883 
† HR 5515 EAS 
tions for improving the enforcement of such 
agreements and conditions. 
‘‘(H) Cumulative and, as appropriate, 
trend information on the number of declarations 
filed under subsection (b)(1)(C)(v), the actions 
taken by the Committee in response to those dec-
larations, the business sectors involved in those 
declarations, and the countries involved in those 
declarations. 
‘‘(I) A description of— 
‘‘(i) the methods used by the Committee 
to monitor non-notified and non-declared 
transactions under subsection (b)(1)(H); 
‘‘(ii) potential methods to improve such 
monitoring and the resources required to do 
so; and 
‘‘(iii) the number of transactions iden-
tified through the mechanism established 
under that subsection during the reporting 
period and the number of such transactions 
flagged for further review.’’; 
(2) in paragraph (3)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES’’ 
and all that follows through ‘‘In order to assist’’
884 
† HR 5515 EAS 
and inserting ‘‘CRITICAL
TECHNOLOGIES.—In 
order to assist’’; 
(B) by striking subparagraph (B); and 
(C) by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) as 
subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and by 
moving such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 
2 ems to the left; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) FORM OF REPORT.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—All appropriate por-
tions of the annual report under paragraph (1) 
may be classified. An unclassified version of the 
report, as appropriate, consistent with safe-
guarding national security and privacy, shall be 
made available to the public. 
‘‘(B) 
INCLUSIONS
IN
UNCLASSIFIED 
VERSION.—The unclassified version of the report 
required under paragraph (1) shall include, with 
respect to covered transactions for the reporting 
period— 
‘‘(i) the number of notices submitted 
under subsection (b)(1)(C)(i); 
‘‘(ii) the number of declarations sub-
mitted under subsection (b)(1)(C)(v) and 
the number of such declarations that were
885 
† HR 5515 EAS 
required under subclause (IV) of that sub-
section; 
‘‘(iii) the number of declarations sub-
mitted under subsection (b)(1)(C)(v) for 
which the Committee required resubmission 
as notices under subsection (b)(1)(C)(i); 
‘‘(iv) the average number of days that 
elapsed between submission of a declaration 
under subsection (b)(1)(C)(v) and the ac-
ceptance of the declaration by the Com-
mittee; 
‘‘(v) information on the time it took 
the Committee to provide comments on, or 
to accept, notices submitted under sub-
section (b)(1)(C)(i), including— 
‘‘(I) the average number of busi-
ness days that elapsed between the date 
of submission of a draft notice and the 
date on which the Committee provided 
written comments on the draft notice; 
‘‘(II) the average number of busi-
ness days that elapsed between the date 
of submission of a final notice and the 
date on which the Committee accepted
886 
† HR 5515 EAS 
or provided written comments on the 
final notice; and 
‘‘(III) if the average number of 
business days for a response by the 
Committee reported under subclause (I) 
or (II) exceeded 10 business days— 
‘‘(aa) an explanation of the 
causes of such delays, including 
whether such delays are caused by 
resource shortages, unusual fluc-
tuations in the volume of notices, 
transaction 
characteristics, 
or 
other factors; and 
‘‘(bb) an explanation of the 
steps that the Committee antici-
pates taking to mitigate the 
causes of such delays and other-
wise to improve the ability of the 
Committee to provide comments 
on, or to accept, notices within 10 
business days; 
‘‘(vi) the number of reviews or inves-
tigations conducted under subsection (b);
887 
† HR 5515 EAS 
‘‘(vii) the number of investigations that 
were subject to an extension under sub-
section (b)(2)(C)(ii); 
‘‘(viii) information on the duration of 
those reviews and investigations, including 
the average number of days required to 
complete those reviews and investigations; 
‘‘(ix) the number of notices submitted 
under subsection (b)(1)(C)(i) and declara-
tions 
submitted 
under 
subsection 
(b)(1)(C)(v) that were rejected by the Com-
mittee; 
‘‘(x) the number of such notices and 
declarations that were withdrawn by a 
party to the covered transaction; 
‘‘(xi) the number of such withdrawals 
that were followed by the submission of a 
subsequent such notice or declaration relat-
ing to a substantially similar covered trans-
action; and 
‘‘(xii) such other specific, cumulative, 
or trend information that the Committee de-
termines is advisable to provide for an as-
sessment of the time required for reviews
888 
† HR 5515 EAS 
and investigations of covered transactions 
under this section.’’. 
(b) REPORT ON CHINESE INVESTMENT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 2 
years thereafter through 2026, the Secretary of Com-
merce shall submit to Congress and the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States a report on 
foreign direct investment transactions made by enti-
ties of the People’s Republic of China in the United 
States. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required by para-
graph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) Total foreign direct investment from the 
People’s Republic of China in the United States, 
including 
total 
foreign 
direct 
investment 
disaggregated by ultimate beneficial owner. 
(B) A breakdown of investments from the 
People’s Republic of China in the United States 
by value using the following categories: 
(i) Less than $50,000,000. 
(ii) 
Greater 
than 
or 
equal 
to 
$50,000,000 and less than $100,000,000. 
(iii) 
Greater 
than 
or 
equal 
to 
$100,000,000 and less than $1,000,000,000.
889 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(iv) 
Greater 
than 
or 
equal 
to 
$1,000,000,000 
and 
less 
than 
$2,000,000,000. 
(v) 
Greater 
than 
or 
equal 
to 
$2,000,000,000 
and 
less 
than 
$5,000,000,000. 
(vi) 
Greater 
than 
or 
equal 
to 
$5,000,000,000. 
(C) A breakdown of investments from the 
People’s Republic of China in the United States 
by 2-digit North American Industry Classifica-
tion System code. 
(D) A breakdown of investments from the 
People’s Republic of China in the United States 
by investment type, using the following cat-
egories: 
(i) Businesses established. 
(ii) Businesses acquired. 
(E) A breakdown of investments from the 
People’s Republic of China in the United States 
by government and non-government investments, 
including volume, sector, and type of investment 
within each category.
890 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(F) A list of companies incorporated in the 
United States purchased through government in-
vestment by the People’s Republic of China. 
(G) The number of United States affiliates 
of entities under the jurisdiction of the People’s 
Republic of China, the total employees at those 
affiliates, and the valuation for any publicly 
traded United States affiliate of such an entity. 
(H) An analysis of patterns in the invest-
ments described in subparagraphs (A) through 
(F), including in volume, type, and sector, and 
the extent to which those patterns of investments 
align with the objectives outlined by the Govern-
ment of the People’s Republic of China in its 
Made in China 2025 plan, including a compara-
tive analysis of investments from the People’s 
Republic of China in the United States and all 
foreign direct investment in the United States. 
(I) An identification of any limitations on 
the ability of the Secretary of Commerce to col-
lect comprehensive information that is reason-
ably and lawfully available about foreign invest-
ment in the United States from the People’s Re-
public of China on a timeline necessary to com-
891 
† HR 5515 EAS 
plete reports every 2 years as required by para-
graph (1), including— 
(i) an identification of any discrep-
ancies between government and private sec-
tor estimates of investments from the Peo-
ple’s Republic of China in the United 
States; 
(ii) a description of the different meth-
odologies or data collection methods, includ-
ing by private sector entities, used to meas-
ure foreign investment that may result in 
different estimates; and 
(iii) recommendations for enhancing 
the ability of the Secretary of Commerce to 
improve data collection of information 
about foreign investment in the United 
States from the People’s Republic of China. 
(3) EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.—If, as a result of 
a limitation identified under paragraph (2)(I), the 
Secretary of Commerce determines that the Secretary 
will be unable to submit a report at the time required 
by paragraph (1), the Secretary may request addi-
tional time to complete the report. 
(c) REPORT ON CERTAIN INVESTMENTS BY STATE- 
OWNED OR STATE-CONTROLLED ENTITIES.—
892 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, an appropriate 
member or members of the Committee on Foreign In-
vestment in the United States shall, in coordination 
with the chairperson of the Committee, submit to 
Congress a report assessing— 
(A) national security threats related to in-
vestments in the United States by state-owned or 
state-controlled entities in the manufacture or 
assembly of rolling stock or other assets for use 
in freight rail, public transportation, or inter-
city passenger rail systems, including the con-
struction of new facilities; 
(B) how the number and types of such in-
vestments could affect any such threats; and 
(C) the authority and ability of the Com-
mittee to respond to such threats. 
(2) CONSULTATION.—The member or members of 
the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 
States preparing the report required by paragraph 
(1) shall consult with the Secretary of Transportation 
and the head of any agency that is not represented on 
the Committee that has significant technical expertise 
related to the assessments required by paragraph (1).
893 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 1719. CERTIFICATION OF NOTICES AND INFORMATION. 
Section 721(n) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 
(50 U.S.C. 4565(n)) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and by mov-
ing such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to 
the right; 
(2) by striking ‘‘Each notice’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each notice’’; 
(3) by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(B)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘paragraph (6)(B)’’; 
(4) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)’’; 
(5) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) EFFECT
OF
FAILURE
TO
SUBMIT.—The 
Committee may not complete a review under this sec-
tion of a covered transaction and may recommend to 
the President that the President suspend or prohibit 
the transaction or require divestment under sub-
section (d) if the Committee determines that a party 
to the transaction has— 
‘‘(A) failed to submit a statement required 
by paragraph (1); or 
‘‘(B) included false or misleading informa-
tion in a notice or information described in
894 
† HR 5515 EAS 
paragraph (1) or omitted material information 
from such notice or information. 
‘‘(3) APPLICABILITY
OF
LAW
ON
FRAUD
AND 
FALSE STATEMENTS.—The Committee shall prescribe 
regulations expressly providing for the application of 
section 1001 of title 18, United States Code, to all in-
formation provided to the Committee under this sec-
tion by any party to a covered transaction.’’. 
SEC. 1720. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the chairperson of the 
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and 
the Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the 
appropriate members of the Committee— 
(1) develop plans to implement this title; and 
(2) submit to the appropriate congressional com-
mittees a report on the plans developed under para-
graph (1), which shall include a description of— 
(A) the timeline and process to implement 
the provisions of, and amendments made by, this 
title; 
(B) any additional staff necessary to imple-
ment the plans; and 
(C) the resources required to effectively im-
plement the plans.
895 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations 
of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1721. ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR ADDITIONAL RE-
SOURCES FOR COMMITTEE. 
The President shall— 
(1) determine whether and to what extent the ex-
pansion of the responsibilities of the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States pursuant to 
the amendments made by this title necessitates addi-
tional resources for the Committee and the depart-
ments and agencies represented on the Committee to 
perform their functions under section 721 of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950, as amended by this 
title; and 
(2) if the President determines that additional 
resources are necessary, include in the budget of the 
President for fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year 
thereafter submitted to Congress under section
896 
† HR 5515 EAS 
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a request for 
such additional resources. 
SEC. 1722. FUNDING. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(o) FUNDING.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.—There is estab-
lished in the Treasury of the United States a fund, 
to be known as the ‘Committee on Foreign Investment 
in the United States Fund’ (in this subsection re-
ferred to as the ‘Fund’), to be administered by the 
chairperson. 
‘‘(2) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE COM-
MITTEE.—There are authorized to be appropriated to 
the Fund such sums as may be necessary to perform 
the functions of the Committee. 
‘‘(3) FILING FEES.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Committee may as-
sess and collect a fee in an amount determined 
by the Committee in regulations, to the extent 
provided in advance in appropriations Acts, 
without regard to section 9701 of title 31, United 
States Code, and subject to subparagraph (B), 
with respect to each covered transaction for 
which a written notice is submitted to the Com-
897 
† HR 5515 EAS 
mittee under subsection (b)(1)(C)(i). The total 
amount of fees collected under this paragraph 
may not exceed the costs of administering this 
section. 
‘‘(B) DETERMINATION
OF
AMOUNT
OF 
FEE.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In determining the 
amount of the fee to be assessed under sub-
paragraph (A) with respect to a covered 
transaction, the Committee shall base the 
amount of the fee on the value of the trans-
action, taking into consideration— 
‘‘(I) the effect of the fee on small 
business concerns (as defined in section 
3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
632)); 
‘‘(II) the expenses of the Com-
mittee associated with conducting ac-
tivities under this section; 
‘‘(III) the effect of the fee on for-
eign investment; and 
‘‘(IV) such other matters as the 
Committee considers appropriate. 
‘‘(ii) PRIORITIZATION FEE.—The Com-
mittee may establish a fee or fee scale to
898 
† HR 5515 EAS 
prioritize the timing of the response of the 
Committee to a draft or final written notice 
during the period before the Committee ac-
cepts the final written notice under sub-
section (b)(1)(C)(i), in the event that the 
Committee is unable to respond during the 
time required by subclause (II) of that sub-
section because of an unusually large influx 
of notices, or for other reasons. 
‘‘(iii) UPDATES.—The Committee shall 
periodically reconsider and adjust the 
amount of the fee to be assessed under sub-
paragraph (A) with respect to a covered 
transaction to ensure that the amount of the 
fee does not exceed the costs of admin-
istering this section and otherwise remains 
appropriate. 
‘‘(C) 
DEPOSIT
AND
AVAILABILITY
OF 
FEES.—Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, 
United States Code, fees collected under subpara-
graph (A) shall— 
‘‘(i) be deposited into the Fund solely 
for use in carrying out activities under this 
section;
899 
† HR 5515 EAS 
‘‘(ii) to the extent and in the amounts 
provided in advance in appropriations 
Acts, be available to the chairperson; 
‘‘(iii) remain available until expended; 
and 
‘‘(iv) be in addition to any appropria-
tions made available to the members of the 
Committee. 
‘‘(4) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—To the extent pro-
vided in advance in appropriations Acts, the chair-
person may transfer any amounts in the Fund to any 
other department or agency represented on the Com-
mittee for the purpose of addressing emerging needs 
in carrying out activities under this section. Amounts 
so transferred shall be in addition to any other 
amounts available to that department or agency for 
that purpose.’’. 
SEC. 1723. CENTRALIZATION OF CERTAIN COMMITTEE 
FUNCTIONS. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565), as amended by section 1722, is further 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(p) CENTRALIZATION OF CERTAIN COMMITTEE FUNC-
TIONS.—
900 
† HR 5515 EAS 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The chairperson, in con-
sultation with the Committee, may centralize certain 
functions of the Committee within the Department of 
the Treasury for the purpose of enhancing interagency 
coordination and collaboration in carrying out the 
functions of the Committee under this section. 
‘‘(2) FUNCTIONS.—Functions that may be cen-
tralized under paragraph (1) include monitoring non- 
notified and non-declared transactions pursuant to 
subsection (b)(1)(H), and other functions as deter-
mined by the chairperson and the Committee. 
‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as limiting the authority of 
any department or agency represented on the Com-
mittee to represent its own interests before the Com-
mittee.’’. 
SEC. 1724. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565), as amended by this title, is further amend-
ed— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(D)(iii)(I), by striking 
‘‘subsection (l)(1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 
(l)(3)(A)’’; and
901 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(B) in paragraph (2)(B)(i)(I), by striking 
‘‘that threat’’ and inserting ‘‘the risk’’; 
(2) in subsection (d)(4)(A), by striking ‘‘the for-
eign interest exercising control’’ and inserting ‘‘a for-
eign person that would acquire an interest in a 
United States business or its assets as a result of the 
covered transaction’’; and 
(3) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘merger, acqui-
sition, or takeover’’ and inserting ‘‘transaction’’. 
SEC. 1725. REQUIREMENTS TO IDENTIFY AND CONTROL 
THE 
EXPORT 
OF 
EMERGING 
AND 
FOUNDATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES. 
(a) IDENTIFICATION OF TECHNOLOGIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall establish 
and, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, 
the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the 
Secretary of State, and the heads of other Federal 
agencies as appropriate, lead, a regular, ongoing 
interagency 
process 
to 
identify 
emerging 
and 
foundational technologies that— 
(A) are essential to the national security of 
the United States; and 
(B) are not critical technologies described in 
clauses (i) through (v) of section 721(a)(8)(B) of
902 
† HR 5515 EAS 
the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended 
by section 1703. 
(2) PROCESS.—The interagency process estab-
lished under subsection (a) shall— 
(A) be informed by multiple sources of in-
formation, including— 
(i) publicly available information; 
(ii) classified information, including 
relevant information provided by the Direc-
tor of National Intelligence; 
(iii) information relating to reviews 
and investigations of transactions by the 
Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
United States under section 721 of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
4565); and 
(iv) information provided by the advi-
sory committees established by the Secretary 
of Commerce to advise the Under Secretary 
of Commerce for Industry and Security on 
controls under the Export Administration 
Regulations, including the Emerging Tech-
nology and Research Advisory Committee; 
(B) take into account—
903 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(i) the development of emerging and 
foundational technologies in foreign coun-
tries; 
(ii) the effect export controls imposed 
pursuant to this section may have on the 
development of such technologies in the 
United States; and 
(iii) the effectiveness of export controls 
imposed pursuant to this section on lim-
iting the proliferation of emerging and 
foundational technologies to foreign coun-
tries; and 
(C) include a notice and comment period. 
(b) COMMERCE CONTROLS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 
shall establish appropriate controls under the Export 
Administration Regulations on the export, reexport, 
or in-country transfer of technology identified pursu-
ant to subsection (a), including by prescribing addi-
tional regulations. 
(2) LEVELS OF CONTROL.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Com-
merce may, in coordination with the Secretary 
of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the heads 
of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, specify
904 
† HR 5515 EAS 
the level of control to apply under paragraph (1) 
with respect to the export of technology described 
in that paragraph, including a requirement for 
a license or other authorization for the export, 
reexport, or in-country transfer of that tech-
nology. 
(B) 
CONSIDERATIONS.—In 
determining 
under subparagraph (A) the level of control ap-
propriate for technology described in paragraph 
(1), the Secretary of Commerce shall take into 
account— 
(i) lists of countries to which exports 
from the United States are restricted; and 
(ii) the potential end uses and end 
users of the technology. 
(C) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.—At a min-
imum, except as provided by paragraph (4), the 
Secretary of Commerce shall require a license for 
the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1) to or in a 
country subject to an embargo, including an 
arms embargo, imposed by the United States. 
(3) REVIEW OF LICENSE APPLICATIONS.— 
(A) PROCEDURES.—The procedures set forth 
in Executive Order 12981 (50 U.S.C. 4603 note;
905 
† HR 5515 EAS 
relating to administration of export controls) or 
a successor order shall apply to the review of an 
application for a license or other authorization 
for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1). 
(B) CONSIDERATION OF INFORMATION RE-
LATING TO NATIONAL SECURITY.—In reviewing 
an application for a license or other authoriza-
tion for the export, reexport, or in-country trans-
fer of technology described in paragraph (1), the 
Secretary of Commerce shall take into account 
information provided by the Director of National 
Intelligence regarding any threat to the national 
security of the United States posed by the pro-
posed export, reexport, or transfer. The Director 
of National Intelligence shall provide such infor-
mation on the request of the Secretary of Com-
merce. 
(C) DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COLLABO-
RATIVE ARRANGEMENTS.—In the case of an ap-
plication for a license or other authorization for 
the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1) submitted 
by or on behalf of a joint venture, joint develop-
ment agreement, or similar collaborative ar-
907 
† HR 5515 EAS 
nology described in paragraph (1) pursuant to 
any of the following transactions: 
(i) The sale or license of a finished 
item and the provision of associated tech-
nology if the United States person that is a 
party to the transaction generally makes the 
finished item and associated technology 
available to its customers, distributors, or 
resellers. 
(ii) The sale or license to a customer of 
a product and the provision of integration 
services or similar services if the United 
States person that is a party to the trans-
action generally makes such services avail-
able to its customers. 
(iii) The transfer of equipment and the 
provision of associated technology to operate 
the equipment if the transfer could not re-
sult in the foreign person using the equip-
ment to produce critical technologies (as de-
fined in section 721(a) of the Defense Pro-
duction Act of 1950, as amended by section 
1703). 
(iv) The procurement by the United 
States person that is a party to the trans-
908 
† HR 5515 EAS 
action of goods or services, including manu-
facturing services, from a foreign person 
that is a party to the transaction, if the for-
eign person has no rights to exploit any 
technology contributed by the United States 
person other than to supply the procured 
goods or services. 
(v) Any contribution and associated 
support by a United States person that is 
a party to the transaction to an industry 
organization related to a standard or speci-
fication, whether in development or de-
clared, including any license of or commit-
ment to license intellectual property in com-
pliance with the rules of any standards or-
ganization (as defined by the Secretary by 
regulation). 
(c) MULTILATERAL CONTROLS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the 
Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal 
agencies, as appropriate, may propose that any tech-
nology identified pursuant to subsection (a) be added 
to the list of technologies controlled by the relevant 
multilateral export control regimes.
909 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(2) ITEMS
ON
COMMERCE
CONTROL
LIST
OR 
UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of State 
proposes to a multilateral export control regime 
under paragraph (1) to add a technology identi-
fied pursuant to subsection (a) to the control list 
of that regime and that regime does not add that 
technology to the control list during the 3-year 
period beginning on the date of the proposal, the 
applicable agency head may determine whether 
national security concerns warrant the continu-
ation of unilateral export controls with respect to 
that technology. 
(B) APPLICABLE AGENCY HEAD DEFINED.— 
In this paragraph, the term ‘‘applicable agency 
head’’ means— 
(i) in the case of technology listed on 
the Commerce Control List set forth in Sup-
plement No. 1 to part 774 of the Export Ad-
ministration Regulations, the Secretary of 
Commerce, in consultation with the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Secretary of State; 
and 
(ii) in the case of technology listed on 
the United States Munitions List set forth
910 
† HR 5515 EAS 
in part 121 of title 22, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, the Secretary of State, in consulta-
tion with the Secretary of Defense and the 
heads of other Federal agencies, as appro-
priate. 
(d) REPORT TO COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT 
IN THE UNITED STATES.—Not less frequently than every 
180 days, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with 
the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the 
heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall sub-
mit to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 
States a report on the results of actions taken pursuant to 
this section. 
(e) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not less frequently than 
every 180 days, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and 
the heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall 
submit a report on the results of actions taken pursuant 
to this section, including actions taken pursuant to sub-
sections (a), (b), and (c), to— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, 
the Committee on Armed Services, and the Select 
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
911 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services, the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 
Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 
(f) MODIFICATIONS TO EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND 
RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 
shall revise the objectives of the Emerging Technology 
and Research Advisory Committee, established by the 
Secretary under the Export Administration Regula-
tions, to include advising the interagency process es-
tablished under subsection (a) with respect to emerg-
ing and foundational technologies. 
(2) DUTIES.—The Secretary— 
(A) shall revise the duties of the Emerging 
Technology and Research Advisory Committee to 
include identifying emerging and foundational 
technologies that may be developed over a period 
of 5 years or 10 years; and 
(B) may revise the duties of the Advisory 
Committee to include identifying trends in— 
(i) the ownership by foreign persons 
and foreign governments of such tech-
nologies;
912 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(ii) the types of transactions related to 
such technologies engaged in by foreign per-
sons and foreign governments; 
(iii) the blending of private and gov-
ernment investment in such technologies; 
and 
(iv) efforts to obfuscate ownership of 
such technologies or to otherwise circumvent 
the controls established under this section. 
(3) MEETINGS.— 
(A) FREQUENCY.—The Emerging Tech-
nology and Research Advisory Committee should 
meet not less frequently than every 120 days. 
(B) ATTENDANCE.—A representative from 
each agency participating in the interagency 
process established under subsection (a) should be 
in attendance at each meeting of the Emerging 
Technology and Research Advisory Committee. 
(4) CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Not fewer than 
half of the members of the Emerging Technology and 
Research Advisory Committee should hold sufficient 
security clearances such that classified information, 
including classified information described in clauses 
(ii) and (iii) of subsection (a)(2)(A), from the inter-
agency process established under subsection (a) can be
913 
† HR 5515 EAS 
shared with those members to inform the advice pro-
vided by the Advisory Committee. 
(5) APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL ADVISORY COM-
MITTEE ACT.—Subsections (a)(1), (a)(3), and (b) of 
section 10 and sections 11, 13, and 14 of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not 
apply to the Emerging Technology and Research Ad-
visory Committee. 
(6) REPORT.—The Emerging Technology and 
Research Advisory Committee shall include the find-
ings of the Advisory Committee under this subsection 
in the annual report to Congress required by section 
14 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 
U.S.C. 4616) (as continued in effect pursuant to the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)). 
(g) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to alter or limit— 
(1) the authority of the President or the Sec-
retary of State to designate items as defense articles 
and defense services for the purposes of the Arms Ex-
port Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) or to other-
wise regulate such items; or 
(2) the authority of the President under the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.),
914 
† HR 5515 EAS 
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 
3201 et seq.), the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 
(42 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.), or the Export Administra-
tion Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (as contin-
ued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) or 
any other provision of law relating to the control of 
exports. 
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) EXPORT
ADMINISTRATION
REGULATIONS.— 
The term ‘‘Export Administration Regulations’’ 
means subchapter C of chapter VII of title 15, Code 
of Federal Regulations. 
(2) IN-COUNTRY TRANSFER.—The term ‘‘in-coun-
try transfer’’ has the meaning given to the term in 
the Export Administration Regulations. 
(3) REEXPORT.—The term ‘‘reexport’’ has the 
meaning given to the term in the Export Administra-
tion Regulations. 
(4) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘‘United 
States person’’ means any person subject to the juris-
diction of the United States. 
SEC. 1726. EXPORT CONTROL ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITIES.—In order to enforce the provisions 
of the Export Administration Regulations under subchapter
915 
† HR 5515 EAS 
C of chapter VII of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, 
issued under the authority of the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (pursuant 
to which the President has continued in effect authorities 
granted under the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 
U.S.C. 4601 et seq.)), the President shall delegate to the Sec-
retary of Commerce, in addition to existing authorities, the 
authority to authorize any law enforcement officer of the 
Department of Commerce to conduct investigations (includ-
ing undercover investigations) in the United States and in 
other countries when permitted under such countries’ laws 
using all applicable laws of the United States. 
(b) BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES.—The Secretary of 
Commerce, in consultation with the heads of appropriate 
Federal agencies, may publish and update best practices 
guidelines to assist persons in developing and imple-
menting, on a voluntary basis, effective export control pro-
grams in compliance with the Export Administration Reg-
ulations. 
(c) CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.— 
(1) EXEMPTIONS FROM DISCLOSURE.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—Information obtained 
under the Export Administration Act of 1979 
(50 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) (as continued in effect 
pursuant to the International Emergency Eco-
916 
† HR 5515 EAS 
nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) may 
be withheld from disclosure only to the extent 
permitted by statute, except that information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B) shall be withheld 
from public disclosure and shall not be subject to 
disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 5, 
United States Code, unless the release of such in-
formation is determined by the Secretary to be 
in the national interest. 
(B) INFORMATION
DESCRIBED.—Informa-
tion described in this subparagraph is informa-
tion submitted or obtained in connection with an 
application for a license or other authorization 
to export, reexport, or transfer items or engage 
in other activities, a recordkeeping or reporting 
requirement, enforcement activity, or other oper-
ations under the Export Administration Act of 
1979, including— 
(i) the license application, license, or 
other authorization itself; 
(ii) classification or advisory opinion 
requests, and any response to such a re-
quest; 
(iii) license determinations and infor-
mation pertaining to such determinations;
917 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(iv) information or evidence obtained 
in the course of any investigation; and 
(v) information obtained or furnished 
in connection with any international agree-
ment, treaty, or other obligation. 
(2) INFORMATION TO CONGRESS AND GAO.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as authorizing the withholding 
of information from Congress or the Comptroller 
General of the United States. 
(B) AVAILABILITY TO CONGRESS.— 
(i) IN
GENERAL.—Information ob-
tained at any time under any provision of 
the Export Administration Act of 1979 or 
the Export Administration Regulations, in-
cluding reports or license applications re-
quired under any such provision, shall be 
made available to a committee or sub-
committee of Congress of appropriate juris-
diction, upon the request of the chairman or 
ranking member of the committee or sub-
committee. 
(ii) PROHIBITION
ON
FURTHER
DIS-
CLOSURE.—No committee or subcommittee 
referred to in clause (i), or member thereof,
918 
† HR 5515 EAS 
may disclose any information made avail-
able under clause (i) that is submitted on a 
confidential basis unless the full committee 
determines that the withholding of that in-
formation is contrary to the national inter-
est. 
(C) AVAILABILITY TO GAO.— 
(i) IN
GENERAL.—Information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B)(i) shall be sub-
ject to the limitations contained in section 
716 of title 31, United States Code. 
(ii) PROHIBITION
ON
FURTHER
DIS-
CLOSURE.—An officer or employee of the 
Government Accountability Office may not 
disclose, except to Congress in accordance 
with this paragraph, any information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B)(i) that is sub-
mitted on a confidential basis or from 
which any individual can be identified. 
(3) INFORMATION SHARING.— 
(A) EXCHANGE
OF
INFORMATION.—The 
heads of departments, agencies, and offices with 
enforcement authorities under the Export Ad-
ministration Act of 1979, consistent with protec-
tion of law enforcement and its sources and
919 
† HR 5515 EAS 
methods, shall exchange any licensing and en-
forcement information with one another that is 
necessary to facilitate enforcement efforts under 
this section, and shall consult on a regular basis 
with one another and with the heads of other de-
partments, agencies, and offices that obtain in-
formation subject to this paragraph, in order to 
facilitate the exchange of such information. 
(B) PROVISION OF INFORMATION BY FED-
ERAL OFFICIALS.—Any Federal official who ob-
tains information that is relevant to the enforce-
ment of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 
including information pertaining to any inves-
tigation, shall furnish such information to each 
appropriate department, agency, or office with 
enforcement responsibilities under this section to 
the extent consistent with the protection of intel-
ligence, counterintelligence, and law enforcement 
sources, methods, and activities. 
(C) EXCEPTIONS.—The provisions of this 
paragraph shall not apply to information subject 
to the restrictions set forth in section 9 of title 
13, United States Code. Return information, as 
defined in section 6103(b) of the Internal Rev-
920 
† HR 5515 EAS 
enue Code of 1986, may be disclosed only as au-
thorized by that section. 
(D) INFORMATION SHARING WITH FEDERAL 
AGENCIES.—Licensing or enforcement informa-
tion obtained under the Export Administration 
Act of 1979 may be shared with heads of depart-
ments, agencies, and offices that do not have en-
forcement authorities under that Act on a case- 
by-case basis, at the discretion of the Secretary 
of Commerce. Such information may be shared 
only when the Secretary makes a determination 
that the sharing of the information is in the na-
tional interest. 
SEC. 1727. PROHIBITION ON MODIFICATION OF CIVIL PEN-
ALTIES UNDER EXPORT CONTROL AND SANC-
TIONS LAWS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, the Executive Office of the President may not 
modify any civil penalty, including a denial order, imple-
mented by the Government of the United States with respect 
to a Chinese telecommunications company pursuant to a 
determination that the company has violated an export con-
trol or sanctions law of the United States until the date 
that is 30 days after the President certifies to the appro-
priate congressional committees that the company—
921 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(1) has not, for a period of one year, conducted 
activities in violation of the laws of the United States; 
and 
(2) is fully cooperating with investigations into 
the activities of the company conducted by the Gov-
ernment of the United States, if any. 
(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1728. UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INDUS-
TRY AND SECURITY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, any reference in the Export Administra-
tion Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) or any other law 
or regulation to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Ex-
port Administration shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Secu-
rity.
922 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(b) TITLE 5.—Section 5314 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Under Secretary of Com-
merce for Export Administration’’ and inserting ‘‘Under 
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security’’. 
(c) CONTINUATION IN OFFICE.—The individual serv-
ing as Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Adminis-
tration on the day before the date of the enactment of this 
Act may serve as the Under Secretary of Commerce for In-
dustry and Security on and after that date without the need 
for renomination or reappointment. 
SEC. 1729. LIMITATION ON CANCELLATION OF DESIGNA-
TION OF SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AS 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
EXECUTIVE 
AGENT FOR A CERTAIN DEFENSE PRODUC-
TION ACT PROGRAM. 
(a) LIMITATION
ON CANCELLATION
OF DESIGNA-
TION.—The Secretary of Defense may not implement the de-
cision, issued on July 1, 2017, to cancel the designation, 
under Department of Defense Directive 4400.01E, entitled 
‘‘Defense Production Act Programs’’ and dated October 12, 
2001, of the Secretary of the Air Force as the Department 
of Defense Executive Agent for the program carried out 
under title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) until the date specified in subsection 
(c).
923 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(b) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force 
shall continue to serve as the sole and exclusive Department 
of Defense Executive Agent for the program described in 
subsection (a) until the date specified in subsection (c). 
(c) DATE SPECIFIED.—The date specified in this sub-
section is the date of the enactment of a joint resolution 
or an Act approving the implementation of the decision de-
scribed in subsection (a). 
SEC. 1730. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON CERTAIN DEFENSE 
TECHNOLOGIES CRITICAL TO THE UNITED 
STATES MAINTAINING SUPERIOR MILITARY 
CAPABILITIES. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in con-
sultation with the Air Force Research Laboratory, the De-
fense Advanced Projects Research Agency, and such other 
appropriate research entities as the Secretary and the Di-
rector may identify, shall— 
(1) jointly carry out and complete a review of 
key national security technology capability advan-
tages, competitions, and gaps between the United 
States and ‘‘near peer’’ nations; 
(2) develop a definition of ‘‘near peer nation’’ for 
purposes of paragraph (1); and
924 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(3) submit to the appropriate congressional com-
mittees a report on the findings of the Secretary and 
the Director with respect to the review conducted 
under paragraph (1). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The review conducted under para-
graph (1) of subsection (a), and the report required by 
paragraph (3) of that subsection, shall identify, at a min-
imum, the following: 
(1) Key United States industries and research 
and development activities expected to be critical to 
maintaining a national security technology capa-
bility if, during the 5-year period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary and 
the Director anticipate that— 
(A) a United States industrial base shortfall 
will exist; and 
(B) United States industry will be unable 
to or otherwise will not provide the needed ca-
pacity in a timely manner without financial as-
sistance from the United States Government 
through existing statutory authorities specifically 
intended for that purpose, including assistance 
provided under title III of the Defense Produc-
tion Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) and 
other appropriate authorities.
925 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(2) Key areas in which the United States cur-
rently enjoys a technological advantage. 
(3) Key areas in which the United States no 
longer enjoys a technological advantage. 
(4) Sectors of the defense industrial base in 
which the United States lacks adequate productive ca-
pacity to meet critical national defense needs. 
(5) Priority areas for which appropriate statu-
tory industrial base incentives should be applied as 
the most cost-effective, expedient, and practical alter-
native for meeting the technology or defense industrial 
base needs identified under this subsection, includ-
ing— 
(A) sustainment of critical production and 
supply chain capabilities; 
(B) commercialization of research and de-
velopment investments; 
(C) scaling of emerging technologies; and 
(D) other areas as determined by the Sec-
retary and the Director. 
(6) Priority funding recommendations with re-
spect to key areas that the Secretary, in consultation 
with the Director, determines are— 
(A) critical to the United States maintain-
ing superior military capabilities, especially
926 
† HR 5515 EAS 
with respect to potential peer and near peer 
military or economic competitors, during the 5- 
year period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act; and 
(B) suitable for long-term investment from 
funds made available under title III of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950 and other appro-
priate statutory authorities. 
(c) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by sub-
section (a)(3) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
may include a classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing and 
Urban Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and 
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; 
and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services, the 
Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Rep-
resentatives.
927 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 1731. BRIEFING ON INFORMATION FROM TRANS-
ACTIONS REVIEWED BY COMMITTEE ON FOR-
EIGN INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 
RELATING TO FOREIGN EFFORTS TO INFLU-
ENCE 
DEMOCRATIC 
INSTITUTIONS 
AND 
PROCESSES. 
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or a designee 
of the Secretary) shall provide a briefing to the Committee 
on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and 
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Rep-
resentatives on— 
(1) transactions reviewed by the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States during the 
5-year period preceding the briefing that the Com-
mittee determined would have allowed foreign persons 
to inappropriately influence democratic institutions 
and processes within the United States and in other 
countries; and 
(2) the disposition of such reviews, including 
any steps taken by the Committee to address the risk 
of allowing foreign persons to influence such institu-
tions and processes. 
SEC. 1732. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
(a) IMMEDIATE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVI-
SIONS.—The following shall take effect on the date of the
928 
† HR 5515 EAS 
enactment of this Act and apply with respect to any covered 
transaction the review or investigation of which is initiated 
under section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 
on or after such date of enactment: 
(1) Sections 1705, 1707, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1713, 
1714, 1715, 1716, 1717, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 
1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, and 1729 and 
the amendments made by those sections. 
(2) Section 1712 and the amendments made by 
that section (except for clause (iii) of section 
721(b)(4)(A) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, 
as added by section 1712). 
(3) Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)(A)(i), 
(5)(B)(i), (5)(B)(iv)(I), (5)(B)(v), (5)(C)(v), (6), (7), 
(8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), and 
(17) of subsection (a) of section 721 of the Defense 
Production Act of 1950, as amended by section 1703. 
(4) Section 721(m)(4) of the Defense Production 
Act of 1950, as amended by section 1718 (except for 
clauses (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v) of subparagraph (B) 
of that section). 
(b) DELAYED APPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN PROVI-
SIONS.—
929 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Any provision of or amend-
ment made by this title not specified in subsection (a) 
shall— 
(A) take effect on the date that is 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register of a de-
termination by the chairperson of the Committee 
on Foreign Investment in the United States that 
the regulations, organizational structure, per-
sonnel, and other resources necessary to admin-
ister the new provisions are in place; and 
(B) apply with respect to any covered 
transaction the review or investigation of which 
is initiated under section 721 of the Defense Pro-
duction Act of 1950 on or after the date de-
scribed in subparagraph (A). 
(2) NONDELEGATION OF DETERMINATION.—The 
determination of the chairperson of the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States under para-
graph (1)(A) may not be delegated. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION FOR PILOT PROGRAMS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and ending on the date de-
scribed in subsection (b)(1)(A), the Committee on For-
eign Investment in the United States may, at its dis-
cretion, conduct one or more pilot programs to imple-
930 
† HR 5515 EAS 
ment any authority provided pursuant to any provi-
sion of or amendment made by this title not specified 
in subsection (a). 
(2) PUBLICATION
IN
FEDERAL
REGISTER.—A 
pilot program may not commence until the date that 
is 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 
of a determination by the chairperson of the Com-
mittee of the scope of and procedures for the pilot pro-
gram. That determination may not be delegated. 
SEC. 1733. SEVERABILITY. 
If any provision of this title or an amendment made 
by this title, or the application of such a provision or 
amendment to any person or circumstance, is held to be 
invalid, the application of that provision or amendment to 
other persons or circumstances and the remainder of the 
provisions of this title and the amendments made by this 
title, shall not be affected thereby. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019’’.
931 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title 
XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, 
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program (and authorizations of appropriations there-
for) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2024. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 
Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated 
before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2024 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing
932 
† HR 5515 EAS 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2018; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2103(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Anniston Army Depot .......................................
$5,200,000 
California ..................
Fort Irwin ..........................................................
$29,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ........................................................
$77,000,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Gordon .......................................................
$99,000,000 
Hawaii .......................
Wheeler Army Airfield ......................................
$50,000,000 
Indiana ......................
Crane Army Ammunition Activity .................
$16,000,000 
Kentucky ....................
Fort Campbell ....................................................
$50,000,000 
Fort Knox ..........................................................
$26,000,000 
New Jersey .................
Picatinny Arsenal .............................................
$41,000,000 
New Mexico ................
White Sands Missile Range ..............................
$40,000,000
933 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Army: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
New York ....................
West Point Military Reservation .....................
$160,000,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg .........................................................
$10,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ...........................................................
$24,000,000 
Fort Hood ..........................................................
$9,600,000 
Virginia .....................
Arlington National Cemetery Southern Ex-
pansion ...........................................................
$30,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany .......................
East Camp Grafenwoehr ................................
$31,000,000 
Honduras ......................
Soto Cano Air Base ........................................
$21,000,000 
Korea .............................
Camp Tango ...................................................
$17,500,000 
Kuwait ..........................
Camp Arifjan ..................................................
$44,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations,
934 
† HR 5515 EAS 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Coun-
try 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Italy ................
Vicenza .......................................
Family Housing 
New Construc-
tion.
$95,134,000 
Korea ..............
Camp Walker .............................
Family Housing 
Replacement 
Construction.
$68,000,000 
Puerto Rico ....
Fort Buchanan ..........................
Family Housing 
Replacement 
Construction.
$26,000,000 
Wisconsin 
Fort McCoy ................................
Family Housing 
New Construc-
tion.
$6,200,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $18,326,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Army as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
935 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 Stat. 3670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2020, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California
Military Ocean Ter-
minal, Concord.
Access Control Point ..
$9,900,000 
Japan ........
Kadena Air Base .......
Missile Magazine ........
$10,600,000
936 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2105. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1145) 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (129 Stat. 1146), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2023, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2024, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2016 Project Authorization 
Virginia ...............................
Arlington Cemetery (DAR) .....................
$60,000,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
937 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Camp Navajo ......................................................
$14,800,000 
California .................
Camp Pendleton .................................................
$199,630,000 
Coronado .............................................................
$77,780,000 
Lemoore ...............................................................
$112,690,000 
Miramar ..............................................................
$31,980,000 
Point Mugu .........................................................
$22,150,000 
San Diego ...........................................................
$156,540,000 
San Nicolas Island .............................................
$31,010,000 
Seal Beach ..........................................................
$139,630,000 
District of Columbia 
Naval Observatory ..............................................
$115,600,000 
Florida ......................
Mayport ...............................................................
$111,460,000 
Naval Air Station Whiting Field .....................
$10,000,000 
Georgia ......................
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany ...............
$31,900,000 
Hawaii ......................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ....................
$45,000,000 
Kaneohe Bay .......................................................
$66,100,000 
Pearl City ...........................................................
$78,320,000 
Maine ........................
Kittery .................................................................
$149,685,000 
Mississippi ................
Naval Construction Battalion Center ...............
$22,300,000 
North Carolina .........
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ..........
$240,830,000 
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$51,300,000 
Pennsylvania ............
Philadelphia ........................................................
$71,050,000 
South Carolina .........
Beaufort ...............................................................
$15,817,000 
Parris Island ......................................................
$35,190,000 
Utah ..........................
Hill Air Force Base ...........................................
$105,520,000 
Virginia ....................
Portsmouth ..........................................................
$26,120,000 
Quantico ..............................................................
$13,100,000 
Washington ...............
Bangor .................................................................
$88,960,000 
Whidbey Island ...................................................
$27,380,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahamas ......................
Andros Island ....................................................
$31,050,000 
Bahrain Island ............
SW Asia .............................................................
$26,340,000 
Cuba .............................
Guantanamo Bay ..............................................
$85,000,000 
Germany ......................
Panzer Kaserne .................................................
$43,950,000 
Guam ............................
Joint Region Marianas .....................................
$279,657,000
938 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Navy: Outside the United States—Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Japan ...........................
Kadena Air Base ...............................................
$9,049,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installation or location, 
in the number of units, and in the amount set forth in the 
following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
State 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Guam ..............
Joint Region Marianas ............
Replace Andersen 
Housing PH 
III.
$83,441,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $4,502,000.
939 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $16,638,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
940 
† HR 5515 EAS 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................................
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$63,800,000 
Arizona ...................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .......
$15,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .........................
$40,000,000 
Florida ....................................
Eglin Air Force Base .......................
$62,863,000 
MacDill Air Force Base ...................
$3,100,000 
Maryland ................................
Joint Base Andrews ..........................
$50,000,000 
Massachusetts .........................
Hanscom Air Force Base .................
$225,000,000 
Nebraska .................................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$9,500,000 
Nevada ....................................
Creech Air Force Base ......................
$59,000,000 
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$5,900,000 
New Mexico ............................
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$85,000,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$7,000,000 
New York ................................
Rome Lab ..........................................
$14,200,000 
North Dakota ........................
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$66,000,000 
Ohio ........................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ....
$116,100,000 
Oklahoma ...............................
Altus Air Force Base ........................
$12,000,000 
Tinker Air Force Base ......................
$166,000,000 
South Carolina ......................
Shaw Air Force Base ........................
$53,000,000 
Utah ........................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$26,000,000 
Washington .............................
White Bluff ........................................
$14,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
941 
† HR 5515 EAS 
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ......................................
Joint Region Marianas ....................
$9,800,000 
Mariana Islands-Tinian .......
Tinian ................................................
$50,700,000 
Qatar ......................................
Al Udeid ............................................
$70,400,000 
United Kingdom ....................
RAF Lakenheath ...............................
$148,467,000 
Worldwide Classified .............
Classified Location ...........................
$18,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construc-
tion or improvement of family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the
942 
† HR 5515 EAS 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $75,247,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN PHASED PROJECT AUTHORIZED IN 
FISCAL YEARS 2015, 2016, AND 2017. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law
944 
† HR 5515 EAS 
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 
115–91; 131 Stat. 1825) for the United States Air Force 
Academy, Colorado, for construction of a cyberworks facil-
ity, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a facility 
of up to 4,462 square meters that includes two real property 
gifts of construction of 929 and 465 square meters if such 
gift is accepted by the Secretary in accordance with section 
2601 of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 2308. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may carry out military construction projects to 
construct— 
(1) a 6,702 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia, in the amount of $43,000,000; 
(2) a 4,833 square meter Cyberspace Test Facil-
ity at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in the amount 
of $38,000,000; and 
(3) a 4,735 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 
in the amount of $30,000,000. 
(b) USE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 
EVALUATION FUNDS.—As provided for in the Defense Lab-
oratory Modernization Pilot Program authorized by section
945 
† HR 5515 EAS 
2803 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1169), the 
Secretary may use funds available for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation for the projects described in sub-
section (a). 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .........................
Clear Air Force Station .....................................
$174,000,000 
Fort Greely ..........................................................
$8,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ....................
$14,000,000 
Arkansas .....................
Little Rock Air Force Base ................................
$14,000,000 
California ...................
Camp Pendleton .................................................
$12,596,000 
Coronado .............................................................
$71,088,000 
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ....................
$18,800,000 
Colorado ......................
Fort Carson .........................................................
$24,297,000 
CONUS Classified .....
Classified Location .............................................
$49,222,000 
Kentucky ...................
Fort Campbell .....................................................
$82,298,000 
Maine ..........................
Kittery .................................................................
$11,600,000 
Maryland ....................
Fort Meade ..........................................................
$805,000,000 
Missouri ......................
St. Louis ..............................................................
$447,800,000 
New Jersey ..................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ..................
$10,200,000 
North Carolina .........
Fort Bragg ..........................................................
$32,366,000
946 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
New River ............................................................
$32,580,000 
Oklahoma ....................
McAlester .............................................................
$7,000,000 
Texas ...........................
Joint Base San Antonio ....................................
$10,200,000 
Red River Army Depot ......................................
$71,500,000 
Virginia ......................
Dam Neck ............................................................
$8,959,000 
Fort A.P. Hill .....................................................
$11,734,000 
Fort Belvoir ........................................................
$6,127,000 
Humphreys Engineer Center .............................
$20,257,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ................................
$12,700,000 
Pentagon ..............................................................
$35,850,000 
Washington ...............
Joint Base Lewis-McChord ................................
$26,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium ................
U.S. Army Garrison Benelux (Chievres) ..........
$14,305,000 
Cuba ......................
Guantanamo Bay ...............................................
$9,080,000 
Djibouti .................
Camp Lemonnier ................................................
$3,750,000 
Germany ...............
Baumholder .........................................................
$11,504,000 
Kaiserslautern Air Base .....................................
$99,955,000 
Weisbaden ............................................................
$56,048,000 
Greece ....................
NSA Souda Bay .................................................
$2,230,000 
Guam ...................
Naval Base Guam ...............................................
$4,634,000 
NSA Naples .........................................................
$990,000 
Japan ....................
Camp McTureous ................................................
$94,851,000 
Iwakuni ...............................................................
$33,200,000 
Kadena Air Base ................................................
$21,400,000 
Yokosuka ..............................................................
$170,386,000 
Unspecified World-
wide ...................
Unspecified ..........................................................
$15,693,000
947 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2402. ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION IN-
VESTMENT PROGRAM. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available 
for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 
outside the United States, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Anniston Army Depot ........................................
$20,000,000 
California ...................
Naval Base Ventura County ..............................
$6,530,000 
Colorado ......................
Schriever Air Force Base ...................................
$4,044,000 
Florida ........................
MacDill Air Force Base .....................................
$3,700,000 
Hawaii ........................
Bellows Air Force Base ......................................
$2,944,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .....................
$4,500,000 
Idaho ...........................
Mountain Home Air Force Base .......................
$5,980,000 
Indiana .......................
NSA Crane ..........................................................
$6,890,000 
Kansas ........................
Salina Training Center .....................................
$3,500,000 
Louisiana ...................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New 
Orleans ............................................................
$5,340,000 
Maryland ....................
NSA Bethesda .....................................................
$22,000,000 
New Mexico .................
Kirtland Air Force Base ....................................
$462,000 
Ohio .............................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ......................
$7,900,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Fort Indiantown Gap ........................................
$2,150,000 
South Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort .................
$22,402,000 
Texas ...........................
Camp Mabry .......................................................
$5,500,000 
Sheppard Air Force Base ..................................
$9,404,000 
Virginia ......................
Naval Air Station Oceana .................................
$2,520,000 
NRO Headquarters .............................................
$571,000 
Washington ...............
Naval Base Kitsap .............................................
$1,790,000 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction,
948 
† HR 5515 EAS 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of Defense (other than the military depart-
ments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2401 of that Act (128 Stat. 3681), 
and amended by section 2406 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1831), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2019, or the date of the enactment of an 
Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2020, whichever is later.
949 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Japan .................
Commander Fleet Activi-
ties Sasebo ...................
E.J. King High 
School Replace-
ment/Renovation.
$37,681,000 
Okinawa ..........................
Kubasaki High School 
Replacement/Ren-
ovation.
$99,420,000 
New Mexico ........
Cannon Air Force Base ..
SOF Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
(STS).
$23,333,000 
Virginia .............
Pentagon ..........................
Redundant Chilled 
Water Loop.
$15,100,000 
SEC. 2405. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 
PROJECT. 
The table in section 2401(a) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 105–91) is amended by inserting after the item re-
lating to South Carolina the following new item: 
Texas ................................
Fort Bliss Blood Processing 
Center ................................
$8,300,000
951 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Subtitle B—Host Country In-kind 
Contributions 
SEC. 2511. REPUBLIC OF KOREA FUNDED CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for 
required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense 
may accept military construction projects for the installa-
tions or locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects 
Country 
Compo-
nent 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Korea .........
Army .........
Camp Carroll
Upgrade Electrical 
Distribution, Phase 
2 ...............................
$52,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Site Development ........
$7,800,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Air Support Oper-
ations Squadron .....
$25,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Unaccompanied En-
listed Personnel 
Housing, P2 ............
$76,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Echelon Above Brigade 
Engineer Battalion, 
VMF .........................
$123,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Walker
Repair/ Replace Sewer 
Piping System ........
$8,000,000 
Navy ..........
Chinhae ..........
Indoor Training Pool
$7,400,000 
Navy ..........
Pohang Air 
Base ............
Replace Ordnance 
Storage Magazines ..
$87,000,000 
Air Force ...
Gimhae Air 
Base ............
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Warehouse .......
$7,600,000 
Air Force ...
Gwangju Air 
Base ............
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Warehouse .......
$7,600,000 
Air Force ...
Kunsan Air 
Base ............
Explosive Ordnance 
Disposal Facility ....
$8,000,000 
Air Force ...
Kunsan Air 
Base ............
Upgrade Flow- 
Through Fuel Sys-
tem ...........................
$23,000,000 
Air Force ...
Osan Air Base 
5th Recon-naissance 
Squadron Aircraft 
Shelter .....................
$12,000,000
952 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects—Continued 
Country 
Compo-
nent 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Air Force ...
Osan Air Base 
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Facility ...........
$22,000,000 
Air Force ...
Osan Air Base 
Commun-ications HQ 
Building ..................
$45,000,000 
Air Force ...
Suwon Air 
Base ............
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Warehouse .......
$7,200,000 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations 
and Authorization of Appropria-
tions 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alaska .........................
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ...................
$27,000,000 
Illinois ........................
Marseilles ...........................................................
$5,000,000 
Montana .....................
Malta ..................................................................
$15,000,000 
Nevada .......................
North Las Vegas ................................................
$32,000,000 
New Hampshire .........
Pembroke ............................................................
$12,000,000 
North Dakota .............
Fargo ..................................................................
$32,000,000 
Ohio ............................
Camp Ravenna ..................................................
$7,400,000
953 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Army National Guard—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Oklahoma ...................
Lexington ...........................................................
$11,000,000 
Oregon ........................
Boardman ..........................................................
$11,000,000 
South Dakota .............
Rapid City .........................................................
$15,000,000 
Texas ..........................
Houston ..............................................................
$15,000,000 
Virginia .....................
Sandston ............................................................
$89,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Barstow .....................................................
$34,000,000 
Wisconsin ............................
Fort McCoy ...............................................
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
954 
† HR 5515 EAS 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Seal Beach ................................................
$21,740,000 
Georgia ................................
Benning ....................................................
$13,630,000 
Pennsylvania ......................
Pittsburgh .................................................
$17,650,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Channel Islands Air National Guard 
Station.
$8,000,000 
Hawaii ................................
Joint Base Peal Harbor-Hickam ............
$17,000,000 
Illinois .................................
General Wayne A. Downing Peoria 
International Airport.
$9,000,000 
Louisiana ............................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base 
New Orleans.
$15,000,000 
New York .............................
Francis S. Gabreski Airport ...................
$20,000,000 
Pennsylvania ......................
Fort Indiantown Gap ..............................
$8,000,000 
Puerto Rico .........................
Luis Munoz Marin International Air-
port.
$50,000,000 
Virginia ...............................
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ......................
$10,000,000
955 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Indiana ..............................
Grissom Air Reserve Base .......................
$21,500,000 
Minnesota ............................
St. Paul International Airport ...............
$9,000,000 
Mississippi ..........................
Keesler Air Force Base ............................
$4,550,000 
New York .............................
Niagara Falls International Airport .....
$14,000,000 
Texas ....................................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base 
Fort Worth.
$3,100,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for the costs 
of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and 
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, 
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 
of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601.
956 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Subtitle B—Other Matters 
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114– 
92; 129 Stat. 1164) for construction of a Reserve Training 
Center Complex at Dam Neck, Virginia, the Secretary of 
the Navy may construct the Reserve Training Center Com-
plex at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story, Vir-
ginia. 
SEC. 2612. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115– 
91; 131 Stat. 1834) for Fort Belvoir, Virginia, for additions 
and alterations to the National Guard Readiness Center, 
the Secretary of the Army may construct a new readiness 
center. If a new readiness center is constructed, no funds 
above the previously authorized $15,000,000 may be made 
available for such purpose.
957 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2613. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the 
Navy may carry out a military construction project to con-
struct a 50,000 square foot reserve training center, 6,600 
square foot combat vehicle maintenance and storage facility, 
2,400 square foot vehicle wash rack, 1,600 square foot cov-
ered training area, road improvements, and associated sup-
porting facilities, and may acquire approximately 8.5 acres 
of adjacent land and obtain necessary interest in land at 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the amount of $17,650,000. 
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR NAVY MILI-
TARY CONSTRUCTION RESERVE FUNDS.—The Secretary 
may use available, unobligated Navy military construction 
reserve funds for the project described in subsection (a). 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of 
the Navy shall provide information in accordance with sec-
tion 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the 
project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary 
to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall uti-
lize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title re-
garding authorized cost and scope of work variations.
958 
† HR 5515 EAS 
TITLE 
XXVII—BASE 
REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
REALIGNMENT 
AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for base re-
alignment and closure activities, including real property 
acquisition and military construction projects, as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 
U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of 
Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 
of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as speci-
fied in the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2702. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) 
ROUND. 
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an 
additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.
959 
† HR 5515 EAS 
TITLE 
XXVIII—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
GENERAL 
PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction 
Program and Military Family 
Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN ARCHITEC-
TURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND 
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR DEFENSE LAB-
ORATORY MODERNIZATION PILOT PROGRAM. 
Section 2803 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 
1169; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection 
(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (e)’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘, site prep-
aration, and advance planning and design’’ and in-
serting ‘‘and site preparation’’; 
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘subsection 
(c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(1)’’; 
(4) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and 
(f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively; 
(5) by inserting after subsection (b) the following 
new subsection:
960 
† HR 5515 EAS 
‘‘(c) ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 
AND
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated or otherwise made available to the military depart-
ments for research, development, test, and evaluation, the 
Secretary of the military department concerned may obtain 
architectural and engineering services and carry out con-
struction design in connection with a military construction 
project described in subsection (a). This authority is not 
subject to the condition in subsection (b).’’; 
(6) in subsection (d), as redesignated by para-
graph (4)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end 
the following: ‘‘This requirement does not include 
architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design under subsection (c).’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘other 
than funds used pursuant to subsection (c)’’ after 
‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 
(7) in subsection (g), as redesignated by para-
graph (4), by striking ‘‘2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2025’’.
961 
† HR 5515 EAS 
SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR 
ACQUISITION, 
CONSTRUCTION, 
OR 
FUR-
NISHING OF TEST FACILITIES AND EQUIP-
MENT. 
Section 2353(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by inserting after the first sentence the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The acquisition or construction of these re-
search, developmental, or test facilities shall be subject 
to the cost principles applicable to allowable contract 
expenses.’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The ac-
quisition or construction of facilities under the au-
thority of this section shall not be governed by sec-
tions 2802, 2805, or 2811 of this title and their asso-
ciated implementing regulations. The Secretary of De-
fense and the Secretaries of the military departments 
shall promulgate regulations necessary to give full 
force and effect to this section.’’. 
SEC. 2803. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHOR-
ITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN 
CERTAIN 
AREAS 
OUTSIDE 
THE 
UNITED 
STATES. 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of sec-
tion 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
962 
† HR 5515 EAS 
for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 
117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91), is further 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘December 31, 
2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2019’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 
2019’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2020’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection 
(c)(1) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$50,000,000’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘October 1, 2017’’ and inserting 
‘‘October 1, 2018’’; 
(3) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2018’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘December 31, 2019’’; and 
(4) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2019’’ and inserting 
‘‘fiscal year 2020’’. 
SEC. 2804. UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS 
RELATED 
TO 
REVITALIZATION 
AND RECAPITALIZATION OF DEFENSE INDUS-
TRIAL BASE FACILITIES. 
Section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed by adding at the end the following new subsection:
963 
† HR 5515 EAS 
‘‘(g) DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE FACILITY REVITAL-
IZATION.—(1) For the revitalization and recapitalization 
of Defense Industrial Base Facilities owned by the United 
States and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary con-
cerned, the Secretary concerned may obligate and expend— 
‘‘(A) from appropriations available to the Sec-
retary concerned for operation and maintenance, 
amounts necessary to carry out an unspecified minor 
military construction project costing not more than 
$6,000,000, notwithstanding subsection (c); or 
‘‘(B) from appropriations available to the Sec-
retary concerned for military construction not other-
wise authorized by law or from funds authorized to 
be made available section 2363(a) of this title, 
amounts necessary to carry out an unspecified minor 
military construction project costing not more than 
$6,000,000. 
‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, an unspecified 
minor military construction project is a military construc-
tion project that (notwithstanding subsection (a)) has an 
approved cost equal to or less than $6,000,000. 
‘‘(3) If the Secretary concerned makes a decision to 
carry out an unspecified minor military construction 
project to which this subsection applies, the Secretary con-
cerned shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress
964 
† HR 5515 EAS 
of that decision, of the justification for the project, and of 
the estimated cost of the project. The project may then be 
carried out only after the end of the 14-day period begin-
ning on the date the notification is received by the commit-
tees in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of 
this title. 
‘‘(4) In this section, the term ‘defense industrial base 
facility’ means any Department of Defense depot, arsenal, 
shipyard, or plant located within the United States. 
‘‘(5) The authority to carry out a project under this 
subsection expires on September 30, 2023.’’. 
SEC. 2805. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF PROJECTS CAR-
RIED OUT PURSUANT TO LAWS OTHER THAN 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION 
ACTS. 
Section 2802(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Secretary concerned shall—’’ 
and all that follows through ‘‘comply with the con-
gressional notification requirement’’ and inserting 
‘‘Secretary concerned shall comply with the congres-
sional notification requirement’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘and submit to the congressional 
defense committees any materials required to be sub-
mitted to Congress or any other congressional com-
965 
† HR 5515 EAS 
mittees pursuant to the congressional notification re-
quirement’’ after ‘‘road project will be carried out’’. 
Subtitle B—Project Management 
and Oversight Reforms 
SEC. 2811. UPDATES AND MODIFICATIONS TO DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE FORM 1391, UNIFIED FACILITIES 
CRITERIA, 
AND 
MILITARY 
INSTALLATION 
MASTER PLANS. 
(a) FLOOD RISK DISCLOSURE FOR MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
modify Department of Defense Form 1391 to require, 
with respect to any proposed major or minor military 
construction project requiring congressional notifica-
tion or approval— 
(A) disclosure whether a proposed project 
will be sited within or partially within a 100- 
year floodplain, according to the most recent 
available Federal Emergency Management Agen-
cy flood hazard data; and 
(B) if the proposed project will be sited 
within or partially within a 100-year floodplain, 
the specific risk mitigation plan. 
(2) DELINEATION OF FLOODPLAIN.—To the ex-
tent that Federal Emergency Management Agency
966 
† HR 5515 EAS 
flood hazard data are not available for a proposed 
major or minor military construction site, the Sec-
retary concerned shall establish a process for delin-
eating the 100-year floodplain using risk analysis 
that is consistent with the standards used to inform 
Federal flood risk assessments. 
(3) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—For proposed 
projects that are to be sited within or partially within 
a 100-year floodplain, the Secretary concerned shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port with the following: 
(A) An assessment of flood vulnerability for 
the proposed project. 
(B) Any information concerning alternative 
construction sites that were considered, and an 
explanation of why those sites do not satisfy mis-
sion requirements. 
(C) A description of planned flood mitiga-
tion measures. 
(4) MINIMUM
FLOOD
MITIGATION
REQUIRE-
MENTS.—When mitigating the flood risk of a major or 
minor military construction project within or par-
tially within the 100-year floodplain, the Secretary 
concerned shall require any mitigation plan to as-
sume an additional—
967 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(A) 2 feet above the base flood elevation for 
non-mission critical buildings, as determined by 
the Secretary; and 
(B) 3 feet above the base flood elevation for 
mission-critical buildings, as determined by the 
Secretary. 
(b) DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE FORM 1391.—Not later than 30 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of De-
fense shall amend Department of Defense Form 1391 to re-
quire, for each requested military construction project— 
(1) disclosure whether the project was included 
in the prior year’s future-years defense program sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to section 221 of title 10, 
United States Code; and 
(2) inclusion of an energy study or life cycle 
analysis. 
(c) INCORPORATION OF CHANGING ENVIRONMENTAL 
CONDITION PROJECTIONS IN MILITARY CONSTRUCTION DE-
SIGNS AND MODIFICATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of De-
fense shall amend section 3–5.6.2.3 of United Facilities Cri-
teria (UFC) 2–100–01 and UFC 2–100–02 (or any similar 
successor regulations) to provide that in order to anticipate 
changing environmental conditions during the design life
968 
† HR 5515 EAS 
of existing or planned new facilities and infrastructure, 
projections from reliable and authorized sources such as the 
Census Bureau (for population projections), the National 
Academies of Sciences (for land use change projections and 
climate projections), the U.S. Geological Survey (for land 
use change projections), and the U.S. Global Change Re-
search Office and National Climate Assessment (for climate 
projections) shall be considered and incorporated into mili-
tary construction designs and modifications. 
(d) INCLUSION OF CONSIDERATION OF ENERGY AND 
CLIMATE RESILIENCY EFFORTS IN MASTER PLANS FOR 
MAJOR MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.—Section 2864 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 
at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the 
period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) energy and climate resiliency efforts.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The term ‘energy and climate resiliency’ 
means anticipation, preparation for, and adaptation
969 
† HR 5515 EAS 
to utility disruptions and changing environmental 
conditions and the ability to withstand, respond to, 
and recover rapidly from utility disruptions while en-
suring the sustainment of mission-critical oper-
ations.’’. 
(e) DEFINITION OF MILITARY INSTALLATION RESIL-
IENCE.—Section 101(e) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(8) MILITARY INSTALLATION RESILIENCE.—The 
term ‘military installation resilience’ means the capa-
bility of a military installation to avoid, prepare for, 
minimize the effect of, adapt to, and recover from ex-
treme weather events, or from anticipated or unan-
ticipated changes in environmental conditions, that 
do, or have the potential to, adversely affect the mili-
tary 
installation 
or 
essential 
transportation, 
logistical, or other necessary resources outside of the 
military installation that are necessary in order to 
maintain, improve, or rapidly reestablish installation 
mission assurance and mission-essential functions.’’. 
(f) ADJUSTMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION ASSISTANCE 
FOR RESPONDING TO THREATS TO THE RESILIENCE OF A 
MILITARY INSTALLATION.—Section 2391(b)(1) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended—
970 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(1) by striking ‘‘, or (E) by the closure’’ and in-
serting ‘‘, (E) by threats to military installation resil-
ience, or (F) by the closure’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘(A), (B), (C), or (E)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘(A), (B), (C), or (F)’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘action described in clause (D), 
if the Secretary determines that the encroachment of 
the civilian community’’ and inserting ‘‘action de-
scribed in clause (D) or (E), if the Secretary deter-
mines that either the encroachment of the civilian 
community or threats to military installation resil-
ience’’. 
SEC. 2812. WORK IN PROCESS CURVE CHARTS AND OUTLAY 
TABLES 
FOR 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) REQUIRED SUBMISSIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 169 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by insert-
ing after section 2864 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2865. Work in Process Curve charts and outlay ta-
bles required for military construction 
projects 
‘‘Along with the budget for each fiscal year submitted 
by the President pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, 
United States Code, the Secretary of Defense and the Secre-
971 
† HR 5515 EAS 
taries of the military departments shall include for any 
military construction project over $35,000,000, as an ad-
dendum to be included within the same document as the 
1391s for the Military Construction Program budget docu-
mentation, a Project Spending Plan that includes— 
‘‘(1) a Work in Process Curve chart to identify 
funding, obligations, and outlay figures; and 
‘‘(2) a monthly outlay table for funding, obliga-
tions, and outlay figures.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of such subchapter is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 2864 the 
following new item: 
‘‘2865. Work in Process Curve charts and outlay tables required for military con-
struction projects.’’. 
(b) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GUIDANCE.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Under Sec-
retary of Defense (Comptroller), update Department of De-
fense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14–R, and 
any other appropriate instructions and guidance, to ensure 
that the Department of Defense takes appropriate actions 
to comply with section 2865 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by this section.
972 
† HR 5515 EAS 
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances 
SEC. 2821. LAND EXCHANGE, AIR FORCE PLANT 44, TUCSON, 
ARIZONA. 
(a) LAND CONVEYANCE AND RESTORATION OF REAL 
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED.—In connection 
with a project planned by the Tuscon Airport Authority 
(in this section referred to as ‘‘TAA’’) to relocate and extend 
a parallel runway and make other airfield safety enhance-
ments at the Tucson International Airport, the Secretary 
of the Air Force (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Sec-
retary’’) may— 
(1) convey to TAA all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to all or any part of a par-
cel of real property, including any improvements 
thereon, consisting of approximately 58 acres on Air 
Force Plant 44, Arizona, and located adjacent to Tuc-
son International Airport; 
(2) agree to terminate all or a portion of any 
deed restrictions made for the benefit of the United 
States that limit construction on Tucson Inter-
national Airport within 750 feet of the Airport’s 
southwest property boundary with Air Force Plant 
44; and 
(3) using cash or in-kind consideration as pro-
vided in subsection (b)—
973 
† HR 5515 EAS 
(A) construct new explosives storage facili-
ties to replace the explosives storage facilities lo-
cated on the land described in paragraph (1) 
and explosives storage facilities located on Air 
Force Plant 44 within the end-of-runway clear 
zone associated with the TAA airfield enhance-
ment project; and 
(B) construct new fencing as necessary to 
accommodate the changes in the boundary of Air 
Force Plant 44. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the land 
conveyance, deed restriction termination, replacement of 
real property improvements, and installation of fencing au-
thorized under subsection (a), the following consideration 
must be received by the United States before the Secretary 
may make any conveyance or termination of real property 
interests of the United States as described in subsection (a): 
(1) All right, title, and interest of the owner or 
owners thereof to the parcels of real property con-
sisting of approximately 160 acres directly adjacent 
to the south boundary of Air Force Plant 44. 
(2) The cost to the Secretary, in accordance with 
current design standards, of— 
(A) replacing the real property structures 
on Air Force Plant 44 made unusable due to the
974 
† HR 5515 EAS 
land transfers and termination of deed restric-
tions, with structures of at least equivalent ca-
pacity and functionality; and 
(B) installing the necessary boundary fenc-
ing due to the changes in the boundary of Air 
Force Plant 44. 
(c) DIRECT PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION TO GOVERN-
MENT CONTRACTORS.—The Secretary may require that any 
cash consideration to be received under this section be paid, 
directly or through the Air Force design and construction 
agent, to the contractors performing design or construction 
of the real property improvements described in subsection 
(a)(3). 
(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— 
(1) PAYMENT
REQUIRED.—The Secretary may 
require TAA to cover costs to be incurred by the Sec-
retary to carry out the land exchange and other 
transactions authorized under this section, or to reim-
burse the Secretary for such costs, including survey 
costs, appraisal costs, costs related to environmental 
documentation, and other administrative costs related 
to the conveyances. If amounts are collected from TAA 
in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, 
and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually in-
curred by the Secretary to carry out such trans-
975 
† HR 5515 EAS 
actions, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount 
to TAA. 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received as reimbursements under para-
graph (1) shall be used in accordance with section 
2695(c) of title 10, United States Code. 
(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 
and legal description of the real property to be exchanged 
under this section shall be determined by a survey satisfac-
tory to the Secretary. 
(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions 
in connection with the land exchange and other trans-
actions under this section as the Secretary considers appro-
priate to protect the interests of the United States. Without 
limiting the foregoing, the Secretary may establish a deed 
restriction on any part of the 58 acres described in sub-
section (a)(1) to accommodate existing Quantity Distance 
arcs. 
SEC. 2822. LAND CONVEYANCE, EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, 
FLORIDA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the Air 
Force Enlisted Village, a nonprofit corporation (in this sec-
tion referred to as the ‘‘Village’’), all right, title, and inter-
976 
† HR 5515 EAS 
est of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, 
including improvements thereon, consisting of approxi-
mately 80 acres located adjacent to Eglin Air Force Base, 
Florida, for the purpose of independent-living and assisted- 
living apartments for veterans. The conveyance under this 
subsection is subject to valid existing rights. 
(b) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary deter-
mines at any time that the real property conveyed under 
subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the pur-
pose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all right, 
title, and interest in and to such real property, including 
any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Sec-
retary, revert to and become the property of the United 
States, and the United States shall have the right of imme-
diate entry onto such real property. A determination by the 
Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record 
after an opportunity for a hearing. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) PAYMENT
REQUIRED.—The Secretary may 
require the Village to cover all costs (except costs for 
environmental remediation of the property) to be in-
curred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary 
for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the 
conveyance under this section, including survey costs, 
costs for environmental documentation, and any other