I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 110 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit human cloning. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 6, 2009 
Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit human 
cloning. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Cloning Prohi-
bition Act of 2009’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds that— 
(1) some individuals have announced that they 
will attempt to clone human beings using the tech-
nique known as somatic cell nuclear transfer already 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
00:58 Jan 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H110.IH
H110
wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
used with limited success in sheep and other ani-
mals; 
(2) nearly all scientists agree that such at-
tempts pose a massive risk of producing children 
who are stillborn, unhealthy, or severely disabled, 
and considered opinion is virtually unanimous that 
such attempts are therefore grossly irresponsible and 
unethical; 
(3) efforts to create human beings by cloning 
mark a new and decisive step toward turning human 
reproduction into a manufacturing process in which 
children are made in laboratories to preordained 
specifications and, potentially, in multiple copies; 
(4) because it is an asexual form of reproduc-
tion, cloning confounds the meaning of ‘‘father’’ and 
‘‘mother’’ and confuses the identity and kinship rela-
tions of any cloned child, and thus threatens to 
weaken existing notions regarding who bears which 
parental duties and responsibilities for children; 
(5) because cloning requires no personal in-
volvement by the person whose genetic material is 
used, cloning could easily be used to reproduce living 
or deceased persons without their consent; 
(6) creating cloned live-born human children 
(sometimes called ‘‘reproductive cloning’’) nec-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
00:58 Jan 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H110.IH
H110
wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
essarily begins by creating cloned human embryos, a 
process which some also propose as a way to create 
embryos for research or as sources of cells and tis-
sues for possible treatment of other humans; 
(7) the prospect of creating new human life 
solely to be exploited and destroyed in this way has 
been condemned on moral grounds by many, includ-
ing supporters of a right to abortion, as displaying 
a profound disrespect for life, and recent scientific 
advances with adult stem cells indicate that there 
are fruitful and morally unproblematic alternatives 
to this approach; 
(8) in order to be effective, a ban on human 
cloning must stop the cloning process at the begin-
ning because— 
(A) cloning would take place within the 
privacy of a doctor-patient relationship; 
(B) the transfer of embryos to begin a 
pregnancy is a simple procedure; and 
(C) any Government effort to prevent the 
transfer of an existing embryo, or to prevent 
birth once the transfer has occurred, would 
raise substantial moral, legal, and practical 
issues, so that it will be nearly impossible to 
prevent attempts at ‘‘reproductive cloning’’ once 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
00:58 Jan 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H110.IH
H110
wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
cloned human embryos are available in the lab-
oratory; 
(9) the scientifically and medically useful prac-
tices of cloning of DNA fragments, known as molec-
ular cloning, the duplication of somatic cells (or 
stem cells) in tissue culture, known as cell cloning, 
and whole-organism or embryo cloning of nonhuman 
animals are appropriate uses of medical technology; 
(10) in the preamble to the 1998 Additional 
Protocol on the Prohibition of Cloning Human 
Beings the Council of Europe agreed that ‘‘the 
instrumentalisation of human beings through the de-
liberate creation of genetically identical human 
beings is contrary to human dignity and thus con-
stitutes a misuse of biology and medicine’’; 
(11) collaborative efforts to perform human 
cloning are conducted in ways that affect interstate 
and even international commerce, and the legal sta-
tus of cloning will have a great impact on how bio-
technology companies direct their resources for re-
search and development; 
(12) at least 23 countries have banned all 
human cloning, including Canada, France, and Ger-
many; 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
00:58 Jan 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H110.IH
H110
wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS