H. R. 1540—204 
SEC. 819. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE 
WEAPON SYSTEMS ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2009. 
(a) REPEAL
OF CERTIFICATION
OF COMPLIANCE
OF CERTAIN 
MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS WITH ACTIONS ON TREAT-
MENT OF SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS BEFORE MILESTONE APPROVAL.—Sub-
section (c) of section 204 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 2366a 
note) is repealed. 
(b) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW PROGRAMS RECEIVING 
WAIVER
OF
CERTAIN
CERTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS.—Section 
2366b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The requirement in paragraph (2)(B) shall not apply to 
a program for which a certification was required pursuant to section 
2433a(c) of this title if the milestone decision authority— 
‘‘(A) determines in writing that— 
‘‘(i) the program has reached a stage in the acquisition 
process at which it would not be practicable to meet the 
certification component that was waived; and 
‘‘(ii) the milestone decision authority has taken appro-
priate alternative actions to address the underlying pur-
poses of such certification component; and 
‘‘(B) submits the written determination, and an explanation 
of the basis for the determination, to the congressional defense 
committees.’’. 
SEC. 820. INCLUSION OF CONTRACTOR SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS IN 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PLANNING DOCUMENTS. 
(a) ELEMENTS IN QDR REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Section 118(d) 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (4)— 
(A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(F) the roles and responsibilities that would be dis-
charged by contractors.’’; 
(2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘manpower and 
sustainment’’ and inserting ‘‘manpower, sustainment, and con-
tractor support’’; and 
(3) in paragraph (8), by inserting ‘‘, and the scope of con-
tractor support,’’ after ‘‘Defense Agencies’’. 
(b) CHAIRMAN
OF JOINT CHIEFS
OF STAFF ASSESSMENTS
OF 
CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF ARMED FORCES.— 
(1) ASSESSMENTS UNDER CONTINGENCY PLANNING.—Para-
graph (3) of subsection (a) of section 153 of such title is 
amended— 
(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and 
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following 
new subparagraph (C): 
‘‘(C) Identifying the support functions that are likely to 
require contractor performance under those contingency plans, 
and the risks associated with the assignment of such functions 
to contractors.’’.
H. R. 1540—205 
(2) ASSESSMENTS UNDER ADVICE ON REQUIREMENTS, PRO-
GRAMS, AND BUDGET.—Paragraph (4)(E) of such subsection is 
amended by inserting ‘‘and contractor support’’ after ‘‘area of 
manpower’’. 
(3) ASSESSMENTS FOR BIENNIAL REVIEW OF NATIONAL MILI-
TARY STRATEGY.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following 
new subparagraph: 
‘‘(I) Assessment of the requirements for contractor support 
of the armed forces in conducting peacetime training, peace-
keeping, overseas contingency operations, and major combat 
operations, and the risks associated with such support.’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘and the levels 
of support from allies and other friendly nations’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the levels of support from allies and other 
friendly nations, and the levels of contractor support’’. 
SEC. 821. AMENDMENT RELATING TO BUYING TENTS, TARPAULINS, 
OR COVERS FROM AMERICAN SOURCES. 
Section 2533a(b)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting ‘‘(and the structural components thereof)’’ 
after ‘‘tents’’. 
SEC. 822. REPEAL OF SUNSET OF AUTHORITY TO PROCURE FIRE 
RESISTANT RAYON FIBER FROM FOREIGN SOURCES FOR 
THE PRODUCTION OF UNIFORMS. 
Subsection (f) of section 829 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 229; 
10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is repealed. 
SEC. 823. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF POLITICAL INFORMATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2335. Prohibition on collection of political information 
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION
ON REQUIRING SUBMISSION
OF POLITICAL 
INFORMATION.—The head of an agency may not require a contractor 
to submit political information related to the contractor or a subcon-
tractor at any tier, or any partner, officer, director, or employee 
of the contractor or subcontractor— 
‘‘(1) as part of a solicitation, request for bid, request for 
proposal, or any other form of communication designed to solicit 
offers in connection with the award of a contract for procure-
ment of property or services; or 
‘‘(2) during the course of contract performance as part 
of the process associated with modifying a contract or exercising 
a contract option. 
‘‘(b) SCOPE.—The prohibition under this section applies to the 
procurement of commercial items, the procurement of commercial- 
off-the-shelf-items, and the non-commercial procurement of supplies, 
property, services, and manufactured items, irrespective of contract 
vehicle, including contracts, purchase orders, task or deliver orders 
under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, blanket pur-
chase agreements, and basic ordering agreements. 
‘‘(c) RULE
OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 
be construed as— 
‘‘(1) waiving, superseding, restricting, or limiting the 
application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2
H. R. 1540—206 
U.S.C. 431 et seq.) or preventing Federal regulatory or law 
enforcement agencies from collecting or receiving information 
authorized by law; or 
‘‘(2) precluding the Defense Contract Audit Agency from 
accessing and reviewing certain information, including political 
information, for the purpose of identifying unallowable costs 
and administering cost principles established pursuant to sec-
tion 2324 of this title. 
‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘contractor’ includes contrac-
tors, bidders, and offerors, and individuals and legal entities 
who would reasonably be expected to submit offers or bids 
for Federal Government contracts. 
‘‘(2) POLITICAL INFORMATION.—The term ‘political informa-
tion’ means information relating to political spending, including 
any payment consisting of a contribution, expenditure, inde-
pendent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering 
communication that is made by the contractor, any of its part-
ners, officers, directors or employees, or any of its affiliates 
or subsidiaries to a candidate or on behalf of a candidate 
for election for Federal office, to a political committee, to a 
political party, to a third party entity with the intention or 
reasonable expectation that it would use the payment to make 
independent expenditures or electioneering communications, or 
that is otherwise made with respect to any election for Federal 
office, party affiliation, and voting history. Each of the terms 
‘contribution’, ‘expenditure’, ‘independent expenditure’, ‘can-
didate’, ‘election’, ‘electioneering communication’, and ‘Federal 
office’ has the meaning given the term in the Federal Campaign 
Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 137 of such title is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 2334 the following new item: 
‘‘2335. Prohibition on collection of political information.’’. 
Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major 
Defense Acquisition Programs 
SEC. 831. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO NEW MILESTONE 
APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION 
PROGRAMS EXPERIENCING CRITICAL COST GROWTH DUE 
TO CHANGE IN QUANTITY PURCHASED. 
Section 2433a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3)(A) The requirements of subparagraphs (B) and (C) of para-
graph (1) shall not apply to a program or subprogram if— 
‘‘(i) the Milestone Decision Authority determines in writing, 
on the basis of a cost assessment and root cause analysis 
conducted pursuant to subsection (a), that— 
‘‘(I) but for a change in the quantity of items to be 
purchased under the program or subprogram, the program 
acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for the pro-
gram or subprogram would not have increased by a percent-
age equal to or greater than the cost growth thresholds
H. R. 1540—207 
for the program or subprogram set forth in subparagraph 
(B); and 
‘‘(II) the change in quantity of items described in sub-
clause (I) was not made as a result of an increase in 
program cost, a delay in the program, or a problem meeting 
program requirements; 
‘‘(ii) the Secretary determines in writing that the cost to 
the Department of Defense of complying with such require-
ments is likely to exceed the benefits to the Department of 
complying with such requirements; and 
‘‘(iii) the Secretary submits to Congress, before the end 
of the 60-day period beginning on the day the Selected Acquisi-
tion Report containing the information described in section 
2433(g) of this title is required to be submitted under section 
2432(f) of this title— 
‘‘(I) a copy of the written determination under clause 
(i) and an explanation of the basis for the determination; 
and 
‘‘(II) a copy of the written determination under clause 
(ii) and an explanation of the basis for the determination. 
‘‘(B) The cost growth thresholds specified in this subparagraph 
are as follows: 
‘‘(i) In the case of a major defense acquisition program 
or designated major defense subprogram, a percentage increase 
in the program acquisition unit cost for the program or subpro-
gram of— 
‘‘(I) 5 percent over the program acquisition unit cost 
for the program or subprogram as shown in the current 
Baseline Estimate for the program or subprogram; and 
‘‘(II) 10 percent over the program acquisition unit cost 
for the program or subprogram as shown in the original 
Baseline Estimate for the program or subprogram. 
‘‘(ii) In the case of a major defense acquisition program 
or designated major defense subprogram that is a procurement 
program, a percentage increase in the procurement unit cost 
for the program or subprogram of— 
‘‘(I) 5 percent over the procurement unit cost for the 
program or subprogram as shown in the current Baseline 
Estimate for the program or subprogram; and 
‘‘(II) 10 percent over the procurement unit cost for 
the program or subprogram as shown in the original Base-
line Estimate for the program or subprogram.’’. 
SEC. 832. ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT, AND CONTROL OF OPERATING 
AND SUPPORT COSTS FOR MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 
(a) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
issue guidance on actions to be taken to assess, manage, and 
control Department of Defense costs for the operation and support 
of major weapon systems. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall, 
at a minimum— 
(1) be issued in conjunction with the comprehensive guid-
ance on life-cycle management and the development and 
implementation of product support strategies for major weapon 
systems required by section 805 of the National Defenese
H. R. 1540—208 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 
123 Stat. 2403; 10 U.S.C. 2301 note); 
(2) require the military departments to retain each estimate 
of operating and support costs that is developed at any time 
during the life cycle of a major weapon system, together with 
supporting documentation used to develop the estimate; 
(3) require the military departments to update estimates 
of operating and support costs periodically throughout the life 
cycle of a major weapon system, to determine whether prelimi-
nary information and assumptions remain relevant and 
accurate, and identify and record reasons for variances; 
(4) establish standard requirements for the collection of 
data on operating and support costs for major weapon systems 
and require the military departments to revise their Visibility 
and Management of Operating and Support Costs (VAMOSC) 
systems to ensure that they collect complete and accurate data 
in compliance with such requirements and make such data 
available in a timely manner; 
(5) establish standard requirements for the collection and 
reporting of data on operating and support costs for major 
weapon systems by contractors performing weapon system 
sustainment functions in an appropriate format, and develop 
contract clauses to ensure that contractors comply with such 
requirements; 
(6) require the military departments— 
(A) to collect and retain data from operational and 
developmental testing and evaluation on the reliability and 
maintainability of major weapon systems; and 
(B) to use such data to inform system design decisions, 
provide insight into sustainment costs, and inform esti-
mates of operating and support costs for such systems; 
(7) require the military departments to ensure that 
sustainment factors are fully considered at key life cycle 
management decision points and that appropriate measures 
are taken to reduce operating and support costs by influencing 
system design early in development, developing sound 
sustainment strategies, and addressing key drivers of costs; 
(8) require the military departments to conduct an inde-
pendent logistics assessment of each major weapon system prior 
to key acquisition decision points (including milestone decisions) 
to identify features that are likely to drive future operating 
and support costs, changes to system design that could reduce 
such costs, and effective strategies for managing such costs; 
(9) include— 
(A) reliability metrics for major weapon systems; and 
(B) requirements on the use of metrics under subpara-
graph (A) as triggers— 
(i) to conduct further investigation and analysis 
into drivers of those metrics; and 
(ii) to develop strategies for improving reliability, 
availability, and maintainability of such systems at 
an affordable cost; and 
(10) require the military departments to conduct periodic 
reviews of operating and support costs of major weapon systems 
after such systems achieve initial operational capability to iden-
tify and address factors resulting in growth in operating and 
support costs and adapt support strategies to reduce such costs.
H. R. 1540—209 
(c) RETENTION OF DATA ON OPERATING AND SUPPORT COSTS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Director of Cost Assessment and 
Program Evaluation shall be responsible for developing and 
maintaining a database on operating and support estimates, 
supporting documentation, and actual operating and support 
costs for major weapon systems. 
(2) SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 
the Director, in carrying out such responsibility— 
(A) promptly receives the results of all cost estimates 
and cost analyses conducted by the military departments 
with regard to operating and support costs of major weapon 
systems; 
(B) has timely access to any records and data of the 
military departments (including classified and proprietary 
information) that the Director considers necessary to carry 
out such responsibility; and 
(C) with the concurrence of the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, may 
direct the military departments to collect and retain 
information necessary to support the database. 
(d) MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘major weapon system’’ has the meaning given that term in section 
2379(f) of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 833. CLARIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST ANALYSES 
AND TARGETS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PURPOSES. 
Section 2334(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as para-
graphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; 
(2) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘shall provide that—’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘cost estimates’’ and inserting ‘‘shall provide 
that cost estimates’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; and 
(C) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as paragraph 
(2) and moving such paragraph two ems to the left; 
(3) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (2) 
of this section, by striking ‘‘cost analyses and targets’’ and 
inserting ‘‘The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics shall, in consultation with the 
Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, develop 
policies, procedures, and guidance to ensure that cost analyses 
and targets’’; 
(4) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (1) 
of this section, by striking ‘‘issued by the Director of Cost 
Assessment and Program Evaluation’’ and inserting ‘‘issued 
by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics under paragraph (2)’’; and 
(5) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (1) 
of this section, by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘para-
graph (4)’’. 
SEC. 834. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GUIDANCE ON 
MANAGEMENT OF MANUFACTURING RISK IN MAJOR 
DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 
Section 812(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4264; 
10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended—
H. R. 1540—210 
(1) by striking ‘‘manufacturing readiness levels’’ each place 
it appears and inserting ‘‘manufacturing readiness levels or 
other manufacturing readiness standards’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
(5) and (6), respectively; and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new para-
graph (4): 
‘‘(4) provide for the tailoring of manufacturing readiness 
levels or other manufacturing readiness standards to address 
the unique characteristics of specific industry sectors or weapon 
system portfolios;’’. 
SEC. 835. MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION 
FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 
(a) CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER.—Section 820(a) of the John 
Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
(Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2330), as amended by section 805(c) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 110–181; 123 Stat. 2403), is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new para-
graph (6): 
‘‘(6) Chief developmental tester.’’. 
(b) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER AND 
LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.—Sec-
tion 139b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as sub-
sections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub-
section (c): 
‘‘(c) SUPPORT OF MDAPS BY CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER AND 
LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.— 
‘‘(1) SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall require that 
each major defense acquisition program be supported by— 
‘‘(A) a chief developmental tester; and 
‘‘(B) a governmental test agency, serving as lead 
developmental test and evaluation organization for the pro-
gram. 
‘‘(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER.— 
The chief developmental tester for a major defense acquisition 
program shall be responsible for— 
‘‘(A) coordinating the planning, management, and over-
sight of all developmental test and evaluation activities 
for the program; 
‘‘(B) maintaining insight into contractor activities 
under the program and overseeing the test and evaluation 
activities of other participating government activities under 
the program; and 
‘‘(C) helping program managers make technically 
informed, objective judgments about contractor develop-
mental test and evaluation results under the program. 
‘‘(3) RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND 
EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.—The lead developmental test and 
evaluation organization for a major defense acquisition program 
shall be responsible for—
H. R. 1540—211 
‘‘(A) providing technical expertise on testing and 
evaluation issues to the chief developmental tester for the 
program; 
‘‘(B) conducting developmental testing and evaluation 
activities for the program, as directed by the chief develop-
mental tester; and 
‘‘(C) assisting the chief developmental tester in pro-
viding oversight of contractors under the program and in 
reaching technically informed, objective judgments about 
contractor developmental test and evaluation results under 
the program.’’. 
SEC. 836. ASSESSMENT OF RISK ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT 
OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS TO BE PROCURED UNDER 
COOPERATIVE 
PROJECTS 
WITH 
FRIENDLY 
FOREIGN 
COUNTRIES. 
(a) ASSESSMENT OF RISK REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than two days after the Presi-
dent transmits a certification to Congress pursuant to section 
27(f) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2767(f)) 
regarding a proposed cooperative project agreement that is 
expected to result in the award of a Department of Defense 
contract for the engineering and manufacturing development 
of a major weapon system, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the Chairmen of the Committees on Armed Services of the 
Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth 
a risk assessment of the proposed cooperative project. 
(2) PREPARATION.—The Secretary shall prepare each report 
required by paragraph (1) in consultation with the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 
the 
Assistant 
Secretary 
of 
Defense 
for 
Research 
and 
Engineering, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
Evaluation of the Department of Defense. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The risk assessment on a cooperative project 
under subsection (a) shall include the following: 
(1) An assessment of the design, technical, manufacturing, 
and integration risks associated with developing and procuring 
the weapon system to be procured under the cooperative project. 
(2) A statement identifying any termination liability that 
would be incurred under the development contract to be entered 
into under subsection (a)(1), and a statement of the extent 
to which such termination liability would not be fully funded 
by appropriations available or sought in the fiscal year in 
which the agreement for the cooperative project is signed on 
behalf of the United States. 
(3) An assessment of the advisability of incurring any 
unfunded termination liability identified under paragraph (2) 
given the risks identified in the assessment under paragraph 
(1). 
(4) A listing of which, if any, requirements associated with 
the oversight and management of a major defense acquisition 
program (as prescribed under Department of Defense Instruc-
tion 5000.02 or related authorities) will be waived, or in any 
way modified, in carrying out the development contract to be 
entered into under (a)(1), and a full explanation why such 
requirements need to be waived or modified. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
H. R. 1540—212 
(1) The term ‘‘engineering and manufacturing development’’ 
has the meaning given that term in Department of Defense 
Instruction 5000.02. 
(2) The term ‘‘major weapon system’’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 2379(f) of title 10, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 837. COMPETITION IN MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT OF SUB-
SYSTEMS OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 
Section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act 
of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1721; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) 
is amended— 
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘OPERATION AND 
SUSTAINMENT
OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS’’ and inserting 
‘‘MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 
AND SUBSYSTEMS’’; 
(2) by inserting ‘‘or subsystem of a major weapon system’’ 
after ‘‘a major weapon system’’; and 
(3) by inserting ‘‘, or for components needed for such 
maintenance and sustainment,’’ after ‘‘such maintenance and 
sustainment’’. 
SEC. 838. OVERSIGHT OF AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WITH 
RESPECT TO EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 
PROGRAM. 
The Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) redesignate the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 
program as a major defense acquisition program not in the 
sustainment phase under section 2430 of title 10, United States 
Code; or 
(2) require the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle pro-
gram— 
(A) to provide to the congressional defense committees 
all information with respect to the cost, schedule, and 
performance of the program that would be required to 
be provided under sections 2431 (relating to weapons 
development and procurement schedules), 2432 (relating 
to Select Acquisition Reports, including updated program 
life-cycle cost estimates), and 2433 (relating to unit cost 
reports) of title 10, United States Code, with respect to 
the program if the program were designated as a major 
defense acquisition program not in the sustainment phase; 
and 
(B) to provide to the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics— 
(i) a quarterly cost and status report, commonly 
known as a Defense Acquisition Executive Summary, 
which serves as an early-warning of actual and poten-
tial problems with a program and provides for possible 
mitigation plans; and 
(ii) earned value management data that contains 
measurements of contractor technical, schedule, and 
cost performance.
H. R. 1540—213 
SEC. 
839. 
IMPLEMENTATION 
OF 
ACQUISITION 
STRATEGY 
FOR 
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2012, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional committees specified 
in subsection (c) the following information: 
(1) A description of how the strategy of the Department 
of Defense to acquire space launch capability under the Evolved 
Expendable Launch Vehicle program implements each of the 
recommendations included in the Report of the Government 
Accountability Office on the Evolved Expendable Launch 
Vehicle, dated September 15, 2011 (GAO–11–641). 
(2) With respect to any such recommendation that the 
Department does not implement, an explanation of how the 
Department is otherwise addressing the deficiencies identified 
in that report. 
(b) ASSESSMENT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED 
STATES.—Not later than 60 days after the submission of the 
information required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General 
of the United States shall submit to the congressional committees 
specified in subsection (c) an assessment of that information and 
any additional findings or recommendations the Comptroller Gen-
eral considers appropriate. 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congressional commit-
tees specified in this subsection are the following: 
(1) The Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives. 
(2) The Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives. 
(3) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate 
and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
House of Representatives. 
Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Con-
tracts in Support of Contingency Oper-
ations in Iraq or Afghanistan 
SEC. 841. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY IN THE 
UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND THEATER OF OPER-
ATIONS. 
(a) PROHIBITION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 
Acquisition Regulation to authorize the head of a contracting 
activity, pursuant to a request from the Commander of the 
United States Central Command under subsection (c)(2)— 
(A) to restrict the award of Department of Defense 
contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements that the head 
of the contracting activity determines in writing would 
provide funding directly or indirectly to a person or entity 
that has been identified by the Commander of the United 
States Central Command as actively supporting an insur-
gency or otherwise actively opposing United States or coali-
tion forces in a contingency operation in the United States 
Central Command theater of operations;
H. R. 1540—214 
(B) to terminate for default any Department contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determina-
tion by the head of the contracting activity that the con-
tractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agree-
ment, has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that 
none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or 
cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly 
to a person or entity who is actively supporting an insur-
gency or otherwise actively opposing United States or coali-
tion forces in a contingency operation in the United States 
Central Command theater of operations; or 
(C) to void in whole or in part any Department contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determina-
tion by the head of the contracting activity that the con-
tract, grant, or cooperative agreement provides funding 
directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been 
identified by the Commander of the United States Central 
Command as actively supporting an insurgency or other-
wise actively opposing United States or coalition forces 
in a contingency operation in the United States Central 
Command theater of operations. 
(2) TREATMENT AS VOID.—For purposes of this section: 
(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that 
is void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy. 
(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that 
is void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy 
with regard to a segregable task or effort under the con-
tract, grant, or cooperative agreement. 
(b) CONTRACT CLAUSE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the 
Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation to require that— 
(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be 
included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 
agreement of the Department that is awarded on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act; and 
(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered 
contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Depart-
ment that is awarded before the date of the enactment 
of this Act shall be modified to include the clause described 
in paragraph (2). 
(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this para-
graph is a clause that— 
(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the 
grant or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence 
to ensure that none of the funds received under the con-
tract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly 
or indirectly to a person or entity who is actively supporting 
an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United States 
or coalition forces in a contingency operation; and 
(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant 
or cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head 
of the contracting activity to terminate or void the contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part, as 
provided in subsection (a).
H. R. 1540—215 
(3) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREE-
MENT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered contract, grant, 
or cooperative agreement’’ means a contract, grant, or coopera-
tive agreement with an estimated value in excess of $100,000 
that will be performed in the United States Central Command 
theater of operations. 
(c) IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTS WITH SUPPORTERS OF THE 
ENEMY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through 
the Commander of the United States Central Command, shall 
establish a program to use available intelligence to review 
persons and entities who receive United States funds through 
contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements performed in 
the United States Central Command theater of operations and 
identify any such persons and entities who are actively sup-
porting an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United 
States or coalition forces in a contingency operation. 
(2) NOTICE TO CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES.—If the Commander 
of the United States Central Command, acting pursuant to 
the program required by paragraph (1), identifies a person 
or entity as actively supporting an insurgency or otherwise 
actively opposing United States or coalition forces in a contin-
gency operation, the Commander may notify the head of a 
contracting activity in writing of such identification and request 
that the head of the contracting activity exercise the authority 
provided in subsection (a) with regard to any contracts, grants, 
or cooperative agreements that provide funding directly or 
indirectly to the person or entity. 
(3) PROTECTION
OF
CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION.—Classified 
information relied upon by the Commander of the United States 
Central Command to make an identification in accordance with 
this subsection may not be disclosed to a contractor or a 
recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect 
to which an action is taken pursuant to the authority provided 
in subsection (a), or to their representatives, in the absence 
of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction 
established under Article III of the Constitution of the United 
States that specifically addresses the conditions upon which 
such classified information may be so disclosed. 
(d) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES.— 
(1) CONTRACT ACTIONS.—The authority provided by sub-
section (a) to restrict, terminate, or void contracts, grants, 
and cooperative agreements may not be delegated below the 
level of the head of a contracting activity. 
(2) IDENTIFICATION OF SUPPORT OF ENEMY.—The authority 
to make an identification under subsection (c)(1) may not be 
delegated below the level of the Commander of the United 
States Central Command. 
(e) REPORTS.—Not later than March 1 of each of 2013, 2014, 
and 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the use of the authority provided by this 
section in the preceding calendar year. Each report shall identify, 
for the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in 
which the Department of Defense exercised the authority to restrict, 
terminate, or void contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements 
pursuant to subsection (a) and explain the basis for the action
H. R. 1540—216 
taken. Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classi-
fied form. 
(f) OTHER DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘contingency 
operation’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(g) SUNSET.—The authority to restrict, terminate, or void con-
tracts, grants, and cooperative agreements pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall cease to be effective on the date that is three years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 842. ADDITIONAL ACCESS TO CONTRACTOR AND SUBCON-
TRACTOR RECORDS IN THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL 
COMMAND THEATER OF OPERATIONS. 
(a) DEPARTMENT
OF
DEFENSE
CONTRACTS, GRANTS, 
AND 
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 
Acquisition Regulation to require that— 
(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be 
included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 
agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and 
(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered 
contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Depart-
ment that is awarded before the date of the enactment 
of this Act shall be modified to include the clause described 
in paragraph (2). 
(2) CLAUSE.—The clause described in this paragraph is 
a clause authorizing the Secretary, upon a written determina-
tion pursuant to paragraph (3), to examine any records of 
the contractor, the recipient of a grant or cooperative agree-
ment, or any subcontractor or subgrantee under such contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement to the extent necessary to 
ensure that funds available under the contract, grant, or 
cooperative agreement— 
(A) are not subject to extortion or corruption; and 
(B) are not provided directly or indirectly to persons 
or entities that are actively supporting an insurgency or 
otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition forces 
in a contingency operation. 
(3) WRITTEN DETERMINATION.—The authority to examine 
records pursuant to the contract clause described in paragraph 
(2) may be exercised only upon a written determination by 
the contracting officer or comparable official responsible for 
a grant or cooperative agreement, upon a finding by the Com-
mander of the United States Central Command, that there 
is reason to believe that funds available under the contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement concerned may have been sub-
ject to extortion or corruption or may have been provided 
directly or indirectly to persons or entities that are actively 
supporting an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United 
States or coalition forces in a contingency operation. 
(4) FLOWDOWN.—A clause described in paragraph (2) shall 
also be required in any subcontract or subgrant under a covered 
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement if the subcontract 
or subgrant has an estimated value in excess of $100,000.
H. R. 1540—217 
(b) REPORTS.—Not later than March 1 of each of 2013, 2014, 
and 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the use of the authority provided by this 
section in the preceding calendar year. Each report shall identify, 
for the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in 
which the Department of Defense exercised the authority provided 
under this section to examine records, explain the basis for the 
action taken, and summarize the results of any examination of 
records so undertaken, Any report under this subsection may be 
submitted in classified form. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘contingency operation’’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code. 
(2) The term ‘‘covered contract, grant, or cooperative agree-
ment’’ means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with 
an estimated value in excess of $100,000 that will be performed 
in the United States Central Command theater of operations 
in support of a contingency operation. 
(d) SUNSET.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The clause described by subsection (a)(2) 
shall not be required in any contract, grant, or cooperative 
agreement that is awarded after the date that is three years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) CONTINUING
EFFECT
OF
CLAUSES
INCLUDED
BEFORE 
SUNSET.—Any clause described by subsection (a)(2) that is 
included in a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement pursu-
ant to this section before the date specified in paragraph (1) 
shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms. 
SEC. 843. REACH-BACK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION 
ENDURING FREEDOM AND OPERATION NEW DAWN. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE LEAD CONTRACTING ACTIVITY.— 
The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 
Logistics may designate a single contracting activity inside the 
United States to act as the lead contracting activity with authority 
for use of domestic capabilities in support of overseas contracting 
for Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation New Dawn. The 
contracting activity so designated shall be known as the ‘‘lead 
reach-back contracting authority’’ for such operations. 
(b) LIMITED AUTHORITY
FOR USE
OF OUTSIDE-THE-UNITED- 
STATES-THRESHOLDS.—The head of the contracting authority des-
ignated pursuant to subsection (a) may, when awarding a contract 
inside the United States for performance in the theater of operations 
for Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation New Dawn, use 
the overseas increased micro-purchase threshold and the overseas 
increased simplified acquisition threshold in the same manner and 
to the same extent as if the contract were to be awarded and 
performed outside the United States. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘overseas increased micro-purchase threshold’’ 
means the amount specified in paragraph (1)(B) of section 
1903(b) of title 41, United States Code. 
(2) The term ‘‘overseas increased simplified acquisition 
threshold’’ means the amount specified in paragraph (2)(B) 
of section 1903(b) of title 41, United States Code.
H. R. 1540—218 
SEC. 844. COMPETITION AND REVIEW OF CONTRACTS FOR PROPERTY 
OR SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF A CONTINGENCY OPER-
ATION. 
(a) CONTRACTING GOALS.—Not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) establish goals for competition in contracts awarded 
by the Secretary of Defense for the procurement of property 
or services to be used outside the United States in support 
of a contingency operation; and 
(2) develop processes by which to measure and monitor 
such competition, including in task-order categories for services, 
construction, and supplies. 
(b) ANNUAL REVIEW OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS.—For each year 
the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program contract, or other similar 
omnibus contract awarded by the Secretary of Defense for the 
procurement of property or services to be used outside the United 
States in support of a contingency operation, is in force, the Sec-
retary shall require a competition advocate of the Department of 
Defense to conduct an annual review of each such contract. 
(c) ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTRACTING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANI-
STAN.— Section 863(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is 
amended— 
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) through (H) as sub-
paragraphs (G) through (I), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(F) Percentage of contracts awarded on a competitive 
basis as compared to established goals for competition in 
contingency contracting actions.’’. 
SEC. 845. INCLUSION OF ASSOCIATED SUPPORT SERVICES IN RAPID 
ACQUISITION AND DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURES FOR SUP-
PLIES. 
(a) INCLUSION.—Section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is 
amended by striking ‘‘supplies’’ each place it appears (other than 
subsections (a)(1)(B) and (f)) and inserting ‘‘supplies and associated 
support services’’. 
(b) DEFINITION.—Such section is further amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(g) ASSOCIATED SUPPORT SERVICES DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘associated support services’ means training, operation, 
maintenance, and support services needed in connection with the 
deployment of supplies to be acquired pursuant to the authority 
of this section. The term does not include functions that are inher-
ently governmental or otherwise exempted from private sector 
performance.’’. 
(c) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY.—The authority 
to acquire associated support services pursuant to section 806 of 
the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003, as amended by this section, shall not take effect until the 
Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense commit-
tees that the Secretary has developed and implemented an expe-
dited review process in compliance with the requirements of section 
804 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
H. R. 1540—219 
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4256; 10 U.S.C. 
2302 note). 
SEC. 846. JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND TO RAPIDLY 
MEET URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 131 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2216 the following 
new section: 
‘‘§ 2216a. Rapidly meeting urgent needs: Joint Urgent Oper-
ational Needs Fund 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the Treasury an 
account to be known as the ‘Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund’ 
(in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’). 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The Fund shall consist of the following: 
‘‘(1) Amounts appropriated to the Fund. 
‘‘(2) Amounts transferred to the Fund. 
‘‘(3) Any other amounts made available to the Fund by 
law. 
‘‘(c) USE OF FUNDS.—(1) Amounts in the Fund shall be available 
to the Secretary of Defense for capabilities that are determined 
by the Secretary, pursuant to the review process required by section 
804(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note), to be suitable for rapid 
fielding in response to urgent operational needs. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary shall establish a merit-based process for 
identifying equipment, supplies, services, training, and facilities 
suitable for funding through the Fund. 
‘‘(3) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require 
or enable any official of the Department of Defense to provide 
funding under this section pursuant to a congressional earmark, 
as defined in clause 9 of Rule XXI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives, or a congressionally directed spending item, 
as defined in paragraph 5 of Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules 
of the Senate. 
‘‘(d) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—(1) Amounts in the Fund may be 
transferred by the Secretary of Defense from the Fund to any 
of the following accounts of the Department of Defense to accomplish 
the purpose stated in subsection (c): 
‘‘(A) Operation and maintenance accounts. 
‘‘(B) Procurement accounts. 
‘‘(C) Research, development, test, and evaluation accounts. 
‘‘(2) Upon determination by the Secretary that all or part of 
the amounts transferred from the Fund under paragraph (1) are 
not necessary for the purpose for which transferred, such amounts 
may be transferred back to the Fund. 
‘‘(3) The transfer of an amount to an account under the 
authority in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to increase the amount 
authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount 
so transferred. 
‘‘(4) The transfer authority provided by paragraphs (1) and 
(2) is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the 
Department of Defense by law. 
‘‘(e) SUNSET.—The authority to make expenditures or transfers 
from the Fund shall expire on the last day of the third fiscal
H. R. 1540—220 
year that begins after the date of the enactment of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 2216 the following new item: 
‘‘2216a. Rapidly meeting urgent needs: Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON COMMENCEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FROM 
FUND.—No expenditure may be made from the Joint Urgent Oper-
ational Needs Fund established by section 2216a of title 10, United 
States Code (as added by subsection (a)), until the Secretary of 
Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the 
Secretary has developed and implemented an expedited review 
process in compliance with the requirements of section 804 of the 
Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4256; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). 
Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base 
Matters 
SEC. 851. ASSESSMENT OF THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE PILOT 
PROGRAM. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 
report on the defense industrial base pilot program of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include each of the following: 
(1) A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effective-
ness of the defense industrial base pilot program. 
(2) An assessment of the legal, policy, or regulatory chal-
lenges associated with effectively executing the pilot program. 
(3) Recommendations for changes to the legal, policy, or 
regulatory framework for the pilot program to make it more 
effective. 
(4) A description of any plans to expand the pilot program, 
including to other sectors beyond the defense industrial base. 
(5) An assessment of the potential legal, policy, or regu-
latory challenges associated with expanding the pilot program. 
(6) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 
(c) FORM.—The report required under this section shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 852. STRATEGY FOR SECURING THE DEFENSE SUPPLY CHAIN 
AND INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
that the annual report to Congress on the defense industrial base 
submitted for fiscal year 2012 pursuant to section 2504 of title 
10, United States Code, includes a description of, and a status 
report on, the sector-by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment of the indus-
trial base undertaken by the Department of Defense. 
(b) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 
(a) shall include, at a minimum, a description of the steps taken 
and planned to be taken—
H. R. 1540—221 
(1) to identify current and emerging sectors of the defense 
industrial base that are critical to the national security of 
the United States; 
(2) in each sector, to identify items that are critical to 
military readiness, including key components, subcomponents, 
and materials; 
(3) to examine the structure of the industrial base, 
including the competitive landscape, relationships, risks, and 
opportunities within that structure; 
(4) to map the supply chain for critical items identified 
under paragraph (2) in a manner that provides the Department 
of Defense visibility from raw material to final products; 
(5) to perform a risk assessment of the supply chain for 
such critical items and conduct an evaluation of the extent 
to which— 
(A) the supply chain for such items is subject to disrup-
tion by factors outside the control of the Department of 
Defense; and 
(B) such disruption would adversely affect the ability 
of the Department of Defense to fill its national security 
mission. 
(c) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Based on the findings from the sector- 
by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment, as described in the report 
required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop 
a defense supply chain and industrial base strategy to ensure 
the continued availability of items that are determined by the 
Secretary to be critical to military readiness and to be subject 
to significant supply chain risk. The strategy shall be based on 
a prioritized assessment of risks and challenges to the defense 
supply chain and industrial base and shall, at a minimum, 
address— 
(1) mitigation strategies needed to address any gaps or 
vulnerabilities in the relevant sectors of the defense industrial 
base; 
(2) the need for timely mobilization and capacity in such 
sectors of the defense industrial base; and 
(3) any other steps needed to foster and safeguard such 
sectors of the defense industrial base. 
(d) FOLLOW-UP REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
that the annual report to Congress on the defense industrial base 
submitted for each of fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 includes 
an update on the steps taken by the Department of Defense to 
act on the findings of the sector-by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment 
of the industrial base and implement the strategy required by 
subsection (c). Such updates shall, at a minimum— 
(1) be conducted based on current mapping of the supply 
chain and industrial base structure, including an analysis of 
the competitive landscape, relationships, risks, and opportuni-
ties within that structure; and 
(2) take into account any changes or updates to the 
National Defense Strategy, National Military Strategy, national 
counterterrorism 
policy, 
homeland 
security 
policy, 
and 
applicable operational or contingency plans.
H. R. 1540—222 
SEC. 853. ASSESSMENT OF FEASABILITY AND ADVISABILITY OF 
ESTABLISHMENT OF RARE EARTH MATERIAL INVENTORY. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Defense 
Logistics Agency Strategic Materials shall submit to the Secretary 
of Defense an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of 
establishing an inventory of rare earth materials necessary to 
ensure the long-term availability of such rare earth materials. The 
assessment shall— 
(1) identify and describe the steps necessary to create an 
inventory of rare earth materials, including oxides, metals, 
alloys, and magnets, to support national defense requirements 
and ensure reliable sources of such materials for defense pur-
poses; 
(2) provide a detailed cost-benefit analysis of creating such 
an inventory in accordance with Office of Management and 
Budget Circular A–94; 
(3) provide an analysis of the potential market effects, 
including effects on the pricing and commercial availability 
of such rare earth materials, associated with creating such 
an inventory; 
(4) identify and describe the mechanisms available to the 
Administrator to make such an inventory accessible, including 
by purchase, to entities requiring such rare earth materials 
to support national defense requirements, including producers 
of end items containing rare earth materials; 
(5) provide a detailed explanation of the ability of the 
Administrator to authorize the sale of excess materials to sup-
port a Rare Earth Material Stockpile Inventory Program; 
(6) analyze any potential requirements to amend or revise 
the Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials Annual Mate-
rial Plan for Fiscal Year 2012 and subsequent years to reflect 
an inventory of rare earth materials to support national defense 
requirements; 
(7) identify and describe the steps necessary to develop 
or maintain a competitive, multi-source supply-chain to avoid 
reliance on a single source of supply; 
(8) identify and describe supply sources considered by the 
Administrator to be reliable, including an analysis of the 
capabilities of such sources to produce such materials in forms 
required for military applications in the next five years, as 
well as the security of upstream supply for these sources of 
material; and 
(9) include such other considerations and recommendations 
as necessary to support the establishment of such inventory. 
(b) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
on which the assessment is submitted under subsection (a), 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees— 
(A) the findings and recommendations from the assess-
ment required under subsection (a); 
(B) a description of any actions the Secretary intends 
to take regarding the plans, strategies, policies, regulations, 
or resourcing of the Department of Defense as a result 
of the findings and recommendations from such assessment; 
and
H. R. 1540—223 
(C) any recommendations for legislative or regulatory 
changes needed to ensure the long-term availability of such 
rare earth materials. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘rare earth’’ means any of the following chem-
ical elements in any of their physical forms or chemical com-
binations and alloys: 
(A) Scandium. 
(B) Yttrium. 
(C) Lanthanum. 
(D) Cerium. 
(E) Praseodymium. 
(F) Neodymium. 
(G) Promethium. 
(H) Samarium. 
(I) Europium. 
(J) Gadolinium. 
(K) Terbium. 
(L) Dysprosium. 
(M) Holmium. 
(N) Erbium. 
(O) Thulium. 
(P) Ytterbium. 
(Q) Lutetium. 
(2) The term ‘‘capability’’ means the required facilities, 
manpower, technological knowledge, and intellectual property 
necessary for the efficient and effective production of rare earth 
materials. 
SEC. 854. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRIAL 
BASE FOR NIGHT VISION IMAGE INTENSIFICATION SEN-
SORS. 
(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall undertake an assess-
ment of the current and long-term availability within the United 
States and international industrial base of critical equipment, 
components, subcomponents, and materials (including, but not lim-
ited to, lenses, tubes, and electronics) needed to support current 
and future United States military requirements for night vision 
image intensification sensors. In carrying out the assessment, the 
Secretary shall— 
(1) identify items in connection with night vision image 
intensification sensors that the Secretary determines are crit-
ical to military readiness, including key components, subcompo-
nents, and materials; 
(2) describe and perform a risk assessment of the supply 
chain for items identified under paragraph (1) and evaluate 
the extent to which— 
(A) the supply chain for such items could be disrupted 
by a loss of industrial capability in the United States; 
and 
(B) the industrial base obtains such items from foreign 
sources; 
(3) describe and assess current and future investment, 
gaps, and vulnerabilities in the ability of the Department to 
respond to the potential loss of domestic or international sources 
that provide items identified under paragraph (1); and
H. R. 1540—224 
(4) identify and assess current strategies to leverage 
innovative night vision image intensification technologies being 
pursued in both Department of Defense laboratories and the 
private sector for the next generation of night vision capabili-
ties, including an assessment of the competitiveness and techno-
logical advantages of the United States night vision image 
intensification industrial base. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
Congress a report containing the results of the assessment required 
under subsection (a). 
SEC. 855. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO RESPONSIBILITIES 
OF DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR 
MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL BASE POLICY. 
Section 139e(b)(12) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘titles I and II’’ and inserting ‘‘titles I and III’’. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 861. CLARIFICATION OF JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES 
DISTRICT COURTS TO HEAR BID PROTEST DISPUTES 
INVOLVING MARITIME CONTRACTS. 
(a) EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION.—Section 1491(b) of title 28, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(6) Jurisdiction over any action described in paragraph 
(1) arising out of a maritime contract, or a solicitation for 
a proposed maritime contract, shall be governed by this section 
and shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of the district courts 
of the United States under the Suits in Admiralty Act (chapter 
309 of title 46) or the Public Vessels Act (chapter 311 of title 
46).’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall apply to any cause of action filed on or after the first day 
of the first month beginning more than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 862. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, 
ENGINEERING, AND MATH (STEM) PROGRAMS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion, Technology, and Logistics shall develop programs and incen-
tives to ensure that Department of Defense contractors take appro-
priate steps to— 
(1) enhance undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral pro-
grams in science, technology, engineering and math (in this 
section referred to as ‘‘STEM’’ disciplines); 
(2) make investments, such as programming and cur-
riculum development, in STEM programs within elementary 
and secondary schools; 
(3) encourage employees to volunteer in Title I schools 
in order to enhance STEM education and programs; 
(4) make personnel available to advise and assist faculty 
at such colleges and universities in the performance of STEM 
research and disciplines critical to the functions of the Depart-
ment of Defense;
H. R. 1540—225 
(5) establish partnerships between the offeror and histori-
cally Black colleges and universities and minority institutions 
for the purpose of training students in scientific disciplines; 
(6) award scholarships and fellowships, and establish 
cooperative work-education programs in scientific disciplines; 
or 
(7) conduct recruitment activities at historically black col-
leges and universities and other minority-serving institutions 
or offer internships or apprenticeships. 
(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 270 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the steps taken 
to implement the requirements of this section. 
SEC. 863. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON AUTHORITIES AVAIL-
ABLE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR MULTIYEAR 
CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) The procurement of alternative fuels by the Department 
of Defense through the use of long-term contracts can provide 
stability for industry, which could attract investment needed 
to develop alternative fuel sources. 
(2) In appropriate circumstances, and with appropriate 
protections, the use of long-term contracts for alternative fuels 
can be in the best interest of the Department if the costs 
of these contracts are competitive with other fuel contracts. 
(3) The Department has asked for the authority to enter 
into long-term contracts for alternative fuels. 
(b) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Department of Defense should continue to pursue long-term 
contracting authority for alternative fuels, as well as traditional 
fuels, if the contracts will satisfy military requirements and result 
in equal or less cost to the Department over their duration. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on the authorities 
currently available to the Department of Defense for multiyear 
contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels, including advanced 
biofuels. The report shall include a description of such additional 
authorities, if any, as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
authorize the Department to enter into contracts for the purchase 
of alternative fuels, including advanced biofuels, of sufficient length 
to reduce the impact to the Department of future price or supply 
shocks in the petroleum market, to benefit taxpayers, and to reduce 
United States dependence on foreign oil. 
SEC. 864. ACQUISITION WORKFORCE IMPROVEMENTS. 
(a) WORKFORCE IMPROVEMENTS.—Section 1704(b) of title 41, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting after the first sentence the following: ‘‘The 
Associate Administrator shall be chosen on the basis of dem-
onstrated knowledge and expertise in acquisition, human cap-
ital, and management.’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘The Associate Administrator for Acquisition 
Workforce Programs shall be located in the Federal Acquisition 
Institute (or its successor).’’ and inserting ‘‘The Associate 
Administrator shall be located in the Office of Federal Procure-
ment Policy.’’;
H. R. 1540—226 
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting 
a semicolon; 
(4) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and 
(5) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(5) implementing workforce programs under subsections 
(f) through (l) of section 1703 of this title; and’’. 
(b) FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Division B of subtitle I of title 41, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 11 the 
following new chapter: 
‘‘CHAPTER 12—FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE 
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘1201. Federal Acquisition Institute. 
‘‘§ 1201. Federal Acquisition Institute 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a Federal Acquisition 
Institute (FAI) in order to— 
‘‘(1) foster and promote the development of a professional 
acquisition workforce Government-wide; 
‘‘(2) promote and coordinate Government-wide research and 
studies to improve the procurement process and the laws, poli-
cies, methods, regulations, procedures, and forms relating to 
acquisition by the executive agencies; 
‘‘(3) collect data and analyze acquisition workforce data 
from the Office of Personnel Management, the heads of execu-
tive agencies, and, through periodic surveys, from individual 
employees; 
‘‘(4) periodically analyze acquisition career fields to identify 
critical competencies, duties, tasks, and related academic pre-
requisites, skills, and knowledge; 
‘‘(5) coordinate and assist agencies in identifying and 
recruiting highly qualified candidates for acquisition fields; 
‘‘(6) develop instructional materials for acquisition per-
sonnel in coordination with private and public acquisition col-
leges and training facilities; 
‘‘(7) evaluate the effectiveness of training and career 
development programs for acquisition personnel; 
‘‘(8) promote the establishment and utilization of academic 
programs by colleges and universities in acquisition fields; 
‘‘(9) facilitate, to the extent requested by agencies, inter-
agency intern and training programs; 
‘‘(10) collaborate with other civilian agency acquisition 
training programs to leverage training supporting all members 
of the civilian agency acquisition workforce; 
‘‘(11) assist civilian agencies with their acquisition and 
capital planning efforts; and 
‘‘(12) perform other career management or research func-
tions as directed by the Administrator. 
‘‘(b) BUDGET RESOURCES AND AUTHORITY.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall recommend to 
the Administrator of General Services sufficient budget 
resources and authority for the Federal Acquisition Institute
H. R. 1540—227 
to support Government-wide training standards and certifi-
cation requirements necessary to enhance the mobility and 
career opportunities of the Federal acquisition workforce. 
‘‘(2) ACQUISITION WORKFORCE TRAINING FUND.—Subject to 
the availability of funds, the Administrator of General Services 
shall provide the Federal Acquisition Institute with amounts 
from the acquisition workforce training fund established under 
section 1703(i) of this title sufficient to meet the annual budget 
for the Federal Acquisition Institute requested by the Adminis-
trator under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(c) FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.— 
‘‘(1) REPORTING TO ADMINISTRATOR.—The Federal Acquisi-
tion Institute shall report through its Board of Directors directly 
to the Administrator. 
‘‘(2) COMPOSITION.—The Board shall be composed of not 
more than 8 individuals from the Federal Government rep-
resenting a mix of acquisition functional areas, all of whom 
shall be appointed by the Administrator. 
‘‘(3) DUTIES.—The Board shall provide general direction 
to the Federal Acquisition Institute to ensure that the 
Institute— 
‘‘(A) meets its statutory requirements; 
‘‘(B) meets the needs of the Federal acquisition 
workforce; 
‘‘(C) implements appropriate programs; 
‘‘(D) coordinates with appropriate organizations and 
groups that have an impact on the Federal acquisition 
workforce; 
‘‘(E) develops and implements plans to meet future 
challenges of the Federal acquisition workforce; and 
‘‘(F) works closely with the Defense Acquisition Univer-
sity. 
‘‘(4) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The Board shall make rec-
ommendations to the Administrator regarding the development 
and execution of the annual budget of the Federal Acquisition 
Institute. 
‘‘(d) DIRECTOR.—The Director of the Federal Acquisition 
Institute shall be appointed by, be subject to the direction and 
control of, and report directly to the Administrator. 
‘‘(e) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Administrator shall submit to the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and 
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee 
on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Appro-
priations of the House of Representatives an annual report on 
the projected budget needs and expense plans of the Federal 
Acquisition Institute to fulfill its mandate.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents at the 
beginning of subtitle I of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to chapter 11 the following new item: 
‘‘12. Federal Acquisition Institute ..................................................................1201.’’. 
(3) CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (5) of section 
1122(a) of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(5) providing for and directing the activities of the Federal 
Acquisition Institute established under section 1201 of this 
title, including recommending to the Administrator of General 
Services a sufficient budget for such activities.’’.
H. R. 1540—228 
(c) GOVERNMENT-WIDE
TRAINING
STANDARDS
AND
CERTIFI-
CATION.—Section 1703 of such title is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘The Administrator shall’’ and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) GOVERNMENT-WIDE TRAINING STANDARDS AND CER-
TIFICATION.—The Administrator, acting through the Fed-
eral Acquisition Institute, shall provide and update govern-
ment-wide training standards and certification require-
ments, including— 
‘‘(i) developing and modifying acquisition certifi-
cation programs; 
‘‘(ii) 
ensuring 
quality 
assurance 
for 
agency 
implementation of government-wide training and cer-
tification standards; 
‘‘(iii) analyzing the acquisition training curriculum 
to ascertain if all certification competencies are covered 
or if adjustments are necessary; 
‘‘(iv) developing career path information for cer-
tified professionals to encourage retention in govern-
ment positions; 
‘‘(v) coordinating with the Office of Personnel 
Management for human capital efforts; and 
‘‘(vi) managing rotation assignments to support 
opportunities to apply skills included in certification.’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(l) ACQUISITION INTERNSHIP
AND TRAINING PROGRAMS.—All 
Federal civilian agency acquisition internship or acquisition training 
programs shall follow guidelines provided by the Office of Federal 
Procurement Policy to ensure consistent training standards nec-
essary to develop uniform core competencies throughout the Federal 
Government.’’. 
(d) EXPANDED SCOPE OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE TRAINING 
FUND.—Section 1703(i) of such title is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘to support the training 
of the acquisition workforce of the executive agencies’’ and 
inserting ‘‘to support the activities set forth in section 1201(a) 
of this title’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘ensure that amounts 
collected for training under this subsection are not used for 
a purpose other than the purpose specified in paragraph (2)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘ensure that amounts collected under this section 
are not used for a purpose other than the activities set forth 
in section 1201(a) of this title’’. 
(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section, or the 
amendments made by this section, shall be construed to preclude 
the Secretary of Defense from establishing acquisition workforce 
policies, procedures, training standards, and certification require-
ments for acquisition positions in the Department of Defense, as 
provided in chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code.
H. R. 1540—229 
SEC. 865. MODIFICATION OF DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE 
DETERMINATIONS 
ON 
ENTRY 
INTO 
COOPERATIVE 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH NATO 
AND OTHER FRIENDLY ORGANIZATIONS AND COUNTRIES. 
Section 2350a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘and to one other official of the Department of Defense’’ 
and inserting ‘‘, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Research and Engineering’’. 
SEC. 866. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEST PROGRAM FOR NEGOTIA-
TION OF COMPREHENSIVE SMALL BUSINESS SUBCON-
TRACTING PLANS. 
(a) THREE-YEAR EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of section 834 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 
1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 
2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 
(b) ADDITIONAL REPORT.—Subsection (f) of such section is 
amended by inserting ‘‘and March 1, 2012,’’ after ‘‘March 1, 1994,’’. 
SEC. 867. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAM. 
Section 831(j) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 
Sec. 901. Revision of defense business systems requirements. 
Sec. 902. Qualifications for appointments to the position of Deputy Secretary of De-
fense. 
Sec. 903. Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal re-
sponsibility for airship programs. 
Sec. 904. Memoranda of agreement on identification and dedication of enabling ca-
pabilities of general purpose forces to fulfill certain requirements of spe-
cial operations forces. 
Sec. 905. Assessment of Department of Defense access to non-United States citi-
zens with scientific and technical expertise vital to the national security 
interests. 
Sec. 906. Sense of Congress on use of modeling and simulation in Department of 
Defense activities. 
Sec. 907. Sense of Congress on ties between Joint Warfighting and Coalition Center 
and Allied Command Transformation of NATO. 
Sec. 908. Report on effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint Warfare 
Analysis Center on personnel skills. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
Sec. 911. Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning Sys-
tem. 
Sec. 912. Authority to designate increments or blocks of satellites as major subpro-
grams subject to acquisition reporting requirements. 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 
Sec. 921. Report on implementation of recommendations by the Comptroller Gen-
eral on intelligence information sharing. 
Sec. 922. Insider threat detection.
H. R. 1540—230 
Sec. 923. Expansion of authority for exchanges of mapping, charting, and geodetic 
data to include nongovernmental organizations and academic institu-
tions. 
Sec. 924. Ozone Widget Framework. 
Sec. 925. Plan for incorporation of enterprise query and correlation capability into 
the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise. 
Sec. 926. Facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities abroad. 
Subtitle D—Total Force Management 
Sec. 931. General policy for total force management. 
Sec. 932. Revisions to Department of Defense civilian personnel management con-
straints. 
Sec. 933. Additional amendments relating to total force management. 
Sec. 934. Modifications of annual defense manpower requirements report. 
Sec. 935. Revisions to strategic workforce plan. 
Sec. 936. Amendments to requirement for inventory of contracts for services. 
Sec. 937. Preliminary planning and duration of public-private competitions. 
Sec. 938. Conversion of certain functions from contractor performance to perform-
ance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 
Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related Matters 
Sec. 941. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assessment of contingency plans. 
Sec. 942. Quadrennial defense review. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 951. Activities to improve multilateral, bilateral, and regional cooperation re-
garding cybersecurity. 
Sec. 952. Report on United States Special Operations Command structure. 
Sec. 953. Strategy to acquire capabilities to detect previously unknown cyber at-
tacks. 
Sec. 954. Military activities in cyberspace. 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense 
Management 
SEC. 901. REVISION OF DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS. 
Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2222. Defense business systems: architecture, account-
ability, and modernization 
‘‘(a) CONDITIONS
FOR OBLIGATION
OF FUNDS
FOR COVERED 
DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM PROGRAMS.—Funds available to the 
Department of Defense, whether appropriated or non-appropriated, 
may not be obligated for a defense business system program that 
will have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of 
the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress 
under section 221 of this title unless— 
‘‘(1) the appropriate pre-certification authority for the cov-
ered defense business system program has determined that— 
‘‘(A) the defense business system program is in compli-
ance with the enterprise architecture developed under sub-
section (c) and appropriate business process re-engineering 
efforts have been undertaken to ensure that— 
‘‘(i) the business process supported by the defense 
business system program is or will be as streamlined 
and efficient as practicable; and 
‘‘(ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf sys-
tems to meet unique requirements or incorporate 
unique requirements or incorporate unique interfaces 
has been eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent 
practicable;
H. R. 1540—231 
‘‘(B) the defense business system program is necessary 
to achieve a critical national security capability or address 
a critical requirement in an area such as safety or security; 
or 
‘‘(C) the defense business system program is necessary 
to prevent a significant adverse effect on a project that 
is needed to achieve an essential capability, taking into 
consideration the alternative solutions for preventing such 
adverse effect; 
‘‘(2) the covered defense business system program has been 
reviewed and certified by the investment review board estab-
lished under subsection (g); and 
‘‘(3) the certification of the investment review board under 
paragraph (2) has been approved by the Defense Business 
Systems Management Committee established by section 186 
of this title. 
‘‘(b) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS IN VIOLATION OF REQUIREMENTS.— 
The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense 
business system program that has not been certified and approved 
in accordance with subsection (a) is a violation of section 
1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31. 
‘‘(c) ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR DEFENSE BUSINESS SYS-
TEMS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Defense 
Business Systems Management Committee, shall develop— 
‘‘(A) an enterprise architecture, known as the defense busi-
ness enterprise architecture, to cover all defense business sys-
tems, and the functions and activities supported by defense 
business systems, which shall be sufficiently defined to effec-
tively guide, constrain, and permit implementation of interoper-
able defense business system solutions and consistent with 
the policies and procedures established by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget; and 
‘‘(B) a transition plan for implementing the defense busi-
ness enterprise architecture. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate responsibility and 
accountability for the defense business enterprise architecture con-
tent, including unambiguous definitions of functional processes, 
business rules, and standards, as follows: 
‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics shall be responsible and accountable for 
the content of those portions of the defense business enterprise 
architecture that support acquisition, logistics, installations, 
environment, or safety and occupational health activities of 
the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall 
be responsible and accountable for the content of those portions 
of the defense business enterprise architecture that support 
financial management activities or strategic planning and budg-
eting activities of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness shall be responsible and accountable for the content 
of those portions of the defense business enterprise architecture 
that support human resource management activities of the 
Department of Defense. 
‘‘(D) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content 
of those portions of the defense business enterprise architecture
H. R. 1540—232 
that support information technology infrastructure or informa-
tion assurance activities of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(E) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense shall be responsible and accountable for devel-
oping and maintaining the defense business enterprise architec-
ture as well as integrating business operations covered by sub-
paragraphs (A) through (D). 
‘‘(d) COMPOSITION OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.—The defense 
business enterprise architecture developed under subsection 
(c)(1)(A) shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) An information infrastructure that, at a minimum, 
would enable the Department of Defense to— 
‘‘(A) comply with all applicable law, including Federal 
accounting, financial management, and reporting require-
ments; 
‘‘(B) routinely produce timely, accurate, and reliable 
business and financial information for management pur-
poses; 
‘‘(C) integrate budget, accounting, and program 
information and systems; and 
‘‘(D) provide for the systematic measurement of 
performance, including the ability to produce timely, rel-
evant, and reliable cost information. 
‘‘(2) Policies, procedures, data standards, performance 
measures, and system interface requirements that are to apply 
uniformly throughout the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(3) A target defense business systems computing environ-
ment, compliant with the defense business enterprise architec-
ture, for each of the major business processes conducted by 
the Department of Defense, as determined by the Chief 
Management Officer of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(e) COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN.—The transition plan 
developed under subsection (c)(1)(B) shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) A listing of the new systems that are expected to 
be needed to complete the defense business enterprise architec-
ture, along with each system’s time-phased milestones, perform-
ance measures, financial resource needs, and risks or challenges 
to integration into the business enterprise architecture. 
‘‘(2) A listing of the defense business systems existing as 
of September 30, 2011 (known as ‘legacy systems’) that will 
not be part of the defense business enterprise architecture, 
together with the schedule for terminating those legacy systems 
that provides for reducing the use of those legacy systems 
in phases. 
‘‘(3) A listing of the legacy systems (referred to in subpara-
graph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense business 
systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3), 
together with a strategy for making the modifications to those 
systems that will be needed to ensure that such systems comply 
with the defense business enterprise architecture, including 
time-phased milestones, performance measures, and financial 
resource needs. 
‘‘(f) DESIGNATION OF APPROPRIATE PRE-CERTIFICATION AUTHORI-
TIES AND SENIOR OFFICIALS.—(1) For purposes of subsections (a) 
and (g), the appropriate pre-certification authority for a defense 
business system program is as follows:
H. R. 1540—290 
‘‘(b) The Secretary may submit the report required by subsection 
(a) by including the materials required in the report as an exhibit 
to the defense authorization request submitted pursuant to section 
113a of this title in the fiscal year concerned.’’. 
(3) Section 127b(f) is amended by striking ‘‘December 1’’ 
and inserting ‘‘February 1’’. 
(4)(A) Section 228 is amended— 
(i) in subsection (a)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY
REPORT.—’’ and 
inserting ‘‘BIANNUAL REPORT.—’’; 
(II) by striking ‘‘a quarterly report’’ and inserting 
‘‘a biannual report’’; and 
(III) by striking ‘‘fiscal-year quarter’’ and inserting 
‘‘two fiscal-year quarters’’; and 
(ii) in subsection (c)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; 
(II) by striking ‘‘a quarter of a fiscal year after 
the first quarter of that fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘the 
second two fiscal-year quarters of a fiscal year’’; 
(III) by striking ‘‘the first quarter of that fiscal 
year’’ and inserting ‘‘the first two fiscal-year quarters 
of that fiscal year’’; and 
(IV) by striking paragraph (2). 
(B)(i) The heading of such section is amended to read 
as follows: 
‘‘§ 228. Biannual reports on allocation of funds within oper-
ation and maintenance budget subactivities’’. 
(ii) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 
is amended by striking the item relating to section 228 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘228. Biannual reports on allocation of funds within operation and maintenance 
budget subactivities.’’. 
(5) Subsection (f) of section 408 is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(f) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—Whenever the Secretary of 
Defense provides assistance to a foreign nation under this section, 
the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report on the assistance provided. Each such report shall identify 
the nation to which the assistance was provided and include a 
description of the type and amount of the assistance provided.’’. 
(6) Section 2482(d)(1) is amended by inserting ‘‘in the 
United States’’ after ‘‘commissary store’’. 
(7) Section 2608(e)(1) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘each quarter’’ and inserting ‘‘the second 
quarter and the fourth quarter’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘the preceding quarter’’ and inserting 
‘‘the preceding two quarters’’. 
(8) Section 2645(d) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
(9) Section 2803(b) is amended by striking ‘‘21-day period’’ 
and inserting ‘‘seven-day period’’. 
(10) Section 9514(c) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
(11) Section 10543(c)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘15 days’’ 
and inserting ‘‘90 days’’.
H. R. 1540—309 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘, or stockpiled conventional muni-
tions, as applicable,’’ after ‘‘explosive remnants of war’’; 
and 
(4) in subsection (d)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions 
assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian demining assistance’’ each 
place it appears; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, and whether such 
assistance was primarily related to the humanitarian 
demining efforts or stockpiled conventional munitions 
assistance’’ after ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 
(5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following 
new subsection (e): 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘humanitarian demining assistance’, as it 
relates to training and support, means detection and clearance 
of landmines and other explosive remnants of war, and includes 
activities related to the furnishing of education, training, and 
technical assistance with respect to explosive safety, the detec-
tion and clearance of landmines and other explosive remnants 
of war, and the disposal, demilitarization, physical security, 
and stockpile management of potentially dangerous stockpiles 
of explosive ordnance. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘stockpiled conventional munitions assist-
ance’, as it relates to the support of humanitarian assistance 
efforts, means training and support in the disposal, demili-
tarization, physical security, and stockpile management of 
potentially dangerous stockpiles of explosive ordnance, and 
includes activities related to the furnishing of education, 
training, and technical assistance with respect to explosive 
safety, the detection and clearance of landmines and other 
explosive remnants of war, and the disposal, demilitarization, 
physical security, and stockpile management of potentially dan-
gerous stockpiles of explosive ordnance.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 407. Humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled 
conventional 
munitions 
assistance: 
authority; 
limitations’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 407 and inserting the following new 
item: 
‘‘407. Humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled conventional munitions as-
sistance: authority; limitations.’’. 
SEC. 1093. NUMBER OF NAVY CARRIER AIR WINGS AND CARRIER AIR 
WING HEADQUARTERS. 
The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the Navy main-
tains— 
(1) a minimum of 10 carrier air wings; and 
(2) for each such carrier air wing, a dedicated and fully 
staffed headquarters.
H. R. 1540—333 
Stat. 394), as amended by section 1218 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 
383; 124 Stat. 4394), is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 
2011’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’. 
(b) AMOUNT OF FUNDS AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d) of such sec-
tion is amended by striking ‘‘$400,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$450,000,000’’. 
SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER 
DEFENSE ARTICLES AND PROVIDE DEFENSE SERVICES 
TO THE MILITARY AND SECURITY FORCES OF IRAQ AND 
AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of section 1234 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2532), as amended by section 1214 
of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4391), is further amended 
by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 
(b) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section, as 
so amended, is further amended by striking ‘‘and every 90 days 
thereafter through March 31, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘every 90 days 
thereafter through March 31, 2012, and at the end of each calendar 
quarter, if any, thereafter through March 31, 2013, in which the 
authority in subsection (a) is implemented’’. 
SEC. 1213. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSE-
MENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT 
PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 393), as amended by section 1223 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2519) and section 1213 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 
383; 124 Stat. 4391), is further amended by striking ‘‘by section 
1510 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘for fiscal year 2012 for overseas 
contingency operations’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d)(1) of 
such section, as so amended, is further amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2010 or 2011’’ and inserting 
‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 
(2) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$1,600,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$1,690,000,000’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section, 
as so amended, is further amended by inserting a comma after 
‘‘Budget’’. 
(d) 
EXTENSION
OF
NOTICE
REQUIREMENT
RELATING
TO 
REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PAKI-
STAN.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended 
by section 1213(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2011, is further amended by striking ‘‘September 
30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2013’’.
H. R. 1540—365 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan ...............
Bagram Air Base .....................................
$80,000,000 
Germany ....................
Grafenwoehr ............................................
$38,000,000 
Landstuhl .................................................
$63,000,000 
Oberdachstetten ......................................
$12,200,000 
Stuttgart ..................................................
$12,200,000 
Vilseck ......................................................
$20,000,000 
Korea, Republic of .....
Camp Carroll ...........................................
$41,000,000 
Camp Henry ............................................
$48,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104 and available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may construct or acquire family housing units (including land 
acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or loca-
tions, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Units 
Amount 
Germany ......................
Grafenwoehr ................
Family Hous-
ing New 
Construc-
tion (26 
units) .........
$13,000,000 
Illesheim ......................
Family Hous-
ing Replace-
ment Con-
struction 
(80 units) ...
$41,000,000 
Vilseck .........................
Family Hous-
ing New 
Construc-
tion (22 
units) .........
$12,000,000 
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 
and available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design activities with respect to the construction or improve-
ment of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,897,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2104 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Army may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000.
H. R. 1540—381 
Army Reserve—Continued 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Kansas ................................
Kansas City ...................................
$13,000,000 
Massachusetts ....................
Attleboro .........................................
$22,000,000 
Minnesota ...........................
Saint Joseph ..................................
$11,800,000 
Missouri ..............................
Weldon Springs .............................
$19,000,000 
North Carolina ...................
Greensboro .....................................
$19,000,000 
New York ............................
Schenectady ...................................
$20,000,000 
South Carolina ...................
Orangeburg ....................................
$12,000,000 
Wisconsin ...........................
Fort McCoy ....................................
$27,300,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 
Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the 
amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......................
Pittsburgh ......................................
$13,759,000 
Tennessee ...........................
Memphis .........................................
$7,949,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Beale AFB ......................................
$6,100,000 
Moffett Field ..................................
$26,000,000 
Hawaii ................................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
$39,521,000 
Indiana ...............................
Fort Wayne IAP .............................
$4,000,000 
Massachusetts ....................
Otis ANGB .....................................
$7,800,000 
Maryland ............................
Martin State Airport .....................
$4,900,000 
Ohio ....................................
Springfield Beckley-MAP ..............
$6,700,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and
H. R. 1540—382 
carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
March AFB ....................................
$16,393,000 
South Carolina ...................
Charleston AFB .............................
$9,593,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for the costs of acquisition, 
architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities 
for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, 
under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the 
cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601. 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 2611. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that 
Act (122 Stat. 527) and extended by section 2607 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4454), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Army National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Pennsylvania 
East Fallowfield 
Township ...........
Readiness Center (SBCT) ......
$ 8,300,000 
SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B 
of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorizations set 
forth in the tables in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 
2602, and 2603 of that Act (122 Stat. 4699), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, 
whichever is later.
H. R. 1540—383 
(b) TABLE.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as 
follows: 
Army National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Indiana ..........
Camp Atterbury ...
Machine Gun Range ..............
$ 5,800,000 
Nevada ..........
Elko .......................
Readiness Center ...................
$11,375,000 
Army Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
New York ......
Staten Island ........
Reserve Center .......................
$18,550,000 
Navy and Marine Corps Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project 
Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Delaware .......
Wilmington ...........
Reserve Center .......................
$11,530,000 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Mississippi 
Gulfport-Biloxi 
International 
Airport ...........
Relocate munitions storage com-
plex ..............................................
$3,400,000 
SEC. 2613. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 AND 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT ARMY RESERVE CENTER PROJECT, 
CARLIN, NEVADA.—In the case of the authorization contained in 
the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4701) for Elko, Nevada, for construction of an Army Reserve 
Center, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct a Readi-
ness Center at Carlin, Nevada. 
(b) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT ARMY RESERVE CENTER PROJECT, 
FORT WADSWORTH, NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4703) for Staten Island, New York, for construc-
tion of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may 
instead construct an addition/alteration at the Army Reserve Center 
at Fort Wadsworth, New York. 
(c) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT READINESS CENTER PROJECT, 
COATESVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law
H. R. 1540—384 
110–181, 122 Stat. 527) for Fallowfield Township, Pennsylvania, 
for construction of a Readiness Center, the Secretary of the Army 
may instead construct the Readiness Center at Coatesville, Pennsyl-
vania. 
TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND 
CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. 
Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through De-
partment of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2703. Authority to complete specific base closure and realignment rec-
ommendations. 
Sec. 2704. Special considerations related to transportation infrastructure in consid-
eration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment. 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 
1990. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for base closure and realign-
ment activities, including real property acquisition and military 
construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 
of such Act, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE 
CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2703 and available for base realignment 
and closure activities as specified in the funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out base closure and 
realignment activities, including real property acquisition and mili-
tary construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Clo-
sure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public 
Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Depart-
ment of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 
2906A of such Act, as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
SEC. 2703. AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE SPECIFIC BASE CLOSURE AND 
REALIGNMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 
(a) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO EXTEND IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) complete all closures and realignments recommended 
in the report of the Base Closure and Realignment Commission 
transmitted by the President to Congress in accordance with 
section 2914(e) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 
10 U.S.C. 2687 note), as expeditiously as possible; and 
(2) complete the closure of the Umatilla Chemical Depot, 
Oregon, as recommended in the report of the Base Closure 
and Realignment Commission transmitted by the President
H. R. 1540—495 
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 
OPERATING FORCES 
030 
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ...........................................
84,200 
84,200 
050 
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .........................
28,100 
28,100 
070 
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................
20,700 
20,700 
100 
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..........................................
84,500 
84,500 
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
217,500 
217,500 
TOTAL 
OPERATION 
& 
MAINTENANCE, 
ARMY RESERVE ...................................................
217,500 
217,500 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 
OPERATING FORCES 
010 
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ...............
38,402 
38,402 
020 
INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .....................................
400 
400 
040 
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ..................................
11,330 
11,330 
060 
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ....................
10,137 
10,137 
100 
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .............................................
13,827 
13,827 
140 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
74,148 
74,148 
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 
RESERVE ................................................................
74,148 
74,148 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 
RESERVE 
OPERATING FORCES 
010 
OPERATING FORCES ..........................................................
31,284 
31,284 
050 
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................
4,800 
4,800 
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
36,084 
36,084 
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MA-
RINE CORPS RESERVE .....................................
36,084 
36,084 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RE-
SERVE 
OPERATING FORCES 
010 
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ..............................................
4,800 
4,800 
030 
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ......................................................
131,000 
131,000 
050 
BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................
6,250 
6,250 
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
142,050 
142,050 
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 
FORCE RESERVE ................................................
142,050 
142,050 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL 
GUARD 
OPERATING FORCES 
010 
MANEUVER UNITS ..............................................................
89,930 
89,930 
060 
AVIATION ASSETS ...............................................................
130,848 
130,848 
070 
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................
110,011 
100,011 
Duplicate Request for Military Pay Support Contract 
(Requested in both SAG 121 and SAG 131) ..............
[–10,000 ] 
100 
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..........................................
34,788 
34,788 
120 
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ ........................
21,967 
21,967 
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
387,544 
377,544 
TOTAL 
OPERATION 
& 
MAINTENANCE, 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD .................................
387,544 
377,544
H. R. 1540—496 
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL 
GUARD 
OPERATING FORCES 
020 
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................
34,050 
34,050 
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .........................
34,050 
34,050 
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 
NATIONAL GUARD ..............................................
34,050 
34,050 
AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 
010 
INFRASTRUCTURE ..............................................................
1,304,350 
1,304,350 
020 
EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ............................
1,667,905 
1,432,490 
Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Af-
ghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ...............................
[–235,415 ] 
030 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..........................................
751,073 
751,073 
040 
SUSTAINMENT .....................................................................
3,331,774 
3,033,984 
Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Af-
ghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ...............................
[–297,790 ] 
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ....................
7,055,102 
6,521,897 
MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 
060 
INFRASTRUCTURE ..............................................................
1,128,584 
1,128,584 
070 
EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ............................
1,530,420 
601,915 
Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Af-
ghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ...............................
[–928,505 ] 
080 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..........................................
1,102,430 
1,102,430 
090 
SUSTAINMENT .....................................................................
1,938,715 
1,800,425 
Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Af-
ghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ...............................
[–138,290 ] 
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ...................
5,700,149 
4,633,354 
ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES 
110 
SUSTAINMENT .....................................................................
21,187 
21,187 
120 
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..........................................
7,344 
7,344 
130 
INFRASTRUCTURE ..............................................................
15,000 
15,000 
150 
EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ............................
1,218 
1,218 
SUBTOTAL ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES .................
44,749 
44,749 
TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES 
FUND .......................................................................
12,800,000 
11,200,000 
AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 
POWER 
010 
POWER ...................................................................................
300,000 
300,000 
020 
TRANSPORTATION ..............................................................
100,000 
100,000 
030 
WATER ...................................................................................
50,000 
50,000 
040 
OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES ..........................................
25,000 
–50,000 
Authorization Adjustment ..............................................
[–75,000 ] 
SUBTOTAL POWER ....................................................
475,000 
400,000 
TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE 
FUND .......................................................................
475,000 
400,000 
UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 
UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 
010 
UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS .....................
–4,000,000 
Reduction to reflect policy change on troop strength in 
Afghanistan ..................................................................
[–4,000,000 ]
H. R. 1540—497 
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PRO-
VISIONS ......................................................................
–4,000,000 
TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVI-
SIONS ......................................................................
–4,000,000 
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ............
89,035,031 
86,211,026 
TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
MILITARY PERSONNEL .............................................................
142,828,848 
141,992,228 
Unobligated Balances (Section 421) .............................
[–325,620 ] 
Hostile fire pay proration ..............................................
[–42,000 ] 
Reduction of Army Referral Bonus ...............................
[–21,000 ] 
Undistributed transfer to Title XV ................................
[–448,000 ] 
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
OPERATIONS. 
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
MILITARY PERSONNEL .....................................................................
11,228,566 
11,676,566 
Undistributed transfer from Title IV ....................................
[448,000 ] 
TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program Title 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ............................
101,194 
101,194 
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ................
101,194 
101,194 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 
CONTAINER DECONSOLIDATION 
WAR RESERVE MATERIAL .......................................................
65,372 
65,372 
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .....
65,372 
65,372 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 
ADJ TO MATCH CONTINUING RESOLUTION 
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) ....................................
31,614 
31,614 
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE- 
WIDE ...................................................................................
31,614 
31,614
H. R. 1540—513 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
Army Res 
Kansas City 
Army Reserve Center/Land .......................
13,000 
13,000 
Massachusetts 
Army Res 
Attleboro 
Army Reserve Center/Land .......................
22,000 
22,000 
Minnesota 
Army Res 
Saint Joseph 
Army Reserve Center ................................
11,800 
11,800 
Missouri 
Army Res 
Weldon Springs 
Army Reserve Center ................................
19,000 
19,000 
New York 
Army Res 
Schenectady 
Army Reserve Center ................................
20,000 
20,000 
North Carolina 
Army Res 
Greensboro 
Army Reserve Center/Land .......................
19,000 
19,000 
South Carolina 
Army Res 
Orangeburg 
Army Reserve Center/Land .......................
12,000 
12,000 
Wisconsin 
Army Res 
Fort McCoy 
Automated Record Fire Range ..................
4,600 
4,600 
Army Res 
Fort McCoy 
Container Loading Facility .......................
5,300 
5,300 
Army Res 
Fort McCoy 
Modified Record Fire Known Distance 
Range.
5,400 
5,400 
Army Res 
Fort McCoy 
NCOA Phase III—Billeting .......................
12,000 
12,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Planning and Design .................................
28,924 
28,924 
Army Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Unspecified Minor Construction ...............
2,925 
2,925 
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 
280,549 
280,549 
Pennsylvania 
N/MC Res 
Pittsburgh 
Armed Forces Reserve Center (Pitts-
burgh).
13,759 
13,759 
Tennessee 
N/MC Res 
Memphis 
Reserve Training Center ...........................
7,949 
7,949 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
N/MC Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
MCNR Unspecified Minor Construction ..
2,000 
2,000 
N/MC Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Planning and Design .................................
2,591 
2,591 
Total Military Construction, Naval Reserve 
26,299 
26,299 
California 
Air NG 
Beale AFB 
Wing Operations and Training Facility ...
6,100 
6,100 
Air NG 
Moffett Field 
Replace Pararescue Training Facility ......
26,000 
26,000 
Hawaii 
Air NG 
Joint Base Pearl 
Harbor-Hickam 
TFI—F–22 
Combat 
Aircraft 
Parking 
Apron.
12,721 
12,721 
Air NG 
Joint Base Pearl 
Harbor-Hickam 
TFI—F–22 Flight Simulator Facility .......
19,800 
19,800 
Air NG 
Joint Base Pearl 
Harbor-Hickam 
TFI—F–22 Weapons Load Crew Training 
Facilit.
7,000 
7,000 
Indiana 
Air NG 
Fort Wayne IAP 
A–10 Facility Conversion—Munitions .....
4,000 
4,000 
Maryland 
Air NG 
Martin State Air-
port 
TFI—C–27 Conversion - Squadron Oper-
ations.
4,900 
4,900 
Massachusetts 
Air NG 
Otis ANGB 
TFI—CNAF Beddown - Upgrade Facility 
7,800 
7,800 
Ohio 
Air NG 
Springfield Beck-
ley-Map 
Alter Predator Operations Center ............
6,700 
6,700
H. R. 1540—514 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Air NG 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance & Production Facilities .......
Air NG 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Operational Facilities ................................
Air NG 
Various World-
wide Locations 
Minor Construction ....................................
9,000 
9,000 
Air NG 
Various World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design .................................
12,225 
12,225 
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 
116,246 
116,246 
California 
AF Res 
March AFB 
Airfield Control Tower/Base Ops ..............
16,393 
16,393 
South Carolina 
AF Res 
Charleston AFB 
TFI Red Horse Readiness & Trng Center 
9,593 
9,593 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
AF Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Planning & Design .....................................
2,200 
2,200 
AF Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Training Facilities .....................................
AF Res 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Unspecified Minor Construction ...............
5,434 
5,434 
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 
33,620 
33,620 
Belgium 
FH Con Army 
Brussels 
Land Purchase for Gfoq (10 Units) ..........
10,000 
Germany 
FH Con Army 
Grafenwoehr 
Family Housing New Construction (26 
Units).
13,000 
13,000 
FH Con Army 
Illesheim 
Family 
Housing 
Replacement 
Construc(80 Units).
41,000 
41,000 
FH Con Army 
Vilseck 
Family Housing New Construction (22 
Units).
12,000 
12,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Construction Improvements (276 Units) ..
103,000 
103,000 
FH Con Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Family Housing P&D ................................
7,897 
7,897 
Total Family Housing Construction, Army 
186,897 
176,897 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
14,256 
14,256 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing .......................................................
204,426 
204,426 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance of Real Property ..................
105,668 
105,668 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Management Account ................................
54,728 
54,728
H. R. 1540—515 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
605 
605 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Privatization Support Costs ......................
25,741 
25,741 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Services Account ........................................
15,797 
15,797 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Utilities Account ........................................
73,637 
73,637 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army 
494,858 
494,858 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Classified Improvements ...........................
FH Con AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Construction Improvements ......................
80,546 
80,546 
FH Con AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Planning and Design .................................
4,208 
4,208 
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 
84,804 
84,804 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
35,290 
35,290 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Housing Privatization ................................
47,571 
47,571 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing .......................................................
80,775 
80,775 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing Account .........................................
122 
122 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance (RPMA & RPMC) ................
98,132 
98,132 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance Account ................................
2,001 
2,001 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Management Account ................................
55,395 
55,395 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Management Account ................................
1,996 
1,996 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
2,165 
2,165 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Services Account ........................................
13,675 
13,675 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Utilities Account ........................................
67,639 
67,639 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force 
404,761 
404,761
H. R. 1540—516 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Design .........................................................
3,199 
3,199 
FH Con Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Improvements .............................................
97,773 
97,773 
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps 
100,972 
100,972 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
15,979 
15,979 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing .......................................................
79,798 
79,798 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance of Real Property ..................
97,231 
97,231 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Management Account ................................
61,090 
61,090 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
476 
476 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Privatization Support Costs ......................
28,582 
28,582 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Services Account ........................................
14,510 
14,510 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Utilities Account ........................................
70,197 
70,197 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine 
Corps 
367,863 
367,863 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Furnishings Account ..................................
2,699 
2,699 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing .......................................................
10,100 
10,100 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Leasing .......................................................
36,552 
36,552 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance of Real Property ..................
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Maintenance of Real Property ..................
546 
546 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Management Account ................................
347 
347
H. R. 1540—517 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Services Account ........................................
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Utilities Account ........................................
280 
280 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Utilities Account ........................................
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide 
50,723 
50,723 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
HOAP 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Homeowers Assistance Program ...............
1,284 
1,284 
Total Homeowners Assistance Fund 
1,284 
1,284 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FHIF 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Family Housing Improvement Fund ........
2,184 
2,184 
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 
2,184 
2,184 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
COMM ADD 3: Galena Fol, AK ................
933 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–100: Planing, Design and Manage-
ment.
6,090 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–101: Various Locations ....................
5,021 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–126: NSCS, Athens, GA ..................
325 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–138: NAS Brunswick, ME ...............
421 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–157: MCSA Kansas City, MO .........
1,442 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–158: NSA New Orleans, LA ............
2,056 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, 
CA.
9,763 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–2: NS Pascagoula, MS .....................
515 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
DON–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria 
Reg Ap.
196 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–106: Kansas Army Ammunition 
Plant, KS.
45,769 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–110: Mississippi Army Ammo Plant, 
MS.
122
H. R. 1540—518 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–112: 
River 
Bank 
Army 
Ammo 
Plant, CA.
320 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–117: Deseret Chemical Depot, UT ...
34,011 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–119: Newport Chemical Depot, IN ..
467 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–120: Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR
9,092 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
IND–122: Lone Star Army Ammo Plant, 
TX.
19,367 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
INT–4: NGA Activities ..............................
1,791 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
MED–2: Walter Reed NMMC, Bethesda, 
MD.
18,586 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
MED–57: Brooks City Base, TX ...............
205 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Program Management Various Locations 
828 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Program Management Various Locations 
32,298 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–113: Fort Monroe, VA ......................
23,601 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–121: Fort Gillem, GA .......................
8,903 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–131: USAR Command and Con-
trol—SE.
250 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–166: USAR Command and Con-
trol—NW.
1,000 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–167: USAR Command and Con-
trol—NE.
250 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–168: USAR Command and Con-
trol—SW.
250 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–222: Fort Mcpherson, GA ................
9,921 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–223: Fort Monmouth, NJ .................
21,908 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–242: RC Transformation in NY .......
259 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–36: Red River Army Depot ..............
1,207 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
USA–63: U.S. Army Garrison (Selfridge) 
1,609 
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 2005 
258,776
H. R. 1540—519 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Conference 
Agreement 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure 
Base Realignment & Closure ....................
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, Air 
Force 
Base Realignment & Closure ....................
123,476 
123,476 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, 
Army 
Base Realignment & Closure ....................
70,716 
70,716 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, Navy 
Base Realignment & Closure ....................
129,351 
129,351 
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 1990 
323,543 
323,543 
Unspecified 
PYS 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Prior Year Savings-Air Force ....................
–32,000 
PYS 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Prior Year Savings-Defense-Wide ............
–131,400 
PYS 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Prior Year Savings-Navy ...........................
–25,000 
PYS 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Loca-
tions 
Prior Year Savings-Army ..........................
–100,000 
Total Prior Year Savings 
–288,400 
Total Division B 
14,766,047 
13,069,438 
Grand Total 
14,766,047 
13,069,438 
TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 
Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies 
Appropriation Summary: 
Energy Programs 
ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE ...............
6,187 
Atomic Energy Defense Activities 
National nuclear security administration: 
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES ...........................................
7,629,716 
7,274,329 
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ......
2,549,492 
2,333,303 
NAVAL REACTORS ...................................................
1,153,662 
1,080,000 
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR ......................
450,060 
382,700 
Total, National nuclear security administration ...
11,782,930 
11,070,332
H. R. 1540—525 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program 
FY 2012 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Waste isolation pilot plant .......................................................
147,136 
Central characterization project ..............................................
23,975 
Transportation ...........................................................................
29,044 
Community and regulatory support ........................................
28,771 
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .............................................
228,926 
215,134 
Program direction .............................................................................
321,628 
321,628 
Program Support ..............................................................................
20,380 
Community, regulatory and program support ...............................
91,279 
Safeguards and Security: 
Oak Ridge Reservation .............................................................
17,300 
17,300 
Paducah .....................................................................................
9,435 
9,435 
Portsmouth ................................................................................
16,412 
16,412 
Richland/Hanford Site ..............................................................
69,234 
69,234 
Savannah River Site .................................................................
130,000 
133,193 
Waste Isolation Pilot Project ....................................................
4,845 
4,845 
West Valley ................................................................................
1,600 
1,600 
Total, Safeguards and Security .................................................
248,826 
252,019 
Technology development ..................................................................
32,320 
11,000 
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup .....................................
5,410,162 
5,026,381 
Use of prior year balances ...............................................................
–3,381 
–3,381 
Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup .........................................
5,406,781 
5,023,000 
Other Defense Activities 
Health, safety and security 
Health, safety and security ......................................................
349,445 
335,436 
Program direction .....................................................................
107,037 
102,000 
Total, Health, safety and security ............................................
456,482 
437,436 
Office of Legacy Management 
Legacy management .................................................................
157,514 
157,514 
Program direction .....................................................................
12,586 
12,086 
Total, Office of Legacy Management .......................................
170,100 
169,600 
Defense-related activities 
Infrastructure 
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ...........................
98,500 
93,350 
Total, Defense-related activities ...............................................
98,500 
93,350 
Defense related administrative support .........................................
118,836 
118,836 
Acquisitions workforce improvement ..............................................
11,892 
Office of hearings and appeals ........................................................
4,142 
4,142 
Total, Other Defense Activities ........................................................
859,952 
823,364 
DIVISION E—SBIR AND STTR 
REAUTHORIZATION 
TITLE L—SHORT TITLE; DEFINITIONS 
SEC. 5001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘SBIR/STTR Reauthorization 
Act of 2011’’.