datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 529 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 529 plans. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 26, 2015 
Ms. JENKINS of Kansas (for herself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 
529 plans. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT AL-
LOWED AS A QUALIFIED HIGHER EDUCATION 
EXPENSE FOR SECTION 529 ACCOUNTS. 
(a) MADE PERMANENT.—Clause (iii) of section 
529(e)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking ‘‘in 2009 or 2010’’. 
(b) ONLY
FOR USE PRIMARILY
BY
THE BENE-
FICIARY.—Clause (iii) of section 529(e)(3)(A) of such 
Code is amended by striking ‘‘used by the beneficiary and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jan 30, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.IH
H529
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
the beneficiary’s family’’ and inserting ‘‘used primarily by 
the beneficiary’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to expenses paid or incurred after 
December 31, 2014. 
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION AGGREGATION RE-
QUIREMENTS. 
(a) 
IN
GENERAL.—Clause 
(ii) 
of 
section 
529(c)(3)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by inserting before the comma at the end the 
following: ‘‘, except for purposes of calculating the earn-
ings portion of any distribution.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to distributions after December 31, 
2014. 
SEC. 3. CONTRIBUTION OF AMOUNTS PREVIOUSLY DIS-
TRIBUTED IN CASE OF WITHDRAWAL FROM 
SCHOOL. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 529(c) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS 
RELATING TO WITHDRAWAL FROM SCHOOL.—In 
the case of a beneficiary who receives a refund 
of any qualified higher education expenses from 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jan 30, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.IH
H529
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
an eligible educational institution in connection 
with withdrawal from enrollment at such insti-
tution, subparagraph (A) shall not apply to that 
portion of any distribution for the taxable year 
which is recontributed to a qualified tuition pro-
gram of which such individual is a beneficiary, 
but only to the extent such recontribution is 
made not later than 60 days after the date of 
such refund and does not exceed the refunded 
amount.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply with respect to distributions after 
December 31, 2014. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:59 Jan 30, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H529.IH
H529
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
program (including the extent to which grad-
uates improve their subject matter knowledge
and teaching ability as a result of their partici-
pation in the program) and to improve its pro-
gram, using information generated through
those procedures;
‘‘(K) the success of the program in grad-
uating students who are fully qualified to teach
to high standards in the State or region served
by the institution;
‘‘(L) the quality of the program’s grad-
uates, as documented through such evidence as
the graduates’ record of obtaining (and retain-
ing) teaching positions and the opinions of
school district officials, in the State or region,
of the quality of those graduates;
‘‘(M) if applicable, the quality of the insti-
tution’s program for the preparation of school
principals and other school administrators, and
of the success of that program; and
‘‘(N) involvement and leadership of the in-
stitution in national, regional, and State efforts
to improve teacher education and licensure;
‘‘(3) evidence of the extent to which—
II 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 529 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2015 
Received 
AN ACT 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 
529 plans. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:16 Feb 28, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RDS
H529
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 529 RFS 
(6) The tax proposed by the President would 
discourage the use of 529 college savings plans, re-
quiring families and students to take on more debt. 
(7) Purchase of a computer represents a signifi-
cant higher education expense and therefore should 
be eligible for qualified distributions under 529 col-
lege savings plans. 
(b) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this Act to— 
(1) enact policies that strengthen 529 college 
savings plans; and 
(2) make 529 plans more modern, consumer- 
friendly, and responsive to the realities faced by stu-
dents today. 
SEC. 2. COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT PERMA-
NENTLY ALLOWED AS A QUALIFIED HIGHER 
EDUCATION EXPENSE FOR SECTION 529 AC-
COUNTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(e)(3)(A)(iii) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(iii) expenses for the purchase of 
computer or peripheral equipment (as de-
fined in section 168(i)(2)(B)), computer 
software 
(as 
defined 
in 
section 
197(e)(3)(B)), or Internet access and re-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 529 RFS 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) When the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
Reconciliation Act of 2001 became law, the tax 
treatment of section 529 college savings plans was 
changed so that qualified distributions were no 
longer taxed as income. The favorable tax treatment 
of college savings plans was made permanent with 
the passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 
(2) Section 529 college savings plans empower 
middle-class families to accumulate savings to offset 
the rising costs of attending college. 
(3) The latest data from the College Savings 
Plan Network shows that there are 11.83 million 
529 accounts open throughout all 50 states, which 
represent $244.5 billion in total assets. The average 
529 account size is $20,671. 
(4) States that sponsor 529 college savings 
plans have taken steps to ensure these plans are a 
tool that all families can use to save for college, in-
cluding setting minimum contributions as low as $25 
per month to encourage participation by families of 
all income levels. 
(5) The President’s fiscal year 2016 Budget 
proposes raising taxes by taxing certain future dis-
tributions made from 529 college savings plans. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 529 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
FEBRUARY 26, 2015 
Received 
APRIL 16, 2015 
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 
AN ACT 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 
529 plans. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 529 RFS 
lated services, if such equipment, software, 
or services are to be used primarily by the 
beneficiary during any of the years the 
beneficiary is enrolled at an eligible edu-
cational institution.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2014. 
SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION AGGREGATION RE-
QUIREMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara-
graph (D). 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to distributions after December 31, 
2014. 
SEC. 4. RECONTRIBUTION OF REFUNDED AMOUNTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 3, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS 
OF
REFUNDED
AMOUNTS.—In the case of a 
beneficiary who receives a refund of any quali-
fied higher education expenses from an eligible 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 529 RFS 
educational institution, subparagraph (A) shall 
not apply to that portion of any distribution for 
the taxable year which is recontributed to a 
qualified tuition program of which such indi-
vidual is a beneficiary, but only to the extent 
such recontribution is made not later than 60 
days after the date of such refund and does not 
exceed the refunded amount.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply with respect to refunds of 
qualified higher education expenses after December 
31, 2014. 
(2) TRANSITION RULE.—In the case of a refund 
of qualified higher education expenses received after 
December 31, 2014, and before the date of the en-
actment of this Act, section 529(c)(3)(D) of the In-
ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this sec-
tion) shall be applied by substituting ‘‘not later than 
60 days after the date of the enactment of this 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 529 RFS 
subparagraph’’ for ‘‘not later than 60 days after the 
date of such refund’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 
2015. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:41 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H529.RFS
H529
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2753
To amend the charter of Southeastern University of the District of Columbia.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 28, 1997
Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
A BILL
To amend the charter of Southeastern University of the
District of Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMITTING INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT
GRADUATES OF SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
TO SERVE ON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUST-
EES.
(a) In General.—Section 3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An
Act for the relief of the Southeastern University of the
Young Men’s Christian Association of the District of Co-
lumbia’’, approved August 19, 1937 (50 Stat. 697), as
amended by section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to
amend the charter of Southeastern University of the Dis-
trict of Columbia’’, approved October 10, 1966 (80 Stat.
883), is amended—
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘, one-
third of whom’’ and all that follows and inserting a
period; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘elected
for a term’’ and inserting ‘‘elected by the board for
a term’’.
(b) TREATMENT
OF
CURRENT
TRUSTEES.—The
amendment made by subsection (a) shall not affect the
term of office of any individual serving on the Board of
Trustees of Southeastern University as of the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Æ
‘‘COPPER RIVER MERIDIAN
‘‘T58S, R72E
‘‘Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, and 20.
‘‘(c) MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE.—The
maps and the legal description of the property described
in this section shall be maintained on file in the Office
of the Chief, United States Forest Service and in the Of-
fice of the Secretary of the Interior, Washington, District
of Columbia. The acreage cited in this section is approxi-
mate. If a discrepancy arises between the cited acreage
and the acreage depicted on the maps, the maps shall con-
trol. The maps do not constitute an attempt by the United
States to convey State or private property.
‘‘(d) CONSIDERATION.—The transfers authorized by
this section shall be made without consideration, except
as provided in this section.
‘‘(e) RELATION TO OTHER SECTIONS.—The property
transferred pursuant to this section shall be considered
land conveyed under and shall be subject to the provisions
of this Act.’’.
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2755
To provide financial assistance for higher education to the dependents of
Federal, State, and local public safety officers who are killed or perma-
nently and totally disabled as the result of a traumatic injury sustained
in the line of duty.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 28, 1997
Mr. STUPAK (for himself and Mr. RAMSTAD) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide financial assistance for higher education to the
dependents of Federal, State, and local public safety
officers who are killed or permanently and totally dis-
abled as the result of a traumatic injury sustained in
the line of duty.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Safety Officers
Educational Assistance Act of 1998’’.
SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
TO DEPENDENTS OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFI-
CERS KILLED OR PERMANENTLY AND TO-
TALLY DISABLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.
Part L of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.) is amend-
ed—
(1) in the heading for subpart 2, by striking
‘‘Civilian Federal Law Enforcement’’ and
inserting ‘‘Public Safety’’;
(2) in section 1211(l), by striking ‘‘civilian Fed-
eral law enforcement’’ and inserting ‘‘public safety’’;
(3) in section 1212(a)(1)(A), by striking ‘‘Fed-
eral law enforcement’’ and inserting ‘‘public safety’’;
(4) in section 1216(a), by inserting ‘‘and each
dependent of a public safety officer killed in the line
of duty on or after October 1, 1997,’’ after ‘‘1992,’’.
(5) in section 1217—
(A) by striking paragraph (2); and
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and
(4) as (2) and (3), respectively.
Æ
IB
Union Calendar No. 444
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 2756
[Report No. 105–783]
To authorize an exchange of property between the Kake Tribal Corporation
and the Sealaska Corporation and the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 28, 1997
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
OCTOBER 6, 1998
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To authorize an exchange of property between the Kake
Tribal Corporation and the Sealaska Corporation and
the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kake Tribal Corpora-
tion Land Exchange Act’’.
SEC. 2. PROPERTY EXCHANGE.
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C.
1601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing new section:
‘‘SEC. 41. KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION PROPERTY EX-
CHANGE.
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY FOR EXCHANGE.—Upon transfer to
the United States of all right, title, and interest of the
Kake Tribal Corporation and the Sealaska Corporation in
and to the property described in subsection (b)(1), the
Secretary of the Interior Agriculture shall transfer—
‘‘(1) to the Kake Tribal Corporation, subject to
valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of
the United States in and to the surface estate of the
property described in subsection (b)(2); and
‘‘(2) to the Sealaska Corporation, subject to
valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of
the United States in and to the subsurface estate of
the property described in subsection (b)(2).
‘‘(b) PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS.—
‘‘(1) PROPERTY TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE
UNITED STATES.—The property to be transferred to
the United States pursuant to subsection (a) is de-
scribed as the surface estate owned by the Kake
Tribal Corporation and the subsurface estate owned
by the Sealaska Corporation, of the approximately
2,427 acres depicted on the map dated September 1,
1997, and labeled ‘Attachment A’, and further de-
scribed as follows:
‘‘COPPER RIVER MERIDIAN
‘‘T56S, R72E
‘‘Sections 13, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, and 36.
‘‘(2) PROPERTY TO BE TRANSFERRED TO KAKE
TRIBAL
CORPORATION
AND
SEALASKA
CORPORA-
TION.—The property to be transferred to the Kake
Tribal Corporation and the Sealaska Corporation
pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a)
is the surface estate and the subsurface estate, re-
spectively, to the approximately 2,427 acres of Fed-
eral land depicted on the maps dated September 1,
1997, and labeled ‘Attachment B’ and ‘Attachment
C’, and further described as follows:
‘‘COPPER RIVER MERIDIAN
‘‘T57S, R74E
‘‘Sections 18 and 19;
‘‘COPPER RIVER MERIDIAN
‘‘T57S, R72E
‘‘Sections 31 and 32;
‘‘COPPER RIVER MERIDIAN
‘‘T58S, R71E
‘‘Section 13; and
H. R. 4807
One Hundred Eighth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four
An Act
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 140 Sac-
ramento Street in Rio Vista, California, as the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service located at
140 Sacramento Street in Rio Vista, California, shall be known
and designated as the ‘‘Adam G. Kinser Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,
or other record of the United States to the facility referred to
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Adam G.
Kinser Post Office Building’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
186
TITLE IX—EXPIRATION AND EX-
TENSION 
OF 
CERTAIN 
AU-
THORIZATIONS
SEC. 901. EXPIRATION OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AU-
THORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO
BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles III through VIII for military
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall ex-
pire on the later of—
(1) October 1, 2000; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2001.
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to
authorizations for military construction projects, land ac-
quisition, family housing projects and facilities, and con-
tributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
curity Investment program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor), for which appropriated funds have
been obligated before the later of—
279
1998 through 2003, to enable the Secretary of the
Interior’’; and
(2) in subsection (b), by striking out ‘‘the sum
of $12,000,000’’ and all that follows through ‘‘to en-
able the Secretary of Agriculture’’ and inserting in
lieu thereof ‘‘$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years
1998 through 2003, to enable the Secretary of Agri-
culture’’.
Æ
‘‘(ii) apply to petitions filed during such 1-year
period if the facility states in each such petition that
it continues to comply with the conditions in the at-
testation.
‘‘(D) A facility may meet the requirements under this
paragraph with respect to more than 1 registered nurse
in a single petition.
‘‘(E)(i) The Secretary of Labor shall compile and
make available for public examination in a timely manner
in Washington, D.C., a list identifying facilities which
have filed petitions for nonimmigrants under section
101(a)(15)(H)(i)(C) and, for each such facility, a copy of
the facility’s attestation under subparagraph (A) (and ac-
companying documentation) and each such petition filed
by the facility.
‘‘(ii) The Secretary of Labor shall establish a process,
including reasonable time limits, for the receipt, investiga-
tion, and disposition of complaints respecting a facility’s
failure to meet conditions attested to or a facility’s mis-
representation of a material fact in an attestation. Com-
plaints may be filed by any aggrieved person or organiza-
tion (including bargaining representatives, associations
deemed appropriate by the Secretary, and other aggrieved
parties as determined under regulations of the Secretary).
The Secretary shall conduct an investigation under this
clause if there is reasonable cause to believe that a facility
fails to meet conditions attested to.
‘‘(iii) Under such process, the Secretary shall provide,
within 180 days after the date such a complaint is filed,
for a determination as to whether or not a basis exists
to make a finding described in clause (iv). If the Secretary
determines that such a basis exists, the Secretary shall
provide for notice of such determination to the interested
parties and an opportunity for a hearing on the complaint
within 60 days of the date of the determination.
‘‘(iv) If the Secretary of Labor finds, after notice and
opportunity for a hearing, that a facility (for which an
attestation is made) has failed to meet a condition attested
to or that there was a misrepresentation of material fact
in the attestation, the Secretary shall notify the Attorney
General of such finding and may, in addition, impose such
other administrative remedies (including civil monetary
penalties in an amount not to exceed $1,000 per nurse
per violation, with the total penalty not to exceed $10,000
per violation) as the Secretary determines to be appro-
priate. Upon receipt of such notice, the Attorney General
shall not approve petitions filed with respect to a facility
during a period of at least 1 year for nurses to be em-
ployed by the facility.
HR 2759 RFS
to the bargaining representative of the registered
nurses at the facility or, where there is no such bar-
gaining representative, notice of the filing has been
provided to registered nurses employed at the facility
through posting in conspicuous locations.
‘‘(vii) The facility will not, at any time, employ
a number of aliens issued visas or otherwise pro-
vided 
nonimmigrant 
status 
under 
section
101(a)(15)(H)(i)(c) that exceeds 33 percent of the
total number of registered nurses employed by the
facility.
‘‘(viii) The facility will not, with respect to any
alien issued a visa or otherwise provided non-
immigrant 
status 
under 
section
101(a)(15)(H)(i)(c)—
‘‘(I) authorize the alien to perform nursing
services at any worksite other than a worksite
controlled by the facility; or
‘‘(II) transfer the place of employment of
the alien from one worksite to another.
Nothing in clause (iv) shall be construed as requiring a
facility to have taken significant steps described in such
clause before the date of the enactment of the Health Pro-
fessional Shortage Area Nursing Relief Act of 1998. A
copy of the attestation shall be provided, within 30 days