†
468
HR 1815 EAS
files or portions thereof and the potential for declassifying
a significant part of the information contained therein.
‘‘(3) A complainant that alleges that the Defense Intel-
ligence Agency has improperly withheld records because of
failure to comply with this subsection may seek judicial re-
view in the district court of the United States of the district
in which any of the parties reside, or in the District of
Columbia. In such a proceeding, the court’s review shall be
limited to determining the following:
‘‘(A) Whether the Defense Intelligence Agency has
conducted the review required by paragraph (1) before
the expiration of the 10-year period beginning on the
date of the enactment of this section or before the ex-
piration of the 10-year period beginning on the date
of the most recent review.
‘‘(B) Whether the Defense Intelligence Agency, in
fact, considered the criteria set forth in paragraph (2)
in conducting the required review.’’.
(2) The table of contents for that Act is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 704 the following
new item:
‘‘Sec. 705. Operational files of the Defense Intelligence Agency.’’.
(b) SEARCH AND REVIEW OF CERTAIN OTHER OPER-
ATIONAL FILES.—The National Security Act of 1947 is fur-
ther amended—
†
469
HR 1815 EAS
(1) 
in 
section 
702(a)(3)(C) 
(50 
U.S.C.
432(a)(3)(C)), by adding the following new clause:
‘‘(vi) The Office of the Inspector General of
the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.’’;
(2) 
in 
section 
703(a)(3)(C) 
(50 
U.S.C.
432a(a)(3)(C)), by adding at the end the following
new clause:
‘‘(vii) The Office of the Inspector General of
the NRO.’’; and
(3) in section 704(c)(3) (50 U.S.C. 432b(c)(3)),
by adding at the end the following subparagraph:
‘‘(H) The Office of the Inspector General of
the National Security Agency.’’.
SEC. 923. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN
ORDERS AND GUIDANCE ON FUNCTIONS AND
DUTIES OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL AND THE
JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE AIR
FORCE.
No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
may be obligated or expended to implement or enforce either
of the following:
(1) The order of the Secretary of the Air Force
dated May 15, 2003, and entitled ‘‘Functions and
Duties of the General Counsel and the Judge Advocate
General’’.
†
470
HR 1815 EAS
(2) Any internal operating instruction or memo-
randum issued by the General Counsel of the Depart-
ment of the Air Force in reliance upon the order re-
ferred to in paragraph (1).
SEC. 924. UNITED STATES MILITARY CANCER INSTITUTE.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Chapter 104 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new section:
‘‘§ 2117. United States Military Cancer Institute
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—(1) There is a United States
Military Cancer Institute in the University. The Director
of the United States Military Cancer Institute is the head
of the Institute.
‘‘(2) The Institute is composed of clinical and basic
scientists in the Department of Defense who have an exper-
tise in research, patient care, and education relating to on-
cology and who meet applicable criteria for participation
in the Institute.
‘‘(3) The components of the Institute include military
treatment and research facilities that meet applicable cri-
teria and are designated as affiliates of the Institute.
‘‘(b) RESEARCH.—(1) The Director of the United
States Military Cancer Institute shall carry out research
studies on the following: