HR 5025 RH 
Los Angeles, United States Courthouse, 
$314,385,000
San Diego, United States Courthouse, 
$3,068,000 
District of Columbia: 
Southeast Federal Center Site Remedi-
ation, $2,650,000
Maine: 
Calais, Border Station, $3,269,000
Madawaska, Border Station, $1,760,000
Maryland: 
Montgomery County, Food and Drug Ad-
ministration Consolidation, $88,710,000
Minnesota: 
Warroad, Border Station, $1,837,000
New York: 
Alexandria 
Bay, 
Border 
Station, 
$8,884,000
Massena, Border Station, $15,000,000
North Dakota: 
Dunseith, Border Station, $2,301,000
Portal, Border Station, $22,351,000
Texas: 
El Paso, Paso Del Norte Border Station, 
$26,191,000
HR 5025 RH 
El 
Paso, 
United 
States 
Courthouse, 
$2,714,000
El 
Paso, 
Ysleta 
Border 
Station, 
$2,491,000
Vermont: 
Derby Line, Border Station, $3,348,000
Norton, Border Station, $1,747,000
Richford, Border Station, $1,545,000
Nonprospectus Construction, $10,000,000
Judgment Fund repayment, $10,000,000:
Provided, That each of the foregoing limits of costs on 
new construction projects may be exceeded to the extent 
that savings are effected in other such projects, but not 
to exceed 10 percent of the amounts included in an ap-
proved prospectus, if required, unless advance approval is 
obtained from the Committees on Appropriations of a 
greater amount: Provided further, That all funds for direct 
construction projects shall expire on September 30, 2006, 
and remain in the Federal Buildings Fund except for 
funds for projects as to which funds for design or other 
funds have been obligated in whole or in part prior to such 
date; (2) $931,211,000 shall remain available until ex-
pended for repairs and alterations, which includes associ-
ated design and construction services: Provided further,
HR 5025 RH 
That the Administrator shall fund the following projects 
from repair and alterations as the limitation will allow:
Repairs and Alterations: 
District of Columbia: 
Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 
$5,000,000
Federal Office Building 6, $8,267,000
Hoover FBI Building, $10,242,000
Mary E. Switzer Building, $80,335,000
New Executive Office Building, $6,262,000
Steam Distribution System, $2,000,000
Theodore Roosevelt Building, $9,730,000
Georgia: 
Atlanta, Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal 
Building, $14,800,000
Atlanta, United States Court of Appeals, 
$32,004,000
Hawaii: 
Hilo, Federal Building, $5,133,000
Louisiana: 
New Orleans, Boggs Federal Building, 
$22,581,000
New Orleans, Wisdom Courthouse of Ap-
peals, $8,005,000
Maryland:
HR 5025 RH 
Baltimore, George H. Fallon Federal 
Building, $46,163,000
Suitland, 
National 
Record 
Center, 
$7,989,000
Woodlawn, Social Security Administration 
Altmeyer Building, $6,300,000
Minnesota: 
St. Paul, Warren E. Burger Federal Build-
ing—Courthouse, $36,644,000
Missouri: 
Kansas City, Richard Bolling Federal 
Building, $40,048,000
New York: 
New York, Foley Square Courthouse, 
$2,505,000
Queens, Joseph P. Addabbo Federal Build-
ing, $5,455,000
Ohio: 
Cincinnati, Potter Stewart Courthouse, 
$37,975,000
Cleveland, Celebreeze Federal Building, 
$37,375,000
Washington: 
Seattle, William Nakamura Courthouse, 
$50,210,000
HR 5025 RH 
Special Emphasis Programs: 
Chlorofluorocarbons Program, $13,000,000
Energy Program, $30,000,000
Glass Fragment Retention, $20,000,000
Design Program, $49,699,000
Basic Repairs and Alterations, $394,500,000:
Provided further, That funds made available in this or any 
previous Act in the Federal Buildings Fund for repairs 
and alterations shall, for prospectus projects, be limited 
to the amount identified for each project, except each 
project in this or any previous Act may be increased by 
an amount not to exceed 10 percent unless advance ap-
proval is obtained from the Committees on Appropriations 
of a greater amount: Provided further, That additional 
projects for which prospectuses have been fully approved 
may be funded under this category only if advance ap-
proval is obtained from the Committees on Appropria-
tions: Provided further, That the amounts provided in this 
or any prior Act for repairs and alterations may be used 
to fund costs associated with implementing security im-
provements to buildings necessary to meet the minimum 
standards for security in accordance with current law and 
in compliance with the reprogramming guidelines of the 
appropriate Committees of the House and Senate: Pro-
vided further, That the difference between the funds ap-