120
value that is comparable to action described in
subparagraph (A).
‘‘(31) BROAD MULTIPLE BID.—The term ‘broad
multiple bid’ means a bid in which the proposed
buyer extends an invitation to at least all the produc-
ers in the industry known by the buyer to be capable
of building the subject vessel.’’.
SEC. 102. ENFORCEMENT OF COUNTERMEASURES.
Part II of title IV of the Tariff Act of 1930 is amended
by adding at the end the following:
‘‘SEC. 
468. 
SHIPBUILDING 
AGREEMENT 
COUNTER-
MEASURES.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, upon receiving from the Secretary of Commerce
a list of vessels subject to countermeasures under section
807, the Customs Service shall deny any request for a per-
mit to lade or unlade passengers, merchandise, or baggage
from or onto those vessels so listed.
‘‘(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not be applied
to deny a permit for the following:
‘‘(1) To unlade any United States citizen or per-
manent legal resident alien from a vessel included in
the list described in subsection (a), or to unlade any
refugee or any alien who would otherwise be eligible
121
to apply for asylum and withholding of deportation
under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
‘‘(2) To lade or unlade any crewmember of such
vessel.
‘‘(3) To lade or unlade coal and other fuel sup-
plies (for the operation of the listed vessel), ships’
stores, sea stores, and the legitimate equipment of
such vessel.
‘‘(4) To lade or unlade supplies for the use or
sale on such vessel.
‘‘(5) To lade or unlade such other merchandise,
baggage, or passenger as the Customs Service shall de-
termine necessary to protect the immediate health,
safety, or welfare of a human being.
‘‘(c) CORRECTION OF MINISTERIAL OR CLERICAL ER-
RORS.—
‘‘(1) PETITION FOR CORRECTION.—If the master
of any vessel whose application for a permit to lade
or unlade has been denied under this section believes
that such denial resulted from a ministerial or cleri-
cal error, not amounting to a mistake of law, commit-
ted by any Customs officer, the master may petition
the Customs Service for correction of such error, as
provided by regulation.
122
‘‘(2) INAPPLICABILITY
OF
SECTIONS
514
AND
520.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), imposition of
countermeasures under this section shall not be
deemed an exclusion or other protestable decision
under section 514, and shall not be subject to correc-
tion under section 520.
‘‘(3) PETITIONS SEEKING ADMINISTRATIVE RE-
VIEW.—Any petition seeking administrative review of
any matter regarding the Secretary of Commerce’s de-
cision to list a vessel under section 807 must be
brought under that section.
‘‘(d) PENALTIES.—In addition to any other provision
of law, the Customs Service may impose a civil penalty of
not to exceed $10,000 against the master of any vessel—
‘‘(1) who submits false information in requesting
any permit to lade or unlade; or
‘‘(2) who attempts to, or actually does, lade or
unlade in violation of any denial of such permit
under this section.’’.
SEC. 103. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INJURIOUS PRICING AND
COUNTERMEASURE PROCEEDINGS.
(a) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—Part III of title IV of the Tar-
iff Act of 1930 is amended by inserting after section 516A
the following:
123
‘‘SEC. 516B. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INJURIOUS PRICING AND
COUNTERMEASURE PROCEEDINGS.
‘‘(a) REVIEW OF DETERMINATION.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Within 30 days after the
date of publication in the Federal Register of—
‘‘(A)(i) a determination by the administer-
ing authority under section 802(c) not to initiate
an investigation,
‘‘(ii) a negative determination by the Com-
mission under section 803(a) as to whether there
is or has been reasonable indication of material
injury, threat of material injury, or material re-
tardation,
‘‘(iii) a determination by the administering
authority to suspend or revoke an injurious pric-
ing order under section 806(d) or (e),
‘‘(iv) a determination by the administering
authority under section 807(c),
‘‘(v) a determination by the administering
authority in a review under section 807(d),
‘‘(vi) a determination by the administering
authority concerning whether to extend the scope
or duration of a countermeasure order under sec-
tion 807(e)(3)(B)(ii),
124
‘‘(vii) a determination by the administering
authority to amend a countermeasure order
under section 807(e)(6),
‘‘(viii) a determination by the administer-
ing authority in a review under section 807(g),
‘‘(ix) a determination by the administering
authority under section 807(i) to terminate pro-
ceedings, or to amend or revoke a counter-
measure order,
‘‘(x) a determination by the administering
authority under section 845(b), with respect to a
matter described in paragraph (1)(D) of that
section, or
‘‘(B)(i) an injurious pricing order based on
a determination described in subparagraph (A)
of paragraph (2),
‘‘(ii) notice of a determination described in
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2),
‘‘(iii) notice of implementation of a deter-
mination described in subparagraph (C) of para-
graph (2), or
‘‘(iv) notice of revocation of an injurious
pricing order based on a determination described
in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2),