†
978
HR 1585 PP
TITLE XVIII—NATIONAL GUARD
BUREAU MATTERS AND RE-
LATED MATTERS
SEC. 1801. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Em-
powerment Act of 2007’’.
SEC. 1802. EXPANDED AUTHORITY OF CHIEF OF THE NA-
TIONAL GUARD BUREAU AND EXPANDED
FUNCTIONS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BU-
REAU.
(a) EXPANDED AUTHORITY.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section
10501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking ‘‘joint bureau of the Department of the Army
and the Department of the Air Force’’ and inserting
‘‘joint activity of the Department of Defense’’.
(2) PURPOSE.—Subsection (b) of such section is
amended by striking ‘‘between’’ and all that follows
and inserting ‘‘between—
‘‘(1)(A) the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs
of Staff, and the commanders of the combatant com-
mands of the United States, and (B) the Department
of the Army and the Department of the Air Force;
and
‘‘(2) the several States.’’.
†
979
HR 1585 PP
(b) ENHANCEMENTS OF POSITION OF CHIEF OF NA-
TIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—
(1) ADVISORY FUNCTION ON NATIONAL GUARD
MATTERS.—Subsection (c) of section 10502 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘to the
Secretary of Defense, to the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff,’’ after ‘‘principal adviser’’.
(2) GRADE.—Subsection (d) of such section is
amended by striking ‘‘lieutenant general’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘general’’.
(3) ANNUAL
REPORT
TO
CONGRESS
ON
VALI-
DATED REQUIREMENTS.—Section 10504 of such title
is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
‘‘(c) ANNUAL
REPORT
ON
VALIDATED
REQUIRE-
MENTS.—Not later than December 31 each year, the Chief
of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to Congress a
report on the following:
‘‘(1) The requirements validated under section
10503a(b)(1) of this title during the preceding fiscal
year.
‘‘(2) The requirements referred to in paragraph
(1) for which funding is to be requested in the next
budget for a fiscal year under section 10544 of this
title.
†
980
HR 1585 PP
‘‘(3) The requirements referred to in paragraph
(1) for which funding will not be requested in the next
budget for a fiscal year under section 10544 of this
title.’’.
(c) ENHANCEMENT
OF
FUNCTIONS
OF
NATIONAL
GUARD BUREAU.—
(1) ADDITIONAL GENERAL FUNCTIONS.—Section
10503 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by redesignating paragraph (12) as
paragraph (13); and
(B) by inserting after paragraph (11) the
following new paragraph (12):
‘‘(12) Facilitating and coordinating with other
Federal agencies, and with the several States, the use
of National Guard personnel and resources for and in
contingency operations, military operations other
than war, natural disasters, support of civil authori-
ties, and other circumstances.’’.
(2) MILITARY ASSISTANCE FOR CIVIL AUTHORI-
TIES.—Chapter 1011 of such title is further amended
by inserting after section 10503 the following new sec-
tion:
†
981
HR 1585 PP
‘‘§ 10503a. Functions of National Guard Bureau: mili-
tary assistance to civil authorities
‘‘(a) IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL NECESSARY AS-
SISTANCE.—The Chief of the National Guard Bureau
shall—
‘‘(1) identify gaps between Federal and State ca-
pabilities to prepare for and respond to emergencies;
and
‘‘(2) make recommendations to the Secretary of
Defense on programs and activities of the National
Guard for military assistance to civil authorities to
address such gaps.
‘‘(b) SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES.—In meeting the
requirements of subsection (a), the Chief of the National
Guard Bureau shall, in coordination with the adjutants
general of the States, have responsibilities as follows:
‘‘(1) To validate the requirements of the several
States and Territories with respect to military assist-
ance to civil authorities.
‘‘(2) To develop doctrine and training require-
ments relating to the provision of military assistance
to civil authorities.
‘‘(3) To acquire equipment, materiel, and other
supplies and services for the provision of military as-
sistance to civil authorities.
†
982
HR 1585 PP
‘‘(4) To assist the Secretary of Defense in pre-
paring the budget required under section 10544 of
this title.
‘‘(5) To administer amounts provided the Na-
tional Guard for the provision of military assistance
to civil authorities.
‘‘(6) To carry out any other responsibility relat-
ing to the provision of military assistance to civil au-
thorities as the Secretary of Defense shall specify.
‘‘(c) CONSULTATION.—The Chief of the National
Guard Bureau shall carry out activities under this section
in consultation with the Secretary of the Army and the Sec-
retary of the Air Force.’’.
(3) BUDGETING FOR TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT
FOR
MILITARY
ASSISTANCE
TO
CIVIL
AUTHORITIES
AND OTHER DOMESTIC MISSIONS.—Chapter 1013 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following new section:
‘‘§ 10544. National Guard training and equipment:
budget for military assistance to civil au-
thorities and for other domestic oper-
ations
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The budget justification docu-
ments materials submitted to Congress in support of the
budget of the President for a fiscal year (as submitted with
†
983
HR 1585 PP
the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title
31) shall specify separate amounts for training and equip-
ment for the National Guard for purposes of military assist-
ance to civil authorities and for other domestic operations
during such fiscal year.
‘‘(b) SCOPE
OF FUNDING.—The amounts specified
under subsection (a) for a fiscal year shall be sufficient for
purposes as follows:
‘‘(1) The development and implementation of
doctrine and training requirements applicable to the
assistance and operations described in subsection (a)
for such fiscal year.
‘‘(2) The acquisition of equipment, materiel, and
other supplies and services necessary for the provision
of such assistance and such operations in such fiscal
year.’’.
(4) LIMITATION ON INCREASE IN PERSONNEL OF
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—The Secretary of Defense
shall, to the extent practicable, ensure that no addi-
tional personnel are assigned to the National Guard
Bureau in order to address administrative or other
requirements arising out of the amendments made by
this subsection.
(d) CONFORMING AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—
†
984
HR 1585 PP
(1) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of
section 10503 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘§ 10503. Functions of National Guard Bureau: char-
ter’’.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(A) The table of
sections at the beginning of chapter 1011 of such title
is amended by striking the item relating to section
10503 and inserting the following new items:
‘‘10503. Functions of National Guard Bureau: charter.
‘‘10503a. Functions of National Guard Bureau: military assistance to civil au-
thorities.’’.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1013 of such title is amended by adding at
the end the following new item:
‘‘10544. National Guard training and equipment: budget for military assistance
to civil authorities and for other domestic operations.’’.
SEC. 1803. PROMOTION OF ELIGIBLE RESERVE OFFICERS
TO LIEUTENANT GENERAL AND VICE ADMI-
RAL GRADES ON THE ACTIVE-DUTY LIST.
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress
that, whenever officers are considered for promotion to the
grade of lieutenant general, or vice admiral in the case of
the Navy, on the active duty list, officers of the reserve com-
ponents of the Armed Forces who are eligible for promotion
to such grade should be considered for promotion to such
grade.
†
985
HR 1585 PP
(b) PROPOSAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress a proposal for mechanisms to achieve the objec-
tive specified in subsection (a). The proposal shall include
such recommendations for legislative or administrative ac-
tion as the Secretary considers appropriate in order to
achieve that objective.
(c) 
NOTICE
ACCOMPANYING
NOMINATIONS.—The
President shall include with each nomination of an officer
to the grade of lieutenant general, or vice admiral in the
case of the Navy, on the active-duty list that is submitted
to the Senate for consideration a certification that all re-
serve officers who were eligible for consideration for pro-
motion to such grade were considered in the making of such
nomination.
SEC. 1804. PROMOTION OF RESERVE OFFICERS TO LIEU-
TENANT GENERAL GRADE.
(a) TREATMENT OF SERVICE AS ADJUTANT GENERAL
AS JOINT DUTY EXPERIENCE.—
(1) DIRECTORS
OF
ARMY
AND
AIR
NATIONAL
GUARD.—Section 10506(a)(3) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended—
(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (C),
(D), and (E) as subparagraphs (D), (E), and
(F), respectively; and
†
986
HR 1585 PP
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the
following new subparagraph (C):
‘‘(C) Service of an officer as adjutant general shall be
treated as joint duty experience for purposes of subpara-
graph (B)(ii).’’.
(2) OTHER OFFICERS.—The service of an officer
of the Armed Forces as adjutant general, or as an of-
ficer (other than adjutant general) of the National
Guard of a State who performs the duties of adjutant
general under the laws of such State, shall be treated
as joint duty or joint duty experience for purposes of
any provisions of law required such duty or experi-
ence as a condition of promotion.
(b) REPORTS ON PROMOTION OF RESERVE MAJOR
GENERALS TO LIEUTENANT GENERAL GRADE.—
(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the
Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each
conduct a review of the promotion practices of the
military department concerned in order to identify
and assess the practices of such military department
in the promotion of reserve officers from major gen-
eral grade to lieutenant general grade.
(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 60 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the
Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each
†
987
HR 1585 PP
submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on the review conducted by such official under
paragraph (1). Each report shall set forth—
(A) the results of such review; and
(B) a description of the actions intended to
be taken by such official to encourage and facili-
tate the promotion of additional reserve officers
from major general grade to lieutenant general
grade.
SEC. 1805. REQUIREMENT THAT POSITION OF DEPUTY COM-
MANDER OF THE UNITED STATES NORTHERN
COMMAND BE FILLED BY A QUALIFIED NA-
TIONAL GUARD OFFICER.
(a) IN GENERAL.—A position of Deputy Commander
of the United States Northern Command shall be filled by
a qualified officer of the National Guard who is eligible for
promotion to the grade of lieutenant general.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the requirement in sub-
section (a) is to ensure that information received from the
National Guard Bureau regarding the operation of the Na-
tional Guard of the several States is integrated into the
plans and operations of the United States Northern Com-
mand.
†
988
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 1806. REQUIREMENT FOR SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO
PREPARE ANNUAL PLAN FOR RESPONSE TO
NATURAL 
DISASTERS 
AND 
TERRORIST
EVENTS.
(a) REQUIREMENT
FOR ANNUAL PLAN.—Not later
than March 1, 2008, and each March 1 thereafter, the Sec-
retary of Defense, in consultation with the commander of
the United States Northern Command and the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau, shall prepare and submit to Con-
gress a plan for coordinating the use of the National Guard
and members of the Armed Forces on active duty when re-
sponding to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other
man-made disasters as identified in the national planning
scenarios described in subsection (e).
(b) INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO SECRETARY.—
To assist the Secretary of Defense in preparing the plan,
the National Guard Bureau, pursuant to its purpose as
channel of communications as set forth in section 10501(b)
of title 10, United States Code, shall provide to the Sec-
retary information gathered from Governors, adjutants gen-
eral of States, and other State civil authorities responsible
for homeland preparation and response to natural and
man-made disasters.
(c) TWO VERSIONS.—The plan shall set forth two
versions of response, one using only members of the Na-
tional Guard, and one using both members of the National
†
989
HR 1585 PP
Guard and members of the regular components of the Armed
Forces.
(d) MATTERS COVERED.—The plan shall cover, at a
minimum, the following:
(1) Protocols for the Department of Defense, the
National Guard Bureau, and the Governors of the
several States to carry out operations in coordination
with each other and to ensure that Governors and
local communities are properly informed and remain
in control in their respective States and communities.
(2) An identification of operational procedures,
command structures, and lines of communication to
ensure a coordinated, efficient response to contin-
gencies.
(3) An identification of the training and equip-
ment needed for both National Guard personnel and
members of the Armed Forces on active duty to pro-
vide military assistance to civil authorities and for
other domestic operations to respond to hazards iden-
tified in the national planning scenarios.
(e) NATIONAL PLANNING SCENARIOS.—The plan shall
provide for response to the following hazards:
(1) Nuclear detonation, biological attack, biologi-
cal disease outbreak/pandemic flu, the plague, chem-
ical attack-blister agent, chemical attack-toxic indus-
†
990
HR 1585 PP
trial chemicals, chemical attack-nerve agent, chemical
attack-chlorine tank explosion, major hurricane,
major earthquake, radiological attack-radiological dis-
persal device, explosives attack-bombing using impro-
vised explosive device, biological attack-food contami-
nation, biological attack-foreign animal disease and
cyber attack.
(2) Any other hazards identified in a national
planning scenario developed by the Homeland Secu-
rity Council.
SEC. 1807. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RE-
LATING TO NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT.
Section 10541 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
‘‘(d) Each report under this section concerning equip-
ment of the National Guard shall also include the following:
‘‘(1) A statement of the accuracy of the projec-
tions required by subsection (b)(5)(D) contained in
earlier reports under this section, and an explanation,
if the projection was not met, of why the projection
was not met.
‘‘(2) A certification from the Chief of the Na-
tional Guard Bureau setting forth an inventory for
the preceding fiscal year of each item of equipment—
‘‘(A) for which funds were appropriated;
†
991
HR 1585 PP
‘‘(B) which was due to be procured for the
National Guard during that fiscal year; and
‘‘(C) which has not been received by a Na-
tional Guard unit as of the close of that fiscal
year.’’.
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008’’.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or Location
Amount
Alabama ............
Anniston Army Depot ..............................................
$26,000,000
Redstone Arsenal ......................................................
$20,000,000
Alaska ...............
Fort Richardson .......................................................
$92,800,000
Fort Wainwright ......................................................
$114,500,000
Arizona .............
Fort Huachuca .........................................................
$129,600,000
California .........
Fort Irwin .................................................................
$24,000,000
Presidio, Monterey ....................................................
$28,000,000
Colorado ............
Fort Carson ...............................................................
$156,200,000
Delaware ...........
Dover Air Force Base ...............................................
$17,500,000
Florida ..............
Eglin Air Force Base ...............................................
$66,000,000
†
992
HR 1585 PP
Army: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or Location
Amount
Miami Doral .............................................................
$237,000,000
Georgia ..............
Fort Benning ............................................................
$185,800,000
Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field ....................
$123,500,000
Hawaii ..............
Fort Shafter ..............................................................
$31,000,000
Schofield Barracks ....................................................
$88,000,000
Wheeler Army Air Field ..........................................
$51,000,000
Illinois ...............
Rock Island Arsenal .................................................
$3,350,000
Kansas ..............
Fort Leavenworth .....................................................
$90,800,000
Fort Riley .................................................................
$138,300,000
Kentucky ...........
Fort Campbell ...........................................................
$105,000,000
Fort Knox ..................................................................
$6,700,000
Louisiana ..........
Fort Polk ...................................................................
$15,900,000
Maryland ..........
Aberdeen Proving Ground .......................................
$12,200,000
Michigan ...........
Detroit Arsenal .........................................................
$18,500,000
Missouri ............
Fort Leonard Wood ..................................................
$125,650,000
Nevada ..............
Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant ....................
$11,800,000
New Mexico .......
White Sands Missile Range .....................................
$71,000,000
New York ..........
Fort Drum ................................................................
$291,000,000
North Carolina
Fort Bragg ................................................................
$275,600,000
Oklahoma ..........
Fort Sill ....................................................................
$6,200,000
South Carolina
Fort Jackson .............................................................
$85,000,000
Texas .................
Camp Bullis ..............................................................
$1,600,000
Fort Bliss ..................................................................
$111,900,000
Fort Hood .................................................................
$145,400,000
Fort Sam Houston ...................................................
$19,150,000
Red River Army Depot ............................................
$9,200,000
Virginia ............
Fort Belvoir ..............................................................
$13,000,000
Fort Eustis ................................................................
$75,000,000
Fort Lee .....................................................................
$16,700,000
Fort Myer ..................................................................
$20,800,000
Washington .......
Fort Lewis .................................................................
$164,600,000
Yakima Training Center .........................................
$29,000,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations or locations outside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or Location
Amount
Bulgaria ...............................
Nevo Selo FOS ...........................................
$61,000,000
Germany ..............................
Grafenwoehr ...............................................
$62,000,000
Honduras .............................
Soto Cano Air Base ...................................
$2,550,000
Italy .....................................
Vicenza .......................................................
$173,000,000
Korea ....................................
Camp Humphreys .....................................
$57,000,000
Romania ..............................
Mihail Kogalniceanu FOS ........................
$12,600,000
†
993
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in
the amounts set forth in the following table:
Army: Family Housing
Country
Installation or Location
Units
Amount
Germany ....................
Ansbach .............................................
138 ......
$52,000,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry
out architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $2,000,000.
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Army may improve existing military family
housing units in an amount not to exceed $365,400,000.
†
994
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2007, for military construction,
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of
the Department of the Army in the total amount of
$5,218,067,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(a),
$3,254,250,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(b),
$295,150,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United
States Code, $23,000,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $333,947,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $419,400,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including the functions described in section
†
995
HR 1585 PP
2833 
of 
title 
10, 
United 
States 
Code),
$742,920,000.
(6) For the construction of increment 3 of a bar-
racks complex at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, author-
ized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of
Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3485), $47,400,000.
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of a bar-
racks complex at Fort Lewis, Washington, authorized
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of
Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2445), as amended by
section 20814 of the Continuing Appropriations Reso-
lution, 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–289), as
added by section 2 of the Revised Continuing Appro-
priations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110–5),
$102,000,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act
may not exceed the sum of the following:
†
996
HR 1585 PP
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(a).
(2) $204,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat 2445), as amended by
section 20814 of the Continuing Appropriations Reso-
lution, 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–289) (as
added by section 2 of the Revised Continuing Appro-
priations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110–5)), for
construction of a brigade complex for Fort Lewis,
Washington).
(3) $37,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(b) for construction of a
brigade complex operations support facility at
Vicenza, Italy).
(4) $36,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(b) for construction of a
brigade complex barracks and community support fa-
cility at Vicenza, Italy).
†
997
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2105. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
FISCAL YEAR 2007 ARMY PROJECTS FOR
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED.
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2445), as amended
by section 20814 of the Continuing Appropriations Resolu-
tion, 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–289), as added
by section 2 of the Revised Continuing Appropriations Res-
olution, 2007 (Public Law 110–5), is further amended—
(1) by striking the item relating to Redstone Ar-
senal, Alabama;
(2) by striking the item relating to Fort Wain-
wright, Alaska;
(3) in the item relating to Fort Irwin, Cali-
fornia, by striking ‘‘$18,200,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’;
(4) in the item relating to Fort Carson, Colo-
rado, by striking ‘‘$30,800,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$24,000,000’’;
(5) in the item relating to Fort Leavenworth,
Kansas, by striking ‘‘$23,200,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000’’;
†
998
HR 1585 PP
(6) in the item relating to Fort Riley, Kansas,
by striking ‘‘$47,400,000’’ in the amount column and
inserting ‘‘$37,200,000’’;
(7) in the item relating to Fort Campbell, Ken-
tucky, by striking ‘‘$135,300,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$115,400,000’’;
(8) by striking the item relating to Fort Polk,
Louisiana;
(9) by striking the item relating to Aberdeen
Proving Ground, Maryland;
(10) by striking the item relating to Fort
Detrick, Maryland;
(11) by striking the item relating to Detroit Ar-
senal, Michigan;
(12) in the item relating to Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri, by striking ‘‘$34,500,000’’ in the amount
column and inserting ‘‘$17,000,000’’;
(13) by striking the item relating to Picatinny
Arsenal, New Jersey;
(14) in the item relating to Fort Drum, New
York, by striking ‘‘$218,600,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$209,200,000’’;
(15) in the item relating to Fort Bragg, North
Carolina, by striking ‘‘$96,900,000’’ in the amount
column and inserting ‘‘$89,000,000’’;
†
999
HR 1585 PP
(16) by striking the item relating to Letterkenny
Depot, Pennsylvania;
(17) by striking the item relating to Corpus
Christi Army Depot, Texas;
(18) by striking the item relating to Fort Bliss,
Texas;
(19) in the item relating to Fort Hood, Texas, by
striking ‘‘$93,000,000’’ in the amount column and in-
serting ‘‘$75,000,000’’;
(20) by striking the item relating to Red River
Depot, Texas; and
(21) by striking the item relating to Fort Lee,
Virginia.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2104(a) of
such Act (120 Stat. 2447) is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking 
‘‘$3,518,450,000’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘$3,275,700,000’’; and
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking
‘‘$1,362,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,119,450,000’’.
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2006 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2101(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3485)
†
1000
HR 1585 PP
is amended in the item relating to Fort Bragg, North Caro-
lina, by striking ‘‘$301,250,000’’ in the amount column and
inserting ‘‘$308,250,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2104(b)(5)
of that Act (119 Stat. 3488) is amended by striking
‘‘$77,400,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$84,400,000’’.
SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECT.
(a) EXTENSION AND RENEWAL.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 2701 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375;
118 Stat. 2116), the authorization set forth in the table in
subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act, shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2008, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2009, whichever is later.
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is
as follows:
Army: Extension of 2005 Project Authorization
Installation or Location
Project
Amount
Schofield Barracks, Hawaii ................
Training facility ......................
$35,542,000
SEC. 2108. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR
2007.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO SPECIFY LOCATION
OF PROJECT IN ROMANIA.—The table in section 2101(b) of
†
1001
HR 1585 PP
the Military Construction Authorization Act for 2007 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2446) is amended
by striking ‘‘Babadag Range’’ and inserting ‘‘Mihail
Kogalniceanu Air Base’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO CORRECT PRINTING
ERROR RELATING TO ARMY FAMILY HOUSING.—The table
in section 2102(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120
Stat. 2446) is amended by striking ‘‘Fort McCoyine’’ and
inserting ‘‘Fort McCoy’’.
SEC. 2109. GROUND LEASE, SOUTHCOM HEADQUARTERS FA-
CILITY, MIAMI-DORAL, FLORIDA.
(a) GROUND LEASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of
the Army may utilize the State of Florida property as de-
scribed in sublease number 4489–01, entered into between
the State of Florida and the United States (in this section
referred to as the ‘‘ground lease’’), for the purpose of con-
structing a consolidated headquarters facility for the United
States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
(b) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary of the Army may carry out the project to construct
a new headquarters on property leased from the State of
Florida when the following conditions have been met re-
garding the lease for the property:
†
1002
HR 1585 PP
(1) The United States Government shall have the
right to use the property without interruption until
at least December 31, 2055.
(2) The United States Government shall have the
right to use the property for general administrative
purposes in the event the United States Southern
Command relocates or vacates the property.
(c) AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN GROUND LEASE OF ADJA-
CENT PROPERTY.—The Secretary may obtain the ground
lease of additional real property owned by the State of Flor-
ida that is adjacent to the real property leased under the
ground lease for purposes of completing the construction of
the SOUTHCOM headquarters facility, as long as the addi-
tional terms of the ground lease required by subsection (b)
apply to such adjacent property.
(d) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not obligate or
expend funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2104(a)(1) for the construction
of the SOUTHCOM headquarters facility authorized under
section 2101(a) until the Secretary transmits to the congres-
sional defense committees a modification to the ground lease
signed by the United States Government and the State of
Florida in accordance with subsection (b).
†
1003
HR 1585 PP
TITLE XXII—NAVY
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or Location
Amount
Alabama ............
Outlying Field Evergreen ........................................
$9,560,000
Arizona .............
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma ...........................
$33,720,000
California .........
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton .....................
$366,394,000
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar .....................
$26,760,000
Naval Station, San Diego .......................................
$23,630,000
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms .................
$147,059,000
Connecticut .......
Naval Submarine Base, New London .....................
$11,900,000
Florida ..............
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Blount Island .........
$7,570,000
Cape Canaveral ........................................................
$9,900,000
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Panama City .......
$13,870,000
Hawaii ..............
Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe .......................
$37,961,000
Naval Base, Pearl Harbor .......................................
$99,860,000
Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor ...............................
$30,200,000
Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Wahiawa .................
$65,410,000
Illinois ...............
Naval Training Center, Great Lakes ......................
$10,221,000
Indiana .............
Naval Support Activity, Crane ...............................
$12,000,000
Maryland ..........
Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River ...........
$38,360,000
Maine ................
Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth ..................................
$9,700,000
Mississippi ........
Naval Air Station, Meridian ..................................
$6,770,000
Nevada ..............
Naval Air Station, Fallon .......................................
$11,460,000
New Jersey ........
Naval Air Station, Lakehurst .................................
$4,100,000
North Carolina
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point ...............
$28,610,000
Marine Corps Air Station, New River ...................
$54,430,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ........................
$278,070,000
Rhode Island ....
Naval Station, Newport ...........................................
$9,990,000
South Carolina
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ......................
$6,800,000
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island ..........
$55,282,000
Texas .................
Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi .........................
$14,290,000
Virginia ............
Naval Support Activity, Chesapeake ......................
$8,450,000
Naval Station, Norfolk .............................................
$79,560,000
Marine Corps Base, Quantico .................................
$50,519,000
Washington .......
Naval Station, Bremerton .......................................
$190,960,000
Naval Station, Everett .............................................
$10,940,000
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ........................
$23,910,000
†
1004
HR 1585 PP
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations or locations outside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or Location
Amount
Bahrain ...............................
Naval Support Activity, Bahrain ............
$35,500,000
Diego Garcia .......................
Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia ....
$7,150,000
Djibouti ................................
Camp Lemonier .........................................
$22,390,000
Guam ...................................
Naval Activities, Guam ............................
$273,518,000
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2204(a)(3), the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
projects for unspecified installations or locations in the
amount set forth in the following table:
Navy: Unspecified Worldwide
Location
Installation or Location
Amount
Worldwide Unspecified
Wharf Utilities Upgrade ...........................
$8,900,000
Host Nation Infrastructure ......................
$2,700,000
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
†
1005
HR 1585 PP
installation, in the number of units, and in the amount
set forth in the following table:
Navy: Family Housing
Location
Installation
Units
Amount
Mariana Islands ........
Naval Activities, Guam ....................
73 ........
$47,167,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2204(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may carry
out architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of military family housing units in an amount
not to exceed $3,172,000.
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(6)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may improve existing military family
housing units in an amount not to exceed $237,990,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2007, for military construction,
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of
the Department of the Navy in the total amount of
$3,032,790,000, as follows:
†
1006
HR 1585 PP
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(a),
$1,717,016,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(b),
$338,558,000.
(3) For military construction projects at unspec-
ified worldwide locations authorized by section
2201(c), $11,600,000.
(4) For unspecified minor military construction
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United
States Code, $10,000,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $119,658,000.
(6) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $300,095,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833 of
title 10, United States Code), $371,404,000.
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of the
construction of an addition to the National Maritime
Intelligence Center, Suitland, Maryland, authorized
†
1007
HR 1585 PP
by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of
Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2448), $52,069,000.
(8) For the construction of increment 3 of recruit
training barracks infrastructure upgrade at Recruit
Training Command, Great Lakes, Illinois, authorized
by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of
Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3490), $16,650,000.
(9) For the construction of increment 3 of wharf
upgrades at Yokosuka, Japan, authorized by section
2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act of Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Public Law
109–163; 119 Stat. 3490), $8,750,000.
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of the
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Homeport Ashore Pro-
gram at Bremerton, Washington, authorized by sec-
tion 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act of Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Public
Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3490), $47,240,000.
(11) For the construction of increment 4 of the
limited area production and storage complex at Naval
Submarine Base Kitsap, Silverdale, Washington, au-
thorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (division
†
1008
HR 1585 PP
B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105), as
amended by section 2206 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of
Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3493), $39,750,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act
may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of sub-
section (a).
(2) $71,200,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a nuclear aircraft
carrier maintenance pier at Naval Station Brem-
erton, Washington).
SEC. 2205. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
FISCAL YEAR 2007 NAVY PROJECTS FOR
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED.
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2449) is
amended—
†
1009
HR 1585 PP
(1) in the item relating to Marine Corps Base,
Twentynine 
Palms, 
California, 
by 
striking
‘‘$27,217,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$8,217,000’’;
(2) by striking the item relating to Naval Sup-
port Activity, Monterey, California;
(3) by striking the item relating to Naval Sub-
marine Base, New London, Connecticut;
(4) by striking the item relating to Cape Canav-
eral, Florida;
(5) in the item relating to Marine Corps Logis-
tics Base, Albany, Georgia, by striking ‘‘$70,540,000’’
in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$62,000,000’’;
(6) by striking the item relating to Naval Maga-
zine, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;
(7) by striking the item relating to Naval Ship-
yard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;
(8) by striking the item relating to Naval Sup-
port Activity, Crane, Indiana;
(9) by striking the item relating to Portsmouth
Naval Shipyard, Maine;
(10) by striking the item relating to Naval Air
Station, Meridian, Mississippi;
(11) by striking the item relating to Naval Air
Station, Fallon, Nevada;
†
1010
HR 1585 PP
(12) by striking the item relating to Marine
Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina;
(13) by striking the item relating to Naval Sta-
tion, Newport, Rhode Island;
(14) in the item relating to Marine Corps Air
Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, by striking
‘‘$25,575,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$22,225,000’’;
(15) by striking the item relating to Naval Spe-
cial Weapons Center, Dahlgren, Virginia;
(16) in the item relating to Naval Support Ac-
tivity, Norfolk, Virginia, by striking ‘‘$41,712,000’’ in
the amount column and inserting ‘‘$28,462,000’’;
(17) in the item relating to Naval Air Station,
Whidbey 
Island, 
Washington, 
by 
striking
‘‘$67,303,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$57,653,000’’; and
(18) in the item relating to Naval Base, Kitsap,
Washington, by striking ‘‘$17,617,000’’ in the amount
column and inserting ‘‘$13,507,000’’.
(b) TERMINATION
OF MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS.—Section 2204(a)(6)(A) of such Act (120 Stat.
2450) is amended by striking ‘‘$308,956,000’’ and inserting
‘‘$305,256,000’’.
†
1011
HR 1585 PP
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2204(a) of
such Act, as amended by subsection (b), is further
amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking 
‘‘$2,109,367,000’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘$1,946,867,000’’; and
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking
‘‘$832,982,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$674,182,000’’.
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2201(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2105),
as amended by section 2206 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3493) and section 2205 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2452)
is amended—
(1) in the item relating to Strategic Weapons
Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington, by striking
‘‘$147,760,000’’ in the amount column and inserting
‘‘$295,000,000’’; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total
in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$972,719,000’’.
†
1012
HR 1585 PP
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2204 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2107),
as amended by section 2206 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3493) and section 2205 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2453)
is amended in subsection (b)(6), by striking ‘‘$95,320,000’’
and inserting ‘‘$259,320,000’’.
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or Location
Amount
Alaska .........................
Elmendorf Air Force Base .............................
$83,180,000
Arizona .......................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .....................
$11,200,000
Arkansas .....................
Little Rock Air Force Base ............................
$9,800,000
California ...................
Travis Air Force Base ....................................
$26,600,000
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson .....................................................
$13,500,000
Schriever Air Force Base ...............................
$24,500,000
United States Air Force Academy .................
$15,000,000
District of Columbia
Bolling Air Force Base ...................................
$2,500,000
Florida .......................
Eglin Air Force Base ......................................
$158,300,000
MacDill Air Force Base .................................
$57,000,000
Patrick Air Force Base ...................................
$11,854,000
Tyndall Air Force Base ..................................
$44,114,000
Georgia .......................
Robins Air Force Base ...................................
$14,700,000
†
1013
HR 1585 PP
Air Force: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or Location
Amount
Hawaii .......................
Hickam Air Force Base ..................................
$31,971,000
Illinois ........................
Scott Air Force Base ......................................
$24,900,000
Kansas ........................
Fort Riley ........................................................
$12,515,000
Massachusetts .............
Hanscom Air Force Base ...............................
$12,800,000
Montana .....................
Malmstrom Air Force Base ............................
$7,000,000
Nebraska .....................
Offutt Air Force Base .....................................
$16,952,000
New Mexico ................
Cannon Air Force Base ..................................
$1,688,000
Kirtland Air Force Base ................................
$11,400,000
Nevada ........................
Nellis Air Force Base ......................................
$4,950,000
North Dakota .............
Grand Forks Air Force Base .........................
$13,000,000
Minot Air Force Base .....................................
$18,200,000
Oklahoma ...................
Altus Air Force Base ......................................
$2,000,000
Tinker Air Force Base ....................................
$34,600,000
Vance Air Force Base .....................................
$7,700,000
South Carolina ..........
Charleston Air Force Base .............................
$11,000,000
South Dakota .............
Ellsworth Air Force Base ...............................
$16,600,000
Texas ...........................
Lackland Air Force Base ...............................
$14,000,000
Utah ............................
Hill Air Force Base ........................................
$25,999,000
Wyoming ....................
Francis E. Warren Air Force Base ...............
$14,600,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Air Force: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or Location
Amount
Germany ..............................
Ramstein Air Base ....................................
$48,209,000
Guam ...................................
Andersen Air Force Base ..........................
$10,000,000
Qatar ....................................
Al Udeid Air Base .....................................
$22,300,000
Spain ...................................
Moron Air Base .........................................
$1,800,000
United Kingdom .................
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ....................
$17,300,000
Royal Air Force Menwith Hill Station ...
$41,000,000
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2304(a)(3), the Secretary of the Air Force may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
†
1014
HR 1585 PP
projects for unspecified installations or locations in the
amounts set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Unspecified Worldwide
Location
Installation or Location
Amount
Worldwide Classified ..........
Classified Project .......................................
$1,500,000
Classified-Special Evaluation Program ..
$13,940,000
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the
Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units
(including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at
the installation or location, in the number of units, and
in the amount set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Family Housing
State or Country
Installation or Location
Units
Amount
Germany .......................
Ramstein Air Base ...........................
117 ....
$56,275,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $12,210,000.
†
1015
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(6)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may improve existing military fam-
ily housing units in an amount not to exceed $294,262,000.
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR
FORCE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2007, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total
amount of $2,097,357,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2301(a),
$754,123,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2301(b),
$140,609,000.
(3) For the military construction projects at un-
specified worldwide locations authorized by section
2301(c), $15,440,000.
(4) For unspecified minor military construction
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United
States Code, $15,000,000.
†
1016
HR 1585 PP
(5) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $61,103,000.
(6) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $362,747,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833 of
title 10, United States Code), $688,335,000.
(7) For the construction of increment 3 of the
main base runway at Edwards Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia, authorized by section 2301(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006
(division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3494),
$35,000,000.
(8) For the construction of increment 3 of the
CENTCOM Joint Intelligence Center at MacDill Air
Force Base, Florida, authorized by section 2301(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163;
119 Stat. 3494), as amended by section 2305 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120
Stat. 2456), $25,000,000.
†
1017
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2305. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
FISCAL YEAR 2007 AIR FORCE PROJECTS FOR
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED.
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2301(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2453) is
amended—
(1) in the item relating to Elmendorf, Alaska, by
striking ‘‘$68,100,000’’ in the amount column and in-
serting ‘‘$56,100,000’’;
(2) in the item relating to Davis-Monthan Air
Force Base, Arizona, by striking ‘‘$11,800,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$4,600,000’’;
(3) by striking the item relating to Little Rock
Air Force Base, Arkansas;
(4) in the item relating to Travis Air Force
Base, California, by striking ‘‘$85,800,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$73,900,000’’;
(5) by striking the item relating to Peterson Air
Force Base, Colorado;
(6) in the item relating to Dover Air Force,
Delaware, by striking ‘‘$30,400,000’’ in the amount
column and inserting ‘‘$26,400,000’’;
†
1018
HR 1585 PP
(7) in the item relating to Eglin Air Force Base,
Florida, by striking ‘‘$30,350,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$19,350,000’’;
(8) in the item relating to Tyndall Air Force
Base, Florida, by striking ‘‘$8,200,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,800,000’’;
(9) in the item relating to Robins Air Force
Base, Georgia, by striking ‘‘$59,600,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$38,600,000’’;
(10) in the item relating to Scott Air Force, Illi-
nois, by striking ‘‘$28,200,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’;
(11) by striking the item relating to McConnell
Air Force Base, Kansas;
(12) by striking the item relating to Hanscom
Air Force Base, Massachusetts;
(13) by striking the item relating to Whiteman
Air Force Base, Missouri;
(14) by striking the item relating to Malmstrom
Air Force Base, Montana;
(15) in the item relating to McGuire Air Force
Base, New Jersey, by striking ‘‘$28,500,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$15,500,000’’;
(16) by striking the item relating to Kirtland
Air Force Base, New Mexico;
†
1019
HR 1585 PP
(17) by striking the item relating to Minot Air
Force Base, North Dakota;
(18) in the item relating to Altus Air Force
Base, Oklahoma, by striking ‘‘$9,500,000’’ in the
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,500,000’’;
(19) by striking the item relating to Tinker Air
Force Base, Oklahoma;
(20) by striking the item relating to Charleston
Air Force Base, South Carolina;
(21) in the item relating to Shaw Air Force
Base, South Carolina, by striking ‘‘$31,500,000’’ in
the amount column and inserting ‘‘$22,200,000’’;
(22) by striking the item relating to Ellsworth
Air Force Base, South Dakota;
(23) by striking the item relating to Laughlin
Air Force Base, Texas;
(24) by striking the item relating to Sheppard
Air Force Base, Texas;
(25) in the item relating to Hill Air Force Base,
Utah, by striking ‘‘$63,400,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$53,400,000’’; and
(26) by striking the item relating to Fairchild
Air Force Base, Washington.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2304(a) of
such Act (120 Stat. 2455) is amended—
†
1020
HR 1585 PP
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking 
‘‘$3,231,442,000’’ 
and 
inserting
‘‘$3,005,817,000’’; and
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking
‘‘$962,286,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$736,661,000’’.
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2006 PROJECT.
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2301(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3494),
as amended by section 2305(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2456), is further amended in
the item relating to MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, by
striking ‘‘$101,500,000’’ in the amount column and insert-
ing ‘‘$126,500,000’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2304(b)(4) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (119 Stat. 3496), as amended by section 2305(b) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007 (120 Stat. 2456), is further amended by striking
‘‘$23,300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$48,300,000’’.
†
1021
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSION AND RENEWAL.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 2701 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375;
118 Stat. 2116), authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2302 of that Act, shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2008, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2009, whichever is later.
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is
as follows:
Air Force: Extension of 2005 Project Authorizations
Installation or Location
Project
Amount
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ari-
zona.
Family housing (250 units) ....
$48,500,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia.
Family housing (120 units) ....
$30,906,000
MacDill Air Force Base, Florida ........
Family housing (61 units) ......
$21,723,000
MacDill Air Force Base, Florida ...
Housing maintenance facility
$1,250,000
Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi
Housing management facility
$711,000
Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri ..
Family housing (160 units) ....
$37,087,000
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base,
North Carolina.
Family housing (167 units) ....
$32,693,000
Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas ......
Family housing (127 units) ....
$20,604,000
Ramstein Air Base, Germany .............
USAFE Theater Aerospace
Operations Support Center.
$24,024,000
SEC. 2308. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECTS.
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2701 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1716),
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
†
1022
HR 1585 PP
provided in section 2302 of that Act and extended by section
2702 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120
Stat. 2464), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2008,
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2009, whichever is
later.
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is
as follows:
Air Force: Extension of 2004 Project Authorizations
Installation or Location
Project
Amount
Travis Air Force Base, California ......
Family housing (56 units) ......
$12,723,000
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida ............
Family housing (279 units) ....
$32,166,000
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE
AGENCIES
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2403(a)(1), the Secretary of Defense may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for the installations or locations inside the United States,
and in the amounts, set forth in the following tables:
Defense Education Activity
State
Installation or Location
Amount
North Carolina
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ............................
$2,014,000