121
‘‘(3) HIGH
OCCUPANCY
TOLL
VEHICLES.—The 
State agency may allow vehicles not otherwise exempt 
pursuant to this subsection to use the HOV facility if 
the operators of such vehicles pay a toll charged by 
the agency for use of the facility and the agency—
‘‘(A) establishes a program that addresses 
how motorists can enroll and participate in the 
toll program; 
‘‘(B) develops, manages, and maintains a 
system that will automatically collect the toll; 
and 
‘‘(C) establishes policies and procedures 
to—
‘‘(i) manage the demand to use the fa-
cility by varying the toll amount that is 
charged; 
‘‘(ii) enforce violations of use of the fa-
cility; and 
‘‘(iii) permit low-income individuals to 
pay reduced tolls. 
‘‘(4) LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT VE-
HICLES.—
‘‘(A) INHERENTLY
LOW-EMISSION
VEHI-
CLE.—Before September 30, 2009, the State 
agency may allow vehicles that are certified as
122
inherently low-emission vehicles pursuant to sec-
tion 88.311–93 of title 40, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, and are labeled in accordance with sec-
tion 88.312–93 of such title, to use the HOV fa-
cility if the agency establishes procedures for en-
forcing the restrictions on the use of the facility 
by such vehicles. 
‘‘(B) OTHER LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-
EFFICIENT
VEHICLES.—Before September 30, 
2009, the State agency may allow vehicles cer-
tified as low emission and energy-efficient vehi-
cles under subsection (e), and labeled in accord-
ance with subsection (e), to use the HOV facility 
if the operators of such vehicles pay a toll 
charged by the agency for use of the facility and 
the agency—
‘‘(i) establishes a program that ad-
dresses the selection of vehicles under this 
paragraph; and 
‘‘(ii) establishes procedures for enforc-
ing the restrictions on the use of the facility 
by such vehicles. 
‘‘(C) AMOUNT
OF
TOLLS.—Tolls charged 
under subparagraph (B) may be less than tolls 
charged under paragraph (3).
123
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TOLLS.——
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Tolls may be charged under 
subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) notwithstanding section 
301 and, except as provided in paragraphs (2) and 
(3), subject to the requirements of section 129. 
‘‘(2) HOV FACILITIES ON THE INTERSTATE SYS-
TEM.—Notwithstanding section 129, tolls may be 
charged under subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) on a 
HOV facility on the Interstate System. 
‘‘(3) EXCESS TOLL REVENUES.—If a State agen-
cy makes a certification under the last sentence of sec-
tion 129(a)(3) with respect to toll revenues collected 
under under subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4), the State, 
in the use of tolls revenues under that sentence, shall 
give priority consideration to projects for developing 
alternatives to single occupancy vehicle travel and 
projects for improving highway safety. 
‘‘(d) HOV FACILITY MANAGEMENT, OPERATION, MON-
ITORING, AND ENFORCEMENT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A State agency that allows 
vehicles to use a HOV facility under subsection (b)(3) 
or (b)(4) in a fiscal year shall certify to the Secretary 
that the agency will carry out the following respon-
sibilities with respect to the facility in the fiscal year:
124
‘‘(A) Establishing, managing, and sup-
porting a performance monitoring, evaluation, 
and reporting program for the facility that pro-
vides for continuous monitoring, assessment, and 
reporting on the impacts that such vehicles may 
have on the operation of the facility and adja-
cent highways. 
‘‘(B) Establishing, managing, and sup-
porting an enforcement program that ensures 
that the facility is being operated in accordance 
with the requirements of this section. 
‘‘(C) Limiting or discontinuing the use of 
the facility by such vehicles if the presence of 
such vehicles has degraded the operation of the 
facility. 
‘‘(2) DEGRADED FACILITY.——
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para-
graph (1), the operation of a HOV facility shall 
be considered to be degraded if vehicles operating 
on the facility are failing to maintain a min-
imum average operating speed 90 percent of the 
time over a consecutive 6-month period during 
morning or evening weekday peak hour periods 
(or both).
125
‘‘(B) MINIMUM AVERAGE OPERATING SPEED 
DEFINED.—In subparagraph (A), the term ‘min-
imum average operating speed’ means—
‘‘(i) 45 miles per hour, in the case of 
a HOV facility with a speed limit of 50 
miles per hour or greater; and 
‘‘(ii) not more than 10 miles per hour 
below the speed limit, in the case of a HOV 
facility with a speed limit of less than 50 
miles per hour. 
‘‘(e) CERTIFICATION OF LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-
EFFICIENT VEHICLES.—Not later than 6 months after the 
date of enactment of this section, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall issue a final rule 
establishing requirements for certification of vehicles as low 
emission and energy-efficient vehicles for purposes of this 
section and requirements for the labeling of such vehicles. 
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
‘‘(1) ALTERNATIVE
FUEL
VEHICLE.—The term 
‘alternative fuel vehicle’ means a vehicle that operates 
on—
‘‘(A) methanol, denatured ethanol, or other 
alcohols;
126
‘‘(B) a mixture containing at least 85 per-
cent of methanol, denatured ethanol, and other 
alcohols by volume with gasoline or other fuels; 
‘‘(C) natural gas; 
‘‘(D) liquefied petroleum gas; 
‘‘(E) hydrogen; 
‘‘(F) coal derived liquid fuels; 
‘‘(G) fuels (except alcohol) derived from bio-
logical materials; 
‘‘(H) electricity (including electricity from 
solar energy); or 
‘‘(I) any other fuel that the Secretary pre-
scribes by regulation that is not substantially pe-
troleum and that would yield substantial energy 
security and environmental benefits. 
‘‘(2) HOV FACILITY.—The term ‘HOV facility’ 
means a high occupancy vehicle facility. 
‘‘(3) LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY EFFICIENT VE-
HICLE.—The term ‘low emission and energy-efficient 
vehicle’ means a vehicle that—
‘‘(A) has been certified by the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency as meet-
ing the Tier II emission level established in regu-
lations prescribed by the Administrator under 
section 202(i) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
127
7521(i)) for that make and model year vehicle; 
and 
‘‘(B)(i) has been certified by the Adminis-
trator to have a 45-mile-per-gallon or greater 
fuel economy highway rating; or 
‘‘(ii) is an alternative fuel vehicle. 
‘‘(4) PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION
VEHICLE.—The 
term ‘public transportation vehicle’ means a vehicle 
that provides public transportation (as defined in sec-
tion 5302(a) of title 49). 
‘‘(5) STATE AGENCY.—The term ‘State agency’, 
as used with respect to a HOV facility, means an 
agency of a State or local government having juris-
diction over the operation of the facility and includes 
a State transportation department.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) PROGRAM
EFFICIENCIES.—Section 102 of 
title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (a) and redesignating subsections (b) and 
(c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively. 
(2) CHAPTER ANALYSIS.—The analysis for sub-
chapter I of chapter 1 of such title is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
‘‘167. HOV facilities.’’.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 102(c) of title 
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘10 years’’
128
and all that follows through ‘‘after’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years 
(or such longer period as the State requests and the Sec-
retary determines to be reasonable) after’’. 
SEC. 1209. CONGESTION PRICING PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Section 1012(b)(1) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 
U.S.C. 149 note; 105 Stat. 1938) is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary may 
enter into cooperative agreements with State and 
local governments to carry out not more than 25 
congestion pricing pilot projects. 
‘‘(B) PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS.—
Projects carried out under paragraph (1) shall 
include each project approved under this sub-
section before the date of enactment of the Trans-
portation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users and 
under which highway tolls are being collected as 
of such date of enactment.’’. 
(b) LOW-INCOME DRIVERS.—Section 1012(b)(7) of 
such Act (23 U.S.C. 149 note) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(7) REDUCED TOLLS FOR LOW-INCOME DRIV-
ERS.—Any congestion pricing pilot project carried 
out under this subsection that involves the collection
129
of highway tolls shall include a program to permit 
low-income drivers to pay a reduced toll amount.’’. 
(c) SET-ASIDE FOR PROJECTS NOT INVOLVING HIGH-
WAY TOLLS.—At the end of section 1012(b)(8) of such Act 
(23 U.S.C. 149 note), add the following: 
‘‘(D) SET-ASIDE
FOR
PROJECTS
NOT
IN-
VOLVING
HIGHWAY
TOLLS.—Of the amounts 
made available to carry out this subsection, 
$3,000,000 per fiscal year shall be available only 
for congestion pricing pilot projects that do not 
involve highway tolls.’’. 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1012(b) of 
such Act (23 U.S.C. 149 note) is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading by striking ‘‘VALUE 
PRICING’’ and inserting ‘‘CONGESTION PRICING’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(A) by striking ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(2) FEDERAL SHARE; ELIGIBLE COSTS.—Not-
withstanding’’; 
(B) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘pro-
grams’’ and inserting ‘‘projects’’; and 
(C) in the second sentence by striking ‘‘pro-
gram’’ and inserting ‘‘project’’;
130
(3) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘(3) Revenues’’ 
and inserting the following: 
‘‘(3) USE OF REVENUES.—Revenues’’; 
(4) in paragraph (4)—
(A) by striking ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(4) USE OF TOLLS ON INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—
Notwithstanding’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘value pricing pilot pro-
gram’’ and inserting ‘‘congestion pricing pilot 
project’’; 
(5) in paragraph (5)—
(A) by striking ‘‘(5) The Secretary’’ and in-
serting the following: 
‘‘(5) MONITORING.—The Secretary’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘programs’’ the first and 
second place it appears and inserting ‘‘projects’’; 
and 
(6) in paragraph (6) by striking ‘‘value pricing 
pilot program’’ and inserting ‘‘congestion pricing 
pilot project’’. 
(e) PORT HURON, MICHIGAN.——
(1) TRAFFIC STUDY.—There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $100,000 for a traffic 
study to be conducted in Port Huron, Michigan, in
131
connection with economic development that may re-
sult from the implementation of the agreement of the 
State of Michigan resolving a title dispute concerning 
certain property, executed on August 23, 2002, and 
filed with the Michigan department of State on Sep-
tember 20, 2002. 
(2) RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT.—The agree-
ment is hereby ratified. 
(3) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN LANDS.—The alter-
native lands described in the agreement shall be treat-
ed 
as 
meeting 
the 
requirements 
of 
section 
20(b)(1)(B)(i) of Public Law 100–497 (25 U.S.C. 
2719(b)(1)(B)(i)). 
(4) TRUST.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 
take the alternative lands into trust for the benefit of 
the non-State party within 60 days of the non-State 
party’s acquisition of the land described in section 4 
of the agreement. 
(5) EXTINGUISHMENT OF CLAIM.—Upon imple-
mentation, the claim to the lands of the non-State 
party described in section 1 of the agreement is here-
by extinguished. 
(f) ROMULUS, MICHIGAN.—
(1) TRAFFIC STUDY.—There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $100,000 for a traffic
132
study to be conducted in Romulus, Michigan, in con-
nection with economic development that may result 
from the implementation of the agreement of the State 
of Michigan resolving a title dispute concerning cer-
tain property, executed on December 30, 2002, and 
filed with the Michigan department of state on De-
cember 30, 2002. 
(2) RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT.—The agree-
ment is hereby ratified. 
(3) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN LANDS.—The alter-
native lands described in the agreement are deemed to 
meet the requirements of section 20(b)(1)(B)(i) of 
Public Law 100–497 (25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(B)(i)). 
(4) TRUST.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 
take the alternative lands into trust for the benefit of 
the non-State party within 60 days of the non-State 
party’s acquisition of the land described in section 
4(B)(ii) of the agreement, the non-State party having 
exercised its options under the agreement to so limit 
its alternative lands. 
(5) EXTINGUISHMENT OF CLAIM.—Upon imple-
mentation, the claim to the lands of the non-State 
party described in section 1 of the agreement is here-
by extinguished.
133
Subtitle C—Mobility and Efficiency 
SEC. 1301. NATIONAL CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE IM-
PROVEMENT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish and 
implement a program to make allocations to States for 
highway construction projects in corridors of national sig-
nificance to promote economic growth and international or 
interregional trade pursuant to the selection factors pro-
vided in this section. A State must submit an application 
to the Secretary in order to receive an allocation under this 
section. 
(b) SELECTION PROCESS.—
(1) PRIORITY.—In the selection process under 
this section, the Secretary shall give priority to 
projects in corridors that are a part of, or will be des-
ignated as part of, the Dwight D. Eisenhower Na-
tional System of Interstate and Defense Highways 
after completion of the work described in the applica-
tion received by the Secretary and to any project that 
will be completed within 5 years of the date of the al-
location of funds for the project. 
(2) SELECTION
FACTORS.—In making alloca-
tions under this section, the Secretary shall consider 
the following factors:
134
(A) The extent to which the corridor pro-
vides a link between 2 existing segments of the 
Interstate System. 
(B) The extent to which the project will fa-
cilitate major multistate or regional mobility 
and economic growth and development in areas 
underserved by existing highway infrastructure. 
(C) The extent to which commercial vehicle 
traffic in the corridor—
(i) has increased since the date of en-
actment of the North American Free Trade 
Agreement Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 
4401 et seq.); and 
(ii) is projected to increase in the fu-
ture. 
(D) The extent to which international 
truck-borne commodities move through the cor-
ridor. 
(E) The extent to which the project will 
make improvements to an existing segment of the 
Interstate System that will result in a decrease 
in congestion. 
(F) The reduction in commercial and other 
travel time through a major freight corridor ex-
pected as a result of the project.
135
(G) The value of the cargo carried by com-
mercial vehicle traffic in the corridor and the 
economic costs arising from congestion in the 
corridor. 
(H) The extent of leveraging of Federal 
funds provided to carry out this section, includ-
ing—
(i) use of innovative financing; 
(ii) combination with funding pro-
vided under other sections of this Act and 
title 23, United States Code; and 
(iii) combination with other sources of 
Federal, State, local, or private funding. 
(c) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds allocated for a 
project to a State under this section shall remain available 
for obligation in that State until 6 months from the day 
on which they are allocated. Sums not obligated within 6 
months of the day on which they are allocated shall be 
available to the Secretary to be allocated for other projects 
eligible under this section. 
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of a project under this section shall be determined in accord-
ance with section 120(b) of title 23, United States Code. 
(e) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Except as provided 
in subsections (c) and (d), funds made available by section
136
1101(a)(10) of this Act to carry out this section shall be 
available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds 
were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States 
Code. 
(f) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘State’’ 
has the meaning such term has under section 101 of title 
23, United States Code. 
SEC. 1302. COORDINATED BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall im-
plement a coordinated border infrastructure program under 
which the Secretary shall distribute funds to border States 
to improve the safe movement of motor vehicles at or across 
the border between the United States and Canada and the 
border between the United States and Mexico. 
(b) ELIGIBLE USES.—A State may use funds appor-
tioned under this section only for—
(1) improvements in a border region to existing 
transportation and supporting infrastructure that fa-
cilitate cross-border motor vehicle and cargo move-
ments; 
(2) construction of highways and related safety 
and safety enforcement facilities in a border region 
that facilitate motor vehicle and cargo movements re-
lated to international trade;
137
(3) operational improvements in a border region, 
including improvements relating to electronic data 
interchange and use of telecommunications, to expe-
dite cross border motor vehicle and cargo movement; 
(4) modifications to regulatory procedures to ex-
pedite safe and efficient cross border motor vehicle 
and cargo movements; and 
(5) international coordination of transportation 
planning, programming, and border operation with 
Canada and Mexico relating to expediting cross bor-
der motor vehicle and cargo movements. 
(c) APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS.—On October 1 of each 
fiscal year, the Secretary shall apportion among border 
States sums authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
section for such fiscal year as follows: 
(1) 20 percent in the ratio that—
(A) the total number of incoming commer-
cial trucks that pass through the land border 
ports of entry within the boundaries of a border 
State, as determined by the Secretary; bears to 
(B) the total number of incoming commer-
cial trucks that pass through such ports of entry 
within the boundaries of all the border States, as 
determined by the Secretary. 
(2) 30 percent in the ratio that—
138
(A) the total number of incoming personal 
motor vehicles and incoming buses that pass 
through land border ports of entry within the 
boundaries of a border State, as determined by 
the Secretary; bears to 
(B) the total number of incoming personal 
motor vehicles and incoming buses that pass 
through such ports of entry within the bound-
aries of all the border States, as determined by 
the Secretary. 
(3) 25 percent in the ratio that—
(A) the total weight of incoming cargo by 
commercial trucks that pass through land border 
ports of entry within the boundaries of a border 
State, as determined by the Secretary; bears to 
(B) the total weight of incoming cargo by 
commercial trucks that pass through such ports 
of entry within the boundaries of all the border 
States, as determined by the Secretary. 
(4) 25 percent of the ratio that—
(A) the total number of land border ports of 
entry within the boundaries of a border State, as 
determined by the Secretary; bears to
139
(B) the total number of land border ports of 
entry within the boundaries of all the border 
States, as determined by the Secretary. 
(d) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds made avail-
able to carry out this section shall be available for obliga-
tion in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; except that 
such funds shall not be transferable and shall remain avail-
able until expended and the Federal share of the cost of a 
project under this section shall be 80 percent. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defini-
tions apply: 
(1) BORDER REGION.—The term ‘‘border region’’ 
means any portion of a border State within 20 miles 
of an international land border with Canada or Mex-
ico. 
(2) BORDER STATE.—The term ‘‘border State’’ 
means any State that has an international land bor-
der with Canada or Mexico. 
(3) COMMERCIAL TRUCK.—The term ‘‘commer-
cial truck’’ means a commercial motor vehicle as de-
fined in section 31301(4) (other than subparagraph 
(B)) of title 49, United States Code.
140
(4) MOTOR VEHICLE.—The term ‘‘motor vehicle’’ 
has the meaning such term has under section 101(a) 
of title 23, United States Code. 
(5) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the meaning 
such term has in section 101(a) of such title 23. 
SEC. 1303. FREIGHT INTERMODAL CONNECTORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall estab-
lish a freight intermodal connector program to im-
prove productivity and improve the efficiency of the 
transportation of freight, while mitigating congestion 
in the area of freight intermodal connectors. 
(2) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the program 
shall be—
(A) to facilitate and support intermodal 
freight transportation initiatives at the State 
and local levels in order to improve freight inter-
modal connectors and mitigate the impact of 
congestion in the area of such connectors; and 
(B) to provide capital funding to address 
infrastructure and freight operational needs at 
freight intermodal connectors. 
(b) STATE RESPONSIBILITIES.—Under the program, 
each State shall ensure that intermodal freight transpor-
tation and trade facilitation and are adequately addressed
141
integrated into the project development process, including 
transportation planning, through final design and con-
struction of freight related transportation projects. 
(c) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Projects eligible for funding 
under this section may include the construction of 
and improvements to publicly owned freight inter-
modal connectors, the provision of access to such con-
nectors, and operational improvements for such con-
nectors (including capital investment for intelligent 
transportation systems); except that a project located 
within the boundaries of an intermodal freight facil-
ity shall only include highway infrastructure modi-
fications necessary to facilitate direct intermodal ac-
cess between the connector and the facility. 
(2) SPECIAL RULE.—If a State that does not 
have any freight intermodal connectors within its 
boundaries or has only freight intermodal connectors 
within its boundaries that are in good condition and 
provide an adequate level of service, projects within 
the boundaries of the State that are eligible for assist-
ance under section 103(b)(6) of title 23, United States 
Code, relating to the National Highway System, shall 
be eligible for funding under this section.
142
(d) PRIORITY.—Under the program, a State shall give 
priority to projects on freight intermodal connectors to the 
National Highway System as identified according to the 
criteria set forth in the report of the Department of Trans-
portation to Congress entitled ‘‘Pulling Together: The NHS 
and its Connections to Major Intermodal Terminals’’. 
(e) APPORTIONMENT.—On October 1 of each fiscal 
year, the Secretary shall apportion among the States sums 
made available to carry out this section for such fiscal year 
as follows: 
(1) 33.3 percent in the ratio that—
(A) the number of freight intermodal con-
nectors identified in the most recent Intermodal 
Freight Connectors study of the Federal High-
way Administration within the boundaries of a 
State; bears to 
(B) the total number of such connectors 
within the boundaries of all the States. 
(2) 33.3 percent in the ratio that—
(A) the total of each State’s annual con-
tributions to the Highway Trust Fund (other 
than the Mass Transit Account) attributable to 
commercial motor vehicles; bears to 
(B) the total of such annual contributions 
by all States.
143
(3) 33.4 percent in the same ratios as funds are 
apportioned for the National Highway System under 
clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) of section 104(b)(1)(A) 
of title 23, United States Code. 
(f) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds made avail-
able to carry out this section shall be available for obliga-
tion in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; except that 
such funds shall not be transferable and shall remain avail-
able until expended and the Federal share of the cost of a 
project under this section shall be 80 percent. 
(g) UPDATE REPORT.—Not later than August 1, 2005, 
the Secretary shall publish an update to the report entitled 
‘‘Pulling Together: the National Highway System and its 
Connections to Major Intermodal Terminals’’. 
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
(1) FREIGHT
INTERMODAL
CONNECTORS.—The 
term ‘‘freight intermodal connector’’ means the road-
way that connects to an intermodal freight facility 
that carries or will carry intermodal traffic. 
(2) INTERMODAL FREIGHT FACILITY.—The term 
‘‘intermodal freight facility’’ means a port, airport, 
truck-rail terminal, and pipeline-truck terminal.
144
(3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the meaning 
such term has in section 101(a) of title 23, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 1304. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIG-
NIFICANCE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Under current law, surface transportation 
programs rely primarily on formula capital appor-
tionments to States. 
(2) Despite the significant increase for surface 
transportation program funding in the Transpor-
tation Equity Act of the 21st Century, current levels 
of investment are insufficient to fund critical high-
cost transportation infrastructure facilities that ad-
dress critical national economic and transportation 
needs. 
(3) Critical high-cost transportation infrastruc-
ture facilities often include multiple levels of govern-
ment, agencies, modes of transportation, and trans-
portation goals and planning processes that are not 
easily addressed or funded within existing surface 
transportation program categories. 
(4) Projects of national and regional significance 
have national and regional benefits, including im-
proving economic productivity by facilitating inter-
145
national trade, relieving congestion, and improving 
transportation safety by facilitating passenger and 
freight movement. 
(5) The benefits of such projects described in 
paragraph (4) accrue to local areas, States, and the 
Nation as a result of the effect such projects have on 
the national transportation system. 
(6) A program dedicated to constructing projects 
of national and regional significance is necessary to 
improve the safe, secure, and efficient movement of 
people and goods throughout the United States and 
improve the health and welfare of the national econ-
omy. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT
OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
shall establish a program to provide grants to qualified en-
tities for projects of national and regional significance. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—
(1) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.—The term ‘‘eligi-
ble project costs’’ means the costs of—
(A) development phase activities, including 
planning, feasibility analysis, revenue fore-
casting, environmental review, preliminary engi-
neering 
and 
design 
work, 
and 
other 
preconstruction activities; and
146
(B) construction, reconstruction, rehabilita-
tion, and acquisition of real property (including 
land related to the project and improvements to 
land), environmental mitigation, construction 
contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and 
operational improvements. 
(2) ELIGIBLE
PROJECT.—The term ‘‘eligible 
project’’ means any surface transportation project eli-
gible for Federal assistance under title 23, United 
States Code, including freight railroad projects and 
activities eligible under such title. 
(3) QUALIFIED ENTITY.—The term ‘‘qualified en-
tity’’ means a State as defined in section 101(a) of 
title 23, United States Code. 
(d) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible for assistance under 
this section, a project shall have eligible project costs that 
are reasonably anticipated to equal or exceed the lesser of—
(1) $500,000,000; or 
(2) 75 percent of the amount of Federal highway 
assistance funds apportioned for the most recently 
completed fiscal year to the State in which the project 
is located. 
(e) APPLICATIONS.—Each qualified entity seeking to 
receive a grant under this section for an eligible project 
shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form
147
and in accordance with such requirements as the Secretary 
shall establish. 
(f) COMPETITIVE GRANT SELECTION AND CRITERIA 
FOR GRANTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall—
(A) establish criteria for selecting among 
projects that meet the eligibility criteria specified 
in subsection (d); 
(B) conduct a national solicitation for ap-
plications; and 
(C) award grants on a competitive basis. 
(2) CRITERIA FOR GRANTS.—The Secretary may 
approve a grant under this section for a project only 
if the Secretary determines that the project—
(A) is based on the results of preliminary 
engineering; 
(B) is justified based on the project’s abil-
ity—
(i) to generate national economic bene-
fits, including creating jobs, expanding 
business opportunities, and impacting the 
gross domestic product; 
(ii) to reduce congestion, including im-
pacts in the State, region, and Nation;
148
(iii) to improve transportation safety, 
including reducing transportation acci-
dents, injuries, and fatalities; 
(iv) to otherwise enhance the national 
transportation system; and 
(v) to garner support for non-Federal 
financial commitments and provide evi-
dence of stable and dependable financing 
sources to construct, maintain, and operate 
the infrastructure facility; and 
(C) is supported by an acceptable degree of 
non-Federal financial commitments, including 
evidence of stable and dependable financing 
sources to construct, maintain, and operate the 
infrastructure facility. 
(3) SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS.—In selecting a 
project under this section, the Secretary shall consider 
the extent to which the project—
(A) leverages Federal investment by encour-
aging non-Federal contributions to the project, 
including 
contributions 
from 
public-private 
partnerships; 
(B) uses new technologies, including intel-
ligent transportation systems, that enhance the 
efficiency of the project.
149
(C) helps maintain or protect the environ-
ment. 
(4) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING.—In evaluating 
a project under paragraph (2)(A), the Secretary shall 
analyze and consider the results of preliminary engi-
neering for the project. 
(5) NON-FEDERAL FINANCIAL COMMITMENT.—
(A) EVALUATION OF PROJECT.—In evalu-
ating a project under paragraph (2)(C), the Sec-
retary shall require that—
(i) the proposed project plan provides 
for the availability of contingency amounts 
that the Secretary determines to be reason-
able to cover unanticipated cost increases; 
and 
(ii) each proposed non-Federal source 
of capital and operating financing is stable, 
reliable, and available within the proposed 
project timetable. 
(B) CONSIDERATIONS.—In assessing the 
stability, reliability, and availability of proposed 
sources of non-Federal financing under subpara-
graph (A), the Secretary shall consider—
(i) existing financial commitments;
150
(ii) the degree to which financing 
sources are dedicated to the purposes pro-
posed; 
(iii) any debt obligation that exists or 
is proposed by the recipient for the proposed 
project; and 
(iv) the extent to which the project has 
a non-Federal financial commitment that 
exceeds the required non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project. 
(6) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall issue regulations on the manner in which the 
Secretary will evaluate and rate the projects based on 
the results of preliminary engineering, project jus-
tification, and the degree of non-Federal financial 
commitment, as required under this subsection. 
(7) PROJECT EVALUATION AND RATING.—A pro-
posed project may advance from preliminary engi-
neering to final design and construction only if the 
Secretary finds that the project meets the require-
ments of this subsection and there is a reasonable like-
lihood that the project will continue to meet such re-
quirements. In making such findings, the Secretary 
shall evaluate and rate the project as ‘‘highly rec-
151
ommended’’, ‘‘recommended’’, or ‘‘not recommended’’ 
based on the results of preliminary engineering, the 
project justification criteria, and the degree of non-
Federal financial commitment, as required under this 
subsection. In rating the projects, the Secretary shall 
provide, in addition to the overall project rating, in-
dividual ratings for each of the criteria established 
under the regulations issued under paragraph (6). 
(g) LETTERS OF INTENT AND FULL FUNDING GRANT 
AGREEMENTS.—
(1) LETTER OF INTENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may issue 
a letter of intent to an applicant announcing an 
intention to obligate, for a project under this sec-
tion, an amount from future available budget 
authority specified in law that is not more than 
the amount stipulated as the financial participa-
tion of the Secretary in the project. 
(B) NOTIFICATION.—At least 60 days before 
issuing a letter under subparagraph (A) or en-
tering into a full funding grant agreement, the 
Secretary shall notify in writing the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate of
152
the proposed letter or agreement. The Secretary 
shall include with the notification a copy of the 
proposed letter or agreement as well as the eval-
uations and ratings for the project. 
(C) NOT AN OBLIGATION.—The issuance of 
a letter is deemed not to be an obligation under 
sections 1108(c) and (d), 1501, and 1502(a) of 
title 31, United States Code, or an administra-
tive commitment. 
(D) OBLIGATION OR COMMITMENT.—An ob-
ligation or administrative commitment may be 
made only when contract authority is allocated 
to a project. 
(2) FULL FUNDING GRANT AGREEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—A project financed under 
this subsection shall be carried out through a full 
funding grant agreement. The Secretary shall 
enter into a full funding grant agreement based 
on the evaluations and ratings required under 
subsection (f)(7). 
(B) TERMS.—If the Secretary makes a full 
funding grant agreement with an applicant, the 
agreement shall—
153
(i) establish the terms of participation 
by the United States Government in a 
project under this section; 
(ii) establish the maximum amount of 
Government financial assistance for the 
project; 
(iii) cover the period of time for com-
pleting the project, including a period ex-
tending beyond the period of an authoriza-
tion; and 
(iv) make timely and efficient manage-
ment of the project easier according to the 
laws of the United States. 
(C) AGREEMENT.—An agreement under this 
paragraph obligates an amount of available 
budget authority specified in law and may in-
clude a commitment, contingent on amounts to 
be specified in law in advance for commitments 
under this paragraph, to obligate an additional 
amount from future available budget authority 
specified in law. The agreement shall state that 
the contingent commitment is not an obligation 
of the Government. Interest and other financing 
costs of efficiently carrying out a part of the 
project within a reasonable time are a cost of
154
carrying out the project under a full funding 
grant agreement, except that eligible costs may 
not be more than the cost of the most favorable 
financing terms reasonably available for the 
project at the time of borrowing. The applicant 
shall certify, in a way satisfactory to the Sec-
retary, that the applicant has shown reasonable 
diligence in seeking the most favorable financing 
terms. 
(3) AMOUNTS.—The total estimated amount of 
future obligations of the Government and contingent 
commitments to incur obligations covered by all out-
standing letters of intent and full funding grant 
agreements may be not more than the greater of the 
amount authorized to carry out this section or an 
amount equivalent to the last 2 fiscal years of funding 
authorized to carry out this section less an amount 
the Secretary reasonably estimates is necessary for 
grants under this section not covered by a letter. The 
total amount covered by new letters and contingent 
commitments included in full funding grant agree-
ments may be not more than a limitation specified in 
law. 
(h) GRANT REQUIREMENTS.—
155
(1) IN GENERAL.—A grant for a project under 
this section shall be subject to all of the requirements 
of title 23, United States Code, and chapter 52 of title 
49, United States Code. 
(2) OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary shall require that all grants under this section 
be subject to all terms, conditions, and requirements 
that the Secretary decides are necessary or appro-
priate for purposes of this section, including require-
ments for the disposition of net increases in value of 
real property resulting from the project assisted under 
this section. 
(i) GOVERNMENT’S SHARE OF PROJECT COST.—Based 
on engineering studies, studies of economic feasibility, and 
information on the expected use of equipment or facilities, 
the Secretary shall estimate the cost of a project receiving 
assistance under this section. A grant for the project is for 
80 percent of the project cost, unless the grant recipient re-
quests a lower grant percentage. A refund or reduction of 
the remainder may be made only if a refund of a propor-
tional amount of the grant of the Government is made at 
the same time. 
(j) FISCAL CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS.—If the Sec-
retary gives priority consideration to financing projects 
that include more than the non-Government share required
156
under subsection (i) the Secretary shall give equal consider-
ation to differences in the fiscal capacity of State and local 
governments. 
(k) REPORTS.—
(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than the first 
Monday in February of each year, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and In-
frastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate a report that includes a proposal on the allo-
cation of amounts to be made available to finance 
grants under this section. 
(2) RECOMMENDATIONS ON FUNDING.—The an-
nual report under this paragraph shall include eval-
uations and ratings, as required under subsection (f). 
The report shall also include recommendations of 
projects for funding based on the evaluations and rat-
ings and on existing commitments and anticipated 
funding levels for the next 3 fiscal years and for the 
next 10 fiscal years based on information currently 
available to the Secretary. 
(l) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds made avail-
able to carry out this section shall be available for obliga-
tion in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; except that
157
such funds shall not be transferable and shall remain avail-
able until expended and the Federal share of the cost of a 
project under this section shall be as provided in this sec-
tion. 
SEC. 1305. DEDICATED TRUCK LANES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish and 
implement a pilot program to make allocations to States 
for the construction of projects that separate commercial 
truck traffic from other motor vehicle traffic. A State must 
submit an application to the Secretary in order to receive 
an allocation under this section. 
(b) SELECTION PROCESS.—
(1) PRIORITY.—In the selection process under 
this section, the Secretary shall give priority to 
projects that provide additional capacity. 
(2) SELECTION
FACTORS.—In making alloca-
tions under this section, the Secretary shall consider 
the following factors: 
(A) The extent to which the project will im-
prove the safe and efficient movement of freight. 
(B) The extent to which the project provides 
positive separation of commercial trucks from 
other motor vehicle traffic. 
(C) The extent to which the project connects 
an intermodal freight facility or an inter-
158
national port of entry to the Dwight D. Eisen-
hower National System of Interstate and Defense 
Highways by providing limited access lanes that 
allow commercial truck traffic to enter the Inter-
state System at the posted speed limit. 
(D) The extent to which the project will re-
move truck traffic from surface streets. 
(E) The extent to which travel time is ex-
pected to be reduced as a result of the proposed 
project. 
(F) The extent of leveraging of Federal 
funds provided to carry out this section, includ-
ing—
(i) use of innovative financing; 
(ii) combination with funding pro-
vided under other sections of this Act and 
title 23, United States Code; and 
(iii) combination with other sources of 
Federal, State, local, or private funding. 
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of a project under this section shall be determined in accord-
ance with section 120(b) of title 23, United States Code. 
(d) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Except as provided 
in subsection (d), funds made available by section 
1101(a)(22) of this Act to carry out this section shall be
159
available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds 
were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States 
Code. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section the following defini-
tions apply: 
(1) COMMERCIAL TRUCK.—The term ‘‘commer-
cial truck’’ means a self-propelled or towed vehicle 
used on highways in commerce principally to trans-
port cargo if the vehicle has a gross vehicle weight 
rating or gross vehicle weight of at least 10,001 
pounds, whichever is greater. 
(2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the meaning 
such term has under section 101 of title 23, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 1306. TRUCK PARKING FACILITIES. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—In cooperation with appro-
priate State, regional, and local governments, the Secretary 
shall establish a pilot program to address the shortage of 
long-term parking for commercial motor vehicles on the Na-
tional Highway System. 
(b) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall allocate 
funds made available to carry out this section among 
States, metropolitan planning organizations, and 
local governments.
160
(2) APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible for an alloca-
tion under this section, a State, metropolitan plan-
ning organization, or local government shall submit 
to the Secretary an application at such time and con-
taining such information as the Secretary may re-
quire. 
(3) 
ELIGIBLE
PROJECTS.—Funds 
allocated 
under this subsection shall be used by the recipient for 
projects described in an application approved by the 
Secretary. Such projects shall serve the National 
Highway System and may include the following: 
(A) Constructing safety rest areas, as de-
fined in section 120(c) of title 23, United States 
Code, that include parking for commercial motor 
vehicles. 
(B) Constructing commercial motor vehicle 
parking facilities adjacent to commercial truck 
stops and travel plazas. 
(C) Opening existing facilities to commer-
cial motor vehicle parking, including inspection 
and weigh stations and park-and-ride facilities. 
(D) Promoting the availability of publicly 
or privately provided commercial motor vehicle 
parking on the National Highway System using
161
intelligent transportation systems and other 
means. 
(E) Constructing turnouts along the Na-
tional Highway System for commercial motor 
vehicles. 
(F) Making capital improvements to public 
commercial motor vehicle parking facilities cur-
rently closed on a seasonal basis to allow the fa-
cilities to remain open year-round. 
(G) Improving the geometric design of 
interchanges on the National Highway System to 
improve access to commercial motor vehicle 
parking facilities. 
(4) PRIORITY.—In allocating funds made avail-
able to carry out this section, the Secretary shall give 
priority to applicants that—
(A) demonstrate a severe shortage of com-
mercial motor vehicle parking capacity in the 
corridor to be addressed; 
(B) have consulted with affected State and 
local governments, community groups, private 
providers of commercial motor vehicle parking, 
and motorist and trucking organizations; and
162
(C) demonstrate that their proposed projects 
are likely to have positive effects on highway 
safety, traffic congestion, or air quality. 
(c) FUNDING.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated from the Highway Trust Fund (other than 
the Mass Transit Account) to carry out this section 
$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009. 
(2) CONTRACT
AUTHORITY.—Funds authorized 
under this subsection shall be available for obligation 
in the same manner as if the funds were apportioned 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code. 
(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 5 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot 
program. 
(e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of a project carried out using amounts made available 
under this section shall be determined in accordance with 
sections 120(b) and 120(c) of title 23, United States Code. 
(f) APPLICABILITY
OF TITLE 23.—Notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, projects funded under this sec-
tion shall be treated as projects on a Federal-aid system 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.
163
Subtitle D—Highway Safety 
SEC. 1401. HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. 
(a) SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEFINED.—Sec-
tion 101(a)(30) of title 23, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting ‘‘installs fluorescent, yellow-green signs at pe-
destrian or bicycle crossings or school zones,’’ after ‘‘call 
boxes,’’. 
(b) OPERATION LIFESAVER.—Section 104(d)(1) of 
such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(3) of this section’’ 
and inserting ‘‘section 130(f)’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘$500,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$600,000’’. 
(c) RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSING HAZARD ELIMI-
NATION IN HIGH SPEED RAIL CORRIDORS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(d)(2) of such title 
is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (A) by striking 
‘‘$5,250,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500,000 for each 
of fiscal years 2004 and 2005, $10,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007, and 
$15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 and 
2009’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (E)—
164
(i) by striking ‘‘Not less than $250,000 
of such set-aside’’ and inserting ‘‘Of such 
set-aside, not less than $875,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2004 and 2005, $1,500,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007, and 
$2,750,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 and 
2009’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘per fiscal year’’. 
(2) DESIGNATION OF CORRIDORS.—Of the rail 
corridors selected by the Secretary in accordance with 
section 104(d)(2) of title 23, United States Code—
(A) the Northern New England High Speed 
Rail Corridor is expanded to include the train 
routes from Boston, Massachusetts, to Albany, 
New York, and from Springfield, Massachusetts, 
to New Haven, Connecticut; and 
(B) the South Central Corridor is expanded 
to include the train route from Killeen, Texas, to 
Houston, Texas, via Bryan-College Station. 
(d) RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS.—
(1) FUNDS FOR PROTECTIVE DEVICES.—Section 
130(e) of such title is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘At’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—At’’; and
165
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE.—If a State demonstrates to 
the satisfaction of the Secretary that the State has 
met all its needs for installation of protective devices 
at railway-highway crossings, the State may use 
funds made available by this subsection for other pur-
poses by this section.’’. 
(2) APPORTIONMENT.—Section 130(f) of such 
title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(f) APPORTIONMENT.—
‘‘(1) FORMULA.—Fifty percent of the funds au-
thorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
shall be apportioned to the States in accordance with 
the formula set forth in section 104(b)(3)(A), and 50 
percent of such funds shall be apportioned to the 
States in the ratio that total public railway-highway 
crossings in each State bears to the total of such cross-
ings in all States. 
‘‘(2) 
MINIMUM
APPORTIONMENT.—Notwith-
standing paragraph (1), each State shall receive a 
minimum of 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the funds apportioned 
under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(3) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share pay-
able on account of any project financed with funds
166
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this sec-
tion shall be 90 percent of the cost thereof.’’. 
(3) BIENNIAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The third 
sentence of section 130(g) of such title is amended by 
striking ‘‘not later than April 1 of each year,’’ and 
inserting ‘‘, not later than April 1, 2005, and every 
2 years thereafter,’’. 
(4) EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS.—Section 130 of 
such title is further amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(k) EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS.—Not more than 2 per-
cent of funds apportioned to a State to carry out this sec-
tion may be used by the State for compilation and analysis 
of data in support of activities carried out under subsection 
(g).’’. 
(e) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 133(d) of such title is 
amended—
(A) by striking paragraph (1); and 
(B) 
by 
redesignating 
paragraphs 
(2) 
through (5) as paragraphs (1) through (4), re-
spectively; and 
(C) in paragraph (2) (as so redesignated)—
(i) in subparagraph (A) by striking 
‘‘80 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘90 percent’’;
167
(ii) in subparagraph (B) by striking 
‘‘tobe’’ and inserting ‘‘to be’’; and 
(iii) in subparagraph (D) by adding a 
period at the end. 
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) 
SECTION
133.—Section 
133(e) 
is 
amended by striking ‘‘(d)(2)’’ and inserting 
‘‘(d)(1)’’ in each of paragraphs (3)(B)(i), (5)(A), 
and (5)(B). 
(B) SECTION 126.—Section 126(b) of such 
title is amended—
(i) by striking ‘‘to the last sentence of 
section 133(d)(1) or’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘section 133(d)(3)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘section 133(d)(2)’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘or 133(d)(2)’’. 
(f) HAZARD ELIMINATION PROGRAM.—
(1) PURPOSES.—Section 152(a)(1) of such title 
is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘bicyclists,’’; 
and 
(B) by inserting after ‘‘pedestrians,’’ the fol-
lowing: ‘‘and the disabled, identify roadway safe-
ty improvement needs for such locations, sec-
tions, and elements,’’.
168
(2) HAZARDS.—Section 152(a)(2)(A) of such 
title is amended by inserting ‘‘the disabled,’’ after 
‘‘pedestrians,’’. 
(3) APPROVAL OF PROJECTS.—Section 152(b) of 
such title is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ‘‘that reduces the likelihood of 
crashes involving road departures, intersections, pe-
destrians, the disabled, bicyclists, older drivers, or 
construction work zones’’. 
(4) EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS.—Section 152(c) of 
such title is amended—
(A) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘or’’ at 
the end; 
(B) in paragraph (3) by striking the period 
at the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) police assistance for traffic and speed man-
agement in construction work zones; 
‘‘(5) installation of barriers between construction 
work zones and traffic lanes for the safety of motorists 
and workers; and 
‘‘(6) compilation and analysis of data under 
subsections (f) and (g) if the funds used for this pur-
pose by a State do not exceed 2 percent of the amount 
apportioned to such State to carry out this section.’’.
169
(5) APPORTIONMENT.—Section 152(d) of such 
title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(d) APPORTIONMENT.—
‘‘(1) FORMULA.—Funds authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this section shall be apportioned 
to the States in accordance with the formula set forth 
in section 104(b)(3)(A). 
‘‘(2) 
MINIMUM
APPORTIONMENT.—Notwith-
standing paragraph (1), each State shall receive a 
minimum of 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the funds apportioned 
under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(3) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share pay-
able on account of any project financed with funds 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this sec-
tion shall be 90 percent of the cost thereof.’’. 
(6) BIENNIAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 152 of such title 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(i) BIENNIAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 
2 years after the date of enactment of this subsection, and 
every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environ-
ment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the results
170
of the program under this section. The report shall include, 
at a minimum, the following: 
‘‘(1) A summary of State projects completed 
under this section categorized by the types of hazards 
and a statement of the cost of such projects. 
‘‘(2) An analysis of the effectiveness of such cat-
egories of projects in reducing the number and sever-
ity of crashes at high hazard locations. 
‘‘(3) An assessment of the adequacy of authorized 
funding for the program and State use of such fund-
ing to address the national need for such projects. 
‘‘(4) Recommendations for funding and program 
improvements to reduce the number of high hazard lo-
cations. 
‘‘(5) An analysis and evaluation of each State 
program, an identification of any State found not to 
be in compliance with the schedule of improvements 
required by subsection (a), and recommendations for 
future implementation of the hazard elimination pro-
gram.’’. 
(B) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section 
152(g) of such title is amended by striking the 
third sentence through the last sentence.
171
(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
sections (d), (e), and (f) shall take effect on September 30, 
2004. 
SEC. 1402. WORKER INJURY PREVENTION AND FREE FLOW 
OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. 
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall issue regulations to decrease 
the likelihood of worker injury and maintain the free flow 
of vehicular traffic by requiring workers whose duties place 
them on or in close proximity to a Federal-aid highway 
(as defined in section 101 of title 23, United States Code) 
to wear high visibility garments. Such regulations may also 
require such other worker-safety measures for workers with 
those duties as the Secretary determines appropriate. 
SEC. 1403. HIGH RISK RURAL ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENT 
PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish 
and implement a high risk rural road safety improvement 
program in accordance with this section. 
(b) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), a State may obligate funds apportioned to 
it under this section only for construction and oper-
ational improvement projects on high risk rural roads
172
and only if the primary purpose of the project is to 
improve highway safety on a high risk rural road. 
(2) SPECIAL RULE.—A State may use funds ap-
portioned to it under this section for any project ap-
proved by the Secretary under section 152 of title 23, 
United States Code, if the State certifies to the Sec-
retary that it has no projects described in paragraph 
(1). 
(c) STATE ALLOCATION SYSTEM.—Each State shall es-
tablish a system for allocating funds apportioned to it 
under this section among projects eligible for assistance 
under this section that have the highest benefits to highway 
safety. Such system may include a safety management sys-
tem established by the State under section 303 of title 23, 
United States Code, or a survey established pursuant to sec-
tion 152(a) of such title. 
(d) APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS.—On October 1 of 
each fiscal year, the Secretary shall apportion among States 
sums authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
for such fiscal year as follows: 
(1) 1⁄3 in the ratio that—
(A) each State’s public road lane mileage 
for rural minor collectors and rural local roads; 
bears to
173
(B) the total public road lane mileage for 
rural minor collectors and rural local roads of 
all States. 
(2) 1⁄3 in the ratio that—
(A) the population of areas other than ur-
banized areas in each State, as shown by the 
most recent Government decennial census of pop-
ulation; bears to 
(B) the population of all areas other than 
urbanized areas in the United States, as shown 
by that census. 
(3) 1⁄3 in the ratio that—
(A) the total vehicle miles traveled on public 
roads in each State; bears to 
(B) the total number of vehicle miles trav-
eled on public roads in all States. 
(e) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds made avail-
able to carry out this section shall be available for obliga-
tion in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned 
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; except that 
such funds shall not be transferable and shall remain avail-
able until expended and the Federal share of the cost of a 
project under this section shall be 80 percent. Notwith-
standing any other provision of law, projects assisted under
174
this section shall be treated as projects on a Federal-aid 
system under such chapter. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defini-
tions apply: 
(1) HIGH RISK RURAL ROAD.—The term ‘‘high 
risk rural road’’ means any roadway functionally 
classified as a rural major or minor collector or a 
rural local road—
(A) on which the accident rate for fatalities 
and incapacitating injuries exceeds the statewide 
average for these functional classes of roadway; 
or 
(B) which will likely have increases in traf-
fic volume that are likely to create an accident 
rate for fatalities and incapacitating injuries 
that exceeds the statewide average for these func-
tional classes of roadway. 
(2) STATE AND URBANIZED AREA.—The terms 
‘‘State’’ and ‘‘urbanized area’’ have the meaning such 
terms have under section 101(a) of title 23, United 
States Code.
175
SEC. 1404. TRANSFERS OF APPORTIONMENTS TO SAFETY 
PROGRAMS. 
(a) USE OF SAFETY BELTS AND MOTORCYCLE HEL-
METS.—Section 153(h) of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in the paragraph heading by striking 
‘‘THEREAFTER.—’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘FISCAL 
YEARS 1995–2003.—’’; and 
(B) by inserting ‘‘and ending before October 
1, 2003,’’ after ‘‘September 30, 1994,’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (5) 
as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) FISCAL YEAR 2004 AND THEREAFTER.—On 
October 1, 2003, and each October 1 thereafter, if a 
State does not have in effect a law described in sub-
section (a)(2), the Secretary shall transfer from the 
funds apportioned to the State on that date under 
each of subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of section 
104 to the apportionment of the State under section 
402 an amount equal to 3 percent of the funds appor-
tioned to the State under such subsections for fiscal 
year 2003.’’; and 
(4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated)—
176
(A) by striking ‘‘which is determined by 
multiplying’’ and inserting ‘‘which, for fiscal 
year 2004 and each fiscal year thereafter, is de-
termined by multiplying’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘such 
fiscal year’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘fiscal year 2003’’. 
(b) 
OPEN
CONTAINER
REQUIREMENTS.—Section 
154(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in the paragraph heading by striking 
‘‘AND FISCAL YEARS THEREAFTER’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘and each October 1 there-
after,’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (7) 
as paragraphs (4) through (8), respectively; 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) FISCAL YEAR 2004 AND THEREAFTER.—On 
October 1, 2003, and each October 1 thereafter, if a 
State has not enacted or is not enforcing an open con-
tainer law described in subsection (b), the Secretary 
shall transfer from the funds apportioned to the State 
on that date under each of paragraphs (1), (3), and 
(4) of section 104(b) an amount equal to 3 percent of
177
the funds apportioned to the State under such para-
graphs for fiscal year 2003 to be used or directed as 
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph 
(1).’’; 
(4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated) by 
striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 
(4)’’; 
(5) in paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) (as so redes-
ignated) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), or (3)’’; and 
(6) in paragraph (7)(B) (as so redesignated)—
(A) by striking ‘‘The amount’’ and inserting 
‘‘For fiscal year 2004 and each fiscal year there-
after, the amount’’; and 
(B) in subclauses (I) and (II) of clause (ii) 
by striking ‘‘the fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘fis-
cal year 2003’’. 
(c) MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN REPEAT OF-
FENDERS.—Section 164(b) of title 23, United States Code, 
is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in the paragraph heading by striking 
‘‘AND FISCAL YEARS THEREAFTER’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘and each October 1 there-
after,’’;
178
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (7) 
as paragraphs (4) through (8), respectively; 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) FISCAL YEAR 2004 AND THEREAFTER.—On 
October 1, 2003, and each October 1 thereafter, if a 
State has not enacted or is not enforcing a repeat in-
toxicated driver law, the Secretary shall transfer from 
the funds apportioned to the State on that date under 
each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section 104(b) 
an amount equal to 3 percent of the funds appor-
tioned to the State under such paragraphs for fiscal 
year 2003 to be used or directed as described in sub-
paragraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1).’’; 
(4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated) by 
striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 
(4)’’; 
(5) in paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) (as so redes-
ignated) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), or (3)’’; and 
(6) in paragraph (7)(B) (as so redesignated)—
(A) by striking ‘‘The amount’’ and inserting 
‘‘For fiscal year 2004 and each fiscal year there-
after, the amount’’; and
179
(B) in subclauses (I) and (II) of clause (ii) 
by striking ‘‘the fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘fis-
cal year 2003’’. 
SEC. 1405. SAFETY INCENTIVE GRANTS FOR USE OF SEAT 
BELTS. 
Section 157(g)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘each 
of fiscal years 2003 and 2004’’. 
SEC. 1406. SAFETY INCENTIVES TO PREVENT OPERATION 
OF MOTOR VEHICLES BY INTOXICATED PER-
SONS. 
(a) CODIFICATION OF PENALTY.—Section 163 of title 
23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection 
(f); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(e) PENALTY.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—On October 1, 2003, and Oc-
tober 1 of each fiscal year thereafter, if a State has 
not enacted or is not enforcing a law described in 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall withhold from 
amounts apportioned to the State on that date under 
each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section 104(b)
180
an amount equal to the amount specified in para-
graph (2). 
‘‘(2) AMOUNT TO BE WITHHELD.—If a State is 
subject to a penalty under paragraph (1), the Sec-
retary shall withhold for a fiscal year from the appor-
tionments of the State described in paragraph (1) an 
amount equal to a percentage of the funds appor-
tioned to the State under paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) 
of section 104(b) for fiscal year 2003. The percentage 
shall be as follows: 
‘‘(A) For fiscal year 2004, 2 percent. 
‘‘(B) For fiscal year 2005, 4 percent. 
‘‘(C) For fiscal year 2006, 6 percent. 
‘‘(D) For fiscal year 2007, and each fiscal 
year thereafter, 8 percent. 
‘‘(3) FAILURE TO COMPLY.—If, within 4 years 
from the date that an apportionment for a State is 
withheld in accordance with this subsection, the Sec-
retary determines that the State has enacted and is 
enforcing a law described in subsection (a), the ap-
portionment of the State shall be increased by an 
amount equal to the amount withheld. If, at the end 
of such 4-year period, any State has not enacted or 
is not enforcing a law described in subsection (a) any 
amounts so withheld from such State shall lapse.’’.
181
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 
163(f)(1) of such title, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) 
of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2003’’ 
and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2003 and 2004’’. 
(c) REPEAL.—Section 351 of the Department of Trans-
portation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 
(23 U.S.C. 163 note; 114 Stat. 1356A–34) is repealed. 
SEC. 1407. REPEAT OFFENDERS FOR DRIVING WHILE IN-
TOXICATED. 
Section 164(a)(5)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(A) receive (i) a driver’s license suspension 
for not less than 1 year, or (ii) a combination 
of suspension of all driving privileges of an indi-
vidual for the first 45 days of the suspension pe-
riod followed by a reinstatement of limited driv-
ing privileges for the propose of getting to and 
from work, school, or an alcohol treatment pro-
gram if an ignition interlock device is installed 
on each of the motor vehicles owned or operated, 
or both, by the individual;’’.
182
Subtitle E—Construction and 
Contract Efficiencies 
SEC. 1501. DESIGN–BUILD. 
(a) QUALIFIED PROJECTS.—Section 112(b)(3)(C) of 
title 23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(C) QUALIFIED
PROJECTS.—A qualified 
project referred to in subparagraph (A) is a 
project under this chapter for which the Sec-
retary has approved the use of design-build con-
tracting under criteria specified in regulations 
issued by the Secretary.’’. 
(b) 
EXPERIMENTAL
PROCUREMENT.—Section 
112(b)(3) of such title is further amended—
(1) by redesigning subparagraph (D) as sub-
paragraph (G); and 
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(D) EXPERIMENTAL
PROCUREMENT.—As 
part of any experimental program carried out 
under this section, the Secretary shall evaluate 
the use of procurement procedures under this 
paragraph where subjective evaluation criteria 
account for the majority of the selection deter-
mination.
183
‘‘(E) LIMITATION
ON
STATUTORY
CON-
STRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as effecting the authority to carry out 
any experimental program concerning design-
build contracting that is being carried out by the 
Secretary on the date of enactment of this sub-
paragraph. 
‘‘(F) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after 
the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the 
Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on 
the effectiveness of design-build contracting pro-
cedures in which the majority of the selection de-
terminations are made based on subjective cri-
teria in accordance with subparagraph (D). ’’. 
SEC. 1502. WARRANTY HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 
PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish and 
implement a pilot program designed to encourage States 
to incorporate warranties in the letting of contracts for 
highway construction projects. 
(b) MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROJECTS.—The Secretary 
may allow not more than 15 projects a year to be carried 
out under the pilot program.
184
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 
of a project under the pilot program may not exceed 90 
percent. 
(d) MINIMUM PROJECT COST.—The estimated total 
cost of a project to be carried out under the pilot program 
must be greater than $15,000,000. 
(e) SELECTION PROCESS.—In the selection process for 
the pilot program, the Secretary shall select, to the extent 
possible, projects from several different regions of the United 
States in order to demonstrate the effects that different cli-
mates and traffic patterns have on warranty highway con-
struction projects. 
(f) RULEMAKING.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
issue a rule to implement the pilot program. The rule 
shall include the following factors for eligibility of a 
highway construction project to be included in the 
program: 
(A) A requirement that the contract for the 
project must include a long-term limited war-
ranty that is of a duration sufficient to ensure 
that—
(i) the cost to the State of the project 
that will be carried out is less than the esti-
186
(iv) performance criteria to be met to 
determine if maintenance is required. 
(2) FACTORS TO CONSIDER.—In issuing the rule, 
the Secretary may consider the following factors as 
requirements for the warranty contract for eligibility 
under the pilot program: 
(A) A plan to account for inflation during 
the warranty period. 
(B) The frequency of performance assess-
ments performed. 
(C) The response time for repairs. 
(D) A plan for emergency repairs. 
(E) Clearly set out limits of liability under 
the warranty, if any. 
(F) Dispute resolution provisions. 
(G) A severability provision. 
(H) Other provisions the Secretary con-
siders necessary for carrying out the program. 
(g) SAVINGS.—Section 112 of title 23, United States 
Code, shall apply to the projects carried out under this sec-
tion unless the Secretary determines that applying such sec-
tion to such projects is inconsistent with the provisions of 
this section. 
(h) REPORTS.—Not later than 5 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act and every year thereafter, the Sec-
187
retary shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
a report outlining activities carried out under the program 
and the results of the program. 
SEC. 1503. PRIVATE INVESTMENT STUDY. 
(a) STUDY.—Not later than 6 months after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into an 
agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to con-
duct a comprehensive study of private investment in surface 
transportation infrastructure. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE EVALUATED.—Under the agree-
ment, the National Academy of Sciences shall evaluate the 
advantages and disadvantages of private investment in sur-
face transportation infrastructure and the impact of such 
investment on the ability of State and local authorities to 
use innovative financing, including—
(1) preconstruction funding requirements; 
(2) integration of private investment in the 
transportation planning process; 
(3) use of toll revenues by State and local au-
thorities; 
(4) use of toll credits by State and local authori-
ties;
188
(5) requirements for debt financing instruments, 
reimbursable expenses, and conditions on payments; 
(6) limitation on fees charged at federally funded 
fringe and corridor parking facilities; 
(7) revenues needed to provide a reasonable rate 
of return to private investors; 
(8) costs to users of facilities due to imposition 
of tolls; 
(9) sales-in-lease-out arrangement of transpor-
tation assets; and 
(10) such other matters as the Secretary con-
siders appropriate. 
(c) REPORT.—
(1) TO SECRETARY.—Under the agreement, the 
National Academy of Sciences shall submit to the Sec-
retary a report on the results of the study by such 
date as the Secretary may require. 
(2) TO CONGRESS.—Not later than January 1, 
2006, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate a copy of the report 
of the National Academy of Sciences, together with 
such recommendations as the Secretary considers ap-
propriate.
189
SEC. 1504. HIGHWAYS FOR LIFE PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish 
and implement a pilot program to be known as the 
‘‘Highways for LIFE pilot program’’. 
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the pilot program 
shall be to advance longer-lasting highways using in-
novative technologies and practices to accomplish the 
fast construction of efficient and safe highways and 
bridges. 
(3) OBJECTIVES.—Under the pilot program, the 
Secretary shall provide leadership and incentives to 
demonstrate and promote state-of-the-art technologies, 
elevated performance standards, and new business 
practices in the highway construction process that re-
sult in improved safety, faster construction, reduced 
congestion from construction, and improved quality 
and user satisfaction. 
(b) PROJECTS.—
(1) APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible to participate 
in the pilot program, a State shall submit to the Sec-
retary an application that is in such form and con-
tains such information as the Secretary requires. 
Each application shall contain a description of pro-
posed projects to be carried by the State under the 
pilot program.
190
(2) ELIGIBILITY.—A proposed project shall be el-
igible for assistance under the pilot program if the 
project—
(A) constructs, reconstructs, or rehabilitates 
a route or connection on a Federal-aid highway 
eligible for assistance under chapter 1 of title 23, 
United States Code; 
(B) uses innovative technologies, manufac-
turing processes, financing, or contracting meth-
ods that improve safety, reduce congestion due to 
construction, and improve quality; and 
(C) meets additional criteria as determined 
by the Secretary. 
(3) PROJECT
PROPOSAL.—A project proposal 
submitted under paragraph (1) shall contain—
(A) an identification and description of the 
projects to be delivered; 
(B) a description of how the projects will 
result in improved safety, faster construction, re-
duced congestion due to construction, user satis-
faction, and improved quality; 
(C) a description of the innovative tech-
nologies, manufacturing processes, financing, 
and contracting methods that will be used for the 
proposed projects; and
191
(D) such other information as the Secretary 
may require. 
(4) SELECTION CRITERIA.—In selecting projects 
for approval under this section, the Secretary shall 
ensure that the projects provide an evaluation of a 
broad range of technologies in a wide variety of 
project types and shall give priority to the projects 
that—
(A) address achieving the Highways for 
LIFE performance standards for quality, safety, 
and speed of construction; 
(B) deliver and deploy innovative tech-
nologies, manufacturing processes, financing, 
contracting practices, and performance measures 
that will demonstrate substantial improvements 
in safety, congestion, quality, and cost-effective-
ness; 
(C) include innovation that will lead to 
change in the administration of the State’s 
transportation program to more quickly con-
struct long-lasting, high-quality, cost-effective 
projects that improve safety and reduce conges-
tion;
192
(D) are or will be ready for construction 
within 12 months of approval of the project pro-
posal; and 
(E) meet such other criteria as the Sec-
retary determines appropriate. 
(5) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—
(A) FUNDS
FOR
HIGHWAYS
FOR
LIFE 
PROJECTS.—Out of amounts made available to 
carry out this section for a fiscal year, the Sec-
retary may allocate to a State up to 20 percent, 
but not more than $15,000,000, of the total cost 
of a project approved under this section. Not-
withstanding any other provision of law, funds 
allocated to a State under this subparagraph 
may be applied to the non-Federal share of the 
cost of construction of a project under title 23, 
United States Code. 
(B) USE OF APPORTIONED FUNDS.—A State 
may obligate not more than 10 percent of the 
amount apportioned to the State under 1 or 
more of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) of sec-
tion 104(b) of title 23, United States Code, for 
a fiscal year for projects approved under this sec-
tion.
193
(C) INCREASED
FEDERAL
SHARE.—Not-
withstanding sections 120 and 129 of title 23, 
United States Code, the Federal share payable on 
account of any project constructed with Federal 
funds allocated under this section, or appor-
tioned under section 104(b) of such title, to a 
State under such title and approved under this 
section may amount to 100 percent of the cost of 
construction of such project. 
(D) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUC-
TION.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), 
nothing in this subsection shall be construed as 
altering or otherwise affecting the applicability 
of the requirements of chapter 1 of title 23, 
United States Code (including requirements re-
lating to the eligibility of a project for assistance 
under the program and the location of the 
project), to amounts apportioned to a State for 
a program under section 104(b) that are obli-
gated by the State for projects approved under 
this subsection. 
(6) PROJECT SELECTIONS.—In the period of fis-
cal years 2004 through 2009, the Secretary shall ap-
prove at least one project in each State for participa-
tion in the pilot program and for financial assistance
194
under paragraph (5) if the State submits an applica-
tion and the project meets the eligibility requirements 
and selection criteria under this subsection. 
(c) TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary may make 
grants or enter into cooperative agreements or other 
transactions to foster the development, improvement, 
and creation of innovative technologies and facilities 
to improve safety, enhance the speed of highway con-
struction, and improve the quality and durability of 
highways. 
(2) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 
cost of an activity carried out under this subsection 
shall not exceed 80 percent. 
(d) TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND INFORMATION DIS-
SEMINATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
Highways for LIFE technology transfer program. 
(2) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—The Sec-
retary shall ensure that the information and tech-
nology used, developed, or deployed under this sub-
section is made available to the transportation com-
munity and the public. 
(e) STAKEHOLDER INPUT AND INVOLVEMENT.—The 
Secretary shall establish a process for stakeholder input and
195
involvement in the development, implementation, and eval-
uation of the Highways for LIFE pilot program. The proc-
ess may include participation by representatives of State 
departments of transportation and other interested persons. 
(f) PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION.—The 
Secretary shall monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of 
any activity carried out under this section. 
(g) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Funds authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section shall be available for 
obligation in the same manner as if the funds were appor-
tioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code. 
(h) STATE
DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘State’’ has the meaning such term has under section 
101(a) of title 23, United States Code. 
Subtitle F—Finance 
SEC. 1601. TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE 
AND INNOVATION ACT. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 181 of title 23, United 
States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (3)—
(A) by striking ‘‘category’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘offered into the capital 
markets’’; 
(2) by striking paragraph (7);
196
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (8) through (15) 
as paragraphs (7) through (14), respectively; 
(4) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (8)(B) (as so redesignated) and inserting a 
semicolon; and 
(5) in paragraph (10) (as so redesignated) by 
striking ‘‘bond’’ and inserting ‘‘credit’’. 
(b) DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 182(a) 
of such title is amended—
(1) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and in-
serting the following: 
‘‘(1) INCLUSION IN TRANSPORTATION PLANS AND 
PROGRAMS.—The project shall satisfy the applicable 
planning and programming requirements of sections 
134 and 135 at such time as an agreement to make 
available a Federal credit instrument is entered into 
under this subchapter. 
‘‘(2) APPLICATION.—A State, a local government, 
public authority, public-private partnership, or any 
other legal entity undertaking the project and author-
ized by the Secretary, shall submit a project applica-
tion to the Secretary.’’; 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(3)(A)(i) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’;
197
(3) 
in 
paragraph 
(3)(B) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000’’; and 
(4) in paragraph (4)—
(A) by striking ‘‘Project financing’’ and in-
serting ‘‘The Federal credit instrument’’; and 
(B) by inserting before the period at the end 
‘‘that also secure the project obligations’’. 
(c) PROJECT SELECTION.—Section 182(b) of such title 
is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘criteria’’ the 
second place it appears and inserting ‘‘requirements’’; 
and 
(2) in paragraph (2)(B) by inserting ‘‘, which 
may be the Federal credit instrument,’’ after ‘‘obliga-
tions’’. 
(d) SECURED LOANS.—
(1) AGREEMENTS.—Section 183(a)(1) of such 
title is amended—
(A) in each of subparagraphs (A) and (B) 
by inserting ‘‘of any project selected under sec-
tion 602’’ after ‘‘costs’’; and 
(B) by striking the semicolon at the end of 
subparagraph (B) and all that follows through 
‘‘under section 602’’.
198
(2) 
INVESTMENT-GRADE
RATING
REQUIRE-
MENT.—Section 183(a)(4) of such title is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘The funding’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘The execution’’; and 
(B) by striking the first comma and all that 
follows through ‘‘1 rating agency’’. 
(3) TERMS AND LIMITATIONS.—Section 183(b) of 
such title is amended—
(A) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘the less-
er of’’ after ‘‘exceed’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘or the 
amount of the senior project obligations’’ after 
‘‘costs’’; 
(C) in paragraph (3)(A)(i) by inserting 
‘‘that also secure the senior project obligations’’ 
after ‘‘sources’’; and 
(D) in paragraph (4) by striking ‘‘market-
able’’. 
(4) REPAYMENT.—Section 183(c) is amended—
(A) by striking paragraph (3); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 
(5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 
(e) LINES OF CREDIT.—
(1) TERMS AND LIMITATIONS.—Section 184(b) of 
such title is amended—
199
(A) in paragraph (3)—
(i) by striking the first comma; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘any debt service re-
serve fund, and any other available reserve’’ 
and inserting ‘‘but not including reasonably 
required financing reserves’’; 
(B) in paragraph (4)—
(i) by striking ‘‘marketable’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘on which’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘of execution of’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘is obligated’’ and in-
serting ‘‘agreement’’; and 
(C) in paragraph (5)(A)(i) by inserting 
‘‘that also secure the senior project obligations’’ 
after ‘‘sources’’; and 
(2) REPAYMENT.—Section 184(c) of such title is 
amended—
(A) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by striking ‘‘scheduled’’; 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘be scheduled to’’ after 
‘‘shall’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘be fully repaid, with 
interest,’’ and inserting ‘‘conclude, with full 
repayment of principal and interest,’’; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (3).
200
(f) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.—Section 185 of such 
title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 185. Program administration 
‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall establish a 
uniform system to service the Federal credit instrument 
made available under this chapter. 
‘‘(b) FEES.—The Secretary may establish fees at a 
level to cover all or a portion of the costs to the Federal 
Government of servicing the Federal credit instrument. 
‘‘(c) SERVICES.—The Secretary may identify a finan-
cial entity to assist the Secretary in servicing a Federal 
credit instrument. The services—
‘‘(1) shall act as the agent for the Secretary; and 
‘‘(2) shall receive a servicing fee, subject to ap-
proval by the Secretary. 
‘‘(d) ASSISTANCE FROM EXPERT FIRMS.—The Sec-
retary may retain the services of one or more expert firms, 
including counsel, in the field of municipal and project fi-
nance to assist in the underwriting and servicing of Federal 
credit instruments.’’. 
(g) FUNDING.—Section 188 of such title is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 188. Funding 
‘‘(a) FUNDING.—
201
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 
appropriated from the Highway Trust Fund (other 
than the Mass Transit Account) $130,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2004 and $140,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2005 through 2009 to carry out this chapter. 
‘‘(2) 
ADMINISTRATIVE
COSTS.—From 
funds 
made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
may use, for the administration of this subchapter, 
not more than $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
2004 through 2009. 
‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts made available 
under paragraph (1) shall remain available until ex-
pended. 
‘‘(b) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, approval by the Secretary of a Fed-
eral credit instrument that uses funds made available 
under this chapter shall be deemed to be acceptance 
by the United States of a contractual obligation to 
fund the Federal credit instrument. 
‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts authorized under 
this section for a fiscal year shall be available for ob-
ligation on October 1 of the fiscal year. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATIONS ON CREDIT AMOUNTS.—For each of 
fiscal years 2004 through 2009, principal amounts of Fed-
202
eral credit instruments made available under this chapter 
shall be limited to $2,600,000,000.’’. 
SEC. 1602. STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANKS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 189 of title 23, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 189. State infrastructure bank program 
‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
‘‘(1) CAPITAL
PROJECT.—The term ‘capital 
project’ has the meaning such term has under section 
5302 of title 49, United States Code. 
‘‘(2) OTHER FORMS OF CREDIT ASSISTANCE.—
The term ‘other forms of credit assistance’ includes 
any use of funds in an infrastructure bank—
‘‘(A) to provide credit enhancements; 
‘‘(B) to serve as a capital reserve for bond 
or debt instrument financing; 
‘‘(C) to subsidize interest rates; 
‘‘(D) to insure or guarantee letters of credit 
and credit instruments against credit risk of 
loss; 
‘‘(E) to finance purchase and lease agree-
ments with respect to transit projects; 
‘‘(F) to provide bond or debt financing in-
strument security; and
203
‘‘(G) to provide other forms of debt financ-
ing and methods of leveraging funds that are ap-
proved by the Secretary and that relate to the 
project with respect to which such assistance is 
being provided. 
‘‘(3) STATE.—The term ‘State’ has the meaning 
such term has under section 401 of this title. 
‘‘(4) CAPITALIZATION.—The term ‘capitalization’ 
means the process used for depositing funds as initial 
capital into a State infrastructure bank to establish 
the infrastructure bank. 
‘‘(5) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—The term ‘co-
operative agreement’ means written consent between a 
State and the Secretary which sets forth the manner 
in which the infrastructure bank established by the 
State in accordance with this section will be adminis-
tered. 
‘‘(6) LOAN.—The term ‘loan’ means any form of 
direct financial assistance from a State infrastructure 
bank that is required to be repaid over a period of 
time and that is provided to a project sponsor for all 
or part of the costs of the project. 
‘‘(7) GUARANTEE.—The term ‘guarantee’ means 
a contract entered into by a State infrastructure bank 
in which the bank agrees to take responsibility for all
204
or a portion of a project sponsor’s financial obliga-
tions for a project under specified conditions. 
‘‘(8) INITIAL ASSISTANCE.—The term ‘initial as-
sistance’ means the first round of funds that are 
loaned or used for credit enhancement by a State in-
frastructure bank for projects eligible for assistance 
under this section. 
‘‘(9) LEVERAGE.—The term ‘leverage’ means a 
financial structure used to increase funds in a State 
infrastructure bank through the issuance of debt in-
struments. 
‘‘(10) LEVERAGED.—The term ‘leveraged’, as 
used with respect to a State infrastructure bank, 
means that the bank has total potential liabilities 
that exceed the capital of the bank. 
‘‘(b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Subject to the pro-
visions of this section, the Secretary may enter into coopera-
tive agreements with States for the establishment of State 
infrastructure banks for making loans and providing other 
forms of credit assistance to public and private entities car-
rying out or proposing to carry out projects eligible for as-
sistance under this section. 
‘‘(c) INTERSTATE COMPACTS.—Congress grants con-
sent to 2 or more of the States, entering into a cooperative 
agreement under subsection (a) with the Secretary for the
205
establishment by such States of a multi-State infrastructure 
bank in accordance with this section, to enter into an inter-
state compact establishing such bank in accordance with 
this section. 
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—
‘‘(1) HIGHWAY ACCOUNT.—Subject to subsection 
(j), the Secretary may permit a State entering into 
a cooperative agreement under this section to establish 
a State infrastructure bank to deposit into the high-
way account of the bank not to exceed—
‘‘(A) 10 percent of the funds apportioned to 
the State for each of fiscal years 2004 through 
2009 under each of sections 104(b)(1), 104(b)(3), 
104(b)(4), and 144; and 
‘‘(B) 10 percent of the funds allocated to the 
State for each of such fiscal years under section 
105. 
‘‘(2) TRANSIT ACCOUNT.—Subject to subsection 
(j), the Secretary may permit a State entering into 
a cooperative agreement under this section to establish 
a State infrastructure bank, and any other recipient 
of Federal assistance under section 5307, 5309, or 
5311 of title 49, to deposit into the transit account of 
the bank not to exceed 10 percent of the funds made 
available to the State or other recipient in each of fis-
206
cal years 2004 through 2009 for capital projects 
under each of such sections. 
‘‘(3) RAIL ACCOUNT.—Subject to subsection (j), 
the Secretary may permit a State entering into a co-
operative agreement under this section to establish a 
State infrastructure bank, and any other recipient of 
Federal assistance under subtitle V of title 49, to de-
posit into the rail account of the bank funds made 
available to the State or other recipient in each of fis-
cal years 2004 through 2009 for capital projects 
under such subtitle. 
‘‘(4) CAPITAL GRANTS.—
‘‘(A) HIGHWAY
ACCOUNT.—Federal funds 
deposited into a highway account of a State in-
frastructure bank under paragraph (1) shall con-
stitute for purposes of this section a capitaliza-
tion grant for the highway account of the bank. 
‘‘(B) TRANSIT ACCOUNT.—Federal funds de-
posited into a transit account of a State infra-
structure bank under paragraph (2) shall con-
stitute for purposes of this section a capitaliza-
tion grant for the transit account of the bank. 
‘‘(C) RAIL ACCOUNT.—Federal funds depos-
ited into a rail account of a State infrastructure 
bank under paragraph 3 shall constitute for pur-
207
poses of this section a capitalization grant for 
the rail account of the bank. 
‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR URBANIZED AREAS OF 
OVER 200,000.—Funds in a State infrastructure bank 
that are attributed to urbanized areas of a State with 
urbanized populations of over 200,000 under section 
133(d)(3) may be used to provide assistance with re-
spect to a project only if the metropolitan planning 
organization designated for such area concurs, in 
writing, with the provision of such assistance. 
‘‘(6) DISCONTINUANCE OF FUNDING.—If the Sec-
retary determines that a State is not implementing 
the State’s infrastructure bank in accordance with a 
cooperative agreement entered into under subsection 
(b), the Secretary may prohibit the State from con-
tributing additional Federal funds to the bank. 
‘‘(e) FORMS OF ASSISTANCE FROM INFRASTRUCTURE 
BANKS.—An infrastructure bank established under this sec-
tion may make loans or provide other forms of credit assist-
ance to a public or private entity in an amount equal to 
all or a part of the cost of carrying out a project eligible 
for assistance under this section. The amount of any loan 
or other form of credit assistance provided for the project 
may be subordinated to any other debt financing for the 
project. Initial assistance provided with respect to a project
208
from Federal funds deposited into an infrastructure bank 
under this section may not be made in the form of a grant. 
‘‘(f) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—Subject to subsection (e), 
funds in an infrastructure bank established under this sec-
tion may be used only to provide assistance for projects eli-
gible for assistance under this title and capital projects de-
fined in section 5302 of title 49, and any other projects 
related to surface transportation that the Secretary deter-
mines to be appropriate. 
‘‘(g) INFRASTRUCTURE BANK REQUIREMENTS.—In 
order to establish an infrastructure bank under this section, 
the State establishing the bank shall—
‘‘(1) deposit in cash, at a minimum, into each 
account of the bank from non-Federal sources an 
amount equal to 25 percent of the amount of each 
capitalization grant made to the State and deposited 
into such account; except that, if the deposit is into 
the highway account of the bank and the State has a 
non-Federal share under section 120(b) that is less 
than 25 percent, the percentage to be deposited from 
non-Federal sources shall be the lower percentage of 
such grant; 
‘‘(2) ensure that the bank maintains on a con-
tinuing basis an investment grade rating on its debt, 
or has a sufficient level of bond or debt financing in-
209
strument insurance, to maintain the viability of the 
bank; 
‘‘(3) ensure that investment income derived from 
funds deposited to an account of the bank are—
‘‘(A) credited to the account; 
‘‘(B) available for use in providing loans 
and other forms of credit assistance to projects 
eligible for assistance from the account; and 
‘‘(C) invested in United States Treasury se-
curities, bank deposits, or such other financing 
instruments as the Secretary may approve to 
earn interest to enhance the leveraging of projects 
assisted by the bank; 
‘‘(4) ensure that any loan from the bank will 
bear interest at or below market interest rates, as de-
termined by the State, to make the project that is the 
subject of the loan feasible; 
‘‘(5) ensure that repayment of any loan from the 
bank will commence not later than 5 years after the 
project has been completed or, in the case of a high-
way project, the facility has opened to traffic, which-
ever is later; 
‘‘(6) ensure that the term for repaying any loan 
will not exceed 30 years after the date of the first 
payment on the loan; and
210
‘‘(7) require the bank to make an annual report 
to the Secretary on its status no later than September 
30 of each year and such other reports as the Sec-
retary may require under guidelines issued to carry 
out this section. 
‘‘(h) APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL LAW.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The requirements of this title 
and title 49 that would otherwise apply to funds 
made available under this title or such title and 
projects assisted with those funds shall apply to—
‘‘(A) funds made available under this title 
or such title and contributed to an infrastructure 
bank established under this section, including the 
non-Federal contribution required under sub-
section (g); and 
‘‘(B) projects assisted by the bank through 
the use of the funds; 
except to the extent that the Secretary determines that 
any requirement of such title (other than sections 113 
and 114 of this title and section 5333 of title 49), is 
not consistent with the objectives of this section. 
‘‘(2) REPAYMENTS.—The requirements of this 
title and title 49 shall apply to repayments from non-
Federal sources to an infrastructure bank from
211
projects assisted by the bank. Such a repayment shall 
be considered to be Federal funds. 
‘‘(i) UNITED STATES NOT OBLIGATED.—The deposit of 
Federal funds into an infrastructure bank established under 
this section shall not be construed as a commitment, guar-
antee, or obligation on the part of the United States to any 
third party, nor shall any third party have any right 
against the United States for payment solely by virtue of 
the contribution. Any security or debt-financing instrument 
issued by the infrastructure bank shall expressly state that 
the security or instrument does not constitute a commit-
ment, guarantee, or obligation of the United States. 
‘‘(j) MANAGEMENT
OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—Sections 
3335 and 6503 of title 31, shall not apply to funds deposited 
into an infrastructure bank under this section. 
‘‘(k) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.—For each of fiscal 
years 2004 through 2009, a State may expend not to exceed 
2 percent of the Federal funds contributed to an infrastruc-
ture bank established by the State under this section to pay 
the reasonable costs of administering the bank.’’. 
(b) PREPARATORY AMENDMENTS.—
(1) SECTION 181.—Section 181 of such title is 
further amended—
(A) by striking the section designator and 
heading and inserting the following:
212
‘‘§ 181. Generally applicable provisions’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘In this subchapter’’ and 
inserting ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this chapter’’; 
(C) in paragraph (5) by striking ‘‘184’’ and 
inserting ‘‘604’’; and 
(D) in paragraph (11) (as redesignated by 
section 1601(a) of this Act) by striking ‘‘183’’ 
and inserting ‘‘603’’; and 
(E) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF CHAPTER.—For purposes of this 
title, this chapter shall be treated as being part of chapter 
1.’’. 
(2) SECTION 182.—Section 182(b)(2)(A)(viii) of 
such title is further amended by inserting ‘‘and chap-
ter 1’’ after ‘‘this chapter’’. 
(3) SECTION 183.—Section 183(a) of such title is 
further amended—
(A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘182’’ and 
inserting ‘‘602’’; and 
(B) 
in 
paragraph 
(3) 
by 
striking 
‘‘182(b)(2)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘602(b)(2)(B)’’. 
(4) SECTION 184.—Section 184 of such title is 
further amended—
(A) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ‘‘182’’ 
and inserting ‘‘602’’;
213
(B) 
in 
subsection 
(a)(3) 
by 
striking 
‘‘182(b)(2)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘602(b)(2)(B)’’; 
and 
(C) in subsection (b)(10) by striking ‘‘183’’ 
and inserting ‘‘603’’. 
(5) REFERENCES IN SUBCHAPTER.—Subchapter 
II of chapter 1 of such title is amended by striking 
‘‘this subchapter’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘chapter’’. 
(6) SUBCHAPTER HEADINGS.—Chapter 1 of such 
title is further amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘SUBCHAPTER I—
GENERAL PROVISIONS’’ preceding sec-
tion 101; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘SUBCHAPTER II—
INFRASTRUCTURE 
FINANCE’’ 
pre-
ceding section 181. 
(c) CHAPTER 6.—Such title is further amended by 
adding at the end the following:
‘‘CHAPTER 6—INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘601. Generally applicable provisions. 
‘‘602. Determination of eligibility and project selection. 
‘‘603. Secured loans. 
‘‘604. Lines of credit. 
‘‘605. Program administration. 
‘‘606. State and local permits. 
‘‘607. Regulations. 
‘‘608. Funding. 
‘‘609. State infrastructure bank program.’’.
214
(d) MOVING AND REDESIGNATING.—Such title is fur-
ther amended—
(1) by redesignating sections 181 through 189 as 
sections 601 through 609, respectively; 
(2) by moving such sections from chapter 1 to 
chapter 6 (as added by subsection (c)); and 
(3) by inserting such sections after the analysis 
for chapter 6. 
(e) ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER 1 AND TABLE OF CHAP-
TERS.—
(1) ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER 1.—The analysis for 
chapter 1 of such title is amended—
(A) by striking the headings for subchapters 
I and II; and 
(B) by striking the items relating to sections 
181 through 189. 
(2) TABLE OF CHAPTERS.—The table of chapters 
for such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to chapter 5 the following:
‘‘6. Infrastructure and Finance .............................................................
601’’. 
SEC. 1603. INTERSTATE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION AND RE-
HABILITATION TOLL PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish 
and implement an Interstate System reconstruction and re-
215
habilitation toll pilot program under which the Secretary, 
notwithstanding sections 129 and 301 of title 23, United 
States Code, may permit a State to collect tolls on a high-
way, bridge, or tunnel on the Interstate System for the pur-
pose of reconstructing and rehabilitating the facility. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON NUMBER
OF FACILITIES.—The 
Secretary may permit the collection of tolls under this sec-
tion on 3 facilities on the Interstate System. Each of such 
facilities shall be located in a different State. 
(c) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible to participate in the 
pilot program, a State shall submit to the Secretary an ap-
plication that contains, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) An identification of the facility on the Inter-
state System proposed to be a toll facility, including 
the age, condition, and intensity of use of the facility. 
(2) In the case of a facility that affects a metro-
politan area, an assurance that the metropolitan 
planning organization designated under chapter 52 of 
title 49, United States Code, for the area has been 
consulted concerning the placement and amount of 
tolls on the facility. 
(3) An analysis demonstrating that financing 
the reconstruction or rehabilitation of the facility 
with the collection of tolls under the pilot program is
216
the most efficient and economical way to advance the 
project. 
(4) A facility management plan that includes—
(A) a plan for implementing the imposition 
of tolls on the facility; 
(B) a schedule and finance plan for the re-
construction or rehabilitation of the facility 
using toll revenues; 
(C) a description of the public transpor-
tation agency that will be responsible for imple-
mentation and administration of the pilot pro-
gram; 
(D) a description of whether consideration 
will be given to privatizing the maintenance and 
operational aspects of the facility, while retain-
ing legal and administrative control of the por-
tion of the Interstate route; and 
(E) such other information as the Secretary 
may require. 
(d) SELECTION CRITERIA.—The Secretary may ap-
prove the application of a State under subsection (c) only 
if the Secretary determines that—
(1) the State’s analysis under subsection (c)(3) is 
reasonable;
217
(2) the facility has a sufficient intensity of use, 
age, or condition to warrant the collection of tolls; 
(3) the State plan for implementing tolls on the 
facility takes into account the interests of local, re-
gional, and interstate travelers; 
(4) the State plan for reconstruction or rehabili-
tation of the facility using toll revenues is reasonable; 
(5) the State will develop, manage, and main-
tain a system that will automatically collect the tolls; 
(6) in developing the State plan for imple-
menting tolls on the facility, the State includes a pro-
gram to permit low-income drivers to pay a reduced 
toll amount; and 
(7) the State has given preference to the use of 
a public toll agency with demonstrated capability to 
build, operate, and maintain a toll expressway system 
meeting criteria for the Interstate System. 
(e) PROHIBITION ON NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS.—
Before the Secretary may permit a State to participate in 
the pilot program, the State must enter into an agreement 
with the Secretary that provides that the State will not 
enter into an agreement with a private person under which 
the State is prevented from improving or expanding the ca-
pacity of public roads adjacent to the toll facility to address
218
conditions resulting from traffic diverted to such roads from 
the toll facility, including—
(1) excessive congestion; 
(2) pavement wear; and 
(3) an increased incidence of traffic accidents, 
injuries, or fatalities. 
(f) LIMITATIONS ON USE OF REVENUES; AUDITS.—Be-
fore the Secretary may permit a State to participate in 
the pilot program, the State must enter into an agreement 
with the Secretary that provides that—
(1) all toll revenues received from operation of 
the toll facility will be used only for—
(A) debt service; 
(B) reasonable return on investment of any 
private person financing the project; and 
(C) any costs necessary for the improvement 
of and the proper operation and maintenance of 
the toll facility, including reconstruction, resur-
facing, restoration, and rehabilitation of the toll 
facility; and 
(2) regular audits will be conducted to ensure 
compliance with paragraph (1) and the results of 
such audits will be transmitted to the Secretary. 
(g) LIMITATION ON USE OF INTERSTATE MAINTE-
NANCE FUNDS.—During the term of the pilot program,
219
funds apportioned for Interstate maintenance under section 
104(b)(4) of title 23, United States Code, may not be used 
on a facility for which tolls are being collected under the 
program. 
(h) PROGRAM TERM.—The Secretary may approve an 
application of a State for permission to collect a toll under 
this section only if the application is received by the Sec-
retary before the last day of the 10-year period beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act. 
(i) INTERSTATE SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘Interstate System’’ has the meaning such term 
has under section 101 of title 23, United States Code. 
(j) REPORT.—Not later than September 30, 2011, the 
Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a report on traffic congestion on, pavement wear 
of, and incidence of accidents, injuries, and fatalities on 
public roads adjacent to toll facilities established under this 
section and section 1604. 
(k) REPEAL.—Section 1216(b) of the Transportation 
Equity Act for the 21st Century (23 U.S.C. 129 note; 112 
Stat. 212) is repealed.
220
SEC. 1604. INTERSTATE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION TOLL 
PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish 
and implement an Interstate System construction toll pilot 
program under which the Secretary, notwithstanding sec-
tions 129 and 301 of title 23, United States Code, may per-
mit a State or an interstate compact of States to collect 
tolls on a highway, bridge, or tunnel on the Interstate Sys-
tem for the purpose of constructing Interstate highways. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON NUMBER
OF FACILITIES.—The 
Secretary may permit the collection of tolls under this sec-
tion on 3 facilities on the Interstate System. 
(c) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible to participate in the 
pilot program, a State shall submit to the Secretary an ap-
plication that contains, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) An identification of the facility on the Inter-
state System proposed to be a toll facility. 
(2) In the case of a facility that affects a metro-
politan area, an assurance that the metropolitan 
planning organization designated under chapter 52 of 
title 49, United States Code, for the area has been 
consulted concerning the placement and amount of 
tolls on the facility. 
(3) An analysis demonstrating that financing 
the construction of the facility with the collection of
221
tolls under the pilot program is the most efficient and 
economical way to advance the project. 
(4) A facility management plan that includes—
(A) a plan for implementing the imposition 
of tolls on the facility; 
(B) a schedule and finance plan for the con-
struction of the facility using toll revenues; 
(C) a description of the public transpor-
tation agency that will be responsible for imple-
mentation and administration of the pilot pro-
gram; 
(D) a description of whether consideration 
will be given to privatizing the maintenance and 
operational aspects of the facility, while retain-
ing legal and administrative control of the por-
tion of the Interstate route; and 
(E) such other information as the Secretary 
may require. 
(d) SELECTION CRITERIA.—The Secretary may ap-
prove the application of a State under subsection (c) only 
if the Secretary determines that—
(1) the State’s analysis under subsection (c)(3) is 
reasonable;
222
(2) the State plan for implementing tolls on the 
facility takes into account the interests of local, re-
gional, and interstate travelers; 
(3) the State plan for construction of the facility 
using toll revenues is reasonable; 
(4) the State will develop, manage, and main-
tain a system that will automatically collect the tolls; 
(5) in developing the State plan for imple-
menting tolls on the facility, the State includes a pro-
gram to permit low-income drivers to pay a reduced 
toll amount; and 
(6) the State has given preference to the use of 
a public toll agency with demonstrated capability to 
build, operate, and maintain a toll expressway system 
meeting criteria for the Interstate System. 
(e) PROHIBITION ON NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS.—
Before the Secretary may permit a State to participate in 
the pilot program, the State must enter into an agreement 
with the Secretary that provides that the State will not 
enter into an agreement with a private person under which 
the State is prevented from improving or expanding the ca-
pacity of public roads adjacent to the toll facility to address 
conditions resulting from traffic diverted to such roads from 
the toll facility, including—
(1) excessive congestion;
223
(2) pavement wear; and 
(3) an increased incidence of traffic accidents, 
injuries, or fatalities. 
(f) LIMITATIONS ON USE OF REVENUES; AUDITS.—Be-
fore the Secretary may permit a State to participate in 
the pilot program, the State must enter into an agreement 
with the Secretary that provides that—
(1) all toll revenues received from operation of 
the toll facility will be used only for—
(A) debt service; 
(B) reasonable return on investment of any 
private person financing the project; and 
(C) any costs necessary for the improvement 
of and the proper operation and maintenance of 
the toll facility, including reconstruction, resur-
facing, restoration, and rehabilitation of the toll 
facility; and 
(2) regular audits will be conducted to ensure 
compliance with paragraph (1) and the results of 
such audits will be transmitted to the Secretary. 
(g) LIMITATION ON USE OF INTERSTATE MAINTE-
NANCE FUNDS.—During the term of the pilot program, 
funds apportioned for Interstate maintenance under section 
104(b)(4) of title 23, United States Code, may not be used
224
on a facility for which tolls are being collected under the 
program. 
(h) PROGRAM TERM.—The Secretary may approve an 
application of a State for permission to collect a toll under 
this section only if the application is received by the Sec-
retary before the last day of the 10-year period beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act. 
(i) INTERSTATE SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘Interstate System’’ has the meaning such term 
has under section 101 of title 23, United States Code. 
SEC. 1605. USE OF EXCESS FUNDS. 
Section 106 of title 23, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(i) USE OF EXCESS FUNDS.—
‘‘(1) AUDITS.—A State may audit projects fund-
ed with amounts apportioned under sections 104 and 
144 to determine whether any amounts obligated for 
a project are excess funds. 
‘‘(2) PLANS FOR USE OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If a 
State determines, after conducting an audit under 
paragraph (1), that funds obligated for a project are 
excess funds, the State may develop a plan for obli-
gating the funds for the design and construction of 
one or more projects that are eligible for funding
225
under the program for which the funds were origi-
nally apportioned. 
‘‘(3) CERTIFICATION
TO
THE
SECRETARY.—A 
State that has developed a plan under paragraph (2) 
shall transmit to the Secretary a certification that the 
State has conducted an audit under paragraph (1) 
and developed the plan in accordance with paragraph 
(2). 
‘‘(4) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANS.—After trans-
mitting a certification to the Secretary with respect 
to a plan under paragraph (3), the State may carry 
out the plan. 
‘‘(5) APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS.—Excess 
funds used to carry out a project under this section 
shall be subject to the requirements of this title that 
are applicable to the program for which the funds 
were originally apportioned. 
‘‘(6) EXCESS
FUNDS
DEFINED.—In this sub-
section, the term ‘excess funds’ means funds obligated 
for a project that remain available for the project 
after the project has been completed.’’. 
Subtitle G—High Priority Projects 
SEC. 1701. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS PROGRAM. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS.—
Section 117(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended
226
by striking ‘‘1602 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 
21st Century’’ and inserting ‘‘1701 of the Transportation 
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users’’. 
(b) ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES.—Section 117(b) of 
such title is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through 
(6) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) 19.6 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2004; 
‘‘(2) 18.5 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2005; 
‘‘(3) 16.3 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2006; 
‘‘(4) 15.3 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2007; 
‘‘(5) 15.8 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2008; and 
‘‘(6) 14.5 percent of such amount shall be avail-
able for obligation beginning in fiscal year 2009.’’. 
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—Section 117(c) of such title is 
amended by striking ‘‘; except’’ and all that follows through 
‘‘cost thereof’’. 
(d) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—Section 117(e) of such 
title is amended by striking ‘‘1602 of the Transportation 
Equity Act for the 21st Century’’ each place it appears and
227
inserting ‘‘1701 of the Transportation Equity Act: A Leg-
acy for Users’’. 
(e) AVAILABILITY OF OBLIGATION LIMITATION.—Sec-
tion 117(g) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘Transpor-
tation Equity Act for the 21st Century’’ and inserting 
‘‘Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users’’. 
(f) FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP.—Section 145(b) 
of such title is amended—
(1) by inserting after ‘‘described in’’ the fol-
lowing: ‘‘section 1702 of the Transportation Equity 
Act: A Legacy for Users,’’; 
(2) by inserting after ‘‘for such projects by’’ the 
following: ‘‘section 1101(a)(17) of the Transportation 
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users,’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘117 of title 23, United States 
Code,’’ and inserting ‘‘section 117 of this title,’’. 
SEC. 1702. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
Subject to section 117 of title 23, United States Code, 
the amount listed for each high priority project in the fol-
lowing table shall be available (from amounts made avail-
able by section 1101(a)(17) of the Transportation Equity 
Act: A Legacy for Users) for fiscal years 2004 through 2009 
to carry out each such project:
High Priority Projects 
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
1. 
Alaska .................
Bogard/Seldon Extension in Matanuska-
Susitna Borough.
$4,000,000.00
228
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
2. 
Utah ....................
Widen and improve Geneva Road/ SR-
114 
connecting 
Provo 
Utah 
and 
Plesant Grove Utah.
$2,100,000.00
3. 
Mississippi .........
Philadelphia 
Bypass 
Hwys 
to 
19:Four-lane bypass connecting MS 
Hwys 15, 16 & 19 south of Philadel-
phia with major interchanges at each 
connection point.
$1,500,000.00
4. 
Virginia ..............
Town of Pound Riverwalk -construction 
of pedestrian riverwalk, Town of 
Pound.
$100,000.00
5. 
California ...........
Construct parking lot and improved mu-
seum pedestrian access from the trol-
ley station, San Diego.
$1,000,000.00
6. 
Pennsylvania .....
Improve State Route 1001 at Section 
601 from the Village of Lockport to 
Queensrun.
$1,000,000.00
7. 
Kansas ................
Construct 127th Street bridge over I-35, 
Olathe.
$3,000,000.00
8. 
New York ............
Improvements to Rt. 32/17/6 and County 
Route 105 in Orange County - NY.
$9,000,000.00
9. 
Missouri ..............
Resurfacing and shoulder widening on 
US 136, and replacement of 2 defi-
cient bridges.
$3,000,000.00
10. 
New Hampshire
Replace Ash Street, Pillsbury Road 
bridge over I93 in Londonderry.
$1,430,000.00
11. 
Georgia ...............
Pave portions of CR345, CR44, and CR 
45, Hancock County.
$370,000.00
12. 
Georgia ...............
Install traffic lights and pedestrian 
walkways on Highway 441 at MLK, 
Jr. Boulevard, Dublin.
$500,000.00
13. 
Washington .........
Construct a multi-jurisdictional non-mo-
torized transportation project parallel 
to SR99 called the Interurban Trail.
$2,000,000.00
14. 
Virginia ..............
Green Cove - improvements to existing 
Forest Service facility located at the 
trailhead of the Virginia Creeper 
Trail.
$100,000.00
15. 
Michigan .............
Westland, Reconstruct and Widen Palm-
er Road.
$2,500,000.00
16. 
Mississippi .........
Upgrade roads in Port Gibson (U.S. 
Hwy 61), Claiborne County.
$600,000.00
17. 
New York ............
Build a structural deck that spans the 
New Haven Railroad cut to create 
parking for commuters, Mount Vernon.
$2,000,000.00
18. 
California ...........
Improvement of intersection at Aviation 
Blvd. and Rosecrans Ave. to reduce 
congestion, Hawthorne.
$2,000,000.00
19. 
Illinois ................
Improvements to Diehl Road between 
Eola Road and Route 59.
$500,000.00
20. 
New Jersey .........
Streetscape Improvements to Clements 
Bridge Road from Newton Avenue to 
New Jersey Turnpike, Barrington.
$500,000.00
21. 
New York ............
Design and construct new Interchange 
11A on I-87, connector road extending 
from I-87 to Route 9/67, and inter-
change between the connector road and 
Route 9/67.
$3,400,000.00
22. 
Massachusetts .....
Planning and construction of East Bos-
ton Haul Road, Boston.
$6,000,000.00
23. 
Arkansas .............
Construction of Camden Port Access 
Road, Camden.
$480,000.00
229
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
24. 
New York ............
Construct phase 2 of the Grand Con-
course improvements from East 161st 
St. to East 166th St.
$10,000,000.00
25. 
Ohio ....................
Construct upgrade of SR 16 to 4 lanes 
from SR 60 to SR 16 in Coshocton 
County.
$3,000,000.00
26. 
California ...........
Construct Cypress Avenue over-pass to 
separate Interstate 10 and Union Pa-
cific Railroad tracks, Fontana.
$3,500,000.00
27. 
Arkansas .............
Improvements to Johnson Road from 
Hwy 412 to I-540 through Springdale 
and Johnson.
$6,000,000.00
28. 
Minnesota ...........
For design of an extension of road from 
TH10 in the city of Blaine north to 
the city of Ham Lake.
$2,000,000.00
29. 
California ...........
8.5 miles of six and eight lane arterial 
roadways, building an essential east-
west route across Santa Clarita Valley.
$5,000,000.00
30. 
Iowa ....................
Completion of Highway 20 from Fort 
Dodge, Iowa through Sioux City, Iowa.
$3,000,000.00
31. 
Alabama .............
I-65 interchange at CR-222 between SR-
69 and US-278.
$1,000,000.00
32. 
Minnesota ...........
Becker County CR 143 and CR 124 im-
provements.
$960,000.00
33. 
South Carolina ..
BMW/I-85 Interchange - construct a new 
interchange 
on 
I-85 
between 
the 
Greenville Spartanburg Airport and 
SC Highway 101 interchanges.
$10,000,000.00
34. 
Illinois ................
Construct bike/pedestrian paths, Orland 
Hills.
$350,000.00
35. 
New York ............
Rehabilitate a historic warehouse on the 
Erie Canal in the Town of Lyon, NY.
$600,000.00
36. 
Arkansas .............
Improvements to the I-540 and SH-102 
Interchange in Bentonville.
$1,420,000.00
37. 
Florida ................
Airport Entrance Streetscape, Sanford ..
$500,000.00
38. 
Washington .........
East Marine View Drive Widening, 
Everett.
$9,000,000.00
39. 
Ohio ....................
Improvements to the intersection of Ful-
ton Dr. and Wales Ave. in Jackson 
Township.
$2,000,000.00
40. 
Oregon ................
Highway 34/Corvallis Bypass Intersec-
tion.
$2,100,000.00
41. 
New Jersey .........
Route 82 Union County Streetscape im-
provements, including signing and 
lighting upgrades in Elizabeth City 
and Union Township.
$1,000,000.00
42. 
Illinois ................
Construct connector road between Col-
linsville Rd to IL 3/North First 
Street, St. Clair County.
$6,400,000.00
43. 
Colorado ..............
New bridge across Roaring Fork River 
near S end of Glenwood Springs, im-
prove roads connecting Midland Ave/
SH 82.
$6,500,000.00
44. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct improvements to 
the I-81/Route 465 interchange and 
Route 465 from Walnut Bottom Road 
to PA 641.
$3,870,500.00
45. 
Texas ...................
Extend and improve Mission Trails 
Project, San Antonio.
$4,000,000.00
46. 
Minnesota ...........
Improve TH241 in St. Michael, MN by 
increasing lanes from 2 to 4.
$4,000,000.00
230
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
47. 
Ohio ....................
Upgrade safety devices at Sheldon Road 
Crossing, Berea.
$140,000.00
48. 
Michigan .............
Gravel and paving of remaining 3.2 
miles in 5.5 mile stretch of Jacobsville 
Road, Houghton County.
$430,000.00
49. 
New York ............
Implement safety measures at Railroad 
grade crossings in Rockland County.
$1,000,000.00
50. 
Illinois ................
Construct pedestrian underpass at South 
Shore Drive and 67th Street, Chicago.
$1,000,000.00
51. 
Ohio ....................
Bicycle Trails construction and design 
in Bainbridge Township.
$1,440,000.00
52. 
Ohio ....................
Construct 
MetroParks 
Bikeway, 
Mahoning County.
$376,000.00
53. 
Georgia ...............
Streetscape [pedestrian safety enhance-
ments, sidewalks, curb replacement, 
restoration, landscaping, ADA compli-
ance], Bainbridge.
$600,000.00
54. 
Nebraska .............
Construct an 8.7 mile roadway consti-
tuting the first phase of a comprehen-
sive Beltway System around the City 
of Lincoln.
$14,566,300.00
55. 
Minnesota ...........
Design engineering and ROW acquisi-
tion to reconstruct TH95 bridge, 
North Branch.
$1,000,000.00
56. 
Virginia ..............
Improve Colorado Street bridge, Salem ..
$1,000,000.00
57. 
California ...........
Implement streetscape improvements on 
segments of Laurel Canyon Blvd. and 
Victory Blvd., North Hollywood.
$1,200,000.00
58. 
New Jersey .........
Bicycle and pedestrian paths for New 
Jersey Underground Railroad.
$1,000,000.00
59. 
Arizona ...............
Major widening of SR 95 within Lake 
Havasu City.
$2,000,000.00
60. 
Minnesota ...........
Lake Street Access to I-35W, Min-
neapolis.
$10,000,000.00
61. 
New York ............
Implement Improvements for Pedestrian 
Safety in Kings County.
$1,000,000.00
62. 
California ...........
Construct a diamond interchange on 
State Route 60 at Lemon Avenue in 
the city of Diamond Bar.
$12,600,000.00
63. 
Arkansas .............
Downtown Dickson Street Enhancement 
- College Avenue from Dickson Street 
to Archibald Yell and School Avenue 
to 6th Street in Fayetteville.
$4,000,000.00
64. 
Pennsylvania .....
Flyover ramp and new interchange at 
proposed Town Center in Cranberry 
Twp at I-79 and Rte 228.
$500,000.00
65. 
Texas ...................
Improvements to RR 1017, Hebbronville 
$500,000.00
66. 
Arizona ...............
Construction 
of 
a 
bicycle/pedestrian 
bridge to connect the shores of the Salt 
River.
$3,000,000.00
67. 
Pennsylvania .....
Germantown 
Avenue 
Revitalization 
Project involving landscaping, scenic 
enhancements, and pedestrian safety 
improvements along the heavily trav-
eled thoroughfare.
$2,600,000.00
68. 
Georgia ...............
Widening SR-104 to increase Columbia 
Co. access to critical Augusta medical 
facilities as well as the Medical Col-
lege of GA.
$4,750,000.00
69. 
California ...........
Repair Rosecrans Ave and Alondra Blvd 
bridges, Bellflower.
$50,000.00
231
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
70. 
California ...........
Study feasibility of Maglev link between 
San Diego and proposed San Diego 
Regional International Airport, Impe-
rial County.
$1,000,000.00
71. 
Illinois ................
The addition of turning lanes to US Rt. 
14 (Northwest Highway) at the Ar-
thur Avenue Union Pacific grade 
crossing and at the Prindle Underpass 
in Arlington Heights, Illinois.
$1,100,000.00
72. 
Connecticut .........
Improve Route 1 between Belden Ave 
and East Ave in Norwalk, CT.
$2,000,000.00
73. 
Maryland ............
South Shore Trail. Construct first phase 
of greenway from Odenton to Annap-
olis, Anne Arundel County.
$1,000,000.00
74. 
Virginia ..............
Widening Highway-15 in Prince Ed-
ward County.
$5,000,000.00
75. 
New York ............
Rehab of Hornbeck Rd in Town of 
Poughkeepsie-NY.
$426,550.00
76. 
Illinois ................
Phase II engineering to widen US 45/
LaGrange Road through Orland Park, 
IL.
$1,000,000.00
77. 
Virginia ..............
Improve Frederick Street, Staunton .......
$1,300,000.00
78. 
Alabama .............
Riverwalk project with continuous river-
edge walkway creating a system of 
parks and open spaces in historic 
downtown Montgomery, AL.
$3,000,000.00
79. 
Georgia ...............
Install landscaping and upgrade light-
ing on Fall Line Freeway, Reynolds.
$500,000.00
80. 
Utah ....................
13th East, Sandy City .............................
$6,300,000.00
81. 
Ohio ....................
Construction of rail grade separations at 
intersections in Lima to improve mo-
torist and pedestrian safety.
$1,250,000.00
82. 
New Jersey .........
Observer 
Highway 
Operational 
and 
Safety Improvements, Hoboken.
$2,500,000.00
83. 
New York ............
Implement ITS system and apparatus to 
enhance citywide truck route system 
on LIE Eastbound Service Road at 
74th Street to Caldwell Ave, Grand 
Ave from 69th Street to Flushing Ave, 
and Eliot Ave from 69th Street to 
Woodhaven Blvd.
$100,000.00
84. 
California ...........
Construction of interchange on Interstate 
10 at Palm Drive.
$2,000,000.00
85. 
Illinois ................
Improve roads and bridges and under-
take enhancements, Chicago.
$1,000,000.00
86. 
New York ............
Rehabilitate Tappan Street Bridge in 
Town of Newark Valley.
$1,040,000.00
87. 
California ...........
Widen the Marin- Sonoma Narrows sec-
tion of Highway 101 to include a car-
pool HOV lane in each direction.
$13,000,000.00
88. 
Wisconsin ...........
Replace Wisconsin Street Bridge (State 
Highway 44), Oshkosh, WI.
$10,000,000.00
89. 
Florida ................
Construct I-95/N US 1 Business Park 
Interchange in Ormond Beach, Flor-
ida.
$4,000,000.00
90. 
New York ............
Replacement of the structurally deficient 
Pleasantville Road bridge over the 
Pocantico River, the Village of Pleas-
antville.
$1,000,000.00
91. 
Arkansas .............
Widen Lone Sassafrass Road, Drew 
County.
$304,000.00
232
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
92. 
Texas ...................
Planning, design and engineering for 
transportation projects in the I-35 
corridor between San Antonio and 
Georgetown.
$4,000,000.00
93. 
California ...........
State Route 67 (Mapleview to Dye Rd) 
Project Studies/Environmental Phase.
$6,400,000.00
94. 
New York ............
Construction of and improvements to 
Route 62 in the Village of Hamburg.
$500,000.00
95. 
Texas ...................
Relocation of FM 450 to the west of 
Hallsville.
$3,000,000.00
96. 
Oregon ................
Upgrade the Interstate 5 Fern Valley 
Interchange (exit 24).
$3,000,000.00
97. 
California ...........
Provide grade separation at the Fire-
stone / Old River School Road inter-
section, Downey.
$1,000,000.00
98. 
Texas ...................
Grade separation at US59-SH99 & re-
place proposed interim ramps. Com-
plete US59 reconstruction project. 
Recommended by the US59 MIS.
$5,000,000.00
99. 
Maine ..................
Calais/St. 
Stephen 
Border 
Crossing 
Project.
$5,000,000.00
100. 
Michigan .............
US-127 Completion in Gratiot County ..
$5,000,000.00
101. 
Nebraska .............
Construct two Missouri River bridges 
and their approach roadways.
$3,000,000.00
102. 
New Jersey .........
Highway Improvements in Liberty Cor-
ridor.
$5,000,000.00
103. 
New Jersey .........
Interstate 195 Allentown, NJ Exit at 
Sharon Station Road.
$1,500,000.00
104. 
California ...........
Expand carsharing pilot program to 
serve low- and moderate-income neigh-
borhoods in the City and County of 
San Francisco.
$2,000,000.00
105. 
Ohio ....................
Construct the existing industrial park 
road from local to state standards 
near Cadiz.
$4,100,000.00
106. 
Pennsylvania .....
Median, guiderail and sidework im-
provements to intersection of SR 51 
and Franklin Ave, Beaver County.
$2,000,000.00
107. 
New York ............
Roadway improvements on Pidgeon Hill 
Road (NYS Route 25 to Old Country 
Road) and Old Country Road (NYS 
Route 25 to I-495), Huntington.
$1,500,000.00
108. 
Alabama .............
Alignment of existing roads along Coun-
ty Road 83 providing hurricane evac-
uation from coast to I10.
$8,000,000.00
109. 
Texas ...................
Construction of SH121 main lanes and 
interchanges between Preston Road 
and US75.
$9,000,000.00
110. 
Texas ...................
SH 114/SH 170 in South Denton Coun-
ty.
$2,500,000.00
111. 
Oregon ................
Repair and recoat logging bridge over 
Highway 99E, Canby.
$150,000.00
112. 
North Carolina ...
Relocate US 70 to multi-lane facility 
around Clayton.
$9,000,000.00
113. 
Ohio ....................
Construct Morse Road Corridor Improve-
ments Phase I in Columbus, Ohio.
$1,000,000.00
114. 
California ...........
Improve I-8 offramp to the Desert Farm-
ing Institute, Imperial County.
$1,000,000.00
115. 
Georgia ...............
Upgrade sidewalks, lighting, landscaping 
from Cherry Street to Hampton 
Street, Industrial Park to Dooly 
Street, Montezuma.
$500,000.00
233
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
116. 
New York ............
Dolsontown Rd. improvements in Town 
of Wawayanda.
$1,400,000.00
117. 
Maryland ............
Replace Dover Bridge on MD 331Design 
and Right of Way.
$4,080,000.00
118. 
Pennsylvania .....
Reconstruct PA Route 274, at PA 
Route11/15, Duncannon.
$1,000,000.00
119. 
Virginia ..............
Construct I-64 and Pocahontas Parkway 
Connector.
$9,000,000.00
120. 
Texas ...................
IH-653 and I-30 interchange improve-
ments.
$8,000,000.00
121. 
North Carolina ...
Widen Berkley Blvd in Goldsboro, NC by 
constructing an additional lane, curbs, 
and gutters.
$1,000,000.00
122. 
California ...........
Replace SR22 Interchanges and Bridges, 
Garden Grove.
$7,300,000.00
123. 
Illinois ................
Construction of 2 North-South Blvds, 
and one east-west blvd in the vicinity 
of Northern Illinois University.
$14,400,000.00
124. 
Illinois ................
Improve University Drive, Macomb ........
$500,000.00
125. 
Tennessee ............
Develop trails, bike paths and rec-
reational facilities on Brady Moun-
tain, Cumberland County for Cum-
berland Trail State Park.
$250,000.00
126. 
Minnesota ...........
Construct ramps and new bridge over 
Interstate 35 at CSAH 17, and recon-
struct CSAH 17 from west County 
Line to CSAH 30, Chisago County.
$900,000.00
127. 
Massachusetts .....
I-93 Interchange, Andover/Tewksbury .....
$600,000.00
128. 
Pennsylvania .....
Two-lane extension of Bristol Road from 
US 202 to Park Avenue, Chalfont, 
New Britian.
$1,000,000.00
129. 
Michigan .............
Reconstruction of Ritchie Road from vil-
lage of Lincoln to Hubbard Lake road 
and of Hubbard Lake road to Mt. 
Maria Road, Alcona County.
$813,000.00
130. 
Mississippi .........
Madison/Ridgeland I-55 Interchange:I-
55 Interchange and connectors at 
juncture of Madison and Ridgeland 
corp. limits.
$1,500,000.00
131. 
California ...........
Construct Daggett Road and Bridge 
Project, Port of Stockton, CA.
$5,000,000.00
132. 
New York ............
Construct Wading River bicycle and pe-
destrian project, Riverhead.
$1,200,000.00
133. 
Oregon ................
Improve U.S. 97 from Modoc Point to 
Algoma.
$2,000,000.00
134. 
New York ............
Design, Study and Construct Ferry Ter-
minal Facilities at Floyd Bennett 
Field.
$1,000,000.00
135. 
Minnesota ...........
US Highway 10 interchange in the city 
of Ramsey for necessary corridor en-
hancements.
$1,250,000.00
136. 
Arkansas .............
Continued 
development 
of 
Caraway 
Road Overpass Project, Jonesboro.
$7,000,000.00
137. 
New York ............
Conduct study on extending the limited 
access portion of NYS Rt. 5 to Auburn.
$150,000.00
138. 
California ...........
Rehabilitate arterials, Compton ..............
$1,500,000.00
139. 
Texas ...................
US 82--Widen existing 2-lane facility to 
4-lane divided facility from FM 1417 
in Sherman to US 69 in Bells.
$5,900,000.00
140. 
Maryland ............
US 220/MD53 North-South Corridor ......
$1,000,000.00
234
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
141. 
Connecticut .........
Improve Route 111 between Purdy Hill 
Road and Fan Hill Road in Monroe, 
CT.
$1,500,000.00
142. 
Michigan .............
Wixom, Beck Road from I-96 to West 
Rd. widen to 5 lanes.
$250,000.00
143. 
Pennsylvania .....
SR 219-Purchase of right-of-way and the 
completion of the four-lane expansion 
of limited access highway from Town 
of Somerset to Maryland border.
$20,000,000.00
144. 
New York ............
Improvements of concrete curbs, aprons, 
sidewalks, and asphalt along Sunrise 
Highway, Rockville Centre.
$1,000,000.00
145. 
North Carolina ...
Construction 
of 
Interstate 
from 
Maxton Bypass to NC 41 near Lum-
berton.
$5,000,000.00
146. 
Michigan .............
Expansion of US-31 from Nelson Street 
to Merkey Road.
$1,500,000.00
147. 
Arizona ...............
Develop a 4-lane divided roadway on 
US 60 from Florence to Superior, Ari-
zona.
$3,000,000.00
148. 
New York ............
Reconstruct Streets and Sidewalks in 
Middle Village.
$1,000,000.00
149. 
California ...........
Improvements for the Watt Avenue cor-
ridor between Antelope Road and the 
Capital City Freeway.
$3,000,000.00
150. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of a connector road 
between the Valmont Industrial Park 
and Pennsylvania State Route 924 at 
Cranberry Creek.
$500,000.00
151. 
Minnesota ...........
Edge of Wilderness Discovery Center, 
Marcell.
$471,000.00
152. 
North Carolina ...
Construction of a multi-lane facility on 
new location from Beach Drive (SR 
1104) to NC 211, Brunswick County.
$4,000,000.00
153. 
New York ............
Bartow Ave Ramp and Reconstruction 
at the Hutchinson Parkway.
$1,600,000.00
154. 
Ohio ....................
South Connector in Waverly, Ohio for 
new access to school campus and new 
development areas in a repressed Ap-
palachian region.
$4,100,000.00
155. 
South Carolina ..
Construct grade separation at U.S. 521, 
Lancaster County.
$1,745,000.00
156. 
Massachusetts .....
Downtown road revitalization for Pleas-
ant Street, Malden.
$4,000,000.00
157. 
California ...........
Widen & realign Cherry Avenue from 
19th Street to one block south of Pa-
cific Coast Highway, Signal Hill.
$5,630,000.00
158. 
New York ............
Construction of Bikeway Phase III in 
Putnam County-NY.
$459,895.00
159. 
Ohio ....................
Miami St. along St. Route 53 safety en-
hancement project to improve access to 
railroad crossing.
$1,000,000.00
160. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct access to York 
County 
intermodal 
facility, 
York 
County.
$2,000,000.00
161. 
California ...........
Traffic signal upgrade, road reconfigura-
tion, and median strip improvements 
to Lakewood Blvd between Telegraph 
Rd and Gardendale St, Downey.
$2,500,000.00
235
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
162. 
New York ............
To conduct mitigation measures associ-
ated with the Palisades Interstate 
Parkway for the Village of New 
Square, Rockland County.
$600,000.00
163. 
Alabama .............
County Road 52 widening from S. 
Shades Crest Road to U.S. 31 in Hel-
ena and Pelham.
$5,000,000.00
164. 
Louisiana ...........
Improve I-10/LA 95 intersection, Duson 
$200,000.00
165. 
Michigan .............
Reconstruct 4,000 feet of Church Road 
from Meridian to East River Road 
(excluding canal Bridge) including 
widening and sidewalk construction to 
eliminate safety hazards, Grosse Ile.
$450,000.00
166. 
Michigan .............
Construct road improvements to Flush-
ing Road from Ballenger Highway to 
I-475, City of Flint.
$2,500,840.00
167. 
South Carolina ..
Airline Road Bridge in Anderson ...........
$170,000.00
168. 
New Jersey .........
Planning for Liberty Corridor ................
$500,000.00
169. 
Pennsylvania .....
Enhance existing directional markers 
and increase wayfinding signage in-
frastructure, Monroe County.
$750,000.00
170. 
California ...........
Construct Coyote Creek Trail from Kelly 
Park to Berryessa station, San Jose.
$5,500,000.00
171. 
Michigan .............
Garden City, Reconstruction Maplewood 
between Inkster and Merriman.
$1,000,000.00
172. 
Missouri ..............
Study of BNSF Railroad Reconfigura-
tion Needs to eliminate Highway 
Crossings in/around Springfield, MO.
$200,000.00
173. 
Tennessee ............
Construct new exit on I-75 and connect 
to U.S. 11, U.S. 411 and State Route 
30.
$4,500,000.00
174. 
Ohio ....................
Road widening and safety improvements 
at Main and Bell Streets in the Vil-
lage of Chagrin Falls.
$500,000.00
175. 
Utah ....................
Construct Westside Connector in Provo 
Utah connecting I-15 University Ave 
Interchange and Provo Commercial 
Sector with the Provo Airport.
$2,050,000.00
176. 
California ...........
Reconstruct I-880/Route 92 Interchange, 
Hayward.
$2,000,000.00
177. 
California ...........
Reconstruct and widen Garfield Ave. 
bridge over Rio Hondo River Channel 
and 
apply 
seismic 
improvements, 
South Gate.
$4,000,000.00
178. 
Massachusetts .....
Somerville bikepath extension and im-
provements, Somerville.
$1,000,000.00
179. 
Pennsylvania .....
Upgrade of southbound access ramp at 
Exit 3 on Interstate 81.
$1,000,000.00
180. 
Oklahoma ...........
Construct overpass over 2 rail lines and 
Highway 66, Claremore.
$2,700,000.00
181. 
Pennsylvania .....
Upgrade intersection of SR 30 and SR 
981 at Arnold Palmer Regional Air-
port.
$1,000,000.00
182. 
Indiana ...............
Realign State Road 312, Hammond .......
$4,200,000.00
183. 
Pennsylvania .....
Replacement of bridge without pedes-
trian access in Mount Joy.
$250,000.00
184. 
Georgia ...............
Highway 
Corridor 
Improvement 
Project: This project consists of safety 
enhancements for the corridor, infra-
structure needs, median upgrades, and 
lighting.
$7,000,000.00
236
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
185. 
Virgin Islands ....
Construct extensions to Routes 703 & 70, 
St. Croix.
$7,000,000.00
186. 
Illinois ................
IL29 from IL 6 to I 180 study and land 
acquisition.
$1,000,000.00
187. 
New York ............
Construct Northern State Parkway and 
Long Island Expressway access at 
Marcus Avenue and Lakeville Road 
and associated Park and Ride.
$6,000,000.00
188. 
New York ............
Highway Construction I-87 Exit 3 Air-
port Connector.
$2,000,000.00
189. 
New York ............
Transportation Enhancements in Orle-
ans and/or Niagara Counties to sup-
port development of Erie Canal.
$1,750,000.00
190. 
New Jersey .........
Addresses congestion, safety, drainage, 
maintenance, signing, access, pedes-
trian circulation and transit access 
along Rt. 17 & Rt. 4 in Bergen Coun-
ty.
$4,500,000.00
191. 
New Jersey .........
Safety, traffic and pedestrian improve-
ments to Newark/1st Streets, Hoboken.
$300,000.00
192. 
California ...........
Upgrade Route 4 East from the vicinity 
of Loveridge Road to G Street, Contra 
Costa County.
$15,000,000.00
193. 
Florida ................
Interchange with I-10 to connect to a 
new north-south highway, and a sec-
ond phase extending to US 90.
$3,000,000.00
194. 
North Carolina ...
Widen and improve US 1 in Richmond 
County with a bypass of Rockingham, 
NC.
$10,000,000.00
195. 
New York ............
Construct pedestrian waterfront walk-
way, Owego.
$1,000,000.00
196. 
Kansas ................
Rehabilitate Kansas and Oklahoma Rail 
Line to improve highway safety, de-
crease highway cnogestion, and reduce 
future road and bridge repairs.
$5,730,000.00
197. 
Georgia ...............
East 
Point 
Downtown 
Streetscape 
Project.
$2,000,000.00
198. 
New York ............
Improvements to Route 96 Bridges over 
Seneca River.
$3,000,000.00
199. 
Illinois ................
Reconstruction of Frank Scott Parkway 
East, St. Clair County.
$3,000,000.00
200. 
Texas ...................
Conduct feasibility study for a second 
bridge to Pleasure Island in Port Ar-
thur.
$500,000.00
201. 
Texas ...................
Relocation of 10th Street, relocation of 
Mission Inlet, and extension of run-
way 13/31, McAllen.
$1,000,000.00
202. 
New York ............
Bridge replacement at Turk Hill Rd in 
Putnam County-NY.
$1,800,000.00
203. 
Oregon ................
Street improvements to provide better 
access to the Wayne L. Morse United 
States Courthouse.
$6,000,000.00
204. 
California ...........
Mid Valley Station Road and Inter-
Modal Improvement Project.
$2,500,000.00
205. 
Alabama .............
To provide four lanes on US-80, Perry 
County, Marengo County, and Sumter 
County.
$14,000,000.00
206. 
Tennessee ............
Construction 
of 
visitors 
center 
on 
Cherohala Skyway, a scenic byway, in 
Monroe County.
$100,000.00
207. 
New York ............
Improve CR39 from NY27 to NY27A, 
Suffolk County.
$3,000,000.00
237
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
208. 
Illinois ................
Pre-construction activities IL 336 from 
Macomb to Peoria.
$1,000,000.00
209. 
New York ............
Install Improvements for Pedestrian 
Safety in the vicinity of PS 81.
$250,000.00
210. 
Minnesota ...........
Cedar Lake Regional Trail Extension, 
Minneapolis.
$3,000,000.00
211. 
Tennessee ............
Modification of existing interchange on 
I-81 at SR-341/SR-66 located in Jef-
ferson County.
$500,000.00
212. 
Louisiana ...........
Upgrade 28 West from Alexandria, Lou-
isiana to Ft. Polk.
$1,500,000.00
213. 
Massachusetts .....
State Street reconstruction from Main 
Street to Saint Michael’s Cemetery, 
Springfield.
$6,000,000.00
214. 
Michigan .............
Construct road improvements to North 
Henry St. from Vermont Ave. to Wild-
er Road, Bay City.
$1,600,000.00
215. 
Illinois ................
Improve intersection of McCarthy Road, 
Derby Road, and Archer Avenue in 
Lemont, IL.
$350,000.00
216. 
Oregon ................
Agness Road, Curry County ....................
$1,000,000.00
217. 
Illinois ................
Upgrade roads in the vicinity of Robert 
Taylor Homes, Chicago.
$592,000.00
218. 
Florida ................
Widening of US Highway 17 from Zolfo 
Springs south to the DeSoto County 
line.
$2,000,000.00
219. 
Utah ....................
Atkinville Interchange, St. George ...........
$4,000,000.00
220. 
Tennessee ............
Reconstruct State Route 109 from I-40 
in Wilson County to Portland in 
Sumner County.
$1,000,000.00
221. 
Missouri ..............
I-470 and Strother Road Interchange .....
$1,000,000.00
222. 
New York ............
Improve Traffic Flow on Lefferts Boule-
vard by Rehabilitating Facilities Sur-
rounding LIRR/Kew Gardens East-
bound Station.
$500,000.00
223. 
Maine ..................
Maintenance training facilities and ve-
hicle acquisition for Kidspeace, Ells-
worth.
$500,000.00
224. 
Illinois ................
Improve Great River Road, Warsaw ......
$500,000.00
225. 
Texas ...................
Improvements to East 7th Street in Aus-
tin from I-35 to US 183.
$2,000,000.00
226. 
Illinois ................
Upgrade I-294 and I-90 and implement 
ITS projects.
$3,000,000.00
227. 
California ...........
Reconstruct interchange at I-10 and 
Riverside Avenue to improve traffic, 
Rialto.
$2,800,000.00
228. 
New Jersey .........
Rahway River Corridor Greenway Bicy-
cle and Pedestrian Path, South Or-
ange.
$400,000.00
229. 
California ...........
Construct multi-use trails at Galster 
Park that link to other local Los An-
geles County trails, West Covina.
$1,100,000.00
230. 
Arkansas .............
Improvements on County Roads 18, 32, 
33, and 16, Bradley County.
$500,000.00
231. 
Indiana ...............
Roadway improvements in Downtown 
Indianapolis.
$18,775,000.00
232. 
Ohio ....................
Geauga Co. acquisition of historic cov-
ered bridge.
$60,000.00
233. 
Oregon ................
U.S. 199/Laurel Road intersection ..........
$2,000,000.00
234. 
New York ............
Rt. 32 Corridor access management & 
improvement in Orange County - NY.
$500,000.00
238
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
235. 
Missouri ..............
Construction of interstate flyover at 
Hughes Road and Liberty Drive to 
76th Street. Part of Liberty Parkway 
Project.
$8,000,000.00
236. 
Maryland ............
Widen I-695 from I-83 to MD147. In-
cludes maintenance and interchange 
work.
$9,780,000.00
237. 
Texas ...................
Elevate Choate Road over Union Pacific 
right-of-way and SH 146. system of 
improvements to support the proposed 
Bayport Terminal Complex.
$6,600,000.00
238. 
California ...........
I-580 Castro Valley Interchange Im-
provements.
$1,200,000.00
239. 
Illinois ................
City of Washington, Mueller Road Reha-
bilitation.
$280,000.00
240. 
New York ............
Upgrade Route 17 to Interstate Stand-
ards from the Route 14 Interchange 
through Horseheads, to NY SR 13 
Interchange.
$2,000,000.00
241. 
Tennessee ............
Extension of bicycle and pedestrian 
trail, Smyrna.
$4,000,000.00
242. 
Iowa ....................
Reconstruction and expansion of the 
East 1st Street interchange on I 35, 
Ankeny.
$5,000,000.00
243. 
Ohio ....................
Construct 
transportation 
museum 
(Crawford Museum of Transportation 
and 
Industry 
at 
Aviation 
High 
School), Cleveland.
$250,000.00
244. 
Wisconsin ...........
Reconstruct Cameron Bypass on State 
Highway 8.
$3,000,000.00
245. 
Ohio ....................
Wetlands Land Preservation & Enhance-
ments in the Town of Aurora.
$750,000.00
246. 
New Jersey .........
Bridge replacement on Section 6V of 
Route 
from 
Ryders 
Lane 
to 
Milltown Road, North Brunswick.
$3,000,000.00
247. 
Arkansas .............
For acquisition and construction of an 
alternate transportation (pedestrian/ 
bicycle) trail from East Little Rock to 
Pinnacle Mountain State Park.
$800,000.00
248. 
New York ............
Construct new access road linking North 
& South sides of Rt. 17 in Town of 
Wallkill-NY.
$2,250,000.00
249. 
Texas ...................
SH 349 construction south of Lamesa 
from Intersection of SH 137.
$4,000,000.00
250. 
California ...........
Construct 4,700 ft. of medians to im-
prove safety/congestion on Imperial 
Highway from Valley View to Tele-
graph Road, La Mirada.
$700,000.00
251. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct additional turn 
lanes, signal upgrades, and related 
improvements at Routes 34 and 174 
intersection in Cumberland County.
$580,000.00
252. 
Maine ..................
Construction and snowmobile safety ac-
commodations for Route 116 Bridge. 
Medway.
$4,000,000.00
253. 
Pennsylvania .....
Bedford Springs Project, Bedford, PA: 
Relocation of Old Route 220 and 
Sweet Root Road. Complete prelimi-
nary and final engineering, purchase 
of right-of-way, and begin construc-
tion.
$3,150,000.00
239
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
254. 
Michigan .............
Geddes Road at Superior Road Round-
about, Washtenaw County.
$750,000.00
255. 
Minnesota ...........
Construct Paul Bunyan Trail from Mis-
sissippi River Bridge Trail to Crow 
Wing State Park.
$600,000.00
256. 
California ...........
Improvements (including arterial street 
rehabilitation) to enhance traffic and 
pedestrian safety in Sylmar, Lake 
View Terrace, and Mission, Los Ange-
les.
$1,250,000.00
257. 
Kentucky .............
Widen and reconstruct Mason’s Gap Rd. 
(KY 698), Lincoln County.
$500,000.00
258. 
Pennsylvania .....
Reconstruction of SR 2001 Sec. 401 
from the intersection of SR 2001 and 
U.S. 209 Bushkill Township north. 
Pike County.
$2,000,000.00
259. 
Texas ...................
Construct a 4-lane urban roadway, 
along with reconstructing a bridge 
over UP RR on Ritchie Road, 
McLennan County.
$4,000,000.00
260. 
North Carolina ...
Construct grade separated crossing at 
Sugar Creek Road of NC Railroad-
Norfolk Southern Railroad.
$4,000,000.00
261. 
Illinois ................
Complete Stage III of reconstruction of 
the 
Naperville 
Road-Warrenville 
Road/I-88 interchange.
$2,150,000.00
262. 
Wisconsin ...........
Widen State Highway 10 from City of 
Marshfield to City of Stevens Point.
$20,000,000.00
263. 
Texas ...................
Widening of 16-mile two-lane gap on 
SH 24 to four lanes from SH 19 in 
Cooper.
$3,000,000.00
264. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct interchange and 
related improvements at I-83, Exit 18, 
or other projects selected by York 
County, Pennsylvania MPO.
$6,000,000.00
265. 
California ...........
Implement Manor Drive overpass im-
provement, Pacifica.
$800,000.00
266. 
Maryland ............
Indian Head Highway Upgrades--De-
sign for upgrades to MD 210 to re-
place intersections with grade sepa-
rated interchanges from MD 228 to I-
495.
$5,000,000.00
267. 
Texas ...................
Improvements to FM 676, Alton .............
$500,000.00
268. 
California ...........
Construct pedestrian streetscape im-
provements on Ocean Blvd and Ana-
heim Street in Long Beach, including 
lighting landscaping and irrigation, 
and seating, drinking fountains, bicy-
cle racks and trash receptacles.
$1,500,000.00
269. 
Wisconsin ...........
Replace 17th Street Lift Bridge, Two 
Rivers, WI.
$6,000,000.00
270. 
California ...........
Conduct Study and Construct I 205/ 
Chrisman Road Interchange Project, 
Tracy, CA.
$1,000,000.00
271. 
Alabama .............
New freeway connector from Dothan, AL 
to the FL border.
$5,000,000.00
272. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct widening of PA 
Route 94 from York/Adams County 
line to Elm Street, Hanover.
$3,000,000.00
273. 
California ...........
First Street Bridge realignment, Los An-
geles.
$1,250,000.00
240
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
274. 
Ohio ....................
Construct a proposed relocation of US 
22 and SR 93 from the current IR 70, 
US 40 west of Zanesville.
$10,000,000.00
275. 
South Carolina ..
Construct Bishopville Bypass, Lee Coun-
ty.
$4,000,000.00
276. 
Virginia ..............
Widening I-95 between Fairfax County 
Pkwy and Rt. 123.
$5,150,000.00
277. 
Oregon ................
Study the feasibility of widening US 26 
from its interchange with Oregon 
Highway 217 in Beaverton to the 
Cornelius Pass exit.
$750,000.00
278. 
Louisiana ...........
Leeville Bridge ..........................................
$2,250,000.00
279. 
New York ............
Implement Central NY grade crossing 
and grade separation project.
$2,000,000.00
280. 
Georgia ...............
Widen Godby road to HWY 314 to 
widen an east-west corridor to connect 
three counties, Clayton County.
$2,500,000.00
281. 
Florida ................
SR710 Expansion and Improvements in 
Palm Beach County, FL.
$2,000,000.00
282. 
Iowa ....................
Complete final segment of MLK Park-
way West Project, and complete four 
segments of MLK Parkway East 
Project, Des Moines.
$9,000,000.00
283. 
Arkansas .............
Resurface Jack Creek Road, Logan 
County.
$200,000.00
284. 
California ...........
Upgrade San Fernando Road corridor to 
include traffic calming measures, Los 
Angeles.
$7,500,000.00
285. 
Georgia ...............
Sidewalk revitalization project in down-
town Eastman.
$593,175.00
286. 
North Carolina ...
Conversion of the American Tobacco 
Trail for use as bike/pedestrian trail, 
Durham/Chatham counties.
$2,000,000.00
287. 
Texas ...................
Lamesa Bypass - US 87 N to near 
US180.
$6,500,000.00
288. 
Michigan .............
Bridge connecting to East Marshall By-
pass Road in East Marshall, crossing 
the Kalamazoo River and Norfolk 
South Railroad.
$300,000.00
289. 
Texas ...................
Widen Washington Blvd. from Langham 
Rd. to FM 364.
$2,592,000.00
290. 
Illinois ................
Improve roads and bridges, Illinois ........
$10,000,000.00
291. 
New York ............
Multi-modal project in Downtown Flush-
ing, Queens.
$1,000,000.00
292. 
New Jersey .........
Rt. 139 Bridge Rehabilitation, Hoboken 
$2,000,000.00
293. 
Louisiana ...........
Belle Chasse Tunnel ..................................
$500,000.00
294. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition 
and reconstruction of Main Street in 
the vicinity of Parsonage Street, City 
of Pittston.
$250,000.00
295. 
Wisconsin ...........
Pioneer Road Rail Grade Separation, 
Fond du Lac, WI.
$4,000,000.00
296. 
Michigan .............
Holmes Road Reconstruction - From 
Prospect Road to Michigan Avenue, 
Charter Township of Ypsilanti.
$2,000,000.00
297. 
Georgia ...............
Improvement and expansion of Camp 
Creek Road at Enon road, Fulton 
County.
$1,000,000.00
298. 
New York ............
Seeks to provide direct access from I-81 
to Fort Drum gates; 1st phase of larg-
er Northern Tier Expressway (linking 
I-81 to I-87).
$6,000,000.00
241
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
299. 
Tennessee ............
Bicycle and pedestrian trail, Eagleville
$100,000.00
300. 
California ...........
Widen Boulder Avenue Bridge in High-
land.
$1,000,000.00
301. 
Tennessee ............
Reconstruct and Widen US-64 from a 
two-lane to a four-lane facility.
$5,225,000.00
302. 
Wisconsin ...........
Widen US 51/State Highway 29 .............
$8,000,000.00
303. 
Minnesota ...........
Replace and Realign the Sauk Rapids 
Bridge and approaches in St. Cloud 
and Sauk Rapids.
$3,000,000.00
304. 
Ohio ....................
Widen Pearl Road, Strongsville ..............
$1,600,000.00
305. 
Nevada ................
I-80 Interchange at Nevada Pacific 
Parkway, Fernley, Nevada. Will ben-
efit commuting employees of NAS 
Fallon.
$1,000,000.00
306. 
Ohio ....................
Replace and improve Mill Street Bridge, 
Akron.
$2,000,000.00
307. 
Pennsylvania .....
Complete a half diamond interchange at 
PA-309 and Norristown Rd. by the 
Montgomery County Planning Com-
mission.
$4,000,000.00
308. 
Texas ...................
South 
McColl 
Extension 
between 
Oragewood and Military Highway, 
Hidalgo County.
$2,500,000.00
309. 
New York ............
Improve downtown streets, Saugerties ....
$1,000,000.00
310. 
Mississippi .........
Upgrade roads in Arcola, Greenville, 
and Hollandale (U.S. Highway 61 
and 18), Washington County.
$1,800,000.00
311. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct the relocation of 
U.S. 11 northbound between Ridge 
Hill and Hempt Roads and around 
New Kingstown.
$5,680,000.00
312. 
New Mexico ........
Construct NM 128 from NM 31 to Texas 
State line.
$6,000,000.00
313. 
California ...........
Construct pedestrian, bicycle and ADA 
accessible boardwalks at the Pismo 
Beach Promenade, San Luis Obispo 
County.
$300,000.00
314. 
Tennessee ............
Eliminate blockage of 2 lanes on Gay 
Street in Knoxville to accommodate 
loading dock.
$2,000,000.00
315. 
Tennessee ............
Construct trail and bike path at S. 
Chickamauga Creek.
$1,600,000.00
316. 
California ...........
Resurface and construct truck lane at 
CA Hwy. 94 and Interstate 8 inter-
change, Boulevard.
$3,000,000.00
317. 
Michigan .............
Canton, Pave Cherry Hill west of Den-
ton Rd.
$2,500,000.00
318. 
Minnesota ...........
Birch Cove Rest Area, Hoyt Lakes ..........
$200,000.00
319. 
Illinois ................
Construct parking facility and undertake 
circulation enhancements at 96th and 
East Shore Drive, Oak Lawn.
$200,000.00
320. 
Pennsylvania .....
Finish missing ramps and widening at 
intersection of I-279 and I-79 in the 
Pittsburgh Airport Corridor.
$3,000,000.00
321. 
Georgia ...............
Improvements to intersection of SR 196 
and US 84 in Liberty County.
$2,000,000.00
322. 
Illinois ................
Reconstruct Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago 
$1,500,000.00
323. 
New York ............
Construction of an Intermodal transpor-
tation facility just off of the Bronx 
River Parkway’s exit 6.
$2,500,000.00
242
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
324. 
Michigan .............
Ultra thin demonstration project resur-
facing of Mitchell Road from the City 
of Petoskey limits east to Division, 
Emmet County.
$60,000.00
325. 
Florida ................
Widen U.S. 17 to 4 lanes in Putnam 
County, Florida.
$12,000,000.00
326. 
New York ............
Enhance road and transportation facili-
ties in the vicinity of the Brooklyn 
Children’s Museum.
$50,000.00
327. 
Alaska .................
Point MacKenzie in Matamuska-Susitna 
Borough plan and design road access.
$1,000,000.00
328. 
Nevada ................
Construct North Las Vegas Craig Road 
Overpass at the Union Pacific Rail-
road Crossing.
$5,500,000.00
329. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design and construct intersection and 
related upgrades on PA Routes 24 and 
124 in York County.
$1,000,000.00
330. 
Pennsylvania .....
Rail Bridge Removal and intersection 
improvements, Cameron and Paxton 
Streets, Harrisburg.
$1,400,000.00
331. 
Oregon ................
Construct sidewalks and improve storm 
drainage and gutters for the city of 
Medford, Oregon’s, Safe Walk Plan.
$1,000,000.00
332. 
New York ............
I-81 Corridor Improvements from Han-
cock Intl. Airport to and including the 
reconstruction of the Interchange at I-
690.
$3,000,000.00
333. 
Wisconsin ...........
Reroute State Highway 11 through Bur-
lington, Wisconsin.
$911,000.00
334. 
California ...........
Construct sound barriers at the I-5/S.R. 
54 Interchange, National City.
$150,000.00
335. 
Illinois ................
Reconstruction and widening of the Illi-
nois Route 60 bridge over Interstate 
94 in Lake Forest, Illinois.
$8,010,000.00
336. 
New York ............
Construction of and improvements to 
Lovejoy Avenue in Buffalo.
$1,000,000.00
337. 
Missouri ..............
Construction of replacement for Inter-
state 44 & US 65 Interchange, 
Springfield, MO.
$16,300,000.00
338. 
New York ............
Funds an intermodal transportation fa-
cility on Clarkson Avenue in Brooklyn.
$1,000,000.00
339. 
Michigan .............
Novi, Reconstruct Grand River between 
Novi Rd. and Haggerty.
$1,000,000.00
340. 
California ...........
Construct bypass along California Hwy 
101 around the town of Willits.
$8,000,000.00
341. 
New York ............
Rehabilitate bike and pedestrian path in 
Utica Marsh.
$124,000.00
342. 
Tennessee ............
Improve circuitry on vehicle protection 
device installed at railroad crossing in 
Knoxville, TN.
$57,000.00
343. 
New York ............
Develop terminal facilities for water taxi 
projects, New York City.
$4,600,000.00
344. 
Utah ....................
Northern Corridor, St. George .................
$6,000,000.00
345. 
Alaska .................
Planning and design of a bridge joining 
the Island of Gravina to the commu-
nity of Ketchikan.
$3,000,000.00
346. 
Massachusetts .....
Construct 3.5 mile Grand Trunk Trail, 
Sturbridge/Southbridge.
$750,000.00
347. 
Illinois ................
Provide a four-lane connection between 
Rt. 13 and Rt. 45 near Harrisburg.
$500,000.00
348. 
Indiana ...............
Construct US 31 Freeway Project for St. 
Joseph and Marshall Counties.
$25,000,000.00
243
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
349. 
Virginia ..............
Reconstruct Route 20 at/adjacent to 
Montpelier for entryway project.
$1,000,000.00
350. 
Michigan .............
repave Caseville Road from state high-
way M-142 to state highway M-25.
$500,000.00
351. 
Maine ..................
Plan and construct North-South Aroos-
took highways, to improve access to 
St. John Valley, including Presque 
Isle Bypass and other improvements.
$4,000,000.00
352. 
Illinois ................
Village of South Jacksonville, West 
Vandalia Road upgrades.
$800,000.00
353. 
Alabama .............
US 278, 4-laning 10.5 miles between 
Sulligent and Crews, AL.
$1,000,000.00
354. 
New York ............
Construct bicycle/pedestrian trail on old 
Mahopac RR right of way in West-
chester County- NY.
$1,000,000.00
355. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of intersection im-
provements and safety enhancements, 
Borough of Throop in Lackawanna 
County.
$250,000.00
356. 
Georgia ...............
Decatur Bikeway ......................................
$200,000.00
357. 
Virginia ..............
Repair of Commonwealth Blvd Bridge in 
Martinsville.
$500,000.00
358. 
New Mexico ........
I-25 Tramway Interchange: I-25 and 
Tramway Interchange.
$2,000,000.00
359. 
Wyoming ............
Casper West Belt Loop:Construct new 
connector route between Highway 220 
and US 20-26.
$2,000,000.00
360. 
Maryland ............
Hughesville Bypass--relocation of MD 5 
from end of divided highway south of 
Hughesville to end of the divided high-
way north of Hughesville.
$10,000,000.00
361. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construct the widening of PA 94 from 
the Adams/York County line north to 
Appler Road in Adams County.
$1,500,000.00
362. 
Arkansas .............
Upgrade Nevada County Roads 7, 4, 17, 
and 6.
$400,000.00
363. 
Oregon ................
Preliminary engineering and construc-
tion of a railroad crossing at the 
intersection of Havlik Drive and 
Highway 30, Scappoose.
$200,000.00
364. 
Tennessee ............
Widen SR-36 to five lanes in Wash-
ington County.
$1,000,000.00
365. 
Ohio ....................
SR 20/Mentor Rd. road widening and 
safety improvements in the Town of 
Painesville.
$350,000.00
366. 
Missouri ..............
Improve intersection of the I-44 and 
Missouri Route 100 interchange and 
the Shaw Nature Reserve Access near 
Gray Summit, Missouri.
$500,000.00
367. 
Georgia ...............
Resurface and widen Jac-Art Road as 
part of Bleckley County Development 
Authority project.
$200,000.00
368. 
New Jersey .........
Widens the intersection, replaces bridge 
structures and improves other road 
segments leading to the intersection 
NJ Route 57/ CR Route 519 in War-
ren County.
$2,700,000.00
369. 
Illinois ................
Widen U.S. Route 67 from Macomb to 
Illinois 101.
$3,000,000.00
244
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
370. 
Minnesota ...........
To expand Stearns County Road 4 from 
4 to six lanes and realign Stearns 
County Road 134.
$2,000,000.00
371. 
Tennessee ............
Extension of SR-449 in Sevier County, 
now under construction.
$500,000.00
372. 
South Carolina ..
Construction to improve Assembly Street 
between Pendleton Street and the Wil-
liams-Brice 
stadium 
to 
eliminate 
roadway-rail.
$1,500,000.00
373. 
Alabama .............
20 mile limited access corridor from US 
highway 80 to US highway 231 and 
I-85.
$3,000,000.00
374. 
California ...........
Roadway surface improvements, street 
lighting, and storm drain improve-
ments to South Center Street from 
Baughman Road to State Route 78/
86, Westmoreland.
$800,000.00
375. 
Georgia ...............
South Lumpkin Road Trail [pedestrian, 
bicycle, jogging, safety upgrades], Co-
lumbus.
$1,000,000.00
376. 
Wisconsin ...........
Reconstruct State Highway 16 (Colum-
bus to Hwy. 26), Dodge County, WI.
$4,000,000.00
377. 
Georgia ...............
Buford Highway pedestrian safety im-
provement.
$2,500,000.00
378. 
New York ............
Construct visitor center, access road and 
parking at Sam’s Point Preserve, 
Ellenville.
$750,000.00
379. 
Texas ...................
Completion of the 3rd and 4th phases on 
the Marsha Sharp Freeway, US 82-
62. Construction between Chicago and 
Salem Avenues.
$16,000,000.00
380. 
Massachusetts .....
Westford 
Street-Wood 
Street-Rourke 
Bridge Corridor improvements, Lowell.
$750,000.00
381. 
Texas ...................
Interchange of I-10 and SH99 (the 
Grand Parkway), a multi-lane high-
way that will form a third loop 
around Houston.
$5,000,000.00
382. 
New Jersey .........
Safety 
improvements 
and 
widening 
Route 206 and CR 513 Main Street 
(Route 24).
$1,000,000.00
383. 
New York ............
Comprehensive traffic congestion mitiga-
tion study of Hauppauge Industrial 
Park and surrounding area, Suffolk 
County.
$750,000.00
384. 
Georgia ...............
SR 133 upgrade, Dougherty/Colquitt Co 
$1,000,000.00
385. 
New York ............
Construction, re-design and improve-
ments to Fargo Street in Buffalo.
$3,000,000.00
386. 
Washington .........
Spokane Advanced Traffic Management 
System Expansion: Expand existing 
Intelligent 
Transportation 
System 
(ITS) in City of Spokane.
$500,000.00
387. 
Michigan .............
M-13 Washington Avenue Streetscape 
Project - Phase II of High Priority 
Project 192 in PL 105-550, Saginaw.
$1,500,000.00
388. 
Guam ..................
Reconstruct Haga˚tn˜a River Bridges, Mu-
nicipality of Haga˚tn˜a.
$6,000,000.00
389. 
New York ............
Hopewell Junction Bypass Road in 
Town of East Fishkill- NY.
$1,000,000.00
390. 
New York ............
Implement Improvements for Pedestrian 
Safety in Bronx County.
$1,000,000.00
245
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
391. 
Illinois ................
Upgrade streets and implement traffic 
and pedestrian safety signalization 
improvements, Oak Lawn.
$7,740,000.00
392. 
California ...........
Widening on Bear Valley Pkwy, City of 
Escondido, Citrus Ave to Valley Pkwy 
and to northern city limit, local arte-
rial.
$2,000,000.00
393. 
California ...........
Reconstruction and repair of pedestrian 
walkways in and around the campus 
of 
California 
State 
University 
Northridge to improve traffic and 
safety.
$784,000.00
394. 
New York ............
Study of goods movement through I-278 
in New York City and Northern New 
Jersey to be conducted by Region II 
University Transportation Research 
Center.
$1,500,000.00
395. 
Missouri ..............
Mississippi 
Riverfront 
Bicycle/Pedes-
trian trail connecting with Columbia 
Bottom conservation area.
$300,000.00
396. 
New Jersey .........
Route 22 Sustainable Corridor Plan ......
$2,000,000.00
397. 
Minnesota ...........
Reconstruct 
Unorganized 
Township 
Road 
488 
from 
CSAH 
138, 
Koochiching County.
$1,025,000.00
398. 
New York ............
Widening and resurfacing of a one-mile 
stretch of the bicycle path from Boston 
Post Rd. to Playland Park, Rye.
$275,000.00
399. 
Arkansas .............
Construction of roadway for SE Inter-
modal, Drew/Bradley Counties.
$2,080,000.00
400. 
Virginia ..............
Widen Rt. 33 at High Street, Harrison-
burg.
$500,000.00
401. 
Indiana ...............
New road construction of Dixon Road 
from Alto Road to Greentree Lane and 
Dixon Road from Markland Avenue to 
Judson Road in Kokomo, Indiana.
$2,000,000.00
402. 
Georgia ...............
Design, right of way acquisition and 
construction of Fulton County Indus-
trial Blvd.
$2,000,000.00
403. 
Louisiana ...........
Essen Lane at I-12; Perkins Road; Cen-
tral Thruway; O’Neal Lane; LA 408 
study; and Burbank Drive; and Essen 
Park Extension in East Baton Rouge 
Parish.
$30,000,000.00
404. 
Alabama .............
Patton Island Bridge Corridor con-
necting Colbert and Lauderdale Coun-
ties.
$10,000,000.00
405. 
Pennsylvania .....
Improve Route 89 one mile north of 
Titusville.
$300,000.00
406. 
South Carolina ..
Construction of Safety Improvements 
and Beautification along I-385.
$2,000,000.00
407. 
Illinois ................
Engineering and right-of-way acquisi-
tion to widen 95th Street between 
Plainfield-Naperville 
Road 
and 
Boughton Road.
$500,000.00
408. 
Minnesota ...........
Environmental impact statement for im-
provement along the entire US 10 cor-
ridor.
$1,300,000.00
409. 
Idaho ...................
Widen US-95 from 2 to 4 lanes from 
Worley to Mica Creek.
$6,000,000.00
410. 
Kentucky .............
Rehabilitate US 127 from US 127 South 
(Hustonville Rd.) to the Mercer Coun-
ty line, Danville.
$1,000,000.00
246
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
411. 
California ...........
Improvements to increase beach access, 
prevent storm drain failure and ac-
commodate increasing pedestrian traf-
fic on The Stand, Manhattan Beach.
$2,000,000.00
412. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construct a new parking facility for the 
Cruise Terminal Transportation Cen-
ter within the Philadelphia Naval 
Business Center.
$5,000,000.00
413. 
Washington .........
To replace BNSF trestle, Sammamish 
River bridge and reconstruct SR202/
127th Pl NE and SR202/180th Ave 
NE intersections.
$2,000,000.00
414. 
New York ............
Roadway improvements in Village of 
Schuylerville, including Routes 4/32 & 
29. Includes infrastructure, mobility, 
safety and streetscape improvements.
$4,350,000.00
415. 
New York ............
Reconstruction 
of 
Route 
from 
Sickletown Road to Route 303, Rock-
land County.
$1,000,000.00
416. 
Kansas ................
Construction of a 1.5 mile new roadway 
truck route in Downs, KS.
$500,000.00
417. 
Hawaii ...............
Upgrade Farrington Highway ................
$2,800,000.00
418. 
California ...........
Upgrade Jepson Parkway at the North 
and South Access Gates of Travis Air 
Force Base and widen Vanden Road 
segment, Solano County.
$2,000,000.00
419. 
California ...........
Will 
add 
landscaping 
enhancements 
along the freeway for aesthetic pur-
poses in Ventura County.
$2,500,000.00
420. 
South Carolina ..
Palmetto Trails Project - a statewide bi-
cycle and pedestrian trails project 
connecting historic sites, important 
natural landscapes and many commu-
nities.
$2,000,000.00
421. 
Oklahoma ...........
Widen US 60 between Bartlesville and 
Pawhuska, Osage County.
$2,000,000.00
422. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of intersection im-
provements and safety enhancements, 
Borough of Moosic in Lackawanna 
County.
$250,000.00
423. 
California ...........
Construction of a .2 miles section of 
Poinsettia Lane in the City of Carls-
bad, local arterial.
$2,000,000.00
424. 
Michigan .............
Reconstruct Lake road in Ironwood from 
Margaret Street to Airport Road, Go-
gebic County.
$805,000.00
425. 
Georgia ...............
Widening of GA SR 400 from 4 lanes to 
6 lanes between Haynes Bridge Road 
and McFarland Rd.
$10,000,000.00
426. 
Illinois ................
Construct road from Rt.13 to Carterville 
Herrin Road, Herrin.
$800,000.00
427. 
Tennessee ............
Construct and Widen State Route 33 in 
Monroe County.
$5,000,000.00
428. 
Pennsylvania .....
Replace traffic signals, optimize signal 
timing devices, and install traffic 
calming devices and new signage 
through construction in Mechanics-
burg.
$1,200,000.00
429. 
Indiana ...............
1.5 mile rd ext., Allen Cnty, IN. The 
project is the 1.5 mile road extension 
from Lake Ave. to State Road 930.
$11,000,000.00
247
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
430. 
New Jersey .........
Construct Parking Facility at Union 
City Intermodal Facility.
$2,000,000.00
431. 
New York ............
Construction of and improvements to 
Union Road in West Seneca.
$1,000,000.00
432. 
Alabama .............
Birmingham Northern Beltline ...............
$20,000,000.00
433. 
Florida ................
Removal and replacement of Columbus 
Street bridge, Hillsborough County.
$750,000.00
434. 
North Carolina ...
Rerouting of Holly Springs Church 
Road (NCSR 1815) beginning near 
the intersection with Airport Road 
(NCSR 1876) to Janice Drive (NCSR 
1894) near Mount Airy in Surry 
County.
$1,000,000.00
435. 
California ...........
Implement and maintain an incident 
management system for I-880 and I-
80, Alameda and Contra Costa Coun-
ties.
$500,000.00
436. 
California ...........
Replace South Access to Golden Gate 
Bridge, San Francisco.
$6,000,000.00
437. 
California ...........
Construct an auxiliary lane on Highway 
17 between Camden and Hamilton 
Avenues, Campbell.
$12,900,000.00
438. 
California ...........
Cabot-Camino Capistrano Bridge. Con-
struction of a bridge that will connect 
highways Camino Capistrano and 
Cabot Road.
$838,690.00
439. 
California ...........
Realign State Route 79 from Gilman 
Springs Road to Domenigoni Park-
way in San Jacinto.
$2,000,000.00
440. 
Illinois ................
Construct bikepath and pedestrian walk-
way along Western Avenue; construct 
access road for West Ridge Nature 
Preserve, Chicago.
$3,000,000.00
441. 
California ...........
Pasadena Multi-modal intelligent trans-
portation system: traffic management 
center upgrade, transit management 
system, parking guidance system, the 
City of Pasadena.
$2,500,000.00
442. 
New York ............
Rehab Rt 35/202 from Bear Mtn Park-
way to Taconic Parkway in New York 
State DOT.
$1,575,000.00
443. 
Hawaii ...............
Construct Waimea Bypass .......................
$1,000,000.00
444. 
Kansas ................
Construct I-35/Lone Elm Road inter-
change and widen I-35 from 151st 
Street to 159th Street, City of Olathe.
$1,000,000.00
445. 
Texas ...................
Complete State Highway 146, Baytown
$500,000.00
446. 
New Jersey .........
Rehabilitation 
of 
West 
Broadway 
Bridge, Paterson.
$3,500,000.00
447. 
Illinois ................
Improve safety of horizontal curve on 
725th St. in Grandview Twp.
$80,000.00
448. 
Georgia ...............
New interchange on I-95 at Horsestamp 
Rd.
$5,000,000.00
449. 
Michigan .............
Implement driveway control along the 3 
lane segment of US-31 North and 
South of Honor, Michigan.
$2,500,000.00
450. 
Michigan .............
Resurface 3.51 miles of Hamilton and 
Wessel Roads, Alpena County.
$640,000.00
451. 
Mississippi .........
Pirate Cove Interchange/Access Rd:I-20 
Interchange and access roads linking 
I-20 to US Hwy 80.
$500,000.00
248
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
452. 
California ...........
Implement streetscape project on Central 
Avenue from 103rd Street to Watts / 
103rd Street Station, Watts.
$3,500,000.00
453. 
New York ............
Improvements on Lower Rd. in Town of 
Minisink-NY.
$175,000.00
454. 
Ohio ....................
Construct SR 104 into a 4 lane facility 
with a turning lane in Ross County.
$6,000,000.00
455. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of intersection im-
provements and safety enhancements, 
Borough of Old Forge in Lackawanna 
County.
$250,000.00
456. 
New York ............
Reconstruct NYS Rt. 12 (Rt 20 to 
Waterville North Village Line).
$4,927,000.00
457. 
Michigan .............
Reconstruction 
of 
Intersection 
at 
Woodside Avenue and Borton Ave-
nue,Essexville.
$960,000.00
458. 
Pennsylvania .....
US Route 13 corridor reconstruction, re-
development, and beautification in 
Bucks County.
$5,000,000.00
459. 
Maryland ............
Jones Falls Greenway (hiker/biker trail). 
Funding for Baltimore City to con-
struct Phase 2 of this urban trail.
$4,000,000.00
460. 
California ...........
Construct grade separation at State Col-
lege Blvd., Fullerton/Anaheim.
$2,000,000.00
461. 
New York ............
Reconstruction of Herald and Greeley 
Squares, New York City.
$500,000.00
462. 
Florida ................
Alternate US 19, Tyrone Blvd. at 72nd 
St., St. Petersburg.
$6,000,000.00
463. 
California ...........
Reconstruct overcrossing and interchange 
at Interstate 10 & Tippecanoe Ave in 
Loma Linda.
$4,000,000.00
464. 
Florida ................
State Road 9B / I-295 Extension and 
Connection (Duval County).
$3,500,000.00
465. 
Illinois ................
Construction of a new intersection of a 
public road at U S Route 50 in Olney.
$550,000.00
466. 
Missouri ..............
Intelligent Transportation System pilot 
deployment to enhance efficiency and 
security of cargo in Kansas City re-
gion.
$500,000.00
467. 
Connecticut .........
Widen Route 34, Derby ............................
$3,000,000.00
468. 
Texas ...................
Arlington, IH-30 at FM 157 (Collins) 
and Center Street interchange im-
provements.
$2,000,000.00
469. 
Tennessee ............
Widen State Route 62 in Knox County, 
TN.
$6,500,000.00
470. 
Massachusetts .....
Rehabilitation of Whittier Bridge which 
carries Route I-95 over the Merrimack 
between Amesbury and Newburyport.
$2,000,000.00
471. 
California ...........
Port of Hueneme Intermodal Access Im-
provement Project, including grade 
separation at Rice Avenue/State Route 
34; road widening at Hueneme Road.
$4,700,000.00
472. 
Arkansas .............
Improve County Road 75, Polk County ..
$200,000.00
473. 
Florida ................
Construction and four-laning of State 
Road 80, Hendry County.
$3,500,000.00
474. 
Ohio ....................
Improve roads and bridges, City of 
Youngstown.
$3,000,000.00
475. 
Wisconsin ...........
Reconstruct East Washington Avenue, 
Madison.
$7,050,000.00
476. 
California ...........
Widening of State Route 76 from Mel-
rose Drive to I-15.
$5,000,000.00
249
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
477. 
Nebraska .............
Planning and design of sections of the 
Heartland Expressway located in and 
around the cities of Scottsbluff and 
Gering, Nebraska.
$300,000.00
478. 
Illinois ................
ITS deployment, Cook County .................
$160,000.00
479. 
South Carolina ..
Design, acquire land, and undertake im-
provements to the South Corridor 
project from York County to City of 
Charlotte.
$2,255,000.00
480. 
Texas ...................
Making transportation corridor improve-
ments along I-69 from Palo Alto to 
the U.S-Mexico border at Brownsville 
Navigation District.
$1,500,000.00
481. 
North Carolina ...
Upgrade portions of US 220 (future I-
73/74) to interstate standards in 
Montgomery County, NC.
$2,500,000.00
482. 
Kentucky .............
Construct the main street connector be-
tween Lisa Lane and Main Street, 
Stanton.
$500,000.00
483. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construct access ramp from SR 247/SR 
1012 into Valley View Business Park, 
Lackawanna County.
$2,000,000.00
484. 
Florida ................
Construct I-95/Matanzas Woods Park-
way Interchange in Flagler County, 
Florida.
$4,000,000.00
485. 
Michigan .............
CR 515 from US2 & US41 in Rapid 
River to County Road 446 at Days 
River Road - bituminous overlay and 
joint repair, Delta County.
$320,000.00
486. 
California ...........
Construct truck lane from Britannia 
Blvd to the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, 
San Diego County.
$4,000,000.00
487. 
New York ............
Rehabilitate bridges in Tompkins Coun-
ty-Ithaca Secondary Line.
$2,500,000.00
488. 
California ...........
Improve Glendale Freeway Terminus to 
provide pedestrian access, construct 
sound barriers, and implement land-
scaping, Los Angeles.
$2,500,000.00
489. 
Pennsylvania .....
Three at grade rail crossings along Am-
trak Keystone Corridor need to be 
closed for safety reasons.
$500,000.00
490. 
New Mexico ........
Planning, design and construction of 
bikeways, walkways and underpass at 
the City of Santa Fe’s downtown 
railyard redevelopment project.
$2,000,000.00
491. 
Indiana ...............
Construct grade separated interchange at 
Hively Avenue in the City of Elkhart.
$2,000,000.00
492. 
New York ............
Erie Canalway National Heritage Cor-
ridor Transportation Enhancement 
Project.
$500,000.00
493. 
Texas ...................
Hwy 80/123 overpass at Hwy 181, 
Karnes County.
$300,000.00
494. 
New York ............
Improve uptown streets, Kingston ...........
$594,500.00
495. 
Ohio ....................
Reconstruct US Route 6, Rocky River ....
$2,000,000.00
496. 
Illinois ................
Complete 80,000 lb. truck route between 
C.H. 2 (Burma Rd.) and Il Rte 130 
in Cumberland County.
$3,000,000.00
497. 
New York ............
Realignment & rehab of Kirk Lane 
Drive in Town of Carmel-NY.
$100,000.00
498. 
Florida ................
New systems interchange ramps at SR 
417 and Boggy Creek Road in Orange 
County, Florida.
$5,000,000.00
250
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
499. 
Illinois ................
Widen U.S. Route 34 from U.S. 67 to 
Carmen Road.
$4,000,000.00
500. 
Washington .........
41st Street Bridge Widening, Everett .....
$3,500,000.00
501. 
New York ............
Improvements to Intermodal transpor-
tation facility at Fort Totten, New 
York.
$1,000,000.00
502. 
Tennessee ............
Construct pedestrian bridge in Alcoa ......
$1,000,000.00
503. 
Texas ...................
Additional right-of-way along US 71 
north of Texarkana along the Arkan-
sas-Texas state line.
$1,000,000.00
504. 
Florida ................
Shops of Sherwood Access Road, Jack-
sonville.
$1,500,000.00
505. 
Arkansas .............
Widen 
Jefferson 
Parkway, 
Jefferson 
County.
$500,000.00
506. 
Alaska .................
Make necessary improvements to Indian 
River Road in City and Borough of 
Sitka.
$2,000,000.00
507. 
California ...........
Construction of new freeway lanes, in-
cluding HOV lanes at US HWY 50 
and Empire Ranch Road, Folsom, CA.
$4,000,000.00
508. 
Arkansas .............
Hwy 65 improvements including con-
struction of passing lanes, bridge im-
provements, intersection improvements 
and other roadway improvements, 
Van Buren County.
$1,200,000.00
509. 
Missouri ..............
Relocate this portion of I-44 between 
Route D and Sugar Tree Road in 
West Phelps County.
$2,000,000.00
510. 
Iowa ....................
Phase III of the Main Street project, 
Amana.
$1,000,000.00
511. 
Florida ................
Improvements of segments of US High-
way 27 from SR 540 to SR 544 and 
from I-4 to US 192, in Polk County, 
FL.
$8,000,000.00
512. 
Tennessee ............
Upgrade circuit at gates/lights for Bris-
tol grade crossing (USDOT#731120J) 
to intelligent systems that eliminate 
current variability.
$100,000.00
513. 
New York ............
Improvements and restoration at old US 
Rt 9 & Van Cortlandt Manor in Vil-
lage of Croton on Hudson.
$2,700,000.00
514. 
Minnesota ...........
New Interchange at I-35 and CSAH 2 in 
the city of Forest Lake.
$3,000,000.00
515. 
West Virginia .....
Construct Coalfields Expressway .............
$7,200,000.00
516. 
New Jersey .........
Route 46 & Main Street, Lodi - Road-
way and Drainage Improvements.
$2,000,000.00
517. 
Nevada ................
Construct a series of 4 system-to-system 
interchanges on the Clark County 
Beltway.
$16,500,000.00
518. 
Missouri ..............
Design, Right of Way and Construction 
of Highway 13- Branson West By-
Pass, Stone County, MO.
$5,200,000.00
519. 
Tennessee ............
Reconfiguration and Removal of I-40 
and I-55 ramps to reduce heavy traf-
fic volumes on Riverside Drive.
$1,000,000.00
520. 
Pennsylvania .....
PA Route 309 roadway construction and 
signalization 
improvements 
in 
Tamaqua Borough.
$2,000,000.00
521. 
California ...........
Improve Ave 12-Fwy 99 interchange; 
create five lanes and install traffic 
signals. Construct Road 29 entrance 
east of the interchange.
$1,500,000.00
251
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
522. 
California ...........
Improve 16 roads, bridge and one bike 
path in Mariposa County.
$2,000,000.00
523. 
Pennsylvania .....
Swamp Road corridor safety and road-
way improvements.
$3,500,000.00
524. 
Alaska .................
Crooked Creek Road to the mine site at 
Donlin Creek.
$15,000,000.00
525. 
California ...........
Widen Wilmington Ave from 223rd 
street including ramp modifications, 
Carson.
$2,000,000.00
526. 
Florida ................
Route 610 Widening, Greensville County 
$500,000.00
527. 
New York ............
Install Improvements for Pedestrian 
Safety in the vicinity of St. Roberts 
Bellarmine.
$250,000.00
528. 
Hawaii ...............
H-1 Counterflow Zipper Lane .................
$4,000,000.00
529. 
Texas ...................
SH 205--Widen 2 lane to 6 lane urban 
divided highway north of SH 66 to 
SH 276.
$2,000,000.00
530. 
California ...........
Improvements 
at 
First 
Street 
and 
Erringer Road. The project will widen 
off ramps and surface streets.
$2,000,000.00
531. 
Florida ................
Construct St. Augustine to Palatka Rail 
Trail in Northeast Florida.
$2,900,000.00
532. 
Ohio ....................
Construct connector trail connecting 
Xenia to Jamestown to Washington 
Court House.
$1,000,000.00
533. 
California ...........
Construct new interchange at I-15 and 
State Route 18(Falchion Road) and 
provide new highway access to U.S. 
395.
$2,000,000.00
534. 
Illinois ................
Construct Streetscape project on Morse 
Avenue from Clark Avenue to Sheri-
dan Road, Chicago.
$2,000,000.00
535. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of street improve-
ments and safety enhancements, Bor-
ough of Plymouth in Luzerne County.
$250,000.00
536. 
Ohio ....................
Road widening and safety improvements 
to Pettibone Rd. in the City of Solon.
$3,000,000.00
537. 
New York ............
Improvement of road and bridges be-
tween 2 state highways leading to 
Stewart International Airport in New 
Windsor-NY.
$2,000,000.00
538. 
New York ............
Re-construction, re-design and improve-
ments to Ohio Street from Fuhrmann 
Boulevard to Michigan Avenue in 
Buffalo.
$8,000,000.00
539. 
New York ............
Implements traffic calming measures 
using streetscape improvements from 
Court to Smith Street.
$800,000.00
540. 
Illinois ................
Extension of Willow Creek Trail, engi-
neering of an 8-mile trail from Rock 
Cut State Park to the Long Prairie 
Trail in Caledonia, Grand Illinois 
Trail System.
$100,000.00
541. 
California ...........
Construct 
highway 
connecting 
State 
Route 78/86 and State Route 111, 
Brawley.
$10,000,000.00
542. 
New York ............
Construct 
Auburn 
New 
‘‘Connector 
Road’’ - New highway between Rt. 5 
and Rt 34.
$2,000,000.00
543. 
Kentucky .............
Reconstruct Turkeyfoot Road from Au-
tumn to Richardson.
$2,000,000.00
252
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
544. 
Georgia ...............
Stone Mountain-Lithonia bikeway and 
sidewalks.
$1,200,000.00
545. 
Washington .........
Roosevelt Extension/SR 538 at Urban 
Avenue to Cameron Way, Mount 
Vernon.
$4,000,000.00
546. 
Ohio ....................
Construct Farm Road Project, Gallia 
County.
$550,000.00
547. 
California ...........
Construction of improvements to the 
Western Placerville Interchanges on 
SR 50 between the Missouri Flat 
Road 
Over-crossing 
and 
the 
Placerville Drive under-crossing in 
and near the City of Placerville in El 
Dorado County.
$3,000,000.00
548. 
New York ............
Implement Improvements for Pedestrian 
Safety in Richmond County.
$1,000,000.00
549. 
Georgia ...............
Construction of the U.S. 411 Connector 
between U.S. 41 and I-75 in Floyd 
and Bartow Counties.
$14,000,000.00
550. 
Illinois ................
Construct streetscape project at the inter-
section of Foster and Kedzie, Chicago.
$2,220,000.00
551. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construct Campbelltown Connector, Leb-
anon County.
$2,000,000.00
552. 
Illinois ................
Complete construction of route from In-
dustrial Park Drive to Bakery Boule-
vard, DuQuoin.
$625,000.00
553. 
Iowa ....................
Extend Muscatine Mississippi River 
Levee Trail in Iowa.
$500,000.00
554. 
California ...........
Project design, environmental assess-
ment, and roadway construction of 
Lonestar Road from Alta Road to 
Enrico Fermi Drive, San Diego Coun-
ty.
$500,000.00
555. 
Minnesota ...........
Roadway improvements, City of Federal 
Dam.
$1,000,000.00
556. 
American Samoa 
Village 
road 
improvements 
for 
Launiusaelua and Ituau counties in 
the Central District.
$3,000,000.00
557. 
California ...........
Elk Horn Boulevard Widening to SR 99, 
Sacramento, CA.
$1,000,000.00
558. 
Missouri ..............
Construction of US 71 to Expressway 
status, McDonald County, MO.
$15,000,000.00
559. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construction of University Boulevard 
interchange on PA 60 Business near 
Pittsburgh International Airport.
$1,000,000.00
560. 
New York ............
Rehabilitation of North and South Ridge 
Street and Wappanocca Ave. in the 
Village of Rye Brook and City of Rye.
$2,160,000.00
561. 
Ohio ....................
Construction of a connector road between 
Orchard Land and Factory Rd in 
Beavercreek, OH.
$500,000.00
562. 
West Virginia .....
Construct I-74/74 Corridor, Mercer Co ...
$11,200,000.00
563. 
Illinois ................
Eldamain Road: Construction of the 
Eldamain Road Bridge over the Fox 
River.
$5,000,000.00
564. 
Kentucky .............
Reconstruct I-275/KY 212/KY 20 inter-
change.
$2,000,000.00
565. 
South Carolina ..
Transportation infrastructure improve-
ments in Orangeburg County.
$10,000,000.00
253
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
566. 
Georgia ...............
Phase III Streetscape [pedestrian safety 
enhancements, sidewalks, curb replace-
ment, restoration, landscaping, ADA 
compliance], Columbus.
$1,500,000.00
567. 
Alaska .................
Planning, design, and EIS of Bradfield 
Canal Road.
$2,300,000.00
568. 
Rhode Island ......
Restore and expand maritime heritage 
site, Bristol.
$1,000,000.00
569. 
New York ............
Restores Eastern Parkway by adding a 
bicycle crossing lane and traffic lights.
$3,000,000.00
570. 
Michigan .............
Study of direct highway access between 
the I-96/36th Street interchange and 
the passenger terminal of the Grand 
Rapids airport.
$900,000.00
571. 
Washington .........
Construction of .6 mile span to connect 
trail and I-5.
$5,500,000.00
572. 
North Carolina ...
Construct the US 74 Bypass around 
Shelby to add additional traffic-car-
rying capacity and enhance safety.
$5,000,000.00
573. 
Texas ...................
Improvements 
to 
I-35E/I-635 
Inter-
change.
$1,000,000.00
574. 
Illinois ................
City of Oreana ‘‘Original Town’’ road 
upgrades.
$884,000.00
575. 
Mississippi .........
Popps Ferry Road bridge, Biloxi ............
$4,000,000.00
576. 
New York ............
Improvement of Hatfield Lane in Village 
of Goshen-NY.
$400,000.00
577. 
Florida ................
Construct 
SR20/CR 
309C/SR 
100 
Connnector in Palatka, Florida.
$4,000,000.00
578. 
New York ............
This project involves a full reconstruc-
tion of all the streets in Long Island 
City surrounding 11th Street.
$2,400,000.00
579. 
Washington .........
Cultural/Interpretive Center (Hanford 
Reach National Monument) facility 
and highway offramps near I-182 and 
SR240, Richland.
$1,570,000.00
580. 
Utah ....................
Reconstruction of State Route 158 at 
Pine View Dam, Weber County, Utah.
$5,000,000.00
581. 
American Samoa 
Shoreline protection and drainage miti-
gation for Nuuli village roads.
$1,000,000.00
582. 
Minnesota ...........
Construct Pfeifer Road, remove 10 foot 
raised crossing, Twin Lakes Township.
$251,717.00
583. 
North Carolina ...
Design and construct regional shared use 
pedestrian and bicycle pathway along 
Little Sugar Creek.
$3,000,000.00
584. 
Maine ..................
Penobscot Riverfront Development for bi-
cycle trails, amenities, and traffic cir-
culation improvements, Bangor.
$2,000,000.00
585. 
Virginia ..............
Reconstruct 3 deteriorating highway 
bridges and rebuild 2 interchanges on 
Arlington Boulevard and Washington 
Boulevard.
$2,000,000.00
586. 
Tennessee ............
Constuct transportation and heritage 
museum in Townsend.
$1,000,000.00
587. 
New Jersey .........
Elizabeth Pedestrian Bicycle Project for 
the NorthAvenue/Route 1 transpor-
tation corridor.
$546,000.00
588. 
New York ............
Construct an access road and make 
drainage improvements and aesthetic 
enhancements to area between Ocean 
Parkway and Oak Beach Park.
$2,700,000.00
254
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
589. 
Virginia ..............
Blue Ridge Music Center - install light-
ing/steps, upgrade existing trail sys-
tem and equip interpretative center 
with visitor information.
$2,500,000.00
590. 
Pennsylvania .....
Design, engineering, ROW acquisition, 
and construction of the widening of 
Pennsylvania Route 443 Corridor 
Widening, Carbon County.
$1,000,000.00
591. 
Wisconsin ...........
Construct U.S. Highway 41 North of 
Lake Butte des Morts Bridge, WI.
$16,400,000.00
592. 
Missouri ..............
Extension and rehabilitation of River-
side Road (MO Route AC).
$10,000,000.00
593. 
Texas ...................
Engineering, design and construction of 
freight connector roads along F.M. 511 
at Brownsville Navigation District.
$1,000,000.00
594. 
Nevada ................
Widening of US-95 from Craig Road to 
the Clark County Beltway.
$5,000,000.00
595. 
New Jersey .........
Improve the US Interstate 78 Inter-
change at Exit 15 in Franklin Town-
ship, Union Township and Town of 
Clinton.
$1,000,000.00
596. 
Montana .............
Build Four Lane Western Bypass on US 
93 around Kalispell.
$22,000,000.00
597. 
North Carolina ...
Widen Derita Road from Poplar Tent 
Road in Concord, NC to the Cabarrus-
Mecklenburg County line.
$2,000,000.00
598. 
Ohio ....................
Replace Fulton Road Bridge, Cleveland
$1,700,000.00
599. 
Texas ...................
Pedestrian path and sidewalk improve-
ments along US 83, Rio Grande City.
$500,000.00
600. 
Texas ...................
Widen Hempstead Highway from 12th 
Street to Washington Avenue from 
four lanes to six lanes.
$2,000,000.00
601. 
California ...........
Pine Avenue extension from route 71 to 
Pomona Rincon Road in the city of 
Chino.
$8,500,000.00
602. 
Texas ...................
Providing preliminary engineering for 
and constructing a loop in and 
around Texarkana, along the US 71-I-
49 corridor.
$3,000,000.00
603. 
Michigan .............
West Michigan Regional Trail Network 
connector to link two trail systems to-
gether and to Grand Rapids.
$2,950,000.00
604. 
New York ............
Plan and construct greenway along Red 
Hook, Brooklyn waterfront, and con-
duct transportation study to improve 
pedestrian safety and air quality.
$1,440,000.00
605. 
North Carolina ...
Installation of ITS devices along I-85 
from North of SR 1002 to North of SR 
2120 near Spencer.
$2,200,000.00
606. 
Wisconsin ...........
Construct U.S. Highway 151, Fond du 
Lac Bypass, WI.
$3,000,000.00
607. 
Nevada ................
Meadowood Interchange: will mitigate 
traffic congestion on Interstate and 
arterials in Reno’s primary retail 
center. State Priority.
$2,000,000.00
608. 
Illinois ................
Improve roads, Village of Forest Park ....
$750,000.00
609. 
California ...........
Reconstruct 
152/156 
Interception 
Project, Santa Clara County, CA.
$1,000,000.00
610. 
Rhode Island ......
Restoration of Canal at John Chafee 
Blackstone River Valley Heritage Cor-
ridor.
$500,000.00
255
High Priority Projects—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
611. 
Illinois ................
Widen and resurface South Wall St, 
Carbondale.
$700,000.00
612. 
New York ............
Intermodal 
transportation 
improve-
ments, Coney Island.
$3,600,000.00
613. 
Texas ...................
Construct landscaping and other pedes-
trian amenities in segments of the Old 
Spanish Trail and Griggs Road 
rights-of-way.
$2,000,000.00
614. 
Pennsylvania .....
Construct Route 219 Bypass in the City 
of Bradford.
$2,000,000.00
615. 
Minnesota ...........
Reconstruct Sucker Bay Road, Cass 
County.
$2,500,000.00
616. 
Illinois ................
Baseline 
Rd. 
Improvement 
(Mont-
gomery): Reconstruction and realign-
ment of Baseline Road.
$2,080,000.00
617. 
New Jersey .........
Replace steep grade and dangerous two 
lane bridge on Schooley’s Mountain 
Road.
$1,000,000.00
618. 
South Carolina ..
Fire Station Road Bridge in Anderson 
County.
$230,000.00
619. 
Georgia ...............
Uptown Jogging, Bicycle, Trolley Trail 
[pedestrian, bicycle, jogging, safety 
upgrades, trolley lane, skating trail], 
Columbus.
$1,425,000.00
620. 
Ohio ....................
Construct turn lane, install traffic light, 
and reorient traffic on SR 146 near 
Bussemer Lane in Muskingum County.
$600,000.00
621. 
New York ............
Funds an intermodal transportation fa-
cility on Brooklyn Avenue.
$1,400,000.00
622. 
Missouri ..............
Highway 350 upgrade through Raytown 
$1,000,000.00
623. 
Kansas ................
Construction of a two-lane on a four-
lane right of way bypass with con-
trolled access on US-400 at Dodge 
City.
$12,800,000.00
624. 
Illinois ................
Extends MacArthur Blvd. from Wabash 
to Iron Bridge Road in Springfield.
$1,500,000.00
625. 
Minnesota ...........
Upgrade CSAH 21 to a 4 Lane divided 
roadway with left turn lanes at public 
streets in Scott County.
$1,000,000.00
626. 
Virginia ..............
Chestnut Mountain Road - feasibility 
study, design and construction start 
for road improvement on National 
Forest lands.
$1,000,000.00
627. 
Michigan .............
Walled Lake, Decker Rd. between Maple 
and S. Commerce.
$125,000.00
628. 
Tennessee ............
Widen State Route 30 from Athens to 
Etowah.
$5,758,000.00
629. 
California ...........
Construction of interchange at State 
Hwy 86 at Ave 66 in Coachella, CA.
$4,500,000.00
630. 
Illinois ................
Improve roads and enhance area in the 
vicinity of South Archer Avenue and 
Midway Airport, Chicago.
$5,500,000.00
631. 
New Mexico ........
Reconstruction of I-40 west of Gallup to 
maintain safety and travelability of I-
40.
$1,500,000.00
632. 
California ...........
Construct off ramp at Interstate 8/Impe-
rial Avenue Interchange, El Centro.
$3,000,000.00
633. 
Michigan .............
Dynamite 
Hill 
Road 
demonstration 
whitetoping on rural major collector 
leading to industrial park, Baraga 
County.
$200,000.00