146 
HR 5303 RDS
the easterly edge of said Texas City Turning Basin, 
the following eighteen (18) courses and distances: 
(A) North 01° 34′ 19″ East, a distance of 
57.40 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(B) North 05° 02′ 13″ West, a distance of 
161.85 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(C) North 06° 01′ 56″ East, a distance of 
297.75 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(D) North 06° 18′ 07″ West, a distance of 
71.33 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(E) North 07° 21′ 09″ West, a distance of 
122.45 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(F) North 26° 41′ 15″ West, a distance of 
46.02 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(G) North 01° 31′ 59″ West, a distance of 
219.78 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
147 
HR 5303 RDS
(H) North 15° 54′ 07″ West, a distance of 
104.89 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(I) North 04° 00′ 34″ East, a distance of 
72.94 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(J) North 06° 46′ 38″ West, a distance of 
78.89 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(K) North 12° 07′ 59″ West, a distance of 
182.79 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(L) North 20° 50′ 47″ West, a distance of 
105.74 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(M) North 02° 02′ 04″ West, a distance of 
184.50 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(N) North 08° 07′ 11″ East, a distance of 
102.23 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(O) North 08° 16′ 00″ West, a distance of 
213.45 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
148 
HR 5303 RDS
(P) North 03° 15′ 16″ West, a distance of 
336.45 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the left. 
(Q) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the left having a radius of 896.08 feet, 
a central angle of 14° 00′ 05″, a chord of North 
09° 36′ 03″ West – 218.43 feet, and an arc 
length of 218.97 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the right. 
(R) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 483.33 
feet, a central angle of 19° 13′ 34″, a chord of 
North 13° 52′ 03″ East – 161.43 feet, and an 
arc length of 162.18 feet to a point for the 
northwesterly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
(5) Thence, continuing over and across said 
City of Texas City Survey, and along the edge of fill 
along said Galveston Bay, the following fifteen (15) 
courses and distances: 
(A) North 30° 45′ 02″ East, a distance of 
189.03 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
149 
HR 5303 RDS
(B) North 34° 20′ 49″ East, a distance of 
174.16 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the right. 
(C) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 202.01 
feet, a central angle of 25° 53′ 37″, a chord of 
North 33° 14′ 58″ East – 90.52 feet, and an 
arc length of 91.29 feet to a point for the be-
ginning of a non-tangent curve to the left. 
(D) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the left having a radius of 463.30 feet, 
a central angle of 23° 23′ 57″, a chord of North 
48° 02′ 53″ East – 187.90 feet, and an arc 
length of 189.21 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the right. 
(E) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 768.99 
feet, a central angle of 16° 24′ 19″, a chord of 
North 43° 01′ 40″ East – 219.43 feet, and an 
arc length of 220.18 feet to an angle point of 
the tract herein described. 
(F) North 38° 56′ 50″ East, a distance of 
126.41 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
150 
HR 5303 RDS
(G) North 42° 59′ 50″ East, a distance of 
128.28 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the right. 
(H) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 151.96 
feet, a central angle of 68° 36′ 31″, a chord of 
North 57° 59′ 42″ East – 171.29 feet, and an 
arc length of 181.96 feet to a point for the 
most northerly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
(I) South 77° 14′ 49″ East, a distance of 
131.60 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(J) South 84° 44′ 18″ East, a distance of 
86.58 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(K) South 58° 14′ 45″ East, a distance of 
69.62 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(L) South 49° 44′ 51″ East, a distance of 
149.00 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(M) South 44° 47′ 21″ East, a distance of 
353.77 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the left. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
151 
HR 5303 RDS
(N) Easterly along said non-tangent curve 
to the left having a radius of 253.99 feet, a 
central angle of 98° 53′ 23″, a chord of South 
83° 28′ 51″ East – 385.96 feet, and an arc 
length of 438.38 feet to an angle point of the 
tract herein described. 
(O) South 75° 49′ 13″ East, a distance of 
321.52 feet to the point of beginning and con-
taining 393.53 acres (17,142,111 square feet) 
of land. 
SEC. 313. STONINGTON HARBOR, CONNECTICUT. 
The portion of the project for navigation, Stonington 
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act of May 23, 
1828 (4 Stat. 288; chapter 73) that consists of the inner 
stone 
breakwater 
that 
begins 
at 
coordinates 
N. 
682,146.42, E. 1231,378.69, running north 83.587 de-
grees west 166.79’ to a point N. 682,165.05, E. 
1,231,212.94, running north 69.209 degrees west 380.89’ 
to a point N. 682,300.25, E. 1,230,856.86, is no longer 
authorized as a Federal project beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
152 
HR 5303 RDS
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The following projects for water resources develop-
ment and conservation and other purposes, as identified 
in the reports titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water 
Resources Development’’ submitted to Congress on Janu-
ary 29, 2015, and January 29, 2016, respectively, pursu-
ant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise 
reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by 
the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, 
and subject to the conditions, described in the respective 
reports designated in this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. TX 
Brazos Island 
Harbor 
Nov. 3, 2014 
Federal: $116,116,000 
Non-Federal: $88,471,000 
Total: $204,587,000 
2. LA 
Calcasieu Lock 
Dec. 2, 2014 
Total: $16,700,000 (to be de-
rived 1⁄2 from the general 
fund of the Treasury and 
1⁄2 from the Inland Water-
ways Trust Fund) 
3. NH, 
ME 
Portsmouth Har-
bor and 
Piscataqua 
River 
Feb. 8, 2015 
Federal: $15,580,000 
Non-Federal: $5,190,000 
Total: $20,770,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
153 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
4. FL 
Port Everglades 
Jun. 25, 
2015 
Federal: $220,200,000 
Non-Federal: $102,500,000 
Total: $322,700,000 
5. AK 
Little Diomede 
Harbor 
Aug. 10, 
2015 
Federal: $26,015,000 
Non-Federal: $2,945,000 
Total: $28,960,000 
6. SC 
Charleston Har-
bor 
Sep. 8, 2015 
Federal: $224,300,000 
Non-Federal: $269,000,000 
Total: $493,300,000 
7. AK 
Craig Harbor 
Mar. 16, 
2016 
Federal: $29,062,000 
Non-Federal: $3,255,000 
Total: $32,317,000 
8. PA 
Upper Ohio 
Sep. 12, 
2016 
Federal: $1,324,235,500 
Non-Federal: $1,324,235,500 
Total: $2,648,471,000 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. TX 
Leon Creek Wa-
tershed 
Jun. 30, 
2014 
Federal: $18,314,000 
Non-Federal: $9,861,000 
Total: $28,175,000 
2. MO, 
KS 
Armourdale and 
Central Indus-
trial District 
Levee Units, 
Missouri River 
and Tributaries 
at Kansas Citys 
Jan. 27, 
2015 
Federal: $207,036,000 
Non-Federal: $111,481,000 
Total: $318,517,000 
3. KS 
City of Manhattan 
Apr. 30, 
2015 
Federal: $15,440,100 
Non-Federal: $8,313,900 
Total: $23,754,000 
4. TN 
Mill Creek 
Oct. 16, 
2015 
Federal: $17,759,000 
Non-Federal: $10,745,000 
Total: $28,504,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
154 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
5. KS 
Upper Turkey 
Creek Basin 
Dec. 22, 
2015 
Federal: $24,584,000 
Non-Federal: $13,238,000 
Total: $37,822,000 
6. NC 
Princeville 
Feb. 23, 
2016 
Federal: $14,001,000 
Non-Federal: $7,539,000 
Total: $21,540,000 
7. CA 
American River 
Common Fea-
tures 
Apr. 26, 
2016 
Federal: $876,478,000 
Non-Federal: $689,272,000 
Total: $1,565,750,000 
8. CA 
West Sacramento 
Apr. 26, 
2016 
Federal: $776,517,000 
Non-Federal: $414,011,000 
Total: $1,190,528,000. 
(3) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated Initial 
Costs and 
Estimated 
Renourishment 
Costs 
1. SC 
Colleton County 
Sep. 5, 2014 
Initial Federal: $13,733,850 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$7,395,150 
Initial Total: $21,129,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$16,371,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$16,371,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$32,742,000 
2. FL 
Flagler County 
Dec. 23, 
2014 
Initial Federal: $9,218,300 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$4,963,700 
Initial Total: $14,182,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$15,390,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$15,390,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$30,780,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
155 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated Initial 
Costs and 
Estimated 
Renourishment 
Costs 
3. NC 
Carteret County 
Dec. 23, 
2014 
Initial Federal: $24,263,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$13,064,000 
Initial Total: $37,327,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$114,728,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$114,728,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$229,456,000 
4. NJ 
Hereford Inlet to 
Cape May Inlet, 
Cape May 
County 
Jan. 23, 
2015 
Initial Federal: $14,040,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$7,560,000 
Initial Total: $21,600,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$41,215,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$41,215,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$82,430,000 
5. LA 
West Shore Lake 
Pontchartrain 
Jun. 12, 
2015 
Federal: $466,760,000 
Non-Federal: $251,330,000 
Total: $718,090,000 
6. CA 
San Diego County 
Apr. 26, 
2016 
Initial Federal: $20,166,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$10,858,000 
Initial Total: $31,024,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$68,215,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$68,215,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$136,430,000. 
(4) ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
156 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. FL 
Central Ever-
glades 
Dec. 23, 
2014 
Federal: $976,375,000 
Non-Federal: $974,625,000 
Total: $1,951,000,000 
2. WA 
Skokomish River 
Dec. 14, 
2015 
Federal: $12,782,000 
Non-Federal: $6,882,000 
Total: $19,664,000 
3. WA 
Puget Sound 
Sep. 16, 
2016 
Federal: $293,558,000 
Non-Federal: $158,069,000 
Total: $451,627,000 
(5) FLOOD
RISK
MANAGEMENT
AND
ECO-
SYSTEM RESTORATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. IL, 
WI 
Upper Des 
Plaines River 
and Tributaries 
Jun. 8, 2015 
Federal: $199,393,000 
Non-Federal: $107,694,000 
Total: $307,087,000. 
(6) FLOOD
RISK
MANAGEMENT, ECOSYSTEM 
RESTORATION, AND RECREATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CA 
South San Fran-
cisco Bay 
Shoreline 
Dec. 18, 
2015 
Federal: $69,521,000 
Non-Federal: $104,379,000 
Total: $173,900,000. 
(7) ECOSYSTEM
RESTORATION
AND
RECRE-
ATION.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
157 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. OR 
Willamette River 
Dec. 14, 
2015 
Federal: $19,143,000 
Non-Federal: $10,631,000 
Total: $29,774,000 
2. CA 
Los Angeles River 
Dec. 18, 
2015 
Federal: $375,773,000 
Non-Federal: $980,835,000 
Total: $1,356,608,000. 
(8) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. LA 
Southwest Coastal 
Louisiana 
Jul. 29, 
2016 
Federal: $2,011,280,000 
Non-Federal: $1,082,997,000 
Total: $3,094,277,000 
(9) DEAUTHORIZATIONS, MODIFICATIONS, AND 
OTHER PROJECTS.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. TX 
Upper Trinity 
River 
May 21, 
2008 
Federal: $526,500,000 
Non-Federal: $283,500,000 
Total: $810,000,000 
2. KY 
Green River Locks 
and Dams 3, 4, 
5, 6 and Barren 
River Lock and 
Dam 1 Disposi-
tion 
Apr. 30, 
2015 
Federal: $0 
Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $0 
3. KS, 
MO 
Turkey Creek 
Basin 
May 13, 
2016 
Federal: $97,067,750 
Non-Federal: $55,465,250 
Total: $152,533,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
158 
HR 5303 RDS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
4. KY 
Ohio River Shore-
line 
May 13, 
2016 
Federal: $20,309,900 
Non-Federal: $10,936,100 
Total: $31,246,000 
5. MO 
Blue River Basin 
May 13, 
2016 
Federal: $34,860,000 
Non-Federal: $11,620,000 
Total: $46,480,000 
6. FL 
Picayune Strand 
Jul. 15, 
2016 
Federal: $308,983,500 
Non-Federal: $308,983,500 
Total: $617,967,000 
7. MO 
Swope Park In-
dustrial Area, 
Blue River 
Jul. 15, 
2016 
Federal: $20,205,250 
Non-Federal: $10,879,750 
Total: $31,085,000 
Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 
2016. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:21 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.RDS
H5303
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS