H. R. 5009—416 
‘‘(b) DEPUTY DIRECTOR.—(1) There is a Deputy Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency, who shall be appointed by the Secretary 
of Defense from among the general officers on active duty in the 
Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, or from among 
the flag officers on active duty in the Navy. In selecting an indi-
vidual to serve as the Deputy Director, the Secretary of Defense 
shall select an individual who serves in a different armed force 
than the armed force in which the Director serves. 
‘‘(2) The Deputy Director shall be appointed for a term of 
not fewer than two, and not more than four years. 
‘‘(3) The Deputy Director shall be under the authority, direction, 
and control of the Director of the Missile Defense Agency. 
‘‘(4) The Deputy Director shall— 
‘‘(A) carry out such responsibilities as may be assigned 
by the Director; and 
‘‘(B) serve as acting director during periods of absence 
by the Director, or at such times as the office of the Director 
is vacant. 
‘‘(c) NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES TO NON-STANDARD ACQUISITION 
AND REQUIREMENTS PROCESSES
AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—(1) The 
Secretary of Defense may not make any changes to the missile 
defense non-standard acquisition and requirements processes and 
responsibilities unless, with respect to those proposed changes— 
‘‘(A) the Secretary, without delegation, has taken each of 
the actions specified in paragraph (2); and 
‘‘(B) a period of 120 days has elapsed following the date 
on which the Secretary submits the report under subparagraph 
(C) of such paragraph. 
‘‘(2) If the Secretary proposes to make changes to the missile 
defense non-standard acquisition and requirements processes and 
responsibilities, the Secretary shall— 
‘‘(A) consult with the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering, the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Policy, the Secretaries of the military departments, 
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander 
of the United States Strategic Command, the Commander of 
the United States Northern Command, and the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency, regarding the changes; 
‘‘(B) certify to the congressional defense committees that 
the Secretary has coordinated the changes with, and received 
the views of, the individuals referred to in subparagraph (A); 
‘‘(C) submit to the congressional defense committees a 
report that contains— 
‘‘(i) a description of the changes, the rationale for the 
changes, and the views of the individuals referred to in 
subparagraph (A) with respect to the changes; 
‘‘(ii) a certification that the changes will not impair 
the missile defense capabilities of the United States nor 
degrade the unique special acquisition authorities of the 
Missile Defense Agency; and 
‘‘(iii) with respect to any such changes to Department 
of Defense Directive 5134.09, or successor directive issued 
in accordance with this subsection, a final draft of the 
proposed modified directive, both in an electronic format 
and in a hard copy format; and
H. R. 5009—417 
‘‘(D) with respect to any such changes to Department of 
Defense Directive 5134.09, or successor directive issued in 
accordance with this subsection, provide to such committees 
a briefing on the proposed modified directive described in 
subparagraph (C)(iii). 
‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘non-standard acquisition and 
requirements processes and responsibilities’ means the processes 
and responsibilities described in— 
‘‘(A) the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense titled 
‘Missile Defense Program Direction’ signed on January 2, 2002, 
as in effect on the date of the enactment of this subsection 
or as modified in accordance with this subsection, or any suc-
cessor memorandum issued in accordance with this subsection; 
‘‘(B) Department of Defense Directive 5134.09, as in effect 
on the date of the enactment of this subsection (without regard 
to any modifications described in Directive-type Memorandum 
20–002 of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, or any amendments 
or extensions thereto made before the date of such enactment), 
or as modified in accordance with this subsection, or any suc-
cessor directive issued in accordance with this subsection; and 
‘‘(C) United States Strategic Command Instruction 538– 
3 titled ‘MD Warfighter Involvement Process’, as in effect on 
the date of the enactment of this subsection or as modified 
in accordance with this subsection, or any successor instruction 
issued in accordance with this subsection. 
‘‘SUBCHAPTER II—BUDGET AND ACQUISITION MATTERS 
‘‘§ 5511. Ballistic missile defense programs: program elements 
‘‘(a) PROGRAM ELEMENTS SPECIFIED
BY PRESIDENT.—In the 
budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support 
of the Department of Defense budget for any fiscal year (as sub-
mitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) 
of title 31), the amount requested for activities of the Missile 
Defense Agency shall be set forth in accordance with such program 
elements as the President may specify. 
‘‘(b) SEPARATE PROGRAM ELEMENTS FOR PROGRAMS ENTERING 
ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT.—(1) The Sec-
retary of Defense shall ensure that each ballistic missile defense 
program that enters engineering and manufacturing development 
is assigned a separate, dedicated program element. 
‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘engineering and manufacturing 
development’ means the period in the course of an acquisition 
program during which the primary objectives are to— 
‘‘(A) translate the most promising design approach into 
a stable, interoperable, producible, supportable, and cost-effec-
tive design; 
‘‘(B) validate the manufacturing or production process; and 
‘‘(C) demonstrate system capabilities through testing. 
‘‘(c) MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT.—The amount requested for 
a fiscal year for any program element specified for that fiscal 
year pursuant to subsection (a) shall include requests for the 
amounts necessary for the management and support of the pro-
grams, projects, and activities contained in that program element.
H. R. 5009—418 
‘‘§ 5512. Ballistic missile defense programs: display of 
amounts for research, development, test, and 
evaluation 
‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—Any amount in the budget submitted to 
Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for any fiscal year for 
research, development, test, and evaluation for the integration of 
a ballistic missile defense element into the overall ballistic missile 
defense architecture shall be set forth under the account of the 
Department of Defense for Defense-wide research, development, 
test, and evaluation and, within that account, under the subaccount 
(or other budget activity level) for the Missile Defense Agency. 
‘‘(b) TRANSFER CRITERIA.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall 
establish criteria for the transfer of responsibility for a ballistic 
missile defense program from the Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency to the Secretary of a military department. The criteria 
established for such a transfer shall, at a minimum, address the 
following: 
‘‘(A) The technical maturity of the program. 
‘‘(B) The availability of facilities for production. 
‘‘(C) The commitment of the Secretary of the military 
department concerned to procurement funding for that program, 
as shown by funding through the future-years defense program 
and other defense planning documents. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary shall submit the criteria established, and 
any modifications to those criteria, to the congressional defense 
committees. 
‘‘(c) NOTIFICATION OF TRANSFER.—Before responsibility for a 
ballistic missile defense program is transferred from the Director 
of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military depart-
ment, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees notice in writing of the Secretary’s intent to 
make that transfer. The Secretary shall include with such notice 
a certification that the program has met the criteria established 
under subsection (b) for such a transfer. The transfer may then 
be carried out after the end of the 60-day period beginning on 
the date of such notice. 
‘‘(d) CONFORMING BUDGET AND PLANNING TRANSFERS.—When 
a ballistic missile defense program is transferred from the Missile 
Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department in accord-
ance with this section, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 
all appropriate conforming changes are made to proposed or pro-
jected funding allocations in the future-years defense program under 
section 221 of this title and other Department of Defense program, 
budget, and planning documents. 
‘‘(e) FOLLOW-ON RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUA-
TION.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, before a ballistic 
missile defense program is transferred from the Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department, 
roles and responsibilities for research, development, test, and 
evaluation related to system improvements for that program are 
clearly delineated. 
‘‘§ 5513. Unfunded priorities of the missile defense agency: 
annual report 
‘‘(a) REPORTS.—Not later than 10 days after the date on which 
the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress 
pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Director of the Missile
H. R. 5009—419 
Defense Agency shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to the congressional 
defense committees, a report on the unfunded priorities of the 
Missile Defense Agency. 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each report under subsection (a) shall 
specify, for each unfunded priority covered by such report, 
the following: 
‘‘(A) A summary description of such priority, including 
the objectives to be achieved if such priority is funded 
(whether in whole or in part). 
‘‘(B) The additional amount of funds recommended in 
connection with the objectives under subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) Account information with respect to such priority, 
including the following (as applicable): 
‘‘(i) Line Item Number (LIN) for applicable procure-
ment accounts. 
‘‘(ii) Program Element (PE) number for applicable 
research, development, test, and evaluation accounts. 
‘‘(iii) Sub-activity group (SAG) for applicable oper-
ation and maintenance accounts. 
‘‘(2) PRIORITIZATION OF PRIORITIES.—Each report under sub-
section (a) shall present the unfunded priorities covered by 
such report in order of urgency of priority. 
‘‘(c) UNFUNDED PRIORITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘unfunded priority’, in the case of a fiscal year, means a program, 
activity, or mission requirement of the Missile Defense Agency 
that— 
‘‘(1) is not funded in the budget of the President for the 
fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 
of title 31, United States Code; 
‘‘(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associated with 
an operational or contingency plan of a combatant command 
or other validated requirement; and 
‘‘(3) would have been recommended for funding through 
the budget referred to in paragraph (1) by the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency in connection with the budget if 
additional resources had been available for the budget to fund 
the program, activity, or mission requirement. 
‘‘§ 5514. Acquisition accountability on the missile defense 
system 
‘‘(a) BASELINES REQUIRED.—(1) In accordance with paragraph 
(2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall establish 
and maintain an acquisition baseline for— 
‘‘(A) each program element of the missile defense system, 
as specified in section 223 of this title; and 
‘‘(B) each designated major subprogram of such program 
elements. 
‘‘(2) The Director shall establish an acquisition baseline 
required by paragraph (1) before the date on which the program 
element or major subprogram enters— 
‘‘(A) engineering and manufacturing development (or its 
equivalent); and 
‘‘(B) production and deployment.
H. R. 5009—420 
‘‘(3) Except as provided by subsection (c), the Director may 
not adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this 
section. 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS
OF
BASELINES.—Each acquisition baseline 
required by subsection (a) for a program element or major subpro-
gram shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) A comprehensive schedule, including— 
‘‘(A) research and development milestones; 
‘‘(B) acquisition milestones, including design reviews 
and key decision points; 
‘‘(C) key test events, including ground, flight, and 
cybersecurity tests and ballistic missile defense system 
tests; 
‘‘(D) delivery and fielding schedules; 
‘‘(E) quantities of assets planned for acquisition and 
delivery in total and by fiscal year; and 
‘‘(F) planned contract award dates. 
‘‘(2) A detailed technical description of— 
‘‘(A) the capability to be developed, including hardware 
and software; 
‘‘(B) system requirements, including performance 
requirements; 
‘‘(C) how the proposed capability satisfies a capability 
requirement or performance attribute identified through— 
‘‘(i) the missile defense warfighter involvement 
process, as governed by United States Strategic Com-
mand Instruction 538–03, or such successor document; 
or 
‘‘(ii) processes and products approved by the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff or Joint Requirements Oversight 
Council; 
‘‘(D) key knowledge points that must be achieved to 
permit continuation of the program and to inform produc-
tion and deployment decisions; and 
‘‘(E) how the Director plans to improve the capability 
over time. 
‘‘(3) A cost estimate, including— 
‘‘(A) a life-cycle cost estimate that separately identifies 
the costs regarding research and development, procure-
ment, military construction, operations and sustainment, 
and disposal; 
‘‘(B) program acquisition unit costs for the program 
element; 
‘‘(C) average procurement unit costs and program 
acquisition costs for the program element; 
‘‘(D) an identification of when the document regarding 
the program joint cost analysis requirements description 
is scheduled to be approved; and 
‘‘(E) an explanation for why a program joint cost anal-
ysis requirements description has not been prepared and 
approved, and, if a program joint cost analysis require-
ments description is not applicable, the rationale for such 
inapplicability. 
‘‘(4) A test baseline summarizing the comprehensive test 
program for the program element or major subprogram outlined 
in the integrated master test plan.
H. R. 5009—421 
‘‘(c) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION ON REVISION.—The Director may 
adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this sec-
tion if the Director submits to the congressional defense committees 
notification of— 
‘‘(1) a justification for such adjustment or revision; 
‘‘(2) the specific adjustments or revisions made to the 
acquisition baseline, including to the elements described in 
subsection (b); and 
‘‘(3) the effective date of the adjusted or revised acquisition 
baseline. 
‘‘(d) OPERATIONS
AND SUSTAINMENT COST ESTIMATES.—The 
Director shall ensure that each life-cycle cost estimate included 
in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3)(A) 
includes— 
‘‘(1) all of the operations and sustainment costs for which 
the Director is responsible; 
‘‘(2) a description of the operations and sustainment func-
tions and costs for which a military department is responsible; 
‘‘(3) the amount of operations and sustainment costs (dollar 
value and base year) for which the military department or 
other element of the Department of Defense is responsible; 
and 
‘‘(4)(A) a citation to the source (such as a joint cost estimate 
or one or more military department estimates) that captures 
the operations and sustainment costs for which a military 
department or other element of the Department of Defense 
is responsible; 
‘‘(B) the date the source was prepared; and 
‘‘(C) if and when the source was independently verified 
by the Office for Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. 
‘‘§ 5515. Missile defense and defeat programs: major force 
program and budget assessment 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF MAJOR FORCE PROGRAM.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall establish a unified major force program 
for missile defense and defeat programs pursuant to section 222(b) 
of this title to prioritize missile defense and defeat programs in 
accordance with the requirements of the Department of Defense 
and national security. 
‘‘(b) BUDGET ASSESSMENT.—(1) The Secretary shall include with 
the defense budget materials for each of fiscal years 2019 through 
2030 a report on the budget for missile defense and defeat programs 
of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(2) Each report on the budget for missile defense and defeat 
programs of the Department under paragraph (1) shall include 
the following: 
‘‘(A) An overview of the budget, including— 
‘‘(i) a comparison between that budget, the previous 
budget, the most recent and prior future-years defense 
program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this 
title (such comparison shall exclude the responsibility for 
research and development of the continuing improvement 
of such missile defense and defeat program), and the 
amounts appropriated for such missile defense and defeat 
programs during the previous fiscal year; and 
‘‘(ii) the specific identification, as a budgetary line item, 
for the funding under such programs.
H. R. 5009—422 
‘‘(B) An assessment of the budget, including significant 
changes, priorities, challenges, and risks. 
‘‘(C) Any additional matters the Secretary determines 
appropriate. 
‘‘(3) Each report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in 
unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal year, means 
the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress 
by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with respect to 
a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by 
the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that 
fiscal year. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘missile defense and defeat programs’ means 
active and passive ballistic missile defense programs, cruise 
missile defense programs for the homeland, and missile defeat 
programs. 
‘‘SUBCHAPTER III—MISSILE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES 
‘‘§ 5531. Technical authority for integrated air and missile 
defense activities and programs 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency 
is the technical authority of the Department of Defense for 
integrated air and missile defense activities and programs, including 
joint engineering and integration efforts for such activities and 
programs, including with respect to defining and controlling the 
interfaces of such activities and programs and the allocation of 
technical requirements for such activities and programs. 
‘‘(b) DETAILEES.—(1) In carrying out the technical authority 
under paragraph (1), the Director may seek to have staff detailed 
to the Missile Defense Agency from the Joint Functional Component 
Command for Integrated Missile Defense and the Joint Integrated 
Air and Missile Defense Organization in a number the Director 
determines necessary in accordance with subparagraph (B). 
‘‘(2) In detailing staff under subparagraph (A) to carry out 
the technical authority under paragraph (1), the total number of 
staff, including detailees, of the Missile Defense Agency who carry 
out such authority may not exceed the number that is twice the 
number of such staff carrying out such authority as of January 
1, 2016. 
‘‘§ 5532. Hypersonic defense capability development 
‘‘(a) EXECUTIVE AGENT.—The Director of the Missile Defense 
Agency shall serve as the executive agent for the Department 
of Defense for the development of a capability by the United States 
to counter hypersonic boost-glide vehicle capabilities and conven-
tional prompt strike capabilities that may be employed against 
the United States, the allies of the United States, and the deployed 
forces of the United States. 
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Director 
shall— 
‘‘(1) develop architectures for a hypersonic defense capa-
bility, from detecting threats to intercepting such threats, 
that—
H. R. 5009—423 
‘‘(A) involves systems of the military departments and 
the Defense Agencies; and 
‘‘(B) includes both kinetic and nonkinetic options for 
such interception; and 
‘‘(2) not later than September 30, 2017, establish a program 
of record to develop a hypersonic defense capability. 
‘‘§ 5533. Required testing of ground-based midcourse defense 
element of ballistic missile defense system 
‘‘(a) TESTING REQUIRED.—Except as provided in subsection (c), 
not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Director of 
the Missile Defense Agency shall administer a flight test of the 
ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile 
defense system. Beginning not later than five years after the date 
on which the next generation interceptor achieves initial operational 
capability, the Director shall ensure that such flight tests include 
the next generation interceptor. 
‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Director shall ensure that each test 
carried out under subsection (a) provides for one or more of the 
following: 
‘‘(1) The validation of technical improvements made to 
increase system performance and reliability. 
‘‘(2) The evaluation of the operational effectiveness of the 
ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile 
defense system. 
‘‘(3) The use of threat-representative targets and critical 
engagement conditions, including the use of threat-representa-
tive countermeasures. 
‘‘(4) The evaluation of new configurations of interceptors 
before they are fielded. 
‘‘(5) The satisfaction of the ‘fly before buy’ acquisition 
approach for new interceptor components or software. 
‘‘(6) The evaluation of the interoperability of the ground- 
based midcourse defense element with other elements of the 
ballistic missile defense systems. 
‘‘(c) EXCEPTIONS.—The Director may forgo a test under sub-
section (a) in a fiscal year under one or more of the following 
conditions: 
‘‘(1) Such a test would jeopardize national security. 
‘‘(2) Insufficient time considerations between post-test anal-
ysis and subsequent pre-test design. 
‘‘(3) Insufficient funding. 
‘‘(4) An interceptor is unavailable. 
‘‘(5) A target is unavailable or is insufficiently representa-
tive of threats. 
‘‘(6) The test range or necessary test assets are unavailable. 
‘‘(7) Inclement weather. 
‘‘(8) Any other condition the Director considers appropriate. 
‘‘(d) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 45 days after forgoing a 
test for a condition or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the Under 
Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a certification setting forth 
the condition or conditions that caused the test to be forgone under 
such subsection. 
‘‘(e) REPORT.—Not later than 45 days after forgoing a test 
for any condition specified in subsection (c), the Director shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting
H. R. 5009—424 
forth the rationale for forgoing the test and a plan to restore 
an intercept flight test in the Integrated Master Test Plan of the 
Missile Defense Agency. In the case of a test forgone for a condition 
or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the report required by this 
subsection is in addition to the certification required by subsection 
(d). 
‘‘§ 5534. Integration and interoperability of air and missile 
defense capabilities 
‘‘(a) INTEROPERABILITY
OF MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS.—The 
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the chairman of 
the Missile Defense Executive Board (pursuant to section 1681(c) 
of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), acting through the Missile 
Defense Executive Board, shall ensure the interoperability and 
integration of the covered air and missile defense capabilities of 
the United States, including by carrying out operational testing. 
‘‘(b) ANNUAL DEMONSTRATION.—(1) Except as provided by para-
graph (2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the 
Secretary of the Army shall jointly ensure that not less than one 
intercept or flight test is carried out each year that demonstrates 
interoperability and integration among the covered air and missile 
defense capabilities of the United States. 
‘‘(2) The Director and the Secretary may waive the requirement 
in paragraph (1) with respect to an intercept or flight test carried 
out during the year covered by the waiver if the chairman of 
the Missile Defense Executive Board— 
‘‘(A) determines that such waiver is necessary for such 
year; and 
‘‘(B) submits to the congressional defense committees 
notification of such waiver, including an explanation for how 
such waiver will not negatively affect demonstrating the inter-
operability and integration among the covered air and missile 
defense capabilities of the United States. 
‘‘(c) DEFINITION
OF
COVERED
AIR
AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE 
CAPABILITIES.—In this section, the term ‘covered air and missile 
defense capabilities’ means Patriot air and missile defense batteries 
and associated interceptors and systems, Aegis ships and associated 
ballistic missile interceptors (including Aegis Ashore capability), 
AN/TPY–2 radars, or terminal high altitude area defense batteries 
and interceptors. 
‘‘§ 5535. Development of requirements to support integrated 
air and missile defense capabilities 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the memorandum of the 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of January 27, 2014, regarding 
joint integrated air and missile defense, the Vice Chairman of 
the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall oversee the development of warfighter 
requirements for persistent and survivable capabilities to detect, 
identify, determine the status, track, and support engagement of 
strategically important mobile or relocatable assets in all phases 
of conflict in order to achieve the objective of preventing the effective 
employment of such assets, including through offensive actions 
against such assets prior to their use. 
‘‘(b) PURPOSE OF REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements developed 
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used and updated, as appro-
priate, for the purpose of informing applicable acquisition programs
H. R. 5009—425 
and systems-of-systems architecture planning that are funded 
through the Military Intelligence Program, the National Intelligence 
Program, and non-intelligence programs. 
‘‘(c) SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES.—The Vice Chairman shall also 
oversee the development of the enabling framework for intelligence 
support for integrated air and missile defense, including concepts 
for the integrated operation of multiple systems, and, as appro-
priate, the development of requirements for capabilities to be 
acquired to achieve such integrated operations. 
‘‘§ 5536. Testing and assessment of missile defense systems 
prior to production and deployment 
‘‘(a) SUCCESSFUL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL PRODUC-
TION OR OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENT.—The Secretary of Defense may 
not make a final production decision for, or operationally deploy, 
a covered system unless— 
‘‘(1) the Secretary ensures that— 
‘‘(A) sufficient and operationally realistic testing of the 
covered system is conducted to assess the performance 
of the covered system in order to inform a final production 
decision or an operational deployment decision; and 
‘‘(B) the results of such testing have demonstrated 
a high probability that the covered system— 
‘‘(i) will work in an operationally effective manner; 
and 
‘‘(ii) has the ability to accomplish the intended 
mission of the covered system; and 
‘‘(2) the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation has 
carried out subsection (b) with respect to such covered system. 
‘‘(b) ASSESSMENT
BY DIRECTOR
OF OPERATIONAL TEST
AND 
EVALUATION.—The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation 
shall— 
‘‘(1) provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, 
based on the available test data, of the sufficiency, adequacy, 
and results of the testing of each covered system, including 
an assessment of whether the covered system will be sufficiently 
effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and 
‘‘(2) submit to the congressional defense committees a writ-
ten summary of such assessment. 
‘‘(c) RULE
OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 
be construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect a determination 
of the Secretary with respect to the participation of the Missile 
Defense Agency in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development 
System or the acquisition reporting process under the Department 
of Defense Directive 5000 series, or to diminish the authority of 
the Secretary of Defense to deploy a missile defense system at 
the date on which the Secretary determines appropriate. 
‘‘(d) COVERED SYSTEM.—In this section, the term ‘covered 
system’ means a new or substantially upgraded interceptor or 
weapon system of the ballistic missile defense system. 
‘‘§ 5537. Limitation on Missile Defense Agency production 
of satellites and ground systems associated with 
operation of such satellites 
‘‘(a) PRODUCTION OF SATELLITES AND GROUND SYSTEMS.—The 
Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not authorize or obligate
H. R. 5009—426 
funding for a program of record for the production of satellites 
or ground systems associated with the operation of such satellites. 
‘‘(b) PROTOTYPE SATELLITES.—(1) The Director, with the concur-
rence of the Space Acquisition Council established by section 9021 
of this title, may authorize the production of one or more prototype 
satellites, consistent with the requirements of the Missile Defense 
Agency. 
‘‘(2) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Space 
Acquisition Council concurs with the Director with respect to 
authorizing the production of a prototype satellite under paragraph 
(1), the chair of the Council shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report explaining the reasons for such concur-
rence. 
‘‘(3) The Director may not obligate funds for the production 
of a prototype satellite under paragraph (1) before the date on 
which the Space Acquisition Council submits the report for such 
prototype satellite under paragraph (2). 
‘‘SUBCHAPTER IV—MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION 
‘‘§ 5551. Prohibitions relating to missile defense information 
and systems 
‘‘(a) CERTAIN
‘HIT-TO-KILL’ TECHNOLOGY
AND
TELEMETRY 
DATA.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or other-
wise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of 
Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with ‘hit- 
to-kill’ technology and telemetry data for missile defense intercep-
tors or target vehicles. 
‘‘(b) OTHER SENSITIVE MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION.—None 
of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made avail-
able for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be 
used to provide the Russian Federation with— 
‘‘(1) information relating to velocity at burnout of missile 
defense interceptors or targets of the United States; or 
‘‘(2) classified or otherwise controlled missile defense 
information. 
‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—The prohibitions in subsections (a) and (b) 
shall not apply to the United States providing to the Russian 
Federation information regarding ballistic missile early warning. 
‘‘(d) INTEGRATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the 
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate 
a missile defense system of the Russian Federation or a missile 
defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile 
defense system of the United States. 
‘‘§ 5552. Biannual briefing on missile defense and related 
activities 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—On or about June 1 and December 1 of 
each year, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a briefing on matters relating to missile defense 
policies, operations, technology development, and other similar 
topics as requested by such committees. 
‘‘(b) OFFICIALS SPECIFIED.—The officials specified in this sub-
section are the following: 
‘‘(1) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition.
H. R. 5009—427 
‘‘(2) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy. 
‘‘(3) The Director of the Missile Defense Agency. 
‘‘(4) The Director for Strategy, Plans, and Policy of the 
Joint Staff. 
‘‘(c) DELEGATION.—An official specified in subsection (b) may 
delegate the authority to provide a briefing required by subsection 
(a) to a member of the Senior Executive Service who reports to 
the official. 
‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—The requirement to provide a briefing 
under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2028. 
‘‘§ 5553. Provision of information on flight testing of ground- 
based midcourse national missile defense system 
‘‘(a) INFORMATION
TO
BE
FURNISHED
TO
CONGRESSIONAL 
COMMITTEES.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall 
provide to the congressional defense committees information on 
the results of each flight test of the ground-based midcourse national 
missile defense system. 
‘‘(b) CONTENT.—Information provided under subsection (a) on 
the results of a flight test shall include the following matters: 
‘‘(1) A thorough discussion of the content and objectives 
of the test. 
‘‘(2) For each such test objective, a statement regarding 
whether or not the objective was achieved. 
‘‘(3) For any such test objective not achieved— 
‘‘(A) a thorough discussion describing the reasons that 
the objective was not achieved; and 
‘‘(B) a discussion of any plans for future tests to achieve 
that objective.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING REPEALS.—The following provisions of law are 
repealed: 
(1) Sections 130h, 205, 222b, 223, 224, 225, 239a, 487 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(2) Subsection (a) of section 1662 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81; 
10 U.S.C. 4022 note). 
(3) Subsection (a) of section 1681 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(4) Subsection (a) of section 1686 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(5) Section 1687 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 4205 
note). 
(6) Section 1689 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 4205 
note). 
(7) Section 1675 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 4205 
note). 
(8) Section 1687 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 4205 
note). 
(9) Section 1662 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ 
McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 4205 note).
H. R. 5009—428 
(10) Section 224 of the Bob Stump National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(c) FURTHER REPEALS.—The following provisions of law are 
repealed: 
(1) Subsection (a) of section 1668 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(2) Subsection (a) of section 1680 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(3) Section 1681 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 4205 
note). 
(4) Section 223 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
(5) Section 223 of the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 
10 U.S.C. 4205 note). 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 1651. COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS. 
(a) FUNDING ALLOCATION.—Of the $350,116,000 authorized to 
be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2025 
in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division 
D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction 
Program established under section 1321 of the Department of 
Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the 
following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: 
(1) For delivery system threat reduction, $7,036,000. 
(2) For chemical security and elimination, $20,717,000. 
(3) For global nuclear security, $33,665,000. 
(4) For biological threat reduction, $209,858,000. 
(5) For proliferation prevention, $45,610,000. 
(6) For activities designated as Other Assessments/ 
Administration Costs, $33,230,000. 
(b) 
SPECIFICATION
OF
COOPERATIVE
THREAT
REDUCTION 
FUNDS.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding 
table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative 
Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for 
fiscal years 2025, 2026, and 2027. 
SEC. 1652. TEMPORARY CONTINUATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR 
REPORTS 
ON 
ACTIVITIES 
AND 
ASSISTANCE 
UNDER 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
COOPERATIVE 
THREAT 
REDUCTION PROGRAM. 
(a) CONTINUATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1080(a) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 
10 U.S.C. 111 note) does not apply to the report required 
to be submitted to Congress under section 1343(a) of the 
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 
U.S.C. 3743(a)).
H. R. 5009—429 
(2) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1061(d) of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 
114–328; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended by striking paragraph 
(14). 
(b) TERMINATION DATE.—Section 1343(a) of the Department 
of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3743(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) TERMINATION DATE.—The requirement to submit the report 
under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2030.’’. 
SEC. 1653. MODIFICATION TO ANNUAL ASSESSMENT OF BUDGET WITH 
RESPECT 
TO 
ELECTROMAGNETIC 
SPECTRUM 
OPER-
ATIONS CAPABILITIES. 
Section 500c of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated 
by section 1701, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The development of a capability for modeling and simu-
lating multi-domain joint electromagnetic spectrum operations 
to— 
‘‘(A) assess the ability of the joint force to conduct 
such operations in support of the operational plans of the 
combatant commands; and 
‘‘(B) inform improvements to such operations.’’. 
SEC. 1654. MODIFICATION OF MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY FOR 
SPACE-BASED GROUND AND AIRBORNE MOVING TARGET 
INDICATION SYSTEMS. 
(a) MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b) of section 
1684 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2024 (Public Law 118–31; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘the’’ after ‘‘shall be’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘for Milestone A approval (as defined in 
section 4211 of such title)’’; 
(3) by striking ‘‘The Secretary of the Air Force’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph 
(2): 
‘‘(2) APPOINTMENT OF PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER.—The 
service acquisition executive for the Air Force for space systems 
and programs shall appoint a program executive officer, and 
designate an office, for the acquisition of space-based air and 
moving target indication systems.’’. 
(b) INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY.—Such section is further 
amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub-
section (c): 
‘‘(c) INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY.—Not later than May 31, 
2025, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall— 
‘‘(1) designate a date by which the space-based ground 
moving target indication system will achieve initial operational 
capability; and 
‘‘(2) notify the congressional defense committees of such 
date.’’.
H. R. 5009—430 
SEC. 1655. DESIGNATION OF A SENIOR DEFENSE OFFICIAL RESPON-
SIBLE FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL INTEGRATED 
AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ARCHITECTURE FOR THE 
UNITED STATES. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall des-
ignate a senior official of the Department of Defense who shall 
be responsible, subject to appropriations, for the establishment of 
a national integrated air and missile defense architecture for the 
United States. 
(b) DUTIES.—The duties of the official designated under sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) Designing the national integrated air and missile 
defense architecture for the United States. 
(2) Overseeing development of an integrated missile defense 
acquisition strategy for the United States. 
(3) Evaluating the budget requests of each military depart-
ment and Defense Agency to ensure such budget requests are 
sufficient to enable the development of such defense architec-
ture. 
(4) Siting the integrated missile defense systems comprising 
such defense architecture. 
(5) Overseeing long-term acquisition and sustainment of 
such defense architecture. 
(6) Such other duties as the Secretary determines appro-
priate. 
(c) TERMINATION.—The authority of this section shall terminate 
on the date that is 90 days after the date on which the official 
designated under subsection (a) determines that the national 
integrated air and missile defense architecture for the United States 
has achieved initial operational capability. 
TITLE XVII—OTHER DEFENSE MATTERS 
Sec. 1701. Technical and conforming amendments. 
Sec. 1702. Modification of humanitarian assistance authority. 
Sec. 1703. Display of United States flag for patriotic and military observances. 
Sec. 1704. Exclusion of oceanographic research vessels from certain sourcing re-
quirements. 
Sec. 1705. Expanding cooperative research and development agreements to part-
nerships with United States territorial governments. 
Sec. 1706. Use of royalty gas at McAlester Army Ammunition Plant. 
Sec. 1707. Report on Iranian oil sales proceeds. 
Sec. 1708. Prohibition on use of funds for temporary pier in Gaza. 
Sec. 1709. Analysis of certain unmanned aircraft systems entities. 
SEC. 1701. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 
(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States 
Code, is amended as follows: 
(1) In the subtitle analysis for subtitle A— 
(A) by striking the item relating to chapter 19 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘19. Cyber and Information Operations Matters .......................................
391’’; 
(B) by striking the item relating to chapter 25 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘25. Electromagnetic Warfare .........................................................................
500’’; 
(C) by striking the item relating to chapter 326 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘327. Weapon Systems Development and Related Matters 4401’’; .........
H. R. 5009—431 
(D) in part V, by striking the second item relating 
to subpart F, including the items relating to chapters 321 
through 327 appearing under the second item relating to 
subpart F; 
(E) by striking the item relating to chapter 363 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘363. Prohibition and Penalties .....................................................................
4651’’; and 
(F) by striking the item relating to chapter 367 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘367. Other Administrative Matters .............................................................. 4751’’. 
(2) In section 130i(j)(3)(C)(ix), by striking ‘‘sections’’ and 
inserting ‘‘section’’. 
(3) In section 139a(h)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘out by Director’’ and inserting ‘‘out 
by the Director’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘an any’’ and inserting ‘‘and any’’. 
(4) In section 167b— 
(A) in subsection (a)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘referred to as 
the ‘cyber command’ ’’ and inserting ‘‘referred to as 
the ‘United States Cyber Command’ ’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Cyber Command’’ 
and inserting ‘‘United States Cyber Command’’; 
(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Cyber Command’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘United States Cyber 
Command’’; and 
(C) in subsections (c) and (d)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘cyber command’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘United States Cyber Com-
mand’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘such command’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘such Command’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘commander’’ each place it appears 
and inserting ‘‘Commander’’. 
(5) In section 222a(d), by striking ‘‘the’’ before ‘‘all of the 
reports’’. 
(6) In section 381(b), by striking ‘‘Defense—.’’ and inserting 
‘‘Defense—’’. 
(7) In section 391b(e)(1)(B), by striking the colon and 
inserting a semicolon. 
(8) In section 392a(b)(3)(B)(ix), by inserting ‘‘section’’ before 
‘‘932(c)(3)’’. 
(9) In section 486, by redesignating subsection (e) as sub-
section (d). 
(10) In chapter 25, by redesignating sections 501 through 
506 as sections 500a through 500f, respectively. 
(11) In section 510(h)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘subchapters I and 
II’’ and inserting ‘‘subchapters II and III’’. 
(12) In section 520(a)(2), by striking ‘‘armed forced’’ and 
inserting ‘‘armed force’’. 
(13) In section 578(g), by striking ‘‘is approved’’ and 
inserting ‘‘as approved’’. 
(14) In section 624(e), by striking ‘‘is approved’’ and 
inserting ‘‘as approved’’. 
(15) In section 628a— 
(A) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ‘‘apply to report’’ 
and inserting ‘‘apply to the report’’; and
H. R. 5009—432 
(B) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘section 20251’’ and 
inserting ‘‘section 20252’’. 
(16) In section 714(b)(1)(A), by striking ‘‘an serious’’ and 
inserting ‘‘a serious’’. 
(17) In section 937(a)(2)(B) (article 137(a)(2)(B) of the Uni-
form Code of Military Justice), by inserting ‘‘the’’ before ‘‘Space 
Force’’. 
(18) In section 1073c— 
(A) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j); 
and 
(B) by redesignating the second subsection (h) (relating 
to rule of construction regarding secretaries concerned and 
medical evaluation boards) as subsection (i). 
(19) In section 1073d(b)(5)(C)(ii), by striking ‘‘fulfil’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fulfill’’. 
(20) In section 1370— 
(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘or, Space Force’’ 
and inserting ‘‘or Space Force’’; and 
(B) in subsection (f)(6)— 
(i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting a comma after 
‘‘Air Force’’; and 
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting a comma 
after ‘‘Navy’’. 
(21) In section 1465(e), by inserting ‘‘shall’’ before ‘‘provide’’. 
(22) In section 1448(d)(1), by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)(B)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’. 
(23) In section 1558— 
(A) by striking ‘‘,,’’ each place it appears and inserting 
a comma; and 
(B) in subsection (b)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘14507’’ and 
inserting ‘‘14705’’. 
(24) In section 1559(c)(3), by striking ‘‘the the’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the’’. 
(25) In section 2031— 
(A) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in paragraph (1)(E), by striking ‘‘..’’ and 
inserting a period; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2)(E)(vi), by striking ‘‘report 
under subsection (i)’’ and inserting ‘‘report under sub-
section (j)’’; 
(B) by redesignating the second subsection (i) as sub-
section (j). 
(26) In section 2200g(a), by striking ‘‘Under Secretary for 
Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense’’. 
(27) In the section heading for section 2275b, by striking 
the period at the end. 
(28) In section 2285— 
(A) by redesignating subsections (d) through (f) as sub-
sections (c) through (e), respectively; and 
(B) by redesignating the second subsection (b) as sub-
section (f). 
(29) In section 2688(g)(4), by striking ‘‘installation energy’’. 
(30) In the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter 
III of chapter 169, by striking the item relating to section 
2856 and inserting the following: 
‘‘2856. Military unaccompanied housing: standards.’’.
H. R. 5009—433 
(31) In section 2856(a), by striking ‘‘,.’’ and inserting a 
period. 
(32) In section 2911(c)(3), by striking ‘‘installation energy’’. 
(33) In section 2922g(g)(1), by striking ‘‘2202’’ and inserting 
‘‘2002’’. 
(34) In the chapter analysis for part V of subtitle A— 
(A) by striking the item relating to chapter 207 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘207. Budgeting and Appropriations ............................................................. 3131’’; 
(B) by striking the item relating to chapter 225 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘225. øReserved¿ ................................................................................................. 3271’’; 
(C) by striking the item relating to chapter 243 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘243. Other Matters Relating to Awarding of Contracts ......................... 3341’’; 
(D) by striking the item relating to chapter 272 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘272. øReserved¿ ................................................................................................. 3721’’; 
(E) in the item relating to chapter 287, by striking 
‘‘3961’’ and inserting ‘‘3901’’; 
(F) by inserting after the item relating to chapter 307 
the following new items: 
‘‘subpart f—major systems, major defense acquisition programs, and weapon systems development 
‘‘321. General Matters ........................................................................................4201
‘‘322. Major Systems and Major Defense Acquisition Programs Gen-
erally ........................................................................................................4211
‘‘323. Life-Cycle and Sustainment ..................................................................4321
‘‘324. Selected Acquisition Reports ................................................................4350
‘‘325. Cost Growth-Unit Cost Reports (Nunn-McCurdy) ...........................4371
‘‘326. Weapon Systems Development And Related Matters ..................... 4401’’; 
(G) by striking the item relating to chapter 363 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘363. Prohibition and Penalties ..................................................................... 4651’’; 
(H) by striking the item relating to chapter 367 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘367. Other Administrative Matters ..............................................................
4751’’; and 
(I) by striking the item relating to chapter 383 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘383. Development, Application, and Support of Dual-use Tech-
nologies ................................................................................................... 4831’’. 
(35) In section 3221(b)(6)(A)— 
(A) in clause (iii), by striking the semicolon and 
inserting ‘‘; and’’; 
(B) by striking clause (iv); and 
(C) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (iv). 
(36) In section 3225(3)(B), by striking ‘‘, or the next quar-
terly report pursuant to section 2445c of this title in the case 
of a major automated information system program’’. 
(37) In section 3601(a)(2), by inserting ‘‘note’’ before ‘‘prec.’’. 
(38) In section 4141(a)(2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘section 2304’’ and inserting ‘‘section 
3204’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘subsection (c)(5)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub-
section (a)(5)’’. 
(39) In section 4211—
H. R. 5009—434 
(A) by striking ‘‘, major automated information system,’’ 
each place it appears; 
(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘, each major auto-
mated information system,’’; and 
(C) in subsection (c)(2)(H), by striking ‘‘sections 3501 
through 3511’’ and inserting ‘‘section 3501’’. 
(40) In section 4505(h)(6), by striking ‘‘(as that term is 
defined in section 4505(g)(5) of this title)’’. 
(41) In section 4816(b)(6), by striking ‘‘section 2430 of this 
title) or major automated information systems (as defined in 
section 2445a of this title)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 4201 of 
this title’’. 
(42) In section 4902— 
(A) in subsection (e)— 
(i) in paragraph (1)(A)(iii), by inserting ‘‘the’’ before 
‘‘protege firm’’; and 
(ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as subpara-
graph (C) of paragraph (1), and adjusting the margins 
accordingly; and 
(B) in subsection (n)(5)(D), by inserting ‘‘of 1938’’ after 
‘‘Act’’. 
(43) In section 4127, by striking the section heading and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘§ 4127. Defense Innovation Unit’’. 
(44) In section 4273(d), by striking ‘‘4736’’ and inserting 
‘‘4376’’. 
(45) In section 8581(a), by striking ‘‘Provost and Academic 
Dean of the Postgraduate School’’ and inserting ‘‘Provost and 
Chief Academic Officer’’. 
(46) In section 15109, by striking ‘‘(a) In general.—’’. 
(47) In section 15110, by striking ‘‘the title’’ and inserting 
‘‘this subtitle’’. 
(48) In the chapter analysis for part I of subtitle F, by 
striking the item relating to chapter 2013 and inserting the 
following new item: 
‘‘2013. Voluntary Retirement for Length of Service ...........................................20601’’. 
(49) In the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 
2009, by striking the item relating to the second section 20404 
(relating to Force shaping authority) and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘20405. Force shaping authority.’’. 
(50) In section 20404, by striking ‘‘space force’’ both places 
it appears and inserting ‘‘Space Force’’. 
(b) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2024.—Section 1608(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2024 (Public Law 118–31; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note) 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘tranches of the of the’’ and inserting 
‘‘tranches of the’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘Tranch’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘Tranche’’. 
(c) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2023.—Paragraph (3) of section 862(d) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Public Law 117–263; 10 
U.S.C. 4811 note) is amended—
H. R. 5009—445 
Army: Extension of 2022 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Georgia ......
Fort Stewart .........
Barracks ...........
$105,000,000 
Germany ....
Smith Barracks ....
Live Fire Exer-
cise 
Shoothouse ....
$16,000,000 
Indoor Small 
Arms Range ..
$17,500,000 
Hawaii .......
West Loch Naval 
Magazine Annex.
Ammunition 
Storage ..........
$51,000,000 
Wheeler Army Air-
field.
Aviation Unit 
OPS Building 
$84,000,000 
Kansas .......
Fort Leavenworth 
Child Develop-
ment Center ..
$37,000,000 
Kentucky ...
Fort Knox .............
Child Develop-
ment Center ..
$30,000,000 
Louisiana ...
Fort Johnson ........
Joint Operations 
Center ...........
$116,000,000 
Maryland ...
Fort Detrick ..........
Incinerator Fa-
cility ...............
$27,000,000 
New Mexico 
White Sands Mis-
sile Range.
Missile Assem-
bly Support 
Building ........
$29,000,000 
Pennsyl-
vania .......
Letterkenny Army 
Depot.
Fire Station ......
$25,400,000 
Texas ..........
Fort Bliss ..............
Defense Access 
Roads .............
$20,000,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2204. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. 
Sec. 2205. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2020 project at Marine 
Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona. 
Sec. 2206. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. 
Sec. 2207. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2022 projects. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
H. R. 5009—446 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ...................
Marine Corps Air Station Yuma ................
$261,160,000 
Florida ....................
Cape Canaveral Space Force Station ........
$221,060,000 
Georgia ...................
Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay ............
$264,030,000 
Guam ......................
Andersen Air Force Base ............................
$561,730,000 
Joint Region Marinas .................................
$111,666,000 
Naval Base Guam .......................................
$241,880,000 
Hawaii ....................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ..............
$505,000,000 
Marine Corps Base Kaneohe Bay ..............
$297,770,000 
Maryland ................
Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian 
Head.
$106,000,000 
Nevada ...................
Naval Air Station Fallon ............................
$93,300,000 
North Carolina ......
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point ....
$849,520,000 
Virginia ..................
Naval Weapons Station Yorktown .............
$151,850,000 
Norfolk Naval Shipyard .............................
$635,739,000 
Washington ............
Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor .........................
$200,550,000 
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard .....................
$231,490,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Australia ..............
Royal Australian Air Force Base 
Darwin.
$353,970,000 
El Salvador ..........
Cooperative 
Security 
Location 
Comalapa.
$28,000,000 
Federated States 
of Micronesia.
Yap International Airport ...............
$807,700,000 
Palau ....................
Koror, Port of Malakal ....................
$918,300,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as speci-
fied in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including 
land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or 
locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Country or Terri-
tory 
Installation 
Amount 
Guam .................
Andersen Air Force Base ................
$488,186,000
H. R. 5009—452 
Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construction or 
improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
$6,557,000. 
SEC. 2303. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2024, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of the Air 
Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under sections 
2301 and 2302 of this Act may not exceed the total amount author-
ized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2304. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2017 PROJECT AT SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B 
of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2688), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2902 of that 
Act (130 Stat. 2743) and extended by section 2304 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B 
of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2169) and amended by section 
2304(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 721), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2017 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Germany ....
Spangdahlem Air 
Base ...................
ERI: F/A–22 
Low Observ-
able/Comp Re-
pair Fac. ........
$12,000,000 
SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2018 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B 
of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1817), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2903 of that 
Act (131 Stat. 1876) and extended by section 2304(b) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B 
of Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat. 2980) and amended by section
H. R. 5009—453 
2305(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 722), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2018 Project Authorizations 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Hungary .....
Kecskemet Air 
Base ...................
ERI: Airfield 
Upgrades .......
$12,900,000 
Kecskemet Air 
Base ...................
ERI: Construct 
Parallel Taxi-
way ................
$30,000,000 
Kecskemet Air 
Base ...................
ERI: Increase 
POL Storage 
Capacity ........
$12,500,000 
Slovakia .....
Malacky ................
ERI: Increase 
POL Storage 
Capacity ........
$20,000,000 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B 
of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2240), the authorizations set 
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2903 
of that Act (132 Stat. 2287) and extended by section 2306(b) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 
(division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 724), shall remain 
in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
United 
Kingdom
Royal Air Force 
Fairford .............
EDI: Construct 
DABS-FEV 
Storage ..........
$87,000,000
H. R. 5009—454 
Air Force: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations— 
Continued 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Royal Air Force 
Fairford .............
EDI: Munitions 
Holding Area 
$19,000,000 
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2020 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B 
of Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1862), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2301(a) and 
2912(a) of that Act (133 Stat. 1867, 1913), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2020 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Florida .......
Tyndall Air Force 
Base ...................
Deployment 
Center/Flight 
Line Dining/ 
AAFES ..........
$43,000,000 
Georgia ......
Moody Air Force 
Base ...................
41 RQS HH– 
60W Apron ....
$12,500,000 
New Mexico 
Kirtland Air Force 
Base ...................
Combat Rescue 
Helicopter 
Simulator 
(CRH) ADAL
$15,500,000 
Texas ..........
Joint Base San 
Antonio ..............
BMT Recruit 
Dormitory 8 ..
$110,000,000 
Washington 
Fairchild-White 
Bluff ...................
Consolidated 
TFI Base Op-
erations .........
$31,000,000 
SEC. 2308. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2021 PROJECT AT JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, VIR-
GINIA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B
H. R. 5009—455 
of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 4294), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301(a) of 
that Act (132 Stat. 2287) and extended by section 2307(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 725), shall remain in 
effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an 
Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2021 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Virginia ......
Joint Base Lang-
ley-Eustis ..........
Access Control 
Point Main 
Gate With 
Land Acq .......
$19,500,000 
SEC. 2309. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B 
of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2161), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that 
Act (135 Stat. 2168), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2022 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Australia ....
Royal Australian 
Air Force Base 
Darwin ..............
Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
$7,400,000 
Royal Australian 
Air Force Base 
Tindal ................
Aircraft Mainte-
nance Support 
Facility ..........
$6,200,000 
Royal Australian 
Air Force Base 
Tindal ................
Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
$8,200,000
H. R. 5009—456 
Air Force: Extension of 2022 Project Authorizations— 
Continued 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Massachu-
setts ........
Hanscom Air 
Force Base ........
NC3 Acquisi-
tions Manage-
ment Facility 
$66,000,000 
United 
Kingdom
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath .......
F–35A Child 
Development 
Center ...........
$24,000,000 
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath .......
F–35A Munition 
Inspection Fa-
cility ...............
$31,000,000 
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath .......
F–35A Weapons 
Load Training 
Facility ..........
$49,000,000 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment program 
projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Sec. 2404. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Iwakuni, 
Japan. 
Sec. 2405. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2019 project at Iwakuni, 
Japan. 
Sec. 2406. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2020 project at Fort 
Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 2407. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. 
Sec. 2408. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2022 project at Joint 
Base Anacostia-Bolling, District of Columbia. 
Sec. 2409. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2022 projects. 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) 
and available for military construction projects inside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
H. R. 5009—457 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State or 
Territory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ............
Eielson Air Force Base ......................
$14,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ....
$55,000,000 
Arizona ..........
U.S. Army Garrison Yuma Proving 
Grounds ...........................................
$64,000,000 
California .....
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton 
$106,176,000 
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare 
Training Center ..............................
$19,300,000 
Colorado ........
Fort Carson .........................................
$61,359,000 
Florida ...........
Hurlburt Field ....................................
$14,000,000 
Georgia ..........
Hunter Army Airfield ........................
$64,300,000 
Guam .............
Joint Region Marianas ......................
$929,224,000 
Missouri ........
Whiteman Air Force Base .................
$19,500,000 
North Caro-
lina .............
Fort Liberty ........................................
$47,000,000 
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune ...
$84,500,000 
South Caro-
lina .............
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort ..
$31,500,000 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris 
Island.
$72,050,000 
Texas .............
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi .....
$79,300,000 
Virginia .........
Joint 
Expeditionary 
Base 
Little 
Creek-Fort Story.
$35,000,000 
Pentagon .............................................
$36,800,000 
Washington ...
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island ...
$54,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) 
and available for military construction projects outside the United 
States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Japan .............
Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley 
D. Butler .......................................
$160,000,000 
Korea .............
Kunsan Air Base ..............................
$64,942,000 
United King-
dom .............
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ...........
$153,000,000 
SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION 
INVESTMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) 
and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10,
H. R. 5009—458 
United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .................
Anniston Army Depot ..............
$56,450,000 
Delaware ..............
Major Joseph R. ‘‘Beau’’ Biden 
III National Guard/Reserve 
Center ...................................
$22,050,000 
Hawaii ....................
Joint 
Base 
Pearl 
Harbor- 
Hickam ..................................
$16,300,000 
Illinois ....................
Rock Island Arsenal ................
$73,470,000 
Indiana ...................
Camp Atterbury-Muscatatuck 
$39,180,000 
Maine .....................
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard ...
$28,700,000 
Maryland ...............
Aberdeen Proving Ground ......
$34,400,000 
Joint Base Andrews .................
$17,920,000 
New Jersey ............
Joint 
Base 
McGuire-Dix- 
Lakehurst .............................
$19,500,000 
National Guard Training Cen-
ter Sea Girt ...........................
$40,000,000 
Ohio ........................
Wright-Patterson 
Air 
Force 
Base .......................................
$53,000,000 
Washington ............
Joint 
Base 
Lewis-McChord- 
Gray Army Airfield ..............
$40,000,000 
Naval Base Kitsap ...................
$77,270,000 
Naval Magazine Indian Island 
$39,490,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) 
and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, 
United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain ..................
Naval Support Activity Bah-
rain ........................................
$15,330,000 
Greece ...................
Naval Support Activity Souda 
Bay ........................................
$42,500,000 
Italy ........................
Naval Air Station Sigonella ....
$13,470,000 
Japan .....................
Camp Fuji ................................
$45,870,000 
(c) IMPROVEMENT OF CONVEYED UTILITY SYSTEMS.—In the case 
of a utility system that is conveyed under section 2688 of title 
10, United States Code, and that only provides utility services 
to a military installation, notwithstanding subchapters I and III 
of chapter169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States 
Code, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military depart-
ment may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the utility
H. R. 5009—459 
system to carry out the military construction projects set forth 
in the following table: 
Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems 
State 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Maryland .......
Aberdeen Proving Ground ...............
Power 
Generation and 
Microgrid 
Washington ...
Joint-Base 
Lewis-McChord 
Gray 
Army Airfield ................................
Power 
Generation and 
Microgrid 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after Sep-
tember 30, 2024, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of Defense 
(other than the military departments), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation author-
ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under sections 
2401 and 2402 of this Act may not exceed the total amount author-
ized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2018 PROJECT AT IWAKUNI, JAPAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B 
of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1817), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401(b) of 
that Act (131 Stat. 1829) and extended by section 2404 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat.2984) and amended by 
section 2404 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 728), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2018 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Japan .........
Iwakuni .................
PDI: Construct 
Bulk Storage 
Tanks PH 1 ...
$30,800,000
H. R. 5009—460 
SEC. 2405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2019 PROJECT AT IWAKUNI, JAPAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B 
of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2240), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401(b) of 
that Act (132 Stat. 2250) and extended by section 2405(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 729), shall remain in 
effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an 
Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2019 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Japan .........
Iwakuni .................
Fuel Pier ...........
$33,200,000 
SEC. 2406. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2020 PROJECT AT FORT INDIANTOWN GAP, PENNSYL-
VANIA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B 
of Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1862), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as authorized pursuant to section 
2402 of such Act (133 Stat. 1872), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
ERCIP Project: Extension of 2020 Project Authorization 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Pennsyl-
vania .......
Fort Indiantown 
Gap ....................
Install Geo-
thermal and 
413 kW Solar 
Photovoltaic 
(PV) Array .....
$3,950,000 
SEC. 2407. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2021 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B 
of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 4294), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2401(b) and
H. R. 5009—461 
2402 of that Act (134 Stat. 4305, 4306) and extended by sections 
2406 and 2407 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 730), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2021 
Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Arkansas ....
Ebbing Air Na-
tional Guard 
Base ...................
PV Arrays and 
Battery Stor-
age .................
$2,600,000 
California ...
Marine Corps Air 
Ground Combat 
Center 
Twentynine 
Palms ................
Install 10 Mw 
Battery En-
ergy Storage 
for Various 
Buildings .......
$11,646,000 
Naval Support Ac-
tivity Monterey
Cogeneration 
Plant at B236 
$10,540,000 
Italy ............
Naval Support Ac-
tivity Naples .....
Smart Grid .......
$3,490,000 
Japan .........
Def Fuel Support 
Point Tsurumi ..
Fuel Wharf .......
$49,500,000 
SEC. 2408. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2022 PROJECT AT JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, DIS-
TRICT OF COLUMBIA. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2402(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2174) 
for Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, District of Columbia, for construc-
tion of PV carports, the Secretary of Defense may install a 1.0- 
megawatt battery energy storage system for a total project amount 
of $40,650,000. 
SEC. 2409. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B 
of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2161), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2401 and 
2402 of that Act (135 Stat. 2173, 2174), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act
H. R. 5009—462 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2022 
Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Alabama .....
Fort Novosel .........
10 MW RICE 
Generator 
Plant and 
Microgrid 
Controls .........
$24,000,000 
California ...
Marine Corps Air 
Station Miramar 
Additional LFG 
Power Meter 
Station ...........
$4,054,000 
Naval Air Weap-
ons Station 
China Lake- 
Ridgecrest .........
Solar Energy 
Storage Sys-
tem ................
$9,120,000 
Georgia ......
Fort Moore ............
4.8 MW Genera-
tion and 
Microgrid .......
$17,593,000 
Fort Stewart .........
10 MW Genera-
tion Plant, 
with 
Microgrid 
Control ..........
$22,000,000 
Guam .........
Polaris Point Sub-
marine Base ......
Inner Apra Har-
bor Resiliency 
Upgrades Ph 
1. ....................
$38,300,000 
Michigan ....
Camp Grayling .....
650 KW Gas- 
Fired Micro- 
Turbine Gen-
eration Sys-
tem ................
$5,700,000 
Mississippi
Camp Shelby ........
10 MW Genera-
tion Plant an 
Feeder level 
Microgrid Sys-
tem ................
$34,500,000 
Camp Shelby ........
Electrical Dis-
tribution In-
frastructure 
Under-
grounding 
Hardening 
Project ...........
$11,155,000
H. R. 5009—463 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2022 
Project Authorizations—Continued 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
New York ...
Fort Drum ............
Wellfield Field 
Expansion 
Project ...........
$27,000,000 
North Caro-
lina .........
Fort Liberty ..........
10 MW 
Microgrid Uti-
lizing Existing 
and New Gen-
erators ...........
$19,464,000 
Fort Liberty ..........
Emergency 
Water System 
$7,705,000 
Ohio ............
Springfield-Beck-
ley Municipal 
Airport ...............
Base-Wide 
Microgrid 
With Natural 
Gas Gener-
ator, Photo-
voltaic and 
Battery Stor-
age .................
$4,700,000 
Puerto Rico 
Aguadilla ..............
Microgrid Con-
trol System, 
460 KW PV, 
275 KW Gen-
erator, 660 
Kwh Bess ......
$10,120,000 
Fort Allen .............
Microgrid Con-
trol System, 
690 KW PV, 
275 KW Gen, 
570 Kwh Bess 
$12,190,000 
Tennessee ..
Memphis Inter-
national Airport 
PV Arrays and 
Battery Stor-
age .................
$4,780,000 
United 
Kingdom
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath .......
Hospital Re-
placement- 
Temporary 
Facilities .......
$19,283,000 
Virginia ......
National 
Geospatial-Intel-
ligence Agency 
Campus East ....
Electrical Sys-
tem Redun-
dancy .............
$5,299,000
H. R. 5009—464 
TITLE XXV—INTERNATIONAL 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
Sec. 2503. Extension of use of authorized amounts for North Atlantic Treaty Orga-
nization Security Investment Program. 
Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind Contributions 
Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects. 
Sec. 2512. Republic of Poland funded construction projects. 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation Security Investment Program 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as pro-
vided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 
not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 
for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 
previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2024, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States 
Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects 
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program authorized by section 2501, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program 
Location 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Worldwide Un-
specified .........
NATO Security Investment Pro-
gram.
$463,864,000 
SEC. 2503. EXTENSION OF USE OF AUTHORIZED AMOUNTS FOR NORTH 
ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVEST-
MENT PROGRAM. 
Section 2806(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Funds’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Funds’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) If any funds authorized for the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization Security Investment program for a fiscal year are 
available to be obligated or expended at the end of that fiscal 
year and no funds have been authorized for the following fiscal 
year, not more than 50 percent of the amount authorized for the
H. R. 5009—465 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program 
for that fiscal year shall be deemed to be authorized by law for 
purposes of paragraph (1) for the following fiscal year.’’. 
Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind 
Contributions 
SEC. 2511. REPUBLIC OF KOREA FUNDED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required 
in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in the 
Republic of Korea, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects 
Component 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Army ...........
Camp Carroll
MSC–K Paint Re-
moval Booth ............
$9,400,000 
Army ...........
Camp Carroll
Tactical Equipment 
Maintenance Facil-
ity (TEMF) ..............
$72,000,000 
Army ...........
Camp Walker
Elementary School .....
$46,000,000 
Army ...........
USAG Hum-
phreys .........
Embedded Behavioral 
Health Clinic ...........
$10,000,000 
Army ...........
USAG Hum-
phreys .........
General Support Avia-
tion Battalion Hang-
ar ..............................
$180,000,000 
Navy ...........
Chinhae ..........
Upgrade Main Access 
Control Point ...........
$9,200,000 
Air Force ....
Daegu AB .......
Upgrade Water Dis-
tribution System .....
$9,600,000 
Air Force ....
Kunsan AB .....
Combat Small Arms 
Range .......................
$31,000,000 
Air Force ....
Kunsan AB .....
Fighter Squadron and 
Fighter Generation 
Squadron Oper-
ations Facility .........
$46,000,000 
Air Force ....
Osan AB .........
Distributed Mission 
Operations (DMO) 
Flight Simulator .....
$15,000,000 
SEC. 2512. REPUBLIC OF POLAND FUNDED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Poland for required 
in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in the 
Republic of Poland, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table:
H. R. 5009—466 
Republic of Poland Funded Construction Projects 
Component 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Air Force ....
Lask AB .........
AT/FP Upgrades for 
PPI Mission .............
$22,000,000 
Air Force ....
Lask AB .........
Connecting Taxiways 
for RPA Mission ......
$18,000,000 
Air Force ....
Lask AB .........
Ground Comms and 
Data Support Area 
for RPA Mission ......
$5,000,000 
Air Force ....
Lask AB .........
Maintenance Hangar 
for PPI Mission .......
$69,000,000 
Air Force ....
Lask AB .........
RPA Parking Apron ...
$18,000,000 
Air Force ....
Wroclaw AB ...
AT/FP Upgrades for 
APOD Mission ........
$46,000,000 
Air Force ....
Wroclaw AB ...
Comms Infrastructure 
for APOD Mission ...
$10,000,000 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE 
FORCES FACILITIES 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 
land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Sec. 2607. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Hulman 
Regional Airport, Indiana. 
Sec. 2608. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 projects. 
Sec. 2609. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. 
Sec. 2610. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2022 projects. 
Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2022 project. 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Army National Guard 
State or Ter-
ritory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ...........
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ......................
$67,000,000 
Iowa ...............
Sioux City Armory ...............................................
$13,800,000 
Kentucky .......
Fort Campbell ......................................................
$18,000,000 
Louisiana ......
Lafayette Readiness Center ................................
$33,000,000 
Mississippi ....
Southaven Readiness Center ..............................
$33,000,000
H. R. 5009—467 
Army National Guard—Continued 
State or Ter-
ritory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Montana ........
Malta Readiness Center ......................................
$14,800,000 
Nevada ..........
Hawthorne Army Depot ......................................
$18,000,000 
New Jersey ...
Vineland ................................................................
$23,000,000 
Ohio ...............
Lima ......................................................................
$26,000,000 
Oklahoma ......
Shawnee Readiness Center .................................
$29,000,000 
Utah ..............
Nephi Readiness Center ......................................
$20,000,000 
Washington ...
Camp Murray .......................................................
$40,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Army Reserve 
State or Territory 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Amount 
California ..............................
Camp Parks ...........
$42,000,000 
Georgia ...................................
Dobbins Air Re-
serve Base.
$78,000,000 
Kentucky ................................
Fort Knox ...............
$138,000,000 
Massachusetts ........................
Devens Reserve 
Forces Training 
Area.
$39,000,000 
New Jersey .............................
Joint Base 
McGuire-Dix- 
Lakehurst.
$16,000,000 
Pennsylvania ..........................
Wilkes-Barre ..........
$22,000,000 
Puerto Rico .............................
Fort Buchanan .......
$39,000,000 
Virginia ...................................
Richmond ...............
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 
Corps Reserve location inside the United States, and in the amount, 
set forth in the following table:
H. R. 5009—468 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Amount 
Texas .......................................
Naval Air Station 
Joint Reserve 
Base Fort Worth.
$106,870,000 
Washington ...........................
Joint Base Lewis- 
McChord.
$26,610,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Amount 
Alaska ....................................
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson.
$19,300,000 
California ................................
Moffett Airfield ......
$12,600,000 
Florida ....................................
Jacksonville Inter-
national Airport.
$26,200,000 
Hawaii ...................................
Joint Base Pearl 
Harbor-Hickam.
$36,600,000 
Maine ......................................
Bangor Inter-
national Airport.
$48,000,000 
New Jersey .............................
Atlantic City Inter-
national Airport.
$18,000,000 
New York ................................
Francis S. Gabreski 
Airport.
$14,000,000 
Texas .......................................
Fort Worth .............
$13,100,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table:
H. R. 5009—469 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Delaware .................................
Dover Air Force 
Base.
$42,000,000 
Indiana ...................................
Grissom Air Re-
serve Base.
$21,000,000 
Ohio .........................................
Youngstown Air Re-
serve Station.
$25,000,000 
South Carolina .......................
Joint Base Charles-
ton.
$33,000,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2024, for the costs of acquisition, 
architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities 
for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, 
under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the 
cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2607. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2018 PROJECT AT HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT, INDIANA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B 
of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1817), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2604 of that 
Act (131 Stat. 1836) and extended by section 2608 of the Military 
Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of Public Law 
117–263; 136 Stat. 2989) and section 2607 of the Military Construc-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 
137 Stat. 737), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or 
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2018 Project 
Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Indiana .......
Hulman Re-
gional Air-
port ..............
Construct Small Arms 
Range .......................
$8,000,000 
SEC. 2608. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2020 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1862), the authorizations 
set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section
H. R. 5009—470 
2601 of that Act (133 Stat. 1875), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2020 Project 
Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
California ...
Camp Roberts .......
Automated Mul-
tipurpose Ma-
chine Gun 
(MPMG) 
Range ............
$12,000,000 
Pennsyl-
vania .......
Moon Township ....
Combined Sup-
port Mainte-
nance Shop ....
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2609. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2021 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Division B 
of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 4294), the authorizations set 
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601 
and 2602 of that Act (134 Stat. 4312, 4313) and extended by 
section 2609 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 738), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2021 Project 
Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Arkansas ....
Fort Chaffee .........
National Guard 
Readiness 
Center ...........
$15,000,000 
California ...
Bakersfield ...........
National Guard 
Vehicle Main-
tenance Shop 
$9,300,000
H. R. 5009—471 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2021 Project 
Authorizations—Continued 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Massachu-
setts ........
Devens Reserve 
Forces Training 
Area ...................
Automated Mul-
tipurpose Ma-
chine Gun 
Range ............
$8,700,000 
North Caro-
lina .........
Asheville ...............
Army Reserve 
Center ...........
$24,000,000 
Puerto Rico 
Fort Allen .............
National Guard 
Readiness 
Center ...........
$37,000,000 
South Caro-
lina .........
Joint Base 
Charleston ........
National Guard 
Readiness 
Center ...........
$15,000,000 
Texas ..........
Fort Worth ............
Aircraft Mainte-
nance Hangar 
Addition/Alt ..
$6,000,000 
Virgin Is-
lands .......
St. Croix ................
Army Aviation 
Support Facil-
ity (AASF) .....
$28,000,000 
St. Croix ................
CST Ready 
Building ........
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2610. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B 
of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2161), the authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, 
2604, and 2605 of that Act (135 Stat. 2178, 2179), and as amended 
by section 2607(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat. 
2988) and this section, shall remain in effect until October 1, 
2026, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2027, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
H. R. 5009—472 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2022 Project 
Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Alabama .....
Huntsville 
Readiness 
Center .........
National Guard Readi-
ness Center .............
$17,000,000 
Georgia .......
Fort Moore .....
Post-Initial Military 
Training Unaccom-
panied Housing .......
$13,200,000 
Indiana .......
Grissom Air 
Reserve 
Base ............
Logistics Readiness 
Complex ...................
$29,000,000 
Massachu-
setts.
Barnes Air Na-
tional Guard 
Base ............
Combined Engine/ 
ASE/NDI Shop ........
$12,200,000 
Mississippi
Jackson Inter-
national Air-
port ..............
Fire Crash and Rescue 
Station .....................
$9,300,000 
New York ...
Francis S. 
Gabreski 
Airport ........
Base Civil Engineer 
Complex ...................
$14,800,000 
Ohio ............
Wright-Patter-
son Air 
Force Base ..
AR Center Training 
Building/ UHS ........
$19,000,000 
Texas ..........
Kelly Field 
Annex ..........
Aircraft Corrosion 
Control .....................
$9,500,000 
Vermont .....
Bennington .....
National Guard Readi-
ness Center .............
$16,900,000 
Wisconsin ...
Fort McCoy ....
Transient Training Of-
ficer Barracks ..........
$29,200,000 
Wyoming ....
Cheyenne Mu-
nicipal Air-
port ..............
Combined Vehicle 
Maintenance and 
ASE Complex ..........
$13,400,000 
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FISCAL YEAR 
2022 PROJECT. 
With respect to the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2178), 
as amended by section 2610 of this Act, for Bennington, Vermont, 
for construction of a National Guard Readiness Center, the Sec-
retary of the Army may construct the National Guard Readiness 
Center in Lyndon, Vermont.
H. R. 5009—522 
(C) by inserting after the matter preceding paragraph 
(2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (1): 
‘‘(1) An increased level of effort for the construction of 
new facilities and the modernization of existing facilities with 
production and manufacturing capabilities that are necessary 
to support the deterrence of strategic attacks against the United 
States by maintaining and enhancing the performance, reli-
ability, and security of the United States nuclear weapons 
stockpile, including— 
‘‘(A) the nuclear weapons production facilities; and 
‘‘(B) production and manufacturing capabilities resi-
dent in the national security laboratories.’’. 
(D) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by striking 
‘‘An increased level of effort’’ and inserting ‘‘Support’’; 
(E) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking 
‘‘An increased level of effort’’ and inserting ‘‘Support’’; and 
(F) by amending paragraph (4), as so redesignated, 
to read as follows: 
‘‘(4) Support for the modernization of facilities and projects 
that contribute to the experimental capabilities of the United 
States that support the sustainment and modernization of the 
United States nuclear weapons stockpile and the capabilities 
required to assess nuclear weapons effects.’’; 
(2) in section 4204— 
(A) in subsection (a)— 
(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— 
(I) by inserting ‘‘, modernization, and replace-
ment, as required,’’ after ‘‘effective management’’; 
and 
(II) by striking ‘‘, including the extension of 
the effective life of such weapons’’; 
(ii) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘increase the reli-
ability, safety, and security’’ and inserting ‘‘enhance 
the performance and reliability’’; 
(iii) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) 
as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 
(iv) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following 
new paragraph (3): 
‘‘(3) To maintain the safety and security of the nuclear 
weapons stockpile.’’; and 
(v) by amending paragraph (4), as so redesignated, 
to read as follows: 
‘‘(4) To optimize the future size of the nuclear weapons 
stockpile.’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in paragraph (1)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘made to achieve’’ and inserting 
‘‘consistent with’’; and 
(II) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a semi-
colon; 
(ii) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 
(3); 
(iii) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following 
new paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) any changes made to the stockpile consistent with 
the objectives identified in subsection (a) are carried out in 
a cost effective manner; and’’; and
H. R. 5009—614 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Marine Corps Air 
Station Cherry 
Point 
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 
213,520 
53,520 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Marine Corps Air 
Station Cherry 
Point 
COMPOSITE REPAIR FACILITY ..........
114,020 
20,020 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Marine Corps Air 
Station Cherry 
Point 
F–35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT CEN-
TER (INC).
50,000 
50,000 
Palau 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Koror, Port of 
Malakal 
HARBOR WHARF IMPROVEMENTS ...
50,000 
Virginia 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Joint Expedi-
tionary Base 
Little Creek- 
Fort Story 
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER (DE-
SIGN).
2,751 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Marine Corps 
Base Quantico 
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER (DE-
SIGN).
5,681 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Air Station 
Oceana 
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER (DE-
SIGN).
4,080 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Air Station 
Oceana 
UNACCOMPANIED 
HOUSING 
(DE-
SIGN).
16,000 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Station 
Norfolk 
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER (DE-
SIGN).
1,200 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Weapons 
Station York-
town 
CONTAINERIZED LONG WEAPONS 
STORAGE MAGAZINE.
52,610 
52,610 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Weapons 
Station York-
town 
CONVENTIONAL 
PROMPT 
STRIKE 
TEST FACILITY.
47,130 
47,130 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Weapons 
Station York-
town 
CONVENTIONAL 
PROMPT 
STRIKE 
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE, OPER-
ATIONS & STORAGE FACILITY.
52,110 
52,110 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Norfolk Naval 
Shipyard 
DRY DOCK 3 MODERNIZATION (INC) 
54,366 
10,000 
Washington 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Naval Base 
Kitsap-Bangor 
LAUNCHER 
EQUIPMENT 
PROC-
ESSING BUILDING.
200,550 
35,550 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Puget Sound 
Naval Shipyard 
CVN 78 AIRCRAFT CARRIER ELEC-
TRIC UPGRADES.
182,200 
26,200 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
797,446 
797,446 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (BARRACKS) .............................
61,000 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DPRI UNSPECIFIED MINOR CON-
STRUCTION.
21,302 
31,302 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNACCOMPANIED 
HOUSING 
(DE-
SIGN).
50,000 
Navy & Marine 
Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
202,318 
202,318 
Subtotal Military Construction, Navy & Marine Corps .........................
4,540,899 
4,089,622 
AIR FORCE 
Alaska 
Air Force 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS COM-
PLEX (DESIGN).
16,000 
Air Force 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
JOINT 
INTEGRATED 
TEST 
AND 
TRAINING CTR (INC).
126,000 
126,000
H. R. 5009—620 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Ohio 
Defense-Wide 
Wright-Patterson 
Air Force Base 
DISTRICT COOLING PLANT .................
53,000 
Puerto Rico 
Defense-Wide 
Fort Buchanan 
POTABLE 
WATER 
PURIFICATION 
SYSTEM.
South Carolina 
Defense-Wide 
Marine Corps Air 
Station Beau-
fort 
FUEL PIER ...............................................
31,500 
31,500 
Defense-Wide 
Marine Corps Re-
cruit Depot Par-
ris Island 
AMBULATORY 
CARE 
CLINIC 
RE-
PLACEMENT (DENTAL).
72,050 
72,050 
Texas 
Defense-Wide 
Naval Air Station 
Corpus Christi 
GENERAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE ....
79,300 
79,300 
Defense-Wide 
NSA Texas 
CRYPTOLOGIC CENTER (INC) .............
152,000 
United Kingdom 
Defense-Wide 
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath 
LAKENHEATH HIGH SCHOOL ............
153,000 
8,000 
Virginia 
Defense-Wide 
Fort Belvoir 
DEFENSE HEALTH HEADQUARTERS 
225,000 
Defense-Wide 
Joint Expedi-
tionary Base 
Little Creek- 
Fort Story 
SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE TRAIN-
ING CENTER.
32,000 
35,000 
Defense-Wide 
Pentagon 
METRO 
ENTRANCE 
PEDESTRIAN 
ACCESS CONTROL POINT.
36,800 
36,800 
Washington 
Defense-Wide 
Joint Base Lewis- 
McChord—Gray 
Army Airfield 
POWER 
GENERATION 
AND 
MICROGRID.
40,000 
Defense-Wide 
Naval Air Station 
Whidbey Island 
HYDRANT FUELING SYSTEM .............
54,000 
54,000 
Defense-Wide 
Naval Base 
Kitsap 
MICROGRID .............................................
77,270 
Defense-Wide 
Naval Magazine 
Indian Island 
BACKUP POWER AND MICROGRID ...
39,490 
Defense-Wide 
Naval Magazine 
Indian Island 
MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER ...
Defense-Wide 
Naval Undersea 
Warfare Center 
Keyport 
SOF 
COLDWATER 
TRAINING/AUS-
TERE ENVIRONMENT FACILITY.
35,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
COST TO COMPLETE—ERCIP ..............
103,100 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (DEFENSE-WIDE) ...................
26,081 
26,081 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (DHA) .........................................
46,751 
46,751 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (DLA) .........................................
105,000 
105,000 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (DODEA) ....................................
7,501 
7,501 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (MDA) ........................................
4,745 
4,745 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (NSA) .........................................
41,928 
41,928
H. R. 5009—621 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (SOCOM) ...................................
35,495 
35,495 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (TJS) ...........................................
1,964 
1,964 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN (WHS) ........................................
1,508 
1,508 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
ENERGY 
RESILIENCE 
AND 
CON-
SERVATION 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM.
636,000 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
ERCIP DESIGN ........................................
96,238 
96,238 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
EXERCISE RELATED MINOR CON-
STRUCTION.
11,146 
26,146 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (DEFENSE-WIDE).
3,000 
3,000 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (DHA).
18,000 
18,000 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (DLA).
13,333 
13,333 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (DODEA).
7,400 
7,400 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (MDA).
5,277 
5,277 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (NSA).
6,000 
6,000 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION (SOCOM).
24,109 
24,109 
Subtotal Military Construction, Defense-Wide ........................................
3,733,163 
3,187,950 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 
Alaska 
Army National 
Guard 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER.
67,000 
67,000 
Georgia 
Army National 
Guard 
Fort Eisenhower 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER (DESIGN).
Iowa 
Army National 
Guard 
Sioux City Ar-
mory 
NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAIN-
TENANCE SHOP.
13,800 
13,800 
Kentucky 
Army National 
Guard 
Fort Campbell 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER (DESIGN).
Army National 
Guard 
Fort Campbell 
READINESS CENTER .............................
18,000 
Louisiana 
Army National 
Guard 
Abbeville 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER (DESIGN).
Army National 
Guard 
Lafayette Readi-
ness Center 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER.
33,000 
33,000 
Maine 
Army National 
Guard 
Saco 
SOUTHERN 
MAINE 
READINESS 
CENTER (DESIGN).
1,000 
Michigan
H. R. 5009—622 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Army National 
Guard 
Detroit Olympia 
READINESS CENTER ADDITION/AL-
TERATION (DESIGN).
4,400 
Mississippi 
Army National 
Guard 
Southaven Readi-
ness Center 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER.
33,000 
33,000 
Montana 
Army National 
Guard 
Malta Readiness 
Center 
NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAIN-
TENANCE SHOP.
14,800 
14,800 
Nevada 
Army National 
Guard 
Hawthorne Army 
Depot 
AUTOMATED 
QUALIFICATION/ 
TRAINING RANGE.
18,000 
18,000 
New Jersey 
Army National 
Guard 
Vineland 
NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAIN-
TENANCE SHOP.
23,000 
23,000 
North Carolina 
Army National 
Guard 
Salisbury 
FLIGHT FACILITY (DESIGN) ................
Ohio 
Army National 
Guard 
Lima 
READINESS CENTER .............................
26,000 
Oklahoma 
Army National 
Guard 
Shawnee Readi-
ness Center 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER.
29,000 
29,000 
Pennsylvania 
Army National 
Guard 
Danville 
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (DE-
SIGN).
Puerto Rico 
Army National 
Guard 
Gurabo Readiness 
Center 
NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAIN-
TENANCE SHOP.
Rhode Island 
Army National 
Guard 
North Kingstown 
COST 
TO 
COMPLETE: 
NATIONAL 
GUARD READINESS CENTER.
16,000 
Army National 
Guard 
Quonset State 
Airport 
COST 
TO 
COMPLETE: 
NATIONAL 
GUARD READINESS CENTER.
11,000 
Utah 
Army National 
Guard 
Nephi Readiness 
Center 
NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAIN-
TENANCE SHOP.
20,000 
20,000 
Washington 
Army National 
Guard 
Camp Murray 
NATIONAL GUARD/RESERVE CEN-
TER BUILDING.
40,000 
40,000 
Wisconsin 
Army National 
Guard 
Rapids 
NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CEN-
TER (DESIGN).
3,800 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army National 
Guard 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
25,529 
40,529 
Army National 
Guard 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
45,000 
65,000 
Subtotal Military Construction, Army National Guard .........................
362,129 
477,329 
ARMY RESERVE 
California 
Army Reserve 
Bell 
ARMY RESERVE TRAINING CENTER 
Army Reserve 
Camp Parks 
ADVANCED SKILLS TRAINING BAR-
RACKS.
42,000 
42,000 
Georgia 
Army Reserve 
Dobbins Air Re-
serve Base 
ARMY RESERVE CENTER .....................
78,000 
78,000 
Kentucky 
Army Reserve 
Fort Knox 
AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ...........
57,000 
Massachusetts
H. R. 5009—623 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Army Reserve 
Devens Reserve 
Forces Training 
Area 
COLLECTIVE TRAINING ENLISTED 
BARRACKS.
39,000 
New Jersey 
Army Reserve 
Joint Base 
McGuire-Dix- 
Lakehurst 
VERTICAL SKILLS FACILITY ...............
16,000 
16,000 
Pennsylvania 
Army Reserve 
Wilkes-Barre 
AREA MAINTENANCE SUPPORT AC-
TIVITY EQUIPMENT.
22,000 
22,000 
Puerto Rico 
Army Reserve 
Fort Buchanan 
ADVANCED SKILLS TRAINING BAR-
RACKS.
39,000 
39,000 
Virginia 
Army Reserve 
Richmond 
AREA MAINTENANCE SUPPORT AC-
TIVITY/VMS.
23,000 
23,000 
Wisconsin 
Army Reserve 
Andrew Miller 
Army Reserve 
Center 
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (DE-
SIGN).
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army Reserve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
31,508 
31,508 
Army Reserve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
3,524 
3,524 
Subtotal Military Construction, Army Reserve .......................................
255,032 
351,032 
NAVY RESERVE & MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
Texas 
Navy Reserve 
& Marine 
Corps Re-
serve 
Naval Air Station 
Joint Reserve 
Base Fort 
Worth 
WHOLE HANGAR REPAIR ....................
10,000 
Washington 
Navy Reserve 
& Marine 
Corps Re-
serve 
Joint Base Lewis- 
McChord 
PARACHUTE SURVIVAL TRAINING 
FACILITY.
26,610 
26,610 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Navy Reserve 
& Marine 
Corps Re-
serve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MCNR DESIGN ........................................
663 
663 
Navy Reserve 
& Marine 
Corps Re-
serve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
Navy Reserve 
& Marine 
Corps Re-
serve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
USMCR DESIGN ......................................
2,556 
2,556 
Subtotal Military Construction, Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Re-
serve.
29,829 
39,829 
AIR NATIONAL GUARD 
Alaska 
Air National 
Guard 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
BASE SUPPLY COMPLEX ......................
Air National 
Guard 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER SIM-
ULATOR.
19,300 
19,300 
Arizona
H. R. 5009—624 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Air National 
Guard 
Tucson Inter-
national Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—BASE ENTRY 
COMPLEX.
7,000 
California 
Air National 
Guard 
Moffett Airfield 
COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER SIM-
ULATOR.
12,600 
12,600 
Colorado 
Air National 
Guard 
Buckley Space 
Force Base 
COST TO COMPLETE—CORROSION 
CONTROL FACILITY.
4,000 
Florida 
Air National 
Guard 
Jacksonville 
International 
Airport 
F–35 
CONSOLIDATED 
WEAPONS 
TRAINING.
26,200 
26,200 
Hawaii 
Air National 
Guard 
Joint Base Pearl 
Harbor-Hickam 
SPACE CONTROL CENTER ...................
36,600 
36,600 
Kentucky 
Air National 
Guard 
Louisville Mu-
hammad Ali 
International 
Airport 
RESPONSE 
FORCE 
WAREHOUSE 
(DESIGN).
Maine 
Air National 
Guard 
Bangor Inter-
national Airport 
FUEL CELL HANGAR ............................
48,000 
Mississippi 
Air National 
Guard 
Key Field 
ADAL MAINTENANCE HANGAR & 
CONSTRUCT AMU COMPLEX (DE-
SIGN).
5,600 
Air National 
Guard 
Key Field 
BASE 
SUPPLY 
WAREHOUSE 
(DE-
SIGN).
1,900 
Air National 
Guard 
Key Field 
CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR (DE-
SIGN).
6,700 
New Jersey 
Air National 
Guard 
Atlantic City 
International 
Airport 
F–16 MISSION TRAINING CENTER ....
18,000 
18,000 
New York 
Air National 
Guard 
Francis S. 
Gabreski Air-
port 
COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER SIM-
ULATOR.
14,000 
14,000 
Ohio 
Air National 
Guard 
Rickenbacker 
International 
Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—SMALL ARMS 
RANGE.
6,000 
Oregon 
Air National 
Guard 
Portland Inter-
national Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—SPECIAL TAC-
TICS COMPLEX – 1.
7,000 
Air National 
Guard 
Portland Inter-
national Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—SPECIAL TAC-
TICS COMPLEX – 2.
5,000 
Air National 
Guard 
Portland Inter-
national Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—SPECIAL TAC-
TICS COMPLEX – 3.
5,000 
Pennsylvania 
Air National 
Guard 
Pittsburgh Inter-
national Airport 
ENTRY 
CONTROL 
FACILITY 
(DE-
SIGN).
Texas 
Air National 
Guard 
Fort Worth 
C–130J ADAL FUEL CELL BUILDING 
1674.
13,100 
13,100 
Washington 
Air National 
Guard 
Camp Murray 
NATIONAL GUARD/RESERVE CEN-
TER (ANG COST SHARE): MINOR 
CONSTRUCTION.
5,700 
West Virginia 
Air National 
Guard 
McLaughlin Air 
National Guard 
Base 
SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 
(DESIGN).
Worldwide Unspec-
ified
H. R. 5009—625 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Air National 
Guard 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
10,792 
10,792 
Air National 
Guard 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
40,200 
40,200 
Wyoming 
Air National 
Guard 
Cheyenne Re-
gional Airport 
COST TO COMPLETE—CONSTRUCT 
VM & AGE COMPLEX.
4,000 
Subtotal Military Construction, Air National Guard .............................
190,792 
296,692 
AIR FORCE RESERVE 
Arizona 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Luke Air Force 
Base 
ADMINISTRATIVE 
AND 
STORAGE 
BUILDING (DESIGN).
Delaware 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Dover Air Force 
Base 
512TH OPERATIONS GROUP FACIL-
ITY.
42,000 
Georgia 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Dobbins Air Re-
serve Base 
SECURITY FORCES FACILITY .............
22,000 
Indiana 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Grissom Air Re-
serve Base 
INDOOR SMALL ARMS RANGE ...........
21,000 
21,000 
New York 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Niagara Falls Air 
Reserve Station 
TAXIWAY/RUNWAY (DESIGN) .............
6,600 
Ohio 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Youngstown Air 
Reserve Station 
FIRE STATION .........................................
25,000 
25,000 
South Carolina 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Joint Base 
Charleston 
AEROMEDICAL EVACUATION FACIL-
ITY.
33,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
562 
9,562 
Air Force Re-
serve 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUC-
TION.
701 
701 
Subtotal Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ................................
69,263 
137,863 
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
NATO 
NATO Security 
Investment Pro-
gram 
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PRO-
GRAM.
433,864 
463,864 
Subtotal NATO Security Investment Program .........................................
433,864 
463,864 
INDOPACIFIC COMBATANT COMMAND 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
MILCON, 
INDOPACO-
M 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
INDOPACOM MILCON PILOT ..............
150,000 
Subtotal INDOPACOM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PILOT PRO-
GRAM.
150,000 
TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .........................................................
15,113,254 
15,212,254 
FAMILY HOUSING
H. R. 5009—626 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, ARMY 
Belgium 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Army 
Chie`vres Air Base 
FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUC-
TION (84 UNITS).
100,954 
82,954 
Georgia 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Army 
Fort Eisenhower 
MHPI RESTRUCTURE—FORT EISEN-
HOWER.
50,000 
50,000 
Germany 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Army 
U.S. Army Garri-
son Rheinland- 
Pfalz 
FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT 
CONSTRUCTION (54 UNITS).
63,246 
63,246 
Japan 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Army 
Sagamihara Fam-
ily Housing 
Area 
FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS 
CONSTRUCTION (35 UNITS).
31,114 
31,114 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FAMILY HOUSING DESIGN .................
31,333 
31,333 
Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Army .........................................
276,647 
258,647 
FAMILY HOUSING O&M, ARMY 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FURNISHINGS .........................................
18,065 
18,065 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
LEASED HOUSING .................................
129,703 
129,703 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MAINTENANCE .......................................
127,097 
127,097 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MANAGEMENT .......................................
62,060 
62,060 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 
69,579 
69,579 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MISCELLANEOUS ..................................
357 
357 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
SERVICES .................................................
8,273 
8,273 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UTILITIES ................................................
60,477 
60,477 
Subtotal Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army .................
475,611 
475,611 
FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 
Guam 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Andersen Air 
Force Base 
REPLACE 
ANDERSEN 
HOUSING, 
PHASE 10 (42 UNITS).
93,112 
12,112 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Joint Region Mar-
ianas 
REPLACE 
ANDERSEN 
HOUSING, 
PHASE 9 (136 UNITS) (INC).
103,863 
28,863 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
CONSTRUCTION 
IMPROVEMENTS 
(64 UNITS).
35,438 
35,438
H. R. 5009—627 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
13,329 
13,329 
Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Navy & Marine Corps ..........
245,742 
89,742 
FAMILY HOUSING O&M, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FURNISHINGS .........................................
16,839 
16,839 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 
60,283 
60,283 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
LEASING ...................................................
67,412 
67,412 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MAINTENANCE .......................................
109,504 
109,504 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MANAGEMENT .......................................
61,240 
61,240 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MISCELLANEOUS ..................................
427 
427 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
SERVICES .................................................
17,332 
17,332 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Navy & Ma-
rine Corps 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UTILITIES ................................................
44,180 
44,180 
Subtotal Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy & Marine 
Corps.
377,217 
377,217 
FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE 
Alaska 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Joint Base Elmen-
dorf-Richardson 
MHPI RESTRUCTURE—JBER PHASE 
III.
120,000 
120,000 
Germany 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Ramstein Air 
Base 
CONSTRUCT 2 GOQ UNITS ..................
4,350 
4,350 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Ramstein Air 
Base 
KMC 02—CONSTRUCT TWO CAR GA-
RAGES (5 UNITS).
1,400 
1,400 
Japan 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Yokota Air Base 
FAMILY HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 8B 
WEST (19 UNITS).
26,242 
26,242 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Yokota Air Base 
FAMILY HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 9, 
PHASE 2 (32 UNITS).
39,000 
39,000 
Texas 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Lackland Air 
Force Base 
MHPI RESTRUCTURE—LACKLAND ...
24,000 
24,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg Con, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
DESIGN .....................................................
6,557 
6,557 
Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Air Force .................................
221,549 
221,549 
FAMILY HOUSING O&M, AIR FORCE 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified
H. R. 5009—628 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FURNISHINGS .........................................
24,230 
24,230 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 
32,508 
32,508 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
LEASING ...................................................
6,278 
6,278 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MAINTENANCE .......................................
127,023 
127,023 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MANAGEMENT .......................................
71,384 
71,384 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MISCELLANEOUS ..................................
2,426 
2,426 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
SERVICES .................................................
12,446 
12,446 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Air Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UTILITIES ................................................
49,955 
49,955 
Subtotal Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force .........
326,250 
326,250 
FAMILY HOUSING O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FURNISHINGS (DIA) ..............................
687 
687 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
FURNISHINGS (NSA) .............................
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
LEASING (DIA) ........................................
32,983 
32,983 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
LEASING (NSA) .......................................
13,986 
13,986 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
MAINTENANCE .......................................
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UTILITIES (DIA) ......................................
4,358 
4,358 
Fam Hsg O&M, 
Defense-Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
UTILITIES (NSA) .....................................
Subtotal Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide ..
52,156 
52,156 
FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Family Housing 
Improvement 
Fund 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES—FHIF 
8,195 
8,195 
Subtotal Family Housing Improvement Fund ..........................................
8,195 
8,195 
UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified
H. R. 5009—629 
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Unaccompanied 
Housing Im-
provement 
Fund 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES—UHIF 
497 
497 
Subtotal Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund ........................
497 
497 
TOTAL FAMILY HOUSING ...........................................................................
1,983,864 
1,809,864 
DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, ARMY 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC, Army 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE ....
212,556 
237,556 
Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Army .....................................
212,556 
237,556 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, NAVY 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC, Navy 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE ....
111,697 
136,697 
Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Navy ......................................
111,697 
136,697 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, AIR FORCE 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC, Air 
Force 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE ....
121,952 
146,952 
Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force ..............................
121,952 
146,952 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, DEFENSE-WIDE 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC, Defense- 
Wide 
Unspecified 
Worldwide Lo-
cations 
INT–4: DLA ACTIVITIES ........................
1,756 
1,756 
Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Defense-Wide ......................
1,756 
1,756 
TOTAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ..................
447,961 
522,961 
TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND 
BRAC.
17,545,079 
17,545,079 
TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Discretionary Summary by Appropriation 
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
Appropriation Summary:
H. R. 5009—630 
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Program 
FY 2025 
Request 
Conference 
Authorized 
Energy Programs 
Nuclear Energy ..............................................................
150,000 
150,000 
Atomic Energy Defense Activities 
National Nuclear Security Administration: 
Weapons Activities ..................................................
19,848,644 
19,981,044 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation .........................
2,465,108 
2,451,108 
Naval Reactors ........................................................
2,118,773 
1,968,773 
Federal Salaries and Expenses ..............................
564,475 
539,000 
Total, National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion ..............................................................................
24,997,000 
24,939,925 
Defense Environmental Cleanup ..................................
7,059,695 
7,005,630 
Defense Uranium Enrichment D&D ............................
384,957 
Other Defense Activities ................................................
1,140,023 
1,140,023 
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities .....................
33,581,675 
33,085,578 
Total, Discretionary Funding .......................................................
33,731,675 
33,235,578 
Nuclear Energy 
Safeguards and security ..............................................................
150,000 
150,000 
Total, Nuclear Energy .....................................................................
150,000 
150,000 
National Nuclear Security Administration 
Weapons Activities 
Stockpile management 
Stockpile major modernization 
B61–12 Life Extension Program ...................................
27,500 
27,500 
W88 Alteration program ................................................
78,700 
78,700 
W80–4 Life extension program .....................................
1,164,750 
1,164,750 
W80-X ALT SLCM .........................................................
70,000 
Program increase ....................................................
[70,000 ] 
W87–1 Modification Program .......................................
1,096,033 
1,096,033 
W93 .................................................................................
455,776 
455,776 
B61–13 ............................................................................
16,000 
16,000 
Subtotal, Stockpile major modernization ...................
2,838,759 
2,908,759 
Stockpile sustainment .........................................................................
1,356,260 
1,356,260 
Weapons dismantlement and disposition ..........................................
54,100 
54,100 
Production operations .........................................................................
816,567 
816,567 
Nuclear enterprise assurance .............................................................
75,002 
75,002 
Total, Stockpile management ................................................
5,140,688 
5,210,688 
Production Modernization 
Primary Capability Modernization 
Plutonium Modernization 
Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization 
Los Alamos Plutonium Operations ................
984,611 
984,611 
21–D–512 Plutonium Pit Production Project, 
LANL ............................................................
470,000 
470,000 
15–D–302 TA–55 Reinvestments Project, 
Phase 3, LANL .............................................
39,475 
39,475 
Subtotal, Los Alamos Plutonium Moderniza-
tion ......................................................................
1,494,086 
1,494,086
H. R. 5009—665 
‘‘(II) the development of plans and protocols 
to target and rapidly investigate cases involving 
potential serious offenders or the identification and 
rescue of a victim of a contact sexual offense, a 
child sexual exploitation offense, or an offense 
involving child sexual abuse material; 
‘‘(III) the use of training and technical assist-
ance programs to incorporate victim-centered, 
trauma-informed practices in cases involving vic-
tims of contact sexual offenses, child sexual exploi-
tation offenses, and offenses involving child sexual 
abuse material, which may include the use of child 
protective services, children’s advocacy centers, 
victim support specialists, or other supportive serv-
ices; 
‘‘(IV) the development of plans to track, report, 
and clearly communicate successful cases of victim 
identification and child rescue to the Department 
of Justice and the public; 
‘‘(V) an analysis of the investigative and 
forensic capacity of law enforcement agencies and 
prosecutor’s offices within the district, and goals 
for improving capacity and effectiveness; 
‘‘(VI) a written policy describing the criteria 
for referrals for prosecution from Federal, State, 
or local law enforcement agencies, particularly 
when the investigation may involve a potential 
serious offender or the identification or rescue of 
a child victim; 
‘‘(VII) plans and budgets for training of rel-
evant personnel on contact sexual offenses, child 
sexual exploitation offenses, and offenses involving 
child sexual abuse material; 
‘‘(VIII) plans for coordination and cooperation 
with State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agen-
cies and prosecutorial offices; and 
‘‘(IX) evidence-based programs that educate 
the public about and increase awareness of such 
offenses; and 
‘‘(ii) shall be developed in consultation, as appro-
priate, with— 
‘‘(I) the local ICAC task force; 
‘‘(II) the United States Marshals Service Sex 
Offender Targeting Center; 
‘‘(III) training and technical assistance pro-
viders under the ICAC Task Force Program who 
are funded by the Attorney General; 
‘‘(IV) nongovernmental organizations with sub-
ject matter expertise, technical skill, or techno-
logical tools to assist in the identification of and 
response to contact sexual offenses, child sexual 
exploitation offenses, or offenses involving child 
sexual abuse material; 
‘‘(V) any relevant component of Homeland 
Security Investigations; 
‘‘(VI) any relevant component of the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation;