SEC. 3008. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND 
TEXAS. 
Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1213) is amended by striking 
‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 
SEC. 3009. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF 
COLUMBIA. 
The project for flood control, Potomac River, Wash-
ington, District of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of 
the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688; 49 Stat. 1574) 
and modified by section 301(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3707) and section 
309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 301), is further modified to authorize the Sec-
retary to construct the project at a Federal cost of 
$8,100,000, in accordance with the post authorization 
change report dated June 29, 1998. 
SEC. 3010. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FLORIDA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Kissimmee 
River Restoration, Florida, authorized by section 101(8) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4802), is modified to authorize the Secretary to con-
struct the project at a total cost of $852,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $426,000,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $426,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3011. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLORIDA. 
The project for navigation and related purposes, 
Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, authorized 
by section 101(b)(8) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$8,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$6,500,000. 
SEC. 3012. SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GEORGIA. 
The project for navigation, Savannah Harbor expan-
sion, Georgia, authorized by section 101(b)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
279), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $675,000,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $405,000,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $270,000,000. 
SEC. 3013. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DIS-
PERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, ILLINOIS. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 3061(b)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 
1121) is amended— 
(1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier 
I in its current location or at an alternative lo-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
cation, as determined appropriate by the Sec-
retary;’’; 
(2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘June 14, 
2005’’ and inserting ‘‘November 21, 2003, as 
amended on July 14, 2005’’; 
(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), 
and (E) as subparagraphs (D), (E) and (F), respec-
tively; 
(4) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(C) acquire real estate interests necessary 
for the construction, operation, and mainte-
nance of Barrier I and Barrier II;’’; 
(5) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara-
graph (E) (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
subsection); 
(6) by striking the period at the end of sub-
paragraph (F) (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of 
this subsection) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(7) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(G) construct additional barriers or other 
fish deterrents at other locations in the vicinity 
of the Chicago Area Waterway System, if deter-
mined appropriate by the Secretary.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(b) USE OF CREDIT.—Section 3061(b)(2) of such Act 
(121 Stat. 1121) is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph 
(1)(E)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)(F)’’. 
(c) FEASIBILITY STUDY.—Section 3061(d) of such 
Act (121 Stat. 1121) is amended by adding the end the 
following: ‘‘The study shall include a fully developed anal-
ysis of an alternative for hydrologic separation between 
the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basins. The hy-
drologic separation alternative shall include identification 
of measures to prevent the transfer of aquatic nuisance 
species between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River 
basins through surface water.’’. 
SEC. 3014. LOWER OHIO RIVER, ILLINOIS AND KENTUCKY. 
The project for navigation, Lower Ohio River, Locks 
and Dams 52 and 53, Illinois and Kentucky, authorized 
by section 3(a)(6) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$1,991,000,000. 
SEC. 3015. WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, 
MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River 
Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois, 
authorized by section 1001(20) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1053), is modified 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
total cost of $120,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $78,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$42,000,000. 
SEC. 3016. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA. 
The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, 
Indiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1996 (100 Stat. 4115) and 
modified by section 127 of the Energy and Water Appro-
priations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
total cost of $275,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $206,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$69,000,000. 
SEC. 3017. RHODES POINT JETTY, SMITH ISLAND, MARY-
LAND. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for navigation, Rhodes Point 
Jetty, Smith Island, Maryland, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), shall be $7,000,000. 
SEC. 3018. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MAS-
SACHUSETTS. 
Section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656) is amended by striking ‘‘draft 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
evaluation report of the New England District Engineer 
entitled ‘Phase I Muddy River Master Plan’, dated June 
2000’’ and inserting ‘‘Final Decision Document and Envi-
ronmental Assessment Report of the New England Dis-
trict Engineer entitled ‘Muddy River Flood Control and 
Ecosystem Restoration, Boston and Brookline, Massachu-
setts’, dated September 2003, at a total cost of 
$79,200,000’’. 
SEC. 3019. ADA, MINNESOTA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for flood damage reduction, Wild 
Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried out under sec-
tion 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s), shall be $10,600,000. 
SEC. 3020. MONTEVIDEO, MINNESOTA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for flood damage reduction, Mon-
tevideo, Minnesota, being carried out under section 205 
of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall 
be $10,000,000. 
SEC. 3021. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA. 
Section 3101(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1133) is amended by striking 
‘‘$7,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$14,000,000’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3022. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. 
The project for flood control, Blue River basin, Kan-
sas City, Missouri, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $45,500,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $34,125,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal cost of $11,375,000. 
SEC. 3023. LOWER ASSUNPINK CREEK, TRENTON, NEW JER-
SEY. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Lower Assunpink Creek, Trenton, 
New Jersey, being carried out under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), shall be $10,000,000. 
SEC. 3024. OCEAN GATE, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for emergency streambank pro-
tection, Ocean Gate, Ocean County, New Jersey, being 
carried out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), shall be $4,500,000. 
SEC. 3025. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK. 
Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781), as amended by section 3122 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Stat. 
1139), 
is 
further 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$27,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3026. SPRING CREEK, NEW YORK. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Spring Creek, New York, being car-
ried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall be 
$6,000,000. 
SEC. 3027. HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OHIO. 
Section 1001(37)(B)(iii) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1055) is amended by 
striking ‘‘$1,270,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3028. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER AND TILLAMOOK BAY 
ECOSYSTEM 
RESTORATION, 
OREGON 
AND 
WASHINGTON. 
Section 536(g) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2662) is amended by striking 
‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3029. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS 
CHRISTI, TEXAS. 
The project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, 
Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, authorized by section 
1001(40) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (121 Stat. 1056) is modified to authorize the Sec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
retary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$447,604,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$183,827,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$263,777,000. 
SEC. 3030. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS. 
The project for flood control, Trinity River and tribu-
taries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled 
‘‘An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preser-
vation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
for other purposes’’, approved March 2, 1945, and modi-
fied by section 5141 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1253), is further modified to au-
thorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $882,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$573,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$308,700,000. 
SEC. 3031. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, 
TEXAS. 
The project for navigation and environmental restora-
tion, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, au-
thorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to extend the boundaries of the 
Galveston channel approximately 2600 feet beyond Pier 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
38, if the Secretary determines that the extension is fea-
sible. 
SEC. 3032. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS. 
The following project may be carried out by the Sec-
retary and no construction on any such project may be 
initiated until the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible: The Vincennes, Indiana portion of the project 
for flood control, Wabash River basin, Illinois and Indi-
ana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (60 Stat. 649) and deauthorized by section 1002 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4209). 
SEC. 3033. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The following projects are not au-
thorized after the date of enactment of this Act: 
(1) POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON CHANNEL, 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.—The portion of the project 
for navigation, Potomac River, Washington Channel, 
District of Columbia, authorized by the Act of Au-
gust 30, 1935 (chapter 831; 49 Stat. 1028), begin-
ning at Washington Harbor Channel Geometry Cen-
terline of the 400-foot-wide main navigational ship 
channel, Centerline Station No. 103+73.12, coordi-
nates North 441,948.20, East 1,303,969.30, as stat-
ed and depicted on the Condition Survey Anacostia, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Virginia, Washington and Magazine Bar Shoal 
Channels, Washington, D.C., Sheet 6 of 6, prepared 
by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bal-
timore district, July 2007; thence departing the 
aforementioned centerline traveling the following 
courses and distances: N. 40 degrees 10 minutes 45 
seconds E., 200.00 feet to a point, on the outline of 
said 400-foot-wide channel thence binding on said 
outline the following three courses and distances: S. 
49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds E., 1,507.86 feet 
to a point, thence; S. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 sec-
onds E., 2,083.17 feet to a point, thence; S. 11 de-
grees 27 minutes 04 seconds E., 363.00 feet to a 
point, thence; S. 78 degrees 32 minutes 56 seconds 
W., 200.00 feet to a point binding on the centerline 
of the 400-foot-wide main navigational channel at 
computed Centerline Station No. 65+54.31, coordi-
nates North 438,923.9874, East 1,306,159.9738, 
thence; continuing with the aforementioned center-
line the following courses and distances: N. 11 de-
grees 27 minutes 04 seconds W., 330.80 feet to a 
point, Centerline Station No. 68+85.10, thence; N. 
29 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds W., 2,015.56 feet 
to a point, Centerline Station No. 89+00.67, thence; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
N. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds W., 1,472.26 
feet to the point of beginning. 
(2) CHICAGO HARBOR, ILLINOIS.—The portion 
of the project for navigation, Chicago Harbor, au-
thorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 
1899 and March 2, 1919, beginning at the south-
west corner of Metropolitan Sanitary District of 
Greater Chicago sluice gate that abuts the north 
wall of the Chicago River Lock thence running north 
for approximately 290 feet, thence running east ap-
proximately 1,000 feet, thence running south ap-
proximately 290 feet, thence running west approxi-
mately 1,000 feet to the point of origin. 
(3) IPSWICH
RIVER, 
MASSACHUSETTS.—The 
portion of the project for navigation, Ipswich River, 
Massachusetts, adopted by the Rivers and Harbors 
Act of August 5, 1886, consisting of a 4-foot chan-
nel located at the entrance to the inner harbor at 
Ipswich Harbor, lying northwesterly of a line com-
mencing at: N3,074,938.09, E837,154.87, thence 
running easterly approximately 60 feet to a point 
with coordinates N3,074,972.62, E837,203.93. 
(4) MENEMSHA CREEK, MASSACHUSETTS.—The 
portion of the project for navigation, Menemsha 
Creek, Massachusetts, authorized by the River and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Harbor Act of 1945, consisting of the following 
areas— 
(A) beginning at a point, N129,112.54, 
E1,566,926.30, running north 52 degrees 12 
minutes 55.9 seconds east 208.68 feet to a 
point N129,240.39, E1,567,091.22, running 
south 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 seconds east 
170.0 
feet 
to 
a 
point 
N129,203.51, 
E1,567,257.17, running south 37 degrees 25 
minutes 45.4 seconds east 101.04 feet to a 
point N129,123.28, E1,567,318.58, running 
north 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 seconds west 
223.32 feet to a point N129,171.72, E 
1,567,100.58, running south 52 degrees 12 
minutes 55.9 seconds west 174.00 feet to a 
point N129,065.12, E1,566,963.06, running 
north 37 degrees 47 minutes 04.1 seconds west 
60.00 feet to the point of origin, and 
(B) beginning at a point, N128,895.78, 
E1,566,940.39, thence running north 52 de-
grees 31 minutes 25.8 seconds east 135.91 feet 
to a point N128,978.47, E1,567,048.25, thence 
running south 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 sec-
onds east 80.63 feet to a point N128,960.98, 
E1,567,126.96, thence running south 37 de-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS