155 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3074. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN. 
The Secretary shall expedite development of the 
dredged material management plan for the project for 
navigation St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
299). 
SEC. 3075. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The text of section 1149 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4254) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘The Secretary shall construct at Federal expense a 
second lock, of the same dimensions as the existing Poe 
Lock, adjacent to the existing lock at Sault Sainte Marie, 
Michigan, generally in accordance with the report of the 
Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, dated May 
19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated Feb-
ruary 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.’’. 
(b) 
CONFORMING
REPEALS.—The 
following 
provisoins are repealed: 
(1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620). 
(2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717–3718). 
(3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305).
156 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3076. ADA, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood damage re-
duction, Wild Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried 
out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in de-
termining the Federal interest in the project. 
(b) EVALUATION
OF BENEFITS
AND COSTS.—In 
evaluating the economic benefits and costs for the project, 
the Secretary shall not consider the emergency levee adja-
cent to Judicial Ditch No. 51 in the determination of con-
ditions existing prior to construction of the project. 
(c) SPECIAL RULE.—In evaluating and implementing 
the project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal in-
terest to participate in the financing of the project in ac-
cordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary’s evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project. 
SEC. 3077. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Du-
luth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
(33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide
157 
HR 2864 PCS 
public access and recreational facilities as generally de-
scribed in the Detailed Project Report and Environmental 
Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, 
Minnesota, dated August 1999. 
(b) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall provide credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
the costs of design work carried out before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project. 
(c) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $5,000,000. 
SEC. 3078. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non- 
Federal share of the cost of the navigation project for 
Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, carried out under sec-
tion 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577) and modified by section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), for the costs 
of design work carried out before the date of the partner-
ship agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the project. 
SEC. 3079. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is directed to im-
plement under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of
158 
HR 2864 PCS 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the locally preferred plan for flood 
damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, substantially 
in accordance with the detailed project report dated 2002, 
at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$4,000,000. 
(b) PROJECT FINANCING.—In evaluating and imple-
menting the project under this section, the Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interests to participate in the fi-
nancing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report 
evaluation indicates that applying such section is nec-
essary to implement the project. 
(c) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the project the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before date of execution of a partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project. 
(d) MAXIMUM FUNDING.—The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the flood damage 
reduction shall be $8,000,000.
159 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3080. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Har-
bors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to develop a final design and prepare 
plans and specifications to correct the harbor entrance and 
mooring conditions at the project. 
SEC. 3081. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA. 
The project for flood control, Red Lake River, 
Crookston, Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
278), is modified to include flood protection for the adja-
cent and interconnected areas generally known as the 
Sampson and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance 
with the Feasibility Report Supplement, Local Flood Pro-
tection, Crookston, Minnesota, at a total cost of 
$17,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$11,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$6,000,000. 
SEC. 3082. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act 
of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to include 
operation and maintenance of the general navigation fa-
cilities as a Federal responsibility.
160 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3083. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Min-
nesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to in-
clude operation and maintenance of the general navigation 
facilities as a Federal responsibility. 
SEC. 3084. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Two 
Harbors, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include construction of a dredged material 
disposal facility, including actions required to clear the 
site. 
(b) LANDS, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.— 
Non-Federal interests shall be responsible for providing all 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary 
for the construction of the dredged material disposal facil-
ity. 
(c) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $5,000,000. 
SEC. 3085. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, 
Harrison County, Mississippi, being carried out under sec-
tion 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to authorize the non-Fed-
161 
HR 2864 PCS 
eral interest to provide any portion of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind serv-
ices and materials. 
SEC. 3086. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall complete a 
feasibility study for the project for flood damage reduc-
tion, Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi. 
(b) COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES.—The feasibility 
study shall identify both the plan that maximizes national 
economic development benefits and the locally preferred 
plan and shall compare the level of flood damage reduction 
provided by each plan to that portion of Jackson, Mis-
sissippi, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam. 
(c) RECOMMENDED PLAN.—If the Secretary deter-
mines that the locally preferred plan provides a level of 
flood damage reduction that is equal to or greater than 
the level of flood damage reduction provided by the na-
tional economic development plan, and the locally pre-
ferred plan is technically feasible and environmentally pro-
tective, the Secretary shall recommend construction of the 
locally preferred plan. 
(d) EVALUATION OF PROJECT COST.—For the pur-
poses of determining compliance with the first section of 
the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a), 
the Secretary shall consider only the costs of the national
162 
HR 2864 PCS 
economic development plan, and shall exclude incremental 
costs associated with the locally preferred plan that are 
in excess of such costs, if the non-Federal interest agrees 
to pay 100 percent of such incremental costs. 
(e) NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.—If the locally pre-
ferred plan is authorized for construction, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project shall be the same percent-
age as the non-Federal share of the cost of the national 
economic development plan plus all additional costs of con-
struction associated with the locally preferred plan. 
SEC. 3087. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI. 
Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3088. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch- 
Chesterfield, Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of the planning, design, and construction work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.
163 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3089. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI. 
The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Mis-
souri, authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and 
section 102(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project. 
SEC. 3090. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope 
Creek, 
Lincoln, 
Nebraska, 
authorized 
by 
section 
101(b)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified— 
(1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of design, and construction work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partner-
ship agreement for the project if the Secretary de-
termines that the work is integral to the project; and 
(2) to allow the non-Federal sponsor for the 
project to use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, 
funds provided under any other Federal program, to 
satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share
164 
HR 2864 PCS 
of the project if such funds are authorized to be 
used to carry out the project. 
SEC. 3091. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration and flood dam-
age reduction, Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, 
authorized by section 101(b)(20) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified— 
(1) to direct the Secretary to provide credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
or reimbursement for the costs of any work that has 
been or will be performed by the non-Federal inter-
est before, on, or after the approval of the project 
partnership agreement, including work performed by 
the non-Federal interest in connection with the de-
sign and construction of 7 upstream detention stor-
age structures, if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the project; 
(2) to require that in-kind work to be credited 
under paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and 
(3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance 
funds from the non-Federal interest as needed to 
maintain the project schedule.
165 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3092. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, 
NEW JERSEY. 
The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem res-
toration, shore protection, and hurricane and storm dam-
age reduction, Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May 
Point, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
278), is modified to incorporate the project for shoreline 
erosion control, Cape May Point, New Jersey, carried out 
under section 5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property’’, approved August 13, 1946 
(33 U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines that such 
incorporation is feasible. 
SEC. 3093. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, 
NEW JERSEY. 
The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jer-
sey and New York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4607) and modified by section 327 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is further 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and 
costs of preserving natural flood storage in any future eco-
nomic analysis of the project.
166 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3094. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK. 
The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New 
York, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is modified to include meas-
ures to enhance public access, at Federal cost of 
$500,000. 
SEC. 3095. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK. 
Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ‘‘max-
imum Federal cost of $5,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘total 
cost of $20,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3096. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW 
YORK AND NEW JERSEY. 
The navigation project, Port of New York and New 
Jersey, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 
101(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified— 
(1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non- 
Federal interest to construct a temporary dredged 
material storage facility to receive dredged material 
from the project if— 
(A) the non-Federal interest submits, in 
writing, a list of potential sites for the tem-
porary storage facility to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives, the Committee on Environ-
167 
HR 2864 PCS 
ment and Public Works of the Senate, and the 
Secretary at least 180 days before the selection 
of the final site; and 
(B) at least 70 percent of the dredged ma-
terial generated in connection with the project 
suitable for beneficial reuse will be used at sites 
in the State of New Jersey to the extent that 
there are sufficient sites available; and 
(2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of construction of the temporary storage facility if 
the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
the project. 
SEC. 3097. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM. 
Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(c) NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM DEFINED.— 
In this section, the term ‘New York State Canal System’ 
means the 524 miles of navigable canal that comprise the 
New York State Canal System, including the Erie, Ca-
yuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the his-
toric alignments of these canals, including the cities of Al-
bany and Buffalo.’’.
168 
HR 2864 PCS 
SEC. 3098. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, OHIO. 
Section 507(1) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3758) is amended by striking 
‘‘$2,500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$6,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3099. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO. 
In carrying out the project for environmental dredg-
ing, authorized by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), 
the Secretary is directed to credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the part-
nership agreement for the project if the Secretary deter-
mines that the work is integral to the project. 
SEC. 3100. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA. 
Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, 
to the Secretary in October 1999 of costs associated with 
present and future water storage at Arcadia Lake, Okla-
homa, under Arcadia Lake Water Storage Contract Num-
ber DACW56–79–C–0072 shall satisfy the obligations of 
the city under that contract for such costs, including ac-
crued interest. 
SEC. 3101. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA. 
The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project 
Master Conservancy District payable to the United States 
Government in the amounts, rates of interest, and pay-
ment schedules is set at the amounts, rates of interest,
169 
HR 2864 PCS 
and payment schedules that existed, and that both parties 
agreed to, on June 3, 1986, and may not be adjusted, 
altered, or changed without a specific, separate, and writ-
ten agreement between the District and the United States 
Government. 
SEC. 3102. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, 
MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, OREGON. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for environmental 
restoration, 
Willamette 
River 
temperature 
control, 
McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, authorized by section 
101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3665) and modified by section 344 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
308), is further modified to direct the Secretary to pay, 
subject to the availability of appropriations, compensation 
for losses to small business attributable to the implemen-
tation of the drawdown conducted as a part of project im-
plementation in 2002. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—Not later than 
120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary shall establish, and provide public notice of, a pro-
gram— 
(1) to receive claims for compensation for losses 
to small business attributable to the implementation