429 
† HR 2810 EAS 
company’s financial statements during the 
time of such individual’s service; or 
(B) has served as chief financial officer, 
deputy chief financial officer, or an equivalent 
executive-level position with direct authority for 
financial management in a large public or pri-
vate sector organization. 
(2) PUBLIC
COMPANY
DEFINED.—In this sub-
section, the term ‘‘public company’’ has the meaning 
given the term ‘‘issuer’’ in section 2(7) of the Sar-
banes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7201(7)). 
(c) APPLICABILITY.—This section and the amendments 
made by this section shall take effect on the date of the en-
actment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to ap-
pointments that are made on or after that date. 
SEC. 908. FIVE-YEAR PERIOD OF RELIEF FROM ACTIVE 
DUTY AS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER OF A 
REGULAR 
COMPONENT 
OF 
THE 
ARMED 
FORCES FOR APPOINTMENT TO UNDER SEC-
RETARY OF DEFENSE POSITIONS. 
(a) UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH 
AND ENGINEERING.—Effective on February 1, 2018, and 
immediately after the coming into effect of the amendments 
made by subsection (a) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (130 Stat. 2339), section
430 
† HR 2810 EAS 
133a(a) of title 10, United States Code (as added by such 
subsection (a)), is amended by striking ‘‘seven years’’ and 
inserting ‘‘five years’’. 
(b) UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISI-
TION AND SUSTAINMENT.—Effective on February 1, 2018, 
and immediately after the coming into effect of the amend-
ments made by subsection (b) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (130 Stat. 2340), sec-
tion 133b(a) of title 10, United States Code (as added by 
such subsection (b)), is amended by striking ‘‘seven years’’ 
and inserting ‘‘five years’’. 
(c) UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICY.— 
Section 134(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘seven years’’ and inserting ‘‘five years’’. 
(d) 
UNDER
SECRETARY
OF
DEFENSE
(COMP-
TROLLER).—Section 135(a) of such title is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘A person may 
not be appointed as Under Secretary within five years after 
relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a reg-
ular component of the armed forces.’’. 
(e) UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PERSONNEL 
AND HEALTH.—Subsection (a) of section 136 of such title, 
as amended by section 906(a) of this Act, is further amend-
ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘A per-
son may not be appointed as Under Secretary within five
431 
† HR 2810 EAS 
years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer 
of a regular component of the armed forces.’’. 
(f) UNDER SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE
FOR INTEL-
LIGENCE.—Section 137(a) of such title is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘A person may 
not be appointed as Under Secretary within five years after 
relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a reg-
ular component of the armed forces.’’. 
SEC. 909. REDESIGNATION OF PRINCIPAL DEPUTY UNDER 
SECRETARIES 
OF 
DEFENSE 
AS 
DEPUTY 
UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE AND RE-
LATED MATTERS. 
(a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 137a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Principal’’ each place 
it appears. 
(b) INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED NUMBER.—Subsection 
(a)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘five’’ and 
inserting ‘‘six’’. 
(c) REPLACEMENT OF ATL POSITION WITH TWO PO-
SITIONS IN CONNECTION WITH OSD REFORM.—Subsection 
(c) of such section is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (5) 
as paragraphs (3) through (6), respectively; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
following new paragraphs:
432 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(1) One of the Deputy Under Secretaries is the Dep-
uty Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineer-
ing. 
‘‘(2) One of the Deputy Under Secretaries is the Dep-
uty Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment.’’. 
(d) REDESIGNATION OF DUSD FOR PERSONNEL AND 
READINESS AS DUSD FOR PERSONNEL AND HEALTH.— 
Paragraph (4) of subsection (c) of such section, as amended 
and redesignated by this section, is further amended by 
striking ‘‘Personnel and Readiness’’ and inserting ‘‘Per-
sonnel and Health’’. 
(e) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) OSD.—Paragraph (6) of section 131(b) of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(6) The Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.’’. 
(2) PRECEDENCE.—Section 138(d) of such title 
is amended by striking ‘‘Principal’’. 
(f) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE LEVEL IV.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Section 5315 of title 5, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Principal’’ in the items re-
lating to the Principal Deputy Under Secretary 
of Defense for Policy, the Principal Deputy
433 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and 
the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 
for Intelligence; and 
(B) by striking the item relating to the 
Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for 
Personnel and Readiness and inserting the fol-
lowing new item: 
‘‘Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Per-
sonnel and Health.’’. 
(2) OSD REFORM.—Section 5315 of such title is 
further amended by inserting before the item relating 
to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, 
as amended by paragraph (1)(A), the following new 
items: 
‘‘Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Re-
search and Engineering. 
‘‘Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion and Sustainment.’’. 
(g) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of sec-
tion 137a of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 137a. Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is
434 
† HR 2810 EAS 
amended by striking the item relating to section 137a 
and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘137a. Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.’’. 
(h) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), the amendments made by this section shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) ATL POSITION AMENDMENTS.—The amend-
ments made by subsections (b), (c), and (f)(2) of this 
section shall take effect on February 1, 2018, imme-
diately after the coming into effect of the amendments 
made by subsections (a) and (b) of section 901 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2339), to which 
the amendments made by subsections (b), (c), and 
(f)(2) of this section relate. 
SEC. 910. REDUCTION OF NUMBER AND ELIMINATION OF 
SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS OF ASSISTANT SEC-
RETARIES OF DEFENSE. 
(a) REDUCTION
OF AUTHORIZED NUMBER.—Sub-
section (a)(1) of section 138 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ‘‘14’’ and inserting ‘‘13’’. 
(b) ELIMINATION
OF CERTAIN SPECIFIC DESIGNA-
TIONS.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), and (5); and
435 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (6) as 
paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively. 
SEC. 911. LIMITATION ON MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DEPUTY 
ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE. 
The maximum number of Deputy Assistant Secretaries 
of Defense after the date of the enactment of this Act may 
not exceed 46. 
SEC. 912. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF OSD PER-
SONNEL FOR PURPOSES OF LIMITATION ON 
NUMBER OF OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF DE-
FENSE PERSONNEL. 
(a) MODIFICATION.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Section 143(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, as amended by section 903(a) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328), is further amended 
by striking ‘‘and detailed personnel’’ and inserting 
‘‘detailed, and contractor personnel’’. 
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
paragraph (1) shall take effect on October 1, 2018. 
(b) REPORT ON NUMBER OF CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL 
IN OSD AND EACH SECRETARIATE OF THE MILITARY DE-
PARTMENTS.—Not later than December 31, 2017, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report specifying the following:
436 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) The number of contractor personnel in the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense as of October, 1, 
2017. 
(2) The number of contractor personnel in each 
office of a Secretary of a military department as of 
October 1, 2017. 
Subtitle B—Organization of Other 
Department of Defense Offices 
and Elements 
SEC. 921. REDUCTION IN AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF ASSIST-
ANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DE-
PARTMENTS. 
(a) ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY.—Section 
3016(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘four’’. 
(b) ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE NAVY.—Section 
5016(a) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘four’’ and in-
serting ‘‘three’’. 
(c) ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE AIR FORCE.— 
Section 8016(a) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘four’’ 
and inserting ‘‘three’’.
437 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 922. QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF ASSIST-
ANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DE-
PARTMENTS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. 
(a) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.—Section 
3016(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(4)’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall 
have as his principal responsibility’’ and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(C) The principal responsibility of the Assistant Sec-
retary shall be’’; and 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (A), as des-
ignated by paragraph (1), the following new subpara-
graph (B): 
‘‘(B)(i) Any individual appointed as Assistant Sec-
retary shall be an individual who— 
‘‘(I) has significant financial management serv-
ice in— 
‘‘(aa) a Federal or State agency that re-
ceived an audit with an unqualified opinion on 
such agency’s financial statements during the 
time of such individual’s service; or 
‘‘(bb) a public company that received an 
audit with an unqualified opinion on such com-
pany’s financial statements during the time of 
such individual’s service; or
438 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(II) has served as chief financial officer, deputy 
chief financial officer, or an equivalent executive-level 
position with direct authority for financial manage-
ment in a large public or private sector organization. 
‘‘(ii) In this subparagraph, the term ‘public company’ 
has the meaning given the term ‘issuer’ in section 2(7) of 
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7201(7)).’’. 
(b) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY.—Section 
5016(b)(3) of such title is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(3)’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall 
have as his principal responsibility’’ and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(C) The principal responsibility of the Assistant Sec-
retary shall be’’; and 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (A), as des-
ignated by paragraph (1), the following new subpara-
graph (B): 
‘‘(B)(i) Any individual appointed as Assistant Sec-
retary shall be an individual who— 
‘‘(I) has significant financial management serv-
ice in— 
‘‘(aa) a Federal or State agency that re-
ceived an audit with an unqualified opinion on
439 
† HR 2810 EAS 
such agency’s financial statements during the 
time of such individual’s service; or 
‘‘(bb) a public company that received an 
audit with an unqualified opinion on such com-
pany’s financial statements during the time of 
such individual’s service; or 
‘‘(II) has served as chief financial officer, deputy 
chief financial officer, or an equivalent executive-level 
position with direct authority for financial manage-
ment in a large public or private sector organization. 
‘‘(ii) In this subparagraph, the term ‘public company’ 
has the meaning given the term ‘issuer’ in section 2(7) of 
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7201(7)).’’. 
(c) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE.—Sec-
tion 8016(b)(3) of such title is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(3)’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall 
have as his principal responsibility’’ and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(C) The principal responsibility of the Assistant Sec-
retary shall be’’; and 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (A), as des-
ignated by paragraph (1), the following new subpara-
graph (B):
440 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(B)(i) Any individual appointed as Assistant Sec-
retary shall be an individual who— 
‘‘(I) has significant financial management serv-
ice in— 
‘‘(aa) a Federal or State agency that re-
ceived an audit with an unqualified opinion on 
such agency’s financial statements during the 
time of such individual’s service; or 
‘‘(bb) a public company that received an 
audit with an unqualified opinion on such com-
pany’s financial statements during the time of 
such individual’s service; or 
‘‘(II) has served as chief financial officer, deputy 
chief financial officer, or an equivalent executive-level 
position with direct authority for financial manage-
ment in a large public or private sector organization. 
‘‘(ii) In this subparagraph, the term ‘public company’ 
has the meaning given the term ‘issuer’ in section 2(7) of 
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7201(7)).’’. 
(d) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and shall apply with respect to appointments that are 
made on or after that date.
441 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Subtitle C—Organization and Man-
agement of the Department of 
Defense Generally 
SEC. 931. REDUCTION IN LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE SES POSITIONS. 
Section 1109(a)(1) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is 
amended by striking ‘‘1,260’’ and inserting ‘‘1,140’’. 
SEC. 932. MANNER OF CARRYING OUT REDUCTIONS IN 
MAJOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEAD-
QUARTERS ACTIVITIES. 
Section 346(b) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 
796; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(5) MANNER OF CARRYING OUT REDUCTIONS.— 
Reductions in major Department of Defense head-
quarters activities pursuant to the headquarters re-
duction plan referred to in paragraph (1), as modi-
fied pursuant to that paragraph, shall be carried out 
after a consideration of the current manpower levels, 
historic manpower levels, mission requirements, and 
anticipated staffing needs of such headquarters activi-
ties necessary to meet national defense objectives. Fur-
ther, the plan required by subsection (a) shall be
442 
† HR 2810 EAS 
modified to take into account the requirement in the 
preceding sentence.’’. 
SEC. 933. CERTIFICATIONS ON COST SAVINGS ACHIEVED BY 
REDUCTIONS IN MAJOR DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES. 
Section 346(b) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 
796 10 U.S.C. 111 note), as amended by section 932 of this 
Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(6) 
CERTIFICATIONS
ON
COST
SAVINGS 
ACHIEVED.—Not later than 60 days after close of each 
of fiscal years 2017 through 2020, the Director of Cost 
Assessment and Program Evaluation shall certify to 
the Secretary of Defense, and to the congressional de-
fense committees, the following: 
‘‘(A) The validity of the cost savings 
achieved for each major Department of Defense 
headquarters activity during the fiscal year con-
cerned. 
‘‘(B) Whether the cost savings achieved for 
each major Department of Defense headquarters 
activity during the fiscal year concerned met the 
savings objective for such activity for such fiscal 
year, as established pursuant to paragraph (1).’’.
443 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 934. DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY FOR THE DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE FOR PERSONNEL TO ASSIST IN 
BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION AND MANAGE-
MENT INNOVATION. 
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may ap-
point in the Department of Defense individuals described 
in subsection (b) without regard to the provisions of sub-
chapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, for 
the purpose of assisting and facilitating the efforts of the 
Department in business transformation and management 
innovation. 
(b) COVERED
INDIVIDUALS.—The individuals de-
scribed in this subsection are individuals who have all of 
the following: 
(1) A management or business background. 
(2) Experience working with large or complex 
organizations. 
(3) Expertise in management and organizational 
change, data analytics, or business process design. 
(c) LIMITATION ON NUMBER.—The number of individ-
uals appointed pursuant to this section at any one time 
may not exceed 25 individuals. 
(d) NATURE
OF APPOINTMENT.—Any appointment 
under this section shall be on a term basis. The term of 
any such appointment shall be specified by the Secretary 
at the time of the appointment.
444 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 935. DATA ANALYTICS CAPABILITY FOR SUPPORT OF 
ENHANCED OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 
OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES AND DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE FIELD ACTIVITIES. 
(a) DATA ANALYTICS CAPABILITY REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—By not later than September 
30, 2020, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the 
Department of Defense shall establish and maintain 
within the Department of Defense a data analytics 
capability for purposes of supporting enhanced over-
sight and management of the Defense Agencies and 
Department of Defense Field Activities. 
(2) DISCHARGE
THROUGH
SUCCESSOR
POSI-
TION.—If the position of Deputy Chief Management 
Officer of the Department of Defense is succeeded by 
another position in the Department, the duties of the 
Deputy Chief Management Officer under this section 
shall be discharged by the occupant of such succeeding 
position. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The data analytics capability shall 
permit the following: 
(1) The maintenance on a continuing basis of an 
accurate tabulation of the amounts being expended by 
the Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field 
Activities on their personnel.
445 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) The maintenance on a continuing basis of an 
accurate number of the personnel currently sup-
porting the Defense Agencies and Field Activities, in-
cluding the following: 
(A) Members of the regular components of 
the Armed Forces. 
(B) Members of the reserve components of 
the Armed Forces. 
(C) Civilian employees of the Department of 
Defense. 
(D) Employees of contractors of the Depart-
ment, including federally funded research and 
development centers. 
(E) Detailees, whether from another organi-
zation or element of the Department or from an-
other department or agency of the Federal Gov-
ernment. 
(3) The maintenance of a continuing basis of the 
following: 
(A) An identification of the functions being 
performed by each Defense Agency and Field Ac-
tivity. 
(B) An accurate tabulation of the amounts 
being expended by each Defense Agency and 
Field Activity on its functions.
446 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(4) The streamlined assembly and analysis of 
data for purposes of the capability, including through 
appropriate automated processes. 
(c) RESOURCES.—In establishing the data analytics 
capability, the Deputy Chief Management Officer may use 
the following: 
(1) Data and information from each of the De-
fense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Ac-
tivities. 
(2) Data and information from the Defense Man-
power Data Center (DMDC). 
(3) Subject to the direction and control of the 
Secretary of Defense, any other resources of the De-
partment the Deputy Chief Management Officer con-
siders appropriate. 
(d) REPORTS.— 
(1) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than one year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Deputy 
Chief Management Officer shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the progress of 
the Deputy Chief Management Officer in establishing 
the data analytics capability. The report shall include 
the following: 
(A) A description and assessment of the ef-
forts of the Deputy Chief Management Officer
448 
† HR 2810 EAS 
shall, acting jointly through the Deputy Chief Management 
Officer and the Chief Information Officer of the Department 
of Defense, and in coordination with the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and 
the Armed Forces, establish a set of activities that use data 
analysis, measurement, and other evaluation-related meth-
ods to improve the acquisition outcomes of the Department 
of Defense and enhance organizational learning. 
(b) ACTIVITIES.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The set of activities estab-
lished under subsection (a) may include the following: 
(A) Establishment of data analytics capa-
bilities and organizations within the appropriate 
military service. 
(B) Development of capabilities in Depart-
ment of Defense laboratories, test centers, and 
Federally funded research and development cen-
ters to provide technical support for data ana-
lytics activities that support acquisition pro-
gram management and business process re-engi-
neering activities. 
(C) Increased use of existing analytical ca-
pabilities available to acquisition programs and 
offices to support improved acquisition outcomes.
449 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(D) Funding of intramural and extramural 
research and development activities to develop 
and implement data analytics capabilities in 
support of improved acquisition outcomes. 
(E) Publication, to the maximum extent 
practicable, and in a manner that protects clas-
sified and proprietary information, of data col-
lected by the Department related to acquisition 
program costs and activities for access and anal-
yses by the general public. 
(F) Clarification by the Chief of Staff of the 
Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief 
of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps, in coordination with the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics, of a consistent policy 
as to the role of data analytics in establishing 
budgets and making milestone decisions for 
major defense acquisition programs. 
(G) Continual assessment, in consultation 
with the private sector, of the efficiency of cur-
rent data collection and analyses processes, so as 
to minimize the requirement for collection and 
delivery of data by, from, and to government or-
ganizations.
450 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(H) Promulgation of guidance to acquisi-
tion programs and activities on the efficient use 
and sharing of data between programs and orga-
nizations to improve acquisition program ana-
lytics and outcomes. 
(I) Promulgation of guidance on assessing 
and enhancing quality of data and data anal-
yses to support improved acquisition outcomes. 
(2) GAP ANALYSIS OF CURRENT ACTIVITIES.— 
The Secretary shall, in coordination with the Armed 
Forces, identify the current activities, organizations, 
and groups of personnel that are pursuing tasks simi-
lar to those described in paragraph (1) that are being 
carried out as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 
The Secretary shall consider such current activities, 
organizations, and personnel in determining the set of 
activities to establish pursuant to subsection (a). 
(3) TRAINING AND EDUCATION.—The Secretary 
shall, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, conduct a 
review of the curriculum taught at the National De-
fense University, the Defense Acquisition University, 
and appropriate private sector academic institutions 
to determine the extent to which the curricula include 
appropriate courses on data analytics and other eval-
451 
† HR 2810 EAS 
uation-related methods and their application to de-
fense acquisitions. 
(c) DISCHARGE OF CERTAIN DUTIES.—After January 
31, 2018— 
(1) any duties under this section to be discharged 
by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the De-
partment of Defense shall be discharged by the Chief 
Management Officer of the Department of Defense; 
and 
(2) any duties under this section to be discharged 
by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics shall be discharged by the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment. 
SEC. 937. PILOT PROGRAMS ON DATA INTEGRATION STRAT-
EGIES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAMS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall, acting through the Chief Management Officer 
of the Department of Defense, carry out pilot programs to 
develop data integration strategies for the Department of 
Defense to address high-priority challenges of the Depart-
ment. 
(b) SCOPE OF PILOT PROGRAMS.—The pilot programs 
required by subsection (a) shall involve data integration
452 
† HR 2810 EAS 
strategies to address challenges of the Department with re-
spect to the following: 
(1) The budget of the Department. 
(2) Logistics. 
(3) Personnel security and insider threats. 
(4) At least two other high-priority challenges of 
the Department identified by the Secretary for pur-
poses of this section. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—In developing a data integration 
strategy to address a challenge of the Department for pur-
poses of a pilot program under this section, the Secretary 
shall do the following: 
(1) Identify the elements of the Department, and 
the officials of such elements, to be involved in car-
rying out the data integration strategy. 
(2) Specify the elements of the data integration 
strategy. 
(3) Specify the policies of the Department, if 
any, to be modified or waived in order to facilitate 
the carrying out of the data integration strategy by 
enabling timely and continuous sharing of informa-
tion needed to solve the challenge concerned. 
(d) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
453 
† HR 2810 EAS 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 
report on the pilot programs to be carried out under 
this section. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report shall include the fol-
lowing: 
(A) A description of each pilot program, in-
cluding the challenge of the Department to be ad-
dressed by such pilot program and the manner 
in which the data integration strategy under 
such pilot program will address the challenge. 
(B) If the carrying out of any pilot pro-
gram requires legislative action for the waiver or 
modification of a statutory requirement that pre-
vents or impedes the carrying out of the pilot 
program, a recommendation for legislative action 
to waive or modify such statutory requirement. 
SEC. 938. BACKGROUND AND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS 
FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL. 
(a) TRANSITION TO DISCHARGE BY DEFENSE SECU-
RITY SERVICE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense has 
the authority to conduct security, suitability, and 
credentialing background investigations. In carrying 
out such authority, the Secretary may use such au-
thority, or may delegate such authority to another en-
454 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tity. As part of providing for the conduct of back-
ground investigations initiated by the Department of 
Defense through the Defense Security Service by not 
later than the deadline specified in subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director of 
the Office of Personnel Management, provide for a 
phased transition from the conduct of such investiga-
tions by the National Background Investigations Bu-
reau (NBIB) of the Office of Personnel Management 
to the conduct of such investigations by the Defense 
Security Service by that deadline. 
(2) PHASED
TRANSITION.—The phased transi-
tion required by paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) provide for the transition of the conduct 
of investigations to the Defense Security Service 
using a risk management approach; and 
(B) be consistent with the transition from 
legacy information technology operated by the 
Office of Personnel Management to the new in-
formation technology, including the National 
Background Investigations System, as described 
in subsection (f). 
(b) COMMENCEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR 
ONGOING
DISCHARGE
OF
INVESTIGATIONS
THROUGH 
DSS.—Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary of De-
455 
† HR 2810 EAS 
fense shall commence carrying out the implementation plan 
developed pursuant to section 951(a)(1) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 
114–328; 130 Stat. 2371). 
(c) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS WITHIN DOD 
TO DSS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of meeting the 
requirements in subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary 
of Defense shall transfer the functions, personnel, and 
associated resources of the organizations specified in 
paragraph (2) to the Defense Security Service. 
(2) ORGANIZATIONS.—The organizations speci-
fied in this paragraph are the following: 
(A) The Consolidated Adjudications Facil-
ity. 
(B) The Personnel Security Assurance Divi-
sion of the Defense Manpower Data Center. 
(C) Other organizations identified by the 
Secretary for purposes of this subsection. 
(3) SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS.—In addition 
to the organizations identified pursuant to (2), the 
following organizations shall prioritize resources to 
directly support the execution of requirements in sub-
sections (a) and (b):
456 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(A) The Office of Cost Analysis and Pro-
gram Evaluation. 
(B) The Defense Digital Services. 
(C) Other organizations designated by the 
Secretary for purposes of this paragraph. 
(4) TIMING AND MANNER OF TRANSFER.—The 
Secretary— 
(A) may carry out the transfer required by 
paragraph (1) at any time before the date speci-
fied in subsection (b) that the Secretary considers 
appropriate for purposes of this section; and 
(B) shall carry out the transfer in a man-
ner designed to minimize disruptions to the con-
duct of background investigations for personnel 
of the Department of Defense. 
(d) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS IN OPM TO 
DSS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of meeting the 
requirements in subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary 
of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of 
the Office of Personnel Management, provide for the 
transfer of the functions described in paragraph (2), 
and any associated personnel and resources, to the 
Department of Defense.
457 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) FUNCTIONS.—The functions described in this 
paragraph are the following: 
(A) Any personnel security investigations 
functions transferred by the Secretary to the Di-
rector pursuant to section 906 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 
(5 U.S.C. 1101 note). 
(B) Any other functions of the Office of Per-
sonnel Management in connection with back-
ground investigations initiated by the Depart-
ment of Defense that the Secretary and the Di-
rector jointly consider appropriate. 
(3) LOCATION
WITHIN
DOD.—Any functions 
transferred to the Department pursuant to this sub-
section shall be located within the Defense Security 
Service. 
(e) CONDUCT OF CERTAIN ACTIONS.—For purposes of 
the conduct of background investigations following the com-
mencement of the carrying out of the implementation plan 
referred to in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall 
provide for the following: 
(1) A single capability for the centralized fund-
ing, submissions, and processing of all background in-
vestigations, from within the Defense Security Serv-
ice.
458 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) The discharge by the Consolidated Adjudica-
tions Facility, from within the Defense Security Serv-
ice pursuant to transfer under subsection (c), of adju-
dications in connection with the following: 
(A) Background investigations. 
(B) Continuous evaluation and vetting 
checks. 
(f) ENHANCEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CA-
PABILITIES OF NBIS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall, in consultation with the Director of the Office 
of Personnel Management, conduct a review of the in-
formation technology capabilities of the National 
Background Investigations System (NBIS) in order to 
determine whether enhancements to such capabilities 
are required for the following: 
(A) Support for background investigations 
pursuant to this section and section 951 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2017. 
(B) Support of the National Background 
Investigations Bureau. 
(C) Execution of the conduct of background 
investigations initiated by the Department of
459 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Defense pursuant to this section, including sub-
missions and adjudications. 
(2) COMMON COMPONENT.—In providing for the 
transition and operation of the System as described 
in paragraph (1)(C), the Secretary shall, in consulta-
tion with the Director, develop a common component 
of the System usable for background investigations by 
both the Defense Security Service and the National 
Background Investigations Bureau. 
(3) ENHANCEMENTS.—If the review pursuant to 
paragraph (1) determines that enhancements de-
scribed in that paragraph are required, the Secretary 
shall, in consultation with the Director, carry out 
such enhancements. 
(g) USE OF CERTAIN PRIVATE INDUSTRY DATA.—In 
carrying out background and security investigations pursu-
ant to this section and section 951 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, the Secretary of 
Defense may use background materials collected on individ-
uals by the private sector, in accordance with national poli-
cies and standards, that are applicable to such investiga-
tions, including materials as follows: 
(1) Financial information, including credit 
scores and credit status. 
(2) Criminal records.
460 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(3) Drug screenings. 
(4) Verifications of information on resumes and 
employment applications (such as previous employers, 
educational achievement, and educational institutions 
attended). 
(5) Other publicly available electronic informa-
tion. 
(h) SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR CONTRACTOR PER-
SONNEL.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
review the requirements of the Department of Defense 
relating to position sensitivity designations for con-
tractor personnel in order to determine whether such 
requirements may be reassessed or modified to reduce 
the number and range of contractor personnel who are 
issued security clearances in connection with work 
under contracts with the Department. 
(2) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary shall issue guid-
ance to program managers, contracting officers, and 
security personnel of the Department specifying re-
quirements for the review of contractor position sensi-
tivity designations and the number of contractor per-
sonnel of the Department who are issued security 
clearances for the purposes of determining whether the
461 
† HR 2810 EAS 
number of such personnel who are issued security 
clearances should and can be reduced. 
(i) PERSONNEL TO SUPPORT
THE TRANSFER
OF 
FUNCTIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall authorize the 
Director of the Defense Security Service to promptly in-
crease personnel for the purpose of beginning the establish-
ment and expansion of investigative capacity to support the 
phased transfer of investigative functions from the Office 
of Personnel Management to the Department of Defense 
under this section. The Director of Cost Analysis and Pro-
gram Assessment shall advise the Secretary on the size of 
the initial investigative workforce and the rate of growth 
of that workforce. 
(j) BRIEFINGS AND REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORT ON FUTURE PERIODIC REINVESTIGA-
TIONS, INSIDER
THREAT, AND
CONTINUOUS
VET-
TING.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, 
in consultation with the Director of National Intel-
ligence and the Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management, submit to Congress a report that in-
cludes the following: 
(A) An assessment of the feasibility and ad-
visability of periodic reinvestigations of back-
462 
† HR 2810 EAS 
grounds of Government and contractor personnel 
with security clearances. 
(B) A plan to provide the Government with 
an enhanced risk management model which re-
duces the gaps in coverage perpetuated by the 
current 
time-based 
periodic 
reinvestigations 
model, particularly in light of the increasing use 
of continuous background evaluations of such 
personnel. 
(C) A plan for expanding continuous back-
ground vetting capabilities such as the Installa-
tion Matching Engine for Security and Analysis 
to the broader population, including those at the 
lowest Tiers and levels of access, which plan shall 
include details to ensure that all individuals 
credentialed for physical access to Department of 
Defense facilities and installations are vetted to 
the same level of fitness determinations and sub-
ject to appropriate continuous vetting. 
(D) A plan to fully integrate and incor-
porate insider threat data, tools, and capabilities 
into the new end-to-end vetting processes and 
supporting information technology established by 
the Defense Security Service to ensure a holistic 
and transformational approach to detecting, de-
463 
† HR 2810 EAS 
terring, and mitigating threats posed by trusted 
insiders. 
(2) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—Not later than the 
end of each calendar year quarter after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Sen-
ate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the 
progress of the Secretary in carrying out the require-
ments of this section during such calendar year quar-
ter. Until the backlog of security clearance applica-
tions at the National Background Investigations Bu-
reau is eliminated, each quarterly briefing shall also 
include the current status of the backlog and the re-
sulting mission and resource impact to the Depart-
ment of Defense and the defense industrial base. 
(3) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than the end of 
each calendar year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the committees 
of Congress referred to in paragraph (2) a report on 
the following for the calendar year in which such re-
port is to be submitted: 
(A) The status of the Secretary in meeting 
the requirements in subsections (a), (b), and (c) 
as of the end of such calendar year.
464 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(B) The status as of the end of such cal-
endar year of any transfers to be carried out 
pursuant to subsection (d). 
(C) An assessment of the personnel security 
capabilities of the Department of Defense as of 
the end of such calendar year. 
(4) TERMINATION.—No briefing or report is re-
quired pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) after Decem-
ber 31, 2020. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 951. TRANSFER OF LEAD OF GUAM OVERSIGHT COUN-
CIL FROM THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DE-
FENSE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY. 
(a) TRANSFER.—Section 5013 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(h) Until September 30, 2020, the Secretary of the 
Navy shall lead the Guam Oversight Council and shall be 
the principal representative of the Department of Defense 
for coordinating the interagency efforts in matters relating 
to Guam, including the following executive orders: 
‘‘(1) Executive Order No. 13299 of May 12, 2003 
(68 Fed. Reg. 25477; 48 U.S.C. note prec. 1451; relat-
ing to the Interagency Group on Insular Affairs).
465 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(2) Executive Order No. 12788 of January 15, 
1992, as amended (57 Fed. Reg. 2213; relating to the 
Defense Economic Adjustment Program).’’. 
(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 
132 of such title is amended by striking subsection (e). 
SEC. 952. CORROSION CONTROL AND PREVENTION EXECU-
TIVES MATTERS. 
(a) SCOPE AND LEVEL OF POSITIONS.—Subsection (a) 
of section 903 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2228 note) 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘shall be the senior official’’ and 
inserting ‘‘shall be a senior official’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘Each individual so designated shall be a sen-
ior civilian employee of the military department con-
cerned in pay grade GS–15 or higher.’’. 
(b) QUALIFICATIONS.—Such section is further amend-
ed— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection 
(c); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following 
new subsection (b):
466 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(b) QUALIFICATIONS.—Any individual designated as 
a corrosion control and prevention executive of a military 
department pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 
‘‘(1) have a working knowledge of corrosion pre-
vention and control; 
‘‘(2) have strong program management and com-
munication skills; and 
‘‘(3) understand the acquisition, research, devel-
opment, test, and evaluation, and sustainment poli-
cies and procedures of the military department, in-
cluding for the sustainment of infrastructure.’’. 
SEC. 953. REQUIREMENT FOR NATIONAL LANGUAGE SERV-
ICE CORPS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1) of 813 of the 
David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 
(50 U.S.C. 1913) is amended by striking ‘‘may establish 
and maintain’’ and inserting ‘‘shall establish and main-
tain’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘If the Secretary establishes 
the Corps, the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’. 
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.—
467 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the 
Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in 
the national interest, the Secretary may transfer 
amounts of authorizations made available to the De-
partment of Defense in this division for fiscal year 
2018 between any such authorizations for that fiscal 
year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of au-
thorizations so transferred shall be merged with and 
be available for the same purposes as the authoriza-
tion to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in para-
graph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the 
Secretary may transfer under the authority of this 
section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 
(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILI-
TARY
PERSONNEL
AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of 
funds between military personnel authorizations 
under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar 
limitation in paragraph (2). 
(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by sub-
section (a) to transfer authorizations— 
(1) may only be used to provide authority for 
items that have a higher priority than the items from 
which authority is transferred; and
468 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an 
item that has been denied authorization by Congress. 
(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A trans-
fer made from one account to another under the authority 
of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount au-
thorized for the account to which the amount is transferred 
by an amount equal to the amount transferred. 
(d) NOTICE
TO
CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall 
promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under sub-
section (a). 
SEC. 1002. CALCULATIONS FOR PAYMENTS INTO DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY RETIREMENT 
FUND USING SINGLE LEVEL PERCENTAGE OF 
BASIC PAY DETERMINED ON ARMED FORCE- 
WIDE RATHER THAN ARMED FORCES-WIDE 
BASIS. 
Section 1465 of title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed— 
(1) in subsection (c)(1), in the flush matter at 
the end of paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Such single 
level’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided in 
subsection (d), such single level’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 
subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
469 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following 
new subsection (d): 
‘‘(d)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (c), in any actu-
arial valuation of Department of Defense military retire-
ment and survivor benefits programs for purposes of a fiscal 
year beginning after fiscal year 2018— 
‘‘(A) the determination made pursuant to sub-
section (c)(1)(A) shall be a single level percentage of 
basic pay for active duty for each armed force (other 
than the Coast Guard) and for each of the Army Na-
tional Guard and the Air National Guard for full- 
time National Guard duty (rather than the single 
level percentage of basic pay otherwise required by 
that subsection); and 
‘‘(B) the determination made pursuant to sub-
section (c)(1)(B) shall be a single level percentage of 
basic pay and of compensation for members of the Se-
lected Reserve of each armed force (other than the 
Coast Guard) (rather than the single level percentage 
of basic pay and of compensation otherwise required 
by that subsection). 
‘‘(2) In making calculations for purposes of subsection 
(b)(1) for fiscal years after fiscal year 2018— 
‘‘(A) the Secretary of Defense—
470 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(i) shall not use the single level percentage 
of basic pay determined under subsection 
(c)(1)(A) 
as 
provided 
for 
in 
subsection 
(b)(1)(A)(i); but 
‘‘(ii) shall use for purposes of subsection 
(b)(1)(A)(i) each separate single level percentage 
of basic pay determined under paragraph (1)(A) 
for each armed force and for each of the Army 
National Guard and the Air National Guard; 
and 
‘‘(B) the Secretary of Defense— 
‘‘(i) shall not use the single level percentage 
of basic pay and of compensation determined 
under subsection (c)(1)(B) as provided for in 
subsection (b)(1)(B)(i); but 
‘‘(ii) shall use for purposes of subsection 
(b)(1)(B)(i) each separate single level percentage 
of basic pay and of compensation determined 
under paragraph (1)(B) for each armed force. 
‘‘(3) In making calculations for purposes of section 
1466(a) of this title for purposes of deposits into the Fund 
for months in fiscal years after fiscal year 2018— 
‘‘(A) the Secretary of Defense— 
‘‘(i) shall not use the single level percentage 
of basic pay determined under subsection
471 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(c)(1)(A) 
as 
provided 
for 
in 
section 
1466(a)(1)(A) of this title; but 
‘‘(ii) shall use for purposes of section 
1466(a)(1)(A) of this title each separate single 
level percentage of basic pay determined under 
paragraph (1)(A) for each armed force and for 
each of the Army National Guard and the Air 
National Guard; and 
‘‘(B) the Secretary of Defense— 
‘‘(i) shall not use the single level percentage 
of basic pay and of compensation determined 
under subsection (c)(1)(B) as provided for in sec-
tion 1466(a)(2)(A) of this title; but 
‘‘(ii) shall use for purposes of section 
1466(a)(2)(A) each separate single level percent-
age of basic pay and of compensation determined 
under paragraph (1)(B) for each armed force.’’. 
SEC. 1003. CERTIFICATIONS ON AUDIT READINESS OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE MILI-
TARY DEPARTMENTS, DEFENSE AGENCIES, 
AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND ELEMENTS 
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Not later than Sep-
tember 30, 2017, and each year thereafter, the Secretary 
of Defense shall certify to the congressional defense commit-
472 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tees whether or not the full financial statements of the De-
partment of Defense are audit ready as of the date of such 
certification. 
(b) MILITARY DEPARTMENTS, DEFENSE AGENCIES, 
AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND ELEMENTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 
2017, and each year thereafter, each Secretary of a 
military department, each head of a Defense Agency, 
and each head of any other organization or element 
of the Department of Defense designated by the Sec-
retary of Defense for purposes of this subsection shall 
certify to the congressional defense committees whether 
or not the full financial statements of the military de-
partment, the Defense Agency, or the organization or 
element concerned became audit ready during the fis-
cal year in which such certification is to be sub-
mitted. 
(2) TRANSMITTAL THROUGH SECRETARY OF DE-
FENSE.—The individual certifications required by 
this subsection shall be transmitted to the congres-
sional defense committees collectively by the Secretary 
under procedures established by the Secretary for pur-
poses of this subsection. 
(c) TERMINATION ON RECEIPT OF AUDIT OPINION ON 
FULL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.—A certification is no
473 
† HR 2810 EAS 
longer required under subsection (a) or (b) with respect to 
the Department of Defense, or a military department, De-
fense Agency, or organization or element of the Department, 
as applicable, after the Department of Defense or such mili-
tary department, Defense Agency, or organization or ele-
ment receives an audit opinion on its full financial state-
ments. 
(d) AUDIT READY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘audit ready’’, with respect to the full financial statements 
of the Department of Defense, a military department, a De-
fense Agency, or another organization or element of the De-
partment of Defense, means that the Department of Defense, 
the military department, the Defense Agency, or the organi-
zation or element has in place critical audit capabilities 
and associated infrastructure to successfully start and sup-
port a financial audit of its full financial statements. 
SEC. 1004. FAILURE TO OBTAIN AUDIT OPINION ON FISCAL 
YEAR FULL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) REDUCTION IN BASIC PAY OF MILITARY SECRE-
TARIES FOR FAILURE TO OBTAIN AUDIT OPINION ON FULL 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018 AND 
THEREAFTER.—If the Department of Defense does not ob-
tain an audit opinion on its full financial statements for 
fiscal year 2018, or any fiscal year thereafter, by March
474 
† HR 2810 EAS 
31 of the succeeding calendar year, the annual rate of basic 
pay payable for each Secretary of a military department 
for the calendar year next following such succeeding cal-
endar year shall be the annual rate of basic pay for posi-
tions at level III of the Executive Schedule pursuant to sec-
tion 5313 of title 5, United States Code, rather than the 
annual rate of basic pay otherwise provided for the posi-
tions of Secretary of a military department by law. 
(b) REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON EFFORTS TO 
OBTAIN AUDIT OPINION ON FULL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 BY MARCH 31, 2019.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Department does not 
obtain an audit opinion on its full financial state-
ments for fiscal year 2018 by March 31, 2019, the 
Secretary of Defense shall establish within the De-
partment a team of distinguished, private sector ex-
perts with experience conducting financial audits of 
large public or private sector organizations to review 
and make recommendations to improve the efforts of 
the Department to obtain an audit opinion on its full 
financial statements. 
(2) SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES.—The team established 
pursuant to paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) identify impediments to the progress of 
the Department in obtaining an audit opinion
475 
† HR 2810 EAS 
on its full financial statements, including an 
identification of the organizations or elements 
that are lagging in their efforts toward obtaining 
such audit opinion; 
(B) estimate when an audit opinion on the 
full financial statements of the Department will 
be obtained; and 
(C) consider mechanisms and incentives to 
support efficient achievement by the Department 
of its audit goals, including organizational 
mechanisms to transfer direction and manage-
ment control of audit activities from subordinate 
organizations to the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, individual personnel incentives, work-
force improvements (including in senior leader-
ship positions), business process, technology, and 
systems improvements (including the use of data 
analytics), and metrics by which the Secretary 
and Congress may measure and assess progress 
toward achievement of the audit goals of the De-
partment. 
(3) REPORT.—If the Secretary takes action pur-
suant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, not later 
than September 30, 2019, submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the team established
476 
† HR 2810 EAS 
pursuant to that paragraph, including a description 
of the actions taken and to be taken by the team pur-
suant to paragraph (2). 
SEC. 1005. IMPROPER PAYMENT MATTERS. 
Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) shall take the following actions: 
(1) With regard to estimating improper pay-
ments: 
(A) Establish and implement key quality 
assurance procedures, such as reconciliations, to 
ensure the completeness and accuracy of sampled 
populations. 
(B) Revise the procedures for the sampling 
methodologies of the Department of Defense so 
that such procedures— 
(i) comply with Office of Management 
and Budget guidance and generally accept-
ed statistical standards; 
(ii) produce statistically valid im-
proper payment error rates, statistically 
valid improper payment dollar estimates, 
and appropriate confidence intervals for 
both; and
477 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(iii) in meeting clauses (i) and (ii), 
take into account the size and complexity of 
the transactions being sampled. 
(2) With regard to identifying programs suscep-
tible to significant improper payments, conduct a risk 
assessment that complies with the Improper Payments 
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (Public Law 
111–204) and the amendments made by that Act (in 
this section collectively referred to as ‘‘IPERA’’). 
(3) With regard to reducing improper payments, 
establish procedures that produce corrective action 
plans that— 
(A) comply fully with IPERA and associ-
ated Office of Management and Budget guidance, 
including by holding individuals responsible for 
implementing corrective actions and monitoring 
the status of corrective actions; and 
(B) are in accordance with best practices, 
such as those recommended by the Chief Finan-
cial Officers Council, including by providing 
for— 
(i) measurement of the progress made 
toward remediating root causes of improper 
payments; and
478 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(ii) communication to the Secretary of 
Defense and the heads of departments, agen-
cies, and organizations and elements of the 
Department of Defense, and key stake-
holders, on the progress made toward reme-
diating the root causes of improper pay-
ments. 
(4) With regard to implementing recovery audits 
for improper payments, develop and implement proce-
dures to— 
(A) identify costs related to the recovery au-
dits and recovery efforts of the Department of 
Defense; and 
(B) evaluate improper payment recovery ef-
forts in order to ensure that they are cost effec-
tive. 
(5) Monitor the implementation of the revised 
chapter of the Financial Management Regulations on 
recovery audits in order to ensure that the Depart-
ment of Defense, the military departments, the De-
fense Agencies, and the other organizations and ele-
ments of the Department of Defense either conduct re-
covery audits or demonstrate that it is not cost effec-
tive to do so.
479 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(6) Develop and submit to the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget for approval a payment recapture 
audit plan that fully complies with Office of Manage-
ment and Budget guidance. 
(7) With regard to reporting on improper pay-
ments, design and implement procedures to ensure 
that the annual improper payment and recovery 
audit reporting of the Department of Defense is com-
plete, accurate, and complies with IPERA and associ-
ated Office of Management and Budget guidance. 
SEC. 1006. FINANCIAL OPERATIONS DASHBOARD FOR THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) FINANCIAL OPERATIONS DASHBOARD.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of De-
fense (Comptroller) shall develop and maintain on an 
Internet website available to Federal Government 
agencies a tool (commonly referred to as a ‘‘dash-
board)’’ to permit Federal Government officials to 
track key indicators of the financial performance of 
the Department of Defense, including outstanding ac-
counts payable, abnormal accounts payable, out-
standing advances, unmatched disbursements, abnor-
mal undelivered orders, negative unliquidated obliga-
tions, violations of sections 1341 and 1517(a) of title 
31, United States Code (commonly referred to as the
480 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘Anti-Deficiency Act’’), costs deriving from payment 
delays, interest penalty payments, and improper pay-
ments, and actual savings realized through interest 
payments made, discounts for timely or advanced 
payments, and other financial management and im-
provement initiatives. 
(2) INFORMATION
COVERED.—The tool shall 
cover financial performance information for the mili-
tary departments, the defense agencies, and any other 
organizations or elements of the Department of De-
fense. 
(3) TRACKING OF PERFORMANCE OVER TIME.— 
The tool shall permit the tracking of financial per-
formance over time, including by month, quarter, and 
year, and permit users of the tool to export both cur-
rent and historical data on financial performance. 
(4) UPDATES.—The information covered by the 
tool shall be updated not less frequently than monthly. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT ON VALUE CREATED BY IM-
PROVED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.—Not later than Decem-
ber 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
Congress a report setting forth, for each military depart-
ment, defense agency, and other organization or element of 
the Department of Defense, the following:
481 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) A description of the value, if any, that ac-
crued as a result of improved financial management 
and related cost-savings initiatives during the most 
recent fiscal year. 
(2) A description of the manner in which such 
value, if any, was applied, and will be applied, to 
provide mission value. 
(3) A target for the savings to be achieved as a 
result of improved financial management and related 
cost-savings initiatives during the fiscal year in 
which such report is submitted. 
SEC. 1007. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED 
STATES RECOMMENDATIONS ON AUDIT CAPA-
BILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND RE-
LATED MATTERS. 
(a) BI-MONTHLY SUMMARY OF STATUS OF AUDIT COR-
RECTIVE ACTION PLAN.—The Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) shall assemble on a bi-monthly basis a man-
agement summary of the current status of actions under 
the consolidated audit corrective action plan (CAP) with 
respect to the critical audit capabilities and associated in-
frastructure of the Department of Defense, the military de-
partments, the Defense Agencies, and other organizations 
and elements of the Department of Defense.
482 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(b) CENTRALIZED
MONITORING
AND
REPORTING 
PROCESS.—The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) 
shall develop and implement a centralized monitoring and 
reporting process that captures and maintains up-to-date 
information, including the standard data elements rec-
ommended in the Implementation Guide for OMB Circular 
A–123, for all corrective action plans Department of De-
fense-wide that pertain to critical audit capabilities and 
associated infrastructure. 
SEC. 1008. INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
FUNDING IN DEPARTMENT PRESS RELEASES 
AND RELATED PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON PRO-
GRAMS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIVITIES FUNDED 
BY THE DEPARTMENT. 
(a) INFORMATION REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 134 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by insert-
ing after section 2257 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2258. Department of Defense press releases and re-
lated public statements on Department 
funded programs, projects, and activities 
‘‘Any press release, statement, or other document 
issued to the public by the Department of Defense that de-
scribes a program, project, or activity funded, whether in 
whole or in part, by amounts provided by the Department,
483 
† HR 2810 EAS 
including any project, project, or activity of a foreign, 
State, or local government, shall clearly state the following: 
‘‘(1) That the program, project, or activity is 
funded, in whole or in part (as applicable), by funds 
provided by the Department. 
‘‘(2) An estimate of the amount of funding from 
the Department that the program, project, or activity 
currently receives.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 134 
of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 2257 the following new item: 
‘‘2258. Department of Defense press releases and related public statements on De-
partment funded programs, projects, and activities.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and shall apply with respect to programs, projects, and 
activities funded by the Department of Defense with 
amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years after 
fiscal year 2018.
484 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Subtitle B—Counterdrug Activities 
SEC. 1011. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 
TO SUPPORT A UNIFIED COUNTERDRUG AND 
COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN COLOM-
BIA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. 
Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most re-
cently amended by section 1013 of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 
130 Stat. 2385), is further amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and 
inserting ‘‘2022’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and in-
serting ‘‘2022’’. 
(b) SCOPE OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of such sec-
tion 1021 is further amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘organizations 
designated as’’ and all that follows and inserting 
‘‘terrorist organizations and other illegally armed 
groups determined by the Secretary of Defense to pose 
a significant threat to the national security interests 
of the United States.’’; and
485 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘authority’’ 
and all that follows and inserting ‘‘authority as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(A) To protect human health and welfare in 
emergency circumstances, including the undertaking 
of rescue operations. 
‘‘(B) To support efforts to demobilize, disarm, 
and reintegrate members of illegally armed groups.’’. 
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and 
Shipyards 
SEC. 1016. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES ON MINIMUM 
NUMBER OF BATTLE FORCE SHIPS. 
(a) POLICY.—It shall be the policy of the United States 
to have available, as soon as practicable, not fewer than 
355 battle force ships, comprised of the optimal mix of plat-
forms, with funding subject to the availability of appropria-
tions or other funds. 
(b) BATTLE FORCE SHIPS DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘battle force ships’’ has the meaning given the term 
in Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5030.8C. 
SEC. 1017. OPERATIONAL READINESS OF LITTORAL COM-
BAT SHIPS ON EXTENDED DEPLOYMENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 7310 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended—
486 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) by inserting ‘‘UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE 
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY’’ in the subsection heading 
after ‘‘VESSELS’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘A naval vessel (or any other ves-
sel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 
Navy)’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Except as provided in 
paragraph (2), a naval vessel’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(2)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), in the case of 
a naval vessel classified as a Littoral Combat Ship and op-
erating on deployment, corrective and preventive mainte-
nance or repair (whether intermediate or depot level) and 
facilities maintenance may be performed on the vessel— 
‘‘(i) in a foreign shipyard; 
‘‘(ii) at a facility outside of a foreign shipyard; 
or 
‘‘(iii) at any other facility convenient to the ves-
sel. 
‘‘(B)(i) Corrective and preventive maintenance or re-
pair may be performed on a vessel as described in subpara-
graph (A) if the work is performed by United States Gov-
ernment personnel or United States contractor personnel.
487 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(ii) Facilities maintenance may be performed by a 
foreign contractor on a vessel as described in subparagraph 
(A) only as approved by the Secretary of the Navy.’’. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—Such section is further amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘corrective and preventive mainte-
nance or repair’ means— 
‘‘(A) maintenance or repair actions per-
formed as a result of a failure in order to return 
or restore equipment to acceptable performance 
levels; and 
‘‘(B) scheduled maintenance or repair ac-
tions to prevent or discover functional failures. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘facilities maintenance’ means 
preservation or corrosion control efforts and cleaning 
services.’’. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such sec-
tion is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 7310. Overhaul, repair, and maintenance of vessels 
in foreign shipyards and facilities: re-
strictions; exceptions’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is
488 
† HR 2810 EAS 
amended by striking the item relating to section 7310 
and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘7310. Overhaul, repair, and maintenance of vessels in foreign shipyards and fa-
cilities: restrictions; exceptions.’’. 
SEC. 1018. AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE USED VESSELS TO RE-
CAPITALIZE THE READY RESERVE FORCE 
AND 
THE 
MILITARY 
SEALIFT 
COMMAND 
SURGE FLEET. 
(a) DEPOSIT OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN NATIONAL DE-
FENSE SEALIFT FUND.— 
(1) OTHER FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE TO DEPART-
MENT OF THE NAVY.—Subsection (d) of section 2218 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) Any other funds made available to the De-
partment of the Navy for carrying out the purposes 
of the Fund set forth in subsection (c).’’. 
(2) EXPIRATION OF FUNDS AFTER 5 YEARS.— 
Subsection (g) of such section is amended by striking 
‘‘subsection (d)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1) or 
(4) of subsection (d)’’. 
(b) AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE USED VESSELS.—Sub-
section (f) of such section is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3)(A) Notwithstanding the limitations in paragraph 
(1) and subsection (c)(1)(E), the Secretary of Defense may,
489 
† HR 2810 EAS 
as part of a program to recapitalize the Ready Reserve 
Force component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet and 
the Military Sealift Command surge fleet, purchase used 
vessels, regardless of where constructed, from among vessels 
previously participating in the Maritime Security Fleet, if 
available at a reasonable cost (as determined by the Sec-
retary). If such previously participating vessels are not 
available at a reasonable cost, used vessels comparable to 
such previously participating vessels may be purchased 
from any source, regardless of where constructed, if avail-
able at a reasonable cost (as determined by the Secretary). 
‘‘(B) In exercising the authority in subparagraph (A), 
the Secretary shall purchase used vessels constructed in the 
United States, if available at a reasonable cost (as deter-
mined by the Secretary). 
‘‘(C) In exercising the authority in subparagraph (A), 
the Secretary shall ensure that any conversion, moderniza-
tion, maintenance, or repair of vessels occurs in shipyards 
located in the United States, except in emergency situations 
(as determined by the Secretary).’’. 
(c) DEFINITION OF MARITIME SECURITY FLEET.— 
Subsection (k) of such section is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
490 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(5) The term ‘Maritime Security Fleet’ means 
the fleet established under section 53102(a) of title 
46.’’. 
(d) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (i) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘(50 U.S.C. App. 1744)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘(50 U.S.C. 4405)’’. 
SEC. 1019. SURVEYING SHIPS. 
(a) SURVEYING SHIP REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 
120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Chief of Naval Operations shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report setting forth a force structure 
assessment that establishes a surveying ship requirement. 
The Chief of Naval Operations shall conduct the assessment 
for purposes of the report, and may limit the assessment 
to surveying ships. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘surveying ship’’ has the meaning 
given the term in Secretary of the Navy Instruction 
5030.8C. 
(2) The term ‘‘force structure assessment’’ has the 
meaning given the term in Chief of Naval Operations 
Instruction 3050.27.
491 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1020. PILOT PROGRAM ON FUNDING FOR NATIONAL 
DEFENSE SEALIFT VESSELS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
carry out a pilot program to assess the feasability and ad-
visability of the use of the authorities specified in subsection 
(b) in connection with research and development and oper-
ation, maintenance, and lease or charter of national defense 
sealift vessels. 
(b) AUTHORITIES.—The authorities specified in this 
subsection are authorities as follows: 
(1) To derive funds for obligations and expendi-
tures for research and development relating to na-
tional defense sealift vessels from the Research, Devel-
opment, Test, and Evaluation, Navy account. 
(2) To derive funds for obligations and expendi-
tures for operation, maintenance, and lease or charter 
of national defense sealift vessels from the Operation 
and Maintenance, Navy account. 
(3) To use funds in the account referred to in 
paragraph (1) for obligations and expenditures de-
scribed in that paragraph, and to use funds in the ac-
count referred to in paragraph (2) for obligations and 
expenditures described in that paragraph, without the 
transfer of such funds to the National Defense Sealift 
Fund.
492 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(c) LIMITATION.—The authorities in subsection (b) 
may be used under the pilot program only with respect to 
applicable amounts authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department of Defense for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. 
(d) CONTINUING AVAILABILITY OF NDSF FUNDS.— 
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the 
use of amounts available in the National Defense Sealift 
Fund for fiscal years 2018 and 2019 for use for the purposes 
of the Fund under section 2218(c) of title 10, United States 
Code, in such fiscal years. 
(e) REPORTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after 
the conclusion of the pilot program, the Secretary, the 
Commander of the United States Transportation 
Command, and the Administrator of the Maritime 
Administration each shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees an independent report on the pilot 
program. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report shall include the 
following: 
(A) A description of lessons learned from 
the pilot program regarding the efficacy of fund-
ing national defense sealift vessel requirements 
using the accounts specified in paragraphs (1)
493 
† HR 2810 EAS 
and (2) of subsection (b) rather than the Na-
tional Defense Sealift Fund. 
(B) An assessment of potential operational, 
financial, and other significant impacts if the 
pilot program is made permanent. 
(C) Such recommendations as the official 
submitting such report considers appropriate re-
garding modifications of section 2218 of title 10, 
United States Code, in light of the pilot pro-
gram. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘national defense sealift vessel’’ has 
the meaning given the term in section 2218(k)(3) of 
title 10, United States Code. 
(2) The term ‘‘National Defense Sealift Fund’’ 
means the Fund established by section 2218 of title 
10, United States Code. 
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 
SEC. 1031. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS 
FOR TRANSFER OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS 
DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STA-
TION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO THE 
UNITED STATES. 
Section 1032 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is amended
494 
† HR 2810 EAS 
by striking ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2018’’. 
SEC. 1032. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS 
TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY FACILITIES IN 
THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE DETAINEES 
TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 
Section 1033(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is amended 
by striking ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2018’’. 
SEC. 1033. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS 
FOR TRANSFER OR RELEASE TO CERTAIN 
COUNTRIES OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT 
UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTA-
NAMO BAY, CUBA. 
Section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is amended 
by striking ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2018’’.
495 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1034. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS 
FOR REALIGNMENT OF FORCES AT OR CLO-
SURE OF UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, 
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 
Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 
2391) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2017’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘any of fiscal years 2017 through 2021’’. 
SEC. 1035. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DE-
TAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, 
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO THE UNITED 
STATES TEMPORARILY FOR EMERGENCY OR 
CRITICAL MEDICAL TREATMENT. 
(a) TEMPORARY TRANSFER
FOR MEDICAL TREAT-
MENT.—Notwithstanding section 1032 of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 
114–328), as amended by section 1031 of this Act, or any 
similar provision of law enacted after September 30, 2015, 
the Secretary of Defense may, after consultation with the 
Secretary of Homeland Security, temporarily transfer an 
individual detained at Guantanamo to a Department of 
Defense medical facility in the United States for the sole 
purpose of providing the individual medical treatment if 
the Secretary of Defense determines that—
496 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) the medical treatment of the individual is 
necessary to prevent death or imminent significant 
injury or harm to the health of the individual; 
(2) the necessary medical treatment is not avail-
able to be provided at United States Naval Station, 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive 
and unreasonable costs; and 
(3) the Department of Defense has provided for 
appropriate security measures for the custody and 
control of the individual during any period in which 
the individual is temporarily in the United States 
under this section. 
(b) LIMITATION ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.—The 
authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) 
may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or another 
official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under 
Secretary of Defense or higher. 
(c) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.—An individual who is 
temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection 
(a) shall— 
(1) while in the United States, remain in the 
custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all 
times; and 
(2) be returned to United States Naval Station, 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as feasible after a
497 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Department of Defense physician determines, in con-
sultation with the Commander, Joint Task Force- 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that any necessary follow- 
up medical care may reasonably be provided the indi-
vidual at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 
Bay. 
(d) STATUS WHILE IN UNITED STATES.—An indi-
vidual who is temporarily transferred under the authority 
in subsection (a), while in the United States— 
(1) shall be deemed at all times and in all re-
spects to be in the uninterrupted custody of the Sec-
retary of Defense, as though the individual remained 
physically at United States Naval Station, Guanta-
namo Bay, Cuba; 
(2) shall not at any time be subject to, and may 
not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any 
right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any 
benefit under any provision of the immigration laws 
(as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)), or any 
other law or regulation; 
(3) shall not be permitted to avail himself of any 
right, privilege, or benefit of any law of the United 
States beyond those available to individuals detained
498 
† HR 2810 EAS 
at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay; 
and 
(4) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have 
a change in any designation that may have attached 
to that detainee while detained at United States 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, pursuant to the 
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 
107–40), as determined in accordance with applicable 
law and regulations. 
(e) NO CAUSE OF ACTION.—Any decision to transfer 
or not to transfer an individual made under the authority 
in subsection (a) shall not give rise to any claim or cause 
of action. 
(f) LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.— 
(1) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), no court, justice, or judge shall have juris-
diction to hear or consider any claim or action 
against the United States or its departments, agen-
cies, officers, employees, or agents arising from or re-
lating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treat-
ment, or conditions of confinement of an individual 
transferred under this section. 
(2) EXCEPTION
FOR
HABEAS
CORPUS.—The 
United States District Court for the District of Co-
lumbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction to consider an
499 
† HR 2810 EAS 
application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release 
from custody filed by or on behalf of an individual 
who is in the United States pursuant to a temporary 
transfer under the authority in subsection (a). Such 
jurisdiction shall be limited to that required by the 
Constitution, and relief shall be only as provided in 
paragraph (3). In such a proceeding the court may 
not review, halt, or stay the return of the individual 
who is the object of the application to United States 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to 
subsection (c). 
(3) RELIEF.—A court order in a proceeding cov-
ered by paragraph (2)— 
(A) may not order the release of the indi-
vidual within the United States; and 
(B) shall be limited to an order of release 
from custody which, when final, the Secretary of 
Defense shall implement in accordance with sec-
tion 1034 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 801 note). 
(g) NOTIFICATION.—Whenever a temporary transfer of 
an individual detained at Guantanamo is made under the 
authority of subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 
notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
500 
† HR 2810 EAS 
the House of Representatives of the transfer not later than 
five days after the date on which the transfer is made. 
(h) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED
AT GUANTANAMO DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘individual detained at 
Guantanamo’’ means an individual located at United 
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of Octo-
ber 1, 2009, who— 
(1) is not a national of the United States (as de-
fined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)) or a member 
of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 
(2) is— 
(A) in the custody or under the control of 
the Department of Defense; or 
(B) otherwise detained at United States 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. 
(i) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to an in-
dividual temporarily transferred under the authority in 
subsection (a) regardless of the status of any pending or 
completed proceeding or detention on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act.
501 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Subtitle E—Miscellaneous 
Authorities and Limitations 
SEC. 1041. MATTERS RELATING TO THE SUBMITTAL OF FU-
TURE-YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAMS. 
(a) TIMING OF SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Subsection 
(a) of section 221 of title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘at or about the same time’’ and inserting 
‘‘not later than five days after the date on which’’. 
(b) MANNER AND FORM OF SUBMITTAL.—Such section 
is further amended— 
(1) in subsection (a) by inserting ‘‘make avail-
able to United States Government entities and’’ before 
‘‘submit to Congress’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary of Defense shall make available 
to United States Government entities and submit to Con-
gress each future-years defense program under this section 
as follows: 
‘‘(A) By making such program available on an 
Internet website of the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) available to United States Government 
in the form of an unclassified electronic database. 
‘‘(B) By delivering printed copies of such pro-
gram to the congressional defense committee.
502 
† HR 2810 EAS 
‘‘(2) In the event inclusion of classified material in 
a future-years defense program would otherwise render the 
totality of the program classified for purposes of this sub-
section— 
‘‘(A) such program shall be made available to 
United States Government entities and submitted to 
Congress in unclassified form, with such material at-
tached as a classified annex; and 
‘‘(B) such annex shall be submitted to the con-
gressional defense committees, the Congressional 
Budget Office, the Comptroller General of the United 
States, and the Congressional Research Service.’’. 
(c) ACCURACY OF INFORMATION.—Such section is fur-
ther amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(e) Each future-years defense program under this sub-
section shall be accompanied by a certification by the Under 
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in the case of the De-
partment of Defense, and the comptroller of each military 
department, in the case of such military department, that 
any information entered into the Standard Data Collection 
System of the Department of Defense, the Comptroller Infor-
mation System, or any other data system, as applicable, 
for purposes of assembling such future-years defense pro-
gram was accurate.’’.
503 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of sec-
tion 221 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 221. Future-years defense program: consistency in 
budgeting; availability to United States 
Government entities and submittal to Con-
gress’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended 
by striking the item relating to section 221 and in-
serting the following new item: 
‘‘221. Future-years defense program: consistency in budgeting; availability to 
United States Government entities and submittal to Congress.’’. 
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and shall apply to future-years defense programs sub-
mitted at the time of budgets of the President for fiscal years 
beginning after fiscal year 2018. 
(f) DOD GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall, 
in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), update Department of Defense Financial 
Management Regulation 7000.14–R, and any other appro-
priate instructions and guidance, to ensure that the Depart-
ment of Defense takes appropriate actions to comply with 
the amendments made by this section in the submittal of
504 
† HR 2810 EAS 
future-years defense programs in calendar years after cal-
endar year 2017. 
SEC. 1042. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTEGRATION OF IN-
FORMATION 
OPERATIONS 
AND 
CYBER-EN-
ABLED INFORMATION OPERATIONS. 
(a) INTEGRATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IN-
FORMATION OPERATIONS AND CYBER-ENABLED INFORMA-
TION OPERATIONS.— 
(1) 
ESTABLISHMENT
OF
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL 
TASK FORCE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall establish a cross-functional task force con-
sistent with section 911(c)(1) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 
(114–328; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) to integrate 
across the organizations of the Department of 
Defense responsible for information operations, 
military deception, public affairs, electronic war-
fare, and cyber operations to produce integrated 
strategy, planning, and budgeting to counter, 
deter, and conduct strategic information oper-
ations and cyber-enabled information operations. 
(B) DUTIES.—The task force shall carry out 
the following:
505 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(i) Development of a strategic frame-
work for the conduct by the Department of 
Defense of information operations, includ-
ing cyber-enabled information operations, 
coordinated across all relevant Department 
of Defense entities, including both near-term 
and long-term guidance for the conduct of 
such coordinated operations. 
(ii) Development and dissemination of 
a common operating paradigm across the 
organizations specified in subparagraph (A) 
of the influence, deception, and propaganda 
activities of key malign actors, including in 
cyberspace. 
(iii) Development of guidance for, and 
promotion of, the liaison capability of the 
Department to interact with the private sec-
tor, including social media, on matters re-
lated to the influence activities of malign 
actors. 
(2) HEAD OF CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TASK FORCE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall appoint as the head of the task force such 
individual as the Secretary considers appro-
priate from among individuals serving in the
506 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Department as an Under Secretary of Defense or 
in such other position within the Department of 
lesser order of precedence. 
(B) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The responsibil-
ities of the head of the task force are as follows: 
(i) Oversight of strategic policy and 
guidance. 
(ii) Overall resource allocation for the 
integration of information operations and 
cyber operations of the Department. 
(iii) Ensuring the task force faithfully 
pursues the purpose set forth in subpara-
graph (A) of paragraph (1) and carries out 
its duties as set forth in subparagraph (B) 
of such paragraph. 
(iv) Carrying out such activities as are 
required of the head of the task force under 
subsections (b) and (c). 
(b) REQUIREMENTS AND PLANS FOR INFORMATION 
OPERATIONS.— 
(1) COMBATANT COMMAND PLANNING.—The Sec-
retary shall require each commander of a combatant 
command to develop such requirements and specific 
plans as may be necessary for the conduct of informa-
tion operations, including plans for deterring infor-
507 
† HR 2810 EAS 
mation operations, particularly in the cyber domain, 
by malign actors against the United States, allies of 
the United States, and interests of the United States. 
(2) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE STRATEGY FOR OPERATIONS IN THE INFOR-
MATION ENVIRONMENT.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
head of the task force shall— 
(i) review the Department of Defense 
Strategy for Operations in the Information 
Environment, dated June 2016; and 
(ii) submit to the congressional defense 
committees a plan for implementation of 
such strategy. 
(B) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan 
shall include, at a minimum, the following: 
(i) An accounting of the efforts under-
taken in support of the strategy described in 
subparagraph (A)(i) since it was issued in 
June 2016. 
(ii) A description of any updates or 
changes to such strategy that have been 
made since it was first issued, as well as
508 
† HR 2810 EAS 
any expected updates or changes in light of 
the establishment of the task force. 
(iii) A description of the role of the De-
partment as part of a broader whole-of-gov-
ernment strategy for strategic communica-
tions, including assumptions about the roles 
and contributions of other Government de-
partments and agencies to such a strategy. 
(iv) 
Defined 
actions, 
performance 
metrics, and projected timelines to achieve 
the following specified tasks: 
(I) Train, educate, and prepare 
commanders and their staffs, and the 
Joint Force as a whole, to lead, man-
age, and conduct operations in the in-
formation environment. 
(II) Train, educate, and prepare 
information operations professionals 
and practitioners to enable effective op-
erations in the information environ-
ment. 
(III) Manage information oper-
ations professionals, practitioners, and 
organizations to meet emerging oper-
ational needs.
509 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(IV) Establish a baseline assess-
ment of current ability of the Depart-
ment to conduct operations in the in-
formation environment, including an 
identification of the types of units and 
organizations currently responsible for 
building and employing information- 
related capabilities and an assignment 
of appropriate roles and missions for 
each type of unit or organization. 
(V) Develop the ability of the De-
partment and operating forces to en-
gage, assess, characterize, forecast, and 
visualize the information environment. 
(VI) Develop and maintain the 
proper capabilities and capacity to op-
erate effectively in the information en-
vironment in coordination with imple-
mentation of related cyber and other 
strategies. 
(VII) Develop and maintain the 
capability to assess accurately the ef-
fect of operations in the information 
environment.
510 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(VIII) Adopt, adapt, and develop 
new science and technology for the De-
partment to operate effectively in the 
information environment. 
(IX) Develop and adapt informa-
tion 
environment-related 
concepts, 
policies, and guidance. 
(X) Ensure doctrine relevant to 
operations in the information environ-
ment remains current and responsive 
based on lessons learned and best prac-
tices. 
(XI) Develop, update, and de-con-
flict authorities and permissions, as 
appropriate, to enable effective oper-
ations in the information environment. 
(XII) Establish and maintain 
partnerships among Department and 
interagency partners to enable more ef-
fective whole-of-government operations 
in the information environment. 
(XIII) Establish and maintain 
appropriate interaction with entities 
that are not part of the Federal Gov-
ernment, including entities in indus-
511 
† HR 2810 EAS 
try, entities in academia, Federally 
funded research and development cen-
ters, and other organizations, to enable 
operations in the information environ-
ment. 
(XIV) Establish and maintain 
collaboration between and among the 
Department and international part-
ners, including partner countries and 
nongovernmental organizations, to en-
able more effective operations in the in-
formation environment. 
(XV) Foster, enhance, and lever-
age partnership capabilities and ca-
pacities. 
(v) An analysis of any personnel, 
resourcing, capability, authority, or other 
gaps that will need to be addressed to en-
sure effective implementation of the strategy 
described in subparagraph (A)(i) across all 
relevant elements of the Department. 
(vi) An investment framework and 
projected timeline for addressing any gaps 
identified under clause (v).
512 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(vii) Such other matters as the Sec-
retary of Defense considers relevant. 
(C) PERIODIC STATUS REPORTS.—Not later 
than 90 days after the date on which the imple-
mentation plan is submitted under subpara-
graph (A)(ii) and not less frequently than once 
every 90 days thereafter until the date that is 
three years after the date of such submittal, the 
head of the task force shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report describing the 
status of the efforts of the Department to accom-
plish the tasks specified under clauses (iv) and 
(vi) of subparagraph (B). 
(c) TRAINING AND EDUCATION.—Consistent with the 
elements of the implementation plan required under clauses 
(i) and (ii) of subsection (b)(2)(B)(4), the head of the task 
force shall establish programs to provide training and edu-
cation to such members of the Armed Forces and civilian 
employees of the Department of Defense as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to ensure understanding of the role 
of information in warfare, the central goal of all military 
operations to affect the perceptions, views, and decision- 
making of adversaries, and the effective management and 
conduct of operations in the information environment.
513 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(d) ESTABLISHMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE OF-
FICER FOR INFORMATION OPERATIONS AND CYBER OPER-
ATIONS.—The Secretary shall establish a position within 
the Department of Defense known as the ‘‘Defense Intel-
ligence Officer for Information Operations and Cyber Oper-
ations’’. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘head of the task force’’ means the 
head appointed under subsection (a)(2)(A). 
(2) The term ‘‘implementation plan’’ means the 
plan required by subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii). 
(3) The term ‘‘task force’’ means the cross-func-
tional 
task 
force 
established 
under 
subsection 
(a)(1)(A). 
SEC. 1043. PROHIBITION ON LOBBYING ACTIVITIES WITH 
RESPECT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
BY 
CERTAIN 
OFFICERS 
OF 
THE 
ARMED 
FORCES AND CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE 
DEPARTMENT WITHIN TWO YEARS OF SEPA-
RATION FROM MILITARY SERVICE OR EM-
PLOYMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT. 
(a) PROHIBITION.—An individual described in sub-
section (b) may not engage in lobbying activities with re-
spect to the Department of Defense during the two-year pe-
riod beginning on the date of retirement or separation from
514 
† HR 2810 EAS 
service in the Armed Forces or the date of retirement or 
separation from service with the Department, as applicable. 
(b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—An individual described 
in this section is the following: 
(1) An officer of the Armed Forces in grade O– 
7 or higher at the time of retirement or separation 
from the Armed Forces. 
(2) A civilian employee of the Department of De-
fense at the Senior Executive Service (SES) level or 
higher at the time of retirement or separation from 
service with the Department. 
(c) LOBBYING ACTIVITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFINED.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘lobbying activities with respect to 
the Department of Defense’’ means the following: 
(A) Lobbying contacts and other lobbying 
activities with covered executive branch officials 
and covered legislative branch officials with re-
spect to the Department of Defense. 
(B) Lobbying contacts with covered execu-
tive branch officials described in subparagraphs 
(C) through (F) of section 3(3) of the Lobbying 
Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602(3)) in the 
Department of Defense.
515 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) The term ‘‘lobbying activities’’ has the mean-
ing given that term in section 3(7) of the Lobbying 
Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602(7)). 
(3) The term ‘‘covered executive branch official’’ 
has the meaning given that term in section 3(3) of the 
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602(3)). 
(4) The term ‘‘covered legislative branch official’’ 
has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of the 
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602(4)). 
SEC. 1044. DEFINITION OF ‘‘UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE’’ 
FOR PURPOSES OF TITLE 10, UNITED STATES 
CODE. 
Section 101(e) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(6) UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLE.—The term 
‘unmanned aerial vehicle’— 
‘‘(A) means an aerial vehicle that is not 
controlled by a human being after launch, such 
as a cruise missile; and 
‘‘(B) does not include a remotely piloted 
aerial vehicle if the vehicle is controlled by a 
human being after launch.’’.
516 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1045. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO MANAGE-
MENT OF MILITARY TECHNICIANS. 
Section 1053(a)(1) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 10216 note) is 
amended by striking ‘‘20 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘12.6 per-
cent’’. 
SEC. 1046. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS 
FOR 
RETIREMENT 
OF 
LEGACY 
MARITIME 
MINE COUNTERMEASURE PLATFORMS. 
Section 1045(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is amended 
in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘author-
ized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made avail-
able for fiscal year 2017 for the Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘au-
thorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
the Navy for fiscal year 2017 or 2018’’. 
SEC. 1047. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE BASING OF KC–46A 
AIRCRAFT 
OUTSIDE 
THE 
CONTINENTAL 
UNITED STATES. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Department of 
Defense is continuing its process of permanently stationing 
KC–46A aircraft at installations in the continental United 
States (CONUS) and forward-basing outside the conti-
nental United States (OCONUS). 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that the Secretary of the Air Force, as part of the strategic
517 
† HR 2810 EAS 
basing process for KC–46A aircraft, should continue to 
place emphasis on and consider the benefits derived from 
locations outside the continental United States that— 
(1) support day-to-day air refueling operations, 
operations plans of the combatant commands, and 
flexibility for contingency operations, and have— 
(A) a strategic location that is essential to 
the defense of the United States and its interests; 
(B) receivers for boom or probe-and-drogue 
training opportunities with joint and inter-
national partners; and 
(C) sufficient airfield and airspace avail-
ability and capacity to meet requirements; and 
(2) possess facilities that— 
(A) take full advantage of existing infra-
structure to provide— 
(i) runway, hangars, and aircrew and 
maintenance operations; and 
(ii) sufficient fuels receipt, storage, and 
distribution capacities for a 5-day peace-
time operating stock; and 
(B) minimize overall construction and oper-
ational costs.
518 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1048. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCURE UP TO SIX POLAR- 
CLASS ICEBREAKERS. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO PROCURE ICEBREAKERS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the depart-
ment in which the Coast Guard is operating may, in 
consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, enter 
into a contract or contracts for the procurement of up 
to six polar-class icebreakers, including— 
(A) polar-class heavy icebreakers; and 
(B) polar-class medium icebreakers. 
(2) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAY-
MENTS.—A contract entered into under paragraph (1) 
shall provide that any obligation of the United States 
to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal 
year after fiscal year 2018 is subject to the avail-
ability of appropriations or funds for that purpose for 
such later fiscal year. 
(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 
REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 
General of the United States shall submit to the Com-
mittees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
House of Representatives, the Committee on Com-
merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, 
and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc-
519 
† HR 2810 EAS 
ture of the House of Representatives a report assessing 
the cost and procurement schedule for new United 
States icebreakers. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required in para-
graph (1) shall include an analysis of the following: 
(A) The current status of the efforts of the 
Coast Guard to acquire new icebreaking capa-
bility, including coordination through the Inte-
grated Program Office. 
(B) Actions being taken by the Coast Guard 
to incorporate key practices from other nations 
that procure icebreakers to increase knowledge 
and reduce costs and risks. 
(C) The extent by which the cost and sched-
ule for building Coast Guard icebreakers differs 
from those in other countries, if known. 
(D) The extent that innovative acquisition 
practices (such as multiyear funding and block 
buys) may be applied to icebreaker acquisition to 
reduce the cost and accelerate the schedule. 
(E) A capacity replacement plan to miti-
gate a potential icebreaker capability gap if the 
Polar Star cannot remain in service. 
(F) Any other matters the Comptroller Gen-
eral considers appropriate.
520 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1049. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF TEST SITES 
FOR 
RESEARCH 
AND 
DEVELOPMENT 
ON 
COUNTERING 
UNMANNED 
AIRCRAFT 
SYS-
TEMS. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the armed unmanned aircraft systems de-
ployed by adversaries for military purposes pose a 
threat to military installations, critical infrastruc-
ture, and members of the Armed Forces in conflict 
areas like Iraq and Syria; 
(2) the unmanned aircraft systems test sites des-
ignated by the Federal Aviation Administration offer 
unique capabilities, expertise, and airspace for re-
search and development related to unmanned aircraft 
systems; and 
(3) the Armed Forces should, as appropriate and 
to the extent practicable, seek to leverage the test sites 
described in paragraph (2), as well as existing De-
partment of Defense facilities with appropriate exper-
tise, for research and development on capabilities to 
counter the nefarious use of unmanned aircraft sys-
tems. 
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports 
SEC. 1061. ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL FORCE POSTURE. 
(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of De-
fense shall, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint
521 
† HR 2810 EAS 
Chiefs of Staff and the commanders of the combatant com-
mands, provide for and oversee an assessment of the global 
force posture of the Armed Forces. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than the earlier of 180 days 
after the production of the 2018 National Defense Strategy 
(which is intended to be closely coordinated with and com-
plementary to a new National Security Strategy) or Decem-
ber 31, 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees 
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Rep-
resentatives a report on the assessment required by sub-
section (a). The report shall include the following: 
(1) Recommendations for force size, structure, 
and basing in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Pa-
cific that reflect and complement the force sizing con-
struct included in the 2018 National Defense Strategy 
in order to guide the growth of the force structure of 
the Armed Forces, which recommendations shall be 
based on an evaluation of the relative costs of rota-
tional and forward-based forces as well as impacts to 
deployment timelines of threats to lines of commu-
nication and anti-access area denial capabilities of 
potential adversaries. 
(2) An assessment by each commander of a geo-
graphic combatant command of the capability and 
force structure gaps within the context of an evalua-
522 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tion of the potential threats in the theater of oper-
ations of the combatant command concerned and the 
operation plans that such combatant command are 
expected to execute. 
(3) An evaluation of the concept of operations 
and the sources of manpower for headquarters re-
quired to oversee and direct execution of current oper-
ations plans. 
SEC. 1062. ARMY MODERNIZATION STRATEGY. 
(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 
Army shall develop a modernization strategy for the total 
Army. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection 
(a) shall include the following: 
(1) A comprehensive description of the future 
total Army, including key objectives, war fighting 
challenges, and risks, sufficient to establish require-
ments, set priorities, identify opportunity costs, and 
establish acquisition time lines for the total Army 
over a period beyond the period of the current future- 
years defense program under section 221 of title 10, 
United States Code. 
(2) Mechanisms for identifying programs of the 
Army that may be unnecessary, or do not perform ac-
523 
† HR 2810 EAS 
cording to expectations, in achieving the future total 
Army. 
(3) A comprehensive description of the manner 
in which the future total Army intends to fight and 
win as part of a joint force engaged in combat across 
all operational domains. 
(4) A comprehensive description of the mecha-
nisms required by the future total Army to maintain 
command, 
control, 
and 
communications 
and 
sustainment. 
(c) PARTICULAR CONSIDERATIONS.—In developing the 
strategy required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall take 
into particular account the following: 
(1) Current trends and developments in weapons 
and equipment technologies. 
(2) New tactics and force design of peer adver-
saries, including the rapid pace of development of 
such tactics and force design by such adversaries. 
(d) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
the strategy required by subsection (a).
524 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) FORM.—If the report is submitted in classi-
fied form, the report shall be accompanied by an un-
classified summary. 
SEC. 1063. REPORT ON ARMY PLAN TO IMPROVE OPER-
ATIONAL UNIT READINESS BY REDUCING 
NUMBER OF NON-DEPLOYABLE SOLDIERS AS-
SIGNED TO OPERATIONAL UNITS. 
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the plans of 
the Army to improve operational unit readiness in the 
Army by reducing the number of non-deployable soldiers 
assigned to operational units of the Army and replacing 
such soldiers with soldiers capable of world-wide deploy-
ment. 
SEC. 1064. EFFORTS TO COMBAT PHYSIOLOGICAL EPISODES 
ON CERTAIN NAVY AIRCRAFT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days there-
after until January 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy shall 
provide to the congressional defense committees information 
on efforts by the Navy’s Physiological Episode Team to com-
bat the prevalence of physiological episodes in F/A–18 Hor-
net and Super Hornet, EA–18G Growler, and T–45 Gos-
hawk aircraft.
525 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The information required under sub-
section (a) shall include the following elements: 
(1) A description of Naval Aviation Enterprise 
activities addressing physiological episodes during the 
reporting period. 
(2) An estimate of funding expended in support 
of the activities described under paragraph (1). 
(3) A description of any planned or executed 
changes to Physiological Episode Team structure or 
processes. 
(4) A description of activities planned for the 
upcoming two quarters. 
(c) FORM.—The information required under subsection 
(a) may be provided in a written report or a briefing. 
SEC. 1065. STUDIES ON AIRCRAFT INVENTORIES FOR THE 
AIR FORCE. 
(a) INDEPENDENT STUDIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
provide for the performance of three independent stud-
ies of alternative aircraft inventories through 2030, 
and an associated force-sizing construct, for the Air 
Force. 
(2) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 
March 1, 2019, the Secretary shall submit the results 
of each study to the congressional defense committees.
526 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(3) FORM.—The result of each study shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classi-
fied annex. 
(b) ENTITIES TO PERFORM STUDIES.—The Secretary 
shall provide for the studies under subsection (a) to be per-
formed as follows: 
(1) One study shall be performed by the Sec-
retary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Di-
rector of the Office of Net Assessment. 
(2) One study shall be performed by a federally 
funded research and development center. 
(3) One study shall be conducted by an inde-
pendent, nongovernmental institute which is described 
in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) 
of such Code, and has recognized credentials and ex-
pertise in national security and military affairs. 
(c) PERFORMANCE OF STUDIES.— 
(1) INDEPENDENT
PERFORMANCE.—The Sec-
retary shall require the studies under this section to 
be conducted independently of one another. 
(2) MATTERS
TO
BE
CONSIDERED.—In per-
forming a study under this section, the organization 
performing the study, while being aware of current 
and projected aircraft inventories for the Air Force,
527 
† HR 2810 EAS 
shall not be limited by such current or projected air-
craft inventories, and shall consider the following 
matters: 
(A) The national security and national de-
fense strategies of the United States. 
(B) Potential future threats to the United 
States and to United States air and space forces 
through 2030. 
(C) Traditional roles and missions of the 
Air Force. 
(D) Alternative roles and missions for the 
Air Force. 
(E) The force-sizing methodology and ra-
tionale used to calculated aircraft inventory lev-
els. 
(F) Other government and nongovernment 
analyses that would contribute to the study 
through variations in study assumptions or po-
tential scenarios. 
(G) The role of evolving technology on fu-
ture air forces, including unmanned and space 
systems. 
(H) Opportunities for reduced operation 
and sustainment costs.
528 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(I) Current and projected capabilities of 
other Armed Forces that could affect force struc-
ture capability and capacity requirements of the 
Air Force. 
(d) STUDY RESULTS.—The results of each study under 
this section shall— 
(1) identify a force-sizing construct for the Air 
Force that connects national security strategy to air-
craft inventories; 
(2) present the alternative aircraft inventories 
considered, with assumptions and possible scenarios 
identified for each; 
(3) provide for presentation of minority views of 
study participants; and 
(4) for the recommended inventories, provide— 
(A) the numbers and types of aircraft, the 
numbers and types of manned and unmanned 
aircraft, and the basic capabilities of each of 
such platforms; 
(B) describe the force-sizing rationale used 
to arrive at the recommended inventory levels; 
(C) other information needed to understand 
the aircraft inventories in basic form and the 
supporting analysis; and
529 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(D) options to address aircraft types whose 
retirement commences before 2030. 
SEC. 1066. PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTER-
AGENCY VETTING OF FOREIGN INVESTMENTS 
WITH POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON NATIONAL DE-
FENSE AND NATIONAL SECURITY. 
(a) PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRED.—The 
Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Sec-
retary of State and the Secretary of Treasury, assess and 
develop a plan, and recommendations for agencies of the 
United States Government other than the Department of 
Defense, to improve the effectiveness of interagency vetting 
of foreign investments that could potentially impair both 
the national security of the United States and the ability 
of the Department to defend the nation, specifically invest-
ments from nations that pose threats to the national secu-
rity interests of the United States. 
(b) OBJECTIVES.—The assessment, plan, and rec-
ommendations required by subsection (a) shall have the fol-
lowing objectives: 
(1) To increase collaboration and coordination 
among the Department of Defense and other agencies 
of the United States Government, including the Direc-
tor of National Intelligence, in the identification and 
prevention of foreign investments that could poten-
530 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tially impair the national security of the United 
States and the ability of the Department to defend the 
nation. 
(2) To increase collaboration and cooperation 
among the United States Government and govern-
ments of United States allies and partners on invest-
ments described in paragraph (1), including through 
information sharing. 
(3) To restrict investments described in para-
graph (1) by countries of special concern in critical 
technologies and emerging technologies that are 
foundational for maintaining the United States tech-
nological advantage. 
(c) ANALYSIS OF ISSUES.—The plan and recommenda-
tions required by subsection (a) shall be based upon the re-
sults of an analysis of issues as follows: 
(1) Whether the current interagency vetting proc-
esses and policies place adequate focus on the country 
of origin of each transaction, particularly when it is 
a country of special concern, and whether certain 
transactions emanating from those countries should be 
presumed to pose certain risks to the ability of the 
Department to defend the nation. 
(2) What are the current or projected major 
vulnerabilities of the Department pertaining to for-
531 
† HR 2810 EAS 
eign investment, including in the areas of cybersecu-
rity, reliance on foreign suppliers in the supply chain 
for defense equipment, limitations on access to certain 
materials that are essential for national defense, and 
the use of transportation assets and other critical in-
frastructure for training, mobilizing, and deploying 
forces. 
(3) Whether the current interagency vetting proc-
ess for foreign investments— 
(A) requires additional resources in order to 
be effective; 
(B) permits the Department adequate time 
to thoroughly review transactions to conduct na-
tional security threat assessments and also deter-
mine the impacts of transactions on national de-
fense; 
(C) adequately takes into account risks to 
the ability of the Department to defend the na-
tion posed by transactions before attempting to 
mitigate them in various ways; and 
(D) provides adequate monitoring and com-
pliance of agreements to mitigate such risks. 
(4) Whether other agencies of the United States 
Government, including the Department of the Inte-
rior, are aware of the counterintelligence risks posed
532 
† HR 2810 EAS 
to facilities of the Department by purchases or leases 
of nearby Federal land and are cooperative in pro-
viding information to permit a proper assessment of 
those risks. 
(5) Whether and to what extent industrial espio-
nage is occurring against private United States com-
panies to obtain commercial secrets related to critical 
or foundational technologies. 
(6) Whether and to what extent future foreign in-
vestments have the potential for any of the following: 
(A) To increase the cost to the Department 
of acquiring or maintaining necessary defense- 
related equipment and systems. 
(B) To reduce the United States techno-
logical and industrial advantage relative to any 
country of special concern. 
(C) To give any country of special concern 
a heightened ability to conduct information war-
fare against the United States, including through 
the spread false or misleading information to the 
American public and the manipulation of Amer-
ican public opinion on critical public policy 
issues.
533 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(7) Whether currently mandated annual reports 
to Congress on the interagency vetting of foreign in-
vestments provide valuable information. 
(d) ELEMENTS.—The elements of the assessment, plan, 
and recommendations required by subsection (a) shall in-
clude the following: 
(1) A list of countries of special concern for in-
vestments that could potentially impair the ability of 
the Department to defend the nation. 
(2) A description of recent trends in foreign in-
vestment transactions by countries of special concern, 
including joint ventures, the sale of assets pursuant to 
bankruptcy, and the purchase or lease of real estate 
in proximity to military installations. 
(3) A description of any strategies used by coun-
tries of special concern to exploit vulnerabilities in 
existing foreign investment vetting processes and reg-
ulations. 
(4) An assessment of any market distortion or 
unfair competition by any country of special concern 
that directly or indirectly impairs the national secu-
rity or the United States and the ability of the De-
partment to defend the nation. 
(e) REPORTS.—
534 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(1) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Rep-
resentatives a report on the progress of the Secretary 
in developing the plan and recommendations required 
by subsection (a). 
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary shall submit to the committees of Congress re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) a report setting forth the 
plan and recommendations developed pursuant to 
subsection (a). 
(3) FORM.—Each report under this subsection 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex. 
SEC. 1067. REPORT ON AUTHORITIES FOR THE EMPLOY-
MENT, 
USE, 
AND 
STATUS 
OF 
NATIONAL 
GUARD AND RESERVE TECHNICIANS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 2018, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives a report setting forth the results of a review, under-
taken by the Secretary for purposes of the report, of the fol-
lowing:
536 
† HR 2810 EAS 
sult with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, the Chief 
of Army Reserve, the Chief of Air Force Reserve, and rep-
resentatives of National Guard and Reserve technicians (in-
cluding collective bargaining representatives of such techni-
cians). 
(d) INCLUSION
OF RECENT AUTHORITIES
IN RE-
VIEW.—The Secretary shall ensure that the review required 
pursuant to subsection (a) takes into account authorities, 
and modifications of authorities, for the employment, use, 
and status of National Guard and Reserve technicians in 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2016 (Public Law 114–92) and the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328). 
(e) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—In meeting the purposes 
of the review as set forth in subsection (b), the review re-
quired pursuant to subsection (a) shall address, in par-
ticular, the following: 
(1) The extent to which National Guard and Re-
serve technicians are assigned military duties incon-
sistent with, or of a different nature than, their civil-
ian duties, the impact of such assignments on unit 
readiness, and the effect of such assignments on the 
career progression of technicians. 
(2) The use by the Department of Defense (espe-
cially within the National Guard) of selective reten-
537 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tion boards to separate National Guard and Reserve 
technicians from military service (with the effect of 
thereby separating them from civilian service) before 
they accrue a full, unreduced retirement annuity in 
connection with Federal civilian service, and whether 
that use is consistent with the authority in section 
10216(f) of title 10, United States Code, that techni-
cians be permitted to remain in service past their 
mandatory separation date until they qualify for an 
unreduced retirement annuity. 
(3) The feasibility and advisability of extending 
eligibility for benefits under the TRICARE program 
to National Guard and Reserve technicians, including 
the types, if any, of benefits whose extension would be 
feasible and advisable. 
(4) The impact on recruitment and retention, 
and the budgetary impact, of permitting National 
Guard and Reserve technicians who receive an enlist-
ment incentive before becoming a technician to retain 
such incentive upon becoming a technician. 
(f) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report required by sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) The results of the review undertaken pursu-
ant to subsection (a), including on the matters set 
forth in subsections (b) and (e).
538 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(2) Such recommendations for legislative or ad-
ministrative action as the Secretary considers appro-
priate in light of the review in order to improve and 
enhance the employment, use, and status of National 
Guard and Reserve technicians. 
SEC. 1068. CONFORMING REPEALS AND TECHNICAL AMEND-
MENTS IN CONNECTION WITH REPORTS OF 
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WHOSE SUB-
MITTAL 
TO 
CONGRESS 
HAS 
PREVIOUSLY 
BEEN TERMINATED BY LAW. 
(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, 
United States Code, is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 113(c) is amended— 
(A) by striking paragraph (2); 
(B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; and 
(C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), re-
spectively. 
(2) Section 113 is further amended by striking 
subsection (l). 
(3)(A) Section 115a is repealed. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 2 is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 115a.
539 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(4) Section 386(c)(1) is amended by striking 
‘‘331,’’. 
(5)(A) Section 235 is repealed. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 9 is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 235. 
(6) Section 428 is amended by striking sub-
section (f). 
(7) Section 974(d) is amended by striking para-
graph (3). 
(8) Section 1073b is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (a); and 
(B) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) 
as subsections (a) and (b), respectively. 
(9) Section 1597 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (c); 
(B) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), 
and (f) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respec-
tively; and 
(C) in subsection (c), as redesignated by 
subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or a master plan 
prepared under subsection (c)’’. 
(10) Section 1705 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (f); and
540 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(B) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) 
as subsections (f) and (g), respectively. 
(11) Section 1722b is amended by striking sub-
section (c). 
(12) Section 1781b is amended by striking sub-
section (d). 
(13) Section 2193b is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (g); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub-
section (g). 
(14) Section 2262 is amended by striking sub-
section (d). 
(15) Section 2263 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (b); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub-
section (b). 
(16)(A) Section 2277 is repealed. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 135 is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 2277. 
(17) Section 2306b(l) is amended— 
(A) by striking paragraphs (4) and (5); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), 
(8), and (9) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), and 
(7), respectively.
541 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(18)(A) Section 2313a is repealed. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 137 is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 2313a. 
(19) Section 2330a is amended by striking sub-
section (c). 
(20) Section 2350j is amended by striking sub-
section (f). 
(21) Section 2410i(c) is amended by striking the 
second sentence. 
(22) Section 2475 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (a); and 
(B) by striking ‘‘(b) NOTIFICATION OF DE-
CISION TO EXECUTE PLAN.—’’. 
(23) Section 2506 is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(a) DEPARTMENTAL GUID-
ANCE.—’’; and 
(B) by striking subsection (b). 
(24) Section 2537 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (b); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub-
section (b). 
(25) Section 2564 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (e); and
542 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(B) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) 
as subsection (e) and (f), respectively. 
(26) Section 2831 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (e); 
(B) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub-
section (e); and 
(C) in subsection (e), as so redesignated— 
(i) by striking ‘‘(1) Except as provided 
in paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary’’ 
and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’; 
(ii) by striking paragraphs (2) and 
(3); and 
(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs 
(A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), re-
spectively. 
(27) Section 2859 is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (c); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (c). 
(28) Section 2861 is amended by striking sub-
section (d). 
(29) Section 2866(b) is amended by striking 
paragraph (3). 
(30) Section 2912 is amended by striking sub-
section (d).
543 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(31)(A) Section 4316 is repealed. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 401 is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 4316. 
(32) Section 5144(d) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Com-
mander’’; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (2). 
(33) Section 10504 is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(a) ANNUAL REPORT.—’’; 
and 
(B) by striking subsection (b). 
(b) TITLE 32, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 509 of 
title 32, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (k); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (l) and (m) as 
subsections (k) and (l), respectively. 
(c) TITLE
5, UNITED
STATES
CODE.—Section 
9902(f)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 
(2) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C). 
(d) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, 
1985.—Section 1003 of the Department of Defense Author-
ization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98–525; 22 U.S.C. 1928 
note) is amended by striking subsections (c) and (d).
544 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(e) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL 
YEAR 1989.—Subsection (b) of section 1009 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989 (Public Law 
100–456; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note) is repealed. 
(f) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEARS 1990 AND 1991.—Section 211 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 
1991 (Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1394) is amended 
by striking subsection (e). 
(g) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 1991.—Section 1518 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101– 
510; 24 U.S.C. 418) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘Congress 
and’’ in the second sentence; and 
(2) in subsection (e)— 
(A) by striking paragraph (2); 
(B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Not later 
than’’; and 
(C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 
and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively. 
(h) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 1994.—Section 1603 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–
545 
† HR 2810 EAS 
160; 22 U.S.C. 2751 note) is amended by striking subsection 
(d). 
(i) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 1995.—Section 533 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103– 
337; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is repealed. 
(j) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2000.—Section 366 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106– 
65; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking subsection 
(f). 
(k) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2002.—The National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107) is amended 
as follows: 
(1) Section 346 (115 Stat. 1062) is amended— 
(A) by striking subsections (b) and (c); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (b). 
(2) Section 1008(d) (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is 
amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘On each’’; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (2). 
(l) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2003.—Section 817 of the Bob Stump Na-
546 
† HR 2810 EAS 
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub-
lic Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (d); and 
(2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection 
(d). 
(m) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2004.—Section 1022 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108– 
136; 10 U.S.C. 271 note) is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (c); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 
subsections (c) and (d), respectively. 
(n) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2006.—The National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) is amended 
as follows: 
(1) Section 123 (119 Stat. 3157) is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (d); and 
(B) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub-
section (d). 
(2) Section 218(c) (119 Stat. 3171) is amended 
by striking paragraph (3). 
(3) Section 1224 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is re-
pealed.
547 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(o) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Section 357 of the John Warner Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Pub-
lic Law 109–364; 22 U.S.C. 4865 note) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(a) RECONCILIATION
RE-
QUIRED.—’’; and 
(2) by striking subsection (b). 
(p) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2008.—The National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended 
as follows: 
(1) Section 328 (10 U.S.C. 4544 note) is amend-
ed by striking subsection (b). 
(2) Section 330 (122 Stat. 68) is amended by 
striking subsection (e). 
(3) Section 845 (5 U.S.C. App. 5 note) is re-
pealed. 
(q) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2009.—The Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 
417) is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 943 (122 Stat. 4578) is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (e); and
548 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(B) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), 
and (h) as subsections (e), (f), and (g), respec-
tively. 
(2) Section 1014 (122 Stat. 4586) is amended by 
striking subsection (c). 
(3) Section 1048 (122 Stat. 4603) is repealed. 
(r) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2010.—Section 121 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2211) is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (e); and 
(2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection 
(e). 
(s) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2011.—The Ike Skelton National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) 
is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 112(b) (124 Stat. 4153) is amend-
ed— 
(A) by striking paragraph (3); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 
paragraph (3). 
(2) Section 243 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amend-
ed— 
(A) by striking subsection (c); and
549 
† HR 2810 EAS 
(B) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) 
as subsections (c) and (d), respectively. 
(3) Section 866(d) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is 
amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(d) REPORTS.—’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘(2) PROGRAM
ASSESS-
MENT.—If the Secretary’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) PROGRAM ASSESSMENT.—If the Secretary’’; and 
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), re-
spectively, and indenting the left margin of such 
paragraphs, as so redesignated, two ems from the 
left margin. 
(4) Section 1054 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is re-
pealed. 
(t) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2012.—The National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended 
as follows: 
(1) Subsection (b) of section 1102 (5 U.S.C. 9902 
note) is repealed. 
(2) Section 1207 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is 
amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (n); and
561 
† HR 2810 EAS 
SEC. 1072. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REVIEW OF NAVY CA-
PABILITIES IN THE ARCTIC REGION. 
(a) REPORT ON CAPABILITIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the capabilities of the Navy in 
the Arctic region. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by para-
graph (1) shall include an analysis of the following: 
(A) The current naval capabilities of the 
Department of Defense in the Arctic region, with 
a particular emphasis on surface capabilities. 
(B) Any gaps that exist between the current 
naval capabilities described in paragraph (1) 
and the ability of the Department to fully exe-
cute its updated strategy for the Arctic region. 
(C) Any gaps in the capabilities described 
in paragraph (1) that require ice-hardening of 
existing vessels or the construction of new vessels 
to preserve freedom of navigation in the Arctic 
region whenever and wherever necessary. 
(D) An analysis and recommendation of 
which Navy vessels could be ice-hardened to effec-
tively preserve freedom of navigation in the Arc-