265 
intersection with the United States Government pier-head 
line; to the northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
northwesterly; thence southwesterly along said northwest-
erly line of Bryant Street produced to the point of begin-
ning. 
(c) REQUIREMENT THAT AREA BE IMPROVED.—The 
declaration of nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies 
only to those parts of the area described in subsection (b) 
that are or will be bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied 
by permanent structures and does not affect the applica-
bility of any Federal statute or regulation applicable to 
such parts the day before the date of enactment of this 
Act, including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 
1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly 
known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 
1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
(d) EXPIRATION DATE.—If, 20 years from the date 
of enactment of this Act, any area or part thereof de-
scribed in subsection (b) is not bulkheaded or filled or oc-
cupied by permanent structures, including marina facili-
ties, in accordance with the requirements set out in sub-
section (c), or if work in connection with any activity per-
mitted in subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years
266 
after issuance of such permits, then the declaration of 
nonnavigability for such area or part thereof shall expire. 
SEC. 5042. SANTA VENETIA, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out a 
project for flood damage reduction under section 205 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 701s), Santa 
Venetia, California, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible. 
(b) PROJECT
FINANCING.—In carrying out the 
project under this section, the Secretary shall allow the 
non-Federal interests to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), to the 
extent that the Secretary’s evaluation indicates that apply-
ing such section is necessary to implement the project. 
SEC. 5043. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) REEVALUATION.—The Secretary shall reevaluate 
the feasibility of the Lower Mosher Slough element and 
the levee extensions on the Upper Calaveras River element 
of the project for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan 
Area, California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for re-
imbursement under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
701b–13).
267 
(b) SPECIAL RULES FOR REEVALUATION.—In con-
ducting the reevaluation under subsection (a), the Sec-
retary shall not reject a feasibility determination based on 
one or more of the policies of the Corps of Engineers con-
cerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
the amount of runoff. 
(c) REIMBURSEMENT.—If the Secretary determines 
that the elements referred to subsection (a) are feasible, 
the Secretary shall reimburse, subject to appropriations, 
the non-Federal interest under section 211 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share 
of the cost of such elements. 
SEC. 5044. VICTOR V. VEYSEY DAM, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The Prado Dam, authorized by 
the Flood Control Act of 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), shall be 
known and designated as the ‘‘Victor V. Veysey Dam’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Victor V. Veysey Dam’’. 
SEC. 5045. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, 
NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CONNECTICUT. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The western breakwater for the 
project for navigation, New Haven Harbor, Connecticut, 
authorized by the first section of the Act of September
268 
19, 1890 (26 Stat. 426), shall be known and designated 
as the ‘‘Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the breakwater referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles Hervey 
Townshend Breakwater’’. 
SEC. 5046. CHRISTINA RIVER SHIPWRECK, DELAWARE. 
The Secretary may carry out the removal of the de-
bris associated with the steamship ‘‘STATE OF PENN-
SYLVANIA’’ and other derelict vessels from the Christina 
River, Delaware, under section 202 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2945). 
SEC. 5047. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVE-
MENTS. 
Section 109(e)(2) of division B of the Miscellaneous 
Appropriations Act, 2001 (enacted into law by Public Law 
106–554) (114 Stat. 2763A–222) is amended by adding 
at the end the following: 
‘‘(C) CREDIT FOR WORK PRIOR TO EXECU-
TION OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.—The 
Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project (i) the cost of 
construction work carried out by the non-Fed-
eral interest before the date of the partnership
269 
agreement for the project if the Secretary de-
termines that the work is integral to the 
project; and (ii) the cost of land acquisition car-
ried out by the non-Federal interest for projects 
to be carried out under this section.’’. 
SEC. 5048. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for 
the Lake Worth bulkhead replacement project, West Palm 
Beach, Florida, at an estimated total cost of $9,000,000. 
SEC. 5049. LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA. 
The Secretary may assist local interests with plan-
ning, design, and construction of facilities at the Lake La-
nier Olympic Center, Georgia, at a total cost of 
$5,300,000. 
SEC. 5050. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO. 
The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley 
Creek Recreation Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls 
Management Plan, dated October 2001, for the Riley 
Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner Coun-
ty, Idaho. 
SEC. 5051. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS FLOOD PROTEC-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may participate in 
the reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the 
Secretary determines that such reconstruction is not re-
270 
quired as a result of improper operation and maintenance 
of the project by the non-Federal interest. 
(b) COST SHARING.—The non-Federal share of the 
costs for the reconstruction of a flood control project au-
thorized by this section shall be the same non-Federal 
share that was applicable to construction of the project. 
The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for operation 
and maintenance and repair of a project for which recon-
struction is undertaken under this section. 
(c) RECONSTRUCTION DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘reconstruction’’, as used with respect to a 
project, means addressing major project deficiencies 
caused by long-term degradation of the foundation, con-
struction materials, or engineering systems or components 
of the project, the results of which render the project at 
risk of not performing in compliance with its authorized 
project purposes. In addressing such deficiencies, the Sec-
retary may incorporate current design standards and effi-
ciency improvements, including the replacement of obso-
lete mechanical and electrical components at pumping sta-
tions, if such incorporation does not significantly change 
the scope, function, and purpose of the project as author-
ized.
271 
(d) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—The following flood con-
trol projects are eligible for reconstruction under this sec-
tion: 
(1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, 
Illinois. 
(2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage 
District, Illinois. 
(3) Wood River Drainage and Levee District, 
Illinois. 
(4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illi-
nois. 
(5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois. 
(6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alex-
ander County, Illinois. 
(7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, 
Illinois. 
(8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, 
Shawneetown, 
Old 
Shawneetown, 
Golconda, 
Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and Reevesville, Illinois. 
(e) JUSTIFICATION.—The reconstruction of a project 
authorized by this section shall not be considered a sepa-
rable element of the project. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated—