122
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Appropriated funds
may not be used to pay any United States
assessed or voluntary contribution dur-
ing any fiscal year for United Nations
peacekeeping activities until the Sec-
retary of Defense certifies to the des-
ignated congressional committees that
the United Nations has reimbursed the
Department of Defense directly for all
goods and services that were provided to
the United Nations by the Department of
Defense on a reimbursable basis during
the preceding fiscal year for United Na-
tions peacekeeping activities, including
personnel and assistance provided under
section 7 (except to the extent that the
authority of subsection (b)(2) of such sec-
tion to waive the reimbursement require-
ment was exercised with respect to such
personnel or assistance).
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition con-
tained in paragraph (1) shall not apply
when the Department of Defense has
failed to submit its bills in a timely man-
123
ner for goods and services that were pro-
vided to the United Nations.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition con-
tained in section 10(c) of the United Nations
Participation Act of 1945, as added by sub-
section (a), shall apply only with respect to
fiscal years after fiscal year 1995.
SEC. 508. LIMITATION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE FUNDS FOR UNITED STATES SHARE
OF COSTS OF UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEP-
ING ACTIVITIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 20 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by inserting
after section 405, as added by section 401 of
this Act, the following new section:
‘‘§ 406. Use of Department of Defense funds for Unit-
ed States share of costs of United Nations
peacekeeping activities: limitation
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION
ON USE
OF FUNDS
FOR
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT.—No funds available
to the Department of Defense shall be avail-
able for payment of any United States as-
sessed or voluntary contribution for United
Nations peacekeeping activities.
124
‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PAR-
TICIPATION
IN
PEACEKEEPING
ACTIVITIES.—
Funds available to the Department of Defense
may be used for payment of the incremental
costs associated with the participation of ele-
ments of the armed forces in United Nations
peacekeeping activities only to the extent
that Congress has by law specifically author-
ized the use of those funds for such pur-
poses.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning
of such chapter is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:
‘‘406. Use of Department of Defense funds for United States
share of costs of United Nations peacekeeping ac-
tivities: limitation.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 406 of title
10, United States Code, as added by sub-
section (a), shall take effect on October 1,
1995.
SEC. 509. CODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF
UNITED STATES ASSESSED CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPER-
ATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10 of the United
Nations Participation Act of 1945 is amended
125
by adding after subsection (c), as added by
section 507, the following new subsection:
‘‘(d) LIMITATION
ON ASSESSED CONTRIBU-
TION WITH RESPECT TO A PEACEKEEPING OPER-
ATION.—Funds authorized to be appropriated
for ‘Contributions for International Peace-
keeping Activities’ for any fiscal year shall
not be available for the payment of the United
States assessed contribution for a United Na-
tions peacekeeping operation in an amount
which is greater than 25 percent of the total
amount of all assessed contributions for that
operation, and any arrearages that accumu-
late as a result of assessments in excess of 25
percent of the total amount of all assessed
contributions for any United Nations peace-
keeping operation shall not be recognized or
paid by the United States.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The limitation con-
tained in section 10(d) of the United Nations
Participation Act of 1945, as added by sub-
section (a), shall apply only with respect to
funds authorized to be appropriated for ‘‘Con-
tributions for International Peacekeeping Ac-
tivities’’ for fiscal years after fiscal year 1995.
126
(c) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
404(b) of the Foreign Relations Authorization
Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law
103–236) is amended by striking paragraph
(2).
SEC. 510. BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT.
Section 10 of the United Nations Partici-
pation Act of 1945 is amended by adding after
subsection (d), as added by section 509, the
following new subsections:
‘‘(e) 
BUY
AMERICAN
REQUIREMENT.—No
funds may be obligated or expended to pay
any United States assessed or voluntary con-
tribution for United Nations peacekeeping ac-
tivities unless the Secretary of State deter-
mines and certifies to the designated congres-
sional committees that United States manu-
facturers and suppliers are being given op-
portunities to provide equipment, services,
and material for such activities equal to those
being given to foreign manufacturers and
suppliers.
‘‘(f) DESIGNATED CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT-
TEES DEFINED.—As used in this section, the
127
term ‘designated congressional committees’
means—
‘‘(1) the Committee on International
Relations and the Committee on Appro-
priations of the House of Representa-
tives; and
‘‘(2) the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions and the Committee on Appropria-
tions of the Senate.’’.
SEC. 511. UNITED NATIONS BUDGETARY AND MANAGE-
MENT REFORM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The United Nations Par-
ticipation Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is
further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section:
‘‘SEC. 11. (a) WITHHOLDING OF CONTRIBU-
TIONS.—
‘‘(1) ASSESSED CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REG-
ULAR UNITED NATIONS BUDGET.—At the be-
ginning of each fiscal year, 20 percent of
the amount of funds made available for
that fiscal year for United States assessed
contributions for the regular United Na-
tions budget shall be withheld from obli-
gation and expenditure unless a certifi-
128
cation for that fiscal year has been made
under subsection (b).
‘‘(2) 
ASSESSED
CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR
UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING.—At the be-
ginning of each fiscal year, 50 percent of
the amount of funds made available for
that fiscal year for United States assessed
contributions for United Nations peace-
keeping activities shall be withheld from
obligation and expenditure unless a cer-
tification for that fiscal year has been
made under subsection (b).
‘‘(3) VOLUNTARY
CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR
UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING.—The Unit-
ed States may not during any fiscal year
pay any voluntary contribution to the
United Nations for international peace-
keeping activities unless a certification
for that fiscal year has been made under
subsection (b).
‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION.—The certification re-
ferred to in subsection (a) for any fiscal year
is a certification by the President to the Con-
gress, submitted on or after the beginning of
that fiscal year, of each of the following:
129
‘‘(1) The United Nations has an inde-
pendent office of Inspector General to
conduct and supervise objective audits,
inspections, and investigations relating
to programs and operations of the United
Nations.
‘‘(2) The United Nations has an In-
spector General who was appointed by
the Secretary General with the approval
of the General Assembly and whose ap-
pointment was made principally on the
basis of the appointee’s integrity and
demonstrated ability in accounting, au-
diting, financial analysis, law, manage-
ment analysis, public administration, or
investigation.
‘‘(3) The Inspector General is author-
ized to—
‘‘(A) make investigations and re-
ports relating to the administration
of the programs and operations of the
United Nations;
‘‘(B) have access to all records,
documents, and other available mate-
130
rials relating to those programs and
operations;
‘‘(C) have direct and prompt ac-
cess to any official of the United Na-
tions; and
‘‘(D) have access to all records
and officials of the specialized agen-
cies of the United Nations.
‘‘(4) The United Nations has fully im-
plemented, and made available to all
member states, procedures that effec-
tively protect the identity of, and prevent
reprisals against, any staff member of the
United Nations making a complaint or
disclosing information to, or cooperating
in any investigation or inspection by, the
United Nations Inspector General.
‘‘(5) The United Nations has fully im-
plemented procedures that ensure com-
pliance with recommendations of the
United Nations Inspector General.
‘‘(6) The United Nations has required
the United Nations Inspector General to
issue an annual report and has ensured
that the annual report and all other re-
131
ports of the Inspector General are made
available to the General Assembly with-
out modification.
‘‘(7) The United Nations has provided,
and is committed to providing, sufficient
budgetary resources to ensure the effec-
tive operation of the United Nations In-
spector General.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 11 of the
United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as
added by subsection (a), shall apply only with
respect to fiscal years after fiscal year 1995.
SEC. 512. CONDITIONS ON PROVISION OF INTELLIGENCE
TO THE UNITED NATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The United Nations Par-
ticipation Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is
further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section:
‘‘SEC. 12. (a) PROVISION OF INTELLIGENCE
INFORMATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS.—Before
intelligence information is provided by the
United States to the United Nations, the
President shall ensure that the Director of
Central Intelligence, in consultation with the
Secretary of State and the Secretary of De-
132
fense, has established guidelines governing
the provision of intelligence information to
the United Nations which shall protect intel-
ligence sources and methods from unauthor-
ized disclosure in accordance with section
103(c)(5) of the National Security Act of 1947
(50 U.S.C. 403–3(c)(5)).
‘‘(b) PERIODIC AND SPECIAL REPORTS.—(1)
The President shall periodically report, but
not less frequently than semiannually, to the
Committee on International Relations and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
of the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Foreign Relations and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate on
the types of intelligence provided to the Unit-
ed Nations and the purposes for which it was
provided during the period covered by the re-
port. The President shall also report to the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
of the House of Representatives and the Se-
lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate,
within 15 days after it becomes known to him,
any unauthorized disclosure of intelligence
provided to the United Nations.
133
‘‘(2) The requirement for periodic reports
under the first sentence of paragraph (1) of
this subsection shall not apply to the provi-
sion of intelligence that is provided only to,
and for the use of, United States Government
personnel serving with the United Nations.
‘‘(c) DELEGATION
OF DUTIES.—The Presi-
dent may not delegate or assign the duties of
the President under this section.
‘‘(d) IMPROVED HANDLING OF INTELLIGENCE
INFORMATION
BY
THE UNITED NATIONS.—The
Secretary of State (or the designee of the Sec-
retary), in consultation with the Director of
Central Intelligence and the Secretary of De-
fense, shall work with the United Nations to
improve the handling, processing, dissemina-
tion, and management of all intelligence in-
formation provided to it by its members.
‘‘(e) RELATIONSHIP
TO
EXISTING
LAW.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to—
‘‘(1) impair or otherwise affect the au-
thority of the Director of Central Intel-
ligence to protect intelligence sources
and methods from unauthorized disclo-
sure pursuant to section 103(c)(5) of the
134
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
403–3(c)(5)); or
‘‘(2) supersede or otherwise affect the
provisions of title V of the National Secu-
rity Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 413–415).’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—The amendment
made by subsection (a) shall take effect 45
days after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
TITLE VI—EXPANSION OF THE
NORTH 
ATLANTIC 
TREATY
ORGANIZATION
SEC. 601. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ‘‘NATO Ex-
pansion Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 602. FINDINGS.
The Congress makes the following find-
ings:
(1) Since 1949, the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) has helped
to guarantee the security, freedom, and
prosperity of the United States and its
partners in the alliance.
135
(2) NATO has expanded its member-
ship on three different occasions since its
founding in 1949.
(3) The steadfast and sustained com-
mitment of the member countries of
NATO to mutual defense against the
threat of communist domination played a
significant role in precipitating the col-
lapse of the Iron Curtain and the demise
of the Soviet Union.
(4) Although new threats are more
geographically and functionally diverse
and less predictable, they still imperil
shared interests of the United States and
its NATO allies.
(5) Western interests must be pro-
tected on a cooperative basis without an
undue burden falling upon the United
States.
(6) NATO is the only multilateral or-
ganization that is capable of conducting
effective military operations to protect
Western interests.
(7) The valuable experience gained
from ongoing military cooperation within
136
NATO was critical to the success of joint
military operations in the 1991 liberation
of Kuwait.
(8) NATO is an important diplomatic
forum for discussion of issues of concern
to its member states and for the peaceful
resolution of disputes.
(9) Admission of Central and East Eu-
ropean countries that have recently been
freed from Communist domination to
NATO could contribute to international
peace and enhance the security of those
countries.
(10) By joining the Partnership for
Peace, a number of countries have ex-
pressed interest in NATO membership.
(11) The Partnership for Peace pro-
gram is creating new political and mili-
tary ties with countries in Central and
Eastern Europe and provides the basis
for joint action to deal with common se-
curity problems. Active participation in
the Partnership for Peace will also play
an important role in the evolutionary
process of NATO expansion.
137
(12) In particular, Poland, Hungary,
the Czech Republic, and Slovakia have
made significant progress toward estab-
lishing democratic institutions, free mar-
ket economies, civilian control of their
armed forces, police, and intelligence
services, and the rule of law since the fall
of their previous Communist govern-
ments.
SEC. 603. UNITED STATES POLICY.
It should be the policy of the United
States—
(1) to continue the Nation’s commit-
ment to an active leadership role in
NATO;
(2) to join with the Nation’s NATO al-
lies to redefine the role of the alliance in
the post-Cold War world, taking into ac-
count—
(A) the fundamentally changed se-
curity environment of Central and
Eastern Europe;
(B) the need to assure all coun-
tries of the defensive nature of the al-
liance and the desire of its members
138
to work cooperatively with all former
adversaries;
(C) the emerging security threats
posed by the proliferation of nuclear,
chemical, and biological weapons of
mass destruction and the means to
deliver them;
(D) the continuing challenges to
the interests of all NATO member
countries posed by unstable and un-
democratic regimes harboring hostile
intentions; and
(E) the dependence of the global
economy on a stable energy supply
and the free flow of commerce;
(3) to affirm that NATO military plan-
ning should include joint military oper-
ations beyond the geographic bounds of
the alliance under Article 4 of the North
Atlantic Treaty when the shared interests
of the United States and other member
countries require such action to defend
vital interests;
(4) to expeditiously pursue joint co-
operation agreements for the acquisition
139
of essential systems to significantly in-
crease the crisis management capability
of NATO;
(5) that Poland, Hungary, the Czech
Republic, and Slovakia should be in a po-
sition to further the principles of the
North Atlantic Treaty and to contribute
to the security of the North Atlantic area
in the near future, and, in accordance
with Article 10 of such Treaty, should be
invited to become full NATO members,
provided these countries—
(A) meet appropriate standards,
including—
(i) shared values and inter-
ests;
(ii) democratic governments;
(iii) free market economies;
(iv) civilian control of the
military, of the police, and of the
intelligence and other security
services, so that these organiza-
tions do not pose a threat to
democratic institutions, neighbor-
140
ing countries, or the security of
NATO or the United States;
(v) adherence to the rule of
law and to the values, principles,
and political commitments set
forth in the Helsinki Final Act
and other declarations by the
members of the Organization on
Security and Cooperation in Eu-
rope;
(vi) commitment to further
the principles of NATO and to
contribute to the security of the
North Atlantic area;
(vii) commitment and ability
to accept the obligations, respon-
sibilities, and costs of NATO mem-
bership; and
(viii) commitment and ability
to implement infrastructure de-
velopment activities that will fa-
cilitate participation in and sup-
port for NATO military activities;
and
141
(B) remain committed to protect-
ing the rights of all their citizens and
respecting the territorial integrity of
their neighbors;
(6) that the United States, other
NATO member nations, and NATO itself
should furnish appropriate assistance to
facilitate the transition of Poland, Hun-
gary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia to
full NATO membership;
(7) to reaffirm article X of the North
Atlantic Treaty and the policy decision of
the North Atlantic Council on December
1, 1994, that—
(A) each new member nation may
be admitted to NATO only by amend-
ment to the North Atlantic Treaty;
and
(B) each current NATO member
nation will have to complete the trea-
ty amendment ratification process for
the admission of each new member
nation to NATO, subject to the inter-
nal legal processes of each current
NATO member nation, and that in the
142
case of the United States, the treaty
amendment ratification process will
require advice and consent of two-
thirds of the members of the United
States Senate present and voting;
(8) that the expansion of NATO
should be defensive in nature and should
occur in a manner that increases stability
for all nations of Europe, including both
NATO member nations and non-NATO
member nations;
(9) that NATO and its member na-
tions should cooperate closely with Rus-
sia on security issues and work to
strengthen other structures of security
cooperation in Europe, including the Or-
ganization on Security and Cooperation
in Europe; and
(10) that other European countries
emerging from communist domination
may be in a position at a future date to
further the principles of the North Atlan-
tic Treaty and to contribute to the secu-
rity of the North Atlantic area, and at the
appropriate time they should receive as-
143
sistance to facilitate their transition to
full NATO membership and should be in-
vited to become full NATO members.
SEC. 604. REVISIONS TO PROGRAM TO FACILITATE TRANSI-
TION TO NATO MEMBERSHIP.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
PROGRAM.—Sub-
section (a) of section 203 of the NATO Partici-
pation Act of 1994 (title II of Public Law 103–
447; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
PROGRAM.—The
President shall establish a program to assist
in the transition to full NATO membership of
Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and
Slovakia and any other European country
emerging from communist domination that is
designated by the President under subsection
(d)(2).’’.
(b) ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—
(1) 
DESIGNATED
COUNTRIES.—Sub-
section (d) of such section is amended to
read as follows:
‘‘(d) 
DESIGNATION
OF
ELIGIBLE
COUN-
TRIES.—
144
‘‘(1) SPECIFIED
COUNTRIES.—The fol-
lowing countries are hereby designated
for purposes of this title: Poland, Hun-
gary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.
‘‘(2) AUTHORITY FOR PRESIDENT TO DES-
IGNATE
OTHER
EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES
EMERGING FROM COMMUNIST DOMINATION.—
The President may designate other Euro-
pean countries emerging from communist
domination (as defined in section 206) to
receive assistance under the program es-
tablished under subsection (a). The Presi-
dent may make such a designation in the
case of any such country only if the
President determines, and reports to the
designated 
congressional 
committees,
that such country—
‘‘(A) 
has 
made 
significant
progress toward establishing—
‘‘(i) shared values and inter-
ests;
‘‘(ii) democratic governments;
‘‘(iii) free market economies;
‘‘(iv) civilian control of the
military, of the police, and of the
145
intelligence and other security
services, so that these organiza-
tions do not pose a threat to
democratic institutions, neighbor-
ing countries, or the security of
NATO or the United States;
‘‘(v) adherence to the rule of
law and to the values, principles,
and political commitments set
forth in the Helsinki Final Act
and other declarations by the
members of the Organization on
Security and Cooperation in Eu-
rope;
‘‘(vi) commitment to further
the principles of NATO and to
contribute to the security of the
North Atlantic area;
‘‘(vii) commitment and ability
to accept the obligations, respon-
sibilities, and costs of NATO mem-
bership; and
‘‘(viii) commitment and ability
to implement infrastructure de-
velopment activities that will fa-
146
cilitate participation in and sup-
port for NATO military activities;
and
‘‘(B) is likely, within five years of
such determination, to be in a posi-
tion to further the principles of the
North Atlantic Treaty and to contrib-
ute to the security of the North Atlan-
tic area.’’.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) Subsections (b) and (c) of such
section 
are 
amended 
by 
striking
‘‘countries described in such sub-
section’’ and inserting ‘‘countries des-
ignated under subsection (d)’’.
(B) Subsection (e) of such section
is amended—
(i) by striking ‘‘subsection (d)’’
and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(2)’’;
and
(ii) by inserting ‘‘(22 U.S.C.
2394)’’ before the period at the
end.
(C) Section 204(c) of such Act is
amended by striking ‘‘any other Part-
147
nership for Peace country designated
under section 203(d) of this title’’ and
inserting ‘‘any country designated
under section 203(d)(2)’’.
(c) TYPES OF ASSISTANCE.—
(1) ECONOMIC
SUPPORT
ASSISTANCE.—
Subsection (c) of section 203 of such Act
is amended—
(A) by redesignating paragraphs
(3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5),
respectively; and
(B) by inserting after paragraph
(2) the following new paragraph (3):
‘‘(3) Assistance under chapter 4 of
part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 (relating to the Economic Support
Fund).’’.
(2) ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of
such section is amended to read as
follows:
‘‘(f) ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE.—In carrying
out the program established under subsection
(a), the President may, in addition to the secu-
rity assistance authorized to be provided
148
under subsection (c), provide assistance to
countries designated under subsection (d)
from funds appropriated under the ‘Non-
proliferation and Disarmament Fund’ ac-
count.’’.
(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amend-
ment made by subparagraph (A) does
not apply with respect to funds ap-
propriated before the date of the en-
actment of this Act.
(d) DISQUALIFICATION
FROM
ASSISTANCE
FOR SUPPORT OF TERRORISM.—Section 203 of
such Act is further amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
‘‘(g) PROHIBITION ON PROVIDING ASSISTANCE
TO COUNTRIES THAT PROVIDE DEFENSE ARTI-
CLES TO COUNTRIES SUPPORTING INTERNATIONAL
TERRORISM.—The President may not provide
assistance to a country under the program es-
tablished under subsection (a) if such country
is selling or transferring defense articles to a
state that has repeatedly provided support for
acts of international terrorism, as determined
by the Secretary of State under section 6(j) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979.’’.
149
(e) REPORT PRIOR TO OBLIGATION OR EX-
PENDITURE OF FUNDS.—Section 203 of such Act
(as amended by subsection (d)) is further
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(h) REPORT PRIOR TO OBLIGATION OR EX-
PENDITURE OF FUNDS.—Prior to providing as-
sistance to a country for the first time
through the program established under sub-
section (a), the President shall transmit to the
designated congressional committees a report
with respect to that country that contains a
description of the following:
‘‘(1) The cost of membership in NATO
for the country and the amount that the
country is prepared to contribute to
NATO to pay for such cost of member-
ship.
‘‘(2) The amount that the United
States will contribute to facilitate transi-
tion to full NATO membership for the
country.
‘‘(3) The extent to which the admis-
sion to NATO of the country would con-
tribute to the security of the United
States.
150
‘‘(4) The views of other NATO member
nations regarding the admission to NATO
of the country and the amounts that such
other NATO member nations will contrib-
ute to facilitate transition to full NATO
membership for the country.’’.
(f) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 205 of the
NATO Participation Act of 1994 (title II of
Public Law 103–447; 22 U.S.C. 1928 note) is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘ANNUAL’’ in the sec-
tion heading before the first word;
(2) by inserting ‘‘annual’’ after ‘‘in-
clude in the’’ in the matter preceding
paragraph (1); and
(3) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by strik-
ing ‘‘and other’’ and all that follows
through the period at the end and insert-
ing ‘‘and any country designated by the
President pursuant to section 203(d)(2).’’.
(g) DEFINITIONS.—The NATO Participation
Act of 1994 (title II of Public Law 103–447; 22
U.S.C. 1928 note) is amended by adding at the
end the following new section:
151
‘‘SEC. 206. DEFINITIONS.
‘‘For purposes of this title:
‘‘(1) NATO.—The term ‘NATO’ means
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
‘‘(2) 
OTHER
EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES
EMERGING FROM COMMUNIST DOMINATION.—
The 
term 
‘other 
European 
countries
emerging from communist domination’
means any full and active participant in
the Partnership for Peace that—
‘‘(A) is located—
‘‘(i) in the territory of the
former Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics; or
‘‘(ii) in the territory of the
former Socialist Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia; or
‘‘(B) is among the following coun-
tries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ro-
mania, Bulgaria, or Albania.
‘‘(3) DESIGNATED CONGRESSIONAL COM-
MITTEES.—The term ‘designated congres-
sional committees’ means—
‘‘(A) the Committee on Inter-
national Relations, the Committee on
National Security, and the Committee
152
on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives; and
‘‘(B) the Committee on Foreign
Relations, the Committee on Armed
Services, and the Committee on Ap-
propriations of the Senate.’’.
TITLE VII—BUDGET FIREWALLS
SEC. 701. RESTORATION OF BUDGET FIREWALLS FOR DE-
FENSE SPENDING.
It is the sense of the Congress that so-
called ‘‘budget firewalls’’ between defense and
domestic discretionary spending should be es-
tablished for each of fiscal years 1996, 1997,
and 1998.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as
the ‘‘National Security Revitalization Act’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of con-
tents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
TITLE I—FINDINGS, POLICY, AND PURPOSES
Sec. 101. Findings.
Sec. 102. Policy.
Sec. 103. Purposes.
TITLE II—MISSILE DEFENSE
Sec. 201. Policy.
Sec. 202. Actions of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 203. Report to Congress.
153
TITLE III—ADVISORY COMMISSION ON REVITALIZATION
OF NATIONAL SECURITY
Sec. 301. Establishment.
Sec. 302. Composition.
Sec. 303. Duties.
Sec. 304. Reports.
Sec. 305. Powers.
Sec. 306. Commission procedures.
Sec. 307. Personnel matters.
Sec. 308. Termination of the commission.
Sec. 309. Funding.
TITLE IV—COMMAND OF UNITED STATES FORCES
Sec. 401. Limitation on expenditure of Department of Defense
funds for United States forces placed under United
Nations command or control.
Sec. 402. Limitation on placement of United States Armed
Forces under foreign control for a United Nations
peacekeeping activity.
TITLE V—UNITED NATIONS
Sec. 501. Credit against assessment for United States expendi-
tures in support of United Nations peacekeeping
operations.
Sec. 502. Codification of required notice to Congress of pro-
posed United Nations peacekeeping activities.
Sec. 503. Notice to Congress regarding United States contribu-
tions for United Nations peacekeeping activities.
Sec. 504. Revised notice to Congress regarding United States as-
sistance for United Nations peacekeeping activi-
ties.
Sec. 505. United States contributions to United Nations peace-
keeping activities.
Sec. 506. Reimbursement to the United States for in-kind con-
tributions to United Nations peacekeeping activi-
ties.
Sec. 507. Prohibition on use of funds to pay United States as-
sessed or voluntary contribution for United Na-
tions peacekeeping activities unless Department of
Defense reimbursed by United Nations for certain
goods and services.
Sec. 508. Limitation on use of Department of Defense funds for
United States share of costs of United Nations
peacekeeping activities.
Sec. 509. Codification of limitation on amount of United States
assessed contributions for United Nations peace-
keeping operations.
Sec. 510. Buy American requirement.
Sec. 511. United Nations peacekeeping budgetary and manage-
ment reform.
Sec. 512. Conditions on provision of intelligence to the United
Nations.
154
TITLE VI—REVITALIZATION AND EXPANSION OF THE
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
Sec. 601. Short title.
Sec. 602. Findings.
Sec. 603. United States policy.
Sec. 604. Revisions to program to facilitate transition to NATO
membership.
TITLE VII—BUDGET FIREWALLS
Sec. 701. Restoration of budget firewalls for defense spending.
TITLE I—FINDINGS, POLICY, AND
PURPOSES
SEC. 101. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) Dramatic changes in the geo-polit-
ical and military landscape during the
last decade have had significant impacts
on United States security.
(2) Those changes include the breakup
of the Warsaw Pact alliance, the disinte-
gration of the Soviet Union, and an in-
crease in regional instability and conflict.
(3) While the magnitude and implica-
tions of these and other changes continues
to evolve, the world remains an unstable
and dangerous place. This uncertainty
mandates the need for an on-going proc-
ess to establish an appropriate national
security strategy and the forces needed to
implement that strategy.
155
(4) The centerpiece of the defense
strategy of the Administration, the review
of the Department of Defense conducted
by the Secretary of Defense in 1993 known
as the ‘‘Bottom Up Review’’, determined
that United States forces must be—
(A) prepared to fight and win two
nearly simultaneous Major Regional
Conflicts;
(B) able to sustain robust overseas
presence in peacetime;
(C) prepared for a variety of re-
gional contingencies; and
(D) able to deter and prevent at-
tacks with weapons of mass destruc-
tion against United States territory
and forces and the territory and
forces of our allies.
(5) The Bottom Up Review also rec-
ommended significant reductions in mili-
tary forces, including reduction in the
number of Navy ships by one-third, the
number of Air Force wings by almost one-
half, and the level of funding for missile
defenses by over 50 percent.
156
(6) The General Accounting Office and
the Congressional Budget Office have esti-
mated that the mismatch between even the
restrictive Bottom Up Review force and
the Administration defense budget may be
up to anywhere from $65,000,000,000 to
$150,000,000,000.
(7) Since January 1993, presidential
budgets and budget plans have set forth a
reduction 
in 
defense 
spending 
of
$156,000,000,000 through fiscal year 1999.
(8) The fiscal year 1995 budget is the
10th consecutive year of reductions in real
defense spending and, with the exception
of fiscal year 1948, represents the lowest
percentage of gross domestic product for
any defense budget since World War II.
(9) During fiscal year 1995, the num-
ber of active duty, reserve component, and
civilian personnel of the Department of
Defense will be reduced by 182,000, a rate
of over 15,000 per month or over 500 per
day. The Bureau of Labor Statistics esti-
mates that 1,200,000 defense-related pri-
vate sector jobs will be lost by 1997.
157
(10) Despite severe reductions and
shortfalls in defense funding and force
structure, since 1993 United States mili-
tary forces have been deployed more often
and committed to more peacetime mis-
sions per year than ever before. Most of
these missions involve United Nations
peacekeeping and humanitarian efforts.
At the end of fiscal year 1994, over 70,000
United States personnel were serving in
such regions as Iraq, Bosnia, Macedonia,
the Adriatic Sea, Rwanda, and the Carib-
bean Sea for missions involving Haiti and
Cuba.
(11) Despite the dramatic increase in
the pace of operations and the diversion
of training and exercise funds to cover the
costs of unbudgeted contingency oper-
ations, the Armed Forces of the United
States remain the most capable, moti-
vated, and effective military force in the
world. The ability to successfully deploy
and maintain support for the range of on-
going 
contingency 
operations 
dem-
158
onstrates the continued quality and pro-
fessionalism of our troops.
(12) However, persistent indications of
declining 
readiness 
demonstrate 
that
military units are entering the early stage
of a long-term systemic readiness problem.
This downward readiness trend risks a re-
turn to the ‘‘hollow forces’’ of the 1970s.
(13) At the end of fiscal year 1994, one-
third of the units in the Army contingency
force and all of the forward-deployed and
follow-on Army divisions were reporting a
reduced state of military readiness. Dur-
ing fiscal year 1994, training readiness
declined for the Navy’s Atlantic and Pa-
cific fleets. Training funding shortfalls
also resulted in a grounding of Navy and
Marine Corps aircraft squadrons and
cancellation and curtailment of Army
training exercises. Marine and naval per-
sonnel are not maintaining the standard
12- to 18-month respite between six-month
deployments away from home.
(14) The significant increase in de-
ployments in support of peacekeeping, hu-
159
manitarian, and contingency operations
has placed great personnel tempo stress
on many critical operational units.
(15) A real commitment to equitable
compensation and protection of quality-of-
life programs for servicemembers and
their families is an esssential component
to ensuring high personnel morale and
sustaining force readiness. However, as of
January 1, 1995, military pay is approxi-
mately 12.8 percent below comparable ci-
vilian levels. As a result, it is estimated
that close to 17,000 junior enlisted person-
nel have to rely on food stamps and the
Department of Defense will soon begin
providing supplementary food benefits to
an estimated 11,000 military personnel
and dependents living overseas.
(16) Critical long-term modernization
programs continue to be delayed or can-
celled as resources are diverted to cover
short-term personnel and readiness short-
falls resulting from an underfunded de-
fense budget and an overextended force,
160
threatening the technological superiority
of future United States forces.
(17) The fiscal year 1995 defense budg-
et failed to meet the current force struc-
ture goal of 184 modern long-range bomb-
ers, as established in the Bottom-Up Re-
view. Unless this long-range bomber capa-
bility shortfall is addressed promptly, the
Nation’s ability to project force will be un-
dermined and the existing bomber indus-
trial base may be placed at risk.
(18) The Administration has initially
agreed to or proposed treaty limitations,
or has unilaterally adopted positions,
that prohibit the United States from test-
ing or deploying effective missile defense
systems.
(19) United Nations assessments to the
United States for peacekeeping missions
totaled over $1,000,000,000 in 1994. The
United States is assessed 31.7 percent of
annual United Nations costs for peace-
keeping and other United Nations mis-
sions. 
The 
next 
highest 
contributor,
Japan, only pays 12.5 percent of such
161
costs. The Department of Defense also in-
curs hundreds of millions of dollars in
costs every year for United States military
participation in United Nations peace-
keeping or humanitarian missions, most
of which are not reimbursed by the United
Nations. For fiscal year 1994, these De-
partment of Defense costs totaled over
$1,721,000,000.
SEC. 102. POLICY.
The Congress is committed to providing
adequate resources to protect the national se-
curity interests of the United States, including
the resources necessary—
(1) to provide for sufficient forces to
meet the national security strategy of
being able to fight and win two nearly si-
multaneously major regional conflicts;
(2) to provide pay and benefits nec-
essary for members of the Armed Forces
(including 
members 
of 
the 
National
Guard and Reserve as well as active duty
members) to begin closing the gap be-
tween rates of civilian pay and rates of
military pay;
162
(3) to maintain a high quality-of-life
for military personnel and their depend-
ents;
(4) to maintain a high level of mili-
tary readiness and take all necessary
steps to avoid a return to the ‘‘hollow
forces’’ of the 1970s;
(5) to fully provide for the necessary
modernization of United States military
forces in order to ensure their techno-
logical superiority over any adversary;
and
(6) to develop and deploy at the earli-
est practical date highly effective na-
tional and theater missile defense systems.
SEC. 103. PURPOSES.
The purposes of this Act are—
(1) to establish an advisory commis-
sion to assess United States military needs
and address the problems posed by the
continuing downward spiral of defense
spending;
(2) to commit the United States to ac-
celerate the development and deployment
163
of theater and national ballistic missile
defense capabilities;
(3) to restrict deployment of United
States forces to missions that are in the
national security interest of the United
States;
(4) to maintain adequate command
and control by United States personnel of
United States forces participating in
United Nations peacekeeping operations;
(5) to reduce the cost to the United
States of United Nations peacekeeping ac-
tivities and to press for reforms in the
United Nations management practices;
and
(6) to reemphasize the commitment of
the United States to a strong and viable
North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
TITLE II—MISSILE DEFENSE
SEC. 201. POLICY.
It shall be the policy of the United States
to—
(1) deploy at the earliest practical
date an antiballistic missile system that is
capable of providing a highly effective de-
164
fense of the United States against ballistic
missile attacks; and
(2) provide at the earliest practical
date highly effective theater missile de-
fenses (TMDs) to forward-deployed and ex-
peditionary elements of the Armed Forces
of the United States and to friendly forces
and allies of the United States.
SEC. 202. ACTIONS OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.
(a) ABM SYSTEMS.—The Secretary of De-
fense shall develop for deployment at the earli-
est practical date a cost-effective, operation-
ally effective antiballistic missile system de-
signed to protect the United States against
ballistic missile attacks.
(b) 
ADVANCED
THEATER
MISSILE
DE-
FENSES.—The Secretary of Defense shall de-
velop for deployment at the earliest practical
date advanced theater missile defense systems.
SEC. 203. REPORT TO CONGRESS.
(a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 60 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the con-
gressional defense committees a plan for the
deployment of an antiballistic missile system
165
pursuant to section 202(a) and for the deploy-
ment of theater missile defense systems pursu-
ant to section 202(b).
(b) 
CONGRESSIONAL
DEFENSE
COMMIT-
TEES.—For purposes of this section, the term
‘‘congressional defense committees’’ means—
(1) the Committee on National Secu-
rity and the Committee on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Appropriations of
the Senate.
TITLE 
III—ADVISORY 
COMMIS-
SION ON REVITALIZATION OF
NATIONAL SECURITY
SEC. 301. ESTABLISHMENT.
There is hereby established an advisory
commission to be known as the ‘‘Revitalization
of National Security Commission’’ (hereinafter
in this title referred to as the ‘‘Commission’’).
SEC. 302. COMPOSITION.
(a) APPOINTMENT.—The Commission shall
be composed of 12 members, appointed as fol-
lows:
166
(1) Four members shall be appointed
by the President.
(2) Four members shall be appointed
by the Speaker of the House of Represent-
atives, one of whom shall be appointed
upon the recommendation of the minority
leader of the House of Representatives.
(3) Four members shall be appointed
by the president pro tempore of the Sen-
ate, three of whom shall be appointed
upon the recommendation of the majority
leader of the Senate and one of whom
shall be appointed upon the recommenda-
tion of the minority leader of the Senate.
(b) QUALIFICATIONS.—The members of the
Commission shall be appointed from among
persons having knowledge and experience in
defense and foreign policy.
(c) TERM OF MEMBERS; VACANCIES.—Mem-
bers of the Commission shall be appointed for
the life of the Commission. A vacancy on the
Commission shall not affect its powers, but
shall be filled in the same manner as the origi-
nal appointment was made.
167
(d) COMMENCEMENT.—The members of the
Commission shall be appointed not later than
21 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act. The Commission shall convene its first
meeting to carry out its duties under this sec-
tion 14 days after seven members of the Com-
mission have been appointed.
(e) CHAIRMAN.—The chairman of the Com-
mission shall be designated jointly by the
Speaker of the House of Representatives and
the majority leader of the Senate (after con-
sultation with the minority leader of the House
of Representatives and the minority leader of
the Senate) from among members of the Com-
mission appointed under subsection (a)(2) or
(a)(3).
SEC. 303. DUTIES.
(a) COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW.—The Commis-
sion shall conduct a comprehensive review of
the long-term national security needs of the
United States. The review shall include the fol-
lowing:
(1) An assessment of the need for a
new national security strategy and, if it is
168
determined that such a new strategy is
needed, identification of such a strategy.
(2) An assessment of the need for a
new national military strategy and, if it is
determined that such a new strategy is
needed, identification of such a strategy.
(3) An assessment of the military force
structure necessary to support the new
strategies identified under paragraphs (1)
and (2).
(4) An assessment of force moderniza-
tion requirements necessary to support the
new strategies identified under para-
graphs (1) and (2).
(5) An assessment of military infra-
structure requirements necessary to sup-
port the new strategies identified under
paragraphs (1) and (2).
(6) An assessment of the funding
needs of the Department of Defense nec-
essary to support the long-term national
security 
requirements 
of 
the 
United
States.
(7) An assessment of the adequacy of
the force structure recommended in the
169
1993 Bottom-Up Review in executing the
national military strategy.
(8) An assessment of the adequacy of
the current future-years defense plan in
fully funding the Bottom-Up Review force
structure while maintaining adequate
force modernization and military readi-
ness objectives.
(9) An assessment of the level of de-
fense funds expended on non-defense pro-
grams.
(10) An assessment of the costs to the
United States of expanding the member-
ship of the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation.
(11) An assessment of the elements of
military pay and allowances constituting
the regular military compensation of
members of the Armed Forces and the de-
velopment 
of 
recommendations 
for
changes in those elements in order to end
the dependence of some members of the
Armed Forces and their families on Fed-
eral and local assistance programs.