the court may stay the rule or grant such other relief as
it deems appropriate.
‘‘(6) In making any determination or granting any
relief authorized by this subsection, the court shall take
due account of the rule of prejudicial error.
‘‘(b) In an action for the judicial review of a rule,
any regulatory flexibility analysis for such rule (including
an analysis prepared or corrected pursuant to subsection
(a)(4)) shall constitute part of the whole record of agency
action in connection with such review.
‘‘(c) Nothing in this section bars judicial review of
any other impact statement or similar analysis required
by any other law if judicial review of such statement or
analysis is otherwise provided by law.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply only to final agency rules issued
after the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3. RULES COMMENTED ON BY SBA CHIEF COUNSEL
FOR ADVOCACY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 612 of title 5, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing new subsection:
‘‘(d) ACTION BY THE SBA CHIEF COUNSEL FOR AD-
VOCACY.—
‘‘(1) TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED RULES AND
INITIAL
REGULATORY
FLEXIBILITY
ANALYSIS
TO
SBA CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ADVOCACY.—On or before
the 30th day preceding the date of publication by an
agency of general notice of proposed rulemaking for
a rule, the agency shall transmit to the Chief Coun-
sel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administra-
tion—
‘‘(A) a copy of the proposed rule; and
‘‘(B)(i) a copy of the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for the rule if required under
section 603; or
‘‘(ii) a determination by the agency that an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not re-
quired for the proposed rule under section 603
and an explanation for the determination.
‘‘(2) STATEMENT OF EFFECT.—On or before
the 15th day following receipt of a proposed rule and
initial regulatory flexibility analysis from an agency
under paragraph (1), the Chief Counsel for Advo-
cacy may transmit to the agency a written statement
of the effect of the proposed rule on small entities.
‘‘(3) RESPONSE.—If the Chief Counsel for Ad-
vocacy transmits to an agency a statement of effect
on a proposed rule in accordance with paragraph
(2), the agency shall publish the statement, together
with the response of the agency to the statement, in
the Federal Register at the time of publication of
general notice of proposed rulemaking for the rule.
‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE.—Any proposed rules is-
sued by an appropriate Federal banking agency (as
that term is defined in section 3(q) of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(q)), the Na-
tional Credit Union Administration, or the Office of
Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, in connection
with the implementation of monetary policy or to en-
sure the safety and soundness of federally insured
depository institutions, any affiliate of such an insti-
tution, credit unions, or government sponsored hous-
ing enterprises or to protect the Federal deposit in-
surance funds shall not be subject to the require-
ments of this subsection.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 603(a) of
title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘in
accordance with section 612(d)’’ before the period at the
end of the last sentence.
SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING SBA CHIEF
COUNSEL FOR ADVOCACY.
It is the sense of Congress that the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration should
be permitted to appear as amicus curiae in any action or
case brought in a court of the United States for the pur-
pose of reviewing a rule.
Æ