372 
HR 2864 PCS 
‘‘(124) NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.—$6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, 
including ocean outfalls, North Myrtle Beach, South 
Carolina. 
‘‘(125) 
SURFSIDE, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.— 
$6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, includ-
ing stormwater system improvements and ocean out-
falls, Surfside, South Carolina. 
‘‘(126) ATHENS, TENNESSEE.—$16,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee. 
‘‘(127) DUCHESNE, IRON, AND UINTAH COUN-
TIES, UTAH.—$10,800,000 for water related infra-
structure, Duchesne, Iron, and Uintah Counties, 
Utah. 
‘‘(128) 
MONROE, 
NORTH
CAROLINA.— 
$11,500,000 for water related infrastructure, includ-
ing water supply reservoir dredging, Monroe, North 
Carolina. 
‘‘(129) 
CHARLOTTE, 
NORTH
CAROLINA.— 
$5,000,000 for phase II of the Briar Creek waste-
water project, Charlotte, North Carolina. 
‘‘(130) LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.— 
$3,000,000 for wastewater and water related infra-
structure, Diamond Bar, La Habra Heights, and 
Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, California.
373 
HR 2864 PCS 
‘‘(131) 
ORANGE
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$15,000,000 for wastewater and water related infra-
structure, Anaheim, Brea, La Habra, Mission Viejo, 
Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, Orange 
County, California. 
‘‘(132) 
SAN
BERNADINO
COUNTY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—$9,000,000 for wastewater and water re-
lated infrastructure, Chino and Chino Hills, San 
Bernadino County, California. 
‘‘(133) 
FAYETTEVILLE, 
GRANTVILLE, 
LA-
GRANGE, 
PINE
MOUNTAIN
(HARRIS
COUNTY), 
DOUGLASVILLE, 
AND
CARROLLTON, 
GEORGIA.— 
$24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture, Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Moun-
tain (Harris County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, 
Georgia. 
‘‘(134) MERIWETHER
AND
SPALDING
COUN-
TIES, GEORGIA.—$7,000,000 for water and waste-
water infrastructure, Meriwether and Spalding 
Counties, Georgia. 
‘‘(135) ARCADIA, SIERRA MADRE, AND UPLAND, 
CALIFORNIA.—$33,000,000 for water and waste-
water infrastructure, Arcadia, Sierra Madre, and 
Upland, 
California, 
including 
$13,000,000 
for 
stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
374 
HR 2864 PCS 
‘‘(136) 
FT. 
BEND
COUNTY, 
TEXAS.— 
$20,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend 
County, Texas. 
‘‘(137) NEW RIVER, CALIFORNIA.—$10,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure to improve water qual-
ity in the New River, California. 
‘‘(138) BIG
BEAR
AREA
REGIONAL
WASTE-
WATER
AGENCY, 
CALIFORNIA.—$15,000,000 for 
water reclamation and distribution, Big Bear Area 
Regional Wastewater Agency, California. 
‘‘(139) 
LAKE
NACIMIENTO, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$25,000,000 for water supply infrastructure for the 
communities of Atascadero, Paso Robles, Templeton, 
and San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, 
California. 
‘‘(140) OTERO, BENT, CROWLEY, KIOWA, AND 
PROWERS COUNTIES, COLORADO.—$35,000,000 for 
water transmission infrastructure, Otero, Bent, 
Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado. 
‘‘(141) 
SAIPAN, 
NORTHERN
MARIANA
IS-
LANDS.—$20,000,000 for water related infrastruc-
ture, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands. 
‘‘(142) STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.—$33,000,000 
for water treatment and distribution infrastructure, 
Stockton, California.
375 
HR 2864 PCS 
‘‘(143) JACKSON, 
MISSISSIPPI.—$25,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, 
Mississippi. 
‘‘(144) CROOKED CREEK, MARLBORO COUNTY, 
SOUTH CAROLINA.—$25,000,000 for a project for 
water storage and water supply infrastructure on 
Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South Carolina. 
‘‘(145) CENTRAL
TEXAS.—$20,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, 
Brazos, Burleson, Grimes, Hill, Hood, Johnson, 
Madison, McLennan, Limestone, Robertson, and 
Somervell Counties, Texas. 
‘‘(146) 
EL
PASO
COUNTY, 
TEXAS.— 
$25,000,000 for water related infrastructure and re-
source protection and development, El Paso County, 
Texas. 
‘‘(147) 
NORTHERN
WEST
VIRGINIA.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, 
Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, 
Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Min-
eral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, Ritchie Counties, West 
Virginia.’’.
376 
HR 2864 PCS 
TITLE VI—FLORIDA 
EVERGLADES 
SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLOR-
IDA. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The project for Hillsboro and 
Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 
101(a)(16) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to authorize the Sec-
retary to carry out the project at a total cost of 
$39,200,000. 
(b) TREATMENT.—Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is 
amended— 
(1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The project for aquifer storage and recov-
ery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, au-
thorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), 
shall be treated for purposes of this section as being 
in the Plan, except that operation and maintenance 
costs of the project shall remain a non-Federal re-
sponsibility.’’; and 
(2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ‘‘subpara-
graph (B)’’ the following: ‘‘and the project for aqui-