628 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 1606. DISPLAY OF PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT FOR 
THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES UNDER ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 
FOR PROCUREMENT IN FUTURE-YEARS DE-
FENSE PROGRAMS. 
Each future-years defense program submitted to Con-
gress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, 
shall, in setting forth estimated expenditures and item 
quantities for procurement for the Armed Forces for the fis-
cal years covered by such program, display separately 
under such estimated expenditures and item quantities the 
estimated expenditures for each such fiscal year for equip-
ment for each reserve component of the Armed Forces that 
will receive items in any fiscal year covered by such pro-
gram. 
SEC. 1607. ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO 
THE UNITED STATES NORTHERN COMMAND 
AND OTHER COMBATANT COMMANDS. 
(a) COMMANDS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORT TO CIVIL 
AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES.—The United States 
Northern Command and the United States Pacific Com-
mand shall be the combatant commands of the Armed 
Forces that are principally responsible for the support of 
civil authorities in the United States by the Armed Forces. 
(b) DISCHARGE OF RESPONSIBILITY.—In discharging 
the responsibility set forth in subsection (a), the Com-
629 
† HR 1540 EAS 
mander of the United States Northern Command and the 
Commander of the United States Pacific Command shall 
each— 
(1) in consultation with and acting through the 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Joint 
Force Headquarters of the National Guard of the 
State or States concerned, assist the States in the em-
ployment of the National Guard under State control, 
including National Guard operations conducted in 
State active duty or under title 32, United States 
Code; and 
(2) facilitate the deployment of the Armed Forces 
on active duty under title 10, United States Code, as 
necessary to augment and support the National 
Guard in its support of civil authorities when Na-
tional Guard operations are conducted under State 
control, whether in State active duty or under title 
32, United States Code. 
(c) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.— 
(1) MEMORANDUM REQUIRED.—Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Commander of the United States Northern Com-
mand, the Commander of the United States Pacific 
Command, and the Chief of the National Guard Bu-
reau shall, with the approval of the Secretary of De-
630 
† HR 1540 EAS 
fense, jointly enter into a memorandum of under-
standing setting forth the operational relationships, 
and individual roles and responsibilities, during re-
sponses to domestic emergencies among the United 
States Northern Command, the United States Pacific 
Command, and the National Guard Bureau. 
(2) MODIFICATION.—The Commander of the 
United States Northern Command, the Commander of 
the United States Pacific Command, and the Chief of 
the National Guard Bureau may from time to time 
modify the memorandum of understanding under this 
subsection to address changes in circumstances and 
for such other purposes as the Commander of the 
United States Northern Command, the Commander of 
the United States Pacific Command, and the Chief of 
the National Guard Bureau jointly consider appro-
priate. Each such modification shall be subject to the 
approval of the Secretary of Defense. 
(d) AUTHORITY TO MODIFY ASSIGNMENT OF COM-
MAND RESPONSIBILITY.—Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as altering or limiting the power of the President 
or the Secretary of Defense to modify the Unified Command 
Plan in order to assign all or part of the responsibility de-
scribed in subsection (a) to a combatant command other
631 
† HR 1540 EAS 
than the United States Northern Command or the United 
States Pacific Command. 
(e) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
prescribe regulations for purposes of aiding the expeditious 
implementation of the authorities and responsibilities in 
this section. 
SEC. 1608. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO NATIONAL GUARD 
OFFICERS IN CERTAIN COMMAND POSITIONS. 
(a) COMMANDER OF ARMY NORTH COMMAND.—The of-
ficer serving in the position of Commander, Army North 
Command, shall be an officer in the Army National Guard 
of the United States. 
(b) COMMANDER OF AIR FORCE NORTH COMMAND.— 
The officer serving in the position of Commander, Air Force 
North Command, shall be an officer in the Air National 
Guard of the United States. 
(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that, in assigning officers to the command positions speci-
fied in subsections (a) and (b), the President should afford 
a preference in assigning officers in the Army National 
Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the 
United States, as applicable, who have served as the adju-
tant general of a State.
632 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 1609. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS UNDER STATE PART-
NERSHIP PROGRAM FOR ADDITIONAL NA-
TIONAL 
GUARD 
CONTACTS 
ON 
MATTERS 
WITHIN THE CORE COMPETENCIES OF THE 
NATIONAL GUARD. 
The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with 
the Secretary of State, modify the regulations prescribed 
pursuant to section 1210 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) to provide for the use of 
funds available pursuant to such regulations for contacts 
between members of the National Guard and civilian per-
sonnel of foreign governments outside the ministry of de-
fense on matters within the core competencies of the Na-
tional Guard such as the following: 
(1) Disaster response and mitigation. 
(2) Defense support to civilian authorities. 
(3) Consequence management and installation 
protection. 
(4) Chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear 
event (CBRNE) response. 
(5) Border and port security and cooperation 
with civilian law enforcement. 
(6) Search and rescue. 
(7) Medical matters. 
(8) Counterdrug and counternarcotics activities.
633 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(9) Public affairs. 
(10) Employer and family support of reserve 
forces. 
(11) Such other matters within the core com-
petencies of the National Guard and suitable for con-
tacts under the State Partnership Program as the 
Secretary of Defense shall specify. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military 
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 
on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or
635 
† HR 1540 EAS 
shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding 
table in section 4501. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2104(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort Rucker ........................................................
$11,600,000 
Alaska .........................
Fort Wainwright ...............................................
$114,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ...................
$103,600,000 
California ..................
Presidio of Monterey .........................................
$3,000,000 
Fort Irwin ..........................................................
$23,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ........................................................
$238,600,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning .....................................................
$66,700,000 
Fort Gordon .......................................................
$1,450,000 
Fort Stewart ......................................................
$2,600,000 
Hawaii .......................
Fort Shafter .......................................................
$17,500,000 
Schofield Barracks .............................................
$105,000,000 
Kansas .......................
Fort Riley ..........................................................
$83,400,000 
Forbes Air Field ................................................
$5,300,000 
Kentucky ....................
Fort Campbell ....................................................
$247,500,000 
Fort Knox ..........................................................
$55,000,000 
Louisiana ...................
Fort Polk ............................................................
$70,100,000 
Maryland ...................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ................................
$78,500,000 
Fort Meade .........................................................
$79,000,000 
Missouri .....................
Fort Leonard Wood ...........................................
$49,000,000 
New York ....................
Fort Drum .........................................................
$13,300,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg .........................................................
$186,000,000 
Oklahoma ...................
Fort Sill .............................................................
$184,600,000 
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant ...............
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$63,900,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ...........................................................
$110,900,000 
Fort Hood ..........................................................
$132,000,000 
Joint Base San Antonio ...................................
$10,400,000 
Red River Army Depot .....................................
$44,000,000 
Utah ...........................
Dugway Proving Ground .................................
$32,000,000 
Virginia .....................
Fort Belvoir .......................................................
$52,000,000 
Joint Base Langley Eustis ...............................
$26,000,000 
Washington ................
Joint Base Lewis McChord ...............................
$296,300,000
636 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(2), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan ..................
Bagram Air Base ...........................................
$80,000,000 
Germany .......................
Grafenwoehr ....................................................
$22,500,000 
Landstuhl ........................................................
$63,000,000 
Oberdachstetten ...............................................
$12,200,000 
Kelley Barracks ..............................................
$12,200,000 
Vilseck ..............................................................
$20,000,000 
Korea .............................
Camp Carroll ..................................................
$41,000,000 
Camp Henry ...................................................
$48,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the 
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the 
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in 
the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Units 
Amount 
Germany ..........................
Baumholder .....................
64 .....................
$34,329,000 
Illesheim ..........................
80 .....................
$41,000,000 
Vilseck ..............................
22 .....................
$12,000,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
637 
† HR 1540 EAS 
section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry 
out architectural and engineering services and construction 
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of family housing units in an amount not to 
exceed $7,897,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Army may improve existing military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total 
amount of $3,643,146,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(a), 
$2,400,250,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(b), 
$298,900,000.
638 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $20,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $195,241,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $176,897,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including the functions described in section 
2833 
of 
title 
10, 
United 
States 
Code), 
$494,858,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
aviation complex, phase 3A at Fort Wainwright, 
Alaska, authorized by section 2101(a) of this Act, 
$57,000,000. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for 
construction of a Multipurpose Training Range at the in-
639 
† HR 1540 EAS 
stallation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 
1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the Army’s 
construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training Ranges. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, 
Washington, for construction of an access road adjoining 
McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis, the Secretary of 
the Army may construct a secure elevated roadway over the 
existing railroad and public road in lieu of an on-grade 
road and access control point. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Schofield 
Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 
452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 451 
in lieu of building 452. 
(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
640 
† HR 1540 EAS 
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort Drum, 
New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance 
Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 
construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking apron con-
sistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Aircraft 
Maintenance Hangars and associated parking aprons. 
(c) GERMANY.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden 
Air Base, Germany, for construction of an Information 
Processing Center at the installation, the Secretary of the 
Army may construct up to 9,400 square yards of vehicle 
parking garage consistent with the Army’s construction 
guidelines for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 
square yards of parking area. 
SEC. 2108. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the 
Army may carry out a military construction project to con-
struct a water treatment facility for Fort Irwin, California, 
in the amount of $115,000,000. 
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR ARMY MILI-
TARY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.—The Secretary may use
641 
† HR 1540 EAS 
available, unobligated Army military construction funds 
appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2012 for 
the project described in subsection (a). 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of 
the Army shall provide information in accordance with sec-
tion 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the 
project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary 
to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall uti-
lize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title re-
garding authorized cost and scope of work variations. 
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Louisiana ...........
Fort Polk ...........
Child Care Facility .......................
$6,100,000
642 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations—Continued 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Missouri ..............
Fort Leonard 
Wood ..............
Multipurpose Machine Gun 
Range .........................................
$4,150,000 
SEC. 2110. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Alabama .............
Anniston Army 
Depot ..................
Lake Yard Interchange .............
$1,400,000 
Hawaii ...............
Schofield Barracks
Brigade Complex ......................
$65,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Battalion Complex ....................
$69,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Battalion Complex ....................
$27,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Infrastructure Expansion ........
$76,000,000 
New Jersey .........
Picatinny Arsenal 
Ballistic Evaluation Facility 
Phase I ..................................
$9,900,000 
Virginia ..............
Fort Eustis .............
Vehicle Paint Facility ..............
$3,900,000
643 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 2111. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT CER-
TAIN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 
The table in section 3002 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4503) is amended— 
(1) in the item for the Army relating to ‘‘Entry 
Control Point and Access Roads’’ that appears imme-
diately below the item relating to ‘‘Vet Clinic & Ken-
nel’’ at Bagram Air Force Base, by striking 
‘‘Delaram Ii’’ in the State/Country and Installation 
column and inserting ‘‘Delaram II’’; and 
(2) in the item for the Army that appears imme-
diately below the item relating to ‘‘Electrical Utility 
Systems, Ph.2’’ at the Shank installation, by striking 
‘‘Expand Extended Cooperation Programme I and 
Extended Cooperation Programme 2’’ in the Project 
Title column and inserting ‘‘Expand Entry Control 
Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2’’. 
SEC. 2112. REDUCTION OF ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Army for fiscal years prior 
to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $100,000,000.
644 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 2113. TOUR NORMALIZATION. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under 
this Act may be obligated or expended for tour normaliza-
tion until— 
(1) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
Evaluation conducts an analysis of alternatives to 
tour normalization that identifies alternative courses 
of action and their associated life cycle costs, poten-
tial benefits, advantages, and disadvantages; 
(2) the Secretary of the Army submits to the con-
gressional defense committees a master plan for com-
pleting all phases of tour normalization that includes 
a detailed description of all costs and a schedule for 
the construction of necessary facilities and infrastruc-
ture; and 
(3) legislation enacted after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act authorizes the obligation of funds for 
such purpose. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(1), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects
645 
† HR 1540 EAS 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma .....................
$162,785,000 
California .................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ...............
$335,080,000 
Naval Base, Coronado ........................................
$93,735,000 
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms ...........
$67,109,000 
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow .............
$8,590,000 
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training 
Center, Bridgeport ..........................................
$16,138,000 
Naval Base Ventura County Point Mugu ........
$15,377,000 
Florida ......................
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville ........................
$36,552,000 
Naval Station, Mayport .....................................
$14,998,000 
Naval Air Station, Whiting Field (Eglin Air 
Force Base) .....................................................
$20,620,000 
Georgia ......................
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay ..................
$86,063,000 
Hawaii ......................
Marine Corps Base, Kaneohe Bay ....................
$57,704,000 
Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking 
Sands ...............................................................
$9,679,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ....................
$7,492,000 
Illinois .......................
Naval Station, Great Lakes ...............................
$91,042,000 
Maryland ..................
Naval Support Facility, Indian Head .............
$67,779,000 
Naval Air Station, Patuxent River ..................
$45,844,000 
North Carolina .........
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ..................
$200,482,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point .........
$17,760,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, New River .............
$78,930,000 
South Carolina .........
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ................
$21,096,000 
Virginia ....................
Naval Station, Norfolk .......................................
$81,304,000 
Naval Support Activity, Norfolk .......................
$26,924,000 
Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth ...........................
$74,864,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ...........................
$183,690,000 
Washington ...............
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Puget Sound 
Ship Yard) ......................................................
$13,341,000 
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Bangor) .........
$758,842,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(2), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installation or location outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Djibouti ........................
Camp Lemonier .................................................
$89,499,000 
Diego Garcia ................
Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia ...........
$35,444,000
646 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engi-
neering services and construction design activities with re-
spect to the construction or improvement of family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may improve existing military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount 
of $2,641,457,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(a), 
$1,956,822,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(b), 
$124,943,000.
647 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $21,495,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $69,362,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $100,972,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 of 
title 10, United States Code), $367,863,000. 
SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201(c) of that Act (122 Stat. 511) 
and extended by section 2206 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing
648 
† HR 1540 EAS 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, which-
ever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ..................
$2,700,000 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT
FOR CONSISTENCY
IN 
PROJECT AUTHORIZATION DISPLAY.—The table in section 
2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 511) is amended to read as follows: 
Navy: Worldwide Unspecified 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Wharf Utilities Up-
grade ........................
$8,900,000 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ..................
$2,700,000 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (122 Stat 4670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date
649 
† HR 1540 EAS 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...........
Marine Corps Base, 
Camp Pendelton .....
Operations Assess Points, 
Red Beach ........................
$11,970,000 
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion, Miramar ........
Emergency Response Sta-
tion ...................................
$6,530,000 
District of Co-
lumbia ............
Washington Navy 
Yard ........................
Child Development Center ..
$9,340,000 
SEC. 2207. REDUCTION OF NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Navy for fiscal years prior 
to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $25,000,000. 
SEC. 2208. GUAM REALIGNMENT. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under 
this title, or amounts provided by the Government of Japan 
for military construction activities on land under the juris-
diction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated or 
expended to implement the realignment of United States 
Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam as envisioned 
in the United States–Japan Roadmap for Realignment Im-
plementation issued May 1, 2006, until—
650 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(1) the Commandant of the Marine Corps pro-
vides the congressional defense committees the Com-
mandant’s preferred force lay-down for the United 
States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility; 
(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the con-
gressional defense committees a master plan for the 
construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute 
the Commandant’s preferred force lay-down on Guam, 
including a detailed description of costs and a sched-
ule for such construction; 
(3) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the con-
gressional defense committees that tangible progress 
has been made regarding the relocation of Marine 
Corps Air Station Futenma; and 
(4) a plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal 
agencies is provided to the congressional defense com-
mittees detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a 
schedule for completion of construction, improve-
ments, and repairs to the non-military utilities, fa-
cilities, and infrastructure on Guam affected by the 
realignment of forces.
651 
† HR 1540 EAS 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................................
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$45,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ..
$97,000,000 
Arizona ...................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .......
$33,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .........................
$24,000,000 
California ...............................
Travis Air Force Base ......................
$22,000,000 
Vandenberg Air Force Base .............
$14,200,000 
Colorado .................................
U.S. Air Force Academy ..................
$13,400,000 
Delaware .................................
Dover Air Force Base .......................
$2,800,000 
Kansas ....................................
Fort Riley, Kansas ...........................
$7,600,000 
Louisiana ...............................
Barksdale Air Force Base ................
$23,500,000 
Missouri ..................................
Whiteman Air Force Base ................
$4,800,000 
Nebraska .................................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$564,000,000 
Nevada ....................................
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$35,850,000 
New Mexico ............................
Cannon Air Force Base ....................
$22,598,000 
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$29,200,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$25,000,000 
North Carolina .......................
Pope Air Force Base .........................
$6,000,000 
North Dakota .........................
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$67,800,000 
Texas .......................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...................
$110,000,000 
Utah ........................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$16,500,000 
Virginia ..................................
Joint Base Langley Eustis ...............
$50,000,000 
Washington .............................
Fairchild Air Force Base .................
$27,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(2), the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
652 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany .........................................
Ramstein Air Base .......................
$34,697,000 
Greenland .......................................
Thule Air Base ..............................
$28,000,000 
Guam ..............................................
Joint Region Marianas ................
$64,400,000 
Italy ................................................
Naval Air Station, Signonella .....
$15,000,000 
Korea ..............................................
Osan Air Base ...............................
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $4,208,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may improve existing military fam-
ily housing units in an amount not to exceed $80,596,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total 
amount of $1,619,423,000, as follows:
653 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2301(a), 
$677,848,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2301(b), 
$165,897,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $20,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $67,913,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $84,804,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 of 
title 10, United States Code), $404,761,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
Air Force Technical Applications Center at Patrick 
Air Force Base, Florida, as authorized by section 
2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 
111–383; 124 Stat. 4444), $79,000,000.
654 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(7) For the construction of increment 1 of a 
STRATCOM replacement facility at Offutt Air Force 
Base, Nebraska, authorized by section 2301(a) of this 
Act, $120,000,000. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY 
OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2636) for Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, 
for construction of a Ground Control Tower at the installa-
tion, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 43 
vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 square me-
ters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s con-
struction guidelines for control towers, using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations in 
prior years. 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2301(b) of that Act (122 Stat. 4680) 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date
655 
† HR 1540 EAS 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later: 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Germany ............
Spangdahlem AB ............
Construct Child Devel-
opment Center ........
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2307. REDUCTION OF AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Air Force for fiscal years 
prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $32,000,000. 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGENCIES 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(1), the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
656 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Redstone Arsenal ................................................
$58,800,000 
Alaska .........................
Anchorage ............................................................
$18,400,000 
Eielson Air Force Base ......................................
$14,800,000 
Arizona .......................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .........................
$23,000,000 
California ...................
Defense Distribution Depot Tracy ....................
$15,500,000 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ...............
$12,141,000 
Naval Base, Coronado ........................................
$42,000,000 
Naval Base, Coronado (San Clemente) .............
$21,800,000 
Colorado ......................
Buckley Air Force Base .....................................
$140,932,000 
District of Columbia ..
Bolling Air Force Base ......................................
$16,736,000 
Florida ........................
Eglin Air Force Base .........................................
$61,100,000 
Macdill Air Force Base ......................................
$15,200,000 
Naval Air Station, Whiting Field .....................
$3,800,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning ......................................................
$37,205,000 
Fort Gordon ........................................................
$17,705,000 
Fort Stewart .......................................................
$72,300,000 
Hawaii ........................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .....................
$14,400,000 
Illinois ........................
Naval Station, Great Lakes ...............................
$16,900,000 
Kentucky .....................
Fort Campbell .....................................................
$138,500,000 
Fort Knox ............................................................
$38,845,000 
Louisiana ...................
Barksdale Air Force Base ..................................
$6,200,000 
Maryland ....................
Joint Base Andrews ...........................................
$265,700,000 
National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda ........
$18,000,000 
Massachusetts .............
Hanscom Air Force Base ...................................
$34,040,000 
Westover Air Reserve Base .................................
$23,300,000 
Mississippi ..................
Columbus Air Force Base ..................................
$2,600,000 
Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport ..........
$34,700,000 
Missouri ......................
Arnold ..................................................................
$9,253,000 
New Mexico .................
Cannon Air Force Base .....................................
$132,997,000 
New York ....................
Fort Drum ...........................................................
$20,400,000 
North Carolina ...........
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$6,670,000 
Fort Bragg ..........................................................
$206,274,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, New River .............
$22,687,000 
Pope Air Force Base ..........................................
$5,400,000 
Ohio .............................
Defense Supply Center Columbus .....................
$10,000,000 
Oklahoma ....................
Altus Air Force Base ..........................................
$8,200,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland
$17,500,000 
Defense Supply Center Philadelphia ................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ...........
Joint Base Charleston ........................................
$24,868,000 
Texas ...........................
Joint Base Antonio ............................................
$194,300,000 
Virginia ......................
Charlottesville .....................................................
$10,805,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort 
Story ................................................................
$37,000,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ...........................
$46,727,000 
Naval Air Station, Oceana (Dam Neck) ..........
$23,116,000 
Dahlgren ..............................................................
$1,988,000 
Pentagon Reservation .........................................
$8,742,000 
Washington .................
Joint Base Lewis-McChord ................................
$35,000,000 
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ..................
$25,000,000 
West Virginia .............
Camp Dawson .....................................................
$2,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(2), the Secretary of Defense may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
657 
† HR 1540 EAS 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ...............
Ansbach ...............................................................
$11,672,000 
Grafenwoehr ........................................................
$6,529,000 
Spangdahlem Air Base ......................................
$129,043,000 
Stuttgart-Patch Barracks ..................................
$2,434,000 
Italy ......................
Vicenza ................................................................
$41,864,000 
Japan ....................
Yokota Air Base ..................................................
$61,842,000 
United Kingdom ..
Menwith Hill Station .........................................
$68,601,000 
Royal Air Force Alconbury ...............................
$35,030,000 
SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(6), the Secretary 
of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects 
under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the 
amount of $135,000,000. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the mili-
tary departments) in the total amount of $3,212,498,000, 
as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(a), 
$1,476,499,000.
658 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(b), 
$357,004,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States 
Code, $32,964,000. 
(4) For contingency construction projects of the 
Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, 
United States Code, $10,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $399,602,000. 
(6) For energy conservation projects under chap-
ter 173 of title 10, United States Code, $135,000,000. 
(7) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 of 
title 10, United States Code), $50,723,000. 
(B) For credits to the Department of De-
fense Family Housing Improvement Fund under 
section 2883 of title 10, United States Code, and 
the Homeowners Assistance Fund established 
under section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities 
and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 
U.S.C. 3374), $3,468,000.
659 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(8) For the construction of increment 6 of the 
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Dis-
eases Stage I at Fort Detrick, Maryland, authorized 
by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of 
Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $137,600,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 4 of re-
placement fuel storage facilities at Point Loma 
Annex, California, authorized by section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 
122 Stat. 521), as amended by section 2406 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2646), $27,000,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 4 of the 
United States Army Medical Research Institute of 
Chemical Defense replacement facility at Aberdeen 
Proving Ground, Maryland, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4689), $22,850,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 3 of a Na-
tional Security Agency data center at Camp Wil-
liams, Utah, authorized as a Military Construction,
660 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Defense-Wide project by title IX of the Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 
Stat. 1888), $123,201,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2642), $109,400,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 1 of a 
Mountainview operations facility at Buckley Air 
Force Base, Colorado, authorized by section 2401(a) 
of this Act, $70,432,000. 
(14) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
ambulatory care center at Joint Base Andrews, Mary-
land, authorized by section 2401(a) of this Act, 
$121,500,000. 
(15) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
ambulatory care center, phase 3 at Fort Bliss, Texas, 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(a) 
of 
this 
Act, 
$80,600,000.
661 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Subtitle B—Chemical 
Demilitarization Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEM-
ICAL 
DEMILITARIZATION 
CONSTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction and land acquisition for chemical demili-
tarization in the total amount of $75,312,000, as follows: 
(1) For the construction of phase 13 of a chem-
ical munitions demilitarization facility at Pueblo 
Chemical Activity, Colorado, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 
104–201; 110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 
2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 
65; 113 Stat. 839), section 2407 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (di-
vision B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), 
and section 2413 of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), $15,338,000. 
(2) For the construction of phase 12 of a muni-
tions demilitarization facility at Blue Grass Army
664 
† HR 1540 EAS 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the Army National Guard locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort McClellan ...................................................
$16,500,000 
Arizona ......................
Papago Military Reservation ...........................
$17,800,000 
Arkansas ....................
Fort Chafee ........................................................
$3,500,000 
California ..................
Camp Roberts ....................................................
$38,160,000 
Camp San Luis Obispo ....................................
$8,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Alamosa ..............................................................
$6,400,000 
Aurora ................................................................
$3,600,000 
Fort Carson ........................................................
$43,000,000 
District of Columbia
Anacostia ............................................................
$5,300,000 
Florida .......................
Camp Blanding .................................................
$5,500,000 
Georgia .......................
Atlanta ...............................................................
$11,000,000 
Hinesville ...........................................................
$17,500,000 
Macon .................................................................
$14,500,000 
Hawaii .......................
Kalaeloa .............................................................
$33,000,000 
Illinois ........................
Normal ...............................................................
$10,000,000 
Indiana ......................
Camp Atterbury ................................................
$81,900,000 
Indianapolis ......................................................
$25,700,000 
Maine .........................
Bangor ................................................................
$15,600,000 
Brunswick ..........................................................
$23,000,000 
Maryland ...................
Dundalk .............................................................
$16,000,000 
La Plata .............................................................
$9,000,000 
Westminster .......................................................
$10,400,000 
Massachusetts .............
Natick .................................................................
$9,000,000 
Minnesota ..................
Camp Ripley .....................................................
$8,400,000 
Mississippi .................
Camp Shelby ......................................................
$64,600,000 
Nebraska ....................
Grand Island .....................................................
$22,000,000 
Mead ...................................................................
$9,100,000 
Nevada .......................
Las Vegas ...........................................................
$23,000,000 
New Jersey .................
Lakehurst ...........................................................
$49,000,000 
New Mexico ................
Santa Fe ............................................................
$5,200,000 
North Carolina ..........
Greensboro ..........................................................
$3,700,000 
Oklahoma ...................
Camp Gruber .....................................................
$13,361,000 
Oregon ........................
The Dalles ..........................................................
$13,800,000 
South Carolina ..........
Allendale .............................................................
$4,300,000
665 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Utah ...........................
Camp Williams .................................................
$6,500,000 
Virginia .....................
Fort Pickett ........................................................
$11,000,000 
West Virginia ............
Buckhannon .......................................................
$10,000,000 
Wisconsin ...................
Camp Williams ..................................................
$7,000,000 
Wyoming ....................
Cheyenne ............................................................
$8,900,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army National Guard: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Puerto Rico .........................
Fort Buchanan .........................................
$57,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(2), the Secretary 
of the Army may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the Army Reserve locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Fort Hunter Liggett ................................
$5,200,000 
Colorado ..............................
Fort Collins ..............................................
$13,600,000 
Illinois .................................
Homewood ................................................
$16,000,000 
Rockford ....................................................
$12,800,000 
Indiana ...............................
Fort Benjamin Harrison .........................
$57,000,000
666 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Army Reserve—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Kansas .................................
Kansas City ..............................................
$13,000,000 
Massachusetts ......................
Attleboro ....................................................
$22,000,000 
Minnesota ............................
Saint Joseph .............................................
$11,800,000 
Missouri ...............................
Weldon Springs ........................................
$19,000,000 
New York .............................
Schenectady ..............................................
$20,000,000 
North Carolina ...................
Greensboro ................................................
$19,000,000 
South Carolina ...................
Orangeburg ...............................................
$12,000,000 
Wisconsin ............................
Fort McCoy ...............................................
$27,300,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(3), the Secretary 
of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 
Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in 
the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......................
Pittsburgh .................................................
$13,759,000 
Tennessee .............................
Memphis ....................................................
$7,949,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(4), the Secretary 
of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the Air National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
667 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .........................
Beale Air Force Base .................................
$6,100,000 
Moffett Field ...............................................
$26,000,000 
Hawaii ..............................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ............
$39,521,000 
Indiana .............................
Fort Wayne International Airport ...........
$4,000,000 
Maryland ..........................
Martin State Airport .................................
$4,900,000 
Massachusetts ....................
Otis Air National Guard Base ..................
$7,800,000 
Ohio ...................................
Springfield Beckley-Municipal Airport ....
$6,700,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(5), the Secretary 
of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve lo-
cations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
March Air Force Base .............................
$16,393,000 
South Carolina ...................
Charleston Air Force Base ......................
$9,593,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for the costs 
of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and 
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, 
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 
of land for those facilities), in the following amounts:
668 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(1) For the Department of the Army, for the 
Army 
National 
Guard 
of 
the 
United 
States, 
$773,592,000. 
(2) For the Department of the Army, for the 
Army Reserve, $280,549,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Navy, for the 
Navy and Marine Corps Reserve, $26,299,000. 
(4) For the Department of the Air Force, for the 
Air 
National 
Guard 
of 
the 
United 
States, 
$116,246,000. 
(5) For the Department of the Air Force, for the 
Air Force Reserve, $33,620,000. 
SEC. 2607. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2601 and 2604 of that Act (122 Stat. 
527–528), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or 
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for 
military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows:
669 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Army National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......
Coatesville .........
Readiness Center ...........................
$ 8,300,000 
SEC. 2608. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the tables in subsection (b), 
as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2603 of that Act, 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLES.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows: 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Indiana ..............
Camp Atterbury ..............
Multipurpose Machine 
Gun Range .............
$5,800,000 
Nevada ...............
Elko ..................................
Readiness Center ........
$11,375,000 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Mississippi .........
Gulfport-Biloxi Inter-
national Airport .........
Relocate munitions 
storage complex ......
$3,400,000 
Air Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
New York ...........
Staten Island ...................
Army Reserve Center
$18,550,000
670 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve: Extension of 2009 
Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Delaware ............
Wilmington ......................
Armed Forces Reserve 
Center .....................
$11,530,000 
SEC. 2609. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2601(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4701) for Elko, Nevada, for construction 
of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may 
instead construct the Army Reserve Center at Carlin, Ne-
vada. 
TITLE XXVII—BASE CLOSURE 
AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
REALIGNMENT 
AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base clo-
sure and realignment activities, including real property ac-
quisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense
671 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of 
such Act, in the total amount of $323,543,000, as follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$70,716,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$129,351,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$123,476,000. 
SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLO-
SURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AC-
COUNT 2005. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2703, the Secretary of 
Defense may carry out base closure and realignment activi-
ties, including real property acquisition and military con-
struction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Pub-
lic Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through 
the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 es-
tablished by section 2906A of such Act, in the amount of 
$258,776,000.
672 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 2703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
REALIGNMENT 
AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base clo-
sure and realignment activities, including real property ac-
quisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A of 
such Act, in the total amount of $258,776,000 as follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$229,190,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$25,829,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$1,966,000. 
(4) For the Defense Agencies, $1,791,000.
673 
† HR 1540 EAS 
SEC. 2704. REDUCTION OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AU-
THORIZATION FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
AUTHORIZED 
THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 
Amounts previously authorized for base closure and re-
alignment activities, including real property acquisition 
and military construction projects, as authorized by the De-
fense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A 
of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) 
and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure 
Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such Act for 
fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced 
by $100,000,000. 
TITLE 
XXVIII—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION GENERAL PROVI-
SIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction 
Program and Military Family 
Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. GENERAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION TRANSFER 
AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION OF 
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon a determination by the 
Secretary of a military department, or with respect
674 
† HR 1540 EAS 
to the Defense Agencies, the Secretary of Defense, that 
such action is necessary in the national interest, the 
Secretary concerned may transfer amounts of author-
ization of appropriations made available to that mili-
tary department or Defense Agency in this division 
for fiscal year 2012 between any such authorization 
of appropriations for that military department or De-
fense Agency for that fiscal year. Amounts of author-
ization of appropriations so transferred shall be 
merged with and be available for the same purposes 
as the authorization of appropriations to which 
transferred. 
(2) AGGREGATE LIMIT.—The aggregate amount 
of authorizations that the Secretaries concerned may 
transfer under the authority of this section may not 
exceed $400,000,000. 
(b) LIMITATION.—The authority provided by this sec-
tion to transfer authorizations may only be used to fund 
increases in the cost of military construction projects that 
have been authorized by law. 
(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A trans-
fer made from one account to another under the authority 
of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount au-
thorized for appropriation for the account to which the
675 
† HR 1540 EAS 
amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount 
transferred. 
(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary concerned 
shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees 
of each transfer made by that Secretary under subsection 
(a). 
SEC. 2802. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHOR-
ITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS OUT-
SIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 
2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 
Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4459), 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 
2011’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 
2012’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal 
year 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’.
676 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(b) MODIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORTING RE-
QUIREMENT.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY REPORTS OR’’ in 
the subsection heading; 
(2) by striking ‘‘the report for a fiscal-year quar-
ter under subsection (d) or’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘report or’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (a) and 
(i) of such section are amended by striking ‘‘Combined Task 
Force-Horn of Africa’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa’’. 
SEC. 2803. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE THE 
PENTAGON RESERVATION MAINTENANCE RE-
VOLVING FUND FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION 
AND ALTERATION ACTIVITIES AT THE PEN-
TAGON RESERVATION. 
Section 2674(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The authority’’ and inserting 
‘‘(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 
authority’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph: 
‘‘(B) The Secretary may use monies from the Fund 
to support construction or alteration activities at the Pen-
677 
† HR 1540 EAS 
tagon Reservation within the limits stated in section 2805 
of this title.’’. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and 
Facilities Administration 
SEC. 2811. EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY AT MILITARY INSTAL-
LATIONS. 
(a) EXCHANGE AUTHORITY.—Section 2869 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Con-
veyance of property at military installa-
tions to limit encroachment’’ and inserting 
‘‘Exchange of property at military instal-
lations’’; and 
(2) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in the subsection heading, by striking 
‘‘CONVEYANCE
AUTHORIZED; CONSIDERATION’’ 
and inserting ‘‘EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘to any 
person who agrees, in exchange for the real prop-
erty, to carry out a land acquisition’’ and in-
serting ‘‘to any eligible entity who agrees, in ex-
change for the real property, to transfer to the 
United States all right, title, and interest of the 
entity in and to a parcel of real property, in-
678 
† HR 1540 EAS 
cluding any improvements thereon under their 
control, or to carry out a land acquisition’’. 
(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Such section is fur-
ther amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (f); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as 
subsections (f) and (g), respectively. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by 
striking the item relating to section 2869 and inserting the 
following new item: 
‘‘2869. Exchange of property at military installations.’’. 
SEC. 2812. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO LIMIT EN-
CROACHMENTS. 
(a) INAPPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN CONTRACT RE-
QUIREMENTS.—Subsection (c) of section 2684a of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN CONTRACT RE-
QUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, an 
agreement under this section that is a cooperative agree-
ment or a grant may be used to acquire property or services 
for the direct benefit or use of the United States Govern-
ment.’’. 
(b) ACQUISITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY AND 
INTERESTS.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3)—
679 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(A) by inserting ‘‘, and the monitoring and 
enforcement of any right, title, or interest in,’’ 
after ‘‘resources on’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘and monitoring and en-
forcement’’ after ‘‘natural resource manage-
ment’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘Any such payment by the United States— 
‘‘(A) may be paid in a lump sum and in-
clude an amount intended to cover the future 
costs of natural resource management and moni-
toring and enforcement; and 
‘‘(B) shall be placed by the eligible entity in 
an interest-bearing account, and any interest 
shall be applied for the same purposes as the 
principal.’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (5)— 
(A) inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(5)’’; 
(B) by inserting after the first sentence the 
following: ‘‘No such requirement need be included 
in the agreement if the property or interest is 
being transferred to a State, or the agreement re-
quires it to be subsequently transferred to a 
State, and the Secretary concerned determines 
that the laws and regulations applicable to the
680 
† HR 1540 EAS 
future use of such property or interest provide 
adequate assurance that the property concerned 
will be developed and used in a manner appro-
priate for purposes of this section.’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if all or a 
portion of the property or interest acquired under the agree-
ment is subsequently transferred to the United States and 
administrative jurisdiction over the property is under a 
Federal official other than a Secretary concerned, the Sec-
retary concerned and that Federal official shall enter into 
a memorandum of agreement providing, to the satisfaction 
of the Secretary concerned, for the management of the prop-
erty or interest concerned in a manner appropriate for pur-
poses of this section. Such memorandum of agreement shall 
also provide that, should it be proposed that the property 
or interest concerned be developed or used in a manner not 
appropriate for purposes of this section, including declaring 
the property to be excess to the agency’s needs or proposing 
to exchange the property for other property, the Secretary 
concerned may request that administrative jurisdiction over 
the property be transferred to the Secretary concerned at 
no cost, and, upon such a request being made, the adminis-
681 
† HR 1540 EAS 
trative jurisdiction over the property shall be transferred 
accordingly.’’. 
SEC. 2813. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONSERVATION AND 
CULTURAL ACTIVITIES. 
Section 2694(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and sus-
tainability’’ after ‘‘safety’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph: 
‘‘(F) The implementation of ecosystem-wide land 
management plans— 
‘‘(i) for a single ecosystem that encompasses 
at least two non-contiguous military installa-
tions, if those military installations are not all 
under the administrative jurisdiction of the same 
Secretary of a military department; and 
‘‘(ii) providing synergistic benefits unavail-
able if the installations acted separately.’’. 
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances 
SEC. 2821. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, CAMP 
JOSEPH T. ROBINSON, ARKANSAS. 
Section 2852 of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2685) is amended by striking ‘‘to be ac-
682 
† HR 1540 EAS 
quired by the United States of America’’ and inserting ‘‘to 
be acquired by the Military Department of Arkansas’’. 
SEC. 2822. CLARIFICATION OF LAND CONVEYANCE AUTHOR-
ITY, CAMP CAITLIN AND OHANA NUI AREAS, 
HAWAII. 
Section 2856(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2689) is amended by inserting before the 
period at the end the following: ‘‘, before the property or 
portion thereof is made available for transfer pursuant to 
the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act (title II of Public 
Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal 
agency, or for disposal under applicable laws’’. 
SEC. 2823. LAND CONVEYANCE AND EXCHANGE, JOINT 
BASE ELMENDORF RICHARDSON, ALASKA. 
(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.— 
(1) MUNICIPALITY
OF
ANCHORAGE.—The Sec-
retary of the Air Force may, in consultation with the 
Secretary of the Interior, convey to the Municipality 
of Anchorage (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Mu-
nicipality’’) all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to all or any part of a parcel of real 
property, including any improvements thereon, con-
sisting of approximately 220 acres at JBER situated 
to the west of and adjacent to the Anchorage Regional
683 
† HR 1540 EAS 
Landfill in Anchorage, Alaska, for solid waste man-
agement purposes, including reclamation thereof, and 
for alternative energy production, and other related 
activities. This authority may not be exercised unless 
and until the March 15, 1982, North Anchorage Land 
Agreement is amended by the parties thereto to spe-
cifically permit the conveyance under this subpara-
graph. 
(2) EKLUTNA, INC..—The Secretary of the Air 
Force may, in consultation with the Secretary of the 
Interior, upon terms mutually agreeable to the Sec-
retary of the Air Force and Eklutna, Inc., an Alaska 
Native village corporation organized pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 
et seq.) (in this section referred to as ‘‘Eklutna’’), con-
vey to Eklutna all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to all or any part of a parcel 
of real property, including any improvements thereon, 
consisting of approximately 130 acres situated on the 
northeast corner of the Glenn Highway and Boniface 
Parkway in Anchorage, Alaska, or such other prop-
erty as may be identified in consultation with the 
Secretary of the Interior, for any use compatible with 
JBER’s current and reasonably foreseeable mission as 
determined by the Secretary of the Air Force.
684 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(3) RIGHT TO WITHHOLD TRANSFER.—The Sec-
retary may withhold transfer of any portion of the 
real property described in paragraphs (1) and (2) 
based on public interest or military mission require-
ments. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) MUNICIPALITY PROPERTY.—As consideration 
for the conveyance under subsection (a)(1), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force shall receive in-kind solid 
waste management services at the Anchorage Regional 
Landfill or such other consideration as determined 
satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least fair 
market value of the property conveyed. 
(2) EKLUTNA PROPERTY.—As consideration for 
the conveyance under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary 
of the Air Force is authorized to receive, upon terms 
mutually agreeable to the Secretary and Eklutna, 
such interests in the surface estate of real property 
owned by Eklutna and situated at the northeast 
boundary of JBER and other consideration as consid-
ered satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least 
fair market value of the property conveyed. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force shall require the Municipality and Eklutna
685 
† HR 1540 EAS 
to reimburse the Secretary to cover costs (except costs 
for environmental remediation of the property) to be 
incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Sec-
retary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry 
out the conveyances under subsection (a), including 
survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, 
and any other administrative costs related to the con-
veyance. 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph 
(1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was 
used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in 
carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited 
shall be merged with amounts in such fund or ac-
count, and shall be available for the same purposes, 
and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as 
amounts in such fund or account. 
(d) TREATMENT
OF
CASH
CONSIDERATION
RE-
CEIVED.—Any cash payment received by the United States 
as consideration for the conveyances under subsection (a) 
shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury 
established under subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, 
United States Code, and shall be available in accordance 
with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection.
686 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 
and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 
under subsection (a) shall be determined by surveys satis-
factory to the Secretary. 
(f) OTHER
OR ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDI-
TIONS.—The Secretary may require such additional terms 
and conditions in connection with the conveyances under 
subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
protect the interests of the United States. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 2831. INVESTMENT PLAN FOR THE MODERNIZATION 
OF PUBLIC SHIPYARDS UNDER JURISDICTION 
OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. 
(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2012, 
the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a plan to address the facilities and in-
frastructure requirements at each public shipyard under the 
jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. 
(b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 
(a) shall include the following elements: 
(1) A description of the operations and support 
required at each shipyard under the control of the 
Secretary, including the location, year constructed, 
the classes of ships serviced, number of personnel as-
687 
† HR 1540 EAS 
signed, and the average age of facilities at each loca-
tion. 
(2) A review of all workload requirements in the 
past 5 years, an assessment of the efficiency in the use 
of existing facilities to meet the workload, and an es-
timate of the workload planned for each shipyard 
through the current Future Years Defense plan. 
(3) An assessment of the adequacy of each facil-
ity— 
(A) to carry out efficient depot-level ship 
maintenance with modern technology and equip-
ment; 
(B) to ensure workplace safety; 
(C) to support nuclear-related activities 
(where applicable); 
(D) to maintain the quality of life of the 
workforce; and 
(E) to meet the energy savings goals of the 
Secretary of the Navy for military installations. 
(4) An assessment of the existing condition of 
each facility at each shipyard to include a review of 
existing and projected deficiencies or inadequate con-
ditions at each facility, and whether any of the facili-
ties listed are temporary structures.
688 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(5) A description and cost estimate for each 
project to improve, repair, renovate, or modernize fa-
cilities or infrastructure. 
(6) A description of the facility improvements or 
new construction projects at each shipyard that would 
improve the efficiency of the facility’s operations or 
generate energy savings based upon a business case 
analysis. 
(7) An investment strategy planned for each 
shipyard to correct deficiencies identified in para-
graph (4), including timelines to complete each 
project and cost estimates and timelines necessary to 
complete the projects identified in paragraph (6). 
(8) A list of projects, costs, and timelines through 
the future years defense plan to meet the requirements 
of the minimum capital investment percentage re-
quired under section 2476 of title 10, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 2832. DATA SERVERS AND CENTERS. 
(a) LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.— 
(1) LIMITATIONS.— 
(A) BEFORE PERFORMANCE PLAN.—During 
the period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act and ending on May 1, 2012, a 
department, agency, or component of the Depart-
696 
† HR 1540 EAS 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Appropriations, and the Perma-
nent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
House of Representatives. 
SEC. 2833. REDESIGNATION OF MIKE O’CALLAGHAN FED-
ERAL 
HOSPITAL 
IN 
NEVADA 
AS 
MIKE 
O’CALLAGHAN FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER. 
(a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 2867 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 2806), as amended 
by section 8135(a) of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 1997 (section 101(b) of division A of the Omnibus 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104– 
208; 110 Stat. 3009–118)), is further amended by striking 
‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital’’ each place it appears 
and inserting ‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such 
section 2867 is amended to read as follows: