159
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the locally preferred plan for flood 
damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, substantially 
in accordance with the detailed project report dated 2002, 
at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$4,000,000. 
(b) PROJECT FINANCING.—In evaluating and imple-
menting the project under this section, the Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interests to participate in the fi-
nancing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report 
evaluation indicates that applying such section is nec-
essary to implement the project. 
(c) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the project the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before date of execution of a partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project. 
(d) MAXIMUM FUNDING.—The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the flood damage 
reduction shall be $8,000,000.
160
SEC. 3080. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Har-
bors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to develop a final design and prepare 
plans and specifications to correct the harbor entrance and 
mooring conditions at the project. 
SEC. 3081. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA. 
The project for flood control, Red Lake River, 
Crookston, Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
278), is modified to include flood protection for the adja-
cent and interconnected areas generally known as the 
Sampson and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance 
with the Feasibility Report Supplement, Local Flood Pro-
tection, Crookston, Minnesota, at a total cost of 
$17,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$11,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$6,000,000. 
SEC. 3082. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act 
of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to include 
operation and maintenance of the general navigation fa-
cilities as a Federal responsibility.
161
SEC. 3083. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Min-
nesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to in-
clude operation and maintenance of the general navigation 
facilities as a Federal responsibility. 
SEC. 3084. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Two 
Harbors, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include construction of a dredged material 
disposal facility, including actions required to clear the 
site. 
(b) LANDS, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—
Non-Federal interests shall be responsible for providing all 
lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary 
for the construction of the dredged material disposal facil-
ity. 
(c) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $5,000,000. 
SEC. 3085. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, 
Harrison County, Mississippi, being carried out under sec-
tion 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to authorize the non-Fed-
162
eral interest to provide any portion of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind serv-
ices and materials. 
SEC. 3086. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall complete a 
feasibility study for the project for flood damage reduc-
tion, Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi. 
(b) COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES.—The feasibility 
study shall identify both the plan that maximizes national 
economic development benefits and the locally preferred 
plan and shall compare the level of flood damage reduction 
provided by each plan to that portion of Jackson, Mis-
sissippi, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam. 
(c) RECOMMENDED PLAN.—If the Secretary deter-
mines that the locally preferred plan provides a level of 
flood damage reduction that is equal to or greater than 
the level of flood damage reduction provided by the na-
tional economic development plan, and the locally pre-
ferred plan is technically feasible and environmentally pro-
tective, the Secretary shall recommend construction of the 
locally preferred plan. 
(d) EVALUATION OF PROJECT COST.—For the pur-
poses of determining compliance with the first section of 
the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a), 
the Secretary shall consider only the costs of the national
163
economic development plan, and shall exclude incremental 
costs associated with the locally preferred plan that are 
in excess of such costs, if the non-Federal interest agrees 
to pay 100 percent of such incremental costs. 
(e) NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.—If the locally pre-
ferred plan is authorized for construction, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project shall be the same percent-
age as the non-Federal share of the cost of the national 
economic development plan plus all additional costs of con-
struction associated with the locally preferred plan. 
SEC. 3087. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI. 
Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3088. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-
Chesterfield, Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
the cost of the planning, design, and construction work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.