H. R. 2647—270 
departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
an annual report on the electronic warfare strategy of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
(b) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—Each report required under sub-
section (a) shall include each of the following: 
(1) A description and overview of— 
(A) the electronic warfare strategy of the Department 
of Defense; 
(B) how such strategy supports the National Defense 
Strategy; and 
(C) the organizational structure assigned to oversee 
the development of the Department’s electronic warfare 
strategy, 
requirements, 
capabilities, 
programs, 
and 
projects. 
(2) A list of all the electronic warfare acquisition programs 
and research and development projects of the Department of 
Defense and a description of how each program or project 
supports the Department’s electronic warfare strategy. 
(3) For each unclassified program or project on the list 
required by paragraph (2)— 
(A) the senior acquisition executive and organization 
responsible for oversight of the program or project; 
(B) whether or not validated requirements exist for 
the program or project and, if such requirements do exist, 
the date on which the requirements were validated and 
the organizational authority that validated such require-
ments; 
(C) the total amount of funding appropriated, obligated, 
and forecasted by fiscal year for the program or project, 
including the program element or procurement line number 
from which the program or project receives funding; 
(D) the development or procurement schedule for the 
program or project; 
(E) an assessment of the cost, schedule, and perform-
ance of the program or project as it relates to the program 
baseline for the program or project, as of the date of the 
submission of the report, and the original program baseline 
for such program or project, if such baselines are not the 
same; 
(F) the technology readiness level of each critical tech-
nology that is part of the program or project; 
(G) whether or not the program or project is redundant 
or overlaps with the efforts of another military department; 
and 
(H) the capability gap that the program or project 
is being developed or procured to fulfill. 
(4) A classified annex that contains the items described 
in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (3) for each 
classified program or project on the list required by paragraph 
(2). 
SEC. 1054. STUDY ON A SYSTEM FOR CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND 
MANAGEMENT OF INTERAGENCY NATIONAL SECURITY 
PROFESSIONALS. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—
H. R. 2647—271 
(1) DESIGNATION OF EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—Not later than 
30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Presi-
dent shall designate an Executive agency to commission a study 
of the matters described in subsection (b) by an appropriate 
independent, nonprofit organization. The designated Executive 
agency shall select the organization and commission the study 
not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act. 
(2) QUALIFICATIONS
OF
ORGANIZATION
SELECTED.—The 
organization selected shall be qualified on the basis of having 
performed related work in the fields of national security and 
human capital development, and on the basis of such other 
criteria as the head of the designated Executive agency may 
determine. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE EXAMINED.—The study required by sub-
section (a) shall examine matters pertaining to a system for the 
development and management of interagency national security 
professionals including, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT.—The skills, education, 
training, and professional experiences desired in interagency 
national security professionals at various career stages, as well 
as the feasibility, benefits, and costs of developing a pool of 
personnel necessary to enable interagency national security 
professionals to undertake such professional development 
opportunities. 
(2) COORDINATION.—Procedures for ensuring appropriate 
consistency and coordination among participating Executive 
agencies, such as methods for identifying positions and per-
sonnel that should be included in the system, and coordination 
of treatment in personnel and human resource systems, 
including performance review and promotion policies. 
(3) FUNDING.—Potential mechanisms for funding an inter-
agency national security professional development program. 
(4) MILITARY
AND
STATE
AND
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
PER-
SONNEL.—The feasibility of integrating, coordinating, or 
supplementing the systems and requirements regarding experi-
ence and education for military officers with an interagency 
national security professional system, as well as potential 
means of, and benefits and drawbacks of, including State and 
local government organizations and personnel in the system. 
(5) INCENTIVES TO PARTICIPATE.—Incentives and require-
ments that could be implemented to encourage personnel and 
organizations to fully participate in the system across various 
career levels. 
(6) CURRENT EFFORTS.—The effectiveness of, and lessons 
learned from, major current efforts at developing interagency 
national security professionals. 
(c) REPORT.—A report containing the findings and recommenda-
tions resulting from the study required by subsection (a), together 
with any views or recommendations of the President, shall be 
submitted to Congress not later than December 1, 2010. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the meaning given 
such term by section 105 of title 5, United States Code. 
(2) The term ‘‘employee’’ has the meaning given such term 
by section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.
H. R. 2647—272 
(3) The term ‘‘interagency national security professional’’ 
means an employee of an Executive agency who plans, coordi-
nates, or participates in activities relating to the national secu-
rity of the United States that require significant interaction 
and engagement with other Executive agencies. 
SEC. 1055. REPORT ON NUCLEAR ASPIRATIONS OF NON-STATE ENTI-
TIES, NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND RELATED PROGRAMS IN 
NON-NUCLEAR-WEAPONS STATES AND COUNTRIES NOT 
PARTIES 
TO 
THE 
NUCLEAR 
NON-PROLIFERATION 
TREATY, AND CERTAIN FOREIGN PERSONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of National Intelligence shall 
biennially submit to the congressional defense committees, the 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives 
a report— 
(1) on the nuclear weapons programs and any related pro-
grams of countries that are non-nuclear-weapons state parties 
to the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done 
at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered 
into force March 5, 1970 (commonly known as the ‘‘Nuclear 
Non-Proliferation Treaty’’) and countries that are not parties 
to the Treaty; 
(2) on the nuclear weapons aspirations of such non-state 
entities as the Director considers appropriate to include in 
the report; and 
(3) that identifies each foreign person that, during the 
period covered by the report, made a material contribution 
to the research, development, production, or acquisition by a 
country of proliferation concern of— 
(A) weapons of mass destruction (including nuclear 
weapons, chemical weapons, or biological weapons); or 
(B) ballistic or cruise missile systems. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include, with respect to each country described in subsection (a)(1) 
and each non-state entity referred to in subsection (a)(2), the fol-
lowing: 
(1) A statement of the number of nuclear weapons pos-
sessed by such country or non-state entity. 
(2) An estimate of the total number of nuclear weapons 
that such country or non-state entity seeks to obtain and, 
in the case of such non-state entity, an assessment of the 
extent to which such non-state entity is seeking to develop 
a nuclear weapon or device or radiological dispersion device. 
(3) A description of the technical characteristics of any 
nuclear weapons possessed by such country or non-state entity. 
(4) A description of nuclear weapons designs available to 
such country or non-state entity. 
(5) A description of any sources of assistance with respect 
to nuclear weapons design provided to or by such country 
or non-state entity and, in the case of assistance provided 
by such country or non-state entity, a description of to whom 
such assistance was provided. 
(6) An assessment of the annual capability of such country 
and non-state entity to produce new or newly designed nuclear 
weapons.
H. R. 2647—273 
(7) A description of the type of fissile materials used in 
any nuclear weapons possessed by such country or non-state 
entity. 
(8) An description of the location and production capability 
of any fissile materials production facilities in such country 
or controlled by such non-state entity, the current status of 
any such facilities, and any plans by such country or non- 
state entity to develop such facilities. 
(9) An identification of the source of any fissile materials 
used by such country or non-state entity, if such materials 
are not produced in facilities referred to in paragraph (8). 
(10) An assessment of the intentions of such country or 
non-state entity to leverage civilian nuclear capabilities for 
a nuclear weapons program. 
(11) A description of any delivery systems available to 
such country or non-state entity and an assessment of whether 
nuclear warheads have been mated, or there are plans for 
such warheads to be mated, to any such delivery system. 
(12) An assessment of the physical security of the storage 
facilities for nuclear weapons in such country or controlled 
by such non-state entity. 
(13) An assessment of whether such country is modernizing 
or otherwise improving the safety, security, and reliability of 
the nuclear weapons stockpile of such country. 
(14) An assessment of the industrial capability and capacity 
of such country or non-state entity to produce nuclear weapons. 
(15) In the case of a country, an assessment of the policy 
of such country on the employment and use of nuclear weapons. 
(c) REFERENCES TO OTHER REPORTS.—Each report submitted 
under subsection (a) shall include a copy of any other report that 
is incorporated by reference into the report submitted under sub-
section (a). 
(d) UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY.—Each report submitted under sub-
section (a) shall include an unclassified summary of such report. 
(e) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives the first report required 
under subsection (a) by not later than September 1, 2010. 
(2) NOTIFICATION OF DELAY IN SUBMITTAL.—If the Director 
of National Intelligence determines that it will not be possible 
for the Director to submit the first report required under sub-
section (a) by September 1, 2010, the Director shall, not later 
than August 1, 2010, submit to the committees specified in 
paragraph (1) a notice— 
(A) that such report will not be submitted by Sep-
tember 1, 2010; and 
(B) setting forth the date by which the Director will 
submit such report. 
(f) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 722 of the Combating 
Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 
2369) is repealed. 
(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) FOREIGN PERSON.—The term ‘‘foreign person’’ means 
any of the following:
H. R. 2647—274 
(A) A natural person who is not a citizen of the United 
States. 
(B) A corporation, business association, partnership, 
society, trust, or other nongovernmental entity, organiza-
tion, or group that is organized under the laws of a foreign 
country or has its principal place of business in a foreign 
country. 
(C) Any foreign government or foreign governmental 
entity operating as a business enterprise or in any other 
capacity. 
(D) Any successor, subunit, or subsidiary of any entity 
described in subparagraph (B) or (C). 
(2) COUNTRY
OF
PROLIFERATION
CONCERN.—The term 
‘‘country of proliferation concern’’ means any country identified 
by the Director of Central Intelligence as having engaged in 
the acquisition of dual-use and other technology useful for 
the development or production of weapons of mass destruction 
(including nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, and biological 
weapons) or advanced conventional munitions— 
(A) in the most recent report under section 721 of 
the Combating Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruc-
tion Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 2366); or 
(B) in any successor report on the acquisition by foreign 
countries of dual-use and other technology useful for the 
development or production of weapons of mass destruction. 
SEC. 1056. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE SPENDING IN FINAL FISCAL QUARTERS. 
(a) REVIEW OF SPENDING BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL.— 
The Comptroller General shall conduct a review of obligations 
incurred by the Department of Defense in the final quarter each 
covered fiscal year, as compared to the obligations so incurred 
in the first three quarters of that fiscal year, to determine if 
policies with respect to financial execution by the Department con-
tribute to hastened year-end spending and poor use or waste of 
taxpayer dollars. Such review shall include both one-year and multi- 
year appropriations for each covered fiscal year. 
(b) COVERED FISCAL YEARS.—For purposes of this section, a 
covered fiscal year is fiscal year 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2010, the Comptroller 
General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 
the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing— 
(1) the results of the review conducted under subsection 
(a); and 
(2) any recommendations of the Comptroller General with 
respect to improving the policies pursuant to which amounts 
appropriated to the Department of Defense are obligated and 
expended in the final quarter of a fiscal year. 
SEC. 1057. REPORT ON AIR AMERICA. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) AIR
AMERICA.—The term ‘‘Air America’’ means Air 
America, Incorporated. 
(2) ASSOCIATED COMPANY.—The term ‘‘associated company’’ 
means any entity associated with, predecessor to, or subsidiary 
to Air America, including Air Asia Company Limited, CAT 
Incorporated, Civil Air Transport Company Limited, and the 
Pacific Division of Southern Air Transport, during the period
H. R. 2647—275 
when such an entity was owned and controlled by the United 
States Government. 
(b) REPORT ON RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR FORMER EMPLOYEES 
OF AIR AMERICA.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intel-
ligence shall submit to Congress a report on the advisability 
of providing Federal retirement benefits to United States citi-
zens for the service of such citizens prior to 1977 as employees 
of Air America or an associated company during a period when 
Air America or the associated company was owned or controlled 
by the United States Government and operated or managed 
by the Central Intelligence Agency. 
(2) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph 
(1) shall include the following: 
(A) The history of Air America and the associated 
companies prior to 1977, including a description of— 
(i) the relationship between Air America and the 
associated companies and the Central Intelligence 
Agency or any other element of the United States 
Government; 
(ii) the workforce of Air America and the associated 
companies; 
(iii) the missions performed by Air America, the 
associated companies, and their employees for the 
United States; and 
(iv) the casualties suffered by employees of Air 
America and the associated companies in the course 
of their employment. 
(B) A description of— 
(i) the retirement benefits contracted for or prom-
ised to the employees of Air America and the associated 
companies prior to 1977; 
(ii) the contributions made by such employees for 
such benefits; 
(iii) the retirement benefits actually paid such 
employees; 
(iv) the entitlement of such employees to the pay-
ment of future retirement benefits; and 
(v) the likelihood that such employees will receive 
any future retirement benefits. 
(C) An assessment of the difference between— 
(i) the retirement benefits that former employees 
of Air America and the associated companies have 
received or will receive by virtue of their employment 
with Air America and the associated companies; and 
(ii) the retirement benefits that such employees 
would have received or be eligible to receive if such 
employment was deemed to be employment by the 
United States Government and their service during 
such employment was credited as Federal service for 
the purpose of Federal retirement benefits. 
(D)(i) Any recommendations regarding the advisability 
of legislative action to treat such employment as Federal 
service for the purpose of Federal retirement benefits in 
light of the relationship between Air America and the asso-
ciated companies and the United States Government and
H. R. 2647—276 
the services and sacrifices of such employees to and for 
the United States. 
(ii) If legislative action is considered advisable under 
clause (i), a proposal for such action and an assessment 
of its costs. 
(E) The opinions of the Director of the Central Intel-
ligence Agency, if any, on any matters covered by the 
report that the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency 
considers appropriate. 
(3) ASSISTANCE
OF
COMPTROLLER
GENERAL.—The Comp-
troller General of the United States shall, upon the request 
of the Director of National Intelligence and in a manner con-
sistent with the protection of classified information, assist the 
Director in the preparation of the report required by paragraph 
(1). 
(4) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
annex. 
SEC. 1058. REPORT ON DEFENSE TRAVEL SIMPLIFICATION. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 
of Representatives a report setting forth a comprehensive plan 
to simplify Department of Defense travel procedures. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A comprehensive discussion of aspects of the Depart-
ment of Defense travel procedures that are most confusing, 
inefficient, and in need of revision. 
(2) A critical review of opportunities to streamline and 
simplify defense travel policies and to reduce travel-related 
costs to the Department of Defense. 
(3) A discussion of any actions to incorporate permanent 
duty travel that are being undertaken by the Secretary of 
Defense as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(4) A plan to gather data on the number of manual tem-
porary duty vouchers processed by the Department of Defense. 
(5) Options to leverage industry capabilities and tech-
nologies that could enhance management responsiveness to 
changing markets. 
(6) A discussion of pilot programs that the Secretary of 
Defense could carry out to demonstrate the merit of improve-
ments identified pursuant to preparing the report required 
by this section, including a discussion of— 
(A) recommendations for legislative authority; and 
(B) how the systems developed for purposes of such 
a pilot program would interact with the automated Defense 
Travel System in effect as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(7) Such recommendations and an implementation plan 
for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary of 
Defense considers appropriate to improve defense travel. 
SEC. 1059. REPORT ON MODELING AND SIMULATION TECHNOLOGICAL 
AND INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, working
H. R. 2647—277 
through the Director for Defense Research and Engineering, the 
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy, the Com-
mander of the United States Joint Forces Command, and other 
appropriate organizations, shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report that describes current and planned efforts 
to support and enhance the defense modeling and simulation techno-
logical and industrial base, including in academia, industry, and 
government. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) An assessment of the current and future domestic 
defense modeling and simulation technological and industrial 
base and its ability to meet current and future defense require-
ments. 
(2) A description of current and planned programs and 
activities of the Department of Defense to enhance the ability 
of the domestic defense modeling and simulation technological 
and industrial base to meet current and future defense require-
ments. 
(3) A description of current and planned Department of 
Defense activities in cooperation with Federal, State, and local 
government organizations that promote the enhancement of 
the ability of the domestic defense modeling and simulation 
technological and industrial base to meet current and future 
defense requirements. 
(4) A comparative assessment of current and future global 
modeling and simulation capabilities relative to those of the 
United States in areas related to defense applications of mod-
eling and simulation. 
(5) An identification of additional authorities or resources 
related to technology transfer, establishment of public-private 
partnerships, coordination with regional, State, or local initia-
tives, or other activities that would be required to enhance 
efforts to support the domestic defense modeling and simulation 
technological and industrial base. 
(6) Other matters as determined appropriate by the Sec-
retary. 
SEC. 1060. REPORT ON ENABLING CAPABILITIES FOR SPECIAL OPER-
ATIONS FORCES. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of the United States 
Special Operations Command, jointly with the commanders of the 
combatant commands and the Chief of Staff of the Army, the 
Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, 
and the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall submit to the 
Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
Staff a report on the availability of enabling capabilities to support 
special operations forces requirements. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under 
subsection (a) shall include the following: 
(1) An identification of the requirements for enabling 
capabilities for conventional forces and special operations forces 
globally, including current and projected needs in Iraq, Afghani-
stan, and other theaters of operation.
H. R. 2647—278 
(2) A description of the processes used to prioritize and 
allocate enabling capabilities to meet the mission requirements 
of conventional forces and special operations forces. 
(3) An identification and description of any shortfalls in 
enabling capabilities for special operations forces by function, 
region, and quantity, as determined by the Commander of 
the United States Special Operations Command and the com-
manders of the geographic combatant commands. 
(4) An assessment of the current inventory of these 
enabling capabilities within the military departments and 
components and the United States Special Operations Com-
mand. 
(5) An assessment of whether there is a need to create 
additional enabling capabilities by function and quantity. 
(6) An assessment of the merits of creating additional 
enabling units, by type and quantity— 
(A) within the military departments; and 
(B) within the United States Special Operations Com-
mand. 
(7) Recommendations for meeting the current and future 
enabling force requirements of the United States Special Oper-
ations Command, including an assessment of the increases 
in endstrength, equipment, funding, and military construction 
that would be required to support these recommendations. 
(8) Any other matters the Commander of the United States 
Special Operations Command, the commanders of the combat-
ant commands, and the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief 
of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and 
the Commandant of the Marine Corps consider useful and 
relevant. 
(c) REPORT
TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after 
receiving the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary 
of Defense shall forward the report to the congressional defense 
committees with any additional comments the Secretary considers 
appropriate. 
SEC. 1061. ADDITIONAL MEMBERS AND DUTIES FOR THE INDE-
PENDENT 
PANEL 
TO 
ASSESS 
THE 
QUADRENNIAL 
DEFENSE REVIEW. 
(a) ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of conducting the assess-
ment of the 2009 quadrennial defense review under section 
118 of title 10, United States Code (in this section referred 
to as the ‘‘2009 QDR’’), the independent panel established under 
subsection (f) of such section (in this section referred to as 
the ‘‘Panel’’) shall include eight additional members as follows: 
(A) Two appointed by the chairman of the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 
(B) Two appointed by the chairman of the Committee 
on Armed Services of the Senate. 
(C) Two appointed by the ranking member of the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 
(D) Two appointed by the ranking member of the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the Senate. 
(2) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES.—Members of the 
Panel appointed under paragraph (1) shall be appointed for 
the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in an appointment to the
H. R. 2647—279 
Panel under paragraph (1) shall be filled in the same manner 
as the original appointment. 
(b) ADDITIONAL DUTIES.—In addition to the duties of the Panel 
under section 118(f) of title 10, United States Code, the Panel 
shall, with respect to the 2009 QDR— 
(1) review the Secretary of Defense’s terms of reference, 
and any other materials providing the basis for, or substantial 
inputs to, the work of the Department of Defense on the 2009 
QDR; 
(2) conduct an assessment of the assumptions, strategy, 
findings, and risks in the report of the Secretary of Defense 
on the 2009 QDR, with particular attention paid to the risks 
described in that report; 
(3) conduct an independent assessment of a variety of pos-
sible force structures for the Armed Forces, including the force 
structure identified in the report of the Secretary of Defense 
on the 2009 QDR; and 
(4) review the resource requirements identified in the 2009 
QDR pursuant to section 118(b)(3) of title 10, United States 
Code, and, to the extent practicable, make a general comparison 
of such resource requirements with the resource requirements 
to support the forces contemplated under the force structures 
assessed under paragraph (3). 
(c) REPORTS.— 
(1) INITIAL
REPORT
OF
PANEL.—The report on the 2009 
QDR that is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 118(f)(2) 
of title 10, United States Code, shall include, in addition to 
any other matters required by such section, the interim findings 
of the Panel with respect to the matters specified in subsection 
(b). 
(2) FINAL REPORT OF PANEL.—Not later than July 15, 2010, 
the Panel shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, and to 
the congressional defense committees, the final report of the 
Panel on the matters specified in subsection (b). The report 
shall include such recommendations on such matters as the 
Panel considers appropriate. 
(3) REPORT OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Not later than 
August 15, 2010, the Secretary of Defense shall, after consulta-
tion with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth 
the Secretary’s response to the final report of the Panel under 
paragraph (2). 
(d) TERMINATION
OF PANEL.—The Panel shall terminate 45 
days after the date on which the Panel submits its final report 
under subsection (c)(2). 
SEC. 1062. CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS RELATING TO THE DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) REPORT ON RECURRING EARMARKS.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
regarding covered earmarks. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
include the following: 
(A) An identification of each covered earmark that 
has been included in a national defense authorization Act
H. R. 2647—280 
for three or more consecutive fiscal years as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
(B) A description of the extent to which competitive 
or merit-based procedures were used to award funding, 
or to enter into a contract, grant, or other agreement, 
pursuant to each covered earmark. 
(C) An identification of the specific contracting vehicle 
used for each covered earmark. 
(D) In the case of any covered earmark for which 
competitive or merit-based procedures were not used to 
award funding, or to enter into the contract, grant, or 
other agreement, a statement of the reasons competitive 
or merit-based procedures were not used. 
(b) DOD INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF CONGRESSIONAL EAR-
MARKS.—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall 
conduct an audit of contracts, grants, or other agreements pursuant 
to congressional earmarks of Department of Defense funds to deter-
mine whether or not the recipients of such earmarks are complying 
with requirements of Federal law on the use of appropriated funds 
to influence, whether directly or indirectly, congressional action 
on any legislation or appropriation matter pending before Congress. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘congressional earmark’’ means any congres-
sionally directed spending item (Senate) or congressional ear-
mark (House of Representatives) on a list published in compli-
ance with rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate 
or rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. 
(2) The term ‘‘covered earmark’’ means any congressional 
earmark identified in the joint explanatory statement to accom-
pany the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417) that was printed 
in the Congressional Record on September 23, 2008. 
(3) The term ‘‘national defense authorization Act’’ means 
an Act authorizing funds for a fiscal year for the military 
activities of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes. 
SEC. 1063. REPORT ON BASING PLANS FOR CERTAIN UNITED STATES 
GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT COMMANDS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Concurrent with the delivery of 
the report on the 2009 quadrennial defense review required by 
section 118 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
the plan for basing of forces outside the United States. 
(b) MATTERS COVERED.—The report required under subsection 
(a) shall contain a description of— 
(1) how the plan supports the United States national secu-
rity strategy; 
(2) how the plan supports the security commitments under-
taken by the United States pursuant to any international secu-
rity treaty, including the North Atlantic Treaty, the Treaty 
of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States 
and Japan, and the Security Treaty Between Australia, New 
Zealand, and the United States of America; 
(3) how the plan addresses the current security environ-
ment in each geographic combatant command’s area of responsi-
bility, including United States participation in theater security
H. R. 2647—281 
cooperation activities and bilateral partnership, exchanges, and 
training exercises; 
(4) the impact that a permanent change in the basing 
of a unit currently stationed outside the United States would 
have on the matters described in paragraphs (1) through (3); 
(5) the impact the plan will have on the status of overseas 
base closure and realignment actions undertaken as part of 
a global defense posture realignment strategy and the status 
of development and execution of comprehensive master plans 
for overseas military main operating bases, forward operating 
sites, and cooperative security locations of the global defense 
posture of the United States; 
(6) any recommendations for additional closures or realign-
ments of military installations outside of the United States; 
and 
(7) any comments resulting from an interagency review 
of the plan that includes the Department of State and other 
relevant Federal departments and agencies. 
(c) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall notify Congress at least 30 days before the permanent reloca-
tion of a unit stationed outside the United States as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) UNIT.—The term ‘‘unit’’ has the meaning determined 
by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of this section. 
(2) GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT COMMAND.—For purposes of 
this section, the term ‘‘geographic combatant command’’ means 
a combatant command with a geographic area of responsibility 
that does not include North America. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 
1071. 
EXTENSION 
OF 
CERTAIN 
AUTHORITY 
FOR 
MAKING 
REWARDS FOR COMBATING TERRORISM. 
Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 
SEC. 1072. BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING. 
(a) NEW PROGRAMS.—Section 2222 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as para-
graphs (2) and (3), respectively; 
(B) by inserting before paragraph (2), as redesignated 
by subparagraph (A) of this subsection, the following new 
paragraph (1): 
‘‘(1) the appropriate chief management officer for the 
defense business system modernization has determined whether 
or not— 
‘‘(A) the defense business system modernization is in 
compliance with the enterprise architecture developed 
under subsection (c); and 
‘‘(B) appropriate business process reengineering efforts 
have been undertaken to ensure that—
H. R. 2647—282 
‘‘(i) the business process to be supported by the 
defense business system modernization will be as 
streamlined and efficient as practicable; and 
‘‘(ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf sys-
tems to meet unique requirements or incorporate 
unique interfaces has been eliminated or reduced to 
the maximum extent practicable;’’; 
(C) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by subparagraph 
(A) of this subsection, by striking subparagraph (A) and 
inserting the following new subparagraph (A): 
‘‘(A) has been determined by the appropriate chief 
management officer to be in compliance with the require-
ments of paragraph (1);’’; and 
(D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subparagraph 
(A) of this paragraph, by striking ‘‘the certification by the 
approval authority is’’ and inserting ‘‘the certification by 
the approval authority and the determination by the chief 
management officer are’’; and 
(2) in subsection (f)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as 
subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (E) of paragraph (1), as designated 
by this paragraph, by striking ‘‘paragraphs (1) through 
(4)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (A) through (D)’’; and 
(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph 
(2): 
‘‘(2) For purposes of subsection (a), the appropriate chief 
management officer for a defense business system modernization 
is as follows: 
‘‘(A) In the case of an Army program, the Chief Manage-
ment Officer of the Army. 
‘‘(B) In the case of a Navy program, the Chief Management 
Officer of the Navy. 
‘‘(C) In the case of an Air Force program, the Chief Manage-
ment Officer of the Air Force. 
‘‘(D) In the case of a program of a Defense Agency, the 
Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of 
Defense. 
‘‘(E) In the case of a program that will support the business 
processes of more than one military department or Defense 
Agency, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense.’’. 
(b) ONGOING PROGRAMS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the appropriate chief management 
officer for each defense business system modernization 
approved by the Defense Business Systems Management Com-
mittee before the date of the enactment of this Act that will 
have a total cost in excess of $100,000,000 shall review such 
defense business system modernization to determine whether 
or not appropriate business process reengineering efforts have 
been undertaken to ensure that— 
(A) the business process to be supported by such 
defense business system modernization will be as stream-
lined and efficient as practicable; and
H. R. 2647—283 
(B) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems 
to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique inter-
faces has been eliminated or reduced to the maximum 
extent practicable. 
(2) ACTION
ON
FINDING
OF
LACK
OF
REENGINEERING 
EFFORTS.—If the appropriate chief management officer deter-
mines that appropriate business process reengineering efforts 
have not been undertaken with regard to a defense business 
system modernization as described in paragraph (1), that chief 
management officer— 
(A) shall develop a plan to undertake business process 
reengineering efforts with respect to the defense business 
system modernization; and 
(B) may direct that the defense business system mod-
ernization be restructured or terminated, if necessary to 
meet the requirements of paragraph (1). 
(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
(A) The term ‘‘appropriate chief management officer’’, 
with respect to a defense business system modernization, 
has the meaning given that term in paragraph (2) of sub-
section (f) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code 
(as amended by subsection (a)(2) of this section). 
(B) The term ‘‘defense business system modernization’’ 
has the meaning given that term in subsection (j)(3) of 
section 2222 of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 1073. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 
(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States 
Code, is amended as follows: 
(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A 
is amended— 
(A) in the item relating to chapter 81, by striking 
‘‘1581’’ and inserting ‘‘1580’’; and 
(B) in the item relating to chapter 152, by striking 
‘‘2541’’ and inserting ‘‘2551’’. 
(2) Section 118(g) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of 
the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008’’ in paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting 
‘‘January 28, 2008,’’. 
(3) Section 184(b)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of 
the enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘October 17, 2006’’. 
(4) Section 438 at the end of subchapter I of chapter 21 
is redesignated as section 428. 
(5) The item relating to section 438 in the table of sections 
at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 21 is redesignated 
as section 428. 
(6) Section 490(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘180 days 
after date of the enactment of this section, and every even- 
numbered year thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘July 28 of every 
even-numbered year’’. 
(7) The table of chapters at the beginning of part II of 
subtitle A is amended by striking ‘‘1581’’ in the item relating 
to chapter 81 and inserting ‘‘1580’’. 
(8) Section 992(b)(4) is amended by striking the period 
after ‘‘under this section’’. 
(9) Section 1074f(f)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘continency’’ 
and inserting ‘‘contingency’’.
H. R. 2647—284 
(10) Section 1074g(f) is amended by striking ‘‘on or after 
the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘after January 28, 
2008’’. 
(11) The section heading for section 1076d is amended 
by striking ‘‘standard’’ and inserting ‘‘Standard’’. 
(12) Section 1079(f)(2)(B) is amended by striking the period 
after ‘‘year’’. 
(13) Section 1142(b) is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (4)(C), by striking ‘‘the Troops-to- 
Teachers Program Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 9301 et seq.)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the Troops-to-Teachers Program under sec-
tion 2302 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6672)’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (15), by striking ‘‘federal’’ both places 
it appears and inserting ‘‘Federal’’. 
(14) Section 1175a(h)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘qualities’’ 
and inserting ‘‘qualifies’’. 
(15) Section 1408(h)(2) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at 
the end of subparagraph (A). 
(16) The heading of section 1567 is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘§ 1567. Duration of military protective orders’’. 
(17) The heading of section 1567a is amended to read 
as follows: 
‘‘§ 1567a. Mandatory notification of issuance of military 
protective order to civilian law enforcement’’. 
(18) Section 2004a is amended— 
(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘pay grade 0-3’’ 
and inserting ‘‘pay grade O-3’’; and 
(B) in subsection (i), by adding a period at the end. 
(19) Section 2127(e) is amended by striking ‘‘of’’ after ‘‘an 
annual grant’’. 
(20) Section 2200a(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 
(21) The table of chapters at the beginning of part IV 
of subtitle A is amended by striking ‘‘2541’’ in the item relating 
to chapter 152 and inserting ‘‘2551’’. 
(22) Section 2306c(h) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
2801(c)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2801(c)(4)’’. 
(23) Section 2333 is amended— 
(A) in subsection (d)(1)(D)(ii), by striking ‘‘indefinite 
delivery indefinite quantity’’ and inserting ‘‘indefinite 
delivery-indefinite quantity’’; 
(B) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 
2388)’’; and 
(C) in subsection (f)(3), by striking ‘‘section 101(13)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘section 101(a)(13)’’. 
(24) Section 2401(f)(2) is amended by striking ‘‘the date 
of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘January 6, 2006’’.
H. R. 2647—285 
(25) Section 2461(c)(3)(A) is amended by striking ‘‘public 
private competition’’ both places it appears in the first sentence 
and inserting ‘‘public-private competition’’. 
(26) Section 2667(g)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘law,’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘may’’ and inserting ‘‘law, the Secretary 
concerned may’’. 
(27) Section 2684a(g)(2) is amended by striking ‘‘the fol-
lowing the following’’ and inserting ‘‘the following’’. 
(28) Section 2701(d)(5) is amended by striking ‘‘6920)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘9620)’’. 
(29) Sections 4348(f), 6959(f), and 9348(f) are amended 
by striking ‘‘section (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’. 
(30) The item relating to section 7317 in the table of 
sections at the beginning of chapter 633 is amended by inserting 
a period after ‘‘thereof’’. 
(31) Section 7306b(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘1802(14))’’ 
and inserting ‘‘1802(14)))’’. 
(32) The item relating to section 9515 in the table of 
sections at the beginning of chapter 941 is transferred to appear 
after the item relating to section 9514 in the table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 931. 
(33) The item relating to chapter 1409 in the table of 
chapters at the beginning of subtitle E is amended by striking 
‘‘Reserve-Active Status List’’ and inserting ‘‘Reserve Active- 
Status List’’. 
(34) Section 12310(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
12304(i)(2) of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1403 of the 
Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 
(50 U.S.C. 2302(1))’’. 
(35) Section 12731(f)(2)(A) is amended by striking ‘‘the 
date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘January 28, 2008’’. 
(36) Section 16163(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘programs’’ 
and inserting ‘‘program’’. 
(b) TITLE 37, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 308(a)(2)(A)(ii) 
of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking the comma 
before the period at the end. 
(c) DUNCAN HUNTER NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Effective as of October 14, 2008, and 
as if included therein as enacted, the Duncan Hunter National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 
417) is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 314(a) (122 Stat. 4410; 10 U.S.C. 2710 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary 
of Defense’’. 
(2) Section 523(1) (122 Stat. 4446) is amended by striking 
‘‘serving or’’ and inserting ‘‘serving in or’’. 
(3) Section 616 (122 Stat. 4486) is amended by striking 
‘‘of title’’ in subsections (b) and (c) and inserting ‘‘of such title’’. 
(4) Section 811(c)(6)(A)(iv)(I) (122 Stat. 4524) is amended 
by striking ‘‘after of ‘the program’ ’’ and inserting ‘‘after ‘of 
the program’ ’’. 
(5) Section 813(d)(3) (122 Stat. 4527) is amended by striking 
‘‘each of subsections (c)(2)(A) and (d)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub-
section (c)(2)(A)’’. 
(6) Section 834(a)(2) (122 Stat. 4537) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘subchapter II of’’ before ‘‘chapter 87’’.
H. R. 2647—286 
(7) Section 855 (122 Stat. 4545) is repealed. 
(8) Section 921(1) (122 Stat. 4573) is amended by striking 
‘‘subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h)’’ and inserting 
‘‘subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i)’’. 
(9) Section 931(b)(5) (122 Stat. 4575) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Section 201(e)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘Sec-
tion 201(f)(2)(E)’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘(6 U.S.C. 121(e)(2))’’ and inserting ‘‘(6 
U.S.C. 121(f)(2)(E))’’. 
(10) Section 932 (122 Stat. 4576) is repealed. 
(11) Section 1059 (122 Stat. 4611) is amended by striking 
‘‘Act of’’ and inserting ‘‘Act for’’. 
(12) Section 1061(b)(3) (122 Stat. 4613) is amended by 
striking ‘‘103’’ and inserting ‘‘188’’. 
(13) Section 2104(b) (122 Stat. 4664) is amended in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘section 2401’’ and 
inserting ‘‘section 2101’’. 
(14) Section 3508(b) (122 Stat. 4769) is amended to read 
as follows: 
‘‘(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The chapter 541 of title 46, 
United States Code, as inserted and amended by the amendments 
made by subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 3523(a)(6) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 599), is repealed.’’. 
(15) Section 3511(d) (122 Stat. 4770) is amended by 
inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, and by striking 
‘CALENDAR’ and inserting ‘FISCAL’ in the heading for paragraph 
(2)’’. 
(d) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2008.—Section 1107(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘Not later than’’ and all that follows through 
‘‘subsection is submitted,’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than November 
29, 2008, and not later than March 1 of each year thereafter,’’. 
SEC. 1074. EXTENSION OF SUNSET FOR CONGRESSIONAL COMMISSION 
ON THE STRATEGIC POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES. 
Section 1062(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 319) is amended 
by striking ‘‘September 30, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 
2009’’. 
SEC. 1075. COMBAT AIR FORCES RESTRUCTURING. 
(a) LIMITATIONS RELATING
TO LEGACY AIRCRAFT.—Until the 
expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date the Secretary 
of the Air Force submits a report in accordance with subsection 
(b), the following provisions apply: 
(1) PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT OF AIRCRAFT.—The Sec-
retary of the Air Force may not retire any fighter aircraft 
pursuant to the Combat Air Forces restructuring plan 
announced by the Secretary on May 18, 2009. 
(2) PROHIBITION ON PERSONNEL REASSIGNMENTS.—The Sec-
retary of the Air Force may not reassign any Air Force per-
sonnel (whether on active duty or a member of a reserve compo-
nent, including the National Guard) associated with such 
restructuring plan.
H. R. 2647—287 
(b) REPORT.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representa-
tives and the Senate and shall include the following information: 
(1) A detailed plan of how the force structure and capability 
gaps resulting from the retirement actions will be addressed. 
(2) An explanation of the assessment conducted of the 
current threat environment and current capabilities. 
(3) A description of the follow-on mission assignments for 
each affected base. 
(4) An explanation of the criteria used for selecting the 
affected bases and the particular fighters chosen for retirement. 
(5) A description of the environmental analyses being con-
ducted. 
(6) An identification of the reassignment and manpower 
authorizations necessary for the Air Force personnel (both 
active duty and reserve component) affected by the retirements 
if such retirements are accomplished. 
(7) A description of the funding needed in fiscal years 
2010 through 2015 to cover operation and maintenance costs, 
personnel, and aircraft procurement, if the restructuring plan 
is not carried out. 
(8) An estimate of the cost avoidance should the restruc-
turing plan more forward and a description of how such funds 
would be invested during the future-years defense plan to 
ensure the remaining fighter force achieves the desired service 
life and is sufficiently modernized to outpace the threat. 
(c) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN AIRCRAFT.—The prohibition in sub-
section (a)(1) shall not apply to the five fighter aircraft scheduled 
for retirement in fiscal year 2010, as announced when the budget 
for fiscal year 2009 was submitted to Congress. 
SEC. 1076. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CARRIER AIR WING 
FORCE STRUCTURE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) Section 5062(b) of title 10, United States Code, requires 
the Department of the Navy to maintain not less than 11 
operational aircraft carriers. 
(2) In repeated testimony before Congress, the Navy has 
pledged its long-term commitment to naval combat forces that 
include 11 operational aircraft carriers and 10 carrier air wings, 
composed of 44 strike-fighter aircraft per wing. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) in addition to the forces described in section 5062(b) 
of title 10, United States Code, the Navy should meet its 
current requirement for 10 carrier air wings (even if the number 
of aircraft carriers is temporarily reduced) that are comprised 
of not less than 44 strike-fighter aircraft, in addition to any 
other aircraft associated with the air wing; and 
(2) the Congress and the Secretary of the Navy should 
take all appropriate actions necessary to achieve the current 
requirement for such carrier air wings until such time that 
modifications to the carrier air wing force structure are war-
ranted and the Secretary of the Navy provides Congress with 
a justification of any proposed modifications, supported by rig-
orous and sufficient warfighting analysis.
H. R. 2647—288 
SEC. 1077. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS USE OF SERVICE 
DOGS FOR THE TREATMENT OR REHABILITATION OF VET-
ERANS 
WITH 
PHYSICAL 
OR 
MENTAL 
INJURIES 
OR 
DISABILITIES. 
(a) PROGRAM REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall commence a three-year study to assess the benefits, feasibility, 
and advisability of using service dogs for the treatment or 
rehabilitation of veterans with physical or mental injuries or disabil-
ities, including post-traumatic stress disorder. 
(b) PARTNERSHIPS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out the study 
by partnering with nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations that— 
(A) would not charge veterans who participate in the 
study fees for the dogs, services, or lodging that they pro-
vide; and 
(B) are accredited by, or adhere to standards com-
parable to those of, an accrediting organization with dem-
onstrated experience, national scope, and recognized leader-
ship and expertise in the training of service dogs and 
education in the use of service dogs. 
(2) REIMBURSEMENT
OF
COSTS.—The Secretary shall 
reimburse partners $10,000 for each dog provided to a veteran 
who enrolls in the study and successfully completes a training 
program offered by one of the partners. 
(c) PARTICIPATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—As part of the study, the Secretary shall, 
subject to paragraph (2), arrange for the provision of a service 
dog to the greater of the following: 
(A) 200 veterans. 
(B) A sufficient number of such veterans to produce 
scientifically valid results with respect to assessing the 
benefits and costs of the use of such dogs for the treatment 
or rehabilitation of such veterans. 
(2) NUMBER OF VETERANS.—The Department of Veterans 
Affairs may provide dogs to fewer than 200 veterans if, despite 
its sustained and repeated efforts, it is unable to recruit 200 
veterans to participate in the study referred to in subsection 
(d). 
(3) ELIGIBLE
VETERANS.—A veteran is eligible to enroll 
and participate in the study on an ongoing basis if: 
(A) The veteran has physical disabilities (other than 
blindness or hearing impairment) or mental injuries or 
disabilities. 
(B) A Department of Veterans Affairs provider deter-
mines, based on clinical evaluation of efficacy, that the 
veteran is an appropriate candidate for the study and may 
potentially benefit from a service dog. 
(C) The veteran agrees to successfully complete a 
training program arranged by the Department of Veterans 
Affairs and offered by a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization 
that is accredited by, or adheres to standards comparable 
to those of, an accrediting organization with demonstrated 
experience, national scope, and recognized leadership and 
expertise in the training of service dogs and education 
in the use of service dogs.
H. R. 2647—289 
(4) COMPOSITION.—The Secretary shall ensure that at least 
half of the participants in the study are veterans who suffer 
primarily from a mental health injury or disability. 
(5) AUTHORIZED BENEFITS.—The Department of Veterans 
Affairs will provide to a veteran participating in this study: 
(A) Veterinary treatment to maintain the health of 
the dog and keep it functioning in its prescribed role. 
(B) Hardware required by the dog to perform its tasks, 
and repairs to such hardware. 
(C) Payments and allowances for travel incurred in 
becoming adjusted to the service dogs, to be paid in the 
same manner that payments and allowances are authorized 
under section 111 of title 38, United States Code, and 
its implementing regulations. 
(6) ADDITIONAL
BENEFIT
FOR
ASSOCIATED
EXPENSES.—As 
an incentive for participation in the study, veterans partici-
pating in the study will receive from the Department of Vet-
erans Affairs a monthly payment of $75 to offset costs associ-
ated with the dog in addition to those identified in paragraph 
(5), such as services not prescribed or performed by a veteri-
narian, including but not limited to, license tags (if required), 
food, grooming, nail trimming, boarding, and over-the-counter 
medications. 
(7) OPTION FOR OWNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR, 
THE DOG AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE STUDY.—At the end 
of the study the veteran will have the option of ownership 
of the dog. If the veteran does not wish to retain the dog, 
the 501(c)(3) organization that provided the dog will be respon-
sible for caring for or appropriately placing the dog. In any 
case after completion of the study, or if and when the veteran 
chooses to not participate in the study until completion, further 
responsibility by the Department of Veterans Affairs for any 
benefits in this provision will cease. Further, the Department 
of Veterans Affairs’ liability related to the dog will cease. 
(d) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a scientifically valid 
research study of the costs and benefits associated with the use 
of service dogs for the treatment or rehabilitation of veterans with 
physical or mental injuries or disabilities. The matters studied 
shall include the following: 
(1) The therapeutic benefits to such veterans, including 
the quality of life benefits reported by the veterans partaking 
in the study. 
(2) The economic benefits of using service dogs for the 
treatment or rehabilitation of such veterans, including— 
(A) savings on health care costs, including savings 
related to reductions in hospitalization and reductions in 
the use of prescription drugs; and 
(B) productivity and employment gains for the vet-
erans. 
(e) REPORTS.— 
(1) ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY.—After each year 
of the study, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
on the findings of the Secretary with respect to the study. 
(2) 
FINAL
REPORT
BY
THE
NATIONAL
ACADEMY
OF 
SCIENCES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
completion of the study, the National Academy of Sciences 
shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.
H. R. 2647—290 
(f) FUNDING.—The study under this section is subject to the 
availability of appropriations provided to the Department of Vet-
erans Affairs for such purpose. 
SEC. 1078. PLAN FOR SUSTAINMENT OF LAND-BASED SOLID ROCKET 
MOTOR INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall review and 
establish a plan to sustain the solid rocket motor industrial base, 
including the ability to maintain and sustain currently deployed 
strategic and missile defense systems and to maintain an intellec-
tual and engineering capacity to support next generation rocket 
motors, as needed. 
(b) SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—Not later than June 1, 2010, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees the plan required under subsection (a). 
SEC. 1079. JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE AND TERRORISM. 
It is the sense of Congress that the claims of American victims 
of torture and hostage taking by the Government of Iraq during 
the regime of Saddam Hussein that are subject to Presidential 
Determination Number 2008-9 of January 28, 2008, which waived 
application of section 1083 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008, should be resolved by a prompt and 
fair settlement negotiated between the Government of Iraq and 
the Government of the United States, taking note of the provisions 
of H.R. 5167 of the 110th Congress, which was adopted by the 
United States House of Representatives. 
SEC. 1080. REQUIREMENT FOR VIDEOTAPING OR OTHERWISE ELEC-
TRONICALLY 
RECORDING 
STRATEGIC 
INTELLIGENCE 
INTERROGATIONS OF PERSONS IN THE CUSTODY OF OR 
UNDER THE EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF THE DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE. 
(a) 
VIDEOTAPING
OR
OTHER
ELECTRONIC
RECORDING 
REQUIRED.—In accordance with the Army Field Manual on Human 
Intelligence Collector Operations (FM 2–22.3, September 2006), or 
any successor thereto, and the guidelines developed pursuant to 
subsection (f), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each 
strategic intelligence interrogation of any person who is in the 
custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense 
or under detention in a Department of Defense facility is videotaped 
or otherwise electronically recorded. 
(b) CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION.—To protect United States 
national security, the safety of the individuals conducting or 
assisting in the conduct of a strategic intelligence interrogation, 
and the privacy of persons described in subsection (a), the Secretary 
of Defense shall provide for the appropriate classification of video-
tapes or other electronic recordings made pursuant to subsection 
(a). The use of such classified videotapes or other electronic 
recordings in proceedings conducted under the Detainee Treatment 
Act of 2005 (title 14 of Public Law 109–163 and title 10 of Public 
Law 109–148), the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (10 U.S.C. 
948 et seq.; Public Law 109–366), as amended by section 1802 
of this Act, or at any other judicial or administrative forum under 
any other provision of law shall be governed by applicable rules, 
regulations, and laws that protect classified information.
H. R. 2647—291 
(c) STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION DEFINED.—For 
purposes of this section, the term ‘‘strategic intelligence interroga-
tion’’ means an interrogation of a person described in subsection 
(a) conducted at a theater-level detention facility. 
(d) EXCLUSION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 
as requiring— 
(1) any member of the Armed Forces engaged in direct 
combat operations to videotape or otherwise electronically 
record an interrogation of a person described in subsection 
(a); or 
(2) the videotaping of or otherwise electronically recording 
of tactical questioning, as such term is defined in the Army 
Field Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations (FM 
2–22.3, September 2006), or any successor thereto. 
(e) WAIVER.— 
(1) WAIVERS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may, 
as an exceptional measure, as part of a specific interrogation 
plan for a specific person described in subsection (a), waive 
the requirement in that subsection on a case-by-case basis 
for a period not to exceed 30 days, if the Secretary— 
(A) makes a determination in writing that such a 
waiver is necessary to the national security interests of 
the United States; and 
(B) by not later than five days after the date on which 
such a determination is made, submits to the Committees 
on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representa-
tives, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 
notice of that determination, including a justification for 
that determination. 
(2) SUSPENSIONS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary may tempo-
rarily suspend the requirement under subsection (a) at a spe-
cific theater-level detention facility for a period not to exceed 
30 days, if the Secretary— 
(A) makes a determination in writing that such a 
suspension is vital to the national security interests of 
the United States; and 
(B) by not later than five days after the date on which 
such a determination is made, submits to the Committees 
on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representa-
tives, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 
notice of that determination, including a justification for 
that determination. 
(3) LIMITATION
ON
DELEGATION
OF
AUTHORITY.—This 
authority of the Secretary under this subsection may only be 
delegated as follows: 
(A) In the case of the authority under paragraph (1), 
such authority may not be delegated below the level of 
the combatant commander of the theater in which the 
detention facility holding the person is located. 
(B) In the case of the authority under paragraph (2), 
such authority may not be delegated below the level of 
the Deputy Secretary of Defense. 
(4) EXTENSIONS.—The Secretary may extend a waiver 
under paragraph (1) for one additional 30-day period, or a
H. R. 2647—292 
suspension under paragraph (2) for one additional 30-day 
period, if— 
(A) the Secretary— 
(i) in the case of such a waiver, makes a determina-
tion in writing that such an extension is necessary 
to the national security interests of the United State; 
or 
(ii) in the case of such a suspension, makes a 
determination in writing that such an extension is 
vital to the national security interests of the United 
States; and 
(B) by not later than five days after the date on which 
such a determination is made, the Secretary submits to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 
of Representatives, the House Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence, and the Senate Select Committee on Intel-
ligence notice of that determination, including a justifica-
tion for that determination. 
(f) GUIDELINES.— 
(1) DEVELOPMENT
OF
GUIDELINES.—The Secretary of 
Defense, acting through the Judge Advocates General (as 
defined in section 801(1) of title 10, United States Code, (Article 
1 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)), shall develop and 
adopt uniform guidelines for videotaping or otherwise electroni-
cally recording strategic intelligence interrogations as required 
under subsection (a). Such guidelines shall, at a minimum— 
(A) promote full compliance with the laws of the United 
States; 
(B) promote the exploitation of intelligence; 
(C) address the retention, maintenance, and disposition 
of videotapes or other electronic recordings, consistent with 
subparagraphs (A) and (B) and with the interests of justice; 
and 
(D) ensure the safety of all participants in the interro-
gations. 
(2) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after 
the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing 
the guidelines developed under paragraph (1). Such report shall 
be in an unclassified form but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 1081. MODIFICATION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON COMMERCIAL FEE- 
FOR-SERVICE AIR REFUELING SUPPORT FOR THE AIR 
FORCE. 
Section 1081(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 335; 10 U.S.C. 
2461 note) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
of the first sentence the following: ‘‘, unless the Secretary of Defense 
submits notification to the congressional defense committees that 
pursuing such a program is not in the national interest’’. 
SEC. 1082. MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS UNDER PILOT PROGRAM ON 
COMMERCIAL FEE-FOR-SERVICE AIR REFUELING SUP-
PORT FOR THE AIR FORCE. 
(a) MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning 
with the fiscal year 2011 program year, for purposes of conducting
H. R. 2647—293 
the pilot program on utilizing commercial fee-for-service air 
refueling tanker aircraft for Air Force operations required by section 
1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 335). 
(b) COMPLIANCE WITH LAW APPLICABLE TO MULTIYEAR CON-
TRACTS.—Any contract entered into under subsection (a) shall be 
entered into in accordance with the provisions of section 2306c 
of title 10, United States Code, except that— 
(1) the term of the contract may not be more than 8 
years; and 
(2) notwithstanding section 2306c(b) of such title, the 
authority under section 2306c(a) of such title shall apply to 
the fee-for-service air refueling pilot program. 
(c) COMPLIANCE WITH LAW APPLICABLE
TO SERVICE CON-
TRACTS.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall be 
entered into in accordance with the provisions of section 2401 
of title 10, United States Code, except that— 
(1) the Secretary shall not be required to certify to the 
congressional defense committees that the contract is the most 
cost-effective means of obtaining commercial fee-for-service air 
refueling tanker aircraft for Air Force operations; and 
(2) the Secretary shall not be required to certify to the 
congressional defense committees that there is no alternative 
for meeting urgent operational requirements other than making 
the contract. 
(d) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The amount of a contract under 
subsection (a) may not exceed $999,999,999. 
(e) PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT INSURANCE.—A commercial air 
operator contracting with the Department of Defense under the 
pilot program referred to in subsection (a) shall be eligible to 
receive Government-provided insurance pursuant to chapter 443 
of title 49, United States Code, if commercial insurance is unavail-
able on reasonable terms and conditions. 
SEC. 1083. DISCLOSURE OF NAMES OF STUDENTS AND INSTRUCTORS 
AT WESTERN HEMISPHERE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY 
COOPERATION. 
(a) DISCLOSURE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall release 
to the public, upon request, the information described in para-
graph (2) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010. 
(2) CONTENT.—The information to be released under para-
graph (1) shall include, with respect to the fiscal year covered, 
the entire name, including the first, middle, and surnames, 
with respect to each student and instructor at the Western 
Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. 
(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the require-
ment under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines it to be 
in the national interest. 
SEC. 1084. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WESTERN HEMI-
SPHERE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY COOPERATION. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Coopera-
tion—
H. R. 2647—294 
(A) offers quality professional military bilingual 
instruction for military officers and noncommissioned offi-
cers that promotes democracy, subordination to civilian 
authority, and respect for human rights; and 
(B) is uniquely positioned to support the modernization 
of Latin America security forces as they work to transcend 
their own controversial pasts; 
(2) the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Coopera-
tion is building partner capacity which enhances regional and 
global security while encouraging respect for human rights 
and promoting democratic principles among eligible military 
personnel, law enforcement officials, and civilians of nations 
of the Western Hemisphere; 
(3) the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Coopera-
tion is an invaluable education and training facility the cur-
riculum of which is not duplicated in any of the military depart-
ments and is not replaceable by professional military education 
funded by appropriations for International Military Education 
and Training, for which education is not conducted in Spanish 
and does not concentrate on regional challenges; and 
(4) the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Coopera-
tion is an essential tool to educate future generations of Latin 
American leaders and improve United States relationships with 
partner nations that are working with the United States to 
promote democracy, prosperity, and stability in the Western 
Hemisphere. 
TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 
MATTERS 
Subtitle A—Personnel 
Sec. 1101. Authority to employ individuals completing the National Security Edu-
cation Program. 
Sec. 1102. Authority for employment by Department of Defense of individuals who 
have successfully completed the requirements of the science, mathe-
matics, and research for transformation (SMART) defense scholarship 
program. 
Sec. 1103. Authority for the employment of individuals who have successfully com-
pleted the Department of Defense information assurance scholarship 
program. 
Sec. 1104. Extension and modification of experimental personnel management pro-
gram for scientific and technical personnel. 
Sec. 1105. Modification to Department of Defense laboratory personnel authority. 
Sec. 1106. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 
pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 
working overseas. 
Sec. 1107. Extension of certain benefits to Federal civilian employees on official 
duty in Pakistan. 
Sec. 1108. Requirement for Department of Defense strategic workforce plans. 
Sec. 1109. Adjustments to limitations on personnel and requirement for annual 
manpower reporting. 
Sec. 1110. Pilot program for the temporary exchange of information technology per-
sonnel. 
Sec. 1111. Availability of funds for compensation of certain civilian employees of 
the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 1112. Department of defense civilian leadership program. 
Sec. 1113. Provisions relating to the National Security Personnel System. 
Sec. 1114. Provisions relating to the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel Sys-
tem. 
Subtitle B—Provisions Relating to Reemployment of Annuitants 
Sec. 1121. Authority to expand scope of provisions relating to unreduced compensa-
tion for certain reemployed annuitants.
H. R. 2647—295 
Sec. 1122. Part-time reemployment. 
Sec. 1123. Government Accountability Office report. 
Subtitle A—Personnel 
SEC. 1101. AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY INDIVIDUALS COMPLETING THE 
NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION PROGRAM. 
Section 802 of the David L. Boren National Security Education 
Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1902) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection: 
‘‘(k) EMPLOYMENT OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS.—The Secretary 
of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of 
State, or the head of a Federal agency or office identified by the 
Secretary of Defense under subsection (g) as having national secu-
rity responsibilities— 
‘‘(1) may, without regard to any provision of title 5 gov-
erning appointments in the competitive service, appoint to a 
position that is identified under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) as having 
national security responsibilities, or to a position in such Fed-
eral agency or office, in the excepted service an individual 
who has successfully completed an academic program for which 
a scholarship or fellowship under this section was awarded 
and who, under the terms of the agreement for such scholarship 
or fellowship, at the time of such appointment owes a service 
commitment to such Department or such Federal agency or 
office; and 
‘‘(2) may, upon satisfactory completion of two years of 
substantially continuous service by an incumbent who was 
appointed to an excepted service position under the authority 
of paragraph (1), convert the appointment of such individual, 
without competition, to a career or career conditional appoint-
ment.’’. 
SEC. 1102. AUTHORITY FOR EMPLOYMENT BY DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY 
COMPLETED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCIENCE, 
MATHEMATICS, AND RESEARCH FOR TRANSFORMATION 
(SMART) DEFENSE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. 
(a) AUTHORITY
FOR EMPLOYMENT.—Subsection (d) of section 
2192a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(d) EMPLOYMENT OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS.—The Secretary 
of Defense— 
‘‘(1) may, without regard to any provision of title 5 gov-
erning appointment of employees to competitive service posi-
tions within the Department of Defense, appoint to a position 
in the Department of Defense in the excepted service an indi-
vidual who has successfully completed an academic program 
for which a scholarship or fellowship under this section was 
awarded and who, under the terms of the agreement for such 
scholarship or fellowship, at the time of such appointment, 
owes a service commitment to the Department; and 
‘‘(2) may, upon satisfactory completion of 2 years of substan-
tially continuous service by an incumbent who was appointed 
to an excepted service position under the authority of paragraph 
(1), convert the appointment of such individual, without com-
petition, to a career or career conditional appointment.’’.
H. R. 2647—296 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section 
is amended by striking ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (d), the’’ 
in the second sentence and inserting ‘‘The’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (f) of such section 
is amended— 
(1) by striking the first sentence; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘the authorities provided in such chapter’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the other authorities provided in this chapter’’. 
(d) REPEAL OF OBSOLETE PROVISIONS.—(1) Such section is fur-
ther amended by striking subsection (g) and by redesignating sub-
section (h) as subsection (g). 
(2) Subparagraph (B) of section 3304(a)(3) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(B) the Office of Personnel Management has deter-
mined that there exists a severe shortage of candidates 
or that there is a critical hiring need.’’. 
SEC. 1103. AUTHORITY FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF INDIVIDUALS WHO 
HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE INFORMATION ASSURANCE SCHOLARSHIP PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2200a of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(g) EMPLOYMENT OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS.—The Secretary 
of Defense— 
‘‘(1) may, without regard to any provision of title 5 gov-
erning appointments in the competitive service, appoint to an 
information technology position in the Department of Defense 
in the excepted service an individual who has successfully 
completed an academic program for which a scholarship under 
this section was awarded and who, under the terms of the 
agreement for such scholarship, at the time of such appointment 
owes a service commitment to the Department; and 
‘‘(2) may, upon satisfactory completion of two years of 
substantially continuous service by an incumbent who was 
appointed to an excepted service position under the authority 
of paragraph (1), convert the appointment of such individual, 
without competition, to a career or career conditional appoint-
ment.’’. 
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of such section 
is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (g),’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 
(f),’’. 
SEC. 1104. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL PER-
SONNEL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR SCIENTIFIC AND 
TECHNICAL PERSONNEL. 
(a) THREE-YEAR EXTENSION.—Subsection (e)(1) of section 1101 
of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by striking 
‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 
(b) LIMITATIONS ON ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS.—Such section is 
further amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘under subsection (d)(1)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘under subsection (d)’’; and 
(2) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(d) LIMITATIONS
ON ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS.—(1) Subject to 
paragraph (3), the total amount of additional payments paid to
H. R. 2647—297 
an employee under subsection (b)(3) for any 12-month period may 
not exceed the lesser of the following amounts: 
‘‘(A) $50,000 in fiscal year 2010, which may be adjusted 
annually thereafter by the Secretary, with a percentage 
increase equal to one-half of 1 percentage point less than the 
percentage by which the Employment Cost Index, published 
quarterly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the base quarter 
of the year before the preceding calendar year exceeds the 
Employment Cost Index for the base quarter of the second 
year before the preceding calendar year. 
‘‘(B) The amount equal to 50 percent of the employee’s 
annual rate of basic pay. 
‘‘(2) In paragraph (1), the term ‘base quarter’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 5302(3) of title 5, United States Code. 
‘‘(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or 
section 5307 of title 5, United States Code, no additional payments 
may be paid to an employee under subsection (b)(3) in any calendar 
year if, or to the extent that, the employee’s total annual compensa-
tion in such calendar year will exceed the maximum amount of 
total annual compensation payable at the salary set in accordance 
with section 104 of title 3, United States Code. 
‘‘(4) An employee appointed under the program is not eligible 
for any bonus, monetary award, or other monetary incentive for 
service under the appointment other than payments authorized 
by this section.’’. 
(c) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (g) 
of such section is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(1)(A) Not later than December 31 of each year in which 
the authority under this section is in effect, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the committees of Congress specified 
in subparagraph (B) a report on the operation of this section. 
Each report shall cover the fiscal year that most recently ended 
before such December 31. 
‘‘(B) The committees of Congress specified in this subpara-
graph are— 
‘‘(i) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and 
‘‘(ii) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee 
on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.’’. 
SEC. 1105. MODIFICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORY 
PERSONNEL AUTHORITY. 
(a) DESIGNATION OF LABORATORIES.—Each of the following is 
hereby designated as a Department of Defense science and tech-
nology reinvention laboratory (as described in section 342(b) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public 
Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of 
the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2001): 
(1) The Aviation and Missile Research Development and 
Engineering Center. 
(2) The Army Research Laboratory. 
(3) The Medical Research and Materiel Command. 
(4) The Engineer Research and Development Command. 
(5) The Communications-Electronics Command.
H. R. 2647—298 
(6) The Soldier and Biological Chemical Command. 
(7) The Naval Sea Systems Command Centers. 
(8) The Naval Research Laboratory. 
(9) The Office of Naval Research. 
(10) The Air Force Research Laboratory. 
(11) The Tank and Automotive Research Development and 
Engineering Center. 
(12) 
The 
Armament 
Research 
Development 
and 
Engineering Center. 
(13) The Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division. 
(14) The Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division. 
(15) The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific. 
(16) The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, 
Atlantic. 
(17) The laboratories within the Army Research Develop-
ment and Engineering Command. 
(b) CONVERSION PROCEDURES.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
implement procedures to convert the civilian personnel of each 
Department of Defense science and technology reinvention labora-
tory, as so designated by subsection (a), from the personnel system 
which applies as of the date of the enactment of this Act to the 
personnel system under an appropriate demonstration project (as 
referred to in such section 342(b)). Any conversion under this sub-
section— 
(1) shall not adversely affect any employee with respect 
to pay or any other term or condition of employment; 
(2) shall be consistent with section 4703(f) of title 5, United 
States Code; 
(3) shall be completed within 18 months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act; and 
(4) shall not apply to prevailing rate employees (as defined 
by section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code) or senior 
executives (as defined by section 3132(a)(3) of such title). 
(c) LIMITATION.—The science and technology reinvention labora-
tories, as so designated by subsection (a), may not implement any 
personnel system, other than a personnel system under an appro-
priate demonstration project (as referred to in such section 342(b)), 
without prior congressional authorization. 
SEC. 1106. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 
LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITA-
TION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 
WORKING OVERSEAS. 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1101 
of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615) is amended by 
striking ‘‘calendar year 2009,’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar years 2009 
and 2010,’’. 
(b) RELATED PROVISION.—Subsection (b) of such section 1101 
is amended to read as follows:. 
‘‘(b) APPLICABILITY OF AGGREGATE LIMITATION ON PAY.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 5307 of title 5, United States 
Code, shall not apply to any employee in any calendar year 
in which that employee is granted a waiver under subsection 
(a).
H. R. 2647—299 
‘‘(2) OTHER LIMITATIONS.—In the case of any employees 
who (disregarding subparagraph (A)) would otherwise be sub-
ject to a limitation on premium pay similar to one set forth 
in section 5547 of title 5, United States Code (as determined 
by the head of the Executive agency in or under which such 
employees are employed)— 
‘‘(A) the agency head may waive that otherwise 
applicable limitation, to the same extent and in the same 
manner as would be allowable under subsection (a) if those 
employees were instead subject to such section 5547; and 
‘‘(B) if a waiver under subparagraph (A) is granted 
with respect to such employees, then, neither section 5307 
of title 5, United States Code, nor any other similar limita-
tion (as determined by the agency head) shall apply with 
respect to such employees for purposes of any calendar 
year for which such waiver is so granted.’’. 
SEC. 1107. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BENEFITS TO FEDERAL CIVILIAN 
EMPLOYEES ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN PAKISTAN. 
Section 1603(a)(2) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropria-
tions Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 120 Stat. 443), as amended 
by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616), 
is amended by inserting ‘‘Pakistan or’’ after ‘‘is on official duty 
in’’. 
SEC. 1108. REQUIREMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STRATEGIC 
WORKFORCE PLANS. 
(a) CODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGIC WORKFORCE 
PLAN.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding after section 115a the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 115b. Annual strategic workforce plan 
‘‘(a) ANNUAL PLAN REQUIRED.—(1) The Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees on an annual 
basis a strategic workforce plan to shape and improve the civilian 
employee workforce of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readi-
ness shall have overall responsibility for developing and imple-
menting the strategic workforce plan, in consultation with the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logis-
tics. 
‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—Each strategic workforce plan under sub-
section (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 
‘‘(1) An assessment of— 
‘‘(A) the critical skills and competencies that will be 
needed in the future within the civilian employee workforce 
by the Department of Defense to support national security 
requirements and effectively manage the Department 
during the seven-year period following the year in which 
the plan is submitted; 
‘‘(B) the appropriate mix of military, civilian, and con-
tractor personnel capabilities;
H. R. 2647—300 
‘‘(C) the critical skills and competencies of the existing 
civilian employee workforce of the Department and pro-
jected trends in that workforce based on expected losses 
due to retirement and other attrition; and 
‘‘(D) gaps in the existing or projected civilian employee 
workforce of the Department that should be addressed 
to ensure that the Department has continued access to 
the critical skills and competencies described in subpara-
graphs (A) and (C). 
‘‘(2) A plan of action for developing and reshaping the 
civilian employee workforce of the Department to address the 
gaps in critical skills and competencies identified under para-
graph (1)(D), including— 
‘‘(A) specific recruiting and retention goals, especially 
in areas identified as critical skills and competencies under 
paragraph (1), including the program objectives of the 
Department to be achieved through such goals and the 
funding needed to achieve such goals; 
‘‘(B) 
specific 
strategies 
for 
developing, 
training, 
deploying, compensating, and motivating the civilian 
employee workforce of the Department, including the pro-
gram objectives of the Department to be achieved through 
such strategies and the funding needed to implement such 
strategies; 
‘‘(C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain any 
civilian personnel possessing the skills and competencies 
identified under paragraph (1); 
‘‘(D) any changes in the number of personnel author-
ized in any category of personnel listed in subsection (f)(1) 
or in the acquisition workforce that may be needed to 
address such gaps and effectively meet the needs of the 
Department; 
‘‘(E) any changes in resources or in the rates or 
methods of pay for any category of personnel listed in 
subsection (f)(1) or in the acquisition workforce that may 
be needed to address inequities and ensure that the Depart-
ment has full access to appropriately qualified personnel 
to address such gaps and meet the needs of the Depart-
ment; and 
‘‘(F) any legislative changes that may be necessary 
to achieve the goals referred to in subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(3) An assessment, using results-oriented performance 
measures, of the progress of the Department in implementing 
the strategic workforce plan under this section during the pre-
vious year. 
‘‘(4) Any additional matters the Secretary of Defense con-
siders necessary to address. 
‘‘(c) SENIOR
MANAGEMENT, FUNCTIONAL, 
AND
TECHNICAL 
WORKFORCE.—(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection 
(a) shall include a separate chapter to specifically address the 
shaping and improvement of the senior management, functional, 
and technical workforce (including scientists and engineers) of the 
Department of Defense. 
‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, 
with respect to such senior management, functional, and technical 
workforce—
H. R. 2647—301 
‘‘(A) an assessment of the matters set forth in subpara-
graphs (A) through (D) of subsection (b)(1); 
‘‘(B) a plan of action meeting the requirements set forth 
in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of subsection (b)(2); 
‘‘(C) specific strategies for developing, training, deploying, 
compensating, motivating, and designing career paths and 
career opportunities; and 
‘‘(D) specific steps that the Department has taken or plans 
to take to ensure that such workforce is managed in compliance 
with the requirements of section 129 of this title. 
‘‘(d) DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE.—(1) Each strategic 
workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include a separate chapter 
to specifically address the shaping and improvement of the defense 
acquisition workforce, including both military and civilian per-
sonnel. 
‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, 
with respect to the defense acquisition workforce— 
‘‘(A) an assessment of the matters set forth in subpara-
graphs (A) through (D) of subsection (b)(1); 
‘‘(B) a plan of action meeting the requirements set forth 
in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of subsection (b)(2); 
‘‘(C) specific steps that the Department has taken or plans 
to take to develop appropriate career paths for civilian 
employees in the acquisition field and to implement the require-
ments of section 1722a of this title with regard to members 
of the armed forces in the acquisition field; and 
‘‘(D) a plan for funding needed improvements in the acquisi-
tion workforce of the Department through the period of the 
future-years defense program, including— 
‘‘(i) the funding programmed for defense acquisition 
workforce improvements, including a specific identification 
of funding provided in the Department of Defense Acquisi-
tion Workforce Fund established under section 1705 of 
this title, along with a description of how such funding 
is being implemented and whether it is being fully used; 
and 
‘‘(ii) a description of any continuing shortfalls in 
funding available for the acquisition workforce. 
‘‘(e) SUBMITTALS BY SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPART-
MENTS
AND HEADS
OF
THE DEFENSE AGENCIES.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall require the Secretary of each military department 
and the head of each Defense Agency to submit a report to the 
Secretary addressing each of the matters described in this section. 
The Secretary of Defense shall establish a deadline for the submittal 
of reports under this subsection that enables the Secretary to con-
sider the material submitted in a timely manner and incorporate 
such material, as appropriate, into the strategic workforce plan 
required by this section. 
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘senior management, functional, and technical 
workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following 
categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel: 
‘‘(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under 
section 3131 of title 5. 
‘‘(B) Persons serving in positions described in section 
5376(a) of title 5.
H. R. 2647—302 
‘‘(C) Highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to 
section 9903 of title 5. 
‘‘(D) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to 
section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), 
as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted 
into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A–315)). 
‘‘(E) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to 
section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 
note). 
‘‘(F) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior 
Executive Service under section 1606 of this title. 
‘‘(G) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level posi-
tions under section 1607 of this title. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ includes individuals 
designated under section 1721 as filling acquisition positions.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 115a the following new item: 
‘‘115b. Annual strategic workforce plan.’’. 
(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORT
ON
STRATEGIC
WORKFORCE
PLAN.—Not later 
than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense 
submits to the congressional defense committees an annual 
strategic workforce plan under section 115b of title 10, United 
States Code (as added by subsection (a)), in each of 2009, 
2010, 2011, and 2012, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report on the plan so submitted. 
(2) REPORT ON THE TRAINING OF ACQUISITION AND AUDIT 
PERSONNEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—(A) Not later 
than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth 
an assessment of the efficacy of Department of Defense training 
for acquisition and audit personnel of the Department of 
Defense. 
(B) The report required under subparagraph (A) shall 
address the efficacy of training, the extent to which such 
training reaches appropriate personnel, and the extent to which 
the training recommendations of previous reviews (including 
the recommendations of the Commission on Army Acquisition 
and Program Management in Expeditionary Operations) have 
been implemented. 
(c) CONFORMING
REPEALS.—The following provisions are 
repealed: 
(1) Section 1122 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3452; 
10 U.S.C. note prec. 1580). 
(2) Section 1102 of the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 
120 Stat. 2407).
H. R. 2647—303 
(3) Section 851 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 247; 10 
U.S.C. note prec. 1580). 
SEC. 1109. ADJUSTMENTS TO LIMITATIONS ON PERSONNEL AND 
REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL MANPOWER REPORTING. 
(a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 1111 of the Duncan Hunter National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 
417; 122 Stat. 4619) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘for four’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1) of subsection (b), by striking ‘‘require-
ments of—’’ and all that follows through the end of subpara-
graph (C) and inserting ‘‘the requirements of section 115b of 
this title; or’’; 
(3) in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), by striking ‘‘purpose 
described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (c).’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘any of the following purposes: 
‘‘(A) Performance of inherently governmental functions. 
‘‘(B) Performance of work pursuant to section 2463 
of title 10, United States Code. 
‘‘(C) Ability to maintain sufficient organic expertise 
and technical capability. 
‘‘(D) Performance of work that, while the position may 
not exercise an inherently governmental function, neverthe-
less should be performed only by officers or employees 
of the Federal Government or members of the Armed Forces 
because of the critical nature of the work.’’; and 
(4) by striking subsections (c) and (d). 
(b) CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT.— 
(1) INCLUSION IN ANNUAL DEFENSE MANPOWER REQUIRE-
MENTS REPORT.—Section 115a of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
subsection: 
‘‘(f) The Secretary shall also include in each such report the 
following information with respect to personnel assigned to or sup-
porting major Department of Defense headquarters activities: 
‘‘(1) The military end strength and civilian full-time equiva-
lents assigned to major Department of Defense headquarters 
activities for the preceding fiscal year and estimates of such 
numbers for the current fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. 
‘‘(2) A summary of the replacement during the preceding 
fiscal year of contract workyears providing support to major 
Department of Defense headquarters activities with military 
end strength or civilian full-time equivalents, including an esti-
mate of the number of contract workyears associated with 
the replacement of contracts performing inherently govern-
mental or exempt functions. 
‘‘(3) The plan for the continued review of contract personnel 
supporting major Department of Defense headquarters activi-
ties for possible conversion to military or civilian performance 
in accordance with section 2463 of this title. 
‘‘(4) The amount of any adjustment in the limitation on 
personnel made by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary 
of a military department, and, for each adjustment made pursu-
ant to section 1111(b)(2) of the Duncan Hunter National
H. R. 2647—304 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 
143 note), the purpose of the adjustment.’’. 
(2) TECHNICAL
AMENDMENTS
TO
REFLECT
NAME
OF 
REPORT.— 
(A) Subsection (a) of section 115a of such title is 
amended by inserting ‘‘defense’’ before ‘‘manpower require-
ments report.’’. 
(B)(i) The heading of such section is amended to read 
as follows: 
‘‘§ 115a. Annual defense manpower requirements report’’. 
(ii) The item relating to such section in the table 
of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘115a. Annual defense manpower requirements report.’’. 
(3) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 
901 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 272; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) 
are repealed. 
SEC. 1110. PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE TEMPORARY EXCHANGE OF 
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL. 
(a) ASSIGNMENT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may, 
with the agreement of the private sector organization concerned, 
arrange for the temporary assignment of an employee to such 
private sector organization, or from such private sector organization 
to a Department of Defense organization under this section. An 
employee shall be eligible for such an assignment only if— 
(1) the employee— 
(A) works in the field of information technology 
management; 
(B) is considered by the Secretary of Defense to be 
an exceptional employee; 
(C) is expected to assume increased information tech-
nology management responsibilities in the future; and 
(D) is compensated at not less than the GS–11 level 
(or the equivalent); and 
(2) the proposed assignment meets applicable requirements 
of section 209(b) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 
3501 note). 
(b) AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for 
a written agreement among the Department of Defense, the private 
sector organization, and the employee concerned regarding the 
terms and conditions of the employee’s assignment under this sec-
tion. The agreement— 
(1) shall require that employees of the Department of 
Defense, upon completion of the assignment, will serve in the 
civil service for a period equal to the length of the assignment; 
and 
(2) shall provide that if the employee of the Department 
of Defense or of the private sector organization (as the case 
may be) fails to carry out the agreement, such employee shall 
be liable to the United States for payment of all expenses 
of the assignment, unless that failure was for good and suffi-
cient reason, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
H. R. 2647—305 
An amount for which an employee is liable under paragraph (2) 
shall be treated as a debt due the United States. 
(c) TERMINATION.—An assignment under this section may, at 
any time and for any reason, be terminated by the Department 
of Defense or the private sector organization concerned. 
(d) DURATION.—An assignment under this section shall be for 
a period of not less than 3 months and not more than 1 year, 
and may be extended in 3-month increments for a total of not 
more than 1 additional year; however, no assignment under this 
section may commence after September 30, 2013. 
(e) TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES.— 
An employee of a private sector organization who is assigned to 
a Department of Defense organization under this section— 
(1) may continue to receive pay and benefits from the 
private sector organization from which such employee is 
assigned; 
(2) is deemed to be an employee of the Department of 
Defense for the purposes of— 
(A) chapter 73 of title 5, United States Code; 
(B) sections 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 209, 603, 606, 
607, 643, 654, 1905, and 1913 of title 18, United States 
Code; 
(C) sections 1343, 1344, and 1349(b) of title 31, United 
States Code; 
(D) the Federal Tort Claims Act and any other Federal 
tort liability statute; 
(E) the Ethics in Government Act of 1978; 
(F) section 1043 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; 
and 
(G) section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy Act; and 
(3) may not have access to any trade secrets or to any 
other nonpublic information which is of commercial value to 
the private sector organization from which such employee is 
assigned. 
(f) PROHIBITION AGAINST CHARGING CERTAIN COSTS
TO
THE 
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—A private sector organization may not 
charge the Department of Defense or any other agency of the 
Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal 
contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the organization 
to an employee assigned to a Department of Defense organization 
under this section for the period of the assignment. 
(g) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out this section, the Sec-
retary of Defense— 
(1) shall ensure that, of the assignments made under this 
section each year, at least 20 percent are from small business 
concerns (as defined by section 3703(e)(2)(A) of title 5, United 
States Code); and 
(2) shall take into consideration the question of how assign-
ments under this section might best be used to help meet 
the needs of the Department of Defense with respect to the 
training of employees in information technology management. 
(h) NUMERICAL LIMITATION.—In no event may more than 10 
employees be participating in assignments under this section at 
any given time.
H. R. 2647—306 
(i) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—For each of fiscal years 2010 
through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees, not later than 1 month after the end 
of the fiscal year involved, a report on any activities carried out 
under this section during such fiscal year, including information 
concerning— 
(1) the respective organizations (as referred to in subsection 
(a)) to and from which any employee was assigned under this 
section; 
(2) the positions those employees held while they were 
so assigned; 
(3) a description of the tasks they performed while they 
were so assigned; and 
(4) a discussion of any actions that might be taken to 
improve the effectiveness of the program under this section, 
including any proposed changes in law. 
(j) REPEAL
OF SUPERSEDED SECTION.—Section 1109 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 358) is repealed, except that— 
(1) nothing in this subsection shall, in the case of any 
assignment commencing under such section 1109 on or before 
the date of the enactment of this Act, affect— 
(A) the duration of such assignment or the authority 
to extend such assignment in accordance with subsection 
(d) of such section 1109, as last in effect; or 
(B) the terms or conditions of the agreement governing 
such assignment, including with respect to any service 
obligation under subsection (b) thereof; and 
(2) any employee whose assignment is allowed to continue 
by virtue of paragraph (1) shall be taken into account for 
purposes of— 
(A) the numerical limitation under subsection (h); and 
(B) the reporting requirement under subsection (i). 
SEC. 1111. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN 
CIVILIAN 
EMPLOYEES 
OF 
THE 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE. 
(a) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds authorized to be appro-
priated for the Department of Defense that are available for the 
purchase of contract services to meet a requirement that is antici-
pated to continue for five years or more shall be available to 
provide compensation for civilian employees of the Department 
to meet the same requirement. 
(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations 
implementing the authority in subsection (a). Such regulations— 
(1) shall ensure that the authority in subsection (a) is 
utilized to build government capabilities that are needed to 
perform inherently governmental functions, functions closely 
associated with inherently governmental functions, and other 
critical functions; 
(2) shall include a mechanism to ensure that follow-on 
funding to provide compensation for civilian employees of the 
Department to perform functions described in paragraph (1) 
is provided from appropriate accounts; and 
(3) may establish additional criteria and levels of approval 
within the Department for the utilization of funds to provide
H. R. 2647—307 
compensation for civilian employees of the Department pursu-
ant to subsection (a). 
(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the end 
of each fiscal year for which the authority in subsection (a) is 
in effect, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the use of such authority. Each report 
shall cover the preceding fiscal year and shall identify, at a min-
imum, the following: 
(1) The amount of funds used under the authority in sub-
section (a) to provide compensation for civilian employees. 
(2) The source or sources of the funds so used. 
(3) The number of civilian employees employed through 
the use of such funds. 
(4) The actions taken by the Secretary to ensure that 
follow-on funding for such civilian employees is provided 
through appropriate accounts. 
(d) TEMPORARY AUTHORITY.—The authority in subsection (a) 
shall apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal years 2010 through 2019. 
SEC. 1112. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN LEADERSHIP PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) LEADERSHIP PROGRAM REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
establish a program of leadership recruitment and development 
for civilian employees of the Department of Defense, to be 
known as the ‘‘Department of Defense Civilian Leadership Pro-
gram’’ (in this section referred to as the ‘‘program’’). 
(2) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives of the program shall be 
as follows: 
(A) To develop a new generation of civilian leaders 
for the Department of Defense. 
(B) To recruit individuals with the academic merit, 
work experience, and demonstrated leadership skills to 
meet the future needs of the Department. 
(C) To offer rapid advancement, competitive compensa-
tion, and leadership opportunities to highly qualified 
civilian employees of the Department. 
(3) AVAILABLE AUTHORITIES.—In carrying out the program, 
the Secretary may exercise any authority available to the Office 
of Personnel Management under section 4703 of title 5, United 
States Code, except that the Secretary shall not be bound 
by the limitations in subsection (d) of such section. Nothing 
in this section shall be construed to authorize the waiver of 
any part of chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, or any 
regulation implementing such chapter, in the carrying out of 
the program. 
(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The following individuals shall be eligible 
to participate in the program: 
(A) Current employees of the Department of Defense. 
(B) Appropriate individuals in the private sector. 
(2) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS IN PROGRAM.— 
The total number of individuals who may participate in the 
program in any fiscal year may not exceed 5,000.
H. R. 2647—308 
(3) LIMITATION ON PERIOD OF PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM.— 
The maximum period of time that an individual may participate 
in the program is three years. 
(c) ELEMENTS OF PROGRAM.— 
(1) COMPETITIVE ENTRY.—The selection of individuals for 
entry into the program shall be made on the basis of a competi-
tion conducted at least twice each year. In each competition, 
participants in the program shall be selected from among 
applicants determined by the Secretary to be the most highly 
qualified in terms of academic merit, work experience, and 
demonstrated leadership skills. Each competition shall provide 
for entry-level participants and midcareer participants in the 
program. 
(2) ALLOCATION OF POSITIONS.—The Secretary shall allocate 
positions in the program among the components of the Depart-
ment of Defense that— 
(A) offer the most challenging assignments; 
(B) provide the greatest level of responsibility; and 
(C) demonstrate the greatest need for participants in 
the program. 
(3) ASSIGNMENTS TO POSITIONS.—Participants in the pro-
gram shall be assigned to components of the Department that 
best match their skills and qualifications. Participants in the 
program may be rotated among components of the Department 
of Defense at the discretion of the Secretary. 
(4) INITIAL
COMPENSATION.—The initial compensation of 
participants in the program shall be determined by the Sec-
retary based on the qualifications of such participants and 
applicable market conditions. 
(5) EDUCATION AND TRAINING.—The Secretary shall provide 
participants in the program with training, mentoring, and edu-
cational opportunities that are appropriate to facilitate the 
development of such participants into effective civilian leaders 
for the Department of Defense. 
(6) OBJECTIVE, MERIT-BASED
PRINCIPLES
FOR
PERSONNEL 
DECISIONS.—The Secretary shall make personnel decisions 
under the program in accordance with such objective, merit- 
based criteria as the Secretary shall prescribe in regulations 
for purposes of the program. Such criteria shall include, but 
not be limited to, criteria applicable to the following: 
(A) The selection of individuals for entry into the pro-
gram. 
(B) The assignment of participants in the program 
to positions in the Department of Defense. 
(C) The initial compensation of participants in the 
program. 
(D) The access of participants in the program to 
training, mentoring, and educational opportunities under 
the program. 
(E) The consideration of participants in the program 
for selection into the senior management, functional, and 
technical workforce of the Department. 
(7) CONSIDERATION FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT, FUNCTIONAL, 
AND TECHNICAL WORKFORCE.—Any participant in the program 
who, as determined by the Secretary, demonstrates outstanding 
performance shall be afforded priority in consideration for selec-
tion into the appropriate element of the senior management,
H. R. 2647—309 
functional, and technical workforce of the Department of 
Defense (as defined in section 115b(f) of title 10, United States 
Code). 
SEC. 1113. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY PER-
SONNEL SYSTEM. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 
(1) the term ‘‘National Security Personnel System’’ or 
‘‘NSPS’’ refers to a human resources management system estab-
lished under authority of section 9902 of title 5, United States 
Code (as in effect before the date of the enactment of this 
Act); and 
(2) the term ‘‘statutory pay system’’ means a pay system 
under— 
(A) subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United 
States Code (relating to General Schedule pay rates); or 
(B) such other provisions of law as would apply if 
section 9902 of title 5, United States Code, had never 
been enacted. 
(b) REPEAL OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO NSPS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 9902 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(A) by striking subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i) and 
(j); and 
(B) by redesignating subsections (f) through (h) as sub-
sections (e) through (g), respectively. 
(2) EXPANSION
PROHIBITED.—The National Security Per-
sonnel System may not be extended to any organizational or 
functional unit of the Department of Defense (or any component 
thereof) not included in such System as of March 1, 2009. 
(3) CURRENT RULES INVALID.—Any regulations in effect as 
of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act which 
were issued pursuant to any provision of law repealed by para-
graph (1)(A)— 
(A) may not be modified on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, except as necessary to implement 
this Act; and 
(B) shall cease to be effective as of January 1, 2012. 
(c) TERMINATION OF NSPS AND CONVERSION OF EMPLOYEES 
AND POSITIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall take all 
actions which may be necessary to provide, beginning no later 
than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, for 
the orderly termination of the National Security Personnel 
System and conversion of all employees and positions from 
such System, by not later than January 1, 2012, to— 
(A) the statutory pay system and all other aspects 
of the personnel system that last applied to such employee 
or position (as the case may be) before the National Security 
Personnel System applied; or 
(B) if subparagraph (A) does not apply, the statutory 
pay system and all other aspects of the personnel system 
that would have applied if the National Security Personnel 
System had never been established. 
No employee shall suffer any loss of or decrease in pay because 
of the preceding sentence, and, for purposes of carrying out 
such preceding sentence, any determination of the system that
H. R. 2647—310 
last applied (or that would have applied) with respect to an 
employee or position shall take into account any modifications 
to such system pursuant to the provisions of subsections (a) 
and (b) of section 9902 of title 5, United States Code, as 
amended by subsection (d). 
(2) TRANSITION PERIOD APPOINTMENTS.—To the extent prac-
ticable, any individual who, during the NSPS transition period, 
is appointed to any position within the Department of Defense 
which is subject to the NSPS shall be subject to the statutory 
pay system and all other aspects of the personnel system to 
which such individual or position is to be converted in accord-
ance with the requirements of paragraph (1). 
(3) TEMPORARY CONTINUATION OF NSPS.—Notwithstanding 
any other provision of this section, the National Security Per-
sonnel System, as in effect on the day before the date of 
the enactment of this Act, shall continue to apply with respect 
to any employees and positions remaining subject to the NSPS, 
in accordance with paragraph (1), during the NSPS transition 
period. 
(4) RESTORATION OF FULL ANNUAL PAY ADJUSTMENTS UNDER 
NSPS PENDING ITS TERMINATION.—Notwithstanding subsection 
(b)(1)(A), section 9902(e)(7) of title 5, United States Code, to 
the extent that it remains in force under paragraph (3), shall 
be applied by substituting ‘‘100 percent’’ for ‘‘no less than 60 
percent’’. 
(5) NSPS TRANSITION PERIOD DEFINED.—For purposes of 
this subsection, the term ‘‘NSPS transition period’’ means the 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act 
and ending on January 1, 2012. 
(d) AUTHORITY RELATING TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND 
WORKFORCE INCENTIVES, HIRING FLEXIBILITIES, AND TRAINING OF 
SUPERVISORS.—Section 9902 of title 5, United States Code, as 
amended by subsection (b)(1), is further amended by inserting before 
subsection (e) (as so redesignated by subsection (b)(1)(B)) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(a) PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
AND
WORKFORCE
INCEN-
TIVES.—(1) The Secretary, in coordination with the Director, shall 
promulgate regulations providing for the following: 
‘‘(A) A fair, credible, and transparent performance appraisal 
system for employees. 
‘‘(B) A fair, credible, and transparent system for linking 
employee bonuses and other performance-based actions to 
performance appraisals of employees. 
‘‘(C) A process for ensuring ongoing performance feedback 
and dialogue among supervisors, managers, and employees 
throughout the appraisal period and setting timetables for 
review. 
‘‘(D) Development of ‘performance assistance plans’ that 
are designed to give employees formal training, on-the-job 
training, counseling, mentoring, and other assistance. 
‘‘(2) In developing the regulations required by this subsection, 
the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, may waive the 
requirements of chapters 43 (other than sections 4302 and 4303(e)) 
and the regulations implementing such chapters, to the extent 
necessary to achieve the objectives of this subsection.
H. R. 2647—311 
‘‘(3)(A) The Secretary may establish a fund, to be known as 
the ‘Department of Defense Civilian Workforce Incentive Fund’ 
(in this paragraph referred to as the ‘Fund’). 
‘‘(B) The Fund shall consist of the following: 
‘‘(i) Amounts appropriated to the Fund. 
‘‘(ii) Amounts available for compensation of employees that 
are transferred to the Fund. 
‘‘(C) Amounts in the Fund shall be available for the following: 
‘‘(i) Incentive payments for employees based on team or 
individual performance (which payments shall be in addition 
to basic pay). 
‘‘(ii) Incentive payments to attract or retain employees with 
particular or superior qualifications or abilities. 
‘‘(D) The authority provided in this paragraph is in addition 
to, and does not supersede or replace, any authority or source 
of funding otherwise available to the Secretary to pay bonuses 
or make incentive payments to civilian employees of the Depart-
ment. 
‘‘(4)(A) Any action taken by the Secretary under this subsection, 
or to implement this subsection, shall be subject to the requirements 
of subsection (c) and chapter 71. 
‘‘(B) Any rules or regulations promulgated pursuant to this 
subsection shall be deemed an agency rule or regulation under 
section 7117(a)(2), and shall not be deemed a Government-wide 
rule or regulation under section 7117(a)(1). 
‘‘(b) FLEXIBILITIES RELATING TO APPOINTMENTS.—(1) The Sec-
retary, in coordination with the Director, shall promulgate regula-
tions to redesign the procedures which are applied by the Depart-
ment of Defense in making appointments to positions within the 
competitive service in order to— 
‘‘(A) better meet mission needs; 
‘‘(B) respond to managers’ needs and the needs of 
applicants; 
‘‘(C) produce high-quality applicants; 
‘‘(D) support timely decisions; 
‘‘(E) uphold appointments based on merit system principles; 
and 
‘‘(F) promote competitive job offers. 
‘‘(2) In redesigning the process by which such appointments 
shall be made, the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, 
may waive the requirements of chapter 33, and the regulations 
implementing such chapter, to the extent necessary to achieve 
the objectives of this section, while providing for the following: 
‘‘(A) Fair, credible, and transparent methods of establishing 
qualification requirements for, recruitment for, and appoint-
ments to positions. 
‘‘(B) Fair and open competition and equitable treatment 
in the consideration and selection of individuals to positions. 
‘‘(C) Fair, credible, and transparent methods of assigning, 
reassigning, detailing, transferring, or promoting employees. 
‘‘(3) In implementing this subsection, the Secretary shall comply 
with the provisions of section 2302(b)(11), regarding veterans’ pref-
erence requirements, in a manner consistent with that in which 
such provisions are applied under chapter 33. 
‘‘(4)(A) Any action taken by the Secretary under this subsection, 
or to implement this subsection, shall be subject to the requirements 
of subsection (c) and chapter 71.
H. R. 2647—312 
‘‘(B) Any rules or regulations promulgated pursuant to this 
section shall be deemed an agency rule or regulation under section 
7117(a)(2), and shall not be deemed a Government-wide rule or 
regulation under section 7117(a)(1). 
‘‘(c) CRITERIA
FOR USE
OF NEW PERSONNEL AUTHORITIES.— 
In establishing any new performance management and workforce 
incentive system under subsection (a) or utilizing appointment flexi-
bilities under subsection (b), the Secretary shall— 
‘‘(1) adhere to merit principles set forth in section 2301; 
‘‘(2) include a means for ensuring employee involvement 
(for bargaining unit employees, through their exclusive rep-
resentatives) in the design and implementation of such system; 
‘‘(3) provide for adequate training and retraining for super-
visors, managers, and employees in the implementation and 
operation of such system; 
‘‘(4) develop— 
‘‘(A) a comprehensive management succession program 
to provide training to employees to develop managers for 
the agency; and 
‘‘(B) a program to provide training to supervisors on 
actions, options, and strategies a supervisor may use in 
administering such system; 
‘‘(5) include effective transparency and accountability meas-
ures and safeguards to ensure that the management of such 
system is fair, credible, and equitable, including appropriate 
independent reasonableness reviews, internal assessments, and 
employee surveys; 
‘‘(6) utilize the annual strategic workforce plan, required 
by section 115b of title 10; and 
‘‘(7) ensure that adequate agency resources are allocated 
for the design, implementation, and administration of such 
system. 
‘‘(d) DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING PROGRAM FOR SUPERVISORS.— 
(1) The Secretary shall develop— 
‘‘(A) a program to provide training to supervisors on use 
of the new authorities provided in this section, including the 
actions, options, and strategies a supervisor may use in— 
‘‘(i) developing and discussing relevant goals and objec-
tives with the employee, communicating and discussing 
progress relative to performance goals and objectives, and 
conducting performance appraisals; 
‘‘(ii) 
mentoring 
and 
motivating 
employees, 
and 
improving employee performance and productivity; 
‘‘(iii) fostering a work environment characterized by 
fairness, respect, equal opportunity, and attention to the 
quality of the work of employees; 
‘‘(iv) effectively managing employees with unacceptable 
performance; 
‘‘(v) addressing reports of a hostile work environment, 
reprisal, or harassment of or by another supervisor or 
employee; and 
‘‘(vi) otherwise carrying out the duties and responsibil-
ities of a supervisor; 
‘‘(B) a program to provide training to supervisors on the 
prohibited personnel practices under section 2302 (particularly 
with respect to such practices described under subsections (b)(1) 
and (b)(8) of such section), employee collective bargaining and
H. R. 2647—347 
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following 
new subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) A description of commitments or agreements by 
NATO ISAF countries regarding the following: 
‘‘(i) Mutually agreed upon goals. 
‘‘(ii) Strategies to achieve such goals. 
‘‘(iii) Resource and force requirements. 
‘‘(iv) 
Commitments 
and 
pledges 
of 
support 
regarding troops and resource levels.’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (6) as para-
graphs (3) through (7), respectively; and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(2) NON-NATO
ISAF
TROOP-CONTRIBUTING
COUNTRIES.—A 
description of commitments or agreements with non-NATO 
ISAF troop-contributing countries regarding the following: 
‘‘(A) Mutually agreed upon goals. 
‘‘(B) Strategies to achieve such goals. 
‘‘(C) Resource and force requirements. 
‘‘(D) Commitments and pledges of support regarding 
troops and resource levels.’’. 
(c) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED: PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND 
MEASURES OF PROGRESS TOWARD SUSTAINABLE LONG-TERM SECU-
RITY AND STABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN.—Subsection (d)(2) of such 
section is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘individual NATO ISAF 
countries’’ and inserting ‘‘each individual NATO ISAF country’’; 
(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (K) as sub-
paragraphs (D) through (L), respectively; 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(C) With respect to non-NATO ISAF troop-contrib-
uting countries, a listing of contributions from each indi-
vidual country, including levels of troops and equipment, 
the effect of contributions on operations, and unfulfilled 
commitments.’’; 
(4) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) through (L) (as 
redesignated) as subparagraphs (G) through (M), respectively; 
(5) by inserting after subparagraph (E) (as redesignated) 
the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(F) An assessment of progress in ending the ability 
of the insurgency (including the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and 
other anti-government elements), to establish control over 
the population of Afghanistan or regions of Afghanistan 
and establish safe havens in Afghanistan, and to conduct 
attacks inside or outside Afghanistan from such safe 
havens.’’; and 
(6) in subparagraph (J) (as redesignated)— 
(A) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iv); and 
(B) by inserting after clause (i) the following: 
‘‘(ii) The coordination of reconstruction and 
development activities in Afghanistan, including— 
‘‘(I) the roles of members of the Armed Forces 
and non-Armed Forces personnel within the 
staffing of United States-led Provincial Reconstruc-
tion Teams;
H. R. 2647—375 
(1) For aircraft procurement, $1,636,229,000. 
(2) For missile procurement, $481,570,000. 
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles procurement, 
$759,466,000. 
(4) For ammunition procurement, $370,635,000. 
(5) For other procurement, $5,600,326,000. 
SEC. 1503. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2010 for the Joint 
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund in the amount of 
$2,099,850,000. 
(b) USE
AND TRANSFER
OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) 
of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), 
as amended by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds appropriated pursuant to 
the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) and made 
available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised 
Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
(c) MONTHLY OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.—Not 
later than 15 days after the end of each month of fiscal year 
2010, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the Joint Improvised Explosive 
Device Defeat Fund explaining monthly commitments, obligations, 
and expenditures by line of action. 
(d) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 
1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as amended 
by section 1503(e) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4650), is amended by striking subsection (e). 
SEC. 1504. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for procurement accounts of the Navy and Marine Corps 
in amounts as follows: 
(1) For aircraft procurement, Navy, $903,197,000. 
(2) For weapons procurement, Navy, $50,700,000. 
(3) For ammunition procurement, Navy and Marine Corps, 
$681,957,000. 
(4) For other procurement, Navy, $293,018,000. 
(5) For procurement, Marine Corps, $1,060,268,000. 
SEC. 1505. AIR FORCE PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for procurement accounts of the Air Force in amounts as 
follows: 
(1) For aircraft procurement, $780,441,000. 
(2) For ammunition procurement, $256,819,000. 
(3) For missile procurement, $36,625,000. 
(4) For other procurement, $2,321,549,000. 
SEC. 1506. MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED VEHICLE FUND. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund in 
the amount of $6,056,000,000.
H. R. 2647—376 
SEC. 1507. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for the procurement account for Defense-wide activities in 
the amount of $489,980,000. 
SEC. 1508. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $57,962,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $90,180,000. 
(3) For the Air Force, $29,286,000. 
(4) For Defense-wide activities, $115,826,000. 
SEC. 1509. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for the use of the Armed Forces for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $52,166,761,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $6,219,583,000. 
(3) For the Marine Corps, $3,701,600,000. 
(4) For the Air Force, $10,026,868,000. 
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $7,583,400,000. 
(6) For the Army Reserve, $204,326,000. 
(7) For the Navy Reserve, $68,059,000. 
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $86,667,000. 
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $125,925,000. 
(10) For the Army National Guard, $321,646,000. 
(11) For the Air National Guard, $289,862,000. 
(12) 
For 
the 
Afghanistan 
Security 
Forces 
Fund, 
$7,462,769,000. 
SEC. 1510. LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN AFGHANISTAN 
SECURITY FORCES FUND. 
Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund in section 1509(12) 
shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) 
through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428). 
SEC. 1511. LIMITATIONS ON IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND. 
Funds made available to the Department of Defense for the 
Iraq Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2010 shall be subject 
to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 
1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 426). 
SEC. 1512. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 to the Department of Defense for military personnel accounts 
in the total amount of $14,146,341,000. 
SEC. 1513. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2010 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds in the amount of $396,915,000.
H. R. 2647—377 
SEC. 1514. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2010 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Defense Health Program in the amount of 
$1,256,675,000 for operation and maintenance. 
SEC. 1515. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2010 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 
Defense-wide in the amount of $356,603,000. 
SEC. 1516. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2010 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense in the amount of $8,876,000. 
SEC. 1517. RELATION TO FUNDING TABLES. 
(a) AMOUNTS FOR PROCUREMENT.—The amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by sections 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, and 
1507 shall be available, in accordance with the requirements of 
section 4001, for projects, programs, and activities, and in the 
amounts, specified in the funding table in section 4102. 
(b) AMOUNTS FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUA-
TION.—The amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1508 
shall be available, in accordance with the requirements of section 
4001, for projects, programs, and activities, and in the amounts, 
specified in the funding table in section 4202. 
(c) AMOUNTS FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 1509 shall be available, 
in accordance with the requirements of section 4001, for projects, 
programs, and activities, and in the amounts, specified in the 
funding table in section 4302. 
(d) OTHER AMOUNTS.—The amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by sections 1513, 1514, 1515, and 1516 shall be available, 
in accordance with the requirements of section 4001, for projects, 
programs, and activities, and in the amounts, specified in the 
funding table in section 4402. 
SEC. 1518. CONTINUATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF UNITED 
STATES FUNDS FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES PROJECTS IN 
IRAQ. 
Section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4651) shall apply to funds authorized to be appropriated 
by this title. 
SEC. 1519. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 
by this Act. 
SEC. 1520. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 
Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest,
H. R. 2647—418 
should have known, that a subordinate was about to commit 
such acts or had done so and who failed to take the necessary 
and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish 
the perpetrators thereof, 
is a principal. 
‘‘§ 950r. Accessory after the fact 
‘‘Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that an 
offense punishable by this chapter has been committed, receives, 
comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent 
his apprehension, trial, or punishment shall be punished as a 
military commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘§ 950s. Conviction of lesser offenses 
‘‘An accused may be found guilty of an offense necessarily 
included in the offense charged or of an attempt to commit either 
the offense charged or an attempt to commit either the offense 
charged or an offense necessarily included therein. 
‘‘§ 950t. Crimes triable by military commission 
‘‘The following offenses shall be triable by military commission 
under this chapter at any time without limitation: 
‘‘(1) MURDER OF PROTECTED PERSONS.—Any person subject 
to this chapter who intentionally kills one or more protected 
persons shall be punished by death or such other punishment 
as a military commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(2) ATTACKING
CIVILIANS.—Any person subject to this 
chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a civilian 
population as such, or individual civilians not taking active 
part in hostilities, shall be punished, if death results to one 
or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment 
as a military commission under this chapter may direct, and, 
if death does not result to any of the victims, by such punish-
ment, other than death, as a military commission under this 
chapter may direct. 
‘‘(3) ATTACKING CIVILIAN OBJECTS.—Any person subject to 
this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a 
civilian object that is not a military objective shall be punished 
as a military commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(4) ATTACKING PROTECTED PROPERTY.—Any person subject 
to this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon 
protected property shall be punished as a military commission 
under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(5) PILLAGING.—Any person subject to this chapter who 
intentionally and in the absence of military necessity appro-
priates or seizes property for private or personal use, without 
the consent of a person with authority to permit such appropria-
tion or seizure, shall be punished as a military commission 
under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(6) DENYING QUARTER.—Any person subject to this chapter 
who, with effective command or control over subordinate 
groups, declares, orders, or otherwise indicates to those groups 
that there shall be no survivors or surrender accepted, with 
the intent to threaten an adversary or to conduct hostilities 
such that there would be no survivors or surrender accepted, 
shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter 
may direct.
H. R. 2647—419 
‘‘(7) TAKING HOSTAGES.—Any person subject to this chapter 
who, having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons, 
threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person 
or persons with the intent of compelling any nation, person 
other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or refrain 
from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety 
or release of such person or persons, shall be punished, if 
death results to one or more of the victims, by death or such 
other punishment as a military commission under this chapter 
may direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims, 
by such punishment, other than death, as a military commission 
under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(8) EMPLOYING POISON OR SIMILAR WEAPONS.—Any person 
subject to this chapter who intentionally, as a method of war-
fare, employs a substance or weapon that releases a substance 
that causes death or serious and lasting damage to health 
in the ordinary course of events, through its asphyxiating, 
bacteriological, or toxic properties, shall be punished, if death 
results to one or more of the victims, by death or such other 
punishment as a military commission under this chapter may 
direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims, 
by such punishment, other than death, as a military commission 
under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(9) USING PROTECTED PERSONS AS A SHIELD.—Any person 
subject to this chapter who positions, or otherwise takes advan-
tage of, a protected person with the intent to shield a military 
objective from attack. or to shield, favor, or impede military 
operations, shall be punished, if death results to one or more 
of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a military 
commission under this chapter may direct, and, if death does 
not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other 
than death, as a military commission under this chapter may 
direct. 
‘‘(10) USING PROTECTED PROPERTY AS A SHIELD.—Any per-
son subject to this chapter who positions, or otherwise takes 
advantage of the location of, protected property with the intent 
to shield a military objective from attack, or to shield, favor, 
or impede military operations, shall be punished as a military 
commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(11) TORTURE.— 
‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who 
commits an act specifically intended to inflict severe phys-
ical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suf-
fering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person 
within his custody or physical control for the purpose of 
obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimi-
dation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination 
of any kind, shall be punished, if death results to one 
or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment 
as a military commission under this chapter may direct, 
and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by 
such punishment, other than death, as a military commis-
sion under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(B) SEVERE MENTAL PAIN OR SUFFERING DEFINED.— 
In this paragraph, the term ‘severe mental pain or suf-
fering’ has the meaning given that term in section 2340(2) 
of title 18.
H. R. 2647—420 
‘‘(12) CRUEL OR INHUMAN TREATMENT.—Any person subject 
to this chapter who subjects another person in their custody 
or under their physical control, regardless of nationality or 
physical location, to cruel or inhuman treatment that con-
stitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 of the Geneva 
Conventions shall be punished, if death results to the victim, 
by death or such other punishment as a military commission 
under this chapter may direct, and, if death does not result 
to the victim, by such punishment, other than death, as a 
military commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(13) INTENTIONALLY CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY INJURY.— 
‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who 
intentionally causes serious bodily injury to one or more 
persons, including privileged belligerents, in violation of 
the law of war shall be punished, if death results to one 
or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment 
as a military commission under this chapter may direct, 
and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by 
such punishment, other than death, as a military commis-
sion under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(B) SERIOUS BODILY INJURY DEFINED.—In this para-
graph, the term ‘serious bodily injury’ means bodily injury 
which involves— 
‘‘(i) a substantial risk of death; 
‘‘(ii) extreme physical pain; 
‘‘(iii) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or 
‘‘(iv) protracted loss or impairment of the function 
of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty. 
‘‘(14) MUTILATING OR MAIMING.—Any person subject to this 
chapter who intentionally injures one or more protected persons 
by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation of the 
person or persons, or by permanently disabling any member, 
limb, or organ of the body of the person or persons, without 
any legitimate medical or dental purpose, shall be punished, 
if death results to one or more of the victims, by death or 
such other punishment as a military commission under this 
chapter may direct, and, if death does not result to any of 
the victims, by such punishment, other than death, as a military 
commission under this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(15) MURDER IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF WAR.—Any 
person subject to this chapter who intentionally kills one or 
more persons, including privileged belligerents, in violation of 
the law of war shall be punished by death or such other 
punishment as a military commission under this chapter may 
direct. 
‘‘(16) DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW 
OF WAR.—Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally 
destroys property belonging to another person in violation of 
the law of war shall punished as a military commission under 
this chapter may direct. 
‘‘(17) USING TREACHERY OR PERFIDY.—Any person subject 
to this chapter who, after inviting the confidence or belief 
of one or more persons that they were entitled to, or obliged 
to accord, protection under the law of war, intentionally makes 
use of that confidence or belief in killing, injuring, or capturing 
such person or persons shall be punished, if death results
H. R. 2647—441 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $219,300,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2009, for 
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount 
of $4,516,073,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(a), $2,752,500,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(b), $303,000,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$25,000,000. 
(4) For host nation support and architectural and 
engineering services and construction design under section 2807 
of title 10, United States Code, $200,519,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $241,236,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United 
States Code), $523,418,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 4 of a brigade complex 
at Fort Lewis, Washington, authorized by section 2101(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2445), as 
amended by section 20814 of the Continuing Appropriations 
Resolution, 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–289), as added 
by section 2 of the Revised Continuing Resolution, 2007 (Public 
Law 110–5; 121 Stat 41) $102,000,000. 
(7) For the construction of increment 3 of the United States 
Southern Command Headquarters at Miami Doral, Florida, 
authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 504), $55,400,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 3 of the brigade 
complex operations support facility at Vicenza, Italy, authorized 
by section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 
122 Stat. 505), $23,500,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 3 of the brigade 
complex barracks and community support facility at Vicenza, 
Italy, authorized by section 2101(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 505), $22,500,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of a barracks 
and dining complex at Fort Carson, Colorado, authorized by 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
H. R. 2647—442 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4659), $60,000,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of a barracks 
and dining complex at Fort Stewart, Georgia, authorized by 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4659), $80,000,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 2 of the family 
housing replacement construction at Wiesbaden Air Base, Ger-
many, authorized by section 2102(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4663), $10,000,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 2 of the family 
housing replacement construction at Wiesbaden Air Base, Ger-
many, authorized by section 2102(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4663), $11,000,000. 
(14) For the construction of increment 2 of the family 
housing replacement construction at Wiesbaden Air Base, Ger-
many, authorized by section 2102(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4663), $11,000,000. 
(15) For the construction of increment 1 of an Aviation 
Task Force Complex Phase 1 at Fort Wainwright, Alaska, 
authorized by section 2101(a), $95,000,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 
(2) $95,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for an aviation task force complex, Phase 
I at Fort Wainwright, Alaska). 
(3) $25,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 505) for construction of a brigade complex oper-
ations support facility at Vicenza, Italy. 
(4) $26,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 505) for construction of a brigade complex oper-
ations support facility at Vicenza, Italy. 
(c) LIMITATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF TROOP TRAINEE BAR-
RACKS PROJECTS.—The Secretary of the Army may not enter into 
an award of a project for any troop trainee barracks authorized 
under section 2101(a) until the Secretary submits to the congres-
sional defense committees a report that includes the following: 
(1) Within the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
under subsection (a), a list of the proposed projects. 
(2) A Military Construction Data Sheet for each project. 
(3) A certification that the projects can be awarded in 
the year for which the appropriation of funds is made. 
(4) A certification that the projects are listed in the current 
Future Years Defense Program for the Army.
H. R. 2647—453 
TRICARE Management Activity 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ....................
Elmendorf Air Force Base .............
$25,017,000 
Fort Richardson .............................
$3,518,000 
Colorado .................
Fort Carson ....................................
$31,900,000 
Georgia ..................
Fort Benning ..................................
$17,200,000 
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Field
$22,200,000 
Kentucky ...............
Fort Campbell ................................
$8,600,000 
Maryland ...............
Fort Detrick ....................................
$29,807,000 
Missouri .................
Fort Leonard Wood ........................
$5,570,000 
North Carolina ......
Fort Bragg ......................................
$57,658,000 
Oklahoma ..............
Fort Sill ..........................................
$10,554,000 
Texas ......................
Lackland Air Force Base ...............
$101,928,000 
Fort Bliss ........................................
$990,600,000 
Washington ...........
Fort Lewis ......................................
$15,636,000 
Washington Headquarters Services 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Virginia ..................
Pentagon Reservation ....................
$27,672,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2404(a)(2), the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following tables: 
Defense Education Activity 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium ......................
Brussels .....................................................
$38,124,000 
Germany .....................
Boeblingen .................................................
$50,000,000 
Kaiserslautern ..........................................
$93,545,000 
Wiesbaden Air Base .................................
$5,379,000 
United Kingdom .........
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ....................
$4,509,000 
Defense Intelligence Agency 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Korea ..........................
K–16 Airfield .............................................
$5,050,000 
Defense Logistics Agency 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Cuba .......................
Naval Air Station, Guantanamo 
Bay.
$12,500,000 
Greece ....................
Souda Bay ......................................
$24,000,000 
Guam .....................
Naval Air Station, Agana ..............
$4,900,000
H. R. 2647—454 
Defense Logistics Agency—Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Korea .....................
Osan Air Base ................................
$28,000,000 
United Kingdom ....
Royal Air Force Mildenhall ...........
$4,700,000 
National Security Agency 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
United Kingdom ....
Royal Air Force Menwith Hill Sta-
tion.
$37,588,000 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium .................
NATO Headquarters .....................
$41,400,000 
TRICARE Management Activity 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam .....................
Naval Activities, Guam .................
$446,450,000 
United Kingdom ....
Royal Air Force Alconbury ............
$14,227,000 
SEC. 2402. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2404(a)(7), the Secretary of Defense may 
construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installation, in the number of 
units, and in the amount set forth in the following table: 
Defense Logistics Agency: Family Housing 
State 
Location 
Units 
Amount 
Pennsylvania
Cumberland Depot .........
6 ................
$2,859,000 
SEC. 2403. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2404(a)(6), the Secretary of Defense may 
carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, in the amount of $123,013,000. 
SEC. 2404. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2009, for 
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military 
departments) in the total amount of $3,177,496,000, as follows:
H. R. 2647—455 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(a), $1,048,783,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(b), $188,762,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $33,025,000. 
(4) For contingency construction projects of the Secretary 
of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, 
$10,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$121,442,000. 
(6) For energy conservation projects under chapter 173 
of title 10, United States Code, $123,013,000. 
(7) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $49,214,000. 
(B) For construction and acquisition of military family 
housing and facilities, $2,859,000. 
(C) For credits to the Department of Defense Family 
Housing Improvement Fund under section 2883 of title 
10, United States Code, and the Homeowners Assistance 
Fund established under section 1013 of the Demonstration 
Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 
U.S.C. 3374), $302,600,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 4 of the Army Medical 
Research Institute of Infectious Diseases Stage 1 at Fort 
Detrick, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2007 (division 
B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $108,000,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of replacement 
fuel storage facilities at Point Loma Annex, California, author-
ized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act of Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 521), as amended by section 2406 of this Act, 
$92,300,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 3 of a special oper-
ations facility at Dam Neck, Virginia, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal 
Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 521), 
$15,967,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of the United 
States Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense 
replacement facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417 122 Stat. 4689), $111,400,000. 
(12) For the construction of fuel storage tanks and pipeline 
replacement at Souda Bay, Greece, authorized by section 
2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal 
Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4691), 
as amended by section 2405 of this Act, $24,000,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 2 of a National 
Security Agency data center at Camp Williams, Utah, author-
ized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by the
H. R. 2647—461 
Army Reserve: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Wisconsin ....................
Fort McCoy ...............................................
$28,550,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2606(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve 
location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth 
in the following table: 
Army Reserve: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Puerto Rico ...............................
Caguas .............................................................
$12,400,000 
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using the amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2606(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for unspecified installa-
tions or locations in the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Army Reserve 
Location 
Location or Installation 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified ............
Unspecified Worldwide Locations ....................
$30,000,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2606(a)(3), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve 
and Marine Corps Reserve locations, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................................
Luke Air Force Base .........................................
$10,986,000 
California ..................................
Alameda .............................................................
$5,960,000 
Illinois .......................................
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant .......................
$7,957,000 
South Carolina .........................
Goose Creek .......................................................
$4,240,000 
Texas .........................................
San Antonio .......................................................
$2,210,000 
Fort Worth Naval Air Station Joint Reserve 
Base.
$6,170,000 
Virginia .....................................
Oceana Naval Air Station ................................
$30,400,000 
(b) UNSPECIFIED
WORLDWIDE.—Using the amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2606(a)(3), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for unspecified installa-
tions or locations in the amounts set forth in the following table:
H. R. 2647—472 
SEC. 2802. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF FACILITY REPAIR 
PROJECTS 
CARRIED 
OUT 
USING 
OPERATION 
AND 
MAINTENANCE FUNDS. 
Section 2811(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following 
new paragraphs: 
‘‘(2) if the current estimate of the cost of the repair project 
exceeds 75 percent of the estimated cost of a military construc-
tion project to replace the facility, an explanation of the reasons 
why replacement of the facility is not in the best interest 
of the Government; and 
‘‘(3) a description of the elements of military construction, 
including the elements specified in section 2802(b) of this title, 
incorporated into the repair project.’’. 
SEC. 2803. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR SCOPE OF WORK VARI-
ATIONS. 
Section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘(1) Except as provided in subsection (c)’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘may be reduced by not more than 
25 percent from the amount approved for that project, 
construction, improvement, or acquisition by Congress.’’ 
and inserting ‘‘may be reduced by not more than 25 percent 
from the amount specified for that project, construction, 
improvement, or acquisition in the justification data pro-
vided to Congress as part of the request for authorization 
of the project, construction, improvement, or acquisition.’’; 
and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) The scope of work for a military construction project or 
for the construction, improvement, and acquisition of a military 
family housing project may not be increased above the amount 
specified for that project, construction, improvement, or acquisition 
in the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request 
for authorization of the project, construction, improvement, or 
acquisition.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘limitation on scope reduc-
tion in subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘limitation on scope reduc-
tion in subsection (b)(1)’’. 
SEC. 2804. MODIFICATION OF CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY AT MILITARY 
INSTALLATIONS. 
(a) LIMITED PURPOSES FOR WHICH REAL PROPERTY MAY BE 
CONVEYED.—Section 2869 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘agrees, in exchange for the real 
property—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘to carry out 
a military construction project or land acquisition’’ and 
inserting ‘‘agrees, in exchange for the real property, 
to carry out a land acquisition’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a period; and 
(iii) by striking subparagraph (B); and
H. R. 2647—595 
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPER-
ATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Program 
Element 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
180 
0304311F 
SELECTED ACTIVITIES .........................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
181 
0304348F 
ADVANCED GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE (AGI) ............
[ ] 
[ ] 
188 
0305124F 
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ..................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
189 
0305127F 
FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ..........
[ ] 
[ ] 
191 
0305142F 
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND INTEGRATION .................
[ ] 
[ ] 
196 
0305172F 
COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS ..........................
[ ] 
[ ] 
206 
0305219F 
MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .......................................................
1,400 
1,400 
999 
9999999 
OTHER PROGRAMS ................................................................
17,111 
17,111 
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOP-
MENT, AIR FORCE ............................................................
29,286 
29,286 
TOTAL, RDT&E AIR FORCE ..............................................
29,286 
29,286 
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE 
RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 
159 
0301555G 
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ......................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
160 
0301556G 
SPECIAL PROGRAM ...............................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
165 
0305193G 
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPER-
ATIONS (IO).
[ ] 
[ ] 
181 
0301301L 
GENERAL DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM ...........
[ ] 
[ ] 
182 
0301318BB 
HUMINT (CONTROLLED) ......................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
183 
0301371G 
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE—CCP .................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
184 
0301372L 
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE—GDIP ...............................
[ ] 
[ ] 
185 
0301555BZ 
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ......................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
186 
0301556BZ 
SPECIAL PROGRAM ...............................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
198 
0303150K 
GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................
2,750 
2,750 
204 
0304345BQ 
NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM 
(NGP).
[ ] 
[ ] 
207 
0305103G 
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
211 
0305127L 
FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ..........
[ ] 
[ ] 
212 
0305146BZ 
DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVI-
TIES.
[ ] 
[ ] 
213 
0305146L 
DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVI-
TIES.
[ ] 
[ ] 
214 
0305183L 
DEFENSE HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (HUMINT) ACTIVI-
TIES.
[ ] 
[ ] 
218 
0305202G 
DRAGON U–2 ...........................................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
219 
0305206G 
AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ........................
[ ] 
[ ] 
221 
0305208BB 
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 
[ ] 
[ ] 
222 
0305208BQ 
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 
[ ] 
[ ] 
223 
0305208G 
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 
[ ] 
[ ] 
225 
0305208L 
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 
[ ] 
[ ] 
226 
0305219BB 
MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .......................................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
227 
0305229G 
REAL-TIME ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT (RT10) ....
[ ] 
[ ] 
231 
0305880L 
COMBATANT 
COMMAND 
INTELLIGENCE 
OPER-
ATIONS.
[ ] 
[ ] 
232 
0305883L 
HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET (HDBT) INTEL 
SUPPORT.
[ ] 
[ ] 
233 
0305884L 
INTELLIGENCE PLANNING AND REVIEW ACTIVITIES 
[ ] 
[ ] 
236 
0307141G 
INFORMATION OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY INTE-
GRATION & TOOL DEV.
[ ] 
[ ] 
237 
0307207G 
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) .......................................
[ ] 
[ ] 
999 
9999999 
OTHER PROGRAMS ................................................................
113,076 
113,076 
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOP-
MENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ...................................................
115,826 
115,826 
Total, RDT&E Defense-Wide ...............................................
115,826 
115,826 
TOTAL RDT&E .......................................................................
310,254 
293,254
H. R. 2647—596 
TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND 
MAINTENANCE 
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Operation and Maintenance, Army 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
LAND FORCES 
010 
MANEUVER UNITS ...........................................................
1,020,490 
1,020,490 
020 
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ...................................
105,178 
105,178 
030 
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ........................................
708,038 
708,038 
040 
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ...............................................
718,233 
718,233 
050 
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................
1,379,529 
1,315,129 
Budget realignment of combat training center trans-
portation funding in support of helicopter training ..
[–64,400 ] 
060 
AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................
850,750 
773,350 
Budget realignment in support of helicopter training ..
[–77,400 ] 
LAND FORCES READINESS 
070 
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............
2,088,233 
2,088,233 
080 
LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .........................
633,704 
633,704 
090 
LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................
692,601 
695,601 
Texas Defense Manufacturing Supply Chain Initiative 
[3,000 ] 
LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 
100 
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................
7,586,455 
7,588,155 
Fort Bliss Data Center ....................................................
[1,700 ] 
110 
FACILITIES 
SUSTAINMENT, 
RESTORATION, 
& 
MODERNIZATION ..........................................................
2,221,446 
2,221,446 
120 
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .....................
333,119 
333,119 
130 
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS ...
123,163 
123,163 
140 
ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ...............................................
150 
COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 
160 
RESET ..................................................................................
170 
COMBATANT 
COMMANDERS 
ANCILLARY 
MIS-
SIONS ...............................................................................
460,159 
460,159 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES .......................
18,921,098 
18,783,998 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 02: MOBILIZATION 
MOBILITY OPERATIONS 
180 
STRATEGIC MOBILITY ....................................................
228,376 
228,376 
190 
ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ................................
98,129 
98,129 
200 
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ......................................
5,705 
5,705 
TOTAL, BA 02: MOBILIZATION ...................................
332,210 
332,210 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 03: TRAINING AND RE-
CRUITING 
ACCESSION TRAINING 
210 
OFFICER ACQUISITION ..................................................
125,615 
125,615 
220 
RECRUIT TRAINING .........................................................
87,488 
87,488 
230 
ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ....................................
59,302 
59,302
H. R. 2647—602 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
SPACE OPERATIONS 
120 
LAUNCH FACILITIES .......................................................
356,367 
356,367 
130 
SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ...........................................
725,646 
725,646 
COCOM 
140 
COMBATANT 
COMMANDERS 
DIRECT 
MISSION 
SUPPORT .........................................................................
608,796 
608,796 
150 
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS ...
216,073 
216,073 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES .......................
19,607,592 
19,609,332 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 02: MOBILIZATION 
MOBILITY OPERATIONS 
160 
AIRLIFT OPERATIONS .....................................................
2,932,080 
2,934,080 
Warner Robins Air Logistics Center Strategic Airlift 
Aircraft Availability Improvements ............................
[2,000 ] 
170 
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ..................................
211,858 
211,858 
180 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................
332,226 
332,226 
190 
FACILITIES 
SUSTAINMENT, 
RESTORATION 
& 
MODERNIZATION ..........................................................
362,954 
362,954 
200 
BASE SUPPORT .................................................................
657,830 
657,830 
TOTAL, BA 02: MOBILIZATION ...................................
4,496,948 
4,498,948 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 03: TRAINING AND RE-
CRUITING 
ACCESSION TRAINING 
210 
OFFICER ACQUISITION ..................................................
120,870 
120,870 
220 
RECRUIT TRAINING .........................................................
18,135 
18,135 
230 
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ........
88,414 
88,414 
240 
FACILITIES 
SUSTAINMENT, 
RESTORATION 
& 
MODERNIZATION ..........................................................
372,788 
372,788 
250 
BASE SUPPORT .................................................................
685,029 
685,029 
BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 
260 
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ....................................
514,048 
514,048 
270 
FLIGHT TRAINING ...........................................................
833,005 
833,005 
280 
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..........
215,676 
215,676 
290 
TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................
118,877 
118,877 
300 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................
576 
576 
RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDU-
CATION 
320 
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING .................................
152,983 
152,983 
330 
EXAMINING .......................................................................
5,584 
5,584 
340 
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ................
188,198 
188,198 
350 
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ......................
174,151 
174,151 
360 
JUNIOR ROTC ....................................................................
67,549 
67,549 
TOTAL, BA 03: TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........
3,555,883 
3,555,883 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 04: ADMINISTRATION & 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 
370 
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ................................................
1,055,672 
1,055,672 
380 
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ..............................
735,036 
735,036
H. R. 2647—603 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
400 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................
15,411 
15,411 
410 
FACILITIES 
SUSTAINMENT, 
RESTORATION 
& 
MODERNIZATION ..........................................................
359,562 
359,562 
420 
BASE SUPPORT .................................................................
1,410,097 
1,410,097 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
430 
ADMINISTRATION ............................................................
646,080 
643,330 
Servicewide administration .............................................
[–10,000 ] 
Transfer from O&M, DW BTA for DIMHRS .................
[7,250 ] 
440 
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................
581,951 
581,951 
450 
OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .............................
1,062,803 
1,062,803 
460 
CIVIL AIR PATROL ...........................................................
22,433 
22,433 
SECURITY PROGRAMS 
470 
SECURITY PROGRAMS ....................................................
1,148,704 
1,148,704 
SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS 
480 
INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ...........................................
49,987 
49,987 
TOTAL, 
BA 
04: 
ADMINISTRATION 
& 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .....................................
7,087,736 
7,084,986 
USAF Civilian Underexecution ......................................
–50,000 
Unobligated Balances Estimate ......................................
–172,000 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ..........
34,748,159 
34,527,149 
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 
DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 
010 
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ...............................................
457,169 
457,169 
020 
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ..............................
3,611,492 
3,612,992 
Special Operations Forces Modular Glove System .......
[1,500 ] 
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: .....................................
4,068,661 
4,070,161 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUIT-
ING 
DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 
030 
DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY ........................
115,497 
115,497 
RECRUITING 
AND 
OTHER 
TRAINING 
EDU-
CATION 
040 
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ..............................
103,408 
103,408 
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: .....................................
218,905 
218,905 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE 
ACTIVITIES 
DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 
050 
AMERICAN FORCES INFORMATION SERVICE ..........
060 
CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS .........................................
132,231 
152,231 
National Guard Youth Challenge Program ...................
[5,000 ]
H. R. 2647—610 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
AIR OPERATIONS 
010 
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ................
1,138,398 
1,138,398 
020 
FLEET AIR TRAINING ..........................................................
2,640 
2,640 
030 
AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERV-
ICES ......................................................................................
1,212 
1,212 
040 
AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ......................
26,815 
26,815 
050 
AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ......................................................
44,532 
44,532 
060 
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................
158,559 
158,559 
SHIP OPERATIONS 
080 
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ......................
651,209 
651,209 
090 
SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ....................
22,489 
22,489 
100 
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................
1,001,037 
1,001,037 
Transfer to base ....................................................................
COMBAT OPERATIONS/SUPPORT 
120 
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................
20,704 
20,704 
150 
WARFARE TACTICS ..............................................................
15,918 
15,918 
160 
OPERATIONAL 
METEOROLOGY 
AND 
OCEANOG-
RAPHY ..................................................................................
16,889 
16,889 
170 
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...............................................
1,891,799 
1,891,799 
180 
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .............................................
306 
306 
200 
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .......
6,929 
6,929 
210 
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUP-
PORT .....................................................................................
7,344 
7,344 
WEAPONS SUPPORT 
240 
IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ..................
68,759 
68,759 
250 
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .................................................
82,496 
82,496 
260 
OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT .............................
16,902 
16,902 
BASE SUPPORT 
280 
SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZA-
TION ......................................................................................
7,629 
7,629 
290 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..............................................
338,604 
338,604 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
5,521,170 
5,521,170 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 02: MOBILIZATION 
READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES 
300 
SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ...............................
27,290 
27,290 
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 
330 
FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM .............................................
4,336 
4,336 
350 
COAST GUARD SUPPORT ....................................................
245,039 
245,039 
TOTAL, BA 02: MOBILIZATION ........................................
276,665 
276,665 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 03: TRAINING AND RECRUIT-
ING 
BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 
390 
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................
97,995 
97,995 
420 
TRAINING SUPPORT .............................................................
5,463 
5,463
H. R. 2647—611 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
TOTAL, BA 03: TRAINING AND RECRUITING ............
103,458 
103,458 
BUDGET 
ACTIVITY 
04: 
ADMINISTRATION 
& 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 
470 
ADMINISTRATION .................................................................
3,899 
3,899 
480 
EXTERNAL RELATIONS .......................................................
463 
463 
500 
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGE-
MENT ....................................................................................
563 
563 
510 
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ..........................................
2,525 
2,525 
520 
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................
23,557 
23,557 
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUP-
PORT 
540 
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................
223,890 
223,890 
570 
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..............
642 
642 
INVESTIGATIONS AND SECURITY PROGRAMS 
610 
NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ....................................
37,452 
37,452 
OTHER PROGRAMS 
999 
OTHER PROGRAMS ...............................................................
25,299 
25,299 
TOTAL, BA 04: ADMINISTRATION & SERVICEWIDE 
ACTIVITIES ........................................................................
318,290 
318,290 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Navy .......................
6,219,583 
6,219,583 
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 
010 
OPERATIONAL FORCES .......................................................
2,048,844 
2,048,844 
020 
FIELD LOGISTICS .................................................................
486,014 
486,014 
030 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................
554,000 
554,000 
USMC PREPOSITIONING 
060 
NORWAY PREPOSITIONING ...............................................
950 
950 
BASE SUPPORT 
090 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..............................................
121,700 
121,700 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
3,211,508 
3,211,508 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 03: TRAINING AND RECRUIT-
ING 
BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 
120 
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................
6,303 
6,303 
140 
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..............
923 
923 
150 
TRAINING SUPPORT .............................................................
205,625 
205,625 
TOTAL, BA 03: TRAINING AND RECRUITING ............
212,851 
212,851
H. R. 2647—612 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
BUDGET 
ACTIVITY 
04: 
ADMINISTRATION 
& 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 
210 
SPECIAL SUPPORT ...............................................................
2,576 
2,576 
220 
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................
269,415 
269,415 
230 
ADMINISTRATION .................................................................
5,250 
5,250 
TOTAL, BA 04: ADMINISTRATION & SERVICEWIDE 
ACTIVITIES ........................................................................
277,241 
277,241 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps .......
3,701,600 
3,701,600 
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
AIR OPERATIONS 
010 
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...............................................
1,582,431 
1,582,431 
020 
COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ..................................
1,460,018 
1,460,018 
030 
AIR 
OPERATIONS 
TRAINING 
(OJT, 
MAINTAIN 
SKILLS) ................................................................................
109,255 
109,255 
050 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................
304,540 
304,540 
060 
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MOD-
ERNIZATION .......................................................................
121,881 
121,881 
070 
BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................
1,394,809 
1,394,809 
COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS 
080 
GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ................................
130,885 
130,885 
090 
OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ............................
407,554 
407,554 
SPACE OPERATIONS 
130 
SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ................................................
38,677 
38,677 
COCOM 
140 
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUP-
PORT .....................................................................................
157,000 
157,000 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
5,707,050 
5,707,050 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 02: MOBILIZATION 
MOBILITY OPERATIONS 
160 
AIRLIFT OPERATIONS .........................................................
3,171,148 
3,171,148 
170 
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ......................................
169,659 
169,659 
180 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................
167,070 
167,070 
190 
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MOD-
ERNIZATION .......................................................................
942 
942 
200 
BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................
45,998 
45,998 
TOTAL, BA 02: MOBILIZATION ........................................
3,554,817 
3,554,817 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 03: TRAINING AND RECRUIT-
ING 
ACCESSION TRAINING
H. R. 2647—613 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
240 
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MOD-
ERNIZATION .......................................................................
1,019 
1,019 
250 
BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................
19,361 
19,361 
BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 
260 
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................
48,442 
48,442 
270 
FLIGHT TRAINING ................................................................
291 
291 
280 
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..............
1,500 
1,500 
290 
TRAINING SUPPORT .............................................................
1,427 
1,427 
TOTAL, BA 03: TRAINING AND RECRUITING ............
72,040 
72,040 
BUDGET 
ACTIVITY 
04: 
ADMINISTRATION 
& 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 
370 
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ....................................................
328,009 
328,009 
420 
BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................
35,322 
35,322 
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
430 
ADMINISTRATION .................................................................
9,000 
9,000 
440 
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................
178,470 
178,470 
SECURITY PROGRAMS 
470 
SECURITY PROGRAMS .........................................................
142,160 
142,160 
TOTAL, BA 04: ADMINISTRATION & SERVICEWIDE 
ACTIVITIES ........................................................................
692,961 
692,961 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ...............
10,026,868 
10,026,868 
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 
DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 
010 
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ....................................................
25,000 
25,000 
020 
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ...................................
2,519,935 
2,519,935 
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: .........................................
2,544,935 
2,544,935 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE AC-
TIVITIES 
DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 
100 
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ............................
13,908 
13,908 
130 
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ...............
245,117 
245,117 
150 
DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES ..............................................
115,000 
115,000 
170 
DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ...............................................
13,364 
13,364 
200 
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ......................
2,018 
2,018 
210 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION AGENCY .....
553,600 
553,600 
220 
DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ............
63,130 
63,130 
230 
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ..............
1,950,000 
1,950,000 
270 
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ...................
79,047 
79,047 
OTHER PROGRAMS
H. R. 2647—614 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
999 
OTHER PROGRAMS ...............................................................
1,998,181 
1,998,181 
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: .........................................
5,033,365 
5,033,365 
Army end strength budget amendment ..............................
5,100 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide .......
7,578,300 
7,583,400 
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
LAND FORCES 
030 
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .............................................
86,881 
86,881 
050 
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...........................
40,675 
40,675 
LAND FORCES READINESS 
070 
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................
21,270 
21,270 
080 
LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .............................
17,500 
17,500 
LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 
100 
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................
38,000 
38,000 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
204,326 
204,326 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve ......
204,326 
204,326 
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
AIR OPERATIONS 
010 
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ................
26,673 
26,673 
020 
INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .......................................
400 
400 
040 
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................
3,600 
3,600 
SHIP OPERATIONS 
060 
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ......................
7,416 
7,416 
080 
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................
8,917 
8,917 
COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 
090 
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................
3,147 
3,147 
100 
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...............................................
13,428 
13,428 
BASE SUPPORT 
140 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..............................................
4,478 
4,478 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
68,059 
68,059 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve .......
68,059 
68,059 
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
H. R. 2647—615 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 
010 
OPERATING FORCES ............................................................
77,849 
77,849 
BASE SUPPORT 
050 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..............................................
8,818 
8,818 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
86,667 
86,667 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Re-
serve .....................................................................................
86,667 
86,667 
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
AIR OPERATIONS 
010 
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...............................................
3,618 
3,618 
020 
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS .....................................
7,276 
7,276 
030 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................
114,531 
114,531 
050 
BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................
500 
500 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
125,925 
125,925 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve 
125,925 
125,925 
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
LAND FORCES 
010 
MANEUVER UNITS ...............................................................
89,666 
89,666 
020 
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .......................................
1,196 
1,196 
030 
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .............................................
18,360 
18,360 
040 
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ...................................................
380 
380 
060 
AVIATION ASSETS ................................................................
59,357 
59,357 
LAND FORCES READINESS 
070 
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................
94,458 
94,458 
LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 
100 
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................
22,536 
22,536 
120 
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .........................
35,693 
35,693 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
321,646 
321,646 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Army National 
Guard ...................................................................................
321,646 
321,646
H. R. 2647—616 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard 
BUDGET ACTIVITY 01: OPERATING FORCES 
AIR OPERATIONS 
010 
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS .....................................................
103,259 
103,259 
020 
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS .....................................
51,300 
51,300 
030 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................
135,303 
135,303 
TOTAL, BA 01: OPERATING FORCES ............................
289,862 
289,862 
Total Operation and Maintenance, Air National 
Guard ...................................................................................
289,862 
289,862 
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund 
010 
INFRASTRUCTURE ...............................................................
868,320 
868,320 
020 
EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .............................
1,615,192 
1,615,192 
030 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ............................................
272,998 
272,998 
040 
SUSTAINMENT .......................................................................
1,945,887 
1,945,887 
060 
INFRASTRUCTURE ...............................................................
605,584 
605,584 
070 
EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .............................
279,186 
279,186 
080 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ............................................
648,217 
648,217 
090 
SUSTAINMENT .......................................................................
1,219,966 
1,219,966 
120 
SUSTAINMENT .......................................................................
5,919 
5,919 
130 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ............................................
1,500 
1,500 
TOTAL, Afghanistan Security Forces Fund ..................
7,462,769 
7,462,769 
Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund 
INFRASTRUCTURE ...............................................................
41,970 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–41,970] 
EQUIPMENT/TRANSPORTATION .......................................
397,907 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–397,907] 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ............................................
67,953 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–67,953] 
INFRASTRUCTURE ...............................................................
73,000 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–73,000] 
EQUIPMENT/TRANSPORTATION .......................................
107,000 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–107,000] 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ............................................
8,170 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–8,170] 
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ...........................................
4,000 
Realigned from Defense to International Affairs ...............
[–4,000] 
TOTAL, 
Pakistan 
Counterinsurgency 
Capability 
Fund .....................................................................................
700,000 
MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 
080 
IRAQ FREEDOM FUND .........................................................
115,300 
Program reduction ................................................................
[–115,300]
H. R. 2647—617 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
TOTAL, MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ..........
115,300 
TOTAL 
TITLE 
III—OPERATION 
AND 
MAINTE-
NANCE .................................................................................
89,071,566 
88,257,466 
TITLE XLIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 4401. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program Title 
FY 2010 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 
DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 
DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS ....................................
141,388 
141,388 
DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY ............................................
1,313,616 
1,313,616 
Total, Defense Working Capital Funds ..................................
1,455,004 
1,455,004 
NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 
Strategic Ship Acquisition 
T–AKE ..............................................................................................
940,115 
940,115 
MLP ..................................................................................................
120,047 
120,047 
OUTFITTING AND POST DELIVERY .........................................
29,740 
29,740 
DoD Mobilization Assets 
NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT VESSEL ..................................
1,438 
1,438 
LMSR MAINTENANCE .................................................................
96,363 
96,363 
DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ........................................
64,167 
64,167 
T–AH MAINTENANCE ..................................................................
37,627 
37,627 
Strategic Sealift Support 
STRATEGIC SEALIFT SUPPORT ................................................
4,794 
4,794 
Sealift Research and Development 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................
72,983 
72,983 
Ready Reserve Force 
READY RESERVE FORCE ............................................................
275,484 
275,484 
Total, National Defense Sealift Fund ......................................
1,642,758 
1,642,758 
DEFENSE COALITION SUPPORT FUND 
DEFENSE COALITION SUPPORT FUND ..................................
22,000 
Total Revolving and Management Funds ..............................
3,119,762 
3,097,762 
MILITARY PROGRAMS 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM—O&M ......................................
26,967,919 
27,094,849 
TRICARE Continuation Pending MEDICARE Eligibility ...
[4,000] 
Transitional Dental Care (S712) ............................................
[11,000] 
Pre-mobilization health care coverage for Reservists and 
their families .........................................................................
[92,000] 
Madigan Medical Center Trauma Assistance Program .......
[2,500] 
Fort Drum Regional Health Planning Organization ............
[430] 
Extend Dental Coverage to Dependent Survivors ................
[2,000] 
Chiropractic Clinical Trials ....................................................
[5,000] 
TRICARE Coverage for Gray-Area Retirees .........................
[10,000] 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM—R&D .......................................
613,102 
616,102