datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3161
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-
nation treatment) to the products of Romania.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 26, 1996
Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. GIBBONS, and Mrs. KENNELLY) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment
(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Romania.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that—
(1) Romania emerged from years of brutal
Communist dictatorship in 1989 and approved a
new Constitution and elected a Parliament by 1991,
laying the foundation for a modern parliamentary
democracy charged with guaranteeing fundamental
human rights, freedom of expression, and respect for
private property;
(2) local elections, parliamentary elections, and
presidential elections have been held in Romania,
and 1996 will mark the second nationwide presi-
dential elections under the new Constitution;
(3) Romania has undertaken significant eco-
nomic reforms, including the establishment of a two-
tier banking system, the introduction of a modern
tax system, the freeing of most prices and elimi-
nation of most subsidies, the adoption of a tariff-
based trade regime, and the rapid privatization of
industry and nearly all agriculture;
(4) Romania concluded a bilateral investment
treaty with the United States in 1993, and both
United States investment in Romania and bilateral
trade are increasing rapidly;
(5) Romania has received most-favored-nation
treatment since 1993, and has been found by the
President to be in full compliance with the freedom
of emigration requirements under title IV of the
Trade Act of 1974;
(6) Romania is a member of the World Trade
Organization and extension of unconditional most-fa-
vored-nation treatment to the products of Romania
would enable the United States to avail itself of all
rights under the World Trade Organization with re-
spect to Romania; and
(7) Romania has demonstrated a strong desire
to build friendly relationships and to cooperate fully
with the United States on trade matters.
SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF
THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO ROMANIA.
(a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN-
SION
OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith-
standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974
(19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—
(1) determine that such title should no longer
apply to Romania; and
(2) after making a determination under para-
graph (1), proclaim the extension of nondiscrim-
inatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment)
to the products of that country.
(b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—
On and after the effective date of the extension under sub-
section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod-
ucts of Romania, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall
cease to apply to that country.
Æ
HR 3162 IH
(A) contain such limitations, deductibles,
exclusions, and exceptions as the Corporation
shall establish; and
(B) apply only to developmental costs in-
curred after the date of the approval of the ap-
plication for such insurance.
(3) 
MAXIMUM
ON
INSURANCE
OF
PRECONSTRUCTION
RISK.—The Corporation shall
not 
insure 
more 
than 
percent 
of 
the
preconstruction phase development risk of any
project, as determined by the Corporation.
(4) ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS.—The Corpora-
tion may impose such other conditions and require-
ments in connection with any insurance provided
under this subsection as the Corporation may deter-
mine to be appropriate, including requirements for
audits of costs and other matters.
(5) FEES FOR INSURANCE.—The Corporation
may charge such fees and obtain such other com-
pensation for providing insurance coverage under
this subsection as the Corporation, in the Corpora-
tion’s discretion, shall determine to be appropriate.
(6) MAXIMUM EXPOSURE OF CORPORATION.—
The total outstanding exposure of the Corporation
with respect to insurance provided under this sub-
II
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3161
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JULY 18, 1996
Received
AN ACT
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment
(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Romania.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that—
HR 3161 RDS
(1) Romania emerged from years of brutal
Communist dictatorship in 1989 and approved a
new Constitution and elected a Parliament by 1991,
laying the foundation for a modern parliamentary
democracy charged with guaranteeing fundamental
human rights, freedom of expression, and respect for
private property;
(2) local elections, parliamentary elections, and
presidential elections have been held in Romania,
and 1996 will mark the second nationwide presi-
dential elections under the new Constitution;
(3) Romania has undertaken significant eco-
nomic reforms, including the establishment of a two-
tier banking system, the introduction of a modern
tax system, the freeing of most prices and elimi-
nation of most subsidies, the adoption of a tariff-
based trade regime, and the rapid privatization of
industry and nearly all agriculture;
(4) Romania concluded a bilateral investment
treaty with the United States in 1993, and both
United States investment in Romania and bilateral
trade are increasing rapidly;
(5) Romania has received most-favored-nation
treatment since 1993, and has been found by the
President to be in full compliance with the freedom
HR 3161 RDS
of emigration requirements under title IV of the
Trade Act of 1974;
(6) Romania is a member of the World Trade
Organization and extension of unconditional most-fa-
vored-nation treatment to the products of Romania
would enable the United States to avail itself of all
rights under the World Trade Organization with re-
spect to Romania; and
(7) Romania has demonstrated a strong desire
to build friendly relationships and to cooperate fully
with the United States on trade matters.
SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF
THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO ROMANIA.
(a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN-
SION
OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith-
standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974
(19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—
(1) determine that such title should no longer
apply to Romania; and
(2) after making a determination under para-
graph (1), proclaim the extension of nondiscrim-
inatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment)
to the products of that country.
(b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—
On and after the effective date of the extension under sub-
HR 3161 RDS
section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod-
ucts of Romania, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall
cease to apply to that country.
Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 1996.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
servator for an enterprise resource bank with
another conservator.
‘‘(B) NO EFFECT ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.—
The replacement of a conservator for an enter-
prise resource bank shall not affect the right of
the bank to obtain judicial review under para-
graph (4) of the Finance Board’s decision to
make the initial appointment of a conservator.
‘‘(6) EXAMINATIONS.—The Finance Board may
examine and supervise any enterprise resource bank
for which a conservator has been appointed during
the period in which the bank continues to operate as
a going concern.
‘‘(7) TERMINATION.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If, at any time, the
Finance Board determines that termination of
a conservatorship for an enterprise resource
bank is in the public interest and may safely be
accomplished, the Finance Board may termi-
nate the conservatorship and permit the bank
to resume the transaction of the business of the
bank subject to such terms, conditions, and lim-
itations as the Finance Board may prescribe.
‘‘(B) ENFORCEMENT
OF
TERMS, CONDI-
TIONS, AND LIMITATIONS.—Any terms, condi-
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5610 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide privacy 
protections that enable certain individuals to remove their profiles from 
the healthcare.gov website, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 
Mr. HURT (for himself and Mr. BARROW of Georgia) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
to provide privacy protections that enable certain individ-
uals to remove their profiles from the healthcare.gov 
website, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthcare Consumer 
Privacy Act of 2014’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:35 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5610.IH
H5610
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. ENABLING CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS TO REMOVE 
THEIR 
PROFILES 
FROM 
THE 
HEALTHCARE.GOV WEBSITE. 
Section 1311(c)(5) of the Patient Protection and Af-
fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(c)(5)) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking at the end 
‘‘and’’; 
(2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub-
paragraph (C); and 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol-
lowing new subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) ensure that such Internet portal, 
whether the healthcare.gov website or a suc-
cessor website, enables an individual who enters 
personal information on such website for pur-
poses of enrolling for health care coverage to re-
move such information from such website if 
such individual decides not to apply for such 
enrollment; and’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:35 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5610.IH
H5610
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
subsection (a)(2) (but not by more than the amount of
the reduction).
(e) REPORTS.—Any estimate under subsection (a)
and any determination under subsection (b), (c), or (d)
shall be reported by the Secretary of the Army to Con-
gress.
(f) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section the
following definitions apply:
(1) AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND.—The
term ‘‘Airport and Airway Trust Fund’’ means the
Airport and Airway Trust Fund established by sec-
tion 9502 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(2) HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND.—The
term ‘‘Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund’’ means the
Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund established by sec-
tion 9505 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(3) HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.—The term ‘‘High-
way Trust Fund’’ means the Highway Trust Fund
established by section 9503 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986.
(4) INLAND
WATERWAYS
TRUST
FUND.—The
term ‘‘Inland Waterways Trust Fund’’ means the
Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by section
9506 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(5) NET HARBOR MAINTENANCE RECEIPTS.—
The term ‘‘net harbor maintenance receipts’’ means,
with respect to any period, the receipts (including in-
terest) of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund dur-
ing such period.
(6) NET INLAND WATERWAYS RECEIPTS.—The
term ‘‘net inland waterways receipts’’ means, with
respect to any period, the receipts (including inter-
est) of the Inland Waterways Trust Fund during
such period.
(7) UNFUNDED INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHOR-
IZATIONS.—The term ‘‘unfunded inland waterways
authorizations’’ means, at any time, the excess (if
any) of—
(A) the total amount authorized to be ap-
propriated from the Inland Waterways Trust
Fund which has not been appropriated, over
(B) the amount available in the Inland
Waterways Trust Fund at such time to make
such appropriations.
(8) UNFUNDED
HARBOR
MAINTENANCE
AU-
THORIZATIONS.—The term ‘‘unfunded harbor main-
tenance authorizations’’ means, at any time, the ex-
cess (if any) of—
(A) the total amount authorized to be ap-
propriated from the Harbor Maintenance Trust
Fund which has not been appropriated, over
(B) the amount available in the Harbor
Maintenance Trust Fund at such time to make
such appropriations.
SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY.
This Act (including the amendments made by this
Act) shall apply to fiscal years beginning after September
30, 1995.
Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 1996.
Attest:
Clerk.
160 
stroyed article were imported; 
and 
‘‘(II) reduced by the value of ma-
terials recovered during destruction as 
provided in subsection (x). 
‘‘(3) STATUS REPORTS ON REGULATIONS.—Not 
later than the date that is one year after the date 
of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and 
Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, and annually there-
after until the regulations required by paragraph (2) 
are final, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the status of those regulations.’’. 
(h) SUBSTITUTION OF FINISHED PETROLEUM DE-
RIVATIVES.—Section 313(p) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1313(p)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘HTS’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3)(A)— 
(A) in clause (ii)(III), by striking ‘‘, as so 
certified in a certificate of delivery or certificate 
of manufacture and delivery’’; and 
(B) in the flush text at the end— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:33 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1907.IH
H1907
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5612 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to reduce 
the testing requirements for part A of title I of such Act, and for 
other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 
Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 to reduce the testing requirements for part A 
of title I of such Act, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tackling Excessive 
Standardized Testing Act of 2014’’ or the ‘‘TEST Act of 
2014’’. 
SEC. 2. ESEA AMENDMENTS. 
(a) 
ACADEMIC
ASSESSMENTS.—Section 
1111(b)(3)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:33 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5612.IH
H5612
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(3)(C)) is amend-
ed— 
(1) in clause (v)(I), by striking ‘‘clause vii’’ and 
inserting ‘‘clause (vii) and as otherwise provided 
under clause (xvi)’’; 
(2) in clause (vii), by inserting ‘‘except as oth-
erwise provided under clause (xvi),’’ before ‘‘begin-
ning’’; 
(3) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (xiv); 
(4) by striking the period at the end of clause 
(xv); and 
(5) by adding at the end the following new 
clause: 
‘‘(xvi) beginning with the first full 
school year after the date of enactment of 
the TEST Act of 2014, in lieu of the re-
quirements of clause (vii)— 
‘‘(I) authorize any public elemen-
tary school or public secondary school 
to administer the academic assess-
ments in mathematics required under 
clause (vii) in each of grades 4, 6, and 
8; 
‘‘(II) authorize any public ele-
mentary school or public secondary 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:33 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5612.IH
H5612
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 3162 IH
section may not exceed the amount which is equal to
5 percent of the sum of the capital, surplus, and re-
tained earnings of the Corporation, as measured at
the time any such insurance is provided.
(g) DISCRETION OF CORPORATION AND INSURANCE
CORPORATION.—Consistent with other provisions of this
Act, any determination of the Corporation or the Insur-
ance Corporation to provide assistance to any project, and
the manner in which such assistance is provided, including
the terms, conditions, fees and charges in respect thereof,
shall be at the sole discretion of the Corporation or the
Insurance Corporation, as the case may be.
(h) INDEPENDENT INVESTMENT COMMITTEE.—Any
final decision to provide or not provide assistance under
this Act by the Corporation or the Insurance Corporation
with respect to any specific proposal shall be made by an
investment committee, of the respective corporation, which
shall be comprised of senior officers of the Corporation
and the Insurance Corporation, as the case may be, ap-
pointed to such committee by the respective board of direc-
tors, which committees shall not have any nonofficer direc-
tor members.
(i) STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS REQUIRED.—The
provision of assistance by the Corporation or the Insur-
ance Corporation in accordance with this section shall not
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5614 
To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 
Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To reauthorize the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Anti- 
Doping Agency Reauthorization Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBIT PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING METHODS. 
Section 701 of title VII of the Office of National 
Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 
U.S.C. 2001) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (4); 
and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:37 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5614.IH
H5614
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and be 
recognized worldwide as the independent na-
tional anti-doping organization for the United 
States’’ after ‘‘Committee’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, or per-
formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac-
complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 
‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 
adopted by the Agency’’; 
(C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘, or per-
formance-enhancing genetic modifications ac-
complished through gene-doping’’ and inserting 
‘‘or prohibited performance-enhancing methods 
adopted by the Agency’’; 
(D) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and the 
prevention of use of performance-enhancing 
drugs, or performance-enhancing genetic modi-
fications accomplished through gene-doping by 
United States amateur athletes; and’’ and in-
serting ‘‘, and the prevention of use by United 
States amateur athletes of performance-enhanc-
ing drugs or prohibited performance-enhancing 
methods adopted by the Agency.’’; and 
(E) by striking paragraph (5). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:37 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5614.IH
H5614
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
Section 703 of title VII of the Office of National 
Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (21 
U.S.C. 2003) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
United States Anti-Doping Agency— 
‘‘(1) for fiscal year 2014, $11,300,000; 
‘‘(2) for fiscal year 2015, $11,700,000; 
‘‘(3) for fiscal year 2016, $12,300,000; 
‘‘(4) for fiscal year 2017, $12,900,000; 
‘‘(5) for fiscal year 2018, $13,500,000; 
‘‘(6) for fiscal year 2019, $14,100,000; and 
‘‘(7) for fiscal year 2020, $14,800,000.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:37 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5614.IH
H5614
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—’’ be-
fore ‘‘The United States’’ the first place it appears,
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN FEDERAL EMPLOY-
EES EMPLOYED AT FEDERAL HYDROELECTRIC FACILI-
TIES LOCATED ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER.—Pay or com-
pensation paid by the United States for personal services
as an employee of the United States at a hydroelectric
facility—
‘‘(1) which is owned by the United States,
‘‘(2) which is located on the Columbia River,
and
‘‘(3) portions of which are within the States of
Oregon and Washington,
shall be subject to taxation by the State of Oregon or any
political subdivision thereof only if such employee is a resi-
dent of such State or political subdivision.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply to pay and compensation paid
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
HR 3168 IH
(1) ACTIONS CONSISTENT WITH SELF-SUPPORT-
ING
ENTITY
STATUS.—The Insurance Corporation
shall conduct its business in a manner consistent
with the requirement of section 5(c).
(2) INSURANCE
CORPORATION
RATING
RE-
QUIREMENT.—The Insurance Corporation shall not
issue any primary insurance or letter of credit with
respect to 1 or more infrastructure facilities unless,
at the time of such issuance, the Insurance Corpora-
tion’s claims-paying ability is then rated by a nation-
ally recognized statistical rating organization at the
highest rating of such organization.
(3) LIMITATION ON REINSURANCE.—The Insur-
ance Corporation may write reinsurance in respect
of all or a portion of a primary insurance policy with
respect to 1 or more infrastructure facilities issued
by a bond insurer if the claims-paying ability of such
insurer is rated, at the time of issuance of such rein-
surance, by a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization at the highest rating of such organiza-
tion.
(4) LIMITATION ON INSURANCE AND OTHER AC-
TIVITIES.—The Insurance Corporation may issue
primary insurance or a letter of credit with respect
to 1 or more infrastructure facilities, except that not
statement, or withholding, concealing, altering, or destroy-
ing a document or other information.’’.
SEC. 4. ENFORCING SENATE SUBPOENA.
Section 1365(a) of title 28, United States Code, is
amended in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Federal Gov-
ernment acting within his official capacity’’ and inserting
‘‘executive branch of the Federal Government acting within
his or her official capacity, except that this section shall
apply if the refusal to comply is based on the assertion of
a personal privilege or objection and is not based on a gov-
ernmental privilege or objection the assertion of which has
been authorized by the executive branch of the Federal Gov-
ernment’’.
SEC. 5. COMPELLING TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY FROM IMMU-
NIZED WITNESS.
Section 6005 of title 18, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or ancillary
to’’ after ‘‘any proceeding before’’; and
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by inserting
‘‘or ancillary to’’ after ‘‘a proceeding before’’
each place that term appears; and
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3163
To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid to a resident of
Washington for services as a Federal employee at a Federal hydroelectric
facility located on the Columbia River.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 26, 1996
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mrs. SMITH of Washington)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
A BILL
To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid
to a resident of Washington for services as a Federal
employee at a Federal hydroelectric facility located on
the Columbia River.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO TAX
COMPENSATION PAID TO CERTAIN FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111 of title 4, United
States Code, is amended—