H. Con. Res. 288—4
other agreement under this section shall be credited to the appro-
priation accounts from which the costs incurred by the United
States in providing such test facility were paid.
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) The term ‘direct cost’, with respect to the use of a
test facility pursuant to a memorandum or other agreement
under subsection (a)—
‘‘(A) means any item of cost that is easily and readily
identified to a specific unit of work or output within the
test facility where the use occurred, that would not have
been incurred if such use had not occurred; and
‘‘(B) may include costs of labor, materials, facilities,
utilities, equipment, supplies, and any other resources of
the test facility that are consumed or damaged in connec-
tion with—
‘‘(i) the use; or
‘‘(ii) the maintenance of the test facility for pur-
poses of the use.
‘‘(2) The term ‘indirect cost’, with respect to the use of
a test facility pursuant to a memorandum or other agreement
under subsection (a)—
‘‘(A) means any item of cost that is not easily and
readily identified to a specific unit of work or output within
the test facility where the use occurred; and
‘‘(B) may include general and administrative expenses
for such activities as supporting base operations, manufac-
turing, supervision, procurement of office supplies, and
utilities that are accumulated costs allocated among several
users.
‘‘(3) The term ‘test facility’ means a range or other facility
at which testing of defense equipment may be carried out.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
‘‘2350l. Cooperative agreements for reciprocal use of test facilities: foreign countries
and international organizations.’’.
SEC. 
1214. 
SENSE 
OF 
CONGRESS 
ON 
ALLIED 
DEFENSE
BURDENSHARING.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the efforts of the President to increase defense
burdensharing by allied and friendly nations deserve strong
support; and
(2) host nation support agreements with those nations in
which United States military personnel are assigned to perma-
nent duty ashore should be negotiated consistent with section
1221(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 50 U.S.C. 1541(a)(1)), which
sets forth a goal of obtaining from any such host nation financial
contributions that amount to 75 percent of the nonpersonnel
costs incurred by the United States Government for stationing
United States military personnel in that nation.
H. Con. Res. 288—5
Subtitle C—Reports
SEC. 1221. REPORT ON SIGNIFICANT SALES AND TRANSFERS OF MILI-
TARY HARDWARE, EXPERTISE, AND TECHNOLOGY TO
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.
Section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C.
113 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(d) REPORT ON SIGNIFICANT SALES AND TRANSFERS TO CHINA.—
(1) The report to be submitted under this section not later than
March 1, 2002, shall include in a separate section a report
describing any significant sale or transfer of military hardware,
expertise, and technology to the People’s Republic of China. The
report shall set forth the history of such sales and transfers since
1995, forecast possible future sales and transfers, and address
the implications of those sales and transfers for the security of
the United States and its friends and allies in Asia.
‘‘(2) The report shall include analysis and forecasts of the
following matters related to military cooperation between selling
states and the People’s Republic of China:
‘‘(A) The extent in each selling state of government knowl-
edge, cooperation, or condoning of sales or transfers of military
hardware, expertise, or technology to the People’s Republic
of China.
‘‘(B) An itemization of significant sales and transfers of
military hardware, expertise, or technology from each selling
state to the People’s Republic of China that have taken place
since 1995, with a particular focus on command, control,
communications, and intelligence systems.
‘‘(C) Significant assistance by any selling state to key
research and development programs of China, including pro-
grams for development of weapons of mass destruction and
delivery vehicles for such weapons, programs for development
of advanced conventional weapons, and programs for develop-
ment of unconventional weapons.
‘‘(D) The extent to which arms sales by any selling state
to the People’s Republic of China are a source of funds for
military research and development or procurement programs
in the selling state.
‘‘(3) The report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect
to each area of analysis and forecasts specified in paragraph (2)—
‘‘(A) an assessment of the military effects of such sales
or transfers to entities in the People’s Republic of China;
‘‘(B) an assessment of the ability of the People’s Liberation
Army to assimilate such sales or transfers, mass produce new
equipment, or develop doctrine for use; and
‘‘(C) the potential threat of developments related to such
effects on the security interests of the United States and its
friends and allies in Asia.’’.
SEC. 1222. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR REPORTING TO CONGRESS
ON MILITARY DEPLOYMENTS TO HAITI.
Section 1232(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 788; 50 U.S.C.
1541 note) is repealed.
H. Con. Res. 288—6
SEC. 1223. REPORT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL ON PROVISION OF
DEFENSE ARTICLES, SERVICES, AND MILITARY EDU-
CATION AND TRAINING TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.
(a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General shall conduct a study
of the following:
(1) The benefits derived by each foreign country or inter-
national organization from the receipt of defense articles,
defense services, or military education and training provided
after December 31, 1989, pursuant to the drawdown of such
articles, services, or education and training from the stocks
of the Department of Defense under section 506, 516, or 552
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2318, 2321j,
or 2348a) or any other provision of law.
(2) Any benefits derived by the United States from the
provision of defense articles, defense services, and military
education and training described in paragraph (1).
(3) The effect on the readiness of the Armed Forces as
a result of the provision by the United States of defense articles,
defense services, and military education and training described
in paragraph (1).
(4) The cost to the Department of Defense with respect
to the provision of defense articles, defense services, and mili-
tary education and training described in paragraph (1).
(b) REPORTS.—(1) Not later than April 15, 2002, the Comptroller
General shall submit to Congress an interim report containing
the results to that date of the study conducted under subsection
(a).
(2) Not later than August 1, 2002, the Comptroller General
shall submit to Congress a final report containing the results of
the study conducted under subsection (a).
Attest:
Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Attest:
Secretary of the Senate.