I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3332 
To provide safe, fair, and responsible procedures and standards for resolving 
claims of state secret privilege. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 23, 2013 
Mr. NADLER (for himself, Mr. PETRI, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 
HOLT, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. LOFGREN, and Mr. 
MCCLINTOCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To provide safe, fair, and responsible procedures and 
standards for resolving claims of state secret privilege. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Secrets Protec-
tion Act’’. 
SEC. 2. STATE SECRET PRIVILEGE. 
In any civil action brought in Federal or State court, 
the Government has a privilege to refuse to give informa-
tion and to prevent any person from giving information 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
only if the Government shows that public disclosure of the 
information that the Government seeks to protect would 
be reasonably likely to cause significant harm to the na-
tional defense or the diplomatic relations of the United 
States. 
SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF SECRETS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The court shall take steps to pro-
tect sensitive information that comes before the court in 
connection with proceedings under this Act. These steps 
may include reviewing evidence or pleadings and hearing 
arguments ex parte, issuing protective orders, placing ma-
terial under seal, and applying security procedures estab-
lished under the Classified Information Procedures Act for 
classified information to protect the sensitive information. 
(b) IN CAMERA PROCEEDINGS.—All hearings and 
other proceedings under this Act may be conducted in 
camera, as needed to protect information that may be sub-
ject to the privilege. 
(c) PARTICIPATION OF COUNSEL.—Participation of 
counsel in proceedings under this Act may be limited if 
the court determines that the limitation is a necessary step 
to protect information the Government asserts is protected 
by the privilege or that supports the claim of privilege. 
(d) GUARDIAN AD LITEM.—Where counsel is ex-
cluded from a proceeding, the court shall have discretion 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
to appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the absent 
litigant’s interests, drawing, in consultation with the ex-
cluded nongovernmental party, from a previously gen-
erated list of attorneys who have been granted required 
security clearances in the past and have agreed to serve 
in this capacity. The guardian ad litem shall not discuss 
the information claimed as privileged or its content with 
any nongovernmental party or nongovernmental party’s 
counsel. 
(e) PRODUCTION OF ADEQUATE SUBSTITUTE PEND-
ING RESOLUTION OF THE CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE.—If, at 
any point during its consideration of the Government’s 
claim, the court determines that disclosure of information 
to a party or counsel, or disclosure of information by a 
party that already possesses it, presents a risk of a harm 
described in subsection (a) that cannot be addressed 
through less restrictive means provided in this subsection, 
the court may require the Government to produce an ade-
quate substitute, such as a redacted version, summary of 
the information, or stipulation regarding the relevant 
facts, if the court deems such a substitute feasible. The 
substitute must be reviewed and approved by the court 
and must provide counsel with a substantially equivalent 
opportunity to assess and challenge the Government’s 
claim of privilege as would the protected information. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4. ASSERTION OF THE PRIVILEGE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Government may assert the 
privilege in connection with any claim in a civil action to 
which it is a party or may intervene in a civil action to 
which it is not a party to do so. 
(b) SUPPORTING AFFIDAVITS.—If the Government 
asserts the privilege, the Government shall provide the 
court with an affidavit signed by the head of the executive 
branch agency with responsibility for, and control over, the 
information asserted to be subject to the privilege. In the 
affidavit, the head of the agency shall explain the factual 
basis for the claim of privilege. The Government shall 
make public an unclassified version of the affidavit. 
SEC. 5. PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS. 
(a) PRELIMINARY REVIEW
BY COURT.—Once the 
Government has asserted the privilege, and before the 
court makes any determinations under section 6, the court 
shall undertake a preliminary review of the information 
the Government asserts is protected by the privilege and 
provide the Government an opportunity to seek protective 
measures under this Act. After any initial protective meas-
ures are in place, the court shall proceed to the consider-
ation of additional preliminary matters under this section. 
(b) CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER TO APPOINT SPE-
CIAL MASTER OR EXPERT WITNESS.—The court shall 
consider whether the appointment of a special master with 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
appropriate expertise or an expert witness, or both, would 
facilitate the court’s duties under this Act. 
(c) INDEX OF MATERIALS.—The court may order the 
Government to provide a manageable index of the informa-
tion that the Government asserts is subject to the privi-
lege. The index must correlate statements made in the af-
fidavit required under this Act with portions of the infor-
mation the Government asserts is subject to the privilege. 
The index shall be specific enough to afford the court an 
adequate foundation to review the basis of the assertion 
of the privilege by the Government. 
(d) PREHEARING CONFERENCES.—After the prelimi-
nary review, the court shall hold one or more conferences 
with the parties to— 
(1) determine any steps needed to protect sen-
sitive information; 
(2) define the issues presented by the Govern-
ment’s claim of privilege, including whether it is pos-
sible to allow the parties to complete nonprivileged 
discovery before determining whether the claim of 
privilege is valid; 
(3) order disclosure to the court of anything 
needed to assess the claim, including all information 
the Government asserts is protected by the privilege 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
and other material related to the Government’s 
claim; 
(4) resolve any disputes regarding participation 
of counsel or parties in proceedings relating to the 
claim, including access to the Government’s evidence 
and arguments; 
(5) set a schedule for completion of discovery 
related to the Government’s claim; and 
(6) take other steps as needed, such as ordering 
counsel or parties to obtain security clearances. 
SEC. 6. PROCEDURES AND STANDARD FOR ASSESSING THE 
PRIVILEGE CLAIM. 
(a) HEARING.—The court shall conduct a hearing to 
determine whether the privilege claim is valid. 
(b) BASIS FOR RULING.— 
(1) GENERALLY.—The court may not deter-
mine that the privilege is valid until the court has 
reviewed— 
(A) except as provided in paragraph (2), 
all of the information that the Government as-
serts is privileged; 
(B) the affidavits, evidence, memoranda 
and other filings submitted by the parties re-
lated to the privilege claim; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(C) any other evidence that the court de-
termines it needs to rule on the privilege. 
(2) SAMPLING IN CERTAIN CASES.—Where the 
volume of information the Government asserts is 
privileged precludes a timely review, or the court 
otherwise determines a review of all of that informa-
tion is not feasible, the court may substitute a suffi-
cient sampling of the information if the court deter-
mines that there is no reasonable possibility that re-
view of the additional information would change the 
court’s determination on the privilege claim and the 
information reviewed is sufficient to enable the court 
to make the independent assessment required by this 
section. 
(c) STANDARD.—In ruling on the validity of the privi-
lege, the court shall make an independent assessment of 
whether the harm identified by the Government, as re-
quired by section 2, is reasonably likely to occur should 
the privilege not be upheld. The court shall weigh testi-
mony from Government experts in the same manner as 
it does, and along with, any other expert testimony. 
(d) BURDEN OF PROOF.—The Government shall have 
the burden of proof as to the nature of the harm and as 
to the likelihood of its occurrence. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 7. EFFECT OF COURT DETERMINATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—If the court determines that the 
privilege is not validly asserted, the court shall issue ap-
propriate orders regarding the disclosure of the informa-
tion to a nongovernmental party and its admission at trial, 
subject to the other rules of evidence, with the right to 
interlocutory appeal as provided in section 8 for any such 
orders. If the court determines that the privilege is validly 
asserted, that information shall not be disclosed to a non-
governmental party or the public. 
(b) NONPRIVILEGED SUBSTITUTE.— 
(1) COURT CONSIDERATION OF SUBSTITUTE.— 
If the court finds that the privilege is validly as-
serted and it is possible to craft a nonprivileged sub-
stitute, such as those described in section 3(e), for 
the privileged information that would provide the 
parties a substantially equivalent opportunity to liti-
gate the case, the court shall order the Government 
to produce the substitute to the satisfaction of the 
court. 
(2) REFUSAL TO PROVIDE.—In a civil action 
brought against the Government, if the court orders 
the Government to provide a nonprivileged substitute 
for information and the Government fails to comply, 
in addition to any other appropriate sanctions, the 
court shall find against the Government on the fac-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
tual or legal issue to which the privileged informa-
tion is relevant. If the action is not brought against 
the Government, the court shall weigh the equities 
and make appropriate orders as provided in sub-
section (d). 
(c) OPPORTUNITY TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY.—The 
court shall not resolve any issue or claim and shall not 
grant a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judg-
ment based on the state secrets privilege and adversely 
to any party against whom the Government’s privilege 
claim has been upheld until that party has had a full op-
portunity to complete nonprivileged discovery and to liti-
gate the issue or claim to which the privileged information 
is relevant without regard to that privileged information. 
(d) APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN THE INTEREST OF 
JUSTICE.—After reviewing all available evidence, and only 
after determining that privileged information, for which 
it is impossible to create a nonprivileged substitute, is nec-
essary to decide a factual or legal issue or claim, the court 
shall weigh the equities and make appropriate orders in 
the interest of justice, such as striking the testimony of 
a witness, finding in favor of or against a party on a fac-
tual or legal issue to which the information is relevant, 
or dismissing a claim or counterclaim. This paragraph 
does not permit an award of money damages against a 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
party based in whole or in part on privileged information 
that was not disclosed to that party. 
SEC. 8. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The courts of appeal shall have 
jurisdiction of an appeal from a decision or order of a dis-
trict court determining that the state secrets privilege is 
not validly asserted, sanctioning a refusal to provide an 
adequate or nonprivileged substitute required under this 
Act, or refusing protective steps sought by the Govern-
ment under this Act pending the resolution of the claim 
of state secrets privilege. 
(b) APPEAL.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—An appeal taken under this 
section either before or during trial shall be expe-
dited by the court of appeals. 
(2) DURING TRIAL.—If an appeal is taken dur-
ing trial, the district court shall adjourn the trial 
until the appeal is resolved and the court of ap-
peals— 
(A) shall hear argument on appeal as expe-
ditiously as possible after adjournment of the 
trial by the district court; 
(B) may dispense with written briefs other 
than the supporting materials previously sub-
mitted to the trial court; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(C) shall render its decision as expedi-
tiously as possible after argument on appeal; 
and 
(D) may dispense with the issuance of a 
written opinion in rendering its decision. 
SEC. 9. REPORTING. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with applicable au-
thorities and duties, including those conferred by the Con-
stitution of the United States upon the executive and legis-
lative branches, the Attorney General shall report in writ-
ing to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 
the House of Representatives, the Select Committee on In-
telligence of the Senate, and the chairmen and ranking 
minority members of the Committees on the Judiciary of 
the House of Representatives and Senate on any case in 
which the Government invokes a state secrets privilege, 
not later than 30 calendar days after the date of such as-
sertion. Each report submitted under this subsection shall 
include all affidavits filed under this Act by the Govern-
ment. 
(b) OPERATION AND EFFECTIVENESS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall 
deliver to the committees of Congress described in 
subsection (a) a report concerning the operation and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
effectiveness of this Act and including suggested 
amendments to the Act. 
(2) DEADLINE.—The Attorney General shall 
submit this report not later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, and every year there-
after until the date that is 3 years after that date 
of enactment. After the date that is 3 years after 
that date of enactment, the Attorney General shall 
submit a report under paragraph (1) as necessary. 
SEC. 10. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 
This Act provides the only privilege that may be as-
serted in civil cases based on state secrets and the stand-
ards and procedures set forth in this Act apply to any 
assertion of the privilege. 
SEC. 11. APPLICATION. 
This Act applies to claims pending on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act. A court also may relieve 
a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, 
order, or proceeding that was based, in whole or in part, 
on the state secrets privilege if— 
(1) the motion for relief is filed with the ren-
dering court within one year of the date of enact-
ment of this Act; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(2) the underlying judgment, order, or pro-
ceeding from which the party seeks relief was en-
tered after January 1, 2002; and 
(3) the claim on which the judgement, order, or 
proceeding is based is— 
(A) against the Government; or 
(B) arises out of conduct by persons acting 
in the capacity of a Government officer, em-
ployee, or agent. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:36 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3332.IH
H3332
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS