datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3326
To extend the King Range National Conservation Area boundary in the 
State of California to include the Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 
Creek Forests. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 16, 2003
Mr. THOMPSON of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To extend the King Range National Conservation Area 
boundary in the State of California to include the Mill 
Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian Creek Forests.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘King Range National 
Conservation Area Boundary Extension Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following: 
(1) The public lands within the King Range 
National Conservation Area, California, are a unique
public resource encompassing a spectacular meeting 
of land and sea. 
(2) The Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 
Creek Forests are located adjacent to the King 
Range National Conservation Area and have long 
been recognized as critical components of the 
Mattole River watershed. 
(3) The Mill Creek Forest comprises approxi-
mately 2,514 acres of public land, the Squaw Creek 
Forest comprises approximately 400 acres of public 
land, and the Indian Creek Forest comprises ap-
proximately 304 acres of public land. Each of the 
forests is administered by the Bureau of Land Man-
agement, and contains significant stands of old-
growth Douglas fir that support habitat for threat-
ened species and endangered species, including the 
northern spotted owl, red-tailed frog, and Olympic 
salamander. 
(4) The linkage of the Mill Creek, Squaw 
Creek, and Indian Creek Forests to the King Range 
National Conservation Area will enhance outdoor 
recreational opportunities in the northern portion of 
the King Range and the coastal section of the 
Mattole River.
(5) Extending the King Range boundary to in-
clude the Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 
Creek Forests will also enhance management of the 
natural resources of the area by connecting the 
headwaters of Mill Creek to the Mattole River. 
SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVA-
TION AREA BOUNDARY. 
Section 9 of the Act of October 21, 1970 (84 Stat. 
1067), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(d) In addition to the lands described in subsections 
(a) and (c), there are hereby added to the King Range 
National Conservation Area the lands identified as the 
Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian Creek proposed ex-
tensions on the map entitled ‘King Range National Con-
servation Area Boundary Extension Act of 2003’, dated 
October 2, 2003.’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 332
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study certain sites in the historic 
district of Beaufort, South Carolina, relating to the Reconstruction Era 
to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating the study area 
as a unit of the National Park System. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 8, 2003
Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study certain 
sites in the historic district of Beaufort, South Carolina, 
relating to the Reconstruction Era to assess the suit-
ability and feasibility of designating the study area as 
a unit of the National Park System.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Reconstruc-
tion Study Area Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following:
(1) The Reconstruction Era, during which Con-
gress adopted the 13th amendment ending slavery, 
the 14th amendment guaranteeing civil rights, and 
the 15th amendment guaranteeing voting rights to 
all citizens of the United States, saw the occurrence 
of a transforming series of events in the history of 
the United States. 
(2) Beaufort, South Carolina, and the sur-
rounding sea islands—
(A) contain significant historical and ar-
chaeological sites associated with the Recon-
struction Era; and 
(B) offer a unique opportunity for pre-
serving and interpreting the Reconstruction 
Era. 
(3) The first African-Americans to hear the 
reading of Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Procla-
mation assembled on January 1, 1863, at the Old 
Fort Plantation on the Beaufort River in the State 
of South Carolina. 
(4) The Penn School, a national historic land-
mark located on St. Helena Island, South Caro-
lina—
‘‘§ 220503. Purposes 
‘‘The purposes of this corporation are—
‘‘(1) to exercise exclusive jurisdiction directly or 
through constituent members or committees, over—
‘‘(A) all matters pertaining to the United 
States participation in the Olympic Games, the 
Paralympic Games, and the Pan American 
Games, including representation of the United 
States in such games; and 
‘‘(B) the organization of the Olympic 
Games, the Paralympic Games, and the Pan 
American Games when held in the United 
States; 
‘‘(2) to obtain for the United States, directly or 
by delegation to the appropriate national governing 
body or paralympic sports organization, the most 
competent amateur representation possible in each 
event of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, 
and the Pan American Games; 
‘‘(3) to provide for swift resolution of conflicts 
or disputes involving amateur athletes, national gov-
erning bodies, paralympic sports organizations, and 
amateur sports organizations, and protect the oppor-
tunity of any amateur athlete, coach, trainer, man-
ager, administrator, or official to participate in ama-
teur competition; and
(A) was the first educational experiment of 
the Reconstruction Era and the eventual end of 
chattel slavery; and 
(B) remains 1 of the most significant Afri-
can-American cultural and educational institu-
tions in the United States. 
(5) The Freedmen’s Bureau, located in the re-
stored Beaufort College, served as the chief policy 
arm of the Federal Government for matters related 
to emancipated slaves during the Reconstruction 
Era. 
(6) Beaufort County, South Carolina, and the 
surrounding sea islands have many other noteworthy 
historic buildings and archaeological sites, includ-
ing—
(A) buildings and sites associated with 
Robert Smalls, a former slave who—
(i) became a hero to the Union cause 
when he and several slaves seized control 
of the armed Confederate ship on which 
they served and then turned the ship over 
to the Union navy; and 
(ii) represented the State of South 
Carolina in the House of Representatives 
during the Reconstruction Era;
(B) the first Freedmen’s Village of 
Mitchellville on Hilton Head Island, South 
Carolina; 
(C) Camp Sexton, the site of the first Afri-
can-American regiment mustered in the United 
States Army; and 
(D) Penn School and Beaufort College. 
(7) The National Park System does not have a 
park or historic site that focuses primarily on the 
preservation and interpretation of the Reconstruc-
tion Era. 
(8) The Reconstruction Era was a period of 
deep cultural, political, and economic division in the 
United States, and it is necessary to better under-
stand this complex period of history and the con-
tinuing impact of this period on the United States. 
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di-
rector of the National Park Service. 
(2) STUDY AREA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 
means the area comprised of historical sites in
the historic district of Beaufort, South Caro-
lina, relating to the Reconstruction Era. 
(B) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 
includes the following: 
(i) The Penn School. 
(ii) The Old Fort Plantation on the 
Beaufort River. 
(iii) The Freedmen’s Bureau in Beau-
fort College. 
(iv) The First Freedmen’s Village of 
Mitchellville on Hilton Head Island. 
(v) Various historic buildings and ar-
chaeological sites associated with Robert 
Smalls. 
(vi) The Beaufort Arsenal. 
(vii) other significant sites relating to 
the Reconstruction Era. 
SEC. 4. STUDY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall complete a 
study of the study area to assess the suitability and feasi-
bility of designating the study area as a unit of the Na-
tional Park System. 
(b) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 
subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with Pub-
lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.).
SEC. 5. REPORT. 
As soon as practicable after the study under section 
4 is completed, the Secretary shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Resources of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 
Senate a report that describes the findings of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Sec-
retary.
Æ
debt counseling, debt consolidation, or debt settle-
ment service for which the organization charges the 
consumer or receives consideration from a third 
party (including a related party); or 
‘‘(5) engage in any unfair or deceptive act or 
practice in connection with any debt counseling, debt 
consolidation, or debt settlement service provided to 
any consumer, in offering or establishing any term 
or condition in any contract with a consumer for 
providing any such service, or any advertisement or 
solicitation relating to any such service. 
‘‘(b) UNDISCLOSED
RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN
A 
DEBT COUNSELING ORGANIZATION AND A DEBT CON-
SOLIDATION OR DEBT SETTLEMENT ORGANIZATION.—No 
debt counseling organization may offer any service to any 
consumer, or provide any advice or referral to any con-
sumer, with respect to any debt consolidation organization 
or any debt settlement organization of which the debt 
counseling organization is an affiliate, for which it is an 
agent, or with which the debt counseling organization has 
an on-going business relationship or any reciprocal refer-
ral agreement, unless the debt counseling organization—
‘‘(1) fully discloses, orally and in writing, the 
existence of the affiliation, agency, or business rela-
(6) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘corpora-
tion’’ and inserting ‘‘chief executive officer, with the 
consent of the Board,’’; 
(7) in paragraph (2)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘cor-
poration’s executive committee by either the corpora-
tion’s executive director’’ and inserting ‘‘chief execu-
tive officer’’; and 
(8) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii), by striking ‘‘cor-
poration’s executive committee’’ and inserting ‘‘chief 
executive officer and Board’’. 
SEC. 6. REPORTING. 
(a) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 220512 of title 36, 
United States Code, (as amended by this Act) is amend-
ed—
(1) by striking ‘‘every fourth’’ and inserting 
‘‘each’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting ‘‘year’’; 
and 
(3) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘such 4-year 
period’’ and inserting ‘‘the preceding year’’. 
(b) SPECIAL REPORT.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the corporation shall not be required to 
submit to Congress any additional report, other than a 
report required by section 220512 of title 36, United
States Code, (as amended by this Act) until 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 7. CONFORMING AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS. 
Chapter 2205 of title 36, United States Code, (as 
amended by this Act) is amended—
(1) in section 220501, by moving paragraph (7) 
2 ems to the right; 
(2) in section 220504, by striking ‘‘constitution 
and’’ both places it appears; 
(3) in section 220506—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(i) in the subsection heading, by strik-
ing ‘‘CONSTITUTION AND’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘constitution and’’; 
and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘may amend its con-
stitution’’ and inserting ‘‘may amend its 
bylaws’’; 
(B) in subsection (b)(9), by striking ‘‘this 
Act’’ and inserting ‘‘this chapter’’; and 
(C) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ‘‘con-
stitution and’’; 
(4) in section 220507(d)—
(A) by moving paragraph (3) 2 ems to the 
left; and
(B) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘sub-
sections’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection’’; 
(5) in section 220510—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘con-
stitution and’’ each place it appears; and 
(B) in subsection (b)(1)(A)—
(i) by striking ‘‘constitution and’’ both 
places it appears; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘a paralympic sports 
organizations’’ and inserting ‘‘paralympic 
sports organizations’’; 
(6) in section 220513, by striking ‘‘Corpora-
tion’’ and inserting ‘‘corporation’’; 
(7) in section 220521, by striking ‘‘subsections 
(a) or (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a) or (b)’’; 
(8) in section 220522(a)(4)(B), by striking 
‘‘constitution and’’; and 
(9) in section 220529, by striking ‘‘constitution 
and’’ both places it appears.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3341
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 
the Comptroller General of the United States annually to report on 
whether amounts appropriated to carry out the grant programs author-
ized under such Act are adequate to permit grant recipients to meet 
the conditions imposed by receipt of the grant. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 20, 2003
Mr. ALLEN (for himself, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. MOORE, Mr. 
CASE, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FROST, Mr. ETHERIDGE, 
and Mr. HOEFFEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 to require the Comptroller General of the United 
States annually to report on whether amounts appro-
priated to carry out the grant programs authorized under 
such Act are adequate to permit grant recipients to 
meet the conditions imposed by receipt of the grant.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adequate Yearly Fed-
eral Funding Report Act’’.
‘‘(ii) specifies the date of the last inspec-
tion and describes the actions that have been 
and will be taken to ensure compliance of the 
underground storage tank listed under clause 
(i) with this subtitle. 
‘‘(B) An underground storage tank described in 
this subparagraph is an underground storage tank 
that is—
‘‘(i) regulated under this subtitle; and 
‘‘(ii) owned or operated by the Federal, 
State, or local government. 
‘‘(C) The Administrator shall make each report, 
received under subparagraph (A), available to the 
public through an appropriate media. 
‘‘(2) FINANCIAL
INCENTIVE.—The Adminis-
trator may award to a State that develops a report 
described in paragraph (1), in addition to any other 
funds that the State is entitled to receive under this 
subtitle, not more than $50,000, to be used to carry 
out the report.
‘‘(3) NOT A SAFE HARBOR.—This subsection 
does not relieve any person from any obligation or 
requirement under this subtitle.’’.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3333
To exempt certain coastal barrier areas in Florida from limitations on Federal 
expenditures and financial assistance under the Coastal Barriers Re-
sources Act, and limitations on flood insurance coverage under the Na-
tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 17, 2003
Mr. BOYD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
committee concerned 
A BILL 
To exempt certain coastal barrier areas in Florida from 
limitations on Federal expenditures and financial assist-
ance under the Coastal Barriers Resources Act, and limi-
tations on flood insurance coverage under the National 
Flood Insurance Act of 1968.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM LIMITATIONS ON FEDERAL 
EXPENDITURES, 
FINANCIAL 
ASSISTANCE, 
AND FLOOD INSURANCE. 
Section 5(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 
U.S.C. 3504(a)) and the limitations on flood insurance 
coverage in section 1321(a) of the National Flood Insur-
ance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4028(a)) shall not apply to 
any area located in Coastal Barrier Resources System unit 
P30 or FL–92 in Gulf County, Florida, as such units are 
depicted on the maps referred to in section 4(a) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)).
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3334
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the design and 
construction of the Riverside-Corona Feeder in cooperation with the 
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside, California. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 17, 2003
Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate 
in the design and construction of the Riverside-Corona 
Feeder in cooperation with the Western Municipal Water 
District of Riverside, California.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Riverside-Corona 
Feeder Authorization Act’’.
SEC. 2. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERSIDE-
CORONA FEEDER. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, in 
cooperation with the Western Municipal Water District, 
may participate in a project to design and construct a 
water supply project, the Riverside-Corona Feeder, which 
includes 20 ground water wells and 28 miles of pipeline 
in western Riverside County, California. 
(b) AGREEMENTS
AND REGULATIONS.—The Sec-
retary may enter into such agreements and promulgate 
such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. 
(c) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 
to design and construct the project described in subsection 
(a) shall not exceed greater of—
(1) 35 percent of the total cost of the project; 
or 
(2) $50,000,000. 
(d) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 
under this section shall not be used for operation or main-
tenance of the project described in subsection (a).
Æ
IB 
Union Calendar No. 387
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3334
[Report No. 108–643] 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the design and 
construction of the Riverside-Corona Feeder in cooperation with the 
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside, California. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 17, 2003
Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004
Additional sponsors: Mr. LEWIS of California and Mr. ISSA 
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on October 17, 2003] 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate 
in the design and construction of the Riverside-Corona 
Feeder in cooperation with the Western Municipal Water 
District of Riverside, California.
(5) The cost of the Federal grazing program in 
Arizona greatly exceeds revenues to the Federal 
treasury from grazing fee receipts. 
(6) Many grazing permittees and lessees in Ari-
zona have indicated their willingness to end livestock 
grazing on their Federal grazing allotments in ex-
change for a one-time payment to reasonably com-
pensate them for the effort and investment that they 
have made in such allotments. 
(7) A broad coalition of ranchers and environ-
mental and conservation groups in Arizona have 
agreed that a voluntary program to buyout grazing 
permits and leases would provide the best solution to 
the aforementioned problems. 
(8) Compensating grazing permittees and les-
sees to end livestock grazing on Federal lands would 
help recapitalize an ailing sector of rural Arizona by 
providing economic options to grazing permittees 
and lessees that do not presently exist, thus allowing 
them to restructure their grazing operations or start 
new businesses. 
(9) Reasonable compensation will help alleviate 
the need for grazing permittees and lessees to sell or 
subdivide their private lands.
134
‘‘
9902.04.16
2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 
acid, 
4-
amino-3-[[4-[[-4-[(2- or 4-amino-4 or 
2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]phenyl]amino]-
3-sulfophenyl]azo]-5-hydroxy-6-
(phenylazo), trisodium salt) (CAS 
No. 85631–88–5) (provided for in 
subheading 3204.14.30) ....................
Free 
No change 
No change 
On or before 
12/31/2006
’’. 
SEC. 3381. FAST BLACK 287 NA PASTE. 
Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting 
in numerical sequence the following new heading:
‘‘
9902.04.17
1,3-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 5-[[4-
[(7-amino-1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-2-
naphthalenyl)azo]-1-
naphthalenyl]azo]-, trisodium salt, in 
paste form (provided for in sub-
heading 3204.14.30) ..........................
Free 
No change 
No change 
On or before 
12/31/2006
’’. 
SEC. 3382. FAST BLACK 287 NA LIQUID FEED. 
Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting 
in numerical sequence the following new heading:
‘‘
9902.04.18
1,3-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 5-[[4-
[(7-amino-1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-2-
naphthalenyl)azo]-1-
naphthalenyl]azo]-, trisodium salt, in 
liquid form (provided for in sub-
heading 3204.14.30) ..........................
Free 
No change 
No change 
On or before 
12/31/2006
’’. 
SEC. 3383. FAST YELLOW 2 STAGE. 
Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting 
in numerical sequence the following new heading:
‘‘
9902.04.19
1,3-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 5,5′- 
[[6-(4-morpholinyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-
diyl]bis(imino-4,1-phenyleneazo)]bis-, 
ammonium/sodium/hydrogen salt (di-
rect yellow 173) (provided for in ei-
ther 
subheading 
3204.14.30 
or 
3215.19.00.) ......................................
Free 
No change 
No change 
On or before 
12/31/2006
’’. 
SEC. 3384. CYAN 1 STAGE. 
Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting 
in numerical sequence the following new heading:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3336
To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy production tax 
practices. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 17, 2003
Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the juris-
diction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy 
production tax practices.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ENERGY PRODUCTION INCENTIVES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—A State may provide to any enti-
ty—
(1) a credit against any tax or fee owed to the 
State under a State law, or 
(2) any other tax incentive,
determined by the State to be appropriate, in the amount 
calculated under and in accordance with a formula deter-
mined by the State, for production described in subsection 
(b) in the State by the entity that receives such credit or 
such incentive. 
(b) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—Subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to the production in the State of—
(1) electricity from coal mined in the State and 
used in a facility, if such production meets all appli-
cable Federal and State laws and if such facility 
uses scrubbers or other forms of clean coal tech-
nology, 
(2) electricity from a renewable source such as 
wind, solar, or biomass, or 
(3) ethanol. 
SEC. 2. EFFECT ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE. 
Any action taken by a State in accordance with this 
Act with respect to a tax or fee payable, or incentive appli-
cable, for any period beginning after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act shall—
(1) be considered to be a reasonable regulation 
of commerce, and 
(2) not be considered to impose an undue bur-
den on interstate commerce or to otherwise impair,
restrain, or discriminate, against interstate com-
merce.
Æ