110 
SEC. 211. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE 
PLAN. 
(a) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary shall conduct an 
assessment of the water resources needs of the Upper Mis-
sissippi River under section 729 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a). 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall carry out 
the assessment under subsection (a) in accordance with 
the requirements in section 1206(b) of Water Resources 
Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1686). 
SEC. 212. LOWER MISSOURI BASIN FLOOD RISK AND RESIL-
IENCY STUDY, IOWA, KANSAS, NEBRASKA, 
AND MISSOURI. 
(a) ADDITIONAL STUDIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), upon the request of the non-Federal in-
terest for the Lower Missouri Basin study, the Sec-
retary shall expand the scope of such study to inves-
tigate and provide recommendations relating to— 
(A) modifications to projects in Iowa, Kan-
sas, Nebraska, and Missouri authorized under 
the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program 
(authorized by section 9(b) of the Flood Control 
Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 
Stat. 891)) and the Missouri River Bank Sta-
bilization and Navigation project (authorized by
111 
section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 
19, 59 Stat. 19)), including modifications to the 
authorized purposes of such projects to further 
flood risk management and resiliency; and 
(B) modifications to non-Federal, publicly 
owned levees in the Lower Missouri River 
Basin. 
(2) EXCEPTION.—If the Secretary determines 
that expanding the scope of the Lower Missouri 
Basin study as provided in paragraph (1) is not 
practicable, and the non-Federal interest for such 
study concurs in such determination, the Secretary 
shall carry out such additional studies as are nec-
essary to investigate the modifications described in 
paragraph (1). 
(3) CONTINUATION OF LOWER MISSOURI BASIN 
STUDY.—The following studies shall be considered a 
continuation of the Lower Missouri Basin study: 
(A) Any additional study carried out under 
paragraph (2). 
(B) Any study recommended to be carried 
out in a report that the Chief of Engineers pre-
pares for the Lower Missouri Basin study. 
(C) Any study recommended to be carried 
out in a report that the Chief of Engineers pre-
112 
pares for an additional study carried out under 
paragraph (2). 
(D) Any study spun off from the Lower 
Missouri Basin study before the completion of 
such study. 
(E) Any study spun off from an additional 
study carried out under paragraph (2) before 
the completion of such additional study. 
(4) RELIANCE ON EXISTING INFORMATION.—In 
carrying out any study described in or authorized by 
this section, the Secretary, to the extent practicable, 
shall rely on existing data and analysis, including 
data and analysis prepared under section 22 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d–16). 
(5) CONSIDERATION; CONSULTATION.—In de-
veloping recommendations under paragraph (1), the 
Secretary shall— 
(A) consider the use of— 
(i) structural and nonstructural meas-
ures, including the setting back of levees 
and removing structures from areas of re-
curring flood vulnerability, where advan-
tageous, to reduce flood risk and damages 
in the Lower Missouri River Basin; and
113 
(ii) where such features are locally ac-
ceptable, natural features or nature-based 
features (as such terms are defined in sec-
tion 1184 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a); and 
(B) consult with applicable Federal and 
State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stake-
holders within the Lower Missouri River Basin 
and solicit public comment on such rec-
ommendations. 
(6) EXEMPTION FROM MAXIMUM STUDY COST 
AND DURATION LIMITATIONS.—Section 1001 of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to the 
Lower Missouri Basin study or any study described 
in paragraph (3). 
(7) PRECONSTRUCTION, 
ENGINEERING, 
AND 
DESIGN.—Upon completion of a study authorized by 
this section, if the Secretary determines that a rec-
ommended project, or modification to a project de-
scribed in paragraph (1), is justified, the Secretary 
may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, 
engineering, and design of the project or modifica-
tion. 
(8) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—
114 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—For the provision of 
technical assistance to support small commu-
nities and economically disadvantaged commu-
nities in the planning and design of flood risk 
management and flood risk resiliency projects 
in the Lower Missouri River Basin, for each of 
fiscal years 2021 through 2026, there are au-
thorized to be appropriated— 
(i) $2,000,000 to carry out section 
206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 709a), in addition to amounts oth-
erwise authorized to carry out such sec-
tion; and 
(ii) $2,000,000 to carry out section 
22(a)(2) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–16), 
in addition to amounts otherwise author-
ized to carry out such section. 
(B) CONDITIONS.— 
(i) LIMITATIONS NOT APPLICABLE.— 
The limitations on the use of funds in sec-
tion 206(d) of the Flood Control Act of 
1960 and section 22(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 shall
115 
not apply to the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by subparagraph (A). 
(ii) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Noth-
ing in this paragraph restricts the author-
ity of the Secretary to use any funds other-
wise appropriated to carry out section 206 
of the Flood Control Act of 1960 or sec-
tion 22(a)(2) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1974 to provide technical 
assistance described in subparagraph (A). 
(9) COMPLETION OF STUDY; REPORT TO CON-
GRESS.—Not later than 3 years after the date of en-
actment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report detailing— 
(A) the results of the study authorized by 
this section; 
(B) any additional, site-specific areas with-
in the Lower Missouri River Basin for which 
additional study for flood risk management 
projects is recommended by the Secretary; and
116 
(C) any interim actions relating to existing 
water resources development projects under-
taken by the Secretary during the study period. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) LOWER MISSOURI BASIN STUDY.—The term 
‘‘Lower Missouri Basin study’’ means the Lower 
Missouri Basin Flood Risk and Resiliency Study, 
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri, authorized 
pursuant to section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 
1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a). 
(2) SMALL
COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘small 
community’’ means a local government that serves a 
population of less than 15,000. 
SEC. 213. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER 
AND RYE HARBOR, NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a writ-
ten status update regarding— 
(1) efforts to address the impacts of shoaling 
affecting the project for navigation, Rye Harbor, 
New Hampshire, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480); and 
(2) the project for navigation, Portsmouth Har-
bor and Piscataqua River, authorized by section 101 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat.
117 
1173), as required to be expedited under section 
1317 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (Public Law 115–270). 
SEC. 214. COUGAR AND DETROIT DAMS, WILLAMETTE 
RIVER BASIN, OREGON. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Envi-
ronment and Public Works of the Senate, and make pub-
licly available, a report providing an initial analysis of 
deauthorizing hydropower as a project purpose at the Cou-
gar and Detroit Dams project. 
(b) CONTENTS.—The Secretary shall include in the 
report submitted under subsection (a)— 
(1) a description of the potential effects of 
deauthorizing hydropower as a project purpose at 
the Cougar and Detroit Dams project on— 
(A) the operation of the project, including 
with respect to the other authorized purposes of 
the project; 
(B) compliance of the project with the En-
dangered Species Act;
118 
(C) costs that would be attributed to other 
authorized purposes of the project, including 
costs relating to compliance with such Act; and 
(D) other ongoing studies in the Willam-
ette River Basin; and 
(2) identification of any further research need-
ed. 
(c) PROJECT DEFINED.—In this section, the terms 
‘‘Cougar and Detroit Dams project’’ and ‘‘project’’ mean 
the Cougar Dam and Reservoir project and Detroit Dam 
and Reservoir project, Willamette River Basin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 179). 
SEC. 215. PORT ORFORD, OREGON. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall, at Federal expense, submit 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a summary 
report on the research completed and data gathered by 
the date of enactment of this Act with regards to the con-
figuration of a breakwater for the project for navigation, 
Port Orford, Oregon, authorized by section 117 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1822; 106 Stat.
119 
4809), for the purposes of addressing shoaling issues to 
minimize long-term maintenance costs. 
SEC. 216. WILSON CREEK AND SLOAN CREEK, FAIRVIEW, 
TEXAS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
written status update regarding efforts to address flooding 
along Wilson Creek and Sloan Creek in the City of Fair-
view, Texas. 
SEC. 217. GAO STUDY ON MITIGATION FOR WATER RE-
SOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. 
Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall— 
(1) conduct a study on the mitigation of the im-
pact of water resources development projects, includ-
ing the impact on fish and wildlife, consistent with 
the requirements of section 906 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), 
section 307(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2317(a)), and section 
2036(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (33 U.S.C. 2283a), including— 
(A) an evaluation of guidance or instruc-
tions issued, and other measures taken, by the
120 
Secretary to ensure successful mitigation of 
such impacts; 
(B) a review of the methods of mitigation, 
including the use of in-lieu fees, mitigation 
banking, and permittee-responsible mitigation, 
and their long-term effectiveness of restoring or 
mitigating ecosystem services impacted by such 
projects; 
(C) a review of how the use of the different 
mitigation methods for such projects varies 
across Corps of Engineers districts; 
(D) an assessment of the backlog of miti-
gation projects, including the number of mitiga-
tion projects pending completion to address 
such impacts resulting from constructed water 
resources development projects; 
(E) an evaluation of how the Secretary 
tracks compliance with the mitigation require-
ments across Corps of Engineers districts; 
(F) a review of how the mitigation require-
ments for water resources development projects 
contributes to the resilience of water resources 
in the United States; 
(G) an assessment of whether mitigation is 
being done prior to or contemporaneously with
121 
the construction of projects, as required by sec-
tion 906 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283); 
(H) an evaluation of compliance with sec-
tion 906(d) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) for the 
development of specific mitigation plans for 
projects, whether such plans were successful in 
mitigating the designated impacts of the 
projects, and, in instances where such plans 
were not successful, what actions the Secretary 
is taking to modify the plans such that they will 
be successful; and 
(I) an assessment of how the Secretary 
might take advantage of natural infrastructure 
in mitigation planning to reduce flood risks and 
flood recovery costs for some communities; and 
(2) submit to Congress a report that— 
(A) describes the results of the study con-
ducted under paragraph (1); 
(B) includes recommendations to ensure 
compliance with and successful implementation 
of mitigation requirements for water resources 
development projects; and
122 
(C) includes recommendations to ensure 
existing programs and authorities include the 
use, to the maximum extent practicable, of nat-
ural infrastructure. 
SEC. 218. GAO STUDY ON APPLICATION OF HARBOR MAIN-
TENANCE TRUST FUND EXPENDITURES. 
(a) STUDY.—Not later than 18 months after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall conduct a study of the operation and 
maintenance needs of federally authorized harbor and in-
land harbor projects, including— 
(1) an inventory of all federally authorized har-
bor and inland harbor projects; 
(2) an assessment of current uses of such 
projects (and, to the extent practicable, the national, 
regional, and local benefits of such uses), including 
the uses listed in section 210(d)(2)(B) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986; 
(3) an assessment of the annual operation and 
maintenance needs associated with harbors and in-
land harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2) of sec-
tion 210 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238), including a breakdown of 
such needs for each of the following types of 
projects—
123 
(A) emerging harbor projects (as defined 
in such section); 
(B) moderate-use harbor projects (as de-
fined in such section on the day before the date 
of enactment of this Act); 
(C) high-use harbor projects (as defined in 
such section on the day before the date of en-
actment of this Act); and 
(D) projects assigned to harbors and in-
land harbors within the Great Lakes Navigation 
System (as defined in such section); 
(4) an assessment of any deferred operation 
and maintenance needs for such projects; 
(5) an assessment of the annual funding level 
trends for moderate-use harbor projects (as defined 
in section 210 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 on the day before the date of enactment 
of this Act) after the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 
113–121), excluding funds awarded to donor ports, 
medium-sized donor ports, and energy transfer ports 
(as such terms are defined in section 2106 of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201));
124 
(6) an assessment of projected needs associated 
with donor ports, medium-sized donor ports, and en-
ergy transfer ports (as such terms are defined in 
section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201)); and 
(7) an itemization of expenditures provided to 
donor ports, medium-sized donor ports, and energy 
transfer ports under section 2106 of the Water Re-
sources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 
U.S.C. 2201). 
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Upon completion of the 
report under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall 
submit such report to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate. 
SEC. 219. GAO STUDY ON ADMINISTRATION OF ENVIRON-
MENTAL BANKS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 
of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to 
the appropriate committees of Congress a report that ana-
lyzes the administration of section 309 of the Coastal Wet-
lands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act to estab-
125 
lish an environmental bank (as defined in such section), 
such that the Secretary— 
(1) achieves the objectives of the report of the 
Chief of Engineers for ecosystem restoration in the 
Louisiana Coastal Area or the objectives of the com-
prehensive coastal protection master plan entitled 
‘‘Louisiana Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sus-
tainable Coast’’ prepared by the State of Louisiana 
and accepted by the Louisiana Coastal Protection 
and Restoration Authority (including any subsequent 
amendments or revisions); 
(2) promotes ridge restoration, barrier island 
restoration, marsh creation, nonstructural risk man-
agement, or any other projects authorized, funded, 
or undertaken, or proposed to be authorized, funded, 
or undertaken, pursuant to such comprehensive 
coastal protection master plan; 
(3) allows for proactive investment in projects 
by a public or private entity seeking to generate 
credits to satisfy responsibilities associated with en-
vironmental compliance; 
(4) allows for leveraging additional State, Par-
ish, or Federal funds; and
126 
(5) recommends methods for awarding addi-
tional credit for high-priority projects listed in the 
report and plan described in paragraph (1). 
(b) CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS.—In car-
rying out subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall consult with the Secretary, the Lou-
isiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration 
Task Force, the Governor of Louisiana (or an appointee), 
and other stakeholders, to the extent practicable. 
SEC. 220. STUDY ON CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONCES-
SIONAIRE AGREEMENTS. 
(a) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall conduct, and submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate a report on the results of, 
a study on commercial concessionaires at Corps of Engi-
neers recreational facilities. 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study under subsection 
(a) shall include— 
(1) an analysis of Corps of Engineers policies 
as they relate to the pricing of items sold by com-
mercial concessionaires at Corps of Engineers rec-
127 
reational facilities, including commoditized goods 
such as fuel and food items; 
(2) an assessment of the impact of gross rev-
enue fees on— 
(A) the sales of items described in para-
graph (1); 
(B) the total revenues collected by com-
mercial concessionaires at Corps of Engineers 
recreational facilities; and 
(C) the amounts of the moneys paid by 
such concessionaires to the United States— 
(i) amounts equivalent to which are 
appropriated to the Corps of Engineers for 
operation and maintenance of recreational 
facilities; or 
(ii) that are distributed to States and 
counties under section 7 of the Act of Au-
gust 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701c–3); 
(3) an assessment of the potential impact of 
using a fixed revenue fee on the sales, revenues, and 
amounts described in paragraph (2); 
(4) an analysis of Corps of Engineers policies 
related to the length of commercial concessionaire 
contracts;
128 
(5) an assessment of the impacts of changing 
the length of commercial concessionaire contracts to 
a minimum of 25 years, including assessment of— 
(A) the potential effects on monetary in-
vestment in Corps of Engineers properties by 
commercial concessionaires, including whether 
establishing such a minimum contract length 
would lead to increased investment; and 
(B) whether establishing such a minimum 
contract length would reduce competition, or re-
sult in commercial concessionaires providing 
less value to the public or to water resources 
development projects; and 
(6) an assessment of whether changes in the 
concessionaire fee structure or the minimum length 
of a commercial concessionaire contract is in the 
public interest. 
SEC. 221. STUDY ON WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CON-
SERVATION AT WATER RESOURCES DEVEL-
OPMENT PROJECTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall sub-
mit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc-
ture of the House of the Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate
129 
a report that analyzes the benefits and consequences of 
including municipal water supply and water conservation 
as a primary mission of the Corps of Engineers in carrying 
out water resources development projects. 
(b) INCLUSION.—The Secretary shall include in the 
report submitted under subsection (a)— 
(1) a description of existing water resources de-
velopment projects with municipal water supply or 
water conservation as authorized purposes, and the 
extent to which such projects are utilized for such 
purposes; 
(2) a description of existing water resources de-
velopment projects with respect to which— 
(A) municipal water supply or water con-
servation could be added as a project purpose, 
including those with respect to which a non- 
Federal interest has expressed an interest in 
adding municipal water supply or water con-
servation as a project purpose; and 
(B) such a purpose could be accommodated 
while maintaining existing authorized purposes; 
(3) a description of ongoing water resources de-
velopment project studies the authorizations for 
which include authorization for the Secretary to 
study the feasibility of carrying out the project with
130 
a purpose of municipal water supply or water con-
servation; 
(4) an analysis of how adding municipal water 
supply and water conservation as a primary mission 
of the Corps of Engineers would affect the ability of 
the Secretary to carry out future water resources de-
velopment projects; and 
(5) any recommendations of the Secretary relat-
ing to including municipal water supply and water 
conservation as a primary mission of the Corps of 
Engineers. 
SEC. 222. PFAS REVIEW AND INVENTORY AT CORPS FACILI-
TIES. 
(a) INVENTORY OF PFAS AT CORPS FACILITIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months 
after the date of enactment of this section, and an-
nually thereafter the Secretary shall complete an in-
ventory of Corps of Engineers civil works facilities 
that are or may be contaminated, or could become 
contaminated, by PFAS. 
(2) CONTENTS
OF
INVENTORY.—In carrying 
out this subsection, the Secretary shall review and 
identify— 
(A) all facilities owned or operated by the 
Corps of Engineers, for which there is a civil
131 
works function, that are or may be contami-
nated, or could become contaminated, by 
PFAS; 
(B) the nature and extent of any such con-
tamination or potential for contamination, in-
cluding any potential pathways for human expo-
sure to PFAS; 
(C) response measures taken to monitor, 
control, remove, or remediate PFAS, or other-
wise reduce the risk of human exposure to 
PFAS; 
(D) for facilities identified under subpara-
graph (A), the extent to which such facilities 
(or any such contamination or potential for con-
tamination at such facilities) are related to the 
civil works functions of the Corps of Engineers; 
(E) the extent to which the Secretary, or 
other entities, may have responsibility for such 
contamination or potential for contamination; 
and 
(F) for facilities identified under subpara-
graph (A), the costs to remediate and reduce 
the risk of human exposure to PFAS. 
(3) COORDINATION
WITH
OTHER
FEDERAL 
AGENCIES.—To the maximum extent practicable, the
132 
actions taken under this subsection shall supplement 
and support work undertaken by other Federal 
agencies, including actions taken pursuant to the 
plan published by the Administrator of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency, titled ‘‘EPA’s Per- and 
Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Action Plan’’ 
and dated February 2019. 
(4) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Upon completion 
of the inventory under paragraph (1), and annually 
thereafter concurrent with the President’s annual 
budget request to Congress, the Secretary shall sub-
mit the inventory to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent-
atives and the Committee on Environment and Pub-
lic Works of the Senate. 
(b) PFAS TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH.— 
(1) RESEARCH SUPPORT.—The Secretary, act-
ing through the Hazardous Waste Research Center 
located at the Engineer Research and Development 
Center, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, 
support the efforts of other Federal agencies in the 
development of innovative technologies and meth-
odologies for the detection, treatment, and cleanup 
of PFAS associated with Federal facilities, including 
groundwater associated with such facilities.
133 
(2) DUPLICATION
OF
EFFORTS.—Nothing in 
this subsection is intended to duplicate the activities 
undertaken by other Federal agencies as identified 
in subsection (a)(3). 
(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘PFAS’’ 
means a perfluoroalkyl substance or polyfluoroalkyl sub-
stance with at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom. 
SEC. 223. REPORT ON RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. 
No later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate a report that contains— 
(1) an inventory of all recreational infrastruc-
ture and facilities associated with water resources 
development projects; 
(2) an assessment of the annual operation and 
maintenance needs associated with such infrastruc-
ture and facilities; 
(3) an assessment of deferred operation and 
maintenance needs for such infrastructure and facili-
ties to operate safely at full capacity; and 
(4) an assessment of the economic benefits of 
recreation to local and regional economies and bene-
134 
fits of sustaining and improving public access at rec-
reational infrastructure and facilities. 
TITLE III—DEAUTHORIZATIONS 
AND MODIFICATIONS 
SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS. 
(a) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this section are— 
(1) to identify water resources development 
projects authorized by Congress that are no longer 
viable for construction due to— 
(A) a lack of local support; 
(B) a lack of available Federal or non-Fed-
eral resources; or 
(C) an authorizing purpose that is no 
longer relevant or feasible; 
(2) to create an expedited and definitive process 
for Congress to deauthorize water resources develop-
ment projects that are no longer viable for construc-
tion; and 
(3) to allow the continued authorization of 
water resources development projects that are viable 
for construction. 
(b) PROPOSED DEAUTHORIZATION LIST.— 
(1) PRELIMINARY LIST OF PROJECTS.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall de-
velop a preliminary list of each water resources
135 
development project, or separable element of a 
project, authorized for construction before No-
vember 8, 2007, for which— 
(i) planning, design, or construction 
was not initiated before the date of enact-
ment of this Act; or 
(ii) planning, design, or construction 
was initiated before the date of enactment 
of this Act, but for which no funds, Fed-
eral or non-Federal, were obligated for 
planning, design, or construction of the 
project or separable element of the project 
during the current fiscal year or any of the 
10 preceding fiscal years. 
(B) USE OF COMPREHENSIVE CONSTRUC-
TION BACKLOG AND OPERATION AND MAINTE-
NANCE
REPORT.—The Secretary may develop 
the preliminary list from the comprehensive 
construction backlog and operation and mainte-
nance reports developed pursuant to section 
1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a). 
(2) PREPARATION OF PROPOSED DEAUTHORIZA-
TION LIST.—
136 
(A) 
DEAUTHORIZATION
AMOUNT.—The 
Secretary shall prepare a proposed list of 
projects for deauthorization comprised of a sub-
set of projects and separable elements identified 
on the preliminary list developed under para-
graph (1) that have, in the aggregate, an esti-
mated Federal cost to complete that is at least 
$10,000,000,000. 
(B) DETERMINATION
OF
FEDERAL
COST 
TO COMPLETE.—For purposes of subparagraph 
(A), the Federal cost to complete shall take into 
account any allowances authorized by section 
902 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to the 
most recent project schedule and cost estimate. 
(C) INCLUSION OF DEAUTHORIZATION OF 
ANTIQUATED
PROJECTS.—The Secretary shall 
reduce the amount identified for deauthoriza-
tion under paragraph (2)(A) by an amount 
equivalent to the estimated current value of 
each project, or separable element of a project, 
that is deauthorized by subsection (f). 
(3) SEQUENCING OF PROJECTS.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 
identify projects and separable elements for in-
137 
clusion on the proposed list of projects for de-
authorization under paragraph (2) according to 
the order in which the projects and separable 
elements were authorized, beginning with the 
earliest authorized projects and separable ele-
ments and ending with the latest project or sep-
arable element necessary to meet the aggregate 
amount under paragraph (2)(A). 
(B) FACTORS
TO
CONSIDER.—The Sec-
retary may identify projects and separable ele-
ments in an order other than that established 
by subparagraph (A) if the Secretary deter-
mines, on a case-by-case basis, that a project or 
separable element is critical for interests of the 
United States, based on the possible impact of 
the project or separable element on public 
health and safety, the national economy, or the 
environment. 
(4) PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSULTATION.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall so-
licit comments from the public and the Gov-
ernors of each applicable State on the proposed 
deauthorization list prepared under paragraph 
(2)(A).
138 
(B) COMMENT PERIOD.—The public com-
ment period shall be 90 days. 
(5) PREPARATION OF FINAL DEAUTHORIZATION 
LIST.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 
prepare a final deauthorization list by— 
(i) considering any comments received 
under paragraph (4); and 
(ii) revising the proposed deauthoriza-
tion list prepared under paragraph (2)(A) 
as the Secretary determines necessary to 
respond to such comments. 
(B) APPENDIX.—The Secretary shall in-
clude as part of the final deauthorization list an 
appendix that— 
(i) identifies each project or separable 
element on the proposed deauthorization 
list that is not included on the final de-
authorization list; and 
(ii) describes the reasons why the 
project or separable element is not in-
cluded on the final deauthorization list. 
(c) SUBMISSION OF FINAL DEAUTHORIZATION LIST 
TO CONGRESS FOR CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW; PUBLICA-
TION.—
139 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the close of the comment period under 
subsection (b)(4), the Secretary shall— 
(A) submit the final deauthorization list 
and appendix prepared under subsection (b)(5) 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate; and 
(B) publish the final deauthorization list 
and appendix in the Federal Register. 
(2) EXCLUSIONS.—The Secretary shall not in-
clude in the final deauthorization list submitted 
under paragraph (1) any project or separable ele-
ment with respect to which Federal funds for plan-
ning, design, or construction are obligated after the 
development of the preliminary list under subsection 
(b)(1)(A) but prior to the submission of the final de-
authorization list under paragraph (1)(A) of this 
subsection. 
(d) DEAUTHORIZATION; CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—After the expiration of the 
2-year period beginning on the date of publication of 
the final deauthorization list and appendix under 
subsection (c)(1)(B), a project or separable element
140 
of a project identified in the final deauthorization 
list is hereby deauthorized, unless Congress passes a 
joint resolution disapproving the final deauthoriza-
tion list prior to the end of such period. 
(2) NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—A project or separable 
element of a project identified in the final de-
authorization list under subsection (c) shall not 
be deauthorized under this subsection if, before 
the expiration of the 2-year period referred to 
in paragraph (1), the non-Federal interest for 
the project or separable element of the project 
provides sufficient funds to complete the project 
or separable element of the project. 
(B) TREATMENT OF PROJECTS.—Notwith-
standing subparagraph (A), each project and 
separable element of a project identified in the 
final deauthorization list shall be treated as de-
authorized for purposes of the aggregate de-
authorization amount specified in subsection 
(b)(2)(A). 
(3) PROJECTS
IDENTIFIED
IN
APPENDIX.—A 
project or separable element of a project identified 
in the appendix to the final deauthorization list shall
141 
remain subject to future deauthorization by Con-
gress. 
(e) SPECIAL RULES.— 
(1) POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES.—A project 
or separable element of a project may not be identi-
fied on the proposed deauthorization list developed 
under subsection (b), or the final deauthorization list 
developed under subsection (c), if the project or sep-
arable element received funding for a post-authoriza-
tion study during the current fiscal year or any of 
the 10 preceding fiscal years. 
(2) 
TREATMENT
OF
PROJECT
MODIFICA-
TIONS.—For purposes of this section, if an author-
ized water resources development project or sepa-
rable element of the project has been modified by an 
Act of Congress, the date of the authorization of the 
project or separable element shall be deemed to be 
the date of the most recent such modification. 
(f) 
DEAUTHORIZATION
OF
ANTIQUATED 
PROJECTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Any water resources devel-
opment project, or separable element of a project, 
authorized for construction prior to November 17, 
1986, for which construction has not been initiated 
prior to the date of enactment of this Act, or for
142 
which funds have not been obligated for construction 
in the 10-year period prior to the date of enactment 
of this Act, is hereby deauthorized. 
(2) IDENTIFICATION.—Not later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary shall issue to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent-
atives and the Committee on Environment and Pub-
lic Works of the Senate a report that identifies— 
(A) the name of each project, or separable 
element of a project, deauthorized by paragraph 
(1); and 
(B) the estimated current value of each 
such project or separable element of a project. 
(g) ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF IN-
ACTIVE WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.— 
The Secretary or the non-Federal interest may not carry 
out any authorized water resources development project, 
or separable element of such project, for which construc-
tion has not been initiated in the 20-year period following 
the date of the authorization of such project or separable 
element, until— 
(1) the Secretary provides to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment
143 
and Public Works of the Senate a post-authorization 
change report that updates the economic and envi-
ronmental analysis of the project or separable ele-
ment; and 
(2) the Committee on Transportation and In-
frastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate take appropriate action to address any modi-
fications to the economic and environmental analysis 
for the project or separable element of the project 
contained in the post-authorization change report. 
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) POST-AUTHORIZATION CHANGE REPORT.— 
The term ‘‘post-authorization change report’’ has 
the meaning given such term in section 1132(d) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 
U.S.C. 2282e). 
(2) POST-AUTHORIZATION
STUDY.—The term 
‘‘post-authorization study’’ means— 
(A) a feasibility report developed under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282); 
(B) a feasibility study, as defined in sec-
tion 105(d) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(d)); or
144 
(C) a review conducted under section 216 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 
549a), including an initial appraisal that— 
(i) demonstrates a Federal interest; 
and 
(ii) requires additional analysis for the 
project or separable element. 
(3) 
WATER
RESOURCES
DEVELOPMENT 
PROJECT.—The term ‘‘water resources development 
project’’ includes an environmental infrastructure 
assistance project or program of the Corps of Engi-
neers. 
SEC. 302. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RES-
TORATION. 
Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
SEC. 303. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 
Section 203(b)(4) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘$12,500,000’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘$15,000,000’’.
145 
SEC. 304. LAKES PROGRAM. 
Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662, 100 Stat. 4148; 110 
Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 Stat. 1076) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (27), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 
end; 
(2) in paragraph (28), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(29) Ellis Pond and Guild Pond, Norwood, 
Massachusetts; and 
‘‘(30) Memorial Pond, Walpole, Massachu-
setts.’’. 
SEC. 305. WATERCRAFT INSPECTION STATIONS. 
Section 104(d)(1)(A) of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610(d)(1)(A)) is amended— 
(1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and in-
serting a semicolon; 
(2) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘Arizona River 
Basins.’’ and inserting ‘‘Arkansas River Basins; 
and’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(iv) to protect the Russian River 
Basin, California.’’.
147 
environmental restoration and protection program estab-
lished under section 510 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1996, including how to participate in the pro-
gram. 
SEC. 308. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRON-
MENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 
Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended— 
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(3), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$22,750,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(4), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$10,420,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000’’. 
SEC. 309. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGA-
TION SYSTEM. 
Any Federal funds, regardless of the account from 
which the funds were provided, used to carry out construc-
tion of the modification to the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River Navigation System, authorized in section 136 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 
(117 Stat. 1842), shall be considered by the Secretary as 
initiating construction of the project such that future 
funds will not require a new investment decision.
148 
SEC. 310. OUACHITA-BLACK RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, 
ARKANSAS. 
The project for navigation, Ouachita-Black River, Ar-
kansas, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (Public Law 86–645), is modified to include 
water supply as a project purpose, subject to completion 
by the Secretary of a feasibility study and any other review 
necessary for such modification. 
SEC. 311. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The portion of project for flood control, Sacramento 
River, California, authorized by section 2 of the Act of 
March 1, 1917 (chapter 144, 39 Stat. 949; 103 Stat. 649; 
110 Stat. 3709; 112 Stat. 1841; 113 Stat. 299), con-
sisting of a riverbed gradient restoration facility at the 
Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Intake, is no longer au-
thorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 312. LAKE ISABELLA, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Secretary, when evaluating alternative loca-
tions for construction of a permanent Isabella Lake Vis-
itor Center by the Corps of Engineers to replace the facil-
ity impacted by the Isabella Dam safety modification 
project, should afford substantial weight to the site pref-
erence of the local community.
149 
(b) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary may acquire such 
interests in real property as the Secretary determines nec-
essary or advisable to support construction of the Isabella 
Dam safety modification project. 
(c) TRANSFER.—The Secretary may transfer any real 
property interests acquired under subsection (b) to any 
other Federal agency or department without reimburse-
ment. 
(d) ISABELLA DAM SAFETY MODIFICATION PROJECT 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Isabella Dam safety 
modification project’’ means the dam safety modification 
project at the Isabella Reservoir in the San Joaquin Val-
ley, California (authorized by Act of December 22, 1944 
(chapter 665, 58 Stat. 901)), including the component of 
the project relating to construction a visitor center facility. 
SEC. 313. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER FLOOD CONTROL 
PROJECT. 
The Secretary shall align the schedules of, and maxi-
mize complimentary efforts, minimize duplicative prac-
tices, and ensure coordination and information sharing 
with respect to— 
(1) the project for flood risk management, 
Lower San Joaquin River, authorized by section 
1401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (132 Stat. 3836); and
150 
(2) the second phase of the feasibility study for 
the Lower San Joaquin River project for flood risk 
management, authorized for expedited completion by 
section 1203(a)(7) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act 2018 (132 Stat. 3803). 
SEC. 314. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, SAN DIEGO 
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
The portion of the project for flood control and navi-
gation, San Diego River and Mission Bay, San Diego 
County, California, authorized by the Act of July 24, 1946 
(chapter 595, 60 Stat. 636), identified in the National 
Levee Database established under section 9004 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
3303) as the San Diego River 3 segment and consisting 
of a 785-foot-long segment of the right bank levee from 
Station 209+41.75 to its end at Station 217+26.75, as 
described in construction plans dated August 30, 1951, 
is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment 
of this Act. 
SEC. 315. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT 
AREA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 114 of the River and Har-
bor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 59h) is amended to read as 
follows:
151 
‘‘SEC. 114. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT 
AREA. 
‘‘(a) AREA TO BE DECLARED NONNAVIGABLE.—The 
following area is declared to be nonnavigable waters of the 
United States: All of that portion of the City and County 
of San Francisco, California, lying shoreward of a line be-
ginning at the intersection of the southerly right of way 
line of Earl Street prolongation with the Pierhead United 
States Government Pierhead line, the Pierhead line as de-
fined in the State of California Harbor and Navigation 
Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961; thence northerly 
along said Pierhead line to its intersection with a line par-
allel with and distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing 
easterly boundary line of Pier 30–32; thence northerly 
along said parallel line and its northerly prolongation, to 
a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 
10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of 
Pier 30–32; thence westerly along last said parallel line 
to its intersection with said Pierhead line; thence northerly 
along said Pierhead line, to the intersection of the easterly 
right of way line of Van Ness Avenue, formerly Marlette 
Street, prolongation to the Pierhead line. 
‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT THAT AREA BE IMPROVED.— 
The declaration of nonnavigability under subsection (a) 
applies only to those parts of the area described in sub-
section (a) that are or will be bulkheaded, filled, or other-
152 
wise occupied or covered by permanent structures and 
does not affect the applicability of any Federal statute or 
regulation that relates to filling of navigable waters or to 
other regulated activities within the area described in sub-
section (a), including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of 
March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401, 403), section 404 of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 
‘‘(c) INCLUSION OF EMBARCADERO HISTORIC DIS-
TRICT.—Congress finds and declares that the area de-
scribed in subsection (a) contains the seawall, piers, and 
wharves that comprise the Embarcadero Historic District 
listed on the National Register of Historic Places on May 
12, 2006.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5052 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
59h–1) is repealed. 
SEC. 316. WESTERN PACIFIC INTERCEPTOR CANAL, SAC-
RAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA. 
The portion of the project for flood protection on the 
Sacramento River, authorized by section 2 of the of March 
1, 1917 (chapter 144, 39 Stat. 949; 45 Stat. 539; 50 Stat. 
877; 55 Stat. 647; 80 Stat. 1422), consisting of the por-
tion of the levee from GPS coordinate N2147673.584 
E6690904.187 to N2147908.413 E6689057.060 associ-
153 
ated with the Western Pacific Interceptor Canal, is no 
longer authorized beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
SEC. 317. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND 
TEXAS. 
Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114, 121 Stat. 1213; 128 
Stat. 1314) is amended by striking ‘‘2019’’ and inserting 
‘‘2029’’. 
SEC. 318. NEW LONDON HARBOR WATERFRONT CHANNEL, 
CONNECTICUT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The portion of the project for 
navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
by the first section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (chapter 
1079, 32 Stat. 333), described in subsection (b) is no 
longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of 
this Act. 
(b) AREA DESCRIBED.—The area referred to in sub-
section (a) is generally the portion between and around 
the 2 piers at the State Pier in New London, specifically 
the area— 
(1) 
beginning 
at 
a 
point 
N691263.78, 
E1181259.26;
154 
(2) running N 35°01’50.75’’ W about 955.59 
feet to a point N692046.26, E1180710.74; 
(3) running N 54°58’06.78’’ E about 100.00 
feet to a point N692103.66, E1180792.62; 
(4) running S 35°01’50.75’’ E about 989.8 feet 
to a point N691293.17, E1181360.78; and 
(5) running S 73°51’15.45’’ W about 105.69 
feet to the point described in paragraph (1). 
SEC. 319. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 
Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
project for navigation, Washington Harbor, District of Co-
lumbia, authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 
831, 49 Stat. 1031), is modified to reduce, in part, the 
authorized dimensions of the project, such that the re-
maining authorized dimensions are as follows: 
(1) A 200 foot wide, 15 foot deep channel with 
a center line beginning at a point East 1,317,064.30 
and North 440,373.32, thence to a point East 
1,316,474.30 and North 440,028.31, thence to a 
point East 1,315,584.30 and North 439,388.30, 
thence to a point East 1,315,259.31 and North 
438,908.30. 
(2) A transition area 200 foot wide to 300 foot 
wide, 15 foot deep, with a center line beginning at
155 
a point East 1,315,259.31 and North 438,908.30 to 
a point East 1,315,044.31 and North 438,748.30. 
(3) A 300 foot wide, 15 foot deep channel with 
a centerline beginning a point East 1,315,044.31 
and North 438,748.30, thence to a point East 
1,314,105.31 and North 438,124.79, thence to a 
point East 1,311,973.30 and North 438,807.78, 
thence to a point East 1,311,369.73 and North 
438,577.42, thence to a point East 1,311,015.73 
and North 438,197.57, thence to a point East 
1,309,713.47 and North 435,678.91. 
(4) A transition area 300 foot wide to 400 foot 
wide, 15 foot deep to 24 foot deep, with a center line 
beginning at a point East 1,309,713.47 and North 
435,678.91 to a point East 1,307,709.33 and North 
434,488.25. 
(5) A 400 foot wide, 24 foot deep channel with 
a centerline beginning at a point East 1,307,709.33 
and North 434,488.25, thence to a point East 
1,307,459.33 and North 434,173.25, thence to a 
point East 1,306,476.82 and North 1,306,476.82, 
thence to a point East 1,306,209.79 and North 
431,460.21, thence to a point at the end of the 
channel near Hains Point East 1,305,997.63 and 
North 429,978.31.
156 
SEC. 320. BIG CYPRESS SEMINOLE INDIAN RESERVATION 
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN, FLORIDA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Big Cypress 
Seminole Indian Reservation Water Conservation Plan, 
Florida, authorized pursuant to section 528 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3767), is 
no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment 
of this Act. 
SEC. 321. CENTRAL EVERGLADES, FLORIDA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Central Ever-
glades, authorized by section 1401(4) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1713), is 
modified to include the project for ecosystem restoration, 
Central and Southern Florida, Everglades Agricultural 
Area, authorized by section 1308 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3819), and to author-
ize the Secretary to carry out the project as so combined. 
SEC. 322. MIAMI RIVER, FLORIDA. 
The portion of the project for navigation, Miami 
River, Florida, authorized by the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 
Stat. 925; 59 Stat. 16; 74 Stat. 481; 100 Stat. 4257), 
beginning at the existing railroad bascule bridge and ex-
tending approximately 1,000 linear feet upstream to an 
existing salinity barrier and flood control structure, is no 
longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of 
this Act.
157 
SEC. 323. JULIAN KEEN, JR. LOCK AND DAM, MOORE 
HAVEN, FLORIDA. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The Moore Haven Lock and 
Dam, Moore Haven, Florida, authorized pursuant to the 
Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1032), 
shall hereafter be known and designated as the ‘‘Julian 
Keen, Jr. Lock and Dam’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the Lock and Dam referred to in subsection (a) 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julian Keen, 
Jr. Lock and Dam’’. 
SEC. 324. TAYLOR CREEK RESERVOIR AND LEVEE L–73 
(SECTION 1), UPPER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, 
FLORIDA. 
The portions of the project for flood control and other 
purposes, Central and Southern Florida, authorized by 
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
1176), consisting of the Taylor Creek Reservoir and Levee 
L–73, Section 1, within the Upper St. Johns River Basin, 
Florida, are no longer authorized beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 325. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA. 
Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
158 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate a report on plans to modify 
the Calcasieu River and Pass Dredged Material Manage-
ment Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (December 16, 2010 DMMP/SEIS) to allow for 
the expansion of Dredged Material Placement Facilities 
(DMPFs) 17, 19, 22, D, and E to the lakeside foreshore 
rock boundaries during planned rehabilitation of these fa-
cilities. 
SEC. 326. SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT; ABIQUIU DAM, NEW 
MEXICO. 
(a) ABIQUIU RESERVOIR.—Section 5(b) of Public 
Law 97–140 (43 U.S.C. 620a note) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘a total of two hundred thousand acre-feet of’’. 
(b) WATER STORAGE AT ABIQUIU DAM, NEW MEX-
ICO.—Section 1 of Public Law 100–522 (43 U.S.C. 620a 
note) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘200,000 acre-feet of’’; 
(2) 
by 
inserting 
‘‘and 
San 
Juan-Chama 
project’’ after ‘‘Rio Grande system’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘, in lieu of the water storage 
authorized by section 5 of Public Law 97–140, to 
the extent that contracting entities under section 5 
of Public Law 97–140 no longer require such stor-
age’’.
160 
allocated for each entity’s proportionate share of 
San Juan-Chama water. 
(e) OPERATIONS DOCUMENTS.—The Secretary shall 
amend or revise any existing operations documents, in-
cluding the Water Control Manual or operations plan for 
Abiquiu Reservoir, as necessary to meet the requirements 
of this section. 
(f) LIMITATIONS.—In carrying out this section, the 
following limitations shall apply: 
(1) The storage of native Rio Grande system 
water shall be subject to the provisions of the Rio 
Grande Compact and the resolutions of the Rio 
Grande Compact Commission. 
(2) The storage of native Rio Grande system 
water shall only be authorized to the extent that the 
necessary water ownership and storage rights have 
been acquired by the entity requesting such storage. 
(3) The storage of native Rio Grande system 
water or San-Juan Chama project water shall not 
interfere with the authorized purposes of the 
Abiquiu Dam and Reservoir project. 
(4) Each user of storage space, regardless of 
source of water, shall pay for any increase in costs 
attributable to storage of that user’s water.
161 
SEC. 327. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY 
AND WATCH HILL COVE, RHODE ISLAND AND 
CONNECTICUT. 
Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, that 
portion of the project for navigation, Pawcatuck River, 
Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, Rhode Is-
land and Connecticut, authorized by section 2 of the Act 
of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 13), consisting 
of a 10-foot deep, 16-acre anchorage area in Watch Hill 
Cove is no longer authorized. 
SEC. 328. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. 
Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3789) is repealed. 
SEC. 329. CAP SANTE WATERWAY, WASHINGTON. 
Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
project for navigation, Cap Sante Waterway and Naviga-
tion Channel, Skagit County, Washington, authorized by 
the Act of March 2, 1919 (chapter 95, 40 Stat. 1285), 
is modified to deauthorize the portion of the project con-
sisting of an approximately 334,434 foot area of the Fed-
eral channel within Anacortes Harbor inside and directly 
adjacent to the Federal breakwater and training wall 
structure, 
starting 
at 
a 
point 
with 
coordinates 
N557015.552, E1210819.619, thence running S88 
13’2.06’’E approximately 200 feet to a point with coordi-
nates N557009.330, E1211019.522, thence running S01
162 
46’58.08’’W approximately 578 feet to a point with co-
ordinates N556431.405, E1211001.534, thence running 
S49 49’50.23’’W approximately 69 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556387.076, E1210949.002, thence running 
S51 53’0.25’’E approximately 35 feet to a point with co-
ordinates N556365.662, E1210976.316, thence running 
S49 38’58.48’’W approximately 112 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556292.989, E1210890.775, thence running 
N88 13’1.87’’W approximately 109 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556296.367, E1210782.226, thence running 
S46 46’58.97’’W approximately 141 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556199.527, E1210679.164, thence running 
N88 13’1.77’’W approximately 700 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556221.305, E1209979.502, thence running 
N01 46’58.08’’E approximately 250 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556471.184, E1209987.280, thence running 
S88 13’1.77’’E approximately 815 feet to a point with co-
ordinates N556445.828, E1210801.886, thence running 
N01 46’58.08’’E approximately 570 feet to the point of 
origin. 
SEC. 330. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT. 
The Secretary shall expedite the activities required to 
be carried out under section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) regarding the 
use of improvement dredging of the Portsmouth Federal
163 
navigation project in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, as a 
source of clean beach fill material to reinforce the stone 
revetment at Nantasket Beach, Hull, Massachusetts. 
SEC. 
331. 
ADDITIONAL 
ASSISTANCE 
FOR 
CRITICAL 
PROJECTS. 
(a) CONSISTENCY WITH REPORTS.—Congress finds 
that the project modifications described in this section are 
in accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by 
the Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources 
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), 
titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development’’, or have otherwise been reviewed by Con-
gress. 
(b) MODIFICATIONS.— 
(1) SACRAMENTO AREA, CALIFORNIA.—Section 
219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 
1840) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(23) 
SACRAMENTO
AREA, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$45,000,000 for regional water conservation, recy-
cling, reliability, and resiliency projects in Placer, El 
Dorado, and Sacramento Counties and the San 
Juan Suburban Water District, California.’’. 
(2) 
SOUTH
PERRIS, 
CALIFORNIA.—Section 
219(f)(52) of the Water Resources Development Act
164 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 
2763A–220) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 
(3) MADISON AND ST. CLAIR COUNTIES, ILLI-
NOIS.—Section 219(f)(55) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A–221) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
(4) SOUTHERN
AND
EASTERN
KENTUCKY.— 
Section 531 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 
Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (g), by inserting ‘‘Boyd, 
Carter, Elliott, Lincoln,’’ after ‘‘Lee,’’; and 
(B) 
in 
subsection 
(h), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$40,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$80,000,000’’. 
(5) DESOTO
COUNTY, 
MISSISSIPPI.—Section 
219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 
2763A–220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 2257; 122 
Stat. 1623) is amended by striking ‘‘$75,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$130,000,000’’. 
(6) JACKSON
COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Section 
219(e)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act
165 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 
1494; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended by striking 
‘‘$32,500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$57,500,000’’. 
(7) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—Section 219(f)(32) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 337; 121 Stat. 1233) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$35,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$70,000,000’’. 
(8) 
MIDWEST
CITY, 
OKLAHOMA.—Section 
219(f)(231) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 
Stat. 1266) is amended by striking ‘‘$2,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$5,000,000’’. 
(9) SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.—Section 
313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 
3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 
1146) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (g)(1), by striking 
‘‘$200,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$400,000,000’’; 
and 
(B) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting 
‘‘Beaver, Jefferson,’’ after ‘‘Washington,’’. 
(10) LAKES
MARION
AND
MOULTRIE, SOUTH 
CAROLINA.—Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Re-
166 
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 
113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220; 117 Stat. 
1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818) is amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$89,550,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$110,000,000’’. 
(11) 
EL
PASO
COUNTY, 
TEXAS.—Section 
219(f)(269) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 
Stat. 1268) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000’’. 
(12) WESTERN RURAL WATER.—Section 595 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 
1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 1219; 123 Stat. 
2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681) is amend-
ed— 
(A) by striking the section heading and in-
serting ‘‘WESTERN RURAL WATER.’’; 
(B) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘Ari-
zona,’’ before ‘‘rural Idaho’’; 
(C) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘Ari-
zona,’’ before ‘‘Idaho’’; and 
(D) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘for the 
period 
beginning 
with 
fiscal 
year 
2001, 
$435,000,000, to remain available until ex-
167 
pended.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘, to re-
main available until expended— 
‘‘(1) for the period beginning with fiscal year 
2001, $435,000,000 for Idaho, Montana, rural Ne-
vada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and Wyoming; and 
‘‘(2) $150,000,000 for Arizona.’’. 
(13) CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.—Section 571(h) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 371; 121 Stat. 1257) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$40,000,000’’. 
(14) 
SOUTHERN
WEST
VIRGINIA.—Section 
340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 110 Stat. 3727; 113 Stat. 
320) is amended by striking ‘‘$40,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$120,000,000’’. 
(c) LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.— 
Section 5032(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114, 121 Stat. 1205) is 
amended by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting ‘‘20’’. 
SEC. 332. PROJECT MODIFICATION AUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) WATER SUPPLY.—The following project modifica-
tions for water supply, as identified in the report entitled 
‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Develop-
ment’’ dated February 2019, and submitted to Congress