datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(ii) does not include laboratories or other
providers of technical services to the motion pic-
ture, video, or television industry;
‘‘(D) the term ‘editing’ means the purposeful or
accidental removal of existing material or insertion
of new material;
‘‘(E) the term ‘exhibitor’ means any local
broadcast station, cable system, airline, motion pic-
ture theater, or other person that publicly performs
a motion picture by means of any technology;
‘‘(F) the term ‘exploit’ means to exhibit publicly
or offer to the public through sale or lease, and the
term ‘exploitation’ means the act of exploiting;
‘‘(G) the term ‘film’ or ‘motion picture’
means—
‘‘(i) a theatrical motion picture, after its
publication, of 60 minutes duration or greater,
intended for exhibition, public performance,
public sale or lease, and
‘‘(ii) does not include episodic television
programs of less than 60 minutes duration (ex-
clusive of commercials), motion pictures pre-
pared for private commercial or industrial pur-
poses, or advertisements;
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1728
To revive the suspension of duty on 1,5-naphthalene diisocyanate.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mr. COYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To revive the suspension of duty on 1,5-naphthalene
diisocyanate.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF
DUTY.
Heading 9902.30.07 (relating to 1,5-naphthalene
diisocyanate) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States is amended by striking out ‘‘12/31/92’’ and
inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by sub-
section (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO TERMINATION OF
PREVIOUS SUSPENSION.—Notwithstanding section 514 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro-
vision of law, upon proper request filed with the appro-
priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date
of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal
from warehouse for consumption, of any good described
in heading 9902.30.07 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States that was made—
(1) after December 31, 1992; and
(2) before the 15th day after the date of the en-
actment of this Act;
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry
or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1729
To permit refund of customs duties on certain drawback entries upon
presentation of certificates of delivery.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mrs. FOWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To permit refund of customs duties on certain drawback
entries upon presentation of certificates of delivery.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CERTAIN DRAWBACK ENTRIES.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec-
retary of the Treasury shall—
(1) reliquidate with allowance of drawback
those entries identified in Protest No. 5201–9–
000417, which was filed with the United States Cus-
toms Service, Miami, Florida District, on October
20, 1989, and
(2) refund the full amount of the duties paid
upon the imported merchandise covered by such en-
tries, less 1 percent of such duties,
if the appropriate certificates of delivery relating to such
entries are submitted to the appropriate customs officer
by no later than the date that is 180 days after the date
of enactment of this Act.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1949 
To ensure efficient performance of agency functions. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 23, 2011 
Mr. SARBANES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 
A BILL 
To ensure efficient performance of agency functions. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 
‘‘Correction of Long-Standing Errors in Agencies’ 
Unsustainable Procurements Act of 2011’’ or the 
‘‘CLEAN–UP Act’’. 
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for 
this Act is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 
Sec. 2. Definitions. 
Sec. 3. Findings. 
Sec. 4. Purposes. 
Sec. 5. General personnel policy. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:38 May 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H1949.IH
H1949
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Sec. 6. Consideration of in-house performance required for new work. 
Sec. 7. Transition to Federal employee performance of certain functions. 
Sec. 8. Establishment of inventories and reviews of contracts for services. 
Sec. 9. Identifying and addressing shortages of Federal employees. 
Sec. 10. Expedited hiring authority for performance of certain functions by 
Federal employees. 
Sec. 11. Establishment of business process reengineering projects as a pre-
ferred alternative to the OMB Circular A–76 process. 
Sec. 12. Reforms to the OMB Circular A–76 process. 
Sec. 13. Establishment of temporary suspension on use of OMB Circular A–76 
process until reforms required in this Act have been substan-
tially implemented. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) 
INHERENTLY
GOVERNMENTAL
FUNC-
TIONS.—The term ‘‘inherently governmental func-
tions’’ has the meaning given the term under section 
5 of the Federal Activities Inventory Act of 1998 
(31 U.S.C. 1501 note) and subpart 7.5 of part 7 of 
the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 
(2) FUNCTIONS CLOSELY ASSOCIATED WITH IN-
HERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS.—The term 
‘‘functions closely associated with inherently govern-
mental functions’’ means the functions described in 
section 7.503(d) of the Federal Acquisition Regula-
tion that are recurring. 
(3) 
MISSION-ESSENTIAL
FUNCTIONS.—The 
term ‘‘mission-essential functions’’ refers to func-
tions that, although neither necessarily inherently 
governmental nor necessarily closely related to an in-
herently governmental function, are nevertheless 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:38 May 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1949.IH
H1949
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
V 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 194 
For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 5, 2011 
Mr. PASTOR of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARTHA 
PALMILLAS DE MORALES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, Martha Palmillas de Morales shall be eligible for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi-
dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi-
grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 
of status to lawful permanent resident. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:27 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H194.IH
H194
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
HR 1738 IH
not preclude the PromoFlor Council from
offering its plans and projects for use by
commercial parties, under terms and con-
ditions prescribed by the PromoFlor Coun-
cil and approved by the Secretary; and
(iii) that no such plan or project may
make use of unfair or deceptive acts or
practices with respect to quality or value.
(B) RESEARCH.—The order shall provide
for the establishment, implementation, adminis-
tration, and evaluation of plans and projects for
market development research, research with re-
spect to the sale, distribution, marketing, or use
of cut flowers or cut greens, and other research
with respect to cut flowers or cut greens mar-
keting, promotion, or consumer information; for
the dissemination of the information gained by
such activities; and for the disbursement of nec-
essary funds for such purposes.
(C) SUBMISSION
TO
SECRETARY.—The
order shall provide that the PromoFlor Council
shall submit to the Secretary for approval any
proposed plan or project for cut flowers or cut
greens promotion, consumer information, or re-
370 
HR 1 PP
(63) Planned Parenthood of the North Country 
New York, Inc. in Watertown, New York. 
(64) Planned Parenthood of South Central New 
York, Inc. in Oneonta, New York. 
(65) Planned Parenthood of the Rochester/Syr-
acuse Region in Rochester, New York. 
(66) Planned Parenthood of the Southern Fin-
ger Lakes in Ithaca, New York. 
(67)
Planned
Parenthood
of
Western
New 
York, Inc. in Buffalo, New York. 
(68) Upper Hudson Planned Parenthood, Inc. 
in Albany, New York. 
(69) Planned Parenthood Health Systems, Inc. 
in Raleigh, North Carolina. 
(70) Planned Parenthood of Central North 
Carolina in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 
(71) Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio in 
Columbus, Ohio. 
(72) Planned Parenthood of Central Ohio, Inc. 
in Columbus, Ohio. 
(73) Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio in 
Akron, Ohio. 
(74) Planned Parenthood of Northwest Ohio in 
Toledo, Ohio. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:09 Dec 29, 2012
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00370
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\H1.PP
H1
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
291 
SEC. 1812. The amount provided by section 1101 for 
‘‘Department of Health and Human Services, National In-
stitutes of Health’’ is reduced by $260,000,000, through 
a pro rata reduction in all of the Institutes, Centers, and 
Office of the Director accounts within ‘‘Department of 
Health and Human Services, National Institutes of 
Health’’, based on the total of the projected funding levels 
for the Non-competing Research Project Grants in fiscal 
year 2011 for each such Institute, Center, and Office of 
the Director account. In addition, the Director of the Na-
tional Institutes of Health shall ensure that the average 
of the total cost of Competing Research Project Grants 
for all of the Institutes, Centers, and Office of the Director 
accounts within ‘‘Department of Health and Human Serv-
ices, National Institutes of Health’’ during fiscal year 
2011 shall not exceed $400,000. 
SEC. 1813. Notwithstanding section 1101, the level 
for ‘‘Department of Health and Human Services, National 
Institutes of Health, Buildings and Facilities’’ shall be 
$22,700,000. 
SEC. 1814. (a) Notwithstanding section 1101, the 
level for ‘‘Department of Health and Human Services, 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra-
tion, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services’’ shall 
be $3,202,152,000.
through either award of the loan or notification to the ap-
plicant that an assistance will not be made. No project
shall receive assistance under this section until the Sec-
retary has received the recommendations of the advisory
board. The Secretary has the authority to promulgate such
regulations as may be required to carry out the provisions
of this title.’’.
Æ
HR 1749 IH——2
resentatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the
Senate,’’.
Passed the House of Representatives March 29,
1993.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
371 
HR 1 PP
(75) Planned Parenthood of Southeast Ohio in 
Athens, Ohio. 
(76) Planned Parenthood of Central Oklahoma, 
Inc. in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 
(77) Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon 
in Eugene, Oregon. 
(78) Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Or-
egon in Eugene, Oregon. 
(79) Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette 
in Portland, Oregon. 
(80) Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advo-
cates in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 
(81) Planned Parenthood Association of Bucks 
County in Warminster, Pennsylvania. 
(82) Planned Parenthood of Central Pennsyl-
vania, Inc. in York, Pennsylvania. 
(83) Planned Parenthood of Northeast and 
Mid-Penn in Trexlertown, Pennsylvania. 
(84) Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsyl-
vania in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 
(85) Planned Parenthood Southeastern Penn-
sylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 
(86) Planned Parenthood of Middle and East 
Tennessee, Inc. in Nashville, Tennessee. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:09 Dec 29, 2012
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00371
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\H1.PP
H1
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
agement and Budget) to more fairly, effectively, ex-
peditiously, transparently, and apolitically oversee 
studies conducted under the Office of Management 
and Budget Circular A–76 or any other related ad-
ministrative regulation, directive, or policy, and en-
force the rules that govern those studies. 
(2) CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE OF REPORT.— 
This subsection does not require the Government 
Accountability Office to examine the rule-making au-
thority of the Office of Management and Budget 
with regard to OMB Circular A–76 or any other re-
lated administrative regulation, directive, or policy. 
(3) 
CONSULTATION
WITH
AGENCIES
AND 
STAKEHOLDERS.—In preparing the report under 
this subsection, the Comptroller General of the 
United States should consult with personnel of the 
Office of Management and Budget, staffing and 
manpower personnel of other executive agencies, per-
sonnel in the offices of other agencies’ inspectors 
general, and representatives from Federal employee 
unions and contractor associations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:38 May 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1949.IH
H1949
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 13. ESTABLISHMENT OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION ON 
USE OF OMB CIRCULAR A–76 PROCESS UNTIL 
REFORMS REQUIRED IN THIS ACT HAVE 
BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY IMPLEMENTED. 
No study or public-private competition regarding the 
conversion to contractor performance of any function per-
formed by Federal employees pursuant to Office of Man-
agement and Budget Circular A–76 or any other adminis-
trative regulation, directive, or policy, may be prepared 
for, announced, undertaken, continued, or finished until 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in 
consultation with the inspectors general of the 5 largest 
Federal departments in terms of annual budgets as of the 
date of the enactment of this Act, determines that— 
(1) at least three-fourths of all executive agen-
cies have made substantial progress in the imple-
mentation of all the reforms— 
(A) required in sections 6, 7, 8, and 9 of 
this Act; and 
(B) enacted pursuant to section 739 of the 
Financial Services and General Government Ap-
propriations Act, 2008 (division D of Public 
Law 110–161; 31 U.S.C. 501 note), under 
which each covered executive agency is required 
to devise and implement guidelines and proce-
dures to ensure that consideration is given to 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:38 May 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1949.IH
H1949
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
using, on a regular basis, Federal employees to 
perform new functions as well as functions that 
are currently performed by contractors; and 
(2) the Office of Management and Budget has 
implemented the reforms to the OMB Circular A–76 
described under section 12. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:38 May 28, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1949.IH
H1949
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1732
To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States,
under the program of aid to families with dependent children, to dis-
regard from the income of certain stepparents an amount equal to
the State’s standard of need for the stepparent’s new family.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act
to require States, under the program of aid to families
with dependent children, to disregard from the income
of certain stepparents an amount equal to the State’s
standard of need for the stepparent’s new family.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF STEPPARENT INCOME DIS-
REGARD.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(a)(31)(B) of the So-
cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 602(a)(31)(B)) is amended
by striking ‘‘those other individuals living in the same
household as the dependent child and claimed by such
stepparent as dependents for purposes of determining his
Federal income tax liability but’’ and inserting ‘‘(i) if the
stepparent is paying child support (pursuant to a court
order or an order of an administrative process established
under State law) and the family (excluding the stepparent)
would be eligible for such aid if the stepparent were not
a member of the family, those other individuals living in
the same household as the dependent child and claimed
by such stepparent as dependents for purposes of deter-
mining his Federal income tax liability, or (ii) if not, such
other individuals’’ after ‘‘the stepparent’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to payments under part A of
title IV of the Social Security Act for calendar quarters
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Martha Palmillas 
de Morales enters the United States before the filing dead-
line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 
have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 
eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF 
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Martha Palmillas de Morales, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur-
ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num-
ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 
of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 
the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail-
able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 
section 202(e) of such Act. 
(e) 
DENIAL
OF
PREFERENTIAL
IMMIGRATION 
TREATMENT
FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:27 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H194.IH
H194
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
parents, brothers, and sisters of Martha Palmillas de Mo-
rales shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:27 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H194.IH
H194
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1734
To prohibit the possession or transfer of non-sporting handguns.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit the possession or transfer of non-sporting
handguns.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST POSSESSION OR TRANS-
FER OF NON-SPORTING HANDGUNS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(s)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess
or transfer a non-sporting handgun.
‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the continuous
and otherwise lawful possession of a non-sporting handgun
by a person during any period that began before the effec-
tive date of this subsection.’’.
(b) NON-SPORTING HANDGUN DEFINED.—Section
921(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(29)(A) The term ‘non-sporting handgun’ means a
firearm which—
‘‘(i)(I) is designed to be fired by the use of a
single hand; and
‘‘(II) is not a sporting handgun; and
‘‘(ii) any combination of parts from which a
firearm described in clause (i) can be assembled.
‘‘(B) The term ‘sporting handgun’ means a firearm
which—
‘‘(i) is designed to be fired by the use of a sin-
gle hand; and
‘‘(ii) the Secretary has determined, using the
criteria applied in making determinations under sec-
tion 925(d)(3), to be of a type generally recognized
as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to
sporting purposes.’’.
(c) PENALTY.—Section 924(a)(1)(B) of such title is
amended by striking ‘‘or (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘(r), or (s)’’.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1735
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional penalties for
drive by shootings.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mr. GUTIERREZ (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional
penalties for drive by shootings.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drive By Shooting Act
of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing:
‘‘§ 36. Drive-by Shootings
‘‘Whoever, from within a motor vehicle that has been
transported, shipped, or received in interstate or foreign
commerce, discharges a firearm (as defined in section 921
of this title) and thereby causes a grave risk to the life
of another person shall—
‘‘(1) if death results, be fined under this title
or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both;
and
‘‘(2) be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than 30 years, in any other case.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘36. Drive-by Shootings.’’.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1736
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain deduc-
tions of members of the National Guard or reserve units of the Armed
Forces will be allowable in computing adjusted gross income.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 20, 1993
Mr. HUTTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that certain deductions of members of the National
Guard or reserve units of the Armed Forces will be
allowable in computing adjusted gross income.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain trade and busi-
ness deductions of employees) is amended by adding at
the end thereof the following new subparagraph:
‘‘(C) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF RESERVISTS
AND NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS.—The deduc-
tions allowed by part VI (section 161 and fol-
lowing) which consist of any of the following ex-
penses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in con-
nection with the performance by him of service
as a member of a reserve unit of the Armed
Forces of the United States or of a unit of the
National Guard:
‘‘(i) Expenses of travel, meals, and
lodging while away from home.
‘‘(ii) Expenses of transportation and
uniforms.’’
(b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.
Æ