Force Base .................
$62,863,000 
MacDill Air Force Base .............
$3,100,000 
Patrick Air Force Base ..............
$9,000,000 
Guam .....................................
Joint Region Marianas ...............
$9,800,000 
Louisiana ...............................
Barksdale Air Force Base ..........
$12,250,000 
Mariana Islands .....................
Tinian .........................................
$50,700,000 
Maryland ...............................
Joint Base Andrews ...................
$58,000,000 
Massachusetts ........................
Hanscom Air Force Base ...........
$225,000,000 
Nebraska ...............................
Offutt Air Force Base ................
$9,500,000 
Nevada ...................................
Creech Air Force Base ...............
$59,000,000 
Nellis Air Force Base .................
$5,900,000 
New Mexico ...........................
Holloman Air Force Base ..........
$85,000,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ............
$7,000,000 
New York ...............................
Rome Lab ...................................
$14,200,000 
North Dakota ........................
Minot Air Force Base ................
$66,000,000 
Ohio .......................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force 
Base.
$182,000,000 
Oklahoma ...............................
Altus Air Force Base .................
$12,000,000 
Tinker Air Force Base ...............
$166,000,000 
South Carolina ......................
Shaw Air Force Base .................
$53,000,000 
Utah .......................................
Hill Air Force Base ...................
$26,000,000 
Washington ............................
Fairchild-White Bluff .................
$14,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the installation or location 
outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
United Kingdom .......................
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ..
$148,467,000 
Worldwide Classified ................
Classified Location ..................
$18,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01219
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1220 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may carry out architectural and engineering serv-
ices and construction design activities with respect to the 
construction or improvement of family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and 
available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $75,247,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2018, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01220
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1221 
HR 5515 PCS
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN PHASED PROJECT AUTHORIZED IN 
FISCAL YEARS 2015, 2016, AND 2017. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 
113-291; 128 Stat. 3679) for Royal Air Force Croughton 
for JIAC Consolidation Phase 1, the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division 
B of Public Law 114-92; 129 Stat. 1153) for Croughton 
Royal Air Force for JIAC Consolidation Phase 2, and the 
authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114-328; 130 Stat. 
2697) for Royal Air Force Croughton for JIAC Consolida-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01221
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1222 
HR 5515 PCS
tion Phase 3, the location shall be United Kingdom, Un-
specified. 
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 
114-328; 130 Stat. 2696) for Joint Base San Antonio, 
Texas, for construction of a basic military training recruit 
dormitory, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 
a 26,537 square meter dormitory in the amount of 
$92,300,000. 
SEC. 2307. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 
115-91; 131 Stat. 1825) for the United States Air Force 
Academy, Colorado, for construction of a cyberworks facil-
ity, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a facility 
of up to 4,000 square meters. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01222
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1223 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2308. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Secretary of 
the Air Force may carry out military construction projects 
to construct— 
(1) a 6,702 square meter Joint Simulation En-
vironment Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia, in the amount of $43,000,000; 
(2) a 4,833 square meter Cyberspace Test Fa-
cility at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in the 
amount of $38,000,000; and 
(3) a 4,735 square meter Joint Simulation En-
vironment Facility at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 
in the amount of $30,000,000. 
(b) USE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 
EVALUATION FUNDS.—As provided for in the Defense 
Laboratory Modernization Pilot Program authorized by 
section 2803 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), the Sec-
retary may use funds available for research, development, 
test, and evaluation for the projects described in sub-
section (a). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01223
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1224 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 
2309. 
ADDITIONAL 
AUTHORITY 
TO 
CARRY 
OUT 
PROJECT AT TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, CALI-
FORNIA, IN FISCAL YEAR 2019. 
The Secretary of the Air Force may carry out a mili-
tary construction project to construct a 150,000 square 
foot high-bay air cargo pallet storage and marshaling en-
closure integral to installation of a mechanized material 
handling system at Travis Air Force Base, California, in 
the amount of $35,000,000. 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of De-
fense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .........................................
Clear Air Force Station ..........................
$174,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ..........
$14,000,000 
Arkansas ....................................
Little Rock Air Force Base .....................
$14,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01224
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1225 
HR 5515 PCS
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ....................................
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton ......
$12,596,000 
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ..........
$18,800,000 
Naval Base Coronado ..............................
$71,088,000 
Colorado .....................................
Fort Carson .............................................
$24,297,000 
Conus Classified .........................
Classified Location ..................................
$49,222,000 
Kentucky ....................................
Fort Campbell .........................................
$82,298,000 
Maine ..........................................
Kittery .....................................................
$11,600,000 
Maryland ....................................
Fort Meade ..............................................
$805,000,000 
Missouri ......................................
St. Louis ..................................................
$447,800,000 
New Jersey ...............................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ........
$10,200,000 
North Carolina ..........................
Fort Bragg ..............................................
$32,366,000 
Marine Corps Air Station New River ......
$32,580,000 
Oklahoma ...................................
McAlester .................................................
$7,000,000 
Texas ..........................................
Joint Base San Antonio ..........................
$10,200,000 
Red River Army Depot ............................
$71,500,000 
Virginia ......................................
Fort A.P. Hill ..........................................
$11,734,000 
Fort Belvoir .............................................
$6,127,000 
Humphreys Engineer Center ..................
$20,257,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ......................
$12,700,000 
Pentagon .................................................
$35,850,000 
Training Center Dam Neck ....................
$8,959,000 
Washington ................................
Joint Base Lewis-McChord .....................
$26,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of De-
fense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium .........................
Chievres Air Base .................................................
$14,305,000 
Cuba ..............................
Naval Station Guantanamo Bay ..........................
$9,080,000 
Germany ........................
Baumholder ..........................................................
$11,504,000 
Kaiserslautern Air Base .......................................
$99,955,000 
Wiesbaden .............................................................
$56,048,000 
Japan ............................
Camp McTureous .................................................
$94,851,000 
Iwakuni .................................................................
$33,200,000 
Kadena Air Base ..................................................
$21,400,000 
Yokosuka ..............................................................
$170,386,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01225
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1226 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 
2402. 
AUTHORIZED 
ENERGY 
CONSERVATION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available 
for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, in the amount set forth in the 
table. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DE-
FENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2018, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the 
military departments), as specified in the funding table 
in section 7601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01226
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1227 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 
3669), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (128 
Stat. 3681) and as amended by section 2406 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 
(division B of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1831), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2019, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2020, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Japan ..............
Commander Fleet Ac-
tivities Sasebo ...........
E.J. King High 
School Replace-
ment/Renovation ....
$37,681,000 
Japan ..............
Okinawa ........................
Kubasaki High School 
Replacement/Ren-
ovation ...................
$99,420,000 
New Mexico .....
Cannon AFB .................
SOF Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
(STS) .....................
$23,333,000 
Virginia ...........
Pentagon .......................
Redundant Chilled 
Water Loop ............
$15,100,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01227
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1228 
HR 5515 PCS
TITLE XXV—INTERNATIONAL 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization 
Security 
Invest-
ment Program 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of con-
struction previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for con-
tributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 
of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United 
States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization Security Investment Program authorized by 
section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 
7601. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01228
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1229 
HR 5515 PCS
Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind 
Contributions 
SEC. 2511. REPUBLIC OF KOREA FUNDED CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea 
for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of De-
fense may accept military construction projects for the in-
stallations or locations, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects 
Country 
Compo-
nent 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Korea .....
Army ......
Camp Carroll 
Upgrade Electrical Distribu-
tion, Phase 2 ...................
$52,000,000 
Army ......
Camp Hum-
phreys .......
Site Development ................
$7,800,000 
Army ......
Camp Hum-
phreys .......
Air Support Operations 
Squadron .........................
$25,000,000 
Army ......
Camp Hum-
phreys .......
Unaccompanied Enlisted 
Personnel Housing, P2 ...
$76,000,000 
Army ......
Camp Hum-
phreys .......
Echelon Above Brigade En-
gineer Battalion, VMF ....
$123,000,000 
Army ......
Camp Walker 
Repair/Replace Sewer Pip-
ing System ......................
$8,000,000 
Navy ......
Chinhae ........
Indoor Training Pool ..........
$7,400,000 
Navy ......
Pohang Air 
Base ..........
Replace Ordnance Storage 
Magazines ........................
$87,000,000 
Air Force 
Gimhae Air 
Base ..........
Airfield Damage Repair 
Warehouse .......................
$7,600,000 
Air Force 
Gwangju Air 
Base ..........
Airfield Damage Repair 
Warehouse .......................
$7,600,000 
Air Force 
Kunsan Air 
Base ..........
Explosive Ordnance Dis-
posal Facility ...................
$8,000,000 
Air Force 
Kunsan Air 
Base ..........
Upgrade Flow-Through 
Fuel System ....................
$23,000,000 
Air Force 
Osan Air 
Base ..........
5th Reconnaissance Squad-
ron Aircraft Shelter ........
$12,000,000 
Air Force 
Osan Air 
Base ..........
Airfield Damage Repair Fa-
cility ................................
$22,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01229
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1230 
HR 5515 PCS
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects—Continued 
Country 
Compo-
nent 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Air Force 
Osan Air 
Base ..........
Communications HQ Build-
ing ...................................
$45,000,000 
Air Force 
Suwon Air 
Base ..........
Airfield Damage Repair 
Warehouse .......................
$7,200,000 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations 
and Authorization of Appropria-
tions 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alaska ............................
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson .......................
$27,000,000 
Illinois ............................
Marseilles Training Center ...................................
$5,000,000 
Montana ........................
Malta ....................................................................
$15,000,000 
Nevada ..........................
North Las Vegas ..................................................
$32,000,000 
New Hampshire ............
Pembroke ..............................................................
$12,000,000 
North Dakota ................
Fargo ....................................................................
$32,000,000 
Ohio ...............................
Camp Ravenna .....................................................
$7,400,000 
Oklahoma ......................
Lexington .............................................................
$11,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01230
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1231 
HR 5515 PCS
Army National Guard—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
South Dakota ................
Rapid City ............................................................
$15,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army Reserve: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .......................
Fort Irwin ............................................................
$34,000,000 
Washington ...................
Yakima Training Center ......................................
$23,000,000 
Wisconsin ......................
Fort McCoy ..........................................................
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01231
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1232 
HR 5515 PCS
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, 
set forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .......................
Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach .....................
$21,740,000 
Georgia ..........................
Fort Benning ........................................................
$13,630,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Air National Guard locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .......................
Channel Islands Air National Guard Station ......
$8,000,000 
Hawaii ...........................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ........................
$17,000,000 
Illinois ............................
Greater Peoria Regional Airport ..........................
$9,000,000 
Louisiana .......................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orle-
ans.
$39,000,000 
Minnesota ......................
Duluth International Airport ...............................
$8,000,000 
Montana ........................
Great Falls International Airport ........................
$9,000,000 
New York ......................
Francis S. Gabreski Airport .................................
$20,000,000 
Ohio ...............................
Mansfield Lahm Airport ......................................
$13,000,000 
Rickenbacker International Airport .....................
$8,000,000 
Pennsylvania .................
Fort Indiantown Gap ...........................................
$8,000,000 
Virginia .........................
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ...................................
$10,000,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01232
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1233 
HR 5515 PCS
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 7601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Florida ...........................
Patrick Air Force Base ........................................
$24,000,000 
Indiana ..........................
Grissom Air Reserve Base ....................................
$21,500,000 
Massachusetts ...............
Westover Air Reserve Base ..................................
$42,600,000 
Minnesota ......................
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport .........
$9,000,000 
Mississippi .....................
Keesler Air Force Base ........................................
$4,550,000 
New York ......................
Niagara Falls International Airport ....................
$14,000,000 
Ohio ...............................
Youngstown Air Reserve Station .........................
$8,800,000 
Texas .............................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort 
Worth.
$3,100,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for the 
costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, 
and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve 
Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 
1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost 
of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01233
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1234 
HR 5515 PCS
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114– 
92; 129 Stat. 1164) for construction of a Reserve Train-
ing Center Complex at Dam Neck, Virginia, the Secretary 
of the Navy may construct the Reserve Training Center 
Complex at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story, 
Virginia. 
SEC. 2612. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115- 
91; 131 Stat. 1834) for Fort Belvoir, Virginia, for addi-
tions and alterations to the National Guard Readiness 
Center, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new 
readiness center. 
SEC. 2613. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.— 
(1) PROJECT.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
carry out a military construction project to construct 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01234
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1235 
HR 5515 PCS
a 50,000 square foot reserve training center, 6,600 
square foot combat vehicle maintenance and storage 
facility, 2,400 square foot vehicle wash rack, 1,600 
square foot covered training area, road improve-
ments, and associated supporting facilities. 
(2) ACQUISITION
OF
LAND.—As part of the 
project under this subsection, the Secretary may ac-
quire approximately 8.5 acres of adjacent land and 
obtain necessary interest in land at Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania, for the construction and operation of 
the reserve training center. 
(3) AMOUNT
OF
AUTHORIZATION.—The total 
amount of funds the Secretary may obligate and ex-
pend on activities under this subsection during fiscal 
year 2019 may not exceed $17,650,000. 
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR NAVY MILI-
TARY CONSTRUCTION RESERVE FUNDS.—The Secretary 
may use available, unobligated Navy military construction 
reserve funds for the project described in subsection (a). 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary 
of the Navy shall provide information in accordance with 
section 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding 
the project described in subsection (a). If it becomes nec-
essary to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary 
shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01235
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1236 
HR 5515 PCS
title regarding authorized cost and scope of work vari-
ations. 
TITLE 
XXVII—BASE 
REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for base 
realignment and closure activities, including real property 
acquisition and military construction projects, as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act 
of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 
10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 
2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
(division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as 
specified in the funding table in section 7601. 
SEC. 2702. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO REALIGN OR CLOSE 
CERTAIN MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding sections 993 
or 2687 of title 10, United States Code, and subject to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01236
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1237 
HR 5515 PCS
subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may take such 
actions as may be necessary to carry out the realignment 
or closure of a military installation in a State during a 
fiscal year if— 
(1) the military installation is the subject of a 
notice which is described in subsection (b); and 
(2) the Secretary includes the military installa-
tion in the report submitted under paragraph (2) of 
subsection (c) with respect to the fiscal year. 
(b) NOTICE FROM GOVERNOR OF STATE.—A notice 
described in this subsection is a notice received by the Sec-
retary of Defense from the Governor of a State (or, in 
the case of the District of Columbia, the Mayor of the 
District of Columbia) in which the Governor recommends 
that the Secretary carry out the realignment or closure 
of a military installation located in the State, and which 
includes each of the following elements: 
(1) A specific description of the military instal-
lation, or a specific description of the relevant real 
and personal property. 
(2) Statements of support for the realignment 
or closure from units of local government in which 
the installation is located. 
(3) A detailed plan for the reuse or redevelop-
ment of the real and personal property of the instal-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01237
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1238 
HR 5515 PCS
lation, together with a description of the local rede-
velopment authority which will be responsible for the 
implementation of the plan. 
(c) RESPONSE TO NOTICE.— 
(1) MANDATORY RESPONSE TO GOVERNOR AND 
CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year after receiving a 
notice from the Governor of a State (or, in the case 
of the District of Columbia, from the Mayor of the 
District of Columbia), the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit a response to the notice to the Governor and 
the congressional defense committees indicating 
whether or not the Secretary accepts the rec-
ommendation for the realignment or closure of a 
military installation which is the subject of the no-
tice. 
(2) ACCEPTANCE
OF
RECOMMENDATION.—If 
the Secretary of Defense determines that it is in the 
interests of the United States to accept the rec-
ommendation for the realignment or closure of a 
military installation which is the subject of a notice 
received under subsection (b) and intends to carry 
out the realignment or closure of the installation 
pursuant to the authority of this section during a 
fiscal year, at the time the budget is submitted 
under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01238
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1239 
HR 5515 PCS
Code, for the fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit 
a report to the congressional defense committees 
which includes the following: 
(A) The identification of each military in-
stallation for which the Secretary intends to 
carry out a realignment or closure pursuant to 
the authority of this section during the fiscal 
year, together with the reasons the Secretary of 
Defense believes that it is in the interest of the 
United States to accept the recommendation of 
the Governor of the State involved for the re-
alignment or closure of the installation. 
(B) For each military installation identi-
fied under subparagraph (A), a master plan de-
scribing the required scope of work, cost, and 
timing for all facility actions needed to carry 
out the realignment or closure, including the 
construction of new facilities and the repair or 
renovation of existing facilities. 
(C) For each military installation identified 
under subparagraph (A), a certification that, 
not later than the end of the fifth fiscal year 
after the completion of the realignment or clo-
sure, the savings resulting from the realignment 
or closure will exceed the costs of carrying out 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01239
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1240 
HR 5515 PCS
the realignment or closure, together with an es-
timate of the annual recurring savings that 
would be achieved by the realignment or closure 
of the installation and the timeframe required 
for the financial savings to exceed the costs of 
carrying out the realignment or closure. 
(d) LIMITATIONS.— 
(1) TIMING.—The Secretary may not initiate 
the realignment or closure of a military installation 
pursuant to the authority of this section until the 
expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the 
date the Secretary submits the report under para-
graph (2) of subsection (c). 
(2) TOTAL COSTS.—Subject to appropriations, 
the aggregate cost to the government in carrying out 
the realignment or closure of military installations 
pursuant to the authority of this section for all fiscal 
years may not exceed $2,000,000,000. In deter-
mining the cost to the government for purposes of 
this section, there shall be included the costs of 
planning and design, military construction, oper-
ations and maintenance, environmental restoration, 
information technology, termination of public-private 
contracts, guarantees, and other factors contributing 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01240
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1241 
HR 5515 PCS
to the cost of carrying out the realignment or clo-
sure, as determined by the Secretary. 
(e) PROCESS
FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The imple-
mentation of the realignment or closure of a military in-
stallation pursuant to the authority of this section shall 
be carried out in accordance with section 2905 of the De-
fense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (title 
XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) in 
the same manner as the implementation of a realignment 
or closure of a military installation pursuant to the au-
thority of such Act. 
(f) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘State’’ means each of the several States, the District of 
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American 
Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 
(g) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of 
the Secretary to carry out a realignment or closure pursu-
ant to this section shall terminate at the end of fiscal year 
2029. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01241
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1284 
HR 5515 PCS
to whether or not the parcel is included in the inventory 
under subsection (b). 
(e) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall 
publish and update on a public website of the United 
States Government the following information: 
(1) The inventory maintained under subsection 
(a), including the parcels required to be included in 
such inventory under subsection (b). 
(2) All requests submitted by the Governor 
under subsection (c), including any proposed public 
benefit use or public purpose specified in any such 
request. 
(3) A copy of each response provided by the 
Secretary to each request submitted by the Governor 
under subsection (c). 
(4) A description of each parcel of land trans-
ferred by the Secretary to the territorial government 
after January 20, 2011, including the following: 
(A) The approximate size of the parcel. 
(B) An estimate of the fair market value 
of the parcel, if available or as practicable. 
(C) The specific legal authority under 
which the Secretary transferred the parcel to 
the territorial government. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01284
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1412 
HR 5515 PCS
(15) Section 12119(a)(3) of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘section 
2101(20)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2101(26)’’. 
(16) Section 80302(d) of title 46, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘of the Coast Guard’’ 
the first place it appears. 
(17) Section 1101 of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Section 2101(17a)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Section 2101(23)’’. 
SEC. 3542. AUTHORITY TO EXEMPT VESSELS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2113 of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by adding ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the 
end of paragraph (3); and 
(2) by striking paragraphs (4) and (5) and in-
serting the following: 
‘‘(4) maintain different structural fire protec-
tion, manning, operating, and equipment require-
ments for vessels that satisfied requirements set 
forth in the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 
(Public Law 103–206) before June 21, 1994.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 3306(i) of 
title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘sec-
tion 2113(5)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2113(4)’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01412
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1413 
HR 5515 PCS
SEC. 3543. PASSENGER VESSELS. 
(a) Section 3507 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (a)(3); 
(2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ‘‘services 
confidential’’ and inserting ‘‘services as confiden-
tial’’; and 
(3) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘Within 6 
months after the date of enactment of the Cruise 
Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010, the Sec-
retary shall issue’’ and insert ‘‘The Secretary shall 
maintain’’. 
(b) Section 3508 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Within 1 
year after the date of enactment of the Cruise Vessel 
Security and Safety Act of 2010, the’’ and inserting 
‘‘The’’, and by striking ‘‘develop’’ and inserting 
‘‘maintain’’; 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘Beginning 2 
years after the standards are established under sub-
section (b), no’’ and inserting ‘‘No’’; 
(3) by striking subsection (d) and redesignating 
subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), 
respectively; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01413
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1414 
HR 5515 PCS
(4) in subsection (e), as redesignated by para-
graph (3), by striking ‘‘subsection (e)’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 
SEC. 3544. TANK VESSELS. 
(a) Section 3703a of title 46, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (3) 
and redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) as 
paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; 
(2) in subsection (c)(2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘that is delivered’’ and in-
serting ‘‘that was delivered’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘that qualifies’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘that qualified’’; and 
(C) by striking ‘‘after January 1, 2015,’’; 
(3) in subsection (c)(3)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘that is delivered’’ and in-
serting ‘‘that was delivered’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘that qualifies’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘that qualified’’; 
(4) by striking subsection (c)(3)(A) and insert-
ing the following: 
‘‘(A) in the case of a vessel of at least 5,000 
gross tons but less than 15,000 gross tons as meas-
ured under section 14502, or an alternate tonnage 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01414
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
1427 
HR 5515 PCS
pographical errors in the legal description 
and map. 
(2) MISSILE RANGE.—The Public Land Order 
is modified to exclude the land transferred to the 
Secretary under subsection (b)(1) and to include the 
land transferred to the Secretary of the Army under 
subsection (b)(1). 
(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2854 
of Public Law 104–201 (54 U.S.C. 320301 note) is 
repealed. 
(d) ADMINISTRATION.— 
(1) MONUMENT.—The Secretary shall admin-
ister the land transferred under subsection (b)(1) in 
accordance with laws (including regulations) applica-
ble to the monument. 
(2) MISSILE RANGE.—Subject to paragraph (3), 
the Secretary of the Army shall administer the land 
transferred to the Secretary of the Army under sub-
section (b)(2) as part of the missile range. 
(3) FENCE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the 
Army shall continue to allow the Secretary to 
maintain the fence shown on the map described 
in subsection (b)(1)(B) until such time as the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:09 Jun 05, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 01427
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5515.PCS
H5515
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS