datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(6) technical assistance and training for inter-
operable emergency communications; and 
‘‘(7) other activities determined by the Sec-
retary to be integral to interoperable emergency 
communications. 
‘‘(c) REGION DEFINED.—For the purposes of this 
section, the term ‘region’ means any combination of con-
tiguous local government units, including such a combina-
tion established by law or mutual aid agreement between 
two or more local governments or governmental agen-
cies.’’. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Home-
land Security for grants under section 522 of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002, as added by subsection (a)— 
(1) such sums as may be necessary for the first 
fiscal year that begins after the later of— 
(A) the date on which the Secretary of 
Homeland Security completes and submits to 
Congress the National Emergency Communica-
tions Plan required under section 1802 of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 572); 
(B) the date on which the Secretary of 
Homeland Security completes and submits to 
Congress the first baseline interoperability as-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:55 Jan 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H338.IH
H338
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 848
AN ACT
To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applica-
ble to the construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric
Project in New York, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 849
AN ACT
To prohibit an alien who is not lawfully present in
the United States from receiving assistance
under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.
‘‘(B) GLACIER
CREEK
AND
LAKE.—5.2 
miles in the Chugach National Forest, Alaska, 
as depicted on the Alaska Rainforest Map, to be 
administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
a wild river. 
‘‘(C) CARMEN
RIVER
AND
LAKE.—3.0 
miles in the Chugach National Forest, Alaska, 
as depicted on the Alaska Rainforest Map, to be 
administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
a wild river.’’. 
SEC. 602. DESIGNATION OF RIVERS WITHIN CHUGACH NA-
TIONAL FOREST FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL 
ADDITION TO THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS 
SYSTEM. 
Section 5 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1276) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subsection: 
‘‘(e) CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST, ALASKA.—The 
map referred to in paragraphs (1) through (6) means the 
Alaska Rainforest Map, as defined in section 3 of the Alas-
ka Rainforest Conservation Act of 2005. 
‘‘(1) GRAVINA RIVER.—17.0 miles in the Chu-
gach National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on the 
Alaska Rainforest Map, to be administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture as a study river.
‘‘(2) RESURRECTION CREEK.—14.8 miles in the 
Chugach National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on the 
Alaska Rainforest Map, to be administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture as a study river. 
‘‘(3) RESURRECTION RIVER.—22.0 miles in the 
Chugach National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on the 
Alaska Rainforest Map, to be administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture as a study river. 
‘‘(4) INGRAM CREEK.—5.0 miles in the Chu-
gach National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on the 
Alaska Rainforest Map, to be administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture as a study river. 
‘‘(5) MILLS CREEK.—10.0 miles in the Chugach 
National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on the Alaska 
Rainforest Map, to be administered by the Secretary 
of Agriculture as a study river. 
‘‘(6) SOUTH FORK SNOW RIVER.—12.0 miles in 
the Chugach National Forest, Alaska, as depicted on 
the Alaska Rainforest Map, to be administered by 
the Secretary of Agriculture as a study river.’’. 
SEC. 603. WITHDRAWAL. 
Notwithstanding section 9(b) of the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1280(b)), all public lands that con-
stitute the bed or bank, or are within an area extending 
one mile from the bank of the river channel on both sides
IV 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 375 
Expressing the sense of Congress to support the decision of the United 
States Court of Federal Claims to award public safety officer death 
benefits to the family of Christopher Nicholas Kangas, a 14-year old 
volunteer apprentice firefighter who died as a result of serious injuries 
sustained en route to assist in fighting a fire. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 30, 2006 
Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of Congress to support the decision 
of the United States Court of Federal Claims to award 
public safety officer death benefits to the family of Chris-
topher Nicholas Kangas, a 14-year old volunteer appren-
tice firefighter who died as a result of serious injuries 
sustained en route to assist in fighting a fire. 
Whereas the intent of Congress when establishing the Public 
Safety Officers’ Benefits program was to extend benefits 
to individuals who risk their lives for the benefit of the 
public, regardless of age; and 
Whereas Christopher Nicholas Kangas sacrificed his young 
life while en route to fight a fire, his family was initially 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:50 Mar 31, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC375.IH
HC375
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
•HCON 375 IH 
denied Public Safety Death Benefits due to his ineligi-
bility to qualify as a firefighter: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That the Congress supports the decision of 
the United States Court of Federal Claims (No. 05– 
697C), March 27, 2008, to grant Public Safety Officers 
Benefits to the family of Christopher Nicholas Kangas, a 
14-year old volunteer apprentice firefighter who died as 
a result of serious injuries sustained en route to assist in 
fighting a fire. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:50 Mar 31, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC375.IH
HC375
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 106
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 856
[Report No. 105–131, Part I]
A BILL
To provide a process leading to full self-government
for Puerto Rico.
JULY 11, 1997
The Committee on Rules discharged; referred to the
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the
Union and ordered to be printed
earlier detection of illnesses, often before symptoms 
have begun. Genetic testing can allow individuals to 
take steps to reduce the likelihood that they will con-
tract a particular disorder. New knowledge about ge-
netics may allow for the development of better thera-
pies that are more effective against disease or have 
fewer side effects than current treatments. These 
advances give rise to the potential misuse of genetic 
information to discriminate in health insurance and 
employment. 
(2) The early science of genetics became the 
basis of State laws that provided for the sterilization 
of persons having presumed genetic ‘‘defects’’ such 
as mental retardation, mental disease, epilepsy, 
blindness, and hearing loss, among other conditions. 
The first sterilization law was enacted in the State 
of Indiana in 1907. By 1981, a majority of States 
adopted sterilization laws to ‘‘correct’’ apparent ge-
netic traits or tendencies. Many of these State laws 
have since been repealed, and many have been modi-
fied to include essential constitutional requirements 
of due process and equal protection. However, the 
current explosion in the science of genetics, and the 
history of sterilization laws by the States based on
H. Res. 1174 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
May 7, 2008. 
Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this res-
olution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 
XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 5818) to authorize the Secretary of Housing 
and Urban Development to make loans to States to acquire 
foreclosed housing and to make grants to States for related 
costs. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived ex-
cept those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 
Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order 
to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of 
a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial
Calendar No. 66
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 867
AN ACT
To promote the adoption of children in foster care.
JUNE 3, 1997
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Union Calendar No. 52
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 867
[Report No. 105–77]
A BILL
To promote the adoption of children in foster care.
APRIL 28, 1997
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commit-
tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
ordered to be printed
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 872
AN ACT
To establish rules governing product liability ac-
tions against raw materials and bulk component
suppliers to medical device manufacturers, and
for other purposes.
sessment required under section 1803 of such 
Act (6 U.S.C. 573); or 
(C) the date on which the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, after consultation with the 
Director of Emergency Communications, deter-
mines and notifies Congress that substantial 
progress has been made towards the develop-
ment and promulgation of voluntary consensus- 
based interoperable communications standards 
pursuant to section 1801(c)(11) of such Act (6 
U.S.C. 571(c)(11)); and 
(2) such sums as may be necessary for each 
subsequent fiscal year. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of that Act is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 521 the following: 
‘‘Sec. 522. Improve Communications for Emergency Response Grant Pro-
gram.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:55 Jan 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H338.IH
H338
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
a wild river. 
‘‘(17) LACE RIVER.—Approximately 20 miles of 
river within VCU 13 of the Tongass National For-
est, from the Meade Glacier to Berners Bay, to be 
administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as a 
wild river. 
‘‘(18) LONG
BAY
RIVER.—Approximately 7 
miles of river within VCU 228 of the Tongass Na-
tional Forest, from its headwaters in the Moore 
Mtns. to Long Bay, to be administered by the Sec-
retary of Agriculture as a wild river. 
‘‘(19) PORT
HOUGHTON
RIVER
AND
SALT 
CHUCK.—Approximately 12 miles of river within 
VCU 78 and 79 of the Tongass National Forest, 
from an unnamed lake at the base of the Coastal 
Mtns. to the salt chuck, to be administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture as a wild river. 
‘‘(20) ST. JAMES BAY CREEK.—Approximately 
5 miles of river within VCU 106 and 110 of the 
Tongass National Forest, from its headwaters in the 
Chilkat Range to the boundary of the St. James Bay 
Marine State Park, to be administered by the Sec-
retary of Agriculture as a wild river.
‘‘(21) SANBORN CREEK AND CANAL.—Approxi-
mately 6.5 miles of river and estuary within VCU 84 
of the Tongass National Forest, from its headwaters 
to Port Houghton, to be administered by the Sec-
retary of Agriculture as a wild river. 
‘‘(22) 
SEAL
BAY
RIVER
(ALL
THREE 
BRANCHES).—Approximately 7 miles of river within 
VCU 229 of the Tongass National Forest, from its 
headwaters to Tenakee Inlet, to be administered by 
the Secretary of Agriculture as a wild river. 
‘‘(23) SEA
LION
COVE
CREEKS
(NORTH
AND 
SOUTH
FORKS).—Approximately 4 miles of river 
within VCU 305 of the Tongass National Forest, 
from its headwaters to Sea Lion Cove, to be admin-
istered by the Secretary of Agriculture as a wild 
river. 
‘‘(24) SITKOH CREEK.—Approximately 4 miles 
of river within VCU 244 of the Tongass National 
Forest, from Sitkoh Lake to Sitkoh Bay, to be ad-
ministered by the Secretary of Agriculture as a sce-
nic river. 
‘‘(25) SOUTH SULLIVAN RIVER.—Approximately 
9 miles of river within VCU 98 of the Tongass Na-
tional Forest, from its headwaters to saltwater, to be
early genetic science, compels Congressional action 
in this area. 
(3) Although genes are facially neutral markers, 
many genetic conditions and disorders are associated 
with particular racial and ethnic groups and gender. 
Because some genetic traits are most prevalent in 
particular groups, members of a particular group 
may be stigmatized or discriminated against as a re-
sult of that genetic information. This form of dis-
crimination was evident in the 1970s, which saw the 
advent of programs to screen and identify carriers of 
sickle cell anemia, a disease which afflicts African- 
Americans. Once again, State legislatures began to 
enact discriminatory laws in the area, and in the 
early 1970s began mandating genetic screening of 
all African Americans for sickle cell anemia, leading 
to discrimination and unnecessary fear. To alleviate 
some of this stigma, Congress in 1972 passed the 
National Sickle Cell Anemia Control Act, which 
withholds Federal funding from States unless sickle 
cell testing is voluntary. 
(4) Congress has been informed of examples of 
genetic discrimination in the workplace. These in-
clude the use of pre-employment genetic screening at 
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, which led to a court
IV 
House Calendar No. 214 
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 1174 
[Report No. 110–621] 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5818) to authorize the Secretary 
of Housing and Urban Development to make loans to States to acquire 
foreclosed housing and to make grants to States for related costs. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 6, 2008 
Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 
which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 
RESOLUTION 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5818) to author-
ize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 
to make loans to States to acquire foreclosed housing 
and to make grants to States for related costs. 
Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 
rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 
of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider-
ation of the bill (H.R. 5818) to authorize the Secretary 
of Housing and Urban Development to make loans to 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:34 May 07, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR1174.RH
HR1174
erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$34,206,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $33,410,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$34,178,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $33,275,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$33,869,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $33,093,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$34,293,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $32,717,000,000. 
(3) General Science, Space, and Technology 
(250): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$25,938,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $25,108,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$27,146,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
(B) Outlays, $26,083,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$28,193,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $27,135,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$29,410,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $28,263,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$30,689,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $29,483,000,000. 
(4) Energy (270): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$2,262,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $915,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$2,688,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $703,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$2,317,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
(B) Outlays, $913,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$2,190,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $867,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$2,094,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $711,000,000. 
(5) Natural Resources and Environment (300): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$29,650,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $33,038,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$28,833,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $30,756,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$29,238,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $30,285,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$28,687,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
(B) Outlays, $29,724,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$28,595,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $29,313,000,000. 
(6) Agriculture (350): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$27,356,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $26,782,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$25,205,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $24,564,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$24,512,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $23,829,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$23,370,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $22,560,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$23,011,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
decision in favor of the employees in that case Nor-
man-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 
(135 F.3d 1260, 1269 (9th Cir. 1998)). Congress 
clearly has a compelling public interest in relieving 
the fear of discrimination and in prohibiting its ac-
tual practice in employment and health insurance. 
(5) Federal law addressing genetic discrimina-
tion in health insurance and employment is incom-
plete in both the scope and depth of its protections. 
Moreover, while many States have enacted some type 
of genetic non-discrimination law, these laws vary 
widely with respect to their approach, application, 
and level of protection. Congress has collected sub-
stantial evidence that the American public and the 
medical community find the existing patchwork of 
State and Federal laws to be confusing and inad-
equate to protect them from discrimination. There-
fore Federal legislation establishing a national and 
uniform basic standard is necessary to fully protect 
the public from discrimination and allay their con-
cerns about the potential for discrimination, thereby 
allowing individuals to take advantage of genetic 
testing, technologies, research, and new therapies.
•HCON 376 RH 
(B) Outlays, $22,281,000,000. 
(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$16,518,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $8,049,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$13,178,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $7,997,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$13,278,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $7,987,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$17,062,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $8,857,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$11,866,000,000 
(B) Outlays, $5,390,000,000. 
(8) Transportation (400): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$78,258,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $75,774,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$81,283,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $78,557,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$72,878,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $78,329,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$72,926,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $77,828,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$73,477,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $77,833,000,000. 
(9) Community and Regional Development 
(450): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$15,942,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $31,345,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$12,917,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $25,443,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$12,981,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $21,661,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$12,988,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $17,777,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$13,218,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $13,680,000,000. 
(10) Education, Training, Employment, and 
Social Services (500): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$84,849,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $87,530,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$84,140,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
•HCON 376 RH 
(B) Outlays, $85,316,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$83,989,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $83,273,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2010: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$83,393,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $82,575,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2011: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$83,343,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $82,597,000,000. 
(11) Health (550): 
Fiscal year 2007: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$275,750,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $274,299,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2008: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$289,867,000,000. 
(B) Outlays, $290,959,000,000. 
Fiscal year 2009: 
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority, 
$310,193,000,000. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:51 Apr 01, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC376.RH
HC376
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
TITLE 
I—GENETIC 
NON-
DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH 
INSURANCE 
SEC. 101. AMENDMENTS TO EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT IN-
COME SECURITY ACT OF 1974. 
(a) PROHIBITION OF HEALTH DISCRIMINATION ON 
THE BASIS
OF GENETIC INFORMATION
OR GENETIC 
SERVICES.— 
(1) NO
ENROLLMENT
RESTRICTION
FOR
GE-
NETIC SERVICES.—Section 702(a)(1)(F) of the Em-
ployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(1)(F)) is amended by inserting be-
fore the period the following: ‘‘(including informa-
tion about a request for or receipt of genetic services 
by an individual or family member of such indi-
vidual)’’. 
(2) NO DISCRIMINATION IN GROUP PREMIUMS 
BASED ON GENETIC INFORMATION.—Section 702(b) 
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (29 U.S.C. 1182(b)) is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting be-
fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘except as pro-
vided in paragraph (3)’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following: