H. R. 2765—2 
courts, and foreign libel judgments inconsistent with United 
States first amendment protections are increasingly common. 
SEC. 3. RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DEFAMATION JUDGMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Part VI of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘CHAPTER 181—FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘4101. Definitions. 
‘‘4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments. 
‘‘4103. Removal. 
‘‘4104. Declaratory judgments. 
‘‘4105. Attorney’s fees. 
‘‘§ 4101. Definitions 
‘‘In this chapter: 
‘‘(1) DEFAMATION.—The term ‘defamation’ means any action 
or other proceeding for defamation, libel, slander, or similar 
claim alleging that forms of speech are false, have caused 
damage to reputation or emotional distress, have presented 
any person in a false light, or have resulted in criticism, dis-
honor, or condemnation of any person. 
‘‘(2) DOMESTIC COURT.—The term ‘domestic court’ means 
a Federal court or a court of any State. 
‘‘(3) FOREIGN COURT.—The term ‘foreign court’ means a 
court, administrative body, or other tribunal of a foreign 
country. 
‘‘(4) FOREIGN
JUDGMENT.—The term ‘foreign judgment’ 
means a final judgment rendered by a foreign court. 
‘‘(5) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means each of the several 
States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, terri-
tory, or possession of the United States. 
‘‘(6) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘United States per-
son’ means— 
‘‘(A) a United States citizen; 
‘‘(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi-
dence to the United States; 
‘‘(C) an alien lawfully residing in the United States 
at the time that the speech that is the subject of the 
foreign defamation action was researched, prepared, or 
disseminated; or 
‘‘(D) a business entity incorporated in, or with its pri-
mary location or place of operation in, the United States. 
‘‘§ 4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments 
‘‘(a) FIRST AMENDMENT CONSIDERATIONS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 
Federal or State law, a domestic court shall not recognize 
or enforce a foreign judgment for defamation unless the 
domestic court determines that— 
‘‘(A) the defamation law applied in the foreign court’s 
adjudication provided at least as much protection for 
freedom of speech and press in that case as would be 
provided by the first amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States and by the constitution and law of the 
State in which the domestic court is located; or
H. R. 2765—3 
‘‘(B) even if the defamation law applied in the foreign 
court’s adjudication did not provide as much protection 
for freedom of speech and press as the first amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States and the constitu-
tion and law of the State, the party opposing recognition 
or enforcement of that foreign judgment would have been 
found liable for defamation by a domestic court applying 
the first amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States and the constitution and law of the State in which 
the domestic court is located. 
‘‘(2) BURDEN OF ESTABLISHING APPLICATION OF DEFAMATION 
LAWS.—The party seeking recognition or enforcement of the 
foreign judgment shall bear the burden of making the showings 
required under subparagraph (A) or (B). 
‘‘(b) JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 
Federal or State law, a domestic court shall not recognize 
or enforce a foreign judgment for defamation unless the 
domestic court determines that the exercise of personal jurisdic-
tion by the foreign court comported with the due process 
requirements that are imposed on domestic courts by the Con-
stitution of the United States. 
‘‘(2) BURDEN OF ESTABLISHING EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION.— 
The party seeking recognition or enforcement of the foreign 
judgment shall bear the burden of making the showing that 
the foreign court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction comported 
with the due process requirements that are imposed on domestic 
courts by the Constitution of the United States. 
‘‘(c) JUDGMENT AGAINST PROVIDER OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER 
SERVICE.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 
Federal or State law, a domestic court shall not recognize 
or enforce a foreign judgment for defamation against the pro-
vider of an interactive computer service, as defined in section 
230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230) unless 
the domestic court determines that the judgment would be 
consistent with section 230 if the information that is the subject 
of such judgment had been provided in the United States. 
‘‘(2) BURDEN
OF
ESTABLISHING
CONSISTENCY
OF
JUDG-
MENT.—The party seeking recognition or enforcement of the 
foreign judgment shall bear the burden of establishing that 
the judgment is consistent with section 230. 
‘‘(d) APPEARANCES NOT
A BAR.—An appearance by a party 
in a foreign court rendering a foreign judgment to which this 
section applies shall not deprive such party of the right to oppose 
the recognition or enforcement of the judgment under this section, 
or represent a waiver of any jurisdictional claims. 
‘‘(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 
be construed to— 
‘‘(1) affect the enforceability of any foreign judgment other 
than a foreign judgment for defamation; or 
‘‘(2) limit the applicability of section 230 of the Communica-
tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230) to causes of action for defama-
tion.
H. R. 2765—4 
‘‘§ 4103. Removal 
‘‘In addition to removal allowed under section 1441, any action 
brought in a State domestic court to enforce a foreign judgment 
for defamation in which— 
‘‘(1) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State different from 
any defendant; 
‘‘(2) any plaintiff is a foreign state or a citizen or subject 
of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; 
or 
‘‘(3) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State and any defendant 
is a foreign state or citizen or subject of a foreign state, 
may be removed by any defendant to the district court of the 
United States for the district and division embracing the place 
where such action is pending without regard to the amount in 
controversy between the parties. 
‘‘§ 4104. Declaratory judgments 
‘‘(a) CAUSE OF ACTION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any United States person against whom 
a foreign judgment is entered on the basis of the content 
of any writing, utterance, or other speech by that person that 
has been published, may bring an action in district court, 
under section 2201(a), for a declaration that the foreign judg-
ment is repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United 
States. For the purposes of this paragraph, a judgment is 
repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United States 
if it would not be enforceable under section 4102 (a), (b), or 
(c). 
‘‘(2) BURDEN OF ESTABLISHING UNENFORCEABILITY OF JUDG-
MENT.—The party bringing an action under paragraph (1) shall 
bear the burden of establishing that the foreign judgment would 
not be enforceable under section 4102 (a), (b), or (c). 
‘‘(b) NATIONWIDE SERVICE OF PROCESS.—Where an action under 
this section is brought in a district court of the United States, 
process may be served in the judicial district where the case is 
brought or any other judicial district of the United States where 
the defendant may be found, resides, has an agent, or transacts 
business. 
‘‘§ 4105. Attorneys’ fees 
‘‘In any action brought in a domestic court to enforce a foreign 
judgment for defamation, including any such action removed from 
State court to Federal court, the domestic court shall, absent excep-
tional circumstances, allow the party opposing recognition or 
enforcement of the judgment a reasonable attorney’s fee if such 
party prevails in the action on a ground specified in section 4102 
(a), (b), or (c).’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the Sense of the Congress that 
for the purpose of pleading a cause of action for a declaratory 
judgment, a foreign judgment for defamation or any similar offense 
as described under chapter 181 of title 28, United States Code, 
(as added by this Act) shall constitute a case of actual controversy 
under section 2201(a) of title 28, United States Code.
H. R. 2765—5 
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of 
chapters for part VI of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘181. Foreign judgments ...................................................................................4101.’’. 
Speaker of the House of Representatives. 
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.