HR 5122 PCS 
(c) REPORT.—A report described in this subsection 
is a report prepared by the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency and submitted to the congressional defense com-
mittees containing the following: 
(1) A description of the essential components of 
a proposed space-based interceptor system, including 
a description of how the system proposed would en-
hance or complement other missile defense systems. 
(2) An estimate of the acquisition and life-cycle 
cost of the system described under paragraph (1), 
including lift cost and periodic replacement cost due 
to depreciation and attrition. 
(3) An analysis of the vulnerability of such a 
system to counter-measures, including direct ascent 
and co-orbital interceptors, and an analysis of the 
functionality of such a system in the aftermath of a 
nuclear detonation in space. 
(4) A projection of the foreign policy and na-
tional security implications of a space-based inter-
ceptor program, including the probable response of 
United States adversaries and United States allies. 
SEC. 223. HIGH ALTITUDE AIR SHIP PROGRAM. 
Within the amount provided in section 201 for Re-
search, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
(1) $5,000,000 is available for the High Alti-
tude Air Ship Program; and 
(2) the amount provided for the Space Based 
Space 
Surveillance 
System 
is 
reduced 
by 
$5,000,000. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 231. REVIEW OF TEST AND EVALUATION POLICIES 
AND PRACTICES TO ADDRESS EMERGING AC-
QUISITION APPROACHES. 
(a) REVISION TO REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Section 
2399(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘tested are effective and suitable for combat’’ 
and inserting the following: ‘‘tested— 
‘‘(i) are effective and suitable for combat 
in accordance with the users’ standards for ef-
fectiveness and suitability as reflected in the re-
quirements process; or 
‘‘(ii) are operationally acceptable under 
certain restricted conditions, as delineated by 
the Director.’’. 
(b) REVIEW OF TEST AND EVALUATION POLICIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of De-
fense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in 
coordination with the Director of Operational Test 
and Evaluation and the Director of the Defense Test 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
Resource Management Center, shall conduct a re-
view of test and evaluation policies and practices of 
the Department of Defense and issue such new or 
revised guidance as may be necessary to address 
emerging acquisition approaches. 
(2) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—The issues to 
be addressed by the Under Secretary in the review 
under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, 
appropriate polices and practices for— 
(A) ensuring the adequacy and the expedi-
ency of test and evaluation activities with re-
gard to— 
(i) items that are acquired pursuant 
to the rapid acquisition authority in section 
806 of the Bob Stump National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 
(10 U.S.C. 2302 note); 
(ii) programs that are conducted pur-
suant to the spiral development authority 
in section 803 of the Bob Stump National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003 (10 U.S.C. 2430 note) (or other au-
thority for the conduct of incremental ac-
quisition programs) ; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
(iii) systems that are acquired pursu-
ant to other emerging acquisition ap-
proaches, as approved by the Under Sec-
retary; and 
(iv) materiel that is not subject to the 
operational test and evaluation require-
ments in sections 2366 and 2399 of title 
10, United States Code, but which may re-
quire limited operational test and evalua-
tion for the purposes of ensuring the safety 
and realistic survivability of the materiel 
and the personnel using the materiel; and 
(B) the appropriate use, if any, of oper-
ational test and evaluation resources to assess 
technology readiness levels for purposes of sec-
tion 2366a of title 10, United States Code, and 
other applicable technology readiness require-
ments. 
(c) INCLUSION OF TESTING NEEDS IN STRATEGIC 
PLAN.—The Director of the Defense Test Resource Man-
agement Center shall ensure that the strategic plan for 
Department of Defense test and evaluation resources re-
quired by section 196 of title 10, United States Code— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
(1) reflects any testing needs of the Depart-
ment of Defense that are identified in the review 
under paragraph (1); and 
(2) includes an assessment of the test and eval-
uation facilities, resources, and budgets that will be 
required to meet such needs. 
(d) REPORT.—Not later than nine months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
on the review conducted, and any new or revised guidance 
issued, pursuant to subsection (b). 
TITLE III—OPERATION AND 
MAINTENANCE 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 
Sec. 302. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 303. Other Department of Defense Programs. 
Subtitle B—Environmental Provisions 
Sec. 311. Revision of requirement for unexploded ordnance program manager. 
Sec. 312. Identification and monitoring of military munitions disposal sites in 
ocean waters extending from United States coast to outer 
boundary of outer Continental Shelf. 
Sec. 313. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs 
in connection with Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site, Moses 
Lake, Washington. 
Sec. 314. Funding of cooperative agreements under environmental restoration 
program. 
Sec. 315. Analysis and report regarding contamination and remediation respon-
sibility for Norwalk Defense Fuel Supply Point, Norwalk, Cali-
fornia. 
Sec. 316. Report regarding scope of perchlorate contamination at formerly used 
defense sites. 
Subtitle C—Workplace and Depot Issues 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS