271 
HR 2864 PCS 
the entrance to the St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, 
Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of $2,000,000. 
SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA. 
The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, 
the removal of the hazard to navigation on the Tanana 
River, Alaska, near the mouth of the Chena River, as de-
scribed in the January 3, 2005, memorandum from the 
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the 
Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska. 
SEC. 5035. VALDEZ, ALASKA. 
The Secretary is authorized to construct a small boat 
harbor in Valdez, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $10,500,000 and an es-
timated non-Federal cost of $9,500,000. 
SEC. 5036. WHITTIER, ALASKA. 
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal 
expense, a study to determine the feasibility of carrying 
out projects for navigation at Whittier, Alaska, to con-
struct a new boat harbor at the head of Whittier Bay and 
to expand the existing harbor and, if the Secretary deter-
mines that a project is feasible, the Secretary may carry 
out the project. 
(b) NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.—The non-Federal 
interest may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds 
provided under any other Federal program to satisfy, in
272 
HR 2864 PCS 
whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the construction 
of any project carried out under this section if such funds 
are authorized to be used to carry out such project. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$35,200,000. 
SEC. 5037. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA. 
(a) GENERAL NAVIGATION FEATURES.—In carrying 
out the project for navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, 
authorized by section 101(b)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the Secretary 
shall consider the dredging of the mooring basin and con-
struction of the inner harbor facilities to be general navi-
gation features for purposes of estimating the non-Federal 
share of project costs. 
(b) REVISION OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.—The 
Secretary shall revise the partnership agreement for the 
project to reflect the change required by subsection (a). 
SEC. 5038. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to 
perform operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of au-
thorized and completed levees on the White River between 
Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas. 
(b) REIMBURSEMENT.—After performing the oper-
ation, maintenance, and rehabilitation under subsection
273 
HR 2864 PCS 
(a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the Sec-
retary of the Interior of an amount equal to the costs allo-
cated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such oper-
ation, maintenance, and rehabilitation. 
SEC. 5039. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall review the project for flood con-
trol, Des Arc, Arkansas, to determine whether bank and 
channel scour along the White River threaten the existing 
project and whether the scour is as a result of a design 
deficiency. If the Secretary determines that such condi-
tions exist as a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall 
carry out measures to eliminate the deficiency. 
SEC. 5040. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage 
in the vicinity of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine 
if the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the damage is the 
result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall 
carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 
111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 
426i). 
SEC. 5041. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MIS-
SOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased sil-
tation and streambank erosion in the St. Francis River
274 
HR 2864 PCS 
Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, to determine if the siltation 
or erosion, or both, are the result of a Federal flood con-
trol project and, if the Secretary determines that the silta-
tion or erosion, or both, are the result of a Federal flood 
control project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to 
mitigate the siltation or erosion, or both. 
SEC. 5042. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS. 
(a) MINIMUM FLOWS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out section 304 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2601), the Secretary shall implement al-
ternatives BS–3 and NF–7, as described in the 
White River Minimum Flows Reallocation Study Re-
port, Arkansas and Missouri, dated July 2004. 
(2) COST
SHARING.—Reallocation of storage 
and installation of facilities under this subsection 
shall be considered fish and wildlife enhancement 
that provides national benefits and shall be a Fed-
eral expense in accordance with section 906(e)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2283(e)(1)). 
(3) OFFSET.—In carrying out this subsection, 
losses to hydropower shall be offset by a reduction, 
not to exceed $17,000,000, in the costs allocated to 
hydropower, as determined by the present value of
275 
HR 2864 PCS 
the estimated replacement cost of the electrical en-
ergy and capacity at the time of the implementation. 
(b) FISH HATCHERY.—In operating the fish hatchery 
at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, authorized by section 105 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 
2921), losses to hydropower shall be offset by a reduction, 
not to exceed $2,200,000, in the costs allocated to hydro-
power, as determined by the present value of the estimated 
replacement cost of the electrical energy and capacity at 
the time of the implementation. 
(c) REPEAL.—Section 374 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 321) is repealed. 
SEC. 5043. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA. 
Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A–220) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘$10,300,000’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$10,300,000’’; 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of 
planning and design work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the
276 
HR 2864 PCS 
Secretary determines that the work is integral 
to the project.’’; and 
(3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) 
of this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
paragraph (2) of this section). 
SEC. 
5044. 
CONTRA 
COSTA 
CANAL, 
OAKLEY 
AND 
KNIGHTSEN, 
CALIFORNIA; 
MALLARD 
SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA. 
Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2650) are each amended 
by adding at the end the following: ‘‘All planning, study, 
design, and construction on the project shall be carried 
out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.’’. 
SEC. 5045. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of 
water quality degradation within Dana Point Harbor, 
California, to determine if the degradation is the result 
of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary de-
termines that the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project 
to mitigate the degradation at Federal expense.
277 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 5046. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$25,000,000’’; 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project (i) the cost of design and construction 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before, on, or after the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary de-
termines that the work is integral to the 
project; and (ii) the cost of provided for the 
project by the non-Federal interest. 
‘‘(C) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—The non- 
Federal interest may provide any portion of the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
the form of in-kind services and materials.’’; 
and 
(3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) 
of this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
paragraph (2) of this section).
278 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 5047. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA. 
Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations 
Act, 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–554; 
114 Stat. 2763A-224) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$28,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘$7,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
SEC. 5048. LA–3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL 
SITE DESIGNATION, CALIFORNIA. 
The third sentence of section 102(c)(4) of the Marine 
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 
U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 
2003’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2007’’. 
SEC. 5049. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA. 
Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended— 
(1) by inserting after ‘‘water’’ the following: 
‘‘and wastewater’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘$14,500,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$24,500,000’’. 
SEC. 5050. ONTARIO AND CHINO, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood dam-
age reduction under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), in the vicinity of Ontario and
279 
HR 2864 PCS 
Chino, California, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible. 
SEC. 5051. PINE FLAT DAM AND RESERVOIR, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall review the 
Kings River Fisheries Management Program Framework 
Agreement, dated May 29, 1999, among the California 
Department of Fish and Game, the Kings River Water 
Association, and the Kings River Conservation District 
and, if the Secretary determines that the management 
program is feasible, the Secretary may participate in the 
management program. 
(b) PROHIBITION.—Nothing in this section author-
izes any project for the raising of, or the construction of, 
a multilevel intake structure at Pine Flat Dam, California. 
(c) USE OF EXISTING STUDIES.—In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent 
practicable, studies in existence on the date of enactment 
of this Act, including data and environmental documenta-
tion in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, Pine Flat 
Dam and Reservoir, Fresno County, California, dated July 
19, 2002. 
(d) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
planning, design, and construction work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership