datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2931 
To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
expand the eligibility requirement to include Predominantly Black Institu-
tions of higher education. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2005 
Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 to expand the eligibility requirement to include 
Predominantly Black Institutions of higher education. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HBCU Expansion Act 
of 2005’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following: 
(1) Over the last several years post-secondary 
institutions have faced a dramatic increase in the
number of non-traditional students. Predominantly 
Black Institutions, following the pattern of histori-
cally Black colleges and universities (referred to as 
‘‘HBCU’s’’), have helped ease the influx by offering 
an affordable quality education. 
(2) Currently, more than 100,000 students at-
tend Predominantly Black Institutions. Similar to 
HBCU’s the majority of these students depend heav-
ily on Federal financial aid to graduate from college. 
(3) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 
HBCU’s, provide opportunities for minority students 
to pursue post-secondary degrees. 
(4) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 
HBCU’s, have produced a cadre of leaders who 
make up a significant number of the Nation’s minor-
ity doctors, lawyers, and other professionals. 
(5) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 
HBCU’s, provide students from under-served com-
munities with academic and emotional support which 
translates to high retention and graduation rates. 
SEC. 3. QUALIFYING PREDOMINANTLY BLACK INSTITU-
TIONS. 
Section 322 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1061) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2)—
(A) by striking ‘‘means any’’ and inserting 
‘‘means (A) any’’; and 
(B) by inserting before the period at the 
end the following: ‘‘or (B) any Predominantly 
Black Institution’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(6) The term ‘Predominantly Black Institu-
tion’ means any institution of higher education 
that— 
‘‘(A) is an eligible institution under section 
312(b) that complies with paragraph (1)(C)(i) 
of such section; and 
‘‘(B) at the time of application, has a stu-
dent enrollment of at least 500 full-time stu-
dents, at least 51 percent of whom are African 
Americans.’’. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2932 
To amend the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979 
to modify restrictions on the provisions of air transportation to and 
from Love Field, Texas. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2005 
Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To amend the International Air Transportation Competition 
Act of 1979 to modify restrictions on the provisions 
of air transportation to and from Love Field, Texas. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. MODIFY CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS. 
Subsection (c) of section 29 of the International Air 
Transportation Competition Act of 1979 (Public Law 96– 
192; 94 Stat. 48 et seq.) is amended by inserting ‘‘Ten-
nessee,’’ before ‘‘and Texas’’. 
Æ
H. R. 2985—20
shall, promptly upon such removal, communicate in writing 
the reasons for any such removal to each House of the Congress. 
(d) DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AUTHORITY, AND REPORTS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Sections 4, 5 (other than subsections 
(a)(13)), 6(a) (other than paragraphs (7) and (8) thereof), and 
7 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) shall 
apply to the Inspector General of the Library of Congress 
and the Office of such Inspector General and such sections 
shall be applied to the Library of Congress and the Librarian 
of Congress by substituting—
(A) ‘‘Library of Congress’’ for ‘‘establishment’’; and 
(B) ‘‘Librarian of Congress’’ for ‘‘head of the establish-
ment’’. 
(2) EMPLOYEES.—The Inspector General, in carrying out 
the provisions of this section, is authorized to select, appoint, 
and employ such officers and employees (including consultants) 
as may be necessary for carrying out the functions, powers, 
and duties of the Office of Inspector General subject to the 
provisions of law governing selections, appointments, and 
employment in the Library of Congress. 
(e) TRANSFERS.—All functions, personnel, and budget resources 
of the Office of Investigations of the Library of Congress are trans-
ferred to the Office of Inspector General. 
(f) INCUMBENT.—The individual who serves in the position of 
Inspector General of the Library of Congress on the date of enact-
ment of this Act shall continue to serve in that position, subject 
to removal in accordance with this section. 
(g) REFERENCES.—References in any other Federal law, Execu-
tive order, rule, regulation, or delegation of authority, or any docu-
ment of or relating to the Inspector General of the Library of 
Congress shall be deemed to refer to the Inspector General of 
the Library of Congress as set forth under this section. 
(h) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be effective upon enact-
ment of this Act. 
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 
CONGRESSIONAL PRINTING AND BINDING 
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS) 
For authorized printing and binding for the Congress and the 
distribution of Congressional information in any format; printing 
and binding for the Architect of the Capitol; expenses necessary 
for preparing the semimonthly and session index to the Congres-
sional Record, as authorized by law (section 902 of title 44, United 
States Code); printing and binding of Government publications 
authorized by law to be distributed to Members of Congress; and 
printing, binding, and distribution of Government publications 
authorized by law to be distributed without charge to the recipient, 
$88,090,000: Provided, That this appropriation shall not be avail-
able for paper copies of the permanent edition of the Congressional 
Record for individual Representatives, Resident Commissioners or 
Delegates authorized under section 906 of title 44, United States 
Code: Provided further, That this appropriation shall be available 
for the payment of obligations incurred under the appropriations 
for similar purposes for preceding fiscal years: Provided further, 
That notwithstanding the 2-year limitation under section 718 of
V 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2645
For the relief of Web’s Construction Company, Incorporated. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 25, 2005
Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
For the relief of Web’s Construction Company, Incorporated.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION WORK. 
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to 
Web’s Construction Company, Incorporated, a company 
incorporated in the State of Maryland, $262,500, plus a 
reasonable rate of interest (as determined by the Sec-
retary) for the period beginning February 1, 1990, and 
ending on the date of such payment, for construction work 
performed for the benefit of the Corps of Engineers in 
connection with Contract No. DACA31–88–C–0316. Pay-
ment of the sum shall be in full satisfaction of any claim 
of Web’s Construction Company, Incorporated, against 
the United States in connection with the construction 
work. 
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES. 
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid 
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service 
rendered in connection with the claim described in section 
1. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of 
an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in the amount 
provided in title 18, United States Code.
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2646 
To eliminate certain restrictions on air transportation to and from Love 
Field, Texas. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 26, 2005 
Mr. HENSARLING (for himself and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To eliminate certain restrictions on air transportation to 
and from Love Field, Texas. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Fly Act’’. 
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION. 
Section 29 of the International Air Transportation 
Competition Act of 1979 (94 Stat. 48) is repealed. 
Æ
described in clause (ii) or (iv) in the matter following sec-
tion 211(a)(15) for any taxable year that does not begin 
with or during a particular calendar year and end with 
or during such year, the self-employment income of such 
individual deemed to be derived during such taxable year 
shall be allocated to the two calendar years, portions of 
which are included within such taxable year, in the same 
proportion to the total of such deemed self-employment 
income as the sum of the amounts applicable under section 
213(d) for the calendar quarters ending with or within 
each such calendar year bears to the lower limit for such 
taxable year specified in section 211(k)(1).’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2007. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:17 Nov 17, 2007
Jkt 038715
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4215.IH
H4215
hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
(B) some of those products are imported 
from foreign countries in which asbestos is 
poorly regulated; 
(6) there is no known safe level of exposure to 
asbestos; 
(7) even low levels of exposure to asbestos may 
cause asbestos-related diseases, including mesothe-
lioma; 
(8) millions of workers in the United States 
have been, and continue to be, exposed to dangerous 
levels of asbestos; 
(9) worker deaths from noncancerous lung dis-
ease can occur at levels of exposure to asbestos 
below the levels allowed by the Occupational Safety 
and Health Administration as of the date of enact-
ment of this Act; 
(10) families of workers are put at risk because 
of asbestos brought home by the workers on the 
shoes, clothes, skin, and hair of the workers; 
(11) approximately 1⁄3 of mesothelioma victims 
were exposed to asbestos while serving the United 
States on Navy ships or shipyards; 
(12) the National Institutes of Health reported 
to Congress in 2006 that mesothelioma is a difficult 
disease to detect, diagnose, and treat; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:21 Aug 04, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3285.IH
H3285
hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
tion 318) by members of such affili-
ated group. 
Such term shall not include any corpora-
tion which is permitted to file a consoli-
dated return with such affiliated group. 
‘‘(E) CERTAIN
SERVICES
DEFINED.—For 
purposes of paragraph (2), the terms ‘engineer-
ing’ and ‘architecture’ include— 
‘‘(i) the performance of professional 
services described in section 1102(2) of 
title 40, United States Code, and 
‘‘(ii) design-build and its various op-
tions, including financing, owning, and op-
eration.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ
‘‘(ii) Any designation under this sub-
section shall cease to have effect upon an 
Act of Congress disapproving such des-
ignation. 
‘‘(3) RECORD.—In making a designation under 
this subsection, the Attorney General shall create an 
administrative record. 
‘‘(4) PERIOD OF DESIGNATION.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A designation under 
this subsection shall be effective for all purposes 
until revoked under paragraph (5) or (6) or set 
aside pursuant to subsection (b). 
‘‘(B) REVIEW OF DESIGNATION UPON PE-
TITION.— 
‘‘(i) 
IN
GENERAL.—The 
Attorney 
General shall review the designation of a 
criminal street gang under the procedures 
set forth in clauses (iii) and (iv) if the des-
ignated gang or association files a petition 
for revocation within the petition period 
described in clause (ii). 
‘‘(ii) PETITION
PERIOD.—For pur-
poses of clause (i)— 
‘‘(I) if the designated gang or as-
sociation has not previously filed a pe-
tition for revocation under this sub-
paragraph, the petition period begins 
2 years after the date on which the 
designation was made; or 
‘‘(II) if the designated gang or 
association has previously filed a peti-
tion for revocation under this sub-
paragraph, the petition period begins 
2 years after the date of the deter-
mination made under clause (iv) on 
that petition. 
‘‘(iii) 
PROCEDURES.—Any 
criminal 
street gang that submits a petition for rev-
ocation under this subparagraph must pro-
vide evidence in that petition that the rel-
evant circumstances described in para-
graph (1) are sufficiently different from 
the circumstances that were the basis for 
the designation such that a revocation with 
respect to the gang is warranted. 
‘‘(iv) DETERMINATION.— 
‘‘(I) IN
GENERAL.—Not later 
than 180 days after receiving a peti-
tion for revocation submitted under 
this subparagraph, the Attorney Gen-
eral shall make a determination as to 
such revocation. 
‘‘(II) PUBLICATION
OF
DETER-
MINATION.—A determination made by 
the Attorney General under this 
clause shall be published in the Fed-
eral Register. 
‘‘(III) PROCEDURES.—Any rev-
ocation by the Attorney General shall 
be made in accordance with para-
graph (6). 
‘‘(C) OTHER REVIEW OF DESIGNATION.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—If in a 5-year pe-
riod no review has taken place under sub-
paragraph (B), the Attorney General shall 
review the designation of the criminal 
street gang in order to determine whether 
such designation should be revoked pursu-
ant to paragraph (6). 
‘‘(ii) PROCEDURES.—If a review does 
not take place pursuant to subparagraph 
(B) in response to a petition for revocation 
that is filed in accordance with that sub-
paragraph, then the review shall be con-
ducted pursuant to procedures established
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2648 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require Medicaid drug 
utilization review programs to deny coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs 
for individuals registered (or required to be registered) as sex offenders. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 26, 2005 
Mr. FOSSELLA (for himself, Mr. STEARNS, Mrs. MCCARTHY, Mr. WALDEN of 
Oregon, Mr. NEY, Mr. GOODE, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. GIBBONS, 
and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 
Medicaid drug utilization review programs to deny cov-
erage of erectile dysfunction drugs for individuals reg-
istered (or required to be registered) as sex offenders. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REQUIRING MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION RE-
VIEW PROGRAMS TO DENY COVERAGE OF 
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION DRUGS FOR INDI-
VIDUALS REGISTERED (OR REQUIRED TO BE 
REGISTERED) AS SEX OFFENDERS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1927(g)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(g)(2)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) DENIAL OF COVERAGE OF ERECTILE 
DYSFUNCTION DRUGS FOR INDIVIDUALS REG-
ISTERED (OR REQUIRED TO BE REGISTERED) AS 
SEX OFFENDERS.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The program shall 
provide for denying coverage for any erec-
tile dysfunction drug for any individual 
who is registered (or a person required to 
register) under section 170101 or 170102 
of the Violent Crime Control and Law En-
forcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14071, 
14072). 
‘‘(ii) REPORT
ON
ENFORCEMENT.— 
Not later than 6 months after the date of 
the enactment of this subparagraph, each 
State shall submit to the Secretary a re-
port on specific steps the State has taken
under its program to assure the denial of 
coverage described in clause (i).’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act and shall apply to the denial of drugs 
furnished on or after such date. 
Æ
by the Attorney General. The results of 
such review and the applicable procedures 
shall not be reviewable in any court. 
‘‘(iii) PUBLICATION OF RESULTS OF 
REVIEW.—The Attorney General shall pub-
lish any determination made pursuant to 
this subparagraph in the Federal Register. 
‘‘(5) REVOCATION BY ACT OF CONGRESS.—The 
Congress, by an Act of Congress, may block or re-
voke a designation made under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(6) REVOCATION BASED ON CHANGE IN CIR-
CUMSTANCES.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General 
may revoke a designation made under para-
graph (1) at any time, and shall revoke a des-
ignation upon completion of a review conducted 
pursuant to subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
paragraph (4) if the Attorney General finds 
that— 
‘‘(i) the circumstances that were the 
basis for the designation have changed in 
such a manner as to warrant revocation; or 
‘‘(ii) the national security of the 
United States warrants a revocation.
‘‘(B) PROCEDURE.—The procedural re-
quirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) shall 
apply to a revocation under this paragraph. Any 
revocation shall take effect on the date specified 
in the revocation or upon publication in the 
Federal Register if no effective date is specified. 
‘‘(7) EFFECT OF REVOCATION.—The revocation 
of a designation under paragraph (5) or (6) shall 
not affect any action or proceeding based on conduct 
committed prior to the effective date of such revoca-
tion. 
‘‘(8) USE OF DESIGNATION IN HEARING.—If a 
designation under this subsection has become effec-
tive under paragraph (2)(B) an alien in a removal 
proceeding shall not be permitted to raise any ques-
tion concerning the validity of the issuance of such 
designation as a defense or an objection at any hear-
ing. 
‘‘(b) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESIGNATION.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days 
after publication of the designation in the Federal 
Register, an group or association designated as a 
criminal street gang may seek judicial review of the 
designation in the United States Court of Appeals 
for the District of Columbia Circuit.
‘‘(2) BASIS
OF
REVIEW.—Review under this 
subsection shall be based solely upon the administra-
tive record. 
‘‘(3) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—The Court shall hold 
unlawful and set aside a designation the court finds 
to be— 
‘‘(A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of dis-
cretion, or otherwise not in accordance with 
law; 
‘‘(B) contrary to constitutional right, 
power, privilege, or immunity; 
‘‘(C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, au-
thority, or limitation, or short of statutory 
right; 
‘‘(D) lacking substantial support in the ad-
ministrative record taken as a whole; or 
‘‘(E) not in accord with the procedures re-
quired by law. 
‘‘(4) JUDICIAL REVIEW INVOKED.—The pend-
ency of an action for judicial review of a designation 
shall not affect the application of this section, unless 
the court issues a final order setting aside the des-
ignation. 
‘‘(c) RELEVANT COMMITTEE DEFINED.—As used in 
this section, the term ‘relevant committees’ means the
Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representa-
tives and of the Senate.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con-
tents for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 219 the following: 
‘‘Sec. 219A. Designation of criminal street gangs.’’. 
SEC. 3. MANDATORY DETENTION OF SUSPECTED CRIMINAL 
STREET GANG MEMBERS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 236(c)(1)(D) of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1)(D)) 
is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘or 212(a)(2)(J)’’ after 
‘‘212(a)(3)(B)’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘or 237(a)(2)(F)’’ before 
‘‘237(a)(4)(B)’’. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than March 1 of 
each year (beginning 1 year after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act), the Secretary of Homeland Security, 
after consultation with the appropriate Federal agencies, 
shall submit a report to the Committees on the Judiciary 
of the House of Representatives and of the Senate on the 
number of aliens detained under the amendments made 
by subsection (a).
SEC. 4. INELIGIBILITY FROM PROTECTION FROM REMOVAL 
AND ASYLUM. 
(a) INAPPLICABILITY OF RESTRICTION ON REMOVAL 
TO CERTAIN COUNTRIES.—Section 241(b)(3)(B) of the 
Immigration 
and 
Nationality 
Act 
(8 
U.S.C. 
1251(b)(3)(B)) is amended, in the matter preceding 
clause (i), by inserting ‘‘who is described in section 
212(a)(2)(J)(i) or section 237(a)(2)(F)(i) or who is’’ after 
‘‘to an alien’’. 
(b) 
INELIGIBILITY
FOR
ASYLUM.—Section 
208(b)(2)(A) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2)(A)) is 
amended— 
(1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(2) by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (vii); 
and 
(3) by inserting after clause (v) the following: 
‘‘(vi) the alien is described in section 
212(a)(2)(J)(i) or section 237(a)(2)(F)(i) 
(relating to participation in criminal street 
gangs); or’’. 
(c) DENIAL OF REVIEW OF DETERMINATION OF IN-
ELIGIBILITY
FOR TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS.— 
Section 244(c)(2) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1254(c)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.— 
There shall be no judicial review of any finding
under subparagraph (B) that an alien is in de-
scribed in section 208(b)(2)(A)(vi).’’. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2934 
To authorize Federal payment to emergency ambulance and medical services 
providers for the cost of uncompensated care of aliens aided by the 
border patrol or other Federal immigration official. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2005 
Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. KOLBE, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Mr. 
FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To authorize Federal payment to emergency ambulance and 
medical services providers for the cost of uncompensated 
care of aliens aided by the border patrol or other Federal 
immigration official. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay for All Your Un-
documented Procedures (PAY UP!) Act of 2005’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING FEDERAL PAYMENT TO EMERGENCY 
AMBULANCE AND MEDICAL SERVICES PRO-
VIDERS FOR THE COST OF UNCOMPENSATED 
CARE OF ALIENS AIDED BY THE BORDER PA-
TROL OR OTHER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION OF-
FICIAL. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case described in sub-
section (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, 
from amounts appropriated under subsection (c), provide 
payment to the hospital, health clinic, or other provider 
of the ambulance or other emergency services described 
in subsection (b) appropriate reimbursement for the costs 
of such emergency services, but only to the extent that 
such costs are not otherwise reimbursed through any Fed-
eral program and cannot be recovered from the alien or 
another person. 
(b) CASE OF INJURED ALIEN DESCRIBED.—A case 
described in this subsection is the case of an alien to whom 
a border patrol officer or other Federal immigration offi-
cial provides assistance in any form, directly or indirectly, 
in seeking or obtaining emergency medical assistance, in-
cluding contacting an ambulance service for the transport 
of the alien to an appropriate medical facility for the re-
ceipt of emergency services. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year, be-
ginning with fiscal year 2006, such sums as may be nec-
essary to carry out this section. 
Æ