H. R. 2082—20 
first included in a report under this section to the end of 
the calendar quarter immediately proceeding the submittal of 
the report under this section. 
‘‘(2) The current development schedule for the system, 
including an estimate of annual development costs until 
development is completed. 
‘‘(3) The planned procurement schedule for the system, 
including the best estimate of the Director of National Intel-
ligence of the annual costs and units to be procured until 
procurement is completed. 
‘‘(4) A full life-cycle cost analysis for such system. 
‘‘(5) The result of any significant test and evaluation of 
such major system as of the date of the submittal of such 
report, or, if a significant test and evaluation has not been 
conducted, a statement of the reasons therefor and the results 
of any other test and evaluation that has been conducted of 
such system. 
‘‘(6) The reasons for any change in acquisition cost, or 
schedule, for such system from the previous report under this 
section, if applicable. 
‘‘(7) The major contracts or subcontracts related to the 
major system. 
‘‘(8) If there is any cost or schedule variance under a 
contract referred to in paragraph (7) since the previous report 
under this section, the reasons for such cost or schedule vari-
ance. 
‘‘(c) DETERMINATION OF INCREASE IN COSTS.—Any determina-
tion of a percentage increase in the acquisition costs of a major 
system for which a report is filed under this section shall be 
stated in terms of constant dollars from the first fiscal year in 
which funds are appropriated for such contract. 
‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘acquisition cost’, with respect to a major 
system, means the amount equal to the total cost for develop-
ment and procurement of, and system-specific construction for, 
such system. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘full life-cycle cost’, with respect to the 
acquisition of a major system, means all costs of development, 
procurement, construction, deployment, and operation and sup-
port for such program, without regard to funding source or 
management control, including costs of development and 
procurement required to support or utilize such system. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘major contract,’ with respect to a major 
system acquisition, means each of the 6 largest prime, associate, 
or government-furnished equipment contracts under the pro-
gram that is in excess of $40,000,000 and that is not a firm, 
fixed price contract. 
‘‘(4) The term ‘major system’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 506A(e). 
‘‘(5) The term ‘significant test and evaluation’ means the 
functional or environmental testing of a major system or of 
the subsystems that combine to create a major system.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in the first 
section of that Act, as amended by sections 306, 311, and 312 
of this Act, is further amended by inserting after the item relating
H. R. 2082—21 
to section 506D, as added by section 312(a)(2), the following new 
item: 
‘‘Sec. 506E. Reports on the acquisition of major systems.’’. 
SEC. 314. EXCESSIVE COST GROWTH OF MAJOR SYSTEMS. 
(a) NOTIFICATION.—Title V of the National Security Act of 1947, 
as amended by sections 306, 311, 312, and 313 of this Act, is 
further amended by inserting after section 506E, as added by section 
313(a), the following new section: 
‘‘EXCESSIVE COST GROWTH OF MAJOR SYSTEMS 
‘‘SEC. 506F. (a) COST INCREASES OF AT LEAST 25 PERCENT.— 
(1)(A) On a continuing basis, and separate from the submission 
of any report on a major system required by section 506E of this 
Act, the program manager shall determine if the acquisition cost 
of such major system has increased by at least 25 percent as 
compared to the baseline cost of such major system. 
‘‘(B) Not later than 10 days after the date that a program 
manager determines that an increase described in subparagraph 
(A) has occurred, the program manager shall submit to the Director 
of National Intelligence notification of such increase. 
‘‘(2)(A) If, after receiving a notification described in paragraph 
(1)(B), the Director of National Intelligence determines that the 
acquisition cost of a major system has increased by at least 25 
percent, the Director shall submit to the congressional intelligence 
committees a written notification of such determination as described 
in subparagraph (B), a description of the amount of the increase 
in the acquisition cost of such major system, and a certification 
as described in subparagraph (C). 
‘‘(B) The notification required by subparagraph (A) shall 
include— 
‘‘(i) an updated cost estimate; 
‘‘(ii) the date on which the determination covered by such 
notification was made; 
‘‘(iii) contract performance assessment information with 
respect to each significant contract or sub-contract related to 
such major system, including the name of the contractor, the 
phase of the contract at the time of the report, the percentage 
of work under the contract that has been completed, any change 
in contract cost, the percentage by which the contract is cur-
rently ahead or behind schedule, and a summary explanation 
of significant occurrences, such as cost and schedule variances, 
and the effect of such occurrences on future costs and schedules; 
‘‘(iv) the prior estimate of the full life-cycle cost for such 
major system, expressed in constant dollars and in current 
year dollars; 
‘‘(v) the current estimated full life-cycle cost of such major 
system, expressed in constant dollars and current year dollars; 
‘‘(vi) a statement of the reasons for any increases in the 
full life-cycle cost of such major system; 
‘‘(vii) the current change and the total change, in dollars 
and expressed as a percentage, in the full life-cycle cost 
applicable to such major system, stated both in constant dollars 
and current year dollars; 
‘‘(viii) the completion status of such major system expressed 
as the percentage—
H. R. 2082—22 
‘‘(I) of the total number of years for which funds have 
been appropriated for such major system compared to the 
number of years for which it is planned that such funds 
will be appropriated; and 
‘‘(II) of the amount of funds that have been appro-
priated for such major system compared to the total amount 
of such funds which it is planned will be appropriated; 
‘‘(ix) the action taken and proposed to be taken to control 
future cost growth of such major system; and 
‘‘(x) any changes made in the performance or schedule 
of such major system and the extent to which such changes 
have contributed to the increase in full life-cycle costs of such 
major system. 
‘‘(C) The certification described in this subparagraph is a writ-
ten certification made by the Director and submitted to the congres-
sional intelligence committees that— 
‘‘(i) the acquisition of such major system is essential to 
the national security; 
‘‘(ii) there are no alternatives to such major system that 
will provide equal or greater intelligence capability at equal 
or lesser cost to completion; 
‘‘(iii) the new estimates of the full life-cycle cost for such 
major system are reasonable; and 
‘‘(iv) the management structure for the acquisition of such 
major system is adequate to manage and control full life-cycle 
cost of such major system. 
‘‘(b) COST INCREASES
OF
AT LEAST 50 PERCENT.—(1)(A) On 
a continuing basis, and separate from the submission of any report 
on a major system required by section 506E of this Act, the program 
manager shall determine if the acquisition cost of such major system 
has increased by at least 50 percent as compared to the baseline 
cost of such major system. 
‘‘(B) Not later than 10 days after the date that a program 
manager determines that an increase described in subparagraph 
(A) has occurred, the program manager shall submit to the Director 
of National Intelligence notification of such increase. 
‘‘(2) If, after receiving a notification described in paragraph 
(1)(B), the Director of National Intelligence determines that the 
acquisition cost of a major system has increased by at least 50 
percent as compared to the baseline cost of such major system, 
the Director shall submit to the congressional intelligence commit-
tees a written certification stating that— 
‘‘(A) the acquisition of such major system is essential to 
the national security; 
‘‘(B) there are no alternatives to such major system that 
will provide equal or greater intelligence capability at equal 
or lesser cost to completion; 
‘‘(C) the new estimates of the full life-cycle cost for such 
major system are reasonable; and 
‘‘(D) the management structure for the acquisition of such 
major system is adequate to manage and control the full life- 
cycle cost of such major system. 
‘‘(3) In addition to the certification required by paragraph (2), 
the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congres-
sional intelligence committees an updated notification, with current 
accompanying information, as required by subsection (a)(2).
H. R. 2082—23 
‘‘(c) PROHIBITION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—(1) If a written 
certification required under subsection (a)(2)(A) is not submitted 
to the congressional intelligence committees within 60 days of the 
determination made under subsection (a)(1), funds appropriated 
for the acquisition of a major system may not be obligated for 
a major contract under the program. Such prohibition on the obliga-
tion of funds shall cease to apply at the end of the 30-day period 
of a continuous session of Congress that begins on the date on 
which Congress receives the notification required under subsection 
(a)(2)(A). 
‘‘(2) If a written certification required under subsection (b)(2) 
is not submitted to the congressional intelligence committees within 
60 days of the determination made under subsection (b)(2), funds 
appropriated for the acquisition of a major system may not be 
obligated for a major contract under the program. Such prohibition 
on the obligation of funds for the acquisition of a major system 
shall cease to apply at the end of the 30-day period of a continuous 
session of Congress that begins on the date on which Congress 
receives the notification required under subsection (b)(3). 
‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘acquisition cost’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 506E(d). 
‘‘(2) The term ‘baseline cost’, with respect to a major system, 
means the projected acquisition cost of such system that is 
approved by the Director of National Intelligence at Milestone 
B or an equivalent acquisition decision for the development, 
procurement, and construction of such system. The baseline 
cost may be in the form of an independent cost estimate. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘full life-cycle cost’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 506E(d). 
‘‘(4) The term ‘independent cost estimate’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 506A(e). 
‘‘(5) The term ‘major system’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 506A(e). 
‘‘(6) The term ‘Milestone B’ means a decision to enter 
into system development and demonstration pursuant to guid-
ance prescribed by the Director of National Intelligence. 
‘‘(7) The term ‘program manager’, with respect to a major 
system, means— 
‘‘(A) the head of the element of the intelligence commu-
nity which is responsible for the budget, cost, schedule, 
and performance of the major system; or 
‘‘(B) in the case of a major system within the Office 
of the Director of National Intelligence, the deputy who 
is responsible for the budget, cost, schedule, and perform-
ance of the major system.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in the first 
section of that Act, as amended by sections 304, 311, 312, and 
313 of this Act, is further amended by inserting after the items 
relating to section 506E, as added by section 313(b), the following 
new item: 
‘‘Sec. 506F. Excessive cost growth of major systems.’’.
H. R. 2082—24 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
SEC. 321. RESTRICTION ON CONDUCT OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 
The authorization of appropriations by this Act shall not be 
deemed to constitute authority for the conduct of any intelligence 
activity which is not otherwise authorized by the Constitution or 
the laws of the United States. 
SEC. 322. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF INTELLIGENCE COMMU-
NITY UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947. 
Subparagraph (L) of section 3(4) of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘other’’ the 
second place it appears. 
SEC. 323. MODIFICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DIFFERENT 
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 
Subparagraph (B) of section 504(a)(3) of the National Security 
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 414(a)(3)) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(B) the use of such funds for such activity supports an 
emergent need, improves program effectiveness, or increases 
efficiency; and’’. 
SEC. 324. PROTECTION OF CERTAIN NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMA-
TION. 
(a) INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR DISCLOSURE OF UNDERCOVER 
INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS AND AGENTS.— 
(1) DISCLOSURE OF AGENT AFTER ACCESS TO INFORMATION 
IDENTIFYING
AGENT.—Subsection (a) of section 601 of the 
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 421) is amended 
by striking ‘‘ten years’’ and inserting ‘‘15 years’’. 
(2) DISCLOSURE
OF
AGENT
AFTER
ACCESS
TO
CLASSIFIED 
INFORMATION.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by 
striking ‘‘five years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’. 
(b) MODIFICATIONS
TO ANNUAL REPORT
ON PROTECTION
OF 
INTELLIGENCE IDENTITIES.—The first sentence of section 603(a) of 
the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 423(a)) is amended 
by inserting ‘‘including an assessment of the need for any modifica-
tion of this title for the purpose of improving legal protections 
for covert agents,’’ after ‘‘measures to protect the identities of covert 
agents,’’. 
SEC. 325. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO DELETE INFORMATION 
ABOUT RECEIPT AND DISPOSITION OF FOREIGN GIFTS 
AND DECORATIONS. 
Paragraph (4) of section 7342(f) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(4)(A) In transmitting such listings for an element of the 
intelligence community, the head of such element may delete the 
information described in subparagraph (A) or (C) of paragraph 
(2) or in subparagraph (A) or (C) of paragraph (3) if the head 
of such element certifies in writing to the Secretary of State that 
the publication of such information could adversely affect United 
States intelligence sources or methods. 
‘‘(B) Any information not provided to the Secretary of State 
pursuant to the authority in subparagraph (A) shall be transmitted 
to the Director of National Intelligence who shall keep a record 
of such information.
H. R. 2082—25 
‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘element of the intelligence 
community’ means an element of the intelligence community listed 
in or designated under section 3(4) of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)).’’. 
SEC. 326. REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE DETAINEE TREATMENT 
ACT OF 2005 AND RELATED PROVISIONS OF THE MILITARY 
COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 45 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence 
shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a com-
prehensive report on all measures taken by the Office of the Director 
of National Intelligence and by each element, if any, of the intel-
ligence community with relevant responsibilities to comply with 
the provisions of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title X 
of division A of Public Law 109–148; 119 Stat. 2739) and related 
provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (Public Law 
109–366; 120 Stat. 2600). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the detention or interrogation methods, 
if any, that have been determined to comply with section 1003 
of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (119 Stat. 2739; 42 
U.S.C. 2000dd) and section 6 of the Military Commissions Act 
of 2006 (120 Stat. 2632; 18 U.S.C. 2441 note) (including the 
amendments made by such section 6), and, with respect to 
each such method— 
(A) an identification of the official making such deter-
mination; and 
(B) a statement of the basis for such determination. 
(2) A description of the detention or interrogation methods, 
if any, whose use has been discontinued pursuant to the 
Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 or the Military Commission 
Act of 2006, and, with respect to each such method— 
(A) an identification of the official making the deter-
mination to discontinue such method; and 
(B) a statement of the basis for such determination. 
(3) A description of any actions that have been taken to 
implement section 1004 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 
(119 Stat. 2740; 42 U.S.C. 2000dd–1), and, with respect to 
each such action— 
(A) an identification of the official taking such action; 
and 
(B) a statement of the basis for such action. 
(4) Any other matters that the Director considers necessary 
to fully and currently inform the congressional intelligence 
committees about the implementation of the Detainee Treat-
ment Act of 2005 and related provisions of the Military Commis-
sions Act of 2006. 
(5) An appendix containing— 
(A) all guidelines for the application of the Detainee 
Treatment Act of 2005 and related provisions of the Mili-
tary Commissions Act of 2006 to the detention or interroga-
tion activities, if any, of any element of the intelligence 
community; and 
(B) the legal justifications of any office of the Depart-
ment of Justice about the meaning or application of the
H. R. 2082—26 
Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 or related provisions of 
the Military Commissions Act of 2006 with respect to the 
detention or interrogation activities, if any, of any element 
of the intelligence community. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be sub-
mitted in classified form. 
(d) SUBMISSION
TO
THE
CONGRESSIONAL
ARMED
SERVICES 
COMMITTEES.—To the extent that the report required by subsection 
(a) addresses an element of the intelligence community within the 
Department of Defense, that portion of the report, and any associ-
ated material that is necessary to make that portion understand-
able, shall also be submitted by the Director of National Intelligence 
to the congressional armed services committees. 
(e) CONGRESSIONAL ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE DEFINED.— 
In this section, the term ‘‘congressional armed services committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives. 
SEC. 327. LIMITATION ON INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES. 
(a) LIMITATION.—No individual in the custody or under the 
effective control of an element of the intelligence community or 
instrumentality thereof, regardless of nationality or physical loca-
tion, shall be subject to any treatment or technique of interrogation 
not authorized by the United States Army Field Manual on Human 
Intelligence Collector Operations. 
(b) INSTRUMENTALITY
DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘instrumentality’’, with respect to an element of the intelligence 
community, means a contractor or subcontractor at any tier of 
the element of the intelligence community. 
SEC. 328. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS. 
Not more than 30 percent of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated for the Expenditure Center referred to on page 157 of 
Volume VI, Book 1 of the Fiscal Year 2008 - Fiscal Year 2009 
Congressional Budget Justification, National Intelligence Program, 
may be obligated or expended until each member of the congres-
sional intelligence committees has been fully and currently informed 
with respect to intelligence regarding a facility in Syria subject 
to reported military action by the State of Israel on September 
6, 2007, including intelligence relating to any agent or citizen 
of North Korea, Iran, or any other foreign country present at 
the facility, and any intelligence provided to the Federal Govern-
ment by a foreign country regarding the facility (as available). 
SEC. 329. INCORPORATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 
Each requirement to submit a report to the congressional intel-
ligence committees that is included in the classified annex to this 
Act is hereby incorporated into this Act and is hereby made a 
requirement in law. 
SEC. 330. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) ANNUAL REPORT ON INTELLIGENCE.— 
(1) REPEAL.—Section 109 of the National Security Act of 
1947 (50 U.S.C. 404d) is repealed.
H. R. 2082—27 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in the 
first section of the National Security Act of 1947 is amended 
by striking the item relating to section 109. 
(b) ANNUAL AND SPECIAL REPORTS ON INTELLIGENCE SHARING 
WITH THE UNITED NATIONS.—Section 112 of the National Security 
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404g) is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (b); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as sub-
sections (b), (c), and (d), respectively. 
(c) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INITIA-
TIVES.—Section 1102(b) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
U.S.C. 442a(b)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (2). 
(d) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION UNDER TERRORIST IDENTIFICA-
TION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.—Section 343 of the Intelligence 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (50 U.S.C. 404n–2) is 
amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (d); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h) as 
subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively. 
(e) ANNUAL REPORT
ON COUNTERDRUG INTELLIGENCE MAT-
TERS.—Section 826 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2003 (Public Law 107–306; 116 Stat. 2429; 21 U.S.C. 873 
note) is repealed. 
(f) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 507(a) of the National 
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 415b(a)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B); and 
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (N) 
as subparagraphs (A) through (L), respectively; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (D). 
TITLE IV—MATTERS RELATING TO ELE-
MENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COM-
MUNITY 
Subtitle A—Office of the Director of 
National Intelligence 
SEC. 401. CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON COLOCATION OF THE 
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE. 
Section 103(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
403–3(e)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘WITH’’ and inserting ‘‘OF HEADQUARTERS 
WITH HEADQUARTERS OF’’; 
(2) by inserting ‘‘the headquarters of’’ before ‘‘the Office’’; 
and 
(3) by striking ‘‘any other element’’ and inserting ‘‘the head-
quarters of any other element’’.
H. R. 2082—28 
SEC. 402. MEMBERSHIP OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTEL-
LIGENCE ON THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY OVER-
SIGHT BOARD. 
Subparagraph (F) of section 115(b)(1) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(F) The Director of National Intelligence, or the Direc-
tor’s designee.’’. 
SEC. 403. ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF THE DIRECTOR OF SCIENCE AND 
TECHNOLOGY. 
Section 103E of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
403–3e) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (7); 
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
and 
(C) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following: 
‘‘(5) assist the Director in establishing goals for basic, 
applied, and advanced research to meet the technology needs 
of the intelligence community and to be executed by elements 
of the intelligence community by— 
‘‘(A) 
systematically 
identifying, 
assessing, 
and 
prioritizing the most significant intelligence challenges that 
require technical solutions; and 
‘‘(B) examining options to enhance the responsiveness 
of research programs; 
‘‘(6) submit to Congress an annual report on the science 
and technology strategy of the Director; and’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3) of subsection (d)— 
(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 
subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; 
(B) in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, by 
inserting ‘‘and prioritize’’ after ‘‘coordinate’’; and 
(C) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so redesig-
nated, the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(A) identify basic, advanced, and applied research pro-
grams to be executed by elements of the intelligence 
community;’’. 
SEC. 404. LEADERSHIP AND LOCATION OF CERTAIN OFFICES AND 
OFFICIALS. 
(a) NATIONAL
COUNTER
PROLIFERATION
CENTER.—Section 
119A(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404o– 
1(a)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 18 
months after the date of the enactment of the National Security 
Intelligence Reform Act of 2004, the’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(2) DIRECTOR.—The head of the National Counter Pro-
liferation Center shall be the Director of the National Counter 
Proliferation Center, who shall be appointed by the Director 
of National Intelligence.
H. R. 2082—29 
‘‘(3) LOCATION.—The National Counter Proliferation Center 
shall be located within the Office of the Director of National 
Intelligence.’’. 
(b) OFFICERS.—Section 103(c) of that Act (50 U.S.C. 403–3(c)) 
is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (13); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following new para-
graphs: 
‘‘(9) The Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence 
Community. 
‘‘(10) The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. 
‘‘(11) The Director of the National Counterterrorism Center. 
‘‘(12) The Director of the National Counter Proliferation 
Center.’’. 
SEC. 405. PLAN TO IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DATA 
CENTER ENERGY EFFICIENCY REPORTS. 
(a) PLAN.—The Director of National Intelligence shall develop 
a plan to implement the recommendations of the report submitted 
to Congress under section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to study 
and promote the use of energy efficient computer servers in the 
United States’’ (Public Law 109–431; 120 Stat. 2920) across the 
intelligence community. 
(b) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later then February 1, 2008, the 
Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congres-
sional intelligence committees a report containing the plan 
developed under subsection (a). 
(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 
SEC. 406. COMPREHENSIVE LISTING OF SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS. 
Not later than February 1, 2008, the Director of National 
Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence commit-
tees a classified comprehensive listing of all special access programs 
under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 
3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(6))). 
Such listing may be submitted in a form or forms consistent with 
the protection of national security. 
SEC. 407. REPORTS ON THE NUCLEAR PROGRAMS OF IRAN AND NORTH 
KOREA. 
(a) REQUIREMENT FOR REPORTS.—Not less frequently than once 
during fiscal year 2008 and twice during fiscal year 2009, the 
Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional 
intelligence committees a report on the intentions and capabilities 
of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People’s Republic 
of Korea, with regard to the nuclear programs of each such country. 
(b) CONTENT.—Each report submitted by subsection (a) shall 
include, with respect of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Demo-
cratic People’s Republic of Korea— 
(1) an assessment of nuclear weapons programs of each 
such country; 
(2) an evaluation, consistent with existing reporting stand-
ards and practices, of the sources upon which the intelligence 
used to prepare the assessment described in paragraph (1) 
is based, including the number of such sources and an assess-
ment of the reliability of each such source;
H. R. 2082—30 
(3) a summary of any intelligence related to any such 
program gathered or developed since the previous report was 
submitted under subsection (a), including intelligence collected 
from both open and clandestine sources for each such country; 
and 
(4) a discussion of any dissents, caveats, gaps in knowledge, 
or other information that would reduce confidence in the assess-
ment described in paragraph (1). 
(c) NATIONAL
INTELLIGENCE
ESTIMATE.—The Director of 
National Intelligence may submit a National Intelligence Estimate 
on the intentions and capabilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran 
and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in lieu of a report 
required by subsection (a). 
(d) FORM.—Each report submitted under subsection (a) may 
be submitted in classified form. 
SEC. 408. REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS BY THE 
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE. 
(a) RESPONSIBILITY
OF
THE DIRECTOR
OF NATIONAL INTEL-
LIGENCE.—Subsection (b) of section 102 of the National Security 
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (3)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘2004,’’ and inserting ‘‘2004 (50 U.S.C. 
403 note),’’; and 
(B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (3), the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(4) conduct accountability reviews of elements of the intel-
ligence community and the personnel of such elements, if appro-
priate.’’. 
(b) TASKING AND OTHER AUTHORITIES.—Subsection (f) of section 
102A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 403–1) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8), as paragraphs 
(8) and (9), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (6), the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(7)(A) The Director of National Intelligence shall, if the 
Director determines it is necessary, or may, if requested by a 
congressional intelligence committee, conduct accountability reviews 
of elements of the intelligence community or the personnel of such 
elements in relation to significant failures or deficiencies within 
the intelligence community. 
‘‘(B) The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with 
the Attorney General, shall establish guidelines and procedures 
for conducting accountability reviews under subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) The requirements of this paragraph shall not limit any 
authority of the Director of National Intelligence under subsection 
(m) or with respect to supervision of the Central Intelligence 
Agency.’’. 
SEC. 409. MODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON DELEGATION BY THE 
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE OF THE PROTEC-
TION OF INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS. 
Section 102A(i)(3) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
U.S.C. 403–1(i)(3)) is amended by inserting before the period the
H. R. 2082—31 
following: ‘‘or the Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence 
Community’’. 
SEC. 410. AUTHORITIES FOR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION SHARING. 
(a) 
AUTHORITIES
FOR
INTERAGENCY
FUNDING.—Section 
102A(g)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403– 
1(g)(1)) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and inserting 
a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: 
‘‘(G) in carrying out this subsection, without regard to 
any other provision of law (other than this Act and the National 
Security Intelligence Reform Act of 2004 (title I of Public Law 
108–458; 118 Stat. 3643)), expend funds and make funds avail-
able to other departments or agencies of the United States 
for, and direct the development and fielding of, systems of 
common concern related to the collection, processing, analysis, 
exploitation, and dissemination of intelligence information; and 
‘‘(H) for purposes of addressing critical gaps in intelligence 
information sharing or access capabilities, have the authority 
to transfer funds appropriated for a program within the 
National Intelligence Program to a program funded by appro-
priations not within the National Intelligence Program, con-
sistent with paragraphs (3) through (7) of subsection (d).’’. 
(b) AUTHORITIES OF HEADS OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND AGEN-
CIES.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of 
any department or agency of the United States is authorized to 
receive and utilize funds made available to the department or 
agency by the Director of National Intelligence pursuant to section 
102A(g)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403– 
1(g)(1)), as amended by subsection (a), and receive and utilize 
any system referred to in such section that is made available 
to the department or agency. 
(c) REPORTS.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT FOR REPORTS.—Not later than February 
1 of each of the fiscal years 2009 through 2012, the Director 
of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intel-
ligence committees a report detailing the distribution of funds 
and systems during the preceding fiscal year pursuant to 
subparagraph (G) or (H) of section 102A(g)(1) of the National 
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403–1(g)(1)), as added by sub-
section (a). 
(2) CONTENT.—Each such report shall include— 
(A) a listing of the agencies or departments to which 
such funds or systems were distributed; 
(B) a description of the purpose for which such funds 
or systems were distributed; and 
(C) a description of the expenditure of such funds, 
and the development, fielding, and use of such systems 
by the receiving agency or department. 
SEC. 411. AUTHORITIES OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTEL-
LIGENCE FOR INTERAGENCY FUNDING. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102A of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403–1), as amended by sections 303 and 304 
of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
H. R. 2082—32 
‘‘(u) AUTHORITIES
FOR INTERAGENCY FUNDING.—(1) Notwith-
standing section 1346 of title 31, United States Code, or any other 
provision of law prohibiting the interagency financing of activities 
described in subparagraph (A) or (B), upon the request of the 
Director of National Intelligence, any element of the intelligence 
community may use appropriated funds to support or participate 
in the interagency activities of the following: 
‘‘(A) National intelligence centers established by the 
Director under section 119B. 
‘‘(B) Boards, commissions, councils, committees, and similar 
groups that are established— 
‘‘(i) for a term of not more than 2 years; and 
‘‘(ii) by the Director. 
‘‘(2) No provision of law enacted after the date of the enactment 
of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 shall 
be construed to limit or supersede the authority in paragraph 
(1) unless such provision makes specific reference to the authority 
in that paragraph.’’. 
(b) REPORTS.—Not later than February 1 of each of the fiscal 
years 2009 through 2012, the Director of National Intelligence 
shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report 
detailing the exercise of any authority pursuant to subsection (u) 
of section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
403–1), as amended by subsection (a), during the preceding fiscal 
year. 
SEC. 412. TITLE OF CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE INTEL-
LIGENCE COMMUNITY. 
Section 103G of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
403–3g) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘of the Intelligence 
Community’’ after ‘‘Chief Information Officer’’; 
(2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘of the Intelligence 
Community’’ after ‘‘Chief Information Officer’’; 
(3) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘of the Intelligence 
Community’’ after ‘‘Chief Information Officer’’; and 
(4) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘of the Intelligence 
Community’’ after ‘‘Chief Information Officer’’ the first place 
it appears. 
SEC. 413. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the National Security Act of 
1947 (50 U.S.C. 402 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
section 103G the following new section: 
‘‘INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY 
‘‘SEC. 103H. (a) OFFICE
OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
OF INTEL-
LIGENCE COMMUNITY.—There is within the Office of the Director 
of National Intelligence an Office of the Inspector General of the 
Intelligence Community. 
‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Office of the Inspector Gen-
eral of the Intelligence Community is to— 
‘‘(1) create an objective and effective office, appropriately 
accountable to Congress, to initiate and conduct independently 
investigations, inspections, and audits on matters within the
H. R. 2082—33 
responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intel-
ligence; 
‘‘(2) recommend policies designed— 
‘‘(A) to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness 
in the administration and implementation of matters 
within the responsibility and authority of the Director of 
National Intelligence; and 
‘‘(B) to prevent and detect fraud and abuse in such 
matters; 
‘‘(3) provide a means for keeping the Director of National 
Intelligence fully and currently informed about— 
‘‘(A) problems and deficiencies relating to matters 
within the responsibility and authority of the Director of 
National Intelligence; and 
‘‘(B) the necessity for, and the progress of, corrective 
actions; and 
‘‘(4) in the manner prescribed by this section, ensure that 
the congressional intelligence committees are kept similarly 
informed of— 
‘‘(A) significant problems and deficiencies relating to 
matters within the responsibility and authority of the 
Director of National Intelligence; and 
‘‘(B) the necessity for, and the progress of, corrective 
actions. 
‘‘(c) INSPECTOR GENERAL
OF INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.—(1) 
There is an Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, who 
shall be the head of the Office of the Inspector General of the 
Intelligence Community, who shall be appointed by the President, 
by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
‘‘(2) The nomination of an individual for appointment as 
Inspector General shall be made— 
‘‘(A) without regard to political affiliation; 
‘‘(B) solely on the basis of integrity, compliance with the 
security standards of the intelligence community, and prior 
experience in the field of intelligence or national security; and 
‘‘(C) on the basis of demonstrated ability in accounting, 
financial analysis, law, management analysis, public adminis-
tration, or auditing. 
‘‘(3) The Inspector General shall report directly to and be under 
the general supervision of the Director of National Intelligence. 
‘‘(4) The Inspector General may be removed from office only 
by the President. The President shall immediately communicate 
in writing to the congressional intelligence committees the reasons 
for the removal of any individual from the position of Inspector 
General. 
‘‘(d) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subject to subsections (g) 
and (h), it shall be the duty and responsibility of the Inspector 
General of the Intelligence Community— 
‘‘(1) to provide policy direction for, and to plan, conduct, 
supervise, and coordinate independently, the investigations, 
inspections, and audits relating to matters within the responsi-
bility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence 
to ensure they are conducted efficiently and in accordance 
with applicable law and regulations; 
‘‘(2) to keep the Director of National Intelligence fully and 
currently informed concerning violations of law and regulations, 
violations of civil liberties and privacy, fraud and other serious