IB
Union Calendar No. 289
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4385
[Report No. 103–519]
To amend title 23, United States Code, to designate the National Highway
System, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 11, 1994
Mr. RAHALL (for himself, Mr. MINETA, Mr. SHUSTER, and Mr. PETRI) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public
Works and Transportation
MAY 19, 1994
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 11, 1994]
A BILL
To amend title 23, United States Code, to designate the
National Highway System, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘National Highway System Designation Act of 1994’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
TITLE I—NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION AND OTHER
PROVISIONS
Sec. 101. National Highway System designation.
Sec. 102. Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program.
Sec. 103. Quality improvement.
Sec. 104. Contracting for engineering and design services.
Sec. 105. Highway safety promotion program.
Sec. 106. Project eligibility.
Sec. 107. Wisconsin substitute project.
Sec. 108. Use of recycled paving material.
Sec. 109. Work zone safety.
Sec. 110. Corrected projects.
Sec. 111. Rescissions.
Sec. 112. Additional projects.
Sec. 113. Study of radio and microwave technology for commercial and other
motor vehicles.
Sec. 114. Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency.
Sec. 115. Railway-highway crossings project.
Sec. 116. New River Parkway, West Virginia.
Sec. 117. National recreational trails.
Sec. 118. Coal Heritage.
Sec. 119. Limitations on funding of operating assistance.
Sec. 120. Intercity bus transportation.
Sec. 121. Repeals of existing projects.
Sec. 122. Miscellaneous transit projects.
Sec. 123. Multiyear contract for metro rail project.
Sec. 124. Metric system signing.
Sec. 125. Metropolitan planning.
Sec. 126. Statewide planning.
Sec. 127. High priority corridor feasibility study.
Sec. 128. Reevaluation.
TITLE II—TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO ISTEA AND RELATED
LAWS
Sec. 201. Definitions.
Sec. 202. References to Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense
Highways.
Sec. 203. Federal-Aid Systems.
Sec. 204. Apportionment.
Sec. 205. Programs of projects.
Sec. 206. Advance acquisition of rights-of-way.
Sec. 207. Standards.
Sec. 208. Letting of contracts.
Sec. 209. Prevailing rate of wage.
Sec. 210. Construction.
Sec. 211. Advance construction.
Sec. 212. Maintenance.
Sec. 213. Certification acceptance.
Sec. 214. Availability of funds.
Sec. 215. Federal share.
Sec. 216. Payment to States for construction.
Sec. 217. Relocation of utility facilities.
Sec. 218. Advances to States.
Sec. 219. Emergency relief.
Sec. 220. Applicability of axle weight limitations.
Sec. 221. Toll roads.
Sec. 222. Rail-highway crossings.
Sec. 223. Surface transportation program.
Sec. 224. Metropolitan planning.
Sec. 225. Statewide planning.
Sec. 226. Control of junkyards.
Sec. 227. Nondiscrimination.
Sec. 228. Enforcement of requirements.
Sec. 229. Availability of rights-of-way.
Sec. 230. Highway bridge program.
Sec. 231. Great River Road.
Sec. 232. Hazard elimination program.
Sec. 233. Use of safety belts and motorcycle helmets.
Sec. 234. National maximum speed limit.
Sec. 235. Minimum allocation.
Sec. 236. National minimum drinking age.
Sec. 237. Revocation of drivers’ licenses of individuals convicted of drug offenses.
Sec. 238. Reimbursement for segments of Interstate System constructed without
Federal assistance.
Sec. 239. Federal lands highway program.
Sec. 240. Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkway.
Sec. 241. State Highway Department.
Sec. 242. Management systems.
Sec. 243. State planning and research.
Sec. 244. Appropriation for highway purposes of Federal lands.
Sec. 245. International highway transportation outreach program.
Sec. 246. Highway safety programs.
Sec. 247. National Highway Safety Advisory Committee.
Sec. 248. Alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures.
Sec. 249. Public transit facilities.
Sec. 250. Pensacola, Florida.
Sec. 251. High cost bridge project.
Sec. 252. Congestion relief project.
Sec. 253. High priority corridors on National Highway System.
Sec. 254. High priority corridor project.
Sec. 255. Rural access projects.
Sec. 256. Urban access and mobility projects.
Sec. 257. Innovative projects.
Sec. 258. Intermodal projects.
Sec. 259. Miscellaneous Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
amendments.
Sec. 260. Disadvantaged business enterprise program.
Sec. 261. Amendments to Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assist-
ance Act of 1987.
Sec. 262. Freeway service patrols.
Sec. 263. Pan American Highway.
Sec. 264. Section 3 program amendments.
Sec. 265. Metropolitan planning.
Sec. 266. Formula grant program.
Sec. 267. Mass transit account block grants.
Sec. 268. Grants for research and training.
Sec. 269. General provisions.
Sec. 270. Period of availability and reapportionment of section 16 funds.
Sec. 271. Rural transit program.
Sec. 272. Nondiscrimination.
Sec. 273. Authorizations.
Sec. 274. Project management oversight.
Sec. 275. Planning and research program.
Sec. 276. Needs survey and transferability study.
Sec. 277. State responsibility for rail fixed guideway system.
Sec. 278. National Transit Institute.
Sec. 279. Increased Federal share.
Sec. 280. Performance reports on mass transit systems.
Sec. 281. Cross reference to Federal Transit Act.
Sec. 282. Participation in International Registration Plan and International
Fuel Tax Agreement.
Sec. 283. Intelligent vehicle-highway systems.
Sec. 284. Title 49, United States Code, amendments.
Sec. 285. Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 amendments.
Sec. 286. Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 amendments.
Sec. 287. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio.
Sec. 288. Other Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act technical
amendments.
SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.
In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary
of Transportation.
TITLE 
I—NATIONAL 
HIGHWAY
SYSTEM 
DESIGNATION 
AND
OTHER PROVISIONS
SEC. 101. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION.
(a) DESIGNATION; MODIFICATIONS.—Section 103 of
title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after
subsection (b) the following:
‘‘(c) INITIAL DESIGNATION OF NHS.—The National
Highway System as submitted by the Secretary of Trans-
portation on the map entitled ‘Official Submission, Na-
tional Highway System, Federal Highway Administra-
tion’, and dated May 10, 1994, is hereby designated within
the United States, including the District of Columbia and
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
‘‘(d) MODIFICATIONS TO THE NHS.—
‘‘(1) PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS.—The Secretary
may submit for approval to the Committee on Envi-
ronment and Public Works of the Senate and the
Committee on Public Works and Transportation of
the House of Representatives proposed modifications
to the National Highway System. The Secretary may
only propose a modification under this subsection if
the Secretary determines that such modification meets
the criteria and requirements of subsection (b). Pro-
posed modifications may include new segments and
deletion of existing segments of the National Highway
System.
‘‘(2) APPROVAL
OF
CONGRESS
REQUIRED.—A
modification to the National Highway System may
only take effect if a law has been enacted approving
such modification.
‘‘(3) REQUIRED SUBMISSION.—Not later than 2
years after the date of the enactment of the National
Highway System Designation Act of 1994, the Sec-
retary shall submit under paragraph (1) proposed
modifications to the National Highway System. Such
modifications shall include a list and description of
additions to the National Highway System consisting
of—
‘‘(A) connections to major ports, airports,
international border crossings, public transpor-
tation and transit facilities, interstate bus termi-
nals, rail and other intermodal transportation
facilities; and
‘‘(B) any congressional high priority cor-
ridor or any segment thereof established by sec-
tion 1105 of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2037)
which was not identified on the National High-
way System designated by subsection (c), subject
to the completion of feasibility studies.’’.
(b) PROPOSED NTS.—Not later than 2 years after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit
to Congress a proposal for a comprehensive National Trans-
portation System using the National Highway System as
the backbone for establishing the National Transportation
System. In developing such proposal, the Secretary shall
consult with and consider the views of States and metropoli-
tan planning organizations.
SEC. 102. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IM-
PROVEMENT PROGRAM.
(a) APPORTIONMENT FORMULA.—Section 104(b)(2) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘State’’ each place it appears;
(2) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after
‘‘States’’ the first place it appears;
(3) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘Act’’;
(4) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(5) in subparagraph (C) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(6) in subparagraph (D) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(7) in subparagraph (E) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘subpart’’;
(8) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after ‘‘car-
bon monoxide’’; and
(9) by inserting ‘‘in fiscal year 1994’’ after ‘‘rel-
ative populations’’.
(b) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—Section 149(b) of such title
is amended by inserting before ‘‘of a national ambient’’
each place it appears ‘‘or maintenance’’.
(c) STATES WITHOUT A NONATTAINMENT AREA.—Sec-
tion 149(c) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘in fiscal
year 1994’’ after ‘‘Act’’.
SEC. 103. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
(a) LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.—Section 106 of title
23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
the following:
‘‘(e) LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.—
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish a program to require States to conduct an
analysis of the life-cycle costs of all projects on the
National Highway System.
‘‘(2) ANALYSIS
OF
LIFE-CYCLE
COSTS
DE-
FINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘analysis of life-
cycle costs’ means a process for evaluating the total
economic worth of one or more projects by analyzing
both initial costs as well as discounted future costs,
such as maintenance, reconstruction, rehabilitation,
restoring, and resurfacing costs, over the life of the
project or projects.’’.
(b) VALUE ENGINEERING.—Section 106 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(f) VALUE ENGINEERING FOR NHS.—
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall estab-
lish a program to require States to carry out a value
engineering analysis for all projects on the National
Highway System.
‘‘(2) VALUE ENGINEERING DEFINED.—For pur-
poses of this subsection, the term ‘value engineering
analysis’ means a systematic process of review and
analysis of a project or activity during its design
phase by a multidisciplined team of persons not origi-
nally involved in the project or activity in order to
provide suggestions for reducing the total cost of the
project or activity and providing a project or activity
of equal or better quality. Such suggestions may in-
clude a combination or elimination of inefficient or
expensive parts of the original proposed design for the
project or activity and total redesign of the proposed
project or activity using different technologies, mate-
rials, or methods so as to accomplish the original pur-
pose of the project or activity.’’.
(c) WARRANTIES.—Section 112 of such title is amend-
ed—
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection
(g); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
‘‘(f) WARRANTIES.—Each contract relating to con-
struction of a Federal-aid highway entered into after the
date of the enactment of this subsection shall contain a pro-
vision that requires the contractor to guarantee and war-
rant that the contractor will perform the contractor’s obli-
gations under the contract in accordance with requirements
for Federal-aid highway projects under applicable contract
law.’’.
SEC. 104. CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES.
(a) PERMANENT PROGRAM.—Section 112(b)(2) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
the following new subparagraphs:
‘‘(C) PERFORMANCE
AND
AUDITS.—Any
contract or subcontract awarded in accordance
with subparagraph (A), whether funded in whole
or in part with Federal-aid highway funds, shall
be performed and audited in compliance with
cost principles contained in the Federal acquisi-
tion regulations of part 31 of title 48 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
‘‘(D) INDIRECT
COST
RATES.—Instead of
performing its own audits, a recipient of funds
under a contract or subcontract awarded in ac-
cordance with subparagraph (A) shall accept in-
direct cost rates established in accordance with
the Federal acquisition regulations for 1-year
applicable accounting periods by a cognizant
government agency or independent certified pub-
lic accountant if such rates are not currently
under dispute. Once a firm’s indirect cost rates
are accepted, the recipient of such funds shall
apply such rates for the purposes of contract esti-
mation, negotiation, administration, reporting,
and contract payment and shall not be limited
by administrative or de facto ceilings in accord-
ance with section 15.901(c) of such title 48. A re-
cipient of such funds requesting or using the cost
and rate data described in this subparagraph
shall notify any affected firm before such request
or use. Such data shall be confidential and shall
not be accessible or provided, in whole or in
part, to any other firm or to any government
agency which is not part of the group of agencies
sharing cost data under this subparagraph, ex-
cept by written permission of the audited firm.
If prohibited by law, such cost and rate data
shall not be disclosed under any circumstances.
‘‘(E) STATE
OPTION.—Subparagraphs (C)
and (D) shall take effect 2 years after the date
of the enactment of this subparagraph with re-
spect to all States; except that if a State, during
such 2-year period, adopts by statute an alter-
native process intended to promote engineering
and design quality and ensure maximum com-
petition by professional companies of all sizes
providing engineering and design services, such
subparagraphs shall not apply with respect to
such State.’’.
(b) REPEAL OF PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 1092 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(23 U.S.C. 112 note; 105 Stat. 2024) is repealed.
SEC. 105. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROMOTION PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 23, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 312 the follow-
ing new section:
‘‘§ 313. Highway safety promotion program
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall carry out
education, research, development, and technology transfer
activities to promote the safe operation and maintenance
of commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce.
‘‘(b) GRANTS.—To carry out the purposes of this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall make grants to, and enter into co-
operative agreements with—
‘‘(1) a not-for-profit membership organization
that has been engaged exclusively in truck-related re-
search and education since 1985; and
‘‘(2) not-for-profit organizations engaged in com-
mercial motor vehicle safety research.
‘‘(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs
of activities carried out under this section shall be 100 per-
cent.
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—Out of administrative funds deducted
under section 104(a) of this title for each of fiscal years
1995 through 1997, the Secretary shall make available—
‘‘(1) for making grants and entering into cooper-
ative agreements under subsection (b)(1) $1,000,000;
and
‘‘(2) for making grants and entering into cooper-
ative agreements under subsection (b)(2) $500,000.
Such funds shall remain available until expended.
‘‘(e) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, approval by the Secretary of a grant
under this section shall be deemed a contractual obligation
of the United States for payment of the Federal share of
the grant.
‘‘(f) ANNUAL REPORT.—Annually, beginning on Janu-
ary 1, 1996, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a re-
port which provides information on the progress and activi-
ties of the programs conducted under this section.’’.
(b) CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—The analysis for
chapter 3 of such title is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 312 the following:
‘‘313. Highway safety promotion program.’’.
SEC. 106. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY.
Section 108(b) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of
1956 (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘such costs may be
further’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘, and (2) the amount of such
costs shall not include the portion of the project be-
tween High Street and Causeway Street’’.
SEC. 107. WISCONSIN SUBSTITUTE PROJECT.
(a) FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.—Subsection (b) of section
1045 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1994) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.—
‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—Upon approval of any
substitute project or projects under subsection (a)—
‘‘(A) the costs of construction of the eligible
transitway project for which such project or
projects are substituted shall not be eligible for
funds authorized under section 108(b) of the Fed-
eral-Aid Highway Act of 1956; and
‘‘(B) a sum equal to the amount that would
have been apportioned to the State of Wisconsin
on October 1, 1994, under section 104(b)(5)(A) of
title 23, United States Code, if the Secretary had
not approved such project or projects shall be
available to the Secretary from the Highway
Trust Fund to incur obligations for the Federal
share of the costs of such substitute project or
projects.
‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts made available
under paragraph (1)(B) shall be available for obliga-
tion on and after October 1, 1994. Amounts made
available under paragraph (1)(B) shall remain avail-
able until expended and shall be subject to any limi-
tation on obligations for Federal-aid highways estab-
lished by law.
‘‘(3) APPLICABILITY
OF
TITLE
U.S.C.—
Amounts made available under paragraph (1)(B)
shall be available for obligation in the same manner
as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of
title 23, United States Code; except that the Federal
share of the cost of any project carried out with such
funds shall be determined in accordance with section
103(e)(4)(D) of such title.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) SUBSECTION (c).—The second sentence of
subsection (c) of section 1045 of such Act is amended
by striking ‘‘the authority of section 103(e)(4) of title
23, United States Code,’’ and inserting ‘‘section
21(a)(2) of the Federal Transit Act’’.
(2) SUBSECTION (d)(1).—Subsection (d)(1) of
section 1045 of such Act is amended by striking
‘‘project for’’ and all that follows through the period
at the end thereof and inserting ‘‘transit project.’’.
(3) SUBSECTION (d).—Subsection (d) of section
1045 of such Act is amended by striking paragraph
(3) and by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph
(3).
(c) REDUCTION OF INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION AU-
THORIZATION.—Section 108(b) of the Federal-Aid Highway
Act of 1956 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000,000 for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1996’’ and inserting
‘‘$1,800,000,000, reduced by the amount made available
under section 1045(b)(1)(B) of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 1996’’.
SEC. 108. USE OF RECYCLED PAVING MATERIAL.
(a) DOT GUIDANCE.—Section 1038(c)(1) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23
U.S.C. 109 note) is amended by striking ‘‘an interest in
the use of such asphalt’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘con-
cern in fulfilling the minimum utilization requirements of
subsection (d)(1). Such technology transfer activities and
training programs shall be initiated without delay and
shall include all eligible uses of recycled rubber, alternative
applications, and other materials and shall focus on achiev-
ing the best performance results for all eligible uses. Not
later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this
sentence, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report
detailing the plans to implement this subsection.
(b) STATE CERTIFICATION.—Section 1038(d)(1) of
such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘established by this section.’’ and
inserting ‘‘, other materials, and alternative applica-
tions established by this section. Each State shall also
annually certify its progress in its waste tire abate-
ment program under paragraph (7).’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘1995’’ the first place it appears
and inserting ‘‘1996’’;
(3) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘1994’’ and
inserting ‘‘1995’’;
(4) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘1995’’ and
inserting ‘‘1996’’;
(5) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘and’’
after the semicolon at the end;
(6) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘1996;
and’’ and inserting ‘‘1997.’’; and
(7) by striking subparagraph (D).
(c) OTHER MATERIALS.—Section 1038(d)(2) of such
Act is amended by striking the period at the end and insert-
ing the following: ‘‘; except that, of that amount, no more
than 1⁄2 may be met with the use of asphalt containing re-
claimed asphalt in fiscal years 1996 and 1997. For the pur-
poses of this paragraph, cold in-place recycling technology
shall be allowable.’’.
(d) PENALTY.—Section 1038(d)(4) of such Act is
amended—
(1) by inserting before ‘‘The’’ the following: ‘‘(A)
WITHHOLDING.—’’;
(2) by indenting subparagraph (A), as des-
ignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, and mov-
ing such paragraph 2 ems to the right;
(3) by inserting before ‘‘utilization requirement’’
the following: ‘‘by which such State does not satisfy
the’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) ESCROW
ACCOUNT.—Apportionments
withheld from a State by the Secretary under
this subsection shall be placed in escrow for 2
years pending satisfaction of the minimum utili-
(f) ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION.—Section 1038(d) of
such Act is further amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing:
‘‘(8) ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A State may for any
year meet up to 1⁄2 of the minimum utilization
requirement established by paragraph (1) (ex-
cluding any deduction a State may take pursu-
ant to subsection (c)) by using an equivalent
amount of recycled rubber for alternative appli-
cations, other than making asphalt pavement,
if—
‘‘(i) the State certifies that the alter-
native application does not present a threat
to safety, human health, or the environment;
and
‘‘(ii) it is demonstrated that such alter-
native applications provide equal or en-
hanced engineering benefits.
‘‘(B) GUIDELINES.—The Secretary, in con-
sultation with the Administrator, shall issue
guidelines with respect to compliance with alter-
native applications under the conditions set forth
in clauses (i) and (ii).’’.
(g) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1038(e) of such Act is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(1);
(2) in paragraph (2) by inserting before ‘‘taken’’
the following: ‘‘(other than tire buffings defined as a
byproduct of the retreading industry) or any products
produced from the processing of whole scrap tires or
tire materials’’.
(3) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (2) and inserting a semicolon; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(3) the term ‘alternative applications’ means
uses of recycled rubber in such civil engineering ap-
plications such as noise and safety barriers, other
safety hardware, fences, soil retaining walls, slope sta-
bilization measures, subgrade insulation, and light-
weight fill, where the product or material containing
recycled rubber provides a benefit to the highway con-
struction and is left in place as a result of the high-
way construction; such term does not apply to prod-
ucts or materials, such as traffic cones or vehicles,
which are used only temporarily in construction of
the highway;
‘‘(4) the term ‘Administrator’ means the Admin-
istrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; and
‘‘(5) the term ‘State’ has the meaning such term
has under section 101 of title 23, United States
Code.’’.
SEC. 109. WORK ZONE SAFETY.
Section 1051 of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 401 note) is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘technologies and services,’’ after
‘‘appurtenances,’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘training,’’ after ‘‘traffic control
plans,’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘The Secretary shall annually review, and pro-
vide to State and local governments, information and
recommendations concerning safety practices that can
enhance safety at highway construction sites, includ-
ing information relating to new safety technologies,
services, traffic control plans, training, and work
zone-related bidding practices. The Secretary is di-
rected to develop within the program a process for as-
suring that, for each project, there will be a person
trained and certified who will have the responsibility
and authority for assuring that the provisions of the
traffic control plan and other safety aspects of the
work zone are effectively administered.’’.
SEC. 110. CORRECTED PROJECTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The purpose of this section is to
provide assistance for certain highway projects in order to
correct errors and omissions in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.—The Secretary is
authorized to carry out the projects described in this sub-
section. There is authorized to be appropriated out of the
Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Ac-
count) for fiscal year 1995 to carry out each such project
the amount listed for each such project:
City/State
Projects
Amount in
millions
1.
North Minnesota ...............
Construction and reconstruction of Forest
Highway 11 connecting Aurora-Hoyt Lakes
and Silver Bay, MN.
8.5
2.
Philadelphia, Pennsylva-
nia .................................
Reconstruction of the Old Delaware Avenue
Service Road.
1.6
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable on
account of any project under this section shall be 80 percent
of the cost thereof.
(d) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provi-
sions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall
delegate responsibility for construction of a project or
projects under this section to the State in which such project
or projects are located upon request of such State.
(e) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which
has been delegated responsibility for construction of a
project under this section—
(1) has obligated all funds allocated under this
section for construction of such project; and
(2) proceeds to construct such project without the
aid of Federal funds in accordance with all proce-
dures and all requirements applicable to such project,
except insofar as such procedures and requirements
limit the State to the construction of projects with the
aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it;
the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a
State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost
of construction of the project when additional funds are al-
located for such project under this section.
(f) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized
by this section shall be available for obligation in the same
manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter
1 of title 23, United States Code, except that the Federal
share of the cost of any project under this section shall be
determined in accordance with this section and such funds
shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by
this section shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.
SEC. 111. RESCISSIONS.
(a) RESCISSIONS.—Effective October 1, 1994, the fol-
lowing unobligated balances on September 30, 1994, of
funds made available for the following provisions are hereby
rescinded:
(1) $78,993.92 made available by section 131(c)
of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982.
(2) $26,500,000 made available by section
404(a)(2) of the Surface Transportation Assistance
Act of 1982.
(3) $1,500,000 made available by section
106(a)(1) of the Surface Transportation and Uniform
Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(4) 
$942,249 
made 
available 
for 
section
149(a)(66) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(5) $376,194.94 made available for section
149(a)(111)(C) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(6) $36,979.05 made available for section
149(a)(111)(J) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(7) $34,281.53 made available for section
149(a)(111)(K) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(8) $258,131.85 made available for section
149(a)(111)(L) of the Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(9) 
$446,768 
made 
available 
for 
section
149(a)(92) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(10) $2,058,323 made available for section
149(a)(94) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(11) 
$52,834 
made 
available 
for 
section
149(a)(95) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(12) 
$427,340 
made 
available 
for 
section
149(a)(99) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(13) $3,559,837 made available for section
149(a)(35) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(14) 
$797,800 
made 
available 
for 
section
149(a)(100) of the Surface Transportation and Uni-
form Relocation Assistance Act of 1987.
(15) $55.43 made available by section 149(c)(3)
of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Reloca-
tion Assistance Act of 1987.
(16) $49,700,000 made available by section
1012(b)(6) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991.
(17) $29,300,000 made available by section
1003(a)(7) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991.
(18) $150,000,000 made available by section
1036(d)(1)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(19) $1,500,000 made available by section
1036(d)(1)(B) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991.
(20) $10,800,000 made available by section
21(a)(1) of the Federal Transit Act.
(b) REDUCTIONS IN AUTHORIZED AMOUNTS.—Section
1036(d)(1)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1986) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ the second place
it appears and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘$125,000,000’’ each place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘$62,500,000’’.
SEC. 112. ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.—The Secretary is
authorized to carry out the projects described in this sub-
section. There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years 1995, 1996, and 1997 to carry out each such project
the amounts listed for each such project:
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
1. Alabama ....................
Birmingham Northern Beltline ................................
2.900
2. Alabama ....................
Black Warrior River Bridge Study .........................
0.100
3. Alabama ....................
I–759 Extension ........................................................
20.000
4. Alabama ....................
AL182/1–10 Evacuation Connector Improvements
4.000
5. Alabama ....................
Patton Island Bridge Construction ..........................
9.000
6. Alabama ....................
Montgomery Outer Loop Beltway ............................
3.000
7. Arizona ......................
Gila River Crossing ...................................................
6.000
8. Arizona ......................
US93 Upgrade: Kingman to Lake Mead .................
4.000
9. Arizona ......................
Veterans Memorial Overpass ....................................
5.000
10. Arkansas ....................
US71 Upgrade: Alma to Louisiana Border ............
3.000
11. Arkansas ....................
US71 Upgrade: I–40 to Fayetteville ........................
1.500
2.000
12. Arkansas ....................
US71 Upgrade: Alma to Mena .................................
2.000
13. Arkansas ....................
Lake Bull Shoals Bridge ...........................................
0.400
14. Arkansas ....................
Van Buren Regional Intermodal Facility ...............
0.100
15. Arkansas ....................
US63 Bypass Upgrade, Jonesboro ...........................
5.000
16. Arkansas ....................
Conway Bypass Study and Design .........................
3.000
17. California ..................
CA84/I–580 Interchange Construction ....................
4.000
18. California ..................
CA4 Freeway Expansion, Pittsburg ........................
2.000
19. California ..................
Galena Street Improvements/I–15 Interchange
Construction.
3.000
20. California ..................
CA56 Extension: I–5 to I–15 ...................................
3.000
21. California ..................
Stocker Street/La Cienega Interchange ....................
7.100
22. California ..................
South Lake Tahoe Loop Road Reconfiguration ......
2.000
23. California ..................
Bristol Street Improvement Project .........................
3.000
24. California ..................
CA30 Extension/Gap Closure ...................................
2.000
5.000
25. California ..................
CA87 Corridor Construction ....................................
7.000
26. California ..................
CA113 Railroad Grade Separation .........................
5.240
27. California ..................
Third Feather River Bridge .....................................
1.500
28. California ..................
I–5/Highway 99W Interchange ................................
0.500
29. California ..................
CA113/I–5 Interchange and Improvements ............
0.500
30. California ..................
CA905 Congestion Mitigation ..................................
4.000
5.000
31. California ..................
CA119/US101/Rice Avenue Interchange Upgrade ..
1.000
32. California ..................
Humboldt Bay Port Access Enhancement ...............
10.000
33. California ..................
CA7 Improvements: CA98 to I–8 .............................
2.000
34. California ..................
Ontario Airport Ground Access ...............................
4.000
35. California ..................
CA71 Planning and Design, Riverside County ......
2.000
36. California ..................
CA71 Interchange, Brea ............................................
0.950
37. California ..................
CA41 Expansion ........................................................
3.000
38. California ..................
I–15 Widening: Victorville to Barstow ....................
2.000
14.000
39. California ..................
I–15 Access, George Air Force Base .........................
1.000
40. California ..................
Arden-Garden Connector ..........................................
6.000
41. California ..................
CA126 Improvements: I–5 to McBean Parkway ....
4.000
42. California ..................
CA138–Avenue P–8 Improvements: CA14 to 50th
St, E.
2.000
43. California ..................
CA4 Upgrade .............................................................
19.000
44. California ..................
Mare Island Access Study .........................................
1.000
45. California ..................
CA237—Maude Avenue/Middlefield Road Inter-
change.
13.500
46. California ..................
I–205 Widening: I–580 to I–5 .................................
3.000
47. California ..................
I–710/Firestone Boulevard Interchange ...................
5.800
48. California ..................
CA58 Upgrade, Bakersfield ......................................
2.000
2.500
49. California ..................
CA178 Crosstown Corridor: CA 178 to CA99 .........
2.000
2.500
50. California ..................
I–5 Capacity Enhancement ......................................
9.400
51. California ..................
Alameda Corridor ......................................................
4.000
5.000
52. California ..................
Arbor Vitae Street Expansion ..................................
4.000
53. California ..................
Pacific Coast Highway Palisades Bluff Stabiliza-
tion.
5.000
54. California ..................
US101—Sonoma County Congestion Relief ...........
4.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
55. California ................
US101—Marin County HOV Lanes .......................
1.000
56. Colorado ...................
Powers Boulevard Corridor ......................................
1.000
57. Colorado ...................
120th Avenue Improvements .....................................
5.500
58. Connecticut ..............
Regional Transportation Center Improvements,
Norwich.
6.000
59. Connecticut ..............
Hartford Riverfront Access .......................................
3.000
60. Connecticut ..............
Seaview Avenue Reconstruction ...............................
2.000
61. District of Columbia
Constitution Avenue Rehabilitation ........................
3.000
62. District of Columbia
Independence Avenue Rehabilitation .......................
0.590
63. District of Columbia
First Street Rehabilitation .......................................
0.260
64. Florida .....................
Fuller—Warren Bridge .............................................
2.000
19.000
65. Florida .....................
Jacksonville Airport Access Road ............................
2.000
66. Florida .....................
Midpoint Bridge and Corridor .................................
2.000
5.000
67. Florida .....................
FL7/US441 Widening ...............................................
5.000
68. Florida .....................
I–4/Greeneway Interchange ......................................
4.000
2.000
69. Florida .....................
US301/University Parkway Intersection Upgrade .
2.000
70. Florida .....................
Palm Beach Port Road Relocations .........................
0.265
5.000
71. Florida .....................
Eller Drive/I–595 Improvements .............................
2.600
72. Florida .....................
Northeast Dade Bike Path ........................................
1.135
73. Georgia ....................
GA61 Connector with I–20 .......................................
7.200
74. Georgia ....................
Appalachian Scenic Parkway ..................................
4.000
75. Georgia ....................
GA92 Corridor Upgrade, Cherokee County .............
1.700
20.000
76. Georgia ....................
GA9 Widening, Roswell ............................................
8.300
77. Georgia ....................
Sidney-Lanier Bridge Reconstruction .....................
4.000
6.000
78. Georgia ....................
University Center Pedestrian Corridor, Atlanta ....
12.960
79. Hawaii .....................
Kuakini Street Improvements ..................................
1.500
80. Illinois .....................
Sauget Road Extension .............................................
3.100
0.818
81. Illinois .....................
West Boulevard Extension ........................................
0.900
82. Illinois .....................
IL159 Relocation, Edwardsville ...............................
6,000
83. Illinois .....................
US67/IL267 Improvements ......................................
4.000
84. Illinois .....................
Centennial Bridge Improvements .............................
1.000
85. Illinois .....................
Business Loop 55 Widening: I–55 to Clearwater
Ave.
5.000
86. Illinois .....................
Central Avenue Bypass, Chicago .............................
15.000
87. Illinois .....................
US20 Improvements: East Dubuque to Galena ......
2.000
88. Illinois .....................
Peoria—Chicago Highway .......................................
3.000
2.000
89. Illinois .....................
Springfield Veterans Parkway .................................
2.000
2.000
90. Illinois .....................
Grand View Drive Improvements ............................
3.000
91. Illinois .....................
Heartland Riverfront Project ...................................
2.000
92. Illinois .....................
US67: Macomb to Jacksonville .................................
1.000
93. Illinois .....................
Brush Creek Connector ..............................................
3.000
94. Illinois .....................
Richton Road Improvements, Crete .........................
1.720
95. Illinois .....................
Steger Roadway Improvements, Steger ...................
0.720
96. Illinois .....................
Polk Avenue Extension, Richton Park .....................
0.336
97. Illinois .....................
Minooka Street Improvements, Minooka .................
0.334
98. Illinois .....................
Rathje Road Improvements, Peotone .......................
0.320
99. Illinois .....................
Main Street Improvements, Ottawa ........................
0.312
100. Illinois .....................
Otter Creek Road Improvements, Streator ..............
0.270
101. Indiana ....................
96th Street Upgrade ..................................................
2.000
5.000
102. Indiana ....................
Hoosier Heartland Corridor: Ft. Wayne to Lafay-
ette.
3.000
103. Indiana ....................
I–265 Extension ........................................................
10.000
104. Indiana ....................
US231 Reconstruction ..............................................
10.000
105. Indiana ....................
Evansville—Bloomington Corridor .........................
5.000
106. Indiana ....................
Lafayette Rail Relocation .........................................
5.000
18.500
107. Indiana ....................
Six Points Road Interchange ...................................
1.500
108. Indiana ....................
City of Columbus ‘‘Front Door’’ ..............................
8.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
109. Indiana ....................
IN67 Improvements ...................................................
1.000
110. Indiana ....................
East Chicago Marine Access Road ...........................
4.834
111. Indiana ....................
Lake Shore Drive Extension Study .........................
0.600
112. Iowa .........................
I–29 Corridor Improvements, Sioux City ...............
3.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
113. Iowa .........................
IA330: Marshalltown to Des Moines ........................
6.000
114. Iowa .........................
Burlington Iowa Southern Arterial Connector .......
0.880
115. Iowa .........................
US 63: Bremer County to Minnesota Border .........
3.000
116. Iowa .........................
IA5 Relocation ...........................................................
10.000
117. Kentucky ..................
US231 Relocation ......................................................
5.000
118. Kentucky ..................
US27 Improvements ..................................................
1.000
3.000
119. Kentucky ..................
KY114 Widening: Salyersville to US23 ..................
1.000
5.000
120. Louisiana ................
I–10/I–12 BAton Rouge Bypass ...............................
1.000
121. Louisiana ................
I–210/Nelson Access Road .........................................
3.000
122. Louisiana ................
I–10: St. Charles Parish Line to Tulane Avenue ...
2.000
3.000
123. Maryland .................
MD5/MD373 Interchange .........................................
10.000
124. Maryland .................
MD235 Improvements ...............................................
5.000
125. Maryland .................
MD237 Improvements ...............................................
3.882
126. Maryland .................
Beltway Advanced Traffic Monitoring ....................
3.000
127. Massachusetts ..........
Lincoln Square, Southbridge Street Gateways .......
2.400
128. Massachusetts ..........
I–90/MA146 Reconstruction .....................................
1.600
129. Massachusetts ..........
Franklin County Bikeway ........................................
2.250
130. Michigan ..................
US23 Expansion .......................................................
3.000
131. Michigan ..................
Bay City Road Interchange .....................................
3.000
132. Michigan ..................
M–59 Corridor ...........................................................
20.000
133. Michigan ..................
Highway Safety Improvements ................................
20.000
134. Michigan ..................
Ambassador Bridge Facilities ..................................
10.000
135. Michigan ..................
Monroe Rail Consolidation .......................................
10.000
136. Michigan ..................
Detroit Airport Access Road .....................................
5.000
137. Michigan ..................
US31 Improvements: Holland to Grand Haven .....
1.200
138. Michigan ..................
M–6: Grand Rapids South Beltline Construction ..
6.800
4.000
139. Michigan ..................
M–102/Grand River Interchange Redesign .............
4.000
140. Michigan ..................
McClellan Avenue ......................................................
2.300
141. Michigan ..................
US31 Upgrade, Berrien County ..............................
2.000
5.000
142. Minnesota ................
TH610–Crosstown Expressway ................................
1.000
3.000
143. Minnesota ................
Trunk Highway 33 Improvements ...........................
9.680
144. Minnesota ................
34th Street Corridor ..................................................
2.000
145. Minnesota ................
TH212 Construction .................................................
3.000
146. Minnesota ................
77th Street Improvements .........................................
5.000
10.000
147. Minnesota ................
Wabasha Street Bridge Replacement .......................
9.000
11.000
148. Mississippi ...............
Norrell Road Interchange .........................................
3.000
149. Missouri ...................
Lindbergh Boulevard Relocation ..............................
5.000
150. Missouri ...................
St. Joseph Loop Expressway ....................................
8.300
151. Missouri ...................
Chouteau Bridge Replacement .................................
9.000
152. Missouri ...................
Cape Girardeau Bridge Replacement ......................
6.250
5.000
153. Missouri ...................
MO21 Upgrade ..........................................................
14.400
154. Missouri ...................
MO Highway M Relocation ......................................
4.000
155. Missouri ...................
I–255/MO231 Intersection ........................................
1.600
156. Missouri ...................
Hannibal Bridge Replacement .................................
1.000
157. Montana ..................
MT323 Upgrade .........................................................
5.000
158. Montana ..................
Belgrade/I–90 Interchange ........................................
2.110
159. Nebraska ..................
Niobrara, NE/Springfield, SD Bridge .....................
3.000
160. Nebraska ..................
27th Street and Highway 2 Pedestrian Bridge ......
0.413
161. Nebraska ..................
South and East Beltway Study, Lincoln ................
0.400
162. Nevada .....................
Spring Mountain I–15 Interchange .........................
5.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
163. Nevada .....................
I–80/Sparks Road Pyramid Interchange ................
1.000
4.000
164. New Hampshire ......
Second Nashua River Crossing ................................
3.000
1.500
165. New Hampshire ......
Manchester Airport Access Road Construction .......
5.000
166. New Jersey ...............
I–287 Improvements: I–78 to US22 ........................
4.000
167. New Jersey ...............
NJ21/McCarter Highway Improvements .................
5.000
168. New Jersey ...............
NJ17/NJ4 Interchange, Paramus ............................
3.000
169. New Mexico ..............
Santa Fe Relief Route ...............................................
5.000
170. New Mexico ..............
Sunport Boulevard East Corrdior ...........................
1.400
171. New Mexico ..............
US70/Las Cruces Frontage Road System ...............
3.000
172. New York .................
Utica-Rome Expressway ...........................................
6.250
5.000
173. New York .................
Westchester/Putnam Intelligent Vehicle Highway
Systems.
2.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
174. New York .................
NY60 Reconstruction, Ellicott ..................................
3.000
175. New York .................
Quay Street Extension, Niagara Falls ....................
2.240
176. New York .................
Delaware Street Reconstruction, Tonawanda .........
2.100
177. New York .................
Williams Road Widening, Wheatfield ......................
1.060
178. New York .................
Lockport Corridor Study, Erie and Niagara Coun-
ties.
0.800
179. New York .................
Rochester-Brockport Access Study ............................
0.800
180. New York .................
NY531 Extension Study: Ogden to Sweden ............
0.400
181. New York .................
Jericho Turnpike Improvements: New York City to
Herricks Road.
4.000
2.000
182. New York .................
New York Thruway Upgrade ....................................
5.000
183. New York .................
US9 Reconstruction, Plattsburgh .............................
1.750
184. New York .................
International Bridge Feasibility Study ..................
.250
185. New York .................
New York Intermodal Facilities Study ....................
1.000
186. New York .................
NY277 Reconstruction, Cheektowaga .......................
4.000
187. New York .................
Main Street Bascule Bridge .....................................
2.000
188. New York .................
Bronx/North Manhattan Intelligent Vehicle High-
way System.
6.480
189. New York .................
Latta Road Improvements, Monroe County ............
6.000
190. New York .................
Baldwinsville Bypass ................................................
5.000
191. North Carolina ........
US220 Construction ..................................................
3.000
192. North Carolina ........
US17 Bridge Replacement ........................................
5.000
193. North Carolina ........
Charlotte Beltway East Segment .............................
2.000
194. North Carolina ........
US64 Improvements ..................................................
10.000
195. North Carolina ........
US74 Improvements ..................................................
10.000
196. North Carolina ........
US19/23 Upgrade ......................................................
1.000
197. North Carolina ........
Southern Charlotte Outer Loop ................................
5.000
198. Ohio ..........................
Lorain Central Corridor ...........................................
5.000
199. Ohio ..........................
US23–Fostoria Bypass .............................................
3.000
200. Ohio ..........................
US22/US33–Lancaster Bypass ................................
1.000
5.800
201. Ohio ..........................
Boston Road Interchange ..........................................
2.000
202. Ohio ..........................
Cleveland Gateway Project .......................................
1.000
203. Ohio ..........................
New Intermodal Terminal, Fearing Boulevard ......
5.000
204. Ohio ..........................
US30: OH235 to US68 .............................................
4.000
205. Ohio ..........................
Alum Creek Drive Improvements .............................
2.000
4.000
206. Ohio ..........................
US30 Widening: Wooster to Riceland .....................
3.400
10.000
207. Ohio ..........................
Mt. Vernon to I–71 Connector Study ......................
1.600
208. Ohio ..........................
OH43 Improvements .................................................
3.920
209. Ohio ..........................
Cuyahoga River Bridge, Cleveland ..........................
4.320
210. Ohio ..........................
Cleveland Pedestrian Walkway ................................
1.440
211. Ohio ..........................
Pomeroy to Ravenswood Access Improvements .......
8.900
212. Ohio ..........................
Youngstown-Hubbard Expressway ...........................
10.000
213. Oklahoma .................
I–44 Widening: Arkansas River to Yale Avenue ....
6.250
5.000
214. Oregon ......................
Jordon Cove Road Safety Improvements ................
0.529
215. Oregon ......................
Salem Bypass Improvements ...................................
4.471
216. Oregon ......................
Columbia Slough Intermodal Projects .....................
5.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
217. Pennsylvania ...........
Philadelphia Traffic Signal Controllers ..................
1.800
218. Pennsylvania ...........
Philadelphia Bicycle Network ..................................
0.472
219. Pennsylvania ...........
Tioga Marine Terminal ............................................
8.000
220. Pennsylvania ...........
US15 Upgrade—Tioga County ................................
5.952
221. Pennsylvania ...........
US 219 Truck Route—Osterhout Street ..................
2.880
222. Pennsylvania ...........
PA948 Improvements, Forest County ......................
1.168
223. Pennsylvania ...........
Pennsylvania Pier 98, Philadelphia ........................
1.000
224. Pennsylvania ...........
PA2001 Improvements, Pike County .......................
4.800
0.300
225. Pennsylvania ...........
PA14 Improvements, Bradford County ...................
4.800
226. Pennsylvania ...........
PA3011 Improvements, Scranton ............................
3.500
227. Pennsylvania ...........
PA1069 Widening, Athens ........................................
0.200
1.400
228. Pennsylvania ...........
US219 Improvements, Cambria County .................
10.000
229. Pennsylvania ...........
PA56 Improvements: Johnstown to Cessna .............
8.000
230. Pennsylvania ...........
US 22—Section B07 Reconstruction .......................
8.000
231. Pennsylvania ...........
US219 Improvements: Carrolltown to I–80 ............
1.000
2.000
State
Project name
Authorization
in millions
from highway
trust fund
(other than
mass transit
account)
Authorization
in millions
from general
fund of the
Treasury
232. Rhode Island ...........
Davisville Bridges .....................................................
5.000
233. South Carolina ........
US17 Bridges .............................................................
2.485
1.515
234. South Carolina ........
US301 Improvements ................................................
1.515
235. South Dakota ..........
Vermillion Bridge ......................................................
4.600
236. Tennessee .................
Harding Place Extension .........................................
5.000
237. Tennessee .................
Gay Street Bridge Rehabilitation ............................
5.000
0.760
238. Tennessee .................
Foothills Parkway—Missing Link ...........................
1.250
9.240
239. Tennessee .................
Old Nashville Highway Bridge ................................
4.000
240. Tennessee .................
Murfreesboro Alternative Transportation System ..
1.000
241. Tennessee .................
I–81 Interchange Construction .................................
1.200
242. Tennessee .................
Memphis Outer Loop Beltway ..................................
3.000
243. Texas ........................
TX121 Upgrade Study ..............................................
2.500
244. Texas ........................
Border Highway Extension ......................................
10.000
245. Texas ........................
NASA Road 1 Upgrade .............................................
4.500
15.000
246. Texas ........................
US59 Upgrade, Ft. Bend County ............................
0.500
247. Texas ........................
US67 Widening .........................................................
5.416
248. Texas ........................
Loop 12 Widening .....................................................
2.200
249. Texas ........................
TX36 Improvements ..................................................
5.000
250. Texas ........................
Brownsville Navigation District Access ...................
1.680
251. Texas ........................
Brownsville 6th & 7th Streets Improvements .........
1.600
252. Utah .........................
US89 Upgrade ...........................................................
4.000
253. Utah .........................
I–15/University Avenue Interchange .......................
3.000
254. Utah .........................
20th East Highway Project ......................................
6.000
255. Utah .........................
I–15 Corridor Improvements, Salt Lake County ....
6.000
256. Virgin Islands .........
Christiansted Bypass ................................................
5.000
257. Virginia ...................
Coleman Bridge Expansion ......................................
2.000
258. Virginia ...................
I–95/Outer Connector/VA627 Interchange ...............
2.000
259. Virginia ...................
Coalfields Expressway ...............................................
5.000
260. Virginia ...................
VA123 Philadelphia, Northern Virginia .................
10.000
261. Virginia ...................
Fairfax County Parkway/Franconia-Springfield
Parkway.
5.000
262. Virginia ...................
I–81 to I–40 ‘‘I–83’’ Connector ................................
5.000
263. Virginia ...................
Pinners Point Connector ..........................................
4.400
264. Virginia ...................
S. Battlefield Boulevard/VA168 ...............................
5.000
265. Virginia ...................
14th Street Bridge Lane Addition ...........................
5.000
7.000
266. Washington ..............
I–5/196th Street Interchange ....................................
3.336
267. Washington ..............
WA305 Improvements ...............................................
0.672
268. Washington ..............
Port Angeles Multi-Model Center .............................
6.400
269. Washington ..............
WA18 Improvements: 312th Way to Maple Valley .
4.000
1.000
270. Washington ..............
I–405/Northeast 8th Street Interchange ...................
1.000
271. Washington ..............
US12 Improvements ..................................................
9.000
272. Washington ..............
US395 Improvements ................................................
9.000
273. Washington ..............
Chelan/Douglas Transportation Center ...................
2.000
274. Washington ..............
Mill Plain Extension .................................................
5.000
275. West Virginia ..........
Fairmont Riverside Expressway ..............................
10.000
...................
276. West Virginia ..........
New River Parkway ..................................................
14.400
277. Wisconsin .................
Janesville River Street Realignment .......................
3.454
278. Wisconsin .................
Main Street Bridge Replacement, Racine ...............
2.000
279. Wisconsin .................
CTH P Improvements ...............................................
0.480
280. Wisconsin .................
WI29 Upgrade ...........................................................
10.000
281. Wisconsin .................
Oshkosh Rail Relocation ...........................................
6.000
282. Wisconsin .................
US10 Upgrade: Anderson Road to CTH U ............
4.000
283. Wisconsin .................
US41 Upgrade: Kaukauna to CTH F .....................
...................
3.000
(b) ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES FOR HTF FUNDS.—
65.86 percent of the amount allocated by subsection (a) from
the Highway Trust Fund for each project authorized by sub-
section (a) shall be available for obligation in fiscal year
1995. 17.07 percent of such amount shall be available for
obligation in each of fiscal years 1996 and 1997.
(c) APPROPRIATIONS CAP.—Of the amounts authorized
to be appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury
by subsection (a), not more than $300,000,000 may be ap-
propriated in any single fiscal year.
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable on
account of any project under this section shall be 80 percent
of the cost thereof.
(e) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provi-
sions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall
delegate responsibility for construction of a project or
projects under this section to the State in which such project
or projects are located upon request of such State.
(f) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which
has been delegated responsibility for construction of a
project under this section—
(1) has obligated all funds allocated under this
section for construction of such project; and
(2) proceeds to construct such project without the
aid of Federal funds in accordance with all proce-
dures and all requirements applicable to such project,
except insofar as such procedures and requirements
limit the State to the construction of projects with the
aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it;
the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a
State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost
of construction of the project when additional funds are al-
located for such project under this section.
(g) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized
by this section from the Highway Trust Fund shall be avail-
able for obligation in the same manner as if such funds
were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States
Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of any project
under this section shall be determined in accordance with
this section and such funds shall remain available until ex-
pended. Funds authorized by this section shall not be subject
to any obligation limitation.
SEC. 113. STUDY OF RADIO AND MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY
FOR COMMERCIAL AND OTHER MOTOR VEHI-
CLES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6057 of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
2194) is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as sub-
section (c) and by inserting after subsection (a) the follow-
ing new subsection:
‘‘(b) STUDY OF RADIO AND MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY
FOR COMMERCIAL AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct
a research study to develop and evaluate radio and
microwave technology for furtherance of safety in
commercial and other motor vehicles.
‘‘(2) EQUIPMENT.—Equipment developed under
the study to be conducted under paragraph (1) shall
be directed toward, but not limited to, warning driv-
ers of obstructions in a highway or limited visibility
conditions caused by snow, rain, fog, or dust.
‘‘(3) SAFETY APPLICATIONS.—In conducting the
study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall deter-
mine whether the technology described in paragraph
(1) has other safety applications consistent with the
goals of this Act.’’.
(b) FUNDING.—Such section is further amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—Of the funds made available in fiscal
year 1995 to carry out section 6058(b), $500,000 shall be
used to conduct the study under subsection (b).’’.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is fur-
ther amended—
(1) in the section heading by inserting ‘‘AND
OTHER’’ after ‘‘COMMERCIAL’’; and
(2) in the heading to subsection (a) by inserting
‘‘OF SAFETY TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMERCIAL MOTOR
VEHICLES’’ after ‘‘STUDY’’.
SEC. 
114. 
FOOTHILL/EASTERN 
TRANSPORTATION 
COR-
RIDOR AGENCY.
(a) FEDERAL LINE OF CREDIT.—For the purpose of
carrying out a demonstration of the construction of public
toll roads in Orange County, California, authorized by sec-
tion 129(d) of title 23, United States Code, there is author-
ized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for the Secretary to
enter into an agreement to make a line of credit available,
with a principal amount not to exceed $120,000,000 to the
public entity or entities with the statutory authority to con-
struct such facilities.
(b) EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—The line of credit under this
section shall be available for draws during the period begin-
ning on the date of completion of construction and ending
on the last day of the tenth calendar year following the date
construction of the facilities is completed.
(c) PURPOSES.—The line of credit under this section
shall be available to pay the costs of extraordinary repair
and replacement of the facilities, unexpected Federal or
State environmental restrictions, operation and mainte-
nance expenses of the facilities, and debt service on tax-ex-
empt or taxable obligations financing the facilities.
(d) LIMITATIONS.—
(1) CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES.—With respect to
capital expenditures, draws on the line of credit
under this section shall only be made if and to the
extent proceeds from the sale of the obligations issued
by the public entity or entities which otherwise would
be available for such purposes are exhausted, or are
otherwise unavailable for the payment of such capital
expenditures.
(2) EXPENSES.—With respect to expenses, in-
cluding operation and maintenance expenses and debt
service, a draw on the line of credit under this section
shall only be made if revenues from toll operations
and capitalized interest are insufficient (or are other-
wise unavailable) for such purposes.
(3) PER YEAR.—No more than 10 percent of the
total principal amount of the line of credit under this
section shall be available for draws in any one year.
(4) THIRD PARTY CREDITOR RIGHTS.—No third
party creditor of the public entity or entities shall
have any right against the Federal Government with
respect to draws on the line of credit under this sec-
tion.
(5) AVAILABILITY
FOR
PARTICULAR
COSTS.—
There is no guaranteed availability of proceeds of the
line of credit under this section for the payment of
any particular cost of the public entity or entities
which might be financed under this section.
(e) INTEREST RATE AND REPAYMENT PERIOD.—Any
draws (except for operation and maintenance expenses) on
the line of credit under this section shall accrue interest at
the 30-year United States Treasury bond rate beginning on
the date such draws are made and shall be repaid in not
more than 30 years; except that any draws under the line
of credit for operation and maintenance expenses shall ac-
crue interest at the 3-year United States Treasury note rate
beginning on the date such draws are made and shall be
repaid in not more than 3 years.
SEC. 115. RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS PROJECT.
Of the funds appropriated by Public Law 103–122 for
railroad-highway crossings projects, $20,000,000 shall be
made available for costs, not to exceed 80 percent, of a
project to reduce rail-highway conflicts on M–59 near Pon-
tiac, Michigan, and a project on Bristol Road near Flint,
Michigan. From the $20,000,000 made available under the
preceding sentence, $500,000 shall be made available to im-
prove and upgrade Maple Road at Bishop Airport, Michi-
gan.
SEC. 116. NEW RIVER PARKWAY, WEST VIRGINIA.
(a) PRIORITY CONSIDERATION.—
(1) COMPLETION
OF
STUDIES.—The Secretary
shall require, as a matter of the highest priority, the
completion of all remaining studies associated with
the project authorized by section 149(a)(69) of the
Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation As-
sistance Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 191).
(2) SCHEDULE.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary is authorized and di-
rected to establish a schedule—
(A) for the completion by other Federal
agencies of any reviews required by law of such
studies; and
(B) by which the reconciliation of any dis-
crepancies among reviewing Federal agencies
must be met.
(3) DEADLINE.—The schedule referred to in
paragraph (2) shall provide for the project referred to
in paragraph (1) to proceed to construction before De-
cember 31, 1995.
(b) VISITORS CENTER.—
(1) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make grants
to the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the
Director of the National Park Service, for the plan-
ning, design, and construction of a visitors center,
and such other related facilities as may be determined
to be necessary, to facilitate visitor understanding
and enjoyment of scenic, historic, cultural, and rec-
reational resources accessible by the New River Park-
way, West Virginia, and any related buildings as
may be determined to be necessary for the adminis-
tration of the parkway.
(2) SITE.—The visitors center, related facilities,
and buildings referred to in paragraph (1) shall be lo-
cated at a suitable location on a site for which title
is held by the United States in the vicinity of the
intersection of the New River Parkway and Interstate
Route 64 or along the New River Parkway itself.
(3) CONSULTATION.—The Director of the Na-
tional Park Service shall consult with the New River
Parkway Authority and the State of West Virginia in
the planning, design, and construction of the visitors
center, related facilities, and buildings referred to in
paragraph (1).
(4) FUNDING.—Of the amounts made available
pursuant to section 1003(a)(6)(C) of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 1919) $1,300,000 for fiscal year 1995 and
$1,200,000 for fiscal year 1996 shall be made avail-
able for the purposes of carrying out this subsection.
Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 117. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL TRAILS.
(a) STATE ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1302(c) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (33 U.S.C.
1261(c)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘Act’’ each place it appears and
inserting ‘‘part’’;
(2) in paragraph (2) by striking subparagraph
(B) and redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as
subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(3) SIXTH YEAR PROVISION.—On and after the
date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment
of this part, a State shall be eligible to receive moneys
under this part in a fiscal year only if the State
agrees to expend from non-Federal sources for carry-
ing out projects under this part an amount equal to
20 percent of the amount received by the State under
this part in such fiscal year.’’.
(b) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—Section 1302(d)(1) of
such Act (33 U.S.C. 1261(d)(1)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (C) by striking ‘‘national
surveys’’ and inserting ‘‘a 1-time national survey’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara-
graph (C);
(3) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub-
paragraph (E) and inserting after subparagraph (C)
the following:
‘‘(D) contracting for services with other
land management agencies; and’’; and
(4) by adding the end the following:
‘‘The 3 percent limitation in the preceding sentence
shall not apply to expenditures to pay the cost of con-
ducting the 1-time national survey described in sub-
paragraph (C).’’.
(c) ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1302(e) of such Act
(33 U.S.C. 1261(e)) is amended by redesignating
paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (6),
(7), (8), and (9), respectively, and by inserting after
paragraph (4) the following:
‘‘(5) ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION.—
‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT.—To the extent prac-
ticable and consistent with other requirements of
this section, in complying with paragraph (4), a
State shall give priority to project proposals
which provide for the redesign, reconstruction,
nonroutine maintenance, or relocation of trails
in order to mitigate and minimize the impact to
the natural environment.
‘‘(B) COMPLIANCE.—The State shall receive
guidance for determining compliance with sub-
paragraph (A) from the recreational trail advi-
sory board satisfying the requirements of sub-
section (c)(2)(A).’’.
(2) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
1302(e)(4) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1261(e)(4)) is
amended by striking ‘‘paragraphs (6) and (8)(B)’’
and inserting paragraphs ‘‘(7) and (9)(B)’’.
(d) EXCLUSIONS.—Section 1302(e)(7) of such Act, as
redesignated by subsection (c), is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(7) SMALL STATE EXCLUSION.—
Any State’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘(7) EXCLUSIONS.—
‘‘(A) SMALL STATE.—Any State’’;
(2) by moving the text of subparagraph (A), as
so designated, 2 ems to the right; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) BEST INTEREST OF A STATE.—Any
State which determines based on trail needs
identified in its State Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan that it is in the best interest of
the State to be exempt from the requirements of
paragraph (4) may apply to the Secretary for
such an exemption. Before approving or dis-
approving an application for such an exemption,
the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Reg-
ister notice of receipt of the application and pro-
vide an opportunity for public comment on the
application.’’.
(e) RETURN OF MONEYS NOT EXPENDED.—Section
1302(e)(9) of such Act, as redesignated by subsection (c),
is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘the State’’ before ‘‘may be ex-
empted’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘and expended or committed’’
and all that follows before the period.
(f) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section
1302 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1261) is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘(h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other
than the Mass Transit Account) to carry out this sec-
tion and section 1303 $6,000,000 for fiscal year 1995.
‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds au-
thorized by paragraph (1) shall be available for obli-
gation in the same manner as if the funds were ap-
portioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States
Code; except that the Federal share of the cost of ac-
tivities conducted with such funds shall be as pro-
vided in this section, such funds shall not be subject
to any obligation limitation other than subsection
(d)(3), and such funds shall remain available until
expended.
‘‘(3) TREATMENT.—Funds authorized by para-
graph (1) shall be treated as if such funds were part
of the National Recreational Trails Trust Fund for
purposes of making allocations to the States under
subsection (d).’’.
(g) ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—Section 1303 of such Act
(16 U.S.C. 1262) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘11 members’’
and inserting ‘‘12 members’’;
(2) in subsection (b) by redesignating para-
graphs (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and
(5), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (1)
the following:
‘‘(2) 1 member appointed by the Secretary rep-
resenting individuals with disabilities;’’.
SEC. 118. COAL HERITAGE.
(a) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make grants to the
State of West Virginia for the purpose of erecting signs or
other informational devices depicting Coal Heritage along
public roads identified as ‘‘Heritage Tour Routes’’ and
‘‘Tour Route Connectors’’ on the map entitled ‘‘Alternative
Concept C’’ in the the study entitled ‘‘A Coal Mining Herit-
age Study: Southern West Virginia’’ (1993, United States
Department of the Interior, National Park Service) and
along additional public roads which provide access to the
interpretive sites and areas identified on such map. Such
signs or devices shall be devised by the West Virginia Divi-
sion of Culture and History with the concurrence of the
West Virginia Division of Highways and shall be subject
to public comment.
(b) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—With respect to areas
along the roads referred to in subsection (a) which are ad-
ministered by Federal, State, local, or nonprofit entities,
the Secretary may, pursuant to cooperative agreements with
such entities and in consultation with the State of West Vir-
ginia, provide technical assistance in the development of in-
terpretive devices and information in order to contribute
to public appreciation of the historical, cultural, natural,
scenic, and recreational sites along such roads.
(c) FUNDING.—Of amounts made available pursuant
to section 1047(d) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1998), there shall
be available $1,000,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal
years 1995 and 1996 for the purposes of carrying out this
section. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 119. LIMITATIONS ON FUNDING OF OPERATING AS-
SISTANCE.
Section 9(k)(2) of the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C.
App. 1607a(k)(3)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C)
as subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively;
(2) in subparagraph (E), as redesignated by
paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘INCREASE.—’’ before
‘‘Beginning’’;
(3) in subparagraph (F), as redesignated by
paragraph (1)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
DEFINED.—’’ before ‘‘As’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘(E)’’;
(4) by moving subparagraphs (E) and (F), as re-
designated by paragraph (1), 4 ems to the right; and
(5) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and subparagraph (A) and
inserting the following:
‘‘(2) LIMITATIONS ON FUNDING OF OPERATING
ASSISTANCE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount of funds
apportioned under this section which may be
used for operating assistance shall not exceed 80
percent of the amount of funds apportioned in
fiscal year 1982 under paragraphs (1)(A),
(2)(A), and (3)(A) of section 5(a) of this Act to
an urbanized area with a population of
1,000,000 or more, 90 percent of funds so appor-
tioned to an urbanized area with a population
of 200,000 or more and less than 1,000,000 pop-
ulation; and 95 percent of funds so apportioned
to an urbanized area of less than 200,000 popu-
lation. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence,
an urbanized area that first became an urban-
ized area under the 1980 census or thereafter
may use each fiscal year for operating assistance
not to exceed an amount equal to 2⁄3 of its appor-
tionment during the first full year it received
funds under this section.
‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN URBAN-
IZED AREAS WITH REDUCED POPULATIONS.—If
an urbanized area had a population under the
1980 decennial census of the United States of
more than 1,000,000 and has a population under
the 1990 decennial census of less than 1,000,000,
the maximum percentage of funds which may be
used for operating assistance for purposes of sub-
paragraph (A) shall be 90 percent of the amount
of funds apportioned in fiscal year 1982 under
such paragraphs (1)(A), (2)(A), and (3)(A) to
such area.
‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR URBANIZED AREAS
OF LESS THAN 200,000.—If an urbanized area
had a population under the 1990 decennial cen-
sus of the United States of less than 200,000, 100
percent of the funds apportioned to such area
under this section for each of fiscal years 1995,
1996, and 1997 may be used for operating assist-
ance, notwithstanding any limitation otherwise
imposed on operating assistance.
‘‘(D) OFFSET.—The amount of funds ap-
portioned under this section to each urbanized
area with a population of 200,000 or more in
each of fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997 which
may be used for operating assistance but for this
subparagraph shall be reduced by the amount de-
termined by multiplying—
‘‘(i) the aggregate amount of increases
of operating assistance under subparagraph
(C) in such fiscal year; by
‘‘(ii) the quotient determined by divid-
ing—
‘‘(I) the amount of funds appor-
tioned under this section to such area
in such fiscal year which may be used
for operating assistance but for this
subparagraph; by
‘‘(II) the aggregate amount of
funds apportioned to all urbanized
areas with a population of 200,000 or
more under this section in such fiscal
year but for this subparagraph which
may be used for operating assistance.’’.
SEC. 120. INTERCITY BUS TRANSPORTATION.
(a) BASIC PROGRAM.—Section 18(i)(1) of the Federal
Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1614(i)(1)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘15 percent’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘, and 7.5 percent of such
amounts in fiscal year 1995’’ after ‘‘1994’’; and
(3) by inserting after ‘‘demonstration projects,’’
the following: ‘‘the purchase of accessibility devices,’’.
(b) DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM.—Section 3 of such Act
(49 U.S.C. App. 1602) is amended by adding at the end
the following new subsection:
‘‘(o) INTERCITY
BUS
TRANSPORTATION.—Of the
amounts made available by subsection (k)(1)(C) in each fis-
cal year beginning after September 30, 1994, the Secretary
shall make to operators of intercity bus transportation sys-
tems capital grants to support such systems, including the
purchase of accessibility devices, an amount equal to 7.5
percent of the amounts made available under section 18 in
such fiscal year. The Federal grant for any project under
this subsection shall be 80 percent of the net project cost;
except that the Federal grant for the purchase of accessibil-
ity devices under this subsection shall be 90 percent of the
net project cost.’’.
SEC. 121. REPEALS OF EXISTING PROJECTS.
(a) LONG
BEACH
METRO
LINK
FIXED
RAIL
PROJECT.—Section 3035(o) of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2131) is
repealed.
(b) HONOLULU RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT.—Section
3035(ww) of such Act (105 Stat. 2136) is repealed.
SEC. 122. MISCELLANEOUS TRANSIT PROJECTS.
(a) PORTLAND WESTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—
Section 3035(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2129) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—’’ after
‘‘WESTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—’’
(2) by striking the last sentence;
(3) by indenting paragraph (1) and moving it 2
ems to the right; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) AMENDMENT.—
‘‘(A) NEGOTIATION.—Within 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the
Secretary shall negotiate and sign an amend-
ment to the Westside Light Rail Project
multiyear grant agreement authorized under
paragraph (1) with the Tri-County Metropolitan
Transportation District of Oregon to carry out
the final design and construction of the locally
preferred alternative for the Hillsboro extension,
systems related costs as authorized in Public
Law 102–240, and acquisition of low floor light
rail vehicles, as set forth in Public Law 102–388.
‘‘(B) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION; CONTINGENT
COMMITMENT.—The 
amendment 
negotiated
under this paragraph shall provide for the use of
advance construction authority under section
3(l) of the Federal Transit Act and for the use
of contingent commitment authority under sec-
tion 3(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Transit Act for the
activities set forth in subparagraph (A) for an
amount equivalent to the Federal share author-
ized under section 3 of the Federal Transit Act
for each specific activity; except that the Federal
share of the cost of the final design and construc-
tion of the Hillsboro extension shall not exceed
1⁄3.
‘‘(C) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
ADVANCE
CON-
STRUCTION.—In the event that the Tri-County
Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon
uses advance construction authority under this
paragraph, the Secretary shall convert that au-
thority into a grant and shall reimburse the Tri-
County Metropolitan Transportation District of
Oregon from funds made available under section
3 of the Federal Transit Act in fiscal years 1998
and 1999 for the Federal share of the amounts
expended (plus any eligible financing costs).
‘‘(D) 
INTEGRATED
PROJECT
FINANCING
PLAN.—The amendment negotiated under this
paragraph shall also include an integrated
project financing plan to permit the interchange-
able use of Federal funds for activities set forth
in paragraph (1) and subparagraph (A) to
maintain the entire project construction sched-
ule.
‘‘(3) TREATMENT AS A SINGLE PROJECT.—The
Hillsboro extension to the Westside Light Rail Project
shall be considered by the Federal Transit Adminis-
tration as a single project extending from downtown
Portland, Oregon, to downtown Hillsboro, Oregon, for
the purposes of project review, evaluation, and ap-
proval of construction under section 3(i) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act and for the purpose of preparing a
report under section 3(j) of such Act.’’.
(b) NEW JERSEY URBAN CORE PROJECT.—Section
3031(d) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2122–2123) is amended—
(1) by inserting after ‘‘Hudson River Waterfront
Transportation System’’ the following: ‘‘(including
corridor connections to and within the city of Ba-
yonne)’’; and
(2) by inserting after ‘‘Concourse,’’ the following:
‘‘the West Shore Line,’’.
(c) NORTH BAY FERRY SERVICE.—Section 3035(c) of
such Act (105 Stat. 2129) is amended by striking
‘‘$8,000,000’’ and all that follows through ‘‘1993’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$17,000,000’’.
(d) STATEN ISLAND-MIDTOWN MANHATTAN FERRY
SERVICE.—Section 3035(d) of such Act is amended by
striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and all that follows through ‘‘1993’’
and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’.
(e) CENTRAL AREA CIRCULATOR PROJECT.—Section
3035(e) of such Act is amended by striking the last sentence.
(f) SALT LAKE CITY LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—Section
3035(f) of such Act is amended by inserting after ‘‘includ-
ing’’ the following: ‘‘related high-occupancy vehicle lane,
intermodal corridor design,’’.
(g) LOS ANGELES-SAN DIEGO RAIL CORRIDOR IM-
PROVEMENT PROJECT.—Section 3035(g) of such Act is
amended by striking ‘‘not less than’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.
(h) ADDITIONAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS AND RIGHT-OF-
WAY PURCHASE FOR GILROY SERVICE.—Section 3035(h)
of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 1994’’ and inserting
‘‘September 30, 1996’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘August 1, 1994,’’ and inserting
‘‘October 31, 1996,’’.
(i) DALLAS LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—
(1) MULTIYEAR
GRANT
AGREEMENT.—Section
3035(i) of such Act is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘6.4 miles’’ and inserting
‘‘9.6 miles’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘10 stations’’ and inserting
‘‘not to exceed 14 stations’’;
(C) by striking ‘‘such light rail line’’ and
inserting ‘‘the program of interrelated projects
identified in section 3(a)(8)(C)(vii) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act’’; and
(D) by striking ‘‘of such elements’’ and in-
serting ‘‘element of such program of interrelated
projects’’
(2) PROGRAM OF INTERRELATED PROJECTS.—
Section 3(a)(8)(C)(vii) of the Federal Transit Act (49
U.S.C. App. 1602(a)(8)(C)(vii)) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘Camp Wisdom’’ and inserting ‘‘Interstate Route
20, L.B.J. Freeway’’.
(j) SOUTH BOSTON.—Section 3035(j) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2130–2131) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$278,000,000’’ each place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘$323,000,000’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘the second place it appears’’
after ‘‘striking ‘—’ ’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Funds
made 
available 
for 
the 
South 
Boston 
Piers
Transitway in fiscal year 1994 for alternatives anal-
ysis may also be used for construction.’’.
(k) KANSAS CITY LIGHT RAIL LINE.—Section 3035(k)
of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘$1,500,000 in fiscal
year 1992, and $4,400,000 in fiscal year 1993’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘$5,900,000’’.
(l) DOWNTOWN ORLANDO CIRCULATOR PROJECT.—
Section 3035(l) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$12,000,000’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘for’’ the second place it appears
and all that follows through the period at the end and
inserting ‘‘and the completion of final design, con-
struction, land and equipment acquisition, and relat-
ed activities for the Downtown Orlando Circulator
project.’’.
(m) 
DETROIT
LIGHT
RAIL
PROJECT.—Section
3035(m) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘not less than’’
the first place it appears and all that follows through
‘‘1993,’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.
(n) 
LAKEWOOD-FREEHOLD-MATTAWAN
OR
JAMESBURG RAIL PROJECT.—Section 3035(p) of such Act
is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,800,000’’.
(o) CHARLOTTE LIGHT RAIL STUDY.—Section 3035(r)
of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘$125,000’’ and all that
follows through ‘‘1993’’ and inserting ‘‘$500,000’’.
(p) SAN
DIEGO
MID
COAST
FIXED
GUIDEWAY
PROJECT.—Section 3035(u) of such Act is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading by striking ‘‘LIGHT
RAIL’’ and inserting ‘‘FIXED GUIDEWAY’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘, $2,000,000’’ and all that fol-
lows 
through 
‘‘right-of-way,’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘$42,000,000’’; and
(4) by striking ‘‘Light Rail’’ and inserting
‘‘Fixed Guideway’’.
(q) RAILTRAN COMMUTER RAIL PROJECT.—Section
3035(x) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘$2,480,000’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘1993’’ and inserting ‘‘$8,680,000’’.
(r) EUREKA SPRINGS, ARKANSAS.—Section 3035(z) of
such Act is amended by striking the first sentence and in-
serting the following: ‘‘From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(c) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall
make available $63,600 to Eureka Springs Transit for the
purchase of an alternative fueled vehicle, which is accessible
to and usable by individuals with disabilities.’’.
(s) BALTIMORE-CENTRAL LIGHT RAIL EXTENSION.—
Section 3035(nn) of such Act is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘as follows:
‘‘(A) Not less than $30,000,000 for fiscal
year 1993.
‘‘(B) Not less than $30,000,000 for fiscal
year 1994.’’
and inserting ‘‘and shall be $60,000,000.’’; and
(2) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘as follows’’
and all that follows through the period at the end of
subparagraph 
(C) 
and 
inserting 
‘‘totaling
$160,000,000.’’.
(t) JACKSONVILLE AUTOMATED SKYWAY EXPRESS EX-
TENSION.—Section 3035(vv) of such Act is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(vv) JACKSONVILLE AUTOMATED SKYWAY EXPRESS
EXTENSION.—Not later than December 31, 1994, the Sec-
retary shall negotiate and sign an agreement which modi-
fies the full funding agreement signed on September 27,
1991, with the Jacksonville Transportation Authority for
phase 1–B of the north segment of the Automated Skyway
Express project to make available $15,000,000 in already
appropriated funds and $35,000,000 under section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act to carry out construc-
tion of the locally preferred alternative for an operable seg-
ment of a not to exceed 1.8 mile extension to such project.’’.
(u) DULLES
CORRIDOR
RAIL
PROJECT.—Section
3035(aaa) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘$6,000,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$16,000,000’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘the completion’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘engineering for’’.
(v) CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT
PROJECT.—Section 3035(bbb) of such Act is amended to
read as follows:
‘‘(bbb) CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT
PROJECT.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $300,000,000 for the Central Puget Sound Regional
Transit Project.’’.
(w) CANAL STREET CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL.—Section
3035(fff) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘No later than April 30, 1992,
the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘negotiate’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘includes’’ and inserting ‘‘make available’’;
and
(3) by striking ‘‘$4,800,000’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘statement for’’ and inserting ‘‘$44,800,000
to construct’’.
(x) ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.—
(1) SANTA
CRUZ
BUS
FACILITY
CONSOLIDA-
TION.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $4,120,000 for the Santa Cruz Bus Facility
Consolidation project.
(2) SANTA CRUZ FIXED GUIDEWAY.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$4,750,000 for the Santa Cruz Fixed Guideway
project.
(3) SAN FRANCISCO FERRY BUILDING RENOVA-
TION.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $1,250,000 for the San Francisco Ferry
Building Renovation project.
(4) AC TRANSIT
BUS
IMPROVEMENTS.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$10,000,000 to the Alameda County Transit District
for the purchase of buses.
(5) DENVER
SOUTHWEST
CORRIDOR
LIGHT
RAIL.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $13,000,000 for the Denver Southwest Cor-
ridor Light Rail project.
(6) GRIFFIN
LINE
TRANSITWAY.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$4,900,000 for the Griffin Line Transitway project.
(7) TAMPA
TO
LAKELAND
COMMUTER
RAIL.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the
Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $16,300,000 for the Tampa to Lakeland Com-
muter Rail project.
(8) RAVENSWOOD RAPID TRANSIT LINE.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(A) of the Federal
Transit Act, and before the formula distribution of
funds under such section, the Secretary shall make
available $20,000,000 to the Chicago Transit Author-
ity for the reconstruction of track on the Ravenswood
Rapid Transit line between Kimball Terminal and
Clark Junction and between Armitage Avenue and
Tower 18.
(9) FITCHBURG INTERMODAL FACILITY.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$2,250,000 for the Fitchburg Intermodal Facility.
(10) EAST-WEST TRANSITWAY.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit
Act, the Secretary shall make available $5,000,000 for
the East-West Transitway project in Montgomery
County, Maryland.
(11) MINNEAPOLIS.—From funds provided under
section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Sec-
retary shall make available $20,000,000 for the Min-
nesota Central Corridor Light Rail project.
(12) HOBOKEN
TERMINAL
FACILITY
IMPROVE-
MENTS.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(A) of the Federal Transit Act, and before the
formula distribution of funds under such section, the
Secretary shall make available $8,000,000 to rehabili-
tate the Hoboken Terminal and Yard Complex in Ho-
boken, New Jersey.
(13) WEST
72D
STREET
TRANSIT
STATION.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(A) of the
Federal Transit Act, and before the formula distribu-
tion of funds under such section, the Secretary shall
make available $9,500,000 to refurbish and expand
the West 72d Street Transit Station in New York,
New York.
(14) TREN
URBANO
LIGHT
RAIL
LINE.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$40,000,000 for the Tren Urbano Light Rail project
in Puerto Rico.
(15) MEMPHIS RIVERFRONT LOOP.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$5,900,000 for the Memphis Riverfront Loop Light
Rail project.
(16) DART NORTH CENTRAL LIGHT RAIL EXTEN-
SION.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $18,628,000 for the DART North Central
Light Rail Extension project.
(17) AUSTIN LIGHT RAIL PROJECT.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$5,000,000 for the Austin Light Rail project.
(18) EDMONDS
MULTI-MODAL
CENTER.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$400,000 for fixed guideway improvements in the vi-
cinity of the Edmonds, Washington ferry terminal.
(19) MILWAUKEE BUS PURCHASE.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$10,000,000 to purchase transit buses in Milwaukee
County, Wisconsin.
(20) 
TRI-STATE
TRANSIT
AUTHORITY
PUR-
CHASE.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $3,416,000 to the Tri-State
Transit Authority in Huntington, West Virginia, for
the purchase of transit vehicles, equipment, and relat-
ed right-of-way facility costs.
(21) ALASKA
MARINE
TRANSPORTATION
SYS-
TEM.—Notwithstanding section 3(a) of the Federal
Transit Act, from funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(B), the Secretary shall make available
$20,000,000 to the State of Alaska for the Alaska Ma-
rine Transportation System project.
(22) LONG BEACH BUS PURCHASE.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$3,000,000 to the Long Beach Public Transportation
Company for the purchase of buses and spare parts.
(23) PALM
DESERT
PEOPLE
MOVER.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$5,000,000 for the Palm Desert People Mover Project.
(24) 
LOS
ANGELES/BURBANK/GLENDALE/SAN
FERNANDO VALLEY LIGHT RAIL/INTERMODAL CONNEC-
TION.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B)
$20,000,000 for reconstruction of the Whitehall Ferry
Terminal in New York, New York.
(38) BUFFALO
CROSSROADS
STATION.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Fed-
eral Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$9,000,000 to the Niagara Frontier Transportation
Authority for the Crossroads Station project.
(39) COLUMBUS NORTH CORRIDOR/OSU LINK.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the
Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $10,000,000 for the Columbus North Corridor/
OSU Link project.
(40) BAYFRONT
CENTRE
INTERMODAL
COM-
PLEX.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C)
of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make
available $8,000,000 for the Bayfront Centre Inter-
modal Complex project.
(41) ST. LOUIS
METRO
LINK
EXTENSIONS.—
From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the
Federal Transit Act, the Secretary shall make avail-
able $16,000,000 for the St. Clair extension to the St.
Louis 
Metro 
Link 
light 
rail 
transit 
system,
$2,450,000 for the Cross-County extension to such sys-
tem, and $3,450,000 for the St. Charles extension to
such system.
(42) ALBANY MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FA-
CILITY.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(C), the Secretary shall make available
$590,000 for the multimodal transportation facility
in Albany, Oregon.
(43) MIAMI METRORAIL NORTH CORRIDOR EX-
TENSION.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $15,000,000 for the northern ex-
tension of the Metrorail rapid transit system in
Miami, Florida.
(44) VALPARAISO-CHICAGO COMMUTER CORRIDOR
STUDY.—From 
funds 
provided 
under 
section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $56,000 to determine the feasibil-
ity of restoring commuter rail service between
Valparaiso, Indiana, and Chicago, Illinois.
(45) AREA
TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
OF
NORTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit
Act, the Secretary shall make available $3,434,000 for
construction of a bus maintenance facility in Elk
County, satellite garage in Potter County, and CNG
fueling equipment in DuBois for the Area Transpor-
tation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania.
(46) JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$2,700,000 for the purchase of buses and repair of a
storage and repair facility and associated fuel storage
tanks for the Cambria County Transit Authority,
Pennsylvania.
(47) INDIANA
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.—From
funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$600,000 for the purchase of buses for the Indiana
County Transit Authority, Pennsylvania.
(48) ALTOONA, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$1,200,000 for the purchase of buses and spare parts,
an electronic public information system and capital
improvements to the Altoona Transportation Center
to Altoona Metro Transit, Pennsylvania.
(49) DUBOIS/FALLS
CREEK/SANDY
TOWNSHIP,
PENNSYLVANIA.—From funds provided under section
3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Secretary
shall make available $480,000 for the purchase of
buses and lift-equipped vans for the DuBois/Falls
Creek/Sandy Township Area Transit Authority,
Pennsylvania.
(50) TACOMA EASTERN RAIL.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit
Act, the Secretary shall make available $4,000,000 to
the city of Tacoma, Washington, for the Tacoma
Eastern Rail project from Tacoma to Ashford.
(51) PITTSBURGH
BUSWAY.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(B) of the Federal Transit
Act, the Secretary shall make available $5,036,000 for
the Pittsburgh Busway project.
(52) ILLINOIS BUS PROJECTS.—From funds pro-
vided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit
Act, the Secretary shall make available $5,000,000 for
the purchase of buses in Peoria, Champaign-Urbana,
Rockford, PACE in the suburban area of Chicago,
and other nonurbanized area systems in Illinois.
(53) SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN TRANSIT STATION
AND
TRACK
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(A) of the Federal
Transit Act, and before formula distribution of funds
under such section, the Secretary shall make available
$4,000,000 to make station and track improvements
in Southwest Brooklyn, New York.
(54) WISCONSIN
BUS
PROJECTS.—From funds
provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal
Transit Act, the Secretary shall make available
$2,600,000 for the purchase of buses, vans, and bus-
related facilities to the State of Wisconsin.
(y) 
1996 
OLYMPIC
AND
PARA-OLYMPIC
BUS
GRANTS.—From funds provided under section 3(k)(1)(C) of
the Federal Transit Act in fiscal year 1995, the Secretary
shall transfer $16,000,000 to the program being carried out
under section 9 of such Act to make available $10,400,000
in capital and operating grants for the 1996 Olympic and
Para-Olympic games and $5,600,000 in capital and operat-
ing grants for the 1996 Para-Olympic games. The Federal
share of such grants shall be 100 percent.
(z) CALSTART CONSORTIUM.—From funds provided
under section 3(k)(1)(C) of the Federal Transit Act, the Sec-
retary shall make available $5,000,000 to the CALSTART
Consortium to perform the services described in section
6071(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991.
SEC. 
123. 
MULTIYEAR 
CONTRACT 
FOR 
METRO 
RAIL
PROJECT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3034 of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
2126–2129) is amended—
(1) 
in 
subsection 
(b)(3)(A) 
by 
striking
‘‘$695,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$720,000,000’’;
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(3) the
following:
‘‘(D) SCOPE.—The amended contract under
subparagraph (A) shall provide Federal assist-
ance for the design and construction of an in-
terim operable segment of the East Side Exten-
sion, consisting of a line running generally east
from Union Station of approximately 3.7 miles
in length or in accordance with the East Side
Extension locally preferred alternative, when ap-
proved by the Board of the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
‘‘(E) FUNDING.—The $25,000,000 increase
in authorization provided for Minimum Oper-
able Segment-3 under the National Highway
System Designation Act of 1994 shall be made
available by the Secretary for funding the scope
of the East Side Extension described in subpara-
graph (D). These funds shall be in addition to
the amounts provided for the East Side Exten-
sion in the contract executed in May 1993 pur-
suant to subsection (b) of this section.’’.
(b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3034(i)(3) of such Act is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘7 stations’’ and inserting ‘‘12
stations’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘11.6’’ and inserting ‘‘15.4’’; and
(3) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting
the following:
‘‘(C) One line, known as the East Side Ex-
tension locally preferred alternative, running
generally east from Union Station for approxi-
mately 6.8 miles to the Whittier/Atlantic Sta-
tion, with 6 intermediate stations.’’.
SEC. 124. METRIC SYSTEM SIGNING.
(a) PLACEMENT OF SIGNS.—Before September 30,
1997, the Secretary may not require the States to expend
any Federal or State funds to construct, erect, or other-
wise place any sign relating to any speed limit, distance,
or other measurement on any highway for the purpose of
having such sign establish such speed limit, distance, or
other measurement using the metric system.
(b) MODIFICATION OF SIGNS.—Before September 30,
1997, the Secretary may not require the States to expend
any Federal or State funds to modify any sign relating
to any speed limit, any distance, or other measurement
on any highway for the purpose of having such sign estab-
lish such speech limit, distance, or measurement using the
metric system.
(c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of subsections (a)
and (b), the following definitions apply:
(1) HIGHWAY.—The term ‘‘highway’’ has the
meaning such term has under section 101 of title
23, United States Code.
(2) METRIC SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘metric sys-
tem’’ has the meaning the term ‘‘metric system of
measurement’’ has under section 4 of the Metric
Conversion Act of 1975 (15 U.S.C. 205c).
SEC. 125. METROPOLITAN PLANNING.
Section 134(g)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code,
is amended by inserting after ‘‘transit,’’ the following:
‘‘airport, port, inland waterway,’’.
SEC. 126. STATEWIDE PLANNING.
(a) INTEGRATED STATE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
FACILITIES.—Section 135(e) of title 23, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the
following: ‘‘The plan shall, at a minimum, identify trans-
portation facilities (including major roadways, transit, air-
port, port, inland waterway, and multimodal and inter-
modal facilities) that should function as an integrated
State transportation system, giving emphasis to those fa-
cilities that serve important national and regional trans-
portation functions.’’.
(b) MEETING FUNDING NEEDS OF INTERNATIONAL
BORDER CROSSING COMMUNITIES.—Such section is fur-
ther amended by inserting after the first sentence the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The State plan must consider the special trans-
portation requirements created by international motor ve-
hicle border crossings if applicable to such State.’’.
SEC. 127. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY.
With amounts available to the Secretary under sec-
tion 1105(h) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991, the Secretary in cooperation with
the States of Virginia and West Virginia shall conduct a
study to determine the feasibility of establishing a route
for the East-West Transamerica Corridor (designated pur-
suant to section 1105(c)(3) of such Act) from Beckley,
West Virginia, utilizing a corridor entering Virginia near
the city of Covington then moving south from the Alle-
gheny Highlands to serve Roanoke and continuing east to
Lynchburg. From there such route would continue across
Virginia to the Hampton Roads-Norfolk area.
SEC. 128. REEVALUATION.
(a) INITIATION.—After completion of current con-
struction on Interstate Route 10 and Gessner Road,
Texas, the Secretary shall initiate a reevaluation in con-
sultation with State and local officials of—
(1) a proposed exit ramp from the Sam Hous-
ton Tollway eastbound direct connector to the east-
bound Interstate Route 10 frontage road between
Beltway 8 and Gessner Road; and
(2) a proposed entrance ramp from the
westbound Interstate Route 10 frontage road be-
tween Gessner Road and Beltway 8 to the
westbound direct connector to the Sam Houston
Tollway in Houston, Harris County, Texas.
(b) DEADLINE FOR DECISION.—The Secretary shall
issue a decision on the proposed ramps referred to in sub-
section (a) within 6 months after completion of the con-
struction referred to in subsection (a).
TITLE II—TECHNICAL CORREC-
TIONS TO ISTEA AND RELAT-
ED LAWS
SEC. 201. DEFINITIONS.
Section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking the 1st undesignated paragraph of
such section that relates to public lands highways.
SEC. 202. REFERENCES TO DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER SYS-
TEM OF INTERSTATE AND DEFENSE HIGH-
WAYS.
(a) DECLARATION OF POLICY.—Section 2 of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 1914–1915) is amended—
(1) in the 3d undesignated paragraph by strik-
ing ‘‘National System of’’ and inserting ‘‘Dwight D.
Eisenhower System of’’; and
(2) in the 7th undesignated paragraph by strik-
ing ‘‘Interstate and Defense Highway System’’ and
inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Inter-
state and Defense Highways’’.
(b) COMPLETION OF INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section
1001 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 104 note; 105 Stat. 1915–1916) is
amended in each of subsections (a) and (b) by striking ‘‘Na-
tional’’.
(c) DEFINITION OF INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN TITLE
23.—The undesignated paragraph of section 101(a) of title
23, United States Code, relating to the Interstate System,
is amended by striking ‘‘National’’.
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO VEHICLE WEIGHT
LIMITATIONS.—Section 127(a) of title 23, United States
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘National’’ each place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower’’.
(e) VEHICLE LENGTH RESTRICTION.—Section 411(j)
of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (49
U.S.C. App. 2311(j)) is amended in each of paragraphs (1),
(5)(D), and (6)(A) by striking ‘‘National’’ and inserting
‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower’’.
(f) LONGER COMBINATION VEHICLE DEFINED.—Sec-
tion 4007(f) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2153) is amended by striking
‘‘National’’ and inserting ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower’’.
(g) COMMEMORATION.—Section 6012 of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23
U.S.C. 101 note; 105 Stat. 2180–2181) is amended—
(1) in the section heading by striking ‘‘NA-
TIONAL’’; and
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘National’’.
SEC. 203. FEDERAL-AID SYSTEMS.
(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 103(e)(1) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking the next
to the last sentence.
(b) SUBSTITUTE PROJECTS.—Section 103(e)(4) of
such title is amended—
(1) in the last sentence of subparagraph (B) by
striking ‘‘projects on the Federal-aid secondary sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘surface transportation program
projects’’;
(2) in subparagraph (G) by inserting ‘‘and’’ be-
fore ‘‘$240,000,000’’; and
(3) in subparagraph (J)(i) by inserting a
comma after ‘‘October 1, 1991’’.
SEC. 204. APPORTIONMENT.
(a) SET-ASIDE.—Section 104(a) of title 23, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘for the Federal-aid systems’’ and
inserting ‘‘for this chapter’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘upon the Federal-aid systems’’
and inserting ‘‘under this chapter’’.
(b) CROSS REFERENCE TO INTERSTATE CONSTRUC-
TION PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Section 104(b)(5)(A) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘118(b)(2)’’ and inserting
‘‘118(b)(1)’’.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 104(b)(5)(B) of
such title is amended by striking the comma following
‘‘1984’’ each place it appears.
(d) REPEAL OF URBAN SYSTEM APPORTIONMENT.—
Section 104(b)(6) of such title is repealed.
(e) PLANNING SET-ASIDE.—Section 104(f)(3) of such
title is amended by striking ‘‘(j)’’.
(f) TRANSFERABILITY AMONG SAFETY AND BRIDGE
PROGRAMS.—Section 104(g) of such title is amended by
striking ‘‘Not more than’’ and all that follows through ‘‘any
other of such sections’’ the second place it appears and in-
serting the following: ‘‘Not more than 40 percent of the
amount which is apportioned in any fiscal year to each
State under section 144 or which is reserved for such fiscal
year under section 133(d)(1) only for carrying out section
130 or 152 may be transferred from the apportionment
under section 144 or one of the reservations under section
133(d)(1) to the apportionment or reservation under such
other section if such a transfer is requested by the State
highway department and is approved by the Secretary as
being in the public interest. The Secretary may approve the
transfer of 100 percent of the apportionment under section
144 or one of the reservations under section 133(d)(1) to
the apportionment or reservation under such other section’’.
SEC. 205. PROGRAMS OF PROJECTS.
(a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT.—Section 105 of title
23, United States Code, and the item relating to such sec-
tion in the analysis for chapter 1 of such title are each re-
pealed.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 106(a) of
such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘, as soon as practicable after
program approval,’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘included in an approved pro-
gram’’.
(c) PRIORITY FOR HIGH PRIORITY SEGMENTS OF COR-
RIDORS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.—Section 1105(g)(7)
of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 (105 Stat. 2036) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(7) PRIORITY FOR HIGH PRIORITY SEGMENTS
OF CORRIDORS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.—In se-
lecting projects for inclusion in a plan or program
under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, a
State may give priority to high priority segments of
corridors identified under subsection (c) of this sec-
tion.’’.
SEC. 206. ADVANCE ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 107(a)(2) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘subsection
(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’.
(b) APPORTIONED FUNDS.—Section 108(a) of such
title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘on any Federal-aid highway’’
and inserting ‘‘for any project eligible for assistance
under this chapter’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘on such highway’’ and inserting
‘‘on such project’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘a road’’ and inserting ‘‘the
project’’.
(c) RIGHT-OF-WAY REVOLVING FUND FUNDS.—Sec-
tion 108(c) of such title is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘highways and
passenger transit facilities on any Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘any project eligible for assistance
under this chapter’’; and
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘such project
for the actual construction’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘Secretary’’ the last place it appears and in-
serting ‘‘actual construction of such project on rights-
of-way with respect to which funds are advanced
under this subsection, whichever shall occur first, the
right-of-way revolving fund shall be credited with an
amount equal to the Federal share of the funds ad-
vanced, as provided in section 120 of this title, out
of any funds apportioned under this chapter to the
State in which such project is located and available
for obligation for such projects and the State shall re-
imburse the Secretary’’.
(d) EARLY ACQUISITION.—Section 108(d)(2)(F) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting
‘‘this title’’.
SEC. 207. STANDARDS.
Section 109 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (h) by striking ‘‘Federal-aid
system’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway’’; and
(2) in subsection (q) by striking ‘‘under sections’’
and inserting ‘‘under section’’.
SEC. 208. LETTING OF CONTRACTS.
Section 112(g) of title 23, United States Code, relating
to applicability to contracts for projects on the secondary
system, as redesignated by section 103(c) of this Act, is re-
pealed.
SEC. 209. PREVAILING RATE OF WAGE.
Section 113 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘highway
projects on’’ and all that follows through ‘‘authorized
under’’ and inserting ‘‘highway projects on Federal-
aid highways authorized under’’;
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘upon the Fed-
eral-aid systems,’’ and inserting ‘‘on Federal-aid
highways,’’; and
(3) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘of the Federal-
aid systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway’’.
SEC. 210. CONSTRUCTION.
Section 114 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘highways or
portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway or portion
thereof’’;
(2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘highways or
portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘a Federal-aid highway or por-
tion thereof’’; and
(3) in subsection (b)(3) by striking ‘‘highways or
portions of highways located on a Federal-aid sys-
tem’’ and inserting ‘‘any Federal-aid highway or por-
tion thereof’’.
SEC. 211. ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.
Section 115 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS,’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘PROJECT
AP-
PROVAL’’; and
(2) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘134,’’ and the
second comma after ‘‘144’’.
SEC. 212. MAINTENANCE.
Section 116 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) by inserting ‘‘highway’’ before ‘‘project’’ the
first place it appears in each of subsections (a) and
(c);
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘no longer con-
stitutes a part of a Federal-aid system’’ and inserting
‘‘is no longer a Federal-aid highway’’; and
(3) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘the Federal-aid
secondary system’’ and inserting ‘‘a Federal-aid high-
way’’.
SEC. 213. CERTIFICATION ACCEPTANCE.
Section 117 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘2000(d)’’ and
inserting ‘‘2000d’’; and
(2) by striking subsection (f), relating to dis-
charge of the Secretary’s responsibilities with respect
to the secondary system.
SEC. 214. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.
(a) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Section 118(b)(1) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘Interstate
construction in a State’’ and inserting ‘‘completion of
the Interstate System in a State’’; and
(2) in the second sentence by inserting ‘‘for com-
pletion of the Interstate System’’ after ‘‘shall be allo-
cated’’.
(b) SET-ASIDE
FOR
INTERSTATE
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Section 118(c)(1) of such title is amended by
striking the period at the end of the first sentence and all
that follows through the period at the end of the second sen-
tence and inserting ‘‘for obligation at the discretion of the
Secretary for projects to complete the Interstate System.’’.
(c) SET-ASIDE FOR 4R PROJECTS.—Section 118(c)(2)
of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘of’’ after
‘‘$64,000,000 for each’’.
SEC. 215. FEDERAL SHARE.
(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM PROJECTS.—Section 120(a)
of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting
before ‘‘including a project’’ the following: ‘‘including a
project the cost for which is included in the 1991 interstate
cost estimate and’’.
(b) SAFETY PROJECTS.—Section 120(c) of such title
is amended by striking ‘‘for all the Federal-aid systems’’.
(c) EMERGENCY RELIEF.—The first sentence of section
120(e) of such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘system, including’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘, including a highway on’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘on a project on such system’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘and (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘and
(b)’’; and
(4) by striking ‘‘90 days’’ and inserting ‘‘180
days’’.
(d) PLANNING PROJECTS.—Section 120 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(j) PLANNING PROJECTS.—The Federal share payable
on account of any project to be carried out with funds set
aside under section 104(f) of this title shall be 80 percent
of the costs thereof unless the Secretary determines that the
interest of the Federal-aid highway program would best be
served by decreasing or eliminating the non-Federal share
of such costs.’’.
(e) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 208(2) of the
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of
1966 (42 U.S.C. 3338(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘section
120(a) of title 23, United States Code;’’.
SEC. 216. PAYMENT TO STATES FOR CONSTRUCTION.
Section 121 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘After’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided in this title,
after’’; and
(2) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘Federal-aid
system’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid highway’’.
SEC. 217. RELOCATION OF UTILITY FACILITIES.
Section 123(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘on any Federal-aid system’’ and
inserting ‘‘eligible for assistance under this chapter’’;
and
(2) by striking the last sentence.
SEC. 218. ADVANCES TO STATES.
Section 124(a) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘projects on any of the Federal-aid
systems, including the Interstate System, he’’ and inserting
‘‘a project eligible for assistance under this title, the Sec-
retary’’.
SEC. 219. EMERGENCY RELIEF.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The first sentence of
section 125(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended
by striking all preceding ‘‘Provided’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The Secretary may expend funds from the emer-
gency fund herein authorized for projects for repair or re-
construction on Federal-aid highways in accordance with
the provisions of this chapter:’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 125(b) of
such title is further amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘authorized’’ in the second sen-
tence and all that follows through the period at the
end of such sentence and inserting ‘‘authorized on
Federal-aid highways.’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘the Disaster Relief and Emer-
gency Assistance Act (Public Law 93–288)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act’’.
SEC. 220. APPLICABILITY OF AXLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS.
(a) WISCONSIN STATE ROUTE 78 AND UNITED STATES
ROUTE 51.—Section 127 of title 23, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(f) OPERATION OF CERTAIN SPECIALIZED HAULING
VEHICLES
ON CERTAIN WISCONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If the
104-mile portion of Wisconsin State Route 78 and United
States Route 51 between Interstate Route 94 near Portage,
Wisconsin, and Wisconsin State Route 29 south of Wausau,
Wisconsin, is designated as part of the Interstate System
under section 139(a) of title 23, United States Code, the
single axle, tandem axle, gross vehicle weight, and bridge
formula limits set forth in subsection (a) shall not apply
to the operation on such 104-mile portion of any vehicle
which could legally operate on such 104-mile portion before
the date of the enactment of this subsection.’’.
(b) VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS IN THE STATE OF
OHIO.—
(1) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Transportation
shall review the Federal and State commercial motor
vehicle weight limitations applicable to Federal-aid
highways in the State of Ohio.
(2) WAIVER
AUTHORITY.—If the Secretary of
Transportation determines, on the basis of the review
conducted under paragraph (1), that it is in the pub-
lic interest, the Secretary may waive application of
the vehicle weight limitations of section 127(a) of title
23, United States Code, and of the State certification
requirements of sections 141(b) and 141(c) of such
title, in whole or in part, to highways on the Dwight
D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense
Highways in the State of Ohio for short wheel-base
vehicles for such period as the Secretary determines
may be necessary to permit a reasonable period of de-
preciation for short wheel-base vehicles purchased be-
fore October 1, 1991.
(3) 
MORATORIUM
ON
WITHHOLDING
OF
FUNDS.—Until the Secretary of Transportation makes
a determination relating to the public interest under
paragraph (2), the Secretary shall not withhold funds
under section 127(a) or 141(c) of title 23, United
States Code, from apportionment to the State of Ohio
for failure to comply with such section with respect
to short wheel-base vehicles.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 127 of title
23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘118(b)(1)’’ and
inserting ‘‘118(b)(2)’’; and
(2) in subsection (d)(1)(E) by striking ‘‘July 5,
1991’’ and inserting ‘‘July 6, 1991’’.
SEC. 221. TOLL ROADS.
(a) USE OF REVENUES.—Section 129(a)(3) of title 23,
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘all toll reve-
nues received’’ and all that follows through the period at
the end of the first sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘toll
revenues received from operation of the toll facility will be
used for financing and any other obligations in respect of
the facility, for reserves, for reasonable return to investors
financing the project (as determined by the State), and for
the costs necessary for the proper operation and mainte-
nance of the toll facility, including reconstruction, resur-
facing, restoration, and rehabilitation.’’.
(b) REFERENCE TO FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.—The
last sentence of section 129(a)(4) of such title is amended
by striking ‘‘the Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘Fed-
eral-aid highways’’.
(c) LOANS.—Section 129(a)(7) of such title is amend-
ed—
(1) by inserting ‘‘or commit to loan’’ after
‘‘loan’’ the first place it appears;
(2) by striking ‘‘agency’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘entity’’;
(3) by inserting after ‘‘constructing’’ the first
place it appears ‘‘or proposing to construct’’;
(4) by striking ‘‘all Federal environmental re-
quirements have been complied with and permits ob-
tained’’ and inserting ‘‘the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 has been complied with’’;
(5) by inserting ‘‘to a private entity’’ after ‘‘Any
such loan’’;
(6) by inserting after the fifth sentence the fol-
lowing new sentence: ‘‘Any such loan to a public en-
tity shall bear interest at such rate as the State deter-
mines appropriate.’’; and
(7) by striking ‘‘the time the loan was obligated’’
and inserting ‘‘the date of the initial funding of the
loan’’.
(d) CONSTRUCTION
OF FERRY BOATS
AND FERRY
TERMINAL FACILITIES.—Section 129 of such title is amend-
ed—
(1) in the first sentence of subsection (b) by strik-
ing ‘‘the route of which’’ and all that follows through
the period at the end of such sentence and inserting
‘‘the route of which has been classified as a public
road and has not been designated as a route on the
Interstate System.’’; and
(2) in subsection (c)(4) by striking ‘‘and’’ pre-
ceding ‘‘repair’’.
(e) PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 129(d) of such title is
amended—
(1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (3) by striking
‘‘7’’ and inserting ‘‘9’’;
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘State of Penn-
sylvania’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘States
of Pennsylvania and West Virginia’’; and
(3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘the’’ before
‘‘State of Georgia’’.
(f) TREATMENT OF CENTENNIAL BRIDGE, ROCK IS-
LAND, ILLINOIS, AGREEMENT.—For purposes of section
129(a)(6) of title 23, United States Code, the agreement con-
cerning the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois, en-
tered into under the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing the
city of Rock Island, Illinois, or its assigns, to construct,
maintain, and operate a toll bridge across the Mississippi
River at or near Rock Island, Illinois, and to a place at
or near the city of Davenport, Iowa’’, approved March 18,
1938 (52 Stat. 110), shall be treated as if such agreement
had been entered into under section 129 of title 23, United
States Code, as in effect on December 17, 1991, and may
be modified accordingly.
(g) TREATMENT OF I–95 AND PENNSYLVANIA TURN-
PIKE.—For purposes of section 129 of title 23, United
States Code, the project for construction of an interchange
between Interstate Route 95 and the Pennsylvania Turn-
pike shall be treated as a reconstruction project described
in section 129(a)(1)(B) of such title.
SEC. 222. RAIL-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS.
Section 130 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘Except as pro-
vided in subsection (d) of’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to’’;
(2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘entire’’ each
place it appears;
(3) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘except as pro-
vided in subsection (d) of’’ and inserting ‘‘subject to’’;
(4) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘authorized for
and’’;
(5) in subsection (e) by striking the last sentence;
(6) by striking subsection (f) and redesignating
subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), re-
spectively; and
(7) in subsection (f) as so redesignated by strik-
ing ‘‘railroad highway’’ and inserting ‘‘railroad-high-
way’’.
SEC. 223. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM.
(a) STATE CERTIFICATION.—Section 133 of title 23,
United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘subsections (b)
(3) and (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (b)(3) and
(b)(4)’’;
(2) in subsection (d)(3)(B) by striking ‘‘tobe’’
and inserting ‘‘to be’’; and
(3) in subsection (e)(2) by inserting after ‘‘each
State’’ the following: ‘‘or the designated transpor-
tation authority of the State’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1007(b)(1) of
the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 (105 Stat. 1930) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘104(b)(3)’’ and inserting
‘‘104(b)’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘to read as follows’’ and inserting
‘‘by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new
paragraph’’.
SEC. 224. METROPOLITAN PLANNING.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 134 of title
23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in each of subsections (b)(2), (b)(3), and
(h)(4) by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this
section’’ and inserting ‘‘December 18, 1991’’;
(2) in each of subsections (b)(3)(B) and (g)(2)(B)
by striking ‘‘long-range’’ and inserting ‘‘long range’’;
(3) in subsection (f)(11) by inserting ‘‘passengers
and’’ before ‘‘freight’’;
(4) in subsection (g)(5) by redesignating sub-
paragraphs (i) and (ii) as subparagraphs (A) and
(B); and
(5) in subsection (k) by striking ‘‘the Federal-Aid
Highway Act of 1991’’ and inserting ‘‘this title’’.
(b) FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED.—Section 134(f) of
such title is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraphs:
‘‘(16) Recreational travel and tourism.
‘‘(17) Revitalization of the central urban core.’’.
(c) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Section 134(k) of such title
is amended by striking the last sentence.
(d) CONFORMING CHAPTER ANALYSIS AMENDMENT.—
The analysis for chapter 1 of such title is amended by strik-
ing
‘‘134. Transportation planning in certain urban areas.’’
and inserting
‘‘134. Metropolitan planning.’’.
SEC. 225. STATEWIDE PLANNING.
Section 135 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking paragraph (1)
and inserting the following new paragraph:
‘‘(1) The transportation needs identified through
use of the management systems required by section
303 of this title.’’;
(2) in subsection (c)(5) by inserting after
‘‘nonmetropolitan areas’’ the following: ‘‘, including
the identification of a rural priority local road and
bridge system,’’;
(3) in subsection (c) by striking paragraph (15)
and redesignating paragraphs (16) through (20) as
paragraphs (15) through (19), respectively;
(4) in subsection (c)(18), as so redesignated, by
striking ‘‘commercial motor vehicles’’ and inserting
‘‘passengers and freight’’;
(5) in subsection (d)(3) by striking ‘‘concerns’’
and inserting ‘‘transportation needs’’;
(6) in each of subsections (e) and (f)(1) by in-
serting ‘‘Indian tribal governments,’’ after ‘‘private
providers of transportation,’’; and
(7) in subsection (h)—
100
(A) by striking ‘‘United States Code,’’ and
inserting ‘‘other Federal laws, and’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting
‘‘this title’’; and
(C) by striking ‘‘or section 8 of such Act,’’
and inserting ‘‘of this title, or section 8 of the
Federal Transit Act,’’.
SEC. 226. CONTROL OF JUNKYARDS.
(a) STRICTER STATE STANDARDS.—Section 136(l) of
title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the
Federal-aid highway systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid
highways’’.
(b) PRIMARY SYSTEM DEFINED.—Section 136 of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(n) PRIMARY SYSTEM DEFINED.—For purposes of
this section, the term ‘primary system’ means the Federal-
aid primary system in existence on June 1, 1991, and any
highway which is not on such system but which is on the
National Highway System.’’.
SEC. 227. NONDISCRIMINATION.
(a) STATE ASSURANCES.—Section 140(a) of title 23,
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘any of the
Federal-aid systems’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal-aid high-
ways’’.
101
(b) TRAINING.—Section 140(b) of such title is amend-
ed—
(1) by striking ‘‘for the surface transportation
program’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘the bridge program’’.
SEC. 228. ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS.
Section 141(b) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘the Federal-aid primary system’’ and
all that follows through ‘‘including’’ and inserting ‘‘Fed-
eral-aid highways, including highways on’’.
SEC. 229. AVAILABILITY OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
Section 142 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘the surface’’
and inserting ‘‘surface’’; and
(2) in subsection (f) by striking ‘‘exits’’ and in-
serting ‘‘exists’’.
SEC. 230. HIGHWAY BRIDGE PROGRAM.
(a) SET-ASIDES.—Section 144(g) of title 23, United
States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘103’’ and in-
serting ‘‘1003’’;
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘OFF-SYSTEM
BRIDGES’’ and inserting ‘‘BRIDGES NOT ON FEDERAL-
AID HIGHWAYS’’;
102
(3) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘, other than
those on a Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘that
are functionally classified as local or rural minor col-
lectors’’; and
(4) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘bridges not on
a Federal-aid system’’ and inserting ‘‘such bridges’’.
(b) CROSS REFERENCE.—Section 144(i) of such title
is amended by striking ‘‘307(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘307(h)’’.
(c) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING BRIDGE APPORTION-
MENT CRITERIA.—The criteria for apportionment of funds
used by the Department of Transportation under section
144 of title 23, United States Code, as in effect on Septem-
ber 30, 1991, shall remain in effect until September 30,
1997, or until changed by law, whichever occurs first.
SEC. 231. GREAT RIVER ROAD.
Section 148(a)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘centers of the State’’ and inserting
‘‘centers of the States’’.
SEC. 232. HAZARD ELIMINATION PROGRAM.
Section 152 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘authorized’’
and inserting ‘‘available’’; and
103
(2) by striking subsections (d) and (e) and redes-
ignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections
(d), (e), and (f), respectively.
SEC. 233. USE OF SAFETY BELTS AND MOTORCYCLE HEL-
METS.
(a) REFERENCE TO DATE OF ENACTMENT.—Section
153 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘the date of the
enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘December
31, 1991’’; and
(2) in subsection (i)(3) by striking ‘‘the date of
the enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Decem-
ber 31, 1991,’’.
(b) ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS.—Section 153(f)(2) of
such title is amended by striking ‘‘at all times’’ each place
it appears.
(c) PENALTIES.—Section 153(h) of such title is
amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘at any time
in’’ and inserting ‘‘by the last day of’’;
(2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘by the last
day of fiscal year 1995 or’’ after ‘‘If,’’;
(3) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘1994,’’ and in-
serting ‘‘1995,’’; and
104
(4) in paragraph (4)(A) by striking ‘‘under sec-
tion 402’’ and inserting ‘‘by this subsection’’.
(d) DEFINITIONS.—Section 153(i) of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(5) STATE.—The term ‘State’ has the meaning
such term has under chapter 4 of this title.’’.
SEC. 234. NATIONAL MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT.
(a) EXISTING PROGRAM.—Section 154(a)(1) of title
23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘on the
Interstate System’’ and all that follows through ‘‘or more’’
and inserting ‘‘described in clause (2) or (3) of this sub-
section’’.
(b) NEW PROGRAM.—Section 1029 of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
1968–1970) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1)(A) by inserting ‘‘of a
State’’ after ‘‘apportionments’’;
(2) in subsection (c)(1)(A) by striking ‘‘if a
State’’ and inserting ‘‘to the apportionment of the
State under section 402 of such title if the State’’;
(3) in subsection (c) by redesignating para-
graphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respec-
tively; and
(4) by inserting after paragraph (1) of sub-
section (c) the following new paragraph:
105
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(A) GENERAL RULE.—A State must obli-
gate at least 50 percent of its funds transferred
pursuant to this subsection for a fiscal year for
speed limit enforcement and public information
and education.
‘‘(B) WAIVER.—Upon request of a State, the
Secretary may waive the requirement of sub-
paragraph (A) for any fiscal year if in the pre-
ceding fiscal year the State was in compliance
with the speed limit requirements established
pursuant to paragraph (1).’’.
SEC. 235. MINIMUM ALLOCATION.
Section 157 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ‘‘118(b)(2)’’
and inserting ‘‘118(b)(1)’’;
(2) in subsection (a)(3)(A) by striking ‘‘year
1989’’ and inserting ‘‘years 1989’’; and
(3) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating
subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (c) and (d), re-
spectively.
SEC. 236. NATIONAL MINIMUM DRINKING AGE.
Section 158 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
106
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘104(b)(5), and
104(b)(6)’’ each place it appears and inserting
‘‘104(b)(3), and 104(b)(5)’’;
(2) in subsection (b)(1)(A)(iii) by striking
‘‘104(b)(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘104(b)(3)’’;
(3) 
in 
subsection 
(b)(3)(B) 
by 
striking
‘‘104(b)(5)(B), 
or 
104(b)(6)’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘104(b)(3), or 104(b)(5)(B)’’; and
(4) in each of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) by
striking ‘‘118(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘118’’.
SEC. 237. REVOCATION OF DRIVERS’ LICENSES OF INDIVID-
UALS CONVICTED OF DRUG OFFENSES.
Section 159 of title 23, United States Code, is amended
in each of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4) by striking ‘‘118(b)’’
and inserting ‘‘118’’.
SEC. 238. REIMBURSEMENT FOR SEGMENTS OF INTER-
STATE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT FED-
ERAL ASSISTANCE.
Section 160 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘The amount’’
and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection (g), the amount’’;
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
107
‘‘(g) PUERTO RICO.—Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision of this section, Puerto Rico shall receive in a fiscal
year 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the amounts appropriated pursuant
to subsection (f) for such fiscal year. No State (including
the District of Columbia) which has a reimbursement per-
centage in the table contained in subsection (c) of 0.50 shall
have its reimbursement amount in fiscal years 1996 and
1997 reduced as a result of the enactment of the preceding
sentence.’’.
SEC. 239. FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY PROGRAM.
(a) PUBLIC LANDS HIGHWAYS ALLOCATION.—Section
202(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘66 percent of the remainder’’ and inserting ‘‘the re-
maining 66 percent’’.
(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Section 203 of such
title is amended by striking the comma preceding ‘‘forest
development’’ each place it appears.
(c) PURPOSES FOR WHICH FUNDS MAY BE USED.—
Section 204(b) of such title is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘construction and improvement’’
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘planning, re-
search, engineering, and construction’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘construction or improvement’’
and inserting ‘‘planning, research, engineering, or
construction’’.
108
(d) APPROVAL
OF
INDIAN
RESERVATION
ROAD
PROJECTS.—Section 204(c) of such title is amended by in-
serting ‘‘of’’ after ‘‘15 percent’’.
(e) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Section 204 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(k) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, funds available for Federal lands
highway programs shall be treated as obligated if—
‘‘(1) the Secretary authorizes engineering and re-
lated work for a particular project; or
‘‘(2) the Secretary approves plans, specifications,
and estimates for procurement of construction under
section 106 or 117 of this title.’’.
(f) 
REFERENCE
TO
PARK
ROADS.—Section
1003(a)(6)(C) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 1919) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘HIGHWAYS’’ in the subpara-
graph heading and inserting ‘‘ROADS’’; and
(2) by striking ‘‘highways’’ the place it appears
preceding ‘‘$69,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘roads’’.
(g) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1032(b)(2) (A)
of such Act (105 Stat. 1974) is amended by striking ‘‘im-
provements’’ and inserting ‘‘improvement’’.
109
SEC. 240. BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAY.
Section 217 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘pedestrian
walkways and’’ before ‘‘bicycle transportation facili-
ties’’;
(2) in subsection (f) by striking ‘‘and the Federal
share’’ and all that follows through ‘‘80 percent’’;
(3) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection
(k); and
(4) by inserting after subsection (i) the following
new subsection:
‘‘(j) INCLUSION OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND BICY-
CLE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN PLANNING.—
‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—The Secretary may not
approve under this chapter a highway project for new
construction or reconstruction within the boundaries
of a State along which a pedestrian walkway or bicy-
cle transportation facility is required to be included
under the State’s transportation improvement plan
developed under section 135 unless such pedestrian
walkway or bicycle transportation facility is part of
such highway project.
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary does not have
to approve a project for construction of a pedestrian
110
walkway or bicycle transportation facility under
paragraph (1)—
‘‘(A) if the Secretary determines that such
construction is not feasible or that use of the
walkway or facility would pose a safety risk to
pedestrians or bicyclists, as the case may be; or
‘‘(B) the Secretary determines that there
will be no substantial transportation or recre-
ation benefit resulting from the project.’’.
SEC. 241. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.
Section 302(b) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘on the Federal-aid secondary system,
financed with secondary funds,’’ and inserting ‘‘not on the
National Highway System’’.
SEC. 242. MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.
Section 303 of title 23, United States Code, is amended
in each of subsections (a) and (b) by striking ‘‘1 year after
the date of the enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘De-
cember 18, 1992’’.
SEC. 243. STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH.
Section 307 of title 23, United States Code, is amend-
ed—
(1) in subsection (c)(1) by striking ‘‘104’’ and
inserting ‘‘104(b)’’;
111
(2) in subsection (e)(3)(C) by striking ‘‘climac-
tic’’ and inserting ‘‘climatic’’;
(3) in subsection (e)(13) by striking the
quotation marks preceding ‘‘$35,000,000’’;
(4) in subsection (f)(2) by striking ‘‘section’’ the
first place it appears and inserting ‘‘paragraph’’;
(5) in the heading to subsection (f)(3) by insert-
ing ‘‘EARTHQUAKE’’ after ‘‘NATIONAL’’; and
(6) in subsection (f)(3) by inserting ‘‘Earth-
quake’’ after ‘‘National’’.
SEC. 244. APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES OF
FEDERAL LANDS.
Section 317(d) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘system’’ and inserting ‘‘highway’’.
SEC. 245. INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION
OUTREACH PROGRAM.
Section 325(a)(5) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this sec-
tion’’ and inserting ‘‘December 18, 1991’’.
SEC. 246. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402 of title 23, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
‘‘§ 402. Highway safety programs
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall have a highway
safety program approved by the Secretary which is designed
112
to reduce traffic accidents and deaths, injuries, and prop-
erty damage resulting therefrom.
‘‘(b) UNIFORM GUIDELINES.—
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The State highway safety
programs approved under this section shall be in ac-
cordance with uniform guidelines promulgated by the
Secretary.
‘‘(2) PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA.—The uniform
guidelines shall be expressed in terms of performance
criteria.
‘‘(3) PURPOSES.—The uniform guidelines shall
include, at a minimum, criteria relating to—
‘‘(A) reducing injuries and deaths resulting
from motor vehicles being driven in excess of
posted speed limits;
‘‘(B) encouraging the proper use of occu-
pant protection devices (including the use of
safety belts and child restraint systems) by occu-
pants of motor vehicles and increasing public
awareness of the benefit of motor vehicles
equipped with airbags;
‘‘(C) reducing deaths and injuries resulting
from persons driving motor vehicles while im-
paired by alcohol or a controlled substance;
113
‘‘(D) reducing deaths and injuries resulting
from accidents involving motorcycles;
‘‘(E) reducing injuries and deaths resulting
from accidents involving school buses; and
‘‘(F) improving law enforcement services in
motor vehicle accident prevention, traffic super-
vision, and post-accident procedures.
‘‘(4) EFFECTIVENESS DETERMINATION.—A State
highway safety program relating to a guideline estab-
lished pursuant to paragraph (3) shall be considered
a most effective program for purposes of subsection (i)
unless the Secretary determines, after a rulemaking
process under subsection (i), that it should not be so
considered and submits a report to Congress describ-
ing the reasons for the determination.
‘‘(5) 
ADDITIONAL
PURPOSES.—The 
uniform
guidelines may include provisions to improve driver
performance (including driver education, driver test-
ing to determine proficiency to operate motor vehicles,
driver examinations (both physical and mental) and
driver licensing) and to improve pedestrian perform-
ance and bicycle safety. In addition the uniform
guidelines may include provisions for an effective
record system of accidents (including injuries and
deaths resulting therefrom), accident investigations to
114
determine the probable causes of accidents, injuries,
and deaths, vehicle registration, operation, and in-
spection, highway design and maintenance (including
lighting, markings, and surface treatment), traffic
control, vehicle codes and laws, surveillance of traffic
for detection and correction of high or potentially
high accident locations, and emergency services.
‘‘(6) APPLICABILITY
TO
FEDERALLY
ADMINIS-
TERED
AREAS.—The uniform guidelines which are
applicable to State highway safety programs shall, to
the extent determined appropriate by the Secretary,
be applicable to federally administered areas where a
Federal department or agency controls the highways
or supervises traffic operations.
‘‘(7) LIMITATION
ON
STATUTORY
CONSTRUC-
TION.—Implementation of a highway safety program
under this section shall not be construed to require the
Secretary to require compliance with every uniform
guideline, or with every element of every uniform
guideline, in every State.
‘‘(8) COOPERATION
IN
PROMULGATION.—Uni-
form guidelines promulgated by the Secretary to
carry out this section shall be developed in coopera-
tion with the States, their political subdivisions, ap-
propriate Federal departments and agencies, and such
115
other public and private organizations as the Sec-
retary deems appropriate.
‘‘(9) ASSISTANCE OF OTHER FEDERAL DEPART-
MENTS.—The Secretary may make arrangements with
other Federal departments and agencies for assistance
in the preparation of uniform guidelines for the high-
way safety programs contemplated by this subsection
and in the administration of such programs. Such de-
partments and agencies are directed to cooperate in
such preparation and administration, on a reimburs-
able basis.
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not ap-
prove a State highway safety program under this sec-
tion which does not—
‘‘(A) provide that the Governor of the State
shall be responsible for the administration of the
program through a State highway safety agency
which shall have adequate powers and be suit-
ably equipped and organized to carry out, to the
satisfaction of the Secretary, such program;
‘‘(B) authorize political subdivisions of the
State to carry out local highway safety programs
within their jurisdictions as a part of the State
highway safety program if such local highway
116
safety programs are approved by the Governor
and are in accordance with the uniform guide-
lines promulgated by the Secretary under this
section;
‘‘(C) except as provided in paragraph (2),
provide that at least 40 percent of all Federal
funds apportioned under this section to the State
for any fiscal year will be expended by the polit-
ical subdivisions of the State, including Indian
tribal governments, in carrying out local high-
way safety programs authorized in accordance
with subparagraph (B); and
‘‘(D) provide adequate and reasonable ac-
cess for the safe and convenient movement of in-
dividuals with disabilities, including those in
wheelchairs, across curbs constructed or replaced
on or after July 1, 1976, at all pedestrian cross-
walks throughout the State.
‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the re-
quirement of paragraph (1)(C), in whole or in part,
for a fiscal year for any State whenever the Secretary
determines that there is an insufficient number of
local highway safety programs to justify the expendi-
ture in the State of such percentage of Federal funds
during the fiscal year.
117
‘‘(3) USE
OF
TECHNOLOGY
FOR
TRAFFIC
EN-
FORCEMENT.—The Secretary may encourage States to
use technologically advanced traffic enforcement de-
vices (including the use of automatic speed detection
devices such as photo-radar) by law enforcement offi-
cers.
‘‘(d) DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING PROGRAM.—
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish a highway safety program for the collection
and reporting of data on traffic-related deaths and
injuries by the States. Under such program, the
States shall collect and report to the Secretary such
data as the Secretary may require.
‘‘(2) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the program
under this subsection are to ensure national uniform
data on such deaths and injuries and to allow the
Secretary to make determinations for use in develop-
ing programs to reduce such deaths and injuries and
making recommendations to Congress concerning leg-
islation necessary to implement such programs.
‘‘(3) PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS.—The program
under this subsection shall include information ob-
tained by the Secretary under section 4004 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 and provide for annual reports to the Secretary
118
on the efforts being made by the States in reducing
deaths and injuries occurring at highway construc-
tion sites and the effectiveness and results of such ef-
forts.
‘‘(4) REPORTING CRITERIA.—The Secretary shall
establish minimum reporting criteria for the program
under this subsection. Such criteria shall include, but
not be limited to, criteria on deaths and injuries re-
sulting from police pursuits, school bus accidents, and
speeding, on traffic-related deaths and injuries at
highway construction sites and on the configuration
of commercial motor vehicles involved in motor vehi-
cle accidents.
‘‘(e) USE OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(1) FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS.—Funds
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this sec-
tion shall be used to aid the States to conduct the
highway safety programs approved in accordance
with subsection (a), including development and im-
plementation of manpower training programs, and of
demonstration programs that the Secretary deter-
mines will contribute directly to the reduction of traf-
fic accidents and deaths and injuries resulting there-
from.
119
‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES.—Funds au-
thorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
shall be subject to a deduction not to exceed 5 percent
for the necessary costs of administering the provisions
of this section, and the remainder shall be appor-
tioned among the several States under subsection (f).
‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this section au-
thorizes the appropriation or expenditure of funds—
‘‘(A) for highway construction, mainte-
nance, or design (other than design of safety fea-
tures of highways to be incorporated into guide-
lines); or
‘‘(B) for any purpose for which funds are
authorized by section 403 of this title.
‘‘(f) APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(1) FORMULA.—After the deduction under sub-
section (e)(2), the remainder of the funds authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section shall be
apportioned 75 percent in the ratio which the popu-
lation of each State bears to the total population of
all the States, as shown by the latest available Federal
census, and 25 percent in the ratio which the public
road mileage in each State bears to the total public
road mileage in all States.
120
‘‘(2) MINIMUM PERCENTAGE.—The annual ap-
portionment to each State shall not be less than 1⁄2 of
1 percent of the total apportionment; except that the
apportionments to the Virgin Islands, Guam, Amer-
ican Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands shall not be less than 1⁄4 of 1 percent
of the total apportionment.
‘‘(3) APPROVED HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM.—
The Secretary shall not apportion any funds under
this subsection to any State which is not implement-
ing a highway safety program approved by the Sec-
retary in accordance with this section.
‘‘(4) REDUCTION
OF
APPORTIONMENT.—Funds
apportioned under this section to any State, that does
not have a highway safety program approved by the
Secretary or that is not implementing an approved
program, shall be reduced by amounts equal to not
less than 50 percent of the amounts that would other-
wise be apportioned to the State under this section,
until such time as the Secretary approves such pro-
gram or determines that the State is implementing an
approved program, as appropriate. The Secretary
shall consider the gravity of the State’s failure to have
or implement an approved program in determining
the amount of the reduction.
121
‘‘(5) APPORTIONMENT OF WITHHELD FUNDS.—
The Secretary shall promptly apportion to the State
the funds withheld from its apportionment if the Sec-
retary approves the State’s highway safety program
or determines that the State has begun implementing
an approved program, as appropriate, prior to the
end of the fiscal year for which the funds were with-
held. If the Secretary determines that the State did
not correct its failure within such period, the Sec-
retary shall reapportion the withheld funds to the
other States in accordance with the formula specified
in this subsection not later than 30 days after such
determination.
‘‘(6) DETERMINATION
OF
PUBLIC
ROAD
MILE-
AGE.—For the purposes of this subsection, the term a
‘public road’ means any road under the jurisdiction
of, and maintained by, a public authority and open
to public travel. As used in this subsection, public
road mileage shall be determined as of the end of the
calendar year preceding the year in which the funds
are apportioned and shall be certified to by the Gov-
ernor of the State and subject to approval by the Sec-
retary.
‘‘(g) APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1.—
122
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided
in this subsection, all provisions of chapter 1 of this
title that are applicable to National Highway System
highway funds, other than provisions relating to the
apportionment formula and provisions limiting the
expenditure of such funds to the Federal-aid systems,
shall apply to the highway safety funds authorized to
be appropriated to carry out this section.
‘‘(2) INCONSISTENT
PROVISIONS.—If the Sec-
retary determines that a provision of chapter 1 of this
title is inconsistent with this section, such provision
shall not apply to funds authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this section.
‘‘(3) CREDIT FOR STATE AND LOCAL EXPENDI-
TURES.—The aggregate of all expenditures made dur-
ing any fiscal year by a State and its political sub-
divisions (exclusive of Federal funds) for carrying out
the State highway safety program (other than plan-
ning and administration) shall be available for the
purpose of crediting such State during such fiscal
year for the non-Federal share of the cost of any
project under this section (other than one for plan-
ning or administration) without regard to whether
such expenditures were actually made in connection
with such project.
123
‘‘(4) INCREASED FEDERAL SHARE FOR CERTAIN
INDIAN
TRIBE
PROGRAMS.—In the case of a local
highway safety program carried out by an Indian
tribe, if the Secretary is satisfied that an Indian tribe
does not have sufficient funds available to meet the
non-Federal share of the cost of such program, the
Secretary may increase the Federal share of the cost
thereof payable under this title to the extent nec-
essary.
‘‘(5) TREATMENT OF TERM ‘STATE HIGHWAY DE-
PARTMENT’.—In applying the provisions of chapter 1
of this title in carrying out this section, the term
‘State highway department’ as used in such provi-
sions shall mean the Governor of a State for the pur-
poses of this section.
‘‘(h) APPLICATION IN INDIAN COUNTRY.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of the appli-
cation of this section in Indian country, the terms
‘State’ and ‘Governor of a State’ include the Sec-
retary of the Interior and the term ‘political subdivi-
sion of a State’ includes an Indian tribe. Notwith-
standing the provisions of subsection (c)(1)(C), 95
percent of the funds transferred to the Secretary of the
Interior under this section shall be expended by In-
dian tribes to carry out highway safety programs
124
within their jurisdictions. The provisions of sub-
section (c)(1)(D) shall be applicable to Indian tribes,
except to those tribes with respect to which the Sec-
retary determines that application of such provisions
would not be practicable.
‘‘(2) INDIAN COUNTRY DEFINED.—For the pur-
pose of this subsection, the term ‘Indian country’
means—
‘‘(A) all land within the limits of any In-
dian reservation under the jurisdiction of the
United States, notwithstanding the issuance of
any patent, and including rights-of-way running
through the reservation;
‘‘(B) all dependent Indian communities
within the borders of the United States whether
within the original or subsequently acquired ter-
ritory thereof and whether within or without the
limits of a State; and
‘‘(C) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles
to which have not been extinguished, including
rights-of-way running through such allotments.
‘‘(i) RULEMAKING PROCESS.—The Secretary may
from time to time conduct a rulemaking process to deter-
mine those highway safety programs that are most effective
in reducing traffic accidents, injuries, and deaths. Any rule
125
under this subsection shall be promulgated taking into ac-
count consideration of the views of the States having a
major role in establishing such programs. When a rule pro-
mulgated in accordance with this subsection takes effect,
only those programs established by such rule as most effec-
tive in reducing traffic accidents, injuries, and deaths shall
be eligible to receive Federal financial assistance under this
section.’’.
(b) SECTION 2005.—Section 2005(1) of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
2079) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ the first place it appears
and inserting a comma; and
(2) by striking ‘‘, 1994,’’ and inserting ‘‘and
1994, and $146,000,000 for each of fiscal years’’.
SEC. 247. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SAFETY ADVISORY COMMIT-
TEE.
Section 404(d) of title 23, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘Commerce’’ and inserting ‘‘Transpor-
tation’’.
SEC. 
248. 
ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED 
DRIVING 
COUNTER-
MEASURES.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 410(d)(1)(E)
of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the
126
date of enactment of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘December
18, 1991’’.
(b) BASIC GRANT ELIGIBILITY.—Section 410(d)(3) of
such title is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(3)’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) A State shall be treated as having met the
requirement of this paragraph if—
‘‘(i) the State provides to the Secretary a
written certification that the highest court of the
State has issued a decision indicating that im-
plementation of subparagraph (A) would con-
stitute a violation of the constitution of the
State; and
‘‘(ii) the State demonstrates to the satisfac-
tion of the Secretary—
‘‘(I) that the alcohol fatal crash in-
volvement rate in the State has decreased in
each of the 3 most recent calendar years for
which statistics for determining such rate
are available; and
‘‘(II) that the alcohol fatal crash in-
volvement rate in the State has been lower
than the average such rate for all States in
each of such calendar years.’’.
127
SEC. 249. PUBLIC TRANSIT FACILITIES.
Section 1023(h) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by striking ‘‘this
Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘the Department
of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act, 1993’’.
SEC. 250. PENSACOLA, FLORIDA.
Section 1086(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2022) is amended
by striking ‘‘Not later than 2 years after the date of the
enactment of this Act,’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before June
18, 1995,’’.
SEC. 251. HIGH COST BRIDGE PROJECT.
The table contained in section 1103(b) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2027–2028) is amended in item number 5, relating
to Gloucester Point, Virginia, by inserting after ‘‘York
River’’ the following: ‘‘and for repair, strengthening, and
rehabilitation of the existing bridge’’.
SEC. 252. CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT.
The table contained in section 1104(b) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2029–2031) is amended—
(1) in item number 10, relating to San Diego,
California, by striking ‘‘1 block of Cut and Cover
128
Tunnel on Rt. 15’’ and inserting ‘‘bridge decking on
Route 15’’; and
(2) in item number 43, relating to West Vir-
ginia, by striking ‘‘Coal Fields’’ and inserting ‘‘Coal-
fields’’.
SEC. 253. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGH-
WAY SYSTEM.
(a) EAST-WEST TRANSAMERICA CORRIDOR.—Section
1105(c)(3) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by inserting
before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, including (A)
a Kentucky corridor centered on the cities of Paducah, Ben-
ton, Hopkinsville, Bowling Green, Columbia, Somerset,
London, Hazard, Jenkins, and Pikeville, Kentucky, to
Williamson, West Virginia, and (B) a West Virginia cor-
ridor from Williamson to the vicinity of Welch, West Vir-
ginia, sharing a common corridor with the I–73/74 corridor
(referred to in item 12 of the table contained in subsection
(f)), and from the vicinity of Welch to Beckley, West Vir-
ginia, as part of the Coalfields Expressway described in sec-
tion 1069(v)’’.
(b) INDIANAPOLIS TO HOUSTON CORRIDOR.—Section
1105(c)(18) of such Act (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by
inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, in-
cluding a Kentucky corridor centered on the cities of Hen-
129
derson, Sturgis, Smithland, Paducah, Bardwell, and Hick-
man, Kentucky’’.
SEC. 254. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR PROJECT.
The table contained in section 1105(f) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2033–2035) is amended—
(1) in item 1, relating to Pennsylvania, by in-
serting after ‘‘For’’ the following: ‘‘the segment de-
scribed in item 6 of this table and, after completion
of such segment, for’’; and
(2) in item number 26, relating to Indiana,
Kentucky, Tennessee, by striking ‘‘Newberry’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Evansville’’.
SEC. 255. RURAL ACCESS PROJECTS.
(a) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS.—The table contained in
section 1106(a)(2) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2037–2042) is
amended—
(1) in item number 34, relating to Illinois, by
striking ‘‘Resurfacing’’ and all that follows through
‘‘Omaha’’ and inserting ‘‘Bel-Air Road improvement
from south of Carmi to State Route 141 in southeast-
ern White County’’;
130
(2) in item number 52, relating to Bedford
Springs, Pennsylvania, by striking ‘‘and Hunting-
ton’’ and inserting ‘‘Franklin, and Huntingdon’’;
(3) in item number 61, relating to Lubbock,
Texas, by striking ‘‘with’’ and inserting ‘‘with Inter-
state 10 through’’;
(4) in item number 75, relating to Pennsylvania,
by striking ‘‘Widen’’ and all that follows through
‘‘lanes’’ and inserting ‘‘Road improvements on a 14-
mile segment of U.S. Route 15 in Lycoming County,
Pennsylvania’’;
(5) in item number 92, relating to Ohio, by
striking ‘‘Minerva, Ohio’’ and insert ‘‘Lisbon, Ohio’’;
(6) in item number 93, relating to New Mexico,
by striking ‘‘Raton-Clayton Rd., Clayton, New Mex-
ico’’ and inserting ‘‘U.S. Rt. 64/87 from Raton, New
Mexico, through Clayton to the Texas-New Mexico
State line’’; and
(7) in item number 111, relating to Parker
County, Texas (SH199)—
(A) by striking ‘‘Parker County’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Parker and Tarrant Counties’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘to four-’’ and inserting ‘‘in
Tarrant County, to freeway standards and in
Parker County to a 4-’’.
131
(b) ADDITIONAL FUNDING.—Section 1106(a) of such
Act is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(8) ADDITIONAL
FUNDING.—In addition to
funds otherwise made available by this subsection for
the project described in item number 52 of the table
contained in paragraph (2), there shall be available
from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass
Transit Account) for carrying out such project
$5,000,000 for fiscal year 1995 and $1,300,000 per
fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1996 and 1997.’’.
SEC. 256. URBAN ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECTS.
The table contained in section 1106(b)(2) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2043–2047) is amended—
(1) in item number 13, relating to Joliet, Illi-
nois, by striking ‘‘and construction and interchange
at Houbolt Road and I–80’’; and
(2) in item number 36, relating to Compton,
California, by striking ‘‘For a grade’’ and all that fol-
lows through ‘‘Corridor’’ and inserting ‘‘For grade
separations and other improvements in the city of
Compton, California’’.
132
SEC. 257. INNOVATIVE PROJECTS.
The table contained in section 1107(b) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2048–2059) is amended—
(1) in item 20, relating to Holidaysburg, Penn-
sylvania—
(A) by striking ‘‘Holidaysburg,’’ the first
place it appears; and
(B) by inserting ‘‘, or other projects in the
counties of Bedford, Blair, Centre, Franklin, and
Huntingdon as selected by the State of Penn-
sylvania’’ after ‘‘Pennsylvania’’ the second place
it appears;
(2) in item number 29, relating to Blacksburg,
Virginia, by inserting ‘‘methods of facilitating public
and private participation in’’ after ‘‘demonstrate’’;
(3) in item number 35, relating to Alabama, by
striking ‘‘to bypass’’ and all that follows through ‘‘I–
85’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning on U.S. Route 80 west
of Montgomery, Alabama, and connecting to I–65
south of Montgomery and I–85 east of Montgomery’’;
(4) in item number 52, relating to Pennsylvania,
by striking ‘‘off Interstate’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘Pennsylvania’’ and inserting ‘‘and other
highway projects within a 30-mile vicinity of Inter-
133
state Route 81 or Interstate Route 80 in northeastern
Pennsylvania’’;
(5) in item number 61, relating to Mojave, Cali-
fornia, 
by 
striking 
‘‘Mojave’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘Victorville’’ and by inserting ‘‘Mojave’’ after ‘‘recon-
struct’’;
(6) in item number 76, relating to Tennessee—
(A) by inserting after ‘‘I–81’’ the following:
‘‘interchange at’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘Interchange’’ and inserting
‘‘or Kendrick Creek Road’’;
(7) in item number 100, relating to Arkansas, by
striking ‘‘Thornton’’ and inserting ‘‘Little Rock’’;
(8) in item number 113, relating to Durham
County, North Carolina, by inserting after ‘‘Route
147’’ the following: ‘‘, including the interchange at I–
85’’; and
(9) in item number 114, relating to Corpus
Christi to Angleton, Texas, by striking ‘‘Construct
new multi-lane freeway’’ and inserting ‘‘Construct a
4-lane divided highway’’.
SEC. 258. INTERMODAL PROJECTS.
The table contained in section 1108(b) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105
Stat. 2060–2063) is amended—
134
(1) in item number 9, relating to E. Haven/Wal-
lingford, Connecticut—
(A) by striking ‘‘$8.8’’ and inserting
‘‘$7.5’’;
(B) by striking ‘‘$2.4’’ and inserting
‘‘$2.0’’; and
(C) by striking ‘‘$0.7’’ and inserting
‘‘$0.6’’;
(2) in item 38, relating to Provo, Utah, strike
‘‘South’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Airport’’ and
insert ‘‘East-West Connector from United States
Highway 89–189, Provo, Utah’’; and
(3) in item 51, relating to Long Beach, Califor-
nia, by inserting ‘‘(including a grade separation
project for the Los Alamitos traffic circle at Lakewood
Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway)’’ after ‘‘Ac-
cess’’.
SEC. 259. MISCELLANEOUS INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANS-
PORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT AMENDMENTS.
(a) CROSS REFERENCE IN HIGHWAY USE TAX EVA-
SION PROGRAM.—Section 1040(a) of the Intermodal Sur-
face Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 101
note; 105 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking ‘‘(e)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘(f)’’.
135
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS ON QUALITY IMPROVE-
MENT.—Section 1043(b) of such Act (105 Stat. 1993) is
amended by inserting ‘‘General’’ after ‘‘Comptroller’’.
(c) COALFIELDS EXPRESSWAY.—Section 1069(v) of
such Act (105 Stat. 2010) is amended by striking ‘‘97, 10,
16, and 93’’ and inserting ‘‘16, and 83’’.
(d) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MIS-
CELLANEOUS PROJECTS.—Section 1069 of such Act is
amended—
(1) by striking the last sentence of subsection (y);
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(ii) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds provided to
carry out this section shall remain available until ex-
pended.’’.
(e) FINAL RULE FOR ROADSIDE BARRIERS AND SAFE-
TY APPURTENANCES.—Section 1073(b) of such Act (105
Stat. 2012) is amended by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting
‘‘2 years’’.
(f) INTERSTATE STUDY COMMISSION.—Section 1099 of
such Act (105 Stat. 2026) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘bill’’ and inserting ‘‘Act’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘passage of this legislation’’ and
inserting ‘‘the enactment of this Act’’;
136
(3) by inserting after ‘‘Columbia’’ the second
place it appears the following: ‘‘appointed by the Gov-
ernors of the States of Maryland and Virginia and
the Mayor of the District of Columbia, respectively’’;
and
(4) by striking ‘‘appointed by the Governors and
the Mayor’’ and inserting ‘‘, 1 each for Maryland,
Virginia, and the District of Columbia appointed by
the Governors and the Mayor, respectively’’.
(g) DRUG RECOGNITION EXPERT TRAINING PRO-
GRAM.—Section 2006(b) of such Act (23 U.S.C. 403 note;
105 Stat. 2080) is amended by inserting ‘‘Federal’’ before
‘‘Advisory’’.
(h) APPLICABILITY OF OBLIGATION CEILING TO CER-
TAIN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS.—Section 2009 of such
Act (105 Stat. 2080) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘211(b)’’ the first place it ap-
pears and inserting ‘‘211’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘102’’ and inserting ‘‘1002’’; and
(4) by striking subsection (b).
SEC. 260. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PRO-
GRAM.
In administering section 1003(b) of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, the limita-
137
tion on annual gross receipts of a small business concern
set forth in paragraph (2)(A) of such section shall be the
only limitation on annual gross receipts which applies to
small business concerns.
SEC. 261. AMENDMENTS TO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
AND UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE ACT
OF 1987.
(a) SECTION 149.—Section 149(a)(69) of the Surface
Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of
1987 (101 Stat. 191), relating to Burbank-Glendale-Pasa-
dena Airport, California, is amended—
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘highway’’;
(2) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘and con-
struction of terminal and parking facilities at such
airport’’; and
(3) by striking ‘‘by making’’ in the second sen-
tence and all that follows through the period at the
end of such sentence and inserting: ‘‘by preparing a
feasibility study and conducting preliminary engi-
neering, design, and construction of a link between
such airport and the commuter rail system that is
being developed by the Los Angeles County Metropoli-
tan Transportation Authority.’’.
(b) SECTION 317.—Section 317(b) of such Act (49
U.S.C. App. 1608 note; 101 Stat. 233) is amended—
138
(1) in paragraphs (2) and (3) by inserting ‘‘or
cooperative agreement’’ after ‘‘contract’’ each place it
appears; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(7) CONVERSION
OF
CONTRACTS.—The Sec-
retary may convert existing contracts entered into
under this subsection into cooperative agreements.’’.
SEC. 262. FREEWAY SERVICE PATROLS.
(a) GENERAL RULE.—Except to the extent that the
Secretary shall find that it is not feasible, any funds ex-
pended in a fiscal year directly or indirectly for freeway
service patrols from amounts made available to a State
under titles I and III of the Intermodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act of 1991 shall be expended with pri-
vately owned or privately operated business concerns. The
preceding sentence shall not apply to any publicly owned
or operated freeway service patrol that was in operation
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the
term ‘‘freeway service patrol’’ means automotive road serv-
ice vehicles and automotive towing vehicles operated in a
continuous, dedicated service as part of an incident man-
agement program.
139
SEC. 263. PAN AMERICAN HIGHWAY.
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study on
the adequacy of and the need for improvements to the Pan
American Highway.
(b) ELEMENTS.—The study to be conducted under sub-
section (a) shall at a minimum include the following ele-
ments:
(1) Findings on the benefits of constructing a
highway at Darien Gap, Panama and Colombia.
(2) Recommendations for a self-financing ar-
rangement for completion and maintenance of the
Pan American Highway.
(3) Recommendations for establishing a Pan
American highway authority to monitor financing,
construction, maintenance, and operations of the Pan
American Highway.
(4) Findings on the benefits to trade and pros-
perity of a more efficient Pan American Highway.
(5) Findings on the benefits to United States in-
dustry through the use of United States technology
and equipment in construction of improvements to the
Pan American Highway.
(6) Findings on environmental considerations,
including environmental considerations relating to
the Darien Gap.
140
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to
Congress a report on the results of the study conducted
under this section.
SEC. 264. SECTION 3 PROGRAM AMENDMENTS.
(a) LETTERS OF INTENT.—Section 3(a)(4)(E) of the
Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1602(a)(4)(E)) is
amended—
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘letters of in-
tent’’ and all that follows through ‘‘shall not exceed
the’’ and inserting ‘‘letters of intent, early systems
work agreements, and full funding grant agreements
shall not exceed the’’; and
(2) in the second sentence by striking ‘‘new let-
ters issued’’ and all that follows through ‘‘shall not ex-
ceed any’’ and inserting ‘‘new letters issued and con-
tingent commitments included in early systems work
agreements and full funding agreements shall not ex-
ceed any’’.
(b) 
ASSURED
TIMETABLE
FOR
FINAL
DESIGN
STAGE.—Section 3(a)(6)(C) of the Federal Transit Act (49
U.S.C. App. 1602(a)(6)(C)) is amended by inserting before
the period at the end the following: ‘‘or, if an environmental
impact statement is not required for such project, the date
141
of completion of an environmental assessment for such
project or of a finding of no significant impact’’.
(c) 
OREGON
LIGHT
RAIL
PROGRAM.—Section
3(a)(8)(C)(v) of such Act is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘Westside’’ the first place it ap-
pears;
(2) by striking ‘‘and’’ following ‘‘101–584;’’; and
(3) by inserting before the period at the end the
following ‘‘; and the locally preferred alternative for
the South/North Corridor Project between Clackamas
County, Oregon, Portland, Oregon, and Clark County,
Washington’’.
(d) RAIL MODERNIZATION.—Section 3(h) of such Act
is amended in paragraph (6) by striking ‘‘paragraph’’ and
inserting ‘‘subsection’’.
(e) NONAPPLICABILITY.—Section 3(i)(5)(C) of such
Act is amended by striking ‘‘the Federal-Aid Highway Act
of 1991’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘title 23, United
States Code,’’.
(f) TRANSITIONAL PROVISION
FOR PROGRAMS
OF
INTERRELATED PROJECTS.—Section 3011(b) of the Inter-
modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (49
U.S.C. App. 1602 note; 105 Stat. 2098) is amended by in-
serting after ‘‘interrelated projects’’ the following: ‘‘but ex-
cluding any project for which a timetable for project review
142
or for Federal funding is provided for by a provision of
law other than section 3(a)(6) of the Federal Transit Act
and for which such timetable is different than the timetable
established by such section’’.
(g) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 3007 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(105 Stat. 2091) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (5)(B) by striking the comma
which precedes the closing quotation marks and the
semicolon; and
(2) in paragraph (6) by striking the comma
which precedes the closing quotation marks and the
final period.
SEC. 265. METROPOLITAN PLANNING.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 8 of the Fed-
eral Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1607) is amended—
(1) in subsection (f)(5) by inserting ‘‘of title 23,
United States Code’’ after ‘‘133’’;
(2) in subsection (f)(9) by striking ‘‘of this title’’
and inserting ‘‘of such title’’;
(3) in subsection (f)(11) by inserting ‘‘passengers
and’’ before ‘‘freight’’;
(4) in subsection (g)(5) by redesignating sub-
paragraphs (i) and (ii) as subparagraphs (A) and
(B), respectively;
143
(5) in subsection (i)(3) by striking ‘‘this title
and the Federal Transit Act’’ and inserting ‘‘title 23,
United States Code, and this Act’’;
(6) in subsection (i)(4) by striking ‘‘or pursuant
to the Federal Transit’’ and inserting ‘‘, or pursuant
to this’’;
(7) in subsection (i)(5) by inserting ‘‘of title 23,
United States Code,’’ after ‘‘section 134’’;
(8) in subsection (i)(5) by inserting ‘‘of such
title’’ after ‘‘104(b)(3)’’;
(9) in subsection (i)(5) by inserting ‘‘of such
title’’ after ‘‘133(d)(3)’’ each place it appears;
(10) in subsection (i)(5) by striking ‘‘the Federal
Transit’’ the first 2 places it appears and inserting
‘‘this’’;
(11) in subsection (i)(5) by striking ‘‘section 8(o)
of the Federal Transit Act’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection
(o) of this section’’;
(12) in subsection (m)(1) by striking ‘‘or the
Federal Transit’’ and inserting ‘‘, or this’’;
(13) in each of subsections (p)(2) and (p)(4) by
striking ‘‘section 8’’ the first place it appears and in-
serting ‘‘this section’’;
(14) in subsection (p)(2) by striking ‘‘section 8
of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘this section’’;
144
(15) in subsection (p)(3) by striking ‘‘subpara-
graph (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; and
(16) in subsection (p)(5) by striking ‘‘para-
graph’’ and inserting ‘‘section’’.
(b) FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED.—Section 8(f) of
such Act is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(16) Recreational travel and tourism.’’.
(c) LONG RANGE PLAN.—Section 8(g)(2)(B) of such
Act is amended by striking ‘‘long-range’’ and inserting
‘‘long range’’.
(d) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Section 8(k) of such Act
is amended by striking the last sentence.
(e) NONATTAINMENT AREA REQUIREMENTS.—Section
8(l) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘transit’’ and in-
serting ‘‘highway’’.
SEC. 266. FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM.
(a) TRANSIT SECURITY SYSTEMS.—Section 9(e)(3) of
the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1607a(e)(3)) is
amended by inserting before ‘‘and any other’’ in the last
sentence the following: ‘‘employing law enforcement or secu-
rity personnel in areas within or adjacent to such sys-
tems;’’.
(b) GRANDFATHER OF CERTAIN URBANIZED AREAS.—
Section 9(s)(2) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal
145
year 1993,’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 1993 and
1994,’’.
(c) FERRYBOAT OPERATIONS.—For purposes of cal-
culating apportionments under section 9 of the Federal
Transit Act for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
1994, 50 percent of the ferryboat revenue vehicle miles and
50 percent of the ferryboat route miles attributable to serv-
ice provided to the city of Avalon, California, for which the
operator receives public assistance shall be included in the
calculation of ‘‘fixed guideway vehicle revenue miles’’ and
‘‘fixed guideway route miles’’ attributable to the Los Angeles
urbanized area under sections 9(b)(2) and 15 of such Act.
SEC. 267. MASS TRANSIT ACCOUNT BLOCK GRANTS.
Section 9B(a) of the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C.
App. 1607a–2(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘subsections (b)
and (c) of’’.
SEC. 268. GRANTS FOR RESEARCH AND TRAINING.
(a) NATIONAL CENTER.—Section 11(b)(10)(A) of the
Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. 1607c(b)(10)(A)) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘technology’’ and inserting ‘‘Technology’’.
(b) APPLICABILITY OF OBLIGATION CEILING TO FUND-
ING FOR UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTERS.—Section
11(b)(12) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘102’’ and
inserting ‘‘1002’’.
146
(c) INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SURFACE TRANS-
PORTATION POLICY STUDIES.—Section 11(c) of such Act is
amended—
(1) in the heading to paragraph (1) by striking
‘‘INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL’’ and inserting ‘‘INTER-
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR’’;
(2) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘an institute
for national’’ and inserting ‘‘an international insti-
tute for’’;
(3) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘through the
Institute for Transportation Research and Education
and’’ and inserting a comma;
(4) in paragraph (3) by inserting a comma after
‘‘South Florida’’; and
(5) in paragraph (6) by striking ‘‘through the
Institute for Transportation Research and Edu-
cation’’.
SEC. 269. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
(a) CONTRACTING
FOR ENGINEERING
AND DESIGN
SERVICES.—Section 12(b) of the Federal Transit Act (49
U.S.C. App. 1608(b)) is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULES FOR ENGINEERING AND DE-
SIGN CONTRACTS.—
147
‘‘(A) PERFORMANCE
AND
AUDITS.—Any
contract or subcontract awarded in accordance
with paragraph (4), whether funded in whole or
in part with Federal transit funds, shall be per-
formed and audited in compliance with cost
principles contained in the Federal acquisition
regulations of part 31 of title 48 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
‘‘(B) INDIRECT
COST
RATES.—Instead of
performing its own audits, a recipient of funds
under a contract or subcontract awarded in ac-
cordance with paragraph (4) shall accept indi-
rect cost rates established in accordance with the
Federal acquisition regulations for 1-year appli-
cable accounting periods by a cognizant govern-
ment agency or independent certified public ac-
countant if such rates are not currently under
dispute. Once a firm’s indirect cost rates are ac-
cepted, the recipient of such funds shall apply
such rates for the purposes of contract esti-
mation, negotiation, administration, reporting,
and contract payment and shall not be limited
by administrative or de facto ceilings in accord-
ance with section 15.901(c) of such title 48. A re-
cipient of such funds requesting or using the cost
148
and rate data described in this subparagraph
shall notify any affected firm before such request
or use. Such data shall be confidential and shall
not be accessible or provided, in whole or in
part, to any other firm or to any government
agency which is not part of the group of agencies
sharing cost data under this subparagraph, ex-
cept by written permission of the audited firm.
If prohibited by law, such cost and rate data
shall not be disclosed under any circumstances.
‘‘(C) STATE
OPTION.—Subparagraphs (A)
and (B) shall take effect 2 years after the date
of the enactment of this paragraph with respect
to all States; except that if a State, during such
2-year period, adopts by statute an alternative
process intended to promote engineering and de-
sign quality and ensure maximum competition
by professional companies of all sizes providing
engineering and design services, such subpara-
graphs shall not apply with respect to such
State.’’.
(b) RAIL TRACKAGE RIGHTS AGREEMENTS.—Section
12(c)(1) of such Act is amended by inserting ‘‘payments
for the capital portions of rail trackage rights agreements,’’
after ‘‘rights-of-way,’’.
149
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The first sentence of
section 12(f)(1) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘such
State of local’’ and inserting ‘‘such State or local’’.
(d) TURNKEY SYSTEM PROJECT.—Section 12(l) of
such Act is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(C) by striking ‘‘is’’ and in-
serting ‘‘may be’’; and
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘the date of the
enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the
enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991’’.
(e) SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS.—Section 12 of such Act
is further amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(n) SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a recipient of assistance
under this Act determines that facilities and equip-
ment and other assets (including land) acquired, in
whole or in part, with such assistance are no longer
needed for the purposes for which they were acquired,
the Secretary shall authorize the sale of the assets
with no further obligation to the Federal Government
if the Secretary determines that—
150
‘‘(A) there are no purposes eligible for as-
sistance under this Act for which the asset should
be used; and
‘‘(B) the proceeds from the sale of the asset
will be used by the recipient to procure items eli-
gible for capital assistance under this Act.
‘‘(2) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS.—The pro-
visions of this subsection shall be in addition to and
not in lieu of any other provision of law governing
use and disposition of facilities and equipment under
an assistance agreement.’’.
SEC. 270. PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY AND REAPPORTION-
MENT OF SECTION 16 FUNDS.
Section 16 of the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App.
1612) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the
semicolon at the end of paragraph (1);
(2) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the
end of paragraph (2) and inserting a period;
(3) in subsection (b) by striking paragraph (3)
and inserting the following:
‘‘Eligible capital expenses under this subsection may in-
clude, at the option of the recipient, the acquisition of trans-
portation services under a contract, lease, or other arrange-
ment.’’;
151
(4) in subsection (c)(4) by striking ‘‘the enact-
ment of the Federal Transit Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the
date of the enactment of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991’’;
(5) by adding at the end of subsection (c) the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
‘‘(5) PERIOD
OF
AVAILABILITY.—Sums appor-
tioned under this subsection shall be available for ob-
ligation by the State for a period of 2 years following
the close of the fiscal year for which the sums are ap-
portioned and any amounts remaining unobligated at
the end of such period shall be reapportioned among
the States for the succeeding fiscal year.’’;
(6) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘handicapped
and elderly individuals’’ and inserting ‘‘elderly per-
sons and persons with disabilities’’; and
(7) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘such individ-
uals’’ and inserting ‘‘such persons’’.
SEC. 271. RURAL TRANSIT PROGRAM.
The second sentence of section 18(a) of the Federal
Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App. 1614(a)) is amended by strik-
ing the final period.
SEC. 272. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Section 19 of the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. App.
1615) is amended—