329 
‘‘(5) the project for flood control, Upper White 
Oak Bayou, Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4125).’’. 
SEC. 5113. ONION CREEK, TEXAS. 
In carrying out the study for the project for flood dam-
age reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Onion 
Creek, Texas, the Secretary shall include the costs and bene-
fits associated with the relocation of flood-prone residences 
in the study area for the project in the period beginning 
2 years before the date of initiation of the study and ending 
on the date of execution of the partnership agreement for 
construction of the project to the extent the Secretary deter-
mines such relocations are compatible with the project. The 
Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of relocation of such flood-prone 
residences incurred by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Sec-
retary determines that the relocation of such residences is 
integral to the project. 
SEC. 5114. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended— 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00329
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
330 
(1) by striking ‘‘$20,000,000 for water supply 
and wastewater infrastructure’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$20,000,000 for water 
supply, wastewater infrastructure, and environ-
mental restoration’’; 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of work carried out by the non- 
Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary deter-
mines that the work is integral to the project.’’; 
and 
(3) by aligning the remainder of the text of sub-
paragraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
paragraph (2) of this section). 
SEC. 5115. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall accept funds from the National 
Park Service to restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Vir-
ginia. 
SEC. 5116. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased silta-
tion in Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to de-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00330
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
331 
termine if the siltation is the result of a Federal navigation 
project (including diverted flows from the Columbia River) 
and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation is the 
result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall 
carry out a project to mitigate the siltation as part of main-
tenance of the Federal navigation project. 
SEC. 5117. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and con-
struct a campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at 
Hamilton Island (also know as ‘‘Strawberry Island’’) in 
Skamania County, Washington. 
SEC. 5118. PUGET ISLAND, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary is directed to place dredged and other 
suitable material along portions of the Columbia River 
shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, between river miles 
38 to 47 in order to protect economic and environmental 
resources in the area from further erosion, at a Federal cost 
of $1,000,000. This action shall be coordinated with appro-
priate resource agencies and comply with applicable Fed-
eral laws. 
SEC. 5119. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON. 
Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2675) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘may con-
struct’’ and inserting ‘‘shall construct’’; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00331
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
332 
(2) by inserting ‘‘and ecosystem restoration’’ 
after ‘‘erosion protection’’ each place it appears. 
SEC. 5120. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD 
CONTROL. 
(a) CHEAT AND TYGART RIVER BASINS, WEST VIR-
GINIA.—Section 581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amend-
ed— 
(1) by striking ‘‘flood control measures’’ and in-
serting ‘‘structural and nonstructural flood control, 
streambank protection, stormwater management, and 
channel clearing and modification measures’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘with respect to measures that 
incorporate levees or floodwalls’’ before the semicolon. 
(b) PRIORITY COMMUNITIES.—Section 581(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 
(5); 
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (6) and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek wa-
tershed; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00332
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
333 
‘‘(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty’s Run 
River basin.’’. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 
581(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ‘‘$12,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$90,000,000’’. 
SEC. 5121. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 371) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Nicholas,’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Gilmer,’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(i) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d– 
5b(b)), a non-Federal interest may include for any project 
undertaken under this section a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government. 
‘‘(j) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Ten percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may 
be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to admin-
ister projects under this section at Federal expense.’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00333
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
334 
SEC. 5122. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA. 
(a) CORPS OF ENGINEERS.—Section 340 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 
Stat. 320) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(h) CORPS
OF ENGINEERS.—Ten percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used 
by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
projects under this section at Federal expense.’’. 
(b) SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA DEFINED.—Section 
340(f) of such Act is amended by inserting ‘‘Nicholas,’’ after 
‘‘Greenbrier,’’. 
(c) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Section 340 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is fur-
ther amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(i) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d– 
5b(b)), a non-Federal interest may include for any project 
undertaken under this section a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.’’. 
SEC. 5123. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. 
Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b–13) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(12) PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—The project for 
flood control, Perris, California. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00334
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
335 
‘‘(13) THORNTON RESERVOIR, COOK COUNTY, IL-
LINOIS.—An element of the project for flood control, 
Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois. 
‘‘(14) LAROSE
TO
GOLDEN
MEADOW, 
LOU-
ISIANA.—The project for flood control, Larose to Gold-
en Meadow, Louisiana. 
‘‘(15) BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for 
flood control, Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an al-
ternative to the project authorized by the first section 
of the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938 (52 
Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the Flood 
Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414). 
‘‘(16) HALLS BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for flood 
control, Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative 
to the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and 
tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4610).’’. 
TITLE VI—FLORIDA 
EVERGLADES 
SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLOR-
IDA. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The project for Hillsboro and 
Okeechobee 
Aquifer, 
Florida, 
authorized 
by 
section 
101(a)(16) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00335
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
336 
(113 Stat. 276), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out the project at a total cost of $42,500,000. 
(b) TREATMENT.—Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is 
amended— 
(1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The project for aquifer storage and recovery, 
Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, authorized 
by section 101(a)(16) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), shall be treated for 
purposes of this section as being in the Plan, except 
that operation and maintenance costs of the project 
shall remain a non-Federal responsibility.’’; and 
(2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ‘‘subpara-
graph (B)’’ the following: ‘‘and the project for aquifer 
storage and recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aqui-
fer’’. 
SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS. 
Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding clause (i)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘$69,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$71,200,000’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘$34,500,000’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘$35,600,000’’; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00336
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
337 
(2) in clause (i)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘$6,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$8,200,000’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘$3,000,000’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘$4,100,000’’. 
SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS. 
(a) 
MAXIMUM
COST
OF
PROJECTS.—Section 
601(b)(2)(E) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is amended by inserting ‘‘and section 
(d)’’ before the period at the end. 
(b) MAXIMUM COST OF PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—Sec-
tion 601(c)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by 
adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(C) MAXIMUM COST OF PROGRAM AUTHOR-
ITY.—Section 902 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) shall apply 
to the individual project funding limits in sub-
paragraph (A) and the aggregate cost limits in 
subparagraph (B).’’. 
SEC. 6004. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 
Section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(3) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The following 
project for water resources development and conserva-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00337
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
338 
tion and other purposes is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the report designated in this paragraph: 
‘‘(A) INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SOUTH, FLOR-
IDA.—The project for ecosystem restoration, 
water supply, flood damage reduction, and pro-
tection of water quality, Indian River Lagoon 
South, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated August 6, 2004, at a total cost of 
$1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $682,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $682,500,000. 
‘‘(B) PICAYUNE
STRAND, FLORIDA.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Picayune 
Strand, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated September 15, 2005, at a total cost of 
$375,330,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$187,665,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $187,665,000. 
‘‘(C) SITE 1 IMPOUNDMENT, FLORIDA.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Site 1 Im-
poundment, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engi-
neers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
$80,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:01 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00338
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1495.RH
H1495
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS