section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a): 
(1) BALLONA CREEK, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—Project for improvement of the qual-
ity of the environment, Ballona Creek, Los Angeles 
County, California. 
(2) BALLONA
LAGOON
TIDE
GATES, MARINA 
DEL REY, CALIFORNIA.—Project for improvement of 
the quality of the environment, Ballona Lagoon Tide 
Gates, Marina Del Rey, California. 
(3) FT. GEORGE INLET, DUVAL COUNTY, FLOR-
IDA.—Project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Ft. George Inlet, Duval County, Flor-
ida. 
(4) RATHBUN
LAKE, IOWA.—Project for im-
provement of the quality of the environment, 
Rathbun Lake, Iowa. 
(5) SMITHVILLE LAKE, MISSOURI.—Project for 
improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Smithville Lake, Missouri. 
(6) DELAWARE BAY, NEW JERSEY AND DELA-
WARE.—Project for improvement of the quality of 
the environment, Delaware Bay, New Jersey and 
Delaware, for the purpose of oyster restoration.
(7) TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PENNSYLVANIA.—
Project for improvement of the quality of the envi-
ronment, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania. 
SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM 
RESTORATION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that 
a project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330): 
(1) CYPRESS
CREEK, 
MONTGOMERY, 
ALA-
BAMA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama. 
(2) BLACK LAKE, ALASKA.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the 
head of the Chignik watershed. 
(3) ALISO
CREEK, CALIFORNIA.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Aliso Creek, Cali-
fornia. 
(4) BEN
LOMOND
DAM, SANTA
CRUZ, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, California. 
(5) DOCKWEILER BLUFFS, LOS ANGELES COUN-
TY, CALIFORNIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles County, 
California. 
(6) SALT
RIVER, 
CALIFORNIA.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Salt River, California. 
(7) SANTA ROSA CREEK, SANTA ROSA, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Santa Rosa Creek in the vicinity of the Prince Me-
morial Greenway, Santa Rosa, California. 
(8) STOCKTON
DEEP
WATER
SHIP
CHANNEL 
AND
LOWER
SAN
JOAQUIN
RIVER, CALIFORNIA.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Stockton 
Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin 
River, California. 
(9) SWEETWATER
RESERVOIR, 
SAN
DIEGO 
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—Project for aquatic eco-
system restoration, Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego 
County, California, including efforts to address 
aquatic nuisance species. 
(10) BISCAYNE
BAY, FLORIDA.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key 
Biscayne, Florida. 
(11) CLAM
BAYOU
AND
DINKINS
BAYOU, 
SANIBEL
ISLAND, FLORIDA.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou and Dinkins 
Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
(12) CHATTAHOOCHEE
FALL
LINE, GEORGIA 
AND ALABAMA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and Ala-
bama. 
(13) LONGWOOD
COVE, GAINESVILLE, GEOR-
GIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Longwood Cove, Gainesville, Georgia. 
(14) LAKE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ryerson Forest Pre-
serve Dam, Dam 1A, Dam 1B, and Dam 1C, Lake 
County, Illinois. 
(15) CITY
PARK, UNIVERSITY
LAKES, LOU-
ISIANA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
City Park, University Lakes, Louisiana. 
(16) MILL
POND, 
LITTLETON, 
MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Mill Pond, Littleton, Massachusetts. 
(17) PINE TREE BROOK, MILTON, MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Pine Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts. 
(18) KALAMAZOO RIVER WATERSHED, BATTLE 
CREEK, MICHIGAN.—Project for aquatic ecosystem 
restoration, Kalamazoo River watershed, Battle 
Creek, Michigan.
(19) RUSH
LAKE, MINNESOTA.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Rush Lake, Min-
nesota. 
(20) SOUTH
FORK
OF
THE
CROW
RIVER, 
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA.—Project for aquatic eco-
system restoration, South Fork of the Crow River, 
Hutchinson, Minnesota. 
(21) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, St. Louis, Missouri. 
(22) TRUCKEE RIVER, RENO, NEVADA.—Project 
for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, 
Reno, Nevada, including features for fish passage 
for Washoe County. 
(23) GROVER’S
MILL
POND, NEW
JERSEY.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grover’s 
Mill Pond, New Jersey. 
(24) DUGWAY
CREEK, BRATENAHL, OHIO.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dugway 
Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio. 
(25) JOHNSON CREEK, GRESHAM, OREGON.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Johnson 
Creek, Gresham, Oregon. 
(26) BEAVER
CREEK, BEAVER
AND
SALEM, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, Pennsyl-
vania. 
(27) CEMENTON DAM, LEHIGH RIVER, PENN-
SYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restora-
tion, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, Pennsylvania. 
(28) SAUCON CREEK, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Saucon Creek, Northampton County, Penn-
sylvania. 
(29) BLACKSTONE
RIVER, RHODE
ISLAND.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Black-
stone River, Rhode Island. 
(30) WILSON BRANCH, CHERAW, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South Carolina. 
(31) WHITE
RIVER, 
BETHEL, 
VERMONT.—
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, White 
River, Bethel, Vermont. 
SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTEC-
TION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that 
a project is feasible, may carry out the project under sec-
tion 3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of pub-
licly owned property’’, approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426g): 
(1) NELSON
LAGOON, ALASKA.—Project for 
shoreline protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. 
(2) SANIBEL
ISLAND, FLORIDA.—Project for 
shoreline protection, Sanibel Island, Florida. 
(3) APRA HARBOR, GUAM.—Project for shore-
line protection, Apra Harbor, Guam. 
(4) PITI, CABRAS ISLAND, GUAM.—Project for 
shoreline protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam. 
(5) NARROWS
AND
GRAVESEND
BAY, UPPER 
NEW YORK BAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.—Project 
for shoreline protection in the vicinity of the con-
fluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper 
New York Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, 
New York. 
(6) DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL 
SHIPYARD, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for shoreline 
protection, Delaware River in the vicinity of the 
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania. 
(7) PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS.—Project for shore-
line protection, Port Aransas, Texas.
SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDI-
MENT REMOVAL. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following 
project and, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under 
section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 
(33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and clear-
ing and straightening of channels for flood control, 
Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, 
New York. 
TITLE II—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS. 
Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(n) NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.—
‘‘(1) PROHIBITION
ON
SOLICITATION
OF
EX-
CESS CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary may not—
‘‘(A) solicit contributions from non-Federal 
interests for costs of constructing authorized 
water resources projects or measures in excess 
of the non-Federal share assigned to the appro-
priate project purposes listed in subsections (a), 
(b), and (c); or