1198 
priorities covered by such report in order of urgency 
of priority. 
(c) UNFUNDED PRIORITY DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘unfunded priority’’, in the case of a fiscal year, 
means a program, activity, or mission requirement of the 
Missile Defense Agency that— 
(1) is not funded in the budget of the President 
for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursu-
ant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code; 
(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associ-
ated with an operational or contingency plan of a 
combatant command or other validated requirement; 
and 
(3) would have been recommended for funding 
through the budget referred to in paragraph (1) by 
the Director of the Missile Defense Agency in con-
nection with the budget if— 
(A) additional resources had been available 
for the budget to fund the program, activity, or 
mission requirement; or 
(B) the program, activity, or mission re-
quirement has emerged since the budget was 
formulated. 
SEC. 1671. REPORT ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
1199 
(1) The Secretary of Defense is conducting a 
ballistic missile defense review that will assess the 
capabilities and requirements for homeland, regional, 
and theater missile defense. 
(2) This review will have significant implica-
tions for national security and potentially on re-
source prioritization and requirements. 
(3) The review was initially expected to have 
been completed by January but has been delayed 
several months due to revisions and has not yet been 
submitted to Congress. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on ballistic missile defense that addresses the implica-
tions for planned programs of record, costs and resource 
prioritization, and strategic stability. 
(c) CBO REPORT ON COSTS RELATING TO BAL-
LISTIC, CRUISE, AND HYPERSONIC DEFENSES OF THE 
UNITED STATES.— 
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting 
forth the following:
1200 
(A) An estimate of the costs over the 10- 
year period beginning on the date of the report 
associated with— 
(i) fielding and maintaining the cur-
rent and planned ballistic, cruise, and 
hypersonic defenses of the United States; 
and 
(ii) 
implementing 
any 
new 
rec-
ommendations of the Ballistic Missile De-
fense Review with regard to ballistic, 
cruise, and hypersonic defenses. 
(B) An estimate of the costs to design, 
launch, maintain, and operate space-based sen-
sors of different constellation sizes ranging 
from limited to comprehensive. 
(2) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex. 
SEC. 1672. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE AND ROCKET 
DEFENSE 
COOPERATION 
BETWEEN 
THE 
UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The United States and Israel signed a 
Memorandum of Understanding on September 14,
1201 
2016, that covers the 10-year period beginning with 
fiscal year 2019. 
(2) The Memorandum of Understanding states 
that the United States will provide annual funding 
of $500,000,000 for cooperative programs to de-
velop, produce, and procure missile, rocket, and pro-
jectile defense capabilities to help Israel meet its se-
curity needs and to help develop and enhance the 
missile defense capabilities of the United States. 
(3) The Memorandum of Understanding further 
states that Israel may seek additional missile de-
fense funding from the United States in exceptional 
circumstances, as may be jointly agreed by the 
United States and Israel. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) the strong and enduring relationship be-
tween the United States and Israel is in the national 
security interest of both countries; and 
(2) the September 2016 Memorandum of Un-
derstanding between the United States and Israel, 
including the provisions of the memorandum relating 
to missile and rocket defense cooperation, is a crit-
ical component of the bilateral relationship.
1202 
SEC. 1673. REPORT ON COUNTERMEASURES TEST PRO-
GRAM. 
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report on the status of the countermeasures test 
program. The report shall include an evaluation and re-
sponse to the 2010 report by the JASON Defense Advi-
sory Panel titled ‘‘MDA Discrimination’’, numbered JSR- 
10.620, with regard to the recommendations of that report 
on forming a countermeasures test program through an 
independent agency to— 
(1) challenge the countermeasure efforts of the 
Missile Defense Agency; 
(2) design countermeasures for the Missile De-
fense Agency; 
(3) simulate such countermeasures against the 
national missile defense; and 
(4) as appropriate, in cooperation with the Di-
rector, build and test countermeasures in intercept 
flight tests.
1203 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 1681. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION TO ASSESS THE 
THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES FROM ELEC-
TROMAGNETIC PULSE ATTACKS AND SIMI-
LAR EVENTS. 
Section 1691 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1786) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (e)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘April 
1, 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘December 1, 2019’’; 
and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘October 
1, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1, 2019’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘October 1, 
2019’’ and inserting ‘‘the date that is 180 days after 
the date on which the Commission submits the re-
port under subsection (e)(1)’’. 
SEC. 1682. PROCUREMENT OF AMMONIUM PERCHLORATE 
AND OTHER CHEMICALS FOR USE IN SOLID 
ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.— 
(1) GOVERNMENT-OWNED, CONTRACTOR OPER-
ATED.—The Secretary of the Army and the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing
1204 
and Industrial Base Policy shall jointly conduct a 
business case analysis of the Federal Government 
using 
a 
Government-owned, 
contractor-operated 
model to ensure a robust domestic industrial base to 
supply specialty chemicals, including ammonium per-
chlorate, for use in solid rocket motors. Such anal-
ysis shall include assessments of the near- and long- 
term costs, operating and sustainment costs, pro-
gram impacts, opportunities for competition, oppor-
tunities for redundant or complementary capabili-
ties, and national security implications of using such 
a model. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2019, 
the Secretary and the Deputy Assistant Secretary 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
the business case analysis conducted under para-
graph (1). 
(b) FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.— 
(1) USE.—To the extent practicable, in award-
ing a contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate 
from retired solid rocket motors, the Secretary of 
Defense shall use full and open competition (as de-
fined in section 107 of title 41, United States Code). 
(2) NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary awards a 
contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate from
1205 
retired solid rocket motors using procedures that do 
not include full and open competition, the Secretary 
shall notify the congressional defense committees of 
such award not later than 30 days after the date of 
such award. 
SEC. 
1683. 
CONVENTIONAL 
PROMPT 
GLOBAL 
STRIKE 
HYPERSONIC CAPABILITIES. 
(a) VALIDATED REQUIREMENTS.—Not later than 
November 30, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a validated re-
quirement for ground-, sea-, or air-launched (or a com-
bination thereof) conventional prompt global strike 
hypersonic capabilities. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2019, the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretary of the 
Navy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
that contains the following: 
(1) A plan to deliver a conventional prompt 
global strike weapon system that— 
(A) is in accordance with section 1693 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1791); and
1206 
(B) includes— 
(i) options with cost estimates for ac-
celerating the initial capability for such 
system; and 
(ii) a description of policy decisions by 
the Secretary of Defense that are nec-
essary to employ hypersonic offense capa-
bilities from each potential launch platform 
of such system. 
(2) Details with respect to the assessed level of 
ambiguity and misinterpretation risk relating to the 
conventional prompt global strike weapon system, in-
cluding such potential risks associated with warhead 
ambiguity, platform ambiguity (including if adver-
sary sensors are degraded), perceptions of the sur-
vivability of strategic nuclear forces, and likely ad-
versary responses. 
(3) A description of whether, when, and how 
the Under Secretary would address the risks identi-
fied under paragraph (2) in developing and deploy-
ing the conventional prompt global strike weapon 
system and in developing the concept of operations 
for such system.
1207 
SEC. 1684. REPORT REGARDING INDUSTRIAL BASE FOR 
LARGE SOLID ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) REPORT.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than April 15, 
2019, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion and Sustainment, in consultation with the Sec-
retaries of the military departments that the Under 
Secretary determines appropriate, shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees a report 
on whether, and if so, how, the Federal Government 
will sustain more than one supplier for large solid 
rocket motors. 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The report under 
paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the fol-
lowing: 
(A) The risks within the industrial base for 
large solid rocket motors, including the risks to 
national security. 
(B) The near- and long-term costs associ-
ated with having a single source of large solid 
rocket motors as compared to having more than 
one such source. 
(C) Options for sustaining more than one 
supplier for large solid rocket motors, including 
through leveraging—
1208 
(i) the ground-based strategic deter-
rent program; 
(ii) the Trident II D5 fleet ballistic 
missile program; 
(iii) the ground-based midcourse de-
fense program; 
(iv) national security space launch 
programs; 
(v) programs of the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration; and 
(vi) any other applicable programs 
that use or may use solid rocket motors of 
any size, including with respect to substra-
tegic and tactical systems. 
(b) BRIEFING.—Not later than November 30, 2018, 
the Under Secretary shall provide to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Senate, and to any other appropriate congressional com-
mittee upon request, a briefing on the industrial base for 
large solid rocket motors. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means the following: 
(1) The congressional defense committees.
1209 
(2) The Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology and the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 
(3) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation and the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 1685. NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE WITH RE-
SPECT TO RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTER-
FERENCE IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES. 
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence 
shall commission and produce a National Intelligence Esti-
mate, which may be submitted in classified form with an 
unclassified summary, on Russian and Chinese inter-
ference in democratic countries around the world, includ-
ing the United States, that contains specific descriptions 
of such interference. Not later than 60 days after the sub-
mission of the National Intelligence Estimate required 
under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall report 
to Congress on efforts of the Department of Defense to 
deter such interference. Such report shall describe and as-
sess any actions taken by the Department, including co-
operation with other Federal agencies and other countries 
to deter such interference.
1210 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER FIVE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title 
XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, 
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2024. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
authorizations for military construction projects, land ac-
quisition, family housing projects and facilities, and con-
tributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
1211 
curity Investment Program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2024 for military con-
struction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2018; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Army may acquire real property and carry out military
1212 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama .........................
Anniston Army Depot ...........................................
$5,200,000 
California .......................
Fort Irwin ..............................................................
$29,000,000 
Colorado .........................
Fort Carson ...........................................................
$77,000,000 
Georgia ...........................
Fort Gordon ..........................................................
$99,000,000 
Indiana ...........................
Crane Army Ammunition Plant ............................
$16,000,000 
Kentucky ........................
Fort Campbell .......................................................
$50,000,000 
Fort Knox ..............................................................
$26,000,000 
Maryland ........................
Fort Meade ............................................................
$16,500,000 
New Jersey .....................
Picatinny Arsenal ..................................................
$41,000,000 
New Mexico ....................
White Sands Missile Range ...................................
$40,000,000 
New York .......................
U.S. Military Academy ..........................................
$160,000,000 
North Carolina ...............
Fort Bragg ............................................................
$10,000,000 
South Carolina ...............
Fort Jackson .........................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..............................
Fort Bliss ..............................................................
$24,000,000 
Fort Hood ..............................................................
$9,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Army may acquire real property and carry out the military 
construction project for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amount, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany ........................
East Camp Grafenwoehr ........................................
$31,000,000 
Honduras ........................
Soto Cano Air Base ................................................
$21,000,000 
Korea ...............................
Camp Tango ...........................................................
$17,500,000 
Kuwait .............................
Camp Arifjan ..........................................................
$44,000,000
1213 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 7601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Italy .........................
Vicenza ....................
Family Housing New 
Construction ........
$95,134,000 
Korea .......................
Camp Walker ...........
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction ...............
$68,000,000 
Puerto Rico ..............
Fort Buchanan ........
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction ...............
$26,000,000 
Wisconsin .................
Fort McCoy .............
Family Housing New 
Construction ........
$6,200,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 7601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $18,326,000.
1214 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2018, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 7601. 
SEC. 2104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 
3669), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 
Stat. 3670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2020, whichever 
is later.
1215 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation 
Project 
Amount 
California .................
Military Ocean Ter-
minal, Concord.
Access Control Point 
$9,900,000 
Japan .......................
Kadena Air Base .....
Missile Magazine .....
$10,600,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ......................
Camp Navajo ................................................
$14,800,000 
California ...................
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton ...........
$127,930,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar .............
$31,980,000 
Naval Air Station Lemoore ..........................
$127,590,000 
Naval Base Coronado ...................................
$156,580,000 
Naval Base San Diego .................................
$176,040,000 
Naval Base Ventura .....................................
$53,160,000 
Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach .............
$139,630,000 
District of Columbia ..
Naval Observatory ........................................
$115,600,000 
Florida .......................
Naval Air Station Whiting Field .................
$10,000,000 
Naval Station Mayport ................................
$111,460,000 
Georgia ......................
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany ...........
$31,900,000 
Guam .........................
Joint Region Marianas .................................
$355,257,000 
Hawaii .......................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ................
$123,320,000 
Marine Corps Base Hawaii ..........................
$66,100,000
1216 
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Maine .........................
Portsmouth Naval Yard ...............................
$149,685,000 
Mississippi .................
Naval Construction Battalion Center ..........
$22,300,000 
North Carolina ..........
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune ..............
$51,300,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point ......
$240,830,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Naval Support Activity Philadelphia ...........
$71,050,000 
South Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort .............
$15,817,000 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island 
$35,190,000 
Utah ...........................
Hill Air Force Base .....................................
$105,520,000 
Virginia ......................
Marine Corps Base Quantico .......................
$13,100,000 
Norfolk Naval Shipyard ...............................
$26,120,000 
Washington ................
Naval Base Kitsap .......................................
$88,960,000 
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island ...............
$27,380,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahamas ....................
Andros Island ...............................................
$31,050,000 
Bahrain ....................
SW Asia .......................................................
$26,340,000 
Cuba ..........................
Naval Station Guantanamo Bay ..................
$104,700,000 
Germany ....................
Panzer Kaserne ............................................
$43,950,000 
Japan .........................
Kadena Air Base ..........................................
$9,049,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table
1217 
in section 7601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Guam .......................
Joint Region Mari-
anas ......................
Replace Andersen 
Housing PH III ...
$83,441,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 7601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,502,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and 
available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 7601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may improve existing military family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $16,638,000.