SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shark Conservation 
Act of 2009’’. 
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF HIGH SEAS DRIFTNET FISHING 
MORATORIUM PROTECTION ACT. 
Section 610(a) of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing 
Moratorium Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1826k(a)) is 
amended— 
(1) by striking so much as precedes paragraph 
(1) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(a) IDENTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall identify, 
and list in the report under section 607— 
‘‘(1) a nation if—’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1) by redesignating subpara-
graphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respec-
tively; 
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 
(3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively; 
(4) by moving subparagraphs (A) through (C) 
(as so redesignated) 2 ems to the right; 
(5) in subparagraph (C) (as so redesignated) by 
striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 
and 
(6) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) a nation if—
‘‘(A) fishing vessels of that nation are en-
gaged, or have been engaged during the pre-
ceding calendar year, in fishing activities or 
practices that target or incidentally catch 
sharks; and 
‘‘(B) the nation has not adopted a regu-
latory program to provide for the conservation 
of sharks, including measures to prohibit re-
moval of any of the fins of a shark (including 
the tail) and discarding the carcass of the shark 
at sea, that is comparable to that of the United 
States, taking into account different condi-
tions.’’. 
SEC. 3. AMENDMENT OF MAGNUSON-STEVENS FISHERY 
CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. 
Section 307(1) of Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Con-
servation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1857(1)) is 
amended— 
(1) by amending subparagraph (P) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(P)(i) to remove any of the fins of a 
shark (including the tail) at sea; 
‘‘(ii) to have custody, control, or pos-
session of any such fin aboard a fishing
vessel unless it is naturally attached to the 
corresponding carcass; 
‘‘(iii) to transfer any such fin from 
one vessel to another vessel at sea, or to 
receive any such fin in such transfer, with-
out the fin naturally attached to the cor-
responding carcass; or 
‘‘(iv) to land any such fin that is not 
naturally attached to the corresponding 
carcass, or to land any shark carcass with-
out such fins naturally attached;’’; and 
(2) by striking the matter following subpara-
graph (R) and inserting the following: 
‘‘For purposes of subparagraph (P), there shall be 
a rebuttable presumption that if any shark fin (including 
the tail) is found aboard a vessel, other than a fishing 
vessel, without being naturally attached to the cor-
responding carcass, such fin was transferred in violation 
of subparagraph (P)(iii) and that if, after landing, the 
total weight of shark fins (including the tail) landed from 
any vessel exceeds five percent of the total weight of shark
carcasses landed, such fins were taken, held, or landed in 
violation of subparagraph (P).’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives March 2, 
2009. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 81 
AN ACT 
To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Morato-
rium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act to 
improve the conservation of sharks.