†
327
HR 2864 EAS
date on which the Fund is expected to be
fully capitalized.
‘‘(ii) AFTER FULL CAPITALIZATION.—
On and after the date on which each Fund
is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest
account of the Fund shall be invested and
reinvested in eligible obligations having the
shortest maturity then available until the
amounts are withdrawn and transferred to
fund the activities authorized under sub-
section (d)(3).
‘‘(E) PAR PURCHASE PRICE.—The price to
be paid for eligible obligations purchased as in-
vestments of the principal account shall not ex-
ceed the par value of the obligations so that the
amount of the principal account shall be pre-
served in perpetuity.
‘‘(F) HIGHEST YIELD.—Among eligible obli-
gations having the same maturity and purchase
price, the obligation to be purchased shall be the
obligation having the highest yield.
‘‘(G) HOLDING TO MATURITY.—Eligible ob-
ligations purchased shall generally be held to
their maturities.
†
328
HR 2864 EAS
‘‘(3) ANNUAL REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ACTIVI-
TIES.—Not less frequently than once each calendar
year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall review with
the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule
Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as the
‘Tribes’) the results of the investment activities and fi-
nancial status of the Funds during the preceding 12-
month period.
‘‘(4) AUDITS.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The activities of the
Tribes in carrying out the plans of the Tribes for
terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration under sec-
tion 602(a) shall be audited as part of the an-
nual audit that the Tribes are required to pre-
pare under the Office of Management and Budg-
et Circular A-133 (or a successor circulation).
‘‘(B) DETERMINATION
BY
AUDITORS.—An
auditor that conducts an audit under subpara-
graph (A) shall—
‘‘(i) determine whether funds received
by the Tribes under this section during the
period covered by the audit were used to
carry out the plan of the appropriate Tribe
in accordance with this section; and
†
329
HR 2864 EAS
‘‘(ii) include the determination under
clause (i) in the written findings of the
audit.
‘‘(5) MODIFICATION OF INVESTMENT REQUIRE-
MENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the
Treasury determines that meeting the require-
ments under paragraph (2) with respect to the
investment of a Fund is not practicable, or
would result in adverse consequences for the
Fund, the Secretary shall modify the require-
ments, as the Secretary determines to be nec-
essary.
‘‘(B) CONSULTATION.—Before modifying a
requirement under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary of the Treasury shall consult with the
Tribes regarding the proposed modification.’’;
and
(2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(f) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—There are author-
ized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury
not otherwise appropriated, to the Secretary of the Treasury
to pay expenses associated with investing the Funds and
auditing the uses of amounts withdrawn from the Funds—
†
330
HR 2864 EAS
‘‘(1) up to $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006
and 2007; and
‘‘(2) such sums as are necessary for each subse-
quent fiscal year.’’.
SEC. 5011. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall evaluate, de-
sign, and construct structural modifications at full Federal
cost to the Union Village Dam (Ompompanoosuc River),
North Hartland Dam (Ottauquechee River), North Spring-
field Dam (Black River), Ball Mountain Dam (West River),
and Townshend Dam (West River), Vermont, to regulate
flow and temperature to mitigate downstream impacts on
aquatic habitat and fisheries.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$30,000,000.
TITLE VI—PROJECT
DEAUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 6001. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, ALABAMA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Little Cove
Creek, Glencoe, Alabama, authorized by the Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 312), is not authorized.
†
331
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6002. GOLETA AND VICINITY, CALIFORNIA.
The project for flood control, Goleta and Vicinity, Cali-
fornia, authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act
of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826), is not authorized.
SEC. 6003. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The portion of the project for navi-
gation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the
Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-
foot channel in Yellow Mill River and described in sub-
section (b), is not authorized.
(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.—The project referred
to in subsection (a) is described as beginning at a point
along the eastern limit of the existing project, N.
123,649.75, E. 481,920.54, thence running northwesterly
about 52.64 feet to a point N. 123,683.03, E. 481,879.75,
thence running northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point
N. 125,030.08, E. 482,394.96, thence running northeasterly
about 139.52 feet to a point along the east limit of the exist-
ing channel, N. 125,133.87, E. 482,488.19, thence running
southwesterly about 1,588.98 feet to the point of origin.
SEC. 6004. BRIDGEPORT, CONNECTICUT.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Bridge-
port, Connecticut, authorized by section 219(f)(26) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
113 Stat. 336), is not authorized.
†
332
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6005. HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Hart-
ford, Connecticut, authorized by section 219(f)(27) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
113 Stat. 336), is not authorized.
SEC. 6006. NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.
The project for environmental infrastructure, New
Haven, Connecticut, authorized by section 219(f)(28) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835;
113 Stat. 336), is not authorized.
SEC. 6007. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO
CHESAPEAKE BAY, PART II, INSTALLATION OF
FENDER PROTECTION FOR BRIDGES, DELA-
WARE AND MARYLAND.
The project for the construction of bridge fenders for
the Summit and St. Georges Bridge for the Inland Water-
way of the Delaware River to the C & D Canal of the Chesa-
peake Bay, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954
(68 Stat. 1249), is not authorized.
SEC. 6008. SHINGLE CREEK BASIN, FLORIDA.
The project for flood control, Central and Southern
Florida Project, Shingle Creek Basin, Florida, authorized
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat.
1182), is not authorized.
†
333
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6009. BREVOORT, INDIANA.
The project for flood control, Brevoort, Indiana, au-
thorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 (49
Stat. 1587), is not authorized.
SEC. 6010. MIDDLE WABASH, GREENFIELD BAYOU, INDIANA.
The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, Green-
field Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood
Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 649), is not authorized.
SEC. 6011. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, INDIANA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George,
Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is not
authorized.
SEC. 6012. GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO.
2, IOWA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Green Bay
Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa, authorized by sec-
tion 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(100 Stat. 4115), deauthorized in fiscal year 1991, and re-
authorized by section 115(a)(1) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4821), is not authorized.
SEC. 6013. MUSCATINE HARBOR, IOWA.
The project for navigation at the Muscatine Harbor
on the Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat.
166), is not authorized.
†
334
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6014. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND REC-
REATIONAL 
AREA, 
KENTUCKY 
AND 
TEN-
NESSEE.
The project for recreation facilities at Big South Fork
National River and Recreational Area, Kentucky and Ten-
nessee, authorized by section 108 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 43), is not authorized.
SEC. 6015. EAGLE CREEK LAKE, KENTUCKY.
The project for flood control and water supply, Eagle
Creek Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1188), is not author-
ized.
SEC. 6016. HAZARD, KENTUCKY.
The project for flood damage reduction, Hazard, Ken-
tucky, authorized by section 3 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat.
4621), is not authorized.
SEC. 6017. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KENTUCKY.
The project for flood control, West Kentucky Tribu-
taries, Kentucky, authorized by section 204 of the Flood
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1081), section 201 of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), and section 401(b) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat.
4129), is not authorized.
†
335
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6018. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LOU-
ISIANA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Bayou
Cocodrie and Tributaries, Louisiana, authorized by section
3 of the of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 644, chapter
377), and section 1(a) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 12), is not authorized.
SEC. 6019. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP,
LOUISIANA.
The uncompleted portions of the project for navigation
improvement for Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump,
Louisiana, authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (49
Stat. 1033, chapter 831), and the River and Harbor Act
of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), are not authorized.
SEC. 
6020. 
EASTERN 
RAPIDES 
AND 
SOUTH-CENTRAL
AVOYELLES PARISHES, LOUISIANA.
The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and
South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by
section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825),
is not authorized.
SEC. 6021. FORT LIVINGSTON, GRAND TERRE ISLAND, LOU-
ISIANA.
The project for erosion protection and recreation, Fort
Livingston, Grande Terre Island, Louisiana, authorized by
the Act of August 13, 1946 (commonly known as the ‘‘Flood
†
336
HR 2864 EAS
Control Act of 1946’’) (33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.), is not au-
thorized.
SEC. 6022. GULF INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY, LAKE BORGNE
AND CHEF MENTEUR, LOUISIANA.
The project for the construction of bulkheads and jetties
at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, Louisiana, as part of
the Gulf Intercoastal Waterway authorized by the first sec-
tion of the River and Harbor Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 635),
is not authorized.
SEC. 6023. RED RIVER WATERWAY, SHREVEPORT, LOU-
ISIANA TO DAINGERFIELD, TEXAS.
The project for the Red River Waterway, Shreveport,
Louisiana to Daingerfield, Texas, authorized by section 101
of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is not
authorized.
SEC. 6024. CASCO BAY, PORTLAND, MAINE.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Casco
Bay in the Vicinity of Portland, Maine, authorized by sec-
tion 307 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(106 Stat. 4841), is not authorized.
SEC. 6025. NORTHEAST HARBOR, MAINE.
The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine,
authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59
Stat. 12, chapter 19), is not authorized.
†
337
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 6026. PENOBSCOT RIVER, BANGOR, MAINE.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Penob-
scot River in the Vicinity of Bangor, Maine, authorized by
section 307 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(106 Stat. 4841), is not authorized.
SEC. 6027. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, MAINE.
The project for research and demonstration program
of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques,
Saint John River Basin, Maine, authorized by section 1108
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (106 Stat.
4230), is not authorized.
SEC. 6028. TENANTS HARBOR, MAINE.
The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine,
authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919
(40 Stat. 1275, chapter 95), is not authorized.
SEC. 6029. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MICHIGAN.
The project for navigation, Grand Haven Harbor,
Michigan, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4093), is not
authorized.
SEC. 6030. GREENVILLE HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.
The project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, Mis-
sissippi, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is not
authorized.
†
338
HR 2864 EAS
SEC. 
6031. 
PLATTE 
RIVER 
FLOOD 
AND 
RELATED
STREAMBANK 
EROSION 
CONTROL, 
NE-
BRASKA.
The project for flood damage reduction, Platte River
Flood and Related Streambank Erosion Control, Nebraska,
authorized by section 603 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4149), is not authorized.
SEC. 6032. EPPING, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Epping,
New Hampshire, authorized by section 219(c)(6) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835),
is not authorized.
SEC. 6033. MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
The project for environmental infrastructure, Man-
chester, New Hampshire, authorized by section 219(c)(7) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4836), is not authorized.
SEC. 6034. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS,
CLAREMONT TERMINAL, JERSEY CITY, NEW
JERSEY.
The project for navigation, New York Harbor and ad-
jacent channels, Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, New Jer-
sey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is not authorized.