datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3615 
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to monitor compli-
ance with the requirements of the American Rescue Plan relating to 
the uses of funds for child care. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 28, 2021 
Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS (for herself and Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 
A BILL 
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
to monitor compliance with the requirements of the 
American Rescue Plan relating to the uses of funds 
for child care. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Funds Ac-
countability Act’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:38 Jun 24, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3615.IH
H3615
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRE-
MENTS OF THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 
RELATING TO THE USES OF FUNDS FOR 
CHILD CARE STABILIZATION GRANTS AND 
THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 
GRANT PROGRAM. 
Section 2201 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 
2021 (Public Law 117–2; March 11, 2021) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(d) MONITORING COMPLIANCE.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall dedi-
cate such portion of the amounts made available by 
subsection (b) for Federal administrative costs in 
carrying out this section as the Secretary determines 
necessary to monitor compliance with the require-
ments relating to all uses of funds made available 
under section 2202 for stabilization grants and 
under this section for the child care and develop-
ment block grant program to ensure the integrity of 
the program, including— 
‘‘(A) compliance with the requirements 
under subsection (c) and under section 2202(f), 
and 
‘‘(B) to ensure that there is no duplication 
with loans under the Paycheck Protection Pro-
gram received by child care providers. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:22 Jul 08, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3615.IH
H3615
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 
January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall make publicly 
available and provide to the Committee on Finance 
and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on 
Education and Labor and the Committee on Ways 
and Means of the House of Representatives a report 
summarizing the findings of compliance reviews 
under this section.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:38 Jun 24, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3615.IH
H3615
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3616 
AN ACT 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 
study to assess the suitability and feasibility of desig-
nating certain land as the Bear River National Heritage 
Area, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bear River National 
Heritage Area Study Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) HERITAGE
AREA.—The term ‘‘Heritage 
Area’’ means the Bear River National Heritage 
Area. 
(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of the Interior. 
(3) STATES.—The term ‘‘States’’ means the 
States of Utah and Idaho. 
(4) STUDY
AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 
means— 
(A) areas in the States that are within the 
main drainage area of the Bear River; 
(B) all of Cache, Box Elder, and Rich 
Counties in the State of Utah, and Bear Lake, 
Caribou, Franklin, and Oneida Counties in the 
State of Idaho; 
(C) the following communities in Utah: 
Bear River, Brigham City, Corinne, Deweyville, 
Elwood, Fielding, Garland, Honeyville, Howell, 
Mantua, Perry, Plymouth, Portage, Snowville, 
Tremonton, Willard, Amalga, Clarkston, Cor-
nish, Hyde Park, Hyrum, Lewiston, Logan,
Mendon, 
Millville, 
Newton, 
Nibley, 
North 
Logan, Paradise, Providence, Richmond, River 
Heights, Smithfield, Trenton, Wellsville, Garden 
City, Laketown, Randolph, and Woodruff; 
(D) the following communities in Idaho: 
Malad, Clifton, Dayton, Franklin, Preston, Ox-
ford, Weston, Bancroft, Soda Springs, Grace, 
Bloomington, Paris, Georgetown, Montpelier, 
and St. Charles; and 
(E) any other areas in the States that— 
(i) have heritage aspects that are 
similar to the areas described in subpara-
graphs (A), (B), (C), or (D); and 
(ii) are adjacent to, or in the vicinity 
of, those areas. 
SEC. 3. STUDY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation 
with State and local organizations and governmental agen-
cies, Tribal governments, non-profit organizations, and 
other appropriate entities, shall conduct a study to assess 
the suitability and feasibility of designating the study area 
as a National Heritage Area, to be known as the ‘‘Bear 
River National Heritage Area’’.
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study shall include anal-
ysis, documentation, and determinations on whether the 
study area— 
(1) has an assemblage of natural, historic, and 
cultural resources that— 
(A) represent distinctive aspects of the 
people and cultures of the United States; 
(B) are worthy of recognition, conserva-
tion, interpretation, and continuing use; and 
(C) would be best managed— 
(i) through partnerships among public 
and private entities; and 
(ii) by linking diverse and sometimes 
noncontiguous resources and active com-
munities; 
(2) reflects traditions, customs, beliefs, and 
folklife that are a valuable part of the story of the 
United States; 
(3) provides outstanding opportunities— 
(A) to conserve natural, historic, cultural, 
or scenic features; and 
(B) for recreation and education; 
(4) contains resources that— 
(A) are important to any identified themes 
of the study area; and
117TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 3617 
AN ACT 
To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to pro-
vide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely 
impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for 
expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and 
for other purposes.
(B) retain a degree of integrity capable of 
supporting interpretation; 
(5) includes residents, business interests, non- 
profit organizations, and State, local, and Tribal 
governments, and other appropriate entities that— 
(A) are involved in the planning of the 
Heritage Area; 
(B) have developed a conceptual financial 
plan that outlines the roles of all participants in 
the Heritage Area, including the Federal Gov-
ernment; and 
(C) have demonstrated support for the des-
ignation of the Heritage Area; 
(6) has a potential management entity to work 
in partnership with the individuals and entities de-
scribed in paragraph (5) to develop the Heritage 
Area while encouraging State and local economic ac-
tivity; 
(7) could impact the rights of private property 
owners with respect to their private property; and 
(8) has a conceptual boundary map that is sup-
ported by the public. 
SEC. 4. REPORT. 
Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available to carry out this Act, the Sec-
retary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Re-
sources of the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 
a report that describes— 
(1) the findings of the study under section 3; 
and 
(2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 
Secretary. 
Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 
2021. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 3616 
AN ACT 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to con-
duct a study to assess the suitability and feasi-
bility of designating certain land as the Bear 
River National Heritage Area, and for other pur-
poses.
IB 
Union Calendar No. 120 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3616 
[Report No. 117–165] 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess 
the suitability and feasibility of designating certain land as the Bear 
River National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 28, 2021 
Mr. MOORE of Utah (for himself and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 
NOVEMBER 1, 2021 
Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 
printed 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:51 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H3616.RH
H3616
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 
study to assess the suitability and feasibility of desig-
nating certain land as the Bear River National Heritage 
Area, and for other purposes. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:51 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H3616.RH
H3616
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bear River National 
Heritage Area Study Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) HERITAGE
AREA.—The term ‘‘Heritage 
Area’’ means the Bear River National Heritage 
Area. 
(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of the Interior. 
(3) STATES.—The term ‘‘States’’ means the 
States of Utah and Idaho. 
(4) STUDY
AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 
means— 
(A) areas in the States that are within the 
main drainage area of the Bear River; 
(B) all of Cache, Box Elder, and Rich 
Counties in the State of Utah, and Bear Lake, 
Caribou, Franklin, and Oneida Counties in the 
State of Idaho; 
(C) the following communities in Utah: 
Bear River, Brigham City, Corinne, Deweyville, 
Elwood, Fielding, Garland, Honeyville, Howell, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:51 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3616.RH
H3616
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
‘‘(3) For any cannabis product removed during 
the calendar year after the calendar year to which 
paragraph (2) applies, 7 percent. 
‘‘(4) For any cannabis product removed during 
the calendar year after the calendar year to which 
paragraph (3) applies, 8 percent. 
‘‘(c) APPLICABLE EQUIVALENT AMOUNT.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 
(a)(2), the term ‘applicable equivalent amount’ 
means, with respect to any cannabis product re-
moved during any calendar year, an amount equal 
to— 
‘‘(A) in the case of any cannabis product 
not described in subparagraph (B), the product 
of the applicable rate per ounce multiplied by 
the number of ounces of such product (and a 
proportionate tax at the like rate on all frac-
tional parts of an ounce of such product), and 
‘‘(B) in the case of any THC-measurable 
cannabis product, the product of the applicable 
rate per gram multiplied by the number of 
grams of tetrahydrocannabinol in such product 
(and a proportionate tax at the like rate on all 
fractional 
parts 
of 
a 
gram 
of 
tetrahydrocannabinol in such product). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
06:18 Jul 03, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3617.IH
H3617
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
119TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4431
AN ACT 
To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 with respect 
to the definition of qualifying venture capital funds, and 
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
119TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4490
AN ACT 
To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act 
to extend privileges and immunities to certain additional 
international and regional organizations, and for other 
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
(Public Law 116–94) for crop losses in crop year 2020 
there are appropriated such sums as may be necessary. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
17:24 Jun 29, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3821.IH
H3821
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
satisfaction of the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services that such article is— 
‘‘(i) a drug— 
‘‘(I) that is approved under sec-
tion 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act or licensed under 
section 351 of the Public Health Serv-
ice Act, or 
‘‘(II) for which an investigational 
use exemption has been authorized 
under section 505(i) of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or 
under section 351(a) of the Public 
Health Service Act, or 
‘‘(ii) a combination product (as de-
scribed in section 503(g) of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), the con-
stituent parts of which were approved or 
cleared under section 505, 510(k), or 515 of 
such Act. 
‘‘(D) INDUSTRIAL HEMP.—The term ‘indus-
trial hemp’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. 
and any part of such plant, whether growing or 
not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol con-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
19:31 Mar 24, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H3617.RH
H3617
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
(10), and (14), respectively, and moving the para-
graphs so as to appear in numerical order; 
(8) by inserting after paragraph (8) (as so re-
designated) the following: 
‘‘(9) RECREATION
SERVICE
PROVIDER.—The 
term ‘recreation service provider’ means an indi-
vidual or entity that— 
‘‘(A) provides outfitting, guiding, or other 
recreation services; or 
‘‘(B) conducts recreational or competitive 
events, including incidental sales.’’; and 
(9) by inserting after paragraph (12) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(13) SPECIAL
RECREATION
PERMIT.—The 
term ‘special recreation permit’ means a permit 
issued by a Federal Land Management Agency for 
specialized individual or group uses of Federal rec-
reational lands and waters, including— 
‘‘(A) for outfitting, guiding, or other recre-
ation services; 
‘‘(B) for recreation or competitive events, 
which may include incidental sales; 
‘‘(C) for the use of— 
‘‘(i) a special area; or 
‘‘(ii) an area in which use is allocated; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
06:25 Jul 03, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3670.IH
H3670
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
208 
† HR 3684 EAS 
‘‘(G) a project to develop, establish, or 
maintain an integrated mobility management 
system, a transportation demand management 
system, or on-demand mobility services. 
‘‘(2) BUNDLING OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An eligible entity may 
bundle 2 or more similar eligible projects under 
the program that are— 
‘‘(i) included as a bundled project in a 
statewide transportation improvement pro-
gram under section 135; and 
‘‘(ii) awarded to a single contractor or 
consultant pursuant to a contract for engi-
neering and design or construction between 
the contractor and the eligible entity. 
‘‘(B) ITEMIZATION.—Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law (including regulations), a 
bundling of eligible projects under this para-
graph may be considered to be a single project, 
including for purposes of section 135. 
‘‘(f) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.—An eligible entity 
may use funds from a grant under the program for— 
‘‘(1) development phase activities, including 
planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, en-
(B) 
by 
redesignating 
subsections 
(j) 
through (n) as subsections (h) through (l), re-
spectively. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) Section 5 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 
2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a), in the second sen-
tence, by striking ‘‘and (r)’’ and inserting ‘‘and 
(q)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (d)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘sub-
section (k)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (i)’’; 
and 
(ii) in paragraph (10), by striking 
‘‘subsection (k) of this section’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘subsection (i)’’. 
(2) Section 6 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 
2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘sub-
section (o)’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘subsection (n)’’; 
(B) in subsection (f), in the third sentence, 
by striking ‘‘and financial resources’’; 
(C) in subsection (q) (as redesignated by 
subsection (a)(2)(B)), in paragraph (1)(B), by 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
17:25 Jun 29, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3822.IH
H3822
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3618 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain taxes 
and revenues. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 28, 2021 
Mrs. NAPOLITANO
(for herself, Mr. DAVID
SCOTT
of Georgia, Mr. 
GARAMENDI, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. SCHIFF) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Trans-
portation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use 
of certain taxes and revenues. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Gen-
eral Sales Tax Protection Act’’. 
SEC. 2. USE OF REVENUES. 
(a) WRITTEN ASSURANCES ON USE OF REVENUE.— 
Section 47107(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
06:00 Jul 08, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3618.IH
H3618
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
(1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by strik-
ing ‘‘local taxes’’ and inserting ‘‘local excise taxes’’; 
(2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘State tax’’ 
and inserting ‘‘State excise tax’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) This subsection does not apply to State or local 
general sales taxes nor to State or local generally applica-
ble sales taxes.’’. 
(b) RESTRICTION ON USE OF REVENUES.—Section 
47133 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Local taxes’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘Local excise taxes’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘local 
taxes’’ and inserting ‘‘local excise taxes’’; 
(3) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘State tax’’ 
and inserting ‘‘State excise tax’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(d) LIMITATION
ON APPLICABILITY.—This sub-
section does not apply to— 
‘‘(1) State or local general sales taxes; or 
‘‘(2) State or local generally applicable sales 
taxes.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
06:00 Jul 08, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3618.IH
H3618
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 361 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
penalty in the income tax rate brackets. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 19, 2021 
Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 
the marriage penalty in the income tax rate brackets. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Make Marriage Great 
Again Act of 2021’’. 
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN INCOME 
TAX RATE BRACKETS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subsection: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:08 Feb 07, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H361.IH
H361
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
‘‘(k) ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY.—In the 
case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 
2020— 
‘‘(1) in lieu of the table which would otherwise 
apply under subsection (a) or (j)(2)(A) for such tax-
able year, the table which applies under subsection 
(c) or (j)(2)(C), respectively, shall apply determined 
by substituting for each dollar amount contained 
therein a dollar amount which is twice such dollar 
amount (as otherwise in effect for such taxable 
year), 
‘‘(2) subsection (c) shall be applied without re-
gard to the phrase ‘who is not a married individual 
(as defined in section 7703)’, and 
‘‘(3) subsections (d) and (j)(2)(D) shall not 
apply.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2020. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:08 Feb 07, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H361.IH
H361
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3621 
To repeal the Alien Enemies Act, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 28, 2021 
Ms. OMAR (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. 
JAYAPAL, Ms. CHU, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. BLU-
MENAUER, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. BASS, Mr. 
ESPAILLAT, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. POCAN, Ms. MOORE of 
Wisconsin, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. 
JACOBS of California, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. COOPER, Ms. TLAIB, Mrs. 
NAPOLITANO, Ms. MENG, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. 
JONES, Ms. BUSH, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. GARCI´A 
of Illinois, Ms. NEWMAN, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. VELA´ZQUEZ, Mr. 
BOWMAN, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia, Ms. 
OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mrs. HAYES, and Ms. MATSUI) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To repeal the Alien Enemies Act, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neighbors Not En-
emies Act of 2021’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:40 Jun 24, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3621.IH
H3621
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ALIEN ENEMIES ACT. 
Sections 4067 through 4070 of the Revised Statutes 
of the United States (50 U.S.C. 21–24) are repealed. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:40 Jun 24, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3621.IH
H3621
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
455 
† HR 3684 EAS 
the Practice in Data Collection and Performance 
Measurement of Stormwater Best Management 
Practices’’; and 
(B) the 1997 report sponsored by the Ad-
ministrator entitled ‘‘Stormwater Best Manage-
ment Practices in an Ultra-Urban Setting: Se-
lection and Monitoring’’. 
(b) REISSUANCE.—Not later than 1 year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update 
and reissue each best management practices report to reflect 
new information and advancements in stormwater manage-
ment. 
(c) UPDATES.—Not less frequently than once every 5 
years after the date on which the Administrator reissues 
a best management practices report described in subsection 
(b), the Administrator shall update and reissue the best 
management practices report until the earlier of the date 
on which— 
(1) the best management practices report is with-
drawn; or 
(2) the contents of the best management practices 
report are incorporated (including by reference) into 
applicable regulations of the Administrator. 
SEC. 11522. INVASIVE PLANT ELIMINATION PROGRAM. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: