H. R. 1540—355 
SEC. 1303. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR COOPERA-
TIVE BIOLOGICAL ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM. 
(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
by section 1302(a)(4) or otherwise made available for fiscal year 
2012 for cooperative biological engagement, not more than 80 per-
cent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the 
Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional 
committees the following: 
(1) A detailed analysis of the effect of the cooperative 
biological engagement program. 
(2) Either— 
(A) written certification that the efforts of the coopera-
tive biological engagement program— 
(i) result in changed practices or are otherwise 
effective; and 
(ii) lead to threat reduction; or 
(B) a detailed list of policy and program recommenda-
tions considered necessary by the Secretary to modify, 
expand, or curtail the cooperative biological engagement 
program in order to achieve the objectives described by 
subparagraph (A). 
(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 
the following: 
(1) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 
(2) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 
SEC. 1304. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 
CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF 
THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 
Not more than $500,000 of the fiscal year 2012 Cooperative 
Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended to establish 
a center of excellence in a country that is not a state of the 
former Soviet Union until the date that is 15 days after the date 
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report that includes the following: 
(1) An identification of the country in which the center 
will be located. 
(2) A description of the purpose for which the center will 
be established. 
(3) The agreement under which the center will operate. 
(4) A funding plan for the center, including— 
(A) the amount of funds to be provided by the govern-
ment of the country in which the center will be located; 
and 
(B) the percentage of the total cost of establishing 
and operating the center the funds described in subpara-
graph (A) will cover. 
TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Programs 
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 
Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
H. R. 1540—356 
Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 
Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 
Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. 
Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized dis-
posals from the National Defense Stockpile. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
Sec. 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 
Sec. 1422. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Depart-
ment of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Cap-
tain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 
Subtitle A—Military Programs 
SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4501. 
SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year 2012 for the 
National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table 
in section 4501. 
(b) AUTHORIZED PROCUREMENT.—Funds appropriated pursuant 
to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) may be 
used to purchase an offshore petroleum distribution system, and 
the associated tender for that system, that are under charter by 
the Military Sealift Command as of January 1, 2011. 
SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for 
fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chem-
ical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in 
the funding table in section 4501. 
(b) USE.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under sub-
section (a) are authorized for— 
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 
Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and 
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 
United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 
Act. 
SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 
Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
H. R. 1540—357 
SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 
SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activi-
ties and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for 
the health of eligible beneficiaries. 
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 
SEC. 1411. AUTHORIZED USES OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE 
FUNDS. 
(a) OBLIGATION OF STOCKPILE FUNDS.—During fiscal year 2012, 
the National Defense Stockpile Manager may obligate up to 
$50,107,320 of the funds in the National Defense Stockpile Trans-
action Fund established under subsection (a) of section 9 of the 
Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h) 
for the authorized uses of such funds under subsection (b)(2) of 
such section, including the disposal of hazardous materials that 
are environmentally sensitive. 
(b) ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS.—The National Defense Stockpile 
Manager may obligate amounts in excess of the amount specified 
in subsection (a) if the National Defense Stockpile Manager notifies 
Congress that extraordinary or emergency conditions necessitate 
the additional obligations. The National Defense Stockpile Manager 
may make the additional obligations described in the notification 
after the end of the 45-day period beginning on the date on which 
Congress receives the notification. 
(c) LIMITATIONS.—The authorities provided by this section shall 
be subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations 
Acts. 
SEC. 1412. REVISION TO REQUIRED RECEIPT OBJECTIVES FOR PRE-
VIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DISPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL 
DEFENSE STOCKPILE. 
Section 3402(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as 
most recently amended by section 1412 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 
383; 124 Stat. 4412), is further amended by striking ‘‘$730,000,000 
by the end of fiscal year 2013’’ in paragraph (5) and inserting 
‘‘$830,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2016’’. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
SEC. 1421. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 
RETIREMENT HOME. 
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the 
sum of $67,700,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retire-
ment Home.
H. R. 1540—358 
SEC. 1422. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN 
JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 
(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the funds author-
ized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense 
Health Program for operation and maintenance, $135,600,000 may 
be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department 
of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Dem-
onstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection 
(a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated 
as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose 
of such a transfer. 
(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For purposes of subsection 
(b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds trans-
ferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the 
Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting 
of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy 
Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as 
a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement 
covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4500). 
TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDI-
TIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVER-
SEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 
Sec. 1501. Purpose. 
Sec. 1502. Procurement. 
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 
Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1507. Defense Health Program. 
Sec. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1509. Defense Inspector General. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 
Sec. 1531. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
Sec. 1532. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain fa-
cilities projects in Iraq. 
Sec. 1533. Availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 
Sec. 1534. One-year extension of project authority and related requirements of 
Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1535. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 
Sec. 1536. Report on lessons learned from Department of Defense participation on 
interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and 
Iraq.
H. R. 1540—359 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional 
Appropriations 
SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for 
the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 to provide additional 
funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by 
the Armed Forces. 
SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the 
Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as speci-
fied in the funding table in section 4102. 
SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in 
section 4202. 
SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the 
funding table in section 4302. 
SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4402. 
SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4502. 
SEC. 1507. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 
funding table in section 4502. 
SEC. 1508. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 
Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 
SEC. 1509. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise
H. R. 1540—360 
provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 
by this Act. 
SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 
Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 
the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 
available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal 
year 2012 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 
(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 
transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 
same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that 
the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this sub-
section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 
(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this section shall 
be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under 
section 1001. 
(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided 
by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided 
under section 1001. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 
SEC. 1531. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 
(a) USE
AND TRANSFER
OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) 
of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), 
as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the 
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the 
funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint 
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2012. 
(b) MONTHLY OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.—Not 
later than 15 days after the end of each month of fiscal year 
2012, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the Joint Improvised Explosive 
Device Defeat Fund explaining monthly commitments, obligations, 
and expenditures by line of action. 
SEC. 1532. CONTINUATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF UNITED 
STATES FUNDS FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES PROJECTS IN 
IRAQ. 
Section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4651) shall apply to funds authorized to be appropriated 
by this title.
H. R. 1540—361 
SEC. 1533. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN AFGHANISTAN SECURITY 
FORCES FUND. 
(a) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS.—Funds available 
to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces 
Fund for fiscal year 2012 shall be subject to the conditions contained 
in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 
(b) AVAILABILITY FOR LITERACY INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING.— 
Assistance provided utilizing funds in the Afghanistan Security 
Forces Fund may include literacy instruction and training to build 
the logistical, management, and administrative capacity of military 
and civilian personnel of the Ministry of Defense and Ministry 
of Interior, including through instruction at training facilities of 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Training Mission in 
Afghanistan. 
(c) MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTS.—Not later 
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report containing the Secretary’s determination 
regarding whether the Department of Defense has sufficient 
management and oversight mechanisms in place with respect to 
contracts to be entered into during fiscal year 2012 using funds 
in the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. If the Secretary deter-
mines that sufficient management and oversight mechanisms are 
not already in place, the Secretary shall include in the report 
a plan for improving such management and oversight mechanisms. 
SEC. 1534. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PROJECT AUTHORITY AND 
RELATED REQUIREMENTS OF TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS 
AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike 
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (6)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘October 31, 2011,’’ and inserting 
‘‘October 31, 2011, and October 31, 2012’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘the 
preceding fiscal year’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 
(b) AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.—Paragraph (3) of such subsection 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(3) SCOPE OF PROJECTS.—The projects carried out under 
paragraph (1) may include projects that facilitate private invest-
ment, mining sector development, industrial development, and 
other projects determined by the Secretary of Defense, with 
the concurrence of the Secretary of State, as strengthening 
stability or providing strategic support to the counterinsurgency 
campaign in Afghanistan. To the maximum extent possible, 
the activities of the Task Force for Business and Stability 
Operations in Afghanistan should focus on improving the 
commercial viability of other reconstruction or development 
activities in Afghanistan conducted by the United States.’’.
H. R. 1540—362 
(c) FUNDING LIMITATION.—Paragraph (4) of such subsection 
is amended— 
(1) by inserting before the period at the end of the second 
sentence the following: ‘‘for fiscal year 2012, except that not 
more than 50 percent of such amount may be obligated until 
the plan required by subsection (b) is submitted to the appro-
priate congressional committees’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The 
funds shall be available for projects under paragraph (1) that 
begin in one fiscal year and end in the following fiscal year.’’. 
SEC. 1535. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR TRANS 
REGIONAL WEB INITIATIVE. 
None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act may be obligated or expended on any program under the Trans 
Regional Web Initiative of the Department of Defense, or any 
similar initiative, until the Secretary of Defense certifies, in writing, 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives that such program— 
(1) appropriately defines its target audience; 
(2) is determined to be the most effective method to reach 
such target audience; 
(3) is the most cost-effective means of reaching such target 
audience; and 
(4) includes measurement mechanisms to ensure such tar-
get audience is being reached. 
SEC. 1536. REPORT ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE PARTICIPATION ON INTERAGENCY TEAMS FOR 
COUNTERTERRORISM 
OPERATIONS 
IN 
AFGHANISTAN 
AND IRAQ. 
(a) ASSESSMENT
AND REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall direct a federally funded research and development 
center to conduct an assessment on lessons learned from the use 
of interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan 
and Iraq. Not later than one year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report containing the results of the assessment, 
together with the comments of the Secretary regarding the assess-
ment and each of the elements of the assessment specified in 
subsection (b). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment and report required by sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) An assessment of the value of interagency teams in 
counterterrorism operations. 
(2) An explanation of how and why the requirements for 
effective interagency teams differ from teams composed entirely 
of Department of Defense personnel. 
(3) A description of the best practices of such interagency 
teams and efforts to codify such best practices. 
(4) A description of the challenges in forming and operating 
effective interagency teams. 
(5) An assessment whether the lessons learned through 
Department of Defense participation on such interagency teams 
is applicable to other interagency teams in which Department 
personnel participate.
H. R. 1540—363 
(6) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of 
adding a skill identifier to track Department civilian and mili-
tary personnel who have successfully supported, participated 
on, or led an interagency team. 
(7) A description of the additional authorities, if any, 
needed to permit Department personnel to more effectively 
support, participate on, or lead an interagency team. 
(c) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form to the extent possible, 
but may include a classified annex. 
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS 
REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.— 
Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 
in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land 
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions 
to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 
on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2015. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations 
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authoriza-
tions of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for fiscal year 2015 for military construction projects, land 
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. 
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 
Sec. 2108. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 
Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 
Sec. 2110. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 
Sec. 2111. Tour normalization.
H. R. 1540—364 
Sec. 2112. Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications. 
Sec. 2113. Reduction of Army military construction authorization. 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ........................
Fort Wainwright ......................................
$114,000,000 
JB Elmendorf-Richardson .......................
$103,600,000 
Alabama ....................
Fort Rucker ..............................................
$11,600,000 
California ...................
Fort Irwin .................................................
$23,000,000 
Presidio Monterey ....................................
$3,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ..............................................
$238,600,000 
Georgia ......................
Fort Benning ............................................
$66,700,000 
Fort Gordon ..............................................
$1,450,000 
Fort Stewart .............................................
$2,600,000 
Hawaii .......................
Fort Shafter .............................................
$17,500,000 
Schofield Barracks ...................................
$105,000,000 
Kansas .......................
Forbes Air Field .......................................
$5,300,000 
Fort Riley .................................................
$83,400,000 
Kentucky ...................
Fort Campbell ..........................................
$247,500,000 
Fort Knox .................................................
$55,000,000 
Louisiana ...................
Fort Polk ..................................................
$70,100,000 
Maryland ...................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ......................
$78,500,000 
Fort Meade ...............................................
$79,000,000 
Missouri .....................
Fort Leonard Wood ..................................
$49,000,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg ................................................
$186,000,000 
New York ...................
Fort Drum ................................................
$13,300,000 
Oklahoma ..................
Fort Sill ....................................................
$184,600,000 
McAlester .................................................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson .............................................
$63,900,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ..................................................
$122,500,000 
Fort Hood .................................................
$132,000,000 
JB San Antonio ........................................
$10,400,000 
Red River Army Depot ............................
$44,000,000 
Utah ...........................
Dugway Proving Ground .........................
$32,000,000 
Virginia ......................
Fort Belvoir ..............................................
$77,000,000 
JB Langley Eustis ...................................
$26,000,000 
Washington ...............
JB Lewis McChord ..................................
$296,300,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
H. R. 1540—366 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for 
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Army shall not enter 
into an award for a Road and Infrastructure Improvements project 
at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, until the Secretary certifies to the congres-
sional defense committees that sufficient private funding has been 
raised and a construction award has been made to concurrently 
construct the ‘‘Baseline Museum’’ phase of the National Museum 
of the United States Army. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 
4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for construction of a Multipurpose 
Training Range at the installation, the Secretary of the Army 
may construct up to 1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent 
with the Army’s construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training 
Ranges. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) 
for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, for construction of an 
access road adjoining McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis, 
the Secretary of the Army may construct a secure elevated roadway 
over the existing railroad and public road in lieu of an on-grade 
road and access control point. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization contained in the 
table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 
Stat. 4437) for Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of 
buildings 450 and 452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate 
building 451 in lieu of building 452. 
(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization contained 
in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 
111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction 
of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary 
of the Army may construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking 
apron consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Aircraft 
Maintenance Hangars and associated parking aprons. 
(c) GERMANY.—In the case of the authorization contained in 
the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 
124 Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden Air Base, Germany, for construction 
of an Information Processing Center at the installation, the Sec-
retary of the Army may construct up to 9,400 square yards of
H. R. 1540—367 
vehicle parking garage consistent with the Army’s construction 
guidelines for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 square 
yards of parking area. 
SEC. 2108. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Army may 
carry out a military construction project to construct a water treat-
ment facility for Fort Irwin, California, in the amount of 
$115,000,000. 
(b) 
USE
OF
UNOBLIGATED
PRIOR-YEAR
ARMY
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.—The Secretary may use available, unobli-
gated Army military construction funds appropriated for a fiscal 
year before fiscal year 2012 for the project described in subsection 
(a). 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 
shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of 
title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in 
subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated 
project cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by 
section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and scope of 
work variations. 
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 
Act (122 Stat. 504), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Louisiana 
Fort Polk .............
Child Care Facility ..........................
$6,100,000 
Missouri
Fort Leonard 
Wood.
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 
$4,150,000 
SEC. 2110. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B 
of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 
Act (122 Stat. 4659), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
H. R. 1540—368 
Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Alabama ....
Anniston Army Depot 
Lake Yard Interchange ........
$1,400,000 
Hawaii .......
Schofield Barracks .....
Brigade Complex ..................
$65,000,000 
....................
Schofield Barracks .....
Battalion Complex ................
$69,000,000 
....................
Schofield Barracks .....
Battalion Complex ................
$27,000,000 
....................
Schofield Barracks .....
Infrastructure Expansion ....
$76,000,000 
New Jersey 
Picatinny Arsenal ......
Ballistic Evaluation Facility 
Phase I ...............................
$9,900,000 
Virginia .....
Fort Eustis .................
Vehicle Paint Facility ...........
$3,900,000 
SEC. 2111. TOUR NORMALIZATION. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this 
Act may be obligated or expended for additional tour normalization 
until— 
(1) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evalua-
tion conducts an analysis of alternatives to tour normalization 
that identifies alternative courses of action and their associated 
life cycle costs, potential benefits, advantages, and disadvan-
tages; 
(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a master plan for completing all phases 
of tour normalization that includes a detailed description of 
all costs and a schedule for the construction of necessary facili-
ties and infrastructure; and 
(3) legislation enacted after the date of the enactment 
of this Act authorizes the obligation of funds for such purpose. 
SEC. 2112. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT CERTAIN PROJECT 
SPECIFICATIONS. 
The table in section 3002 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 
Stat. 4503) is amended— 
(1) in the item for the Army relating to ‘‘Entry Control 
Point and Access Roads’’ that appears immediately below the 
item relating to ‘‘Vet Clinic & Kennel’’ at Bagram Air Force 
Base, by striking ‘‘Delaram Ii’’ in the State/Country and 
Installation column and inserting ‘‘Delaram II’’; and 
(2) in the item for the Army that appears immediately 
below the item relating to ‘‘Electrical Utility Systems, Ph.2’’ 
at the Shank installation, by striking ‘‘Expand Extended 
Cooperation Programme I and Extended Cooperation Pro-
gramme 2’’ in the Project Title column and inserting ‘‘Expand 
Entry Control Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2’’. 
SEC. 
2113. 
REDUCTION 
OF 
ARMY 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Army for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are 
hereby reduced by $100,000,000.
H. R. 1540—369 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 
Sec. 2206. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 
Sec. 2207. Guam realignment. 
Sec. 2208. Reduction of Navy military construction authorization. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .............
Yuma ................................................................
$162,785,000 
California ..........
Barstow ............................................................
$8,590,000 
Bridgeport ........................................................
$16,138,000 
Camp Pendleton ..............................................
$335,080,000 
Coronado ..........................................................
$108,435,000 
Point Mugu ......................................................
$15,377,000 
Twentynine Palms ...........................................
$67,109,000 
Florida ..............
Jacksonville ......................................................
$36,552,000 
Mayport ............................................................
$14,998,000 
Whiting Field ...................................................
$20,620,000 
Georgia .............
Kings Bay .........................................................
$86,063,000 
Hawaii ..............
Barking Sands .................................................
$9,679,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ...................
$7,492,000 
Kaneohe Bay ....................................................
$57,704,000 
Illinois ...............
Great Lakes .....................................................
$91,042,000 
Maryland ..........
Indian Head .....................................................
$67,779,000 
Patuxent River ................................................
$45,844,000 
North Carolina
Camp Lejeune ..................................................
$200,482,000 
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ........
$17,760,000 
New River ........................................................
$78,930,000 
South Carolina
Beaufort ...........................................................
$21,096,000 
Virginia .............
Norfolk .............................................................
$108,228,000 
Portsmouth ......................................................
$74,864,000 
Quantico ...........................................................
$183,690,000 
Washington ......
Bremerton ........................................................
$13,341,000 
Kitsap ...............................................................
$758,842,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
H. R. 1540—370 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain ....................
SW Asia ......................................................
$55,010,000 
Diego Garcia ............
Diego Garcia ...............................................
$35,444,000 
Djibouti ....................
Camp Lemonier ..........................................
$89,499,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family 
housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with respect 
to the construction or improvement of family housing units in 
an amount not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2204 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201(c) of 
that Act (122 Stat. 511) and extended by section 2206 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified ........................
Various .....................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ...............
$2,700,000 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT
FOR CONSISTENCY
IN PROJECT 
AUTHORIZATION DISPLAY.—The table in section 2201(c) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division
H. R. 1540—371 
B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 511) is amended to read as 
follows: 
Navy: Worldwide Unspecified 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified ........................
Various .....................
Wharf Utilities Up-
grade .....................
$8,900,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified ........................
Various .....................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ...............
$2,700,000 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B 
of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that 
Act (122 Stat 4670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, 
or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...........
Marine Corps Base, 
Camp Pendelton ..
Operations Access 
Points, Red Beach ......
$11,970,000 
.............................
Marine Corps Air 
Station, Miramar
Emergency Response 
Station .........................
$6,530,000 
District of Co-
lumbia.
Washington Navy 
Yard ......................
Child Development Cen-
ter ................................
$9,340,000 
SEC. 2207. GUAM REALIGNMENT. 
(a) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in 
subsection (c), notwithstanding any other provision of law, none 
of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act, and 
none of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for 
military construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of 
the Department of Defense, may be obligated to implement the 
realignment of United States Marine Corps forces from Okinawa 
to Guam as envisioned in the United States–Japan Roadmap for 
Realignment Implementation issued May 1, 2006, until— 
(1) the Commandant of the Marine Corps, in consultation 
with the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, 
provides the congressional defense committees the Com-
mandant’s preferred force lay-down for the United States Pacific 
Command Area of Responsibility;
H. R. 1540—372 
(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a master plan for the construction of facili-
ties and infrastructure to execute the Commandant’s preferred 
force lay-down on Guam, including a detailed description of 
costs and a schedule for such construction; 
(3) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional 
defense committees that tangible progress has been made 
regarding the relocation of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma; 
(4) a plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies 
is provided to the congressional defense committees detailing 
descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of 
construction, improvements, and repairs to the non-military 
utilities, facilities, and infrastructure on Guam affected by the 
realignment of forces; and 
(5) the Secretary of Defense— 
(A) submits to the congressional defense committees 
the report on the assessment of the United States force 
posture in East Asia and the Pacific region required under 
section 346 of this Act; or 
(B) certifies to the congressional defense committees 
that the deadline established under such section for the 
submission of such report has not been met. 
(b) DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.— 
(1) AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, if the Secretary of Defense determines that 
any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another 
Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 
2012 under Federal programs administered by agencies other 
than the Department of Defense will result in the development 
(including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improve-
ment, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infra-
structure on Guam, such grant, transfer cooperative agreement, 
or supplemental funding shall be specifically authorized by 
law. 
(2) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘public infrastructure’’ means any utility, method of 
transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control 
of a public entity or State or local government that is used 
by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public. 
(c) EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may use funds described in subsection (a) to 
carry out additional analysis under the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 to include the following actions: 
(1) A re-evaluation of live-fire training range complex alter-
natives, based upon the application of probabilistic modeling; 
and 
(2) The ongoing analysis on the impacts of the realignment 
and build-up on Guam as described in subsection (a) on coral 
reefs in Apra Harbor, Guam. 
SEC. 
2208. 
REDUCTION 
OF 
NAVY 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Navy for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are 
hereby reduced by $25,000,000.
H. R. 1540—373 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
Sec. 2305. Modification of authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 
project. 
Sec. 2306. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project. 
Sec. 2307. Reduction of Air Force military construction authorization. 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the installations or locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ..............................
Eielson AFB ..................................
$45,000,000 
JB Elmendorf-Richardson ...........
$97,000,000 
Arizona .............................
Davis-Monthan AFB ....................
$33,000,000 
Luke AFB ......................................
$24,000,000 
California .........................
Travis AFB ...................................
$22,000,000 
Vandenberg AFB ..........................
$14,200,000 
Colorado ...........................
U.S. Air Force Academy ..............
$13,400,000 
Delaware ..........................
Dover AFB ....................................
$2,800,000 
Kansas .............................
Fort Riley ......................................
$7,600,000 
Louisiana .........................
Barksdale AFB .............................
$23,500,000 
Missouri ...........................
Whiteman AFB .............................
$4,800,000 
North Carolina ................
Pope AFB ......................................
$6,000,000 
North Dakota ..................
Minot AFB ....................................
$67,800,000 
Nebraska .........................
Offutt AFB ....................................
$564,000,000 
New Mexico .....................
Cannon AFB .................................
$22,598,000 
Holloman AFB ..............................
$29,200,000 
Kirtland AFB ................................
$25,000,000 
Nevada .............................
Nellis AFB ....................................
$35,850,000 
Texas ................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...............
$110,000,000 
Utah .................................
Hill AFB ........................................
$16,500,000 
Virginia ............................
JB Langley Eustis ........................
$50,000,000 
Washington ......................
Fairchild AFB ...............................
$27,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table:
H. R. 1540—374 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Greenland ................................
Thule AB ...................................
$28,000,000 
Guam ........................................
Joint Region Marianas ............
$83,600,000 
Germany ..................................
Ramstein AB ............................
$34,697,000 
Italy ..........................................
Sigonella ...................................
$15,000,000 
Korea, Republic Of ..................
Osan AB ....................................
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family 
housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with respect 
to the construction or improvement of family housing units in 
an amount not to exceed $4,208,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2304 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $80,546,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2636) 
for Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, for construction of a Ground 
Control Tower at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may construct 43 vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 
square meters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s 
construction guidelines for control towers, using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations in prior years. 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2009 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—The authorization set forth in the table in 
subsection (b), as provided for by title X of the Supplemental Appro-
priations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) under 
the heading ‘‘MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE’’, shall remain 
in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
H. R. 1540—375 
Air Force: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
Location 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Project 
Amount 
Germany ....
Spangdahlem Air Base 
Child Development Center 
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2307. REDUCTION OF AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Air Force for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 
are hereby reduced by $32,000,000. 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 
defense-wide. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
Sec. 2421. Reduction of Defense Agencies military construction authorization. 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ......................
Anchorage .............................................
$18,400,000 
....................................
Eielson AFB .........................................
$14,800,000 
Alabama ...................
Redstone Arsenal .................................
$58,800,000 
Arizona .....................
Davis-Monthan AFB ............................
$23,000,000 
California .................
Camp Pendleton ...................................
$12,141,000 
....................................
Coronado ...............................................
$42,000,000 
....................................
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ......
$15,500,000 
....................................
San Clemente .......................................
$21,800,000 
Colorado ...................
Buckley AFB ........................................
$140,932,000 
District of Columbia 
Bolling AFB ..........................................
$16,736,000 
Florida ......................
Eglin AFB .............................................
$51,600,000 
....................................
Eglin AUX 9 .........................................
$9,500,000 
....................................
MacDill AFB .........................................
$15,200,000
H. R. 1540—376 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
....................................
Whiting Field .......................................
$3,800,000 
Georgia .....................
Fort Benning ........................................
$37,205,000 
....................................
Fort Gordon ..........................................
$17,705,000 
....................................
Fort Stewart .........................................
$72,300,000 
Hawaii ......................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .......
$14,400,000 
Illinois ......................
Great Lakes ..........................................
$16,900,000 
Kentucky ..................
Fort Campbell ......................................
$138,500,000 
....................................
Fort Knox .............................................
$38,845,000 
Louisiana .................
Barksdale AFB .....................................
$6,200,000 
Massachusetts .........
Hanscom AFB ......................................
$34,040,000 
....................................
Westover ARB ......................................
$23,300,000 
Maryland ...................
Bethesda Naval Hospital ....................
$18,000,000 
....................................
Fort Meade ...........................................
$29,640,000 
....................................
Joint Base Andrews .............................
$265,700,000 
Missouri ...................
Arnold ...................................................
$9,253,000 
Mississippi ...............
Columbus AFB .....................................
$2,600,000 
....................................
Gulfport ................................................
$34,700,000 
North Carolina ........
Camp Lejeune ......................................
$6,670,000 
....................................
Fort Bragg ............................................
$206,274,000 
....................................
New River .............................................
$22,687,000 
....................................
Pope AFB ..............................................
$5,400,000 
New Mexico .............
Cannon AFB .........................................
$132,997,000 
New York .................
Fort Drum ............................................
$20,400,000 
Ohio ..........................
Columbus ..............................................
$10,000,000 
Oklahoma .................
Altus AFB .............................................
$8,200,000 
Pennsylvania ...........
DEF Distribution Depot New Cum-
berland ..............................................
$43,000,000 
....................................
Philadelphia .........................................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ........
Joint Base Charleston .........................
$24,868,000 
Texas .........................
Joint Base San Antonio .......................
$194,300,000 
Virginia ....................
Charlottesville ......................................
$10,805,000 
....................................
Dahlgren ...............................................
$1,988,000 
....................................
Dam Neck .............................................
$23,116,000 
....................................
Fort Belvoir ..........................................
$54,625,000 
....................................
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek 
- Story ................................................
$37,000,000 
....................................
Pentagon ...............................................
$8,742,000 
....................................
Quantico ...............................................
$46,727,000 
Washington ..............
JB Lewis McChord ...............................
$35,000,000 
....................................
Whidbey Island ....................................
$25,000,000 
West Virginia ...........
Camp Dawson ......................................
$2,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ..........................
Ansbach .........................................
$11,672,000 
Baumholder ...................................
$59,419,000 
Grafenwoehr .................................
$6,529,000 
Rhine Ordnance Barracks ...........
$750,000,000
H. R. 1540—377 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States—Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Spangdalem Air Base ...................
$129,043,000 
Stuttgart-Patch Barracks ............
$2,434,000 
Italy .................................
Vicenza ..........................................
$41,864,000 
Japan ...............................
Yokota Air Base ............................
$61,842,000 
United Kingdom .............
Menwith Hill Station ...................
$68,601,000 
Royal Air Force Alconbury ...........
$35,030,000 
SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for energy conservation projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 
chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ...........................
Maxwell AFB .................................
$2,482,000 
Arizona .............................
Davis-Monthan AFB .....................
$4,650,000 
California .........................
Presidio of Monterey .....................
$5,000,000 
...........................................
San Joaquin/Tracy Site .................
$2,860,000 
Colorado ...........................
Fort Carson ....................................
$4,277,000 
Florida ..............................
Tyndall AFB ..................................
$3,255,000 
Georgia .............................
MCLB Albany ................................
$3,504,000 
Kentucky ..........................
Fort Knox .......................................
$2,750,000 
Massachusetts .................
Hanscom AFB ................................
$3,609,000 
New York .........................
Fort Drum ......................................
$3,500,000 
North Carolina ................
Fort Bragg .....................................
$13,400,000 
North Carolina ................
Camp Lejeune ................................
$6,925,000 
Oklahoma .........................
Altus AFB ......................................
$5,700,000 
Tennessee ........................
Arnold AFB ....................................
$3,300,000 
Utah .................................
Tooele Army Depot ........................
$8,200,000 
Virginia ............................
NRO/ADF-E ...................................
$2,000,000 
Wyoming ..........................
FE Warren AFB ............................
$12,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 
and available for energy conservation projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 
chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam .................................
NB Guam ......................................
$17,377,000 
Italy ...................................
NAS Naples ..................................
$2,867,000 
Marshall Islands ..............
Kwajalein Atoll .............................
$6,300,000 
Various Locations .............
Various Locations .........................
$20,444,000
H. R. 1540—378 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for 
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military 
departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall not enter into 
an award for a Replacement of the Wetzel-Smith Elementary School 
project at Baumholder, Germany, until the Secretary completes 
an assessment of United States military force structure in the 
European theater and certifies to the congressional defense commit-
tees that Baumholder, Germany is an enduring location. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILI-
TARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction and 
land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
SEC. 2421. REDUCTION OF DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of Defense (other than the military departments) for fiscal 
years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $131,400,000. 
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 
ORGANIZATION 
SECURITY 
INVEST-
MENT PROGRAM 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as pro-
vided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 
not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 
for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 
previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States
H. R. 1540—379 
Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects 
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program authorized by section 2501, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE 
FORCES FACILITIES 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 
land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
Sec. 2611. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 
Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 
Sec. 2613. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 and 2009 
projects. 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and 
Authorization of Appropriations 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 
and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama .............................
Fort McClellan ...............................
$16,500,000 
Arkansas .............................
Fort Chaffee ...................................
$3,500,000 
Arizona ...............................
Papago Military Reservation ........
$17,800,000 
California ............................
Camp Roberts ................................
$38,160,000 
...............................................
Camp San Luis Obispo .................
$8,000,000 
Colorado ..............................
Alamosa ..........................................
$6,400,000 
...............................................
Aurora ............................................
$3,600,000 
...............................................
Fort Carson ....................................
$43,000,000 
District of Columbia ..........
Anacostia ........................................
$5,300,000 
Florida ................................
Camp Blanding ..............................
$5,500,000 
Georgia ...............................
Atlanta ...........................................
$11,000,000 
...............................................
Hinesville .......................................
$17,500,000 
...............................................
Macon .............................................
$14,500,000 
Hawaii ................................
Kalaeloa .........................................
$33,000,000 
Illinois .................................
Normal ...........................................
$10,000,000 
Indiana ...............................
Camp Atterbury ............................
$81,900,000 
...............................................
Indianapolis ...................................
$25,700,000
H. R. 1540—380 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Massachusetts ....................
Natick .............................................
$9,000,000 
Maryland ............................
Dundalk ..........................................
$16,000,000 
...............................................
La Plata ..........................................
$9,000,000 
...............................................
Westminster ...................................
$10,400,000 
Maine ..................................
Bangor ............................................
$15,600,000 
...............................................
Brunswick ......................................
$23,000,000 
Minnesota ...........................
Camp Ripley ..................................
$8,400,000 
Mississippi ..........................
Camp Shelby ..................................
$64,600,000 
North Carolina ...................
Greensboro .....................................
$3,700,000 
Nebraska ............................
Grand Island ..................................
$22,000,000 
...............................................
Mead ...............................................
$9,100,000 
New Jersey .........................
Lakehurst .......................................
$49,000,000 
New Mexico ........................
Santa Fe .........................................
$5,200,000 
Nevada ................................
Las Vegas .......................................
$23,000,000 
Oklahoma ...........................
Camp Gruber .................................
$13,361,000 
Oregon ................................
The Dalles ......................................
$13,800,000 
South Carolina ...................
Allendale ........................................
$4,300,000 
Utah ....................................
Camp Williams ..............................
$6,500,000 
Virginia ...............................
Fort Pickett ....................................
$11,000,000 
Wisconsin ...........................
Camp Williams ..............................
$7,000,000 
West Virginia .....................
Buckhannon ...................................
$10,000,000 
Wyoming .............................
Cheyenne ........................................
$8,900,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 
and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Puerto Rico .........................
Fort Buchanan ...............................
$57,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Army Reserve 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Fort Hunter Liggett ......................
$5,200,000 
Colorado ..............................
Fort Collins ....................................
$13,600,000 
Illinois .................................
Homewood ......................................
$16,000,000 
Rockford .........................................
$12,800,000 
Indiana ...............................
Fort Benjamin Harrison ...............
$57,000,000
H. R. 1540—385 
to Congress in accordance with section 2914(e) of the Defense 
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 
XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)— 
(A) without regard to any condition contained in that 
recommendation; and 
(B) not later than one year after the completion of 
the chemical demilitarization mission in accordance with 
the Chemical Weapons Convention Treaty. 
(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out the authority provided 
under subsection (a), and any related property management and 
disposal activities, in accordance with the procedures and authori-
ties under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 
SEC. 2704. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION 
INFRASTRUCTURE IN CONSIDERATION AND SELECTION 
OF 
MILITARY 
INSTALLATIONS 
FOR 
CLOSURE 
OR 
REALIGNMENT. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF SELECTION CRITERIA.—Subsection (b)(1) 
of section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘notification an evaluation’’ and inserting 
‘‘notification— 
‘‘(A) an evaluation’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) the criteria used to consider and recommend mili-
tary installations for such closure or realignment, which 
shall include at a minimum consideration of— 
‘‘(i) the ability of the infrastructure (including 
transportation infrastructure) of both the existing and 
receiving communities to support forces, missions, and 
personnel as a result of such closure or realignment; 
and 
‘‘(ii) the costs associated with community transpor-
tation infrastructure improvements as part of the 
evaluation of cost savings or return on investment 
of such closure or realignment; and’’. 
(b) EFFECT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS.—Such section is further 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(f) If the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military 
department concerned determines, pursuant to the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), that 
a significant transportation impact will occur at a result of an 
action described in subsection (a), the action may not be taken 
unless and until the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the 
military department concerned— 
‘‘(1) analyzes the adequacy of transportation infrastructure 
at and in the vicinity of each military installation that would 
be impacted by the action; 
‘‘(2) concludes consultation with the Secretary of Transpor-
tation with regard to such impact; 
‘‘(3) analyzes the impact of the action on local businesses, 
neighborhoods, and local governments; and 
‘‘(4) includes in the notification required by subsection (b)(1) 
a description of how the Secretary intends to remediate the 
significant transportation impact.’’.
H. R. 1540—386 
TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 
Sec. 2801. Prohibition on use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military 
construction and military family housing projects. 
Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military con-
struction projects. 
Sec. 2803. Protections for suppliers of labor and materials under contracts for mili-
tary construction projects and military family housing projects. 
Sec. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and mainte-
nance funds for construction projects outside the United States. 
Sec. 2805. General military construction transfer authority. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 
Sec. 2811. Clarification of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Re-
volving Fund for minor construction and alteration activities at Pen-
tagon Reservation. 
Sec. 2812. Reporting requirements related to the granting of easements. 
Sec. 2813. Limitations on use or development of property in Clear Zone Areas and 
clarification of authority to limit encroachments. 
Sec. 2814. Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities. 
Sec. 2815. Exchange of property at military installations. 
Sec. 2816. Defense access road program enhancements to address transportation 
infrastructure in vicinity of military installations. 
Subtitle C—Energy Security 
Sec. 2821. Consolidation of definitions used in energy security chapter. 
Sec. 2822. Consideration of energy security in developing energy projects on mili-
tary installations using renewable energy sources. 
Sec. 2823. Establishment of interim objective for Department of Defense 2025 re-
newable energy goal. 
Sec. 2824. Use of centralized purchasing agents for renewable energy certificates to 
reduce cost of facility energy projects using renewable energy sources 
and improve efficiencies. 
Sec. 2825. Identification of energy-efficient products for use in construction, repair, 
or renovation of Department of Defense facilities. 
Sec. 2826. Submission of annual Department of Defense energy management re-
ports. 
Sec. 2827. Requirement for Department of Defense to capture and track data gen-
erated in metering Department facilities. 
Sec. 2828. Metering of Navy piers to accurately measure energy consumption. 
Sec. 2829. Training policy for Department of Defense energy managers. 
Sec. 2830. Report on energy-efficiency standards and prohibition on use of funds for 
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum cer-
tification. 
Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 
Sec. 2841. Certification of medical care coverage for H–2B temporary workforce on 
military construction projects on Guam. 
Sec. 2842. Repeal of condition on use of specific utility conveyance authority re-
garding Guam integrated water and wastewater treatment system. 
Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 
Sec. 2851. Land conveyance and exchange, Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alas-
ka. 
Sec. 2852. Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas. 
Sec. 2853. Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana Nui 
areas, Hawaii. 
Sec. 2854. Land exchange, Fort Bliss Texas. 
Sec. 2855. Land conveyance, former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 2861. Redesignation of Industrial College of the Armed Forces as the Dwight 
D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy. 
Sec. 2862. Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as Mike 
O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center.
H. R. 1540—387 
Sec. 2863. Prohibition on naming Department of Defense real property after a 
Member of Congress. 
Sec. 2864. Notifications of reductions in number of members of the Armed Forces 
assigned to permanent duty at a military installation. 
Sec. 2865. Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under juris-
diction of Department of the Navy. 
Sec. 2866. Report on the Homeowners Assistance Program. 
Sec. 2867. Data servers and centers. 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program 
and Military Family Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ANY COST-PLUS SYSTEM OF CON-
TRACTING FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND MILITARY 
FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS. 
(a) PROHIBITION.—Section 2306 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
subsection: 
‘‘(c) A contract entered into by the United States in connection 
with a military construction project or a military family housing 
project may not use any form of cost-plus contracting. This prohibi-
tion is in addition to the prohibition specified in subsection (a) 
on the use of the cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting 
and applies notwithstanding a declaration of war or the declaration 
by the President of a national emergency under section 201 of 
the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1621) that includes the 
use of the armed forces.’’. 
(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c) of section 2306 
of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 
apply with respect to any contract entered into by the United 
States in connection with a military construction project or a mili-
tary family housing project after the date of the enactment of 
this Act. 
SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPEC-
IFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 
(a) SINGLE THRESHOLD FOR USE OF OPERATION AND MAINTE-
NANCE FUNDS.—Subsection (c) of section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘not more than’’ and all that follows through 
the end of the subsection and inserting ‘‘not more than 
$750,000.’’. 
(b) EXTENSION
OF
SPECIAL
LABORATORY
REVITALIZATION 
AUTHORITY.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘February 1, 2010’’ and 
inserting ‘‘February 1, 2014’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2016’’. 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) 
CROSS
REFERENCES
REGARDING
WORKING-CAPITAL 
FUNDS.—Section 2208 of such title is amended— 
(A) in subsection (k)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘section 
2805(c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(c)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (o)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘section 
2805(c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(c)’’.
H. R. 1540—388 
(2) CROSS REFERENCE REGARDING COST AND SCOPE OF WORK 
VARIATIONS.—Section 2853(a) of such title is amended by 
striking ‘‘section 2805(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(a)’’. 
(3) CROSS
REFERENCE
REGARDING
NOTICE
AND
WAIT 
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
RESERVE
PROJECTS.—Section 
18233a(b)(2)(B)(ii) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘section 
2805(a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(a)’’. 
(4) CROSS REFERENCE REGARDING USING OPERATION AND 
MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR SMALL RESERVE PROJECTS.—Section 
18233b of such title is amended by striking ‘‘not more than’’ 
and all that follows through the end of the section and inserting 
‘‘not more than the amount specified in section 2805(c) of this 
title.’’. 
SEC. 2803. PROTECTIONS FOR SUPPLIERS OF LABOR AND MATERIALS 
UNDER 
CONTRACTS 
FOR 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS AND MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS. 
Section 2852 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) In the case of a military construction project or a military 
family housing project, the contract amount thresholds specified 
in subchapter III of chapter 31 of title 40 (commonly referred 
to as the Miller Act) shall be applied by substituting ‘$150,000’ 
for ‘$100,000’ for purposes of determining when a performance 
bond and payment bond are required under section 3131 of such 
title and when alternatives to payment bonds as payment protec-
tions for suppliers of labor and materials are required under section 
3132 of such title.’’. 
SEC. 2804. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHORITY TO USE 
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR CONSTRUC-
TION PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 2808 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently 
amended by section 2804 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 
Stat. 4459), is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’ 
and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’. 
(b) MODIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORTING REQUIREMENT.— 
Subsection (g) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY REPORTS OR’’ in the subsection 
heading; 
(2) by striking ‘‘the report for a fiscal-year quarter under 
subsection (d) or’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘report or’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (a) and (i) of such 
section are amended by striking ‘‘Combined Task Force-Horn of 
Africa’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Combined Joint Task 
Force-Horn of Africa’’.