767 
HR 1540 RFS
(2) The goals and factors shaping North Ko-
rean security strategy and military strategy. 
(3) Trends in North Korean security and mili-
tary behavior that would be designed to achieve, or 
that are inconsistent with, the goals described in 
paragraph (2). 
(4) An assessment of North Korea’s regional 
security objectives, including those that would affect 
South Korea, Japan, the People’s Republic of China, 
and Russia. 
(5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, loca-
tions, and capabilities of North Korean strategic, 
special operations, land, sea, and air forces. 
(6) Developments in North Korean military 
doctrine and training. 
(7) An assessment of the proliferation activities 
of North Korea, as either a supplier or a consumer 
of materials or technologies relating to nuclear 
weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or 
missile systems. 
(8) Other military and security developments 
involving North Korea that the Secretary of Defense 
considers relevant to United States national security. 
(c) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘specified 
congressional committees’’ means— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00767
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
768 
HR 1540 RFS
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1225. NATIONAL SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT OF 
UNITED STATES FEDERAL DEBT OWNED BY 
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 
(a) DETERMINATION OF INTEREST PAID TO SERVICE 
DEBT.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the en-
actment of this Act, the Director of the Congressional 
Budget Office shall determine and make publicly available 
the amount of accrued interest on United States Federal 
debt paid to the People’s Republic of China during the 
5-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
(b) ASSESSMENT AND REPORT.—Not later than 120 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of Na-
tional Intelligence, shall— 
(1) carry out an assessment of the national se-
curity risks posed to the United States and United 
States allies as a result of the United States Federal 
debt liabilities owed to China as a creditor of the 
United States Government and the amount of inter-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00768
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
769 
HR 1540 RFS
est determined to have been paid by the United 
States to China pursuant to subsection (a); and 
(2) submit to the specified congressional com-
mittees a report that contains the results of the as-
sessment carried out under paragraph (1). 
(c) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report re-
quired by subsection (b)(2) shall include the following: 
(1) A description of the United States Federal 
debt liabilities owed to China as a creditor of the 
United States Government. 
(2) A description of the amounts projected for 
defense spending by China in 2011. 
(3) A discussion of any options available to 
China for deterring United States military freedom 
of action in the Western Pacific as a result of its 
creditor status. 
(4) Other related issues the Secretary of De-
fense considers relevant. 
(d) FORM.—The report required by subsection (b)(2) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain 
a classified annex if necessary. 
(e) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘specified 
congressional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00769
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
770 
HR 1540 RFS
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1226. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT 
BEFORE PERMANENT RELOCATION OF ANY 
UNITED STATES MILITARY UNIT STATIONED 
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) NOTIFICATION AND RELATED REPORT.—Chapter 
6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after section 162 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 162a. Congressional notification before permanent 
relocation of military units stationed out-
side the United States 
‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION
AND
REPORTING
REQUIRE-
MENT.—If the Secretary of Defense plans to relocate a 
unit stationed outside the United States, the Secretary 
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, 
at the same time that the President’s budget is submitted 
pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States 
Code, for the fiscal year in which the relocation will occur, 
written notification of the relocation and the report re-
quired by subsection (b) related to that relocation. 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The notification re-
quired by subsection (a) shall include a report containing 
a description of the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00770
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
771 
HR 1540 RFS
‘‘(1) How relocation of the unit supports the 
United States national security strategy. 
‘‘(2) How relocation of the unit supports the se-
curity commitments undertaken by the United 
States pursuant to relevant international security 
treaties, including the North Atlantic Treaty, the 
Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between 
the United States and Japan, and the Security 
Treaty Between Australia, New Zealand, and the 
United States of America. 
‘‘(3) How relocation of the unit addresses the 
current security environment in the affected geo-
graphic combatant command’s area of responsibility, 
including United States participation in theater se-
curity cooperation activities and bilateral partner-
ship, exchanges, and training exercises. 
‘‘(4) Whether relocation of the unit will result 
in cost savings or increased costs to the Department 
of Defense as a result of— 
‘‘(A) the loss of the permanent presence of 
the unit at the overseas location; 
‘‘(B) the reliance on the rotation of units 
or other means to achieve the same security ob-
jectives; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00771
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
772 
HR 1540 RFS
‘‘(C) the costs of maintaining the unit at 
its new location. 
‘‘(5) How relocation of the unit impacts the sta-
tus of overseas base closure and realignment actions 
undertaken as part of a global defense posture re-
alignment strategy and the status of development 
and execution of comprehensive master plans for 
overseas military main operating bases, forward op-
erating sites, and cooperative security locations of 
the global defense posture of the United States. 
‘‘(c) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) does not apply in 
the case of— 
‘‘(1) the relocation of a unit deployed in sup-
port of a contingency operation; 
‘‘(2) the relocation of a unit as the result of clo-
sure of an overseas installation at the request of the 
government of the host nation in the manner pro-
vided in the agreement between the United States 
and the host nation regarding the installation; or 
‘‘(3) a reduction in the number of Brigade 
Combat Teams stationed in Europe from four to 
three. 
‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec-
tion shall be construed to limit the authority of the Sec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00772
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
773 
HR 1540 RFS
retary of Defense to relocate military units stationed out-
side the United States. 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE
COMMITTEES
OF
CON-
GRESS.—The term ‘appropriate committees of Con-
gress’ means— 
‘‘(A) the Committee on Armed Services 
and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
Senate; and 
‘‘(B) the Committee on Armed Services 
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 
House of Representatives. 
‘‘(2) GEOGRAPHIC
COMBATANT
COMMAND.— 
The term ‘geographic combatant command’ means a 
combatant command with a geographic area of re-
sponsibility that does not include North America. 
‘‘(3) UNIT.—The term ‘unit’ means a unit of 
the armed forces at the battalion, squadron, or an 
equivalent level (or a higher level).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 162 the following new 
item: 
‘‘162a. Congressional notification before permanent relocation of military units 
stationed outside the United States.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00773
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
774 
HR 1540 RFS
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1063 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2469; 10 U.S.C. 113 
note) is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (c); and 
(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (c). 
SEC. 1227. ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY POWER OF THE 
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 
(a) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Subsection (b) of 
section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 
10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 
1246(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2544), 
is further amended— 
(1) in paragraph (7)— 
(A) by adding at the end before the period 
the following: ‘‘or otherwise undermine the De-
partment of Defense’s capability to conduct in-
formation assurance’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘Such analyses shall include an assessment of 
the damage inflicted on the Department of De-
fense by reason thereof.’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00774
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
775 
HR 1540 RFS
(2) in paragraph (9), by adding at the end the 
following: ‘‘Such analyses shall include an assess-
ment of the nature of China’s cyber activities di-
rected against the Department of Defense and an 
assessment of the damage inflicted on the Depart-
ment of Defense by reason thereof. Such cyber ac-
tivities shall include activities originating or sus-
pected of originating from China and shall include 
government and non-government activities believed 
to be sanctioned or supported by the Government of 
China.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Such section is fur-
ther amended in the heading by striking ‘‘MILITARY AND 
SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘MILITARY POWER OF’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, and shall apply with respect to reports re-
quired to be submitted under subsection (a) of section 
1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2000, as so amended, on or after that date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00775
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
776 
HR 1540 RFS
SEC. 1228. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO PROVIDE THE RUS-
SIAN FEDERATION WITH ACCESS TO UNITED 
STATES MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) LIMITATION ON FUNDS FOR SENSITIVE TECH-
NOLOGY AND DATA.—No funds made available to carry 
out this Act may be used to provide the Russian Federa-
tion with access to— 
(1) sensitive missile defense technology of the 
United States, including hit-to-kill technology; or 
(2) sensitive data, including sensitive technical 
data, warning, detection, tracking, targeting, telem-
etry, command and control, and battle management 
data, that support the missile defense capabilities of 
the United States. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON FUNDS
FOR OTHER TECH-
NOLOGY AND DATA.—No funds made available to carry 
out this Act may be used to provide the Russian Federa-
tion with access to missile defense technology or technical 
data not described in subsection (a) as part of a defense 
technical cooperation agreement between the Russian Fed-
eration and the United States unless, not less than 30 
days prior to providing the Russian Federation with access 
to any such technology or technical data, the President 
submits to the appropriate congressional committees the 
report described in subsection (c) and the certification de-
scribed in subsection (d). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00776
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
777 
HR 1540 RFS
(c) REPORT.—The report referred to in subsection 
(b) is a report that contains a description of the following: 
(1) The specific missile defense technology or 
technical data to be accessed, the reasons for pro-
viding such access, and how the technology or tech-
nical data is intended to be used. 
(2) The measures necessary to protect the tech-
nology or technical data. 
(3) The specific missile defense technology or 
technical data of the Russian Federation that the 
Russian Federation is providing the United States 
with access to. 
(4) The status and substance of discussions be-
tween the United States and the Russian Federation 
on missile defense matters. 
(d) CERTIFICATION.—The certification referred to in 
subsection (b) is a certification of the President that pro-
viding the Russian Federation with access to the missile 
defense technology or technical data— 
(1) includes an agreement on prohibiting access 
to such defense technology or technical data by third 
parties; 
(2) will not enable the Russian Federation or 
any third party that may obtain access to such de-
fense technology or technical data by means inten-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00777
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
778 
HR 1540 RFS
tional or otherwise to develop counter-measures to 
any United States missile defense system or other-
wise undermine the effectiveness of any United 
States missile defense system; and 
(3) will correspond to equitable access by the 
United States to missile defense technology or tech-
nical data of the Russian Federation. 
(e) FORM.—The report described in subsection (c) 
and the certification described in subsection (d) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classi-
fied annex, if necessary. 
(f) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1229. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS RELATING TO 
MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Prior to signing the New START Treaty, 
on April 7, 2010, the Russian Federation made the 
unilateral statement that ‘‘the Treaty can operate 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00778
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
779 
HR 1540 RFS
and be viable only if the United States of America 
refrains from developing its missile defense capabili-
ties quantitatively or qualitatively.’’. 
(2) In the understanding under subsection 
(b)(1)(A) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to 
Ratification of the New START Treaty, the Senate 
declared that ‘‘the New START Treaty does not im-
pose any limitations on the deployment of missile de-
fenses other than the requirements of paragraph 3 
of Article V of the New START Treaty. . .’’. 
(3) In the understanding under subsection 
(b)(1)(B) of such resolution, the Senate further de-
clared that ‘‘any additional New START Treaty lim-
itations on the deployment of missile defenses be-
yond those contained in paragraph 3 of Article V, 
including any limitations agreed under the auspices 
of the Bilateral Consultative Commission, would re-
quire an amendment to the New START Treaty 
which may enter into force for the United States 
only with the advice and consent of the Senate, as 
set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Con-
stitution of the United States.’’. 
(4) In the understanding under subsection 
(b)(1)(C) of such resolution, the Senate further de-
clared that ‘‘the April 7, 2010, unilateral statement 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00779
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
780 
HR 1540 RFS
by the Russian Federation on missile defense does 
not impose a legal obligation on the United States.’’. 
(5) 
In 
the 
declaration 
under 
subsection 
(c)(2)(F) of such resolution, the Senate further de-
clared that ‘‘the United States is committed to im-
proving United States strategic defensive capabilities 
both quantitatively and qualitatively during the pe-
riod that the New START Treaty is in effect, and 
such improvements are consistent with the Treaty.’’. 
(b) POLICY.—In light of the findings under sub-
section (a), it is the policy of the United States— 
(1) that any further limitations on the missile 
defense capabilities of the United States are not in 
the national security interests of the United States; 
(2) to improve the strategic defensive capabili-
ties of the United States both quantitatively and 
qualitatively during the period that the New START 
treaty is in effect and such improvements are con-
sistent with the Treaty; and 
(3) that no future agreement with Russia on 
cooperative missile defense, non-strategic nuclear 
weapons, further strategic weapons reductions, or 
any other matter shall include any restrictions on 
the missile defense options of the United States in 
Europe or elsewhere. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00780
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
781 
HR 1540 RFS
(c) LIMITATIONS ON MISSILE DEFENSE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by adding after section 
130f, as added by section 1091, the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 130g. International agreements relating to missile 
defense 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the under-
standing under subsection (b)(1)(B) of the Resolution of 
Advice and Consent to Ratification of the New START 
Treaty of the Senate, any agreement with a country or 
international organization or amendment to the New 
START Treaty (including an agreement made by the Bi-
lateral Consultative Commission established by the New 
START Treaty) concerning the limitation of the missile 
defense capabilities of the United States shall not be bind-
ing on the United States, and shall not enter into force 
with respect to the United States, unless after the date 
of the enactment of this section, such agreement or 
amendment is— 
‘‘(1) specifically approved with the advice and 
consent of the Senate pursuant to Article II, section 
2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or 
‘‘(2) specifically authorized by an Act of Con-
gress. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00781
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
782 
HR 1540 RFS
‘‘(b) ANNUAL NOTIFICATION.—Not later than Janu-
ary 31 of each year, beginning in 2012, the President shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representa-
tives a notification of— 
‘‘(1) whether the Russian Federation has recog-
nized during the previous year the sovereign right of 
the United States to pursue quantitative and quali-
tative improvements in missile defense capabilities; 
and 
‘‘(2) whether during any treaty negotiations or 
other Government-to-Government contacts between 
the United States and the Russian Federation (in-
cluding under the auspices of the Bilateral Consult-
ative Commission established by the New START 
Treaty) during the previous year a representative of 
the Russian Federation suggested that a treaty or 
other international agreement include, with respect 
to the United States— 
‘‘(A) restricting missile defense capabili-
ties, military capabilities in space, or conven-
tional prompt global strike capabilities; or 
‘‘(B) reducing the number of non-strategic 
nuclear weapons deployed in Europe. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00782
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
783 
HR 1540 RFS
‘‘(c) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘New START Treaty’ means the Treaty be-
tween the United States of America and the Russian Fed-
eration on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limi-
tation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 
2010.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of such chapter is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 130d 
the following new item: 
‘‘130g. International agreements relating to missile defense.’’. 
(d) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty 
between the United States of America and the Russian 
Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and 
Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 
8, 2010. 
SEC. 1230. NON-STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAPON REDUC-
TIONS AND EXTENDED DETERRENCE POLICY. 
(a) POLICY ON NON-STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAP-
ONS.—It is the policy of the United States— 
(1) to pursue negotiations with the Russian 
Federation aimed at the reduction of Russian de-
ployed and non-deployed non-strategic nuclear 
forces; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00783
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
784 
HR 1540 RFS
(2) that non-strategic nuclear weapons should 
be considered when weighing the balance of the nu-
clear forces of the United States and Russia; and 
(3) that any geographical relocation or storage 
of non-strategic nuclear weapons by Russia does not 
constitute a reduction or elimination of such weap-
ons. 
(b) POLICY ON EXTENDED DETERRENCE COMMIT-
MENT TO EUROPE.—It is the policy of the United States 
that— 
(1) it maintain its commitment to extended de-
terrence, specifically the nuclear alliance of the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, as an impor-
tant component of ensuring and linking the national 
security interests of the United States and the secu-
rity of its European allies; 
(2) forward-deployed nuclear forces of the 
United States shall remain based in Europe in sup-
port of the NATO nuclear alliance; and 
(3) the presence of nuclear weapons of the 
United States in Europe—combined with NATO’s 
unique nuclear sharing arrangements under which 
non-nuclear members participate in nuclear planning 
and possess specially configured aircraft capable of 
delivering nuclear weapons—contributes to the cohe-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00784
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
785 
HR 1540 RFS
sion of NATO and provides reassurance to allies and 
partners who feel exposed to regional threats. 
(c) LIMITATION ON REDUCTION, CONSOLIDATION, OR 
WITHDRAWAL
OF NUCLEAR FORCES BASED
IN EU-
ROPE.—In light of the policy expressed in subsections (a) 
and (b), no action may be taken to effect or implement 
the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal of nuclear 
forces of the United States that are based in Europe un-
less— 
(1) the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal 
of such nuclear forces is requested by the govern-
ment of the host nation in the manner provided in 
the agreement between the United States and the 
host nation regarding the forces; 
(2) the President certifies that— 
(A) NATO member states have considered 
the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal in 
the High Level Group; 
(B) NATO has decided to support such re-
duction, consolidation, or withdrawal; and 
(C) the remaining nuclear forces of the 
United States that are based in Europe after 
such reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal 
would provide a commensurate or better level of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00785
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
786 
HR 1540 RFS
assurance and credibility as before such reduc-
tion, consolidation, or withdrawal; or 
(3) the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal 
of such nuclear forces is— 
(A) pursuant to a treaty or international 
agreement specifically approved with the advice 
and consent of the Senate pursuant to Article 
II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or 
(B) specifically authorized by an Act of 
Congress. 
(d) NOTIFICATION.—Upon any decision to reduce, 
consolidate, or withdraw the nuclear forces of the United 
States that are based in Europe, the President shall sub-
mit to the appropriate congressional committees a notifi-
cation containing— 
(1) the certification required by subsection 
(c)(2); 
(2) justification for such reduction, consolida-
tion, or withdrawal; and 
(3) an assessment of how NATO member 
states, in light of such reduction, consolidation, or 
withdrawal, assess the credibility of the deterrence 
capability of the United States in support of its com-
mitments undertaken pursuant to article 5 of the 
North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington, Dis-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00786
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
787 
HR 1540 RFS
trict of Columbia, on April 4, 1949, and entered into 
force on August 24, 1949 (63 Stat. 2241; TIAS 
1964). 
(e) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.—The Presi-
dent may not commence a reduction, consolidation, or 
withdrawal of the nuclear forces of the United States that 
are based in Europe for which the certification required 
by subsection (c)(2) is made until the expiration of a 180- 
day period beginning on the date on which the President 
submits the report under subsection (d) containing the 
certification. 
(f) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.— 
In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional com-
mittees’’ means— 
(1) the Committees on Armed Services of the 
House of Representatives and the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate. 
SEC. 1231. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION RELATING TO SITUA-
TION IN LIBYA. 
Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this 
Act shall be construed to authorize military operations in 
Libya. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00787
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
788 
HR 1540 RFS
SEC. 1232. REPORT ON EXPANSION OF PARTICIPATION IN 
EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of the Air Force, in consultation with the Secretary of 
State, shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Sen-
ate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 
of Representatives a report on the desirability and feasi-
bility of expanding participation in the Euro-NATO Joint 
Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) program to include addi-
tional countries. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report re-
quired under subsection (a) shall include the following: 
(1) A description of the benefits of the 
ENJJPT program to United States national secu-
rity. 
(2) An assessment of the current participation 
in the ENJJPT program and whether it fully meets 
the needs of the program and United States and 
NATO objectives. 
(3) An analysis of whether participation of ad-
ditional countries in the ENJJPT program would 
benefit the program and United States national se-
curity. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00788
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
789 
HR 1540 RFS
(4) A recommendation of additional countries 
that could participate in the ENJJPT program, in-
cluding NATO member nations not currently partici-
pating in the program, major non-NATO allies, 
Partnership for Peace nations, and other countries. 
(5) The restrictions or limitations that cur-
rently prevent additional countries from partici-
pating in the ENJJPT program. 
(6) A discussion of the benefits to the United 
States and other countries of a United States-spon-
sored scholarship program to assist certain countries 
to meet the cost-sharing obligations of participation 
in the ENJJPT program, and whether authorities 
currently exist to institute such a scholarship pro-
gram. 
SEC. 1233. REPORT ON LONG-TERM COSTS OF OPERATION 
IRAQI 
FREEDOM, 
OPERATION 
ENDURING 
FREEDOM, AND OPERATION ODYSSEY DAWN. 
(a) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, 
with contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Sec-
retary of State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 
shall submit to Congress a report containing an estimate 
of the long-term costs of Operation New Dawn and Oper-
ation Enduring Freedom for each the following scenarios: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00789
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
790 
HR 1540 RFS
(1) The scenario in which the number of mem-
bers of the Armed Forces deployed in support of Op-
eration New Dawn and Operation Enduring Free-
dom is reduced from roughly 190,000 in 2011 to 
150,000 in 2012, 65,000 in 2013, and 30,000 by 
the beginning of 2014, and remains at 30,000 
through 2020. 
(2) The scenario in which the number of mem-
bers of the Armed Forces deployed in support of Op-
eration New Dawn and Operation Enduring Free-
dom rises to approximately 235,000 in 2011, is re-
duced to 230,000 in 2012, 195,000 in 2013, 
135,000 in 2014, 80,000 in 2015, 60,000 in 2016, 
and remains at 60,000 through 2020. 
(3) An alternative scenario, determined by the 
President and based on current contingency oper-
ation and withdrawal plans, which takes into ac-
count expected force levels and the expected length 
of time that members of the Armed Forces will be 
deployed in support of Operation New Dawn and 
Operation Enduring Freedom. 
(b) ESTIMATES TO BE USED IN PREPARATION OF 
REPORT.— In preparing the report required by subsection 
(b), the President shall make estimates and projections 
through at least fiscal year 2020, adjust any dollar 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00790
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
791 
HR 1540 RFS
amounts appropriately for inflation, and take into account 
and specify each of the following: 
(1) The total number of members of the Armed 
Forces expected to be deployed in support of Oper-
ation New Dawn, Operation Enduring Freedom, and 
Operation Odyssey Dawn, including— 
(A) the number of members of the Armed 
Forces actually deployed in Southwest Asia in 
support of Operation New Dawn, Operation 
Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey 
Dawn; 
(B) the number of members of reserve 
components of the Armed Forces called or or-
dered to active duty in the United States for 
the purpose of training for eventual deployment 
in Southwest Asia, backfilling for deployed 
troops, or supporting other Department of De-
fense missions directly or indirectly related to 
Operation New Dawn, Operation Enduring 
Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn; and 
(C) the break-down of deployments of 
members of the regular and reserve components 
and activation of members of the reserve com-
ponents. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00791
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
792 
HR 1540 RFS
(2) The number of members of the Armed 
Forces, including members of the reserve compo-
nents, who have previously served in support of Op-
eration Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, Oper-
ation Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey 
Dawn and who are expected to serve multiple de-
ployments. 
(3) The number of contractors and private mili-
tary security firms that have been used and are ex-
pected to be used during the course of Operation 
Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, Operation 
Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn. 
(4) The number of veterans currently suffering 
and expected to suffer from post-traumatic stress 
disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental in-
juries. 
(5) The number of veterans currently in need of 
and expected to be in need of prosthetic care and 
treatment because of amputations incurred during 
service in support of Operation New Dawn, Oper-
ation Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey 
Dawn. 
(6) The current number of pending Department 
of Veterans Affairs claims from veterans of military 
service in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, and the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00792
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
793 
HR 1540 RFS
total number of such veterans expected to seek dis-
ability compensation from the Department of Vet-
erans Affairs. 
(7) The total number of members of the Armed 
Forces who have been killed or wounded in Iraq, Af-
ghanistan, or Libya, including noncombat casualties, 
the total number of members expected to suffer inju-
ries in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, and the total 
number of members expected to be killed in Iraq, 
Afghanistan, and Libya, including noncombat cas-
ualties. 
(8) The amount of funds previously appro-
priated for the Department of Defense, the Depart-
ment of State, and the Department of Veterans Af-
fairs for costs related to Operation Iraqi Freedom, 
Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring 
Freedom, including an account of the amount of 
funding from regular Department of Defense, De-
partment of State, and Department of Veterans Af-
fairs budgets that has gone and will go to costs asso-
ciated with such operations. 
(9) Current and future operational expenditures 
associated with Operation New Dawn, Operation 
Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn 
including— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00793
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
794 
HR 1540 RFS
(A) funding for combat operations; 
(B) deploying, transporting, feeding, and 
housing members of the Armed Forces (includ-
ing fuel costs); 
(C) activation and deployment of members 
of the reserve components of the Armed Forces; 
(D) equipping and training of Iraqi and 
Afghani forces; 
(E) purchasing, upgrading, and repairing 
weapons, munitions, and other equipment con-
sumed or used in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Op-
eration New Dawn, Operation Enduring Free-
dom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn; and 
(F) payments to other countries for 
logistical assistance in support of such oper-
ations. 
(10) Past, current, and future costs of entering 
into contracts with private military security firms 
and other contractors for the provision of goods and 
services associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, 
Operation New Dawn, Operation Enduring Free-
dom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn. 
(11) Average annual cost for each member of 
the Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation 
Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, Operation 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00794
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
795 
HR 1540 RFS
Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn, 
including room and board, equipment and body 
armor, transportation of troops and equipment (in-
cluding fuel costs), and operational costs. 
(12) Current and future cost of combat-related 
special pays and benefits, including reenlistment bo-
nuses. 
(13) Current and future cost of calling or or-
dering members of the reserve components to active 
duty in support of Operation New Dawn, Operation 
Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn. 
(14) Current and future cost for reconstruction, 
embassy operations and construction, and foreign 
aid programs for Iraq and Afghanistan. 
(15) Current and future cost of bases and other 
infrastructure to support members of the Armed 
Forces serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
(16) Current and future cost of providing 
health care for veterans who served in support of 
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, 
Operation Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odys-
sey Dawn— 
(A) the cost of mental health treatment for 
veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00795
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
799 
HR 1540 RFS
Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3461; 10 
U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) WAIVER AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of De-
fense may waive the limitation on procurement of a good 
or service under subsection (a) if the good or service is 
critical to the needs of the Department of Defense and 
is otherwise unavailable to the Department of Defense and 
the Secretary submits to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report described in subsection (d) not less than 
15 days before issuing the waiver under this subsection.’’. 
(b) REPORT.—Such section is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(d) REPORT.—The report referred to in subsection 
(c) is a report that identifies the specific reasons for the 
waiver issued under subsection (c) and includes rec-
ommendations as to what actions may be taken to develop 
alternative sourcing capabilities in the future.’’. 
(c) DEFINITION OF COMMUNIST CHINESE MILITARY 
COMPANY.—Subsection (e) of such section, as redesig-
nated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended by 
striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00799
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
800 
HR 1540 RFS
‘‘(1) The term ‘Communist Chinese military 
company’ means— 
‘‘(A) any person identified in the Defense 
Intelligence Agency publication numbered VP- 
1920-271-90, dated September 1990, or PC- 
1921-57-95, dated October 1995, and any up-
date of those publications for the purposes of 
this section; and 
‘‘(B) any other person that— 
‘‘(i) is owned or controlled by, di-
rected by or from, operating with delegated 
authority from, or affiliated with, the Peo-
ple’s Liberation Army or the government 
of the People’s Republic of China or that 
is owned or controlled by an entity affili-
ated with the defense industrial base of the 
People’s Republic of China; and 
‘‘(ii) is engaged in providing commer-
cial services, manufacturing, producing, or 
exporting.’’. 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section take effect on the date of the enactment of 
this Act and apply with respect to contracts and sub-
contracts of the Department of Defense entered into on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00800
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
801 
HR 1540 RFS
SEC. 1235. REPORT ON RUSSIAN NUCLEAR FORCES. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the 
Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of 
National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate con-
gressional committees a report on the nuclear forces of 
the Russian Federation and the New START Treaty (as 
defined in section 1229(d)). 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under section 
(a) shall include an assessment of the following: 
(1) The assessed number of nuclear forces by 
category of nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles 
relative to New START levels by 2017 and by 2022, 
including potential shifts of such numbers during 
such periods. 
(2) Options with respect to the size and com-
position of Russian nuclear forces that Russia is 
considering, including decreases below the New 
START levels and plans for maintaining New 
START levels, including options related to devel-
oping and deploying a new heavy intercontinental 
ballistic missile and multiple independently target-
able reentry vehicle capability. 
(3) Factors that are likely to influence the 
number and composition of Russian nuclear forces. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00801
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
802 
HR 1540 RFS
(4) Effects of shifts in the number and com-
position of Russian nuclear forces on strategic sta-
bility. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 
classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMITTEES 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate con-
gressional committees’’ means— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 
(3) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives and the Se-
lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 1236. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES GROUND COM-
BAT PRESENCE IN LIBYA. 
No funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization 
of appropriations in this Act may be obligated or expended 
for the purpose of— 
(1) deploying members of the United States 
Armed Forces on to the ground of Libya for the 
purposes of engaging in ground combat operations, 
unless the purpose of such deployment is limited 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00802
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
803 
HR 1540 RFS
solely to rescuing members of the United States 
Armed Forces from imminent danger; 
(2) awarding a contract to a private security 
contractor to conduct any activity on the ground of 
Libya; or 
(3) otherwise establishing or maintaining any 
presence of members of the United States Armed 
Forces or private security contractors on the ground 
of Libya, unless the purpose of such presence is lim-
ited solely to rescuing members of the United States 
Armed Forces from imminent danger. 
SEC. 1237. REPEAL OF UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF 
PEACE ACT. 
Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the United States Institute of Peace Act (title XVII of 
Public Law 98–525; 22 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) is repealed. 
TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE 
THREAT REDUCTION 
SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION PROGRAMS AND FUNDS. 
(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION PROGRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and 
other provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction 
programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00803
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
932 
HR 1540 RFS
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2104 and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities 
with respect to the construction or improvement of family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,897,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2104 and avail-
able for military family housing functions as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 
Army may improve existing military family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for mili-
tary construction, land acquisition, and military family 
housing functions of the Department of the Army, as spec-
ified in the funding table in section 4601. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00932
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
933 
HR 1540 RFS
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for 
construction of a Multipurpose Training Range at the in-
stallation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up 
to 1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the 
Army’s construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training 
Ranges. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Schofield 
Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 
452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 451 
in lieu of building 452. 
(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (di-
vision B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort 
Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Mainte-
nance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:36 Jun 06, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00933
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1540.RFS
H1540
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS