datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1493
To revoke an Executive Order relating to procedures for the consideration 
of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presi-
dential records. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Mr. OSE (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 
LATOURETTE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. PAUL, and Ms. WATSON) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Re-
form 
A BILL 
To revoke an Executive Order relating to procedures for 
the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privi-
lege against disclosure of Presidential records.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER OF NO-
VEMBER 1, 2001. 
Executive Order number 13233, dated November 1, 
2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 56025), shall have no force or effect,
mandate. The Ministry may use such assistance to 
support activities such as the following: 
(A) Multiyear women-centered economic 
development programs, including programs to 
assist widows, female heads of household, 
women in rural areas, and disabled women. 
(B) Collaboration with the Ministry of 
Health to construct culturally appropriate 
health infrastructure and delivery of high-qual-
ity comprehensive health care programs, includ-
ing primary, maternal, child, reproductive, and 
mental health care. 
(C) Programs to prevent trafficking in per-
sons, assist victims, and apprehend and pros-
ecute traffickers in persons. 
(2) Direct financial assistance to the National 
Human Rights Commission of Afghanistan. 
(3) Construction of women’s educational facili-
ties in Afghanistan. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$22,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 
2005 and such sums as are necessary for each subsequent 
fiscal year.
developmental abnormalities, trauma, infection, tumors, or 
disease to—
‘‘(1) improve functions; or 
‘‘(2) give the patient a normal appearance, to 
the extent possible, in the judgment of the physician 
performing the surgery. 
‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to require a group health plan or 
health insurance issuer in connection with a group 
health plan to provide coverage for cosmetic surgery. 
‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In paragraph (1), the term 
‘cosmetic surgery’ means surgery that is performed 
to alter or reshape normal structures of the body in 
order to improve appearance.’’. 
(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(i) Section 731(c) of such Act (29 
U.S.C. 1191(c)) is amended by striking 
‘‘section 711’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 711 
and 713’’. 
(ii) Section 732(a) of such Act (29 
U.S.C. 1191a(a)) is amended by striking 
‘‘section 711’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 711 
and 713’’.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1481
To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax 
Freedom Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Growth and 
Freedom Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 
Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 
U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and in-
serting ‘‘2008’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1483
To require certain studies regarding the health effects of exposure to depleted 
uranium munitions, to require the cleanup and mitigation of depleted 
uranium contamination at sites of depleted uranium munition use and 
production in the United States, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. CONYERS, 
Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. LEE, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Com-
merce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period 
to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consider-
ation of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
concerned 
A BILL 
To require certain studies regarding the health effects of 
exposure to depleted uranium munitions, to require the 
cleanup and mitigation of depleted uranium contamina-
tion at sites of depleted uranium munition use and pro-
duction in the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 
‘‘Depleted Uranium Munitions Study Act of 2003’’ .
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of 
this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 
Sec. 2. Findings. 
Sec. 3. Purposes. 
Sec. 4. Study of health effects of exposure to depleted uranium. 
Sec. 5. EPA studies of environmental contamination by depleted uranium. 
Sec. 6. Environmental mitigation and cleanup requirements for depleted ura-
nium.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) The highest regard should be given to the 
health and safety of the members of the United 
States Armed Forces. 
(2) Depleted uranium, a toxic, carcinogenic, 
and 
radioactive 
material 
with 
a 
half-life 
of 
4,500,000,000 years, is used as an ingredient in var-
ious munitions used by the United States Armed 
Forces. 
(3) Depleted uranium munitions were used by 
the United States Armed Forces in 1991 during the 
Persian Gulf War and during the conflicts in the 
former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Bosnia, 
Kosovo, Serbia, and Montenegro) during the 1990s, 
with approximately 300 metric tons of depleted ura-
nium being used during the Persian Gulf War, ap-
proximately three metric tons being used in Bosnia, 
and approximately nine metric tons being used in 
Kosovo, Serbia, and Montenegro.
SEC. 407. EVALUATION AND MONITORING. 
Section 312 of the Family Violence Prevention and 
Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10412) is amended by adding at 
the end the following: 
‘‘(c) Of the amount appropriated under section 
310(a) for each fiscal year, not more than 2 percent shall 
be used by the Secretary for evaluation, monitoring, and 
other administrative costs under this title.’’. 
SEC. 408. FAMILY MEMBER ABUSE INFORMATION AND DOC-
UMENTATION PROJECT. 
Section 313 of the Family Violence Prevention and 
Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10413) is repealed. 
SEC. 409. MODEL STATE LEADERSHIP GRANTS. 
Section 315 of the Family Violence Prevention and 
Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10415) is repealed. 
SEC. 
410. 
NATIONAL 
DOMESTIC 
VIOLENCE 
HOTLINE 
GRANT. 
(a) DURATION.—Section 316(b) of the Family Vio-
lence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10416(b)) 
is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘A grant’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
graph (2), a grant’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following:
claratory or injunctive relief, or for other orders in aid 
of enforcement, in the United States District Court for 
the District of Colorado. 
SEC. 6. JUDICIAL REVIEW. 
Any decision by the Commission that would be sub-
ject to appellate review if it were made by the Adminis-
trator—
(1) shall be subject to appellate review by the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cir-
cuit; and 
(2) may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals 
applying the same standard that would be applicable 
to a decision of the Administrator. 
SEC. 7. DISCLAIMER. 
Nothing in this Act—
(1) modifies any provision of—
(A) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 
seq.); 
(B) Public Law 98–290 (25 U.S.C. 668 
note); or 
(C) any lawful administrative rule promul-
gated in accordance with those statutes; or 
(2) affects or influences in any manner any 
past or prospective judicial interpretation or applica-
tion of those statutes by the United States, the
by contract, the mitigation and cleanup of depleted ura-
nium at each site covered by the report required by section 
5(c). The mitigation and cleanup shall be conducted in the 
manner and scope specified in the report. 
(c) APPLICABILITY
OF NEPA.—The cleanup and 
mitigation required by subsection (b) shall be carried out 
in a manner consistent with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), notwith-
standing any exemption to any of the provisions of that 
Act for the Department of Defense or any element thereof. 
(d) PROGRESS REPORTS.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall submit annual progress reports to the the Adminis-
trator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the 
congressional committees specified in subsection (a) until 
the mitigation and cleanup of depleted uranium at those 
sites covered by the report required by section 5(c) are 
complete.
Æ
1978 (as added by section 1706 of the Tax Reform Act 
of 1986) is repealed. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to periods ending after the date 
of enactment of this Act.
Æ
Tribe, the State, or any Federal, tribal, or State 
court.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1485
To provide additional appropriations for the fiscal year 2003 for the MTCT-
Plus Initiative at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Appropriations 
A BILL 
To provide additional appropriations for the fiscal year 2003 
for the MTCT-Plus Initiative at Columbia University’s 
Mailman School of Public Health.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mother-to-Child Trans-
mission Plus Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2003.’’
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds as follows: 
(1) Any truly effective program to make signifi-
cant inroads in addressing the HIV/AIDS pandemic 
must go beyond just breaking the cycle of trans-
mission of HIV/AIDS from mother-to-child to a pro-
gram that takes care of the whole family after the 
birth of the child (mother-to-child transmission plus, 
or MTCT-Plus). 
(2) For societies to continue providing food, 
education, healthcare, shelter, and other basic neces-
sities of life, saving the child is not enough; contin-
ued care of the mother, father and other adult fam-
ily members is necessary for the child to grow and 
thrive. 
(3) Each year, more than 2.5 million women be-
come infected, more than 500,000 transmit the virus 
to their infants and more than 1.5 million women 
die each year from AIDS. Groundbreaking progress 
has been made in the prevention of mother-to-child 
transmission. However, these programs offer no HIV 
care for the mothers themselves. The tragedy is that 
most of the children saved by MTCT programs are 
likely to be motherless by the time they can walk. 
(4) Columbia University’s Mailman School of 
Public Health, the United Nations, and a coalition 
of private foundations have committed $50 million to 
provide life-long care and treatment to more than 
10,000 women, children, and other family members
in a family-centered care model that can be rep-
licated around the world. 
SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2003. 
(a) APPROPRIATION.—In addition to such sums as 
are otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year 2003, there 
are appropriated $75 million to Columbia University’s 
Mailman School of Public Health for its MTCT-Plus Ini-
tiative, which has committed funds from the cooperation 
of private foundations and the United Nations for the first 
major multi-country, family-centered AIDS treatment pro-
gram for developing countries in Africa and Asia. 
(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, sums appropriated under sub-
section (a) shall remain available until expended.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1488
To restore the standards used for determining whether technical workers 
are not employees as in effect before the Tax Reform Act of 1986. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD (for herself and Mr. ANDREWS) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To restore the standards used for determining whether tech-
nical workers are not employees as in effect before the 
Tax Reform Act of 1986.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Workers 
Fairness Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING 
WHETHER TECHNICAL WORKERS ARE NOT 
EMPLOYEES. 
(a) REPEAL OF SECTION 530(d) OF THE REVENUE 
ACT OF 1978.—Section 530(d) of the Revenue Act of
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 148
To provide that Community Development Block Grant funds relating to 
the recovery of New York City from the September 11, 2001, terrorist 
attacks shall not be subject to Federal taxation. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2003
Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To provide that Community Development Block Grant funds 
relating to the recovery of New York City from the 
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks shall not be sub-
ject to Federal taxation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘September 11th Aid 
Preservation Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL TAXATION FOR CER-
TAIN 
COMMUNITY 
DEVELOPMENT 
BLOCK 
GRANT FUNDS RECEIVED IN RELATION TO 
THE RECOVERY OF NEW YORK CITY AFTER 
THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TERRORIST AT-
TACK. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—No amount shall be includible in 
gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
which is paid from community development block grant 
funds described in subsection (b) to any person for assist-
ance for properties or businesses damaged by, or for eco-
nomic revitalization related to, the September 11, 2001, 
terrorist attacks on New York City. 
(b) FUNDS.—The funds described in this subsection 
are—
(1) amounts appropriated by Public Law 107–
38 and designated by the President for community 
development block grant purposes, 
(2) amounts appropriated by Public Law 107–
117 for the Community Development Fund under 
the heading ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 
URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY PLANNING 
AND
DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT 
FUND’’, and 
(3) amounts appropriated by Public Law 107–
206 for the Community Development Fund under
the heading ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 
URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY PLANNING 
AND
DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT 
FUND’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1490
To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made by the National 
Endowment for the Arts from funds made available for fiscal year 2003. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made 
by the National Endowment for the Arts from funds 
made available for fiscal year 2003.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SEC. 1. REPEALER. 
Section 311(d) of the Department of the Interior and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003 (Pub. L. 108-
7, div. F) is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2), and 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 
paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
This Act and the amendments made by section 1 
shall take effect on October 1, 2002.
Æ
‘‘(B) investigations have determined that ap-
proximately 63 percent of children who were victims 
of maltreatment in 2000 suffered neglect, 19 percent 
suffered physical abuse, 10 percent suffered sexual 
abuse, and 8 percent suffered emotional maltreatment; 
‘‘(3)(A) child abuse can result in the death of a 
child; 
‘‘(B) in 2000, an estimated 1,200 children were 
counted by child protection services to have died as a 
result of abuse or neglect; and 
‘‘(C) children younger than 1 year old comprised 
44 percent of child abuse fatalities and 85 percent of 
child abuse fatalities were younger than 6 years of 
age;’’; 
(4) by striking paragraph (4) (as so redesig-
nated), and inserting the following: 
‘‘(4)(A) many of these children and their fami-
lies fail to receive adequate protection and treatment; 
‘‘(B) slightly less than half of these children (45 
percent in 2000) and their families fail to receive 
adequate protection or treatment; and 
‘‘(C) in fact, approximately 80 percent of all 
children removed from their homes and placed in fos-
ter care in 2000, as a result of an investigation or
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1492
To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to provide expanded access for 
persons in the field of membership of a Federal credit union to money 
order and check cashing services. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Mr. OSE (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. PAUL, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. 
LATOURETTE, Mr. KANJORSKI, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 
A BILL 
To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to provide expanded 
access for persons in the field of membership of a Fed-
eral credit union to money order and check cashing serv-
ices.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanded Access to 
Financial Services Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT AMENDMENT. 
Paragraph (12) of section 107 of the Federal Credit 
Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757(12)) is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(12) in accordance with regulations prescribed 
by the Board—
‘‘(A) to sell, to persons in the field of 
membership, negotiable checks (including trav-
elers checks), money orders, and other similar 
money transfer instruments; and 
‘‘(B) to cash checks and money orders for 
persons in the field of membership for a fee;’’.
Æ
and Executive Order number 12667, dated January 18, 
1989 (54 Fed. Reg. 3403), shall apply by its terms.
Æ
(c) REPORT.—The Secretary shall report to the Con-
gress on the progress of the Secretary in establishing tol-
erances under this section. The report shall include a de-
scription of the research that has been conducted with re-
spect to such tolerances and the research that must be 
conducted before additional tolerances may be established, 
the health significance of the lack of such additional toler-
ances, a timetable for the establishment of such toler-
ances, and the estimated costs, including costs of research, 
associated with the establishment of such tolerances. The 
report shall be transmitted on or about the end of the 18th 
month after the date of enactment of this Act, and bienni-
ally thereafter during the 6-year period that begins on 
such date of enactment.
SEC. 105. STATE AND FEDERAL COOPERATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall work with the 
States in undertaking activities and programs that con-
tribute to the national food safety program so that State 
and Federal programs function in a coordinated and cost-
effective manner. With the assistance provided in sub-
section (b), the Secretary shall encourage States to—
(1) continue, strengthen, or establish State food 
safety programs, especially with respect to the regu-
lation of retail commercial food establishments, 
transportation, harvesting, and fresh markets; and
cent ad valorem for each entry of the subject mer-
chandise, in lieu of any amount that would otherwise 
be ordered. 
SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS. 
If, pursuant to a review under subtitle C of title VII 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675 et seq.) of a 
countervailing duty order described in section 2(3), the 
countervailing duty order is continued, then the amount 
of the countervailing duty required under the order, and 
the amount of the deposit of estimated countervailing du-
ties required for entries of the subject merchandise, shall 
be 80 percent ad valorem for each entry of the subject 
merchandise, in lieu of any amount that would otherwise 
be ordered.
Æ
or not the first sale) after shipment in interstate 
commerce and there is a reasonable probability that 
such article, if consumed, would present a threat to 
public health, as determined by the Secretary, the 
Secretary shall provide the appropriate persons (in-
cluding the manufacturers, importers, distributors, 
or retailers) with an opportunity to—
‘‘(A) cease distribution of such article; 
‘‘(B) notify all persons—
‘‘(i) producing, manufacturing, pack-
ing, processing, preparing, treating, pack-
aging, distributing, or holding such article; 
or 
‘‘(ii) to which such article has been 
distributed, transported, or sold, to imme-
diately cease distribution of such article; 
‘‘(C) recall such article; 
‘‘(D) provide, in consultation with the Sec-
retary, notice to consumers to whom such arti-
cle was, or may have been, distributed; or 
‘‘(E) take any combination of the above 
measures, as appropriate in the circumstances. 
‘‘(2) PRE-HEARING ORDER TO CEASE DISTRIBU-
TION AND GIVE NOTICE.—If such person refuses to 
or does not voluntarily cease distribution, make noti-
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1497
To reauthorize title I of the Sikes Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 27, 2003
Mr. POMBO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the com-
mittee concerned 
A BILL 
To reauthorize title I of the Sikes Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sikes Act Reauthoriza-
tion Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF TITLE I OF SIKES ACT. 
Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is 
amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 1998 through 2003’’
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2004 
through 2008’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 149
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 
direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription drugs. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2003
Mr. NADLER (for himself and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any 
deduction for direct-to-consumer advertisements of pre-
scription drugs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Say No to Drug Ads 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR DIRECT-TO-
CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT OF PRESCRIP-
TION DRUGS. 
(a) GENERAL RULE.—Part IX of subchapter B of 
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
to items not deductible) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 280I. DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT OF 
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 
‘‘No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for 
any amount paid or incurred for a direct-to-consumer ad-
vertisement of a prescription drug.’’
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
for part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
item:
‘‘Sec. 280I. Direct-to-consumer advertisement of prescription 
drugs.’’
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 
December 31, 2002.
Æ