1239 
2161), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2201 and 2202(a) of 
that Act (135 Stat. 2166, 2167), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fis-
cal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2022 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Arizona ...........
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion Yuma ................
Combat Training 
Tank Complex .....
$29,300,000 
California .......
Naval Base Ventura 
County ......................
MQ–25 Aircraft 
Maintenance 
Hangar ................
$125,291,000 
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion Miramar ............
F–35 Centralized 
Engine Repair 
Facility ................
$31,400,000 
Marine Corps Base 
Camp Pendleton .......
CLB MEU Complex 
$83,900,000 
Marine Corps Base 
Camp Pendleton .......
Warehouse Replace-
ment ....................
$22,200,000 
District of Co-
lumbia .........
Marine Barracks Wash-
ington .......................
Family Housing Im-
provements ..........
$10,415,000 
Florida ...........
Marine Corps Support 
Facility Blount Is-
land ..........................
Lighterage and 
Small Craft Facil-
ity ........................
$69,400,000 
Hawaii ............
Marine Corps Base 
Kaneohe ...................
Electrical Distribu-
tion Moderniza-
tion ......................
$64,500,000 
South Carolina 
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion Beaufort ...........
Aircraft Mainte-
nance Hangar ......
$122,600,000 
Spain ..............
Naval Station Rota ......
EDI: Explosive Ord-
nance Disposal 
(EOD) Mobile 
Unit Facilities .....
$85,600,000
1240 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2303(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the installations or locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .................................
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 
$250,000,000 
Arkansas .............................
Ebbing Air National Guard Base
$73,000,000 
California ............................
Beale Air Force Base ....................
$148,000,000 
Vandenberg Space Force Base .....
$277,000,000 
Colorado ..............................
Buckley Space Force Base ............
$57,611,000 
Florida ................................
Cape Canaveral Space Force Sta-
tion.
$11,400,000 
Idaho ...................................
Mountain Home Air Force Base ..
$40,000,000 
Louisiana ............................
Barksdale Air Force Base ............
$22,000,000 
Massachusetts .....................
Hanscom Air Force Base ..............
$315,000,000 
Montana ..............................
Malmstrom Air Force Base ..........
$20,000,000 
North Carolina ...................
Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base 
$41,000,000 
Ohio ....................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
$45,000,000 
Oregon ................................
Mountain Home Air Force Base ..
$1,093,000,00 
South Dakota .....................
Ellsworth Air Force Base .............
$177,000,000 
Tennessee ...........................
Arnold Air Force Base ..................
$21,400,000 
Texas ..................................
Dyess Air Force Base ...................
$31,300,000 
Joint Base San Antonio ................
$684,000,000 
Laughlin Air Force Base ..............
$56,000,000 
Utah ....................................
Hill Air Force Base ......................
$258,000,000 
Virginia ...............................
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ............
$81,000,000 
Wyoming .............................
F.E. Warren Air Force Base ........
$1,581,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
1241 
tions in section 2303(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the installations or locations 
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Denmark .............................
Royal Danish Air Force Base 
Karup.
$110,000,000 
Federated States of Micro-
nesia.
Yap International Airport .............
$400,314,000 
Spain ...................................
Naval Station Rota .......................
$15,200,000 
United Kingdom .................
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ........
$185,000,000 
Royal Air Force Mildenhall ...........
$51,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2303(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may con-
struct or acquire family housing units (including land ac-
quisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or 
locations and in the amounts set forth in the following 
table: 
Air Force: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany ..................
Ramstein Air Base .......................................
$5,750,000
1242 
(b) IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS.—Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and 
available for military family housing functions as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $209,242,000. 
(c) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2303(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural 
and engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $6,557,000. 
SEC. 2303. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2024, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601.
1243 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under sections 2301 and 2302 
of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized 
to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2304. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FIS-
CAL YEAR 2017 PROJECT AT SPANGDAHLEM 
AIR BASE, GERMANY. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 
2688), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2902 of that Act (130 
Stat. 2743) and extended by section 2304 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (di-
vision B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 2169) and 
amended by section 2304(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of 
Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 721), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fis-
cal year 2026, whichever is later.
1244 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2017 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Germany .........
Spangdahlem Air Base 
ERI: F/A–22 Low 
Observable/Comp 
Repair Fac. .........
$12,000,000 
SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1817), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2903 of that Act (131 
Stat. 1876) and extended by section 2304(b) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 
(division B of Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat. 2980) and 
amended by section 2305(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of 
Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 722), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fis-
cal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows:
1245 
Air Force: Extension of 2018 Project Authorizations 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Hungary .........
Kecskemet Air Base ....
ERI: Airfield Up-
grades ..................
$12,900,000 
Kecskemet Air Base ....
ERI: Construct Par-
allel Taxiway .......
$30,000,000 
Kecskemet Air Base ....
ERI: Increase POL 
Storage Capacity
$12,500,000 
Slovakia ..........
Malacky ........................
ERI: Increase POL 
Storage Capacity
$20,000,000 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 
2240), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2903 of that Act (132 
Stat. 2287) and extended by section 2306(b) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 
(division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 724), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows:
1246 
Air Force: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
United King-
dom .............
Royal Air Force 
Fairford ....................
EDI: Construct 
DABS-FEV Stor-
age .......................
$87,000,000 
Royal Air Force 
Fairford ....................
EDI: Munitions 
Holding Area .......
$19,000,000 
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2020 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 
1862), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2301(a) and 2912(a) 
of that Act (133 Stat. 1867, 1913), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fis-
cal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2020 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Florida ...........
Tyndall Air Force Base 
Deployment Center/ 
Flight Line Din-
ing/AAFES ..........
$43,000,000 
New Mexico ....
Kirtland Air Force 
Base .........................
Combat Rescue Heli-
copter Simulator 
(CRH) ADAL .....
$15,500,000 
Texas ..............
Joint Base San Antonio 
BMT Recruit Dor-
mitory 8 ...............
$110,000,000
1247 
Air Force: Extension of 2020 Project Authorizations—Continued 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Washington ....
Fairchild-White Bluff ..
Consolidated TFI 
Base Operations ..
$31,000,000 
SEC. 2308. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FIS-
CAL YEAR 2021 PROJECT AT JOINT BASE 
LANGLEY-EUSTIS, VIRGINIA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 
4294), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2301(a) of that Act 
(132 Stat. 2287) and extended by section 2307(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 725), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2021 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Virginia ..........
Joint Base Langley- 
Eustis .......................
Access Control Point 
Main Gate With 
Land Acq .............
$19,500,000
1248 
SEC. 2309. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 
2161), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (135 
Stat. 2168), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever 
is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2022 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Australia ........
Royal Australian Air 
Force Base Darwin ..
Squadron Operations 
Facility ................
$7,400,000 
Royal Australian Air 
Force Base Tindal ...
Aircraft Mainte-
nance Support 
Facility ................
$6,200,000 
Royal Australian Air 
Force Base Tindal ...
Squadron Operations 
Facility ................
$8,200,000 
Massachusetts 
Hanscom Air Force 
Base .........................
NC3 Acquisitions 
Management Fa-
cility .....................
$66,000,000 
United King-
dom .............
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath ..............
F–35A Child Devel-
opment Center .....
$24,000,000 
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath ..............
F–35A Munition In-
spection Facility ..
$31,000,000 
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath ..............
F–35A Weapons 
Load Training 
Facility ................
$49,000,000
1249 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects inside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of De-
fense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State or Terri-
tory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................
Eielson Air Force Base ...............................
$14,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson .............
$55,000,000 
Arizona ....................
Marine Corps Air Station Yuma ................
$62,000,000 
California ...............
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton ..........
$96,410,000 
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training 
Center Bridgeport ...................................
$19,300,000 
Naval Base Coronado .................................
$51,000,000 
Colorado ..................
Fort Carson ................................................
$41,000,000 
Florida ....................
Hurlburt Field ............................................
$14,000,000 
Georgia ....................
Hunter Army Airfield .................................
$63,800,000 
Guam ......................
Joint Region Marianas ...............................
$929,224,000 
Missouri ..................
Whiteman Air Force Base ..........................
$19,500,000 
North Carolina ........
Fort Liberty ................................................
$11,800,000 
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune .............
$25,400,000 
South Carolina ........
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort ............
$31,500,000 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island 
$72,050,000 
Texas .......................
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi ...............
$79,300,000 
NSA Texas (NSAT) ...................................
$347,000,000 
Virginia ...................
Fort Belvoir ................................................
$225,000,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- 
Fort Story.
$32,000,000 
Pentagon .....................................................
$36,800,000 
Washington .............
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island .............
$54,000,000 
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport ..
$35,000,000
1250 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified 
in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of De-
fense may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Japan ..................
Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. But-
ler ...............................................................
$160,000,000 
Korea ..................
Kunsan Air Base ...........................................
$64,942,000 
United Kingdom
Royal Air Force Lakenheath .........................
$153,000,000 
SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CON-
SERVATION 
INVESTMENT 
PROGRAM 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for energy conserva-
tion projects as specified in the funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy con-
servation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
States Code, for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table:
1251 
ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ........................
Anniston Army Depot .........................
$56,450,000 
Delaware ......................
Major Joseph R. ‘‘Beau’’ Biden III 
National Guard/Reserve Center ......
$22,050,000 
Illinois ...........................
Rock Island Arsenal ............................
$70,480,000 
Indiana .........................
Camp Atterbury-Muscatatuck .............
$39,180,000 
Maine ............................
Naval Shipyard Portsmouth ...............
$28,700,000 
Maryland .......................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ...................
$30,730,000 
Joint Base Andrews ............................
$17,920,000 
New Jersey ...................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ....
$17,730,000 
Ohio ..............................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base .......
$53,000,000 
Washington ...................
Joint 
Base 
Lewis-McChord-Gray 
Army Airfield ..................................
$40,000,000 
Naval Magazine Indian Island ............
$39,490,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for energy conserva-
tion projects as specified in the funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy con-
servation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
States Code, for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain .........................
Naval Support Activity Bahrain .........
$15,330,000 
Greece ..........................
Naval Support Activity Souda Bay .....
$42,500,000 
Italy ..............................
Naval Air Station Sigonella ................
$13,470,000 
Japan ............................
Camp Fuji ...........................................
$45,870,000 
(c) IMPROVEMENT
OF CONVEYED UTILITY SYS-
TEMS.—In the case of a utility system that is conveyed 
under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, and 
that only provides utility services to a military installation, 
notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter169 and
1252 
chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code, the 
Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military depart-
ment may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the 
utility system to carry out the military construction 
projects set forth in the following table: 
Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems 
State 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Maryland ............
Aberdeen Proving Ground .............................
Power Generation 
and Microgrid 
Washington .........
Joint-Base Lewis-McChord Gray Army Air-
field ............................................................
Power Generation 
and Microgrid 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DE-
FENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2024, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the 
military departments), as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under sections 2401 and 2402 
of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized
1253 
to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FIS-
CAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT AT IWAKUNI, JAPAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1817), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2401(b) of that Act 
(131 Stat. 1829) and extended by section 2404 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2023 (division B of Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat.2984) 
and amended by section 2404 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of 
Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 728), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of 
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fis-
cal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2018 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Japan .............
Iwakuni ........................
PDI: Construct Bulk 
Storage Tanks 
PH 1 ...................
$30,800,000
1254 
SEC. 2405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FIS-
CAL YEAR 2019 PROJECT AT IWAKUNI, JAPAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 
2240), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2401(b) of that Act 
(132 Stat. 2250) and extended by section 2405(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 729), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2019 Project Authorization 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Japan .............
Iwakuni ........................
Fuel Pier .................
$33,200,000 
SEC. 2406. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT FIS-
CAL 
YEAR 
2020 
PROJECT 
AT 
FORT 
INDIANTOWN GAP, PENNSYLVANIA. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 
1862), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
1255 
section (b), as authorized pursuant to section 2402 of such 
Act (133 Stat. 1872), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
ERCIP Project: Extension of 2020 Project Authorization 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ..
Fort Indiantown Gap ...
Install Geothermal 
and 413 kW Solar 
Photovoltaic (PV) 
Array ...................
$3,950,000 
SEC. 2407. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2021 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 
4294), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2401(b) and 2402 of 
that Act (134 Stat. 4305, 4306) and extended by sections 
2406 and 2407 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118– 
31; 137 Stat. 730), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, 
whichever is later.
1256 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2021 
Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Arkansas ........
Ebbing Air National 
Guard Base ..............
PV Arrays and Bat-
tery Storage ........
$2,600,000 
California .......
Marine Corps Air 
Ground Combat Cen-
ter Twentynine 
Palms .......................
Install 10 Mw Bat-
tery Energy Stor-
age for Various 
Buildings .............
$11,646,000 
Naval Support Activity 
Monterey ..................
Cogeneration Plant 
at B236 ...............
$10,540,000 
Italy ................
Naval Support Activity 
Naples ......................
Smart Grid ..............
$3,490,000 
Japan .............
Def Fuel Support Point 
Tsurumi ...................
Fuel Wharf .............
$49,500,000 
SEC. 2408. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
FISCAL YEAR 2022 PROJECT AT JOINT BASE 
ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, DISTRICT OF COLUM-
BIA. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2402(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 
117–81; 135 Stat. 2174) for Joint Base Anacostia- 
Bolling, District of Columbia, for construction of PV car-
ports, the Secretary of Defense may install a 1.0-mega-
watt battery energy storage system for a total project 
amount of $40,650,000.
1257 
SEC. 2409. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 
2161), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2401 and 2402 of that 
Act (135 Stat. 2173, 2174), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2022 
Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Alabama .........
Fort Novosel (Formerly 
Fort Rucker) ............
10 MW RICE Gen-
erator Plant and 
Microgrid Con-
trols .....................
$24,000,000 
California .......
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion Miramar ............
Additional LFG 
Power Meter Sta-
tion ......................
$4,054,000 
Naval Air Weapons 
Station China Lake- 
Ridgecrest ................
Solar Energy Stor-
age System ..........
$9,120,000 
Georgia ...........
Fort Moore (Formerly 
Fort Benning) ..........
4.8 MW Generation 
and Microgrid ......
$17,593,000 
Fort Stewart ................
10 MW Generation 
Plant, with 
Microgrid Control 
$22,000,000 
Guam ..............
Polaris Point Sub-
marine Base .............
Inner Apra Harbor 
Resiliency Up-
grades Ph 1. ........
$38,300,000
1258 
Defense Agencies and ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2022 
Project Authorizations—Continued 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Michigan .........
Camp Grayling .............
650 KW Gas-Fired 
Micro-Turbine 
Generation Sys-
tem ......................
$5,700,000 
Mississippi ......
Camp Shelby ................
10 MW Generation 
Plant an Feeder 
level Microgrid 
System .................
$34,500,000 
Camp Shelby ................
Electrical Distribu-
tion Infrastruc-
ture Under-
grounding Hard-
ening Project .......
$11,155,000 
New York .......
Fort Drum ...................
Wellfield Field Ex-
pansion Project ...
$27,000,000 
North Carolina 
Fort Liberty (Formerly 
Fort Bragg) .............
10 MW Microgrid 
Utilizing Existing 
and New Genera-
tors ......................
$19,464,000 
Fort Liberty (Formerly 
Fort Bragg) .............
Emergency Water 
System .................
$7,705,000 
Ohio ................
Springfield-Beckley Mu-
nicipal Airport ..........
Base-Wide Microgrid 
With Natural Gas 
Generator, Photo-
voltaic and Bat-
tery Storage ........
$4,700,000 
Puerto Rico ....
Aguadilla ......................
Microgrid Control 
System, 460 KW 
PV, 275 KW Gen-
erator, 660 Kwh 
Bess .....................
$10,120,000 
Fort Allen ....................
Microgrid Control 
System, 690 KW 
PV, 275 KW Gen, 
570 Kwh Bess .....
$12,190,000 
Tennessee .......
Memphis International 
Airport .....................
PV Arrays and Bat-
tery Storage ........
$4,780,000 
United King-
dom .............
Royal Air Force 
Lakenheath ..............
Hospital Replace-
ment-Temporary 
Facilities ..............
$19,283,000 
Virginia ..........
National Geospatial-In-
telligence Agency 
Campus East ...........
Electrical System 
Redundancy .........
$5,299,000
1259 
TITLE XXV—INTERNATIONAL 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization 
Security 
Invest-
ment Program 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of con-
struction previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2024, for con-
tributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 
of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United 
States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization Security Investment Program authorized by 
section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 
4601.
1260 
Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind 
Contributions 
SEC. 2511. REPUBLIC OF KOREA FUNDED CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea 
for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of De-
fense may accept military construction projects for the in-
stallations or locations in the Republic of Korea, and in 
the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects 
Component 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Army ..............
Camp Carroll ......
MSC–K Paint Removal 
Booth .............................
$9,400,000 
Army ..............
Camp Carroll ......
Tactical Equipment Main-
tenance Facility 
(TEMF) ........................
$72,000,000 
Army ..............
Camp Walker ......
Elementary School ............
$46,000,000 
Army ..............
USAG Hum-
phreys .............
Embedded Behavioral 
Health Clinic .................
$10,000,000 
Army ..............
USAG Hum-
phreys .............
General Support Aviation 
Battalion Hangar ..........
$180,000,000 
Navy ...............
Chinhae ...............
Upgrade Main Access Con-
trol Point .......................
$9,200,000 
Air Force ........
Daegu AB ...........
Upgrade Water Distribu-
tion System ...................
$9,600,000 
Air Force ........
Kunsan AB .........
Combat Small Arms Range 
$31,000,000 
Air Force ........
Kunsan AB .........
Fighter Squadron and 
Fighter Generation 
Squadron Operations 
Facility ..........................
$46,000,000 
Air Force ........
Osan AB .............
Distributed Mission Oper-
ations (DMO) Flight 
Simulator .......................
$15,000,000 
SEC. 2512. REPUBLIC OF POLAND FUNDED CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Poland 
for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of De-
fense may accept military construction projects for the in-
1261 
stallations or locations in the Republic of Poland, and in 
the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Republic of Poland Funded Construction Projects 
Component 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Air Force ........
Lask AB .............
AT/FP Upgrades for PPI 
Mission ..........................
$22,000,000 
Air Force ........
Lask AB .............
Connecting Taxiways for 
RPA Mission .................
$18,000,000 
Air Force ........
Lask AB .............
Ground Comms and Data 
Support Area for RPA 
Mission ..........................
$5,000,000 
Air Force ........
Lask AB .............
Maintenance Hangar for 
PPI Mission ..................
$69,000,000 
Air Force ........
Lask AB .............
RPA Parking Apron .........
$18,000,000 
Air Force ........
Wroclaw AB .......
AT/FP Upgrades for 
APOD Mission ..............
$46,000,000 
Air Force ........
Wroclaw AB .......
Comms Infrastructure for 
APOD Mission ..............
$10,000,000 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army National Guard 
State or Terri-
tory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .................
Fort Richardson ..................................................................
$67,000,000 
Iowa ....................
Sioux City Armory ..............................................................
$13,800,000
1262 
Army National Guard—Continued 
State or Terri-
tory 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Louisiana ............
Lafayette Readiness Center ................................................
$33,000,000 
Mississippi ..........
Southaven Readiness Center ...............................................
$33,000,000 
Montana .............
Malta Readiness Center ......................................................
$14,800,000 
Nevada ...............
Hawthorne Army Depot ......................................................
$18,000,000 
New Jersey .........
Vineland ..............................................................................
$23,000,000 
Oklahoma ...........
Shawnee Readiness Center ..................................................
$29,000,000 
Puerto Rico ........
Gurabo Readiness Center ....................................................
$63,000,000 
Utah ...................
Nephi Readiness Center ......................................................
$20,000,000 
Washington ........
Camp Murray ......................................................................
$40,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army Reserve: Inside the United States 
State or Territory 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Amount 
California ......................................
Bell ...............................
$55,000,000 
Camp Parks .................
$42,000,000 
Georgia ...........................................
Dobbins Air Reserve 
Base.
$78,000,000 
Kentucky ........................................
Fort Knox ....................
$138,000,000 
Massachusetts .................................
Devens Reserve Forces 
Training Area.
$39,000,000 
New Jersey .....................................
Joint Base McGuire- 
Dix-Lakehurst.
$16,000,000 
Pennsylvania ...................................
Wilkes-Barre ................
$22,000,000 
Puerto Rico ....................................
Fort Buchanan ............
$39,000,000 
Virginia ...........................................
Richmond .....................
$23,000,000
1263 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
location inside the United States, and in the amount, set 
forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Amount 
Texas ..............................................
Naval Air Station Joint 
Reserve Base Fort 
Worth.
$75,000,000 
Washington ...................................
Joint Base Lewis- 
McChord.
$26,610,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Air National Guard locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table:
1264 
Air National Guard 
State 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Amount 
Alaska ...........................................
Joint Base Elmendorf- 
Richardson.
$19,300,000 
California ........................................
Moffett Air Field .........
$12,600,000 
Florida ............................................
Jacksonville Inter-
national Airport.
$26,200,000 
Hawaii ...........................................
Hickam Air Force Base 
$36,600,000 
New Jersey .....................................
Atlantic City Inter-
national Airport.
$18,000,000 
New York .......................................
Francis S. Gabreski 
Airport.
$14,000,000 
Texas ..............................................
Fort Worth ..................
$13,100,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Delaware .........................................
Dover Air Force Base ..
$42,000,000 
Georgia ..........................................
Dobbins Air Reserve 
Base.
$22,000,000 
Indiana ...........................................
Grissom Air Reserve 
Base.
$21,000,000 
Ohio ................................................
Youngstown Air Re-
serve Station.
$25,000,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2024, for the
1265 
costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, 
and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve 
Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 
1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost 
of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2607. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2020 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92; 133 
Stat. 1862), the authorizations set forth in the table in 
subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that Act 
(133 Stat. 1875), shall remain in effect until October 1, 
2025, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2026, which-
ever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2020 Project 
Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
California .......
Camp Roberts ..............
Automated Multi-
purpose Machine 
Gun (MPMG) 
Range ..................
$12,000,000 
Pennsylvania ..
Moon Township ............
Combined Support 
Maintenance Shop 
$23,000,000
1266 
SEC. 2608. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2021 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2021 (Division B of Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 
4294), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2601 and 2602 of that 
Act (134 Stat. 4312, 4313) and extended by section 2609 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2024 (division B of Public Law 118–31; 137 Stat. 
738), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2025, or the 
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for mili-
tary construction for fiscal year 2026, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2021 Project 
Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Arkansas ........
Fort Chaffee ................
National Guard 
Readiness Center
$15,000,000 
California .......
Bakersfield ...................
National Guard Ve-
hicle Maintenance 
Shop ....................
$9,300,000 
Massachusetts 
Devens Reserve Forces 
Training Area ..........
Automated Multi-
purpose Machine 
Gun Range ..........
$8,700,000 
North Carolina 
Asheville .......................
Army Reserve Cen-
ter ........................
$24,000,000 
Puerto Rico ....
Fort Allen ....................
National Guard 
Readiness Center
$37,000,000 
South Carolina 
Joint Base Charleston
National Guard 
Readiness Center
$15,000,000 
Texas ..............
Fort Worth ..................
Aircraft Mainte-
nance Hangar Ad-
dition/Alt .............
$6,000,000
1267 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2021 Project 
Authorizations—Continued 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Virgin Islands
St. Croix ......................
Army Aviation Sup-
port Facility 
(AASF) ................
$28,000,000 
St. Croix ......................
CST Ready Building 
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2609. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
FISCAL YEAR 2022 PROJECT FOR NATIONAL 
GUARD READINESS CENTER. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117– 
81; 135 Stat. 2178) for Bennington National Guard Ar-
mory, Vermont, for construction of a National Guard 
Readiness Center as specified in the funding table in sec-
tion 4601 of such Act, the Secretary of the Army may 
construct the National Guard Readiness Center in Lyn-
don, Vermont. 
SEC. 2610. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2022 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2022 (Division B of Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 
2161), the authorizations set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, 2604 and 
2605 of that Act (135 Stat. 2178, 2179, 2180) and
1268 
amended by section 2607(1) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of 
Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat. 2988), shall remain in ef-
fect until October 1, 2026, or the date of the enactment 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2027, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2022 Project 
Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Original Au-
thorized 
Amount 
Alabama .........
Huntsville Readiness 
Center ......................
National Guard 
Readiness Center 
$17,000,000 
Georgia ...........
Fort Moore (Formerly 
Fort Benning) ..........
Post-Initial Mil. 
Training Unac-
companied Hous-
ing .......................
$13,200,000 
Indiana ...........
Grissom Air Reserve 
Base .........................
Logistics Readiness 
Complex ...............
$29,000,000 
Massachusetts 
Barnes Air National 
Guard Base ..............
Combined Engine/ 
ASE/NDI Shop ...
$12,200,000 
Mississippi ......
Jackson International 
Airport .....................
Fire Crash and Res-
cue Station ..........
$9,300,000 
New York .......
Francis S. Gabreski 
Airport .....................
Base Civil Engineer 
Complex ...............
$14,800,000 
Ohio ................
Wright-Patterson Air 
Force Base ...............
AR Center Training 
Building/ UHS ....
$19,000,000 
Vermont .........
Bennington National 
Guard Armory ..........
National Guard 
Readiness Center
$16,900,000 
Wisconsin .......
Fort McCoy ..................
Transient Training 
Officer Barracks
$29,200,000 
Wyoming ........
Cheyenne Municipal 
Airport .....................
Combined Vehicle 
Maintenance and 
ASE Complex ......
$13,400,000
1269 
TITLE 
XXVII—BASE 
REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2024, for base 
realignment and closure activities, including real property 
acquisition and military construction projects, as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act 
of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 
10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 
2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
(division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140), as 
specified in the funding table in section 4601.
1270 
TITLE 
XXVIII—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION GENERAL PROVI-
SIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction 
Programs 
SEC. 2801. DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NAVAL 
INNOVATION CENTER AT THE NAVAL POST-
GRADUATE SCHOOL. 
Chapter 855 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 8551. Development and operation of the Naval In-
novation 
Center 
at 
the 
Naval 
Post-
graduate School 
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT THE NAVAL INNOVA-
TION CENTER.—(1) The Secretary of the Navy may enter 
into a contract or other agreement with one or more eligi-
ble nonprofit organizations for the design, construction, 
and maintenance of a multipurpose facility— 
‘‘(A) to be known as the ‘Naval Innovation Cen-
ter’ (in this section referred to as the ‘NIC’); and 
‘‘(B) to be located at the United States Naval 
Postgraduate School. 
‘‘(2) The NIC shall be used— 
‘‘(A) to convene interested persons to develop 
and accelerate the adoption of new and innovative
1271 
technologies and practices for the benefit of the De-
partment of Defense; and 
‘‘(B) to support such education, training, re-
search, and associated activities, as determined by 
the Secretary, in support of the Naval Postgraduate 
School and the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(b) FUNDS.—Under the contract or other agree-
ment described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may— 
‘‘(1) accept funds from a partner organization 
for any phase of development of the NIC; and 
‘‘(2) accept funds, personal property, or services 
from a covered entity that is not a partner organiza-
tion for maintenance of the NIC. 
‘‘(c) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GIFTS.—(1) The Sec-
retary of the Navy may accept, hold, administer, and 
spend any gift, device, or bequest of real property, per-
sonal property, services, or money on the condition that 
the gift, device, or bequest be used for the benefit, or in 
connection with, the establishment, operation, or mainte-
nance of the NIC. Section 2601 (other than subsections 
(b), (c), and (e)) of this title shall apply to gifts accepted 
under this subsection. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary may display at the NIC recogni-
tion for an individual or entity that contributes money to 
a partner organization or for a corporate partner that con-
1272 
tributes money directly to the Navy for the benefit of the 
NIC, whether or not the contribution is subject to the con-
dition that the recognition be provided. The Secretary 
shall prescribe regulations governing the circumstances 
under which contributor recognition may be provided, ap-
propriate forms of recognition, and suitable display stand-
ards. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary may authorize the sale of donated 
property received under paragraph (1). A sale under this 
paragraph need not be conducted in accordance with dis-
posal requirements that would otherwise apply, so long as 
the sale is conducted at arms-length and includes an 
auditable transaction record. 
‘‘(4) Any money received under paragraph (1) and 
any proceeds from the sale of property under paragraph 
(3) shall be deposited into a fund established in the Treas-
ury to support the NIC. 
‘‘(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 
Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms 
and conditions in connection with a contract or other 
agreement described in subsection (a) as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States. 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
1273 
‘‘(1) The term ‘eligible nonprofit organization’ 
means an organization that — 
‘‘(A) is described in section 501(c)(3) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and that is 
exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of 
such Code; and 
‘‘(B) has as its primary purpose the sup-
port and operation of the Naval Postgraduate 
School. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘partner organization’ means an 
eligible nonprofit organization with which the Sec-
retary of the Navy enters into a contract or other 
agreement under subsection (a). 
‘‘(3) The term ‘covered entity’ means— 
‘‘(A) an entity incorporated or operating 
under the laws of any State; or 
‘‘(B) a nonprofit organization.’’. 
SEC. 2802. ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE 
PROJECTS AND SERVICES. 
Section 2391(b)(5)(B) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by insert-
ing ‘‘or local government’’ after ‘‘a State’’; 
(2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;
1274 
(3) in clause (iii), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new 
clause: 
‘‘(iv) to support public infrastructure 
projects and services that enhance the capabili-
ties and resilience of the defense industrial base 
and the defense industrial base workers, if the 
Secretary determines such support will improve 
operations of the Department of Defense.’’. 
SEC. 2803. MILITARY BASE REUSE STUDIES AND COMMU-
NITY PLANNING ASSISTANCE. 
Section 2391 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(5)(D) by adding at the 
end the following: ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall 
coordinate with the Commandant of the Coast 
Guard before providing assistance under this para-
graph for Coast Guard installations and facilities 
that, for purposes of this paragraph, are military in-
stallations.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (e)(1) by adding at the end 
the following: ‘‘For purposes of paragraphs (1)(E) 
and (5)(D) of subsection (b), the term ‘military in-
1275 
stallation’ includes Coast Guard installations and fa-
cilities’’. 
SEC. 2804. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBLE GRANT RECIPIENTS 
UNDER THE DEFENSE COMMUNITY INFRA-
STRUCTURE PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 2391 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘State and 
local governments’’ and inserting ‘‘State govern-
ments, local governments, and not-for-profit, mem-
ber-owned utility services’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘the 
State or local government agree’’ and inserting 
‘‘the recipient of such assistance agrees’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) in the matter preceding clause (i), 
by striking ‘‘in a rural area or the Sec-
retary of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘in a 
rural area or a covered insular area, or if 
the Secretary of Defense’’; 
(ii) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘a State 
or local government’’ and inserting ‘‘the 
recipient of assistance under this sub-
section’’; and
1276 
(iii) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘a State 
or local government contribution’’ and in-
serting ‘‘the contribution of such recipi-
ent’’. 
(b) COVERED INSULAR AREA DEFINED.—Subsection 
(e) of such section is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(7) The term ‘covered insular area’ means the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, 
Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and the Virgin Islands.’’. 
(c) 
TECHNICAL
AMENDMENT.—Section 
2391(d)(1)(B)(iii) of such title is amended by striking 
‘‘section 101(e)(8) of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘section 101 
of this title’’. 
SEC. 2805. AMENDMENTS TO DEFENSE LABORATORY MOD-
ERNIZATION PROGRAM. 
Section 2805(g) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(5), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$150,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$300,000,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(6)(B), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$1,000,0000’’ and inserting ‘‘$4,000,0000’’.
1277 
SEC. 2806. ANNUAL FIVE-YEAR PLANS ON IMPROVEMENT 
OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INNOVATION 
INFRASTRUCTURE. 
Section 2810 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(e) ANNUAL FIVE-YEAR PLANS ON IMPROVEMENT 
OF INNOVATION INFRASTRUCTURE.— 
‘‘(1) SUBMISSION.—Along with the budget for 
each fiscal year submitted by the President pursuant 
to section 1105(a) of title 31, each Secretary of a 
military department and the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a plan that describes the objectives of that Secretary 
to improve innovation infrastructure during the five 
fiscal years following the fiscal year for which such 
budget is submitted. 
‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—Each plan submitted by a 
Secretary of a military department under paragraph 
(1) shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) With respect to the five-year period 
covered by the plan, an identification of the 
major lines of effort, milestones, and investment 
goals of the Secretary over such period relating 
to the improvement of innovation infrastructure
1278 
and a description of how such goals support 
such goals, including the use of— 
‘‘(i) military construction, facilities 
restoration and modernization funds; 
‘‘(ii) the defense lab modernization 
program under section 2805(d) of this 
title; and 
‘‘(iii) military construction projects for 
innovation, research, development, test, 
and evaluation under this section. 
‘‘(B) The estimated costs of necessary in-
novation infrastructure improvements and a de-
scription of how such costs would be addressed 
by the Department of Defense budget request 
submitted during the same year as the plan and 
the applicable future-years defense program. 
‘‘(C) Information regarding the plan of the 
Secretary to initiate such environmental and en-
gineering studies as may be necessary to carry 
out planned innovation infrastructure improve-
ments. 
‘‘(D) Detailed information regarding how 
innovation infrastructure improvement projects 
will be paced and sequenced to ensure contin-
uous operations.
1279 
‘‘(3) INCORPORATION
OF
RESULTS-ORIENTED 
MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES.—Each plan under sub-
section (a) shall incorporate the leading results-ori-
ented management practices identified in the report 
of the Comptroller General of the United States ti-
tled ‘Actions Needed to Improve Poor Conditions of 
Facilities and Equipment that Affect Maintenance 
Timeliness and Efficiency’ (GAO–19–242), or any 
successor report, including— 
‘‘(A) analytically based goals; 
‘‘(B) results-oriented metrics; 
‘‘(C) the identification of required re-
sources, risks, and stakeholders; and 
‘‘(D) regular reporting on progress to deci-
sion makers. 
‘‘(4) 
INNOVATIVE
INFRASTRUCTURE
DE-
FINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘innovation in-
frastructure’ includes laboratories, test and evalua-
tion ranges, and any other infrastructure whose pri-
mary purpose is research, development, test, and 
evaluation.’’.
1280 
SEC. 2807. EXPANSION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 
PROJECTS FOR INSTALLATION AND DEFENSE 
ACCESS ROAD RESILIENCE; MODIFICATION 
OF PROJECT PRIORITIES. 
Section 2815a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 
the end; 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe-
riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(3) providing water storage and filtration, 
flood mitigation, or otherwise supporting water resil-
ience at military installations.’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), 
and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respec-
tively; and 
(B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the 
following: 
‘‘(5) A military installation resilience project 
under section 2684a of this title.’’; 
(3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 
following:
1281 
‘‘(c) PROJECT PRIORITIES.—In selecting stormwater 
management projects to be carried out under this section, 
the Secretary concerned shall give a priority to project 
proposals for— 
‘‘(1) minimizing the runoff of untreated 
stormwater into freshwater systems or tidal systems; 
‘‘(2) protecting military installations and de-
fense access roads from stormwater runoff and 
water levels resulting from extreme weather condi-
tions; and 
‘‘(3) supporting water resilience at military in-
stallations.’’; 
(4) in subsection (d)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 
(3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘, retention, and filtra-
tion’’ after ‘‘water-slowing’’; and 
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 
following: 
‘‘(2) The capture or storage of stormwater for 
use in supporting water resilience at a military in-
stallation.’’; and 
(5) in subsection (e)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘In the case of’’ and in-
serting ‘‘(1) In the case of’’;
1282 
(B) by striking ‘‘section 2391(d),’’ and in-
serting ‘‘section 2391, 2684,’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(2) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, 
Installations, and Environment shall designate an official 
to be responsible for coordinating regional stormwater 
management among the military departments.’’. 
SEC. 2808. EXPANSION OF AUTHORIZED THRESHOLD FOR 
CERTAIN MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS WITHIN AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY 
OF UNITED STATES INDO-PACIFIC COMMAND. 
Subsection (a) of section 2810 of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (Public Law 
118–31) is amended by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$20,000,000’’. 
SEC. 2809. NOTIFICATION TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FOR 
AWARDS OF CONTRACTS FOR MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION PROJECTS. 
(a) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 
days after the date of award of a contract for a military 
construction project, the Secretary of the military depart-
ment that has jurisdiction over such project shall notify 
any applicable Member of Congress representing the 
State—
1283 
(1) in which such contract will be performed; or 
(2) for which the contractor awarded such con-
tract is a constituent of such Member. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—A notification under subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) The proposed value of the contract. 
(2) The contractor awarded the contract. 
(3) A brief description of the project that is the 
subject of the contract, including the location in 
which the contract will be performed. 
SEC. 2810. ASSESSMENT OF WORKFORCE NEEDS IN THE 
FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES TO SUPPORT 
FUTURE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment shall 
conduct a study and submit a report to the congressional 
defense committees— 
(1) summarizing planned military major and 
minor construction in the Freely Associated States 
(‘‘FAS’’) over the next 5 fiscal years; 
(2) assessing the ability of the local workforce 
in the FAS to support future military construction; 
and
1284 
(3) detailing options for the Department of De-
fense to cooperate with the Department of Labor, 
the Department of the Interior, and the FAS to de-
velop plans to help address any construction work-
force shortages. 
Subtitle B—Military Housing 
Reforms 
SEC. 2821. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY FOR WAIVERS OF 
COVERED 
PRIVACY 
AND 
CONFIGURATION 
STANDARDS FOR COVERED MILITARY UNAC-
COMPANIED HOUSING. 
Paragraph (4) of section 2856a(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘9 months’’ and in-
serting ‘‘18 months’’. 
SEC. 2822. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DATABASE OF 
COMPLAINTS MADE REGARDING HOUSING 
UNITS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
Section 2894a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘regarding 
housing units’’ and inserting ‘‘by a tenant regarding 
covered dwelling units’’; 
(2) in subsections (c) and (d) by striking ‘‘hous-
ing unit’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘cov-
ered dwelling unit’’; and
1285 
(3) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol-
lowing new subsections: 
‘‘(f) ANNUAL REPORT.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Deputy Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Housing shall submit to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Senate, and make available to 
each Secretary of a military department, an annual 
report that includes, during the year covered by such 
report— 
‘‘(A) a summary of the data collected 
using the database established under subsection 
(a); 
‘‘(B) an aggregation of the complaints cat-
egorized by type, in accordance with paragraph 
(2), and military installation, if applicable; and 
‘‘(C) the actions taken to remedy com-
plaints received during the period covered by 
such report. 
‘‘(2) TYPE
OF
COMPLAINTS.—In categorizing 
complaints by type pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), 
the Secretary shall aggregate complaints based on 
the following categories: 
‘‘(A) 
Physiological 
hazards, 
including 
dampness and mold growth, lead-based paint,
1286 
asbestos 
and 
manmade 
fibers, 
radiation, 
biocides, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic 
compounds. 
‘‘(B) Psychological hazards, including ease 
of access by unlawful intruders, faulty locks or 
alarms, and lighting issues. 
‘‘(C) Safety hazards. 
‘‘(D) Maintenance timeliness. 
‘‘(E) Maintenance quality. 
‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘covered armed force’ means the 
Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Space 
Force. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘covered dwelling unit’ means a 
unit of accompanied family housing, unaccompanied 
housing, or barracks— 
‘‘(A) in which a member of a covered 
armed force resides; and 
‘‘(B) that such member does not own. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘tenant’ means any of the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(A) A member of a covered armed force 
who resides in a covered dwelling unit.
1287 
‘‘(B) A dependent of a member described 
in subparagraph (A) who resides in a covered 
dwelling unit.’’. 
SEC. 2823. MODIFICATION TO DEFINITION OF PRIVATIZED 
MILITARY HOUSING. 
Section 3001(a)(2) of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 10 
U.S.C. 2821 note) is amended by striking ‘‘military hous-
ing provided’’ and inserting ‘‘military housing that is not 
Government-owned that is provided’’. 
SEC. 2824. ANALYSIS OF HOUSING AVAILABILITY FOR CRIT-
ICAL 
CIVILIAN 
AND 
CONTRACTOR 
PER-
SONNEL NEAR RURAL MILITARY INSTALLA-
TIONS. 
Not later than one year after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the 
Department of Defense Manual 4165.63–M titled ‘‘DoD 
Housing Management’’ issued October 28, 2010, to re-
quire an analysis of the availability of suitable housing lo-
cated in close proximity to a military installation (as de-
fined in section 2801 of title 10, United States Code) in 
a rural location for civilian personnel and defense contrac-
tors that provide critical functions for the operations of 
such military installation, as determined by the Secretary.
1288 
SEC. 2825. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAVEL 
UNTIL ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN COM-
PLAINT DATABASE. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2025, and 
available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for 
the travel of persons, not more than 90 percent may be 
obligated or expended until the date on which the Sec-
retary of Defense implements the public complaint data-
base for military housing under the jurisdiction of such 
Secretary required by section 2894a of title 10, United 
States Code. 
Subtitle C—Real Property and 
Facilities Administration 
SEC. 2831. PROCESS FOR STRATEGIC BASING ACTIONS FOR 
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE. 
Chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 2391 the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 2392. Process for strategic basing actions for the 
Department of the Air Force 
‘‘(a) BASING ACTION REQUESTS.—(1) An action pro-
ponent desiring the Secretary of the Air Force to under-
take a basing action shall submit to the Assistant Sec-
1289 
retary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and En-
vironment a basing action request. 
‘‘(2) The Assistant Secretary shall coordinate with 
the Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategy and Requirements 
of the Air Force on the assessment and resolution of a 
basing action request. 
‘‘(b) ASSESSMENT OF BASING ACTION REQUEST.— 
(1) The Assistant Secretary shall assess a request sub-
mitted under subsection (a) to determine whether the bas-
ing action described in such request is a strategic basing 
action. 
‘‘(2) Not later than 14 days after the Assistant Sec-
retary makes a determination with respect to such a bas-
ing action, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Represent-
atives and the Senate a notification of such determination. 
‘‘(3)(A) Upon determining that a basing action de-
scribed in a request submitted under subsection (a) is a 
strategic basing action, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
not carry out such strategic basing action pursuant to the 
process established for a programmatic basing decision (as 
described in subsection (h)) until the Secretary notifies the 
congressional defense committees of the determination to 
use a programmatic basing decision process for such bas-
ing action request.
1290 
‘‘(B) Upon designation of a Strategic Basing Lead 
for a basing action request submitted under subsection 
(a), the Secretary of the Air Force may not implement 
such request pursuant to the processes established for a 
programmatic basing decision (as described in subsection 
(h)). 
‘‘(c) CRITERIA FOR STRATEGIC BASING ACTION.— 
(1)(A) Upon determining that a basing action described 
in a request submitted under subsection (a) is a strategic 
basing action, the Assistant Secretary shall designate a 
Strategic Basing Lead to, for each such request— 
‘‘(i) develop a list of military installations 
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 
Air Force at which the strategic basic action 
may be implemented; 
‘‘(ii) develop criteria to determine the suit-
ability of each military installation on such list 
for the strategic basing action, including cri-
teria relating to mission requirements, capacity 
of each military installation to support the stra-
tegic basing action, environmental consider-
ations, and cost; 
‘‘(iii) assign a weight to each criteria devel-
oped under clause (ii); and
1291 
‘‘(iv) if required, request modifications of 
the criteria or weight of criteria from the Stra-
tegic Basing Panel. 
‘‘(B) The Strategic Basing Lead shall submit to the 
Strategic Basing Panel a report containing the informa-
tion described in subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after receipt of the 
report required under paragraph (1), the Strategic Basing 
Panel shall review such report and make a determination 
whether to approve or reject the list of military installa-
tions, the criteria developed, and the weights assigned 
such criteria under such paragraph. 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Panel rejects such list, 
criteria, or weights, the Assistant Secretary shall require 
the Strategic Basing Lead to redevelop such list, redevelop 
such criteria, or reassign such weights (as appropriate) 
and submit the modified criteria or weights to the Stra-
tegic Basing Panel for a subsequent review to be con-
ducted in accordance with subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Lead to redevelop such list, redevelop such criteria, 
or reassign such weights (as appropriate). 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Panel shall submit to the 
Strategic Basing Group a report that includes the ap-
1292 
proved list of military installations, criteria developed, and 
weights assigned such criteria. 
‘‘(3)(A) The Strategic Basing Group shall review the 
report submitted under paragraph (2)(D) and submit to 
the Assistant Secretary a determination of whether to ap-
prove or reject such report. 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Group rejects the inclu-
sion of a military installation, the criteria developed, or 
the weights assigned such criteria in the report, the Assist-
ant Secretary shall require the Strategic Basing Panel to 
submit to the Strategic Basing Group a modified report 
for a subsequent review to be conducted in accordance 
with subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Panel to submit to the Strategic Basing Group a 
modified report. 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Group shall submit to the 
Assistant Secretary a report that includes the approved 
list of military installations, criteria developed, and 
weights assigned such criteria. 
‘‘(4) Not later than 14 days after the date of receipt 
of the report under paragraph (3)(D), the Assistant Sec-
retary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services
1293 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing 
on— 
‘‘(A) the work of the Strategic Basing Lead; 
‘‘(B) the list of military installations under the 
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Air Force at 
which the strategic basic action may be imple-
mented; and 
‘‘(C) the criteria developed under paragraph 
(1)(A) and the weight assigned to such criteria, as 
approved by the Strategic Basing Group. 
‘‘(5)(A) If the Strategic Basing Lead modifies the list 
of military installations, the criteria developed, or the 
weight assigned to such criteria under paragraph (1), or 
requests a modification pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(iv), 
after the date of the briefing required under paragraph 
(4), the Strategic Basing Lead shall submit to the Stra-
tegic Basing Panel a report describing such modifications. 
‘‘(B) The Assistant Secretary shall— 
‘‘(i) notify the Committees on Armed Services 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate of 
any modifications made by the Strategic Basing 
Lead as described in subparagraph (A); 
‘‘(ii) require the Strategic Basing Lead to sub-
mit such modifications to the Strategic Basing Panel
1294 
for subsequent review to be conducted in accordance 
with paragraph (2); 
‘‘(iii) require the Strategic Basing Panel to sub-
mit approved modifications to the Strategic Basing 
Group for subsequent review to be conducted in ac-
cordance with paragraph (3); and 
‘‘(iv) provide to the Committees on Armed Serv-
ices of the House of Representatives and the Senate 
a briefing on such modifications approved by the 
Strategic Basing Group. 
‘‘(d) LIST OF PROPOSED MILITARY INSTALLATIONS 
FOR SITE VISITS.—(1)(A) After reviewing the relevant in-
formation provided by the appropriate commanders of 
military installations and commanders of tenant or other 
relevant activities with respect to the report approved by 
the Strategic Basing Group under subsection (c), the Stra-
tegic Basing Lead shall— 
‘‘(i) determine which military installations 
in such report are the most suitable for a site 
survey; and 
‘‘(ii) complete a scorecard for each military 
installation, using the criteria developed under 
subsection (c)(1)(A), to evaluate the suitability 
of each military installation for implementing 
the strategic basing decision.
1295 
‘‘(B) The Strategic Basing Lead shall submit to the 
Strategic Basing Panel a report containing the informa-
tion described in subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after receipt of the 
report required under paragraph (1), the Strategic Basing 
Panel shall review such report and submit to the Strategic 
Basing Group a determination of which military installa-
tions in such report are most suitable for a site survey. 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Panel rejects the inclu-
sion of a military installation under the review required 
under subparagraph (A), the Assistant Secretary shall re-
quire the Strategic Basing Lead to submit to the Strategic 
Basing Panel a modified list of military installations for 
a subsequent review to be conducted in accordance with 
subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Lead to submit to the Strategic Basing Panel a 
modified list of military installations. 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Panel shall submit to the 
Strategic Basing Group a report that includes the ap-
proved list of military installations and the relevant score-
cards for such military installations. 
‘‘(3)(A) The Strategic Basing Group shall review the 
report submitted under paragraph (2)(D) and submit to
1296 
the Assistant Secretary a determination of which military 
installations on the list are most suitable for a site survey. 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Group rejects the inclu-
sion of a military installation under the review required 
under subparagraph (A), the Assistant Secretary shall re-
quire the Strategic Basing Panel to submit to the Stra-
tegic Basing Group a modified list of military installations 
for a subsequent review to be conducted in accordance 
with subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Panel to submit to the Strategic Basing Group a 
modified list of military installations. 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Group shall submit to the 
Assistant Secretary a report that includes the approved 
list of military installations and the relevant scorecards 
for such military installations. 
‘‘(4) Not later than 14 days after the date of receipt 
of the report under paragraph (3)(D), the Assistant Sec-
retary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing 
on such report that includes the relevant scorecards for 
each military installation included in such report.
1297 
‘‘(5) After providing the briefing described in para-
graph (4), the Assistant Secretary shall make the list de-
scribed in such paragraph publicly available. 
‘‘(e) RECOMMENDATION OF A MILITARY INSTALLA-
TION.—(1) The Strategic Basing Lead shall conduct a site 
survey at each military installation included on the list ap-
proved by the Strategic Basing Group in the report de-
scribed in subsection (d)(3)(D). 
‘‘(2) Not later than 60 days after the completion of 
all site surveys, the Strategic Basing Lead shall submit 
to the Strategic Basing Panel a report containing the re-
sults of each such survey, including— 
‘‘(A) an updated scorecard described in sub-
section (d)(1)(a)(ii) for each military installation 
using information from the site survey for such in-
stallation; and 
‘‘(B) a comprehensive cost evaluation of imple-
menting the strategic basing action at each such 
military installation. 
‘‘(3)(A) Not later than 30 days after receipt of the 
report required under paragraph (2), the Strategic Basing 
Panel shall review such report and submit to the Strategic 
Basing Group a report that includes— 
‘‘(i) a recommendation of a single military in-
stallation from the report as the most suitable for
1298 
implementation of the strategic basing action, and a 
list of any reasonable alternatives; and 
‘‘(ii) data on each military installation for which 
a site survey was conducted under paragraph (1), in-
cluding the updated scorecard described in para-
graph (2)(A). 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Panel cannot rec-
ommend a single military installation under the review re-
quired under subparagraph (A), the Assistant Secretary 
shall require the Strategic Basing Lead to submit to the 
Strategic Basing Panel a modified scorecard and cost eval-
uation for each military installation for a subsequent re-
view to be conducted in accordance with subparagraph 
(A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Lead to submit to the Strategic Basing Panel a 
modified scorecard and cost evaluation. 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Panel shall submit to the 
Strategic Basing Group a report that includes the rec-
ommendation of a single military installation and the rel-
evant scorecard for such military installation. 
‘‘(4)(A) The Strategic Basing Group shall evaluate 
the single military installation from the report required 
under paragraph (3)(D) and determine whether or not to
1299 
recommend to the Assistant Secretary implementation of 
the strategic basing action at such installation. 
‘‘(B) If the Strategic Basing Group cannot rec-
ommend implementing the strategic basing action at such 
military installation, the Assistant Secretary shall require 
the Strategic Basing Panel to submit to the Strategic Bas-
ing Group a modified scorecard and cost evaluation for 
another military installation included in the report sub-
mitted under paragraph (2) for a subsequent review to be 
conducted in accordance with subparagraph (A). 
‘‘(C) There shall be no limitation on the number of 
times the Assistant Secretary may require the Strategic 
Basing Panel to submit to the Strategic Basing Group a 
modified scorecard and cost evaluation. 
‘‘(D) The Strategic Basing Group shall submit to the 
Assistant Secretary a report that includes a recommenda-
tion of a single military installation for implementation of 
the strategic basing action, and a list of any reasonable 
alternatives. 
‘‘(5) The Assistant Secretary shall submit to the Sec-
retary of the Air Force an analysis of the recommendation 
of a single military installation for implementation of the 
strategic basing action made by the Strategic Basing 
Group, including all relevant data and a list of any reason-
able alternatives.
1301 
announce the military installation at which such strategic 
basing action will be implemented. 
‘‘(2) No amounts may be obligated or expended, and 
no personnel, equipment, or other resources of the Depart-
ment of Defense may be detailed, transferred, obligated, 
or assigned to implement a strategic basing action under 
this section until the date on which the Secretary of the 
Air Force makes the public announcement described in 
paragraph (1). 
‘‘(g) APPLICABILITY.—This section and the require-
ments of this section shall apply to a basing action request 
submitted on or after the date of the enactment of this 
section. 
‘‘(h) REQUIREMENTS FOR PROGRAMMATIC BASING 
DECISIONS.—(1) The Assistant Secretary may not make 
a programmatic basing decision (as described in chapter 
7 of the Department of the Air Force Instruction 10–503 
issued June 12, 2023, as in effect on April 1, 2024) with 
respect to a basing action request submitted under sub-
section (a) until the Secretary of the Air Force— 
‘‘(A) has published a revision of such instruc-
tion that includes a definition of ‘programmatic bas-
ing decision’; and 
‘‘(B) provides to the congressional defense com-
mittees a briefing on such revision that includes a
1302 
description of the process for making a pro-
grammatic basing decision (as revised under sub-
paragraph (A)) and the criteria evaluated under 
such process. 
‘‘(2) With respect to a basing action request sub-
mitted under subsection (a) for which the Assistant Sec-
retary determines a programmatic basing decision (as de-
fined under the revision required by paragraph (1)) may 
be made, the Assistant Secretary— 
‘‘(A) shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees an explanation justifying why such re-
quest was not determined to be a strategic basing 
action; 
‘‘(B) shall provide to the congressional defense 
committees a briefing on the implementation of the 
programmatic basing decision; and 
‘‘(C) may not implement the programmatic bas-
ing decision until 30 days after the later of the date 
on which the submission described in subparagraph 
(A) or the briefing described in subparagraph (B) is 
made. 
‘‘(3) Upon implementation of the programmatic bas-
ing decision (as defined under the revision required by 
paragraph (1)) for a basing action request submitted 
under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may
1303 
not implement such request pursuant to the processes es-
tablished for a strategic basing decision. 
‘‘(i) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘action proponent’ has the mean-
ing given in the Department of the Air Force In-
struction 10–503 issued June 12, 2023, as in effect 
on April 1, 2024. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘Assistant Secretary’ means the 
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, In-
stallations, and Environment. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘basing action’ means an action 
by the Secretary of the Air Force to determine the 
location or relocation of a unit, an establishment, a 
mission, manpower, or a major weapon system (as 
defined in section 483 of title 10, United States 
Code) of the Air Force or Space Force for a period 
of one year or longer. 
‘‘(4) The term ‘military installation’ has the 
meaning given in section 2801 of title 10, United 
States Code. 
‘‘(5) The term ‘strategic basing action’ means 
a basing action that involves one or more of the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(A) Location or relocation of aircraft and 
non-aircraft weapon systems.
1304 
‘‘(B) An increase or decrease of 35 or 
more personnel assigned to a military installa-
tion, including members of the Department of 
the Air Force, civilian employees of the Depart-
ment of the Air Force, and contractors. 
‘‘(C) A request to move a non-Air Force 
entity onto a military installation or other real 
property of the Air Force. 
‘‘(D) A continuous rotational presence of a 
Department of the Air Force or non-Air Force 
entity on a military installation or other real 
property of the Air Force that would require— 
‘‘(i) a new military construction 
project; or 
‘‘(ii) presence for more than 300 days 
during a consecutive 18-month period with 
a increase of 35 or more personnel. 
‘‘(E) Any special interest action, regardless 
of scope or size, as determined by the Secretary 
of the Air Force or Secretary of Defense. 
‘‘(6) The term ‘Strategic Basing Group’ means 
a forum of officers in a grade of O–7 or O–8 and 
the civilian equivalents of such officers convened by 
the Assistant Secretary to evaluate strategic basing 
actions and providing alternatives to such strategic
1305 
basing actions that are consistent with the oper-
ations, basing objectives, policies, and programming 
requirements of the Department of the Air Force. 
‘‘(7) The term ‘Strategic Basing Lead’ means a 
commander of a major command, field command, or 
national guard base, and may be the action pro-
ponent that submitted a request under subsection 
(a). 
‘‘(8) The term ‘Strategic Basing Panel’ means 
a forum of officers in a grade of O–6 and the civil-
ian equivalents of such officers convened by the As-
sistant Secretary to support the Strategic Basing 
Group by providing an initial comprehensive review 
and assessment of a request for a strategic basing 
action.’’. 
SEC. 2832. INCLUSION OF TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS IN INTER-
GOVERNMENTAL 
SUPPORT 
AGREEMENTS 
FOR INSTALLATION-SUPPORT SERVICES. 
Section 2679 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘State or local government’’ each 
place it appears and inserting ‘‘State, local, or tribal’’.
1306 
SEC. 2833. IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO ACCESS TO MILI-
TARY INSTALLATIONS IN UNITED STATES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES FOR EXPEDITED AC-
CESS.—Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2698. Access to military installations: standards for 
entry to military installations in United 
States 
‘‘(a) ACCESS
TO
MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS
IN 
UNITED STATES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall de-
velop and maintain access standards applicable to all mili-
tary installations in the United States. Such access stand-
ards shall require screening standards appropriate to the 
type of installation involved, the security level of the in-
stallation, the category of individuals authorized to visit 
the installation, and the level of access to be granted, in-
cluding— 
‘‘(A) protocols and criteria to determine the fit-
ness of the individual to enter a military installation; 
‘‘(B) standards and methods for verifying the 
identity of the individual; and 
‘‘(C) other factors the Secretary determines ap-
propriate. 
‘‘(2) In developing the access standards under para-
graph (1), the Secretary shall—