datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(i) FORM.—The non-Federal share 
under subparagraph (A)(i) may be pro-
vided in cash or in-kind. 
(ii) CREDITS.— 
(I) IN GENERAL.—In calculating 
the non-Federal share under clause 
(i), the Secretary shall provide to the 
City and any other non-Federal spon-
sor a credit (including an in-kind 
credit) in an amount that reflects— 
(aa) the value of any land, 
easement, right-of-way, reloca-
tion, or dredged material disposal 
area provided by the City and 
any other non-Federal sponsor in 
carrying out the applicable pilot 
project; and 
(bb) the reasonable cost of 
any work performed in connec-
tion 
with 
a 
study, 
preconstruction engineering and 
design project, or construction 
project required to carry out the 
revitalization plan under sub-
section (b)(1). 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:19 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5244.IH
H5244
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5312 
To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to revise and extend 
that Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 9, 2006 
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. RENZI, Mr. COLE 
of Oklahoma, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. BACA, 
Mr. CASE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. 
KILDEE, and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following bill; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committees 
on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means, for a period to be subse-
quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to revise 
and extend that Act. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Health Care 
Improvement Act Amendments of 2006’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:45 May 16, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5312.IH
H5312
CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
(II) USE.—A credit provided 
under this clause may be used for any 
pilot project under this subsection. 
(4) PRIORITY.—The Secretary, in consultation 
with the City, shall assign a priority to each pilot 
project under this subsection. 
(5) FEDERAL
SHARE.—Subject to subsection 
(e), the Federal share of a pilot project under this 
subsection shall not exceed $5,000,000. 
(6) REPORT
TO
CONGRESS.—The Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report describing each 
pilot project carried out under this subsection as 
soon as practicable after the date on which the pilot 
project is completed. 
(7) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this subsection $35,000,000. 
(d) WATER REUSE PROJECT.—Section 219(f) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 117 Stat. 1836, 1838, 1841, 1844; 119 Stat. 2255) 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘CHARLESTON, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.—$5,000,000’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(72) 
CHARLESTON, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.— 
$5,000,000’’; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:19 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5244.IH
H5244
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
(2) by redesignating the second paragraph (71) 
and each subsequent paragraph as paragraphs (73) 
through (77), respectively; 
(3) in paragraph (75) (as redesignated by para-
graph (2))— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(75) $6,430,000’’ and in-
serting the following: 
‘‘(75) INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.—$6,430,000’’; 
and 
(B) by striking the semicolon at the end 
and inserting a period; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(78) LOS
ANGELES
RIVER, LOS
ANGELES, 
CALIFORNIA.—$40,000,000 
for 
a 
water 
reuse 
project, including measures for environmental res-
toration and revitalization of the Los Angeles River 
within the City of Los Angeles, California.’’. 
(e) MAXIMUM COST OF PROJECTS.—Each project 
carried out under the revitalization plan under subsection 
(b), and each pilot project carried out under subsection 
(c), shall be subject to section 902 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4183). 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:19 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5244.IH
H5244
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
ther recourse, directly or indirectly, upon a 
workers’ compensation claimant or work-
ers’ compensation payer to the agreement. 
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENT FOR TIMELY NOTICE 
OF MEDICARE REPAYMENTS OWED BY WORK-
ERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMANT OR PAYER TO 
SECRETARY.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 
days after the date on which the Secretary 
receives a request from a workers’ com-
pensation claimant or workers’ compensa-
tion payer for documentation of any condi-
tional payment made under subsection 
(b)(2)(B)(i) on behalf of the claimant, the 
Secretary shall provide to the claimant or 
payer such documentation. Such docu-
mentation shall be sufficient for the claim-
ant or payer to make a reasonable deter-
mination whether such a payment was for 
an item or service furnished in connection 
with the claimant’s work related injury or 
illness involved. The claimant or payer may 
rely on the documentation provided under 
this clause in making such determination. 
Payment of the amount of the conditional 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
payment, 
after 
deducting 
from 
such 
amount any procurement costs involved 
and any costs for unrelated and inappro-
priate items or services, shall discharge 
further liability with respect to the condi-
tional payment. 
‘‘(ii) 
LIABILITY
FOR
REIMBURSE-
MENTS RELATED TO REQUESTED INFOR-
MATION.—If the Secretary fails to provide 
information in accordance with clause (i), 
then neither the claimant or the payer de-
scribed in such clause shall be liable for 
any 
reimbursement 
under 
subsection 
(b)(2)(B) with respect to the conditional 
payment for which information was re-
quested under such clause. 
‘‘(C) PROTECTION FROM CERTAIN LIABIL-
ITY.— 
‘‘(i) LIABILITY FOR MEDICARE SET- 
ASIDE PAYMENT GREATER THAN PAYMENT 
UNDER WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAW.— 
No workers’ compensation claimant, work-
ers’ compensation payer, employer, admin-
istrator of the Medicare set-aside, legal 
representative of the claimant, payer, em-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, 
as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, 
Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 
Office Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2006. 
Attest:
Clerk.
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair 
Haven, Vermont, as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Of-
fice Building’’.
H. R. 5245
One Hundred Ninth Congress
of the
United States of America 
AT THE SECOND SESSION 
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 
the third day of January, two thousand and six 
An Act 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1 Marble 
Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, shall 
be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office 
Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
ployer, or administrator, or any other 
party related to the claimant, payer, em-
ployer, or administrator shall be liable for 
any payment amount established under a 
Medicare set-aside for an item or service 
provided to the claimant that is greater 
than the payment amount for the item or 
service established under the workers’ com-
pensation fee schedule (or in the absence 
of such schedule, the medical reimburse-
ment rate) under the compensation law or 
plan of the jurisdiction where the agree-
ment will be effective. 
‘‘(ii) 
LIABILITY
FOR
PROVIDER 
CHARGES
GREATER
THAN
PAYMENT 
UNDER WORKERS’ COMPENSATION AGREE-
MENT.—With respect to a workers’ com-
pensation settlement agreement, a provider 
may not bill (or collect any amount from) 
the workers’ compensation claimant, work-
ers’ compensation payer, employer, admin-
istrator of the Medicare set-aside, legal 
representative of the claimant, payer, em-
ployer, or administrator, or any other 
party related to the claimant, payer, em-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 
Office Building’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 27, 2006 
Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. GRIJALVA, 
Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 
A BILL 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, 
as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, 
Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
20:13 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5245.IH
H5245
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 
Office Building’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
20:13 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5245.IH
H5245
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4870 
To establish certain rules for Surface Transportation Board approval of 
waste management company applications to become rail carriers. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 2, 2006 
Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To establish certain rules for Surface Transportation Board 
approval of waste management company applications to 
become rail carriers. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINAL DECISION. 
The decision of the Surface Transportation Board in 
its Docket Number 34734 shall be the final decision re-
garding the application of Northeast Interchange Railway 
with respect to the rail line in Croton-on-Hudson, New 
York. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:04 Mar 04, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4870.IH
H4870
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN WASTE TRANSPORTATION 
APPLICATIONS. 
The Surface Transportation Board shall not approve 
a lease and operation exemption application, by a company 
operating less than 1,700 feet of track, for the purpose 
of hauling waste unless the Surface Transportation Board 
has conducted a public hearing in the jurisdiction normally 
exercising regulatory control over the transportation of 
waste. 
SEC. 3. MAJORITY VOTE. 
The Surface Transportation Board shall not approve 
a lease and operation exemption application by a company 
for the purpose of hauling waste without a majority vote 
of the full Surface Transportation Board. 
SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL LAW. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—The Surface Transportation 
Board shall require a company that becomes a rail carrier 
(within the meaning of section 10102(5) of title 49, 
United States Code) for the purpose of hauling waste to 
comply with all applicable State and local zoning laws. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef-
fect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:04 Mar 04, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4870.IH
H4870
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
IIB 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 7, 2006 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, 
as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:27 Jun 08, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5245.RFS
H5245
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
HR 5245 RFS 
SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, 
Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 
Office Building’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2006. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:27 Jun 08, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5245.RFS
H5245
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
apply to requests submitted to the Sec-
retary under clause (ii) to modify or termi-
nate a Medicare set-aside in the same 
manner as such subparagraphs apply to 
Medicare set-aside agreements submitted 
to the Secretary under subparagraph (A) 
of such paragraph to be deemed qualified 
Medicare set-asides. In applying such sub-
paragraphs (B) and (C), any reference to 
such subparagraph (A) shall be deemed a 
reference to clause (ii), and any reference 
in such subparagraph (B) to ‘the require-
ments of paragraph (2)(A)’ shall be 
deemed to include a reference to the show-
ing required under clause (ii). 
‘‘(v) EFFECTIVE
DATES
FOR
MODI-
FICATIONS AND TERMINATIONS.— 
‘‘(I) FOR
DEATH
OF
CLAIM-
ANT.—In the case of a termination re-
quest under clause (i) that is ap-
proved, the termination shall take ef-
fect on the latter of the date on which 
the showing described in such clause 
has been provided to the Secretary, or 
the date that is 60 days after the date 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
on which the individual entitled to dis-
bursement of the funds remaining in 
the Medicare set-aside involved sends 
the notice under clause (iii) to the 
party designated for receipt of such 
notice. 
‘‘(II) FOR
MEDICAL
IMPROVE-
MENT
OR
CHANGE
OF
CIR-
CUMSTANCES.—In the case of a modi-
fication request or termination request 
under clause (ii) that is approved ac-
cording to clause (iv), the modification 
or termination, respectively, shall take 
effect on the latter of the date of the 
approval or the date that is 60 days 
after the date on which the workers’ 
compensation claimant involved sends 
the notice under clause (iii) to the 
party designated for receipt of such 
notice. 
‘‘(vi) TREATMENT
OF
REMAINING 
MEDICARE SET-ASIDE FUNDS.—Upon ter-
mination or modification under this para-
graph, any funds released from the set- 
aside shall revert pursuant to the terms of 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4387
AN ACT
To provide that the School Governance Charter Amendment
Act of 2000 shall take effect upon the date such Act
is ratified by the voters of the District of Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
the settlement agreement, or if there is no 
reversionary clause, then such remaining 
funds shall be disbursed pursuant to the 
applicable State law. 
‘‘(7) TREATMENT OF STATE WORKERS’ COM-
PENSATION LAW.—For purposes of this subsection 
and subsection (l), if a workers’ compensation settle-
ment agreement is accepted, reviewed, approved, or 
otherwise finalized in accordance with the workers’ 
compensation law of the jurisdiction in which such 
agreement will be effective, such acceptance, review, 
approval, or other finalization shall be deemed con-
clusive as to any and all matters within the jurisdic-
tion of the workers’ compensation law, including the 
determination of the total amount that could have 
been payable for a claim which is the subject of a 
compromise agreement in accordance with para-
graph (2)(C)(iii). A determination made by applica-
ble authority for a jurisdiction that a workers’ com-
pensation settlement agreement is in accordance 
with the workers’ compensation law of the jurisdic-
tion shall not be subject to review by the Sec-
retary.’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1862(b) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)), as 
amended by subsection (a), is further amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘A pri-
mary plan’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsections (l) 
and (m), a primary plan’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii)— 
(A) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘In 
order to recover payment’’ and inserting ‘‘Sub-
ject to subsection (m), in order to recover pay-
ment’’; and 
(B) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘In 
addition’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection 
(m), in addition’’; and 
(3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘There is 
established a private cause of action’’ and inserting 
‘‘Subject to subsection (m), there is established a 
private cause of action’’. 
(d) MODERNIZING TERMINOLOGY FOR PURPOSES OF 
MEDICARE SECONDARY PAYER PROVISIONS.—Paragraph 
(2)(A) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘workmen’s 
compensation law or plan’’ and inserting ‘‘workers’ com-
pensation law or plan’’ each place it appears. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4389
AN ACT
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey
certain water distribution facilities to the North-
ern Colorado Water Conservancy District.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ADDITIONAL LIABILITY; SEVER-
ABILITY. 
(a) LIMITATION ON ADDITIONAL LIABILITY UNDER 
CURRENT AGREEMENTS EXCEPT FOR FRAUD.—Nothing 
in the Medicare secondary payer provisions in section 
1862(b) of the Social Security Act shall authorize the Sec-
retary of Health and Human Services to impose liability 
that is additional to the liability in effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act on the parties to a workers’ com-
pensation agreement the effective date of which is before 
such date of enactment, except in the case of fraud. 
(b) SEVERABILITY.—If any provision of this Act or 
the amendments made by this Act or the application there-
of to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the re-
mainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, 
or the application thereof to other persons not similarly 
situated or to other circumstances shall not be affected 
by such invalidation. 
SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to 
a workers’ compensation settlement agreement with an ef-
fective date on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
H. Res. 579 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
July 30, 2007. 
Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 
shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 
2831) to amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the 
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Ameri-
cans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation 
Act of 1973 to clarify that a discriminatory compensation de-
cision or other practice that is unlawful under such Acts oc-
curs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the discrimi-
natory compensation decision or other practice, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute rec-
ommended by the Committee on Education and Labor now 
printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, 
as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 
as amended, to final passage without intervening motion ex-
IIB 
Calendar No. 494 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 7, 2006 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs 
JUNE 22, 2006 
Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, 
as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, 
Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building’’.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 
Office Building’’.
Calendar No. 494 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5245 
AN ACT 
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair 
Haven, Vermont, as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Of-
fice Building’’. 
JUNE 22, 2006 
Reported without amendment