238
(5) Demonstration of technologies for non-
structural measures to reduce destructive impacts of 
flooding. 
(c) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—The non-Federal share of 
the cost of assistance provided under subsection (a) shall 
be 50 percent. 
(d) PROJECT LOCATIONS.—The locations referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following: 
(1) Cucamonga basin, Upland, California. 
(2) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida. 
(3) Big Creek watershed, Roswell, Georgia. 
(4) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chat-
tahoochee, Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Riv-
ers lying within the counties of Bartow, Cherokee, 
Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, 
Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Paulding, 
Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia. 
(5) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois. 
(6) Amite River basin, Louisiana. 
(7) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Par-
ish and Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana. 
(8) Red River watershed, Louisiana. 
(9) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts. 
(10) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska. 
(11) Rio Grande watershed, New Mexico.
239
(12) Marlboro Township, New Jersey. 
(13) Buffalo River watershed, New York. 
(14) Cattaragus Creek watershed, New York. 
(15) Eighteenmile Creek watershed, Niagara 
County, New York. 
(16) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, 
Greene, Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York. 
(17) Genesee River watershed, New York. 
(18) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and 
New Jersey. 
(19) Long Island Sound watershed, New York. 
(20) Oswego River basin, New York. 
(21) Ramapo River watershed, New York. 
(22) Tonawanda Creek watershed, New York. 
(23) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio. 
(24) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio. 
(25) Those portions of the watersheds of the Bea-
ver, Upper Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, 
Kiskiminetas, Lower Monongahela, Youghiogheny, 
Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying within the 
counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
Pennsylvania. 
(26) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania. 
(27) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, 
Pennsylvania.
240
(28) Sauk River basin, Washington. 
(29) Greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin. 
(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$15,000,000. 
SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY. 
(a) ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may provide assist-
ance to enhance dam safety at the following locations: 
(1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho. 
(A) Hamilton Dam, Saginaw River, Flint, 
Michigan. 
(B) Candor Dam, Candor, New York. 
(C) State Dam, Auburn, New York. 
(D) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York. 
(E) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
Pennsylvania. 
(F) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsyl-
vania. 
(G) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsyl-
vania. 
(H) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery Coun-
ty, Pennsylvania. 
(b) SPECIAL RULE.—The assistance provided under 
subsection (a) for State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be 
for a project for rehabilitation in accordance with the report
241
on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake Outlet, New 
York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible. 
(c) FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.—It is the sense of 
Congress that the Secretary should immediately carry out 
a project to remedy the situation at Fern Ridge Dam, Or-
egon, due to the rapid deterioration of the dam. Cost shar-
ing for the project shall be as provided by section 1203 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
467n). 
(d) KEHLY
RUN
DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.—Section 
504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking 
‘‘Dams’’ and inserting ‘‘Dams No. 1–5’’. 
(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection (a) 
$6,000,000. 
SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon request of a non-Federal in-
terest, the Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity 
and effectiveness of a project for flood damage reduction 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project does not 
meet such minimum standards as the Secretary may estab-
lish and, absent action by the Secretary, the project will 
fail, the Secretary may take such action as may be nec-
242
essary to restore the integrity and effectiveness of the 
project. 
(b) PRIORITY.—The Secretary shall evaluate under 
subsection (a) the following projects: 
(1) Project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas 
River Levees, river mile 205 to river mile 308.4, Ar-
kansas. 
(2) 
Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction, 
Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee. 
SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212(e) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 
Stat. 2599) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraphs 
(23) and (27); 
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (28) and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana; 
‘‘(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana; 
‘‘(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana; 
‘‘(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and 
‘‘(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.’’. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 
212(i)(1) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by
243
striking ‘‘section—’’ and all that follows before the period 
at the end and inserting ‘‘section $20,000,000’’. 
SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED 
PROJECTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 219(e) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 
3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 
(7); 
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (8) and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in sub-
section (c)(18); 
‘‘(10) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(20); 
‘‘(11) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(23); 
‘‘(12) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(25); 
‘‘(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(26); 
‘‘(14) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(27);
244
‘‘(15) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(28); and 
‘‘(16) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(40).’’. 
(b) EAST ARKANSAS ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY, AR-
KANSAS.—Federal assistance made available under the 
rural enterprise zone program of the Department of Agri-
culture may be used toward payment of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project described in section 
219(c)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A–219) if such assistance is authorized to 
be used for such purposes. 
SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CON-
STRUCTION FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. 
The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports 
and, if the Secretary determines the project is feasible, shall 
expedite completion of construction for the following 
projects: 
(1) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, 
being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s). 
(2) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, 
being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
245
(3) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, 
being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s). 
(4) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, 
New York, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330). 
(5) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney 
Point, New York, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2309a). 
(6) Newton Creek, Bainbridge, New York, being 
carried out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r). 
(7) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New 
York, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330). 
SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CER-
TAIN PROJECTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall expedite com-
pletion of the reports for the following projects and, if the 
Secretary determines that a project is justified in the com-
pleted report, proceed directly to project preconstruction, 
engineering, and design:
246
(1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, 
Arkansas. 
(2) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont 
Key, Florida. 
(3) Project for ecosystem restoration, University 
Lake, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 
(4) Project for hurricane and storm damage re-
duction, Montauk Point, New York. 
(b) SPECIAL RULE FOR EGMONT KEY, FLORIDA.—In 
carrying out the project for shoreline stabilization at 
Egmont Key, Florida, referred to in subsection (a)(2), the 
Secretary shall waive any cost share to be provided by non-
Federal interests for any portion of the project that benefits 
federally owned property. 
(c) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
MONTAUK
POINT, NEW 
YORK.—The Secretary shall complete the report for the 
project referred to in subsection (a)(4) not later than Sep-
tember 30, 2005, notwithstanding the ownership of the 
property to be protected. 
SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESS-
MENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct, at 
Federal expense, an assessment of the water resources needs 
of the river basins and watersheds of the southeastern 
United States.