I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 5 
To improve patient access to health care services and provide improved 
medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places 
on the health care delivery system. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 21, 2005 
Mr. GINGREY (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addi-
tion to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be sub-
sequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 
such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To improve patient access to health care services and provide 
improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden 
the liability system places on the health care delivery 
system. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Efficient, Acces-
sible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 
2005’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.— 
(1) EFFECT
ON
HEALTH
CARE
ACCESS
AND 
COSTS.—Congress finds that our current civil justice 
system is adversely affecting patient access to health 
care services, better patient care, and cost-efficient 
health care, in that the health care liability system 
is a costly and ineffective mechanism for resolving 
claims of health care liability and compensating in-
jured patients, and is a deterrent to the sharing of 
information among health care professionals which 
impedes efforts to improve patient safety and quality 
of care. 
(2) EFFECT
ON
INTERSTATE
COMMERCE.— 
Congress finds that the health care and insurance 
industries are industries affecting interstate com-
merce and the health care liability litigation systems 
existing throughout the United States are activities 
that affect interstate commerce by contributing to 
the high costs of health care and premiums for 
health care liability insurance purchased by health 
care system providers. 
(3) EFFECT
ON
FEDERAL
SPENDING.—Con-
gress finds that the health care liability litigation 
systems existing throughout the United States have
a significant effect on the amount, distribution, and 
use of Federal funds because of— 
(A) the large number of individuals who 
receive health care benefits under programs op-
erated or financed by the Federal Government; 
(B) the large number of individuals who 
benefit because of the exclusion from Federal 
taxes of the amounts spent to provide them 
with health insurance benefits; and 
(C) the large number of health care pro-
viders who provide items or services for which 
the Federal Government makes payments. 
(b) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this Act to imple-
ment reasonable, comprehensive, and effective health care 
liability reforms designed to— 
(1) improve the availability of health care serv-
ices in cases in which health care liability actions 
have been shown to be a factor in the decreased 
availability of services; 
(2) reduce the incidence of ‘‘defensive medi-
cine’’ and lower the cost of health care liability in-
surance, all of which contribute to the escalation of 
health care costs; 
(3) ensure that persons with meritorious health 
care injury claims receive fair and adequate com-
pensation, including reasonable noneconomic dam-
ages; 
(4) improve the fairness and cost-effectiveness 
of our current health care liability system to resolve 
disputes over, and provide compensation for, health 
care liability by reducing uncertainty in the amount 
of compensation provided to injured individuals; and 
(5) provide an increased sharing of information 
in the health care system which will reduce unin-
tended injury and improve patient care. 
SEC. 3. ENCOURAGING SPEEDY RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. 
The time for the commencement of a health care law-
suit shall be 3 years after the date of manifestation of 
injury or 1 year after the claimant discovers, or through 
the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the 
injury, whichever occurs first. In no event shall the time 
for commencement of a health care lawsuit exceed 3 years 
after the date of manifestation of injury unless tolled for 
any of the following— 
(1) upon proof of fraud; 
(2) intentional concealment; or 
(3) the presence of a foreign body, which has no 
therapeutic or diagnostic purpose or effect, in the 
person of the injured person.
Actions by a minor shall be commenced within 3 years 
from the date of the alleged manifestation of injury except 
that actions by a minor under the full age of 6 years shall 
be commenced within 3 years of manifestation of injury 
or prior to the minor’s 8th birthday, whichever provides 
a longer period. Such time limitation shall be tolled for 
minors for any period during which a parent or guardian 
and a health care provider or health care organization 
have committed fraud or collusion in the failure to bring 
an action on behalf of the injured minor. 
SEC. 4. COMPENSATING PATIENT INJURY. 
(a) UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF DAMAGES FOR ACTUAL 
ECONOMIC LOSSES IN HEALTH CARE LAWSUITS.—In any 
health care lawsuit, nothing in this Act shall limit a claim-
ant’s recovery of the full amount of the available economic 
damages, notwithstanding the limitation in subsection (b). 
(b) ADDITIONAL NONECONOMIC DAMAGES.—In any 
health care lawsuit, the amount of noneconomic damages, 
if available, may be as much as $250,000, regardless of 
the number of parties against whom the action is brought 
or the number of separate claims or actions brought with 
respect to the same injury. 
(c) NO DISCOUNT OF AWARD FOR NONECONOMIC 
DAMAGES.—For purposes of applying the limitation in 
subsection (b), future noneconomic damages shall not be
discounted to present value. The jury shall not be in-
formed about the maximum award for noneconomic dam-
ages. An award for noneconomic damages in excess of 
$250,000 shall be reduced either before the entry of judg-
ment, or by amendment of the judgment after entry of 
judgment, and such reduction shall be made before ac-
counting for any other reduction in damages required by 
law. If separate awards are rendered for past and future 
noneconomic damages and the combined awards exceed 
$250,000, the future noneconomic damages shall be re-
duced first. 
(d) FAIR SHARE RULE.—In any health care lawsuit, 
each party shall be liable for that party’s several share 
of any damages only and not for the share of any other 
person. Each party shall be liable only for the amount of 
damages allocated to such party in direct proportion to 
such party’s percentage of responsibility. Whenever a 
judgment of liability is rendered as to any party, a sepa-
rate judgment shall be rendered against each such party 
for the amount allocated to such party. For purposes of 
this section, the trier of fact shall determine the propor-
tion of responsibility of each party for the claimant’s 
harm.
SEC. 5. MAXIMIZING PATIENT RECOVERY. 
(a) COURT SUPERVISION OF SHARE OF DAMAGES 
ACTUALLY PAID TO CLAIMANTS.—In any health care law-
suit, the court shall supervise the arrangements for pay-
ment of damages to protect against conflicts of interest 
that may have the effect of reducing the amount of dam-
ages awarded that are actually paid to claimants. In par-
ticular, in any health care lawsuit in which the attorney 
for a party claims a financial stake in the outcome by vir-
tue of a contingent fee, the court shall have the power 
to restrict the payment of a claimant’s damage recovery 
to such attorney, and to redirect such damages to the 
claimant based upon the interests of justice and principles 
of equity. In no event shall the total of all contingent fees 
for representing all claimants in a health care lawsuit ex-
ceed the following limits: 
(1) 40 percent of the first $50,000 recovered by 
the claimant(s). 
(2) 331⁄3 percent of the next $50,000 recovered 
by the claimant(s). 
(3) 25 percent of the next $500,000 recovered 
by the claimant(s). 
(4) 15 percent of any amount by which the re-
covery by the claimant(s) is in excess of $600,000. 
(b) APPLICABILITY.—The limitations in this section 
shall apply whether the recovery is by judgment, settle-
ment, mediation, arbitration, or any other form of alter-
native dispute resolution. In a health care lawsuit involv-
ing a minor or incompetent person, a court retains the 
authority to authorize or approve a fee that is less than 
the maximum permitted under this section. The require-
ment for court supervision in the first two sentences of 
subsection (a) applies only in civil actions. 
SEC. 6. ADDITIONAL HEALTH BENEFITS. 
In any health care lawsuit involving injury or wrong-
ful death, any party may introduce evidence of collateral 
source benefits. If a party elects to introduce such evi-
dence, any opposing party may introduce evidence of any 
amount paid or contributed or reasonably likely to be paid 
or contributed in the future by or on behalf of the oppos-
ing party to secure the right to such collateral source bene-
fits. No provider of collateral source benefits shall recover 
any amount against the claimant or receive any lien or 
credit against the claimant’s recovery or be equitably or 
legally subrogated to the right of the claimant in a health 
care lawsuit involving injury or wrongful death. This sec-
tion shall apply to any health care lawsuit that is settled 
as well as a health care lawsuit that is resolved by a fact 
finder. This section shall not apply to section 1862(b) (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(b)) or section 1902(a)(25) (42 U.S.C. 
1396a(a)(25)) of the Social Security Act.
SEC. 7. PUNITIVE DAMAGES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Punitive damages may, if other-
wise permitted by applicable State or Federal law, be 
awarded against any person in a health care lawsuit only 
if it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that such 
person acted with malicious intent to injure the claimant, 
or that such person deliberately failed to avoid unneces-
sary injury that such person knew the claimant was sub-
stantially certain to suffer. In any health care lawsuit 
where no judgment for compensatory damages is rendered 
against such person, no punitive damages may be awarded 
with respect to the claim in such lawsuit. No demand for 
punitive damages shall be included in a health care lawsuit 
as initially filed. A court may allow a claimant to file an 
amended pleading for punitive damages only upon a mo-
tion by the claimant and after a finding by the court, upon 
review of supporting and opposing affidavits or after a 
hearing, after weighing the evidence, that the claimant has 
established by a substantial probability that the claimant 
will prevail on the claim for punitive damages. At the re-
quest of any party in a health care lawsuit, the trier of 
fact shall consider in a separate proceeding— 
(1) whether punitive damages are to be award-
ed and the amount of such award; and 
(2) the amount of punitive damages following a 
determination of punitive liability.
If a separate proceeding is requested, evidence relevant 
only to the claim for punitive damages, as determined by 
applicable State law, shall be inadmissible in any pro-
ceeding to determine whether compensatory damages are 
to be awarded. 
(b) DETERMINING AMOUNT
OF PUNITIVE DAM-
AGES.— 
(1) FACTORS
CONSIDERED.—In determining 
the amount of punitive damages, if awarded, in a 
health care lawsuit, the trier of fact shall consider 
only the following— 
(A) the severity of the harm caused by the 
conduct of such party; 
(B) the duration of the conduct or any 
concealment of it by such party; 
(C) the profitability of the conduct to such 
party; 
(D) the number of products sold or med-
ical procedures rendered for compensation, as 
the case may be, by such party, of the kind 
causing the harm complained of by the claim-
ant; 
(E) any criminal penalties imposed on such 
party, as a result of the conduct complained of 
by the claimant; and
(F) the amount of any civil fines assessed 
against such party as a result of the conduct 
complained of by the claimant. 
(2) MAXIMUM AWARD.—The amount of punitive 
damages, if awarded, in a health care lawsuit may 
be as much as $250,000 or as much as two times 
the amount of economic damages awarded, which-
ever is greater. The jury shall not be informed of 
this limitation. 
(c) NO PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR PRODUCTS THAT 
COMPLY WITH FDA STANDARDS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.— 
(A) No punitive damages may be awarded 
against the manufacturer or distributor of a 
medical product, or a supplier of any compo-
nent or raw material of such medical product, 
based on a claim that such product caused the 
claimant’s harm where— 
(i)(I) such medical product was sub-
ject to premarket approval, clearance, or li-
censure by the Food and Drug Administra-
tion with respect to the safety of the for-
mulation or performance of the aspect of 
such medical product which caused the 
claimant’s harm or the adequacy of the