H. R. 2401—307
Annex, and any other unmanned delivery system of similar
capability, as well as the specially designed production facilities
for these systems’’.
(6) There is strong evidence that emerging national space
launch programs in the Third World are not economically
viable.
(7) The United States has been successful in dissuading
other countries from pursuing space launch vehicle programs
in part by offering to cooperate with those countries in other
areas of space science and technology.
(8) The United States has successfully dissuaded other
MTCR adherents, and countries who have agreed to abide
by MTCR guidelines, from providing assistance to emerging
national space launch programs in the Third World.
(b) STRICT INTERPRETATION OF MTCR.—The Congress supports
the strict interpretation by the United States of the Missile Tech-
nology Control Regime concerning—
(1) the inability to distinguish space launch vehicle tech-
nology from missile technology under the regime; and
(2) the inability to safeguard space launch vehicle tech-
nology in a manner that would provide timely warning of
the diversion of such technology to military purposes.
(c) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that
the United States Government and the governments of other nations
adhering to the Missile Technology Control Regime should be recog-
nized by the international community for—
(1) the success of those governments in restricting the
export of space launch vehicle technology and of missile tech-
nology; and
(2) the significant contribution made by the imposition
of such restrictions to reducing the proliferation of missile
technology capable of being used to deliver weapons of mass
destruction.
(d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Missile
Technology Control Regime’’ or ‘‘MTCR’’ means the policy statement,
between the United States, the United Kingdom, the Federal Repub-
lic of Germany, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan, announced on
April 16, 1987, to restrict sensitive missile-relevant transfers based
on the MTCR Annex, and any amendments thereto.
TITLE XVII—CHEMICAL AND
BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS DEFENSE
SEC. 1701. CONDUCT OF THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
(a) GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the
chemical and biological defense program of the United States in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
(b) MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT.—In carrying out his respon-
sibilities under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall do the
following:
(1) Assign responsibility for overall coordination and
integration of the chemical and biological warfare defense pro-
gram and the chemical and biological medical defense program
to a single office within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00307
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—308
(2) Take those actions necessary to ensure close and
continuous coordination between (A) the chemical and biological
warfare defense program, and (B) the chemical and biological
medical defense program.
(3) Exercise oversight over the chemical and biological
defense program through the Defense Acquisition Board
process.
(c) COORDINATION OF THE PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense
shall designate the Army as executive agent for the Department
of Defense to coordinate and integrate research, development, test,
and evaluation, and acquisition, requirements of the military
departments for chemical and biological warfare defense programs
of the Department of Defense.
(d) FUNDING.—(1) The budget for the Department of Defense
for each fiscal year after fiscal year 1994 shall reflect a coordinated
and integrated chemical and biological defense program for the
military departments.
(2) Funding requests for the program shall be set forth in
the budget of the Department of Defense for each fiscal year as
a separate account, with a single program element for each of
the categories of research, development, test, and evaluation,
acquisition, and military construction. Amounts for military
construction projects may be set forth in the annual military
construction budget. Funds for military construction for the program
in the military construction budget shall be set forth separately
from other funds for military construction projects. Funding
requests for the program may not be included in the budget accounts
of the military departments.
(3) All funding requirements for the chemical and biological
defense program shall be reviewed by the Secretary of the Army
as executive agent pursuant to subsection (c).
(e) MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND REPORT.—(1) The Secretary of
Defense shall conduct a review of the management structure of
the Department of Defense chemical and biological warfare defense
program, including—
(A) research, development, test, and evaluation;
(B) procurement;
(C) doctrine development;
(D) policy;
(E) training;
(F) development of requirements;
(G) readiness; and
(H) risk assessment.
(2) Not later than May 1, 1994, the Secretary shall submit
to Congress a report that describes the details of measures being
taken to improve joint coordination and oversight of the program
and ensure a coherent and effective approach to its management.
SEC. 1702. CONSOLIDATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE
TRAINING ACTIVITIES.
The Secretary of Defense shall consolidate all chemical and
biological warfare defense training activities of the Department
of Defense at the United States Army Chemical School.
SEC. 1703. ANNUAL REPORT ON CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WAR-
FARE DEFENSE.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall include
in the annual report of the Secretary under section 113(c) of title
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00308
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—309
10, United States Code, a report on chemical and biological warfare
defense. The report shall assess—
(1) the overall readiness of the Armed Forces to fight
in a chemical-biological warfare environment and shall describe
steps taken and planned to be taken to improve such readiness;
and
(2) requirements for the chemical and biological warfare
defense program, including requirements for training, detection,
and protective equipment, for medical prophylaxis, and for
treatment of casualties resulting from use of chemical or
biological weapons.
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report shall include
information on the following:
(1) The quantities, characteristics, and capabilities of
fielded chemical and biological defense equipment to meet war-
time and peacetime requirements for support of the Armed
Forces, including individual protective items.
(2) The status of research and development programs, and
acquisition programs, for required improvements in chemical
and biological defense equipment and medical treatment,
including an assessment of the ability of the Department of
Defense and the industrial base to meet those requirements.
(3) Measures taken to ensure the integration of require-
ments for chemical and biological defense equipment and mate-
rial among the Armed Forces.
(4) The status of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC)
warfare defense training and readiness among the Armed
Forces and measures being taken to include realistic nuclear,
biological, and chemical warfare simulations in war games,
battle simulations, and training exercises.
(5) Measures taken to improve overall management and
coordination of the chemical and biological defense program.
(6) Problems encountered in the chemical and biological
warfare defense program during the past year and rec-
ommended solutions to those problems for which additional
resources or actions by the Congress are required.
(7) A description of the chemical warfare defense prepara-
tions that have been and are being undertaken by the Depart-
ment of Defense to address needs which may arise under article
X of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
(8) A summary of other preparations undertaken by the
Department of Defense and the On-Site Inspection Agency to
prepare for and to assist in the implementation of the conven-
tion, including activities such as training for inspectors,
preparation of defense installations for inspections under the
convention using the Defense Treaty Inspection Readiness Pro-
gram, provision of chemical weapons detection equipment, and
assistance in the safe transportation, storage, and destruction
of chemical weapons in other signatory nations to the
convention.
SEC. 1704. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING FEDERAL EMERGENCY
PLANNING FOR RESPONSE TO TERRORIST THREATS.
It is the sense of Congress that the President should strengthen
Federal interagency emergency planning by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency and other appropriate Federal, State, and
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00309
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—310
local agencies for development of a capability for early detection
and warning of and response to—
(1) potential terrorist use of chemical or biological agents
or weapons; and
(2) emergencies or natural disasters involving industrial
chemicals or the widespread outbreak of disease.
SEC. 1705. AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO VACCINATION
PROGRAMS OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES.
(a) AGREEMENTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may
enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human
Services to provide support for vaccination programs of the Sec-
retary of Health and Human Services in the United States through
use of the excess peacetime biological weapons defense capability
of the Department of Defense.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 1994, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report on the feasibility of providing Department of Defense
support for vaccination programs under subsection (a) and shall
identify resource requirements that are not within the Department’s
capability.
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994’’.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the installations
and locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ...................
Fort Rucker ....................................
$42,650,000
Alaska ......................
Fort Wainwright ............................
$740,000
Fort Richardson .............................
$10,000,000
Arizona .....................
Fort Huachuca ...............................
$8,850,000
California .................
Fort Irwin .......................................
$5,900,000
Colorado ...................
Fort Carson ....................................
$4,050,000
Fitzsimons Medical Center ...........
$4,400,000
Georgia .....................
Fort Benning ..................................
$37,650,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00310
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—311
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Fort Stewart ..................................
$20,300,000
Fort Gillem .....................................
$2,600,000
Hawaii ......................
Schofield Barracks .........................
$18,600,000
Kansas .....................
Fort Riley .......................................
$14,642,000
Kentucky ..................
Fort Campbell ................................
$40,300,000
Fort Knox .......................................
$41,350,000
Maryland .................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ............
$21,700,000
Missouri ...................
Fort Leonard Wood .......................
$1,000,000
Nevada .....................
Hawthorne 
Army 
Ammunition
Plant .............................................
$11,700,000
New Jersey ..............
Fort Monmouth ..............................
$7,500,000
Picatinny Arsenal ..........................
$10,500,000
New Mexico .............
White Sands Missile Range ..........
$6,200,000
New York .................
Fort Drum ......................................
$2,950,000
United States Military Academy,
West Point ....................................
$13,800,000
North Carolina ........
Fort Bragg ......................................
$118,690,000
Oklahoma ................
Fort Sill ..........................................
$27,000,000
Pennsylvania ...........
Tobyhanna Army Depot ................
$750,000
South Carolina ........
Fort Jackson ..................................
$2,700,000
Texas ........................
Fort Bliss ........................................
$29,600,000
Fort Hood .......................................
$56,500,000
Fort Sam Houston .........................
$5,651,000
Utah .........................
Dugway Proving Ground ..............
$16,500,000
Tooele Army Depot ........................
$1,500,000
Virginia ....................
Fort Belvoir ....................................
$8,860,000
Fort Lee ..........................................
$32,600,000
Fort Myer .......................................
$6,800,000
Washington ..............
Fort Lewis ......................................
$14,200,000
CONUS Various ......
Classified Locations .......................
$1,852,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the location outside
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following
table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Kwajalein Atoll ...........
Kwajalein ....................................
$21,200,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00311
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—312
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire
family housing units (including land acquisition) at the installa-
tions, for the purposes, and in the amounts set forth in the following
table:
Army: Family Housing
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
California .........
Fort Irwin ............
220 units ..........
$25,000,000
Hawaii ..............
Schofield Bar-
racks ..................
348 units ..........
$52,000,000
Maryland .........
Fort Meade ..........
275 units ..........
$26,000,000
Nevada .............
Hawthorne Army
Ammunition
Plant .................
Demolition .......
$500,000
New York .........
U.S. Military
Academy, West
Point ..................
100 units ..........
$15,000,000
North Carolina
Fort Bragg ...........
224 units ..........
$18,000,000
Wisconsin .........
Fort McCoy ..........
16 units ............
$2,950,000
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural
and engineering services and construction design activities with
respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units
in an amount not to exceed $11,805,000.
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2104(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Army may
improve existing military family housing in an amount not to exceed
$77,630,000.
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1993, for
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount
of $2,378,919,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2101(a), $650,585,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2101(b), $21,200,000.
(3) For the construction of the Chemical Demilitarization
Facility, Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, authorized in section
2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00312
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—313
1758), section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–
190; 105 Stat. 1508), and section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division
B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2586), $95,300,000.
(4) For unspecified minor military construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$12,000,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code,
$109,441,000.
(6) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition of military family
housing and facilities, $228,885,000.
(B) For support of military family housing (including
the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United
States Code), $1,110,108,000 of which not more than
$268,139,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing
of military family housing worldwide.
(7) For the Homeowners Assistance Program as authorized
by section 2832 of title 10, United States Code, $151,400,000,
to remain available until expended.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section
2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to
be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2105. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
PROJECTS.
(a) FISCAL YEAR 1993 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.—(1) The table
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat.
2587) is amended by striking out the item relating to Tooele Army
Depot, Utah.
(2) Section 2105(a) of such Act (106 Stat. 2588) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$2,127,397,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$2,118,197,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$338,860,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$329,660,000’’.
(b) FISCAL YEAR 1992 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) Section
2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1508)
is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘NEW YORK’’, by striking out the
item relating to Seneca Army Depot; and
(B) under the heading ‘‘VIRGINIA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Vint Hill Farms Station.
(2) Section 2105(a) of such Act (105 Stat. 1511) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$2,576,674,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$2,571,974,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$718,829,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$714,129,000’’.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00313
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—314
SEC. 2106. CONSTRUCTION 
OF 
CHEMICAL 
MUNITIONS 
DISPOSAL
FACILITIES.
(a) LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION.—None of the amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a) may be obligated for the construction of a new chemical
munitions disposal facility at Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, until
the Secretary of Defense submits a certification described in sub-
section (b).
(b) CERTIFICATION.—A certification referred to in subsection
(a) is a certification submitted by the Secretary of Defense to
Congress that—
(1) the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System
has operated successfully for a period of six months, has met
all required environmental and safety standards, and has
proven to be operationally effective; and
(2) if the Secretary of the Army awards a construction
contract for the chemical munitions disposal facility at Anniston
Army Depot, Alabama, the Secretary of the Army will schedule
the award of a construction contract for a chemical munitions
disposal facility at another non-low-volume chemical weapons
storage site in the continental United States during the same
12-month period in which the construction contract for the
facility at the Anniston Army Depot is awarded.
TITLE XXII—NAVY
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the installations
and locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
California ................
Barstow Marine Corps Logistics
Base ..............................................
$8,690,000
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps
Air Station ....................................
$3,850,000
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps
Base ..............................................
$11,130,000
Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station
Annex ............................................
$4,630,000
Lemoore Naval Air Station ...........
$1,930,000
San Diego Naval Hospital ............
$2,700,000
San Diego Fleet Industrial Supply
Center ...........................................
$2,270,000
San Diego Marine Corps Recruit
Depot .............................................
$1,130,000
Twentynine Palms, Marine Corps
Air-Ground Combat Center .........
$7,900,000
Connecticut .............
New London Naval Submarine
Base ..............................................
$40,940,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00314
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—315
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
District of Columbia
Washington, Commandant, Naval
District ..........................................
$3,110,000
Naval Research Laboratory ..........
$2,380,000
Florida .....................
Jacksonville Naval Air Station ....
$14,420,000
Mayport Naval Station .................
$3,260,000
Pensacola Naval Air Station ........
$6,420,000
Georgia ....................
Albany Marine Corps Logistics
Base ..............................................
$940,000
Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base
$10,920,000
Kings Bay Trident Training Facil-
ity ..................................................
$3,870,000
Hawaii .....................
Barbers Point Naval Air Station ..
$2,700,000
Honolulu, Naval Communications
and Telecommunications Area
Master Station, Eastern Pacific ..
$9,120,000
Pearl Harbor Naval Inactive Ship
Maintenance Facility ...................
$2,620,000
Pearl Harbor Naval Submarine
Base ..............................................
$54,140,000
Pearl Harbor Public Works Cen-
ter ..................................................
$27,540,000
Pearl 
Harbor, 
Commander,
Oceanographic System Pacific,
Berthing Pier ................................
$16,780,000
Indiana ....................
Crane Naval Surface Warfare
Center ...........................................
$9,600,000
Maine ......................
Kittery Portsmouth Naval Ship-
yard ...............................................
$4,780,000
Maryland ................
Bethesda National Naval Medical
Center ...........................................
$3,090,000
Indian 
Head, 
Naval 
Surface
Weapons Center ...........................
$3,400,000
Patuxent River Naval Air War-
fare Center ...................................
$9,300,000
Mississippi ..............
Gulfport Naval Construction Bat-
talion Center ................................
$4,400,000
Nevada ....................
Fallon Naval Air Station ..............
$1,600,000
New Jersey .............
Earle Naval Weapons Station ......
$2,580,000
North Carolina .......
Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base
$41,290,000
Camp Lejeune Naval Hospital .....
$2,370,000
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air
Station ..........................................
$7,500,000
Pennsylvania ..........
Philadelphia Aviation Supply Of-
fice .................................................
$1,900,000
Philadelphia Naval Inactive Ship
Maintenance Facility ...................
$8,660,000
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard .......
$13,500,000
Rhode Island ...........
Newport Naval Education and
Training Center ...........................
$11,300,000
South Carolina .......
Beaufort Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion ................................................
$10,900,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00315
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—316
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Charleston Naval Weapons Sta-
tion ................................................
$580,000
Tennessee ...............
Memphis Naval Air Station ..........
$1,450,000
Texas .......................
Corpus Christi Naval Air Station
$1,670,000
Virginia ...................
Chesapeake, Marine Corps Secu-
rity Battalion ................................
$5,380,000
Craney Island Fleet and Indus-
trial Supply Center Annex ..........
$11,740,000
Norfolk, Commander, Operational
Test and Evaluation Force ..........
$8,100,000
Norfolk Naval Air Station ............
$12,270,000
Norfolk Public Works Center .......
$5,330,000
Oceana Naval Air Station .............
$7,100,000
Portsmouth, Norfolk Naval Ship-
yard ...............................................
$13,420,000
Quantico, Combat Development
Command .....................................
$7,450,000
Wallops Island, Naval Surface
Weapons Center Detachment .....
$10,170,000
Washington .............
Bangor Naval Submarine Base ....
$3,100,000
Everett Naval Station ...................
$34,000,000
Keyport, Naval Undersea Warfare
Center Division ............................
$8,980,000
Various Locations ...
Wastewater Collection and Treat-
ment Facilities .............................
$3,260,000
Land Acquisition ...........................
$540,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the installations
and locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Guam .........................
Naval Hospital ...............................
$2,460,000
Anderson Air Force Base Naval
Air Facility ...................................
$7,310,000
Naval Station .................................
$14,520,000
Fleet/Industrial Supply Center ....
$21,200,000
Public Works Center .....................
$7,230,000
Italy ...........................
Naples Naval Support Activity ....
$11,740,000
Sigonella Naval Air Station ..........
$3,460,000
Spain .........................
Rota Naval Station ........................
$2,670,000
Various Locations .....
Host Nation Infrastructure Sup-
port ................................................
$2,960,000
Land Acquisition ...........................
$800,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00316
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—318
improve existing military family housing units in the amount of
$183,135,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1993, for
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of
$1,858,505,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2201(a), $514,100,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2201(b), $74,350,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects authorized
by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $5,500,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code,
$64,373,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition of military family
housing and facilities, $370,208,000.
(B) For support of military housing (including functions
described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code),
$819,974,000, of which not more than $113,308,000 may
be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family
housing units worldwide.
(6) For the construction of the large anachoic chamber
facility at the Patuxent River Naval Warfare Center, Aircraft
Division, Maryland, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Pub-
lic Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2590), $10,000,000.
(b) LIMITATION OF TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section
2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to
be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2205. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
PROJECTS.
(a) FISCAL YEAR 1993 CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS.—(1) The table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B
of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2589) is amended by striking
out the items relating to the following installations:
(A) Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California.
(B) Miramar Naval Air Station, California.
(C) Cecil Field, Naval Air Station, Florida.
(D) Memphis, Naval Air Station, Tennessee.
(2) Section 2204(a) of such Act (106 Stat. 2592) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,450,529,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$1,411,616,000’’;
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$312,557,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$274,897,000’’; and
(C) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking out ‘‘$661,246,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$659,993,000’’.
(b) FISCAL YEAR 1992 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) Section
2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00318
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—319
Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1514)
is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘ALASKA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Adak, Naval Security Group Activity;
(B) under the heading ‘‘CALIFORNIA’’—
(i) by striking out the item relating to Concord, Naval
Weapons Station; and
(ii) by striking out the item relating to Vallejo, Mare
Island Naval Shipyard;
(C) under the heading ‘‘DISTRICT
OF
COLUMBIA’’, in the
item relating to Commandant Naval District Washington, by
striking out ‘‘$5,570,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$3,520,000’’;
(D) under the heading ‘‘FLORIDA’’—
(i) in the item relating to Orlando, Naval Training
Center, by striking out ‘‘$21,430,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$13,450,000’’; and
(ii) by striking out the item relating to Pensacola,
Naval Supply Center;
(E) under the heading ‘‘GEORGIA’’, in the item relating
to Kings Bay, Naval Submarine Base, by striking out
‘‘$9,780,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$580,000’’;
(F) under the heading ‘‘MARYLAND’’, in the item relating
to Annapolis, Naval Radio Transmitting Facility, by striking
out ‘‘$5,220,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$2,820,000’’;
(G) under the heading ‘‘SOUTH CAROLINA’’, by striking out
the item relating to Charleston, Fleet and Mine Warfare Train-
ing Center;
(H) under the heading ‘‘VIRGINIA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Norfolk, Naval Station; and
(I) under the heading ‘‘WASHINGTON’’, in the item relating
to Whidbey Island, Naval Air Station, by striking out
‘‘$6,800,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$3,451,000’’.
(2) Section 2205(a) of such Act (105 Stat. 1518) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,832,149,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$1,759,990,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$739,859,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$667,700,000’’.
(c) FISCAL YEAR 1991 CONSTRUCTION
AND FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS.—(1) Section 2201(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law
101–510; 104 Stat. 1763) is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘ALASKA’’, in the item relating to
Amchitka, Fleet Surveillance Support Command, by striking
out ‘‘$31,000,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$25,344,000’’;
(B) under the heading ‘‘CALIFORNIA’’, by striking out the
item relating to Point Mugu, Pacific Missile Test Center;
(C) under the heading ‘‘FLORIDA’’, in the item relating
to Key West Naval Air Station, by striking out ‘‘$7,030,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$4,020,000’’; and
(D) under the heading ‘‘VIRGINIA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Oceana, Naval Air Station.
(2) Section 2202(a) of such Act (104 Stat. 1767) is amended
by striking out the item relating to Long Beach, Naval Station,
California.
(3) Section 2205(a) of such Act (104 Stat. 1767), as amended
by section 2209(a)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00319
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—320
Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105
Stat. 1520), is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,954,513,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$1,915,179,000’’;
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$900,092,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$885,686,000’’; and
(C) in paragraph (7)(A), by striking out ‘‘$174,827,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$149,899,000’’.
(d) FISCAL YEAR 1990 CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS; DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS.—(1) Section 2201(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and
1991 (division B of Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1621) is amended
under the heading ‘‘NEW YORK’’, in the item relating to New York,
Naval Station, by striking out ‘‘$25,640,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$20,978,000’’.
(2) Section 2202(a) of such Act (103 Stat. 1626) is amended
by striking out the item relating to El Toro, Marine Corps Air
Station, California.
(3) Section 2204(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (103 Stat. 1627), as amended
by section 2209(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105
Stat. 1521), is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,939,375,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$1,917,613,000’’;
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$892,561,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$883,237,000’’;
(C) in paragraph (5), by striking out ‘‘$5,810,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$2,810,000’’; and
(D) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking out ‘‘$191,290,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$177,190,000’’.
(e) FISCAL YEAR 1989 PROJECT.—(1) Section 2202(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act, 1989 (division B of Public
Law 100–456; 102 Stat. 2098), is amended in the item relating
to Naval Station, Long Beach, California, by striking out
‘‘$26,110,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$17,038,000’’.
(2) Section 2205(a) of such Act (102 Stat. 2099), as amended
by section 2206(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat.
2593), is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$2,361,555,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$2,352,483,000’’;
(B) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking out ‘‘$250,770,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$241,698,000’’.
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the installations
and locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00320
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—321
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ....................
Gunter Air Force Base Annex ........
$4,680,000
Maxwell Air Force Base ..................
$16,170,000
Alaska .......................
Eielson Air Force Base ....................
$13,300,000
Elmendorf Air Force Base ..............
$33,305,000
Cape Roman Air Force Station ......
$3,350,000
Fort Richardson ...............................
$5,500,000
Arizona ......................
Davis Monthan Air Force Base ......
$6,150,000
Luke Air Force Base .......................
$12,750,000
Navajo Army Depot .........................
$7,250,000
Arkansas ...................
Little Rock Air Force Base .............
$4,500,000
California ..................
Beale Air Force Base .......................
$3,150,000
Edwards Air Force Base .................
$11,300,000
McClellan Air Force Base ...............
$10,200,000
Travis Air Force Base .....................
$19,140,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base ............
$20,728,000
Colorado ....................
Buckley Air National Guard Base .
$39,000,000
Cheyenne 
Mountain 
Air 
Force
Base ..............................................
$4,450,000
Peterson Air Force Base .................
$21,030,000
United States Air Force Academy ..
$11,680,000
Delaware ...................
Dover Air Force Base ......................
$7,760,000
District of Columbia .
Bolling Air Force Base ....................
$2,000,000
Florida .......................
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station .
$19,200,000
Eglin Air Force Base .......................
$12,050,000
Eglin Auxiliary Field No. 9 ............
$7,829,000
Patrick Air Force Base ....................
$3,850,000
Tyndall Air Force Base ...................
$2,600,000
Georgia ......................
Moody Air Force Base .....................
$13,700,000
Robins Air Force Base .....................
$43,370,000
Hawaii .......................
Hickam Air Force Base ...................
$13,800,000
Kaena Point .....................................
$7,350,000
Illinois .......................
Scott Air Force Base .......................
$7,450,000
Kansas ......................
McConnell Air Force Base ..............
$1,900,000
Louisiana ..................
Barksdale Air Force Base ...............
$13,860,000
Maryland ..................
Andrews Air Force Base .................
$17,990,000
Mississippi ................
Columbus Air Force Base ...............
$2,900,000
Keesler Air Force Base ...................
$8,710,000
Missouri ....................
Whiteman Air Force Base ..............
$36,388,000
Montana ....................
Malmstrom Air Force Base .............
$7,700,000
Nebraska ...................
Offutt Air Force Base ......................
$11,000,000
Nevada ......................
Nellis Air Force Base ......................
$10,100,000
New Mexico ..............
Cannon Air Force Base ...................
$11,915,000
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$11,100,000
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$35,061,000
North Carolina .........
Pope Air Force Base ........................
$8,600,000
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base ..
$5,380,000
North Dakota ...........
Grand Forks Air Force Base ..........
$16,050,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00321
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—322
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Minot Air Force Base ......................
$10,500,000
Ohio ...........................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ...
$44,680,000
Oklahoma .................
Altus Air Force Base .......................
$7,710,000
Tinker Air Force Base .....................
$20,749,000
Vance Air Force Base ......................
$11,000,000
South Carolina .........
Charleston Air Force Base ..............
$1,100,000
Shaw Air Force Base .......................
$5,870,000
South Dakota ............
Ellsworth Air Force Base ................
$6,830,000
Tennessee .................
Arnold Air Force Base .....................
$1,500,000
Texas .........................
Brooks Air Force Base ....................
$8,400,000
Dyess Air Force Base ......................
$15,590,000
Goodfellow Air Force Base ..............
$3,700,000
Kelly Air Force Base .......................
$27,481,000
Lackland Air Force Base ................
$30,093,000
Laughlin Air Force Base .................
$8,650,000
Randolph Air Force Base ................
$5,300,000
Reese Air Force Base ......................
$900,000
Sheppard Air Force Base ................
$18,030,000
Utah ..........................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$14,580,000
Virginia .....................
Langley Air Force Base ...................
$12,450,000
Washington ...............
Fairchild Air Force Base .................
$3,500,000
McChord Air Force Base .................
$10,900,000
Wyoming ...................
F.E. Warren Air Force Base ...........
$12,640,000
Various Locations .....
Classified ..........................................
$8,140,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2304(a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and may carry out military construction projects for the installations
and locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Air Force: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Antigua Island ..........
Antigua Air Station .........................
$1,000,000
Ascension Island ......
Ascension Auxiliary Air Field ........
$3,400,000
Germany ...................
Ramstein Air Base ..........................
$3,100,000
Greenland .................
Thule Air Base .................................
$5,492,000
Indian Ocean ............
Diego Garcia Air Base .....................
$2,260,000
Turkey .......................
Incirlik Air Base ..............................
$2,400,000
United Kingdom .......
RAF Mildenhall ...............................
$4,800,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00322
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—324
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2304(a)(8)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force
may improve existing military family housing units in an amount
not to exceed $75,070,000.
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1993, for
military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total amount
of $2,040,031,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2301(a), $877,539,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2301(b), $22,452,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects authorized
by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $6,844,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code,
$63,180,000.
(5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for
construction of defense access roads under section 210 of title
23, United States Code, $7,150,000.
(6) For the balance of the amount authorized under section
2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat.
2594) for the construction of the climatic test chamber at Eglin
Air Force Base, Florida, $37,000,000.
(7) For phase II of the relocation and construction of up
to 1,068 family housing units at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois,
authorized by section 2302(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484;
106 Stat. 2596), $10,000,000.
(8) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition of military family
housing and facilities, $177,035,000.
(B) For support of military housing (including functions
described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code),
$838,831,000 of which not more than $118,266,000 may
be obligated or expended for leasing of military family
housing units worldwide.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section
2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to
be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
SEC. 2305. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
PROJECTS.
(a) FISCAL YEAR 1993 CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS.—(1) The table in section 2302(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B
of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2595) is amended by striking
out the item relating to March Air Force Base, California.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00324
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—325
(2) Section 2303 of such Act (106 Stat. 2596) is amended by
striking 
out 
‘‘$150,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$139,649,000’’.
(3) Section 2304(a) of such Act (106 Stat. 2596) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$2,062,707,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$2,014,005,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (5)(A), by striking out ‘‘$283,786,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$235,084,000’’.
(b) FISCAL YEAR 1992 CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS.—(1) Section 2301(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law
102–190; 105 Stat. 1521) is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘FLORIDA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Homestead Air Force Base; and
(B) under the heading ‘‘NEW YORK’’—
(i) in the item relating to Griffiss Air Force Base,
by striking out ‘‘$2,700,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$1,200,000’’; and
(ii) in the item relating to Plattsburgh Air Force Base,
by striking out ‘‘$9,040,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$960,000.’’.
(2) Section 2303 of such Act (105 Stat. 1525) is amended by
striking 
out 
‘‘$141,236,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$134,836,000’’.
(3) Section 2305(a) of such Act (105 Stat. 1525), as amended
by section 2308(a)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106
Stat. 2598), is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$2,054,713,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$2,033,833,000’’;
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$744,380,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$729,900,000’’; and
(C) in paragraph (8)(A), by striking out ‘‘$161,538,000’’
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$155,138,000’’.
(c) FISCAL YEAR 1991 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) Section
2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1769)
is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘CALIFORNIA’’, by striking out the
item relating to March Air Force Base;
(B) under the heading ‘‘FLORIDA’’—
(i) by striking out the item relating to Avon Park
Range; and
(ii) in the item relating to Homestead Air Force Base,
by striking out ‘‘$7,900,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$2,400,000’’;
(C) under the heading ‘‘IDAHO’’, by striking out the item
relating to Mountain Home Air Force Base;
(D) under the heading ‘‘MAINE’’, by striking out the item
relating to Bangor Air National Guard Base; and
(E) under the heading ‘‘NEW YORK’’, by striking out the
item relating to Griffiss Air Force Base.
(2) Section 2304(a) of such Act (104 Stat. 1773), as amended
by section 2308(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106
Stat. 2598) and section 2310(a)(2) of the Military Construction
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00325
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—326
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law
102–190; 105 Stat. 1527), is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,905,075,000’’ and inserting in lieu
thereof ‘‘$1,891,005,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘$724,855,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$710,785,000’’.
(d) FISCAL YEAR 1990 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) Section
2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Years 1990 and 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat.
1630) is amended—
(A) under the heading ‘‘FLORIDA’’, by striking out the item
relating to Homestead Air Force Base; and
(B) under the heading ‘‘OHIO’’, in the item relating to New-
ark Air Force Base, by striking out ‘‘$2,980,000’’ and inserting
in lieu thereof ‘‘$2,300,000’’.
(2) Section 2304(a) of such Act (103 Stat. 1636), as amended
by section 2310(b)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105
Stat. 1528) and section 2306(b) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law
101–510; 104 Stat. 1774) is amended—
(A) by striking out ‘‘the total amount’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘as follows:’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘the total
amount of $2,057,118,000, as follows:’’; and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘section 2301(a)’’ and
all that follows through the period and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘section 2301(a), $809,316,000’’.
SEC. 2306. RELOCATION OF AIR FORCE ACTIVITIES FROM SIERRA
ARMY DEPOT, CALIFORNIA, TO BEALE AIR FORCE BASE,
CALIFORNIA.
(a) STUDENT DORMITORY.—Section 2301(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B
of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1769) is amended in the matter
under the heading ‘‘CALIFORNIA’’—
(1) by striking out ‘‘Sierra Army Depot, $3,650,000.’’; and
(2) by striking out ‘‘Beale Air Force Base, $6,300,000.’’
and inserting in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘Beale Air Force
Base, $9,950,000.’’.
(b) MUNITION MAINTENANCE FACILITY.—Section 2301(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1521) is amended in
the matter under the heading ‘‘CALIFORNIA’’—
(1) by striking out ‘‘Sierra Army Depot, $2,700,000.’’; and
(2) by striking out ‘‘Beale Air Force Base, $2,250,000.’’
and inserting in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘Beale Air Force
Base, $4,950,000.’’.
SEC. 2307. COMBAT ARMS TRAINING AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY
RELOCATION FROM WHEELER AIR FORCE BASE, HAWAII,
TO UNITED STATES ARMY SCHOFIELD BARRACKS OPEN
RANGE, HAWAII.
Section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat.
1770) is amended in the matter under the heading ‘‘HAWAII’’—
(1) by striking out ‘‘Wheeler Air Force Base, $3,500,000.’’
and inserting in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘Wheeler Air Force
Base, $2,100,000.’’; and
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00326
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—327
(2) by inserting after the item relating to Hickam Air
Force Base the following new item:
‘‘United 
States 
Army 
Schofield 
Barracks 
Open 
Range,
$1,400,000.’’.
SEC. 2308. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS AS PART OF THE
IMPROVEMENT OF DYSART CHANNEL, LUKE AIR FORCE
BASE, ARIZONA.
(a) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Air Force may
transfer to the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Arizona
(in this section referred to as the ‘‘District’’), funds appropriated
for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1993, for a project,
authorized in section 2301(a), to widen and make other improve-
ments to Dysart Channel. Such improvements may include the
construction of necessary detention basins and other features that
are needed to prevent flooding of Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.
(b) USE OF FUNDS.—All funds transferred pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall be used by the District only for the purpose of
conducting the project described in such subsection.
(c) CONDITIONS ON TRANSFER.—Funds may not be transferred
pursuant to subsection (a) until after the date on which the Sec-
retary and the District enter into an agreement that addresses
cost sharing for the widening and other improvements to be made
to Dysart Channel and such other matters associated with the
project as the Secretary considers to be appropriate.
(d) LIMITATION ON AIR FORCE COST SHARE.—The Air Force
share of the costs of the project described in subsection (a) may
not exceed the lesser of—
(1) 50 percent of the total project cost; or
(2) $6,000,000.
(e) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the financial assist-
ance provided pursuant to subsection (a), the District shall convey
to the United States all right, title, and interest of the District
in and to the real property, if any, acquired by the District in
widening Dysart Channel and making the other improvements,
such as detention basins as referred to in subsection (a).
SEC. 2309. AUTHORITY 
TO 
TRANSFER 
FUNDS 
FOR 
SCHOOL
CONSTRUCTION FOR LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS.
(a) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may transfer to the Lackland Independent
School District, Texas, not more than $8,000,000 of the funds appro-
priated by the Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub-
lic Law 102–380; 106 Stat. 1366), pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2304(a)(1) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law
102–484; 106 Stat. 2596) for military construction relating to
Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, as authorized in section 2301(a)
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993.
(b) USE OF FUNDS.—All funds transferred pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall be used by the Lackland Independent School Dis-
trict to pay for the design and construction of a new secondary
school, the renovation of an elementary school, and the design
and construction of a new kindergarten and special education
facility.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00327
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—328
SEC. 2310. TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FAMILY
HOUSING, SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS.
(a) TRANSFER REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall
transfer to the County of St. Clair, Illinois (in this section referred
to as the ‘‘County’’), all funds made available for the construction
of military family housing at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, as
authorized in section 2302(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law
102–484; 106 Stat. 2595).
(b) USE OF FUNDS.—All funds transferred pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall be used by the County for the construction, at
a location acceptable to the Secretary, of a family housing complex
to replace the Cardinal Creek Housing Complex at Scott Air Force
Base.
SEC. 2311. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN FAM-
ILY HOUSING, RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS.
Section 2303(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1635)
is amended in the item relating to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas,
by striking out ‘‘$78,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$95,000’’.
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a)(1)
and, in the case of the project described in section 2403(b)(2),
other amounts appropriated pursuant to authorizations enacted
after this Act for that project, the Secretary of Defense may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations and locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
Agency
Installation or location
Amount
Defense Logistics
Agency ....................
Defense Reutilization and Market-
ing Office, Fairbanks, Alaska .....
$6,500,000
Defense Reutilization and Market-
ing Office, March Air Force
Base, California ...........................
$630,000
Defense Fuel Support Point, Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii ............................
$2,250,000
Defense Construction Supply Cen-
ter, Columbia, Ohio .....................
$3,100,000
Defense Reutilization and Market-
ing Office, Hill Air Force Base,
Utah ..............................................
$1,700,000
Defense General Supply Center,
Richmond, Virginia ......................
$17,000,000
Fort Belvoir, Virginia .....................
$5,200,000
Defense Medical Fa-
cility Office .............
Cannon Air Force Base, New Mex-
ico ..................................................
$13,600,000
Edwards Air Force Base, Califor-
nia .................................................
$1,700,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00328
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—331
(11) For architectural and engineering services and for
construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States
Code, $42,405,000.
(12) For energy conservation projects authorized by section
2402, $50,000,000.
(13) For base closure and realignment activities as author-
ized by title II of the Defense Authorization Amendments and
Base Closure and Realignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note), $12,830,000.
(14) For base closure and realignment activities as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C.
2687 note):
(A) For military installations approved for closure or
realignment in 1991, $1,526,310,000.
(B) For military installations approved for closure or
realignment in 1993, $1,144,000,000.
(15) For military family housing functions (including func-
tions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code),
$27,496,000, of which not more than $22,882,000 may be obli-
gated or expended for the leasing of military family housing
units worldwide.
(b) LIMITATION OF TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under
section 2401 of this Act may not exceed—
(1) the total amount authorized to be appropriated under
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a); and
(2) $17,720,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2401(a) for the construction of a supercomputer
facility at Fort Meade, Maryland).
SEC. 2404. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
PROJECTS.
(a) FISCAL
YEAR
1992 CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Section
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1528)
is amended by striking out the following items:
(1) Under the heading ‘‘DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY’’, the
item relating to Dayton Defense Electronics Supply Station,
Ohio.
(2) Under the heading ‘‘DEFENSE
MEDICAL
FACILITIES
OFFICE’’, the items relating to—
(A) Homestead Air Force Base, Florida; and
(B) Dallas Naval Air Station, Texas.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2404 of such Act (105
Stat. 1531) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking out ‘‘$1,680,940,000’’ and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘$1,665,440,000’’; and
(B) by striking out ‘‘$434,500,000’’ in paragraph (1)
and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$419,000,000’’; and
(2) in subsection (c)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ in paragraph (1) after the semi-
colon;
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00331
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—332
(B) by striking out ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph
(2) and inserting in lieu thereof a period; and
(C) by striking out paragraph (3).
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY
ORGANIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure Program as provided
in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount
not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated
for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction
previously financed by the United States.
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years
beginning after September 30, 1993, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States
Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure Program
as authorized by section 2501, in the amount of $140,000,000.
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE
FORCES FACILITIES
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED GUARD AND RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 1993, for the costs of acquisition, architec-
tural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for
the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under
chapter 133 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost
of acquisition of land for those facilities), the following amounts:
(1) For the Department of the Army—
(A) for the Army National Guard of the United States,
$283,483,000; and
(B) for the Army Reserve, $101,433,000.
(2) For the Department of the Navy, for the Naval and
Marine Corps Reserve, $25,013,000.
(3) For the Department of the Air Force—
(A) for the Air National Guard of the United States,
$236,341,000; and
(B) for the Air Force Reserve, $73,927,000.
SEC. 2602. REDUCTION IN AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED TO BE APPRO-
PRIATED 
FOR 
RESERVE 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.
(a) FISCAL YEAR 1993 AUTHORIZATIONS.—Section 2601 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2602) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking out ‘‘$17,200,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$10,700,000’’; and
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00332
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—333
(2) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking out ‘‘36,580,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘34,880,000’’.
(b) FISCAL YEAR 1992 AUTHORIZATION.—Section 2601(2) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1534) is amended by
striking 
out 
‘‘$56,900,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
in 
lieu 
thereof
‘‘$31,800,000’’.
(c) FISCAL YEAR 1991 AUTHORIZATIONS.—Section 2601 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1781) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking out ‘‘$80,307,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$78,667,000’’;
(2) in paragraph (3)(A), as amended by section 2602(a)(2)
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1535), by
striking out ‘‘$176,290,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$171,090,000’’; and
(3) in paragraph (3)(B), as amended by section 2602(a)(3)
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1535) and
section 2602(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1993 (division B of Public Law 102–484; 106
Stat. 2602), by striking out ‘‘(B)’’ and all that follows through
the period and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(B) for the Air Force
Reserve, $32,350,000’’.
(d) FISCAL YEAR 1990 AUTHORIZATIONS.—Section 2601 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and
1991 (division B of Public Law 101–189; 103 Stat. 1645) is
amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking out ‘‘$56,600,000’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$54,250,000’’; and
(2) in paragraph (3)(A), as amended by section 2602(b)(1)
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1535), by
striking out ‘‘$195,628,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
‘‘$195,088,000’’.
SEC. 2603. UNITED 
STATES 
ARMY 
RESERVE 
COMMAND 
HEAD-
QUARTERS FACILITY.
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZED.—Using amounts appropriated pursu-
ant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2601(1)(B),
and other amounts appropriated pursuant to authorizations enacted
after this Act for this project, the Secretary of the Army may
construct at Fort McPherson, Georgia, a headquarters facility for
the United States Army Reserve Command and may contract for
architectural and engineering services and construction design serv-
ices in connection with such construction project.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF PROJECT.—The cost of the
construction project authorized by subsection (a) may not exceed
$36,400,000.
(c) MULTIYEAR CONTRACT AUTHORIZED.—In order to carry out
the construction project authorized in subsection (a), the Secretary
may enter into a multiyear contract in advance of appropriations
therefor.
(d) FUNDING.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated
pursuant to section 2601(1)(B), $15,000,000 shall be available to
carry out the project authorized by subsection (a).
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00333
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—334
SEC. 2604. LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total amount of all projects carried out under
section 2601(1)(B) may not exceed the total amount authorized
to be appropriated under such section and $21,400,000 (the balance
of the amount authorized for the construction of a command head-
quarters facility at Fort McPherson, Georgia).
TITLE XXVII—EXPIRATION AND
EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 2701. EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS
REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.
(a) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.—
Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained
in titles XXI through XXVI for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions
to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure program
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the
later of—
(1) October 1, 1996; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 1997.
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization Infrastructure program (and authorizations
of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been
obligated before the later of—
(1) October 1, 1996; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for fiscal year 1997 for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure
program.
SEC. 2702. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL
YEAR 1991 PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2701(b) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division
B of Public Law 101–510, 104 Stat. 1782), authorizations for the
projects set forth in the tables in subsection (b), as provided in
section 2101, 2201, 2301, or 2401 of that Act and extended by
section 2702(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1992 (division B of Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat.
1535), shall remain in effect until October 1, 1994, or the date
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construc-
tion for fiscal year 1995, whichever is later.
(b) TABLES.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as
follows:
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00334
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—335
Army: Extension of 1991 Project Authorizations
State
Installation or lo-
cation
Project
Amount
Colorado ...........
Falcon Air Force
Base .....................
Satellite Control
Certification
Facility ............
$1,450,000
Missouri ...........
Fort Leonard Wood
Child Develop-
ment Center ....
$3,050,000
Virginia ............
Fort Myer ...............
Child Develop-
ment Center ....
$2,150,000
Navy: Extension of 1991 Project Authorization
State
Installation or lo-
cation
Project
Amount
Connecticut ......
New London Naval
Submarine Base .
Thames River
Dredging .........
$5,300,000
Air Force: Extension of 1991 Project Authorizations
State
Installation or lo-
cation
Project
Amount
Alaska ..............
Clear Air Force
Station .................
Alter Dormitory
(Phase II) ........
$5,000,000
King Salmon Air-
port ......................
Vehicle Refuel
Maintenance
Shop ................
$2,500,000
California .........
Sierra Army Depot
Dormitory ...........
$3,650,000
Colorado ...........
Buckley Air Na-
tional Guard
Base .....................
Child Develop-
ment Center ....
$4,550,000
United States Air
Force Academy ...
Consolidated
Education &
Training Facil-
ity ....................
$15,000,000
Hawaii ..............
Hickam Air Force
Base .....................
Dormitory ...........
$6,100,000
Wheeler Air Force
Base .....................
Combat Arms
Training &
Maintenance
Facility ............
$1,400,000
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00335
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—338
SEC. 2802. SALE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ALTERNATE ENERGY AND
COGENERATION PRODUCTION FACILITIES.
(a) AVAILABILITY
OF PROCEEDS
FOR CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Subsection (b) of section 2483 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(2) Subject to the availability of appropriations for this pur-
pose, proceeds credited under paragraph (1) may be used to carry
out military construction projects under the energy performance
plan developed by the Secretary of Defense under section 2865(a)
of this title, including minor military construction projects author-
ized under section 2805 of this title that are designed to increase
energy conservation.’’.
(b) NOTIFICATION REGARDING PROJECTS.—Such section is fur-
ther amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(c) Before carrying out a military construction project described
in subsection (b) using proceeds from sales under subsection (a),
the Secretary concerned shall notify Congress in writing of the
project, the justification for the project, and the estimated cost
of the project. The project may be carried out only after the end
of the 21-day period beginning on the date the notification is
received by Congress.’’.
SEC. 2803. AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY DEPARTMENTS TO PARTICI-
PATE IN WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS.
(a) AUTHORITY.—Subchapter III of chapter 169 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new section:
‘‘§ 2866. Water conservation at military installations
‘‘(a) WATER CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES.—(1) The Secretary of
Defense shall permit and encourage each military department,
Defense Agency, and other instrumentality of the Department of
Defense to participate in programs conducted by a utility for the
management of water demand or for water conservation.
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense may authorize a military installa-
tion to accept a financial incentive (including an agreement to
reduce the amount of a future water bill), goods, or services gen-
erally available from a utility, for the purpose of adopting tech-
nologies and practices that—
‘‘(A) relate to the management of water demand or to
water conservation; and
‘‘(B) as determined by the Secretary, are cost effective
for the Federal Government.
‘‘(3) Subject to paragraph (4), the Secretary of Defense may
authorize the Secretary of a military department having jurisdiction
over a military installation to enter into an agreement with a
utility to design and implement a cost-effective program that pro-
vides incentives for the management of water demand and for
water conservation and that addresses the requirements and cir-
cumstances of the installation. Activities under the program may
include the provision of water management services, the alteration
of a facility, and the installation and maintenance by the utility
of a water-saving device or technology.
‘‘(4)(A) If an agreement under paragraph (3) provides for a
utility to pay in advance the financing costs for the design or
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00338
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—339
implementation of a program referred to in that paragraph and
for such advance payment to be repayed by the United States,
the cost of such advance payment may be recovered by the utility
under terms that are not less favorable than the terms applicable
to the most favored customer of the utility.
‘‘(B) Subject to the availability of appropriations, a repayment
of an advance payment under subparagraph (A) shall be made
from funds available to a military department for the purchase
of utility services.
‘‘(C) An agreement under paragraph (3) shall provide that title
to a water-saving device or technology installed at a military
installation pursuant to the agreement shall vest in the United
States. Such title may vest at such time during the term of the
agreement, or upon expiration of the agreement, as determined
to be in the best interests of the United States.
‘‘(b) USE OF WATER COST SAVINGS.—Water cost savings realized
under this section shall be used as provided in section 2865(b)(2)
of this title.
‘‘(c) WATER CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) The
Secretary of Defense may carry out a military construction project
for water conservation, not previously authorized, using funds
appropriated or otherwise made available to the Secretary for water
conservation.
‘‘(2) When a decision is made to carry out a project under
paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees
on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and House
of Representatives of that decision. Such project may be carried
out only after the end of the 21-day period beginning on the date
the notification is received by such committees.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
‘‘2866. Water conservation at military installations.’’.
SEC. 2804. CLARIFICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) ENERGY EFFICIENT MAINTENANCE.—Subsection (a) of section
2865 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, including energy effi-
cient maintenance,’’ after ‘‘conservation measures’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(4) In paragraph (3), the term ‘energy efficient maintenance’
includes—
‘‘(A) the repair by replacement of equipment or systems,
such as lighting, heating, or cooling equipment or systems
or industrial processes, with technology that—
‘‘(i) will achieve the most cost-effective energy savings
over the life-cycle of the equipment or system being
repaired; and
‘‘(ii) will meet the same end needs as the equipment
or system being repaired; and
‘‘(B) improvements in an operation or maintenance process,
such as improved training or improved controls, that result
in reduced costs through energy savings’’.
(b) USE OF SAVINGS AND USE OF PROCEEDS FROM ELECTRICITY
SALES.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00339
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—340
(A) by striking out ‘‘The Secretary shall provide that
two-thirds’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘Two-thirds’’; and
(B) by striking out ‘‘for any fiscal year beginning after
fiscal year 1990’’; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking out ‘‘(2) The amount’’
and all that follows through ‘‘the Secretary of Defense.’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof the following:
‘‘(2) The Secretary shall provide that the amount that remains
available for obligation under paragraph (1) and section 2866(b)
of this title, and the funds made available under section 2483(b)(2)
of this title, shall be used as follows:
‘‘(A) One-half of the amount shall be used for the
implementation of additional energy conservation measures and
for water conservation activities at such buildings, facilities,
or installations of the Department of Defense as may be des-
ignated (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Sec-
retary of Defense) by the head of the department, agency,
or instrumentality that realized the savings referred to in para-
graph (1) or in section 2866(b) of this title.’’.
(c) COVERED UTILITIES.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section is
amended by adding before the period the following: ‘‘or by any
utility for water conservation activities’’.
SEC. 2805. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE EXISTING FACILITIES IN LIEU OF
CARRYING OUT CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED BY LAW.
(a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—(1) Subchapter I of chapter 169
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
the following:
‘‘§ 2813. Acquisition of existing facilities in lieu of authorized
construction
‘‘(a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—Using funds appropriated for
a military construction project authorized by law for a military
installation, the Secretary of the military department concerned
may acquire an existing facility (including the real property on
which the facility is located) at or near the military installation
instead of carrying out the authorized military construction project
if the Secretary determines that—
‘‘(1) the acquisition of the facility satisfies the requirements
of the military department concerned for the authorized mili-
tary construction project; and
‘‘(2) it is in the best interests of the United States to
acquire the facility instead of carrying out the authorized mili-
tary construction project.
‘‘(b) MODIFICATION OR CONVERSION OF ACQUIRED FACILITY.—
(1) As part of the acquisition of an existing facility under subsection
(a), the Secretary of the military department concerned may carry
out such modifications, repairs, or conversions of the facility as
the Secretary considers to be necessary so that the facility satisfies
the requirements for which the military construction project was
authorized.
‘‘(2) The costs of anticipated modifications, repairs, or conver-
sions under paragraph (1) are required to remain within the author-
ized amount of the military construction project. The Secretary
concerned shall consider such costs in determining whether the
acquisition of an existing facility is—
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00340
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06
H. R. 2401—341
‘‘(A) more cost effective than carrying out the authorized
military construction project; and
‘‘(B) in the best interests of the United States.
‘‘(c) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENTS.—A contract may not
be entered into for the acquisition of a facility under subsection
(a) until the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date the
Secretary concerned transmits to the Committees on Armed Services
and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and House
of Representatives a written notification of the determination to
acquire an existing facility instead of carrying out the authorized
military construction project. The notification shall include the rea-
sons for acquiring the facility.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I
of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘2813. Acquisition of existing facilities in lieu of authorized construction.’’.
(b) APPLICABILITY OF SECTION.—Section 2813 of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect
to military construction projects authorized on or after the date
of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2806. CLARIFICATION OF PARTICIPATION IN DEPARTMENT OF
STATE HOUSING POOLS.
Section 2834(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘(b) The maximum lease amounts specified in section 2828(e)(1)
of this title for the rental of family housing in foreign countries
shall not apply to housing made available to the Department of
Defense under this section. To the extent that the lease amount
for units of housing made available under this subsection exceeds
such maximum lease amounts, such units shall not be counted
in applying the limitation contained in such section on the number
of units of family housing for which the Secretary concerned may
waive such maximum lease amounts.’’.
SEC. 2807. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO LEASE REAL PROPERTY
FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES.
(a) EXTENSION
OF AUTHORITY.—Section 2680(d) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘September 30,
1993.’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1995.’’.
(b) EXTENSION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 2863(b)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992
and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2680 note) is amended
by striking out ‘‘March 1, 1993, and March 1, 1994,’’ and inserting
in lieu thereof ‘‘March 1 of each of the years 1994, 1995, and
1996,’’.
Subtitle B—Land Transactions Generally
SEC. 2811. LAND CONVEYANCE, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may
convey to Broward County, Florida (in this section referred to
as the ‘‘County’’), all right, title, and interest of the United States
in and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon,
consisting of approximately 18.45 acres and comprising a portion
of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Florida.
13:24 Nov 18, 1993
VerDate 16-NOV-93
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00341
Fmt 6655
Sfmt 6501
E:\BILLS\H2401.ENR
bend06