datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(E) the aboriginal, indigenous people of
the United States have—
‘‘(i) a continuing right to autonomy in
their internal affairs; and
‘‘(ii) an ongoing right of self-deter-
mination and self-governance that has
never been extinguished.
‘‘(13) The political relationship between the
United States and the Native Hawaiian people has
been recognized and reaffirmed by the United
States, as evidenced by the inclusion of Native Ha-
waiians in—
‘‘(A) the Native American Programs Act of
1974 (42 U.S.C. 2991 et seq.);
‘‘(B) the American Indian Religious Free-
dom Act (42 U.S.C. 1996);
‘‘(C) the National Museum of the Amer-
ican Indian Act (20 U.S.C. 80q et seq.);
‘‘(D) the Native American Graves Protec-
tion and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et
seq.);
‘‘(E) the National Historic Preservation
Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.);
‘‘(F) the Native American Languages Act
(25 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.);
‘‘(G) the American Indian, Alaska Native,
and Native Hawaiian Culture and Art Develop-
ment Act (20 U.S.C. 4401 et seq.);
‘‘(H) the Workforce Investment Act of
1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.); and
‘‘(I) the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42
U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).
‘‘(14) In 1981, Congress instructed the Office
of Education to submit to Congress a comprehensive
report on Native Hawaiian education. The report,
entitled the ‘Native Hawaiian Educational Assess-
ment Project’, was released in 1983 and documented
that Native Hawaiians scored below parity with re-
gard to national norms on standardized achievement
tests, were disproportionately represented in many
negative social and physical statistics indicative of
special educational needs, and had educational needs
that were related to their unique cultural situation,
such as different learning styles and low self-image.
‘‘(15) In recognition of the educational needs of
Native Hawaiians, in 1988, Congress enacted title
IV of the Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford
Elementary and Secondary School Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (102 Stat. 130) to authorize
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1248
To prohibit the possession of a firearm in a hospital zone.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit the possession of a firearm in a hospital zone.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE POSSESSION OF A FIRE-
ARM IN A HOSPITAL ZONE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (y)
the following:
‘‘(z)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess
a firearm that has been shipped or transported in inter-
state or foreign commerce, in a place that the person
knows or has reasonable cause to believe is in a hospital
zone.
‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession
of a firearm—
‘‘(A) on private property that is not on the
grounds of any hospital;
‘‘(B) on public property outside any building or
enclosed structure, if the individual possessing the
firearm is licensed to do so by the State or political
subdivision in which the hospital zone is located, and
the law of the State or political subdivision requires
that, before an individual obtains such a license, the
law enforcement authorities of the State or political
subdivision verify that the individual is qualified
under law to receive the license;
‘‘(C) by an individual in accordance with a con-
tract entered into between the owner of a hospital in
the hospital zone and the individual or an employer
of the individual; or
‘‘(D) by a law enforcement officer acting in his
or her official capacity.
(b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 921(a) of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(35) The term ‘hospital zone’ means—
‘‘(A) in or on the grounds of a public or private
hospital; or
‘‘(B) within 1,000 feet from the grounds of a
public or private hospital.
‘‘(36) The term ‘hospital’ means an institution
which—
‘‘(A) is primarily engaged in providing, by or
under the supervision of physicians, to inpatients—
‘‘(i) diagnostic services and therapeutic
services for medical diagnosis, treatment and
care of injured, disabled or sick persons; or
‘‘(ii) rehabilitation services for the rehabili-
tation of injured, disabled or sick persons; or
‘‘(B) in the case of an institution in a State in
which State or applicable local law provides for the
licensing of hospitals—
‘‘(i) is licensed pursuant to such law; or
‘‘(ii) is approved, by the agency of the
State or locality responsible for licensing hos-
pitals, as meeting the standards established for
such licensing.’’.
(c) PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(7) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(z) shall
be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both. Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, a term of imprisonment imposed under this para-
graph shall not run concurrently with any other term of
imprisonment imposed under any other provision of law.’’.
Æ
succeeding fiscal year. The Secretary shall determine such
costs utilizing information obtained from the College
Board or information provided annually by the College
Board in its annual survey of institutions of higher edu-
cation.
‘‘(2) In determining the costs of tuition and expenses
under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall take into account
the following:
‘‘(A) Tuition and fees.
‘‘(B) The cost of books and supplies.
‘‘(C) The cost of board.
‘‘(D) Transportation costs.
‘‘(E) Other nonfixed educational expenses.
‘‘(3) A determination made under paragraph (1) in
a year shall take effect on October 1 of that year and
apply with respect to basic educational assistance allow-
ances payable under this section for the fiscal year begin-
ning in that year.
‘‘(4) Not later than September 30 each year, the Sec-
retary shall publish in the Federal Register the average
monthly costs of tuition and expenses as determined under
paragraph (1) in that year.
‘‘(5) For purposes of this section, the term ‘institu-
tion of higher education’ has the meaning given that term
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1249
To ensure that crop losses resulting from plant viruses and other plant
diseases are covered by crop insurance and the noninsured crop assist-
ance program and that agricultural producers who suffer such losses
are eligible for emergency loans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To ensure that crop losses resulting from plant viruses and
other plant diseases are covered by crop insurance and
the noninsured crop assistance program and that agricul-
tural producers who suffer such losses are eligible for
emergency loans.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COVERAGE FOR CROP LOSSES FROM PLANT
DISEASE UNDER CROP INSURANCE AND NON-
INSURED CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.
(a) CROP INSURANCE PROGRAM.—Section 508 of the
Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508) is amended
in subsections (a)(1) and (b)(1) by inserting ‘‘plant dis-
ease,’’ after ‘‘flood,’’.
(b) NONINSURED CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.—
Section 196(a)(3) of the Federal Agriculture Improvement
and Reform Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7333(a)(3)) is amend-
ed by inserting ‘‘plant disease,’’ after ‘‘flood,’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO MAKE EMERGENCY DISASTER
LOANS FOR FARMING OPERATIONS SUBSTAN-
TIALLY AFFECTED BY A PLANT DISEASE.
Section 321(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1961(a)) is amended by in-
serting ‘‘or plant disease’’ after ‘‘natural disaster’’ each
place such term appears.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 124
To provide for the full funding of Federal Pell Grants.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mr. KELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To provide for the full funding of Federal Pell Grants.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Full Fund-
ing Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FULLY FUNDING FED-
ERAL PELL GRANTS.
(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 401 of the Higher Edu-
cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(k) AVAILABILITY
OF FUNDS.—Each fiscal year
there shall be available to the Secretary, from funds not
otherwise appropriated, such amounts as may be nec-
essary to pay to each student the amount for which such
student is eligible under this section.’’.
(b) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
401(b)(3)(A) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘for
which an appropriation Act provides a maximum basic
grant in an amount in excess of $2,700’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1251
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of
1992 to increase the Federal share of the costs of the San Gabriel
Basin demonstration project.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mrs. 
NAPOLITANO
(for 
herself, 
Mr. 
CALVERT, 
Mr. 
DREIER, 
Ms.
ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Mr. HORN) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Ad-
justment Act of 1992 to increase the Federal share of
the costs of the San Gabriel Basin demonstration project.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN FEDERAL SHARE OF SAN GA-
BRIEL BASIN DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.
Section 1631(d)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Au-
thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h–
13) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘In the case’’ and inserting ‘‘(A)
Subject to subparagraph (B), in the case’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) In the case of the San Gabriel Basin demonstra-
tion project authorized by section 1614, the Federal share
of the cost of such project may not exceed the sum deter-
mined by adding—
‘‘(i) the amount that applies to that project
under subparagraph (A); and
‘‘(ii) $12,500,000.’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1253
To amend the Shipping Act of 1984 to restore the application of the antitrust
laws to certain agreements and conduct to which such Act applies.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. HYDE, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Ju-
diciary, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdic-
tion of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Shipping Act of 1984 to restore the applica-
tion of the antitrust laws to certain agreements and
conduct to which such Act applies.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Market Antitrust
Immunity Reform (FAIR) Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.
Section 7(a) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C.
App. 1706(a)) is amended—
to reduce the number of tick-borne Lyme dis-
ease vectors in areas where humans work or
recreate.
(f) FOURTH GOAL: PREVENTION OF TICK-BORNE
DISEASES OTHER THAN LYME.—For purposes of sub-
section (a), the goal described in this subsection is to de-
velop the capabilities at the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, within the Department of Defense, and
in State and local health departments to implement ade-
quate surveillance, improved diagnosis, and effective strat-
egies for the prevention and control of tick-borne diseases
other than Lyme disease. Such diseases may include
Lyme-like illness, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, other bacterial,
viral and rickettsial diseases such as tularemia, tick-borne
encephalitis, and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, respec-
tively.
(g) FIFTH GOAL: IMPROVED PUBLIC AND PHYSICIAN
EDUCATION.—For purposes of subsection (a), the goal de-
scribed in this subsection is to improve the knowledge of
physicians, health care providers, and the public regarding
the best and most effective methods to prevent, diagnose,
and treat Lyme disease and related tick-borne diseases.
SEC. 4. LYME DISEASE TASKFORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the
date of enactment of this Act, there shall be established
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘entered into only among
marine terminal operators with respect to an
activity described in section 4(b)’’ after ‘‘agree-
ment’’,
(B) by striking ‘‘section 5(d) or’’, and
(C) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end,
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(A) by striking ‘‘or agreement’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘, assessment agreement, or agreement of
the kind described in paragraph (1) that is’’,
and
(B) by striking the semicolon at the end
and inserting a period, and
(3) by striking paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and
(6).
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.
(a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub-
section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this
Act shall take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment
of this Act.
(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend-
ments made by this Act shall not apply with respect to
conduct occurring before the effective date of this Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1257
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make the budget process
more transparent.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms.
HARMAN, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. BOYD, Mr.
JOHN, Mr. TURNER, Mr. HILL, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. PETERSON of Min-
nesota, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. TANNER, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs.
TAUSCHER, Mr. HONDA, Mr. EVANS, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, and
Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget,
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make
the budget process more transparent.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Budg-
eting Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the
following new section:
‘‘TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT
‘‘SEC. 316. It shall not be in order in the House of
Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint
resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report
thereon, reducing revenues in which all changes in law
made by such measure are not completed by the fifth cal-
endar year beginning after the date of enactment of such
measure.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con-
tents set forth in section 2(a) of the Congressional Budget
and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by in-
serting after the item relating to section 315 the following
new item:
‘‘Sec. 316. Transparency requirement.’’.
Æ
V
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1258
For the relief of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron,
Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 27, 2001
Mr. COX introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
For the relief of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders,
Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY
STUDY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury
shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise
appropriated, $lllllll to the persons named in
subsection (b) for damages sustained by such persons in
connection with the air installation compatible use zone
study conducted by the Secretary of the Army with respect
to Los Alamitos Army Airfield under part 256 of title 32,
Code of Federal Regulations.
(b) PERSONS TO RECEIVE COMPENSATION.—The
Secretary of the Treasury shall compensate the following
persons under subsection (a):
(1) Sarabeth M. Davis of Clinton, Washington.
(2) Robert S. Borders of Newport Beach, Cali-
fornia.
(3) Victor Maron of Long Beach, California.
(4) Irving Berke of Long Beach, California.
(5) Adele E. Conrad of Cypress, California.
SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES.
Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settle-
ment of all legal and equitable claims by the persons
named in section 1(b) against the United States for the
damages described in section 1(a).
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.
Not more than 10 percent of the payment made
under section 1 may be paid to or received by an agent
or attorney as consideration for any service rendered in
connection with this Act. Each violation of this section
shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more
than $1,000.
Æ
HR 1259 IH1S
tablishment of encryption and electronic authentication
standards required for use in computer systems other than
Federal Government computer systems.’’.
SEC. 7. MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS.
Section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3), as amended by this
Act, is further amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(8), as so redesignated by
section 3(1) of this Act, by inserting ‘‘to the extent
that such coordination will improve computer secu-
rity and to the extent necessary for improving such
security for Federal computer systems’’ after ‘‘Man-
agement and Budget)’’;
(2) in subsection (e), as so redesignated by sec-
tion 4(1) of this Act, by striking ‘‘shall draw upon’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘may draw upon’’;
(3) in subsection (e)(2), as so redesignated by
section 4(1) of this Act, by striking ‘‘(b)(5)’’ and in-
serting in lieu thereof ‘‘(b)(7)’’; and
(4) in subsection (f)(1)(B)(i), as so redesig-
nated by section 4(1) of this Act, by inserting ‘‘and
computer networks’’ after ‘‘computers’’.
SEC. 8. FEDERAL COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY TRAINING.
Section 5(b) of the Computer Security Act of 1987
(40 U.S.C. 759 note) is amended—
HR 1259 IH1S
(3) MAINTENANCE
OF
LIST.—The Director
shall maintain and make available to Federal agen-
cies a list of electronic certification and management
technologies evaluated as conforming to the speci-
fications established under paragraph (1).
(d) REPORTS.—Not later than 18 months after the
date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter,
the Director shall transmit to the Congress a report that
includes—
(1) a description and analysis of the utilization
by Federal agencies of electronic authentication
technologies; and
(2) a description and analysis regarding the
problems Federal agencies are having, and the
progress such agencies are making, in implementing
electronic authentication infrastructures.
(e) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—
(1) the term ‘‘electronic authentication’’ means
cryptographic or noncryptographic methods of au-
thenticating identity in an electronic communication;
(2) the term ‘‘electronic authentication infra-
structure’’ means the software, hardware, and per-
sonnel resources, and the procedures, required to ef-
fectively 
utilize 
electronic 
authentication 
tech-
nologies;
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 125
To amend title 10, United States Code, to temporarily expand the Department
of Defense program by which State and local law enforcement agencies
may procure certain law enforcement equipment through the Department.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mr. LUTHER (for himself and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services
A BILL
To amend title 10, United States Code, to temporarily ex-
pand the Department of Defense program by which State
and local law enforcement agencies may procure certain
law enforcement equipment through the Department.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Equip Local Po-
lice Act’’.
SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT BY STATE AND LOCAL LAW EN-
FORCEMENT AGENCIES OF LAW ENFORCE-
MENT EQUIPMENT THROUGH DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE.
Section 381 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (e); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing new subsection:
‘‘(d) TEMPORARY PROCUREMENT OF OTHER LAW
ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT.—(1) The Secretary of De-
fense shall expand the procedures established under sub-
section (a) for the purchase of law enforcement equipment
suitable for counter-drug activities to include law enforce-
ment equipment that is not suitable or intended for
counter-drug activities. The catalog maintained under sub-
section (c) shall be expanded to include law enforcement
equipment authorized for procurement under this sub-
section.
‘‘(2) Law enforcement equipment authorized for pro-
curement under this subsection by State and local govern-
ments may not include any equipment that the Depart-
ment of Defense does not procure for its own purposes.
‘‘(3) The expanded procurement authority provided
under this subsection shall expire at the end of the two-
year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this
subsection, except that the Secretary may continue to
process after the expiration date any request received
under this subsection before that date.’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1260
To prohibit the cloning of humans, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH, 28, 2001
Mr. KERNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit the cloning of humans, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban on Human
Cloning Act’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING CLONING OF HUMANS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for a person
to engage in a human cloning procedure with the intent
of implanting the resulting cellular product into a uterus.
(b) CLONING PROCEDURE.—A person shall be con-
sidered to have engaged in a human cloning procedure for
purposes of subsection (a) if the person transfers the nu-
cleus of a human somatic cell into an egg cell from which
the nucleus has been removed.
(c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Any person who violates
subsection (a) shall be fined in accordance with title 18,
United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 5 years,
or both.
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act takes effect upon
the expiration the 30-day period beginning on the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1261
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of
1992 to impose a limit on the Federal share of the costs of the Long
Beach Desalinization Research and Development Project in Los Angeles
County, California.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 28, 2001
Mr. HORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Resources
A BILL
To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Ad-
justment Act of 1992 to impose a limit on the Federal
share of the costs of the Long Beach Desalinization
Research and Development Project in Los Angeles Coun-
ty, California.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIMIT ON FEDERAL COST OF THE LONG BEACH
DESALINIZATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOP-
MENT PROJECT.
Section 1605(b)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Au-
thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h–
3(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘50 percent of the total’’
and inserting ‘‘the lesser of 50 percent of the total or
$13,500,000’’.
Æ