datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3893 
To provide for the suspension of Federal funding for the California High 
Speed Rail Project until sufficient non-Federal funds are available. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 16, 2014 
Mr. DENHAM (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. COOK, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. 
VALADAO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of 
California, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. NUNES, Mr. 
ISSA, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. ROYCE, and Mr. MCKEON) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To provide for the suspension of Federal funding for the 
California High Speed Rail Project until sufficient non- 
Federal funds are available. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Rail and 
Deterring Deficiency Act’’. 
SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF FEDERAL FUNDING. 
(a) CONGRESSIONAL DETERMINATION.—The Con-
gress determines that— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3893.IH
H3893
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(B) those State or other non-Federal funds 
are free and clear of any legal challenge or 
other hindrance to the expenditure of the funds 
by the Authority; and 
(C) the funds are or will be available at the 
time necessary to meet the Authority’s financial 
obligations as described in the grant agreement; 
or 
(2) September 30, 2017. 
(c) CHANGES TO AGREEMENT PROHIBITED.—Until 
the conditions described in subsection (b) have been met, 
the Federal Railroad Administration shall not amend, sup-
plement, or otherwise change the terms of the grant agree-
ment. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) AUTHORITY.—The term ‘‘Authority’’ means 
the California High Speed Rail Authority. 
(2) GRANT
AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘grant 
agreement’’ means the Federal Railroad Administra-
tion’s grant/cooperative agreement with the Author-
ity numbered FR–HSR–0009–10–01–05 made on 
December 5, 2012. 
(3) PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Project’’ has the 
meaning given that term in the grant agreement. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3893.IH
H3893
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2281
To provide that Members of Congress shall not be paid during Federal
Government shutdowns.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 7, 1995
Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on House Oversight
A BILL
To provide that Members of Congress shall not be paid
during Federal Government shutdowns.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DURING GOV-
ERNMENT SHUTDOWNS.
No Member of Congress may receive basic pay for
any period in which—
(1) there is a lapse in appropriations for any
Federal agency or department as a result of a fail-
ure to enact a regular appropriations bill or continu-
ing resolution; or
(2) the Federal Government is unable to make
payments or meet obligations because the public
debt limit under section 3101 of title 31, United
States Code, has been reached.
SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE PAY PROHIBITED.
No pay forfeited in accordance with section 1 may
be paid retroactively.
Æ
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3894 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
gross income of Social Security benefits. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 16, 2014 
Mr. MASSIE (for himself, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, and Mr. DESANTIS) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 
the inclusion in gross income of Social Security benefits. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Citizens Tax 
Elimination Act’’. 
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SO-
CIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 86 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 (relating to social security benefits) 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3894.IH
H3894
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(g) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 
any taxable year beginning after the date of the enactment 
of this subsection.’’. 
(b) SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS HELD HARM-
LESS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—There are hereby appro-
priated (out of any money in the Treasury not other-
wise appropriated) for each fiscal year to each fund 
under the Social Security Act or the Railroad Re-
tirement Act of 1974 an amount equal to the reduc-
tion in the transfers to such fund for such fiscal 
year by reason of section 86(g) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986. 
(2) NO TAX INCREASES.—It is the sense of the 
Congress that tax increases will not be used to pro-
vide the revenue necessary to carry out paragraph 
(1). 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3894.IH
H3894
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2282
To modify the navigation project for the Thames River, Connecticut to alter
the dimensions of a turning basin in Norwich, Connecticut.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 7, 1995
Mr. GEJDENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To modify the navigation project for the Thames River,
Connecticut to alter the dimensions of a turning basin
in Norwich, Connecticut.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RECONFIGURATION OF TURNING BASIN.
(a) PROJECT MODIFICATION.—The project for navi-
gation, Thames River, Connecticut, authorized by the first
section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing construc-
tion, repair, and preservation of certain public works on
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes’’, approved Au-
gust 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), is modified to reconfigure
the turning basin in accordance with the following align-
spect to tobacco or tobacco products under the Federal
Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or the Comprehen-
sive Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act of 1986
which was not authorized before the date of the enactment
of this Act.
(b) REGULATIONS.—Any regulation issued by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services relating the reg-
ulation of the sale or use of tobacco or tobacco products
which takes effect before the date of the enactment of this
Act shall on such date be considered as repealed.
(c) CONSTRUCTION.—This Act shall not be construed
as a statement that the Secretary of Health and Human
Services had the authority to regulate the sale or use of
tobacco or tobacco products before the date of the enact-
ment of this Act.
Æ
II
Calendar No. 200
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995
Reported by Mr. ROTH, without amendment
AN ACT
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act
to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are
required to have in effect an automated data processing
and information retrieval system for use in the adminis-
tration of State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD-
LINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se-
curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking
‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
retary of the Interior on all determinations and actions
that are necessary to carry out this section.
(g) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:
(1) LAND SUITABLE FOR CONSERVATION HABI-
TAT.—The term ‘‘land suitable for conservation
habitat’’ means qualified land—
(A) that is occupied by a protected species;
or
(B) that—
(i) provides habitat which is suitable
for a protected species; and
(ii) is likely to be occupied by a pro-
tected species for part of each year.
(2) PROTECTED
SPECIES.—The term ‘‘pro-
tected species’’ means any species that is—
(A) included in a list published pursuant to
section 4(c) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973; or
(B) proposed pursuant to such Act to be
included in such a list.
(3) QUALIFIED
LAND.—The term ‘‘qualified
land’’ means land that—
(A) as of January 1, 1995, was used for
any agricultural purpose;
(B) is covered by—
(i) a cooperative management agree-
ment provided for in section 6 of the En-
dangered Species Act of 1973; or
(ii) a conservation plan provided for in
section 10(a) of such Act;
(C) is not the subject of a contract in ef-
fect under this section; and
(D) is not the subject of a contract in ef-
fect under chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII
of the Food Security Act of 1985.
(4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means
the Secretary of Agriculture.
(h) AUTHORITY SUBJECT
TO APPROPRIATIONS.—
The authority provided by this section shall be exercised
only to the extent and in the amounts provided in advance
in appropriations Acts.
Æ
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
AN ACT
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act
to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are
required to have in effect an automated data processing
and information retrieval system for use in the adminis-
tration of State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
286
son. For each eligible person that has established
one or more litigation venues pursuant to subsection
(d), the applicable percentage shall be comprised of
one-half of the facility location percentage for that
person plus one-half of the venue percentage for that
person.
(2) FACILITY LOCATION PERCENTAGE.—
(A) ONE OR MORE ELIGIBLE NPL FACILI-
TIES.—For each eligible person, the Fund shall
establish a facility location percentage. The per-
centage shall be equal to the weighted average
of the State percentages for each eligible NPL
facility for which such person has been identi-
fied as a potentially responsible party. In deter-
mining such weighted average, each such eligi-
ble facility shall be accorded equal value, except
as provided in paragraph (4).
(B) NO ELIGIBLE NPL FACILITIES.—For
each person not identified as a potentially re-
sponsible party at one or more eligible NPL fa-
cilities but who is, or is alleged to be, liable at
any time for removal (as defined in section
101(23) of CERCLA) at one or more eligible
non-NPL facilities, the Fund shall establish a
facility location percentage equal to the weight-
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD-
LINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se-
curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking
‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE-
PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act
(42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections
(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking
‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 27,
1995.
Attest:
Clerk.
this paragraph, the value of any contribution of
a qualified endangered species easement shall
be an amount equal to the excess of—
‘‘(i) the value of the property bur-
dened by the easement, determined without
regard to—
‘‘(I) such easement, and
‘‘(II) any restrictions imposed by
the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
over
‘‘(ii) the value of such property, deter-
mined with regard to such easement and
restrictions.
‘‘(B) QUALIFIED
ENDANGERED
SPECIES
EASEMENT.—For purposes of this paragraph,
the term ‘qualified endangered species ease-
ment’ means any restriction referred to in para-
graph (1)(C) contributed to the Secretary of the
Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, or a State
agency implementing an endangered species
program for the purpose described in paragraph
(4)(A)(iii). For purposes of the preceding sen-
tence, a restriction which is granted for at least
20 years shall be treated as granted in perpetu-
ity.’’
(b) PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED SPECIES AS CON-
SERVATION PURPOSE.—
(1) Subparagraph (A) of section 170(h)(4) of
such Code is amended by redesignating clauses (iii)
and (iv) as clauses (iv) and (v), respectively, and by
inserting after clause (ii) the following new clause:
‘‘(iii) the protection of a species des-
ignated endangered by the Secretary of the
Interior, or the Secretary of Commerce,
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973,’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to contributions made after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 5. CREDIT FOR COSTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENDAN-
GERED 
SPECIES 
CONSERVATION 
AGREE-
MENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart B of part IV of sub-
chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:
‘‘SEC. 30A. COSTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENDANGERED
SPECIES CONSERVATION AGREEMENT.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be allowed as a cred-
it against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable
year an amount equal to the endangered species conserva-
tion agreement costs paid or incurred by the taxpayer dur-
ing the taxable year.
‘‘(b) ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION AGREE-
MENT COSTS.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term
‘endangered species conservation agreement costs’ means
expenses which would not have been incurred by the tax-
payer but for an endangered species conservation agree-
ment (as defined in section 2057(c) but without regard
to paragraph (3) thereof) entered into by the taxpayer.
‘‘(c) APPLICATION WITH OTHER CREDITS.—The
credit allowed by subsection (a) for any taxable year shall
not exceed the excess (if any) of—
‘‘(1) the regular tax for the taxable year re-
duced by the sum of the credits allowable under sub-
part A and sections 27, 28, 29, and 30, over
‘‘(2) the tentative minimum tax for the taxable
year.’’
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
for such subpart B is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
‘‘Sec. 30A. Costs of compliance with endangered species conserva-
tion agreement.’’
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2287
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make S corporations eligible
for the rules applicable to real property subdivided for sale by
noncorporate taxpayers.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 7, 1995
Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make
S corporations eligible for the rules applicable to real
property subdivided for sale by noncorporate taxpayers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. S CORPORATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR RULES APPLI-
CABLE TO REAL PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED FOR
SALE BY NONCORPORATE TAXPAYERS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1237 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to real prop-
erty subdivided for sale) is amended by striking ‘‘other
H. R. 2288
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE FIRST SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five
An Act
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for 2 years
the deadline by which States are required to have in effect an automated data
processing and information retrieval system for use in the administration of
State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEADLINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking ‘‘1995’’ and inserting
‘‘1997’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE REPEAL OF FED-
ERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 652) is amend-
ed in each of subsections (d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e),
by striking ‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for
2 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect
an automated data processing and information retrieval system for use
in the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1995
Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. FORD, Mr. CAMP, Mr. MCCRERY, Mrs. KEN-
NELLY, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.
LEVIN, Mr. NUSSLE, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. EN-
SIGN, and Mr. STARK) introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act
to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are
required to have in effect an automated data processing
and information retrieval system for use in the adminis-
tration of State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD-
LINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se-
curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking
‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE-
PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act
(42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections
(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking
‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Æ
II
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
AN ACT
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act
to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are
required to have in effect an automated data processing
and information retrieval system for use in the adminis-
tration of State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 2288 RFS
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD-
LINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se-
curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking
‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE-
PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act
(42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections
(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking
‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 27,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
IB
Union Calendar No. 135
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
[Report No. 104–250]
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend for
2 years the deadline by which States are required to have in effect
an automated data processing and information retrieval system for use
in the administration of State plans for child and spousal support.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1995
Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. FORD, Mr. CAMP, Mr. MCCRERY, Mrs. KEN-
NELLY, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.
LEVIN, Mr. NUSSLE, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. EN-
SIGN, and Mr. STARK) introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Ways and Means
SEPTEMBER 19, 1995
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union
and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act
to extend for 2 years the deadline by which States are
required to have in effect an automated data processing
and information retrieval system for use in the adminis-
tration of State plans for child and spousal support.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTOMATION DEAD-
LINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 454(24) of the Social Se-
curity Act (42 U.S.C. 654(24)) is amended by striking
‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE-
PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act
(42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections
(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking
‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Union Calendar No. 135
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
[Report No. 104–250]
A BILL
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security
Act to extend for 2 years the deadline by which
States are required to have in effect an auto-
mated data processing and information retrieval
system for use in the administration of State
plans for child and spousal support.
SEPTEMBER 19, 1995
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed
HR 2288 RS
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO THE RE-
PEAL OF FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 452 of such Act
(42 U.S.C. 652) is amended in each of subsections
(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), and (e), by striking
‘‘455(a)(1)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘454(16)’’.
Passed the House of Representatives September 27,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
158 
‘‘(i) notifying the Administrator that 
the State will adopt and implement such a 
permit program; 
‘‘(ii) not later than 6 months after the 
date of such notification, submitting to the 
Administrator a certification under sub-
section (b)(2); and 
‘‘(iii) receiving from the Adminis-
trator— 
‘‘(I) a determination that the 
State coal combustion residuals per-
mit program meets the specifications 
described in subsection (c)(1); and 
‘‘(II) a timeline for transition of 
control of the coal combustion residu-
als permit program. 
‘‘(2) REVIEW OF DETERMINATION.— 
‘‘(A) DETERMINATION
REQUIRED.—The 
Administrator shall make a determination 
under paragraph (1) not later than 90 days 
after the date on which the State submits a cer-
tification 
under 
paragraph 
(1)(A)(ii) 
or 
(1)(C)(ii), or notifies the Administrator that the 
deficiencies have been remedied pursuant to 
paragraph (1)(B)(i), as applicable. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:35 Jan 23, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3895.IH
H3895
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 200
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2288
AN ACT
To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security
Act to extend for 2 years the deadline by which
States are required to have in effect an auto-
mated data processing and information retrieval
system for use in the administration of State
plans for child and spousal support.
SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995
Reported without amendment