(27) SUNNYSIDE BROOK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, 
NEW YORK.—Project for flood damage reduction, Sun-
nyside Brook, Westchester County, New York. 
(28) LITTLE
YANKEE
RUN, OHIO.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Little Yankee Run, Ohio. 
(29) LITTLE
NESHAMINY
CREEK, WARRENTON, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, 
Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrenton, Pennsylvania. 
(30) SOUTHAMPTON CREEK WATERSHED, SOUTH-
AMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for flood damage 
reduction, Southampton Creek watershed, South-
ampton, Pennsylvania. 
(31) SPRING CREEK, LOWER MACUNGIE TOWN-
SHIP, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for flood damage re-
duction, Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, 
Pennsylvania. 
(32) YARDLEY AQUEDUCT, SILVER AND BROCK 
CREEKS, YARDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and 
Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania. 
(33) SURFSIDE
BEACH, SOUTH
CAROLINA.—
Project for flood damage reduction, Surfside Beach 
and vicinity, South Carolina.
(34) 
CONGELOSI
DITCH, 
MISSOURI
CITY, 
TEXAS.—Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction, 
Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas. 
(35) DILLEY, TEXAS.—Project for flood damage 
reduction, Dilley, Texas. 
(b) SPECIAL RULES.—
(1) CACHE RIVER BASIN, GRUBBS, ARKANSAS.—
The Secretary may proceed with the project for the 
Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas, referred to in 
subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that the project is 
located within the boundaries of the flood control 
project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950, (64 Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 
41). 
(2) WILDWOOD CREEK, YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA.—
The Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan 
for the project for flood damage, Wildwood Creek, 
California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) and, if 
the Secretary determines that the plan meets the eval-
uation and design standards of the Corps of Engi-
neers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may 
use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the
project for the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the project. 
(3) BORUP, MINNESOTA.—In carrying out the 
project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of 
the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, referred to in 
subsection (a)(21) the Secretary may consider na-
tional ecosystem restoration benefits in determining 
the Federal interest in the project and shall allow the 
non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of 
the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4184) to the extent that the Secretary’s evaluation in-
dicates that applying such section is necessary to im-
plement the project. 
(4) ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.—In carrying 
out the project for flood damage reduction, Itasca 
County, Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(18) 
the Secretary may consider national ecosystem res-
toration benefits in determining the Federal interest 
in the project. 
(5) DILLEY, TEXAS.—The Secretary shall carry 
out the project for flood damage reduction, Dilley,
Texas, referred to in subsection (a)(35) if the Sec-
retary determines that the project is feasible. 
SEC. 
1003. 
SMALL 
PROJECTS 
FOR 
EMERGENCY 
STREAMBANK PROTECTION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r): 
(1) OUACHITA
AND
BLACK
RIVERS, ARKANSAS 
AND LOUISIANA.—Projects for emergency streambank 
protection, Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and 
Louisiana. 
(2) FRANKLIN
POINT
PARK, ANNE
ARUNDEL 
COUNTY, 
MARYLAND.—Project 
for 
emergency 
streambank protection, Franklin Point Park, Anne 
Arundel County, Maryland. 
(3) MAYO BEACH PARK, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, 
MARYLAND.—Project for emergency streambank pro-
tection, Mayo Beach Park, Anne Arundel County, 
Maryland. 
(4) PINEY
POINT
LIGHTHOUSE, 
ST. 
MARY’S 
COUNTY, 
MARYLAND.—Project 
for 
emergency 
streambank protection, Piney Point Lighthouse, St. 
Mary’s County, Maryland.