I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1392
To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1993
Mr. FAWELL (for himself, Mr. PENNY, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. WALK-
ER, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. PETRI, Mr.
BALLENGER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. DORNAN, Mr.
BOEHNER, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. ORTON, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. KLUG, Mr.
SOLOMON, Mr. STUMP, and Mr. KNOLLENBERG) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations
A BILL
To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘Spending Priority Reform Act of 1993’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—
Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.
Sec. 2. Use of money for deficit reduction.
TITLE I—AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS
Sec. 101. Cooperative State Research Service—special research grants.
Sec. 102. Cooperative State Research Service—buildings and facilities.
TITLE II—COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY,
AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Department of Commerce
Sec. 201. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 202. International Trade Administration.
Subtitle B—Related Agencies
Sec. 211. Small Business Administration.
Subtitle C—Department of State
Sec. 221. Educational and cultural exchange programs.
Sec. 222. North/South Center.
TITLE III—DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
Sec. 301. Defense agencies—university grants.
Sec. 302. Defense agencies—electric vehicle technology.
Sec. 303. Army.
Sec. 304. Medical research.
Sec. 305. Navy.
Sec. 306. Air Force.
Subtitle B—Other Department of Defense Programs
Sec. 311. Defense health programs.
Subtitle C—Operations and Maintenance
Sec. 321. Self-powered locks.
Sec. 322. Athletic competitions.
Sec. 323. Army.
Sec. 324. Defense agencies.
Sec. 325. Hawaii volcano observatory.
TITLE IV—ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Corps of Engineers
Sec. 401. General investigations.
Sec. 402. Construction, general.
Subtitle B—Department of Energy
Sec. 411. General investigations.
TITLE V—INTERIOR APPROPRIATIONS
Sec. 501. National Park Service.
Sec. 502. United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
Sec. 503. National Forest Service.
TITLE VI—TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS
Sec. 601. Airway science grants.
Sec. 602. Highway research, development, and technology.
Sec. 603. Federal-aid highways.
Sec. 604. Federal highway demonstration projects.
Sec. 605. Transit planning and research.
TITLE VII—TREASURY, POSTAL SERVICE, AND GENERAL
GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS
Sec. 701. General Services Administration.
Sec. 702. Office of Personnel Management.
TITLE VIII—VETERANS AFFAIRS, HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Department of Veterans Affairs
Sec. 801. Construction grants.
Subtitle B—Independent Agencies
Sec. 811. EPA—research and development.
Sec. 812. EPA—abatement, control, and compliance.
Sec. 813. EPA—buildings and facilities.
Sec. 814. Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Sec. 815. NASA—research and development.
Sec. 816. NASA—construction of facilities.
Subtitle C—Department of Housing and Urban Development
Sec. 821. Special purpose grants.
TITLE IX—BLUE SMOKE AND MIRRORS
Sec. 901. Sense of the Congress.
SEC. 2. USE OF MONEY FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.
It is the sense of the Congress that any money re-
turned to the Treasury as a result of this Act should be
deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury to be ap-
plied against the Federal budget deficit.
TITLE I—AGRICULTURE
APPROPRIATIONS
SEC. 101. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE—SPE-
CIAL RESEARCH GRANTS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for special research grants provided by the
Secretary of Agriculture under section 2(c) of the
Act of August 4, 1965 (7 U.S.C. 450i(c)); and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Agriculture, Rural Devel-
opment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
341; 106 Stat. 878–879); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
amounts provided for special research grants (Conference
Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 102–815,
pages 10–12):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Aflatoxin (IL) .................................................................................................
$134,000
Agribusiness management (MS) .....................................................................
$75,000
Agricultural diversification (HI) ....................................................................
$154,000
Agricultural management systems (MA) ........................................................
$261,000
Agricultural processing (GA) .........................................................................
$50,000
Agricultural trade (ND) .................................................................................
$350,000
Alfalfa (KS) ....................................................................................................
$125,000
Alternative cropping systems (Southeast) ......................................................
$278,000
Alternative crops (ND) ...................................................................................
$700,000
Alternative marine and fresh water species (MS) ..........................................
$275,000
Alternative pest control (AR) .........................................................................
$1,400,000
Alternative to dinoseb (OR) ...........................................................................
$225,000
Animal waste disposal (MI) ............................................................................
$120,000
Apple quality research (MI) ...........................................................................
$94,000
Aquaculture (general) .....................................................................................
$316,000
Aquaculture (MS) ...........................................................................................
$700,000
Aquaculture research (IL) ..............................................................................
$200,000
Aquaculture (LA) ...........................................................................................
$390,000
Asparagus yield decline (MI) ..........................................................................
$94,000
Babcoc Institute (WI) ....................................................................................
$75,000
Bean and beet (MI) ........................................................................................
$189,000
Beef carcass evaluation and identification (IA, NY, GA, TX, IL) ................
$210,000
Beef fat content (IA) ......................................................................................
$237,000
Biodiesel research (MO) .................................................................................
$50,000
Broom snakeweed (NM) .................................................................................
$200,000
Canola (KS) ....................................................................................................
$100,000
Celery fusarium (MI) .....................................................................................
$39,000
Center for animal health and productivity (PA) ............................................
$134,000
Center for rural studies (VT) .........................................................................
$37,000
Chesapeake Bay aquaculture (MD) ...............................................................
$437,000
Competitiveness of agricultural products (WA) .............................................
$800,000
CONSOIL (WI) ..............................................................................................
$725,000
Controlled environment production systems (PA) ..........................................
$240,000
Cool season legume research (ID, WA) .........................................................
$387,000
Cottonseed extraction and oil refining (TX) ..................................................
$75,000
Cranberry/blueberry disease and breeding (NJ) ............................................
$260,000
Dairy goat research (TX) ...............................................................................
$75,000
Delta rural revitalization (MS) ......................................................................
$175,000
Dogwood anthracnose (GA, NC, TN) ............................................................
$137,000
Dried bean (ND) ............................................................................................
$100,000
Eastern filbert blight (OR) ............................................................................
$85,000
Environmental research (NY) ........................................................................
$575,000
Expanded wheat pasture (OK) .......................................................................
$337,000
Export development (KY) ..............................................................................
$227,000
Farm computer technology (GA) ...................................................................
$100,000
Farm and rural business finance (IL, AK) ....................................................
$125,000
Fish marketing (OR, RI) ...............................................................................
$340,000
Floriculture (HI) ............................................................................................
$296,000
Food and Agriculture Policy Institute (IA, MO) ...........................................
$750,000
Food irradiation (IA) .....................................................................................
$237,000
Food marketing policy center (CT) ................................................................
$393,000
Food processing center (NE) .........................................................................
$50,000
Food safety consortium (AR, KS, IA) ...........................................................
$1,942,000
Food systems research group (WI) ................................................................
$261,000
Forestry marketing (VT, NH) .......................................................................
$50,000
Global change .................................................................................................
$2,000,000
Grasshopper biocontrol (ND) .........................................................................
$75,000
Great Plains agricultural policy center (KS, OK) .........................................
$100,000
Human nutrition research (NY) ....................................................................
$735,000
Human nutrition research (IA) ......................................................................
$500,000
Human nutrition (LA) ...................................................................................
$800,000
Improved dairy management practices (PA) ..................................................
$335,000
Integrated pest management ..........................................................................
$4,457,000
Integrated production systems (OK) ..............................................................
$190,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Iowa biotechnology consortium (IA) ...............................................................
$2,000,000
Livestock and dairy policy (NY, TX) .............................................................
$525,000
Lowbush blueberry research (ME) .................................................................
$185,000
Low-input agriculture (MN) ...........................................................................
$230,000
Maple research (VT) ......................................................................................
$99,000
Michigan Institute ..........................................................................................
$2,358,000
Midwest agricultural products ........................................................................
$700,000
Midwest plant biotechnology consortium ........................................................
$2,865,000
Milk safety (PA) .............................................................................................
$184,000
Minor crop pest control (HI) .........................................................................
$285,000
Minor use animal drugs (IR–4) .....................................................................
$464,000
Multi-commodity research (OR) .....................................................................
$300,000
Multi-cropping strategies for aquaculture ......................................................
$150,000
National biological impact assessment ...........................................................
$300,000
Nematode resistance genetic engineering (NM) .............................................
$150,000
New uses for agricultural products (OH) ......................................................
$140,000
Non-food agricultural products (NE) .............................................................
$110,000
Oil from jojoba (NM) .....................................................................................
$200,000
Oregon—Mass. biotechnology (MA) ...............................................................
$256,000
Peach tree short life (SC) ..............................................................................
$192,000
Perishable commodities (GA) .........................................................................
$250,000
Pest control alternatives (SC) ........................................................................
$125,000
Pesticide clearance (IR–4) .............................................................................
$3,500,000
Pesticide impact assessment ...........................................................................
$2,968,000
Pesticide research (WA) .................................................................................
$667,000
Phytophthora root rot (NM) ..........................................................................
$150,000
Potato research ...............................................................................................
$1,435,000
Potato utilization (ND) ..................................................................................
$250,000
Poultry (GA) ...................................................................................................
$516,000
Preservation and processing research (OK) ...................................................
$267,000
Procerum root disease (VA) ...........................................................................
$25,000
Product development and marketing center (ME) .........................................
$221,000
Red River Corridor (MN, ND) .......................................................................
$200,000
Regional barley gene mapping project ...........................................................
$412,000
Regionalized implications of farm programs (MO, TX) ................................
$348,000
Rural development centers (PA, IA, ND, MS, OR) ......................................
$500,000
Rural environmental research (IL) ................................................................
$125,000
Rural housing needs (NE) .............................................................................
$80,000
Rural policies institute (AR, NE, MO) ..........................................................
$692,000
Russian wheat aphid (WA, OR, CA) .............................................................
$437,000
Safflower research (ND, MT) ........................................................................
$250,000
Seafood and aquaculture harvesting, processing, and marketing (MS) .........
$361,000
Seafood research (OR) ...................................................................................
$327,000
Small fruit research (OR, WA, ID) ...............................................................
$187,000
Soil and water research (OH) ........................................................................
$240,000
Southwest consortium for plant genetics and water resources ......................
$400,000
Soybean bioprocessing (IA) ............................................................................
$328,000
Soybean cyst nematode (MO) .........................................................................
$359,000
STEEP II—water quality in Northwest (ID, WA, OR) ................................
$980,000
Stone fruit decline (MI) .................................................................................
$283,000
Subirrigation research (MI) ...........................................................................
$531,000
Sunflower insects (ND, SD) ...........................................................................
$200,000
Sustainable agriculture and natural resources (PA) ......................................
$100,000
Sustainable agriculture systems (NE) ...........................................................
$70,000
Swine research (MN) ......................................................................................
$140,000
TCK smut (wheat) .........................................................................................
$250,000
Tropical and subtropical .................................................................................
$3,320,000
Urban pests (GA) ...........................................................................................
$76,000
Water conservation (KS) ................................................................................
$94,000
Water conservation (NV) ...............................................................................
$200,000
Water management (AL) ...............................................................................
$398,000
Water quality ..................................................................................................
$8,950,000
Weed control (ND) .........................................................................................
$500,000
Wheat genetic research (KS) .........................................................................
$159,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
White mold research (OH) .............................................................................
$55,000
Wild rice research (MN) .................................................................................
$88,000
Wood utilization research (OR, MS, MI) .......................................................
$4,153,000
Wool research (TX) ........................................................................................
$250,000
World food systems (IN, OH) ........................................................................
$368,000
SEC. 102. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE—
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the construction of buildings and facilities
of the Cooperative State Research Service; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Agriculture, Rural Devel-
opment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
341; 106 Stat. 879); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
amounts provided for buildings and facilities (Conference
Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 102–815,
pages 15–16):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Poultry Center of Excellence (AR) .................................................................
$3,189,000
Agriculture Research Complex-Environmental Stress Lab (AZ) ...................
$1,100,000
Alternative pest control containment and quarantine, University of Califor-
nia ...............................................................................................................
$178,000
Grape Importation Facility, University of California at Davis ......................
$582,000
Biotechnology Institute, University of Florida-Alachua .................................
$276,000
Center for Advanced Water Technology, Savannah, GA ...............................
$376,000
National Laboratory for Environmentally Sound Production Agriculture,
Tifton, GA ..................................................................................................
$1,293,000
Vidalia Onion Storage Res. Facility (GA) .....................................................
$194,000
Center for Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture (HI) ..........................................
$3,311,000
Biotechnology Facility (ID) ............................................................................
$431,000
Biotechnology Center, Northwestern University (IL) ....................................
$517,000
Molecular and Cellular Biotechnology Facility (IN) ......................................
$2,155,000
Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Kansas State University (KS) ............
$1,353,000
Presque Isle Farm building construction (ME) .............................................
$776,000
Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of
Maryland (MD) ...........................................................................................
$862,000
Center for hunger, poverty, nutrition and policy (MS) ..................................
$484,000
Food Toxicology Center, Michigan State University .....................................
$4,616,000
Biological Technology Center for Water and Wetlands Resources (MS) ......
$86,000
Bioscience Research Laboratory, Montana State University .........................
$915,000
Biochemistry and Biology, University of Nevada ..........................................
$215,000
Plant Bioscience Facility, Rutgers University (NJ) ......................................
$2,623,000
Cornell Research Greenhouse (NY) ...............................................................
$376,000
New York Botanical Garden ..........................................................................
$3,697,000
Bowman-Gray Center at Wake Forest (NC) .................................................
$3,684,000
Food Processing Pilot Plant—NCI (ND) ......................................................
$375,000
Inst/Ag Health Science and Rural Medicine, Univ. of North Dakota (ND) .
$1,864,000
Inst/Ag and Rural Human Research Development, Minot State University
(ND) ...........................................................................................................
$1,939,000
Seed Research and Regulatory Facility, North Dakota State University
(ND) ...........................................................................................................
$431,000
Plant Science Research Facility, University of Toledo (OH) ........................
$237,000
Seafood Center, Oregon State University (OR) .............................................
$1,824,000
Center for Food Marketing, St. Joseph’s University (PA) ............................
$2,336,000
Building consolidation, University of Rhode Island (RI) ...............................
$431,000
Northern Plains Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State University
(SD) ............................................................................................................
$875,000
Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Research Complex, University
of Tennessee in Knoxville (TN) ..................................................................
$797,000
Nursery Crop Research Station (TN) ............................................................
$367,000
Inst/Biosciences and Technology, Texas A & M (TX) ...................................
$603,000
Biotechnology Laboratory, Utah State University (UT) ...............................
$658,000
Agriculture Biotechnology Facility, Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VA) ......
$880,000
Animal Disease Biotechnology Facility, Washington State University (WA)
$2,258,000
Agriculture Biotechnology/Genetics Facility, University of Wisconsin/Madi-
son (WI) .....................................................................................................
$2,161,000
College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (WI) .
$86,000
Environmental Simulation Facility, University of Wyoming (WY) ...............
$431,000
TITLE II—COMMERCE, JUSTICE,
AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY,
AND RELATED AGENCIES AP-
PROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Department of
Commerce
SEC. 201. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN-
ISTRATION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for construction, the National Ocean Service,
the National Marine Fisheries Service, oceanic and
atmospheric research, National Weather Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
construction, and miscellaneous projects; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference, where so designated.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Com-
merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
395; 106 Stat. 1849–1850); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are as follows (Con-
ference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Report
102–918, pages 50–66):
(1) NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE.—
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Great Lakes Mapping Projects ......................................................................
$465,000
South Carolina Cooperative Geodetic Survey .................................................
$554,000
Land Information Systems .............................................................................
$1,674,000
Observation buoys (CA) (conference) .............................................................
$140,000
Chesapeake Bay Observation buoys (conference) ..........................................
$400,000
Institute for Marine Engineers (conference) ..................................................
$500,000
South Carolina Wetland Demonstration Project ...........................................
$1,800,000
CZM program administration ........................................................................
$3,597,000
Charleston Special Area Management plan ...................................................
$960,000
Hawaii Humpback Marine Sanctuary Institute .............................................
$144,000
(2) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE.—
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Stuttgart Aquaculture (AR) ...........................................................................
$576,000
Winter Run Chinook Salmon (conference) .....................................................
$500,000
Center for Shark Research .............................................................................
$140,000
Hawaii Stock Management .............................................................................
$500,000
Fish Cooperative Institute ..............................................................................
$384,000
Hawaiian Monk Seals .....................................................................................
$520,000
Stellar Sea Lion Recovery Plan .....................................................................
$1,440,000
Hawaiian Sea Turtles .....................................................................................
$240,000
Atlantic Blue Fin Tuna Project .....................................................................
$300,000
Pacific pelagic species management ...............................................................
$1,606,000
Beluga Whale Committee ...............................................................................
$192,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Dolphin Safe Technologies .............................................................................
$500,000
East Coast Observers .....................................................................................
$700,000
Export Strategies/Mahi Mahi .........................................................................
$768,000
Andromous Fishery Project ............................................................................
$186,000
Fish Oils .........................................................................................................
$900,000
(3) OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH.—
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
VENTS ...........................................................................................................
$2,496,000
S.E. U.S. FOCI Program ...............................................................................
$1,000,000
Upper New England Marine Research ...........................................................
$1,900,000
NOAA Undersea Research Program ..............................................................
$15,998,000
(4) NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE.—
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Agriculture and fruit frost .............................................................................
$2,316,000
Fire Weather Services ....................................................................................
$449,000
(5) NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC AD-
MINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION.—
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Boston Biotechnology Innovation Center (conference) ..................................
$1,000,000
Woods Hole Marine Biology Center ...............................................................
$1,000,000
U. of New Hampshire Biology Center ...........................................................
$15,000,000
Mystic, CT Maritime Education and Research Center (conference) .............
$1,000,000
NMFS Charleston Fisheries Laboratory ........................................................
$700,000
Beaufort, NC Laboratory ...............................................................................
$182,000
Juneau/Kodiak Laboratory A&E ....................................................................
$100,000
SEC. 202. INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for special research grants provided for the
International Trade Administration;
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Com-
merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriation Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
395; 106 Stat. 1851); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re-
port 102–918, page 67):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Tailored Clothing Technology Corporation (TC 2) ........................................
$3,149,000
National Textile Center ..................................................................................
$7,448,000
New Materials Center .....................................................................................
$2,850,000
Subtitle B—Related Agencies
SEC. 211. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for salaries and expenses; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Com-
merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
395; 106 Stat. 1862–1863); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are as follows:
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Ohio Dept. of Development International Trade project ...............................
$500,000
Small Business Databases (PA) and Transportation Linkages ....................
$1,000,000
Worchester Centrum and Exhibition Hall Infrastructure ..............................
$1,500,000
St. Vincent/Francis Center for Global Competitiveness .................................
$800,000
Pittsburgh District Pilot Project ....................................................................
$100,000
St. Louis Biomedical Center ..........................................................................
$400,000
Washington State University Research ..........................................................
$500,000
Hazard Community College ............................................................................
$750,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Morgan County High School ..........................................................................
$1,000,000
Kansas Small Business Development Center .................................................
$500,000
Vermont Small Business Development Center ...............................................
$1,000,000
Technical Assistance Univ. of Arkansas ........................................................
$465,000
Univ. of Kansas - Science & Tech ..................................................................
$4,185,000
Massachusetts Biotech Institute ....................................................................
$1,395,000
New York City Library ..................................................................................
$930,000
Indiana State University Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ......................
$1,395,000
Center for Manufacturing Products ...............................................................
$465,000
St. Louis Biomedical Center ..........................................................................
$400,00
Subtitle C—Department of State
SEC. 221. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE PRO-
GRAMS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the general enhancement of the exchange
programs of the United States Information Agency;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Com-
merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
395; 106 Stat. 1870–1871); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re-
port 102–918, page 97):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
World Scholar-Athlete Games ........................................................................
$800,000
General Enhancement for Exchange Programs .............................................
$9,250,000
SEC. 222. NORTH/SOUTH CENTER.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the North/South Center; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Com-
merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat-
ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–
395; 106 Stat. 1872); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNT.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re-
port 102–918, page 99):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
North/South Center at the University of Miami, in Miami, Florida .............
$8,700,000
TITLE III—DEFENSE
APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation
SEC. 301. DEFENSE AGENCIES—UNIVERSITY GRANTS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for university grants; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1893–1895); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, pages 14–15):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Texas Regional Institute for Environmental Studies .....................................
$5,000,000
University of Maryland ...................................................................................
$7,500,000
University of Scranton ...................................................................................
$3,500,000
Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute .........................
$15,000,000
Northeastern University .................................................................................
$9,000,000
Colorado State University ..............................................................................
$5,000,000
Louisiana State University .............................................................................
$4,000,000
Illinois Institute of Technology ......................................................................
$5,000,000
Loma Linda University ..................................................................................
$5,000,000
University of Minnesota .................................................................................
$2,000,000
University of Miami, Florida ..........................................................................
$2,000,000
University of Michigan ...................................................................................
$500,000
University of Pennsylvania .............................................................................
$7,500,000
Villanova University .......................................................................................
$2,000,000
Medical College of Ohio ..................................................................................
$1,000,000
Rochester Institute of Technology ..................................................................
$3,000,000
Bryant College of Rhode Island .....................................................................
$2,000,000
Bradley University of Illinois .........................................................................
$7,500,000
University of South Florida ...........................................................................
$2,000,000
Science Center of Connecticut ........................................................................
$3,000,000
National Biomedical Research Foundation ....................................................
$10,000,000
SEC. 302. DEFENSE AGENCIES—ELECTRIC VEHICLE TECH-
NOLOGY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for electrical vehicle demonstration projects;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1893); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 118):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in the State of Hawaii ........
$5,000,000
For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in Sacramento, CA, involv-
ing the McClellan Air Force Base and the Sacramento Municipal Utility
District ........................................................................................................
$2,500,000
SEC. 303. ARMY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for industrial preparedness and manufacturing
technology development programs; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1890–1891); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, pages 125–126):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the establishment of a flexible manufacturing center at the Scranton
Army Ammunition Plant ............................................................................
$7,500,000
For large-scale investigation of the GP–160 Vaccine for Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome ..................................................................................
$20,000,000
SEC. 304. MEDICAL RESEARCH.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for medical research; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference, in the case of $185,000,000 of the
amount provided for the item listed in sub-
section (c) relating to breast cancer research.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1890–1891); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 119):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Prostate cancer research ................................................................................
$2,000,000
Breast cancer research ...................................................................................
$210,000,000
AIDS research ................................................................................................
$58,891,000
SEC. 305. NAVY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for naval research, development, testing, and
evaluation; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference, in the case of the item listed in sub-
section (c) relating to the West Virginia High
Technology Corporation.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1891–1892); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, pages 126):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the West Virginia High Technology Corporation ....................................
$1,500,000
For the National Center for Acoustics, Mississippi Resource Development
Corporation .................................................................................................
$1,000,000
SEC. 306. AIR FORCE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for projects of the Space Surveillance Network
Improvement Program; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1892); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 136):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
To continue the Advanced Electro-Optical System project at the Air Force
Maui Optical Station ..................................................................................
$39,500,000
To continue the research program on development of coal-based, high ther-
mal stability and endothermic jet fuels ......................................................
$2,000,000
Subtitle B—Other Department of
Defense Programs
SEC. 311. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAMS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for efforts to prevent brown tree snakes from
entering Hawaii from Guam; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1897); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 151):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For brown tree snakes ....................................................................................
$1,000,000
Subtitle C—Operations and
Maintenance
SEC. 321. SELF-POWERED LOCKS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for providing, to the services and agencies
funded by the Department of Defense, self-powered
locks necessary to initiate a retrofit program to re-
place locks that do not meet current specifications;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1878–1883); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 55):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the Defense Logistics Agency to provide to the Services and Agencies
self-powered locks .......................................................................................
$15,000,000
SEC. 322. ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the World University Competition, the
1996 Summer Olympics, and World Cup USA 1994;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1884–1885); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 51):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the World University Competition ..........................................................
$6,000,000
For the 1996 Summer Olympics ....................................................................
$2,000,000
For World Cup USA 1994 .............................................................................
$9,000,000
SEC. 323. ARMY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for procurement of extended cold weather
clothing systems; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1879); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 62):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the procurement of Extended Cold Weather Clothing Systems ..............
$36,000,000
SEC. 324. DEFENSE AGENCIES.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the study, assessment, and identification of
nuclear waste disposal by the former Soviet Union,
and Project PEACE; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1928); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, pages 27 and 171):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the study, assessment, and identification of nuclear waste disposal by
the former Soviet Union in the Arctic region ............................................
$10,000,000
For Project PEACE .......................................................................................
$25,000,000
SEC. 325. HAWAII VOLCANO OBSERVATORY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for monitoring volcanic activity affecting the
United States Army Pohakuloa training area; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106
Stat. 1881); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re-
port 102–1015, page 77):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for monitoring volcanic activity af-
fecting the United States Army Pohakuloa Training Area ........................
$500,000
TITLE IV—ENERGY AND WATER
APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Corps of Engineers
SEC. 401. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for surveys and planning activities of the Army
Corps of Engineers; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel-
opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;
106 Stat. 1317); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re-
port 102–866, page 25):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Kaumalapau Harbor, HI ................................................................................
$500,000
SEC. 402. CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for construction of water resource projects of
the Army Corps of Engineers; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel-
opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;
106 Stat. 1321–1322); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re-
port 102–866, pages 35–41):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Molly Ann’s Brook, NJ ..................................................................................
$1,000,000
St. George Harbor, AK ..................................................................................
$3,000,000
Cochiti Lake, NM ...........................................................................................
$1,900,000
Subtitle B—Department of Energy
SEC. 411. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for energy supply, research, and development
activities; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel-
opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;
106 Stat. 1333); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re-
port 102–866, pages 73–74):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Bishop Science Center, HI .............................................................................
$10,000,000
Ambulatory Research and Education Building, Oregon Health Sciences
University ...................................................................................................
$10,000,000
Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, Louisiana State Univer-
sity, Baton Rouge .......................................................................................
$10,000,000
Advanced Technologies Institute, University of Connecticut .........................
$10,000,000
Biomedical Research Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham .........
$10,000,000
Cancer Treatment Facility for the Indiana University School of Medicine at
Indianapolis ................................................................................................
$10,000,000
Cancer Institute of New Jersey ......................................................................
$10,000,000
Northeast Environmental Resource and Renewal Facility, Mayfield, Penn-
sylvania .......................................................................................................
$6,800,000
Center for Advanced Industrial Process, Washington State University,
Washington .................................................................................................
$8,000,000
Hahnemann University Ambulatory Care and Teaching Center in Philadel-
phia, Pennsylvania ......................................................................................
$10,000,000
Midwest Plant Biotechnology Consortium (U. of Chicago and Washington
U.) ...............................................................................................................
$2,500,000
TITLE V—INTERIOR
APPROPRIATIONS
SEC. 501. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the operation of the National Park Service;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of the Interior
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1381–1383); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re-
port 102–901, pages 28–30):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Birmingham Heritage Corridor, AL ..............................................................
$250,000
Horseshoe Curve NHL, PA ............................................................................
$250,000
National Constitution Center, PA ..................................................................
$250,000
Native Hawaiian Culture and Arts Program, HI ..........................................
$2,000,000
Wheeling National Heritage Area, WV ..........................................................
$2,324,000
William Douglas Outdoor Education Center, CA ..........................................
$250,000
August Canal NHL, GA .................................................................................
$75,000
Botto House, American Labor Museum, NJ .................................................
$140,000
Kershaw House, SC ........................................................................................
$125,000
Lincoln Center, IL ..........................................................................................
$1,700,000
Walk on the Mountain, WA ...........................................................................
$2,000,000
Mimbres NM, NM ..........................................................................................
$150,000
SEC. 502. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for construction projects; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of the Interior
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1379–1380); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re-
port 102–901, pages 23–26):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Appropriate technology transfer for rural areas ............................................
$1,300,000
Forensics Laboratory, OR ..............................................................................
$195,000
Lake Champlain activities ..............................................................................
$500,000
Biodiversity initiative, University of Nevada-Reno, NV .................................
$1,050,000
Patuxent (Maintenance) .................................................................................
$100,000
Leetown (environmental and handicapped fishing complex) ..........................
$75,000
Co-op unit vacancies .......................................................................................
$73,000
Audubon Species Institute, LA ......................................................................
$8,672,000
Bowerman Basin NWR, WA ..........................................................................
$500,000
California Condor breeding facility, CA .........................................................
$400,000
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, LA .............................................
$2,900,000
Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, OR ..................................................
$600,000
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, VA ..................................................
$400,000
Coquille Point National Wildlife Refuge, OR .................................................
$400,000
Craig Brook NFH, ME ..................................................................................
$400,000
DC Booth Hatchery, SD ................................................................................
$1,250,000
Dexter National Fish Hatcher, NM ...............................................................
$1,428,000
Hakalau National Wildlife Refuge, HI ..........................................................
$300,000
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, AK ..............................................................
$2,500,000
Las Vegas National Wildlife Refuge, NM ......................................................
$2,000,000
National Education and Training Center, WV ..............................................
$15,000,000
Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, OH ...........................................................
$2,700,000
Pacific Institute of Natural Sciences, OR ......................................................
$1,700,000
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, MD ........................................................
$626,000
Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge, OK ....................................................
$450,000
Wichita Environmental Education Center, KA ..............................................
$2,000,000
SEC. 503. NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for projects of the National Forest Service;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of the Interior
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1397–1399); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re-
port 102–901, pages 47–55):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Termiticides at Gulfport, MS .........................................................................
$120,000
Blue Mountains Institute at LaGrande, OR ..................................................
$100,000
Hardwoods ecology at Asheville, NC ..............................................................
$200,000
Integrated forest management center, AR .....................................................
$200,000
Global change at Raleigh, NC ........................................................................
$72,000
Southwestern forestry, Fort Collins, CO ........................................................
$300,000
Timber and Watershed at Honolulu, HI ........................................................
$100,000
Genetics at Rhinelander, WI ..........................................................................
$65,000
Management Practices at Parsons, WV .........................................................
$60,000
Timber bridges for West Virginia University, WV ........................................
$200,000
Tannins at Pineville, LA ................................................................................
$100,000
Columbia Gorge economic development grants ..............................................
$750,000
Fire protection for Burton/Santini lots at Lake Tahoe .................................
$200,000
Ohio Harbor tree planting, OH ......................................................................
$500,000
Urban Forestry:.
Chicago, IL .............................................................................................
$1,000,000
Ohio Arbor, OH ......................................................................................
$500,000
Tacoma, WA ...........................................................................................
$100,000
Bremerton, WA .......................................................................................
$50,000
Port Orchard, WA ..................................................................................
$50,000
Atlanta, GA .............................................................................................
$500,000
Northern New Jersey, NJ ......................................................................
$500,000
Chesapeake Bay forest management ..............................................................
$150,000
Center for Semi-Arid Agroforestry .................................................................
$200,000
Aerial Fire Depot, Missoula, MT ...................................................................
$600,000
Ranger District Office, Helena, MT ..............................................................
$650,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Ranger District Office, Androscoggin, NH ....................................................
$1,350,000
Winding Stair NRA, OK ................................................................................
$1,100,000
Oconee National Forest ..................................................................................
$1,000,000
Southeast Alaska Visitors Center ...................................................................
$2,500,000
Toiyabe National Forest (Kyle Station) ........................................................
$100,000
Monongahela National Forest ........................................................................
$911,000
Timberline Lodge ...........................................................................................
$771,000
Multnomah Falls ............................................................................................
$250,000
Green Mountain National Forest ...................................................................
$375,000
Kisatchie National Forest storm damage ......................................................
$350,000
White Mountain National Forest ...................................................................
$350,000
Timber roads in Dixie National Forest ..........................................................
$8,500,000
Recreation roads in Dixie National Forest ....................................................
$250,000
TITLE VI—TRANSPORTATION
APPROPRIATIONS
SEC. 601. AIRWAY SCIENCE GRANTS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the airway science program; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Transpor-
tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1525–1526); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re-
port 102–924, page 32):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Middle Tennessee State University ................................................................
$556,000
Embry-Ridele University (FL, AL) ................................................................
$11,500,000
Henderson State University (AR) ..................................................................
$2,235,000
University of Alaska .......................................................................................
$6,884,000
SEC. 602. HIGHWAY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND TECH-
NOLOGY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for highway research, development, and tech-
nology; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Transpor-
tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1527); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re-
port 102–924, page 34):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
University of California (San Diego) research on the use of composite ma-
terials in construction .................................................................................
$1,600,000
SEC. 603. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for construction and maintenance of Federal-
Aid Highways; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Transpor-
tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1529–1531); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re-
port 102–924, pages 38–40):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Highway Safety and Economic Development Demonstration (MS) ..............
$6,400,000
Climbing Lane and Highway Safety Demonstration (PA) ............................
$3,840,000
Kentucky Bridge Demonstration Project .......................................................
$6,400,000
Virginia HOV Safety Demonstration Project ................................................
$1,600,000
Bicycle Transportation Demonstration Project (MI) .....................................
$304,000
Pennsylvania Reconstruction Demonstration Project ....................................
$6,400,000
Pennsylvania Toll Road Demonstration Project ............................................
$3,200,000
SEC. 604. FEDERAL HIGHWAY DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for Federal Highway Administration dem-
onstration projects; and
(2) the demonstration projects were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Transpor-
tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1531); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
amounts provided for Federal Highway Administration
studies (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518,
House Report 102–924, pages 40–41):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Appalachian corridors:.
New York: Corridor ‘‘T’’ ........................................................................
$16,000,000
West Virginia:.
Corridor ‘‘G’’ or ‘‘H’’ ......................................................................
$80,000,000
Corridor ‘‘L’’ ...................................................................................
$24,000,000
Sky Harbor Airport Access Road, AZ ............................................................
$6,000,000
Lock and Dam No. 4 Road (Pine Bluff, AR) ................................................
$6,400,000
Highway 156 Bypass (Hollister), CA .............................................................
$960,000
Access Road to Ontario International Airport, CA ........................................
$3,200,000
Florida: Northeast Dade Bikepaths:.
City of North Miami ...............................................................................
$400,000
City of North Miami Beach ....................................................................
$400,000
Florida U.S. 27 (Palm Beach County) ..........................................................
$1,760,000
Biscayne Boulevard/U.S. 1 Connect Port/Miami to I–395, FL .....................
$2,400,000
17th Street tunnel project (Fort Lauderdale) ...............................................
$4,912,000
Lake Lanier Access Project, GA ....................................................................
$2,624,000
Kihei-Haleakal Highway, HI ..........................................................................
$4,000,000
Saddle Road, Island of Hawaii, HI ................................................................
$960,000
U.S. 63 from Waterloo to Minnesota State Border, IA .................................
$3,520,000
5th Street to 6th Street, Waterloo, IA ...........................................................
$2,000,000
Des Moines to Burlington Connector, IA .......................................................
$8,000,000
I–65 and State Rt 46 Interchange Project (Columbus), IN ..........................
$6,400,000
Muncie State Road 67 (I–69 to Muncie Bypass), IN ....................................
$4,992,000
U.S. 54/Kellogg Freeway, KS ........................................................................
$6,160,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Woodrow Wilson Bridge, MD .........................................................................
$5,000,000
M–84 Bay Road -- Saginaw and Bay Counties, MI ......................................
$100,000
Grand Rapids I–96 Bypass, MI .....................................................................
$768,000
Bristol Road Relocation Project (Flint and Genesse Counties), MI ..............
$1,440,000
U.S. 31 (City of Niles and City of Benton Harbor), MI ...............................
$320,000
Maple Road Extension, Walled Lake, MI ......................................................
$2,000,000
Multi-Modal Transportation Center, St. Louis, MO ......................................
$640,000
I–90 Interchange, Belgrade, MT ....................................................................
$2,000,000
U.S. 64 (East of Jordan Lake to U.S.–64/U.S.–1 Interchange in Cary),
NC ..............................................................................................................
$4,640,000
Newcastle Verrillion Bridge, SD ....................................................................
$3,296,000
Route 21 widening -- RR/Highway Bridge ‘‘NJ Transit Bridge’’ (Newark),
NJ ...............................................................................................................
$1,200,000
I–280 Down Connector (including acquisition for First Street Ramp), NJ .
$1,504,000
Route 21 Viaduct Advanced Property Acquisition .........................................
$2,880,000
Airport Access from I–25 (Albuqerque) Sunport Boulevard, NM .................
$4,400,000
I–15 Sahara Avenue Interchange (Las Vegas), NV ......................................
$11,460,000
U.S. 395 Extension from South Virginia to Mt. Rose Highway ...................
$2,700,000
I–15 Spring Mountain Interchange (Las Vegas), NV ...................................
$6,000,000
Design Improvements on Miller Highway (New York City), NY ..................
$1,696,000
Exit 26 Bridge (Mohawk River Valley) (Schenectady County), NY ..............
$1,280,000
Pond Creek Road, Grant County, OK ...........................................................
$3,360,000
Donora Industrial Park Access Road (Donora--Monessen Bridge/I–70), PA
$640,000
U.S. Route 6 Bypass/widening (Wysox, Towanda and Tunkhannock Bor-
oughs), PA ..................................................................................................
$1,280,000
U.S. 202 between King of Prussia and Montgomeryville, PA .......................
$1,440,000
I–81 (vicinity of Wilkes-Barre) (Exits 43–46 corridor project), PA .............
$2,880,000
SR 56 Rehabilitation, PA ...............................................................................
$9,600,000
Walnut Street/Bluff Furnace Park (Chattanooga), TN ................................
$320,000
U.S.-Mexico Border Highway (Loop 375) (El Paso), TX .............................
$1,600,000
U.S. Route 89 between Farmington and Ogden, UT ....................................
$2,400,000
I–15/University Interchange, Provo, UT .......................................................
$4,240,000
Christiansted Bypass (St. Croix), VI .............................................................
$544,000
Snohomish 
County 
HOV 
(Evert 
and 
Seattle)/park-n-ride 
projects
(Lynwood), WA ...........................................................................................
$320,000
State Route 509, East-West Corridor project (Port of Tacoma), WA ..........
$1,520,000
Scenic Byways Project: U.S. 101 (WA, OR, CA) ..........................................
$4,000,000
SEC. 605. TRANSIT PLANNING AND RESEARCH.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for transit planning and research; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Department of Transpor-
tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1536–1537); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re-
port 102–924, page 49):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Florida International University and University of South Florida ................
$3,000,000
TITLE VII—TREASURY, POSTAL
SERVICE, AND GENERAL GOV-
ERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS
SEC. 701. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for design and construction grants funded
through the Federal Buildings Fund, under the ju-
risdiction of the General Services Administration;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Treasury, Postal Service,
and General Government Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–393; 106 Stat. 1744–1745); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5488, House Re-
port 102–919, pages 6–7 and 51–53):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Construction of a new parking facility in Newark, New Jersey ....................
$9,000,000
Expansion of the Scranton, Pennsylvania Mail Facility ................................
$3,000,000
Centers for Disease Control, site, acquisition, and improvements in Atlanta,
Georgia .......................................................................................................
$26,000,000
For construction of a Center of Disease Control laboratory in Atlanta,
Georgia .......................................................................................................
$30,000,000
For construction of a Center of Disease Control campus in Atlanta, Geor-
gia ...............................................................................................................
$15,000,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
For construction of a new United States Courthouse facility in Brooklyn,
New York ....................................................................................................
$15,000,000
For a Courthouse in Albany, Georgia ............................................................
$6,000,000
SEC. 702. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for the establishment of health promotion and
disease prevention programs for Federal employees;
and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
and
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Treasury, Postal Service,
and General Government Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–393; 106 Stat. 1754–1755); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5488, House Re-
port 102–919, page 59):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Expanded efforts for health promotion for federal employees .......................
$1,000,000
TITLE VIII—VETERANS AFFAIRS,
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL-
OPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT
AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A—Department of
Veterans Affairs
SEC. 801. CONSTRUCTION GRANTS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for construction grants; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Veterans
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1576); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re-
port 102–902, page 14):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Relocation of the regional office in Jackson, MS ...........................................
$16,300,000
Planning and design of a joint project with the College of Medicine for the
relocation of medical school functions and renovation of buildings 2, 3,
and 5 at the Mountain Home, TN, VA Medical Center ............................
$2,800,000
Subtitle B—Independent Agencies
SEC. 811. EPA—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for research and development; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Veterans
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1596); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.
(c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the
amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
(Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re-
port 102–902, pages 41–43):
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Adirondack Destruction Assessment Program ...............................................
$500,000
Center for Environmental Management .........................................................
$3,200,000
National Academy of Sciences study of wetlands ..........................................
$400,000
American Water Works Association Research Foundation ............................
$575,000
Southeast Environmental Research Center ....................................................
$2,000,000
Center for Excellence in Polymer Research and Environmental Study .........
$1,200,000
Nutrient loading research project in Boston Harbor and Massachusetts
Bay. These funds should be allocated to the Naragansett Laboratory ......
$400,000
Interagency coordination of Great Lakes .......................................................
$125,000
Water Environment Research Foundation .....................................................
$700,000
Energy and Environmental Research Center at the University of North
Dakota for a cradle-to-grave assessment and control technology develop-
ment program for toxic metal emissions ....................................................
$1,600,000
Recycling and reuse technology development project at the Iowa Waste Re-
duction Center ............................................................................................
$700,000
Urban waste management research at the University of New Orleans .........
$700,000
National ultraviolet monitoring center, a national program to monitor the
ultraviolet flux reaching the Earth’s surface. The monitoring center is to
be established at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA ...........................
$700,000
Program, project, or activity:
Amount of
rescission:
Pollution prevention research and development center at the University of
Connecticut .................................................................................................
$1,450,000
Center for Analysis of Environmental Change to provide comprehensive ap-
proaches needed for wise management of the Columbia and Snake Rivers
ecosystem resources ....................................................................................
$250,000
SEC. 812. EPA—ABATEMENT, CONTROL, AND COMPLIANCE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set
aside for abatement, control, and compliance; and
(2) the amounts were—
(A) not authorized;
(B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
(C) not the subject of congressional com-
mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;
and
(D) first added by the Committee of Con-
ference.
(b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
(1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which
were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
propriations made by the Departments of Veterans
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993
(Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1596–1597); and
(2) the underlying appropriations for the
amounts.