datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4581
To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection with the
handling of complaints of violations of the Perishable Agricultural Com-
modities Act, 1930.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 15, 1994
Mr. DE LA GARZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection
with the handling of complaints of violations of the Per-
ishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS
OF VIOLATIONS OF PERISHABLE AGRICUL-
TURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.
(a) TEMPORARY FILING FEE REQUIRED.—During
fiscal years 1995 and 1996, the Secretary of Agriculture
shall require persons who submit petitions to the Secretary
under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural Com-
HR 4581 IH
modities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a violation
of section 2 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499b), to include a
filing fee of $60 per petition.
(b) TEMPORARY HANDLING FEE REQUIRED.—Dur-
ing fiscal years 1995 and 1996, if the Secretary deter-
mines under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural
Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts
contained in a petition described in such section warrant
further action, the person or persons submitting the peti-
tion shall submit to the Secretary a handling fee of $300.
The Secretary may not forward a copy of the complaint
to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker involved
until after the Secretary receives the required handling
fee. In determining the amount of damages incurred by
an injured person or persons preparatory to issuing a rep-
aration order under section 7 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g),
the Secretary shall include the amount of any handling
fee paid by the injured person or persons under this sub-
section.
(c) DEPOSIT OF FEES.—The Secretary shall deposit
fees submitted under this section into the Perishable Agri-
cultural Commodities Act Fund.
Æ
IIA
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4581
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,
and Forestry
AN ACT
To provide for the imposition of temporary fees in connection
with the handling of complaints of violations of the Per-
ishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FILING AND HANDLING FEES FOR COMPLAINTS
OF VIOLATIONS OF PERISHABLE AGRICUL-
TURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.
(a) TEMPORARY FILING FEE REQUIRED.—During
fiscal years 1995 and 1996, the Secretary of Agriculture
shall require persons who submit petitions to the Secretary
HR 4581 RFS
under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural Com-
modities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), alleging a violation
of section 2 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499b), to include a
filing fee of $60 per petition.
(b) TEMPORARY HANDLING FEE REQUIRED.—Dur-
ing fiscal years 1995 and 1996, if the Secretary deter-
mines under section 6(a) of the Perishable Agricultural
Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)), that the facts
contained in a petition described in such section warrant
further action, the person or persons submitting the peti-
tion shall submit to the Secretary a handling fee of $300.
The Secretary may not forward a copy of the complaint
to the commission merchant, dealer, or broker involved
until after the Secretary receives the required handling
fee. In determining the amount of damages incurred by
an injured person or persons preparatory to issuing a rep-
aration order under section 7 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 499g),
the Secretary shall include the amount of any handling
fee paid by the injured person or persons under this sub-
section.
(c) DEPOSIT OF FEES.—The Secretary shall deposit
fees submitted under this section into the Perishable Agri-
cultural Commodities Act Fund.
Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 1994.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
HR 1296 EAS
(c) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this title shall
diminish, enlarge, or modify a right of a Federal agency,
State agency, or political subdivision of the State—
(1) to exercise civil and criminal jurisdiction
within the Area; or
(2) to tax persons, corporations, franchises, or
property, including minerals and other interests in or
on lands or waters within the urban river corridor
portions of the Area.
(d) ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY.—Nothing in this
title requires an owner of private property to allow access
to the property by the public.
SEC. 1013. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro-
priated not to exceed $50,000 to the Commission to carry
out this Act.
(b) MATCHING FUNDS.—Funds may be made available
pursuant to this section only to the extent they are matched
by equivalent funds or in-kind contributions of services or
materials from non-Federal sources.
TITLE XI—GILPIN COUNTY, COLORADO
LAND EXCHANGE
SEC. 1101. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds and declares that—
HR 4606 EAS
Ω71æPage 40, line 3, strike out ø$4,408,775,000¿ and
insert: $4,415,514,000
Ω72æPage 40, line 11, strike out ø$3,440,871,000¿ and
insert: $3,597,371,000
Ω73æPage 40, line 17, strike out ø$869,823,000¿ and
insert: $873,662,000
Ω74æPage 40, line 22, strike out ø$89,500,000¿ and in-
sert: $88,774,000
Ω75æPage 41, line 8, after ‘‘therein’’ insert: , together
with any funds, to remain available until expended, that
represent the equitable share from the forfeiture of property
in investigations in which the Office of Inspector General
participated and which are transferred to the Office of the
Inspector General by the Department of Justice or the De-
partment of the Treasury
Ω76æPage 41, line 18, strike out ø$14,632,000¿ and in-
sert: $10,741,000
Ω77æPage 42, line 7, strike out øand section 1503¿
Ω78æPage 42, strike out lines 10 to 19 and insert:
SEC. 204. None of the funds made available by this
Act may be used to withhold payment to any State under
the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act by reason
DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, as 
added by section 2; and 
(3) summarizes the processing status of the 
samples of sexual assault evidence about which in-
formation has been entered into the Sexual Assault 
Forensic Evidence Registry established under section 
2(o) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Act of 2000, as 
added by section 3(a), including the number of sam-
ples that have not been tested. 
SEC. 5. REDUCING THE RAPE KIT BACKLOG. 
Section 2(c)(3) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimi-
nation Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135(c)(3)) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2014’’ 
and inserting ‘‘2018’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(C) For each of fiscal years 2014 through 
2018, not less than 75 percent of the total 
grant amounts shall be awarded for a combina-
tion of purposes under paragraphs (1), (2), and 
(3) of subsection (a).’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:38 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6628.IH
H6628
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
V
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4583
To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for employment
in coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 15, 1994
Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries
A BILL
To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel
for employment in coastwise trade and fisheries of the
United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That, notwithstanding sections 12105, 12106, 12107, and
12108 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of
the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 833),
as applicable on the date of this Act, the secretary of the
department in which the Coast Guard is operating may
issue a certificate of documentation for the following ves-
sel: PANDION (Maryland certification number 6589D).
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4584
To impose restrictions on the use of certain special purpose aircraft.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 15, 1994
Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Public Works and Transportation
A BILL
To impose restrictions on the use of certain special purpose
aircraft.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Purpose Air-
craft Safety Act of 1994’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or lease
a United States registered aircraft with a maximum cer-
tificated take-off weight of 12,500 pounds or more, which
has been issued a type certificate for a special purpose,
and which does not meet a minimum airworthiness code
(2) no standard certificated aircraft capable of
performing the operation is available;
(3) the operator provides evidence satisfactory
to the Administrator that the aeronautical authori-
ties of any country in which or over which the air-
craft will be operated have agreed to such operations
and have been notified that—
(A) the aircraft has not been found by the
Administrator to comply with such a minimum
airworthiness code; and
(B) the aircraft has been restricted by the
Administrator from operating for any purpose
other than the special purpose for which the
type certificate was issued; and
(4) the owner and operator of such aircraft
have provided assurance in writing to the Adminis-
trator that such aircraft will not be used for oper-
ations which have not been authorized by the
Administrator.
SEC. 4. PENALTIES.
For purposes of title IX of the Federal Aviation Act
of 1958, a violation of section 2 of this Act shall be treated
as a violation of title IV of the Federal Aviation Act of
1958.
Æ
H. R. 662—3 
on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $235,000,000 for fiscal year 
2011.’’. 
(b) HIGHWAY SAFETY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—Section 
2001(a)(2) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is amended by striking 
‘‘and $45,967,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, 
and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $108,244,000 
for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(c) 
OCCUPANT
PROTECTION
INCENTIVE
GRANTS.—Section 
2001(a)(3) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is amended by striking 
‘‘and $10,616,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, 
and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $25,000,000 
for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(d) SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS.—Section 2001(a)(4) 
of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is amended by striking ‘‘and 
$52,870,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending 
on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $124,500,000 for fiscal year 
2011.’’. 
(e) STATE TRAFFIC SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM IMPROVE-
MENTS.—Section 2001(a)(5) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is 
amended by striking ‘‘and $14,651,000 for the period beginning 
on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting 
‘‘and $34,500,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(f) ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING COUNTERMEASURES INCENTIVE 
GRANT PROGRAM.—Section 2001(a)(6) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 
1519) is amended by striking ‘‘and $59,027,000 for the period begin-
ning on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and 
inserting ‘‘and $139,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(g) 
NATIONAL
DRIVER
REGISTER.—Section 
2001(a)(7) 
of 
SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) is amended by striking ‘‘and 
$1,748,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending 
on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $4,116,000 for fiscal year 
2011.’’. 
(h) 
HIGH
VISIBILITY
ENFORCEMENT
PROGRAM.—Section 
2001(a)(8) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) is amended by striking 
‘‘and $12,315,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, 
and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $29,000,000 
for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(i) MOTORCYCLIST SAFETY.—Section 2001(a)(9) of SAFETEA– 
LU (119 Stat. 1520) is amended by striking ‘‘and $2,973,000 for 
the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 
4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(j) CHILD SAFETY AND CHILD BOOSTER SEAT SAFETY INCENTIVE 
GRANTS.—Section 2001(a)(10) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) 
is amended by striking ‘‘and $2,973,000 for the period beginning 
on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting 
‘‘and $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(k) 
ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES.—Section 
2001(a)(11) 
of 
SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) is amended by striking ‘‘and 
$10,756,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending 
on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $25,328,000 for fiscal year 
2011.’’. 
SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINIS-
TRATION PROGRAMS. 
(a) MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY GRANTS.—Section 31104(a)(7) of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(7) $209,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’.
‘‘SEC. 253. ENFORCING MAXIMUM SPENDING LIMITS.’’.
(c) ADDITIONAL CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Sec-
tion 253 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit
Control Act of 1985 is amended—
(1) by repealing subsections (b), (g), and (h),
and by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and
(f), as subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively;
(2) in subsection (b) (as redesignated), by
amending the first sentence to read as follows: ‘‘To
reduce total Federal spending to the maximum per-
missible level for a budget year, 20 percent of the
required outlay reductions shall be obtained from
non-exempt defense accounts (accounts designated
as function 050 in the President’s fiscal year 1995
budget submission) and 80 percent from non-ex-
empt, non-defense accounts (all other non-exempt
accounts).’’;
(3) in subsection (c) (as redesignated), by strik-
ing ‘‘subsection (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’;
and
(4) in subsection (e) (as redesignated), by strik-
ing ‘‘(b), (c), (d), and (e)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b), (c),
and (d)’’ and by striking ‘‘(d) or (e)’’ and inserting
‘‘(c) or ‘‘(d)’’.
(d) LOOK-BACK SEQUESTER.—Section 253 of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of
‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment under
section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which
the taxable year begins, determined by sub-
stituting ‘calendar year 1994’ for ‘calendar year
1992’ in subparagraph (B) of such section.
‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If any increase determined
under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $50, such
amount shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple
of $50.’’
SEC. 102. MODIFICATION OF TAX ON BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.
Section 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re-
lating to tax imposed on corporations) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘SEC. 11. TAX IMPOSED ON BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.
‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—There is hereby imposed on
every person engaged in a business activity a tax equal
to 20 percent (17 percent in the case of taxable years be-
ginning after December 31, 1996) of the business taxable
income of such person.
‘‘(b) LIABILITY FOR TAX.—The tax imposed by this
section shall be paid by the person engaged in the business
activity, whether such person is an individual, partnership,
corporation, or otherwise.
‘‘(c) BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.—
H. R. 662—9 
(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) 
and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(7) for fiscal year 2011, $10,338,065,000.’’. 
TITLE IV—EXTENSION OF 
EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY 
SEC. 401. EXTENSION OF EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY. 
(a) HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.—Section 9503 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘March 5, 2011’’ in subsections (b)(6)(B) 
and (c)(1) and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2011’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘the Surface Transportation Extension Act 
of 2010, Part II’’ in subsections (c)(1) and (e)(3) and inserting 
‘‘the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘March 5, 2011’’ in subsection (e)(3) and 
inserting ‘‘October 1, 2011’’. 
(b) SPORT FISH RESTORATION
AND BOATING TRUST FUND.— 
Section 9504 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Surface Transportation Extension Act of 
2010, Part II’’ each place it appears in subsection (b)(2) and 
inserting ‘‘Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘March 5, 2011’’ in subsection (d)(2) and 
inserting ‘‘October 1, 2011’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 
shall take effect on March 4, 2011. 
Speaker of the House of Representatives. 
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
HR 662 RDS 
(c) OCCUPANT PROTECTION INCENTIVE GRANTS.— 
Section 2001(a)(3) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) 
is amended by striking ‘‘and $10,616,000 for the period 
beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 
2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and $25,000,000 for fiscal year 
2011.’’. 
(d) SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS.—Section 
2001(a)(4) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘and $52,870,000 for the period beginning 
on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and 
inserting ‘‘and $124,500,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(e) STATE TRAFFIC SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM 
IMPROVEMENTS.—Section 2001(a)(5) of SAFETEA–LU 
(119 Stat. 1519) is amended by striking ‘‘and 
$14,651,000 for the period beginning on October 1, 2010, 
and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and inserting ‘‘and 
$34,500,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(f) 
ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED
DRIVING
COUNTER-
MEASURES
INCENTIVE
GRANT
PROGRAM.—Section 
2001(a)(6) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘and $59,027,000 for the period beginning 
on October 1, 2010, and ending on March 4, 2011.’’ and 
inserting ‘‘and $139,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 
(g) 
NATIONAL
DRIVER
REGISTER.—Section 
2001(a)(7) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) is amend-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:23 Mar 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H662.RDS
H662
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4589
To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the
reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone non-
attainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 16, 1994
Mr. MANZULLO (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. CRANE, Mr. FAWELL, Mr.
HYDE, Mr. SANGMEISTER, Mr. EWING, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. AR-
CHER, Mr. WALKER, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. DORNAN,
Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. HUGHES, Mr.
BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. DELAY, Mr. SAXTON, and
Mr. GALLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional
provision for the reduction of work-related vehicle trips
and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas des-
ignated as severe, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP RE-
DUCTION.
Section 182(d)(1)(b) of the Clean Air Act is amended
by to read as follows:
‘‘(B) The State may also, in its discretion, sub-
mit a revision at any time requiring employers in
such area to implement programs to reduce work-re-
lated vehicle trips and miles traveled by employees.
Such revision shall be developed in accordance with
guidance issued by the Administrator pursuant to
section 108(f) and may require that employers in
such area increase average passenger occupancy per
vehicle in commuting trips between home and the
workplace during peak travel periods. The guidance
of the Administrator may specify average vehicle oc-
cupancy rates which vary for locations within a non-
attainment area (suburban, center city, business dis-
trict) or among nonattainment areas reflecting exist-
ing occupancy rates and the availability of high oc-
cupancy modes. The revision may require employers
subject to a vehicle occupancy requirement to submit
a compliance plan to demonstrate compliance with
the requirements of this paragraph.’’.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6630 
To require that the members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees 
of the Department of Defense who were victims in the attack that 
occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, and the family 
members of those victims be accorded the same treatment, benefits, 
and honors as were accorded the victims of the September 11, 2001, 
terrorist attacks on the United States and the family members of those 
victims. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 4, 2012 
Mr. CARTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 
and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall with-
in the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To require that the members of the Armed Forces and 
civilian employees of the Department of Defense who 
were victims in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, 
Texas, on November 5, 2009, and the family members 
of those victims be accorded the same treatment, bene-
fits, and honors as were accorded the victims of the 
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United 
States and the family members of those victims. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:38 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6630.IH
H6630
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Hood Casualties 
Benefits Clarification Act’’. 
SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF VICTIMS OF THE NO-
VEMBER 5, 2009, ATTACK AT FORT HOOD, 
TEXAS. 
(a) MEMBERS AND EMPLOYEES.—Any member of 
the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department 
of Defense who was killed or wounded in the attack that 
occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, shall 
be accorded the same treatment, benefits, and honors as 
were accorded the victims of the September 11, 2001, ter-
rorist attacks on the United States on account of such 
terrorist attacks. 
(b) FAMILY MEMBERS.—Family members of a mem-
ber of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the De-
partment of Defense described in subsection (a) shall be 
accorded the same treatment, benefits, and honors as were 
accorded the families of victims of the September 11, 
2001, terrorist attacks on the United States on account 
of such terrorist attacks. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:38 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6630.IH
H6630
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Sec. 12. Estimating assumptions, reports, and orders.
Sec. 13. The current policy baseline.
Sec. 14. Relationship to pay-as-you-go.
Sec. 15. Judicial review.
Sec. 16. Application.
Sec. 17. Effective date.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Act is to create a mechanism to
control spending on mandatory programs and to increase
accountability for mandatory spending.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS AND TREATMENTS.
As used in this Act:
(1) The terms ‘‘budget authority’’, ‘‘new budget
authority’’, ‘‘entitlement authority’’, ‘‘outlays’’, and
‘‘deficit’’ have the meanings given to such terms in
section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impound-
ment Control Act of 1974.
(2) The term ‘‘account’’ means an item for
which there is a designated budget account identi-
fication code number in the President’s budget.
(3) The term ‘‘budget year’’ means, with re-
spect to a session of Congress, the fiscal year of the
Government that starts on October 1 of the calendar
year in which that session begins.
(4) The term ‘‘budget-year session’’ means any
session of Congress that starts in the calendar year
in which that budget year starts.