for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project. 
(2) HAINES
SMALL
BOAT
HARBOR, HAINES, 
ALASKA.—The project for navigation, Haines Small 
Boat Harbor, Haines, Alaska: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total of 
$12,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$9,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,500,000. 
(3) TANQUE
VERDE
CREEK, 
ARIZONA.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde 
Creek, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $4,978,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $3,236,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $1,742,000. 
(4) VA SHILY’ AY AKIMEL, SALT RIVER RESTORA-
TION, ARIZONA.—The project for ecosystem restora-
tion, Va Shily’ Ay Akimel, Salt River, Arizona: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, 
at a total cost of $138,968,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $90,129,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $48,839,000. 
(5) HAMILTON CITY, CALIFORNIA.—The project 
for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, 
Hamilton City, California: Report of the Chief of En-
gineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$50,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$33,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of 
$17,600,000. 
(6) IMPERIAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA.—The project 
for storm damage reduction, Imperial Beach, Cali-
fornia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Decem-
ber 30, 2003, at a total cost of $11,862,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $7,592,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $4,270,000, and at an estimated 
total cost of $38,004,000 for periodic beach nourish-
ment over the 50-year life of the project, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $19,002,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $19,002,000. 
(7) MATILIJA
DAM, VENTURA
COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—The 
project 
for 
ecosystem 
restoration, 
Matilija Dam and Ventura River Watershed, Ventura 
County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of 
$130,335,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$78,973,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$51,362,000. 
(8) MIDDLE
CREEK, 
LAKE
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—The project for ecosystem restoration and 
flood damage reduction, Middle Creek, Lake County,
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated No-
vember 29, 2004, at a total cost of $41,793,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $27,256,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $14,537,000. 
(9) NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH, CALIFORNIA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for ecosystem 
restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh, Nap River, 
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$100,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$64,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $36,500,000. 
(B) PROJECT FEATURES.—In carrying out 
the project, the Secretary shall include construc-
tion of a recycled water pipeline extending from 
the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District 
Waste Water Treatment Plant and the Napa 
Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment 
Plant as part of the project and restoration and 
enhancement of Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, and 3. 
(10) SOUTH
PLATTE
RIVER, DENVER, COLO-
RADO.—The project for environmental restoration 
Denver County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, 
Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 
16, 2003, at a total cost of $18,824,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $12,236,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $6,588,000. 
(11) MIAMI
HARBOR, 
MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for naviga-
tion, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Flor-
ida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 
25, 2005, at a total cost of $121,127,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $64,843,000 and an es-
timated non-Federal cost of $56,284,000. 
(B) GENERAL
REEVALUATION
REPORT.—
The non-Federal share of the cost of the general 
reevaluation report that resulted in the report of 
the Chief of Engineers referred to in subpara-
graph (A) shall be the same percentage as the 
non-Federal share of cost of construction of the 
project. 
(C) 
AGREEMENT.—The 
Secretary 
shall 
enter into a new partnership with the non-Fed-
eral interest to reflect the cost sharing required 
by subparagraph (B). 
(12) EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS.—
The project for ecosystem restoration, East St. Louis 
and vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engi-
neers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of
$191,158,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$123,807,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$67,351,000. 
(13) 
PEORIA
RIVERFRONT, 
ILLINOIS.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Peoria River-
front, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
July 28, 2003, at a total cost of $16,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $10,400,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $5,600,000. 
(14) BAYOU
SORREL
LOCK, LOUISIANA.—The 
project for navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: 
Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 
2005, at a total cost of $9,000,000. The costs of con-
struction of the project shall be paid 1⁄2 from amounts 
appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury 
and 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund. 
(15) MORGANZA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LOU-
ISIANA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for hurricane 
and storm damage reduction, Morganza to the 
Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the Chief 
of Engineers, dated August 23, 2002, and July 
22, 2003, at a total cost of $788,000,000 with an
estimated Federal cost of $512,200,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $275,800,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of design and construction work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is inte-
gral to the project. 
(16) SWOPE
PARK
INDUSTRIAL
AREA, 
MIS-
SOURI.—The project for flood damage reduction, 
Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: Report of the 
Chief of Engineers, dated December 30, 2003, at a 
total cost of $15,683,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $10,194,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $5,489,000. 
(17) MANASQUAN
TO
BARNEGAT
INLET, NEW 
JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and storm dam-
age reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat Inlet, New 
Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Decem-
ber 30, 2003, at a total cost of $65,800,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $42,800,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $23,000,000, and at an es-
timated total cost of $108,000,000 for periodic beach 
nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with
an estimated Federal cost of $54,000,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $54,000,000. 
(18) SOUTH RIVER, NEW JERSEY.—The project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction and envi-
ronmental restoration, South River, New Jersey: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003, 
at a total cost of $112,623,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $73,205,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $39,418,000. 
(19) SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW 
MEXICO.—The project for flood damage reduction, 
Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico: Report 
of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at 
a total cost of $19,494,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $12,671,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $6,823,000. 
(20) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS 
CHRISTI, TEXAS.—The project for navigation and en-
vironmental restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Chan-
nel, Texas, Channel Improvement Project: Report of 
the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total 
cost of $172,940,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $80,086,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$92,823,000.
(21) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, HIGH IS-
LAND
TO
BRAZOS
RIVER, TEXAS.—The project for 
navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Sabine 
River to Corpus Christi, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers, dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
$13,104,000. The costs of construction of the project 
are to be paid 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from 
the general fund of the Treasury and 
1⁄2 from 
amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund. 
(22) MATAGORDA BAY, TEXAS.—The project for 
navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos 
River to Port O’Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, 
Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Decem-
ber 24, 2002, at a total cost of $15,960,000. The costs 
of construction of the project are to be paid 1⁄2 from 
amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
Treasury and 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from 
the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
(23) RIVERSIDE OXBOW, FORT WORTH, TEXAS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for environ-
mental 
restoration, 
Riverside 
Oxbow, 
Fort 
Worth, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated May 29, 2003, at a total cost of 
$25,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$10,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $14,800,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of design and construction work 
carried out on the Beach Street Dam and associ-
ated features by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work 
is integral to the project. 
(24) DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.—The 
project for the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge 
Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated March 3, 2003, 
at a Federal cost of $35,573,000. 
(25) 
CHEHALIS
RIVER, 
CENTRALIA, 
WASH-
INGTON.—
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The project for flood 
damage reduction, Chehalis River, Centralia, 
Washington: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated September 27, 2004, at a total cost of 
$109,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$66,425,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $43,425,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall—