I 
118TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION H. R. 10074 
To direct the Comptroller General of the United States, in coordination 
with the National Academy of Sciences, to study alternatives for a 
nonpartisan congressional office or agency to project the net greenhouse 
gas emissions likely to be caused by Federal legislation, and for other 
purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 29, 2024 
Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. CASTEN, and Mr. 
HUFFMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on House Administration 
A BILL 
To direct the Comptroller General of the United States, 
in coordination with the National Academy of Sciences, 
to study alternatives for a nonpartisan congressional of-
fice or agency to project the net greenhouse gas emis-
sions likely to be caused by Federal legislation, and for 
other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carbon Cost Act of 
2024’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:27 Oct 30, 2024
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H10074.IH
H10074
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. STUDY OF ALTERNATIVES FOR A CONGRESSIONAL 
OFFICE TO PROJECT THE NET GREENHOUSE 
GAS EMISSIONS LIKELY TO BE CAUSED BY 
FEDERAL LEGISLATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 
of the United States, in coordination with the National 
Academy of Sciences, shall— 
(1) study alternatives for a nonpartisan con-
gressional office or agency— 
(A) to make thorough, science-based pro-
jections on whether the enactment, full funding, 
and implementation of particular Federal legis-
lation are likely to cause a net increase or de-
crease in global greenhouse gas emissions over 
a specified period; and 
(B) to quantify any such projected increase 
or decrease; and 
(2) submit a report to the Congress containing 
the results of such study, including recommenda-
tions. 
(b) CONSIDERATIONS.—The study under subsection 
(a) shall address each of the following: 
(1) Whether a new office or agency should be 
established for purposes of carrying out the func-
tions described in subsection (a)(1), or whether such 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:27 Oct 30, 2024
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H10074.IH
H10074
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
functions should be vested in one or more existing 
offices or agencies. 
(2) How to ensure the office or agency remains 
nonpartisan and science-focused. 
(3) How to involve governmental and private 
experts, including— 
(A) whether Federal officers and employ-
ees should be detailed to the office or agency 
carrying out the functions described in sub-
section (a)(1); and 
(B) how to involve appropriate experts in 
the analysis of projected greenhouse gas emis-
sions from each of the following: electric power 
generation; transportation; residential, commer-
cial, and industrial fuel use; natural gas and oil 
systems; coal mining and abandoned mines; ag-
riculture; industrial processes; land use, land 
use change, and forestry; and waste manage-
ment. 
(4) Lessons that can be learned from State leg-
islatures that have successfully implemented carbon 
scoring for legislative proposals. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
18:27 Oct 30, 2024
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H10074.IH
H10074
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS