Sec. 4129. Ferry Creek Reservoir, Brookings, Oregon. 
Sec. 4130. Oregon Navigation Jetties and Breakwaters, Oregon. 
Sec. 4131. Port Orford, Oregon. 
Sec. 4132. Buhl Lake, Sharon, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4133. Delaware River and tributaries, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4134. Elk Creek, Meadville, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4135. Mill Creek, Erie, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4136. Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4137. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction. 
Sec. 4138. Guayama, Puerto Rico. 
Sec. 4139. Rincon, Puerto Rico. 
Sec. 4140. Providence, Rhode Island. 
Sec. 4141. South Carolina. 
Sec. 4142. James River, South Dakota. 
Sec. 4143. Station Camp Creek, Gallatin, Tennessee. 
Sec. 4144. Brazos River, Texas. 
Sec. 4145. Hickory Creek, City of Balch Springs, Texas. 
Sec. 4146. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels (Barbours Cut), Texas. 
Sec. 4147. Port of Galveston, Texas. 
Sec. 4148. Simsboro Aquifer, City of Bastrop, Texas. 
Sec. 4149. Navasota River watershed, Grimes County, Texas. 
Sec. 4150. Rio Grande basin, Texas. 
Sec. 4151. Roma, Texas. 
Sec. 4152. Cottonwood Heights, Utah. 
Sec. 4153. Emery Town, Utah. 
Sec. 4154. Big Sandy River reallocation study, Virginia and West Virginia. 
Sec. 4155. Buckroe and Grandview Beaches, Hampton, Virginia. 
Sec. 4156. Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia. 
Sec. 4157. Hampton, Virginia. 
Sec. 4158. James River watershed, Virginia. 
Sec. 4159. Elliott Bay, Seattle, Washington. 
Sec. 4160. Green River, Kent, Washington. 
Sec. 4161. Vancouver Lake watershed, Vancouver, Washington. 
Sec. 4162. Lake Michigan shoreline, City of Cudahy, Wisconsin. 
TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS 
Sec. 5001. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection program. 
Sec. 5002. Saint Lawrence Seaway. 
Sec. 5003. Watershed management. 
Sec. 5004. Comprehensive shoreline restoration. 
Sec. 5005. Northeast Coastal Region ecosystem restoration. 
Sec. 5006. Anacostia watershed, District of Columbia and Maryland. 
Sec. 5007. Egmont Key, Florida. 
Sec. 5008. Cambridge, Maryland. 
Sec. 5009. Hart-Miller Island, Maryland. 
Sec. 5010. Gallops Island, Boston, Massachusetts. 
Sec. 5011. Sharkey County, Mississippi. 
Sec. 5012. Charleston Harbor Post 45 Project, Charleston, South Carolina. 
Sec. 5013. Sense of Congress on the promotion of General Michael J. Walsh to 
Major General, United States Army. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6213
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. 
In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 
of the Army. 
TITLE I—WATER RESOURCES 
PROJECTS 
SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the fol-
lowing projects for water resources development and con-
servation and other purposes are authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respec-
tive reports designated in this section: 
(1) MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND ECOSYSTEM 
RESTORATION
PROJECT, 
CHESAPEAKE
BAY, 
DOR-
CHESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND.—The project for eco-
system restoration, Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island Eco-
system Restoration Project, Chesapeake Bay, Dor-
chester County, Maryland: Report of the Chief of En-
gineers dated August 24, 2009, at a total cost of 
$1,612,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$1,045,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$567,000,000. 
(2) MISSISSIPPI COASTAL IMPROVEMENTS PRO-
GRAM, HANCOCK, HARRISON, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, 
MISSISSIPPI.—The project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, Mississippi Coastal Improvements 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Program, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
Mississippi: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
September 15, 2009, at a total cost of $1,182,600,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $746,750,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $435,850,000. 
(3) WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET 
(TOPSAIL
BEACH), PENDER
COUNTY, NORTH
CARO-
LINA.—The project for hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, West Onslow Beach and New River Inlet 
(Topsail Beach), Pender County, North Carolina: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 
2009, at a total cost of $32,131,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $20,708,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $11,423,000, and at an estimated 
total cost of $113,904,000 for periodic beach nourish-
ment over the 50-year life of the project, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $56,952,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $56,952,000. 
SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUC-
TION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(1) DEL ROSA CHANNEL, SAN BERNADINO, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Del 
Rosa Channel, San Bernadino, California. 
(2) LAGUNA CREEK, VACAVILLE, CALIFORNIA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Laguna Creek, 
Vacaville, California. 
(3) ULATIS CREEK, VACAVILLE, CALIFORNIA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Ulatis Creek, 
Vacaville, California. 
(4) SANDERSON GULCH, DENVER, COLORADO.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Sanderson Gulch, 
Denver, Colorado. 
(5) WILLOW
CREEK, 
CREEDE, 
COLORADO.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Willow Creek, 
Creede, Colorado. 
(6) BIG
ECON
RIVER, 
ORANGE, 
FLORIDA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Big Econ River, 
Orange, Florida. 
(7) BAY GALL CREEK, WARNER ROBBINS, GEOR-
GIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Bay Gall 
Creek, Warner Robbins, Georgia. 
(8) DES
PLAINES
RIVER, PARK
RIDGE, ILLI-
NOIS.—Project for flood damage reduction, Des 
Plaines River, Park Ridge, Illinois. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(9) KISHWAUKEE RIVER, DEKALB, ILLINOIS.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Kishwaukee River, 
DeKalb, Illinois. 
(10) NAVAJO
CREEK, PALOS
HEIGHTS, ILLI-
NOIS.—Project for flood damage reduction, Navajo 
Creek, Palos Heights, Illinois. 
(11) STONY
CREEK, OAK
LAWN, ILLINOIS.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Stony Creek, Oak 
Lawn, Illinois. 
(12) VICINITY OF THE 71ST STREET DITCH, JUS-
TICE, ILLINOIS.—Project for flood damage reduction, 
in the vicinity of the 71st Street Ditch, Justice, Illi-
nois. 
(13) WEST
BRANCH
OF
MILL
CREEK, PALOS 
PARK, ILLINOIS.—Project for flood damage reduction, 
West Branch of Mill Creek, Palos Park, Illinois. 
(14) DRY
RUN
CREEK, WATERLOO, IOWA.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Dry Run Creek, 
Waterloo, Iowa. 
(15) LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Louisville, Kentucky. 
(16) BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Baltimore City, Maryland, 
in the vicinity of Druid Hill Park. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(17) PINE
TREE
BROOK, 
AVON, 
MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for flood damage reduction, Pine 
Tree Brook, Avon, Massachusetts. 
(18) PINE
TREE
BROOK, MILTON, MASSACHU-
SETTS.—Project for flood damage reduction, Pine 
Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts. 
(19) HARDING CANAL SEAWALL, DETROIT, MICHI-
GAN.—Project for flood damage reduction, Harding 
Canal Seawall, Detroit, Michigan. 
(20) BIG
RIVER, HIGH
RIDGE, MISSOURI.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Big River, High 
Ridge, Missouri. 
(21) SAW MILL RIVER BASIN, GREEHBURGH, NEW 
YORK.—Project for flood damage reduction, Saw Mill 
River basin, Greehburgh, New York. 
(22) SPARKILL
CREEK, 
ORANGETOWN, 
NEW 
YORK.—Project for flood damage reduction, Sparkill 
Creek, Orangetown, New York. 
(23) INDEPENDENCE, OHIO.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Independence, Ohio. 
(24) VALLEY
VIEW, OHIO.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Valley View, Ohio. 
(25) WINYEH BAY, GEORGETOWN, SOUTH CARO-
LINA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Winyeh 
Bay, Georgetown, South Carolina. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(26) DEL RIO, VAL VERDE, TEXAS.—Project for 
flood damage reduction, Del Rio, Val Verde, Texas. 
(27) CRAFORD BAY SEAWALL, PORTSMOUTH, VIR-
GINIA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Craford 
Bay Seawall, Portsmouth, Virginia. 
(28) SOUTHERN
BRANCH
OF
THE
ELIZABETH 
RIVER, PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Southern Branch of the Elizabeth 
River, Portsmouth, Virginia. 
(29) ROXBURY AND WESTPOINT TOWNSHIPS, WIS-
CONSIN.—Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction, 
Roxbury and Westpoint Townships, Wisconsin. 
SEC. 
1003. 
SMALL 
PROJECTS 
FOR 
EMERGENCY 
STREAMBANK PROTECTION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r): 
(1) NAKNEK RIVER, NAKNEK, ALASKA.—Project 
for emergency streambank protection, Naknek River, 
Naknek, Alaska. 
(2) QUINNIPIAC
RIVER, 
NEW
HAVEN, 
CON-
NECTICUT.—Project for emergency streambank protec-
tion, Quinnipiac River, New Haven, Connecticut. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(3) BISCAYNE BAY, NORTH BAY VILLAGE, FLOR-
IDA.—Project for emergency streambank protection, 
Biscayne Bay, North Bay Village, Florida. 
(4) BRONX
RIVER, NEW
YORK, NEW
YORK.— 
Project for emergency streambank protection, Bronx 
River, New York, New York. 
(5) OHIO RIVER, IRONTON, OHIO.—Project for 
emergency streambank protection, Ohio River, Iron-
ton, Ohio. 
(6) NEWPORT, 
RHODE
ISLAND.—Project for 
emergency streambank protection, Newport, Rhode Is-
land. 
(7) TIVERTON, 
RHODE
ISLAND.—Project for 
emergency streambank protection, Tiverton, Rhode Is-
land. 
SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577): 
(1) DETROIT RIVER, WYANDOTTE, MICHIGAN.— 
Project for navigation, Detroit River, Wyandotte, 
Michigan. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(2) STOUTS CREEK, LACEY TOWNSHIP, NEW JER-
SEY.—Project for navigation, Stouts Creek, Lacey 
Township, New Jersey. 
(3) BROWN’S
RIVER, 
NASSAU
COUNTY, 
NEW 
YORK.—Project for navigation, Brown’s River, Nas-
sau County, New York. 
(4) DETROIT HARBOR, WISCONSIN.—Project for 
navigation, Detroit Harbor, Wisconsin. 
SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE 
QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is appropriate, may carry out the project under sec-
tion 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2309a): 
(1) RHEEM
CREEK, CONTRA
COSTA
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—Project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Rheem Creek, Contra Costa Coun-
ty, California. 
(2) RODEO
CREEK, CONTRA
COSTA
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.—Project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Rodeo Creek, Contra Costa Coun-
ty, California. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM 
AND ESTUARY RESTORATION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is appropriate, may carry out the project under sec-
tion 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2330): 
(1) EMERYVILLE
HARBOR, EMERYVILLE, CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
restoration, Emeryville Harbor, Emeryville, Cali-
fornia. 
(2) 
LOS
ANGELES
RIVER, 
CUDAHY, 
CALI-
FORNIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
restoration, Los Angeles River, Cudahy, California. 
(3) LAGUNA SALADA, PACIFICA, CALIFORNIA.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Laguna Salada, Pacifica, California. 
(4) ANIMAS
RIVER, LA
PLATA, COLORADO.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Animas River, La Plata, Colorado. 
(5) NORTH
FORK
OF
THE
GUNNISON
RIVER, 
DELTA, COLORADO.—Project for aquatic ecosystem 
and estuary restoration, North Fork of the Gunnison 
River, Delta, Colorado. 
(6) LINE AND CANE CREEKS, HENRY COUNTY, 
GEORGIA.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
restoration, Line and Cane Creeks, Henry County, 
Georgia. 
(7) BREMME CREEK, DUPAGE, ILLINOIS.—Project 
for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Bremme Creek, DuPage, Illinois. 
(8) BLACKBERRY CREEK, KENDALL, ILLINOIS.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Blackberry Creek, Kendall, Illinois. 
(9) GOMPERS PARK, NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO 
RIVER, ILLINOIS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and 
estuary restoration, Gompers Park, North Branch 
Chicago River, Illinois. 
(10) KANKAKEE
RIVER, WILL
COUNTY, ILLI-
NOIS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary res-
toration, Kankakee River, Will County, Illinois. 
(11) PRAIRIE CREEK WATERSHED, WILL COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
restoration, Prairie Creek Watershed, Will County, Il-
linois. 
(12) WEST
BRANCH
OF
THE
DUPAGE
RIVER, 
DUPAGE, ILLINOIS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem 
and estuary restoration, West Branch of the DuPage 
River, DuPage, Illinois. 
(13) LONG
CREEK
WATERSHED, CUMBERLAND, 
MAINE.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
restoration, Long Creek Watershed, Cumberland, 
Maine. 
(14) 
CABIN
BRANCH
WATERSHED, 
PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem and estuary restoration, Cabin Branch Wa-
tershed, Prince George’s County, Maryland. 
(15) LITTLE
PAINT
BRANCH
STREAM, PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem and estuary restoration, Little Paint 
Branch Stream, Prince George’s County, Maryland. 
(16) 
LOWER
BEAVERDAM
CREEK, 
PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem and estuary restoration, Lower Beaverdam 
Creek, Prince George’s County, Maryland. 
(17) NORTHEAST
ANACOSTIA
RIVER, 
PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem and estuary restoration, Northeast Ana-
costia River, Prince George’s County, Maryland. 
(18) NORTHWEST
ANACOSTIA
RIVER, PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND.—Project for aquatic 
ecosystem and estuary restoration, Northwest Ana-
costia River, Prince George’s County, Maryland. 
(19) ASSABET RIVER, MIDDLESEX AND WORCES-
TER, MASSACHUSETTS.—Project for aquatic ecosystem 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
and estuary restoration, Assabet River, Middlesex and 
Worcester, Massachusetts. 
(20) LEWIS BAY, YARMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Lewis Bay, Yarmouth, Massachusetts. 
(21) PIG’S EYE LAKE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Pig’s Eye Lake, St. Paul, Minnesota. 
(22) BARNEGAT BAY, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JER-
SEY.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary res-
toration, Barnegat Bay, Ocean County, New Jersey. 
(23) BRANCHPORT
CREEK, OCEANPORT
BOR-
OUGH, NEW JERSEY.—Project for aquatic ecosystem 
and estuary restoration, Branchport Creek, Oceanport 
Borough, New Jersey. 
(24) HACKENSACK RIVER, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW 
JERSEY.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary 
restoration, Hackensack River, Hudson County, New 
Jersey. 
(25) LAKE TOPANEMUS, FREEHOLD, NEW JER-
SEY.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary res-
toration, Lake Topanemus, Freehold, New Jersey. 
(26) LAS CRUCES DAM, DONA ANA, NEW MEX-
ICO.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary res-
toration, Las Cruces Dam, Dona Ana, New Mexico. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(27) PUGSLEY
CREEK, 
CASTLE
HILL, 
NEW 
YORK.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary res-
toration, Pugsley Creek, Castle Hill, New York. 
(28) OLENTANGY
RIVER, FRANKLIN, OHIO.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Olentangy River, Franklin, Ohio. 
(29) SCIOTO RIVER, FRANKLIN, OHIO.—Project 
for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, Scioto 
River, Franklin, Ohio. 
(30) WOONASQUATUCKET
RIVER, PROVIDENCE, 
RHODE ISLAND.—Project for aquatic ecosystem and 
estuary restoration, Woonasquatucket River, Provi-
dence, Rhode Island. 
(31) CLAYTOR
LAKE, 
PULASKI, 
VIRGINIA.— 
Project for aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration, 
Claytor Lake, Pulaski, Virginia. 
SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal participa-
tion in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property’’, approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g): 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(1) DEERFIELD
BEACH, 
BROWARD
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—Project for shoreline protection, Deerfield 
Beach, Broward County, Florida. 
(2) BARNEGAT, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.— 
Project for shoreline protection, Barnegat, Ocean 
County, New Jersey. 
(3) MANHASSET BAY, PORT WASHINGTON, NEW 
YORK.—Project for shoreline protection, Manhasset 
Bay, Port Washington, New York. 
SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CON-
TROL. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to 
carry out a project for aquatic nuisance plant control in 
the Republican River basin, Colorado, under section 104 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610). 
(b) SPECIAL RULE.—In carrying out the project under 
subsection (a), the Secretary may control and eradicate 
riverine nuisance plants. 
TITLE II—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
SEC. 2001. CREDIT FOR IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS. 
(a) 
LIMITATION; 
SAVINGS
PROVISION.—Section 
221(a)(4)(E) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d–5b(a)(4)(E)) is amended by striking clause (ii) and 
inserting the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
‘‘(ii) LIMITATION.—In any case in 
which a specific provision of law provides 
for a non-Federal interest to receive credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
a study for, or construction or operation 
and maintenance of, a water resources 
project, the Secretary shall apply— 
‘‘(I) the specific provision of law 
instead of this paragraph; or 
‘‘(II) at the request of the non- 
Federal interest, the specific provision 
of law and such provisions of this 
paragraph as the non-Federal interest 
may request. 
‘‘(iii) SAVINGS
PROVISION.—Nothing 
in this subparagraph affects the applica-
bility of subsection (a)(4)(C).’’. 
(b) WATER RESOURCES PROJECT DEFINED.—Section 
221(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(b)) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; 
(2) by moving subparagraphs (A) and (B) (as so 
redesignated) and the matter following such subpara-
graphs 2 ems to the right; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(3) by striking ‘‘(b)’’ and all that follows through 
‘‘The term’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
‘‘(1) NON-FEDERAL INTEREST.—The term’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(2) WATER
RESOURCES
PROJECT.—The term 
‘water resources project’ includes projects studied, re-
viewed, designed, constructed, operated and main-
tained, or otherwise subject to Federal participation 
under the authority of the civil works program of the 
Secretary of the Army for the purposes of navigation, 
flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, hurri-
cane and storm damage reduction, water supply, 
recreation, hydroelectric power, fish and wildlife con-
servation, water quality, environmental infrastruc-
ture, resource protection and development, and related 
purposes.’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 221(c) of such 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(c)) is amended by striking 
‘‘enforcible’’ and inserting ‘‘enforceable’’. 
SEC. 2002. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION. 
(a) MITIGATION PLANS AS PART OF PROJECT PRO-
POSALS.—Section 906(d)(1) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)(1)) is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(1) in the first sentence— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘for damages to ecological 
resources, including terrestrial and aquatic re-
sources, and’’ after ‘‘mitigate’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘ecological resources and’’ 
after ‘‘impact on’’; and 
(C) by inserting ‘‘without the implementa-
tion of mitigation measures’’ before the period; 
and 
(2) by inserting before the last sentence the fol-
lowing: ‘‘If the Secretary determines that mitigation 
to in-kind conditions is not possible, the Secretary 
shall identify in the report the basis for that deter-
mination.’’. 
(b) 
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS.—Section 
906(d)(3)(A) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)(3)(A)) is 
amended by inserting ‘‘, at a minimum,’’ after ‘‘complies 
with’’. 
SEC. 2003. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS. 
Section 2006 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2242) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to 
project studies that include— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
‘‘(1) a feasibility study, as defined in section 
105(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(d)); or 
‘‘(2) a detailed project report, as defined in such 
section 105(d) and carried out under section 107(a) 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577(a)).’’. 
SEC. 2004. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREE-
MENT. 
Section 2008(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2340(a)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following: ‘‘This subsection shall apply without 
regard to whether the original partnership agreement was 
entered into before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
this subsection.’’. 
SEC. 2005. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW. 
(a) TIMING OF PEER REVIEW.—Section 2034(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
2343(b)) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (4); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) REASONS FOR TIMING.—If the Chief of En-
gineers does not initiate a peer review for a project 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
study at a time described in paragraph (2), the Chief 
shall make publicly available, including on the Inter-
net, for each of such times the reasons for not con-
ducting the review, and shall include the reasons in 
the decision document for the project study.’’. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PANELS.—Section 2034(c)(4) 
of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2343(c)(4)) is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(4) CONGRESSIONAL
AND
PUBLIC
NOTIFICA-
TION.—Upon identification of a project study for peer 
review under this section, but prior to initiation of 
the review by the panel of experts, the Chief of Engi-
neers shall— 
‘‘(A) notify the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
the House of Representatives of the review; and 
‘‘(B) make publicly available, including on 
the Internet, information on— 
‘‘(i) the dates scheduled for beginning 
and ending the review; 
‘‘(ii) the entity that has the contract 
for the review; and 
‘‘(iii) the names and qualifications of 
the panel of experts.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(c) RECOMMENDATIONS OF PANEL.—Section 2034(f) of 
such Act (33 U.S.C. 2343(f)) is amended by striking para-
graph (2) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(2) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY AND TRANSMITTAL TO 
CONGRESS.—After receiving a report on a project 
study from a panel of experts under this section, the 
Chief of Engineers shall make available to the public, 
including on the Internet, and transmit to the Com-
mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Sen-
ate and the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure of the House of Representatives— 
‘‘(A) a copy of the report within 3 days of 
receiving the report; and 
‘‘(B) a copy of any written response of the 
Chief of Engineers on recommendations con-
tained in the report within 3 days of the date of 
the response. 
‘‘(3) INCLUSION IN PROJECT STUDY.—A report 
on a project study from a panel of experts under this 
section and the written response of the Chief of Engi-
neers shall be included in the final decision document 
for the project study.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2006. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW. 
Section 2035 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2344) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘(i) NONAPPLICABILITY OF FACA.—The Federal Advi-
sory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a 
safety assurance review conducted under this section.’’. 
SEC. 2007. FUNDING FOR HARBOR MAINTENANCE PRO-
GRAMS. 
(a) HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND GUAR-
ANTEE.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The total budget resources 
made available from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 
Fund each fiscal year pursuant to section 9505(c) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to ex-
penditures from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 
Fund) shall be equal to the level of receipts plus inter-
est credited to the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 
for that fiscal year. Such amounts may be used only 
for harbor maintenance programs described in section 
9505(c) of such Code. 
(2) GUARANTEE.—No funds may be appro-
priated for harbor maintenance programs described 
in such section unless the amount described in para-
graph (1) has been provided. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi-
nitions apply: 
(1) TOTAL
BUDGET
RESOURCES.—The term 
‘‘total budget resources’’ means the total amount made 
available by appropriations Acts from the Harbor 
Maintenance Trust Fund for a fiscal year for making 
expenditures under section 9505(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986. 
(2) LEVEL OF RECEIPTS PLUS INTEREST.—The 
term ‘‘level of receipts plus interest’’ means the level 
of taxes and interest credited to the Harbor Mainte-
nance Trust Fund under section 9505 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 for a fiscal year as set forth in 
the President’s budget baseline projection as defined 
in section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177) for 
that fiscal year submitted pursuant to section 1105 of 
title 31, United States Code. 
SEC. 2008. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS. 
Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 
2169; 120 Stat. 318; 120 Stat. 3197; 121 Stat. 1067; 123 
Stat. 3478) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘permits under 
the jurisdiction’’ and inserting ‘‘permits of such enti-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
ties related to projects for a public purpose under the 
jurisdiction’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection 
(e); 
(3) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(b) EFFECT ON PERMITTING.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds ac-
cepted under subsection (a) will not impact impartial 
decision-making with respect to permits, either sub-
stantively or procedurally. 
‘‘(2) IMPARTIAL DECISIONMAKING.—In carrying 
out this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
evaluation of permits carried out using funds accept-
ed under this section shall— 
‘‘(A) be reviewed by the District Com-
mander of the Corps District in which the 
project or activity is located, unless the evalua-
tion of the permit is initially conducted by the 
District Commander whereby the review shall be 
conducted by the Commander of the Corps Divi-
sion in which the District is located; and 
‘‘(B) utilize the same procedures for deci-
sions that would otherwise be required for the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
evaluation of permits for similar projects or ac-
tivities not carried out using funds authorized 
under this section. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—None of the 
funds accepted under this section shall be used to carry out 
a review of the evaluation of permits required under sub-
section (b)(2)(A). 
‘‘(d) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary shall en-
sure that all final permit decisions carried out using funds 
authorized under this section are made available to the pub-
lic, including on the Internet.’’; and 
(4) in subsection (e) (as redesignated), by strik-
ing ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 
SEC. 2009. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 
OF ENVIRONMENT. 
Section 1135(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(d)) is amended by striking 
‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
SEC. 2010. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORA-
TION. 
Section 206(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330(d)) is amended by striking 
‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2011. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION 
AND HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 314 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2321) is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 314. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION 
AND HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES. 
‘‘Activities currently performed by personnel under the 
direction of the Secretary in connection with the operation 
and maintenance of navigation or hydroelectric power gen-
erating facilities, including all personnel under the direc-
tion of the Secretary in connection with the operation and 
maintenance of navigational infrastructure such as flood-
gates, locks, and dams, at Corps of Engineers water re-
sources projects, are considered to be inherently govern-
mental functions and not commercial activities. This sec-
tion does not prohibit contracting out major maintenance 
or other functions that are currently contracted out or 
studying services not directly connected with project main-
tenance and operations.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
contained in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by striking 
the item relating to section 314 and inserting the following: 
‘‘Sec. 314. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric facili-
ties.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6213
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2012. REPEAL. 
Section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (31 U.S.C. 6505 note; 114 Stat. 2592), and the item 
relating to such section in the table of contents in section 
1(b) of such Act, are repealed. 
SEC. 2013. COST ESTIMATES FOR FEASIBILITY REPORTS. 
Section 905(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(5) COST
ESTIMATES
FOR
FEASIBILITY
RE-
PORTS.—In preparing a feasibility report under this 
subsection, the Secretary shall include in the report, 
and any budget documents (including justification 
materials) submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of 
title 31, United States Code, an accounting of the 
total cost of the recommended plan and an estimate 
of the Federal and non-Federal participation in the 
plan based on the following scenarios: 
‘‘(A) The cost of the project based on opti-
mal levels of Federal funding for the rec-
ommended plan. 
‘‘(B) The estimated cost of the project, based 
on a 50 percent increase in the period for imple-
mentation of the recommended plan. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
‘‘(C) The estimated cost of the project, based 
on a 100 percent increase in the period for im-
plementation of the recommended plan.’’. 
SEC. 2014. MITIGATION STATUS REPORT. 
Section 2036(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2283a) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (4); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) INFORMATION INCLUDED.—In reporting the 
status of all projects included in the report, the Sec-
retary shall— 
‘‘(A) use a uniform methodology for deter-
mining the status of all projects included in the 
report; 
‘‘(B) use a methodology that describes both 
a qualitative and quantitative status for all 
projects in the report; and 
‘‘(C) provide specific dates for and partici-
pants in the consultations required under section 
906(d)(4)(B) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)(4)(B)).’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2015. USE OF AMERICAN IRON, STEEL, AND MANUFAC-
TURED GOODS. 
(a) RESTRICTION.—None of the funds authorized or 
otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a 
project unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods 
used in the project are produced in the United States. 
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply in 
any case or category of cases in which the Secretary finds 
that— 
(1) applying subsection (a) would be inconsistent 
with the public interest; 
(2) iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured 
goods are not produced in the United States in suffi-
cient and reasonably available quantities and of a 
satisfactory quality; or 
(3) inclusion of iron, steel, and manufactured 
goods produced in the United States will increase the 
cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent. 
(c) PUBLIC NOTICE OF WAIVER REQUEST.—If the Sec-
retary receives a request to waive the application of sub-
section (a), the Secretary shall publish in a timely manner 
that request online and in the Federal Register. 
(d) JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVER.—If the Secretary de-
termines that it is necessary to waive the application of 
subsection (a) based on a finding under subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall publish online and in the Federal Register 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
a detailed written justification as to why the provision is 
being waived. 
(e) APPLICATION.—This section shall be applied in a 
manner consistent with United States obligations under 
international agreements. 
TITLE III—PROJECT-RELATED 
PROVISIONS 
SEC. 3001. DOUGLAS HARBOR, JUNEAU, ALASKA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for navigation, Douglas Harbor, 
Juneau, Alaska, being carried out under section 107 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall be 
$7,000,000. 
SEC. 3002. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CON-
TROL PROJECT, ARIZONA. 
The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tribu-
taries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) 
and modified by section 303 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), section 302 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2600), 
and section 3008 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (121 Stat. 1107), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
$55,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $50,100,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,400,000. 
SEC. 3003. RIO DE FLAG, ARIZONA. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Rio de Flag, 
Flagstaff, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576) 
and modified by section 3007 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1107), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $77,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$50,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$27,000,000. 
SEC. 3004. TRES RIOS, ARIZONA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Ari-
zona, authorized by section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
cost of $230,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$149,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$80,500,000. 
SEC. 3005. RUSSIAN RIVER PROJECT, SONOMA COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA. 
The project for flood control, water conservation, and 
related purposes in the Russian River basin, California, au-
thorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(64 Stat. 177), and the project for Russian River, Dry 
Creek, California, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), are modified as follows: 
(1) The Secretary shall review the biological 
opinion on the water supply, flood control, and chan-
nel maintenance operations conducted by the Corps of 
Engineers, the Sonoma County Water Agency, and 
the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control 
District, as transmitted by the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration on September 24, 2008. 
(2) If the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary is authorized to construct the 
project at a total cost of $92,000,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $59,800,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $32,200,000. 
SEC. 3006. SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The project for flood control, environmental restora-
tion, and recreation, South Sacramento County streams, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(8) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modi-
fied to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $104,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $67,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$36,800,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3007. CHATFIELD RESERVOIR, COLORADO. 
Section 116 of the Energy and Water Development and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009 (123 Stat. 608) 
is amended by striking ‘‘Colorado Department of Natural 
Resources is authorized’’ and inserting ‘‘Colorado Depart-
ment of Natural Resources, or its assignee, is authorized’’. 
SEC. 3008. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND 
TEXAS. 
Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1213) is amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ 
and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 
SEC. 3009. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF 
COLUMBIA. 
The project for flood control, Potomac River, Wash-
ington, District of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the 
Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688; 49 Stat. 1574) and 
modified by section 301(a)(4) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3707) and section 309 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
301), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to con-
struct the project at a Federal cost of $8,100,000, in accord-
ance with the post authorization change report dated June 
29, 1998. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3010. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FLORIDA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Kissimmee River 
Restoration, Florida, authorized by section 101(8) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $852,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $426,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $426,000,000. 
SEC. 3011. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLORIDA. 
The project for navigation and related purposes, Ponce 
de Leon Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, authorized by sec-
tion 101(b)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct the project at a total cost of $15,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $8,500,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $6,500,000. 
SEC. 3012. SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GEORGIA. 
The project for navigation, Savannah Harbor expan-
sion, Georgia, authorized by section 101(b)(9) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $675,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $405,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$270,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3013. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL 
BARRIERS PROJECT, ILLINOIS. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 3061(b)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1121) is 
amended— 
(1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier 
I in its current location or at an alternative lo-
cation, as determined appropriate by the Sec-
retary;’’; 
(2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘June 14, 
2005’’ and inserting ‘‘November 21, 2003, as amended 
on July 14, 2005’’; 
(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), 
and (E) as subparagraphs (D), (E) and (F), respec-
tively; 
(4) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(C) acquire real estate interests necessary 
for the construction, operation, and maintenance 
of Barrier I and Barrier II;’’; 
(5) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara-
graph (E) (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
subsection); 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(6) by striking the period at the end of subpara-
graph (F) (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
subsection) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(7) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(G) construct additional barriers or other 
fish deterrents at other locations in the vicinity 
of the Chicago Area Waterway System, if deter-
mined appropriate by the Secretary.’’. 
(b) USE OF CREDIT.—Section 3061(b)(2) of such Act 
(121 Stat. 1121) is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph 
(1)(E)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)(F)’’. 
(c) FEASIBILITY STUDY.—Section 3061(d) of such Act 
(121 Stat. 1121) is amended by adding the end the fol-
lowing: ‘‘The study shall include a fully developed analysis 
of an alternative for hydrologic separation between the 
Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basins. The hydro-
logic separation alternative shall include identification of 
measures to prevent the transfer of aquatic nuisance species 
between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basins 
through surface water.’’. 
SEC. 3014. LOWER OHIO RIVER, ILLINOIS AND KENTUCKY. 
The project for navigation, Lower Ohio River, Locks 
and Dams 52 and 53, Illinois and Kentucky, authorized 
by section 3(a)(6) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the Sec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
retary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$1,991,000,000. 
SEC. 3015. WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, 
MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River 
Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois, au-
thorized by section 1001(20) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1053), is modified to author-
ize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$120,000,000, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$78,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$42,000,000. 
SEC. 3016. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA. 
The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, In-
diana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115) and modified 
by section 127 of the Energy and Water Appropriations 
Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$275,000,000, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$206,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$69,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3017. RHODES POINT JETTY, SMITH ISLAND, MARY-
LAND. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for navigation, Rhodes Point Jetty, 
Smith Island, Maryland, being carried out under section 
107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $7,000,000. 
SEC. 3018. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSA-
CHUSETTS. 
Section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656) is amended by striking ‘‘draft 
evaluation report of the New England District Engineer en-
titled ‘Phase I Muddy River Master Plan’, dated June 
2000’’ and inserting ‘‘Final Decision Document and Envi-
ronmental Assessment Report of the New England District 
Engineer entitled ‘Muddy River Flood Control and Eco-
system Restoration, Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts’, 
dated September 2003, at a total cost of $79,200,000’’. 
SEC. 3019. ADA, MINNESOTA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for flood damage reduction, Wild 
Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried out under section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall 
be $10,600,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3020. MONTEVIDEO, MINNESOTA. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for flood damage reduction, Monte-
video, Minnesota, being carried out under section 205 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be 
$10,000,000. 
SEC. 3021. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA. 
Section 3101(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1133) is amended by striking 
‘‘$7,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$14,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3022. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. 
The project for flood control, Blue River basin, Kansas 
City, Missouri, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $45,500,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $34,125,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $11,375,000. 
SEC. 3023. LOWER ASSUNPINK CREEK, TRENTON, NEW JER-
SEY. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality of 
the environment, Lower Assunpink Creek, Trenton, New 
Jersey, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall 
be $10,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3024. OCEAN GATE, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for emergency streambank protec-
tion, Ocean Gate, Ocean County, New Jersey, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 701r), shall be $4,500,000. 
SEC. 3025. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK. 
Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781), as amended by section 3122 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 
1139), is further amended by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$27,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3026. SPRING CREEK, NEW YORK. 
The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality of 
the environment, Spring Creek, New York, being carried out 
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall be $6,000,000. 
SEC. 3027. HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OHIO. 
Section 1001(37)(B)(iii) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1055) is amended by striking 
‘‘$1,270,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3028. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER AND TILLAMOOK BAY 
ECOSYSTEM 
RESTORATION, 
OREGON 
AND 
WASHINGTON. 
Section 536(g) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2662) is amended by striking 
‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3029. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS 
CHRISTI, TEXAS. 
The project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, 
Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, authorized by section 
1001(40) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(121 Stat. 1056) is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $447,604,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $183,827,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $263,777,000. 
SEC. 3030. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS. 
The project for flood control, Trinity River and tribu-
taries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 
Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
purposes’’, approved March 2, 1945, and modified by sec-
tion 5141 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(121 Stat. 1253), is further modified to authorize the Sec-
retary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$882,000,000, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
$573,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$308,700,000. 
SEC. 3031. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, 
TEXAS. 
The project for navigation and environmental restora-
tion, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, au-
thorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666), is modified to author-
ize the Secretary to extend the boundaries of the Galveston 
channel approximately 2600 feet beyond Pier 38, if the Sec-
retary determines that the extension is feasible. 
SEC. 3032. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATION. 
The following project may be carried out by the Sec-
retary and no construction on any such project may be ini-
tiated until the Secretary determines that the project is fea-
sible: The Vincennes, Indiana portion of the project for flood 
control, Wabash River basin, Illinois and Indiana, author-
ized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 
649) and deauthorized by section 1002 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4209). 
SEC. 3033. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The following projects are not au-
thorized after the date of enactment of this Act: 
(1) POTOMAC
RIVER, WASHINGTON
CHANNEL, 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.—The portion of the project 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
for navigation, Potomac River, Washington Channel, 
District of Columbia, authorized by the Act of August 
30, 1935 (chapter 831; 49 Stat. 1028), beginning at 
Washington Harbor Channel Geometry Centerline of 
the 400-foot-wide main navigational ship channel, 
Centerline Station No. 103+73.12, coordinates North 
441,948.20, East 1,303,969.30, as stated and depicted 
on the Condition Survey Anacostia, Virginia, Wash-
ington and Magazine Bar Shoal Channels, Wash-
ington, D.C., Sheet 6 of 6, prepared by the United 
States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore district, 
July 2007; thence departing the aforementioned cen-
terline traveling the following courses and distances: 
N. 40 degrees 10 minutes 45 seconds E., 200.00 feet 
to a point, on the outline of said 400-foot-wide chan-
nel thence binding on said outline the following three 
courses and distances: S. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 
seconds E., 1,507.86 feet to a point, thence; S. 29 de-
grees 44 minutes 42 seconds E., 2,083.17 feet to a 
point, thence; S. 11 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds E., 
363.00 feet to a point, thence; S. 78 degrees 32 min-
utes 56 seconds W., 200.00 feet to a point binding on 
the centerline of the 400-foot-wide main navigational 
channel 
at 
computed 
Centerline 
Station 
No. 
65+54.31, coordinates North 438,923.9874, East 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
1,306,159.9738, thence; continuing with the aforemen-
tioned centerline the following courses and distances: 
N. 11 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds W., 330.80 feet 
to a point, Centerline Station No. 68+85.10, thence; 
N. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds W., 2,015.56 feet 
to a point, Centerline Station No. 89+00.67, thence; 
N. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds W., 1,472.26 feet 
to the point of beginning. 
(2) CHICAGO HARBOR, ILLINOIS.—The portion of 
the project for navigation, Chicago Harbor, author-
ized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899 
and March 2, 1919, beginning at the southwest corner 
of Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago 
sluice gate that abuts the north wall of the Chicago 
River Lock thence running north for approximately 
290 feet, thence running east approximately 1,000 
feet, thence running south approximately 290 feet, 
thence running west approximately 1,000 feet to the 
point of origin. 
(3) IPSWICH RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—The por-
tion of the project for navigation, Ipswich River, Mas-
sachusetts, adopted by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
August 5, 1886, consisting of a 4-foot channel located 
at the entrance to the inner harbor at Ipswich Har-
bor, lying northwesterly of a line commencing at: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
N3,074,938.09, E837,154.87, thence running easterly 
approximately 60 feet to a point with coordinates 
N3,074,972.62, E837,203.93. 
(4) MENEMSHA CREEK, MASSACHUSETTS.—The 
portion of the project for navigation, Menemsha 
Creek, Massachusetts, authorized by the River and 
Harbor Act of 1945, consisting of the following 
areas— 
(A) beginning at a point, N129,112.54, 
E1,566,926.30, running north 52 degrees 12 
minutes 55.9 seconds east 208.68 feet to a point 
N129,240.39, E1,567,091.22, running south 77 
degrees 28 minutes 13.7 seconds east 170.0 feet 
to a point N129,203.51, E1,567,257.17, running 
south 37 degrees 25 minutes 45.4 seconds east 
101.04 
feet 
to 
a 
point 
N129,123.28, 
E1,567,318.58, running north 77 degrees 28 
minutes 13.7 seconds west 223.32 feet to a point 
N129,171.72, E 1,567,100.58, running south 52 
degrees 12 minutes 55.9 seconds west 174.00 feet 
to a point N129,065.12, E1,566,963.06, running 
north 37 degrees 47 minutes 04.1 seconds west 
60.00 feet to the point of origin, and 
(B) beginning at a point, N128,895.78, 
E1,566,940.39, thence running north 52 degrees 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
31 minutes 25.8 seconds east 135.91 feet to a 
point N128,978.47, E1,567,048.25, thence run-
ning south 77 degrees 28 minutes 13.7 seconds 
east 
80.63 
feet 
to 
a 
point 
N128,960.98, 
E1,567,126.96, thence running south 37 degrees 
25 minutes 32.9 seconds east 70.67 feet to a 
point N128,904.86, E1,567,169.91, thence run-
ning north 73 degrees 59 minutes 15.6 seconds 
west 139.90 feet to a point N128,943.45, E 
1,567,035.44, thence running south 52 degrees 31 
minutes 25.8 seconds west 103.96 feet to a point 
N128,880.20, E1,566,952.94, thence running 
north 38 degrees 50 minutes 43.8 seconds west 
20.01 feet to the point of origin. 
(5) BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RHODE 
ISLAND.—The portion of the project for navigation, 
Block Island Harbor of Refuge, Rhode Island, adopted 
by the Rivers and Harbors Act of July 11, 1870, con-
sisting of the cut-stone breakwater lining the west side 
of the Inner Basin, beginning at a point, N32,179.55, 
E312,625.53, thence running northerly approximately 
76.59 feet to a point with coordinates N326,655.92, 
E312,631.32, thence running northerly approximately 
206.81 feet to a point with coordinates N32,858.33, 
E312,673.74, thence running easterly approximately 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
109.00 feet to a point with coordinates N32,832.15, 
E312,779.54. 
(b) ADDITIONAL DEAUTHORIZATIONS.—The following 
projects are not authorized after the date of enactment of 
this Act, except with respect to any portion of such a project 
that has been completed before such date or is under con-
struction on such date: 
(1) The project for flood protection and related 
purposes, Cache River basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 172). 
(2) The Lower White River, Big Creek and tribu-
taries, Arkansas, element of the project for flood con-
trol and improvement of the Lower Mississippi River, 
authorized by section 1 of the Act of May 15, 1928 
(45 Stat. 534), and modified by section 204 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076). 
(3) The project for navigation, Noyo River and 
Harbor, California, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and 
modified by section 146 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2931). 
(4) The project for navigation, Red River Water-
way, Shreveport, Louisiana, to Dangerfield, Texas, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 
Stat. 731). 
(5) The project for flood control, Hocking River 
at Logan, Ohio, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4122). 
(6) The Shipyard River Upper Channel and 
Upper Turning basin elements of the project for navi-
gation, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, author-
ized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4096). 
(7) The environmental enhancements element of 
the project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek and 
Johns Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi, authorized 
by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124). 
(8) The recreation element of the project for flood 
control, Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, Tennessee 
and Mississippi, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4124). 
(9) The project for flood protection, Santa Bar-
bara County Coastal Streams and tributaries in the 
area of Goleta, California, authorized by section 201 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826) and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
modified by section 102(b) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804). 
(10) The project for flood control, Harris Fork 
Creek, Tennessee and Kentucky, authorized by section 
102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
(90 Stat. 2921). 
(11) The project for flood control, Buena Vista, 
Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(24) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4610) and modified by section 118(f) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4824). 
TITLE IV—STUDIES 
SEC. 4001. HOLLIS, ALASKA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements, Hollis, Alaska. 
SEC. 4002. BULLARD WASH, GOODYEAR, ARIZONA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Bullard Wash, Goodyear, Arizona. 
SEC. 4003. LOWER SANTA CRUZ RIVER, CASA GRANDE, ARI-
ZONA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tion and related water resource purposes for the Lower 
Santa Cruz River study area, Casa Grande, Arizona. 
SEC. 4004. MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, recreation, and related 
water resource purposes, including nonstructural solutions, 
for Maricopa County, Arizona. 
SEC. 4005. OUACHITA RIVER, OUACHITA, UNION, AND ASH-
LEY COUNTIES, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, flood 
damage reduction, environmental restoration, bank sta-
bilization, and related water resource purposes for the 
Ouachita River, Ouachita, Union, and Ashley Counties, Ar-
kansas. 
SEC. 4006. OIL TROUGH, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Oil Trough, Arkansas. 
SEC. 4007. RANDOLPH COUNTY, ARKANSAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Randolph County, Arkansas. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4008. BERKELEY MARINA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements for Berkeley Marina, Berkeley, California. 
SEC. 4009. CHELSEA WETLANDS, HERCULES, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration and flood damage reduction for Chelsea Wetlands, 
Hercules, California. 
SEC. 4010. COLORADO LAGOON AND ALAMITOS BAY, LONG 
BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration between Colorado Lagoon and Alamitos Bay, Long 
Beach, California. 
SEC. 4011. LODI LAKE, LODI, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and streambank stabilization for Lodi Lake, Lodi, 
California. 
SEC. 4012. OAKLAND-INNER HARBOR TIDAL CANAL, OAK-
LAND, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation improve-
ments for the Oakland-Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, Oakland, 
California. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4013. NOYO HARBOR DISTRICT, NOYO, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements and dredge material disposal for Noyo Harbor 
District, Noyo, California. 
SEC. 4014. PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements, flood damage reduction, shoreline protection, 
environmental restoration, and related water resource pur-
poses for Port of San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 
SEC. 4015. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements and dredge material disposal for Redwood City 
Navigation Channel, California. 
SEC. 4016. RIALTO CHANNEL AND CACTUS CHANNEL, RI-
ALTO, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction for Rialto Channel and Cactus Channel, 
Rialto, California. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4017. SACRAMENTO REGIONAL SANITATION DISTRICT, 
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion in the Sacramento Regional Sanitation District, Sac-
ramento, California. 
SEC. 4018. SAN PABLO BAY, HERCULES, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements for San Pablo Bay, Hercules, California. 
SEC. 4019. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for navigation channel 
deepening for Stockton, California. 
SEC. 4020. TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORA-
TION, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, water supply, water qual-
ity, recreation, and other water-related issues including the 
impacts of water flows from Mexico for the Tijuana River 
basin, San Diego, California. 
SEC. 4021. TIJUANA RIVER WETLANDS RESTORATION, SAN 
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
toration and wetland restoration along the Tijuana River, 
San Diego County, California. 
SEC. 4022. VENTURA RIVER, VENTURA COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Ventura River, Ventura County, California. 
SEC. 4023. WILLOWBROOK, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out a project for environ-
mental restoration for Willowbrook, Los Angeles County, 
California. 
SEC. 4024. FOUNTAIN CREEK WATERSHED, PUEBLO, COLO-
RADO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a sediment impact anal-
ysis study to determine the sediment transport parameters 
for Fountain Creek watershed, Pueblo, Colorado. 
SEC. 4025. RALSTON CREEK, ARVADA, COLORADO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction for Ralston Creek, Arvada, Colorado. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4026. HOLLY POND AND NOROTAN RIVER, STAMFORD, 
CONNECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for environmental res-
toration for Holly Pond and Norotan River, Stamford, Con-
necticut. 
SEC. 4027. HOUSATONIC RIVER, NEW MILFORD, CON-
NECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion along the Housatonic River, New Milford, Connecticut. 
SEC. 4028. LONG ISLAND SOUND AND MILL RIVER, STAM-
FORD, CONNECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements for Long Island Sound and Mill River, Stam-
ford, Connecticut. 
SEC. 4029. MERIDEN, CONNECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
damage reduction for Meriden, Connecticut. 
SEC. 4030. SOUTH COVE, OLD SAYBROOK, CONNECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for the South Cove, Old Saybrook, Connecticut. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4031. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, WEST HAVEN, 
CONNECTICUT. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection, 
storm damage reduction, including a review of bulkhead 
condition for West River, New Haven Harbor, West Haven, 
Connecticut. 
SEC. 4032. CHESAPEAKE BAY, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
VIRGINIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for enhanced public ac-
cess and recreational opportunities on Army Corps of Engi-
neers projects in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware, Maryland, 
and Virginia. 
SEC. 4033. WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, including green technologies, for Washington, District 
of Columbia. 
SEC. 4034. LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and environmental protection, Lake County, Florida. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4035. MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Mar-
ion County, Florida. 
SEC. 4036. MIAMI, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Miami, Florida. 
SEC. 4037. OAKLAND PARK, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Oakland Park, Florida. 
SEC. 4038. RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction and shoreline protection for Riviera 
Beach, Florida. 
SEC. 4039. SOUTH DAYTONA, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes for South Daytona, Florida. 
SEC. 4040. TAMPA, FLORIDA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and environmental restoration for Tampa, Florida. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4041. PEAVINE CREEK, DECATUR, GEORGIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and environmental restoration, recreation, and related 
water resource purposes for Peavine Creek, Decatur, Geor-
gia. 
SEC. 4042. RICHLAND CREEK, LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Richland Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia. 
SEC. 4043. STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY, GEORGIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study of municipal and industrial water supply for the 
State of Georgia. 
(b) STUDY COMPONENTS.—In conducting the study, 
the Secretary shall review— 
(1) currently available water supplies; 
(2) expected future demand for potable water; 
(3) current water uses, including per capita use 
rates; 
(4) opportunities to augment existing supplies, 
including through increased conservation and im-
proved efficiencies; 
(5) the effect of water supply policies and uses 
on the environment; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(6) the effect of water supply policies on the 
economy; 
(7) the effect of water supply policies and uses 
on upstream and downstream uses; 
(8) the impacts of water supply policies on 
threatened and endangered species; and 
(9) the impacts of consumptive uses on instream 
uses. 
(c) TIMING.—The Secretary shall complete the study 
not later than 2 years following the first obligation of funds 
for the study. 
SEC. 4044. SUWANNEE CREEK, LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Suwannee Creek, Lawrenceville, Georgia. 
SEC. 4045. AGAT AND MERIZO, GUAM. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage reduc-
tion and shoreline protection for Agat and Merizo, Guam. 
SEC. 4046. WAIAKEA STREAM AND PALAI STREAM, HILO, HA-
WAII. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project 
for flood damage reduction along Waiakea Stream and 
Palai Stream, Hilo, Hawaii. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(b) PRIOR WORK.—In carrying out the study, the Sec-
retary shall utilize, to the extent practicable, any work un-
dertaken in the formulation of a project for flood damage 
reduction, Waiakea Stream and Palai Stream, Hilo, Ha-
waii, initiated under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s). 
SEC. 4047. WAIALUA-KAIAKA WATERSHED, OAHU, HAWAII. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, water supply, and related 
water resource purposes for the Waialua-Kaiaka watershed, 
Oahu, Hawaii. 
SEC. 4048. ALBANY PARK, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Albany Park, Chicago, Illinois. 
SEC. 4049. CARPENTER CREEK, CARPENTERSVILLE, ILLI-
NOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and stream bank stabilization for Carpenter Creek, 
Carpentersville, Illinois. 
SEC. 4050. DES PLAINES RIVER, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tion and stream bank stabilization for the Des Plaines 
River, Cook County, Illinois. 
SEC. 4051. FERSON-OTTER CREEK DAM, ST. CHARLES, ILLI-
NOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and stream bank stabilization for Ferson-Otter Creek 
Dam, St. Charles, Illinois. 
SEC. 4052. MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ILLINOIS AND MIS-
SOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of developing a program for environmental res-
toration for the Middle Mississippi River, Illinois and Mis-
souri. 
SEC. 4053. NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, CHI-
CAGO, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration and related water resource purposes for the North 
Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois. 
SEC. 4054. RIVER PARK AND RONAN PARK, NORTH BRANCH 
OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
toration and shoreline protection for River Park and Ronan 
Park, North Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois. 
SEC. 4055. THILLENS PARK, NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHI-
CAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, and shoreline protection 
for Thillens Park, North Branch of the Chicago River, Chi-
cago, Illinois. 
SEC. 4056. VILLAGE OF SKOKIE, ILLINOIS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Village of Skokie, Illinois. 
SEC. 4057. BOWMAN CREEK, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Bowman Creek, South Bend, Indiana. 
SEC. 4058. LAKE MICHIGAN WATERSHED, INDIANA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion, and related water resource purposes for the Lake 
Michigan watershed, Indiana. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4059. BURLINGTON, IOWA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and stream bank stabilization for Burlington, Iowa. 
SEC. 4060. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, LOU-
ISIANA AND MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of utilizing the Federal hopper dredge Wheeler, 
as part of routine testing and use under its ready reserve 
status pursuant to section 3 of the Act of August 11, 1888 
(33 U.S.C. 622(c); 110 Stat. 3705), for support of projects 
for the beneficial reuse of material dredged from federally 
maintained waterways at the following locations: 
(1) Projects in connection with the comprehen-
sive plan for protecting, preserving, and restoring the 
coastal Louisiana ecosystem, pursuant to section 7002 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1270). 
(2) Projects in connection with the project for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, Mississippi 
Coastal Improvements Program, Hancock, Harrison, 
and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, authorized by sec-
tion 1001 of this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4061. JESUIT BEND, PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LOU-
ISIANA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project 
for flood damage reduction for Jesuit Bend, Plaquemines 
Parish, Louisiana. 
(b) USE OF LOCAL REPORT.—In carrying out the 
study, the Secretary may include elements of the report pre-
pared by the non-Federal interest for Jesuit Bend, 
Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, if the Secretary determines 
that such elements are feasible. 
SEC. 4062. LABRANCHE WETLANDS, ST. CHARLES AND ST. 
JOHN COUNTIES, LOUISIANA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project 
for flood control and improvement of the Lower Mississippi 
River, Bonnet Carre Spillway, authorized by section 1 of 
the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), to add environ-
mental restoration as a project purpose. 
(b) REVIEW.—In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall review operational and structural changes to the 
project to restore the LaBranche Wetlands, St. Charles and 
St. John Counties, Louisiana. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 
4063. 
RUTH 
CANAL 
FRESHWATER 
DIVERSION, 
VERMILION, LOUISIANA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
the improvement of Bayou Teche and the Vermilion River, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the Flood Control Act 
of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 641), and the project for flood 
protection in the Teche-Vermilion basins, Louisiana, au-
thorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 
(80 Stat. 1420), to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
a project for environmental restoration and water supply, 
Ruth Canal, Vermilion, Louisiana. 
SEC. 
4064. 
ANACOSTIA 
RIVER 
WATERSHED, 
PRINCE 
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Anacostia River watershed, Prince George’s 
County, Maryland. 
SEC. 4065. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE STUDY, MARY-
LAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA. 
In carrying out the study for the Chesapeake Bay 
Shoreline, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, being 
carried out under the Committee Resolution of the Com-
mittee on Environment and Public Works of the United 
States Senate, adopted May 23, 2001, the Secretary shall 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects on feder-
ally owned property for shoreline protection, environmental 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
restoration, and improvement of water quality of the Chesa-
peake Bay. 
SEC. 4066. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, BALTIMORE 
HARBOR, MARYLAND. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements and dredged material disposal at Cox Creek 
Dredged Material Disposal Site for Baltimore Harbor, 
Maryland. 
SEC. 4067. MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND RECREATION AND 
PUBLIC ACCESS, MARYLAND. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island 
project for enhanced public access and recreational opportu-
nities on Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island, Maryland, as author-
ized by section 1001 of this Act. 
SEC. 4068. CAPISIC BROOK, PORTLAND, MAINE. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for environmental res-
toration, flood damage reduction, and stormwater manage-
ment for Capisic Brook, Portland, Maine. 
SEC. 4069. FISHING AND GOOSEBERRY ISLANDS, KITTERY, 
MAINE. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for storm damage reduc-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tion and shoreline protection for Fishing and Gooseberry 
Islands, Kittery, Maine. 
SEC. 4070. SOUTHERN MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE DREDGED 
MATERIAL DISPOSAL STUDY, MAINE AND NEW 
HAMPSHIRE. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements and dredge material disposal for southern 
Maine and New Hampshire. 
SEC. 4071. ASSABET, CHARLES, AND SUDBURY WATER-
SHEDS, MIDDLESEX AND ESSEX COUNTIES, 
MASSACHUSETTS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for flood damage reduction, environmental restora-
tion, and related water resource purposes, Assabet, Charles, 
and Sudbury watersheds, Middlesex and Essex Counties, 
Massachusetts. 
SEC. 4072. HOOSIC RIVER WATERSHED, NORTH ADAMS, 
MASSACHUSETTS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction, environmental restora-
tion, and related water resource purposes for Hoosic River 
watershed, North Adams, Massachusetts. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4073. MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED, MASSACHUSETTS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for the Mystic River watershed, Massachusetts. 
SEC. 4074. QUEQUECHAN RIVER, FALL RIVER, MASSACHU-
SETTS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration, recreation, and related water resource purposes for 
the Quequechan River, Fall River, Massachusetts. 
SEC. 4075. CLINTON RIVER, CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MICHI-
GAN. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes for Clinton River, Clinton Township, Michigan. 
SEC. 4076. HAMILTON DAM, FLINT, MICHIGAN. 
In carrying out the review under the authority of sec-
tion 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) 
of the project for flood control, Flint River, Michigan, au-
thorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 311), the Secretary shall include a review of Ham-
ilton Dam, Flint, Michigan. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4077. UPPER PENINSULA FLOOD RECOVERY, MICHI-
GAN. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion and related water resource purposes for Upper Penin-
sula Flood Recovery, Michigan. 
SEC. 4078. AMORY, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Amory, Mississippi. 
SEC. 4079. COASTAL MISSISSIPPI ECOSYSTEM RESTORA-
TION, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for environmental res-
toration and related water resource purposes for coastal 
Mississippi. 
SEC. 4080. FULTON, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Fulton, Mississippi. 
SEC. 4081. GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements, Gulfport, Mississippi. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4082. LUCEDALE, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, water supply, recreation, and related water resource 
purposes for Lucedale, Mississippi. 
SEC. 4083. MAGBY CREEK AND VERNON BRANCH, LOWNDES 
COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Magby Creek and Vernon Branch in Lowndes 
County, Mississippi. 
SEC. 4084. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the project for flood protection and 
other purposes in the Blue River basin, vicinity of Kansas 
City, Missouri and Kansas, authorized by section 201 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (80 Stat. 1409), to include 
additional flood damage reduction, environmental restora-
tion, and recreational measures, Kansas City, Missouri. 
SEC. 4085. LITTLE BLUE RIVER, JACKSON COUNTY, MIS-
SOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for stream bank sta-
bilization for Little Blue River, Jackson County, Missouri. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4086. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, especially examining the floodwall pump station, for 
St. Louis, Missouri. 
SEC. 4087. LAS VEGAS WASH, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Las Vegas Wash, Las Vegas, Nevada. 
SEC. 4088. NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
The Secretary, in collaboration with all relevant Fed-
eral and non-Federal entities, including State and local 
governments, nonprofit organizations, academia, and the 
general public, shall conduct a comprehensive watershed 
study of all watersheds in New Hampshire for water qual-
ity, habitat degradation, environmental restoration, water 
supply, and potential impacts of climate change for New 
Hampshire. 
SEC. 4089. PISCATAQUA RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to evaluate sedi-
ment and nutrient pollution in the Piscataqua River sys-
tem to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project 
for environmental restoration and water quality for the 
Piscataqua River, New Hampshire. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4090. BARNEGAT BAY WATERSHED, OCEAN AND MON-
MOUTH COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction, shoreline protection, 
environmental restoration, and related water resource pur-
poses for Barnegat Bay watershed, Ocean and Monmouth 
Counties, New Jersey. 
SEC. 4091. BEVERLY, NEW JERSEY. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection, 
including consideration of a gabion wall, for Beverly, New 
Jersey. 
SEC. 4092. BOROUGH OF PINE BEACH, NEW JERSEY. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection, 
including consideration of floating wave attenuators off 
shore, for Borough of Pine Beach, New Jersey. 
SEC. 4093. HADDON TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Haddon Township, New Jersey. 
SEC. 4094. RAHWAY RIVER WATERSHED, NEW JERSEY. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction, environmental restora-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4105. KILL VAN KULL, PORT RICHMOND, STATEN IS-
LAND, NEW YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for storm damage reduc-
tion, shoreline protection, and environmental restoration 
for Kill Van Kull, Port Richmond, Staten Island, New 
York. 
SEC. 4106. MARINERS MARSH AND ARLINGTON MARSH, 
STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Mariners Marsh and Arlington Marsh, Staten 
Island, New York. 
SEC. 4107. NEW YORK, NEW YORK. 
(a) INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT OF BULKHEADS AND 
SEAWALLS.— 
(1) INVENTORY.—The Secretary shall conduct an 
inventory of bulkheads and seawalls constructed 
around the city of New York, New York, including the 
boroughs of Brooklyn, the Bronx, Manhattan, Staten 
Island, and Queens. 
(2) ASSESSMENT OF REHABILITATION NEEDS.— 
In conducting the inventory required under para-
graph (1), the Secretary shall assess the condition of 
the bulkheads and seawalls and the need for rehabili-
tation or modification of the bulkheads and seawalls. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 2 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report containing the inventory and 
assessment required by subsection (a). 
(c) INTERIM ACTIONS.—If the Secretary determines 
that a bulkhead or seawall referred to in subsection (a) pre-
sents an imminent and substantial risk to public safety, 
the Secretary may carry out measures to prevent or miti-
gate that risk. 
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of assistance provided under this section shall be 65 percent. 
(e) COORDINATION.—In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall coordinate with the appropriate officials of 
the city of New York and the State of New York. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$7,000,000, to remain available until expended. 
SEC. 4108. NORTON BASIN INLET, FAR ROCKAWAY, NEW 
YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for storm damage reduc-
tion and shoreline protection for Norton Basin Inlet, Far 
Rockaway, New York. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4109. QUEENS, NEW YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage reduc-
tion and shoreline protection, Queens, New York, between 
116th and 156th Streets. 
SEC. 4110. ROCKAWAY BEACH SEAWALL, ROCKAWAY, NEW 
YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for storm damage reduc-
tion and shoreline protection for Rockaway Beach Seawall, 
Rockaway, New York. 
SEC. 4111. ROOSEVELT ISLAND, EAST RIVER, NEW YORK, 
NEW YORK. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion and shoreline protection for Roosevelt Island, East 
River, New York, New York. 
SEC. 4112. CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for environmental res-
toration in support of the Surface Water Improvement and 
Management Initiative for Charlotte, North Carolina. 
SEC. 4113. NANTAHALA RIVER, SWAIN, NORTH CAROLINA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
toration, recreation, and related water resource purposes, 
Nantahala River, Swain, North Carolina. 
SEC. 4114. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SOUTH AND 
CENTRAL NORTH DAKOTA, NORTH DAKOTA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Missouri River and tributaries, South and Cen-
tral North Dakota, North Dakota. 
SEC. 4115. BIG CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood 
damage reduction and environmental restoration for Big 
Creek watershed, Ohio. 
SEC. 4116. BRANDYWINE CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction and environmental res-
toration for Brandywine Creek watershed, Ohio. 
SEC. 4117. CARLISLE TOWNSHIP, LORAIN COUNTY, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Carlisle Township, Lorain County, Ohio. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 
4118. 
CUYAHOGA 
RIVER 
WATERSHED 
AND 
TUSCARAWAS RIVER WATERSHED, SUMMIT 
COUNTY, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for flood damage reduction, environmental restora-
tion, and related water resource purposes, Cuyahoga River 
watershed and Tuscarawas River watershed, Summit Coun-
ty, Ohio. 
SEC. 4119. EUCLID CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood 
damage reduction and environmental restoration for Euclid 
Creek watershed, Ohio. 
SEC. 4120. HEALY CREEK, BRUNSWICK, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration, streambank erosion, and sedimentation control for 
Healy Creek, Brunswick, Ohio. 
SEC. 4121. LOWER MAUMEE RIVER, TOLEDO, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Lower Maumee River, Toledo, Ohio. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4122. OHIO RIVER, OHIO. 
Section 4070 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (121 Stat. 1183) is amended by striking ‘‘Ohio 
River’’ and inserting ‘‘Ohio River and tributaries’’. 
SEC. 4123. SHAKER LAKES, SHAKER HEIGHTS AND CLEVE-
LAND HEIGHTS, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Shaker Lakes, Shaker Heights and Cleveland 
Heights, Ohio. 
SEC. 4124. STARK COUNTY, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and environmental restoration for Stark County, Ohio. 
SEC. 4125. TINKERS CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood 
damage reduction and environmental restoration for Tin-
kers Creek watershed, Ohio. 
SEC. 4126. UPPER TUSCARAWAS RIVER, CUYAHOGA COUN-
TY, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for the Upper Tuscarawas River, Cuyahoga County, 
Ohio. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4127. WEST CREEK WATERSHED, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study to de-
termine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood 
damage reduction and environmental restoration for West 
Creek watershed, Ohio. 
SEC. 4128. YELLOW CREEK AND SHORT CREEK, JEFFERSON 
COUNTY, OHIO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion and environmental restoration for Yellow Creek and 
Short Creek, Jefferson County, Ohio. 
SEC. 4129. FERRY CREEK RESERVOIR, BROOKINGS, OR-
EGON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Ferry Creek Reservoir, Brookings, Oregon. 
SEC. 4130. OREGON NAVIGATION JETTIES AND BREAK-
WATERS, OREGON. 
(a) INVENTORY
AND ASSESSMENT
OF NAVIGATION 
JETTIES AND BREAKWATERS.— 
(1) INVENTORY.—The Secretary shall conduct an 
inventory of federally constructed navigation jetties 
and breakwaters in the State of Oregon. 
(2) ASSESSMENT OF REHABILITATION NEEDS.— 
In conducting the inventory required under para-
graph (1), the Secretary shall assess the condition of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
the navigation jetties and breakwaters and the need 
for rehabilitation or modification of the jetties and 
breakwaters. 
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 2 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report containing the inventory and 
assessment required by subsection (a). 
(c) INTERIM ACTIONS.—If the Secretary determines 
that a jetty or breakwater referred to in subsection (a) pre-
sents an imminent and substantial risk to public safety, 
the Secretary may carry out measures to prevent or miti-
gate that risk. 
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 
of assistance provided under this section shall be 65 percent. 
(e) COORDINATION.—In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall coordinate with the appropriate officials of 
the State of Oregon. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$7,000,000, to remain available until expended. 
SEC. 4131. PORT ORFORD, OREGON. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational im-
provements with examination of navigational breakwaters 
for Port Orford, Oregon. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4132. BUHL LAKE, SHARON, PENNSYLVANIA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a multi-
purpose project for flood damage reduction and environ-
mental restoration for Buhl Lake, Sharon, Pennsylvania. 
(b) PRIOR WORK.—In carrying out the study, the Sec-
retary shall utilize, to the extent practicable, any work un-
dertaken in the formulation of a project for environmental 
restoration, Buhl Lake, Sharon, Pennsylvania, initiated 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679). 
SEC. 4133. DELAWARE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, BUCKS 
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive water-
shed study to determine the feasibility of carrying out 
projects for flood damage reduction and environmental res-
toration for the Delaware River and tributaries, Bucks 
County, Pennsylvania. 
SEC. 4134. ELK CREEK, MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration and water quality for Elk Creek, Meadville, Penn-
sylvania. 
SEC. 4135. MILL CREEK, ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tion, focusing on the Mill Creek Drift Catcher, for Mill 
Creek, Erie, Pennsylvania. 
SEC. 4136. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for the Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania. 
SEC. 4137. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE RE-
DUCTION. 
Section 4077 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (121 Stat. 1184) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Mahoning 
River basin, Pennsylvania’’ and inserting ‘‘Mahoning 
River basin, Pennsylvania, the Monongahela River 
basin, Pennsylvania’’; and 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Shaler Town-
ship’’ and inserting ‘‘Shaler Township, Hampton 
Township, Harmar Township’’. 
SEC. 4138. GUAYAMA, PUERTO RICO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction for Guayama, Puerto Rico. 
SEC. 4139. RINCON, PUERTO RICO. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tion and shoreline protection for the Municipality of 
Rincon, Puerto Rico. 
SEC. 4140. PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage reduc-
tion and related water resource purposes for the rivers in 
Providence, Rhode Island. 
SEC. 4141. SOUTH CAROLINA. 
The Secretary, in collaboration with all relevant Fed-
eral and non-Federal entities, including State and local 
governments, nonprofit organizations, academia, and the 
general public, shall conduct comprehensive watershed stud-
ies of all 8 watersheds in South Carolina for water quality, 
habitat condition, environmental restoration, water supply, 
and the potential impacts of climate change for South Caro-
lina. 
SEC. 4142. JAMES RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of modifying the project for channel restoration 
and improvements on the James River, South Dakota, au-
thorized by section 401(b) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128) to add ecosystem restora-
tion and watershed improvements as project purposes. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SEC. 4143. STATION CAMP CREEK, GALLATIN, TENNESSEE. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental res-
toration for Station Camp Creek, Gallatin, Tennessee. 
SEC. 4144. BRAZOS RIVER, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study assessing the long- 
term impacts of water use, withdrawal, recirculation, and 
downstream impacts on the Whitney Lake Reservoir, Texas. 
SEC. 4145. HICKORY CREEK, CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, 
TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Hickory Creek, City of Balch Springs, Texas. 
SEC. 4146. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS 
(BARBOURS CUT), TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility 
of modifying the Barbours Cut element of the project for 
navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Gal-
veston Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 
101(a)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3666), to a depth of 45 feet. 
SEC. 4147. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility 
of carrying out a project for dredged material disposal in 
the vicinity of the project for navigation and environmental 
restoration, 
Houston-Galveston 
Navigation 
Channels, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666). 
SEC. 4148. SIMSBORO AQUIFER, CITY OF BASTROP, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of utilizing the Simsboro Aquifer for water sup-
ply for the City of Bastrop, Texas. 
SEC. 4149. NAVASOTA RIVER WATERSHED, GRIMES COUNTY, 
TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, and related water resource 
purposes for the Navasota River watershed, Grimes County, 
Texas. 
SEC. 4150. RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion, environmental restoration, and water supply for the 
Rio Grande basin, Texas. 
SEC. 4151. ROMA, TEXAS. 
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduc-
tion for Roma, Texas. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:09 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5892.RH
H5892
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS