I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1993 
To permit the chief executive of a State to create an exemption from certain 
requirements of Federal environmental laws for producers of agricultural 
commodities, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 23, 2015 
Mr. WALBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently deter-
mined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To permit the chief executive of a State to create an exemp-
tion from certain requirements of Federal environmental 
laws for producers of agricultural commodities, and for 
other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flexibility to Farm 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:17 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1993.IH
H1993
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(1) The agricultural community of the United 
States serves as the economic backbone of many 
communities and employs millions of Americans. 
(2) In recent years, one-size-fits-all policies 
issued by the Environmental Protection Agency have 
increased dramatically, requiring agricultural pro-
ducers to focus on regulation compliance rather than 
on growing the world’s healthiest, most abundant 
food supply. 
(3) Attempts by the Environmental Protection 
Agency to expand the definition of ‘‘Waters of the 
United States’’ under the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act expand the scope of Federal jurisdiction 
under that Act well beyond the intent of Congress, 
and would eliminate a central precept of that Act, 
which reserves certain waters to the exclusive juris-
diction of the States. 
(4) The Environmental Protection Agency’s 
proposed revisions to the existing National Ambient 
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone would 
impose significant costs on agriculture and rural 
counties. 
(5) An increasing number of poultry and live-
stock operations have been forced to apply for per-
mits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimi-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:17 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1993.IH
H1993
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
nation System resulting from the Environmental 
Protection Agency’s expanding definition of what 
constitutes a discharge under the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act. 
(6) Duplicative and costly permitting require-
ments under the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act will require additional National Pollutant Dis-
charge Elimination System permits for pesticide ap-
plications, subjecting pesticide users to unnecessary 
red tape and financial burdens while exposing them 
to the threat of unfounded litigation. 
(7) The Environmental Protection Agency pro-
posed rules to limit greenhouse gas emissions under 
section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act threaten the re-
liability and affordability of our Nation’s electricity 
supply and would impose an undue burden on agri-
cultural producers. 
(8) The Federal Government should not impose 
further rules or regulations that are overly burden-
some or cause economic hardship for the agricultural 
community. 
SEC. 3. UNDULY BURDENSOME REGULATIONS EXEMPTION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—If the chief executive of a State 
determines, in accordance with this section, that a require-
ment of a covered Federal environmental law, or a regula-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:17 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1993.IH
H1993
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
tion thereunder, has (or will have) a significant adverse 
effect on persons in the State acting in their capacity as 
farmers, such requirement or regulation shall not apply 
to persons in the State acting in that capacity. 
(b) PROCEDURE.—Before finalizing any determina-
tion under subsection (a), the chief executive of a State 
shall solicit and accept public comments regarding such 
determination for a period of not less than 90 days. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 
(1) 
COVERED
FEDERAL
ENVIRONMENTAL 
LAW.—The term ‘‘covered Federal environmental 
law’’ means— 
(A) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 
seq.), insofar as such Act applies to emissions 
of air pollutants other than emissions resulting 
from the combustion of any fossil fuel; and 
(B) the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). 
(2) FARMER.—The term ‘‘farmer’’ means— 
(A) a producer, as that term is defined 
in— 
(i) section 1111 of the Agricultural 
Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9011); and 
(ii) section 212 of the Agricultural 
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1635a); 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:17 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1993.IH
H1993
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(B) a dairy operation, as that term is de-
fined in section 1401 of the Agricultural Act of 
2014 (7 U.S.C. 9051); and 
(C) a producer of a specialty crop, as that 
term is defined in section 3 of the Specialty 
Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 (7 U.S.C. 
1621 note; Public Law 108–465). 
(3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means any of 
the several States of the United States, the District 
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 
United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American 
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and any other territory or possession of the 
United States. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:17 May 06, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1993.IH
H1993
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS