areas (excluding the Southwest Border high inten-
sity drug trafficking area) the Director determines 
to have the greatest impact on reducing overall drug 
traffic in the United States. 
‘‘(2) The Director shall expend no less than 25 
percent of the amounts appropriated under this sec-
tion in the nine high intensity drug trafficking areas 
(excluding the Southwest Border high intensity drug 
trafficking area) the Director determines to have the 
next greatest impact on reducing overall drug traffic 
in the United States; 
‘‘(3) The Director shall expend no less than 20 
percent of the amounts appropriated under this sec-
tion in the Southwest Border high intensity drug 
trafficking area. The executive committee of the 
Southwest Border high intensity drug trafficking 
area may reallocate up to five percent of the total 
funds allocated to that area among its components, 
with the approval of the Director. 
‘‘(4) The Director shall expend no less than 10 
percent of the amounts appropriated under this sec-
tion in the remaining high intensity drug trafficking 
areas. 
‘‘(5) In addition to the amounts allocated under 
paragraphs (1) through (4) of this subsection, the
Director may expend 15 percent of the amounts ap-
propriated under this section on a discretionary 
basis. In allocating funds under this paragraph, the 
Director shall consider the impact of activities fund-
ed on reducing overall drug traffic in the United 
States. 
‘‘(i) USE OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(1) LIMITATION.—No funds appropriated for 
the Program shall be expended for drug prevention 
or drug treatment programs. 
‘‘(2) LIMITATION
ON
APPLICABILITY.—Para-
graph (1) shall not apply with respect to the Balti-
more/Washington high intensity drug trafficking 
area. 
‘‘(j) TERRORISM ACTIVITIES.—The Director may au-
thorize high intensity drug trafficking areas to assist Fed-
eral, State, and local law enforcement agencies in inves-
tigations and activities related to terrorism and prevention 
of terrorism, especially but not exclusively where such in-
vestigations are related to drug trafficking. The Director 
shall ensure that assistance to such investigations remains 
incidental to the mission of high intensity drug trafficking 
areas to reduce drug availability and carry out drug-re-
lated law enforcement activities and that significant re-
sources of the high intensity drug trafficking areas pro-
gram are not redirected to activities exclusively related to 
terrorism. 
‘‘(k) BOARD REPRESENTATION.—None of the funds 
appropriated under this section may be expended in any 
high intensity drug trafficking area or for a partnership 
under the Program in which the executive board or equiva-
lent governing committee is not comprised of equal voting 
representation between representatives of Federal law en-
forcement agencies and representatives of State and local 
law enforcement agencies. 
‘‘(l) ROLE OF DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRA-
TION.—The Director in consultation with the Attorney 
General shall ensure that a representative of the Drug En-
forcement Administration is included in the Intelligence 
Support Center of each high intensity drug trafficking 
area. 
‘‘(m) MARIJUANA
ENFORCEMENT.—The Director 
may direct the reallocation of up to 5 percent of funds 
available for a fiscal year for the Program, from State and 
local law enforcement agencies to Federal law enforcement 
agencies to assist in enforcement of Federal law in high 
intensity drug trafficking areas containing States where 
State law permits the use of marijuana in a manner incon-
sistent with the Controlled Substances Act.
‘‘(n) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
is authorized to be appropriated to the Office of National 
Drug 
Control 
Policy 
to 
carry 
out 
this 
section, 
$230,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, $240,000,000 for fis-
cal years 2005 and 2006, and $250,000,000 for fiscal 
years 2007 and 2008. 
SEC. 7. FUNDING FOR CERTAIN HIGH INTENSITY DRUG 
TRAFFICKING AREAS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 
‘‘Dawson Family Community Protection Act’’. 
(b) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) In the early morning hours of October 16, 
2002, the home of Carnell and Angela Dawson was 
firebombed 
in 
apparent 
retaliation 
for 
Mrs. 
Dawson’s notification of police about persistent drug 
distribution activity in their East Baltimore City 
neighborhood. 
(2) The arson claimed the lives of Mr. and Mrs. 
Dawson and their 5 young children, aged 9 to 14. 
(3) The horrific murder of the Dawson family 
is a stark example of domestic narco-terrorism. 
(4) In all phases of counter-narcotics law en-
forcement—from prevention to investigation to pros-
ecution to reentry—the voluntary cooperation of or-
dinary citizens is a critical component.
(5) Voluntary cooperation is difficult for law en-
forcement officials to obtain when citizens feel that 
cooperation carries the risk of violent retaliation by 
illegal drug trafficking organizations and their affili-
ates. 
(6) Public confidence that law enforcement is 
doing all it can to make communities safe is a pre-
requisite for voluntary cooperation among people 
who may be subject to intimidation or reprisal (or 
both). 
(7) Witness protection programs are insufficient 
on their own to provide security because many indi-
viduals and families who strive every day to make 
distressed neighborhoods livable for their children, 
other relatives, and neighbors will resist or refuse of-
fers of relocation by local, State, and Federal pros-
ecutorial agencies and because, moreover, the contin-
ued presence of strong individuals and families is 
critical to preserving and strengthening the social 
fabric in such communities. 
(8) Where (as in certain sections of Baltimore 
City) interstate trafficking of illegal drugs has severe 
ancillary local consequences within areas designated 
as high intensity drug trafficking areas, it is impor-
tant that supplementary High Intensity Drug Traf-
ficking Areas Program funds be committed to sup-
port initiatives aimed at making the affected com-
munities safe for the residents of those communities 
and encouraging their cooperation with local, State, 
and Federal law enforcement efforts to combat ille-
gal drug trafficking. 
(c) FUNDING FOR CERTAIN HIGH INTENSITY DRUG 
TRAFFICKING AREAS.—Section 707 is further amended in 
subsection (i) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(3) SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—The Director shall 
ensure that, of the amounts appropriated for a fiscal 
year for the Program, at least $1,000,000 is used in 
high intensity drug trafficking areas with severe 
neighborhood safety and illegal drug distribution 
problems. The funds shall be used—
‘‘(A) to ensure the safety of neighborhoods 
and the protection of communities, including 
the prevention of the intimidation of potential 
witnesses of illegal drug distribution and related 
activities; and 
‘‘(B) to combat illegal drug trafficking 
through such methods as the Director considers 
appropriate, such as establishing or operating 
(or both) a toll-free telephone hotline for use by
‘‘(iv) data fusion, advanced computer 
systems, and artificial intelligence; and 
‘‘(v) chemical, biological, radiological 
(including neutron, electron, and graviton), 
and other means of detection; 
‘‘(B) identify demand reduction (including 
drug prevention) basic and applied research 
needs and initiatives, in consultation with af-
fected National Drug Control Program agen-
cies, including—
‘‘(i) improving treatment through 
neuroscientific advances; 
‘‘(ii) improving the transfer of bio-
medical research to the clinical setting; and 
‘‘(iii) in consultation with the Na-
tional Institute on Drug Abuse and the 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Serv-
ices Administration, and through inter-
agency agreements or grants, examining 
addiction and rehabilitation research and 
the application of technology to expanding 
the effectiveness or availability of drug 
treatment; 
‘‘(C) make a priority ranking of such needs 
identified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) accord-
ing to fiscal and technological feasibility, as 
part of a National Counter-Drug Enforcement 
Research and Development Program; 
‘‘(D) oversee and coordinate counter-drug 
technology initiatives with related activities of 
other Federal civilian and military departments; 
‘‘(E) oversee and coordinate a technology 
transfer program for the transfer of technology 
to State and local law enforcement agencies; 
and 
‘‘(F) pursuant to the authority of the Di-
rector of National Drug Control Policy under 
section 704, submit requests to Congress for 
the reprogramming or transfer of funds appro-
priated for counter-drug technology research 
and development. 
‘‘(2) PRIORITIES
IN
TRANSFERRING
TECH-
NOLOGY.—In transferring technology under the au-
thority of paragraph (1)(E), the Chief Scientist shall 
give priority in transferring technologies most likely 
to assist in drug interdiction and border enforcement 
to State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies 
in southwest border areas and northern border areas 
with significant traffic in illicit drugs.
‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY.—The author-
ity granted to the Director under this subsection 
shall not extend to the award of contracts, manage-
ment of individual projects, or other operational ac-
tivities. 
(c) ASSISTANCE FROM SECRETARY OF HOMELAND 
SECURITY.—Section 708(d) is amended by inserting ‘‘, 
the Secretary of Homeland Security,’’ after ‘‘The Sec-
retary of Defense’’. 
SEC. 9. REPEALS. 
The following provisions are repealed: 
(1) Sections 709, 710, and 711. 
(2) Section 6073 of the Asset Forfeiture 
Amendments Act of 1988 (21 U.S.C. 1509). 
SEC. 10. NATIONAL YOUTH ANTI-DRUG MEDIA CAMPAIGN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Na-
tional Drug Control Policy (in this section referred to as 
the ‘‘Director’’) shall conduct a national media campaign 
in accordance with this section for the purpose of reducing 
and preventing illicit drug abuse among young people in 
the United States delivered through mass media adver-
tising. 
(b) USE OF FUNDS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Amounts made available to 
carry out this section for the national media cam-
paign may only be used for the following: 
(A) The purchase of media time and space. 
(B) Creative and talent costs. 
(C) Advertising production costs. 
(D) Testing and evaluation of advertising. 
(E) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the 
media campaign. 
(F) The negotiated fees for the winning 
bidder on requests for proposals issued either 
by the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
or its designee for purposes otherwise author-
ized in this section. 
(G) Partnerships with community, civic, 
and professional groups, and government orga-
nizations related to the media campaign. 
(H) 
Entertainment 
industry 
outreach, 
interactive outreach, media projects and activi-
ties, public information, news media outreach, 
and corporate sponsorship and participation. 
(I) Operational and management expenses. 
(2) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—
(A)(i) In using amounts for creative and 
talent costs under paragraph (1)(B), the Direc-
tor shall use creative services donated at no 
cost to the Government wherever feasible and 
may only procure creative services for adver-
tising—
(I) responding to high-priority or 
emergent campaign needs that cannot 
timely be obtained at no cost; or 
(II) intended to reach a minority, eth-
nic, or other special audience that cannot 
reasonably be obtained at no cost. 
(ii) No more than $1,000,000 may be ex-
pended under this section each fiscal year on 
creative services, except that the Director may 
expend up to $2,000,000 in a fiscal year on cre-
ative services to meet urgent needs of the cam-
paign with advance approval from the Commit-
tees on appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Senate upon a showing of 
the circumstances causing such urgent needs of 
the campaign. 
(B) In using amounts for testing and eval-
uation of advertising under paragraph (1)(D), 
the Director shall test all advertisements prior 
to use in the national media campaign to en-
sure that the advertisements are effective and
meet industry-accepted standards. The Director 
may waive this requirement for advertisements 
using no more than 10 percent of the purchase 
of advertising time and 10 percent of the pur-
chase of advertising space if the advertisements 
respond to emergent and time-sensitive cam-
paign needs or the advertisements will not be 
widely utilized in the media campaign. 
(C) In using amounts for the evaluation of 
the effectiveness of the media campaign under 
paragraph (1)(E), the Director shall ensure 
that the effectiveness of the media campaign is 
evaluated in a manner that enables consider-
ation of whether the media campaign has con-
tributed to reduction of illicit drug use by 
youth. 
(D) For each fiscal year, no more than a 
total of 3 percent of the amounts appropriated 
under this section may be used for any costs 
permitted under subparagraphs (G) and (H) of 
paragraph (1). 
(3) LIMITATIONS.—For each fiscal year, not 
less than 80 percent of the amounts appropriated 
under this section shall be used for the purchase of