datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
HR 2578 RFS
Alaska Natives to land historically used by Alaska 
Natives for traditional, cultural, and spiritual pur-
poses; and 
(B) that Act declared that the land settlement 
‘‘should be accomplished rapidly, with certainty, in 
conformity with the real economic and social needs 
of Natives’’; 
(2) the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
(43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)— 
(A) authorized the distribution of approxi-
mately $1,000,000,000 and 44,000,000 acres of 
land to Alaska Natives; and 
(B) provided for the establishment of Na-
tive Corporations to receive and manage the 
funds and that land to meet the cultural, social, 
and economic needs of Native shareholders; 
(3) under section 12 of the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1611), each Re-
gional Corporation, other than Sealaska (the Re-
gional Corporation for southeast Alaska), was au-
thorized to receive a share of land based on the pro-
portion that the number of Alaska Native share-
holders residing in the region of the Regional Cor-
poration bore to the total number of Alaska Native 
shareholders, or the relative size of the area to which 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
05:12 Jun 21, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2578.RFS
H2578
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2216
To provide that a State may not take into account income from sources
outside the State in determining the amount of tax imposed on the
income of nonresidents.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 20, 1993
Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide that a State may not take into account income
from sources outside the State in determining the
amount of tax imposed on the income of nonresidents.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) chapter 4 of title 4, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end thereof the following new
section:
‘‘§ 114. Limitation on taxation of nonresidents
‘‘(a) In determining the amount of income tax im-
posed by a State (or political subdivision thereof) on an
individual for any period during which such individual is
not a resident or domiciliary of such State, such State (or
political subdivision) shall not take into account any in-
come from sources outside such State.
‘‘(b) For purposes of subsection (a)—
‘‘(1) the term ‘State’ includes the District of
Columbia, and
‘‘(2) the term ‘income tax’ has the meaning
given to such term by section 110(c) of this title.’’
(b) The analysis of chapter 4 of title 4, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow-
ing new item:
‘‘114. Limitation on taxation of nonresidents.’’
(c) The amendments made by this section shall apply
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.
Æ
IB 
Union Calendar No. 203 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2578 
[Report No. 112–303] 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act related to a segment of the 
Lower Merced River in California, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 18, 2011 
Mr. DENHAM (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. COSTA, and Mr. MCCARTHY of 
California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Natural Resources 
DECEMBER 1, 2011 
Additional sponsor: Mr. CARDOZA 
DECEMBER 1, 2011 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:15 Dec 01, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2578.RH
H2578
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. LOWER MERCED RIVER. 
(a) WILD
AND
SCENIC
RIVERS
ACT.—Section 
3(a)(62)(B)(i) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)(62)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘the normal maximum’’ the first 
place that it appears and all that follows through 
‘‘April, 1990.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘the 
boundary of FERC Project No. 2179 as it existed 
on July 18, 2011, consisting of a point approxi-
mately 2,480 feet downstream of the confluence with 
the North Fork of the Merced River, consisting of 
approximately 7.4 miles.’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘the normal maximum operating 
pool water surface level of Lake McClure’’ the sec-
ond time that it occurs and inserting ‘‘the boundary 
of FERC Project No. 2179 as it existed on July 18, 
2011, consisting of a point approximately 2,480 feet 
downstream of the confluence with the North Fork 
of the Merced River’’. 
(b) EXCHEQUER PROJECT.—Section 3 of Public Law 
102–432 is amended by striking ‘‘Act:’’ and all that fol-
lows through the period and inserting ‘‘Act.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:15 Dec 01, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2578.RH
H2578
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 203 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 2578 
[Report No. 112–303] 
A BILL 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act related 
to a segment of the Lower Merced River in Cali-
fornia, and for other purposes. 
DECEMBER 1, 2011 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:15 Dec 01, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H2578.RH
H2578
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2579 
To require the Corps of Engineers to take into account all available hydrologic 
data in conducting Missouri River basin operations. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 18, 2011 
Ms. JENKINS (for herself and Mr. TERRY) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To require the Corps of Engineers to take into account 
all available hydrologic data in conducting Missouri River 
basin operations. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF ALL AVAILABLE HYDRO-
LOGIC DATA. 
Effective beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 
of Engineers, shall take into account all available hydro-
logic data in conducting Missouri River basin operations. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:01 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2579.IH
H2579
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2581 
To provide that the public debt limit shall not affect timely payment in 
full of Social Security benefits. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 18, 2011 
Mr. POSEY (for himself, Mr. WEBSTER, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. AUSTIN 
SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. LATTA, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, and Mr. 
FARENTHOLD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To provide that the public debt limit shall not affect timely 
payment in full of Social Security benefits. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Check 
Guarantee Act of 2011’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:02 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2581.IH
H2581
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. TIMELY PAYMENT IN FULL OF SOCIAL SECURITY 
BENEFITS NOTWITHSTANDING THE PUBLIC 
DEBT LIMIT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in section 3101 of title 
31, United States Code, shall be construed to have the 
effect of— 
(1) precluding or otherwise limiting timely re-
demption of obligations owed to the Federal Old-Age 
and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund or the Federal 
Disability Insurance Trust Fund to the extent nec-
essary to provide for timely payment in full of bene-
fits payable from such Trust Funds, or 
(2) otherwise precluding or limiting timely pay-
ment in full of benefits payable from such Trust 
Funds. 
(b) OPERATION OF THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT IN 
OTHER RESPECTS.—In applying the limitation on public 
debt under section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, 
subsection (a) shall be taken into account before applying 
such limitation to any other matter affected by such sec-
tion. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:02 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2581.IH
H2581
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
The jury, or if there is no jury, the court, shall consider
whether any other aspect of the defendant’s background,
character or record or any other circumstance of the of-
fense that the defendant may proffer as a mitigating fac-
tor exists.
‘‘(b) AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR ESPIONAGE AND
TREASON.—In determining whether a sentence of death
is justified for an offense described in section 3591(1), the
jury, or if there is no jury, the court, shall consider each
of the following aggravating factors and determine which,
if any, exist:
‘‘(1) PREVIOUS ESPIONAGE OR TREASON CON-
VICTION.—The defendant has previously been con-
victed of another offense involving espionage or trea-
son for which a sentence of life imprisonment or
death was authorized by statute.
‘‘(2) RISK OF SUBSTANTIAL DANGER TO NA-
TIONAL SECURITY.—In the commission of the of-
fense the defendant knowingly created a grave risk
to the national security.
‘‘(3) RISK
OF
DEATH
TO
ANOTHER.—In the
commission of the offense the defendant knowingly
created a grave risk of death to another person.
The jury, or if there is no jury, the court, may consider
whether any other aggravating factor exists.
‘‘(1) PREVIOUS CONVICTION OF OFFENSE FOR
WHICH A SENTENCE OF DEATH OR LIFE IMPRISON-
MENT WAS AUTHORIZED.—The defendant has pre-
viously been convicted of another Federal or State
offense resulting in the death of a person, for which
a sentence of life imprisonment or death was author-
ized by statute.
‘‘(2) PREVIOUS CONVICTION OF OTHER SERI-
OUS OFFENSES.—The defendant has previously been
convicted of two or more Federal or State offenses,
each punishable by a term of imprisonment of more
than one year, committed on different occasions, in-
volving the importation, manufacture, or distribution
of a controlled substance (as defined in section 102
of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802))
or the infliction of, or attempted infliction of, serious
bodily injury or death upon another person.
‘‘(3) PREVIOUS SERIOUS DRUG FELONY CONVIC-
TION.—The defendant has previously been convicted
of another Federal or State offense involving the
manufacture, distribution, importation, or possession
of a controlled substances (as defined in section 102
of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802))
for which a sentence of five or more years of impris-
onment was authorized by statute.
any parent under this section for any academic year
in excess of (A) the student’s estimated cost of at-
tendance, minus (B) other financial aid as certified
by 
the 
eligible 
institution 
under 
section
428(a)(2)(A). The annual insurable limit on account
of any student shall not be deemed to be exceeded
by a line of credit under which actual payments to
the borrower will not be made in any year in excess
of the annual limit.’’.
(b) MULTIPLE DISBURSEMENT REQUIRED.—
(1) AMENDMENT.—Section 428B(c) of the Act
is amended by inserting after ‘‘under this section’’
the following: ‘‘shall be disbursed in accordance with
the requirements of section 428G and’’.
(2) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Section
428G(e) of the Act (20 U.S.C. 1078–7(e) is amend-
ed—
(A) by striking ‘‘PLUS, CONSOLIDATION,’’
and inserting ‘‘CONSOLIDATION’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘section 428B or 428C’’
and inserting ‘‘section 428C’’.
(3) FISL AMENDMENT.—Section 427(b)(2) of
the Act (20 U.S.C. 1077(b)(2)) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘section 428B or 428C’’ and inserting ‘‘section
428B’’.
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2218
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure
that students are counted by using data from local educational agencies
when available.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 20, 1993
Mr. GOODLING (for himself, Mr. FORD of Michigan, Mr. KILDEE, and Mr.
GUNDERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
of 1965 to ensure that students are counted by using
data from local educational agencies when available.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as ‘‘Concentration Grant
Targeting and Improvements Act’’.
‘‘(B) The term ‘eligible advisory entity’
means an entity meeting the requirements
under paragraph (8)(A).
‘‘(C) The term ‘eligible entity’ means an
entity described under paragraph (2)(A).
‘‘(D) The term ‘federally assisted low-in-
come housing’ has the meaning given the term
in section 5126 of the Public and Assisted
Housing Drug Elimination Act of 1990.
‘‘(13) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
There are authorized to be appropriated—
‘‘(A) for grants under paragraph (1)(A),
$2,650,000 in each of fiscal years 1994 and
1995;
‘‘(B) for technical assistance grants under
paragraph (1)(B), $100,000 in each of fiscal
years 1994 and 1995; and
‘‘(C) for a study grant under paragraph
(11), $250,000 in fiscal year 1994.’’.
SEC. 3. PUBLIC HOUSING MIDNIGHT BASKETBALL LEAGUE
PROGRAMS.
Section 520(c) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Af-
fordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C 11903a(c)) is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES WITH
ESPECIALLY 
HIGH 
CONCENTRATIONS 
OF
CHILDREN FROM LOW-INCOME FAMILIES.
Section 1006 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu-
cation Act of 1965 is amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘IN
COUNTIES’’;
(2) in subsection (a)(1)(A)—
(A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by
striking ‘‘county’’ and inserting ‘‘local edu-
cational agency’’;
(B) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘in such
county’’; and
(C) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘of local edu-
cational agencies in such county’’ and inserting
‘‘of such local educational agencies’’;
(3) in subsection (a)(2)—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A), by striking ‘‘county in which there are local
educational agencies’’ and inserting ‘‘local edu-
cational agency’’;
(B) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘of
a county which qualifies’’ and inserting ‘‘which
qualify’’; and
(C) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking
‘‘in a county which qualifies’’ and inserting
‘‘which qualify’’;
(4) in subsection (a)(3)—
(A) by striking ‘‘county’’ each place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘local educational agency’’;
and
(B) by striking ‘‘counties’’ and inserting
‘‘local educational agencies’’;
(5) in subsection (a)(4)—
(A) by striking ‘‘any county’’ and inserting
‘‘any local educational agency’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘of local educational agen-
cies in such county’’ and inserting ‘‘of such
local educational agencies’’; and
(C) by striking ‘‘for such county’’ and in-
serting ‘‘for such local educational agency’’;
(6) in subsection (a)(5), to read as follows:
‘‘(5) In States which receive the minimum
grant amount under paragraph (1), the State edu-
cational agency shall allocate such funds among the
local educational agencies in such State in rank
order of their respective concentration and numbers
of children from low-income families and in amounts
which are consistent with the degree of concentra-
tion of poverty, except that only those local edu-
cational agencies with concentrations of poverty that
exceed the statewide average of poverty shall receive
any funds pursuant to the provisions of this para-
graph.’’; and
(7) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘in each
county’’ after ‘‘agencies’’.
SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF DATA.
(a) DATA.—If satisfactory data regarding local edu-
cational agencies is not available to calculate grant
amounts, the Secretary may use data regarding counties
or the equivalent units of local government.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—If the data for local edu-
cational agencies is available, the amendments made by
section 2 of this Act shall take effect on July 1, 1994.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2219
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to achieve savings in the
operation of the student loan programs under part B of title IV of
that Act, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 20, 1993
Mr. GORDON (for himself and Mr. GOODLING) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to achieve
savings in the operation of the student loan programs
under part B of title IV of that Act, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) The current public/private partnership has
succeeded in fulfilling the mission set for it by Con-
gress—delivering loans to students reliably and in a
timely fashion—and as such should be preserved.
Congress on the administration’s position on the ratifica-
tion of CEDAW and timetable for submission of CEDAW
for congressional consideration and approval.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 221
To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide
ester.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1993
Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene
ceph v sulfoxide ester.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXOMETHYLENE CEPH V SULFOXIDE ESTER.
Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar-
iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting
in numerical sequence the following new subheading:
‘‘
9902.31.12
Exomethylene
ceph v sulfoxide
ester (provided
for in sub-
heading
2934.90.40) ......
Free
No change
No change
On or before
12/31/95
’’.
SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.
The amendment made by section 1 applies with re-
spect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2220
To amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to ensure that students attend-
ing institutions of higher education that receive Federal funds are able
to exercise the right to freedom of speech, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 20, 1993
Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to ensure
that students attending institutions of higher education
that receive Federal funds are able to exercise the right
to freedom of speech, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Speech
on Campus Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that—
interstate branching may nonetheless elect at
any later time to permit interstate branching if
such State enacts a law expressly permitting
interstate branching by all national and State
banks.
‘‘(7) STATE IMPOSED CONDITIONS ON INTER-
STATE BRANCHING.—
‘‘(A) FILING WITH STATE BANK AUTHOR-
ITY.—A State may require a copy of an applica-
tion submitted under this section to be filed
with the host State banking authority in a time-
ly manner (and the home State banking author-
ity and the appropriate Federal banking agency
shall consider any timely comments of the host
State prior to approving that application).
‘‘(B) OTHER NONDISCRIMINATORY CONDI-
TIONS.—Subject to paragraph (10), a State
may impose other conditions on a branch estab-
lished or acquired under paragraph (3) if—
‘‘(i) the conditions do not discriminate
against out-of-State banks or bank holding
companies; and
‘‘(ii) the imposition of the conditions
is not preempted by Federal law regarding
the same subject.
257 
(2) Although paragraph (g) of Article 24 of the 
1944 Water Treaty between Mexico and the United 
States (59 Stat. 1219) requires the International 
Boundary and Water Commission (United States and 
Mexico) to annually submit a joint report to the 
United States and Mexican Governments, the last 
English-language Annual Report was filed for 2006, 
and contained no detail regarding the cost of the 
Commission’s particular activities or the specific allo-
cation of Commission resources. 
(3) The International Joint Commission last 
filed an Annual Report for 2008 which, although it 
described past Commission projects and activities in 
general terms, contained no detail regarding the cost 
of its particular activities or the specific allocation of 
Commission resources. 
(4) The International Boundary Commission 
(United States and Canada) last filed an Annual Re-
port for 2007. 
(5) The Great Lakes Fishery Commission, the 
largest recipient of United States assistance to inter-
national fisheries commissions, last filed an Annual 
Report for 2006, which was six pages long and con-
tained three lines of financial data. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:24 Sep 23, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00257
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H2583.RH
H2583
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
tor when it is likely that circumstances will
exist in which an exception to the require-
ment to provide such data is authorized by
section 304(d)(5) of the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C.
254(d)) or section 2306a(b) of title 10, United
States Code, unless the head of the agency de-
termines in writing that such data are nec-
essary for the evaluation by the agency of the
reasonableness of the price of the contract or
subcontract.
(2) The regulations also shall provide
clear standards for determining whether the
exceptions authorized by such sections apply.
In the case of the exception provided under
section 304(d)(5)(A)(i) of such Act and section
2306a(b)(1)(A) of such title (relating to ade-
quate price competition), the regulations
shall specify the criteria that will be used to
determine whether adequate price competi-
tion exists. In the case of the exception pro-
vided under section 304(d)(5)(A)(ii) of such
Act and section 2306a(b)(1)(B) of such title (re-
lating to established catalog or market prices
of commercial items sold in substantial quan-