IB
Union Calendar No. 74
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2445
[Report No. 103–135]
Making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 17, 1993
Mr. BEVILL, from the Committee on Appropriations, reported the following
bill; which was committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed
A BILL
Making appropriations for energy and water development
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the following sums are appropriated, out of any
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, for energy and
water development, and for other purposes, namely:
HR 2445 RH
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL
The following appropriations shall be expended under
the direction of the Secretary of the Army and the super-
vision of the Chief of Engineers for authorized civil func-
tions of the Department of the Army pertaining to rivers
and harbors, flood control, beach erosion, and related pur-
poses.
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
For expenses necessary for the collection and study
of basic information pertaining to river and harbor, flood
control, shore protection, and related projects, restudy of
authorized projects, miscellaneous investigations, and
when authorized by laws, surveys and detailed studies and
plans and specifications of projects prior to construction,
$207,540,000, to remain available until expended, of
which funds are provided for the following projects in the
amounts specified:
Central Basin Groundwater Project, California,
$750,000;
Los Angeles County Water Conservation, Cali-
fornia, $100,000;
HR 2445 RH
Los Angeles River Watercourse Improvement,
California, $300,000;
Norco Bluffs, California, $150,000;
Rancho Palos Verdes, California, $80,000;
Biscayne Bay, Florida, $700,000;
Tampa Harbor, Alafia River and Big Bend,
Florida, $250,000;
Indianapolis, White River, Central Waterfront,
Indiana, $4,000,000;
Lake George, Hobart, Indiana, $200,000;
Little Calumet River Basin (Cady Marsh
Ditch), Indiana, $310,000;
Ohio River Shoreline Flood Protection, Indiana,
$400,000;
Hazard, Kentucky, $250,000;
Brockton, Massachusetts, $350,000;
Passaic 
River 
Mainstem, 
New 
Jersey,
$17,000,000;
Broad Top Region, Pennsylvania, $400,000;
Juniata River Basin, Pennsylvania, $450,000;
Lackawanna River Basin Greenway Corridor,
Pennsylvania, $300,000;
Pocotaligo River and Swamp, South Carolina,
$400,000;
HR 2445 RH
Jennings 
Randolph 
Lake, 
West 
Virginia,
$400,000;
Monongahela River Comprehensive, West Vir-
ginia, $600,000; and
West Virginia Comprehensive, West Virginia,
$500,000.
CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
For the prosecution of river and harbor, flood control,
shore protection, and related projects authorized by laws;
and detailed studies, and plans and specifications, of
projects (including those for development with participa-
tion or under consideration for participation by States,
local governments, or private groups) authorized or made
eligible for selection by law (but such studies shall not con-
stitute a commitment of the Government to construction),
$1,389,138,000, to remain available until expended, of
which such sums as are necessary pursuant to Public Law
99–662 shall be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust
Fund, for one-half of the costs of construction and reha-
bilitation of inland waterways projects, including rehabili-
tation costs for the Lock and Dam 25, Mississippi River,
Illinois and Missouri, and GIWW-Brazos River Flood-
gates, Texas, projects, and of which funds are provided
for the following projects in the amounts specified:
Rillito River, Arizona, $4,200,000;
HR 2445 RH
Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkan-
sas, $3,500,000;
Coyote 
and 
Berryessa 
Creeks, 
California,
$4,000,000;
Sacramento 
River 
Flood 
Control 
Project
(Glenn-Colusa 
Irrigation 
District), 
California,
$400,000;
San 
Timoteo 
Creek 
(Santa 
Ana 
River
Mainstem), California, $12,000,000;
Sonoma 
Baylands 
Wetland 
Demonstration
Project, California, $4,000,000;
Central 
and 
Southern 
Florida, 
Florida,
$17,850,000;
Kissimmee River, Florida, $5,000,000;
Melaleuca 
Quarantine 
Facility, 
Florida,
$1,000,000;
Casino Beach, Illinois, $820,000;
McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, Illinois,
$13,000,000;
O’Hare Reservoir, Illinois, $5,000,000;
Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt,
Iowa, $2,700,000;
Barbourville (Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big
Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River), Ken-
tucky, $3,868,000;
HR 2445 RH
Harlan (Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big
Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River), Ken-
tucky, $15,432,000;
Pike County (Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big
Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River), Ken-
tucky, $5,000,000;
Salyersville, Kentucky, $1,000,000;
Williamsburg (Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big
Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River), Ken-
tucky, $700,000;
Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity (Hurricane
Protection), Louisiana, $24,119,000;
Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity (Jefferson
Parish), Louisiana, $200,000;
Red River Waterway, Mississippi River to
Shreveport, Louisiana, $65,000,000;
Anacostia River, Maryland and District of Co-
lumbia, $700,000;
Clinton River Spillway, Michigan, $2,000,000;
Silver Bay Harbor, Minnesota, $2,600,000;
Stillwater, Minnesota, $2,400,000;
Sowashee Creek, Mississippi, $3,240,000;
Molly Ann’s Brook, New Jersey, $1,000,000;
New York Harbor Collection and Removal of
Drift, New York and New Jersey, $3,900,000;
HR 2445 RH
Rochester Harbor, New York, $4,000,000;
Wilmington Harbor Ocean Bar, North Carolina,
$5,266,000;
West Columbus, Ohio, $5,000,000;
Lackawanna River Greenway Corridor, Penn-
sylvania, $2,000,000;
South Central Pennsylvania Environmental
Restoration Infrastructure and Resource Protection
Development 
Pilot 
Program, 
Pennsylvania,
$10,000,000;
Fort Point, Galveston, Texas, $1,500,000;
Lake O’ The Pines-Big Cypress Bayou, Texas,
$300,000;
Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas and
Oklahoma, $4,000,000;
Wallisville Lake, Texas, $1,000,000;
Richmond 
Filtration 
Plant, 
Virginia,
$1,000,000;
Southern West Virginia Environmental Res-
toration Infrastructure and Resource Protection De-
velopment 
Pilot 
Program, 
West 
Virginia,
$3,500,000; and
State Road and Ebner Coulees, LaCrosse and
Shelby, Wisconsin, $1,467,000.
HR 2445 RH
FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES,
ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MIS-
SISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE
For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood
control, and rescue work, repair, restoration, or mainte-
nance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by
flood, as authorized by law (33 U.S.C. 702a, 702g–1),
$352,475,000, to remain available until expended, of
which $2,400,000 is provided for the Eastern Arkansas
Region, Arkansas, project.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL
For expenses necessary for the preservation, oper-
ation, maintenance, and care of existing river and harbor,
flood control, and related works, including such sums as
may be necessary for the maintenance of harbor channels
provided by a State, municipality or other public agency,
outside of harbor lines, and serving essential needs of gen-
eral commerce and navigation; surveys and charting of
northern and northwestern lakes and connecting waters;
clearing and straightening channels; and removal of ob-
structions to navigation, $1,691,350,000, to remain avail-
able until expended, of which such sums as become avail-
able in the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, pursuant to
Public Law 99–662, may be derived from that fund, and
of which $18,000,000 shall be for construction, operation,
HR 2445 RH
and maintenance of outdoor recreation facilities, to be de-
rived from the special account established by the Land and
Water Conservation Act of 1965, as amended (16 U.S.C.
460l), and of which funds are provided for the following
projects in the amounts specified:
Tucson Diversion Channel, Arizona, $550,000;
Los Angeles River (Sepulveda Basin to Arroyo
Seco), California, $400,000;
Oceanside Experimental Sand Bypass, Califor-
nia, $4,000,000;
Los Angeles County Drainage Area (Hansen
Dam), California, $2,790,000;
Flint 
River 
Flood 
Control, 
Michigan,
$2,500,000;
Sauk Lake, Minnesota, $40,000; and
New 
Madrid 
County 
Harbor, 
Missouri,
$250,000:
Provided, That not to exceed $7,000,000 shall be available
for obligation for national emergency preparedness pro-
grams.
REGULATORY PROGRAM
For expenses necessary for administration of laws
pertaining to regulation of navigable waters and wetlands,
$92,000,000, to remain available until expended.
HR 2445 RH
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES
For expenses necessary for emergency flood control,
hurricane, and shore protection activities, as authorized
by section 5 of the Flood Control Act approved August
18, 1941, as amended, $20,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
OIL SPILL RESEARCH
For expenses necessary to carry out the purposes of
the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, pursuant to Title VII
of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, $350,000, to be derived
from the Fund and to remain available until expended.
GENERAL EXPENSES
For expenses necessary for general administration
and related functions in the Office of the Chief of Engi-
neers and offices of the Division Engineers; activities of
the Coastal Engineering Research Board, the Humphreys
Engineer Center Support Activity, and the Water Re-
sources Support Center, $148,500,000, to remain avail-
able until expended: Provided, That not to exceed
$54,855,000 of the funds provided in this Act shall be
available for general administration and related functions
in the Office of the Chief of Engineers: Provided further,
That no part of any other appropriation provided in Title
I of this Act shall be available to fund the activities of
the Office of the Chief of Engineers.
HR 2445 RH
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
During the current fiscal year the revolving fund,
Corps of Engineers, shall be available for purchase (not
to exceed 100 for replacement only) and hire of passenger
motor vehicles.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL
SEC. 101. None of the funds provided in this Act may
be used to close any Corps of Engineers District Office.
SEC. 102. None of the funds provided in this Act may
be used to transfer any functions of any Corps of Engi-
neers District Office.
SEC. 103. None of the funds provided in this Act may
be used to fund the activities of the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Civil Works.
SEC. 104. Any funds heretofore appropriated and
made available in Public Law 100–202 to carry out the
provisions for the harbor modifications of the Cleveland
Harbor, Ohio, project contained in Public Law 99–662;
and in Public Law 102–104 for the development of Gate-
way Park at the Lower Granite Lock and Dam Project,
Washington, may be utilized by the Secretary of the Army
in carrying out projects and activities funded by this Act.
SEC. 105. None of the funds provided in this Act
shall be used to implement Defense Management Review
HR 2445 RH
Decision No. 918, dated September 15, 1992, to transfer
from the Corps of Engineers property accountability of
automated data processing equipment and software ac-
quired with funds from the revolving fund established by
the Act of July 27, 1953, chapter 245, 33 U.S.C. 576.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT
For the purpose of carrying out provisions of the
Central Utah Project Completion Act, Public Law 102–
575 (106 Stat. 4605), $25,770,000, to remain available
until expended, of which $15,920,000 shall be to carry out
the activities authorized under title II of the Act, and of
which $9,850,000 shall be deposited into the Utah Rec-
lamation Mitigation and Conservation Account: Provided,
That of the amounts deposited into the Account,
$5,000,000 shall be considered the Federal Contribution
authorized by paragraph 402(b)(2) of the Act and
$4,850,000 shall be available to the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission to carry out the
activities authorized under title III of the Act: Provided
further, That, notwithstanding any other provision of law,
of the amounts available for activities authorized under
title II of the Act, not to exceed $500,000 shall be avail-
able for necessary expenses incurred in carrying out the
HR 2445 RH
responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior under the
Act.
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
For carrying out the functions of the Bureau of Rec-
lamation as provided in the Federal reclamation laws (Act
of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory
thereof or supplementary thereto) and other Acts applica-
ble to that Bureau as follows:
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
For engineering and economic investigations of pro-
posed Federal reclamation projects and studies of water
conservation and development plans and activities prelimi-
nary to the reconstruction, rehabilitation and betterment,
financial adjustment, or extension of existing projects, to
remain available until expended, $13,109,000: Provided,
That, of the total appropriated, the amount for program
activities which can be financed by the reclamation fund
shall be derived from that fund: Provided further, That
funds contributed by non-Federal entities for purposes
similar to this appropriation shall be available for expendi-
ture for the purposes for which contributed as though spe-
cifically appropriated for said purposes, and such amounts
shall remain available until expended.