224
(3) CONTENTS.—The plan shall include a com-
prehensive report and a programmatic environmental
impact statement covering the proposed Federal ac-
tion set forth in the plan.
(4) ADDITIONAL
STUDIES
AND
ANALYSES.—
After transmission of a report under this subsection,
the Secretary may conduct studies and analyses of
projects related to the comprehensive plan that are
appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
(c) INTEGRATION OF OTHER ACTIVITIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In developing the plan under
subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate ongoing
Federal and State projects and activities, including
projects implemented under the Coastal Wetlands
Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (16
U.S.C. 3951 et seq.), the Louisiana Coastal Wet-
lands Conservation Plan, the Louisiana Coastal
Zone Management Plan, and the plan of the State
of Louisiana entitled ‘‘Coast 2050: Toward a Sus-
tainable Coastal Louisiana’’.
(2) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—
(A) EXISTING
AUTHORITY.—Except as
otherwise expressly provided for in this section,
nothing in the section affects any authority in
effect on the date of enactment of this Act, or
225
any requirement relating to the participation in
protection or restoration activities in the Coast-
al Louisiana Ecosystem, including projects and
activities specified in paragraph (1) of—
(i) the Department of the Army;
(ii) the Department of the Interior;
(iii) the Department of Commerce;
(iv) the Environmental Protection
Agency;
(v) the Department of Agriculture;
(vi) the Department of Transpor-
tation;
(vii) the Department of Energy; and
(viii) the State of Louisiana.
(B) NEW
AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this
section confers any new regulatory authority on
any Federal or non-Federal entity that carries
out any activity authorized by this section.
(d) COST SHARING.—The non-Federal share of the
cost of developing the plan under subsection (b) shall be
50 percent.
(e) COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION
AND RESTORATION TASK FORCE.—
(1) 
ESTABLISHMENT
AND
MEMBERSHIP.—
There is established the Coastal Louisiana Eco-
226
system Protection and Restoration Task Force,
which shall consist of the following members (or, in
the case of the head of a Federal Agency, a designee
at the level of Assistant Secretary or an equivalent
level):
(A) The Secretary.
(B) The Secretary of the Interior.
(C) The Secretary of Commerce.
(D) The Administrator of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency.
(E) The Secretary of Agriculture.
(F) The Secretary of Transportation.
(G) The Secretary of Energy.
(H) The Coastal Advisor to the Governor.
(I) The Secretary of the Louisiana Depart-
ment of Natural Resources.
(J) A representative of the Governor’s Ad-
visory Commission on Coastal Restoration and
Conservation, Louisiana.
(2) DUTIES
OF
TASK
FORCE.—The Task
Force—
(A) shall consult with, and provide rec-
ommendations to, the Secretary during develop-
ment of the comprehensive plan under sub-
section (b)(1);
227
(B) shall coordinate the development of
consistent policies, strategies, plans, programs,
projects, activities, and priorities for addressing
the protection, conservation, and restoration of
the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem;
(C) shall exchange information regarding
programs, projects, and activities of the agen-
cies and entities represented on the Task Force
to promote ecosystem protection, restoration,
and maintenance;
(D) shall establish a regional working
group which shall include representatives of the
agencies and entities represented on the Task
Force as well as other governmental entities as
appropriate for the purpose of formulating, rec-
ommending, coordinating, and implementing
policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects,
activities, and priorities of the Task Force;
(E) may allow the working group described
in subparagraph (D) to—
(i) establish such advisory bodies as
are necessary to assist the Task Force in
its duties; and
228
(ii) select as an advisory body any en-
tity that represents a broad variety of pri-
vate and public interests;
(F) shall facilitate the resolution of inter-
agency and intergovernmental conflicts associ-
ated with the protection, conservation, and res-
toration of the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem;
(G) shall coordinate scientific research as-
sociated with the protection and restoration of
the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem;
(H) shall provide assistance and support to
agencies and entities represented on the Task
Force in their protection and restoration activi-
ties;
(I) shall prepare an integrated financial
plan and recommendations for coordinated
budget requests for the funds proposed to be
expended by agencies and entities represented
on the Task Force for the protection, conserva-
tion, and restoration of the Coastal Louisiana
Ecosystem; and
(J) shall transmit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on Envi-
ronment and Public Works of the Senate a re-
229
port that summarizes the activities of the Task
Force.
(3) PROCEDURES AND ADVICE.—
(A) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.—
(i) IN
GENERAL.—The Task Force
shall implement procedures to facilitate
public participation in the advisory proc-
ess, including providing advance notice of
meetings, providing adequate opportunity
for public input and comment, maintaining
appropriate records, and making a record
of proceedings of meetings available for
public inspection.
(ii) OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary shall
ensure that the procedures described in
clause (i) are adopted and implemented
and that the records described in clause (i)
are accurately maintained and available for
public inspection.
(B) ADVISORS TO THE TASK FORCE AND
WORKING
GROUPS.—The Task Force or the
working group described in paragraph (2)(D)
may seek such advice and input from any inter-
ested, knowledgeable, or affected party as the
Task Force or working group determines to be
230
necessary to perform the duties described in
paragraph (2).
(C) APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL ADVI-
SORY COMMITTEE ACT.—The Task Force, advi-
sors to the Task Force, and any associated
workgroups shall not be considered advisory
committees under the Federal Advisory Com-
mittee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
(4) COMPENSATION.—A member of the Task
Force shall receive no additional compensation for
the services provided as a member of the Task
Force.
(5) TRAVEL
EXPENSES.—Travel expenses in-
curred by a member of the Task Force in the per-
formance of services for the Task Force shall be
paid by the agency or entity that the member rep-
resents.
SEC. 5059. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.
Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220)
is amended by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$35,000,000’’.
SEC. 5060. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.
For purposes of carrying out section 121 of the Fed-
eral Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1271), the
231
Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, basin stakeholders con-
ference convened by the Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
and United States Geological Survey on February 25,
2002, shall be treated as being a management conference
convened under section 320 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1330).
SEC. 5061. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.
Section 517(5) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Par-
ish, Louisiana, project for waterfront and riverine
preservation, restoration, enhancement modifica-
tions, and interpretive center development.’’.
SEC. 5062. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND, VIR-
GINIA, PENNSYLVANIA, AND DELAWARE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out comprehensive
study of the feasibility of a project to address shoreline
erosion and related sediment management measures to
protect water and land resources of the Chesapeake Bay,
the Secretary may carry out pilot projects to demonstrate
the feasibility of alternative measures to address sediment
loads to the Chesapeake Bay from sediment behind dams
on the lower Susquehanna River.
232
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this
section.
SEC. 5063. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, MARY-
LAND.
(a) ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may provide tech-
nical assistance to the Secretary of Agriculture in carrying
out the Conservation Corridor Demonstration Program
authorized under subtitle G of title II of Public Law 107–
171 (116 Stat. 275–278).
(b) COORDINATION AND INTEGRATION.—In carrying
out water resources projects in the State of Maryland on
land located on the east side of the Chesapeake Bay, the
Secretary shall coordinate and integrate, to the extent
practicable, such projects with any activities undertaken
to implement a conservation corridor plan approved by the
Secretary of Agriculture under section 2602 of Public Law
107–171 (116 Stat. 275–276).
SEC. 5064. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.
Section 568(c)(2) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended by striking
‘‘$1,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$25,000,000’’.
SEC. 5065. OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN.
Section 219(f)(29) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336) is amended by inserting
233
‘‘sanitary sewer overflows and’’ before ‘‘combined sewer
overflows’’.
SEC. 5066. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHI-
GAN.
The Secretary shall carry out feasible aquatic eco-
system restoration projects identified in the comprehensive
management plan for St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair,
Michigan, developed under section 426 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 326), at a
total Federal cost of not to exceed $5,000,000.
SEC. 5067. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for
emergency streambank protection in the vicinity of High-
way 2, Crookston, Minnesota, and, if the Secretary deter-
mines that the project is feasible, may carry out the
project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946
(33 U.S.C. 701r); except that the maximum amount of
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall
be $6,500,000.
SEC. 5068. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.
(a) PROJECT DESCRIPTION.—Section 219(f)(61) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat.
2763A–221) is amended—
234
(1) in the paragraph heading by striking
‘‘TOWNSHIP’’ and inserting ‘‘AND CROW WING AND
MILLE LACS COUNTIES’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘, Crow Wing County, Mille
Lacs County,’’ after ‘‘Garrison’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Such
assistance shall be provided directly to the Garrison-
Kathio-West Mille Lacs Lake Sanitary District,
Minnesota.’’.
(b) PROCEDURES.—In carrying out the project for
Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota, authorized by
such section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost
sharing and contracting procedures available to the Sec-
retary under section 569 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368).
SEC. 5069. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 569 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘Benton,
Sherburne,’’ and inserting ‘‘Beltrami, Hubbard,
Wadena,’’;
(2) by striking the last sentence of subsection
(e)(3)(B);
235
(3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(g) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
1962d–5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this sec-
tion, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit enti-
ty.’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(i) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Ten percent
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may
be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to ad-
minister projects under this section at 100 percent Fed-
eral expense.’’.
(b) BIWABIK, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary shall re-
imburse the non-Federal interest for the project for envi-
ronmental infrastructure, Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out
under section 569 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368–369), for planning, design,
and construction costs that were incurred by the non-Fed-
eral interest with respect to the project before the date
of the partnership agreement for the project and that were
in excess of the non-Federal share of the cost of the
project if the Secretary determines that the costs are ap-
propriate.
236
SEC. 5070. DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.
Section 219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220)
is amended by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$30,000,000’’.
SEC. 5071. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES,
MISSISSIPPI.
In carrying out projects for the protection, restora-
tion, and creation of aquatic and ecologically related habi-
tats located in Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties,
Mississippi, under section 204 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary
shall accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the
cost of the project in the form of services, materials, sup-
plies, and other in-kind contributions.
SEC. 5072. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI, AND ILLINOIS.
As a part of the operation and maintenance of the
project for the Mississippi River (Regulating Works), be-
tween the Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Missouri and Illinois,
authorized by the first section of an Act entitled ‘‘Making
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preserva-
tion of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and
for other purposes’’, approved June 25, 1910, the Sec-
retary may carry out activities necessary to restore and
protect fish and wildlife habitat in the middle Mississippi
River system. Such activities may include modification of
237
navigation training structures, modification and creation
of side channels, modification and creation of islands, and
studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive manage-
ment principles in design of future work.
SEC. 5073. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.
Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835–4836; 113 Stat. 337)
is amended by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$35,000,000’’.
SEC. 5074. DELAWARE RIVER, TRENTON, NEW JERSEY.
The Secretary shall provide assistance to address
floating and partially submerged debris in that portion of
the Delaware River downstream from Trenton, New Jer-
sey.
SEC. 5075. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JER-
SEY.
Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking ‘‘design’’ and inserting
‘‘planning, design,’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘Hackensack Meadowlands
Development’’ and all that follows through
‘‘Plan 
for’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘New 
Jersey
238
Meadowlands Commission for the development
of an environmental improvement program for’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in the subsection heading by striking
‘‘REQUIRED’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘shall’’ and inserting
‘‘may’’;
(C) by striking paragraph (1) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant
wetlands and aquatic habitat that contribute to the
Meadowlands ecosystem.’’;
(D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘and
aquatic habitat’’ before the period at the end;
and
(E) by striking paragraph (7) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(7) Research, development, and implementa-
tion for a water quality improvement program, in-
cluding restoration of hydrology and tidal flows and
remediation of hot spots and other sources of con-
taminants that degrade existing or planned sites.’’;
(3) in subsection (c) by inserting before the last
sentence the following: ‘‘The non-Federal sponsor
may also provide in-kind services, not to exceed 25
239
percent of the total project cost, and may also re-
ceive credit for reasonable cost of design work com-
pleted prior to entering into the partnership agree-
ment with the Secretary for a project to be carried
out under the program developed under subsection
(a).’’; and
(4) in subsection (d) by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’
and inserting ‘‘$35,000,000’’.
SEC. 5076. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.
(a) DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAM.—Section 404(a) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4863) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘processes’’ and inserting ‘‘and
related environmental processes’’;
(2) by inserting after ‘‘Atlantic Coast’’ the fol-
lowing: ‘‘(and associated back bays)’’;
(3) by inserting after ‘‘actions’’ the following: ‘‘,
environmental restoration or conservation measures
for coastal and back bays,’’; and
(4) by inserting at the end the following: ‘‘The
plan for collecting data and monitoring information
included in such annual report shall be fully coordi-
nated with and agreed to by appropriate agencies of
the State of New York.’’.
240
(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Section 404(b) of such Act
is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘INITIAL PLAN.—Not later than
12 months after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the’’ and inserting ‘‘ANNUAL REPORTS.—The’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘initial plan for data collection
and monitoring’’ and inserting ‘‘annual report of
data collection and monitoring activities’’; and
(3) by striking the last sentence.
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section
404(c) of such Act (113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking
‘‘and an additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years
thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘$2,500,000 for fiscal years
2000 through 2002, and $17,000,000 for fiscal years be-
ginning after September 30, 2002,’’.
SEC. 5077. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.
In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639–4640), the Sec-
retary shall give priority to work in College Point, New
York City, New York.
SEC. 5078. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY,
NEW YORK.
The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal
share of the cost of the project for ecosystem restoration,
Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York, the
241
cost of design and construction work carried out by the
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that
the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 5079. GATEWAY POINT, NORTH TONAWANDA, NEW
YORK.
The Secretary shall review the shoreline stabilization,
recreation, and public access components of the feasibility
report for waterfront development at Gateway Point,
North Tonawanda, New York, entitled ‘‘City of North
Tonawanda, Gateway Point Feasibility’’, dated February
6, 2003, and prepared by the non-Federal interest and,
if the Secretary determines that those components meet
the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engi-
neers and that the components are feasible, may carry out
the components at a Federal cost not to exceed
$3,300,000.
SEC. 5080. LITTLE NECK BAY, VILLAGE OF KINGS POINT,
NEW YORK.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may carry out a
navigation project at Little Neck Bay (Hague Basin), Vil-
lage of Kings Point, New York, sufficient to permit the
safe operation of the vessel T/V Kings Pointer at all tide
levels.
242
(b) REIMBURSEMENT.—The Secretary shall seek re-
imbursement from the United States Merchant Marine
Academy for the cost of the project carried out under this
section.
SEC. 5081. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.
Section 573 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1999 (113 Stat. 372–373) is amended—
(1) in subsection (f) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’
and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’;
(2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as
subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(f) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
1962d–5b(b)), for any project carried out under this sec-
tion, a non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit enti-
ty, with the consent of the affected local government.’’.
SEC. 5082. TIMES BEACH DIKE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.
As part of operation and maintenance of the Buffalo
Harbor and Buffalo River navigation projects, the Sec-
retary may repair the Times Beach confined disposal facil-
ity dike, Buffalo, New York.
243
SEC. 5083. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH
CAROLINA.
The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the
calculations necessary to negotiate and execute a revised,
permanent contract for water supply storage at John H.
Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, among the Sec-
retary and the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the
city of Henderson, North Carolina.
SEC. 5084. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A–221) is amended by
inserting ‘‘water and’’ before ‘‘wastewater’’.
SEC. 5085. CENTRAL RIVERFRONT PARK, CINCINNATI,
OHIO.
If the Secretary is authorized to carry out a down-
town waterfront development project for the Central
Riverfront Park, Cincinnati, Ohio, the Secretary shall
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the
project the cost of—
(1) design and construction work undertaken by
the non-Federal interest before entering into a part-
nership agreement for the project with the Secretary
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral
to the project; and
(2) land, easements, rights-of-way, and reloca-
tions provided by the non-Federal interest.
244
SEC. 5086. PIEDMONT LAKE DAM, OHIO.
In reconstructing the road on the Piedmont Lake
Dam as part of the project for dam safety assurance, Pied-
mont Lake Dam, Ohio, being carried out under section
4 of the Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat.
1414–1415), the Secretary shall upgrade the condition of
the road to meet standards applicable to public use roads
in the State of Ohio. The incremental cost of upgrading
the road to meet such standards shall be a non-Federal
expense.
SEC. 5087. OHIO.
Section 594(g) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383) is amended by striking
‘‘$60,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000’’.
SEC. 5088. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.
The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project
Master Conservancy District payable to the United States
Government in the amounts, rates of interest, and pay-
ment schedules is set at the amounts, rates of interest,
and payment schedules that existed, and that both parties
agreed to, on June 3, 1986, and may not be adjusted,
altered, or changed without a specific, separate, and writ-
ten agreement between the District and the United States
Government.
245
SEC. 5089. COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON.
Section 401(b)(3) of Public Law 100–581 (102 Stat.
2944), is amended by inserting ‘‘and Celilo Village, Or-
egon’’ after ‘‘existing sites’’.
SEC. 5090. EUGENE, OREGON.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study to determine the feasibility of restoring the millrace
in Eugene, Oregon, and, if the Secretary determines that
the restoration is feasible, shall carry out the restoration.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF NONECONOMIC BENEFITS.—
In determining the feasibility of restoring the millrace, the
Secretary shall include noneconomic benefits associated
with the historical significance of the millrace and associ-
ated with preservation and enhancement of resources.
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$20,000,000.
SEC. 5091. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE UMATILLA, OR-
EGON AND WASHINGTON.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall pay up to
$2,500,000 to the provider of research and curation sup-
port previously provided to the Federal Government as a
result of the multipurpose project, John Day Lock and
Dam, Lake Umatilla, Oregon and Washington, authorized
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64
Stat. 167), and the several navigation and flood damage
246
reduction projects constructed on the Columbia River and
Lower Willamette River, Oregon and Washington.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$2,500,000.
SEC. 5092. LOWELL, OREGON.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may convey with-
out consideration to Lowell School District, by quitclaim
deed, all right, title and interest of the United States in
and to approximately 3.32 acres of land and buildings
thereon, known as Tract A–82, located in Lowell, Oregon,
and described in subsection (b).
(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The parcel of land
authorized to be conveyed under subsection (a) is as fol-
lows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the west
line of Pioneer Street with the westerly extension of the
north line of Summit Street, in Meadows Addition to Low-
ell, as platted and recorded at page 56 of Volume 4, Lane
County Oregon Plat Records; thence north on the west
line of Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to the true
point of beginning of this description; thence north on the
west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence
west at right angles to the west line of Pioneer Street a
distance of 250.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the
west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence
247
east 250.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this de-
scription in Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 1 West
of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon.
(c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Before conveying the
parcel to the school district, the Secretary shall ensure
that the conditions of buildings and facilities meet the re-
quirements of applicable Federal law.
(d) GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.—
(1) APPLICABILITY OF PROPERTY SCREENING
PROVISIONS.—Section 2696 of title 10, United
States Code, shall not apply to any conveyance
under this section.
(2) LIABILITY.—An entity to which a convey-
ance is made under this section shall hold the
United States harmless from any liability with re-
spect to activities carried out, on or after the date
of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed.
The United States shall remain responsible for any
liability with respect to activities carried out, before
such date, on the real property conveyed.
SEC. 5093. HAGERMAN’S RUN, WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYL-
VANIA.
The Secretary may rehabilitate the pumps at the
project for flood damage reduction, Hagerman’s Run, Wil-
248
liamsport, Pennsylvania, at a total Federal cost of
$225,000.
SEC. 5094. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.
Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking
‘‘and Monroe’’ and inserting ‘‘Northumberland, Union,
Snyder, and Montour’’.
SEC. 5095. SUSQUEHANNOCK CAMPGROUND ACCESS ROAD,
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.
(a) IMPROVEMENT
OF ACCESS ROAD.—The Sec-
retary may make improvements to the Susquehannock
Campground access road at Raystown Lake, Pennsyl-
vania.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$500,000.
SEC. 5096. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYL-
VANIA AND NEW YORK.
Section 567 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787–3788; 114 Stat. 2662–2663) is
amended—
(1) 
in 
subsection 
(a)(2) 
by 
striking
‘‘$10,000,000.’’ 
and 
inserting 
the 
following:
‘‘$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may utilize
not more than $5,000,000 to design and construct
249
feasible pilot projects during the development of the
strategy to demonstrate alternative approaches for
the strategy. The total cost for any single pilot
project may not exceed $500,000. The Secretary
shall evaluate the results of the pilot projects and
consider the results in the development of the strat-
egy.’’;
(2) in subsection (c)—
(A) in the subsection heading by striking
‘‘COOPERATION’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘COOPERA-
TIVE’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘cooperation’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘cooperative’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the
non-Federal share of the cost of the project (i) the cost
of design and construction work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agree-
ment for the project if the Secretary determines that the
work is integral to the project; and (ii) the cost of in-kind
services and materials provided for the project by the non-
Federal interest.’’.
250
SEC. 5097. WASHINGTON, GREENE, WESTMORELAND, AND
FAYETTE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.
Section 219(f)(70) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A–221) is amended by
striking ‘‘$8,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$13,300,000’’.
SEC. 5098. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.
The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the
non-Federal interest concerning flood protection and envi-
ronmental restoration for Cano Martin Pena, San Juan,
Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary determines that the re-
port meets the evaluation and design standards of the
Corps of Engineers and that the project is feasible, may
carry out the project, at a total cost of $130,000,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $85,000,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $45,000,000.
SEC. 5099. BEAUFORT AND JASPER COUNTIES, SOUTH
CAROLINA.
The Secretary may accept from the Department of
the Navy, and may use, not to exceed $23,000,000 to as-
sist the Beaufort Jasper Water and Sewage Authority,
South Carolina, with its plan to consolidate civilian and
military wastewater treatment facilities.
SEC. 5100. COOPER RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to
provide technical and financial assistance for the removal
251
of the Grace and Pearman Bridges over the Cooper River,
South Carolina.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.—There is
authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this
section.
SEC. 5101. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.
Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220)
is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$35,000,000’’; and
(2) by inserting ‘‘wastewater treatment and’’
before ‘‘water supply’’.
SEC. 5102. UPPER BIG SIOUX RIVER, WATERTOWN, SOUTH
DAKOTA.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall review the
project for flood damage reduction, Upper Big Sioux River
basin, Watertown, South Dakota, as described in the re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated August 31, 1994,
and entitled ‘‘Watertown and Vicinity, South Dakota’’
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is fea-
sible, may carry out the project, at a total cost of
$25,000,000.
(b) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—
252
(1) IN GENERAL.—The non-Federal share of
the cost of the review may be provided in the form
of in-kind services and materials.
(2) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward
the non-Federal share of the cost of the review the
cost of planning and design work carried out by the
non-Federal interest before the date of an agreement
for the review if the Secretary determines that such
work is integral to the review.
SEC. 5103. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.
The Secretary shall—
(1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agri-
cultural Spur Levee, Tennessee, to determine the ex-
tent of levee modifications that would be required to
make the levee and associated drainage structures
consistent with Federal standards;
(2) design and construct such modifications;
and
(3) after completion of such modifications, in-
corporate the levee into the project for flood control,
Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the
Act entitled ‘‘An Act for the control of floods on the
Mississippi River and its tributaries, and for other
purposes’’, approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534–