datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3410 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to secure critical infrastructure 
against electromagnetic pulses, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 30, 2013 
Mr. FRANKS of Arizona (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
A BILL 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to secure 
critical infrastructure against electromagnetic pulses, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Infrastructure 
Protection Act’’ or ‘‘CIPA’’. 
SEC. 2. EMP PLANNING, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 
AND PROTECTION AND PREPAREDNESS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Homeland Security Act of 
2002 (6 U.S.C. 121) is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:48 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3410.IH
H3410
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPANSION OF NATIONAL WILD-
LIFE REFUGES. 
Section 4(a) of the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(6) The Secretary may not expand any national 
wildlife refuge except as expressly authorized by a law en-
acted after January 3, 2013.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:48 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3409.IH
H3409
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2027
To establish an Office for Rare Disease Research in the National Institutes
of Health, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 13, 1995
Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas (for herself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr.
GILMAN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. FAWELL, Mrs. ROUKEMA,
Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. FROST, Mr. WAXMAN,
Mr. OLVER, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. JACKSON-LEE, Mr. HILLIARD, Ms. NOR-
TON, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Commerce
A BILL
To establish an Office for Rare Disease Research in the
National Institutes of Health, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office for Rare Disease
Research Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE FOR RARE DISEASE
RESEARCH.
Part A of title IV of the Public Health Service Act
(42 U.S.C. 281 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end
thereof the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 404F. OFFICE FOR RARE DISEASE RESEARCH.
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established within
the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of
Health an office to be known as the Office for Rare Dis-
ease Research (in this section referred to as the ‘Office’).
The Office shall be headed by a director, who shall be ap-
pointed by the Director of the National Institutes of
Health.
‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Office is to pro-
mote and coordinate the conduct of research on rare dis-
eases through a strategic research plan and to establish
and manage a rare disease research clinical database.
‘‘(c) ADVISORY COUNCIL.—The Secretary shall es-
tablish an advisory council for the purpose of providing
advice to the director of the Office concerning carrying
out the strategic research plan and other duties under this
section. Section 222 shall apply to such council to the
same extent and in the same manner as such section ap-
plies to committees or councils established under such sec-
tion.
‘‘(d) DUTIES.—In carrying out subsection (b), the di-
rector of the Office shall—
‘‘(1) develop a comprehensive plan for the con-
duct and support of research on rare diseases;
‘‘(2) coordinate and disseminate information
among the institutes and the public on rare diseases;
‘‘(3) support research training and encourage
the participation of a diversity of individuals in the
conduct of rare disease research;
‘‘(4) identify projects or research on rare dis-
eases that should be conducted or supported by the
National Institutes of Health;
‘‘(5) develop and maintain a central database
on current government sponsored clinical research
projects for rare diseases;
‘‘(6) determine the need for registries of re-
search subjects and epidemiological studies of rare
disease populations; and
‘‘(7) prepare biennial reports on the activities
carried out or to be carried out by the Office and
submit such reports to the Secretary and the Con-
gress.’’.
Æ
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 340 
To amend the Higher Education Opportunity Act to restrict institutions 
of higher education from using revenues derived from Federal educational 
assistance funds for advertising, marketing, or recruiting purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 22, 2013 
Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Higher Education Opportunity Act to restrict 
institutions of higher education from using revenues de-
rived from Federal educational assistance funds for ad-
vertising, marketing, or recruiting purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Financial 
Aid for Students and Taxpayers Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:35 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H340.IH
H340
pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
(1) From 1998 to 2008, enrollment in for-profit 
institutions of higher education increased by 225 
percent, from 553,000 students to 1,800,000 stu-
dents. 
(2) On average, 86 percent of revenues at 15 
large, publicly traded companies that operate for- 
profit institutions of higher education came from the 
Federal Government through student aid programs. 
(3) In 2009, students who enrolled at for-profit 
institutions 
of 
higher 
education 
received 
$30,000,000,000 in Federal Pell Grants and student 
loans. 
(4) Eight out of the 10 top recipients of Post- 
9/11 Educational Assistance funds are for-profit in-
stitutions of higher education. For-profit colleges re-
ceived 37 percent ($4,400,000,000) of all Post-9/11 
Educational Assistance funds during the 2-year pe-
riod of August 1, 2009 through July 30, 2011. 
(5) Six of the top 10 military tuition assistance 
recipients are for-profit institutions of higher edu-
cation. For-profit colleges received half of all tuition 
assistance 
dollars—$280,000,000 
out 
of 
$563,000,000 spent last year. 
(6) The 15 companies that received 86 percent 
of their revenues from Federal student aid programs 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:35 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H340.IH
H340
pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
ment agencies (Forest Service, United States Fish and
Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land
Management, Bureau of Reclamation and Corps of Engi-
neers) which—
(1) recognizes the importance of a public-pri-
vate partnership in providing a quality visitor experi-
ence on Federal lands; and
(2) utilizes the competitive process to ensure
reasonable prices and quality services for the public,
a fair return for the Federal Government, and a rea-
sonable opportunity for the economic viability of the
concessioner.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
For the purposes of this Act:
(1) The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ means—
(A) the Secretary of the Interior with re-
spect to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land
Management, and Bureau of Reclamation;
(B) the Secretary of Agriculture with re-
spect to the Forest Service; and
(C) the Secretary of the Army with respect
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
(2) The term ‘‘concession’’ means a commercial
business which provides visitor services, facilities, or
activities on Federal lands or waters pursuant to a
concession services agreement or concession license.
(3) The term ‘‘concession service agreement’’
means a formal written agreement between the
agency head and the concessioner which sets forth
the terms and conditions under which the conces-
sioner is to provide visitor services, facilities or ac-
tivities as well as the rights and obligations of the
Federal Government.
(4) The term ‘‘concession license’’ means a
written agreement between the agency head and the
concessioner to provide recreation services or activi-
ties on a limited basis.
(5) The term ‘‘Board’’ means the Board of
Concession Appeals established by section 12.
(6) The term ‘‘substantial capital investment’’
means a required investment either for new fixed fa-
cilities or acquisition of existing capital improve-
ments greater than 10 percent of the estimated
gross receipts over the life of a concession service
agreement.
(7) The term ‘‘renewal incentive’’ means a cred-
it based on past performance toward the score
awarded by the Secretary to a concessioner’s pro-
HR 2029 EAS
by the conservator or receiver as conservator or receiver for
the Corporation shall be valid against the conservator or
receiver unless the agreement—
‘‘(1) is in writing;
‘‘(2) is executed by the Corporation and any per-
son claiming an adverse interest under the agreement,
including the obligor, contemporaneously with the ac-
quisition of the asset by the Corporation;
‘‘(3) is approved by the Board or an appropriate
committee of the Board, which approval shall be re-
flected in the minutes of the Board or committee; and
‘‘(4) has been, continuously, from the time of the
agreement’s execution, an official record of the Cor-
poration.
‘‘(h) REPORT TO THE CONGRESS.—On a determina-
tion by the receiver for the Corporation that there are insuf-
ficient assets of the receivership to pay all valid claims
against the receivership, the receiver shall submit to the Sec-
retary of the Treasury, the Committee on Agriculture of the
House of Representatives, and the Committee on Agri-
culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report on
the financial condition of the receivership.
‘‘(i) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITIES.—
‘‘(1) CORPORATION.—The charter of the Corpora-
tion shall be canceled, and the authority provided to
of such representative institutions carrying out 
distance education programs; and 
(B) nonprofit organizations representing 
institutions of higher education; and 
(5) any other entity or individual the Secretary 
of Education determines appropriate. 
(c) ACTIVITIES.— 
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—Not later than 6 
months after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Education shall submit to Congress and 
make available on a publicly available website a re-
port (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Higher Edu-
cation Regulatory Reform Report’’) prepared by the 
Higher Education Regulatory Reform Task Force on 
Federal regulatory requirements for institutions of 
higher education. In prioritizing the review and con-
sideration of such regulatory requirements for the 
purposes of the Higher Education Regulatory Re-
form Report, the Higher Education Regulatory Re-
form Task Force shall give highest priority to regu-
lations that are in effect at the time of such review 
and consideration and related to— 
(A) State authorization of distance edu-
cation; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:18 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3412.IH
H3412
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 3410 RFS 
SEC. 4. NO NEW AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
This Act, including the amendments made by this 
Act, may be carried out only by using funds appropriated 
under the authority of other laws. 
Passed the House of Representatives December 1, 
2014. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:59 Dec 02, 2014
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3410.RFS
H3410
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3413 
To require a study and report by the Comptroller General regarding the 
restart provision of the Hours of Service Rules for Commercial Truck 
Drivers, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 30, 2013 
Mr. HANNA (for himself, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, and Mr. MICHAUD) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To require a study and report by the Comptroller General 
regarding the restart provision of the Hours of Service 
Rules for Commercial Truck Drivers, and for other pur-
poses. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘True Understanding 
of the Economy and Safety Act’’ or the ‘‘TRUE Safety 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds that— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:18 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3413.IH
H3413
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) the trucking industry is the backbone of the 
Nation’s economy, with nearly 7 million Americans 
working in trucking-related jobs, including more 
than 3 million commercial truck drivers; 
(2) 80 percent of all communities in the United 
States depend solely on trucks to deliver and supply 
their essential everyday commodities; 
(3) Federal regulations governing the hours of 
service for commercial truck drivers must be based 
on full and fair scientific research, analysis, and 
operational testing; 
(4) the restart rule that became effective on 
July 1, 2013, was based mainly on a one-month 
sleep study conducted in a laboratory setting; 
(5) the new restart rule will cost the trucking 
industry up to $376,000,000 annually, reducing pro-
ductivity, impacting driver pay, and increasing the 
cost to deliver goods; and 
(6) the restart rule should not have become ef-
fective prior to completion of the thorough oper-
ational study required by section 32301 of the Mov-
ing Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act or 
MAP–21 (Public Law 112–141; 126 Stat. 786). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
06:49 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3413.IH
H3413
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the House of Representatives, U.S.,
January 3, 1996.
Resolved, That the House agree to the amendments of
the Senate to the bill (H.R. 2029) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend
the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to provide regulatory relief, and
for other purposes’’, with the following
HOUSE AMENDMENT TO
SENATE AMENDMENT:
In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Sen-
ate amendment to the text of the bill, insert:
104TH CONGRESS
2ND SESSION
H. R. 2029
HOUSE AMENDMENT
TO SENATE
AMENDMENT
‘‘(A) with respect to fiscal year 1996,
$1,561,000,000,000 in outlays;
‘‘(B) with respect to fiscal year 1997,
$1,592,000,000,000 in outlays;
‘‘(C) with respect to fiscal year 1998,
$1,624,000,000,000 in outlays;
‘‘(D) with respect to fiscal year 1999,
$1,657,000,000,000 in outlays;
‘‘(E) with respect to fiscal year 2000,
$1,706,000,000,000 in outlays;
‘‘(F) with respect to fiscal year 2001,
$1,757,000,000,000 in outlays; and
‘‘(G) with respect to fiscal year 2002,
$1,810,000,000,000 in outlays.’’.
SEC. 232. ENFORCING MAXIMUM SPENDING SEQUESTRA-
TION.
(a) SEQUESTRATION.—Section 253(a) of the Bal-
anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(a) SEQUESTRATION.—Within 15 days after Con-
gress adjourns to end a session (other than the One Hun-
dred Third Congress), and on the same day as sequestra-
tion (if any) under sections 251 and 252, but after any
sequestration required by those sections, there shall be a
sequestration (if necessary) to reduce total Federal spend-
HR 2029 EAS
the Corporation by this title shall terminate, on such
date as the Farm Credit Administration Board deter-
mines is appropriate following the placement of the
Corporation in receivership, but not later than the
conclusion of the receivership and discharge of the re-
ceiver.
‘‘(2) OVERSIGHT.—The Office of Secondary Mar-
ket Oversight established under section 8.11 shall be
abolished, and section 8.11(a) and subtitle B shall
have no force or effect, on such date as the Farm
Credit Administration Board determines is appro-
priate following the placement of the Corporation in
receivership, but not later than the conclusion of the
receivership and discharge of the receiver.’’.
TITLE II—REGULATORY RELIEF
SEC. 201. COMPENSATION OF ASSOCIATION PERSONNEL.
Section 1.5(13) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12
U.S.C. 2013(13)) is amended by striking ‘‘, and the ap-
pointment and compensation of the chief executive officer
thereof,’’.
SEC. 202. USE OF PRIVATE MORTGAGE INSURANCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1.10(a)(1) of the Farm
Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2018(a)(1)) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
Partnership using grants provided under 
this section are carried out in consultation 
with the Governor of the State of Oregon 
and the heads of appropriate Indian tribes, 
the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
the National Marine Fisheries Service, and 
the Forest Service.’’. 
(3) In subsection (c)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘In carrying out’’ and 
inserting the following: 
‘‘(A) LARGE PROJECTS.—In carrying out’’; 
and 
(ii) by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(B) SMALL
PROJECTS.—In providing 
grants to carry out ecosystem restoration 
projects under this section, the Secretary shall 
provide funding and technical assistance to each 
lead entity for activities necessary to protect, 
monitor, and restore fish and wildlife habitat.’’; 
(B) in paragraph (2)— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:18 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3414.IH
H3414
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(i) in the matter preceding subpara-
graph (A), by inserting ‘‘, or provide 
grants for,’’ after ‘‘carry out’’; 
(ii) in subparagraph (A)— 
(I) by inserting ‘‘fish and wildlife 
habitat,’’ before ‘‘navigation’’; and 
(II) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and insert-
ing a semicolon; 
(iii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 
and 
(iv) by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(C) drinking water.’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(3) EASEMENTS.—A project carried out, or for 
which a grant is provided, under this section may be 
carried out on private property through the use of 
an easement.’’. 
(4) By amending subsection (d) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(d) PRIORITY.—In determining the priority of 
projects to be carried out under this section— 
‘‘(1) for projects carried out by the Secretary, 
the Secretary shall consult with the applicable lead 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:18 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3414.IH
H3414
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(B) PROCEDURES.—For a motion to 
waive a point of order under subparagraph (A) 
as to a matter— 
‘‘(i) a motion to table the point of 
order shall not be in order; 
‘‘(ii) all motions to waive one or more 
points of order under this section as to the 
matter shall be debatable for a total of not 
more than 1 hour, equally divided between 
the Senator raising the point of order and 
the Senator moving to waive the point of 
order or their designees; and 
‘‘(iii) a motion to waive the point of 
order shall not be amendable. 
‘‘(d) DISPOSITION
OF POINT
OF ORDER
IN
THE 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a Member of the House 
of Representatives makes a point of order under this 
section, the Chair shall put the question of consider-
ation with respect to the proposition of whether any 
statement made under subsection (a) was adequate 
or, in the absence of such a statement, whether a 
statement is required under subsection (a). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:19 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3417.IH
H3417
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 2029 EAS
(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting
the following:
‘‘(A) LEAST-COST RESOLUTION.—Assistance
may not be provided to an insured System bank
under this subsection unless the means of provid-
ing the assistance is the least costly means of
providing the assistance by the Farm Credit In-
surance Fund of all possible alternatives avail-
able to the Corporation, including liquidation of
the bank (including paying the insured obliga-
tions issued on behalf of the bank). Before mak-
ing a least-cost determination under this sub-
paragraph, the Corporation shall accord such
other insured System banks as the Corporation
determines to be appropriate the opportunity to
submit information relating to the determina-
tion.
‘‘(B) DETERMINING
LEAST
COSTLY
AP-
PROACH.—In determining the least costly alter-
native under subparagraph (A), the Corporation
shall—
‘‘(i) evaluate alternatives on a present-
value basis, using a realistic discount rate;
‘‘(ii) document the evaluation and the
assumptions on which the evaluation is
onstration program in serving eligible 
veterans. 
‘‘(vii) 
CONSULTATION.—The 
Sec-
retary, in coordination with the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs, shall consult with re-
cipients of grants under section 101 of the 
Native American Housing Assistance and 
Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 
4111) and any other appropriate tribal or-
ganization on the design of the demonstra-
tion program to ensure the effective deliv-
ery of rental assistance and supportive 
services to persons eligible to receive as-
sistance under this subparagraph. 
‘‘(viii) WAIVER.— 
‘‘(I) IN
GENERAL.—Except as 
provided in subclause (II), the Sec-
retary may waive or specify alter-
native requirements for any provision 
of law (including regulations) that the 
Secretary administers in connection 
with the use of rental assistance made 
available under this subparagraph if 
the Secretary finds that the waiver or 
alternative requirement is necessary 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3418.IH
H3418
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
for the effective delivery and adminis-
tration of rental assistance made 
available under this subparagraph to 
Indian veterans. 
‘‘(II) 
EXCEPTION.—The 
Sec-
retary shall not waive or specify alter-
native requirements under subclause 
(I) for any provision of law (including 
regulations) relating to labor stand-
ards or the environment.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:33 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3418.IH
H3418
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3419 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small busi-
nesses from the employer health insurance mandate and to modify the 
definition of full-time employee for purposes of such mandate. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 30, 2013 
Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 
certain small businesses from the employer health insur-
ance mandate and to modify the definition of full-time 
employee for purposes of such mandate. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Fair-
ness in Obamacare Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:34 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3419.IH
H3419
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS