datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
IB
Union Calendar No. 293
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4246
[Report No. 103–526]
To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1995 for the operation and
maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 19, 1994
Mr. TAUZIN (for himself and Mr. STUDDS) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries
MAY 24, 1994
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1995 for the oper-
ation and maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Panama Canal Com-
mission Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1995’’.
HR 4246 RH
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES.
(a) OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, 
AND
IMPROVE-
MENT.—Except as specified in subsection (b), the Panama
Canal Commission is authorized to make such expendi-
tures within the limits of funds and borrowing authority
available to it in accordance with law, and to make such
contracts and commitments, without regard to fiscal year
limitations, and to be derived from the Panama Canal Re-
volving Fund, as may be necessary under the Panama
Canal Act of 1979 (22 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), for the oper-
ation, maintenance, and improvement of the Panama
Canal for fiscal year 1995.
(b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—For fiscal year
1995, the Panama Canal Commission is authorized to
make expenditures from the Panama Canal Revolving
Fund for administrative expenses, not to exceed
$50,030,000, including—
(1) not to exceed $11,000 for official reception
and representation expenses of the Board of the
Commission;
(2) not to exceed $5,000 for official reception
and representation expenses of the Secretary of De-
fense; and
(3) not to exceed $30,000 for official reception
and representation expenses of the Administrator of
the Commission.
HR 4246 RH
(c) MOTOR VEHICLES.—Funds available to the Pan-
ama Canal Commission shall be available for the purchase
of not to exceed 43 passenger motor vehicles for replace-
ment only (including large heavy-duty vehicles used to
transport Commission personnel across the Isthmus of
Panama), the purchase price of which shall not exceed
$19,500 per vehicle. These vehicles must be manufactured
in the United States of America.
SEC. 3. SCHOOL REIMBURSEMENT.
Section 1321(e)(2) of the Panama Canal Act of 1979
(22 U.S.C. 3731(e)(2)) is amended by inserting after
‘‘schools in the Republic of Panama’’ the following: ‘‘or
in the United States’’.
‘‘(b) TOXICS USE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS.—(1)
For purposes of subsection (a)(2), an applicant for a per-
mit, and each generator of waste expected to be inciner-
ated at the facility, shall demonstrate that each such gen-
erator has completed and made available to the public, and
intends to complete and make available each subsequent
year, a report on the use of toxic or hazardous substances
at the generator’s facility and the reduction of the use of
such substances during the preceding year at the genera-
tor’s facility. The report shall include, at a minimum, the
following:
‘‘(A) A materials accounting for each toxic or
hazardous substance used in each production unit of
the generator’s facility and for the facility as a
whole.
‘‘(B) An evaluation of options for reducing the
use of toxic and hazardous substances in each pro-
duction unit of the generator’s facility.
‘‘(C) Two- and five-year goals, by toxic and
hazardous substance, for reducing the use of each
substance in each production unit of the generator’s
facility and in the facility as a whole.
‘‘(D) A schedule for implementing the goals re-
ferred to in subparagraph (C).
recommendations made by the Secretary if the Com-
mission determines that the Secretary deviated sub-
stantially from the final criteria referred to in sub-
section (a) in making recommendations. The Com-
mission shall explain and justify in the report any
recommendation made by the Commission that is
different from the recommendations made by the
Secretary.
(4) PROVISION
OF
CERTAIN
INFORMATION.—
After transmitting the report, the Commission shall
promptly provide, upon request, to any Member of
Congress information used by the Commission in
making its recommendations.
(f) ASSISTANCE FROM COMPTROLLER GENERAL.—
The Comptroller General of the United States shall—
(1) assist the Commission, to the extent re-
quested, in the Commission’s review and analysis of
the recommendations made by the Secretary pursu-
ant to subsection (b); and
(2) not later than 15 months after the date of
the enactment of this Act, transmit to the congres-
sional energy committees and to the Commission a
report containing a detailed analysis of the Sec-
retary’s recommendations and selection process.
(g) REVIEW BY THE PRESIDENT.—
HR 5 RHUC
substantive protections for health care providers and 
health care organizations from liability, loss, or damages 
than those provided by this title or create a cause of ac-
tion. 
(c) STATE FLEXIBILITY.—No provision of this title 
shall be construed to preempt— 
(1) any State law (whether effective before, on, 
or after the date of the enactment of this title) that 
specifies a particular monetary amount of compen-
satory or punitive damages (or the total amount of 
damages) that may be awarded in a health care law-
suit, regardless of whether such monetary amount is 
greater or lesser than is provided for under this title, 
notwithstanding section 4(a); or 
(2) any defense available to a party in a health 
care lawsuit under any other provision of State or 
Federal law. 
SEC. 111. APPLICABILITY; EFFECTIVE DATE. 
This title shall apply to any health care lawsuit 
brought in a Federal or State court, or subject to an alter-
native dispute resolution system, that is initiated on or 
after the date of the enactment of this title, except that 
any health care lawsuit arising from an injury occurring 
prior to the date of the enactment of this title shall be 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:31 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5.RHUC
H5
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 5 RHUC
If a separate proceeding is requested, evidence relevant 
only to the claim for punitive damages, as determined by 
applicable State law, shall be inadmissible in any pro-
ceeding to determine whether compensatory damages are 
to be awarded. 
(b) DETERMINING AMOUNT
OF PUNITIVE DAM-
AGES.— 
(1) FACTORS
CONSIDERED.—In determining 
the amount of punitive damages, if awarded, in a 
health care lawsuit, the trier of fact shall consider 
only the following— 
(A) the severity of the harm caused by the 
conduct of such party; 
(B) the duration of the conduct or any 
concealment of it by such party; 
(C) the profitability of the conduct to such 
party; 
(D) the number of products sold or med-
ical procedures rendered for compensation, as 
the case may be, by such party, of the kind 
causing the harm complained of by the claim-
ant; 
(E) any criminal penalties imposed on such 
party, as a result of the conduct complained of 
by the claimant; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:31 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5.RHUC
H5
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4249
To amend Public Law 89–732 to permit the adjustment to lawful permanent
residence of Haitians in the same manner as provided for Cubans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 19, 1994
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend Public Law 89–732 to permit the adjustment
to lawful permanent residence of Haitians in the same
manner as provided for Cubans.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Haitian Adjustment
Equity Act of 1994’’.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CUBAN ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS
TO HAITIANS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of Public Law
89–732 is amended by inserting ‘‘or Haiti’’ after ‘‘Cuba’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act and shall apply to aliens who have been
inspected and admitted, or paroled, into the United States
before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3. REPORT ON DISPARATE TREATMENT OF CUBANS
AND HAITIANS UNDER THE IMMIGRATION
LAWS.
The Attorney General shall submit to Congress annu-
ally a report describing any disparate treatment in the
processing of similarly situated Cubans and Haitians
under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6000 
To require verification of the immigration status of recipients of Federal 
benefit programs, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 21, 2012 
Mr. AKIN (for himself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. 
KINGSTON, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. FRANKS of Ari-
zona, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. JONES, Mr. BROOKS, Mr. HUELSKAMP, 
and Mr. HARPER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 
A BILL 
To require verification of the immigration status of recipients 
of Federal benefit programs, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Validating Entitlement 
Recipients through Indicated Federal Immigration Status 
Act of 2012’’ or as the ‘‘VERIFI Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 
No person may receive a Federal public benefit (as 
such term is defined in section 401(c) of the Personal Re-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
17:57 Jun 26, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6000.IH
H6000
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
sponsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 
1996 (8 U.S.C. 1611(c)) unless that person’s immigration 
status is in ‘‘satisfactory immigration status’’ as defined 
and in accordance with the Systematic Alien Verification 
for Entitlements (SAVE) program established by section 
1137 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–7). 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
17:57 Jun 26, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6000.IH
H6000
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6001 
To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work author-
ization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the United 
States. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 21, 2012 
Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from grant-
ing a work authorization to an alien found to have been 
unlawfully present in the United States. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection for 
American Workers Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN WORK AUTHORIZA-
TIONS. 
Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:08 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6001.IH
H6001
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
from granting a work authorization to an alien who has 
been finally determined, in a valid immigration proceeding 
during which due process was afforded, to have been at 
any time unlawfully present in the United States. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:08 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6001.IH
H6001
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6002 
To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 with respect 
to maintenance providers, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 21, 2012 
Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 
with respect to maintenance providers, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airline Maintenance 
Safety Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. MAINTENANCE PROVIDERS. 
Section 319 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 
Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95) is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:08 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6002.IH
H6002
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘by persons in 
accordance with subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘in 
accordance with this section’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (e); and 
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) FURTHER REQUIREMENTS.—An individual, if 
authorized to approve the return to service of an aircraft 
or component thereof (as determined by the Adminis-
trator), may perform covered work outside the United 
States on aircraft used to provide air transportation under 
part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, only 
if the individual— 
‘‘(1) is able to read, write, speak, and under-
stand the English language (as determined by the 
Administrator); and 
‘‘(2) holds a certificate under subpart D of part 
65 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:08 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6002.IH
H6002
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(XII) The provisions of section 
28 relating to contingent nonforfeiture 
benefits, if the policyholder declines 
the offer of a nonforfeiture provision 
described in paragraph (4). 
‘‘(ii) MODEL ACT.—The following re-
quirements of the model Act: 
‘‘(I) Section 6C (relating to pre-
existing conditions). 
‘‘(II) Section 6D (relating to 
prior hospitalization). 
‘‘(III) The provisions of section 8 
relating to contingent nonforfeiture 
benefits, if the policyholder declines 
the offer of a nonforfeiture provision 
described in paragraph (4). 
‘‘(B) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this 
paragraph— 
‘‘(i) MODEL PROVISIONS.—The terms 
‘model regulation’ and ‘model Act’ mean 
the long-term care insurance model regula-
tion, and the long-term care insurance 
model Act, respectively, promulgated by 
the National Association of Insurance 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
16:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6005.IH
H6005
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
248
(1) if the individual is recruited or referred for a fee but not hired,
3 years after the date of the recruiting or referral; or
(2) if the individual is hired, 3 years after the date of hire or one
year after the date the employment ends, whichever is later.
(d) COPYING DOCUMENTATION.—A person may copy a document pre-
sented by an individual under this section and retain the copy, but only (ex-
cept as otherwise permitted by law) to comply with this section.
(e) LIMITATION ON USE OF FORMS.—A form completed under this sec-
tion, and information contained in or appended to the form, may be used
only to enforce this title and sections 1001, 1028, 1546, and 1621 of title
18.
(f) NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION CARD NOT AUTHORIZED.—This chapter
does not authorize the establishment, issuance, or use of a national identi-
fication card.
§ 11104. Evaluating and changing employment verification
system
(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, ‘‘major change’’ means a change that
would—
(1) require an individual to present a new card or other document
(designed specifically to verify identity, employment eligibility, or both)
at the time of hiring, recruitment, or referral;
(2) provide for a telephone verification system under which—
(A) an employer, recruiter, or referrer must give an officer or
employee of the United States Government information about the
immigration status of a prospective employee; and
(B) the officer or employee of the Government gives the em-
ployer, recruiter, or referrer a verification code that the employer,
recruiter, or referrer must record; or
(3) require a change in a card used for accounting under the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C 301 et seq.), including a change requiring that
the only social security account number card that may be presented to
comply with section 11103(a)(4)(A) of this title is a card in a counter-
feit-resistant form consistent with section 205(c)(2)(F) (last sentence)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(F) (last sentence)).
(b) PRESIDENTIAL MONITORING AND IMPROVEMENTS.—(1) The Presi-
dent shall—
(A) provide for monitoring and evaluating the degree to which the
employment verification system under section 11103 of this title pro-
vides a secure system to verify employment eligibility in the United
States; and
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act, without 
regard to whether or not final regulations to carry out 
such amendments have been promulgated by such date. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
16:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6006.IH
H6006
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(7) Contracts awarded pursuant to section 
8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)) 
or section 31 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 657a) to a con-
tractor that is not covered by paragraph (5). 
‘‘(8) Contracts awarded pursuant to any other 
small business contracting preference to a contractor 
that is not covered by paragraph (6).’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
16:50 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6004.IH
H6004
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Zebra 
Mussel Barrier Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LACEY ACT. 
The Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3371 et seq.) and section 42 of title 18, United States 
Code, shall not apply with respect to any water transfer 
by the North Texas Municipal Water District and the 
Greater Texoma Utility Authority using only closed con-
veyance systems from the Lake Texoma raw water intake 
structure to treatment facilities at which all zebra mussels 
are extirpated and removed from the water transferred. 
Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 
2012. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6007 
AN ACT 
To exempt from the Lacey Act Amendments of 
1981 certain water transfers by the North Texas 
Municipal Water District and the Greater 
Texoma Utility Authority.
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6007 
To exempt from the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain water transfers 
by the North Texas Municipal Water District and the Greater Texoma 
Utility Authority. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 21, 2012 
Mr. HALL (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Nat-
ural Resources 
A BILL 
To exempt from the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain 
water transfers by the North Texas Municipal Water 
District and the Greater Texoma Utility Authority. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Zebra 
Mussel Barrier Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LACEY ACT. 
The Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3371 et seq.) shall not apply with respect to any water 
transfer by the North Texas Municipal Water District and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
16:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6007.IH
H6007
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
the Greater Texoma Utility Authority using only closed 
conveyance systems from the Lake Texoma raw water in-
take structure to treatment facilities at which all zebra 
mussels are extirpated and removed from the water trans-
ferred. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
16:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6007.IH
H6007
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6007 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works 
AN ACT 
To exempt from the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain 
water transfers by the North Texas Municipal Water 
District and the Greater Texoma Utility Authority. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:14 Sep 12, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6007.RFS
H6007
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 6007 RFS 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Zebra 
Mussel Barrier Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LACEY ACT. 
The Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3371 et seq.) and section 42 of title 18, United States 
Code, shall not apply with respect to any water transfer 
by the North Texas Municipal Water District and the 
Greater Texoma Utility Authority using only closed con-
veyance systems from the Lake Texoma raw water intake 
structure to treatment facilities at which all zebra mussels 
are extirpated and removed from the water transferred. 
Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 
2012. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:14 Sep 12, 2012
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6007.RFS
H6007
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4487 
AN ACT 
Making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Sauer 90 Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage 110G Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage 110CY Youth/Ladies Rifle
Savage 110WLE One of One Thousand Limited Edition Rifle
Savage 110GXP3 Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage 110F Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage 110FXP3 Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage 110GV Varmint Rifle
Savage 112FV Varmint Rifle
Savage Model 112FVS Varmint Rifle
Savage Model 112BV Heavy Barrel Varmint Rifle
Savage 116FSS Bolt-Action Rifle
Savage Model 116FSK Kodiak Rifle
Savage 110FP Police Rifle
Steyr-Mannlicher Sporter Models SL, L, M, S, S/T
Steyr-Mannlicher Luxus Model L, M, S
Steyr-Mannlicher Model M Professional Rifle
Tikka Bolt-Action Rifle
Tikka Premium Grade Rifles
Tikka Varmint/Continental Rifle
Tikka Whitetail/Battue Rifle
Ultra Light Arms Model 20 Rifle
Ultra Light Arms Model 28, Model 40 Rifles
Voere VEC 91 Lightning Bolt-Action Rifle
Voere Model 2165 Bolt-Action Rifle
Voere Model 2155, 2150 Bolt-Action Rifles
Weatherby Mark V Deluxe Bolt-Action Rifle
Weatherby Lasermark V Rifle
Weatherby Mark V Crown Custom Rifles
Weatherby Mark V Sporter Rifle
Weatherby Mark V Safari Grade Custom Rifles
Weatherby Weathermark Rifle
Weatherby Weathermark Alaskan Rifle
Weatherby Classicmark No. 1 Rifle
Weatherby Weatherguard Alaskan Rifle
Weatherby Vanguard VGX Deluxe Rifle
Weatherby Vanguard Classic Rifle
Weatherby Vanguard Classic No. 1 Rifle
Weatherby Vanguard Weatherguard Rifle
Wichita Classic Rifle
Wichita Varmint Rifle
Winchester Model 70 Sporter
Winchester Model 70 Sporter WinTuff
Winchester Model 70 SM Sporter
Winchester Model 70 Stainless Rifle
Winchester Model 70 Varmint
Winchester Model 70 Synthetic Heavy Varmint Rifle
Winchester Model 70 DBM Rifle
Winchester Model 70 DBM–S Rifle
Winchester Model 70 Featherweight
Winchester Model 70 Featherweight WinTuff
Winchester Model 70 Featherweight Classic
Winchester Model 70 Lightweight Rifle
Winchester Ranger Rifle
Winchester Model 70 Super Express Magnum