datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
ignees of the electric consumers) in 
the United States— 
(aa) in an electronic ma-
chine readable form, without ad-
ditional charge, in conformity 
with standards developed through 
a 
voluntary, 
consensus-based, 
multistakeholder process; 
(bb) in as close to real-time 
as is reasonably practicable; 
(cc) at the level of specificity 
that the data is transmitted by 
the meter or as is reasonably 
practicable; and 
(dd) in a manner that pro-
vides adequate protections for the 
security of the information and 
the privacy of the electric con-
sumer; 
(II) electric utilities should, when 
a smart meter is servicing a con-
sumer, communicate energy usage in-
formation to a device or network of an 
electric consumer or a device or net-
work of a third party authorized by 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:42 May 05, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1980.IH
H1980
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
the consumer, and where feasible 
should provide to the consumer or 
third-party designee, at a minimum, 
access to usage information (not in-
cluding price information) of the con-
sumer directly from the smart meter 
in as close to real-time as is reason-
ably practicable; 
(III) retail electric energy infor-
mation should be provided by the elec-
tric utility of the consumer or such 
other entity as may be designated by 
the applicable electric retail regulatory 
authority; 
(IV) retail electric energy infor-
mation of the consumer should be 
made 
available 
to 
the 
consumer 
through a website or other electronic 
access authorized by the electric con-
sumer, for a period of at least 13 
months after the date on which the 
usage occurred; 
(V) consumer access to data, in-
cluding data provided to owners and 
managers of commercial and multi-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:42 May 05, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1980.IH
H1980
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
family buildings with multiple tenants, 
should not interfere with or com-
promise the integrity, security, or pri-
vacy of the operations of a utility and 
the electric consumer; 
(VI) electric energy information 
relating to usage information gen-
erated by devices in or on the prop-
erty of the consumer that is trans-
mitted to the electric utility should be 
made available to the electric con-
sumer or the third-party agent des-
ignated by the electric consumer; and 
(VII) the same privacy and secu-
rity requirements applicable to the 
contracting utility should apply to 
third-party agents contracting with a 
utility to process the customer data of 
that utility. 
(E) REVISIONS.—The Secretary shall peri-
odically review and, as necessary, revise the vol-
untary guidelines to reflect changes in tech-
nology, privacy needs, and the market for elec-
tric energy and services. 
(d) VERIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:42 May 05, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1980.IH
H1980
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may submit to the 
Secretary a description of the data sharing policies 
of the State relating to consumer access to electric 
energy information for certification by the Secretary 
that the policies meet the voluntary guidelines issued 
under subsection (c)(2). 
(2) ASSISTANCE.—Subject to the availability of 
funds under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall make 
Federal amounts available to any State that has 
data sharing policies described in paragraph (1) that 
the Secretary certifies meets the voluntary guidelines 
issued under subsection (c)(2) to assist the State in 
implementing 
programs 
described 
in 
section 
362(d)(17) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 
Act. 
(3) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this subsection $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2016, to 
remain available until expended. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:42 May 05, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1980.IH
H1980
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1981 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an employ-
ee’s ‘regular rate’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation 
will not be affected by certain additional payments. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 23, 2015 
Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 
that an employee’s ‘regular rate’ for purposes of calcu-
lating overtime compensation will not be affected by cer-
tain additional payments. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Bonus Pro-
tection Act’’. 
SEC. 2. REGULAR RATE FOR OVERTIME PURPOSES. 
Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 
is amended— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:20 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1981.IH
H1981
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) by inserting before the semicolon at the end 
of paragraph (3) the following: ‘‘; or (d) the pay-
ments are made to reward an employee or group of 
employees for meeting or exceeding the productivity, 
quality, efficiency, or sales goals as specified in a 
gainsharing plan, incentive bonus plan, commission 
plan, or performance contingent bonus plan’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘A plan described in clause (d) of paragraph (3) shall 
be in writing and made available to employees, provided 
that the amount of the payments to be made under the 
plan be based upon a formula that is stated in the plan, 
and be established and maintained in good faith for the 
purpose of distributing to employees additional remunera-
tion over and above the wages and salaries that are not 
dependent upon the existence of such plan or payments 
made pursuant to such plan.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:46 May 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1981.IH
H1981
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
following the calendar year in which this Act 
was enacted. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:18 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1984.IH
H1984
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
quirements of section 604 if the court determines, on the
basis of the rulemaking record, that the final regulatory
flexibility analysis was prepared by the agency without ob-
servance of procedure required by section 604 of this title.
‘‘(6) If, by the end of the 90-day period beginning
on the date of the order of the court pursuant to para-
graph (5) (or such longer period as the court may pro-
vide), the agency fails, as appropriate—
‘‘(A) to prepare the analysis required by section
604 of this title; or
‘‘(B) to take corrective action consistent with
the requirements of section 604 of this title,
the court may stay the rule or grant such other relief as
it deems appropriate.
‘‘(7) In making any determination or granting any
relief authorized by this subsection, the court shall take
due account of the rule of prejudicial error.
‘‘(b) In an action for the judicial review of a rule,
any regulatory flexibility analysis for such rule (including
an analysis prepared or corrected pursuant to subsection
(a)(5)) shall constitute part of the whole record of agency
action in connection with such review.
‘‘(c) Nothing in this section bars judicial review of
any other impact statement or similar analysis required
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1985 
To prohibit treatment of gray wolves in Washington, Oregon, and Utah 
as endangered species, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 23, 2015 
Mr. NEWHOUSE (for himself, Mr. WALDEN, and Mr. STEWART) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To prohibit treatment of gray wolves in Washington, Oregon, 
and Utah as endangered species, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Northwest 
Gray Wolf Management Act of 2015’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TREATMENT OF WOLVES IN 
WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND UTAH UNDER 
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Any wolf in a covered State shall 
not be treated under any status of the Endangered Species 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:19 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1985.IH
H1985
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including as an 
endangered species, a threatened species, an essential ex-
perimental population, or a nonessential experimental pop-
ulation. 
(b) EXCLUSIVE COVERED STATE MANAGEMENT AU-
THORITY.— 
(1) EXCLUSIVE STATE MANAGEMENT AUTHOR-
ITY.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), each 
covered State shall have exclusive authority to man-
age wolves within the borders of that covered State. 
(2) PROTECTION BY COVERED STATES.—A cov-
ered State may not provide protections to wolves 
that is greater than the protections that would be 
provided under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) if subsection (a) and para-
graph (1) of this subsection did not apply. 
(3) REIMBURSEMENT BY COVERED STATES.— 
Nothing in this Act precludes any State from reim-
bursing the owner of livestock for any loss of live-
stock that results from depredation by wolves, or 
that derives from wolves, that were introduced into 
the wild. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:19 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1985.IH
H1985
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) STATE.—The term ‘‘covered State’’ means 
each of the States of Washington, Oregon, and 
Utah. 
(2) WOLF.—The term ‘‘wolf’’ means any spe-
cies, subspecies, or population segment of Canis 
lupus. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:19 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1985.IH
H1985
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1986 
To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent rule for new 
residential wood heaters. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 23, 2015 
Mr. ROUZER (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 
RIBBLE, Mr. JONES, Mr. WALKER, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. GRAVES of Mis-
souri, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, and Mr. 
MEADOWS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent 
rule for new residential wood heaters. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop EPA Overregula-
tion of Rural Americans’’. 
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD 
HEATERS. 
The final rule entitled ‘‘Standards of Performance for 
New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:47 May 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1986.IH
H1986
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces’’ published at 80 Fed. 
Reg. 13672 (March 16, 2015) shall have no force or effect 
and shall be treated as if such rule had never been issued. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:47 May 07, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1986.IH
H1986
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
be likely to affect the integrity of the services 
that the Commission may expect from the State 
member, alternate, officer, or employee. 
(3) VIOLATION.—Any person that violates this 
subsection shall be fined not more than $10,000, im-
prisoned not more than 2 years, or both. 
(j) 
VALIDITY
OF
CONTRACTS, 
LOANS, 
AND 
GRANTS.—The Commission may declare void any con-
tract, loan, or grant of or by the Commission in relation 
to which the Commission determines that there has been 
a violation of any provision under subsection (h)(4), sub-
section (i), or sections 202 through 209 of title 18, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 
4. 
ECONOMIC 
AND 
COMMUNITY 
DEVELOPMENT 
GRANTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commission may approve 
grants to States, local development districts (as defined 
in section 6(a)), and public and nonprofit entities for 
projects, approved in accordance with section 9— 
(1) to develop the infrastructure of the region 
for the purpose of facilitating economic development 
in the region (except that grants for this purpose 
may only be made to a State or local government);
HR 1987 RFS 
‘‘(A) $6,981,036,000 for fiscal year 2016; 
and 
‘‘(B) $6,981,036,000 for fiscal year 2017. 
‘‘(2) For the acquisition, construction, renova-
tion, and improvement of aids to navigation, shore 
facilities, vessels, and aircraft, including equipment 
related thereto, and for maintenance, rehabilitation, 
lease, and operation of facilities and equipment— 
‘‘(A) $1,546,448,000 for fiscal year 2016; 
and 
‘‘(B) $1,546,448,000 for fiscal year 2017. 
‘‘(3) For the Coast Guard Reserve program, in-
cluding operations and maintenance of the program, 
personnel and training costs, equipment, and serv-
ices— 
‘‘(A) $140,016,000 for fiscal year 2016; 
and 
‘‘(B) $140,016,000 for fiscal year 2017. 
‘‘(4) For the environmental compliance and res-
toration functions of the Coast Guard under chapter 
19 of this title— 
‘‘(A) $16,701,000 for fiscal year 2016; and 
‘‘(B) $16,701,000 for fiscal year 2017. 
‘‘(5) To the Commandant of the Coast Guard 
for research, development, test, and evaluation of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:19 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1987.RFS
H1987
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1987 RFS 
(3) each plan required under section 2902 of 
title 14, United States Code, as redesignated by sub-
section (d) of this section; and 
(4) each mission need statement required under 
section 569 of title 14, United States Code. 
SEC. 102. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 
(a) ANALYSIS FOR TITLE 14.—The analysis for title 
14, United States Code, is amended by adding after the 
item relating to part II the following: 
‘‘III. Coast Guard Authorizations and Reports to Con-
gress ............................................................................ 2701’’. 
(b) ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER 15.—The analysis for 
chapter 15 of title 14, United States Code, is amended 
by striking the item relating to section 569a. 
(c) ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER 17.—The analysis for 
chapter 17 of title 14, United States Code, is amended 
by striking the items relating to sections 661, 662, 662a, 
and 663. 
(d) ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER 27.—The analysis for 
chapter 27 of title 14, United States Code, as added by 
section 101(a) of this Act, is amended by inserting— 
(1) before the item relating to section 2702 the 
following: 
‘‘2701. Requirement for prior authorization of appropriations.’’; 
and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:19 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1987.RFS
H1987
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 927 PCS
(1) IN GENERAL.—This section applies to aliens
seeking to enter the United States on or after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) TRAFFICKING.—This section applies only
with respect to acts within the meaning of ‘‘traffics’’
that occur on or after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives September 21,
1995.
Attest:
ROBIN H. CARLE,
Clerk.
By LINDA NAVE,
Deputy Clerk.
HR 927 PCS——2
HR 927 PCS——3
HR 927 PCS——4
HR 927 PCS——5
HR 927 PCS——6
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 928
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the nonrecogni-
tion of gain on long-term real property which is involuntarily converted
as the result of the exercise of eminent domain, without regard to
whether the replacement property is similar or of like kind.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
Mr. COSTELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
for the nonrecognition of gain on long-term real property
which is involuntarily converted as the result of the exer-
cise of eminent domain, without regard to whether the
replacement property is similar or of like kind.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN
REAL 
PROPERTY 
INVOLUNTARILY 
CON-
VERTED AS RESULT OF EXERCISE OF EMI-
NENT DOMAIN.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1033 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 (relating to involuntary conversions)
is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection
(j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the following new
subsection:
‘‘(i) CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY HELD FOR
AT LEAST 10 YEARS.—For purposes of subsection (a), if
real property held by the taxpayer for at least 10 years
is (as the result of its seizure, requisition, or condemna-
tion, or threat or imminence thereof) compulsorily or in-
voluntarily converted, any other property shall (at the elec-
tion of the taxpayer) be treated as property similar or re-
lated in service or use to the property so converted.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to dispositions of converted prop-
erty occurring on or after October 1, 1991.
(c) If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax re-
sulting from the application of subsection (a) is prevented
at any time before the close of the 1-year period beginning
on the date of the enactment of this Act by the operation
of any law or rule of law (including res judicata), refund
or credit of such overpayment (to the extent attributable
to the application of subsection (a)) may, nevertheless, be
made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the close
of such 1-year period.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 92
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain corporations
and certain trusts to be shareholders of subchapter S corporations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 4, 1995
Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow cer-
tain corporations and certain trusts to be shareholders
of subchapter S corporations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORATIONS ALLOWED TO BE SHAREHOLD-
ERS OF SUBCHAPTER S CORPORATIONS IN
CERTAIN CASES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 1361 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining S corpora-
tion) is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow-
ing new paragraph:
‘‘(7) CORPORATIONS
PERMITTED
AS
SHARE-
HOLDERS IN CERTAIN CASES.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (b)(1)(B)
and (b)(2)(A) shall not apply to a shareholder
which is a corporation if each shareholder of
such corporation is of a type permitted (without
regard to this paragraph) to be a shareholder of
an S corporation.
‘‘(B) 
CORPORATION’S
SHAREHOLDERS
COUNTED.—The shareholders of each corporate
shareholder of a corporation (and not such cor-
porate shareholder) shall be counted in deter-
mining whether such corporation meets the re-
quirement of subsection (b)(1)(A).’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TRUSTS ALLOWED TO BE SHAREHOLD-
ERS OF SUBCHAPTER S CORPORATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 1361 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special
rule for qualified subchapter S trust) is amended by redes-
ignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) and by inserting
after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph:
‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL TRUSTS INCLUDED AS SUB-
CHAPTER
S
TRUSTS.—For purposes of this sub-
section, the term ‘qualified subchapter S trust’ also
means a trust—
‘‘(A) all of the income beneficiaries of
which are individuals who are citizens or resi-
dents of the United States,
‘‘(B) all of the income (within the meaning
of section 643(b)) of which is distributed (or re-
quired to be distributed) not less frequently
than annually to 1 or more of such individuals,
and
‘‘(C) an election is in effect under para-
graph (2) for each of such individuals with re-
spect to each corporation the stock of which is
held by the trust.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 931
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives
to encourage the preservation of low-income housing.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
Mr. JEFFERSON (for himself, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. LIVINGSTON,
Mr. HAYES, Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. FIELDS of
Louisiana, Mr. TAUZIN, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FORD, Mr.
LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. FROST, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. SCOTT,
Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. DIXON, Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr. THOMPSON,
Mr. CLAY, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. TUCKER,
Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. LEVIN,
Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. BAKER of Louisiana)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
tax incentives to encourage the preservation of low-in-
come housing.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Low-Income Housing
Preservation Act of 1995’’.
State funds for this purpose. The Administrator, in mak-
ing such grants, shall seek to treat all States equitably.
SEC. 8. BUILDING HEALTH ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Director of the National Insti-
tute for Occupational Safety and Health shall implement
a Building Assessment Program to provide assistance and
guidance to employers and employees on measures to re-
duce significant indoor air health risks.
(b) SELECTION OF BUILDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT.—
An assessment may be initiated in response to a request
from any employer or employee (including an authorized
representative of the employee) submitted to the Director
for a building assessment. In making such voluntary as-
sessment, the Director shall have the authority, pursuant
to such request, to conduct on-site assessments of individ-
ual buildings, including Federal, State, and municipal
buildings. In selecting a building for assessment pursuant
to such request, the Director shall consider (1) the seri-
ousness and extent of significant indoor air health risks,
and (2) the potential for the building assessment to ex-
pand knowledge of building assessment methods and re-
sponse measures.
(c) ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS.—Assessments shall in-
clude, at a minimum, identification of (1) probable signifi-
cant indoor air health risks, (2) probable sources and
(2) to assist the region in obtaining job train-
ing, employment-related education, and business de-
velopment; 
(3) to assist the region in community and eco-
nomic development; 
(4) to provide assistance to severely distressed 
and underdeveloped areas; and 
(5) to otherwise achieve the purposes of this 
Act. 
(b) FUNDING.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Funds for grants under sub-
section (a) may be provided— 
(A) entirely from appropriations to carry 
out this section; 
(B) in combination with funds available 
under another State or Federal grant program; 
or 
(C) from any other source. 
(2) ELIGIBLE
PROJECTS.—The Commission 
may provide assistance, make grants, enter into con-
tracts, and otherwise provide funds to eligible enti-
ties in the region for projects that promote— 
(A) business development; 
(B) job training or employment-related 
education;