IV 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. RES. 782 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations 
Security Council should sanction Iran for its noncompliance with the 
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 26, 2006 
Mr. WAMP (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 
Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. KUHL of New 
York, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Ms. FOXX, Mr. WICKER, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 
ISTOOK, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Ms. HART, Mr. SHAD-
EGG, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DAVIS of Ken-
tucky, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. FEENEY, 
Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GAR-
RETT of New Jersey, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. HAYWORTH) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Inter-
national Relations 
RESOLUTION 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United Nations Security Council should sanction Iran 
for its noncompliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation 
Treaty. 
Whereas, on August 8, 2005, Iran broke the International 
Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) seals on its uranium fa-
cility at Esfahan and began the process of conversion, 
one step before uranium enrichment; 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
05:44 May 04, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR782.IH
HR782
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
•HRES 782 IH 
Whereas, on September 24, 2005, the United States and the 
European Union achieved a majority vote of the IAEA 
board to declare Iran in noncompliance with the Nuclear 
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and refer the issue to 
the United Nations Security Council if Iran did not re-
turn to compliance with the Paris Agreement; 
Whereas, on January 3, 2006, Iran challenged the inter-
national community by announcing it would resume ura-
nium ‘‘research’’ activities and subsequently broke IAEA 
seals at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and at 
related locations; 
Whereas, on February 4, 2006, at an emergency IAEA board 
meeting, the board voted 27–3 in favor of a resolution to 
‘‘report’’ to the Security Council the steps required of 
Iran to return to compliance with the Paris Agreement; 
Whereas after this vote, Iran ceased allowing the voluntary 
IAEA inspections that had been agreed to in the previous 
negotiations with England, France, and Germany and 
had the IAEA remove some monitoring equipment; 
Whereas the IAEA report of February 27, 2006, stated that 
inspectors reportedly confirmed on February 14, 2006, 
that Iran had begun some enrichment activities involving 
10 centrifuges; and 
Whereas, on April 11, 2006, Iran announced the successful 
enrichment of uranium: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep-
resentatives that— 
(1) the United Nations Security Council should 
sanction Iran for its noncompliance with Nuclear 
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT); and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
05:44 May 04, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR782.IH
HR782
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
•HRES 782 IH 
(2) if the United Nations Security Council does 
not sanction Iran, the Secretary of State may with-
hold United States contributions to the United Na-
tions until proper action is taken by the United Na-
tions Security Council to return Iran to compliance 
with the NPT. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
05:44 May 04, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR782.IH
HR782
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS