H. R. 2084
One Hundred Sixth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE FIRST SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine
An Act
Making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the
following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury
not otherwise appropriated, for the Department of Transportation
and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000,
and for other purposes, namely:
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
For necessary expenses of the Immediate Office of the
Secretary, $1,867,000.
IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SECRETARY
For necessary expenses of the Immediate Office of the Deputy
Secretary, $600,000.
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
For necessary expenses of the Office of the General Counsel,
$9,000,000.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POLICY
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Policy, $2,824,000.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR AVIATION AND
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Aviation and International Affairs, $7,650,000: Provided, That
notwithstanding any other provision of law, there may be credited
to this appropriation up to $1,250,000 in funds received in user
fees.
H. R. 2084—2
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR BUDGET AND PROGRAMS
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Budget and Programs, $6,870,000, including not to exceed
$45,000 for allocation within the Department for official reception
and representation expenses as the Secretary may determine.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Governmental Affairs, $2,039,000.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Administration, $17,767,000.
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
For necessary expenses of the Office of Public Affairs,
$1,800,000.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
For 
necessary 
expenses 
of 
the 
Executive 
Secretariat,
$1,102,000.
BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
For necessary expenses of the Board of Contract Appeals,
$520,000.
OFFICE OF SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION
For necessary expenses of the Office of Small and Disadvan-
taged Business Utilization, $1,222,000.
OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY
For necessary expenses of the Office of Intelligence and Secu-
rity, $1,454,000.
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
For necessary expenses of the Office of the Chief Information
Officer, $5,075,000.
OFFICE OF INTERMODALISM
For necessary expenses of the Office of Intermodalism,
$1,062,000.
OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS
For necessary expenses of the Office of Civil Rights, $7,200,000.
H. R. 2084—3
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT
For necessary expenses for conducting transportation planning,
research, systems development, development activities, and making
grants, to remain available until expended, $3,300,000.
TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE CENTER
Necessary expenses for operating costs and capital outlays of
the Transportation Administrative Service Center, not to exceed
$148,673,000, shall be paid from appropriations made available
to the Department of Transportation: Provided, That the preceding
limitation shall not apply to activities associated with departmental
Year 2000 conversion activities: Provided further, That such services
shall be provided on a competitive basis to entities within the
Department of Transportation: Provided further, That the above
limitation on operating expenses shall not apply to non-DOT enti-
ties: Provided further, That no funds appropriated in this Act to
an agency of the Department shall be transferred to the Transpor-
tation Administrative Service Center without the approval of the
agency modal administrator: Provided further, That no assessments
may be levied against any program, budget activity, subactivity
or project funded by this Act unless notice of such assessments
and the basis therefor are presented to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations and are approved by such Commit-
tees.
MINORITY BUSINESS RESOURCE CENTER PROGRAM
For the cost of direct loans, $1,500,000, as authorized by 49
U.S.C. 332: Provided, That such costs, including the cost of modi-
fying such loans, shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congres-
sional Budget Act of 1974: Provided further, That these funds
are available to subsidize gross obligations for the principal amount
of direct loans not to exceed $13,775,000. In addition, for adminis-
trative expenses to carry out the direct loan program, $400,000.
MINORITY BUSINESS OUTREACH
For necessary expenses of Minority Business Resource Center
outreach activities, $2,900,000, of which $2,635,000 shall remain
available until September 30, 2001: Provided, That notwithstanding
49 U.S.C. 332, these funds may be used for business opportunities
related to any mode of transportation.
COAST GUARD
OPERATING EXPENSES
For necessary expenses for the operation and maintenance of
the Coast Guard, not otherwise provided for; purchase of not to
exceed five passenger motor vehicles for replacement only; payments
pursuant to section 156 of Public Law 97–377, as amended (42
U.S.C. 402 note), and section 229(b) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 429(b)); and recreation and welfare; $2,781,000,000, of
which $300,000,000 shall be available for defense-related activities;
and of which $25,000,000 shall be derived from the Oil Spill
Liability Trust Fund: Provided, That none of the funds appropriated
H. R. 2084—4
in this or any other Act shall be available for pay for administrative
expenses in connection with shipping commissioners in the United
States: Provided further, That none of the funds provided in this
Act shall be available for expenses incurred for yacht documentation
under 46 U.S.C. 12109, except to the extent fees are collected
from yacht owners and credited to this appropriation: Provided
further, That the Commandant shall reduce both military and
civilian employment levels for the purpose of complying with Execu-
tive Order No. 12839: Provided further, That up to $615,000 in
user fees collected pursuant to section 1111 of Public Law 104–
324 shall be credited to this appropriation as offsetting collections
in fiscal year 2000: Provided further, That notwithstanding any
other provision of law, the Commandant of the Coast Guard may
transfer certain parcels of real property located at Sitka, Japonski
Island, Alaska to the State of Alaska for the purpose of airport
expansion, provided that the Commandant determines that the
Coast Guard has been indemnified for any loss, damage, or destruc-
tion of any structures or other improvements on the lands to be
conveyed. No other provision of law shall otherwise make the real
property improvements on Japonski Island ineligible for Federal
funding by virtue of any consideration received by the Coast Guard
for such improvements: Provided further, That none of the funds
in this Act shall be available for the Coast Guard to plan, finalize,
or implement any regulation that would promulgate new maritime
user fees not specifically authorized by law after the date of the
enactment of this Act: Provided further, That the Secretary of
Transportation may use any surplus funds that are made available
to the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, for drug
interdiction activities of the Coast Guard.
ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS
For necessary expenses of acquisition, construction, renovation,
and improvement of aids to navigation, shore facilities, vessels,
and aircraft, including equipment related thereto, $389,326,000,
of which $20,000,000 shall be derived from the Oil Spill Liability
Trust Fund; of which $134,560,000 shall be available to acquire,
repair, renovate or improve vessels, small boats and related equip-
ment, to remain available until September 30, 2004; $44,210,000
shall be available to acquire new aircraft and increase aviation
capability, to remain available until September 30, 2002;
$51,626,000 shall be available for other equipment, to remain avail-
able until September 30, 2002; $63,800,000 shall be available for
shore facilities and aids to navigation facilities, to remain available
until September 30, 2002; $50,930,000 shall be available for per-
sonnel compensation and benefits and related costs, to remain avail-
able until September 30, 2001; and $44,200,000 for the Integrated
Deepwater Systems program, to remain available until September
30, 2002: Provided, That the Commandant of the Coast Guard
is authorized to dispose of, by sale at fair market value, all rights,
title, and interest of any United States entity on behalf of the
Coast Guard in HU–25 aircraft and Coast Guard property, and
improvements 
thereto, 
in 
South 
Haven, 
Michigan; 
ESMT
Manasquan, New Jersey; Petaluma, California; ESMT Portsmouth,
New Hampshire; Station Clair Flats, Michigan; and Aids to Naviga-
tion Team Huron, Ohio: Provided further, That all proceeds from
the sale of properties listed under this heading, and from the
H. R. 2084—5
sale of HU–25 aircraft, shall be credited to this appropriation as
offsetting collections and made available only for the Integrated
Deepwater Systems program, to remain available for obligation
until September 30, 2002: Provided further, That obligations made
pursuant to the provisions of this Act for the Integrated Deepwater
Systems program may not exceed $50,000,000 during fiscal year
2000: Provided further, That upon initial submission to the Congress
of the fiscal year 2001 President’s budget, the Secretary of Transpor-
tation shall transmit to the Congress a comprehensive capital
investment plan for the United States Coast Guard which includes
funding for each budget line item for fiscal years 2001 through
2005, with total funding for each year of the plan constrained
to the funding targets for those years as estimated and approved
by the Office of Management and Budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION
For necessary expenses to carry out the Coast Guard’s environ-
mental compliance and restoration functions under chapter 19 of
title 14, United States Code, $17,000,000, to remain available until
expended.
ALTERATION OF BRIDGES
For necessary expenses for alteration or removal of obstructive
bridges, $15,000,000, to remain available until expended.
RETIRED PAY
For retired pay, including the payment of obligations therefor
otherwise chargeable to lapsed appropriations for this purpose,
and payments under the Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection
and Survivor Benefits Plans, and for payments for medical care
of retired personnel and their dependents under the Dependents
Medical Care Act (10 U.S.C. ch. 55), $730,327,000.
RESERVE TRAINING
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
For all necessary expenses of the Coast Guard Reserve, as
authorized by law; maintenance and operation of facilities; and
supplies, equipment, and services; $72,000,000: Provided, That no
more than $21,500,000 of funds made available under this heading
may be transferred to Coast Guard ‘‘Operating expenses’’ or other-
wise made available to reimburse the Coast Guard for financial
support of the Coast Guard Reserve: Provided further, That none
of the funds in this Act may be used by the Coast Guard to
assess direct charges on the Coast Guard Reserves for items or
activities which were not so charged during fiscal year 1997.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
For necessary expenses, not otherwise provided for, for applied
scientific research, development, test, and evaluation; maintenance,
rehabilitation, lease and operation of facilities and equipment, as
authorized by law, $19,000,000, to remain available until expended,
of which $3,500,000 shall be derived from the Oil Spill Liability
Trust Fund: Provided, That there may be credited to and used
H. R. 2084—6
for the purposes of this appropriation funds received from State
and local governments, other public authorities, private sources,
and foreign countries, for expenses incurred for research, develop-
ment, testing, and evaluation.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
OPERATIONS
(AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND)
For necessary expenses of the Federal Aviation Administration,
not otherwise provided for, including operations and research activi-
ties related to commercial space transportation, administrative
expenses for research and development, establishment of air naviga-
tion facilities, the operation (including leasing) and maintenance
of aircraft, subsidizing the cost of aeronautical charts and maps
sold to the public, and carrying out the provisions of subchapter
I of chapter 471 of title 49, United States Code, or other provisions
of law authorizing the obligation of funds for similar programs
of airport and airway development or improvement, lease or pur-
chase of passenger motor vehicles for replacement only, in addition
to amounts made available by Public Law 104–264, $5,900,000,000
from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund: Provided, That none
of the funds in this Act shall be available for the Federal Aviation
Administration to plan, finalize, or implement any regulation that
would promulgate new aviation user fees not specifically authorized
by law after the date of the enactment of this Act: Provided further,
That there may be credited to this appropriation funds received
from States, counties, municipalities, foreign authorities, other
public authorities, and private sources, for expenses incurred in
the provision of agency services, including receipts for the mainte-
nance and operation of air navigation facilities, and for issuance,
renewal or modification of certificates, including airman, aircraft,
and repair station certificates, or for tests related thereto, or for
processing major repair or alteration forms: Provided further, That
of the funds appropriated under this heading, $5,000,000 shall
be for the contract tower cost-sharing program and $600,000 shall
be for the Centennial of Flight Commission: Provided further, That
funds may be used to enter into a grant agreement with a nonprofit
standard-setting organization to assist in the development of avia-
tion safety standards: Provided further, That none of the funds
in this Act shall be available for new applicants for the second
career training program: Provided further, That none of the funds
in this Act shall be available for paying premium pay under 5
U.S.C. 5546(a) to any Federal Aviation Administration employee
unless such employee actually performed work during the time
corresponding to such premium pay: Provided further, That none
of the funds in this Act may be obligated or expended to operate
a manned auxiliary flight service station in the contiguous United
States: Provided further, That none of the funds in this Act may
be used for the Federal Aviation Administration to enter into a
multiyear lease greater than 5 years in length or greater than
$100,000,000 in value unless such lease is specifically authorized
by the Congress and appropriations have been provided to fully
cover the Federal Government’s contingent liabilities: Provided fur-
ther, That no more than $24,162,700 of funds appropriated to the
H. R. 2084—7
Federal Aviation Administration in this Act may be used for activi-
ties conducted by, or coordinated through, the Transportation
Administrative Service Center: Provided further, That none of the
funds in this Act for aeronautical charting and cartography are
available for activities conducted by, or coordinated through, the
Transportation Administrative Service Center: Provided further,
That none of the funds in this Act may be used for the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) to sign a lease for satellite services
related to the global positioning system (GPS) wide area augmenta-
tion system until the administrator of FAA certifies in writing
to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations that FAA
has conducted a lease versus buy analysis which indicates that
such lease will result in the lowest overall cost to the agency.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
(AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND)
For necessary expenses, not otherwise provided for, for acquisi-
tion, establishment, and improvement by contract or purchase, and
hire of air navigation and experimental facilities and equipment
as authorized under part A of subtitle VII of title 49, United
States Code, including initial acquisition of necessary sites by lease
or grant; engineering and service testing, including construction
of test facilities and acquisition of necessary sites by lease or grant;
and construction and furnishing of quarters and related accommoda-
tions for officers and employees of the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion stationed at remote localities where such accommodations are
not available; and the purchase, lease, or transfer of aircraft from
funds available under this head; to be derived from the Airport
and Airway Trust Fund, $2,075,000,000, of which $1,780,000,000
shall remain available until September 30, 2002, and of which
$295,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2000: Pro-
vided, That there may be credited to this appropriation funds
received from States, counties, municipalities, other public authori-
ties, and private sources, for expenses incurred in the establishment
and modernization of air navigation facilities: Provided further,
That upon initial submission to the Congress of the fiscal year
2001 President’s budget, the Secretary of Transportation shall
transmit to the Congress a comprehensive capital investment plan
for the Federal Aviation Administration which includes funding
for each budget line item for fiscal years 2001 through 2005, with
total funding for each year of the plan constrained to the funding
targets for those years as estimated and approved by the Office
of Management and Budget: Provided further, That none of the
funds in this Act may be used for the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion to enter into a capital lease agreement unless appropriations
have been provided to fully cover the Federal Government’s contin-
gent liabilities at the time the lease agreement is signed.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
(AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND)
(RESCISSION)
Of the amount provided under this heading in Public Law
105–66, $30,000,000 are rescinded.
H. R. 2084—8
RESEARCH, ENGINEERING, AND DEVELOPMENT
(AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND)
For necessary expenses, not otherwise provided for, for
research, engineering, and development, as authorized under part
A of subtitle VII of title 49, United States Code, including construc-
tion of experimental facilities and acquisition of necessary sites
by lease or grant, $156,495,000, to be derived from the Airport
and Airway Trust Fund and to remain available until September
30, 2002: Provided, That there may be credited to this appropriation
funds received from States, counties, municipalities, other public
authorities, and private sources, for expenses incurred for research,
engineering, and development.
GRANTS-IN-AID FOR AIRPORTS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND)
For liquidation of obligations incurred for grants-in-aid for air-
port planning and development, and noise compatibility planning
and programs as authorized under subchapter I of chapter 471
and subchapter I of chapter 475 of title 49, United States Code,
and under other law authorizing such obligations; for administration
of such programs; for administration of programs under section
40117; and for inspection activities and administration of airport
safety programs, including those related to airport operating certifi-
cates under section 44706 of title 49, United States Code,
$1,750,000,000, to be derived from the Airport and Airway Trust
Fund and to remain available until expended: Provided, That none
of the funds under this heading shall be available for the planning
or execution of programs the obligations for which are in excess
of $1,950,000,000 in fiscal year 2000, notwithstanding section
47117(h) of title 49, United States Code: Provided further, That
notwithstanding any other provision of law, not more than
$45,000,000 of funds limited under this heading shall be obligated
for administration: Provided further, That, notwithstanding any
other provision of law, in the event of a lapse in authorization
of the grants program under this heading, funding available under
Federal Aviation Administration, ‘‘Operations’’ may be obligated
for administration during the time period of the lapse in authoriza-
tion, at the rate corresponding to the maximum annual obligation
level of $45,000,000: Provided further, That total obligations from
all sources in fiscal year 2000 for administration may not exceed
$45,000,000.
AVIATION INSURANCE REVOLVING FUND
The Secretary of Transportation is hereby authorized to make
such expenditures and investments, within the limits of funds avail-
able pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 44307, and in accordance with section
104 of the Government Corporation Control Act, as amended (31
U.S.C. 9104), as may be necessary in carrying out the program
for aviation insurance activities under chapter 443 of title 49,
United States Code.
H. R. 2084—9
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Necessary expenses for administration and operation of the
Federal Highway Administration not to exceed $376,072,000 shall
be paid in accordance with law from appropriations made available
by this Act to the Federal Highway Administration together with
advances and reimbursements received by the Federal Highway
Administration: Provided, That $70,484,000 shall be available to
carry out the functions and operations of the Office of Motor Car-
riers: Provided further, That of the funds available under section
104(a) of title 23, United States Code: $6,000,000 shall be available
for Commercial Remote Sensing Products and Spatial Information
Technologies under section 5113 of Public Law 105–178, as
amended; $5,000,000 shall be available for Nationwide Differential
Global Positioning System program, as authorized; $8,000,000 shall
be available for National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Pro-
gram under section 1224 of Public Law 105–178, as amended;
$15,000,000 shall be available to the University of Alabama in
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, for research activities at the Transportation
Research Institute and to construct a building to house the Institute,
and shall remain available until expended; $18,300,000 shall be
available for the Indian Reservation Roads Program under section
204 of title 23, United States Code; $16,400,000 shall be available
for the Public Lands Highways Program under section 204 of title
23, United States Code; $11,000,000 shall be available for the
Park Roads and Parkways Program under section 204 of title 23,
United States Code; $1,300,000 shall be available for the Refuge
Road Program under section 204 of title 23, United States Code;
$10,000,000 shall be available for the Transportation and Commu-
nity and System Preservation pilot program under section 1221
of Public Law 105–178; and $7,500,000 shall be available for ‘‘Child
Passenger Protection Education Grants’’ under section 2003(b) of
Public Law 105–178, as amended.
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
(LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
None of the funds in this Act shall be available for the
implementation or execution of programs, the obligations for which
are in excess of $27,701,350,000 for Federal-aid highways and high-
way safety construction programs for fiscal year 2000: Provided,
That within the $27,701,350,000 obligation limitation on Federal-
aid highways and highway safety construction programs, not more
than $391,450,000 shall be available for the implementation or
execution of programs for transportation research (sections 502,
503, 504, 506, 507, and 508 of title 23, United States Code, as
amended; section 5505 of title 49, United States Code, as amended;
and sections 5112 and 5204–5209 of Public Law 105–178) for fiscal
year 2000; not more than $20,000,000 shall be available for the
implementation or execution of programs for the Magnetic Levita-
tion Transportation Technology Deployment Program (section 1218
of Public Law 105–178) for fiscal year 2000, of which not to exceed
$1,000,000 shall be available to the Federal Railroad Administration
H. R. 2084—10
for administrative expenses and technical assistance in connection
with such program; not more than $31,000,000 shall be available
for the implementation or execution of programs for the Bureau
of Transportation Statistics (section 111 of title 49, United States
Code) for fiscal year 2000: Provided further, That within the
$211,200,000 obligation limitation on Intelligent Transportation
Systems, the following sums shall be made available for Intelligent
Transportation System projects in the following specified areas:
Albuquerque, New Mexico, $2,000,000;
Arapahoe County, Colorado, $1,000,000;
Branson, Missouri, $1,000,000;
Central Pennsylvania, $1,000,000;
Charlotte, North Carolina, $1,000,000;
Chicago, Illinois, $1,000,000;
City 
of 
Superior 
and 
Douglas 
County, 
Wisconsin,
$1,000,000;
Clay County, Missouri, $300,000;
Clearwater, Florida, $3,500,000;
College Station, Texas, $1,000,000;
Central Ohio, $1,000,000;
Commonwealth of Virginia, $4,000,000;
Corpus Christi, Texas, $1,500,000;
Delaware River, Pennsylvania, $1,000,000;
Fairfield, California, $750,000;
Fargo, North Dakota, $1,000,000;
Florida Bay County, Florida, $1,000,000;
Fort Worth, Texas, $2,500,000;
Grand Forks, North Dakota, $500,000;
Greater Metropolitan Capital Region, District of Columbia,
$5,000,000;
Greater Yellowstone, Montana, $1,000,000;
Houma, Louisiana, $1,000,000;
Houston, Texas, $1,500,000;
Huntsville, Alabama, $500,000;
Inglewood, California, $1,000,000;
Jefferson County, Colorado, $1,500,000;
Kansas City, Missouri, $1,000,000;
Las Vegas, Nevada, $2,800,000;
Los Angeles, California, $1,000,000;
Miami, Florida, $1,000,000;
Mission Viejo, California, $1,000,000;
Monroe County, New York, $1,000,000;
Nashville, Tennessee, $1,000,000;
Northeast Florida, $1,000,000;
Oakland, California, $500,000;
Oakland County, Michigan, $1,000,000;
Oxford, Mississippi, $1,500,000;
Pennsylvania Turnpike, Pennsylvania, $2,500,000;
Pueblo, Colorado, $1,000,000;
Puget Sound, Washington, $1,000,000;
Reno/Tahoe, California/Nevada, $500,000;
Rensselaer County, New York, $1,000,000;
Sacramento County, California, $1,000,000;
Salt Lake City, Utah, $3,000,000;
San Francisco, California, $1,000,000;
Santa Clara, California, $1,000,000;
Santa Teresa, New Mexico, $1,000,000;
H. R. 2084—11
Seattle, Washington, $2,100,000;
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, $2,500,000;
Shreveport, Louisiana, $1,000,000;
Silicon Valley, California, $1,000,000;
Southeast Michigan, $2,000,000;
Spokane, Washington, $500,000;
St. Louis, Missouri, $1,000,000;
State of Alabama, $1,300,000;
State of Alaska, $3,000,000;
State of Arizona, $1,000,000;
State of Colorado, $1,500,000;
State of Delaware, $2,000,000;
State of Idaho, $2,000,000;
State of Illinois, $1,500,000;
State of Maryland, $2,000,000;
State of Minnesota, $7,000,000;
State of Montana, $1,000,000;
State of Nebraska, $500,000;
State of Oregon, $1,000,000;
State of Texas, $4,000,000;
State of Vermont rural systems, $1,000,000;
States of New Jersey and New York, $2,000,000;
Statewide Transcom/Transmit upgrades, New Jersey,
$4,000,000;
Tacoma Puyallup, Washington, $500,000;
Thurston, Washington, $1,000,000;
Towamencin, Pennsylvania, $600,000;
Wausau-Stevens 
Point-Wisconsin 
Rapids, 
Wisconsin,
$1,500,000;
Wayne County, Michigan, $1,000,000:
Provided further, That, notwithstanding Public Law 105–178 as
amended, funds authorized under section 110 of title 23, United
States Code, for fiscal year 2000 shall be apportioned based on
each State’s percentage share of funding provided for under section
105 of title 23, United States Code, for fiscal year 2000, except
that before such apportionments are made, $90,000,000 shall be
set aside for projects authorized under section 1602 of Public Law
105–178 as amended, and $8,000,000 shall be set aside for the
Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge project authorized by section
404 of the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge Authority Act of
1995 as amended. Of the funds to be apportioned under section
110 for fiscal year 2000, the Secretary shall ensure that such
funds are apportioned for the Interstate Maintenance program,
the National Highway system program, the bridge program, the
surface transportation program, and the congestion mitigation and
air quality program in the same ratio that each State is apportioned
funds for such program in fiscal year 2000 but for this section:
Provided further, That, notwithstanding any other provision of law,
the Secretary shall, at the request of the State of Nevada, transfer
up to $10,000,000 of Minimum Guarantee apportionments, and
an equal amount of obligation authority, to the State of California
for use on High Priority Project No. 829 ‘‘Widen I–15 in San
Bernardino County’’, section 1602 of Public Law 105–178.
H. R. 2084—12
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
For carrying out the provisions of title 23, United States Code,
that are attributable to Federal-aid highways, including the
National Scenic and Recreational Highway as authorized by 23
U.S.C. 148, not otherwise provided, including reimbursement for
sums expended pursuant to the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 308,
$26,000,000,000 or so much thereof as may be available in and
derived from the Highway Trust Fund, to remain available until
expended.
MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY GRANTS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
For payment of obligations incurred in carrying out 49 U.S.C.
31102, $105,000,000, to be derived from the Highway Trust Fund
and to remain available until expended: Provided, That none of
the funds in this Act shall be available for the implementation
or execution of programs the obligations for which are in excess
of $105,000,000 for ‘‘Motor Carrier Safety Grants’’.
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH
For expenses necessary to discharge the functions of the Sec-
retary, with respect to traffic and highway safety under chapter
301 of title 49, United States Code, and part C of subtitle VI
of title 49, United States Code, $87,400,000 of which $62,928,000
shall remain available until September 30, 2002: Provided, That
none of the funds appropriated by this Act may be obligated or
expended to plan, finalize, or implement any rulemaking to add
to section 575.104 of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations
any requirement pertaining to a grading standard that is different
from the three grading standards (treadwear, traction, and tempera-
ture resistance) already in effect.
OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
For payment of obligations incurred in carrying out the provi-
sions of 23 U.S.C. 403, to remain available until expended,
$72,000,000, to be derived from the Highway Trust Fund: Provided,
That none of the funds in this Act shall be available for the
planning or execution of programs the total obligations for which,
in fiscal year 2000 are in excess of $72,000,000 for programs author-
ized under 23 U.S.C. 403.
H. R. 2084—13
NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
For expenses necessary to discharge the functions of the Sec-
retary with respect to the National Driver Register under chapter
303 of title 49, United States Code, $2,000,000, to be derived from
the Highway Trust Fund and to remain available until expended.
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANTS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for payment of
obligations incurred in carrying out the provisions of 23 U.S.C.
402, 405, 410, and 411 to remain available until expended,
$206,800,000, to be derived from the Highway Trust Fund: Provided,
That none of the funds in this Act shall be available for the
planning or execution of programs the total obligations for which,
in fiscal year 2000, are in excess of $206,800,000 for programs
authorized under 23 U.S.C. 402, 405, 410, and 411 of which
$152,800,000 shall be for ‘‘Highway Safety Programs’’ under 23
U.S.C. 402, $10,000,000 shall be for ‘‘Occupant Protection Incentive
Grants’’ under 23 U.S.C. 405, $36,000,000 shall be for ‘‘Alcohol-
Impaired Driving Countermeasures Grants’’ under 23 U.S.C. 410,
$8,000,000 shall be for the ‘‘State Highway Safety Data Grants’’
under 23 U.S.C. 411: Provided further, That none of these funds
shall be used for construction, rehabilitation, or remodeling costs,
or for office furnishings and fixtures for State, local, or private
buildings or structures: Provided further, That not to exceed
$7,640,000 of the funds made available for section 402, not to
exceed $500,000 of the funds made available for section 405, not
to exceed $1,800,000 of the funds made available for section 410,
and not to exceed $400,000 of the funds made available for section
411 shall be available to NHTSA for administering highway safety
grants under chapter 4 of title 23, United States Code: Provided
further, That not to exceed $500,000 of the funds made available
for section 410 ‘‘Alcohol-Impaired Driving Countermeasures Grants’’
shall be available for technical assistance to the States.
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION
SAFETY AND OPERATIONS
For necessary expenses of the Federal Railroad Administration,
not otherwise provided for, $94,288,000, of which $6,800,000 shall
remain available until expended: Provided, That, as part of the
Washington Union Station transaction in which the Secretary
assumed the first deed of trust on the property and, where the
Union Station Redevelopment Corporation or any successor is obli-
gated to make payments on such deed of trust on the Secretary’s
behalf, including payments on and after September 30, 1988, the
Secretary is authorized to receive such payments directly from
the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation, credit them to the
H. R. 2084—14
appropriation charged for the first deed of trust, and make pay-
ments on the first deed of trust with those funds: Provided further,
That such additional sums as may be necessary for payment on
the first deed of trust may be advanced by the Administrator
from unobligated balances available to the Federal Railroad
Administration, to be reimbursed from payments received from
the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation.
RAILROAD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
For necessary expenses for railroad research and development,
$22,464,000, to remain available until expended.
RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to issue to the
Secretary of the Treasury notes or other obligations pursuant to
section 512 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform
Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–210), as amended, in such amounts
and at such times as may be necessary to pay any amounts required
pursuant to the guarantee of the principal amount of obligations
under sections 511 through 513 of such Act, such authority to
exist as long as any such guaranteed obligation is outstanding:
Provided, That pursuant to section 502 of such Act, as amended,
no new direct loans or loan guarantee commitments shall be made
using Federal funds for the credit risk premium during fiscal year
2000.
NEXT GENERATION HIGH-SPEED RAIL
For necessary expenses for the Next Generation High-Speed
Rail program as authorized under 49 U.S.C. 26101 and 26102,
$27,200,000, to remain available until expended.
ALASKA RAILROAD REHABILITATION
To enable the Secretary of Transportation to make grants to
the Alaska Railroad, $10,000,000 shall be for capital rehabilitation
and improvements benefiting its passenger operations, to remain
available until expended.
RHODE ISLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT
For the costs associated with construction of a third track
on the Northeast Corridor between Davisville and Central Falls,
Rhode Island, with sufficient clearance to accommodate double stack
freight cars, $10,000,000 to be matched by the State of Rhode
Island or its designee on a dollar-for-dollar basis and to remain
available until expended: Provided, That none of the funds made
available under this head shall be obligated until the enactment
of authorizing legislation for the ‘‘Rhode Island Rail Development’’
program.
CAPITAL GRANTS TO THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION
For necessary expenses of capital improvements of the National
Railroad Passenger Corporation as authorized by 49 U.S.C.
H. R. 2084—15
24104(a), $571,000,000 to remain available until expended: Pro-
vided, That the Secretary shall not obligate more than $228,400,000
prior to September 30, 2000.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
For necessary administrative expenses of the Federal Transit
Administration’s programs authorized by chapter 53 of title 49,
United States Code, $12,000,000: Provided, That no more than
$60,000,000 of budget authority shall be available for these pur-
poses: Provided further, That the Federal Transit Administration
will reimburse the Department of Transportation Inspector General
$1,500,000 for costs associated with the audit and review of new
fixed guideway systems.
FORMULA GRANTS
For necessary expenses to carry out 49 U.S.C. 5307, 5308,
5310, 5311, 5327, and section 3038 of Public Law 105–178,
$619,600,000, to remain available until expended: Provided, That
no more than $3,098,000,000 of budget authority shall be available
for these purposes: Provided further, That notwithstanding section
3008 of Public Law 105–178, the $50,000,000 to carry out 49 U.S.C.
5308 shall be transferred to and merged with funding provided
for the replacement, rehabilitation, and purchase of buses and
related equipment and the construction of bus-related facilities
under ‘‘Federal Transit Administration, Capital investment grants’’.
UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH
For necessary expenses to carry out 49 U.S.C. 5505, $1,200,000,
to remain available until expended: Provided, That no more than
$6,000,000 of budget authority shall be available for these purposes.
TRANSIT PLANNING AND RESEARCH
For necessary expenses to carry out 49 U.S.C. 5303, 5304,
5305, 5311(b)(2), 5312, 5313(a), 5314, 5315, and 5322, $21,000,000,
to remain available until expended: Provided, That no more than
$107,000,000 of budget authority shall be available for these pur-
poses: Provided further, That $5,250,000 is available to provide
rural transportation assistance (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)); $4,000,000
is available to carry out programs under the National Transit
Institute (49 U.S.C. 5315); $8,250,000 is available to carry out
transit 
cooperative 
research 
programs 
(49 
U.S.C. 
5313(a));
$49,632,000 is available for metropolitan planning (49 U.S.C. 5303,
5304, and 5305); $10,368,000 is available for State planning (49
U.S.C. 5313(b)); and $29,500,000 is available for the national plan-
ning and research program (49 U.S.C. 5314): Provided further,
That of the total budget authority made available for the national
planning and research program, the Federal Transit Administration
shall provide the following amounts for the projects and activities
listed below:
Zinc-air battery bus technology demonstration, $1,000,000;
Electric vehicle information sharing and technology
transfer program, $750,000;
H. R. 2084—16
Portland, Maine independent transportation network,
$500,000;
Wheeling, West Virginia mobility study, $250,000;
Project ACTION, $3,000,000;
Washoe County, Nevada transit technology, $1,250,000;
Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority advanced electric
transit buses and related infrastructure, $1,500,000;
Palm Springs, California fuel cell buses, $1,000,000;
Gloucester, Massachusetts intermodal technology center,
$1,500,000;
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority advanced
propulsion control system, $3,000,000;
Advanced transportation and alternative fuel technology
consortium (CALSTART), $3,250,000;
Safety and security programs, $5,450,000;
International program, $1,000,000;
Santa Barbara Electric Transit Institute, $500,000;
Hennepin County community transportation, Minnesota,
$1,000,000;
Pittsfield economic development authority electric bus pro-
gram, $1,350,000; and
Citizens for Modern Transit, Missouri, $300,000.
TRUST FUND SHARE OF EXPENSES
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for payment of
obligations incurred in carrying out 49 U.S.C. 5303–5308, 5310–
5315, 5317(b), 5322, 5327, 5334, 5505, and sections 3037 and 3038
of Public Law 105–178, $4,929,270,000, to remain available until
expended, and to be derived from the Mass Transit Account of
the Highway Trust Fund: Provided, That $2,478,400,000 shall be
paid to the Federal Transit Administration’s formula grants
account: Provided further, That $86,000,000 shall be paid to the
Federal Transit Administration’s transit planning and research
account: Provided further, That $48,000,000 shall be paid to the
Federal Transit Administration’s administrative expenses account:
Provided further, That $4,800,000 shall be paid to the Federal
Transit 
Administration’s 
university 
transportation 
research
account: Provided further, That $60,000,000 shall be paid to the
Federal Transit Administration’s job access and reverse commute
grants program: Provided further, That $1,960,800,000 shall be
paid to the Federal Transit Administration’s capital investment
grants account.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
For necessary expenses to carry out 49 U.S.C. 5308, 5309,
5318, and 5327, $490,200,000, to remain available until expended:
Provided, That no more than $2,451,000,000 of budget authority
shall be available for these purposes: Provided further, That not-
withstanding any other provision of law, there shall be available
for fixed guideway modernization, $980,400,000; there shall be
H. R. 2084—17
available for the replacement, rehabilitation, and purchase of buses
and related equipment and the construction of bus-related facilities,
$490,200,000, together with $50,000,000 transferred from ‘‘Federal
Transit Administration, Formula grants’’, to be available for the
following projects in amounts specified below:
No.
State
Project
Conference
Alaska .....................
Anchorage 
Ship 
Creek 
intermodal
facility ...................................................
$4,500,000
Alaska .....................
Fairbanks intermodal rail/bus transfer
facility ...................................................
2,000,000
Alaska .....................
Juneau downtown mass transit facility
1,500,000
Alaska .....................
North Star Borough-Fairbanks inter-
modal facility .......................................
3,000,000
Alaska .....................
Wasilla intermodal facility .....................
1,000,000
Alaska .....................
Whittier intermodal facility and pedes-
trian overpass ......................................
1,155,000
Alabama ..................
Alabama statewide rural bus needs ......
2,500,000
Alabama ..................
Baldwin Rural Area Transportation
System buses .......................................
1,000,000
Alabama ..................
Birmingham intermodal facility ............
2,000,000
Alabama ..................
Birmingham-Jefferson County buses ....
1,250,000
Alabama ..................
Cullman, buses ........................................
500,000
Alabama ..................
Dothan Wiregrass Transit Authority
vehicles and transit facility ................
1,000,000
Alabama ..................
Escambia County buses and bus facility
100,000
Alabama ..................
Gees Bend Ferry facilities, Wilcox
County ..................................................
100,000
Alabama ..................
Marshall County, buses ..........................
500,000
Alabama ..................
Huntsville Airport international inter-
modal center ........................................
3,500,000
Alabama ..................
Huntsville, intermodal facility ...............
1,250,000
Alabama ..................
Huntsville Space and Rocket Center
intermodal center ................................
3,500,000
Alabama ..................
Jasper buses ............................................
50,000
Alabama ..................
Jefferson State Community College/
University of Montevallo pedestrian
walkway ...............................................
200,000
Alabama ..................
Mobile waterfront terminal complex .....
5,000,000
Alabama ..................
Montgomery Union Station intermodal
center and buses ..................................
3,500,000
Alabama ..................
Valley bus and bus facilities ..................
110,000
Arkansas .................
Arkansas Highway and Transit Depart-
ment buses ...........................................
2,000,000
Arkansas .................
Arkansas state safety and preventative
maintenance facility ............................
800,000
Arkansas .................
Fayetteville, University of Arkansas
Transit System buses ..........................
500,000
Arkansas .................
Hot Springs, transportation depot and
plaza .....................................................
1,560,000
Arkansas .................
Little Rock, Central Arkansas Transit
buses .....................................................
300,000
Arizona ....................
Phoenix bus and bus facilities ...............
3,750,000
Arizona ....................
Phoenix South Central Avenue transit
facility ...................................................
500,000
Arizona ....................
San Luis, bus ...........................................
70,000
Arizona ....................
Tucson buses ...........................................
2,555,000
Arizona ....................
Yuma paratransit buses .........................
125,000
California ................
California 
Mountain 
Area 
Regional
Transit Authority fueling stations .....
80,000
California ................
Culver City, CityBus buses ....................
1,250,000
H. R. 2084—18
No.
State
Project
Conference
California ................
Davis, Unitrans transit maintenance
facility ...................................................
625,000
California ................
Healdsburg, intermodal facility .............
1,000,000
California ................
I–5 Corridor intermodal transit centers
1,250,000
California ................
Livermore automatic vehicle locator
program ................................................
1,000,000
California ................
Lodi, multimodal facility ........................
850,000
California ................
Los 
Angeles 
County 
Metropolitan
transportation authority buses ...........
3,000,000
California ................
Los Angeles County Foothill Transit
buses and HEV vehicles ......................
1,750,000
California ................
Los Angeles Municipal Transit Opera-
tors Coalition .......................................
2,250,000
California ................
Los Angeles, Union Station Gateway
Intermodal Transit Center .................
1,250,000
California ................
Maywood, Commerce, Bell, Cudahy,
California buses and bus facilities .....
800,000
California ................
Modesto, bus maintenance facility ........
625,000
California ................
Monterey, Monterey-Salinas buses ........
625,000
California ................
Orange County, bus and bus facilities ..
2,000,000
California ................
Perris bus maintenance facility .............
1,250,000
California ................
Redlands, trolley project .........................
800,000
California ................
Sacramento CNG buses ..........................
1,250,000
California ................
San Bernardino Valley, CNG buses ......
1,000,000
California ................
San Bernardino train station .................
3,000,000
California ................
San Diego North County buses and
CNG fueling station ............................
3,000,000
California ................
Contra Costa County Connection buses
250,000
California ................
San Francisco, Islais Creek main-
tenance facility ....................................
1,250,000
California ................
Santa Barbara buses and bus facility ...
1,750,000
California ................
Santa Clarita bus maintenance facility
1,250,000
California ................
Santa Cruz buses and bus facilities ......
1,755,000
California ................
Santa 
Maria 
Valley/Santa 
Barbara
County, buses ......................................
240,000
California ................
Santa Rosa/Cotati, Intermodal Trans-
portation Facilities ..............................
750,000
California ................
Westminster senior citizen vans ............
150,000
California ................
Windsor, Intermodal Facility .................
750,000
California ................
Woodland Hills, Warner Center Trans-
portation Hub ......................................
625,000
Colorado ..................
Boulder/Denver, RTD buses ...................
625,000
Colorado ..................
Colorado 
Association 
of 
Transit
Agencies ...............................................
8,000,000
Colorado ..................
Denver, Stapleton Intermodal Center ...
1,250,000
Connecticut .............
New Haven bus facility ..........................
2,250,000
Connecticut .............
Norwich buses .........................................
2,250,000
Connecticut .............
Waterbury, bus facility ...........................
2,250,000
Dist. of Columbia ...
Fuel cell bus and bus facilities pro-
gram, Georgetown University ............
4,850,000
Dist. of Columbia ...
Washington, D.C. Intermodal Transpor-
tation Center, District .........................
2,500,000
Delaware .................
New Castle County buses and bus
facilities ................................................
2,000,000
Delaware .................
Delaware buses and bus facility ............
500,000
Florida .....................
Daytona Beach, Intermodal Center .......
2,500,000
Florida .....................
Gainesville hybrid-electric buses and
facilities ................................................
500,000
Florida .....................
Jacksonville buses and bus facilities .....
1,000,000
Florida .....................
Lakeland, Citrus Connection transit
vehicles and related equipment .........
1,250,000
Florida .....................
Miami Beach, electric shuttle service ....
750,000
H. R. 2084—19
No.
State
Project
Conference
Florida .....................
Miami-Dade Transit buses .....................
2,750,000
Florida .....................
Orlando, Lynx buses and bus facilities
2,000,000
Florida .....................
Orlando, Downtown Intermodal Facility
2,500,000
Florida .....................
Palm Beach, buses ..................................
1,000,000
Florida .....................
Tampa HARTline buses ..........................
500,000
Georgia ....................
Atlanta, MARTA buses ...........................
13,500,000
Georgia ....................
Chatham Area Transit Bus Transfer
Center and buses .................................
3,500,000
Georgia ....................
Georgia 
Regional 
Transportation
Authority buses ...................................
2,000,000
Georgia ....................
Georgia 
statewide 
buses 
and 
bus-
related facilities ...................................
2,750,000
Hawaii .....................
Hawaii buses and bus facilities .............
2,250,000
Hawaii .....................
Honolulu, bus facility and buses ............
2,000,000
Iowa .........................
Ames transit facility expansion .............
700,000
Iowa .........................
Cedar Rapids intermodal facility ...........
3,500,000
Iowa .........................
Clinton transit facility expansion ..........
500,000
Iowa .........................
Fort Dodge, Intermodal Facility (Phase
II) ..........................................................
885,000
Iowa .........................
Iowa City intermodal facility .................
1,500,000
Iowa .........................
Iowa statewide buses and bus facilities
2,500,000
Iowa .........................
Iowa/Illinois Transit Consortium bus
safety and security ..............................
1,000,000
Illinois .....................
East Moline transit center .....................
650,000
Illinois .....................
Illinois statewide buses and bus-related
equipment ............................................
8,200,000
100
Indiana ....................
Gary, Transit Consortium buses ............
1,250,000
101
Indiana ....................
Indianapolis buses ..................................
5,000,000
102
Indiana ....................
South Bend Urban Intermodal Trans-
portation Facility .................................
1,250,000
103
Indiana ....................
West Lafayette bus transfer station/ter-
minal (Wabash Landing) ....................
1,750,000
104
Kansas ....................
Girard, buses and vans ...........................
700,000
105
Kansas ....................
Johnson County, farebox equipment .....
250,000
106
Kansas ....................
Kansas City buses ...................................
750,000
107
Kansas ....................
Kansas 
Public 
Transit 
Association
buses and bus facilities .......................
1,500,000
108
Kansas ....................
Girard Southeast Kansas Community
Action Agency maintenance facility ...
480,000
109
Kansas ....................
Topeka Transit downtown transfer fa-
cility ......................................................
600,000
110
Kansas ....................
Wichita, buses and bus facilities ...........
2,500,000
111
Kentucky .................
Transit 
Authority 
of 
Northern
Kentucky (TANK) buses .....................
2,500,000
112
Kentucky .................
Kentucky 
(southern 
and 
eastern)
transit vehicles ....................................
1,000,000
113
Kentucky .................
Lexington 
(LexTran), 
maintenance
facility ...................................................
1,000,000
114
Kentucky .................
River City, buses .....................................
1,500,000
115
Louisiana ................
Louisiana statewide buses and bus-
related facilities ...................................
5,000,000
116
Massachusetts ........
Attleboro intermodal transit facility .....
500,000
117
Massachusetts ........
Brockton 
intermodal 
transportation
center ....................................................
1,100,000
118
Massachusetts ........
Greenfield Montague, buses ...................
500,000
119
Massachusetts ........
Merrimack Valley Regional Transit
Authority bus facilities .......................
467,500
120
Massachusetts ........
Montachusett, bus and park-and-ride
facilities ................................................
1,250,000
121
Massachusetts ........
Pioneer Valley, alternative fuel and
paratransit vehicles .............................
650,000
122
Massachusetts ........
Pittsfield intermodal center ...................
3,600,000
H. R. 2084—20
No.
State
Project
Conference
123
Massachusetts ........
Springfield, Union Station .....................
1,250,000
124
Massachusetts ........
Swampscott, buses ..................................
65,000
125
Massachusetts ........
Westfield, 
intermodal 
transportation
facility ...................................................
500,000
126
Massachusetts ........
Worcester, Union Station Intermodal
Transportation Center ........................
2,500,000
127
Maryland ................
Maryland statewide bus facilities and
buses .....................................................
11,500,000
128
Michigan .................
Detroit, transfer terminal facilities .......
3,963,000
129
Michigan .................
Detroit, EZ Ride program .......................
287,000
130
Michigan .................
Menominee-Delta-Schoolcraft buses ......
250,000
131
Michigan .................
Michigan statewide buses ......................
22,500,000
132
Michigan .................
Port Huron, CNG fueling station ..........
500,000
133
Minnesota ...............
Duluth, Transit Authority community
circulation vehicles ..............................
1,000,000
134
Minnesota ...............
Duluth, Transit Authority intelligent
transportation systems .......................
500,000
135
Minnesota ...............
Duluth, Transit Authority Transit Hub
500,000
136
Minnesota ...............
Greater Minnesota transit authorities ..
500,000
137
Minnesota ...............
Northstar Corridor, Intermodal Facili-
ties and buses ......................................
10,000,000
138
Minnesota ...............
Twin Cities metropolitan buses and bus
facilities ................................................
10,000,000
139
Missouri ..................
Columbia buses and vans .......................
500,000
140
Missouri ..................
Southeast Missouri transportation serv-
ice rural, elderly, disabled service .....
1,250,000
141
Missouri ..................
Franklin 
County 
buses 
and 
bus
facilities ................................................
200,000
142
Missouri ..................
Jackson County buses and bus facilities
500,000
143
Missouri ..................
Kansas City Area Transit Authority
buses and Troost transit center .........
2,500,000
144
Missouri ..................
Missouri 
statewide 
bus 
and 
bus
facilities ................................................
3,500,000
145
Missouri ..................
OATS Transit ..........................................
1,500,000
146
Missouri ..................
St. Joseph buses and vans .....................
500,000
147
Missouri ..................
St. Louis, buses .......................................
2,000,000
148
Missouri ..................
St. Louis, Bi-state Intermodal Center ...
1,250,000
149
Missouri ..................
Southwest Missouri State University
park and ride facility ..........................
1,000,000
150
Mississippi ..............
Harrison County multimodal center .....
3,000,000
151
Mississippi ..............
Jackson, maintenance and administra-
tion facility project ..............................
1,000,000
152
Mississippi ..............
North Delta planning and development
district, buses and bus facilities .........
1,200,000
153
Montana ..................
Missoula urban transportation district
buses .....................................................
600,000
154
North Carolina .......
Greensboro multimodal center ...............
3,339,000
155
North Carolina .......
Greensboro, Transit Authority buses ....
1,500,000
156
North Carolina .......
North Carolina statewide buses and
bus facilities .........................................
2,492,000
157
North Dakota ..........
North Dakota statewide buses and bus-
related facilities ...................................
1,000,000
158
New Hampshire .....
New 
Hampshire 
statewide 
transit
systems .................................................
3,000,000
159
New Jersey .............
New Jersey Transit alternative fuel
buses .....................................................
5,000,000
160
New Jersey .............
New Jersey Transit jitney shuttle buses
1,750,000
161
New Jersey .............
Newark intermodal and arena access
improvements ......................................
1,650,000
162
New Jersey .............
Newark, Morris & Essex Station access
and buses .............................................
1,250,000
H. R. 2084—21
No.
State
Project
Conference
163
New Jersey .............
South 
Amboy, 
Regional 
Intermodal
Transportation Initiative ....................
1,250,000
164
New Mexico ............
Albuquerque West Side transit facility
2,000,000
165
New Mexico ............
Albuquerque, buses .................................
1,250,000
166
New Mexico ............
Las Cruces buses and bus facilities .......
750,000
167
New Mexico ............
Northern New Mexico Transit Express/
Park and Ride buses ...........................
2,750,000
168
New Mexico ............
Santa Fe, buses and bus facilities .........
2,000,000
169
Nevada ....................
Clark County Regional Transportation
Commission buses and bus facilities
2,500,000
170
Nevada ....................
Lake Tahoe CNG buses ..........................
700,000
171
Nevada ....................
Washoe County transit improvements ..
2,250,000
172
New York ................
Babylon Intermodal Center ....................
1,250,000
173
New York ................
Buffalo, Auditorium Intermodal Center
2,000,000
174
New York ................
Dutchess County, Loop System buses ...
521,000
175
New York ................
Ithaca intermodal transportation center
1,125,000
176
New York ................
Ithaca, TCAT bus technology improve-
ments ....................................................
1,250,000
177
New York ................
Long Island, CNG transit vehicles and
facilities and bus replacement ............
1,250,000
178
New York ................
Mineola/Hicksville, LIRR intermodal
centers ..................................................
1,250,000
179
New York ................
New York City Midtown West 38th
Street ferry terminal ...........................
1,000,000
180
New York ................
New York, West 72nd St. Intermodal
Station ..................................................
1,750,000
181
New York ................
Putnam County, vans .............................
470,000
182
New York ................
Rensselaer intermodal bus facility ........
6,000,000
183
New York ................
Rochester buses and bus facility ............
1,000,000
184
New York ................
Syracuse, buses .......................................
3,000,000
185
New York ................
Utica Union Station ................................
2,100,000
186
New York ................
Westchester County DOT, articulated
buses .....................................................
1,250,000
187
New York ................
Westchester County, Bee-Line transit
system fareboxes .................................
979,000
188
New York ................
Westchester County, Bee-Line transit
system shuttle buses ...........................
1,000,000
189
Ohio .........................
Cleveland, Triskett Garage bus main-
tenance facility ....................................
625,000
190
Ohio .........................
Dayton, 
Multimodal 
Transportation
Center ...................................................
4,125,000
191
Ohio .........................
Ohio statewide buses and bus facilities
9,010,250
192
Oklahoma ................
Oklahoma statewide bus facilities and
buses .....................................................
5,000,000
193
Oregon .....................
Corvallis buses and automated pas-
senger information system .................
300,000
194
Oregon .....................
Lane County, Bus Rapid Transit, buses
and facilities ........................................
4,400,000
195
Oregon .....................
Lincoln County Transit District buses ..
250,000
196
Oregon .....................
Portland, Tri-Met bus maintenance
facility ...................................................
650,000
197
Oregon .....................
Portland, Tri-Met buses ..........................
1,750,000
198
Oregon .....................
Salem Area Mass Transit District
natural gas buses ................................
500,000
199
Oregon .....................
Sandy buses .............................................
100,000
200
Oregon .....................
South 
Metro 
Area 
Rapid 
Transit
(SMART) maintenance facility ...........
200,000
201
Oregon .....................
Sunset Empire Transit District inter-
modal transit facility ...........................
300,000
202
Pennsylvania ..........
Allegheny County buses .........................
1,500,000
203
Pennsylvania ..........
Altoona bus testing .................................
3,000,000
H. R. 2084—22
No.
State
Project
Conference
204
Pennsylvania ..........
Altoona, Metro Transit Authority buses
and transit system improvements .....
842,000
205
Pennsylvania ..........
Armstrong 
County-Mid-County, 
bus
facilities and buses ..............................
150,000
206
Pennsylvania ..........
Bethlehem, intermodal facility ..............
1,000,000
207
Pennsylvania ..........
Cambria County, bus facilities and
buses .....................................................
575,000
208
Pennsylvania ..........
Centre Area Transportation Authority
buses .....................................................
1,250,000
209
Pennsylvania ..........
Chester County, Paoli Transportation
Center ...................................................
1,000,000
210
Pennsylvania ..........
Erie, Metropolitan Transit Authority
buses .....................................................
1,000,000
211
Pennsylvania ..........
Fayette County, intermodal facilities
and buses .............................................
1,270,000
212
Pennsylvania ..........
Lackawanna County Transit System
buses .....................................................
600,000
213
Pennsylvania ..........
Lackawanna County, intermodal bus
facility ...................................................
1,000,000
214
Pennsylvania ..........
Mid-Mon Valley buses and bus facilities
250,000
215
Pennsylvania ..........
Norristown, parking garage (SEPTA) ...
1,000,000
216
Pennsylvania ..........
Philadelphia, Frankford Transportation
Center ...................................................
5,000,000
217
Pennsylvania ..........
Philadelphia, Intermodal 30th Street
Station ..................................................
1,250,000
218
Pennsylvania ..........
Reading, BARTA Intermodal Trans-
portation Facility .................................
1,750,000
219
Pennsylvania ..........
Robinson, Towne Center Intermodal
Facility .................................................
1,500,000
220
Pennsylvania ..........
Somerset County bus facilities and
buses .....................................................
175,000
221
Pennsylvania ..........
Towamencin Township, Intermodal Bus
Transportation Center ........................
1,500,000
222
Pennsylvania ..........
Washington 
County 
intermodal
facilities ................................................
630,000
223
Pennsylvania ..........
Westmoreland 
County, 
Intermodal
Facility .................................................
200,000
224
Pennsylvania ..........
Wilkes-Barre, Intermodal Facility .........
1,250,000
225
Pennsylvania ..........
Williamsport bus facility ........................
1,200,000
226
Puerto Rico .............
San Juan Intermodal access ..................
600,000
227
Rhode Island ...........
Providence, buses and bus maintenance
facility ...................................................
3,294,000
228
South Carolina .......
Central Midlands COG/Columbia tran-
sit system .............................................
2,700,000
229
South Carolina .......
Charleston 
Area 
regional 
transpor-
tation authority ...................................
1,900,000
230
South Carolina .......
Clemson Area Transit buses and bus
equipment ............................................
550,000
231
South Carolina .......
Greenville transit authority ...................
500,000
232
South Carolina .......
Pee Dee buses and facilities ...................
900,000
233
South Carolina .......
Santee-Wateree regional transportation
authority ..............................................
400,000
234
South Carolina .......
South 
Carolina 
Statewide 
Virtual
Transit Enterprise ...............................
1,220,000
235
South Carolina .......
Transit Management of Spartanburg,
Incorporated (SPARTA) ......................
600,000
236
South Dakota ..........
South Dakota statewide bus facilities
and buses .............................................
1,500,000
237
Tennessee ...............
Southern Coalition for Advanced Trans-
portation (SCAT) (TN, GA, FL, AL)
electric buses ........................................
3,500,000
238
Texas .......................
Austin buses ............................................
1,750,000
H. R. 2084—23
No.
State
Project
Conference
239
Texas .......................
Beaumont Municipal Transit System
buses and bus facilities .......................
1,000,000
240
Texas .......................
Brazos Transit Authority buses and
bus facilities .........................................
1,000,000
241
Texas .......................
El Paso Sun Metro buses .......................
1,000,000
242
Texas .......................
Fort Worth bus replacement (including
CNG 
vehicles) 
and 
paratransit
vehicles .................................................
2,500,000
243
Texas .......................
Forth Worth intermodal transportation
center ....................................................
3,100,000
244
Texas .......................
Galveston buses and bus facilities .........
1,000,000
245
Texas .......................
Texas statewide small urban and rural
buses .....................................................
5,000,000
246
Utah ........................
Ogden Intermodal Center .......................
800,000
247
Utah ........................
Salt Lake City Olympics bus facilities ..
2,500,000
248
Utah ........................
Salt Lake City Olympics regional park
and ride lots .........................................
2,500,000
249
Utah ........................
Salt Lake City Olympics transit bus
loan project ..........................................
500,000
250
Utah ........................
Utah Transit Authority, intermodal
facilities ................................................
1,500,000
251
Utah ........................
Utah 
Transit 
Authority/Park 
City
Transit, buses ......................................
6,500,000
252
Virginia ...................
Alexandria, bus maintenance facility ....
1,000,000
253
Virginia ...................
Richmond, 
GRTC 
bus 
maintenance
facility ...................................................
1,250,000
254
Virginia ...................
Statewide buses and bus facilities .........
8,435,000
255
Vermont ..................
Burlington multimodal center ................
2,700,000
256
Vermont ..................
Chittenden 
County 
Transportation
Authority buses ...................................
800,000
257
Vermont ..................
Essex 
Junction 
multimodal 
station
rehabilitation .......................................
500,000
258
Vermont ..................
Killington-Sherburne 
satellite 
bus
facility ...................................................
250,000
259
Washington .............
Bremerton 
multimodal 
center—
Sinclair’s Landing ................................
750,000
260
Washington .............
Sequim Clallam Transit multimodal
center ....................................................
1,000,000
261
Washington .............
Everett, 
Multimodal 
Transportation
Center ...................................................
1,950,000
262
Washington .............
Grant County, Grant Transit Authority
500,000
263
Washington .............
Grays 
Harbor 
County, 
buses 
and
equipment ............................................
1,250,000
264
Washington .............
King County Metro King Street Station
2,000,000
265
Washington .............
King 
County 
Metro 
Atlantic 
and
Central buses .......................................
1,500,000
266
Washington .............
King County park and ride expansion ..
1,350,000
267
Washington .............
Mount Vernon, buses and bus related
facilities ................................................
1,750,000
268
Washington .............
Pierce County Transit buses and bus
facilities ................................................
500,000
269
Washington .............
Seattle, 
intermodal 
transportation
terminal ................................................
1,250,000
270
Washington .............
Snohomish County, Community Transit
buses, equipment and facilities ..........
1,250,000
271
Washington .............
Spokane, HEV buses ...............................
1,500,000
272
Washington .............
Tacoma Dome Station .............................
250,000
273
Washington .............
Vancouver Clark County (C–TRAN)
bus facilities .........................................
1,000,000
274
Washington .............
Washington State DOT combined small
transit 
system 
buses 
and 
bus
facilities ................................................
2,000,000
H. R. 2084—24
No.
State
Project
Conference
275
Wisconsin ................
Milwaukee County, buses ......................
6,000,000
276
Wisconsin ................
Wisconsin statewide bus facilities and
buses .....................................................
14,250,000
277
West Virginia .........
Huntington intermodal facility ..............
12,000,000
278
West Virginia .........
Parkersburg, intermodal transportation
facility ...................................................
4,500,000
279
West Virginia .........
West Virginia Statewide Intermodal
Facility and buses ...............................
5,000,000;
and there shall be available for new fixed guideway systems
$980,400,000, to be available as follows:
$10,400,000 for Alaska or Hawaii ferry projects;
$45,142,000 for the Atlanta, Georgia, North line extension
project;
$1,000,000 for the Austin, Texas capital metro northwest/
north central corridor project;
$4,750,000 for the Baltimore central LRT double track
project;
$3,000,000 for the Birmingham, Alabama transit corridor;
$1,000,000 for the Boston Urban Ring project;
$500,000 for the Calais, Maine branch rail line regional
transit program;
$2,500,000 for the Canton-Akron-Cleveland commuter rail
project;
$2,500,000 for the Charleston, South Carolina Monobeam
corridor project;
$4,000,000 for the Charlotte, North Carolina, north-south
corridor transitway project;
$25,000,000 for the Chicago METRA commuter rail project;
$3,500,000 for the Chicago Transit Authority Douglas
branch line project;
$3,500,000 for the Chicago Transit Authority Ravenswood
branch line project;
$1,000,000 for the Cincinnati northeast/northern Kentucky
corridor project;
$3,500,000 for the Clark County, Nevada, fixed guideway
project, together with unobligated funds provided in Public
Law 103–331 for the ‘‘Burlington to Gloucester, New Jersey
line’’;
$1,000,000 for the Cleveland Euclid corridor improvement
project;
$1,000,000 for the Colorado Roaring Fork Valley project;
$50,000,000 for the Dallas north central light rail extension
project;
$1,000,000 for the Dayton, Ohio, light rail study;
$3,000,000 for the Denver Southeast corridor project;
$35,000,000 for the Denver Southwest corridor project;
$25,000,000 for the Dulles corridor project;
$10,000,000 for the Fort Lauderdale, Florida Tri-County
commuter rail project;
$1,500,000 for the Galveston, Texas rail trolley extension
project;
$10,000,000 for the Girdwood, Alaska commuter rail
project;
$7,000,000 for the Greater Albuquerque mass transit
project;
H. R. 2084—25
$500,000 for the Harrisburg-Lancaster capital area transit
corridor 1 commuter rail project;
$3,000,000 for the Houston advanced transit program;
$52,770,000 for the Houston regional bus project;
$1,000,000 for the Indianapolis, Indiana Northeast Down-
town corridor project;
$1,000,000 for the Johnson County, Kansas, I–35 commuter
rail project;
$1,000,000 for the Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee rail exten-
sion project;
$500,000 for the Knoxville-Memphis commuter rail feasi-
bility study;
$2,000,000 for the Long Island Railroad East Side access
project;
$1,000,000 for the Los Angeles-San Diego LOSSAN corridor
project;
$4,000,000 for the Los Angeles Mid-City and East Side
corridors projects;
$50,000,000 for the Los Angeles North Hollywood extension
project;
$1,000,000 for the Lowell, Massachusetts-Nashua, New
Hampshire commuter rail project;
$703,000 for the MARC commuter rail project;
$1,500,000 for MARC expansion projects—Silver Spring
intermodal and Penn-Camden rail connection;
$1,000,000 for the Massachusetts North Shore corridor
project;
$2,500,000 for the Memphis, Tennessee, Medical Center
rail extension project;
$1,500,000 
for 
the 
Miami-Dade 
Transit 
east-west
multimodal corridor project;
$1,000,000 for the Nashville, Tennessee, commuter rail
project;
$99,000,000 for the New Jersey Hudson Bergen project;
$5,000,000 for the New Jersey/New York Trans-Hudson
Midtown corridor;
$1,000,000 for the New Orleans Canal Street corridor
project;
$12,000,000 for the Newark rail link MOS–1 project;
$1,000,000 for the Norfolk-Virginia Beach corridor project;
$4,000,000 for the Northern Indiana south shore commuter
rail project;
$2,000,000 for the Oceanside-Escondido, California light
rail system;
$10,000,000 
for 
temporary 
and 
permanent 
Olympic
transportation infrastructure investments: Provided, That these
funds shall be allocated by the Secretary based on the approved
transportation management plan for the Salt Lake City 2002
Winter Olympic Games: Provided further, That none of these
funds shall be available for rail extensions;
$1,000,000 for the Orange County, California, transitway
project;
$5,000,000 for the Orlando Lynx light rail project
(phase 1);
$500,000 for the Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade
counties rail corridor;
H. R. 2084—26
$4,000,000 for the Philadelphia-Reading SETPA Schuylkill
Valley metro project;
$1,000,000 for the Philadelphia SEPTA cross-county metro;
$5,000,000 for the Phoenix metropolitan area transit
project;
$2,500,000 for the Pinellas County, Florida, mobility initia-
tive project;
$10,000,000 for the Pittsburgh North Shore-central busi-
ness district corridor project;
$8,000,000 for the Pittsburgh stage II light rail project;
$11,062,000 for the Portland Westside light rail transit
project;
$25,000,000 for the Puget Sound RTA Link light rail
project;
$5,000,000 for the Puget Sound RTA Sounder commuter
rail project;
$8,000,000 for the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Triangle
transit project;
$25,000,000 for the Sacramento south corridor LRT project;
$37,928,000 for the Utah north/south light rail project;
$1,000,000 for the San Bernardino, California Metrolink
project;
$5,000,000 for the San Diego Mid Coast corridor project;
$20,000,000 for the San Diego Mission Valley East light
rail transit project;
$65,000,000 for the San Francisco BART extension to the
airport project;
$20,000,000 for the San Jose Tasman West light rail
project;
$32,000,000 for the San Juan Tren Urbano project;
$3,000,000 for the Santa Fe/El Dorado, New Mexico rail
link;
$53,895,000 for the South Boston piers transitway;
$1,000,000 for the South Dekalb-Lindbergh, Georgia, cor-
ridor project;
$2,000,000 for the Spokane, Washington, South Valley cor-
ridor light rail project;
$2,500,000 for the St. Louis, Missouri, MetroLink cross
county corridor project;
$50,000,000 for the St. Louis-St. Clair County MetroLink
light rail (phase II) extension project;
$1,000,000 for the Stamford, Connecticut fixed guideway
connector;
$1,000,000 for the Stockton, California Altamont commuter
rail project;
$1,000,000 for the Tampa Bay regional rail project;
$3,000,000 for the Twin Cities Transitways projects;
$42,800,000 for the Twin Cities Transitways—Hiawatha
corridor project;
$2,200,000 for the Virginia Railway Express commuter rail
project;
$4,750,000 for the Washington Metro-Blue Line extension-
Addison Road (Largo) project;
$1,000,000 for the West Trenton, New Jersey, rail project;
$2,000,000 for the Whitehall ferry terminal reconstruction
project;
H. R. 2084—27
$1,000,000 for the Wilmington, Delaware downtown transit
connector; and
$500,000 for the Wilsonville to Washington County, Oregon
connection to Westside.
DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for payment of
previous obligations incurred in carrying out 49 U.S.C. 5338(b),
$1,500,000,000, to remain available until expended and to be
derived from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund.
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE GRANTS
For necessary expenses to carry out section 3037 of the Federal
Transit Act of 1998, $15,000,000, to remain available until
expended: Provided, That no more than $75,000,000 of budget
authority shall be available for these purposes.
SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation is
hereby authorized to make such expenditures, within the limits
of funds and borrowing authority available to the Corporation,
and in accord with law, and to make such contracts and commit-
ments without regard to fiscal year limitations as provided by
section 104 of the Government Corporation Control Act, as
amended, as may be necessary in carrying out the programs set
forth in the Corporation’s budget for the current fiscal year.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
(HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND)
For necessary expenses for operations and maintenance of those
portions of the Saint Lawrence Seaway operated and maintained
by 
the 
Saint 
Lawrence 
Seaway 
Development 
Corporation,
$12,042,000, to be derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust
Fund, pursuant to Public Law 99–662.
RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION
RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS
For expenses necessary to discharge the functions of the
Research and Special Programs Administration, $32,061,000, of
which $645,000 shall be derived from the Pipeline Safety Fund,
and of which $3,704,000 shall remain available until September
30, 2002: Provided, That up to $1,200,000 in fees collected under
49 U.S.C. 5108(g) shall be deposited in the general fund of the
Treasury as offsetting receipts: Provided further, That there may
be credited to this appropriation, to be available until expended,
funds received from States, counties, municipalities, other public