107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 83
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
•HCON 83 EH
SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002.
The Congress declares that the concurrent resolution
on the budget for fiscal year 2001 is hereby revised and
replaced and that this is the concurrent resolution on the
budget for fiscal year 2002 and that the appropriate budg-
etary levels for fiscal years 2003 through 2011 are hereby
set forth.
SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.
The following budgetary levels are appropriate for
each of fiscal years 2001 through 2011:
(1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—For purposes of the
enforcement of this resolution:
(A) The recommended levels of Federal
revenues are as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $1,624,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,635,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,699,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,755,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,816,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,872,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,948,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $2,041,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $2,143,200,000,000.
iscal year 2010: $2,256,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $2,387,000,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
(B) The amounts by which the aggregate
levels of Federal revenues should be reduced are
as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $5,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $67,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $83,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $108,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $133,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $167,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $187,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $201,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $217,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010: $232,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $240,900,000,000.
(2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—For purposes
of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate
levels of total new budget authority are as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $1,556,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,613,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,660,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,723,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,799,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,851,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,918,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $1,998,500,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2009: $2,077,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010: $2,161,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $2,252,800,000,000.
(3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—For purposes of the
enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels
of total budget outlays are as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $1,508,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,579,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,634,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,698,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,777,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,825,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,889,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $1,973,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $2,053,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010: $2,139,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $2,230,200,000,000.
(4) SURPLUSES.—For purposes of the enforce-
ment of this resolution, the amounts of the surpluses
are as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $115,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $56,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $64,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $57,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $39,100,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2006: $46,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $58,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $68,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $89,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010: $116,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $156,800,000,000.
(5) PUBLIC DEBT.—The appropriate levels of
the public debt are as follows:
Fiscal year 2001: $5,575,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $5,623,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $5,674,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $5,733,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $5,807,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $5,875,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $5,928,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $5,969,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $5,988,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010: $6,344,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011: $6,721,000,000,000.
SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.
The Congress determines and declares that the ap-
propriate levels of new budget authority and budget out-
lays for fiscal years 2001 through 2011 for each major
functional category are:
(1) National Defense (050):
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$310,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $300,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$324,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $319,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$333,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $325,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$342,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $334,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$352,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $347,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$362,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $354,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$372,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $361,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$382,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $375,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$393,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $386,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$404,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $397,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$416,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $409,200,000,000.
(2) International Affairs (150):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$22,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$23,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$23,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$24,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$25,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$26,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$26,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$27,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$28,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$28,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$29,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $25,000,000,000.
(3) General Science, Space, and Technology
(250):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$21,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$22,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,000,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$22,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$23,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$23,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$24,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$24,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$25,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$1,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$1,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$2,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$2,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$2,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$2,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $900,000,000.
(5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$28,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $26,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$26,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $26,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$26,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$27,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$27,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$28,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$28,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $28,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$29,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $28,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$30,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $29,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$31,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$32,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,500,000,000.
(6) Agriculture (350):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$26,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$19,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$17,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$15,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$15,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$15,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,700,000,000.
(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
Fiscal year 2001:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$2,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$7,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $4,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$8,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $3,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$13,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$13,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$13,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.
(8) Transportation (400):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$62,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $51,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$61,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $55,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$58,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$59,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $60,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$59,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $62,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$60,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $63,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$60,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $64,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$61,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $66,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$61,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $68,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$62,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $69,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$63,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $71,200,000,000.
(9) Community and Regional Development
(450):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$10,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$10,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$10,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$10,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.
(10) Education, Training, Employment, and
Social Services (500):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$76,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $69,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$82,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $76,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$82,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $81,700,000,000.
•HCON 83 EH
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$83,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $82,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$87,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $84,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$90,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $87,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$92,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $90,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$95,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $93,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$98,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $95,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$100,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $98,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$104,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $101,400,000,000.
(11) Health (550):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$182,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $175,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$204,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $201,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$229,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $225,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$246,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $244,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$253,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $251,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$266,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $264,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$287,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $284,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$307,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $305,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$329,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $327,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$354,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $352,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$382,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $380,200,000,000.
(12) Medicare (570):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$217,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $217,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$229,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $229,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$243,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $243,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$260,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $260,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$291,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$309,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $309,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$336,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $336,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$362,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $362,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$391,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $390,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$423,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $423,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$459,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $459,400,000,000.
(13) Income Security (600):
Fiscal year 2001:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$255,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $256,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$271,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $272,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$281,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $282,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$293,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $292,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$308,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $306,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$315,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $314,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$323,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $321,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$337,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $336,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$349,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $347,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$359,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $358,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$371,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $369,400,000,000.
(14) Social Security (650):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$9,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$11,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$13,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$15,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$17,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$20,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
(15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$46,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $45,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$52,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $51,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$53,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $52,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$55,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $54,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$59,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$58,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$58,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $57,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$62,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $61,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$63,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $63,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$64,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $64,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$67,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $66,700,000,000.
(16) Administration of Justice (750):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$30,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$30,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$31,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $32,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$33,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$34,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$35,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $35,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$36,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $36,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$37,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $37,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$38,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$39,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$40,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $40,200,000,000.
(17) General Government (800):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$16,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$17,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$17,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$17,900,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$18,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$19,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,900,000,000.
(18) Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$273,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $273,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$257,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $257,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$253,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $253,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$248,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $248,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$242,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $242,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$239,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $239,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$236,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $236,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$233,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $233,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$229,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $229,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$224,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $224,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$219,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $219,100,000,000.
(19) Allowances (920):
Fiscal year 2001:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$5,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$5,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $4,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$6,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $4,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$6,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$6,400,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$6,600,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$6,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$7,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$7,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$7,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.
(20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$38,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$38,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$42,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$42,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$52,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$52,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$53,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$53,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$45,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$45,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$46,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$46,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$48,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$48,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
•HCON 83 EH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$49,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$49,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$50,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$50,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$51,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$51,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$53,300,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$53,300,000,000.
SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.
(a) SUBMISSIONS BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
WAYS AND MEANS FOR TAX RELIEF.—The House Com-
mittee on Ways and Means shall—
(1) report to the House a reconciliation bill—
(A) not later than May 2, 2001;
(B) not later than May 23, 2001; and
(C) not later than June 20, 2001; and
•HCON 83 EH
(2) submit to the Committee on the Budget rec-
ommendations pursuant to section (c)(2)(F)(ii) not
later than September 11, 2001,
that consists of changes in laws within its jurisdiction suf-
ficient to reduce the total level of revenues by not more
than: 
$5,783,000,000 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2001,
$64,427,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $80,036,000,000
for fiscal year 2003, $106,584,000,000 for fiscal year
2004, 
$130,973,000,000 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2005,
$165,166,000,000 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2006, 
and
$1,625,951,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001
through 2011.
(b) SUBMISSIONS BY HOUSE COMMITTEES ON EN-
ERGY AND COMMERCE AND WAYS AND MEANS FOR MEDI-
CARE REFORM AND PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.—(1) Not later
than July 24, 2001, the House Committees named in
paragraph (2) shall submit their recommendations to the
House Committee on the Budget. After receiving those
recommendations, the House Committee on the Budget
shall report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out
all such recommendations without any substantive revi-
sion.
(2)(A) The House Committee on Energy and Com-
merce shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays
•HCON 83 EH
by not more than the following: $2,500,000,000 for fiscal
year 2001, $11,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2002,
$12,900,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $14,800,000,000
for fiscal year 2004, $12,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,
$12,800,000,000 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2006, 
and
$153,000,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001
through 2011.
(B) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by not more
than the following: $2,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2001,
$11,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $12,900,000,000
for fiscal year 2003, $14,800,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,
$12,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $12,800,000,000
for fiscal year 2006, and $153,000,000,000 for the period
of fiscal year 2001 through 2011.
(c) OTHER SUBMISSIONS BY HOUSE COMMITTEES.—
(1) Not later than September 11, 2001, the House Com-
mittees named in paragraph (2) shall submit their rec-
ommendations to the House Committee on the Budget.
After receiving those recommendations, the House Com-
mittee on the Budget shall report to the House a reconcili-
ation bill carrying out all such recommendations without
any substantive revision.
•HCON 83 EH
(2)(A) The House Committee on Education and the
Workforce shall report changes in laws within its jurisdic-
tion that provide direct spending sufficient to increase out-
lays by not more than the following: $5,000,000 for fiscal
year 2001, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $5,000,000
for fiscal year 2003, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,
$7,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $10,000,000 for fiscal
year 2006, and $87,000,000 for the period of fiscal year
2001 through 2011.
(B) The House Committee on Energy and Commerce
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by
not more than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001,
$180,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $466,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2003, $561,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,
$681,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $836,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2006, and $7,867,000,000 for the period of fiscal
year 2001 through 2011.
(C) The House Committee on Financial Services shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending sufficient to reduce revenues, as follows:
$0 for fiscal year 2001, $139,000,000 for fiscal year 2002,
$101,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $92,000,000 for fiscal
year 
2004, 
$96,000,000 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2005,
•HCON 83 EH
$101,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $1,112,000,000
for the period of fiscal year 2001 through 2011.
(D) The House Committee on Government Reform
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays by not
less than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001, $0 for
fiscal year 2002, $496,000,000 for fiscal year 2003,
$523,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, $501,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2005, $475,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and
$3,871,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001 through
2011.
(E) The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by not more
than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001, $264,000,000
for fiscal year 2002, $479,000,000 for fiscal year 2003,
$761,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, $816,000,000 for fis-
cal year 2005, $885,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and
$7,087,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001 through
2011.
(F)(i) The House Committee on Ways and Means
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by
not more than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001,
$820,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $3,035,000,000 for fis-
•HCON 83 EH
cal year 2003, $2,842,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,
$3,925,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $4,267,000,000 for
fiscal year 2006, and $39,515,000,000 for the period of
fiscal year 2001 through 2011.
(ii) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to
reduce the total level of revenues as specified in subsection
(a).
(d) SPECIAL RULES.—In the House, if any bill re-
ported 
pursuant 
to 
subsection 
(a) 
or 
subsection
(c)(2)(F)(ii), amendment thereto or conference report
thereon, has refundable tax provisions that increase out-
lays, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget may
increase the amount of new budget authority provided by
such provisions (and outlays flowing therefrom) allocated
to the Committee on Ways and Means and adjust the rev-
enue levels set forth in such subsection accordingly such
that the increase in outlays and reduction in revenue re-
sulting from such bill does not exceed the amounts speci-
fied in subsection (a) or subsection (c)(2)(F)(ii), as appli-
cable.
SEC. 5. RESERVE FUND FOR EMERGENCIES.
(a) ALLOCATIONS FOR EMERGENCIES.—(1) In the
House, in addition to the allocation provided under section
302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the joint
•HCON 83 EH
explanatory statement of managers accompanying this
resolution 
shall 
include 
a 
separate 
allocation 
of
$5,627,000,000 
in 
new 
budget 
authority 
and
$2,617,000,000 in outlays for emergencies for natural dis-
asters for fiscal year 2002 to the Committee on Appropria-
tions. Such allocation shall be deemed to be an allocation
made under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget
Act of 1974 for purposes of section 302(f)(1).
(2) In the House, after the reporting of a bill or joint
resolution by the Committee on Appropriations, or the of-
fering of an amendment thereto or the submission of a
conference report thereon, the chairman of the Committee
on Appropriations shall suballocate the amounts of new
budget authority and outlays allocated to it under para-
graph (1) by the amount provided by that measure for
an emergency for natural disasters as defined by this sec-
tion and so designated pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)
of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985. Suballocations under this paragraph may be
made only after the Committee on Appropriations has re-
ported legislation (as adjusted for any amendments there-
to or conference reports thereon) providing at least
$1,923,000,000 in new budget authority for fiscal year
2002 for accounts identified in the joint explanatory state-
ment of managers accompanying the conference report on
•HCON 83 EH
this resolution. Such suballocations shall be deemed to be
suballocations made under section 302(b) of the Congres-
sional Budget Act of 1974 for purposes of section
302(f)(1).
(b) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:
(1) The term ‘‘emergency’’ means a situation
(other than a threat to national security) that—
(A) requires new budget authority (and
outlays flowing therefrom) to prevent the immi-
nent loss of life or property or in response to
the loss of life or property; and
(B) is unanticipated.
(2) The term ‘‘unanticipated’’ means that the
underlying situation is—
(A) sudden, which means quickly coming
into being or not building up over time;
(B) urgent, which means a pressing and
compelling need requiring immediate action;
(C) unforeseen, which means not predicted
or anticipated as an emerging need; and
(D) temporary, which means not of a per-
manent duration.
(c) DEVELOPMENT
OF GUIDELINES.—As soon as
practicable, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget
of the House shall, after consulting with the chairman of
•HCON 83 EH
the Committee on Appropriations of the House, publish
in the Congressional Record guidelines for application of
the definition of emergency set forth in subsection (b).
(d) COMMITTEE EXPLANATION OF EMERGENCY LEG-
ISLATION.—Whenever the Committee on Appropriations
of the House (including a committee of conference) reports
any bill or joint resolution that provides new budget au-
thority for any emergency, the report accompanying that
bill or joint resolution (or the joint explanatory statement
of managers in the case of a conference report on any such
bill or joint resolution) should explain the reasons such
amount designated under section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Bal-
anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
falls within the definition of emergency set forth in sub-
section (b) pursuant to the guidelines published under
subsection (c).
(e) CBO REPORT ON THE BUDGET.—The Director
of the Congressional Budget Office shall include in each
report submitted under section 202(e)(1) of the Congres-
sional Budget Act of 1974 the average annual enacted lev-
els of discretionary budget authority and the resulting out-
lays for emergencies for the 5 fiscal years preceding the
fiscal year of the most recently agreed to concurrent reso-
lution on the budget.
•HCON 83 EH
(f) 
SECTION
314(b)(1)
ADJUSTMENT.—Section
314(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 shall
not apply in the House—
(1) for fiscal year 2001; or
(2) for fiscal year 2002 or any subsequent fiscal
year, except for emergencies affecting national secu-
rity.
SEC. 6. STRATEGIC RESERVE FUND.
(a) ADJUSTMENTS.—In the House, the chairman of
the Committee on the Budget may, not later than July
25, 2001, increase allocations of new budget authority
(and outlays flowing therefrom) and adjust aggregates
(and adjust any other appropriate levels) for fiscal year
2002 for a bill making appropriations for the Department
of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002,
and for any fiscal year for a bill to reauthorize title I of
the Federal Agriculture Improvement Act of 1996 and
other appropriate legislation, reported by July 11, 2001,
and legislation to provide for medicare reform and a pre-
scription drug benefit; and, in the House, the chairman
may also make adjustments for amendments to or con-
ference reports on such bills. The chairman shall consider
the recommendations of the President’s National Defense
Review, any comparable review by the President of na-
tional agricultural policy, and any statement of adminis-
•HCON 83 EH
trative policy or supplemental budget request relating to
any matter referred to in the preceding sentence.
(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The adjustments for any bill
referred to in subsection (a) shall be in an amount not
to exceed the amount by which such bill breaches the ap-
plicable allocation or aggregate.
(2) The total adjustments made under subsection (a)
for any fiscal year may not cause the surplus set forth
in this resolution for any fiscal year, as adjusted, covered
by this resolution to be less than the surplus of the Fed-
eral Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for that fiscal year,
as determined consistent with procedures set forth in H.R.
2 (107th Congress), as passed the House.
SEC. 7. SUPPLEMENTAL RESERVE FUND FOR MEDICARE.
In the House, whenever a reconciliation bill is re-
ported, or an amendment thereto is offered or a conference
report thereon is submitted, under section 4, the chairman
of the Committee on the Budget may, for any of fiscal
years 2001 through 2011, increase any allocations and ag-
gregates of new budget authority (and outlays resulting
therefrom) up to the amount provided by that measure
to reform medicare and provide coverage for prescription
drugs that is in excess of the instruction to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Ways
and Means under section 4(b) (and make all other appro-
•HCON 83 EH
priate adjustments). The total adjustments made under
this section for any fiscal year may not exceed the amount
by which the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of
the President’s prescription drug plan (or, if such a plan
is not submitted in a timely manner, the Congressional
Budget Office’s estimate of a comparable plan submitted
by the chairmen of the committees of jurisdiction at levels
to be determined by the chairman of the Committee on
the Budget) exceeds the levels set forth in section 4(b)(2)
for the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2011.
SEC. 8. RESERVE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001.
(a) ADJUSTMENTS.—In the House, the chairman of
the Committee on the Budget may increase allocations of
new budget authority (and outlays flowing therefrom) and
adjust aggregates (and adjust any other appropriate lev-
els) for fiscal year 2001 for reported bills, or amendments
thereto or conference reports thereon: (1) by the amount
of new budget authority (and the outlays resulting there-
from) provided by such measure to eliminate shortfalls for
the Department of Defense, for assistance for producers
of program crops and specialty crops, and for other critical
needs; and (2) by the amount of reduction in revenue
caused by such measure providing immediate tax relief.
(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The adjustments for any bill
referred to in subsection (a) shall be in an amount not
•HCON 83 EH
to exceed the amount by which such bill breaches the ap-
plicable allocation or aggregate.
(2) The total adjustments made under subsection (a)
for fiscal year 2001 may not cause the surplus set forth
in this resolution for that fiscal year, as adjusted, to be
less than the surplus of the Federal Hospital Insurance
Trust Fund for that fiscal year, as determined consistent
with procedures set forth in H.R. 2 (107th Congress), as
passed the House.
SEC. 9. RESERVE FUND FOR PROMOTION OF FULL FUND-
ING FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION.
In the House, whenever the Committee on Appropria-
tions reports a bill or joint resolution, or an amendment
thereto is offered, or a conference report thereon is sub-
mitted that provides new budget authority for fiscal year
2002 in excess of $6,368,000,000 for programs authorized
under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA), the chairman of the Committee on the Budget
may increase the appropriate allocations of new budget au-
thority and outlays by the amount of that excess, but not
to exceed $1,250,000,000 (and adjust any other appro-
priate levels).
•HCON 83 EH
SEC. 10. RESERVE FUND FOR ADDITIONAL TAX CUTS AND
DEBT REDUCTION.
If the report provided pursuant to section 202(e)(2)
of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the budget and
economic outlook: update (for fiscal years 2002 through
2011), estimates an on-budget surplus for any of fiscal
years 2001 through 2011 that exceeds the estimated on-
budget surplus set forth in the Congressional Budget Of-
fice’s January 2001 budget and economic outlook for such
fiscal year, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget
of the House may, in an amount not to exceed the increase
in such surplus for that fiscal year—
(1) reduce the recommended level of Federal
revenues and make other appropriate adjustments
(including the reconciliation instructions) for that
fiscal year;
(2) reduce the appropriate level of the public
debt, increase the amount of the surplus, and make
other appropriate adjustments for that fiscal year;
or
(3) any combination of paragraphs (1) and (2).
SEC. 11. APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ALLO-
CATIONS AND AGGREGATES.
(a) APPLICATION.—Any adjustments of allocations
and aggregates made pursuant to this resolution shall—
•HCON 83 EH
(1) apply while that measure is under consider-
ation;
(2) take effect upon the enactment of that
measure; and
(3) be published in the Congressional Record as
soon as practicable.
(b) EFFECT OF CHANGED ALLOCATIONS AND AG-
GREGATES.—Revised allocations and aggregates resulting
from these adjustments shall be considered for the pur-
poses of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as alloca-
tions and aggregates contained in this resolution.
(c) BUDGET COMMITTEE DETERMINATIONS.—For
purposes of this resolution—
(1) the levels of new budget authority, outlays,
direct spending, new entitlement authority, revenues,
deficits, and surpluses for a fiscal year or period of
fiscal years shall be determined on the basis of esti-
mates made by the Committee on the Budget of the
House of Representatives; and
(2) such chairman, as applicable, may make
any other necessary adjustments to such levels to
carry out this resolution, and any adjustments per-
mitted under sections 6, 7, and 8 may include
changes in the appropriate reconciliation instruc-
tions.
•HCON 83 EH
SEC. 12. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 13301 OF THE BUDG-
ET ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1990.
(a) IN GENERAL.—In the House, notwithstanding
section 302(a)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974 and section 13301 of the Budget Enforcement Act
of 1990, the joint explanatory statement accompanying
the conference report on any concurrent resolution on the
budget shall include in its allocation under section 302(a)
of such Act to the Committee on Appropriations amounts
for the discretionary administrative expenses of the Social
Security Administration.
(b) SPECIAL RULE.—In the House, for purposes of
applying section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act
of 1974, estimates of the level of total new budget author-
ity and total outlays provided by a measure shall include
any discretionary amounts provided for the Social Security
Administration.
SEC. 13. RESTRICTIONS ON ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS.
For purposes of title III of the Congressional Budget
Act of 1974, advance appropriations shall be scored as
new budget authority for the fiscal year in which the ap-
propriations are enacted, except that advance appropria-
tions up to the levels specified in the joint explanatory
statement of managers accompanying this resolution for
programs, projects, activities or accounts identified in
such joint statement shall continue to be scored as new
•HCON 83 EH
(4) The Office of Management and Budget has
requested that Federal agencies plan their fiscal
year 2002 budgets with a 3.6 percent pay raise for
civilian Federal employees.
(5) In almost every year during the past 2 dec-
ades, there have been equal adjustments in the com-
pensation of members of the uniformed services and
the compensation of civilian employees of the United
States.
(b) SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—
It is the sense of the House of Representatives that rates
of compensation for civilian employees of the United
States should be adjusted at the same time, and in the
same proportion, as are rates of compensation for mem-
bers of the uniformed services.
SEC. 15. ASSET BUILDING FOR THE WORKING POOR.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress find the following:
(1) For the vast majority of United States
households, the pathway to the economic main-
stream and financial security is not through spend-
ing and consumption, but through savings, investing,
and the accumulation of assets.
(2) One-third of all Americans have no assets
available for investment and another 20 percent
have only negligible assets. The situation is even
•HCON 83 EH
more serious for minority households; for example,
60 percent of African-American households have no
or negative financial assets.
(3) Nearly 50 percent of all children in America
live in households that have no assets available for
investment, including 40 percent of Caucasian chil-
dren and 73 percent of African-American children.
(4) Up to 20 percent of all United States
households do not deposit their savings in financial
institutions and, thus, do not have access to the
basic financial tools that make asset accumulation
possible.
(5) Public policy can have either a positive or
a negative impact on asset accumulation. Traditional
public assistance programs based on income and
consumption have rarely been successful in sup-
porting the transition to economic self-sufficiency.
Tax policy, through $288,000,000,000 in annual tax
incentives, has helped lay the foundation for the
great middle class.
(6) Lacking an income tax liability, low-income
working families cannot take advantage of asset de-
velopment incentives available through the Federal
tax code.
•HCON 83 EH
(7) Individual Development Accounts have prov-
en to be successful in helping low-income working
families save and accumulate assets. Individual De-
velopment Accounts have been used to purchase
long-term, high-return assets, including homes, post-
secondary education and training, and small busi-
ness.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Federal tax code should support a signifi-
cant expansion of Individual Development Accounts so
that millions of low-income, working families can save,
build assets, and move their lives forward; thus, making
positive contributions to the economic and social well-
being of the United States, as well as to its future.
SEC. 16. FEDERAL FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANCE.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Increased demands on firefighting and
emergency medical personnel have made it difficult
for local governments to adequately fund necessary
fire safety precautions.
(2) The Government has an obligation to pro-
tect the health and safety of the firefighting per-
sonnel of the United States and to ensure that they
have the financial resources to protect the public.
•HCON 83 EH
(3) The high rates in the United States of
death, injury, and property damage caused by fires
demonstrates a critical need for Federal investment
in support of firefighting personnel.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Government should support the core oper-
ations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency by
providing needed fire grant programs to assist our fire-
fighters and rescue personnel as they respond to more
than 17,000,000 emergency calls annually. To accomplish
this task, Congress supports preservation of the Assist-
ance to Firefighters grant program. Continued support of
the Assistance to Firefighters grant program will enable
local firefighters to adequately protect the lives of count-
less Americans put at risk by insufficient fire protection.
SEC. 17. SALES TAX DEDUCTION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The House finds that—
(1) in 1986 the ability to deduct State sales
taxes was eliminated from the Federal tax code;
(2) the States of Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming,
Washington, Florida, Nevada, and South Dakota
have no State income tax;
(3) the citizens of those seven States continue
to be treated unfairly by paying significantly more in
taxes to the Government than taxpayers with an
•HCON 83 EH
identical profile in different State because they are
prohibited from deducting their State sales taxes
from their Federal income taxes in lieu of a State
income tax;
(4) the design of the Federal tax code is pref-
erential in its treatment of States with State income
taxes over those without State income taxes;
(5) the current Federal tax code infringes upon
States’ rights to tax their citizens as they see fit in
that the Federal tax code exerts unjust influence on
States without State income taxes to impose one
their citizens;
(6) the current surpluses that our Government
holds provide an appropriate time and opportunity
to allow taxpayers to deduct either their State sales
taxes or their State income taxes from their Federal
income tax returns; and
(7) over 50 Members of the House have cospon-
sored legislation to restore the sales tax deduction
option to the Federal tax code.
(b) SENSE OF HOUSE.—It is the sense of the House
of Representatives that the Committee on Ways and
Means should consider legislation that makes State sales
tax deductible against Federal income taxes.
•HCON 83 EH
SEC. 18. FUNDING FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION
AT CHILDREN’S TEACHING HOSPITALS.
It is the sense of Congress that:
(1) Function 550 of the President’s budget
should include an appropriate level of funding for
graduate medical education conducted at inde-
pendent children’s teaching hospitals in order to en-
sure access to care by millions of children nation-
wide.
(2) An emphasis should be placed on the role
played by community health centers in underserved
rural and urban communities. An increase in fund-
ing for community health centers should not come at
the expense of the Community Access Program.
Both programs should be funded adequately, with
the intention of doubling funding for increased ca-
pacity for community health centers, in addition to
keeping the Community Access Program operational.
(3) The medicare program should emphasize
such preventive medical services as those provided by
vision rehabilitation professionals in saving Govern-
ment funds and preserving the independence of a
growing number of seniors in the coming years.
(4) Funding under function 550 should also re-
flect the importance of the Ryan White CARE Act
to persons afflicted with HIV/AIDS. Funds allocated
•HCON 83 EH
from the CARE Act serve as the safety net for thou-
sands of low-income people living with HIV/AIDS
who reside in metropolitan areas but are ineligible
for entitlement programs. Moreover, the CARE Act
provides critically needed grants directly to existing
community-based clinics and public health providers
to develop and deliver both early and ongoing com-
prehensive services to persons with HIV/AIDS.
SEC. 19. CONCURRENT RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY BEN-
EFITS TO RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that the Secretary of
Defense is the appropriate official for evaluating the exist-
ing standards for the provision of concurrent retirement
and disability benefits to retired members of the Armed
Forces and the need to change these standards.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that—
(1) the Secretary of Defense should report to
the congressional committees of jurisdiction on the
provision of concurrent retirement and disability
benefits to retired members of the Armed Forces;
(2) the report should address the number of in-
dividuals retired from the Armed Forces who would
otherwise be eligible for disability compensation, the
•HCON 83 EH
comparability of the policy to Office of Personnel
Management guidelines for civilian Federal retirees,
the applicability of this policy to prevailing private
sector standards, the number of individuals poten-
tially eligible for concurrent benefits who receive
other forms of Federal assistance and the cost of
that assistance, and alternative initiatives that would
accomplish the same end as concurrent receipt of
military retired pay and disability compensation;
(3) the Secretary of Defense should submit leg-
islation that he considers appropriate; and
(4) upon receiving such report, the committees
of jurisdiction, working with the Committees on the
Budget of the House and Senate, should consider
appropriate legislation.
Passed the House of Representatives March 28,
2001.
Attest:
Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 83
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Establishing the congressional budget for the
United States Government for fiscal year 2002,
revising the congressional budget for the United
States Government for fiscal year 2001, and set-
ting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each
of fiscal years 2003 through 2011.