374
(3) A partnership between the Missile Defense 
Agency and the Department of the Air Force in the 
development of common high-altitude and near-space 
assets for the respective missions of the Missile De-
fense Agency and the Department of the Air Force. 
Subtitle C—Chemical 
Demilitarization Program 
SEC. 921. TRANSFER TO SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF RE-
SPONSIBILITY FOR ASSEMBLED CHEMICAL 
WEAPONS ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM. 
Effective January 1, 2006, the text of section 142 
of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 
1521 note) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(a) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.—(1) The program 
manager for the Assembled Chemical Weapons Alter-
natives program shall report to the Secretary of the Army. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary of the Army shall provide for that 
program to be managed as part of the management orga-
nization within the Department of the Army specified in 
section 1412(e) of Public Law 99–145 (50 U.S.C. 
1521(e)). 
‘‘(b) CONTINUED IMPLEMENTATION OF PREVIOUSLY 
SELECTED ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES.—(1) In car-
rying out the destruction of lethal chemical munitions at
375
Pueblo Chemical Depot, Colorado, the Secretary of the 
Army shall continue to implement fully the alternative 
technology for such destruction at that depot selected by 
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics on July 16, 2002. 
‘‘(2) In carrying out the destruction of lethal chem-
ical munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, the 
Secretary of the Army shall continue to implement fully 
the alternative technology for such destruction at that 
depot selected by the Under Secretary of Defense for Ac-
quisition, Technology, and Logistics on February 3, 
2003.’’. 
SEC. 922. CLARIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 
AUTHORITY 
UNDER 
CHEMICAL 
DEMILI-
TARIZATION PROGRAM. 
(a) AGREEMENTS WITH FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED 
INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.—Section 1412(c)(4) of 
the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 
U.S.C 1521(c)(4)) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(4)’’; 
(2) in the first sentence—
(A) by inserting ‘‘and to tribal organiza-
tions of Indian tribes’’ after ‘‘to State and local 
governments’’; and
376
(B) by inserting ‘‘and organizations’’ after 
‘‘assist those governments’’
(3) by designating the text beginning ‘‘Addi-
tionally, the Secretary ’’ as subparagraph (B); 
(4) in the first sentence of subparagraph (B), 
as designated by paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, and 
with tribal organizations of Indian tribes,’’ after 
‘‘with State and local governments’’; and 
(5) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph: 
‘‘(C) In this subparagraph, the terms ‘tribal organi-
zation’ and ‘Indian tribes’ have the meanings given those 
terms in subsections (e) and (l), respectively, of section 
4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assist-
ance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b).’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
subsection (a) shall take effect as of December 5, 1991, 
and shall apply with respect to cooperative agreements en-
tered into on or after that date. 
Subtitle D—Intelligence-Related 
Matters 
SEC. 931. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STRATEGY FOR OPEN-
SOURCE INTELLIGENCE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings:
377
(1) Open-source intelligence (OSINT) is intel-
ligence that is produced from publicly available in-
formation collected, exploited, and disseminated in a 
timely manner to an appropriate audience for the 
purpose of addressing a specific intelligence require-
ment. 
(2) With the Information Revolution, the 
amount, significance, and accessibility of open-source 
information has exploded, but the Intelligence Com-
munity has not expanded its exploitation efforts and 
systems to produce open-source intelligence. 
(3) The production of open-source intelligence 
is a valuable intelligence discipline that must be inte-
grated in the intelligence cycle to ensure that United 
States policymakers are fully and completely in-
formed. 
(4) The dissemination and use of validated 
open-source intelligence inherently enables informa-
tion sharing as it is produced without the use of sen-
sitive sources and methods. Open-source intelligence 
products can be shared with the American public 
and foreign allies because of its unclassified nature. 
(5) The National Commission on Terrorist At-
tacks Upon the United States, in its Final Report 
released on July 22, 2004, identified shortfalls in