156 
(1) The extent to which the property aligns 
with the current missions of the Corps of Engineers. 
(2) The economic impact of the property on ex-
isting communities in the vicinity of the property. 
(3) The extent to which the utilization rate for 
the property is being maximized and is consistent 
with nongovernmental industry standards for the 
given function or operation. 
(4) The extent to which the reduction or elimi-
nation of the property could reduce operation and 
maintenance costs of the Corps of Engineers. 
(5) The extent to which the reduction or elimi-
nation of the property could reduce energy consump-
tion by the Corps of Engineers. 
(c) NOTIFICATION.—As soon as practicable following 
completion of the inventory of properties under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall provide the inventory to the Ad-
ministrator of General Services. 
(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 
after the date of the notification under subsection (c), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a report containing the findings of the Sec-
157 
retary with respect to the assessment and inventory re-
quired under subsection (a). 
SEC. 303. BACKLOG PREVENTION. 
(a) PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—A water resources develop-
ment project, or separable element of such a project, 
authorized for construction by this Act shall not be 
authorized after the last day of the 7-year period be-
ginning on the date of enactment of this Act unless 
during that period funds have been obligated for 
construction of such project. 
(2) IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECTS.—Not later 
than 60 days after the expiration of the 7-year pe-
riod referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and In-
frastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate a report that identifies the projects deauthor-
ized under paragraph (1). 
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 60 days 
after the expiration of the 12-year period beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
158 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
that contains— 
(1) a list of any water resources development 
projects authorized by this Act for which construc-
tion has not been completed during that period; 
(2) a description of the reasons the projects 
were not completed; 
(3) a schedule for the completion of the projects 
based on expected levels of appropriations; and 
(4) a 5-year and 10-year projection of construc-
tion backlog and any recommendations to Congress 
regarding how to mitigate current problems and the 
backlog. 
SEC. 304. DEAUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The following projects are not au-
thorized after the date of enactment of this Act: 
(1) WALNUT CREEK (PACHECO CREEK), CALI-
FORNIA.—The portions of the project for flood pro-
tection on Walnut Creek, California, constructed 
under section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 
(Public Law 86–645; 74 Stat. 488), consisting of 
the Walnut Creek project from Sta 0+00 to Sta 
142+00 and the upstream extent of the Walnut 
Creek project along Pacheco Creek from Sta 0+00 
to Sta 73+50.
159 
(2) WALNUT CREEK (SAN RAMON CREEK), CALI-
FORNIA.—The portion of the project for flood pro-
tection on Walnut Creek, California, constructed 
under section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 
(Public Law 86–645; 74 Stat. 488), consisting of 
the culvert constructed by the Department of the 
Army on San Ramon Creek from Sta 4+27 to Sta 
14+27. 
(3) HILLSBOROUGH
(HILLSBORO)
BAY
AND 
RIVER, FLORIDA.—Those portions of the project for 
navigation, Hillsborough (Hillsboro) Bay and River, 
Florida, authorized by the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 
Stat. 1126; chapter 425), that extend on either side 
of the Hillsborough River from the Kennedy Boule-
vard bridge to the mouth of the river that cause the 
existing channel to exceed 100 feet in width. 
(4) KAHULUI WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FA-
CILITY, MAUI, HAWAII.—The project carried out pur-
suant to the authority provided by section 14 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) to pro-
vide shoreline protection for the Kahului Wastewater 
Reclamation Facility, located on the Island of Maui 
in the State of Hawaii. 
(5) CHICAGO HARBOR, ILLINOIS.—The portion 
of the project for navigation, Chicago Harbor, Illi-
160 
nois, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1129; chapter 425), and 
the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 
Stat. 1283; chapter 95), and described as follows: 
(A) Beginning at the southwest corner of 
Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chi-
cago sluice gate that abuts the north wall of the 
Chicago River Lock. 
(B) Thence running north for approxi-
mately 290 feet. 
(C) Thence running east approximately 
1,000 feet. 
(D) Thence running south approximately 
290 feet. 
(E) Thence running west approximately 
1,000 feet to the point of origin. 
(6) LUCAS-BERG PIT, ILLINOIS WATERWAY AND 
GRANT CALUMET RIVER, ILLINOIS.—The portion of 
the project for navigation, Illinois Waterway and 
Grand Calumet River, Illinois, authorized by the 
first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing 
the construction of certain public works on rivers 
and harbors for flood control, and for other pur-
poses’’, approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 636; chap-
161 
ter 596), that consists of the Lucas-Berg Pit con-
fined disposal facility, Illinois. 
(7) ROCKLAND HARBOR, MAINE.—The portion 
of the project for navigation, Rockland Harbor, 
Maine, authorized by the Act entitled ‘‘An Act mak-
ing appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors, and for other purposes’’, approved June 3, 
1896 (29 Stat. 202), and described as follows: 
(A) Beginning at the point in the 14-foot 
turning 
basin 
limit 
with 
coordinates 
N162,927.61, E826,210.16. 
(B) Thence running north 45 degrees 45 
minutes 15.6 seconds east 287.45 feet to a 
point N163,128.18, E826,416.08. 
(C) Thence running south 13 degrees 17 
minutes 53.3 seconds east 129.11 feet to a 
point N163,002.53, E826,445.77. 
(D) Thence running south 45 degrees 45 
minutes 18.4 seconds west 221.05 feet to a 
point N162,848.30, E826,287.42. 
(E) Thence running north 44 degrees 14 
minutes 59.5 seconds west 110.73 feet to the 
point of origin.
162 
(8) CORSICA RIVER, QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY, 
MARYLAND.—The portion of the project for improv-
ing the Corsica River, Maryland, authorized by the 
first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act making ap-
propriations for the construction, repair, and preser-
vation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes’’, approved July 25, 1912 
(37 Stat. 205), and described as follows: Approxi-
mately 2,000 feet of the eastern section of the 
project channel extending from— 
(A) centerline station 0+000 (coordinates 
N506350.60, E1575013.60); to 
(B) 
station 
2+000 
(coordinates 
N508012.39, E1574720.18). 
(9) GLOUCESTER
HARBOR
AND
ANNISQUAM 
RIVER, 
MASSACHUSETTS.—The portions of the 
project for navigation, Gloucester Harbor and 
Annisquam River, Massachusetts, authorized by sec-
tion 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing the 
construction, repair, and preservation of certain pub-
lic works on rivers and harbors, and for other pur-
poses’’, approved of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 12; 
chapter 19), consisting of an 8-foot anchorage area 
in Lobster Cove, and described as follows:
163 
(A) Beginning at a bend along the easterly 
limit of the existing project, N3063230.31, 
E878283.77, 
thence 
running 
northwesterly 
about 339 feet to a point, N3063478.86, 
E878053.83, 
thence 
running 
northwesterly 
about 281 feet to a bend on the easterly limit 
of 
the 
existing 
project, 
N3063731.88, 
E877932.54, 
thence 
running 
southeasterly 
about 612 feet along the easterly limit of the 
existing project to the point of origin. 
(B) Beginning at a bend along the easterly 
limit of the existing project, N3064065.80, 
E878031.45, 
thence 
running 
northwesterly 
about 621 feet to a point, N3064687.05, 
E878031.13, 
thence 
running 
southwesterly 
about 122 feet to a point, N3064686.98, 
E877908.85, 
thence 
running 
southeasterly 
about 624 feet to a point, N3064063.31, 
E877909.17, 
thence 
running 
southwesterly 
about 512 feet to a point, N3063684.73, 
E877564.56, thence running about 741 feet to 
a point along the westerly limit of the existing 
project, N3063273.98, E876947.77, thence 
running northeasterly about 533 feet to a bend 
along the westerly limit of the existing project,
164 
N3063585.62, E877380.63, thence running 
about 147 feet northeasterly to a bend along 
the westerly limit of the project, N3063671.29, 
E877499.63, 
thence 
running 
northeasterly 
about 233 feet to a bend along the westerly 
limit of the existing project, N3063840.60, 
E877660.29, thence running about 339 feet 
northeasterly to a bend along the westerly limit 
of 
the 
existing 
project, 
N3064120.34, 
E877852.55, thence running about 573 feet to 
a bend along the westerly limit of the existing 
project, N3064692.98, E877865.04, thence 
running about 113 feet to a bend along the 
northerly 
limit 
of 
the 
existing 
project, 
N3064739.51, E877968.31, thence running 
145 feet southeasterly to a bend along the 
northerly 
limit 
of 
the 
existing 
project, 
N3064711.19, E878110.69, thence running 
about 650 feet along the easterly limit of the 
existing project to the point of origin. 
(10) IPSWICH
RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—The 
portion of the project for navigation, Ipswich River, 
Massachusetts, authorized by the first section of the 
Act of August 5, 1886 (24 Stat. 317, chapter 929) 
consisting of a 4-foot channel located at the entrance
165 
to the inner harbor at Ipswich Harbor, and de-
scribed as follows: 
(A) Lying northwesterly of a line com-
mencing at N3,074,938.09, E837,154.87. 
(B) Thence running easterly approximately 
feet 
to 
a 
point 
with 
coordinates 
N3,074,972.62, E837,203.93. 
(11) EAST FORK OF TRINITY RIVER, TEXAS.— 
The portion of the project for flood protection on the 
East Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, authorized by 
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 1185), that consists of the 2 levees identified 
as Kaufman County Levees K5E and K5W. 
(12) BURNHAM CANAL, WISCONSIN.—The por-
tion of the project for navigation, Milwaukee Harbor 
Project, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, known as the 
Burnham Canal, authorized by the first section of 
the Act entitled ‘‘An Act for the protection of com-
merce on Lake Michigan’’, approved March 3, 1843 
(5 Stat. 619; chapter 85), and described as follows: 
(A) Beginning at channel point #415a 
N381768.648, E2524554.836, a distance of 
about 170.58 feet. 
(B) Thence running south 53 degrees 43 
minutes 41 seconds west to channel point #417
166 
N381667.728, E2524417.311, a distance of 
about 35.01 feet. 
(C) Thence running south 34 degrees 10 
minutes 40 seconds west to channel point #501 
N381638.761, E2524397.639, a distance of 
about 139.25 feet. 
(D) Thence running south 34 degrees 10 
minutes 48 seconds west to channel point #503 
N381523.557, E2524319.406, a distance of 
about 235.98 feet. 
(E) Thence running south 32 degrees 59 
minutes 13 seconds west to channel point #505 
N381325.615, E2524190.925, a distance of 
about 431.29 feet. 
(F) Thence running south 32 degrees 36 
minutes 05 seconds west to channel point #509 
N380962.276, E2523958.547, a distance of 
about 614.52 feet. 
(G) Thence running south 89 degrees 05 
minutes 00 seconds west to channel point #511 
N380952.445, E2523344.107, a distance of 
about 74.68 feet. 
(H) Thence running north 89 degrees 04 
minutes 59 seconds west to channel point #512
167 
N381027.13, E2523342.91, a distance of about 
533.84 feet. 
(I) Thence running north 89 degrees 05 
minutes 00 seconds east to channel point #510 
N381035.67, E2523876.69, a distance of about 
47.86 feet. 
(J) Thence running north 61 degrees 02 
minutes 07 seconds east to channel point #508 
N381058.84, E2523918.56, a distance of about 
308.55 feet. 
(K) Thence running north 36 degrees 15 
minutes 29 seconds east to channel point #506 
N381307.65, E2524101.05, a distance of about 
199.98 feet. 
(L) Thence running north 32 degrees 59 
minutes 12 seconds east to channel point #504 
N381475.40, E2524209.93, a distance of about 
195.14 feet. 
(M) Thence running north 26 degrees 17 
minutes 22 seconds east to channel point #502 
N381650.36, E2524296.36, a distance of about 
81.82 feet. 
(N) Thence running north 88 degrees 51 
minutes 05 seconds west to channel point #419
168 
N381732.17, E2524294.72, a distance of about 
262.65 feet. 
(O) Thence running north 82 degrees 01 
minutes 02 seconds east to channel point 
#415a, the point of origin. 
(13) MANITOWOC
HARBOR, WISCONSIN.—The 
portion of the project for navigation, Manitowoc 
River, Manitowoc, Wisconsin, authorized by the Act 
of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58; chapter 104), and 
described as follows: The triangular area bound by— 
(A) 44.09893383N and 087.66854912W; 
(B) 44.09900535N and 087.66864372W; 
and 
(C) 44.09857884N and 087.66913123W. 
(b) SEWARD WATERFRONT, SEWARD, ALASKA.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 
the portion of the project for navigation, Seward 
Harbor, Alaska, identified as Tract H, Seward 
Original Townsite, Waterfront Park Replat, Plat No 
2012–4, Seward Recording District, shall not be 
subject to navigation servitude beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
(2) ENTRY BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—The 
Federal Government may enter upon the property 
referred to in paragraph (1) to carry out any re-
169 
quired operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation features of the project referred to in 
paragraph (1). 
(c) PORT OF HOOD RIVER, OREGON.— 
(1) EXTINGUISHMENT OF PORTIONS OF EXIST-
ING
FLOWAGE
EASEMENT.—With respect to the 
properties described in paragraph (2), beginning on 
the date of enactment of this Act, the flowage ease-
ment identified as Tract 1200E–6 on the Easement 
Deed recorded as Instrument No. 740320 is extin-
guished above elevation 79.39 feet (NGVD 29), the 
ordinary high water line. 
(2) AFFECTED
PROPERTIES.—The properties 
described in this paragraph, as recorded in Hood 
River County, Oregon, are as follows: 
(A) Instrument Number 2010–1235. 
(B) Instrument Number 2010–02366. 
(C) Instrument Number 2010–02367. 
(D) Parcel 2 of Partition Plat 2011–12P. 
(E) Parcel 1 of Partition Plat 2005–26P. 
(3) EXTINGUISHMENT
OF
FLOWAGE
EASE-
MENT.—With respect to the properties described in 
paragraph (2), the flowage easement is extinguished 
if the elevation of the property is above the standard 
project flood elevation.
170 
(4) FEDERAL LIABILITIES.—The United States 
shall not be liable for any injury caused by the extin-
guishment of the easement under this subsection. 
(5) NO EFFECT ON OTHER RIGHTS.—Nothing 
in this subsection affects the remaining rights and 
interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes. 
SEC. 305. LAND CONVEYANCES. 
(a) TULSA PORT OF CATOOSA, ROGERS COUNTY, 
OKLAHOMA LAND EXCHANGE.— 
(1) LAND EXCHANGE.—On conveyance by the 
Tulsa Port of Catoosa to the United States of all 
right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal 
land, the Secretary shall convey to the Tulsa Port of 
Catoosa all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the Federal land. 
(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the fol-
lowing definitions apply: 
(A) FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘Federal 
land’’ means the approximately 87 acres of land 
situated in Rogers County, Oklahoma, con-
tained within United States Tracts 413 and 
427 and acquired for the McClellan-Kerr Ar-
kansas Navigation System.
171 
(B) 
NON-FEDERAL
LAND.—The 
term 
‘‘non-Federal land’’ means the approximately 
34 acres of land situated in Rogers County, 
Oklahoma, and owned by the Tulsa Port of 
Catoosa that lie immediately south and east of 
the Federal land. 
(3) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS.— 
(A) DEEDS.— 
(i) DEED TO NON-FEDERAL LAND.— 
The Secretary may only accept conveyance 
of the non-Federal land by warranty deed, 
as determined acceptable by the Secretary. 
(ii) DEED TO FEDERAL LAND.—The 
Secretary shall convey the Federal land to 
the Tulsa Port of Catoosa by quitclaim 
deed and subject to any reservations, 
terms, and conditions the Secretary deter-
mines necessary to— 
(I) allow the United States to op-
erate and maintain the McClellan- 
Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Sys-
tem; and 
(II) protect the interests of the 
United States.
172 
(iii) CASH
PAYMENT.—If the ap-
praised fair market value of the Federal 
land, as determined by the Secretary, ex-
ceeds the appraised fair market value of 
the non-Federal land, as determined by the 
Secretary, the Tulsa Port of Catoosa shall 
make a cash payment to the United States 
reflecting the difference in the appraised 
fair market values. 
(b) CITY OF ASOTIN, WASHINGTON.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey 
to the city of Asotin, Asotin County, Washington, 
without monetary consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the land de-
scribed in paragraph (3). 
(2) REVERSION.—If the land transferred under 
this subsection ceases at any time to be used for a 
public purpose, the land shall revert to the United 
States. 
(3) DESCRIPTION.—The land to be conveyed to 
the city of Asotin, Washington, under this sub-
section are— 
(A) the public ball fields designated as 
Tracts 1503, 1605, 1607, 1609, 1611, 1613,
173 
1615, 1620, 1623, 1624, 1625, 1626, and 
1631; and 
(B) other leased areas designated as 
Tracts 1506, 1522, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526, 
1527, 1529, 1530, 1531, and 1563. 
(c) GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.— 
(1) SURVEY TO OBTAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.— 
The exact acreage and the legal description of any 
real property to be conveyed under this section shall 
be determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the 
Secretary. 
(2) APPLICABILITY OF PROPERTY SCREENING 
PROVISIONS.—Section 2696 of title 10, United 
States Code, shall not apply to any conveyance 
under this section. 
(3) ADDITIONAL
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS.— 
The Secretary may require that any conveyance 
under this section be subject to such additional 
terms and conditions as the Secretary considers nec-
essary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States. 
(4) COSTS
OF
CONVEYANCE.—An entity to 
which a conveyance is made under this section shall 
be responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs,
174 
including real estate transaction and environmental 
documentation costs, associated with the conveyance. 
(5) LIABILITY.—An entity to which a convey-
ance is made under this section shall hold the 
United States harmless from any liability with re-
spect to activities carried out, on or after the date 
of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. 
The United States shall remain responsible for any 
liability with respect to activities carried out, before 
such date, on the real property conveyed. 
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. AUTHORIZATION OF FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDIES. 
The following final feasibility studies for water re-
sources development and conservation and other purposes 
are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substan-
tially in accordance with the plan, and subject to the con-
ditions, described in the respective reports designated in 
this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.—
175 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. TX, 
LA 
Sabine 
Neches 
Waterway, 
Southeast 
Texas and 
Southwest 
Louisiana 
July 22, 
2011 
$779,399,000 
$359,227,000 
2. FL 
Jacksonville 
Harbor- 
Milepoint 
April 30, 
2012 
$27,804,000 
$9,122,000 
3. GA 
Savannah 
Harbor 
Expansion 
Project 
Aug. 17, 
2012 
$461,000,000 
$201,000,000 
4. TX 
Freeport 
Harbor 
Jan. 7, 
2013 
$121,132,000 
$116,342,000 
5. FL 
Canaveral 
Harbor 
(Sect 203 
Sponsor 
Report) 
Feb. 25, 
2013 
$28,652,000 
$11,588,000 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Federal 
Cost 
E. 
Estimated 
Non-Federal 
Cost 
1. KS 
Topeka 
Aug. 24, 
2009 
$15,494,000 
$8,343,000 
2. CA 
American 
River Wa-
tershed, 
Common 
Features 
Project, 
Natomas 
Basin 
Dec. 30, 
2010 
$943,300,000 
$479,500,000
179 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, 
Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida, au-
thorized by section 1001(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1052), is modi-
fied to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $152,510,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $92,007,000 and a non-Fed-
eral cost of $60,503,000. 
(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) shall take 
effect on November 8, 2007. 
(b) LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN (CADY MARSH 
DITCH), INDIANA.—The project for flood control, Little 
Calumet River Basin (Cady Marsh Ditch), Indiana, au-
thorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), and modified by 
section 127 of Public Law 109–103 (119 Stat. 2259), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $269,988,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $202,800,000 and a non-Federal 
cost of $67,188,000. 
Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 
2013. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 3080 
AN ACT 
To provide for improvements to the rivers and har-
bors of the United States, to provide for the con-
servation and development of water and related 
resources, and for other purposes.