datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(H) Encouraging replication of best prac-
tices and model programs to promote geo-
graphic literacy. 
‘‘(I) Developing and disseminating effec-
tive, research-based geography learning mate-
rials. 
‘‘(J) Convening State-based conferences to 
assess the state of geographic literacy and to 
identify strategies for improvement. 
‘‘SEC. 275. APPLICATIONS. 
‘‘(a) GRANTEE APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible to re-
ceive a grant under this part, a grantee shall submit to 
the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, 
and accompanied by such information as the Secretary 
may require. 
‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE RECIPIENT APPLICATIONS.— 
‘‘(1) SUBMISSION.—To be eligible to receive a 
subgrant under this part, an eligible recipient shall 
submit an application to a grantee at such time, in 
such manner and accompanied by such information 
as the grantee may require. 
‘‘(2) REVIEW.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A grantee shall invite 
individuals described in subparagraph (B) to re-
view all applications from eligible recipients for 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:51 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H822.IH
H822
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
a subgrant under this section and to make rec-
ommendations to the grantee regarding the ap-
proval of the applications. 
‘‘(B) REVIEWERS.—The individuals re-
ferred to in subparagraph (A) are the following: 
‘‘(i) Leaders in the field of geography 
education. 
‘‘(ii) Such other individuals as the 
grantee may determine are necessary or 
desirable. 
‘‘SEC. 276. REQUIREMENTS. 
‘‘(a) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—A grantee receiving 
a grant under this part for a fiscal year, and each eligible 
recipient receiving a subgrant under this part for a fiscal 
year, may use not more than 15 percent of the funds made 
available through the grant or subgrant, respectively, for 
administrative costs. 
‘‘(b) MATCHING REQUIREMENTS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to be eligible to 
receive a subgrant under this part an eligible recipi-
ent shall agree in the application submitted under 
section 275(b) to provide matching funds towards 
the costs of the activities assisted under the 
subgrant. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:51 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H822.IH
H822
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) AMOUNT.—An eligible recipient shall pro-
vide matching funds in an amount equal to 20 per-
cent of the subgrant funds received under this part 
for the second and each succeeding fiscal year for 
which subgrant payments are made. 
‘‘(3) SOURCE OF MATCHING FUNDS.—Matching 
funds may be provided in cash or in kind, fairly 
evaluated, including facilities, staffing salaries, and 
educational materials. 
‘‘SEC. 277. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this part $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 and each of 
the 4 succeeding fiscal years.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:51 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H822.IH
H822
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) in the case of a quarter before the target- 
attainment quarter, the number equal to— 
(A) the total number of Federal employees 
determined for the baseline quarter, reduced by 
(B) 2⁄3 of the number of Federal employees 
separating from agencies during the period— 
(i) beginning on the first day fol-
lowing the baseline quarter; and 
(ii) ending on the last day of the 
quarter to which the applicable maximum 
is being applied; and 
(2) in the case of the target-attainment quarter 
and any subsequent quarter, the number equal to 90 
percent of the total number of Federal employees as 
of September 30, 2012. 
(c) TARGET-ATTAINMENT QUARTER.—For purposes 
of this Act, the term ‘‘target-attainment quarter’’ means 
the earlier of— 
(1) the first quarter (subsequent to the baseline 
quarter) for which the total number of Federal em-
ployees does not exceed 90 percent of the total num-
ber of Federal employees as of September 30, 2012; 
or 
(2) the quarter ending on September 30, 2015. 
(d) METHOD FOR ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:52 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H824.IH
H824
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 825 
To exclude from consideration as income under the United States Housing 
Act of 1937 payments of pension made under section 1521 of title 
38, United States Code, to veterans who are in need of regular aid 
and attendance. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 
Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. CAP-
ITO, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. 
BARBER, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. KILMER, Mr. GARDNER, and Mr. CARNEY) 
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Fi-
nancial Services 
A BILL 
To exclude from consideration as income under the United 
States Housing Act of 1937 payments of pension made 
under section 1521 of title 38, United States Code, to 
veterans who are in need of regular aid and attendance. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vulnerable Veterans 
Housing Reform Act of 2013’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:52 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H825.IH
H825
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME. 
Paragraph (4) of section 3(b) of the United States 
Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(4)) is amend-
ed— 
(1) by striking ‘‘and any amounts’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘, any amounts’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘or any deferred’’ and inserting 
‘‘, any deferred’’; and 
(3) by inserting after ‘‘prospective monthly 
amounts’’ the following: ‘‘, and any expenses related 
to aid and attendance as detailed under section 1521 
of title 38, United States Code’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:52 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H825.IH
H825
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 826 
To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from taking any action to establish 
a restricted area prohibiting public access to waters downstream of a 
dam, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 
Mr. WHITFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from taking any action 
to establish a restricted area prohibiting public access 
to waters downstream of a dam, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom to Fish Act 
of 2013’’. 
SEC. 2. RESTRICTED AREAS AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
DAMS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army, acting 
through the Chief of Engineers, shall not take any action 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:16 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H826.IH
H826
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
to establish a restricted area prohibiting public access to 
waters downstream of a dam owned by the Corps of Engi-
neers. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 
this section shall apply to an action described in sub-
section (a) on or after August 1, 2012. 
(2) EXISTING RESTRICTIONS.—If the Secretary 
of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
has taken an action described in subsection (a) dur-
ing the period beginning on August 1, 2012, and 
ending on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall— 
(A) cease implementing the restricted area 
resulting from the action; and 
(B) remove any barriers constructed in 
connection with the restricted area. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:16 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H826.IH
H826
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 828 
To rescind $45 billion of unobligated discretionary appropriations, and for 
other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 
Mr. PRICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. WIL-
SON of South Carolina, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. FLORES, 
Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. JONES, and Mr. SCALISE) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appro-
priations 
A BILL 
To rescind $45 billion of unobligated discretionary 
appropriations, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decrease Spending 
Now Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H828.IH
H828
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED DISCRETIONARY AP-
PROPRIATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Of the unobligated balances of 
discretionary appropriations on the date of enactment of 
this Act, $45,000,000,000 is rescinded. 
(b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall determine which ap-
propriation accounts the rescission under subsection 
(a) shall apply to and the amount that each such ac-
count shall be reduced by pursuant to such rescis-
sion. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 
the Office of Management and Budget shall submit 
a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Con-
gress listing the accounts reduced by the rescission 
in subsection (a) and the amounts rescinded from 
each such account. 
(c) EXCEPTIONS.—The rescission under subsection 
(a) shall not apply to the Department of Defense, the De-
partment of Veterans Affairs, or the Social Security Ad-
ministration. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H828.IH
H828
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 829 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of Illabot 
Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National 
Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 
Ms. DELBENE (for herself and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 
a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Wash-
ington, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 
Rivers System. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 
SEGMENTS. 
Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(ll) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H829.IH
H829
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the 
headwaters of Illabot Creek to the northern ter-
minus as generally depicted on the map titled 
‘Illabot Creek Proposed WSR-Northern Ter-
minus’, dated September 15, 2009, to be ad-
ministered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
follows: 
‘‘(i) The 4.3-mile segment from the 
headwaters of Illabot Creek to the bound-
ary of Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a 
wild river. 
‘‘(ii) The 10-mile segment from the 
boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to 
the northern terminus as generally de-
picted on the map titled ‘Illabot Creek 
Proposed WSR-Northern Terminus’, dated 
September 15, 2009, as a recreational 
river. 
‘‘(B) Action required to be taken under 
subsection (d)(1) for the river segments des-
ignated under this paragraph shall be com-
pleted through revision of the Skagit Wild and 
Scenic 
River 
comprehensive 
management 
plan.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H829.IH
H829
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
reason to believe that the individual unlawfully 
brought into the United States will commit an of-
fense against the United States or any State that is 
punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year, 
be fined under title 18, United States Code, and im-
prisoned, in the case of a first or second violation, 
not less than 3 nor more than 10 years, and for any 
other violation, not less than 5 nor more than 15 
years; 
‘‘(vi) if the offense is a violation of paragraphs 
(1)(A)(ii), (iii), or (iv), or paragraph (1)(B), and 
was committed for the purpose of profit, commercial 
advantage, or private financial gain, be fined under 
title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more 
than 10 years, or both; 
‘‘(vii) if the offense involves the transit of the 
defendant’s spouse, child, sibling, parent, grand-
parent, or niece or nephew, and the offense is not 
described in any of clauses (i) through (vi), be fined 
under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned 
not more than 1 year, or both; and 
‘‘(viii) in any other case, be fined under title 
18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more 
than 5 years, or both. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:56 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H830.IH
H830
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
114TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5019 
AN ACT 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide 
a safe harbor related to certain investment fund research 
reports, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2607
AN ACT
Making appropriations for the government of the
District of Columbia and other activities charge-
able in whole or in part against the revenues of
said District for the fiscal year ending September
30, 1998, and for other purposes.
‘‘(ii) the phaseout range is $20,000. 
‘‘(B) OTHER RETURNS.—In the case of— 
‘‘(i) a head of a household (as defined 
in section 2(b)), the applicable dollar 
amount and the phaseout range shall be 3⁄4 
of the amounts applicable under subpara-
graph (A) (as adjusted under paragraph 
(4)), and 
‘‘(ii) any taxpayer who is not filing a 
joint return and who is not a head of a 
household (as so defined), the applicable 
dollar amount and the phaseout range 
shall be 1⁄2 of the amounts applicable 
under subparagraph (A) (as so adjusted). 
‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF APPLICABLE 
DOLLAR AMOUNT.—In the case of any taxable year 
beginning in a calendar year after 2014, the dollar 
amount in paragraph (3)(A)(i) shall be increased by 
an amount equal to— 
‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter-
mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 
year in which the taxable year begins, deter-
mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2013’ for 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:18 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H837.IH
H837
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2607
AN ACT
Making appropriations for the government of the District
of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole
or in part against the revenues of said District for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other
purposes.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECTS AND 
ACTIVITIES UNDER THE LOWER RIO GRANDE 
WATER CONSERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT 
PROGRAM. 
(a) ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.—Section 4(a) of the 
Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Resources Conservation 
and Improvement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–576; 114 
Stat. 3067) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(20) In Cameron County, Texas, Bayview Irri-
gation District No. 11, water conservation and im-
provement projects as identified in the March 3, 
2004, engineering report by NRS Consulting Engi-
neers at a cost of $1,425,219. 
‘‘(21) In the Cameron County, Texas Harlingen 
Irrigation District No. 1, water conservation and im-
provement projects as identified in the March 2004 
engineering report by Axiom-Blair Engineering at a 
cost of $5,133,432.00. 
‘‘(22) In the Cameron County, Texas, Cameron 
County Irrigation District No. 2, water conservation 
and improvement projects as identified in the Feb-
ruary 11, 2004, engineering report by NRS Con-
sulting Engineers at a cost of $8,269,576. 
‘‘(23) In the Cameron County, Texas, Cameron 
County Irrigation District No. 6, water conservation 
and improvement projects as identified in an engi-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H832.IH
H832
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
neering report by Turner Collie Braden, Inc., at a 
cost of $5,607,300. 
‘‘(24) In the Cameron County, Texas, Adams 
Gardens Irrigation District No. 19, water conserva-
tion and improvement projects as identified in the 
March 2004 engineering report by Axiom-Blair En-
gineering at a cost of $3,025,000. 
‘‘(25) In the Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, 
Texas, Hidalgo and Cameron Counties Irrigation 
District No. 9, water conservation and improvement 
projects as identified by the February 11 engineer-
ing report by NRS Consulting Engineers at a cost 
of $8,929,152. 
‘‘(26) In the Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, 
Texas, Delta Lake Irrigation District, water con-
servation and improvement projects as identified in 
the March 2004 engineering report by Axiom-Blair 
Engineering at a cost of $8,000,000. 
‘‘(27) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo 
County Irrigation District No. 2, water conservation 
and improvement projects identified in the engineer-
ing reports attached to a letter dated February 11, 
2004, from the district’s general manager, and the 
renovation of a pumping plant for flood protection 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H832.IH
H832
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
identified in by Sigler, Winston, Greenwood Associ-
ates at a cost of $13,117,710. 
‘‘(28) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo 
County Irrigation District No. 1, water conservation 
and improvement projects identified in an engineer-
ing report dated March 5, 2004, by Melden and 
Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $5,595,018. 
‘‘(29) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo 
County Irrigation District No. 6, water conservation 
and improvement projects as identified in the March 
2004 engineering report by Axiom-Blair Engineering 
at a cost of $3,450,000. 
‘‘(30) In the Hidalgo County, Texas Santa 
Cruz Irrigation District No. 15, water conservation 
and improvement projects as identified in an engi-
neering report dated March 5, 2004, by Melden and 
Hunt at a cost of $4,609,000. 
‘‘(31) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Engelman 
Irrigation District, water conservation and improve-
ment projects as identified in an engineering report 
dated March 5, 2004, by Melden and Hunt, Inc. at 
a cost of $2,251,480. 
‘‘(32) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Valley 
Acres Water District, water conservation and im-
provement projects as identified in an engineering 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H832.IH
H832
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 831 
To phase out special wage certificates under the Fair Labor Standards Act 
of 1938 under which individuals with disabilities may be employed at 
subminimum wage rates. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 
Mr. HARPER (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. CON-
YERS, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. MOORE, Ms. NOR-
TON, Mr. RUSH, Mr. TONKO, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. CLYBURN) 
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To phase out special wage certificates under the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 under which individuals with 
disabilities may be employed at subminimum wage rates. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Wages for Work-
ers with Disabilities Act of 2013’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H831.IH
H831
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
report dated March 2004 by Axiom-Blair Engineer-
ing at a cost of $500,000. 
‘‘(33) 
In 
the 
Hudspeth 
County, 
Texas, 
Hudspeth County Conservation and Reclamation 
District No. 1, water conservation and improvement 
projects as identified in the March 2004 engineering 
report by Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of 
$1,500,000. 
‘‘(34) In the El Paso County, Texas, El Paso 
County Water Improvement District No. 1, water 
conservation and improvement projects as identified 
in the March 2004 engineering report by Axiom- 
Blair Engineering at a cost of $10,500,000. 
‘‘(35) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo 
County Irrigation District No. 16, water conserva-
tion and improvement projects identified in an engi-
neering report dated March 22, 2004, by Melden 
and Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $2,800,000. 
‘‘(36) The United Irrigation District of Hidalgo 
County 
water 
conservation 
and 
improvement 
projects as identified in a March 2004 engineering 
report by Sigler Winston, Greenwood and Associates 
at a cost of $6,067,021.’’. 
(b) INCLUSION OF ACTIVITIES TO CONSERVE WATER 
OR IMPROVE SUPPLY; TRANSFERS AMONG PROJECTS.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:17 Mar 01, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H832.IH
H832
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS