datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(A) post the analysis under paragraph (1) 
as a link on the main page of the public Inter-
net Web site of the Environmental Protection 
Agency; and 
(B) request that the Governor of any State 
experiencing more than a de minimis negative 
impact post such analysis in the Capitol of such 
State. 
(b) PUBLIC HEARINGS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—If the Administrator con-
cludes under subsection (a)(1) that a covered action 
will have more than a de minimis negative impact on 
employment levels or economic activity in a State, 
the Administrator shall hold a public hearing in each 
such State at least 30 days prior to the effective 
date of the covered action. 
(2) TIME, LOCATION, AND SELECTION.—A pub-
lic hearing required under paragraph (1) shall be 
held at a convenient time and location for impacted 
residents. In selecting a location for such a public 
hearing, the Administrator shall give priority to loca-
tions in the State that will experience the greatest 
number of job losses. 
(c) NOTIFICATION.—If the Administrator concludes 
under subsection (a)(1) that a covered action will have 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:57 May 16, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1948.IH
H1948
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 131
Establishing procedures making the transmission of the continuing resolution
(H.J. Res. 134) to the President contingent upon the submission by
the President of a 7-year balanced budget using updated economic and
technical assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1996
Mr. KASICH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred
to the Committee on Rules
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Establishing procedures making the transmission of the con-
tinuing resolution (H.J. Res. 134) to the President con-
tingent upon the submission by the President of a 7-
year balanced budget using updated economic and tech-
nical assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE.
The Committee on House Oversight (pursuant to
clause 4(d)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Rep-
resentatives) shall not present to the President the joint
resolution (H.J. Res. 134) making further continuing ap-
•HCON 131 IH
propriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other pur-
poses, until the Speaker of the House notifies that com-
mittee that the requirements of this concurrent resolution
have been met.
SEC. 2. PRESIDENT’S SUBMISSION OF 7-YEAR BALANCED
BUDGET.
The Speaker shall submit to the Committee on House
Oversight the notification described in section 1 only if
the following conditions have been satisfied:
(1) The President has submitted to the Con-
gress a plan to achieve a balanced total budget not
later than fiscal year 2002, which includes the fol-
lowing:
(A) The proposed text of a budget plan for
fiscal year 1996 and each fiscal year thereafter
through fiscal year 2002 that includes total new
budget authority and budget outlays, total Fed-
eral revenues, and new budget authority and
budget outlays for each major functional cat-
egory, including a breakdown between discre-
tionary and mandatory spending within each
such category.
(B) The proposed text of legislation to im-
plement the budget described in subparagraph
(A).
•HCON 131 IH
(C) A detailed summary setting forth the
policies underlying the budget described in sub-
paragraph (A) and the proposed legislation de-
scribed in subparagraph (B).
(2) The Director of the Congressional Budget
Office has certified in writing to the Speaker of the
House and the President pro tempore of the Senate
that the plan described in paragraph (1) achieves a
balanced total budget not later than fiscal year
2002, as estimated by the Director using the eco-
nomic and technical assumptions specified in or con-
sistent with the Congressional Budget Office Memo-
randum entitled ‘‘The Economic and Budget Out-
look: December 1995 Update’’.
SEC. 3. SUBMISSION OF COPY OF CONCURRENT RESOLU-
TION TO PRESIDENT.
Upon the adoption of this concurrent resolution, the
Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a
copy to the President.
Æ
III
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 131
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JANUARY 5 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 1996
Received
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Establishing procedures making the transmission of the con-
tinuing resolution (H.J. Res. 134) to the President con-
tingent upon the submission by the President of a 7-
year balanced budget using updated economic and tech-
nical assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring),
SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE.
The Committee on House Oversight (pursuant to
clause 4(d)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Rep-
HCON 131 RDS
resentatives) shall not present to the President the joint
resolution (H.J. Res. 134) making further continuing ap-
propriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other pur-
poses, until the Speaker of the House notifies that com-
mittee that the requirements of this concurrent resolution
have been met.
SEC. 2. PRESIDENT’S SUBMISSION OF 7-YEAR BALANCED
BUDGET.
The Speaker shall submit to the Committee on House
Oversight the notification described in section 1 only if
the following conditions have been satisfied:
(1) The President has submitted to the Con-
gress a plan to achieve a balanced total budget not
later than fiscal year 2002, which includes the fol-
lowing:
(A) The proposed text of a budget plan for
fiscal year 1996 and each fiscal year thereafter
through fiscal year 2002 that includes total new
budget authority and budget outlays, total Fed-
eral revenues, and new budget authority and
budget outlays for each major functional cat-
egory, including a breakdown between discre-
tionary and mandatory spending within each
such category.
HCON 131 RDS
(B) The proposed text of legislation to im-
plement the budget described in subparagraph
(A).
(C) A detailed summary setting forth the
policies underlying the budget described in sub-
paragraph (A) and the proposed legislation de-
scribed in subparagraph (B).
(2) The Director of the Congressional Budget
Office has certified in writing to the Speaker of the
House and the President pro tempore of the Senate
that the plan described in paragraph (1) achieves a
balanced total budget not later than fiscal year
2002, as estimated by the Director using the eco-
nomic and technical assumptions specified in or con-
sistent with the congressional Budget Office Memo-
randum entitled ‘‘The Economic and Budget Out-
look: December 1995 Update’’.
HCON 131 RDS
SEC. 3. SUBMISSION OF COPY OF CONCURRENT RESOLU-
TION TO PRESIDENT.
Upon the adoption of this concurrent resolution, the
Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a
copy to the President.
Passed the House of Representatives January 5,
1996.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 132
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Relating to the trial of Martin Pang for arson and
felony murder.
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 132
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang intentionally started
a warehouse fire in Seattle, Washington on January 5,
1995, that killed four firefighters;
Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil from
where he was extradited to the United States on March
1, 1996;
Whereas the extradition decision of the Supreme Court of
Brazil states that Martin Pang should stand trial in the
•HCON 132 EH
United States only for arson and not for felony murder;
and
Whereas it is accepted international practice in extradition
cases for the executive authorities of the requested state
to grant consent for prosecution of offenses other than
those for which the fugitive was extradited: Now, there-
fore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that in
the interests of justice and furthering good relations be-
tween the United States and Brazil, the Government of
Brazil should grant its consent to prosecution of Martin
Pang for both arson and felony murder.
Passed the House of Representatives September 24,
1996.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. Con. Res. 132
Agreed to September 25, 1996
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six
Concurrent Resolution
Relating to the trial of Martin Pang for arson and felony murder.
Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang intentionally started a
warehouse fire in Seattle, Washington on January 5, 1995, that
killed four firefighters;
Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil from where
he was extradited to the United States on March 1, 1996;
Whereas the extradition decision of the Supreme Court of Brazil
states that Martin Pang should stand trial in the United States
only for arson and not for felony murder; and
Whereas it is accepted international practice in extradition cases
for the executive authorities of the requested state to grant con-
sent for prosecution of offenses other than those for which the
fugitive was extradited: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concur-
ring), That it is the sense of the Congress that in the interests
of justice and furthering good relations between the United States
and Brazil, the Government of Brazil should grant its consent
to prosecution of Martin Pang for both arson and felony murder.
Attest:
Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Attest:
Secretary of the Senate.
IV
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 132
Relating to the extradition of Martin Pang from Brazil to the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1996
Ms. DUNN of Washington submitted the following concurrent resolution; which
was referred to the Committee on International Relations
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Relating to the extradition of Martin Pang from Brazil to
the United States.
Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang started a warehouse
fire in Seattle, Washington on January 5, 1995, that
killed four firefighters;
Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil where
he currently awaits extradition to the United States on
charges of arson and first degree murder;
Whereas the extradition orders of the Government of Brazil
state that Martin Pang should stand trial in the United
States only for arson and not for first degree murder;
and
Whereas nothing under international law prevents the Gov-
ernment of Brazil from extraditing Martin Pang to the
•HCON 132 IH
United States to stand trial for both arson and first de-
gree murder: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that, in
the interests of furthering good relations between the
United States and Brazil, the Government of Brazil
should reverse its extradition orders relating to Martin
Pang and allow Martin Pang to be extradited to the Unit-
ed States to stand trial for both arson and first degree
murder.
Æ
HR 1949 RFS
term in section 103 of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1003). 
(2) FIRST GENERATION COLLEGE STUDENT.— 
The term ‘‘first generation college student’’ has the 
meaning given the term in section 402A(h) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a– 
11(h)). 
(3) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 
term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 
meaning given the term in section 102 of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002), except 
that such term does not include institutions de-
scribed in subsection (a)(1)(C) of such section 102. 
(4) SECONDARY
SCHOOL.—The term ‘‘sec-
ondary school’’ has the meaning given the term in 
section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu-
cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 
(5) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of Education. 
(6) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the mean-
ing given the term in section 103 of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1003). 
(7) STUDENT.—The term ‘‘student’’ includes— 
(A) a prospective student; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:24 May 24, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1949.RFS
H1949
smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 132
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEPTEMBER 25, 1996
Received
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Relating to the trial of Martin Pang for arson and felony
murder.
Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang intentionally started
a warehouse fire in Seattle, Washington on January 5,
1995, that killed four firefighters;
Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil from
where he was extradited to the United States on March
1, 1996;
Whereas the extradition decision of the Supreme Court of
Brazil states that Martin Pang should stand trial in the
HCON 132 RDS
United States only for arson and not for felony murder;
and
Whereas it is accepted international practice in extradition
cases for the executive authorities of the requested state
to grant consent for prosecution of offenses other than
those for which the fugitive was extradited: Now, there-
fore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that in
the interests of justice and furthering good relations be-
tween the United States and Brazil, the Government of
Brazil should grant its consent to prosecution of Martin
Pang for both arson and felony murder.
Passed the House of Representatives September 24,
1996.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
IV
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 133
Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 9 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1996
Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
considered and agreed to
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That when the House adjourns on the cal-
endar day of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, it stand ad-
journed until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or
until noon on the second day after Members are notified
to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res-
olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate
recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday,
January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad-
journed until noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas-
HCON 133 ATH
semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,
whichever occurs first.
SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority
Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with
the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead-
er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in
their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Æ
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 133
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 133
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That when the House adjourns on the cal-
endar day of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, it stand ad-
journed until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or
until noon on the second day after Members are notified
to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res-
olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate
recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday,
January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the
•HCON 133 EH
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad-
journed until noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas-
semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,
whichever occurs first.
SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority
Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with
the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead-
er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in
their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 9
(legislative day, January 5), 1996.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. Con. Res. 133
Agreed to January 10, 1996
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six
Concurrent Resolution
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concur-
ring), That when the House adjourns on the calendar day of Tues-
day, January 9, 1996, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday,
January 22, 1996, or until noon on the second day after Members
are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate
recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday, January
10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the Majority Leader
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Mon-
day, January 22, 1996, or until noon on the second day after
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader
of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority
Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall
notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall
warrant it.
Attest:
Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Attest:
Secretary of the Senate.
III
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 133
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JANUARY 10, 1996
Received
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), That when the House adjourns on the cal-
endar day of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, it stand ad-
journed until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or
until noon on the second day after Members are notified
to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res-
olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate
recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday,
January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the
HCON 133 RDS
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad-
journed until noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas-
semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,
whichever occurs first.
SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority
Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with
the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead-
er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in
their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 9
(legislative day, January 5), 1996.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
IV
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 134
Condemning the court-martial of Specialist Michael New of the United States
Army in response to his refusal to wear on his military uniform the
insignia of the United Nations and calling on the President to vindicate
this courageous young man, override his conviction, and restore him
to a place of honor in the Army.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 25, 1996
Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. FUNDERBURK,
Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CRANE, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr.
COBLE, 
Mr. 
PACKARD, 
Mr. 
TAYLOR
of 
North 
Carolina, 
Mr.
HOSTETTLER, Mrs. SEASTRAND, Mr. WAMP, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr.
STOCKMAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on National Security
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Condemning the court-martial of Specialist Michael New of
the United States Army in response to his refusal to
wear on his military uniform the insignia of the United
Nations and calling on the President to vindicate this
courageous young man, override his conviction, and re-
store him to a place of honor in the Army.
Whereas section 6 of the United Nations Participation Act of
1945 (22 U.S.C. 287d) prohibits the use of the Armed
Forces of the United States in United Nations deploy-
ments unless Congress approves of the participation
•HCON 134 IH
agreement in advance by appropriate Act or joint resolu-
tion;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States (Article I,
Section 9) and section 7342 of title 5, United States
Code, prohibit members of the Armed Forces from receiv-
ing badges or insignia from a foreign government, includ-
ing any international or multinational organization whose
members include any unit of foreign government, without
the consent of Congress;
Whereas Congress has never approved a United Nations de-
ployment under section 6 of the United Nations Partici-
pation Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C. 287d);
Whereas Congress has never approved the use of any insignia
of the United Nations on uniforms of members of the
Armed Forces; and
Whereas, despite the preceding introductory clauses, Army
Specialist Michael New, an American hero, has been con-
victed by court-martial for refusing to accept foreign
United Nations commanders and wear on his military
uniform the insignia of the United Nations: Now, there-
fore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate
concurring), that Congress condemns the groundless
court-martial of Specialist Michael New of the United
States Army in response to his refusal to accept foreign
United Nations commanders and wear on his military uni-
form the insignia of the United Nations and calls on the
President, as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces,
to vindicate the principles under which Specialist New
•HCON 134 IH
made his refusal and to take such action as may be avail-
able to the President to override the conviction of Special-
ist New and restore his status with a place of honor in
the Army.
Æ