†
HR 1495 EAS
report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 6,
2004.
(B) DEAUTHORIZATIONS.—As of the date of
enactment of this Act, the following projects are
not authorized:
(i) The uncompleted portions of the
project authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i)
of the Water Resources Development Act of
2000 (114 Stat. 2682), C–44 Basin Storage
Reservoir of the Comprehensive Everglades
Restoration Plan, at a total cost of
$147,800,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $73,900,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $73,900,000.
(ii) The uncompleted portions of the
project authorized by section 203 of the
Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90–
483; 82 Stat. 740), Martin County, Florida,
modifications to Central and South Florida
Project, as contained in Senate Document
101, 90th Congress, 2d Session, at a total
cost of $15,471,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $8,073,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $7,398,000.
†
HR 1495 EAS
(iii) The uncompleted portions of the
project authorized by section 203 of the
Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90–
483; 
Stat. 
740), 
East 
Coast
Backpumping, St. Lucie–Martin County,
Spillway Structure S–311 of the Central
and South Florida Project, as contained in
House Document 369, 90th Congress, 2d
Session, at a total cost of $77,118,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000
and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$21,994,000.
(13) MIAMI
HARBOR, MIAMI, FLORIDA.—The
project for navigation, Miami Harbor, Miami, Flor-
ida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 25,
2005, at a total cost of $125,270,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $75,140,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $50,130,000.
(14) PICAYUNE STRAND, FLORIDA.—The project
for ecosystem restoration, Picayune Strand, Florida:
Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 15,
2005, at a total cost of $375,330,000 with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $187,665,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
†
HR 1495 EAS
(15) EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS.—
The project for ecosystem restoration and recreation,
East St. Louis and Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the
Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a
total cost of $208,260,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non-Federal
cost of $73,350,000.
(16) 
PEORIA
RIVERFRONT, 
ILLINOIS.—The
project for ecosystem restoration, Peoria Riverfront,
Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July
28, 2003, at a total cost of $18,220,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $11,840,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $6,380,000.
(17) WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, ILLINOIS.—
The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River,
Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July
18, 2006, at a total cost of $17,220,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $11,193,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $6,027,000.
(18) DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, DES
MOINES, IOWA.—The project for flood damage reduc-
tion, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines,
Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March
28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an esti-
†
HR 1495 EAS
mated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $3,813,000.
(19) BAYOU
SORREL
LOCK, LOUISIANA.—The
project for navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana:
Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3,
2005, at a total cost of $9,680,000. The costs of con-
struction of the project are to be paid 1⁄2 from
amounts appropriated from the general fund of the
Treasury and 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from
the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
(20) MORGANZA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LOU-
ISIANA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for hurricane
and storm damage reduction, Morganza to the
Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the Chief
of Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July
22, 2003, at a total cost of $886,700,000 with an
estimated Federal cost of $576,355,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $310,345,000.
(B) OPERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE.—The
operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation,
and replacement of the Houma Navigation
Canal lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway floodgate features that provide for in-
land waterway transportation shall be a Federal
†
HR 1495 EAS
responsibility, in accordance with section 102 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(33 U.S.C. 2212; Public Law 99–662).
(21) PORT OF IBERIA, LOUISIANA.—The project
for navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of
the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at
a total cost of $131,250,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $105,315,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $25,935,000, except that the Secretary, in
consultation with Vermillion and Iberia Parishes,
Louisiana, is directed to use available dredged mate-
rial and rock placement on the south bank of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway and the west bank of the
Freshwater Bayou Channel to provide incidental
storm surge protection.
(22) POPLAR ISLAND EXPANSION, MARYLAND.—
The project for the beneficial use of dredged material
at Poplar Island, Maryland, authorized by section
537 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
(110 Stat. 3776), and modified by section 318 of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat.
2678), is further modified to authorize the Secretary
to construct the expansion of the project in accordance
with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March
31, 2006, at an additional total cost of $260,000,000,
†
HR 1495 EAS
with an estimated Federal cost of $195,000,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $65,000,000.
(23) SMITH ISLAND, MARYLAND.—The project for
ecosystem restoration, Smith Island, Maryland: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers dated October 29, 2001,
at a total cost of $15,580,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $10,127,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $5,453,000.
(24) ROSEAU RIVER, ROSEAU, MINNESOTA.—The
project for flood damage reduction, Roseau River,
Roseau, Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers
dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of
$25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$13,820,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$11,280,000.
(25) 
MISSISSIPPI
COASTAL
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT, HANCOCK, HARRISON, AND JACKSON COUN-
TIES, MISSISSIPPI.—The project for hurricane and
storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration,
Mississippi coastal improvement project, Hancock,
Harrison, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi: Report
of the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at
a total cost of $107,690,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $37,690,000.
†
HR 1495 EAS
(26) ARGENTINE, EAST BOTTOMS, FAIRFAX-JER-
SEY CREEK, AND NORTH KANSAS LEVEES UNITS, MIS-
SOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES AT KANSAS CITIES,
MISSOURI AND KANSAS.—The project for flood damage
reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey
Creek, and North Kansas Levees units, Missouri River
and tributaries at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kan-
sas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December
19, 2006, at a total cost of $65,430,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $42,530,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $22,900,000.
(27) SWOPE
PARK
INDUSTRIAL
AREA, 
MIS-
SOURI.—The project for flood damage reduction,
Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: Report of the
Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a
total cost of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $11,037,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $5,943,000.
(28) GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS
INLET, NEW JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and
storm damage reduction, Great Egg Harbor Inlet to
Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of
Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of
$54,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$35,069,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
†
HR 1495 EAS
$19,291,000, and at an estimated total cost of
$202,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost
of $101,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$101,250,000.
(29) HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, LIBERTY STATE
PARK, NEW JERSEY.—The project for environmental
restoration, Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State
Park, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers
dated August 25, 2006, at a total cost of $34,100,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
(30) MANASQUAN
TO
BARNEGAT
INLETS, NEW
JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and storm dam-
age reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat Inlets, New
Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Decem-
ber 30, 2003, at a total cost of $71,900,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an es-
timated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic beach
nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with
an estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $59,840,000.
(31) RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION
BEACH, NEW JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and
†
HR 1495 EAS
storm damage reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy
Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report of the
Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total
cost of $115,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost
of $74,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$40,200,000, and at an estimated total cost of
$6,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year
life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of
$3,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$3,250,000.
(32) SOUTH RIVER, NEW JERSEY.—The project
for hurricane and storm damage reduction and eco-
system restoration, South River, New Jersey: Report
of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a
total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $42,800,000.
(33) SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW
MEXICO.—The project for flood damage reduction,
Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico: Report
of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at
a total cost of $24,840,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $8,690,000.
†
HR 1495 EAS
(34) MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.—The project
for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Montauk
Point, New York: Report of the Chief of Engineers
dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of $14,600,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
(35) HOCKING
RIVER
BASIN, MONDAY
CREEK,
OHIO.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for ecosystem
restoration, Hocking River Basin, Monday
Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers
dated August 24, 2006, at a total cost of
$20,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$13,440,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $7,540,000.
(B) WAYNE NATIONAL FOREST.—
(i) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary, in
cooperation with the Secretary of Agri-
culture, may construct other project features
on property that is located in the Wayne
National Forest, Ohio, owned by the United
States and managed by the Forest Service
as described in the report of the Corps of
Engineers entitled ‘‘Hocking River Basin,
Ohio, Monday Creek Sub-Basin Ecosystem
†
HR 1495 EAS
Restoration Project Feasibility Report and
Environmental Assessment’’.
(ii) COST.—Each project feature car-
ried out on Federal land shall be designed,
constructed, operated, and maintained at
full Federal expense.
(iii) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIA-
TIONS.—There is authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this subparagraph
$1,270,000.
(36) BLOOMSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA.—The project
for flood damage reduction, Bloomsburg, Pennsyl-
vania: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Janu-
ary 25, 2006, at a total cost of $44,500,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $15,575,000
(37) PAWLEYS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA.—The
project for hurricane and storm damage reduction,
Pawleys Island, South Carolina: Report of the Chief
of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost
of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of
$21,200,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year
life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of
†
HR 1495 EAS
$10,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$10,600,000.
(38) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for naviga-
tion and ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi
Ship Channel, Texas, Channel Improvement
Project: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
June 2, 2003, at a total cost of $188,110,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $87,810,000
and 
an 
estimated 
non-Federal 
cost 
of
$100,300,000.
(B) NAVIGATIONAL
SERVITUDE.—In car-
rying out the project under subparagraph (A),
the Secretary shall enforce navigational servitude
in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, including,
at the sole expense of the owner of the facility,
the removal or relocation of any facility obstruct-
ing the project.
(39) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, BRAZOS
RIVER
TO
PORT
O’CONNOR, MATAGORDA
BAY
RE-
ROUTE, TEXAS.—The project for navigation, Gulf In-
tracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port O’Connor,
Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief
of Engineers dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost
†
HR 1495 EAS
of $17,280,000. The costs of construction of the project
are to be paid 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from
the general fund of the Treasury and 
1⁄2 from
amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways
Trust Fund.
(40) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, HIGH IS-
LAND
TO
BRAZOS
RIVER, TEXAS.—The project for
navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Sabine
River to Corpus Christi, Texas: Report of the Chief of
Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of
$14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project
are to be paid 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from
the general fund of the Treasury and 
1⁄2 from
amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways
Trust Fund.
(41) LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN PHASE I,
TEXAS.—The project for flood damage reduction and
ecosystem restoration, Lower Colorado River Basin
Phase I, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $110,730,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
(42) CRANEY
ISLAND
EASTWARD
EXPANSION,
VIRGINIA.—The project for navigation, Craney Island
Eastward Expansion, Virginia: Report of the Chief of