329 
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE 
ORGANIZATION 
AND 
MANAGEMENT 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense 
Management 
SEC. 901. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
AND MARINE CORPS. 
(a) REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
CORPS.— 
(1) REDESIGNATION
OF
MILITARY
DEPART-
MENT.—The military department designated as the 
Department of the Navy is redesignated as the De-
partment of the Navy and Marine Corps. 
(2) REDESIGNATION OF SECRETARY AND OTHER 
STATUTORY OFFICES.— 
(A) SECRETARY.—The position of the Sec-
retary of the Navy is redesignated as the Sec-
retary of the Navy and Marine Corps. 
(B) OTHER STATUTORY OFFICES.—The po-
sitions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the 
four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the 
General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00329
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
330 
Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secre-
taries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the 
General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps, respectively. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10, UNITED 
STATES CODE.— 
(1) DEFINITION OF ‘‘MILITARY DEPARTMENT’’.— 
Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(8) The term ‘military department’ means the 
Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air 
Force.’’. 
(2) ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENT.—The text 
of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as fol-
lows: ‘‘The Department of the Navy and Marine 
Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of 
the Navy and Marine Corps.’’. 
(3) 
POSITION
OF
SECRETARY.—Section 
5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘There 
is a Secretary of the Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘There is 
a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps’’. 
(4) CHAPTER HEADINGS.— 
(A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00330
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
331 
‘‘CHAPTER 503—DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS’’. 
(B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘CHAPTER 507—COMPOSITION OF THE DE-
PARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
CORPS’’. 
(5) OTHER AMENDMENTS.— 
(A) Title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘Department of the Navy’’ and 
‘‘Secretary of the Navy’’ each place they appear 
other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), 
(3), and (4) (including in section headings, sub-
section captions, tables of chapters, and tables of 
sections) and inserting ‘‘Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’, respectively, in each case 
with the matter inserted to be in the same type-
face and typestyle as the matter stricken. 
(B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 
5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are 
amended by striking ‘‘Assistant Secretaries of the 
Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretaries of 
the Navy and Marine Corps’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00331
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
332 
(ii) The heading of section 5016 of such 
title, and the item relating to such section in the 
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 
of such title, are each amended by inserting ‘‘and 
Marine Corps’’ after ‘‘of the Navy’’, with the 
matter inserted in each case to be in the same 
typeface and typestyle as the matter amended. 
(c) OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW AND OTHER REF-
ERENCES.— 
(1) TITLE 37, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 37, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Depart-
ment of the Navy’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy’’ each 
place they appear and inserting ‘‘Department of the 
Navy and Marine Corps’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’, respectively. 
(2) OTHER REFERENCES.—Any reference in any 
law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States 
Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States, to the Department of the 
Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the De-
partment of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such 
reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) 
shall be considered to be a reference to that office as 
redesignated by that section. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00332
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
333 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend-
ments made by this section shall take effect on the first day 
of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 902. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION 
PLAN FOR DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 
ARCHITECTURE. 
Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘defense busi-
ness enterprise architecture’’ and inserting ‘‘target de-
fense business systems computing environment de-
scribed in subsection (d)(3)’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘existing as of September 
30, 2011 (known as ‘legacy systems’) that will 
not be part of the defense business enterprise ar-
chitecture’’ and inserting ‘‘that will be phased 
out of the defense business systems computing en-
vironment within three years after review and 
certification as ‘legacy systems’ by the invest-
ment management process established under sub-
section (g)’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘that provides for reducing 
the use of those legacy systems in phases’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00333
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
334 
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘legacy sys-
tems (referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a 
part of the target defense business systems computing 
environment described in subsection (d)(3)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘existing systems that are part of the target 
defense business systems computing environment’’. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORT-
ING POLICY. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) the Department of Defense depends on na-
tional security space programs to support, among 
other critical capabilities— 
(A) communications; 
(B) missile warning; 
(C) position, navigation, and timing; 
(D) intelligence, surveillance, and recon-
naissance; and 
(E) environmental monitoring; and 
(2) foreign threats to national security space sys-
tems are increasing. 
(b) NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN INTERFERENCE OF NA-
TIONAL SECURITY SPACE.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00334
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
336 
any related capability outage and the mission impact 
of such outage; and 
‘‘(3) any other information the Secretary con-
siders relevant. 
‘‘(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ 
means— 
‘‘(1) the congressional defense committees; and 
‘‘(2) with respect to a notice or notification re-
lated to an attempt by a foreign entity to disrupt, de-
grade, or destroy a United States national security 
space capability that is intelligence-related, the Per-
manent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House 
of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate.’’. 
(c) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 
sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by 
adding at the end the following item: 
‘‘2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space.’’. 
SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PRO-
TECTION. 
(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
enter into an arrangement with the National Research 
Council to— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00336
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
337 
(1) in response to the near-term and long-term 
threats to the national security space systems of the 
United States, conduct a review of— 
(A) the range of strategic options available 
to address such threats, in terms of deterring 
hostile actions, defeating hostile actions, or sur-
viving hostile actions until such actions con-
clude; 
(B) strategies and plans to counter such 
threats, 
including 
resilience, 
reconstitution, 
disaggregation, and other appropriate concepts; 
and 
(C) existing and planned architectures, 
warfighter requirements, technology development, 
systems, workforce, or other factors related to ad-
dressing such threats; and 
(2) identify recommend courses of action to ad-
dress such threats, including potential barriers or 
limiting factors in implementing such courses of ac-
tion. 
(b) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Re-
search Council shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00337
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
338 
Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a re-
port containing the results of the review conducted 
pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a) 
and the recommended courses of action identified pur-
suant to such arrangement. 
(2) FORM.—The report required under para-
graph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
may include a classified annex. 
(c) SPACE PROTECTION STRATEGY.—Section 911(f)(1) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking ‘‘includ-
ing each of the matters required by subsection (c).’’ and in-
serting the following: ‘‘including— 
‘‘(A) each of the matters required by sub-
section (c); and 
‘‘(B) a description of how the Department 
of Defense and the intelligence community plan 
to provide necessary national security capabili-
ties, through alternative space, airborne, or 
ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, de-
nies access to, or destroys United States national 
security space capabilities.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00338
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
339 
SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY. 
(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of 
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in con-
sultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense, shall establish a strategy to enable the 
multi-year procurement of commercial satellite services. 
(b) BASIS.—The strategy required under subsection (a) 
shall include and be based on— 
(1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to 
acquiring satellite services through multi-year acqui-
sition approaches; 
(2) an analysis of the risks associated with such 
acquisition approaches; 
(3) an identification of methods to address plan-
ning, programming, budgeting, and execution chal-
lenges to such approaches, including methods to ad-
dress potential termination liability or cancellation 
costs generally associated with multi-year contracts; 
(4) an identification of any changes needed in 
the requirements development and approval processes 
of the Department of Defense to facilitate effective and 
efficient implementation of such strategy, including 
an identification of any consolidation of requirements 
for such services across the Department that may 
achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00339
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
340 
(5) an identification of any necessary changes to 
policies, procedures, regulations, or statutes. 
(c) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in con-
sultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees the strategy required under subsection (a), in-
cluding the elements required under subsection (b). 
SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the con-
gressional defense committees a report on the space control 
mission of the Department of Defense. Such report shall in-
clude— 
(1) an identification of existing offensive and de-
fensive space control systems, policies, and technical 
possibilities of future systems; 
(2) an identification of any gaps or risks in ex-
isting space control system architecture and possibili-
ties for improvement or mitigation of such gaps or 
risks; 
(3) a description of existing and future sensor 
coverage and ground processing capabilities for space 
situational awareness; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00340
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
341 
(4) an explanation of the extent to which all rel-
evant and available information is being utilized for 
space situational awareness to detect, track, and iden-
tify objects in space; 
(5) a description of existing space situational 
awareness data sharing practices, including what in-
formation is being shared and what the benefits and 
risks of such sharing are to the national security of 
the United States; and 
(6) plans for the future space control mission. 
SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) United States Strategic Command has iden-
tified three needs as a result of dramatically increased 
demand and dependence on space capabilities as fol-
lows: 
(A) To rapidly augment existing space ca-
pabilities when needed to expand operational ca-
pability. 
(B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish 
critical space capabilities to preserve continuity 
of operations capability. 
(C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space 
technological or operational innovations to in-
crease the advantage of the United States. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00341
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
342 
(2) Operationally responsive low cost launch 
could assist in addressing such needs of the combatant 
commands. 
(b) STUDY.—The Department of Defense Executive 
Agent for Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low- 
cost launch efforts. Such study shall include— 
(1) a review of existing and past operationally 
responsive, low-cost launch efforts by domestic or for-
eign governments or industry; 
(2) a technology assessment of various methods to 
develop an operationally responsive, low-cost launch 
capability; and 
(3) an assessment of the viability of greater utili-
zation of innovative methods, including the use of sec-
ondary payload adapters on existing launch vehicles. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Ex-
ecutive Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report containing— 
(1) the results of the study conducted under sub-
section (b); and 
(2) a consolidated plan for development within 
the Department of Defense of an operationally respon-
sive, low-cost launch capability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00342
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
343 
Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence 
and Intelligence-Related Activities 
SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHOR-
ITY TO ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES 
AS SECURITY FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLEC-
TION ACTIVITIES. 
(a) 
PERIOD
FOR
REQUIRED
AUDITS.—Section 
432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘annually’’ 
and inserting ‘‘biennially’’; and 
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘the intel-
ligence committees’’ and all that follows and inserting 
‘‘the congressional defense committees and the congres-
sional intelligence committees (as defined in section 
437(c)).’’ 
(b) REPEAL OF DESIGNATION OF DEFENSE INTEL-
LIGENCE AGENCY AS REQUIRED OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY 
WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Section 436(4) of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Defense Intelligence Agency’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Department of Defense’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘management and supervision’’ 
and inserting ‘‘oversight’’. 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—Section 437 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00343
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
344 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the intel-
ligence committees’’ and inserting ‘‘congressional de-
fense committees and the congressional intelligence 
committees’’; 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the intelligence 
committees’’ and inserting ‘‘congressional defense 
committees and the congressional intelligence commit-
tees’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(c) CONGRESSIONAL
INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEES 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘congressional intel-
ligence committees’ has the meaning given the term in sec-
tion 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
3003).’’. 
SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIOR-
ITIES. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) establish a written policy governing the in-
ternal coordination and prioritization of intelligence 
priorities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the 
Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the mili-
tary departments to improve identification of the in-
telligence needs of the Department of Defense; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00344
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
345 
(2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of 
the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, 
the combatant commands, and the military depart-
ments; and 
(3) provide to the congressional defense commit-
tees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the House of Representatives, and the Select Com-
mittee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on the 
policy established under paragraph (1) and the gaps 
identified under paragraph (2). 
SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE. 
(a) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—Not more than 50 
percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense for 
the Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may 
be obligated or expended for the Defense Clandestine Service 
until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the 
covered congressional committees that— 
(1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed 
primarily to— 
(A) fulfill priorities of the Department of 
Defense that are unique to the Department of 
Defense or otherwise unmet; and 
(B) provide unique capabilities to the intel-
ligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00345
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
346 
the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
3003(4))); and 
(2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics 
that will be used to ensure that the Defense Clandes-
tine Service is employed as described in paragraph 
(1). 
(b) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS.—Not later than 120 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 
thereafter for five years, the Secretary of Defense shall sub-
mit to the covered congressional committees a detailed as-
sessment of Defense Clandestine Service employment and 
performance based on the metrics referred to in subsection 
(a)(2). 
(c) NOTIFICATION
OF FUTURE CHANGES
TO DE-
SIGN.—Following the submittal of the certification referred 
to in subsection (a), in the event that any significant 
change is made to the Defense Clandestine Service, the Sec-
retary shall promptly notify the covered congressional com-
mittees of the nature of such change. 
(d) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—The Secretary of De-
fense shall quarterly provide to the covered congressional 
committees a briefing on the deployments and collection ac-
tivities of personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service. 
(e) COVERED
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMITTEES
DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered congressional 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00346
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
347 
committees’’ means the congressional defense committees, 
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on In-
telligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PRO-
GRAM CONSOLIDATION. 
(a) PROHIBITION.—No amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated or otherwise made available to the Department 
of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 
31, 2014, to execute— 
(1) the separation of the National Intelligence 
Program budget from the Department of Defense 
budget; 
(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence 
Program budget within the Department of Defense 
budget; or 
(3) the establishment of a new appropriations 
account or appropriations account structure for the 
National Intelligence Program budget. 
(b) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall 
jointly provide to the congressional defense committees, the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00347
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
348 
of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the Senate a briefing regarding any planning relating 
to the future execution of the activities described in sub-
section (a) that has occurred during the two-year period 
ending on such date and any anticipated future planning 
relating to such execution or related efforts. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) NATIONAL
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM.—The 
term ‘‘National Intelligence Program’’ has the mean-
ing given the term in section 3 of the National Secu-
rity Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). 
(2) NATIONAL
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM
BUDG-
ET.—The term ‘‘National Intelligence Program budg-
et’’ means the portions of the Department of Defense 
budget designated as part of the National Intelligence 
Program. 
Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related 
Matters 
SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVEN-
TORY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TAC-
TICAL DATA LINK SYSTEMS. 
Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2225 note; Public 
Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1885) is amended by inserting 
‘‘and an assessment of vulnerabilities to such systems in 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00348
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
349 
anti-access or area-denial environments’’ before the semi-
colon. 
SEC. 932. DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD ASSESSMENT OF 
UNITED STATES CYBER COMMAND. 
(a) ASSESSMENT.—The Defense Science Board shall 
conduct an assessment of the organization, missions, and 
authorities of the United States Cyber Command. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) A review of the existing organizational struc-
ture of the United States Cyber Command, includ-
ing— 
(A) the positive and negative impact on the 
Command resulting from a single individual si-
multaneously serving as the Commander of the 
United States Cyber Command and the Director 
of the National Security Agency; 
(B) the oversight activities undertaken by 
the Commander and the Director with regard to 
the Command and the Agency, respectively, in-
cluding how the respective oversight activities af-
fect the ability of each entity to complete the re-
spective missions of such entity; 
(C) the dependencies of the Command and 
the Agency on one another under the existing 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00349
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
350 
management structure of both entities, including 
an examination of the advantages and disadvan-
tages attributable to the unity of command and 
unity of effort resulting from a single individual 
simultaneously serving as the Commander of the 
United States Cyber Command and the Director 
of the National Security Agency; 
(D) the ability of the existing management 
structure of the Command and the Agency to 
identify and adequately address potential con-
flicts of interest between the roles of the Com-
mander of the United States Cyber Command 
and the Director of the National Security Agen-
cy; and 
(E) the ability of the Department of Defense 
to train and develop, through professional as-
signment, individuals with the appropriate sub-
ject-matter expertise and management experience 
to support both the cyber operations missions of 
the Command and the signals intelligence mis-
sions of the Agency. 
(2) A review of the missions of the Command, 
including whether the reliance of the Command on the 
Agency for critical warfighting infrastructure, organi-
zation, and personnel contributes to or detracts from 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00350
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
351 
the ability of the Command to achieve the missions of 
the Command. 
(3) A review of how the Commander of the 
United States Cyber Command and the Director of 
the National Security Agency implement authorities 
where missions intersect to ensure that the activities 
of each entity are conducted only pursuant to the re-
spective authorities of each entity. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—Not later than 300 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Defense Science Board shall submit to the Secretary 
of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the 
congressional defense committees, the Permanent Se-
lect Committee on Intelligence of the House of Rep-
resentatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the Senate a report containing— 
(A) the results of the assessment required by 
subsection (a); and 
(B) recommendations for improvements or 
changes to the organization, missions, or au-
thorities of the United States Cyber Command. 
(2) ADDITIONAL
EVALUATION
REQUIRED.—Not 
later than 60 days after the date on which the com-
mittees referred to in paragraph (1) receive the report 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00351
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
352 
required by such paragraph, the Secretary of Defense 
and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly 
submit to such committees an evaluation of the find-
ings and recommendations contained in such report. 
(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph 
(1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may 
include a classified annex. 
(d) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘‘intelligence community’’ has the meaning 
given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 
SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) MISSION ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—Not later than 
one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Defense shall conduct a mission analysis of the 
cyber operations of the Department of Defense. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The mission analysis under sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) The concept of operations and concept of em-
ployment for cyber operations forces. 
(2) An assessment of the manpower needs for 
cyber operations forces, including military require-
ments for both active and reserve components and ci-
vilian requirements. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00352
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
353 
(3) A description of the alignment of the organi-
zation and reporting chains of the Department, the 
military departments, and the combatant commands. 
(4) An assessment of the current, as of the date 
of the analysis, and projected equipping needs of 
cyber operations forces. 
(5) An analysis of how the Secretary, for pur-
poses of cyber operations, depends upon organizations 
outside of the Department, including industry and 
international partners. 
(6) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission as-
surance, and continuity of operations for cyber oper-
ations. 
(7) An evaluation of the potential roles of the re-
serve components in the concept of operations and 
concept of employment for cyber operations forces re-
quired under paragraph (1). 
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after 
the completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report containing— 
(1) the results of the mission analysis; and 
(2) recommendations for improving or changing 
the roles, organization, missions, concept of oper-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00353
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
354 
ations, or authorities related to the cyber operations 
of the Department. 
(d) NATIONAL GUARD ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 
30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the 
report required under subsection (c), the Chief of the Na-
tional Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees an assessment of the role of the National 
Guard in supporting the cyber operations mission of the 
Department of Defense as such mission is described in such 
report. 
(e) FORM.—The report under subsection (c) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
annex. 
SEC. 934. NOTIFICATION OF INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO 
COMPROMISE OF CRITICAL PROGRAM INFOR-
MATION. 
(a) NOTIFICATION OF INVESTIGATION INITIATION.— 
(1) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days after 
the date of the initiation of any investigation related 
to the potential compromise of Department of Defense 
critical program information related to a weapons 
system or other developmental activity, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a written notification of such investiga-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00354
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
355 
tion including the elements required under paragraph 
(2). 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The written notification re-
quired under paragraph (1) shall include, with re-
spect to an investigation described in such subsection, 
the following elements: 
(A) A statement of the reason for such in-
vestigation. 
(B) An identification of each party affected 
by such investigation. 
(C) An identification of the party respon-
sible for conducting such investigation. 
(D) Any preliminary observations, findings, 
or recommendations related to such investiga-
tion. 
(E) A timeline and methodology for con-
ducting such investigation. 
(b) NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF CERTAIN IN-
VESTIGATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 
the completion of any investigation conducted or overseen 
by the Damage Assessment Management Office of the De-
partment of Defense, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a written notifica-
tion of such investigation, including a summary of the find-
ings and recommendations of such investigation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00355
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
356 
(c) REPORT
ON INTRUSIONS AFTER JANUARY 1, 
2000.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report detailing the 
known network cyber intrusions that occurred on or after 
January 1, 2000, and before August 1, 2013, and resulted 
in the compromise of critical program information related 
to a weapons system, information system development, or 
another research and development initiative of the Depart-
ment of Defense. Such report shall include a description of 
the critical program information that was compromised, 
the source of each network that was compromised, the sys-
tems or developmental activities that were compromised, 
and the suspected origin of each cyber intrusion. 
SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE 
SOFTWARE LICENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE. 
(a) UPDATED PLAN.— 
(1) UPDATE.—The Chief Information Officer of 
the Department of the Defense shall, in consultation 
with the chief information officers of the military de-
partments and the Defense Agencies, update the plan 
for the inventory of selected software licenses of the 
Department of Defense required under section 937 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00356
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
357 
(Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to in-
clude a plan for the inventory of all software licenses 
of the Department of Defense for which a military de-
partment spends more than $5,000,000 annually on 
any individual title, including a comparison of li-
censes purchased with licenses installed and of those 
uninstalled and then reinstalled. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The update required under 
paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) be done in a comprehensive and 
auditable format that is verified by an inde-
pendent third party; 
(B) include details on the process and busi-
ness systems necessary to regularly perform re-
views, a procedure for validating and reporting 
deregistering and registering new software, and 
a mechanism and plan to relay that information 
to the enterprise provider; and 
(C) a proposed timeline for implementation 
of the updated plan in accordance with para-
graph (3). 
(3) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than Sep-
tember 30, 2013, the Chief Information Officer of the 
Department of Defense shall implement the updated 
plan required under paragraph (1). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00357
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
358 
(b) PERFORMANCE PLAN.—If the Chief Information 
Officer of the Department of Defense determines through the 
update required by subsection (a) that the number of soft-
ware licenses of the Department for an individual title for 
which a military department spends greater than 
$5,000,000 annually exceeds the needs of the Department 
for such software licenses, or the inventory discloses that 
there is a discrepancy between the number of software li-
censes purchased and those in actual use, the Secretary of 
Defense shall implement a plan to bring the number of such 
software licenses into balance with the needs of the Depart-
ment and the terms of any relevant contract. 
Subtitle E—Total Force 
Management 
SEC. 941. REQUIREMENT TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT LEVELS 
OF GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT OF FUNCTIONS 
CLOSELY 
ASSOCIATED 
WITH 
INHERENTLY 
GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 129a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(g) REQUIREMENT FOR OVERSIGHT OR APPROPRIATE 
CORRECTIVE
ACTIONS.—For 
purposes 
of 
subsection 
(f)(3)(B), if insufficient levels of Government oversight are 
found, the Secretary of the military department or head of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00358
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
359 
the Defense Agency responsible shall provide such oversight 
or take appropriate corrective actions, including potential 
conversion to Government performance, consistent with this 
section and sections 129 and 2463 of this title.’’. 
(b) AMENDMENT RELATING TO REVIEW OF CERTAIN 
CONTRACTS.—Subsection (e)(2)(C) of section 2330a of such 
title is amended by adding after ‘‘governmental functions’’ 
the following: ‘‘in which there is inadequate oversight of the 
contractor personnel performing such functions’’. 
SEC. 942. FIVE-YEAR REQUIREMENT FOR CERTIFICATION 
OF 
APPROPRIATE 
MANPOWER 
PERFORM-
ANCE. 
Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as 
subsections (h) and (i), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following 
new section (g): 
‘‘(g) CERTIFICATIONS OF APPROPRIATE MANPOWER 
PERFORMANCE.—(1) Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and 
continuing through fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of De-
fense, or an official designated personally by the Secretary, 
no later than February 1 of each reporting year, shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees the findings of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00359
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
360 
the reviews required under subsection (e) and certify in 
writing that— 
‘‘(A) all Department of Defense contractor posi-
tions identified as being responsible for the perform-
ance of inherently governmental functions have been 
eliminated; 
‘‘(B) each Department of Defense contract that is 
a personal services contract has been entered into, and 
is being performed, in accordance with applicable 
laws and regulations; and 
‘‘(C) any contract for services that includes any 
functions that are closely associated with inherently 
governmental functions or designated as critical have 
been reviewed to determine if those activities should 
be— 
‘‘(i) subject to action pursuant to section 
2463 of this title; or 
‘‘(ii) converted to an acquisition approach 
that would be more advantageous to the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
‘‘(2) If the certifications required in paragraph (1) are 
not submitted by the date required in a reporting year, the 
Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall assess 
the Department’s compliance with subsection (e) and deter-
mine why the Secretary could not make the certifications 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00360
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
361 
required in paragraph (1). The Inspector General shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 
May 1 of the reporting year, a report on such assessment 
and determination. 
‘‘(3) Not later than May 1 of each reporting year, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report containing the 
Comptroller General’s assessment of the reviews conducted 
under subsection (e) and the actions taken to resolve the 
findings of the reviews.’’. 
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the 
Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in 
the national interest, the Secretary may transfer 
amounts of authorizations made available to the De-
partment of Defense in this division for fiscal year 
2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal 
year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of au-
thorizations so transferred shall be merged with and 
be available for the same purposes as the authoriza-
tion to which transferred. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00361
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
362 
(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in para-
graph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the 
Secretary may transfer under the authority of this 
section may not exceed $3,500,000,000. 
(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILI-
TARY
PERSONNEL
AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of 
funds between military personnel authorizations 
under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar 
limitation in paragraph (2). 
(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by sub-
section (a) to transfer authorizations— 
(1) may only be used to provide authority for 
items that have a higher priority than the items from 
which authority is transferred; and 
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an 
item that has been denied authorization by Congress. 
(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A trans-
fer made from one account to another under the authority 
of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount au-
thorized for the account to which the amount is transferred 
by an amount equal to the amount transferred. 
(d) NOTICE
TO
CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall 
promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under sub-
section (a). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00362
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
363 
SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 
shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled 
‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, 
submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the 
Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives, as long as such statement has been sub-
mitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 
SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL 
YEAR 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—Congress— 
(1) reaffirms the findings of the Panel on De-
fense Financial Management and Auditability Re-
form of the Committee on Armed Services of the 
House of Representatives; 
(2) points to the Government Accountability Of-
fice’s most recent High Risk List recommendations; 
(3) is encouraged by the important progress the 
Department of Defense has made in achieving 
auditability; and 
(4) stands ready to continue helping in this ef-
fort. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DOD FINANCIAL MAN-
AGEMENT REFORM.—It is the sense of Congress that, in the 
aftermath of the effects of sequestration as enacted by the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00363
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
381 
SEC. 1031. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COM-
BATING TERRORISM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM 
REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, including 
engagement activities for program alumni,’’ after ‘‘ef-
fectiveness of the program’’; 
(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ‘‘pro-
gram’’ the following: ‘‘, including a list of any un-
funded or unmet training requirements and requests’’; 
and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(5) A discussion and justification of how the 
program fits within the theater security priorities of 
each of the commanders of the geographic combatant 
commands.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
section (a) shall apply with respect to a report submitted 
for a fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:28 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00381
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1960.RH
H1960
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS