H. R. 1815—341
know that the practices were unlawful and a person of ordinary 
sense and understanding would not know the practices were unlaw-
ful. Good faith reliance on advice of counsel should be an important 
factor, among others, to consider in assessing whether a person 
of ordinary sense and understanding would have known the prac-
tices to be unlawful. Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to limit or extinguish any defense or protection otherwise available 
to any person or entity from suit, civil or criminal liability, or 
damages, or to provide immunity from prosecution for any criminal 
offense by the proper authorities. 
(b) COUNSEL.—The United States Government may provide 
or employ counsel, and pay counsel fees, court costs, bail, and 
other expenses incident to the representation of an officer, employee, 
member of the Armed Forces, or other agent described in subsection 
(a), with respect to any civil action or criminal prosecution arising 
out of practices described in that subsection, under the same condi-
tions, and to the same extent, to which such services and payments 
are authorized under section 1037 of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 1405. PROCEDURES FOR STATUS REVIEW OF DETAINEES OUTSIDE 
THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) SUBMITTAL
OF
PROCEDURES
FOR
STATUS
REVIEW
OF 
DETAINEES AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, AND IN AFGHANISTAN AND 
IRAQ.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on Armed 
Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House 
of Representatives a report setting forth—
(A) the procedures of the Combatant Status Review 
Tribunals and the Administrative Review Boards estab-
lished by direction of the Secretary of Defense that are 
in operation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for determining 
the status of the detainees held at Guantanamo Bay or 
to provide an annual review to determine the need to 
continue to detain an alien who is a detainee; and 
(B) the procedures in operation in Afghanistan and 
Iraq for a determination of the status of aliens detained 
in the custody or under the physical control of the Depart-
ment of Defense in those countries. 
(2) DESIGNATED CIVILIAN OFFICIAL.—The procedures sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) shall ensure 
that the official of the Department of Defense who is designated 
by the President or Secretary of Defense to be the final review 
authority within the Department of Defense with respect to 
decisions of any such tribunal or board (referred to as the 
‘‘Designated Civilian Official’’) shall be a civilian officer of the 
Department of Defense holding an office to which appointments 
are required by law to be made by the President, by and 
with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
(3) CONSIDERATION
OF
NEW
EVIDENCE.—The procedures 
submitted under paragraph (1)(A) shall provide for periodic 
review of any new evidence that may become available relating 
to the enemy combatant status of a detainee. 
(b) CONSIDERATION OF STATEMENTS DERIVED WITH COERCION.—
H. R. 1815—342
(1) ASSESSMENT.—The procedures submitted to Congress 
pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) shall ensure that a Combatant 
Status Review Tribunal or Administrative Review Board, or 
any similar or successor administrative tribunal or board, in 
making a determination of status or disposition of any detainee 
under such procedures, shall, to the extent practicable, assess—
(A) whether any statement derived from or relating 
to such detainee was obtained as a result of coercion; 
and 
(B) the probative value, if any, of any such statement. 
(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) applies with respect to 
any proceeding beginning on or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(c) REPORT ON MODIFICATION OF PROCEDURES.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the committees specified in subsection 
(a)(1) a report on any modification of the procedures submitted 
under subsection (a). Any such report shall be submitted not later 
than 60 days before the date on which such modification goes 
into effect. 
(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to Congress an annual report on the annual review 
process for aliens in the custody of the Department of Defense 
outside the United States. Each such report shall be submitted 
in unclassified form, with a classified annex, if necessary. The 
report shall be submitted not later than December 31 each 
year. 
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—Each such report shall include 
the following with respect to the year covered by the report: 
(A) The number of detainees whose status was 
reviewed. 
(B) The procedures used at each location. 
(e) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DETENTION OF ENEMY COMBATANTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2241 of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(e) Except as provided in section 1405 of the Detainee Treat-
ment Act of 2005, no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction 
to hear or consider—
‘‘(1) an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by 
or on behalf of an alien detained by the Department of Defense 
at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; or 
‘‘(2) any other action against the United States or its agents 
relating to any aspect of the detention by the Department 
of Defense of an alien at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who—
‘‘(A) is currently in military custody; or 
‘‘(B) has been determined by the United States Court 
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in accord-
ance with the procedures set forth in section 1405(e) of 
the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 to have been properly 
detained as an enemy combatant.’’. 
(2) REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW 
TRIBUNALS OF PROPRIETY OF DETENTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B), (C), 
and (D), the United States Court of Appeals for the District 
of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to 
determine the validity of any final decision of a Combatant
H. R. 1815—343
Status Review Tribunal that an alien is properly detained 
as an enemy combatant. 
(B) LIMITATION
ON
CLAIMS.—The jurisdiction of the 
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 
Circuit under this paragraph shall be limited to claims 
brought by or on behalf of an alien—
(i) who is, at the time a request for review by 
such court is filed, detained by the Department of 
Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and 
(ii) for whom a Combatant Status Review Tribunal 
has been conducted, pursuant to applicable procedures 
specified by the Secretary of Defense. 
(C) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—The jurisdiction of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 
on any claims with respect to an alien under this paragraph 
shall be limited to the consideration of—
(i) whether the status determination of the 
Combatant Status Review Tribunal with regard to such 
alien was consistent with the standards and procedures 
specified by the Secretary of Defense for Combatant 
Status Review Tribunals (including the requirement 
that the conclusion of the Tribunal be supported by 
a preponderance of the evidence and allowing a rebut-
table presumption in favor the Government’s evidence); 
and 
(ii) to the extent the Constitution and laws of 
the United States are applicable, whether the use of 
such standards and procedures to make the determina-
tion is consistent with the Constitution and laws of 
the United States. 
(D) TERMINATION
ON
RELEASE
FROM
CUSTODY.—The 
jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the 
District of Columbia Circuit with respect to the claims 
of an alien under this paragraph shall cease upon the 
release of such alien from the custody of the Department 
of Defense. 
(3) REVIEW
OF
FINAL
DECISIONS
OF
MILITARY
COMMIS-
SIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B), (C), 
and (D), the United States Court of Appeals for the District 
of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to 
determine the validity of any final decision rendered pursu-
ant to Military Commission Order No. 1, dated August 
31, 2005 (or any successor military order). 
(B) GRANT OF REVIEW.—Review under this paragraph—
(i) with respect to a capital case or a case in 
which the alien was sentenced to a term of imprison-
ment of 10 years or more, shall be as of right; or 
(ii) with respect to any other case, shall be at 
the discretion of the United States Court of Appeals 
for the District of Columbia Circuit. 
(C) LIMITATION ON APPEALS.—The jurisdiction of the 
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 
Circuit under this paragraph shall be limited to an appeal 
brought by or on behalf of an alien—
(i) who was, at the time of the proceedings pursu-
ant to the military order referred to in subparagraph
H. R. 1815—344
(A), detained by the Department of Defense at Guanta-
namo Bay, Cuba; and 
(ii) for whom a final decision has been rendered 
pursuant to such military order. 
(D) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—The jurisdiction of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 
on an appeal of a final decision with respect to an alien 
under this paragraph shall be limited to the consideration 
of—
(i) whether the final decision was consistent with 
the standards and procedures specified in the military 
order referred to in subparagraph (A); and 
(ii) to the extent the Constitution and laws of 
the United States are applicable, whether the use of 
such standards and procedures to reach the final deci-
sion is consistent with the Constitution and laws of 
the United States. 
(4) RESPONDENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall be the 
named respondent in any appeal to the United States Court 
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit under this 
subsection. 
(f) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to confer any constitutional right on an alien detained as an enemy 
combatant outside the United States. 
(g) UNITED STATES DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, 
the term ‘‘United States’’, when used in a geographic sense, is 
as defined in section 101(a)(38) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act and, in particular, does not include the United States Naval 
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
(h) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—This section shall take effect on the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) REVIEW OF COMBATANT STATUS TRIBUNAL AND MILITARY 
COMMISSION DECISIONS.—Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection 
(e) shall apply with respect to any claim whose review is 
governed by one of such paragraphs and that is pending on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 1406. TRAINING OF IRAQI SECURITY FORCES REGARDING TREAT-
MENT OF DETAINEES. 
(a) REQUIRED POLICIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 
policies designed to ensure that all military and civilian Depart-
ment of Defense personnel or contractor personnel of the 
Department of Defense responsible for the training of any unit 
of the Iraqi Security Forces provide training to such units 
regarding the international obligations and laws applicable to 
the humane treatment of detainees, including protections 
afforded under the Geneva Conventions and the Convention 
Against Torture. 
(2) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF TRAINING.—The Secretary shall 
ensure that, for all personnel of the Iraqi Security Forces who 
are provided training referred to in paragraph (1), there is 
documented acknowledgment that such training has been pro-
vided.
H. R. 1815—345
(3) DEADLINE FOR POLICIES TO BE PRESCRIBED.—The policies 
required by paragraph (1) shall be prescribed not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(b) ARMY FIELD MANUAL.—
(1) TRANSLATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide 
for the unclassified portions of the United States Army Field 
Manual on Intelligence Interrogation to be translated into 
Arabic and any other language the Secretary determines appro-
priate for use by members of the Iraqi security forces. 
(2) DISTRIBUTION.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide 
for such manual, as translated, to be distributed to all appro-
priate officials of the Iraqi Government, including, but not 
limited to, the Iraqi Minister of Defense, the Iraqi Minister 
of Interior, senior Iraqi military personnel, and appropriate 
members of the Iraqi Security Forces with a recommendation 
that the principles that underlay the manual be adopted by 
the Iraqis as the basis for their policies on interrogation of 
detainees. 
(c) TRANSMITTAL
TO CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—Not less 
than 30 days after the date on which policies are first prescribed 
under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives copies of such 
regulations, policies, or orders, together with a report on steps 
taken to the date of the report to implement this section. 
(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not less than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of 
the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House 
of Representatives a report on the implementation of this section. 
TITLE 
XV—AUTHORIZATION 
FOR 
IN-
CREASED COSTS DUE TO OPERATION 
IRAQI FREEDOM AND OPERATION EN-
DURING FREEDOM
Sec. 1501. Purpose. 
Sec. 1502. Army procurement. 
Sec. 1503. Navy and Marine Corps procurement. 
Sec. 1504. Air Force procurement. 
Sec. 1505. Defense-wide activities procurement. 
Sec. 1506. Research, development, test and evaluation. 
Sec. 1507. Operation and maintenance. 
Sec. 1508. Defense Working Capital Fund. 
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. 
Sec. 1510. Military personnel. 
Sec. 1511. Iraq Freedom Fund. 
Sec. 1512. Treatment as additional authorizations. 
Sec. 1513. Transfer authority. 
Sec. 1514. Availability of funds.
SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this title is to authorize emergency supplemental 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2006 
to provide funds for additional costs due to Operation Iraqi Freedom 
and Operation Enduring Freedom pursuant to section 402 of H. 
Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the 
budget for fiscal year 2006.
H. R. 1815—346
SEC. 1502. ARMY PROCUREMENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 2006 for procurement accounts of the Army 
in amounts as follows: 
(1) For aircraft, $40,600,000. 
(2) For ammunition, $109,500,000. 
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles, $485,499,000. 
(4) For other procurement, $1,659,800,000. 
(b) AVAILABILITY
OF
CERTAIN
AMOUNTS
FOR
UP-ARMORED 
WHEELED VEHICLES.—
(1) AVAILABILITY.—Of the amount authorized to be appro-
priated by subsection (a)(4), $240,000,000 shall be available 
for the procurement of up-armored high mobility multipurpose 
wheeled vehicles (UAHs), including vehicles in the M1114, 
M1151, and M1152 configurations. 
(2) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the Sec-
retary of the Army shall allocate the manner in which 
amounts available under paragraph (1) shall be available 
for purposes specified in that paragraph. 
(B) LIMITATION.—Amounts available under paragraph 
(1) may not be allocated under subparagraph (A) until 
the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense commit-
tees that the Army has a validated requirement for procure-
ment for a purpose specified in paragraph (1) based on 
a statement of urgent needs from a commander of a combat-
ant command. 
(C) REPORTS.—Not later than 15 days after an alloca-
tion of funds is made under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report describing such allocation of funds. 
(c) AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FOR TACTICAL WHEELED 
VEHICLE ARMORING PROGRAMS.—
(1) AVAILABILITY.—Of the amount authorized to be appro-
priated by subsection (a)(4), $150,000,000 shall be available 
for units deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as follows: 
(A) Procurement of up-armored Light Tactical Wheeled 
Vehicles (LTVs) or add-on armor kits for Light Tactical 
Wheeled Vehicles. 
(B) Procurement of add-on armor kits for Medium Tac-
tical Wheeled Vehicles (MTVs), including Low Signature 
Armored Cabs for the family of Medium Tactical Wheeled 
Vehicles. 
(C) Procurement of add-on armor kits for Heavy Tac-
tical Wheeled Vehicles (HTVs). 
(2) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—To the extent the Secretary 
of the Army determines that such amount is not needed for 
the procurement of such armored Tactical Wheeled Vehicles 
for units deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan under paragraph 
(1), the Secretary shall use the amounts remaining for the 
procurement of such armored vehicles in accordance with other 
priorities of the Army. 
SEC. 1503. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT. 
(a) NAVY.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal year 2006 for procurement accounts for the Navy in 
amounts as follows:
H. R. 1815—347
(1) For aircraft procurement, $15,000,000. 
(2) For weapons procurement, $56,700,000. 
(b) MARINE CORPS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 2006 for the procurement account for the 
Marine Corps in the amount of $644,400,000. 
(c) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2006 for the procure-
ment account for ammunition for the Navy and the Marine Corps 
in the amount of $147,921,000. 
(d) AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS.—
(1) AVAILABILITY.—Of the amount authorized to be appro-
priated by subsection (b), $200,000,000 shall be available for 
the procurement of up-armored high mobility multipurpose 
wheeled vehicles (UAHs), including vehicles in the M1114, 
M1151, and M1152 configurations. 
(2) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the Sec-
retary of the Navy shall allocate the manner in which 
amounts available under paragraph (1) shall be available 
for the purposes specified in that paragraph. 
(B) LIMITATION.—Amounts available under paragraph 
(1) may not be allocated under subparagraph (A) until 
the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense commit-
tees that the Marine Corps has a validated requirement 
for procurement for a purpose specified in paragraph (1) 
based on a statement of urgent needs from a commander 
of a combatant command. 
(C) REPORTS.—Not later than 15 days after an alloca-
tion of funds is made under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report describing such allocation of funds. 
SEC. 1504. AIR FORCE PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2006 for the aircraft procurement accounts for the Air Force in 
the amount of $214,000,000. 
SEC. 1505. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2006 for the procurement account for Defense-wide in the amount 
of $103,900,000. 
SEC. 1506. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2006 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, develop-
ment, test and evaluation as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $8,700,000. 
(2) For Defense-wide activities, $75,000,000. 
SEC. 1507. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2006 for the use of the Armed Forces for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $19,828,180,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $1,658,000,000. 
(3) For the Marine Corps, $1,588,250,000. 
(4) For the Air Force, $2,404,190,000. 
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $1,778,397,000.
H. R. 1815—348
(6) For the Army Reserve, $44,400,000. 
(7) For the Naval Reserve, $9,400,000. 
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $4,000,000. 
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $7,000,000. 
(10) For the Army National Guard, $196,300,000. 
(11) For the Air National Guard, $13,400,000. 
SEC. 1508. DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2006 for the Defense Working Capital Fund in the amount of 
$1,700,000,000. 
SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2006 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, the Defense Health Program, in the amount of 
$178,415,000 for operation and maintenance. 
SEC. 1510. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Defense for military personnel accounts for fiscal year 
2006 a total of $11,788,323,000. 
SEC. 1511. IRAQ FREEDOM FUND. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 2006 for the Iraq Freedom Fund in the 
amount of $5,240,725,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN AMOUNT.—Of the 
amount 
authorized 
to 
be 
appropriated 
by 
subsection 
(a), 
$1,000,000,000 shall be available only for support of activities of 
the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Task Force. 
(c) CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.—Of the amount authorized to be 
appropriated by subsection (a), $2,500,000,000 shall be available 
only for classified programs. 
(d) TRANSFER.—
(1) TRANSFER
AUTHORIZED.—Subject to paragraph (2), 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by subsection (a) may 
be transferred from the Iraq Freedom Fund to any accounts 
as follows: 
(A) Operation and maintenance accounts of the Armed 
Forces. 
(B) Military personnel accounts. 
(C) Research, development, test, and evaluation 
accounts of the Department of Defense. 
(D) Procurement accounts of the Department of 
Defense. 
(E) Accounts providing funding for classified programs. 
(F) The operating expenses account of the Coast Guard. 
(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—A transfer may not be made 
under the authority in paragraph (1) until five days after 
the date on which the Secretary of Defense notifies the congres-
sional defense committees in writing of the transfer. 
(3) TREATMENT OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—Amounts trans-
ferred to an account under the authority in paragraph (1) 
shall be merged with amounts in such account and shall be 
made available for the same purposes, and subject to the same 
conditions and limitations, as amounts in such account.
H. R. 1815—349
(4) EFFECT
ON
AUTHORIZATION
AMOUNTS.—A transfer of 
an amount to an account under the authority in paragraph 
(1) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for 
such account by an amount equal to the amount transferred. 
SEC. 1512. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 
by this Act. 
SEC. 1513. TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 
Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 
the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 
available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal 
year 2006 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 
(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 
transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 
same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that 
the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section 
may not exceed $2,500,000,000. The transfer authority provided 
in this section is in addition to any other transfer authority 
available to the Secretary of Defense. 
(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by this section to 
transfer authorizations—
(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 
have a higher priority than the items from which authority 
is transferred; 
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 
has been denied authorization by Congress; and 
(3) may not be combined with the authority under section 
1001. 
(c) EFFECT
ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made 
from one account to another under the authority of this section 
shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account 
to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the 
amount transferred. 
(d) NOTICE
TO CONGRESS.—A transfer may be made under 
the authority of this section only after the Secretary of Defense—
(1) consults with the chairmen and ranking members of 
the congressional defense committees with respect to the pro-
posed transfer; and 
(2) after such consultation, notifies those committees in 
writing of the proposed transfer not less than five days before 
the transfer is made. 
SEC. 1514. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. 
Funds in this title shall be made available for obligation to 
the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Defense-wide compo-
nents by the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2006.
H. R. 1815—350
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006’’. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project.
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
Army: Inside the United States
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .............
Anniston Army Depot ...................................
$3,150,000
Fort Rucker ....................................................
$9,700,000
Redstone Arsenal ..........................................
$25,100,000
Alaska ................
Fort Richardson .............................................
$4,700,000
Fort Wainwright ............................................
$44,660,000
Arizona ...............
Fort Huachuca ...............................................
$5,100,000
Yuma Proving Ground ..................................
$8,100,000
California ...........
Concord Naval Weapons Station .................
$11,850,000
Fort Irwin ......................................................
$21,250,000
Colorado .............
Fort Carson ....................................................
$72,822,000
Georgia ...............
Fort Benning .................................................
$30,261,000
Fort Gillem ....................................................
$3,900,000
Fort Gordon ...................................................
$4,550,000
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field ..........
$57,980,000
Hawaii ................
Pohakuloa Training Area .............................
$60,300,000
Schofield Barracks ........................................
$53,900,000
Illinois ................
Rock Island Arsenal ......................................
$7,400,000
Indiana ...............
Crane Army Ammunition Activity ...............
$5,700,000
Kansas ...............
Fort Riley .......................................................
$33,900,000
Kentucky ............
Fort Campbell ................................................
$116,475,000
Fort Knox .......................................................
$4,600,000
Louisiana ...........
Fort Polk ........................................................
$28,887,000
Missouri .............
Fort Leonard Wood .......................................
$23,500,000
New Jersey ........
Picatinny Arsenal ..........................................
$4,450,000
New York ...........
Fort Drum ......................................................
$73,350,000
United States Military Academy, West 
Point.
$7,500,000
North Carolina ..
Fort Bragg .....................................................
$301,250,000
Ohio ....................
Joint Systems Manufacturing Center, Lima 
$11,600,000
Oklahoma ...........
Fort Sill ..........................................................
$5,850,000
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant ............
$5,400,000
Pennsylvania .....
Letterkenny Depot ........................................
$6,300,000
H. R. 1815—351
Army: Inside the United States—Continued
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
South Carolina ..
Fort Jackson ..................................................
$1,600,000
Texas ..................
Fort Bliss .......................................................
$5,000,000
Fort Hood .......................................................
$64,488,000
Fort Sam Houston .........................................
$7,000,000
Utah ...................
Dugway Proving Ground ..............................
$25,000,000
Virginia ..............
Fort A.P. Hill .................................................
$2,700,000
Fort Belvoir ....................................................
$18,000,000
Fort Eustis .....................................................
$3,100,000
Fort Lee ..........................................................
$3,900,000
Fort Myer .......................................................
$15,200,000
Washington ........
Fort Lewis ......................................................
$99,949,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ....................
Grafenwoehr ..............................
$84,081,000
Italy ............................
Pisa .............................................
$5,254,000
Korea ..........................
Camp Humphreys .....................
$105,162,000
Yongpyong ..................................
$1,450,000
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(a)(3), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for unspecified installa-
tions or locations in the amount set forth in the following table:
Army: Unspecified Worldwide
Location 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Unspecified Worldwide ..............
$50,000,000
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire 
family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, 
and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
Army: Family Housing
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Alaska ................
Fort Richardson ..................
117 ....
$49,000,000
Fort Wainwright .................
180 ....
$91,000,000
H. R. 1815—352
Army: Family Housing—Continued
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Arizona ..............
Fort Huachuca ....................
131 ....
$31,000,000
Yuma Proving Ground .......
35 ......
$11,200,000
Oklahoma ..........
Fort Sill ...............................
129 ....
$24,000,000
Virginia .............
Fort Lee ..............................
96 ......
$19,500,000
Fort Monroe ........................
21 ......
$6,000,000
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural 
and engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $17,536,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $300,400,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2005, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Army 
in the total amount of $3,128,889,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(a), $1,111,522,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(b), $195,947,000. 
(3) For military construction projects at unspecified world-
wide locations authorized by section 2101(c), $50,000,000. 
(4) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$24,141,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$170,021,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $549,636,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United 
States Code), $803,993,000. 
(7) For the construction of increment 3 of the Lewis and 
Clark Instructional Facility at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, 
authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public 
Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697), $42,642,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 2 of a barracks com-
plex at Vilseck, Germany, authorized by section 2101(b) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
H. R. 1815—353
2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1698), as 
amended by section 2105 of this Act, $13,600,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of the Drum Road 
upgrade at Helemano Military Reservation, Hawaii, authorized 
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 
118 Stat. 2101), $41,000,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of a vehicle mainte-
nance facility at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, authorized by 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 
Stat. 2101), $24,656,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of a barracks 
complex, at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, authorized by section 
2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2101), $24,650,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 2 of trainee barracks, 
Basic Training Complex 1 at Fort Knox, Kentucky, authorized 
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 
118 Stat. 2101), $21,000,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 2 of a library and 
learning center at the United States Military Academy, West 
Point, New York, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division 
B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2101), $25,470,000. 
(14) For the construction of increment 2 of a barracks 
complex renewal project at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, author-
ized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–
375; 118 Stat. 2101), $30,611,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a). 
(2) $16,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex 
for Fort Drum, New York). 
(3) $31,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex 
for the 2nd Brigade at Fort Bragg, North Carolina). 
(4) $50,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex 
for the 3rd Brigade at Fort Bragg, North Carolina). 
(5) $77,400,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex 
for divisional artillery at Fort Bragg, North Carolina). 
(6) $13,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2101(a) for construction of a defense access road 
for Fort Belvoir, Virginia). 
(c) CONFORMING TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 2104(a)(8) 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 
(division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2103) is amended
H. R. 1815—354
by striking ‘‘Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 
116 Stat. 2681)’’ and inserting ‘‘Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of 
Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697)’’. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES PROJECT.—
The table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 
117 Stat. 1698) is amended—
(1) in the item relating to Vilseck, Germany, by striking 
‘‘$31,000,000’’ 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$26,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$226,900,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2104(b)(6) of that Act 
(117 Stat. 1700) is amended by striking ‘‘$18,900,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$13,900,000’’. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 
Sec. 2206. Modifications of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2005 projects.
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
Navy: Inside the United States
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ..................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma ..............
$3,637,000
California ..............
Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine 
Palms.
$24,000,000
Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pen-
dleton.
$1,400,000
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar .........
$5,070,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ......
$90,437,000
Naval Air Station, Lemoore ......................
$8,480,000
Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake ...
$19,158,000
Naval Postgraduate School .......................
$6,500,000
Connecticut ...........
Naval Submarine Base, New London ......
$4,610,000
Florida ...................
Diving&Salvage Training Center, Pan-
ama City.
$9,678,000
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville ................
$88,603,000
Naval Air Station, Pensacola ....................
$8,710,000
Naval Station, Mayport .............................
$15,220,000
Whiting Field .............................................
$4,670,000
Georgia ..................
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay ..........
$6,890,000
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany ......
$5,840,000
Hawaii ...................
Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay
$5,700,000
H. R. 1815—355
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Naval Base, Pearl Harbor .........................
$29,700,000
Illinois ...................
Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes 
$167,750,000
Indiana
Naval Warfare Center, Crane ...................
$8,220,000
Maine
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard .....................
$8,100,000
Maryland ...............
Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent 
River.
$5,800,000
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian 
Head.
$8,250,000
United States Naval Academy, Annapolis 
$51,720,000
Mississippi
Naval Air Station, Meridian .....................
$10,450,000
North Carolina .....
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point ..
$29,147,000
Marine Corps Air Station, New River ......
$6,840,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ..........
$44,590,000
Pennsylvania ........
Naval Station Weapons Center, Philadel-
phia.
$4,780,000
Rhode Island .........
Naval Station, Newport .............................
$15,490,000
South Carolina .....
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort .........
$1,480,000
Texas .....................
Naval Air Station, Kingsville ....................
$16,040,000
Virginia .................
Marine Corps Air Field, Quantico ............
$19,698,000
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ...................
$18,429,000
Naval Air Station, Oceana ........................
$11,680,000
Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek ......
$36,034,000
Naval Station, Norfolk ..............................
$32,245,000
Naval Support Activity, Norfolk Naval 
Shipyard.
$78,788,000
Naval Station Weapons Center, Dahlgren 
$9,960,000
Washington ...........
Naval Station, Everett ...............................
$70,950,000
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor ................
$60,160,000
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ..........
$4,010,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ...............................
Naval Base, Guam ...............................
$55,473,000
Japan ...............................
Naval Station, Yokosuka ....................
$83,010,000
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2204(a)(4)(A), the Secretary of the Navy 
may construct or acquire family housing units (including land 
acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installation, in the 
number of units, and in the amount set forth in the following 
table:
Navy: Family Housing
Location 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Guam .......................
Naval Base, Guam ......................
126 ......
$43,495,000
H. R. 1815—356
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2204(a)(4)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $178,644,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2005, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy 
in the total amount of $1,964,743,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2201(a), $837,411,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2201(b), $39,584,000. 
(3) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$34,893,000. 
(4) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $218,942,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $588,660,000. 
(5) For the construction of increment 3 of the general 
purpose berthing pier at Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New 
Jersey, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public 
Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1704), as amended by section 2205 
of this Act, $54,432,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 3 of pier 11 replace-
ment at Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, authorized by section 
2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 
1704), $40,200,000. 
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of the apron and 
hangar recapitalization at Naval Air Facility, El Centro, Cali-
fornia, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public 
Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105), $18,666,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 2 of the White Side 
complex, Marine Corps Air Facility, Quantico, Virginia, author-
ized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–
375; 118 Stat. 2105), $34,730,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of the limited area 
production and storage complex at Strategic Weapons Facility 
Pacific, Bangor, Washington, authorized by section 2201(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105), as 
amended by section 2206 of this Act, $47,095,000.
H. R. 1815—357
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of the lab consoli-
dation at Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific, Bangor, Wash-
ington authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public 
Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105), as amended by section 2206 
of this Act, $9,430,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of the presidential 
helicopter programs support facility at Naval Air Warfare 
Center, Patuxent River, Maryland, authorized by section 
2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2105), as amended by section 2206 of this Act, $40,700,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2201 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 
(2) $37,721,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for a reclamation and conveyance project 
for Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California). 
(3) $43,424,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for a helicopter hangar replacement at 
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida). 
(4) $45,850,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for infrastructure upgrades to Recruit 
Training Command, Great Lakes, Illinois). 
(5) $26,790,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for construction of a field house at United 
States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland). 
(6) $31,059,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for replacement of Ship Repair Pier 3 
at Naval Support Activity, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia). 
(7) $10,159,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for an addition to Hockmuth Hall, Marine 
Corps Base, Quantico, Virginia). 
(8) $21,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for construction of bachelor quarters for 
Naval Station, Everett, Washington). 
(9) $29,889,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(b) for wharf upgrades at Naval Base, 
Guam). 
(10) $69,100,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(b) for wharf upgrades at Naval Station, 
Yokosuka, Japan). 
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES PROJECT.—
The table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 
117 Stat. 1703) is amended—
(1) in the item relating to Naval Weapons Station, Earle, 
New Jersey, by striking ‘‘$123,720,000’’ in the amount column 
and inserting ‘‘$140,372,000’’; and
H. R. 1815—358
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,352,524,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2204(b)(4) of that Act 
(117 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking ‘‘$96,980,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$113,632,000’’. 
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATIONS OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECTS. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES PROJECTS.—
Section 2201 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2105) is amended—
(1) in the table in subsection (a)—
(A) below the item relating to Naval Surface Warfare 
Center, Indian Head, Maryland, by inserting ‘‘Naval Air 
Warfare Center, Patuxent River’’ in the installation column 
and ‘‘$95,200,000’’ in the amount column; 
(B) in the item relating to Marine Corps Air Facility, 
Quantico, Virginia, by striking ‘‘$73,838,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$74,470,000’’; 
(C) in the item relating to Strategic Weapons Facility 
Pacific, Bangor, Washington, by striking ‘‘$138,060,000’’ 
in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$147,760,000’’; and 
(D) by striking the amount identified as the total in 
the amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,057,587,000’’; and 
(2) by striking subsection (c). 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2204 of that Act (118 
Stat. 2107) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$712,927,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$752,927,000’’; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (3); and 
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘$34,098,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$34,730,000’’; and 
(B) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the fol-
lowing new paragraphs: 
‘‘(7) $9,700,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for naval laboratory consolidation, Stra-
tegic Weapons Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington). 
‘‘(8) $55,200,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for construction of a presidential heli-
copter programs support facility at Naval Air Warfare Center, 
Patuxent River, Maryland).’’. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations
H. R. 1815—359
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
Air Force: Inside the United States
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ....................
Maxwell Air Force Base ........................
$14,900,000
Alaska .......................
Clear Air Force Base .............................
$20,000,000
Elmendorf Air Force Base .....................
$84,820,000
Arizona ......................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .............
$8,600,000
Luke Air Force Base ..............................
$13,000,000
Arkansas ...................
Little Rock Air Force Base ....................
$8,900,000
California ..................
Beale Air Force Base .............................
$14,200,000
Edwards Air Force Base ........................
$103,000,000
Travis Air Force Base ............................
$46,400,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base ..................
$16,845,000
Colorado ....................
Buckley Air Force Base .........................
$20,100,000
Peterson Air Force Base ........................
$25,500,000
United States Air Force Academy ........
$13,000,000
Delaware ...................
Dover Air Force Base .............................
$19,000,000
District of Columbia
Bolling Air Force Base ...........................
$14,900,000
Florida .......................
Cape Canaveral ......................................
$6,200,000
Hurlburt Field ........................................
$2,540,000
MacDill Air Force Base .........................
$107,200,000
Tyndall Air Force Base ..........................
$21,500,000
Georgia ......................
Robins Air Force Base ...........................
$7,600,000
Hawaii .......................
Hickam Air Force Base ..........................
$13,378,000
Idaho .........................
Mountain Home Air Force Base ...........
$9,835,000
Louisiana ..................
Barksdale Air Force Base ......................
$10,800,000
Massachusetts ..........
Hanscom Air Force Base .......................
$3,900,000
Mississippi ................
Columbus Air Force Base ......................
$10,000,000
Keesler Air Force Base ..........................
$47,500,000
Missouri ....................
Whiteman Air Force Base .....................
$5,721,000
Montana ....................
Malmstrom Air Force Base ...................
$13,500,000
Nebraska ...................
Offutt Air Force Base ............................
$63,080,000
Nevada ......................
Indian Springs Auxiliary Field .............
$60,724,000
Nellis Air Force Base .............................
$24,370,000
New Jersey ...............
McGuire Air Force Base ........................
$13,185,000
New Mexico ..............
Kirtland Air Force Base ........................
$6,600,000
Holloman Air Force Base ......................
$15,000,000
North Dakota ............
Minot Air Force Base .............................
$8,700,000
Ohio ...........................
Wright Patterson Air Force Base .........
$32,620,000
Oklahoma ..................
Tinker Air Force Base ...........................
$31,960,000
Vance Air Force Base ............................
$14,000,000
South Carolina .........
Charleston Air Force Base ....................
$2,583,000
Shaw Air Force Base .............................
$16,030,000
South Dakota ............
Ellsworth Air Force Base ......................
$8,400,000
Texas .........................
Goodfellow Air Force Base ....................
$4,300,000
Laughlin Air Force Base .......................
$7,900,000
Sheppard Air Force Base .......................
$36,000,000
Utah ..........................
Hill Air Force Base ................................
$33,900,000
Virginia .....................
Langley Air Force Base .........................
$44,365,000
Washington ...............
Fairchild Air Force Base .......................
$8,200,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2304(a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
H. R. 1815—360
Air Force: Outside the United States
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany .......................
Ramstein Air Base .................................
$11,650,000
Spangdahlem Air Base ..........................
$12,474,000
Guam ............................
Andersen Air Base .................................
$18,500,000
Italy ...............................
Aviano Air Base ......................................
$22,660,000
Korea .............................
Kunsan Air Base ....................................
$47,900,000
Osan Air Base .........................................
$37,719,000
Portugal ........................
Lajes Field, Azores .................................
$12,000,000
Turkey ...........................
Incirlik Air Base .....................................
$5,780,000
United Kingdom ...........
Royal Air Force Lakenheath .................
$5,125,000
Royal Air Force Mildenhall ...................
$13,500,000
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2304(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct or 
acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and sup-
porting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number 
of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Family Housing
State or Country 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Alaska .................
Eielson Air Force Base .......
392 ..
$55,794,000
California ............
Edwards Air Force Base ....
226 ..
$59,699,000
Florida .................
MacDill Air Force Base ......
109 ..
$40,982,000
Idaho ...................
Mountain Home Air Force 
Base.
194 ..
$56,467,000
Missouri ..............
Whiteman Air Force Base
111 ..
$26,917,000
Montana ..............
Malmstrom Air Force Base 
296 ..
$68,971,000
North Carolina ...
Seymour Johnson Air Force 
Base.
255 ..
$48,868,000
North Dakota ......
Grand Forks Air Force 
Base.
150 ..
$43,353,000
Minot Air Force Base .........
223 ..
$44,548,000
South Carolina ...
Charleston Air Force Base
10 ....
$15,935,000
South Dakota ......
Ellsworth Air Force Base ...
60 ....
$14,383,000
Texas ...................
Dyess Air Force Base .........
190 ..
$43,016,000
Germany .............
Ramstein Air Base .............
101 ..
$62,952,000
Spangdahlem Air Base ......
79 ....
$45,385,000
Turkey .................
Incirlik Air Base .................
100 ..
$22,730,000
United Kingdom
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath.
107 ..
$48,437,000
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2304(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architec-
tural and engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $37,104,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2304(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force
H. R. 1815—361
may improve existing military family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $366,346,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2005, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Air 
Force in the total amount of $3,157,356,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2301(a), $989,756,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2301(b), $187,308,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$15,929,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$95,537,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $1,101,887,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $766,939,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2301 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 
(2) $30,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2301(a) for construction of a C–17 maintenance 
complex at Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska). 
(3) $66,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2301(a) for construction of a main base runway 
at Edwards Air Force Base, California). 
(4) $29,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2301(a) for construction of a joint intelligence 
center at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida). 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2403(a)(1), the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following tables:
H. R. 1815—362
Defense Education Activity
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Georgia ............
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field ..
$16,629,000
North Carolina 
Fort Bragg .............................................
$18,075,000
Defense Intelligence Agency
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
District of Columbia ..
Bolling Air Force Base ..............
$7,900,000
Defense Logistics Agency
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ..................
Yuma Proving Ground ...................................
$7,300,000
California ..............
Defense Distribution Depot, Tracy ...............
$33,635,000
Miramar ..........................................................
$23,000,000
Kansas ...................
McConnell Air Force Base .............................
$15,800,000
New Mexico ..........
Cannon Air Force Base ..................................
$13,200,000
North Carolina .....
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base .................
$18,500,000
Pennsylvania ........
Defense Distribution Depot, New Cum-
berland.
$6,500,000
Virginia .................
Fort Belvoir ....................................................
$4,500,000
Naval Station, Norfolk ...................................
$6,700,000
National Security Agency
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Georgia .......................
Augusta ......................................
$61,466,000
Hawaii ........................
Kunia ..........................................
$305,000,000
Maryland ...................
Fort Meade .................................
$41,200,000
Special Operations Command
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ..............
Naval Surface Warfare Center, 
Coronado.
$28,350,000
Florida ...................
Hurlburt Field ................................
$6,500,000
Eglin Air Force Base ......................
$12,800,000
Georgia ..................
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air 
Field.
$10,000,000
Kentucky ...............
Fort Campbell ................................
$37,800,000
North Carolina ......
Fort Bragg ......................................
$18,069,000
Washington ...........
Fort Lewis ......................................
$53,300,000
TRICARE Management Activity
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ....
Beale Air Force Base ................................
$18,000,000
H. R. 1815—363
TRICARE Management Activity—Continued
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Naval Hospital, San Diego .......................
$15,000,000
Colorado ......
Peterson Air Force Base ...........................
$1,820,000
Maryland ....
Fort Detrick ...............................................
$55,200,000
Uniformed 
Services 
University, 
Be-
thesda.
$10,350,000
Mississippi ..
Keesler Air Force Base .............................
$14,000,000
Nevada ........
Nellis Air Force Base ................................
$1,700,000
South Caro-
lina.
Charleston .................................................
$35,000,000
Texas ...........
Lackland Air Force Base ..........................
$11,000,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2403(a)(2), the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property 
and carry out military construction projects for the installations 
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following tables:
Defense Education Activity
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany .........
Landstuhl ..............................................
$6,543,000
Vilseck ...................................................
$2,323,000
Guam ..............
Agana .....................................................
$40,578,000
Korea ...............
Taegu .....................................................
$8,231,000
Spain ...............
Naval Station, Rota ..............................
$7,963,000
Defense Logistics Agency
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Greece ...................
Souda Bay .......................................................
$7,089,000
Missile Defense Agency
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Kwajalein ...................
Kwajalein Atoll ..........................
$4,901,000
National Security Agency
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
United Kingdom ........
Menwith Hill ..............................
$86,354,000
H. R. 1815—364
TRICARE Management Activity
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain ......................
.....................................................
$4,750,000
SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2403(a)(5), the Secretary of Defense may 
carry out energy conservation projects under section 2865 of title 
10, United States Code, in the amount of $50,000,000. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2005, for 
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military 
departments) in the total amount of $2,817,039,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(a), $626,609,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(b), $123,104,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $15,736,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$136,406,000. 
(5) For energy conservation projects authorized by section 
2402 of this Act, $50,000,000. 
(6) For base closure and realignment activities as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such 
Act, $254,827,000. 
(7) For base closure and realignment activities as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A of 
such Act, $1,504,466,000. 
(8) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $46,391,000. 
(B) For credit to the Department of Defense Family 
Housing 
Improvement 
Fund 
established 
by 
section 
2883(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, $2,500,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of the hospital 
replacement at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2112), $57,000,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
H. R. 1815—365
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
2401 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 
(2) $12,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) for construction of a regional security 
operations center, Augusta, Georgia). 
(3) $256,034,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) for replacement of a regional security 
operations center, Kunia, Hawaii). 
(4) $13,151,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(a) for construction of a classified material 
conversion facility, Fort Meade, Maryland). 
(5) $44,657,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2401(b) for construction of an operations building, 
Royal Air Force Menwith Hill Station, United Kingdom). 
(c) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO OBLIGATION 
OF FUNDS
FOR BASE CLOSURE
AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES.—
Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in subsection (a)(7) may not be obligated until—
(1) a period of 21 days has expired following the date 
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report describing the specific programs, 
projects, and activities for which the funds are to be obligated; 
or 
(2) if over sooner, a period of 14 days has expired following 
the date on which a copy of the report is provided in an 
electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of title 10, United 
States Code. 
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 
ORGANIZATION 
SECURITY 
INVEST-
MENT PROGRAM
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program as pro-
vided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 
not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 
for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 
previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2005, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States 
Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects 
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
program authorized by section 2501, in the amount of $206,858,000.