datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
211
HR 1000 RFS
‘‘(B) tribal lands within or abutting the
Grand Canyon National Park; or
‘‘(C) any unit of the National Park System
located in Alaska or any other land or water lo-
cated in Alaska.
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—This section shall apply to
the Grand Canyon National Park if section 3 of
Public Law 100–91 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 note; 101 Stat.
674–678) is no longer in effect.
‘‘(3) LAKE MEAD.—This section shall not apply
to any air tour operator while flying over or near the
Lake Mead National Recreation Area solely, as a
transportation route, to conduct an air tour over the
Grand Canyon National Park.
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following
definitions apply:
‘‘(1) COMMERCIAL AIR TOUR OPERATOR.—The
term ‘commercial air tour operator’ means any per-
son who conducts a commercial air tour operation.
‘‘(2) EXISTING COMMERCIAL AIR TOUR OPER-
ATOR.—The term ‘existing commercial air tour oper-
ator’ means a commercial air tour operator that was
actively engaged in the business of providing com-
mercial air tour operations over a national park at
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 64
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Recognizing the severity of the issue of cervical
health, and for other purposes.
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 64
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Whereas cervical cancer annually strikes an estimated 15,000
women in the United States;
Whereas during an average woman’s lifetime cervical cancer
strikes one out of every 50 American women;
Whereas it is estimated that during this decade more than
150,000 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in
the United States;
•HCON 64 EH
Whereas according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and
End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute,
when cervical cancer is detected at an early stage, the
five-year survival rate is 91 percent;
Whereas in most cases cervical cancer is a preventable dis-
ease yet is one of the leading causes of death among
women worldwide;
Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, the mortality rate among American women
with cervical cancer declined during the period 1960
through 1997, but now has begun to rise;
Whereas clinical studies have confirmed that the human
papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of cervical cancer
and unknown precursor lesions; and
Whereas cervical cancer survivors have shown tremendous
courage and determination in the face of adversity: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Cervical Cancer
Public Awareness Resolution’’.
SEC. 
2. 
RECOGNIZING 
THE 
SEVERITY 
OF 
CERVICAL
CANCER.
The Congress—
(1) recognizes the severity of the issue of cer-
vical health;
•HCON 64 EH
(2) calls on the United States as a whole to
support both the individuals with cervical cancer as
well as the family and loved ones of individuals with
cervical cancer through public awareness and edu-
cation;
(3) calls on the people of the United States to
take this opportunity to learn about cervical cancer
and the improved detection methods available;
(4) recognizes through education and early de-
tection, women can lower their likelihood for devel-
oping cervical cancer;
(5) recognizes the importance of federally fund-
ed programs that provide cervical cancer screenings
and follow-up services to medically underserved indi-
viduals; and
(6) encourages all women to have regular Pap
smear tests.
Passed the House of Representatives October 3,
2000.
Attest:
Clerk.
•HR 1161 RH1S
‘‘(C) securities, including all securities
issued by governmental units.
‘‘(3) the term ‘eligible entity’ means—
‘‘(A) an issuer; or
‘‘(B) a trust, corporation, partnership, gov-
ernmental unit, limited liability company (in-
cluding a single member limited liability com-
pany), or other entity engaged exclusively in the
business of acquiring and transferring eligible
assets directly or indirectly to an issuer and tak-
ing actions ancillary thereto;
‘‘(4) the term ‘issuer’ means a trust, corporation,
partnership, governmental unit, limited liability com-
pany (including a single member limited liability
company), or other entity engaged exclusively in the
business of acquiring and holding eligible assets,
issuing securities backed by eligible assets, and taking
actions ancillary thereto; and
‘‘(5) the term ‘transferred’ means the debtor, pur-
suant to a written agreement, represented and war-
ranted that eligible assets were sold, contributed, or
otherwise conveyed with the intention of removing
them from the estate of the debtor pursuant to sub-
section (b)(5) (whether or not reference is made to this
IV
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 65
Encouraging the people of the United States to reflect upon and celebrate
Tejano music and other forms of Latin music, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 18, 1999
Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself and Mr. ORTIZ) submitted the following concur-
rent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and
the Workforce
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Encouraging the people of the United States to reflect upon
and celebrate Tejano music and other forms of Latin
music, and for other purposes.
Whereas the music of the Latin community, like the music
of other ethnic communities in the United States, rep-
resents the rich ethnic fabric of the Nation and is an in-
tegral part of the modern culture of the United States;
Whereas Tejano music is a form of Latin music that, like the
Hispanic population of the United States, is a blend of
old and new;
Whereas Tejano music is derived from conjunto, which was
heavily influenced not only by the Latin polka, ranchera,
and cumbia, but also by German music played on accor-
•HCON 65 IH
dions and strings and by a variety of other European and
African musical traditions;
Whereas the Tejano sound further evolved in the 1960s and
1970s when Latin musicians infused conjunto with or-
chestral sounds, pop, and rhythm and blues;
Whereas the late Selena, the Tejano sensation from Corpus
Christi, Texas, splashed Tejano onto the North American
music scene with a unique blend of conjunto and rock ’n’
roll;
Whereas Texans and members of the Mexican-American com-
munity throughout the United States draw strength and
pride from Tejano music;
Whereas Tejano music is inspiring to young people and, par-
ticularly for Mexican-Americans, serves as a starting
point for exploring their cultural heritage;
Whereas Tejano music is one of the fastest-growing forms of
Latin music, and Texas is the Tejano capital of the
world;
Whereas the Tejano Music Awards is an annual event that
creates greater awareness and appreciation for Tejano
music;
Whereas the 19th Annual Tejano Music Awards will be cele-
brated in San Antonio, Texas, and a record number of
participants are expected to attend; and
Whereas Tejano musicians and musicians who perform other
varieties of Latin music have needed to struggle to re-
ceive the same rights, protection, and compensation as
other music performers: Now, therefore, be it
•HCON 65 IH
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That the Congress encourages the people of
the United States—
(1) to reflect upon and celebrate Tejano music
and other forms of Latin music;
(2) to recognize that Tejano musicians and mu-
sicians who perform other varieties of Latin music
deserve the same rights, protection, and compensa-
tion as other music performers; and
(3) to provide resources and support for the
preservation of Latin music.
Æ
IV
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 66
Expressing a declaration of space leadership.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 18, 1999
Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BARRETT of Ne-
braska, Mr. BOYD, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. TALENT, and Mr.
WEXLER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee
on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing a declaration of space leadership.
Whereas the continued exploration, development, and use of
space is critical to our Nation’s future as we enter a new
millennium;
Whereas America’s investment in space has worked to feed
the human hunger for exploration, knowledge, and dis-
covery;
Whereas our national commitment and work in space have
helped to profoundly shape our Nation by saving lives by
enhancing our well-being here on earth;
Whereas it is evident that an aggressive national commitment
by government, industry, and the public to the continued
•HCON 66 IH
exploration and use of space will serve to strengthen
America’s leadership in the global economy in the new
millennium;
Whereas space is vital to not only a peaceful, but a pros-
perous world;
Whereas space has been and will continue to be a critical
driver of the American economy, which translates into
jobs and prosperity for all Americans;
Whereas only true visionary leadership for space will bring
forth economic leadership for future generations of Amer-
icans; and
Whereas space is a key to unlocking future economic power
through a furtherance of education, a commitment to
safety, an improvement in communications, the advance-
ment of health care, and better stewardship of our envi-
ronment: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That the Congress declares its support for
the strongest possible commitment to space exploration
and development as a national priority. The Congress de-
clares that in order to protect America’s personal and eco-
nomic health, and realize continued economic prosperity
and leadership, we as a nation must give our highest com-
mitment to—
(1) policies that ensure economic opportunities
in the new burgeoning market that space offers;
HCON 68 EAS1S
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$13,590,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,380,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,494,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,133,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,651,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,807,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,834,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,513,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,929,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,352,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$14,998,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,181,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
•HCON 66 IH
(2) United States global leadership and com-
petitive advantage in the development of commercial
space products and services;
(3) space defense systems that allow our armed
forces the greatest advantage in guarding our na-
tional security and defending American people and
our interests;
(4) assurance that the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration can guarantee American
leadership in the exploration of space and the devel-
opment of advanced technologies; and
(5) policies that promote private investment in
space products and services.
Æ
tection and advocacy services, to disabled bene-
ficiaries, including individuals participating in
the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Pro-
gram established under section 1148, the pro-
gram established under section 1619, and other
programs that are designed to encourage dis-
abled beneficiaries to work;
‘‘(B) conduct directly, or through grants,
cooperative agreements, or contracts, ongoing
outreach efforts to disabled beneficiaries (and
to the families of such beneficiaries) who are
potentially eligible to participate in Federal or
State work incentive programs that are de-
signed to assist disabled beneficiaries to work,
including—
‘‘(i) preparing and disseminating in-
formation explaining such programs; and
‘‘(ii) working in cooperation with
other Federal, State, and private agencies
and nonprofit organizations that serve dis-
abled beneficiaries, and with agencies and
organizations that focus on vocational re-
habilitation and work-related training and
counseling;
117
dividual enrolled with the provider of such services,
or
(3) be made on a fee-for-service basis under
section 612.
(b) PAYMENT ADJUSTMENT.—Payments under sub-
section (a) may include, consistent with the budgets devel-
oped under this title—
(1) an additional amount, as set by the State
health security program, to cover the costs incurred
by a provider which serves persons not covered by
this Act whose health care is essential to overall
community health and the control of communicable
disease, and for whom the cost of such care is other-
wise uncompensated,
(2) an additional amount, as set by the State
health security program, to cover the reasonable
costs incurred by a provider that furnishes case
management 
services 
(as 
defined 
in 
section
1915(g)(2) of the Social Security Act), transpor-
tation services, and translation services, and
(3) an additional amount, as set by the State
health security program, to cover the costs incurred
by a provider in conducting health professional edu-
cation programs in connection with the provision of
such services.
quired and any other assets or pledges used to secure
the Federal credit instrument, furnish—
‘‘(A) reasonable assurances of the air car-
rier’s ability and intention to repay the Federal
credit instrument within the terms established by
the Secretary—
‘‘(i) to continue its operations as an
air carrier; and
‘‘(ii) to the extent that the Secretary
determines to be necessary, to continue its
operations as an air carrier between the
same route or routes being operated by the
air carrier at the time of the issuance of the
Federal credit instrument; and
‘‘(B) reasonable protection to the United
States.
‘‘(g) LIMITATION ON COMBINED AMOUNT OF FEDERAL
CREDIT INSTRUMENTS.—The Secretary shall not allow the
combined amount of Federal credit instruments available
for any aircraft purchase under this section to exceed—
‘‘(1) 50 percent of the cost of the aircraft pur-
chase; or
‘‘(2) $100,000,000 for any single obligor.
‘‘(h) REQUIREMENT.—Subject to subsection (i), no
Federal credit instrument may be made under this section
significant functions of the air traffic control
system;
‘‘(C) review and approve the Administra-
tor’s plans for any major reorganization of the
Federal Aviation Administration that would im-
pact on the management of the air traffic control
system;
‘‘(D) review and approve the Administra-
tor’s cost accounting and financial management
structure and technologies to help ensure efficient
and cost-effective air traffic control operation;
and
‘‘(E) review the performance and coopera-
tion of managers responsible for major acquisi-
tion projects, including the ability of the man-
agers to meet schedule and budget targets.
‘‘(5) BUDGET.—To—
‘‘(A) review and approve the budget request
of the Federal Aviation Administration related
to the air traffic control system prepared by the
Administrator;
‘‘(B) submit such budget request to the Sec-
retary of Transportation; and
‘‘(C) ensure that the budget request supports
the annual and long-range strategic plans.
HCON 68 EAS1S——2
HCON 68 EAS1S——3
HCON 68 EAS1S——4
HCON 68 EAS1S——5
HCON 68 EAS1S——6
HCON 68 EAS1S——7
HCON 68 EAS1S——8
HCON 68 EAS1S——9
HCON 68 EAS1S——10
HCON 68 EAS1S——11
HCON 68 EAS1S——12
HCON 68 EAS1S——13
HCON 68 EAS1S——14
HCON 68 EAS1S——15
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 68
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
•HCON 68 EH
SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000.
The Congress declares that this is the concurrent res-
olution on the budget for fiscal year 2000 and that the
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2001 through
2009 are hereby set forth.
SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.
The following budgetary levels are appropriate for
each of fiscal years 2000 through 2009:
(1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—For purposes of the
enforcement of this resolution:
(A) The recommended levels of Federal
revenues are as follows:
Fiscal year 2000: $1,408,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,435,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,456,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,532,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,584,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,651,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,684,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,733,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $1,802,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $1,867,500,000,000.
(B) The amounts by which the aggregate
levels of Federal revenues should be changed
are as follows:
•HCON 68 EH
Fiscal year 2000: $0.
Fiscal year 2001: ¥$9,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: ¥$52,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: ¥$30,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: ¥$50,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: ¥$59,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: ¥$106,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: ¥$138,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: ¥$153,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: ¥$178,200,000,000.
(2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—For purposes
of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate
levels of total new budget authority are as follows:
Fiscal year 2000: $1,426,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,456,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,487,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,558,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,611,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,665,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,697,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,752,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $1,813,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $1,874,400,000,000.
•HCON 68 EH
(3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—For purposes of the
enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels
of total budget outlays are as follows:
Fiscal year 2000: $1,408,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,435,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,455,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $1,532,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $1,583,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $1,638,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $1,666,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $1,715,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $1,781,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009: $1,841,300,000,000.
(4) SURPLUSES.—For purposes of the enforce-
ment of this resolution, the amounts of the surpluses
are as follows:
Fiscal year 2000: $400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $0.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003: $100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004: $200,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005: $12,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006: $18,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007: $17,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008: $21,600,000,000.
HJ 68 RDS
case the passed version shall be used in place of the
reported version for purposes of this joint resolution;
(9) the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act,
2000;
(10) the Department of Transportation and Re-
lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000;
(11) the Treasury and General Government Ap-
propriations Act, 2000; and
(12) the Departments of Veterans Affairs and
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000:
Provided, That whenever the amount which would be made
available or the authority which would be granted in
these Acts as passed by the House and Senate as of Octo-
ber 1, 1999, is different than that which would be avail-
able or granted under current operations, the pertinent
project or activity shall be continued at a rate for oper-
ations not exceeding the current rate: Provided further,
That whenever there is no amount made available under
any of these appropriations Acts as passed by the House
and Senate as of October 1, 1999, for a continuing project
or activity which was conducted in fiscal year 1999 and
for which there is fiscal year 2000 funding included in
the budget request, the pertinent project or activity shall
be continued at the rate for current operations under the
The Secretary shall submit the budget request referred to
in paragraph (5)(B) for any fiscal year to the President
who shall submit such request, without revision, to the Com-
mittees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Appro-
priations of the House of Representatives and the Commit-
tees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Appro-
priations of the Senate, together with the President’s annual
budget request for the Federal Aviation Administration for
such fiscal year.
‘‘(e) REPORTING OF OVERTURNING OF BOARD DECI-
SIONS.—If the Secretary or Administrator overturns a deci-
sion of the Oversight Board, the Secretary or Adminis-
trator, as appropriate shall report such action to the Presi-
dent, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Com-
merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
‘‘(f) BOARD PERSONNEL MATTERS.—
‘‘(1) COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Each member of the
Oversight Board who—
‘‘(i) 
appointed 
under 
subsection
(b)(1)(A); or
‘‘(ii) 
appointed 
under 
subsection
(b)(1)(D) and is not otherwise a Federal of-
ficer or employee,
•HCON 68 RH
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,100,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$12,200,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
(19) Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$275,500,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $275,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
IV
Union Calendar No. 39
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 68
[Report No. 106–73]
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for
fiscal year 2000 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each
of fiscal years 2001 through 2009.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 1999
Mr. KASICH, from the Committee on the Budget, reported the following con-
current resolution; which was committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States
Government for fiscal year 2000 and setting forth appro-
priate budgetary levels for each of fiscal years 2001
through 2009.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
IV
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. CON. RES. 6
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding support for the formation
of the China Democracy Party (CDP) and to urge the Government
of the People’s Republic of China to guarantee the rights and safety
of the CDP organizers.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 6, 1999
Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. COX of California, Mr. GIL-
MAN, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr.
HUNTER, Mr. PORTER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. POMBO, and Mr.
RADANOVICH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on International Relations
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding support for
the formation of the China Democracy Party (CDP)
and to urge the Government of the People’s Republic
of China to guarantee the rights and safety of the CDP
organizers.
Whereas the establishment of the China Democracy Party on
June 24, 1998, was the first attempt since the founding
of the People’s Republic of China to officially register an
opposition party, with the intention of developing a
multiparty system on mainland China;
Whereas during the visit of President Clinton to the People’s
Republic of China in June 1998, the Chinese Communist
•HCON 72 IH
bring about an end to ethnic cleansing in the region:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That the Congress gives its full support to
the United States Armed Forces in their efforts to halt
the brutal ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians.
Æ