datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1615
To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of status
under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending
the deadline for classification petition and labor certification filings.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 26, 2001
Mr. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for
adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline
for classification petition and labor certification filings.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)(B)(i))
is amended by striking ‘‘April 30, 2001;’’ and inserting
‘‘April 30, 2002;’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact-
ment of the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (as en-
acted into law by Public Law 106–553).
Æ
‘‘PART D—EMPOWERING FUTURE
ENTREPRENEURS
‘‘SEC. 5401. SHORT TITLE AND FINDINGS.
‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This part may be cited as the
‘‘Future Entrepreneurs of America Act’’.
‘‘(b) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:
‘‘(1) In order to reach their career goals in our
dynamic American economy, young people need to
take personal responsibility to obtain the skills,
knowledge, constructive attitudes, and experiences
that will enable them to function as creative, self-
confident participants in the workforce.
‘‘(2) Research has found that 61 percent of
high school students are interested in starting their
own business and 75 percent of students believe it
is important for the Nation’s schools to teach more
about entrepreneurship and starting a business.
‘‘(3) States have begun to express increased in-
terest in entrepreneurship education. State edu-
cational leaders are recognizing that self-employment
is a viable career option for young people and are
exploring ways to better prepare them to own and
operate their own businesses.
‘‘(4) As part of a lifelong learning process, en-
trepreneurship education helps to increase the moti-
vation of young people to learn, helps them develop
I 
# 
107TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1619
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses applicable to individuals. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 26, 2001
Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
the limitation on capital losses applicable to individuals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES 
APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limita-
tion on capital losses for taxpayers other than corpora-
tions) is amended by striking ‘‘$3,000 ($1,500’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$8,250 ($4,125’’.
HR 1619 IH1S 
(b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Section 1211 of 
such Code (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(c) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 
year beginning in a calendar year after 2001, the 
$8,250 and $4,125 amounts contained in subsection 
(b)(1) shall each be increased by an amount equal 
to—
‘‘(i) such amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de-
termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal-
endar year in which the taxable year be-
gins by substituting ‘calendar year 2000’ 
for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph 
(B) thereof. 
‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—If any increase deter-
mined under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of 
$5, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
highest multiple of $5.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2000.
Æ
IB 
Union Calendar No. 458
107TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 1619
[Report No. 107–734] 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses applicable to individuals. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 26, 2001
Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
OCTOBER 10 (legislative day, OCTOBER 9), 2002
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
the limitation on capital losses applicable to individuals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Act and containing any related information that the Sec-
retary considers appropriate.
SEC. 9. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the following definitions
shall apply:
(1) EDUCATIONAL
ORGANIZATION.—The term
‘‘educational organization’’ means an entity—
(A) described in section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
(B) exempt from tax under section 501(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
(C) organized and operated for cultural,
literary, or educational purposes.
(2) HOLOCAUST
EDUCATION
PROGRAM.—The
term ‘‘Holocaust education program’’ means a pro-
gram that—
(A) has as its specific and primary purpose
to improve awareness and understanding of the
Holocaust; and
(B) to achieve such purpose, furnishes one
or more of the following:
(i) classes, seminars, or conferences.
(ii) educational materials.
(iii) teacher training.
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES 
APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limita-
tion on capital losses for taxpayers other than corpora-
tions) is amended by striking ‘‘$3,000 ($1,500’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$8,250 ($4,125’’. 
(b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Section 1211 of 
such Code (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(c) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 
year beginning in a calendar year after 2001, the 
$8,250 and $4,125 amounts contained in subsection 
(b)(1) shall each be increased by an amount equal 
to—
‘‘(i) such amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de-
termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal-
endar year in which the taxable year be-
gins by substituting ‘calendar year 2000’ 
for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph 
(B) thereof. 
‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—If any increase deter-
mined under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of
$5, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
highest multiple of $5.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2000.
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES 
APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation 
on capital losses for taxpayers other than corporations) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$3,000 ($1,500’’ and inserting 
‘‘$8,250 (1/2 such amount’’. 
(b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Section 1211 of 
such Code (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 
year beginning in a calendar year after 2002, the 
$8,250 amount contained in subsection (b)(1) shall 
each be increased by an amount equal to—
‘‘(A) such amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter-
mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year 
in which the taxable year begins by substituting
‘calendar year 2001’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in 
subparagraph (B) thereof. 
‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If any increase determined 
under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $50, such 
increase shall be rounded to the next highest multiple 
of $50.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 
section shall apply to taxable years beginning after Decem-
ber 31, 2001.
Union Calendar No. 458
107TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 1619
[Report No. 107–734] 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
increase the limitation on capital losses applica-
ble to individuals. 
OCTOBER 10 (legislative day, OCTOBER 9), 2002
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 161
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the $500,000
exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence shall apply to
certain sales by a surviving spouse.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. KOLBE, Ms.
MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. KING, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. BARR of Georgia,
Mrs. KELLY, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. TANCREDO, and Mr.
HORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that the $500,000 exclusion of gain on the sale of a
principal residence shall apply to certain sales by a sur-
viving spouse.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Surviving Spouse Fair-
ness Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. $500,000 EXCLUSION OF GAIN ON SALE OF PRIN-
CIPAL RESIDENCE BY SURVIVING SPOUSE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 121(d)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to property
of deceased spouse) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) PROPERTY OF DECEASED SPOUSE.—For
purposes of this section, in the case of an unmarried
individual whose spouse is deceased on the date of
the sale or exchange of property—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The period such un-
married individual owned and used such prop-
erty shall include the period such deceased
spouse owned and used such property before
death.
‘‘(B) $500,000 EXCLUSION
IN
CERTAIN
CASES.—At the election of such an unmarried
individual with respect to any property, sub-
section (b)(1) shall be applied by substituting
‘$500,000’ for ‘$250,000’ if—
‘‘(i) such individual is an unmarried
individual at all times after the date of
death of such deceased spouse and before
the date of the sale or exchange, and
‘‘(ii) the requirements of clauses (i),
(ii), and (iii) of subsection (b)(2)(A) would
have been met if such sale or exchange oc-
(d) MANAGEMENT ENTITY.—The Arabia Mountain
Heritage Area Alliance shall be the management entity for
the heritage area.
SEC. 5. AUTHORITIES AND DUTIES OF THE MANAGEMENT
ENTITY.
(a) AUTHORITIES.—For purposes of developing and
implementing the management plan, the management en-
tity may—
(1) make grants to, and enter into cooperative
agreements with, the State, political subdivisions of
the State, and private organizations;
(2) hire and compensate staff; and
(3) enter into contracts for goods and services.
(b) DUTIES.—
(1) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The management entity
shall develop and submit to the Secretary the
management plan.
(B) CONSIDERATIONS.—In developing and
implementing the management plan, the man-
agement entity shall consider the interests of
diverse governmental, business, and nonprofit
groups within the heritage area.
curred on such date of death (whether or
not such requirements were in effect as of
such date of death).
In the case of property with respect to which an
election under this subparagraph is in effect,
the basis of such property in the hands of such
unmarried individual shall be determined with-
out regard to section 1014.
‘‘(C) ELECTION.—The election under sub-
paragraph (B) shall be made not later than the
due date (including extensions) for the return
of tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable
year in which the sale occurred. Such an elec-
tion, once made, shall take effect as of such
date of death and may not be revoked without
the consent of the Secretary.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall take effect as if included in the amend-
ments made by section 312 of the Taxpayer Relief Act
of 1997.
Æ
‘‘(C) UNAVAILABILITY
OF
COUNSEL.—If
the counsel or representative of the law enforce-
ment officer is not available within 24 hours of
the time set for the commencement of any ques-
tioning of that officer, the investigating law en-
forcement agency shall grant a reasonable ex-
tension of time for the law enforcement officer
to obtain counsel or representation.
‘‘(2) REASONABLE
HOURS
AND
TIME.—Any
questioning of a law enforcement officer under inves-
tigation shall be conducted at a reasonable time
when the officer is on duty, unless exigent cir-
cumstances compel more immediate questioning, or
the officer agrees in writing to being questioned at
a different time, subject to the requirements of sub-
sections (e) and (f)(1).
‘‘(3) PLACE OF QUESTIONING.—Unless the offi-
cer consents in writing to being questioned else-
where, any questioning of a law enforcement officer
under investigation shall take place—
‘‘(A) at the office of the individual con-
ducting the investigation on behalf of the law
enforcement agency employing the officer under
investigation; or
with the resources and associated values of the herit-
age area.
SEC. 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.— There is authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this Act $10,000,000, to remain avail-
able until expended, of which not more than $1,000,000
may be used in any fiscal year.
(b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost
of any project or activity carried out using funds made
available under this Act shall not exceed 50 percent.
SEC. 9. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.
The authority of the Secretary to make any grant or
provide any assistance under this Act terminates on Sep-
tember 30, 2016.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1624
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage
under the Medicare Program of all oral anticancer drugs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 26, 2001
Ms. PRYCE of Ohio (for herself, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr.
BLUNT, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. EHRLICH,
and Mr. BENTSEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Com-
mittee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide
for coverage under the Medicare Program of all oral
anticancer drugs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Cancer
Therapies Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF ALL ANTICANCER ORAL
DRUGS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2)(Q) of the So-
cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(Q)) is amended
by striking ‘‘chemotherapeutic agent for a given indica-
tion,’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘agent for a medi-
cally accepted indication (as defined in subsection
(t)(2)(B));’’.
(b) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
1834(j)(5)(F)(iv) 
of 
such 
Act 
(42 
U.S.C.
1395m(j)(5)(F)(iv)) is amended by striking ‘‘therapeutic’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply with respect to drugs furnished
on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1627
To redesignate the Federal building located at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW, in the District of Columbia, and known as the Old Post Office
Pavilion, as the ‘‘Paul Leroy Robeson Old Post Office Pavilion’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 26, 2001
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To redesignate the Federal building located at 1100 Pennsyl-
vania Avenue, NW, in the District of Columbia, and
known as the Old Post Office Pavilion, as the ‘‘Paul
Leroy Robeson Old Post Office Pavilion’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PAUL LEROY ROBESON OLD POST OFFICE PA-
VILION.
(a) REDESIGNATION.—The Federal building located
at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in the District of Co-
lumbia, and known as the Old Post Office Pavilion, shall
be known and designated as the ‘‘Paul Leroy Robeson Old
Post Office Pavilion’’.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, regula-
tion, document, paper, map, or other record of the United
States to the Federal building referred to in subsection
(a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Paul Leroy
Robeson Old Post Office Pavilion.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4855 
To establish an Independent National Security Classification Board in the 
executive branch, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 19, 2004 
Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Mr. BOSWELL) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 
A BILL 
To establish an Independent National Security Classification 
Board in the executive branch, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent National 
Security Classification Board Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this Act is to establish in the execu-
tive branch an Independent National Security Classifica-
tion Board—
(1) to review the standards and procedures 
used in the classification system for national security 
information; 
(2) to propose and submit to Congress and the 
President for comment new standards and proce-
dures to be used in the classification system for such 
information; 
(3) to establish the new standards and proce-
dures after Congress and the President have had the 
opportunity to comment; and 
(4) to review, and make recommendations with 
respect to, classifications of current and new infor-
mation made under the applicable classification sys-
tem. 
SEC. 3. INDEPENDENT NATIONAL SECURITY CLASSIFICA-
TION BOARD. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Independent National 
Security Classification Board (in this Act referred to as 
the ‘‘Board’’) is established as an independent agency in 
the executive branch. 
(b) COMPOSITION.—The Board shall be composed of 
one member appointed by the President, one member 
jointly recommended by the Majority Leader and the Mi-
nority Leader of the Senate and appointed by the Presi-
dent, and one member jointly recommended by the Speak-
er of the House of Representatives and the Minority Lead-
er of the House of Representatives and appointed by the 
President, each by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate. Each member shall be knowledgeable on classifica-
tion matters. 
(c) TERM OF MEMBERS.—Each member of the Board 
shall be appointed for a term of 5 years. A member may 
be reappointed for one additional 5-year term. A member 
whose term has expired shall continue to serve on the 
Board until a replacement has been appointed. 
(d) VACANCIES.—Any vacancy in the Board shall not 
affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner 
as the original appointment. 
(e) SEPARATE OFFICE.—The Board shall have its 
own office for carrying out its activities, and shall not 
share office space with any element of the intelligence 
community or with any other department or agency of the 
Federal Government. 
(f) CHAIRMAN.—The Board shall select a Chairman 
from among its members. 
(g) MEETINGS.—The Board shall meet at the call of 
the Chairman. 
(h) QUORUM.—A majority of the members of the 
Board shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of 
members may hold hearings.
HR 1628 RFS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘El Camino Real de
los Tejas National Historic Trail Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that—
(1) El Camino Real de los Tejas (the Royal
Road to the Tejas), served as the primary route be-
tween the Spanish viceregal capital of Mexico City
and the Spanish provincial capital of Tejas at Los
Adaes (1721–1773) and San Antonio (1773–1821);
(2) the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early nine-
teenth century rivalries among the European colo-
nial powers of Spain, France, and England and after
their independence, Mexico and the United States,
for dominion over lands fronting the Gulf of Mexico,
were played out along the evolving travel routes in
this immense area;
(3) the future of several American Indian na-
tions, whose prehistoric trails were later used by the
Spaniards for exploration and colonization, was tied
to these larger forces and events and the nations
were fully involved in and affected by the complex
cultural interactions that ensued;
(4) the Old San Antonio Road was a series of
routes established in the early 19th century sharing
the same corridor and some routes of El Camino
IB
Union Calendar No. 69
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1628
[Report No. 107–124]
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate El Camino Real
de los Tejas as a National Historic Trail.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 26, 2001
Mr. RODRIGUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
JULY 10, 2001
Additional sponsors: Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. FROST, Mr. TURNER, Mr. BONIOR,
Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico
JULY 10, 2001
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union
and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate El
Camino Real de los Tejas as a National Historic Trail.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 162
To amend the Public Health Service Act, Employee Retirement Income Secu-
rity Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit
group and individual health plans from imposing treatment limitations
or financial requirements on the coverage of mental health benefits and
on the coverage of substance abuse and chemical dependency benefits
if similar limitations or requirements are not imposed on medical and
surgical benefits.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. STRICKLAND, Ms. KAPTUR,
Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ANDREWS, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs.
MORELLA, Mr. SHAYS, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. LEACH, Mr.
BOEHLERT, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr.
RAMSTAD, Mr. KLECZKA, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. STARK, Mr.
RUSH, Mr. NADLER, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr.
BALDACCI, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, and Mr. TIERNEY) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Com-
merce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and the Work-
force, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Public Health Service Act, Employee Retire-
ment Income Security Act of 1974, and the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit group and individual
health plans from imposing treatment limitations or fi-
nancial requirements on the coverage of mental health
benefits and on the coverage of substance abuse and