256
SEC. 5033. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA. 
(a) GENERAL NAVIGATION FEATURES.—In carrying 
out the project for navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, 
authorized by section 101(b)(1) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the Secretary shall 
consider the dredging of the mooring basin and construction 
of the inner harbor facilities to be general navigation fea-
tures for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of 
project costs. 
(b) REVISION
OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.—The 
Secretary shall revise the partnership agreement for the 
project to reflect the change required by subsection (a). 
SEC. 5034. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to per-
form operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of author-
ized and completed levees on the White River between Au-
gusta and Clarendon, Arkansas. 
(b) REIMBURSEMENT.—After performing the oper-
ation, maintenance, and rehabilitation under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the Sec-
retary of the Interior of an amount equal to the costs allo-
cated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such oper-
ation, maintenance, and rehabilitation. 
SEC. 5035. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, 
Des Arc, Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel
257
scour along the White River threaten the existing project 
and whether the scour is as a result of a design deficiency. 
If the Secretary determines that such conditions exist as 
a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry out meas-
ures to eliminate the deficiency. 
SEC. 5036. HELENA AND VICINITY, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall accept as fulfilling the non-Federal 
cost-sharing responsibilities for the project for flood control, 
Helena and Vicinity, Arkansas, authorized by section 401 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4112), the non-Federal cash contribution of $568,000 and 
the lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
dredged material disposal areas provided by the non-Fed-
eral sponsor as of September 1, 2003, and the Secretary 
shall not seek to recover any reimbursement from the non-
Federal sponsor related to advanced payments to, or work 
performed for, the non-Federal sponsor under the authority 
of sections 103 and 104 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213, 2214). 
SEC. 5037. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage 
in the vicinity of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine 
if the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the damage is the re-
sult of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall
258
carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 
111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i). 
SEC. 5038. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MIS-
SOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased silta-
tion and streambank erosion in the St. Francis River 
Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, to determine if the siltation 
or erosion, or both, are the result of a Federal flood control 
project and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
or erosion, or both, are the result of a Federal flood control 
project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the siltation or erosion, or both. 
SEC. 5039. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS. 
(a) MINIMUM FLOWS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out section 304 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2601), the Secretary shall implement alter-
natives BS–3 and NF–7, as described in the White 
River Minimum Flows Reallocation Study Report, 
Arkansas and Missouri, dated July 2004. 
(2) COST SHARING.—Reallocation of storage and 
installation of facilities under this subsection shall be 
considered fish and wildlife enhancement that pro-
vides national benefits and shall be a Federal expense 
in accordance with section 906(e)(1) of the Water Re-
259
sources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2283(e)(1)). 
(3) OFFSET.—In carrying out this subsection, 
losses to hydropower shall be offset by a reduction, not 
to exceed $17,000,000, in the costs allocated to hydro-
power, as determined by the present value of the esti-
mated replacement cost of the electrical energy and 
capacity at the time of the implementation. 
(b) FISH HATCHERY.—In operating the fish hatchery 
at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, authorized by section 105 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), 
losses to hydropower shall be offset by a reduction, not to 
exceed $2,200,000, in the costs allocated to hydropower, as 
determined by the present value of the estimated replace-
ment cost of the electrical energy and capacity at the time 
of the implementation. 
(c) REPEAL.—Section 374 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 321) is repealed. 
SEC. 5040. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA. 
Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A–220) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$10,300,000’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$10,300,000’’; 
(2) by adding at the end the following:
260
‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of 
planning and design work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the part-
nership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the 
project.’’; and 
(3) by aligning the remainder of the text of sub-
paragraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
paragraph (2) of this section). 
SEC. 
5041. 
CONTRA 
COSTA 
CANAL, 
OAKLEY 
AND 
KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; MALLARD SLOUGH, 
PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA. 
Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by 
adding at the end the following: ‘‘All planning, study, de-
sign, and construction on the project shall be carried out 
by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, Cali-
fornia.’’. 
SEC. 5042. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of 
water quality degradation within Dana Point Harbor, 
California, to determine if the degradation is the result of