(3) Congress should have access to information 
regarding the analyses, plans, schedules, technologies, 
cost, performance, and risk of such approach to mis-
sile defense in order to conduct effective oversight. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on the phased, adaptive approach to missile de-
fense in Europe. 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The report under 
paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) A discussion of the analyses conducted 
by the Secretary of Defense preceding the an-
nouncement of the phased, adaptive Approach to 
missile defense in Europe on September 17, 
2009, including— 
(i) a description of any alternatives 
considered; 
(ii) the criteria used to analyze each 
such alternative; and 
(iii) the result of each analysis, includ-
ing a description of the criteria used to 
judge each alternative. 
(B) A discussion of any independent assess-
ments or reviews of alternative approaches to 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
missile defense in Europe considered by the Sec-
retary in support of the announcement of the 
phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in 
Europe on September 17, 2009. 
(C) A description of the architecture for 
each of the four phases of the phased, adaptive 
approach to missile defense in Europe, includ-
ing— 
(i) the composition, basing locations, 
and quantities of ballistic missile defense 
assets, including ships, batteries, intercep-
tors, radars and other sensors, and com-
mand and control nodes; 
(ii) program schedules and site-specific 
schedules with task activities, test plans, 
and knowledge and decision points; 
(iii) technology maturity levels of mis-
sile defense assets and plans for retiring 
technical risks; 
(iv) planned performance of missile de-
fense assets and defended area coverage, in-
cluding sensitivity analysis to various bas-
ing scenarios and varying threat capabili-
ties (including simple and complex threats, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
liquid and solid-fueled ballistic missiles, 
and varying raid sizes); 
(v) operational concepts and how such 
operational concepts effect force structure 
and inventory requirements; 
(vi) total cost estimates and funding 
profiles, by year, for acquisition, fielding, 
and operations and support; and 
(vii) acquisition strategies. 
(3) GAO.—The Comptroller General of the 
United States shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report assessing the report under 
paragraph (1) pursuant to section 232(g) of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 
(Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note). 
(c) LIMITATION ON FUNDS.—Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 301(5) for operation and 
maintenance, Defense-wide, for the Office of the Secretary 
of Defense, not more than 95 percent of such amounts may 
be obligated or expended until the date on which the report 
required under subsection (b)(1) is submitted to the congres-
sional defense committees. 
SEC. 224. HOMELAND DEFENSE HEDGING POLICY. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(1) As noted by the Director of National Intel-
ligence, testifying before the Senate Select Committee 
on Intelligence on February 2, 2010, ‘‘the Iranian re-
gime continues to flout UN Security Council restric-
tions on its nuclear program. . .we judge Iran would 
likely choose missile delivery as its preferred method 
of delivering a nuclear weapon. Iran already has the 
largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle 
East and it continues to expand the scale, reach, and 
sophistication of its ballistic missile forces—many of 
which are inherently capable of carrying a nuclear 
payload.’’. 
(2) The Unclassified Report on Military Power 
of Iran, dated April 2010, states that, ‘‘with sufficient 
foreign assistance, Iran could probably develop and 
test an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) ca-
pable of reaching the United States by 2015. Iran 
could also have an intermediate-range ballistic missile 
(IRBM) capable of threatening Europe.’’. 
(3) Under phase 3 of the phased, adaptive ap-
proach for missile defense in Europe (scheduled for 
2018), the United States plans to deploy the standard 
missile–3 block IIA interceptor at sea- and land-based 
sites in addition to existing missile defense systems to 
provide coverage for all NATO allies in Europe 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
against medium- and intermediate-range ballistic 
missiles. 
(4) Under phase 4 of the phased, adaptive ap-
proach for missile defense in Europe (scheduled for 
2020), the United States plans to deploy the standard 
missile–3 block IIB interceptor to provide additional 
coverage of the United States against a potential 
intercontinental ballistic missile launched from the 
Middle East in the 2020 time frame. 
(5) According to the February 2010 Ballistic 
Missile Defense Review, the United States will con-
tinue the development and assessment of a two-stage 
ground-based interceptor as part of a hedging strategy 
and, as further noted by the Under Secretary of De-
fense for Policy during testimony before the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Representa-
tives on October 1, 2009, ‘‘we keep the development of 
the two-stage [ground-based interceptor] on the books 
as a hedge in case things come earlier, in case there’s 
any kind of technological challenge with the later 
models of the [standard missile–3].’’. 
(b) POLICY.—It shall be the policy of the United States 
to— 
(1) field missile defense systems in Europe 
that— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(A) provide protection against medium- 
and intermediate-range ballistic missile threats 
consistent with NATO policy and the phased, 
adapted approach for missile defense announced 
on September 17, 2009; and 
(B) have been confirmed to perform the as-
signed mission after successful, operationally re-
alistic testing; 
(2) field missile defenses to protect the territory 
of the United States pursuant to the National Missile 
Defense Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–38; 10 U.S.C. 
2431 note) and to test those systems in an operation-
ally realistic manner; 
(3) ensure that the standard missile–3 block IIA 
interceptor planned for phase 3 of the phased, adapt-
ive approach for missile defense is capable of address-
ing intermediate-range ballistic missiles launched 
from the Middle East and the standard missile–3 
block IIB interceptor planned for phase 4 of such ap-
proach is capable of addressing intercontinental bal-
listic missiles launched from the Middle East; and 
(4) continue the development and testing of the 
two-stage ground-based interceptor to maintain it— 
(A) as a means of protection in the event 
that— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(i) the intermediate-range ballistic 
missile threat to NATO allies in Europe 
materializes before the availability of the 
standard missile–3 block IIA interceptor; 
(ii) the intercontinental ballistic mis-
sile threat to the United States that cannot 
be countered with the existing ground-based 
missile defense system materializes before 
the availability of the standard missile–3 
block IIB interceptor; or 
(iii) technical challenges or schedule 
delays affect the standard missile–3 block 
IIA interceptor or the standard missile–3 
block IIB interceptor; and 
(B) as a complement to the missile defense 
capabilities deployed in Alaska and California 
for the defense of the United States. 
SEC. 225. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF THE PLAN FOR 
DEFENSE OF THE HOMELAND AGAINST THE 
THREAT OF BALLISTIC MISSILES. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that section 2 of the Na-
tional Missile Defense Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–38; 10 
U.S.C. 2431 note) states that it is the policy of the United 
States to deploy as soon as is technologically possible an 
effective National Missile Defense system capable of defend-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
ing the territory of the United States against limited bal-
listic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or 
deliberate) with funding subject to the annual authorization 
of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds 
for National Missile Defense. 
(b) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall con-
tract with an independent entity to conduct an assessment 
of the plans of the Secretary for defending the territory of 
the United States against the threat of attack by ballistic 
missiles, including electromagnetic pulse attacks, as such 
plans are described in the Ballistic Missile Defense Review 
submitted to Congress on February 1, 2010, and the report 
submitted to Congress under section 232 of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2232). 
(c) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by sub-
section (b) shall include an assessment of the following: 
(1) The ballistic missile threat, including electro-
magnetic pulse attacks, against which the homeland 
defense elements are intended to defend, including mo-
bile or fixed threats that might arise from non-state 
actors and accidental or unauthorized launches. 
(2) The military requirements for defending the 
territory of the United States against such missile 
threats. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(3) The capabilities of the missile defense ele-
ments available to defend the territory of the United 
States as of the date of the assessment. 
(4) The planned capabilities of the homeland de-
fense elements, if different from the capabilities under 
paragraph (3). 
(5) The force structure and inventory levels nec-
essary to achieve the planned capabilities of the ele-
ments described in paragraph (3) and (4). 
(6) The infrastructure necessary to achieve such 
capabilities, including the number and location of 
operational silos. 
(7) The number of interceptor missiles necessary 
for operational assets, test assets (including develop-
mental and operational test assets and aging and sur-
veillance test assets), and spare missiles. 
(d) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—At or about the same time the 
budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 is sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 
31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report setting 
forth the results of the assessment required by sub-
section (b). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(2) FORM.—The report shall be in unclassified 
form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 226. STUDY ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPA-
BILITIES OF THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall con-
duct a joint capabilities mix study on the ballistic missile 
defense capabilities of the United States. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The study under paragraph (1) shall 
include, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) An assessment of the missile defense capa-
bility, force structure, and inventory sufficiency re-
quirements of the combatant commanders based on 
the threat assessments and operational plans for each 
combatant command. 
(2) A discussion of the infrastructure necessary 
to achieve the ballistic missile defense capabilities, 
force structure, and inventory assessed under para-
graph (1). 
(3) An analysis of mobile and fixed missile de-
fense assets. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—At or about the same time the 
budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 is sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report setting 
forth the results of the study under subsection (a). 
(2) FORM.—The report shall be in unclassified 
form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 227. REPORTS ON STANDARD MISSILE SYSTEM. 
(a) REPORTS.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period there-
after, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the standard missile 
system, particularly with respect to standard missile–3 
block IIA and standard missile–3 block IIB. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The reports under sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
(1) A detailed discussion of the modernization, 
capabilities, and limitations of the standard missile. 
(2) A review of the standard missile’s compari-
son capability against all expected threats. 
(3) A report on the progress of complimentary 
systems, including, at a minimum, radar systems, de-
livery systems, and recapitalization of supporting 
software and hardware. 
(4) Any industrial capacities that must be main-
tained to ensure adequate manufacturing of standard 
missile technology and production ratio. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Subtitle D—Reports 
SEC. 231. REPORT ON ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES AND 
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUND 
COMBAT VEHICLE PROGRAM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than January 15, 
2011, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the con-
gressional defense committees a report on the Ground Com-
bat Vehicle program of the Army. Such report shall in-
clude— 
(1) the results of the analysis of alternatives con-
ducted prior to milestone A, including any technical 
data; and 
(2) an explanation of any plans to adjust the re-
quirements of the Ground Combat Vehicle program 
during the technology development phase of such pro-
gram. 
(b) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classi-
fied annex. 
(c) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Of the 
funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other 
Act for fiscal year 2011 for research, development, test, and 
evaluation, Army, for development of the Ground Combat 
Vehicle, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or ex-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
pended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which 
the report is submitted under subsection (a). 
SEC. 232. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TANK-FIRED 
MUNITIONS. 
(a) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army 
shall conduct a cost benefit analysis of future muni-
tions to be fired from the M1 Abrams series main bat-
tle tank to determine the proper investment to be 
made in tank munitions, including beyond line of 
sight technology. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The cost benefit analysis under 
paragraph (1) shall include— 
(A) the predicted operational performance 
of future tank-fired munitions, including those 
incorporating beyond line of sight technology, 
based on the relevant modeling and simulation of 
future combat scenarios of the Army, including 
a detailed analysis on the suitability of each mu-
nition to address the full spectrum of targets 
across the entire range of the tank (including 
close range, mid-range, long-range, and beyond 
line of sight); 
(B) a detailed assessment of the projected 
costs to develop and field each tank-fired muni-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
tion included in the analysis, including those in-
corporating beyond line of sight technology; and 
(C) a comparative analysis of each tank- 
fired munition included in the analysis, includ-
ing suitability to address known capability gaps 
and overmatch against known and projected 
threats. 
(3) MUNITIONS INCLUDED.—In conducting the 
cost benefit analysis under paragraph (1), the Sec-
retary shall include, at a minimum, the Mid-Range 
Munition, the Advanced Kinetic Energy round, and 
the Advanced Multipurpose Program. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than March 15, 2011, the Sec-
retary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
the cost benefit analysis under subsection (a). 
SEC. 233. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON 
THE VH–(XX) PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER AC-
QUISITION PROGRAM. 
(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—During the period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
on March 1, 2018, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall conduct an annual review of the VH–(XX) air-
craft acquisition program. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of 
each year beginning in 2011 and ending in 2018, the 
Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the review of the VH– 
(XX) aircraft acquisition program conducted under 
subsection (a). 
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report on 
the review of the VH–(XX) aircraft acquisition pro-
gram shall include the following: 
(A) The extent to which the program is 
meeting development and procurement cost, 
schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals. 
(B) With respect to meeting the desired ini-
tial operational capability and full operational 
capability dates for the VH–(XX) aircraft, the 
progress and results of— 
(i) developmental and operational test-
ing of the aircraft; and 
(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in 
aircraft performance, operational effective-
ness, reliability, suitability, and safety. 
(C) An assessment of VH–(XX) aircraft 
procurement plans, production results, and ef-
forts to improve manufacturing efficiency and 
supplier performance. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(D) An assessment of the acquisition strat-
egy of the VH–(XX) aircraft, including whether 
such strategy is in compliance with acquisition 
management best-practices and the acquisition 
policy and regulations of the Department of De-
fense. 
(E) A risk assessment of the integrated mas-
ter schedule and the test and evaluation master 
plan of the VH–(XX) aircraft as it relates to— 
(i) the probability of success; 
(ii) the funding required for such air-
craft compared with the funding pro-
grammed; and 
(iii) development and production con-
currency. 
(3) ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.—In submitting 
to the congressional defense committees the first report 
under paragraph (1) and a report following any 
changes made by the Secretary of the Navy to the 
baseline documentation of the VH–(XX) aircraft ac-
quisition program, the Comptroller General shall in-
clude, with respect to such program, an assessment of 
the sufficiency and objectivity of— 
(A) the analysis of alternatives; 
(B) the initial capabilities document; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(C) the capabilities development document; 
and 
(D) the systems requirement document. 
SEC. 234. JOINT ASSESSMENT OF THE JOINT EFFECTS TAR-
GETING SYSTEM. 
(a) REVIEW.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics shall form a joint assessment team to review 
the joint effects targeting system. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
on which the review under subsection (a) is completed, the 
Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the review. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 241. ESCALATION OF FORCE CAPABILITIES. 
(a) NON-LETHAL DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.—The 
Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Oper-
ational Test and Evaluation and in consultation with the 
Executive Agent for Non-lethal Weapons, shall carry out a 
program to operationally test and evaluate non-lethal 
weapons that provide counter-personnel escalation of force 
options to members of the Armed Forces deploying in sup-
port of a contingency operation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(b) TECHNOLOGY TESTED.—Technologies evaluated 
under subsection (a) shall include crowd control, area de-
nial, space clearing, and personnel incapacitation tools. 
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port that— 
(1) evaluates operational and situational suit-
ability for each non-lethal weapon tested; 
(2) defines the tactics, techniques, and procedures 
approved for deployment of each non-lethal weapon 
by service; 
(3) identifies deployment schemes for each type 
of non-lethal weapon by service; and 
(4) details, by service, the number of units re-
ceiving pre-deployment training on each non-lethal 
weapon and the total number of units trained. 
(d) PROCUREMENT LINE ITEM.—In the budget mate-
rials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense 
in connection with submission to Congress, pursuant to sec-
tion 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for 
fiscal year 2012, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Sec-
retary shall ensure that within each military department 
procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement 
line item is designated for non-lethal weapons. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 242. PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PRO-
TECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND 
DEVELOPMENT OF DEFENSE SYSTEMS. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
carry out a pilot program to develop and incorporate tech-
nology protection features in a designated system during 
the research and development phase of such system. 
(b) FUNDING.—Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by this Act for research, development, test, and eval-
uation, Defense-wide, not more than $5,000,000 may be 
available to carry out this section. 
(c) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than December 31 
of each year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot 
program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report on the pilot program established 
under this section, including a list of each designated sys-
tem included in the program. 
(d) TERMINATION.—The pilot program established 
under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2015. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘designated system’’ means any 
system (including a major system, as defined in sec-
tion 2302(5) of title 10, United States Code) that the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics designates as being included in 
the pilot program established under this section. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(2) The term ‘‘technology protection features’’ 
means the technical modifications necessary to protect 
critical program information, including anti-tamper 
technologies and other systems engineering activities 
intended to prevent or delay exploitation of critical 
technologies in a designated system. 
SEC. 243. PILOT PROGRAM ON COLLABORATIVE ENERGY SE-
CURITY. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense, in co-
ordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall carry out 
a collaborative energy security pilot program involving one 
or more partnerships between one military installation and 
one national laboratory, for the purpose of evaluating and 
validating secure, salable microgrid components and sys-
tems for deployment. 
(b) SELECTION OF MILITARY INSTALLATION AND NA-
TIONAL LABORATORY.—The Secretary of Defense and the 
Secretary of Energy shall jointly select a military installa-
tion and a national laboratory for the purpose of carrying 
out the pilot program under this section. In making such 
selections, the Secretaries shall consider each of the fol-
lowing: 
(1) A commitment to participate made by a 
military installation being considered for selection. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
(2) The findings and recommendations of rel-
evant energy security assessments of military installa-
tions being considered for selection. 
(3) The availability of renewable energy sources 
at a military installation being considered for selec-
tion. 
(4) Potential synergies between the expertise and 
capabilities of a national laboratory being considered 
for selection and the infrastructure, interests, or other 
energy security needs of a military installation being 
considered for selection. 
(5) The effects of any utility tariffs, surcharges, 
or other considerations on the feasibility of enabling 
any excess electricity generated on a military instal-
lation being considered for selection to be sold or oth-
erwise made available to the local community near 
the installation. 
(c) PROGRAM ELEMENTS.—The pilot program shall be 
carried out as follows: 
(1) Under the pilot program, the Secretaries 
shall evaluate and validate the performance of new 
energy technologies that may be incorporated into op-
erating environments. 
(2) The pilot program shall involve collaboration 
with the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
348 
persons or their remains after hostilities have 
ceased)’’; 
(7) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘office’’ and inserting ‘‘designated official’’; 
and 
(8) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) by inserting after ‘‘(A)’’ the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall es-
tablish an activity to account for personnel 
who are missing or whose remains have not 
been recovered from the conflict in which 
they were lost. This activity shall be known 
as the Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Per-
sonnel Office.’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘office’’ both places it 
appears and inserting ‘‘activity’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘to 
the office’’ and inserting ‘‘activity’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (B)(ii)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘to the office’’ and in-
serting ‘‘activity’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘of the office’’ and in-
serting ‘‘of the activity’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00348
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
355 
‘‘§ 138b. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research 
and Engineering’’. 
(C) The heading of section 138c, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(7), is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Oper-
ational Energy Plans and Programs’’. 
(D) The heading of section 138d, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(8), is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138d. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cost Assess-
ment and Program Evaluation’’. 
(E) The heading of section 138e, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(9), is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, 
Chemical, and Biological Defense Pro-
grams’’. 
(F) The heading of section 2228 is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2228. Military equipment and infrastructure: pre-
vention and mitigation of corrosion’’. 
(G) The heading of section 2438 is amended 
to read as follows: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:19 May 22, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00355
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5136.RH
H5136
tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS