datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4781
One Hundred Third Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four
An Act
To facilitate obtaining foreign-located antitrust evidence by authorizing the Attorney
General of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission to provide,
in accordance with antitrust mutual assistance agreements, antitrust evidence
to foreign antitrust authorities on a reciprocal basis; and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Antitrust Enforce-
ment Assistance Act of 1994’’.
SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE TO A FOREIGN ANTITRUST AUTHORITY OF ANTI-
TRUST EVIDENCE.
In accordance with an antitrust mutual assistance agreement
in effect under this Act, subject to section 8, and except as provided
in section 5, the Attorney General of the United States and the
Federal Trade Commission may provide to a foreign antitrust
authority with respect to which such agreement is in effect under
this Act, antitrust evidence to assist the foreign antitrust author-
ity—
(1) in determining whether a person has violated or is
about to violate any of the foreign antitrust laws administered
or enforced by the foreign antitrust authority, or
(2) in enforcing any of such foreign antitrust laws.
SEC. 3. INVESTIGATIONS TO ASSIST A FOREIGN ANTITRUST AUTHOR-
ITY IN OBTAINING ANTITRUST EVIDENCE.
(a) REQUEST
FOR INVESTIGATIVE ASSISTANCE.—A request by
a foreign antitrust authority for investigative assistance under this
section shall be made to the Attorney General, who may deny
the request in whole or in part. No further action shall be taken
under this section with respect to any part of a request that has
been denied by the Attorney General.
(b) AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE.—In accordance with an anti-
trust mutual assistance agreement in effect under this Act, subject
to section 8, and except as provided in section 5, the Attorney
General and the Commission may, using their respective authority
to investigate possible violations of the Federal antitrust laws,
conduct investigations to obtain antitrust evidence relating to a
possible violation of the foreign antitrust laws administered or
enforced by the foreign antitrust authority with respect to which
such agreement is in effect under this Act, and may provide such
antitrust evidence to the foreign antitrust authority, to assist the
foreign antitrust authority—
(b) AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE.—In accordance
with an antitrust mutual assistance agreement in effect
under this Act, subject to section 8, and except as provided
in section 5, the Attorney General and the Commission
may, using their respective authority to investigate pos-
sible violations of the Federal antitrust laws, conduct in-
vestigations to obtain antitrust evidence relating to a pos-
sible violation of the foreign antitrust laws administered
or enforced by the foreign antitrust authority with respect
to which such agreement is in effect under this Act, and
may provide such antitrust evidence to the foreign anti-
trust authority, to assist the foreign antitrust authority—
(1) in determining whether a person has vio-
lated or is about to violate any of such foreign anti-
trust laws, or
(2) in enforcing any of such foreign antitrust
laws.
(c) SPECIAL SCOPE OF AUTHORITY.—An investiga-
tion may be conducted under subsection (b), and antitrust
evidence obtained through such investigation may be pro-
vided, without regard to whether the conduct investigated
violates any of the Federal antitrust laws.
(d) RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PRESERVED.—A per-
son may not be compelled in connection with an investiga-
tion under this section to give testimony or a statement,
or other thing, in any manner acceptable to such person
for use in an investigation by a foreign antitrust authority.
SEC. 5. LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORITY.
Sections 2, 3, and 4 shall not apply with respect to
the following antitrust evidence:
(1) Antitrust evidence that is received by the
Attorney General or the Commission under section
7A of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18a), as added by
title II of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improve-
ments Act of 1976. Nothing in this paragraph shall
affect the ability of the Attorney General or the
Commission to disclose to a foreign antitrust author-
ity antitrust evidence that is obtained otherwise than
under such section 7A.
(2) Antitrust evidence that is matter occurring
before a grand jury and with respect to which disclo-
sure is prevented by Federal law, except that for
purposes of this section and Rule 6(e)(3)(c)(i) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a judicial pro-
ceeding includes a judicial or administrative proceed-
ing of a foreign state or a regional economic integra-
tion organization under any of the foreign antitrust
laws of such foreign state or such organization.
(3) Antitrust evidence that is specifically au-
thorized under criteria established by Executive
Union Calendar No. 15 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 839 
[Report No. 112–31] 
A BILL 
To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization 
Act of 2008 to terminate the authority of the 
Secretary of the Treasury to provide new assist-
ance under the Home Affordable Modification 
Program, while preserving assistance to home-
owners who were already extended an offer to 
participate in the Program, either on a trial or 
permanent basis. 
MARCH 11, 2011 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:05 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H839.RH
H839
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 841 
To amend chapter 2 of title I of the United States Code to establish the 
style for amending laws. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011 
Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend chapter 2 of title I of the United States Code 
to establish the style for amending laws. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legislative Trans-
parency Act of 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. AMENDING LAWS. 
Chapter 2 of title 1 of the United States Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:51 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H841.IH
H841
pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
‘‘§ 115. Amending laws 
‘‘No Act shall be revised or amended by mere ref-
erence to it. Every bill or joint resolution which amends 
an existing section, subsection, or other subdivision of any 
Act shall set forth the section, subsection, or other subdivi-
sion sufficiently to enable the intent and effect of the bill 
or joint resolution to be clearly understood. The matter 
to be deleted shall be enclosed in brackets and any new 
matter added shall be in italics.’’. 
SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT. 
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 
of title 1 of the United States Code is amended by adding 
after the item relating to section 114 the following new 
item: 
‘‘115. Amending laws.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:51 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H841.IH
H841
pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
(2) the term ‘‘public road’’ has the meaning 
given such term in section 101(27) of title 23, 
United States Code. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:51 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H843.IH
H843
pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
under such agreement or such memorandum is
violated with respect to antitrust evidence, no-
tice of the violation will be given—
(i) by the foreign antitrust authority
promptly to the Attorney General or the
Commission with respect to antitrust evi-
dence provided by the Attorney General or
the Commission, respectively, and
(ii) by the Attorney General or the
Commission to the person (if any) that
provided such evidence to the Attorney
General or the Commission.
(3) The term ‘‘Attorney General’’ means the
Attorney General of the United States.
(4) The term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Federal
Trade Commission.
(5) The term ‘‘Federal antitrust laws’’ has the
meaning given the term ‘‘antitrust laws’’ in sub-
section (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15
U.S.C. 12(a)) but also includes section 5 of the Fed-
eral Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the
extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods
of competition.
(6) The term ‘‘foreign antitrust authority’’
means a governmental entity of a foreign state or of
a regional economic integration organization that is
vested by such state or such organization with au-
thority to enforce the foreign antitrust laws of such
state or such organization.
(7) The term ‘‘foreign antitrust laws’’ means
the laws of a foreign state, or of a regional economic
integration organization, that are substantially simi-
lar to any of the Federal antitrust laws and that
prohibit conduct similar to conduct prohibited under
the Federal antitrust laws.
(8) The term ‘‘person’’ has the meaning given
such term in subsection (a) of the first section of the
Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)).
(9) The term ‘‘regional economic integration or-
ganization’’ means an organization that is con-
stituted by, and composed of, foreign states, and on
which such foreign states have conferred sovereign
authority to make decisions that are binding on such
foreign states, and that are directly applicable to
and binding on persons within such foreign states,
including the decisions with respect to—
(A) administering or enforcing the foreign
antitrust laws of such organization, and
(B) prohibiting and regulating disclosure
of information that is obtained by such organi-
zation in the course of administering or enforc-
ing such laws.
SEC. 13. AUTHORITY TO RECEIVE REIMBURSEMENT.
The Attorney General and the Commission are au-
thorized to receive from a foreign antitrust authority, or
from the foreign state or regional economic integration or-
ganization represented by such foreign antitrust authority,
reimbursement for the costs incurred by the Attorney Gen-
eral or the Commission, respectively, in conducting an in-
vestigation under section 3 requested by such foreign anti-
trust authority, applying for an order under section 4 to
assist such foreign antitrust authority, or providing anti-
trust evidence to such foreign antitrust authority under
an antitrust mutual assistance agreement in effect under
this Act with respect to such foreign antitrust authority.
Passed the House of Representatives October 3,
1994.
Attest:
DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
Clerk.
HR 4781 RDS——2
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 844 
To allow an earlier start for State health care coverage innovation waivers 
under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011 
Mr. WELCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 
and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the juris-
diction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To allow an earlier start for State health care coverage 
innovation waivers under the Patient Protection and Af-
fordable Care Act. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering States 
to Innovate Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:53 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H844.IH
H844
pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. EARLIER START FOR STATE HEALTH CARE COV-
ERAGE INNOVATION WAIVERS. 
Section 1332(a) of the Patient Protection and Af-
fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18052(a)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘January 1, 
2017’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2014’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (4)(B)(ii), by inserting ‘‘begin-
ning not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of the Empowering States to Innovate 
Act’’ after ‘‘application’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:53 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H844.IH
H844
pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 420
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4781
[Report No. 103–722]
A BILL
To facilitate obtaining foreign-located antitrust evi-
dence by authorizing the Attorney General of the
United States and the Federal Trade Commis-
sion to provide, in accordance with antitrust mu-
tual assistance agreements, antitrust evidence to
foreign antitrust authorities on a reciprocal basis;
and for other purposes.
OCTOBER 3, 1994
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commit-
tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
ordered to be printed
IB
Union Calendar No. 420
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4781
[Report No. 103–772]
To facilitate obtaining foreign-located antitrust evidence by authorizing the
Attorney General of the United States and the Federal Trade Commis-
sion to provide, in accordance with antitrust mutual assistance agree-
ments, antitrust evidence to foreign antitrust authorities on a reciprocal
basis; and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 19, 1994
Mr. BROOKS (for himself and Mr. FISH) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
OCTOBER 3, 1994
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 19, 1994]
A BILL
To facilitate obtaining foreign-located antitrust evidence by
authorizing the Attorney General of the United States
and the Federal Trade Commission to provide, in accord-
ance with antitrust mutual assistance agreements, anti-
trust evidence to foreign antitrust authorities on a recip-
rocal basis; and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Antitrust
Enforcement Assistance Act of 1994’’.
SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE TO A FOREIGN ANTITRUST AUTHOR-
ITY OF ANTITRUST EVIDENCE.
In accordance with an antitrust mutual assistance
agreement in effect under this Act, subject to section 8, and
except as provided in section 5, the Attorney General of the
United States and the Federal Trade Commission may pro-
vide to a foreign antitrust authority with respect to which
such agreement is in effect under this Act, antitrust evi-
dence to assist the foreign antitrust authority—
(1) in determining whether a person has violated
or is about to violate any of the foreign antitrust laws
administered or enforced by the foreign antitrust au-
thority, or
(2) in enforcing any of such foreign antitrust
laws.
SEC. 3. INVESTIGATIONS TO ASSIST A FOREIGN ANTITRUST
AUTHORITY IN OBTAINING ANTITRUST EVI-
DENCE.
(a) REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATIVE ASSISTANCE.—A re-
quest by a foreign antitrust authority for investigative as-
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5154 
To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the 
Administrator of General Services to make rules to streamline and sim-
plify the registration system used by small business concerns, and for 
other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 17, 2014 
Mr. PETERS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Small Business 
A BILL 
To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Adminis-
tration and the Administrator of General Services to 
make rules to streamline and simplify the registration 
system used by small business concerns, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open Government 
Technology Work to More Businesses Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:30 Jul 22, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5154.IH
H5154
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
ing research and analysis on issues relating to the develop-
ment of public policy affecting Indians, the Institute shall
ensure that such research shall consider all factors affect-
ing Indian policy including the impact of such policy upon
other Americans.
(b) DATA
AND INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE.—
The Institute shall establish a data base to make acces-
sible information and data maintained by Government
agencies, academic institutions, and Indian and other or-
ganizations, and shall develop computer and telecommuni-
cation networks to make such information recoverable by
policy makers and the public. Where it is determined that
developing a new and specific data base is required, the
Institute shall undertake to meet such need.
(c) FORUMS
AND SYMPOSIA.—The Institute shall
conduct periodic public forums to identify and explore
emerging Indian policy issues and to identify needs for
data, information, or analyses, and shall conduct
symposia, when appropriate, to clarify options for policy
makers and to advance an understanding of complex and
interrelated public policy issues as they affect Indian peo-
ple and the formulation of Indian policy.
(d) PUBLIC INFORMATION.—(1) The Institute shall
publish and make available to the executive and legislative
branches of the Federal Government, tribal governments,
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 845 
To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national monuments 
in Montana, except by express authorization of Congress, and for other 
purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 1, 2011 
Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
monuments in Montana, except by express authorization 
of Congress, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Montana Land Sov-
ereignty Act’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:30 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H845.IH
H845
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NEW NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN 
MONTANA WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL AP-
PROVAL. 
This proviso of the last sentence of the first section 
of the Act of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 
950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is amended by inserting ‘‘or Mon-
tana’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON NEW WILD LANDS IN MONTANA 
WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL. 
The Bureau of Land Management shall not imple-
ment, administer, or enforce Secretarial Order No. 3310, 
issued by the Secretary of the Interior on December 22, 
2010, on any lands in Montana, except by Congressional 
approval. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:30 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H845.IH
H845
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4782
To amend section 217 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that military moving expense reimbursements are excluded from income
without regard to the deductibility of the expenses reimbursed.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 17, 1994
Mr. HEFLEY (for himself and Mr. DORNAN) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend section 217 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 to provide that military moving expense reimburse-
ments are excluded from income without regard to the
deductibility of the expenses reimbursed.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME OF MILITARY MOV-
ING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 217(b)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the definition of moving
expenses) is amended by striking ‘‘For’’ and inserting
‘‘Except as provided in subsection (g)(2), for’’.
(b) EXCLUSION.—Section 217(g)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to rules for deducting
moving expenses for members of the Armed Forces) is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) any moving and storage expenses—
‘‘(A) which are furnished in kind, or
‘‘(B) for which reimbursement or an allow-
ance is provided, but only to the extent of the
expenses paid or incurred,
to such member, the member’s spouse, or the mem-
ber’s dependents, shall not be includible in gross in-
come, without regard to whether the expenses reim-
bursed would otherwise be deductible under this sec-
tion, and’’.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendments made by this Act shall apply to ex-
penses incurred after December 31, 1993.
Æ
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 846 
To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national monuments 
in Idaho, except by express authorization of Congress, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 1, 2011 
Mr. LABRADOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
monuments in Idaho, except by express authorization 
of Congress, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Idaho Land Sov-
ereignty Act’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NEW NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN 
IDAHO 
WITHOUT 
CONGRESSIONAL 
AP-
PROVAL. 
This proviso of the last sentence of the first section 
of the Act of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:30 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H846.IH
H846
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
tribal colleges, and the public, the products of its research
and reports of other activities by disseminating informa-
tion about such research and reports as deemed appro-
priate by the Board.
(2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as prohibit-
ing any Indian tribal government from imposing any con-
dition, limitation, or other restriction on the use or dis-
semination of any information or other data made avail-
able by such tribal government to the Institute under this
Act.
SEC. 6. GENERAL POWERS OF INSTITUTE.
(a) POWERS OF INSTITUTE.—In carrying out the
provisions of this Act, the Institute shall have the power,
consistent with the provisions of this Act—
(1) to adopt, use and alter a corporate seal;
(2) to make, subject to the availability of funds,
agreements and contracts with persons, Indian tribal
governments, tribal organizations, and private or
governmental entities, and to make payments or ad-
vance payments under such agreements or contracts
without regard to the provisions of section 3324 of
title 31, United States Code;
(3) to sue and be sued in its corporate name
and to complain and defend in any court of com-
petent jurisdiction;
950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is amended by inserting ‘‘or Idaho’’ 
after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON NEW WILD LANDS IN IDAHO WITH-
OUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL. 
The Bureau of Land Management shall not imple-
ment, administer, or enforce Secretarial Order No. 3310, 
issued by the Secretary of the Interior on December 22, 
2010, on any lands in Idaho, except by Congressional ap-
proval. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:30 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H846.IH
H846
smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS