datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3949
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to delegate to the Under Secretary of 
Commerce for International Trade the functions relating to trade adjust-
ment assistance for firms, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mr. GRAVES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to delegate to the Under 
Secretary of Commerce for International Trade the func-
tions relating to trade adjustment assistance for firms, 
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR AD-
JUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS. 
Section 256(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2346(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2007’’ and inserting 
‘‘2012’’.
SEC. 2. DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS TO CARRY OUT THE 
ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) DELEGATION.—Section 256 of the Trade Act of 
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2346) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (a) through (c) 
as subsections (b) through (d), respectively; 
(2) by inserting before subsection (b) (as redes-
ignated) the following: 
‘‘(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Sec-
retary shall delegate all functions of the Secretary under 
this chapter to the Under Secretary of Commerce for 
International Trade.’’; and 
(3) in the heading, by striking ‘‘TO SMALL 
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The item relating 
to section 256 in the table of contents of the Trade Act 
of 1974 is amended to read as follows:
‘‘Sec. 256. Delegation of functions; authorization of appropriations.’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3951
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require notification to Congress 
and the public when waivers to certain domestic source requirements 
are made, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mr. HAYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Armed Services 
A BILL 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require notifica-
tion to Congress and the public when waivers to certain 
domestic source requirements are made, and for other 
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO DOMESTIC SOURCE RE-
QUIREMENTS. 
(a) NOTICE.—Section 2533a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subsection:
‘‘(k) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED WHEN EXCEPTIONS 
APPLIED.—Funds appropriated or otherwise available to 
the Department of Defense may not be used to enter into 
a contract to procure an item described in subsection (b) 
pursuant to an exception in this section (as set forth in 
subsections (c) through (h)) until—
‘‘(1) a notification of the intent to apply such 
exception is submitted to Congress and posted on 
the website maintained by the General Services Ad-
ministration known as FedBizOpps.gov (or any suc-
cessor site); and 
‘‘(2) a period of 15 days has expired after the 
date on which such notification is so submitted and 
published.’’. 
(b) CLOTHING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS COV-
ERED.—Subsection (b) of section 2533a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting 
before the semicolon the following: ‘‘and the materials and 
components thereof’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3952
To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to increase the aggregate 
asset size limitation of the small bank regulatory relief provision, to 
provide for future adjustments of such amount for inflation, and for 
other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mr. HENSARLING (for himself and Mr. BAKER) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 
A BILL 
To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to 
increase the aggregate asset size limitation of the small 
bank regulatory relief provision, to provide for future 
adjustments of such amount for inflation, and for other 
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Community 
Investment Act of 2004’’.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AGGREGATE ASSET SIZE LIMITATION 
OF THE SMALL BANK REGULATORY RELIEF 
PROVISION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 809(a) of the Community 
Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amend-
ed 
by 
striking 
‘‘$250,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$1,000,000,000’’. 
(b) FUTURE ADJUSTMENT OF ASSET SIZE LIMITA-
TION FOR INFLATION.—Section 809 of the Community 
Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2908) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—By January 31 of 2006, 
and the 1st day of each subsequent 1-year period, 
the Federal financial supervisory agencies shall 
jointly prescribe the amount by which the aggregate 
asset size limit described in subsection (a) shall be 
increased by calculating the product of—
‘‘(A) $1,000,000,000; and 
‘‘(B) the ratio of the value of the Personal 
Consumption Expenditures Chain-Type Index 
(or any successor index thereto) published by 
the Department of Commerce, as of December 
31 of the year preceding the year in which the 
adjustment is calculated under this paragraph,
to the value of such index as of the date this 
subsection takes effect. 
‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If the amount determined 
under paragraph (1) for any period is not a multiple 
of $50,000,000 the amount so determined shall be 
rounded to the nearest $50,000,000. 
‘‘(3) PUBLICATION AND REPORT TO THE CON-
GRESS.—Not later than February 15 of any cal-
endar year in which an adjustment is required to be 
calculated under paragraph (1), the Federal finan-
cial supervisory agencies shall jointly—
‘‘(A) publish in the Federal Register the 
amount calculated under such paragraph; and 
‘‘(B) jointly submit a report to the Con-
gress containing the amount described in sub-
paragraph (A).’’.
Æ
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rancho El Cajon
Boundary Reconciliation Act’’.
SEC. 2. RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES, SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
(a) RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES.—
The Secretary of the Interior shall provide compensation
to any landowner whose title to land in lots 1 and 2 of
section 9, township 15 south, range 1 east, San
Bernardino Meridian, in San Diego County, California, is
based on an erroneous survey conducted by a Government
contractor in 1881 and is rendered void because that title
is inferior to the title to the same land established by a
survey of the Rancho El Cajon conducted in 1872 and
approved by the Commissioner of the General Land Office
in 1876.
(b) 
FORMS
OF
COMPENSATION.—Compensation
under subsection (a) shall be mutually agreed upon by the
Secretary and the landowner and shall consist of—
(1) public lands in San Diego or Imperial Coun-
ties, California, selected jointly by the Secretary and
the landowner and conveyed by the Secretary to the
landowner;
(2) a cash payment to the landowner; or
(3) a combination of a conveyance under para-
graph (1) and a cash payment under paragraph (2).
(c) EQUAL VALUE.—Compensation provided under
subsection (a) for a parcel of land whose title was rendered
void, as described in such subsection, may not exceed the
fair market value of the land, as determined by an ap-
praisal satisfactory to the Secretary and the landowner.
(d) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary may make
payments under subsection (a) using funds available to the
Secretary to equalize land exchanges under section 206(b)
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976
(43 U.S.C. 1716(b)).
(e) PUBLIC LANDS DEFINED.—In this section, the
term ‘‘public lands’’ has the meaning given the term in
section 103(e) of the Federal Land Policy and Manage-
ment Act of 1976 (7 U.S.C. 1702(e)).
SEC. 3. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH RE-
SPECT TO LANDS ERRONEOUSLY INCLUDED
IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE,
CALIFORNIA.
(a) REVOCATION.—Public Land Order 3442, dated
August 21, 1964, is revoked insofar as it applies to the
following described lands: San Bernardino Meridian,
T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE1⁄4
of SW1⁄4 in Imperial County, California, aggregating ap-
proximately 140.32 acres.
(b) RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUND-
ARIES.—The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later
than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this
Act—
(1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola Na-
tional Wildlife Refuge, as modified by the revocation
under section 1;
(2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous
signs marking, the boundaries of the refuge deter-
mined in such resurvey; and
(3) prepare and publish a map showing the
boundaries of the refuge.
Passed the House of Representatives September 28,
2004.
Attest:
Clerk.
II 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3954 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 
Received 
AN ACT 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to resolve bound-
ary discrepancies in San Diego County, California, aris-
ing from an erroneous survey conducted by a Govern-
ment contractor in 1881 that resulted in overlapping 
boundaries for certain lands, and for other purposes.
HR 3954 RDS 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rancho El Cajon 
Boundary Reconciliation Act’’. 
SEC. 2. RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES, SAN 
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES.— 
The Secretary of the Interior shall provide compensation 
to any landowner whose title to land in lots 1 and 2 of 
section 9, township 15 south, range 1 east, San 
Bernardino Meridian, in San Diego County, California, is 
based on an erroneous survey conducted by a Government 
contractor in 1881 and is rendered void because that title 
is inferior to the title to the same land established by a 
survey of the Rancho El Cajon conducted in 1872 and 
approved by the Commissioner of the General Land Office 
in 1876. 
(b) 
FORMS
OF
COMPENSATION.—Compensation 
under subsection (a) shall be mutually agreed upon by the 
Secretary and the landowner and shall consist of— 
(1) public lands in San Diego or Imperial Coun-
ties, California, selected jointly by the Secretary and 
the landowner and conveyed by the Secretary to the 
landowner;
HR 3954 RDS 
(2) a cash payment to the landowner; or 
(3) a combination of a conveyance under para-
graph (1) and a cash payment under paragraph (2). 
(c) EQUAL VALUE.—Compensation provided under 
subsection (a) for a parcel of land whose title was rendered 
void, as described in such subsection, may not exceed the 
fair market value of the land, as determined by an ap-
praisal satisfactory to the Secretary and the landowner. 
(d) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary may make 
payments under subsection (a) using funds available to the 
Secretary to equalize land exchanges under section 206(b) 
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 
(43 U.S.C. 1716(b)). 
(e) PUBLIC LANDS DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘public lands’’ has the meaning given the term in 
section 103(e) of the Federal Land Policy and Manage-
ment Act of 1976 (7 U.S.C. 1702(e)). 
SEC. 3. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH RE-
SPECT TO LANDS ERRONEOUSLY INCLUDED 
IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
CALIFORNIA. 
(a) REVOCATION.—Public Land Order 3442, dated 
August 21, 1964, is revoked insofar as it applies to the 
following described lands: San Bernardino Meridian, 
T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE1⁄4
HR 395 RDS 
SEC. 3. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION DO-NOT-
CALL REGULATIONS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
issue a final rule pursuant to the rulemaking proceeding 
that it began on September 18, 2002, under the Telephone 
Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227 et seq.). In 
issuing such rule, the Federal Communications Commis-
sion shall consult and coordinate with the Federal Trade 
Commission to maximize consistency with the rule promul-
gated by the Federal Trade Commission (16 CFR 
310.4(b)). 
SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) REPORT
ON REGULATORY COORDINATION.—
Within 45 days after the promulgation of a final rule by 
the Federal Communications Commission as required by 
section 3, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal 
Communications Commission shall each transmit to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report which 
shall include— 
(1) an analysis of the telemarketing rules pro-
mulgated by both the Federal Trade Commission 
and the Federal Communications Commission;
HR 3954 RDS 
of SW1⁄4 in Imperial County, California, aggregating ap-
proximately 140.32 acres. 
(b) RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUND-
ARIES.—The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later 
than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act— 
(1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola Na-
tional Wildlife Refuge, as modified by the revocation 
under section 1; 
(2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous 
signs marking, the boundaries of the refuge deter-
mined in such resurvey; and 
(3) prepare and publish a map showing the 
boundaries of the refuge. 
Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 
2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
IB 
Union Calendar No. 391
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3954
[Report No. 108–647] 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to resolve boundary discrepancies 
in San Diego County, California, arising from an erroneous survey con-
ducted by a Government contractor in 1881 that resulted in overlapping 
boundaries for certain lands, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 11, 2004] 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to resolve bound-
ary discrepancies in San Diego County, California, aris-
ing from an erroneous survey conducted by a Govern-
ment contractor in 1881 that resulted in overlapping 
boundaries for certain lands, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rancho El Cajon 
Boundary Reconciliation Act’’. 
SEC. 2. RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES, SAN 
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) RESOLUTION
OF BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES.—
The Secretary of the Interior shall provide compensation 
to any landowner whose title to land in lots 1 and 2 of 
section 9, township 15 south, range 1 east, San Bernardino 
Meridian, in San Diego County, California, is based on 
an erroneous survey conducted by a Government contractor 
in 1881 and is rendered void because that title is inferior 
to the title to the same land established by a survey of the 
Rancho El Cajon conducted in 1872 and approved by the 
Commissioner of the General Land Office in 1876. 
(b) FORMS OF COMPENSATION.—Compensation under 
subsection (a) shall be mutually agreed upon by the Sec-
retary and the landowner and shall consist of—
(1) public lands in San Diego or Imperial Coun-
ties, California, selected jointly by the Secretary and 
the landowner and conveyed by the Secretary to the 
landowner; 
(2) a cash payment to the landowner; or
(3) a combination of a conveyance under para-
graph (1) and a cash payment under paragraph (2). 
(c) EQUAL VALUE.—Compensation provided under 
subsection (a) for a parcel of land whose title was rendered 
void, as described in such subsection, may not exceed the 
fair market value of the land, as determined by an ap-
praisal satisfactory to the Secretary and the landowner. 
(d) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary may make 
payments under subsection (a) using funds available to the 
Secretary to equalize land exchanges under section 206(b) 
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 
(43 U.S.C. 1716(b)). 
(e) PUBLIC LANDS DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘public lands’’ has the meaning given the term in sec-
tion 103(e) of the Federal Land Policy and Management 
Act of 1976 (7 U.S.C. 1702(e)).
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 395
To authorize the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees for the implemen-
tation and enforcement of a ‘‘do-not-call’’ registry, and for other pur-
poses. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 28, 2003
Mr. TAUZIN (for himself and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To authorize the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees 
for the implementation and enforcement of a ‘‘do-not-
call’’ registry, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Do-Not-Call Imple-
mentation Act’’. 
SEC. 2. TELEMARKETING SALES RULE; DO-NOT-CALL REG-
ISTRY FEES. 
The Federal Trade Commission may promulgate reg-
ulations establishing fees sufficient to implement and en-
Union Calendar No. 391
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3954
[Report No. 108–647] 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to resolve 
boundary discrepancies in San Diego County, 
California, arising from an erroneous survey con-
ducted by a Government contractor in 1881 that 
resulted in overlapping boundaries for certain 
lands, and for other purposes. 
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3956
To designate Poland as a program country under the visa waiver program 
established under section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To designate Poland as a program country under the visa 
waiver program established under section 217 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 
The Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) Since the founding of the United States, 
Poland has proven its steadfast dedication to the 
causes of freedom and friendship with the United 
States, exemplified by the brave actions of Polish pa-
triots such as Casimir Pulaski and Tadeusz 
Kosciuszko during the American Revolution.
(2) Polish history provides pioneering examples 
of constitutional democracy and religious tolerance. 
(3) The United States is home to nearly 
9,000,000 people of Polish ancestry. 
(4) Polish immigrants have contributed greatly 
to the success of industry and agriculture in the 
United States. 
(5) Since the demise of communism, Poland has 
become a stable, democratic nation. 
(6) Poland has adopted economic policies that 
promote free markets and rapid economic growth. 
(7) On March 12, 1999, Poland demonstrated 
its commitment to global security by becoming a 
member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 
(8) On May 1, 2004, Poland will become a 
member State of the European Union. 
(9) Poland was a staunch ally to the United 
States during Operation Iraqi Freedom. 
(10) Poland has committed 2,300 soldiers to 
help with ongoing peacekeeping efforts in Iraq. 
(11) The Secretary of Homeland Security and 
Secretary of State administer the visa waiver pro-
gram, which allows citizens from 27 countries, in-
cluding France and Germany, to visit the United 
States as tourists without visas.
(12) On April 15, 1991, Poland unilaterally re-
pealed the visa requirement for United States citi-
zens traveling to Poland for 90 days or less. 
(13) More than 100,000 Polish citizens visit the 
United States each year. 
SEC. 2. RENDERING POLAND VISA WAIVER PROGRAM 
COUNTRY. 
Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and notwithstanding section 217(c) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)), Poland shall be 
deemed a designated program country for purposes of the 
visa waiver program established under section 217 of such 
Act.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3957
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade adjustment assistance 
to certain service workers. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 11, 2004
Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade adjustment 
assistance to certain service workers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSIST-
ANCE TO SERVICES SECTOR. 
(a) ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS.—Sec-
tion 221(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2271(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘firm)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘firm, and workers in a service sector firm or subdivi-
sion of a service sector firm’’.
(b) GROUP ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section 
222 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272) is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 
by striking ‘‘agricultural firm)’’ and inserting 
‘‘agricultural firm, and workers in a service sec-
tor firm or subdivision of a service sector 
firm)’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2)—
(i) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by strik-
ing ‘‘like or directly competitive with arti-
cles produced’’ and inserting ‘‘or services 
like or directly competitive with articles 
produced or services provided’’; and 
(ii) by inserting after subparagraph 
(B) the following: 
‘‘(C)(i) there has been a shift, by such 
workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign coun-
try, in provision of services like or directly com-
petitive with services which are provided by 
such firm or subdivision; or 
‘‘(ii) such workers’ firm or subdivision has 
obtained or is likely to obtain services described 
in clause (i) from a foreign country’’;
(2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘agricultural firm)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘agricultural firm, and workers in a service 
sector firm or subdivision of a service sector firm)’’; 
and 
(3) in subsection (c)(3)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘(or subdivision)’’ after 
‘‘such other firm’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘, if the certification’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘Mexico’’. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—Section 247 of the Trade Act of 
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2319) is amended by inserting after 
paragraph (6) the following: 
‘‘(7) The term ‘service sector firm’ means an 
entity engaged in the business of providing informa-
tion technology or other high technology services.’’.
Æ