I 
119TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 5811 
To promote the leadership of the United States in global innovation by 
establishing a robust patent system that restores and protects the right 
of inventors to own and enforce private property rights in inventions 
and discoveries, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 24, 2025 
Mr. MASSIE (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. ROY, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. CLOUD, 
and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To promote the leadership of the United States in global 
innovation by establishing a robust patent system that 
restores and protects the right of inventors to own and 
enforce private property rights in inventions and discov-
eries, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 
‘‘Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 
2025’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for 
this Act is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 
Sec. 2. Findings. 
Sec. 3. Restoring the right of the first inventor to secure a patent. 
Sec. 4. Abolishing inter partes and post-grant review. 
Sec. 5. Abolishing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. 
Sec. 6. Elimination of fee diversion and full funding of the United States Pat-
ent and Trademark Office. 
Sec. 7. Patentability of scientific discoveries and software inventions. 
Sec. 8. Limitations on prior art. 
Sec. 9. Restoring patents as a property right. 
Sec. 10. Ending automatic publication of patent applications. 
Sec. 11. Presumption of validity; defenses. 
Sec. 12. Injunction. 
Sec. 13. Best mode requirement. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Congress created a patent system to 
‘‘promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, 
by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inven-
tors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings 
and Discoveries,’’ as provided for in the Constitution 
of the United States. 
(2) The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 
(Public Law 112–29) enacted on September 16, 
2011, and several decisions of the Supreme Court 
have harmed the progress of Science and the useful 
Arts by eroding the strength and value of the patent 
system. 
(3) The United States Government exists to 
protect life, liberty, and property, which includes in-
tellectual property. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
public use’’ and ‘‘on sale in this country’’ as interpreted 
before the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents 
Act. 
(d) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) reverting the United States patent system 
from a ‘‘first-to-file’’ system back to ‘‘first-to-in-
vent’’ system will promote the progress of science 
and the useful arts by securing for limited times to 
inventors the exclusive rights to their discoveries and 
incentivize innovation and protect inventors’ rights; 
(2) restoring the one-year grace period before 
the first and true inventor must file a patent appli-
cation on an invention will promote the progress of 
science and useful arts by enabling inventors once 
again to disclose inventions in order to attract in-
vestment, complete research and development on the 
invention, test, improve, and perfect the invention so 
as to improve the invention and the quality of the 
patent application; and 
(3) the repeal of section 3, and the amendments 
made by section 3, of the Leahy-Smith America In-
vents Act, restore sections 100, 102, 103, 135, and 
291 of title 35, United States Code, to the way such 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
sections read on the day before the date of the en-
actment of such Act. 
SEC. 4. ABOLISHING INTER PARTES AND POST-GRANT RE-
VIEW. 
(a) REPEAL OF INTER PARTES AND POST-GRANT 
REVIEW.—Section 6 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents 
Act (Public Law 112–29), including each amendment 
made by such section, is repealed and any amendment 
made by such section to any provision shall be effective 
as if the provision had not been amended by such section. 
(b) REPEAL OF CODIFIED TITLES.—Chapters 31 and 
32 of title 35, United States Code, are repealed. 
(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) inter partes review and post-grant review 
proceedings introduced by the Leahy-Smith America 
Invents Act have harmed the progress of science and 
the useful arts by subjecting inventors to serial chal-
lenges to patents; 
(2) inter partes review and post-grant review 
proceedings invalidate patents at an unreasonably 
high rate; 
(3) patent rights should be protected from un-
fair adjudication at the Patent and Trademark Of-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
fice and duly issued patents should be adjudicated in 
a judicial proceeding; 
(4) repealing section 6 of the Leahy-Smith 
America Invents Act abolishes inter partes review, 
post-grant review, and the previously available inter 
partes reexamination proceedings; and 
(5) it is the intent of Congress to preserve ex 
parte reexamination proceedings under chapter 30 of 
title 35, United States Code. 
SEC. 5. ABOLISHING THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL 
BOARD. 
(a) REPEAL
OF
PATENT
TRIAL
AND
APPEAL 
BOARD.—Section 7 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents 
Act (Public Law 112–29) is repealed, including each 
amendment made by such section, and any amendment 
made by such section to any provision shall be effective 
as if the provision had not been amended by such section. 
(b) BOARD
OF
PATENT
APPEALS
AND
INTER-
FERENCES.— 
(1) AMENDMENT.—Section 6 of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 6. Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT
AND COMPOSITION.—There 
shall be in the Patent and Trademark Office a Board of 
Patent Appeals and Interferences. The Director, the Dep-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
uty Director, the Commissioner for Patents, the Commis-
sioner for Trademarks, and the administrative patent 
judges shall constitute the Board. The administrative pat-
ent judges shall be persons of competent legal knowledge 
and scientific ability who are appointed by the Secretary 
of Commerce, in consultation with the Director. 
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—The Board of Patent Appeals and 
Interferences shall, on written appeal of an applicant, re-
view adverse decisions of examiners upon applications for 
patents and shall determine priority and patentability of 
invention in interferences declared under section 135(a). 
Each appeal and interference shall be heard by at least 
three members of the Board, who shall be designated by 
the Director. Only the Board of Patent Appeals and Inter-
ferences may grant rehearings. The Board shall not invali-
date an issued patent except in an ex parte reexamination 
under chapter 30. 
‘‘(c) AUTHORITY
OF
THE SECRETARY.—The Sec-
retary of Commerce may, in the Secretary’s discretion, 
deem the appointment of an administrative patent judge 
who, before the date of the enactment of this subsection, 
held office pursuant to an appointment by the Director, 
to take effect on the date on which the Director initially 
appointed the administrative patent judge. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘(d) DEFENSE TO CHALLENGE OF APPOINTMENT.— 
It shall be a defense to a challenge to the appointment 
of an administrative patent judge on the basis of the 
judge’s having been originally appointed by the Director 
that the administrative patent judge so appointed was act-
ing as a de facto officer.’’. 
(2) TECHNICAL
AND
CONFORMING
AMEND-
MENT.—The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 
35, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 6 and inserting the following 
new item: 
‘‘6. Board of patent appeals and interferences.’’. 
(c) APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 
AND INTERFERENCES.— 
(1) AMENDMENT.—Section 134 of title 35, 
United States Code, as reinstated by section 3(a) of 
this Act, is amended by striking subsection (c). 
(2) TECHNICAL
AND
CONFORMING
AMEND-
MENT.—The table of sections for chapter 12 of title 
35, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 134 and inserting the fol-
lowing new item: 
‘‘134. Appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.’’. 
(d) APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 
FEDERAL CIRCUIT.—Section 141 of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘§ 141. Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit 
‘‘(a) EXAMINATIONS.—An applicant dissatisfied with 
the decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals 
and Interferences under section 134 may appeal the deci-
sion directly to the United States Court of Appeals for 
the Federal Circuit, or may seek review de novo in any 
district court of the United States of competent jurisdic-
tion. 
‘‘(b) REEXAMINATIONS.—A patent owner who is, in 
a reexamination proceeding, dissatisfied with the final de-
cision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and 
Interferences under section 134 may appeal the decision 
directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fed-
eral Circuit, or may seek review de novo in a district court 
of the United States of competent jurisdiction. 
‘‘(c) INTERFERENCE.—A party to an interference 
dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Ap-
peals and Interferences on the interference may appeal the 
decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the 
Federal Circuit, but such appeal shall be dismissed if any 
adverse party to such interference, within twenty days 
after the appellant has filed notice of appeal in accordance 
with section 142, files notice with the Director that the 
party elects to have all further proceedings conducted as 
provided in section 146. If the appellant does not, within 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
thirty days after filing of such notice by the adverse party, 
file a civil action under section 146, the decision appealed 
from shall govern the further proceedings in the case.’’. 
(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) the Patent Trial and Appeal Board shall be 
replaced with the former Board of Patent Appeals 
and Interferences; 
(2) with the abolishment of inter partes review 
and post-grant review proceedings, the Patent Trial 
and Appeal Board is no longer needed to conduct 
these duties; 
(3) unless otherwise in the context of an ex 
parte reexamination under chapter 30 of title 35, 
United States Code, the Board of Patent Appeals 
and Interferences will not be used to invalidate an 
already issued patent; 
(4) the changes described in paragraphs (1) 
through (3) will protect the rights of patent owners 
who have been granted a patent and ensure a fair, 
fully adjudicated proceeding to invalidate an issued 
patent; 
(5) the amendment to section 6 of title 35, 
United States Code, reflects Congress’s intent to re-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
quire a judicial proceeding to invalidate an issued 
patent; and 
(6) the amendments to section 134 of title 35, 
United States Code, and section 141 of title 35, 
United States Code, are intended to restore each re-
spective section to its prior state, but delete any ref-
erence to inter partes reexamination, which is no 
longer available. 
SEC. 6. ELIMINATION OF FEE DIVERSION AND FULL FUND-
ING OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND 
TRADEMARK OFFICE. 
(a) PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FUNDING.— 
Section 42 of title 35, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) All fees’’ 
and inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Fees’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(b) All fees’’ and inserting 
‘‘(b) CREDIT OF FEES.—Fees’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Patent and Trademark 
Office Appropriation Account’’ and inserting 
‘‘United States Patent and Trademark Office 
Innovation Promotion Fund’’; 
(3) in subsection (c)— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(A) by striking ‘‘(1) To the extent’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘fees’’ and inserting ‘‘(c) 
USE OF FEES.—(1) Fees’’; 
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘shall be 
collected by and shall, subject to paragraph (3), 
be available to the Director’’ and inserting 
‘‘shall be collected by the Director and shall be 
available to the Director until expended’’; 
(C) by striking paragraph (2); and 
(D) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 
paragraph (2); 
(4) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 
subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and 
(5) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) REVOLVING FUND.— 
‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) FUND.—The term ‘Fund’ means the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office In-
novation Promotion Fund established under 
paragraph (2). 
‘‘(B) TRADEMARK ACT OF 1946.—The term 
‘Trademark Act of 1946’ means the Act enti-
tled ‘An Act to provide for the registration and 
protection of trademarks used in commerce, to 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
carry out the provisions of certain international 
conventions, and for other purposes’, approved 
July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) (com-
monly referred to as the ‘Trademark Act of 
1946’ or the ‘Lanham Act’). 
‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in 
the Treasury a revolving fund to be known as the 
‘United States Patent and Trademark Office Inno-
vation Promotion Fund’. 
‘‘(3) DERIVATION OF RESOURCES.—There shall 
be deposited into the Fund any fees collected 
under— 
‘‘(A) this title; or 
‘‘(B) the Trademark Act of 1946. 
‘‘(4) EXPENSES.—Amounts deposited into the 
Fund under paragraph (3) shall be available, with-
out fiscal year limitation, to cover— 
‘‘(A) all expenses to the extent consistent 
with the limitation on the use of fees set forth 
in subsection (c), including all administrative 
and operating expenses, determined in the dis-
cretion of the Director to be ordinary and rea-
sonable, incurred by the Director for the contin-
ued operation of all services, programs, activi-
ties, and duties of the Office relating to patents 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
and trademarks, as such services, programs, ac-
tivities, and duties are described under— 
‘‘(i) this title; and 
‘‘(ii) the Trademark Act of 1946; and 
‘‘(B) all expenses incurred pursuant to any 
obligation, representation, or other commitment 
of the Office.’’; 
(6) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘The Director’’ and inserting ‘‘REFUNDS.— 
The Director’’; and 
(7) in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by 
striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘REPORT.— 
The Secretary’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE; TRANSFER FROM AND TERMI-
NATION OF OBSOLETE FUNDS.— 
(1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 
by subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day 
of the first fiscal year that begins on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) REMAINING BALANCES.—There shall be de-
posited in the Fund, on the effective date described 
in paragraph (1), any available unobligated balances 
remaining in the Patent and Trademark Office Ap-
propriation Account, and in the Patent and Trade-
mark Fee Reserve Fund established under section 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
42(c)(2) of title 35, United States Code, as in effect 
on the day before the effective date. 
(3) TERMINATION OF RESERVE FUND.—Upon 
the payment of all obligated amounts in the Patent 
and Trademark Fee Reserve Fund under paragraph 
(2), the Patent and Trademark Fee Reserve Fund 
shall be terminated. 
SEC. 7. PATENTABILITY OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES AND 
SOFTWARE INVENTIONS. 
(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 101 of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 101. Inventions patentable 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever invents or discovers 
any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or 
composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement 
thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the condi-
tions and requirements of this title. 
‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—A claimed invention is ineligible 
patent subject matter under subsection (a) if the claimed 
invention as a whole, as understood by a person having 
ordinary skill in the art, exists in nature independently 
of and prior to any human activity, or exists solely in the 
human mind. 
‘‘(c) ELIGIBILITY STANDARD.—The eligibility of a 
claimed invention under subsections (a) and (b) shall be 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
determined without regard as to the requirements or con-
ditions of sections 102, 103, and 112 of this title, or the 
claimed invention’s inventive concept.’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) the Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence 
concerning subject matter patentability has harmed 
the progress of science and the useful arts; 
(2) the United States patent system must pro-
tect and encourage research and development in 
such scientific disciplines as would promote the 
progress of science and the useful arts by securing 
for limited times to inventors the exclusive rights to 
their discoveries and provide scientists in the life 
sciences, computer sciences, and other disciplines, 
with certainty that their discoveries and inventions 
are entitled to patent protection; and 
(3) this amendment effectively abrogates Alice 
Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 
(2014), Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), As-
sociation for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genet-
ics, 569 U.S. 576 (2013), Mayo Collaborative Serv-
ices v. Prometheus Laboratories, 566 U.S. 66 
(2012), and its predecessors to ensure that life 
sciences discoveries, computer software, and similar 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
inventions and discoveries are patentable, and that 
those patents are enforceable. 
SEC. 8. LIMITATIONS ON PRIOR ART. 
Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 102. Conditions for patentability; novelty 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A person shall be entitled to a 
patent unless— 
‘‘(1) the invention was known or used by others 
in this country, or patented or described in a printed 
publication in this or a foreign country, before the 
invention thereof by the applicant for patent; 
‘‘(2) the invention was patented or described in 
a printed publication in this or a foreign country or 
in public use or on sale in this country, more than 
one year prior to the date of the application for pat-
ent in the United States; 
‘‘(3) he has abandoned the invention; 
‘‘(4) the invention was first patented or caused 
to be patented, or was the subject of an inventor’s 
certificate, by the applicant or his legal representa-
tives or assigns in a foreign country prior to the 
date of the application for patent in this country on 
an application for patent or inventor’s certificate 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
filed more than twelve months before the filing of 
the application in the United States; 
‘‘(5) the invention was described in (1) an ap-
plication for patent, published under section 122(b), 
by another filed in the United States before the in-
vention by the applicant for patent or (2) a patent 
granted on an application for patent by another filed 
in the United States before the invention by the ap-
plicant for patent, except that an international appli-
cation filed under the treaty defined in section 
351(a) shall have the effects for the purposes of this 
subsection of an application filed in the United 
States only if the international application des-
ignated the United States and was published under 
Article 21(2) of such treaty in the English language; 
‘‘(6) he did not himself invent the subject mat-
ter sought to be patented; or 
‘‘(7)(A) during the course of an interference 
conducted under section 135 or section 291, another 
inventor involved therein establishes, to the extent 
permitted in section 104, that before such person’s 
invention thereof the invention was made by such 
other inventor and not abandoned, suppressed, or 
concealed; or 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘(B) before such person’s invention thereof, the 
invention was made in this country by another in-
ventor who had not abandoned, suppressed, or con-
cealed it. In determining priority of invention under 
this subsection, there shall be considered not only 
the respective dates of conception and reduction to 
practice of the invention, but also the reasonable 
diligence of one who was first to conceive and last 
to reduce to practice, from a time prior to concep-
tion by the other. 
‘‘(b) DISCLOSURES IN PATENT APPLICATIONS AND 
PATENTS.—A disclosure shall not be prior art to a claimed 
invention under this section if before the issuance of a pat-
ent— 
‘‘(1) the information disclosed was obtained di-
rectly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint in-
ventor; 
‘‘(2) the information disclosed to the Office or 
another party during the one-year period prior to 
the date of the application for patent had, before a 
patent application for the information was effectively 
filed, been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a 
joint inventor; or 
‘‘(3) the information disclosed and the claimed 
invention, not later than the effective filing date of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
the claimed invention, were owned by the same per-
son or subject to an obligation of assignment to the 
same person.’’. 
SEC. 9. RESTORING PATENTS AS A PROPERTY RIGHT. 
(a) PRIVATE PROPERTY PATENT RIGHT.— 
(1) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 10 of title 35, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 106. Private property patent right 
‘‘A patent right is a private property right secured 
to an inventor upon issuance of the patent that shall only 
be revoked by a court ruling in a judicial proceeding, un-
less the patent owner consents to an administrative or 
other procedure.’’. 
(2) TECHNICAL
AND
CONFORMING
AMEND-
MENT.—The table of sections for chapter 10 of title 
35, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item: 
‘‘106. Private property patent right.’’. 
(b) OWNERSHIP; ASSIGNMENT.—Section 261 of title 
35, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘patents 
shall have the attributes of personal property’’ and 
inserting the following: ‘‘patents shall be recognized 
as private property rights’’; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(2) by inserting after the second sentence the 
following: 
‘‘As private property rights, applications for patents, 
patents, and interests therein shall be freely transferrable, 
in whole or in part, including conveyance by assignment 
or license. Any successors, heirs, assigns, or licensees of 
a patent owner, who receive a lesser interest in a patent, 
shall be subject to any and all restrictions of their interest 
in the patent, provided that the successors, heirs, assigns, 
or licensees have actual or constructive notice of such re-
strictions.’’. 
(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
(1) recent jurisprudence of the United States 
Supreme Court, including Oil States Energy Serv-
ices v. Greene’s Energy Group, 138 S. Ct. 1365 
(2018), have harmed the progress of science and the 
useful arts by unconstitutionally changing the treat-
ment of fundamental patent rights to government- 
bestowed public franchises from the Founders’ origi-
nal intent of exclusive private property rights of lim-
ited duration; 
(2) recent jurisprudence of the United States 
Supreme Court, including Impression Products Inc. 
v. Lexmark International, Inc., have harmed the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
progress of science and the useful arts by limiting 
the ability of patent owners to exclude unlicensed 
customers from their supply chains; and 
(3) meaningful patent rights must permit pat-
ent owners to freely assign their rights in whole, or 
in part, and to ensure that successors, heirs, or as-
signs of a patent owner, or their assigns, are duly 
bound by restrictions or exclusions set by patent 
owners on the use of their property. 
SEC. 10. ENDING AUTOMATIC PUBLICATION OF PATENT AP-
PLICATIONS. 
(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 122(b) of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) PUBLICATION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each application for a pat-
ent shall be published, in accordance with procedures 
determined by the Director, only upon the request of 
the patent applicant. 
‘‘(2) INFORMATION RELEASED ONCE A PATENT 
ISSUES.—No information concerning a patent appli-
cation shall be available to the public unless and 
until a patent issues.’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(1) automatic publication of patent applications 
after 18 months has harmed the progress of science 
and the useful arts by creating ‘‘prior art’’ by oper-
ation of law that prevents a patent owner from ap-
plying for a patent on the same invention if a patent 
does not issue; and 
(2) automatic publication of patent applications 
encourages early disclosure of claimed inventions 
and subjects innovative inventions and discoveries 
reduced to practice in the United States to theft or 
appropriation by foreign competitors. 
SEC. 11. PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY; DEFENSES. 
(a) VALIDITY OF A PATENT IN ADJUDICATORY PRO-
CEEDINGS.—Section 282(a) of title 35, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 
‘‘(1) PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY FOR A PAT-
ENT.—In any judicial or administrative proceeding 
conducted in any court or Federal agency (as de-
fined in section 201) or of any State, a patent issued 
under this title shall be presumed valid. 
‘‘(2) PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY FOR CLAIMS 
OF A PATENT.—In any proceeding described under 
paragraph (1)— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
‘‘(A) each claim of a patent (whether in 
independent, dependent, or multiple dependent 
form) shall be presumed valid independently of 
the validity of other claims; and 
‘‘(B) dependent or multiple dependent 
claims shall be presumed valid even though de-
pendent upon an invalid claim. 
‘‘(3) BURDEN OF ESTABLISHING INVALIDITY.— 
In any proceeding described under paragraph (1) in 
which the validity of a patent is at issue, the burden 
of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim 
thereof rests on the party asserting the invalidity by 
clear and convincing evidence.’’. 
(b) TOLLING PATENT TERM DURING JUDICIAL 
CHALLENGE.—Section 282 of title 35, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(d) TOLLING OF PATENT TERM DURING VALIDITY 
CHALLENGE.—In an action involving a patent where the 
validity of the patent has been challenged, the patent term 
shall be tolled from the time the validity of the patent is 
challenged to the time of resolution of the validity issue 
by the court. The patent term shall resume once the valid-
ity challenge is resolved. The court may award damages 
to the patent owner in a case in which another party 
brought a validity claim against the patent in bad faith.’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
SEC. 12. INJUNCTION. 
(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 283 of title 35, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(b) PERMANENT INJUNCTION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon a finding of infringe-
ment of a patent, the court shall presume that fur-
ther infringement of the patent would cause the pat-
ent owner irreparable harm. This presumption may 
be overcome only by a showing of clear and con-
vincing evidence by the infringing party that the 
patent owner would not be irreparably harmed by 
further infringement of the patent. The patent 
owner is not required to make or sell a product cov-
ered by the patent to show irreparable harm. 
‘‘(2) PATENT OWNER DEFINED.—In this sub-
section, a ‘patent owner’ means the owner of the 
patent or an exclusive licensee of the patent.’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that this section abrogates the Supreme Court’s rul-
ing in and subsequent lower court interpretations of eBay 
v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006), which has been 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
applied as a de facto presumption against granting patent 
owners injunctive relief. 
SEC. 13. BEST MODE REQUIREMENT. 
Section 15 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 
(Public Law 112–29), including each amendment made by 
such section, is repealed and any provision amended by 
such section shall be amended to read as in effect on the 
day before the date of the enactment of such Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:50 Oct 24, 2025
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5811.IH
H5811
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS