ning on November 1, 1995, and ending on De-
cember 31, 1995.
(E) 
DEAUTHORIZATION.—The 
LaFarge
Dam and Lake portion of the project referred
to in paragraph (1) is not authorized after the
date of the transfer under this paragraph.
(F) INTERIM MANAGEMENT AND MAINTE-
NANCE.—The Secretary shall continue to man-
age and maintain the LaFarge Dam and Lake
portion of the project referred to in paragraph
(1) until the date of the transfer under this
subsection.
(3) COMPLETION OF PROJECT FEATURES.—
(A) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall
undertake the completion of the following fea-
tures of the project referred to in paragraph
(1):
(i) The continued relocation of State
highway route 131 and county highway
routes P and F substantially in accordance
with plans contained in Design Memoran-
dum No. 6, Relocation-LaFarge Reservoir,
dated June 1970; except that the reloca-
tion shall generally follow the existing road
rights-of-way through the Kickapoo Valley.
(ii) Environmental cleanup and site
restoration of abandoned wells, farm sites,
and safety modifications to the water con-
trol structures.
(iii) Cultural resource activities to
meet the requirements of Federal law.
(B) PARTICIPATION BY STATE OF WISCON-
SIN.—In undertaking the completion of the fea-
tures described in subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary shall determine the requirements of the
State of Wisconsin on the location and design
of each such feature.
(4) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated to carry out this subsection for fiscal
years 
beginning 
after 
September 
30, 
1994,
$17,000,000.
SEC. 103. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that
the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C.
701s):
(1) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—A project for flood
control in Carondelet and Germania neighborhoods
in St. Louis, Missouri.
(2) FULMER
CREEK, VILLAGE
OF
MOHAWK,
NEW
YORK.—A project for flood control, Fulmer
Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York.
(3) MOYER CREEK, VILLAGE OF FRANKFORT,
NEW
YORK.—A project for flood control, Moyer
Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York.
(4) SAUQUOIT
CREEK, 
WHITESBORO, 
NEW
YORK.—A project for flood control, Sauquoit Creek,
Whitesboro, New York.
(5) STEELE CREEK, VILLAGE OF ILION, NEW
YORK.—A project for flood control, Steele Creek,
Village of Ilion, New York.
(6) SUNBURY, PENNSYLVANIA.—A project for
flood control, Susquehanna River, at Sunbury, Penn-
sylvania, to rehabilitate existing flood control struc-
tures.
SEC. 104. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that
the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under
section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C.
701r):
(1) WABASH
RIVER, NEW
HARMONY, INDI-
ANA.—A project for bank stabilization to prevent
further erosion of the east bank of the Wabash River
in the vicinity of New Harmony, Indiana.
(2) HICKMAN BLUFF, HICKMAN, KENTUCKY.—
A project for bank stabilization, Hickman Bluff,
Hickman, Kentucky.
(3) 
WICKLIFFE, 
BALLARD
COUNTY, 
KEN-
TUCKY.—A project for bank stabilization, Wickliffe,
Ballard County, Kentucky, on the Mississippi River
between the existing Wickliffe and Mayfield revet-
ments.
(4) ALLEGHENY
RIVER
AT
OIL
CITY, PENN-
SYLVANIA.—A project for bank stabilization to ad-
dress erosion problems affecting the pipeline cross-
ing the Allegheny River at Oil City, Pennsylvania,
including measures to address erosion affecting the
pipeline in the bed of the Allegheny River and its ad-
jacent banks.
SEC. 105. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that
the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33
U.S.C. 577):
(1) AKUTAN, ALASKA.—A navigation project for
Akutan, Alaska, consisting of a bulkhead and a wave
barrier.
(2) KING COVE, ALASKA.—A navigation project
for King Cove, Alaska, consisting of a small rubble
mound structure and a vertical wave screen.
(3) 
TACONITE, 
MINNESOTA.—A 
navigation
project for Taconite, Minnesota.
(4) TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.—A navigation
project for Two Harbors, Minnesota.
(5) BROOKLYN, NEW
YORK.—A project for
navigation, Brooklyn, New York, including restora-
tion of the pier and related navigation support struc-
tures, at the Sixty-Ninth Street Pier.
SEC. 106. SMALL SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS.
(a) PROJECT
AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Secretary
shall conduct a study for each of the following projects,
and if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible,
shall carry out the project under section 3 of the Shoreline
Protection Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g):
(1) FAULKNER’S
ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.—A
project for shoreline protection, Faulkner’s Island,
Connecticut.
(2) SYLVAN
BEACH
BREAKWATER, TOWN
OF
VERONA, ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK.—A project
for shoreline protection, Sylvan Beach Breakwater,
town of Verona, Oneida County, New York.
(b) COST SHARING AGREEMENT.—In carrying out
the project authorized by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary
shall enter into an agreement with the property owner of
the project to determine allocation of the project costs.
SEC. 107. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION AND BEACH ERO-
SION CONTROL PROJECT, WATSON ISLAND
PARK, MIAMI, FLORIDA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for
bank stabilization and beach erosion control, Watson Is-
land Park, Miami, Florida, and, if the Secretary deter-
mines that the project is feasible, shall carry out the
project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946
(33 U.S.C. 701r) and section 103 of the River and Harbor
Act of 1962 (33 U.S.C. 426g).
SEC. 108. SMALL SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL
PROJECT, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LITTLE FALLS,
MINNESOTA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for
snagging and sediment removal, Mississippi River, Little
Falls, Minnesota, and, if the Secretary determines that the
project is feasible, shall carry out the project under section
3 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (33
U.S.C. 603a; 59 Stat. 23).
SEC. 109. UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER, EL DORADO COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for
environmental restoration, Upper Truckee River, El Do-
rado County, California, including measures for restora-
tion of degraded wetlands and wildlife enhancement, and,
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible,
shall carry out the project under section 1135 of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
2309a).
SEC. 110. MUSKINGUM RIVER, OHIO.
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility
of carrying out a major rehabilitation project for the locks
on the Muskingum River, Ohio, constructed under the Na-
tional Industrial Recovery Act and, if the Secretary deter-
mines that project is feasible, carry out the project.
SEC. 111. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) GRAND PRAIRIE REGION
AND BAYOU METO
BASIN, ARKANSAS.—The project for flood control, Grand
Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas, author-
ized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64
Stat. 174) and deauthorized pursuant to section
1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)), is authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
(b) WHITE RIVER, ARKANSAS.—The project for navi-
gation, White River Navigation to Batesville, Arkansas,
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139) and deauthorized
by section 52(b) of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1988 (102 Stat. 4045), is authorized to be carried out
by the Secretary.
SEC. 112. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN
PROJECTS.
(a) GENERAL RULE.—Notwithstanding section 1001
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 579a), the following projects shall remain author-
ized to be carried out by the Secretary:
(1) ONTONAGON HARBOR, ONTONAGON COUN-
TY, 
MICHIGAN.—The 
project 
for 
navigation,
Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, Michigan,
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor
Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176).
(2) ALPENA HARBOR, MICHIGAN.—The project
for navigation, Alpena Harbor, Michigan, authorized
by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965
(79 Stat. 1090).
(3) CEDAR
RIVER
HARBOR, MICHIGAN.—The
project for navigation, Cedar River Harbor, Michi-
gan, authorized by section 301 of the River and
Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090).
(4) CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICHIGAN.—The
project for navigation, Cross Village Harbor, Michi-
gan, authorized by section 101 of the River and
Harbor Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1405).
(5) KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.—The
project for navigation, Knife River Harbor, Min-
nesota, authorized by section 100 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
(b) LIMITATION.—A project described in subsection
(a) shall not be authorized for construction after the last
day of the 5-year period that begins on the date of the
enactment of this Act unless, during such period, funds
have been obligated for the construction (including plan-
ning and design) of the project.
SEC. 113. REUSE OF WASTE WATER.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to
provide assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying
out projects described in subsection (c) for the beneficial
reuse of waste water. Such assistance may be in the form
of technical, planning, design, and construction assistance.
If the Secretary is to provide any design or engineering
assistance to carry out a project under this section, the
Secretary shall obtain by procurement from private
sources all services necessary for the Secretary to provide
such assistance, unless the Secretary finds that—
(1) the service would require the use of a new
technology unavailable in the private sector; or
(2) a solicitation or request for proposal has
failed to attract 2 or more bids or proposals.
(b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost
of assistance provided under this section shall be 55 per-
cent. The non-Federal share shall be subject to the ability
of the non-Federal interest to pay, including the proce-
dures and regulations relating to ability to pay established
under section 103(m) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986.
(c) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS.—The projects for which
the Secretary is authorized to provide assistance under
subsection (a) are as follows:
(1) WEST
DADE
REGIONAL
REUSE
FACILITY,
FLORIDA.—The West Dade Regional reuse facility,
Florida, to increase water supply to the Everglades
National Park and associated natural systems.
(2) CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA.—Charlotte
County, Florida, for aquifer storage and recovery of
reclaimed water.
(3) ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—Alameda
County Phase I waste water reclamation project
serving the cities of Fremont, Union City, and New-
ark, California.
(4) SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA.—The city of
Sunnyvale, California, Phase II water reclamation
project.
(5) PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA.—The city of Palo
Alto, Phase I water reclamation project.
(6) SOUTH BAYSIDE, CALIFORNIA.—The South
Bayside System Authority for Phase I of the Red-
wood City-South Bayside System Authority water
reclamation program serving Redwood City, Menlo
Park, and San Carlos, California.
(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$39,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until ex-
pended.
SEC. 114. STUDIES.
(a) GILA RIVER, GILLESPIE DAM TO YUMA, ARI-
ZONA.—The Secretary shall conduct a study of the fea-
sibility of implementing water conservation measures at
the Gila River, Gillespie Dam to Yuma, Arizona, including
an evaluation of the reoperation of Painted Rock Reservoir
as well as other structural and nonstructural features.
(b) NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of the relationship of flooding in Nogales, Ari-
zona, and floodflows emanating from Mexico.
(2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall transmit to
Congress a report on the results of the study con-
ducted under paragraph (1), together with rec-
ommendations concerning the appropriate level of
non-Federal participation in the project for flood
control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, Arizona, au-
thorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606).
(c) LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFOR-
NIA.—The Secretary shall conduct a study of the advis-
ability of modifying the project for flood control, Lake
Elsinore, Riverside County, California, authorized pursu-
ant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33
U.S.C. 701s), in order to provide for water conservation
storage up to 1249 feet mean sea level.
(d) SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CALIFORNIA.—
The Secretary shall complete the feasibility study for the
breakwater project, Santa Monica, California, and shall
consider as commercial benefits for purposes of section
119 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 benefits from
reestablishment of past charter fishing vessel accommoda-
tion activities which existed in the area prior to damage
of the breakwater structure.
(e) YOLO
BYPASS, SACRAMENTO-SAN
JOAQUIN
DELTA, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall study the ad-
visability of acquiring land in the vicinity of the Yolo By-
pass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, for
the purpose of environmental mitigation for the flood con-
trol project for Sacramento, California, and other water
resources projects in the area.
(f) CHICAGO LOCK AND THOMAS J. O’BRIEN LOCK,
ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall conduct a study to deter-
mine the feasibility of making such structural repairs as
are necessary to prevent leakage through the Chicago
Lock and the Thomas J. O’Brien Lock, Illinois, and to
determine the need for installing permanent flow measure-
ment equipment at such locks to measure any leakage.
(g) BEAUTY CREEK WATERSHED, VALPARAISO CITY,
PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA.—The Secretary shall conduct
a study to assess the feasibility of implementing
streambank erosion control measures and flood control
measures within the Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso
City, Porter County, Indiana.
(h) INDIANA HARBOR CANAL, EAST CHICAGO, LAKE
COUNTY, INDIANA.—The Secretary shall conduct a study
of the feasibility of including environmental and rec-
reational features, including a vegetation buffer, as part
of the project for navigation, Indiana Harbor Canal, East
Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, authorized by the Rivers
and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36
Stat. 658).
(i) JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of the feasibility of carrying out major reha-
bilitation of the levee at Jeffersonville, Indiana, au-
thorized pursuant to section 4 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217).
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of
the study conducted under paragraph (1).
(j) KNIGHT TOWNSHIP LEVEE, EVANSVILLE, INDI-
ANA.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of the feasibility of carrying out major reha-
bilitation of the Knight Township levee at Evans-
ville, Indiana, authorized pursuant to section 4 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of June 28, 1938 (52
Stat. 1217).
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of
the study conducted under paragraph (1).
(k) KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.—The Secretary shall
conduct a study of the feasibility of implementing meas-
ures to restore Koontz Lake, Indiana, including measures
to remove silt, sediment, nutrients, aquatic growth, and
other noxious materials from Koontz Lake, measures to
improve public access facilities to Koontz Lake, and meas-
ures to prevent or abate the deposit of sediments and nu-
trients in Koontz Lake.
(l) LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of the impact of the project for flood control,
Little Calumet River, Indiana, authorized by section
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), on flooding and water qual-
ity in the vicinity of the Black Oak area of Gary, In-
diana.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of
the study conducted under paragraph (1), together
with recommendations for cost-effective remediation
of impacts described in paragraph (1).
(3) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of
the cost of the study to be conducted under para-
graph (1) shall be 100 percent.
(m) CALCASIEU PARISH, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary
shall conduct a study of the economic, engineering, and
environmental feasibility of providing additional water
supply for Calcasieu Parish and vicinity in southwest Lou-
isiana, with a view toward providing for future regional
increases in municipal and industrial water demand and
for increasing agricultural production.
(n) CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, HACKBERRY, LOU-
ISIANA.—The Secretary shall conduct a study to deter-
mine the need for improved navigation and related support
service structures in the vicinity of the Calcasieu Ship
Channel, Hackberry, Louisiana.
(o) CROWLEY, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary shall con-
duct a study of the feasibility of implementing measures
for controlling erosion on Bayou Blanc immediately down-
stream from the Louisiana State Highway Route 13
bridge crossing.
(p) RIVER DES PERES, SAINT LOUIS COUNTY, MIS-
SOURI.—In conducting the feasibility study of potential
flood control measures for the River Des Peres, Saint
Louis County, Missouri, the Secretary shall include poten-
tial storm water runoff and related improvements and
shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer
District.
(q) PORT OF NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY.—
(1) STUDY
OF
MEASURES
TO
REDUCE
SEDI-
MENT DEPOSITION.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of measures that could be used to reduce sedi-
ment deposition in the vicinity of the Port of New
York-New Jersey for the purpose of reducing the
volumes to be dredged for navigation projects in the
Port.
(2) DREDGED
MATERIAL
DISPOSAL
STUDY.—
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine
the feasibility of constructing and operating an un-
derwater confined dredged material disposal site in
the Port of New York-New Jersey which could ac-
commodate as much as 250,000 cubic yards of
dredged materials for the purpose of demonstrating
the feasibility of underwater confined disposal pit as
an environmentally suitable method of containing
certain sediments.
(3) REPORT.—The Secretary shall transmit to
Congress a report on the results of the studies con-
ducted under this subsection, together with any rec-
ommendations of the Secretary concerning reduction
of sediment deposition referred to in paragraph (1).
(r) MAUMEE RIVER, OHIO.—The Secretary shall
study the feasibility of realigning and extending the Fed-
eral channel, Maumee River, Lucas County, Ohio.
(s) SNAKE AND COLUMBIA RIVERS, OREGON, WASH-
INGTON, AND IDAHO.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study to assess the authority of the Secretary to im-
plement salmon protection measures in operating
dams on the Snake and Columbia Rivers, Oregon,
Washington, and Idaho.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of
the study conducted under paragraph (1), including
recommendations for any additional authority need-
ed to implement such protection measures.
(t) CUMBERLAND RIVER, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TEN-
NESSEE.—
(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study of the benefits of establishing a greenway
along the Cumberland River, Davidson County, Ten-
nessee.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of
the study conducted under paragraph (1).
(u) JOHN H. KERR AND PHILPOTT RESERVOIRS,
VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA.—The Secretary shall
conduct a study of the advisability of modifying the multi-
purpose project for the John H. Kerr and Philpott Res-
ervoirs, Virginia and North Carolina, authorized by sec-
tion 10 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944
(58 Stat. 894)—
(1) to include environmental enhancement, pub-
lic recreational opportunities, regional economic de-
velopment, and increased public participation in
shoreline management as management goals of the
project; and
(2) to authorize the use of power sale revenues
for operation, maintenance, and capital improve-
ments for the project.
SEC. 115. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The following projects are not au-
thorized after the date of the enactment of this Act:
(1) BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.—The
following portion of the project for navigation,
Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by sec-
tion 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72
Stat. 297): A 2-acre anchorage area with a depth of
6 feet at the head of Johnsons River between the ex-
isting Federal channel and Hollisters Dam.
(2) JOHNSONS RIVER CHANNEL, BRIDGEPORT
HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.—The following portion of
the project for navigation, Johnsons River Channel,
Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the
first section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of July
24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634): Northerly of a line across
the Federal channel. The coordinates of such line
are N 123318.35, E 486301.68 and N 123257.15,
E 486380.77.
(3) SOUTHPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.—
(A) 
DEAUTHORIZATION
PORTION
OF
PROJECT.—The 
following 
portions 
of 
the
project for navigation, Southport Harbor, Con-
necticut, authorized by the first section of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935
(49 Stat. 1029):
(i) The 6-foot deep anchorage located
at the head of the project.
(ii) The portion of the 9-foot deep
channel beginning at a bend in the channel
whose coordinates are north 109131.16,
east 452653.32 running thence in a north-
easterly direction about 943.01 feet to a
point 
whose 
coordinates 
are 
north
109635.22, east 453450.31 running thence
in a southeasterly direction about 22.66
feet to a point whose coordinates are north
109617.15, east 453463.98 running thence
in a southwesterly direction about 945.18
feet to the point of beginning.
(B) REMAINDER.—The remaining portion
of the project referred to in subparagraph (A)
northerly of a line whose coordinates are north
108699.15, 
east 
452768.36 
and 
north
108655.66, east 452858.73 shall be redesig-
nated as an anchorage.
(4) FALMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS.—The follow-
ing portions of the project for navigation, Falmouth
Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of
the River and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172):
(A) The portion commencing at a point
north 199286.37 east 844394.81 a line running
north 73 degrees 09 minutes 24.6 seconds east
440.44 feet to a point north 199413.99 east
844816.36, thence turning and running north
43 degrees 09 minutes 34.5 seconds east
119.99 feet to a point north 199501.52 east
844898.44, thence turning and running south
66 degrees 52 minutes 04.4 seconds east
547.66 feet returning to a point north
199286.37 east 844394.81.
(B) The portion commencing at a point
north 199647.42 east 845035.25 a line running
north 43 degrees 09 minutes 35.0 seconds east
767.14 feet to a point north 200207.01 east
845560.00, thence turning and running north
11 degrees 04 minutes 24.3 seconds west
380.08 feet to a point north 200580.01 east
845487.00, thence turning and running north
22 degrees 05 minutes 50.8 seconds east
1332.36 feet to a point north 201814.50 east
845988.21, thence turning and running north
02 degrees 54 minutes 15.7 seconds east 15.0
feet 
to 
a 
point 
north 
201829.48 
east
845988.97, thence turning and running south
23 degrees 36 minutes 31.9 seconds west
2381.38 feet returning to the point north
199647.42 east 845035.25.
(5) OSWEGATCHIE
RIVER, OGDENSBURG
NEW
YORK.—The portion of the Federal channel of the
project for navigation, Ogdensburg Harbor, New
York, authorized by the first section of the Rivers
and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910
(36 Stat. 635), as modified by the first section of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49
Stat. 1037), which is in the Oswegatchie River in
Ogdensburg, New York, from the southernmost
alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the
northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge.
(b) REDESIGNATION.—The portion of the project for
navigation Falmouth, Massachusetts, referred to in sub-
section (a)(4) upstream of a line designated by the 2
points north 199463.18 east 844496.40 and north
199350.36 east 844544.60 is redesignated as an anchor-
age area.
SEC. 116. NAMINGS.
(a) MILT BRANDT VISITORS CENTER, CALIFOR-
NIA.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—The visitors center at
Warm Springs Dam, California, authorized by sec-
tion 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat.
1192), shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Milt
Brandt Visitors Center’’.
(2) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the visitors center re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a
reference to the ‘‘Milt Brandt Visitors Center’’.
(b) WILLIAM H. NATCHER BRIDGE, MACEO, KEN-
TUCKY, AND ROCKPORT, INDIANA.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—The bridge on United
States Route 231 which crosses the Ohio River be-
tween Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William H.
Natcher Bridge’’.
(2) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the bridge referred to
in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
(c) J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, INDIANA.—
(1) REDESIGNATION.—The lake on the Wabash
River in Huntington and Wells Counties, Indiana,
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act
of 1958 (72 Stat. 312), and known as Huntington
Lake, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J. Ed-
ward Roush Lake’’.
(2) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the lake referred to
in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘J. Edward Roush Lake’’.
(d) LOCK AND DAM 4, RED RIVER WATERWAY, LOU-
ISIANA.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—Lock and Dam 4 of the
Red River Waterway, Louisiana, shall be known and
designated as the ‘‘Russell B. Long Lock and
Dam’’.
(2) LEGAL REFERENCES.—A reference in any
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the lock and dam re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a
reference to the ‘‘Russell B. Long Lock and Dam’’.
(e) LOCK AND DAM 3, RED RIVER WATERWAY, LOU-
ISIANA.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—Lock and Dam 3 of the
Red River Waterway, Louisiana, shall be known and
designated the ‘‘Edwin W. Edwards Lock and
Dam’’.
(2) LEGAL REFERENCES.—A reference in any
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the lock and dam re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a
reference to the ‘‘Edwin W. Edwards Lock and
Dam’’.
TITLE II—GENERALLY
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS
SEC. 201. RECREATION POLICY AND USER FEES.
(a) RECREATION POLICIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall provide
increased emphasis on and opportunities for recre-
ation at water resources projects operated, main-
tained, or constructed by the Corps of Engineers.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall transmit to Congress a report on specific meas-
ures taken to implement this subsection.
(b) RECREATION USER FEES.—Section 210(b) of the
Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d–3(b)) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(5) USE OF FEES COLLECTED AT FACILITY.—
The Secretary of the Army shall ensure that at least
an amount equal to the total amount of fees col-
lected at any project under this subsection in a fiscal
year beginning after September 30, 1994, are ex-
pended in the succeeding fiscal year at such project
for operation and maintenance of recreational facili-
ties at such project.’’.
SEC. 202. RECOVERY OF COSTS.
Amounts recovered under section 107 of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9607) for any response
action taken by the Secretary in support of the Army Civil
Works program shall be credited to the appropriate trust
fund account from which the cost of such response action
has been paid or will be charged.
SEC. 203. COST SHARING OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.
Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(5);
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (6) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the follow-
ing new paragraph:
‘‘(7) subject to section 906 of this Act, environ-
mental protection and restoration: 25 percent.’’.
SEC. 204. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS
BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.
(a) AUTHORITY.—Non-Federal interests are author-
ized to undertake flood control projects in the United
States, subject to obtaining any permits required pursuant
to Federal and State laws, in advance of actual construc-
tion.
(b) STUDIES AND ENGINEERING.—
(1) BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.—A non-Fed-
eral interest may prepare, for review and approval
by the Secretary, the necessary studies and engi-
neering for any construction to be undertaken pur-
suant to subsection (a).
(2) BY SECRETARY.—Upon request of an ap-
propriate non-Federal interest, the Secretary may
undertake all necessary studies and engineering for
any construction to be undertaken pursuant to sub-
section (a) and provide technical assistance in ob-
taining all necessary permits for such construction if
the non-Federal interest contracts with the Sec-
retary to furnish the United States funds for the
studies and engineering during the period that the
studies and engineering will be conducted.
(c) COMPLETION OF STUDIES.—The Secretary is au-
thorized to complete and transmit to the appropriate non-
Federal interests any study for flood control which was
initiated before the date of the enactment of this Act or,
upon the request of such non-Federal interests, to termi-
nate the study and transmit the partially completed study
to such non-Federal interests for completion. Studies sub-
ject to this subsection shall be completed without regard
to the requirements of subsection (b).
(d) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT IMPROVEMENT.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Any non-Federal interest
which has received from the Secretary pursuant to
subsection (b) or (c) a favorable recommendation to
carry out a flood control project or separable ele-
ment thereof based on the results of completed stud-
ies and engineering for the project or element, may
carry out the project or element if a final environ-
mental impact statement has been filed for the
project or element.
(2) PERMITS.—Any plan of improvement pro-
posed to be implemented in accordance with this
subsection shall be deemed to satisfy the require-
ments for obtaining the appropriate permits required
under the Secretary’s authority and such permits
shall be granted subject to the non-Federal interest’s
acceptance of the terms and conditions of such per-
mits if the Secretary determines that the applicable
regulatory criteria and procedures have been satis-
fied.
(3) MONITORING.—The Secretary shall monitor
any project for which a permit is granted under this
subsection in order to ensure that such project is
constructed (and, in those cases where such activi-
ties will not be the responsibility of the Secretary,
operated and maintained) in accordance with the
terms and conditions of such permit.
(e) REIMBURSEMENT.—
(1) GENERAL RULE.—Subject to appropriation
Acts, the Secretary is authorized to reimburse any
non-Federal interest an amount equal to the esti-
mate of the Federal share, without interest, of the
cost of any authorized flood control project, or sepa-
rable element thereof, constructed pursuant to this
section—
(A) if, after authorization and before initi-
ation of construction of the project or separable
element, the Secretary approves the plans for
construction of such project by the non-Federal
interest; and
(B) if the Secretary finds, after a review of
studies and engineering prepared pursuant to
this section, that construction of the project or
separable element is economically justified and
environmentally acceptable.
(2) MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED IN REVIEW-
ING
PLANS.—In reviewing plans under this sub-
section, the Secretary shall consider budgetary and
programmatic priorities and other factors that the
Secretary deems appropriate.
(3) MONITORING.—The Secretary shall regu-
larly monitor and audit any project for flood control
constructed under this section by a non-Federal in-
terest in order to ensure that such construction is in
compliance with the plans approved by the Secretary
and that the costs are reasonable.
(4) LIMITATION ON REIMBURSEMENTS.—No re-
imbursement shall be made under this section unless
and until the Secretary has certified that the work
for which reimbursement is requested has been per-
formed in accordance with applicable permits and
approved plans.
(f) TREATMENT OF FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION
MEASURES.—For the purposes of this section, flood dam-
age prevention measures at or in the vicinity of Morgan
City and Berwick, Louisiana, shall be treated as an au-
thorized element of the Atchafalaya Basin feature of the
project for flood control, Mississippi River and Tribu-
taries.
SEC. 205. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1988 (102 Stat. 4022–4023) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by inserting ‘‘civil works’’
before ‘‘mission’’;
(2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d),
and (e) as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respec-
tively;
(3) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by
striking ‘‘(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘(c)’’;
(4) by striking subsection (f), as so redesig-
nated; and
(5) by inserting after subsection (a) the follow-
ing new subsection:
‘‘(b) PRE-AGREEMENT TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF
TECHNOLOGY.—If the Secretary determines that informa-
tion developed as a result of research and development ac-
tivities conducted by the Corps of Engineers is likely to
be subject to a cooperative research and development
agreement within 2 years of its development and that such
information would be a trade secret or commercial or fi-
nancial information that would be privileged or confiden-
tial if the information had been obtained from a non-Fed-
eral party participating in a cooperative research and de-
velopment agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-
Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, the Secretary
may provide appropriate protection against the dissemina-
tion of such information, including exemption from sub-
chapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, until
the earlier of the date the Secretary enters into such an
agreement with respect to such technology or the last day
of the 2-year period beginning on the date of such deter-
mination. Any technology covered by this section which be-
comes the subject of a cooperative research and develop-
ment agreement shall be accorded the protection provided
under section 12(c)(7)(B) of such Act (15 U.S.C.
3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if such technology had been developed
under a cooperative research and development agree-
ment.’’.
SEC. 206. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.
Section 13 of Public Law 92–367 (33 U.S.C. 467l),
is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting
the following: ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated
$500,000 for each fiscal year for the purpose of carrying
out this section.’’.
SEC. 207. MAINTENANCE, REHABILITATION, AND MOD-
ERNIZATION OF FACILITIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—In accomplishing the mainte-
nance, rehabilitation, and modernization of hydroelectric
power generating facilities at water resources projects
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army, the
Secretary is authorized to increase the efficiency of energy
production and the capacity of these facilities if, after con-
sulting with other appropriate Federal and State agencies,
the Secretary determines that such uprating—
(1) is economically justified and financially fea-
sible;
(2) will not result in significant adverse effects
on the other purposes for which the project is au-
thorized;
(3) will not result in significant adverse envi-
ronmental impacts; and
(4) will not involve major structural or oper-
ation changes in the project.
(b) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—
Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as affecting
the authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of
the Bonneville Power Administration under section 2406
of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d–1).
SEC. 208. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—At a water resources project
where the non-Federal interest is responsible for perform-
ing the operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabili-
tation of the project and the Federal Government is re-
sponsible for paying a portion of the operation, mainte-
nance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs, the Secretary
may provide, under terms and conditions acceptable to the
Secretary and the non-Federal interest, a payment of the
estimated total Federal share of such costs to the non-
Federal interest after completion of construction of the
project or a separable element thereof.
(b) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.—The amount to
be paid shall be equal to the present value of the Federal
payments over the life of the project, as agreed by the
Federal Government and the non-Federal interest, and
shall be computed using an interest rate determined by
the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration
current market yields on outstanding marketable obliga-
tions of the United States with maturities comparable to
the remaining life of the project.
(c) AGREEMENT.—The Secretary may make a pay-
ment under this section only if the non-Federal interest
has entered into a binding agreement with the Secretary
to perform the operation, maintenance, replacement, and
rehabilitation of the project or separable element. The
agreement must be in accordance with the requirements
of section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat.
1831) and must contain provisions specifying the terms
and conditions under which a payment may be made under
this section and the rights of, and remedies available to,
the Federal Government to recover all or a portion of a
payment made under this section in the event the non-
Federal interest suspends or terminates its performance
of operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation
of the project or separable element or fails to perform such
activities in a manner consistent with the agreement be-
tween the Secretary and the non-Federal interest.
(d) RELIEF FROM FUTURE OBLIGATIONS.—Except
as provided in subsection (c), a payment provided to the
non-Federal interest under this section shall relieve the
Government of any future obligations for paying any of
the operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilita-
tion costs for the project or separable element.
SEC. 209. LONG-TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT STRATE-
GIES.
(a) DEVELOPMENT.—The Secretary shall enter into
cooperative agreements with non-Federal sponsors of navi-
gation projects for development of long-term management
strategies for controlling sediments in such projects.
(b) CONTENTS OF STRATEGIES.—Each strategy de-
veloped under this section for a navigation project—
(1) shall include assessments of the following
with respect to the project: sediment rates and com-
position, sediment reduction options, dredging prac-
tices, long-term management of any dredged mate-
rial disposal facilities, remediation of such facilities,
and alternative disposal and reuse options;
(2) shall include a timetable for implementation
of the strategy; and