datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
IIB 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3085 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 15, 2014 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, 
as the ‘‘Captain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office 
Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:47 Jul 16, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3085.RFS
H3085
jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 3085 RFS
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HERBERT JOHNSON MEMORIAL POST 
OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chi-
cago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cap-
tain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Herbert 
Johnson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:47 Jul 16, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3085.RFS
H3085
jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1804
AN ACT
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse lo-
cated at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,
Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at
South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the United
States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives December 5,
1995.
Attest:
Clerk.
II 
Calendar No. 589 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3085 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 15, 2014 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
NOVEMBER 13, 2014 
Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, 
as the ‘‘Captain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office 
Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HERBERT JOHNSON MEMORIAL POST 
OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chi-
cago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cap-
tain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3085.RS
H3085
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Herbert 
Johnson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3085.RS
H3085
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3085.RS
H3085
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 589 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3085 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 3349 West 111th Street in 
Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Captain Herbert John-
son Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
NOVEMBER 13, 2014 
Reported without amendment 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H3085.RS
H3085
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at
South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the United
States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
H. R. 1804
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six
An Act
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 6th and
Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South
6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, shall be known
and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,
or other record of the United States to the United States Post
Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be
a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1804
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South
6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac
C. Parker Federal Building’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 8, 1995
Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse lo-
cated at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,
Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at
South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the United
States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
Æ
scribing the United States strategy to endorse and obtain 
observer status for Taiwan in INTERPOL and at other 
related meetings, activities, and mechanisms thereafter. 
The report shall include the following: 
(1) A description of the efforts the President 
has made to encourage INTERPOL member states 
to promote Taiwan’s bid to obtain observer status in 
INTERPOL. 
(2) A description of the actions the President 
will take to endorse and obtain observer status for 
Taiwan in INTERPOL and at other related meet-
ings, activities, and mechanisms thereafter. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:28 Apr 28, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1853.IH
H1853
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
standards of judicial review that apply to the review of
agency findings under the statute granting the agency au-
thority to conduct the rulemaking.
‘‘§ 625. Petition for cost-benefit analysis
‘‘(a)(1) Any person subject to a major rule may peti-
tion the relevant agency or the President to perform a
cost-benefit analysis under this subchapter for the major
rule, including a major rule in effect on the date of enact-
ment of this subchapter for which a cost-benefit analysis
pursuant to such subchapter has not been performed, re-
gardless of whether a cost-benefit analysis was previously
performed to meet requirements imposed before the date
of enactment of this subchapter.
‘‘(2) The petition shall identify with reasonable speci-
ficity the major rule to be reviewed.
‘‘(3) The agency or the President shall grant the peti-
tion if the petition shows that there is a reasonable likeli-
hood that the costs of the major rule outweigh the bene-
fits, or that reasonable questions exist as to whether the
rule provides greater net benefits to society than any rea-
sonable alternative to the rule that may be more clearly
resolved through examination pursuant to this subchapter
and subchapter III.
‘‘(4) A decision to grant or deny a petition under this
subsection shall be made not later than 180 days after
submittal. A decision to deny a petition shall be subject
to judicial review immediately upon denial as final agency
action under the statute granting the agency authority to
conduct the rulemaking.
‘‘(b) For each major rule for which a petition has
been granted under subsection (a), the agency shall con-
duct a cost-benefit analysis in accordance with this sub-
chapter, and shall determine whether the rule satisfies the
decisional criteria set forth in section 623. If the rule does
not satisfy the decisional criteria, then the agency shall
take immediate action to either revoke or amend the rule
to conform the rule to the requirements of this subchapter
and the decisional criteria under section 623.
‘‘(c) For purposes of this section, the term ‘major
rule’ means any major rule or portion thereof.
‘‘(d)(1) Any person may petition the relevant agency
to withdraw, as contrary to this subchapter, any agency
guidance or general statement of policy that would be a
major rule if the guidance or general statement of policy
had been adopted as a rule.
‘‘(2) The petition shall identify with reasonable speci-
ficity why the guidance or general statement of policy
would be major if adopted as a rule.
‘‘(3) The agency shall grant the petition if the peti-
tion shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 
Tax Freedom Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 
TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 
TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 
Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 
striking ‘‘ during the period beginning November 1, 2003, 
and ending November 1, 2014’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2014. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3086 
AN ACT 
To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom 
Act.
IIA
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1804
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
DECEMBER 6, 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works
AN ACT
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse lo-
cated at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,
Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at
South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the United
States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives December 5,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3086 
To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 
Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. 
CHABOT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 
Tax Freedom Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 
TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 
TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 
Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:30 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3086.IH
H3086
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
806 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .................................
March Air Force Base ...........................................
$11,086,000 
Missouri ....................................
Kansas City ............................................................
$15,020,000 
Tennessee ..................................
Memphis ..................................................................
$4,330,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table:
IB
House Calendar No. 139
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1804
[Report No. 104–367]
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South
6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac
C. Parker Federal Building’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 8, 1995
Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
NOVEMBER 28, 1995
Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse lo-
cated at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,
Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
House Calendar No. 139
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1804
[Report No. 104–367]
A BILL
To designate the United States Post Office-Court-
house located at South 6th and Rogers Avenue,
Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
NOVEMBER 28, 1995
Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
printed
II 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3086 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 16, 2014 
Received 
AN ACT 
To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:47 Dec 17, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3086.RDS
H3086
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 3086 RDS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 
Tax Freedom Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 
TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 
TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 
Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 
striking ‘‘ during the period beginning November 1, 2003, 
and ending November 1, 2014’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2014. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:47 Dec 17, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3086.RDS
H3086
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
II
Calendar No. 356
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1804
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
DECEMBER 6, 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works
MARCH 28, 1996
Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment
AN ACT
To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse lo-
cated at South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith,
Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal
Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at
South 6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas,
HR 1804 RS
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the United
States Post Office-Courthouse referred to in section 1
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives December 5,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
Calendar No. 356
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1804
AN ACT
To designate the United States Post Office-Court-
house located at South 6th and Rogers Avenue,
Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge Isaac C.
Parker Federal Building’’.
MARCH 28, 1996
Reported without amendment
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3087 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the receipt of bonuses 
by Department of Veterans Affairs employees who violate Federal civil 
laws or regulations, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 
Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 
A BILL 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the re-
ceipt of bonuses by Department of Veterans Affairs em-
ployees who violate Federal civil laws or regulations, 
and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs Em-
ployee Accountability Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:31 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3087.IH
H3087
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON BONUSES FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
VETERANS AFFAIRS EMPLOYEES WHO VIO-
LATE FEDERAL CIVIL LAWS OR REGULA-
TIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section: 
‘‘SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON BONUSES. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The Secretary shall ensure 
that no employee of the Department who, during any year, 
knowingly violates any law, regulation, or policy described 
in paragraph (2) receives a bonus for or during that year. 
‘‘(2) A law, regulation, or policy described in this 
paragraph is any of the following: 
‘‘(A) A Federal civil law or Federal regulation, 
including such civil laws or regulations covered 
under the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the 
Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation. 
‘‘(B) An internal policy of the Department. 
‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall annually 
certify to Congress that each bonus awarded by the Sec-
retary during the previous year was awarded in accord-
ance with subsection (a)(1). 
‘‘(c) BONUS DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, 
the term ‘bonus’ includes— 
‘‘(1) a retention incentive; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:31 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3087.IH
H3087
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) a retention incentive payment; 
‘‘(3) a retention incentive award; and 
‘‘(4) any other incentive requiring approval 
from the Central Office Human Resource Service, 
the Chief Business Office Workforce Management, 
or the Corporate Senior Executive Management Of-
fice.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 
at the end the following new item: 
‘‘713. Limitation on bonuses’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:31 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3087.IH
H3087
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(i) Any recipient, and any employee of a recipient,
who has given in-person unsolicited advice to a
nonattorney that such nonattorney should obtain counsel
or take legal action shall not accept employment resulting
from that advice, or refer that nonattorney to another re-
cipient or employee of a recipient, except that—
‘‘(1) an attorney may accept employment by a
close friend, relative, former client (if the advice
given is germane to the previous employment by the
client), or person whom the attorney reasonably be-
lieves to be a client because the attorney is currently
handling an active legal matter or case for that spe-
cific person;
‘‘(2) an attorney may accept employment that
results from the attorney’s participation in activities
designed to educate nonattorneys to recognize legal
problems, to make intelligent selection of counsel, or
to utilize available legal services if such activities are
conducted or sponsored by a qualified legal assist-
ance organization;
‘‘(3) without affecting that attorney’s right to
accept employment, an attorney may speak publicly
or write for publication on legal topics so long as
such attorney does not emphasize the attorney’s own
professional experience or reputation and does not
HR 1976 RS
former spouse as defined under section 8901 of such
title; and
(B) for coverage effective on and after September
30, 1995.
(2) An individual who, on September 30, 1995, is enti-
tled to continued coverage under a health benefits plan ad-
ministered by the Farm Credit Administration—
(A) shall be deemed to be entitled to continued
coverage under section 8905a of title 5, United States
Code, for the same period that would have been per-
mitted under the plan administered by the Farm
Credit Administration; and
(B) may enroll in an approved health benefits
plan described under sections 8903 or 8903a of such
title in accordance with section 8905A of such title for
coverage effective on and after September 30, 1995.
(3) An individual who, on September 30, 1995, is cov-
ered as an unmarried dependent child under a health bene-
fits plan administered by the Farm Credit Administration
and who is not a member of family as defined under section
8901(5) of title 5, United States Code—
(A) shall be deemed to be entitled to continued
coverage under section 8905a of such title as though
the individual had, on September 30, 1995, ceased to
meet the requirements for being considered an unmar-