datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(4) DIVESTITURE IN CASE OF LOSS OF EX-
EMPTION.—If any company described in paragraph
(1) fails to qualify for the exemption provided under
such paragraph by operation of paragraph (2), such
exemption shall cease to apply to such company and
such company shall divest control of each bank it
controls before the end of the 180-day period begin-
ning on the date that the company receives notice
from the Board that the company has failed to con-
tinue to qualify for such exemption, unless before
the end of such 180-day period, the company has—
‘‘(A) corrected the condition or ceased the
activity that caused the company to fail to con-
tinue to qualify for the exemption; and
‘‘(B) implemented procedures that are rea-
sonably adapted to avoid the reoccurrence of
such condition or activity.’’.
(b) INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANIES AFFILIATE OVER-
DRAFTS.—Section 2(c)(2)(H) of the Bank Holding Com-
pany Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841(c)(2)(H)) is amended
by inserting before the period at the end ‘‘, or that is oth-
erwise permissible for a bank controlled by a company de-
scribed in section 4(f)(1)’’.
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 118 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), 
SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS: LAND-
SCAPE 
ARCHITECT 
FREDERICK 
LAW 
OLMSTEAD’S DESIGN FOR DEMOCRACY. 
(a) PRINTING AS HOUSE DOCUMENT.—The book en-
titled ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: Landscape Archi-
tect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design for Democracy’’,
•HCON 118 EH 
prepared by the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, shall 
be printed as a House document under the direction of 
the Joint Committee on Printing. 
(b) STYLE; BINDING.—The book described in sub-
section (a) shall be printed in such style, form, and man-
ner and with such binding as the Joint Committee on 
Printing may direct, in consultation with the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate. 
(c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual 
number of copies, there shall be printed for the use of the 
Architect of the Capitol the lesser of— 
(1) 5,000 copies of the book printed under this 
section; or 
(2) such number of copies of the book as does 
not exceed a total production and printing cost of 
$400,000. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2018. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 118 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Authorizing the printing of ‘‘United States Capitol 
Grounds: Landscape Architect Frederick Law 
Olmstead’s Design for Democracy’’ as a House 
document.
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 118 
Authorizing the printing of ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: Landscape Archi-
tect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design for Democracy’’ as a House 
document. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 25, 2018 
Mr. HARPER (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) submitted the fol-
lowing concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
House Administration 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Authorizing the printing of ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: 
Landscape Architect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design 
for Democracy’’ as a House document. 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), 
SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS: LAND-
SCAPE 
ARCHITECT 
FREDERICK 
LAW 
OLMSTEAD’S DESIGN FOR DEMOCRACY. 
(a) PRINTING AS HOUSE DOCUMENT.—The book en-
titled ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: Landscape Archi-
tect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design for Democracy’’, 
prepared by the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, shall 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:01 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC118.IH
HC118
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
•HCON 118 IH 
be printed as a House document under the direction of 
the Joint Committee on Printing. 
(b) STYLE; BINDING.—The book described in sub-
section (a) shall be printed in such style, form, and man-
ner and with such binding as the Joint Committee on 
Printing may direct, in consultation with the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate. 
(c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual 
number of copies, there shall be printed for the use of the 
Architect of the Capitol the lesser of— 
(1) 5,000 copies of the book printed under this 
section; or 
(2) such number of copies of the book as does 
not exceed a total production and printing cost of 
$400,000. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:01 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC118.IH
HC118
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
III 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 118 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
MAY 7, 2018 
Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Authorizing the printing of ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: 
Landscape Architect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design 
for Democracy’’ as a House document. 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), 
SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS: LAND-
SCAPE 
ARCHITECT 
FREDERICK 
LAW 
OLMSTEAD’S DESIGN FOR DEMOCRACY. 
(a) PRINTING AS HOUSE DOCUMENT.—The book en-
titled ‘‘United States Capitol Grounds: Landscape Archi-
tect Frederick Law Olmstead’s Design for Democracy’’, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:40 May 07, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC118.RFS
HC118
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
HCON 118 RFS 
prepared by the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, shall 
be printed as a House document under the direction of 
the Joint Committee on Printing. 
(b) STYLE; BINDING.—The book described in sub-
section (a) shall be printed in such style, form, and man-
ner and with such binding as the Joint Committee on 
Printing may direct, in consultation with the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate. 
(c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual 
number of copies, there shall be printed for the use of the 
Architect of the Capitol the lesser of— 
(1) 5,000 copies of the book printed under this 
section; or 
(2) such number of copies of the book as does 
not exceed a total production and printing cost of 
$400,000. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2018. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:40 May 07, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC118.RFS
HC118
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
H. R. 4818—455
of travel expenses, or for the salaries of employees of such Commis-
sion.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF TRUST FUNDS)
For necessary expenses of the Office of Inspector General in
carrying out the provisions of the Inspector General Act, as
amended, including services as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3109, hire
of passenger motor vehicles, $1,627,000, and in addition, not to
exceed $16,461,000 for administrative expenses to audit, inves-
tigate, and provide other oversight of the Office of Personnel
Management’s retirement and insurance programs, to be trans-
ferred from the appropriate trust funds of the Office of Personnel
Management, as determined by the Inspector General: Provided,
That the Inspector General is authorized to rent conference rooms
in the District of Columbia and elsewhere.
GOVERNMENT PAYMENT FOR ANNUITANTS, EMPLOYEES HEALTH
BENEFITS
For payment of Government contributions with respect to
retired employees, as authorized by chapter 89 of title 5, United
States Code, and the Retired Federal Employees Health Benefits
Act (74 Stat. 849), as amended, such sums as may be necessary.
GOVERNMENT PAYMENT FOR ANNUITANTS, EMPLOYEE LIFE
INSURANCE
For payment of Government contributions with respect to
employees retiring after December 31, 1989, as required by chapter
87 of title 5, United States Code, such sums as may be necessary.
PAYMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY FUND
For financing the unfunded liability of new and increased
annuity benefits becoming effective on or after October 20, 1969,
as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 8348, and annuities under special Acts
to be credited to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund,
such sums as may be necessary: Provided, That annuities author-
ized by the Act of May 29, 1944, as amended, and the Act of
August 19, 1950, as amended (33 U.S.C. 771–775), may hereafter
be paid out of the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
For necessary expenses to carry out functions of the Office
of Special Counsel pursuant to Reorganization Plan Numbered 2
of 1978, the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–
454), as amended, the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (Public
Law 101–12), as amended, Public Law 103–424, and the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Act of 1994 (Public Law
103–353), including services as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3109, pay-
ment of fees and expenses for witnesses, rental of conference rooms
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5107 
To protect crime victims’ rights, to eliminate the substantial backlog of 
DNA samples collected from crime scenes and convicted offenders, to 
improve and expand the DNA testing capacity of Federal, State, and 
local crime laboratories, to increase research and development of new 
DNA testing technologies, to develop new training programs regarding 
the collection and use of DNA evidence, to provide post-conviction testing 
of DNA evidence to exonerate the innocent, to improve the performance 
of counsel in State capital cases, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 
Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. COBLE, 
Mr. DELAHUNT, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. 
SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. WEINER, Ms. HART, 
Mr. BACHUS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. KELLER, and Mr. NADLER) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To protect crime victims’ rights, to eliminate the substantial 
backlog of DNA samples collected from crime scenes 
and convicted offenders, to improve and expand the DNA 
testing capacity of Federal, State, and local crime labora-
tories, to increase research and development of new DNA 
testing technologies, to develop new training programs 
regarding the collection and use of DNA evidence, to 
provide post-conviction testing of DNA evidence to exon-
erate the innocent, to improve the performance of counsel 
in State capital cases, and for other purposes.
•HCON 119 EH 
Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 
will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and elec-
tricity; 
Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elder-
ly, and those on fixed incomes; 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 
moving overseas; 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 
Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 
carbon tax; 
Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administra-
tion, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption 
was 81 percent; 
Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 
manufactured in the United States; 
Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 
on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic re-
gions and would further restrict the global competitive-
ness of the United States; 
Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 
exploration and development and has increased produc-
tion of domestic energy resources on private and State- 
owned land which has created significant job growth and 
private capital investment; 
Whereas United States energy policy should encourage con-
tinued private sector innovation and development and not 
increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 
Whereas the production of American energy resources in-
creases the United States ability to maintain a competi-
tive advantage in today’s global economy;
•HCON 119 EH 
Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competi-
tiveness and would encourage development abroad in 
countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 
and 
Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on pro- 
growth solutions that encourage increased development of 
domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 
tax would be detrimental to American families and busi-
nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2018. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 119 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax 
would be detrimental to the United States economy.
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 119 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental 
to the United States economy. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 26, 2018 
Mr. SCALISE (for himself and Mr. MCKINLEY) submitted the following concur-
rent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would 
be detrimental to the United States economy. 
Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 
from fossil fuels; 
Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 
the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 
heating oil; 
Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 
will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and elec-
tricity; 
Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elder-
ly, and those on fixed incomes; 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 
moving overseas; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:27 Apr 27, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC119.IH
HC119
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
•HCON 119 IH 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 
Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 
carbon tax; 
Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administra-
tion, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption 
was 81 percent; 
Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 
manufactured in the United States; 
Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 
on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic re-
gions and would further restrict the global competitive-
ness of the United States; 
Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 
exploration and development and has increased produc-
tion of domestic energy resources on private and State- 
owned land which has created significant job growth and 
private capital investment; 
Whereas United States energy policy should encourage con-
tinued private sector innovation and development and not 
increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 
Whereas the production of American energy resources in-
creases the United States ability to maintain a competi-
tive advantage in today’s global economy; 
Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competi-
tiveness and would encourage development abroad in 
countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 
and 
Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on pro- 
growth solutions that encourage increased development of 
domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:27 Apr 27, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC119.IH
HC119
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
•HCON 119 IH 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 
tax would be detrimental to American families and busi-
nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:27 Apr 27, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC119.IH
HC119
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are as fol-
lows:
(1) To enhance competition in the financial
services industry, in order to foster innovation and
efficiency.
(2) To ensure the continued safety and sound-
ness of depository institutions.
(3) To provide necessary and appropriate pro-
tections for investors and ensure fair and honest
markets in the delivery of financial services.
(4) To avoid duplicative, potentially conflicting,
and overly burdensome regulatory requirements
through the creation of a regulatory framework for
financial holding companies that respects the diver-
gent requirements of each of the component busi-
nesses of the holding company, and that is based
upon principles of strong functional regulation and
enhanced regulatory coordination.
(5) To reduce and, to the maximum extent
practicable, to eliminate the legal barriers preventing
affiliation among depository institutions, securities
firms, insurance companies, and other financial serv-
ice providers and to provide a prudential framework
for achieving that result.
III 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 119 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 23, 2018 
Received and referred to the Committee on Finance 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would 
be detrimental to the United States economy. 
Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 
from fossil fuels; 
Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 
the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 
heating oil; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:04 Jul 23, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC119.RFS
HC119
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
HCON 119 RFS 
Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 
will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and elec-
tricity; 
Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elder-
ly, and those on fixed incomes; 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 
moving overseas; 
Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 
Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 
carbon tax; 
Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administra-
tion, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption 
was 81 percent; 
Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 
manufactured in the United States; 
Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 
on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic re-
gions and would further restrict the global competitive-
ness of the United States; 
Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 
exploration and development and has increased produc-
tion of domestic energy resources on private and State- 
owned land which has created significant job growth and 
private capital investment; 
Whereas United States energy policy should encourage con-
tinued private sector innovation and development and not 
increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 
Whereas the production of American energy resources in-
creases the United States ability to maintain a competi-
tive advantage in today’s global economy; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:04 Jul 23, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC119.RFS
HC119
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
HCON 119 RFS 
Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competi-
tiveness and would encourage development abroad in 
countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 
and 
Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on pro- 
growth solutions that encourage increased development of 
domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 
tax would be detrimental to American families and busi-
nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2018. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:04 Jul 23, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC119.RFS
HC119
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 11 
Expressing the sense of Congress that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel 
and therefore, consistent with the location of other United States embas-
sies, the United States embassy in Israel should be located in Jerusalem. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 23, 2017 
Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. SHERMAN) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of Congress that Jerusalem is the cap-
ital of Israel and therefore, consistent with the location 
of other United States embassies, the United States em-
bassy in Israel should be located in Jerusalem. 
Whereas the city of Jerusalem is the seat of Israel’s Govern-
ment, including its President, Parliament, and Supreme 
Court, and is the site of numerous government ministries 
and social and cultural institutions; 
Whereas since June 7, 1967, the city of Jerusalem has been 
an undivided city; 
Whereas since 1995, it has been Federal law to recognize Je-
rusalem as the capital of Israel and to relocate to Jeru-
salem the United States Embassy in Israel, and this law 
has not been superseded; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 Jan 23, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC11.IH
HC11
smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
•HCON 11 IH 
Whereas this sense of Congress has no bearing on the final 
status of Jerusalem as the United States is not a party 
to the Israel-Palestinian conflict; 
Whereas the United States maintains its embassy in the 
functioning capital of every country except in the case of 
the United States democratic friend and strategic ally, 
the State of Israel; and 
Whereas the United States maintains a consulate in the city 
of Jerusalem that conducts the official business of the 
United States Government: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the United States Government should offi-
cially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel; 
and 
(2) the United States embassy in Israel should 
be located in the city of Jerusalem. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 Jan 23, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC11.IH
HC11
smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 120 
Supporting a bold and sustained expansion of Federal investments in 
affordable rental homes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 8, 2018 
Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. SOTO, Mr. CAPUANO, 
Mr. KIHUEN, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. BEYER, Ms. BARRAGA´N, 
Mr. KHANNA, Ms. VELA´ZQUEZ, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, 
Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of Cali-
fornia, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Supporting a bold and sustained expansion of Federal 
investments in affordable rental homes. 
Whereas evidence-based research has shown that families 
with safe, decent, accessible, and affordable homes of 
their choice are better able to find employment, achieve 
economic mobility, perform better in school, and maintain 
improved health; 
Whereas providing housing assistance is one of the most ef-
fective ways to help families, children, and youth escape 
poverty and domestic violence; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:17 May 08, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC120.IH
HC120
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS