SEC. 4152. COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UTAH. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for streambank sta-
bilization for Cottonwood Heights, Utah. 
SEC. 4153. EMERY TOWN, UTAH. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of 
existing water supply resources for Emery Town, Utah. 
SEC. 4154. BIG SANDY RIVER REALLOCATION STUDY, VIR-
GINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of reallocating water 
storage at 6 reservoirs to optimize benefits for multiple-pur-
pose use in the Big Sandy River watershed, Virginia and 
West Virginia. 
SEC. 4155. BUCKROE AND GRANDVIEW BEACHES, HAMPTON, 
VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection 
for Buckroe and Grandview Beaches, Hampton, Virginia. 
SEC. 4156. FORT MONROE, HAMPTON, VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, including offshore breakwaters, for Fort 
Monroe, Hampton, Virginia. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4157. HAMPTON, VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction and shoreline protection for Hampton, 
Virginia. 
SEC. 4158. JAMES RIVER WATERSHED, VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the water resource needs, including 
current and projected future needs, for the James River wa-
tershed, Virginia. 
SEC. 4159. ELLIOTT BAY, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation channel 
deepening for Elliott Bay, Seattle, Washington. 
SEC. 4160. GREEN RIVER, KENT, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Green River, Kent, Washington. 
SEC. 4161. VANCOUVER LAKE WATERSHED, VANCOUVER, 
WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for environmental quality and environmental res-
toration, especially related to salmon and steelhead recovery 
issues, for the Vancouver Lake watershed, Vancouver, Wash-
ington. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4162. LAKE MICHIGAN SHORELINE, CITY OF CUDAHY, 
WISCONSIN. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection 
for the Lake Michigan shoreline, City of Cudahy, Wis-
consin. 
TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS 
SEC. 5001. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORA-
TION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 510 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat. 1202) 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ‘‘pilot’’; 
(2) in subsection (d)(2) by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(C) IN-KIND
SERVICES.—In accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b), the non-Federal interest 
may provide any portion of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project carried out under 
this section in the form of in-kind services and 
materials. 
‘‘(D) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN FUNDS.—In 
accordance with section 2007 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
2222), funds provided by a Federal department 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
or agency other than the Corps of Engineers for 
a project carried out under this section shall be 
credited towards the non-Federal share of the 
cost of project.’’; 
(3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), 
and (i) as subsections (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), respec-
tively; 
(4) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(e) COST LIMITATION.—Not more than $10,000,000 
in Federal funds may be allotted under this section for a 
project at any single locality.’’; 
(5) by striking subsection (g) (as redesignated by 
paragraph (3) of this subsection) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(g) PROJECTS.—The Secretary may carry out 
projects under this section in the Chesapeake Bay water-
shed, with the goal of carrying out projects in each of the 
States of Delaware, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, 
Virginia, and West Virginia and the District of Colum-
bia.’’; and 
(6) in subsection (j) (as redesignated by para-
graph 
(3) 
of 
this 
subsection) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$40,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(b) RESTORATION
OF
CHESAPEAKE
BAY
ECO-
SYSTEM.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
develop at Federal expense and submit to Congress a 
comprehensive plan to prioritize projects within the 
Chesapeake Bay watershed, including projects in the 
Anacostia, Elizabeth, James, Patapsco, Patuxent, Po-
tomac, Rappahannock, Susquehanna, and York River 
basins. 
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall ensure 
that the plan developed under paragraph (1)— 
(A) focuses on integrating existing and po-
tential future work of the Corps of Engineers; 
(B) is developed in consultation with the 
Chesapeake Bay Program maintained under sec-
tion 117 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1267)); and 
(C) encompasses all actions of the Corps of 
Engineers that are necessary to assist in the im-
plementation of the goals of the Chesapeake Bay 
Agreement, as defined in section 117 of the Fed-
eral Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1267)). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(3) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this subsection $1,000,000. 
SEC. 5002. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY. 
Section 5015(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1196) is amended by striking 
‘‘$134,650,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$185,638,028’’. 
SEC. 5003. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT. 
Section 5002(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1190) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (9) by striking ‘‘Esopus, 
Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks’’ and inserting 
‘‘Esopus, Rondout, and Wallkill watersheds’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(19) San Gabriel River watershed, California. 
‘‘(20) South Platte River watershed, Colorado. 
‘‘(21) Loxahatchee River watershed, Jupiter, 
Florida. 
‘‘(22) 
Hudson 
River 
watershed, 
Orange, 
Dutchess, and Ulster Counties, New York. 
‘‘(23) Muskingum River basin, Ohio.’’. 
SEC. 5004. COMPREHENSIVE SHORELINE RESTORATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may participate in 
the ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduc-
tion, and emergency streambank protection components of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
100 
projects at the locations described in subsection (b) if the 
Secretary determines that such component is feasible. 
(b) PROJECT LOCATIONS.—The locations referred to in 
subsection (a) are as follows: 
(1) Miller Knox Shoreline, Richmond, Cali-
fornia. 
(2) Mississippi River, Davenport, Iowa. 
(3) Lake Michigan (in the vicinity of the former 
USX Site), Chicago, Illinois. 
(4) Pond and Mill Creek watershed, Louisville, 
Kentucky. 
(5) Massachusetts Bay (in the vicinity of Georges 
Island), Boston, Massachusetts. 
(6) Mississippi River (in the vicinity of the 
lower St. Anthony Falls), Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
(7) Brush Creek, Kansas City, Missouri. 
(8) Mississippi River, Kimmswick, Missouri. 
(9) Delaware River, Trenton, New Jersey. 
(10) East River, New York, New York. 
(11) Upper New York Bay, Staten Island, New 
York. 
(12) Abbott’s Creek, Lexington, North Carolina. 
(13) Ohio River, Belpre, Ohio. 
(14) Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, Pennsyl-
vania. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
101 
(15) Ohio, Allegheny, and Monongahela Rivers, 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 
(16) Ohio River, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 
(17) Fields Point, Narragansett Bay, Providence, 
Rhode Island. 
(18) Congaree River, Columbia, South Carolina. 
(19) Wolf Creek Harbor, Mississippi River, Ten-
nessee. 
(20) Ruston Way Seawall, Commencement Bay, 
Tacoma, Washington. 
(21) Lower Yahara River, McFarland, Wis-
consin. 
(c) COST LIMITATION.—Not more than $5,000,000 in 
Federal funds may be allotted under this section for a 
project at any single locality. 
(d) RECREATION.—The Secretary may include rec-
reational components as part of a project carried out under 
this section. 
(e) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be appropriated 
to carry out this section $25,000,000 for each fiscal years 
2011 through 2016. 
SEC. 5005. NORTHEAST COASTAL REGION ECOSYSTEM RES-
TORATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall plan, design, 
and construct projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
102 
within the coastal waters of the Northeastern United States 
from Virginia to Maine, including associated bays, estu-
aries, and critical riverine areas. 
(b) GENERAL COASTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 
(1) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary, in coordina-
tion with the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, the heads of other appropriate 
Federal agencies, the Governors of the coastal States 
from Virginia to Maine, nonprofit organizations, and 
other interested parties, shall assess the needs regard-
ing, and opportunities for, aquatic ecosystem restora-
tion within the coastal waters of the Northeastern 
United States. 
(2) PLAN.—The Secretary shall develop a general 
coastal management plan based on the assessment 
carried out under paragraph (1), maximizing the use 
of existing plans and investigations. The Secretary 
shall include in the plan the following: 
(A) An inventory and evaluation of coastal 
habitats. 
(B) Identification of aquatic resources in 
need of improvement. 
(C) Identification and prioritization of po-
tential aquatic habitat restoration projects. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
103 
(D) Identification of geographical and eco-
logical areas of concern, including— 
(i) finfish habitats; 
(ii) diadromous fisheries migratory 
corridors; 
(iii) shellfish habitats; 
(iv) submerged aquatic vegetation; 
(v) wetlands; and 
(vi) beach dune complexes and other 
similar habitats. 
(c) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—The Secretary may carry 
out an aquatic ecosystem restoration project under this sec-
tion if the project— 
(1) is consistent with the management plan de-
veloped under subsection (b); and 
(2) provides for— 
(A) the restoration of degraded aquatic 
habitat (including coastal, saltmarsh, benthic, 
and riverine habitat); 
(B) the restoration of geographical or eco-
logical areas of concern, including the restora-
tion of natural river and stream characteristics; 
(C) the improvement of water quality; or 
(D) other projects or activities determined 
to be appropriate by the Secretary. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
104 
(d) COST SHARING.— 
(1) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The management plan 
developed under subsection (b) shall be completed at 
Federal expense. 
(2) RESTORATION PROJECTS.—The non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project carried out under this 
section shall be 35 percent. 
(e) COST LIMITATION.—Not more than $10,000,000 in 
Federal funds may be allocated under this section for an 
eligible project. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$25,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 and each fiscal year there-
after, including funds for the completion of the management 
plan. 
SEC. 5006. ANACOSTIA WATERSHED, DISTRICT OF COLUM-
BIA AND MARYLAND. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may participate in 
the ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduc-
tion, emergency streambank protection, and aquatic plant 
control components of the Anacostia River Watershed Res-
toration Plan, developed pursuant to section 5060 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1215), 
if the Secretary determines that such component is feasible. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS