315 
(L) GUAM.—Section 219(f)(323) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(136 Stat. 3811) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$35,000,000’’. 
(M) MAUI, HAWAII.—Section 219(f)(328) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 
3811) is modified by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 
(N) COOK COUNTY AND LAKE COUNTY, IL-
LINOIS.—Section 219(f)(54) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-221) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$149,000,000’’. 
(O) FOREST
PARK, 
ILLINOIS.—Section 
219(f)(330) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3811) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 
(P) MADISON AND ST. CLAIR COUNTIES, 
ILLINOIS.—Section 219(f)(55) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 Stat. 2763A–221; 
134 Stat. 2718; 136 Stat. 3817) is amended—
316 
(i) 
by 
inserting 
‘‘(including 
stormwater)’’ after ‘‘wastewater’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$150,000,000’’. 
(Q) SOUTH
CENTRAL
ILLINOIS.—Section 
219(f)(333) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended— 
(i) in the paragraph heading, by strik-
ing ‘‘MONTGOMERY AND CHRISTIAN COUN-
TIES, ILLINOIS’’ and inserting ‘‘SOUTH 
CENTRAL ILLINOIS’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Montgomery County 
and Christian County’’ and inserting 
‘‘Montgomery County, Christian County, 
Fayette County, Shelby County, Jasper 
County, Richland County, Crawford Coun-
ty, and Lawrence County’’. 
(R) WILL
COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—Section 
219(f)(334) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3808) is amended by striking 
‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$36,000,000’’. 
(S) BATON
ROUGE, LOUISIANA.—Section 
219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development
317 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
114 Stat. 2763A–220; 121 Stat. 1226; 136 
Stat. 
3817) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$90,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000,000’’. 
(T) EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE 
RIVER
BASIN
REGION, 
LOUISIANA.—Section 
5082(i) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1226) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘$40,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
(U) LAFOURCHE
PARISH, LOUISIANA.— 
Section 219(f)(146) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1262) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘$2,300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,300,000’’. 
(V) SOUTH CENTRAL PLANNING AND DE-
VELOPMENT COMMISSION, LOUISIANA.—Section 
219(f)(153) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 121 Stat. 1262; 136 Stat. 3817) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$12,500,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$17,500,000’’. 
(W) SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOU-
ISIANA.—Section 5085(i) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat.
318 
1228) is amended by striking ‘‘$17,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$22,000,000’’. 
(X) FITCHBURG, MASSACHUSETTS.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(336) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
(Y) HAVERHILL, MASSACHUSETTS.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(337) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
(Z) LAWRENCE, 
MASSACHUSETTS.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(338) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
(AA) LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS.—Section 
219(f)(339) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
(BB) METHUEN, MASSACHUSETTS.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(340) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
319 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 
(CC) MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(345) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking 
‘‘$40,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000’’. 
(DD) MICHIGAN.—Section 219(f)(157) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4825; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 
1262; 136 Stat. 3818) is amended— 
(i) in the paragraph heading, by strik-
ing ‘‘MICHIGAN COMBINED SEWER OVER-
FLOWS’’ and inserting ‘‘MICHIGAN’’; and 
(ii) in subparagraph (A) by striking 
‘‘$85,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$160,000,000’’. 
(EE) 
BILOXI, 
MISSISSIPPI.—Section 
219(f)(163) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat, 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1263) is amended by striking 
‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
(FF) DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat.
320 
336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 
Stat. 2257; 122 Stat. 1623; 134 Stat. 2718) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$130,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$170,000,000’’. 
(GG) MADISON
COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.— 
Section 219(f)(351) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat, 4835; 113 
Stat. 336; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by strik-
ing 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$22,000,000’’. 
(HH) MERIDIAN, 
MISSISSIPPI.—Section 
219(f)(352) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat, 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$26,000,000’’. 
(II) RANKIN
COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(354) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat, 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$22,000,000’’. 
(JJ) 
ST. 
LOUIS, 
MISSOURI.—Section 
219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 337; 
121 Stat. 1233; 134 Stat. 2718) is amended by
321 
striking 
‘‘$70,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$100,000,000’’. 
(KK) CAMDEN, 
NEW
JERSEY.—Section 
219(f)(357) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking 
‘‘$119,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$143,800,000’’. 
(LL) CENTRAL
NEW
MEXICO.—Section 
593(h) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 380; 119 Stat. 2255; 
136 Stat. 3820) is amended by striking 
‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$150,000,000’’. 
(MM) KIRYAS JOEL, NEW YORK.—Section 
219(f)(184) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1264) is amended by striking 
‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$25,000,000’’. 
(NN) 
QUEENS, 
NEW
YORK.—Section 
219(f)(377) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 136 Stat. 3814) is amended by striking 
‘‘$119,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$190,000,000’’. 
(OO) NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.—Sec-
tion 552(a) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3780; 136 Stat.
322 
3821) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary may consider natural and na-
ture-based infrastructure.’’. 
(PP) NORTH CAROLINA.—Section 5113 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(121 Stat. 1237) is amended in subsection (f) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$13,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$50,000,000’’. 
(QQ) 
CLEVELAND, 
OHIO.—Section 
219(f)(207) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1265) is amended by striking 
‘‘$2,500,000 for Flats East Bank’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$25,500,000’’. 
(RR) 
CINCINNATI, 
OHIO.—Section 
219(f)(206) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
334; 121 Stat. 1265) is amended by striking 
‘‘$1,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$31,000,000’’. 
(SS) OHIO.—Section 594 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
381; 119 Stat. 2261; 121 Stat. 1140; 121 Stat. 
1944; 136 Stat. 3821) is amended in subsection