datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(l) It shall be unlawful for any person to manufac-
ture any plastic explosive which does not contain a detec-
tion agent.
‘‘(m)(1) it shall be unlawful for any person to import
or bring into the United States, or export from the United
States, any plastic explosive which does not contain a de-
tection agent.
‘‘(2) During the 15-year period that begins with the
date of entry into force of the Convention on the Marking
of Plastic Explosives with respect to the United States,
paragraph (1) shall not apply to the importation or bring-
ing into the United States, or the exportation from the
United States, of any plastic explosive which was im-
ported, brought into, or manufactured in the United
States before the effective date of this subsection by or
on behalf of any agency of the United States performing
military or police functions (including any military Re-
serve component) or by or on behalf of the National Guard
of any State.
‘‘(n)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to ship,
transport, transfer, receive, or possess any plastic explo-
sive which does not contain a detection agent.
‘‘(2)(A) During the 3-year period that begins on the
effective date of this subsection, paragraph (1) shall not
apply to the shipment, transportation, transfer, receipt, or
ing given the term in section 103 of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). 
(25) WRITING.—The term ‘‘writing’’ means— 
(A) the ability to compose meaning and 
print to communicate ideas, including the use of 
vocabulary, tone, and genre to fit purpose, audi-
ence and occasion; 
(B) the use of conventions such as spelling 
and punctuation; and 
(C) the ability to revise in order to improve 
clarity of ideas, coherence, logical development, 
and precision of language use. 
SEC. 14. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this Act— 
(1) $2,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2014; 
(2) $2,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2015; 
(3) $2,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2016; 
(4) $2,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2017; and 
(5) $2,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2018. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:35 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2706.IH
H2706
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
acquire or sell any securities of the United States
if—
(A) the extension of credit is to be repaid
on the same calendar day;
(B) the extension of credit is incidental to
the clearing of transactions in those securities
through that insured depository institution; and
(C) both the principal of and the interest
on the extension of credit are fully secured by
securities of the United States.
(7) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN MARKETABILITY
ACTIVITIES.—No insured depository institution that
is an affiliate of a financial services holding company
shall directly or indirectly extend credit, or issue or
enter into a standby letter of credit, asset purchase
agreement, indemnity, guarantee, insurance, or
other facility, for the purpose of enhancing the mar-
ketability of a securities issue underwritten or dis-
tributed by a securities affiliate.
(8) ACTIVITIES DURING SECURITIES DISTRIBU-
TION.—No insured depository institution that is an
affiliate of a financial services holding company shall
knowingly extend or arrange for the extension of
credit, directly or indirectly, secured by or for the
purpose of purchasing any security while, or for 30
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 896
To improve the ability of the United States to respond to the international
terrorist threat.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 10, 1995
Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. Dicks) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
MARCH 21, 1995
Additional sponsors: Mr. FRAZER, Mr. FROST, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mrs. MEEK
of Florida, Mr. YATES, Mr. WILSON, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. FOX of Penn-
sylvania, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. BARRETT
of Wisconsin, Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO´
A BILL
To improve the ability of the United States to respond to
the international terrorist threat.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This 
Act 
may 
be 
cited 
as 
‘‘the 
Omnibus
Counterterrorism Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.
The following is the table of contents for this Act:
Sec. 1.
Short title.
(1) IN GENERAL.—In approving the integrated 
plan of a municipality under the pilot program, the 
Administrator shall— 
(A) account for the financial capability of 
the municipality to adequately address the re-
quirements of the Federal Water Pollution Con-
trol Act that apply to the municipality; 
(B) prioritize the obligations of the munici-
pality under the Federal Water Pollution Con-
trol Act according to the most cost-effective and 
environmentally beneficial outcomes; 
(C) account for the maintenance, oper-
ational, and regulatory obligations of the mu-
nicipality; and 
(D) enable the municipality to implement 
innovative and flexible approaches to meet the 
obligations of the municipality under the Fed-
eral Water Pollution Control Act. 
(2) USE
OF
ADAPTIVE
MANAGEMENT
AP-
PROACHES.— 
(A) PRIORITY.—In selecting municipalities 
to participate in the program, the Adminis-
trator may give priority to a municipality that 
is seeking to develop and implement an inte-
grated plan that includes adaptive approaches 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:29 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2707.IH
H2707
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
to account for changed or future uncertain cir-
cumstances. 
(B) TYPES OF ADAPTIVE APPROACHES.— 
Adaptive approaches referred to in subpara-
graph (A) include, at a minimum— 
(i) the use of new innovative technical 
or institutional approaches; and 
(ii) the ability to adapt the integrated 
plan in response to new regulatory require-
ments and reductions in financial capa-
bility. 
(3) ADDITIONAL
AUTHORITIES.—In carrying 
out the pilot program, the Administrator may, in full 
coordination and mutual agreement with a munici-
pality selected to participate in the pilot program— 
(A) extend the allowable national pollutant 
discharge elimination system permit term under 
section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) to a maximum of 
25 years, and make corresponding changes to 
any associated implementation schedule; 
(B) modify the implementation terms of a 
consent decree entered into by the municipality 
with the Administrator pursuant to that Act; 
and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:29 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2707.IH
H2707
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1530 EAS/PP——30
HR 1530 EAS/PP——31
HR 1530 EAS/PP——32
HR 1530 EAS/PP——33
HR 1530 EAS/PP——34
HR 1530 EAS/PP——35
HR 1530 EAS/PP——36
HR 1530 EAS/PP——37
HR 1530 EAS/PP——38
HR 1530 EAS/PP——39
HR 1530 EAS/PP——40
HR 1530 EAS/PP——41
HR 1530 EAS/PP——42
HR 1530 EAS/PP——43
HR 1530 EAS/PP——44
HR 1530 EAS/PP——45
HR 1530 EAS/PP——46
HR 1530 EAS/PP——47
HR 1530 EAS/PP——48
HR 1530 EAS/PP——49
HR 1530 EAS/PP——50
HR 1530 EAS/PP——51
HR 1530 EAS/PP——52
HR 1530 EAS/PP——53
HR 1530 EAS/PP——54
HR 1530 EAS/PP——55
HR 1530 EAS/PP——56
HR 1530 EAS/PP——57
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2709 
To extend the Generalized System of Preferences. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 17, 2013 
Mr. CAMP (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. RANGEL) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the Generalized System of Preferences. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 
PREFERENCES. 
Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2465) is amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2013’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
03:29 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2709.IH
H2709
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1530 RFS
traction and ingredient recovery, and underground con-
tained burning.
SEC. 264. FIBER OPTIC ACOUSTIC SENSOR SYSTEM.
(a) FIBER OPTIC ACOUSTIC SENSOR SYSTEM.—Of
the amount appropriated pursuant to the authorization in
section 201, $28,181,000 shall be available for fiscal year
1996 for the advanced submarine combat systems develop-
ment program (PE 63504N). Of that amount, $6,900,000
shall be available for research and development of a fiber
optic acoustic sensor system, including the development of
common optical towed arrays.
(b) OFFSET.—The amount authorized in section 201
for the advanced submarine systems development program
(PE 63561N) is hereby reduced by $6,900,000.
SEC. 265. JOINT TARGETING SUPPORT SYSTEM TESTBED.
(a) 
JOINT
TARGETING
SUPPORT
SYSTEM
TESTBED.—The amount authorized in section 201(2) for
theater mission planning (project A1784) is hereby in-
creased by $10,000,000, to be used to establish a joint
targeting support system testbed (in PE 0204229N).
(b) OFFSET.—The amount authorized in section
201(2) for the Tomahawk (project A0545) is hereby re-
duced by $10,000,000.
or criminal penalty against, or the collection of an 
unpaid tax, fine, or penalty from, such individual or 
a business owned or operated by such individual, 
shall allow such individual to make an audio record-
ing of such in-person or telephonic interaction at the 
individual’s own expense and with the individual’s 
own equipment. 
‘‘(2) RECORDING BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.— 
Any employee of an Executive agency that is con-
ducting an in-person or a telephonic interaction de-
scribed in paragraph (1) may record that interaction 
if such employee— 
‘‘(A) informs the individual of such record-
ing prior to or at the initiation of the in-person 
or telephonic interaction; and 
‘‘(B) upon request of the individual, pro-
vides the individual with a transcript or copy of 
such recording, but only if the individual pro-
vides reimbursement for the cost of the tran-
scription and reproduction of such transcript or 
copy. 
‘‘(c) EXPLANATIONS OF RIGHTS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any employee of an Execu-
tive agency shall, before or at an initial in-person or 
telephonic interview, audit, investigation, inspection, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2711.IH
H2711
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2710 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to restore 
State sovereignty over public education and parental rights over the 
education of their children. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 17, 2013 
Mr. CULBERSON (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce 
A BILL 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 to restore State sovereignty over public edu-
cation and parental rights over the education of their 
children. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoration of Paren-
tal Rights and State Sovereignty Act of 2013’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2710.IH
H2710
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1530 RFS
extent practicable, such costs as if employees of
the Department of Defense were used in the
provision of the goods and services.
‘‘(B) Amounts for depreciation of capital assets,
set in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
‘‘(C) Amounts necessary to recover the full cost
of the operation of the Defense Finance Accounting
Service.
‘‘(2) Charges for goods and services provided through
the Fund may not include the following amounts:
‘‘(A) Amounts necessary to recover the costs of
a military construction project (as defined in section
2801(b) of this title), other than a minor construc-
tion project financed by the Fund pursuant to sec-
tion 2805(c)(1) of this title.
‘‘(B) Amounts necessary to cover costs incurred
in connection with the closure or realignment of a
military installation.
‘‘(e) CAPITAL ASSET SUBACCOUNT.—(1) Amounts
charged for depreciation of capital assets pursuant to sub-
section (d)(1)(B) shall be credited to a separate capital
asset subaccount established within the Fund.
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2712 
To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
facilities. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 17, 2013 
Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To provide certain requirements for the licensing of 
commercial nuclear facilities. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Power Licens-
ing Reform Act of 2013’’. 
SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 
Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 
U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 
(1) in subsection b., by inserting ‘‘, including 
that the facility does not pose an unreasonable 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2712.IH
H2712
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
258
HR 1530 RFS
‘‘(1) recommend that the person be placed in a
missing status; and
‘‘(2) not later than 48 hours after receiving
such information, transmit that recommendation to
the theater component commander with jurisdiction
over the missing person in accordance with proce-
dures prescribed under section 1501(c) of this title.
‘‘(b) FORWARDING OF RECORDS.—The commander
making the initial assessment shall (in accordance with
procedures prescribed under section 1501(c) of this title)
safeguard and forward for official use any information re-
lating to the whereabouts or status of the person that re-
sult from the preliminary assessment or from actions
taken to locate the person.
‘‘§ 1503. Initial board inquiry; actions of theater com-
ponent commander and head of the
agency
‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT OF BOARD.—Not later than ten
days after receiving notification under section 1502(a)(2)
of this title that a person has been recommended for place-
ment in a missing status, the theater component com-
mander to whom the notification is transmitted shall ap-
point a board to conduct an inquiry into the whereabouts
and status of the person.
threat to persons or the environment because of 
safety or security vulnerabilities (including vulner-
ability to terrorist attacks), and that there exist ade-
quate evacuation plans for emergency events and 
that those plans have been approved by the relevant 
Federal agencies and States within 50 miles of the 
facility’’ after ‘‘by rule establish’’; and 
(2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the 
following: ‘‘Any such renewal shall be subject to the 
same criteria and requirements that would be appli-
cable for an original application for initial construc-
tion, and the Commission shall ensure that any 
changes in the size or distribution of the sur-
rounding population, or seismic or other scientific 
data not available at time of original licensing, have 
not resulted in the facility being located at a site at 
which a new facility would not be allowed to be 
built.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2712.IH
H2712
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2714 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to assign 
to another taxpayer the amount of the unused charitable deduction 
for qualified conservation contributions. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 17, 2013 
Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-
payers to assign to another taxpayer the amount of the 
unused charitable deduction for qualified conservation 
contributions. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Conservation 
Empowerment Act of 2013’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2714.IH
H2714
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ASSIGN UNUSED CHARITABLE DE-
DUCTION FOR QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 
CONTRIBUTIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 170 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to carryover 
of excess contributions) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) EXCESS QUALIFIED CONTRIBUTION CON-
TRIBUTIONS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any amount of the ex-
cess qualified conservation contributions for any 
taxable year may be assigned by the taxpayer to 
any other person. 90 percent of the amount so 
assigned shall be treated as contributions made 
by such other person and not by the taxpayer, 
and the remainder of the amount so assigned 
shall not be treated as charitable contributions. 
‘‘(B) EXCESS
CONSERVATION
CONTRIBU-
TIONS.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 
term ‘excess conservation contributions’ means, 
with respect to any taxable year, the lesser of— 
‘‘(i) the amount which would, by rea-
son of this subsection or any other provi-
sion of this section, be treated as a chari-
table contribution paid in a succeeding tax-
able year, over 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2714.IH
H2714
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1720 RDS
Institute of Museum and Library Services as the Director
of the Institute of Museum and Library Services may des-
ignate, and may authorize successive redelegations of such
functions as may be necessary or appropriate, except that
any delegation of any such functions with respect to librar-
ies shall be made to the Deputy Director of the Office
of Library Services and with respect to museums shall be
made to the Deputy Director of the Office of Museum
Services. No delegation of functions by the Director of the
Institute of Museum and Library Services under this sec-
tion or under any other provision of this section shall re-
lieve such Director of the Institute of Museum and Li-
brary Services of responsibility for the administration of
such functions.
(e) REORGANIZATION.—The Director of the Institute
of Museum and Library Services may allocate or reallocate
any function transferred under subsection (b) among the
officers of the Institute of Museum and Library Services,
and may establish, consolidate, alter, or discontinue such
organizational entities in the Institute of Museum and Li-
brary Services as may be necessary or appropriate.
(f) RULES.—The Director of the Institute of Museum
and Library Services may prescribe, in accordance with
chapters 5 and 6 of title 5, United States Code, such rules
and regulations as the Director of the Institute of Museum
‘‘(ii) the qualified conservation con-
tributions paid (or treated as paid) during 
the taxable year.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
18:10 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2714.IH
H2714
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(5) United States-Israel missile defense co-
operation dates back over two decades with great 
success, such as the Arrow Weapon System, which 
is already protecting Israel. These systems are life- 
saving, war-preventing and the technologies of the 
cooperative programs belong to both the United 
States and Israel. 
(6) United States industries are equal partners 
in the development of the cooperative systems, which 
creates employment opportunities in the United 
States and Israel. All technical milestones to date 
have been met on time. 
(7) 
The 
David’s 
Sling 
Weapon 
System 
(DSWS), in joint development by the United States 
and Israel, is being designed to intercept short-range 
and medium-range ballistic missiles, long-range 
rockets, and cruise missiles. 
(8) The David’s Sling Weapon System success-
fully intercepted an inert medium-range rocket in 
November 2012, and defense officials expect the pro-
gram to be fully operational as planned on time. 
(9) The Arrow 3 Weapon System, in joint de-
velopment by the United States and Israel, is being 
designed to intercept long-range missiles in high alti-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:54 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2717.IH
H2717
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HR 1530 RFS
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A—Authorization of
Appropriations
SEC. 101. ARMY.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 1996 for procurement for the Army as follows:
(1) For aircraft, $1,423,067,000.
(2) For missiles, $862,830,000.
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles,
$1,359,664,000.
(4) For ammunition, $1,062,715,000.
(5) For other procurement, $2,545,587,000.
SEC. 102. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.
(a) NAVY.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 1996 for procurement for the Navy
as follows:
(1) For aircraft, $4,106,488,000.
(2) For weapons, including missiles and tor-
pedoes, $1,626,411,000.
(3) 
For 
shipbuilding 
and 
conversion,
$6,227,958,000.
(4) For other procurement, $2,461,472,000.
tivities related to security-related technologies. The report 
shall include— 
(1) information on the extent to which — 
(A) the execution of such testing and eval-
uation activities is aligned, temporally and oth-
erwise, with the Administration’s acquisition 
needs, planned procurements, and acquistions 
for technology programs and projects; and 
(B) the extent to which security-related 
technologies that have been tested, evaluated, 
and certified for use by the Administration are 
not procured by the Administration, including 
information about why that occurs; and 
(2) recommendations to— 
(A) improve the efficiency and efficacy of 
such testing and evaluation activities; and 
(B) better align such testing and evalua-
tion with the acquisitions process. 
SEC. 7. NO ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA-
TIONS. 
No additional funds are authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this Act and the amendments made 
by this Act, and this Act and such amendments shall be
carried out using amounts otherwise available for such 
purpose. 
Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 
2013. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 2719 
AN ACT 
To require the Transportation Security Administra-
tion to implement best practices and improve 
transparency with regard to technology acquisi-
tion programs, and for other purposes.
tion Officer, and the Under Secretary for Science and 
Technology. 
‘‘(c) CONTENTS OF PLAN.—The multiyear acquisi-
tion plan shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) An analysis of transportation security 
risks and the associated technology gaps, including 
consideration of the most recent Quadrennial Home-
land Security Review under section 707. 
‘‘(2) A set of transportation security-related 
technology acquisition needs that— 
‘‘(A) is prioritized based on risk and gaps 
identified under paragraph (1); and 
‘‘(B) includes technology acquisition road-
maps with defined objectives, goals, and meas-
ures. 
‘‘(3) An identification of test, evaluation, mod-
eling, and simulation capabilities that will be re-
quired to support the acquisition of the security-re-
lated technologies to meet those needs. 
‘‘(4) An identification of opportunities for pub-
lic-private partnerships, small and disadvantaged 
company participation, intragovernment collabora-
tion, university centers of excellence, and national 
laboratory technology transfer. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
02:10 Jul 20, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2719.IH
H2719
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS