SEC. 2010. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORA-
TION. 
Section 206(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330(d)) is amended by striking 
‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
SEC. 2011. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION 
AND HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES. 
Section 314 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2321) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 314. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION 
AND HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES. 
‘‘Activities currently performed by personnel under 
the direction of the Secretary in connection with the oper-
ation and maintenance of navigation or hydroelectric 
power generating facilities, including all personnel under 
the direction of the Secretary in connection with the oper-
ation and maintenance of navigational infrastructure such 
as floodgates, locks, and dams, at Corps of Engineers 
water resources projects, are considered to be inherently 
governmental functions and not commercial activities. 
This section does not prohibit contracting out major main-
tenance or other functions that are currently contracted 
out or studying services not directly connected with project 
maintenance and operations.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2012. REPEAL. 
Section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (31 U.S.C. 6505 note; 114 Stat. 2592) is re-
pealed. 
SEC. 2013. COST ESTIMATES FOR FEASIBILITY REPORTS. 
Section 905(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) is amended by adding at 
the end the following: 
‘‘(5) COST
ESTIMATES
FOR
FEASIBILITY
RE-
PORTS.—In preparing a feasibility report under this 
subsection, the Secretary shall include in the report, 
and any budget documents (including justification 
materials) submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of 
title 31, United States Code, an accounting of the 
total cost of the recommended plan and an estimate 
of the Federal and non-Federal participation in the 
plan based on the following scenarios: 
‘‘(A) The cost of the project based on opti-
mal levels of Federal funding for the rec-
ommended plan. 
‘‘(B) The estimated cost of the project, 
based on a 50 percent increase in the period for 
implementation of the recommended plan. 
‘‘(C) The estimated cost of the project, 
based on a 100 percent increase in the period 
for implementation of the recommended plan.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2014. MITIGATION STATUS REPORT. 
Section 2036(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2283a) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (4); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) INFORMATION
INCLUDED.—In reporting 
the status of all projects included in the report, the 
Secretary shall— 
‘‘(A) use a uniform methodology for deter-
mining the status of all projects included in the 
report; 
‘‘(B) use a methodology that describes 
both a qualitative and quantitative status for all 
projects in the report; and 
‘‘(C) provide specific dates for and partici-
pants in the consultations required under sec-
tion 906(d)(4)(B) of the Water Resources De-
velopment 
Act 
of 
1986 
(33 
U.S.C. 
2283(d)(4)(B)).’’. 
TITLE III—PROJECT-RELATED 
PROVISIONS 
SEC. 3001. DOUGLAS HARBOR, JUNEAU, ALASKA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for navigation, Douglas Harbor, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Juneau, Alaska, being carried out under section 107 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $7,000,000. 
SEC. 3002. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CON-
TROL PROJECT, ARIZONA. 
The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and trib-
utaries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4606) and modified by section 303 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), section 302 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2600), and section 3008 of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1107), is further modi-
fied to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $55,500,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $50,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $5,400,000. 
SEC. 3003. RIO DE FLAG, ARIZONA. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Rio de Flag, 
Flagstaff, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2576) and modified by section 3007 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1107), is fur-
ther modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $77,000,000, with an estimated 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Federal cost of $50,000,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $27,000,000. 
SEC. 3004. TRES RIOS, ARIZONA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Ari-
zona, authorized by section 101(b)(4) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $230,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $149,500,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $80,500,000. 
SEC. 3005. RUSSIAN RIVER PROJECT, SONOMA COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA. 
The project for flood control, water conservation, and 
related purposes in the Russian River basin, California, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 177), and the project for Russian River, 
Dry Creek, California, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), are modified 
as follows: 
(1) The Secretary shall review the biological 
opinion on the water supply, flood control, and chan-
nel maintenance operations conducted by the Corps 
of Engineers, the Sonoma County Water Agency, 
and the Mendocino County Russian River Flood 
Control District, as transmitted by the National 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Sep-
tember 24, 2008. 
(2) If the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary is authorized to construct 
the project at a total cost of $92,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $59,800,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $32,200,000. 
SEC. 3006. SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The project for flood control, environmental restora-
tion, and recreation, South Sacramento County streams, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(8) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $104,300,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $67,500,000 and an estimated non-Fed-
eral cost of $36,800,000. 
SEC. 3007. CHATFIELD RESERVOIR, COLORADO. 
Section 116 of the Energy and Water Development 
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009 (123 Stat. 
608) is amended by striking ‘‘Colorado Department of 
Natural Resources is authorized’’ and inserting ‘‘Colorado 
Department of Natural Resources, or its assignee, is au-
thorized’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5892.IH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS