I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1002 
To restrict any State or local jurisdiction from imposing a new discriminatory 
tax on cell phone services, providers, or property. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 10, 2011 
Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California (for herself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 
SMITH of Texas, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COBLE, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, 
Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. HALL, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. ACKER-
MAN, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. UPTON, Mr. PALLONE, 
Mr. STEARNS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. GUTIERREZ, 
Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON 
of Texas, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 
Mr. ROYCE, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. DOGGETT, 
Mr. DOYLE, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. JONES, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. 
LOBIONDO, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mrs. 
MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PITTS, 
Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 
SESSIONS, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. BONO MACK, Mr. BRADY of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. CHABOT, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. GONZALEZ, 
Mr. HOLT, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. WEINER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. 
CULBERSON, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. 
PLATTS, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. ROSS of Arkan-
sas, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. FORBES, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. SUL-
LIVAN, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 
Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. CARTER, Mr. COLE, Mr. GARRETT, 
Mr. GERLACH, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KLINE, Mr. MUR-
PHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, 
Mr. BARROW, Mr. BOREN, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. COSTA, 
Mr. DENT, Ms. FOXX, Mr. MCCAUL, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 
MACK, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. POE
of Texas, Mr. REICHERT, Ms. 
SCHWARTZ, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. SIRES, Mrs. 
BACHMANN, Mr. HELLER, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. SHULER, 
Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. LATTA, Mr. WITTMAN, 
Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. HARPER, Mr. HUNTER, 
Mr. LANCE, Mr. OLSON, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. 
THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CRITZ, Mr. REED, Mr. 
FITZPATRICK, Mrs. ADAMS, Mr. BARLETTA, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. GOSAR, 
Mr. GRIMM, Mr. HANNA, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. LONG, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Mr. MCKINLEY, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. QUAYLE, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. SMITH of 
New Jersey, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. DANIEL E. LUN-
GREN of California, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. GRIFFIN 
of Arkansas, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To restrict any State or local jurisdiction from imposing 
a new discriminatory tax on cell phone services, pro-
viders, or property. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wireless Tax Fairness 
Act of 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) It is appropriate to exercise congressional 
enforcement authority under section 5 of the 14th 
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
and Congress’ plenary power under article I, section 
8, clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States 
(commonly known as the ‘‘commerce clause’’) in 
order to ensure that States and political subdivisions 
thereof do not discriminate against providers and 
consumers of mobile services by imposing new selec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
tive and excessive taxes and other burdens on such 
providers and consumers. 
(2) In light of the history and pattern of dis-
criminatory taxation faced by providers and con-
sumers of mobile services, the prohibitions against 
and remedies to correct discriminatory State and 
local taxation in section 306 of the Railroad Revital-
ization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (49 
U.S.C. 11501) provide an appropriate analogy for 
congressional action, and similar Federal legislative 
measures are warranted that will prohibit imposing 
new discriminatory taxes on providers and con-
sumers of mobile services and that will assure an ef-
fective, uniform remedy. 
SEC. 3. MORATORIUM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—No State or local jurisdiction shall 
impose a new discriminatory tax on or with respect to mo-
bile services, mobile service providers, or mobile service 
property, during the 5-year period beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 
(1) MOBILE SERVICE.—The term ‘‘mobile serv-
ice’’ means commercial mobile radio service, as such 
term is defined in section 20.3 of title 47, Code of 
Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of en-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
actment of this Act, or any other service that is pri-
marily intended for receipt on, transmission from, or 
use with a mobile telephone or other mobile device, 
including but not limited to the receipt of a digital 
good. 
(2) MOBILE
SERVICE
PROPERTY.—The term 
‘‘mobile service property’’ means all property used 
by a mobile service provider in connection with its 
business of providing mobile services, whether real, 
personal, tangible, or intangible (including goodwill, 
licenses, customer lists, and other similar intangible 
property associated with such business). 
(3) MOBILE
SERVICE
PROVIDER.—The term 
‘‘mobile service provider’’ means any entity that sells 
or provides mobile services, but only to the extent 
that such entity sells or provides mobile services. 
(4) NEW
DISCRIMINATORY
TAX.—The term 
‘‘new discriminatory tax’’ means a tax imposed by a 
State or local jurisdiction that is imposed on or with 
respect to, or is measured by, the charges, receipts, 
or revenues from or value of— 
(A) a mobile service and is not generally 
imposed, or is generally imposed at a lower 
rate, on or with respect to, or measured by, the 
charges, receipts, or revenues from other serv-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
ices or transactions involving tangible personal 
property; 
(B) a mobile service provider and is not 
generally imposed, or is generally imposed at a 
lower rate, on other persons that are engaged 
in businesses other than the provision of mobile 
services; or 
(C) a mobile service property and is not 
generally imposed, or is generally imposed at a 
lower rate, on or with respect to, or measured 
by the value of, other property that is devoted 
to a commercial or industrial use and subject to 
a property tax levy, except public utility prop-
erty owned by a public utility subject to rate of 
return regulation by a State or Federal regu-
latory authority; 
unless such tax was imposed and actually enforced 
on mobile services, mobile service providers, or mo-
bile service property prior to the date of enactment 
of this Act. 
(5) STATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION.—The term 
‘‘State or local jurisdiction’’ means any of the sev-
eral States, the District of Columbia, any territory 
or possession of the United States, a political sub-
division of any State, territory, or possession, or any 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
governmental entity or person acting on behalf of 
such State, territory, possession, or subdivision that 
has the authority to assess, impose, levy, or collect 
taxes or fees. 
(6) TAX.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘tax’’ means 
a charge imposed by a governmental entity for 
the purpose of generating revenues for govern-
mental purposes, and excludes a fee imposed on 
a particular entity or class of entities for a spe-
cific privilege, service, or benefit conferred ex-
clusively on such entity or class of entities. 
(B) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘‘tax’’ does 
not include any fee or charge— 
(i) used to preserve and advance Fed-
eral universal service or similar State pro-
grams authorized by section 254 of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
254); or 
(ii) specifically dedicated by a State or 
local jurisdiction for the support of E–911 
communications systems. 
(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.— 
(1) DETERMINATION.—For purposes of sub-
section (b)(4), all taxes, tax rates, exemptions, de-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
ductions, credits, incentives, exclusions, and other 
similar factors shall be taken into account in deter-
mining whether a tax is a new discriminatory tax. 
(2) APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES.—Except as 
otherwise provided in this Act, in determining 
whether a tax on mobile service property is a new 
discriminatory tax for purposes of subsection 
(b)(4)(A)(iii), principles similar to those set forth in 
section 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regu-
latory Reform Act of 1976 (49 U.S.C. 11501) shall 
apply. 
(3) EXCLUSIONS.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this Act— 
(A) the term ‘‘generally imposed’’ as used 
in subsection (b)(4) shall not apply to any tax 
imposed only on— 
(i) specific services; 
(ii) specific industries or business seg-
ments; or 
(iii) specific types of property; and 
(B) the term ‘‘new discriminatory tax’’ 
shall not include a new tax or the modification 
of an existing tax that— 
(i) replaces one or more taxes that 
had been imposed on mobile services, mo-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
bile service providers, or mobile service 
property; and 
(ii) is designed so that, based on in-
formation available at the time of the en-
actment of such new tax or such modifica-
tion, the amount of tax revenues generated 
thereby with respect to such mobile serv-
ices, mobile service providers, or mobile 
service property is reasonably expected to 
not exceed the amount of tax revenues that 
would have been generated by the respec-
tive replaced tax or taxes with respect to 
such mobile services, mobile service pro-
viders, or mobile service property. 
SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT. 
Notwithstanding any provision of section 1341 of title 
28, United States Code, or the constitution or laws of any 
State, the district courts of the United States shall have 
jurisdiction, without regard to amount in controversy or 
citizenship of the parties, to grant such mandatory or pro-
hibitive injunctive relief, interim equitable relief, and de-
claratory judgments as may be necessary to prevent, re-
strain, or terminate any acts in violation of this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(1) JURISDICTION.—Such jurisdiction shall not 
be exclusive of the jurisdiction which any Federal or 
State court may have in the absence of this section. 
(2) BURDEN OF PROOF.—The burden of proof 
in any proceeding brought under this Act shall be 
upon the party seeking relief and shall be by a pre-
ponderance of the evidence on all issues of fact. 
(3) RELIEF.—In granting relief against a tax 
which is discriminatory or excessive under this Act 
with respect to tax rate or amount only, the court 
shall prevent, restrain, or terminate the imposition, 
levy, or collection of not more than the discrimina-
tory or excessive portion of the tax as determined by 
the court. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:42 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1002.IH
H1002
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS