†
HR 2419 EAS
Corps of Engineers and the City of Baltimore, Maryland,
dated April 2004.’’.
SEC. 107. MARMET LOCK, KANAWHA RIVER, WEST
VIRGINIA. Section 101(a)(31) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘$229,581,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$358,000,000’’.
SEC. 108. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIR-
GINIA. The project for flood control at Milton, West Vir-
ginia, authorized by section 580 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790), as modified by sec-
tion 340 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000
(114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Chief of Engi-
neers to construct the project substantially in accordance
with the draft report of the Corps of Engineers dated May
2004, at an estimated total cost of $45,500,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $34,125,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $11,375,000.
SEC. 109. WATER
REALLOCATION, LAKE
CUM-
BERLAND, KENTUCKY. (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to sub-
section (b), none of the funds made available by this Act
may be used to carry out any water reallocation project
or component under the Wolf Creek Project, Lake Cum-
berland, Kentucky, authorized under the Act of June 28,
1938 (52 Stat. 1215, chapter 795) and the Act of July 24,
1946 (60 Stat. 636, chapter 595).
†
HR 2419 EAS
(b) EXISTING REALLOCATIONS.—Subsection (a) shall
not apply to any water reallocation for Lake Cumberland,
Kentucky, that is carried out subject to an agreement or
payment schedule in effect on the date of enactment of this
Act.
SEC. 110. Section 529(b)(3) of Public Law 106–541
is amended by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$20,000,000’’ in lieu thereof.
SEC. 111. YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS,
MISSISSIPPI. The Yazoo Basin Headwater Improvement,
Mississippi, project authorized by the Flood Control Act of
1928 (45 Stat. 534), as amended and modified, is further
modified to include the design and construction at full Fed-
eral expense of such measures as determined by the Chief
of Engineers to be advisable for the control of bank erosion
along the Yazoo River and including, but not limited to,
the following tributaries and watersheds of the Yazoo River:
Tallahatchie River, Coldwater River (below Arkabutla
Dam), Bear Creek Diversion, Yalobusha River (below Gre-
nada Dam), Little Tallahatchie River (below Sardis Dam),
Yocona River (below Enid Dam), Tchula Lake, Cassidy
Bayou, Bobo Bayou Area, Arkabutla Canal, Ascalmore-
Tippo Creek, David-Burrell Bayou, McKinney Bayou, Lake
Cormorant Area, Hurricane Bayou, Opossum Bayou,
Chicopa Creek, Hillside Floodway, Bear Creek, Alligator-
†
HR 2419 EAS
Catfish Bayou, Rocky Bayou, Whiteoak Bayou, Potacocowa
Creek, Tillatoba Creek, Teoc Creek, Big Sand Creek,
Chicopa Creek, and miscellaneous ditches.
SEC. 112. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MUSEUM AND
RIVERFRONT INTERPRETIVE SITE, MISSISSIPPI. The Water
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4811) is
amended by—
(1) in section 103(c)(2) by striking ‘‘property
currently held by the Resolution Trust Corporation in
the vicinity of the Mississippi River Bridge’’ and in-
serting ‘‘riverfront property’’; and
(2) in section 103(c)(7)—
(A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting the
following: ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘$2,000,000’’ and all that
follows and inserting the following: ‘‘$15,000,000
to plan, design, and construct generally in ac-
cordance with the conceptual plan to be prepared
by the Corps of Engineers.
‘‘(B) FUNDING.—The planning, design, and
construction of the Lower Mississippi River Mu-
seum and Riverfront Interpretive Site shall be
carried out using funds appropriated as part of
the Mississippi River Levees feature of the Mis-
sissippi River and Tributaries Project, author-
†
HR 2419 EAS
ized by the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534,
chapter 569).’’.
SEC. 113. PUBLIC LAW 106–53. Section 593(h) (113
Stat. 381) is modified by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$50,000,000’’.
SEC. 114. The project for navigation, Los Angeles Har-
bor, California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577) is
modified to authorize the Chief of Engineers to carry out
the project at a total cost of $222,000,000.
SEC. 115. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIV-
ERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. (a) Section 514 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 is amended by inserting
after subsection (e):
‘‘(f) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding section
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–
5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this section, a non-
Federal interest may include a Regional or National non-
profit entity with the consent of the affected local govern-
ment.
‘‘(g) COST LIMITATION.—Not more than $5,000,000 in
Federal funds may be allotted under this section for a
project at any single locality.’’; and
(b) renumbering the succeeding subsections accord-
ingly.
†
HR 2419 EAS
SEC. 116. Section 514(f)(1) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–53) is amended
by adding at the end of the sentence before the period
‘‘which may be in cash, by the provision of lands, ease-
ments, rights-of-way, relocations or disposal areas, by in-
kind services to implement the project, or by any combina-
tion of the foregoing. Land needed for a project under this
authority may remain in private ownership subject to ease-
ments satisfactory to the Secretary necessary to assure
achievement of the project purposes’’.
SEC. 117. Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–53) is amended by
striking the words ‘‘for the period of fiscal years 2000 and
2001’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘per year, and such au-
thority shall extend until Federal fiscal year 2015’’.
SEC. 118. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNIT L–
15 LEVEE, MISSOURI. The portion of the L–15 levee system
which is under the jurisdiction of the Consolidated North
County Levee District and which is situated along the right
descending bank of the Mississippi River from its confluence
with the Missouri River and running upstream approxi-
mately 14 miles shall be considered to be a Federal levee
for purposes of cost sharing under 33 U.S.C. 701n.
SEC. 119. Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–580; 106 Stat. 4835),