358
HR 4301 EAS
(6) Whereas the Administration’s budget assumes
the Department of Defense will save at least $6 billion
from procurement reform;
(7) Whereas the first and second rounds of the
Base Realignment and Closure Commission have not
yet achieved the level of savings initially estimated,
and the 1995 base closure round may cost signifi-
cantly more than is assumed in the Administration’s
budget.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the Sense of Congress:
(1) that within 30 days after enactment of this
legislation, the Secretary of Defense should initiate a
review of the assumptions and conclusions of the
President’s Budget, the Bottom Up Review, and the
Future Years Defense Program; and that not more
than 180 days after the review is initiated the Sec-
retary of Defense should submit to the President and
to the Congress a report detailing the force structure
required for an effective defense of the United States
and its vital national interests;
(2) and that not more than 60 days after receipt
of the report described in subsection (b)(1), the Presi-
dent should submit to the Congress a report detailing
the steps the President will take to meet the force
structure described in subsection (b)(1);
359
HR 4301 EAS
(3) and that the fiscal year 1996 budget submit-
ted to the Congress by the President should reflect the
funding level necessary to support the force structure
described in subsection (b)(1).
SEC. 1092. GENOCIDE IN RWANDA.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) since April 6, 1994, elements of the Rwandan
government forces, and their allied militias, have or-
ganized the massacres of more than 200,000 Rwandan
civilians, of both Tutsi and Hutu ethnic origin;
(2) an estimated 2 million Rwandans have been
internally displaced, and at least 500,000 have fled to
neighboring countries;
(3) on April 26, 1994, the Senate agreed to Sen-
ate Resolution 207, deploring the massacres and urg-
ing prompt resolution of this crisis;
(4) the potential exists for retaliatory acts to be
committed by elements within the Rwandan Patriotic
Front against civilians;
(5) on June 8, 1994, the United Nations Secu-
rity Council expanded and reinforced the United Na-
tions Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) to
5,500 troops with a mandate to protect civilians;
(6) on June 22, 1994, the United Nations Secu-
rity Council voted unanimously to support the de-
360
HR 4301 EAS
ployment of military forces from France and Senegal
for a temporary operation that would contribute to
the security and protection of populations at risk in
Rwanda.
(b) POLICY.—The Congress—
(1) calls upon the President to acknowledge that
acts of genocide have been committed in Rwanda;
(2) urges the President to support the establish-
ment of an impartial commission of experts to exam-
ine and analyze the evidence submitted of breaches of
the Convention on Genocide, and other grave viola-
tions of international humanitarian law, committed
in Rwanda;
(3) commends the Department of Defense for
logistical help already provided and urges the Sec-
retary of Defense to further expedite all United States
military contributions to the humanitarian effort in
Rwanda.
(4) implores the President to take the lead in the
international community to expedite commitments of
the necessary resources for, and to organize the speedy
training and deployment of, the reinforced UNAMIR
operation, with the mandate of protecting civilian
populations at risk in Rwanda;
361
HR 4301 EAS
(5) strongly urges the President and the inter-
national community to expedite assistance needed for
humanitarian operations in Rwanda, and neighbor-
ing states, for the support of Rwandan refugees;
(6) commends France and Senegal for cooperat-
ing with the Secretary General towards the fulfill-
ment of the objectives of the United Nations in Rwan-
da; and
(7) urges France and Senegal pursuant to the
United Nations Security Council resolution of June
22, 1994, to maintain the humanitarian character of
their operation in Rwanda, with the view towards
impartiality and neutrality.
SEC. 1093. STUDIES OF HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF MILI-
TARY SERVICE OR EMPLOYMENT IN SOUTH-
WEST ASIA DURING THE PERSIAN GULF WAR.
(a) EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall
award a grant under this subsection to one or more
non-Federal entities selected for the award under sub-
section (c). The purpose of a grant is to permit the
entity receiving the award to carry out the study de-
scribed in paragraph (2).
(2) NATURE
OF
STUDY.—The purpose of the
study referred to in paragraph (1) is to determine the
362
HR 4301 EAS
nature and scope of the illnesses and symptoms suf-
fered by the individuals referred in paragraph (3) as
a result of service or employment in the Southwest
Asia theater of operations during the Persian Gulf
War.
(3) INDIVIDUALS
COVERED
BY
STUDY.—Para-
graph (2) applies to the following individuals:
(A) Individuals who served as members of
the Armed Forces in the Southwest Asia theater
of operations during the Persian Gulf War.
(B) Individuals who were civilian employ-
ees of the Department of Defense in that theater
during that period.
(C) Where appropriate, individuals who
were employees of contractors of the Department
in that theater during that period.
(D) Where appropriate, the spouses and
children of individuals described in subpara-
graph (A).
(4) STUDY DESIGN.—The study required under
this subsection shall be designed—
(A) to assess the extent, if any, of the asso-
ciation between—
(i) the illnesses and symptoms suffered
by individuals referred to in paragraph (3);
363
HR 4301 EAS
(ii) the exposure of the individuals re-
ferred to in subparagraphs (A), (B), and
(C) of that paragraph to chemical and bio-
logical agents, drugs and vaccines, endemic
biological diseases, pesticides, toxins, and
other potentially hazardous materials; and
(iii) the experiences of such individuals
with stress-producing battlefield and war-
time conditions;
(B) to identify risk factors for predicting
the illnesses or symptoms relating to such expo-
sure that will arise within 3 years of the arrival
of an individual referred to in subparagraph
(A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (3) in the South-
west Asia theater of operations;
(C) to determine—
(i) the incidence, prevalence, and na-
ture of the illnesses and symptoms suffered
by the individuals referred to in paragraph
(3), including—
(I) the incidence, prevalence, and
nature of the illnesses and symptoms of
such individuals before the commence-
ment of the period of the Persian Gulf
War and the incidence, prevalence, and
364
HR 4301 EAS
nature of the illnesses of such individ-
uals after the end of that period; and
(II) the incidence, prevalence, and
nature of the illnesses, symptoms, and
birth defects of any children conceived
by such individuals before the com-
mencement of that period and of any
children conceived by such individuals
during or after the end of that period;
and
(ii) the incidence, prevalence, and na-
ture of illnesses and symptoms of other in-
dividuals or groups of individuals, if any,
who may suffer from an illness or symptom
as a result of the service or employment of
any person or group of persons in the
Southwest Asia theater of operations during
the Persian Gulf War; and
(D) to evaluate a comparison sample or to
evaluation any other matter that the Secretary
or the entity determines appropriate to the pur-
poses of the study.
(5) REPORTS.—
(A) INTERIM
REPORTS.—Not later than
each of July 1, 1995, and July 1, 1996, the Sec-
365
HR 4301 EAS
retary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Af-
fairs of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives an interim report on the results of the
study carried out under this subsection.
(B) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than Janu-
ary 1, 1998, the Secretary shall submit to the
committees referred to in subparagraph (A) a
final report on the results of the study.
(C) FORM OF REPORTS.—The reports sub-
mitted under this paragraph shall be submitted
in unclassified form.
(b) STUDIES OF HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF ADMIN-
ISTRATION OF PYRIDOSTIGMINE BROMIDE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall
award a grant under this subsection to one or more
non-Federal entities selected for the award under sub-
section (c). The purpose of a grant is to permit the
entity receiving the award to carry out a study or
studies to determine the following:
(A) The long-term health consequences of the
administration of pyridostigmine bromide as an
antidote enhancer for chemical nerve agent tox-
icity during the Persian Gulf War.
366
HR 4301 EAS
(B) The short-term and long-term health
consequences 
of 
the 
administration 
of
pyridostigmine bromide under the chemical
nerve agent pretreatment program of the Depart-
ment of Defense and exposure to pesticides, envi-
ronmental toxins, and other hazardous sub-
stances during battlefield conditions that pre-
vailed in the Southwest Asia theater of oper-
ations during the Persian Gulf War.
(2) STUDIES.—The Secretary shall provide that
an entity awarded a grant under this subsection shall
carry out a study described in paragraph (3) or (4).
(3) RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.—A study referred to
in paragraph (2) is a retrospective study on members
of the Armed Forces who served in the Southwest Asia
theater of operations during the Persian Gulf War in
order to determine the following:
(A) The nature of the undiagnosed and
chronic illnesses suffered by such members.
(B) The degree of association between such
illnesses and—
(i) use of pyridostigmine bromide over
a short period of time (as determined by the
Secretary) during the Persian Gulf War;
367
HR 4301 EAS
(ii) use of pyridostigmine bromide over
an extended period of time (as so deter-
mined) during that war; or
(iii) use of no pyridostigmine bromide.
(C) The degree of association between—
(i) such illnesses;
(ii) 
each 
extent 
of 
use 
of
pyridostigmine bromide described in sub-
paragraph (B);
(iii) receipt of other vaccinations or
medications; and
(iv) 
exposure 
to 
pesticides,
organophosphates, or carbamates.
(4) ANIMAL MODEL STUDY.—A study referred to
in paragraph (2) is also a study using appropriate
animal research models in order to determine whether
use of pyridostigmine bromide in combination with
exposure to pesticides or other organophosphates,
carbamates, or relevant chemicals results in increased
toxicity in animals and is likely to have a similar ef-
fect on humans.
(5) REPORTS.—
(A) ANIMAL
STUDY
REPORT.—Not later
than January 1, 1996, the Secretary shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees and
368
HR 4301 EAS
the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate
and the House of Representatives a report on the
study carried out under paragraph (4).
(B) INTERIM REPORTS ON RETROSPECTIVE
STUDY.—Not later than each of July 1, 1995,
and July 1, 1996, the Secretary shall submit to
the committees referred to in subparagraph (A)
an interim report on the results of the study car-
ried out under paragraph (3).
(C) FINAL
REPORT
ON
RETROSPECTIVE
STUDY.—Not later than January 1, 1998, the
Secretary shall submit to the committees referred
to in subparagraph (A) a final report on the re-
sults of the study carried out under paragraph
(3).
(D) FORM OF REPORTS.—The reports sub-
mitted under this paragraph shall be submitted
in unclassified form.
(c) SELECTION OF STUDY ENTITIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall
select entities to which to award grants for the studies
described in subsections (a) and (b) in accordance
with this subsection.
(2) SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSALS.—An entity seek-
ing to carry out a study under a grant under sub-
369
HR 4301 EAS
section (a) or (b) shall submit to the Secretary the fol-
lowing proposals:
(A) A proposal for a pilot study in order to
determine the research design and research in-
strument to be used in the study.
(B) A proposal for the study.
(3) INDEPENDENT REVIEW.—The Secretary shall
ensure that individuals described in paragraph (4)—
(A) review each proposal submitted to the
Secretary under paragraph (2) for purposes of
determining whether or not the proposal—
(i) addresses adequately the purposes of
the study; and
(ii) meets the technical, scientific, and
peer review requirements that apply to
similar studies carried out under the direc-
tion of the Secretary of Health and Human
Services; and
(B) submit to the Secretary recommenda-
tions for the selection by the Secretary of one or
more entities to carry out the study.
(4) REVIEWING
INDIVIDUALS.—Individuals re-
ferred to in paragraph (3) are any individuals who,
as determined by the Secretary—
370
HR 4301 EAS
(A) are not employees of the Federal Gov-
ernment;
(B) have an expertise in epidemiology, toxi-
cology, neurology, biology, biostatistics, post-
traumatic stress disorder, or public health; and
(C) have no financial relationship with the
Department of Defense or with any chemical
company or pharmaceutical company whose pro-
ductions may be addressed in the study.
(5) SELECTION.—The Secretary shall—
(A) select the entities that will carry out the
studies described under subsections (a) and (b)
from among the entities recommended for such
selection under paragraph (3); and
(B) award such entities grants under the
appropriate subsection.
(d) PERFORMANCE OF STUDIES.—
(1) PILOT STUDIES.—
(A) IMPLEMENTATION.—An entity to which
the Secretary awards a grant for a study under
subsection (a) or (b) shall carry out the pilot
study for such study in accordance with the pro-
posal for the pilot study submitted to the Sec-
retary under subsection (c)(2)(A).
371
HR 4301 EAS
(B) RESPONSE TO RESULTS.—If an entity
determines as a result of a pilot study under
subparagraph (A) that revisions to the study
proposed by the entity are necessary in order to
meet the purposes of the study under this section,
the entity shall submit to the Secretary a pro-
posal for such revisions to the study.
(C) 
FINAL
APPROVAL.—The 
Secretary
shall—
(i) review any revisions to a proposal
to a study that are submitted to the Sec-
retary under subparagraph (B); and
(ii) approve the proposal for the study,
as so revised, if the Secretary determines
that the proposal meets the purposes of the
study under this section.
(2) STUDIES.—An entity to which the Secretary
awards a grant for a study under subsection (a) or
(b) shall carry out the study in accordance the pro-
posal for the study under this section.
(e) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall
carry out this section in consultation with the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, the Administrator of the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, the head of the Medical Follow-Up Agency of
372
HR 4301 EAS
the Institute of Medicine, and the heads of other appropriate
departments and agencies of the Federal Government.
(f) FUNDING.—Of the amount authorized to be appro-
priated pursuant to section 201, $10,000,000 shall be avail-
able for purposes of awarding grants for the studies de-
scribed in subsections (a) and (b). Such funds shall be avail-
able for such purpose until expended.
(g) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Persian
Gulf War’’ has the meaning given such term in section
101(33) of title 38, United States Code.
SEC. 1094. GRANTS FOR RESEARCH INTO THE HEALTH CON-
SEQUENCES OF THE PERSIAN GULF WAR.
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall
award grants to appropriate non-governmental entities for
purposes of permitting such entities to carry out research
to determine—
(A) the nature and causes of any illnesses suf-
fered by the individuals referred to in paragraph (2)
as a result of service or employment in the Southwest
Asia theater of operations during the Persian Gulf
War;
(B) the methods of transmission, if any, of such
illnesses from such individuals to other individuals;
and
(C) the appropriate treatment for such illnesses.
373
HR 4301 EAS
(2) The individuals referred to in paragraph (1)(A)
are the following individuals:
(i) Individuals who served as members of the
Armed Forces in the Southwest Asia theater of oper-
ations during the Persian Gulf War.
(ii) Civilian employees of the Department of De-
fense who were employed by the Department in that
theater of operations during that period.
(iii) Employees of contractors of the Department
who were employed in that theater of operations dur-
ing that period.
(iv) The spouses and children of the individuals
referred to in clauses (i) through (iii).
(3) In carrying out research under this section, such
entities shall give particular consideration to the following:
(A) Illnesses or other effects associated with expo-
sure to depleted uranium particles, mycotoxins, ge-
netically-altered organisms, petrochemical toxicity,
pesticide poisoning, anthrax vaccines, botulinum tox-
oids, and other chemical hazards and agents.
(B) Endemic viral, fungal, bacterial, and rickett-
sial diseases (including diseases arising from biologi-
cal warfare activities).
(C) Illnesses or other effects associated with in-
gestion of silica or sand.
374
HR 4301 EAS
(D) Assessment of risks to reproductive capacity
arising from the illnesses and diseases referred to in
subparagraphs (A) through (C).
(E) Pediatric disorders.
(F) Birth deficiencies.
(G) Post-traumatic stress disorder.
(H) Somatoform disorders.
(I) Chronic fatigue syndrome.
(J) Multiple chemical sensitivities.
(b) AWARD PROCESS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense
shall award grants under this section in consultation with
the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(2) An entity seeking a grant under this section to
carry out the research described in subsection (a)(1) shall
submit to the Secretary a proposal for the research.
(3) The Secretary shall ensure that appropriate indi-
viduals who are not employees of the Federal Government—
(A) review each proposal submitted to the Sec-
retary under paragraph (2) for purposes of determin-
ing that the proposal—
(i) addresses adequately the purposes of the
research for which the proposal is submitted; and
(ii) meets the technical, scientific, and peer
review requirements that apply to similar re-
375
HR 4301 EAS
search carried out under the direction of the Sec-
retary of Health and Human Services; and
(B) submit to the Secretary recommendations for
the selection by the Secretary of one or more entities
so determined as recipients of a grant under sub-
section (a).
(4) The Secretary shall award grants under this sec-
tion to entities selected by the Secretary for that purpose
from among the entities identified in the recommendations
under paragraph (3)(B).
(5) In awarding an entity a grant under paragraph
(4), the Secretary shall ensure that the entity—
(A) carry out the research covered by the grant
in accordance with the proposal submitted to the Sec-
retary under paragraph (2); and
(B) not expose human beings to hazardous agents
or materials as a result of the research.
(c) REPORTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to
the congressional defense committees and the Committees on
Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives a report on the results of any research carried out
under a grant awarded under this section.
(2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
Health and Human Services shall submit a report under
376
HR 4301 EAS
paragraph (1) on each of March 1, 1995, October 1, 1995,
October 1, 1996, and October 1, 1997.
(3) Each report submitted under this subsection shall
be submitted in unclassified form.
(d) FUNDING.—(1) Of the amount authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, $10,000,000 shall be available
for purposes of awarding grants under this section. Such
funds shall be available for such purpose until expended.
(2) For each fiscal year in which activities under the
study under this section will continue, the Secretary of De-
fense shall provide in the documents submitted to Congress
in connection with the budget of the President for the fiscal
year a request for such funds as the Secretary determines
necessary in order to award grants under this section dur-
ing that fiscal year.
SEC. 1095. COMPATABILITY OF HEALTH REGISTRIES.
The Secretary of Defense shall take appropriate actions
to ensure that—
(1) the data collected by and the testing protocols
of the Persian Gulf War Health Surveillance System
are compatible with the data collected by and the test-
ing protocols of the Persian Gulf War Veterans
Health Registry; and
(2) information on individuals who register with
the Department of Defense is provided to the Depart-
377
HR 4301 EAS
ment of Veterans Affairs for incorporation into the
Persian Gulf War Veterans Health Registry.
SEC. 1096. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, Unit-
ed States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 113(e)(2) is amended by striking out
‘‘section 104’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section
108’’.
(2) Section 133a(b) is amended by striking out
‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Technology’’.
(3) Section 580a(a) is amended by striking out
‘‘the date of the enactment of this section’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘November 30, 1993,’’.
(4)(A) The section 1058 added by section 554(a)
of Public Law 103–160 (107 Stat. 1663) is redesig-
nated as section 1059.
(B) The item relating to that section in the table
of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 is revised
to conform to the redesignation made by subpara-
graph (A).
(5)(A) The section 1058 added by section 1433(b)
of Public Law 103–160 (107 Stat. 1834) is redesig-
nated as section 1060.
378
HR 4301 EAS
(B) The item relating to that section in the table
of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 is revised
to conform to the redesignation made by subpara-
graph (A).
(6) Section 1141 is amended by striking out ‘‘on
or after the date of the enactment of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘after November 29, 1993,’’.
(7) Section 1151(h)(3)(B)(v) is amended by in-
serting ‘‘school’’ after ‘‘For the fifth’’.
(8)(A) The heading of section 1482a is amended
so that the first letter of the fifth word is lower case.
(B) The item relating to that section in the table
of sections at the beginning of chapter 75 is revised
to conform to the amendment made by subparagraph
(A).
(9) Section 2399 is amended—
(A) in subsections (b)(5) and (c)(1), by
striking out ‘‘section 138(a)(2)(B)’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘section 139(a)(2)(B)’’;
(B) in subsection (e)(3)(B), by striking out
‘‘solely as a representative of’’ and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘solely in testing for’’;
379
HR 4301 EAS
(C) in subsection (g), by striking out ‘‘sec-
tion 138’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section
139’’; and
(D) in subsection (h)(1), by striking out
‘‘section 138(a)(2)(A)’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘section 139(a)(2)(A)’’.
(10) Section 2502(d) is amended by striking out
‘‘Executive’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘executive’’.
(11)(A) Sections 2540 and 2541, as added by
section 822(a) of Public Law 103–160 (107 Stat.
1705), are redesignated as sections 2539a and 2539b,
respectively.
(B) The items relating to those sections in the
table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V of
chapter 
148 
are 
revised 
to 
conform 
to 
the
redesignations made by subparagraph (A).
(12) Section 2865(a)(4) is amended by adding a
period at the end.
(13) 
Sections 
3022(a)(1), 
5025(a)(1), 
and
8022(a)(1) are amended by striking out ‘‘section
137(c)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section 135(c)’’.
(14) Section 9511 is amended by striking out
‘‘In this subchapter’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘In
this chapter’’.
380
HR 4301 EAS
(b) PUBLIC LAW 103–160.—Effective as of November
30, 1993, and as if included therein as enacted, the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Pub-
lic Law 103–160) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 507(d)(3) (107 Stat. 1647) is amend-
ed by inserting ‘‘note’’ after ‘‘10 U.S.C. 1293’’.
(2) Section 551(a)(1) (107 Stat. 1661) is amend-
ed by striking out ‘‘Section’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘Chapter’’.
(3) Section 554(b) (107 Stat. 1666) is amend-
ed—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘Sec-
tion 1058 of title 10, United States Code, as
added by subsection (a),’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘The section of title 10, United States
Code, added by subsection (a)(1)’’; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking out
‘‘1058’’.
(4) Section 931(c)(1) (107 Stat. 1734) is amend-
ed by inserting closing quotation marks before the pe-
riod at the end.
(5) Section 1314(3) (107 Stat. 1786) is amended
by striking out ‘‘adding at the end’’ and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘inserting after subsection (f)’’.
381
HR 4301 EAS
(6) Section 1433(d) (107 Stat. 1835) is amended
by striking out ‘‘Section 1058 of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a),’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘The section of title 10, United
States Code, added by subsection (b)(1)’’.
(7) Section 1606(b)(4) (107 Stat. 1847) is
amended by striking out ‘‘section 1604(e)’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘section 1605(e)’’.
(8) Section 2912(b)(2) (107 Stat. 1925) is
amended by striking out ‘‘section 637(d)(1)’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘section 8(d)(1)’’.
(9) Section 2926(d) (107 Stat. 1932) is amended
by striking out ‘‘Subsection (d)(1)(2)(C)(iii)’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘Subsection (d)(2)(C)(iii)’’.
(c) OTHER LAWS.—(1) Section 921 of Public Law
102–190 (10 U.S.C. 201 note; 105 Stat. 1452) is amended
by striking out ‘‘section 136(b)(3)’’ in subsection (a) and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section 138(b)(3)’’.
(2) Section 908(c) of title 37, United States Code, is
amended by striking out ‘‘section 1058’’ and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘section 1060’’.
SEC. 1097. NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress makes the following
findings:
382
HR 4301 EAS
(1) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has
served as a bulwark of peace, security, and democracy
for the United States and the members of the alliance
since 1949.
(2) The unswerving resolve of the member states
of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to mutual
defense against the threat of communist aggression
was central to the demise of the Warsaw Pact.
(3) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is
the most successful international security organiza-
tion in history, and is well suited to help marshal our
cooperative political, diplomatic, economic, and hu-
manitarian efforts, buttressed by credible military ca-
pability aimed at deterring conflict, and thus contrib-
uting to international peace and security.
(4) The threat of instability in Eastern and
Central Europe, as well as in the Southern and East-
ern Mediterranean, continues to pose a fundamental
challenge to the interests of the member states of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(5) North Atlantic Treaty Organization assets
have been deployed in recent years for more than the
territorial defense of alliance members; and the Rome
Summit of October 1991 adopted a new strategic con-
cept for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that
383
HR 4301 EAS
entertained the possibility of operations beyond the
alliance’s self-defense area.
(6) In Oslo in July 1992, and in Brussels in De-
cember 1992, the alliance embraced the deployment of
North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces to peace-
keeping operations under the auspices of the United
Nations or the Conference on Security and Coopera-
tion in Europe.
(7) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization
should attempt to cooperate with and seek a mandate
from international organizations such as the United
Nations when considering responses to out of area cri-
ses.
(8) Not all members of the international commu-
nity share a commonality of interests that would en-
sure timely action by the United Nations Security
Council.
(9) The security interests of the member coun-
tries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization must
not be held hostage to indecision at the United Na-
tions or a veto by a permanent member of the Secu-
rity Council.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the Con-
gress that—
384
HR 4301 EAS
(1) it should be the policy of the United States
that, in accordance with article 53 of the United Na-
tions Charter, the North Atlantic Treaty Organiza-
tion retains the right of autonomy of action regarding
missions in addition to collective defense should the
United Nations Security Council or the Conference on
Security and Cooperation in Europe fail to act;
(2) while it is desirable to work with other inter-
national organizations and arrangements where fea-
sible in dealing with threats to the peace, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization is not an auxiliary to
the United Nations or any other organization; and
(3) the member states of the North Atlantic Trea-
ty Organization reserve the right to act collectively in
defense of their vital interests.
SEC. 1098. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR
MARK–6 GUIDANCE SETS FOR TRIDENT II MIS-
SILES.
(a) LIMITATION.—Until the certification in subsection
(b) has been provided to the congressional defense commit-
tees, funds appropriated for fiscal year 1995 for the Navy
may not be obligated to procure more than 14 Mark–6 guid-
ance sets for Trident II missiles.
(b) CERTIFICATION.—Before the Secretary of Defense
may obligate funds for Mark–6 guidance sets in addition
385
HR 4301 EAS
to the 14 sets authorized in subsection (a), he shall certify
to the congressional defense committees that failure to pro-
cure such additional units would pose an unacceptable risk
to the long-term readiness and reliability of the Trident II
missile program.
SEC. 1099. MILITARY PLANNING FOR THE SIZE AND STRUC-
TURE OF A FORCE REQUIRED FOR A MAJOR
REGIONAL CONTINGENCY ON THE KOREAN
PENINSULA.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows:
(1) Whereas the Administration commissioned
the Bottom-Up Review to properly size and structure
the Armed Forces of the United States for the Post-
Cold-War Era;
(2) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review itself cites
the need for the Armed Forces of the United States to
be large enough to prevail in two major regional con-
flicts, similar in nature to the 1991 war against Iraq,
‘‘nearly simultaneously’’;
(3) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review gives special
consideration to a scenario that hypothesizes that the
two ‘‘nearly simultaneous’’ conflicts would occur in
Korea and the Persian Gulf;
(4) Whereas the United States sent 7 Army divi-
sions, the equivalent of 10 Air Force tactical fighter
386
HR 4301 EAS
wings, 70 heavy bombers, 6 Navy aircraft carrier bat-
tle groups, and 5 Marine Corps brigades to the Per-
sian Gulf to fight the war against Iraq;
(5) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review asserts that
the forces needed to fight two conflicts similar to that
with Iraq can be drawn from a total military force
of between 15 and 16 Army divisions, 20 Air Force
tactical fighter wings, 184 heavy bombers, 11 active
Navy aircraft carriers (along with one reserve/train-
ing carrier), and the equivalent of 12 Marine Corp
brigades;
(6) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review recognizes
that approximately 100,000 members of the United
States Armed Forces will be stationed in Europe;
(7) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review recognizes
that sizeable numbers of United States forces could be
involved in peace enforcement and intervention oper-
ations at any one time;
(8) Whereas the Bottom-Up Review makes no
specific recommendation as to the number of forces to
be held in reserve to provide a rotation base either to
relieve troops in the event one or both hypothetical
conflicts result in lengthy deployments or to replace
combat losses;
387
HR 4301 EAS
(9) Whereas military planners calculate that the
number of United States forces needed to help defeat
an invasion of South Korea by North Korea may ex-
ceed 430,000 United States military personnel;
(10) Whereas the size of the force military plan-
ners may request to help defend South Korea could
exceed the levels that are consistent with the rec-
ommendations of Bottom-Up Review if the existing
and future force requirements for a presence in Eu-
rope, possible peace enforcement operations, and an
adequate rotation base, as well as a second regional
conflict, must be fulfilled simultaneously.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the Sense of Congress:
(1) that the force structure identified in the Bot-
tom-Up Review may not be used to limit the size or
structure of the force United States military com-
manders may request in preparation for a major re-
gional contingency on the Korean peninsula;
(2) and that the Chairmen and Ranking Mem-
bers of the House and Senate Committees on Armed
Services and Chairmen and Ranking members of the
House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on
Defense should receive regular briefings from the De-
partment of Defense of the situation on the Korean
peninsula;
388
HR 4301 EAS
(3) and that the conclusions of the Bottom-Up
Review should be continuously examined in light of
the lessons learned from preparation for a major re-
gional contingency on the Korean peninsula and from
other military operations.
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995’’.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
projects in the total amount of $396,750,000 for the instal-
lations and locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts for such installations and locations, set forth in
the following table:
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ...................
Redstone Arsenal .............................
$2,600,000
Georgia .....................
Fort Benning ...................................
$6,550,000
Fort Gordon ....................................
$44,750,000
389
HR 4301 EAS
Army: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
Hawaii ......................
Schofield Barracks ..........................
$25,000,000
Kentucky ...................
Fort Campbell .................................
$67,400,000
Fort Knox ........................................
$8,500,000
Maryland ..................
Adelphi Laboratory Center ............
$6,600,000
Fort Ritchie .....................................
$3,600,000
New Jersey ...............
Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal
$4,050,000
New York ..................
United States Military Academy,
West Point .....................................
$28,000,000
North Carolina .........
Fort Bragg .......................................
$29,000,000
Sunny Point Military Ocean Ter-
minal .............................................
$22,200,000
Oklahoma ..................
Fort Sill ...........................................
$18,000,000
South Carolina .........
Charleston Naval Weapons Station
$24,000,000
Texas .........................
Fort Hood ........................................
$29,000,000
Fort Sam Houston ..........................
$4,300,000
Virginia ....................
Fort Myer ........................................
$7,300,000
Washington ...............
Fort Lewis .......................................
$64,000,000
CONUS Classified ...
Classified Location .........................
$1,900,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects in the total amount of $31,400,000 for the installa-
tion and location outside the United States, and in the
amount, set forth in the following table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country or other
Installation or location
Amount
Kwajalein Atoll ............
Kwajalein .....................................
$6,400,000
Worldwide ....................
Host Nation Support ..................
$25,000,000
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
390
HR 4301 EAS
propriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition) in the total amount of
$117,750,000 at the installations, for the purposes, and in
the amounts for such installations set forth in the following
table:
Army: Family Housing
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Alaska ...............
Fort Richardson ...
72 units ............
$5,000,000
Colorado ...........
Fort Carson ..........
145 units ..........
$16,500,000
Georgia .............
Fort Stewart .........
128 units ..........
$10,600,000
Hawaii .............
Helemano Mili-
tary Reservation
Roadway im-
provements
for family
housing.
$3,500,000
Schofield Barracks
190 units ..........
$26,000,000
Kansas ..............
Fort Riley .............
126 units ..........
$12,600,000
Massachusetts ...
Natick Research
Center ................
35 units ............
$4,150,000
New York ..........
United States
Military Acad-
emy, West Point.
56 units ............
$8,000,000
Texas .................
Fort Bliss .............
215 units ..........
$21,400,000
Fort Sam Houston
100 units ..........
$10,000,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry
out architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $5,992,000.
391
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Army may improve existing military family
housing in an amount not to exceed $49,760,000.
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1994, for military construction, land acquisition, and mili-
tary family housing functions of the Department of the
Army in the total amount of $1,731,286,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(a),
$396,750,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(b),
$31,400,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United
States Code, $12,000,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $63,926,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
392
HR 4301 EAS
(A) For construction and acquisition of
military 
family 
housing 
and 
facilities,
$173,502,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including the functions described in section
2833 
of 
title 
10, 
United 
States 
Code),
$1,067,708,000, 
of 
which 
not 
more 
than
$243,442,000 may be obligated or expended for
the leasing of military family housing world-
wide.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2105. RELOCATION OF ARMY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS
FROM FORT HUNTER LIGGETT, CALIFORNIA,
TO FORT STEWART, GEORGIA.
Section 2102(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law
102–190; 105 Stat. 1511) is amended—
(1) by striking out paragraph (1) and inserting
in lieu thereof the following new paragraph (1):
393
HR 4301 EAS
‘‘(1) Fort Hunter Liggett, California, one hun-
dred fifty-four units, $12,300,000.’’; and
(2) by striking out paragraph (5) and inserting
in lieu thereof the following new paragraph (5):
‘‘(5) Fort Stewart, Georgia, one hundred twenty-
one units, $9,890,000.’’.
SEC. 2016. HIGHWAY SAFETY AT HAWTHORNE ARMY AMMU-
NITION PLANT, NEVADA.
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Army shall carry
out a study of traffic safety on the highway at the Haw-
thorne Army Ammunition Plant, Nevada. In carrying out
the study, the Secretary shall—
(1) evaluate traffic safety on the highway, in-
cluding traffic safety with respect to the rail and
truck crossing of the highway at the Plant;
(2) evaluate the feasibility and desirability of
constructing a vehicle bridge over the rail and truck
crossing; and
(3) determine whether any construction required
to improve traffic safety on the highway be funded as
a military construction project or as a defense access
road construction project.
(b) ARCHITECTURAL
AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN.—If the Secretary determines
as a result of the study under subsection (a) that construc-
394
HR 4301 EAS
tion of a vehicle bridge over the rail and truck crossing re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) of that subsection is feasible and
desirable, the Secretary should—
(1) obtain architectural and engineering activi-
ties and carry out construction design with respect to
the construction of the bridge; or
(2) request that the Secretary of Transportation
carry out the construction of the bridge as project for
the construction of a defense access road under section
210 of title 23, United States Code.
TITLE XXII—NAVY
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
projects in the total amount of $239,265,000 for the instal-
lations and locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts for such installations and locations, set forth in
the following table:
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Arizona .....................
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station ...........
$15,085,000
California .................
Camp 
Pendleton 
Amphibious 
Task
Force ......................................................
$10,700,000
Camp Pendleton Marine Corp Base ......
$570,000
China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center .
$6,000,000
El Centro Naval Air Facility ................
$3,000,000
Lemoore Naval Air Station ....................
$7,000,000
395
HR 4301 EAS
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
North Island Naval Air Station ............
$18,830,000
Port Hueneme Naval Construction Bat-
talion Center ..........................................
$9,650,000
San Diego Marine Corps Recruit Depot
$1,090,000
San Diego Naval Station .......................
$4,100,000
Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Air-
Ground Combat Center .........................
$2,900,000
Florida ......................
Jacksonville Fleet and Industrial Sup-
ply Center ..............................................
$2,200,000
Pensacola Naval Air Station .................
$2,100,000
Hawaii ......................
Kaneohe Bay ...........................................
$4,900,000
Illinois ......................
Great Lakes Navy Public Works Center
$13,000,000
New Jersey ...............
Lakehurst Naval Air Warfare Center ....
$2,950,000
New Mexico ...............
White Sands Naval Ordnance Missile
Test Station ...........................................
$1,390,000
North Carolina .........
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
$2,100,000
Camp Lejeune Marine Corp Base ..........
$14,850,000
Rhode Island ............
Newport Naval Education and Train-
ing Center ..............................................
$14,500,000
South Carolina .........
Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit
Depot ......................................................
$2,550,000
Texas .........................
Ingleside Naval Station ..........................
$14,110,000
Virginia ....................
Chesapeake Naval Security Group Ac-
tivity ......................................................
$1,150,000
Dam Neck Fleet Combat Training Cen-
ter ...........................................................
$1,600,000
Norfolk Marine Corps Security Force
Battalion Atlantic .................................
$6,480,000
Norfolk Naval Station .............................
$16,430,000
Quantico Marine Corps Combat Devel-
opment Command .................................
$19,900,000
Washington ...............
Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Ship-
yard ........................................................
$11,040,000
Everett Naval Station .............................
$21,690,000
Whidbey Island Naval Air Station .......
$5,200,000
Various Locations ....
Aircraft Fire Rescue and Vehicle Main-
tenance Facilities ..................................
$2,200,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects in the total amount of $50,810,000 for the installa-
tions and locations outside the United States, and in the
396
HR 4301 EAS
amounts for such installations and locations, set forth in
the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Greece .........................
Souda Bay, Crete Naval Support
Activity ..........................................
$3,050,000
Italy ...........................
Naples Naval Support Activity .....
$28,460,000
Sigonella Naval Air Station ..........
$13,750,000
Puerto Rico ................
Sabana 
Seca 
Naval 
Security
Group Activity ..............................
$1,650,000
United Kingdom .......
Saint Mawgan Joint Maritime
Communications Center ...............
$3,900,000
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition) in the total amount of
$49,012,000 at the installations, for the purposes, and in
the amounts for such installations and purposes set forth
in the following table:
Navy: Family Housing
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
California .........
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corps
Base ...................
196 units ...........
$28,552,000
San Diego Naval
Public Works
Center ................
136 units ...........
$18,262,000
Maryland ..........
Patuxent River
Naval Air Sta-
tion ....................
Housing Office ..
$863,000
Virginia ............
Norfolk Naval Pub-
lic Works Center
Warehouse/Self
Help Center.
$555,000
Washington .......
Everett Naval Sta-
tion ....................
Housing Office ..
$780,000
397
HR 4301 EAS
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may carry
out architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of military family housing units in an amount
not to exceed $24,681,000.
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may improve existing military family
housing units in the amount of $155,602,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1994, for military construction, land acquisition, and mili-
tary family housing functions of the Department of the
Navy in the total amount of $1,507,349,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(a),
$239,265,000.
399
HR 4301 EAS
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2205. AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT, NAVAL SUPPLY CENTER, PENSA-
COLA, FLORIDA.
Funds appropriated by the Military Construction Ap-
propriations Act, 1994 (Public Law 103–110; 107 Stat.
1037) that are available for construction of a cold storage
facility at Naval Supply Center, Pensacola, Florida, in ac-
cordance with authorizations provided in section 2201(a)
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat.
1514), as enacted, may be expended for the portion of the
construction of such facility that is associated with Depart-
ment of the Navy contract N62467–86–C–0421.
SEC. 2206. RELOCATION OF PASCAGOULA COAST GUARD
STATION, MISSISSIPPI.
(a) AGREEMENT ON RELOCATION.—Not later than 90
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of the Navy and the Secretary of Transportation
shall enter into an agreement that provides for the reloca-
tion of the activities and functions of Pascagoula Coast
Guard Station to Pascagoula Naval Station, Pascagoula,
Mississippi.
400
HR 4301 EAS
(b) CONDITIONS.—The agreement under subsection (a)
shall include the following provisions:
(1) That the Navy not incur any construction
costs relating to the relocation.
(2) That the design, construction, and location of
Coast Guard facilities, and the conduct of activities
by the Coast Guard, at Pascagoula Naval Station not
interfere with the performance of the mission of the
Navy.
SEC. 2207. AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION DE-
SIGN FOR MAYPORT NAVAL STATION, FLOR-
IDA.
(a) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION DE-
SIGN.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy
may carry out construction design activities in connection
with the military construction projects that the Secretary
identifies as necessary for the improvement of the facilities
located at Mayport Naval Station, Florida, so that such fa-
cilities may be used as the homeport of a nuclear powered
aircraft carrier.
(b) REQUIREMENT RELATING TO COMMENCEMENT OF
DESIGN.—The Secretary may not carry out the construc-
tion design activities authorized under subsection (a) until
the Secretary—
401
HR 4301 EAS
(1) completes a study that identifies the improve-
ments to the facilities referred to in that subsection
that are necessary so that such facilities may be used
as the homeport of a nuclear powered aircraft carrier;
and
(2) completes a programmatic environmental
impact study on the effect of such improvements on
the environment.
(c) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—This section may
not be construed or interpreted as an authorization for the
Secretary to commence or proceed with any military con-
struction project relating to the improvement of the facili-
ties of Mayport Naval Station, Florida, for the purpose re-
ferred to in subsection (a).
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects in the total amount of $412,004,000 for the instal-
lations and locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts for such installations and locations, set forth in
the following table:
402
HR 4301 EAS
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama .....................
Maxwell Air Force Base ...................
$9,600,000
Alaska ........................
Cape Lisburne Long Range Radar
Site.
$2,800,000
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$3,300,000
Elmendorf Air Force Base ...............
$5,000,000
Arizona ......................
Luke Air Force Base .........................
$4,900,000
Arkansas ....................
Little Rock Air Force Base ..............
$4,800,000
California ..................
Beale Air Force Base ........................
$1,450,000
Edwards Air Force Base ..................
$7,050,000
Travis Air Force Base ......................
$3,600,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base .............
$6,550,000
Colorado .....................
Peterson Air Force Base ...................
$1,750,000
United States Air Force Academy ..
$3,600,000
Delaware ....................
Dover Air Force Base .......................
$10,500,000
Florida .......................
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station .
$10,450,000
Georgia ......................
Moody Air Force Base ......................
$14,300,000
Robins Air Force Base .....................
$21,200,000
Idaho ..........................
Mountain Home Air Force Base .....
$15,950,000
Illinois .......................
Scott Air Force Base ........................
$2,700,000
Kansas .......................
McConnell Air Force Base ...............
$500,000
Louisiana ..................
Barksdale Air Force Base ................
$27,100,000
Maryland ...................
Andrews Air Force Base ..................
$10,800,000
Mississippi .................
Columbus Air Force Base .................
$3,400,000
Keesler Air Force Base .....................
$11,240,000
Missouri .....................
Whiteman Air Force Base ................
$24,290,000
Montana .....................
Malmstrom Air Force Base ..............
$7,200,000
Nebraska ....................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$2,260,000
Nevada .......................
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$10,500,000
New Jersey .................
McGuire Air Force Base ..................
$17,000,000
New Mexico ................
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$10,950,000
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$31,000,000
North Carolina ..........
Pope Air Force Base .........................
$2,600,000
North Dakota .............
Ellsworth Air Force Base .................
$4,500,000
Grand Forks Air Force Base ...........
$5,200,000
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$10,350,000
Ohio ............................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ....
$32,700,000
Oklahoma ...................
Altus Air Force Base ........................
$3,750,000
Tinker Air Force Base ......................
$9,643,000
Vance Air Force Base .......................
$11,680,000
South Carolina ..........
Charleston Air Force Base ...............
$11,400,000
South Dakota ............
Ellsworth Air Force Base .................
$1,450,000
Tennessee ...................
Arnold Air Force Base .....................
$1,900,000
Texas ..........................
Kelly Air Force Base ........................
$8,950,000
Lackland Air Force Base .................
$5,200,000
Sheppard Air Force Base .................
$3,300,000
Washington ................
Fairchild Air Force Base .................
$8,850,000
403
HR 4301 EAS
Air Force: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
Wyoming ....................
F.E. Warren Air Force Base ...........
$2,650,000
CONUS Classified .....
Classified Location ...........................
$2,141,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and may carry out military con-
struction projects in the total amount of $38,273,000 for
the installations and locations outside the United States,
and in the amounts for such installations and locations,
set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Germany ....................
Ramstein Air Base ...........................
$12,350,000
Spangdahlem Air Base .....................
$9,473,000
Greenland ..................
Thule Air Base ..................................
$2,450,000
Portugal .....................
Lajes Field .........................................
$2,850,000
United Kingdom .......
RAF Lakenheath ...............................
$7,100,000
Overseas Classified ....
Classified Location ...........................
$4,050,000
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the
Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units
(including land acquisition) in the total amount of
$172,310,000 at the installations, for the purposes, and in
404
HR 4301 EAS
the amounts for such installations and purposes set forth
in the following table:
Air Force: Family Housing
State or Coun-
try
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Alabama ............
Maxwell Air Force
Base ...................
25 units .............
$2,100,000
Arizona .............
Davis-Monthan
Air Force Base .
60 units .............
$5,940,000
California .........
Beale Air Force
Base ...................
76 units .............
$8,842,000
Edwards Air Force
Base ...................
34 units .............
$4,629,000
Los Angeles Air
Force Base ........
50 units .............
$8,962,000
Vandenberg Air
Force Base ........
128 units ...........
$16,460,000
District of Co-
lumbia.
Bolling Air Force
Base ...................
100 units ...........
$9,000,000
Florida ..............
Patrick Air Force
Base ...................
75 units .............
$7,145,000
Idaho .................
Mountain Home
Air Force Base .
4 unit ................
$881,000
Mountain Home
Air Force Base .
60 units .............
$5,712,000
Kansas ...............
McConnell Air
Force Base ........
70 units .............
$8,322,000
Louisiana ..........
Barksdale Air
Force Base ........
82 units .............
$8,236,000
Missouri ............
Whiteman Air
Force Base ........
Housing Office ..
$567,000
New Mexico .......
Cannon Air Force
Base ...................
1 unit ................
$230,000
Holloman Air
Force Base ........
76 units .............
$7,733,000
Kirtland Air Force
Base ...................
106 units ...........
$10,058,000
North Carolina .
Pope Air Force
Base ...................
120 units ...........
$14,874,000
Seymour Johnson
Air Force Base .
74 units .............
$6,025,000
North Dakota ....
Grand Forks Air
Force Base ........
Housing Office ..
$709,000
South Carolina .
Shaw Air Force
Base ...................
3 units ...............
$631,000
Texas .................
Dyess Air Force
Base ...................
59 units .............
$7,077,000
Utah ..................
Hill Air Force
Base ...................
138 units ...........
$11,400,000
Virginia ............
Langley Air Force
Base ...................
148 units ...........
$14,421,000
405
HR 4301 EAS
Air Force: Family Housing—Continued
State or Coun-
try
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Washington .......
Fairchild Air
Force Base ........
6 units ...............
$1,035,000
Wyoming ...........
F.E. Warren Air
Force Base ........
106 units ...........
$11,321,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $9,275,000.
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may improve existing military fam-
ily housing units in an amount not to exceed $61,770,000.
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR
FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1994, for military construction, land acquisition, and mili-
tary family housing functions of the Department of the Air
Force in the total amount of $1,594,863,000 as follows:
407
HR 4301 EAS
which not more than $112,757,000 may be obli-
gated or expended for leasing of military family
housing units worldwide.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2305. AUTHORIZATION OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS AT TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE,
FLORIDA, FOR WHICH FUNDS HAVE BEEN AP-
PROPRIATED.
The table in section 2301 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1866) is amended in the item
relating to Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, by striking
out ‘‘$2,600,000’’ in the column under the heading
‘‘Amount’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$8,200,000’’.
SEC. 2306. REVISION OF AUTHORIZED FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT, TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, FLOR-
IDA.
The table in section 2302(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (division B
408
HR 4301 EAS
of Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1869) is amended in the
item relating to Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, by strik-
ing out ‘‘Infrastructure’’ in the third column and inserting
in lieu thereof ‘‘45 units’’.
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE
AGENCIES
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2405(a)(1), the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out
military construction projects in the total amount of
$413,700,000 for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts for such installations
and locations, set forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Chemical Agents and
Munitions Destruc-
tion ..........................
Anniston Army Depot, Alabama ....
$5,000,000
Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas ..........
$102,000,000
Umatilla Army Depot, Oregon .......
$183,000,000
Tooele Army Depot, Utah ................
$4,000,000
Defense Intelligence
Agency ....................
Bolling Air Force Base, Washing-
ton, District of Columbia.
$600,000
Defense Logistics
Agency ....................
Defense Contract Management Of-
fice, El Segundo, California.
$5,100,000
Defense Construction Supply Cen-
ter, Columbus, Ohio ......................
$2,200,000
Defense 
Fuel 
Support 
Point,
Craney Island, Virginia ...............
$3,652,000
Headquarters, 
Defense 
Logistics
Agency, Fort Belvoir, Virginia ....
$4,600,000
Defense Medical Fa-
cilities Office ..........
McClellan Air Force Base, Califor-
nia.
$10,280,000
409
HR 4301 EAS
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Fort McPherson, Georgia .................
$13,400,000
Fort Dix, New Jersey .......................
$2,000,000
National Security
Agency ....................
Fort Meade, Maryland .....................
$20,258,000
Office of Secretary of
Defense ....................
Various Locations, Special Activi-
ties, Air Force.
$5,300,000
Section 6 Schools .......
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Vir-
ginia.
$1,560,000
Special Operations
Force .......................
Eglin Auxiliary Field No. 9, Flor-
ida.
$21,750,000
Fort Bragg, North Carolina ............
$16,000,000
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mex-
ico ...................................................
$9,600,000
Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado,
San Diego, California ..................
$3,400,000
SEC. 2402. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2405(a)(11)(A), the Secretary of De-
fense may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition) at the installation, for the pur-
pose, and in the amount set forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Family Housing
Location
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Belgium .............
National Security
Agency ...............
1 unit ................
$300,000
SEC. 2403. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2405(a)(11)(A), the
410
HR 4301 EAS
Secretary of Defense may improve existing military family
housing units in an amount not to exceed $50,000.
SEC. 2404. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2405(a)(8), the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation
projects under section 2865 of title 10, United States Code.
SEC. 2405. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE
AGENCIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1994, for military construction, land acquisition, and mili-
tary family housing functions of the Department of Defense
(other than the military departments) in the total amount
of $3,252,058,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(a),
$152,700,000.
(2) For military construction projects at Ports-
mouth Naval Hospital, Virginia, authorized by sec-
tion 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (division B
of 
Public 
Law 
101–189; 
103 
Stat. 
1640),
$120,000,000.
411
HR 4301 EAS
(3) For military construction projects at Elmen-
dorf Air Force Base, Alaska, hospital replacement,
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (di-
vision B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2599),
$66,000,000.
(4) For military construction projects at Fort
Bragg, North Carolina, hospital replacement, author-
ized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of
Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2599), $75,000,000.
(5) For unspecified minor construction projects
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$22,348,000.
(6) For contingency construction projects of the
Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10,
United States Code, $8,511,000.
(7) For architectural and engineering services
and for construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $51,960,000.
(8) For energy conservation projects authorized
by section 2404, $50,000,000.
(9) For base closure and realignment activities
as authorized by the Defense Authorization Amend-
ments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (title
412
HR 4301 EAS
II of Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note),
$87,600,000.
(10) For base closure and realignment activities
as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Re-
alignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public
Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note):
(A) For military installations approved for
closure or realignment in 1991, $398,700,000.
(B) For military installations approved for
closure or realignment in 1993, $2,189,858,000.
(11) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition of
military family housing and facilities, $350,000.
(B) For support of military housing (in-
cluding functions described in section 2833 of
title 10, United States Code), $29,031,000, of
which not more than $24,051,000 may be obli-
gated or expended for the leasing of military
family housing units worldwide.
(b) LIMITATION OF TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variations authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act
may not exceed—
413
HR 4301 EAS
(1) the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(a) and subsection (b);
(2) $94,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized for construction of a chemical munitions de-
militarization facility at Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkan-
sas); and
(3) $167,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized for construction of a chemical munitions de-
militarization facility at Umatilla Army Depot, Or-
egon).
SEC. 2406. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
FISCAL YEAR 1993 PROJECT.
(a) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The table in sec-
tion 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484;
106 Stat. 2599) is amended by striking out the item relat-
ing to Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Colorado.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Subsection (a) of
section 2403 of such Act (106 Stat. 2600) is amended—
(A) in the matter above paragraph (1), by strik-
ing out ‘‘$2,567,146,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$2,565,146,000’’; and
414
HR 4301 EAS
(B) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking 
out
‘‘$87,950,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$85,950,000’’.
(2) Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(4);
(B) by striking out ‘‘; and’’ at the end of para-
graph (5) and inserting lieu thereof a period; and
(C) by striking out paragraph (6).
SEC. 2407. COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSISTANCE WITH REGARD
TO NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, CHARLESTON,
SOUTH CAROLINA.
Of the amount appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2405(a)(10)(B), the
Secretary of the Navy shall transfer $3,000,000 to the South
Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transpor-
tation. Funds transferred pursuant to this section shall be
used for making improvements to North Rhett Avenue,
Charleston, South Carolina.
SEC. 2408. PLANNING AND DESIGN FOR CONSTRUCTION IN
SUPPORT 
OF 
CONSOLIDATION 
OF 
OPER-
ATIONS OF THE DEFENSE FINANCE AND AC-
COUNTING SERVICE.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 2405(a)(7), $6,000,000 shall be available for planning
415
HR 4301 EAS
and design activities relating to military construction in
support of the consolidation of operations of the Defense Fi-
nance and Accounting Service.
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC
TREATY 
ORGANIZATION 
IN-
FRASTRUCTURE
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure Pro-
gram as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States
Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount
authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section
2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously
financed by the United States.
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 1994, for contribu-
tions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title
10, United States Code, for the share of the United States
of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation Infrastructure Program as authorized by section
2501, in the amount of $219,000,000.
416
HR 4301 EAS
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED GUARD AND RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 1994, for the costs of
acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces,
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 133 of title
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition
of land for those facilities), the following amounts:
(1) For the Department of the Army—
(A) for the Army National Guard of the
United States, $180,312,000; and
(B) for the Army Reserve, $37,870,000.
(2) For the Department of the Navy, for the
Naval and Marine Corps Reserve, $17,355,000.
(3) For the Department of the Air Force—
(A) for the Air National Guard of the Unit-
ed States, $240,003,000; and
(B) for the Air Force Reserve, $43,840,000.
417
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN NATIONAL GUARD
AND RESERVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH FUNDS
HAVE BEEN APPROPRIATED.
(a) FISCAL
YEAR
1994 GUARD
AND
RESERVE
PROJECTS.—Section 2601 of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (division B of Public
Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1878) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking out
‘‘$283,483,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$287,958,000’’; and
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(2), 
by 
striking 
out
‘‘$25,013,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$33,713,000’’.
(b) FISCAL
YEAR
1993 AIR
NATIONAL
GUARD
PROJECT.—Section 2601(3)(A) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B
of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2602) is amended by
striking out ‘‘$305,759,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$306,959,000’’.
TITLE XXVII—EXPIRATION OF
AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 
2701. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY
LAW.
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
418
HR 4301 EAS
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVI for military
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure program (and
authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on
the later of—
(1) October 1, 1997; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authoriz-
ing funds for military construction for fiscal year
1998.
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastruc-
ture program (and authorizations of appropriations there-
for), for which appropriated funds have been obligated be-
fore the later of—
(1) October 1, 1997; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authoriz-
ing funds for fiscal year 1998 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure program.
419
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2702. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 1992 PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2701(b) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1535)
authorizations for the projects set forth in the tables in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2101, 2301, or 2601 of
that Act, shall remain in effect until October 1, 1995, or
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for
military construction for fiscal year 1996, whichever is
later.
(b) TABLES.—The tables referred to in subsection (a)
are as follows:
Army: Extension of 1992 Project Authorizations
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
Colorado..
Fort Carson .........
Family Housing New Con-
struction (1 Unit) ...........
$150,000
Georgia ...
Fort Benning .......
General Instruction Facil-
ity .....................................
$2,150,000
Camp Merrill .......
Family Housing New Con-
struction (40 units) ........
$4,550,000
Fort Stewart ........
Family Housing New Con-
struction (120 units) ......
$9,700,000
Oregon ....
Umatilla Depot Ac-
tivity ..................
Ammunition 
Demili-
tarization Support Facil-
ity.
$3,600,000
Umatilla Depot
Activity ..............
Ammunition 
Demili-
tarization Utilities.
$7,500,000
420
HR 4301 EAS
Air Force: Extension of 1992 Project Authorization
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
Alaska .....
Eareckson Air
Force Station
(formerly
Shemya Air
Force Station) ...
Hazardous Materials Stor-
age.
$4,000,000
Army National Guard: Extension of 1992 Project
Authorizations
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
California
Stockton ...............
Add/Alter Combined Sup-
port Maintenance Shop ..
$1,613,000
District of
Colum-
bia .........
Fort Belvoir .........
Army Aviation Support
Facility ............................
$2,765,000
Maryland
Towson .................
Direct Logistics Warehouse
$373,000
Cheltenham ..........
Armory ...............................
$3,300,000
Mis-
sissippi .
West Point ...........
Organizational 
Mainte-
nance Shop ......................
$1,270,000
Tupelo ..................
Organizational 
Mainte-
nance Shop ......................
$992,000
Senatobia .............
Organizational 
Mainte-
nance Shop ......................
$723,000
Nevada ....
Washoe County ....
Organizational 
Mainte-
nance Shop ......................
$1,050,000
North
Carolina
Camp Butler ........
Range, Modified Record
Fire ..................................
$986,000
Rhode Is-
land ......
Camp Varnum .....
Sewer and Water System .
$578,000
Camp Fogarty .....
Armory ...............................
$5,151,000
West Vir-
ginia .....
Huntington ..........
Guard/Reserve Center .......
$2,983,000
421
HR 4301 EAS
Army Reserve: Extension of 1992 Project Authorizations
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
Massachu-
setts .......
Taunton .................
Reserve Center ...................
$3,526,000
Ohio ........
Perrysburg ...........
Reserve Center Addition ...
$2,749,000
Pennsylva-
nia ........
Johnstown ..............
Army/Marine Corps Avia-
tion Facility ....................
$30,224,000
Tennessee
Jackson .................
Joint Training Facility ...
$1,537,000
West Vir-
ginia .....
Huntington ..........
Guard and Reserve Center
$6,617,000
SEC. 2703. CLARIFICATION OF EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
OF 
CERTAIN 
FISCAL 
YEAR 
1991
PROJECTS.
(a) CLARIFICATION.—The table relating to the exten-
sion of authorization of certain fiscal year 1991 projects
of the Defense Agencies in section 2702(b) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1882) is amended
by inserting before the item relating to the Defense Logistics
Agency, Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office, Fort
Meade, Maryland, the following:
California
Defense Language
Institute, Monte-
rey ......................
Audio Visual Facility .......
$2,322,000
Defense Language
Institute, Monte-
rey ......................
Print Plant ........................
$1,860,000
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by sub-
section (a) shall take effect as if included in the provisions
422
HR 4301 EAS
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1822) to which
such amendment relates.
SEC. 2704. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 1991
PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2701(b) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1782),
authorizations for the projects set forth in the table in sub-
section (b) as provided in section 2401(a) of that Act and
extended by section 2702(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1535) and section 2702 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1994 (division B of Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1880),
as amended by section 2703 of this Act, shall remain in
effect until October 1, 1995, or the date of the enactment
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for
fiscal year 1995, whichever is later.
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is
as follows:
Defense Agencies: Extension of 1991 Project Authorizations
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
California
Defense Language
Institute, Monte-
rey.
Audio Visual Instructional
Media Facility ................
$2,322,000
423
HR 4301 EAS
Defense Agencies: Extension of 1991 Project Authorizations—
Continued
State
Installation or
location
Project
Amount
Defense Language
Institute, Monte-
rey.
Print Plant ........................
$1,860,000
Maryland
Defense Logistics
Agency, Defense
Reutilization
and Marketing
Office, Fort
Meade .................
Covered Storage .................
$9,500,000
SEC. 2705. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, and XXVI shall
take effect on the later of—
(1) October 1, 1994; or
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act.
TITLE XXVIII—GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Subtitle A—Military Construction
Program and Military Family
Housing Changes
SEC. 2801. CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR NOTIFI-
CATION OF CONGRESS OF IMPROVEMENTS IN
FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.
Section 2825(b) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(3) The limitation contained in the first sentence of
paragraph (1) does not apply to a project for the improve-
ment of a family housing unit or units referred to in that
424
HR 4301 EAS
sentence if the project (including the amount requested for
the project) is identified in the budget materials submitted
to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in connection with
the submission to Congress of the budget for a fiscal year
pursuant to section 1105 of title 31.’’.
SEC. 2802. AUTHORITY TO PAY CLOSING COSTS UNDER
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
Section 1013(c) of the Demonstration Cities and Met-
ropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 3374(c)) is
amended by inserting after the first sentence the following:
‘‘The Secretary may also pay a person who elects to receive
a cash payment under clause (1) of the preceding sentence
an amount that the Secretary determines appropriate to re-
imburse the person for the costs incurred by the person in
the sale of the property if the Secretary determines that such
payment will benefit the person and is in the best interest
of the Federal Government.’’.
Subtitle B—Base Closure Matters
SEC. 2811. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONSIDERATION IN BASE
CLOSURE PROCESS OF ADVANCE CONVER-
SION PLANNING UNDERTAKEN BY POTENTIAL
AFFECTED COMMUNITIES.
(a) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATIONS.—
Subsection (c)(3) of section 2903 of the Defense Base Closure
425
HR 4301 EAS
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Pub-
lic Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘In considering’’;
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(B) In considering military installations for closure
or realignment, the Secretary may not take into account
for any purpose any advance conversion planning under-
taken by an affected community with respect to the antici-
pated closure or realignment of an installation.
‘‘(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case
of a community anticipating the economic effects of a clo-
sure or realignment of a military installation, advance con-
version planning—
‘‘(i) shall include community adjustment and
economic diversification planning undertaken by the
community before an anticipated selection of a mili-
tary installation in or near the community for clo-
sure or realignment; and
‘‘(ii) may include the development of contingency
redevelopment plans, plans for economic development
and diversification, and plans for the joint use (in-
cluding civilian and military use, public and private
use, civilian dual use, and civilian shared use) of the
426
HR 4301 EAS
property or facilities of the installation after the an-
ticipated closure or realignment.’’.
(b) 
COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATIONS.—Subsection
(d)(2) of such section is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(E) In making recommendations under this para-
graph, the Commission may not take into account for any
purpose any advance conversion planning undertaken by
an affected community with respect to the anticipated clo-
sure or realignment of a military installation.’’.
SEC. 2812. CLARIFYING AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO
BASE CLOSURE LAWS.
(a) CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE OF TERMINATION OF
AUTHORITY UNDER 1988 ACT.—Section 202(c) of the De-
fense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Re-
alignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)
is amended—
(1) by striking out ‘‘The authority’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘(1) Except as provided in para-
graph (2), the authority’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(2) The termination of authority set forth in para-
graph (1) shall not apply to the authority of the Secretary
to carry out environmental restoration and waste manage-
427
HR 4301 EAS
ment at, or disposal of property of, military installations
closed or realigned under this title.’’.
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS IN 1988 ACCOUNT
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROPERTY DIS-
POSAL.—Section 207(a)(5) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking out ‘‘Unobligated funds’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘(A) Except as provided in
subparagraph (B), unobligated funds’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(B) The Secretary may, after the termination of au-
thority referred to in subparagraph (A), use any unobli-
gated funds referred to in that subparagraph that are not
transferred in accordance with that subparagraph to carry
out environmental restoration and waste management at,
or disposal of property of, military installations closed or
realigned under this title.’’.
(c) CLARIFICATION OF DISPOSAL AUTHORITY.—
(1) UNDER 1988 ACT.—Section 204(b)(1) of such
Act is amended in the matter above paragraph (1) by
striking out ‘‘real property and facilities’’ and insert-
ing in lieu thereof ‘‘real property, facilities, and per-
sonal property’’.
(2) UNDER 1990 ACT.—Section 2905(b)(1) of the
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990
428
HR 4301 EAS
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended in the matter above
paragraph (1) by striking out ‘‘real property and fa-
cilities’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘real property,
facilities, and personal property’’.
(d) DEFINITION OF REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.—
(1) UNDER 1988 ACT.—Section 209(10) of the De-
fense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure
and Realignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by striking out ‘‘and
for’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘or for’’.
(2) UNDER 1990 ACT.—Section 2910(9) of the De-
fense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by striking out ‘‘and
for’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘or for’’.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made
by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take effect as if in-
cluded in the amendments made by 2918 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
(Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1927).
(e) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS FOR INTERNAL CON-
SISTENCY.—
(1) 1988 ACT.—Section 204(b)(3) of the Defense
Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Re-
429
HR 4301 EAS
alignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687
note) is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking out
‘‘determines to be related to real property and’’;
and
(B) in subparagraph (E), by striking out
‘‘related’’ in the matter above clause (i).
(2) 1990 ACT.—Section 2905(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by striking out ‘‘deter-
mines to be related to real property and’’.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made
by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take effect as if in-
cluded in the amendments made by 2902 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
(Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1909).
SEC. 2813. SENSE OF SENATE ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IN SUPPORT OF
COMMUNITIES 
AFFECTED 
BY 
BASE 
CLO-
SURES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Senate makes the following find-
ings:
430
HR 4301 EAS
(1) The closure or realignment of a major mili-
tary installation can cause severe economic disrup-
tion to the host community for the installation.
(2) Communities affected by the closure of a
major military installation under a base closure law
dedicate significant time, effort, and resources to
planning for the economic redevelopment of the instal-
lation.
(3) The Federal Government can ease the disrup-
tion caused by the closure of a military installation
by working cooperatively with the host community for
the installation to implement the community’s rede-
velopment plan for the installation.
(4) In recent years, the Federal Government has
not always provided sufficient assistance to commu-
nities affected by the closure of a military installation
under a base closure law in the efforts of such commu-
nities to provide for the economic redevelopment of the
installation.
(5) In July 1993, the President issued a five-
point plan for revitalizing base closure communities
which emphasized the economic recovery of commu-
nities affected by the closure of a military installation
under a base closure law.
431
HR 4301 EAS
(6) In November 1993, Congress agreed to the
provisions of subtitle A of title XXIX of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Pub-
lic Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1909), and the amend-
ments made thereunder, in order to implement the
plan referred to in paragraph (5) and to provide
other assistance to communities attempting to rede-
velop military installations approved for closure
under a base closure law.
(7) The Secretary of Defense is accepting public
comment on the guidelines for implementation of the
provisions of law referred to in paragraph (6).
(b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the Sen-
ate that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1) ensure that the regulations implementing the
provisions of subtitle A of title XXIX of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Pub-
lic Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1909), and the amend-
ments made thereunder, reflect the intent of Congress
that, to the maximum extent practicable, the Sec-
retary take into consideration the redevelopment
plans of affected communities when taking actions or
implementing decisions on the closure of a military
installation approved for closure under a base closure
law;
432
HR 4301 EAS
(2) ensure that the regulations implementing
such provisions reflect the intent of Congress to en-
courage and promote cooperation and dialogue be-
tween the Federal Government and communities af-
fected by the closure of an installation throughout the
base closure process; and
(3) develop a system of incentives or awards to
encourage Department of Defense personnel to provide
greater assistance to and cooperation with commu-
nities affected by the closure of an installation during
the ongoing effort of revitalizing the economy of such
communities.
Subtitle C—Land Transactions
Generally
SEC. 2821. LAND TRANSFER, HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE,
NEW MEXICO.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (c) through
(g), not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the
Department of the Air Force, without reimbursement, juris-
diction and control of approximately 1,262 acres of public
lands described in subsection (b). Such public lands are lo-
cated in Otero County, New Mexico, and are contiguous to
Holloman Air Force Base.
433
HR 4301 EAS
(b) DESCRIPTION
OF LANDS TRANSFERRED.—The
lands described in this subsection are as follows:
(1) T17S, R8E, Section 21:
S1⁄2 N1⁄2:
160 acres
E1⁄2 NW1⁄4 NE1⁄4:
20 acres
NE1⁄4 NE1⁄4:
40 acres
(2) T17S, R8E, Section 22:
W1⁄2:
320 acres
W1⁄2 E1⁄2:
160 acres
(3) T17S, R8E, Section 27:
All that part north of New Mexico
Highway 70 except for the E1⁄2 E1⁄2
192 acres
more or
less
(4) T17S, R8E, Section 28:
NE1⁄4:
160 acres
N1⁄2 SE1⁄4:
80 acres
SW1⁄4 SE1⁄4:
40 acres
W1⁄2 SE1⁄4 SE1⁄4:
20 acres
(5) T17S, R8E, Section 33:
NW1⁄4 NE1⁄4:
40 acres
NW1⁄4 NE1⁄4 NE1⁄4:
10 acres
W1⁄2 SW1⁄4 NE1⁄4:
20 acres
(c) USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.—The lands trans-
ferred to the Department of the Air Force under subsection
(a) shall be used by the Secretary of the Air Force for the
construction of new evaporation ponds to support a
wastewater treatment facility that the Secretary shall con-
struct at Holloman Air Force Base.
(d) CATTLE GRAZING RIGHTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The United States recognizes
a grazing preference on the lands transferred to the
Department of the Air Force under subsection (a).
(2) ADJUSTMENT OF GRAZING ALLOTMENT.—(A)
The Secretary of the Air Force shall take such action
as is necessary to ensure that—
(i) the boundary of the grazing allotment
that contains the lands transferred to the De-
partment of the Air Force is adjusted in such
manner as to retain the portion of the allotment
located south of United States Highway 70 in
434
HR 4301 EAS
New Mexico and remove the portion of the lands
that is located north of such highway; and
(ii) the grazing preference referred to in
paragraph (1) is retained by means of transfer-
ring the preference for the area removed from the
allotment under subparagraph (A) to public
lands located south of such highway.
(B) The Secretary of the Air Force shall offer to
enter into an agreement with each person who holds
a permit for grazing on the lands transferred to the
Department of the Air Force at the time of the trans-
fer to provide for the continued grazing by livestock
on the portion of the lands located south of such high-
way.
(e) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF
1969.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure
that the transfer made pursuant to subsection (a) and
the use specified in subsection (c) meet any applicable
requirements of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(2) ENVIRONMENTAL
LAWS.—The Secretary of
the Air Force shall use and manage the lands trans-
ferred under the authority in subsection (a) in such
manner as to ensure compliance with applicable envi-
435
HR 4301 EAS
ronmental laws (including regulations) of the Federal
Government and State of New Mexico, and political
subdivisions thereof.
(3) RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLEANUP OF HAZARD-
OUS SUBSTANCES.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, the Secretary of the Air Force shall, upon
the transfer of the lands under subsection (a), assume
any existing or subsequent responsibility and liability
for the cleanup of hazardous substances (as defined in
section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(42 U.S.C. 9601(14))) located on or within the lands
transferred.
(4) MINING.—The transfer of lands under sub-
section (a) shall be made in such manner as to ensure
the continuation of valid, existing rights under the
mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal
leasing laws of the United States. Subject to the pre-
ceding sentence, upon the transfer of the lands, min-
ing and mineral management activities shall be car-
ried out in the lands in a manner consistent with the
policies of the Department of Defense concerning min-
eral exploration and extraction on lands under the ju-
risdiction of the Department.
436
HR 4301 EAS
(f) RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—The transfer of lands under sub-
section (a) shall not affect the following rights-of-way:
(1) The right-of-way granted to the Otero
County Electric Cooperative, numbered NMNM
58293.
(2) The right-of-way granted to U.S. West
Corporation, numbered NMNM 59261.
(3) The right-of-way granted to the High-
way Department of the State of New Mexico,
numbered LC0 54403.
(g) PUBLIC ACCESS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), the Secretary of the Air Force shall permit
public access to the lands transferred under subsection
(a).
(2) CONSTRUCTION SITE.—The Secretary of the
Air Force may not permit public access to the imme-
diate area affected by the construction of a
wastewater treatment facility in the area with the
legal description of T17S, R8E, Section 22, except
that the Secretary of the Air Force shall permit pub-
lic access on an adjoining unfenced parcel of land—
(A) located along the west boundary of such
area; and
(B) that is 50 feet in width.
437
HR 4301 EAS
(3) PUBLIC USES.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), the Secretary of the Air Force shall permit,
on the lands transferred under subsection (a), public
uses that are consistent with the public uses on adja-
cent lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of
the Interior.
(4) PERMIT NOT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of
the Air Force may not require a permit for access au-
thorized under this subsection to the lands transferred
under subsection (a).
(5) ENTRY
GATE.—The Secretary of the Air
Force shall ensure that the entry gate to the lands
transferred under subsection (a) that is located along
United States Highway 70 shall be open to the public.
SEC. 2822. JOINT USE OF PROPERTY, PORT HUENEME, CALI-
FORNIA.
(a) AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the
Navy may enter into an agreement with the Oxnard Harbor
District, Port Hueneme, California, a special district of the
State of California (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Dis-
trict’’), to provide for the joint use by Secretary and the
District of a parcel of real property consisting of approxi-
mately 25 acres, together with improvements thereto, that
comprises United States Navy Wharf Number 3, the loca-
438
HR 4301 EAS
tion of the Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hue-
neme, California.
(b) PERIOD.—The agreement authorized under sub-
section (a) shall—
(1) be for an initial period of not more than 15
years; and
(2) contain an option for the District to extend
the agreement for three additional periods of 5 years
each.
(c) CONDITIONS.—The agreement authorized under
subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1) That the District suspend operations in the
joint use area during the periods when the Navy con-
ducts operations at the Naval Construction Battalion
Center.
(2) That the District carry out activities in the
joint use area in a manner that does not interfere
with the capability of the Secretary to carry out con-
tingency operations at the Naval Construction Battal-
ion Center.
(d) CONSIDERATION.—(1) As consideration for the use
of the real property under subsection (a), the District—
(A) shall pay to the Secretary the fair market
rental value (as determined by the Secretary) of the
District’s interest in the property; and
439
HR 4301 EAS
(B) may be required to furnish additional con-
sideration as provided in paragraph (2).
(2) The Secretary may require that the agreement in-
clude a provision that the District—
(A) either—
(i) pay the Secretary an amount (as deter-
mined by the Secretary) equal to the cost to the
Navy of replacing at the Naval Construction
Battalion Center the facilities vacated by the
Navy in the joint use area; or
(ii) construct the replacement facilities for
the Navy; and
(B) pay the Secretary an amount (as determined
by the Secretary) equal to the cost to the Navy of relo-
cating Navy operations from the vacated facilities to
the replacement facilities.
(e) NOTICE
AND WAIT REQUIREMENTS.—The Sec-
retary may not enter into the agreement authorized by sub-
section (a) until 21 days after the date on which the Sec-
retary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report contain-
ing an explanation of the terms of the proposed agreement
and a description of the consideration that the Secretary
expects to receive under the agreement.
440
HR 4301 EAS
(f) USE OF PROCEEDS.—(1) The Secretary may use
amounts received under subsection (d)(1)(A) to pay for gen-
eral supervision, administration and overhead expenses in-
curred by the Secretary under the agreement and for im-
provement, maintenance, repair, construction, or restora-
tion of the port operations area or of roads and railways
serving the area at the Naval Construction Battalion Cen-
ter.
(2) The Secretary may use amounts received under
subsection (d)(2) to pay for constructing new facilities, or
making modifications to existing facilities, that are nec-
essary to replace facilities vacated by the Navy in the joint
use area and for relocating operations of the Navy from
the vacated facilities to the replacement facilities.
(g) AUTHORITY TO REPLACE FACILITIES.—The Sec-
retary may authorize the District to demolish existing fa-
cilities in the joint use area and, consistent with the restric-
tions required by subsection (c)(2), construct new facilities
on the property for the joint use of the Navy and the Dis-
trict.
(h) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage
and legal description of the real property subject to the
agreement authorized under this section shall be determined
by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost
of the survey shall be borne by the District.
441
HR 4301 EAS
(i) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions
in connection with the agreement authorized under this sec-
tion as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the
interests of the United States.
SEC. 2823. LEASE OF PROPERTY, NAVAL RADIO RECEIVING
FACILITY, 
IMPERIAL 
BEACH, 
CORONADO,
CALIFORNIA.
(a) LEASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy
may lease to the Young Men’s Christian Association of San
Diego County, a California nonprofit public benefit cor-
poration (in this section referred to as the ‘‘YMCA’’), such
interests in a parcel of real property (including any im-
provements thereon) consisting of approximately 45 acres
at the Naval Radio Receiving Facility, Imperial Beach,
Coronado, California, as the Secretary considers appro-
priate for the YMCA to operate and maintain a summer
youth residence camp known as the YMCA San Diego Uni-
fied Recreational Facility (Camp SURF). Pursuant to the
lease, the Secretary may authorize the YMCA to construct
facilities on the parcel.
(b) LEASE TERMS.—The lease authorized in subsection
(a) shall be for a period of 50 years, or such longer period
as the Secretary determines to be in the best interests of
the United States.
442
HR 4301 EAS
(c) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the lease of
real property under subsection (a), the YMCA shall—
(1) agree to maintain and enhance the natural
resources of the leased premises; and
(2) pay to the United States an amount in cash
equal to the difference between the rental price pre-
scribed by the Secretary under subsection (d) and the
value of natural resources maintenance and enhance-
ments performed by the YMCA, as determined by the
Secretary.
(d) DETERMINATION OF RENTAL PRICE.—The Sec-
retary may prescribe a rental price for the real property
leased under subsection (a) that is less than the fair market
rental value of such property.
(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions
in connection with the lease under subsection (a) as the Sec-
retary considers necessary to protect the operation of the
Naval Radio Receiving Facility, Imperial Beach, Coro-
nado, California, and to protect the interests of the United
States.
443
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2824. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST ON CER-
TAIN 
PROPERTY 
IN 
YORK 
COUNTY 
AND
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AND NEW-
PORT NEWS, VIRGINIA.
(a) RELEASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the
Navy may release the reversionary interest of the United
States in the real property conveyed by the deed described
in subsection (b).
(b) DEED DESCRIPTION.—The deed referred to in sub-
section (a) is a deed between the United States and the
Commonwealth of Virginia dated August 17, 1966, which
conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia certain parcels
of land located in York County and James City County,
Virginia, and the city of Newport News, Virginia.
(c) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary may require
such terms or conditions in connection with the release
under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate
to protect the interests of the United States and to ensure
that the real property will continue to be used for public
purposes.
(d) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary may
execute and file in the appropriate office or offices a deed
of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument
effectuating the release of the reversionary interest under
this section.
444
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2825. LAND TRANSFER, FORT DEVENS, MASSACHU-
SETTS.
(a) TRANSFER.—Notwithstanding any other provision
of law and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the
Army shall transfer administrative jurisdiction of approxi-
mately 800 acres of land at Fort Devens, Massachusetts,
to the Secretary of the Interior for inclusion in the Oxbow
National Wildlife Refuge, Massachusetts.
(b) LIMITATION ON TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the
Army may not carry out the transfer referred to in sub-
section (a) unless the Secretary and the reuse authority for
Fort Devens for the purposes of the Defense Base Closure
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Pub-
lic Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), jointly determine
that the transfer of the land under this section is consistent
with the redevelopment plan prepared under section
2905(b) of such Act.
(c) ADMINISTRATION OF LAND.—The Secretary of the
Interior shall administer the land transferred under this
section in accordance with all laws applicable to areas in
the National Wildlife Refuge System.
(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage
and legal description of the property to be transferred under
this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to
the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior.
445
HR 4301 EAS
SEC. 2826. LAND CONVEYANCE, CORNHUSKER ARMY AMMU-
NITION PLANT, HALL COUNTY, NEBRASKA.
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Subject to subsection
(b), the Secretary of the Army may convey to the Hall
County, Nebraska, Board of Supervisors (in this section re-
ferred to as the ‘‘Board’’), or the designee of the Board, all
right, title and interest of the United States in and to the
real property, together with any improvements thereon, lo-
cated in Hall County, Nebraska, the site of the Cornhusker
Army Ammunition Plant.
(b) REQUIREMENT RELATING TO CONVEYANCE.—The
Secretary may not carry out the conveyance authorized
under subsection (a) until the Secretary completes any envi-
ronmental restoration required with respect to the property
to be conveyed.
(c) UTILIZATION OF PROPERTY.—The Board or its
designee, as the case may be, shall utilize the real property
conveyed under subsection (a) in a manner consistent with
the Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant Reuse Committee
Comprehensive Reuse Plan.
(d) CONSIDERATION.—In consideration for the convey-
ance under subsection (a), the Board or its designee, as the
case may be, shall pay to the United States an amount
equal to the fair market value of the real property to be
conveyed, as determined by the Secretary.
446
HR 4301 EAS
(e) USE OF PROCEEDS.—(1) The Secretary shall de-
posit in the special account established under section
204(h)(2) of the Federal Property and Administrative Serv-
ices Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 485(h)) the amount received
from the Board or its designee under subsection (d).
(2) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) of such section
204(h)(2), the Secretary may use the entire amount depos-
ited in the account under paragraph (1) for the purposes
set forth in subparagraph (B) of such section 204(h)(2).
(f) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage
and legal description of the property conveyed under this
section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the
Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the Board
or its designee, as the case may be.
(g) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions
in connection with the conveyance under this section as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.
SEC. 2827. TRANSFER OR CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PAR-
CELS 
OF 
PROPERTY 
THROUGH 
GENERAL
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the
Administrator of General Services shall—
447
HR 4301 EAS
(A) transfer jurisdiction over all or a portion of
a parcel of real property described in subsection (b)
to another executive agency if the Administrator de-
termines under subsection (c) that the transfer of ju-
risdiction to the agency is appropriate;
(B) convey all or a portion of such a parcel to
a State or local government or nonprofit organization
if the Administrator determines under subsection (d)
that the conveyance to the government or organization
is appropriate; or
(C) convey all or a portion of such a parcel to
the entity specified to receive the conveyance under
subsection (e) in accordance with that subsection.
(2) The Administrator shall carry out an action re-
ferred to in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph
(1) only upon direction by the Secretary of Defense. The
Secretary shall make the direction, if at all, in accordance
with subsection (g).
(3) Upon the direction of the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of the military department concerned shall trans-
fer jurisdiction over an appropriate portion of a parcel of
real property referred to in paragraph (1) to the Adminis-
trator in order to permit the Administrator to carry out
the transfer of jurisdiction over or conveyance of the portion
of the parcel under this section.
448
HR 4301 EAS
(b) COVERED PROPERTY.—(1) The parcels of real
property referred to in subsection (a)(1) are the following:
(A) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements thereon, consisting of approximately 337
acres and located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, the location of
Air Force Plant No. 3.
(B) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements thereon, consisting of approximately 2,900
acres and located in Calverton, New York, the loca-
tion of the Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant.
(C) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements 
thereon, 
located 
in 
Johnson 
City
(Westover), New York, the location of Air Force Plant
No. 59.
(D) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements thereon, consisting of approximately 4
acres and located in Dickinson, North Dakota, the lo-
cation of a support complex, recreational facilities,
and housing facilities for the Radar Bomb Scoring
Site, Dickinson, North Dakota.
(E) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements thereon, consisting of approximately 12
acres and located west of Finley, North Dakota, the
location of a support complex, recreational facilities,
and housing facilities for the Finley Air Force Sta-
449
HR 4301 EAS
tion and Radar Bomb Scoring Site, Finley, North
Dakota.
(F) A parcel of property, including any im-
provements thereon, consisting of approximately 440
acres located at the Hawthorne Army Ammunition
Plant, Mineral County, Nevada, and commonly re-
ferred to as the Babbitt Housing Site.
(G) A parcel of real property, including any im-
provements thereon and the pier associated therewith,
consisting of approximately 118 acres and located in
Harpswell, Maine, the location of the Defense Fuel
Supply Point, Casco Bay, Maine.
(2) The exact acreage and legal description of the real
property referred to in paragraph (1) that is transferred
or conveyed under this section shall be determined by a sur-
vey satisfactory to the Secretary of the military department
concerned. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the Sec-
retary concerned. The transferee or conveyee, if any, of the
property under this section shall reimburse the Secretary
concerned for the cost borne by that Secretary for the survey
of the property.
(c) DETERMINATION OF TRANSFEREES.—(1) Subject
to subsection (a)(2), the Administrator shall transfer juris-
diction over all or a portion of a parcel of real property
referred to in subsection (b)(1) to an executive agency if
450
HR 4301 EAS
the Administrator determines under this subsection that the
transfer is appropriate.
(2) Not later than 5 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Administrator shall inform the heads
of the executive agencies of the availability of the parcels
of real property referred to in subsection (b)(1).
(3) The head of an executive agency having an interest
in obtaining jurisdiction over any portion of a parcel of
real property referred to in paragraph (2) shall notify the
Administrator, in writing, of the interest within such time
as the Administrator shall specify with respect to the parcel
in order to permit the Administrator to determine under
paragraph (4) whether the transfer of jurisdiction to the
agency is appropriate.
(4)(A) The Administrator shall—
(i) evaluate in accordance with section 202(a) of
the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act
of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 483(a)) the notifications of inter-
est, if any, received under paragraph (3) with respect
to a parcel of real property; and
(ii) determine in accordance with that section
the executive agency, if any, to which the transfer of
jurisdiction is appropriate.
(B) The Administrator shall complete the determina-
tion under subparagraph (A) with respect to a parcel not
456
HR 4301 EAS
(2) The report shall include with respect to each parcel
of real property referred to in subsection (b)(1) the following
information:
(A) The interest, if any, for all or a portion of
the parcel that was expressed by executive agencies
under subsection (c) or by governments or nonprofit
organizations under subsection (d).
(B) The use, if any, proposed for the portion of
the parcel under each expression of interest.
(C) The determination of the Administrator
whether a transfer or conveyance of all or a portion
of the parcel, as the case may be, to the agency, gov-
ernment, or organization was appropriate.
(D) The other disposal options, if any, that the
Administrator has identified for the parcel.
(E) Any other matters that the Administrator
considers appropriate.
(g) DESIGNATION OF AUTHORITY TO BE USED.—(1)
If the Administrator submits the report required under sub-
section (f) within the time specified in that subsection, the
Secretary of Defense may direct the Administrator under
subsection (a)(2) to carry out the transfer or conveyance
under subsection (c) or (d) of all or a portion of a parcel
of property referred to in subsection (b)(1) in accordance
with the determinations made by the Administrator with