341
‘‘(ii) include the determination under 
clause (i) in the written findings of the 
audit. 
‘‘(5) MODIFICATION OF INVESTMENT REQUIRE-
MENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the 
Treasury determines that meeting the require-
ments under paragraph (2) with respect to the 
investment of a Fund is not practicable, or 
would result in adverse consequences for the 
Fund, the Secretary shall modify the require-
ments, as the Secretary determines to be nec-
essary. 
‘‘(B) CONSULTATION.—Before modifying a 
requirement under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary of the Treasury shall consult with the 
State regarding the proposed modification.’’; 
(2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ‘‘of the 
Treasury’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’; and 
(3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(f) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—There are au-
thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treas-
ury to pay expenses associated with investing the Fund
342
and auditing the uses of amounts withdrawn from the 
Fund—
‘‘(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
2007; and 
‘‘(2) such sums as are necessary for each subse-
quent fiscal year.’’. 
(c) INVESTMENT PROVISIONS FOR THE CHEYENNE 
RIVER SIOUX TRIBE AND LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE 
TRUST FUNDS.—Section 604 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 Stat. 2665) 
is amended—
(1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(c) INVESTMENTS.—
‘‘(1) 
ELIGIBLE
OBLIGATIONS.—Notwith-
standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall invest the amounts deposited 
under subsection (b) and the interest earned on 
those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of 
the United States issued directly to the Funds. 
‘‘(2) INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the 
Treasury shall invest the amounts in each of 
the Funds in accordance with the requirements 
of this paragraph.
343
‘‘(B) SEPARATE
INVESTMENTS
OF
PRIN-
CIPAL AND INTEREST.—
‘‘(i) 
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNT.—The 
amounts deposited in each Fund under 
subsection (b) shall be credited to an ac-
count within the Fund (referred to in this 
paragraph as the ‘principal account’) and 
invested as provided in subparagraph (C). 
‘‘(ii) INTEREST ACCOUNT.—The inter-
est earned from investing amounts in the 
principal account of each Fund shall be 
transferred to a separate account within 
the Fund (referred to in this paragraph as 
the ‘interest account’) and invested as pro-
vided in subparagraph (D). 
‘‘(iii) 
CREDITING.—The 
interest 
earned from investing amounts in the in-
terest account of each Fund shall be cred-
ited to the interest account. 
‘‘(C) INVESTMENT
OF
PRINCIPAL
AC-
COUNT.—
‘‘(i) 
INITIAL
INVESTMENT.—Each 
amount deposited in the principal account 
of each Fund shall be invested initially in 
eligible obligations having the shortest ma-
344
turity then available until the date on 
which the amount is divided into 3 sub-
stantially equal portions and those portions 
are invested in eligible obligations that are 
identical (except for transferability) to the 
next-issued publicly issued Treasury obli-
gations having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
maturity, and a 10-year maturity, respec-
tively. 
‘‘(ii) SUBSEQUENT INVESTMENT.—As 
each 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year eligible 
obligation matures, the principal of the 
maturing eligible obligation shall also be 
invested initially in the shortest-maturity 
eligible obligation then available until the 
principal is reinvested substantially equally 
in the eligible obligations that are identical 
(except for transferability) to the next-
issued publicly issued Treasury obligations 
having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year matu-
rities. 
‘‘(iii) DISCONTINUATION OF ISSUANCE 
OF OBLIGATIONS.—If the Department of 
the Treasury discontinues issuing to the 
public obligations having 2-year, 5-year, or
345
10-year maturities, the principal of any 
maturing eligible obligation shall be rein-
vested substantially equally in eligible obli-
gations that are identical (except for trans-
ferability) to the next-issued publicly 
issued Treasury obligations of the matu-
rities longer than 1 year then available. 
‘‘(D) INVESTMENT OF THE INTEREST AC-
COUNT.—
‘‘(i) 
BEFORE
FULL
CAPITALIZA-
TION.—Until the date on which each Fund 
is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
account of the Fund shall be invested in el-
igible obligations that are identical (except 
for transferability) to publicly issued 
Treasury obligations that have maturities 
that coincide, to the maximum extent prac-
ticable, with the date on which the Fund 
is expected to be fully capitalized. 
‘‘(ii) AFTER FULL CAPITALIZATION.—
On and after the date on which each Fund 
is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
account of the Fund shall be invested and 
reinvested in eligible obligations having the 
shortest maturity then available until the
346
amounts are withdrawn and transferred to 
fund the activities authorized under sub-
section (d)(3). 
‘‘(E) PAR PURCHASE PRICE.—The price to 
be paid for eligible obligations purchased as in-
vestments of the principal account shall not ex-
ceed the par value of the obligations so that the 
amount of the principal account shall be pre-
served in perpetuity. 
‘‘(F) HIGHEST YIELD.—Among eligible ob-
ligations having the same maturity and pur-
chase price, the obligation to be purchased shall 
be the obligation having the highest yield. 
‘‘(G) HOLDING
TO
MATURITY.—Eligible 
obligations purchased shall generally be held to 
their maturities. 
‘‘(3) ANNUAL REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ACTIVI-
TIES.—Not less frequently than once each calendar 
year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall review with 
the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as 
the ‘Tribes’) the results of the investment activities 
and financial status of the Funds during the pre-
ceding 12-month period. 
‘‘(4) AUDITS.—
347
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The activities of the 
Tribes in carrying out the plans of the Tribes 
for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration under 
section 602(a) shall be audited as part of the 
annual audit that the Tribes are required to 
prepare under the Office of Management and 
Budget Circular A–133 (or a successor circula-
tion). 
‘‘(B) DETERMINATION BY AUDITORS.—An 
auditor that conducts an audit under subpara-
graph (A) shall—
‘‘(i) determine whether funds received 
by the Tribes under this section during the 
period covered by the audit were used to 
carry out the plan of the appropriate Tribe 
in accordance with this section; and 
‘‘(ii) include the determination under 
clause (i) in the written findings of the 
audit. 
‘‘(5) MODIFICATION OF INVESTMENT REQUIRE-
MENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the 
Treasury determines that meeting the require-
ments under paragraph (2) with respect to the 
investment of a Fund is not practicable, or
348
would result in adverse consequences for the 
Fund, the Secretary shall modify the require-
ments, as the Secretary determines to be nec-
essary. 
‘‘(B) CONSULTATION.—Before modifying a 
requirement under subparagraph (A), the Sec-
retary of the Treasury shall consult with the 
Tribes regarding the proposed modification.’’; 
and 
(2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(f) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—There are au-
thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treas-
ury to pay expenses associated with investing the Funds 
and auditing the uses of amounts withdrawn from the 
Funds—
‘‘(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
2007; and 
‘‘(2) such sums as are necessary for each subse-
quent fiscal year.’’. 
SEC. 5113. EAST TENNESSEE. 
(a) EAST TENNESSEE DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘East Tennessee’’ means the counties of Blount, 
Knox, Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, and Sevier, Tennessee.
349
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
may establish a program to provide environmental assist-
ance to non-Federal interests in East Tennessee. 
(c) FORM OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction as-
sistance for water-related environmental infrastructure 
and resource protection and development projects in East 
Tennessee, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource pro-
tection and development. 
(d) OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
the project is publicly owned. 
(e) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Before providing assistance 
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest 
to provide for design and construction of the project 
to be carried out with the assistance. 
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Each partnership agree-
ment entered into under this subsection shall provide 
for the following: 
(A) PLAN.—Development by the Secretary, 
in consultation with appropriate Federal and
350
State officials, of a facilities or resource protec-
tion and development plan, including appro-
priate engineering plans and specifications. 
(B) LEGAL
AND
INSTITUTIONAL
STRUC-
TURES.—Establishment of such legal and insti-
tutional structures as are necessary to ensure 
the effective long-term operation of the project 
by the non-Federal interest. 
(3) COST SHARING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of 
the project cost under each partnership agree-
ment entered into under this subsection shall be 
75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
form of grants or reimbursements of project 
costs. 
(B) CREDIT FOR WORK.—The non-Federal 
interests shall receive credit for the reasonable 
cost of design work on a project completed by 
the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
partnership agreement with the Secretary for 
such project. 
(C) CREDIT FOR INTEREST.—In case of a 
delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
of a project that is the subject of an agreement 
under this section, the non-Federal interest
351
shall receive credit for reasonable interest in-
curred in providing the non-Federal share of 
the project cost. 
(D) LAND, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-
WAY CREDIT.—The non-Federal interest shall 
receive credit for land, easements, rights-of-
way, and relocations toward the non-Federal 
share of project cost (including all reasonable 
costs associated with obtaining permits nec-
essary for the construction, operation, and 
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent 
of total project cost. 
(E) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The 
non-Federal share of operation and mainte-
nance costs for projects constructed with assist-
ance provided under this section shall be 100 
percent. 
(f) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE 
LAWS.—Nothing in this section waives, limits, or other-
wise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to 
be carried out with assistance provided under this section. 
(g) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
352
1962d-5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this sec-
tion, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity 
with the consent of the affected local government. 
(h) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Ten percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may 
be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to ad-
minister projects under this section at Federal expense. 
(i) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$40,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until ex-
pended. 
SEC. 5114. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE. 
The Secretary shall—
(1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agri-
cultural Spur Levee, Tennessee, to determine the ex-
tent of levee modifications that would be required to 
make the levee and associated drainage structures 
consistent with Federal standards; 
(2) design and construct such modifications; 
and 
(3) after completion of such modifications, in-
corporate the levee into the project for flood control, 
Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the 
Act entitled ‘‘An Act for the control of floods on the 
Mississippi River and its tributaries, and for other
353
purposes’’, approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534–
539), commonly known as the ‘‘Flood Control Act of 
1928’’. 
SEC. 5115. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEN-
NESSEE. 
The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail 
system at the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ten-
nessee, authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works 
on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other pur-
poses’’, approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and ad-
jacent public property, including design and construction 
of support facilities. In carrying out such improvements, 
the Secretary is authorized to use funds made available 
by the State of Tennessee from any Federal or State 
source, or both. 
SEC. 5116. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE. 
The Secretary shall design and construct the project 
for flood damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in 
the Town Creek, Lenoir City, Loudon County, Tennessee, 
feasibility report of the Nashville district engineer, dated 
November 2000, under the authority of section 205 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwith-
standing section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 Stat. 1570). The non-Federal
354
share of the cost of the project shall be subject to section 
103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2213(m)). 
SEC. 5117. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—As part of the operation and 
maintenance of the project for navigation, Tennessee 
River, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, 
authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 927), the Secretary may 
enter into a partnership with a nonprofit entity to remove 
debris from the Tennessee River in the vicinity of Knox-
ville, Tennessee, by providing a vessel to such entity, at 
Federal expense, for such debris removal purposes. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$500,000. 
SEC. 5118. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, 
ARKANSAS, AND MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and 
nonprofit entities to address issues concerning managing 
groundwater as a sustainable resource through the Upper 
Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mis-
sissippi, and coordinating the protection of groundwater 
supply and groundwater quality with local surface water
355
protection programs. There is authorized to be appro-
priated $5,000,000 to carry out this section. 
SEC. 5119. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS. 
(a) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.—The Secretary, in con-
sultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local enti-
ties, shall develop, as expeditiously as practicable, a com-
prehensive plan for development of new technologies and 
innovative approaches for restoring, preserving, and pro-
tecting the Bosque River watershed within Bosque, Ham-
ilton, McLennan, and Erath Counties, Texas. The Sec-
retary, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, 
may carry out activities identified in the comprehensive 
plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for stabiliza-
tion and enhancement of land and water resources in the 
basin. 
(b) SERVICES
OF PUBLIC NON-PROFIT INSTITU-
TIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES.—In carrying out subsection 
(a), the Secretary may utilize, through contracts or other 
means, the services of public non-profit institutions and 
such other entities as the Secretary considers appropriate. 
(c) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—
(1) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of activities car-
ried out under this section the cost of planning, de-
sign, and construction work completed by or on be-
356
half of the non-Federal interests for implementation 
of measures constructed with assistance provided 
under this section. The amount of such credit shall 
not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of such 
activities. 
(2) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The non-
Federal share of the cost of operation and mainte-
nance for measures constructed with assistance pro-
vided under this section shall be 100 percent. 
(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$10,000,000. 
SEC. 5120. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS. 
(a) DALLAS COUNTY REGION DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘Dallas County region’’ means the city of 
Dallas, and the municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, 
Lancaster, Wilmer, Hutchins, Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, 
Glenn Heights, and Ferris, Texas. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
may establish a program to provide environmental assist-
ance to non-Federal interests in the Dallas County region. 
(c) FORM OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance under this 
section may be in the form of design and construction as-
sistance for water-related environmental infrastructure 
and resource protection and development projects in the
357
Dallas County region, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water re-
source protection and development. 
(d) OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
the project is publicly owned. 
(e) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Before providing assistance 
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest 
to provide for design and construction of the project 
to be carried out with the assistance. 
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Each partnership agree-
ment entered into under this subsection shall provide 
for the following: 
(A) PLAN.—Development by the Secretary, 
in consultation with appropriate Federal and 
State officials, of a facilities or resource protec-
tion and development plan, including appro-
priate engineering plans and specifications. 
(B) LEGAL
AND
INSTITUTIONAL
STRUC-
TURES.—Establishment of such legal and insti-
tutional structures as are necessary to ensure
358
the effective long-term operation of the project 
by the non-Federal interest. 
(3) COST SHARING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of 
the project costs under each partnership agree-
ment entered into under this subsection shall be 
75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
form of grants or reimbursements of project 
costs. 
(B) CREDIT FOR WORK.—The non-Federal 
interests shall receive credit for the reasonable 
cost of design work on a project completed by 
the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
partnership agreement with the Secretary for 
such project. 
(C) CREDIT FOR INTEREST.—In case of a 
delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
of a project that is the subject of an agreement 
under this section, the non-Federal interest 
shall receive credit for reasonable interest in-
curred in providing the non-Federal share of 
the project’s costs. 
(D) LAND, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-
WAY CREDIT.—The non-Federal interest shall 
receive credit for land, easements, rights-of-
359
way, and relocations toward the non-Federal 
share of project costs (including all reasonable 
costs associated with obtaining permits nec-
essary for the construction, operation, and 
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 
25 percent of total project costs. 
(E) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The 
non-Federal share of operation and mainte-
nance costs for projects constructed with assist-
ance provided under this section shall be 100 
percent. 
(f) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE 
LAWS.—Nothing in this section waives, limits, or other-
wise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal 
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project to 
be carried out with assistance provided under this section. 
(g) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding section 
221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this sec-
tion, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit enti-
ty. 
(h) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Ten percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may
360
be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to ad-
minister projects under this section at Federal expense. 
(i) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$40,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until ex-
pended. 
SEC. 5121. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood control, 
Trinity River and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 
2 of the Act entitled, ‘‘An Act authorizing the construc-
tion, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes’’, approved 
March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 18), is modified to—
(1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced 
Vision Plan for the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, 
Texas, dated December 2003 and amended in March 
2004, prepared by the non-Federal interest for the 
project; 
(2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior 
Levee Drainage Study Phase-I report, Dallas, 
Texas, dated September 2006, prepared by the non-
Federal interest; and 
(3) if the Secretary determines that the project 
is technically sound and environmentally acceptable, 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a
361
total cost of $459,000,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $298,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $161,000,000. 
(b) CREDIT.—
(1) IN-KIND
CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary 
shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of planning, design, and con-
struction work carried out by the non-Federal inter-
est before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work 
is integral to the project. 
(2) CASH
CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary 
shall accept funds provided by the non-Federal inter-
est for use in carrying out planning, engineering, 
and design for the project. The Federal share of 
such planning, engineering, and design carried out 
with non-Federal contributions shall be credited 
against the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project. 
SEC. 5122. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 575(a) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3789; 113 
Stat. 311) is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ‘‘, whether or not such works or 
actions are partially funded under the hazard mitigation
362
grant program of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency’’. 
(b) SPECIFIC PROJECTS.—Section 575(b) of such 
Act (110 Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 
end; 
(2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at 
the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by adding the following: 
‘‘(5) the project for flood control, Upper White 
Oak Bayou, Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4125).’’. 
SEC. 5123. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood damage re-
duction, environmental restoration, and recreation, John-
son Creek, Arlington, Texas, authorized by section 
101(b)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat 280), is modified to authorize the Sec-
retary to construct the project substantially in accordance 
with the report entitled ‘‘Johnson Creek: A Vision of Con-
servation’’, dated March 30, 2006, at a total cost of 
$80,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
363
$28,000,000, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible. 
(b) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project may be provided in cash or 
in the form of in-kind services or materials. 
(2) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
cost of planning, design, and construction work car-
ried out by the non-Federal interest for implementa-
tion of the project, if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project. 
(c) SPECIAL RULE.—In evaluating and implementing 
the project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal in-
terest to participate in the financing of the project in ac-
cordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184). 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 134 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
(119 Stat. 2263) is repealed. 
SEC. 5124. ONION CREEK, TEXAS. 
In carrying out the study for the project for flood 
damage reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, 
Onion Creek, Texas, the Secretary shall include the costs 
and benefits associated with the relocation of flood-prone
364
residences in the study area for the project in the period 
beginning 2 years before the date of initiation of the study 
and ending on the date of execution of the partnership 
agreement for construction of the project to the extent the 
Secretary determines such relocations are compatible with 
the project. The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of reloca-
tion of such flood-prone residences incurred by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agree-
ment for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
relocation of such residences is integral to the project. 
SEC. 5125. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is 
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘$20,000,000 for water supply 
and wastewater infrastructure’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$20,000,000 for water 
supply, wastewater infrastructure, and environ-
mental restoration’’; 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of work carried out by the non-
365
Federal interest before the date of the partner-
ship agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the 
project.’’; and 
(3) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) 
of this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by 
paragraph (2) of this section). 
SEC. 5126. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall accept funds from the National 
Park Service to restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Vir-
ginia. 
SEC. 5127. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASH-
INGTON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased sil-
tation in Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to 
determine if the siltation is the result of a Federal naviga-
tion project (including diverted flows from the Columbia 
River) and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the siltation as part 
of maintenance of the Federal navigation project.
366
SEC. 
5128. 
HAMILTON 
ISLAND 
CAMPGROUND, 
WASH-
INGTON. 
The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and con-
struct a campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at 
Hamilton Island (also know as ‘‘Strawberry Island’’) in 
Skamania County, Washington. 
SEC. 5129. PUGET ISLAND, WASHINGTON. 
The Secretary is directed to place dredged and other 
suitable material along portions of the Columbia River 
shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, between river miles 
38 to 47 in order to protect economic and environmental 
resources in the area from further erosion, at a Federal 
cost of $1,000,000. This action shall be coordinated with 
appropriate resource agencies and comply with applicable 
Federal laws. 
SEC. 5130. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON. 
Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2675) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘may con-
struct’’ and inserting ‘‘shall construct’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘and ecosystem restoration’’ 
after ‘‘erosion protection’’ each place it appears. 
SEC. 5131. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD 
CONTROL. 
(a) CHEAT AND TYGART RIVER BASINS, WEST VIR-
GINIA.—Section 581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Devel-
367
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 313) is 
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘flood control measures’’ and in-
serting ‘‘structural and nonstructural flood control, 
streambank protection, stormwater management, 
and channel clearing and modification measures’’; 
and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘with respect to measures that 
incorporate levees or floodwalls’’ before the semi-
colon. 
(b) PRIORITY COMMUNITIES.—Section 581(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3791) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 
(5); 
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (6) and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek wa-
tershed; and 
‘‘(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty’s Run 
River basin.’’. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 
581(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
368
(110 Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ‘‘$12,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000’’. 
SEC. 5132. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 371) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking ‘‘Nicholas,’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Gilmer,’’; 
(2) in subsection (h) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(i) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d–5b(b)), a non-Federal interest may include for any 
project undertaken under this section a nonprofit entity 
with the consent of the affected local government. 
‘‘(j) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Ten percent 
of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may 
be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to ad-
minister projects under this section at Federal expense.’’. 
SEC. 5133. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA. 
(a) CORPS
OF ENGINEERS.—Section 340 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4856; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
369
‘‘(h) CORPS OF ENGINEERS.—Ten percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to admin-
ister projects under this section at Federal expense.’’. 
(b) SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA DEFINED.—Section 
340(f) of such Act is amended by inserting ‘‘Nicholas,’’ 
after ‘‘Greenbrier,’’. 
(c) NONPROFIT
ENTITIES.—Section 340 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4856) is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(i) NONPROFIT ENTITIES.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d–5b(b)), a non-Federal interest may include for any 
project undertaken under this section a nonprofit entity 
with the consent of the affected local government.’’. 
SEC. 5134. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 
BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. 
Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b–13) is amended by adding 
at the end the following: 
‘‘(12) PERRIS, CALIFORNIA.—The project for 
flood control, Perris, California.
370
‘‘(13) THORNTON RESERVOIR, COOK COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—An element of the project for flood con-
trol, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois. 
‘‘(14) LAROSE
TO
GOLDEN
MEADOW, LOU-
ISIANA.—The project for flood control, Larose to 
Golden Meadow, Louisiana. 
‘‘(15) BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for 
flood control, Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an 
alternative to the project authorized by the first sec-
tion of the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938 
(52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the 
Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 
1414). 
‘‘(16) HALLS
BAYOU, TEXAS.—A project for 
flood control, Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an al-
ternative to the project for flood control, Buffalo 
Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 
101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610).’’. 
SEC. 5135. WAGE SURVEYS. 
Employees of the United States Army Corps of Engi-
neers who are paid wages determined under the last un-
designated paragraph under the heading ‘‘Administrative 
Provisions’’ of chapter V of the Supplemental Appropria-
tions Act, 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 Stat. 832) shall
371
be allowed, through appropriate employee organization 
representatives, to participate in wage surveys under such 
paragraph to the same extent as are prevailing rate em-
ployees under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 of title 5, 
United States Code. Nothing in such section 5343 shall 
be considered to affect which agencies are to be surveyed 
under such paragraph. 
SEC. 
5136. 
ADDITIONAL 
ASSISTANCE 
FOR 
CRITICAL 
PROJECTS. 
Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335–337; 114 
Stat. 2763A–220–221) is amended—
(1) by striking the undesignated paragraph re-
lating to Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(72) 
CHARLESTON, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.—
$10,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
wastewater collection systems, and stormwater sys-
tem improvements, Charleston, South Carolina.’’; 
(2) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relat-
ing to Placer and El Dorado Counties, California, as 
paragraph (73); 
(3) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relat-
ing to Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada 
Counties, California, as paragraph (74);
372
(4) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following: 
‘‘(75) INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.—$6,430,000 for 
environmental infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indi-
ana.’’; 
(5) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relat-
ing to St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76); 
and 
(6) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(77) 
ST. 
CLAIR
COUNTY, 
ALABAMA.—
$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, St. 
Clair County, Alabama. 
‘‘(78) 
CRAWFORD
COUNTY, 
ARKANSAS.—
$35,000,000 
for 
water 
supply 
infrastructure, 
Crawford County, Arkansas. 
‘‘(79) ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES, 
CALIFORNIA.—$25,000,000 for recycled water treat-
ment facilities within the East Bay Municipal Utility 
District service area, Alameda and Contra Costa 
Counties, California. 
‘‘(80) ARCADIA, SIERRA MADRE, AND UPLAND, 
CALIFORNIA.—$33,000,000 for water and waste-
water infrastructure, Arcadia, Sierra Madre, and 
Upland, 
California, 
including 
$13,000,000 
for 
stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
373
‘‘(81) BIG BEAR AREA REGIONAL WASTEWATER 
AGENCY, CALIFORNIA.—$15,000,000 for water rec-
lamation and distribution, Big Bear Area Regional 
Wastewater Agency, California. 
‘‘(82) BRAWLEY COLONIA, IMPERIAL COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—$1,400,000 for water infrastructure 
to improve water quality in the Brawley Colonia 
Water District, Imperial County, California. 
‘‘(83) CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT, CALI-
FORNIA.—$23,000,000 for water and wastewater in-
frastructure for the Contra Costa Water District, 
California. 
‘‘(84) EAST BAY, SAN FRANCISCO, AND SANTA 
CLARA AREAS, CALIFORNIA.—$4,000,000 for a de-
salination project to serve the East Bay, San Fran-
cisco, and Santa Clara areas, California. 
‘‘(85) 
IMPERIAL
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$10,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
a wastewater disinfection facility and polishing sys-
tem, to improve water quality in the vicinity of 
Calexico, California, on the southern New River, Im-
perial County, California. 
‘‘(86) LOS
ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—
$3,000,000 for wastewater and water related infra-
374
structure, Diamond Bar, La Habra Heights, and 
Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, California. 
‘‘(87) NEW RIVER, CALIFORNIA.—$10,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure to improve water qual-
ity in the New River, California. 
‘‘(88) 
ORANGE
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—
$15,000,000 for wastewater and water related infra-
structure, Anaheim, Brea, La Habra, Mission Viejo, 
Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, Orange 
County, California. 
‘‘(89) 
SAN
BERNARDINO
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—$9,000,000 for wastewater and water re-
lated infrastructure, Chino and Chino Hills, San 
Bernardino County, California. 
‘‘(90) SANTA
CLARA
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—
$5,500,000 for an advanced recycling water treat-
ment plant in Santa Clara County, California. 
‘‘(91) SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—$15,000,000 for environmental infrastruc-
ture for the groundwater basin optimization pipeline, 
Southern Los Angeles County, California. 
‘‘(92) STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.—$33,000,000 
for water treatment and distribution infrastructure, 
Stockton, California.
375
‘‘(93) SWEETWATER
RESERVOIR, SAN
DIEGO 
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—$375,000 to improve water 
quality, and remove nonnative aquatic species from 
the Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, Cali-
fornia. 
‘‘(94) WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA.—$8,000,000 for 
water, wastewater, and water related infrastructure, 
Whittier, California. 
‘‘(95) MONTEZUMA AND LA PLATA COUNTIES, 
COLORADO.—$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
related infrastructure for the Ute Mountain project, 
Montezuma and La Plata Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(96) OTERO, BENT, CROWLEY, KIOWA, AND 
PROWERS COUNTIES, COLORADO.—$35,000,000 for 
water transmission infrastructure, Otero, Bent, 
Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(97) PUEBLO AND OTERO COUNTIES, COLO-
RADO.—$34,000,000 for water transmission infra-
structure, Pueblo and Otero Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(98) 
LEDYARD
AND
MONTVILLE, 
CON-
NECTICUT.—$7,113,000 for water infrastructure, 
Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut. 
‘‘(99) ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUM-
BIA
AND
MARYLAND.—$20,000,000 for environ-
mental infrastructure and resource protection and
376
development to enhance water quality and living re-
sources in the Anacostia River watershed, District of 
Columbia and Maryland. 
‘‘(100) WASHINGTON, DISTRICT
OF
COLUM-
BIA.—$35,000,000 for implementation of a com-
bined sewer overflow long-term control plan, Wash-
ington, District of Columbia. 
‘‘(101) 
CHARLOTTE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$3,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, Char-
lotte County, Florida. 
‘‘(102) CHARLOTTE, LEE, AND COLLIER COUN-
TIES, 
FLORIDA.—$20,000,000 for water supply 
interconnectivity infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and 
Collier Counties, Florida. 
‘‘(103) 
COLLIER
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$5,000,000 for water infrastructure to improve 
water quality in the vicinity of the Gordon River, 
Collier County, Florida. 
‘‘(104) JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA.—$25,000,000 
for wastewater related infrastructure, including sep-
tic tank replacements, Jacksonville, Florida. 
‘‘(105) 
SARASOTA
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
$10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture in Sarasota County, Florida.
377
‘‘(106) SOUTH SEMINOLE AND NORTH ORANGE 
COUNTY, FLORIDA.—$30,000,000 for wastewater in-
frastructure for the South Seminole and North Or-
ange Wastewater Transmission Authority, Florida. 
‘‘(107) 
FAYETTEVILLE, 
GRANTVILLE, 
LA-
GRANGE, 
PINE
MOUNTAIN
(HARRIS
COUNTY), 
DOUGLASVILLE, 
AND
CARROLLTON, 
GEORGIA.—
$24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture, Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Moun-
tain (Harris County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, 
Georgia. 
‘‘(108) MERIWETHER
AND
SPALDING
COUN-
TIES, GEORGIA.—$7,000,000 for water and waste-
water infrastructure, Meriwether and Spalding 
Counties, Georgia. 
‘‘(109) NORTH VERNON AND BUTLERVILLE, IN-
DIANA.—$1,700,000 for wastewater infrastructure, 
North Vernon and Butlerville, Indiana. 
‘‘(110) SALEM, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, INDI-
ANA.—$3,200,000 for water supply infrastructure, 
Salem, Washington County, Indiana. 
‘‘(111) CENTRAL KENTUCKY.—$10,000,000 for 
water related infrastructure and resource protection 
and development, Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Ander-
son, Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln,
378
Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Mont-
gomery, and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky. 
‘‘(112) PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.—$7,000,000 
for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure, 
Plaquemine, Louisiana. 
‘‘(113) 
SHREVEPORT, 
LOUISIANA.—
$20,000,000 for water supply infrastructure in 
Shreveport, Louisiana. 
‘‘(114) 
CENTRAL
IRON
RANGE
SANITARY 
SEWER
DISTRICT, 
MINNESOTA.—$12,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure for the Central Iron 
Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the cities of 
Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan 
and Great Scott Townships, Minnesota. 
‘‘(115) 
GRAND
RAPIDS, 
MINNESOTA.—
$5,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Grand 
Rapids, Minnesota. 
‘‘(116) CITY OF BILOXI, CITY OF GULFPORT, 
AND HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—$15,000,000 
for water and wastewater related infrastructure, city 
of Biloxi, city of Gulfport, and Harrison County, 
Mississippi. 
‘‘(117) JACKSON, 
MISSISSIPPI.—$25,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, 
Mississippi.