HR 1 RFS
‘‘(4) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS.—Amounts in 
the Fund shall be available until expended for the 
research, development, purchase, deployment, and 
installation of equipment to improve the ability of 
security screening personnel at screening check-
points to detect explosives.’’. 
SEC. 404. STRENGTHENING EXPLOSIVE DETECTION AT AIR-
PORT SCREENING CHECKPOINTS. 
Not later than 7 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security 
(Transportation Security Administration) shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees the strategic 
plan described in the section amended by section 4013(a) 
of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act 
of 2004 (118 Stat. 3719). 
SEC. 405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF AVIATION SE-
CURITY FUNDING. 
Section 48301(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘and 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2006, 
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011’’. 
SEC. 406. INSPECTION OF CARGO CARRIED ABOARD PAS-
SENGER AIRCRAFT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 44901 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as 
subsections (h) and (i), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(g) AIR CARGO ON PASSENGER AIRCRAFT.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years 
after the date of enactment of the Implementing the 
9/11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish a 
system to inspect 100 percent of cargo transported 
on passenger aircraft operated by an air carrier or 
foreign air carrier in air transportation or intrastate 
air transportation to ensure the security of all such 
passenger aircraft carrying cargo. 
‘‘(2) MINIMUM
STANDARDS.—The system re-
ferred to in paragraph (1) shall require, at a min-
imum, that equipment, technology, procedures, and 
personnel are used to inspect cargo carried on pas-
senger aircraft to provide a level of security equiva-
lent to the level of security for the inspection of pas-
senger checked baggage as follows: 
‘‘(A) 35 percent of such cargo is so in-
spected by the end of fiscal year 2007. 
‘‘(B) 65 percent of such cargo is so in-
spected by the end of fiscal year 2008. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(C) 100 percent of such cargo is so in-
spected by the end of fiscal year 2009. 
‘‘(3) REGULATIONS.— 
‘‘(A) INTERIM
FINAL
RULE.—The Sec-
retary of Homeland Security may issue an in-
terim final rule as a temporary regulation to 
implement this subsection without regard to the 
provisions of chapter 5 of title 5. 
‘‘(B) FINAL RULE.— 
‘‘(i) IN
GENERAL.—If the Secretary 
issues an interim final rule under subpara-
graph (A), the Secretary shall issue, not 
later than one year after the effective date 
of the interim final rule, a final rule as a 
permanent regulation to implement this 
subsection in accordance with the provi-
sions of chapter 5 of title 5. 
‘‘(ii) FAILURE TO ACT.—If the Sec-
retary does not issue a final rule in accord-
ance with clause (i) on or before the last 
day of the 1-year period referred to in 
clause (i), the interim final rule issued 
under subparagraph (A) shall not be effec-
tive after the last day of such period. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(iii) 
SUPERCEDING
OF
INTERIM 
FINAL RULE.—The final rule issued in ac-
cordance with this subparagraph shall su-
persede the interim final rule issued under 
subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(4) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 
date of establishment of the system under paragraph 
(1), the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a re-
port that describes the system.’’. 
(b) ASSESSMENT OF EXEMPTIONS.— 
(1) TSA ASSESSMENT OF EXEMPTIONS.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 120 
days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub-
mit to the appropriate committees of Congress 
and to the Comptroller General a report regard-
ing an assessment of each exemption granted 
for inspection of air cargo and an analysis to 
assess the risk of maintaining such exemption. 
(B) CONTENTS.—The report referred to in 
subparagraph (A) shall include— 
(i) the rationale for each exemption; 
(ii) what percentage of cargo is not 
screened as a result of each exemption; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(iii) the impact of each exemption on 
aviation security; 
(iv) the projected impact on the flow 
of commerce of eliminating each exemp-
tion, respectively, should the Secretary 
choose to take such action; and 
(v) plans and rationale for maintain-
ing, changing, or eliminating each exemp-
tion. 
(2) GAO ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 120 
days after the date on which the report under para-
graph (1) is submitted, the Comptroller General 
shall review the report and provide to Congress an 
assessment of the methodology of determinations 
made by the Secretary for maintaining, changing, or 
eliminating an exemption. 
SEC. 407. APPEAL AND REDRESS PROCESS FOR PAS-
SENGERS WRONGLY DELAYED OR PROHIB-
ITED FROM BOARDING A FLIGHT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle C of title IV of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 231 et. seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘SEC. 432. APPEAL AND REDRESS PROCESS FOR PAS-
SENGERS WRONGLY DELAYED OR PROHIB-
ITED FROM BOARDING A FLIGHT. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a 
timely and fair process for individuals who believe they 
have been delayed or prohibited from boarding a commer-
cial aircraft because they were wrongly identified as a 
threat under the regimes utilized by the Transportation 
Security Administration, the Bureau of Customs and Bor-
der Protection, or any other Department entity. 
‘‘(b) OFFICE OF APPEALS AND REDRESS.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish an Office of Appeals and Redress to oversee 
the process established by the Secretary pursuant to 
subsection (a). 
‘‘(2) RECORDS.—The process established by the 
Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) shall include 
the establishment of a method by which the Office 
of Appeals and Redress, under the direction of the 
Secretary, will be able to maintain a record of air 
carrier passengers and other individuals who have 
been misidentified and have corrected erroneous in-
formation. 
‘‘(3) 
INFORMATION.—To 
prevent 
repeated 
delays of a misidentified passenger or other indi-
vidual, the Office of Appeals and Redress shall— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(A) ensure that the records maintained 
under this subsection contain information deter-
mined by the Secretary to authenticate the 
identity of such a passenger or individual; and 
‘‘(B) furnish to the Transportation Secu-
rity Administration, the Bureau of Customs 
and Border Protection, or any other appro-
priate Department entity, upon request, such 
information as may be necessary to allow such 
agencies to assist air carriers in improving their 
administration of the advanced passenger 
prescreening system and reduce the number of 
false positives. 
‘‘(4) INITIATION
OF
APPEAL
AND
REDRESS 
PROCESS AT AIRPORTS.—The Office of Appeals and 
Redress shall establish at each airport at which the 
Department has a significant presence a process to 
allow air carrier passengers to begin the appeals 
process established pursuant to subsection (a) at the 
airport.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 430 the following: 
‘‘Sec. 432. Appeal and redress process for passengers wrongly delayed or pro-
hibited from boarding a flight.’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
SEC. 408. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 
(a) ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN PERSONNEL MANAGE-
MENT AUTHORITIES.—Effective 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act— 
(1) section 111(d) of the Aviation and Trans-
portation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note) is re-
pealed and any authority of the Secretary of Home-
land Security derived from such section 111(d) shall 
terminate; 
(2) any personnel management system, to the 
extent established or modified pursuant to such sec-
tion 111(d) (including by the Secretary through the 
exercise of any authority derived from such section 
111(d)) shall terminate; and 
(3) the Secretary shall ensure that all TSA em-
ployees are subject to the same personnel manage-
ment system as described in subsection (e)(1) or 
(e)(2). 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN UNIFORMITY RE-
QUIREMENTS.— 
(1) SYSTEM UNDER SUBSECTION (e)(1).—The 
Secretary shall, with respect to any personnel man-
agement system described in subsection (e)(1), take 
any measures which may be necessary to provide for 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
the uniform treatment of all TSA employees under 
such system. 
(2) SYSTEM UNDER SUBSECTION (e)(1).—Sec-
tion 9701(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para-
graph (4); 
(B) by striking the period at the end of 
paragraph (5) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(6) provide for the uniform treatment of all 
TSA employees (as defined in section 408(d) of the 
Implementing the 9/11 Commission Recommenda-
tions Act of 2007).’’. 
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(A) PROVISIONS RELATING TO A SYSTEM 
UNDER
SUBSECTION
(e)(1).—Any measures 
necessary to carry out paragraph (1) shall take 
effect 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(B) PROVISIONS RELATING TO A SYSTEM 
UNDER
SUBSECTION
(e)(2).—Any measures 
necessary to carry out the amendments made 
by paragraph (2) shall take effect 90 days after 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
the date of the enactment of this Act or, if 
later, the commencement date of the system in-
volved. 
(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—Not later than 6 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Government Accountability Office shall submit 
to the Committee on Homeland Security of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
Senate a report on— 
(A) the pay system that applies with re-
spect to TSA employees as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act; and 
(B) any changes to such system which 
would be made under any regulations which 
have been prescribed under chapter 97 of title 
5, United States Code. 
(2) MATTERS FOR INCLUSION.—The report re-
quired under paragraph (1) shall include— 
(A) a brief description of each pay system 
described in paragraphs (1)(A) and (1)(B), re-
spectively; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(B) a comparison of the relative advan-
tages and disadvantages of each of those pay 
systems; and 
(C) such other matters as the Government 
Accountability Office considers appropriate. 
(d) TSA EMPLOYEE DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘TSA employee’’ means an individual who holds— 
(1) any position which was transferred (or the 
incumbent of which was transferred) from the 
Transportation Security Administration of the De-
partment of Transportation to the Department of 
Homeland Security by section 403 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 203); or 
(2) any other position within the Department of 
Homeland Security the duties and responsibilities of 
which include carrying out one or more of the func-
tions that were transferred from the Transportation 
Security Administration of the Department of 
Transportation to the Secretary by such section. 
(e) 
PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
DE-
SCRIBED.—A personnel management system described in 
this subsection is— 
(1) any personnel management system, to the 
extent that it applies with respect to any TSA em-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
ployees by virtue of section 114(n) of title 49, 
United States Code; and 
(2) any human resources management system, 
established under chapter 97 of title 5, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 409. STRATEGIC PLAN TO TEST AND IMPLEMENT AD-
VANCED PASSENGER PRESCREENING SYS-
TEM. 
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact-
ment of the Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
submit to Congress a plan that— 
(1) describes the system to be utilized for the 
Department of Homeland Security to assume the 
performance of comparing passenger information, as 
defined by the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Se-
curity (Transportation Security Administration), to 
the automatic selectee and no fly lists, utilizing ap-
propriate records in the consolidated and integrated 
terrorist watchlist maintained by the Federal Gov-
ernment; 
(2) provides a projected timeline for each phase 
of testing and implementation of the system; 
(3) explains how the system will be integrated 
with the prescreening system for passenger on inter-
national flights; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(4) describes how the system complies with sec-
tion 552a of title 5, United States Code. 
TITLE V—STRENGTHENING THE 
SECURITY OF CARGO CON-
TAINERS 
SEC. 501. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ENTRY OF CON-
TAINERS INTO THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) REQUIREMENTS.—Section 70116 of title 46, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ENTRY OF CON-
TAINERS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A container may enter the 
United States, either directly or via a foreign port, 
only if— 
‘‘(A) the container is scanned with equip-
ment that meets the standards established pur-
suant to paragraph (2)(A) and a copy of the 
scan is provided to the Secretary; and 
‘‘(B) the container is secured with a seal 
that meets the standards established pursuant 
to paragraph (2)(B), before the container is 
loaded on the vessel for shipment to the United 
States. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(2) STANDARDS
FOR
SCANNING
EQUIPMENT 
AND SEALS.— 
‘‘(A) SCANNING
EQUIPMENT.—The Sec-
retary shall establish standards for scanning 
equipment required to be used under paragraph 
(1)(A) to ensure that such equipment uses the 
best-available technology, including technology 
to scan a container for radiation and density 
and, if appropriate, for atomic elements. 
‘‘(B) SEALS.—The Secretary shall estab-
lish standards for seals required to be used 
under paragraph (1)(B) to ensure that such 
seals use the best-available technology, includ-
ing technology to detect any breach into a con-
tainer and identify the time of such breach. 
‘‘(C) REVIEW
AND
REVISION.—The Sec-
retary shall— 
‘‘(i) review and, if necessary, revise 
the standards established pursuant to sub-
paragraphs (A) and (B) not less than once 
every two years; and 
‘‘(ii) ensure that any such revised 
standards require the use of technology, as 
soon as such technology becomes available, 
to— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(I) identify the place of a 
breach into a container; 
‘‘(II) notify the Secretary of such 
breach before the container enters the 
Exclusive Economic Zone of the 
United States; and 
‘‘(III) track the time and location 
of the container during transit to the 
United States, including by truck, 
rail, or vessel. 
‘‘(D) DEFINITION.—In subparagraph (C), 
the term ‘Exclusive Economic Zone of the 
United States’ has the meaning given the term 
‘Exclusive Economic Zone’ in section 2101(10a) 
of this title.’’. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 
70116(c) of title 46, United States Code, as added by sub-
section (a) of this section, such sums as may be necessary 
for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2013. 
(c) REGULATIONS; APPLICATION.— 
(1) REGULATIONS.— 
(A) INTERIM
FINAL
RULE.—Consistent 
with the results of and lessons derived from the 
pilot system implemented under section 231 of 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
the SAFE Port Act (Public Law 109–347), the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue an 
interim final rule as a temporary regulation to 
implement section 70116(c) of title 46, United 
States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this 
section, not later than 180 days after the date 
of the submission of the report under section 
231 of the SAFE Port Act, without regard to 
the provisions of chapter 5 of title 5, United 
States Code. 
(B) FINAL
RULE.—The Secretary shall 
issue a final rule as a permanent regulation to 
implement section 70116(c) of title 46, United 
States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this 
section, not later than one year after the date 
of the submission of the report under section 
231 of the SAFE Port Act, in accordance with 
the provisions of chapter 5 of title 5, United 
States Code. The final rule issued pursuant to 
that rulemaking may supersede the interim 
final rule issued pursuant to subparagraph (A). 
(2) PHASED-IN APPLICATION.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The requirements of 
section 70116(c) of title 46, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
apply with respect to any container entering the 
United States, either directly or via a foreign 
port, beginning on— 
(i) the end of the 3-year period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in the case of a container loaded on 
a vessel destined for the United States in 
a country in which more than 75,000 
twenty-foot equivalent units of containers 
were loaded on vessels for shipping to the 
United States in 2005; and 
(ii) the end of the 5-year period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in the case of a container loaded on 
a vessel destined for the United States in 
any other country. 
(B) EXTENSION.—The Secretary may ex-
tend by up to one year the period under clause 
(i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A) for containers 
loaded in a port, if the Secretary— 
(i) finds that the scanning equipment 
required under section 70116(c) of title 46, 
United States Code, as added by sub-
section (a) of this section, is not available 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
for purchase and installation in the port; 
and 
(ii) at least 60 days prior to issuing 
such extension, transmits such finding to 
the appropriate congressional committees. 
(d) INTERNATIONAL
CARGO
SECURITY
STAND-
ARDS.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary 
of State, is encouraged to promote and establish inter-
national standards for the security of containers moving 
through the international supply chain with foreign gov-
ernments and international organizations, including the 
International Maritime Organization and the World Cus-
toms Organization. 
(e) INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND OTHER OBLIGA-
TIONS.—In carrying out section 70116(c) of title 46, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this 
section, the Secretary shall consult with appropriate Fed-
eral departments and agencies and private sector stake-
holders to ensure that actions under such section do not 
violate international trade obligations or other inter-
national obligations of the United States. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
TITLE VI—STRENGTHENING EF-
FORTS 
TO 
PREVENT 
TER-
RORIST TRAVEL 
Subtitle A—Human Smuggling and 
Trafficking Center Improvements 
SEC. 601. STRENGTHENING THE CAPABILITIES OF THE 
HUMAN SMUGGLING AND TRAFFICKING CEN-
TER. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through the 
Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for United 
States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall pro-
vide to the Human Smuggling and Trafficking Center (in 
this section referred to as the ‘‘Center’’) the administra-
tive support and funding required for its maintenance, in-
cluding funding for personnel, leasing of office space, sup-
plies, equipment, technology, training, and travel expenses 
necessary for the Center to carry out its mission. 
(b) STAFFING OF THE CENTER.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Funding provided under 
subsection (a) shall be used for the hiring of for not 
fewer than 30 full-time equivalent staff for the Cen-
ter, to include the following: 
(A) One Director. 
(B) One Deputy Director for Smuggling. 
(C) One Deputy Director for Trafficking. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(D) One Deputy Director for Terrorist 
Travel. 
(E) Not fewer than 15 intelligence analysts 
or Special Agents, to include the following: 
(i) Not fewer than ten such analysts 
or Agents shall be intelligence analysts or 
law enforcement agents who shall be de-
tailed from entities within the Department 
of Homeland Security with human smug-
gling and trafficking related responsibil-
ities, as determined by the Secretary. 
(ii) Not fewer than one full time pro-
fessional staff detailee from each of the 
United States Coast Guard, United States 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 
United States Customs and Border Protec-
tion, Transportation Security Administra-
tion, and the Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis. 
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Intelligence analysts or 
Special Agents detailed to the Center under para-
graph (1)(E) shall have at least three years experi-
ence related to human smuggling or human traf-
ficking. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(3) DURATION
OF
ASSIGNMENT.—An intel-
ligence analyst or Special Agent detailed to the Cen-
ter under paragraph (1)(E) shall be detailed for a 
period of not less than two years. 
(c) FUNDING REIMBURSEMENT.—In operating the 
Center, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall act in 
accordance with all applicable requirements of the Econ-
omy Act (31 U.S.C. 1535), and shall seek reimbursement 
from the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, in 
such amount or proportion as is appropriate, for costs as-
sociated with the participation of the Department of Jus-
tice and the Department of State in the operation of the 
Center. 
(d) DEVELOPMENT
OF PLAN.—The Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall develop a plan for the Center 
that— 
(1) defines the roles and responsibilities of each 
Department participating in the Center; 
(2) describes how the Department of Homeland 
Security shall utilize its resources to ensure that the 
Center uses intelligence to focus and drive its ef-
forts; 
(3) describes the mechanism for the sharing of 
information from United States Immigration and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
Customs Enforcement and United States Customs 
and Border Protection field offices to the Center; 
(4) describes the mechanism for the sharing of 
homeland security information from the Center to 
the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, including 
how such sharing shall be consistent with section 
1016(b) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458); 
(5) establishes reciprocal security clearance sta-
tus to other participating agencies in the Center in 
order to ensure full access to necessary databases; 
(6) establishes or consolidates networked sys-
tems for the Center; and 
(7) ensures that the assignment of personnel to 
the Center from agencies of the Department of 
Homeland Security is incorporated into the civil 
service career path of such personnel. 
(e) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—The Sec-
retary of Homeland Security shall execute with the Attor-
ney General a Memorandum of Understanding in order 
to clarify cooperation and coordination between United 
States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the 
Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding issues related 
to human smuggling, human trafficking, and terrorist 
travel. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(f) COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF INTEL-
LIGENCE AND ANALYSIS.—The Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis, in coordination with the Center, shall submit to 
Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement and other 
relevant agencies periodic reports regarding terrorist 
threats related to human smuggling, human trafficking, 
and terrorist travel. 
Subtitle B—International Collabo-
ration 
to 
Prevent 
Terrorist 
Travel 
SEC. 611. REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION 
TO INCREASE BORDER SECURITY, ENHANCE 
GLOBAL 
DOCUMENT 
SECURITY, 
AND 
EX-
CHANGE TERRORIST INFORMATION. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in con-
junction with the Director of National Intelligence and the 
heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agen-
cies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional commit-
tees a report on efforts of the Government of the United 
States to collaborate with international partners and allies 
of the United States to increase border security, enhance 
global document security, and exchange terrorist informa-
tion. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(b) CONTENTS.—The report required by subsection 
(a) shall outline— 
(1) all presidential directives, programs, and 
strategies for carrying out and increasing United 
States Government efforts described in subsection 
(a); 
(2) the goals and objectives of each of these ef-
forts; 
(3) the progress made in each of these efforts; 
and 
(4) the projected timelines for each of these ef-
forts to become fully functional and effective. 
(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘appro-
priate congressional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the 
Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on 
the Judiciary, and the Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Se-
lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
Subtitle C—Biometric Border 
Entry and Exit System 
SEC. 621. SUBMITTAL OF PLAN ON BIOMETRIC ENTRY AND 
EXIT VERIFICATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTA-
TION. 
Not later than 7 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary for Homeland Security shall 
submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and the 
Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs and the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary of the Senate the plan developed 
by the Secretary under section 7208(c) of the Intelligence 
Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 
1365b(c)(2)) to accelerate the full implementation of an 
automated biometric entry and exit data system. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
TITLE VII—IMPROVING INTEL-
LIGENCE AND INFORMATION 
SHARING WITH LOCAL LAW 
ENFORCEMENT 
AND 
FIRST 
RESPONDERS 
Subtitle A—Fusion and Law En-
forcement 
Education 
and 
Teaming (FLEET) Grant Pro-
gram 
SEC. 701. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) The intelligence component of a State, local, 
or regional fusion center (in this title referred to 
generally as ‘‘fusion centers’’) focuses on the intel-
ligence process, in which information is collected, in-
tegrated, evaluated, analyzed, and disseminated. The 
Federal Government and nontraditional sources of 
intelligence information—such as public safety enti-
ties at the State, local, and tribal levels, and private 
sector organizations—all possess valuable informa-
tion that when ‘‘fused’’ with law enforcement data 
and properly analyzed at fusion centers can provide 
law enforcement officers with specific and actionable 
intelligence about terrorist and related criminal ac-
tivity. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(2) Participation by local and tribal law en-
forcement officers and intelligence analysts in fusion 
centers helps secure the homeland by involving such 
officers and analysts in the intelligence process on a 
daily basis, by helping them build professional rela-
tionships across every level and discipline of govern-
ment and the private sector, and by ensuring that 
intelligence and other information, including threat 
assessment, public safety, law enforcement, public 
health, social service, and public works, is shared 
throughout and among relevant communities. Such 
local and tribal participation in fusion centers sup-
ports the efforts of all law enforcement agencies and 
departments to anticipate, identify, monitor, and 
prevent terrorist and related criminal activity. 
(3) Some local and tribal law enforcement agen-
cies and departments, however, lack resources to 
participate fully in fusion centers. 
(4) Needs-based grant funding will maximize 
the participation of local and tribal law enforcement 
agencies and departments in fusion centers by re-
ducing the costs associated with detailing officers 
and intelligence analysts to fusion centers. Con-
sequently, such grant funding will not only promote 
the development of more effective, resourceful, and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
situationally aware fusion centers, but will also ad-
vance the cause of homeland security. 
SEC. 702. FLEET GRANT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 is further amended by adding 
at the end the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 203. FLEET GRANT PROGRAM. 
‘‘(a) IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN
AND
ESTABLISH-
MENT.— 
‘‘(1) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 
90 days after the date of the enactment of the Im-
plementing the 9/11 Commission Recommendations 
Act of 2007, the Secretary shall develop a Fusion 
and Law Enforcement Education and Teaming 
Grant Program (in this section referred to as the 
‘FLEET Grant program’) implementation plan and 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees 
a copy of such plan. In developing such plan, the 
Secretary shall consult with the Attorney General, 
the Bureau of Justice Assistance, and the Office of 
Community Oriented Policing of the Department of 
Justice and shall encourage the participation of fu-
sion centers and local and tribal law enforcement 
agencies and departments in the development of 
such plan. Such plan shall include— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(A) a clear articulation of the purposes, 
goals, and specific objectives for which the pro-
gram is being developed; 
‘‘(B) an identification of program stake-
holders and an assessment of their interests in 
and expectations for the program; 
‘‘(C) a developed set of quantitative 
metrics to measure, to the extent possible, pro-
gram output; and 
‘‘(D) a developed set of qualitative instru-
ments (e.g., surveys and expert interviews) to 
assess the extent to which stakeholders believe 
their needs and expectations are being met by 
the program. 
‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 
days after the enactment of the Implementing the 9/ 
11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007, the 
Secretary shall implement and carry out a FLEET 
Grant program under which the Secretary, in con-
sultation with the Attorney General, shall make 
grants to local and tribal law enforcement agencies 
and departments specified by the Secretary, in con-
sultation with the Attorney General, for the pur-
poses described in subsection (b). Subject to sub-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
section (g), each such grant shall be made for a two- 
year period. 
‘‘(b) USE OF GRANT AMOUNTS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A grant made to a local or 
tribal law enforcement agency or department under 
subsection (a) shall be used to enable such agency 
or department to detail eligible law enforcement per-
sonnel to participate in a fusion center that serves 
the geographic area in which such agency or depart-
ment is located, and may be used for the following 
purposes: 
‘‘(A) To hire new personnel, or to pay ex-
isting personnel, to perform the duties of eligi-
ble law enforcement personnel who are detailed 
to a fusion center during the absence of such 
detailed personnel. 
‘‘(B) To provide appropriate training, as 
determined and required by the Secretary, in 
consultation with the Attorney General, for eli-
gible law enforcement personnel who are de-
tailed to a fusion center. 
‘‘(C) 
To 
establish 
communications 
connectivity between eligible law enforcement 
personnel who are detailed to a fusion center 
and the home agency or department of such 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
personnel in accordance with all applicable laws 
and regulations. 
‘‘(2) MANDATORY
PRIVACY
AND
CIVIL
LIB-
ERTIES TRAINING.—All eligible law enforcement per-
sonnel detailed to a fusion center under the FLEET 
Grant Program shall undergo appropriate privacy 
and civil liberties training that is developed, sup-
ported, or sponsored by the Privacy Officer and the 
Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in part-
nership with the Privacy and Civil Liberties Over-
sight Board. 
‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—A local or tribal law en-
forcement agency or department participating in the 
FLEET Grant program shall continue to provide a 
salary and benefits to any eligible law enforcement 
personnel detailed to a fusion center, in the same 
amounts and under the same conditions that such 
agency or department provides a salary and benefits 
to such personnel when not detailed to a fusion cen-
ter. None of the funds provided by the FLEET 
grant program may be used to carry out this para-
graph. 
‘‘(4) 
ELIGIBLE
LAW
ENFORCEMENT
PER-
SONNEL
DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, 
the term ‘eligible law enforcement personnel’ means 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
any local or tribal law enforcement officer or intel-
ligence analyst who meets each eligibility require-
ment specified by the Secretary. Such eligibility re-
quirements shall include a requirement that the offi-
cer or analyst has at least two years of experience 
as a law enforcement officer or intelligence analyst 
with the local or tribal law enforcement agency or 
department selected to participate in the FLEET 
Grant program. 
‘‘(c) APPLICATIONS.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—No grant may be made 
under subsection (a) unless an application for such 
grant has been submitted to, and approved by, the 
Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General. 
Such an application shall be submitted in such form, 
manner, and time, and shall contain such informa-
tion, as the Secretary, in consultation with the At-
torney General, may prescribe by regulation or 
guidelines. 
‘‘(2) JOINT APPLICATIONS.—A local or tribal 
law enforcement agency or department may file a 
joint grant application to detail eligible law enforce-
ment personnel to a fusion center. Such application 
shall be— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(A) for a single detailed officer or intel-
ligence analyst, who shall be detailed to work at 
a fusion center on a full-time basis; or 
‘‘(B) in the case of participating local and 
tribal law enforcement agencies or departments 
for which a detail arrangement described in 
subparagraph (A) is likely to result in hardship 
due to a staffing shortage (as determined by 
the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney 
General), for several eligible law enforcement 
personnel from multiple local or tribal law en-
forcement agencies or departments in the same 
geographic area, who shall be detailed to a fu-
sion center, each on a part-time basis, as part 
of a shared detail arrangement, as long as— 
‘‘(i) any hours worked by a detailed 
officer or analyst at a fusion center in a 
shared detail arrangement shall be counted 
toward the hourly shift obligations of such 
officer or analyst at his or her local or 
tribal law enforcement agency or depart-
ment; and 
‘‘(ii) no detailed officer or analyst 
working at a fusion center in a shared de-
tail arrangement shall be required to regu-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
larly work more hours than the officer or 
analyst would otherwise work if the officer 
or analyst was not participating in the 
shared detail arrangement. 
‘‘(d) DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS.—In considering ap-
plications for grants under subsection (a), the Secretary, 
in consultation with the Attorney General, shall ensure 
that, to the extent practicable— 
‘‘(1) entities that receive such grants are rep-
resentative of a broad cross-section of local and trib-
al law enforcement agencies and departments; 
‘‘(2) an appropriate geographic distribution of 
grants is made among urban, suburban, and rural 
communities; and 
‘‘(3) such grants are awarded based on consid-
eration of any assessments of risk by the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security. 
‘‘(e) PRIORITY.—The Secretary, in consultation with 
the Attorney General, shall issue regulations regarding the 
use of a sliding scale based on financial need to ensure 
that a local or tribal law enforcement agency or depart-
ment that is eligible to receive a grant under subsection 
(a) and that demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Sec-
retary, in consultation with the Attorney General, that it 
is in financial need (as determined by the Secretary, in 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
consultation with the Attorney General) receives priority 
in receiving funds under this section. 
‘‘(f) MATCHING FUNDS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 
the portion of the costs of a program, project, or ac-
tivity funded by a grant made to an entity under 
subsection (a) may not exceed 80 percent. 
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary, in consulta-
tion with the Attorney General, may waive, wholly or 
in part, the requirement under paragraph (1) of a 
non-Federal contribution to the costs of a program, 
project, or activity if the entity receiving the grant 
for such program, project, or activity can dem-
onstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary, in con-
sultation with the Attorney General, that it would be 
a hardship for such entity to satisfy such require-
ment. 
‘‘(g) RENEWAL OF GRANTS.—A grant made to a local 
or tribal law enforcement agency or department under 
subsection (a) may be renewed on an annual basis for an 
additional year after the first two-year period during 
which the entity receives its initial grant, if— 
‘‘(1) the entity can demonstrate to the satisfac-
tion of the Secretary, in consultation with the Attor-
ney General, significant progress in achieving the 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
objectives of the application for the initial grant in-
volved; and 
‘‘(2) such renewal would not prevent another 
local or tribal law enforcement agency or department 
that has applied for a grant under subsection (a), 
has not previously received such a grant, and that 
would otherwise qualify for such a grant, from re-
ceiving such a grant, as determined by the Sec-
retary, in consultation with the Attorney General. 
‘‘(h) REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF FUNDING.— 
If the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney Gen-
eral, determines that a grant recipient under this section 
is not in substantial compliance with the terms and re-
quirements of an approved grant application submitted 
under subsection (c), the Secretary, in consultation with 
the Attorney General, may revoke or suspend funding of 
that grant, in whole or in part. In the case of a revocation 
or suspension of funds under this subsection based on a 
determination of fraud, waste, or abuse, with respect to 
a grant recipient, such grant recipient shall be required 
to refund the grant funds received under subsection (a) 
that are related to such fraud, waste, or abuse, respec-
tively. 
‘‘(i) REPORTS.— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(1) REPORTS TO SECRETARY.—Each local or 
tribal law enforcement agency or department that 
receives a grant under subsection (a) shall submit to 
the Secretary and the Attorney General a report for 
each year such agency or department is a recipient 
of such grant. Each such report shall include a de-
scription and evaluation of each program, project, or 
activity funded by such grant. 
‘‘(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—One year after 
the date of the implementation of the FLEET grant 
program, and biannually thereafter, the Secretary, 
in consultation with the Attorney General, shall sub-
mit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
report describing the implementation and progress 
of the FLEET Grant Program. Each such report 
shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) A list of the local and tribal law en-
forcement agencies and departments receiving 
grants. 
‘‘(B) Information on the grant amounts 
awarded to each such agency or department. 
‘‘(C) 
Information 
on 
the 
programs, 
projects, and activities for which the grant 
funds are used. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(D) An evaluation of the effectiveness of 
the FLEET Grant program with respect to the 
cause of advancing homeland security, includ-
ing— 
‘‘(i) concrete examples of enhanced in-
formation sharing and a description of any 
preventative law enforcement actions taken 
based on such information sharing; 
‘‘(ii) an evaluation of the effectiveness 
of the detail arrangements with FLEET 
Grant program grant recipients; 
‘‘(iii) an evaluation of how the 
FLEET Grant program benefits the fusion 
centers; 
‘‘(iv) a description of how individual 
law enforcement officers and intelligence 
analysts detailed to the fusion centers ben-
efit from the detail experience; and 
‘‘(v) an evaluation of how the detail of 
the law enforcement officers and intel-
ligence analysts assists the fusion centers 
in learning more about criminal or ter-
rorist organizations operating within their 
areas of operation, including a description 
of any homeland security information re-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
quirements that were developed, or any 
homeland security information gaps that 
were filled, as a result of the detail ar-
rangement. 
‘‘(E) An analysis of any areas of need, 
with respect to the advancement of homeland 
security, that could be addressed through addi-
tional funding or other legislative action. 
‘‘(j) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEYS.—The Sec-
retary, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall 
create a mechanism for State, local, and tribal law en-
forcement officers and intelligence analysts who partici-
pate in the FLEET Grant program to fill out an electronic 
customer satisfaction survey, on an appropriate periodic 
basis, to assess the effectiveness of the FLEET Grant pro-
gram with respect to improving information sharing. The 
results of these voluntary surveys shall be provided elec-
tronically to appropriate personnel at the Office of Grants 
and Training of the Department and at the Bureau of 
Justice Assistance and the Office of Community Oriented 
Policing of the Department of Justice. The results of these 
customer satisfaction surveys shall also be included in an 
appropriate format in the reports described in subsection 
(i). 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(k) CONTINUATION ASSESSMENT.—Five years after 
the date of the implementation of the FLEET Grant pro-
gram, the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney 
General, shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
committees a FLEET Grant program continuation assess-
ment. Such continuation assessment shall— 
‘‘(1) recommend whether Congress should con-
tinue to authorize and fund the FLEET Grant pro-
gram (as authorized under this section or with pro-
posed changes), and provide the reasoning for such 
recommendation; and 
‘‘(2) if the Secretary recommends the continu-
ation of the FLEET Grant program— 
‘‘(A) recommend any changes to the pro-
gram which the Secretary, in consultation with 
the Attorney General, has identified as nec-
essary to improve the program, and the reasons 
for any such changes; 
‘‘(B) list and describe legislative priorities 
for Congress relating to the continuation of the 
program; and 
‘‘(C) provide recommendations for the 
amounts of funding that should be appropriated 
for the continuation of the program in future 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
fiscal years, including justifications for such 
amounts. 
‘‘(l) GENERAL REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Sec-
retary, in consultation with the Attorney General, may 
promulgate regulations and guidelines to carry out this 
section. 
‘‘(m) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this sec-
tion: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘local law enforcement agency or 
department’ means a local municipal police depart-
ment or a county sheriff’s office in communities 
where there is no police department. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘tribal law enforcement agency 
or department’ means the police force of an Indian 
tribe (as such term is defined in section 4 of the In-
dian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 
Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)) established and maintained 
by such a tribe pursuant to the tribe’s powers of 
self-government to carry out law enforcement.’’. 
(b) DEFINITION OF FUSION CENTER.—Section 2 of 
such Act is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(17) The terms ‘State, local, or regional fusion 
center’ and ‘fusion center’ mean a State intelligence 
center or a regional intelligence center that is the 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
product of a collaborative effort of at least two 
qualifying agencies that provide resources, expertise, 
or information to such center with the goal of maxi-
mizing the ability of such intelligence center and the 
qualifying agencies participating in such intelligence 
center to provide and produce homeland security in-
formation required to detect, prevent, apprehend, 
and respond to terrorist and criminal activity. For 
purposes of the preceding sentence, qualifying agen-
cies include— 
‘‘(A) State, local, and tribal law enforce-
ment authorities, and homeland and public 
safety agencies; 
‘‘(B) State, local, and tribal entities re-
sponsible for the protection of public health and 
infrastructure; 
‘‘(C) private sector owners of critical infra-
structure, as defined in section 1016(e) of the 
Uniting and Strengthening America by Pro-
viding Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept 
and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 
Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)); 
‘‘(D) Federal law enforcement and home-
land security entities; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(E) other appropriate entities specified by 
the Secretary.’’. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 202 the following: 
‘‘Sec. 203. FLEET Grant Program.’’. 
Subtitle B—Border Intelligence 
Fusion Center Program 
SEC. 711. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) The United States has 216 airports, 143 
seaports, and 115 official land border crossings that 
are official ports of entry. Screening all the people 
and goods coming through these busy ports is an 
enormous resource challenge for the men and women 
of the Department of Homeland Security (‘‘Depart-
ment’’) . 
(2) Department personnel, including personnel 
from the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 
(‘‘CBP’’) and U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement (‘‘ICE’’), cannot be everywhere at all 
times to ensure that terrorists, weapons of mass de-
struction, and other related contraband are not 
being smuggled across the border in order to sup-
port attacks against the United States. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
(3) State, local, and tribal law enforcement per-
sonnel are uniquely situated to help secure the bor-
der areas in their respective jurisdictions by serving 
as ‘‘force multipliers’’. To do so, however, law en-
forcement officers need access to available border in-
telligence developed by the Department. Such access 
shall help State, local, and tribal law enforcement 
personnel deploy their resources most effectively to 
detect and interdict terrorists, weapons of mass de-
struction, and related contraband at United States 
borders. 
(4) The Department has not yet developed a 
single, easily accessible, and widely available system 
to consistently share border intelligence and other 
information with its State, local, and tribal law en-
forcement partners. It likewise has failed to establish 
a process by which State, local, and tribal law en-
forcement personnel can consistently share with the 
Department information that they obtain that is rel-
evant to border security. 
(5) As a result, State, local, and tribal law en-
forcement personnel serving jurisdictions along the 
northern and southern borders typically depend 
upon personal relationships with CBP and ICE per-
sonnel in their respective jurisdictions to get the in-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
formation they need. While personal relationships 
have helped in some locales, they have not in others. 
This has led to an inconsistent sharing of border in-
telligence from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 
(6) State, local, and regional fusion centers 
(‘‘fusion centers’’) may help improve this situation. 
(7) In the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sep-
tember 11, 2001, numerous State, local, and tribal 
authorities responsible for the protection of the pub-
lic and critical infrastructure established fusion cen-
ters to help prevent terrorist attacks while at the 
same time preparing to respond to and recover from 
a terrorist attack should one occur. 
(8) Most border States have some variation of 
a fusion center. 
(9) In general, while the Federal Government 
has helped to establish fusion centers through the 
Department’s grants, a substantial percentage of the 
financial burden to support ongoing fusion center 
operations is borne by States and localities. 
(10) The Department, and in particular, the 
Department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis, 
has undertaken a program through which it sends 
such office’s personnel to fusion centers to establish 
a Department presence at those centers. In so doing, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
the hope is that such personnel will serve as a point 
of contact for information being shared at fusion 
centers by State, local, and tribal law enforcement 
personnel. Personnel at fusion centers hopefully will 
also act as a channel for information being shared 
by the Department itself. 
(11) Border State, local, and tribal law enforce-
ment officers anticipate that fusion centers will be a 
critical source of border intelligence from the De-
partment. While the Department’s border intel-
ligence products generated in the District of Colum-
bia and disseminated to fusion centers will undoubt-
edly be helpful, a far richer source of border intel-
ligence will likely come from CBP and ICE per-
sonnel working locally in border jurisdictions them-
selves. 
(12) Establishing a CBP and ICE presence at 
border State fusion centers will help ensure the most 
consistent, timely, and relevant flow of border intel-
ligence to and from the Department and State, local, 
and tribal law enforcement in border communities. 
Border State fusion centers thus could serve as a 
tool to build upon the personal relationships and in-
formation sharing that exists in some, but not all, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
jurisdictions between CBP, ICE, and State, local, 
and tribal law enforcement. 
SEC. 712. ESTABLISHMENT OF BORDER INTELLIGENCE FU-
SION CENTER PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is further 
amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 204. BORDER INTELLIGENCE FUSION CENTER PRO-
GRAM. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the 
Department the Border Intelligence Fusion Center 
Program, to be administered by the Under Secretary 
for Intelligence and Analysis, for the purpose of sta-
tioning Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 
and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of-
ficers or intelligence analysts in the fusion centers of 
participating border States. 
‘‘(2) NEW HIRES.—Funding provided under the 
Border Intelligence Fusion Center Program shall be 
available to hire new CBP and ICE officers or intel-
ligence analysts to replace CBP and ICE officers or 
intelligence analysts who are stationed at border 
State fusion centers under this section. 
‘‘(b) PARTICIPATION.— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may develop 
qualifying criteria for a border state fusion center’s 
participation in the Border Intelligence Fusion Cen-
ter Program. 
‘‘(2) CRITERIA.—Such criteria may include the 
following: 
‘‘(A) Whether the center focuses on a 
broad counterterrorism and counter-criminal 
approach, and whether that broad approach is 
pervasive through all levels of the organization. 
‘‘(B) Whether the center has sufficient 
numbers of adequately trained personnel to 
support a broad counterterrorism and counter- 
criminal mission. 
‘‘(C) Whether the center has access to rel-
evant law enforcement, private sector, open 
source, and national security data, as well as 
the ability to share and analytically exploit such 
data for actionable ends in accordance with all 
applicable laws and regulations. 
‘‘(D) The entity or entities providing finan-
cial support for the center’s funding. 
‘‘(E) Whether the center’s leadership is 
committed to the fusion center’s mission, and 
how the leadership sees the center’s role in ter-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
HR 1 RFS
rorism prevention, mitigation, response, and re-
covery. 
‘‘(c) ASSIGNMENT.—Wherever possible, not fewer 
than one CBP officer or intelligence analyst and one ICE 
officer or intelligence analyst shall be stationed at each 
participating border State fusion center. 
‘‘(d) PREREQUISITE.— 
‘‘(1) PRIOR WORK EXPERIENCE IN AREA.—To 
be stationed at a border State fusion center under 
this section, a CBP or ICE officer shall have served 
as a CBP or ICE officer in the State in which the 
fusion center where such officer shall be stationed is 
located for not less than two years before such as-
signment in order to ensure that such officer is fa-
miliar with the geography and people living in bor-
der communities, as well as the State, local, and 
tribal law enforcement agencies serving those com-
munities. 
‘‘(2) INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS, PRIVACY, AND 
CIVIL LIBERTIES TRAINING.—Before being stationed 
at a border State fusion center under this section, 
a CBP or ICE officer shall undergo— 
‘‘(A) 
appropriate 
intelligence 
analysis 
training via an intelligence-led policing cur-
riculum that is consistent with the standards 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
100 
HR 1 RFS
and recommendations of the National Criminal 
Intelligence Sharing Plan, the Department of 
Justice and Department Fusion Center Guide-
lines, title 28, part 23, Code of Federal Regula-
tions, as well as any other training prescribed 
by the Under Secretary for Intelligence and 
Analysis; and 
‘‘(B) appropriate privacy and civil liberties 
training that is developed, supported, or spon-
sored by the Privacy Officer and the Officer for 
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in partnership 
with the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight 
Board. 
‘‘(3) EXPEDITED SECURITY CLEARANCE PROC-
ESSING.—The Under Secretary for Intelligence and 
Analysis shall ensure that security clearance proc-
essing is expedited for each CBP and ICE officer or 
intelligence analyst stationed at border State fusion 
centers under this section and shall ensure that such 
officer or analyst has the appropriate clearance to 
conduct the work of the Border Intelligence Fusion 
Center Program. 
‘‘(4) FURTHER
QUALIFICATIONS.—Each CBP 
and ICE officer or intelligence analyst stationed at 
a border State fusion center under this section shall 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
101 
HR 1 RFS
satisfy any other qualifications the Under Secretary 
for Intelligence and Analysis may prescribe. 
‘‘(e) RESPONSIBILITIES.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 
‘‘(A) CREATION
AND
DISSEMINATION
OF 
BORDER INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTS.—CBP and 
ICE officers and intelligence analysts assigned 
to border State fusion centers under this sec-
tion will help State, local, and tribal law en-
forcement in jurisdictions along the northern 
and southern borders, and border State fusion 
center staff, overlay threat and suspicious activ-
ity with Federal homeland security information 
in order to develop a more comprehensive and 
accurate threat picture. Such CBP and ICE of-
ficers and intelligence analysts accordingly shall 
have as their primary mission the review of bor-
der security-relevant information from State, 
local, and tribal law enforcement sources, and 
the creation of border intelligence products de-
rived from such information and other border- 
security relevant information provided by the 
Department, and the dissemination of such 
products to border State, local, and tribal law 
enforcement. CBP and ICE officers or intel-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
102 
HR 1 RFS
ligence analysts assigned to border State fusion 
centers under this section shall also provide 
such products to the Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis of the Department for collection and 
dissemination to other fusion centers in other 
border States. 
‘‘(B) DATABASE ACCESS.—In order to ful-
fill the objectives described in subparagraph 
(A), CBP and ICE officers and intelligence an-
alysts stationed at border State fusion centers 
under this section shall have direct access to all 
relevant databases at their respective agencies. 
‘‘(C) 
CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
SUR-
VEYS.—The Secretary shall create a mechanism 
for State, local, and tribal law enforcement offi-
cers who are consumers of the intelligence prod-
ucts described in subparagraph (A) to fill out 
an electronic customer satisfaction survey when-
ever they access such a product. The results of 
these voluntary surveys should be provided elec-
tronically to appropriate personnel of the De-
partment. The results of these customer satis-
faction surveys should also be included in an 
appropriate format in the annual status reports 
described in subsection (h)(2)(A). 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
103 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(2) CULTIVATION OF RELATIONSHIPS.—CBP 
and ICE officers and intelligence analysts stationed 
at border State fusion centers under this section 
shall actively cultivate relationships with State, local, 
and tribal law enforcement personnel in border com-
munities in order to satisfy the mission described in 
paragraph (1), and shall make similar outreach to 
Canadian and Mexican law enforcement authorities 
serving neighboring communities across the northern 
and southern borders. CBP and ICE officers and in-
telligence analysts stationed at border State fusion 
centers under this section may also serve as a con-
duit of border intelligence products from the Depart-
ment itself and shall ensure that such products are 
provided to all appropriate law enforcement agen-
cies, departments, and offices in border States. 
‘‘(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec-
tion shall be construed to require a border State fusion 
center to participate in the Border Intelligence Fusion 
Center Program. 
‘‘(g) REPORTS.— 
‘‘(1) 
DEVELOPMENT
OF
IMPLEMENTATION 
PLAN.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of the Im-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
104 
HR 1 RFS
plementing the 9/11 Commission Recommenda-
tions Act of 2007, the Secretary shall develop 
a Border Intelligence Fusion Center Program 
implementation plan and submit to the appro-
priate congressional committees a copy of such 
plan. In developing such plan, the Secretary 
shall consult with State, local, and tribal au-
thorities responsible for border State fusion 
centers. 
‘‘(B) 
CONTENTS.—The 
implementation 
plan should also address the following elements 
for effective program assessment: 
‘‘(i) A clear articulation of the pur-
poses, goals, and specific objectives for 
which the program is being developed. 
‘‘(ii) An identification of program 
stakeholders and an assessment of their in-
terests in and expectations of the program. 
‘‘(iii) A developed set of quantitative 
metrics to measure, to the extent possible, 
program output. 
‘‘(iv) A developed set of qualitative in-
struments (e.g., surveys and expert inter-
views) to assess the extent to which stake-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
105 
HR 1 RFS
holders believe their needs and expecta-
tions are being met. 
‘‘(2) STATUS REPORTS AND CONTINUATION AS-
SESSMENT.— 
‘‘(A) STATUS REPORTS.— 
‘‘(i) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary 
shall submit to the appropriate congres-
sional committees status reports on the 
Border Intelligence Fusion Center Pro-
gram. The reports shall address the ele-
ments described in paragraph (1)(B). The 
reports shall also include the following: 
‘‘(I) A description of the training 
programs in place for CBP and ICE 
officers and intelligence analysts par-
ticipating in the program. 
‘‘(II) A listing of the border 
State fusion centers where CBP and 
ICE officers and intelligence analysts 
are deployed. 
‘‘(III) A representative survey of 
State, local, and tribal law enforce-
ment officers serving border jurisdic-
tions regarding the specificity and ac-
tionable nature of the border intel-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
106 
HR 1 RFS
ligence provided by CBP and ICE of-
ficers at such fusion centers. 
‘‘(IV) A description of the results 
of the customer satisfaction surveys 
submitted by users of the products de-
scribed in subsection (e)(1). 
‘‘(ii) 
DEADLINES.—Status 
reports 
under clause (i) shall be submitted not 
later than— 
‘‘(I) one year after the date of 
the enactment of the Implementing 
the 9/11 Commission Recommenda-
tions Act of 2007; and 
‘‘(II) three and five years after 
the date on which the Border Intel-
ligence Fusion Center Program is es-
tablished. 
‘‘(B) CONTINUATION
ASSESSMENT.—Not 
later than the end of the fifth year following the 
date on which the Border Intelligence Fusion 
Center Program is established, the Secretary 
shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
committees a Border Intelligence Fusion Center 
Program Continuation Assessment. The con-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
107 
HR 1 RFS
tinuation assessment shall accomplish the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(i) Recommend whether the program 
should continue in its present or some al-
tered form or not. 
‘‘(ii) Provide the reasons for that rec-
ommendation. 
‘‘(iii) If the recommendation is that 
the program should continue, list and de-
scribe legislative priorities for Congress re-
garding the continuation of the program, 
and provide recommended appropriations 
amounts and justifications for them. 
‘‘(h) DEFINITION OF BORDER STATE FUSION CEN-
TER.—The term ‘border State fusion center’ means a fu-
sion center located in the State of Washington, Idaho, 
Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, 
Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, 
Maine, California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Texas.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 203 the following: 
‘‘Sec. 204. Border Intelligence Fusion Center Program.’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
108 
HR 1 RFS
Subtitle C—Homeland Security 
Information Sharing Enhancement 
SEC. 721. SHORT TITLE. 
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Homeland Security 
Information Sharing Enhancement Act of 2007’’. 
SEC. 722. HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is amend-
ed by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 205. HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM. 
‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Under Secretary for Intel-
ligence and Analysis shall implement a Homeland Security 
Advisory System in accordance with this section to provide 
public advisories and alerts regarding threats to homeland 
security, including national, regional, local, and economic 
sector advisories and alerts, as appropriate. 
‘‘(b) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—The Under Secretary, 
under the System— 
‘‘(1) shall include, in each advisory and alert re-
garding a threat, information on appropriate protec-
tive measures and countermeasures that may be 
taken in response to the threat; 
‘‘(2) shall, whenever possible, limit the scope of 
each advisory and alert to a specific region, locality, 
or economic sector believed to be at risk; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
109 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(3) shall not, in issuing any advisory or alert, 
use color designations as the exclusive means of 
specifying the homeland security threat conditions 
that are the subject of the advisory or alert.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end of the items relating to subtitle A of title II the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘Sec. 205. Homeland Security Advisory System.’’. 
SEC. 723. HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is further 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 206. HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING. 
‘‘(a) INFORMATION SHARING ENVIRONMENT.—Con-
sistent with section 1016 of the National Intelligence Re-
form and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 
485) and in accordance with all other applicable laws and 
regulations, the Secretary shall integrate and standardize 
the information of the intelligence components of the De-
partment into a Department information sharing environ-
ment, to be administered by the Under Secretary for Intel-
ligence and Analysis. 
‘‘(b) INFORMATION
SHARING
AND
KNOWLEDGE 
MANAGEMENT OFFICERS.—For each intelligence compo-
nent of the Department, the Secretary shall designate an 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
110 
HR 1 RFS
information sharing and knowledge management officer 
who shall report to the Under Secretary for Intelligence 
and Analysis with respect to coordinating the different 
systems used in the Department to gather and disseminate 
homeland security information. 
‘‘(c) STATE, LOCAL, AND PRIVATE-SECTOR SOURCES 
OF INFORMATION.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
BUSINESS
PROC-
ESSES.—The Under Secretary for Intelligence and 
Analysis shall establish Department-wide procedures 
for the review and analysis of information gathered 
from State, local, tribal, and private-sector sources 
and, as appropriate, integrate such information into 
the information gathered by the Department and 
other department and agencies of the Federal Gov-
ernment. 
‘‘(2) FEEDBACK.—The Secretary shall develop 
mechanisms to provide analytical and operational 
feedback to any State, local, tribal, and private-sec-
tor entities that gather information and provide such 
information to the Secretary. 
‘‘(d) TRAINING AND EVALUATION OF EMPLOYEES.— 
‘‘(1) TRAINING.—The Under Secretary shall 
provide to employees of the Department opportuni-
ties for training and education to develop an under-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
111 
HR 1 RFS
standing of the definition of homeland security infor-
mation, how information available to them as part of 
their duties might qualify as homeland security in-
formation, and how information available to them is 
relevant to the Office of Intelligence and Analysis. 
‘‘(2) EVALUATIONS.—The Under Secretary 
shall, on an ongoing basis, evaluate how employees 
of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the in-
telligence components of the Department are uti-
lizing homeland security information and partici-
pating in the Department information sharing envi-
ronment.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is further amended by adding 
at the end of the items relating to such subtitle the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘Sec. 206. Homeland security information sharing.’’. 
(c) ESTABLISHMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INFORMA-
TION TECHNOLOGY NETWORK ARCHITECTURE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et 
seq.) is further amended by adding at the end the 
following new section: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
112 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘SEC. 207. COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
NETWORK ARCHITECTURE. 
‘‘(a) 
ESTABLISHMENT.—The 
Secretary, 
acting 
through the Chief Intelligence Officer, shall establish a 
comprehensive information technology network architec-
ture for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis. 
‘‘(b) NETWORK MODEL.—The comprehensive infor-
mation technology network architecture established under 
subsection (a) shall, to the extent possible, incorporate the 
approaches, features, and functions of the network pro-
posed by the Markle Foundation in reports issued in Octo-
ber 2002 and December 2003, known as the System-wide 
Homeland Security Analysis and Resource Exchange 
(SHARE) Network. 
‘‘(c) COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
NETWORK ARCHITECTURE DEFINED.—the term ‘com-
prehensive information technology network architecture’ 
means an integrated framework for evolving or maintain-
ing existing information technology and acquiring new in-
formation technology to achieve the strategic goals and in-
formation resources management goals of the Office of In-
telligence and Analysis.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con-
tents in section 1(b) of such Act is further amended 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
113 
HR 1 RFS
by adding at the end of the items relating to such 
subtitle the following: 
‘‘Sec. 207. Comprehensive information technology network architecture.’’. 
(3) REPORTS.— 
(A) REPORT
ON
IMPLEMENTATION
OF 
PLAN.—Not later than 360 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee 
on Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives a report containing a plan to imple-
ment the comprehensive information technology 
network architecture for the Office of Intel-
ligence and Analysis of the Department of 
Homeland Security required under section 205 
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as 
added by paragraph (1). Such report shall in-
clude the following: 
(i) Priorities for the development of 
the comprehensive information technology 
network architecture and a rationale for 
such priorities. 
(ii) An explanation of how the various 
components of the comprehensive informa-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
114 
HR 1 RFS
tion technology network architecture will 
work together and interconnect. 
(iii) A description of the technology 
challenges that the Office of Intelligence 
and Analysis will face in implementing the 
comprehensive information technology net-
work architecture. 
(iv) A description of technology op-
tions that are available or are in develop-
ment that may be incorporated into the 
comprehensive technology network archi-
tecture, the feasibility of incorporating 
such options, and the advantages and dis-
advantages of doing so. 
(v) An explanation of any security 
protections to be developed as part of the 
comprehensive information technology net-
work architecture. 
(vi) A description of any safeguards 
for civil liberties and privacy to be built 
into the comprehensive information tech-
nology network architecture. 
(vii) An operational best practices 
plan. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
115 
HR 1 RFS
(B) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than 
180 days after the date on which the report is 
submitted under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security shall submit to the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee 
on Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives a report on the progress of the Sec-
retary in developing the comprehensive informa-
tion technology network architecture required 
under section 205 of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002, as added by paragraph (1). 
(d) INTELLIGENCE COMPONENT DEFINED.—Section 
2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101) 
is further amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(18) The term ‘intelligence component of the 
Department’ means any directorate, agency, or ele-
ment of the Department that gathers, receives, ana-
lyzes, produces, or disseminates homeland security 
information except— 
‘‘(A) a directorate, agency, or element of 
the Department that is required to be main-
tained as a distinct entity under this Act; or 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
116 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(B) any personnel security, physical secu-
rity, document security, or communications se-
curity program within any directorate, agency, 
or element of the Department.’’. 
Subtitle D—Homeland Security 
Information Sharing Partnerships 
SEC. 731. SHORT TITLE. 
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Homeland Security 
Information Sharing Partnerships Act of 2007’’. 
SEC. 732. STATE, LOCAL, AND REGIONAL INFORMATION FU-
SION CENTER INITIATIVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is further 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 208. STATE, LOCAL, AND REGIONAL FUSION CENTER 
INITIATIVE. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall estab-
lish a State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center Initiative 
to establish partnerships with State, local, and regional 
fusion centers. 
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—Through the State, Local, and Re-
gional Fusion Center Initiative, the Secretary shall— 
‘‘(1) coordinate with the principal official of 
each State, local, or regional fusion center and the 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
117 
HR 1 RFS
official designated as the Homeland Security Advisor 
of the State; 
‘‘(2) provide Department operational and intel-
ligence advice and assistance to State, local, and re-
gional fusion centers; 
‘‘(3) support efforts to include State, local, and 
regional fusion centers into efforts to establish an 
information sharing environment (as defined under 
section 1016(a)(2) of the Intelligence Reform and 
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 
485(a)(2))) in accordance with all applicable laws 
and regulations; 
‘‘(4) conduct table-top and live training exer-
cises to regularly assess the capability of individual 
and regional networks of State, local, and regional 
fusion centers to integrate the efforts of such net-
works with the efforts of the Department; 
‘‘(5) coordinate with other relevant Federal en-
tities engaged in homeland security-related activities; 
‘‘(6) provide analytic and reporting advice and 
assistance to State, local, and regional fusion cen-
ters; 
‘‘(7) review homeland security information 
gathered by State, local, and regional fusion centers 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
118 
HR 1 RFS
and incorporate relevant information with homeland 
security information of the Department; 
‘‘(8) provide management assistance to State, 
local, and regional fusion centers; 
‘‘(9) serve as a point of contact to ensure the 
dissemination of relevant homeland security informa-
tion. 
‘‘(10) facilitate close communication and coordi-
nation between State, local, and regional fusion cen-
ters and the Department; 
‘‘(11) provide State, local, and regional fusion 
centers with expertise on Department resources and 
operations; 
‘‘(12) provide training to State, local, and re-
gional fusion centers and encourage such fusion cen-
ters to participate in terrorist threat-related exer-
cises conducted by the Department; and 
‘‘(13) carry out such other duties as the Sec-
retary determines are appropriate.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 1(b) of such Act is further amended by adding 
at the end of the items relating to such subtitle the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘Sec. 208. State, Local, and Regional Information Fusion Center Initiative.’’. 
(c) REPORTS.— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
119 
HR 1 RFS
(1) CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS.—Not later than 
90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 
and before the State, Local, and Regional Fusion 
Center Initiative under section 208 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002, as added by subsection (a), 
has been implemented, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on 
Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 
a report that contains a concept of operations for 
the Initiative, which shall include a privacy and civil 
liberties impact assessment. 
(2) PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES.— 
(A) REVIEW
OF
CONCEPT
OF
OPER-
ATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date on which the report under paragraph (1) 
is submitted, the Privacy Officer of the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security and the Officer for 
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security shall review the pri-
vacy and civil liberties implications of the Ini-
tiative and the concept of operations and report 
any concerns to the Secretary of Homeland Se-
curity and the Under Secretary of Homeland 
Security for Intelligence and Analysis. The Sec-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
120 
HR 1 RFS
retary may not implement the Initiative until 
the Privacy Officer and the Officer for Civil 
Rights and Civil Liberties have certified that 
any privacy or civil liberties concerns have been 
addressed. 
(B) REVIEW OF PRIVACY IMPACT.—Under 
the authority of section 222(5) of the Home-
land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 142(5)), 
not later than one year after the date on which 
the State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center 
Initiative is implemented, the Privacy Officer of 
the Department of Homeland Security, in con-
sultation with the Officer for Civil Rights and 
Civil Liberties of the Department of Homeland 
Security, shall submit to Congress, the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security, and the Under 
Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence 
and Analysis a report on the privacy and civil 
liberties impact of the Initiative. 
SEC. 733. HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING 
FELLOWS PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—Subtitle A of 
title II of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 
121 et seq.) is further amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
121 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘SEC. 209. HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING 
FELLOWS PROGRAM. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting 
through the Under Secretary for Intelligence and 
Analysis, shall establish a fellowship program in ac-
cordance with this section for the purpose of— 
‘‘(A) detailing State, local, and tribal law 
enforcement officers and intelligence analysts to 
the Department to participate in the work of 
the Office of Intelligence and Analysis in order 
to become familiar with— 
‘‘(i) the mission and capabilities of the 
Office of Intelligence and Analysis; and 
‘‘(ii) the role, programs, products, and 
personnel of the Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis; and 
‘‘(B) promoting information sharing be-
tween the Department and State, local, and 
tribal law enforcement officers and intelligence 
analysts by stationing such officers and ana-
lysts in order to— 
‘‘(i) serve as a point of contact in the 
Department to assist in the representation 
of State, local, and tribal homeland secu-
rity information needs; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
122 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(ii) identify homeland security infor-
mation of interest to State, local, and trib-
al law enforcement officers and intelligence 
analysts; and 
‘‘(iii) assist Department analysts in 
preparing and disseminating terrorism-re-
lated products that are tailored to State, 
local, and tribal law enforcement officers 
and intelligence analysts and designed to 
thwart terrorist attacks. 
‘‘(2) PROGRAM
NAME.—The program under 
this section shall be known as the ‘Homeland Secu-
rity Information Sharing Fellows Program’. 
‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to be eligible for 
selection as an Information Sharing Fellow under 
the program, an individual must— 
‘‘(A) have homeland security-related re-
sponsibilities or law enforcement-related respon-
sibilities; 
‘‘(B) be eligible for an appropriate national 
security clearance; 
‘‘(C) possess a valid need for access to 
classified information, as determined by the 
Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
123 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(D) be an employee of an eligible entity; 
and 
‘‘(E) have undergone appropriate privacy 
and civil liberties training that is developed, 
supported, or sponsored by the Privacy Officer 
and the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Lib-
erties in partnership with the Privacy and Civil 
Liberties Oversight Board. 
‘‘(2) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—For purposes of this 
subsection, the term ‘eligible entity’ means— 
‘‘(A) a State, local, or regional fusion cen-
ter; 
‘‘(B) a State or local law enforcement or 
other government entity that serves a major 
metropolitan area, as determined by the Sec-
retary; 
‘‘(C) a State or local law enforcement or 
other government entity that serves a suburban 
or rural area, as determined by the Secretary; 
‘‘(D) a State or local law enforcement or 
other government entity with port responsibil-
ities, as determined by the Secretary; 
‘‘(E) a State or local law enforcement or 
other government entity with border responsibil-
ities, as determined by the Secretary; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
124 
HR 1 RFS
‘‘(F) a State or local law enforcement or 
other government entity with agricultural re-
sponsibilities, as determined by the Secretary; 
‘‘(G) a tribal law enforcement or other au-
thority; or 
‘‘(H) such other entity as the Secretary de-
termines is appropriate. 
‘‘(c) OPTIONAL PARTICIPATION.—No State, local, or 
tribal law enforcement or other government entity shall 
be required to participate in the Homeland Security Infor-
mation Sharing Fellows Program. 
‘‘(d) PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATION AND SELEC-
TION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary shall 
establish procedures to provide for the nomination 
and selection of individuals to participate in the 
Homeland Security Information Sharing Fellows 
Program. 
‘‘(2) 
LIMITATIONS.—The 
Under 
Secretary 
shall— 
‘‘(A) select law enforcement officers and 
intelligence analysts representing a broad cross- 
section of State, local, and tribal agencies; and 
‘‘(B) ensure that the number of Informa-
tion Sharing Fellows selected does not impede 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
125 
HR 1 RFS
the activities of the Office of Intelligence and 
Analysis. 
‘‘(e) LENGTH
OF SERVICE.—Information Sharing 
Fellows shall serve for a reasonable period of time, as de-
termined by the Under Secretary. Such period of time 
shall be sufficient to advance the information-sharing 
goals of the Under Secretary and encourage participation 
by as many qualified nominees as possible. 
‘‘(f) CONDITION.—As a condition of selecting an indi-
vidual as an Information Sharing Fellow under the pro-
gram, the Under Secretary shall require that the individ-
ual’s employer agree to continue to pay the individual’s 
salary and benefits during the period for which the indi-
vidual is detailed. 
‘‘(g) STIPEND.—During the period for which an indi-
vidual is detailed under the program, the Under Secretary 
shall, subject to the availability of appropriations provide 
to the individual a stipend to cover the individual’s reason-
able living expenses for that period. 
‘‘(h) SECURITY CLEARANCES.—If an individual se-
lected for a fellowship under the Information Sharing Fel-
lows Program does not possess the appropriate security 
clearance, the Under Secretary shall ensure that security 
clearance processing is expedited for such individual and 
shall ensure that each such Information Sharing Fellow 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
00:41 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1.RFS
H1
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS