†
HR 1585 EAS
ment of the Army and the Environmental Protection
Agency for the Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site
in March 1999.
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Any payment under sub-
section (a) shall be made using funds authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 301(16) for operation and mainte-
nance for Environmental Restoration, Defense-wide.
(c) USE OF FUNDS.—The Environmental Protection
Agency shall use the amount transferred under subsection
(a) to pay costs incurred by the Agency at the Moses Lake
Wellfield Superfund Site.
SEC. 312. REIMBURSEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC-
TION AGENCY FOR CERTAIN COSTS IN CON-
NECTION WITH THE ARCTIC SURPLUS SUPER-
FUND SITE, FAIRBANKS, ALASKA.
(a) AUTHORITY TO REIMBURSE.—
(1) TRANSFER AMOUNT.—Using funds described
in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may, not-
withstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States
Code, transfer not more than $186,625.38 to the Haz-
ardous Substance Superfund.
(2) PURPOSE
OF
REIMBURSEMENT.—The pay-
ment under paragraph (1) is to reimburse the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency for costs incurred pur-
suant to the agreement known as ‘‘In the Matter of
†
HR 1585 EAS
Arctic Surplus Superfund Site, U.S. EPA Docket
Number 
CERCLA–10–2003–0114: 
Administrative
Order on Consent for Remedial Design and Remedial
Action,’’ entered into by the Department of Defense
and the Environmental Protection Agency on Decem-
ber 11, 2003.
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Any payment under sub-
section (a) shall be made using funds authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 301(16) for operation and mainte-
nance for Environmental Restoration, Defense-wide.
(c) USE OF FUNDS.—The Environmental Protection
Agency shall use the amount transferred under subsection
(a) to pay costs incurred by the Agency pursuant to the
agreement described in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
SEC. 313. PAYMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY OF STIPULATED PENALTIES IN CON-
NECTION WITH JACKSON PARK HOUSING
COMPLEX, WASHINGTON.
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS.—
(1) TRANSFER AMOUNT.—Using funds described
in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy may, not-
withstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States
Code, transfer not more than $40,000.00 to the Haz-
ardous Substance Superfund.
†
HR 1585 EAS
(2) PURPOSE
OF
TRANSFER.—The payment
under paragraph (1) is to pay a stipulated penalty
assessed by the Environmental Protection Agency on
October 25, 2005, against the Jackson Park Housing
Complex, Washington, for the failure by the Navy to
timely submit a draft final Phase II Remedial Inves-
tigation Work Plan for the Jackson Park Housing
Complex Operable Unit (OU–3T–JPHC) pursuant to
a schedule included in an Interagency Agreement
(Administrative 
Docket 
No. 
CERCLA–10–2005–
0023).
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Any payment under sub-
section (a) shall be made using funds authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 301(14) for operation and mainte-
nance for Environmental Restoration, Navy.
(c) USE OF FUNDS.—The amount transferred under
subsection (a) shall be used by the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency to pay the penalty described under paragraph
(2) of such subsection.
SEC. 314. REPORT ON CONTROL OF THE BROWN TREE
SNAKE.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis), an
invasive species, is found in significant numbers on
military installations and in other areas on Guam,
†
HR 1585 EAS
and constitutes a serious threat to the ecology of
Guam.
(2) If introduced into Hawaii, the Common-
wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the conti-
nental United States, the brown tree snake would pose
an immediate and serious economic and ecological
threat.
(3) The most probable vector for the introduction
of the brown tree snake into Hawaii, the Common-
wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the conti-
nental United States is the movement from Guam of
military aircraft, personnel, and cargo, including the
household goods of military personnel.
(4) It is probable that the movement of military
aircraft, personnel, and cargo, including the house-
hold goods of military personnel, from Guam to Ha-
waii, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is-
lands, or the continental United States will increase
significantly coincident with the increase in the num-
ber of military units and personnel stationed on
Guam.
(5) Current policies, programs, procedures, and
dedicated resources of the Department of Defense and
of other departments and agencies of the United
States may not be sufficient to adequately address the
†
HR 1585 EAS
increasing threat of the introduction of the brown tree
snake from Guam into Hawaii, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, or the continental
United States.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the following:
(1) The actions currently being taken (including
the resources being made available) by the Depart-
ment of Defense to control, and to develop new or ex-
isting techniques to control, the brown tree snake on
Guam and to ensure that the brown tree snake is not
introduced into Hawaii, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Island, or the continental United
States as a result of the movement from Guam of
military aircraft, personnel, and cargo, including the
household goods of military personnel.
(2) Current plans for enhanced future actions,
policies, and procedures and increased levels of re-
sources in order to ensure that the projected increase
of military personnel stationed on Guam does not in-
crease the threat of introduction of the brown tree
snake from Guam into Hawaii, the Commonwealth of
†
HR 1585 EAS
the Northern Mariana Islands, or the continental
United States.
Subtitle C—Program Requirements,
Restrictions, and Limitations
SEC. 321. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN DEFENSE INFORMA-
TION SYSTEMS AGENCY WORKING CAPITAL
FUND FOR TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES TO DE-
FENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds in the Defense Information
Systems Agency Working Capital Fund may be used for
expenses directly related to technology upgrades to the De-
fense Information Systems Network.
(b) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN PROJECTS.—Funds may
not be used under subsection (a) for—
(1) any significant technology insertion to the
Defense Information Systems Network; or
(2) any component with an estimated total cost
in excess of $500,000.
(c) LIMITATION IN FISCAL YEAR PENDING TIMELY RE-
PORT.—If in any fiscal year the report required by para-
graph (1) of subsection (d) is not submitted by the date
specified in paragraph (2) of subsection (d), funds may not
be used under subsection (a) in such fiscal year during the
period—
†
HR 1585 EAS
(1) beginning on the date specified in paragraph
(2) of subsection (d); and
(2) ending on the date of the submittal of the re-
port under paragraph (1) of subsection (d).
(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Defense
Information Systems Agency shall submit to the con-
gressional defense committees each fiscal year a report
on the use of the authority in subsection (a) during
the preceding fiscal year.
(2) DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL.—The report re-
quired by paragraph (1) in a fiscal year shall be sub-
mitted not later than 60 days after the date of the
submittal to Congress of the budget of the President
for the succeeding fiscal year pursuant to section 1105
of title 31, United States Code.
(e) SUNSET.—The authority in subsection (a) shall ex-
pire on October 1, 2011.
SEC. 322. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR
CONTRACT 
PERFORMANCE 
OF 
SECURITY
GUARD FUNCTIONS.
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (c) of section 332 of the
Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314) is amended by striking
†
HR 1585 EAS
‘‘September 30, 2009’’ both places it appears and inserting
‘‘September 30, 2012’’.
(b) LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 2010 THROUGH
2012.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the
end;
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and
inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new para-
graphs:
‘‘(4) for fiscal year 2010, the number equal to 70
percent of the total number of such personnel em-
ployed under such contracts on October 1, 2006;
‘‘(5) for fiscal year 2011, the number equal to 60
percent of the total number of such personnel em-
ployed under such contracts on October 1, 2006; and
‘‘(6) for fiscal year 2012, the number equal to 50
percent of the total number of such personnel em-
ployed under such contracts on October 1, 2006.’’.
SEC. 323. REPORT ON INCREMENTAL COST OF EARLY 2007
ENHANCED DEPLOYMENT.
Section 323(b)(2) of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–
364; 10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended—
†
HR 1585 EAS
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; and’’
and inserting a semicolon;
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period
at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(C) each of the military departments for
the additional incremental cost resulting from
the additional deployment of forces to Iraq and
Afghanistan above the levels deployed to such
countries on January 1, 2007.’’.
SEC. 324. INDIVIDUAL BODY ARMOR.
(a) ASSESSMENT.—The Director of Operational Test
and Evaluation and the Director of Defense Research and
Engineering shall jointly conduct an assessment of various
domestic technological approaches for body armor systems
for protection against ballistic threats at or above military
requirements.
(b) REPORT.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Direc-
tor of Operational Test and Evaluation and the Di-
rector of Defense Research and Engineering shall
jointly submit to the Secretary of Defense, and to the
†
HR 1585 EAS
congressional defense committees, a report on the as-
sessment required by subsection (a).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under
paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a detailed comparative analysis and as-
sessment of the technical approaches covered by
the assessment under subsection (a), including
the technical capability, feasibility, military
utility, and cost of each such approach; and
(B) such other matters as the Director of
Operational Test and Evaluation and the Direc-
tor of Defense Research and Engineering jointly
consider appropriate.
(3) FORM.—The report submitted under para-
graph (1) to the congressional defense committees
shall be submitted in both classified and unclassified
form.
Subtitle D—Workplace and Depot
Issues
SEC. 341. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ARMY INDUS-
TRIAL FACILITIES TO ENGAGE IN COOPERA-
TIVE ACTIVITIES WITH NON-ARMY ENTITIES.
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 4544 of title
10, United States Code, is amended—
†
HR 1585 EAS
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the
following: ‘‘This authority may be used to enter into
not more than eight contracts or cooperative agree-
ments.’’; and
(2) in subsection (k), by striking ‘‘2009’’ and in-
serting ‘‘2014’’.
(b) REPORTS.—
(1) ANNUAL REPORT ON USE OF AUTHORITY.—
The Secretary of the Army shall submit to Congress
at the same time the budget of the President is sub-
mitted to Congress for fiscal years 2009 through 2016
under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, a
report on the use of the authority provided under sec-
tion 4544 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) ANALYSIS OF USE OF AUTHORITY.—Not later
than September 30, 2012, the Secretary of the Army
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report assessing the advisability of making such au-
thority permanent and eliminating the limitation on
the number of contracts or cooperative arrangements
that may be entered into pursuant to such authority.
SEC. 342. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF ARSENAL SUPPORT
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 343 of the
Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for
†
HR 1585 EAS
Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–
398; 10 U.S.C. 4551 note) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal
years 2001 through 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2001
through 2010’’.
(b) EXTENSION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—The
second sentence in subsection (g)(1) of such section is
amended to read as follows: ‘‘No report is required after
fiscal year 2010.’’.
SEC. 343. REPORTS ON NATIONAL GUARD READINESS FOR
DOMESTIC EMERGENCIES.
(a) ANNUAL
REPORTS
ON
EQUIPMENT.—Section
10541(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
‘‘(9) An assessment of the extent to which the Na-
tional Guard possesses the equipment required to re-
spond to domestic emergencies, including large scale,
multi-State disasters and terrorist attacks.
‘‘(10) An assessment of the shortfalls, if any, in
National Guard equipment throughout the United
States, and an assessment of the effect of such short-
falls on the capacity of the National Guard to re-
spond to domestic emergencies.
‘‘(11) Strategies and investment priorities for
equipment for the National Guard to ensure that the
National Guard possesses the equipment required to
†
HR 1585 EAS
respond in a timely and effective way to domestic
emergencies.’’.
(b) INCLUSION OF NATIONAL GUARD READINESS IN
QUARTERLY PERSONNEL AND UNIT READINESS REPORT.—
Section 482 of such title is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and (e)’’ and
inserting ‘‘(e), and (f)’’;
(2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection
(g);
(3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following
new subsection (f):
‘‘(f) READINESS OF NATIONAL GUARD TO PERFORM
CIVIL SUPPORT MISSIONS.—(1) Each report shall also in-
clude an assessment of the readiness of the National Guard
to perform tasks required to support the National Response
Plan for support to civil authorities.
‘‘(2) Any information in a report under this subsection
that is relevant to the National Guard of a particular State
shall also be made available to the Governor of that State.’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
sections (a) and (b) shall apply with respect to reports sub-
mitted after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As part of the budget jus-
tification materials submitted to Congress in support
†
HR 1585 EAS
of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2009 (as
submitted under section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on ac-
tions taken by the Secretary to achieve the implemen-
tation of the amendments made by this section.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph
(1) shall include a description of the mechanisms to
be utilized by the Secretary for assessing the per-
sonnel, equipment, and training readiness of the Na-
tional Guard, including the standards and measures
that will be applied and mechanisms for sharing in-
formation on such matters with the Governors of the
States.
SEC. 344. SENSE OF SENATE ON THE AIR FORCE LOGISTICS
CENTERS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Senate makes the following find-
ings:
(1) Air Force Air Logistics Centers have served
as a model of efficiency and effectiveness in providing
integrated sustainment (depot maintenance, supply
management, and product support) for fielded weap-
on systems within the Department of Defense. This
success has been founded in the integration of these
dependent processes.
†
HR 1585 EAS
(2) Air Force Air Logistics Centers have em-
braced best practices, technology changes, and process
improvements, and have successfully managed in-
creased workload while at the same time reducing
personnel.
(3) Air Force Air Logistics Centers continue to
successfully sustain an aging aircraft fleet that is per-
forming more flying hours, with less aircraft, than at
any point in the last thirty years.
(4) The purpose of the Global Logistics Support
Center is to apply an enterprise approach to supply
chain management to eliminate redundancies and
improve efficiencies across the Air Force in order to
best provide capable aircraft to the warfighter.
(5) The Air Force is working diligently to iden-
tify means to create further efficiencies in the Air
Force logistics network.
(b) SENSE OF SENATE.—It is the sense of the Senate
that the Air Force should work closely with Congress as the
Air Force continues to develop and implement the Global
Logistics Support Center concept.
†
HR 1585 EAS
Subtitle E—Other Matters
SEC. 351. ENHANCEMENT OF CORROSION CONTROL AND
PREVENTION FUNCTIONS WITHIN DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) OFFICE OF CORROSION POLICY AND OVERSIGHT.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Section 2228 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended—
(A) in the section heading, by striking
‘‘Military equipment and infrastruc-
ture: prevention and mitigation of cor-
rosion’’ and inserting ‘‘Office of Corro-
sion Policy and Oversight’’; and
(B) by amending subsection (a) to read as
follows:
‘‘(a) OFFICE AND DIRECTOR.—(1) There is an Office
of Corrosion Policy and Oversight within the Office of the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
and Logistics.
‘‘(2) The Office shall be headed by a Director of Corro-
sion Policy and Oversight (in this section referred to as the
‘Director’), who shall be assigned to such position by the
Under Secretary from among civilian employees of the De-
partment of Defense with the qualifications described in
paragraph (3). The Director is the senior official respon-
sible in the Department of Defense to the Secretary of De-