171 
HR 3080 PCS
(B) 
NON-FEDERAL
LAND.—The 
term 
‘‘non-Federal land’’ means the approximately 
34 acres of land situated in Rogers County, 
Oklahoma, and owned by the Tulsa Port of 
Catoosa that lie immediately south and east of 
the Federal land. 
(3) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS.— 
(A) DEEDS.— 
(i) DEED TO NON-FEDERAL LAND.— 
The Secretary may only accept conveyance 
of the non-Federal land by warranty deed, 
as determined acceptable by the Secretary. 
(ii) DEED TO FEDERAL LAND.—The 
Secretary shall convey the Federal land to 
the Tulsa Port of Catoosa by quitclaim 
deed and subject to any reservations, 
terms, and conditions the Secretary deter-
mines necessary to— 
(I) allow the United States to op-
erate and maintain the McClellan- 
Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Sys-
tem; and 
(II) protect the interests of the 
United States. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
172 
HR 3080 PCS
(iii) CASH
PAYMENT.—If the ap-
praised fair market value of the Federal 
land, as determined by the Secretary, ex-
ceeds the appraised fair market value of 
the non-Federal land, as determined by the 
Secretary, the Tulsa Port of Catoosa shall 
make a cash payment to the United States 
reflecting the difference in the appraised 
fair market values. 
(b) CITY OF ASOTIN, WASHINGTON.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the city of Asotin, Asotin County, Washington, 
without monetary consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the land de-
scribed in paragraph (3). 
(2) REVERSION.—If the land transferred under 
this subsection ceases at any time to be used for a 
public purpose, the land shall revert to the United 
States. 
(3) DESCRIPTION.—The land to be conveyed to 
the city of Asotin, Washington, under this sub-
section are— 
(A) the public ball fields designated as 
Tracts 1503, 1605, 1607, 1609, 1611, 1613, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
173 
HR 3080 PCS
1615, 1620, 1623, 1624, 1625, 1626, and 
1631; and 
(B) other leased areas designated as 
Tracts 1506, 1522, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526, 
1527, 1529, 1530, 1531, and 1563. 
(c) GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.— 
(1) SURVEY TO OBTAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.— 
The exact acreage and the legal description of any 
real property to be conveyed under this section shall 
be determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the 
Secretary. 
(2) APPLICABILITY OF PROPERTY SCREENING 
PROVISIONS.—Section 2696 of title 10, United 
States Code, shall not apply to any conveyance 
under this section. 
(3) ADDITIONAL
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS.— 
The Secretary may require that any conveyance 
under this section be subject to such additional 
terms and conditions as the Secretary considers nec-
essary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States. 
(4) COSTS
OF
CONVEYANCE.—An entity to 
which a conveyance is made under this section shall 
be responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
174 
HR 3080 PCS
including real estate transaction and environmental 
documentation costs, associated with the conveyance. 
(5) LIABILITY.—An entity to which a convey-
ance is made under this section shall hold the 
United States harmless from any liability with re-
spect to activities carried out, on or after the date 
of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. 
The United States shall remain responsible for any 
liability with respect to activities carried out, before 
such date, on the real property conveyed. 
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. AUTHORIZATION OF FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDIES. 
The following final feasibility studies for water re-
sources development and conservation and other purposes 
are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substan-
tially in accordance with the plan, and subject to the con-
ditions, described in the respective reports designated in 
this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
175 
HR 3080 PCS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. TX, 
LA 
Sabine 
Neches 
Waterway, 
Southeast 
Texas and 
Southwest 
Louisiana 
July 22, 
2011 
$779,399,000 
$359,227,000 
2. FL 
Jacksonville 
Harbor- 
Milepoint 
April 30, 
2012 
$27,804,000 
$9,122,000 
3. GA 
Savannah 
Harbor 
Expansion 
Project 
Aug. 17, 
2012 
$461,000,000 
$201,000,000 
4. TX 
Freeport 
Harbor 
Jan. 7, 
2013 
$121,132,000 
$116,342,000 
5. FL 
Canaveral 
Harbor 
(Sect 203 
Sponsor 
Report) 
Feb. 25, 
2013 
$28,652,000 
$11,588,000 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. KS 
Topeka 
Aug. 24, 
2009 
$15,494,000 
$8,343,000 
2. CA 
American 
River Wa-
tershed, 
Common 
Features 
Project, 
Natomas 
Basin 
Dec. 30, 
2010 
$943,300,000 
$479,500,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
176 
HR 3080 PCS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
3. IA 
Cedar River, 
Cedar 
Rapids 
Jan. 27, 
2011 
$67,216,000 
$36,194,000 
4. MN, 
ND 
Fargo-Moor-
head Metro 
Dec. 19, 
2011 
$801,542,000 
$979,806,000 
5. KY 
Ohio River 
Shoreline, 
Paducah 
May 16, 
2012 
$12,893,000 
$6,943,000 
(3) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Initial 
Federal 
Cost and 
Estimated 
Total 
Federal 
Cost for Life 
of Project 
E. 
Estimated 
Initial 
Non-Federal 
Cost and 
Estimated 
Total 
Non-Federal 
Cost for Life 
of Project 
1. NC 
West Onslow 
Beach and 
New River 
Inlet (Top-
sail Beach) 
Sept. 28, 
2009 
Initial Cost: 
$30,557,000 
Total Cost: 
$132,372,000 
Initial Cost: 
$17,315,000 
Total Cost: 
$132,372,000 
2. NC 
Surf City and 
North Top-
sail Beach 
Dec. 30, 
2010 
Initial Cost: 
$81,484,000 
Total Cost: 
$106,182,000 
Initial Cost: 
$43,900,000 
Total Cost: 
$106,182,000 
3. CA 
San Clemente 
Shoreline 
April 5, 
2012 
Initial Cost: 
$7,500,000 
Total Cost: 
$43,400,000 
Initial Cost: 
$4,000,000 
Total Cost: 
$43,400,000 
(4) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
177 
HR 3080 PCS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. MS 
Mississippi 
Coastal 
Improve-
ment Pro-
gram 
(MSCIP) 
Hancock, 
Harrison, 
and Jack-
son Coun-
ties 
Sept. 15, 
2009 
$815,090,000 
$438,890,000 
(5) ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. MD 
Mid-Chesa-
peake Bay 
Island 
Aug. 24, 
2009 
$1,221,721,000 
$657,849,000 
2. FL 
Central and 
Southern 
Florida 
Project, 
Com-
prehensive 
Everglades 
Restora-
tion Plan, 
Caloosaha-
tchee River 
(C–43) 
West Basin 
Storage 
Project, 
Hendry 
County 
March 11, 
2010 
$297,189,000 
$297,189,000 
3. LA 
Louisiana 
Coastal 
Area 
Dec. 30, 
2010 
$954,452,000 
$513,936,000 
4. MN 
Marsh Lake 
Dec. 30, 
2011 
$6,403,000 
$3,564,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
179 
HR 3080 PCS
(1) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, 
Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida, au-
thorized by section 1001(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1052), is modi-
fied to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $152,510,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $92,007,000 and a non-Fed-
eral cost of $60,503,000. 
(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) shall take 
effect on November 8, 2007. 
(b) LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN (CADY MARSH 
DITCH), INDIANA.—The project for flood control, Little 
Calumet River Basin (Cady Marsh Ditch), Indiana, au-
thorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), and modified by 
section 127 of Public Law 109–103 (119 Stat. 2259), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $269,988,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $202,800,000 and a non-Federal 
cost of $67,188,000. 
Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 
2013. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 224 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 3080 
AN ACT 
To provide for improvements to the rivers and har-
bors of the United States, to provide for the con-
servation and development of water and related 
resources, and for other purposes. 
OCTOBER 28, 2013 
Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:03 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H3080.PCS
H3080
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS