517 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
eling and simulation requirements and that outlines a plan 
that details the Department’s modeling and simulation co-
ordination efforts. Such a plan shall— 
(1) identify the unique modeling and simulation 
capabilities of the components of the Department 
and the Combatant Commands; 
(2) identify incentives to reduce duplicative 
modeling and simulation capabilities of the compo-
nents of the Department and the Combatant Com-
mands and recommend capabilities to be divested 
where such duplication is not necessary; 
(3) recommend capabilities to be leveraged from 
within other Federal agencies, national laboratories, 
State and local governments, academia, private in-
dustry, and United States and international stand-
ards organizations; and 
(4) be capable of supporting joint training, ex-
perimentation, systems acquisition, test and evalua-
tion, assessment, and planning. 
(b) SUBMISSION OF REPORT.—Not later than nine 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit the report under subsection (a). 
(c) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report under 
subsection (a) shall include the following:
518 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
(1) An identification and description of the 
types of joint training, experimentation, systems ac-
quisition, test and evaluation, assessment, and plan-
ning that would be conducted using such a joint ca-
pability, together with a description of how such a 
joint capability would enhance accomplishment of 
the four priorities as focus of the 2006 Quadrennial 
Defense Review (QDR) Report of the Secretary of 
Defense issued on February 6, 2006. 
(2) A discussion of how establishment of such 
a joint capability would promote modeling and sim-
ulation innovation and transformation throughout 
the Department of Defense to improve operational 
capabilities and enhance national security. 
(3) A methodology, framework, and options 
that include consideration of leveraging existing ca-
pabilities that would accommodate requirements 
among all the Armed Forces, including common in-
frastructure and data. 
(4) A management plan for coordinating be-
tween functional and organizational stakeholders, as 
well as a plan to continuously introduce new mod-
eling and simulation technologies and divest out-
dated capabilities.
519 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
(5) Options to allow non-defense users to access 
such a modeling and simulation capability, as appro-
priate, for homeland security and consequence man-
agement for Federal, State, and local requirements. 
(6) Cost estimates and resource requirements to 
establish and maintain such a strategy, including es-
timates of costs and resource requirements for the 
use of government civilian and military, and contract 
personnel for the performance of management, oper-
ational, and logistics activities for such a capability. 
(7) An explanation of the relationship between 
and among such a capability and the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the military 
departments, commanders of combatant commands, 
Federal agencies, national laboratories, State and 
local governments, academia, private industry, 
United States and international standards organiza-
tions, and international partners with responsibility 
to use modeling and simulation to meet their mis-
sion. 
(8) A timeline for the establishment of such a 
capability and for such a capability to achieve— 
(A) initial operational capability; and 
(B) full operational capability.
520 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
(9) At least two alternative modeling and sim-
ulation coordination plans, including a Joint Mod-
eling and Simulation Development Strategy, pro-
vided that such plans include the required matters 
in subsection (a) and subsection (c), excluding sub-
section (c)(8), and provided that such reports were 
submitted to the Secretary by a commander of a 
Unified Combatant Command or Service Chief. 
SEC. 1034. REPORT ON IMPACT ON FAMILIES OF MILITARY 
PERSONNEL SERVING MULTIPLE OVERSEAS 
DEPLOYMENTS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report 
to Congress regarding the impact, including the financial 
and emotional effects, of multiple overseas deployments on 
the families of members of the Armed Forces serving those 
multiple deployments as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom 
and Operation Enduring Freedom. 
SEC. 1035. COMMERCIAL AVIATION TECHNOLOGIES. 
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
a study to examine the methods by which United States 
air carriers and aviation technology companies research, 
develop, and deploy commercial aviation technologies, in-
cluding processes and products, and to determine the ap-
plicability of the technologies to military use.
521 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
(b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study, the Sec-
retary shall determine whether technologies developed for 
commercial air carriers in any of the following areas are 
well-suited for technology transition programs: 
(1) Flight planning. 
(2) Flight operations and tracking. 
(3) Aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul. 
(4) Increasing fuel efficiency. 
(5) Optimizing labor productivity. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on 
Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of 
the House of Representatives a report on the results of 
the study, together with recommendations on whether the 
Department of Defense would benefit from commercial 
aviation technology solutions and, if so, which types of so-
lutions would best support the mission of the Department. 
SEC. 1036. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROCE-
DURES TO CLASSIFY EXCESS DEFENSE ARTI-
CLES AND DEFENSE SERVICES WITH MILI-
TARY TECHNOLOGY COMPONENTS. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, 
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall con-
522 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
duct a thorough review of the procedures by which the 
Department of Defense classifies defense articles and de-
fense services with military technology components as ex-
cess to the needs of the Department to identify the extent 
to which, and the manner in which, existing classification 
procedures have failed to prevent the transfer of defense 
articles and defense services with military technology com-
ponents to terrorists, state sponsors of terrorism, and 
other unfriendly countries or groups. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall sub-
mit to Congress a report that contains— 
(1) the results of the review of the existing clas-
sification procedures conducted under subsection (a); 
and 
(2) the measures to be implemented by the De-
partment of Defense to rectify the deficiencies of the 
existing classification procedures, including rec-
ommendations for any legislative changes that may 
be necessary to implement the measures. 
(c) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 
‘‘defense articles and defense services with military tech-
nology components’’ means those defense articles and de-
fense services designated by the President pursuant to sec-
523 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
tion 38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2778(a)(1)), commonly known as the United States Muni-
tions List. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 1041. ENHANCEMENT OF CORROSION CONTROL AND 
PREVENTION FUNCTIONS WITHIN DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) OFFICE
OF CORROSION POLICY
AND OVER-
SIGHT.—(1) Section 2228 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by striking the section heading and subsection 
(a) and inserting the following: 
‘‘§ 2228. Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight 
‘‘(a) OFFICE AND DIRECTOR.—(1) There is an Office 
of Corrosion Policy and Oversight within the Office of the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics. 
‘‘(2) The Office shall be headed by a Director of Cor-
rosion Policy and Oversight, who shall be assigned to such 
position by the Under Secretary from among civilian em-
ployees of the Department of Defense with the qualifica-
tions described in paragraph (3). The Director is respon-
sible in the Department of Defense to the Secretary of 
Defense (after the Under Secretary of Defense for Acqui-
sition, Technology, and Logistics) for the prevention and 
mitigation of corrosion of the military equipment and in-
524 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
frastructure of the Department of Defense. The Director 
shall report directly to the Under Secretary. 
‘‘(3) In order to qualify to be assigned to the position 
of Director, an individual shall— 
‘‘(A) have management expertise in, and profes-
sional experience with, corrosion project and policy 
implementation, including an understanding of the 
effects of corrosion policies on infrastructure; re-
search, development, test, and evaluation; and main-
tenance; and 
‘‘(B) have an understanding of Department of 
Defense budget formulation and execution, policy 
formulation, and planning and program require-
ments. 
‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall designate the po-
sition of Director as a critical acquisition position under 
section 1733(b)(1)(C) of this title.’’. 
(2) Section 2228(b) of such title is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘official or or-
ganization designated under subsection (a)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight 
(in this section referred to as the ‘Director’)’’; and 
(B) in paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5), by 
striking ‘‘designated official or organization’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Director’’.
525 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
(b) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR DIRECTOR OF OF-
FICE.—Section 2228 of such title is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 
subsections (d) and (f), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol-
lowing new subsection: 
‘‘(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES FOR DIRECTOR.— 
The Director is authorized to— 
‘‘(1) develop, update, and coordinate corrosion 
training with the Defense Acquisition University; 
‘‘(2) participate in the process within the De-
partment of Defense for the development of relevant 
directives and instructions; and 
‘‘(3) interact directly with the corrosion preven-
tion industry, trade associations, and scientific orga-
nizations engaged in corrosion prevention, including 
the National Academy of Sciences.’’. 
(c) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Section 2228 of such 
title is further amended by inserting after subsection (d) 
(as redesignated by subsection (b)) the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(e) REPORT.—(1) For each budget for a fiscal year, 
beginning with the budget for fiscal year 2009, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit, with the defense budget 
materials, a report on the following:
526 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
‘‘(A) Funding requirements for the long-term 
strategy developed under subsection (d). 
‘‘(B) The return on investment that would be 
achieved by implementing the strategy. 
‘‘(C) The funds requested in the budget com-
pared to the funding requirements. 
‘‘(D) A justification if the funding requirements 
are not fully funded in the budget. 
‘‘(2) Within 60 days after submission of the budget 
for a fiscal year, the Comptroller General shall provide to 
the congressional defense committees— 
‘‘(A) an analysis of the budget submission for 
corrosion control and prevention by the Department 
of Defense; and 
‘‘(B) an analysis of the report required under 
paragraph (1).’’. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—Subsection (f) of section 2228 of 
such title, as redesignated by subsection (b), is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(4) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal 
year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is 
submitted to Congress by the President under sec-
tion 1105(a) of title 31. 
‘‘(5) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with 
respect to a fiscal year, means the materials sub-
527 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
mitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in 
support of the budget for that fiscal year.’’. 
SEC. 1042. SUPPORT BY NATIONAL GUARD FOR NATIONAL 
SPECIAL 
SECURITY 
EVENTS 
AND 
OTHER 
CRITICAL NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 32, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new section: 
‘‘§ 116. Defense support of civil authorities 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—At the request of a Federal de-
partment or agency head in accordance with this section, 
and when authorized by the Secretary of Defense, the Gov-
ernor of a State may employ under this title units or mem-
bers of the National Guard of that State to provide de-
fense support of civil authorities to the requesting Federal 
department or agency. 
‘‘(b) ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN DEFENSE SUPPORT 
OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES.—Defense support of civil au-
thorities activities authorized by subsection (a) include 
support provided for national special security events and 
other activities determined by the Secretary of Defense as 
being critical to national security, including— 
‘‘(1) ground reconnaissance activities; 
‘‘(2) airborne reconnaissance activities; 
‘‘(3) logistical support;
528 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
‘‘(4) emergency medical assistance and services; 
‘‘(5) communications services; 
‘‘(6) security assistance and services; and 
‘‘(7) air and ground transportation. 
‘‘(c) REIMBURSEMENT.—(1) Subject to the excep-
tions in paragraph (3), the costs incurred by the National 
Guard shall be reimbursed to the Department of Defense 
from the appropriations available to the Federal depart-
ment or agency to which the support is provided. The re-
imbursement shall include the costs of— 
‘‘(A) the pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, 
gratuities, travel, and related expenses of personnel 
of the National Guard of that State; 
‘‘(B) the operation and maintenance of the 
equipment and facilities of the National Guard of 
that State; and 
‘‘(C) the procurement of services and equip-
ment, and the leasing of equipment, for the National 
Guard of that State. 
‘‘(2) Any funds received by the Department of De-
fense as reimbursement for support provided by units or 
members of the National Guard under this section shall 
be credited, at the option of the Secretary of Defense, to— 
‘‘(A) the appropriation, fund, or account from 
which funds were expended for the support; or
529 
•HR 1585 EH1S 
‘‘(B) the appropriate appropriation, fund, or ac-
count currently available for such purpose. 
‘‘(3) A Federal department or agency to which sup-
port is provided under this section is not required to reim-
burse the Department of Defense for such support if the 
Secretary of Defense waives reimbursement. The Sec-
retary of Defense may waive the reimbursement require-
ment under this section if— 
‘‘(A) the support is provided in the normal 
course of military training or operations; or 
‘‘(B) the support provided results in a benefit 
to units or members of the National Guard pro-
viding the support that is substantially equivalent to 
that which would otherwise be obtained from mili-
tary operations or training. 
‘‘(d) REQUIREMENTS FOR REQUESTS.—Requests for 
assistance from Federal departments or agencies under 
this section shall be submitted to the Secretary of Defense. 
Any such request shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) The specific support capability requested. 
‘‘(2) The duration of the requested support ac-
tivities. 
‘‘(3) A certification that the requested support 
activities will be fully reimbursable.