datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4578 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic staple fiber. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 13, 2007 
Mr. BISHOP of Georgia (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. SHULER) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 
and Means 
A BILL 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic 
staple fiber. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 
new heading: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:38 Dec 16, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4578.IH
H4578
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2341
AN ACT 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 
the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and 
construction of a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater 
within and outside of the service area of the City of 
Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, WASTE-
WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT.—The Reclamation 
Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act 
(Public Law 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 1636. AUSTIN, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION AND 
REUSE PROJECT. 
‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera-
tion with the City of Austin Water and Wastewater Util-
ity, Texas, is authorized to participate in the planning (in-
cluding an appraisal and feasibility study), design, and 
construction of, and land acquisition for, a project to re-
claim and reuse wastewater, including degraded ground-
waters, within and outside of the service area of the City 
of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 
25 percent of the total cost of the project. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 
funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 
authorized by this section.
‘‘(d) SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of the 
Secretary to carry out any provisions of this section shall 
terminate 10 years after the date of the enactment of this 
section.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 (106 Stat. 4600) is 
amended by adding at the end of the items relating to 
chapter XVI the following:
‘‘Sec. 1636. Austin, Texas, water reclamation and reuse project.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2006. 
Attest:
Clerk.
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2341
AN ACT 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and 
Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to author-
ize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in 
the design, planning, and construction of a 
project to reclaim and reuse wastewater within 
and outside of the service area of the City of 
Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas.
356
SEC. 5145. BLUESTONE, WEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 547 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2676–2678) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(1)(A) by striking ‘‘4 
years’’ and inserting ‘‘5 years’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)(1)(B)(iii) by striking ‘‘if 
all’’ and all that follows through ‘‘facility’’ and in-
serting ‘‘assurance project’’; 
(3) in subsection (b)(1)(C) by striking ‘‘and 
construction’’ and inserting ‘‘, construction, and op-
eration and maintenance’’; 
(4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the 
following: 
‘‘(3) OPERATION AND OWNERSHIP.—The Tri-
Cities Power Authority shall be the owner and oper-
ator of the hydropower facilities referred to in sub-
section (a).’’; 
(5) in subsection (c)(1)—
(A) by striking ‘‘No’’ and inserting ‘‘Un-
less otherwise provided, no’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘planning,’’ before ‘‘de-
sign’’; and 
(C) by striking ‘‘prior to’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘subsection (d)’’; 
(6) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ‘‘design’’ 
and inserting ‘‘planning, design,’’;
357
(7) in subsection (d)—
(A) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) APPROVAL.—The Secretary shall review 
the design and construction activities for all features 
of the hydroelectric project that pertain to and affect 
stability of the dam and control the release of water 
from Bluestone Dam to ensure that the quality of 
construction of those features meets all standards 
established for similar facilities constructed by the 
Secretary.’’; 
(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 
paragraph (2); 
(C) by striking the period at the end of 
paragraph (2) (as so redesignated) and insert-
ing ‘‘, except that hydroelectric power is no 
longer a project purpose of the facility. Water 
flow releases from the hydropower facilities 
shall be determined and directed by the Corps 
of Engineers.’’; and 
(D) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(3) COORDINATION.—Construction of the hy-
droelectric generating facilities shall be coordinated 
with the dam safety assurance project currently in 
the design and construction phases.’’;
358
(8) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘in accord-
ance’’ and all that follows through ‘‘58 Stat. 890)’’; 
(9) in subsection (f)—
(A) by striking ‘‘facility of the inter-
connected systems of reservoirs operated by the 
Secretary’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘facilities under construction under such agree-
ments’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘design’’ and inserting 
‘‘planning, design’’; 
(10) in subsection (f)(2)—
(A) by ‘‘Secretary’’ each place it appears 
and inserting ‘‘Tri-Cities Power Authority’’; 
and 
(B) by striking ‘‘facilities referred to in 
subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘such facilities’’; 
(11) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (g) 
and inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) to arrange for the transmission of power 
to the market or to construct such transmission fa-
cilities as necessary to market the power produced at 
the facilities referred to in subsection (a) with funds 
contributed by the Tri-Cities Power Authority; and’’;
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2341 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 
Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of a project to reclaim and reuse 
wastewater within and outside of the service area of the City of Austin 
Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 12, 2005 
Mr. DOGGETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 
the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and 
construction of a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater 
within and outside of the service area of the City of 
Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, WASTE-
WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT.—The Reclamation 
Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act
(Public Law 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 1636. AUSTIN, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION AND 
REUSE PROJECT. 
‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera-
tion with the City of Austin Water and Wastewater Util-
ity, Texas, is authorized to participate in the planning (in-
cluding an appraisal and feasibility study), design, and 
construction of, and land acquisition for, a project to re-
claim and reuse wastewater, including degraded ground-
waters, within and outside of the service area of the City 
of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 
25 percent of the total cost of the project. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 
funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 
authorized by this section.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 (106 Stat. 4600) is 
amended by adding at the end of the items relating to 
chapter XVI the following: 
‘‘Sec. 1636. Austin, Texas, water reclamation and reuse project.’’. 
Æ
IIB 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2341 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
APRIL 26, 2006 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources 
AN ACT 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 
the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and 
construction of a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater 
within and outside of the service area of the City of 
Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:46 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2341.RFS
H2341
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
HR 2341 RFS 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, WASTE-
WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT.—The Reclamation 
Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act 
(Public Law 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 1636. AUSTIN, TEXAS, WATER RECLAMATION AND 
REUSE PROJECT. 
‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera-
tion with the City of Austin Water and Wastewater Util-
ity, Texas, is authorized to participate in the planning (in-
cluding an appraisal and feasibility study), design, and 
construction of, and land acquisition for, a project to re-
claim and reuse wastewater, including degraded ground-
waters, within and outside of the service area of the City 
of Austin Water and Wastewater Utility, Texas. 
‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 
25 percent of the total cost of the project. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 
funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 
authorized by this section. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:46 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2341.RFS
H2341
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
HR 2341 RFS 
‘‘(d) SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of the 
Secretary to carry out any provisions of this section shall 
terminate 10 years after the date of the enactment of this 
section.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 (106 Stat. 4600) is 
amended by adding at the end of the items relating to 
chapter XVI the following: 
‘‘Sec. 1636. Austin, Texas, water reclamation and reuse project.’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2006. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
06:46 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2341.RFS
H2341
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
363
SEC. 5151. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. 
Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b–13) is amended by adding 
at the end the following: 
‘‘(9) BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for 
flood control, Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an 
alternative to the project authorized by the first sec-
tion of the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938 
(52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the 
Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 
1414). 
‘‘(10) HALLS
BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for 
flood control, Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an al-
ternative to the project for flood control, Buffalo 
Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 
101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610). 
‘‘(11) ST. PAUL DOWNTOWN AIRPORT (HOLMAN 
FIELD), ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA.—The project for 
flood damage reduction, St. Paul Downtown Airport 
(Holman Field), St. Paul, Minnesota. 
‘‘(12) THORNTON RESERVOIR, COOK COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—The project for flood control, Chicago 
Underflow Plan, Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, 
Illinois.
364
‘‘(13) LAROSE
TO
GOLDEN
MEADOW, LOU-
ISIANA.—The project for flood control, Larose to 
Golden Meadow, Louisiana. 
‘‘(14) PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—The project for 
flood control, Perris, California.’’. 
SEC. 5152. USE OF FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGE FLEET. 
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study on 
the appropriate use of the Federal hopper dredge fleet. 
(b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study, the Sec-
retary shall—
(1) obtain and analyze baseline data to deter-
mine the appropriate use of the Federal hopper 
dredge fleet; 
(2) prepare a comprehensive analysis of the 
costs and benefits of existing and proposed restric-
tions on the use of the Federal hopper dredge fleet; 
and 
(3) assess the data and procedure used by the 
Secretary to prepare the Government cost estimate 
for worked performed by the Federal hopper dredge 
fleet. 
(c) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall conduct 
the study in consultation with ports, pilots, and represent-
atives of the private dredge industry.
365
(d) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress a report on the results of the study. 
SEC. 
5153. 
ADDITIONAL 
ASSISTANCE 
FOR 
CRITICAL 
PROJECTS. 
Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335–337; 114 
Stat. 2763A–220–221) is amended—
(1) by striking the undesignated paragraph re-
lating to Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(72) 
CHARLESTON, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.—
$20,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
wastewater collection systems, and stormwater sys-
tem improvements, Charleston, South Carolina.’’; 
(2) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relat-
ing to Placer and El Dorado Counties, California, as 
paragraph (73); 
(3) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relat-
ing to Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada 
Counties, California, as paragraph (74); 
(4) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
366
‘‘(75) INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.—$6,430,000 for 
environmental infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indi-
ana.’’; 
(5) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relat-
ing to St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76); 
and 
(6) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(77) 
ST. 
CLAIR
COUNTY, 
ALABAMA.—
$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, St. 
Clair County, Alabama. 
‘‘(78) 
CRAWFORD
COUNTY, 
ARKANSAS.—
$35,000,000 
for 
water 
supply 
infrastructure, 
Crawford County, Arkansas. 
‘‘(79) BRAWLEY COLONIA, IMPERIAL COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—$1,400,000 for water infrastructure 
to improve water quality in the Brawley Colonia 
Water District, Imperial County, California. 
‘‘(80) CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT, CALI-
FORNIA.—$23,000,000 for water and wastewater in-
frastructure for the Contra Costa Water District, 
California. 
‘‘(81) EAST BAY, SAN FRANCISCO, AND SANTA 
CLARA AREAS, CALIFORNIA.—$4,000,000 for a de-
salination project to serve the East Bay, San Fran-
cisco, and Santa Clara areas, California.
367
‘‘(82) 
IMPERIAL
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$10,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
a wastewater disinfection facility and polishing sys-
tem, to improve water quality in the vicinity of 
Calexico, California, on the southern New River, Im-
perial County, California. 
‘‘(83) RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA.—$25,000,000 
for a recycled water treatment facility, Richmond, 
California. 
‘‘(84) SANTA
CLARA
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—
$5,500,000 for an advanced recycling water treat-
ment plant in Santa Clara County, California. 
‘‘(85) SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—$15,000,000 for environmental infrastruc-
ture for the groundwater basin optimization pipeline, 
Southern Los Angeles County, California. 
‘‘(86) SWEETWATER
RESERVOIR, SAN
DIEGO 
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—$375,000 to improve water 
quality, and remove nonnative aquatic species from 
the Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, Cali-
fornia. 
‘‘(87) WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA.—$8,000,000 for 
water, wastewater, and water related infrastructure, 
Whittier, California.
368
‘‘(88) MONTEZUMA AND LA PLATA COUNTIES, 
COLORADO.—$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
related infrastructure for the Ute Mountain project, 
Montezuma and La Plata Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(89) PUEBLO AND OTERO COUNTIES, COLO-
RADO.—$34,000,000 for water transmission infra-
structure, Pueblo and Otero Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(90) 
LEDYARD
AND
MONTVILLE, 
CON-
NECTICUT.—$7,113,000 for water infrastructure, 
Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut. 
‘‘(91) ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUM-
BIA
AND
MARYLAND.—$20,000,000 for environ-
mental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development to enhance water quality and living re-
sources in the Anacostia River watershed, District of 
Columbia and Maryland. 
‘‘(92) WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.—
$35,000,000 for implementation of a combined 
sewer overflow long-term control plan, Washington, 
District of Columbia. 
‘‘(93) 
CHARLOTTE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$3,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, Char-
lotte County, Florida. 
‘‘(94) CHARLOTTE, LEE, AND COLLIER COUN-
TIES, 
FLORIDA.—$20,000,000 for water supply
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 
dependency and indemnity compensation to the survivors of former pris-
oners of war who died on or before September 30, 1999, under the 
same eligibility conditions as apply to payment of dependency and indem-
nity compensation to the survivors of former prisoners of war who die 
after that date. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 12, 2005 
Mr. HOLDEN (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. 
DAVIS of California, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. 
BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. OWENS, Mr. REYES, and Mrs. MCCARTHY) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Vet-
erans’ Affairs 
A BILL 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 
payment of dependency and indemnity compensation to 
the survivors of former prisoners of war who died on 
or before September 30, 1999, under the same eligibility 
conditions as apply to payment of dependency and in-
demnity compensation to the survivors of former pris-
oners of war who die after that date. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
That section 1318(b)(3) of title 38, United States Code,
is amended by striking ‘‘who died after September 30, 
1999,’’ 
Æ
369
interconnectivity infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and 
Collier Counties, Florida. 
‘‘(95) 
COLLIER
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$5,000,000 for water infrastructure to improve 
water quality in the vicinity of the Gordon River, 
Collier County, Florida. 
‘‘(96) JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA.—$25,000,000 
for wastewater related infrastructure, including sep-
tic tank replacements, Jacksonville, Florida. 
‘‘(97) NORTH VERNON AND BUTLERVILLE, IN-
DIANA.—$1,700,000 for wastewater infrastructure, 
North Vernon and Butlerville, Indiana. 
‘‘(98) SALEM, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, INDI-
ANA.—$3,200,000 for water supply infrastructure, 
Salem, Washington County, Indiana. 
‘‘(99) CENTRAL KENTUCKY.—$10,000,000 for 
water related infrastructure and resource protection 
and development, Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Ander-
son, Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln, 
Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Mont-
gomery, and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky. 
‘‘(100) PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.—$7,000,000 
for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure, 
Plaquemine, Louisiana.
370
‘‘(101) CITY OF BILOXI, CITY OF GULFPORT, 
AND HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—$15,000,000 
for water and wastewater related infrastructure, city 
of Biloxi, city of Gulfport, and Harrison County, 
Mississippi. 
‘‘(102) CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA.—$30,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, Clark County, Ne-
vada. 
‘‘(103) HENDERSON, NEVADA.—$5,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada. 
‘‘(104) PATERSON, NEW JERSEY.—$35,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, Paterson, New Jer-
sey. 
‘‘(105) SENNETT, NEW YORK.—$1,500,000 for 
water infrastructure, Town of Sennett, New York. 
‘‘(106) 
SPRINGPORT
AND
FLEMING, 
NEW 
YORK.—$10,000,000 for water related infrastruc-
ture, including water mains, pump stations, and 
water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, New 
York. 
‘‘(107) CABARRUS
COUNTY, 
NORTH
CARO-
LINA.—$4,500,000 for water related infrastructure, 
Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
371
‘‘(108) RICHMOND
COUNTY, 
NORTH
CARO-
LINA.—$8,000,000 for water related infrastructure, 
Richmond County, North Carolina. 
‘‘(109) UNION
COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA.—
$6,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Union 
County, North Carolina. 
‘‘(110) LAKE COUNTY, OHIO.—$1,500,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio. 
‘‘(111) 
MENTOR-ON-LAKE, 
OHIO.—$625,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-
Lake, Ohio. 
‘‘(112) WILLOWICK, OHIO.—$665,000 for water 
and wastewater infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio. 
‘‘(113) ALBANY, OREGON.—$35,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure to improve water quality, 
Albany, Oregon. 
‘‘(114) BOROUGH OF STOCKERTON, BOROUGH 
OF
TATAMY, AND
PALMER
TOWNSHIP, PENNSYL-
VANIA.—$10,000,000 for stormwater control meas-
ures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the vicinity 
of the Borough of Stockerton, the Borough of 
Tatamy, and Palmer Township, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(115) HATFIELD BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.—
$310,000 for wastewater related infrastructure for 
Hatfield Borough, Pennsylvania.
372
‘‘(116) LEHIGH
COUNTY, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—
$5,000,000 for stormwater control measures and 
storm sewer improvements, Lehigh County, Pennsyl-
vania. 
‘‘(117) NORTH
WALES
BOROUGH, PENNSYL-
VANIA.—$1,516,584 for wastewater related infra-
structure for North Wales Borough, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(118) 
PEN
ARGYL, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—
$5,250,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Pen 
Argyl, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(119) 
PHILADELPHIA, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—
$1,600,000 for wastewater related infrastructure for 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(120) 
VERA
CRUZ, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—
$5,500,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Vera 
Cruz, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(121) COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO.—
$35,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 
‘‘(122) CROSS, SOUTH CAROLINA.—$2,000,000 
for water related environmental infrastructure, 
Cross, South Carolina. 
‘‘(123) MYRTLE
BEACH, SOUTH
CAROLINA.—
$6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, includ-
ing ocean outfalls, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
III
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 44
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MARCH 24, 1999
Received
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 18th
annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),