I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4385
To amend title 23, United States Code, to designate the National Highway
System, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 11, 1994
Mr. RAHALL (for himself, Mr. MINETA, Mr. SHUSTER, and Mr. PETRI) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public
Works and Transportation
A BILL
To amend title 23, United States Code, to designate the
National Highway System, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘National Highway System Designation Act of 1994’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
TITLE I—NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION AND
OTHER PROVISIONS
Sec. 101. National Highway System designation.
Sec. 102. Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program.
Sec. 103. Quality improvement.
Sec. 104. Contracting for engineering and design services.
Sec. 105. Highway safety promotion program.
Sec. 106. Project eligibility.
Sec. 107. Wisconsin substitute project.
Sec. 108. Use of recycled paving material.
Sec. 109. Work zone safety.
Sec. 110. Corrected projects.
Sec. 111. Rescissions.
Sec. 112. Additional projects.
Sec. 113. Study of radio and microwave technology for commercial and other
motor vehicles.
Sec. 114. Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency.
Sec. 115. Railway-highway crossings project.
Sec. 116. New River Parkway, West Virginia.
Sec. 117. National recreational trails.
Sec. 118. Designation of Coal Heritage Trail.
Sec. 119. Limitations on funding of operating assistance.
Sec. 120. Intercity bus transportation.
Sec. 121. Repeals of existing projects.
Sec. 122. Miscellaneous transit projects.
Sec. 123. Multiyear contract for metro rail project.
TITLE II—TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO ISTEA AND RELATED
LAWS
Sec. 201. Definitions.
Sec. 202. References to Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and De-
fense Highways.
Sec. 203. Federal-Aid Systems.
Sec. 204. Apportionment.
Sec. 205. Programs of projects.
Sec. 206. Advance acquisition of rights-of-way.
Sec. 207. Standards.
Sec. 208. Letting of contracts.
Sec. 209. Prevailing rate of wage.
Sec. 210. Construction.
Sec. 211. Advance construction.
Sec. 212. Maintenance.
Sec. 213. Certification acceptance.
Sec. 214. Availability of funds.
Sec. 215. Federal share.
Sec. 216. Payment to States for construction.
Sec. 217. Relocation of utility facilities.
Sec. 218. Advances to States.
Sec. 219. Emergency relief.
Sec. 220. Applicability of axle weight limitations.
Sec. 221. Toll roads.
Sec. 222. Rail-highway crossings.
Sec. 223. Surface transportation program.
Sec. 224. Metropolitan planning.
Sec. 225. Statewide planning.
Sec. 226. Control of junkyards.
Sec. 227. Nondiscrimination.
Sec. 228. Enforcement of requirements.
Sec. 229. Availability of rights-of-way.
Sec. 230. Highway bridge program.
Sec. 231. Great River Road.
Sec. 232. Hazard elimination program.
Sec. 233. Use of safety belts and motorcycle helmets.
Sec. 234. National maximum speed limit.
Sec. 235. Minimum allocation.
Sec. 236. National minimum drinking age.
Sec. 237. Revocation of drivers’ licenses of individuals convicted of drug of-
fenses.
Sec. 238. Reimbursement for segments of Interstate System constructed with-
out Federal assistance.
Sec. 239. Federal lands highway program.
Sec. 240. Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkway.
Sec. 241. State Highway Department.
Sec. 242. Management systems.
Sec. 243. State planning and research.
Sec. 244. Appropriation for highway purposes of Federal lands.
Sec. 245. International highway transportation outreach program.
Sec. 246. Highway safety programs.
Sec. 247. National Highway Safety Advisory Committee.
Sec. 248. Alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures.
Sec. 249. Public transit facilities.
Sec. 250. High cost bridge project.
Sec. 251. Congestion relief project.
Sec. 252. High priority corridors on National Highway System.
Sec. 253. High priority corridor project.
Sec. 254. Rural access projects.
Sec. 255. Urban access and mobility projects.
Sec. 256. Innovative projects.
Sec. 257. Intermodal projects.
Sec. 258. Miscellaneous Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
amendments.
Sec. 259. Disadvantaged business enterprise program.
Sec. 260. Amendments to Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation As-
sistance Act of 1987.
Sec. 261. Freeway service patrols.
Sec. 262. Pan American Highway.
Sec. 263. Section 3 program amendments.
Sec. 264. Metropolitan planning.
Sec. 265. Formula grant program.
Sec. 266. Mass transit account block grants.
Sec. 267. Grants for research and training.
Sec. 268. General provisions.
Sec. 269. Period of availability and reapportionment of section 16 funds.
Sec. 270. Rural transit program.
Sec. 271. Nondiscrimination.
Sec. 272. Authorizations.
Sec. 273. Project management oversight.
Sec. 274. Planning and research program.
Sec. 275. Needs survey and transferability study.
Sec. 276. State responsibility for rail fixed guideway system.
Sec. 277. National Transit Institute.
Sec. 278. Increased Federal share.
Sec. 279. Performance reports on mass transit systems.
Sec. 280. Cross reference to Federal Transit Act.
minals, rail and other intermodal transportation
facilities; and
‘‘(B) any Congressional High Priority Cor-
ridor established by section 1105 of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 (105 Stat. 2031) which was not identified
on the National Highway System designated by
subsection (c), subject to the completion of fea-
sibility studies.’’.
(b) PROPOSED NTS.—Not later than 2 years after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to Congress a proposal for a comprehensive Na-
tional Transportation System using the National Highway
System as the backbone for establishing the National
Transportation System.
SEC. 102. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IM-
PROVEMENT PROGRAM.
(a) APPORTIONMENT FORMULA.—Section 104(b)(2)
of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘State’’ each place it appears;
(2) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘States’’ the first place it appears;
(3) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘Act’’;
(4) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(5) in subparagraph (C) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(6) in subparagraph (D) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(7) in subparagraph (E) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(8) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘carbon monoxide’’; and
(9) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘relative populations’’.
(b) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—Section 149(b) of such
title is amended by inserting before ‘‘of a national ambi-
ent’’ each place it appears ‘‘or maintenance’’.
(c) STATES WITHOUT A NONATTAINMENT AREA.—
Section 149(c) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘in
fiscal year 1994’’ after ‘‘Act’’.
SEC. 103. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
(a) LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.—Section 106 of
title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following:
‘‘(e) LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.—
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish a program to require States to conduct an
analysis of the life-cycle costs of all projects on the
National Highway System.
‘‘(2) ANALYSIS
OF
LIFE-CYCLE
COSTS
DE-
FINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘analysis of
life-cycle costs’ means a process for evaluating the
total economic worth of one or more projects by ana-
lyzing both initial costs as well as discounted future
costs, such as maintenance, reconstruction, rehabili-
tation, restoring, and resurfacing costs, over the life
of the project or projects.’’.
(b) VALUE ENGINEERING.—Section 106 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) VALUE ENGINEERING FOR NHS.—
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish a program to require States to carry out a
value engineering analysis for all projects on the Na-
tional Highway System.
‘‘(2) VALUE ENGINEERING DEFINED.—For pur-
poses of this subsection, the term ‘value engineering
analysis’ means a systematic process of review and
analysis of a project or activity during its design
phase by a multidisciplined team of persons not
originally involved in the project or activity in order
to provide suggestions for reducing the total cost of
the project or activity and providing a project or ac-
tivity of equal or better quality. Such suggestions
may include a combination or elimination of ineffi-
cient or expensive parts of the original proposed de-
sign for the project or activity and total redesign of
the proposed project or activity using different tech-
nologies, materials, or methods so as to accomplish
the original purpose of the project or activity.’’.
(c) WARRANTIES.—Section 112 of such title is
amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub-
section (g); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the follow-
ing:
‘‘(f) WARRANTIES.—Each contract relating to con-
struction of a Federal-aid highway entered into after the
date of the enactment of this subsection shall contain a
provision that requires the contractor to guarantee and
warrant that the contractor will perform the contractor’s
obligations under the contract in accordance with require-
ments for Federal-aid highway projects under applicable
contract law.’’.
SEC. 104. CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES.
(a) PERMANENT PROGRAM.—Section 112(b)(2) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new subparagraphs:
‘‘(C) PERFORMANCE
AND
AUDITS.—Any
contract or subcontract awarded in accordance
with subparagraph (A), whether funded in
whole or in part with Federal-aid highway
funds, shall be performed and audited in com-
pliance with cost principles contained in the
Federal acquisition regulations of part 31 of
title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
‘‘(D) INDIRECT COST RATES.—Instead of
performing its own audits, a recipient of funds
under a contract or subcontract awarded in ac-
cordance with subparagraph (A) shall accept in-
direct cost rates established in accordance with
the Federal acquisition regulations for 1-year
applicable accounting periods by a cognizant
government agency or independent certified
public accountant if such rates are not cur-
rently under dispute. Once a firm’s indirect cost
rates are accepted, the recipient of such funds
shall apply such rates for the purposes of con-
tract estimation, negotiation, administration,
reporting, and contract payment and shall not
be limited by administrative or de facto ceilings
in accordance with section 15.901(c) of such
title 48. A recipient of such funds requesting or
using the cost and rate data described in this
subparagraph shall notify any affected firm be-
fore such request or use. Such data shall be
confidential and shall not be accessible or pro-
vided, in whole or in part, to any other firm or
to any government agency which is not part of
the group of agencies sharing cost data under
this subparagraph, except by written permission
of the audited firm. If prohibited by law, such
cost and rate data shall not be disclosed under
any circumstances.
‘‘(E) STATE OPTION.—Subparagraphs (C)
and (D) shall take effect 2 years after the date
of the enactment of this subparagraph with re-
spect to all States; except that if a State, dur-
ing such 2-year period, adopts by statute an al-
ternative process intended to promote engineer-
ing and design quality and ensure maximum
competition by professional companies of all
sizes providing engineering and design services,
such subparagraphs shall not apply with respect
to such State.’’.
(b) REPEAL OF PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 1092 of
the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 (23 U.S.C. 112 note; 105 Stat. 2024) is repealed.
SEC. 105. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROMOTION PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 23, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 312 the
following new section:
‘‘§ 313. Highway safety promotion program
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall carry
out education, research, development, and technology
transfer activities to promote the safe operation and main-
tenance of commercial motor vehicles in interstate com-
merce.
‘‘(b) GRANTS.—To carry out the purposes of this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall make grants to, and enter into
cooperative agreements with—
‘‘(1) a not-for-profit membership organization
that has been engaged exclusively in truck-related
research and education since 1985; and
‘‘(2) not-for-profit organizations engaged in
commercial motor vehicle safety research.
‘‘(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the
costs of activities carried out under this section shall be
100 percent.
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—Out of administrative funds de-
ducted under section 104(a) of this title for each of fiscal
years 1995 through 1997, the Secretary shall make avail-
able—
‘‘(1) for making grants and entering into coop-
erative 
agreements 
under 
subsection 
(b)(1)
$1,000,000; and
‘‘(2) for making grants and entering into coop-
erative 
agreements 
under 
subsection 
(b)(2)
$500,000.
Such funds shall remain available until expended.
‘‘(e) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, approval by the Secretary of a
grant under this section shall be deemed a contractual ob-
ligation of the United States for payment of the Federal
share of the grant.
‘‘(f) ANNUAL REPORT.—Annually, beginning on Jan-
uary 1, 1996, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress
a report which provides information on the progress and
activities of the programs conducted under this section.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for
chapter 3 of such title is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 312 the following:
‘‘313. Highway safety promotion program.’’.
SEC. 106. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY.
Section 108(b) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of
1956 (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘such cost may be
further’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘, and (2) the amount of such
costs shall not include the portion of the project be-
tween High Street and Causeway Street’’.
SEC. 107. WISCONSIN SUBSTITUTE PROJECT.
(a) FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.—Subsection (b) of sec-
tion 1045 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1994) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.—
‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—Upon approval of any
substitute project or projects under subsection (a)—
‘‘(A) the costs of construction of the eligi-
ble transitway project for which such project or
projects are substituted shall not be eligible for
funds authorized under section 108(b) of the
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956; and
‘‘(B) a sum equal to the amount that
would have been apportioned to the State of
Wisconsin on October 1, 1994, under section
104(b)(5)(A) of title 23, United States Code, if
the Secretary had not approved such project or
projects shall be available to the Secretary from
the Highway Trust Fund to incur obligations
for the Federal share of the costs of such sub-
stitute project or projects.
‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts made available
under paragraph (1)(B) shall be available for obliga-
tion on and after October 1, 1994. Amounts made
available under paragraph (1)(B) shall remain avail-
able until expended and shall be subject to any limi-
tation on obligations for Federal-aid highways estab-
lished by law.
‘‘(3) APPLICABILITY
OF
TITLE
U.S.C.—
Amounts made available under paragraph (1)(B)
shall be available for obligation in the same manner
as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1
of title 23, United States Code; except that the Fed-
eral share of the cost of any project carried out with
such funds shall be determined in accordance with
section 103(e)(4)(D) of such title.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) SUBSECTION (c).—The second sentence of
subsection (c) of section 1045 of such Act is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘the authority of section 103(e)(4) of
title 23, United States Code,’’ and inserting ‘‘section
21(a)(2) of the Federal Transit Act’’.
(2) SUBSECTION (d)(1).—Subsection (d)(1) of
section 1045 of such Act is amended by striking
‘‘project for’’ and all that follows through the period
at the end thereof and inserting ‘‘transit project.’’.
(3) SUBSECTION (d).—Subsection (d) of section
1045 of such Act is amended by striking paragraph
(3) and by redesignating paragraph (4) as para-
graph (3).
(c) REDUCTION OF INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION AU-
THORIZATION.—Section 108(b) of the Federal-Aid High-
way Act of 1956 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000,000
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$1,800,000,000, reduced by the amount made avail-
able under section 1045(b)(1)(B) of the Intermodal Sur-
face Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1996’’.
SEC. 108. USE OF RECYCLED PAVING MATERIAL.
(a) DOT GUIDANCE.—Section 1038(c)(1) of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(23 U.S.C. 109 note) is amended by striking ‘‘an interest
in the use of such asphalt’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘concern in fulfilling the minimum utilization require-
ments of subsection (d)(1). Such technology transfer ac-
tivities and training programs shall be initiated without
delay and shall include all eligible uses of recycled rubber,
alternative applications, and other materials and shall
focus on achieving the best performance results for all eli-
gible uses. Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this sentence, the Secretary shall transmit
to Congress a report detailing the plans to implement this
subsection.’’.
(b) STATE CERTIFICATION.—Section 1038(d)(1) of
such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘established by this section.’’
and inserting ‘‘, other materials, and alternative ap-
plications established by this section. Each State
shall also annually certify its progress in its waste
tire abatement program under paragraph (7).’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘1995’’ the first place it appears
and inserting ‘‘1996’’;
(3) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘1994’’
and inserting ‘‘1995’’;
(4) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘1995’’
and inserting ‘‘1996’’;
(5) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘and’’
after the semicolon at the end;
(6) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘1996;
and’’ and inserting ‘‘1997.’’; and
(7) by striking subparagraph (D).
(c) OTHER MATERIALS.—Section 1038(d)(2) of such
Act is amended by inserting before the period at the end
the following: ‘‘; except that, of that amount, no more than
1⁄2 may be met with the use of asphalt containing re-
claimed asphalt in fiscal years 1996 and 1997’’.
(d) PENALTY.—Section 1038(d)(4) of such Act is
amended—
(1) by inserting before ‘‘The’’ the following:
‘‘(A) WITHHOLDING.—’’;
(2) by indenting subparagraph (A), as des-
ignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, and
moving such paragraph 2 ems to the right;
(3) by inserting before ‘‘utilization require-
ment’’ the following: ‘‘by which such State does not
satisfy the’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) ESCROW ACCOUNT.—Apportionments
withheld from a State by the Secretary under
this subsection shall be placed in escrow for 2
years pending satisfaction of the minimum utili-
(f) ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION.—Section 1038(d) of
such Act is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(8) ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A State may for any
year meet up to 1⁄2 of the minimum utilization
requirement established by paragraph (1) (ex-
cluding any deduction a State may take pursu-
ant to subsection (c)) by using an equivalent
amount of recycled rubber for alternative appli-
cations, other than making asphalt pavement,
if—
‘‘(i) the State certifies that the alter-
native application does not present a
threat to safety, human health, or the envi-
ronment; and
‘‘(ii) it is demonstrated that such al-
ternative applications provide equal or en-
hanced engineering benefits.
‘‘(B) GUIDELINES.—The Secretary, in con-
sultation with the Administrator, shall issue
guidelines with respect to compliance with alter-
native applications under the conditions set
forth in clauses (i) and (ii).’’.
(g) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1038(e) of such Act is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(1);
(2) in paragraph (2) by inserting before
‘‘taken’’ the following: ‘‘(other than tire buffings de-
fined as a byproduct of the retreading industry) or
any products produced from the processing of whole
scrap tires or tire materials’’.
(3) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (2) and inserting a semicolon; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(3) the term ‘alternative applications’ means
uses of recycled rubber in such civil engineering ap-
plications such as noise and safety barriers, other
safety hardware, fences, soil retaining walls, slope
stabilization measures, subgrade insulation, and
lightweight fill, where the product or material con-
taining recycled rubber provides a benefit to the
highway construction and is left in place as a result
of the highway construction; such term does not
apply to products or materials such as traffic cones
or vehicles which are used only temporarily in con-
struction of the highway;
‘‘(4) the term ‘Administrator’ means the Ad-
ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;
and
‘‘(5) the term ‘State’ has the meaning such
term has under section 101 of title 23, United
States Code.’’.
SEC. 109. WORK ZONE SAFETY.
Section 1051 of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 401 note) is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘technologies and services,’’
after ‘‘appurtenances,’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘training,’’ after ‘‘traffic con-
trol plans,’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘The Secretary shall annually review, and
provide to State and local governments, information
and recommendations concerning safety practices
that can enhance safety at highway construction
sites, including information relating to new safety
technologies, services, traffic control plans, training,
and work zone-related bidding practices. The Sec-
retary is directed to develop within the program a
process for assuring that, for each project, there will
be a person trained and certified who will have the
responsibility and authority for assuring that the
provisions of the traffic control plan and other safety
aspects of the work zone are effectively adminis-
tered.’’.
SEC. 110. CORRECTED PROJECTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The purpose of this section is to
provide assistance for certain highway projects in order
to correct errors and omissions in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.—The Secretary
is authorized to carry out the projects described in this
subsection. There is authorized to be appropriated out of
the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit
Account) for fiscal year 1995 to carry out each such
project the amount listed for each such project:
City/State
Projects
Amount in
millions
1.
North Minnesota ..........
Construction and reconstruction of Forest
Highway 11 connecting Aurora-Hoyt
Lakes and Silver Bay, MN .......................
8.5
2.
Philadelphia, Penn-
sylvania .....................
Reconstruction of the Old Delaware Avenue
Service Road.
1.6
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable on
account of any project under this section shall be 80 per-
cent of the cost thereof.
(d) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provi-
sions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall
delegate responsibility for construction of a project or
projects under this section to the State in which such
project or projects are located upon request of such State.
(e) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which
has been delegated responsibility for construction of a
project under this section—
(1) has obligated all funds allocated under this
section for construction of such project; and
(2) proceeds to construct such project without
the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all pro-
cedures and all requirements applicable to such
project, except insofar as such procedures and re-
quirements limit the State to the construction of
projects with the aid of Federal funds previously al-
located to it;
the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a
State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost
of construction of the project when additional funds are
allocated for such project under this section.
(f) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized
by this section shall be available for obligation in the same
manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter
1 of title 23, United States Code, except that the Federal
share of the cost of any project under this section shall
be determined in accordance with this section and such
funds shall remain available until expended. Funds au-
thorized by this section shall not be subject to any obliga-
tion limitation.
SEC. 111. RESCISSIONS.
(a) RESCISSIONS.—The following unobligated bal-
ances on September 30, 1994, of funds made available for
the following provisions are hereby rescinded:
(1) $78,993.92 made available by section
131(c) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act
of 1982.
(2) $26,500,000 made available by section
404(a)(2) of the Surface Transportation Assistance
Act of 1982.
(3) $1,500,000 made available by section
106(a)(1) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(4) $942,249 made available for section
149(a)(66) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(5) $376,194.94 made available for section
149(a)(111)(C) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(6) $36,979.05 made available for section
149(a)(111)(J) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(7) $34,281.53 made available for section
149(a)(111)(K) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(8) $258,131.85 made available for section
149(a)(111)(L) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(9) $446,768 made available for section
149(a)(92) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(10) $2,058,323 made available for section
149(a)(94) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(11) $52,834 made available for section
149(a)(95) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(12) $427,340 made available for section
149(a)(99) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(13) $3,559,837 made available for section
149(a)(35) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(14) $797,800 made available for section
149(a)(100) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(15) $55.43 made available by section 149(c)(3)
of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Reloca-
tion Assistance Act of 1987.
(16) $49,700,000 made available by section
1012(b)(6) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(17) $29,300,000 made available by section
1003(a)(7) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(18) $150,000,000 made available by section
1036(d)(1)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(19) $1,500,000 made available by section
1036(d)(1)(B) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(20) $11,000,000 made available by section
21(a)(1) of the Federal Transit Act.
(b) REDUCTIONS IN AUTHORIZED AMOUNTS.—Sec-
tion 1036(d)(1)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1986) is amend-
ed—
(1) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ the second
place it appears and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘$125,000,000’’ each place it
appears and inserting ‘‘$62,500,000’’.
SEC. 112. ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.—The Secretary
is authorized to carry out the projects described in this
subsection. There is authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years 1995, 1996, and 1997 to carry out each such
project the amounts listed for each such project:
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
1. Alabama ....................
Birmingham Northern Beltline ...................................
2.900
2. Alabama ....................
Black Warrior River Bridge Study ..............................
0.100
3. Alabama ....................
I–759 Extension ..........................................................
20.000
4. Alabama ....................
AL182/I–10 Evacuation Connector Improvements .....
4.000
5. Alabama ....................
Patton Island Bridge Construction .............................
9.000
6. Alabama ....................
Montgomery Outer Loop Beltway ...............................
3.000
7. Arizona ......................
Gila River Crossing ......................................................
6.000
8. Arizona ......................
US93 Upgrade: Kingman to Lake Mead ....................
4.000
9. Arizona ......................
Veterans Memorial Overpass .......................................
5.000
10. Arkansas ...................
US71 Upgrade: Alma to Louisiana Border ................
3.000
11. Arkansas ...................
US71 Upgrade: I–40 to Fayetteville ...........................
3.500
2.000
12. Arkansas ...................
Lake Bull Shoals Bridge .............................................
0.400
13. Arkansas ...................
Van Buren Regional Intermodal Facility ....................
0.100
14. Arkansas ...................
US63 Bypass Upgrade, Jonesboro ..............................
5.000
15. Arkansas ...................
Conway Bypass Study and Design ..............................
3.000
16. California ..................
CA 84/I–580 Interchange Construction ......................
4.000
17. California ..................
CA4 Freeway Expansion, Pittsburg ............................
2.000
18. California ..................
Galena St. Improvements/I–15 Interchange Construc-
tion.
3.000
19. California ..................
CA56 Extension: I–5 to I–15 ......................................
3.000
20. California ..................
Stocker Street/La Cienega Interchange ......................
7.100
21. California ..................
South Lake Tahoe Loop Road Reconfiguration ..........
2.000
22. California ..................
Bristol Street Improvement Project ............................
3.000
23. California ..................
CA30 Extension/Gap Closure ......................................
2.000
5.000
24. California ..................
CA87 Corridor Construction .......................................
7.000
25. California ..................
CA113 Railroad Grade Separation ..............................
5.240
26. California ..................
Third Feather River Bridge ........................................
2.000
27. California ..................
CA113A–5 Interchange and Improvements ................
0.500
28. California ..................
CA905 Congestion Mitigation .....................................
4.000
5.000
29. California ..................
Humboldt Bay Port Access Enhancement ..................
10.000
30. California ..................
CA7 Improvements: CA98 to I–8 ................................
2.000
31. California ..................
Ontario Airport Ground Access ...................................
4.000
32. California ..................
CA71 Planning and Design, Riverside County ...........
2.000
33. California ..................
Highway Interchange, Brea .........................................
0.950
34. California ..................
CA41 Expansion ..........................................................
3.000
35. California ..................
I–15 Widening: Victorville to Barstow ........................
2.000
14.000
36. California ..................
I–15 Access, George Air Force Base ...........................
1.000
37. California ..................
Arden—Garden Connector ..........................................
6.000
38. California ..................
CA126 Improvements: I–5 to McBean Parkway ........
4.000
39. California ..................
CA138–Ave. P–8 Improvements: CA14 to 50th St., E
2.000
40. California ..................
CA4 Upgrade ...............................................................
19.000
41. California ..................
Mare Island Access Study ...........................................
1.000
42. California ..................
CA237/I–880 Interchange ...........................................
13.500
43. California ..................
Eastern Transportation Corridor ................................
10.000
44. California ..................
I–205 Widening: I–580 to I–5 ....................................
3.000
45. California ..................
I–710/Firestone Boulevard Interchange ......................
5.800
46. California ..................
CA58 Upgrade, Bakersfield .........................................
2.000
2.500
47. California ..................
CA178 Crosstown Corridor: CA178 to CA99 .............
2.000
2.500
48. California ..................
I–5 Capacity Enhancement .........................................
9.400
49. California ..................
Alameda Corridor ........................................................
4.000
5.000
50. California ..................
Arbor Vitae Street Expansion .....................................
4.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
51. California ..................
Pacific Coast Highway Palisades Bluff Stabilization ..
5.000
52. California ..................
US10—Sonoma County Congestion Relief .................
4.000
53. California ..................
US10—Marin County HOV Lanes .............................
1.000
54. Colorado ....................
Powers Boulevard Corridor .........................................
2.000
55. Colorado ....................
120th Avenue Improvements .......................................
5.500
56. Connecticut ...............
Regional Transportation Center Improvements, Nor-
wich.
6.000
57. Connecticut ...............
Hartford Riverfront Access .........................................
3.000
58. Connecticut ...............
Seaview Avenue Reconstruction ..................................
2.000
59. District of Columbia .
Constitution Avenue Rehabilitation .............................
3.000
60. District of Columbia .
Independence Avenue Rehabilitation ...........................
0.590
61. District of Columbia .
First Street Rehabilitation ..........................................
0.260
62. Florida ......................
Fuller-Warren Bridge ..................................................
2.000
19.000
63. Florida ......................
Jacksonville Airport Access Road ................................
2.000
64. Florida ......................
Midpoint Bridge and Corridor .....................................
2.000
5.000
65. Florida ......................
FL7/US441 Widening .................................................
5.000
66. Florida ......................
I–4/Greeneway Interchange .........................................
4.000
2.000
67. Florida ......................
US301/University Parkway Intersection Upgrade ......
2.000
68. Florida ......................
Palm Beach Port Road Relocations ............................
1.265
4.000
69. Florida ......................
Eller Drive/I–595 Improvements .................................
1.600
1.000
70. Florida ......................
NE Dade Bike Path ....................................................
1.135
71. Georgia ......................
GA61 Connector with I–20 .........................................
7.200
72. Georgia ......................
Appalachian Scenic Parkway .......................................
4.000
73. Georgia ......................
GA92 Corridor Upgrade, Cherokee County ................
1.700
20.000
74. Georgia ......................
GA9 Widening, Roswell ...............................................
8.300
75. Georgia ......................
Sidney-Lanier Bridge Reconstruction .........................
4.000
6.000
76. Georgia ......................
University Center Pedestrian Corridor, Atlanta .........
12.960
77. Illinois .......................
Sauget Road Extension ...............................................
3.100
78. Illinois .......................
West Boulevard Extension ..........................................
0.900
79. Illinois .......................
IL159 Relocation, Edwardsville ..................................
6.000
80. Illinois .......................
US67/IL267 Improvements .........................................
4.000
81. Illinois .......................
Business Loop 55 Widening: I–55 to Clearwater Ave
5.000
82. Illinois .......................
Central Avenue Bypass, Chicago .................................
15.000
83. Illinois .......................
US20 Improvements: East Dubuque to Galena ..........
2.000
84. Illinois .......................
Peoria-Chicago Highway .............................................
3.000
2.000
85. Illinois .......................
Springfield Veterans Parkway .....................................
2.000
2.000
86. Illinois .......................
Grand View Drive Improvements ................................
3.000
87. Illinois .......................
Heartland Riverfront Project ......................................
2.000
88. Illinois .......................
US67: Macomb to Jacksonville ...................................
1.000
89. Illinois .......................
Brush Creek Connector ...............................................
3.000
90. Illinois .......................
Richton Road Improvements, Crete, Illinois ...............
1.720
91. Illinois .......................
Steger Roadway Improvements, Steger, Illinois ..........
0.720
92. Illinois .......................
Polk Avenue Extension, Richton Park, Illinois ...........
0.336
93. Illinois .......................
Minooka Street Improvements, Minooka, Illinois ........
0.334
94. Illinois .......................
Rathje Road Improvements, Peotone, Illinois .............
0.320
95. Illinois .......................
Main Street Improvements, Ottawa, Illinois ...............
0.312
96. Illinois .......................
Otter Creek Road Improvements, Streator, Illinois ....
0.270
97. Indiana ......................
96th Street Upgrade ....................................................
2.000
5.000
98. Indiana ......................
Hoosier Heartland Corridor: Ft. Wayne to Lafayette
3.000
99. Indiana ......................
I–265 Extension ..........................................................
10.000
100. Indiana ......................
US231 Reconstruction .................................................
10.000
101. Indiana ......................
Evansville-Bloomington Corridor .................................
5.000
102. Indiana ......................
Lafayette Rail Relocation ............................................
5.000
20.000
103. Indiana ......................
City of Columbus ‘‘Front Door’’ .................................
9.000
104. Indiana ......................
East Chicago Marine Access Road ..............................
4.834
105. Indiana ......................
Lake Shore Drive Extension Study .............................
0.600
106. Iowa ...........................
I–29 Corridor Improvements, Sioux City ....................
3.000
107. Iowa ...........................
1A330: Marshalltown to Des Moines ..........................
6.000
108. Iowa ...........................
Burlington Iowa Southern Arterial Connector ............
0.880
109. Iowa ...........................
US 63: Bremer County to Minnesota Border .............
3.000
110. Iowa ...........................
1A5 Relocation ............................................................
10.000
111. Kentucky ...................
US231 Relocation ........................................................
5.000
112. Kentucky ...................
US27 Improvements ....................................................
1.000
3.000
113. Kentucky ...................
KY114 Widening: Sayleville to US23 .........................
1.000
5.000
114. Louisiana ..................
I–210/Nelson Access Road ..........................................
3.000
115. Louisiana ..................
17th Street Canal to Carrolton Overpass ....................
2.000
3.000
116. Maryland ...................
MD5/MD373 Interchange ...........................................
10.000
117. Maryland ...................
MD235 Improvements .................................................
5.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
118. Maryland ...................
MD237 Improvements .................................................
3.882
119. Maryland ...................
Beltway Advanced Traffic Monitoring ........................
3.000
120. Massachusetts ...........
Lincoln Square, Southbridge Street Gateways ............
2.400
121. Massachusetts ...........
I–90/MA146 Reconstruction .......................................
1.600
122. Massachusetts ...........
Franklin County Bikeway ...........................................
2.250
123. Michigan ....................
US23 Expansion ..........................................................
3.000
124. Michigan ....................
Bay City Road Interchange .........................................
3.000
125. Michigan ....................
M–59 Corridor .............................................................
20.000
126. Michigan ....................
Highway Safety Improvements ....................................
20.000
127. Michigan ....................
Ambassador Bridge Facilities ......................................
10.000
128. Michigan ....................
Monroe Rail Consolidation ..........................................
10.000
129. Michigan ....................
Detroit Airport Access Road .......................................
5.000
130. Michigan ....................
US31 Improvements: Holland to Grand Haven ..........
1.200
131. Michigan ....................
M–6: Grand Rapids South Beltline Construction .......
6.800
4.000
132. Michigan ....................
M–102/Grand River Interchange Redesign .................
4.000
133. Michigan ....................
McClellan Avenue ........................................................
2.300
134. Michigan ....................
US31 Upgrade, Berrien County ..................................
2.000
5.000
135. Minnesota ..................
TH610—Crosstown Expressway .................................
1.000
3.000
136. Minnesota ..................
Trunk Highway 33 Improvements ..............................
9.680
137. Minnesota ..................
34th Street Corridor ....................................................
2.000
138. Minnesota ..................
TH212 Construction ...................................................
3.000
139. Minnesota ..................
77th Street Improvements ...........................................
5.000
10.000
140. Minnesota ..................
Wabasha Street Bridge Replacement ..........................
9.000
11.000
141. Mississippi .................
Norrell Road Interchange ............................................
3.000
142. Missouri ....................
Lindbergh Boulevard Relocation .................................
5.000
143. Missouri ....................
St. Joseph Loop Expressway .......................................
8.300
144. Missouri ....................
Chouteau Bridge Replacement ....................................
10.000
145. Missouri ....................
Cape Girardeau Bridge Reconstruction .......................
5.000
5.000
146. Missouri ....................
MO21 Upgrade ............................................................
14.400
147. Missouri ....................
MO Highway M Relocation .........................................
4.000
148. Missouri ....................
I–255/MO231 Intersection ..........................................
1.600
149. Montana ....................
MT323 Upgrade ..........................................................
5.000
150. Montana ....................
Belgrade/I–90 Interchange ..........................................
2.110
151. Nebraska ...................
Niobrara, NE/Springfield, SD Bridge .........................
3.000
152. Nebraska ...................
27th Street and Highway 2 Pedestrain Bridge ...........
0.413
153. Nebraska ...................
South and East Beltway Study, Lincoln .....................
0.400
154. Nevada ......................
Spring Mountain I–15 Interchange .............................
5.000
155. Nevada ......................
I–80/Sparks Road Pyramid Interchange .....................
1.000
4.000
156. New Hampshire ........
Second Nashua River Crossing ...................................
3.000
157. New Hampshire ........
Manchester Airport Access Road Construction ...........
5.000
158. New Jersey ................
I–287 Improvements: I–78 to US22 ...........................
4.000
159. New Jersey ................
NJ21/McCarter Highway Improvements ....................
5.000
160. New Jersey ................
NJ17/NJ4 Interchange, Paramus ...............................
3.000
161. New Mexico ...............
Santa Fe Relief Route .................................................
5.000
162. New Mexico ...............
US70/Las Cruces Frontage Road System ..................
3.000
163. New York ..................
Utica-Rome Expressway ..............................................
5.000
5.000
164. New York ..................
NY60 Reconstruction, Ellicott ....................................
3.000
165. New York ..................
Quay Street Extension, Niagara Falls ........................
2.240
166. New York ..................
Delaware Street Reconstruction, Tonawanda .............
2.100
167. New York ..................
Williams Road Widening, Wheatfield ..........................
1.060
168. New York ..................
Lockport Expressway Study, Erie and Niagara Coun-
ties.
0.800
169. New York ..................
Rochester-Brockport Access Study ..............................
0.800
170. New York ..................
NY531 Extension Study: Ogden to Sweden ................
0.400
171. New York ..................
Jericho Turnpike Improvements: New York City to
Herricks Road.
4.000
2.000
172. New York ..................
New York State Thruway Upgrade .............................
5.000
173. New York ..................
New York Intermodal Facilities Study ........................
1.000
174. New York ..................
NY277 Reconstruction, Cheektowaga .........................
4.000
175. New York ..................
Main Street Bascule Bridge ........................................
2.000
176. New York ..................
Bronx/North Manhattan IVHS ...................................
6.480
177. New York ..................
Latta Road Improvements, Monroe County ................
6.000
178. New York ..................
Baldwinsville Bypass ...................................................
5.000
179. North Carolina ..........
US220 Construction ....................................................
3.000
180. North Carolina ..........
US17 Bridge Replacement ..........................................
5.000
181. North Carolina ..........
Charlotte Beltway East Segment ................................
2.000
182. North Carolina ..........
US64 Improvements ....................................................
10.000
183. North Carolina ..........
US74 Improvements ....................................................
10.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
184. North Carolina ..........
I–40: Asheville to I–81 ................................................
1.000
185. North Carolina ..........
Southern Charlotte Outer Loop ..................................
5.000
186. Ohio ...........................
Lorain Central Corridor ..............................................
5.000
187. Ohio ...........................
US23-Fostoria Bypass ................................................
3.000
188. Ohio ...........................
US22/US33—Lancaster Bypass .................................
1.000
5.800
189. Ohio ...........................
Boston Road Interchange ............................................
2.000
190. Ohio ...........................
Cleveland Gateway Project ..........................................
1.000
191. Ohio ...........................
New Intermodal Terminal, Fearing Boulevard ...........
5.000
192. Ohio ...........................
US30: OH235 to US68 ...............................................
4.000
193. Ohio ...........................
Alum Creek Drive Improvements ................................
2.000
4.000
194. Ohio ...........................
US30 Widening: Wooster to Riceland .........................
3.400
10.000
195. Ohio ...........................
Mt. Vernon to I–71 Connector Study .........................
1.600
196. Ohio ...........................
OH43 Improvements ...................................................
3.920
197. Ohio ...........................
Cuyahoga River Bridge, Cleveland ..............................
4.320
198. Ohio ...........................
Cleveland Pedestrian Walkway ....................................
1.440
199. Ohio ...........................
Pomeroy to Ravenswood Access Improvements ..........
8.900
200. Ohio ...........................
Youngstown-Hubbard Expressway ..............................
10.000
201. Oklahoma ..................
I–44 Widening: Arkansas Road to Yale Avenue .........
5.000
5.000
202. Oregon .......................
Jordan Cove Road Safety Improvements ....................
0.529
203. Oregon .......................
Salem Bypass Improvements .......................................
4.471
204. Oregon .......................
Columbia Slough Intermodal Projects .........................
5.000
205. Pennsylvania .............
Philadelphia Traffic Signal Controllers .......................
1.800
206. Pennsylvania .............
Philadelphia Bicycle Network ......................................
0.472
207. Pennsylvania .............
Tioga Marine Terminal ...............................................
8.000
208. Pennsylvania .............
US15 Upgrade—Tioga County ...................................
5.952
209. Pennsylvania .............
US 219 Truck Route—Osterhout Street ....................
2.880
210. Pennsylvania .............
PA948 Improvements, Forest County .........................
1.168
211. Pennsylvania .............
PA2001 Improvements, Pike County ..........................
4.800
0.300
212. Pennsylvania .............
PA14 Improvements, Bradford County .......................
4.800
213. Pennsylvania .............
PA3011 Improvements, Scranton ...............................
3.500
214. Pennsylvania .............
PA1069 Widening, Athens ..........................................
0.200
1.400
215. Pennsylvania .............
US219 Improvements, Cambria County .....................
10.000
216. Pennsylvania .............
US22—Section BO7 Reconstruction ..........................
8.000
217. Pennsylvania .............
PA56 Improvements: Johnstown to Cessna ................
8.000
218. Pennsylvania .............
US219 Improvements: Carroltown to I–80 .................
1.000
2.000
219. Rhode Island .............
Davisville Bridges ........................................................
5.000
220. South Carolina ..........
US17 Bridges ..............................................................
4.000
221. South Carolina ..........
US301 Improvements ..................................................
1.515
222. South Dakota ............
Vermillion Bridge ........................................................
4.600
223. Tennessee ..................
Harding Place Extension .............................................
5.000
224. Tennessee ..................
Gay Street Bridge Rehabilitation ................................
5.000
0.760
225. Tennessee ..................
Foothills Parkway—Missing Link ...............................
9.240
226. Tennessee ..................
Old Nashville Highway Bridge ....................................
4.000
227. Tennessee ..................
Murfreesboro Bicycle System ......................................
1.000
228. Tennessee ..................
I–81 Interchange Construction ...................................
1.200
229. Tennessee ..................
Memphis Outer Loop Beltway .....................................
3.000
230. Texas .........................
Border Highway Extension .........................................
10.000
231. Texas .........................
NASA Road 1 Upgrade ...............................................
4.500
15.000
232. Texas .........................
US59 Upgrade, Ft. Bend County ...............................
0.500
233. Texas .........................
US67 Widening ...........................................................
5.416
234. Texas .........................
Loop 12 Widening .......................................................
2.200
235. Texas .........................
TX36 Improvements ....................................................
5.000
236. Texas .........................
Brownsville Navigation District Access .......................
1.680
237. Texas .........................
Brownsville 6th & 7th Streets Improvements .............
1.600
238. Utah ..........................
US89 Upgrade .............................................................
4.000
239. Utah ..........................
I–15/University Avenue Interchange ...........................
3.000
240. Utah ..........................
I–15 Corridor Improvements, Salt Lake County ........
6.000
241. Utah ..........................
20th E. Highway Project ............................................
6.000
242. Virgin Islands ...........
Christiansted Bypass ...................................................
5.000
243. Virginia .....................
Coleman Bridge Expansion .........................................
2.000
244. Virginia .....................
Coalfields Expressway .................................................
5.000
245. Virginia .....................
VA123 Improvements, Northern Virginia ...................
10.000
246. Virginia .....................
Fairfax County Parkway/Franconia Parkway .............
5.000
247. Virginia .....................
I–81 to I–40, ‘‘I–83,’’ Connector ................................
5.000
248. Virginia .....................
Pinners Point Connector .............................................
4.400
249. Virginia .....................
S. Battlefield Boulevard/VA168 ..................................
5.000
250. Virginia .....................
14th Street Bridge Lane Addition ..............................
5.000
7.000
251. Washington ...............
I–5/196th Street Interchange ......................................
2.400
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
252. Washington ...............
WA305 Improvements .................................................
0.672
253. Washington ...............
Port Angeles Multi-Modal Center ................................
6.400
254. Washington ...............
WA18 Improvements: 312th Way to Maple Valley .....
4.000
1.000
255. Washington ...............
I–405/NE 8th Street Interchange ...............................
1.000
256. Washington ...............
US12 Improvements ....................................................
9.000
257. Washington ...............
US395 Improvements ..................................................
9.000
258. Washington ...............
Chelan/Douglas Transportation Center .......................
2.000
259. Washington ...............
Mill Plain Extension ....................................................
5.000
260. West Virginia ............
Fairmont Riverside Expressway ..................................
10.000
261. West Virginia ............
New River Parkway .....................................................
14.400
262. Wisconsin ..................
Janesville River Street Realignment ...........................
3.454
263. Wisconsin ..................
Main Street Bridge Replacement, Racine ...................
2.000
264. Wisconsin ..................
CTH P Improvements .................................................
0.480
265. Wisconsin ..................
WI29 Upgrade .............................................................
10.000
266. Wisconsin ..................
Oshkosh Rail Relocation ..............................................
6.000
267. Wisconsin ..................
US10 Upgrade: Anderson Road to CTH A ................
4.000
268. Wisconsin ..................
US41 Upgrade: Kaukauna to CTH F ........................
1.000
3.000
(b) ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES FOR HTF FUNDS.—
65.86 percent of the amount allocated by subsection (a)
from the Highway Trust Fund for each project authorized
by subsection (a) shall be available for obligation in fiscal
year 1995. 17.07 percent of such amount shall be available
for obligation in each of fiscal years 1996 and 1997.
(c) APPROPRIATIONS CAP.—Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated from the general fund of the
Treasury by subsection (a), not more than $300,000,000
may be appropriated in any single fiscal year.
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable on
account of any project under this section shall be 80 per-
cent of the cost thereof.
(e) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provi-
sions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall
delegate responsibility for construction of a project or
projects under this section to the State in which such
project or projects are located upon request of such State.
(f) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which
has been delegated responsibility for construction of a
project under this section—
(1) has obligated all funds allocated under this
section for construction of such project; and
(2) proceeds to construct such project without
the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all pro-
cedures and all requirements applicable to such
project, except insofar as such procedures and re-
quirements limit the State to the construction of
projects with the aid of Federal funds previously al-
located to it;
the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a
State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost
of construction of the project when additional funds are
allocated for such project under this section.
(g) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized
by this section from the Highway Trust Fund shall be
available for obligation in the same manner as if such
funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United
States Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of
any project under this section shall be determined in ac-
cordance with this section and such funds shall remain
available until expended. Funds authorized by this section
shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.
SEC. 113. STUDY OF RADIO AND MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY
FOR COMMERCIAL AND OTHER MOTOR VEHI-
CLES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6057 of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
2194) is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as sub-
section (c) and by inserting after subsection (a) the follow-
ing new subsection:
‘‘(b) STUDY
OF RADIO
AND MICROWAVE TECH-
NOLOGY FOR COMMERCIAL AND OTHER MOTOR VEHI-
CLES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall con-
duct a research study to develop and evaluate radio
and microwave technology for furtherance of safety
in commercial and other motor vehicles.
‘‘(2) EQUIPMENT.—Equipment developed under
the study to be conducted under paragraph (1) shall
be directed toward, but not limited to, warning driv-
ers of obstructions in a highway or limited visibility
conditions caused by snow, rain, fog, or dust.
‘‘(3) SAFETY
APPLICATIONS.—In conducting
the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall
determine whether the technology described in para-
graph (1) has other safety applications consistent
with the goals of this Act.’’.
(b) FUNDING.—Such section is further amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—Of the funds made available in fis-
cal year 1995 to carry out section 6058(b), $500,000 shall
be used to conduct the study under subsection (b).’’.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is
further amended—
(1) in the section heading by inserting ‘‘AND
OTHER’’ after ‘‘COMMERCIAL’’; and
(2) in the heading to subsection (a) by inserting
‘‘OF
SAFETY
TECHNOLOGY
FOR
COMMERCIAL
MOTOR VEHICLES’’ after ‘‘STUDY’’.
SEC. 
114. 
FOOTHILL/EASTERN 
TRANSPORTATION 
COR-
RIDOR AGENCY.
(a) FEDERAL LINE OF CREDIT.—For the purpose of
carrying out a demonstration of the construction of public
toll roads in Orange County, California, authorized by sec-
tion 129(d) of title 23, United States Code, there is au-
thorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for the Secretary
to enter into an agreement to make a line of credit avail-
able, with a principal amount not to exceed $120,000,000
to the public entity or entities with the statutory authority
to construct such facilities.
(b) EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—The line of credit under
this section shall be available for draws during the period
beginning on the date of completion of construction and
ending on the last day of the tenth calendar year following
the date construction of the facilities is completed.
(c) PURPOSES.—The line of credit under this section
shall be available to pay the costs of extraordinary repair
and replacement of the facilities, unexpected Federal or
State environmental restrictions, operation and mainte-
nance expenses of the facilities, and debt service on tax-
exempt or taxable obligations financing the facilities.
(d) LIMITATIONS.—
(1) CAPITAL EXPENDITURES.—With respect to
capital expenditures, draws on the line of credit
under this section shall only be made if and to the
extent proceeds from the sale of the obligations is-
sued by the public entity or entities which otherwise
would be available for such purposes are exhausted,
or are otherwise unavailable for the payment of such
capital expenditures.
(2) EXPENSES.—With respect to expenses, in-
cluding operation and maintenance expenses and
debt service, a draw on the line of credit under this
section shall only be made if revenues from toll oper-
ations and capitalized interest are insufficient (or
are otherwise unavailable) for such purposes.
(3) PER YEAR.—No more than 10 percent of
the total principal amount of the line of credit under
this section shall be available for draws in any one
year.
(4) THIRD PARTY CREDITOR RIGHTS.—No third
party creditor of the public entity or entities shall
have any right against the Federal Government with
respect to draws on the line of credit under this sec-
tion.
(5) AVAILABILITY FOR PARTICULAR COSTS.—
There is no guaranteed availability of proceeds of
the line of credit under this section for the payment
of any particular cost of the public entity or entities
which might be financed under this section.
(e) INTEREST RATE AND REPAYMENT PERIOD.—Any
draws (except for operation and maintenance expenses) on
the line of credit under this section shall accrue interest
at the 30-year United States Treasury bond rate begin-
ning on the date such draws are made and shall be repaid
in not more than 30 years; except that any draws under
the line of credit for operation and maintenance expenses
shall accrue interest at the 3-year United States Treasury
note rate beginning on the date such draws are made and
shall be repaid in not more than 3 years.
SEC. 115. RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS PROJECT.
Of the funds appropriated by Public Law 103–122
for railroad-highway crossings projects, $20,000,000 shall
be made available for costs, not to exceed 80 percent, of
a project to reduce rail-highway conflicts on M–59 near
Pontiac, Michigan, and a project on Bristol Road near
Flint, Michigan. From the $20,000,000 made available
under the preceding sentence, $500,000 shall be made
available to improve and upgrade Maple Road at Bishop
Airport, Michigan.
SEC. 116. NEW RIVER PARKWAY, WEST VIRGINIA.
(a) PRIORITY CONSIDERATION.—
(1) COMPLETION OF STUDIES.—The Secretary
shall require, as a matter of the highest priority, the
completion of all remaining studies associated with
the project authorized by section 149(a)(69) of the
Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation As-
sistance Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 191).
(2) SCHEDULE.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary is authorized and di-
rected to establish a schedule—
(A) for the completion by other Federal
agencies of any reviews required by law of such
studies; and
(B) by which the reconciliation of any dis-
crepancies among reviewing Federal agencies
must be met.
(3) DEADLINE.—The schedule referred to in
paragraph (2) shall provide for the project referred
to in paragraph (1) to proceed to construction before
December 31, 1995.
(b) VISITORS CENTER.—
(1) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make grants
to the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the
Director of the National Park Service, for the plan-
ning, design, and construction of a visitors center,
and such other related facilities as may be deter-
mined to be necessary, to facilitate visitor under-
standing and enjoyment of scenic, historic, cultural,
and recreational resources accessible by the New
River Parkway, West Virginia, and any related
buildings as may be determined to be necessary for
the administration of the parkway.
(2) SITE.—The visitors center, related facilities,
and buildings referred to in paragraph (1) shall be
located at a suitable location on a site for which title
is held by the United States in the vicinity of the
intersection of the New River Parkway and Inter-
state Route 64 or along the New River Parkway it-
self.
(3) CONSULTATION.—The Director of the Na-
tional Park Service shall consult with the New River
Parkway Authority and the State of West Virginia
in the planning, design, and construction of the visi-
tors center, related facilities, and buildings referred
to in paragraph (1).
(4) FUNDING.—Of the amounts made available
pursuant to section 1003(a)(6)(C) of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 1919) $1,300,000 for fiscal year 1995 and
$1,200,000 for fiscal year 1996 shall be made avail-
able for the purposes of carrying out this subsection.
Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 117. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL TRAILS.
(a) STATE ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1302(c) of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (33
U.S.C. 1261(c)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘Act’’ each place it appears and
inserting part;
(2) in paragraph (2) by striking subparagraph
(B) and redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D)
as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(3) SIXTH
YEAR
PROVISION.—On and after
the date that is 5 years after the date of the enact-
ment of this part, a State shall be eligible to receive
moneys under this part in a fiscal year only if the
State agrees to expend from non-Federal sources for
carrying out projects under this part an amount
equal to 20 percent of the amount received by the
State under this part in such fiscal year.’’.
(b) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—Section 1302(d)(1) of
such Act (33 U.S.C. 1261(d)(1)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (C) by striking ‘‘national
surveys’’ and inserting ‘‘a 1-time national survey’’;
(2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ‘‘and’’ at
the end;
(3) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub-
paragraph (E) and inserting after subparagraph (C)
the following:
‘‘(D) contracting for services with other
land management agencies; and’’; and
(4) by adding the end the following:
‘‘The 3 percent limitation in the preceding sentence
shall not apply to expenditures to pay the cost of
conducting the 1-time national survey described in
subparagraph (C).’’.
(c) ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1302(e) of such Act
(33 U.S.C. 1261(e)) is amended by redesignating
paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (6),
(7), (8), and (9), respectively, and by inserting after
paragraph (4) the following:
‘‘(5) ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION.—
‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT.—To the extent prac-
ticable and consistent with other requirements
of this section, in complying with paragraph
(4), a State shall give priority to project propos-
als which provide for the redesign, reconstruc-
tion, nonroutine maintenance, or relocation of
trails in order to mitigate and minimize the im-
pact to the natural environment.
‘‘(B) COMPLIANCE.—The State shall re-
ceive guidance for determining compliance with
subparagraph (A) from the recreational trail
advisory board satisfying the requirements of
subsection (c)(2)(A).’’.
(2) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
1302(e)(4) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1261(e)(4)) is
amended by striking ‘‘paragraphs (6) and (8)(B)’’
and inserting paragraphs ‘‘(7) and (9)(B)’’.
(d) EXCLUSIONS.—Section 1302(e)(7) of such Act,
as redesignated by subsection (c), is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(7) SMALL
STATE
EXCLU-
SION.—Any State’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘(7) EXCLUSIONS.—
‘‘(A) SMALL STATE.—Any State’’;
(2) by moving the text of subparagraph (A), as
so designated, 2 ems to the right; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) BEST INTEREST OF A STATE.—Any
State which determines based on trail needs
identified in its State Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan that it is in the best interest
of the State to be exempt from the require-
ments of paragraph (4) may apply to the Sec-
retary for such an exemption. Before approving
or disapproving an application for such an ex-
emption, the Secretary shall publish in the Fed-
eral Register notice of receipt of the application
and provide an opportunity for public comment
on the application.’’.
(e) RETURN OF MONEYS NOT EXPENDED.—Section
1302(e)(9) of such Act, as redesignated by subsection (c),
is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘the State’’ before ‘‘may be ex-
empted’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘and expended or committed’’
and all that follows before the period.
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section
1302 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1261) is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘(h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be
appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other
than the Mass Transit Account) to carry out this
section and section 1303 $6,000,000 for fiscal year
1995.
‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds au-
thorized by paragraph (1) shall be available for obli-
gation in the same manner as if the funds were ap-
portioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States
Code; except that the Federal share of the cost of
activities conducted with such funds shall be as pro-
vided in this section, such funds shall not be subject
to any obligation limitation other than subsection
(d)(3), and such funds shall remain available until
expended.
‘‘(3) TREATMENT.—Funds authorized by para-
graph (1) shall be treated as if such funds were part
of the National Recreational Trails Trust Fund for
purposes of making allocations to the States under
subsection (d).
(g) ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—Section 1303 of such
Act (16 U.S.C. 1262) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘11 members’’
and inserting ‘‘12 members’’;
(2) in subsection (b) by redesignating para-
graph (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and
(5), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph
(1) the following:
‘‘(2) 1 member appointed by the Secretary rep-
resenting individuals with disabilities;’’.
SEC. 118. DESIGNATION OF COAL HERITAGE TRAIL.
(a) DESIGNATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transpor-
tation, with the concurrence of the State of West
Virginia, shall designate by publication of a descrip-
tion thereof in the Federal Register, a vehicular tour
route along public roads linking sites and points of
interest associated with the coal mining heritage of
southern West Virginia.
(2) COAL
HERITAGE
TRAIL.—The route des-
ignated under paragraph (1) shall be known as the
‘‘Coal Heritage Trail’’ (hereinafter in this section re-
ferred to as the ‘‘trail’’), and shall be identified by
an appropriate marker to guide members of the vis-
iting public.
(3) SITES.—For the purposes of paragraph (1),
the sites and points of interest are those within the
11 counties which were the subject of the study enti-
tled ‘‘A Coal Mining Heritage Study: Southern West
Virginia’’ (1993, United States Department of the
Interior, National Park Service).
(b) IDENTIFICATION OF ROUTE.—
(1) HERITAGE TOUR ROUTES.—The trail as ini-
tially designated shall include—
(A) public roads identified as ‘‘Heritage
Tour Routes’’ and ‘‘Tour Route Connectors’’ on
the map entitled ‘‘Alternative Concept C’’ in the
study referred to in subsection (a)(3) and addi-
tional public roads which provide access to the
interpretive sites and areas identified on such
map; and
(B) public roads linking areas identified by
the map entitled ‘‘Figure 12’’ in the study enti-
tled ‘‘The Coal Road: A Survey of Southern
West Virginia Mining Tourism Potential’’
(March 1989, Marshall University Center for
Regional Progress for the United States De-
partment of Commerce, Economic Development
Administration).
(2) ADDITIONAL SEGMENTS.— The Secretary
of Transportation may, in the manner set forth in
subsection (a)(1), designate additional segments of
the trial from time to time, as the Secretary consid-
ers appropriate.
(d) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make grants to
the State of West Virginia for the purpose of erecting
signs or other informational devices along the trail display-
ing a Coal Heritage Trail marker. The marker shall be
devised by the West Virginia Division of Culture and His-
tory with the concurrence of the West Virginia Division
of Highways, and shall be subject to public comment.
(e) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—With respect to areas
linked by segments of the trial which are administered by
Federal, State, local, or nonprofit entities, the Secretary
may, pursuant to cooperative agreements with such enti-
ties, and in consultation with the State of West Virginia,
provide technical assistance in the development of inter-
pretive devices and information in order to contribute to
public appreciation of the historical, cultural, natural, sce-
nic, and recreational sites along the trial.
(f) FUNDING.—Of amounts made available pursuant
to section 1048(d) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1998), there shall
be available $1,000,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal
years 1995 and 1996 for the purposes of carrying out this
section. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 119. LIMITATIONS ON FUNDING OF OPERATING AS-
SISTANCE.
Section 9(k)(2) of the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C.
App. 1607a(k)(3)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and
(C) as subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; and
(2) in subparagraph (E), as redesignated by
paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘INCREASE.—’’ before
‘‘Beginning’’;
(3) in subparagraph (F), as redesignated by
paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘CONSUMER
PRICE
INDEX DEFINED.—’’;
(4) by moving subparagraphs (E) and (F), as
redesignated by paragraph (1), 4 ems to the right;
and
(5) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and subparagraph (A) and
inserting the following:
‘‘(2) LIMITATIONS ON FUNDING OF OPERATING
ASSISTANCE.—
‘‘(A) URBANIZED AREAS OF 1,000,000 OR
MORE.—The amount of funds apportioned
under this section which may be used for oper-
ating assistance shall not exceed 80 percent of
the amount of funds apportioned in fiscal year
1982 under paragraphs (1)(A), (2)(A), and
(3)(A) of section 5(a) of this Act to an urban-
ized area with a population of 1,000,000 or
more, 90 percent of funds so apportioned to an
urbanized area with a population of 200,000 or
more and less than 1,000,000 population; and
95 percent of funds so apportioned to an urban-
ized area of less than 200,000 population. Not-
withstanding the preceding sentence, an urban-
ized area that first became an urbanized area
under the 1980 census or thereafter may use
each fiscal year for operating assistance not to
exceed an amount equal to 2⁄3 of its apportion-
ment during the first full year it received funds
under this section.
‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN URBAN-
IZED AREAS WITH REDUCED POPULATIONS.—If
an urbanized area had a population under the
1980 decennial census of the United States of
more than 1,000,000 and has a population
under the 1990 decennial census of less than
1,000,000, the maximum percentage of funds
which may be used for operating assistance for
purposes of subparagraph (A) shall be 90 per-
cent of the amount of funds apportioned in fis-
cal year 1982 under such paragraphs (1)(A),
(2)(A), and (3)(A) to such area.
‘‘(C) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
URBANIZED
AREAS OF LESS THAN 200,000.—If an urbanized
area had a population under the 1990 decennial
census of the United States of less than
200,000, 100 percent of the funds apportioned
to such area under this section for each of fiscal
years 1995, 1996, and 1997 may be used for
operating assistance, notwithstanding any limi-
tation otherwise imposed on operating assist-
ance.
‘‘(D) OFFSET.—The amount of funds ap-
portioned under this section to each urbanized
area with a population of 200,000 or more in
each of fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997
which may be used for operating assistance but
for this subparagraph shall be reduced by the
amount determined by multiplying—
‘‘(i) the aggregate amount of in-
creases of operating assistance under sub-
paragraph (C) in such fiscal year; by
‘‘(ii) the quotient determined by divid-
ing—
‘‘(I) the amount of funds appor-
tioned under this section to such area
in such fiscal year which may be used
for operating assistance but for this
subparagraph; by
‘‘(II) the aggregate amount of
funds apportioned to all urbanized
areas with a population of 200,000 or
more under this section in such fiscal
year but for this subparagraph which
may be used for operating assist-
ance.’’.
SEC. 120. INTERCITY BUS TRANSPORTATION.
(a) BASIC PROGRAM.—Section 18(i)(1) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1614(i)(1)) is amend-
ed—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘15 percent’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘, and 7.5 percent of such
amounts in fiscal year 1995’’ after ‘‘1994’’; and
(3) by inserting after ‘‘demonstration projects,’’
the following: ‘‘the purchase of accessibility de-
vices,’’.
(b) DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM.—Section 3 of such
Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1602) is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
‘‘(o) INTERCITY BUS TRANSPORTATION.—Of the
amounts made available by subsection (k)(1)(C) in each
fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1994, the Sec-
retary shall make to operators of intercity bus transpor-
tation systems capital grants to support such systems, in-
cluding the purchase of accessibility devices, an amount
equal to 7.5 percent of the amounts made available under
section 18 in such fiscal year. The Federal grant for any
project under this subsection shall be 80 percent of the
net project cost; except that the Federal grant for the pur-
chase of accessibility devices under this subsection shall
be 90 percent of the net project cost.’’.
SEC. 121. REPEALS OF EXISTING PROJECTS.
(a) LONG
BEACH
METRO
LINK
FIXED
RAIL
PROJECT.—Section 3035(o) of the Federal Transit Act
(105 Stat. 2131) is repealed.
(b) HONOLULU RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT.—Section
3035(ww) of such Act (105 Stat. 2136) is repealed.
SEC. 122. MISCELLANEOUS TRANSIT PROJECTS.
(a) PORTLAND WESTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—
Section 3035(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2129) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—’’ after
‘‘WESTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—’’
(2) by striking the last sentence;
(3) by indenting paragraph (1) and moving it
2 ems to the right; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) AMENDMENT.—
‘‘(A) NEGOTIATION.—Within 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this paragraph,
the Secretary shall negotiate and sign an
amendment to the Westside Light Rail Project
multiyear grant agreement authorized under
paragraph (1) with the Tri-County Metropoli-
tan Transportation District of Oregon to carry
out the final design and construction of the lo-
cally preferred alternative for the Hillsboro ex-
tension, systems related costs as authorized in
Public Law 102–240, and acquisition of low
floor light rail vehicles, as set forth in Public
Law 102–388.
‘‘(B) ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION; CONTIN-
GENT
COMMITMENT.—The amendment nego-
tiated under this paragraph shall provide for
the use of advance construction authority under
section 3(l) of the Federal Transit Act and for
the use of contingent commitment authority
under section 3(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Transit
Act for the activities set forth in subparagraph
(A) for an amount equivalent to the Federal
share authorized under section 3 of the Federal
Transit Act for each specific activity; except
that the Federal share of the cost of the final
design and construction of the Hillsboro exten-
sion shall not exceed 1⁄3.
‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR ADVANCE CON-
STRUCTION.—In the event that the Tri-County
Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon
uses advance construction authority under this
paragraph, the Secretary shall convert that au-
thority into a grant and shall reimburse the
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation Dis-
trict of Oregon from funds made available
under section 3 of the Federal Transit Act in
fiscal years 1998 and 1999 for the Federal
share of the amounts expended (plus any eligi-
ble financing costs).
‘‘(D) INTEGRATED
PROJECT
FINANCING
PLAN.—The amendment negotiated under this
paragraph shall also include an integrated
project financing plan to permit the inter-
changeable use of Federal funds for activities
set forth in paragraph (1) and subparagraph
(A) to maintain the entire project construction
schedule.
‘‘(3) TREATMENT AS A SINGLE PROJECT.—The
Hillsboro extension to the Westside Light Rail
Project shall be considered by the Federal Transit
Administration as a single project extending from
downtown Portland, Oregon, to downtown Hillsboro,
Oregon, for the purposes of project review, evalua-
tion, and approval of construction under section 3(i)
of the Federal Transit Act and for the purpose of
preparing a report under section 3(j) of such Act.’’.
(b) NEW JERSEY URBAN CORE PROJECT.—Section
3031(d) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2122–2123) is amended—
(1) by inserting after ‘‘Hudson River Water-
front Transportation System’’ the following: ‘‘(in-
cluding corridor connections to and within the city
of Bayonne)’’; and
(2) by inserting after ‘‘Concourse,’’ the follow-
ing: ‘‘the West Shore Line,’’.
(c) NORTH BAY FERRY SERVICE.—Section 3035(c)
of such Act (105 Stat. 2129) is amended by striking
‘‘$8,000,000’’ and all that follows through ‘‘1993’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$17,000,000’’.
(d) STATEN ISLAND-MIDTOWN MANHATTAN FERRY
SERVICE.—Section 3035(d) of such Act is amended by
striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and all that follows through
‘‘1993’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’.
(e) CENTRAL AREA CIRCULATOR PROJECT.—Section
3035(e) of such Act is amended by striking the last sen-
tence.
(f) LOS ANGELES-SAN DIEGO RAIL CORRIDOR IM-
PROVEMENT PROJECT.—Section 3035(g) of such Act is
amended by striking ‘‘not less than’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.
(g) ADDITIONAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS AND RIGHT-OF-
WAY PURCHASE FOR GILROY SERVICE.—Section 3035(h)
of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 1994’’ and inserting
‘‘September 30, 1996’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘August 1, 1994,’’ and inserting
‘‘October 31, 1996,’’.
(h) DALLAS LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—
(1) MULTIYEAR GRANT AGREEMENT.—Section
3035(i) of such Act is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘6.4 miles’’ and inserting
‘‘9.6 miles’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘10 stations’’ and inserting
‘‘not to exceed 14 stations’’;
(C) by striking ‘‘such light rail line’’ and
inserting ‘‘the program of interrelated projects
identified in section 3(a)(8)(C)(vii) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act’’; and
(D) by striking ‘‘of such elements’’ and in-
serting ‘‘element of such program of inter-
related projects’’
(2) PROGRAM OF INTERRELATED PROJECTS.—
Section 3(a)(8)(C)(vii) of the Federal Transit Act
(49 U.S.C. App. 1602(a)(8)(C)(vii)) is amended by
striking ‘‘Camp Wisdom’’ and inserting ‘‘Interstate
Route 20, L.B.J. Freeway’’.
(i) SOUTH BOSTON.—Section 3035(j) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(105 Stat. 2130–2131) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$278,000,000’’ each place it
appears and inserting ‘‘$323,000,000’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘the second place it appears’’
after ‘‘striking ‘—’ ’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Funds
made 
available 
for 
the 
South 
Boston 
Piers
Transitway in fiscal year 1994 for alternatives anal-
ysis may also be used for construction.’’.
(j) KANSAS
CITY
LIGHT
RAIL
LINE.—Section
3035(k) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘$1,500,000
in fiscal year 1992, and $4,400,000 in fiscal year 1993’’
and inserting ‘‘$5,900,000’’.
(k) DOWNTOWN ORLANDO CIRCULATOR PROJECT.—
Section 3035(l) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$12,000,000’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘for’’ the second place it ap-
pears and all that follows through the period at the
end and inserting ‘‘and the completion of final de-
sign, construction, land and equipment acquisition,
and related activities for the Downtown Orlando
Circulator project.’’.
(l) 
DETROIT
LIGHT
RAIL
PROJECT.—Section
3035(m) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘not less
than’’ the first place it appears and all that follows
through ‘‘1993,’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.
(m) 
LAKEWOOD-FREEHOLD-MATTAWAN
OR
JAMESBURG RAIL PROJECT.—Section 3035(p) of such
Act is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,800,000’’.
(n) CHARLOTTE
LIGHT
RAIL
STUDY.—Section
3035(r) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘$125,000’’
and all that follows through ‘‘1993’’ and inserting
‘‘$500,000’’.
(o) SAN DIEGO MID COAST FIXED GUIDEWAY
PROJECT.—Section 3035(u) of such Act is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading by striking
‘‘LIGHT RAIL’’ and inserting ‘‘FIXED GUIDEWAY’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘, $2,000,000’’ and all that fol-
lows 
through 
‘‘right-of-way,’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘$42,000,000’’; and
(4) by striking ‘‘Light Rail’’ and inserting
‘‘Fixed Guideway’’.
(p) RAILTRAN COMMUTER RAIL PROJECT.—Sec-
tion 3035(x) of such Act is amended—
(s) JACKSONVILLE AUTOMATED SKYWAY EXPRESS
EXTENSION.—Section 3035(vv) of such Act is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘(vv) JACKSONVILLE AUTOMATED SKYWAY EXPRESS
EXTENSION.—Not later than December 31, 1994, the
Secretary shall negotiate and sign an agreement which
modifies the full funding agreement signed on September
27, 1991, with the Jacksonville Transportation Authority
for phase 1–B of the north segment of the Automated
Skyway Express project to make available $15,000,000 in
already appropriated funds and $35,000,000 under sec-
tion 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act to carry out
construction of the locally preferred alternative for an op-
erable segment of a not to exceed 1.8 mile extension to
such project.’’.
(t) DULLES CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT.—Section
3035(aaa) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘$6,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$16,000,000’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘the completion’’ and all that
follows through ‘‘engineering for’’.
(u) CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT
PROJECT.—Section 3035(bbb) of such Act is amended to
read as follows:
‘‘(bbb) CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT
PROJECT.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall
make available $300,000,000 for the Central Puget Sound
Regional Transit Project.’’.
(v) CANAL STREET CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL.—Section
3035(fff) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘negotiate’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘includes’’ and inserting ‘‘make available’’;
and
(3) by striking ‘‘$4,800,000’’ and all that fol-
lows ‘‘statement for’’ and inserting ‘‘$44,800,000 to
construct’’.
(w) ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.—
(1) SANTA
CRUZ
BUS
FACILITY
CONSOLIDA-
TION.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $4,120,000 for the Santa Cruz
Bus Facility Consolidation project.
(2) SANTA
CRUZ
FIXED
GUIDEWAY.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$4,750,000 for the Santa Cruz Fixed Guideway
project.
(3) SAN FRANCISCO FERRY BUILDING RENOVA-
TION.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $1,250,000 for the San Fran-
cisco Ferry Building Renovation project.
(4) AC TRANSIT BUS IMPROVEMENTS.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$10,000,000 to the Alameda County Transit District
for the purchase of buses.
(5) DENVER
SOUTHWEST
CORRIDOR
LIGHT
RAIL.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $13,000,000 for the Denver
Southwest Corridor Light Rail project.
(6) GRIFFIN LINE TRANSITWAY.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$4,900,000 for the Griffin Line Transitway project.
(7) TAMPA TO LAKELAND COMMUTER RAIL.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of
the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $16,300,000 for the Tampa to Lakeland
Commuter Rail project.
(8) RAVENSWOOD RAPID TRANSIT LINE.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(A) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, and before the formula distribution
of funds under such section, the Secretary shall
make available $20,000,000 to the Chicago Transit
Authority for the reconstruction of track on the
Ravenswood Rapid Transit line between Kimball
Terminal and Clark Junction and between Armitage
Avenue and Tower 18.
(9) FITCHBURG INTERMODAL FACILITY.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$2,250,000 for the Fitchburg Intermodal Facility.
(10) EAST-WEST
TRANSITWAY.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$5,000,000 for the East-West Transitway project in
Montgomery County, Maryland.
(11) MINNEAPOLIS.—From funds provided
under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act,
the Secretary shall make available $20,000,000 for
the Minnesota Central Corridor Light Rail project.
(12) HOBOKEN TERMINAL FACILITY IMPROVE-
MENTS.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(A) of the Federal Transit Act, and before
the formula distribution of funds under such section,
the Secretary shall make available $8,000,000 to re-
habilitate the Hoboken Terminal and Yard Complex
in Hoboken, New Jersey.
(13) WEST 72D STREET TRANSIT STATION.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(A) of the
Federal Transit Act, and before the formula dis-
tribution of funds under such section, the Secretary
shall make available $9,500,000 to refurbish and ex-
pand the West 72d Street Transit Station in New
York, New York.
(14) TREN URBANO LIGHT RAIL LINE.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$40,000,000 for the Tren Urbano Light Rail project
in Puerto Rico.
(15) 
MEMPHIS
RIVERFRONT
LOOP.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
Transit Authority in Huntington, West Virginia, for
the purchase of transit vehicles, equipment, and re-
lated right-of-way facility costs.
(21) ALASKA
MARINE
TRANSPORTATION
SYS-
TEM.—Notwithstanding section 3(a) of the Federal
Transit Act, from funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B), the Secretary shall make available
$20,000,000 to the State of Alaska for the Alaska
Marine Transportation System project.
(22) LONG
BEACH
BUS
PURCHASE.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$3,000,000 to the Long Beach Public Transpor-
tation Company for the purchase of buses and spare
parts.
(23) PALM
DESERT
PEOPLE
MOVER.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$5,000,000 for the Palm Desert People Mover
Project.
(24) LOS
ANGELES/BURBANK/GLENDALE/SAN
FERNANDO VALLEY LIGHT RAIL/INTERMODAL CON-
NECTION.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $10,000,000 for the Los Ange-
(29) SAFETY AND SECURITY PILOT PROJECT.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the
Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $2,750,000 for a safety and security pilot
project in Champaign-Urbana, Rock Island, and
Springfield, Illinois.
(30) METRA WISCONSIN CENTRAL COMMUTER
RAIL
LINE.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $5,000,000 for capital improve-
ments to provide commuter rail service between An-
tioch, Illinois, and Chicago Union Station.
(31) CINCINNATI NORTHEAST/NORTHERN KEN-
TUCKY RAIL LINE.—From funds provided under sec-
tion 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Sec-
retary shall make available $6,000,000 for the Cin-
cinnati Northeast/Northern Kentucky Rail Line
project.
(32) WORCESTER
INTERMODAL
CENTER.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the
Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $20,000,000 for the Union Station Intermodal
Center project.
(33) BOSTON COLLEGE ALTERNATIVE FUELS/
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY BUS DEMONSTRATION
PROJECT.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $1,600,000 to Boston College
for the alternative fuels/environmental efficiency bus
demonstration project.
(34) SHADY
GROVE
TO
FREDERICK
COR-
RIDOR.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $5,000,000 to the State of
Maryland for a corridor study of transit options in
the Shady Grove to Frederick Corridor.
(35) BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR
STUDY.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $10,000,000 to the State of
Maryland for a study of transit corridors in the Bal-
timore and southern Maryland regions.
(36) WEST TRENTON LINE.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Tran-
sit 
Act, 
the 
Secretary 
shall 
make 
available
$10,000,000 to make capital improvements for the
West Trenton Commuter Rail Line.
(37) WHITEHALL
FERRY
TERMINAL.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$20,000,000 for reconstruction of the Whitehall
Ferry Terminal in New York, New York.
(38) BUFFALO
CROSSROADS
STATION.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$9,000,000 to the Niagara Frontier Transportation
Authority for the Crossroads Station project.
(39) COLUMBUS NORTH CORRIDOR/OSU LINK.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of
the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $10,000,000 for the Columbus North Cor-
ridor/OSU Link project.
(40) BAYFRONT
CENTRE
INTERMODAL
COM-
PLEX.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $8,000,000 for the Bayfront
Centre Intermodal Complex project.
(41) ST. LOUIS METRO LINK EXTENSIONS.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of
the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $16,000,000 for the St. Clair extension to
the St. Louis Metro Link light rail transit system,
$2,450,000 for the Cross-County extension to such
system, and $3,450,000 for the St. Charles exten-
sion to such system.
(42) ALBANY
MULTIMODAL
TRANSPORTATION
FACILITY.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(C), the Secretary shall make available
$590,000 for the multimodal transportation facility
in Albany, Oregon.
(43) MIAMI METRORAIL NORTH CORRIDOR EX-
TENSION.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $15,000,000 for the northern
extension of the Metrorail rapid transit system in
Miami, Florida.
(44) VALPARAISO-CHICAGO
COMMUTER
COR-
RIDOR STUDY.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $56,000 to determine the fea-
sibility of restoring commuter rail service between
Valparaiso, Indiana, and Chicago, Illinois.
(x) 1996 OLYMPIC
AND
PARA-OLYMPIC
BUS
GRANTS.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall transfer
$16,000,000 to the program being carried out under sec-
tion 9 of such Act to make available $10,400,000 in cap-
ital and operating grants to public entities loaning transit
vehicles to the 1996 Olympic games and $5,600,000 in
capital and operating grants to public entities loaning
transit vehicles to the 1996 Para-Olympic games. The
Federal share of such grants shall be 100 percent.
(y) CALSTART CONSORTIUM.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act,
the Secretary shall make available $5,000,000 to the
CALSTART Consortium to perform the services described
in section 6071(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
SEC. 
123. 
MULTIYEAR 
CONTRACT 
FOR 
METRO 
RAIL
PROJECT.
Section 3034(b)(3)(A) of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2126)
is amended by striking ‘‘$695,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$720,000,000’’.
TITLE II—TECHNICAL CORREC-
TIONS TO ISTEA AND RELAT-
ED LAWS
SEC. 201. DEFINITIONS.
Section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking the 1st undesignated paragraph of
such section that relates to public lands highways.
SEC. 202. REFERENCES TO DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER SYS-
TEM OF INTERSTATE AND DEFENSE HIGH-
WAYS.
(a) DECLARATION
OF POLICY.—Section 2 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(105 Stat. 1914–1915) is amended—
(1) in the 3d undesignated paragraph by strik-
ing ‘‘National System of’’ and inserting ‘‘Dwight D.
Eisenhower System of’’; and
(2) in the 7th undesignated paragraph by strik-
ing ‘‘Interstate and Defense Highway System’’ and
inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Inter-
state and Defense Highways’’.
(b) COMPLETION OF INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section
1001 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 104 note; 105 Stat. 1915–1916)
is amended in each of subsections (a) and (b) by striking
‘‘National’’.
(c) DEFINITION OF INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN TITLE
23.—The undesignated paragraph of section 101(a) of
title 23, United States Code, relating to the Interstate
System, is amended by striking ‘‘National’’.
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO VEHICLE WEIGHT
LIMITATIONS.—Section 127(a) of title 23, United States
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘National’’ each place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower’’.
(e) VEHICLE LENGTH RESTRICTION.—Section 411(j)
of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (49
U.S.C. App. 2311(j)) is amended in each of paragraphs
(1), (5)(D), and (6)(A) by striking ‘‘National’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower’’.
(f) LONGER COMBINATION VEHICLE DEFINED.—
Section 4007(f) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2153) is amended by
striking ‘‘National’’ and inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisen-
hower’’.
(g) COMMEMORATION.—Section 6012 of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23
U.S.C. 101 note; 105 Stat. 2180–2181) is amended—
(1) in the section heading by striking ‘‘NA-
TIONAL’’; and
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘National’’.
SEC. 203. FEDERAL-AID SYSTEMS.
(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 103(e)(1) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking the next
to the last sentence.
(b) SUBSTITUTE PROJECTS.—Section 103(e)(4) of
such title is amended—
(1) in the last sentence of subparagraph (B) by
striking ‘‘projects on the Federal-aid secondary sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘surface transportation program
projects’’;
(2) in subparagraph (G) by inserting ‘‘and’’ be-
fore ‘‘$240,000,000’’; and
(3) in subparagraph (J)(i) by inserting a
comma after ‘‘October 1, 1991’’.
SEC. 204. APPORTIONMENT.
(a) SET-ASIDE.—Section 104(a) of title 23, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘for the Federal-aid systems’’
and inserting ‘‘for this chapter’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘upon the Federal-aid systems’’
and inserting ‘‘under this chapter’’.
(b) CROSS REFERENCE TO INTERSTATE CONSTRUC-
TION PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Section 104(b)(5)(A) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘118(b)(2)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘118(b)(1)’’.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 104(b)(5)(B)
of such title is amended by striking the comma following
‘‘1984’’ each place it appears.
(d) REPEAL OF URBAN SYSTEM APPORTIONMENT.—
Section 104(b)(6) of such title is repealed.
(e) PLANNING SET-ASIDE.—Section 104(f)(3) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘(j)’’.
(f) TRANSFERABILITY AMONG SAFETY AND BRIDGE
PROGRAMS.—Section 104(g) of such title is amended by
striking ‘‘Not more than’’ and all that follows through
‘‘any other of such sections’’ the second place it appears
and inserting the following: ‘‘Not more than 40 percent
of the amount which is apportioned in any fiscal year to
each State under section 144 or which is reserved for such
fiscal year under section 133(d)(1) only for carrying out
section 130 or 152 may be transferred from the apportion-
ment under section 144 or one of the reservations under
section 133(d)(1) to the apportionment or reservation
under such other section if such a transfer is requested
by the State highway department and is approved by the
Secretary as being in the public interest. The Secretary
may approve the transfer of 100 percent of the apportion-
ment under section 144 or one of the reservations under
section 133(d)(1) to the apportionment or reservation
under such other section’’.
SEC. 205. PROGRAMS OF PROJECTS.
(a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT.—Section 105 of title
23, United States Code, and the item relating to such sec-
tion in the analysis for chapter 1 of such title are each
repealed.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 106(a) of
such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘, as soon as practicable after
program approval,’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘included in an approved pro-
gram’’.
(c) PRIORITY FOR HIGH PRIORITY SEGMENTS OF
CORRIDORS
OF
NATIONAL
SIGNIFICANCE.—Section
1105(g)(7) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Ef-
ficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2036) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(7) PRIORITY FOR HIGH PRIORITY SEGMENTS
OF CORRIDORS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.—In se-
lecting projects for inclusion in a plan or program
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, a
State may give priority to high priority segments of
corridors identified under subsection (c) of this sec-
tion.’’.
SEC. 206. ADVANCE ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 107(a)(2) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘sub-
section (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’.
(b) APPORTIONED FUNDS.—Section 108(a) of such
title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘on any Federal-aid highway’’
and inserting ‘‘for any project eligible for assistance
under this chapter’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘on such highway’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘on such project’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘a road’’ and inserting ‘‘the
project’’.
(c) RIGHT-OF-WAY REVOLVING FUND FUNDS.—Sec-
tion 108(c) of such title is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘highways and
passenger transit facilities on any Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘any project eligible for assist-
ance under this chapter’’; and
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘such project
for the actual construction’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘Secretary’’ the last place it appears and
inserting ‘‘actual construction of such project on
rights-of-way with respect to which funds are ad-
vanced under this subsection, whichever shall occur
first, the right-of-way revolving fund shall be cred-
ited with an amount equal to the Federal share of
the funds advanced, as provided in section 120 of
this title, out of any funds apportioned under this
chapter to the State in which such project is located
and available for obligation for such projects and the
State shall reimburse the Secretary’’.
(d) EARLY ACQUISITION.—Section 108(d)(2)(F) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting
‘‘this title’’.
SEC. 207. STANDARDS.
Section 109 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (h) by striking ‘‘Federal-aid
system’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway’’; and
(2) in subsection (q) by striking ‘‘under sec-
tions’’ and inserting ‘‘under section’’.
SEC. 208. LETTING OF CONTRACTS.
Section 112(f) of title 23, United States Code, relat-
ing to applicability to contracts for projects on the second-
ary system, is repealed.
SEC. 209. PREVAILING RATE OF WAGE.
Section 113 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘highway
projects on’’ and all that follows through ‘‘author-
ized under’’ and inserting ‘‘highway projects on Fed-
eral-aid highways authorized under’’;
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘upon the Fed-
eral-aid systems,’’ and inserting ‘‘on Federal-aid
highways,’’; and
(3) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘of the Fed-
eral-aid systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid high-
way’’.
SEC. 210. CONSTRUCTION.
Section 114 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘highways or
portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway or portion
thereof’’;
(2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘highways
or portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘a Federal-aid highway or por-
tion thereof’’; and
(3) in subsection (b)(3) by striking ‘‘highways
or portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘any Federal-aid highway or
portion thereof’’.
SEC. 211. ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.
Section 115 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS,’’ and inserting ‘‘PROJECT
AP-
PROVAL’’; and
(2) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘134,’’ and the
second comma after ‘‘144’’.
SEC. 212. MAINTENANCE.
Section 116 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘highway’’ before ‘‘project’’ the
first place it appears in each of subsections (a) and
(c);
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘no longer con-
stitutes a part of a Federal-aid system’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘is no longer a Federal-aid highway’’; and
(3) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘the Federal-
aid secondary system’’ and inserting ‘‘a Federal-aid
highway’’.
SEC. 213. CERTIFICATION ACCEPTANCE.
Section 117 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘2000(d)’’ and
inserting ‘‘2000d’’; and
(2) by striking subsection (f), relating to dis-
charge of the Secretary’s responsibilities with respect
to the secondary system.
SEC. 214. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.
(a) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Section 118(b)(1) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘Interstate
construction in a State’’ and inserting ‘‘completion
of the Interstate System in a State’’; and
(2) in the second sentence by inserting ‘‘for
completion of the Interstate System’’ after ‘‘shall be
allocated’’.
(b) SET-ASIDE
FOR INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Section 118(c)(1) of such title is amended by
striking the period at the end of the first sentence and
all that follows through the period at the end of the second
sentence and inserting ‘‘for obligation at the discretion of
the Secretary for projects to complete the Interstate Sys-
tem.’’.
(c) 
SET-ASIDE
FOR
4R 
PROJECTS.—Section
118(c)(2) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘of’’ after
‘‘$64,000,000 for each’’.
SEC. 215. FEDERAL SHARE.
(a) 
INTERSTATE
SYSTEM
PROJECTS.—Section
120(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by in-
serting before ‘‘including a project’’ the following: ‘‘includ-
ing a project the cost for which is included in the 1991
interstate cost estimate and’’.
(b) SAFETY PROJECTS.—Section 120(c) of such title
is amended by striking ‘‘for all the Federal-aid systems’’.
(c) EMERGENCY RELIEF.—The first sentence of sec-
tion 120(e) of such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘system, including’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘, including a highway on’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘on a project on such system’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘and (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘and
(b)’’; and
(4) by striking ‘‘90 days’’ and inserting ‘‘180
days’’.
(d) PLANNING PROJECTS.—Section 120 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(j) PLANNING PROJECTS.—The Federal share pay-
able on account of any project to be carried out with funds
set aside under section 104(f) of this title shall be 80 per-
cent of the costs thereof unless the Secretary determines
that the interest of the Federal-aid highway program
would best be served by decreasing or eliminating the non-
Federal share of such costs.’’.
(e) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 208(2) of
the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development
Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 3338(2)) is amended by striking
‘‘section 120(a) of title 23, United States Code;’’.
SEC. 216. PAYMENT TO STATES FOR CONSTRUCTION.
Section 121 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘After’’ and
inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided in this title,
after’’; and
(2) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘Federal-aid
system’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway’’.
SEC. 217. RELOCATION OF UTILITY FACILITIES.
Section 123(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘on any Federal-aid system’’
and inserting ‘‘eligible for assistance under this
chapter’’; and
(2) by striking the last sentence.
SEC. 218. ADVANCES TO STATES.
Section 124(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘projects on any of the Federal-aid
systems, including the Interstate System, he’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘a project eligible for assistance under this title, the
Secretary’’.
SEC. 219. EMERGENCY RELIEF.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The first sentence of
section 125(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended
by striking all preceding ‘‘Provided’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The Secretary may expend funds from the emer-
gency fund herein authorized for projects for repair or re-
construction on Federal-aid highways in accordance with
the provisions of this chapter:’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 125(b) of
such title is further amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘authorized’’ in the second sen-
tence and all that follows through the period at the
end of such sentence and inserting ‘‘authorized on
Federal-aid highways.’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘the Disaster Relief and Emer-
gency Assistance Act (Public Law 93–288)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act’’.
SEC. 220. APPLICABILITY OF AXLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS.
(a) WISCONSIN STATE ROUTE 78 AND UNITED
STATES ROUTE 51.—Section 127 of title 23, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing new subsection:
‘‘(f) OPERATION OF CERTAIN SPECIALIZED HAULING
VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WISCONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If the
104-mile portion of Wisconsin State Route 78 and United
States Route 51 between Interstate Route 94 near Por-
tage, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin State Route 29 south of
Wausau, Wisconsin, is designated as part of the Interstate
System under section 139(a) of title 23, United States
Code, the single axle, tandem axle, gross vehicle weight,
and bridge formula limits set forth in subsection (a) shall
not apply to the operation on such 104-mile portion of
any vehicle which could legally operate on such 104-mile
portion before the date of the enactment of this sub-
section.’’.
(b) VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS IN THE STATE
OF OHIO.—
(1) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Transportation
shall review the Federal and State commercial motor
vehicle weight limitations applicable to Federal-aid
highways in the State of Ohio.
(2) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—If the Secretary of
Transportation determines, on the basis of the re-
view conducted under paragraph (1), that it is in the
public interest, the Secretary may waive application
of the vehicle weight limitations of section 127(a) of
title 23, United States Code, and of the State cer-
tification requirements of sections 141(b) and 141(c)
of such title, in whole or in part, to highways on the
Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and De-
fense Highways in the State of Ohio for short wheel-
base vehicles for such period as the Secretary deter-
mines may be necessary to permit a reasonable pe-
riod of depreciation for short wheel-base vehicles
purchased before October 1, 1991.
(3) 
MORATORIUM
ON
WITHHOLDING
OF
FUNDS.—Until the Secretary of Transportation
makes a determination relating to the public interest
under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall not with-
hold funds under section 127(a) or 141(c) of title
23, United States Code, from apportionment to the
State of Ohio for failure to comply with such section
with respect to short wheel-base vehicles.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 127 of title
23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘118(b)(1)’’
and inserting ‘‘118(b)(2)’’; and
(2) in subsection (d)(1)(E) by striking ‘‘July 5,
1991’’ and inserting ‘‘July 6, 1991’’.
SEC. 221. TOLL ROADS.
(a) USE OF REVENUES.—Section 129(a)(3) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘all toll
revenues received’’ and all that follows through the period
at the end of the first sentence and inserting the following:
‘‘toll revenues received from operation of the toll facility
will be used for financing and any other obligations in re-
spect of the facility, for reserves, for reasonable return to
investors financing the project (as determined by the
State), and for the costs necessary for the proper oper-
ation and maintenance of the toll facility, including recon-
struction, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation.’’.
(b) REFERENCE TO FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.—The
last sentence of section 129(a)(4) of such title is amended
by striking ‘‘the Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘Fed-
eral-aid highways’’.
(c) LOANS.—Section 129(a)(7) of such title is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘or commit to loan’’ after
‘‘loan’’ the first place it appears;
(2) by striking ‘‘agency’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘entity’’;
(3) by inserting after ‘‘constructing’’ the first
place it appears ‘‘or proposing to construct’’;
(4) by striking ‘‘all Federal environmental re-
quirements have been complied with and permits ob-
tained’’ and inserting ‘‘the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 has been complied with’’;
(5) by inserting ‘‘to a private entity’’ after
‘‘Any such loan’’;
(6) by inserting after the fifth sentence the fol-
lowing new sentence: ‘‘Any such loan to a public en-
tity shall bear interest at such rate as the State de-
termines appropriate.’’; and
(7) by striking ‘‘the time the loan was obli-
gated’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the initial funding
of the loan’’.
(d) CONSTRUCTION OF FERRY BOATS AND FERRY
TERMINAL FACILITIES.—Section 129 of such title is
amended—
(1) in the first sentence of subsection (b) by
striking ‘‘the route of which’’ and all that follows
through the period at the end of such sentence and
inserting ‘‘the route of which has been classified as
a public road and has not been designated as a route
on the Interstate System.’’; and
(2) in subsection (c)(4) by striking ‘‘and’’ pre-
ceding ‘‘repair’’.
(e) PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 129(d) of such title
is amended—
(1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (3) by strik-
ing ‘‘7’’ and inserting ‘‘9’’;
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘State of
Pennsylvania’’ each place it appears and inserting
‘‘States of Pennsylvania and West Virginia’’; and
(3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘the’’ before
‘‘State of Georgia’’.
(f) TREATMENT OF CENTENNIAL BRIDGE, ROCK IS-
LAND, ILLINOIS, AGREEMENT.—For purposes of section
129(a)(6) of title 23, United States Code, the agreement
concerning the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois,
entered into under the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing
the city of Rock Island, Illinois, or its assigns, to con-
struct, maintain, and operate a toll bridge across the Mis-
sissippi River at or near Rock Island, Illinois, and to a
place at or near the city of Davenport, Iowa’’, approved
March 18, 1938 (52 Stat. 110), shall be treated as if such
agreement had been entered into under section 129 of title
23, United States Code, as in effect on December 17,
1991, and may be modified accordingly.
(g) TREATMENT OF I–95 AND PENNSYLVANIA TURN-
PIKE.—For purposes of section 129 of title 23, United
States Code, the project for construction of an interchange
between Interstate Route 95 and the Pennsylvania Turn-
pike shall be treated as a reconstruction project described
in section 129(a)(1)(B) of such title.
SEC. 222. RAIL-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS.
Section 130 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘Except as
provided in subsection (d) of’’ and inserting ‘‘Sub-
ject to’’;
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘entire’’ each
place it appears;
(3) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘except as pro-
vided in subsection (d) of’’ and inserting ‘‘subject
to’’;
(4) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘authorized for
and’’;
(5) in subsection (e) by striking the last sen-
tence;
(6) by striking subsection (f) and redesignating
subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g),
respectively; and
(7) in subsection (f) as so redesignated by strik-
ing ‘‘railroad highway’’ and inserting ‘‘railroad-high-
way’’.
SEC. 223. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM.
(a) STATE CERTIFICATION.—Section 133 of title 23,
United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘subsections
(b) (3) and (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (b)(3)
and (b)(4)’’;
(2) in subsection (d)(3)(B) by striking ‘‘tobe’’
and inserting ‘‘to be’’; and
(3) in subsection (e)(2) by inserting after ‘‘each
State’’ the following: ‘‘or the designated transpor-
tation authority of the State’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1007(b)(1)
of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
of 1991 (105 Stat. 1930) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘104(b)(3)’’ and inserting
‘‘104(b)’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘to read as follows’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘by inserting after paragraph (2) the following
new paragraph’’.
SEC. 224. METROPOLITAN PLANNING.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 134 of title
23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in each of subsections (b)(2), (b)(3), and
(h)(4) by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this
section’’ and inserting ‘‘December 18, 1991’’;
(2) in each of subsections (b)(3)(B) and
(g)(2)(B) by striking ‘‘long-range’’ and inserting
‘‘long range’’;
(3) in subsection (f)(11) by inserting ‘‘pas-
sengers and’’ before ‘‘freight’’;
(4) in subsection (g)(5) by redesignating sub-
paragraphs (i) and (ii) as subparagraphs (A) and
(B); and
(5) in subsection (k) by striking ‘‘the Federal-
Aid Highway Act of 1991’’ and inserting ‘‘this
title’’.
(b) FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED.—Section 134(f)
of such title is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(16) Recreational travel and tourism.’’.
(c) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Section 134(k) of such
title is amended by striking the last sentence.
(d) CONFORMING
CHAPTER
ANALYSIS
AMEND-
MENT.—The analysis for chapter 1 of such title is amend-
ed by striking
‘‘134. Transportation planning in certain urban areas.’’
and inserting
‘‘134. Metropolitan planning.’’.
SEC. 225. STATEWIDE PLANNING.
Section 135 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking paragraph (1)
and inserting the following new paragraph:
‘‘(1) 
The 
transportation 
needs 
identified
through use of the management systems required by
section 303 of this title.’’;
(2) in subsection (c)(5) by inserting after
‘‘nonmetropolitan areas’’ the following: ‘‘, including
the identification of a rural priority local road and
bridge system,’’;
(3) in subsection (c) by striking paragraph (15)
and redesignating paragraphs (16) through (20) as
paragraphs (15) through (19), respectively;
(4) in subsection (c)(18), as so redesignated, by
striking ‘‘commercial motor vehicles’’ and inserting
‘‘passengers and freight’’;
(5) in subsection (d)(3) by striking ‘‘concerns’’
and inserting ‘‘transportation needs’’;
(6) in each of subsections (e) and (f)(1) by in-
serting ‘‘Indian tribal governments,’’ after ‘‘private
providers of transportation,’’; and
(7) in subsection (h)—
(A) by striking ‘‘United States Code,’’ and
inserting ‘‘other Federal laws, and’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting
‘‘this title’’; and
(C) by striking ‘‘or section 8 of such Act,’’
and inserting ‘‘of this title, or section 8 of the
Federal Transit Act,’’.
SEC. 226. CONTROL OF JUNKYARDS.
(a) STRICTER STATE STANDARDS.—Section 136(l) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the
Federal-aid highway systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid
highways’’.
(b) PRIMARY SYSTEM DEFINED.—Section 136 of
such title is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(n) PRIMARY SYSTEM DEFINED.—For purposes of
this section, the term ‘primary system’ means the Federal-
aid primary system in existence on June 1, 1991, and any
highway which is not on such system but which is on the
National Highway System.’’.
SEC. 227. NONDISCRIMINATION.
(a) STATE ASSURANCES.—Section 140(a) of title 23,
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘any of the
Federal-aid systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid high-
ways’’.
(b) TRAINING.—Section 140(b) of such title is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘for the surface transportation
program’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘the bridge program’’.
SEC. 228. ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS.
Section 141(b) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘the Federal-aid primary system’’
and all that follows through ‘‘including’’ and inserting
‘‘Federal-aid highways, including highways on’’.
SEC. 229. AVAILABILITY OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
Section 142 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘the sur-
face’’ and inserting ‘‘surface’’; and
(2) in subsection (f) by striking ‘‘exits’’ and in-
serting ‘‘exists’’.
SEC. 230. HIGHWAY BRIDGE PROGRAM.
(a) SET-ASIDES.—Section 144(g) of title 23, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘103’’ and in-
serting ‘‘1003’’;
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘OFF-SYSTEM
BRIDGES’’ and inserting ‘‘BRIDGES NOT ON FED-
ERAL-AID HIGHWAYS’’;
(3) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘, other than
those on a Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘that
are functionally classified as local or rural minor col-
lectors’’; and
(4) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘bridges not
on a Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘such
bridges’’.
(b) CROSS REFERENCE.—Section 144(i) of such title
is amended by striking ‘‘307(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘307(h)’’.
(c) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING BRIDGE APPOR-
TIONMENT CRITERIA.—The criteria for apportionment of
funds used by the Department of Transportation under
section 144 of title 23, United States Code, as in effect
on September 30, 1991, shall remain in effect until Sep-
tember 30, 1997, or until changed by law, whichever oc-
curs first.
SEC. 231. GREAT RIVER ROAD.
Section 148(a)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘centers of the State’’ and inserting
‘‘centers of the States’’.
SEC. 232. HAZARD ELIMINATION PROGRAM.
Section 152 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘authorized’’
and inserting ‘‘available’’; and
(2) by striking subsections (d) and (e) and re-
designating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as sub-
sections (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
SEC. 233. USE OF SAFETY BELTS AND MOTORCYCLE HEL-
METS.
(a) REFERENCE TO DATE OF ENACTMENT.—Section
153 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘the date of
the enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘De-
cember 31, 1991’’; and
(2) in subsection (i)(3) by striking ‘‘the date of
the enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘De-
cember 31, 1991,’’.
(b) ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS.—Section 153(f)(2) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘at all times’’ each place
it appears.
(c) PENALTIES.—Section 153(h) of such title is
amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘at any time
in’’ and inserting ‘‘by the last day of’’;
(2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘by the last
day of fiscal year 1995 or’’ after ‘‘If,’’;
(3) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘1994,’’ and
inserting ‘‘1995,’’; and
(4) in paragraph (4)(A) by striking ‘‘under sec-
tion 402’’ and inserting ‘‘by this subsection’’.
(d) DEFINITIONS.—Section 153(i) of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(5) STATE.—The term ‘State’ has the mean-
ing such term has under chapter 4 of this title.’’.
SEC. 234. NATIONAL MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT.
(a) EXISTING PROGRAM.—Section 154(a)(1) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘on the
Interstate System’’ and all that follows through ‘‘or more’’
100
and inserting ‘‘described in clause (2) or (3) of this sub-
section’’.
(b) NEW PROGRAM.—Section 1029 of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
1968–1970) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1)(A) by inserting ‘‘of a
State’’ after ‘‘apportionments’’;
(2) in subsection (c)(1)(A) by striking ‘‘if a
State’’ and inserting ‘‘to the apportionment of the
State under section 402 of such title if the State’’;
(3) in subsection (c) by redesignating para-
graphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), re-
spectively; and
(4) by inserting after paragraph (1) of sub-
section (c) the following new paragraph:
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(A) GENERAL RULE.—A State must obli-
gate at least 50 percent of its funds transferred
pursuant to this subsection for a fiscal year for
speed limit enforcement and public information
and education.
‘‘(B) WAIVER.—Upon request of a State,
the Secretary may waive the requirement of
subparagraph (A) for any fiscal year if in the
preceding fiscal year the State was in compli-
101
ance with the speed limit requirements estab-
lished pursuant to paragraph (1).’’.
SEC. 235. MINIMUM ALLOCATION.
Section 157 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘118(b)(2)’’
and inserting ‘‘118(b)(1)’’;
(2) in subsection (a)(3)(A) by striking ‘‘year
1989’’ and inserting ‘‘years 1989’’; and
(3) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating
subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (c) and (d),
respectively.
SEC. 236. NATIONAL MINIMUM DRINKING AGE.
Section 158 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘104(b)(5),
and 104(b)(6)’’ each place it appears and inserting
‘‘104(b)(3), and 104(b)(5)’’;
(2) in subsection (b)(1)(A)(iii) by striking
‘‘104(b)(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘104(b)(3)’’;
(3) 
in 
subsection 
(b)(3)(B) 
by 
striking
‘‘104(b)(5)(B), 
or 
104(b)(6)’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘104(b)(3), or 104(b)(5)(B)’’; and
(4) in each of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) by
striking ‘‘118(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘118’’.
102
SEC. 237. REVOCATION OF DRIVERS’ LICENSES OF INDIVID-
UALS CONVICTED OF DRUG OFFENSES.
Section 159 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended in each of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) by strik-
ing ‘‘118(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘118’’.
SEC. 238. REIMBURSEMENT FOR SEGMENTS OF INTER-
STATE 
SYSTEM 
CONSTRUCTED 
WITHOUT
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.
Section 160 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘The amount’’
and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection (g), the
amount’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(g) PUERTO RICO.—Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision of this section, Puerto Rico shall receive in a fiscal
year 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the amounts appropriated pursu-
ant to subsection (f) for such fiscal year. No State (includ-
ing the District of Columbia) which has a reimbursement
percentage in the table contained in subsection (c) of 0.50
shall have its reimbursement amount in fiscal years 1996
and 1997 reduced as a result of the enactment of the pre-
ceding sentence.’’.
103
SEC. 239. FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY PROGRAM.
(a) PUBLIC LANDS HIGHWAYS ALLOCATION.—Sec-
tion 202(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended
by striking ‘‘66 percent of the remainder’’ and inserting
‘‘the remaining 66 percent’’.
(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Section 203 of such
title is amended by striking the comma preceding ‘‘forest
development’’ each place it appears.
(c) PURPOSES FOR WHICH FUNDS MAY BE USED.—
Section 204(b) of such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘construction and improvement’’
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘planning, re-
search, engineering, and construction’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘construction or improvement’’
and inserting ‘‘planning, research, engineering, or
construction’’.
(d) APPROVAL
OF
INDIAN
RESERVATION
ROAD
PROJECTS.—Section 204(c) of such title is amended by
inserting ‘‘of’’ after ‘‘15 percent’’.
(e) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Section 204 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(k) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, funds available for Federal lands
highway programs shall be treated as obligated if—
104
‘‘(1) the Secretary authorizes engineering and
related work for a particular project; or
‘‘(2) the Secretary approves plans, specifica-
tions, and estimates for procurement of construction
under section 106 or 117 of this title.’’.
(f) 
REFERENCE
TO
PARK
ROADS.—Section
1003(a)(6)(C) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1919) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘HIGHWAYS’’ in the subpara-
graph heading and inserting ‘‘ROADS’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘highways’’ the place it appears
preceding ‘‘$69,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘roads’’.
(g) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1032(b)(2)
(A) of such Act (105 Stat. 1974) is amended by striking
‘‘improvements’’ and inserting ‘‘improvement’’.
SEC. 240. BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAY.
Section 217 of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘pedestrian
walkways and’’ before ‘‘bicycle transportation facili-
ties’’;
(2) in subsection (f) by striking ‘‘and the Fed-
eral share’’ and all that follows through ‘‘80 per-
cent’’;
111
‘‘(9) ASSISTANCE OF OTHER FEDERAL DEPART-
MENTS.—The Secretary may make arrangements
with other Federal departments and agencies for as-
sistance in the preparation of uniform guidelines for
the highway safety programs contemplated by this
subsection and in the administration of such pro-
grams. Such departments and agencies are directed
to cooperate in such preparation and administration,
on a reimbursable basis.
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not ap-
prove a State highway safety program under this
section which does not—
‘‘(A) provide that the Governor of the
State shall be responsible for the administration
of the program through a State highway safety
agency which shall have adequate powers and
be suitably equipped and organized to carry
out, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, such
program;
‘‘(B) authorize political subdivisions of the
State to carry out local highway safety pro-
grams within their jurisdictions as a part of the
State highway safety program if such local
highway safety programs are approved by the