datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(C) by striking ‘‘, and all increased reve-
nues received by the Secretary as a result of the 
increased water prices established under sub-
section 3405(d) of this section,’’. 
SEC. 105. FISH, WILDLIFE, AND HABITAT RESTORATION. 
Section 3406 of the Central Valley Project Improve-
ment Act (106 Stat. 4714) is amended as follows: 
(1) In subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(B)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘is authorized and di-
rected to’’ and inserting ‘‘may’’; 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘reasonable water’’ 
after ‘‘to provide’’; 
(iii) by striking ‘‘anadromous fish, ex-
cept that such’’ and inserting ‘‘anadromous 
fish. Such’’; 
(iv) by striking ‘‘Instream flow’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Reasonable instream flow’’; 
(v) by inserting ‘‘and the National Ma-
rine Fisheries Service’’ after ‘‘United States 
Fish and Wildlife Service’’; and 
(vi) by striking ‘‘California Depart-
ment of Fish and Game’’ and inserting 
‘‘United States Geological Survey’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2)— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:58 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1837.RH
H1837
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1582
To give any State in which lands are more than 25 percent federally owned
the right to disapprove the establishment of Wilderness Areas located
in that State.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Mr. HANSEN (for himself, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr.
STUMP, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. LEWIS of California, and Mr.
GALLEGLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Natural Resources
A BILL
To give any State in which lands are more than 25 percent
federally owned the right to disapprove the establishment
of Wilderness Areas located in that State.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILDERNESS DISAPPROVAL BY A STATE.
(a) AUTHORITY
TO
SUBMIT
NOTICE
OF
DIS-
APPROVAL.—Any State in which more than 25 percent of
the land is owned by the United States (including land
held in trust for Indians or Indian tribes) may submit to
the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the
President pro tempore of the Senate a notice of dis-
approval of the designation of an area in that State as
wilderness.
(b) NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL.—For the purpose of
this Act, the term ‘‘notice of disapproval’’ means a notice
which—
(1) disapproves the designation by Federal law
of an area as wilderness, and
(2) is submitted—
(A) on or before 90 days after the date of
enactment of the Act designating such area as
wilderness, and
(B) on behalf of a State by the Governor,
State legislature, or authority designated under
State law,
to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and
the President pro tempore of the Senate.
SEC. 2. EFFECT OF NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL.
(a) EFFECTIVE DATE OF DESIGNATION AS WILDER-
NESS AREA.—Notwithstanding any other provison of law,
the designation of an area as wilderness in a State de-
scribed in section 1(a) shall be effective at the end of the
90-day period beginning on the date of enactment of the
Act containing such designation unless, during such 90-
day period, the State in which such area is located submits
a notice of disapproval.
(b) MANAGEMENT OF AREA DURING 90-DAY PE-
RIOD.—Any area designated as wilderness by a Federal
law shall be managed during the 90-day period specified
in subsection (a) as if such area were wilderness.
(c) MANAGEMENT OF AREA AFTER SUBMISSION OF
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL.—An area with respect to which
a notice of disapproval has been submitted to the Congress
under this Act shall be managed by the appropriate Fed-
eral agency in the same manner as such area was managed
on the day before the date on which such area would have,
but for this Act, been designated as wilderness.
SEC. 3. OVERRIDE OF STATE NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL.
The Congress, by joint resolution, may override the
effect of a notice of disapproval only if such joint resolu-
tion specifically overrides such notice of disapproval.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1583
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable
debts for postpetition fees payable to a membership association with
respect to the debtor’s interest in, and for the period during which
the debtor occupied, a dwelling unit that has condominium or cooperative
ownership.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Mr. HYDE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make
nondischargeable debts for postpetition fees payable to
a membership association with respect to the debtor’s
interest in, and for the period during which the debtor
occupied, a dwelling unit that has condominium or coop-
erative ownership.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness to Condomin-
ium and Cooperative Owners Amendment of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.
Section 523(a) of title 11, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in paragraph (11) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the
end,
(2) in paragraph (12) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the
end, and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(13) for a fee that becomes payable after the
order for relief to a membership association with re-
spect to the debtor’s interest in a dwelling unit that
has condominium or cooperative ownership, if such
fee is payable for a period during which the debtor
occupied such dwelling.’’.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.
(a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub-
section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this
Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act.
(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend-
ments made by section 2 shall not apply with respect to
cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
HR 1904 RFS
SEC. 5. CONVEYANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL 
LAND. 
(a) CONVEYANCE.—On receipt of title to the Federal 
land, Resolution Copper shall simultaneously convey— 
(1) to the Secretary, all right, title, and interest 
that the Secretary determines to be acceptable in 
and to— 
(A) the approximately 147 acres of land lo-
cated in Gila County, Arizona, depicted on the 
map entitled ‘‘Southeast Arizona Land Ex-
change and Conservation Act of 2011–Non- 
Federal Parcel–Turkey Creek’’ and dated 
March 2011; 
(B) the approximately 148 acres of land 
located in Yavapai County, Arizona, depicted on 
the map entitled ‘‘Southeast Arizona Land Ex-
change and Conservation Act of 2011–Non- 
Federal 
Parcel–Tangle 
Creek’’ 
and 
dated 
March 2011; 
(C) the approximately 149 acres of land lo-
cated in Maricopa County, Arizona, depicted on 
the map entitled ‘‘Southeast Arizona Land Ex-
change and Conservation Act of 2011–Non- 
Federal Parcel–Cave Creek’’ and dated March 
2011; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:23 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1904.RFS
H1904
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1838 
To repeal a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act prohibiting any Federal bailout of swap dealers or participants. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 11, 2011 
Ms. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agri-
culture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdic-
tion of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To repeal a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 
and Consumer Protection Act prohibiting any Federal 
bailout of swap dealers or participants. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REPEAL. 
Section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 
and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 8305) is re-
pealed. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:19 May 14, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1838.IH
H1838
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1585
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard
mileage rate deduction for charitable use of passenger automobiles.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase
the standard mileage rate deduction for charitable use
of passenger automobiles.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE EX-
PENSE DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE USE OF
PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard
mileage rate for use of passenger automobile) is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘(i) STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR USE OF PAS-
SENGER AUTOMOBILE.—
‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—Except as provided in
paragraph (2), for purposes of computing the deduc-
tion under this section for use of a passenger auto-
mobile, the standard mileage rate shall be 16 cents
per mile.
‘‘(2) SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary ad-
justs the business standard mileage rate for any
period after 1993, the Secretary shall also ad-
just the standard mileage rate set forth in para-
graph (1). The adjustment in the rate set forth
in paragraph (1) shall be made in a manner
consistent with the adjustment to the business
standard mileage rate; except that only costs al-
lowable as a deduction under this section shall
be taken into account.
‘‘(B) 
BUSINESS
STANDARD
MILEAGE
RATE.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the
term ‘business standard mileage rate’ means
the standard mileage rate which may be used in
computing the deduction under section 162 for
the use of a passenger automobile.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1992.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3593 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ‘‘National Clandes-
tine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David 
Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 7, 2011 
Ms. HAYWORTH (for herself, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New 
York, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. GRIMM, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 
SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 
OWENS, Mr. HANNA, Ms. BUERKLE, Ms. HOCHUL, and Mr. REED) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Over-
sight and Government Reform 
A BILL 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, 
as the ‘‘National Clandestine Service of the Central Intel-
ligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memo-
rial Post Office’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:49 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3593.IH
H3593
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE 
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY NCS OFFI-
CER GREGG DAVID WENZEL MEMORIAL POST 
OFFICE. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, 
New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Na-
tional Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence 
Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 
Office’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘National Clandestine 
Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 
Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:49 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3593.IH
H3593
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 703. DUTIES OF IV–D AGENCIES.
Section 454 (42 U.S.C. 654), as amended by section
702, is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para-
graph (29), by striking the period at the end of paragraph
(30) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by inserting after para-
graph (30) the following new paragraph:
‘‘(31) provide that the State agency administer-
ing the plan shall provide to all custodial parents—
‘‘(A) a written description of available
services and a statement articulating the prior-
ity of distribution and the degree of confiden-
tiality of information;
‘‘(B) a statement that before the agency
consents to a dismissal with prejudice or a re-
duction of arrearages, the agency shall provide
notice to the last known address at least 30
days before dismissal;
‘‘(C) written quarterly reports on case sta-
tus;
‘‘(D) a statement that services under this
part are mandatory if an individual is deter-
mined eligible under part A; and
‘‘(E) a statement that while eligibility
under part A is being determined, an applicant
is eligible for services under this part and all
(C) GROUP
HEALTH
PLAN.—The term 
‘‘group health plan’’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 733(a)(1) of the Employee Re-
tirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 
U.S.C. 1191b(a)(1)). 
(3) 
INDEPENDENT
PHARMACY.—The 
term 
‘‘independent pharmacy’’ means a pharmacy that 
has a market share of— 
(A) less than 10 percent in any PDP re-
gion; and 
(B) less than 1 percent in the United 
States. 
For purposes of the preceding sentence, all phar-
macies that are members of the same controlled 
group of corporations (within the meaning of section 
267(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) and 
all pharmacies under common control (within the 
meaning of section 52(b) of such Code but deter-
mined by treating an interest of more than 50 per-
cent as a controlling interest) shall be treated as 1 
pharmacy. 
(4) PDP REGION.—The term ‘‘PDP region’’ 
has the meaning given such term in section 1860D– 
11(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w–111(a)(2)). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:19 May 14, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1839.IH
H1839
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(j) 5-YEAR SUNSET.—The exemption provided in 
subsection (a) shall only apply to conduct occurring during 
the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act and shall continue to apply for 1 year after 
the end of such period to contracts entered into before 
the end of such period. 
(k) GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY AND 
REPORT.—The Comptroller General of the United States 
shall conduct a study on the impact of enactment of this 
section during the 6-month period beginning with the 5th 
year of the 5-year period described in subsection (j). Not 
later than the end of such 6-month period, the Comptroller 
General shall submit to Congress a report on such study 
and shall include in the report such recommendations on 
the extension of this section (and changes that should be 
made in making such extension) as the Comptroller Gen-
eral deems appropriate. 
(l) OVERSIGHT.—Nothing in this section shall pre-
clude the Federal Trade Commission or the Department 
of Justice from overseeing the conduct of independent 
pharmacies covered under this section. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:19 May 14, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1839.IH
H1839
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1587
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt the triple base acreage
of the producers on a farm from the highly erodible land and wetland
conservation requirements of such Act, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. SMITH of Oregon,
Mr. ALLARD, and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt the
triple base acreage of the producers on a farm from
the highly erodible land and wetland conservation re-
quirements of such Act, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF TRIPLE BASE ACREAGE FROM
CERTAIN CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS.
(a) HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND CONSERVATION.—Sec-
tion 1212 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
3812) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
HR 1587 IH
‘‘(i) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
producers on a farm—
‘‘(1) may designate the specific acres on the
farm that are in a quantity equal to the crop acre-
age base for a crop on the farm less the quantity of
payment 
acres 
for 
the 
crop 
under 
section
107B(c)(1)(C)(ii), 
105B(c)(1)(C)(ii),
103B(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 101B(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Agri-
cultural 
Act 
of 
1949 
(7 
U.S.C. 
1445b-
3a(c)(1)(C)(ii), 
1444f(c)(1)(C)(ii), 
1444-
2(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 1441-2(c)(1)(C)(ii)); and
‘‘(2) shall be exempt from the requirements of
this subtitle with respect to the specific acres that
are designated under paragraph (1).’’.
(b) WETLAND CONSERVATION.—Section 1222 of
such Act (16 U.S.C. 3822) is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
‘‘(k) PRODUCTION
ON TRIPLE BASE ACREAGE.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the producers
on a farm—
‘‘(1) may designate the specific acres on the
farm that are in a quantity equal to the crop acre-
age base for a crop on the farm less the quantity of
payment 
acres 
for 
the 
crop 
under 
section
107B(c)(1)(C)(ii), 
105B(c)(1)(C)(ii),
HR 1587 IH
103(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 101B(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Agricul-
tural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445b-3a(c)(1)(C)(ii),
or 1444f(c)(1)(C)(ii), 1444-2(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 1441-
2(c)(1)(C)(ii)); and
‘‘(2) shall be exempt from the requirements of
this subtitle with respect to the specific acres that
are designated under paragraph (1).’’.
(c) CROPS.—the amendments made by this section
shall be effective only for the 1993 through 1995 crops
of a commodity.
Æ
requirements of subparagraph (D) of such 
paragraph; and 
(iii) demonstrates that the alien’s re-
moval from the United States would result 
in extreme hardship to the alien or the 
alien’s spouse, parent, or child who is a cit-
izen or a lawful permanent resident of the 
United States. 
(B) EXTENSION.—Upon a showing of good 
cause, the Secretary may extend the period of 
permanent resident status on a conditional 
basis for an alien so that the alien may com-
plete the requirements of subparagraph (D) of 
paragraph (1). 
(3) TREATMENT OF ABANDONMENT OR RESI-
DENCE.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(C), an 
alien— 
(A) shall be presumed to have abandoned 
the alien’s residence in the United States if the 
alien is absent from the United States for more 
than 365 days, in the aggregate, during the 
alien’s period of conditional permanent resident 
status, unless the alien demonstrates to the sat-
isfaction of the Secretary that the alien has not 
abandoned such residence; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
05:18 May 18, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1842.IH
H1842
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 183 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a study on the 
acquisition of land adjacent to Beaufort National Cemetery, Beaufort, 
South Carolina. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 5, 2011 
Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 
a study on the acquisition of land adjacent to Beaufort 
National Cemetery, Beaufort, South Carolina. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STUDY ON 
THE ACQUISITION OF LAND ADJACENT TO 
BEAUFORT 
NATIONAL 
CEMETERY, 
BEAU-
FORT, SOUTH CAROLINA. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs shall carry out a study on the acquisition, in ac-
cordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:06 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H183.IH
H183
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
of the parcel of land described in subsection (b) to be used 
for the expansion of the Beaufort National Cemetery in 
Beaufort, South Carolina. 
(b) PARCEL DESCRIBED.—The parcel of land de-
scribed in this subsection is a parcel of land consisting 
of approximately 4.9 acres located on 17th Street in Beau-
fort, South Carolina, as depicted on tax map number 120– 
1–238 dated May 4, 1998. 
(c) CONTENTS OF STUDY.—In carrying out the study 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall examine each of 
the following: 
(1) Any issues associated with the purchase of 
the parcel of land described in subsection (b) by the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, and the viable sce-
narios to support such a purchase. 
(2) The opportunities for the acquisition of 
such parcel of land for the cemetery through a pub-
lic-private partnership. 
(3) The feasibility of expanding the grant pro-
gram under section 2408 of title 38, United States 
Code, to include aid to municipalities like Beaufort, 
South Carolina, for establishing, expanding, and im-
proving veterans’ cemeteries. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:06 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H183.IH
H183
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
(4) The issues associated with expanding an ex-
isting veterans’ cemetery under the state grant pro-
gram under such section 2408. 
(5) The costs, feasibility, and benefits of a 
niche wall separating Beaufort National Cemetery 
and the parcel described in subsection (b). 
(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report on the study conducted 
under subsection (a). 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:06 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H183.IH
H183
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1588
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a windfall profit
tax on certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions if they become
excessively profitable, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 1, 1993
Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose
a windfall profit tax on certain drugs for rare diseases
or conditions if they become excessively profitable, and
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WINDFALL PROFIT TAX ON PROFITS FROM
DRUGS FOR RARE DISEASES OR CONDITIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 28 of the Internal Reve-
nue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection
(e) as subsection (f) and by inserting after subsection (d)
the following new subsection: