195 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
2. NC 
Carolina Beach 
Integrated 
Beach Re-
nourishment 
June 16, 
2020 
Federal: $24,205,000 
Non-Federal: $24,205,000 
Total: $48,410,000 
3. NC 
Wrightsville Beach 
July 2, 2020 
Federal: $53,788,000 
Non-Federal: $22,329,000 
Total: $76,117,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$14,553,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$14,553,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$29,106,000 
4. TX 
Corpus Christi 
Ship Channel, 
Deepening and 
Widening and 
Barge Shelves 
May 4, 2020 
Federal: $403,000,000 
Non-Federal: $273,010,000 
Total: $676,010,000 
SEC. 402. SPECIAL RULES. 
(a) 
GREAT
LAKES
AND
MISSISSIPPI
RIVER 
INTERBASIN PROJECT, BRANDON ROAD, WILL COUNTY, IL-
LINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for eco-
system restoration, Great Lakes and Mississippi River 
Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois, 
authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially in ac-
cordance with the terms and conditions described in the Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 23, 2019, with 
the following modifications: 
(1) The Federal share of the cost of construction 
shall be 80 percent. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
196 
(2) The Secretary may include the addition or 
substitution of technologies or measures not described 
in the report, as the Secretary determines to be advis-
able. 
(b) WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN REVIEW REALLOCA-
TION STUDY.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
water supply, Willamette River Basin Review Reallocation, 
Oregon, authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially 
in accordance with the terms and conditions described in 
the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 18, 
2019, with the following modifications: 
(1) The Secretary shall meet the obligations of 
the Corps of Engineers under the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973 by complying with the June 2019 NMFS 
Willamette Basin Review Study Biological Opinion 
Reasonable and Prudent Alternative until such time, 
if any, as it is modified or replaced, in whole or in 
part, through the consultation process under section 
7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 
(2) The Secretary may reallocate not more than 
10 percent of overall storage in the joint conservation 
pool, as authorized by this Act and without further 
congressional action, if such reallocation is consistent 
with the ongoing consultation under section 7(a) of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
197 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 related to Wil-
lamette Valley System operations. 
(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the revised 
reallocation is not reallocated from a single storage 
use, does not seriously affect authorized project pur-
poses, and does not otherwise involve major oper-
ational changes to the project. 
(c) CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.— 
Section 5127 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 
(121 
Stat. 
1242) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$150,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$232,430,000’’. 
SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS BASED ON FEASI-
BILITY STUDIES PREPARED BY NON-FEDERAL 
INTERESTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to 
carry out the following projects for water resources develop-
ment and conservation and other purposes, subject to sub-
section (b): 
(1) FORT
PIERCE, ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLOR-
IDA.—The project for hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, as 
described in the review assessment of the Secretary, ti-
tled ‘‘Review Assessment of St. Lucie County, Florida 
Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project Section 203 Inte-
grated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assess-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00197
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
198 
ment (June 2018)’’ and dated July 2018, at a total 
cost of $33,107,639, and at an estimated total cost of 
$97,958,972 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
life of the project. 
(2) BAPTISTE COLLETTE BAYOU, LOUISIANA.— 
The project for navigation, Baptiste Collette Bayou, 
Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of 
the 
Secretary, 
titled 
‘‘Review 
Assessment 
of 
Plaquemines Parish Government’s Section 203 Study 
Baptiste Collette Bayou Navigation Channel Deep-
ening Project Integrated Feasibility Study and Envi-
ronmental Assessment (January 2017, Amended April 
2018)’’ and dated June 2018, at a total cost of 
$44,920,000. 
(3) HOUMA
NAVIGATION
CANAL, LOUISIANA.— 
The project for navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, 
Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of 
the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of Houma 
Navigation Canal Deepening Project Section 203 In-
tegrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environ-
mental Impact Statement (June 2018)’’ and dated 
July 2018, at a total cost of $253,458,000. 
(4) CHACON
CREEK, TEXAS.—The project for 
flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and 
other purposes, Chacon Creek, Texas, as described in 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00198
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
199 
the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review 
Assessment of Chacon Creek, Texas Section 203 Inte-
grated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environ-
mental Assessment (August 2018)’’ and dated Sep-
tember 2018, at a total cost of $51,973,000. 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may only carry 
out a project authorized under subsection (a)— 
(1) substantially in accordance with the applica-
ble review assessment for the project submitted by the 
Secretary under section 203(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, as identified in subsection 
(a) of this section, and subject to such modifications 
or conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate 
and identifies in a final assessment that addresses the 
concerns, recommendations, and conditions identified 
by the Secretary in the applicable review assessment; 
and 
(2) after the Secretary transmits to the Com-
mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Envi-
ronment and Public Works of the Senate such final 
assessment. 
(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 203(c)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2231(c)(1)) is amended, in the matter preceding subpara-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00199
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
200 
graph (A), by striking ‘‘a report’’ and inserting ‘‘an assess-
ment’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00200
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 369 
116TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 7575 
[Report No. 116–460, Part I] 
A BILL 
To provide for improvements to the rivers and har-
bors of the United States, to provide for the con-
servation and development of water and related 
resources, and for other purposes. 
JULY 24, 2020 
Reported from the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure with an amendment 
JULY 24, 2020 
Committee on the Budget discharged; committed to the 
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:18 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00202
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H7575.RH
H7575
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS