datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
sory Council on California Indian Policy Act of 1992
(Public Law 102–416; 25 U.S.C. 651 note), submitted its
proposals and recommendations regarding remedial meas-
ures to address the special status of California’s termi-
nated and unacknowledged Indian tribes and the needs of
California Indians relating to economic self-sufficiency,
health, and education.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to allow
the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to advise
Congress on the implementation of such proposals and
recommendations.
SEC. 3. DUTIES OF ADVISORY COUNCIL REGARDING IMPLE-
MENTATION 
OF 
PROPOSALS 
AND 
REC-
OMMENDATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Advisory Council
on California Indian Policy Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 2133)
is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6),
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and
inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(8) work with Congress, the Secretary, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the
California Indian tribes, to implement the Council’s
proposals and recommendations contained in the re-
port submitted made under paragraph (6), includ-
ing—
‘‘(A) consulting with Federal departments
and agencies to identify those recommendations
that can be implemented immediately, or in the
very near future, and those which will require
long-term changes in law, regulations, or policy;
‘‘(B) working with Federal departments
and agencies to expedite to the greatest extent
possible the implementation of the Council’s
recommendations;
‘‘(C) presenting draft legislation to Con-
gress for implementation of the recommenda-
tions requiring legislative changes;
‘‘(D) initiating discussions with the State
of California and its agencies to identify specific
areas where State actions or tribal-State co-
operation can complement actions by the Fed-
eral Government to implement specific rec-
ommendations;
‘‘(E) providing timely information to and
consulting with California Indian tribes on dis-
cussions between the Council and Federal and
State agencies regarding implementation of the
recommendations; and
‘‘(F) providing annual progress reports to
the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate
and the Committee on Resources of the House
of Representatives on the status of the imple-
mentation of the recommendations.’’
(b) TERMINATION.—The first sentence of section 8
of the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy Act
of 1992 (106 Stat. 2136) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘The Council shall cease to exist on March 31, 2000.’’
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5525 
To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service and 
commercial mobile data service through the Lifeline program. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 16, 2016 
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile 
service and commercial mobile data service through the 
Lifeline program. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Taxpayer Funded 
Cell Phones Act of 2016’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR MOBILE 
SERVICE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on January 1, 2017, 
a provider of commercial mobile service or commercial mo-
bile data service may not receive universal service support 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:43 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5525.IH
H5525
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
under sections 214(e) and 254 of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of such 
service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Com-
munications Commission. 
(b) CONTRIBUTIONS.—For calendar year 2017, the 
amount that telecommunications carriers that provide 
interstate telecommunications services and other providers 
of interstate telecommunications are required to con-
tribute under section 254(d) of the Communications Act 
of 1934 to Federal universal service support mechanisms 
shall be determined— 
(1) without regard to subsection (a); and 
(2) as if the same amount of support for the 
provision of commercial mobile service and commer-
cial mobile data service through the Lifeline pro-
gram that is provided in calendar year 2016 is pro-
vided in calendar year 2017. 
(c) EXCESS COLLECTIONS.—The amount collected 
pursuant to subsection (b)(2) shall be deposited in the 
general fund of the Treasury of the United States, for the 
sole purpose of deficit reduction. No portion of such 
amount may be treated as a credit toward future contribu-
tions required under section 254(d) of the Communica-
tions Act of 1934. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:43 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5525.IH
H5525
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) COMMERCIAL MOBILE DATA SERVICE.—The 
term ‘‘commercial mobile data service’’ has the 
meaning given such term in section 6001 of the Mid-
dle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 
(47 U.S.C. 1401). 
(2) COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE.—The term 
‘‘commercial mobile service’’ has the meaning given 
such term in section 332 of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332). 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:43 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5525.IH
H5525
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 3069 RFS
‘‘(E) providing timely information to and
consulting with California Indian tribes on dis-
cussions between the Council and Federal and
State agencies regarding implementation of the
recommendations; and
‘‘(F) providing annual progress reports to
the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate
and the Committee on Resources of the House
of Representatives on the status of the imple-
mentation of the recommendations.’’
(b) TERMINATION.—The first sentence of section 8
of the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy Act
of 1992 (106 Stat. 2136) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘The Council shall cease to exist on March 31, 2000.’’
Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1998.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
‘‘(8) work with Congress, the Secretary, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the
California Indian tribes, to implement the Council’s
proposals and recommendations contained in the re-
port submitted under paragraph (6), including—
‘‘(A) consulting with Federal departments
and agencies to identify those recommendations
that can be implemented immediately, or in the
very near future, and those which will require
long-term changes in law, regulations, or policy;
‘‘(B) working with Federal departments
and agencies to expedite to the greatest extent
possible the implementation of the Council’s
recommendations;
‘‘(C) presenting draft legislation to Con-
gress for implementation of the recommenda-
tions requiring legislative changes;
‘‘(D) initiating discussions with the State
of California and its agencies to identify specific
areas where State actions or tribal-State co-
operation can complement actions by the Fed-
eral Government to implement specific rec-
ommendations;
‘‘(E) providing timely information to and
consulting with California Indian tribes on dis-
II
Calendar No. 595
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3069
[Report No. 105–342]
To extend the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy to allow the
Advisory Council to advise Congress on the implementation of the propos-
als and recommendations of the Advisory Council.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 18, 1998
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs
SEPTEMBER 22, 1998
Reported by Mr. CAMPBELL, with an amendment
[Insert the part printed in italic]
AN ACT
To extend the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy
to allow the Advisory Council to advise Congress on
the implementation of the proposals and recommenda-
tions of the Advisory Council.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
‘‘(1) describe the composition of the partner-
ship;
‘‘(2) describe how the partnership will include
the participation of the schools, colleges, or depart-
ments of arts and sciences within the institution of
higher education to ensure the integration of peda-
gogy and content in teacher preparation;
‘‘(3) identify how the goals described in section
503 will be met and the criteria that will be used to
evaluate and measure whether the partnership is
meeting the goals;
‘‘(4) describe how the partnership will restruc-
ture and improve teaching, teacher preparation, and
development programs at the institution of higher
education and the professional development school,
and how such systemic changes will contribute to in-
creased student achievement;
‘‘(5) describe how the partnership will prepare
teachers to implement research-based, demonstrably
successful, and replicable, instructional programs
and practices that increase student achievement;
‘‘(6) describe how the teacher preparation pro-
gram in the institution of higher education, and the
induction activities and ongoing professional develop-
cussions between the Council and Federal and
State agencies regarding implementation of the
recommendations; and
‘‘(F) providing annual progress reports to
the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate
and the Committee on Resources of the House
of Representatives on the status of the imple-
mentation of the recommendations.’’.
(b) TERMINATION.—The first sentence of section 8
of the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy Act
of 1992 (106 Stat. 2136) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘The Council shall cease to exist on March 31, 2000.’’.
SEC. 4. HEALTH OR SOCIAL SERVICES FACILITY.
Section 1004(a) of the Coast Guard Authorization Act
of 1996 (Public Law 104–324; 110 Stat. 3956) is amended
by striking ‘‘use other than for a facility for the provision
of health programs funded by the Indian Health Service
(not including any such programs operated by Ketchikan
Indian Corporation prior to 1993)’’ and inserting ‘‘use as
a health or social services facility’’.
Calendar No. 595
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3069
[Report No. 105–342]
AN ACT
To extend the Advisory Council on California In-
dian Policy to allow the Advisory Council to ad-
vise Congress on the implementation of the pro-
posals and recommendations of the Advisory
Council.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1998
Reported with an amendment
may recognize a Member under this subsection, such vote 
shall be taken on that day. 
‘‘(f)(1) If, before passing a joint resolution described 
in subsection (a), one House receives from the other a 
joint resolution having the same text, then— 
‘‘(A) the joint resolution of the other House 
shall not be referred to a committee; and 
‘‘(B) the procedure in the receiving House shall 
be the same as if no joint resolution had been re-
ceived from the other House until the vote on pas-
sage, when the joint resolution received from the 
other House shall supplant the joint resolution of 
the receiving House. 
‘‘(2) This subsection shall not apply to the House of 
Representatives if the joint resolution received from the 
Senate is a revenue measure. 
‘‘(g) If either House has not taken a vote on final 
passage of the joint resolution by the last day of the period 
described in section 1100I(b)(2), then such vote shall be 
taken on that day. 
‘‘(h) This section and section 1100K are enacted by 
Congress— 
‘‘(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of 
the Senate and House of Representatives, respec-
tively, and as such is deemed to be part of the rules 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:00 Jun 21, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5527.IH
H5527
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
as determined by the Secretary, the Secretary shall
provide the appropriate persons (including the man-
ufacturers, importers, distributors, or retailers) with
an opportunity to—
‘‘(A) cease distribution of such article,
‘‘(B) notify all persons—
‘‘(i) producing, manufacturing, pack-
ing, processing, preparing, treating, pack-
aging, distributing, or holding such article,
or
‘‘(ii) to which such article has been
distributed, transported, or sold,
to immediately cease distribution of such arti-
cle,
‘‘(C) recall such article,
‘‘(D) provide, in consultation with the Sec-
retary, notice to consumers to whom such arti-
cle was, or may have been, distributed, or
‘‘(E) take any combination of the above
measures, as appropriate in the circumstances.
‘‘(2) PRE-HEARING ORDER TO CEASE DISTRIBU-
TION AND GIVE NOTICE.—If such person refuses to
or does not voluntarily cease distribution, make noti-
fication, recall such article, or provide notice to con-
sumers, as applicable, within the time and in the
‘‘§ 161. Prohibition on children riding in the front
seats of motor vehicles
‘‘(a) WITHHOLDING OF APPORTIONMENTS FOR NON-
COMPLIANCE.—
‘‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 2001.—The Secretary shall
withhold 5 percent of the amount required to be ap-
portioned to any State under each of paragraphs
(1), (3), and (5)(B) of section 104(b) on October 1,
2000, if the State does not meet the requirement of
paragraph (3) on that date.
‘‘(2) THEREAFTER.—The Secretary shall with-
hold 10 percent (including any amounts withheld
under paragraph (1)) of the amount required to be
apportioned to any State under each of paragraphs
(1), (3), and (5)(B) of section 104(b) on October 1,
2000, and on October 1 of each fiscal year there-
after, if the State does not meet the requirement of
paragraph (3) on that date.
‘‘(3) REQUIREMENT.—A State meets the re-
quirement of this paragraph if the State has enacted
and is enforcing a law that makes unlawful through-
out the State the operation of a motor vehicle if a
child under 13 years of age is riding in the front
seat of the motor vehicle.
‘‘(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY; EFFECT OF COMPLI-
ANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE.—
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 3071
To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the enactment of
State laws prohibiting children under 13 years of age from riding in
the front seats of motor vehicles.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. MILLENDER-
MCDONALD, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure
A BILL
To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the
enactment of State laws prohibiting children under 13
years of age from riding in the front seats of motor
vehicles.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CHILDREN RIDING IN THE
FRONT SEATS OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing:
‘‘(1) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY OF WITHHELD
FUNDS.—
‘‘(A) FUNDS WITHHELD ON OR BEFORE
SEPTEMBER
30, 
2002.—Any funds withheld
under subsection (a) from apportionment to any
State on or before September 30, 2002, shall
remain available until the end of the third fiscal
year following the fiscal year for which the
funds are authorized to be appropriated.
‘‘(B) FUNDS WITHHELD AFTER SEPTEM-
BER 30, 2002.—No funds withheld under this
section from apportionment to any State after
September 30, 2002, shall be available for ap-
portionment to the State.
‘‘(2) APPORTIONMENT
OF
WITHHELD
FUNDS
AFTER COMPLIANCE.—If, before the last day of the
period for which funds withheld under subsection (a)
from apportionment are to remain available for ap-
portionment to a State under paragraph (1), the
State meets the requirement of subsection (a)(3),
the Secretary shall, on the first day on which the
State meets the requirement, apportion to the State
the funds withheld under subsection (a) that remain
available for apportionment to the State.
‘‘(3) PERIOD
OF
AVAILABILITY
OF
SUBSE-
QUENTLY APPORTIONED FUNDS.—Any funds appor-
tioned pursuant to paragraph (2) shall remain avail-
able for expenditure until the end of the third fiscal
year following the fiscal year in which the funds are
so apportioned. Sums not obligated at the end of
that period shall lapse.
‘‘(4) EFFECT OF NONCOMPLIANCE.—If, at the
end of the period for which funds withheld under
subsection (a) from apportionment are available for
apportionment to a State under paragraph (1), the
State does not meet the requirement of subsection
(a)(3), the funds shall lapse.
‘‘(c) MOTOR VEHICLE DEFINED.—The term ‘motor
vehicle’ means any vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical
power manufactured primarily for use on public highways,
except any vehicle operated exclusively on a rail or rails.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of such chapter is amended by add-
ing at the end the following:
‘‘162. Prohibition on children riding in the front seats of motor vehicles.’’.
Æ
(c) OTHER CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such title 
is further amended as follows: 
(1) Section 1341 is amended by striking sub-
section (b). 
(2) Section 1351 is amended by striking ‘‘or 
the Mayor of the District of Columbia, as the case 
may be,’’. 
(3) Section 1513(a) and section 1514(a) are 
each amended by striking ‘‘the United States Inter-
national Trade Commission, or the District of Co-
lumbia government’’ and inserting ‘‘or the United 
States International Trade Commission’’. 
(4) Section 1517(b) is amended by striking ‘‘or 
the Mayor of the District of Columbia, as the case 
may be,’’. 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2016 
and each succeeding fiscal year. 
SEC. 5. OTHER CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO HOME 
RULE ACT RELATING TO CHANGES IN FED-
ERAL ROLE IN BUDGET PROCESS. 
(a) FEDERAL AUTHORITY OVER BUDGET-MAKING 
PROCESS.—Section 603(a) of the District of Columbia 
Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.03, D.C. Official Code) is 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:48 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H552.IH
H552
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 3073
To prohibit certain oil and gas leasing activities on portions of the Outer
Continental Shelf, consistent with the President’s Outer Continental Shelf
moratorium statement of June 26, 1990.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
Mr. RIGGS (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. FARR of Cali-
fornia, Mr. FILNER, Ms. HARMAN, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD,
Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. HORN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr.
GILCHREST, Mr. KLUG, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mrs. MALONEY of New
York, Mr. COX of California, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr.
DEFAZIO, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. BONO, and
Mr. CONDIT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
To prohibit certain oil and gas leasing activities on portions
of the Outer Continental Shelf, consistent with the Presi-
dent’s Outer Continental Shelf moratorium statement of
June 26, 1990.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT MORATORIUM.
The Secretary of the Interior shall not conduct any
oil and gas preleasing, leasing, or development activities
under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act in any area
placed under restriction by the President’s moratorium
statement of June 26, 1990. This section shall cease to
be effective on January 1, 2001.
Æ
amended by inserting before the period at the end the fol-
lowing: ‘‘for a fiscal year which is a control year’’. 
(b) RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE DURING CONTROL 
YEARS.—Section 603(d) of such Act (sec. 1–206.03(d), 
D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(d) In the case of a fiscal year which is a control 
year, the Council may not approve, and the Mayor may 
not forward to the President, any budget which is not con-
sistent with the financial plan and budget established for 
the fiscal year under subtitle A of title II of the District 
of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management 
Assistance Act of 1995.’’. 
(c) DEFINITION.—Section 603(f) of such Act (sec. 1– 
206.03(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(f) In this section, the term ‘control year’ has the 
meaning given such term in section 305(4) of the District 
of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management 
Assistance Act of 1995.’’. 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2016 
and each succeeding fiscal year. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:48 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H552.IH
H552
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(iii) dependent students and inde-
pendent students who do not meet the re-
quirements under subsection (b) or (c) of 
section 479.’’; and 
(2) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows: 
‘‘(f) USE OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DATA RE-
TRIEVAL TOOL TO POPULATE FAFSA.— 
‘‘(1) SIMPLIFICATION EFFORTS.—The Secretary 
shall— 
‘‘(A) make every effort to use data available 
from the Internal Revenue Service to reduce the 
amount of original data entry by applicants and 
strengthen the reliability of data used to cal-
culate expected family contributions, including 
through the use of technology to— 
‘‘(i) automatically populate the elec-
tronic version of the forms under this para-
graph with data available from the Internal 
Revenue Service; and 
‘‘(ii) direct an applicant to appro-
priate questions on such forms based on the 
applicant’s answers to previous questions; 
and 
‘‘(B) allow single taxpayers, married tax-
payers filing jointly, and married taxpayers fil-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:22 Jul 12, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5528.RH
H5528
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ing separately to utilize the data retrieval tool to 
its full capacity. 
‘‘(2) USE OF TAX RETURN IN APPLICATION PROC-
ESS.—The Secretary shall continue to examine wheth-
er data provided by the Internal Revenue Service can 
be used to generate an expected family contribution 
without additional action on the part of the student 
and taxpayer. 
‘‘(3) REPORTS
ON
FAFSA
SIMPLIFICATION
EF-
FORTS.—Not less than once every other year, the Sec-
retary shall report to the authorizing committees on 
the progress of the simplification efforts under this 
subsection. 
‘‘(4) REPORTS ON FAFSA ACCESS.—Not less than 
once every 10 years, the Secretary shall report to the 
authorizing committees on the needs of limited 
English proficient students using the FAFSA.’’. 
(b) FUNDING.— 
(1) USE OF EXISTING FUNDS.—Of the amount 
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of 
Education to maintain the Free Application for Fed-
eral Student Aid, $3,000,000 shall be available to 
carry out this Act and the amendments made by this 
Act. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:22 Jul 12, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5528.RH
H5528
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(2) NO
ADDITIONAL
FUNDS
AUTHORIZED.—No 
funds are authorized by this Act to be appropriated 
to carry out this Act or the amendments made by this 
Act. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:22 Jul 12, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5528.RH
H5528
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 526 
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5528 
[Report No. 114–678] 
A BILL 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
simplify the FAFSA, and for other purposes. 
JULY 11, 2016 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:22 Jul 12, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H5528.RH
H5528
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS