†
352
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(146) NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.—$5,000,000 for
water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Nash-
ville, Tennessee.
‘‘(147) COUNTIES
OF
LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND
WAYNE, TENNESSEE.—$2,000,000 for water supply
and wastewater infrastructure projects in the Coun-
ties of Lewis, Lawrence and Wayne, Tennessee.
‘‘(148) 
COUNTY
OF
GILES, 
TENNESSEE.—
$2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infra-
structure projects in the County of Giles, Tennessee.
‘‘(149) CITY
OF
KNOXVILLE, 
TENNESSEE.—
$5,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infra-
structure projects in the City of Knoxville, Tennessee.
‘‘(150) 
SHELBY
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.—
$4,000,000 for water-related environmental infra-
structure projects in County of Shelby, Tennessee.
‘‘(151) 
JOHNSON
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.—
$600,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastruc-
ture projects in Johnson County, Tennessee.
‘‘(152) PLATEAU
UTILITY
DISTRICT, MORGAN
COUNTY, TENNESSEE.—$1,000,000 for water supply
and wastewater infrastructure projects in Morgan
County, Tennessee.
†
353
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(153) CITY
OF
HARROGATE, TENNESSEE.—
$2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infra-
structure projects in City of Harrogate, Tennessee.
‘‘(154) 
HAMILTON
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.—
$500,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastruc-
ture projects in Hamilton County, Tennessee.
‘‘(155) 
GRAINGER
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.—
$1,250,000 for water supply and wastewater infra-
structure projects in Grainger County, Tennessee.
‘‘(156) 
CLAIBORNE
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.—
$1,250,000 for water supply and wastewater infra-
structure projects in Claiborne County, Tennessee.
‘‘(157) 
BLAINE, 
TENNESSEE.—$500,000 
for
water supply and wastewater infrastructure projects
in Blaine, Tennessee.
‘‘(158) CHESAPEAKE BAY.—$30,000,000 for envi-
ronmental infrastructure projects to benefit the Chesa-
peake Bay, including the nutrient removal project at
the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment facility in
Washington, DC.
‘‘(159) ARKANSAS
VALLEY
CONDUIT, 
COLO-
RADO.—$10,000,000 for the Arkansas Valley Conduit,
Colorado.
†
354
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(160) 
BOULDER
COUNTY, 
COLORADO.—
$10,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, Boulder
County, Colorado.
‘‘(161) PLAINVILLE, CONNECTICUT.—$6,280,000
for wastewater treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
‘‘(162) 
SOUTHINGTON, 
CONNECTICUT.—
$9,420,000 for water supply infrastructure, South-
ington, Connecticut.
‘‘(163) NORWALK, CONNECTICUT.—$3,000,000 for
the Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvement Project,
Norwalk, Connecticut.
‘‘(164) ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT.—$1,000,000 for
infiltration and inflow correction, Enfield, Con-
necticut.
‘‘(165) NEW
HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.—$300,000
for storm water system improvements, New Haven,
Connecticut.
‘‘(166) 
MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$6,250,000 for water reuse supply and a water trans-
mission pipeline, Miami-Dade County, Florida.
‘‘(167) HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$6,250,000 for water infrastructure and supply en-
hancement, Hillsborough County, Florida.
†
355
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(168) 
PALM
BEACH
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$7,500,000 for water infrastructure, Palm Beach
County, Florida.
‘‘(169) CHESAPEAKE
BAY
REGION, MARYLAND
AND VIRGINIA.—$40,000,000 for water pollution con-
trol projects, Chesapeake Bay Region, Maryland and
Virginia.
‘‘(170) MICHIGAN
COMBINED
SEWER
OVER-
FLOWS.—$35,000,000 for correction of combined sewer
overflows, Michigan.
‘‘(171) MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY.—
$1,100,000 for storm sewer improvements, Middle-
town Township, New Jersey.
‘‘(172) 
RAHWAY
VALLEY, 
NEW
JERSEY.—
$25,000,000 for sanitary sewer and storm sewer im-
provements in the service area of the Rahway Valley
Sewerage Authority, New Jersey.
‘‘(173) CRANFORD
TOWNSHIP, NEW
JERSEY.—
$6,000,000 for storm sewer improvements in Cranford
Township, New Jersey.
‘‘(174) YATES COUNTY, NEW YORK.—$5,000,000
for drinking water infrastructure, Yates County, New
York.
†
356
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(175) VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NEW YORK.—
$5,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Village of
Patchogue, New York.
‘‘(176) ELMIRA, NEW
YORK.—$5,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
‘‘(177) ESSEX HAMLET, NEW YORK.—$5,000,000
for wastewater infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New
York.
‘‘(178) NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK.—$5,000,000
for wastewater infrastructure, Niagara Falls, New
York.
‘‘(179) VILLAGE
OF
BABYLON, NEW
YORK.—
$5,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Village of
Babylon, New York.
‘‘(180) FLEMING, NEW
YORK.—$5,000,000 for
drinking water infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
‘‘(181) VILLAGE OF KYRIAS-JOEL, NEW YORK.—
$5,000,000 for drinking water infrastructure, Village
of Kyrias-Joel, New York.
‘‘(182) 
DEVILS
LAKE, 
NORTH
DAKOTA.—
$15,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, Devils
Lake, North Dakota.
‘‘(183) NORTH DAKOTA.—$15,000,000 for water-
related infrastructure, North Dakota.
†
357
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(184) CLARK
COUNTY, NEVADA.—$50,000,000
for wastewater infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
‘‘(185) WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA.—$14,000,000
for construction of water infrastructure improvements
to the Huffaker Hills Reservoir Conservation Project,
Washoe County, Nevada.
‘‘(186) GLENDALE DAM DIVERSION STRUCTURE,
NEVADA.—$10,000,000 for water system improve-
ments to the Glendale Dam Diversion Structure for
the Truckee Meadows Water Authority, Nevada.
‘‘(187) RENO, NEVADA.—$13,000,000 for con-
struction of a water conservation project for the High-
land Canal, Mogul Bypass in Reno, Nevada.
‘‘(188) LOS
ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—
$12,000,000 for the planning, design and construction
of water-related environmental infrastructure for
Santa Monica Bay and the coastal zone of Los Ange-
les County, California.
‘‘(189) MONTEBELLO, CALIFORNIA.—$4,000,000
for water infrastructure improvements in south
Montebello, California.
‘‘(190) LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA.—$4,000,000 for
the 
planning, 
design, 
and 
construction 
of 
a
stormwater program in La Mirada, California.
†
358
HR 1495 EAS
‘‘(191) 
EAST
PALO
ALTO, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$4,000,000 for a new pump station and stormwater
management and drainage system, East Palo Alto,
California.
‘‘(192) PORT
OF
STOCKTON, STOCKTON, CALI-
FORNIA.—$3,000,000 for water and wastewater infra-
structure projects for Rough and Ready Island and
vicinity, Stockton, California.
‘‘(193) PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—$3,000,000 project
for recycled water transmission infrastructure, East-
ern Municipal Water District, Perris, California.
‘‘(194) 
AMADOR
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$3,000,000 for wastewater collection and treatment,
Amador County, California.
‘‘(195) 
CALAVERAS
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$3,000,000 for water supply and wastewater improve-
ment projects in Calaveras County, California, in-
cluding wastewater reclamation, recycling, and con-
junctive use projects.
‘‘(196) SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA.—$3,000,000
for improving water system reliability, Santa
Monica, California.
‘‘(197) MALIBU, CALIFORNIA.—$3,000,000 for
municipal waste water and recycled water, Malibu
†
359
HR 1495 EAS
Creek Watershed Protection Project, Malibu, Cali-
fornia.
‘‘(198) EASTERN UNITED STATES.—$29,450,000
for water supply and wastewater infrastructure in the
Eastern United States.
‘‘(199) WESTERN UNITED STATES.—$29,450,000
for water supply and wastewater infrastructure in the
Western United States.’’.
SEC. 5004. ALASKA.
Section 570(h) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 369) is amended by striking
‘‘25,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘40,000,000’’.
SEC. 5005. CALIFORNIA.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary
may establish a program to provide environmental assist-
ance to non-Federal interests in California.
(b) FORM OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance under this sec-
tion may be in the form of design and construction assist-
ance for water-related environmental infrastructure and re-
source protection and development projects in California,
including projects for wastewater treatment and related fa-
cilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental
restoration, and surface water resource protection and de-
velopment.
†
360
HR 1495 EAS
(c) OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may
provide assistance for a project under this section only if
the project is publicly owned.
(d) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Before providing assistance
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a
partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest to
provide for design and construction of the project to
be carried out with the assistance.
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Each partnership agree-
ment entered into under this subsection shall provide
for the following:
(A) PLAN.—Development by the Secretary,
in consultation with appropriate Federal and
State officials, of a facilities or resource protec-
tion and development plan, including appro-
priate engineering plans and specifications.
(B) LEGAL
AND
INSTITUTIONAL
STRUC-
TURES.—Establishment of such legal and insti-
tutional structures as are necessary to ensure the
effective long-term operation of the project by the
non-Federal interest.
(3) COST SHARING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the
cost of the project under this section—
†
361
HR 1495 EAS
(i) shall be 75 percent; and
(ii) may be provided in the form of
grants or reimbursements of project costs.
(B) CREDIT FOR DESIGN WORK.—The non-
Federal interest shall receive credit for the rea-
sonable costs of design work on a project com-
pleted by the non-Federal interest before entering
into a local cooperation agreement with the Sec-
retary for a project.
(C) CREDIT FOR INTEREST.—In case of a
delay in the funding of the non-Federal share of
the costs of a project that is the subject of an
agreement under this section, the non-Federal in-
terest shall receive credit for reasonable interest
incurred in providing the non-Federal share of
the project costs.
(D) CREDIT FOR LAND, EASEMENTS, AND
RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—The non-Federal interest shall
receive credit for land, easements, rights-of-way,
and relocations toward the non-Federal share of
project costs (including all reasonable costs asso-
ciated with obtaining permits necessary for the
construction, operation, and maintenance of the
project on publicly-owned or -controlled land),
†
362
HR 1495 EAS
but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total
project costs.
(E) OPERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE.—The
non-Federal share of operation and maintenance
costs for projects constructed with assistance pro-
vided under this section shall be 100 percent.
(e) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE
LAWS.—Nothing in this section waives, limits, or otherwise
affects the applicability of any provision of Federal or State
law that would otherwise apply to a project to be carried
out with assistance provided under this section.
(f) NONPROFIT ENTITY.—Notwithstanding section 221
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b), for
any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal
interest may include a nonprofit entity.
(g) EXPENSES OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS.—Not more
than 10 percent of amounts made available to carry out
this section may be used by the Corps of Engineers district
offices to administer projects under this section at Federal
expense.
(h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$5,000,000.
†
363
HR 1495 EAS
SEC. 5006. CONVEYANCE OF OAKLAND INNER HARBOR
TIDAL CANAL PROPERTY.
Section 205 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 3748) is amended to
read as follows:
‘‘SEC. 205. CONVEYANCE OF OAKLAND INNER HARBOR
TIDAL CANAL PROPERTY.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may convey, with-
out consideration, by separate quitclaim deeds, as soon as
the conveyance of each individual portion is practicable, the
title of the United States in and to all or portions of the
approximately 86 acres of upland, tideland, and submerged
land, commonly referred to as the ‘Oakland Inner Harbor
Tidal Canal,’, California (referred to in this section as the
‘Canal Property’), as follows:
‘‘(1) To the City of Oakland, the title of the
United States in and to all or portions of that part
of the Canal Property that are located within the
boundaries of the City of Oakland.
‘‘(2) To the City of Alameda, or to an entity cre-
ated by or designated by the City of Alameda that is
eligible to hold title to real property, the title of the
United States in and to all or portions of that part
of the Canal Property that are located within the
boundaries of the City of Alameda.