datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pechanga Band of 
Luiseno Mission Indians Land Transfer Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF LAND IN TRUST FOR PECHANGA 
BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS. 
(a) TRANSFER AND ADMINISTRATION.—Effective on 
the date of the enactment of this Act and subject to valid 
existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the Federal lands described in subsection 
(b), including all improvements thereon, appurtenances 
thereto, and rights to all minerals thereon or therein, in-
cluding oil and gas, water, and related resources, shall be 
held by the United States in trust for the Pechanga Band 
of Luiseno Mission Indians, a federally recognized Indian 
tribe. The transferred land shall be declared part of the 
Pechanga Indian Reservation and administered in accord-
ance with the laws and regulations generally applicable to 
property held in trust by the United States for an Indian 
tribe. 
(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The lands referred to in 
subsection (a) consist of approximately 990.74 acres in Riv-
erside County, California, as referenced on the map entitled, 
‘‘H.R. 4908, Pechanga Land Transfer Act’’ and dated Sep-
tember 13, 2004, which, before the transfer under such sub-
section, were administered by the Bureau of Land Manage-
ment and are more particularly described as follows:
(1) Sections 29, 30, and 32 of township 8 south, 
range 2 west, San Bernardino base and meridian. 
(2) Section 6 of township 9 south, range 2 west, 
San Bernardino base and meridian. 
(3) Mineral Survey 3540, section 22 of township 
5 south, range 4 west, San Bernardino base and me-
ridian. 
(c) SURVEY.—As soon as practicable after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Office of Cadastral Survey 
of the Bureau of Land Management shall complete a survey 
of the lands transferred under subsection (a) for the purpose 
of establishing the boundaries of the lands. 
(d) MAP ON FILE.—The map referred to in subsection 
(b) shall be on file in the appropriate offices of the Bureau 
of Land Management. 
(e) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—
(1) PUBLICATION.—On approval of the survey 
completed under subsection (c) by the duly elected 
tribal council of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mis-
sion Indians, the Secretary of the Interior shall pub-
lish in the Federal Register—
(A) a legal description of the boundary 
lines; and 
(B) legal description of the lands trans-
ferred under subsection (a).
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth
Street in Ogden, Utah, shall be known and designated as
the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be
a reference to the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on January 1, 2003.
Passed the House of Representatives November 15
(legislative day, November 14), 2002.
Attest:
Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5611
AN ACT
To designate the Federal building located at 324
Twenty-Fifth Street in Ogden, Utah, as the
‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5613
To establish a demonstration project to implement evidence-based preventive-
screening methods to detect mental illness and suicidal tendencies in
school-age youth at selected facilities.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To establish a demonstration project to implement evidence-
based preventive-screening methods to detect mental ill-
ness and suicidal tendencies in school-age youth at se-
lected facilities.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Mental
Health Screening and Prevention Act of 2002’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds as follows:
I 
107TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5614
To prohibit fraudulent, manipulative, or deceptive acts in electric and natural 
gas markets, to provide for audit trails and transparency in those mar-
kets, to increase penalties for illegal acts under the Federal Power 
Act and Natural Gas Act, to reexamine certain exemptions under the 
Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 
1935, to expand the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commis-
sion to order refunds of unjust and discriminatory rates, and for other 
purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. 
BROWN of Ohio, Mr. GORDON, Mr. RUSH, Mr. HONDA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 
INSLEE, Ms. DELAURO, and Ms. KILPATRICK) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To prohibit fraudulent, manipulative, or deceptive acts in 
electric and natural gas markets, to provide for audit 
trails and transparency in those markets, to increase 
penalties for illegal acts under the Federal Power Act 
and Natural Gas Act, to reexamine certain exemptions 
under the Federal Power Act and the Public Utility 
Holding Company Act of 1935, to expand the authority 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order 
refunds of unjust and discriminatory rates, and for other 
purposes.
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5615
To direct the Administrator of General Services to convey to Fresno County,
California, the existing Federal courthouse in that county.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mr. DOOLEY of California (for himself and Mr. RADANOVICH) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure
A BILL
To direct the Administrator of General Services to convey
to Fresno County, California, the existing Federal court-
house in that county.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO FRESNO COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.
On completion of a new Federal courthouse in Fres-
no, California, the Administrator of General Services shall
convey to Fresno County, California, without consider-
ation, the existing Federal courthouse in that county.
Æ
I 
107TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5617
To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a study of the effectiveness 
of the silver-based biocides as an alternative treatment to preserve wood. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
committee concerned 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a study 
of the effectiveness of the silver-based biocides as an 
alternative treatment to preserve wood.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wood Preservation 
Safety Act of 2002’’.
SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE STUDY ON EFFEC-
TIVENESS OF SILVER-BASED BIOCIDES AS 
WOOD PRESERVATION TREATMENT. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Environmental Protection Agency, the 
chemical industry, and the home improvement indus-
try have negotiated a voluntary agreement to phase 
out the use of arsenic-based preservatives in pres-
sure treated wood by December 31, 2003. 
(2) In order to maintain the wood treatment in-
dustry in the United States, a suitable, safe alter-
native to arsenic-based preservatives must be pro-
duced. 
(3) Silver has great potential as a viable, safe, 
and cost-effective alternative as a wood preservative. 
(4) Silver has been used since ancient times as 
a treatment to prevent the spread of bacteria, and 
silver-based biocides are used today in a wide range 
of applications. 
(5) As of 2001, silver was commercially pro-
duced in 12 States (Alaska, Arizona, California, Col-
orado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mex-
ico, South Dakota, Utah, and Washington), and sil-
ver remains a readily available mineral.
(6) The properties of silver biocide need to be 
further studied to determine the effectiveness of its 
use as a wood preservative. 
(b) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Agri-
culture shall direct the Forest Products Laboratory in 
Madison, Wisconsin, to conduct a study during fiscal years 
2003 and 2004 regarding the effectiveness of silver-based 
biocides as a wood preservation treatment. 
(c) FUNDING SOURCE.—To provide funds for the 
study, the Secretary of the Interior shall return to the Sec-
retary of Agriculture $8,000,000 of the funds that were 
transferred by the Secretary of Agriculture to the Sec-
retary of the Interior pursuant to section 2507 of the 
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public 
Law 107–171; 116 Stat. 275; 43 U.S.C. 2211 note) and 
remain unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5618
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve procedures for
the processing of visas for ‘‘O’’ and ‘‘P’’ nonimmigrant artists.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Ms. HART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve
procedures for the processing of visas for ‘‘O’’ and ‘‘P’’
nonimmigrant artists.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. IMPROVED PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING
VISAS FOR ‘‘O’’ AND ‘‘P’’ NONIMMIGRANT ART-
ISTS.
Section 214(c)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(6)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (D)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ immediately after
‘‘(D)’’; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(ii) In the case of petitions described in subpara-
graph (A), with respect to nonimmigrant artists and de-
scribed in section 101(a)(15)(P)(ii), the Attorney General
shall adjudicate such petition in not later than 30 days
after (A) the date the petitioner submits the petition with
a written advisory opinion, letter of no objection, or re-
quest for a waiver, or (B) the date the 15-day period has
expired and the petitioner has had an opportunity, where
appropriate, to supply rebuttal evidence.
‘‘(iii) If a petition described in subparagraph (D)(ii)
is not adjudicated within the 30-day period described in
clause (ii) and if the petitioner is a qualified nonprofit or-
ganization, or an individual or entity petitioning help pri-
marily on behalf of a qualified nonprofit organization, the
Attorney General shall adjudicate such a petition by the
premium-processing service, described in section 286(u),
without fee.’’; and
(2) by amending subparagraph (E)(i) to read as
follows:
‘‘(E)(i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (D), the At-
torney General shall implement expedited adjudication
procedures in the case of any petitions described in sub-
paragraph (A) with respect to nonimmigrant artists and
described in section 101(a)(15)(P)(ii) based upon any of
the following: possible severe financial loss to an organiza-
tion or individual, an extreme emergency situation, an ex-
treme humanitarian situation, the petitioning organiza-
tion’s nonprofit status in furthering the cultural and social
interests of the United States, a situation of national in-
terest or defense as requested by a government entity,
service errors, or any other compelling interest of the Serv-
ice. Such expedited adjudication procedures shall be avail-
able to a qualified nonprofit organization or an individual
or entity petitioning primarily on behalf of a qualified non-
profit organization.’’.
Æ
appropriated under subsection (a) shall be made in accord-
ance with the terms and conditions of the Stipulation for
Recommendation of Settlement dated May 22, 2000, en-
tered into between the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada and
the United States (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Stipula-
tion for Recommendation of Settlement’’) and included in
the report of the Chief Judge of the United States Court
of Federal Claims regarding Congressional Reference No.
94–1037X submitted to the Senate on January 4, 2001,
pursuant to the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of
title 28, United States Code.
(c) FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment
made under subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of
all claims of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada against
the United States referred to or described in the Stipula-
tion for Recommendation of Settlement.
(d) NONAPPLICABILITY.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use
or Distribution Act (25 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) shall not
apply to the payment appropriated under subsection (a).
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5620
For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for settlement of certain
claims against the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for
settlement of certain claims against the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS.
(a) AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT.—Subject to sub-
section (b), the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to the
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada, notwithstanding any
other provision of law, $1,830,000 from amounts appro-
priated under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.
(b) PAYMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION
FOR RECOMMENDATION OF SETTLEMENT.—The payment
TITLE I—FOREIGN PRIVATE AND 
PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKET AC-
CESS BARRIERS 
SEC. 101. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 301(d) OF THE TRADE 
ACT OF 1974. 
(a) UNJUSTIFIABLE ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRAC-
TICES.—Section 301(d)(4)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2411(d)(4)(A)) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(4)(A) An act, policy, or practice is unjustifi-
able if the act, policy, or practice—
‘‘(i) is in violation of, or inconsistent with, 
the international legal rights of the United 
States; or 
‘‘(ii) constitutes fostering by a foreign gov-
ernment of systematic anticompetitive activities 
by persons or among persons in one or more 
foreign countries that have the effect of re-
stricting, on a basis that is inconsistent with 
commercial considerations, access of United 
States goods or services to a foreign market or 
diverting foreign goods or services toward the 
United States market.’’. 
(b) UNREASONABLE ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRAC-
TICES.—Section 301(d)(3)(B)(i)(IV) of the Trade Act of
‘‘(h) MEMBERSHIP
AND ACTIVITIES
OF INSURED
STATE-CHARTERED CREDIT UNIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of
the enactment of the Federal Credit Union Services
Expansion Act of 2002, a State chartered insured
credit union may not—
‘‘(A) include within the membership of the
credit union any person or organization that is
not permissible for Federal credit unions; or
‘‘(B) exercise any asset powers of a type,
or in an amount, not authorized for Federal
credit unions, nor engage in any type of activ-
ity, or in any activity in any amount, that is not
permissible for Federal credit unions unless the
Board has determined that—
‘‘(i) the asset power or activity would
pose no significant risk to the Fund;
‘‘(ii) the asset power or activity is
consistent with the mission and purpose of
Federal credit unions, as defined in title I
of this Act, and is consistent with all pow-
ers and limitations conferred and imposed
on Federal credit unions under title I of
this Act; and
‘‘(iii) the State chartered insured
credit union is and continues to be in com-
pliance with applicable capital standards as
prescribed pursuant to section 216 of this
Act.
‘‘(2) CONTINUED RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.—
No provision of paragraph (1) shall be construed as
restricting or limiting in any way the general rule-
making authority of the Board.’’.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5624
To provide that Federal funds for the relief and revitalization of New York
City after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack shall not be subject
to Federal taxation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr.
ENGEL, and Mr. TOWNS) introduced the following bill; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To provide that Federal funds for the relief and revitalization
of New York City after the September 11, 2001, terrorist
attack shall not be subject to Federal taxation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘September 11th Assist-
ance Tax Clarification Act’’.
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL TAXATION FOR CER-
TAIN AMOUNTS RECEIVED FOR THE RELIEF
AND REVITALIZATION OF NEW YORK CITY
AFTER THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TERRORIST
ATTACK.
(a) IN GENERAL.—No amount shall be includible in
gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
which is paid (from funds referred to in subsection (b))
to any person as assistance on account of any property
or business damaged by, and for economic revitalization
directly related to, the terrorist attacks on the United
States that occurred on September 11, 2001.
(b) FUNDS.—The funds referred to in this subsection
are amounts appropriated by—
(1) Public Law 107–206 under the heading
‘‘DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, Community Planning and Devel-
opment’’, and
(2) section 434 of the Departments of Veterans
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002
(Public Law 107–73).
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to
taxable years ending after September 11, 2001.
Æ
‘‘SEC. 1032. TRANSACTIONS BY A CORPORATION WITH RE-
SPECT TO ITS STOCK.
‘‘(a) NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS.—No gain
or loss shall be recognized to a corporation on the receipt
of property (including money) or services in exchange for
stock of such corporation.
‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS.—
‘‘(1) NONRECOGNITION TREATMENT.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in
paragraph (2), section 1032 derivative items of
a corporation shall not be taken into account in
determining such corporation’s liability for tax
under this subtitle.
‘‘(B) SECTION 1032 DERIVATIVE ITEMS.—
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term
‘section 1032 derivative item’ means any item
of income, gain, loss, or deduction if—
‘‘(i) such item arises out of the rights
or obligations under any option or forward
or futures contract to the extent such op-
tion or contract relates to the corporation’s
stock (or is attributable to any transfer or
extinguishment of any such right or obliga-
tion), or
‘‘(ii) such item arises under any other
contract or position but only to the extent
I
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 5627
To establish a counter-cyclical income support program for dairy producers.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 10, 2002
Mr. OBEY (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To establish a counter-cyclical income support program for
dairy producers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Dairy Farmer
and Rural Community Rescue Act of 2002’’.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) BOARD.—The term ‘‘Board’’ means a Re-
gional Supply Management Board.
(2) CLASS I, II, III, AND IV MILK.—The terms
‘‘Class I milk’’, ‘‘Class II milk’’, ‘‘Class III milk’’,
and ‘‘Class IV milk’’ mean milk classified as Class
I, II, III, or IV milk, respectively, under an order.
(3) DISTRICT.—The term ‘‘District’’ means a
Regional Supply Management District.
(4) ELIGIBLE PRODUCER.—The term ‘‘eligible
producer’’ means an individual or entity that directly
or indirectly has an interest in the production of
milk.
(5) ELIGIBLE PRODUCTION.—The term ‘‘eligi-
ble production’’ means the lesser of—
(A) the quantity of milk produced by an el-
igible producer during a month; or
(B) 230,000 pounds per month.
(6) MARKETING AREA.—The term ‘‘marketing
area’’ means a marketing area subject to an order.
(7) ORDER.—The term ‘‘order’’ means—
(A) an order issued under section 8c of the
Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c),
reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937; or
(B) a comparable State order, as deter-
mined by the Secretary.
(8) PARTICIPATING STATE.—The term ‘‘partici-
pating State’’ means a State that is participating in
the program authorized by section 3.
thereby denied the mechanism for expression of their
inherent sovereignty through self-government and
self-determination, their lands and ocean resources.
‘‘(17) Through the Newlands Resolution and
the 1900 Organic Act, the Congress received
1,750,000 acres of lands formerly owned by the
Crown and Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom
and exempted the lands from then existing public
land laws of the United States by mandating that
the revenue and proceeds from these lands be ‘used
solely for the benefit of the inhabitants of the Ha-
waiian Islands for education and other public pur-
poses’, thereby establishing a special trust relation-
ship between the United States and the inhabitants
of Hawaii.
‘‘(18) In 1921, Congress enacted the Hawaiian
Homes Commission Act, 1920, which designated
200,000 acres of the ceded public lands for exclusive
homesteading by Native Hawaiians, thereby affirm-
ing the trust relationship between the United States
and the Native Hawaiians, as expressed by then Sec-
retary of the Interior Franklin K. Lane who was
cited in the Committee Report of the Committee on
Territories of the House of Representatives as stat-
ing, ‘One thing that impressed me . . . was the fact
eral income tax return for a taxable year, in-
cluding such returns of all of its affiliates, part-
ners, and parent firms. 
‘‘(B) EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION.—An 
applicant shall pay the higher fees established 
by the Secretary each year unless the applicant 
submits evidence that it qualifies for the lower 
fee rate. The applicant shall support its claim 
that it meets the definition under subparagraph 
(A) by submission of a copy of its most recent 
Federal income tax return for a taxable year, 
and a copy of such returns of its affiliates, 
partners, and parent firms, which show an 
amount of gross sales or receipts that is less 
than the maximum established in subparagraph 
(A). The applicant, and each of such affiliates, 
partners, and parent firms, shall certify that 
the information provided is a true and accurate 
copy of the actual tax forms they submitted to 
the Internal Revenue Service. If no tax forms 
are submitted for affiliates, partners, or parent 
firms, the applicant shall certify that the appli-
cant has no affiliates, partners, or parent firms, 
respectively. 
‘‘(C) REDUCED FEES.—