datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
HR 6064 RFS
Sound between Oyster Bay and Rye, New York, con-
necting Nassau and Westchester Counties. 
(5) The bridge was first proposed by Robert 
Moses, the well-known New York City Planner, to 
divert traffic from New York City. Former Governor 
Nelson Rockefeller signed into law legislation cre-
ating the bridge authorized by the New York State 
Legislature in 1967. 
(6) Congressman Wolff, elected in 1964, quick-
ly decided the bridge would be an intrusion in a pris-
tine area, and that Long Island Sound was a very 
precious resource that was despoiled. The conserva-
tion threats in the mid-1960s were suburban devel-
opment, wetland filling, and industrial pollution. The 
fight to preserve this land became an enormous po-
litical fight and is considered to be a turning point 
in New York State’s environmental legacy. 
(7) With State and local political and commu-
nity leaders, and especially the North Shore leaders 
and the Committee to Save the Long Island Sound, 
Congressman Wolff arranged a meeting with De-
partment of the Interior representatives and local 
leaders where the idea of creating a wildlife refuge 
from municipal and privately owned wetlands was 
created. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6064.RFS
H6064
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
HR 6064 RFS
(8) The Town of Oyster Bay, in which one end 
of the bridge was to be located, deeded 5,000 acres 
of wetlands to the United States to be maintained 
as a Federal wildlife preserve. It was stipulated that 
if the Department of the Interior agreed to an intru-
sion of the property, it would revert to the town. 
Creating a Federal wildlife preserve provided the 
land with Federal protection. 
(9) Because of the vision, dedication, and perse-
verance of Congressman Lester Wolff, all of us and 
future generations can enjoy the beauty and mag-
nificence of this refuge. 
SEC. 2. RENAMING THE OYSTER BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
REFUGE AS THE CONGRESSMAN LESTER 
WOLFF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 
(a) RENAMING.—The unit of the National Wildlife 
Refuge System known as the Oyster Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge and located near Oyster Bay, New York, shall be 
known as the ‘‘Congressman Lester Wolff National Wild-
life Refuge’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System 
known as the Oyster Bay National Wildlife Refuge is 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6064.RFS
H6064
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
HR 6064 RFS
deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congressman Lester 
Wolff National Wildlife Refuge’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 
2018. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:39 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6064.RFS
H6064
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
I 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6065 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit eligibility for essential 
air service for certain locations, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 8, 2018 
Mr. WALDEN (for himself and Ms. JENKINS of Kansas) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit eligibility 
for essential air service for certain locations, and for 
other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Essential 
Flights and Ensuring National Security Efforts Act of 
2018’’ or the ‘‘DEFENSE Act of 2018’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:07 Jun 12, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6065.IH
H6065
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 807 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6066 
[Report No. 115–1034] 
A BILL 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve 
the productivity of the management of Depart-
ment of Veterans Affairs health care, and for 
other purposes. 
NOVEMBER 16, 2018 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:28 Nov 16, 2018
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H6066.RH
H6066
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
I 
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6067 
To establish criminal penalties and civil remedies for doping fraud violations 
at major international competitions. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 12, 2018 
Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mr. BURGESS, and Ms. MOORE) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To establish criminal penalties and civil remedies for doping 
fraud violations at major international competitions. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rodchenkov Anti- 
Doping Act of 2018’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) The use of illegal performance-enhancing 
drugs (‘‘doping fraud’’) in major international sport-
ing competitions damages the integrity of sports, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
and often begets other illegal activity, including brib-
ery and money laundering. 
(2) Doping fraud in major international com-
petitions cheats clean athletes, including clean 
United States athletes, and sponsoring corporations, 
including United States corporations, which often 
have anti-doping provisions in their sponsorship con-
tracts. 
(3) The United States is the single largest sov-
ereign contributor to the World Anti-Doping Agency 
(‘‘WADA’’), and thus doping fraud in major inter-
national competitions also effectively defrauds the 
United States. 
(4) Every major international sporting organi-
zation has condemned doping fraud, as has inter-
national law enforcement agencies such as Interpol, 
WADA, and the United Nations. Moreover, a num-
ber of nations, including Germany, Austria, Bel-
gium, Denmark, France, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, 
and Spain, have embraced criminal sanctions for 
doping fraud violations. Thus, action by the United 
States to enhance the international community’s 
fight to protect clean athletes is fully consistent with 
international law. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
(5) State-sponsored-doping systems have been 
revealed, including in Russia by Dr. Grigory 
Rodchenkov, and international federations and 
WADA lack the tools to effectively deter such sys-
tems, which severely magnify the harms to clean 
athletes, including United States athletes, and spon-
soring corporations, including United States cor-
porations. 
(6) Individuals who act as whistleblowers, in-
cluding Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, and make disclo-
sures about doping fraud described above, serve the 
public interest by assisting in the elimination of 
fraud, unveiling of bribery and money laundering, 
and other corrupt practices and should not suffer 
adverse consequences or retaliation. 
(7) Protecting whistleblowers who disclose con-
duct which falls within the purview of this Act is a 
major step toward fair sport. 
(8) Criminal proscriptions are necessary to 
deter doping fraud, even when such conduct occurs 
outside United States territory at major inter-
national competitions, as such conduct has and is in-
tended to have substantial effect on the United 
States, United States citizens, and United States 
sponsoring corporations. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
(9) Athletes who were victimized by doping 
fraud and whistleblowers have heretofore enjoyed 
few remedies against doped athletes, including when 
doping fraud was the cause for them not winning 
medals or placing at the top of various competitions, 
or depriving them of prize monies and financial 
awards for medals or top placement, such that the 
creation of a private right of action is wholly appro-
priate. 
(10) Given that the science of doping detection 
is constantly improving—such that newly devised 
technologies have established new detection methods 
even for past acts of doping fraud—an elongated 
statute of limitations is appropriate. 
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) DOPING FRAUD.—The term ‘‘doping fraud’’ 
means use of any performance-enhancing drug to 
gain an unfair competitive advantage in sports, 
thereby defrauding athletes who are not using per-
formance-enhancing drugs. 
(2) 
PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING
DRUG.—The 
term ‘‘performance-enhancing drug’’ means any sub-
stance—including anabolic agents, peptides, hor-
mones, growth factors, mimetics, Beta–2 agonists, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
and hormone and metabolic modulators, to be speci-
fied by the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
on the basis of scientific and international sports 
standards. 
(3) MAJOR
INTERNATIONAL
COMPETITION.— 
The term ‘‘major international competition’’ means 
any professional or amateur sporting competition, 
including competitions that are comprised of a series 
of bilateral games, in which— 
(A) either— 
(i) four or more United States ath-
letes are contestants; or 
(ii) two or more United States cor-
porations act as corporate sponsors; and 
(B) athletes representing at least three 
countries other than the United States are con-
testants. 
SEC. 4. PROHIBITED ACTS. 
(a) PARTICIPATION IN DOPING FRAUD.—It shall be 
unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionally 
conduct, manage, supervise, direct, abet, or participate in 
doping fraud at or in preparation for any major inter-
national competition. 
(b) ADMINISTRATION OF PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING 
DRUGS.—It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
and intentionally administer, to him or herself, or to any 
other individual, any performance-enhancing drug at or in 
preparation for any major international competition. 
(c) 
PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING
DRUGS
GEN-
ERALLY.—It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly 
and intentionally manufacture, distribute, dispense, or 
possess any performance-enhancing drug with the intent 
to commit or attempt to commit doping fraud at or in 
preparation for any major international competition. 
(d) RETALIATION.—It shall be unlawful for any per-
son to knowingly and intentionally retaliate by taking ad-
verse action against an individual because such individual 
has disclosed evidence of doping fraud, whether such dis-
closures were made to an official governmental or anti- 
doping authority or to the public in general through the 
media. 
(e) CONSPIRACY.—It shall be unlawful for any person 
to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsections 
(a), (b), or (c) of this section. 
(f) JURISDICTION.—Prohibited acts are within the 
jurisdiction of the United States if— 
(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part 
in the United States; or 
(2) the offense is committed outside the United 
States, and— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
(A) the offense is committed in relation to 
a major international competition; or 
(B) the offense occurs in or affects the 
interstate or foreign commerce of the United 
States. 
SEC. 5. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever violates any provision of 
section 4 shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment 
for not more than five years and, if the person is an indi-
vidual, fined $100,000, or $250,000 if the defendant is 
other than an individual. 
(b) CONSPIRACY.—Whoever, as part of a group of 
five or more persons, violates section 4 shall be sentenced 
to a term of imprisonment for not more than ten years 
and, if the person is an individual, fined $250,000, or 
$1,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual. 
(c) SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.—Any property, real 
or personal, used in violation of the provisions of section 
4 may be seized and forfeited to the United States. 
SEC. 6. CIVIL REMEDIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Any person injured in his voca-
tion, business, or property by reason of a violation of sec-
tion 4 may sue therefor in any appropriate United States 
district court. If such person is a prevailing party, he or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
she may recover the cost of the suit, including reasonable 
attorneys’ fees. 
(b) RETALIATION.—Any person who has experienced 
retaliation because of such person’s disclosure of doping 
fraud in any major international competition may sue the 
retaliating party or parties therefor in any appropriate 
United States district court. If such person is a prevailing 
party, he or she may recover the cost of the suit, including 
reasonable attorneys’ fees. 
(c) CONTESTANTS.—Any contestant in a major inter-
national competition who was deprived of a financial 
award or placement in the top three finishers in any major 
international competition by reason of a violation of sec-
tion 4 has a private right of action hereunder, and may 
sue therefor, in any appropriate United States district 
court and, if he or she prevails, shall recover threefold the 
damages sustained, together with the cost of the suit, in-
cluding reasonable attorneys’ fees. 
(d) RETROACTIVITY.—The provisions of subsections 
(a) through (c) shall apply retroactively. 
(e) FINAL JUDGMENT.—A final judgment or decree 
rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal pro-
ceeding brought by the United States under this Chapter 
shall estop the defendant from denying the essential alle-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:53 Jun 14, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6067.IH
H6067
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
(7) the most appropriate ways to promote fi-
nancial inclusion and address the adverse con-
sequences of financial institutions de-risking entire 
categories of high-risk relationships, including char-
ities, embassy accounts, money service businesses (as 
defined under section 1010.100(ff) of title 31, Code 
of Federal Regulations), and correspondent banks; 
(8) the current financial institution reporting 
requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and its 
implementing regulations and guidance; and 
(9) such other items as the Secretary deter-
mines appropriate. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the one year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with law 
enforcement and persons subject to Bank Secrecy Act re-
quirements, shall issue a report to the Congress containing 
all findings and determinations made in carrying out the 
review required under subsection (a). 
SEC. 4. SHARING OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS WITH-
IN A FINANCIAL GROUP. 
(a) IN GENERAL.— 
(1) SHARING WITH FOREIGN BRANCHES AND 
AFFILIATES.—Section 5318(g) of title 31, United 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(5) SHARING WITH FOREIGN BRANCHES, SUB-
SIDIARIES, AND AFFILIATES.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this 
paragraph, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
issue rules permitting any financial institution 
with a reporting obligation under this sub-
section to share information on reports under 
this subsection with the institution’s foreign 
branches, subsidiaries, and affiliates for the 
purposes of combating illicit finance risks, not-
withstanding any other provision of law except 
subparagraph (B). 
‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—In issuing the regula-
tions required under subparagraph (A), the 
Secretary may not permit a financial institution 
to share information on reports under this sub-
section with a foreign branch, subsidiary, or af-
filiate located in a jurisdiction that— 
‘‘(i) is subject to countermeasures im-
posed by the Federal Government; or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
‘‘(ii) the Secretary has determined 
cannot reasonably protect the privacy and 
confidentiality of such information.’’. 
(2) 
NOTIFICATION
PROHIBITIONS.—Section 
5318(g)(2)(A) of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(A) in clause (i), by inserting after ‘‘trans-
action has been reported’’ the following: ‘‘or 
otherwise reveal any information that would re-
veal that the transaction has been reported, in-
cluding materials prepared or used by the fi-
nancial institution for the purpose of identifying 
and detecting potentially suspicious activity’’; 
and 
(B) in clause (ii), by inserting after ‘‘trans-
action has been reported,’’ the following: ‘‘or 
otherwise reveal any information that would re-
veal that the transaction has been reported, in-
cluding materials prepared or used by the fi-
nancial institution for the purpose of identifying 
and detecting potentially suspicious activity,’’. 
(b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than the end of the 
180-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regulations 
to carry out the amendments made by this section. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
SEC. 5. FINCEN NO-ACTION LETTERS. 
Section 310 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) NO-ACTION LETTERS WITH RESPECT TO SPE-
CIFIC CONDUCT.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of FinCEN 
shall issue regulations to establish a process for the 
issuance of a no-action letter by FinCEN in re-
sponse to an inquiry from a person or group of per-
sons concerning the application of the Bank Secrecy 
Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, or any other anti- 
money laundering and counter terrorist financing 
law or regulation to specific conduct, which shall in-
clude a statement as to whether or not FinCEN has 
any intention of taking an enforcement or other reg-
ulatory action against the person or group with re-
spect to such conduct. 
‘‘(2) CONSULTATION.—In issuing the regula-
tions described under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
shall consult with the Federal functional regulators 
and such other Federal departments and agencies as 
the Secretary determines appropriate. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
‘‘(3) RELIANCE ON NO-ACTION LETTER.— 
‘‘(A) 
LIABILITY.—Notwithstanding 
any 
other provisions of law, except for paragraph 
(5)(B), a person described under subparagraph 
(B) who relies upon a no-action letter issued 
under this subsection in accordance with the 
provisions and findings of such letter shall not, 
as a result, be subject to any regulatory action 
or civil or criminal penalty under the Bank Se-
crecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, or any 
other anti-money laundering and counter ter-
rorist financing law or regulation with respect 
to the activity covered in the no-action letter. 
‘‘(B) PERSONS
COVERED.—A person de-
scribed in this paragraph is— 
‘‘(i) any person involved in the specific 
conduct that is the subject of the no-action 
letter; and 
‘‘(ii) any person involved in conduct 
which is indistinguishable in all its mate-
rial aspects from the specific conduct that 
is the subject of the no-action letter. 
‘‘(4) FEES.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Director of 
FinCEN shall develop a system to charge a fee 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
for each request for a no-action letter made 
under this subsection in an amount sufficient, 
in the aggregate, to pay for the cost of carrying 
out this subsection. Such system shall provide 
for a lower fee for small business concerns and 
small financial institutions compared to other 
persons. 
‘‘(B) NOTICE AND COMMENT.—Not later 
than 45 days after the date of the enactment of 
this paragraph, the Director of FinCEN shall 
publish a description of the fee system de-
scribed in subparagraph (A) in the Federal 
Register and shall solicit comments from the 
public for a period of 60 days after publication. 
‘‘(C) FINALIZATION.—The Director of 
FinCEN shall publish a final description of the 
fee system and implement such fee system not 
later than 30 days after the end of the public 
comment period described in subparagraph (B). 
‘‘(5) MODIFYING OR RESCINDING A NO-ACTION 
LETTER.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Director of 
FinCEN may modify or rescind any no-action 
letter issued under this subsection if— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
‘‘(i) in light of changes in statute, reg-
ulations, or policy the letter no longer sets 
forth the interpretation of FinCEN with 
respect to the content of the letter; or 
‘‘(ii) any fact or statement submitted 
in the original inquiry is found to be mate-
rially inaccurate or incomplete. 
‘‘(B) NO RELIANCE ON RESCINDED LET-
TER.—Paragraph (3) shall not apply to the any 
actions taken after the date that a no-action 
letter is rescinded. 
‘‘(C) RETROACTIVE MODIFICATION OR RE-
SCISSION.—A no-action letter may be modified 
or rescinded retroactively only with respect to 
one or more parties to the original inquiry and 
only if the Director of FinCEN determines 
that— 
‘‘(i) a fact or statement in the original 
inquiry was materially inaccurate or in-
complete; 
‘‘(ii) the requestor failed to notify in 
writing FinCEN of a material change to 
any fact or statement in the original re-
quest; or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
‘‘(iii) a party to the original inquiry 
acted in bad faith when relying upon the 
no-action letter. 
‘‘(D) NOTICE OF MODIFICATION AND RE-
SCISSION.—In the case that the Director of 
FinCEN modifies or rescinds a no-action letter 
under this subsection, the Director of FinCEN 
shall— 
‘‘(i) provide notice of such modifica-
tion or rescission; 
‘‘(ii) establish a reasonable time pe-
riod, of not less than 90 days, in which im-
pacted persons may update their anti- 
money laundering programs or processes to 
achieve compliance with the Bank Secrecy 
Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, or any other 
anti-money laundering and counter ter-
rorist financing law or regulation. 
‘‘(6) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub-
section: 
‘‘(A) BANK
SECRECY
ACT.—The term 
‘Bank Secrecy Act’ means— 
‘‘(i) section 21 of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:27 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6068.IH
H6068
SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS