327
‘‘(B) has complied with the Secretary’s in-
structions pursuant to paragraph (3). 
‘‘(3) DATA MATCH AND WITHHOLDING.—The Sec-
retary shall—
‘‘(A) compare information furnished pursu-
ant to paragraph (2)(A) with information on in-
dividuals who owe past-due support; 
‘‘(B) direct the gambling establishment to 
withhold from an individual’s net gambling 
winnings all amounts not exceeding the total 
past-due support owed by the individual; 
‘‘(C) authorize the gambling establishment, 
in reimbursement of its costs of complying with 
this subsection, to withhold and retain from such 
net gambling winnings an amount equal to 2 
percent of the amount to be withheld pursuant to 
subparagraph (B), which amount shall be taken 
first from any excess of such net winnings above 
the amount withheld pursuant to subparagraph 
(B), with any balance to be taken from the 
amount so withheld; and 
‘‘(D) require the gambling establishment to 
furnish written notice to the individual whose 
gambling winnings are withheld pursuant to this 
subsection, that includes—
328
‘‘(i) the amounts withheld pursuant to 
subparagraphs (B) and (C); 
‘‘(ii) the reason and authority for the 
withholding; and 
‘‘(iii) an explanation of the individ-
ual’s procedural due process rights, includ-
ing the right to contest such withholding to 
the responsible State agency and informa-
tion necessary to contact such State agency. 
‘‘(4) TRANSFER OF WITHHELD AMOUNTS.—Net 
amounts withheld for past-due support pursuant to 
subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (3) shall—
‘‘(A) be transferred by the gambling estab-
lishment to the Secretary at the same time and 
in the same manner as amounts withheld under 
section 3402(q) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 would be transferred to the Internal Rev-
enue Service, together with the information de-
scribed in paragraph (2)(A)(i) with respect to 
the individuals whose winnings were withheld 
under this subsection; and 
‘‘(B) be promptly transferred by the Sec-
retary to the appropriate State agency.
329
‘‘(5) NONLIABILITY
OF
GAMBLING
ESTABLISH-
MENTS.—A gambling establishment shall not be liable 
under any Federal or State law to any person—
‘‘(A) for any disclosure of information to 
the Secretary under this subsection; 
‘‘(B) for withholding or surrendering gam-
bling winnings in accordance with this sub-
section; or 
‘‘(C) for any other action taken in good 
faith to comply with this subsection. 
‘‘(6) DEFINITION OF GAMBLING WINNINGS.—In 
this subsection, the term ‘gambling winnings’ means 
the proceeds of a wager that are subject to reporting 
under section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986.’’. 
(b) REQUIREMENT FOR STATE LAWS.—Section 466(a) 
(42 U.S.C. 666(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph 
(19) the following: 
‘‘(20) INTERCEPTION OF GAMBLING WINNINGS.—
Procedures under which—
‘‘(A) gambling establishments subject to the 
laws of the State are required to comply with the 
provisions of section 452(n), and are subject to 
sanctions for failure to comply, which shall in-
clude liability in an amount equal to the amount
330
the establishment would have withheld if it so 
complied; 
‘‘(B) noncustodial parents owing past-due 
support are provided with written notice that 
gambling winnings may be subject to with-
holding for past-due support under section 
452(n); and 
‘‘(C) cases where such noncustodial parents 
contest the State’s determination with respect to 
past-due support are promptly resolved, and ex-
pedited refund is made of any amounts erro-
neously seized under such section 452(n).’’. 
(c) STATE REIMBURSEMENT OF FEDERAL COSTS.—
Section 453(k)(3) (42 U.S.C.653(k)(3)), as amended by sec-
tion 313(b), is amended by striking ‘‘or (m)’’ and inserting 
‘‘(m), or (n)’’. 
(d) 
REQUIREMENT
FOR
PARTICIPATING
INDIAN 
TRIBES.—Section 455(f) (42 U.S.C. 655(f)) is amended in 
the first sentence by striking ‘‘and location of absent par-
ents’’ and inserting ‘‘location of absent parents, and inter-
ception of gambling winnings consistent with the require-
ments of sections 452(n) and 466(a)(20)’’.
331
SEC. 319. STATE LAW REQUIREMENT CONCERNING THE 
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT 
(UIFSA). 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 466(f) (42 U.S.C. 666(f)) 
is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and as in effect on August 22, 
1996,’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘adopted as of such date’’ and in-
serting ‘‘adopted as of August, 2001’’. 
(b) FULL FAITH AND CREDIT FOR CHILD SUPPORT 
ORDERS.—Section 1738B of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended—
(1) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(d) CONTINUING EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), a 
court of a State that has made a child support order 
consistent with this section has continuing, exclusive 
jurisdiction to modify its order if the order is the con-
trolling order and—
‘‘(A) the State is the child’s State or the res-
idence of any individual contestant; or 
‘‘(B) if the State is not the residence of the 
child or an individual contestant, the contestants 
consent in a record or in open court that the