available for the purposes identified in sec-
tion 3015(d) of the Federal Transit Act of
1998.’; and
‘‘(D) by adding at the end the following:
‘(3) SPECIAL
RULE.—Nothing in this sub-
section shall be construed to limit the transportation
research conducted by the centers funded by this
section.’;
‘‘(8) in subsection (g)(2) by striking ‘(c)(2)(B),’
and all that follows through ‘(f)(2)(B),’ and insert-
ing ‘(c)(1), (c)(2)(B), (d)(1), (d)(2)(B), (e)(1),
(e)(2)(B), (f)(1), (f)(2)(B),’;
‘‘(9) in subsection (h) by inserting ‘under the
Transportation Discretionary Spending Guarantee
for the Mass Transit Category’ after ‘through (f)’;
and
‘‘(10) in subsection (h)(5) by striking subpara-
graphs (A) through (E) and inserting the following:
‘(A) for fiscal year 1999 $400,000,000;
‘(B) for fiscal year 2000 $410,000,000;
‘(C) for fiscal year 2001 $420,000,000;
‘(D) for fiscal year 2002 $430,000,000;
and
‘(E) for fiscal year 2003 $430,000,000;’.’’.
(r) PROJECTS FOR FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEMS.—
Section 3030 of the Federal Transit Act of 1998 is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) 
in 
paragraph 
(8) 
by 
inserting
‘‘North-’’ before ‘‘South’’;
(B) in paragraph (42) by striking ‘‘Mary-
land’’ and inserting ‘‘Baltimore’’;
(C) in paragraph (103) by striking
‘‘busway’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘Boulevard
transitway’’;
(D) in paragraph (106) by inserting
‘‘CTA’’ before ‘‘Douglas’’;
(E) by striking paragraph (108) and in-
serting the following:
‘‘(108) Greater Albuquerque Mass Transit
Project.’’; and
(F) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(109) Hartford City Light Rail Connection to
Central Business District.
‘‘(110) Providence–Boston Commuter Rail.
‘‘(111) New York–St. George’s Ferry Inter-
modal Terminal.
‘‘(112) New York–Midtown West Ferry Termi-
nal.
‘‘(113) 
Pinellas 
County–Mobility 
Initiative
Project.
‘‘(114) Atlanta–MARTA Extension (S. De
Kalb-Lindbergh).’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) by striking paragraph (2) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(2) Sioux City–Light Rail.’’;
(B) by striking paragraph (40) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(40) Santa Fe–El Dorado Rail Link.’’;
(C) by striking paragraph (44) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(44) Albuquerque–High Capacity Corridor.’’;
(D) by striking paragraph (53) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(53) San Jacinto–Branch Line (Riverside
County).’’; and
(E) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(69) Chicago–Northwest Rail Transit Cor-
ridor.
‘‘(70) 
Vermont–Burlington-Essex 
Commuter
Rail.’’; and
(3) in subsection (c)—
(A) in paragraph (1)(A)—
(i) in the matter preceding clause (i)
by inserting ‘‘(even if the project is not
listed in subsection (a) or (b))’’ before the
colon;
(ii) by striking clause (ii) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(ii) San Diego Mission Valley and
Mid-Coast Corridor, $325,000,000.’’;
(iii) by striking clause (v) and insert-
ing the following:
‘‘(v) Hartford City Light Rail Connec-
tion 
to 
Central 
Business 
District,
$33,000,000.’’;
(iv) by striking clause (xxiii) and in-
serting the following:
‘‘(xxiii) Kansas City–I-35 Commuter
Rail, $30,000,000.’’;
(v) in clause (xxxii) by striking
‘‘Whitehall Ferry Terminal’’ and inserting
‘‘Staten Island Ferry-Whitehall Intermodal
Terminal’’;
(vi) by striking clause (xxxv) and in-
serting the following:
‘‘(xxxv) New York–Midtown West
Ferry Terminal, $16,300,000.’’;