datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
A BILL 
To provide for the conveyance of National Forest System 
land in the State of Louisiana. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:38 Sep 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H940.RH
H940
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
602 
(16) Section 873(a)(4) (122 Stat. 4558; 10 
U.S.C. 6101 note) is amended by striking ‘‘to Gov-
ernment’’ and inserting ‘‘to the Government’’. 
(17) Section 1111 (10 U.S.C. 143 note), as 
amended by section 1109 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2492), is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘sec-
tion 821’’ and inserting ‘‘section 833’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in the matter preceding paragraph 
(1), by striking ‘‘secretary of a military de-
partment’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of a 
military department’’; 
(ii) in paragraph (1)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘the the require-
ments’’ and inserting ‘‘the require-
ments’’; and 
(II) by striking ‘‘this title’’ and 
inserting ‘‘such title’’; and 
(iii) in paragraph (2), by striking 
‘‘any any of the following’’ and inserting 
‘‘any of the following’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00602
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
591 
HR 6523 PCS
(34) Section 2433(a)(1) is amended by striking 
‘‘section 
2430a(c)’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘section 
2430a(d)’’. 
(35) Section 2433a(b)(2)(B) is amended by 
striking ‘‘section 181(g)((1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 
181(g)(1)’’. 
(36) Section 2476(d)(2)(D) is amended by 
striking ‘‘Navy Depots’’ and inserting ‘‘Navy de-
pots’’. 
(37) Section 2488(f) is amended by striking 
‘‘Armed Forces’’ both places it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(38) Section 2533a(d) is amended in para-
graphs (1) and (4) by striking ‘‘(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), or 
(b)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(1)(A) or (b)(2)’’. 
(39) Section 2603 is amended by striking 
‘‘Armed Forces’’ both places it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(40) Section 2642(a)(3) is amended by striking 
‘‘During the five-year period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘Dur-
ing the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and 
ending on October 28, 2014’’. 
(41) Section 2667(e) is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:54 Dec 19, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00591
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.PCS
H6523
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(1) PROHIBITED ACTS.— 
(A) RECORDKEEPING.—Section 301(e) of 
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 331(e)) is amended— 
(i) 
by 
inserting 
‘‘503C,’’ 
after 
‘‘417(g),’’; and 
(ii) 
by 
inserting 
‘‘503C,’’ 
after 
‘‘417,’’. 
(B) ADULTERATION.—Section 501 of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 351) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘(j) If it is a drug that was manufactured (as defined 
in section 503C) by a manufacturer that is or was at the 
time of such manufacture in violation of section 503C be-
cause of the failure to have in effect or implement an effec-
tive quality system in accordance with such section.’’. 
(2) SYSTEM
REQUIREMENTS.—The Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is amended by insert-
ing after section 503B (21 U.S.C. 353b) the fol-
lowing: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:08 Dec 20, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6543.IH
H6543
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
sistance for the payment of training costs under sub-
section (b)(1) is equal to the number (including any 
fraction) determined by dividing the total amount of 
educational assistance paid such individual for such 
training costs by the full-time monthly institutional 
rate of educational assistance which, except for sub-
section (b)(1), such individual would otherwise be 
paid under such chapter. 
(4) CHAPTER 1606.—The number of months of 
entitlement charged an individual under chapter 
1606 of title 10, United States Code, for educational 
assistance for the payment of training costs under 
subsection (b)(1) is equal to the number (including 
any fraction) determined by dividing the total 
amount of educational assistance paid such indi-
vidual for such training costs by the full-time 
monthly institutional rate of educational assistance 
which, except for subsection (b)(1), such individual 
would otherwise be paid under such chapter. 
(5) CHAPTER 1607.—The number of months of 
entitlement charged an individual under chapter 
1607 of title 10, United States Code, for educational 
assistance for the payment of training costs under 
subsection (b)(1) is equal to the number (including 
any fraction) determined by dividing the total 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:47 Feb 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H942.IH
H942
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
111TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 946 
AN ACT 
To enhance citizen access to Government informa-
tion and services by establishing that Govern-
ment documents issued to the public must be 
written clearly, and for other purposes.
•HRES 123 IH 
SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 
Of the amount specified in section 1— 
(1) not more than $10,336,207 shall be avail-
able for expenses incurred during the period begin-
ning at noon on January 3, 2009, and ending imme-
diately before noon on January 3, 2010; and 
(2) not more than $11,102,856 shall be avail-
able for expenses incurred during the period begin-
ning at noon on January 3, 2010, and ending imme-
diately before noon on January 3, 2011. 
SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 
Payments under this resolution shall be made on 
vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 
Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 
directed by the Committee on House Administration. 
SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 
Amounts made available under this resolution shall 
be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Committee on House Administration. 
Æ 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
05:25 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR123.IH
HR123
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
(5) The pilot program shall support the effort 
of the Secretary of Defense to use the military as a 
test bed to demonstrate innovative energy tech-
nologies. 
(d) IMPLEMENTATION AND DURATION.—If the Sec-
retary of Defense carries out a pilot program under this 
section, such pilot program shall begin by not later than 
July 1, 2011, and shall be not less than three years in 
duration. 
(e) REPORTS.— 
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—If the Secretary of De-
fense carries out a pilot program under this section, 
the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate con-
gressional committees by not later than October 1, 
2011, an initial report that provides an update on 
the implementation of the pilot program, including 
an identification of the selected military installation 
and national laboratory partner and a description of 
technologies under evaluation. 
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days 
after completion of a pilot program under this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a report on the pilot pro-
gram, including any findings and recommendations 
of the Secretary. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
H. R. 6523—49 
Subtitle D—Reports 
SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 
CORROSION PREVENTION PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. 
Section 2228(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘The’’ and 
inserting ‘‘For the fiscal year covered by the report and 
the preceding fiscal year, the’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(E) For the fiscal year covered by the report and the 
preceding fiscal year, the amount of funds requested in the 
budget for each project or activity described in subsection (d) 
compared to the funding requirements for the project or 
activity.’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ‘‘, including the annex to the report 
described in paragraph (3)’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) Each report under this section shall include, in an annex 
to the report, a copy of the annual corrosion report most recently 
submitted by the corrosion control and prevention executive of 
each military department under section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan 
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4567; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note).’’. 
SEC. 332. MODIFICATION AND REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING 
REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) PRIORITIZATION OF FUNDS.—Subsection (a) of section 323 
of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the global war on ter-
rorism’’ and inserting ‘‘overseas contingency operations’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘units trans-
forming to modularity’’ and inserting ‘‘modular units’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2012’’ and 
inserting ‘‘2015’’. 
(b) BUDGET INFORMATION.—Subsection (b) of such section is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘the global war on terrorism’’ and 
inserting ‘‘overseas contingency operations’’; and 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘units transforming 
to modularity’’ and inserting ‘‘modular units’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end and inserting 
a period; and 
(C) by striking subparagraph (C); and 
(2) by striking paragraph (3). 
(c) ANNUAL REPORT
ON ARMY PROGRESS.—Subsection (c) of 
such section is amended—
will enable the phased, adaptive approach to missile 
defense in Europe to be operated in a flexible, 
adaptable, and survivable manner. 
(4) A description of the status of the develop-
ment or production of the various elements of the 
phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Eu-
rope, particularly the development of the standard 
missile-3, block IIA and block IIB interceptors, in-
cluding the technical readiness levels of those sys-
tems under development and the plans for retiring 
the technical risks of such systems. 
(5) A description of the advances in technology 
that are expected to permit enhanced defensive capa-
bility of the phased, adaptive approach to missile de-
fense in Europe, including airborne infrared sensor 
technology, space sensor technology, and enhanced 
battle management, command, control, and commu-
nications. 
(6) A discussion of how the phased, adaptive 
approach to missile defense in Europe will meet the 
operational needs of the commander of the United 
States European Command, and how it relates to 
plans to use a phased, adaptive approach to missile 
defense in other geographic regions. 
(7) An explanation of— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
795 
(2) For the construction of phase 11 of a muni-
tions demilitarization facility at Blue Grass Army 
Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 
113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 
Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), 
and section 2414 of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of 
Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 
2412 of this Act, $59,402,000. 
SEC. 2412. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 
835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division 
B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00795
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(f) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com-
mittees’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the 
Committee on Science and Technology of the 
House of Representatives; and 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate. 
(2) The term ‘‘microgrid’’ means an integrated 
energy system consisting of interconnected loads and 
distributed energy resources (including generators, 
energy storage devices, and smart controls) that can 
operate with the utility grid or in an intentional 
islanding mode. 
(3) The term ‘‘national laboratory’’ means— 
(A) a national laboratory (as defined in 
section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 
U.S.C. 15801)); or 
(B) a national security laboratory (as de-
fined in section 3281 of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471)). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 1517 EH 
on Financial Services or his designee. The Chair may not en-
tertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the bill 
(as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII). 
Attest: 
Clerk.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in this or any 
other Act to the ‘‘National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2011’’ shall be deemed to refer to the ‘‘Ike 
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF 
CONTENTS. 
(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into three divi-
sions as follows: 
(1) Division A—Department of Defense Au-
thorizations. 
(2) Division B—Military Construction Author-
izations. 
(3) Division C—Department of Energy Na-
tional Security Authorizations and Other Authoriza-
tions. 
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for 
this Act is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title. 
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. 
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. 
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 101. Army. 
Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. 
Sec. 103. Air Force. 
Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. 
Subtitle B—Navy Programs 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(3) The principal Navy airborne signals intel-
ligence capability today is the EP-3E Airborne Re-
connaissance 
Integrated 
Electronic 
System 
II 
(ARIES II)—the aircraft and associated electronic 
equipment of this system are aging and will require 
replacement or substantial ongoing upgrades to con-
tinue to meet requirements. 
(4) The Special Projects Aircraft (SPA) plat-
form of the Navy is the second critical element in 
the airborne signals intelligence capability of the 
Navy and provides the Navy its most advanced, com-
prehensive multi-intelligence and quick-reaction ca-
pability available. 
(b) REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN CAPABILITIES.— 
(1) PROHIBITION
ON
RETIREMENT
OF
PLAT-
FORMS.—The Secretary of the Navy may not retire 
(or to prepare to retire) the EP-3E Airborne Recon-
naissance Integrated Electronic System II or Special 
Projects Aircraft platform. 
(2) MAINTENANCE OF PLATFORMS.—The Sec-
retary of the Navy shall continue to maintain, sus-
tain, and upgrade the EP-3E Airborne Reconnais-
sance Integrated Electronic System II and Special 
Projects Aircraft platforms in order to provide capa-
bilities necessary to operate effectively against rap-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
idly evolving threats and to meet combatant com-
mander operational intelligence, surveillance, and re-
connaissance requirements. 
(3) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than February 
1, 2011, and annually thereafter, the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Intelligence and the Vice 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly 
certify to Congress the following: 
(A) The Secretary of the Navy is maintain-
ing and sustaining the EP-3E Airborne Recon-
naissance Integrated Electronic System II and 
Special Projects Aircraft platform in a manner 
that meets the intelligence, surveillance, and re-
connaissance requirements of the commanders 
of the combatant commands. 
(B) Any plan for the retirement or replace-
ment of the EP-3E Airborne Reconnaissance 
Integrated Electronic System II or Special 
Projects Aircraft platform will provide, in the 
aggregate, an equivalent or superior capability 
and capacity to the platform concerned. 
(4) TERMINATION.—The requirements of this 
subsection with respect to the EP-3E Airborne Re-
connaissance Integrated Electronic System II or the 
Special Projects Aircraft platform shall expire on the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
commencement of the fielding by the Navy of a plat-
form or mix of platforms and sensors that are, in 
the aggregate, equivalent or superior to the EP-3E 
Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic Sys-
tem II (spiral 3) or the Special Projects Aircraft 
(P909) platform. 
(c) RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER OF SABER FOCUS 
PROGRAM ISR CAPABILITIES.— 
(1) RESTRICTION.—The Secretary of the Navy 
may not transfer the Saber Focus unmanned aerial 
system, associated equipment, or processing, exploi-
tation, and dissemination capabilities of the Saber 
Focus program to the Secretary of the Air Force 
until 30 days after the Secretary of the Air Force 
certifies to the congressional defense committees 
that after such a transfer, the Secretary of the Air 
Force will provide intelligence, surveillance, and re-
connaissance (hereinafter in this section referred to 
as ‘‘ISR’’) capabilities at the same or greater capa-
bility and capacity level as the capability or capacity 
level at which the Saber Focus program provides 
such capabilities to the area of operations concerned 
as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) CONTINUED NAVY PROVISION OF CAPABILI-
TIES.—The Secretary of the Navy shall continue to 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
provide Saber Focus ISR program capabilities at the 
same or greater capability and capacity level as the 
capability or capacity level at which the Saber Focus 
program provides such capabilities as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act to the area of operations 
concerned until— 
(A) the certification referred to in para-
graph (1) is provided to the congressional de-
fense committees; or 
(B) 30 days after the Secretary of Defense 
certifies to the congressional defense commit-
tees that the ISR capabilities of the Saber 
Focus program are no longer required to miti-
gate the ISR requirements of the combatant 
commander in the area of operations concerned. 
SEC. 113. REPORT ON NAVAL FORCE STRUCTURE AND MIS-
SILE DEFENSE. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2011, the 
Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary 
of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations, shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
the force structure requirements of the major combatant 
surface vessels with respect to ballistic missile defense. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report shall include 
the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
(1) An analysis of whether the requirement for 
sea-based missile defense can be accommodated by 
upgrading Aegis ships that exist as of the date of 
the report or by procuring additional combatant sur-
face vessels. 
(2) A discussion of whether such sea-based mis-
sile defense will require increasing the overall num-
ber of combatant surface vessels beyond the require-
ment of 88 cruisers and destroyers in the 313-ship 
fleet plan of the Navy. 
(3) A discussion of the process for determining 
the number of Aegis ships needed by each com-
mander of the combatant commands to fulfill bal-
listic missile defense requirements, including (in con-
sultation with the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of 
Staff) the number of such ships needed to support 
the phased, adaptive approach to ballistic missile de-
fense in Europe. 
(4) A discussion of the impact of Aegis Ashore 
missile defense deployments, as well as deployment 
of other elements of the ballistic missile defense sys-
tem, on Aegis ballistic missile defense ship force 
structure requirements. 
(5) A discussion of the potential effect of bal-
listic missile defense operations on the ability of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Navy to meet surface fleet demands in each geo-
graphic area and for each mission set. 
(6) An evaluation of how the Aegis ballistic 
missile defense program can succeed as part of a 
balanced fleet of adequate size and strength to meet 
the security needs of the United States. 
(7) A description of both the shortfalls and the 
benefits of expected technological advancements in 
the sea-based missile defense program. 
(8) A description of the anticipated plan for de-
ployment of Aegis ballistic missile defense ships 
within the context of the fleet response plan. 
SEC. 114. REPORTS ON SERVICE-LIFE EXTENSION OF F/A–18 
AIRCRAFT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY. 
(a) COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SERVICE LIFE EX-
TENSION OF F/A–18 AIRCRAFT.—Before the Secretary of 
the Navy may enter into a program to extend the service 
life of F/A–18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, the Secretary 
shall— 
(1) conduct a cost-benefit analysis, in accord-
ance with Office of Management and Budget Cir-
cular A–94, comparing extending the service life of 
existing F/A–18 aircraft with procuring additional 
F/A–18E or F/A–18F aircraft as a means of man-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
aging the shortfall of the Department of the Navy 
in strike fighter aircraft; and 
(2) submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report on such cost-benefit analysis. 
(b) ELEMENTS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.—The 
cost-benefit analysis required by subsection (a)(1) shall in-
clude the following: 
(1) An estimate of the full costs, over the pe-
riod covered by the future-years defense program 
submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, 
United States Code, with the budget of the Presi-
dent, of extending legacy F/A–18 aircraft beyond 
8,600 hours, including— 
(A) any increases in operation and mainte-
nance costs associated with operating such air-
craft beyond a service life of 8,600 hours; and 
(B) the costs with respect to the airframe, 
avionics, software, and aircraft subsystems and 
components required to remain relevant in 
countering future threats and meeting the 
warfighting requirements of the commanders of 
the combatant commands. 
(2) An estimate of the full costs, over the pe-
riod covered by such future-years defense program, 
of procuring such additional F/A–18E or F/A–18F 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:50 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6523.IH
H6523
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS