150 
SEC. 3073. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN. 
The Secretary shall expedite development of the 
dredged material management plan for the project for 
navigation St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
299). 
SEC. 3074. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The text of section 1149 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4254) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘The Secretary shall construct at Federal expense a 
second lock, of the same dimensions as the existing Poe 
Lock, adjacent to the existing lock at Sault Sainte Marie, 
Michigan, generally in accordance with the report of the 
Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, dated May 
19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated Feb-
ruary 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.’’. 
(b) 
CONFORMING
REPEALS.—The 
following 
provisoins are repealed: 
(1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620). 
(2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717–3718). 
(3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305).
151 
SEC. 3075. ADA, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood damage re-
duction, Wild Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried 
out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in de-
termining the Federal interest in the project. 
(b) EVALUATION
OF BENEFITS
AND COSTS.—In 
evaluating the economic benefits and costs for the project, 
the Secretary shall not consider the emergency levee adja-
cent to Judicial Ditch No. 51 in the determination of con-
ditions existing prior to construction of the project. 
(c) SPECIAL RULE.—In evaluating and implementing 
the project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal in-
terest to participate in the financing of the project in ac-
cordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary’s evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project. 
SEC. 3076. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Du-
luth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
(33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide
152 
public access and recreational facilities as generally de-
scribed in the Detailed Project Report and Environmental 
Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, 
Minnesota, dated August 1999. 
(b) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall provide credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
the costs of design work carried out before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project. 
(c) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $5,000,000. 
SEC. 3077. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non- 
Federal share of the cost of the navigation project for 
Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, carried out under sec-
tion 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577) and modified by section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), for the costs 
of design work carried out before the date of the partner-
ship agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the project. 
SEC. 3078. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is directed to im-
plement under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of
153 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the locally preferred plan for flood 
damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, substantially 
in accordance with the detailed project report dated 2002, 
at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$4,000,000. 
(b) PROJECT FINANCING.—In evaluating and imple-
menting the project under this section, the Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interests to participate in the fi-
nancing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report 
evaluation indicates that applying such section is nec-
essary to implement the project. 
(c) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the project the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before date of execution of a partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project. 
(d) MAXIMUM FUNDING.—The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the flood damage 
reduction shall be $8,000,000.