datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2912
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 2, 2004
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 
AN ACT 
To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Tribe 
to determine its membership and form of government.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 2912 RFS 
SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE 
OSAGE TRIBE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows: 
(1) The Osage Tribe is a federally recognized 
tribe based in Pawhuska, Oklahoma. 
(2) The Osage Allotment Act of June 28, 1906 
(34 Stat. 539), states that the ‘‘legal membership’’ 
of the Osage Tribe includes the persons on the Jan-
uary 1, 1906 roll and their children, and that each 
‘‘member’’ on that roll is entitled to a headright 
share in the distribution of funds from the Osage 
mineral estate and an allotment of the surface lands 
of the Osage Reservation. 
(3) Today only Osage Indians who have a 
headright share in the mineral estate are ‘‘mem-
bers’’ of the Osage Tribe. 
(4) Adult Osage Indians without a headright in-
terest cannot vote in Osage government elections 
and are not eligible to seek elective office in the 
Osage Tribe as a matter of Federal law. 
(5) A principal goal of Federal Indian policy is 
to promote tribal self-sufficiency and strong tribal 
government. 
(b) REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE 
OSAGE TRIBE.—
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4968
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 25 McHenry Street in
Rosine, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Of-
fice’’.
HR 2912 RFS 
(1) MEMBERSHIP.—Congress hereby clarifies 
that the term ‘‘legal membership’’ in section 1 of the 
Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of lands and 
funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma Territory, 
and for other purposes’’, approved June 28, 1906 
(34 Stat. 539), means the persons eligible for allot-
ments of Osage Reservation lands and a pro rata 
share of the Osage mineral estate as provided in 
that Act, not membership in the Osage Tribe for all 
purposes. Congress hereby reaffirms the inherent 
sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to determine its 
own membership, provided that the rights of any 
person to Osage mineral estate shares are not dimin-
ished thereby. 
(2) GOVERNMENT.—Notwithstanding section 9 
of the Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of 
lands and funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma 
Territory, and for other purposes’’, approved June 
28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539), Congress hereby reaffirms 
the inherent sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to 
determine its own form of government. 
(3) ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA.—At the re-
quest of the Osage Tribe, the Secretary of the Inte-
HR 2912 RFS 
rior shall assist the Osage Tribe with conducting 
elections and referenda to implement this section.
Passed the House of Representatives June 1, 2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
II 
Calendar No. 697 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2912 
[Report No. 108–343] 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 2, 2004 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 
SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 
Reported by Mr. CAMPBELL, without amendment 
AN ACT 
To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Tribe 
to determine its membership and form of government. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE 
OSAGE TRIBE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows: 
(1) The Osage Tribe is a federally recognized 
tribe based in Pawhuska, Oklahoma. 
(2) The Osage Allotment Act of June 28, 1906 
(34 Stat. 539), states that the ‘‘legal membership’’
of the Osage Tribe includes the persons on the Jan-
uary 1, 1906 roll and their children, and that each 
‘‘member’’ on that roll is entitled to a headright 
share in the distribution of funds from the Osage 
mineral estate and an allotment of the surface lands 
of the Osage Reservation. 
(3) Today only Osage Indians who have a 
headright share in the mineral estate are ‘‘mem-
bers’’ of the Osage Tribe. 
(4) Adult Osage Indians without a headright in-
terest cannot vote in Osage government elections 
and are not eligible to seek elective office in the 
Osage Tribe as a matter of Federal law. 
(5) A principal goal of Federal Indian policy is 
to promote tribal self-sufficiency and strong tribal 
government. 
(b) REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE 
OSAGE TRIBE.— 
(1) MEMBERSHIP.—Congress hereby clarifies 
that the term ‘‘legal membership’’ in section 1 of the 
Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of lands and 
funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma Territory, 
and for other purposes’’, approved June 28, 1906 
(34 Stat. 539), means the persons eligible for allot-
ments of Osage Reservation lands and a pro rata
share of the Osage mineral estate as provided in 
that Act, not membership in the Osage Tribe for all 
purposes. Congress hereby reaffirms the inherent 
sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to determine its 
own membership, provided that the rights of any 
person to Osage mineral estate shares are not dimin-
ished thereby. 
(2) GOVERNMENT.—Notwithstanding section 9 
of the Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of 
lands and funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma 
Territory, and for other purposes’’, approved June 
28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539), Congress hereby reaffirms 
the inherent sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to 
determine its own form of government. 
(3) ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA.—At the re-
quest of the Osage Tribe, the Secretary of the Inte-
rior shall assist the Osage Tribe with conducting 
elections and referenda to implement this section.
Calendar No. 697 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2912 
[Report No. 108–343] 
AN ACT 
To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the 
Osage Tribe to determine its membership and 
form of government. 
SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 
Reported without amendment
(i) the best current practices in the devel-
opment, purchase, and maintenance of medical 
information technology; and 
(ii) currently existing legal requirements 
for communication standards. 
(B) Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, recommendations for a uni-
form health information system interface, and meth-
ods for its adoption, to ensure compatibility between 
and among old and new information systems. 
(C) Recommendations for health and healthcare 
data standards (such as vocabulary and messaging), 
communications standards, and other medical stand-
ards (including a common lexicon) necessary to 
achieve the interoperability of health information 
systems. 
(2) Coordination of the evolution of the national 
health information infrastructure and working with 
other key stakeholders in the public and private sec-
tors to develop a strategic plan that will ensure the 
interoperability of all elements of such infrastruc-
ture. 
(3) Coordination of spending across Federal 
agencies relating to the establishment of such infra-
structure.
or greater than the amount appropriated for salaries 
and expenses of the Food and Drug Administration 
for the first applicable fiscal year multiplied by the 
adjustment factor applicable to the fiscal year in-
volved, except that in making determinations under 
this paragraph for the fiscal years involved there 
shall be excluded—
‘‘(A) the amounts appropriated under sub-
section (f)(2) for the fiscal years involved; and 
‘‘(B) the amounts appropriated under sec-
tion 736(g) for such fiscal years. 
‘‘(2) AUTHORITY.—If under paragraph (1) the 
Secretary does not have authority to assess fees 
under subsection (a) during a portion of a fiscal 
year, but does at a later date in such fiscal year 
have such authority, the Secretary, notwithstanding 
the due date under such subsection for fees, may as-
sess and collect such fees at any time in such fiscal 
year, without any modification in the rate of the 
fees. 
‘‘(f) CREDITING AND AVAILABILITY OF FEES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Fees collected for a fiscal 
year pursuant to subsection (a) shall be credited to 
the appropriation account for salaries and expenses 
of the Food and Drug Administration and shall be
‘‘(l) AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2010 $80,000,000. 
Such sums shall remain available until expended. 
‘‘(m) PROGRAM EVALUATION.—Not later than 5 
years after the date of enactment of this section, the Sec-
retary shall—
‘‘(1) conduct a study to evaluate the pilot pro-
gram authorized by this section; and 
‘‘(2) submit to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent-
atives and the Committee on Banking, Housing and 
Urban Affairs of the Senate a report describing the 
results of the study.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘5539. Flexibility incentive grant pilot program.’’.
Æ
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4968
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as
the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
ated as a result of the creation of a genetically engineered 
food (as defined in paragraph (nn)), other than a genetic 
construct, protein, vector, promoter, or marker system or 
other appropriate term for which an application under sec-
tion 505 or 512 has been filed. For purposes of this Act, 
the term ‘genetic food additive’ means a genetic construct, 
protein, vector, promoter, or marker system or other ap-
propriate term that is so included.’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(nn)(1) The term ‘genetically engineered food’ 
means food that contains or was produced with a geneti-
cally engineered material. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘genetically engineered material’ 
means material derived from any part of a genetically en-
gineered organism, without regard to whether the altered
molecular or cellular characteristics of the organism are 
detectable in the material. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘genetically engineered organism’ 
means—
‘‘(A) an organism that has been altered at the 
molecular or cellular level by means that are not 
possible under natural conditions or processes (in-
cluding but not limited to recombinant DNA and 
RNA techniques, cell fusion, microencapsulation, 
macroencapsulation, gene deletion and doubling, in-
‘‘(C) effective June 1, 2006, a selective marker 
is used with respect to the additive, the selective 
marker will remain in the food involved when the 
food is marketed, and the selective marker inhibits 
the function of one or more antibiotics.’’. 
(7) ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS.—Section 409(c) 
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as 
amended by paragraph (6), is amended by adding at 
the end the following paragraph: 
‘‘(9)(A) In determining the safety for use of genetic 
food additives, the Secretary may (directly or through con-
tract) conduct investigations of such additives for pur-
poses of supplementing the information provided to the 
Secretary pursuant to petitions under subsection (b)(1). 
‘‘(B) To provide the Congress with a periodic inde-
pendent, external review of the Secretary’s formulation of 
the approval process under paragraph (1)(A) that relates 
to genetic food additives, the Secretary shall enter into 
an agreement with the Institute of Medicine. Such agree-
ment shall provide that, if the Institute of Medicine has 
any concerns regarding the approval process, the Institute 
of Medicine will submit to the Congress a report describ-
ing such concerns.’’.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2919
To assign liability for injury caused by genetically engineered organisms. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 25, 2003
Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. LEE, Mr. CON-
YERS, Mr. OLVER, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA´, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. NADLER, 
Mr. OWENS, Ms. VELA´ZQUEZ, Ms. WATERS, Ms. WATSON, and Ms. 
WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the juris-
diction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To assign liability for injury caused by genetically engineered 
organisms.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Genetically Engineered 
Organism Liability Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following:
(1) The negative consequences of genetically en-
gineered crops may impact farmers who grow these 
crops, neighbor farmers who do not grow these 
crops, and consumers. 
(2) Biotech companies are selling a technology 
that is being commercialized ahead of the new and 
unknown science of genetic engineering. 
(3) Farmers may suffer from crop failures, 
neighbor and nearby farmers may suffer from cross 
pollination, increased insect resistance, and un-
wanted volunteer genetically engineered plants, and 
consumers may suffer from health and environ-
mental impacts. 
(4) Therefore, biotech companies should be 
found liable for the failures of genetically engineered 
crops when they arise. 
SEC. 3. LIABILITY. 
(a) CAUSE OF ACTION.—A biotech company is liable 
to any party injured by the release of a genetically engi-
neered organism into the environment if that injury re-
sults from that genetic engineering. The prevailing plain-
tiff in an action under this subsection may recover reason-
able attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses as a part 
of the costs.
(b) INDEMNITY.—For the purposes of subsection (a), 
the term ‘‘injury’’ includes any liability of a person who 
uses that organism in accordance with applicable Federal 
and other law, if that liability arises from that use. 
(c) NOT WAIVABLE.—The liability created by sub-
section (a) may not be waived or otherwise avoided by con-
tract. 
(d) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 
‘‘biotech company’’ means a person—
(1) engaged in the business of genetically engi-
neering an organism; or 
(2) obtaining the patent rights to such an orga-
nism for the purposes of commercial exploitation of 
that organism.
Æ
‘‘(c) EXPENDITURES FROM TRUST FUND.—Amounts 
in the Sustainable Agriculture Trust Fund shall be avail-
able, as provided in appropriation Acts, only for grants 
under sections 3 and 4 of the Real Solutions to World 
Hunger Act of 2003.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions for such subchapter A is amended by adding 
at the end the following new item:
‘‘Sec. 9511. Sustainable Agriculture Trust Fund.’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 291
To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the mandatory minimum 
penalties provided for possessing, brandishing, or discharging a firearm 
during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 8, 2003
Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 
mandatory minimum penalties provided for possessing, 
brandishing, or discharging a firearm during and in rela-
tion to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN THE MANDATORY MINIMUM PEN-
ALTIES PROVIDED FOR POSSESSING, BRAN-
DISHING, OR DISCHARGING A FIREARM DUR-
ING AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIO-
LENCE OR DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME. 
Section 924(c)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended—
(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘5’’ and inserting 
‘‘10’’; 
(2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘7’’ and inserting 
‘‘15’’; and 
(3) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘10’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘20’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2922
To amend the Small Business Act to provide additional grants to small 
business development centers located in high unemployment districts. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 25, 2003
Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA´ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Small Business 
A BILL 
To amend the Small Business Act to provide additional 
grants to small business development centers located in 
high unemployment districts.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Out-
reach Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL GRANT TO ASSIST SMALL BUSINESS 
DEVELOPMENT CENTERS IN HIGH UNEM-
PLOYMENT DISTRICTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 21(a) of the Small Busi-
ness Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(7) ADDITIONAL
GRANT
TO
ASSIST
SMALL 
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS IN HIGH UNEM-
PLOYMENT DISTRICTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any applicant that is 
funded by the Administration as a Small Busi-
ness Development Center and that is located in 
a high unemployment district may apply for an 
additional grant to be used solely to promote 
programs of the Small Business Administration 
and programs of other government agencies 
that promote the growth and development of 
small businesses. 
‘‘(B) HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT AREAS.—For 
purposes of subparagraph (A), an applicant 
shall be considered to be located in a high un-
employment district if the applicant is located 
in a district of the Small Business Administra-
tion in which the unemployment rate is greater 
than the national average (as determined by the 
Administrator using the Bureau of Labor Sta-
115) is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) TERRITORIES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In lieu of the amounts de-
ducted under section 104(b)(1) of title 23, United 
States Code, there shall be available from the High-
way Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Ac-
count) for the Virgin Islands, Guam, American 
Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands $15,166,667 for the period of Octo-
ber 1, 2003, through February 29, 2004. 
‘‘(2) CONTRACT
AUTHORITY.—Funds made 
available by this subsection shall be available for ob-
ligation in the same manner as if the funds were ap-
portioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States 
Code, and shall be subject to a limitation on obliga-
tions for Federal-aid highways and highway safety 
construction programs.’’. 
(e) ALASKA HIGHWAY.—Section 1101 of such Act is 
further amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(e) ALASKA HIGHWAY.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In lieu of the amounts de-
ducted under section 104(b)(1) of title 23, United 
States Code, there shall be available from the High-
way Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Ac-
tistics’ most recent local area unemployment 
statistics or the official unemployment statistics 
of a State government). 
‘‘(C) GRANT APPLICATIONS.—An applicant 
for a grant under subparagraph (A) shall sub-
mit to the Administrator an application in the 
form and containing the information that the 
Administrator requires. The Administrator may 
establish a deadline for the submission of such 
applications. 
‘‘(D) APPLICABILITY OF GRANT REQUIRE-
MENTS.—An applicant for a grant under sub-
paragraph (A) shall comply with all of the re-
quirements of this section, except that the 
matching funds requirements of paragraph 
(4)(A) shall not apply. 
‘‘(E) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF GRANTS.—No 
applicant may receive more than $100,000 in 
grants under this paragraph in a fiscal year. 
‘‘(F) PRIORITY FOR APPLICANTS IN HIGH 
UNEMPLOYMENT
DISTRICTS.—In 
selecting 
among applicants for grants under this para-
graph, the Administrator shall give priority to 
applicants located in the districts with the high-
est unemployment rates.
‘‘(G) 
AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIA-
TIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated 
to carry out this paragraph $5,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2003. 
‘‘(H) FUNDING LIMITATIONS.—
‘‘(i) NONAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN 
LIMITATIONS.—Funding under this para-
graph shall be in addition to the dollar 
program limitations specified in paragraph 
(4). 
‘‘(ii) 
LIMITATION
ON
USE
OF 
FUNDS.—The Administration may carry 
out this paragraph only with amounts ap-
propriated in advance specifically to carry 
out this paragraph.’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2923
To amend title 23, United States Code, to require periodic testing of the 
competency of drivers over age 79, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 25, 2003
Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to require periodic 
testing of the competency of drivers over age 79, and 
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. TESTING OF OLDER DRIVERS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 1 of title 
23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘§ 165. Testing of older drivers 
‘‘(a) WITHHOLDING OF APPORTIONMENTS FOR NON-
COMPLIANCE.—
‘‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 2006.—The Secretary shall 
withhold 5 percent of the amount required to be ap-
portioned to any State under each of paragraphs 
(1), (3), and (4) of section 104(b) on October 1, 
2005, if the State does not meet the requirement of 
paragraph (3) on that date. 
‘‘(2) THEREAFTER.—The Secretary shall with-
hold 10 percent of the amount required to be appor-
tioned to any State under each of paragraphs (1), 
(3), and (4) of section 104(b) on October 1, 2006, 
and on October 1 of each fiscal year thereafter, if 
the State does not meet the requirement of para-
graph (3) on that date. 
‘‘(3) MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.—A State meets 
the requirement of this paragraph if the State re-
quires that any individual over age 79 successfully 
complete a test to determine the competency of the 
individual to operate a motor vehicle as a condition 
of issuing a driver’s license to the individual or re-
newing the driver’s license of the individual. 
‘‘(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY; EFFECT OF COMPLI-
ANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE.—
‘‘(1) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY OF WITHHELD 
FUNDS.—
177
Entry number 
Date of entry 
Date of liquidation 
110–70115199
10/25/97
09/04/98
110–70190978
11/08/97
09/18/98
110–70192990
11/08/97
09/18/98
110–70198906
11/15/97
09/25/98
110–70198914
11/15/97
09/25/98
110–70204233
11/29/97
10/09/98
110–70204266
11/22/97
10/02/98
110–75399046
12/19/97
10/30/98
110–75399103
01/04/98
11/20/98
110–75481455
01/24/98
12/04/98
110–75485563
01/24/98
12/04/98
110–75494953
02/07/98
12/18/98
110–04901383
07/11/97
05/22/98
110–33326985
07/07/97
05/22/98
110–63019333
07/11/97
05/22/98
110–63821993
06/07/97
04/17/98
110–66600378
06/20/97
05/01/98
110–66601004
06/20/97
05/01/98
110–66603380
06/20/97
05/01/98
110–66625441
07/07/97
05/22/98
110–66626951
07/07/97
05/22/98
110–68175825
08/04/97
06/19/98
110–68182938
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68184140
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68184918
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68184926
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68184934
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68184942
08/11/97
06/26/98
110–68229994
09/08/97
07/24/98
110–68230000
09/08/97
07/24/98
110–68230232
09/03/97
07/17/98
110–70009715
09/22/97
08/07/98
110–70024698
10/07/98
08/21/98
110–70028764
10/13/97
08/28/98
110–70028772
10/13/97
08/28/98
110–70103625
10/30/98
09/11/98
110–70186810
11/13/97
09/25/98
110–70190937
11/26/97
10/09/98
110–70192362
11/19/97
10/02/98
110–70199151
11/26/97
10/09/98
110–70204555
12/04/97
10/16/98
110–70204563
12/04/97
10/16/98
110–70206360
12/06/97
10/23/98
110–75399079
01/07/98
11/20/98
110–75492627
02/11/98
12/28/98
110–75492635
02/11/98
12/28/98
110–14975204
09/15/98
07/30/99
110–20848643
05/19/99
05/31/00
110–20988472
06/20/99
05/05/00
110–20993589
06/20/99
05/05/00
110–75485126
02/11/98
12/28/98
110–75793405
07/16/98
05/28/99
110–75793611
08/04/98
06/18/99
110–75931278
08/16/98
07/02/99