datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5059
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to stored electronic 
communications. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 9, 2004
Mr. SHERMAN (for himself, Mr. CASE, and Mr. ETHERIDGE) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 
stored electronic communications.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Privacy Pro-
tection Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 121 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘§ 2713. Improper access by service provider 
‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Except as provided in subsection 
(b), whoever, being a provider of electronic communication 
service, intentionally accesses the contents of a stored elec-
tronic communication while held in electronic storage by 
that provider shall be fined not more than $5,000. 
‘‘(b) EXCEPTIONS.—It is not an offense under sub-
section (a) if the access is a necessary incident to the ren-
dition of the electronic communication service or compli-
ance with section 2702.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 121 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
item:
‘‘2713. Improper access by service provider.’’.
Æ
tees a certification in accordance with paragraph (3) of
section 12(a) of the Sudan Peace Act (as added by section
5(a)(1) of this Act).
(c) REINSTATEMENT OF SANCTIONS.—The President
shall reinstate the sanctions listed in subsection (a) that
have been suspended under subsection (b) if at any time
the President determines and certifies to the appropriate
congressional committees that the Government of Sudan
is no longer in compliance with any of the criteria listed
in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of section 12(a)(3) of
the Sudan Peace Act (as added by section 5(a)(1) of this
Act).
(d) WAIVER.—The President may waive the applica-
tion of subsection (a) if the President determines and cer-
tifies to the appropriate congressional committees that
such a waiver is in the national interest of the United
States.
(e) CONTINUATION OF RESTRICTIONS.—Restrictions
against the Government of Sudan that were imposed pur-
suant to title III and sections 508, 512, and 527 of the
Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Pro-
grams Act, 2004 (division D of Public Law 108–199; 118
Stat. 143), or any other similar provision of law, may not
be lifted pursuant to such provisions of law unless the
President transmits a certification to the appropriate con-
‘‘(B) already maintains a credit card ac-
count under an open end consumer credit 
plan.’’. 
Æ
HR 5061 RDS 
Government of Sudan fail to fully comply with Secu-
rity Council Resolutions 1556 and 1564. 
(18) The African Union’s commitment to con-
flict resolution and peacekeeping on the continent, 
and its mandate to prevent genocide, has led the or-
ganization to engage in both political and military 
action in an effort to end the conflict in the Darfur 
region. 
(19) The SPLM should seek to play a construc-
tive role in bringing about a political settlement be-
tween the Government of Sudan, the SLA, and the 
JEM. 
(20) Practical implementation of a comprehen-
sive peace agreement for Sudan, as envisioned in the 
Sudan Peace Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 note), and in the 
Machakos Protocol of 2002, is hampered by the on-
going violence in the Darfur region and by the Gov-
ernment of Sudan’s complicity in the violence. 
(21) The Government of Sudan’s complicity in 
the atrocities in the Darfur region raises funda-
mental questions about the Government of Sudan’s 
commitment to peace and stability in Sudan.
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 673 
To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
of Hazel M. Johnson, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 1, 2021 
Mr. RUSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Oversight and Reform 
A BILL 
To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage 
stamp in honor of Hazel M. Johnson, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazel M. Johnson Me-
morial Stamp Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following: 
(1) Hazel Johnson fought for environmental 
justice in Chicago beginning in the 1970s and con-
tinuing through the rest of her life. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:13 Feb 21, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H673.IH
H673
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
(2) When Johnson discovered that the South 
Side of Chicago had the highest cancer rate of any 
area in Chicago, she was inspired to investigate the 
cancer rates, foul odors, and number of children 
with respiratory illnesses in her own neighborhood, 
the community of Altgeld Gardens on the South 
Side of Chicago. 
(3) Johnson discovered her community, Altgeld 
Gardens, which is a public housing project, was built 
on a landfill surrounded by toxicity, which polluted 
the air, water, and land. 
(4) Additionally, the Altgeld Gardens homes 
had asbestos and elevated lead levels. 
(5) This discovery inspired Johnson to create 
the People for Community Recovery, an organization 
which fights for a safer environment. 
(6) Johnson and the People for Community Re-
covery fought to educate and empower the residents 
of Altgeld Gardens, including providing workshops 
and trainings, conducting health surveys, rallying 
residents to protest contamination, and working with 
youth in the community. 
(7) The People for Community Recovery put 
pressure on the Chicago Housing Authority to re-
move asbestos from Altgeld Gardens. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:13 Feb 21, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H673.IH
H673
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
(1) conduct a study on the effects of the imple-
mentation of the requirement described in subpara-
graph (D) of section 1860D–2(d)(1) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(d)(1)), as 
added by subsection (a), including an analysis of— 
(A) trends in the list and net prices of in-
sulin for qualified prescription drug coverage 
offered by a prescription drug plan under part 
D of the Social Security Act or an MA–PD 
plan under part C of such title; 
(B) savings on insulin for individuals en-
rolled in a prescription drug plan under part D 
of the Social Security Act or an MA–PD plan 
under part C of such title; 
(C) trends in out-of-pocket costs for indi-
viduals enrolled in such plans, as compared to 
individuals enrolled in a group health plan (as 
defined in section 2791(a) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–91(a)), a State 
plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act, 
or a qualified health plan offered through an 
Exchange established under title I of the Pa-
tient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18001 et seq.); and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
05:35 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6757.IH
H6757
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
V 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5062 
For the relief of Helene Jensen. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 
Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
For the relief of Helene Jensen. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HELENE 
JENSEN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, Helene Jensen shall be eligible for issuance of an im-
migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 
lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec-
tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 
permanent resident.
(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Helene Jensen en-
ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 
in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en-
actment of this Act. 
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF 
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Helene Jensen, the Secretary of State shall in-
struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 
or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi-
grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun-
try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 
number of immigrant visas that are made available to na-
tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 
202(e) of such Act. 
(e) 
DENIAL
OF
PREFERENTIAL
IMMIGRATION 
TREATMENT
FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
parents, brothers, and sisters of Helene Jensen shall not, 
by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi-
lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5064
To prohibit the giving or acceptance of payment for the placement of a 
child, or obtaining consent to adoption. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 13, 2004
Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To prohibit the giving or acceptance of payment for the 
placement of a child, or obtaining consent to adoption.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baby Selling Prohibi-
tion Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 77 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
HR 5064 IH 
‘‘§ 1596. Accepting or charging excess amounts in 
connection with the placement of a child 
or obtaining consent to adoption 
‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF MINOR.—In this section, the 
term ‘minor’ has the same meaning as in section 25(a)(2). 
‘‘(b) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, in connection with the 
adoption of a minor, knowingly accepts or charges any fee 
in excess of the allowable costs for adoption, as those costs 
are defined under the law of the State in which the adop-
tion is finalized, shall be imprisoned for not more than 
10 years. 
‘‘(c) ALLOWABLE COSTS.—If, under the law of any 
State in which an adoption is finalized, the allowable costs 
associated with the adoption of a minor are not defined, 
the allowable costs for purposes of this section shall be—
‘‘(1) maternity-related medical and costs; 
‘‘(2) travel, meal, and lodging costs accrued 
when necessary for court appearances; 
‘‘(3) counseling fees; 
‘‘(4) fees to cover pre- and post-adoption coun-
seling provided by a licensed health practitioner; 
‘‘(5) attorney and legal fees associated with the 
adoption; 
‘‘(6) foster care for the child to be adopted; and 
‘‘(7) foster care for the child to be adopted, and 
costs associated with medical care, routine care,
HR 5064 IH 
travel, and living expenses of the child to be adopt-
ed. 
‘‘(d) LIMITATION.—All costs described under sub-
section (b) or (c) shall be reasonable and customary within 
the State in which the adoption is finalized. 
‘‘(e) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to all 
individuals, intermediaries, or entities involved in the 
adoption of a minor.’’. 
(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—
The table of sections for chapter 77 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘1596. Accepting or charging excess amounts in connection with the placement 
of a child or obtaining consent to adoption.’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5065
To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to the 
Virgin Islands. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 13, 2004
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, 
pertaining to the Virgin Islands.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO 
THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 
(a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 
26, 1936, (Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372–1373; 48 U.S.C. 
1401–1401e) are repealed. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be deemed 
to have taken effect on July 22, 1954.
Æ
protection sites by publishing notice thereof in the Federal 
Register. 
(d) WITHDRAWAL OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.—Upon the 
written request of an owner of private property included 
within the boundary of an archaeological site protected 
under this Act, the Secretary shall immediately remove that 
private property from within that boundary. 
SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL SITES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall—
(1) continue to search for additional Native 
American and Spanish colonial sites in the Galisteo 
Basin area of New Mexico; and 
(2) submit to Congress, within three years after 
the date funds become available and thereafter as 
needed, recommendations for additions to, deletions 
from, and modifications of the boundaries of the list 
of archaeological protection sites in section 3 of this 
Act. 
(b) ADDITIONS ONLY BY STATUTE.—Additions to or 
deletions from the list in section 3 shall be made only by 
an Act of Congress. 
SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—
(1) The Secretary shall administer archaeological 
protection sites located on Federal land in accordance
HR 506 PCS 
SEC. 9. SAVINGS PROVISIONS. 
Nothing in this Act shall be construed—
(1) to authorize the regulation of privately 
owned lands within an area designated as an archae-
ological protection site; 
(2) to modify, enlarge, or diminish any author-
ity of Federal, State, or local governments to regu-
late any use of privately owned lands; 
(3) to modify, enlarge, or diminish any author-
ity of Federal, State, tribal, or local governments to 
manage or regulate any use of land as provided for 
by law or regulation; or 
(4) to restrict or limit a tribe from protecting 
cultural or religious sites on tribal lands.
Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 
2003. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
Calendar No. 368
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 506
AN ACT 
To provide for the protection of archaeological sites 
in the Galisteo Basin in New Mexico, and for 
other purposes. 
NOVEMBER 5, 2003
Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
(b) ADJUSTMENT
OF
STATUS.—If Ana Maria 
Moncayo-Gigax enters the United States before the filing 
deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered 
to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other-
wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF 
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Ana Maria Moncayo-Gigax, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur-
ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num-
ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 
of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 
the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail-
able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 
section 202(e) of such Act. 
(e) 
DENIAL
OF
PREFERENTIAL
IMMIGRATION 
TREATMENT
FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
parents, brothers, and sisters of Ana Maria Moncayo- 
Gigax shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act. 
Æ
HR 5072 IH 
CHAPTER 5 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 
CONSTRUCTION 
For an additional amount for ‘‘Construction’’, 
$13,900,000, to remain available until expended: Pro-
vided, That the amounts provided herein are designated 
as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of 
S. Con. Res. 95 (108th Congress), as made applicable to 
the House of Representatives by H. Res. 649 (108th Con-
gress) and applicable to the Senate by section 14007 of 
Public Law 108–287. 
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 
CONSTRUCTION 
For an additional amount for ‘‘Construction’’, 
$7,400,000, to remain available until expended: Provided, 
That the amounts provided herein are designated as an 
emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of S. Con. 
Res. 95 (108th Congress), as made applicable to the 
House of Representatives by H. Res. 649 (108th Con-
gress) and applicable to the Senate by section 14007 of 
Public Law 108–287.
tion of information and unnecessary requirements for 
originator approval. 
TITLE V—OTHER PROVISIONS 
SEC. 501. CITIZEN ACTIONS. 
Section 552(a)(4)(E) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘, or in any case seeking infor-
mation from a Federal agency or official under any 
other Federal law,’’ after ‘‘case under this section’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For 
purposes of this section, a complainant has ‘substan-
tially prevailed’ if the complainant has obtained 
some of its requested relief through a judicial or ad-
ministrative order or an enforceable written agree-
ment, or if the complainant’s pursuit of a nonfrivo-
lous claim or defense has been a catalyst for a vol-
untary or unilateral change in position by the oppos-
ing party that provides any significant part of the 
relief sought.’’. 
Æ
The 2002 model year city 
‘‘If vehicle inertia weight class is: 
fuel economy is: 
2,250 lbs ..................................................................................
31.8 mpg
2,500 lbs ..................................................................................
29.0 mpg
2,750 lbs ..................................................................................
26.8 mpg
3,000 lbs ..................................................................................
24.9 mpg
3,500 lbs ..................................................................................
21.8 mpg
4,000 lbs ..................................................................................
19.4 mpg
4,500 lbs ..................................................................................
17.6 mpg
5,000 lbs ..................................................................................
16.1 mpg
5,500 lbs ..................................................................................
14.8 mpg
6,000 lbs ..................................................................................
13.7 mpg
6,500 lbs ..................................................................................
12.8 mpg
7,000 to 8,500 lbs ....................................................................
12.1 mpg. 
‘‘(B) VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT CLASS.— 
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term 
‘vehicle inertia weight class’ has the same 
meaning as when defined in regulations pre-
scribed by the Administrator of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency for purposes of the 
administration of title II of the Clean Air Act 
(42 U.S.C. 7521 et seq.). 
‘‘(4) FUEL ECONOMY.—Fuel economy with re-
spect to any vehicle shall be measured under rules 
similar to the rules under section 4064(c). 
‘‘(5) REDUCTION IN BASIS.—For purposes of 
this subtitle, if a credit is allowed under this section 
for any expenditure with respect to any property, the 
increase in the basis of such property which would 
(but for this paragraph) result from such expendi-
ture shall be reduced by the amount of the credit so 
allowed.
HR 5072 IH 
gency measures due to the effects of hurricanes, 
$126,000,000, to remain available until expended: Pro-
vided, That the amounts provided herein are designated 
as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of 
S. Con. Res. 95 (108th Congress), as made applicable to 
the House of Representatives by H. Res. 649 (108th Con-
gress) and applicable to the Senate by section 14007 of 
Public Law 108–287. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Supple-
mental Appropriations for Hurricane Disaster Assistance 
Act, 2004’’. 
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5074
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 100 percent 
deduction for the health insurance costs of individuals. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 14, 2004
Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
a 100 percent deduction for the health insurance costs 
of individuals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance Af-
fordability Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED HEALTH INSURANCE 
COSTS OF INDIVIDUALS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap-
ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
additional itemized deductions) is amended by redesig-
nating section 224 as section 225 and by inserting after 
section 223 the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 224. COSTS OF QUALIFIED HEALTH INSURANCE. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual, 
there shall be allowed as a deduction an amount equal to 
the amount paid during the taxable year for coverage for 
the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents under qualified 
health insurance. 
‘‘(b) QUALIFIED HEALTH INSURANCE.—For pur-
poses of this section, the term ‘qualified health insurance’ 
means insurance which constitutes medical care; except 
that such term shall not include any insurance if substan-
tially all of its coverage is of excepted benefits described 
in section 9832(c). 
‘‘(c) SPECIAL RULES.—
‘‘(1) COORDINATION
WITH
MEDICAL
DEDUC-
TION, ETC.—Any amount paid by a taxpayer for in-
surance to which subsection (a) applies shall not be 
taken into account in computing the amount allow-
able to the taxpayer as a deduction under section 
162(l) or 213(a). 
‘‘(2) DEDUCTION NOT ALLOWED FOR SELF-EM-
PLOYMENT
TAX
PURPOSES.—The deduction allow-
able by reason of this section shall not be taken into 
account in determining an individual’s net earnings
from self-employment (within the meaning of section 
1402(a)) for purposes of chapter 2.’’. 
(b) DEDUCTION
ALLOWED
IN
COMPUTING
AD-
JUSTED GROSS INCOME.—Subsection (a) of section 62 of 
such Code is amended by inserting after paragraph (19) 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(20) COSTS
OF
QUALIFIED
HEALTH
INSUR-
ANCE.—The deduction allowed by section 224.’’. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
is amended by striking the last item and inserting the fol-
lowing new items:
‘‘Sec. 224. Costs of qualified health insurance. 
‘‘Sec. 225. Cross reference.’’
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2004.
Æ