datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 7136 
To secure the Federal voting rights of persons who have been released 
from incarceration. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 
Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To secure the Federal voting rights of persons who have 
been released from incarceration. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Democracy Restoration 
Act of 2008’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) The right to vote is the most basic constitu-
tive act of citizenship. Regaining the right to vote 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:14 Sep 29, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7136.IH
H7136
wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
County, California, including efforts to address 
aquatic nuisance species. 
(9) 
CLAM
BAYOU
AND
DINKINS
BAYOU, 
SANIBEL
ISLAND, FLORIDA.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou and Dinkins 
Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida. 
(10) CHATTAHOOCHEE
FALL
LINE, GEORGIA 
AND ALABAMA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and Ala-
bama. 
(11) LONGWOOD
COVE, GAINESVILLE, GEOR-
GIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Longwood Cove, Gainesville, Georgia. 
(12) CITY
PARK, UNIVERSITY
LAKES, LOU-
ISIANA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
City Park, University Lakes, Louisiana. 
(13) MILL
POND, 
LITTLETON, 
MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Mill Pond, Littleton, Massachusetts. 
(14) PINE TREE BROOK, MILTON, MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
Pine Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts. 
(15) RUSH
LAKE, MINNESOTA.—Project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Rush Lake, Min-
nesota. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
(16) SOUTH
FORK
OF
THE
CROW
RIVER, 
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA.—Project for aquatic eco-
system restoration, South Fork of the Crow River, 
Hutchinson, Minnesota. 
(17) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, St. Louis, Missouri. 
(18) TRUCKEE RIVER, RENO, NEVADA.—Project 
for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, 
Reno, Nevada, including features for fish passage 
for Washoe County. 
(19) GROVER’S
MILL
POND, NEW
JERSEY.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grover’s 
Mill Pond, New Jersey. 
(20) DUGWAY
CREEK, BRATENAHL, OHIO.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dugway 
Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio. 
(21) JOHNSON CREEK, GRESHAM, OREGON.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Johnson 
Creek, Gresham, Oregon. 
(22) BEAVER
CREEK, BEAVER
AND
SALEM, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem res-
toration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, Pennsyl-
vania. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited at the ‘‘Protecting Students 
from Sexual and Violent Predators Act’’. 
SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS. 
Subpart 2 of part E of title IX of the Elementary 
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7901 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 9537. BACKGROUND CHECKS. 
‘‘(a) BACKGROUND CHECKS.—Each State that re-
ceives funds under this Act shall have in effect policies 
and procedures that— 
‘‘(1) require that criminal background checks 
be conducted for school employees that include— 
‘‘(A) a search of the State criminal reg-
istry or repository in the State in which the 
school employee resides and each State in which 
such school employee previously resided; 
‘‘(B) a search of State-based child abuse 
and neglect registries and databases in the 
State in which the school employee resides and 
each State in which such school employee pre-
viously resided; 
‘‘(C) a search of the National Crime Infor-
mation Center of the Department of Justice;
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4401 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 11, 2007 
Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic 
acid, polymer. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. 2–PROPENOIC ACID, POLYMER. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.95 of the Har-
monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
2–Propenoic acid, polymer) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 
2011’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:19 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4401.IH
H4401
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
ation and maintenance of a water resources 
project. 
‘‘(B) CREDIT FOR FUNDS.—Subject to the 
approval of the Secretary and in accordance 
with law (including regulations and policies) in 
effect on the date of enactment of this para-
graph, a non-Federal interest for a water re-
sources project may receive credit for funds 
provided for the acquisition, design, construc-
tion, management, or operation of a dredged 
material processing, treatment, contaminant re-
duction, or disposal facility to the extent the fa-
cility is used to manage dredged material from 
the project. 
‘‘(C) NON-FEDERAL
INTEREST
RESPON-
SIBILITIES.—A non-Federal interest entering 
into a partnership agreement under this sub-
section for a facility shall— 
‘‘(i) be responsible for providing all 
necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
and relocations associated with the facility; 
and 
‘‘(ii) receive credit toward the non- 
Federal share of the cost of the project 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
with respect to which the agreement is 
being entered into for those items.’’; and 
(3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection 
(d) (as redesignated by paragraph (1))— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘and maintenance’’ after 
‘‘operation’’ each place it appears; and 
(B) by inserting ‘‘processing, treatment, 
contaminant reduction, or’’ after ‘‘dredged ma-
terial’’ the first place it appears in each of 
those paragraphs. 
SEC. 2013. WETLANDS MITIGATION. 
In carrying out a water resources project that in-
volves wetlands mitigation and that has impacts that occur 
within the same watershed of a mitigation bank, the Sec-
retary, to the maximum extent practicable and where ap-
propriate, shall first consider the use of the mitigation 
bank if the bank contains sufficient available credits to 
offset the impact and the bank is approved in accordance 
with the Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and 
Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605) or 
other applicable Federal law (including regulations). 
SEC. 2014. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE LOSSES. 
(a) MITIGATION PLAN CONTENTS.—Section 906(d) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3482 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to facilitate number portability 
in order to increase consumer choice of voice service provider. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 
Mrs. BONO (for herself and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to facilitate 
number portability in order to increase consumer choice 
of voice service provider. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Same Number Act of 
2007’’. 
SEC. 2. VOICE SERVICE NUMBER PORTABILITY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Title VII of the Communications 
Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended by insert-
ing after section 714 the following: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:32 Sep 07, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3482.IH
H3482
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:19 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4401.IH
H4401
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
†
1054
HR 1585 EAS
(1) a research, engineering, and development
center;
(2) a test and evaluation activity; and
(3) any buildings, structures, or facilities located
at and supporting such center or activity.
(d) SUNSET.—The authority to carry out a project
under this section expires on September 30, 2012.
SEC. 2816. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PRO-
GRAM TO USE MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of section 2810 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3510)
is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting
‘‘September 30, 2009’’.
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Subsection (d) of such sec-
tion is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(d) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1,
2007, and March 1, 2009, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional committees reports on the pro-
gram authorized by this section. Each report shall include
a list and description of the construction projects carried
out under the program, including the location and cost of
each project.’’.
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6314 
To enable the Department of Energy and a Commission on Energy Independ-
ence and Domestic Refining Capacity the ability to study, recommend, 
and implement Federal incentive packages that would sustain and in-
crease domestic refining capacity. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
AUGUST 2, 2012 
Mr. FATTAH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To enable the Department of Energy and a Commission 
on Energy Independence and Domestic Refining Capacity 
the ability to study, recommend, and implement Federal 
incentive packages that would sustain and increase do-
mestic refining capacity. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Energy Inde-
pendence and Domestic Refining Capacity Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:28 Aug 15, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6314.IH
H6314
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3483 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
tax for qualified tuition and related expenses. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 
Mr. BOSWELL (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 
credit against tax for qualified tuition and related expenses. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Universal College 
Credit Act’’. 
SEC. 2. UNIVERSAL COLLEGE CREDIT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub-
chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting after section 25D the fol-
lowing new section: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:31 Sep 07, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3483.IH
H3483
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
‘‘SEC. 25E. UNIVERSAL COLLEGE CREDIT. 
‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of an in-
dividual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax 
imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount 
equal to the qualified tuition and related expenses paid 
by the taxpayer during the taxable year. 
‘‘(b) DOLLAR LIMITATION.—The amount allowed as 
a credit under subsection (a) with respect to each indi-
vidual for whom qualified tuition and related expenses are 
paid by the taxpayer during the taxable year shall not ex-
ceed $4,000. 
‘‘(c) CREDIT ALLOWED ONLY FOR 4 YEARS OF UN-
DERGRADUATE EDUCATION AND 6 YEARS OF GRADUATE 
EDUCATION.—An election to have this section apply with 
respect to any individual for whom qualified tuition and 
related expenses are paid by the taxpayer during the tax-
able year may not be made for any taxable year if such 
an election (by the taxpayer or any other individual) is 
in effect with respect to— 
‘‘(1) the undergraduate education expenses of 
such individual for any 4 prior taxable years, or 
‘‘(2) the graduate education expenses of such 
individual for any 6 prior taxable years. 
‘‘(d) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—No credit shall 
be allowed under this section with respect to the qualified 
tuition and related expenses of any individual if a credit 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:31 Sep 07, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3483.IH
H3483
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
United States, without regard to 
whether the special labeling bears any 
trademark involved. 
‘‘(ii) PACKAGING.—A qualifying drug 
offered for import to an individual by an 
exporter under this section that is pack-
aged in a unit-of-use container (as those 
items are defined in the United States 
Pharmacopeia and National Formulary) 
shall not be repackaged, provided that— 
‘‘(I) the packaging complies with 
all applicable regulations under sec-
tions 3 and 4 of the Poison Preven-
tion Packaging Act of 1970 (15 
U.S.C. 1471 et seq.); or 
‘‘(II) the consumer consents to 
waive the requirements of such Act, 
after being informed that the pack-
aging does not comply with such Act 
and that the exporter will provide the 
drug in packaging that is compliant at 
no additional cost. 
‘‘(iii) REQUEST FOR COPY OF SPECIAL 
LABELING
AND
INGREDIENT
LIST.—The 
Secretary shall provide to the registered 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:02 Jan 15, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H380.IH
H380
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
116 
2576), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $54,100,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost 
of $19,100,000. 
SEC. 3005. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Osce-
ola Harbor, Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is 
modified to allow non-Federal interests to construct a 
mooring facility within the existing authorized harbor 
channel, subject to all necessary permits, certifications, 
and other requirements. 
(b) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 
Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the 
responsibility of the Secretary to maintain the general 
navigation features of the project at a bottom width of 
250 feet. 
SEC. 3006. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS. 
The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for 
flood protection, Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, au-
thorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1078), is modified— 
(1) to add environmental restoration as a 
project purpose; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
117 
(2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non- 
Federal share of the cost of the project over a 30- 
year period in accordance with section 103(k) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(k)). 
SEC. 3007. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALI-
FORNIA. . 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood control, 
American and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized 
by section 101(a)(6)(A) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), as modified by section 
128 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is further modified to author-
ize the Secretary to construct the auxiliary spillway gen-
erally in accordance with the Post Authorization Change 
Report, American River Watershed Project (Folsom Dam 
Modification and Folsom Dam Raise Projects), dated De-
cember 2006, at a total cost of $683,000,000, with an es-
timated Federal cost of $444,000,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $239,000,000. 
(b) DAM SAFETY ACTIVITIES.—Nothing in this sec-
tion shall be construed to limit the authority of the Sec-
retary of the Interior to carry out dam safety activities 
in connection with the auxiliary spillway in accordance 
with the Bureau of Reclamation Safety of Dams Program. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:05 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1495.IH
H1495
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
647 
HR 3221 PCS
(F) the Department of Defense; 
(3) establish a senior-level Federal Green Build-
ing Advisory Committee, which shall provide advice 
and recommendations in accordance with subsection 
(d); 
(4) identify and biennially reassess improved or 
higher rating standards recommended by the Advi-
sory Committee; 
(5) ensure full coordination of research and de-
velopment information relating to Federal high-per-
formance green building initiatives; 
(6) identify and develop Federal high-perform-
ance green building standards that could be used for 
all types of Federal facilities; 
(7) establish green practices that can be used 
throughout the life of a Federal facility; and 
(8) review and analyze current Federal budget 
practices and life-cycle costing issues, and make rec-
ommendations to Congress, in accordance with sub-
section (d). 
(d) ADDITIONAL DUTIES.—The Federal Director, in 
coordination with the Commercial Director and the Advi-
sory Committee, shall— 
(1) identify, review, and analyze current budget 
and contracting practices that affect achievement of 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:23 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00647
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3221.PCS
H3221
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
648 
HR 3221 PCS
high-performance green buildings, including the 
identification of barriers to high-performance green 
building life-cycle costing and budgetary issues; 
(2) develop guidance and conduct training ses-
sions with budget specialists and contracting per-
sonnel from Federal agencies and budget examiners 
to apply life-cycle cost criteria to actual projects; 
(3) identify tools to aid life-cycle cost decision-
making; and 
(4) explore the feasibility of incorporating the 
benefits of high-performance green buildings, such 
as security benefits, into a cost-budget analysis to 
aid in life-cycle costing for budget and decision-
making processes. 
(e) INCENTIVES.—As soon as practicable after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Director shall 
identify incentives to encourage the use of high-perform-
ance green buildings and related technology in the oper-
ations of the Federal Government, including through— 
(1) the provision of recognition awards; and 
(2) the maximum feasible retention of financial 
savings in the annual budgets of Federal agencies 
for use in reinvesting in future high-performance 
green building initiatives. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:23 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00648
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3221.PCS
H3221
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
tion that makes a materially false, fictitious, or 
fraudulent statement, or knowingly fail to pro-
vide promptly any information requested by the 
Secretary to review such an application; 
‘‘(G) cause there to be a difference (includ-
ing a difference in active ingredient, route of 
administration, dosage form, strength, formula-
tion, manufacturing establishment, manufac-
turing process, or person that manufactures the 
drug) between a prescription drug for distribu-
tion in the United States and the drug for dis-
tribution in a permitted country; 
‘‘(H) refuse to allow an inspection author-
ized under this section of an establishment that 
manufactures a qualifying drug that is, or will 
be, introduced for commercial distribution in a 
permitted country; 
‘‘(I) fail to conform to the methods used 
in, or the facilities used for, the manufacturing, 
processing, packing, or holding of a qualifying 
drug that is, or will be, introduced for commer-
cial distribution in a permitted country to good 
manufacturing practice under this Act; 
‘‘(J) become a party to a licensing agree-
ment or other agreement related to a qualifying 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:02 Jan 15, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H380.IH
H380
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
drug that fails to provide for compliance with 
all requirements of this section with respect to 
such drug; 
‘‘(K) enter into a contract that restricts, 
prohibits, or delays the importation of a quali-
fying drug under this section; 
‘‘(L) engage in any other action to restrict, 
prohibit, or delay the importation of a quali-
fying drug under this section; or 
‘‘(M) engage in any other action that the 
Federal Trade Commission determines to dis-
criminate against a person that engages or at-
tempts to engage in the importation of a quali-
fying drug under this section. 
‘‘(2) REFERRAL OF POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS.— 
The Secretary shall promptly refer to the Federal 
Trade Commission each potential violation of sub-
paragraph (E), (F), (G), (H), or (I) of paragraph 
(1) that becomes known to the Secretary. 
‘‘(3) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.— 
‘‘(A) DISCRIMINATION.—It shall be an af-
firmative defense to a charge that a manufac-
turer has discriminated under subparagraph 
(A), (B), (C), (D), or (M) of paragraph (1) that 
the higher price charged for a prescription drug 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:02 Jan 15, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H380.IH
H380
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
(10) include an interpretive plan for the Herit-
age Area; 
(11) include a business plan that— 
(A) describes the role, operation, financing, 
and functions of— 
(i) the local coordinating entity; and 
(ii) each of the major activities ad-
dressed in the management plan; and 
(B) provides adequate assurances that the 
local coordinating entity has the partnerships 
and financial and other resources necessary to 
implement the management plan; and 
(12) includes provisions for— 
(A) 
the 
designation 
under 
section 
4(d)(1)(B) of a nonprofit or governmental orga-
nization as the local coordinating entity to ad-
minister the Heritage Area consistent with the 
management plan; and 
(B) the transition of the management of 
the Heritage Area from the Commission to the 
organization designated as the local coordi-
nating entity at the end of the 5-year period 
specified in section 4(d)(1)(A). 
(c) TERMINATION OF FUNDING.—If the Commission 
does not submit the management plan to the Secretary 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:18 Jan 31, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H713.IH
H713
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS