meets the requirements of the Information Quality 
Act. 
‘‘(6) Upon petition by an interested person who 
has participated in the rule making, other issues rel-
evant to the rule making, unless the agency deter-
mines that consideration of the issues at the hearing 
would not advance consideration of the rule or 
would, in light of the nature of the need for agency 
action, unreasonably delay completion of the rule 
making. An agency shall grant or deny a petition 
under this paragraph within 30 days of its receipt 
of the petition. 
No later than 45 days before any hearing held under this 
subsection or sections 556 and 557, the agency shall pub-
lish in the Federal Register a notice specifying the pro-
posed rule to be considered at such hearing, the issues 
to be considered at the hearing, and the time and place 
for such hearing, except that such notice may be issued 
not later than 15 days before a hearing held under sub-
section (d)(4)(B). 
‘‘(f) FINAL RULES.—(1) The agency shall adopt a 
rule only following consultation with the Administrator of 
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to facili-
tate compliance with applicable rule making requirements. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H185.IH
H185
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) The agency shall adopt a rule only on the basis 
of the best reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, eco-
nomic, and other evidence and information concerning the 
need for, consequences of, and alternatives to the rule. 
‘‘(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 
agency shall adopt the least costly rule considered during 
the rule making (including all costs to be considered under 
subsection (b)(6)) that meets relevant statutory objectives. 
‘‘(B) The agency may adopt a rule that is more costly 
than the least costly alternative that would achieve the rel-
evant statutory objectives only if the additional benefits 
of the more costly rule justify its additional costs and only 
if the agency explains its reason for doing so based on 
interests of public health, safety or welfare that are clearly 
within the scope of the statutory provision authorizing the 
rule. 
‘‘(4) When it adopts a final rule, the agency shall 
publish a notice of final rule making. The notice shall in-
clude— 
‘‘(A) a concise, general statement of the rule’s 
basis and purpose; 
‘‘(B) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
of need for a rule to address the problem the agency 
seeks to address with the rule, including a statement 
of whether a rule is required by statute and a sum-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H185.IH
H185
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
mary of any final risk assessment or regulatory im-
pact analysis prepared by the agency; 
‘‘(C) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
that the benefits of the rule meet the relevant statu-
tory objectives and justify the rule’s costs (including 
all costs to be considered under subsection (b)(6)); 
‘‘(D) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
not to adopt any of the alternatives to the proposed 
rule considered by the agency during the rule mak-
ing, including— 
‘‘(i) the agency’s reasoned final determina-
tion that no alternative considered achieved the 
relevant statutory objectives with lower costs 
(including all costs to be considered under sub-
section (b)(6)) than the rule; or 
‘‘(ii) the agency’s reasoned determination 
that its adoption of a more costly rule complies 
with subsection (f)(3)(B); 
‘‘(E) the agency’s reasoned final determina-
tion— 
‘‘(i) that existing rules have not created or 
contributed to the problem the agency seeks to 
address with the rule; or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H185.IH
H185
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(ii) that existing rules have created or 
contributed to the problem the agency seeks to 
address with the rule, and, if so— 
‘‘(I) why amendment or rescission of 
such existing rules is not alone sufficient 
to respond to the problem; and 
‘‘(II) whether and how the agency in-
tends to amend or rescind the existing rule 
separate from adoption of the rule; 
‘‘(F) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
that the evidence and other information upon which 
the agency bases the rule complies with the Informa-
tion Quality Act; 
‘‘(G) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
that the rule meets the objectives that the agency 
identified in subsection (d)(1)(E)(iii) or that other 
objectives are more appropriate in light of the full 
administrative record and the rule meets those ob-
jectives; 
‘‘(H) the agency’s reasoned final determination 
that it did not deviate from the metrics the agency 
included in subsection (d)(1)(E)(iii) or that other 
metrics are more appropriate in light of the full ad-
ministrative record and the agency did not deviate 
from those metrics; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H185.IH
H185
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(I)(i) for any major rule, high-impact rule, or 
negative-impact on jobs and wages rule, the agency’s 
plan for review of the rule no less than every ten 
years to determine whether, based upon evidence, 
there remains a need for the rule, whether the rule 
is in fact achieving statutory objectives, whether the 
rule’s benefits continue to justify its costs, and 
whether the rule can be modified or rescinded to re-
duce costs while continuing to achieve statutory ob-
jectives; and 
‘‘(ii) review of a rule under a plan required by 
clause (i) of this subparagraph shall take into ac-
count the factors and criteria set forth in sub-
sections (b) through (f) of section 553 of this title; 
and 
‘‘(J) for any negative-impact on jobs and wages 
rule, a statement that the head of the agency that 
made the rule approved the rule knowing about the 
findings and determination of the agency or the Ad-
ministrator of the Office of Information and Regu-
latory Affairs that qualified the rule as a negative 
impact on jobs and wages rule. 
All information considered by the agency in connection 
with its adoption of the rule, and, at the discretion of the 
President or the Administrator of the Office of Informa-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H185.IH
H185
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS