datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(2) in the case of a statement described in 
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), is a statement 
in which the person making, presenting, or submit-
ting such statement has a duty to include such ma-
terial fact; and 
‘‘(3) contains or is accompanied by an express 
certification or affirmation of the truthfulness and 
accuracy of the contents of the statement, shall be 
subject to, in addition to any other remedy that may 
be prescribed by law, a civil penalty of not more 
than $5,000 for each such statement. 
‘‘§ 2753. Hearing and determinations 
‘‘(a) TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE TO ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL.—If a responsible official determines that there is 
adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under 
section 2752 of this title, the responsible official shall 
transmit to the Attorney General, or any other officer or 
employee of the Department of Justice designated by the 
Attorney General, a written notice of the intention of such 
official to initiate an action under this section. The notice 
shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) A statement of the reasons for initiating 
an action under this section. 
‘‘(2) A statement specifying the evidence which 
supports liability under section 2752 of this title. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(3) A description of the claims or statements 
for which liability under section 2752 of this title is 
alleged. 
‘‘(4) An estimate of the penalties and assess-
ments that will be demanded under section 2752 of 
this title. 
‘‘(5) A statement of any exculpatory or miti-
gating circumstances which may relate to such 
claims or statements. 
‘‘(b) STATEMENT FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL.— 
‘‘(1) Within 90 days after receipt of a notice 
from a responsible official under subsection (a), the 
Attorney General, or any other officer or employee 
of the Department of Justice designated by the At-
torney General, shall transmit a written statement 
to the responsible official which specifies— 
‘‘(A) that the Attorney General, or any 
other officer or employee of the Department of 
Justice designated by the Attorney General, ap-
proves or disapproves initiating an action under 
this section based on the allegations of liability 
stated in such notice; and 
‘‘(B) in any case in which the initiation of 
an action under this section is disapproved, the 
reasons for such disapproval. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(2) If at any time after the initiation of an ac-
tion under this section the Attorney General, or any 
other officer or employee of the Department of Jus-
tice designated by the Attorney General, transmits 
to a responsible official a written determination that 
the continuation of any action under this section 
may adversely affect any pending or potential crimi-
nal or civil action, such action shall be immediately 
stayed and may be resumed only upon written au-
thorization from the Attorney General, or any other 
officer or employee of the Department of Justice 
designated by the Attorney General. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF CLAIM THAT MAY 
BE PURSUED UNDER THIS SECTION.—No action shall be 
initiated under this section, nor shall any assessment be 
imposed under this section, if the total amount of the 
claim determined by the responsible official to violate sec-
tion 2752(a) of this title exceeds $500,000. The $500,000 
threshold does not include penalties or any assessment 
permitted under 2752(a) of this title greater than the 
amount of the claim determined by the responsible official 
to violate such section. 
‘‘(d) PROCEDURES
FOR RESOLVING CLAIMS.—(1) 
Upon receiving approval under subsection (b) to initiate 
an action under this section, the responsible official shall 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
mail, by registered or certified mail, or other similar com-
mercial means, or shall deliver, a notice to the person al-
leged to be liable under section 2752 of this title. Such 
notice shall specify the allegations of liability against such 
person, specify the total amount of penalties and assess-
ments sought by the United States, advise the person of 
the opportunity to submit facts and arguments in opposi-
tion to the allegations set forth in the notice, advise the 
person of the opportunity to submit offers of settlement 
or proposals of adjustment, and advise the person of the 
procedures of the agency named in section 2751(a) of this 
title governing the resolution of actions initiated under 
this section. 
‘‘(2) Within 30 days after receiving a notice under 
paragraph (1), or any additional period of time granted 
by the responsible official, the respondent may submit in 
person, in writing, or through a representative, facts and 
arguments in opposition to the allegations set forth in the 
notice, including any additional information that raises a 
genuine dispute of material fact. 
‘‘(3) If the respondent fails to respond within 30 
days, or any additional time granted by the responsible 
official, the responsible official may issue a written deci-
sion disposing of the matters raised in the notice. Such 
decision shall be based on the record before the responsible 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
official. If the responsible official concludes that the re-
spondent is liable under section 2752 of this title, the deci-
sion shall include the findings of fact and conclusions of 
law which the responsible official relied upon in deter-
mining that the respondent is liable, and the amount of 
any penalty and/or assessment to be imposed on the re-
spondent. Any such determination shall be based on a pre-
ponderance of the evidence. The responsible official shall 
promptly send to the respondent a copy of the decision 
by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial 
means, or shall hand deliver a copy of the decision. 
‘‘(4) If the respondent makes a timely submission, 
and the responsible official determines that the respondent 
has not raised any genuine dispute of material fact, the 
responsible official may issue a written decision disposing 
of the matters raised in the notice. Such decision shall 
be based on the record before the responsible official. If 
the responsible official concludes that the respondent is 
liable under section 2752 of this title, the decision shall 
include the findings of fact and conclusions of law which 
the responsible official relied upon in determining that the 
respondent is liable, and the amount of any penalty or as-
sessment to be imposed on the respondent. Any such de-
termination shall be based on a preponderance of the evi-
dence. The responsible official shall promptly send to the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
respondent a copy of the decision by registered or certified 
mail, or other similar commercial means, or shall hand 
deliver a copy of the decision. 
‘‘(5) If the respondent makes a timely submission, 
and the responsible official determines that the respondent 
has raised a genuine dispute of material fact, the respon-
sible official shall commence a hearing to resolve the genu-
inely disputed material facts by mailing by registered or 
certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or by 
hand delivery of, a notice informing the respondent of— 
‘‘(A) the time, place, and nature of the hearing; 
‘‘(B) the legal authority under which the hear-
ing is to be held; 
‘‘(C) the material facts determined by the re-
sponsible official to be genuinely in dispute that will 
be the subject of the hearing; and 
‘‘(D) a description of the procedures for the 
conduct of the hearing. 
‘‘(6) The responsible official and any person against 
whom liability is asserted under this chapter may agree 
to a compromise or settle an action at any time. Any com-
promise or settlement must be in writing. 
‘‘(e) RESPONDENT ENTITLED
TO COPY
OF
THE 
RECORD.—At any time after receiving a notice under 
paragraph (1) of subsection (d), the respondent shall be 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:01 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1735.IH
H1735
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 5 EH
(2) with full recognition of the constitutional
right of the House of Representatives and the Sen-
ate to change such rules at anytime, in the same
manner, and to the same extent as in the case of
any other rule of the House of Representatives or
the Senate, respectively.
SEC. 304. CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF CON-
TENTS.
Section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget and Im-
poundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by inserting
‘‘PART A—GENERAL PROVISIONS’’ before the item relat-
ing to section 401 and by inserting after the item relating
to section 407 the following:
‘‘PART B—FEDERAL MANDATES
‘‘Sec. 421. Definitions.
‘‘Sec. 422. Limitation on application.
‘‘Sec. 423. Duties of congressional committees.
‘‘Sec. 424. Duties of the Director.
‘‘Sec. 425. Point of order.
‘‘Sec. 426. Enforcement in the House of Representatives.’’.
SEC. 305. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The State and Local
Government Cost Estimate Act of 1981 (Public Law 97–
108) is repealed.
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 403 of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended to read as
follows:
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 562
AN ACT
To modify the boundaries of Walnut Canyon National
Monument in the State of Arizona.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Walnut Canyon
National Monument Boundary Modification Act of 1995’’.
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 562
AN ACT
To modify the boundaries of Walnut Canyon
National Monument in the State of Arizona.
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 562
To modify the boundaries of Walnut Canyon National Monument in the
State of Arizona.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 18, 1995
Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
To modify the boundaries of Walnut Canyon National
Monument in the State of Arizona.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Walnut Canyon
National Monument Boundary Modification Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that:
(1) Walnut Canyon National Monument was es-
tablished for the preservation and interpretation of
certain settlements and land use patterns associated
with the prehistoric Sinaguan culture of northern
Arizona.
(2) Major cultural resources associated with the
purposes of Walnut Canyon National Monument are
near the boundary and are currently managed under
multiple-use objectives of the adjacent national for-
est. These concentrations of cultural resources, often
referred to as ‘‘forts’’, would be more effectively
managed as part of the National Park System.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to modify
the boundaries of the Walnut Canyon National Monument
(hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘national monu-
ment’’) to improve management of the national monument
and associated resources.
SEC. 3. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.
Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, the
boundaries of the national monument shall be modified as
depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Boundary Proposal—Wal-
nut Canyon National Monument, Coconino County, Ari-
zona’’, numbered 360/80,011, and dated September 1994.
Such map shall be on file and available for public inspec-
tion in the offices of the Director of the National Park
Service, Department of the Interior.
SEC. 4. ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF PROPERTY.
The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire
lands and interest in lands within the national monument,
by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds,
or exchange. Federal property within the boundaries of the
national monument (as modified by this Act) is hereby
transferred to the administrative jurisdiction of the Sec-
retary of the Interior for management as part of the na-
tional monument. Federal property excluded from the
monument pursuant to the boundary modification under
section 3 is hereby transferred to the administrative juris-
diction of the Secretary of Agriculture to be managed as
a part of the Coconino National Forest.
SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATION.
The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di-
rector of the National Park Service, shall manage the na-
tional monument in accordance with this Act and the pro-
visions of law generally applicable to units of the National
Park Service, including ‘‘An Act to establish a National
Park Service, and for other purposes’’ approved August
25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1, 2–4).
Æ
IIA
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 562
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MARCH 15, 1995
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources
AN ACT
To modify the boundaries of Walnut Canyon National
Monument in the State of Arizona.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Walnut Canyon
National Monument Boundary Modification Act of 1995’’.
HR 562 RFS
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that:
(1) Walnut Canyon National Monument was es-
tablished for the preservation and interpretation of
certain settlements and land use patterns associated
with the prehistoric Sinaguan culture of northern
Arizona.
(2) Major cultural resources associated with the
purposes of Walnut Canyon National Monument are
near the boundary and are currently managed under
multiple-use objectives of the adjacent national for-
est. These concentrations of cultural resources, often
referred to as ‘‘forts’’, would be more effectively
managed as part of the National Park System.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to modify
the boundaries of the Walnut Canyon National Monument
(hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘national monu-
ment’’) to improve management of the national monument
and associated resources.
SEC. 3. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.
Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, the
boundaries of the national monument shall be modified as
depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Boundary Proposal—Wal-
nut Canyon National Monument, Coconino County, Ari-
zona’’, numbered 360/80,010, and dated September 1994.
Such map shall be on file and available for public inspec-
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 870
To resolve the current labor dispute involving Major League Baseball, and
for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 8, 1995
Mr. WILLIAMS (for himself and Mr. BONIOR) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Op-
portunities
A BILL
To resolve the current labor dispute involving Major League
Baseball, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Major League Baseball
Restoration Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that—
(1) Major League Baseball is a multibillion dol-
lar activity that affects both interstate and foreign
commerce;
HR 870 IH
(2) the Major League Baseball labor-manage-
ment dispute caused the premature termination of
the 1994 baseball season, the cancellation of the
1994 League Championship Series and the 1994
World Series, and threatens the 1995 spring train-
ing and baseball season;
(3) the dispute has caused serious economic
damage to the cities and communities in which
major league franchises are located and threatens to
economically damage the communities that host
spring training;
(4) many American workers who are not parties
to the negotiation depend on Major League Baseball
for an essential part of their livelihood;
(5) after a year of contentious negotiations, the
parties to the dispute appear to be incapable of
reaching a settlement on their own, even with the
assistance of skilled mediation;
(6) because of its unique history and tradition,
Major League Baseball occupies a special place in
the lives of Americans, and particularly its youth;
and
(7) apart from its economic significance, the
impact of Major League Baseball on American life
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 563
To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to prohibit the inclusion
of certain sites on the National Register of Historic Places, and for
other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 18, 1995
Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
A BILL
To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to prohibit
the inclusion of certain sites on the National Register
of Historic Places, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR INCLUSION ON NATIONAL
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
Section 101(a)(6) of the National Historic Preserva-
tion Act (16 U.S.C. 470 and following) is amended by in-
serting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(6)’’ and by adding the following at
the end thereof:
‘‘(B) After the date of the enactment of this subpara-
graph, any unimproved or unmodified natural landscape
feature which does not contain artifacts or other physical
evidence of human activity that have unique significance
in history or pre-history shall not be—
‘‘(i) eligible for inclusion on the National Reg-
ister of Historic Places;
‘‘(ii) included on the National Register of His-
toric Places; or
‘‘(iii) considered to be a historic or pre-historic
property or historic resource for purposes of this Act
or any other Federal law.
Nothing in this subparagraph shall invalidate or otherwise
affect any determination made under this Act or under
any other Federal law prior to the enactment of this sub-
paragraph with respect to any site.’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF DESIGNATION OF MT. SHASTA
The Mt. Shasta area in the State of California, as
generally depicted on the United States Forest Service
map entitled ‘‘Geographic Limits Multiple Property Form
Mt. Shasta Native American Culture and History’’, num-
bered 1, and dated April 1993, may not be designated by
any agency or authority of the United States as a historic
district, historic site or national monument under the Na-
tional Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 and fol-
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 564
To provide that receipts and disbursements of the Highway Trust Fund,
the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, the Inland Waterways Trust Fund,
and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund shall not be included in the
totals of the budget of the United States Government as submitted
by the President or the congressional budget.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 18, 1995
Mr. KIM (for himself and Mr. SHUSTER) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
and, in addition, to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
DECEMBER 6, 1995
The Committee on Government Reform and Oversight discharged
DECEMBER 6, 1995
Rereferred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently de-
termined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To provide that receipts and disbursements of the Highway
Trust Fund, the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, the
Inland Waterways Trust Fund, and the Harbor Mainte-
nance Trust Fund shall not be included in the totals
(1) of the Highway Trust Fund are the dis-
bursements, and the receipts allocable to such dis-
bursements, under—
(A) paragraph (1) of section 9503(c) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to
expenditures from the Highway Trust Fund for
the Federal-aid highway program), and
(B) paragraph (3) of section 9503(e) of
such Code (relating to expenditures from the
Mass Transit Account);
(2) of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund are
the disbursements, and the receipts allocable to such
disbursements, under paragraph (1) of section
9502(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re-
lating to expenditures from the Airport and Airway
Trust Fund for the airport and airway program);
(3) of the Inland Waterways Trust Fund are
the disbursements, and the receipts allocable to such
disbursements, under section 9506(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the expenditures
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund for naviga-
tion construction and rehabilitation projects on in-
land waterways); and
(4) of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund are
the disbursements, and the receipts allocable to such
disbursements, under section 9505(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the expenditures
from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for oper-
ation and maintenance of those portions of the Saint
Lawrence Seaway operated and maintained by the
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
and harbors and inland harbors within the United
States).
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1995.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 565
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to retroactively restore and
make permanent the exclusion for amounts received under group legal
services plans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 18, 1995
Mr. MOAKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to retroactively
restore and make permanent the exclusion for amounts
received under group legal services plans.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR
EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP LEGAL SERV-
ICES PLANS.
(a) GENERAL RULE.—Section 120 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection
(e) (relating to termination) and by redesignating sub-
section (f) as subsection (e).
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of
section 104 of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is amended
by striking paragraph (2).
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1991.
Æ
314 
† HR 1735 PAP1S 
(B) a description of any actions taken by 
the Secretary of the military department con-
cerned in response to such event, including any 
actions taken to hold individuals accountable. 
(3) The number of practitioners providing health 
care in military medical treatment facilities that 
were reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank 
during the year preceding the submittal of the report. 
(4) The results of any internal analyses con-
ducted by the Patient Safety Center of the Depart-
ment of Defense during such year on matters relating 
to patient safety at military medical treatment facili-
ties. 
(5) With respect to each military medical treat-
ment facility— 
(A) the current accreditation status of such 
facility, including any recommendations for cor-
rective action made by the relevant accrediting 
body; 
(B) any policies or procedures implemented 
during such year by the Secretary of the mili-
tary department concerned that were designed to 
improve patient safety, quality of care, and ac-
cess to care at such facility;