140 
HR 2864 PCS 
ance with the memorandum referred to in sub-
section (a)(1). 
(D) Any other conditions that the Sec-
retary may impose. 
(c) REPEAL.—Section 325 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed. 
SEC. 3046. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Latham River, Glynn County, Geor-
gia, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) 
shall be $6,175,000. 
SEC. 3047. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR IMPROVE-
MENTS, IDAHO. 
The Secretary may carry out improvements to rec-
reational facilities at the Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, 
North Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho, authorized by sec-
tion 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1193), 
to accommodate lower pool levels. 
SEC. 3048. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, 
BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—The project for navigation, 
Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, Beardstown Community 
Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois, constructed under sec-
141 
HR 2864 PCS 
tion 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577), is modified— 
(1) to include the channel between the harbor 
and the Illinois River; and 
(2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a part-
nership agreement with the city of Beardstown to 
replace the local cooperation agreement dated Au-
gust 18, 1983, with the Beardstown Community 
Park District. 
(b) TERMS
OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.—The 
partnership agreement referred to in subsection (a) shall 
include the same rights and responsibilities as the local 
cooperation agreement dated August 18, 1983, changing 
only the identity of the non-Federal sponsor. 
(c) MAINTENANCE.—Following execution of the part-
nership agreement referred to in subsection (a), the Sec-
retary may carry out maintenance of the project referred 
to in subsection (a) on an annual basis. 
SEC. 3049. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS. 
The Cache River Levee portion of the project for 
flood control, Cache River, Illinois, authorized by the Act 
of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), is modified to add envi-
ronmental restoration as a project purpose.
142 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3050. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS. 
The navigation channel for the North Branch Canal 
portion of the Chicago River, authorized by the first sec-
tion of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of 
March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1129), extending from 100 feet 
downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet up-
stream of the Division Street Bridge is modified to be no 
wider than 66 feet. 
SEC. 3051. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, ILLINOIS. 
(a) EXISTING BARRIER.—The Secretary shall up-
grade and make permanent, at Federal expense, the exist-
ing Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier 
Chicago, Illinois, constructed as a demonstration project 
under section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic 
Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
4722(i)(3)). 
(b) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The barrier 
referred to in subsection (a) and the barrier in the Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal being constructed under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be operated and maintained, at 
Federal expense, as a system in a manner to optimize ef-
fectiveness. Operation and maintenance includes inves-
tigating and eliminating potential pathways that may 
allow aquatic species in the Des Plaines River and Illinois
143 
HR 2864 PCS 
and Michigan Canal to bypass the barriers in the Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal. 
(c) FEASIBILITY STUDY.—The Secretary, in con-
sultation with appropriate Federal, State, local, and non-
governmental entities, shall conduct a feasibility study, at 
Federal expense, of the range of options and technologies 
available to prevent the spread of aquatic species between 
the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins through the 
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other pathways. 
SEC. 3052. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS. 
(a) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, Illinois, being 
carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be 
$7,500,000. 
(b) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this section shall affect 
the eligibility of the project for emergency repair assist-
ance under section 5(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act au-
thorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers 
and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes’’, 
approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n). 
SEC. 3053. LASALLE, ILLINOIS. 
In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639–4640), the Sec-
144 
HR 2864 PCS 
retary shall give priority to work in the vicinity of LaSalle, 
Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan Canal. 
SEC. 3054. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS. 
(a) PROJECT PURPOSE.—The project for flood con-
trol, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of 
the Flood Control Act of June 26, 1936 (35 Stat. 1584), 
is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose. 
(b) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project for 
improvement of the quality of the environment, Spunky 
Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), shall be $7,500,000. 
(c) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this section shall affect 
the eligibility of the project for emergency repair assist-
ance under section 5(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act au-
thorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers 
and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes’’, 
approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n). 
SEC. 3055. FORT WAYNE AND VICINITY, INDIANA. 
The project for flood control Fort Wayne, St. Mary’s 
and Maumee Rivers, Indiana, authorized by section 
101(a)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4604), is modified—
145 
HR 2864 PCS 
(1) to direct the Secretary to provide a 100- 
year level of flood protection at the Berry-Thieme, 
Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman sites 
along the St. Mary’s River, Fort Wayne and vicinity, 
Indiana, at a total cost of $5,300,000; and 
(2) to allow the non-Federal interest to partici-
pate in the financing of the project in accordance 
with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent 
that the Secretary’s evaluation indicates that apply-
ing such section is necessary to implement the 
project. 
SEC. 3056. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA. 
The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz 
Lake, Indiana, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330) and modified by section 520 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is further 
modified to direct the Secretary to seek to reduce the cost 
of the project by using innovative technologies and cost 
reduction measures determined from a review of non-Fed-
eral lake dredging projects in the vicinity of Koontz Lake. 
SEC. 3057. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA. 
The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, 
Indiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Re-
146 
HR 2864 PCS 
sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project in accordance with the postauthorization change 
report dated August 2000, at a total cost of 
$198,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$148,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$49,500,000. 
SEC. 3058. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA. 
The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West 
Fork of White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of 
the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood con-
trol, and for other purposes’’, approved June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and 
section 322 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 303–304), is further modified— 
(1) to authorize the Secretary to undertake the 
riverfront alterations described in the Central Indi-
anapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, dated February 
1994, for the Fall Creek Reach feature at a total 
cost of $28,545,000; and 
(2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of planning, design, and construction work carried
147 
HR 2864 PCS 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Sec-
retary determines that the work is integral to the 
project. 
SEC. 3059. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA. 
The project for the Des Moines Recreational River 
and Greenbelt, Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99–88 and 
modified by section 604 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is modified to include 
enhanced public access and recreational enhancements, at 
a Federal cost of $3,000,000. 
SEC. 3060. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY. 
The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project 
for flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy 
and Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Ken-
tucky, authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures 
to provide a 100-year level of flood protection for the city 
of Prestonsburg. 
SEC. 3061. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, 
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED. 
The project for flood damage reduction and recre-
ation, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East 
Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, authorized by section
148 
HR 2864 PCS 
101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of divi-
sion D of Public Law 108–7 (117 Stat. 140), is further 
modified— 
(1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the 
project with the cost sharing for the project deter-
mined in accordance with section 103(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996; 
(2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $178,000,000; and 
(3) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of work carried out by the non-Federal interest be-
fore the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project. 
SEC. 3062. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 315(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603– 
2604) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(1) is authorized to study, design, construct, 
operate, and maintain, at Federal expense, a Type 
A Regional Visitor Center in the vicinity of Morgan 
City, Louisiana, in consultation with the State of
149 
HR 2864 PCS 
Louisiana, to provide information to the public on 
the Atchafalaya River system and other associated 
waterways that have influenced surrounding commu-
nities, and national and local water resources devel-
opment of the Army Corps of Engineers in South 
Central Louisiana; and’’. 
(b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 315(b) of 
such Act is amended by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting 
‘‘(a)(2)’’. 
(c) DONATIONS.—Section 315 of such Act is amend-
ed by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(c) DONATIONS.—In carrying out subsection (a)(1), 
the Mississippi River Commission is authorized to accept 
the donation of cash, funds, lands, materials, and services 
from non-Federal governmental entities and nonprofit cor-
porations.’’. 
SEC. 3063. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA. 
The project for the improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried 
out under section 1135 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309(a)), is modified to di-
rect the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by 
the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership
150 
HR 2864 PCS 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project. 
SEC. 3064. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOU-
ISIANA. 
The public access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin 
Floodway System project, Louisiana, authorized by sec-
tion 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the Sec-
retary to acquire from willing sellers the fee interest, ex-
clusive of oil, gas, and minerals, of an additional 20,000 
acres of land within the Lower Atchafalaya Basin 
Floodway for the public access feature of the Atchafalaya 
Basin Floodway System, to enhance fish and wildlife re-
sources, at a total cost of $4,000,000. 
SEC. 3065. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI 
RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA. 
The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, 
J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to 
Shreveport, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4142) and modified by section 4(h) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), sec-
tion 102(p) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4613), section 301(b)(7) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), and
151 
HR 2864 PCS 
section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2572), is further modified— 
(1) to authorize the purchase and reforesting 
lands that have been cleared or converted to agricul-
tural uses; and 
(2) to incorporate current wildlife and forestry 
management practices for the purpose of improving 
species diversity on mitigation lands that meet Fed-
eral and State of Louisiana habitat goals and objec-
tives. 
SEC. 3066. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA. 
The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, au-
thorized as part of the project for hurricane-flood protec-
tion on Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, by section 204 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077) and modi-
fied by section 365 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is further modified to direct 
the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project the costs of relocating oyster beds 
in the Davis Pond project area if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the Mississippi Delta Region 
project. 
SEC. 3067. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LOUISIANA. 
The New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana, project for 
hurricane protection, authorized by section 203 of the
152 
HR 2864 PCS 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1184), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to carry out the work on the 
St. Jude to City Price, Upper Reach A back levee. The 
Federal share of the cost of such work shall be 70 percent. 
SEC. 3068. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST 
OF HARVEY CANAL), LOUISIANA. 
Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 304–305) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘operation and mainte-
nance’’ and inserting ‘‘operation, maintenance, 
rehabilitation, repair, and replacement’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Algiers Channel’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Algiers Canal Levees’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(c) COST SHARING.—The non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project shall be 35 percent.’’. 
SEC. 3069. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project being carried out under section 
111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) 
for the mitigation of shore damages attributable to the 
project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, shall be 
$25,000,000.
153 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3070. UNION RIVER, MAINE. 
The project for navigation, Union River, Maine, au-
thorized by the first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act 
making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes’’, approved June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 
215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area 
that portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning 
basin and lying northerly of a line commencing at a point 
N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, thence running north 61 
degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 132.34 feet 
to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61. 
SEC. 
3071. 
GWYNNS 
FALLS 
WATERSHED, 
BALTIMORE, 
MARYLAND. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out the 
project for ecosystem restoration, Gwynns Falls, Mary-
land, in accordance with the Baltimore Metropolitan 
Water Resources Gwynns Falls Watershed Study-Draft 
Feasibility Report and Integrated Environmental Assess-
ment prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the city of 
Baltimore, Maryland, dated April 2004. 
(b) SPECIAL RULE
FOR GWYNNS FALLS, MARY-
LAND.—The report on the project for environmental res-
toration at Gwynns Falls, Maryland, shall be treated as 
being consistent and in compliance with the consent decree 
entered into between the United States and the Mayor and
154 
HR 2864 PCS 
City Council of Baltimore, Maryland, filed with the United 
States District Court for the District of Maryland on April 
26, 2002. 
(c) REPEAL.—Section 123 of Public Law 108–137 
(117 Stat. 1837) is repealed. 
SEC. 3072. BOSTON HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS. 
The project for navigation, Boston Harbor, Massa-
chusetts, authorized by section 101(a)(13) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607), is 
modified to provide that no funds may be expended for 
the dredging of Chelsea Creek until the city of Boston and 
the United States Coast Guard complete the replacement 
of the Chelsea Street Bridge, as identified in the limited 
reevaluation report for the project dated June 1996. 
SEC. 3073. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHI-
GAN. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—The project for emergency 
streambank and shoreline protection, Detroit River Shore-
line, Detroit, Michigan, being carried out under section 14 
of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), is 
modified to include measures to enhance public access. 
(b) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $3,000,000.