datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1159
To improve the Federal capability to deal with child exploitation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1999
Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HORN, Ms.
DUNN, Mr. SHOWS, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. CUNNINGHAM,
Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BILBRAY, and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,
and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee con-
cerned
A BILL
To improve the Federal capability to deal with child
exploitation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Children
From On-Line Predators and Exploitation Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. CHILD CYBERSMUGGLING CENTER OF THE CUS-
TOMS SERVICE.
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to the Customs Service
$10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000 to carry out the Child
Pornography/Child Sexual Exploitation Program estab-
lished by the Child Cybersmuggling Center of the Customs
Service.
(b) USE OF AMOUNTS FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
CYBER TIPLINE.—Of the amount appropriated under sub-
section (a), the Customs Service shall provide 3.75 percent
of such amount to the National Center for Missing and
Exploited Children for the operation of the child pornog-
raphy cyber tipline of the Center and for increased public
awareness of the tipline.
SEC. 3. WIRETAPPING AUTHORITY.
Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18, United States Code,
is amended by inserting ‘‘section 2423(b) (relating to trav-
el with intent to engage in sexual acts with juveniles),’’
before ‘‘section 1203’’.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1160
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to furnish headstones or markers for the marked graves of
certain individuals.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1999
Mr. KILDEE (for himself, Mr. EVANS, and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or
markers for the marked graves of certain individuals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MARKED GRAVES AS ELIGIBLE
GRAVES 
FOR 
DEPARTMENT 
FURNISHED
HEADSTONES OR MARKERS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306 of title 38, United
States Code, is amended in subsection (a), by striking out
‘‘unmarked’’.
(b) PREVIOUSLY MARKED GRAVES INELIGIBLE.—
Section 2306 of such title is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
‘‘(f)(1) In the case of the grave of an individual de-
scribed in subsection (a) that is marked before January
1, 2000, with a headstone or marker, the person entitled
under subsection (a) to request a headstone or marker for
such individual may receive from the Secretary such head-
stone or marker.
‘‘(2) The Secretary may only furnish the headstone
or marker under paragraph (1) at no cost to the United
States.’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—The amendments made
under this section shall take effect on January 1, 2000.
Æ
•HR 1162EH
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses
the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 1162
One Hundred Sixth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand
An Act
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio River
between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher
Bridge’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio
River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, shall be
known and designated as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,
or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1162
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio
River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1999
Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mrs.
NORTHUP, Mr. FLETCHER, and Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure
A BILL
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that
crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and
Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses
the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Æ
IIB
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1162
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MAY 5, 1999
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works
AN ACT
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that
crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and
Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 1162 RFS
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses
the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
IB
House Calendar No. 46
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1162
[Report No. 106–112]
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses the Ohio
River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1999
Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mrs.
NORTHUP, Mr. FLETCHER, and Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure
APRIL 27, 1999
Committed to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that
crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and
Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses
the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
House Calendar No. 46
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1162
[Report No. 106–112]
A BILL
To designate the bridge on United States Route
231 that crosses the Ohio River between Maceo,
Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘Wil-
liam H. Natcher Bridge’’.
APRIL 27, 1999
Committed to the House Calendar and ordered to be
printed
II
Calendar No. 846
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1162
IN THE SENATE OF UNITED STATES
MAY 5, 1999
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works
SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000
Reported by Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, without amendment
AN ACT
To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 that
crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and
Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The bridge on United States Route 231 that crosses
the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William
H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.
Calendar No. 846
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1162
AN ACT
To designate the bridge on United States Route
231 that crosses the Ohio River between Maceo,
Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘Wil-
liam H. Natcher Bridge’’.
SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000
Reported without amendment
I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1166
To authorize the President to enter into a trade agreement concerning North-
ern Ireland and certain border counties of the Republic of Ireland,
and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 17, 1999
Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. KING, Mr. CROWLEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New
York, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. MENENDEZ, and
Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To authorize the President to enter into a trade agreement
concerning Northern Ireland and certain border counties
of the Republic of Ireland, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) It is in the interest of the United States
that the precarious peace process now underway in
Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland suc-
ceed, both to ensure stability for important allies
HR 1167 EAS
‘‘(B) the date on which the funding agree-
ment expires; or
‘‘(2) such date as may be mutually agreed upon
by the Secretary and the Indian tribe.
‘‘(g) WITHDRAWAL.—
‘‘(1) PROCESS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An Indian tribe may
fully or partially withdraw from a participating
inter-tribal consortium or tribal organization its
share of any program, function, service, or activ-
ity (or portions thereof) included in a compact
or funding agreement.
‘‘(B) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—The withdrawal
referred to in subparagraph (A) shall become ef-
fective within the timeframe specified in the reso-
lution which authorizes transfer to the partici-
pating tribal organization or inter-tribal consor-
tium. In the absence of a specific timeframe set
forth in the resolution, such withdrawal shall be-
come effective on—
‘‘(i) the earlier of—
‘‘(I) 1 year after the date of sub-
mission of such request; or
‘‘(II) the date on which the fund-
ing agreement expires; or
within a reasonable period of time, the imple-
mentation of the principles described in sub-
paragraphs (A) through (H).
Æ
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H.R. 1167
AMENDMENTS
TO
SENATE AMENDMENT
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
July 24, 2000.
Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H.R. 1167) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to
provide for further self-governance by Indian tribes, and for
other purposes’’, with the following
AMENDMENTS:
Ω1æPage 14, line 12, strike ø(or of such other agency)¿.
Ω2æPage 15, line 1, after ‘‘functions’’ insert: so
Ω3æPage 19, line 4, after ‘‘section 106’’ insert: other pro-
visions of law,
Ω4æPage 20, line 6, strike ø305¿ and insert: 505
Ω5æPage 31, line 23, strike ømay¿ and insert: is author-
ized to
Ω6æPage 39, strike lines 7 through 14, and insert the fol-
lowing:
‘‘ ‘(g) WAGES.—All laborers and mechanics employed
by contractors and subcontractors (excluding tribes and
tribal organizations) in the construction, alteration, or re-
pair, including painting or decorating of a building or
other facilities in connection with construction projects
funded by the United States under this Act shall be paid
wages at not less than those prevailing wages on similar
construction in the locality as determined by the Secretary
of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act of March
3, 1931 (46 Stat. 1494). With respect to construction alter-
ation, or repair work to which the Act of March 3, 1931,
is applicable under this section, the Secretary of Labor shall
have the authority and functions set forth in the Reorga-
nization Plan numbered 14, of 1950, and section 2 of the
Act of June 13, 1934 (48 Stat. 948).’’.
Ω7æPage 39, strike line 24 and all that follows through
page 40, line 6, and insert the following:
‘‘ ‘Regarding construction programs or projects, the
Secretary and Indian tribes may negotiate for the inclusion
of specific provisions of the Office of Federal Procurement
and Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) and Federal acquisi-
tion regulations in any funding agreement entered into
under this part. Absent a negotiated agreement, such provi-
sions and regulatory requirements shall not apply.’’.
Ω8æPage 41, line 1, insert a comma after ‘‘Executive or-
ders’’.
Ω9æPage 49, strike lines 4 through 10.
Ω10æPage 56, beginning on line 21, strike øfor fiscal years
2000 and 2001¿.
Ω11æPage 60, line 6, strike ø(a) IN GENERAL.—¿.
Ω12æPage 60, strike lines 9 and 10.
Ω13æPage 60, strike line 16 and all that follows through
page 65, line 16.
Ω14æPage 65, line 17, strike øSEC. 13.¿ and insert: SEC.
12.
Ω15æPage 66, after line 7, insert the following:
‘‘SEC. 13. EFFECTIVE DATE.
‘‘Except as otherwise provided, the provisions of this
Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act.’’.
Attest:
Clerk.
295
HR 4818 PP 
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND 
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK RESTRICTIONS 
SEC. 5089. (a) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS BY 
OPIC.—None of the funds made available in this Act may 
be used by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation to 
insure, reinsure, guarantee, or finance any investment in 
connection with a project involving the mining, polishing 
or other processing, or sale of diamonds in a country that 
fails to meet the requirements of subsection (c). 
(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS BY THE EXPORT-
IMPORT BANK.—None of the funds made available in this 
Act may be used by the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States to guarantee, insure, extend credit, or participate in 
an extension of credit in connection with the export of any 
goods to a country for use in an enterprise involving the 
mining, polishing or other processing, or sale of diamonds 
in a country that fails to meet the requirements of sub-
section (c). 
(c) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements referred to in 
subsections (a) and (b) are that the country concerned is 
implementing the recommendations, obligations and re-
quirements developed by the Kimberley Process on conflict 
diamonds. 
SECURITY IN ASIA 
SEC. 5090. (a) Of the funds appropriated under the 
heading ‘‘Foreign Military Financing Program’’, not less
296
HR 4818 PP 
than the following amounts shall be made available to en-
hance security in Asia, consistent with democratic prin-
ciples and the rule of law—
(1) $55,000,000 for assistance for the Phil-
ippines; 
(2) $6,000,000 for assistance for Indonesia; 
(3) $2,000,000 for assistance for Bangladesh; 
(4) $1,500,000 for assistance for the Democratic 
Republic of Timor-Leste; 
(5) $2,000,000 for assistance for Mongolia; 
(6) $5,000,000 for assistance for Nepal; 
(7) $2,500,000 for assistance for Thailand; 
(8) $1,000,000 for assistance for Sri Lanka; 
(9) $1,000,000 for assistance for Cambodia; 
(10) $500,000 for assistance for Fiji; and 
(11) $250,000 for assistance for Tonga. 
(b) Funds made available for assistance for Indonesia 
pursuant to subsection (a) may be made available notwith-
standing section 5075 of this Act: Provided, That such funds 
may only be made available to the Indonesian navy for the 
purposes of enhancing maritime security: Provided further, 
That sections 5075(a)(1) and (4) of this Act shall apply 
with respect to the Indonesia navy for purposes of this sec-
tion: Provided further, That such funds shall only be made
tives, a general management plan for the identifica-
tion, research, protection, and public interpretation
of—
(A) the archaeological protection sites lo-
cated on Federal land; and
(B) for sites on State or private lands for
which the Secretary has entered into coopera-
tive agreements pursuant to section 6 of this
Act.
(2) CONSULTATION.—The general management
plan shall be developed by the Secretary in consulta-
tion with the Governor of New Mexico, the New
Mexico State Land Commissioner, affected Native
American pueblos, and other interested parties.
SEC. 6. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.
The Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative
agreements with owners of non-Federal lands with regard
to an archaeological protection site, or portion thereof, lo-
cated on their property. The purpose of such an agreement
shall be to enable the Secretary to assist with the protec-
tion, preservation, maintenance, and administration of the
archaeological resources and associated lands. Where ap-
propriate, a cooperative agreement may also provide for
public interpretation of the site.
associated therewith, in the agreements entered into
under this section;
‘‘(2) the implementation of compacts and fund-
ing agreements entered into under this title; and
‘‘(3) the achievement of tribal health goals and
objectives.
‘‘(b) REGULATION WAIVER.—
‘‘(1) An Indian tribe may submit a written re-
quest to waive application of a regulation promul-
gated under this Act for a compact or funding
agreement entered into with the Indian Health Serv-
ice under this title, to the Secretary identifying the
applicable Federal regulation under this Act sought
to be waived and the basis for the request.
‘‘(2) Not later than 90 days after receipt by the
Secretary of a written request by an Indian tribe to
waive application of a regulation under this Act for
a compact or funding agreement entered into under
this title, the Secretary shall either approve or deny
the requested waiver in writing. A denial may be
made only upon a specific finding by the Secretary
that identified language in the regulation may not be
waived because such waiver is prohibited by Federal
law. A failure to approve or deny a waiver request
not later than 90 days after receipt shall be deemed
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that—
(1) the tribal right of self-government flows
from the inherent sovereignty of Indian tribes and
nations;
(2) the United States recognizes a special gov-
ernment-to-government relationship with Indian
tribes, including the right of the Indian tribes to
self-governance, as reflected in the Constitution,
treaties, Federal statutes, and the course of dealings
of the United States with Indian tribes;
(3) although progress has been made, the Fed-
eral bureaucracy, with its centralized rules and regu-
lations, has eroded tribal self-governance and domi-
nates tribal affairs;
(4) the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration
Project, established under title III of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
(25 U.S.C. 450f note) was designed to improve and
perpetuate the government-to-government relation-
ship between Indian tribes and the United States
and to strengthen tribal control over Federal fund-
ing and program management;
(5) although the Federal Government has made
considerable strides in improving Indian health care,
it has failed to fully meet its trust responsibilities
and to satisfy its obligations to the Indian tribes
under treaties and other laws; and
(6) Congress has reviewed the results of the
Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project and
finds that transferring full control and funding to
tribal governments, upon tribal request, over deci-
sion making for Federal programs, services, func-
tions, and activities (or portions thereof)—
(A) is an appropriate and effective means
of implementing the Federal policy of govern-
ment-to-government 
relations 
with 
Indian
tribes; and
(B) strengthens the Federal policy of In-
dian self-determination.
SEC. 3. DECLARATION OF POLICY.
It is the policy of Congress to—
(1) permanently establish and implement tribal
self-governance within the Department of Health
and Human Services;
(2) call for full cooperation from the Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services and its con-
stituent agencies in the implementation of tribal self-
governance—
(A) to enable the United States to main-
tain and improve its unique and continuing re-
lationship with, and responsibility to, Indian
tribes;
(B) to permit each Indian tribe to choose
the extent of its participation in self-governance
in accordance with the provisions of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance
Act relating to the provision of Federal services
to Indian tribes;
(C) to ensure the continuation of the trust
responsibility of the United States to Indian
tribes and Indian individuals;
(D) to affirm and enable the United States
to fulfill its obligations to the Indian tribes
under treaties and other laws;
(E) to strengthen the government-to-gov-
ernment relationship between the United States
and Indian tribes through direct and meaning-
ful consultation with all tribes;
(F) to permit an orderly transition from
Federal domination of programs and services to
provide Indian tribes with meaningful authority,
control, funding, and discretion to plan, con-
duct, redesign, and administer programs, serv-
ices, functions, and activities (or portions there-
HR 1167 PCS
‘‘(2) the term ‘construction project agreement’
means a negotiated agreement between the Secretary
and an Indian tribe which at a minimum—
‘‘(A) establishes project phase start and
completion dates;
‘‘(B) defines a specific scope of work and
standards by which it will be accomplished;
‘‘(C) identifies the responsibilities of the
Indian tribe and the Secretary;
‘‘(D) addresses environmental consider-
ations;
‘‘(E) identifies the owner and operations/
maintenance entity of the proposed work;
‘‘(F) provides a budget;
‘‘(G) provides a payment process; and
‘‘(H) establishes the duration of the agree-
ment based on the time necessary to complete
the specified scope of work, which may be 1 or
more years;
‘‘(3) the term ‘inherent Federal functions’
means those Federal functions which cannot legally
be delegated to Indian tribes;
‘‘(4) the term ‘inter-tribal consortium’ means a
coalition of two or more separate Indian tribes that
join together for the purpose of participating in self-