821 
(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this 
section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions 
as transfers under section 1001. 
(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer author-
ity provided by this section is in addition to the transfer 
authority provided under section 1001. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other 
Matters 
SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND. 
(a) APPLICATION
OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS
ON 
AVAILABILITY OF FUND.—Funds made available to the 
Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security 
Forces Fund for fiscal year 2012 shall be subject to the 
conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of sec-
tion 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), 
as amended by section 1531 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 
(b) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED USE OF FUND.—In 
addition to the types of authorized assistance described 
in section 1513(b)(2) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 428), amounts in the Afghanistan Security Forces 
Fund may be used to construct and operate schools for
822 
the purpose of providing remedial literacy instruction to 
recruits for Afghanistan Security Forces and civilian em-
ployees of the Afghanistan Ministry of Defense. 
(c) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of this section, 25 percent of the funds made available 
to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Secu-
rity Forces Fund for fiscal year 2012 may not be used 
to carry out contracts unless the Secretary of Defense cer-
tifies to Congress that the Department of Defense has suf-
ficient management and oversight mechanisms on such 
contracts. 
SEC. 1532. CONTINUATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF 
UNITED STATES FUNDS FOR CERTAIN FACILI-
TIES PROJECTS IN IRAQ. 
Section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4651) shall apply to funds authorized 
to be appropriated by this title. 
SEC. 1533. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PROJECT AUTHORITY 
AND 
RELATED 
REQUIREMENTS 
OF 
TASK 
FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND STABILITY OPER-
ATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of 
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
823 
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426) 
is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (6)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘October 31, 2011,’’ and 
inserting ‘‘October 31, 2011, and October 31, 
2012’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and in-
serting ‘‘the preceding fiscal year’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘September 
30,2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 
(b) FUNDING LIMITATION.—Paragraph (4) of such 
subsection is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end of the second sentence the following: ‘‘for fiscal 
year 2011 and $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2012’’. 
(c) SCOPE OF PROJECTS.—Paragraph (3) of such 
subsection is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘To the maximum extent possible, the ac-
tivities of the Task Force for Business and Stability Oper-
ations in Afghanistan should focus on improving the com-
mercial viability of other reconstruction or development 
activities in Afghanistan conducted by the United 
States.’’.
824 
TITLE XVI—ADDITIONAL 
BUDGET ITEMS 
Subtitle A—Procurement 
SEC. 1601. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MODIFICATION OF 
TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $126,308,000 for modification of 
torpedoes and related equipment. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 101, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of the Navy shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for 
the same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
825 
SEC. 1602. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ANTI-SUBMARINE 
WARFARE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $125,652,000 for anti-submarine 
warfare electronic equipment. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 101, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $9,600,000 for anti- 
submarine warfare applications in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1603. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SHALLOW WATER 
MINE COUNTER MEASURES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
826 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $1,048,000 for shallow water 
mine counter measures. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 101, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $7,975,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1604. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO LHA–7 SHIP PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $2,018,691,000 for the LHA–7 
ship program. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
827 
priated by section 101, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall obligate an additional $150,000,000 for the same 
purpose in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1605. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MOBILITY AIR-
CRAFT SIMULATORS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $198,100,000 for mobility air-
craft simulators. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 101, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force 
shall obligate an additional $25,000,000 for the same pur-
828 
pose, including for simulator training facilities for air mo-
bility pilots, in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1606. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS TO 
AIRCRAFT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $80,745,000 for Modifications to 
Aircraft. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 101, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $10,000,000 for radio communication 
systems for National Guard helicopters in furtherance of 
national security objectives.
829 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1607. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SH–60 CREW AND 
PASSENGER SURVIVABILITY UPGRADES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $2,291,899,000 for aircraft modi-
fications. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 101, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obli-
gate an additional $4,500,000 for SH–60 crew and pas-
senger survivability upgrades in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
830 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1608. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MODIFICATION OF 
IN SERVICE A–10 AIRCRAFT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $153,128,000 for modification of 
in service aircraft, A–10. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 101, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Air Force shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for 
lightweight airborne recovery systems in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
831 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1609. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO RADAR SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $18,818,000 for Navy radar sup-
port. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 101, as specified in the corresponding funding table 
in division D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obligate an 
additional $5,000,000 for Aegis ship support for engineer-
ing change proposals associated with combat system radar 
upgrades in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
832 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1610. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ELECTRONIC 
EQUIPMENT- AUTOMATION. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $335,664,000 for electronic 
equipment- automation. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 101, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for sup-
port of the deployment and adoption of new information 
processing systems in furtherance of national security ob-
jectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
833 
SEC. 1611. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO BASE DEFENSE SYS-
TEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $41,204,000 for other procure-
ment, Army, for base defense systems. Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 101, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of the Army shall obligate an additional $6,000,000 
for base defense system equipment in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1612. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SNIPER RIFLE 
MODIFICATIONS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
834 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $1,994,000 for sniper rifle modi-
fications. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 101, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $2,506,000 for modifications of weap-
ons and other combat vehicles in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1613. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO GENERATORS AND 
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $31,897,000 for generators and 
associated equipment. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
835 
propriated by section 101, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $10,000,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1614. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NATIONAL GUARD 
AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $0 for National Guard and Re-
serve Equipment. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 101, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of Defense shall
836 
obligate an additional $100,000,000 for the same purpose 
in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
Subtitle B—Research, 
Development, Test, and Evaluation 
SEC. 1616. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NEW DESIGN SSN. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $97,235,000 for New Design 
SSN. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obli-
gate an additional $10,000,000 for continued design im-
provements for new SSNs in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives.
837 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1617. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ADVANCED SUB-
MARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $856,326,000 for advanced sub-
marine system development. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $9,000,000 for fu-
ture undersea capabilities in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
838 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1618. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SURFACE ANTI-SUB-
MARINE WARFARE. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $29,797,000 for surface anti-sub-
marine warfare. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall obligate an additional $3,500,000 for the same pur-
pose in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
839 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1619. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SHIP PRELIMINARY 
DESIGN AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $22,213,000 for ship preliminary 
design and feasibility studies. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $19,900,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
840 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1620. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL PRE-
PAREDNESS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $54,000,000 for research, devel-
opment, test, and evaluation, Navy, for industrial pre-
paredness. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obli-
gate an additional $5,000,000 for the same purpose in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
841 
SEC. 1621. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MIXED CONVEN-
TIONAL LOAD CAPABILITY FOR BOMBER AIR-
CRAFT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $19,900,000 for the Warfighter 
Rapid Acquisition Program. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Air Force shall obligate an additional $20,000,000 for 
the development of mixed conventional load capability for 
bomber aircraft to prosecute a broad range of pre-planned 
and rapidly emerging target sets in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
842 
SEC. 1622. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO TACAIR-LAUNCHED 
UAS CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $9,400,000 for tactical unmanned 
aerial vehicles. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall obligate an additional $10,000,000 for TACAIR- 
launched UAS capability development in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
843 
SEC. 
1623. 
BUDGET 
ITEM 
RELATING 
TO 
ELECTRO- 
PHOTONIC COMPONENT CAPABILITY DEVEL-
OPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $123,000,000 for aviation im-
provements. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obli-
gate an additional $10,000,000 for electro-photonic com-
ponent capability development in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
844 
SEC. 1624. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AIRBORNE RECON-
NAISSANCE SYSTEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $106,877,000 for airborne recon-
naissance systems. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $3,000,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1625. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SMALL BUSINESS 
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
845 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $0 for Small Business Innovative 
Research. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $5,000,000 to accelerate the use of 
technologies from the small business innovative research 
program into Army acquisition programs of record in fur-
therance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1626. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO DEFENSE RE-
SEARCH SCIENCES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $446,123,000 for defense re-
846 
search sciences. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall obligate an additional $2,500,000 to conduct re-
search into the magnetic and electric fields of the coastal 
ocean environment in furtherance of national security ob-
jectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1627. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO DEFENSE RE-
SEARCH SCIENCES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $213,942,000 for Defense Re-
search Sciences. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding
847 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Army 
shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 to support re-
search into innovative new techniques for combat wound 
repair in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1628. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMMUNICATIONS 
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $5,312,000 for research, develop-
ment, test and evaluation, Army, for communications ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $3,000,000 for the
848 
development of communications and information net-
working technologies to support Army requirements in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1629. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NIGHT VISION 
TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $39,813,000 for research, devel-
opment, test and evaluation, Army, for night vision tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $4,000,000 to develop radio frequency
849 
signals intelligence processing equipment and associated 
applications in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1630. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NIGHT VISION 
TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $57,203,000 for Night Vision 
Technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $8,000,000 for the development of en-
hanced low-light level visual sensors for persistent surveil-
lance and dismounted soldier applications in furtherance 
of national security objectives.
850 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1631. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NIGHT VISION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $42,414,000 for night vision ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for the 
development of deployable force protection sensors in fur-
therance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
851 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1632. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NIGHT VISION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $42,414,000 for night vision ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for the 
development and fielding of a solution for helicopter 
‘‘brownout’’ situational awareness in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
852 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1633. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NIGHT VISION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $42,414,000 for Night Vision Ad-
vanced Technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $4,800,000 for night 
vision advanced technology development in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
853 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1634. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ROTARY WING SUR-
FACES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $80,317,000 for Military Engi-
neering Technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $6,000,000 for the 
development of mission planning and support tools for ro-
tary wing surfaces in furtherance of national security ob-
jectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
854 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1635. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WEAPONS AND MU-
NITIONS TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $57,203,000 for weapons and mu-
nitions technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $30,000,000 for the 
development of weapons and munitions technologies by 
small and non-traditional defense businesses in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
855 
SEC. 1636. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WEAPONS AND MU-
NITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,077,000 for Weapons and 
Munitions Advanced Technology. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of the Army shall obligate an additional $2,500,000 for 
development of innovative manufacturing techniques and 
processes for munitions and weapons systems in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
856 
SEC. 1637. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WEAPONS AND MU-
NITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,077,000 for Weapons and 
Munitions Advanced Technology. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of the Army shall obligate an additional $2,500,000 for 
the development of innovative manufacturing techniques 
and processes for munitions and weapons systems in fur-
therance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
857 
SEC. 1638. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MATERIALS TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $30,258,000 for Materials Tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $4,000,000 to develop innovative nano-
materials and nanomanufacturing processes for warfighter 
systems in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1639. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MATERIALS TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
858 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $30,258,000 for Materials Tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $1,500,000 for the development and 
demonstration of novel lightweight composite packaging 
and structural materials in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1640. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MATERIALS TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $30,258,000 for materials tech-
859 
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $5,000,000 for advanced manufac-
turing, repair, and sustainment technologies for defense 
needs in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1641. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO LIGHTWEIGHT 
BODY ARMOR. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $64,057,000 for plasma treat-
ment of fiber for force protection. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary
860 
of the Navy shall obligate an additional $5,100,000 for 
the development of new lightweight body armor in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1642. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL PRE-
PAREDNESS MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $23,103,000 for industrial pre-
paredness manufacturing technology. Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 
for sustainment of the industrial base for body armor in 
furtherance of national security objectives.
861 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1643. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SECURE MICRO-
ELECTRONICS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $23,887,000 for Generic Logistics 
R&D Technology Demonstrations. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of Defense shall obligate an additional $15,000,000 to 
conduct research into the development, identification, and 
management of secure microelectronics in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
862 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1644. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY TACTICAL 
COMMAND AND CONTROL HARDWARE AND 
SOFTWARE. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $123,935,000 for Army tactical 
command and control hardware and software. Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as 
specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, 
the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an additional 
$2,000,000 for the development of interoperable national 
security information sharing systems in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
863 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1645. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO BATTLESPACE 
KNOWLEDGE 
DEVELOPMENT 
AND 
DEM-
ONSTRATION. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $38,656,000 for battlespace 
knowledge development and demonstration. Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as 
specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, 
the Secretary of the Air Force shall obligate an additional 
$4,000,000 to conduct research and educational programs 
that support cyber workforce development in furtherance 
of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
864 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1646. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO TECHNOLOGY 
TRANSFER. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $2,553,000 for technology trans-
fer. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 201, as specified in the corresponding funding table 
in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force shall obligate 
an additional $9,000,000 for small business technology 
transfer efforts into major Department of Defense acquisi-
tion programs of record in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
865 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1647. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO UNIVERSITY RE-
SEARCH INITIATIVES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $80,977,000 for research, devel-
opment, test, and evaluation, Army, for university re-
search initiatives. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of Defense shall 
obligate an additional $7,000,000 for multidisciplinary re-
search into nanotechnology science in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
866 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1648. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO UNIVERSITY RE-
SEARCH INITIATIVES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $140,273,000 for university re-
search initiatives. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force 
shall obligate an additional $7,000,000 for the develop-
ment of hypersonic testing facilities for defense applica-
tions in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
867 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1649. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO CLINICAL CARE 
AND RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $80,977,000 for university re-
search initiatives. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Army 
shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 for the develop-
ment of informatics tools to support clinical care and re-
search in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
868 
SEC. 1650. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $105,929,000 for medical tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $3,000,000 for the same purpose, in-
cluding the development of biomaterials for wound preven-
tion and healing, in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
869 
SEC. 1651. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $105,929,000 for research, devel-
opment, test, and evaluation, Army, for medical tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $5,000,000 for the same purpose in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1652. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
870 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $105,929,000 for medical tech-
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $3,500,000 for the same purpose, in-
cluding for the continued development of high-throughput, 
microarray diagnostic systems, in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1653. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $105,929,000 for medical tech-
871 
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $1,468,000 to support research into in-
novative new techniques to develop vaccines of interest to 
the military in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1654. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $68,171,000 for medical advanced 
technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
872 
gate an additional $10,000,000 for the same purpose, in-
cluding for functional genomics research to further de-
velop cancer treatment and detection methods, in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1655. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $68,171,000 for medical advanced 
technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of Defense shall obligate 
an additional $5,000,000 for the same purpose (including
873 
for the continued development of telemedicine tech-
nologies) in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1656. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $68,171,000 for medical advanced 
technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $3,000,000 for the same purpose, in-
cluding for the study of health effects from manganese 
and other potential toxins, in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives.
874 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1657. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MEDICAL AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $68,171,000 for medical advanced 
technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $5,000,000 for the development of in-
novative medical training technologies in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
875 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1658. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO CHEMICAL AND BI-
OLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $219,873,000 for chemical and 
biological program defense program applied research. Of 
the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 201, 
as specified in the corresponding funding table in division 
D, the Secretary of Defense shall obligate an additional 
$5,000,000 for the same purpose, including for university- 
led applied research, in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
876 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1659. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SPECIAL OPER-
ATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOP-
MENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $35,242,000 for special oper-
ations advanced technology development. Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 
for the same purpose in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
877 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1660. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for combating ter-
rorism technology support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $3,500,000 for the 
same purpose (including for risk assessment and resource 
allocation) in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
878 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1661. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for combating ter-
rorism technology support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $1,200,000 for the 
same purpose (including for the development of mobile 
training content and distance learning capabilities) in fur-
therance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
879 
SEC. 1662. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for combating ter-
rorism technology support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $6,500,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1663. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
880 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for Combating Ter-
rorism Technology Support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $3,000,000 for the 
development of modeling and simulation technologies for 
testing of blast structures in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1664. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for combating ter-
881 
rorism technology support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1665. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBATING TER-
RORISM TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $77,019,000 for combating ter-
rorism technology support. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of
882 
Defense shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for com-
bating terrorism technology support to improve the col-
laborative experimentation model in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1666. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WEAPONS OF MASS 
DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $196,954,000 for weapons of 
mass destruction defeat technologies. Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 
for the same purpose, including weapons of mass destruc-
883 
tion-related strategic studies and university partnerships, 
in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1667. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COUNTERMINE SYS-
TEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $20,280,000 for countermine sys-
tems. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $4,500,000 for the same purpose in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
884 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1668. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MINE AND EXPEDI-
TIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $37,583,000 for Mine and Expe-
ditionary Warfare Applied Research. Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of the Navy shall obligate an additional $8,000,000 
for the development of remote- robotic naval mine counter-
measure research and development capability in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
885 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1669. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SPECIAL APPLICA-
TIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $5,045,000 for special operations 
advanced technology development. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of Defense shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for the 
same purpose, including for special applications for contin-
gencies such as for the development and demonstration 
of tactical unmanned aerial vehicles, in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
886 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1670. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MICROELEC-
TRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND 
SUPPORT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $91,132,000 for Microelectronics 
Technology Development and Support. Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $3,000,000 
for the development of innovative semiconductor design 
and fabrication tools in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
887 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1671. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WARFIGHTER 
SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $101,205,000 for Warfighter 
Sustainment Applied Research. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of the Navy shall obligate an additional $2,500,000 to 
support research into corrosion control and anti-biofouling 
coatings in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
888 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1672. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MARINE CORPS 
LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $44,845,000 for Marine Corps 
Landing Force Technology. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $3,000,000 for the 
development of situational awareness and communications 
networking tools for tactical units in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
889 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1673. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ADVANCED CON-
CEPTS AND SIMULATION. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $20,933,000 for Advanced Con-
cepts and Simulation. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $10,000,000 to de-
velop realistic human representations of software agents 
for simulation systems in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
890 
SEC. 1674. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO HUMAN EFFECTIVE-
NESS APPLIED RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $86,663,000 for Human Effec-
tiveness Applied Research. Of the amounts authorized to 
be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Air Force shall obligate an additional $2,200,000 to 
develop training and simulation capabilities for the Air 
Force in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1675. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AEROSPACE PRO-
PULSION. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
891 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $207,508,000 for aerospace pro-
pulsion. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force shall 
obligate an additional $2,000,000 for the development of 
innovative aircraft deoxygeneration systems in furtherance 
of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1676. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO END ITEM INDUS-
TRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $59,297,000 for end item indus-
trial preparedness activities. Of the amounts authorized
892 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $7,000,000 to de-
velop a 3–D model-based design and manufacturing capa-
bility in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1677. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SENSORS AND 
ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $43,521,000 for Sensors and 
Electronic Survivability. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $10,000,000 for the
893 
development of command, control, and navigation capabili-
ties for manned and unmanned aircraft in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1678. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MILITARY ENGI-
NEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $36,516,000 for Military Engi-
neering Advanced Technology. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for the 
development of innovative capabilities that support core
894 
missions of the Army Corps of Engineers in furtherance 
of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1679. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AVIATION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $62,193,000 for aviation ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $8,000,000 for the 
same purpose, including for the development and dem-
onstration of a high-efficiency air-breathing turbine pro-
895 
pulsion system for unmanned aircraft systems, in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1680. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ESTABLISHMENT 
OF PROTOCOLS FOR JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 
LEAD-FREE ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $1,387,926,000 for joint strike 
fighter development. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Air Force shall obligate an additional $1,000,000 for 
the development of protocols for the use of lead-free solder
896 
products and finishes in the joint strike fighter in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1681. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO PORTABLE HELI-
COPTER OXYGEN DELIVERY SYSTEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $73,728,000 for infantry support 
weapons. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $3,000,000 for improvements to port-
able helicopter oxygen delivery systems in furtherance of 
national security objectives.
897 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1682. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ADVANCED ROTOR-
CRAFT FLIGHT RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $62,193,000 for aviation ad-
vanced technology . Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $8,000,000 for ad-
vanced rotorcraft flight research in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
898 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1683. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MISSILE AND ROCK-
ET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $90,602,000 for missile and rock-
et advanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $6,250,000 for the 
development of missile simulation technology in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
899 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1684. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MISSILE AND ROCK-
ET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $90,602,000 for missile and rock-
et advanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $4,300,000 for base 
defense counter fire intercept systems in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
900 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1685. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COMBAT VEHICLE 
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $53,700,000 for combat vehicle 
improvement programs. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $25,000,000 for the 
same purpose, including for the M1A1 Abrams tank en-
gine technology insertion demonstration program, in fur-
therance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
901 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1686. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO WARFIGHTER AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $52,979,000 for Warfighter Ad-
vanced Technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
902 
SEC. 1687. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AVIATION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $62,193,000 for aviation ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $2,500,000 for the 
same purpose, including for the development and dem-
onstration of autonomous cargo for rotorcraft unmanned 
aerial vehicles, in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
903 
SEC. 1688. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AVIATION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $62,193,000 for research, devel-
opment, test and evaluation, Army, for aviation advanced 
technology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obli-
gate an additional $7,000,000 for the same purpose (in-
cluding for common data link waveform improvements) in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
904 
SEC. 1689. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AVIATION AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $62,193,000 for aviation ad-
vanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $2,300,000 to con-
duct research on corrosion reduction for rotor craft avia-
tion platforms in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
905 
SEC. 1690. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MUNITIONS STAND-
ARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS, AND SAFETY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $57,142,000 for munitions stand-
ardization, effectiveness, and safety. Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of the Army shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 
for enhanced survivability and lethality system develop-
ment in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1691. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO AEGIS BALLISTIC 
MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section
906 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $960,267,000 for Aegis ballistic 
missile defense. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency shall obligate an additional $5,000,000 
for expanding the engagement capability of the Aegis bal-
listic missile defense in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1692. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO OPERATIONALLY 
RESPONSIVE SPACE. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $86,500,000 for operationally re-
907 
sponsive space. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force 
shall obligate an additional $20,000,000 for the acquisi-
tion of additional operationally responsive space capabili-
ties to meet the urgent needs of commanders, further de-
velop and demonstrate a modular architecture, and sup-
port enabling technologies and infrastructure in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1693. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO SPACE TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $115,300,000 for space tech-
908 
nology. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 201, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of the Air Force shall 
obligate an additional $3,000,000 for expanding research 
for space technology in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1694. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY NET ZERO 
PROGRAMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $4,946,000 for Environmental 
Quality Technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of
909 
the Army shall obligate an additional $8,000,000 for 
Army net zero programs in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1695. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO OFFSHORE RANGE 
ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ASSESSMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $66,409,000 for the Strategic En-
vironmental Research Program. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of Defense shall obligate an additional $1,750,000 for off-
shore range environmental baseline assessment in further-
ance of national security objectives.
910 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1696. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE 
CORROSION 
PROTECTION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $3,221,000 for the Department 
of Defense Corrosion Protection Projects. Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $10,300,000 
for the same purpose in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
911 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1697. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO STUDY OF RENEW-
ABLE AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY APPLICA-
TIONS IN THE PACIFIC REGION. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $446,123,000 for defense re-
search sciences. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 for the study of 
renewable and alternative energy applications in the Pa-
cific Region in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
912 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1698. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ALTERNATIVE EN-
ERGY FOR MOBILE POWER APPLICATIONS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $156,901,000 for Force Protec-
tion Applied research. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 for alter-
native energy for mobile power applications in furtherance 
of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
913 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ADVANCED BAT-
TERY TECHNOLOGIES. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $64,057,000 for force protection 
advanced technology. Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 for ad-
vanced battery technologies in furtherance of national se-
curity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
914 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699A. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO OPERATIONAL EN-
ERGY IMPROVEMENT PILOT PROJECT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $20,444,000 for Operational En-
ergy Capability Improvement. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
Defense shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for an 
operational energy pilot project in furtherance of national 
security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
915 
SEC. 1699B. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO MICROGRID PILOT 
PROGRAM. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $30,000,000 for the installation 
energy test bed. Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated by section 201, as specified in the corresponding 
funding table in division D, the Secretary of Defense shall 
obligate an additional $2,000,000 for the microgrid pilot 
program in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699C. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ADVANCED SUR-
FACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012,
916 
the President requested $18,249,000 for Advanced Sur-
face Machinery Systems. Of the amounts authorized to be 
appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Navy shall obligate an additional $10,000,000 for the 
same purpose in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699D. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO BASE CAMP FUEL 
CELLS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $36,516,000 for Military Engi-
neering Advanced Technology. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the cor-
917 
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $2,000,000 for base 
camp fuel cells in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699E. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO DEFENSE ALTER-
NATIVE ENERGY. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $17,888,000 for the Defense-wide 
Manufacturing Science and Technology Program. Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 201, as 
specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, 
the Secretary of Defense shall obligate an additional
918 
$2,000,000 for defense alternative energy in furtherance 
of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699F. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO RADIOLOGICAL 
CONTAMINATION RESEARCH. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $66,409,000 for the Strategic En-
vironmental Research Program. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 201, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of Defense shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for ra-
diological contamination research in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives.
919 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699F–1. REPORTS ON INCREASED BUDGET ITEMS. 
(a) REPORTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—For each program described 
in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees a report 
containing— 
(A) a justification of the use of the total 
amount appropriated for the program for fiscal 
year 2012; and 
(B) the process by which such amounts 
were awarded. 
(2) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit 
each report under paragraph (1) by not later than 
the date that is 180 days after the date on which
920 
the funds for the program for fiscal year 2012 have 
been allocated. 
(b) PROGRAM DESCRIBED.—A program described in 
this subsection is a program element funded— 
(1) with amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by section 201; and 
(2) in an amount that is more than the amount 
requested by the President in the budget submitted 
to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United 
States Code, for fiscal year 2012. 
Subtitle C—Operation and 
Maintenance 
SEC. 1699G. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE 
CORROSION 
PREVENTION 
PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $7,324,000 for the Department 
of Defense Corrosion Prevention Program. Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301, as 
specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, 
the Secretary of Defense shall obligate an additional 
$22,700,000 for the same purpose in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives.
921 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699H. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO NAVY EMER-
GENCY MANAGEMENT AND PREPAREDNESS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $38,425,841,000 for Operation & 
Maintenance, Navy Budget Activity 01, Operating Forces. 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
301, as specified in the corresponding funding table in di-
vision D, the Secretary of the Navy shall obligate an addi-
tional $2,000,000 for emergency management and pre-
paredness of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to
922 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699I. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY SIMULATION 
TRAINING SYSTEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $2,939,455,000 for Operation & 
Maintenance, Army Budget Activity 01, Force Readiness 
Operations Support, Line 070. Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 301, as specified in the cor-
responding funding table in division D, the Secretary of 
the Army shall obligate an additional $4,000,000 for sim-
ulation training systems in furtherance of national secu-
rity objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall—
923 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699J. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY INDUSTRIAL 
FACILITY ENERGY MONITORING. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $2,745,667,000 for Operation 
and Maintenance Army, Line 110, Facilities Sustainment, 
Restoration, and Modernization. Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 301, as specified in the 
corresponding funding table in division D, the Secretary 
of the Army shall obligate an additional $2,380,000 for 
Army Industrial Facility Energy Monitoring in further-
ance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
924 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699K. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY NATIONAL 
GUARD CIVIL SUPPORT TEAM INFORMATION 
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $706,299,000 for Operation & 
Maintenance, Army National Guard Budget Activity 12, 
Line 070, Force Readiness Operations Support. Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301, as 
specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, 
the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an additional 
$2,000,000 for Civil Support Team Information Manage-
ment Systems in furtherance of national security objec-
tives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
925 
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699L. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO ARMY ARSENALS. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $7,973,300 for Operation & Main-
tenance, Army Budget Activity 04, Administration and 
Service-wide Activities, line 423, Logistic Support Activi-
ties. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 301, as specified in the corresponding funding table 
in division D, the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an 
additional $6,000,000 for capital improvements at United 
States Army arsenals in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
926 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
SEC. 1699M. BUDGET ITEM RELATING TO COLD WEATHER 
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT. 
(a) ADDITIONAL, DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHOR-
ITY.—In the budget submitted to Congress under section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, 
the President requested $3,986,766,000 for Operation & 
Maintenance, Defense-wide, Special Operations Com-
mand. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 301, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in division D, the Secretary of Defense shall obligate 
an additional $3,000,000 for cold weather protective 
equipment in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in the second sentence of subsection (a) with or to a spe-
cific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
927 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for mili-
tary construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall ex-
pire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2015. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
authorizations for military construction projects, land ac-
quisition, family housing projects and facilities, and con-
tributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Se-
928 
curity Investment Program (and authorizations of appro-
priations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2015 for military con-
struction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program. 
SEC. 
2003. 
LIMITATION 
ON 
IMPLEMENTATION 
OF 
PROJECTS DESIGNATED AS VARIOUS LOCA-
TIONS. 
The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a mili-
tary department may not enter into an award of a project 
authorized for various locations in titles XXI through 
XXVII, as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
until the Secretary concerned submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report that includes the following: 
(1) Within the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated in titles XXI through XXVII, a list of the 
proposed projects. 
(2) A Military Construction Data Sheet for 
each project.
929 
(3) A certification that the projects can be 
awarded in the year for which the appropriation of 
funds is made. 
(4) A certification that the projects are listed in 
the current Future Years Defense Program. 
SEC. 2004. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI, and 
XXVII shall take effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2011; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104 and available for military construc-
tion projects inside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ......................
Fort Wainwright ..........................................
$114,000,000 
JB Elmendorf-Richardson ...........................
$103,600,000
930 
Army: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ...................
Fort Rucker .................................................
$11,600,000 
California .................
Fort Irwin ....................................................
$23,000,000 
Presidio Monterey ........................................
$3,000,000 
Colorado ...................
Fort Carson, Colorado .................................
$238,600,000 
Georgia ....................
Fort Benning ...............................................
$66,700,000 
Fort Gordon .................................................
$1,450,000 
Fort Stewart, Georgia ..................................
$2,600,000 
Hawaii .....................
Fort Shafter .................................................
$17,500,000 
Schofield Barracks .......................................
$105,000,000 
Kansas .....................
Forbes Air Field ..........................................
$5,300,000 
Fort Riley, Kansas .......................................
$83,400,000 
Kentucky ..................
Fort Campbell, Kentucky .............................
$247,500,000 
Fort Knox ....................................................
$55,000,000 
Louisiana .................
Fort Polk, Louisiana ....................................
$70,100,000 
Maryland ..................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ............................
$78,500,000 
Fort Meade ..................................................
$79,000,000 
Missouri ...................
Fort Leonard Wood .....................................
$49,000,000 
North Carolina ........
Fort Bragg ...................................................
$186,000,000 
New York .................
Fort Drum, New York .................................
$13,300,000 
Oklahoma .................
Fort Sill .......................................................
$184,600,000 
Mcalester ......................................................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina .........
Fort Jackson ................................................
$63,900,000 
Texas .......................
Fort Bliss .....................................................
$149,500,000 
Fort Hood, Texas .........................................
$132,000,000 
JB San Antonio ...........................................
$10,400,000 
Red River Army Depot ................................
$44,000,000 
Utah .........................
Dugway Proving Ground .............................
$32,000,000 
Virginia ....................
Fort Belvoir .................................................
$83,000,000 
JB Langley Eustis .......................................
$26,000,000 
Washington ..............
JB Lewis McChord ......................................
$296,300,000 
Various Locations ....
Unspecified ...................................................
$70,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104 and available for military construc-
tion projects outside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan ................
Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan .................
$80,000,000 
Germany .....................
Germersheim ..............................................
$37,500,000
931 
Army: Outside the United States—Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Grafenwoehr ..............................................
$38,000,000 
Landstuhl ..................................................
$63,000,000 
Oberdachstetten .........................................
$12,200,000 
Stuttgart ....................................................
$12,200,000 
Vilseck .......................................................
$20,000,000 
Honduras Various ......
Honduras various ......................................
$25,000,000 
Korea, Republic of .....
Camp Carroll .............................................
$41,000,000 
Camp Henry ..............................................
$48,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104 and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Units 
Amount 
Belgium ........................
Brussels ........................
Land Purchase 
for GFOQ 
(10 units) ...
$10,000,000 
Germany .......................
Grafenwoehr .................
Family Hous-
ing New 
Construction 
(26 units) ...
$13,000,000 
Illesheim .......................
Family Hous-
ing Replace-
ment Con-
struction (80 
units) ..........
$41,000,000 
Vilseck ..........................
Family Hous-
ing New 
Construction 
(22 units) ...
$12,000,000
932 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2104 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,897,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2104 and avail-
able for military family housing functions as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Army may improve existing military family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for mili-
tary construction, land acquisition, and military family 
housing functions of the Department of the Army, as spec-
ified in the funding table in section 4601.
933 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for 
construction of a Multipurpose Training Range at the in-
stallation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up 
to 1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the 
Army’s construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training 
Ranges. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Schofield 
Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 
452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 451 
in lieu of building 452. 
(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (di-
vision B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort 
Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Mainte-
nance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the
934 
Army may construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking 
apron consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines 
for Aircraft Maintenance Hangars and associated parking 
aprons. 
(c) GERMANY.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden, 
Germany, for construction of an Information Processing 
Center at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 
construct up to 9,400 square yards of vehicle parking ga-
rage consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines 
for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 square 
yards of parking area. 
SEC. 2107. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT USING 
PRIOR-YEAR UNOBLIGATED ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION FUNDS. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of 
the Army may carry out a military construction project 
to construct a water treatment facility for Fort Irwin, 
California, in the amount of $115,000,000. 
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR ARMY MILI-
TARY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.—To carry out the project 
described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army may
935 
use available, unobligated Army military construction 
funds appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 
2012. 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary 
of the Army shall provide information in accordance with 
section 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding 
the project described in subsection (a). If it becomes nec-
essary to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary 
shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such 
title regarding authorized cost and scope of work vari-
ations. 
SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 
503), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection 
(b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 
504) and extended by section 2108 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4440), shall remain 
in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enact-
ment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
936 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Louisiana .........
Fort Polk ...............
Child Care Facility ...........
$6,100,000 
Missouri ...........
Fort Leonard Wood 
Multipurpose Machine 
Gun Range ....................
$4,150,000 
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 
4658), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection 
(b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 
4658), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the 
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for mili-
tary construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Alabama ..........
Anniston Army 
Depot .................
Lake Yard Interchange ....
$1,400,000 
Hawaii .............
Schofield Barracks 
Brigade Complex ..............
$65,000,000 
Battalion Complex ............
$69,000,000 
Battalion Complex ............
$27,000,000 
Infrastructure Expansion
$76,000,000 
New Jersey ......
Picatinny Arsenal ..
Ballistic Evaluation Facil-
ity Phase I ....................
$9,900,000 
Virginia ...........
Fort Eustis ............
Vehicle Paint Facility .......
$3,900,000
937 
SEC. 2110. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT CER-
TAIN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 
The table in section 3002 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 
of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4503) is amended— 
(1) in the project specification for the Army for 
‘‘Entry Control Point and Access Roads’’ that ap-
pears immediately below the project specifications 
for Bagram Air Force Base, Afghanistan, by strik-
ing ‘‘Delaram Ii’’ and inserting ‘‘Delaram II’’; and 
(2) in the project specifications for the Army 
for the Shank installation, Afghanistan, by striking 
‘‘Expand Extended Cooperation Programme 1 and 
Extended Cooperation Programme 2’’ in the Project 
title column and inserting ‘‘Expand Entry Control 
Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2’’. 
SEC. 2111. ADDITIONAL BUDGET ITEMS RELATING TO ARMY 
CONSTRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) TRAINING FACILITIES.—Of the amounts author-
ized to be appropriated by section 2104, as specified in 
the corresponding funding table in section 4601, the Sec-
retary of the Army shall obligate an additional 
$20,000,000 for Army training facilities in furtherance of 
national security objectives.
938 
(b) COMMUNITY
HOUSING
FACILITIES.—Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 2104, 
as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an addi-
tional $10,000,000 for community housing facilities in 
furtherance of national security objectives. 
(c) TROOP HOUSING FACILITIES.—Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by section 2104, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Army shall obligate an additional 
$10,000,000 for Troop housing facilities in furtherance of 
national security objectives. 
(d) UTILITIES AND GROUND IMPROVEMENTS.—Of 
the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
2104, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an 
additional $10,000,000 for Army utilities and ground im-
provements in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(e) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES.—Of 
the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
2104, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army shall obligate an 
additional $20,000,000 for research and development fa-
cilities in furtherance of national security objectives.
939 
(f) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in this section with or to a specific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204 and available for military construc-
tion projects inside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ....................
Yuma ...........................................................
$162,785,000 
California .................
Barstow .......................................................
$8,590,000 
Bridgeport ...................................................
$19,238,000 
Camp Pendleton ..........................................
$335,080,000 
Coronado .....................................................
$108,435,000
940 
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Point Mugu .................................................
$15,377,000 
Twentynine Palms ......................................
$67,109,000 
Florida .....................
Jacksonville .................................................
$36,552,000 
Whiting Field ..............................................
$20,620,000 
Georgia ....................
Kings Bay ...................................................
$86,063,000 
Hawaii .....................
Barking Sands ............................................
$9,679,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ..............
$7,492,000 
Kaneohe Bay ...............................................
$57,704,000 
Illinois ......................
Great Lakes ................................................
$91,042,000 
Maryland ..................
Indian Head ................................................
$67,779,000 
Patuxent River ............................................
$45,844,000 
North Carolina ........
Camp Lejeune .............................................
$200,482,000 
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station .....
$17,760,000 
New River ...................................................
$78,930,000 
South Carolina .........
Beaufort ......................................................
$21,096,000 
Virginia ....................
Norfolk ........................................................
$108,228,000 
Portsmouth .................................................
$74,864,000 
Quantico ......................................................
$183,690,000 
Washington ..............
Bremerton ...................................................
$13,341,000 
Kitsap .........................................................
$758,842,000 
Various Locations .....
Unspecified .................................................
$59,998,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204 and available for military construc-
tion projects outside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain ....................
SW Asia .......................................................
$100,204,000 
Diego Garcia ............
Diego Garcia ................................................
$35,444,000 
Djibouti ....................
Camp Lemonier ............................................
$89,499,000 
Guam ........................
Joint Region Marianas .................................
$77,267,000
941 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for 
military family housing functions as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may 
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction 
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and avail-
able for military family housing functions as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Navy may improve existing military family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2011, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601.
942 
(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in sub-
section (a) may be used for architectural and engineering 
services and construction design of any military construc-
tion project necessary to establish a homeport for a nu-
clear-powered aircraft carrier at Naval Station Mayport, 
Florida. 
SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 
503), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection 
(b), as provided in section 2201(c) of that Act (122 Stat. 
511) and extended by section 2206 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain 
in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act au-
thorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
Location 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide .......
Unspecified ............
Host Nation Infrastruc-
ture ...............................
$2,700,000
943 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT FOR CONSISTENCY IN 
PROJECT AUTHORIZATION DISPLAY.—The table in sec-
tion 2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 511) is amended by inserting at the end 
the following new row: 
‘‘Worldwide Unspecified ...........
Host Nation Infrastructure .....
$2,700,000’’. 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 
4658), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection 
(b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (122 Stat. 
4670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the 
date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
California ........
Marine Corps Base, 
Camp Pendleton 
Operations Assess Points, 
Red Beach ....................
$11,970,000 
Marine Corps Air 
Station, Miramar 
Emergency Response Sta-
tion ................................
$6,530,000 
District of Co-
lumbia ..........
Navy Yard .............
Child Development Center 
$9,340,000
944 
SEC. 2207. ADDITIONAL BUDGET ITEMS RELATING TO NAVY 
CONSTRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) MAINTENANCE AND PRODUCTION FACILITIES.— 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
2204, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy shall obligate an 
additional $10,000,000 for maintenance and production 
facilities in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(b) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES.—Of 
the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
2204, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy shall obligate an 
additional $20,000,000 for research and development fa-
cilities in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(c) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in this section with or to a specific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law.
945 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304 and available for military construc-
tion projects inside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations in-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ................................
Eielson AFB .................................
$45,000,000 
JB Elmendorf-Richardson ............
$97,000,000 
Arizona ..............................
Davis-Monthan AFB .....................
$33,000,000 
Luke AFB .....................................
$24,000,000 
California ...........................
Travis AFB ...................................
$22,000,000 
Vandenberg AFB ..........................
$14,200,000 
Colorado ............................
U.S. Air Force Academy ...............
$13,400,000 
Delaware ............................
Dover AFB ....................................
$2,800,000 
Kansas ...............................
Fort Riley ......................................
$7,600,000 
Louisiana ...........................
Barksdale AFB .............................
$23,500,000 
Missouri .............................
Whiteman AFB .............................
$4,800,000 
North Carolina ..................
Pope AFB .....................................
$6,000,000 
North Dakota ....................
Minot AFB ....................................
$67,800,000 
Nebraska ...........................
Offutt AFB ...................................
$564,000,000 
New Mexico .......................
Cannon AFB .................................
$22,598,000 
Holloman AFB ..............................
$29,200,000 
Kirtland AFB ................................
$25,000,000 
Nevada ...............................
Nellis AFB ....................................
$35,850,000 
Texas .................................
JB San Antonio ............................
$64,000,000 
Joint Base San Antonio ................
$46,000,000 
Utah ..................................
Hill AFB .......................................
$23,300,000 
Virginia ..............................
JB Langley Eustis ........................
$50,000,000 
Washington ........................
Fairchild AFB ...............................
$27,600,000 
Various Locations ...............
Unspecified ....................................
$60,000,000
946 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304 and available for military construc-
tion projects outside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Greenland ..................................
Thule AB ...................................
$28,000,000 
Guam ........................................
Joint Region Marianas ..............
$211,600,000 
Germany ...................................
Ramstein AB .............................
$34,697,000 
Italy ..........................................
Sigonella ....................................
$15,000,000 
Korea, Republic Of ...................
Osan AB ....................................
$23,000,000 
Qatar .........................................
Al Udeid .....................................
$37,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for 
military family housing functions as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construc-
tion or improvement of family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $4,208,000.
947 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and avail-
able for military family housing functions as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Air Force may improve existing military family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $80,596,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for mili-
tary construction, land acquisition, and military family 
housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as 
specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY 
OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2636) for Hickam Air Force Base, Ha-
waii, for construction of a Ground Control Tower at the 
installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 
43 vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 square 
meters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s
948 
construction guidelines for control towers, using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations 
in prior years. 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 
4658), the authorization set forth in the table in sub-
section (b), as provided in section 2301(b) of that Act 
(122 Stat. 4679), shall remain in effect until October 1, 
2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, which-
ever is later: 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
Location 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Germany ..........
Spangdahlem Air 
Base ...................
Child Development Center 
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2307. LIMITATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSOLI-
DATION OF AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS 
CENTER OF THE AIR FORCE. 
(a) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.— 
(1) NOTICE AND WAIT.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may not disestablish, close, or realign any
949 
element of the Air and Space Operations Center con-
solidation initiative until— 
(A) the Secretary of Air Force submits a 
notice of the proposed disestablishment, closure, 
or realignment to the congressional defense 
committees; and 
(B) the expiration of a period of 15 legisla-
tive days or 30 calendar days, whichever is 
longer, beginning on the date of the notification 
is received by the committees. 
(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Air 
Force shall prepare a notice under paragraph (1) in 
consultation with the commanders of the combatant 
commands. 
(3) LEGISLATIVE DAY DEFINED.—In this sub-
section, term ‘‘legislative day’’ means a day on which 
either House of Congress is in session. 
(b) CONTENT OF NOTICE.—The notice under sub-
section (a) shall contain at a minimum— 
(1) an explanation of the projected savings of 
the proposed disestablishment, closure, or realign-
ment; 
(2) a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed dis-
establishment, closure, or realignment;
950 
(3) the budgetary impact of the proposed dis-
establishment, closure, or realignment; 
(4) the strategic and operational consequences 
of the proposed disestablishment, closure, or realign-
ment; 
(5) an appropriate local economic assessment of 
the proposed disestablishment, closure, or realign-
ment, which shall include at a minimum— 
(A) a list of Federal, State, and local gov-
ernment departments and agencies that are re-
quired by statute or regulation to provide as-
sistance and outreach for the community af-
fected by the proposed disestablishment, clo-
sure, or realignment; and 
(B) a list of the contractors and businesses 
affected by the proposed disestablishment, clo-
sure, or realignment; and 
(6) a continuity of operations plan for the pro-
posed disestablishment, closure, or realignment. 
SEC. 2308. ADDITIONAL BUDGET ITEMS RELATING TO AIR 
FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) SUPPORTING FACILITIES.—Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 2304, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
951 
retary of the Air Force shall obligate an additional 
$10,000,000 for supporting facilities in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(b) OPERATIONAL FACILITIES.—Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 2304, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of the Air Force shall obligate an additional 
$20,000,000 for operational facilities in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(c) COMMUNITY FACILITIES.—Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 2304, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in section 4601, the 
Secretary of the Air Force shall obligate an additional 
$20,000,000 for community facilities in furtherance of na-
tional security objectives. 
(d) MAINTENANCE AND PRODUCTION FACILITIES.— 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
2304, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
division D, the Secretary of the Air Force shall obligate 
an additional $10,000,000 for maintenance and produc-
tion facilities in furtherance of national security objectives. 
(e) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in this section with or to a specific entity shall—
952 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403 and available for military construc-
tion projects inside the United States as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ................................
Anchorage .....................................
$18,400,000 
Eielson AFB .................................
$14,800,000 
Alabama ............................
Redstone Arsenal ..........................
$58,800,000 
Arizona ..............................
Davis-Monthan AFB .....................
$23,000,000 
California ...........................
Camp Pendleton ............................
$12,141,000
953 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Coronado .......................................
$42,000,000 
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy 
$15,500,000 
San Clemente ................................
$21,800,000 
Colorado ............................
Buckley AFB ................................
$140,932,000 
District of Columbia ..........
Bolling AFB ..................................
$16,736,000 
Florida ...............................
Eglin AFB ....................................
$51,600,000 
Eglin AUX 9 .................................
$9,500,000 
MacDill AFB .................................
$15,200,000 
Whiting Field ................................
$3,800,000 
Georgia ..............................
Fort Benning ................................
$37,205,000 
Fort Gordon ..................................
$11,340,000 
Fort Stewart .................................
$72,300,000 
Hawaii ...............................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
$14,400,000 
Illinois ................................
Great Lakes ..................................
$16,900,000 
Kentucky ...........................
Fort Campbell ...............................
$138,500,000 
Fort Knox .....................................
$38,845,000 
Louisiana ...........................
Barksdale AFB .............................
$6,200,000 
Massachusetts ...................
Hanscom AFB ..............................
$34,040,000 
Westover ARB ...............................
$23,300,000 
Maryland .............................
Bethesda Naval Hospital ..............
$18,000,000 
Fort Meade ...................................
$860,579,000 
Joint Base Andrews ......................
$265,700,000 
Missouri .............................
Arnold ...........................................
$9,253,000 
Mississippi .........................
Columbus AFB .............................
$2,600,000 
Gulfport .........................................
$34,700,000 
North Carolina ..................
Camp Lejeune ...............................
$6,670,000 
Fort Bragg ....................................
$206,274,000 
New River .....................................
$22,687,000 
Pope AFB .....................................
$5,400,000 
New Mexico .......................
Cannon AFB .................................
$132,997,000 
New York ..........................
Fort Drum ....................................
$20,400,000 
Ohio ...................................
Columbus .......................................
$10,000,000 
Oklahoma ..........................
Altus AFB .....................................
$8,200,000 
Pennsylvania ......................
DEF Distribution Depot New 
Cumberland ...............................
$46,000,000 
Philadelphia ...................................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ..................
Joint Base Charleston ...................
$24,868,000 
Texas ..................................
Joint Base San Antonio ................
$194,300,000 
Virginia ..............................
Charlottesville ................................
$10,805,000 
Dahlgren .......................................
$1,988,000 
Dam Neck .....................................
$23,116,000 
Fort Belvoir ..................................
$54,625,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little 
Creek - Story .............................
$37,000,000 
Pentagon .......................................
$8,742,000 
Quantico ........................................
$46,727,000 
Washington ........................
JB Lewis McChord .......................
$35,000,000 
Whidbey Island .............................
$25,000,000 
West Virginia ....................
Camp Dawson ...............................
$2,200,000 
Various Locations ...............
Unspecified ....................................
$50,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403 and available for military construc-
tion projects outside the United States as specified in the
954 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium .............................
Brussels .........................................
$24,118,000 
Germany ............................
Ansbach .........................................
$11,672,000 
Baumholder ...................................
$59,419,000 
Grafenwoehr ..................................
$6,529,000 
Rhine Ordnance Barracks .............
$1,196,650,000 
Spangdalem Air Base ...................
$129,043,000 
Stuttgart-Patch Barracks .............
$2,434,000 
Italy ...................................
Vicenza ..........................................
$41,864,000 
Japan .................................
Yokota Air Base ............................
$61,842,000 
United Kingdom ................
Menwith Hill Station ....................
$68,601,000 
Royal Air Force Alconbury ...........
$35,030,000 
SEC. 
2402. 
AUTHORIZED 
ENERGY 
CONSERVATION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403 and available for energy conservation 
projects inside the United States as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may 
carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 
of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, 
set forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ...............................
Davis-Monthan AFB .....................
$4,650,000 
California ............................
Presidio of Monterey .....................
$5,000,000 
Colorado ..............................
Fort Carson ...................................
$4,277,000 
Florida ................................
Tyndall AFB .................................
$3,255,000
955 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States— 
Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Georgia ...............................
MCLB Albany ...............................
$3,504,000 
Massachusetts .....................
Hanscom AFB ..............................
$3,609,000 
New York ............................
Fort Drum ....................................
$3,500,000 
North Carolina ...................
Fort Bragg ....................................
$13,400,000 
North Carolina ...................
Camp Lejeune ...............................
$6,925,000 
Oklahoma ............................
Altus AFB .....................................
$5,700,000 
Tennessee ...........................
Arnold AFB ..................................
$3,300,000 
Utah ....................................
Tooele Army Depot .......................
$8,200,000 
Wyoming .............................
FE Warren AFB ..........................
$12,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403 and available for energy conservation 
projects outside the United States as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may 
carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 
of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or 
locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, 
set forth in the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ..................................
NB Guam ......................................
$17,377,000 
Marshall Islands .................
Kwajalein Atoll ..............................
$6,300,000 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DE-
FENSE AGENCIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for mili-
tary construction, land acquisition, and military family 
housing functions of the Department of Defense (other
956 
than the military departments), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. ADDITIONAL BUDGET ITEMS RELATING TO DE-
FENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS.—Of the amounts au-
thorized to be appropriated by section 2403, as specified 
in the corresponding funding table in division D, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall obligate an additional $40,000,000 
for defense access roads in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(b) SPECIAL OPERATION FORCES LAND ACQUISI-
TION.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
section 2403, as specified in the corresponding funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense shall obli-
gate an additional $10,000,000 for Special Operation 
Forces land acquisition in furtherance of national security 
objectives. 
(c) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 
decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to 
in this section with or to a specific entity shall— 
(1) be based on merit-based selection proce-
dures in accordance with the requirements of sec-
tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 
Code, or on competitive procedures; and
957 
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of 
law. 
Subtitle B—Chemical 
Demilitarization Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEM-
ICAL 
DEMILITARIZATION 
CONSTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for mili-
tary construction and land acquisition for chemical demili-
tarization, as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC 
TREATY ORGANIZATION SE-
CURITY 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of— 
(1) the amount authorized to be appropriated 
pursuant to section 2502 and available for this pur-
958 
pose as specified in the funding table in section 
4601; and 
(2) the amount collected from the North Atlan-
tic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 
previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for con-
tributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 
of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United 
States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization Security Investment Program authorized by 
section 2501, as specified in the funding table in section 
4601. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD RESERVE 
FORCES FACILITIES 
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations 
and Authorization of Appropria-
tions 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2606 and available for the National Guard
959 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real prop-
erty and carry out military construction projects for the 
Army National Guard locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama .................
Fort McClellan .............................................
$16,500,000 
Arkansas .................
Fort Chaffee .................................................
$3,500,000 
Arizona ...................
Papago Military Reservation ........................
$17,800,000 
California ................
Camp Roberts ..............................................
$38,160,000 
Camp San Luis Obispo ................................
$8,000,000 
Colorado .................
Alamosa ........................................................
$6,400,000 
Aurora ..........................................................
$3,600,000 
Fort Carson ..................................................
$43,000,000 
District of Columbia 
Anacostia ......................................................
$5,300,000 
Florida ....................
Camp Blanding ............................................
$5,500,000 
Georgia ...................
Atlanta .........................................................
$11,000,000 
Hinesville ......................................................
$17,500,000 
Macon ...........................................................
$14,500,000 
Hawaii ....................
Kalaeloa ........................................................
$33,000,000 
Illinois .....................
Normal .........................................................
$10,000,000 
Indiana ...................
Camp Atterbury ...........................................
$81,900,000 
Indianapolis ..................................................
$25,700,000 
Massachusetts ........
Natick ...........................................................
$9,000,000 
Maryland ................
Dundalk ........................................................
$16,000,000 
La Plata .......................................................
$9,000,000 
Westminster .................................................
$10,400,000 
Maine ......................
Bangor .........................................................
$15,600,000 
Brunswick ....................................................
$23,000,000 
Minnesota ...............
Camp Ripley .................................................
$8,400,000 
Mississippi ..............
Camp Shelby ................................................
$64,600,000 
North Carolina .......
Greensboro ...................................................
$3,700,000 
Nebraska ................
Grand Island ................................................
$22,000,000 
Mead .............................................................
$9,100,000 
New Jersey .............
Lakehurst .....................................................
$49,000,000 
New Mexico ............
Santa Fe ......................................................
$5,200,000 
Nevada ....................
Las Vegas .....................................................
$23,000,000 
Oklahoma ...............
Camp Gruber ...............................................
$13,361,000 
Oregon ....................
The Dalles ....................................................
$13,800,000 
South Carolina .......
Allendale .......................................................
$4,300,000 
Utah .......................
Camp Williams .............................................
$6,500,000 
Virginia ...................
Fort Pickett .................................................
$11,000,000 
Wisconsin ...............
Camp Williams .............................................
$7,000,000 
West Virginia .........
Buckhannon .................................................
$10,000,000 
Wyoming .................
Cheyenne ......................................................
$8,900,000 
Various Locations ....
Unspecified ...................................................
$50,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2606 and available for the National Guard
960 
and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real prop-
erty and carry out military construction projects for the 
Army National Guard locations outside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Puerto Rico .....................
Fort Buchanan ....................................
$57,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for 
the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army Reserve 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
California ........................
Fort Hunter Liggett ............................
$5,200,000 
Colorado ..........................
Fort Collins .........................................
$13,600,000 
Illinois .............................
Homewood ...........................................
$16,000,000 
Rockford ..............................................
$12,800,000 
Indiana ............................
Lawrence .............................................
$57,000,000 
Kansas ............................
Kansas City .........................................
$13,000,000 
Massachusetts .................
Attleboro ..............................................
$22,000,000 
Minnesota ........................
Saint Joseph ........................................
$11,800,000 
Missouri ..........................
Weldon Springs ...................................
$19,000,000 
North Carolina ................
Greensboro ...........................................
$19,000,000 
New York ........................
Schenectady .........................................
$20,000,000 
South Carolina ................
Orangeburg ..........................................
$12,000,000 
Wisconsin ........................
Fort McCoy .........................................
$27,300,000