datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(C) by inserting ‘‘representatives of police
labor and management organizations, commu-
nity residents,’’ after ‘‘supervisors,’’.
(e) TECHNOLOGY AND PROSECUTION PROGRAMS.—
Section 1701 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd) is amended
by—
(1) striking subsection (k);
(2) redesignating subsections (f) through (j) as
subsections (g) through (k); and
(3) striking subsection (e) and inserting the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(e) LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.—
Grants made under subsection (a) may be used to assist
police departments, in employing professional, scientific,
and technological advancements that will help them—
‘‘(1) improve police communications through
the use of wireless communications, computers, soft-
ware, videocams, databases and other hardware and
software that allow law enforcement agencies to
communicate more effectively across jurisdictional
boundaries and effectuate interoperability;
‘‘(2) develop and improve access to crime solv-
ing technologies, including DNA analysis, photo en-
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2015
To redesignate the Federal building located at 3348 South Kedzie Avenue,
in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Paul Simon Chicago Job Corps Center’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 25, 2001
Mr. COSTELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To redesignate the Federal building located at 3348 South
Kedzie Avenue, in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Paul Simon
Chicago Job Corps Center’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAUL SIMON CHICAGO JOB
CORPS CENTER.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building located at
3348 South Kedzie Avenue, in Chicago, Illinois, and
known as the ‘‘Chicago Job Corps Center’’ shall be known
and designated as the ‘‘Paul Simon Chicago Job Corps
Center’’.
‘‘(ii) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year
2003;
‘‘(iii) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year
2004;
‘‘(iv) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year
2005;
‘‘(v) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year
2006; and
‘‘(vi) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year
2007.’’; and
(2) in subparagraph (B)—
(A) by striking ‘‘3 percent’’ and inserting
‘‘5 percent’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘1701(f)’’ and inserting
‘‘1701(g)’’;
(C) by striking the second sentence and in-
serting ‘‘Of the remaining funds, if there is a
demand for 50 percent of appropriated hiring
funds, as determined by eligible hiring applica-
tions from law enforcement agencies having ju-
risdiction over areas with populations exceeding
150,000, no less than 50 percent shall be allo-
cated for grants pursuant to applications sub-
mitted by units of local government or law en-
forcement agencies having jurisdiction over
areas with populations exceeding 150,000 or by
public and private entities that serve areas with
populations exceeding 150,000, and no less
than 50 percent shall be allocated for grants
pursuant to applications submitted by units of
local government or law enforcement agencies
having jurisdiction over areas with populations
less than 150,000 or by public and private enti-
ties that serve areas with populations less than
150,000.’’;
(D) by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ and inserting
‘‘$600,000,000’’; and
(E) by striking ‘‘1701(b),’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘of part Q’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: ‘‘1701 (b) and (c), $350,000,000 to
grants for the purposes specified in section
1701(e), and $200,000,000 to grants for the
purposes specified in section 1701(f).’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 200
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction
for host families of foreign exchange and other students from $50 per
month to $200 per month.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase
the deduction for host families of foreign exchange and
other students from $50 per month to $200 per month.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR
AMOUNTS PAID TO MAINTAIN CERTAIN STU-
DENTS AS MEMBERS OF TAXPAYER’S HOUSE-
HOLD.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section
170(g)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
to amounts paid to maintain certain students as members
of taxpayer’s household) is amended by striking ‘‘$50’’
and inserting ‘‘$200’’.
(b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Section 170(g)
of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
‘‘(5) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—In the case of any
taxable year beginning in a calendar year after
2001, the $200 amount contained in paragraph
(2)(A) shall be increased by an amount equal
to—
‘‘(i) $200, multiplied by
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de-
termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal-
endar year in which the taxable year be-
gins by substituting ‘calendar year 2000’
for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph
(B) thereof.
‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—If any increase deter-
mined under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of
$10, such increase shall be rounded to the next
highest multiple of $10.’’.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
States to the Federal building referred to in subsection
(a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Paul Simon
Chicago Job Corps Center.
Æ
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this Act shall apply to taxable years beginning after De-
cember 31, 2000.
Æ
V
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2010
For the relief of Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul
Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 24, 2001
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima
Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 
1. 
PERMANENT 
RESIDENT 
STATUS 
FOR
KADIATOU 
DIALLO, 
LAOURATOU 
DIALLO,
IBRAHIMA DIALLO, ABDOUL DIALLO, AND
MAMADOU BOBO DIALLO.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo,
Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo shall each be
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust-
ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence upon filing an application for
issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi-
dent.
(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Kadiatou Diallo,
Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, or
Mamadou Bobo Diallo enters the United States before the
filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of
status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima
Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo, the Sec-
retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce
by 5, during the current or next following fiscal year, the
total number of immigrant visas that are made available
to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli-
cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made
available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth
under section 202(e) of such Act.
(e) 
DENIAL
OF
PREFERENTIAL
IMMIGRATION
TREATMENT
FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
parents, brothers, and sisters of Kadiatou Diallo,
Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and
Mamadou Bobo Diallo shall not, by virtue of such relation-
ship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the
Immigration and Nationality Act.
Æ
SEC. 2. FEDERAL ENTITIES AND FACILITIES.
Section 120 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
U.S.C. 9620) is amended as follows:
(1) By amending the heading to read as follows:
‘‘SEC. 120. FEDERAL ENTITIES AND FACILITIES.’’.
(2) By amending paragraph (1) of subsection
(a) to read as follows:
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—(A) Each department,
agency, and instrumentality of the executive, legisla-
tive, and judicial branches of the United States shall
be subject to, and comply with, this Act and all
other Federal, State, interstate, and local require-
ments, both substantive and procedural (including
any requirement for permits or reporting or any pro-
vision for injunctive relief and such sanctions as may
be imposed by a court to enforce such relief), re-
garding response or restoration actions related to
the release or potential release of hazardous sub-
stances, pollutants, or contaminants in the same
manner, and to the same extent, as any nongovern-
mental entity is subject to such requirements, in-
cluding enforcement and liability under sections 106
and 107 of this title and the payment of reasonable
service charges.
V
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2011
For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 24, 2001
Ms. WOOLSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ZHENFU
GE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, Zhenfu Ge shall be eligible for issuance of an immi-
grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien
lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec-
tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful
permanent resident.
(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Zhenfu Ge enters
the United States before the filing deadline specified in
subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered and
remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi-
ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact-
ment of this Act.
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Zhenfu Ge, the Secretary of State shall instruct
the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or
next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant
visas that are made available to natives of the country of
the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the
country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such
Act.
Æ
‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE STATES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec-
tion, a State is an eligible State for a fiscal year if—
‘‘(A) in the case of fiscal year 2005, the 
State has significantly exceeded the national 
standard then in effect under paragraph (2) for 
at least 4 of the outcome measures described in 
paragraph (3), and has met the national stand-
ard then in effect for the other outcome meas-
ures so described; 
‘‘(B) in the case of fiscal year 2006, the 
State has significantly exceeded the national 
standard then in effect under paragraph (2) for 
at least 5 of the outcome measures so de-
scribed, and has met the national standard then 
in effect for the other outcome measure so de-
scribed; and 
‘‘(C) in the case of fiscal years 2007 and 
2008, the State has significantly exceeded the 
national standard then in effect under para-
graph (2) for all of the outcome measures so 
described. 
‘‘(2) NATIONAL
STANDARDS.—The Secretary 
shall prescribe, and from time to time update, a na-
tional standard for each outcome measure described 
in paragraph (3). 
‘‘(3) 
OUTCOME
MEASURES.—The 
outcome 
measures described in this paragraph are the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(A) The percentage of children in foster 
care in a State during a year, who were the 
subject of substantiated or indicated maltreat-
ment by a foster parent or facility staff mem-
ber. 
‘‘(B) The percentage of children reunified 
with their parents or caretakers at the time of 
discharge from foster care in a State during a 
year, who were so reunified less than 12 months 
after their latest removal from the home. 
‘‘(C) The percentage of children entering 
foster care in a State during a year, who re-en-
tered foster care within 12 months after a prior 
discharge from foster care. 
‘‘(D) The percentage of children exiting 
foster care in a State to a finalized adoption 
during a year, who so exited less than 24 
months after their latest removal from the 
home.
‘‘(1) 50 percent for fiscal year 2004; 
‘‘(2) 55 percent for fiscal year 2005; 
‘‘(3) 60 percent for fiscal year 2006; 
‘‘(4) 65 percent for fiscal year 2007; and 
‘‘(5) 70 percent for fiscal year 2008 and each 
succeeding fiscal year. 
‘‘(b) CALCULATION OF PARTICIPATION RATES.—
‘‘(1) AVERAGE MONTHLY RATE.—For purposes 
of subsection (a), the participation rate of a State 
for a fiscal year is the average of the participation 
rates of the State for each month in the fiscal year. 
‘‘(2) MONTHLY PARTICIPATION RATES; INCOR-
PORATION OF 40-HOUR WORK WEEK STANDARD.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para-
graph (1), the participation rate of a State for 
a month is—
‘‘(i) the total number of countable 
hours (as defined in subsection (c)) with 
respect to the counted families for the 
State for the month; divided by 
‘‘(ii) 160 multiplied by the number of 
counted families for the State for the 
month. 
‘‘(B) COUNTED FAMILIES DEFINED.—
SECTION 1. EQUITABLE APPLICATION OF EARLY RETIRE-
MENT ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS TO MILI-
TARY RESERVE TECHNICIANS.
(a) TECHNICIANS COVERED BY FERS.—Paragraph
(1) of section 8414(c) of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘after becoming 50 years of age and
completing 25 years of service’’ and inserting ‘‘after com-
pleting 25 years of service or after becoming 50 years of
age and completing 20 years of service’’.
(b) TECHNICIANS
COVERED
BY
CSRS.—Section
8336 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(p) Section 8414(c) of this title applies—
‘‘(1) under paragraph (1) of such section to a
military reserve technician described in that para-
graph for purposes of determining entitlement to an
annuity under this subchapter; and
‘‘(2) under paragraph (2) of such section to a
military technician (dual status) described in that
paragraph for purposes of determining entitlement
to an annuity under this subchapter.’’.
(c) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (c) of section 8414
of title 5, United States Code (as amended by subsection
(a)), and subsection (p) of section 8336 of such title (as
added by subsection (b)), shall apply according to the pro-
visions thereof with respect to separations from service re-
ferred to in such subsections that occur on or after Octo-
ber 5, 1999.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2016
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 to ensure full Federal compliance with that Act.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 25, 2001
Ms. DEGETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently deter-
mined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to ensure full Fed-
eral compliance with that Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Facility Super-
fund Compliance Act of 2001’’.
such standard or requirement would be applied to
any other person.
‘‘(G)(i) The Administrator may issue an order
under section 106 of this Act to any department,
agency, or instrumentality of the executive, legisla-
tive, or judicial branch of the United States. The
Administrator shall initiate an administrative en-
forcement action against such a department, agency,
or instrumentality in the same manner and under
the same circumstances as an action would be initi-
ated against any other person.
‘‘(ii) No administrative order issued to such de-
partment, agency, or instrumentality shall become
final until such department, agency, or instrumen-
tality has had the opportunity to confer with the Ad-
ministrator.
‘‘(iii) Unless a State law in effect on the date
of enactment of the Federal Facility Superfund
Compliance Act of 2001, or a State constitution, re-
quires the funds to be used in a different manner,
all funds collected by a State from the Federal Gov-
ernment from penalties and fines imposed for viola-
tion of any substantive or procedural requirement
referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall be
used by the State only for projects designed to im-
prove or protect the environment or to defray the
costs of environmental protection or enforcement.
‘‘(H) Each such department, agency, and in-
strumentality shall have the right to contribution
protection set forth in section 113, when such de-
partment, agency, or instrumentality resolves its li-
ability under this Act.’’.
(3) By striking paragraph (4) of subsection (a).
(4) By inserting ‘‘(other than the indemnifica-
tion requirements of section 119)’’ after ‘‘responsi-
bility’’ in subsection (a)(3).
(5) By adding at the end of subsection (e) the
following new paragraph:
‘‘(7) STATE REQUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Act, an interagency
agreement under this section shall in no way impair
or diminish the authority of any State to enforce
compliance with requirements of State law, unless
such requirements have been specifically—
‘‘(A) addressed; or
‘‘(B) waived;
without objection from the State before or on the
date on which the response action is selected.’’.
Æ
‘‘(E) The percentage of children reported 
to be victims of substantiated or indicated child 
abuse or neglect in the State during the first 6 
months of a period being reviewed, who were 
the subject of another such report within 6 
months after the first report. 
‘‘(F) The percentage of children in foster 
care for less than 12 months from the time of 
their latest removal from the home, who have 
been placed in not more than 2 settings. 
‘‘(4) DETERMINATION OF STATE PERFORMANCE 
WITH
RESPECT
TO
A
NATIONAL
STANDARD.—For 
purposes of paragraph (1): 
‘‘(A) MEETING
A
STANDARD.—A State 
shall be considered to have met the national 
standard for an outcome measure described in 
paragraph (3) if the percentage (referred to in 
the outcome measure) achieved by the State 
is—
‘‘(i) in the case of an outcome meas-
ure described in subparagraph (A), (C), or 
(E) of paragraph (3), not more than the 
national standard; or 
‘‘(ii) in the case of an outcome meas-
ure described in subparagraph (B), (D), or
(F) of paragraph (3), not less than the na-
tional standard. 
‘‘(B) 
SIGNIFICANTLY
EXCEEDING
A 
STANDARD.—A State shall be considered to 
have significantly exceeded the national stand-
ard for an outcome measure described in para-
graph (3) if the percentage (referred to in the 
outcome measure) achieved by the State is—
‘‘(i) in the case of an outcome meas-
ure described in subparagraph (A), (C), or 
(E) of paragraph (3), not more than 90 
percent of the national standard; or 
‘‘(ii) in the case of an outcome meas-
ure described in subparagraph (B), (D), or 
(F) of paragraph (3), not less than 110 
percent of the national standard. 
‘‘(C) INFORMATION TO BE CONSIDERED.—
In determining the performance of a State with 
respect to an outcome measure described in 
paragraph (3), the Secretary shall use informa-
tion for the most recent year for which the rel-
evant information is available. 
‘‘(c) GRANT AMOUNT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the grant 
payable to an eligible State under this section for a
fiscal year is an amount equal to the State share of 
the dollar amount specified in subsection (e). 
‘‘(2) STATE
SHARE
DEFINED.—In paragraph 
(1), the term ‘State share’ means, with respect to a 
State and a fiscal year, the percentage equal to—
‘‘(A) the number of children residing in the 
State who have not attained 21 years of age, 
determined on the basis of the information 
available as of the beginning of the fiscal year; 
divided by 
‘‘(B) the number of such children residing 
in all States, as so determined. 
‘‘(d) USE OF GRANT.—A State to which a grant is 
made under this section shall use the grant for any pur-
pose under the State plan developed under this part or 
the State plan approved under part E. 
‘‘(e) APPROPRIATION.—Out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, 
there are appropriated $100,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2005 through 2008 for grants under this section. 
‘‘(f) BUDGET SCORING.—Notwithstanding section 
257(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Contol Act of 1985, the baseline shall assume that no 
grant shall be made under this section after fiscal year 
2008.’’.
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In subparagraph 
(A), the term ‘counted family’ means, with 
respect to a State and a month, a family 
that includes a work-eligible individual and 
that receives assistance in the month under 
the State program funded under this part, 
subject to clause (ii). 
‘‘(ii) STATE
OPTION
TO
EXCLUDE 
CERTAIN
FAMILIES.—At the option of a 
State, the term ‘counted family’ shall not 
include—
‘‘(I) a family in the first month 
for which the family receives assist-
ance from a State program funded 
under this part on the basis of the 
most recent application for such as-
sistance; or 
‘‘(II) on a case-by-case basis, a 
family in which the youngest child has 
not attained 12 months of age. 
‘‘(iii) STATE OPTION TO INCLUDE IN-
DIVIDUALS RECEIVING ASSISTANCE UNDER 
A
TRIBAL
FAMILY
ASSISTANCE
PLAN
OR 
TRIBAL WORK PROGRAM.—At the option of 
a State, the term ‘counted family’ may in-