In the Senate of the United States,
May 25 (legislative day, May 15), 1995.
Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Rep-
resentatives (H. Con. Res. 67) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolu-
tion setting forth the congressional budget for the United
States Government for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998,
1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002’’, do pass with the following
AMENDMENT:
Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert:
SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.
(a) DECLARATION.—The Congress determines and de-
clares that this resolution is the concurrent resolution on
the budget for fiscal year 1996, including the appropriate
budgetary levels for fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, and 2002, as required by section 301 of the Congres-
sional Budget Act of 1974.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for
this concurrent resolution is as follows:
Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996.
TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS
Sec. 101. Recommended levels and amounts.
Sec. 102. Debt increase.
Sec. 103. Social Security.
Sec. 104. Major functional categories.
Sec. 105. Reconciliation.
HCON 67 EAS
TITLE II—BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING
Sec. 201. Discretionary spending limits.
Sec. 202. Extension of pay-as-you-go point of order.
Sec. 203. Tax reserve fund in the Senate.
Sec. 204. Budget surplus allowance.
Sec. 205. Scoring of emergency legislation.
Sec. 206. Sale of Government assets.
Sec. 207. Credit reform and guaranteed student loans.
Sec. 208. Extension of Budget Act 60-vote enforcement through 2002.
Sec. 209. Repeal of IRS allowance.
Sec. 210. Exercise of rulemaking powers.
TITLE III—SENSE OF THE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE
Sec. 301. Restructuring Government and program terminations.
Sec. 302. Sense of the Senate regarding returning programs to the States.
Sec. 303. Commercialization of Federal activities.
Sec. 304. Nonpartisan Advisory Commission on the CPI.
Sec. 305. Sense of the Congress on a uniform accounting system in the Federal
Government and nonpartisan commission on accounting and
budgeting.
Sec. 306. Sense of the Congress that 90 percent of the benefits of any tax cuts
must go to the middle class.
Sec. 307. Bipartisan Commission on the Solvency of Medicare.
Sec. 308. Sense of the Senate on the distribution of agriculture savings.
Sec. 309. Sense of the Congress regarding protection of children’s health.
Sec. 310. Sense of the Senate that lobbying expenses should remain nondeductible.
Sec. 311. Expatriate taxes.
Sec. 312. Sense of the Senate regarding losses of trust funds due to fraud and
abuse in the medicare program.
Sec. 313. Sense of the Congress regarding full funding for Decade of the Brain
research.
Sec. 314. Consideration of the Independent Budget for Veterans Affairs, Fiscal
Year 1996.
Sec. 315. Sense of the Senate regarding the costs of the National Voter Registra-
tion Act of 1993.
Sec. 316. Sense of the Senate regarding Presidential Election Campaign Fund.
Sec. 317. Sense of Congress regarding funds to defend against sexual harassment.
Sec. 318. Sense of the Senate regarding financial responsibility to schools affected
by Federal activities.
Sec. 319. Sense of the Senate to eliminate the earnings penalty.
Sec. 320. Student loan cuts.
Sec. 321. Sense of the Senate regarding the nutritional health of children.
Sec. 322. Sense of the Senate on maintaining Federal funding for law enforce-
ment.
Sec. 323. Need to enact long term health care reform.
Sec. 324. Sense of the Senate regarding mandatory major assumptions under
function 270: Energy.
Sec. 325. Defense overhead.
Sec. 326. Sense of the Senate regarding the essential air service program of the
Department of Transportation.
Sec. 327. Sense of the Senate regarding the priority that should be given to re-
newable energy and energy efficiency research, development, and
demonstration activities.
Sec. 328. Foreign Sales Corporations income exclusion.
HCON 67 EAS
TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS
SEC. 101. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.
The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the
fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
(1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—(A) For purposes of the en-
forcement of this resolution—
(i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues
are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $1,043,275,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $1,083,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,135,450,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,189,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,248,950,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,315,750,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,386,675,000,000.
(ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of
Federal revenues should be changed are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $275,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $450,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $2,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $2,750,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,550,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,675,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(iii) The amounts for Federal Insurance Con-
tributions Act revenues for hospital insurance within
the recommended levels of Federal revenues are as fol-
lows:
Fiscal year 1996: $103,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $109,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $114,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $120,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $126,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $133,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $140,400,000,000.
(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund)—
(i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues
are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $938,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $973,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,019,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,067,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,120,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,180,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,244,600,000,000.
(ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of
Federal revenues should be changed are as follows:
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 1996: ¥$595,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: ¥$701,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: ¥$793,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $902,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,201,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $11,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: ¥$6,000,000.
(2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—(A) For purposes of
the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of
total new budget authority are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $1,269,375,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $1,296,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,344,650,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,387,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,446,350,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,473,550,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,519,775,000,000.
(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total
new budget authority are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $1,171,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $1,194,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,237,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,272,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2000: $1,324,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,342,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,377,900,000,000.
(3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—(A) For purposes of the en-
forcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total
budget outlays are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $1,275,675,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $1,293,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,321,250,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,368,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,423,850,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,452,550,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,500,175,000,000.
(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total
budget outlays are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $1,179,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $1,193,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,214,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,255,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,302,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,322,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(4) DEFICITS.—(A) For purposes of the enforcement
of this resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $232,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $209,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $185,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $178,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $174,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $136,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $113,500,000,000.
(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund), the amounts of the deficits
are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $240,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $219,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $195,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $187,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $182,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $141,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $114,900,000,000.
(5) PUBLIC DEBT.—The appropriate levels of the pub-
lic debt are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $5,201,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $5,481,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $5,734,900,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 1999: $5,980,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $6,219,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $6,421,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $6,599,500,000,000.
(6) DIRECT LOAN OBLIGATIONS.—The appropriate
levels of total new direct loan obligations are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $37,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $40,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $42,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $45,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $45,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $45,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $46,100,000,000.
(7) PRIMARY LOAN GUARANTEE COMMITMENTS.—The
appropriate levels of new primary loan guarantee commit-
ments are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $193,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $187,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $185,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $183,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $184,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $186,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $187,600,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
SEC. 102. DEBT INCREASE.
The amounts of the increase in the public debt subject
to limitation are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $298,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $279,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $253,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $245,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $239,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $202,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $177,700,000,000.
SEC. 103. SOCIAL SECURITY.
(a) SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUES.—For purposes of
Senate enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the Con-
gressional Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of revenues of
the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund
and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as
follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $374,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $392,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $411,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $430,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $452,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $475,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $498,600,000,000.
(b) SOCIAL SECURITY OUTLAYS.—For purposes of
Senate enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the Con-
HCON 67 EAS
gressional Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of outlays of
the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund
and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as
follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $299,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $310,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $324,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $338,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $353,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $368,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $383,800,000,000.
SEC. 104. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.
The Congress determines and declares that the appro-
priate levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new
direct loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee
commitments for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 for each
major functional category are:
(1) National Defense (050):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$257,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $261,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$253,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $257,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$259,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $254,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$266,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $259,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$276,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $267,800,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$275,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $267,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$275,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $269,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,700,000,000.
(2) International Affairs (150):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$5,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $18,300,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$5,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $18,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$5,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $18,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $14,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$5,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $18,300,000,000.
(3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $16,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
HCON 67 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(4) Energy (270):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $2,900,000,000
(B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $2,600,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $4,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $2,800,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $19,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $18,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $16,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $16,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $15,800,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $15,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(6) Agriculture (350):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $13,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$11,500,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$11,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $11,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$10,900,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$11,600,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$11,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$11,100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $10,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$10,900,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $5,700,000,000.
(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $1,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$5,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$2,500,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, ¥$3,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$3,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $123,100,000,000.
(8) Transportation (400):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $36,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $38,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $32,800,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $39,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,800,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $40,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $41,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $41,000,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $40,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(9) Community and Regional Development (450):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $5,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $5,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,300,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $5,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $5,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,200,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $5,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,200,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $4,600,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $4,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$2,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $1,200,000,000.
(10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social
Services (500):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $48,975,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $52,575,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$13,600,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $16,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $48,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $49,000,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$16,300,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $15,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $48,450,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,250,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$19,100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $15,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $48,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,200,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$21,800,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $14,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $49,350,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,850,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$21,900,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $15,000,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $48,850,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,350,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$22,000,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $15,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $49,075,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,575,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$22,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $16,600,000,000.
(11) Health (550):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$121,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $121,030,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$127,600,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $127,420,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$133,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $133,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$138,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $137,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$142,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $141,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$146,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $146,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$150,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $150,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $300,000,000.
(12) Medicare (570):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$171,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $169,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$180,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $178,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$193,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $191,400,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$207,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $204,800,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$221,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $219,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$238,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $236,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$258,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $256,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(13) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act, Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust
Fund:
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $61,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $60,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $66,500,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $65,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $73,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $73,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $81,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $81,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $90,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $89,400,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$100,400,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $99,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$112,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $111,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(14) Income Security (600):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$226,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $225,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$233,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $235,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$253,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $246,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$256,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $257,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$272,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $272,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
HCON 67 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$277,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $277,400,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$291,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $100,000,000.
(15) Social Security (650):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $9,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(16) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $37,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $26,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $37,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $37,700,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,100,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $21,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,000,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $19,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,200,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,000,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $18,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,200,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $19,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $38,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $40,100,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,400,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $19,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $38,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.
(C) 
New 
direct 
loan 
obligations,
$1,700,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $20,600,000,000.
(17) Administration of Justice (750):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $20,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $20,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $21,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,400,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $21,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $21,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(18) General Government (800):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) New budget authority, $12,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(19) Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$297,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $297,900,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$308,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $308,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$316,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $316,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$327,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $327,800,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
HCON 67 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$338,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $338,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$345,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $345,500,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$353,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $353,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(20) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act, Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$308,800,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, $308,800,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$319,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $319,800,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$326,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $326,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$337,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $337,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$346,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $346,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$351,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $351,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$356,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $356,400,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(21) The corresponding levels of gross interest on the
public debt are as follows:
Fiscal year 1996: $369,598,000,000.
Fiscal year 1997: $380,164,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 1998: $388,144,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $400,182,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $411,444,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $421,668,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $430,760,000,000.
(22) Allowances (920):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$7,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$6,070,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$7,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$7,580,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$6,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$6,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$5,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$6,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$4,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$4,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
HCON 67 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$4,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(23) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$33,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$33,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$33,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$33,800,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$36,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$36,300,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$37,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$37,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$39,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$39,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$41,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$41,100,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
HCON 67 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$42,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$42,300,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
(24) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security
Act, Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
Fiscal year 1996:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$30,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$30,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$31,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$31,200,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$33,600,000,000.
HCON 67 EAS
(B) Outlays, ¥$33,600,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$34,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$34,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$36,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$36,700,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$37,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$37,900,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
HCON 67 EAS
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$39,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$39,000,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commit-
ments, $0.
SEC. 105. RECONCILIATION.
(a) SENATE COMMITTEES.—Not later than July 14,
1995, the committees named in this subsection shall submit
their recommendations to the Committee on the Budget of
the Senate. After receiving those recommendations, the Com-
mittee on the Budget shall report to the Senate a reconcili-
ation bill carrying out all such recommendations without
any substantive revision.
(1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION,
AND
FORESTRY.—The Senate Committee on Agri-
culture, Nutrition, and Forestry shall report changes
in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Bal-
anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of
1985) to reduce outlays $2,490,000,000 in fiscal year
1996, $27,973,000,000 for the period of fiscal years
1996 through 2000, and $45,804,000,000 for the pe-
riod of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
HCON 67 EAS
(2) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—The Sen-
ate Committee on Armed Services shall report changes
in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending to reduce outlays $21,000,000 in fiscal year
1996, $338,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2000, and $649,000,000 for the period of fis-
cal years 1996 through 2002.
(3) COMMITTEE
ON
BANKING, HOUSING, AND
URBAN AFFAIRS.—The Senate Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs shall report changes in
laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the deficit
$373,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $5,742,000,000 for
the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and
$6,690,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2002.
(4) COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND
TRANSPORTATION.—The Senate Committee on Com-
merce, Science, and Transportation shall report
changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the
deficit 
$2,464,000,000 
in 
fiscal 
year 
1996,
$21,937,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2000, and $33,685,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(5) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RE-
SOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Energy and
HCON 67 EAS
Natural Resources shall report changes in laws within
its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce
outlays 
$1,771,000,000 
in 
fiscal 
year 
1996,
$4,775,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2000, and $5,001,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(6) COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC
WORKS.—The Senate Committee on Environment and
Public Works shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce
outlays 
$106,000,000 
in 
fiscal 
year 
1996,
$1,290,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2000, and $2,236,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(7) COMMITTEE ON FINANCE.—The Senate Com-
mittee on Finance shall report changes in laws within
its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce
outlays 
$21,657,000,000 
in 
fiscal 
year 
1996,
$278,760,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2000, and $519,002,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(8) COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS.—The
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations shall report
changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending to reduce outlays $0 in fiscal year
HCON 67 EAS
1996, $0 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through
2000, and $0 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2002.
(9) COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS.—
The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide 
direct 
spending 
to 
reduce 
outlays
$118,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $3,023,000,000 for
the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and
$6,871,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2002.
(10) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.—The Sen-
ate Committee on the Judiciary shall report changes
in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending to reduce outlays $119,000,000 in fiscal
year 1996, $923,000,000 for the period of fiscal years
1996 through 2000, and $1,483,000,000 for the period
of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(11) COMMITTEE
ON
LABOR
AND
HUMAN
RE-
SOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Labor and
Human Resources shall report changes in laws within
its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce
outlays 
$266,000,000 
in 
fiscal 
year 
1996,
$2,990,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
HCON 67 EAS
through 2000, and $4,395,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
(12) COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRA-
TION.—The Senate Committee on Rules and Adminis-
tration shall report changes in laws within its juris-
diction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays
$2,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $37,000,000 for the
period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and
$72,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996
through 2002.
(13) COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS.—The
Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall report
changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending to reduce outlays $301,000,000 in fis-
cal year 1996, $5,760,000,000 for the period of fiscal
years 1996 through 2000, and $10,002,000,000 for the
period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
TITLE II—BUDGETARY
RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING
SEC. 201. DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.
(a) DEFINITION.—As used in this section and for the
purposes of allocations made pursuant to section 602(a) of
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, for the discretionary
category, the term ‘‘discretionary spending limit’’ means—
(1) with respect to fiscal year 1996—
HCON 67 EAS
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$258,379,000,000 in new budget authority and
$262,035,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$219,441,000,000 in new budget authority and
$264,908,000,000 in outlays;
(2) with respect to fiscal year 1997—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$254,028,000,000 in new budget authority and
$257,695,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$212,164,000,000 in new budget authority and
$249,248,000,000 in outlays;
(3) with respect to fiscal year 1998—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$260,321,000,000 in new budget authority and
$255,226,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$219,177,000,000 in new budget authority and
$244,735,000,000 in outlays;
(4) with respect to fiscal year 1999—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$266,906,000,000 in new budget authority and
$260,331,000,000 in outlays; and
HCON 67 EAS
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$210,509,000,000 in new budget authority and
$242,212,000,000 in outlays;
(5) with respect to fiscal year 2000—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and
$268,468,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$215,463,000,000 in new budget authority and
$243,078,000,000 in outlays;
(6) with respect to fiscal year 2001—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and
$268,468,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$219,384,000,000 in new budget authority and
$248,786,000,000 in outlays; and
(7) with respect to fiscal year 2002—
(A) 
for 
the 
defense 
category
$276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and
$270,000,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) 
for 
the 
nondefense 
category
$218,784,000,000 in new budget authority and
$248,160,000,000 in outlays;
HCON 67 EAS
as adjusted for changes in concepts and definitions and
emergency appropriations.
(b) POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), it shall not be in order in the Senate to
consider—
(A) any concurrent resolution on the budget
for fiscal year 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, or 2002 (or amendment, motion, or con-
ference report on such a resolution) that provides
discretionary spending in excess of the sum of
the defense and nondefense discretionary spend-
ing limits for such fiscal year; or
(B) any appropriations bill or resolution
(or amendment, motion, or conference report on
such appropriations bill or resolution) for fiscal
year 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
or 2002 that would exceed any of the discre-
tionary spending limits in this section or
suballocations of those limits made pursuant to
section 602(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974.
(2) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply if
a declaration of war by the Congress is in effect or
if a joint resolution pursuant to section 258 of the
HCON 67 EAS
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
of 1985 has been enacted.
(c) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or sus-
pended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-
fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.
(d) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the deci-
sions of the Chair relating to any provision of this section
shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between,
and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the
concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the case
may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members
of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in
the Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair
on a point of order raised under this section.
(e) DETERMINATION OF BUDGET LEVELS.—For pur-
poses of this section, the levels of new budget authority, out-
lays, new entitlement authority, and revenues for a fiscal
year shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by
the Committee on the Budget of the Senate.
SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO POINT OF ORDER.
(a) PURPOSE.—The Senate declares that it is essential
to—
(1) ensure continued compliance with the bal-
anced budget plan set forth in this resolution; and
HCON 67 EAS
(2) continue the pay-as-you-go enforcement sys-
tem.
(b) POINT OF ORDER.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order in the
Senate to consider any direct-spending or receipts leg-
islation (as defined in paragraph (3)) that would in-
crease the deficit for any one of the three applicable
time periods (as defined in paragraph (2)) as meas-
ured pursuant to paragraph (4).
(2) APPLICABLE TIME PERIODS.—For purposes
of this subsection, the term ‘‘applicable time period’’
means any one of the three following periods—
(A) the first fiscal year covered by the most
recently adopted concurrent resolution on the
budget;
(B) the period of the first 5 fiscal years cov-
ered by the most recently adopted concurrent res-
olution on the budget; or
(C) the period of the 5 fiscal years following
the first 5 years covered by the most recently
adopted concurrent resolution on the budget.
(3) DIRECT-SPENDING
OR
RECEIPTS
LEGISLA-
TION.—For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘di-
rect-spending or receipts legislation’’ shall—
HCON 67 EAS
(A) except as otherwise provided in this
subsection, include all direct-spending legislation
as that term is interpreted for purposes of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985;
(B) include—
(i) any bill, joint resolution, amend-
ment, motion, or conference report to which
this subsection otherwise applies; and
(ii) the estimated amount of savings in
direct-spending programs applicable to that
fiscal year resulting from the prior year’s
sequestration under the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985,
if any (except for any amounts sequestered
as a result of a net deficit increase in the
fiscal year immediately preceding the prior
fiscal year); and
(C) exclude—
(i) any concurrent resolution on the
budget; and
(ii) full funding of, and continuation
of, the deposit insurance guarantee commit-
ment in effect on the date of enactment of
the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990.