520 
HR 1815 RFS 
(2) Contract personnel are appropriately pro-
hibited from performing inherently governmental 
functions. 
(3) Contract personnel will be present on and 
supporting the battlefield of tomorrow providing cru-
cial goods and services for military, humanitarian, 
peacekeeping, and reconstruction operations. 
SEC. 1603. DEFINITIONS. 
In this title: 
(1) 
CONTRACTOR
ACCOMPANYING
THE 
FORCE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘contractor 
accompanying the force’’ means a contractor for 
a contract with the Department of Defense, a 
subcontract at any tier under such a contract, 
or a task order at any tier issued under such 
a contract, if the contract, subcontract, or task 
order— 
(i) is paid for using funds appro-
priated to or for the use of the Depart-
ment; and 
(ii) is for the performance of work 
that directly supports United States mili-
tary 
operations 
overseas 
or 
deployed 
United States Armed Forces.
521 
HR 1815 RFS 
(B) EMPLOYEES INCLUDED.—The term in-
cludes employees of any contractor described in 
subparagraph (A). 
(2) CONTRACTOR
NOT
ACCOMPANYING
THE 
FORCE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘contractor 
not accompanying the force’’ means a con-
tractor for a contract with the Federal Govern-
ment, a subcontract at any tier under such a 
contract, or a task order at any tier issued 
under such a contract, if the contract, sub-
contract, or task order is for the performance 
of work related to private security, reconstruc-
tion, humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, or 
other activities in an area of responsibility of a 
commander of a combatant command. 
(B) EMPLOYEES INCLUDED.—The term in-
cludes employees of any contractor described in 
subparagraph (A). 
(3) COMBATANT COMMAND.—The term ‘‘com-
batant command’’ has the meaning provided in sec-
tion 161(c) of title 10, United States Code.
522 
HR 1815 RFS 
SEC. 1604. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMANDERS OF COMBAT-
ANT COMMANDS RELATING TO CONTRAC-
TORS 
ACCOMPANYING 
AND 
NOT 
ACCOM-
PANYING THE FORCE. 
(a) PROTECTION
OF
CONTRACTORS
BY
ARMED 
FORCES.— 
(1) CONTRACTORS
ACCOMPANYING
FORCE.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall require each com-
mander of a combatant command to make a deter-
mination regarding the appropriate level of security 
protection by the Armed Forces of contractors ac-
companying the force in the commander’s area of re-
sponsibility, and to include in the operational plans 
of the commander the results of the determination. 
(2) 
CONTRACTORS
NOT
ACCOMPANYING 
FORCE.—Any requirements for security protection of 
contractors accompanying the force included in oper-
ational plans under paragraph (1) may also be ap-
plied by the commander to contractors not accom-
panying the force. 
(b) COMMUNICATIONS PLAN.— 
(1) CONTRACTORS
ACCOMPANYING
FORCE.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall require each com-
mander of a combatant command to include in the 
operational plans of the commander a communica-
523 
HR 1815 RFS 
tions plan for contractors accompanying the force in 
the commander’s area of responsibility. 
(2) 
CONTRACTORS
NOT
ACCOMPANYING 
FORCE.—Such communications plan may be applied 
by the commander to contractors not accompanying 
the force in such area. 
(3) PROVISION OF PLAN TO CONTRACTORS.— 
Any communications plan included in operational 
plans under this subsection shall be provided by the 
commander concerned to the affected contractors. 
(c) SHARING INTELLIGENCE.— 
(1) CONTRACTORS
ACCOMPANYING
FORCE.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall require each com-
mander of a combatant command to share with con-
tractors accompanying the force open-source intel-
ligence, threat assessments, and information related 
to contractor movement to avoid hostile or friendly 
fire incidents and to further the missions of both the 
Department of Defense and the contractors. 
(2) 
CONTRACTORS
NOT
ACCOMPANYING 
FORCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall require 
each commander of a combatant command to share, 
to the extent practicable, the intelligence, assess-
ments, and information referred to in paragraph (1) 
with contractors not accompanying the force.
524 
HR 1815 RFS 
(3) WAIVER.—The commander of a combatant 
command may waive the requirements of this sub-
section if required to ensure operational security in 
the commander’s area of responsibility. 
SEC. 1605. REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTORS RELATING 
TO POSSESSION OF WEAPONS. 
(a) REQUIREMENT FOR REGULATIONS REGARDING 
CARRYING WEAPONS FOR CONTRACTORS ACCOMPANYING 
FORCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regula-
tions describing the type of weapons and circumstances 
under which contractors accompanying the force may 
carry a weapon for self defense or in order to perform 
work required under the contract, and information re-
quired to be provided by such contractors relating to such 
weapons. The regulations shall include the following: 
(1) A requirement that a contractor accom-
panying the force request in writing approval, from 
the commander of the combatant command for the 
area in which the contractor is performing work 
under a contract, for the contractor to carry weap-
ons. 
(2) Subject to subsection (b), a requirement 
that the commander of a combatant command deter-
mine whether it is appropriate for a contractor ac-
companying the force to carry a weapon for self de-
525 
HR 1815 RFS 
fense or in order to perform work required under the 
contract, taking into account the duties required to 
be performed under the contract and the security 
situation in the area of operations, and, if deter-
mined appropriate, to approve a request referred to 
in paragraph (1). 
(3) A requirement that any contractor accom-
panying the force that is carrying a weapon for self 
defense use only a firearm that meets United States 
military specifications for self defense and ammuni-
tion that meets United States military specifications. 
(4) A requirement that a contractor accom-
panying the force must have proof of appropriate 
training for using any firearm for self defense, as 
determined by the Secretary of Defense. 
(b) DEEMED APPROVAL FOR CARRYING WEAPON.— 
The regulations shall provide that, for purposes of the re-
quirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), 
a requirement in a contract awarded by the Department 
that a contractor carry a weapon to perform work under 
the contract shall be deemed to be approved by the com-
mander for the contractor to carry such a weapon. The 
regulations shall require that the contracting officer for 
such a contract shall notify the appropriate commander 
of any such requirement.
526 
HR 1815 RFS 
SEC. 1606. BATTLEFIELD ACCOUNTABILITY. 
(a) QUARTERLY LIST OF CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL 
IN COMMANDER’S AREA.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
require each commander of a combatant command to ob-
tain quarterly from contractors accompanying the force a 
list of all contractor personnel who are present in the com-
mander’s area of responsibility, with the following infor-
mation for each individual on the list: 
(1) Whether the individual carries a weapon. 
(2) Proof of appropriate training with respect 
to any weapon carried by the individual. 
(3) Proof of citizenship. 
(b) MEETINGS WITH CONTRACTORS.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall require each commander of a combatant 
command to meet regularly with representatives of con-
tractors both accompanying and not accompanying the 
force who are present in the commander’s area of respon-
sibility, in order to provide information about the require-
ments of the commander with respect to the contractors 
and recommendations to the contractors regarding secu-
rity for the protection of the contractors. 
(c) DATABASE.—The Secretary of Defense shall re-
quire each commander of a combatant command to main-
tain a central database of the information provided under 
subsection (a) with respect to all contractors accom-
panying the force in the commander’s area of responsi-
527 
HR 1815 RFS 
bility and shall allow the commander to maintain such a 
database with respect to contractors not accompanying the 
force. The Secretary shall prescribe a design for the infor-
mation to be collected for the database required under this 
subsection, which shall be uniform for all combatant com-
mands. To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall rely 
on existing sources in the Department of Defense for the 
information to be included in the database and make such 
existing information available to each commander. 
(d) CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENT.—Any contractor 
accompanying the force, and, upon determination of the 
commander of a combatant command concerned, any con-
tractor not accompanying the force, shall provide informa-
tion sought by a commander of a combatant command for 
purposes of subsection (a), upon request from the com-
mander. 
Division B—Military Construction 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006’’. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 
project.
528 
HR 1815 RFS 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ..........
Anniston Army Depot ........................................
$3,150,000 
Fort Rucker ........................................................
$9,700,000 
Redstone Arsenal ................................................
$4,700,000 
Alaska ..............
Fort Wainwright .................................................
$33,560,000 
Arizona ............
Ft. Huachuca .....................................................
$5,100,000 
California ........
Concord ...............................................................
$11,850,000 
Fort Irwin ...........................................................
$21,250,000 
Colorado ..........
Fort Carson ........................................................
$70,622,000 
Georgia ............
Fort Benning ......................................................
$30,261,000 
Fort Gillem .........................................................
$3,900,000 
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field ................
$57,980,000 
Hawaii .............
Pohakuloa Training Area ...................................
$43,300,000 
Schofield Barracks .............................................
$53,900,000 
Illinois .............
Rock Island Arsenal ...........................................
$7,400,000 
Indiana ............
Crane Army Ammunition Activity ......................
$5,700,000 
Kansas .............
Fort Riley ...........................................................
$23,000,000 
Kentucky .........
Fort Campbell ....................................................
$108,175,000 
Louisiana .........
Fort Polk ............................................................
$28,887,000 
Missouri ...........
Fort Leonard Wood ............................................
$8,100,000 
New Jersey ......
Picatinny Arsenal ...............................................
$4,450,000 
New York ........
Fort Drum ..........................................................
$73,350,000 
United States Military Academy, West Point ....
$4,000,000 
North Carolina 
Fort Bragg .........................................................
$301,250,000 
Ohio .................
Joint Systems Manufacturing Center, Lima ......
$11,600,000 
Oklahoma ........
Fort Sill ..............................................................
$5,850,000 
McAlester ............................................................
$6,500,000 
Pennsylvania ...
Letterkenny Depot .............................................
$6,300,000 
South Carolina 
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$1,600,000 
Texas ...............
Fort Bliss ...........................................................
$5,000,000 
Fort Hood ...........................................................
$57,888,000 
Utah ................
Dugway Proving Ground ....................................
$25,000,000 
Virginia ...........
Fort A.P. Hill .....................................................
$2,700,000 
Fort Belvoir ........................................................
$18,000,000 
Fort Lee .............................................................
$3,900,000 
Fort Myer ...........................................................
$15,200,000 
Washington .....
Fort Lewis ..........................................................
$99,949,000
529 
HR 1815 RFS 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ...........................
Grafenwoehr ..........................................
$84,081,000 
Italy ..................................
Pisa .......................................................
$5,254,000 
Korea ................................
Camp Humphreys .................................
$114,162,000 
Yongpyong .............................................
$1,450,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the 
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the 
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in 
the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Alaska ......................
Fort Richardson ............................
117 .....
$49,000,000 
Fort Wainwright ...........................
180 .....
$91,000,000 
Arizona ....................
Fort Huachuca ..............................
131 .....
$31,000,000 
Yuma Proving Ground ..................
35 .......
$11,200,000 
Oklahoma .................
Fort Sill ........................................
129 .....
$24,000,000 
Virginia ....................
Fort Lee ........................................
96 .......
$19,500,000 
Fort Monroe ..................................
21 .......
$6,000,000
530 
HR 1815 RFS 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may 
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction 
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $17,536,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), 
the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military 
family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
$300,400,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2005, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total 
amount of $2,955,400,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United States authorized by section 2101(a), 
$985,172,000.
531 
HR 1815 RFS 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by section 2101(b), 
$204,947,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, 
United States Code, $20,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $168,023,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $549,636,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including the functions described in section 
2833 of title 10, United States Code), 
$803,993,000. 
(6) For the construction of phase 3 of the 
Lewis & Clark instructional facility at Fort Leaven-
worth, Kansas, authorized by section 2101(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 
Stat. 2681), $42,642,000. 
(7) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex at Vilseck, Germany, authorized by
532 
HR 1815 RFS 
section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697), as amended by 
section 2105 of this Act, $13,600,000. 
(8) For the construction of phase 2 of the 
Drum Road upgrade at Helemano Military Reserva-
tion, Hawaii, authorized by section 2101(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 
Stat. 2101), $41,000,000. 
(9) For the construction of phase 2 a vehicle 
maintenance facility at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, 
authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 
(division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2101), $24,656,000. 
(10) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex, at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, author-
ized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B 
of 
Public 
Law 
108–375; 
118 
Stat. 
2101), 
$24,650,000. 
(11) For the construction of phase 2 of trainee 
barracks, Basic Training Complex 1 at Fort Knox, 
Kentucky, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Mili-
533 
HR 1815 RFS 
tary Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2101), $21,000,000. 
(12) For the construction of phase 2 of a li-
brary and learning center at the United States Mili-
tary Academy, West Point, New York, authorized by 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2101), $25,470,000. 
(13) For the construction of phase 2 of a bar-
racks complex renewal project at Fort Bragg, North 
Carolina, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2101), $30,611,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
(a).
534 
HR 1815 RFS 
(2) $16,500,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a 
barracks complex for Fort Drum, New York). 
(3) $31,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a 
barracks complex for the 2nd Brigade at Fort 
Bragg, North Carolina). 
(4) $50,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a 
barracks complex for the 3nd Brigade at Fort 
Bragg, North Carolina). 
(5) $77,400,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a 
barracks complex for divisional artillery at Fort 
Bragg, North Carolina). 
(6) $13,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) for construction of a 
defense access road for Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION
OF
OUTSIDE
THE
UNITED 
STATES PROJECT.—The table in section 2101(b) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1698) 
is amended—
535 
HR 1815 RFS 
(1) in the item relating to Vilseck, Germany, by 
striking ‘‘$31,000,000’’ in the amount column and 
inserting ‘‘$26,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the 
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$226,900,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2104(b)(6) 
of that Act (117 Stat. 1700) is amended by striking 
‘‘$18,900,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$13,900,000’’. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 
project. 
Sec. 2206. Modifications of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2005 
projects. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table:
536 
HR 1815 RFS 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ............
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma .......................
$3,637,000 
California ........
Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms 
$24,000,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendelton ......
$1,400,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar ...................
$5,070,000 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ................
$90,437,000 
Naval Air Station, Lemoore ...............................
$8,480,000 
Naval Air Station, North Island ........................
$13,700,000 
Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake .............
$19,158,000 
Naval Postgraduate School ................................
$6,500,000 
Florida .............
Diving&Salvage Training Center, Panama City 
$9,678,000 
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville ..........................
$88,603,000 
Naval Air Station, Pensacola .............................
$8,710,000 
Naval Station, Mayport ......................................
$15,220,000 
Georgia ............
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay ....................
$6,890,000 
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany ................
$5,840,000 
Hawaii .............
Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay ...........
$5,700,000 
Naval Base, Pearl Harbor ..................................
$29,700,000 
Illinois .............
Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes .........
$167,750,000 
Maryland .........
Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River .......
$5,800,000 
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head ....
$13,460,000 
United States Naval Academy, Annapolis ..........
$51,720,000 
New Hampshire 
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard ...............................
$8,100,000 
North Carolina 
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point ............
$29,147,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, New River ................
$6,840,000 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ...................
$44,590,000 
Pennsylvania ...
Naval Station Weapons Center, Philadelphia ....
$4,780,000 
Rhode Island ...
Naval Station, Newport ......................................
$4,870,000 
Texas ...............
Naval Air Station, Kingsville .............................
$16,040,000 
Virginia ...........
Marine Corps Air Field, Quantico ......................
$19,698,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ............................
$4,270,000 
Naval Air Station, Oceana .................................
$11,680,000 
Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek ................
$36,034,000 
Naval Station, Norfolk .......................................
$111,033,000 
Washington .....
Naval Station, Everett .......................................
$70,950,000 
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor .........................
$60,160,000 
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ....................
$4,010,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installation outside the United States, and 
in the amount, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ................................
Naval Station, Guam ............................
$55,473,000
537 
HR 1815 RFS 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the 
Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family 
housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
facilities) at the installation, in the number of units, and 
in the amount set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Guam .......................
Commander Naval Region, Mari-
anas.
126 .....
$43,495,000 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), 
the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military 
family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
$178,644,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2005, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Navy in the total 
amount of $1,916,779,000, as follows:
538 
HR 1815 RFS 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United States authorized by section 2201(a), 
$802,311,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by section 2201(b), 
$25,584,000. 
(3) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $36,029,000. 
(4) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $218,942,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 
of title 10, United States Code), $588,660,000. 
(5) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
general purpose berthing pier at Naval Weapons 
Station, Earle, New Jersey, authorized by section 
2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 
108–136; 117 Stat. 1704), as amended by section 
2205 of this Act, $54,432,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 3 of pier 
11 replacement at Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia,
539 
HR 1815 RFS 
authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 
(division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 
1704), $40,200,000. 
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
apron and hangar at Naval Air Facility, El Centro, 
California, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2105), $18,666,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
White Side complex, Marine Corps Air Facility, 
Quantico, Virginia, authorized by section 2201(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 
118 Stat. 2105), $34,730,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
limited area production and storage complex at Stra-
tegic Weapons Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington, 
authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 
(division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2106), as amended by section 2206 of this Act, 
$47,095,000.
540 
HR 1815 RFS 
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
lab consolidation at Strategic Weapons Facility Pa-
cific, Bangor, Washington authorized by section 
2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 
108–375; 118 Stat. 2106), as amended by section 
2206 of this Act, $9,430,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
presidential helicopter programs support facility at 
Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, au-
thorized by section 2201(c) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2106), as 
amended by section 2206 of this Act, $40,700,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
(a). 
(2) $37,721,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a reclamation
541 
HR 1815 RFS 
and conveyance project for Camp Pendleton, Cali-
fornia). 
(3) $43,424,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a helicopter 
hangar replacement at Naval Air Station, Jackson-
ville, Florida). 
(4) $45,850,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for infrastructure up-
grades to Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes, 
Illinois). 
(5) $26,790,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for construction of a 
field house at United States Naval Academy, Annap-
olis, Maryland). 
(6) $31,059,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for replacement of 
Ship Repair Pier 3 at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Vir-
ginia). 
(7) $21,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for construction of 
bachelor quarters for Naval Station, Everett, Wash-
ington). 
(8) $29,889,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(b) for wharf upgrades 
at Naval Station, Guam).
542 
HR 1815 RFS 
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 
PROJECT.—The table in section 2201(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (di-
vision B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1703) is 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Naval Weapons Sta-
tion, Earle, New Jersey, by striking ‘‘$123,720,000’’ 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$140,372,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the 
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$1,352,524,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2204(b)(4) 
of that Act (117 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking 
‘‘$96,980,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$113,632,000’’. 
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATIONS OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECTS. 
(a) MODIFICATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2201(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (di-
vision B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105) is 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Marine Corps Air 
Facility, 
Quantico, 
Virginia, 
by 
striking
543 
HR 1815 RFS 
‘‘$73,838,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$74,462,000’’; 
(2) in the item relating to Strategic Weapons 
Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington, by striking 
‘‘$138,060,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$147,760,000’’; and 
(3) by striking the amount identified as the 
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$962,379,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2204(b) 
of that Act (118 Stat. 2107) is amended— 
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(4), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$34,098,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$34,722,000’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para-
graph (8) and, in such paragraph— 
(A) by striking ‘‘$65,982,000’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$66,614,000’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘at an unspecified loca-
tion’’ and inserting ‘‘at Naval Air Station, Pa-
tuxent River, Maryland’’; and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol-
lowing new paragraph (7): 
‘‘(7) $9,700,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for naval laboratory
544 
HR 1815 RFS 
consolidation, Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific, 
Bangor, Washington).’’. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ...................
Maxwell Air Force Base ............................
$14,900,000 
Alaska ......................
Clear Air Force Base .................................
$20,000,000 
Elmendorf Air Force Base .........................
$84,820,000 
Arizona ....................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .................
$8,600,000 
Luke Air Force Base .................................
$13,000,000 
Arkansas ..................
Little Rock Air Force Base .......................
$8,900,000 
California .................
Beale Air Force Base .................................
$14,200,000 
Edwards Air Force Base ...........................
$103,000,000 
Travis Air Force Base ...............................
$31,600,000 
Vandenberg Air Force Base ......................
$16,845,000 
Colorado ...................
Buckley Air Force Base .............................
$20,100,000 
Peterson Air Force Base ...........................
$25,500,000 
United States Air Force Academy .............
$13,000,000 
Delaware ..................
Dover Air Force Base ................................
$19,000,000 
District of Columbia 
Bolling Air Force Base ..............................
$14,900,000 
Florida .....................
Hurlburt Field ...........................................
$2,540,000 
MacDill Air Force Base .............................
$107,200,000 
Tyndall Air Force Base .............................
$21,500,000 
Georgia ....................
Robins Air Force Base ..............................
$7,600,000 
Hawaii ......................
Hickam Air Force Base .............................
$13,378,000 
Idaho ........................
Mountain Home Air Force Base ...............
$9,835,000 
Massachusetts ..........
Hanscom Air Force Base ..........................
$10,000,000 
Mississippi ...............
Keesler Air Force Base ..............................
$47,500,000