159
HR 4650 PP
(e) This section shall take effect on October 1, 1994,
and shall apply to months that begin on or after that date
and before October 1, 1995, upon authorization in an Act
other than this Act.
Ω189æSEC. 8129. IMPLEMENTATION OF AGREEMENT ON THE
RESTRUCTURING OF THE ARMY NATIONAL
GUARD AND THE ARMY RESERVE.
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the implementation
of the off-site agreement may result in the loss to the Armed
Forces of military personnel who have significant military
experience and expertise.
(b) REASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERS.—(1) To the maxi-
mum extent practicable, the Secretary of the Army shall
ensure that members of the Armed Forces who would other-
wise be separated from service as a result of the deactivation
of military units of the Army National Guard and the
Army Reserve under the off-site agreement be reassigned in-
stead to units that are not being deactivated.
(2) The reassignment of a member under paragraph
(1) shall not affect the grade or rank in grade of the mem-
ber.
(c) REPORTS.—Not later than 15 days after the end
of each calendar quarter while the off-site agreement is in
effect, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the number of mem-
160
HR 4650 PP
bers of the Armed Forces who were reassigned under sub-
section (b)(1) during the preceding calendar quarter.
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) The term ‘‘congressional defense committees’’
means the Committees on Armed Services and the
Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the
House of Representatives.
(2) The term ‘‘off-site agreement’’ means the
agreement on the restructuring of the Army National
Guard and the Army Reserve.
Ω190æSEC. 8130. No funds appropriated under this
Act may be obligated or expended for the purpose of estab-
lishing the Antler Military Operations Area, Pennsylvania,
for the purpose of conducting aerial combat training oper-
ations until Region III of the Environmental Protection
Agency has completed its currently ongoing Environmental
Impact Review.
Ω191æSEC. 8131. (a) No project for the construction
of any facility, or improvement to any facility, having an
estimated Federal cost in excess of $300,000, may be under-
taken in any fiscal year unless specifically identified as a
separate item in the President’s annual fiscal year budget
request or otherwise specifically authorized and appro-
priated if such facility or improvement would be used pri-
marily by personnel of the intelligence community.
161
HR 4650 PP
(b) As used in this section, the term ‘‘intelligence com-
munity’’ has the same meaning given that term in section
3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
401a(4)).
Ω192æSEC. 8132. Of the funds made available by this
Act for the National Reconnaissance Office under the classi-
fied Schedule of Appropriations accompanying this Act,
funds allocated for construction of the headquarters build-
ings of the National Reconnaissance Office which were un-
obligated as of the date of enactment of this Act may not
be obligated or expended until the Director of Central Intel-
ligence and the Secretary of Defense have completed a re-
view of that construction project and the results of such re-
view have been disclosed to the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
Ω193æSEC. 8133. Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, the Secretary of the Navy shall obligate, within
thirty days of this Act becoming law, not less than
$29,750,000 from the funds appropriated in this Act or pre-
vious Acts under the heading ‘‘Aircraft Procurement,
Navy’’, solely to procure, on an urgent basis, AN/USH–42
mission recorders modified for use in S–3B aircraft.
162
HR 4650 PP
Ω194æSEC. 8134. Within 60 days of enactment of this
Act, the President, in consultation with NATO, shall submit
a report to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate
and House of Representatives defining specific military,
economic, and political standards required to gain admis-
sion to NATO: Provided, That such report shall not be lim-
ited to the principles enunciated in the Partnership for
Peace: Provided further, That such report shall include an
assessment of measures which would be necessary to guaran-
tee the armed services of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Re-
public, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are capa-
ble of military cooperation and interoperability with NATO
and fulfilling other member responsibilities.
Ω195æRESTRICTION ON FUNDING UNITED STATES
MILITARY PERSONNEL IN SOMALIA
SEC. 8135. None of the funds appropriated by this Act
may be used for the continuous presence in Somalia of
United States military personnel after September 30, 1994.
Ω196æSEC. 
8136. 
SENATE 
ADVICE 
AND 
CONSENT 
TO
CHANGES IN OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CFE
TREATY.
(a) FINDINGS.—
(1) On November 25, 1991, the Senate gave its
advice and consent to ratification of the CFE Treaty.
163
HR 4650 PP
(2) The President would need to seek the Senate’s
advice and consent to any change in obligation of the
States parties under the CFE Treaty, unless such
change were a minor matter of an administrative or
technical nature.
(3) A change in the allowed holdings of treaty
limited equipment in the area of application or any
geographic sub-zone of the area of application would
constitute a change in obligation for which the Sen-
ate’s advice and consent would be required.
(b) REAFFIRMATION
OF SENATE’S TREATY-MAKING
POWERS.—The President shall submit for the Senate’s ad-
vice and consent any change in the obligations of any State
party under the CFE Treaty, unless such change is a minor
matter of an administrative or technical nature.
(c) CFE TREATY DEFINED.—For the purpose of this
section, the CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional
Armed Forces in Europe, signed in Paris on November 19,
1990, and associated protocols.
Ω197æSEC. 8137. (a)(1) The Secretary of Defense shall
develop a plan for establishing and implementing a require-
ment for disbursing officials of the Department of Defense
to match disbursements to particular obligations before
making the disbursements. The Secretary shall transmit the
plan to Congress not later than March 1, 1995.
164
HR 4650 PP
(2) The Inspector General of the Department of Defense
shall review the plan and submit the Inspector General’s
independent assessment of the plan to the congressional de-
fense committees.
(b)(1) Not later than July 1, 1995, the Secretary of
Defense shall require that each disbursement by the Depart-
ment of Defense in an amount in excess of $5,000,000 be
matched to a particular obligation before the disbursement
is made.
(2) Not later than October 1, 1995, the Secretary of
Defense shall require that each disbursement by the Depart-
ment of Defense in an amount in excess of $1,000,000 be
matched to a particular obligation before the disbursement
is made.
(c) The Secretary shall ensure that a disbursement in
excess of the threshold amount applicable under subsection
(b) is not divided into multiple disbursements of less than
that amount for the purpose of avoiding the applicability
of such subsection to that disbursement.
(d) The Secretary of Defense may waive a requirement
for advance matching of a disbursement of the Department
of Defense with a particular obligation in the case of (1)
a disbursement involving deployed forces, (2) a disburse-
ment for an operation in a war declared by Congress or
a national emergency declared by the President or Congress,
165
HR 4650 PP
or (3) a disbursement under any other circumstances for
which the waiver is necessary in the national security inter-
ests of the United States, as determined by the Secretary
and certified by the Secretary to the congressional defense
committees.
(e) This section shall not be construed to limit the au-
thority of the Secretary of Defense to require that a dis-
bursement not in excess of the amount applicable under sub-
section (b) be matched to a particular obligation before the
disbursement is made.
Ω198æSEC. 8138. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NEGOTIATION OF
LIMITATIONS ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS TEST-
ING.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
(1) On January 25, 1994, the United States
joined with 37 other nations to begin negotiations for
a comprehensive treaty to ban permanently all nu-
clear weapons testing.
(2) On March 14, 1994, the President decided to
extend the current United States nuclear testing mor-
atorium at least through September 1995.
(3) Germany and the Group of 21 Non-Aligned
States have publicly stated their support for the com-
pletion of a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty by
1995.
166
HR 4650 PP
(4) On June 6, 1994, the People’s Republic of
China conducted its second nuclear weapons test ex-
plosion since the United States, Russia, and France
initiated their current nuclear test moratoria.
(5) On September 7, 1994, the third and final
test ban negotiating session of the year will end.
(6) While some progress toward a comprehensive
nuclear test ban treaty has been achieved, there is lit-
tle chance that an agreement will be reached before
April 1995 at the current rate of negotiation.
(7) The United States is seeking to extend indefi-
nitely the Non-Proliferation Treaty at the April 1995
Extension Conference.
(8) Conclusion of a comprehensive nuclear test
ban treaty could contribute toward successful negotia-
tions to extend the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
(9) Agreements to eliminate nuclear testing and
control the spread of nuclear weapons could contrib-
ute to national security of the United States, its al-
lies, and other nations around the world.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—The Congress—
(1) applauds the President for maintaining the
United States nuclear testing moratorium and for
supporting the negotiation of a comprehensive nuclear
test ban treaty;
167
HR 4650 PP
(2) encourages the People’s Republic of China
and all other nuclear powers to refrain from conduct-
ing nuclear explosions prior to conclusion of a com-
prehensive nuclear test ban treaty; and
(3) urges the President and the other nuclear
powers to take measures necessary to achieve a multi-
lateral comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty before
the Non-Proliferation Treaty Extension Conference.
(c) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term
‘‘Non-Proliferation Treaty’’ means the Treaty on the Non-
Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington,
London, and Moscow on July 1, 1968 (21 U.S.T. 483).
Ω199æSEC. 8139. (a) Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision of law, the Secretary of a military department may
enter into a contract for use of commercial or proprietary
credit card services for augmenting or replacing any in-
house 
account 
receivable 
system 
in 
use 
by 
a
nonappropriated fund instrumentality under the jurisdic-
tion of that Secretary if the Secretary determines that such
contract is in the best interest of that department.
(b) No official of the Department of Defense outside
a military department may, by regulation or otherwise,
limit or control the exercise of authority under this section
by the Secretary of that military department.
168
HR 4650 PP
Ω200æSEC. 8140. (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds appro-
priated under this Act may be made available to the Demo-
cratic People’s Republic of Korea until the President cer-
tifies and reports to Congress that the Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea—
(1) does not possess nuclear weapons;
(2) has halted its nuclear weapons program; and
(3) is not exporting weapons-grade plutonium.
(b) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.—The President
may waive the prohibition in this section if he determines
and certifies in writing to the Congress that to do so is
vital to the national security interest of the United States,
and notifies the appropriate committees of Congress 15 days
in advance in accordance with the regular notification pro-
cedures of such committees. Such notification shall include
the nature, purpose and amount of any proposed assistance.
Ω201æSEC. 8141. Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, within the funds made availability by this Act,
the Department of Defense shall pay the appropriate
amount of Aviation Continuation Pay authorized by 37
U.S.C. Sec. 301(b) to the survivors of persons who have
signed reenlistment contracts on or after January 1, 1994,
but whose service connected death predates the effective date
of such reenlistment contract by less than 14 days.
169
HR 4650 PP
Ω202æSEC. 8142. It is the sense of the Senate that not
later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, the De-
partment of Defense shall submit all documents pertaining
to any and all Department of Defense chemical and biologi-
cal warfare tests involving the use of zinc cadmium sulfide
conducted anywhere in the United States.
Ω203æSEC. 8143. None of the funds made available
under this Act may be obligated or expended for the reloca-
tion or reduction of the functions specified in the 1991 and
1993 Reports to the President of the Defense Base Closure
and Realignment Commission to be maintained at Fort
Chaffee, Arkansas, including all civilian management, sup-
port personnel and operations associated with these func-
tions that were in existence as of September 30, 1994.
Ω204æSEC. 8144. (a) None of the funds available to
the Department of Defense during fiscal year 1995 may be
used for negotiating or entering into any agreement with,
nor for accepting funds from, a foreign government or an
entity controlled by a foreign government for a joint pro-
gram for the development of an advanced threat radar
jammer for combat helicopters until 30 days after the Sec-
retary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of
State, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the
Defense Security Assistance Agency, conducts a comprehen-
170
HR 4650 PP
sive review of the program and submits a report on the re-
sults of that review to the congressional defense committees.
(b) This section does not apply with respect to a major
ally of the United States.
(c) In this section:
(1) The term ‘‘entity controlled by a foreign gov-
ernment’’ includes—
(A) any domestic or foreign organization or
corporation that is effectively owned or con-
trolled by a foreign government; and
(B) any individual acting on behalf of a
foreign government,
as determined by the Secretary of Defense. Such term
does not include an organization or corporation that
is owned, but is not controlled, either directly or indi-
rectly, by a foreign government if the ownership of
that organization or corporation by that foreign gov-
ernment was effective before October 23, 1992.
(2) The term ‘‘major ally of the United States’’
has the meaning given such term in section
2350a(i)(2) of title 10, United States Code.
Ω205æSEC. 8145. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING
LOWRY AFB.
It is the sense of the Senate that—
171
HR 4650 PP
(1) in issuing any lease, permit or deed of con-
veyance for use to assist the homeless under the Stew-
art B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act concerning
Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, the Secretary of
Health and Human Services, representatives of the
city of Denver, Colorado, representatives of the city of
Aurora, Colorado and representatives of homeless pro-
viders whose applications have been approved by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services should
jointly determine that such use is reasonable under
the redevelopment plan for Lowry Air Force Base,
Colorado; and
(2) the Department of Defense and the Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services, in coordination
with the appropriate committees of Congress and ap-
propriate State and local authorities, should develop
a reform proposal to address the many difficulties
created for local communities by existing laws relat-
ing to the loan, lease or conveyance for use of govern-
ment property during the base closure process.
Ω206æSEC. 8146. (a) None of the funds appropriated
in this Act for a second low rate initial production (LRIP)
contract or contract option for the Hunter unmanned aerial
vehicle (UAV) system may be obligated until the Depart-
172
HR 4650 PP
ment of Defense certifies to the congressional defense com-
mittees that—
(1) two Hunter UAV systems have been accepted
by the Government using the currently defined Ac-
ceptance Test Procedure;
(2) the operational tempo (OPTEMPO) phase of
the risk reduction program has been successfully com-
pleted; and
(3) the flight test portion of the first article test
(FAT) has been successfully completed.
(b) None of the funds appropriated in this Act may
be obligated to procure more than four Hunter UAV systems
until the Logistics Support Analysis (LSA) report has been
submitted to the relevant committees of Congress and the
Department of Defense has certified to these committees that
the LSA is sufficient to fully support fielding of the Hunter
UAV.
Ω207æSEC. 8147. It is the sense of the Senate that of
the funds appropriated by title VIII of Public Law 102–
396 (106 Stat. 1899) for defense reinvestment for economic
growth, the unobligated balance of the funds made available
by such title for military service members occupational con-
version and training shall remain available until Septem-
ber 30, 1995.
173
HR 4650 PP
Ω208æSEC. 8148. (a) Sense of the Senate concerning
Japan fulfilling its commitments under the Host Nation
Support Agreement it signed with the United States on
January 14, 1991:
(b) The Senate finds—
(1) That, the United States-Japan Security
Treaty continues to be a strong bond between our two
countries, serving as a main pillar of the bilateral re-
lationship;
(2) That, the bilateral relationship is of vital im-
portance to both countries and to the stability of the
Asia Pacific region and the entire world;
(3) That, Japan’s willingness to share the costs
of maintaining forces in Japan is an important con-
tribution to strengthening our security partnership;
(4) That, it has often been asserted that Japan’s
host nation support for American forces provides a
model defense burden-sharing arrangement for our al-
lies;
(5) That, Japan and the United States signed a
new Host Nation Support Agreement on January 14,
1991, providing for Japan to assume—over five years
beginning in Japanese Fiscal Year 1991 and ending
in fiscal year 1995—virtually all yen-based costs of
maintaining United States forces in Japan;
174
HR 4650 PP
(6) That, Japan voluntarily entered into that
agreement more than a year before the expiration of
the previous Host Nation Support Agreement which
was not as generous;
(7) That, the Government of Japan hailed the
new agreement as ‘‘a step of great significance for the
overall relationship between the two countries’’;
(8) That, Japan’s Defense Agency appears to
have decided to decrease expenses for bearing the cost
of stationing United States forces in Japan in its fis-
cal year 1995 budget request, thereby failing to fulfill
its obligations under the 1991 Host Nation Support
Agreement;
(9) That, should Japan fail to fulfill those obli-
gations, the bilateral relationship may suffer negative
consequences, particularly as current problems on the
Korean peninsula pose a critical challenge to United
States-Japan security ties: Now, therefore
(c) It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) It is in the interest of both Japan and the
United States to fully comply with all the provisions
of the Host Nation Support Agreement of 1991; and
(2) Should either nation wish to depart from
fully complying with all the provisions of that agree-
175
HR 4650 PP
ment, it should engage in close consultations with its
counterpart before taking any action.
Ω209æSEC. 8149. None of the funds appropriated in
this Act may be transferred to or obligated from the Penta-
gon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund, unless the
Secretary of Defense certifies that the total cost for the plan-
ning design, construction and installation of equipment for
the renovation of the Pentagon Reservation will not exceed
$1,218,000,000.
Ω210æSEC. 8150. BOSNIA AND HERCEGOVINA.
(a) PURPOSE.—To express the sense of Congress con-
cerning the international efforts to end the conflict in
Bosnia and Hercegovina, and to establish a process to end
the arms embargo on the Government of Bosnia and
Hercegovina.
(b) STATEMENT OF SUPPORT.—The Congress supports
the efforts of the so-called ‘‘contact group’’ composed of rep-
resentatives of the United States, Russia, France, Britain,
and Germany to bring about a peaceful settlement of the
conflict in Bosnia and Hercegovina based upon the con-
tact’s group proposal of July 6, 1994 that has been agreed
to by the Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina and re-
jected by the Bosnian Serb faction.
(c) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the
Congress that:
176
HR 4650 PP
(1) The United States should work with the
NATO Member nations and other permanent Members
of the United Nations Security Council to bring about
a peaceful settlement of the conflict in Bosnia and
Hercegovina which maintains the territorial integrity
of Bosnia and Hercegovina.
(2) A peaceful settlement of the conflict must pre-
serve an economically, politically and militarily via-
ble Bosnian state capable of exercising its rights
under the United Nations Charter as part of a peace-
ful settlement, including the lifting of the arms em-
bargo on the Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina
so that it can exercise the inherent right of a sov-
ereign state to self-defense.
(3) The acceptance of the contact group’s peace
proposal 
by 
the 
Government 
of 
Bosnia 
and
Hercegovina should lead to the lifting of the inter-
national arms embargo on that Government.
(4) In providing weapons to the Bosnian Gov-
ernment or taking other actions, care should be taken
to provide for the safety of the United Nations Protec-
tion Force (UNPROFOR) and the civilian personnel
working for the United Nations or non-governmental
volunteer organizations.
177
HR 4650 PP
(5) The United States should immediately seek to
organize an international effort to provide assistance
to the nations bordering Serbia and Montenegro to
bring about more effective enforcement by those na-
tions of the international economic sanctions on the
Government of Serbia and Montenegro.
(d) POLICY.—The United States should exercise leader-
ship within the international community to cause the
Bosnian Serb faction to accept the contact’s group’s pro-
posal. Such action should be taken on separate but com-
plimentary international and unilateral tracks. Accord-
ingly:
(1) International: If the Bosnian Serbs have not
accepted the contact group’s proposal of July 6, 1994
within 10 days after the enactment of this Act or by
October 15, 1994, whichever is later, the President or
his representative should formally introduce and sup-
port a resolution in the United Nations Security
Council, within fourteen days thereafter, to terminate
the international arms embargo on the Government of
Bosnia and Hercegovina. The termination of the
arms embargo on the Government of Bosnia and
Hercegovina may be accomplished in stages but
should result in a lifting of the arms embargo no later
than December 1, 1994.
178
HR 4650 PP
(2) Unilateral: If the United Nations Security
Council has not voted to lift the international arms
embargo 
on 
the 
Government 
of 
Bosnia 
and
Hercegovina in accordance with paragraph (1) with-
in 15 days after the President or his representative
has formally introduced such a resolution or by No-
vember 15, 1994, whichever is earlier, and the
Bosnian Serbs have not accepted the contact group’s
proposal of July 6, 1994 by that date:
(A) None of the funds available to the De-
partment of Defense for any fiscal year shall
thereafter be used for the purpose of participa-
tion in, support for, or assistance to the enforce-
ment of the arms embargo on the Government of
Bosnia and Hercegovina but the President may
waive this provision in the case of United States
military personnel serving in NATO head-
quarters staff positions. Nothing in this provi-
sion is intended to impede sanctions enforcement
against Serbia;
(B) The President shall submit a plan to
and consult with the Congress on the manner in
which the Armed Forces of the United States and
other friendly nations would provide training to
the armed forces of the Government of Bosnia
179
HR 4650 PP
and Hercegovina outside of the territory of
Bosnia and Hercegovina; and
(C) The President shall submit a plan to
and consult with the Congress regarding unilat-
eral lifting by the United States of the arms em-
bargo on the Government of Bosnia and
Hercegovina.
(3) Interim: If the Bosnian Serb faction attacks
the United Nations declared safe areas, the President
or his representative should promptly introduce and
support a resolution in the United Nations Security
Council that authorizes a selective lifting of the arms
embargo 
on 
the 
Government 
of 
Bosnia 
and
Hercegovina to provide defensive weapons, such as
anti-tank weapons, counter-battery radars, and mor-
tars, to enable the forces of the Government of Bosnia
and Hercegovina to defend the safe areas.
Ω211æSEC. 8151. TERMINATION
OF ARMS EMBAR-
GO.—
(1) TERMINATION.—The President shall termi-
nate the United States arms embargo of the Govern-
ment of Bosnia and Herzegovina no later than No-
vember 15, 1994 so that government may exercise its
right of self-defense under Article 51 of the United
Nations Charter.
180
HR 4650 PP
(2) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the
term ‘‘United States arms embargo of the Government
of Bosnia and Herzegovina’’ means the application to
the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina of—
(A) the policy adopted July 10, 1991, and
published in the Federal Register of July 19,
1991 (58 F.R. 33322) under the heading ‘‘Sus-
pension of Munitions Export Licenses to Yugo-
slavia’’; and
(B) any similar policy being applied by the
United States Government as of the date of re-
ceipt of the request described in paragraph (1)
pursuant to request described in paragraph (1)
pursuant to which approval is denied for trans-
fers of defense articles and defense services to the
former Yugoslavia.
(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this
section shall be interpreted as authorization for de-
ployment of United States forces in the territory of
Bosnia and Herzegovina for any purpose, including
training, support, or delivery of military equipment.
Ω212æSEC. 8152. (a) Of the funds appropriated under
the heading ‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Navy’’ in title IV of this Act, $3,900,000 shall be made
181
HR 4650 PP
available only for the Joint Primary Aircraft Training
System (JPATS) program.
(b) Of the funds appropriated under the heading ‘‘Re-
search, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force’’ in
title IV of this Act, $37,057,000 shall be made available
only for the JPATS program.
(c) Of the funds appropriated under the heading ‘‘Air-
craft Procurement, Air Force’’ in title III of this Act,
$78,265,000 shall be made available only for the JPATS
program.
Ω213æSEC. 8153. No funds appropriated by this Act
may be obligated or expended during fiscal year 1995 for
retiring, or preparing to retire, any B–52H, B–1B, or F–
111 bomber aircraft.
Ω214æThis Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of
Defense Appropriations Act, 1995’’.
Titles I through VIII of this Act may be cited as the
‘‘Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1995’’.
TITLE IX—FISCAL YEAR 1994 SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATION
The following sum is appropriated, out of any money
in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1994, namely:
182
HR 4650 PP
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
MANAGEMENT FUNDS
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND
For the ‘‘Emergency Response Fund’’, $170,000,000:
Provided, That these funds may be used to reimburse appro-
priations of the Department of Defense for costs incurred
for emergency relief for Rwanda: Provided further, That the
Secretary of State shall provide a report to the Congress
no later than September 1, 1994, as to the burden-sharing
arrangements in the Rwanda relief operation that have been
negotiated and implemented with other nations, and inter-
national public and private organizations, as to both cost
and personnel participation, including armed forces par-
ticipation: Provided further, That the Secretary of Defense
shall provide assessments to the Congress no later than Sep-
tember 1, 1994, of (1) any threats to the security of United
States personnel, including armed forces personnel, in the
Rwanda relief operation, and (2) the extent to which the
UNAMIR peacekeeping operation has established a security
system within the country of Rwanda: Provided further,
That any change in the mission from one of strict refugee
relief to security, peace-enforcing, nation-building or any
other substantive role, shall not be implemented without the
further approval of the Congress: Provided further, That
United States armed forces shall not participate in relief