datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2291 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. 
Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 6, 2013 
Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself and Ms. WILSON of 
Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Oversight and Government Reform 
A BILL 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New 
York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. VINCENT R. SOMBROTTO POST OFFICE. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:32 Jun 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2291.IH
H2291
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto 
Post Office’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:32 Jun 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2291.IH
H2291
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 116
To limit State authority to regulate certain activities on vessels, and for
other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 4, 1995
Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To limit State authority to regulate certain activities on
vessels, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California Cruise
Industry Revitalization Act’’.
SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF CERTAIN STATE AUTHORITY OVER
VESSELS.
Section 5(b)(2) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15
U.S.C. 1175(b)(2), commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson
Act’’ is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(C) EXCLUSION
OF
CERTAIN
VOYAGES
AND SEGMENTS.—Except for a voyage or seg-
ment of a voyage that occurs within the bound-
aries of the State of Hawaii, a voyage or seg-
ment of a voyage is not described in subpara-
graph (B) if it includes or consists of a seg-
ment—
‘‘(i) that begins and ends in the same
State;
‘‘(ii) that is part of a voyage to an-
other State or to a foreign country; and
‘‘(iii) in which the vessel reaches the
other State or foreign country within 3
days after leaving the State in which it
begins.’’.
Æ
challenges the constitutionality of a State law adopted by
referendum shall be heard and determined by a court of
3 judges in accordance with section 2284 of title 28,
United States Code, and any appeal of such action shall
be to the Supreme Court. In any such action, the addi-
tional judges who will serve on the 3-judge court shall be
designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28, United
States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court shall
expedite the consideration of the action.
(b) INJUNCTIONS AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF STATE
LAW.—An interlocutory or permanent injunction restrain-
ing the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law
adopted by referendum shall not be granted by a district
court or judge thereof upon the ground of the unconsti-
tutionality of such State law unless the application for the
injunction is heard and determined by a court of 3 judges
convened pursuant to subsection (a). For purposes of sub-
section (a), the term ‘‘action’’ includes an application for
an injunction described in this subsection.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act—
(1) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several
States and the District of Columbia;
(2) the term ‘‘State law’’ means the constitu-
tion of a State, or any ordinance, rule, regulation,
HR 2291 RFS 
SECTION 1. VINCENT R. SOMBROTTO POST OFFICE. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto 
Post Office’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:16 Jul 16, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2291.RFS
H2291
tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1170
AN ACT
To provide that an application for an injunction restraining
the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law
adopted by referendum may not be granted on the
ground of the unconstitutionality of such law unless the
application is heard and determined by a 3-judge court.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.
Any application for an interlocutory or permanent in-
junction restraining the enforcement, operation, or execu-
tion of a State law adopted by referendum shall not be
granted by a United States district court or judge thereof
upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such State
law unless the application for the injunction is heard and
determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with sec-
tion 2284 of title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of
a determination on such application shall be to the Su-
preme Court. In any case to which this section applies,
the additional judges who will serve on the 3-judge court
shall be designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28,
United States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court
shall expedite the consideration of the application for an
injunction.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act—
(1) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several
States and the District of Columbia;
(2) the term ‘‘State law’’ means the constitu-
tion of a State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regu-
lation, or other measure of a State that has the
force of law, and any amendment thereto; and
(3) the term ‘‘referendum’’ means the submis-
sion to popular vote of a measure passed upon or
proposed by a legislative body or by popular initia-
tive.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act applies to any application for an injunction
that is filed on or after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
Passed the House of Representatives September 28,
1995.
Attest:
Clerk.
II 
Calendar No. 509 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2291 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 15, 2014 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
JULY 31, 2014 
Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New 
York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. VINCENT R. SOMBROTTO POST OFFICE. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:04 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2291.RS
H2291
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto 
Post Office’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:04 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2291.RS
H2291
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:04 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2291.RS
H2291
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 509 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2291 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in 
New York, New York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. 
Sombrotto Post Office’’. 
JULY 31, 2014 
Reported without amendment 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:04 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H2291.RS
H2291
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
or other measure of a State that has the force of
law, and any amendment thereto; and
(3) the term ‘‘referendum’’ means the submis-
sion to popular vote of a measure passed upon or
proposed by a legislative body or by popular initia-
tive.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act applies to any action commenced on or after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
IIA
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1170
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
AN ACT
To provide that an application for an injunction restraining
the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law
adopted by referendum may not be granted on the
ground of the unconstitutionality of such law unless the
application is heard and determined by a 3-judge court.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 1170 RFS
SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.
Any application for an interlocutory or permanent in-
junction restraining the enforcement, operation, or execu-
tion of a State law adopted by referendum shall not be
granted by a United States district court or judge thereof
upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such State
law unless the application for the injunction is heard and
determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with sec-
tion 2284 of title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of
a determination on such application shall be to the Su-
preme Court. In any case to which this section applies,
the additional judges who will serve on the 3-judge court
shall be designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28,
United States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court
shall expedite the consideration of the application for an
injunction.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act—
(1) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several
States and the District of Columbia;
(2) the term ‘‘State law’’ means the constitu-
tion of a State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regu-
lation, or other measure of a State that has the
force of law, and any amendment thereto; and
(3) the term ‘‘referendum’’ means the submis-
sion to popular vote of a measure passed upon or
HR 1170 RFS
proposed by a legislative body or by popular initia-
tive.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act applies to any application for an injunction
that is filed on or after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
Passed the House of Representatives September 28,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 1296 
AN ACT 
To amend the San Luis Rey Indian Water Rights Settlement 
Act to clarify certain settlement terms, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
(d) ACTION
TO
ENJOIN
OR
RESTRAIN
VIOLA-
TIONS.—Section 6c(d) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 13a–1(d)) 
is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘a civil pen-
alty in the amount of’’ after ‘‘violation’’; and 
(2) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
paragraph (1) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(A) not more than the greater of— 
‘‘(i) ‘‘$1,000,000, in the case of a per-
son who is an individual, for each violation; 
‘‘(ii) $10,000,000, in the case of any 
person other than an individual, for each 
violation; 
‘‘(iii) triple the monetary gain to the 
person and all other persons acting in con-
cert with the person, for each such viola-
tion; or 
‘‘(iv) triple the total amount of losses 
by persons proximately caused by each 
such violation; or 
‘‘(B) triple the maximum amount other-
wise available under subparagraph (A) if the 
person, within 5 years preceding the violation, 
has been— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:02 Jun 09, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2292.IH
H2292
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(i) found in a proceeding brought by 
the Commission, or by agreement of settle-
ment to which the Commission is a party, 
to have recklessly or willfully violated any 
provision of this Act or of the rules, regu-
lations, or orders of the Commission there-
under; or 
‘‘(ii) convicted of any criminal offense 
that involves a violation of this Act or of 
the rules, regulations, or orders of the 
Commission thereunder.’’. 
(e) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Section 9(a) of such Act 
(7 U.S.C. 13(a)) is amended by inserting ‘‘in the case of 
an individual or $10,000,000 in the case of any person 
other than an individual, for each violation,’’ after 
‘‘$1,000,000’’. 
(f) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—Section 9 of such 
Act (7 U.S.C. 13) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(f) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—An action, suit or 
proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, 
or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, shall not be enter-
tained unless commenced within 10 years after the date 
when the claim first accrued if, within the same period, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:32 Jun 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2292.IH
H2292
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
the offender or the property is found within the United 
States in order that proper service may be made thereon.’’. 
SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATES. 
(a) REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE
TO HIGH FRE-
QUENCY TRADERS.—The amendment made by section 
2(a) shall take effect on the date that is 9 months after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(b) PENALTIES
PROVISIONS.—The amendments 
made by sections 3 and 4 shall take effect on the date 
that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:32 Jun 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2292.IH
H2292
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 91
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1170
[Report No. 104–179]
A BILL
To provide that cases challenging the constitu-
tionality of measures passed by State referendum
be heard by a 3-judge court.
JULY 11, 1995
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee
of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and or-
dered to be printed
IB
Union Calendar No. 91
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1170
[Report No. 104–179]
To provide that cases challenging the constitutionality of measures passed
by State referendum be heard by a 3-judge court.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 8, 1995
Mr. BONO (for himself, Mr. HYDE, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. SENSENBRENNER,
Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. COBLE, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. CANADY of Florida, Mr.
GOODLATTE, Mr. HOKE, Mr. COX of California, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr.
DREIER, Mr. PAXON, Mr. RIGGS, Mr. LEWIS
of California, Mr.
ROHRABACHER, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. SMITH
of Texas, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.
DORNAN, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. POMBO,
Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. KIM,
Mr. BUYER, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. BARR, Mr. HORN, Mr.
BRYANT of Tennessee, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. RADANOVICH,
and Mrs. SEASTRAND) introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary
JULY 11, 1995
Additional sponsors: Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mrs.
CHENOWETH, and Mr. DELAY
JULY 11, 1995
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House
on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 8, 1995]
‘‘(II) 
ELIGIBILITY.—Construc-
tion that is carried out after the exe-
cution of an agreement to carry out 
work described in subclause (I) and 
any design activities that are required 
for that construction, even if the de-
sign activity is carried out prior to the 
execution of the agreement to carry 
out work, shall be eligible for credit. 
‘‘(ii) PLANNING.— 
‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—In any case 
in which the non-Federal interest is to 
receive credit under subparagraph (A) 
for the cost of planning carried out by 
the non-Federal interest before execu-
tion of a feasibility cost sharing agree-
ment, the Secretary and the non-Fed-
eral interest shall enter into an agree-
ment under which the non-Federal in-
terest shall carry out such work prior 
to the non-Federal interest initiating 
that planning. 
‘‘(II) 
ELIGIBILITY.—Planning 
that is carried out by the non-Federal 
interest after the execution of an 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:32 Jun 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2293.IH
H2293
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
A BILL
To provide that cases challenging the constitutionality of
measures passed by State referendum be heard by a
3-judge court.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.
Any application for an interlocutory or permanent in-
junction restraining the enforcement, operation, or execu-
tion of a State law adopted by referendum shall not be
granted by a United States district court or judge thereof
upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such State
law unless the application for the injunction is heard and
determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with section
2284 of title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of a deter-
mination on such application shall be to the Supreme
Court. In any case to which this section applies, the addi-
tional judges who will serve on the 3-judge court shall be
designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28, United
States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court shall ex-
pedite the consideration of the application for an injunc-
tion.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act—
(1) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several
States and the District of Columbia;
(2) the term ‘‘State law’’ means the constitution
of a State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation,
or other measure of a State that has the force of law,
and any amendment thereto; and
(3) the term ‘‘referendum’’ means the submission
to popular vote of a measure passed upon or proposed
by a legislative body or by popular initiative.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act applies to any application for an injunction
that is filed on or after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to provide that
an application for an injunction restraining the enforce-
ment, operation, or execution of a State law adopted by
referendum may not be granted on the ground of the un-
constitutionality of such law unless the application is
heard and determined by a 3-judge court.’’.
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1171
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a shorter recovery
period for the depreciation of certain leasehold improvements.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 8, 1995
Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. CRANE, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecti-
cut, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. ENG-
LISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. HERGER)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
a shorter recovery period for the depreciation of certain
leasehold improvements.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RECOVERY PERIOD FOR DEPRECIATION OF
CERTAIN LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 168 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining applicable
recovery period) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
HR 1171 IH
‘‘(3) QUALIFIED
LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENT
PROPERTY.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of quali-
fied leasehold improvement property, the appli-
cable recovery period shall be 10 years.
‘‘(B) QUALIFIED
LEASEHOLD
IMPROVE-
MENT PROPERTY DEFINED.—For purposes of
this paragraph, the term ‘qualified leasehold
improvement property’ means any improvement
to an interior portion of a building which is
nonresidential real property if—
‘‘(i) such improvement is made under
or pursuant to a lease (as defined in para-
graph (7) of subsection 168 (h))—
‘‘(I) by the lessee (or any
sublessee) of such portion, or
‘‘(II) by the lessor of such por-
tion,
‘‘(ii) such portion is to be occupied ex-
clusively by the lessee (or any sublessee) of
such portion, and
‘‘(iii) such improvement is placed in
service more than 3 years after the date
the building was first placed in service.
HR 1171 IH
‘‘(C) CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS
NOT
IN-
CLUDED.—Such term shall not include any im-
provement for which the expenditure is attrib-
utable to—
‘‘(i) the enlargement of the building,
‘‘(ii) any elevator or escalator,
‘‘(iii) any structural component bene-
fiting a common area, and
‘‘(iv) the internal structural frame-
work of the building.
‘‘(D) DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.—
For purposes of this paragraph—
‘‘(i) COMMITMENT TO LEASE TREAT-
ED
AS
LEASE.—A commitment to enter
into a lease shall be treated as a lease, and
the parties to such commitment shall be
treated as lessor and lessee, respectively.
‘‘(ii) RELATED PERSONS.—A lease be-
tween related persons shall not be consid-
ered a lease. For purposes of this subpara-
graph, related persons means members of
an affiliated group (as defined in section
1504), or persons having a relationship de-
scribed in subsection (b) of section 267 ex-
cept that, for purposes of this clause, the
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4233
AN ACT
To provide for appropriate implementation of the
Metric Conversion Act of 1975 in Federal con-
struction projects, and for other purposes.
HR 1171 IH
phrase ‘80 percent or more’ shall be sub-
stituted for the phrase ‘more than 50 per-
cent’ each place it appears in such sub-
section.
‘‘(E) RECOVERY PERIOD ALSO USED FOR
MINIMUM TAX, ETC.—The recovery period de-
termined under this paragraph shall also apply
for purposes of subsection (g).’’
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) Subsection (b) of section 168 of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 (applying the straight
line method to certain property) is amended by add-
ing the following new subparagraph (F):
‘‘(F) 
Qualified 
leasehold 
improvement
property.’’
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall apply to qualified leasehold improvement
property placed in service after the date of the enactment
of this Act.
Æ