datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 585 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an Interstate 
73 corridor transportation compact. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 13, 2016 
Mr. HURT of Virginia (for himself, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. GRIF-
FITH, Mrs. COMSTOCK, and Mr. RICE of South Carolina) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judi-
ciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 
case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
the committee concerned 
RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 
regarding an Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact. 
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep-
resentatives that the entering into of an agreement or 
compact by 2 or more States, for cooperative effort and 
mutual assistance, would be beneficial to the development 
of an Interstate 73 corridor. Such an agreement may in-
corporate the following elements to the extent that such 
elements are consistent with Federal law and specifically 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR585.IH
HR585
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 585 IH 
section 1105(c)(5) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991: 
(1) Study, development, and promotion of a 
plan for the design, construction, financing, and op-
eration of the Interstate 73 corridor through the 
States of South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, 
West Virginia, Ohio, and Michigan. 
(2) Coordination of efforts to establish a com-
mon legal framework in all the signatory States to 
authorize and facilitate design, construction, financ-
ing, and operation of the Interstate 73 corridor or 
through public-private partnerships. 
(3) Advocacy for Federal funding to support 
the establishment of the Interstate 73 corridor. 
(4) Making available to the Interstate 73 cor-
ridor project funding and resources that are or may 
be appropriated by the signatory States and allo-
cated for that purpose. 
(5) Doing all things necessary or convenient to 
facilitate and coordinate the design, construction, fi-
nancing, and operation of the Interstate 73 corridor 
to the extent that such plans and programs are con-
sistent with Federal law and the laws of the signa-
tory States. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR585.IH
HR585
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4582
To provide that in determining the income of beneficiaries for purposes
of the so-called minimum-income widows program for certain surviving
spouses of military retirees, the Secretary of Defense shall exclude
monthly insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 16, 1998
Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on National Security
A BILL
To provide that in determining the income of beneficiaries
for purposes of the so-called minimum-income widows
program for certain surviving spouses of military retirees,
the Secretary of Defense shall exclude monthly insurance
benefits under title II of the Social Security Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
FROM INCOME CONSIDERED FOR PURPOSES
OF MINIMUM-INCOME WIDOWS PROGRAM.
(a) INCOME DETERMINATION.—Section 4 of Public
Law 92–425 (10 U.S.C. 1448 note) is amended by adding
at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(f) For purposes of subsections (a)(3) and (b), the
income of a person shall be determined without regard to
any amount of monthly insurance benefits received by that
person under title II of the Social Security Act.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments under
Section 4 of Public Law 92–425 for months after Septem-
ber 1998.
Æ
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 586 
Expressing support for designation of the fourth week in May as ‘‘DIPG 
Awareness Week’’ to raise awareness and encourage the research into 
cures for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric cancers 
in general. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 13, 2016 
Mr. KNIGHT (for himself, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 
CHABOT, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. CA´RDENAS, and Mr. CONYERS) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce 
RESOLUTION 
Expressing support for designation of the fourth week in 
May as ‘‘DIPG Awareness Week’’ to raise awareness 
and encourage the research into cures for diffuse intrin-
sic pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric cancers in gen-
eral. 
Whereas diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) affects 200 
to 400 children in the United States each year; 
Whereas brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related 
death in children; 
Whereas DIPG is the second most common malignant brain 
tumor of childhood; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR586.IH
HR586
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 586 IH 
Whereas DIPG is the leading cause of childhood death due 
to brain tumors; 
Whereas the median survival is only 9 months; 
Whereas 5-year survival is less than 1 percent; 
Whereas given the age at diagnosis and the average life ex-
pectancy, the number of life years lost annually because 
of DIPG is approximately 25,000 years of person life lost 
(calculated as the number of children diagnosed by aver-
age of male and female life expectancy from that median 
age, 300 × 80 = 25,000 years of person life lost annu-
ally); and 
Whereas prognosis has not improved for children with DIPG 
in over 35 years: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
(1) supports the designation of ‘‘DIPG Aware-
ness Week’’; 
(2) encourages all people of the United States 
to become more informed about diffuse intrinsic 
pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric brain cancer; 
(3) supports expanded research to better under-
stand DIPG, develop effective treatments, and pro-
vide comprehensive care for children with DIPG and 
their families; and 
(4) encourages the NCI and other research 
funders to elevate their consideration of mortality 
rate of a type of cancer as well as the life years lost 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR586.IH
HR586
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 586 IH 
as factors considered during the grant application 
process. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR586.IH
HR586
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
damage. For example, in February 2002, the British 
Medical Journal estimated that a 12.5 kiloton nu-
clear bomb (approximately the size of the bomb used 
at Hiroshima), if detonated in New York City, would 
cause 50,000 immediate deaths, 200,000 short-term 
deaths from high-exposure radiation injury, and 
700,000 cases of radiation sickness. 
(5) There are 103 nuclear power plants in the 
United States, each with the potential to expose area 
residents to high levels of radiation in the event of 
a successful attack. 
(6) For potentially stockpiled radioprotectants 
to be most effective, they must be administered soon 
after exposure to radiation, so the procurement of a 
radioprotectant must be large enough and located in 
enough regions of the country to facilitate the rapid 
treatment of the hundreds of thousands and poten-
tially millions of Americans who would be exposed to 
radiation, as well as the many ‘‘worried well’’ who 
will flood emergency rooms should a nuclear or radi-
ological attack or large accident occur. 
(7) Considering the need to rapidly administer 
a radioprotectant, Federal procurement of an effec-
tive radioprotectant should be comparable to stock-
(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis-
trator’’ means the Administrator of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) ENVIRONMENTAL HIGH IMPACT AREAS.—
The terms ‘‘Environmental High Impact Areas’’ and
‘‘EHIA’’ mean the 20 counties or other geographic
units that are designated pursuant to section 102.
(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means
the Secretary of the United States Department of
Health and Human Services.
(4) TOXIC
CHEMICALS.—The term ‘‘toxic
chemicals’’ includes all substances as defined in sec-
tion 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980;
any hazardous waste listed or identified pursuant to
the Solid Waste Disposal Act; any pollutant for
which air quality standards have been issued pursu-
ant to the Clean Air Act; any pollutant for which
water quality standards have been issued pursuant
to the Clean Water Act; any pollutant for which a
national primary drinking water regulation has been
issued pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act; all
materials registered pursuant to the Federal Insecti-
cide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act; and all sub-
stances and chemicals subject to reporting obliga-
(1) by striking ‘‘or (II)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (II)’’;
and
(2) by inserting before the semicolon ‘‘, eligi-
bility for assistance under the State plan under part
A of title IV, eligibility of a child to receive medical
assistance under the State plan under this title or
title XXI, (III) is a staff member of an elementary
school or secondary school, as such terms are de-
fined in section 14101 of the Elementary and Sec-
ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801), a
child care resource and referral center, or an agency
administering a State plan under part D of title IV,
or (IV) is so designated by the State’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1920A of
such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–1a) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii), by striking
‘‘paragraph 
(1)(A)’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘paragraph
(2)(A)’’; and
(2) in subsection (c)(2), in the matter preceding
subparagraph 
(A), 
by 
striking 
‘‘subsection
(b)(1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)(2)(A)’’.
Æ
•HRES 589 IH 
as such rule applies to a standing committee of the House, 
except to the extent inconsistent with this resolution. 
SEC. 5. STAFF; FUNDING. 
(a) STAFF.—The chair of the Select Committee, upon 
consultation with the ranking minority member of the Se-
lect Committee, may employ and fix the compensation of 
such staff as the chair considers necessary to carry out 
this resolution. 
(b) FUNDING.—There shall be paid out of the appli-
cable accounts of the House of Representatives such sums 
as may be necessary for the expenses of the Select Com-
mittee. Such payments shall be made on vouchers signed 
by the chair of the Select Committee and approved in the 
manner directed by the Committee on House Administra-
tion. Amounts made available under this subsection shall 
be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Committee on House Administration. 
SEC. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS. 
(a) FINAL REPORT.—The Select Committee shall 
issue a final report and recommendations, including legis-
lative proposals, not later than 60 days after the date of 
the adoption of this resolution. 
(b) INTERIM FINDINGS AND REPORTS.—In addition 
to the final report and recommendations required under 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:32 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR589.IH
HR589
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
V
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4588
For the relief of Irma Vladimirovna Koulimar.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 16, 1998
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Irma Vladimirovna Koulimar.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IRMA
VLADIMIROVNA KOULIMAR.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, Irma Vladimirovna Koulimar shall be eligible for
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi-
dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi-
grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment
of status to lawful permanent resident.
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. RES. 58 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 
in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 27, 2015 
Mr. THORNBERRY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on House Administration 
RESOLUTION 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 
Armed Services in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 
Resolved, 
SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 
For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Serv-
ices (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com-
mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 
shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 
of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $15,869,093 for the One Hundred Four-
teenth Congress. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:17 Jan 28, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR58.IH
HR58
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 58 IH 
SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 
Of the amount specified in section 1— 
(1) not more than $7,841,250.00 shall be avail-
able for expenses incurred during the period begin-
ning at noon on January 3, 2015, and ending imme-
diately before noon on January 3, 2016; and 
(2) not more than $8,027,843 shall be available 
for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 2016, and ending immediately 
before noon on January 3, 2017. 
SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 
Payments under this resolution shall be made on 
vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 
Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 
directed by the Committee on House Administration. 
SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 
Amounts made available under this resolution shall 
be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Committee on House Administration. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:17 Jan 28, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR58.IH
HR58
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Irma Vladimirovna
Koulimar enters the United States before the filing dead-
line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to
have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise
eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date
of the enactment of this Act.
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Irma Vladimirovna Koulimar, the Secretary of
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur-
ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num-
ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives
of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a)
of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable,
the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail-
able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under
section 202(e) of such Act.
Æ
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 590 
Establishing a Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 25, 2016 
Mr. WALKER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on Rules 
RESOLUTION 
Establishing a Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs. 
Resolved, 
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHING A SELECT COMMITTEE ON POW 
AND MIA AFFAIRS. 
There is established a select committee to be known 
as the Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs (here-
after referred to as the ‘‘select committee’’). 
SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS. 
The select committee shall conduct a full investiga-
tion of all unresolved matters relating to any United 
States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, 
the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, 
Persian Gulf War, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:19 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR590.IH
HR590
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 592 
Supporting the contributions of Catholic schools. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 28, 2016 
Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. BENISHEK, Ms. BORDALLO, 
Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. DANNY K. 
DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. 
FITZPATRICK, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. JONES, Mr. 
JOYCE, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 
NEAL, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. REED, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. RYAN of 
Ohio, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 
Ms. SPEIER, Mr. TIBERI, and Mr. YARMUTH) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce 
RESOLUTION 
Supporting the contributions of Catholic schools. 
Whereas Catholic schools in the United States are inter-
nationally acclaimed for their academic excellence, and 
provide students with more than an exceptional scholastic 
education; 
Whereas Catholic schools instill a broad, values-added edu-
cation emphasizing the lifelong development of moral, in-
tellectual, physical, and social values in young people in 
the United States; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:45 Jan 28, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR592.IH
HR592
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4587
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the dollar
limitation on the deduction for family-owned business interests does
not apply to interests in farming businesses.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 16, 1998
Mr. BOB SCHAFFER of Colorado (for himself, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. NOR-
WOOD, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. BOUCHER,
Mr. BASS, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. RYUN, Mr. HORN, Mr. NETHERCUTT,
Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. BAKER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.
ISTOOK, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. SKEEN, Mr.
REDMOND, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr.
KNOLLENBERG, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BLUNT,
Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. FORBES, Mr. WICKER,
Mr. MASCARA, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. STUMP, Mr. COOKSEY, Mr. PAUL, Mr.
LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CANNON, Mr.
BURR of North Carolina, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. LATHAM,
and Mr. BARCIA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that the dollar limitation on the deduction for family-
owned business interests does not apply to interests in
farming businesses.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
•HRES 592 IH 
Whereas Catholic schools provide a high level of service to the 
Nation by providing a diverse student population from all 
regions of the country and all socio-economic back-
grounds, with 36.4 percent of students from ethnic and 
racial backgrounds and 17.4 percent non-Catholic, a 
strong academic and moral foundation; 
Whereas Catholic schools are an affordable option for par-
ents, particularly in underserved urban areas; 
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated 
to their faith, values, families, and communities by pro-
viding an intellectually stimulating environment rich in 
spiritual, character, and moral development; 
Whereas Catholic schools are committed to community serv-
ice, producing graduates who hold ‘‘helping others’’ as 
one of their core values; 
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 
2015–2016 academic year is almost 2,000,000 and the 
student-teacher ratio was 13.1 to 1; 
Whereas Catholic schools educate a diverse population: 20.3 
percent racial minorities; 16.1 percent Hispanic/Latino; 
17.4 percent non-Catholic; 
Whereas the Catholic high school graduation rate is 99 per-
cent, with 87 percent of graduates attending 4-year col-
leges; 
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic 
education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops 
stated, ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by 
which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity 
of the person and building of community. Community is 
central to education ministry, both as a necessary condi-
tion and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:45 Jan 28, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR592.IH
HR592
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farm Preser-
vation Act’’.
SEC. 2. DOLLAR LIMITATION ON ESTATE TAX DEDUCTION
FOR FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS INTERESTS
NOT TO APPLY TO INTERESTS IN FARMING
BUSINESSES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 2057 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to family-
owned business interests), as amended by the Tax Tech-
nical Corrections Act of 1998, is amended by adding at
the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(4) DEDUCTION LIMITATION NOT TO APPLY
TO INTERESTS IN FARMING BUSINESSES.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) shall
not apply to qualified family-owned farming
business interests.
‘‘(B) QUALIFIED FAMILY-OWNED FARMING
BUSINESS
INTERESTS.—For purposes of sub-
paragraph (A), the term ‘qualified family-owned
farming business interest’ means any qualified
family-owned business interest if—
‘‘(i) in the case of an interest referred
to in subsection (e)(1)(A), the trade or
business referred to therein is a farming
business, and
‘‘(ii) in the case of an interest referred
to in subsection (e)(1)(B), all trades and
business carried on by the entity referred
to therein are farming businesses.
‘‘(C) FARMING BUSINESS.—For purposes
of subparagraph (B), the term ‘farming busi-
ness’ has the meaning given to such term by
section 263A(e)(4).’’
(b) PERIOD DURING WHICH RECAPTURE TAX AP-
PLIES REDUCED TO 3 YEARS IN CASE OF INTERESTS IN
FARMING
BUSINESSES.—Paragraph 
(1) 
of 
section
2057(f) of such Code, as so amended, is amended by in-
serting ‘‘(3 years in the case of qualified family-owned
farming business interests)’’ after ‘‘10 years’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ