datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
That section 1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat.
4562) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting
‘‘OR WATER EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICA-
TION’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), re-
spectively, and indenting appropriately;
(C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting
the following:
‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and
(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to
the measures authorized under paragraph (1)
for electrification, the Secretary is authorized to
use not more than $4,000,000 of sums appro-
priated under paragraph (1) to study the engi-
neering feasibility of exchanging water from the
Columbia River for water historically diverted
from the Yakima River.
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out
subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in coordina-
tion with the Kennewick Irrigation District and
in consultation with the Bonneville Power Ad-
ministration, shall—
‘‘(i) prepare a report that describes
project benefits and contains feasibility
level designs and cost estimates;
‘‘(ii) secure the critical right-of-way
areas for the pipeline alignment;
‘‘(iii) prepare an environmental as-
sessment; and
‘‘(iv) conduct such other studies or in-
vestigations as are necessary to develop a
water exchange.’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or
water exchange’’ after ‘‘electrification’’; and
(B) in the second sentence of paragraph
(2)(A), by inserting ‘‘or the equivalent of the
rate’’ before the period;
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘electrifica-
tion,’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘elec-
trification or water exchange’’; and
(4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘of the two’’
and inserting ‘‘thereof’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 20,
2000.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 3986
One Hundred Sixth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand
An Act
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange in lieu
of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Wash-
ington.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section
1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat. 4562) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘OR WATER
EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICATION’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as
subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively, and indenting
appropriately;
(C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and
(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to the measures
authorized under paragraph (1) for electrification, the Sec-
retary is authorized to use not more than $4,000,000 of
sums appropriated under paragraph (1) to study the
engineering feasibility of exchanging water from the
Columbia River for water historically diverted from the
Yakima River.
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out subparagraph
(A), the Secretary, in coordination with the Kennewick
Irrigation District and in consultation with the Bonneville
Power Administration, shall—
‘‘(i) prepare a report that describes project benefits
and contains feasibility level designs and cost esti-
mates;
‘‘(ii) secure the critical right-of-way areas for the
pipeline alignment;
‘‘(iii) prepare an environmental assessment; and
‘‘(iv) conduct such other studies or investigations
as are necessary to develop a water exchange.’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or water exchange’’
after ‘‘electrification’’; and
(B) in the second sentence of paragraph (2)(A), by
inserting ‘‘or the equivalent of the rate’’ before the period;
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘electrification,’’ each place
it appears and inserting ‘‘electrification or water exchange’’;
and
H. R. 3986—2
(4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘of the two’’ and inserting
‘‘thereof ’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3986
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange
in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser
Diversion Dam, Washington.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a
water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler
Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHANDLER PUMPING PLANT AND POWER-
PLANT OPERATIONS AT PROSSER DIVERSION
DAM, WASHINGTON.
Section 1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat.
4562) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting
‘‘OR WATER EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICA-
TION’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), re-
spectively, and indenting appropriately;
(C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting
the following:
‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and
(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to
the measures authorized under paragraph (1),
the Secretary may use sums appropriated under
paragraph (1) to study the engineering feasi-
bility of exchanging water from the Columbia
River for water historically diverted from the
Yakima River.
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out
subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in coordina-
tion with the Kennewick Irrigation District and
the Columbia Irrigation District—
‘‘(i) shall prepare a report that de-
scribes project benefits, contains feasibility
level designs and cost estimates;
HR 3986 RFS
That section 1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat.
4562) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting
‘‘OR WATER EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICA-
TION’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), re-
spectively, and indenting appropriately;
(C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting
the following:
‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and
(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to
the measures authorized under paragraph (1)
for electrification, the Secretary is authorized to
use not more than $4,000,000 of sums appro-
priated under paragraph (1) to study the engi-
neering feasibility of exchanging water from the
Columbia River for water historically diverted
from the Yakima River.
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out
subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in coordina-
tion with the Kennewick Irrigation District and
HR 3986 RFS
in consultation with the Bonneville Power Ad-
ministration, shall—
‘‘(i) prepare a report that describes
project benefits and contains feasibility
level designs and cost estimates;
‘‘(ii) secure the critical right-of-way
areas for the pipeline alignment;
‘‘(iii) prepare an environmental as-
sessment; and
‘‘(iv) conduct such other studies or in-
vestigations as are necessary to develop a
water exchange.’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or
water exchange’’ after ‘‘electrification’’; and
(B) in the second sentence of paragraph
(2)(A), by inserting ‘‘or the equivalent of the
rate’’ before the period;
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘electrifica-
tion,’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘elec-
trification or water exchange’’; and
HR 3986 RFS
(4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘of the two’’
and inserting ‘‘thereof’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 20,
2000.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
IB
Union Calendar No. 520
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3986
[Report No. 106–864]
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange
in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser
Diversion Dam, Washington.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Resources
SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 15, 2000]
A BILL
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a
water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler
Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHANDLER PUMPING PLANT AND POWERPLANT
OPERATIONS AT PROSSER DIVERSION DAM,
WASHINGTON.
Section 1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat. 4562)
is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting
‘‘OR WATER EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICA-
TION’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), re-
spectively, and indenting appropriately;
(C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting
the following:
‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and
(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to the
measures authorized under paragraph (1) for
electrification, the Secretary is authorized to use
not more than $4,000,000 of sums appropriated
under paragraph (1) to study the engineering
feasibility of exchanging water from the Colum-
bia River for water historically diverted from the
Yakima River.
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out
subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in coordination
with the Kennewick Irrigation District and in
consultation with the Bonneville Power Adminis-
tration, shall—
‘‘(i) prepare a report that describes
project benefits and contains feasibility level
designs and cost estimates;
‘‘(ii) secure the critical right-of-way
areas for the pipeline alignment;
‘‘(iii) prepare an environmental assess-
ment; and
‘‘(iv) conduct such other studies or in-
vestigations as are necessary to develop a
water exchange.’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or
water exchange’’ after ‘‘electrification’’; and
(B) in the second sentence of paragraph
(2)(A), by inserting ‘‘or the equivalent of the
rate’’ before the period;
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘electrifica-
tion,’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘elec-
trification or water exchange’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) In the case of the San Gabriel Basin demonstra-
tion project authorized by section 1614, the Federal share
of the cost of such project may not exceed the sum deter-
mined by adding—
‘‘(i) the amount that applies to that project
under subparagraph (A); and
‘‘(ii) $12,500,000.’’.
Æ
(4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘of the two’’
and inserting ‘‘thereof’’.
Union Calendar No. 520
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3986
[Report No. 106–864]
A BILL
To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility
of a water exchange in lieu of electrification of
the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser Diver-
sion Dam, Washington.
SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
and ordered to be printed
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3988
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Carbamic Acid (V–9069)
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Carbamic
Acid (V–9069).
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF
DUTY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended in heading 9902.33.61 by striking ‘‘On or before
12/31/2000’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2003’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
H. R. 3995
One Hundred Sixth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand
An Act
To establish procedures governing the responsibilities of court-appointed receivers
who administer departments, offices, and agencies of the District of Columbia
government.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia Receivership
Accountability Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO RECEIVERS WITH RESPON-
SIBILITIES OVER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Each District of Columbia receiver shall be
subject to the requirements described in section 3.
(b) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RECEIVER DEFINED.—In this Act,
a ‘‘District of Columbia receiver’’ is any receiver or other official
who is first appointed by the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia or the Superior Court of the District
of Columbia during 1995 or any succeeding year to administer
any department, agency, or office of the government of the District
of Columbia.
SEC. 3. REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED.
(a) PROMOTING FINANCIAL STABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EFFI-
CIENCY.—Each District of Columbia receiver who is responsible
for the administration of a department, agency, or office of the
government of the District of Columbia shall carry out the adminis-
tration of such department, agency, or office through practices
which promote the financial stability and management efficiency
of the government of the District of Columbia.
(b) COST CONTROL.—Each District of Columbia receiver who
is responsible for the administration of a department, agency, or
office of the government of the District of Columbia shall ensure
that the costs incurred in the administration of such department,
agency, or office (including personnel costs of the receiver) are
consistent with applicable regional and national standards.
(c) USE OF PRACTICES TO PROMOTE EFFICIENT AND COST-EFFEC-
TIVE ADMINISTRATION.—Each District of Columbia receiver who is
responsible for the administration of a department, agency, or office
of the government of the District of Columbia shall carry out the
administration of such department, agency, or office through the
application of generally accepted accounting principles and gen-
erally accepted fiscal management practices.
(d) PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF BUDGET.—
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3989
To suspend temporarily the duty on nicosulfuron formulated product
(‘‘Accent’’).
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To suspend temporarily the duty on nicosulfuron formulated
product (‘‘Accent’’).
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following
new heading:
‘‘
9902.38.01
2-(((((4,6-Di-
methoxypyrimi-
din-2-yl)
aminocarbonyl))-
N,N- dimethyl-3-
pyridinecarboxa-
mide (CAS No.
122931-48-0)
(provided for in
subheading
3808.10.15) .......
Free
No change
No change
On or before
12/31/04
’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 398
To make appropriations for fiscal year 2000 for a plant genetic conservation
program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 19, 1999
Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Appropriations
A BILL
To make appropriations for fiscal year 2000 for a plant
genetic conservation program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Plant Genetic Con-
servation Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000’’.
SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION FOR PLANT GENETIC CONSERVA-
TION.
The following sums are appropriated, out of any
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fis-
cal year 2000:
HR 398 IH
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
PLANT GENETIC CONSERVATION
For expenses necessary to carry out a plant genetic
conservation program to store material from rare, endan-
gered, and threatened plants in Hawaii and other States
and areas of the United States, including expenses for
construction and maintenance of a temperature-controlled
facility for such purpose, $1,500,000.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3990
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rimsulfuron.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rimsulfuron.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF
DUTY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended in heading 9902.33.60 by striking ‘‘On or before
12/31/2000’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2003’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3991
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DPX–E9260.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DPX–E9260.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF
DUTY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended in heading 9902.33.63 by striking ‘‘On or before
12/31/2000’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2003’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3992
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DPX–E6758.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DPX–E6758.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF
DUTY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended in heading 9902.33.63 by striking ‘‘On or before
12/31/2001’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2003’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
ment, agency, or office of the government of the District
of Columbia administered by the receiver through the
Chief Procurement Officer of the District of Columbia, in
accordance with applicable policies and practices estab-
lished by the Chief Procurement Officer for departments,
agencies, and offices of the government of the District of
Columbia.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3994
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of
1992 to increase the Federal share of the costs of the San Gabriel
Basin demonstration project.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 15, 2000
Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself, Mr. DREIER, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Ms. ROY-
BAL-ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Ad-
justment Act of 1992 to increase the Federal share of
the costs of the San Gabriel Basin demonstration project.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN FEDERAL SHARE OF SAN GA-
BRIEL BASIN DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.
Section 1631(d)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Au-
thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h–
13) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘In the case’’ and inserting ‘‘(A)
Subject to subparagraph (B), in the case’’; and
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3998
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that the rate of compensa-
tion paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs for the service-connected
loss of one or both breasts due to a radical mastectomy shall be the
same as the rate for the service-connected loss or loss of use of one
or more creative organs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 16, 2000
Mr. EVANS (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. FILNER, Mr.
GUTIERREZ, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. CARSON, Mr. REYES, Mr.
RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SHOWS, Mrs. MORELLA, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KAPTUR,
Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Ms. WATERS, Mr. ABERCROMBIE,
Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. FROST, Mr. KENNEDY of
Rhode Island, Mr. MCHUGH, and Mrs. THURMAN) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that
the rate of compensation paid by the Department of
Veterans Affairs for the service-connected loss of one
or both breasts due to a radical mastectomy shall be
the same as the rate for the service-connected loss or
loss of use of one or more creative organs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Special
Monthly Compensation Gender Equity Act’’.
SEC. 2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID BY DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS AT SO-CALLED ‘‘K’’ RATE
FOR SERVICE-CONNECTED LOSS OF ONE OR
BOTH BREASTS DUE TO RADICAL MASTEC-
TOMY.
Section 1114(k) of title 38, United States Code, is
amended by inserting ‘‘or one or both breasts due to a
radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy,’’ after
‘‘loss or loss of use of one or more creative organs,’’.
Æ