IB
Union Calendar No. 453
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3559
[Report No. 103–808]
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and
for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOVEMBER 19, 1993
Mr. HALL of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Natural Resources
OCTOBER 3, 1994
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House
on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act
of 1992, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 201(b) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage
Preservation Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–419, approved
October 16, 1992), is amended as follows:
(1) In paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(2) In paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(3) In paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(4) In paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(5) In paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
TITLE I—DAYTON AVIATION
HERITAGE AMENDMENTS
SEC. 101. DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE AMENDMENTS.
Section 201(b) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Pres-
ervation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww–21(b)), is amended
as follows:
(1) In paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(2) In paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(3) In paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(4) In paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
(5) In paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘from rec-
ommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consideration of
recommendations’’.
TITLE II—MANASSAS NATIONAL
BATTLEFIELD PARK AMEND-
MENTS
SEC 201. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ‘‘Manassas National
Battlefield Park Amendments of 1994’’.
SEC. 202. ORDERLY RESOLUTION.
Subsection (b)(2)(C) of the first section of the Act enti-
tled ‘‘An Act to preserve within Manassas National Battle-
field Park, Virginia, the most important historic properties
relating to the battles of Manassas, and for other purposes’’,
approved April 17, 1954 (16 U.S.C. 429b(b)(2)(C)), is
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence:
‘‘If, pursuant to this paragraph, the United States takes
property that is used for public utility purposes (including
taking a property right by terminating an easement), the
owner of the property or the grantee of the easement may,
not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of
the Manassas National Battlefield Park Amendments of
1994, initiate a proceeding in a court of competent jurisdic-
tion seeking a determination of just compensation with re-
spect to the taking of the property.’’.
Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend the
Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 and
to provide for orderly resolution of claims with respect to
property used for public utility purposes at the Manasses
National Battlefield Park.’’.