HR 1469 RH
‘‘Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense,
1996/1997’’, $160,000.
(RESCISSIONS)
SEC. 2204. Of the funds provided in previous Depart-
ment of Defense Appropriations Acts, funds are hereby
rescinded from the following accounts in the specified
amounts:
‘‘Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, 1994/
1998’’, $28,700,000;
‘‘Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, 1995/1997’’,
$14,400,000;
‘‘Missile Procurement, Air Force, 1995/1997’’,
$4,000,000;
‘‘Aircraft Procurement, Army, 1996/1998’’,
$18,000,000;
‘‘Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat
Vehicles, Army, 1996/1998’’, $26,000,000;
‘‘Procurement of Ammunition, Army, 1996/
1998’’, $34,000,000;
‘‘Other 
Procurement, 
Navy, 
1996/1998’’,
$3,000,000;
‘‘Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, 1996/1998’’,
$52,000,000;
‘‘Other Procurement, Air Force, 1996/1998’’,
$10,000,000;
HR 1469 RH
‘‘Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force, 1996/
1998’’, $21,100,000;
‘‘Procurement, 
Defense-Wide, 
1996/1998’’,
$34,800,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Navy, 1996/1997’’, $4,500,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Air Force, 1996/1997’’, $2,000,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Defense-Wide, 1996/1997’’, $71,200,000;
‘‘Developmental Test and Evaluation, Defense,
1996/1997’’, $12,200,000;
‘‘Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction,
Defense, 1996/1998’’, $22,000,000;
‘‘National 
Guard 
Personnel, 
Air 
Force’’,
$7,600,000;
‘‘Operation 
and 
Maintenance, 
Army’’,
$17,000,000;
‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’,
$10,000,000;
‘‘Procurement of Ammunition, Army, 1997/
1999’’, $10,000,000;
‘‘Other 
Procurement, 
Army, 
1997/1999’’,
$6,000,000;
HR 1469 RH
‘‘Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 1997/1999’’,
$48,000,000;
‘‘Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, 1997/1999’’,
$35,000,000;
‘‘Missile Procurement, Air Force, 1997/1999’’,
$120,000,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Army, 1997/1998’’, $15,000,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Navy, 1997/1998’’, $28,500,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Air Force, 1997/1998’’, $237,500,000;
‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Defense-Wide, 1997/1998’’, $100,000,000.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
(RESCISSIONS)
SEC. 2205. Of the funds appropriated in the Military
Construction Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public Law 104–
32), amounts are hereby rescinded from the following ac-
counts in the specified amounts:
‘‘Military Construction, Air Force Reserve’’,
$5,000,000;
‘‘Military 
Construction, 
Defense-wide’’,
$41,000,000;
HR 1469 RH
‘‘Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part
II’’, $35,391,000;
‘‘Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part
III’’, $75,638,000; and
‘‘Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part
IV’’, $22,971,000.
CHAPTER 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVY
(RESCISSION)
SEC. 2301. Of the funds appropriated for ‘‘Military
Construction, Navy’’ under Public Law 103–307,
$6,480,000 is hereby rescinded.
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
SEC. 2302. For an additional amount for ‘‘Family
Housing, Navy and Marine Corps’’ to cover the incremen-
tal Operation and Maintenance costs arising from hurri-
cane damage to family housing units at Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and Marine Corps
Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, $6,480,000, as
authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2854.
HR 1469 RH
TITLE III
GENERAL PROVISIONS—THIS ACT
SEC. 3001. No part of any appropriation contained
in this Act shall remain available for obligation beyond
the current fiscal year unless expressly so provided herein.
ASSISTANCE TO UKRAINE
SEC. 3002. (a) The President may waive any of the
earmarks contained in subsections (k) and (l) under the
heading ‘‘Assistance for the New Independent States of
the Former Soviet Union’’ contained in the Foreign Oper-
ations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appro-
priations Act, 1997, as included in Public Law 104–208,
if he determines, and so reports to the Committees on Ap-
propriations that the Government of Ukraine—
(1) is not making significant progress toward
economic reform and the elimination of corruption;
(2) is not permitting American firms and indi-
viduals to operate in Ukraine according to generally
accepted business principles; or
(3) is not effectively assisting American firms
and individuals in their efforts to enforce commercial
contracts and resist extortion and other corrupt de-
mands.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘1997 Emergency Sup-
plemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from Natural