I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2371
To provide trade agreements authority to the President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 21, 1995
Mr. ARCHER (for himself, Mr. CRANE, and Mr. DREIER) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,
and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subse-
quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To provide trade agreements authority to the President.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trade Agreements Au-
thority Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. TRADE NEGOTIATING OBJECTIVES.
(a) OVERALL TRADE NEGOTIATING OBJECTIVES.—
The overall trade negotiating objectives of the United
States for agreements subject to the provisions of section
3 are—
(1) to obtain more open, equitable, and recip-
rocal market access;
(2) to obtain the reduction or elimination of
barriers and other trade distorting policies and prac-
tices;
(3) to further strengthen the system of inter-
national trading disciplines and procedures;
(4) to foster economic growth and full employ-
ment in the United States and the global economy;
and
(5) to develop, strengthen, and clarify rules and
disciplines on restrictive or trade-distorting import
and export practices.
(b) PRINCIPAL TRADE NEGOTIATING OBJECTIVES.—
(1) SPECIFIC BARRIERS.—The principal nego-
tiating objectives of the United States regarding spe-
cific trade barriers and other trade distortions are to
expand competitive market opportunities for United
States exports and to obtain more open and fair con-
ditions of trade by reducing or eliminating specific
tariff and nontariff trade barriers.
(2) TRADE IN SERVICES.—The principal nego-
tiating objectives of the United States regarding
trade in services are—
(A) to reduce or eliminate barriers to
international trade in services, including regu-
latory and other barriers that deny national
treatment and restrict the establishment and
operations of service suppliers; and
(B) in the extended negotiations on finan-
cial services to be conducted under the auspices
of the World Trade Organization, to secure
commitments, in a wide range of commercially
important industrial and developing countries,
to reduce or eliminate barriers to the supply of
financial services, including barriers that deny
national treatment and restrictions on the es-
tablishment and operation of financial services
providers, as the condition for the United
States—
(i) offering commitments to provide
national treatment and market access in
each of the financial services subsectors;
and
(ii) making such commitments on a
most-favored-nation basis.
(3) FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT.—The prin-
cipal negotiating objective of the United States re-
garding foreign direct investment is to reduce or
eliminate artificial or trade-distorting barriers to for-
eign direct investment by—
(A) reducing or eliminating exceptions to
the principle of national treatment;
(B) freeing the transfer of funds relating
to investments;
(C) reducing or eliminating performance
requirements;
(D) affirming international legal standards
for expropriation and compensation for expro-
priation; and
(E) providing meaningful procedures for
resolving investment disputes.
(4) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.—The principal
negotiating objectives of the United States regarding
intellectual property are—
(A) to further promote adequate and effec-
tive protection of intellectual property rights,
including through—
(i) accelerating the implementation
globally of the Agreement on Trade-Relat-
ed Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
referred to in section 101(d)(15) of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, and
achieving improvements in the standards
of that Agreement;
(ii) providing strong protection for
new and emerging technologies and new
methods of transmitting and distributing
products embodying intellectual property;
(iii) preventing or eliminating dis-
crimination with respect to matters affect-
ing the availability, acquisition, scope,
maintenance, use, and enforcement of in-
tellectual property rights; and
(B) to secure fair, equitable, and non-
discriminatory market access opportunities for
United States persons that rely upon intellec-
tual property protection.
(5) TRANSPARENCY.—The principal negotiating
objective of the United States with respect to trans-
parency is to obtain broader application of the prin-
ciple of transparency through—
(A) increased public access to information
regarding trade issues;
(B) clarity in the costs and benefits of
trade policy actions; and
(C) the observance of open and equitable
procedures in trade policy matters by parties to
international trade agreements.
(c) ADHERENCE TO OBLIGATIONS UNDER URUGUAY
ROUND AGREEMENTS.—In determining whether to enter
into negotiations with a particular country, the President
shall take into account whether that country has imple-
mented its obligations under the Uruguay Round Agree-
ments (as defined in section 2 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act).
(d) DEFINITION.—As used in subsection (a)(4)(B),
the term ‘‘United States person’’ means—
(1) a United States citizen;
(2) a partnership, corporation, or other legal
entity organized under the laws of the United
States; and
(3) a partnership, corporation, or other legal
entity that is organized under the laws of a foreign
country and is controlled by entities described in
paragraph (2) or United States citizens, or both.
SEC. 3. TRADE AGREEMENTS AUTHORITY.
(a) AGREEMENTS REGARDING TARIFF BARRIERS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Whenever the President de-
termines that one or more existing duties or other
import restrictions of any foreign country or the
United States are unduly burdening and restricting
the foreign trade of the United States and that the
purposes, policies, and objectives of this Act will be
promoted thereby, the President—
(A) on or before December 15, 1999 (or
December 15, 2001, if trade authorities proce-
dures are extended under subsection (c)), may
enter into trade agreements with foreign coun-
tries; and
(B) may, subject to paragraphs (2) and
(3), proclaim—
(i) such modification or continuance
of any existing duty,
(ii) such continuance of existing duty-
free or excise treatment, or
(iii) such additional duties,
as the President determines to be required or
appropriate to carry out any such trade agree-
ment.
(2) LIMITATIONS.—No proclamation may be
made under paragraph (1) that—
(A) reduces any rate of duty (other than a
rate of duty that does not exceed 5 percent ad
valorem on the date of the enactment of this
Act) to a rate of duty which is less than 50 per-
cent of the rate of such duty that applies on
such date of enactment;
(B) reduces the rate of duty on an article
over a period greater than 10 years after the
first reduction that is proclaimed to carry out
a trade agreement with respect to such article;
or
(C) increases any rate of duty above the
rate that applies on the date of the enactment
of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
(3) AGGREGATE REDUCTION; EXEMPTION FROM
STAGING.—
(A) AGGREGATE REDUCTION.—Except as
provided in subparagraph (B), the aggregate re-
duction in the rate of duty on any article which
is in effect on any day pursuant to a trade
agreement entered into under paragraph (1)
shall not exceed the aggregate reduction which
would have been in effect on such day if a re-
duction of 3 percent ad valorem or a reduction
of one-tenth of the total reduction, whichever is
greater, had taken effect on the effective date
of the first reduction proclaimed under para-
graph (1) to carry out such agreement with re-
spect to such article.
(B) 
EXEMPTION
FROM
STAGING.—No
staging is required under subparagraph (A)
with respect to a duty reduction that is pro-
claimed under paragraph (1) for an article of a
kind that is not produced in the United States.
The United States International Trade Com-
mission shall advise the President of the iden-
tity of articles that may be exempted from stag-
ing under this paragraph.
(4) ROUNDING.— If the President determines
that such action will simplify the computation of re-
ductions under paragraph (3), the President may
round an annual reduction by an amount equal to
the lesser of—
(A) the difference between the reduction
without regard to this paragraph and the next
lower whole number; or
(B) one-half of 1 percent ad valorem.
(5) OTHER LIMITATIONS.—A rate of duty re-
duction or increase that may not be proclaimed by
reason of paragraph (2) may take effect only if a
provision authorizing such reduction or increase is
included within an implementing bill provided for
under section 5 and that bill is enacted into law.
(b) AGREEMENTS REGARDING TARIFF
AND NON-
TARIFF BARRIERS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Whenever the President de-
termines that any duty or other import restriction
imposed by any foreign country or the United States
or any other barrier to, or other distortion of, inter-
national trade—
(A) unduly burdens or restricts the foreign
trade of the United States or adversely affects
the United States economy, or
(B) the imposition of any such barrier or
distortion is likely to result in such a burden,
restriction, or effect,
and that the purposes, policies, and objectives of this
Act will be promoted thereby, the President may,
during the period beginning on January 1, 1996,
and ending on December 15, 1999 (or December 15,
2001, if trade authorities procedures are extended
under subsection (c)), enter into a bilateral or multi-
lateral trade agreement with foreign countries pro-
viding for—
(i) the reduction or elimination of such
duty, restriction, barrier, or other distortion, or
(ii) the prohibition of, or limitation on the
imposition of, such barrier or other distortion.
(2) CONDITIONS.—A trade agreement may be
entered into under this subsection only if such
agreement makes progress in meeting the applicable
objectives described in section 2 and the President
satisfies the conditions set forth in section 4.
(3) BILLS
RELATING
ONLY
TO
NEGOTIATING
OBJECTIVES.—The provisions of section 151 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (in this Act referred to as ‘‘trade
authorities procedures’’) apply to implementing bills
consisting only of—
(A) provisions directly related to principal
trade negotiating objectives set forth in section
2(b) achieved in trade agreements entered into
under this subsection;
(B) if changes in existing laws or new stat-
utory authority is required to carry out such
trade agreements, provisions, necessary to carry
out such trade agreements, either repealing or
amending existing laws or providing new statu-
tory authority; and
(C) provisions necessary for purposes of
complying with section 252 of the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of
1985 in implementing such trade agreements.
(c) EXTENSION DISAPPROVAL PROCESS FOR CON-
GRESSIONAL TRADE AUTHORITIES PROCEDURES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in sec-
tion 5(b)—
(A) the trade authorities procedures apply
to implementing bills submitted with respect to
trade agreements entered into under subsection
(b) on or before December 15, 1999; and
(B) the trade authorities procedures shall
be extended to implementing bills submitted
with respect to trade agreements entered into
under subsection (b) after December 15, 1999,
and before December 15, 2001, if (and only
if)—
(i) the President requests such exten-
sion under paragraph (2); and
(ii) neither House of the Congress
adopts an extension disapproval resolution
under paragraph (5) before December 15,
1999.
(2) REPORT
TO
CONGRESS
BY
THE
PRESI-
DENT.—If the President is of the opinion that the
trade authorities procedures should be extended to
implementing bills described in paragraph (1)(B),
the President shall submit to the Congress, not later
than July 1, 1999, a written report that contains a
request for such extension, together with—
(A) a description of all trade agreements
that have been negotiated under subsection (b)
and the anticipated schedule for submitting
such agreements to the Congress for approval;
(B) a description of the progress that has
been made in multilateral and bilateral negotia-
tions to achieve the purposes, policies, and ob-
jectives of this Act, and a statement that such
progress justifies the continuation of negotia-
tions; and
(C) a statement of the reasons why the ex-
tension is needed to complete the negotiations.
(3) REPORT TO CONGRESS BY THE ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.—The President shall promptly inform
the Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Nego-
tiations established under section 135 of the Trade
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155) of the President’s de-
cision to submit a report to the Congress under
paragraph (2). The Advisory Committee shall submit
to the Congress as soon as practicable, but not later
than August 1, 1999, a written report that con-
tains—
(A) its views regarding the progress that
has been made in multilateral and bilateral ne-
gotiations to achieve the purposes, policies, and
objectives of this Act; and
(B) a statement of its views, and the rea-
sons therefor, regarding whether the extension
requested under paragraph (2) should be ap-
proved or disapproved.
(4) REPORTS
MAY
BE
CLASSIFIED.—The re-
ports submitted to the Congress under paragraphs
(2) and (3), or any portion of the reports, may be
classified to the extent the President determines ap-
propriate.
(5) EXTENSION DISAPPROVAL RESOLUTIONS.—
(A) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘ex-
tension disapproval resolution’’ means a resolution
of either House of the Congress, the sole matter
after the resolving clause of which is as follows:
‘‘That the ll disapproves the request of the Presi-
dent for the extension, under section 3(c)(1)(B)(i) of
the Trade Agreements Authority Act of 1995, of the
provisions of section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974
to any implementing bill submitted with respect to
any trade agreement entered into under section 3(b)
of the Trade Agreements Authority Act of 1995
after December 15, 1999.’’, with the blank space
being filled with the name of the resolving House of
the Congress.
(B) Extension disapproval resolutions—
(i) may be introduced in either House of
the Congress by any member of such House;
and
(ii) shall be jointly referred, in the House
of Representatives, to the Committee on Ways
and Means and the Committee on Rules.
(C) The provisions of sections 152 (d) and (e)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2192 (d) and
(e)) (relating to the floor consideration of certain
resolutions in the House and Senate) apply to exten-
sion disapproval resolutions.
(D) It is not in order for—
(i) the Senate to consider any extension
disapproval resolution not reported by the Com-
mittee on Finance;
(ii) the House of Representatives to con-
sider any extension disapproval resolution not
reported by the Committee on Ways and Means
and the Committee on Rules; or
(iii) either House of the Congress to con-
sider an extension disapproval resolution after
December 14, 1999.
SEC. 4. CONSULTATIONS.
(a) NOTICE AND CONSULTATION BEFORE NEGOTIA-
TION.—The President, at least 90 calendar days before
initiating negotiations on any agreement that is subject
to the provisions of 3(b), shall—
(1) provide written notice to the Congress of
the President’s intent to enter into the negotiations
and set forth therein the date the President intends
to initiate such negotiations, the specific United
States objectives for the negotiations, and whether
the President intends to seek multilateral and bilat-
eral agreement, or changes to an existing agreement;
and
(2) before and after submission of the notice,
consult regarding the negotiations with the Commit-
tee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on
Ways and Means of the House of Representatives
and such other committees of the House and Senate
as the President deems appropriate.
(b) CONSULTATION
WITH
CONGRESS
BEFORE
AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO.—
(1) CONSULTATION.—Before entering into any
trade agreement under section 3(b), the President
shall consult with—
(A) the Committee on Ways and Means of
the House of Representatives and the Commit-
tee on Finance of the Senate; and
(B) each other committee of the House
and the Senate, and each joint committee of the
Congress, which has jurisdiction over legislation
involving subject matters which would be af-
fected by the trade agreement.
(2) SCOPE.—The consultation described in
paragraph (1) shall include consultation with respect
to—
(A) the nature of the agreement;
(B) how and to what extent the agreement
will achieve the applicable purposes, policies,
and objectives of this Act; and
(C) all matters relating to the implementa-
tion of the agreement under section 5, including
whether the agreement includes subject matter
for which supplemental implementing legislation
may be required which is not subject to trade
authorities procedures.
(c) ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORTS.—The report
required under section 135(e)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974
regarding any trade agreement entered into under section
3 (a) or (b) of this Act shall be provided to the President,
the Congress, and the United States Trade Representative
not later than 30 days after the date on which the Presi-
dent notifies the Congress under section 5(a)(1)(A) of the
President’s intention to enter into the agreement.
SEC. 5. IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE AGREEMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—
(1) NOTIFICATION
AND
SUBMISSION.—Any
agreement entered into under section 3(b) shall
enter into force with respect to the United States if
(and only if)—
(A) the President, at least 90 calendar
days before the day on which the President en-
ters into the trade agreement, notifies the
House of Representatives and the Senate of the
President’s intention to enter into the agree-
ment, and promptly thereafter publishes notice
of such intention in the Federal Register;
(B) within 60 days after entering into the
agreement, submits to the Congress a descrip-
tion of those changes to existing laws that are
required in order that the United States not be
in violation of the agreement;
(C) after entering into the agreement, the
President submits a copy of the final legal text
of the agreement, together with—
(i) a draft of an implementing bill de-
scribed in section 3(b)(3);
(ii) a statement of any administrative
action proposed to implement the trade
agreement; and
(iii) the supporting information de-
scribed in paragraph (3); and
(D) the implementing bill is enacted into
law.
(2) SUPPORTING INFORMATION.—The support-
ing information required under paragraph (1)(C)(iii)
consists of—
(A) an explanation as to how the imple-
menting bill and proposed administrative action
will change or affect existing law; and
(B) a statement—
(i) asserting that the agreement
makes progress in achieving the applicable
purposes, policies, and objectives of this
Act; and
(ii) setting forth the reasons of the
President regarding—
(I) how and to what extent the
agreement makes progress in achiev-
ing the applicable purposes, policies,
and objectives referred to in clause (i),
and why and to what extent the
agreement does not achieve other ap-
plicable purposes, policies, and objec-
tives;
(II) whether and how the agree-
ment changes provisions of an agree-
ment previously negotiated;
(III) how the agreement serves
the interests of United States com-
merce; and
(IV) why the implementing bill
and proposed administrative action is
required to carry out the agreement.
(b) LIMITATIONS ON TRADE AUTHORITIES PROCE-
DURES.—
(1) FOR LACK OF CONSULTATIONS.—(A) The
trade authorities procedures shall not apply to any
implementing bill submitted with respect to a trade
agreement entered into under section 3(b) if both
Houses of Congress separately agree to a procedural
disapproval resolution within any 60-day period.
(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the term
‘‘procedural disapproval resolution’’ means a resolu-
tion of either House of the Congress, the sole matter
after the resolving clause of which is as follows:
‘‘That the President has failed or refused to consult
with the Congress on trade negotiations and trade
agreements in accordance with section 4(b) of the
Trade Agreements Authority Act of 1995 and, there-
fore, the provisions of section 151 of the Trade Act
of 1974 shall not apply to any implementing bill
submitted with respect to any trade agreement en-
tered into under section 3(b) of the Trade Agree-
ments Authority Act of 1995, if, during the 60-day
period beginning on the date on which this resolu-
tion 
is 
agreed 
to 
by 
the 
lllll, 
the
lllll agrees to a procedural disapproval reso-
lution (within the meaning of section 5(b)(2)(B) of
that Act).’’, with the first blank space being filled
with the name of the resolving House of the Con-
gress and the second blank space being filled with
the name of the other House of the Congress.
(2) PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERING RESOLU-
TIONS.—(A) Procedural disapproval resolutions—
(i) in the House of Representatives—
(I) shall be introduced by the chair-
man or ranking minority member of the
Committee on Ways and Means or the
chairman or ranking minority member of
the Committee on Rules;
(II) shall be jointly referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means and the
Committee on Rules; and
(III) may not be amended by either
Committee; and
(ii) in the Senate shall be original resolu-
tions of the Committee on Finance.
(B) The provisions of section 152(d) and (e) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2192(d) and (e))
(relating to the floor consideration of certain resolu-
tions in the House and Senate) apply to procedural
disapproval resolutions.
(C) It is not in order for the House of Rep-
resentatives to consider any procedural disapproval
resolution not reported by the Committee on Ways
and Means and the Committee on Rules.
(c) RULES OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND
SENATE.—Subsection (b) of this section and section 3(c)
are enacted by the Congress—
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of
the House of Representatives and the Senate, re-
spectively, and as such is deemed a part of the rules
of each House, respectively, and such procedures su-
persede other rules only to the extent that they are
inconsistent with such other rules; and
(2) with the full recognition of the constitu-
tional right of either House to change the rules (so
far as relating to the procedures of that House) at
any time, in the same manner, and to the same ex-
tent as any other rule of that House.
SEC. 6. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TRADE AGREEMENTS.
(a) EXTENDED NEGOTIATIONS
IN
THE URUGUAY
ROUND.—Notwithstanding section 3(b)(2) and section
5(b), the provisions of section 4(a) shall not apply to an
agreement which results from negotiations that were com-
menced before the date of the enactment of this Act, if
the agreement is directly related to the principal negotiat-
ing objectives set forth in section 135 of the Uruguay
Round Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3555).
(b) AGREEMENT WITH CHILE.—If an agreement to
which section 3(b) applies which provides for the accession
of Chile to the North American Free Trade Agreement
is entered into with Chile after the date of the enactment
of this Act and results from negotiations that were com-
menced before such date of enactment—
(1) the applicability of the trade authorities
procedures to such agreement shall be determined
without regard to the requirements of section 4(a);
and
(2) if such agreement is entered into before
March 15, 1996, section 5(a)(1)(A) shall be applied
by substituting ‘‘30’’ for ‘‘90’’.
SEC. 7. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Trade Act of 1974
(19 U.S.C. 2111 and following) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 151(b)(1) (19 U.S.C. 2191(b)(1)) is
amended by striking ‘‘or section 282 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act’’ and inserting ‘‘, section
282 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, or sec-
tion 5 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act of
1995’’.
(2) Section 131 (19 U.S.C. 2151) is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘sec-
tion 123 of this Act or section 1102 (a) or
(c) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitive-
ness Act of 1988,’’ and inserting ‘‘section
123 of this Act, section 1102 (a) or (c) of
the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness
Act of 1988, or section 3 (a) or (b) of the
Trade 
Agreements 
Authority 
Act 
of
1995,’’; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or
section 3 (a) or (b) of the Trade Agree-
ments Authority Act of 1995’’ after
‘‘1988’’;
(B) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988 or section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Agree-
ments Authority Act of 1995’’ before the end
period; and
(C) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘of this
Act or section 1102 of the Omnibus Trade and
Competitiveness Act of 1988,’’ and inserting
‘‘of this Act, section 1102 of the Omnibus
Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, or sec-
tion 3 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act
of 1995’’.
(3) Sections 132, 133(a), and 134(a) (19
U.S.C. 2152, 2153(a), and 2154(a)) are each
amended by striking ‘‘or section 1102 of the Omni-
bus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988,’’ each
place it appears and inserting ‘‘, section 1102 of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, or
section 3 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act of
1995,’’.
(4) Section 134(b) (19 U.S.C. 2154(b)) is
amended by inserting ‘‘or section 3 of the Trade
Agreements Authority Act of 1995’’ after ‘‘1988’’.
(5) 
Section 
135(a)(1)(A) 
(19 
U.S.C.
2155(a)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or section
3 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act of 1995’’
after ‘‘1988’’.
(6) Section 135(e) (19 U.S.C. 2155(e)) is
amended—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or sec-
tion 3 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act
of 1995’’ after ‘‘1988’’ the first two places it
appears, and by inserting ‘‘or section 5(a)(1)(A)
of the Trade Agreements Authority Act of
1995’’ after ‘‘1988’’ the third place it appears;
and
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or sec-
tion 2 of the Trade Agreements Authority Act
of 1995’’ after ‘‘1988’’.
(b) APPLICATION OF SECTIONS 125, 126, AND 127
OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974.—For purposes of applying
sections 125, 126, and 127 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19
U.S.C. 2135, 2136(a), and 2137)—
(1) any trade agreement entered into under sec-
tion 3 shall be treated as an agreement entered into
under section 101 or 102, as appropriate, of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2111 or 2112); and
(2) any proclamation or Executive order issued
pursuant to a trade agreement entered into under
section 3 shall be treated as a proclamation or Exec-
utive order issued pursuant to a trade agreement en-
tered into under section 102 of the Trade Act of
1974.
Æ
HR 2371 IH——2