I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 899 
To provide for additional safeguards with respect to imposing Federal 
mandates, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 28, 2013 
Ms. FOXX (for herself, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, 
Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. MCINTYRE) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 
and in addition to the Committees on the Budget, Rules, and the Judici-
ary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 
case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To provide for additional safeguards with respect to imposing 
Federal mandates, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unfunded Mandates 
Information and Transparency Act of 2013’’. 
SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this Act is— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) to improve the quality of the deliberations 
of Congress with respect to proposed Federal man-
dates by— 
(A) providing Congress and the public with 
more complete information about the effects of 
such mandates; and 
(B) ensuring that Congress acts on such 
mandates only after focused deliberation on 
their effects; and 
(2) to enhance the ability of Congress and the 
public to identify Federal mandates that may impose 
undue harm on consumers, workers, employers, 
small businesses, and State, local, and tribal govern-
ments. 
SEC. 3. PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE 
STUDIES ON POLICIES INVOLVING CHANGES 
IN CONDITIONS OF GRANT AID. 
Section 202(g) of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 (2 U.S.C. 602(g)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) ADDITIONAL STUDIES.—At the request of 
any Chairman or ranking member of the minority of 
a Committee of the Senate or the House of Rep-
resentatives, the Director shall conduct an assess-
ment comparing the authorized level of funding in a 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
bill or resolution to the prospective costs of carrying 
out any changes to a condition of Federal assistance 
being imposed on State, local, or tribal governments 
participating in the Federal assistance program con-
cerned or, in the case of a bill or joint resolution 
that authorizes such sums as are necessary, an as-
sessment of an estimated level of funding compared 
to such costs.’’. 
SEC. 4. CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION OF DIRECT COSTS TO 
REFLECT CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE 
PRACTICE. 
Section 421(3) of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 (2 U.S.C. 658(3)(A)(i)) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A)(i), by inserting ‘‘incur 
or’’ before ‘‘be required’’; and 
(2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting after ‘‘to 
spend’’ the following: ‘‘or could forgo in profits, in-
cluding costs passed on to consumers or other enti-
ties taking into account, to the extent practicable, 
behavioral changes,’’. 
SEC. 5. EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF REPORTING REQUIRE-
MENTS TO INCLUDE REGULATIONS IMPOSED 
BY INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES. 
Paragraph (1) of section 421 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 658) is amended by striking 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(3) in section 206 (2 U.S.C. 1536), by striking 
‘‘Director of the Office of Management and Budget’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Administrator of the Office of Infor-
mation and Regulatory Affairs’’. 
SEC. 7. APPLYING SUBSTANTIVE POINT OF ORDER TO PRI-
VATE SECTOR MANDATES. 
Section 425(a)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act 
of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 658d(a)(2)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Federal intergovernmental 
mandates’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal mandates’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘or 424(b)(1)’’ after ‘‘section 
424(a)(1)’’. 
SEC. 8. REGULATORY PROCESS AND PRINCIPLES. 
Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 201. REGULATORY PROCESS AND PRINCIPLES. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each agency shall, unless other-
wise expressly prohibited by law, assess the effects of Fed-
eral regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal govern-
ments and the private sector (other than to the extent that 
such regulatory actions incorporate requirements specifi-
cally set forth in law) in accordance with the following 
principles: 
‘‘(1) Each agency shall identify the problem 
that it intends to address (including, if applicable, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
the failures of private markets or public institutions 
that warrant new agency action) as well as assess 
the significance of that problem. 
‘‘(2) Each agency shall examine whether exist-
ing regulations (or other law) have created, or con-
tributed to, the problem that a new regulation is in-
tended to correct and whether those regulations (or 
other law) should be modified to achieve the in-
tended goal of regulation more effectively. 
‘‘(3) Each agency shall identify and assess 
available alternatives to direct regulation, including 
providing economic incentives to encourage the de-
sired behavior, such as user fees or marketable per-
mits, or providing information upon which choices 
can be made by the public. 
‘‘(4) If an agency determines that a regulation 
is the best available method of achieving the regu-
latory objective, it shall design its regulations in the 
most cost-effective manner to achieve the regulatory 
objective. In doing so, each agency shall consider in-
centives for innovation, consistency, predictability, 
the costs of enforcement and compliance (to the gov-
ernment, regulated entities, and the public), flexi-
bility, distributive impacts, and equity. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(5) Each agency shall assess both the costs 
and the benefits of the intended regulation and, rec-
ognizing that some costs and benefits are difficult to 
quantify, propose or adopt a regulation, unless ex-
pressly prohibited by law, only upon a reasoned de-
termination that the benefits of the intended regula-
tion justify its costs. 
‘‘(6) Each agency shall base its decisions on the 
best reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, eco-
nomic, and other information concerning the need 
for, and consequences of, the intended regulation. 
‘‘(7) Each agency shall identify and assess al-
ternative forms of regulation and shall, to the extent 
feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than 
specifying the behavior or manner of compliance 
that regulated entities must adopt. 
‘‘(8) Each agency shall avoid regulations that 
are inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative with its 
other regulations or those of other Federal agencies. 
‘‘(9) Each agency shall tailor its regulations to 
minimize the costs of the cumulative impact of regu-
lations. 
‘‘(10) Each agency shall draft its regulations to 
be simple and easy to understand, with the goal of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
minimizing the potential for uncertainty and litiga-
tion arising from such uncertainty. 
‘‘(b) REGULATORY ACTION DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘regulatory action’ means any substantive 
action by an agency (normally published in the Federal 
Register) that promulgates or is expected to lead to the 
promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including ad-
vance notices of proposed rulemaking and notices of pro-
posed rulemaking.’’. 
SEC. 9. EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF STATEMENTS TO AC-
COMPANY SIGNIFICANT REGULATORY AC-
TIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 202 of 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 
1532) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Unless otherwise expressly pro-
hibited by law, before promulgating any general notice of 
proposed rulemaking or any final rule, or within six 
months after promulgating any final rule that was not pre-
ceded by a general notice of proposed rulemaking, if the 
proposed rulemaking or final rule includes a Federal man-
date that may result in an annual effect on State, local, 
or tribal governments, or to the private sector, in the ag-
gregate of $100,000,000 or more in any 1 year, the agency 
shall prepare a written statement containing the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(1) The text of the draft proposed rulemaking 
or final rule, together with a reasonably detailed de-
scription of the need for the proposed rulemaking or 
final rule and an explanation of how the proposed 
rulemaking or final rule will meet that need. 
‘‘(2) An assessment of the potential costs and 
benefits of the proposed rulemaking or final rule, in-
cluding an explanation of the manner in which the 
proposed rulemaking or final rule is consistent with 
a statutory requirement and avoids undue inter-
ference with State, local, and tribal governments in 
the exercise of their governmental functions. 
‘‘(3) A qualitative and quantitative assessment, 
including the underlying analysis, of benefits antici-
pated from the proposed rulemaking or final rule 
(such as the promotion of the efficient functioning of 
the economy and private markets, the enhancement 
of health and safety, the protection of the natural 
environment, and the elimination or reduction of dis-
crimination or bias). 
‘‘(4) A qualitative and quantitative assessment, 
including the underlying analysis, of costs antici-
pated from the proposed rulemaking or final rule 
(such as the direct costs both to the Government in 
administering the final rule and to businesses and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
others in complying with the final rule, and any ad-
verse effects on the efficient functioning of the econ-
omy, private markets (including productivity, em-
ployment, and international competitiveness), health, 
safety, and the natural environment); 
‘‘(5) Estimates by the agency, if and to the ex-
tent that the agency determines that accurate esti-
mates are reasonably feasible, of— 
‘‘(A) the future compliance costs of the 
Federal mandate; and 
‘‘(B) any disproportionate budgetary ef-
fects of the Federal mandate upon any par-
ticular regions of the Nation or particular 
State, local, or tribal governments, urban or 
rural or other types of communities, or par-
ticular segments of the private sector. 
‘‘(6)(A) A detailed description of the extent of 
the agency’s prior consultation with the private sec-
tor and elected representatives (under section 204) 
of the affected State, local, and tribal governments. 
‘‘(B) A detailed summary of the comments and 
concerns that were presented by the private sector 
and State, local, or tribal governments either orally 
or in writing to the agency. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(C) A detailed summary of the agency’s eval-
uation of those comments and concerns. 
‘‘(7) A detailed summary of how the agency 
complied with each of the regulatory principles de-
scribed in section 201.’’. 
(b) REQUIREMENT FOR DETAILED SUMMARY.—Sub-
section (b) of section 202 of such Act is amended by in-
serting ‘‘detailed’’ before ‘‘summary’’. 
SEC. 10. ENHANCED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION. 
Section 204 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1534) is amended— 
(1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘AND 
PRIVATE SECTOR’’ before ‘‘INPUT’’; 
(2) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘, and impacted parties 
within the private sector (including small busi-
ness),’’ after ‘‘on their behalf)’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘Federal intergovernmental 
mandates’’ and inserting ‘‘Federal mandates’’; 
and 
(3) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(c) GUIDELINES.—For appropriate implementation 
of subsections (a) and (b) consistent with applicable laws 
and regulations, the following guidelines shall be followed: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(1) Consultations shall take place as early as 
possible, before issuance of a notice of proposed rule-
making, continue through the final rule stage, and 
be integrated explicitly into the rulemaking process. 
‘‘(2) Agencies shall consult with a wide variety 
of State, local, and tribal officials and impacted par-
ties within the private sector (including small busi-
nesses). Geographic, political, and other factors that 
may differentiate varying points of view should be 
considered. 
‘‘(3) Agencies should estimate benefits and 
costs to assist with these consultations. The scope of 
the consultation should reflect the cost and signifi-
cance of the Federal mandate being considered. 
‘‘(4) Agencies shall, to the extent practicable— 
‘‘(A) seek out the views of State, local, and 
tribal governments, and impacted parties within 
the private sector (including small business), on 
costs, benefits, and risks; and 
‘‘(B) solicit ideas about alternative meth-
ods of compliance and potential flexibilities, and 
input on whether the Federal regulation will 
harmonize with and not duplicate similar laws 
in other levels of government. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(5) Consultations shall address the cumulative 
impact of regulations on the affected entities. 
‘‘(6) Agencies may accept electronic submis-
sions of comments by relevant parties but may not 
use those comments as the sole method of satisfying 
the guidelines in this subsection.’’. 
SEC. 11. NEW AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 
OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORY 
AFFAIRS. 
Section 208 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1538) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 208. OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORY AF-
FAIRS RESPONSIBILITIES. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs shall provide mean-
ingful guidance and oversight so that each agency’s regu-
lations for which a written statement is required under 
section 202 are consistent with the principles and require-
ments of this title, as well as other applicable laws, and 
do not conflict with the policies or actions of another agen-
cy. If the Administrator determines that an agency’s regu-
lations for which a written statement is required under 
section 202 do not comply with such principles and re-
quirements, are not consistent with other applicable laws, 
or conflict with the policies or actions of another agency, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
the Administrator shall identify areas of non-compliance, 
notify the agency, and request that the agency comply be-
fore the agency finalizes the regulation concerned. 
‘‘(b) ANNUAL STATEMENTS TO CONGRESS ON AGEN-
CY COMPLIANCE.—The Director of the Office of Informa-
tion and Regulatory Affairs annually shall submit to Con-
gress, including the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee 
on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of 
Representatives, a written report detailing compliance by 
each agency with the requirements of this title that relate 
to regulations for which a written statement is required 
by section 202, including activities undertaken at the re-
quest of the Director to improve compliance, during the 
preceding reporting period. The report shall also contain 
an appendix detailing compliance by each agency with sec-
tion 204.’’. 
SEC. 12. RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FEDERAL 
REGULATIONS. 
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104–4; 2 U.S.C. 1511 et seq.) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating section 209 as section 210; 
and 
(2) by inserting after section 208 the following 
new section 209: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘SEC. 209. RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FED-
ERAL REGULATIONS. 
‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—At the request of the chairman 
or ranking minority member of a standing or select com-
mittee of the House of Representatives or the Senate, an 
agency shall conduct a retrospective analysis of an existing 
Federal regulation promulgated by an agency. 
‘‘(b) REPORT.—Each agency conducting a retrospec-
tive analysis of existing Federal regulations pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall submit to the chairman of the relevant 
committee, Congress, and the Comptroller General a re-
port containing, with respect to each Federal regulation 
covered by the analysis— 
‘‘(1) a copy of the Federal regulation; 
‘‘(2) the continued need for the Federal regula-
tion; 
‘‘(3) the nature of comments or complaints re-
ceived concerning the Federal regulation from the 
public since the Federal regulation was promulgated; 
‘‘(4) the extent to which the Federal regulation 
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal 
regulations, and, to the extent feasible, with State 
and local governmental rules; 
‘‘(5) the degree to which technology, economic 
conditions, or other factors have changed in the area 
affected by the Federal regulation; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(6) a complete analysis of the retrospective di-
rect costs and benefits of the Federal regulation that 
considers studies done outside the Federal Govern-
ment (if any) estimating such costs or benefits; and 
‘‘(7) any litigation history challenging the Fed-
eral regulation.’’. 
SEC. 13. EXPANSION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. 
Section 401(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1571(a)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A)— 
(A) 
by 
striking 
‘‘sections 
202 
and 
203(a)(1) and (2)’’ each place it appears and 
inserting ‘‘sections 201, 202, 203(a)(1) and (2), 
and 205(a) and (b)’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘only’’ each place it ap-
pears; 
(2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘section 
202’’ and all that follows through the period at the 
end and inserting the following: ‘‘section 202, pre-
pare the written plan under section 203(a)(1) and 
(2), or comply with section 205(a) and (b), a court 
may compel the agency to prepare such written 
statement, prepare such written plan, or comply with 
such section.’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘written state-
ment or plan is required’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘shall not’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘written statement under section 202, a written plan 
under section 203(a)(1) and (2), or compliance with 
sections 201 and 205(a) and (b) is required, the in-
adequacy or failure to prepare such statement (in-
cluding the inadequacy or failure to prepare any es-
timate, analysis, statement, or description), to pre-
pare such written plan, or to comply with such sec-
tion may’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:06 Mar 02, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H899.IH
H899
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS