115 
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘facili-
ties’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘indus-
trial facilities’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 
subsections (c) and (d), respectively; 
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following 
new subsection (b): 
‘‘(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal 
year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of 
title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress 
a report identifying, for each of the armed forces (other than 
the Coast Guard) each of the following: 
‘‘(1) The core logistics capability requirements 
identified in subsection (a)(2). 
‘‘(2) The depot maintenance workloads required 
to cost-effectively support core logistics capability re-
quirements. 
‘‘(3) The additional depot maintenance work-
loads, beyond the workloads identified under para-
graph (2), needed to ensure that not more than 50 
percent of the non-exempt depot maintenance funding 
is expended for performance by non-federal govern-
mental personnel in accordance with section 2466 of 
this title. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
116 
‘‘(4) The allocation of workload for each Center 
of Industrial and Technical Excellence as designated 
in accordance with section 2474 of this title. 
‘‘(5) The depot maintenance capital investments 
required to be made in order to ensure compliance 
with subsection (a) by not later than four years after 
achieving initial operational capacity.’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(e) INDUSTRIAL FACILITY DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘industrial facility’ includes government-owned 
ammunition plants, arsenals, depots, and manufacturing 
plants and facilities designated for the purpose of con-
ducting depot-level maintenance and repair.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
section (a)(1) shall apply with respect to contracts entered 
into after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 323. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INDUSTRIAL FACILI-
TIES AS CENTERS OF INDUSTRIAL AND TECH-
NICAL EXCELLENCE. 
Section 2474(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting ‘‘or military industrial facility’’ after 
‘‘depot-level activity’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
117 
SEC. 324. REDESIGNATION OF CORE COMPETENCIES AS 
CORE LOGISTICS CAPABILITIES FOR CEN-
TERS OF INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNICAL EX-
CELLENCE. 
Section 2474 of title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed— 
(1) by striking ‘‘core competencies’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘core logistics capabilities’’; 
and 
(2) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘core com-
petency’’ and inserting ‘‘core logistics capability’’. 
SEC. 325. PERMANENT AND EXPANDED AUTHORITY FOR 
ARMY INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TO ENTER 
INTO 
CERTAIN 
COOPERATIVE 
ARRANGE-
MENTS WITH NON-ARMY ENTITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4544 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking the second sen-
tence; and 
(2) by striking subsection (k). 
(b) REPORT.—Section 328(b)(A) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 
110–181; 122 Stat. 66; 10 U.S.C. 4544 note) is amended 
by striking ‘‘the advisability’’ and all that follows through 
the end and inserting ‘‘the effect of the use of such authority 
on the rates charged by each Army industrial facility when 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
118 
bidding on contracts for the Army or for a Defense agency 
and providing recommendations to improve the ability of 
each category of Army industrial facility (as defined in sec-
tion 4544(j) of title 10, United States Code) to compete for 
such contracts;’’. 
SEC. 326. AMENDMENT TO REQUIREMENT RELATING TO 
CONSIDERATION 
OF 
COMPETITION 
THROUGHOUT 
OPERATION 
AND 
SUSTAINMENT OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 
Section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Re-
form Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by in-
serting after ‘‘major weapon system’’ the following: ‘‘or a 
subsystem or component of a major weapon system’’. 
SEC. 327. IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RE-
SULTING FROM CORROSION STUDY OF THE F- 
22 AND F-35 AIRCRAFT. 
(a) IMPLEMENTATION; CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.— 
Not later than January 31, 2012, the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall im-
plement the recommended actions described in subsection 
(b) and provide to the congressional defense committees a 
briefing on the actions taken by the Under Secretary to im-
plement such recommended actions. 
(b) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS.—The recommended ac-
tions described in this subsection are the following four rec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
119 
ommended actions included in the report of the Government 
Accountability Office report numbered GAO-11-117R and 
titled ‘‘Defense Management: DOD Needs to Monitor and 
Assess Corrective Actions Resulting from Its Corrosion 
Study of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter’’: 
(1) The documentation of program-specific rec-
ommendations made as a result of the corrosion study 
described in subsection (d) with regard to the F-35 
and F-22 aircraft and the establishment of a process 
for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the 
corrective actions taken with respect to such aircraft 
in response to such recommendations. 
(2) The documentation of program-specific rec-
ommendations made as a result of such corrosion 
study with regard to the other weapon systems identi-
fied in the study, specifically the CH-53K helicopter, 
the Joint High Speed Vessel, the Broad Area Mari-
time Surveillance Unmanned Aircraft System, and 
the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, and the establish-
ment of a process for monitoring and assessing the ef-
fectiveness of the corrosion prevention and control 
programs implemented for such weapons systems in 
response to such recommendations. 
(3) The documentation of Air Force-specific and 
Navy-specific recommendations made as a result of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
120 
such corrosion study and the establishment of a proc-
ess for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of 
the corrective actions taken by the Air Force and the 
Navy in response to such recommendations. 
(4) The documentation of Department of De-
fense-wide recommendations made as a result of such 
corrosion study, the implementation of any needed 
changes in policies and practices to improve corrosion 
prevention and control in new systems acquired by 
the Department, and the establishment of a process 
for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the 
corrective actions taken by the Department in re-
sponse to such recommendations. 
(c) DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE.—Not later than De-
cember 31, 2012, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acqui-
sition, Technology, and Logistics, in conjunction with the 
directors of the F-35 and F-22 program offices, the directors 
of the program offices for the weapons systems referred to 
in subsection (b)(2), the Secretary of the Army, the Sec-
retary of the Air Force, and the Secretary of the Navy, 
shall— 
(1) take whatever steps necessary to comply with 
the recommendations documented pursuant to the re-
quired implementation under subsection (a) of the 
recommended actions described in subsection (b); or 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
121 
(2) submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees written justification of why compliance was not 
feasible or achieved. 
(d) CORROSION STUDY.—The corrosion study de-
scribed in this subsection is the study required in House 
Report 111–166 accompanying H.R. 2647 of the 111th Con-
gress conducted by the Office of the Director of Corrosion 
Policy and Oversight of the Office of the Secretary of De-
fense and titled ‘‘Corrosion Evaluation of the F-22 Raptor 
and F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter’’. 
Subtitle D—Readiness 
SEC. 331. MODIFICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AU-
THORITY TO ACCEPT VOLUNTARY CONTRIBU-
TIONS OF FUNDS. 
The second sentence of subsection (g) of section 358 of 
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4201; 49 
U.S.C. 44718 note) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘shall be available’’ and inserting 
‘‘shall remain available until expended’’; and 
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ‘‘or to conduct studies of potential measures 
to mitigate such impacts’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
122 
SEC. 332. REVIEW OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES AFFECTING 
NAVIGABLE AIRSPACE. 
Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(e) REVIEW OF AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.—The Ad-
ministrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall 
develop procedures to allow the Department of Defense and 
the Department of Homeland Security to review and com-
ment on an aeronautical study conducted pursuant to sub-
section (b) prior to the completion of the study.’’. 
SEC. 333. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING INTEGRATION 
OF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TRAINING 
ACROSS AND BETWEEN COMBATANT COM-
MANDS AND MILITARY SERVICES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that ballistic missile 
defense is an inherently joint operation that requires close 
coordination between combatant commands and military 
services at all levels, from the strategic to the operational 
to the tactical. Since the time available to identify, track, 
and intercept ballistic missiles will be less than 30 minutes, 
joint training to improve the ability of the military depart-
ments and combatant commands to work together is essen-
tial for successfully planning and conducting ballistic mis-
sile defense operations. Congress has previously expressed 
concern that gaps in joint missile defense training, from 
the lowest sensor or shooter operator level to the highest lev-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
123 
els of decision-making on combatant command staffs, must 
be identified and rectified. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) improving the integration of ballistic missile 
defense training across and between combatant com-
mands and military services and fully identifying the 
training requirements, capabilities, and resources that 
the Department of Defense needs to effectively train 
for this complex mission is vital to the protection of 
the United States against ballistic missile attacks; 
(2) identifying and addressing training gaps in 
integrating missile defense training is essential for 
successfully employing the Ballistic Missile Defense 
System; and 
(3) identifying the capabilities and funding 
needed to effectively and adequately integrate training 
across and between the combatant commands and 
military services is important to ensure that training 
priorities are being met and that resources are 
aligned to support the training. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
124 
Subtitle E—Reports 
SEC. 341. ANNUAL CERTIFICATION AND MODIFICATIONS OF 
ANNUAL REPORT ON PREPOSITIONED MATE-
RIEL AND EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—Section 2229 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—(1) Not later than the 
date of the submission of the President’s budget request for 
a fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees certification in writing that the prepositioned stocks 
of each of the military departments meet all operations 
plans, in both fill and readiness, that are in effect as of 
the date of the submission of the certification. 
‘‘(2) If, for any year, the Secretary cannot certify that 
any of the prepositioned stocks meet such operations plans, 
the Secretary shall include with the certification for that 
year a list of the operations plans affected, a description 
of any measures that have been taken to mitigate any risk 
associated with prepositioned stock shortfalls, and an an-
ticipated timeframe for the replenishment of the stocks. 
‘‘(3) A certification under this subsection shall be in 
an unclassified form but may have a classified annex.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
125 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 2229a(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(7) A list of any non-standard items slated for 
inclusion in the prepositioned stocks and a plan for 
funding the inclusion and sustainment of such items. 
‘‘(8) A list of any equipment used in support of 
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or 
Operation Enduring Freedom slated for retrograde 
and subsequent inclusion in the prepositioned stocks. 
‘‘(9) An efficiency strategy for limited shelf-life 
medical stock replacement. 
‘‘(10) The status of efforts to develop a joint 
strategy, integrate service requirements, and eliminate 
redundancies. 
‘‘(11) The operational planning assumptions 
used in the formulation of prepositioned stock levels 
and composition. 
‘‘(12) A list of any strategic plans affected by 
changes to the levels, composition, or locations of the 
prepositioned stocks and a description of any action 
taken to mitigate any risk that such changes may cre-
ate.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
126 
SEC. 342. MODIFICATION OF REPORT ON MAINTENANCE 
AND REPAIR OF VESSELS IN FOREIGN SHIP-
YARDS. 
Section 7310(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting after ‘‘jus-
tification under law’’ the following: ‘‘and operational 
justification’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (4), by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(C) A vessel not described in subparagraph (A) 
or (B) that is operated pursuant to a contract entered 
into by the Military Sealift Command, the Maritime 
Administration, or the United States Transportation 
Command.’’. 
SEC. 343. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL RE-
PORT ON MILITARY WORKING DOGS. 
Section 358(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 
417; 122 Stat. 4427; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking ‘‘for the fiscal year covered by the report’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The number’’ 
and inserting ‘‘For the fiscal year covered by the re-
port, the number’’; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
127 
(3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The cost’’ and 
inserting ‘‘For such fiscal year’’; 
(4) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘during such 
fiscal year’’ before the period at the end; and 
(5) by adding at the end the following new para-
graphs: 
‘‘(4) For such fiscal year, the number of military 
working dogs providing services under a contract for 
each military department or Defense Agency. 
‘‘(5) For such fiscal year, the number of military 
working dogs bred by each military department or 
Defense Agency. 
‘‘(6) An evaluation of military working dog 
breeding programs that addresses— 
‘‘(A) the cost of acquiring dogs through such 
breeding programs compared to the cost of pur-
chasing the dogs; 
‘‘(B) a plan for how the Department could 
better leverage existing departmental and non-de-
partmental domestic breeding programs; and 
‘‘(C) other considerations as determined ap-
propriate by the Secretary. 
‘‘(7) The future force structure requirements for 
the military working dog program.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
128 
SEC. 344. ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 
REGARDING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE 
WITH JOINT MILITARY TRAINING AND FORCE 
ALLOCATIONS. 
(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—At the beginning of 
each even-numbered year, the Secretary of Defense shall 
conduct an assessment of joint military training and force 
allocations to determine— 
(1) the compliance of the military departments 
with the joint training, doctrine, and resource alloca-
tion recommendations promulgated by the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff; and 
(2) the effectiveness of the Joint Staff in carrying 
out the missions of planning and experimentation for-
merly accomplished by Joint Forces Command. 
(b) RELATION TO NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY AS-
SESSMENTS.—The assessments required by this section are 
in addition to the assessments of the National Military 
Strategy conducted by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
Staff under section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code. 
(c) REPORTS
ON RESULTS
OF ASSESSMENT.—Not 
later than March 31, 2012, and March 31 of each even- 
numbered year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report con-
taining the results of the most recently concluded assessment 
conducted under subsection (a). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
129 
SEC. 345. STUDY OF UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND 
TRAINING READINESS. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—In fulfillment of the rec-
ommendations in the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, 
the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Com-
mander of the United States Pacific Command, shall con-
duct a study to identify current and future training re-
quirements for all members of the Armed Forces assigned 
to the Pacific Command area of responsibility, the suffi-
ciency of current training infrastructure to meet those re-
quirements, and the effect on operational readiness of pro-
viding additional training venues. 
(b) TRAINING LOCATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the study re-
quired under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 
and the Commander of the United States Pacific 
Command shall identify locations within the United 
States Pacific Command’s area of responsibility as 
suitable to establish combat training centers to fulfill 
requirements for live-fire and simulated individual, 
small-unit, and collective pre-deployment and post-de-
ployment training of United States combat forces in 
joint, multi-national, and coalition full-spectrum op-
erations as well as counterinsurgency, stability, and 
humanitarian operations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
130 
(2) SUITABILITY FOR TRAINING.—The locations 
identified by the Secretary and the Commander of the 
United States Pacific Command pursuant to para-
graph (1) shall be suitable for training forces equiva-
lent to a Marine Expeditionary Force, an Army divi-
sion, an Air and Space Expeditionary Force, or a 
Navy carrier strike group. 
(3) LOCATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION.—In identi-
fying locations to be studied pursuant to paragraph 
(1), the Secretary and the Commander of the United 
States Pacific Command may consider, among others, 
current as well as former United States military in-
stallations. 
(c) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out the 
study required under subsection (a), the Secretary and the 
Commander of the United States Pacific Command shall— 
(1) determine cost estimates for any necessary 
acquisition, development (including military con-
struction), operation, and maintenance of the loca-
tions identified under subsection (b); 
(2) determine the estimated cost to upgrade any 
current infrastructure at any location identified to 
bring the location to a state required for the training 
described in subsection (b); 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
131 
(3) provide a description of the possible environ-
mental impact of conducting the training described in 
subsection (b); 
(4) include an estimate of the potential economic 
impact, either positive or negative, to the local com-
munity of accommodating the training described in 
subsection (b); and 
(5) provide a description of the anticipated im-
pact on the quality of life for military personnel who 
would train at the identified locations. 
(d) ASSESSMENT OF READINESS IMPACT.—The Sec-
retary and the Commander of the United States Pacific 
Command shall include in the study required under this 
section an assessment of the effect on operational and train-
ing readiness that would be achieved by providing training 
at the training locations identified under subsection (b). 
(e) REPORT.—Not later than February 28, 2013, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Armed Services of the Senate a report that contains the re-
sults of the study required under this section along with 
any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary and 
the Commander of the United States Pacific Command re-
garding the activation and implementation of training sites 
in the Pacific Command area of responsibility. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
132 
(f) COMPTROLLER GENERAL BRIEFING.—Not later 
than 120 days after the submittal of the report under sub-
section (e), the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed 
Services of the Senate a briefing on the completeness of the 
Secretary’s report in fulfilling the requirements of this sec-
tion and the feasibility of successfully establishing addi-
tional training opportunities based on the recommendations 
included in the report. 
Subtitle F—Limitations and 
Extensions of Authority 
SEC. 351. ADOPTION OF MILITARY WORKING DOG BY FAM-
ILY OF DECEASED OR SERIOUSLY WOUNDED 
MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO WAS 
THE DOG’S HANDLER. 
Section 2583(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Military animals’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(2) For purposes of making a determination under 
subsection (a)(2), unusual or extraordinary circumstances 
may include situations in which the handler of a military 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
133 
working dog is killed in action, dies of wounds received in 
action, or is so seriously wounded in action that the member 
will (or most likely will) receive a medical discharge. If the 
Secretary of the military department concerned determines 
that an adoption is justified in such a situation, the mili-
tary working dog shall be made available for adoption only 
by the immediate family of the member.’’. 
SEC. 352. PROHIBITION ON EXPANSION OF THE AIR FORCE 
FOOD TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE. 
The Secretary of the Air Force may not expand the 
Air Force food transformation initiative (hereinafter re-
ferred to as the ‘‘initiative’’) to include any base other than 
the six bases initially included in the pilot program until 
270 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air 
Force submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
Senate and House of Representatives a report on the initia-
tive. Such report shall include the following: 
(1) A description of the effects of the initiative 
on all employees who are paid through non-
appropriated funds. 
(2) A detailed plan for any new information 
technology systems, along with a funding plan, that 
may be required to fully implement the initiative. 
(3) A description of the performance metrics de-
veloped to objectively measure the initiative at the six 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
134 
bases participating in the initiative as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act. 
(4) An explanation of how appropriated and 
non-appropriated funds used in the initiative are 
being tracked to ensure that such funds remain seg-
regated. 
(5) An estimate of the cost savings and effi-
ciencies associated with the initiative, and an expla-
nation of how such savings are achieved. 
(6) The rationale for any increases in food prices 
at both the appropriated facilities on the military 
bases participating in the initiative as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act and the non-appropriated 
funded facilities on such bases. 
(7) An explanation of any challenges or barriers 
encountered at such bases and a plan for addressing 
those challenges or barriers to implementation. 
(8) A description of the training programs being 
developed to assist the transition for all employees af-
fected by the initiative. 
(9) A detailed plan for addressing any rec-
ommendations made by the Comptroller General of 
the United States following the Comptroller General’s 
review of the initiative. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
135 
SEC. 353. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION AND EXPENDITURE 
OF FUNDS FOR THE MIGRATION OF ARMY EN-
TERPRISE EMAIL SERVICES. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense 
for fiscal year 2012 for procurement or operation and 
maintenance for the migration to enterprise email services 
by the Department of the Army, not more than 2 percent 
may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days 
after the date on which the Secretary of Army submits to 
the congressional defense committees a report that includes 
a comparison of the relative merits of transitioning to De-
fense Information Systems Agency enterprise email services 
and Army Knowledge Online. The report shall address each 
of the following: 
(1) The original business case analysis sup-
porting the decision to transition to Defense Informa-
tion Systems Agency enterprise email services. 
(2) An analysis of alternatives to the decision 
that were considered. 
(3) The proposed formal acquisition oversight 
body and process with respect to the transition. 
(4) An economic analysis (including a life-cycle 
cost analysis) of the proposed transition, including a 
cost-benefit analysis and assessment of sustainment 
costs. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
136 
SEC. 354. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM FOR 
AVAILABILITY OF WORKING-CAPITAL FUNDS 
TO ARMY FOR CERTAIN PRODUCT IMPROVE-
MENTS. 
Section 330(f) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 
68) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ and inserting 
‘‘October 1, 2014’’. 
Subtitle G—Other Matters 
SEC. 
361. 
CONSIDERATION 
OF 
FORECLOSURE 
CIR-
CUMSTANCES IN ADJUDICATION OF SECU-
RITY CLEARANCES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 80 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1564a 
the following new section: 
‘‘§ 1564b. Security clearance adjudications 
‘‘In carrying out a security clearance adjudication of 
a member of the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense shall 
give special consideration to any such member with a 
record of a foreclosure on the credit report of such member.’’. 
(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall 
issue regulations to carry out section 1564b of title 10, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
469 
(C) maintain, modernize, or replace the de-
livery platforms for nuclear weapons; and 
(D) retire, dismantle, or eliminate any cov-
ered nuclear system. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required under 
paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) A detailed description of the plan to en-
hance the safety, security, and reliability of the 
nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States. 
(B) A detailed description of the plan to 
modernize the nuclear weapons complex, includ-
ing improving the safety of facilities, modern-
izing the infrastructure, and maintaining the 
key capabilities and competencies of the nuclear 
weapons workforce, including designers and tech-
nicians. 
(C) A detailed description of the plan to 
maintain, modernize, and replace delivery plat-
forms for nuclear weapons. 
(D) A detailed estimate of budget require-
ments, including the costs associated with the 
plans outlined under subparagraphs (A) through 
(C), over the 10-year period following the date of 
the report. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00469
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS