H. R. 133—1534 
feet to a point with coordinates N557009.330, E1211019.522, thence 
running S01 46’58.08’’W approximately 578 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556431.405, E1211001.534, thence running S49 
49’50.23’’W approximately 69 feet to a point with coordinates 
N556387.076, E1210949.002, thence running S51 53’0.25’’E approxi-
mately 35 feet to a point with coordinates N556365.662, 
E1210976.316, thence running S49 38’58.48’’W approximately 112 
feet to a point with coordinates N556292.989, E1210890.775, thence 
running N88 13’1.87’’W approximately 109 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556296.367, E1210782.226, thence running S46 
46’58.97’’W approximately 141 feet to a point with coordinates 
N556199.527, E1210679.164, thence running N88 13’1.77’’W 
approximately 700 feet to a point with coordinates N556221.305, 
E1209979.502, thence running N01 46’58.08’’E approximately 250 
feet to a point with coordinates N556471.184, E1209987.280, thence 
running S88 13’1.77’’E approximately 815 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556445.828, E1210801.886, thence running N01 
46’58.08’’E approximately 570 feet to the point of origin. 
SEC. 343. LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESERVOIR PERMIT REVIEW. 
Section 1119(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (33 U.S.C. 2347 note) is amended by striking ‘‘owned or 
operated by the Secretary’’. 
SEC. 344. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRON-
MENT. 
Section 1203(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (132 Stat. 3805) is amended, in the matter preceding para-
graph (1), by striking ‘‘For fiscal years 2019 and 2020’’ and inserting 
‘‘Until September 30, 2024’’. 
SEC. 345. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION. 
For fiscal years 2021 through 2024, in carrying out section 
206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330), the Secretary shall give priority to a project to restore and 
protect an aquatic ecosystem or estuary that— 
(1) is located in the South Platte River Basin; 
(2) is located on a body of water that is identified by 
the applicable State pursuant to section 303(d) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1313(d)) as being 
impaired; 
(3) has the potential to provide flood risk management 
and recreational benefits in addition to ecosystem restoration 
benefits; and 
(4) is located in a city with a population of 80,000 or 
less. 
SEC. 346. SURPLUS WATER CONTRACTS AND WATER STORAGE AGREE-
MENTS. 
Section 1046(c)(3) of the Water Resources Reform and Develop-
ment Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1254; 132 Stat. 3784) is amended 
by striking ‘‘12’’ and inserting ‘‘16’’. 
SEC. 347. NO WAKE ZONES IN NAVIGATION CHANNELS. 
Section 1149 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 
(33 U.S.C. 1223 note) amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘recreational’’ in each place it appears and 
inserting ‘‘covered’’; and
H. R. 133—1535 
(2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) COVERED
NAVIGATION
CHANNEL.—The term ‘covered 
navigation channel’ means a navigation channel that— 
‘‘(A) is federally marked or maintained; 
‘‘(B) is part of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; 
and 
‘‘(C) is adjacent to a marina. 
‘‘(2) COVERED VESSEL.—The term ‘covered vessel’ means 
a recreational vessel or an uninspected passenger vessel, as 
such terms are defined in section 2101 of title 46, United 
States Code.’’. 
SEC. 348. LIMITATION ON CONTRACT EXECUTION IN THE ARKANSAS 
RIVER BASIN. 
(a) DEFINITION OF COVERED CONTRACT.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘covered contract’’ means a contract between any local govern-
mental entity and the Secretary for water supply storage in a 
Federal or non-Federal hydropower lake within the Arkansas River 
Basin. 
(b) LIMITATION.—For any new covered contract for a hydropower 
lake that is entered into during the period beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2022, a 
local governmental entity shall not pay more than 110 percent 
of the initial principal cost for the acre-feet being sought for the 
new covered contract for that hydropower lake. 
SEC. 349. WAIVER OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF DAMAGES RELATED 
TO CERTAIN CONTRACT CLAIMS. 
In a case in which the Armed Services Board of Contract 
Appeals or other court of competent jurisdiction has rendered a 
decision during the period beginning on December 1, 2017, and 
ending on December 31, 2022, awarding damages to a contractor 
relating to the adjudication of claims arising from the construction 
of an authorized water resources development project, notwith-
standing the terms of the Project Partnership Agreement, the Sec-
retary shall waive payment of the share of the non-Federal interest 
of those damages, including attorney’s fees, if— 
(1)(A) the contracting officer was instructed by the Corps 
of Engineers to modify the terms of the contract or terminate 
the contract; and 
(B) the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or other 
court of competent jurisdiction determined that the failure of 
the contracting officer to timely take the action described in 
subparagraph (A) was a material breach of the contract that 
resulted in damages to the contractor awarded by the Armed 
Services Board of Contract Appeals or the court, as applicable; 
or 
(2) the claims arose from construction of a project deauthor-
ized under this title. 
SEC. 350. REDUCED PRICING FOR CERTAIN WATER SUPPLY STORAGE. 
Section 322 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(33 U.S.C. 2324) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘2,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘3,000,000’’; and 
(2) in subsection (g)—
H. R. 133—1536 
(A) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
‘‘; or’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘means a community’’ and inserting 
the following: ‘‘means— 
‘‘(1) a community’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) a regional water system that serves a population of 
less than 100,000, for which the per capita income is less 
than the per capita income of not less than 50 percent of 
the counties in the United States.’’. 
SEC. 351. FLOOD CONTROL AND OTHER PURPOSES. 
Section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Except as’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) RENEGOTIATION OF TERMS.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—At the request of a non-Federal 
interest, the Secretary and the non-Federal interest may 
renegotiate the terms and conditions of an eligible deferred 
payment, including— 
‘‘(i) permitting the non-Federal contribution to be 
made without interest, pursuant to paragraph (1); 
‘‘(ii) recalculation of the interest rate; 
‘‘(iii) full or partial forgiveness of interest accrued 
during the period of construction; and 
‘‘(iv) a credit against construction interest for a 
non-Federal investment that benefits the completion 
or performance of the project or separable element. 
‘‘(B) 
ELIGIBLE
DEFERRED
PAYMENT.—An 
eligible 
deferred payment agreement under subparagraph (A) is 
an agreement for which— 
‘‘(i) the non-Federal contribution was made with 
interest; 
‘‘(ii) the period of project construction exceeds 10 
years from the execution of a project partnership agree-
ment or appropriation of funds; and 
‘‘(iii) the construction interest exceeds $45,000,000. 
‘‘(3) CREDIT FOR NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to credit 
any costs incurred by the non-Federal interest (including 
in-kind contributions) to remedy a design or construction 
deficiency of a covered project or separable element toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the covered project, 
if the Secretary determines the remedy to be integral to 
the completion or performance of the covered project. 
‘‘(B) CREDIT
OF
COSTS.—If the non-Federal interest 
incurs costs or in-kind contributions for a project to remedy 
a design or construction deficiency of a project or separable 
element which has a 100 percent Federal cost share, and 
the Secretary determines the remedy to be integral to 
the completion or performance of the project, the Secretary 
is authorized to credit such costs to any interest accrued 
on a deferred non-Federal contribution. 
‘‘(4) TREATMENT
OF
PRE-PAYMENT.—Notwithstanding a 
deferred payment agreement with a non-Federal interest, the
H. R. 133—1537 
Secretary shall accept, without interest of any type, the repay-
ment of a non-Federal contribution for any eligible deferred 
payment described in paragraph (2)(B) for which— 
‘‘(A) the non-Federal interest makes a payment of at 
least $200 million for that eligible deferred payment agree-
ment on or before September 30, 2021; and 
‘‘(B) the non-Federal interest repays the remaining 
principal by September 30, 2023.’’. 
SEC. 352. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS. 
(a) CONSISTENCY WITH REPORTS.—Congress finds that the 
project modifications described in this section are in accordance 
with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under 
section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future 
Water Resources Development’’, or have otherwise been reviewed 
by Congress. 
(b) MODIFICATIONS.— 
(1) SACRAMENTO AREA, CALIFORNIA.—Section 219(f)(23) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(23) SACRAMENTO
AREA, CALIFORNIA.— $45,000,000 for 
regional water conservation, recycling, reliability, and resiliency 
projects in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties and 
the San Juan Suburban Water District, California.’’. 
(2) SOUTH PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—Section 219(f)(52) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220) is amended by striking 
‘‘ $25,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ $50,000,000’’. 
(3) MADISON AND ST. CLAIR COUNTIES, ILLINOIS.—Section 
219(f)(55) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A–221) is amended 
by striking ‘‘ $10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ $45,000,000’’. 
(4) SOUTHERN
AND
EASTERN
KENTUCKY.—Section 531 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3773; 
113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (g), by inserting ‘‘Boyd, Carter, Elliott, 
Lincoln,’’ after ‘‘Lee,’’; and 
(B) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘ $40,000,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘ $100,000,000’’. 
(5) DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Section 219(f)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 
2257; 122 Stat. 1623) is amended by striking ‘‘ $75,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘ $130,000,000’’. 
(6) JACKSON
COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Section 219 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 1494; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ‘‘water supply and’’ 
and inserting ‘‘water supply, projects for stormwater and 
drainage systems, and’’; and 
(B) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘ $32,500,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘ $57,500,000’’. 
(7) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—Section 219(f)(32) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
337; 121 Stat. 1233) is amended by striking ‘‘ $35,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘ $70,000,000’’.
H. R. 133—1538 
(8) MIDWEST CITY, OKLAHOMA.—Section 219(f)(231) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1266) is amended by striking ‘‘ 
$2,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ $5,000,000’’. 
(9) SOUTH
CENTRAL
PENNSYLVANIA.—Section 313 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 
109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 
121 Stat. 1146) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ‘‘ $200,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘ $400,000,000’’; and 
(B) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting ‘‘Beaver, Jeffer-
son,’’ after ‘‘Washington,’’. 
(10) LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220; 
117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818) is amended 
by striking ‘‘ $89,550,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ $110,000,000’’. 
(11) EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS.—Section 219(f)(269) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1268) is amended by striking ‘‘ 
$25,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ $75,000,000’’. 
(12) WESTERN RURAL WATER.—Section 595 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 
139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 
1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681) is 
amended— 
(A) by striking the section heading and inserting ‘‘western 
rural water.’’; 
(B) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘Arizona,’’ before 
‘‘rural Idaho’’; 
(C) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘Arizona,’’ before 
‘‘Idaho’’; and 
(D) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘for the period begin-
ning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000, to remain avail-
able until expended.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘, to 
remain available until expended— 
‘‘(1) for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, 
$435,000,000 for Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, 
rural Utah, and Wyoming; and 
‘‘(2) $150,000,000 for Arizona.’’. 
(13) CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.—Section 571(h) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 371; 121 Stat. 
1257) is amended by striking ‘‘ $20,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘ $100,000,000’’. 
(14) SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.—Section 340(g) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 110 Stat. 
3727; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by striking ‘‘ $40,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘ $120,000,000’’. 
(c) 
LOWELL
CREEK
TUNNEL, 
SEWARD, 
ALASKA.—Section 
5032(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public 
Law 110–114, 121 Stat. 1205) is amended by striking ‘‘15’’ and 
inserting ‘‘20’’. 
(d) CAPE ARUNDEL DISPOSAL SITE, MAINE.—Section 1312 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3821) 
is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2024’’.
H. R. 133—1539 
SEC. 353. PROJECT MODIFICATION AUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) WATER SUPPLY.—The following project modifications for 
water supply, as identified in the report entitled ‘‘Report to Congress 
on Future Water Resources Development’’ dated February 2019, 
and submitted to Congress on June 3, 2019, pursuant to section 
7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
(33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized 
to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
the recommendations included in such report pursuant to section 
301(c) of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b(c)) and 
as follows: 
(1) CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE PROJECT, 
SALT RIVER, MISSOURI.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The project for Clarence Cannon 
Dam and Mark Twain Lake Project, Salt River, Missouri, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1189; 79 Stat. 1089; 95 Stat. 1684), is modified 
to release 5,600 acre-feet of future use water supply storage 
to the Federal Government under water supply contract 
No. DACW43–88–C–0036, and future financial obligations 
for such volume of storage. 
(B) RELIEF OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS.—Upon execution 
of the amendment required by subparagraph (C), the State 
of Missouri shall be relieved of the obligation to pay the 
percentage of the annual operation and maintenance 
expense, the percentage of major replacement cost, and 
the percentage of major rehabilitation costs, of the joint 
use facilities of the project described in subparagraph (A), 
that are attributable to water supply storage space not 
being used by the State during the period before the State 
commences use of the storage space. 
(C) AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT.—The Secretary shall 
amend Water Supply Contract No. DACW43–88–C–0036, 
dated March 10, 1988, between the United States and 
the State of Missouri, to implement the modifications 
required under subparagraphs (A) and (B). 
(2) CITY OF PLATTSBURG.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for Smithville Lake, Mis-
souri, authorized pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1080), is modified to release 
the City of Plattsburg, Missouri, from— 
(i) 8,850 acre-feet of future water supply storage 
contracts; and 
(ii) future financial obligations for the volume of 
storage described in clause (i). 
(B) AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT.—The Secretary shall 
amend water supply contract No. DACW41–73–C–0008, 
between the United States and the State of Missouri, to 
implement the modifications under subparagraph (A). 
(3) CITY OF SMITHVILLE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for Smithville Lake, Mis-
souri, authorized pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1080), is modified to release 
the City of Smithville, Missouri, from— 
(i) 6,000 acre-feet of future water supply storage 
contracts; and
H. R. 133—1540 
(ii) future financial obligations for the volume of 
storage described in clause (i). 
(B) AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT.—The Secretary shall 
amend water supply contract No. DACW–41–73–C–0007, 
between the United States and the State of Missouri, to 
implement the modifications under subparagraph (A). 
(b) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.—The following project modifica-
tions for flood risk management, as identified in a report entitled 
‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development’’, 
and submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) 
or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary: 
(1) Modification of the project for flood risk management, 
lower Mississippi River, authorized by the Act of May 15, 
1928 (chapter 569, 45 Stat. 534), to incorporate the Wolf River 
Backwater and Nonconnah Creek levee systems into the project, 
authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 
688, 49 Stat. 1575; 50 Stat. 881), subject to the determination 
of the Secretary that such systems meet all requirements 
applicable to such project. 
(2) Modification of the project for flood risk management, 
Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, 
authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 
1219), to incorporate the Cherokee Park Levee into the project, 
subject to the determination of the Secretary that such levee 
meets all requirements applicable to such project. 
SEC. 354. COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR ACTIVITIES. 
(a) EXPEDITED COMPLETIONS.— 
(1) UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN.—The Secretary shall expe-
dite, in coordination with State, Tribal, and local authorities, 
the completion of maintenance and repair activities for those 
elements of the levee systems in the Upper Snake River Basin, 
authorized pursuant to the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 
179), that are operated and maintained by the Secretary. 
(2) LOWER
MISSOURI
RIVER
BASIN.—The Secretary shall 
expedite, in coordination with State and local authorities and 
stakeholders, the completion of maintenance and repair activi-
ties for those elements of the levee systems in the Lower 
Missouri River Basin, authorized pursuant to the Pick-Sloan 
Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 9(b) of 
the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 891)) 
or the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project 
(authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 
19, 59 Stat. 19)), that are operated and maintained by the 
Secretary. 
(3) COOS BAY NORTH JETTY SYSTEM, OREGON.—The Sec-
retary shall expedite, in coordination with State and local 
authorities and stakeholders, the completion of maintenance 
and repair activities for those elements of the Coos Bay North 
Jetty system, Oregon, authorized by the first section of the 
Act of January 21, 1927 (chapter 47, 44 Stat. 1014), that 
are operated and maintained by the Secretary. 
(4) INDIAN
RIVER
INLET
AND
BAY, DELAWARE.—The Sec-
retary shall expedite, in coordination with State and local 
authorities, the completion of maintenance and repair activities
H. R. 133—1541 
for the elements of the project for navigation, Indian River 
Inlet and Bay, Delaware, authorized by the Act of August 
26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 Stat. 846), that are operated and 
maintained by the Secretary. 
(b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section affects the 
responsibility of the Secretary to comply with the requirements 
of any Federal law in carrying out the activities required to be 
expedited by this section. 
SEC. 355. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.— 
(1) MUDDY
RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—The separable ele-
ments for ecosystem restoration of the project for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration, Muddy River, Brook-
line and Boston, Massachusetts, authorized by section 522 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656), 
and deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 
1345), are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject 
to subsection (b). 
(2) EAST CHESTER CREEK, NEW YORK.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a), the project for navigation, East Chester Creek, 
New York, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 164; 100 Stat. 4181), and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 1001 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579(a)), is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary, subject to subsection (b). 
(3) 
CHRISTIANSTED
HARBOR, 
UNITED
STATES
VIRGIN 
ISLANDS.—Notwithstanding section 1002 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), the portion of the 
project for navigation, Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, United 
States Virgin Islands, authorized by section 101 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 167), and deauthorized under 
section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4221), is authorized to be carried out by the Sec-
retary, subject to subsection (b). 
(4) CHARLOTTE
AMALIE
(ST. THOMAS)
HARBOR, UNITED 
STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS.—Notwithstanding section 1002 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), 
the portion of the project for navigation, Charlotte Amalie (St. 
Thomas) Harbor, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands, 
authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 
Stat. 850), and deauthorized under section 1002 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), is author-
ized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to subsection 
(b). 
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall complete and 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate a post-authorization change report 
(as such term is defined in section 1132(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2282e(d)) prior to carrying 
out a project identified in subsection (a). 
SEC. 356. CONVEYANCES. 
(a) GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.—
H. R. 133—1542 
(1) SURVEY TO OBTAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—The exact acre-
age and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
satisfactory to the Secretary. 
(2) APPLICABILITY OF PROPERTY SCREENING PROVISIONS.— 
Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
to any conveyance under this section. 
(3) COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—An entity to which a convey-
ance is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate trans-
action and environmental documentation costs, associated with 
the conveyance. 
(4) LIABILITY.—An entity to which a conveyance is made 
under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or after 
the date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. 
The United States shall remain responsible for any liability 
with respect to activities carried out, before such date, on 
the real property conveyed. 
(5) ADDITIONAL
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS.—The Secretary 
may require that any conveyance under this section be subject 
to such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary con-
siders necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of 
the United States. 
(b) EUFAULA, ALABAMA.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the City of Eufaula, Alabama, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to the real property described 
in the Department of the Army Lease No. DACW01–2–17– 
0747, containing 56.76 acres, more or less, and being a part 
of Tracts L–1268 (26.12 acres), L–1273 (13.71 acres), L–1278 
(6.75 acres), and L1279 (10.36 acres) of the Walter F. George 
Lock and Dam and Lake project. 
(2) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(3) CONSIDERATION.—The City of Eufaula, Alabama, shall 
pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the 
fair market value of the property conveyed under this sub-
section, as determined by the Secretary. 
(c) MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the City of Montgomery, Alabama, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to the real property described 
in paragraph (2). 
(2) PROPERTY.—The property to be conveyed is the 62.38 
acres of land and water under the primary jurisdiction of the 
Secretary in the R.E. ‘‘Bob’’ Woodruff Project Area that is 
covered by lease number DACW01–1–05–0037, including the 
parcels and structure known as ‘‘Powder Magazine’’. 
(3) DEADLINE.—To the extent practicable, the Secretary 
shall complete the conveyance under this subsection by not 
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 
(4) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the
H. R. 133—1543 
interests of the United States, to include retaining the right 
to inundate with water any land transferred under this sub-
section. 
(5) CONSIDERATION.—The City of Montgomery, Alabama, 
shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than 
the fair market value of the property conveyed under this 
subsection, as determined by the Secretary. 
(d) CONVEYANCE
OF WILMINGTON HARBOR NORTH DISPOSAL 
AREA, DELAWARE.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—As soon as practicable, the Secretary 
shall complete the conveyance of the Wilmington Harbor North 
Disposal Area confined disposal facility, Delaware, to the State 
of Delaware. 
(2) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(3) CONSIDERATION.—The State of Delaware shall pay to 
the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market 
value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as deter-
mined by the Secretary. 
(e) OHIO RIVER LOCK AND DAM NUMBER 52, MASSAC COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the Massac-Metropolis Port District, Illinois, all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to any real property 
located north of the south bank of the Ohio River in Massac 
County, Illinois, that is associated with the Ohio River Lock 
and Dam 52. 
(2) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(3) CONSIDERATION.—The Massac-Metropolis Port District, 
Illinois, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not 
less than fair market value of the property conveyed under 
this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. 
(f) UPPER ST. ANTHONY FALLS LOCK AND DAM, MINNEAPOLIS, 
MINNESOTA.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—As soon as practicable after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, upon 
request— 
(A) convey, without consideration, to the City of Min-
neapolis, Minnesota, or its designee, all or substantially 
all of the real property owned by the United States adjacent 
to or in the vicinity of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock 
and Dam, subject to the right of the Secretary to retain 
any easements in such property solely to the extent nec-
essary to continue to operate and maintain the Upper 
St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam; and 
(B) provide, without consideration, to the City or its 
designee— 
(i) access and use rights by license, easement, or 
similar agreement, to any real property and structures 
at the site of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and 
Dam that is not conveyed under subparagraph (A); 
and
H. R. 133—1544 
(ii) for any such property retained by the Secretary, 
exclusive license or easement over such property to 
allow the City or its designee to construct, use, and 
operate amenities thereon, and to utilize such property 
as 
a 
comprehensive 
recreational, 
touristic, 
and 
interpretive experience. 
(2) OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF LOCK AND DAM.—Owner-
ship rights to the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam 
shall not be conveyed under this subsection, and the Secretary 
shall retain all rights to operate and maintain the Upper St. 
Anthony Falls Lock and Dam. 
(3) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that the prop-
erty conveyed under this subsection is not used for a public 
purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the property 
shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United 
States. 
(4) UPPER ST. ANTHONY FALLS LOCK AND DAM DEFINED.— 
In this subsection, the term ‘‘Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock 
and Dam’’ means the lock and dam located on Mississippi 
River Mile 853.9 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
(g) CLINTON, MISSOURI.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the City of Clinton, Missouri, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
real property described in paragraph (2). 
(2) PROPERTY.—The property to be conveyed is a tract 
of land situated in the S 1⁄2 of Section 12 and the N 1⁄2 of 
Section 13, Township 41 North, Range 26 West of the Fifth 
Principal Meridian, Henry County, Missouri, more particularly 
described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection 
of the north line of said S 1⁄2 of Section 12 and the easterly 
right-of-way of State Highway No. 13; thence easterly along 
the north line of said S 1⁄2 to the northeast corner of the 
W 1⁄2 NW 1⁄4 NE 1⁄4 SW 1⁄4 of said Section 12; thence southerly 
along the east line of said W 1⁄2 NW 1⁄4 NE 1⁄4 SW 1⁄4 to 
the southeast corner thereof; thence easterly along the north 
line of the S 1⁄2 NE 1⁄4 SW 1⁄4 of said Section 12 to the 
southwest corner of the W 1⁄2 NW 1⁄4 NW 1⁄4 SE 1⁄4 of said 
Section 12; thence in a northeasterly direction to the northeast 
corner of said W 1⁄2 NW 1⁄4 NW 1⁄4 SE 1⁄4 ; thence easterly 
along the north line of said S 1⁄2 to the westerly right-of- 
way of the County Road; thence in a southeasterly and south-
erly direction along the westerly right-of-way of said County 
Road approximately 2500 feet to the center of Deer Creek; 
thence in a southwesterly direction along the center of said 
Deer Creek, approximately 3900 feet to the south line of said 
N 1⁄2 of Section 13; thence westerly along the south line of 
said N 1⁄2 to the easterly right-of-way line of the St. Louis- 
San Francisco Railroad; thence in a northwesterly direction 
along the easterly right-of-way of said railroad to the easterly 
right-of-way of said State Highway No. 13; thence in a north-
easterly direction along the easterly right-of-way of said State 
Highway No. 13 to the point of the beginning; and including 
a roadway easement for ingress and egress, described as a 
strip of land 80 feet in width, lying 40 feet on each side 
of the following described line, the initial extremities of the 
following described strip being extended or reduced as required
H. R. 133—1545 
to exactly adjoin the boundary lines which they meet, situated 
in the S 1⁄2 of Section 12, Township 41 North Range 26 West 
of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Henry County, Missouri, more 
particularly described as follows: Commencing at the center 
of said Section 12, thence Sl°24’56’’W, 1265.52 feet to a point, 
thence N88°29’02’’W, 483.97 feet to the point of beginning of 
the strip of land herein described; thence in a northeasterly 
direction along a curve to the right, said curve having an 
initial tangent bearing of N3°44’4l’’E, a radius of 238.73 feet 
and an interior angle of 61°29’26’’, an arc distance of 256.21 
feet to a point; thence N65°14’07’’E 218.58 feet to a point; 
thence in a northeasterly direction along a curve to the left, 
having a radius of 674.07 feet and an interior angle of 36°00’01’’, 
an arc distance of 423.53 feet to a point; thence N29°14’07’’E, 
417.87 feet to a point; thence northeasterly along a curve to 
the right, having a radius of 818.51 feet and an interior angle 
of 14°30’01’’, an arc distance of 207.15 feet to a point; thence 
N43°44’07’’E, 57.00 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of 
a county road, containing 2,948 acres, more or less; Excluding 
therefrom a tract of land situated in the S 1⁄2 of said Section 
12, said Township and Range, described as commencing at 
the center of said Section 12; thence S1°24’56’’W, 1265.52 feet 
to the point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; 
thence N88°29’02’’W, 1122.50 feet; thence S1°43’26’’W, 872.62 
feet; thence S88°29’02’’E, 1337.36 feet; thence Nl°43’26’’E, 
872.62 feet; thence N88°29’02’’W, 214.86 feet to the point of 
beginning, containing 26.79 acres, more or less. The above 
described tract contains, in the aggregate, 177.69 acres, more 
or less. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(4) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that the prop-
erty conveyed under this subsection is not being used for a 
public purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the prop-
erty shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the 
United States. 
(h) CITY OF CLINTON, OLD ORCHARD ADDITION, MISSOURI.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the City of Clinton, Missouri, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to the real property described 
in paragraph (2). 
(2) PROPERTY.—The property to be conveyed is Lot 28 in 
Old Orchard Addition, a subdivision of the City of Clinton, 
Henry County, Missouri, containing 0.36 acres, more or less, 
including any improvements thereon. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States, including such reservations, 
terms, and conditions as the Secretary determines necessary 
to allow the United States to operate and maintain the Harry 
S. Truman Reservoir Project. 
(4) CONSIDERATION.—The City of Clinton, Missouri, shall 
pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the
H. R. 133—1546 
fair market value of the property conveyed under this sub-
section, as determined by the Secretary. 
(i) TRI-COUNTY LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the Tri-County Levee District, Missouri, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the real property 
described in paragraph (2). 
(2) PROPERTY.—The property to be conveyed is the part 
of Sections 1 and 12 Township 45 North Range 6 West of 
the 5th P.M. in Montgomery County, Missouri, described as 
follows: A tract of land being 60’ wide and lying South and 
East of and adjoining the centerline of the existing levee and 
being described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner 
of Section 12, thence S 87° 52’ 35’’ E 587.4’, thence S 01° 
29’ 25’’ W 453.68’ to the point of the beginning; said point 
being in the center of the levee, thence with the centerline 
of the levee N 77° 01’ 30’’ E 164.92’, thence N 74° 26’ 55’’ 
E 250.0’, thence N 72° 27’ 55’’ E 270.0’, thence N 69° 06’ 
10’’ E 300.0’, thence N 66° 42’ 15’’ E 500.0’, thence N 64° 
14’ 30’’ E 270.0’, thence N 61° 09’ 10’’ E 800.0’, thence N 
60° 58’ 15’’ E 1724.45’, thence leaving the centerline S 01° 
10’ 35’’ W 69.43’, thence parallel with the above described 
centerline S 60° 58’ 15’’ W 1689.62’, thence S 61° 09’ 10’’ 
W 801.71’, thence S 64° 14’ 30’’ W 272.91’, thence S 66° 42’ 
15’’ W 502.55’, thence S 69° 06’ 10’’ W 303.02’, thence S 72° 
27’ 55’’ W 272.8’, thence S 74° 26’ 55’’ W 252.39’, thence S 
77° 01’ 30’’ W 181.75’, thence leaving the South side of the 
levee N 01° 26’ 25’’ E 61.96’ to the point of beginning and 
containing 5.89 acres more or less. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(4) CONSIDERATION.—The Tri-County Levee District, Mis-
souri, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less 
than the fair market value of the property conveyed under 
this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. 
(j) JUDGE JOSEPH BARKER, JR., HOUSE, OHIO.— 
(1) NON-FEDERAL
ENTITY.—In this subsection, the term 
‘‘non-Federal entity’’ means the Friends of Joseph Barker, Jr., 
House, a nonprofit organization in the State of Ohio. 
(2) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (6), the Sec-
retary shall convey to the non-Federal entity, without 
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the property described in paragraph (3)(A). 
(B) EASEMENT.—Upon conveyance of the property 
under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to 
the non-Federal entity, without consideration, an easement 
over the property described in paragraph (3)(B) for access 
to the conveyed property for as long as the non-Federal 
entity is in legal possession of the conveyed property. 
(3) DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTY.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The property referred to in para-
graph (2)(A) is the following (as in existence on the date 
of enactment of this Act):
H. R. 133—1547 
(i) JUDGE JOSEPH BARKER, JR., HOUSE.—The tract 
of land situated in the State of Ohio, Washington 
County, on the Ohio River, and being particularly 
bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point 
located on the southern right-of-way line of Ohio Route 
7, a new corner to the land now or formerly owned 
by the United States of America; thence, leaving the 
right-of-way of said Route 7 and severing the land 
of said United States of America parallel to and 
approximately 10 feet easterly of the toe of the existing 
dredge disposal berm, southeasterly approximately 326 
feet to a point prior to the current Corps of Engineers 
access to the dredging spoil area; thence, northeasterly 
approximately 480 feet paralleling the top of the slope 
to the riverbank side of the house and approximately 
25 feet northerly therefrom; thence, northwest approxi-
mately 302 feet to a point in the southern right-of- 
way of Ohio Route 7; thence with the right-of-way 
of said Route 7, southwesterly approximately 485 feet 
to the point of beginning, containing approximately 
3.51 acres. 
(ii) ROAD TRACT.—The tract of land situated in 
the State of Ohio, Washington County, on the Ohio 
River, and being particularly bounded and described 
as follows: Beginning at a point located on the southern 
right-of-way line of Ohio Route 7, a new corner to 
the land now or formerly owned by the United States 
of America; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
Route 7 and severing the land of said United States 
of America and with the House Parcel southeasterly 
25 feet; thence, northeast, running parallel to said 
Route 7 right-of-way, approximately 994 feet to a point 
of deflection; thence northeasterly 368 feet to a point 
beyond the existing fence corner; thence, east 140 feet 
to the edge of the existing Willow Island access road; 
thence with said access road, northwesterly approxi-
mately 62 feet to a point in the southern right-of- 
way of Ohio Route 7; thence with the right-of-way 
of said Route 7, southwesterly approximately 1,491 
feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 
1 acre. 
(B) EASEMENT.—The property referred to in paragraph 
(2)(B) is the following: The tract of land situated in the 
State of Ohio, Washington County, on the Ohio River, 
and being particularly bounded and described as follows: 
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the southern 
right-of-way of Ohio Route 7 and the northeast side of 
the existing Willow Island access road, a new corner to 
the land now or formerly owned by the United States 
of America; thence, southwest, running with said Route 
7 right-of-way, approximately 30 feet to a point on the 
southwest side of the existing access road, and corner to 
the road tract; thence with said access road and the line 
of the road parcel, southeasterly approximately 62 feet 
to a point; thence leaving the road parcel and crossing 
the existing access road northeasterly approximately 30 
feet to a point located on the northeast side of the existing
H. R. 133—1548 
access road; thence, northwesterly approximately 62 feet, 
to the point of beginning, containing approximately 0.04 
acre. 
(4) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(5) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that the prop-
erty conveyed under this subsection is not being used by the 
non-Federal entity for a public purpose, all right, title, and 
interest in and to the property shall revert, at the discretion 
of the Secretary, to the United States. 
(6) REQUIREMENTS.— 
(A) IMPROVEMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.— 
(i) IMPROVEMENTS.—The Secretary shall make 
such improvements and alterations to the property 
described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) as the Secretary, in 
consultation with the non-Federal entity and relevant 
stakeholders, determines to be appropriate to facilitate 
conveyance of the property and provision of the ease-
ment under this subsection. 
(ii) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.—Before making 
a conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary 
shall— 
(I) conduct, with respect to the property to 
be conveyed, an assessment of the environmental 
condition of the property, including an investiga-
tion of any potential hazardous, toxic, or radio-
active waste present on such property; and 
(II) submit to the non-Federal entity a report 
describing the results of such assessment. 
(iii) LIMITATION.—The total cost of the activities 
carried out by the Secretary under this subparagraph 
shall be not more than $120,000. 
(B) REFUSAL BY NON-FEDERAL ENTITY.— 
(i) IN GENERAL.—Upon review by the non-Federal 
entity of the report under subparagraph (A)(ii), the 
non-Federal entity may elect to refuse the conveyance 
under this subsection. 
(ii) ELECTION.—An election under clause (i)— 
(I) shall be at the sole discretion of the non- 
Federal entity; and 
(II) shall be made by the non-Federal entity 
by not later than the date that is 30 days after 
the date of submission of the report under subpara-
graph (A)(ii)(II). 
(C) DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT ACTIVITIES.—The 
Secretary shall— 
(i) notify and coordinate with the non-Federal 
entity and relevant stakeholders before carrying out 
any dredged material placement activities associated 
with the property described in paragraph (3)(A) after 
the date on which such property is conveyed under 
this subsection; and
H. R. 133—1549 
(ii) in carrying out a dredged material placement 
activity under clause (i), act in accordance with Engi-
neer Manual EM 1110–2–5025 (or a subsequent 
version of that manual). 
(7) RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.—The Secretary may reserve 
and retain from any conveyance under this subsection a right- 
of-way or any other right that the Secretary determines to 
be necessary for the operation and maintenance of the author-
ized Federal channel along the Ohio River. 
(8) TREATMENT.—Conveyance to the non-Federal entity 
under this subsection of property described in paragraph 
(3)(A)(i) shall satisfy all obligations of the Secretary with respect 
to such property under— 
(A) section 306101 of title 54, United States Code; 
and 
(B) section 306108 of title 54, United States Code, 
with respect to the effects on the property of dredged 
material placement activities carried out by the Secretary 
after the date of the conveyances. 
(9) INAPPLICABILITY.—Subtitle I of title 40, and chapter 
4 of title 41, United States Code shall not apply to any convey-
ance or easement provided under this subsection. 
(k) LEABURG FISH HATCHERY, LANE COUNTY, OREGON.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Subject to the provisions 
of this subsection, the Secretary shall convey, without consider-
ation, to the State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Depart-
ment of Fish and Wildlife, all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to the real property comprising the 
Leaburg Fish Hatchery, consisting of approximately 21.55 acres, 
identified as tracts Q–1500, Q–1501E, and 300E–1 and 
described in Department of the Army Lease No. DACW57– 
1–18–0009, together with any improvements on the property. 
(2) WATER
RIGHTS.—The Secretary may transfer to the 
State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Department of 
Fish and Wildlife, any water rights held by the United States 
that are appurtenant to the property conveyed under this sub-
section. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States, including a condition that all 
of the property conveyed under this subsection be used and 
maintained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating 
a fish hatchery in perpetuity. 
(4) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that the prop-
erty conveyed under this subsection is not being used or main-
tained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating 
a fish hatchery in perpetuity, all or any portion of the property, 
including any water rights transferred under this subsection, 
shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to the United 
States. 
(5) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—If the State of Oregon does not accept 
the conveyance under this subsection, the Secretary may dis-
pose of the property, including appurtenant water rights, under 
subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code. 
(l) WILLAMETTE FALLS LOCKS, WILLAMETTE RIVER, OREGON.— 
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
H. R. 133—1550 
(A) REAL
ESTATE
APPENDIX.—The term ‘‘real estate 
appendix’’ means Appendix A of the document published 
by the District Commander of the Portland District of 
the Corps of Engineers, titled ‘‘Willamette Falls Locks 
Willamette River Oregon Section 216 Disposition Study 
with Integrated Environmental Assessment’’. 
(B) RECEIVING
ENTITY.—The term ‘‘receiving entity’’ 
means an entity identified by the State of Oregon, in con-
sultation with the Willamette Falls Locks Commission, to 
receive the conveyance under paragraph (2). 
(C) WILLAMETTE
FALLS
LOCKS
PROJECT.—The term 
‘‘Willamette Falls Locks project’’ means the project for 
navigation, Willamette Falls Locks, Willamette River, 
Oregon, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 
664, chapter 382). 
(D) WILLAMETTE
FALLS
LOCKS
REPORT.—The term 
‘‘Willamette Falls Locks report’’ means the memorandum 
of the Director of Civil Works with the subject ‘‘Willamette 
Falls Locks (WFL), Willamette River Oregon Section 216 
Disposition Study with Integrated Environmental Assess-
ment (Study)’’, dated July 11, 2019. 
(2) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary is authorized 
to convey to the receiving entity, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any 
land in which the Federal Government has a property interest 
for the Willamette Falls Locks project, together with any 
improvements on the land, subject to the requirements of this 
subsection and in accordance with the Willamette Falls Locks 
report. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the property under 
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and condi-
tions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(4) 
SUBJECT
TO
EXISTING
EASEMENTS
AND
OTHER 
INTERESTS.—The conveyance of property under paragraph (2) 
shall be subject to all existing deed reservations, easements, 
rights-of-way, and leases that are in effect as of the date of 
the conveyance. 
(5) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that the prop-
erty conveyed under this subsection cease to be held in public 
ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to the property 
shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United 
States. 
(6) REQUIREMENTS BEFORE CONVEYANCE.— 
(A) PERPETUAL ROAD EASEMENT.—Before making the 
conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall 
acquire a perpetual road easement from an adjacent prop-
erty owner for use of an access road, which easement 
shall convey with the property conveyed under such para-
graph. 
(B) ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.—Before making the 
conveyance under paragraph (2), in accordance with the 
real estate appendix, the Secretary shall complete a Phase 
1 Environmental Site Assessment pursuant to the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.).
H. R. 133—1551 
(C) HISTORIC PRESERVATION.—The Secretary may enter 
into a memorandum of agreement with the Oregon State 
Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on 
Historic Preservation that identifies actions the Secretary 
shall take before making the conveyance under paragraph 
(2). 
(D) REPAIRS.—Before making the conveyance under 
paragraph (2), the Secretary shall carry out repairs to 
address primary seismic and safety risks in accordance 
with the recommendations approved in the Willamette 
Falls Locks report. 
(7) DEAUTHORIZATION.—Beginning on the date on which 
the Secretary makes the conveyance under paragraph (2), the 
Willamette Falls Locks project is no longer authorized. 
SEC. 357. LAKE EUFAULA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. 
Section 3133(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (121 Stat. 1141) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(5) TERMINATION.—The committee shall terminate on the 
date that is 30 days after the date on which the committee 
submits final recommendations to the Secretary.’’. 
SEC. 358. REPEAL OF MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE, NORTH DAKOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 705 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2696) is repealed. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) PURPOSES.—Section 702(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2695) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘prepared under section 705(e) (as in effect on the 
day before the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020)’’ before the period at the end. 
(2) DEFINITIONS.—Section 703 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2695) is amended— 
(A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (5) as para-
graphs (2) and (3), respectively. 
SEC. 359. REPEAL OF MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE, SOUTH DAKOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 905 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2709) is repealed. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) PURPOSES.—Section 902(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘prepared under section 905(e) (as in effect on the 
day before the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020)’’ before the period at the end. 
(2) DEFINITIONS.—Section 903 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended— 
(A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (5) as para-
graphs (2) and (3), respectively. 
SEC. 360. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 
(a) Section 710 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2264), and the item relating to such section in 
the table of contents, are repealed. 
(b) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a) is amended—
H. R. 133—1552 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) and redesig-
nating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); and 
(2) by striking subsection (c). 
(c) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Develop-
ment Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (d)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding the 
requirements of subsection (c), the Secretary’’ and inserting 
‘‘The Secretary’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘subsections (a) and (c)’’ each place 
it appears and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 
(C) by striking paragraph (4); and 
(2) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating subsections 
(d) through (g) as subsections (c) through (f), respectively. 
(d) Section 6003 of the Water Resources Reform and Develop-
ment Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 579c), and the item relating to such 
section in the table of contents, are repealed. 
(e) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2016 (33 U.S.C. 579d), and the item relating to such section in 
the table of contents, are repealed. 
(f) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2016 (33 U.S.C. 579c–1), and the item relating to such section 
in the table of contents, are repealed. 
(g) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (33 U.S.C. 579d–1), and the item relating to such section 
in the table of contents, are repealed. 
(h) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (33 U.S.C. 579c–2), and the item relating to such section 
in the table of contents, are repealed. 
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled 
‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development’’ sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources 
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise 
reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject 
to the conditions, described in the respective reports or decision 
documents designated in this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.— 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. AK 
Port of Nome 
Modifications 
May 29, 
2020 
Federal: $378,908,000 
Non-Federal: $126,325,000 
Total: $505,233,000
H. R. 133—1553 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
2. AK 
St. George Har-
bor Improve-
ment, St. 
George 
August 13, 
2020 
Federal: $147,874,000 
Non-Federal: $16,508,000 
Total: $164,382,000 
3. AK 
Unalaska (Dutch 
Harbor) Chan-
nels 
February 7, 
2020 
Federal: $26,967,000 
Non-Federal: $8,989,000 
Total: $35,956,000 
4. CT 
New Haven Har-
bor Navigation 
Improvement 
Project 
May 7, 2020 
Federal: $55,250,000 
Non-Federal: $19,442,000 
Total: $74,692,000 
5. NY, 
NJ 
New York and 
New Jersey 
Harbor An-
chorages 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $19,550,000 
Non-Federal: $6,520,000 
Total: $26,070,000 
6. TX 
Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway, 
Brazos River 
Floodgates and 
Colorado River 
Locks 
October 23, 
2019 
Total: $414,144,000 
7. TX 
Houston Ship 
Channel Ex-
pansion Chan-
nel Improve-
ment Project, 
Harris, Cham-
bers, and Gal-
veston Coun-
ties 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $625,204,000 
Non-Federal: $260,431,000 
Total: $885,635,000 
8. TX 
Matagorda Ship 
Channel Im-
provement 
Project, Port 
Lavaca 
November 
15, 2019 
Federal: $140,156,000 
Non-Federal: $80,500,000 
Total: $220,656,000 
9. VA 
Atlantic Intra-
coastal Water-
way, North 
Landing 
Bridge Re-
placement 
August 25, 
2020 
Federal: $102,755,000 
Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $102,755,000 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.—
H. R. 133—1554 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. AZ 
Little Colorado 
River at Wins-
low, Navajo 
County 
December 
14, 2018 
Federal: $54,260,000 
Non-Federal: $29,217,000 
Total: $83,477,000 
2. CA 
Westminster, 
East Garden 
Grove, Cali-
fornia Flood 
Risk Manage-
ment 
July 9, 2020 
Federal: $324,905,000 
Non-Federal: $940,191,000 
Total: $1,265,096,000 
3. CT, 
NY 
Westchester 
County 
Streams, 
Byram River 
Basin, Fair-
field County, 
Connecticut, 
and West-
chester Coun-
ty, New York 
May 7, 2020 
Federal: $15,199,000 
Non-Federal: $15,199,000 
Total: $30,397,000 
4. KY 
Louisville Metro-
politan Flood 
Protection Sys-
tem Recon-
struction, Jef-
ferson and 
Bullitt Coun-
ties 
October 27, 
2020 
Federal: $122,170,000 
Non-Federal: $65,917,000 
Total: $188,087,000 
5. ND 
Souris River 
Basin Flood 
Risk Manage-
ment 
April 16, 
2019 
Federal: $59,582,915 
Non-Federal: $32,364,085 
Total: $91,947,000 
6. NJ 
Peckman River 
Basin 
April 29, 
2020 
Federal: $98,137,000 
Non-Federal: $52,843,000 
Total: $150,980,000 
7. NM 
Middle Rio 
Grande Flood 
Protection, 
Bernalillo to 
Belen 
March 13, 
2020 
Federal: $201,944,451 
Non-Federal: $108,740,000 
Total: $310,684,000 
8. OK 
Tulsa and West- 
Tulsa Levee 
System, Tulsa 
County 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $89,311,000 
Non-Federal: $48,091,000 
Total: $137,402,000
H. R. 133—1556 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engi-
neers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
2. NJ 
New Jersey 
Beneficial 
Use of 
Dredged Ma-
terial for the 
Delaware 
River 
April 8, 
2020 
Initial Federal: 
$84,071,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$45,270,000 
Total: $129,341,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$85,495,000 
Renourishment Non- 
Federal: $85,495,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$170,990,000 
3. NJ 
Rahway River 
Basin, New 
Jersey 
Coastal 
Storm Risk 
Management 
June 9, 
2020 
Federal: $48,322,000 
Non-Federal: 
$26,020,000 
Total: $74,342,000 
4. NJ 
Raritan Bay 
and Sandy 
Hook Bay, 
Highlands 
August 25, 
2020 
Federal: $107,680,000 
Non-Federal: 
$57,981,000 
Total: $165,661,000 
5. NY 
East Rockaway 
Inlet to 
Rockaway 
Inlet and Ja-
maica Bay, 
Atlantic 
Coast of New 
York 
August 22, 
2019 
Initial Federal: 
$638,460,000 
Initial Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $638,460,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$200,924,000 
Renourishment Non- 
Federal: $200,924,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$401,847,000
H. R. 133—1557 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engi-
neers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
6. NY 
Fire Island 
Inlet to 
Montauk 
Point, New 
York Refor-
mulation 
July 9, 
2020 
Initial Federal: 
$1,576,790,000 
Initial Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $1,576,790,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$767,695,000 
Renourishment Non- 
Federal: $767,695,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$1,535,390,000 
7. NY 
Hashamomuck 
Cove Coastal 
Storm Risk 
Management 
December 
9, 2019 
Initial Federal: 
$11,920,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$6,418,000 
Total: $18,338,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$24,237,000 
Renourishment Non- 
Federal: $24,237,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$48,474,000 
8. RI 
Pawcatuck 
River Coast-
al Storm 
Risk Man-
agement 
Project 
December 
19, 2018 
Federal: $37,679,000 
Non-Federal: 
$20,289,000 
Total: $57,968,000 
9. VA 
Norfolk Coast-
al Storm 
Risk Man-
agement 
February 
5, 2019 
Federal: $942,920,000 
Non-Federal: 
$507,730,000 
Total: $1,450,650,000 
(4) FLOOD
RISK
MANAGEMENT
AND
ECOSYSTEM
RESTORA-
TION.—
H. R. 133—1558 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CO 
South Platte 
River and Trib-
utaries, Adams 
and Denver 
Counties 
July 29, 
2019 
Federal: $344,076,000 
Non-Federal: $206,197,000 
Total: $550,273,000 
(5) ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.— 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CA 
Delta Islands 
and Levees 
December 
18, 2018 
Federal: $17,251,000 
Non-Federal: $9,289,000 
Total: $26,540,000 
2. CA 
Malibu Creek 
Ecosystem Res-
toration, Los 
Angeles and 
Ventura Coun-
ties 
November 
13, 2020 
Federal: $172,249,000 
Non-Federal: $106,960,000 
Total: $279,209,000 
3. CA 
Yuba River Eco-
system Res-
toration 
June 20, 
2019 
Federal: $66,975,000 
Non-Federal: $36,064,000 
Total: $103,039,000 
4. CO, 
NM, 
TX 
Rio Grande, En-
vironmental 
Management 
Program, 
Sandia Pueblo 
to Isleta Pueb-
lo, New Mex-
ico, Ecosystem 
Restoration 
August 5, 
2019 
Federal: $16,998,000 
Non-Federal: $9,153,000 
Total: $26,151,000 
5. FL 
Comprehensive 
Everglades 
Restoration 
Plan, 
Loxahatchee 
River Water-
shed Restora-
tion Project, 
Martin and 
Palm Beach 
Counties 
April 8, 
2020 
Federal: $379,583,000 
Non-Federal: $375,737,000 
Total: $755,320,000
H. R. 133—1559 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
6. IA, 
MO 
Grand River 
Basin Eco-
system Res-
toration 
November 
18, 2020 
Federal: $78,876,000 
Non-Federal: $42,471,000 
Total: $121,347,000 
7. IL 
The Great Lakes 
and Mississippi 
River 
Interbasin 
Study - Bran-
don Road, Will 
County 
May 23, 
2019 
Federal: $557,730,550 
Non-Federal: $300,316,450 
Total: $858,047,000 
8. IL 
South Fork of the 
South Branch 
of the Chicago 
River, Bubbly 
Creek, Eco-
system Res-
toration 
July 9, 2020 
Federal: $11,657,000 
Non-Federal: $6,277,000 
Total: $17,934,000 
9. MD 
Anacostia Water-
shed Restora-
tion, Prince 
George’s Coun-
ty 
December 
19, 2018 
Federal: $25,866,750 
Non-Federal: $13,928,250 
Total: $39,795,000 
10. MO 
St. Louis 
Riverfront- 
Meramec River 
Basin Eco-
system Res-
toration 
November 
1, 2019 
Federal: $61,362,893 
Non-Federal: $33,042,107 
Total: $94,405,000 
11. NY, 
NJ 
Hudson-Raritan 
Estuary Eco-
system Res-
toration 
May 26, 
2020 
Federal: $273,933,000 
Non-Federal: $147,502,000 
Total: $421,435,000 
12. NY 
Hudson River 
Habitat Res-
toration 
November 
19, 2020 
Federal: $33,479,000 
Non-Federal: $11,159,000 
Total: $44,638,000 
13. TX 
Jefferson County 
Ecosystem Res-
toration 
September 
12, 2019 
Federal: $38,942,000 
Non-Federal: $20,969,000 
Total: $59,911,000 
(6) WATER SUPPLY.—
H. R. 133—1560 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of En-
gineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. OR 
Willamette River 
Basin Review 
Reallocation, 
December 
18, 2019 
Federal: $0 
Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $0 
(7) MODIFICATIONS AND OTHER PROJECTS.— 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CA 
San Luis Rey 
Flood Control 
Project, San 
Diego County 
July 24, 
2020 
Federal: $143,407,500 
Non-Federal: $47,802,500 
Total: $191,210,000 
2. FL 
Caloosahatchee 
River West 
Basin Storage 
Reservoir (C-43 
WBSR) 
July 24, 
2020 
Federal: $514,999,000 
Non-Federal: $514,999,000 
Total: $1,029,998,000 
3. FL 
Central and 
Southern Flor-
ida, Canal 111 
(C-111) South 
Dade Project 
September 
15, 2020 
Federal: $66,736,500 
Non-Federal: $66,736,500 
Total: $133,473,000 
4. KY 
Kentucky Lock 
June 9, 
2020 
Total: $1,166,809,000 
5. NC 
Carolina Beach 
Integrated 
Beach Re-
nourishment 
June 16, 
2020 
Federal: $25,125,000 
Non-Federal: $25,125,000 
Total: $50,250,000 
6. NC 
Wrightsville 
Beach 
July 2, 2020 
Federal: $60,068,000 
Non-Federal: $18,486,000 
Total: $78,554,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$18,918,900 
Renourishment Non-Fed-
eral: $10,187,100 
Renourishment Total: 
$29,106,000 
7. TX 
Corpus Christi 
Ship Channel, 
Deepening and 
Widening and 
Barge Shelves 
May 4, 2020 
Federal: $406,343,000 
Non-Federal: $275,274,000 
Total: $681,617,000
H. R. 133—1561 
A. State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
8. VA 
Atlantic Intra-
coastal Water-
way Deep 
Creek Bridge 
Replacement 
October 19, 
2020 
Federal: $59,500,000 
Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $59,500,000 
SEC. 402. SPECIAL RULES. 
(a) GREAT LAKES AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER INTERBASIN PROJECT, 
BRANDON ROAD, WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry 
out the project for ecosystem restoration, Great Lakes and Mis-
sissippi River Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, 
Illinois, authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially in 
accordance with the terms and conditions described in the Report 
of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 23, 2019, with the following 
modifications: 
(1) The Federal share of the cost of construction shall 
be 80 percent. 
(2) The Secretary may include the addition or substitution 
of technologies or measures not described in the report, as 
the Secretary determines to be advisable. 
(b) EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA 
BAY REFORMULATION, NEW YORK.—The project for hurricane and 
storm damage reduction, East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 
and Jamaica Bay, Atlantic Coast of New York, authorized by section 
401 of this Act, shall be considered to be a continuation of the 
interim response to the authorization by the House of Representa-
tives dated September 20, 1997, and the authorization under the 
heading ‘‘Department of the Army—Corps of Engineers—Civil— 
Construction’’ under chapter 4 of title X of the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (127 Stat. 24). 
(c) TULSA AND WEST-TULSA LEVEE SYSTEM, TULSA COUNTY, 
OKLAHOMA.—For the project for flood risk management, Tulsa and 
West-Tulsa Levee System, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, authorized 
by section 401 of this Act, the non-Federal contribution for the 
project shall be financed over a period of 30 years from the date 
of completion of the project, in accordance with section 103(k) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2213(k)). 
(d) WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN REVIEW REALLOCATION STUDY.— 
The Secretary shall carry out the project for water supply, Willam-
ette River Basin Review Reallocation, Oregon, authorized by section 
401 of this Act, substantially in accordance with the terms and 
conditions described in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
December 18, 2019, with the following modifications: 
(1) The Secretary shall meet the obligations of the Corps 
of Engineers under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 by 
complying with the June 2019 NMFS Willamette Basin Review 
Study Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative 
until such time, if any, as it is modified or replaced, in whole 
or in part, through the consultation process under section 7(a) 
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
H. R. 133—1562 
(2) The Secretary may reallocate not more than 10 percent 
of overall storage in the joint conservation pool, as authorized 
by this Act and without further congressional action, if such 
reallocation is consistent with the ongoing consultation under 
section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 related 
to Willamette Valley System operations. 
(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the revised reallocation 
is not reallocated from a single storage use, does not seriously 
affect authorized project purposes, and does not otherwise 
involve major operational changes to the project. 
(e) CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.—Section 
5127 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 
1242) is amended by striking ‘‘ $150,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ 
$255,816,000’’. 
SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS BASED ON FEASIBILITY 
STUDIES PREPARED BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
the following projects for water resources development and con-
servation and other purposes, subject to subsection (b): 
(1) FORT PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.—The project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Fort Pierce, St. 
Lucie County, Florida, as described in the review assessment 
of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of St. Lucie County, 
Florida Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project Section 203 
Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment 
(June 2018)’’ and dated July 2018, at a total cost of $33,107,639, 
and at an estimated total cost of $97,958,972 for periodic 
nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. 
(2) BAPTISTE COLLETTE BAYOU, LOUISIANA.—The project for 
navigation, Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana, as described 
in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review 
Assessment of Plaquemines Parish Government’s Section 203 
Study Baptiste Collette Bayou Navigation Channel Deepening 
Project Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assess-
ment (January 2017, Amended April 2018)’’ and dated June 
2018, at a total cost of $44,920,000. 
(3) HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LOUISIANA.—The project for 
navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana, as described 
in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review 
Assessment of Houma Navigation Canal Deepening Project Sec-
tion 203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environ-
mental Impact Statement (June 2018)’’ and dated July 2018, 
at a total cost of $253,458,000. 
(4) PORT
FOURCHON
BELLE
PASS
CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.— 
The project for navigation, Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel, 
Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of the Sec-
retary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of Port Fourchon Belle Pass 
Channel Deepening Project Section 203 Feasibility Study 
(January 2019, revised January 2020)’’ and dated April 2020, 
at a total cost of $95,483,000. 
(5) WILMINGTON HARBOR, NORTH CAROLINA.—The project 
for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina, as 
described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled 
‘‘Review Assessment of Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina 
Navigation Improvement Project Integrated Section 203 Study
H. R. 133—1563 
& Environmental Report (February 2020)’’ and dated May 2020, 
at a total cost of $834,093,000. 
(6) CHACON
CREEK, TEXAS.—The project for flood risk 
management, ecosystem restoration, and other purposes, 
Chacon Creek, Texas, as described in the review assessment 
of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of Chacon Creek, 
Texas Section 203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT 
Environmental Assessment (August 2018)’’ and dated Sep-
tember 2018, at a total cost of $51,973,000. 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may only carry out a project 
authorized under subsection (a)— 
(1) substantially in accordance with the applicable review 
assessment for the project submitted by the Secretary under 
section 203(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
as identified in subsection (a) of this section, and subject to 
such modifications or conditions as the Secretary considers 
appropriate and identifies in a final assessment that addresses 
the concerns, recommendations, and conditions identified by 
the Secretary in the applicable review assessment; and 
(2) after the Secretary transmits to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
of the Senate such final assessment. 
TITLE V—OTHER MATTERS 
SEC. 501. UPDATE ON INVASIVE SPECIES POLICY GUIDANCE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall periodically update the 
Invasive Species Policy Guidance, developed under section 104 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) and the Nonindige-
nous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 
U.S.C. 4701 et seq.), in accordance with the most recent National 
Invasive Species Council Management Plan developed pursuant 
to Executive Order 13112. 
(b) INCLUSION.—The Secretary may include in the updated 
guidance invasive species specific efforts at federally authorized 
water resources development projects located in— 
(1) high-altitude lakes; and 
(2) the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins. 
SEC. 502. AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES RESEARCH. 
Section 1108 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 
(33 U.S.C. 2263a) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘management’’ and inserting ‘‘preven-
tion, management,’’; and 
(B) by inserting ‘‘, elodea, quagga mussels,’’ after 
‘‘Asian carp’’; and 
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘or could be impacted in the future’’ 
after ‘‘impacted’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Pacific’’ and all that follows through 
the period at the end and inserting ‘‘Pacific, Arctic, and 
Gulf Coasts, the Great Lakes, and reservoirs operated and 
maintained by the Secretary.’’.
H. R. 133—1564 
SEC. 503. TERRESTRIAL NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out a pilot program, 
in consultation with the Federal Interagency Committee for the 
Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds, to identify and develop 
new and improved strategies for terrestrial noxious weed control 
on Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. 
(b) PARTNERSHIPS.—In carrying out the pilot program under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall act in partnership with such 
other individuals and entities as the Secretary determines to be 
appropriate. 
(c) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary may utilize 
cooperative agreements with county and State agencies for the 
implementation of the pilot program under subsection (a). 
(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives a report describing the new and improved strate-
gies developed through the pilot program under subsection (a). 
SEC. 504. INVASIVE SPECIES RISK ASSESSMENT, PRIORITIZATION, AND 
MANAGEMENT. 
Section 528(f)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3771) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (I) and (J) as subpara-
graphs (J) and (K), respectively; 
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (H) the following: 
‘‘(I) shall, using existing amounts appropriated to the 
Task Force, develop and update, as appropriate, a priority 
list of invasive species that— 
‘‘(i) reflects an assessment of ecological risk that 
the listed invasive species represent; 
‘‘(ii) includes populations of invasive plants and 
animals that— 
‘‘(I) are significantly impacting the structure 
and function of ecological communities, native spe-
cies, or habitat within the South Florida eco-
system; or 
‘‘(II) demonstrate a strong potential to reduce, 
obscure, or otherwise alter key indicators used to 
measure Everglades restoration progress; and 
‘‘(iii) shall be used by the Task Force and agencies 
and entities represented on the Task Force to focus 
cooperative and collaborative efforts— 
‘‘(I) to guide applied research; 
‘‘(II) to develop innovative strategies and tools 
to facilitate improved management, control, or 
eradication of listed invasive species; 
‘‘(III) to implement specific management, con-
trol, or eradication activities at the appropriate 
periodicity and intensity necessary to reduce or 
neutralize the impacts of listed invasive species, 
including the use of qualified skilled volunteers 
when appropriate; and 
‘‘(IV) to develop innovative strategies and tools 
to prevent future introductions of nonnative spe-
cies;’’;
H. R. 133—1565 
(3) in subparagraph (J) (as so redesignated), by striking 
‘‘ecosystem’’ and inserting ‘‘ecosystem, including the activities 
described in subparagraph (I)’’; and 
(4) in clause (i) of subparagraph (K) (as so redesignated), 
by inserting ‘‘, including the priority list under subparagraph 
(I) and the activities described in that subparagraph’’ after 
‘‘Task Force’’. 
SEC. 505. INVASIVE SPECIES MITIGATION AND REDUCTION. 
Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
striking ‘‘this section $110,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘this 
section 
(except 
for 
subsections 
(f) 
and 
(g)) 
$130,000,000’’; 
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 
end; 
(iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 
at the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(iv) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(D) $30,000,000 shall be made available to carry out 
subsection (d)(1)(A)(iv); and 
‘‘(E) $10,000,000 shall be made available to carry out 
subsection (d)(1)(A)(v).’’; 
(B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: 
‘‘(2) OTHER PROGRAMS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro-
priated— 
‘‘(i) $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 
through 2024 to carry out subsection (f); and 
‘‘(ii) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 
through 2024 to carry out subsection (g)(2). 
‘‘(B) INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES PILOT PROGRAM.—There 
is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the 
Interior, acting through the Director of the United States 
Fish and Wildlife Service, $10,000,000 to carry out sub-
section (g)(3).’’; and 
(D) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), by inserting 
‘‘or (2)(A)’’ after ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; 
(2) in subsection (d)— 
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘AND 
DECONTAMINATION’’ after ‘‘INSPECTION’’; 
(B) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) in subparagraph (A)— 
(I) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting 
‘‘AND DECONTAMINATION’’ after ‘‘INSPECTION’’; 
(II) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 
end; 
(III) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘Arizona River 
Basins.’’ and inserting ‘‘Arkansas River Basins;’’; 
and 
(IV) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(iv) to protect the Russian River Basin, California; 
and
H. R. 133—1566 
‘‘(v) to protect basins and watersheds that adjoin 
an international border between the United States and 
Canada.’’; and 
(ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(B) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall place watercraft 
inspection and decontamination stations under subpara-
graph (A) at locations with the highest likelihood of pre-
venting the spread of aquatic invasive species into and 
out of waters of the United States, as determined by the 
Secretary in consultation with the Governors and entities 
described in paragraph (3).’’; 
(C) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘(iii)’’ and inserting 
‘‘(v)’’; and 
(D) by striking ‘‘watercraft inspection stations’’ each 
place it appears and inserting ‘‘watercraft inspection and 
decontamination stations’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(f) INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PILOT PROGRAM.— 
‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF INVASIVE SPECIES.—In this subsection, 
the term ‘invasive species’ has the meaning given the term 
in section 1 of Executive Order 13112 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183; 
relating to invasive species (February 3, 1999)) (as amended 
by section 2 of Executive Order 13751 (81 Fed. Reg. 88609; 
relating to safeguarding the Nation from the impacts of invasive 
species (December 5, 2016))). 
‘‘(2) DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS.—The Secretary, in coordina-
tion with the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, shall carry 
out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall collaborate 
with States in the Upper Missouri River Basin in developing 
voluntary aquatic invasive species management plans to miti-
gate the effects of invasive species on public infrastructure 
facilities located on reservoirs of the Corps of Engineers in 
those States. 
‘‘(3) MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with 
the Governor of each State in the Upper Missouri River 
Basin that elects to participate in the pilot program, shall 
prepare a management plan, or update or expand an 
existing plan, for each participating State that identifies 
public infrastructure facilities located on reservoirs of the 
Corps of Engineers in those States that— 
‘‘(i) are affected by aquatic invasive species; and 
‘‘(ii) need financial and technical assistance in 
order to maintain operations. 
‘‘(B) USE OF EXISTING PLANS.—In developing a manage-
ment plan under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall 
consider a management plan submitted by a participating 
State under section 1204(a) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic 
Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
4724(a)). 
‘‘(4) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority provided 
under this subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2024. 
‘‘(g) INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND ERADI-
CATION.— 
‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF INVASIVE SPECIES.—In this subsection, 
the term ‘invasive species’ has the meaning given the term
H. R. 133—1567 
in section 1 of Executive Order 13112 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183; 
relating to invasive species (February 3, 1999)) (as amended 
by section 2 of Executive Order 13751 (81 Fed. Reg. 88609; 
relating to safeguarding the Nation from the impacts of invasive 
species (December 5, 2016))). 
‘‘(2) INVASIVE SPECIES PARTNERSHIPS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into part-
nerships with applicable States and other Federal agencies 
to carry out actions to prevent the introduction of, control, 
or eradicate, to the maximum extent practicable, invasive 
species that adversely impact water quantity or water 
quality in the Platte River Basin, the Upper Colorado River 
Basin, the Upper Snake River Basin, and the Upper Mis-
souri River Basin. 
‘‘(B) PRIORITIZATION.—In selecting actions to carry out 
under a partnership under subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
shall give priority to projects that are intended to control 
or eradicate the Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) or 
saltcedar (of the genus Tamarix). 
‘‘(3) INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES PILOT PROGRAM.— 
‘‘(A) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph: 
‘‘(i) ELIGIBLE
ENTITY.—The term ‘eligible entity’ 
means a partnership between or among 2 or more 
entities that— 
‘‘(I) includes— 
‘‘(aa) at least 1 flood control district; and 
‘‘(bb) at least 1 city, county, township, 
town, borough, parish, village, or other general 
purpose political subdivision of a State or 
Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the 
Indian 
Self-Determination 
and 
Education 
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)); and 
‘‘(II) may include any other entity (such as 
a nonprofit organization or institution of higher 
education), as determined by the Secretary. 
‘‘(ii) INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES.—The term ‘invasive 
plant species’ means a plant that is nonnative to the 
ecosystem under consideration, the introduction of 
which causes or is likely to cause economic harm or 
harm to human health. 
‘‘(B) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of the Interior, 
acting through the Director of the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, shall establish a pilot program under 
which such Secretary shall work with eligible entities to 
carry out activities— 
‘‘(i) to remove invasive plant species in riparian 
areas that contribute to drought conditions in— 
‘‘(I) the Lower Colorado River Basin; 
‘‘(II) the Rio Grande River Basin; 
‘‘(III) the Texas Gulf Coast Basin; and 
‘‘(IV) the Arkansas-White-Red Basin; 
‘‘(ii) where appropriate, to replace the invasive 
plant species described in clause (i) with ecologically 
suitable native species; and 
‘‘(iii) to maintain and monitor riparian areas in 
which activities are carried out under clauses (i) and 
(ii).
H. R. 133—1568 
‘‘(C) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 18 months 
after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary 
of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United 
States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives a report describing the 
implementation of the pilot program. 
‘‘(D) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority pro-
vided under this paragraph shall terminate on September 
30, 2024. 
‘‘(4) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of an action carried 
out under a partnership under paragraph (2) or an activity 
carried out under the pilot program under paragraph (3) shall 
not exceed 80 percent of the total cost of the action or activity.’’. 
SEC. 506. AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION. 
Section 1039(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Develop-
ment Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 4701 note) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘UPPER MIS-
SISSIPPI
AND
OHIO
RIVER
BASINS
AND
TRIBUTARIES’’ and 
inserting ‘‘MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING 
SUB-BASINS’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Upper Mississippi 
and Ohio River basins and tributaries’’ and inserting ‘‘Mis-
sissippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub-basins 
of the River,’’; and 
(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and the document 
prepared’’ and all that follows through ‘‘February 2012.’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the Mississippi River Basin Asian Carp 
Control Strategy Framework, and the Asian Carp Regional 
Coordinating Committee’s Asian Carp Action Plan.’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘December 31 of each year’’ and 
inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020, and biennially there-
after’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Upper Mississippi and Ohio River 
basins and tributaries’’ and inserting ‘‘Mississippi River 
and tributaries, including the 6 sub-basins of the 
River’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Upper Mississippi 
and Ohio River basins and tributaries’’ and inserting 
‘‘Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub- 
basins of the River,’’; and 
(ii) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘Upper Mississippi 
and Ohio River basins and tributaries’’ and inserting 
‘‘Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub- 
basins of the River’’. 
SEC. 507. INVASIVE SPECIES IN ALPINE LAKES PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
shall establish a pilot program (referred to in this section as the 
‘‘pilot program’’) to develop and carry out effective measures nec-
essary to prevent, control, or eradicate aquatic invasive species
H. R. 133—1569 
in alpine lakes that are not located within a unit of the National 
Park System. 
(b) PARTNERSHIPS.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
shall offer to enter into a partnership to carry out the pilot program 
with— 
(1) any relevant partnering Federal agency; and 
(2) any relevant compact agency organized with the consent 
of Congress under article I, section 10 of the Constitution 
of the United States. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program $25,000,000 for 
the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2024. 
SEC. 508. MURDER HORNET ERADICATION PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
through the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, and in con-
sultation with all relevant Federal agencies, shall establish a pilot 
program to provide financial assistance to States for management, 
research, and public education activities necessary to— 
(1) eradicate the Asian giant hornet; and 
(2) restore bee populations damaged by the Asian giant 
hornet. 
(b) ELIGIBILITY.—A State is eligible to receive financial assist-
ance under this section if the State has demonstrated to the Sec-
retary of the Interior sufficient need to implement measures to 
eradicate the Asian giant hornet. 
(c) COST SHARING.— 
(1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs of 
activities carried out under the pilot program may not exceed 
75 percent of the total costs of such activities. 
(2) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—The non-Federal share of the 
costs of activities carried out under the pilot program may 
be provided in the form of in-kind contributions of materials 
or services. 
(d) LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Not more than 
5 percent of financial assistance provided by the Secretary of the 
Interior under this section may be used for administrative expenses. 
(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out 
the pilot program $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 
2025. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) ASIAN GIANT HORNET.—The term ‘‘Asian giant hornet’’ 
means a Vespa mandarinia. 
(2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 
States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and insular 
possessions of the United States. 
(g) SUNSET.—The authority under this section shall terminate 
on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act. 
SEC. 509. ASIAN CARP PREVENTION AND CONTROL PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASIAN CARP PREVENTION PILOT PRO-
GRAM.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
Tennessee Valley Authority and other relevant Federal agen-
cies, shall carry out an Asian carp prevention pilot program
H. R. 133—1570 
to carry out projects to manage and prevent the spread of 
Asian carp using innovative technologies, methods, and meas-
ures. 
(2) PROJECT SELECTION.— 
(A) LOCATION.—Each project under the pilot program 
shall be carried out in a river system or reservoir in the 
Cumberland River Watershed or Tennessee River Water-
shed in which Asian carp populations are expanding or 
have been documented. 
(B) CONSULTATION.—In selecting projects to carry out 
under the pilot program, the Secretary shall consult with— 
(i) applicable Federal, State, and local agencies; 
(ii) institutions of higher education; and 
(iii) relevant private organizations, including non-
profit organizations. 
(C) LIMITATIONS.— 
(i) NUMBER
OF
PROJECTS.—The Secretary may 
select not more than 10 projects to carry out under 
the pilot program. 
(ii) DEADLINE.—Not later than September 30, 
2024, the Secretary shall complete projects selected 
to be carried out under the pilot program. 
(3) BEST PRACTICES.—In carrying out the pilot program, 
to the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall consider 
existing best practices, such as those described in the document 
of the Asian Carp Working Group of the Aquatic Nuisance 
Species Task Force entitled ‘‘Management and Control Plan 
for Bighead, Black, Grass, and Silver Carps in the United 
States’’ and dated November 2007. 
(4) COST-SHARE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the costs of 
a project carried out under the program may not exceed 
75 percent of the total costs of the project. 
(B) OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REHABILITATION, AND 
REPAIR.—After the completion of a project under the pilot 
program, the Federal share of the costs for operation, 
maintenance, rehabilitation, and repair of the project shall 
be 100 percent. 
(5) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT.—For projects carried out 
in reservoirs owned or managed by the Tennessee Valley 
Authority, the Secretary and the Tennessee Valley Authority 
shall execute a memorandum of agreement establishing the 
framework for a partnership and the terms and conditions 
for sharing expertise and resources. 
(6) PAYMENTS.—The Secretary is authorized to accept and 
expend funds from the Tennessee Valley Authority to complete 
any work under this section at a reservoir owned or managed 
by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 
(7) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, and 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report describing the results of the pilot 
program, including an analysis of the effectiveness of the 
innovative technologies, methods, and measures used in 
projects carried out under the pilot program at preventing 
the spread, or managing the eradicating of, Asian carp.