datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 662
To limit United States contributions to the United Nations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Foreign Affairs
A BILL
To limit United States contributions to the United Nations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the ag-
gregate amount of assessed and voluntary contributions
by the United States to the United Nations and its affili-
ated agencies for any calendar year after 1986 shall not
exceed an amount which bears the same ratio to the total
budget of the United Nations and its affiliated agencies
as the total population of the United States bears to the
total population of all the member states of the United
Nations.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 663
To repeal the provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which provides
that the accumulated earnings tax shall be applied without regard to
the number of shareholders in the corporation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To repeal the provision of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 which provides that the accumulated earnings tax
shall be applied without regard to the number of share-
holders in the corporation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) subsection (c) of section 532 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 is hereby repealed.
(b) The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply to
taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.
Æ
(c)(1) The amendments made by this section shall
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.
(2) Any amount which (but for the repeal made by
subsection (a)(1)) would have been treated as a capital
loss under section 1212 of such Code for the taxpayer’s
first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1993,
shall, notwithstanding such repeal, be so treated.
Æ
$5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years from 2014 through 
2019. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:05 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1709.IH
H1709
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IB
Union Calendar No. 260
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 665
[Report No. 103–468]
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that fraud against insur-
ance companies will be subject to strong Federal criminal and civil
penalties.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. DINGELL (for himself and Mr. BROOKS) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
MARCH 25, 1994
Additional sponsors: Mr. BONIOR and Mr. POMEROY
MARCH 25, 1994
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that
fraud against insurance companies will be subject to
strong Federal criminal and civil penalties.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 666
To amend the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide that any rescis-
sion of budget authority proposed by the President take effect unless
specifically disapproved by the adoption of a joint resolution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. DORNAN (for himself and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which
was referred jointly to the Committees on Government Operations and Rules
A BILL
To amend the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide
that any rescission of budget authority proposed by the
President take effect unless specifically disapproved by
the adoption of a joint resolution.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF DEFINITION OF RESCISSION
BILL.
Paragraph (3) of section 1011 of the Impoundment
Control Act of 1974 is amended by striking out ‘‘rescinds,
in whole or in part,’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘ex-
presses its disapproval of’’.
SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR OBLI-
GATION.
Subsection (b) of section 1012 of the Impoundment
Control Act of 1974 is amended by striking out ‘‘rescind-
ing all or part of’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘dis-
approving the rescission of’’.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendments made by this Act shall take effect
with respect to fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1993.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 667
To enhance the readiness, discipline, good order, and morale of the Armed
Forces by providing by law for the continuation of the policy of the
Department of Defense on homosexuals serving in the Armed Forces,
as in effect on January 1, 1993.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. DORNAN (for himself, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. HUNTER, and Mr. SAM
JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Armed Services
A BILL
To enhance the readiness, discipline, good order, and morale
of the Armed Forces by providing by law for the continu-
ation of the policy of the Department of Defense on
homosexuals serving in the Armed Forces, as in effect
on January 1, 1993.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF JANUARY 1, 1993, DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE POLICY CONCERNING
SERVICE OF HOMOSEXUALS IN THE ARMED
FORCES.
All executive orders, Department of Defense direc-
tives, and regulations of the military departments concern-
ing the appointment, enlistment, and induction, and the
retention, of homosexuals in the Armed Forces of the
United States, as in effect on January 1, 1993, shall re-
main in effect with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Marine Corps unless changed by law.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 668
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove the limitation
on the deductibility of capital losses.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 27, 1993
Mr. DORNAN of California introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove
the limitation on the deductibility of capital losses.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) the following provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 are hereby repealed:
(1) Section 165(f).
(2) Section 172(d)(2).
(3) Part II of subchapter P of chapter 1.
(b) The table of parts for subchapter P of chapter
1 of such Code is amended by striking the item relating
to part II.
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 66
To amend title 39, United States Code, to exempt veterans’ organizations
from regulations prohibiting the solicitation of contributions on postal
property.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1993
Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Post Office and Civil Service
A BILL
To amend title 39, United States Code, to exempt veterans’
organizations from regulations prohibiting the solicitation
of contributions on postal property.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 403 of title 39, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(d)(1) For the purpose of this subsection—
‘‘(A) the term ‘veterans’ organization’ means an
organization described in section 501(c)(19) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
‘‘(B) the term ‘postal property’ means any real
property under the charge or control of the Postal
Service, including any real property leased by or for
the Postal Service.
‘‘(2) The Postal Service shall take appropriate meas-
ures to ensure that nothing in its regulations shall prevent
a veterans’ organization from soliciting contributions on
postal property, so long as those activities do not impede
or disturb—
‘‘(A) postal employees in the performance of
their duties; or
‘‘(B) the general public in transacting business
or obtaining services provided on such property.’’.
Æ
185
HR 6 EAS
‘‘(A) are consistent with the State plan de-
scribed in section 1505(a); and
‘‘(B) concentrate on providing participants
with the knowledge and skills needed to make a
successful transition to further education or em-
ployment.
‘‘(2) USES.—Such programs and projects—
‘‘(A) may include the acquisition of equip-
ment;
‘‘(B) shall be designed to support edu-
cational services that—
‘‘(i) except for institution-wide projects
under section 1507, are provided to children
identified by the State agency as failing, or
most at risk of failing, to meet the State’s
challenging State content standards and
challenging 
State 
student 
performance
standards;
‘‘(ii) supplement and improve the
quality of the educational services provided
to such children by the State agency; and
‘‘(iii) afford such children an oppor-
tunity to learn such standards;
‘‘(C) shall be carried out in a manner con-
sistent with section 1120(b) and part G; and
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1103 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to provide that Alexander 
Creek, Alaska, is and shall be recognized as an eligible Native village 
under that Act, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 12, 2013 
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to pro-
vide that Alexander Creek, Alaska, is and shall be recog-
nized as an eligible Native village under that Act, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. ALEXANDER CREEK VILLAGE RECOGNITION. 
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
05:55 Mar 16, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1103.IH
H1103
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
identified in chapter 91 of title 31, United 
States Code. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘Alexander Creek’ means Alex-
ander Creek, Incorporated, an Alaska Native Group 
corporation organized pursuant to this Act prior to 
the enactment of this section, but subsequent to en-
actment of this section means Alexander Creek, In-
corporated, an Alaska Native Village corporation 
recognized and organized pursuant to section (a). 
‘‘(3) The term ‘Region’ means Cook Inlet Re-
gion Incorporated, an Alaska Native Regional Cor-
poration, which is the appropriate Regional Corpora-
tion for Alexander Creek under section 1613(h) of 
this Act. 
‘‘(c) ORGANIZATION
OF ALEXANDER CREEK.—As 
soon as practicable after enactment of this section, Alex-
ander Creek shall cause to be filed— 
‘‘(1) any amendments to its corporate charter 
in the State of Alaska necessary to convert from a 
Native group to a Native Village corporation; and 
‘‘(2) if necessary, any amendments to its cor-
porate charter and governing business documents 
that fulfill the terms of the agreement authorized 
under this Act. 
‘‘(d) NEGOTIATIONS.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:42 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1103.RH
H1103
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TIONS;’’ after ‘‘RESPONSIBILITIES OF AGENCY 
HEADS;’’; 
(B) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub-
section (c); and 
(C) by inserting after subsection (a) the 
following: 
‘‘(b) The head of each agency shall ensure that advice 
and recommendations of an advisory committee that re-
ports to the agency are the result of the advisory commit-
tee’s judgment, independent from the agency. Each advi-
sory committee shall include a statement describing the 
process used by the advisory committee in formulating the 
advice and recommendations when they are transmitted 
to the agency.’’; and 
(2) in section 10— 
(A) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘; 
CHAIR’’ after ‘‘ATTENDANCE’’; and 
(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the 
following new subsection: 
‘‘(g) The Chair shall not be an employee of the agen-
cy to which the advisory committee reports, unless di-
rected to chair a meeting by the head of the agency.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:26 Mar 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1104.IH
H1104
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IB 
Union Calendar No. 520 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 1103 
[Report No. 113–689] 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to provide that Alexander 
Creek, Alaska, is and shall be recognized as an eligible Native village 
under that Act, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 12, 2013 
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
DECEMBER 22, 2014 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:20 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H1103.RH
H1103
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to pro-
vide that Alexander Creek, Alaska, is and shall be recog-
nized as an eligible Native village under that Act, and 
for other purposes. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:42 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H1103.RH
H1103
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. ALEXANDER CREEK VILLAGE RECOGNITION. 
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘SEC. 43. ALEXANDER CREEK VILLAGE RECOGNITION. 
‘‘(a) RECOGNITION OF THE VILLAGE OF ALEXANDER 
CREEK.—Subject to the limitations of this section and 
notwithstanding section 1432(d) of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act (Public Law 96–487) 
and any conveyance or agreement in furtherance thereof 
or thereto, to the contrary, Alexander Creek, located with-
in Township 15N, Range 7W, Seward Meridian, Alaska, 
is and shall be recognized as an eligible Native village 
under section 11(b)(3) of this Act. 
‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section, 
the following terms apply: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘agency’ includes— 
‘‘(A) any instrumentality of the United 
States; 
‘‘(B) any element of an agency; and 
‘‘(C) any wholly owned or mixed-owned 
corporation of the United States Government 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:42 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1103.RH
H1103
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
370
HR 6 EAS
to comprehensive effective instructional strategies,
outcomes-based curriculum and parenting practices;
‘‘(6) the eligible telecommunications partnership
will—
‘‘(A) provide a comprehensive range of
courses for educators to teach instructional strat-
egies for students with different skill levels;
‘‘(B) provide training to participating edu-
cators in ways to integrate telecommunications
courses into existing school curriculum; and
‘‘(C) provide instruction for students, teach-
ers, and parents;
‘‘(7) the eligible telecommunications partnership
will serve a multistate area;
‘‘(8) the eligible telecommunications partnership
will give priority to the provision of equipment and
linkages to isolated areas;
‘‘(9) a telecommunications entity (such as a sat-
ellite, cable, telephone, computer, or public or private
television stations) will participate in the partnership
and will donate equipment or in kind services for
telecommunications linkages; and
‘‘(10) the eligible telecommunications partner-
ship will, in providing services with assistance under
this part, meet the needs of groups of individuals tra-
748
HR 6 EAS
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in
subparagraphs (B) through (F), the term ‘Fed-
eral property’ means real property that is not
subject to taxation by any State or any political
subdivision of a State due to Federal agreement,
law, or policy, and that is—
‘‘(i) owned by the United States or
leased by the United States from another
entity;
‘‘(ii)(I) held in trust by the United
States for individual Indians or Indian
tribes;
‘‘(II) held by individual Indians or In-
dian tribes subject to restrictions on alien-
ation imposed by the United States;
‘‘(III) conveyed at any time under the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to a
Native individual, Native group, or village
or regional corporation;
‘‘(IV) public land owned by the United
States that is designated for the sole use and
benefit of individual Indians or Indian
tribes; or
‘‘(V) used for low-rent housing, as de-
scribed in paragraph (10) that is located on
(2) Mechanisms to allow more freedom of
health benefit plans to exchange information for co-
ordinating case development and prosecution or liti-
gation efforts, without undermining patient and pro-
vider privacy protections or violating anti-trust laws.
(3) The extension to private health insurers of
administrative remedies currently available to public
insurers.
(4) Mechanisms for private insurers to organize
and finance investigation and litigation efforts when
more than one insurer may have received fraudulent
claims from a provider.
(5) Creating a model State statute for estab-
lishing State insurance fraud units and State laws to
strengthen insurers’ ability to pursue and recover
from fraudulent providers.
(6) The need for regulation of new types of
health care providers.
(7) Criteria for physician referrals to facilities
in which they (or family members) have a financial
interest.
(8) The availability of resources to law enforce-
ment authorities to combat health care fraud and
abuse.
(1) ACTUAL DAIRY PRODUCTION MARGIN.—The 
term ‘‘actual dairy production margin’’ means the 
difference between the all-milk price and the average 
feed cost, as calculated under section 1402. 
(2) ALL-MILK
PRICE.—The term ‘‘all-milk 
price’’ means the average price received, per hun-
dredweight of milk, by dairy operations for all milk 
sold to plants and dealers in the United States, as 
determined by the Secretary. 
(3) ANNUAL PRODUCTION HISTORY.—The term 
‘‘annual production history’’ means the production 
history determined for a participating dairy oper-
ation under section 1413(b) whenever the partici-
pating dairy operation purchases supplemental pro-
duction margin protection. 
(4) AVERAGE FEED COST.—The term ‘‘average 
feed cost’’ means the average cost of feed used by 
a dairy operation to produce a hundredweight of 
milk, determined under section 1402 using the sum 
of the following: 
(A) The product determined by multiplying 
1.0728 by the price of corn per bushel. 
(B) The product determined by multiplying 
0.00735 by the price of soybean meal per ton. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:29 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2498.IH
H2498
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(iv) there is an abundance of similar
significant wetlands functions and values
in or near the area in which the proposed
activity is to occur that will continue to
serve the functions lost or degraded as a
result of such activity, taking into account
the impacts of such proposed activity and
the cumulative impacts of similar activity
in the area;
‘‘(v) the temporary character of the
impacts and the use of minimization tech-
niques make compensatory mitigation un-
necessary to protect significant wetlands
values; or
‘‘(vi) a waiver from requirements for
compensatory mitigation is necessary to
prevent special hardship.
‘‘(4) MITIGATION BANKS.—
‘‘(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 6
months after the date of the enactment of this
subparagraph, after providing notice and oppor-
tunity for public review and comment, the Sec-
retary shall issue regulations for the establish-
ment, use, maintenance, and oversight of miti-
gation banks. The regulations shall be devel-
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Capital 
Access and Job Preservation Act’’. 
SEC. 2. REGISTRATION AND REPORTING EXEMPTIONS RE-
LATING TO PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS ADVI-
SORS. 
Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
(15 U.S.C. 80b–3) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(o) EXEMPTION
OF
AND REPORTING REQUIRE-
MENTS BY PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS ADVISORS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this 
subsection, no investment adviser shall be subject to 
the registration or reporting requirements of this 
title with respect to the provision of investment ad-
vice relating to a private equity fund or funds, pro-
vided that each such fund has not borrowed and 
does not have outstanding a principal amount in ex-
cess of twice its invested capital commitments. 
‘‘(2) MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS AND ACCESS 
BY COMMISSION.—Not later than 6 months after the 
date of enactment of this subsection, the Commis-
sion shall issue final rules— 
‘‘(A) to require investment advisers de-
scribed in paragraph (1) to maintain such 
records and provide to the Commission such an-
nual or other reports as the Commission taking 
into account fund size, governance, investment 
strategy, risk, and other factors, as the Com-
mission determines necessary and appropriate 
in the public interest and for the protection of 
investors; and 
‘‘(B) to define the term ‘private equity 
fund’ for purposes of this subsection.’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 
2013. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 1105 
AN ACT 
To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to 
provide a registration exemption for private eq-
uity fund advisers, and for other purposes.
‘‘Roubideau Proposed Wilderness Area’’, dated May 
31, 2011, which shall be known as the Roubideau 
Wilderness. 
(12) 
Certain 
lands 
managed 
by 
the 
Uncompahgre Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management or located in the Uncompahgre Na-
tional Forest which comprise approximately 13,288 
acres, as generally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Nor-
wood Canyon Proposed Wilderness Area’’, dated 
May 31, 2011, which shall be known as the Norwood 
Canyon Wilderness. 
(13) Certain lands managed by the San Juan 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
which comprise approximately 25,947 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘Cross Canyon Pro-
posed Wilderness Area’’, dated May 31, 2011, which 
shall be known as the Cross Canyon Wilderness. 
(14) Certain lands managed by the San Juan 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
which comprise approximately 33,467 acres, as gen-
erally depicted on a map titled ‘‘McKenna Peak Pro-
posed Wilderness Area’’, May 31, 2011, which shall 
be known as the McKenna Peak Wilderness. 
(15) Certain lands managed by the San Juan 
Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:33 Jul 03, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2552.IH
H2552
pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS