211
HR 4546 PCS
tory authority other than chapter 307 of title 18, United
States Code.
(2) The Secretary of Defense shall assure that—
(A) no purchase of a product or a service is
made by the Department of Defense from Federal
Prison Industries, Inc. unless the contracting officer
determines that—
(i) the product or service can be timely
furnished and will meet the performance needs
of the activity that requires the product or serv-
ice; and
(ii) the price to be paid does not exceed a
fair market price determined by competition or
a fair and reasonable price determined by price
analysis or cost analysis; and
(B) Federal Prison Industries, Inc. performs its
contractual obligations to the same extent as any
other contractor for the Department of Defense.
(b) PERFORMANCE AS A SUBCONTRACTOR.—(1) The
use of Federal Prison Industries, Inc. as a subcontractor
or supplier shall be a wholly voluntary business decision
by a Department of Defense prime contractor or subcon-
tractor, subject to any prior approval of subcontractors or
suppliers by the contracting officer which may be imposed
by regulation or by the contract.
212
HR 4546 PCS
(2) A defense contractor (or subcontractor at any
tier) using Federal Prison Industries, Inc. as a subcon-
tractor or supplier in furnishing a commercial product
pursuant to a contract shall implement appropriate man-
agement procedures to prevent introducing an inmate-pro-
duced product or inmate-furnished services into the com-
mercial market.
(3) Except as authorized under the Federal Acquisi-
tion Regulation, the use of Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
as a subcontractor or supplier of products or provider of
services shall not be imposed upon prospective or actual
defense prime contractors or subcontractors at any tier by
means of—
(A) a contract solicitation provision requiring a
contractor to offer to make use of Federal Prison
Industries, Inc. its products or services;
(B) specifications requiring the contractor to
use specific products or services (or classes of prod-
ucts or services) offered by Federal Prison Indus-
tries, Inc. in the performance of the contract;
(C) any contract modification directing the use
of Federal Prison Industries, Inc. its products or
services; or
(D) any other means.
213
HR 4546 PCS
(c) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED AND SENSITIVE IN-
FORMATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall assure that
Federal Prison Industries, Inc. is not permitted to provide
services as a contractor or subcontractor at any tier, if
an inmate worker has access to—
(1) data that is classified or will become classi-
fied after being merged with other data;
(2) geographic data regarding the location of
surface and subsurface infrastructure providing com-
munications, water and electrical power distribution,
pipelines for the distribution of natural gas, bulk pe-
troleum products and other commodities, and other
utilities; or
(3) personal or financial information about indi-
vidual private citizens, including information relating
to such person’s real property, however described,
without giving prior notice to such persons or class
of persons to the greatest extent practicable.
(d) REGULATORY IMPLEMENTATION.—
(1) PROPOSED REGULATIONS.—Proposed revi-
sions to the Department of Defense Supplement to
the Federal Acquisition Regulation to implement
this section shall be published not later than 90 days
after the date of enactment of this Act and provide
not less than 60 days for public comment.
214
HR 4546 PCS
(2) FINAL
REGULATIONS.—Final regulations
shall be published not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act and shall be effec-
tive on the date that is 30 days after the date of
publication.
SEC. 812. RENEWAL OF CERTAIN PROCUREMENT TECH-
NICAL ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREE-
MENTS AT FUNDING LEVELS AT LEAST SUFFI-
CIENT TO SUPPORT EXISTING PROGRAMS.
Section 2413 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(d) With respect to any eligible entity that has suc-
cessfully performed under a cooperative agreement entered
into under subsection (a), the Secretary shall strive, to the
greatest extent practicable and subject to appropriations,
to renew such agreement with such entity at a level of
funding which is at least equal to the level of funding
under the cooperative agreement being renewed.’’.
215
HR 4546 PCS
TITLE 
IX—DEPARTMENT 
OF
DEFENSE 
ORGANIZATION
AND MANAGEMENT
SEC. 901. CHANGE IN TITLE OF SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
TO SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS.
(a) CHANGE IN TITLE.—The position of the Sec-
retary of the Navy is hereby redesignated as the Secretary
of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference to the Secretary of
the Navy in any law, regulation, document, record, or
other paper of the United States shall be considered to
be a reference to the Secretary of the Navy and Marine
Corps.
SEC. 902. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF UNITED
STATES NORTHERN COMMAND.
Not later than September 1, 2002, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate and the House of Representatives a re-
port providing an implementation plan for the United
States Northern Command. The report shall address the
following:
(1) The required budget for standing-up and
maintaining that command.
216
HR 4546 PCS
(2) The location of the headquarters of that
command and alternatives considered for that loca-
tion, together with the criteria used in selection of
that location.
(3) The required manning levels for the com-
mand, the effect that command will have on current
Department of Defense personnel resources, and the
other commands from which personnel will be trans-
ferred to provide personnel for that command.
(4) The chain of command within that com-
mand to the component command level and a review
of permanently assigned or tasked organizations and
units.
(5) The relationship of that command to the
Office of Homeland Security and the Homeland Se-
curity Council, to other Federal departments and
agencies, and to State and local law enforcement
agencies.
(6) The relationship of that command with the
National Guard Bureau, individual State National
Guard Headquarters, and civil first responders to
ensure continuity of operational plans.
(7) The legal implications of military forces in
their Federal capacity operating on United States
territory.
217
HR 4546 PCS
(8) The status of Department of Defense
consultations—
(A) with Canada regarding Canada’s role
in, and any expansion of mission for, the North
American Air Defense Command; and
(B) with Mexico regarding Mexico’s role in
the United States Northern Command.
(9) The status of Department of Defense con-
sultations with NATO member nations on efforts to
transfer the Supreme Allied Command for the Atlan-
tic from dual assignment with the position of com-
mander of the United States Joint Forces Com-
mand.
(10) The revised mission, budget, and personnel
resources required for the United States Joint
Forces Command.
SEC. 903. NATIONAL DEFENSE MISSION OF COAST GUARD
TO BE INCLUDED IN FUTURE QUADRENNIAL
DEFENSE REVIEWS.
Section 118(d) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraph (14) as para-
graph (15); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (13) the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
218
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(14) The national defense mission of the Coast
Guard.’’.
SEC. 904. CHANGE IN YEAR FOR SUBMISSION OF QUADREN-
NIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.
Section 118(a) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘during a year’’ and inserting ‘‘dur-
ing the second year’’.
SEC. 905. REPORT ON EFFECT OF OPERATIONS OTHER
THAN WAR ON COMBAT READINESS OF THE
ARMED FORCES.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than February
28, 2004, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
a report on the effect on the combat readiness of the
Armed Forces of operations other than war in which the
Armed Forces are participating as of the date of the en-
actment of this Act (hereinafter in this section referred
to as ‘‘current operations other than war’’). Such report
shall address any such effect on combat readiness for the
Armed Forces as a whole and separately for the active
components and the reserve components.
(b) OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WAR.—For purposes
of this section, the term ‘‘operations other than war’’ in-
cludes the followng:
219
HR 4546 PCS
(1) Humanitarian operations.
(2) Counter-drug operations.
(3) Peace operations.
(4) Nation assistance.
(c) MATTERS TO BE ADDRESSED.—The report shall,
at a minimum, address the following (shown both for the
Armed Forces as a whole and separately for the active
components and the reserve components):
(1) With respect to each current operation
other than war, the number of members of the
Armed Forces who are—
(A) directly participating in the operation;
(B) supporting the operation;
(C) preparing to participate or support an
upcoming rotation to the operation; or
(D) recovering and retraining following
participation in the operation.
(2) The cost to the Department of Defense in
time, funds, resources, personnel, and equipment to
prepare for, conduct, and recover and retrain from
each such operation.
(3) The effect of participating in such oper-
ations on performance, retention, and readiness of
individual members of the Armed Forces.
220
HR 4546 PCS
(4) The effect of such operations on the readi-
ness of forces and units participating, preparing to
participate, and returning from participation in such
operations.
(5) The effect that such operations have on
forces and units that do not, have not, and will not
participate in them.
(6) The contribution to United States national
security and to regional stability of participation by
the United States in such operations, to be assessed
after receiving the views of the commanders of the
regional unified combatant commands.
(d) CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT.—The report may
be provided in classified or unclassified form as necessary.
SEC. 906. CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO REFLECT DIS-
ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE CONSEQUENCE MANAGEMENT PRO-
GRAM INTEGRATION OFFICE.
Section 12310(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by striking ‘‘only—’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘(B) while assigned’’ and inserting ‘‘only while
assigned’’.
221
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 907. AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GIFTS FOR NATIONAL DE-
FENSE UNIVERSITY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2605 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘administra-
tion of’’; and
(B) by inserting before the period at the
end of the first sentence ‘‘, or (2) the National
Defense University’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘subsection (a)(1)’’;
(C) by designating the last sentence as
paragraph (3) and in that sentence by inserting
‘‘or for the benefit or use of the National De-
fense University, as the case may be,’’ after
‘‘schools,’’; and
(D) by inserting before paragraph (3), as
designated by subparagraph (C), the following:
‘‘(2) There is established in the Treasury a fund to
be known as the ‘National Defense University Gift Fund’.
Gifts of money, and the proceeds of the sale of property,
received under subsection (a)(2) shall be deposited in the
Fund.’’;
222
HR 4546 PCS
(3) in subsection (d)(1)(A), by inserting ‘‘and
the National Defense University Gift Fund’’ before
the semicolon; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(h) In this section, the term ‘National Defense Uni-
versity’ includes any school or other component of the Na-
tional Defense University.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—(1) The heading of
such section is amended to read as follows:
‘‘§ 2605. Acceptance of gifts for defense dependents’
schools and National Defense University’’.
(2) The item relating to such section in the table of
sections at the beginning of chapter 151 of such title is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘2605. Acceptance of gifts for defense dependents’ schools and National Defense
University.’’.
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A—Financial Matters
SEC. 1001. TRANSFER AUTHORITY.
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.—
(1) Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that
such action is necessary in the national interest, the Sec-
retary may transfer amounts of authorizations made avail-
able to the Department of Defense in this division for fis-
cal year 2003 between any such authorizations for that
223
HR 4546 PCS
fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of au-
thorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be
available for the same purposes as the authorization to
which transferred.
(2) The total amount of authorizations that the Sec-
retary may transfer under the authority of this section
may not exceed $2,000,000,000.
(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by this
section to transfer authorizations—
(1) may only be used to provide authority for
items that have a higher priority than the items
from which authority is transferred; and
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an
item that has been denied authorization by Con-
gress.
(c) EFFECT
ON
AUTHORIZATION
AMOUNTS.—A
transfer made from one account to another under the au-
thority of this section shall be deemed to increase the
amount authorized for the account to which the amount
is transferred by an amount equal to the amount trans-
ferred.
(d) NOTICE
TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall
promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under
subsection (a).
224
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1002. AUTHORIZATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPRO-
PRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002.
(a) DOD AUTHORIZATIONS.—Amounts authorized to
be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal
year 2002 in the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107) are hereby ad-
justed, with respect to any such authorized amount, by
the amount by which appropriations pursuant to such au-
thorization are increased (by a supplemental appropria-
tion) or decreased (by a rescission), or both, or are in-
creased by a transfer of funds, pursuant to the following:
(1) Chapter 3 of the Emergency Supplemental
Act, 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–117; 115
Stat. 2299).
(2) Any Act enacted after May 1, 2002, making
supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for
the military functions of the Department of Defense.
(b) NNSA AUTHORIZATIONS.—Amounts authorized
to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal
year 2002 in the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107) are hereby ad-
justed, with respect to any such authorized amount, by
the amount by which appropriations pursuant to such au-
thorization are increased (by a supplemental appropria-
tion) or decreased (by a rescission), or both, or are in-
creased by a transfer of funds, pursuant to the following:
225
HR 4546 PCS
(1) Chapter 5 of the Emergency Supplemental
Act, 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–117; 115
Stat. 2307).
(2) Any Act enacted after May 1, 2002, making
supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for
the atomic energy defense activities of the Depart-
ment of Energy.
(c) LIMITATION ON TRANSFERS PENDING SUBMIS-
SION OF REPORT.—Any amount provided for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2002 through a so-called
‘transfer account’’, including the Defense Emergency Re-
sponse Fund or any other similar account, may be trans-
ferred to another account for obligation only after the Sec-
retary of Defense submits to the congressional defense
committees a report stating, for each such transfer, the
amount of the transfer, the appropriation account to
which the transfer is to be made, and the specific purpose
for which the transferred funds will be used.
(d) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION REQUIREMENT.—(1)
In the case of a pending contingent emergency supple-
mental appropriation for the military functions of the De-
partment of Defense or the atomic energy defense activi-
ties of the Department of Energy, an adjustment may be
made under subsection (a) or (b) in the amount of an au-
thorization of appropriations by reason of that supple-
226
HR 4546 PCS
mental appropriation only if, and to the extent that, the
President transmits to Congress an official budget request
for that appropriation that designates the entire amount
requested as an emergency requirement.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘contin-
gent emergency supplemental appropriation’’ means a
supplemental appropriation that—
(A) is designated by Congress as an emergency
requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985; and
(B) by law is available only to the extent that
the President transmits to the Congress an official
budget request for that appropriation that includes
designation of the entire amount of the request as
an emergency requirement.
SEC. 1003. UNIFORM STANDARDS THROUGHOUT DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE FOR EXPOSURE OF PER-
SONNEL TO PECUNIARY LIABILITY FOR LOSS
OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY.
(a) EXTENSION OF ARMY AND AIR FORCE REPORT-
OF-SURVEY PROCEDURES TO NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
AND ALL DOD CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.—(1) Chapter 165
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at
the end the following new section:
227
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘§ 2787. Reports of survey
‘‘(a) REGULATIONS.—Under such regulations as the
Secretary of Defense may prescribe, any officer of the
Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps or any civilian
employee of the Department of Defense designated by the
Secretary may act upon reports of surveys and vouchers
pertaining 
to 
the 
loss, 
spoilage, 
unserviceability,
unsuitability, or destruction of, or damage to, property of
the United States under the control of the Department
of Defense.
‘‘(b) FINALITY OF ACTION.—Action taken under sub-
section (a) is final, except that action holding a person
pecuniarily liable for loss, spoilage, destruction, or damage
is not final until approved by the Secretary.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such
chapter is amended by adding at the end the following
new item:
‘‘2787. Reports of survey.’’.
(b) EXTENSION TO MEMBERS OF THE NAVY AND
MARINE CORPS OF PAY DEDUCTION AUTHORITY PER-
TAINING TO DAMAGE OR REPAIR OF ARMS AND EQUIP-
MENT .—Section 1007(e) of title 37, United States Code,
is amended by striking ‘‘Army or the Air Force’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps’’.
232
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(7) That an annual review is performed of the
use of purchase cards issued by the Department of
Defense to determine whether each purchase card
holder has a need for the purchase card.
‘‘(8) That the Inspectors General of the De-
partment of Defense and the military services per-
form periodic audits with respect to the use of pur-
chase cards issued by the Department of Defense to
ensure that such use is in compliance with regula-
tions.
‘‘(9) That appropriate annual training is pro-
vided to each purchase card holder and each official
with responsibility for overseeing the use of purchase
cards issued by the Department of Defense.
‘‘(c) PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS.—The Secretary
shall provide in the regulations prescribed under sub-
section (a)—
‘‘(1) that procedures are implemented providing
for appropriate punishment of employees of the De-
partment of Defense for violations of such regula-
tions and for negligence, misuse, abuse, or fraud
with respect to a purchase card, including dismissal
in appropriate cases; and
‘‘(2) that a violation of such regulations by a
person subject to chapter 47 of this title (the Uni-
233
HR 4546 PCS
form Code of Military Justice) is punishable as a
violation of section 892 of this title (article 92 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to
section 2784 in the table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 165 of such title is amended to read as follows:
‘‘2784. Management of purchase cards.’’.
SEC. 1006. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS WITHIN A
MAJOR ACQUISITION PROGRAM FROM PRO-
CUREMENT TO RDT&E.
(a) PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY.—(1) Chapter 131 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after
section 2214 the following new section:
‘‘§ 2214a. Transfer of funds: transfers from procure-
ment accounts to research and develop-
ment accounts for major acquisition pro-
grams
‘‘(a) TRANSFER AUTHORITY WITHIN MAJOR PRO-
GRAMS.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of De-
fense may transfer amounts provided in an appropriation
Act for procurement for a covered acquisition program to
amounts provided in the same appropriation Act for re-
search, development, test, and evaluation for that pro-
gram.
‘‘(b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE-AND-WAIT.—A trans-
fer may be made under this section only after—
234
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional
defense committees notice in writing of the Sec-
retary’s intent to make such transfer, together with
the Secretary’s justification for the transfer; and
‘‘(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following
the date of such notification.
‘‘(c) LIMITATIONS.—From amounts appropriated for
the Department of Defense for any fiscal year for
procurement—
‘‘(1) the total amount transferred under this
section may not exceed $250,000,000; and
‘‘(2) the total amount so transferred for any ac-
quisition program may not exceed $20,000,000.
‘‘(d) COVERED ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.—In this
section, the term ‘covered acquisition program’ means an
acquisition program of the Department of Defense that
is—
‘‘(A) a major defense acquisition program for
purposes of chapter 144 of this title; or
‘‘(B) any other acquisition program of the De-
partment of Defense—
‘‘(i) that is designated by the Secretary of
Defense as a covered acquisition program for
purposes of this section; or
235
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(ii) that is estimated by the Secretary of
Defense to require an eventual total expenditure
for research, development, test, and evaluation
of more than $140,000,000 (based on fiscal
year 2000 constant dollars) or an eventual total
expenditure for procurement of more than
$660,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2000 con-
stant dollars.)
‘‘(e) TRANSFER BACK OF UNUSED TRANSFERRED
FUNDS.—If funds transferred under this section are not
used for the purposes for which transferred, such funds
shall be transferred back to the account from which trans-
ferred and shall be available for their original purpose.
‘‘(f) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer author-
ity provided in this section is in addition to any other
transfer authority available to the Secretary of Defense.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such
chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating
to section 2214 the following new item:
‘‘2214a. Transfer of funds: transfers from procurement accounts to research
and development accounts for major acquisition programs.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 2214a of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall not
apply with respect to funds appropriated before the date
of the enactment of this Act.
236
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1007. DEVELOPMENT AND PROCUREMENT OF FINAN-
CIAL AND NONFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYS-
TEMS.
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2003, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report on the modernization of the De-
partment of Defense’s financial management systems and
operations. The report shall include the following:
(1) The goals and objectives of the Financial
Management Modernization Program.
(2) The acquisition strategy for that Program,
including milestones, performance metrics, and fi-
nancial and nonfinancial resource needs.
(3) A listing of all operational and develop-
mental financial and nonfinancial management sys-
tems in use by the Department, the related costs to
operate and maintain those systems during fiscal
year 2002, and the estimated cost to operate and
maintain those systems during fiscal year 2003.
(4) An estimate of the completion date of a
transition plan that will identify which of the De-
partment’s operational and developmental financial
management systems will not be part of the objec-
tive financial and nonfinancial management system
and that provides the schedule for phase out of those
legacy systems.
237
HR 4546 PCS
(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) A contract described in sub-
section (c) may be entered into using funds made available
to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2003 only
with the approval in advance in writing of the Under Sec-
retary of Defense (Comptroller).
(2) Not more than 75 percent of the funds authorized
to be appropriated in section 201(4) for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense
Financial Modernization Program (Program Element
65016D8Z) may be obligated until the report required by
subsection (a) is received by the congressional defense
committees.
(c) COVERED CONTRACTS.—Subsection (b)(1) ap-
plies to a contract for the procurement of any of the fol-
lowing:
(1) An enterprise architecture system.
(2) A finance or accounting system.
(3) A nonfinancial business and feeder system.
(4) An upgrade to any system specified in para-
graphs (1) through (3).
(d) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:
(1) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND OP-
ERATIONS.—The term ‘‘financial management sys-
tem and operations’’ means financial, financial re-
lated, and non-financial business operations and sys-
238
HR 4546 PCS
tems used for acquisition programs, transportation,
travel, property, inventory, supply, medical, budget
formulation, financial reporting, and accounting.
Such term includes the automated and manual proc-
esses, procedures, controls, data, hardware, software,
and support personnel dedicated to the operations
and maintenance of system functions.
(2) FEEDER SYSTEMS.—The term ‘‘feeder sys-
tems’’ means financial portions of mixed systems.
(3) 
DEVELOPMENTAL
SYSTEMS
AND
PROJECTS.—The term ‘‘developmental systems and
projects’’ means any system that has not reached
Milestone C, as defined in the Department of De-
fense 5000–series regulations.
Subtitle B—Reports
SEC. 1011. AFTER-ACTION REPORTS ON THE CONDUCT OF
MILITARY 
OPERATIONS 
CONDUCTED 
AS
PART OF OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—(1) The Secretary of De-
fense shall submit to the congressional committees speci-
fied in subsection (c) two reports on the conduct of mili-
tary operations conducted as part of Operation Enduring
Freedom. The first report (which shall be an interim re-
port) shall be submitted not later than June 15, 2003.
The second report shall be submitted not later than 180
239
HR 4546 PCS
days after the date (as determined by the Secretary of De-
fense) of the cessation of hostilities undertaken as part
of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(2) Each report shall be prepared in consultation with
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the commander-
in-chief of the United States Central Command, and the
Director of Central Intelligence.
(3) Each report shall be submitted in both a classified
form and an unclassified form.
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report shall
contain a discussion of accomplishments and shortcomings
of the overall military operation. The report shall specifi-
cally include the following:
(1) A discussion of the command, control, co-
ordination, and support relationship between United
States Special Operations Forces and Central Intel-
ligence Agency elements participating in Operation
Enduring Freedom and any lessons learned from the
joint conduct of operations by those forces and ele-
ments.
(2) Recommendations to improve operational
readiness and effectiveness.
(c) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The committees
referred to in subsection (a)(1) are the following:
240
HR 4546 PCS
(1) The Committee on Armed Services and the
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2) The Committee on Armed Services and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives.
SEC. 1012. REPORT ON BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS DEFENSE
AND COUNTER-PROLIFERATION.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate and the House of Representatives a
report—
(1) describing programs and initiatives to halt,
counter, and defend against the development, pro-
duction, and proliferation of biological weapons
agents, technology, and expertise to terrorist organi-
zations and other States; and
(2) including a detailed list of the limitations
and impediments to the biological weapons defense,
nonproliferation, and counterproliferation efforts of
the Department of Defense, and recommendations to
remove such impediments and to make such efforts
more effective.
(b) CLASSIFICATION.—The report may be submitted
in unclassified or classified form as necessary.
241
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1013. REQUIREMENT THAT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REPORTS TO CONGRESS BE ACCOMPANIED
BY ELECTRONIC VERSION.
Section 480(a) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘shall, upon request’’ and all that
follows through ‘‘(or each’’ and inserting ‘‘shall provide
to Congress (or’’.
SEC. 1014. STRATEGIC FORCE STRUCTURE PLAN FOR NU-
CLEAR WEAPONS AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS.
(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense and
the Secretary of Energy shall jointly prepare a plan for
the United States strategic force structure for nuclear
weapons and nuclear weapons delivery systems for the pe-
riod of fiscal years from 2002 through 2012. The plan
shall—
(1) delineate a baseline strategic force structure
for such weapons and systems over such period con-
sistent with the Nuclear Posture Review dated Janu-
ary 2002;
(2) define sufficient force structure, force mod-
ernization and life extension plans, infrastructure,
and other elements of the defense program of the
United States associated with such weapons and sys-
tems that would be required to execute successfully
the full range of missions called for in the national
defense strategy delineated in the Quadrennial De-
242
HR 4546 PCS
fense Review dated September 30, 2001, under sec-
tion 118 of title 10, United States Code; and
(3) identify the budget plan that would be re-
quired to provide sufficient resources to execute suc-
cessfully the full range of missions using such force
structure called for in that national defense strategy.
(b) REPORT.—(1) The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Energy shall submit a report on the plan to
the congressional defense committees. Except as provided
in paragraph (2), the report shall be submitted not later
than January 1, 2003.
(2) If before January 1, 2003, the President submits
to Congress the President’s certification that it is in the
national security interest of the United States that such
report be submitted on a later date (to be specified by
the President in the certification), such report shall be
submitted not later than such later date.
(c) REPORT ON OPTIONS FOR ACHIEVING, PRIOR TO
FISCAL YEAR 2012, PRESIDENT’S OBJECTIVE FOR OPER-
ATIONALLY DEPLOYED NUCLEAR WARHEADS.—Not later
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report
on options for achieving, prior to fiscal year 2012, a pos-
ture under which the United States maintains a number
of operationally deployed nuclear warheads at a level of
243
HR 4546 PCS
from 1,700 to 2,200 such warheads, as outlined in the
Nuclear Posture Review. The report shall include the fol-
lowing:
(1) For each of fiscal years 2006, 2008, and
2010, an assessment of the options for achieving
such posture as of such fiscal year.
(2) An assessment of the effects of achieving
such posture prior to fiscal year 2012 on cost, the
dismantlement workforce, and any other affected
matter.
SEC. 1015. REPORT ON ESTABLISHMENT OF A JOINT NA-
TIONAL TRAINING COMPLEX AND JOINT OP-
POSING FORCES.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than six months
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services
of the House of Representatives a report that outlines a
plan to develop and implement a joint national training
complex. Such a complex may include multiple joint train-
ing sites and mobile training ranges and appropriate joint
opposing forces and shall be capable of supporting field
exercises and experimentation at the operational level of
war across a broad spectrum of adversary capabilities.
244
HR 4546 PCS
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report under
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An identification and description of the
types of joint training and experimentation that
would be conducted at such a joint national training
complex, together with a description of how such
training and experimentation would enhance accom-
plishment of the six critical operational goals for the
Department of Defense specified at page 30 of the
Quadrennial Defense Review Report of the Secretary
of Defense issued on September 30, 2001.
(2) A discussion of how establishment of such
a complex (including joint opposing forces) would
promote innovation and transformation throughout
the Department of Defense.
(3) A discussion of how results from training
and experiments conducted at such a complex would
be taken into consideration in the Department of
Defense plans, programs, and budgeting process and
by appropriate decision making bodies within the
Department of Defense.
(4) A methodology, framework, and options for
selecting sites for such a complex, including consid-
eration of current training facilities that would ac-
245
HR 4546 PCS
commodate requirements among all the Armed
Forces.
(5) Options for development as part of such a
complex of a joint urban warfare training center
that could also be used for homeland defense and
consequence management training for Federal,
State, and local training.
(6) Cost estimates and resource requirements to
establish and maintain such a complex, including es-
timates of costs and resource requirements for the
use of contract personnel for the performance of
management, operational, and logistics activities for
such a complex .
(7) An explanation of the relationship between
and among such a complex and the Department of
Defense Office of Transformation, the Joint Staff,
the United States Joint Forces Command, the
United States Northern Command, and each ele-
ment of the major commands within the separate
Armed Forces with responsibility for experimen-
tation and training.
(8) A discussion of how implementation of a
joint opposing force would be established, including
the feasibility of using qualified contractors for the
246
HR 4546 PCS
function of establishing and maintaining joint oppos-
ing forces and the role of foreign forces.
(9) Submission of a time line to establish such
a center and for such a center to achieve initial
operational capability and full operational capability.
SEC. 1016. REPEAL OF VARIOUS REPORTS REQUIRED OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) PROVISIONS
OF TITLE 10.—Title 10, United
States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)(A) Section 230 is repealed.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 9 is amended by striking the item relating
to section 230.
(2) Section 526 is amended by striking sub-
section (c).
(3) Section 721(d) is amended—
(A) by striking paragraph (2); and
(B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘If an offi-
cer’’.
(4) Section 986 is amended by striking sub-
section (e).
(5) Section 1095(g) is amended—
(A) by striking paragraph (2); and
(B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(g)’’.
247
HR 4546 PCS
(6) Section 1798 is amended by striking sub-
section (d).
(7) Section 1799 is amended by striking sub-
section (d).
(8) Section 2010 is amended by striking sub-
section (b).
(9) Section 2327(c)(1) is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking
‘‘after the date on which such head of an agen-
cy submits to Congress a report on the con-
tract’’ and inserting ‘‘if in the best interests of
the Government’’; and
(B) by striking subparagraph (B).
(10) Section 2350f is amended by striking sub-
section (c).
(11) Section 2350k is amended by striking sub-
section (d).
(12) Section 2492 is amended by striking sub-
section (c).
(13) Section 2493 is amended by striking sub-
section (g).
(14) Section 2563(c)(2) is amended by striking
‘‘and notifies Congress regarding the reasons for the
waiver’’.
248
HR 4546 PCS
(15) Section 2611 is amended by striking sub-
section (e).
(16) Sections 4357, 6975, and 9356 are each
amended—
(A) by striking subsection (c); and
(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Subject
to subsection (c), the Secretary’’ and inserting
‘‘The Secretary’’.
(17) Section 4416 is amended by striking sub-
section (f).
(18) Section 5721(f) is amended—
(A) by striking paragraph (2); and
(B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ after the subsection
heading.
(19) Section 12302 is amended—
(A) in subsection (b), by striking the last
sentence; and
(B) by striking subsection (d).
(b) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1995.—Section 553(b) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law
103–337; 108 Stat. 2772; 10 U.S.C. 4331 note) is amend-
ed by striking the last sentence.
249
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1017. REPORT ON THE ROLE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE IN SUPPORTING HOMELAND SECU-
RITY.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than December
31, 2002, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on Department
of Defense responsibilities, mission, and plans for military
support of homeland security.
(b) CONTENT OF REPORT.—The report shall include,
but not be limited to, a discussion of the following:
(1) Changes in organization regarding the roles,
mission, and responsibilities carried out by the De-
partment of Defense to support its homeland secu-
rity mission and the reasons for those changes based
upon the findings of the study and report required
by section 1511 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107;
115 Stat. 1271).
(2) Changes in the roles, missions, and respon-
sibilities of the Department of the Army, the De-
partment of the Navy, and the Department of the
Air Force with respect to homeland security and the
reasons for such changes.
(3) Changes in the roles, missions, and respon-
sibilities of unified commands with homeland secu-
rity missions and the reasons for such changes.
250
HR 4546 PCS
(4) Changes in the roles, missions, and respon-
sibilities of the United States Joint Forces Com-
mand and the United States Northern Command in
expanded homeland security training and experimen-
tation involving the Department of Defense and
other Federal, State, and local entities, and the rea-
sons for such changes.
(5) Changes in the roles, missions, and respon-
sibilities of the Army National Guard and the Air
National Guard in the homeland security mission of
the Department of Defense, and the reasons for
such changes.
(6) The status of the unconventional nuclear
warfare defense test bed program established in re-
sponse to title IX of the Department of Defense Ap-
propriations Act, 2002 (division A of Public Law
107–117; 115 Stat. 2289), including the plan and
program for establishing such test beds.
(7) The plans and status of the Department of
Defense homeland security biological defense pro-
gram, including the plans and status of—
(A) the biological counter terrorism re-
search program;
(B) the biological defense homeland secu-
rity support program;
251
HR 4546 PCS
(C) pilot programs for establishing biologi-
cal defense test beds on Department of Defense
installations and in selected urban areas of the
United States;
(D) programs for expanding the capacity
of the Department of Defense to meet increased
demand for vaccines against biological agents;
and
(E) any plans to coordinate Department of
Defense work in biological defense programs
with other Federal, State, and local programs.
(8) Recommendations for legislative changes
that may be required to execute the roles and mis-
sions set forth in Department of Defense homeland
security plans.
SEC. 1018. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR EARTH PEN-
ETRATOR WEAPONS AND OTHER WEAPONS.
(a) NAS STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall re-
quest the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a
study and prepare a report on the anticipated short-term
and long-term effects of the use of a nuclear earth pene-
trator weapon on the target area, including the effects on
civilian populations in proximity to the target area and
on United States military personnel performing operations
and battle damage assessments in the target area, and the
252
HR 4546 PCS
anticipated short-term and long-term effects on the civil-
ian population in proximity to the target area if—
(1) a non-penetrating nuclear weapon is used to
destroy hard or deeply-buried targets; or
(2) a conventional high-explosive weapon is
used to destroy an adversary’s weapons of mass de-
struction storage or production facilities, and radio-
active, nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons ma-
terials, agents, or other contaminants are released or
spread into populated areas.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit
to Congress the report under subsection (a), together with
any comments the Secretary may consider appropriate on
the report. The report shall be submitted in unclassified
form to the maximum extent possible, with a classified
annex if needed.
SEC. 1019. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR-TIPPED BAL-
LISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPTORS AND NU-
CLEAR MISSILES NOT INTERCEPTED.
(a) NAS STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall re-
quest the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a
study and prepare a report on the anticipated short-term
and long-term effects of the use of a nuclear-tipped bal-
listic missile interceptor, including the effects on civilian
253
HR 4546 PCS
populations and on United States military personnel in
proximity to the target area, and the immediate, short-
term, and long-term effects on the civilian population of
a major city of the United States, and the Nation as a
whole, if a ballistic missile carrying a nuclear weapon is
not intercepted and detonates directly above a major city
of the United States.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit
to Congress the report under subsection (a), together with
any comments the Secretary may consider appropriate on
the report. The report shall be submitted in unclassified
form to the maximum extent possible, with a classified
annex if needed.
SEC. 1020. LIMITATION ON DURATION OF FUTURE DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE REPORTING REQUIRE-
MENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 480 the
following new section:
‘‘§ 480a. Recurring reporting requirements: five-year
limitation
‘‘(a) FIVE-YEAR SUNSET.—Any recurring congres-
sional defense reporting requirement that is established by
a provision of law enacted on or after the date of the en-
254
HR 4546 PCS
actment of the Bob Stump National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (including a provision of
law enacted as part of that Act) shall cease to be effective,
with respect to that requirement, at the end of the five-
year period beginning on the date on which such provision
is enacted, except as otherwise provided by law.
‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—A provision of law
enacted after the date of the enactment of this section may
not be considered to supersede the provisions of subsection
(a) unless that provision specifically refers to subsection
(a) and specifically states that it supersedes subsection
(a).
‘‘(c) RECURRING CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE RE-
PORTING REQUIREMENTS.—In this section, the term ‘re-
curring defense congressional reporting requirement’
means a requirement by law for the submission of an an-
nual, semiannual, or other regular periodic report to Con-
gress, or one or more committees of Congress, that applies
only to the Department of Defense or to one or more offi-
cers of the Department of Defense.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 480 the following new
item:
‘‘480a. Recurring reporting requirements: five-year limitation.’’.
255
HR 4546 PCS
Subtitle C—Other Matters
SEC. 1021. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MAINTENANCE OF A
RELIABLE, FLEXIBLE, AND ROBUST STRA-
TEGIC DETERRENT.
It is the sense of Congress that, consistent with the
national defense strategy delineated in the Quadrennial
Defense Review dated September 30, 2001 (as submitted
under section 118 of title 10, United States Code), the
Nuclear Posture Review dated January 2002, and the
global strategic environment, the President should, to de-
fend the Nation, deter aggressors and potential adver-
saries, assure friends and allies, defeat enemies, dissuade
competitors, advance the foreign policy goals and vital in-
terests of the United States, and generally ensure the na-
tional security of the United States, take the following ac-
tions:
(1) Maintain an operationally deployed strategic
force of not less than 1,700 nuclear weapons for im-
mediate and unexpected contingencies.
(2) Maintain a responsive force of non-deployed
nuclear weapons for potential contingencies at readi-
ness and numerical levels determined to be—
(A) essential to the execution of the Single
Integrated Operational Plan; or
256
HR 4546 PCS
(B) necessary to maintain strategic flexi-
bility and capability in accordance with the
findings and conclusions of such Nuclear Pos-
ture Review.
(3) Develop advanced conventional weapons,
and nuclear weapons, capable of destroying—
(A) hard and deeply buried targets; and
(B) enemy weapons of mass destruction
and the development and production facilities of
such enemy weapons.
(4) Develop a plan to achieve and maintain the
capability to resume conducting underground tests
of nuclear weapons within one year after a decision
is made to resume conducting such tests, so as to
have the means to maintain robust and adaptive
strategic forces through a ready, responsive, and ca-
pable nuclear infrastructure, as prescribed in such
Nuclear Posture Review.
(5) Develop a plan to revitalize the Nation’s nu-
clear weapons industry and infrastructure so as to
facilitate the development and production of safer,
more reliable, and more effective nuclear weapons.
257
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1022. TIME FOR TRANSMITTAL OF ANNUAL DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 113 the
following new section:
‘‘§ 113a. Transmission of annual defense authoriza-
tion request
‘‘(a) TIME FOR TRANSMITTAL.—The Secretary of
Defense shall transmit to Congress the annual defense au-
thorization request for a fiscal year during the first 30
days after the date on which the President transmits to
Congress the budget for that fiscal year pursuant to sec-
tion 1105 of title 31.
‘‘(b) DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION
REQUEST
DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘defense authorization
request’, with respect to a fiscal year, means a legislative
proposal submitted to Congress for the enactment of the
following:
‘‘(1) Authorizations of appropriations for that
fiscal year, as required by section 114 of this title.
‘‘(2) Personnel strengths for that fiscal year, as
required by section 115 of this title.
‘‘(3) Any other matter that is proposed by the
Secretary of Defense to be enacted as part of the
annual defense authorization bill for that fiscal
year.’’.
258
HR 4546 PCS
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 113 the following new
item:
‘‘113a. Transmission of annual defense authorization request.’’.
SEC. 1023. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10,
United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 153 is amended by inserting ‘‘(a)
PLANNING; ADVICE; POLICY FORMULATION.—’’ at
the beginning of the text.
(2) Section 663(e)(2) is amended by striking
‘‘Armed Forces Staff College’’ and inserting ‘‘Joint
Forces Staff College’’.
(3) Section 2399(a)(2) is amended—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A), by striking ‘‘means—’’ and inserting
‘‘means 
a 
conventional 
weapons 
system
that—’’; and
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘a
conventional weapons system that’’.
(4)(A) Section 2410h is transferred to the end
of subchapter IV of chapter 87 and is redesignated
as section 1747.
(B) The item relating to that section in the
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 141 is
259
HR 4546 PCS
transferred to the end of the table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 87 and is
amended to reflect the redesignation made by sub-
paragraph (A).
(5) Section 2677 is amended by striking sub-
section (c).
(6) Section 2680(e) is amended by striking
‘‘the’’ after ‘‘the Committee on’’ the first place it ap-
pears.
(7) Section 2815(b) is amended by striking ‘‘for
fiscal year 2003 and each fiscal year thereafter’’ and
inserting ‘‘for any fiscal year’’.
(8) Section 2828(b)(2) is amended by inserting
‘‘time’’ after ‘‘from time to’’.
(b) TITLE 37, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 37,
United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 302j(a) is amended by striking
‘‘subsection (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’.
(2) Section 324(b) is amended by striking ‘‘(1)’’
before ‘‘The Secretary’’.
(c) PUBLIC LAW 107–107.—Effective as of Decem-
ber 28, 2001, and as if included therein as enacted, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002
(Public Law 107–107) is amended as follows:
260
HR 4546 PCS
(1) Section 602(a)(2) (115 Stat. 1132) is
amended by striking ‘‘an’’ in the first quoted matter.
(2) Section 1410(a)(3)(C) (115 Stat. 1266) by
inserting ‘‘both places it appears’’ before ‘‘and in-
serting’’.
(3) Section 3007(d)(1)(C) (115 Stat. 1352) is
amended by striking ‘‘2905(b)(7)(B)(iv)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘2905(b)(7)(C)(iv)’’.
(d) PUBLIC LAW 106–398.—Effective as of October
30, 2000, and as if included therein as enacted, the Floyd
D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398)
is amended as follows:
(1) Section 577(b)(2) (114 Stat. 1654A–140) is
amended by striking ‘‘Federal’’ in the quoted matter
and inserting ‘‘Department of Defense’’.
(2) Section 612(c)(4)(B) (114 Stat. 1654A–
150) is amended by striking the comma at the end
of the first quoted matter.
(e) PUBLIC LAW 106–65.—The National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–
65) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 573(b) (10 U.S.C. 513 note) is
amended by inserting a period at the end of para-
graph (2).
261
HR 4546 PCS
(2) Section 1305(6) (22 U.S.C. 5952 note) is
amended by striking the first period after ‘‘facility’’.
(f) TITLE 14, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section
516(c) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by
striking ‘‘his section’’ and inserting ‘‘this section’’.
SEC. 1024. WAR RISK INSURANCE FOR VESSELS IN SUP-
PORT OF NATO-APPROVED OPERATIONS.
Section 1205 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46
App. U.S.C. 1285) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(c) INSURANCE
OF
VESSELS
IN
SUPPORT
OF
NATO-APPROVED OPERATIONS.—(1) Upon request made
under subsection (b), the Secretary may provide insurance
for a vessel, regardless of the country in which the vessel
is registered and the citizenship of its owners, that is sup-
porting a military operation approved by the North Atlan-
tic Council, including a vessel that is not operating under
contract with a department or agency of the United
States.
‘‘(2) If a vessel is insured under paragraph (1) in
response to a request made pursuant to an international
agreement providing for the sharing among nations of the
risks involved in mutual or joint operations, the Secretary
of Transportation, with the concurrence of the Secretary
of State, may seek from another nation that is a party
262
HR 4546 PCS
to such agreement a commitment to indemnify the United
States for any amounts paid by the United States for
claims against such insurance.
‘‘(3) Amounts received by the United States as in-
demnity from a nation pursuant to paragraph (2) shall
be deposited into the insurance fund created under section
1208.
‘‘(4) Any obligation of a department or agency of the
United States to indemnify the Secretary or the insurance
fund for any claim against insurance provided under this
subsection is extinguished to the extent of any indem-
nification received from a nation pursuant to paragraph
(2) with respect to the claim.’’.
SEC. 1025. CONVEYANCE, NAVY DRYDOCK, PORTLAND, OR-
EGON.
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of
the Navy may sell Navy Drydock No. YFD-69, located in
Portland, Oregon, to Portland Shipyard, LLC, which is
the current user of the drydock.
(b) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance
under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that
the purchaser agree to retain the drydock on Swan Island
in Portland, Oregon, until at least September 30, 2007.
(c) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the con-
veyance of the drydock under subsection (a), the pur-
263
HR 4546 PCS
chaser shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to the
fair market value of the drydock at the time of the convey-
ance, as determined by the Secretary.
(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.—The
Secretary may require such additional terms and condi-
tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection
(a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the
interests of the United States.
SEC. 1026. ADDITIONAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
CIVIL SUPPORT TEAMS.
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1) establish 23 additional teams designated as
Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams
(for a total of 55 such teams); and
(2) ensure that of such 55 teams there is at
least one team established for each State and terri-
tory.
(b) STATE AND TERRITORY DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘State and territory’’ means the several
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and
the Virgin Islands.
264
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1027. USE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES OF
DNA SAMPLES MAINTAINED BY DEPARTMENT
OF 
DEFENSE 
FOR 
IDENTIFICATION 
OF
HUMAN REMAINS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 80 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section:
‘‘§ 1566. DNA samples maintained for identification of
human remains: use for law enforcement
purposes
‘‘(a) COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER.—(1) Sub-
ject to paragraph (2), if a valid order of a Federal court
(or military judge) so requires, an element of the Depart-
ment of Defense that maintains a repository of DNA sam-
ples for the purpose of identification of human remains
shall make available, for the purpose specified in sub-
section (b), such DNA samples on such terms and condi-
tions as such court (or military judge) directs.
‘‘(2) A DNA sample with respect to an individual
shall be provided under paragraph (1) in a manner that
does not compromise the ability of the Department of De-
fense to maintain a sample with respect to that individual
for the purpose of identification of human remains.
‘‘(b) COVERED PURPOSE.—The purpose referred to
in subsection (a) is the purpose of an investigation or pros-
265
HR 4546 PCS
ecution of a felony, or any sexual offense, for which no
other source of DNA information is available.
‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘DNA
sample’ has the meaning given such term in section
1565(c) of this title.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding
at the end the following new item:
‘‘1566. DNA samples maintained for identification of human remains: use for
law enforcement purposes.’’.
SEC. 1028. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING AIRCRAFT
CARRIER FORCE STRUCTURE.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings:
(1) The aircraft carrier has been an integral
component in Operation Enduring Freedom and in
the homeland defense mission beginning on Sep-
tember 11, 2001. The aircraft carriers that have
participated in Operation Enduring Freedom, as of
May 1, 2002, are the USS Enterprise (CVN–65),
the USS Carl Vinson (CVN–70), the USS Kitty
Hawk (CV–63), the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN–
71), the USS John C. Stennis (CVN–74), and the
USS John F. Kennedy (CV–67). The aircraft car-
riers that have participated in the homeland defense
mission are the USS George Washington (CVN–73),
266
HR 4546 PCS
the USS John F. Kennedy (CV–67), and the USS
John C. Stennis (CVN–74).
(2) Since 1945, the United States has built 172
bases overseas, of which only 24 are currently in
use.
(3) The aircraft carrier provides an independent
base of operations should no land base be available
for aircraft.
(4) The aircraft carrier is an essential compo-
nent of the Navy.
(5) Both the F/A–18E/F aircraft program and
the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program are pro-
ceeding on schedule for deployment on aircraft car-
riers.
(6) As established by the Navy, the United
States requires the service of 15 aircraft carriers to
completely fulfill all the naval commitments assigned
to it without gapping carrier presence.
(7) The Navy requires, at a minimum, at least
12 carriers to accomplish its current missions.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the number of aircraft carriers of the Navy in
active service should not be less than 12.
(c) COMMENDATION OF CREWS.—Congress hereby
commends the crews of the aircraft carriers that have par-
267
HR 4546 PCS
ticipated in Operation Enduring Freedom and the home-
land defense mission.
SEC. 1029. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN FOREIGN
LANGUAGE SERVICES DURING PERIODS OF
EMERGENCY.
(a) NATIONAL FOREIGN LANGUAGE SKILLS REG-
ISTRY.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may establish and
maintain a secure data registry to be known as the ‘‘Na-
tional Foreign Language Skills Registry’’. The data reg-
istry shall consist of the names of, and other pertinent
information on, linguistically qualified United States citi-
zens and permanent resident aliens who state that they
are willing to provide linguistic services in times of emer-
gency designated by the Secretary of Defense to assist the
Department of Defense and other Departments and agen-
cies of the United States with translation and interpreta-
tion in languages designated by the Secretary of Defense
as critical languages.
(2) The name of a person may be included in the
Registry only if the person expressly agrees for the per-
son’s name to be included in the Registry. Any such agree-
ment shall be made in such form and manner as may be
specified by the Secretary.
(b) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT VOLUNTARY TRANS-
LATION
AND
INTERPRETATION
SERVICES.—Section
268
HR 4546 PCS
1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(6) Language translation and interpretation
services.’’.
SEC. 1030. SURFACE COMBATANT INDUSTRIAL BASE.
(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall con-
duct a review of the effect of the contract award an-
nounced on April 29, 2002, for the lead design agent for
the DD(X) ship program on the industrial base for ship
combat system development, including the industrial base
for each of the following: ship systems integration, radar,
electronic warfare, launch systems, and other components.
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 31,
2003, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report based on the review under sub-
section (a). The report shall provide the Secretary’s as-
sessment of the effect of that contract award on the ship
combat system technology and industrial base and shall
describe any actions that the Secretary proposes to ensure
future competition across the array of technologies that
encompass the combat systems of future surface ships, in-
cluding the next generation cruiser (CG(X)), the littoral
combat ship (LCS), and the joint command ship
(JCC(X)).
269
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1031. ENHANCED COOPERATION BETWEEN UNITED
STATES AND RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO PRO-
MOTE MUTUAL SECURITY.
(a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the
United States to pursue greater cooperation, trans-
parency, and confidence with the Russian Federation re-
garding nuclear weapons policy, force structure, safe-
guards, testing, and proliferation prevention, as well as
nuclear weapons infrastructure, production, and dis-
mantlement, so as to promote mutual security, stability,
and trust.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING ENHANCED
COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA.—It is the sense of Congress
that the President of the United States should continue
to engage the President of the Russian Federation to
achieve the following objectives, consistent with United
States national security, in the interest of promoting mu-
tual trust, security, and stability:
(1) An agreement that would seek to prevent
the illicit use, diversion, theft, or proliferation of tac-
tical nuclear weapons, and their key components and
materials, by—
(A) withdrawing deployed nonstrategic nu-
clear weapons;
270
HR 4546 PCS
(B) accounting for, consolidating, and se-
curing the Russian Federation’s nonstrategic
nuclear weapons; and
(C) dismantling or destroying United
States and Russian nonstrategic nuclear weap-
ons in excess of each nation’s legitimate defense
needs.
(2) A reciprocal program of joint visits by nu-
clear weapons scientists and experts of the United
States and the Russian Federation to the United
States nuclear test site in Nevada, and the Russian
nuclear test site at Novya Zemlya.
(3) A reciprocal program of joint visits and con-
ferences at each nation’s nuclear weapons labora-
tories and nuclear weapons development and produc-
tion facilities to discuss how to improve the safety
and security of each nation’s nuclear stockpile, nu-
clear materials, and nuclear infrastructure.
(4) A reciprocal program of joint visits and con-
ferences to explore greater cooperation between the
United States and the Russian Federation with re-
gard to ballistic missile defenses against intentional,
unauthorized, and accidental launches of ballistic
missiles.
271
HR 4546 PCS
(5) A joint commission on nonproliferation,
composed of senior nonproliferation and intelligence
officials from the United States and the Russian
Federation, to meet regularly in a closed forum to
discuss ways to prevent rogue states and potential
adversaries from acquiring—
(A) weapons of mass destruction and bal-
listic missiles;
(B) the dual-use goods, technologies, and
expertise necessary to develop weapons of mass
destruction and ballistic missiles; and
(C) advanced conventional weapons.
(6) A joint program to develop advanced meth-
ods for disposal of weapons-grade nuclear materials
excess to defense needs, including safe, proliferation
resistant, advanced nuclear fuel cycles that achieve
more complete consumption of weapons materials,
and other methods that minimize waste and hazards
to health and the environment.
(7) A joint program to develop methods for
safeguarding, treating, and disposing of spent reac-
tor fuel and other nuclear waste so as to minimize
the risk to public health, property, and the environ-
ment, as well as the possibility of diversion to illicit
purposes.
272
HR 4546 PCS
(8) A joint program, built upon existing pro-
grams, to cooperatively develop advanced methods
and techniques for establishing a state-of-the-art in-
ventory control and monitoring system for nuclear
weapons and material.
(c) REPORT.—No later than March 1, 2003, the
President shall submit to Congress a report (in unclassi-
fied or classified form as necessary) on the status of the
objectives under subsection (b). The report shall include
the following:
(1) A description of the actions taken by the
President to engage the Russian Federation to
achieve those objectives.
(2) A description of the progress made to
achieve those objectives.
(3) A description of the response of the Russian
Federation to the actions referred to in paragraph
(1).
(4) The President’s assessment of the Russian
Federation’s commitment to a better, closer relation-
ship with the United States based on the principles
of increased cooperation and transparency.
273
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1032. TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO INCREASE AMOUNTS
FOR PAC–3 MISSILE PROCUREMENT AND
ISRAELI ARROW PROGRAM.
(a) INCREASE
FOR PAC–3 PROCUREMENT.—The
amount provided in section 101 for Missile Procurement,
Army, is hereby increased by $65,000,000, to be available
for an additional 24 PAC–3 missiles.
(b) INCREASE FOR ISRAELI ARROW PROGRAM.—The
amount provided in section 201(4) for the Missile Defense
Agency is hereby increased by $70,000,000, to be available
within program element 0603881C, Terminal Defense
Segment, only for the Israeli Arrow Ballistic Missile De-
fense System program.
(c) CORRESPONDING REDUCTION.—The amount pro-
vided in section 201(4) for research, development, test,
and evaluation, Defense-wide, is hereby reduced by
$135,000,000, to be derived from amounts available to the
Missile Defense Agency.
SEC. 1033. ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERS TO ASSIST IMMIGRA-
TION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AND
CUSTOMS SERVICE.
(a) ASSIGNMENT AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF DE-
FENSE.—Chapter 18 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after section 374 the following new
section:
274
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘§ 374a. Assignment of members to assist border pa-
trol and control
‘‘(a) ASSIGNMENT AUTHORIZED.—Upon submission
of a request consistent with subsection (b), the Secretary
of Defense may assign members of the Army, Navy, Air
Force, and Marine Corps to assist—
‘‘(1) the Immigration and Naturalization Serv-
ice in preventing the entry of terrorists, drug traf-
fickers, and illegal aliens into the United States; and
‘‘(2) the United States Customs Service in the
inspection of cargo, vehicles, and aircraft at points
of entry into the United States to prevent the entry
of weapons of mass destruction, components of
weapons of mass destruction, prohibited narcotics or
drugs, or other terrorist or drug trafficking items.
‘‘(b) REQUEST FOR ASSIGNMENT.—The assignment
of members under subsection (a) may occur only if—
‘‘(1) the assignment is at the request of the At-
torney General, in the case of an assignment to the
Immigration and Naturalization Service, or the Sec-
retary of the Treasury, in the case of an assignment
to the United States Customs Service; and
‘‘(2) the request of the Attorney General or the
Secretary of the Treasury (as the case may be) is
accompanied by a certification by the President that
the assignment of members pursuant to the request
275
HR 4546 PCS
is necessary to respond to a threat to national secu-
rity posed by the entry into the United States of ter-
rorists or drug traffickers.
‘‘(c) TRAINING PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Attorney
General or the Secretary of the Treasury (as the case may
be), together with the Secretary of Defense, shall establish
a training program to ensure that members receive general
instruction regarding issues affecting law enforcement in
the border areas in which the members may perform du-
ties under an assignment under subsection (a). A member
may not be deployed at a border location pursuant to an
assignment under subsection (a) until the member has
successfully completed the training program.
‘‘(d) CONDITIONS OF USE.—(1) Whenever a member
who is assigned under subsection (a) to assist the Immi-
gration and Naturalization Service or the United States
Customs Service is performing duties at a border location
pursuant to the assignment, a civilian law enforcement of-
ficer from the agency concerned shall accompany the
member.
‘‘(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to—
‘‘(A) authorize a member assigned under sub-
section (a) to conduct a search, seizure, or other
similar law enforcement activity or to make an ar-
rest; and
276
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(B) supersede section 1385 of title 18 (popu-
larly known as the ‘Posse Comitatus Act’).
‘‘(e) ESTABLISHMENT
OF ONGOING JOINT TASK
FORCES.—(1) The Attorney General or the Secretary of
the Treasury may establish ongoing joint task forces when
accompanied by a certification by the President that the
assignment of members pursuant to the request to estab-
lish a joint task force is necessary to respond to a threat
to national security posed by the entry into the United
States of terrorists or drug traffickers.
‘‘(2) When established, any joint task force shall fully
comply with the standards as set forth in this section.
‘‘(f) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—The Attorney
General or the Secretary of the Treasury (as the case may
be) shall notify the Governor of the State in which mem-
bers are to be deployed pursuant to an assignment under
subsection (a), and local governments in the deployment
area, of the deployment of the members to assist the Im-
migration and Naturalization Service or the United States
Customs Service (as the case may be) and the types of
tasks to be performed by the members.
‘‘(g) REIMBURSEMENT REQUIREMENT.—Section 377
of this title shall apply in the case of members assigned
under subsection (a).
277
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘(h) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—No assignment
may be made or continued under subsection (a) after Sep-
tember 30, 2005.’’.
(b) COMMENCEMENT OF TRAINING PROGRAM.—The
training program required by subsection (b) of section
374a of title 10, United States Code, shall be established
as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 374 the following new
item:
‘‘374a. Assignment of members to assist border patrol and control.’’.
SEC. 1034. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROHIBITION OF USE
OF FUNDS FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL
COURT.
It is the sense of Congress that none of the funds
appropriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations
in this Act should be used for any assistance to, or to
cooperate with or to provide any support for, the Inter-
national Criminal Court.
278
HR 4546 PCS
TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL
MATTERS
SEC. 1101. ELIGIBILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
NONAPPROPRIATED FUND EMPLOYEES FOR
LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9001(1) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’;
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the comma
at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol-
lowing new subparagraph:
‘‘(D) an employee of a nonappropriated
fund instrumentality of the Department of De-
fense described in section 2105(c),’’.
(b) DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY.—Section 9002 of
such title is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d),
and (e) as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respec-
tively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol-
lowing new subsection (b):
‘‘(b) DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY REGARDING NON-
APPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may determine that a nonappropriated
279
HR 4546 PCS
fund instrumentality of the Department of Defense is cov-
ered under this chapter or is covered under an alternative
long-term care insurance program.’’.
SEC. 1102. EXTENSION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AU-
THORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE
PAYMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5,
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and
inserting ‘‘2006’’.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit
to Congress a report including recommendations whether
the authority under section 5595(i) of title 5, United
States Code, should be made permanent or expanded to
be made Governmentwide.
SEC. 1103. COMMON OCCUPATIONAL AND HEALTH STAND-
ARDS FOR DIFFERENTIAL PAYMENTS AS A
CONSEQUENCE OF EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS.
(a) 
PREVAILING
RATE
SYSTEMS.—Section
5343(c)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by
inserting before the semicolon at the end the following:
‘‘, and for any hardship or hazard related to asbestos, such
differentials shall be determined by applying occupational
safety and health standards consistent with the permis-
sible exposure limit promulgated by the Secretary of
280
HR 4546 PCS
Labor under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970’’.
(b) GENERAL
SCHEDULE
PAY
RATES.—Section
5545(d) of such title is amended by inserting before the
period at the end of the first sentence the following: ‘‘,
and for any hardship or hazard related to asbestos, such
differentials shall be determined by applying occupational
safety and health standards consistent with the permis-
sible exposure limit promulgated by the Secretary of
Labor under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970’’.
(c) APPLICABILITY.—Subject to any vested constitu-
tional property rights, any administrative or judicial deter-
mination after the date of enactment of this Act con-
cerning backpay for a differential established under sec-
tions 5343(c)(4) or 5545(d) of such title shall be based
on occupational safety and health standards described in
the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b).
SEC. 
1104. 
CONTINUATION 
OF 
FEDERAL 
EMPLOYEE
HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY.
Paragraph (4)(B) of section 8905a(d) of title 5,
United States Code, is amended—
(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘2003’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘2006’’; and
(2) in clause (ii)—
281
HR 4546 PCS
(A) by striking ‘‘2004’’ and inserting
‘‘2007’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting
‘‘2006’’.
SEC. 1105. TRIENNIAL FULL-SCALE FEDERAL WAGE SYSTEM
WAGE SURVEYS.
Section 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘2 years’’
and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking the pe-
riod at the end and inserting ‘‘, based on criteria de-
veloped by the Office.’’.
SEC. 1106. CERTIFICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING POSITIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 81 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section:
‘‘§ 1599d. Professional accounting positions: authority
to prescribe certification and credential
standards
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE PROFESSIONAL
CERTIFICATION STANDARDS.—The Secretary of Defense
may prescribe professional certification and credential
standards for professional accounting positions within the
282
HR 4546 PCS
Department of Defense. Any such standard shall be pre-
scribed as a Department of Defense regulation.
‘‘(b) WAIVER
AUTHORITY.—The Secretary may
waive any standard prescribed under subsection (a) when-
ever the Secretary determines such a waiver to be appro-
priate.
‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.—A standard prescribed under
subsection (a) shall not apply to any person employed by
the Department of Defense before the standard is pre-
scribed.
‘‘(d) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall sub-
mit to Congress a report on the Secretary’s plans to pro-
vide training to appropriate Department of Defense per-
sonnel to meet any new professional and credential stand-
ards prescribed under subsection (a). Such report shall be
prepared in conjunction with the Director of the Office
of Personnel Management. Such a report shall be sub-
mitted not later than one year after the effective date of
any regulations, or any revision to regulations, prescribed
pursuant to subsection (a).
‘‘(e) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘profes-
sional accounting position’ means a position or group of
positions in the GS–510, GS–511, and GS–505 series that
involves professional accounting work.’’.
283
HR 4546 PCS
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such
chapter is amended by adding at the end the following
new item:
‘‘1599d. Professional accounting positions: authority to establish certification
and credential standards.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Standards established pur-
suant to section 1599d of title 10, United States Code,
as added by subsection (a), may take effect no sooner than
120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING
TO OTHER NATIONS
SEC. 1201. SUPPORT OF UNITED NATIONS-SPONSORED EF-
FORTS TO INSPECT AND MONITOR IRAQI
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
(a) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF ASSISTANCE IN FIS-
CAL YEAR 2003.—The total amount of the assistance for
fiscal year 2003 that is provided by the Secretary of De-
fense under section 1505 of the Weapons of Mass Destruc-
tion Control Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5859a) as activities
of the Department of Defense in support of activities
under that Act may not exceed $15,000,000.
(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSIST-
ANCE.—Subsection (f) of section 1505 of the Weapons of
Mass Destruction Control Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5859a)
is amended by striking ‘‘2002’’ and inserting ‘‘2003’’.
284
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1202. STRENGTHENING THE DEFENSE OF TAIWAN.
(a) IMPLEMENTATION
OF TRAINING PLAN.—Not
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a com-
prehensive plan to conduct joint operational training for,
and exchanges of senior officers between, the Armed
Forces of the United States and the military forces of Tai-
wan. Such plan shall include implementation of a wide
range of programs, activities, exercises, and arrangements
focused on threat analysis, military doctrine, force plan-
ning, logistical support, intelligence collection and anal-
ysis, operational tactics, techniques, and procedures, civil-
military relations, and other subjects designed to improve
the defensive capabilities of Taiwan and to enhance inter-
operability between the military forces of Taiwan and the
Armed Forces of the United States.
(b) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—At least 30 days be-
fore commencing implementation of the plan described in
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit the
plan to Congress, in classified and unclassified form as
necessary.
SEC. 1203. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND SUPPORT FOR
FOREIGN LIAISON OFFICERS.
(a) AUTHORITY.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new section:
285
HR 4546 PCS
‘‘§ 2350m. Administrative services and support for
foreign liaison officers
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND SUP-
PORT.—The Secretary of Defense may provide administra-
tive services and support for foreign liaison officers per-
forming duties while such officers temporarily are as-
signed to components or commands of the armed forces.
Such administrative services and support may include base
or installation operation support services, office space,
utilities, copying services, fire and police protection, and
computer support. The Secretary may provide such ad-
ministrative services and support with or without reim-
bursement, as the Secretary considers appropriate.
‘‘(b) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORITY.—The authority
under this section shall expire on September 30, 2005.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding
at the end the following new item:
‘‘2350m. Administrative services and support for foreign liaison officers.’’.
(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2005, the
Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Represent-
atives a report describing, as of the date of submission
of the report—
(1) the number of foreign liaison officers for
which support has been provided under section
286
HR 4546 PCS
2350m of title 10, United States Code (as added by
subsection (a));
(2) the countries from which such foreign liai-
son officers are or were assigned;
(3) the type of support provided, the duration
for which the support was provided, and the reasons
the support was provided; and
(4) the costs to the Department of Defense and
the United States of providing such support.
SEC. 1204. ADDITIONAL COUNTRIES COVERED BY LOAN
GUARANTEE PROGRAM.
Section 2540 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
‘‘(5) A country that, as determined by the Sec-
retary of Defense in consultation with the Secretary
of State, assists in combatting drug trafficking orga-
nizations or foreign terrorist organizations.’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(d) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of State, whenever the Secretaries consider such
action to be warranted, shall jointly submit to the Com-
mittees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the
287
HR 4546 PCS
Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Inter-
national Relations of the House of Representatives a re-
port enumerating those countries to be added or removed
under subsection (b).’’.
SEC. 1205. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR JOINT DATA EX-
CHANGE CENTER IN MOSCOW.
(a) LIMITATION.—Not more than 50 percent of the
funds made available to the Department of Defense for
fiscal year 2003 for activities associated with the Joint
Data Exchange Center in Moscow, Russia, may be obli-
gated or expended for any such activity until—
(1) the United States and the Russian Federa-
tion enter into a cost-sharing agreement as described
in subsection (d) of section 1231 of the Floyd D.
Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law
106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–329);
(2) the United States and the Russian Federa-
tion enter into an agreement or agreements exempt-
ing the United States and any United States person
from Russian taxes, and from liability under Rus-
sian laws, with respect to activities associated with
the Joint Data Exchange Center;
(3) the Secretary of Defense submits to the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the
288
HR 4546 PCS
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Rep-
resentatives a copy of each agreement referred to in
paragraphs (1) and (2); and
(4) a period of 30 days has expired after the
date of the final submission under paragraph (3).
(b) JOINT DATA EXCHANGE CENTER.—For purposes
of this section, the term ‘‘Joint Data Exchange Center’’
means the United States-Russian Federation joint center
for the exchange of data to provide early warning of
launches of ballistic missiles and for notification of such
launches that is provided for in a joint United States-Rus-
sian Federation memorandum of agreement signed in
Moscow in June 2000.
SEC. 1206. LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MILITARY PER-
SONNEL IN COLOMBIA.
(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds available to the
Department of Defense may be used to support or main-
tain more than 500 members of the Armed Forces on duty
in the Republic of Colombia at any time.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—There shall be excluded from
counting for the purposes of the limitation in subsection
(a) the following:
(1) A member of the Armed Forces in the Re-
public of Colombia for the purpose of rescuing or re-
trieving United States military or civilian Govern-
289
HR 4546 PCS
ment personnel, except that the period for which
such a member may be so excluded may not exceed
30 days unless expressly authorized by law.
(2) A member of the Armed Forces assigned to
the United States Embassy in Colombia as an
attache´, as a member of the security assistance of-
fice, or as a member of the Marine Corps security
contingent.
(3) A member of the Armed Forces in Colombia
to participate in relief efforts in responding to a nat-
ural disaster.
(4) Nonoperational transient military personnel.
(5) A member of the Armed Forces making a
port call from a military vessel in Colombia.
(c) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive
the limitation in subsection (a) if he determines that such
waiver is in the national security interest.
(d) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall notify the
congressional defense committees not later 15 days after
the date of the exercise of the waiver authority under sub-
section (c).
290
HR 4546 PCS
TITLE 
XIII—COOPERATIVE
THREAT 
REDUCTION 
WITH
STATES OF THE FORMER SO-
VIET UNION
SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.
(a) SPECIFICATION OF CTR PROGRAMS.—For pur-
poses of section 301 and other provisions of this Act, Co-
operative Threat Reduction programs are the programs
specified in section 1501(b) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–
201; 110 Stat. 2731; 50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(b) FISCAL YEAR 2003 COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION FUNDS DEFINED.—As used in this title, the
term ‘‘fiscal year 2003 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds’’ means the funds appropriated pursuant to the au-
thorization of appropriations in section 301 for Coopera-
tive Threat Reduction programs.
(c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be
available for obligation for three fiscal years.
SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.
(a) FUNDING
FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—Of the
$416,700,000 authorized to be appropriated to the De-
291
HR 4546 PCS
partment of Defense for fiscal year 2003 in section
301(23) for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the
following amounts may be obligated for the purposes spec-
ified:
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination in
Russia, $70,500,000.
(2) For strategic nuclear arms elimination in
Ukraine, $6,500,000.
(3) For nuclear weapons transportation security
in Russia, $19,700,000.
(4) For nuclear weapons storage security in
Russia, $39,900,000.
(5) For activities designated as Other Assess-
ments/Administrative Support, $14,700,000.
(6) 
For 
defense 
and 
military 
contacts,
$18,900,000.
(7) For weapons of mass destruction infrastruc-
ture 
elimination 
activities 
in 
Kazakhstan,
$9,000,000.
(8) For weapons of mass destruction infrastruc-
ture elimination activities in Ukraine, $8,800,000.
(9) For chemical weapons destruction in Rus-
sia, $50,000,000.
292
HR 4546 PCS
(10) For biological weapons facility dismantle-
ment in the States of the former Soviet Union
$11,500,000.
(11) For biological weapons facility security and
safety in the States of the former Soviet Union,
$34,800,000.
(12) For biological weapons collaborative re-
search in the States of the former Soviet Union,
$8,700,000.
(13) For personnel reliability programs in Rus-
sia, $100,000.
(14) For weapons of mass destruction prolifera-
tion prevention in the States of the former Soviet
Union, $40,000,000.
(b) ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED FOR CERTAIN
PURPOSES.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2003 in sec-
tion 301(23) for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs,
$83,600,000 may be obligated for any of the purposes
specified in paragraphs (1) through (4) and (9) of sub-
section (a) in addition to the amounts specifically author-
ized in such paragraphs.
(c) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS FOR OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2003 Co-
operative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or ex-
293
HR 4546 PCS
pended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in para-
graphs (1) through (14) of subsection (a) until 30 days
after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to
Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will
be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be
obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence
shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expend-
iture of fiscal year 2003 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expendi-
ture of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title
or any other provision of law.
(d) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO VARY INDIVIDUAL
AMOUNTS.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), in any
case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that
it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Sec-
retary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year
2003 for a purpose listed in any of the paragraphs in sub-
section (a) in excess of the amount specifically authorized
for such purpose (including amounts authorized under
subsection (b)).
(2) An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in
any of the paragraphs in subsection (a) in excess of the
specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made
using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after—
294
HR 4546 PCS
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notifica-
tion of the intent to do so together with a complete
discussion of the justification for doing so; and
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of
the notification.
(3) The Secretary may not, under the authority pro-
vided in paragraph (1), obligate amounts for the purposes
stated any of paragraphs (5) through (13) of subsection
(a) in excess of 115 percent of the amount specifically au-
thorized for such purposes.
SEC. 1303. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS UNTIL
SUBMISSION OF REPORTS.
No fiscal year 2003 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds may be obligated or expended until 30 days after
the date of the submission of—
(1) the report required to be submitted in fiscal
year 2002 under section 1308(a) of the Floyd D.
Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law
106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–341); and
(2) the update for the multiyear plan required
to be submitted for fiscal year 2001 under section
1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 22 U.S.C.
5952 note).
295
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1304. REPORT ON USE OF REVENUE GENERATED BY
ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT UNDER COOPERA-
TIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS.
Section 1308(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted
into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–341)
is amended by inserting at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(6) To the maximum extent practicable, a de-
scription of how revenue generated by activities car-
ried out under Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams in recipient States is being utilized, mon-
itored, and accounted for.’’.
SEC. 1305. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR SEC-
OND WING OF FISSILE MATERIAL STORAGE
FACILITY.
No funds authorized to be appropriated for Coopera-
tive Threat Reduction programs for any fiscal year may
be used for the design, planning, or construction of a sec-
ond wing for a storage facility for Russian fissile material.
SEC. 1306. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT REQUIRE-
MENT REGARDING RUSSIAN PROLIFERATION
TO IRAN.
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that—
296
HR 4546 PCS
(1) Russian proliferation to Iran constitutes a
clear threat to the national security and vital inter-
ests of the United States and undermines the pur-
pose and goals of Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams;
(2) such proliferation consists primarily of nu-
clear and missile technology, goods, and know-how,
and dual-use items that could contribute to the de-
velopment of weapons of mass destruction and bal-
listic missiles;
(3) because of ongoing Russian assistance, the
intelligence community estimates that Iran could at-
tempt to launch an intercontinental ballistic missile
by 2005, and could possess a nuclear weapon by
2010;
(4) Russian proliferation is providing Iran with
the capability to strike United States military forces,
interests, allies, and friends in the region with weap-
ons-of-mass-destruction-tipped ballistic missiles;
(5) the issue of Russian proliferation to Iran
has been raised by United States officials at the
highest levels of the Russian Government;
(6) Iran has long been identified as a State
sponsor of terrorism by the United States because of
its support of foreign terrorist organizations, and
297
HR 4546 PCS
the combination of terrorist organizations and weap-
ons of mass destruction constitutes a grave threat to
the national security of the United States;
(7) Russian proliferation to Iran raises serious
questions regarding the intentions of the Russian
Government, and its commitment to nonproliferation
and improved relations with the United States;
(8) Russian proliferation to Iran could under-
mine Congressional support for Cooperative Threat
Reduction programs; and
(9) the President must safeguard United States
national security and demonstrate United States re-
solve and commitment to stopping the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles
through clear, firm, and coherent policies and strate-
gies that employ the full range of diplomatic and
economic tools at his disposal, both positive and neg-
ative, to halt the serious and continuing problem of
Russian proliferation.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than March 15 of 2003
through 2009, the President shall submit to Congress a
report (in unclassified and classified form as necessary)
describing in detail Russian proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction and ballistic missile goods, technology,
and know-how, and of dual-use items that may contribute
298
HR 4546 PCS
to the development of weapons of mass destruction and
ballistic missiles, to Iran and to other countries during the
year preceding the year in which the report is submitted.
The report shall include—
(1) a net assessment prepared by the Office of
Net Assessment of the Department of Defense; and
(2) a detailed description of the following:
(A) The number, type, and quality of di-
rect and dual-use weapons of mass destruction
and ballistic missile goods, items, and tech-
nology being transferred.
(B) The form, location, and manner in
which such transfers take place.
(C) The contribution that such transfers
could make to the recipient States’ weapons of
mass destruction and ballistic missile programs,
and how soon such States will test, possess, and
deploy weapons of mass destruction and bal-
listic missiles.
(D) The impact that such transfers have,
or could have, on United States national secu-
rity, on regional friends, allies, and interests,
and on United States military forces deployed
in the region to which such transfers are being
made.
299
HR 4546 PCS
(E) The actions being taken by the United
States to counter and defend against capabili-
ties developed by the recipient States as a re-
sult of such transfers.
(F) The strategy, plan, or policy incor-
porating the full range of policy tools available
that the President intends to employ to halt
Russian proliferation, the rationale for employ-
ing such tools, and the timeline by which the
President expects to see material progress in
ending Russian proliferation of direct and dual-
use weapons of mass destruction and missile
goods, technologies, and know-how.
SEC. 1307. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF COOPERATIVE
THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS OUTSIDE THE
STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
No Cooperative Threat Reduction funds authorized
or appropriated for any fiscal year may be used for threat
reduction projects, programs, or activities in countries
other than the States of the former Soviet Union.
SEC. 1308. LIMITED WAIVER OF RESTRICTION ON USE OF
FUNDS.
(a) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—(1) The restriction de-
scribed in subsection (d)(5) of section 1203 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
300
HR 4546 PCS
(Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1779; 22 U.S.C. 5952)
shall not apply with respect to United States assistance
to Russia if the President submits to Congress a written
certification that waiving the restriction is important to
the national security interests of the United States.
(2) The authority under paragraph (1) shall expire
on December 31, 2005.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date
that the President applies the waiver authority under sub-
section (a), the President shall submit to Congress a re-
port (in classified and unclassified form as necessary)
describing—
(1) the arms control agreements with which
Russia is not committed to complying, the form or
forms of noncommittal, and detailed evidence of
such noncommittal;
(2) why use of the waiver of authority was im-
portant to protect national security interests; and
(3) a strategy, plan, or policy incorporating the
full range of policy tools available to the President
for promoting Russian commitment to, and compli-
ance with, all relevant arms control agreements.
301
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 1309. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS UNTIL SUBMIS-
SION OF REPORT ON DEFENSE AND MILI-
TARY CONTACTS ACTIVITIES.
Not more than 50 percent of fiscal year 2003 Cooper-
ative Threat Reduction Funds may be obligated or ex-
pended for defense and military contacts activities until
the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report de-
scribing in detail the operation and success of such activi-
ties carried out under Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams during fiscal years 2001 and 2002. Such report
shall include a description of—
(1) the amounts obligated or expended for such
activities;
(2) the purposes, goals, and objectives for which
such amounts were obligated and expended;
(3) a description of the activities carried out,
including the forms of assistance provided, and the
justification for each form of assistance provided;
(4) the success of each activity, including the
goals and objectives achieved for each;
(5) a description of participation by private sec-
tor entities in the United States in carrying out such
activities, and the participation of any other Federal
department or agency in such activities; and
(6) any other information that the Secretary
considers relevant to provide a complete description
302
HR 4546 PCS
of the operation and success of activities carried out
under Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
TITLE XIV—UTAH TEST AND
TRAINING RANGE
SEC. 1401. DEFINITION OF UTAH TEST AND TRAINING
RANGE.
In this title, the term ‘‘Utah Test and Training
Range’’ means those portions of the military operating
area of the Utah Test and Training Area located solely
in the State of Utah. The term includes the Dugway Prov-
ing Ground.
SEC. 1402. MILITARY OPERATIONS AND OVERFLIGHTS AT
UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:
(1) The testing and development of military
weapons systems and the training of military forces
are critical to ensuring the national security of the
United States.
(2) The Utah Test and Training Range is a
unique and irreplaceable national asset at the core
of the test and training mission of the Department
of Defense.
(3) Areas designated as wilderness study areas
are located near lands withdrawn for military use
and are beneath special use airspace critical to the
303
HR 4546 PCS
support of military test and training missions at the
Utah Test and Training Range.
(4) Continued unrestricted access to the special
use airspace and lands that comprise the Utah Test
and Training Range is a national security priority
and is not incompatible with the protection and
proper management of the natural, environmental,
cultural, and other resources of such lands.
(b) OVERFLIGHTS.—(1) Nothing in this title, the
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), or other land
management laws generally applicable to federally des-
ignated wilderness areas or wilderness study areas in the
Utah Test and Training Range shall restrict or preclude
low-level overflights, low-level military overflights and op-
erations of military aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial
vehicles, military overflights or military overflights and op-
erations that can be seen or heard within those areas.
(2) Paragraph (1) precludes any restriction regarding
altitude or airspeed, noise level, supersonic flight, route
of flight, time of flight, seasonal usage, or numbers of
flights of any military aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aer-
ial vehicles, missiles, aerospace vehicles, and other military
weapons systems over federally designated wilderness
areas or wilderness study areas in the Utah Test and
Training Range.
304
HR 4546 PCS
(3) In this subsection, the term ‘‘low-level’’ includes
any flight down to and including 10 feet above ground
level.
(c) 
SPECIAL
USE
AIRSPACE
AND
TRAINING
ROUTES.—Nothing in this title, the Wilderness Act, or
other land management laws generally applicable to feder-
ally designated wilderness areas or wilderness study areas
in the Utah Test and Training Range shall restrict or pre-
clude the designation of new units of special use airspace,
the expansion of existing units of special use airspace, or
the use or establishment of military training routes over
federally designated wilderness areas or wilderness study
areas in the Utah Test and Training Range.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS AND TRACKING SYSTEMS.—
Nothing in this title, the Wilderness Act, or other land
management laws generally applicable to federally des-
ignated wilderness areas or wilderness study areas in the
Utah Test and Training Range shall be construed to re-
quire the removal of existing communications, instrumen-
tation, or electronic tracking systems from these areas, to
prevent any required maintenance of such systems, or to
prevent the installation of new communication, instrumen-
tation, or other equipment necessary for effective testing
and training to meet military requirements so long as the
installation and maintenance of such systems do not re-
305
HR 4546 PCS
quire construction of any permanent roads in any federally
designated wilderness area or wilderness study area.
(e) EMERGENCY ACCESS AND RESPONSE.—(1) Noth-
ing in this title, the Wilderness Act, or other land manage-
ment laws generally applicable to federally designated wil-
derness areas or wilderness study areas in the Utah Test
and Training Range shall restrict or preclude timely ac-
cess to any area necessary to respond to emergency situa-
tions. Immediate access, including access for emergency
and rescue vehicles and equipment, shall not be restricted
if human life or health may be in jeopardy.
(2) Not later than 120 days after the date of the en-
actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force and
the Secretary of Interior shall enter into a memorandum
of understanding providing formal procedures for access
to the federally designated wilderness areas or wilderness
study areas that are located beneath airspace of the Utah
Test and Training Range, which may be necessary to re-
spond to emergency situations, to rescue downed aircrew
members, to investigate accident locations, to recover mili-
tary aircraft or other weapons systems, and to restore ac-
cident locations. Military operations in the Utah Test and
Training Range shall not be limited or restricted in any
way pending completion of the memorandum of under-
standing.
306
HR 4546 PCS
(f) CONTROL
OR RESTRICTION
OF PUBLIC AC-
CESS.—(1) When required by national security or public
safety, public access to federally designated wilderness
areas or wilderness study areas in the Utah Test and
Training Range that are located beneath airspace des-
ignated as special use airspace may be controlled, re-
stricted, or prohibited entirely. Such controls, restrictions,
or prohibitions shall remain in force for the minimum du-
ration necessary. The Secretary of the Air Force shall pro-
vide advance notice of such controls, restrictions, or prohi-
bitions to the Secretary of the Interior.
(2) Not later than 120 days after the date of the en-
actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force and
the Secretary of Interior shall enter into a memorandum
of understanding prescribing procedures for implementing
access controls, restrictions, or prohibitions. Military oper-
ations in the Utah Test and Training Range shall not be
limited or restricted in any way pending completion of the
memorandum of understanding.
SEC. 1403. DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LANDS IN
UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE.
(a) DESIGNATION.—The following Federal lands that
are in the Utah Test and Training Range are hereby des-
ignated as wilderness:
307
HR 4546 PCS
(1) Those lands that were managed pursuant to
the nonimpairment standard set forth in section
603(c) of Public Law 94–579 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c))
on or before January 1, 1991.
(2) Those lands that were acquired by the
United States through donation, exchange, or other
method of acquisition and—
(A) are located entirely within the areas
identified in paragraph (1); or
(B) are located within a logical extension
of the boundaries of the areas identified in
paragraph (1).
(b) PLANNING PROCESS FOR FEDERAL LANDS IN
UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE.—(1) The Secretary
of the Interior shall not continue the plan amendment
process initiated pursuant to section 202 of Public Law
94–579 (43 U.S.C. 1712) and published in the Federal
Register on March 18, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 13439), for
Federal lands located in the Utah Test and Training
Range.
(2) The Secretary of the Interior shall not develop,
maintain, or revise land use plans pursuant to section 202
of Public Law 94–579 (43 U.S.C. 1712) for Federal lands
located in the Utah Test and Training Range without the
prior concurrence of the Secretary of the Air Force and
308
HR 4546 PCS
the Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State
of Utah.
(c) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights,
the Federal lands in the areas designated as wilderness
by this title are hereby withdrawn from all forms of entry,
appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws, from
location, entry, and patent under the United States min-
ing laws, and from disposition under all laws pertaining
to mineral and geothermal leasing, and mineral materials,
and all amendments to such laws.
(d) WATER.—Nothing in this title or any action
taken pursuant to this title shall constitute an express or
implied reservation of surface or groundwater by any per-
son, including the United States. Nothing in this title af-
fects any valid existing water rights in existence before
the date of the enactment of this Act, including any water
rights held by the United States. If the United States de-
termines that additional water resources are needed for
the purposes of this title, the United States shall acquire
such rights in accordance with the water laws of the State
of Utah.
(e) MAP AND DESCRIPTION.—(1) As soon as prac-
ticable after the date of the enactment of this title, the
Secretary of Interior shall transmit a map and legal de-
scription of the areas designated as wilderness by this title
309
HR 4546 PCS
to the Committee on Resources of the House of Represent-
atives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Re-
sources of the Senate.
(2) The map and legal description shall have the
same force and effect as if included in this title, except
that the Secretary of Interior may correct clerical and ty-
pographical errors in the map and legal description.
(3) The map and legal description shall be on file and
available for public inspection in the office of the Director
of the Bureau of Land Management and the office of the
State Director of the Bureau of Land Management in the
State of Utah.
(f) ADMINISTRATION.—(1) Subject to valid existing
rights and this title, the areas designated as wilderness
in this title shall be administered by the Secretary of Inte-
rior in accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness
Act, except that any reference in such provisions to the
effective date of the Wilderness Act (or any similar ref-
erence) shall be deemed to be a reference to the date of
the enactment of this Act.
(2) Any lands or interest in lands within the bound-
aries of an area designated as wilderness by this title that
is acquired by the United States after the date of the en-
actment of this Act shall be added to and administered
310
HR 4546 PCS
as part of the wilderness area within which the acquired
lands or interest in lands are located.
(3) The Secretary of the Interior may offer to acquire
lands and interest in lands located within the areas des-
ignated as wilderness by this title. Such lands may be ac-
quired at fair market value under this subsection by pur-
chase from willing sellers, by exchange for lands of ap-
proximately equal value, or by donation.
(4) In furtherance of the purposes and principles of
the Wilderness Act, management activities to maintain or
restore fish and wildlife populations and the habitats to
support such populations may be carried out within the
areas designated as wilderness by this title where con-
sistent with relevant wilderness management plans, in ac-
cordance with appropriate policies and guidelines such as
those set forth in appendix B of the Report of the Com-
mittee on Interior and Insular Affairs to accompany H.R.
2570 of the 101st Congress (H. Rept. 101–405).
(5) Within the areas designated as wilderness by this
title, the grazing of livestock, where established before the
date of the enactment of this Act, shall be permitted to
continue subject to such reasonable regulations, policies,
and practices as the Secretary of the Interior considers
necessary, as long as such regulations, policies, and prac-
tices fully conform with and implement the intent of Con-
311
HR 4546 PCS
gress regarding grazing in such areas, as such intent is
expressed in the Wilderness Act, section 101(f) of Public
Law 101–628, and House Report 101–405, Appendix A.
(6) Congress does not intend for the designation of
the wilderness in this title to lead to the creation of protec-
tive perimeters or buffer zones around any area designated
as wilderness by this title. The fact that nonwilderness ac-
tivities or uses can be seen or heard within the areas des-
ignated as wilderness by this title shall not, of itself, pre-
clude such activities or uses up to the boundary of that
wilderness.
(7) Until completion of a full revision of the Pony
Express Area Resource Management Plan, dated January
12, 1990, by the Salt Lake Field Office of the Bureau
of Land Management, the Secretary of Interior shall not
grant or issue any authorizations pursuant to section
501(a)(6) of Public Law 94–579 (43 U.S.C. 1761(a)(6))
upon Federal lands identified as inventory units UTU-
020-088, UTU-020-095, UTU-020-096, and UTU-020-
100, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Wilder-
ness Inventory, State of Utah’’, dated August 1979.
SEC. 1404. DESIGNATION OF PILOT RANGE WILDERNESS.
Certain Federal lands in Box Elder County, Utah,
as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Pilot Range
Wilderness’’, and dated October 1, 2001, are hereby des-
312
HR 4546 PCS
ignated as wilderness, and shall be known as the Pilot
Range Wilderness Area.
SEC. 1405. DESIGNATION OF CEDAR MOUNTAIN WILDER-
NESS.
Certain Federal lands in Tooele County, Utah, as
generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Cedar Mountain
Wilderness’’, and dated May 1, 2002, are hereby des-
ignated as wilderness, and shall be known as the Cedar
Mountain Wilderness Area.
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003’’.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
313
HR 4546 PCS
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ........................
Anniston Army Depot ......................
$1,900,000
Fort Rucker .....................................
$3,050,000
Redstone Arsenal .............................
$1,950,000
Alaska ...........................
Fort Wainwright ..............................
$111,010,000
Arizona ..........................
Fort Huachuca .................................
$10,400,000
Yuma Proving Ground .....................
$4,500,000
Arkansas .......................
Pine Bluff Arsenal ...........................
$18,937,000
California ......................
Monterey Defense Language Insti-
tute ...............................................
$1,500,000
Colorado ........................
Fort Carson .....................................
$5,350,000
District of Columbia .....
Walter Reed Army Medical Center ..
$9,950,000
Georgia ..........................
Fort Benning ...................................
$74,250,000
Fort 
Stewart/Hunter 
Army 
Air
Field .............................................
$26,000,000
Hawaii ...........................
Schofield Barracks ...........................
$191,000,000
Kansas ..........................
Fort Leavenworth ............................
$3,150,000
Fort Riley .........................................
$51,950,000
Kentucky .......................
Blue Grass Army Depot ..................
$5,500,000
Fort Campbell ..................................
$106,300,000
Louisiana ......................
Fort Polk .........................................
$31,000,000
Maryland .......................
Fort Detrick .....................................
$22,500,000
Massachusetts ...............
Natick Research Development and
Engineering Center ......................
$4,100,000
Missouri ........................
Fort Leonard Wood .........................
$15,500,000
New Jersey ....................
Picatinny Arsenal .............................
$7,500,000
New York ......................
Fort Drum .......................................
$18,300,000
North Carolina ..............
Fort Bragg .......................................
$94,900,000
Pennsylvania .................
Letterkenny Army Depot .................
$1,550,000
Texas .............................
Fort Bliss .........................................
$10,200,000
Fort Hood ........................................
$85,000,000
Virginia .........................
Fort Lee ...........................................
$5,200,000
Washington ...................
Fort Lewis .......................................
$53,800,000
Total .........................................
$976,247,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Belgium ................................
Supreme Headquarters, Allied Pow-
ers Europe ...................................
$13,600,000
Germany ...............................
Area Support Group, Bamberg ......
$17,200,000
Campbell Barracks .........................
$8,300,000
Coleman Barracks ..........................
$1,350,000
314
HR 4546 PCS
Army: Outside the United States—Continued
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Darmstadt .......................................
$3,500,000
Grafenwoehr ....................................
$69,866,000
Landstuhl ........................................
$2,400,000
Mannheim .......................................
$42,000,000
Schweinfurt .....................................
$2,000,000
Italy ......................................
Vicenza ............................................
$34,700,000
Korea ....................................
Camp Carroll ..................................
$20,000,000
Camp Castle ....................................
$6,800,000
Camp Hovey ...................................
$25,000,000
Camp Humphreys ...........................
$36,000,000
Camp Henry ...................................
$10,000,000
K16 Airfield ....................................
$40,000,000
Yongsan ..........................................
$12,600,000
Total ...............................................
$345,316,000
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using the amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(3), the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installation and location, and in the
amount, set forth in the following table:
Army: Unspecified Worldwide
Location
Installation
Amount
Unspecified Worldwide .........
Unspecified Worldwide ...................
$4,000,000
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
installations, for the purposes, and in the amounts set
forth in the following table:
315
HR 4546 PCS
Army: Family Housing
State or Country
Installation or loca-
tion
Purpose
Amount
Alaska ...........................
Fort Wainwright .........
38 Units ..........
$17,752,000
Arizona .........................
Yuma Proving Ground
33 Units ..........
$6,100,000
Germany .......................
Stuttgart .....................
1 Unit ..............
$990,000
Korea ............................
Yongsan .......................
10 Units ..........
$3,100,000
Total: ...................
$27,942,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not
to exceed $15,653,000.
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(6)(A),
the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military
family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$234,831,000.
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 2002, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of the
Army in the total amount of $2,935,609,000 as follows:
316
HR 4546 PCS
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2101(a),
$803,247,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2101(b),
$345,316,000.
(3) For military construction projects at un-
specified worldwide locations authorized by section
2101(c), $4,000,000.
(4) For unspecified minor construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, $21,550,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $158,796,000.
(6) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $278,426,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including the functions described in section
2833 of title 10, United States Code),
$1,122,274,000.
(7) For the construction of phase 3 of a bar-
racks complex, Butner Road, at Fort Bragg, North
317
HR 4546 PCS
Carolina, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2001 (division B of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, as
enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat.
1654A–389), $50,000,000.
(8) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex, D Street, at Fort Richardson, Alas-
ka, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002
(division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat.
1280), $21,000,000.
(9) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex, Nelson Boulevard, at Fort Carson,
Colorado, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat.
1280), as amended by section 2105 of this Act,
$42,000,000.
(10) For the construction of phase 2 of a basic
combat trainee complex at Fort Jackson, South
Carolina, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat.
318
HR 4546 PCS
1280), as amended by section 2105 of this Act,
$39,000,000.
(11) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex, 17th and B Streets at Fort Lewis,
Washington, authorized by section 2101(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115
Stat. 1280), $50,000,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act
may not exceed—
(1) the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of sub-
section (a);
(2) $18,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a
barracks complex, Main Post, at Fort Benning,
Georgia);
(3) $100,000,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2101(a) for construction of
a barracks complex, Capron Avenue, at Schofield
Barracks, Hawaii);
319
HR 4546 PCS
(4) $50,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a
barracks complex, Range Road, at Fort Campbell,
Kentucky); and
(5) $5,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for a military con-
struction project at Fort Bliss, Texas).
(c) ADJUSTMENT.—The total amount authorized to
be appropriated pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (11)
of subsection (a) is the sum of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated in such paragraphs, reduced by
$13,676,000, which represents the combination of savings
resulting from adjustments to foreign currency exchange
rates for military construction, military family housing
construction, and military family housing support outside
the United States and savings resulting from favorable
bids, reduced overhead charges, and cancellations due to
force structure changes.
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2002 PROJECTS.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2101(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107-107; 115 Stat.
1281) is amended—
320
HR 4546 PCS
(1) in the item relating to Fort Carson, Colo-
rado, by striking ‘‘$66,000,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$67,000,000’’; and
(2) in the item relating to Fort Jackson, South
Carolina, by striking ‘‘$65,650,000’’ in the amount
column and inserting ‘‘$68,650,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2104(b)
of that Act (115 Stat. 1284) is amended—
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(3), 
by 
striking
‘‘$41,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$42,000,000’’; and
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(4), 
by 
striking
‘‘$36,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$39,000,000’’.
TITLE XXII—NAVY
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Arizona ..........................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma ...........
$3,000,000
California ......................
Auxiliary Landing Field, San Diego
(San Clemente Island) ........................
$6,150,000
Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Cen-
ter, Twentynine Palms .......................
$40,870,000
321
HR 4546 PCS
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pen-
dleton ..................................................
$31,930,000
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar ......
$12,210,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ....
$64,040,000
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow ..
$4,450,000
Naval Air Station, Lemoore ...................
$35,855,000
Naval Air Warfare Center, Point Mugu,
San Nicholas Island ............................
$6,760,000
Naval Air Weapons Station, China Lake
$10,100,000
Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey
$9,020,000
Naval Station, San Diego .......................
$12,210,000
Connecticut ...................
Naval Submarine Base, New London ....
$7,880,000
District of Columbia .....
Marine Corps Barracks ..........................
$3,700,000
Naval District, Washington ....................
$2,690,000
Florida ..........................
Naval Air Base, Jacksonville ..................
$13,342,000
Naval Air Station, Pensacola .................
$990,000
Naval School Explosive Ordinance De-
tachment, Eglin ..................................
$6,350,000
Naval Station, Mayport ..........................
$1,900,000
Whiting Field .........................................
$1,780,000
Georgia ..........................
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay ........
$1,580,000
Hawaii ...........................
Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor ...............
$18,500,000
Naval Station, Pearl Harbor ..................
$14,690,000
Illinois ...........................
Naval Training Center, Great Lakes .....
$93,190,000
Indiana ..........................
Crane Naval Surface Weapons Station ..
$11,610,000
Maine ............................
Naval Shipyard, Kittery-Portsmouth .....
$15,200,000
Maryland .......................
Naval Air Facility, Andrews Air Force
Base ....................................................
$9,680,000
United States Naval Academy ...............
$1,800,000
Mississippi .....................
Naval Air Station, Meridian ...................
$2,850,000
Naval Construction Battalion Center,
Gulfport ..............................................
$5,460,000
Naval Station, Pascagoula .....................
$16,160,000
Nevada ..........................
Naval Air Station, Fallon .......................
$4,010,000
New Jersey ....................
Naval Weapons Center, Lakehurst ........
$5,200,000
Naval Weapons Station Earle, Colts
Neck ....................................................
$5,600,000
North Carolina ..............
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point
$10,470,000
Marine Corps Air Station, New River ....
$6,920,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune .......
$9,570,000
Rhode Island .................
Naval Station, Newport ..........................
$6,870,000
South Carolina ..............
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ......
$13,700,000
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Is-
land .....................................................
$10,490,000
Naval Weapons Station, Charlestown ....
$5,740,000
Texas .............................
Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi ..........
$7,150,000
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base,
Fort Worth .........................................
$8,850,000
Naval Air Station, Kingsville .................
$6,210,000
Virginia .........................
Dam Neck Fleet Combat Training Cen-
ter, Atlantic ........................................
$3,900,000
Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base .....
$9,770,000
Marine Corps Combat Development
Command, Quantico ...........................
$24,864,000
Naval Air Station Oceana ......................
$16,490,000
Naval Shipyard, Norfolk, Portsmouth ...
$19,660,000
Naval Station, Norfolk ...........................
$171,505,000
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahl-
gren .....................................................
$15,830,000
Naval Weapons Station, Yorktown ........
$15,020,000
Washington ...................
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ........
$17,580,000
Keyport Naval Undersea Warfare Com-
mand ...................................................
$10,500,000
322
HR 4546 PCS
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
Naval Magazine, Indian Island ..............
$4,030,000
Naval Station, Bremerton ......................
$45,870,000
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor .............
$22,310,000
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Brem-
erton ....................................................
$57,132,000
Strategic Weapons Facility, Bangor ......
$7,340,000
Various Locations .........
Host Nation Infrastructure ....................
$1,000,000
Total ...............................................
$1,009,528,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the locations outside the United States, and
in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Bahrain ..........................
Naval Support Activity, Bahrain ............
$25,970,000
Diego Garcia ..................
Diego Garcia, Naval Support Facility .....
$11,090,000
Greece .............................
Naval Support Activity, Joint Head-
quarters Command, Larissa ................
$14,800,000
Guam ..............................
Commander, 
United 
States 
Naval
Forces, Guam ......................................
$13,400,000
Iceland ............................
Naval Air Station, Keflavik .....................
$14,920,000
Italy ................................
Naval Air Station, Sigonella ...................
$55,660,000
Total ................................................
$135,840,000
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
installations, for the purposes, and in the amounts set
forth in the following table:
323
HR 4546 PCS
Navy: Family Housing
State or Country
Installation or loca-
tion
Purpose
Amount
California ................
Naval Air Station,
Lemoore ...................
178 Units ........
$40,981,000
Marine Corps Air-
Ground Combat Cen-
ter, Twentynine
Palms .......................
76 Units ..........
$19,425,000
Connecticut .............
Naval Submarine Base,
New London .............
100 Units ........
$24,415,000
Florida ....................
Naval Station, Mayport
1 Unit ..............
$329,000
Hawaii .....................
Marine Corps Base,
Kaneohe Bay ............
65 Units ..........
$24,797,000
Maine ......................
Naval Air Station,
Brunswick ................
26 Units ..........
$5,800,000
Mississippi ...............
Naval Air Station, Me-
ridian ........................
56 Units ..........
$9,755,000
North Carolina ........
Marine Corps Base,
Camp LeJeune .........
317 Units ........
$43,650,000
Virginia ...................
Marine Corps Base,
Quantico ...................
290 Units ........
$41,843,000
United Kingdom ....
Joint Maritime Facility,
St. Mawgan ..............
62 Units ..........
$18,524,000
Total ........
$229,519,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriation in
section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $11,281,000.
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A),
the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military
324
HR 4546 PCS
family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$136,816,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 2002, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of the
Navy in the total amount of $2,308,007,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2201(a),
$776,806,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2201(b),
$133,270,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, $23,262,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $95,745,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $377,616,000.
325
HR 4546 PCS
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833
of title 10, United States Code), $867,788,000.
(6) For replacement of a pier at Naval Station,
Norfolk, Virginia, authorized in section 2201(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107;
115 Stat. 1287), as amended by section 2205 of this
Act, $33,520,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act
may not exceed—
(1) the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(a);
(2) $48,120,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a bachelors en-
listed quarters shipboard ashore, Naval Station,
Norfolk, Virginia); and
(3) $2,570,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(b) for a quality of life
support facility, Naval Air Station Sigonella, Italy).
326
HR 4546 PCS
(c) ADJUSTMENT.—The total amount authorized to
be appropriated pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (6)
of subsection (a) is the sum of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated in such paragraphs, reduced by
$1,340,000, which represents the combination of savings
resulting from adjustments to foreign currency exchange
rates for military construction, military family housing
construction, and military family housing support outside
the United States and savings resulting from favorable
bids, reduced overhead charges, and cancellations due to
force structure changes.
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2002 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2201(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat.
1286) is amended—
(1) in the item relating to Naval Station, Nor-
folk, Virginia, by striking ‘‘$139,270,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$139,550,000’’; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting
‘‘$1,059,030,000’’.
327
HR 4546 PCS
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2204(b)(2)
of that Act (115 Stat. 1289) is amended by striking
‘‘$33,240,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$33,520,000’’.
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ................................
Maxwell Air Force Base ...................
$8,000,000
Alaska ...................................
Clear Air Station ..............................
$14,400,000
Eielson Air Force Base ....................
$21,600,000
Arizona ..................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ........
$19,270,000
Luke Air Force Base ........................
$13,000,000
Arkansas ...............................
Little Rock Air Force Base ..............
$25,600,000
California ..............................
Beale Air Force Base .......................
$11,740,000
Travis Air Force Base ......................
$9,600,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base .............
$10,500,000
Colorado ................................
Buckley Air National Guard Base ...
$17,700,000
Peterson Air Force Base ..................
$2,000,000
Schriever Air Force Base .................
$5,700,000
United States Air Force Academy ...
$9,400,000
District of Columbia .............
Bolling Air Force Base .....................
$1,500,000
Florida ..................................
Elgin Air Force Base .......................
$4,250,000
Hurlburt Field ..................................
$15,000,000
McDill Air Force Base .....................
$21,000,000
Tyndall Air Force Base ....................
$8,100,000
Georgia ..................................
Robins Air Force Base .....................
$5,400,000
Hawaii ...................................
Hickam Air Force Base ...................
$1,350,000
Kansas ..................................
McConnell Air Force Base ...............
$7,500,000
Louisiana ..............................
Barksdale Air Force Base ................
$10,900,000
Maryland ...............................
Andrews Air Force Base ..................
$9,600,000
Massachusetts .......................
Hanscom Air Force Base .................
$7,700,000
Mississippi .............................
Keesler Air Force Base ....................
$22,000,000
Nevada ..................................
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$37,350,000
New Jersey ............................
McGuire Air Force Base ..................
$24,631,000
New Mexico ...........................
Cannon Air Force Base ....................
$4,650,000
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$4,650,000
328
HR 4546 PCS
Air Force: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$21,900,000
North Carolina ......................
Pope Air Force Base ........................
$9,700,000
Ohio .......................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ....
$25,000,000
Oklahoma ..............................
Tinker Air Force Base .....................
$7,500,000
South Carolina ......................
Shaw Air Force Base .......................
$6,800,000
Texas .....................................
Lackland Air Force Base .................
$37,300,000
Laughlin Air Force Base ..................
$8,000,000
Sheppard Air Force Base .................
$24,000,000
Utah ......................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$14,500,000
Virginia .................................
Langley Air Force Base ...................
$71,940,000
Total .................................................
$580,731,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Air Force: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Diego Garcia .........................
Diego Garcia .....................................
$17,100,000
Germany ................................
Ramstein Air Force Base .................
$71,783,000
Guam .....................................
Andersen Air Force Base .................
$31,000,000
Italy .......................................
Aviano Air Force Base .....................
$6,600,000
Japan ....................................
Kadena Air Force Base ....................
$6,000,000
Korea .....................................
Osan Air Base ..................................
$15,100,000
Spain .....................................
Naval Station, Rota ..........................
$31,818,000
Turkey ...................................
Incirlik Air Force Base ....................
$1,550,000
United Kingdom ....................
Royal Air Force, Fairford ................
$19,000,000
Royal Air Force, Lakenheath ...........
$13,400,000
Wake Island ..........................
Wake Island ......................................
$24,900,000
Total .........................................
$238,251,000
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using the amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(3), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
329
HR 4546 PCS
tion projects for the installation and location, and in the
amount, set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Unspecified Worldwide
Location
Installation
Amount
Unspecified Worldwide ..........
Classified Location ...........................
$32,562,000
Total .........................................
$32,562,000
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the
Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units
(including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
installations, for the purposes, and in the amounts set
forth in the following table:
Air Force: Family Housing
State or Country
Installation or loca-
tion
Purpose
Amount
Arizona .........................
Luke Air Force Base ..
140 Units ........
$18,954,000
California ......................
Travis Air Force Base
110 Units ........
$24,320,000
Colorado .......................
Peterson Air Force
Base .........................
2 Units ............
$959,000
United States Air
Force Academy ........
71 Units ..........
$12,424,000
Delaware .......................
Dover Air Force Base
112 Units ........
$19,615,000
Florida ..........................
Eglin Air Force Base ..
Housing Office
$597,000
Eglin Air Force Base ..
134 Units ........
$15,906,000
MacDill Air Force
Base .........................
96 Units ..........
$18,086,000
Hawaii ..........................
Hickam Air Force
Base .........................
96 Units ..........
$29,050,000
Idaho ............................
Mountain Home Air
Force Base ..............
95 Units ..........
$24,392,000
Kansas ..........................
McConnell Air Force
Base .........................
Housing Main-
tenance Fa-
cility .............
$1,514,000
Maryland ......................
Andrews Air Force
Base .........................
53 Units ..........
$9,838,000
Andrews Air Force
Base .........................
52 Units ..........
$8,807,000
Mississippi ....................
Columbus Air Force
Base .........................
Housing Office
$412,000
Keesler Air Force Base
117 Units ........
$16,505,000
Missouri ........................
Whiteman Air Force
Base .........................
97 Units ..........
$17,107,000
330
HR 4546 PCS
Air Force: Family Housing—Continued
State or Country
Installation or loca-
tion
Purpose
Amount
Montana .......................
Malmstrom Air Force
Base .........................
18 Units ..........
$4,717,000
New Mexico ..................
Holloman Air Force
Base .........................
101 Units ........
$20,161,000
North Carolina .............
Pope Air Force Base ...
Housing Main-
tenance Fa-
cility .............
$991,000
Seymour Johnson Air
Force Base ..............
126 Units ........
$18,615,000
North Dakota ...............
Grand Forks Air Force
Base .........................
150 Units ........
$30,140,000
Minot Air Force Base
112 Units ........
$21,428,000
Minot Air Force Base
102 Units ........
$20,315,000
Oklahoma .....................
Vance Air Force Base
59 Units ..........
$11,423,000
South Dakota ...............
Ellsworth Air Force
Base .........................
Housing Main-
tenance Fa-
cility .............
$447,000
Ellsworth Air Force
Base .........................
22 Units ..........
$4,794,000
Texas ............................
Dyess Air Force Base
85 Units ..........
$14,824,000
Randolph Air Force
Base .........................
Housing Main-
tenance Fa-
cility .............
$447,000
Randolph Air Force
Base .........................
112 Units ........
$14,311,000
Virginia .........................
Langley Air Force
Base .........................
Housing Office
$1,193,000
Germany .......................
Ramstein Air Force
Base .........................
19 Units ..........
$8,534,000
Korea ............................
Osan Air Base .............
113 Units ........
$35,705,000
Osan Air Base .............
Housing Supply
Warehouse ...
$834,000
United Kingdom ...........
Royal Air Force,
Lakenheath ..............
Housing Office
and Mainte-
nance Facil-
ity ................
$2,203,000
Total ............................
$429,568,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $34,188,000.
331
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, Unites States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A),
the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing mili-
tary family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$217,286,000.
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR
FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 2002, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of the
Air Force in the total amount of $2,495,094,000, as fol-
lows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2301(a),
$580,731,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2301(b),
$238,251,000.
(3) For the military construction projects at
unspecified worldwide locations authorized by section
2301(c), $32,562,000.
332
HR 4546 PCS
(4) For unspecified minor construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, $11,500,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $76,958,000.
(6) For military housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $681,042,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833
of title 10, United States Code), $874,050,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of subsection
(a).
(c) ADJUSTMENT.—The total amount authorized to
be appropriated pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (6)
of subsection (a) is the sum of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated in such paragraphs, reduced by
333
HR 4546 PCS
$10,281,000, which represents the combination of savings
resulting from adjustments to foreign currency exchange
rates for military construction, military family housing
construction, and military family housing support outside
the United States and savings resulting from favorable
bids, reduced overhead charges, and cancellations due to
force structure changes.
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE
AGENCIES
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2404(a)(1), the Secretary of Defense may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Missile Defense Agency .........
Kauai, Hawaii ...................................
$23,400,000
Defense Intelligence Agency
Bolling Air Force Base, District of
Columbia .......................................
$121,958,000
Defense Logistics Agency .....
Columbus, Ohio ................................
$5,021,000
Defense Supply Center, Richmond,
Virginia .........................................
$5,500,000
Naval Air Station, New Orleans,
Louisiana ......................................
$9,500,000
Travis Air Force Base, California ....
$16,000,000
Defense Threat Reduction
Agency ...............................
Fort Belvoir, Virginia .......................
$76,388,000
Department of Defense De-
pendents Schools ...............
Fort Bragg, North Carolina .............
$2,036,000
Fort Jackson, South Carolina ..........
$2,506,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina ..............................
$12,138,000
334
HR 4546 PCS
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Marine Corps Base, Quantico, Vir-
ginia ..............................................
$1,418,000
United States Military Academy,
West Point, New York ..................
$4,347,000
Fort Meade, Maryland .....................
$4,484,000
Joint Chiefs of Staff .............
Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado ..
$18,400,000
National Security Agency .....
Fort Bragg, North Carolina .............
$30,800,000
Special Operations Command
Hurlburt Field, Florida ....................
$11,100,000
Naval 
Amphibious 
Base, 
Little
Creek, Virginia .............................
$14,300,000
TRICARE Management Ac-
tivity ..................................
Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska ..
$10,400,000
Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii ......
$2,700,000
Total .........................................
$372,396,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2404(a)(2), the Secretary of Defense may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations and locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Defense Logistics Agency .....
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam .....
$17,586,000
Naval 
Forces 
Marianas 
Islands,
Guam ............................................
$6,000,000
Naval Station, Rota, Spain ..............
$23,400,000
Royal Air Force, Fairford, United
Kingdom .......................................
$17,000,000
Yokota Air Base, Japan ...................
$23,000,000
Department of Defense De-
pendents Schools ...............
Kaiserslautern, Germany ..................
$957,000
Lajes Field, Azores, Portugal ..........
$1,192,000
Seoul, Korea .....................................
$31,683,000
Supreme Headquarters, Allied Pow-
ers Europe, Belgium .....................
$1,573,000
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany ....
$997,000
Vicenza, Italy ....................................
$2,117,000
TRICARE Management Ac-
tivity ..................................
Naval 
Support 
Activity, 
Naples,
Italy ..............................................
$41,449,000
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany ....
$39,629,000
Total .........................................
$206,583,000
335
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 2402. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2404(a)(8)(A),
the Secretary of Defense may improve existing military
family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$5,530,000.
SEC. 2403. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2404(a)(4), the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation
projects under section 2865 of title 10, United States
Code, in the amount of $49,531,000.
SEC. 2404. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DE-
FENSE AGENCIES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 2002, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of
Defense (other than the military departments) in the total
amount of $1,417,779,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2401(a),
$335,796,000.
336
HR 4546 PCS
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2401(b),
$206,583,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$16,293,000.
(4) For contingency construction projects of the
Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10,
United States Code, $10,000,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $45,432,000.
(6) For energy conservation projects authorized
by section 2403 of this Act, $49,531,000.
(7) For base closure and realignment activities
as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Re-
alignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of
Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note),
$545,138,000.
(8) For military family housing functions:
(A) For improvement of military family
housing and facilities, $5,480,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833
of title 10, United States Code), $42,432,000.
337
HR 4546 PCS
(C) For credit to the Department of De-
fense Housing Improvement Fund established
by section 2883(a) of title 10, United States
Code, as amended by section 2801 of this Act,
$2,000,000.
(9) For payment of a claim against the Hos-
pital Replacement project at Elmendorf Air Force
Base, Alaska, $10,400,000.
(10) For the construction of phase 4 of an am-
munition demilitarization facility at Pueblo Chemical
Activity, Colorado, authorized by section 2401(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 104–201;
110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 2406 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113
Stat. 
839) 
and 
section 
2407 
of 
this 
Act,
$38,000,000.
(11) For the construction of phase 5 of an am-
munition demilitarization facility at Newport Army
Depot, Indiana, authorized by section 2401(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1999 (division B of Public Law 105–261; 112
Stat. 2193), as amended by section 2406 of this Act,
$61,494,000.
338
HR 4546 PCS
(12) For the construction of phase 5 of an am-
munition demilitarization facility at Aberdeen Prov-
ing Ground, Maryland, authorized by section
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (division B of Public Law
105–261; 112 Stat. 2193), as amended by section
2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–
107; 115 Stat. 1299), $30,600,000.
(13) For the construction of phase 3 of an am-
munition demilitarization facility at Blue Grass
Army Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law
106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section
2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–
107; 115 Stat. 1298) and section 2405 of this Act,
$10,300,000.
(14) For the construction of phase 3 of an am-
munition demilitarization support facility at Blue
Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law
106–65; 113 Stat. 835), $8,300,000.
339
HR 4546 PCS
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act
may not exceed—
(1) the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(a); and
(2) $26,200,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2401(a) for the construction
of the Defense Threat Reduction Center, Fort
Belvoir, Virginia).
(c) ADJUSTMENT.—The total amount authorized to
be appropriated pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (14)
of subsection (a) is the sum of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated in such paragraphs, reduced by
$42,833,000, which represents the combination of savings
resulting from adjustments to foreign currency exchange
rates for military construction, military family housing
construction, and military family housing support outside
the United States and savings resulting from favorable
bids, reduced overhead charges, and cancellations due to
force structure changes.
340
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 2405. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat.
835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division
B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), is further
amended—
(1) under the agency heading relating to Chem-
ical Demilitarization, in the item relating to Blue
Grass 
Army 
Depot, 
Kentucky, 
by 
striking
‘‘$254,030,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$290,325,000’’; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting
‘‘$748,245,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2405(b)(3)
of that Act (113 Stat. 839), as so amended, is further
amended by striking ‘‘$231,230,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$267,525,000’’.
SEC. 2406. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 1999 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1999 (division B of Public Law 105–261; 112 Stat.
341
HR 4546 PCS
2193), as amended by section 2406 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division
B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1299), is amended—
(1) under the agency heading relating to Chem-
ical Demilitarization, in the item relating to Newport
Army Depot, Indiana, by striking ‘‘$191,550,000’’
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting
‘‘$293,853,000’’; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting
‘‘$829,919,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2404(b)(2)
of that Act (112 Stat. 2196) is amended by striking
‘‘$162,050,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$264,353,000’’.
SEC. 2407. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 1997 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat.
2775), as amended by section 2406 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division
B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), is further
amended—
(1) under the agency heading relating to Chem-
ical Demilitarization Program, in the item relating
342
HR 4546 PCS
to Pueblo Chemical Activity, Colorado, by striking
‘‘$203,500,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$261,000,000’’; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting
‘‘$607,454,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2406(b)(2)
of that Act (110 Stat. 2779), as so amended, is further
amended by striking ‘‘$203,500,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$261,000,000’’.
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC
TREATY ORGANIZATION SE-
CURITY 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment program as provided in section 2806 of title 10,
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of con-
struction previously financed by the United States.
343
HR 4546 PCS
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2002, for con-
tributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806
of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United
States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment program authorized by
section 2501, in the amount of $168,200,000.
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED GUARD AND RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
2002, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engi-
neering services, and construction of facilities for the
Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions there
for, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code
(including the cost of acquisition of land for those facili-
ties), the following amounts:
(1) For the Department of the Army—
(A) for the Army National Guard of the
United States, $170,793,000; and
(B) for the Army Reserve, $86,789,000.
(2) For the Department of the Navy, for the
Naval and Marine Corps Reserve, $66,971,000.
344
HR 4546 PCS
(3) For the Department of the Air Force—
(A) for the Air National Guard of the
United States, $119,266,000; and
(B) 
for 
the 
Air 
Force 
Reserve,
$68,576,000.
TITLE XXVII—EXPIRATION AND
EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZA-
TIONS
SEC. 
2701. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY
LAW.
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVI for military
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall ex-
pire on the later of—
(1) October 1, 2005; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2006.
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to
authorizations for military construction projects, land ac-
345
HR 4546 PCS
quisition, family housing projects, and facilities, and con-
tributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
curity Investment program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor) for which appropriated funds have been
obligated before the later of—
(1) October 1, 2005; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
ized funds for fiscal year 2005 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment program.
SEC. 2702. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.—Notwith-
standing section 2701 of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public
Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 841), authorizations set forth in
the tables in subsection (b), as provided in section 2302
or 2601 of that Act, shall remain in effect until October
1, 2003, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2004,
whichever is later.
(b) TABLES.—The tables referred to in subsection (a)
are as follows:
364
HR 4546 PCS
Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949
(40 U.S.C. 471, et seq.).
‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS.—The conveyance of sur-
plus real property under subsection (a) may be made to
any of the following:
‘‘(1) A State or political subdivision of a State.
‘‘(2) A nonprofit organization that exists for
the primary purpose of conservation of natural re-
sources on real property.
‘‘(c) REVISIONARY INTEREST AND OTHER DEED RE-
QUIREMENTS.—(1) The deed of conveyance of any surplus
real property conveyed under subsection (a) disposed of
under this subsection shall require the property to be used
and maintained for the conservation of natural resources
in perpetuity. If the Secretary of the military department
that made the conveyance determines at any time that the
property is not being used or maintained for such purpose,
then, at the option of the Secretary, all or any portion
of the property shall revert to the United States.
‘‘(2) The deed of conveyance may permit the recipient
of the property—
‘‘(A) to convey the property to another eligible
entity described in subsection (b), subject to the ap-
proval of the Secretary of the military department