datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3892
To clarify treatment of certain claims and defenses against an insured deposi-
tory institution under receivership by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 24, 1996
Mr. TORKILDSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Banking and Financial Services
A BILL
To clarify treatment of certain claims and defenses against
an insured depository institution under receivership by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘D’Oench Duhme Re-
form Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) in D’Oench Duhme & Co. v. Federal De-
posit Insurance Corporation, 315 U.S. 447 (1942),
the Supreme Court determined that secret side
agreements that were not recorded in the records of
an insured depository institution should not be en-
forceable against Federal banking agencies when
those agencies acquired assets following the failure
of the institution;
(2) the Supreme Court based its holding (here-
after in this section referred to as the ‘‘D’Oench
doctrine’’) on its power to develop Federal common
law;
(3) in 1950, the Congress supplemented the
D’Oench doctrine by amending section 13(e) of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act to invalidate agree-
ments relating to assets acquired by Federal bank-
ing agencies that were not recorded in official depos-
itory institution records;
(4) Federal and State courts have expanded the
scope of the D’Oench doctrine and section 13(e) of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act by interpreting
them to bar tort claims based on oral representa-
tions, claims that do not relate to assets acquired by
Federal banking agencies, and numerous other
HR 3893 IH
United States from an OECD country, except as provided
in subsection (c).
‘‘(c) SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS.—(1) The prohibitions
contained in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to
baled waste paper, scrap textiles, or waste glass, if all of
the following conditions are met with respect to such
waste:
‘‘(A) The waste is exported or imported for the
purposes of recycling.
‘‘(B) The waste is separated from the waste
stream.
‘‘(C) The waste does not contain any sub-
stances whose storage, treatment, or disposal within
the United States is regulated under subtitle C.
‘‘(2) The prohibition contained in subsection (b) shall
not apply to any scrap metal that—
‘‘(A) meets all of the conditions listed in sub-
paragraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1);
‘‘(B) is not, and does not contain, a sludge; and
‘‘(C) meets either of the following conditions:
‘‘(i) The waste is not within, and does not
contain a waste within, a category of waste list-
ed in Annex I or Annex II of the Basel Conven-
tion on the Control of Transboundary Move-
ments of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal.
•HJ 59 IH 
United States’’ under the Clean Water Act (80 Fed. Reg. 
37053), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:44 Jul 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HJ59.IH
HJ59
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IA 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 5 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 
the effect of treaties, Executive orders, and agreements with other na-
tions or groups of nations. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 6, 2015 
Mr. CULBERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States regarding the effect of treaties, Executive orders, 
and agreements with other nations or groups of nations. 
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 
of the United States of America in Congress assembled
(two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol-
lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con-
stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 
intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 
States within seven years after the date of its submission 
for ratification: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:03 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ5.IH
HJ5
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HJ 5 IH 
‘‘ARTICLE — 
‘‘No treaty, Executive order, or any agreement with 
any nation or group of nations or any of the provisions 
of such agreements, shall be construed to diminish any 
of the rights or privileges guaranteed to citizens of the 
United States under the Constitution of the United States, 
and Federal law.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:03 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HJ5.IH
HJ5
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3893
To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit the international export
and import of certain solid waste.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 24, 1996
Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Commerce
A BILL
To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit the
international export and import of certain solid waste.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Waste Export and Im-
port Prohibition Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress makes the following
findings:
(1) Proposals to export solid waste from the
United States to foreign countries are increasing. In
HR 3893 IH
numerous instances exported waste has contami-
nated the environment, adversely affected public
health, and contributed to foreign policy liabilities
for the United States.
(2) Exports of solid waste are being undertaken
to avoid the community opposition and higher treat-
ment and disposal expenses that are associated with
waste disposal, treatment, and recycling in the
United States.
(3) Increasingly, hazardous waste exports are
justified by the agreeable term ‘‘recycling’’, even
though the result of the export is a transfer of pollu-
tion to areas of the world with little capability to
manage that pollution.
(4) Continued exports of solid waste serve as a
disincentive to implementation of existing domestic
policy, which recognizes reuse and waste reduction
as the best methods of solid waste management.
(5) Imports of waste from foreign countries
strain diminishing domestic waste disposal capacity,
threaten public health, and contaminate the environ-
ment.
(6) The international Basel Convention on the
Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous
Wastes and their Disposal recognizes the right and
HR 3893 IH
indeed encourages waste export and import prohibi-
tions. In the first meeting of the Parties, a decision
was made requesting industrialized countries to pro-
hibit transboundary movements of hazardous wastes
and other wastes for disposal to developing countries
and further requesting developing countries to pro-
hibit the import of hazardous wastes from industri-
alized countries.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to prohibit
the export of solid waste from the United States and the
import of solid waste from foreign countries.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOLID
WASTE.
(a) PROHIBITION.—Subtitle A of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 1009. EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOLID WASTE.
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION
ON EXPORTS
TO NON-OECD
COUNTRIES.—Effective July 1, 1994, no person may ex-
port any solid waste from the United States to a non-
OECD country, except as provided in subsection (c).
‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS TO AND IMPORTS
FROM OECD COUNTRIES.—Effective January 1, 1999, no
person may export any solid waste from the United States
to an OECD country, or import any solid waste into the
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘DEM-
ONSTRATION’’;
(2) in subsections (a) and (i)(1) by striking
‘‘demonstration’’ each place it appears;
(3) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and’’
after the semicolon at the end;
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; and’’
at the end and inserting a period; and
(C) by striking paragraph (3); and
(4) by striking subsection (k).
Æ
V
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3894
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 24, 1996
Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Margarito Domantay.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES.
The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Petty
Officer Margarito Domantay, United States Navy (re-
tired), of Tampa, Florida, the amount of retired pay that
he would have received for the period beginning on June
8, 1979, and ending on March 12, 1985, had he been ini-
tially retired in the grade of E–5, second class (rather
than the grade of E–4, third class, in which he was mis-
takenly retired due to administrative error).
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.
It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per-
cent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid
to, or received by, any agent or attorney for any service
rendered in connection with the claim described in such
section. Any person who violates this section shall be
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in
the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.
Æ
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 61 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 
employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the 
Veterans Administration from being taken into account 
for purposes of determining the employers to which the 
employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. 
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
•HJ 61 EH 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Hire More 
Heroes Act of 2015’’. 
SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER 
TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINISTRA-
TION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETER-
MINING EMPLOYERS TO WHICH THE EM-
PLOYER MANDATE APPLIES UNDER PATIENT 
PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE 
UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS-
TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 
whether an employer is an applicable large em-
ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 
individual shall not be taken into account as an 
employee for such month if such individual has 
medical coverage for such month under— 
‘‘(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, including coverage under the 
TRICARE program, or 
‘‘(ii) under a health care program 
under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 
States Code, as determined by the Sec-
•HJ 61 EH 
retary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services and the Secretary.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning after De-
cember 31, 2013. 
SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS; STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO 
(PAYGO) SCORECARDS. 
The budgetary effects of this joint resolution shall not 
be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursu-
ant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act 
of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)). 
Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2015. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 61 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
exempt employees with health coverage under 
TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from 
being taken into account for purposes of deter-
mining the employers to which the employer 
mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act.
IA 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 61 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt employees with 
health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from 
being taken into account for purposes of determining the employers 
to which the employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 23, 2015 
Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which 
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to 
the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined 
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 
employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the 
Veterans Administration from being taken into account 
for purposes of determining the employers to which the 
employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. 
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:03 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ61.IH
HJ61
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HJ 61 IH 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Hire More 
Heroes Act of 2015’’. 
SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER 
TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINISTRA-
TION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETER-
MINING EMPLOYERS TO WHICH THE EM-
PLOYER MANDATE APPLIES UNDER PATIENT 
PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE 
UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS-
TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 
whether an employer is an applicable large em-
ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 
individual shall not be taken into account as an 
employee for such month if such individual has 
medical coverage for such month under— 
‘‘(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, including coverage under the 
TRICARE program, or 
‘‘(ii) under a health care program 
under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 
States Code, as determined by the Sec-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:03 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ61.IH
HJ61
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HJ 61 IH 
retary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services and the Secretary.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning after De-
cember 31, 2013. 
SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS; STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO 
(PAYGO) SCORECARDS. 
The budgetary effects of this joint resolution shall not 
be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursu-
ant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act 
of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)). 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:03 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HJ61.IH
HJ61
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IA 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 62 
To authorize the use of the Armed Forces of the United States against 
Iran if Iran commits a serious violation of its commitments or obligations 
under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 29, 2015 
Mr. LARSON of Connecticut introduced the following joint resolution; which 
was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
To authorize the use of the Armed Forces of the United 
States against Iran if Iran commits a serious violation 
of its commitments or obligations under the Joint Com-
prehensive Plan of Action, and for other purposes. 
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the President should be commended for the 
unwavering commitment to ensure that Iran never 
acquires a nuclear weapon and the willingness to ex-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:20 Jul 30, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ62.IH
HJ62
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3896
To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of dogs or
other appropriate animals at major airports for the purpose of detecting
plastic explosives and other devices which may be used in airport piracy
and which cannot be detected by metal detectors.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 26, 1996
Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use
of dogs or other appropriate animals at major airports
for the purpose of detecting plastic explosives and other
devices which may be used in airport piracy and which
cannot be detected by metal detectors.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aviation Security Im-
provement Act of 1996’’.
SEC. 2. SCREENING BY DOGS.
Section 44903(b) of title 49, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end of the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(3) USE OF DOGS IN SCREENING.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The law enforcement
presence and capability required under para-
graph (1) shall include a requirement that the
operator of each major airport use dogs or
other appropriate animals in screening pas-
sengers and cargo for the purpose of detecting
plastic explosives and other devices or materials
which may be used in aircraft piracy and which
cannot be detected by metal detectors.
‘‘(B) MAJOR AIRPORT DEFINED.—In this
paragraph, the term ‘major airport’ means an
airport that is one of the largest 50 airports in
the United States, as determined by the num-
ber of passenger enplanements in calendar year
1995.’’.
SEC. 3. EXPLOSIVE DETECTION K–9 TEAMS.
Section 44913(b) of title 49, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘(b) EXPLOSIVE DETECTION K–9 TEAMS.—
‘‘(1) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make
grants for expenses of training and evaluation of
dogs for the explosive detection K–9 team training
program for the purpose of detecting explosives at
airports and aboard aircraft. Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of the Aviation
Security Improvement Act of 1996, the Secretary
shall extend such program to the largest 50 airports
in the United States, as determined by the number
of passenger enplanements in calendar year 1995.
‘‘(2) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated from the Trust Fund for carrying out
paragraph (1) such sums as may be necessary for
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996.
Such funds shall remain available until expended.’’.
Æ
IIA 
Calendar No. 170 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 61 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 28, 2015 
Received; read the first time 
JULY 29, 2015 
Read the second time and placed on the calendar 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 
employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the 
Veterans Administration from being taken into account 
for purposes of determining the employers to which the 
employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. 
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Hire More 
Heroes Act of 2015’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:11 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ61.PCS
HJ61
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HJ 61 PCS 
SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER 
TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINISTRA-
TION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETER-
MINING EMPLOYERS TO WHICH THE EM-
PLOYER MANDATE APPLIES UNDER PATIENT 
PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE 
UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS-
TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 
whether an employer is an applicable large em-
ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 
individual shall not be taken into account as an 
employee for such month if such individual has 
medical coverage for such month under— 
‘‘(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, including coverage under the 
TRICARE program, or 
‘‘(ii) under a health care program 
under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 
States Code, as determined by the Sec-
retary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services and the Secretary.’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:11 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ61.PCS
HJ61
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
resulted in an agreement, originally executed in
1992 and thereafter amended in 1993 and 1994,
among the National Park Service, Nunamiut Cor-
poration, the City of Anaktuvuk Pass, and Arctic
Slope Regional Corporation. Full effectuation of this
agreement, as amended, by its terms requires ratifi-
cation by the Congress.
(b) RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT.—
(1) RATIFICATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The terms, conditions,
procedures, covenants, reservations and other
provisions set forth in the document entitled
‘‘Donation, Exchange of Lands and Interests in
Lands and Wilderness Redesignation Agree-
ment Among Arctic Slope Regional Corpora-
tion, Nunamiut Corporation, City of Anaktuvuk
Pass and the United States of America’’ (here-
inafter referred to in this section as ‘‘the Agree-
ment’’), executed by the parties on December
17, 1992, as amended, are hereby incorporated
in this title, are ratified and confirmed, and set
forth the obligations and commitments of the
United States, Arctic Slope Regional Corpora-
tion, Nunamiut Corporation and the City of
Anaktuvuk Pass, as a matter of Federal law.
HJ 61 PCS 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning after De-
cember 31, 2013. 
SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS; STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO 
(PAYGO) SCORECARDS. 
The budgetary effects of this joint resolution shall not 
be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursu-
ant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act 
of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)). 
Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2015. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:11 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HJ61.PCS
HJ61
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 170 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. J. RES. 61 
JOINT RESOLUTION 
Amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
exempt employees with health coverage under 
TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from 
being taken into account for purposes of deter-
mining the employers to which the employer 
mandate applies under the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act. 
JULY 29, 2015 
Read the second time and placed on the calendar 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:11 Jul 29, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\HJ61.PCS
HJ61
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS