H. R. 1540—235 
‘‘(B) specific actions on the defense business system 
programs submitted for certification under such subsection; 
‘‘(2) identify the number of defense business system pro-
grams so certified; 
‘‘(3) identify any covered defense business system program 
during the preceding fiscal year that was not approved under 
subsection (a), and the reasons for the lack of approval; 
‘‘(4) discuss specific improvements in business operations 
and cost savings resulting from successful defense business 
systems programs; and 
‘‘(5) include a copy of the most recent report of the Chief 
Management 
Officer 
of 
each 
military 
department 
on 
implementation of business transformation initiatives by such 
department in accordance with section 908 of the Duncan 
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 
note). 
‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘defense business system’ means an informa-
tion system, other than a national security system, operated 
by, for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including 
financial systems, mixed systems, financial data feeder systems, 
and information technology and information assurance infra-
structure, used to support business activities, such as acquisi-
tion, financial management, logistics, strategic planning and 
budgeting, installations and environment, and human resource 
management. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘covered defense business system program’ 
means any defense business system program that is expected 
to have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period 
of the current future-years defense program submitted to Con-
gress under section 221 of this title. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘enterprise architecture’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44. 
‘‘(4) The terms ‘information system’ and ‘information tech-
nology’ have the meanings given those terms in section 11101 
of title 40. 
‘‘(5) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.’’. 
SEC. 902. QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE POSITION 
OF DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 
Section 132(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: 
‘‘The Deputy Secretary shall be appointed from among persons 
most highly qualified for the position by reason of background 
and experience, including persons with appropriate management 
experience.’’. 
SEC. 903. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR OFFI-
CIAL WITH PRINCIPAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR AIRSHIP PRO-
GRAMS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) designate a senior official of the Department of Defense 
as the official with principal responsibility for the airship pro-
grams of the Department; and
H. R. 1540—236 
(2) set forth the responsibilities of that senior official with 
respect to such programs. 
SEC. 904. MEMORANDA OF AGREEMENT ON IDENTIFICATION AND 
DEDICATION OF ENABLING CAPABILITIES OF GENERAL 
PURPOSE FORCES TO FULFILL CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS 
OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—By not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, each Secretary 
of a military department shall enter into a memorandum of agree-
ment with the Commander of the United States Special Operations 
Command that identifies or establishes processes and associated 
milestones by which numbers and types of enabling capabilities 
of the general purpose forces of the Armed Forces under the jurisdic-
tion of such Secretary can be identified and dedicated to fulfill 
the training and operational requirements of special operations 
forces under the United States Special Operations Command. 
(b) FORMAT.—Such agreements may be accomplished in an 
annex to existing memoranda of agreement or through separate 
memoranda of agreement. 
SEC. 905. ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACCESS TO NON- 
UNITED STATES CITIZENS WITH SCIENTIFIC AND TECH-
NICAL EXPERTISE VITAL TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY 
INTERESTS. 
(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
conduct an assessment of current and potential mechanisms to 
permit the Department of Defense to employ non-United States 
citizens with critical scientific and technical skills that are vital 
to the national security interests of the United States. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) An identification of the critical scientific and technical 
skills that are vital to the national security interests of the 
United States and are anticipated to be in short supply over 
the next 10 years, and an identification of the military positions 
and civilian positions of the Department of Defense that require 
such skills. 
(2) An identification of mechanisms and incentives for 
attracting persons who are non-United States citizens with 
such skills to such positions, including the expedited extension 
of United States citizenship. 
(3) An identification and assessment of any concerns associ-
ated with the provision of security clearances to such persons. 
(4) An identification and assessment of any concerns associ-
ated with the employment of such persons in civilian positions 
in the United States defense industrial base, including in posi-
tions in which United States citizenship, a security clearance, 
or both are a condition of employment. 
(c) REPORTS.— 
(1) STATUS REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report describing 
the current status of the assessment required by subsection 
(a). 
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
H. R. 1540—237 
the congressional defense committees a report on the assess-
ment. The report shall set forth the following: 
(A) The results of the assessment. 
(B) Such recommendations for legislative or adminis-
trative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in 
light of the results of the assessment. 
SEC. 906. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF MODELING AND SIMULA-
TION IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 
It is the sense of Congress to encourage the Department of 
Defense to continue the use and enhancement of modeling and 
simulation (M&S) across the spectrum of defense activities, 
including acquisition, analysis, experimentation, intelligence, plan-
ning, medical, test and evaluation, and training. 
SEC. 
907. 
SENSE 
OF 
CONGRESS 
ON 
TIES 
BETWEEN 
JOINT 
WARFIGHTING AND COALITION CENTER AND ALLIED COM-
MAND TRANSFORMATION OF NATO. 
It is the sense of Congress that the successor organization 
to the United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM), the Joint 
Warfighting and Coalition Center, should establish close ties with 
the Allied Command Transformation (ACT) command of the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). 
SEC. 908. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF PLANNED REDUCTIONS OF PER-
SONNEL AT THE JOINT WARFARE ANALYSIS CENTER ON 
PERSONNEL SKILLS. 
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report setting forth a description and assess-
ment of the effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint 
Warfare Analysis Center (JWAC) on the personnel skills to be 
available at the Center after the reductions. The report shall be 
in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
SEC. 911. HARMFUL INTERFERENCE TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. 
(a) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CONDITIONS
ON 
COMMERCIAL TERRESTRIAL OPERATIONS.— 
(1) CONTINUATION
OF
CONDITIONS
UNTIL
INTERFERENCE 
ADDRESSED.—The Federal Communications Commission shall 
not lift the conditions imposed on commercial terrestrial oper-
ations in the Order and Authorization adopted on January 
26, 2011 (DA 11–133), or otherwise permit such operations, 
until the Commission has resolved concerns of widespread 
harmful interference by such commercial terrestrial operations 
to covered GPS devices. 
(2) NOTICE AND COMMENT ON WORKING GROUP REPORT.— 
Prior to permitting such commercial terrestrial operations, the 
Federal Communications Commission shall make available the 
final working group report mandated by such Order and 
Authorization and provide all interested parties an opportunity 
to comment on such report. 
(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—
H. R. 1540—238 
(A) IN GENERAL.—At the conclusion of the proceeding 
on such commercial terrestrial operations, the Federal 
Communications Commission shall submit to the congres-
sional committees described in subparagraph (B) official 
copies of the documents containing the final decision of 
the Commission regarding whether to permit such commer-
cial terrestrial operations. If the decision is to permit such 
commercial terrestrial operations, such documents shall 
contain or be accompanied by an explanation of how the 
concerns described in paragraph (1) have been resolved. 
(B) CONGRESSIONAL
COMMITTEES
DESCRIBED.—The 
congressional committees described in this paragraph are 
the following: 
(i) The Committee on Energy and Commerce and 
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives. 
(ii) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation and the Committee on Armed Services 
of the Senate. 
(b) SECRETARY
OF
DEFENSE
REVIEW
OF
HARMFUL
INTER-
FERENCE.— 
(1) REVIEW.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter until 
the date referred to in paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense 
shall conduct a review to— 
(A) assess the ability of covered GPS devices to receive 
signals from Global Positioning System satellites without 
widespread harmful interference; and 
(B) determine if commercial communications services 
are causing or will cause widespread harmful interference 
with covered GPS devices. 
(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 
(A) NOTICE.—If the Secretary of Defense determines 
during a review under paragraph (1) that commercial 
communications services are causing or will cause wide-
spread harmful interference with covered GPS devices, the 
Secretary shall promptly submit to the congressional 
defense committees notice of such interference. 
(B) CONTENTS.—The notice required under subpara-
graph (A) shall include— 
(i) a list and description of the covered GPS devices 
that are being or expected to be interfered with by 
commercial communications services; 
(ii) a description of the source of, and the entity 
causing or expect to cause, the interference with such 
receivers; 
(iii) a description of the manner in which such 
source or such entity is causing or expected to cause 
such interference; 
(iv) a description of the magnitude of harm caused 
or expected to be caused by such interference; 
(v) a description of the duration of and the condi-
tions and circumstances under which such interference 
is occurring or expected to occur; 
(vi) a description of the impact of such interference 
on the national security interests of the United States; 
and
H. R. 1540—239 
(vii) a description of the plans of the Secretary 
to address, alleviate, or mitigate such interference, 
including the cost of such plans. 
(C) FORM.—The notice required under subparagraph 
(A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 
a classified annex. 
(3) TERMINATION DATE.—The date referred to in this para-
graph is the earlier of— 
(A) the date that is two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act; or 
(B) the date on which the Secretary— 
(i) determines that commercial communications 
services are not causing any widespread harmful inter-
ference with covered GPS devices; and 
(ii) the Secretary submits to the congressional 
defense committees notice of the determination made 
under clause (i). 
(c) COVERED GPS DEVICE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘covered GPS device’’ means a Global Position System device of 
the Department of Defense. 
SEC. 912. AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE INCREMENTS OR BLOCKS OF 
SATELLITES AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAMS SUBJECT TO 
ACQUISITION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 
Section 2430a(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘If the Secretary of Defense 
determines’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) If the Secretary of Defense determines that a major defense 
acquisition program to purchase satellites requires the delivery 
of satellites in two or more increments or blocks, the Secretary 
may designate each such increment or block as a major subprogram 
for the purposes of acquisition reporting under this chapter.’’. 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 
SEC. 921. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY 
THE 
COMPTROLLER 
GENERAL 
ON 
INTELLIGENCE 
INFORMATION SHARING. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller Gen-
eral a report on actions taken by the Secretary in response to 
the recommendations of the Comptroller General in the report 
issued on January 22, 2010, titled ‘‘Intelligence, Surveillance, and 
Reconnaissance: Establishing Guidance, Timelines, and Account-
ability for Integrating Intelligence Data Would Improve Information 
Sharing’’ (GAO–10–265NI), regarding the need to develop guidance, 
such as a concept of operations, to provide overarching direction 
and priorities for sharing intelligence information across the defense 
elements of the intelligence community. 
(b) REVIEW OF REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit 
to the appropriate congressional committees a review of the report 
submitted under subsection (a), including a determination by the
H. R. 1540—240 
Comptroller General as to whether the actions taken by the Sec-
retary of Defense in response to the recommendations referred 
to in such subsection are consistent with and adequately address 
such recommendations. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; 
(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
House of Representatives; and 
(3) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 922. INSIDER THREAT DETECTION. 
(a) PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall estab-
lish a program for information sharing protection and insider threat 
mitigation for the information systems of the Department of Defense 
to detect unauthorized access to, use of, or transmission of classified 
or controlled unclassified information. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The program established under subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) Technology solutions for deployment within the Depart-
ment of Defense that allow for centralized monitoring and 
detection of unauthorized activities, including— 
(A) monitoring the use of external ports and read and 
write capability controls; 
(B) disabling the removable media ports of computers 
physically or electronically; 
(C) electronic auditing and reporting of unusual and 
unauthorized user activities; 
(D) using data-loss prevention and data-rights manage-
ment technology to prevent the unauthorized export of 
information from a network or to render such information 
unusable in the event of the unauthorized export of such 
information; 
(E) a roles-based access certification system; 
(F) cross-domain guards for transfers of information 
between different networks; and 
(G) patch management for software and security 
updates. 
(2) Policies and procedures to support such program, 
including special consideration for policies and procedures 
related to international and interagency partners and activities 
in support of ongoing operations in areas of hostilities. 
(3) A governance structure and process that integrates 
information security and sharing technologies with the policies 
and procedures referred to in paragraph (2). Such structure 
and process shall include— 
(A) coordination with the existing security clearance 
and suitability review process; 
(B) coordination of existing anomaly detection tech-
niques, including those used in counterintelligence inves-
tigation or personnel screening activities; and 
(C) updating and expediting of the classification review 
and marking process. 
(4) A continuing analysis of— 
(A) gaps in security measures under the program; and
H. R. 1540—241 
(B) technology, policies, and processes needed to 
increase the capability of the program beyond the initially 
established full operating capability to address such gaps. 
(5) A baseline analysis framework that includes measures 
of performance and effectiveness. 
(6) A plan for how to ensure related security measures 
are put in place for other departments or agencies with access 
to Department of Defense networks. 
(7) A plan for enforcement to ensure that the program 
is being applied and implemented on a uniform and consistent 
basis. 
(c) OPERATING CAPABILITY.—The Secretary shall ensure the 
program established under subsection (a)— 
(1) achieves initial operating capability not later than 
October 1, 2012; and 
(2) achieves full operating capability not later than October 
1, 2013. 
(d) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report that includes— 
(1) the implementation plan for the program established 
under subsection (a); 
(2) the resources required to implement the program; 
(3) specific efforts to ensure that implementation does not 
negatively impact activities in support of ongoing operations 
in areas of hostilities; 
(4) a definition of the capabilities that will be achieved 
at initial operating capability and full operating capability, 
respectively; and 
(5) a description of any other issues related to such 
implementation that the Secretary considers appropriate. 
(e) BRIEFING
REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall provide 
briefings to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate as follows: 
(1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, a briefing describing the governance structure 
referred to in subsection (b)(3). 
(2) Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, a briefing detailing the inventory and status of 
technology solutions deployment referred to in subsection (b)(1), 
including an identification of the total number of host platforms 
planned for such deployment, the current number of host plat-
forms that provide appropriate security, and the funding and 
timeline for remaining deployment. 
(3) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, a briefing detailing the policies and procedures 
referred to in subsection (b)(2), including an assessment of 
the effectiveness of such policies and procedures and an assess-
ment of the potential impact of such policies and procedures 
on information sharing within the Department of Defense and 
with interagency and international partners. 
(f) BUDGET SUBMISSION.—On the date on which the President 
submits to Congress the budget under section 1105 of title 31, 
United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2019, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees an identification of the resources requested in such 
budget to carry out the program established under subsection (a).
H. R. 1540—242 
SEC. 923. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR EXCHANGES OF MAPPING, 
CHARTING, AND GEODETIC DATA TO INCLUDE NON-
GOVERNMENTAL 
ORGANIZATIONS 
AND 
ACADEMIC 
INSTITUTIONS. 
(a) BROADENING OF AUTHORITY.—Section 454 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) FOREIGN COUNTRIES
AND INTER-
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.—’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(b) 
NONGOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS
AND
ACADEMIC 
INSTITUTIONS.—The 
Secretary 
may 
authorize 
the 
National 
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to exchange or furnish mapping, 
charting, and geodetic data, supplies, and services relating to areas 
outside of the United States to a nongovernmental organization 
or an academic institution engaged in geospatial information 
research or production of such areas pursuant to an agreement 
for the production or exchange of such data.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 454. Exchange of mapping, charting, and geodetic data 
with foreign countries, international organizations, 
nongovernmental 
organizations, 
and 
academic 
institutions’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of subchapter II of chapter 22 of such title is amended 
by striking the item relating to section 454 and inserting the 
following new item: 
‘‘454. Exchange of mapping, charting, and geodetic data with foreign countries, 
international organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and aca-
demic institutions.’’. 
SEC. 924. OZONE WIDGET FRAMEWORK. 
(a) MECHANISM FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION 
FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYSIS TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS.—The 
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, acting 
through the Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency, 
shall implement a mechanism to publish and maintain on the 
public Internet the application programming interface specifica-
tions, a developer’s toolkit, source code, and such other information 
on, and resources for, the Ozone Widget Framework (OWF) as 
the Chief Information Officer considers necessary to permit individ-
uals and companies to develop, integrate, and test analysis tools 
and applications for use by the Department of Defense and the 
elements of the intelligence community. 
(b) PROCESS FOR VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION OF IMPROVEMENTS 
BY PRIVATE SECTOR.—In addition to the requirement under sub-
section (a), the Chief Information Officer shall also establish a 
process by which private individuals and companies may voluntarily 
contribute the following: 
(1) Improvements to the source code and documentation 
for the Ozone Widget Framework. 
(2) Alternative or compatible implementations of the pub-
lished application programming interface specifications for the 
Framework.
H. R. 1540—243 
(c) ENCOURAGEMENT OF USE AND DEVELOPMENT.—The Chief 
Information Officer shall, whenever practicable, encourage and 
foster the use, support, development, and enhancement of the Ozone 
Widget Framework by the computer industry and commercial 
information technology vendors, including the development of tools 
that are compatible with the Framework. 
SEC. 925. PLAN FOR INCORPORATION OF ENTERPRISE QUERY AND 
CORRELATION CAPABILITY INTO THE DEFENSE INTEL-
LIGENCE INFORMATION ENTERPRISE. 
(a) PLAN REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Intel-
ligence shall develop a plan for the incorporation of an enter-
prise query and correlation capability into the Defense Intel-
ligence Information Enterprise (DI2E). 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) include an assessment of all the current and 
planned advanced query and correlation systems which 
operate on large centralized databases that are deployed 
or to be deployed in elements of the Defense Intelligence 
Information Enterprise; and 
(B) determine where duplication can be eliminated, 
how use of these systems can be expanded, whether these 
systems can be operated collaboratively, and whether they 
can and should be integrated with the enterprise-wide 
query and correlation capability required pursuant to para-
graph (1). 
(b) PILOT PROGRAM.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Under Secretary shall conduct a 
pilot program to demonstrate an enterprisewide query and 
correlation capability through the Defense Intelligence Informa-
tion Enterprise program. 
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the pilot program shall be 
to demonstrate the capability of an enterprisewide query and 
correlation system to achieve the following: 
(A) To conduct complex, simultaneous queries by a 
large number of users and analysts across numerous, large 
distributed data stores with response times measured in 
seconds. 
(B) To be scaled up to operate effectively on all the 
data holdings of the Defense Intelligence Information 
Enterprise. 
(C) To operate across multiple levels of security with 
data guards. 
(D) To operate effectively on both unstructured data 
and structured data. 
(E) To extract entities, resolve them, and (as appro-
priate) mask them to protect sources and methods, privacy, 
or both. 
(F) To control access to data by means of on-line elec-
tronic user credentials, profiles, and authentication. 
(3) TERMINATION.—The pilot program conducted under this 
subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2014. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than November 1, 2012, the Under 
Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 
a report on the actions undertaken by the Under Secretary to 
carry out this section. The report shall set forth the plan developed
H. R. 1540—244 
under subsection (a) and a description and assessment of the pilot 
program conducted under subsection (b). 
(d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives. 
SEC. 926. FACILITIES FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION OR SPECIAL 
OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES ABROAD. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2682 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The maintenance and repair’’ and inserting 
‘‘(a) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.—Subject to subsection (c), the 
maintenance and repair’’; 
(2) by designating the second sentence as subsection (b), 
realigning such subsection so as to be indented two ems from 
the left margin, and inserting ‘‘JURISDICTION.—’’ before ‘‘A real 
property facility’’; 
(3) in subsection (b), as designated by paragraph (2) of 
this subsection, by striking ‘‘A real property’’ and inserting 
‘‘Subject to subsection (c), a real property’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) FACILITIES FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION OR FOR SPECIAL 
OPERATIONS ABROAD.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
requirements of subsections (a) and (b) if necessary to provide 
security for authorized intelligence collection or special operations 
activities abroad undertaken by the Department of Defense.’’. 
(b) SUNSET.—Effective on September 30, 2015, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construc-
tion for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later— 
(1) subsection (a) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 
Code, as designated and amended by subsection (a)(1) of this 
section, is amended by striking ‘‘Subject to subsection (c), the 
maintenance and repair’’ and inserting ‘‘The maintenance and 
repair’’; 
(2) subsection (b) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 
Code, as designated by subsection (a)(2) and amended by sub-
section (a)(3) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘Subject 
to subsection (c), a real property’’ and inserting ‘‘A real prop-
erty’’; and 
(3) subsection (c) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a)(4) of this section, is repealed. 
Subtitle D—Total Force Management 
SEC. 931. GENERAL POLICY FOR TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT. 
(a) REVISION OF GENERAL PERSONNEL POLICY SECTION.—Sec-
tion 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows: