I 
118TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 7116 
To strengthen certain provisions relating to restrictions on robocalls and 
telemarketing, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 29, 2024 
Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SORENSEN, 
and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To strengthen certain provisions relating to restrictions on 
robocalls and telemarketing, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 
‘‘Do Not Disturb Act’’. 
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for 
this Act is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 
TITLE I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
Sec. 101. Robocall restrictions. 
Sec. 102. Text message authentication and trace back study. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Sec. 103. Annual robocall report. 
Sec. 104. Disclosure required for robocalls using AI. 
Sec. 105. Enhanced penalties for violations involving AI voice or text message 
impersonation. 
Sec. 106. Certain requirements for VoIP service providers. 
Sec. 107. Tracking of top 100 illegal robocall campaigns. 
Sec. 108. Offering of robocall-blocking service at no charge to customer. 
Sec. 109. Telephone solicitation. 
Sec. 110. Commission defined. 
TITLE II—FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 
Sec. 201. Addition of text message to the definition of telemarketing. 
Sec. 202. Adoption of regulations on inbound telephone calls and expanded call-
ing time restrictions. 
Sec. 203. Disclosure required for telemarketing using AI. 
Sec. 204. Enhanced penalties for violations of telemarketing rules involving AI 
voice or text message impersonation. 
Sec. 205. Commission defined. 
TITLE I—FEDERAL 
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
SEC. 101. ROBOCALL RESTRICTIONS. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 227(a) of the Commu-
nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(a)) is amended— 
(1) by striking paragraph (1); 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para-
graph (1); 
(3) by inserting before paragraph (3) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(2) ROBOCALL.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The term ‘robocall’ 
means a call made or text message sent— 
‘‘(i) using equipment, whether hard-
ware, software, or a combination thereof 
and including an automatic telephone dial-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
ing system, that makes a call or sends a 
text message to— 
‘‘(I) stored telephone numbers; or 
‘‘(II) telephone numbers pro-
duced using a random or sequential 
number generator; or 
‘‘(ii) using an artificial or prerecorded 
voice or an artificially generated message. 
‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—For purposes of sub-
paragraph (A)(i), the term ‘robocall’ does not 
include a call made or text message sent using 
equipment that requires substantial human 
intervention to make or send the call or text 
message.’’; 
(4) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para-
graph (7); and 
(5) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(5) TEXT MESSAGE.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘text mes-
sage’ means a message consisting of text, im-
ages, sounds, or other information that is trans-
mitted to or from a device that is identified as 
the receiving or transmitting device by means of 
a 10-digit telephone number, N11 service code, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
short code telephone number, or email address, 
or that is transmitted through application-to- 
person messaging, and includes— 
‘‘(i) a short message service (com-
monly referred to as ‘SMS’) message; 
‘‘(ii) a multimedia message service 
(commonly referred to as ‘MMS’) message; 
and 
‘‘(iii) a rich communication service 
(commonly referred to as ‘RCS’) message. 
‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—The term ‘text mes-
sage’ does not include a real-time, two-way 
voice or video communication. 
‘‘(6) TEXT
MESSAGING
SERVICE.—The term 
‘text messaging service’ means a service that enables 
the transmission or receipt of a text message, includ-
ing a service provided as part of or in connection 
with a voice service.’’. 
(b) RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF ROBOCALLS.—Section 
227(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
227(b)) is amended— 
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking 
‘‘AUTOMATED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘ROBOCALLS’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1)— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) in the matter preceding clause 
(i)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘any call’’ and in-
serting ‘‘a robocall’’; 
(II) by striking ‘‘a call’’ and in-
serting ‘‘a robocall’’; and 
(III) by striking ‘‘using any auto-
matic telephone dialing system or an 
artificial or prerecorded voice’’; and 
(ii) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘call’’ 
each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘robocall’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘any telephone call’’ 
and inserting ‘‘a robocall’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘using an artificial or 
prerecorded voice to deliver a message’’; 
and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘the call’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘the robocall’’; and 
(C) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘use 
an automatic telephone dialing system’’ and in-
serting ‘‘make robocalls’’; and 
(3) in paragraph (2)— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘calls 
made using an artificial or prerecorded voice’’ 
and inserting ‘‘robocalls’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
‘‘calls’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘robocalls’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (C), by striking 
‘‘calls’’ and inserting ‘‘robocalls’’; 
(D) in subparagraph (H), by striking 
‘‘calls’’ and inserting ‘‘robocalls’’; and 
(E) in subparagraph (I)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘calls’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘robocalls’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘be called’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘receive such robocalls’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS.— 
Section 227(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227(d)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)(A)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘any telephone call using 
any automatic telephone dialing system’’ and 
inserting ‘‘a robocall’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘or automatic telephone di-
aling system’’ and inserting ‘‘or robocall sys-
tem’’; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(2) in paragraph (3)— 
(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 
‘‘ARTIFICIAL OR PRERECORDED VOICE’’ and in-
serting ‘‘ROBOCALL’’; 
(B) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
(A), by striking ‘‘any artificial or prerecorded 
voice message via telephone’’ and inserting 
‘‘robocalls’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) 
by 
striking 
‘‘artificial 
or 
prerecorded telephone messages’’ and in-
serting ‘‘robocalls using an artificial or 
prerecorded voice or an artificially gen-
erated message’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘the call’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘the robocall’’; and 
(D) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘to 
make or receive other calls’’. 
(d) PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF MISLEADING OR 
INACCURATE CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.— 
Section 227(e)(8) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227(e)(8)) is amended— 
(1) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D); and 
(2) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub-
paragraph (C). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(e) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.—Section 227(f)(1) of 
the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(f)(1)) 
is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (B)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘automatic telephone dial-
ing systems’’ and inserting ‘‘robocalls’’; and 
(B) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(2) by striking subparagraph (C); and 
(3) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub-
paragraph (C). 
(f) ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ROBOCALLS 
AND TRANSMISSION
OF MISLEADING
OR INACCURATE 
CALLER
IDENTIFICATION
INFORMATION.—Section 
227(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
227(h)(2)) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A)— 
(A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘that a con-
sumer received a call in violation’’ and inserting 
‘‘a violation’’; 
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘that a con-
sumer received a call in violation’’ and inserting 
‘‘a violation’’; and 
(C) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘that a con-
sumer received a call in connection with which 
misleading or inaccurate caller identification in-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
formation was transmitted in violation’’ and in-
serting ‘‘a violation’’; 
(2) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘calls 
made in violation’’ and inserting ‘‘violations’’; and 
(3) in subparagraph (G)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘short-duration calls’’ and 
inserting ‘‘short-duration calls or high-volume, 
unlawful text messages’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘calls made in violation’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘violations’’. 
(g) INFORMATION SHARING.—Section 227(i) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(i)) is amend-
ed— 
(1) by striking paragraph (2); 
(2) by striking ‘‘SHARING’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘Not later than’’ and inserting ‘‘SHAR-
ING.—Not later than’’; and 
(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 
(B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively (and 
conforming the margins accordingly). 
(h) ROBOCALL BLOCKING SERVICE.—Section 227(j) 
of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(j)) 
is amended— 
(1) by striking paragraph (2); 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(2) by striking ‘‘SERVICE’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘Not later than’’ and inserting ‘‘SERV-
ICE.—Not later than’’; 
(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 
and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively 
(and conforming the margins accordingly); and 
(4) by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) as sub-
paragraphs (A) and (B), respectively (and con-
forming the margins accordingly). 
(i) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 270 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 
promulgate regulations to implement this section, includ-
ing the amendments made by this section. 
SEC. 102. TEXT MESSAGE AUTHENTICATION AND TRACE 
BACK STUDY. 
(a) STUDY.—The Commission shall conduct a study 
to determine the feasibility of— 
(1) creating an authentication framework with 
respect to text messages; and 
(2) requiring responses, from enforcement au-
thorities, with respect to requests to trace back the 
origin of text messages. 
(b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 
subsection (a), the Commission shall consult with relevant 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
stakeholders, including representatives of private industry, 
public interest organizations, and academia. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 
submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Com-
merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 
on the findings of the study conducted under subsection 
(a). 
(d) TEXT MESSAGE DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘text message’’ has the meaning given that term in 
section 227(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227(a)), as amended by this Act. 
SEC. 103. ANNUAL ROBOCALL REPORT. 
(a) NOTICE BY THE COMMISSION SEEKING REG-
ISTRATIONS.—Section 13(d)(2) of the Pallone-Thune 
Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and De-
terrence Act is amended— 
(1) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘AN-
NUAL NOTICE’’ and inserting ‘‘NOTICE’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘annually’’ and inserting ‘‘every 
3 years’’. 
(b) SUSPECTED
UNLAWFUL
ROBOCALL.—Section 
13(f)(3) of the Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse 
Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act is amended by 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
inserting ‘‘(not including a text message)’’ after ‘‘means 
a call’’. 
SEC. 104. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED FOR ROBOCALLS USING 
AI. 
Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(k) DISCLOSURE
REQUIRED
FOR
ROBOCALLS 
USING AI.—If a person making a robocall uses artificial 
intelligence to emulate a human being, such person shall 
disclose at the beginning of the call or text message the 
fact that artificial intelligence is being used.’’. 
SEC. 105. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS INVOLV-
ING AI VOICE OR TEXT MESSAGE IMPERSON-
ATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 227 of the Communica-
tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227), as amended by the 
preceding provisions of this Act, is further amended by 
adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(l) ENHANCED PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS IN-
VOLVING
AI VOICE
OR
TEXT
MESSAGE
IMPERSON-
ATION.—In the case of a violation of this section with re-
spect to which the party making the call or sending the 
text message uses artificial intelligence to impersonate an 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
individual or entity with the intent to defraud, cause 
harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value— 
‘‘(1) the maximum amount of the forfeiture 
penalty that may be imposed under subsection (b)(4) 
or (e)(5)(A) of this section or subsection (b) of sec-
tion 503 (as the case may be) shall be twice the 
maximum amount that may be imposed for such vio-
lation under such subsection without regard to this 
subsection; and 
‘‘(2) the maximum amount of the criminal fine 
that may be imposed under subsection (e)(5)(B) of 
this section or section 501 (as the case may be) shall 
be twice the maximum amount that may be imposed 
for such violation under such subsection or section 
without regard to this subsection.’’. 
(b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub-
section (a) shall apply with respect to violations occurring 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 106. CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR VOIP SERVICE 
PROVIDERS. 
Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227), as amended by the preceding provisions of 
this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘(m) CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR VOIP SERVICE 
PROVIDERS.— 
‘‘(1) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this subsection, 
the Commission shall promulgate regulations that do 
the following: 
‘‘(A) Require a provider of covered VoIP 
service to do the following: 
‘‘(i) Verify the identity of each cus-
tomer of the provider. 
‘‘(ii) Proactively and continuously 
monitor and analyze traffic on the service 
of the provider to determine whether any 
customer of the provider has engaged or is 
engaging in a pattern or practice of mak-
ing robocalls using the service of the pro-
vider. 
‘‘(iii) 
If 
the 
provider 
ascertains, 
through the monitoring and analysis re-
quired under clause (ii) or other means, 
that a customer of the provider has en-
gaged or is engaging in a pattern or prac-
tice of making robocalls using the service 
of the provider, conduct an investigation to 
determine expeditiously whether there is 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
substantial evidence that the customer has 
committed or is committing any violation 
of this section, or any other applicable law 
or 
regulation, 
with 
respect 
to 
such 
robocalls. 
‘‘(iv) If the provider determines in an 
investigation conducted under clause (iii) 
that there is substantial evidence that the 
customer has committed or is committing 
any violation described in such clause, not 
later than 10 days after making the deter-
mination— 
‘‘(I) take affirmative, effective 
measures to mitigate the origination 
or transmission of such robocalls; and 
‘‘(II) submit to the Robocall 
Mitigation Database of the Commis-
sion a public report containing such 
evidence and describing such inves-
tigation and measures. 
‘‘(B) Provide that the directors and offi-
cers (or any other individuals holding similar 
positions) and covered owners of a provider of 
covered VoIP service are jointly and severally 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
liable with the provider for any failure to com-
ply with— 
‘‘(i) 
the 
regulations 
promulgated 
under this subsection; or 
‘‘(ii) if the provider or any such direc-
tor, officer, other individual, or covered 
owner knew or should have known that the 
service of the provider was being used to 
facilitate robocalls in violation of any other 
regulation promulgated by the Commission 
or law enforced by the Commission, such 
regulation or law. 
‘‘(C) Establish a process by which, if a 
provider of covered VoIP service receives notice 
of suspected illegal traffic under the rules of the 
Commission and fails to sufficiently respond to 
the notice and mitigate the suspected illegal 
traffic, the provider can be temporarily sus-
pended from the Robocall Mitigation Database 
of the Commission and have the traffic of the 
provider blocked by downstream voice service 
providers and intermediate providers, pending a 
final determination by the Commission of 
whether to remove the provider of covered VoIP 
service from the Robocall Mitigation Database. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) COVERED
OWNER.—The term ‘cov-
ered owner’ means, with respect to a provider 
of covered VoIP service, any individual or entity 
that owns an equity interest (or the equivalent 
thereof) in the provider of 50 percent or great-
er. 
‘‘(B) COVERED VOIP SERVICE.—The term 
‘covered VoIP service’ means any of the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(i) An interconnected VoIP service. 
‘‘(ii) A non-interconnected VoIP serv-
ice.’’. 
SEC. 107. TRACKING OF TOP 100 ILLEGAL ROBOCALL CAM-
PAIGNS. 
(a) FRAMEWORK
AND TRACKING SYSTEM.— Not 
later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Commission shall develop a framework and track-
ing system to monitor the top 100 robocall campaigns that 
primarily involve robocalls that are illegal or suspected to 
be illegal. 
(b) MONTHLY REPORT.—Not later than 1 month 
after developing the framework and tracking system re-
quired by subsection (a), and monthly thereafter, the 
Commission shall make available to the public on the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
website of the Commission a report, with respect to the 
preceding 1-month period, on the campaigns described in 
such subsection. 
(c) ROBOCALL DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘robocall’’ has the meaning given such term in section 
227(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
227(a)), as amended by this Act. 
SEC. 108. OFFERING OF ROBOCALL-BLOCKING SERVICE AT 
NO CHARGE TO CUSTOMER. 
Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 227), as amended by the preceding provisions of 
this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(n) OFFERING OF ROBOCALL-BLOCKING SERVICE 
AT NO CHARGE TO CUSTOMER.— 
‘‘(1) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this subsection, 
the Commission shall promulgate regulations that 
require a provider of voice service to offer a robocall- 
blocking service to each customer of the provider, at 
no additional charge to the customer. 
‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) ROBOCALL-BLOCKING SERVICE.—The 
term ‘robocall-blocking service’ means a service 
that gives a customer of a provider of voice 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:18 Jan 31, 2024
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H7116.IH
H7116
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS