datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2086
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 to limit the portion of the Superfund expended
for administration, oversight, support, studies, design, investigations,
monitoring, assessment, and evaluation, and enforcement activities.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 1997
Mr. GILLMOR (for himself, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr.
BILBRAY, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.
STENHOLM, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, and Mr.
LEWIS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently deter-
mined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to limit the portion
of the Superfund expended for administration, oversight,
support, studies, design, investigations, monitoring, as-
sessment, and evaluation, and enforcement activities.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIMIT ON CERTAIN EXPENDITURES.
Section 111 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 is
amended by inserting the following new subsection after
subsection (g):
‘‘(h) LIMTATION
ON CERTAIN EXPENDITURES.—
From the total sums made available under subsection (a)
of this section for any fiscal year, the aggregate amount
expended in such fiscal year for administration, oversight,
support, studies, design, investigations, monitoring, as-
sessment, and evaluation, and enforcement activities shall
not exceed the following percentages of such total:
‘‘(1) Fiscal years 1998, 1999, and 2000: 25
percent.
‘‘(2) Fiscal year 2001 and thereafter: 20 per-
cent.
The Administrator shall report to the Congress, within 90
days after the enactment of this subsection, any regulatory
or statutory relief that will be required to operate under
the funding limitations specified in this subsection.’’.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4219 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 10, 2015 
Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment 
(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 
Kazakhstan. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) Kazakhstan allows its citizens the right and 
opportunity to emigrate, free of any heavy tax on 
emigration or on the visas or other documents re-
quired for emigration and free of any tax, levy, fine, 
fee, or other charge on any citizens as a consequence 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:07 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4219.IH
H4219
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
of the desire of those citizens to emigrate to the 
country of their choice. 
(2) Kazakhstan has been found to be in full 
compliance with the freedom of emigration require-
ments under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 
U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) since 1994. 
(3) Kazakhstan has received normal trade rela-
tions treatment since concluding a bilateral trade 
agreement with the United States that entered into 
force in 1992. 
(4) On July 27, 2015, the Ministerial Con-
ference of the World Trade Organization invited 
Kazakhstan to accede to the World Trade Organiza-
tion. 
SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF 
THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO THE PRODUCTS 
OF KAZAKHSTAN. 
(a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN-
SION
OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith-
standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may— 
(1) determine that such title should no longer 
apply to Kazakhstan; and 
(2) after making a determination under para-
graph (1) with respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:07 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4219.IH
H4219
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal 
trade relations treatment) to the products of 
Kazakhstan. 
(b) TERMINATION
OF APPLICABILITY
OF TITLE 
IV.—On and after the date on which the President ex-
tends nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of 
Kazakhstan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) shall cease 
to apply to Kazakhstan. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:07 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4219.IH
H4219
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2087
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 to require that polluters are responsible for the
cleanup of hazardous substances, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 1997
Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Commit-
tee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to require that
polluters are responsible for the cleanup of hazardous
substances, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Polluter Pays Act of
1997.’’
HR 2087 IH
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF CERCLA.
(a) LIABILITY OF POLLUTERS.—Section 107(a) of
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act of 1980 is amended by striking out
so much of such subsection as precedes subparagraph (A)
and inserting:
‘‘(a) LIABILITY
OF POLLUTERS.—Notwithstanding
any other provision or rule of law, and subject only to the
defenses set forth in subsection (b), any person who causes
the release, or threatened release, of a hazardous sub-
stance at any facility shall be liable for—’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) SECTION 101.—Section 101 of such Act is
amended by striking ‘‘107(a)(1)’’ in subparagraph
(C) of paragraph (35) and inserting ‘‘107(a)’’.
(2) SECTION 108.—Section 108(a)(1) of such
Act is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) of’’.
(3) SECTION 122.—Section 122(j)(2) is amend-
ed 
by 
striking 
‘‘107(a)(4)(C)’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘107(a)(3)’’.
(4) SECTION 124.—Section 124(b) of such Act
is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), (3), or
(4) of’’.
(5) SECTION 107.—Section 107 of such Act is
amended 
by 
redesignating 
subparagraphs 
(A)
HR 2087 IH
through (D) of subsection (A) as paragraphs (1)
through (4) respectively.
(6) SECTION 106.—Section 106(a) of such Act
is amended by inserting ‘‘against any person or per-
sons who cause the release, or threatened release, of
a hazardous substance at any facility’’ after the
words ‘‘grant such relief’’ and after the words ‘‘issu-
ing such orders’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on
the date of enactment and shall apply to any case in which
there has been no final decree or final settlement that is
not subject to appeal. For purposes of this subsection, the
term ‘‘final decree’’ means a decree from which no appeal
may be taken or from which no appeal has been taken
within the time allowed for the taking of such appeals
under the laws applicable to such appeals, or a decree from
which timely appeal has been taken and such appeal has
been finally decided under the laws applicable to such ap-
peals.
Æ
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2089
To authorize leases on the Cabazon Indian Reservation for terms not to
exceed 99 years.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 1997
Mr. KILDEE (for himself and Mr. BONO) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To authorize leases on the Cabazon Indian Reservation for
terms not to exceed 99 years.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF 99-YEAR LEASES.
The first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to au-
thorize the leasing of restricted Indian lands for public,
religious, educational, residential, business, and other pur-
poses requiring the grant of long-term leases’’, approved
August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended by insert-
ing ‘‘the Cabazon Indian Reservation,’’ after ‘‘the Soboba
Indian Reservation,’’.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Section 1 shall apply to any lease entered into or re-
newed on or after January 1, 1997.
Æ
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 208
To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the sanctity of religious
communications.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 7, 1997
Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the
sanctity of religious communications.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Communica-
tion Sanctity Act of 1997’’.
SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SANCTITY OF RELIGIOUS COMMU-
NICATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing:
HR 208 IH
‘‘§ 249. Protection of sanctity of religious communica-
tions
‘‘(a) Whoever, under color of governmental authority,
surreptitiously listens to or records in any manner, any
communication that is privileged, because of its religious
character, under Federal law or under the non-Federal
law of the place where such communication takes place,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
5 years, or both.
‘‘(b) Any person aggrieved by a violation of this sec-
tion consisting of the recording of a communication may,
in a civil action, obtain the prompt destruction of that re-
cording and any copies or transcripts made from that re-
cording.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of chapter 13 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
item:
‘‘249. Protection of sanctity of religious communications.’’.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4221 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to restore National SMART 
Grants for a certain number of award years. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 10, 2015 
Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to restore 
National SMART Grants for a certain number of award 
years. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SMART Grant Reau-
thorization Act of 2015’’. 
SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF SMART GRANTS. 
Section 401A of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1070a–1) is amended— 
(1) by amending the section heading to read as 
follows: ‘‘NATIONAL SMART GRANTS’’; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:13 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4221.IH
H4221
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(C) documentaries to allow this issue to be
presented to the American public to raise their
awareness.
(10) An independent, volunteer advisory com-
mittee should be established comprised of represent-
atives of Italian American organizations, historians,
and other interested individuals to assist in the com-
pilation, research, and dissemination of information
concerning the treatment of Italian Americans.
(11) After completion of the report required by
this Act, financial support should be provided for the
education of the American public through the pro-
duction of a documentary film suited for public
broadcast.
SEC. 3. REPORT.
The Inspector General of the Department of Justice
shall conduct a comprehensive review of the treatment by
the United States Government of Italian Americans dur-
ing World War II, and within 12 months of the date of
enactment of this Act shall submit to the Congress a re-
port that documents the findings of such review. The re-
port shall cover the period between September 1, 1939,
and December 31, 1945, and shall include the following:
(1) The names of all Italian Americans who
were taken into custody in the initial roundup fol-
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking paragraph (1); and 
(B) by striking ‘‘this section’’ and all that 
follows through ‘‘for the third’’ and inserting 
‘‘this section for the third’’; 
(3) in subsection (c)(3)— 
(A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and 
(B); 
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) 
through (E) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), 
respectively; 
(C) in subparagraph (A)(i), as so redesig-
nated— 
(i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub-
clause (I) and inserting ‘‘and’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘major in’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘the physical’’ and in-
serting ‘‘major in the physical’’; and 
(iii) by striking subclause (II); and 
(D) in subparagraph (C)(i), as so redesig-
nated— 
(i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub-
clause (I) and inserting ‘‘and’’; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:13 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4221.IH
H4221
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(ii) by striking ‘‘major in’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘the physical’’ and in-
serting ‘‘major in the physical’’; and 
(iii) by striking subclause (II); 
(4) in subsection (d)(1)(A)— 
(A) by striking clauses (i) and (ii); 
(B) by redesignating clauses (iii) and (iv) 
as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; 
(C) in clause (i), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘subparagraph (C) or (D)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘subparagraph (A) or (B)’’; and 
(D) in clause (ii), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘(E)’’ and inserting ‘‘(C)’’; 
(5) by amending subsection (e)(1) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OF 
FUNDS.—There are authorized to be appropriated, 
and there are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the De-
partment of Education to carry out this section 
$400,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and each of the 
5 succeeding fiscal years.’’; 
(6) by striking subsection (f); 
(7) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub-
section (f); and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:13 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4221.IH
H4221
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(8) in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘2010–2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2020–2021’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:13 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4221.IH
H4221
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2091
To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to add Elbert
County and Hart County, Georgia, to the Appalachian region.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 1997
Mr. LINDER (for himself and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of
1965 to add Elbert County and Hart County, Georgia,
to the Appalachian region.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION.
Section 403 of the Appalachian Regional Develop-
ment Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App.) is amended in the
undesignated paragraph relating to Georgia—
(1) by inserting ‘‘Elbert,’’ after ‘‘Douglas,’’;
and
(2) by inserting ‘‘Hart,’’ after ‘‘Haralson,’’.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4223 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reinstate the authority 
of the Secretary of Education to make Federal Direct Stafford Loans 
to graduate and professional students. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 10, 2015 
Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself, Ms. LEE, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. 
LOWENTHAL, Mr. HONDA, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. TITUS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, 
Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. CAPPS, 
Mrs. NAPOLITANO, and Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reinstate 
the authority of the Secretary of Education to make 
Federal Direct Stafford Loans to graduate and profes-
sional students. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Stu-
dents by Terminating Graduate Rates that Add to Debt 
Act’’ or the ‘‘POST GRAD Act’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:14 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4223.IH
H4223
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE FED-
ERAL DIRECT STAFFORD LOANS TO GRAD-
UATE AND PROFESSIONAL STUDENTS. 
Section 455(a)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(a)(3)) is amended— 
(1) in the paragraph heading, by inserting 
‘‘TEMPORARY’’ before ‘‘TERMINATION’’; and 
(2) in subparagraph (A), in the matter pre-
ceding clause (i), by inserting ‘‘, and ending on or 
before June 30, 2016’’ after ‘‘2012’’. 
SEC. 3. INAPPLICABILITY OF RULEMAKING REQUIRE-
MENTS. 
Sections 482(c) and 492 of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1089(c); 1098a) shall not apply to 
the regulations under this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:14 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4223.IH
H4223
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4224 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sidney Olsin 
Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 10, 2015 
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To designate the Federal building and United States court-
house located at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, 
Georgia, as the ‘‘Sidney Olsin Smith, Jr. Federal Build-
ing and United States Courthouse’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SIDNEY OLSIN SMITH, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 
AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 
States courthouse located at 121 Spring Street SE in 
Gainesville, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:14 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4224.IH
H4224
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘Sidney Olsin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the Federal building and United States court-
house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
a reference to the ‘‘Sidney Olsin Smith, Jr. Federal Build-
ing and United States Courthouse’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:14 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4224.IH
H4224
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
tended by section 2(a)(1)(P) of Public Law 112–121 (126 
Stat. 346; 28 U.S.C. 152 note), is converted hereby to 
the permanent office of bankruptcy judge and is rep-
resented in the amendment made by section 3(10) of this 
Act. 
SEC. 3. PERMANENT OFFICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE AU-
THORIZED. 
To reflect the conversion of the temporary office of 
bankruptcy judge to the permanent office of bankruptcy 
judge made by the operation of section 2, and to authorize 
the appointment of additional bankruptcy judges, section 
152(a)(2) of title 28 of the United States Code is amend-
ed— 
(1) in the item relating to the district of Dela-
ware by striking ‘‘1’’ and inserting ‘‘8’’, 
(2) in the item relating to the middle district of 
Florida by striking ‘‘8’’ and inserting ‘‘10’’, 
(3) in the item relating to the southern district 
of Florida by striking ‘‘5’’ and inserting ‘‘7’’, 
(4) in the item relating to the district of Mary-
land by striking ‘‘4’’ and inserting ‘‘6’’, 
(5) in the item relating to the eastern district 
of Michigan by striking ‘‘4’’ and inserting ‘‘7’’, 
(6) in the item relating to the district of Ne-
vada by striking ‘‘3’’ and inserting ‘‘4’’, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:14 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4225.IH
H4225
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2093
To temporarily waive the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for D.C.
Health Cooperative.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 1997
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Commerce
A BILL
To temporarily waive the Medicaid enrollment composition
rule for D.C. Health Cooperative.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT
RULE FOR D.C. HEALTH COOPERATIVE.
The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(m)(2)(A)(ii)) is
waived with respect to the D.C. Health Cooperative, Inc.,
of the District of Columbia, or any successor to such orga-
nization, for contract periods beginning on or after Octo-
ber 1, 1997, and ending before October 1, 2001.
Æ