•HR 1058 EH1S
Sec. 1.
Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Prevention of lawyer-driven litigation.
(a) Plaintiff steering committees to ensure client control of lawsuits.
‘‘Sec. 36. Class action steering committees.
‘‘(a) Class action steering committee.
‘‘(b) Membership of plaintiff steering committee.
‘‘(c) Functions of plaintiff steering committee.
‘‘(d) Immunity from civil liability; removal.
‘‘(e) Effect on other law.’’
(b) Prohibition on attorneys’ fees paid from Commission disgorgement
funds.
Sec. 3. Prevention of abusive practices that foment litigation.
(a) Additional provisions applicable to private actions.
‘‘Sec. 20B. Procedures applicable to private actions.
‘‘(a) Elimination of bonus payments to named plaintiffs in class
actions.
‘‘(b) Restrictions on professional plaintiffs.
‘‘(c) Awards of fees and expenses.
‘‘(d) Prevention of abusive conflicts of interest.
‘‘(e) Disclosure of settlement terms to class members.
‘‘(f) Encouragement of finality in settlement discharges.
‘‘(g) Contribution from non-parties in interests of fairness.
‘‘(h) Defendant’s right to written interrogatories establishing
scienter.’’
(b) Prohibition of referral fees that foment litigation.
Sec. 4. Prevention of ‘‘fishing expedition’’ lawsuits.
‘‘Sec. 10A. Requirements for securities fraud actions.
‘‘(a) Scienter.
‘‘(b) Requirement for explicit pleading of scienter.
‘‘(c) Dismissal for failure to meet pleading requirements; stay of
discovery; summary judgment.
‘‘(d) Reliance and causation.
‘‘(e) Allocation of liability.
‘‘(f) Damages.’’
Sec. 5. Establishment of ‘‘safe harbor’’ for predictive statements.
‘‘Sec. 37. Application of safe harbor for forward-looking statements.
‘‘(a) Safe harbor in general.
‘‘(b) Definition of forward-looking statement.
‘‘(c) No duty to make continuing projections.
‘‘(d) Automatic procedure for staying discovery; expedited proce-
dure for consideration of motion on applicability of safe
harbor.
‘‘(e) Regulatory authority.’’
Sec. 6. Amendment to Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Sec. 7. Financial fraud detection and disclosure.
‘‘Sec. 13A. Fraud detection and disclosure.
‘‘(a) Audit requirements.
‘‘(b) Required response to audit discoveries.
‘‘(c) Auditor liability limitation.
‘‘(d) Civil penalties in cease-and-desist proceedings.
‘‘(e) Preservation of existing authority.
‘‘(f) Definitions.’’
Sec. 8. Rule of construction.
Sec. 9. Effective date.
•HR 1058 EH1S
SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF LAWYER-DRIVEN LITIGATION.
(a) PLAINTIFF STEERING COMMITTEES TO ENSURE
CLIENT CONTROL
OF LAWSUITS.—The Securities Ex-
change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is amended
by adding at the end the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 36. CLASS ACTION STEERING COMMITTEES.
‘‘(a) CLASS ACTION STEERING COMMITTEE.—In any
private action arising under this title seeking to recover
damages on behalf of a class, the court shall, at the earli-
est practicable time, appoint a committee of class members
to direct counsel for the class (hereafter in this section
referred to as the ‘plaintiff steering committee’) and to
perform such other functions as the court may specify.
Court appointment of a plaintiff steering committee shall
not be subject to interlocutory review.
‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP OF PLAINTIFF STEERING COM-
MITTEE.—
‘‘(1) QUALIFICATIONS.—
‘‘(A) NUMBER.—A plaintiff steering com-
mittee shall consist of not fewer than 5 class
members, willing to serve, who the court be-
lieves will fairly represent the class.
‘‘(B) OWNERSHIP
INTERESTS.—Members
of the plaintiff steering committee shall have
cumulatively held during the class period not
less than—
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(i) the lesser of 5 percent of the se-
curities which are the subject matter of the
litigation or $10,000,000 in market value
of the securities which are the subject mat-
ter of the litigation; or
‘‘(ii) such smaller percentage or dollar
amount as the court finds appropriate
under the circumstances.
‘‘(2) 
NAMED
PLAINTIFFS.—Class 
plaintiffs
serving as the representative parties in the litigation
may serve on the plaintiff steering committee, but
shall not comprise a majority of the committee.
‘‘(3) NONCOMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—Mem-
bers of the plaintiff steering committee shall serve
without compensation, except that any member may
apply to the court for reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses from any common fund es-
tablished for the class.
‘‘(4) MEETINGS.—The plaintiff steering com-
mittee shall conduct its business at one or more pre-
viously scheduled meetings of the committee, of
which prior notice shall have been given and at
which a majority of its members are present in per-
son or by electronic communication. The plaintiff
steering committee shall decide all matters within its
•HR 1058 EH1S
authority by a majority vote of all members, except
that the committee may determine that decisions
other than to accept or reject a settlement offer or
to employ or dismiss counsel for the class may be
delegated to one or more members of the committee,
or may be voted upon by committee members seria-
tim, without a meeting.
‘‘(5) RIGHT OF NONMEMBERS TO BE HEARD.—
A class member who is not a member of the plaintiff
steering committee may appear and be heard by the
court on any issue relating to the organization or ac-
tions of the plaintiff steering committee.
‘‘(c) FUNCTIONS OF PLAINTIFF STEERING COMMIT-
TEE.—The authority of the plaintiff steering committee
to direct counsel for the class shall include all powers nor-
mally permitted to an attorney’s client in litigation, includ-
ing the authority to retain or dismiss counsel and to reject
offers of settlement, and the authority to accept an offer
of settlement subject to final approval by the court. Dis-
missal of counsel other than for cause shall not limit the
ability of counsel to enforce any contractual fee agreement
or to apply to the court for a fee award from any common
fund established for the class.
‘‘(d) IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL LIABILITY; REMOVAL.—
Any person serving as a member of a plaintiff steering
•HR 1058 EH1S
committee shall be immune from any civil liability for any
negligence in performing such service, but shall not be im-
mune from liability for intentional misconduct or from the
assessment of costs pursuant to section 20B(c). The court
may remove a member of a plaintiff steering committee
for good cause shown.
‘‘(e) EFFECT ON OTHER LAW.—This section does not
affect any other provision of law concerning class actions
or the authority of the court to give final approval to any
offer of settlement.’’.
(b) PROHIBITION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES PAID FROM
COMMISSION DISGORGEMENT FUNDS.—Section 21(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u(d))
is amended by adding at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(4) PROHIBITION
ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES PAID
FROM COMMISSION DISGORGEMENT FUNDS.—Except as
otherwise ordered by the court, funds disgorged as the re-
sult of an action brought by the Commission, or of any
Commission proceeding, shall not be distributed as pay-
ment for attorneys’ fees or expenses incurred by private
parties seeking distribution of the disgorged funds.’’.
•HR 1058 EH1S
SEC. 3. PREVENTION OF ABUSIVE PRACTICES THAT FO-
MENT LITIGATION.
(a) ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PRI-
VATE ACTIONS.—The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
amended by inserting after section 20A (15 U.S.C. 78t–
1) the following new section:
‘‘PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO PRIVATE ACTIONS
‘‘SEC. 20B. (a) ELIMINATION OF BONUS PAYMENTS
TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS IN CLASS ACTIONS.—In any pri-
vate action under this title that is certified as a class ac-
tion pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
portion of any final judgment or of any settlement that
is awarded to class plaintiffs serving as the representative
parties shall be equal, on a per share basis, to the portion
of the final judgment or settlement awarded to all other
members of the class. Nothing in this subsection shall be
construed to limit the award to any representative parties
of actual expenses (including lost wages) relating to the
representation of the class.
‘‘(b) RESTRICTIONS
ON
PROFESSIONAL
PLAIN-
TIFFS.—Except as the court may otherwise permit for
good cause, a person may be a named plaintiff, or an offi-
cer, director, or fiduciary of a named plaintiff, in no more
than 5 class actions filed during any 3-year period.
‘‘(c) AWARDS OF FEES AND EXPENSES.—
•HR 1058 EH1S
the extent that the prevailing party during the
course of the proceedings engaged in conduct
that unduly and unreasonably protracted the
final resolution of the action.
‘‘(5) AWARDS IN DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS.—
In adjudicating any motion for an order compelling
discovery or any motion for a protective order made
in any private action arising under this title, the
court shall award the prevailing party reasonable
fees and other expenses incurred by the party in
bringing or defending against the motion, including
reasonable attorneys’ fees, unless the court finds
that special circumstances make an award unjust.
‘‘(6) RULE
OF
CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in
this subsection shall be construed to limit or impair
the discretion of the court to award costs pursuant
to other provisions of law.
‘‘(7) PROTECTION
AGAINST
ABUSE
OF
PROC-
ESS.—In any action to which this subsection applies,
a court shall not permit a plaintiff to withdraw from
or voluntarily dismiss such action if the court deter-
mines that such withdrawal or dismissal is taken for
purposes of evasion of the requirements of this sub-
section.
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(8) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub-
section—
‘‘(A) The term ‘fees and other expenses’
includes the reasonable expenses of expert wit-
nesses, the reasonable cost of any study, analy-
sis, report, test, or project which is found by
the court to be necessary for the preparation of
the party’s case, and reasonable attorneys’ fees
and expenses. The amount of fees awarded
under this section shall be based upon prevail-
ing market rates for the kind and quality of
services furnished.
‘‘(B) The term ‘substantially justified’
shall have the same meaning as in section
2412(d)(1) of title 28, United States Code.
‘‘(d) PREVENTION OF ABUSIVE CONFLICTS OF IN-
TEREST.—In any private action under this title pursuant
to a complaint seeking damages on behalf of a class, if
the class is represented by an attorney who directly owns
or otherwise has a beneficial interest in the securities that
are the subject of the litigation, the court shall, on motion
by any party, make a determination of whether such inter-
est constitutes a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify
the attorney from representing the class.
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(e) DISCLOSURE OF SETTLEMENT TERMS TO CLASS
MEMBERS.—In any private action under this title that is
certified as a class action pursuant to the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, any proposed or final settlement agree-
ment that is published or otherwise disseminated to the
class shall include the following statements:
‘‘(1) STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL OUTCOME OF
CASE.—
‘‘(A) AGREEMENT ON AMOUNT OF DAM-
AGES AND LIKELIHOOD OF PREVAILING.—If the
settling parties agree on the amount of dam-
ages per share that would be recoverable if the
plaintiff prevailed on each claim alleged under
this title and the likelihood that the plaintiff
would prevail—
‘‘(i) 
a 
statement 
concerning 
the
amount of such potential damages per
share; and
‘‘(ii) a statement concerning the likeli-
hood that the plaintiff would prevail on the
claims alleged under this title and a brief
explanation of the reasons for that conclu-
sion.
‘‘(B) DISAGREEMENT
ON
AMOUNT
OF
DAMAGES OR LIKELIHOOD OF PREVAILING.—If
•HR 1058 EH1S
the parties do not agree on the amount of dam-
ages per share that would be recoverable if the
plaintiff prevailed on each claim alleged under
this title or on the likelihood that the plaintiff
would prevail on those claims, or both, a state-
ment from each settling party concerning the
issue or issues on which the parties disagree.
‘‘(C) INADMISSIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PUR-
POSES.—Statements made in accordance with
subparagraphs (A) and (B) concerning the
amount of damages and the likelihood of pre-
vailing shall not be admissible for purposes of
any Federal or State judicial action or adminis-
trative proceeding.
‘‘(2) STATEMENT
OF
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
OR
COSTS SOUGHT.—If any of the settling parties or
their counsel intend to apply to the court for an
award of attorneys’ fees or costs from any fund es-
tablished as part of the settlement, a statement indi-
cating which parties or counsel intend to make such
an application, the amount of fees and costs that
will be sought (including the amount of such fees
and costs determined on a per-share basis, together
with the amount of the settlement proposed to be
distributed to the parties to suit, determined on a
•HR 1058 EH1S
per-share basis), and a brief explanation of the basis
for the application. Such information shall be clearly
summarized on the cover page of any notice to a
party of any proposed or final settlement agreement.
‘‘(3) 
IDENTIFICATION
OF
LAWYERS’ 
REP-
RESENTATIVES.—The name and address of one or
more representatives of counsel for the class who
will be reasonably available to answer written ques-
tions from class members concerning any matter
contained in any notice of settlement published or
otherwise disseminated to the class.
‘‘(4) OTHER INFORMATION.—Such other infor-
mation as may be required by the court, or by any
plaintiff steering committee appointed by the court
pursuant to section 36.
‘‘(f) ENCOURAGEMENT
OF FINALITY
IN SETTLE-
MENT DISCHARGES.—
‘‘(1) DISCHARGE.—A defendant who settles any
private action arising under this title at any time be-
fore verdict or judgment shall be discharged from all
claims for contribution brought by other persons
with respect to the matters that are the subject of
such action. Upon entry of the settlement by the
court, the court shall enter a bar order constituting
the final discharge of all obligations to the plaintiff
•HR 1058 EH1S
of the settling defendant arising out of the action.
The order shall bar all future claims for contribution
arising out of the action—
‘‘(A) by any person against the settling de-
fendant; and
‘‘(B) by the settling defendant against any
person other than a person whose liability has
been extinguished by the settling defendant’s
settlement.
‘‘(2) REDUCTION.—If a person enters into a
settlement with the plaintiff prior to verdict or judg-
ment, the verdict or judgment shall be reduced by
the greater of—
‘‘(A) an amount that corresponds to the
percentage of responsibility of that person; or
‘‘(B) the amount paid to the plaintiff by
that person.
‘‘(g) CONTRIBUTION FROM NON-PARTIES IN INTER-
ESTS OF FAIRNESS.—
‘‘(1) RIGHT OF CONTRIBUTION.—A person who
becomes liable for damages in any private action
under this title (other than an action under section
9(e) or 18(a)) may recover contribution from any
other person who, if joined in the original suit,
would have been liable for the same damages.
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(2) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CONTRIBU-
TION.—Once judgment has been entered in any such
private action determining liability, an action for
contribution must be brought not later than 6
months after the entry of a final, nonappealable
judgment in the action.
‘‘(h) DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO WRITTEN INTERROG-
ATORIES ESTABLISHING SCIENTER.—In any private ac-
tion under this title in which the plaintiff may recover
money damages, the court shall, when requested by a de-
fendant, submit to the jury a written interrogatory on the
issue of each such defendant’s state of mind at the time
the alleged violation occurred.’’.
(b) PROHIBITION OF REFERRAL FEES THAT FO-
MENT LITIGATION.—Section 15(c) of the Securities Ex-
change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(c)) is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(8) RECEIPT OF REFERRAL FEES.—No broker or
dealer, or person associated with a broker or dealer, may
solicit or accept remuneration for assisting an attorney in
obtaining the representation of any customer in any pri-
vate action under this title.’’.
•HR 1058 EH1S
SEC. 4. PREVENTION OF ‘‘FISHING EXPEDITION’’ LAWSUITS.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 10 the fol-
lowing new section:
‘‘SEC. 10A. REQUIREMENTS FOR SECURITIES FRAUD AC-
TIONS.
‘‘(a) SCIENTER.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In any private action aris-
ing under section 10(b) of this title based on a
fraudulent statement, liability may be established
only on proof that—
‘‘(A) the defendant directly or indirectly
made a fraudulent statement;
‘‘(B) the defendant possessed the intention
to deceive, manipulate, or defraud; and
‘‘(C) the defendant made such fraudulent
statement knowingly or recklessly.
‘‘(2) FRAUDULENT STATEMENT.—For purposes
of this section, a fraudulent statement is a state-
ment that contains an untrue statement of a mate-
rial fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary
in order to make the statements made, in the light
of the circumstances in which they were made, not
misleading.
‘‘(3) KNOWINGLY.—For purposes of paragraph
(1), a defendant makes a fraudulent statement
•HR 1058 EH1S
knowingly if the defendant knew that the statement
of a material fact was untrue at the time it was
made, or knew that an omitted fact was necessary
in order to make the statements made, in the light
of the circumstances in which they were made, not
misleading.
‘‘(4) RECKLESSNESS.—For purposes of para-
graph (1), a defendant makes a fraudulent state-
ment recklessly if the defendant, in making such
statement, is guilty of highly unreasonable conduct
that (A) involves not merely simple or even gross
negligence, but an extreme departure from standards
of ordinary care, and (B) presents a danger of mis-
leading buyers, sellers, or security holders that was
either known to the defendant or so obvious that the
defendant must have been aware of it. Deliberately
refraining from taking steps to discover whether
one’s statements are false or misleading constitutes
recklessness, but if the failure to investigate was not
deliberate, such conduct shall not be considered to
be reckless.
‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT
FOR EXPLICIT PLEADING
OF
SCIENTER.—In any private action to which subsection (a)
applies, the complaint shall specify each statement or
omission alleged to have been misleading, and the reasons
•HR 1058 EH1S
the statement or omission was misleading. The complaint
shall also make specific allegations which, if true, would
be sufficient to establish scienter as to each defendant at
the time the alleged violation occurred. It shall not be suf-
ficient for this purpose to plead the mere presence of facts
inconsistent with a statement or omission alleged to have
been misleading. If an allegation is made on information
and belief, the complaint shall set forth with specificity
all information on which that belief is formed.
‘‘(c) DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO MEET PLEADING
REQUIREMENTS; STAY OF DISCOVERY; SUMMARY JUDG-
MENT.—In any private action to which subsection (a) ap-
plies, the court shall, on the motion of any defendant, dis-
miss the complaint if the requirements of subsection (b)
are not met, except that the court may, in its discretion,
permit a single amended complaint to be filed. During the
pendency of any such motion to dismiss, all discovery and
other proceedings shall be stayed unless the court finds
upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery
is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prej-
udice to that party. If a complaint satisfies the require-
ments of subsection (b), the plaintiff shall be entitled to
conduct discovery limited to the facts concerning the alleg-
edly misleading statement or omission. Upon completion
•HR 1058 EH1S
of such discovery, the parties may move for summary
judgment.
‘‘(d) RELIANCE AND CAUSATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In any private action to
which subsection (a) applies, the plaintiff shall prove
that—
‘‘(A) he or she had knowledge of, and re-
lied (in connection with the purchase or sale of
a security) on, the statement that contained the
misstatement or omission described in sub-
section (a)(1); and
‘‘(B) that the statement containing such
misstatement or omission proximately caused
(through both transaction causation and loss
causation) any loss incurred by the plaintiff.
‘‘(2) FRAUD ON THE MARKET.—For purposes
of paragraph (1), knowledge and reliance may be
proven by establishing that the market as a whole
considered the fraudulent statement, that the price
at which the security was purchased or sold reflected
the market’s estimation of the fraudulent statement,
and that the plaintiff relied on that market price.
Proof that the market as a whole considered the
fraudulent statement may consist of evidence that
the statement—
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(A) was published in publicly available re-
search reports by analysts of such security;
‘‘(B) was the subject of news articles;
‘‘(C) was delivered orally at public meet-
ings by officers of the issuer, or its agents;
‘‘(D) was specifically considered by rating
agencies in their published reports; or
‘‘(E) was otherwise made publicly available
to the market in a manner that was likely to
bring it to the attention of, and to be consid-
ered as credible by, other active participants in
the market for such security.
Nonpublic information may not be used as proof
that the market as a whole considered the fraudu-
lent statement.
‘‘(3) PRESUMPTION OF RELIANCE.—Upon proof
that the market as a whole considered the fraudu-
lent statement pursuant to paragraph (2), the plain-
tiff is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the
price at which the security was purchased or sold re-
flected the market’s estimation of the fraudulent
statement and that the plaintiff relied on such mar-
ket price. This presumption may be rebutted by evi-
dence that—
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(A) the market as a whole considered
other information that corrected the allegedly
fraudulent statement; or
‘‘(B) the plaintiff possessed such corrective
information prior to the purchase or sale of the
security.
‘‘(4) REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF INTEGRITY
OF MARKET PRICE.—A plaintiff who buys or sells a
security for which it is unreasonable to rely on mar-
ket price to reflect all current information may not
establish reliance pursuant to paragraph (2). For
purposes of paragraph (2), the following factors
shall be considered in determining whether it was
reasonable for a party to expect the market price of
the security to reflect substantially all publicly avail-
able information regarding the issuer of the security:
‘‘(A) The weekly trading volume of any
class of securities of the issuer of the security.
‘‘(B) The existence of public reports by se-
curities analysts concerning any class of securi-
ties of the issuer of the security.
‘‘(C) The eligibility of the issuer of the se-
curity, under the rules and regulations of the
Commission, to incorporate by reference its re-
ports made pursuant to section 13 of this title
•HR 1058 EH1S
in a registration statement filed under the Se-
curities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale
of equity securities.
‘‘(D) A history of immediate movement of
the price of any class of securities of the issuer
of the security caused by the public dissemina-
tion of information regarding unexpected cor-
porate events or financial releases.
In no event shall it be considered reasonable for a
party to expect the market price of the security to
reflect substantially all publicly available information
regarding the issuer of the security unless the issuer
of the security has a class of securities listed and
registered on a national securities exchange or
quoted on the automated quotation system of a na-
tional securities association.
‘‘(e) ALLOCATION OF LIABILITY.—
‘‘(1) JOINT
AND
SEVERAL
LIABILITY
FOR
KNOWING FRAUD.—A defendant who is found liable
for damages in a private action to which subsection
(a) applies may be liable jointly and severally only
if the trier of fact specifically determines that the
defendant acted knowingly (as defined in subsection
(a)(3)).
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(2) PROPORTIONATE
LIABILITY
FOR
RECK-
LESSNESS.—If the trier of fact does not make the
findings required by paragraph (1) for joint and sev-
eral liability, a defendant’s liability in a private ac-
tion to which subsection (a) applies shall be deter-
mined under paragraph (3) of this subsection only
if the trier of fact specifically determines that the
defendant acted recklessly (as defined in subsection
(a)(4)).
‘‘(3) DETERMINATION OF PROPORTIONATE LI-
ABILITY.—If the trier of fact makes the findings re-
quired by paragraph (2), the defendant’s liability
shall be determined as follows:
‘‘(A) The trier of fact shall determine the
percentage of responsibility of the plaintiff, of
each of the defendants, and of each of the other
persons or entities alleged by the parties to
have caused or contributed to the harm alleged
by the plaintiff. In determining the percentages
of responsibility, the trier of fact shall consider
both the nature of the conduct of each person
and the nature and extent of the causal rela-
tionship between that conduct and the damage
claimed by the plaintiff.
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(B) For each defendant, the trier of fact
shall then multiply the defendant’s percentage
of responsibility by the total amount of damage
suffered by the plaintiff that was caused in
whole or in part by that defendant and the
court shall enter a verdict or judgment against
the defendant in that amount. No defendant
whose liability is determined under this sub-
section shall be jointly liable on any judgment
entered against any other party to the action.
‘‘(C) Except where contractual relationship
permits, no defendant whose liability is deter-
mined under this paragraph shall have a right
to recover any portion of the judgment entered
against such defendant from another defendant.
‘‘(4) EFFECT OF PROVISION.—This subsection
relates only to the allocation of damages among de-
fendants. Nothing in this subsection shall affect the
standards for liability under any private action aris-
ing under this title.
‘‘(f) DAMAGES.—In any private action to which sub-
section (a) applies, and in which the plaintiff claims to
have bought or sold the security based on a reasonable
belief that the market value of the security reflected all
•HR 1058 EH1S
publicly available information, the plaintiff’s damages
shall not exceed the lesser of—
‘‘(1) the difference between the price paid by
the plaintiff for the security and the market value of
the security immediately after dissemination to the
market of information which corrects the fraudulent
statement; and
‘‘(2) the difference between the price paid by
the plaintiff for the security and the price at which
the plaintiff sold the security after dissemination of
information correcting the fraudulent statement.’’.
SEC. 5. ESTABLISHMENT OF ‘‘SAFE HARBOR’’ FOR PRE-
DICTIVE STATEMENTS.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following
new section:
‘‘SEC. 37. APPLICATION OF SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD-
LOOKING STATEMENTS.
‘‘(a) SAFE HARBOR IN GENERAL.—In any private ac-
tion arising under this title based on a fraudulent state-
ment (as defined in section 10A), a person shall not be
liable with respect to any forward-looking statement if and
to the extent that the statement—
‘‘(1) contains a projection, estimate, or descrip-
tion of future events; and
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(2) refers clearly (or is understood by the re-
cipient to refer) to—
‘‘(A) such projections, estimates, or de-
scriptions as forward-looking statements; and
‘‘(B) the risk that such projections, esti-
mates, or descriptions may not be realized.
The safe harbor for forward-looking statements estab-
lished under this subsection shall be in addition to any
safe harbor the Commission may establish by rule or regu-
lation.
‘‘(b) DEFINITION
OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATE-
MENT.—For the purpose of this section, the term ‘for-
ward-looking statement’ shall include (but not be limited
to) projections, estimates, and descriptions of future
events, whether made orally or in writing, voluntarily or
otherwise.
‘‘(c) NO DUTY TO MAKE CONTINUING PROJEC-
TIONS.—In any private action arising under this title, no
person shall be deemed to have any obligation to update
a forward-looking statement made by such person unless
such person has expressly and substantially contempora-
neously undertaken to update such statement.
‘‘(d) AUTOMATIC PROCEDURE FOR STAYING DISCOV-
ERY; EXPEDITED PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF
MOTION ON APPLICABILITY OF SAFE HARBOR.—
•HR 1058 EH1S
‘‘(1) STAY PENDING DECISION ON MOTION.—
Upon motion by a defendant to dismiss on the
ground that the statement or omission upon which
the complaint is based is a forward-looking state-
ment within the meaning of this section and that the
safe harbor provisions of this section preclude a
claim for relief, the court shall stay discovery until
such motion is decided.
‘‘(2) PROTECTIVE ORDERS.—If the court denies
a motion to dismiss to which paragraph (1) is appli-
cable, or if no such motion is made and a party
makes a motion for a protective order, at any time
beginning after the filing of the complaint and end-
ing 10 days after the filing of such party’s answer
to the complaint, asserting that the safe harbor pro-
visions of this section apply to the action, a protec-
tive order shall issue forthwith to stay all discovery
as to any party to whom the safe harbor provisions
of this section may apply, except that which is di-
rected to the specific issue of the applicability of the
safe harbor. A hearing on the applicability of the
safe harbor shall be conducted within 45 days of the
issuance of the protective order. At the conclusion of
the hearing, the court shall either dismiss the por-
tion of the action based upon the use of the forward-
•HR 1058 EH1S
looking information or determine that the safe har-
bor is unavailable in the circumstances.
‘‘(e) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Commission
shall exercise its authority to describe conduct with respect
to the making of forward-looking statements that will be
deemed not to provide a basis for liability in private ac-
tions under this title. Such rules and regulations shall—
‘‘(1) include clear and objective guidance that
the Commission finds sufficient for the protection of
investors;
‘‘(2) prescribe such guidance with sufficient
particularity that compliance shall be readily ascer-
tainable by issuers prior to issuance of securities;
and
‘‘(3) provide that forward-looking statements
that are in compliance with such guidance and that
concern the future economic performance of an is-
suer of securities registered under section 12 of this
title will be deemed not to be in violation of this
title.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to limit, either
expressly or by implication, the authority of the Commis-
sion to exercise similar authority or to adopt similar rules
and regulations with respect to forward-looking state-
•HR 1058 EH1S
ments under other statutes under which the Commission
exercises rulemaking authority.’’.
SEC. 6. AMENDMENT TO RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND
CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT.
Section 1964(c) of title 18, United States Code, is
amended by inserting ‘‘, except that no person may bring
an action under this provision if the racketeering activity,
as defined in section 1961(1)(D), involves conduct action-
able as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities’’ before
the period.
SEC. 7. FINANCIAL FRAUD DETECTION AND DISCLOSURE.
(a) AMENDMENTS TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934.—The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
amended by inserting after section 13 (15 U.S.C. 78m)
the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 13A. FRAUD DETECTION AND DISCLOSURE.
‘‘(a) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS.—Each audit required
pursuant to this title of an issuer’s financial statements
by an independent public accountant shall include, in ac-
cordance with generally accepted auditing standards, as
may be modified or supplemented from time to time by
the Commission, the following:
‘‘(1) procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance of detecting illegal acts that would have a
•HR 1058 EH1S
direct and material effect on the determination of fi-
nancial statement amounts;
‘‘(2) procedures designed to identify related
party transactions which are material to the finan-
cial statements or otherwise require disclosure there-
in; and
‘‘(3) an evaluation of whether there is substan-
tial doubt about the issuer’s ability to continue as a
going concern over the ensuing fiscal year.
‘‘(b) REQUIRED
RESPONSE
TO
AUDIT
DISCOV-
ERIES.—
‘‘(1) INVESTIGATION AND REPORT TO MANAGE-
MENT.—If, in the course of conducting any audit
pursuant to this title to which subsection (a) applies,
the independent public accountant detects or other-
wise becomes aware of information indicating that
an illegal act (whether or not perceived to have a
material effect on the issuer’s financial statements)
has or may have occurred, the accountant shall, in
accordance with generally accepted auditing stand-
ards, as may be modified or supplemented from time
to time by the Commission—
‘‘(A)(i) determine whether it is likely that
an illegal act has occurred, and (ii) if so, deter-
mine and consider the possible effect of the ille-
•HR 1058 EH1S
gal act on the financial statements of the is-
suer, including any contingent monetary effects,
such as fines, penalties, and damages; and
‘‘(B) as soon as practicable inform the ap-
propriate level of the issuer’s management and
assure that the issuer’s audit committee, or the
issuer’s board of directors in the absence of
such a committee, is adequately informed with
respect to illegal acts that have been detected or
otherwise come to the attention of such ac-
countant in the course of the audit, unless the
illegal act is clearly inconsequential.
‘‘(2) RESPONSE TO FAILURE TO TAKE REME-
DIAL ACTION.—If, having first assured itself that
the audit committee of the board of directors of the
issuer or the board (in the absence of an audit com-
mittee) is adequately informed with respect to illegal
acts that have been detected or otherwise come to
the accountant’s attention in the course of such ac-
countant’s audit, the independent public accountant
concludes that—
‘‘(A) any such illegal act has a material ef-
fect on the financial statements of the issuer,
‘‘(B) senior management has not taken,
and the board of directors has not caused sen-
•HR 1058 EH1S
ior management to take, timely and appropriate
remedial actions with respect to such illegal act,
and
‘‘(C) the failure to take remedial action is
reasonably expected to warrant departure from
a standard auditor’s report, when made, or
warrant resignation from the audit engagement,
the independent public accountant shall, as soon as
practicable, directly report its conclusions to the
board of directors.
‘‘(3) NOTICE
TO
COMMISSION; RESPONSE
TO
FAILURE TO NOTIFY.—An issuer whose board of di-
rectors has received a report pursuant to paragraph
(2) shall inform the Commission by notice within
one business day of receipt of such report and shall
furnish the independent public accountant making
such report with a copy of the notice furnished the
Commission. If the independent public accountant
making such report shall fail to receive a copy of
such notice within the required one-business-day pe-
riod, the independent public accountant shall—
‘‘(A) resign from the engagement; or
‘‘(B) furnish to the Commission a copy of
its report (or the documentation of any oral re-
•HR 1058 EH1S
port given) within the next business day follow-
ing such failure to receive notice.
‘‘(4) REPORT AFTER RESIGNATION.—An inde-
pendent public accountant electing resignation shall,
within the one business day following a failure by an
issuer to notify the Commission under paragraph
(3), furnish to the Commission a copy of the ac-
countant’s report (or the documentation of any oral
report given).
‘‘(c) AUDITOR LIABILITY LIMITATION.—No inde-
pendent public accountant shall be liable in a private ac-
tion for any finding, conclusion, or statement expressed
in a report made pursuant to paragraph (3) or (4) of sub-
section (b), including any rules promulgated pursuant
thereto.
‘‘(d) CIVIL PENALTIES IN CEASE-AND-DESIST PRO-
CEEDINGS.—If the Commission finds, after notice and op-
portunity for hearing in a proceeding instituted pursuant
to section 21C of this title, that an independent public
accountant has willfully violated paragraph (3) or (4) of
subsection (b) of this section, then the Commission may,
in addition to entering an order under section 21C, impose
a civil penalty against the independent public accountant
and any other person that the Commission finds was a
cause of such violation. The determination whether to im-
•HR 1058 EH1S
pose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty,
shall be governed by the standards set forth in section 21B
of this title.
‘‘(e) PRESERVATION OF EXISTING AUTHORITY.—Ex-
cept for subsection (d), nothing in this section limits or
otherwise affects the authority of the Commission under
this title.
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term
‘illegal act’ means any action or omission to act that vio-
lates any law, or any rule or regulation having the force
of law.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—As to any registrant that
is required to file selected quarterly financial data pursu-
ant to item 302(a) of Regulation S–K (17 CFR
229.302(a)) of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section
shall apply to any annual report for any period beginning
on or after January 1, 1996. As to any other registrant,
such amendment shall apply for any period beginning on
or after January 1, 1997.
SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in the amendments made by this Act shall
be deemed to create or ratify any implied private right
of action, or to prevent the Commission by rule from re-
•HR 1058 EH1S
stricting or otherwise regulating private actions under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act and the amendments made by this Act are
effective on the date of enactment of this Act and shall
apply to cases commenced after such date of enactment.
Passed the House of Representatives March 8,
1995.
Attest:
Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1058
AN ACT
To reform Federal securities litigation, and for
other purposes.