179 
‘‘SEC. 2799. INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL APPEALS PROCE-
DURES. 
‘‘(a) RIGHT TO EXTERNAL APPEAL.—A health insur-
ance issuer may not offer, sell, or issue individual health 
insurance coverage in a secondary State under the provi-
sions of this title unless— 
‘‘(1) both the secondary State and the primary 
State have legislation or regulations in place estab-
lishing an independent review process for individuals 
who are covered by individual health insurance cov-
erage; or 
‘‘(2) in any case in which the requirements of 
paragraph (1) are not met with respect to the either 
of such States, the issuer provides an independent 
review mechanism substantially identical (as deter-
mined by the applicable State authority of such 
State) to that prescribed in the ‘Health Carrier Ex-
ternal Review Model Act’ of the National Association 
of Insurance Commissioners for all individuals who 
purchase insurance coverage under the terms of this 
part, except that, under such mechanism, the review 
is conducted by an independent medical reviewer, or 
a panel of such reviewers, with respect to whom the 
requirements of subsection (b) are met. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
180 
‘‘(b) QUALIFICATIONS OF INDEPENDENT MEDICAL 
REVIEWERS.—In the case of any independent review 
mechanism referred to in subsection (a)(2)— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In referring a denial of a 
claim to an independent medical reviewer, or to any 
panel of such reviewers, to conduct independent 
medical review, the issuer shall ensure that— 
‘‘(A) each independent medical reviewer 
meets the qualifications described in paragraphs 
(2) and (3); 
‘‘(B) with respect to each review, each re-
viewer meets the requirements of paragraph (4) 
and the reviewer, or at least 1 reviewer on the 
panel, meets the requirements described in 
paragraph (5); and 
‘‘(C) compensation provided by the issuer 
to each reviewer is consistent with paragraph 
(6). 
‘‘(2) LICENSURE AND EXPERTISE.—Each inde-
pendent medical reviewer shall be a physician 
(allopathic or osteopathic) or health care profes-
sional who— 
‘‘(A) is appropriately credentialed or li-
censed in one or more States to deliver health 
care services; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
181 
‘‘(B) typically treats the condition, makes 
the diagnosis, or provides the type of treatment 
under review. 
‘‘(3) INDEPENDENCE.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Subject to subpara-
graph (B), each independent medical reviewer 
in a case shall— 
‘‘(i) not be a related party (as defined 
in paragraph (7)); 
‘‘(ii) not have a material familial, fi-
nancial, or professional relationship with 
such a party; and 
‘‘(iii) not otherwise have a conflict of 
interest with such a party (as determined 
under regulations). 
‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Nothing in subpara-
graph (A) shall be construed to— 
‘‘(i) prohibit an individual, solely on 
the basis of affiliation with the issuer, 
from serving as an independent medical re-
viewer if— 
‘‘(I) a non-affiliated individual is 
not reasonably available; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
182 
‘‘(II) the affiliated individual is 
not involved in the provision of items 
or services in the case under review; 
‘‘(III) the fact of such an affili-
ation is disclosed to the issuer and the 
enrollee (or authorized representative) 
and neither party objects; and 
‘‘(IV) the affiliated individual is 
not an employee of the issuer and 
does not provide services exclusively or 
primarily to or on behalf of the issuer; 
‘‘(ii) prohibit an individual who has 
staff privileges at the institution where the 
treatment involved takes place from serv-
ing as an independent medical reviewer 
merely on the basis of such affiliation if 
the affiliation is disclosed to the issuer and 
the enrollee (or authorized representative), 
and neither party objects; or 
‘‘(iii) prohibit receipt of compensation 
by an independent medical reviewer from 
an entity if the compensation is provided 
consistent with paragraph (6). 
‘‘(4) PRACTICING HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL 
IN SAME FIELD.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
183 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—In a case involving 
treatment, or the provision of items or serv-
ices— 
‘‘(i) by a physician, a reviewer shall be 
a practicing physician (allopathic or osteo-
pathic) of the same or similar specialty, as 
a physician who, acting within the appro-
priate scope of practice within the State in 
which the service is provided or rendered, 
typically treats the condition, makes the 
diagnosis, or provides the type of treat-
ment under review; or 
‘‘(ii) by a non-physician health care 
professional, the reviewer, or at least 1 
member of the review panel, shall be a 
practicing non-physician health care pro-
fessional of the same or similar specialty 
as the non-physician health care profes-
sional who, acting within the appropriate 
scope of practice within the State in which 
the service is provided or rendered, typi-
cally treats the condition, makes the diag-
nosis, or provides the type of treatment 
under review. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
184 
‘‘(B) PRACTICING
DEFINED.—For pur-
poses of this paragraph, the term ‘practicing’ 
means, with respect to an individual who is a 
physician or other health care professional, that 
the individual provides health care services to 
individual patients on average at least 2 days 
per week. 
‘‘(5) PEDIATRIC EXPERTISE.—In the case of an 
external review relating to a child, a reviewer shall 
have expertise under paragraph (2) in pediatrics. 
‘‘(6) LIMITATIONS
ON
REVIEWER
COMPENSA-
TION.—Compensation provided by the issuer to an 
independent medical reviewer in connection with a 
review under this section shall— 
‘‘(A) not exceed a reasonable level; and 
‘‘(B) not be contingent on the decision ren-
dered by the reviewer. 
‘‘(7) RELATED PARTY DEFINED.—For purposes 
of this section, the term ‘related party’ means, with 
respect to a denial of a claim under a coverage relat-
ing to an enrollee, any of the following: 
‘‘(A) The issuer involved, or any fiduciary, 
officer, director, or employee of the issuer. 
‘‘(B) The enrollee (or authorized represent-
ative). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:33 May 20, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2300.IH
H2300
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS