in the reports titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water 
Resources Development’’ submitted to Congress on Janu-
ary 29, 2015, and January 29, 2016, respectively, pursu-
ant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise 
reviewed by Congress: 
(1) OUACHITA-BLACK RIVERS, ARKANSAS AND 
LOUISIANA.—Project for navigation, Ouachita-Black 
Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana. 
(2) CACHE
CREEK
SETTLING
BASIN, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for flood damage reduction and 
ecosystem restoration, Cache Creek Settling Basin, 
California. 
(3) COYOTE
VALLEY
DAM, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, and water supply, Coyote Valley Dam, 
California. 
(4) DEL
ROSA
CHANNEL, 
CITY
OF
SAN 
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA.—Project for flood dam-
age reduction and ecosystem restoration, Del Rosa 
Channel, city of San Bernardino, California. 
(5) MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CALIFORNIA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Merced County 
Streams, California. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(6) MISSION-ZANJA CHANNEL, CITIES OF SAN 
BERNARDINO AND REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA.—Project 
for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restora-
tion, 
Mission-Zanja 
Channel, 
cities 
of 
San 
Bernardino and Redlands, California. 
(7) 
SOBOBA
INDIAN
RESERVATION, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction, 
Soboba Indian Reservation, California. 
(8) INDIAN RIVER INLET, DELAWARE.—Project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Indian 
River Inlet, Delaware. 
(9) LEWES
BEACH, DELAWARE.—Project for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lewes 
Beach, Delaware. 
(10) MISPILLION COMPLEX, KENT AND SUSSEX 
COUNTIES, DELAWARE.—Project for hurricane and 
storm damage reduction, Mispillion Complex, Kent 
and Sussex Counties, Delaware. 
(11) DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Daytona Beach, Florida. 
(12) BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GEORGIA.—Project 
for navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia. 
(13) DUBUQUE, IOWA.—Project for flood dam-
age reduction, Dubuque, Iowa. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(14) ST. 
TAMMANY
PARISH, 
LOUISIANA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
restoration, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. 
(15) CATTARAUGUS
CREEK, 
NEW
YORK.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Cattaraugus 
Creek, New York. 
(16) CAYUGA
INLET, ITHACA, NEW
YORK.— 
Project for navigation and flood damage reduction, 
Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, New York. 
(17) DELAWARE RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK, NEW 
JERSEY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND DELAWARE.—Projects 
for flood control, Delaware River Basin, New York, 
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, authorized 
by section 408 of the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 
644, chapter 596), and section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182), to review oper-
ations of the projects to enhance opportunities for 
ecosystem restoration and water supply. 
(18) SILVER CREEK, HANOVER, NEW YORK.— 
Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
restoration, Silver Creek, Hanover, New York. 
(19) TULSA AND WEST TULSA LEVEES, TULSA, 
OKLAHOMA.—Project for flood damage reduction, 
Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(20) STONYCREEK
AND
LITTLE
CONEMAUGH 
RIVERS, PENNSYLVANIA.—Project for flood damage 
reduction and recreation, Stonycreek and Little 
Conemaugh Rivers, Pennsylvania. 
(21) TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.— 
Project for ecosystem restoration, Tioga-Hammond 
Lake, Pennsylvania. 
(22) BRAZOS
RIVER, FORT
BEND
COUNTY, 
TEXAS.—Project for flood damage reduction in the 
vicinity of the Brazos River, Fort Bend County, 
Texas. 
(23) CHACON
CREEK, 
CITY
OF
LAREDO, 
TEXAS.—Project for flood damage reduction, eco-
system restoration, and recreation, Chacon Creek, 
city of Laredo, Texas. 
(24) 
CORPUS
CHRISTI
SHIP
CHANNEL, 
TEXAS.—Project for navigation, Corpus Christi Ship 
Channel, Texas. 
(25) CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, city of El Paso, Texas. 
(26) 
GULF
INTRACOASTAL
WATERWAY, 
BRAZORIA
AND
MATAGORDA
COUNTIES, TEXAS.— 
Project for navigation and hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
Brazoria and Matagorda Counties, Texas. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(27) PORT OF BAY CITY, TEXAS.—Project for 
navigation, Port of Bay City, Texas. 
(28) 
CHINCOTEAGUE
ISLAND, 
VIRGINIA.— 
Project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
navigation, and ecosystem restoration, Chincoteague 
Island, Virginia. 
(29) BURLEY
CREEK
WATERSHED, 
KITSAP 
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.—Project for flood damage 
reduction and ecosystem restoration, Burley Creek 
Watershed, Kitsap County, Washington. 
SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CER-
TAIN PROJECTS. 
(a) FEASIBILITY REPORTS.—The Secretary shall ex-
pedite the completion of a feasibility study for each of the 
following projects, and if the Secretary determines that 
the project is justified in a completed report, may proceed 
directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and de-
sign of the project: 
(1) Project for flood risk management, Little 
Colorado River at Winslow, Navajo County, Arizona. 
(2) Project for flood risk management, Lower 
San Joaquin River, California. 
(3) Project for flood risk management and eco-
system restoration, Sacramento River Flood Control 
System, California. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(4) Project for hurricane and storm damage 
risk reduction, Ft. Pierce, Florida. 
(5) Project for flood risk management, Des 
Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Iowa. 
(6) Project for navigation, Mississippi River 
Ship Channel, Louisiana. 
(7) Project for flood risk management, North 
Branch Ecorse Creek, Wayne County, Michigan. 
(8) Project for navigation, Upper Ohio River, 
Pennsylvania. 
(b) POST-AUTHORIZATION CHANGE REPORTS.—The 
Secretary shall expedite completion of a post-authorization 
change report for the following projects: 
(1) Project for flood risk management, Swope 
Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, Missouri. 
(2) Project for hurricane and storm damage 
risk reduction, New Hanover County, North Caro-
lina. 
TITLE III—DEAUTHORIZATIONS 
AND RELATED PROVISIONS 
SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS. 
(a) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this section are— 
(1) to identify $5,000,000,000 in water re-
sources development projects authorized by Congress 
that are no longer viable for construction due to— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(A) a lack of local support; 
(B) a lack of available Federal or non-Fed-
eral resources; or 
(C) an authorizing purpose that is no 
longer relevant or feasible; 
(2) to create an expedited and definitive process 
for Congress to deauthorize water resources develop-
ment projects that are no longer viable for construc-
tion; and 
(3) to allow the continued authorization of 
water resources development projects that are viable 
for construction. 
(b) INTERIM DEAUTHORIZATION LIST.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall develop 
an interim deauthorization list that identifies— 
(A) each water resources development 
project, or separable element of a project, au-
thorized for construction before November 8, 
2007, for which— 
(i) planning, design, or construction 
was not initiated before the date of enact-
ment of this Act; or 
(ii) planning, design, or construction 
was initiated before the date of enactment 
of this Act, but for which no funds, Fed-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
eral or non-Federal, were obligated for 
planning, design, or construction of the 
project or separable element of the project 
during the current fiscal year or any of the 
6 preceding fiscal years; and 
(B) each project or separable element iden-
tified and included on a list to Congress for de-
authorization pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)). 
(2) PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSULTATION.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall so-
licit comments from the public and the Gov-
ernors of each applicable State on the interim 
deauthorization list developed under paragraph 
(1). 
(B) COMMENT PERIOD.—The public com-
ment period shall be 90 days. 
(3) SUBMISSION
TO
CONGRESS; 
PUBLICA-
TION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
close of the comment period under paragraph (2), 
the Secretary shall— 
(A) submit a revised interim deauthoriza-
tion list to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives; and 
(B) publish the revised interim deauthor-
ization list in the Federal Register. 
(c) FINAL DEAUTHORIZATION LIST.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall develop 
a final deauthorization list of water resources devel-
opment projects, or separable elements of projects, 
from the revised interim deauthorization list de-
scribed in subsection (b)(3). 
(2) DEAUTHORIZATION AMOUNT.— 
(A) PROPOSED
FINAL
LIST.—The Sec-
retary shall prepare a proposed final deauthor-
ization list of projects and separable elements of 
projects that have, in the aggregate, an esti-
mated Federal cost to complete that is at least 
$5,000,000,000. 
(B) DETERMINATION
OF
FEDERAL
COST 
TO COMPLETE.—For purposes of subparagraph 
(A), the Federal cost to complete shall take into 
account any allowances authorized by section 
902 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to the 
most recent project schedule and cost estimate. 
(3) IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECTS.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(A) SEQUENCING OF PROJECTS.— 
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 
identify projects and separable elements of 
projects for inclusion on the proposed final 
deauthorization list according to the order 
in which the projects and separable ele-
ments of the projects were authorized, be-
ginning 
with 
the 
earliest 
authorized 
projects and separable elements of projects 
and ending with the latest project or sepa-
rable element of a project necessary to 
meet the aggregate amount under para-
graph (2). 
(ii) FACTORS
TO
CONSIDER.—The 
Secretary may identify projects and sepa-
rable elements of projects in an order other 
than that established by clause (i) if the 
Secretary determines, on a case-by-case 
basis, that a project or separable element 
of a project is critical for interests of the 
United States, based on the possible im-
pact of the project or separable element of 
the project on public health and safety, the 
national economy, or the environment. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(iii) CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC COM-
MENTS.—In making determinations under 
clause (ii), the Secretary shall consider any 
comments received under subsection (b)(3). 
(B) APPENDIX.—The Secretary shall in-
clude as part of the proposed final deauthoriza-
tion list an appendix that— 
(i) identifies each project or separable 
element of a project on the interim de-
authorization list developed under sub-
section (b) that is not included on the pro-
posed final deauthorization list; and 
(ii) describes the reasons why the 
project or separable element is not in-
cluded on the proposed final list. 
(4) PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSULTATION.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall so-
licit comments from the public and the Gov-
ernors of each applicable State on the proposed 
final deauthorization list and appendix devel-
oped under paragraphs (2) and (3). 
(B) COMMENT PERIOD.—The public com-
ment period shall be 90 days. 
(5) SUBMISSION OF FINAL LIST TO CONGRESS; 
PUBLICATION.—Not later than 120 days after the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
date of the close of the comment period under para-
graph (4), the Secretary shall— 
(A) submit a final deauthorization list and 
an appendix to the final deauthorization list in 
a report to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives; and 
(B) publish the final deauthorization list 
and the appendix to the final deauthorization 
list in the Federal Register. 
(d) DEAUTHORIZATION; CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—After the expiration of the 
180-day period beginning on the date of submission 
of the final deauthorization list and appendix under 
subsection (c), a project or separable element of a 
project identified in the final deauthorization list is 
hereby deauthorized, unless Congress passes a joint 
resolution disapproving the final deauthorization list 
prior to the end of such period. 
(2) NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—A project or separable 
element of a project identified in the final de-
authorization list under subsection (c) shall not 
be deauthorized under this subsection if, before 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
the expiration of the 180-day period referred to 
in paragraph (1), the non-Federal interest for 
the project or separable element of the project 
provides sufficient funds to complete the project 
or separable element of the project. 
(B) TREATMENT OF PROJECTS.—Notwith-
standing subparagraph (A), each project and 
separable element of a project identified in the 
final deauthorization list shall be treated as de-
authorized for purposes of the aggregate de-
authorization amount specified in subsection 
(c)(2). 
(3) PROJECTS
IDENTIFIED
IN
APPENDIX.—A 
project or separable element of a project identified 
in the appendix to the final deauthorization list shall 
remain subject to future deauthorization by Con-
gress. 
(e) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
PROJECTS
RECEIVING 
FUNDS FOR POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDY.—A project or 
separable element of a project may not be identified on 
the interim deauthorization list developed under sub-
section (b), or the final deauthorization list developed 
under subsection (c), if the project or separable element 
received funding for a post-authorization study during the 
current fiscal year or any of the 6 preceding fiscal years. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(f) GENERAL PROVISIONS.— 
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the fol-
lowing definitions apply: 
(A) POST-AUTHORIZATION
STUDY.—The 
term ‘‘post-authorization study’’ means— 
(i) a feasibility report developed under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282); 
(ii) a feasibility study, as defined in 
section 105(d) of the Water Resources De-
velopment 
Act 
of 
1986 
(33 
U.S.C. 
2215(d)); or 
(iii) a review conducted under section 
216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 
U.S.C. 549a), including an initial appraisal 
that— 
(I) demonstrates a Federal inter-
est; and 
(II) requires additional analysis 
for the project or separable element. 
(B) WATER
RESOURCES
DEVELOPMENT 
PROJECT.—The term ‘‘water resources develop-
ment project’’ includes an environmental infra-
structure assistance project or program of the 
Corps of Engineers. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(2) 
TREATMENT
OF
PROJECT
MODIFICA-
TIONS.—For purposes of this section, if an author-
ized water resources development project or sepa-
rable element of the project has been modified by an 
Act of Congress, the date of the authorization of the 
project or separable element shall be deemed to be 
the date of the most recent such modification. 
SEC. 302. VALDEZ, ALASKA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the por-
tion of the project for navigation, Valdez, Alaska, identi-
fied as Tract G, Harbor Subdivision, shall not be subject 
to navigational servitude beginning on the date of enact-
ment of this Act. 
(b) ENTRY BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—The Fed-
eral Government may enter upon the property referred to 
in subsection (a) to carry out any required operation and 
maintenance of the general navigation features of the 
project referred to in subsection (a). 
SEC. 303. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, LOS AN-
GELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall— 
(1) prioritize the updating of the Water Control 
Manuals for control structures in the Los Angeles 
County Drainage Area, Los Angeles County, Cali-
fornia, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 
101–640; 104 Stat. 4611); and 
(2) integrate and incorporate into the project 
seasonal operations for water conservation and water 
supply. 
(b) PARTICIPATION.—The update referred to in sub-
section (a) shall be done in coordination with all appro-
priate Federal agencies, elected officials, and members of 
the public. 
SEC. 304. SUTTER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The separable element consti-
tuting the locally preferred plan increment reflected in the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 12, 2014, 
and authorized for construction in item 8 of the table con-
tained in section 7002(2) of the Water Resources Reform 
and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121; 128 
Stat. 1366) is no longer authorized beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
(b) SAVINGS
PROVISIONS.—The deauthorization 
under subsection (a) does not affect— 
(1) the national economic development plan sep-
arable element reflected in the report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated March 12, 2014, and authorized for 
construction in item 8 of the table contained in sec-
tion 7002(2) of the Water Resources Reform and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121; 
128 Stat. 1366); or 
(2) previous authorizations providing for the 
Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries 
project, including— 
(A) section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 
(39 Stat. 949, chapter 144); 
(B) section 12 of the Act of December 22, 
1944 (58 Stat. 900, chapter 665); 
(C) section 204 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1950 (64 Stat. 177, chapter 188); and 
(D) any other Acts relating to the author-
ization for the Sacramento River and major and 
minor tributaries project along the Feather 
River right bank between levee stationing 
1483+33 and levee stationing 2368+00. 
SEC. 305. ESSEX RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS. 
(a) DEAUTHORIZATION.—The portions of the project 
for navigation, Essex River, Massachusetts, authorized by 
the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 88, chapter 158), and 
modified by the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1121, 
chapter 425), and the Act of March 2, 1907 (34 Stat. 
1073, chapter 2509), that do not lie within the areas de-
scribed in subsection (b) are no longer authorized begin-
ning on the date of enactment of this Act. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREAS.—The areas 
described in this subsection are as follows: Beginning at 
a point N3056139.82 E851780.21, thence southwesterly 
about 156.88 feet to a point N3055997.75 E851713.67; 
thence southwesterly about 64.59 feet to a point 
N3055959.37 E851661.72; thence southwesterly about 
145.14 feet to a point N3055887.10 E851535.85; thence 
southwesterly about 204.91 feet to a point N3055855.12 
E851333.45; thence northwesterly about 423.50 feet to a 
point N3055976.70 E850927.78; thence northwesterly 
about 58.77 feet to a point N3056002.99 E850875.21; 
thence northwesterly about 240.57 feet to a point 
N3056232.82 E850804.14; thence northwesterly about 
203.60 feet to a point N3056435.41 E850783.93; thence 
northwesterly about 78.63 feet to a point N3056499.63 
E850738.56; thence northwesterly about 60.00 feet to a 
point N3056526.30 E850684.81; thence southwesterly 
about 85.56 feet to a point N3056523.33 E850599.31; 
thence southwesterly about 36.20 feet to a point 
N3056512.37 E850564.81; thence southwesterly about 
80.10 feet to a point N3056467.08 E850498.74; thence 
southwesterly about 169.05 feet to a point N3056334.36 
E850394.03; thence northwesterly about 48.52 feet to a 
point N3056354.38 E850349.83; thence northeasterly 
about 83.71 feet to a point N3056436.35 E850366.84; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
thence northeasterly about 212.38 feet to a point 
N3056548.70 E850547.07; thence northeasterly about 
47.60 feet to a point N3056563.12 E850592.43; thence 
northeasterly about 101.16 feet to a point N3056566.62 
E850693.53; thence southeasterly about 80.22 feet to a 
point N3056530.97 E850765.40; thence southeasterly 
about 99.29 feet to a point N3056449.88 E850822.69; 
thence southeasterly about 210.12 feet to a point 
N3056240.79 E850843.54; thence southeasterly about 
219.46 feet to a point N3056031.13 E850908.38; thence 
southeasterly about 38.23 feet to a point N3056014.02 
E850942.57; thence southeasterly about 410.93 feet to a 
point N3055896.06 E851336.21; thence northeasterly 
about 188.43 feet to a point N3055925.46 E851522.33; 
thence northeasterly about 135.47 feet to a point 
N3055992.91 E851639.80; thence northeasterly about 
52.15 feet to a point N3056023.90 E851681.75; thence 
northeasterly about 91.57 feet to a point N3056106.82 
E851720.59. 
SEC. 306. PORT OF CASCADE LOCKS, OREGON. 
(a) EXTINGUISHMENT OF PORTIONS OF EXISTING 
FLOWAGE EASEMENT.—With respect to the properties de-
scribed in subsection (b), beginning on the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the flowage easements described in sub-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
section (c) are extinguished above elevation 82.2 feet 
(NGVD29), the ordinary high water line. 
(b) AFFECTED PROPERTIES.—The properties de-
scribed in this subsection, as recorded in Hood River 
County, Oregon, are as follows: 
(1) Lots 3, 4, 5, and 7 of the ‘‘Port of Cascade 
Locks Business Park’’ subdivision, Instrument 
Number 2014–00436. 
(2) Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Hood River County 
Partition, Plat Number 2008–25P. 
(c) FLOWAGE EASEMENTS.—The flowage easements 
described in this subsection are identified as Tracts 302E– 
1 and 304E–1 on the easement deeds recorded as instru-
ments in Hood River County, Oregon, and described as 
follows: 
(1) A flowage easement dated October 3, 1936, 
recorded December 1, 1936, book 25, page 531 
(Records of Hood River County, Oregon), in favor of 
the United States (302E–1–Perpetual Flowage 
Easement from 10/5/37, 10/5/36, and 10/3/36; pre-
viously acquired as Tracts OH–36 and OH–41 and 
a portion of Tract OH–47). 
(2) A flowage easement dated October 5, 1936, 
recorded October 17, 1936, book 25, page 476 
(Records of Hood River County, Oregon), in favor of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
the United States, affecting that portion below the 
94-foot contour line above main sea level (304 E1– 
Perpetual Flowage Easement from 8/10/37 and 10/ 
3/36; previously acquired as Tract OH–042 and a 
portion of Tract OH–47). 
(d) FEDERAL LIABILITIES; CULTURAL, ENVIRON-
MENTAL, AND OTHER REGULATORY REVIEWS.— 
(1) FEDERAL LIABILITY.—The United States 
shall not be liable for any injury caused by the extin-
guishment of an easement under this section. 
(2) CULTURAL
AND
ENVIRONMENTAL
REGU-
LATORY
ACTIONS.—Nothing in this section estab-
lishes any cultural or environmental regulation relat-
ing to the properties described in subsection (b). 
(e) EFFECT ON OTHER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this 
section affects any remaining right or interest of the Corps 
of Engineers in the properties described in subsection (b). 
SEC. 307. CENTRAL DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, 
PENNSYLVANIA. 
(a) AREA TO BE DECLARED NONNAVIGABLE.—Sub-
ject to subsection (c), unless the Secretary finds, after con-
sultation with local and regional public officials (including 
local and regional public planning organizations), that 
there are substantive objections, those portions of the 
Delaware River, bounded by the former bulkhead and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
pierhead lines that were established by the Secretary of 
War and successors and described as follows, are declared 
to be nonnavigable waters of the United States: 
(1) Piers 70 South through 38 South, encom-
passing an area bounded by the southern line of 
Moore Street extended to the northern line of Cath-
erine Street extended, including the following piers: 
Piers 70, 68, 67, 64, 61–63, 60, 57, 55, 53, 48, 46, 
40, and 38. 
(2) Piers 24 North through 72 North, encom-
passing an area bounded by the southern line of Cal-
lowhill Street extended to the northern line of East 
Fletcher Street extended, including the following 
piers: Piers 24, 25, 27–35, 35.5, 36, 37, 38, 39, 49, 
51–52, 53–57, 58–65, 66, 67, 69, 70–72, and 
Rivercenter. 
(b) PUBLIC INTEREST DETERMINATION.—The Sec-
retary shall make the public interest determination under 
subsection (a) separately for each proposed project to be 
undertaken within the boundaries described in subsection 
(a), using reasonable discretion, not later than 150 days 
after the date of submission of appropriate plans for the 
proposed project. 
(c) LIMITS ON APPLICABILITY; REGULATORY RE-
QUIREMENTS.—The declaration under subsection (a) shall 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
apply only to those parts of the areas described in sub-
section (a) that are or will be bulkheaded and filled or 
otherwise occupied by permanent structures, including 
marina and recreation facilities. All such work is subject 
to all applicable Federal statutes and regulations, includ-
ing sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 
Stat. 1151, chapter 425; 33 U.S.C. 401 and 403), section 
404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
SEC. 308. RIVERCENTER, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA. 
Section 38(c) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 59j–1(c)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(except 30 years from such 
date of enactment, in the case of the area or any 
part thereof described in subsection (a)(5))’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Not-
withstanding the preceding sentence, the declaration 
of nonnavigability for the area described in sub-
section (a)(5), or any part thereof, shall not ex-
pire.’’. 
SEC. 309. JOE POOL LAKE, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall accept from the Trinity River Au-
thority of Texas, if received by September 30, 2016, 
$31,233,401 as payment in full of amounts owed to the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
United States, including any accrued interest, for the ap-
proximately 61,747.1 acre-feet of water supply storage 
space in Joe Pool Lake, Texas (previously known as 
Lakeview Lake), for which payment has not commenced 
under Article 5.a. (relating to project investment costs) 
of contract number DACW63–76–C–0106, as of the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 310. SALT CREEK, GRAHAM, TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood control, envi-
ronmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek, Gra-
ham, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 
106–53; 113 Stat. 278), is no longer authorized as a Fed-
eral project beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act. 
(b) CERTAIN PROJECT-RELATED CLAIMS.—The non- 
Federal interest for the project shall hold and save the 
United States harmless from any claim that has arisen, 
or that may arise, in connection with the project. 
(c) TRANSFER.—The Secretary is authorized to 
transfer any land acquired by the Federal Government for 
the project on behalf of the non-Federal interest that re-
mains in Federal ownership on or after the date of enact-
ment of this Act to the non-Federal interest. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(d) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that 
land transferred under subsection (c) ceases to be owned 
by the public, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
land and improvements thereon shall revert, at the discre-
tion of the Secretary, to the United States. 
SEC. 311. TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS CITY, TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The portion of the Texas City 
Ship Channel, Texas City, Texas, described in subsection 
(b) shall not be subject to navigational servitude beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act. 
(b) DESCRIPTION.—The portion of the Texas City 
Ship Channel described in this subsection is a tract or par-
cel containing 393.53 acres (17,142,111 square feet) of 
land situated in the City of Texas City Survey, Abstract 
Number 681, and State of Texas Submerged Lands 
Tracts 98A and 99A, Galveston County, Texas, said 
393.53 acre tract being more particularly described as fol-
lows: 
(1) Beginning at the intersection of an edge of 
fill along Galveston Bay with the most northerly east 
survey line of said City of Texas City Survey, Ab-
stract No. 681, the same being a called 375.75 acre 
tract patented by the State of Texas to the City of 
Texas City and recorded in Volume 1941, Page 750 
of the Galveston County Deed Records (G.C.D.R.), 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
from which a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
Brass Cap stamped ‘‘R 4–3’’ set in the top of the 
Texas City Dike along the east side of Bay Street 
bears North 56° 14′ 32″ West, a distance of 
6,045.31 feet and from which a found U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers Brass Cap stamped ‘‘R 4–2’’ set 
in the top of the Texas City Dike along the east side 
of Bay Street bears North 49° 13′ 20″ West, a dis-
tance of 6,693.64 feet. 
(2) Thence, over and across said State Tracts 
98A and 99A and along the edge of fill along said 
Galveston Bay, the following eight (8) courses and 
distances: 
(A) South 75° 49′ 13″ East, a distance of 
298.08 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(B) South 81° 16′ 26″ East, a distance of 
170.58 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(C) South 79° 20′ 31″ East, a distance of 
802.34 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(D) South 75° 57′ 32″ East, a distance of 
869.68 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the right. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(E) Easterly along said non-tangent curve 
to the right having a radius of 736.80 feet, a 
central angle of 24° 55′ 59″, a chord of South 
68° 47′ 35″ East – 318.10 feet, and an arc 
length of 320.63 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the left. 
(F) Easterly along said non-tangent curve 
to the left having a radius of 373.30 feet, a 
central angle of 31° 57′ 42″, a chord of South 
66° 10′ 42″ East – 205.55 feet, and an arc 
length of 208.24 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the right. 
(G) Easterly along said non-tangent curve 
to the right having a radius of 15,450.89 feet, 
a central angle of 02° 04′ 10″, a chord of South 
81° 56′ 20″ East – 558.04 feet, and an arc 
length of 558.07 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a compound curve to the right and the 
northeasterly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
(H) Southerly along said compound curve 
to the right and the easterly line of the tract 
herein described, having a radius of 1,425.00 
feet, a central angle of 133° 08′ 00″, a chord 
of South 14° 20′ 15″ East – 2,614.94 feet, and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
an arc length of 3,311.15 feet to a point on a 
line lying 125.00 feet northerly of and parallel 
with the centerline of an existing levee for the 
southeasterly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
(3) Thence, continuing over and across said 
State Tracts 98A and 99A and along lines lying 
125.00 feet northerly of, parallel, and concentric 
with the centerline of said existing levee, the fol-
lowing twelve (12) courses and distances: 
(A) North 78° 01′ 58″ West, a distance of 
840.90 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(B) North 76° 58′ 35″ West, a distance of 
976.66 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(C) North 76° 44′ 33″ West, a distance of 
1,757.03 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
tangent curve to the left. 
(D) Southwesterly, along said tangent 
curve to the left having a radius of 185.00 feet, 
a central angle of 82° 27′ 32″, a chord of South 
62° 01′ 41″ West – 243.86 feet, and an arc 
length of 266.25 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a compound curve to the left. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(E) Southerly, along said compound curve 
to the left having a radius of 4,535.58 feet, a 
central angle of 11° 06′ 58″, a chord of South 
15° 14′ 26″ West – 878.59 feet, and an arc 
length of 879.97 feet to an angle point of the 
tract herein described. 
(F) South 64° 37′ 11″ West, a distance of 
146.03 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(G) South 67° 08′ 21″ West, a distance of 
194.42 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(H) North 34° 48′ 22″ West, a distance of 
789.69 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(I) South 42° 47′ 10″ West, a distance of 
161.01 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(J) South 42° 47′ 10″ West, a distance of 
144.66 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
tangent curve to the right. 
(K) Westerly, along said tangent curve to 
the right having a radius of 310.00 feet, a cen-
tral angle of 59° 50′ 28″, a chord of South 72° 
42′ 24″ West – 309.26 feet, and an arc length 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
of 323.77 feet to an angle point of the tract 
herein described. 
(L) North 77° 22′ 21″ West, a distance of 
591.41 feet to the intersection of said parallel 
line with the edge of fill adjacent to the easterly 
edge of the Texas City Turning Basin for the 
southwesterly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed, from which a found U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers Brass Cap stamped ‘‘SWAN 2’’ 
set in the top of a concrete column set flush in 
the ground along the north bank of Swan Lake 
bears South 20° 51′ 58″ West, a distance of 
4,862.67 feet. 
(4) Thence, over and across said City of Texas 
City Survey and along the edge of fill adjacent to 
the easterly edge of said Texas City Turning Basin, 
the following eighteen (18) courses and distances: 
(A) North 01° 34′ 19″ East, a distance of 
57.40 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(B) North 05° 02′ 13″ West, a distance of 
161.85 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(C) North 06° 01′ 56″ East, a distance of 
297.75 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(D) North 06° 18′ 07″ West, a distance of 
71.33 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(E) North 07° 21′ 09″ West, a distance of 
122.45 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(F) North 26° 41′ 15″ West, a distance of 
46.02 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(G) North 01° 31′ 59″ West, a distance of 
219.78 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(H) North 15° 54′ 07″ West, a distance of 
104.89 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(I) North 04° 00′ 34″ East, a distance of 
72.94 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(J) North 06° 46′ 38″ West, a distance of 
78.89 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(K) North 12° 07′ 59″ West, a distance of 
182.79 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(L) North 20° 50′ 47″ West, a distance of 
105.74 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(M) North 02° 02′ 04″ West, a distance of 
184.50 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(N) North 08° 07′ 11″ East, a distance of 
102.23 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(O) North 08° 16′ 00″ West, a distance of 
213.45 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(P) North 03° 15′ 16″ West, a distance of 
336.45 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the left. 
(Q) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the left having a radius of 896.08 feet, 
a central angle of 14° 00′ 05″, a chord of North 
09° 36′ 03″ West – 218.43 feet, and an arc 
length of 218.97 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the right. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(R) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 483.33 
feet, a central angle of 19° 13′ 34″, a chord of 
North 13° 52′ 03″ East – 161.43 feet, and an 
arc length of 162.18 feet to a point for the 
northwesterly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
(5) Thence, continuing over and across said 
City of Texas City Survey, and along the edge of fill 
along said Galveston Bay, the following fifteen (15) 
courses and distances: 
(A) North 30° 45′ 02″ East, a distance of 
189.03 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(B) North 34° 20′ 49″ East, a distance of 
174.16 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the right. 
(C) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 202.01 
feet, a central angle of 25° 53′ 37″, a chord of 
North 33° 14′ 58″ East – 90.52 feet, and an 
arc length of 91.29 feet to a point for the be-
ginning of a non-tangent curve to the left. 
(D) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the left having a radius of 463.30 feet, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
a central angle of 23° 23′ 57″, a chord of North 
48° 02′ 53″ East – 187.90 feet, and an arc 
length of 189.21 feet to a point for the begin-
ning of a non-tangent curve to the right. 
(E) Northeasterly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 768.99 
feet, a central angle of 16° 24′ 19″, a chord of 
North 43° 01′ 40″ East – 219.43 feet, and an 
arc length of 220.18 feet to an angle point of 
the tract herein described. 
(F) North 38° 56′ 50″ East, a distance of 
126.41 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(G) North 42° 59′ 50″ East, a distance of 
128.28 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the right. 
(H) Northerly along said non-tangent 
curve to the right having a radius of 151.96 
feet, a central angle of 68° 36′ 31″, a chord of 
North 57° 59′ 42″ East – 171.29 feet, and an 
arc length of 181.96 feet to a point for the 
most northerly corner of the tract herein de-
scribed. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
(I) South 77° 14′ 49″ East, a distance of 
131.60 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(J) South 84° 44′ 18″ East, a distance of 
86.58 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(K) South 58° 14′ 45″ East, a distance of 
69.62 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(L) South 49° 44′ 51″ East, a distance of 
149.00 feet to an angle point of the tract herein 
described. 
(M) South 44° 47′ 21″ East, a distance of 
353.77 feet to a point for the beginning of a 
non-tangent curve to the left. 
(N) Easterly along said non-tangent curve 
to the left having a radius of 253.99 feet, a 
central angle of 98° 53′ 23″, a chord of South 
83° 28′ 51″ East – 385.96 feet, and an arc 
length of 438.38 feet to an angle point of the 
tract herein described. 
(O) South 75° 49′ 13″ East, a distance of 
321.52 feet to the point of beginning and con-
taining 393.53 acres (17,142,111 square feet) 
of land. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The following projects for water resources develop-
ment and conservation and other purposes, as identified 
in the reports titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water 
Resources Development’’ submitted to Congress on Janu-
ary 29, 2015, and January 29, 2016, respectively, pursu-
ant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise 
reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by 
the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, 
and subject to the conditions, described in the respective 
reports designated in this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. TX 
Brazos Island 
Harbor 
Nov. 3, 2014 
Federal: $116,116,000 
Non-Federal: $88,471,000 
Total: $204,587,000 
2. LA 
Calcasieu Lock 
Dec. 2, 2014 
Total: $16,700,000 (to be de-
rived 1⁄2 from the general 
fund of the Treasury and 
1⁄2 from the Inland Water-
ways Trust Fund) 
3. NH, 
ME 
Portsmouth Har-
bor and 
Piscataqua 
River 
Feb. 8, 2015 
Federal: $15,580,000 
Non-Federal: $5,190,000 
Total: $20,770,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
4. FL 
Port Everglades 
Jun. 25, 
2015 
Federal: $220,200,000 
Non-Federal: $102,500,000 
Total: $322,700,000 
5. AK 
Little Diomede 
Harbor 
Aug. 10, 
2015 
Federal: $26,015,000 
Non-Federal: $2,945,000 
Total: $28,960,000 
6. SC 
Charleston Har-
bor 
Sep. 8, 2015 
Federal: $224,300,000 
Non-Federal: $269,000,000 
Total: $493,300,000 
7. AK 
Craig Harbor 
March 16, 
2016 
Federal: $29,062,000 
Non-Federal: $3,255,000 
Total: $32,317,000. 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. TX 
Leon Creek Wa-
tershed 
Jun. 30, 
2014 
Federal: $18,314,000 
Non-Federal: $9,861,000 
Total: $28,175,000 
2. MO, 
KS 
Armourdale and 
Central Indus-
trial District 
Levee Units, 
Missouri River 
and Tributaries 
at Kansas Citys 
Jan. 27, 
2015 
Federal: $207,036,000 
Non-Federal: $111,481,000 
Total: $318,517,000 
3. KS 
City of Manhattan 
Apr. 30, 
2015 
Federal: $15,440,100 
Non-Federal: $8,313,900 
Total: $23,754,000 
4. TN 
Mill Creek 
Oct. 16, 
2015 
Federal: $17,759,000 
Non-Federal: $10,745,000 
Total: $28,504,000 
5. KS 
Upper Turkey 
Creek Basin 
Dec. 22, 
2015 
Federal: $24,584,000 
Non-Federal: $13,238,000 
Total: $37,822,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
6. NC 
Princeville 
Feb. 23, 
2016 
Federal: $14,001,000 
Non-Federal: $7,539,000 
Total: $21,540,000 
7. CA 
American River 
Common Fea-
tures 
Apr. 26, 
2016 
Federal: $876,478,000 
Non-Federal: $689,272,000 
Total: $1,565,750,000 
8. CA 
West Sacramento 
Apr. 26, 
2016 
Federal: $776,517,000 
Non-Federal: $414,011,000 
Total: $1,190,528,000. 
(3) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated Initial 
Costs and 
Estimated 
Renourishment 
Costs 
1. SC 
Colleton County 
Sep. 5, 2014 
Initial Federal: $13,733,850 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$7,395,150 
Initial Total: $21,129,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$16,371,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$16,371,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$32,742,000 
2. FL 
Flagler County 
Dec. 23, 
2014 
Initial Federal: $9,218,300 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$4,963,700 
Initial Total: $14,182,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$15,390,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$15,390,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$30,780,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:05 May 24, 2016
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5303.IH
H5303
emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS