datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(1) IN GENERAL.—An entity shall be deemed to 
be in compliance with— 
(A) in the case of a financial institution— 
(i) subsection (a), and any regulations 
prescribed under subsection (a), if the fi-
nancial institution maintains policies and 
procedures to protect the confidentiality 
and security of sensitive financial account 
information and sensitive personal infor-
mation that are consistent with the policies 
and procedures of the financial institution 
that are designed to comply with the re-
quirements of section 501(b) of the 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley 
Act 
(15 
U.S.C. 
6801(b)) and any regulations or guidance 
prescribed under that section that are ap-
plicable to the financial institution; and 
(ii) subsections (b) and (c), and any 
regulations prescribed under subsections 
(b) and (c), if the financial institution— 
(I)(aa) maintains policies and 
procedures to investigate and provide 
notice to consumers of breaches of 
data security that are consistent with 
the policies and procedures of the fi-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:49 May 12, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2205.IH
H2205
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
nancial institution that are designed 
to comply with the investigation and 
notice requirements established by 
regulations or guidance under section 
501(b) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley 
Act (15 U.S.C. 6801(b)) that are ap-
plicable to the financial institution; 
(bb) is an affiliate of a bank 
holding company that maintains poli-
cies and procedures to investigate and 
provide 
notice 
to 
consumers 
of 
breaches of data security that are con-
sistent with the policies and proce-
dures of a bank that is an affiliate of 
the financial institution, and the poli-
cies and procedures of the bank are 
designed to comply with the investiga-
tion and notice requirements estab-
lished by any regulations or guidance 
under section 501(b) of the Gramm- 
Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6801(b)) 
that are applicable to the bank; or 
(cc)(AA) is an affiliate of a sav-
ings and loan holding company that 
maintains policies and procedures to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:49 May 12, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2205.IH
H2205
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
retary of State and the Attorney General, may sus-
pend the application of paragraph (1) on a case-by- 
case basis in such Secretary’s sole and unreviewable 
discretion. 
(3) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT.—The Sec-
retary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Secu-
rity shall implement this subsection in consultation 
with the Attorney General. 
(4) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sub-
section may be construed to alter an alien’s burden 
of demonstrating admissibility under the immigra-
tion laws of the United States. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 May 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2203.IH
H2203
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 441 IH
Whereas the people of Crete fought tenaciously during the
Battle of Crete, delaying for two months the Nazi Ger-
man invasion of Russia;
Whereas this delay forced Nazi German forces to invade Rus-
sia in the face the brutal Russian winter, changing the
final outcome of World War II and leading to the defeat
of fascism;
Whereas many historians agree that the Battle of Crete was
one of the most significant battles of World War II;
Whereas the Battle of Crete contributed to saving the free
world from Nazi German occupation, thus preserving de-
mocracy, freedom, and human dignity;
Whereas the Cretan Resistance Movement was organized to
fight the Nazi German occupation of the island of Crete;
Whereas for 4 years, the Cretan Resistance Movement in-
flicted heavy casualties upon Nazi German forces, includ-
ing kidnapping a heavily-guarded Nazi German General,
setting an example for all of the people of Europe to fol-
low;
Whereas the people of Crete suffered savage reprisals for
their heroic resistance when the Nazi German invaders
randomly executed thousands of civilians and burned and
destroyed entire communities;
Whereas many participants in the Battle of Crete and the
Cretan Resistance Movement later emigrated to the Unit-
ed States and became American citizens; and
Whereas many of these citizens became members of the
PanCretan Association of America, an organization com-
prised of Greek Americans with ancestry from the island
of Crete and committed to preserving and promoting the
•HRES 441 IH
rich culture and proud history of Crete: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
(1) calls upon all Americans to recognize and
appreciate the historical significance of the Battle of
Crete and of the Cretan Resistance Movement and
the heroic human endeavor and sacrifice of the peo-
ple of Crete during World War II;
(2) requests that the President issue a Procla-
mation calling on the people of the United States—
(A) to observe the memory of the fallen he-
roes of the Battle of Crete; and
(B) to honor the living men and women of
Crete who, during World War II, fought an op-
pressive invader to preserve the ideals of free-
dom, democracy, and the pursuit of happiness;
and
(3) commends the PanCretan Association of
America for preserving and promoting the history of
Crete and its people.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2204 
To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions thereof to regulate 
liquefied petroleum gas rail transload facilities that are owned or operated 
by or on behalf of a rail carrier. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 1, 2015 
Mr. MCGOVERN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions 
thereof to regulate liquefied petroleum gas rail transload 
facilities that are owned or operated by or on behalf 
of a rail carrier. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Communities Act 
of 2015’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 May 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2204.IH
H2204
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION 
BOARD. 
Section 10501(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 
and (B) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respec-
tively; and 
(B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), 
as so redesignated, the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(A) the term ‘liquefied petroleum gas rail 
transload facility’ means the portion of a facility 
owned or operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier 
where liquefied petroleum gas, as a commodity to be 
transported for a charge, is collected, stored, sepa-
rated, processed, treated, managed, disposed of, or 
transferred, but such term does not include activities 
taking place at such portion that are comprised sole-
ly of the railroad transportation of liquefied petro-
leum gas after the liquefied petroleum gas is loaded 
for shipment on or in a rail car, including railroad 
transportation for the purpose of interchanging rail-
road cars containing liquefied petroleum gas;’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 May 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2204.IH
H2204
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara-
graph (A); 
(B) by striking the period at the end of 
subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(C) a liquefied petroleum gas rail transload fa-
cility.’’. 
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective 
as of July 1, 2013. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 May 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2204.IH
H2204
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
H. Res. 442
In the House of Representatives, U.S.,
May 30, 1996.
Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this
resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of
rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee
of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider-
ation of the bill (H.R. 3517) making appropriations for
military construction, family housing, and base realign-
ment and closure for the Department of Defense for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other pur-
poses. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.
Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure
to comply with clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. General
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appro-
priations. After general debate the bill shall be considered
for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order
against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with
clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration
•HRES 442 EH
of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee
of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the
basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has
caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional
Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule
XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may
postpone until a time during further consideration in the
Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on
any amendment. The Chairman of the Committee of the
Whole may reduce to not less than five minutes the time
for voting by electronic device on any postponed question
that immediately follows another vote by electronic device
without intervening business, provided that the time for
voting by electronic device on the first in any series of
questions shall be not less than fifteen minutes. After the
reading of the final lines of the bill, a motion that the
Committee of the Whole rise and report the bill to the
House with such amendments as may have been adopted
shall, if offered by the majority leader or a designee, have
precedence over a motion to amend. At the conclusion of
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and
•HRES 442 EH
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening
motion except one motion to recommit with or without in-
structions.
Attest:
Clerk.
shall not exceed the gross amount of the loan guar-
anteed under this subsection which is part of such 
financing. 
‘‘(D) COMMERCIAL
LOAN
PROVISIONS.—The 
commercial loan obtained by the small business con-
cern— 
‘‘(i) may be made by the participating 
lender that is providing financing under this 
subsection or by a different lender; 
‘‘(ii) may be secured by a senior lien; and 
‘‘(iii) may be made by a lender in the Pre-
ferred Lenders Program, if applicable. 
‘‘(E) COMMERCIAL LOAN FEE.—A one-time fee 
in an amount equal to 0.7 percent of the amount of 
the commercial loan shall be paid to the Adminis-
trator if the commercial loan has a senior credit po-
sition to that of the loan guaranteed under this 
paragraph. Any fee under the preceding sentence 
shall be paid by the participating lender and shall 
not be charged to the borrower. 
‘‘(F) DEFERRED
PARTICIPATION
LOAN
SECU-
RITY.—A loan guaranteed under this paragraph may 
be secured by a subordinated lien. 
‘‘(G) COMPLETION
OF
APPLICATION
PROC-
ESSING.—The Administrator shall complete proc-
HRES 443 IH
eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and for other pur-
poses. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with,
and all points of order against the bill and its consider-
ation are hereby waived. After general debate, which shall
be confined to the bill and any amendments made in order
under this resolution, and which shall not exceed two
hours, equally divided between a proponent and an oppo-
nent thereto, the bill shall be considered as having been
read for amendment under the five-minute rule.
SEC. 2. Immediately following general debate, it shall
be in order for the House to consider an amendment in
the nature of a substitute to be offered by Mr. Bliley of
Virginia or his designee. The substitute shall be considered
as read, and all points of order against the substitute and
its consideration are hereby waived. If the amendment in
the nature of a substitute is adopted, the bill as so amend-
ed shall be considered as the original text for the purpose
of amendment. No further amendments shall be in order
to the bill except amendments which are printed in the
Congressional Record at least one day prior to the adop-
tion of this resolution. All points of order against any such
amendment meeting these criteria are hereby waived, ex-
cept those arising under clause 7 of rule XVI. No amend-
ment to any amendment shall be in order. No amendment
shall be subject to a demand for the division of the ques-
HRES 443 IH
tion in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. De-
bate on any amendment to the bill shall not exceed sixty
minutes. Debate time on amendments to the bill shall not
exceed ten hours, and it shall not be in order to consider
any motion which has the effect of limiting the total de-
bate time on amendments to less than ten hours. At the
conclusion of the consideration of the bill for amendment,
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The
previous question shall be considered to be ordered on the
bill and any amendment thereto to final passage without
intervening motion except one motion to recommit, with
or without instructions.
SEC. 3. If on any day the Committee rises and re-
ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, the
House shall, on the next legislative day immediately fol-
lowing House approval of the Journal, resolve itself into
the Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union
for the further consideration of the bill.
Æ
IV
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. RES. 444
Urging the detention and extradition to the United States by the appropriate
foreign governments of Mohammed Abbas for the murder of Leon Klinghoffer.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 29, 1996
Mr. FORBES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on International Relations
RESOLUTION
Urging the detention and extradition to the United States
by the appropriate foreign governments of Mohammed
Abbas for the murder of Leon Klinghoffer.
Whereas Mohammed Abbas, alias Abu Abbas, was convicted
by a Genoan court in June 1986 and sentenced to life
in prison, in absentia, for ‘‘kidnapping for terrorist ends
that caused the killing of a person’’ for his role in the
death of an American citizen, Leon Klinghoffer;
Whereas a report from the Italian magistrate who tried the
case against Abbas stated that the evidence was ‘‘mul-
tiple, unequivocal, and overwhelming’’ and that his ac-
tions in training and financing for this operation, and in
choosing the target, as well as in planning the escape,
made Abbas guilty of the murder;
•HRES 444 IH
Whereas a warrant for Abbas’ arrest was unsealed in October
1985 charging him with hijacking, and a bounty of
$250,000 was offered for his arrest;
Whereas the Justice Department felt that it did not have the
evidence to convict him, and citing the conviction, albeit
in absentia by the Italian authorities, canceled the war-
rant for his arrest in January 1988; and
Whereas at an April 1996 meeting of the Palestine National
Council in Gaza, Abbas described the killing as ‘‘a mis-
take’’ and that Mr. Klinghoffer was killed because he
‘‘had started to incite the passengers against (the kidnap-
pers)’’: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that the
Attorney General should seek, from the appropriate for-
eign government, the detention and extradition to the
United States of Mohammed Abbas (also known as Abu
Abbas) for the murder of Leon Klinghoffer in October
1985 during the hijacking of the vessel Achille Lauro.
Æ
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2206 
AN ACT 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require 
recipients of State Homeland Security Grant Program 
funding to preserve and strengthen interoperable emer-
gency communications capabilities, and for other pur-
poses. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Wide Interoper-
able Communications Enhancement Act’’ or the ‘‘SWIC 
Enhancement Act’’. 
SEC. 2. MINIMUM CONTENTS OF APPLICATION FOR CER-
TAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 2004(b) 
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 605(b)) 
is amended by— 
(1) redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and 
(2) inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol-
lowing new subparagraph: 
‘‘(B)(i) certification that the Governor of 
the State has designated a Statewide Interoper-
ability Coordinator, including identification in 
such certification of the individual so des-
ignated, who shall be responsible for— 
‘‘(I) coordinating the daily operations 
of the State’s interoperability efforts; 
‘‘(II) coordinating State interoper-
ability and communications projects and 
grant applications for such projects; 
‘‘(III) establishing and maintaining 
working groups to develop and implement 
key interoperability initiatives; and
‘‘(IV) coordinating and updating, as 
necessary, a Statewide Communications 
Interoperability Plan that specifies the cur-
rent status of State efforts to enhance 
communications interoperability within the 
State, including progress, modifications, or 
setbacks, and future goals for communica-
tions interoperability among emergency re-
sponse agencies in the State; or 
‘‘(ii) if a Statewide Interoperability Coordi-
nator has not been designated in accordance 
with clause (i)— 
‘‘(I) certification that the State is per-
forming in another manner the functions 
described in subclauses (I) through (IV) of 
such clause; and 
‘‘(II) identification in such certifi-
cation of an individual who has been des-
ignated by the State as the primary point 
of contact for performance of such func-
tions;’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION.—The amendment 
made by subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any 
grant for which an application was submitted under the
State Homeland Security Grant Program before the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2015. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 2206 
AN ACT 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 
require recipients of State Homeland Security 
Grant 
Program 
funding 
to 
preserve 
and 
strengthen interoperable emergency communica-
tions capabilities, and for other purposes.
H. Res. 445
In the House of Representatives, U.S.,
June 5, 1996.
Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this
resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of
rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee
of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider-
ation of the bill (H.R. 3540) making appropriations for
foreign operations, export financing, and related programs
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dis-
pensed with. Points of order against consideration of the
bill for failure to comply with clause 1(b) of rule X or
clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. General debate shall be
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi-
nority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment
under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered
by title rather than by paragraph. Each title shall be con-
sidered as read. Points of order against provisions in the
•HRES 445 EH
bill for failure to comply with clause 2, 5(b), or 6 of rule
XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with ‘‘: Pro-
vided’’ on page 9, line 12, through ‘‘Appropriations’’ on
line 18; and beginning with ‘‘: Provided’’ on page 13, line
20, through ‘‘relocation’’ on page 14, line 5. Where points
of order are waived against part of a paragraph, points
of order against a provision in another part of such para-
graph may be made only against such provision and not
against the entire paragraph. During consideration of the
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of
the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis
of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record
designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII.
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone
until a time during further consideration in the Committee
of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amend-
ment. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may
reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting
by electronic device on any postponed question that imme-
diately follows another vote by electronic device without
intervening business, provided that the time for voting by
electronic device on the first in any series of questions
shall be not less than fifteen minutes. After the reading
•HRES 445 EH
of the final lines of the bill, a motion that the Committee
of the Whole rise and report the bill to the House with
such amendments as may have been adopted shall, if of-
fered by the majority leader or a designee, have precedence
over a motion to amend. At the conclusion of consideration
of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and
report the bill to the House with such amendments as may
have been adopted. The previous question shall be consid-
ered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
final passage without intervening motion except one mo-
tion to recommit with or without instructions.
Attest:
Clerk.
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2206 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require recipients of State 
Homeland Security Grant Program funding to preserve and strengthen 
interoperable emergency communications capabilities, and for other pur-
poses. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 1, 2015 
Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. MCCAUL, and Ms. 
MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security 
A BILL 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require 
recipients of State Homeland Security Grant Program 
funding to preserve and strengthen interoperable emer-
gency communications capabilities, and for other pur-
poses. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Wide Interoper-
able Communications Enhancement Act’’ or the ‘‘SWIC 
Enhancement Act’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 May 08, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2206.IH
H2206
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 446 EH
SEC. 2. The amendment to the bill considered as
adopted pursuant to the first section of this resolution is
as follows:
In section 1(d) of the bill, strike ‘‘subsection (b)(2)
exceeds the amount described in subsection (b)(1)’’ and
insert in lieu thereof ‘‘subsection (b)(1) exceeds the
amount described in subsection (b)(2)’’.
Attest:
Clerk.