HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $25,370,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,707,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $25,769,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $25,211,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $26,829,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $25,966,000,000.
(4) Energy (270):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $1,225,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$115,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $1,676,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $965,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$266,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $1,117,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$355,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $1,104,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$291,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $1,228,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$149,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $1,308,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$43,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $2,401,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $590,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $2,495,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $989,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $2,472,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,160,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $2,396,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,132,000,000.
(5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $28,833,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $26,361,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $29,643,855,000.
(B) Outlays, $29,251,538,450.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $27,390,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,480,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $28,169,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $27,913,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $28,392,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $28,118,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $28,408,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $28,268,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $29,074,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $28,735,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $29,799,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $29,231,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $31,070,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,338,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $31,623,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,975,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $32,867,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,958,000,000.
(6) Agriculture (350):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $35,290,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $32,654,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $26,189,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,541,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $25,655,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,026,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $25,527,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $24,117,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $25,382,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $23,897,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $23,933,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,333,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $22,565,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,991,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $20,693,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,107,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $19,881,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,404,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $18,939,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,578,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $19,168,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,770,000,000.
(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $2,516,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$771,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $7,694,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $4,459,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $8,603,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $3,231,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $12,889,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,654,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,083,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $12,729,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,434,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $13,598,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,288,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $13,918,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,375,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $14,332,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,674,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $18,793,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,903,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $13,587,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,875,000,000.
(8) Transportation (400):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $62,130,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $51,681,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $62,156,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $56,082,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $64,751,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,952,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $66,248,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $60,797,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $67,741,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $62,549,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $69,347,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $64,303,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $70,953,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $65,535,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $72,578,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $67,008,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $74,248,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $68,664,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $75,759,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(B) Outlays, $69,976,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $77,835,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $71,900,000,000.
(9) Community and Regional Development (450):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $11,225,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,366,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,228,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,560,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $10,318,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,088,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $10,567,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,780,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $10,920,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,408,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $11,243,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,179,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $11,545,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(B) Outlays, $10,325,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $11,844,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,507,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $12,146,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,783,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $12,338,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,048,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $12,844,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,345,000,000.
(10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social
Services (500):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $76,886,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $69,790,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$110,856,700,000.
(B) Outlays, $78,353,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $94,870,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $90,064,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$100,875,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $95,270,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$108,361,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $102,509,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$114,752,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $109,992,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$120,924,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $116,602,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$127,409,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $123,230,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$133,285,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $130,009,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$138,583,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $135,697,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$145,533,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $142,324,000,000.
(11) Health (550):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$182,604,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $175,512,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$216,052,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $213,242,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$242,906,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $239,126,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$260,309,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $258,514,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$257,859,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $255,591,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$271,154,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $269,004,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$291,758,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $289,047,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$312,905,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $310,457,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$335,471,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $333,359,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$360,544,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $358,901,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$389,308,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $387,174,000,000.
(12) Medicare (570):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$217,531,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $217,708,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$229,128,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $229,075,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$243,946,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $243,718,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$260,240,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $260,446,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$291,770,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $291,696,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$309,921,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $309,660,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$336,143,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $336,366,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$362,842,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $362,744,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$391,122,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $390,848,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$423,445,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $423,698,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$459,396,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $459,390,000,000.
(13) Income Security (600):
Fiscal year 2001:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$255,942,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $256,932,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$278,801,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $274,943,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$281,124,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $281,660,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$292,431,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $291,586,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$307,066,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $305,698,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$314,915,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $313,407,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$322,128,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $320,620,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$336,555,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $335,198,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$348,003,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $346,343,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$358,590,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $356,942,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$370,342,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $368,149,000,000.
(14) Social Security (650):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $9,805,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,805,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $10,865,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(B) Outlays, $10,864,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $11,315,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,315,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $11,852,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,852,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $12,387,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,387,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $13,038,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,038,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $13,739,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,739,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $14,750,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,750,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $15,927,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,927,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $17,289,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,289,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $18,799,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,799,000,000.
(15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $46,675,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $45,926,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $53,789,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $53,060,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $54,088,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $53,771,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $56,024,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $55,641,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $60,007,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $59,567,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $59,395,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,929,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $58,637,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $58,180,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $62,418,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $62,020,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $63,767,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $63,396,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $65,075,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $64,736,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $67,366,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $66,931,000,000.
(16) Administration of Justice (750):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $30,577,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $30,003,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $32,370,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $31,828,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $31,899,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $32,116,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $33,592,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,056,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $34,629,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,688,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $35,651,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $35,279,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $36,609,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $36,119,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $37,563,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $37,116,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $38,539,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,090,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $39,189,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,842,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $40,767,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $40,204,000,000.
(17) General Government (800):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $16,307,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,065,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $16,671,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,326,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $16,313,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,263,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $16,680,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,627,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $17,035,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,726,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) New budget authority, $17,492,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $17,921,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,504,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $17,981,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,691,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $18,426,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $17,995,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $18,706,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,285,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $19,430,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $18,911,000,000.
(18) Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$274,914,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $274,914,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$256,950,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $256,950,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$248,868,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $248,868,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$243,332,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $243,332,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$236,526,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(B) Outlays, $236,526,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$232,792,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $232,792,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$230,097,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $230,097,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$226,779,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $226,779,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$222,750,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $222,750,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$217,745,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $217,745,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
$212,513,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $212,513,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(19) Allowances (920):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $81,000,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $81,000,000,000.
(C) The Senate finds that—
(i) given the apparent economic slow-
down, the Congress should stimulate the
economy by passing a 1-year true tax cut
stimulus package that provides income tax
and payroll tax relief;
(ii) for real economic stimulus the 1-
year tax cut should equal approximately 1
percent of the gross domestic product, or
$95,000,000,000;
(iii) a meaningful economic stimulus
must reach as many taxpayers as possible,
or at least 120 million people;
(iv) the broadest range of taxpayers
can be reached by offering a direct rebate
based on income tax liability or payroll tax
liability; and
(v) the tax stimulus bill should be im-
mediate and take effect on or before July 1,
2001.
HCON 83 EAS
(D) It is the sense of the Senate that the lev-
els in this resolution assume that the Senate
should as soon as practical consider and pass a
stimulus tax package pursuant to this budget
resolution that will result in a rebate of—
(i) up to $500 per individual or
$1,000 per couple for 95 million taxpayers
who pay income tax; and
(ii) up to $500 for the 25 million tax-
payers who pay payroll taxes but do not
have income tax liability.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$144,106,355,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$133,916,038,450.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) New budget authority, $4,979,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $3,759,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) New budget authority, $5,470,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $4,318,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) New budget authority, $5,614,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,166,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
HCON 83 EAS
(A) New budget authority, $5,759,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,506,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) New budget authority, $5,945,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,669,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) New budget authority, $6,052,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,817,000,000.
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) New budget authority, $6,285,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,967,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) New budget authority, $6,418,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,082,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) New budget authority, $6,685,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,262,000,000.
(20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$38,265,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$38,265,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$38,803,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
(B) Outlays, ¥$38,803,000,000.
Fiscal year 2003:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$49,708,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$49,708,000,000.
Fiscal year 2004:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$56,515,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$56,515,000,000.
Fiscal year 2005:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$46,663,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$46,663,000,000.
Fiscal year 2006:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$50,661,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$50,661,000,000.
Fiscal year 2007:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$48,369,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$48,369,000,000.
Fiscal year 2008:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$49,321,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$49,321,000,000.
HCON 83 EAS
Fiscal year 2009:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$50,363,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$50,363,000,000.
Fiscal year 2010:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$51,918,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$51,918,000,000.
Fiscal year 2011:
(A) 
New 
budget 
authority,
¥$53,397,000,000.
(B) Outlays, ¥$53,397,000,000.
SEC. 103. RECONCILIATION OF REVENUE REDUCTIONS IN
THE SENATE.
The Committee on Finance of the Senate shall report
to the Senate a reconciliation bill—
(1) not later than May 18, 2001; and
(2) not later than September 14, 2001,
that consists of changes in laws within its jurisdiction suffi-
cient to reduce the total level of revenues for the period of
fiscal years 2001 through 2011 by not more than the sum
of the totals set out in section 101(1)(B) of this resolution,
and increase the total level of outlays by not more than
$60,000,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2001 through
2011.
HCON 83 EAS
TITLE 
II—BUDGET 
ENFORCE-
MENT AND RULEMAKING
SEC. 201. RESTRICTIONS ON ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—In the Senate and except as pro-
vided in subsection (b), an advance appropriations shall
be scored as new budget authority in the fiscal year in
which the advanced appropriation is enacted and not the
fiscal year in which funds become available for obligation.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—An advance appropriation that, to-
gether with funding in the current year, provides full fund-
ing of a capital project shall be scored as new budget au-
thority in the year in which the funds become available for
obligation.
SEC. 202. MECHANISM FOR IMPLEMENTING INCREASE OF
FISCAL YEAR 2002 DISCRETIONARY SPENDING
LIMITS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds the following:
(1) Unless and until the discretionary spending
limit for fiscal year 2002 (as set out in section 251(c)
of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Con-
trol Act of 1985) is increased, aggregate appropria-
tions which exceed the current law limits would still
be out of order in the Senate and subject to a super-
majority vote.
HCON 83 EAS
(2) Except for a necessary adjustment included
in function 920 (to comply with section 312(b) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974), the functional to-
tals contained in this concurrent resolution envision
a level of discretionary spending for fiscal year 2002
as follows:
(A) 
For 
the 
discretionary 
category:
$689,195,855,000 in new budget authority and
$666,521,538,450 in outlays.
(B) 
For 
the 
highway 
category:
$28,489,000,000 in outlays.
(C) 
For 
the 
mass 
transit 
category:
$5,275,000,000 in outlays.
(D) 
For 
the 
conservation 
category:
$1,760,000,000 in new budget authority and
$1,378,000,000 in outlays.
(3) To facilitate the Senate completing its legis-
lative responsibilities for the 1st Session of the 107th
Congress in a timely fashion, it is imperative that the
Senate consider legislation which establishes appro-
priate discretionary spending limits for fiscal year
2002 through 2006 as soon as possible.
(b) ADJUSTMENT TO ALLOCATIONS AND OTHER BUDG-
ETARY AGGREGATES AND LEVELS.—Whenever a bill or
joint resolution becomes law that increases the discretionary
HCON 83 EAS
spending limit for fiscal year 2002 set out in section 251(c)
of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
of 1985, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget of
the Senate shall increase the allocation called for in section
302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C.
633(a)) to the appropriate Committee on Appropriations
and shall also appropriately adjust all other budgetary ag-
gregates and levels contained in this resolution.
(c) LIMITATION
ON ADJUSTMENT.—An adjustment
made pursuant to subsection (b) shall not result in an allo-
cation under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act
of 1974 that exceeds the total budget authority and outlays
set forth in subsection (a)(2).
SEC. 203. RESERVE FUND FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS AND
MEDICARE REFORM IN THE SENATE.
If the Committee on Finance of the Senate reports a
bill or joint resolution, or a conference report thereon is sub-
mitted, which reforms the medicare program under title
XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.)
and improves the access of beneficiaries under that program
to prescription drugs, the chairman of the Committee on
the Budget of the Senate may revise committee allocations
for the Committee on Finance and other appropriate budg-
etary aggregates and allocations of new budget authority
(and the outlays resulting therefrom) in this resolution by
HCON 83 EAS
the amount provided by that bill, joint resolution, or con-
ference report, but not to exceed $300,000,000,000 for the
period of fiscal years 2002 through 2011. The total adjust-
ment made under this section for any fiscal year may not
exceed the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of the
President’s medicare reform and prescription drug plan
(or, if such a plan is not submitted in a timely manner,
the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of a comparable
plan submitted by the chairman of the Committee on Fi-
nance).
SEC. 204. APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ALLO-
CATIONS AND AGGREGATES.
(a) APPLICATION.—Any adjustments of allocations
and aggregates made pursuant to this resolution shall—
(1) apply while that measure is under consider-
ation;
(2) take effect upon the enactment of that meas-
ure; and
(3) be published in the Congressional Record as
soon as practicable.
(b) EFFECT OF CHANGED ALLOCATIONS AND AGGRE-
GATES.—Revised allocations and aggregates resulting from
these adjustments shall be considered for the purposes of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as allocations and aggre-
gates contained in this resolution.
HCON 83 EAS
(c) BUDGET COMMITTEE DETERMINATIONS.—For pur-
poses of this resolution—
(1) the levels of new budget authority, outlays,
direct spending, new entitlement authority, revenues,
deficits, and surpluses for a fiscal year or period of
fiscal years shall be determined on the basis of esti-
mates made by the Committee on the Budget of the
Senate; and
(2) the chairman may make any other necessary
adjustments to such levels to carry out this resolution.
SEC. 205. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.
Congress adopts the provisions of this title—
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the
Senate and the House of Representatives, respectively,
and as such they shall be considered as part of the
rules of each House, or of that House to which they
specifically apply, and such rules shall supersede
other rules only to the extent that they are incon-
sistent therewith; and
(2) with full recognition of the constitutional
right of either House to change those rules (so far as
they relate to that House) at any time, in the same
manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any
other rule of that House.
HCON 83 EAS
SEC. 206. RESERVE FUND FOR MEDICARE PAYMENTS TO
HOME HEALTH AGENCIES.
If the Senate Committee on Finance or the House
Committee on Ways and Means or Commerce reports a bill,
or if an amendment thereto is offered or a conference report
thereon is submitted, that repeals the 15 percent reduction
in payments under the medicare program to home health
agencies enacted by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and
now scheduled to go into effect on October 1, 2002, the chair-
man of the Committee on the Budget of the House or Senate
may increase the allocation of new budget authority and
outlays to that committee and other appropriate budgetary
aggregates and levels by the amount needed, but not to ex-
ceed $0 in new budget authority and outlays in 2002,
$4,000,000,000 for the period 2002 through 2006, and
$13,700,000,000 for the period 2002 through 2011, subject
to the condition that such legislation will not, when taken
together with all other previously-enacted legislation, reduce
the on-budget surplus below the level of the Medicare Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund surplus in any fiscal year cov-
ered by this resolution.
SEC. 207. LIMITATION ON CONSIDERATION OF AMEND-
MENTS 
UNDER 
RECONCILIATION 
AND 
A
BUDGET RESOLUTION.
(a) RECONCILIATION AND BUDGET RESOLUTIONS.—
For purposes of consideration of any reconciliation bill re-
HCON 83 EAS
ported under section 310(e) of the Congressional Budget Act
of 1974 or any budget resolution reported under section
305(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974—
(1) debate, and all amendments thereto and de-
batable motions and appeals in connection therewith,
shall be limited to not more than 50 hours;
(2) time on a bill or resolution may only be
yielded back by consent;
(3) time on amendments shall be limited to 60
minutes to be equally divided in the usual form and
on any second degree amendment or motion to 30
minutes to be equally divided in the usual form;
(4) no first degree amendment may be proposed
after the 10th hour of debate on a bill or resolution
unless it has been submitted to the Journal Clerk
prior to the expiration of the 10th hour;
(5) no second degree amendment may be pro-
posed after the 20th hour of debate on a bill or resolu-
tion unless it has been submitted to the Journal Clerk
prior to the expiration of the 20th hour; and
(6) after not more than 40 hours of debate on a
bill or resolution, the bill or resolution shall be set
aside for 1 calendar day, so that all filed amendments
are printed and made available in the Congressional
HCON 83 EAS
Record before debate on the bill or resolution con-
tinues.
(b) WAIVER
AND APPEAL.—This section may be
waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative
vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.
An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Sen-
ate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate
to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point
of order raised under this section.
SEC. 208. RESERVE FUND FOR THE PAYMENT OF RETIRED
PAY AND COMPENSATION TO DISABLED MILI-
TARY RETIREES.
If the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate or
the House of Representatives reports the Department of De-
fense authorization bill and includes a provision to fund
the payment of retired pay and compensation to disabled
military retirees, the chairman of the Committee on the
Budget of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as
applicable, may increase the allocation of new budget au-
thority and outlays to that committee by the amount of new
budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) pro-
vided by that measure for that purpose not to exceed
$2,900,000,000 in new budget authority and outlays for fis-
cal year 2002, and $40,000,000,000 in new budget author-
ity and outlays for the period of fiscal years 2002 through
HCON 83 EAS
2011, subject to the condition that such legislation will not,
when taken together with all other previously-enacted legis-
lation, reduce the on-budget surplus below the level of the
Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund Surplus in any
fiscal year covered by this resolution.
SEC. 209. RESERVE FUND FOR REFUNDABLE TAX CREDITS.
In the Senate, if any bill reported by the Committee
on Finance, amendment thereto, or conference report there-
on, has refundable tax provisions that increase outlays, the
chairman of the Committee on the Budget may increase the
amount of new budget authority (and outlays flowing there-
from) allocated to the Committee on Finance by the amount
provided by such provisions and adjust the budget aggre-
gates and reconciliation directions set forth in this resolu-
tion, as applicable, accordingly, but only to the extent that
the increase in outlays and reduction in revenues resulting
from such bill does not exceed the amounts specified in sec-
tion 101.
SEC. 210. ADDITIONAL REVENUE REDUCTIONS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution,
the revenue levels and other aggregates in this resolution
shall be adjusted to reflect an additional $69,000,000,000
in revenue reductions for the period of fiscal years 2002
through 2011.
HCON 83 EAS
SEC. 211. INCREASE FUNDING FOR IDEA.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution,
the spending aggregates, functional totals, allocations, and
other levels in this resolution shall be adjusted to reflect an
additional $70,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays
for function 500 for the period of fiscal years 2002 through
2011, and a reduction of $70,000,000,000 in revenue reduc-
tions (and an increase of $70,000,000,000 in total revenues)
for the period of fiscal years 2002 through 2011.
SEC. 212. RESERVE FUND FOR FAMILY OPPORTUNITY ACT.
If the Committee on Finance of the Senate reports a
bill or joint resolution, which provides States with the op-
portunity to expand medicaid coverage for children with
special needs, allowing families of disabled children with
the opportunity to purchase coverage under the medicaid
program for such children (commonly referred to as the
‘‘Family Opportunity Act of 2001’’), the chairman of the
Committee on the Budget of the Senate may revise com-
mittee allocations for the Committee on Finance and other
appropriate budgetary aggregates and allocations of new
budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) in
this resolution by the amount provided by that measure for
that purpose, but not to exceed $200,000,000 in new budget
authority 
and 
outlays 
for 
fiscal 
year 
2002 
and
$7,900,000,000 in new budget authority and outlays for the
period of fiscal years 2002 through 2011, subject to the con-
HCON 83 EAS
dition that such legislation will not, when taken together
with all other previously-enacted legislation, reduce the on-
budget surplus below the level of the Medicare Federal Hos-
pital Insurance Trust Fund surplus in any fiscal year cov-
ered by this resolution.
SEC. 213. RESERVE FUND FOR VETERANS’ EDUCATION.
If the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House or
the Senate reports a bill that increases the basic monthly
benefit under the Montgomery G.I. Bill to reflect the in-
creasing cost of higher education, the chairman of the Com-
mittee on the Budget of the House or Senate, as applicable,
may increase the allocation of new budget authority and
outlays to such committee by the amount of new budget au-
thority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) provided by
that measure for that purpose not to exceed $775,000,000
in new budget authority and outlays for fiscal year 2002,
$4,300,000,000 in new budget authority and outlays for the
period 
of 
fiscal 
years 
2002 
through 
2006, 
and
$9,900,000,000 in new budget authority and outlays for the
period of fiscal years 2002 through 2011, subject to the con-
dition that such legislation will not, when taken together
with all other previously-enacted legislation, reduce the on-
budget surplus below the level of the Medicare Hospital In-
surance Trust Fund surplus in any fiscal years covered by
this resolution.
HCON 83 EAS
SEC. 214. RESERVE FUND FOR PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES
AND REFUGE REVENUE SHARING.
If the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of
the Senate reports a bill, or an amendment thereto is of-
fered, or a conference report thereon is submitted, that pro-
vides full, permanent, mandatory funding for Payments in
Lieu of Taxes for entitlement lands under chapter 69 of title
31, United States Code and for Refuge Revenue Sharing,
the chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate
may increase the aggregates, functional totals, allocations
and other appropriate levels and limits in this resolution
by up to $353,000,000 in new budget authority and outlays
for fiscal year 2002 and $3,709,000,000 in new budget au-
thority and outlays for the period of fiscal years 2002
through 2011: Provided, That such legislation will not,
when taken together with all other previously enacted legis-
lation, reduce the on-budget surplus below the level of the
Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund surplus in any
fiscal year provided in this resolution.
TITLE III—MISCELLANEOUS
PROVISIONS
SEC. 301. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON DEBT REDUCTION.
It is the sense of the Senate that conservation funding
is a priority of the One Hundred Seventh Congress.
HCON 83 EAS
SEC. 302. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON AIDS AND OTHER IN-
FECTIOUS DISEASES.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution,
it is the sense of the Senate that:
(1) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds the following:
(A) HIV/AIDS, having already infected
over 58 million people worldwide, is devastating
the health, economies, and social structures in
dozens of countries in Africa, and increasingly
in Asia, the Caribbean and Eastern Europe.
(B) AIDS has wiped out decades of progress
in improving the lives of families in the devel-
oping world. As the leading cause of death in Af-
rica, AIDS has killed 17 million and will claim
the lives of one quarter of the population, mostly
productive adults, in the next decade. In addi-
tion, 13 million children have been orphaned by
AIDS—a number that will rise to 40 million by
2010.
(C) The Agency for International Develop-
ment, along with the Centers for Disease Control,
Department of Labor, and Department of De-
fense have been at the forefront of the inter-
national battle to control HIV/AIDS, with global
assistance totaling $330,000,000 from the United
States Agency for International Development
HCON 83 EAS
and $136,000,000 from other agencies in fiscal
year 2001, primarily focused on targeted preven-
tion programs.
(D) While prevention is key, treatment and
care for those affected by HIV/AIDS is an in-
creasingly critical component of the global re-
sponse. Improving health systems, providing
home-based care, treating AIDS-associated dis-
eases like tuberculosis, providing for family sup-
port and orphan care, and making anti-
retroviral drugs against HIV available will re-
duce social and economic damage to families and
communities.
(E) Pharmaceutical companies recently
dramatically reduced the prices of anti-retroviral
drugs to the poorest countries. With sufficient re-
sources, it is now possible to improve treatment
options in countries where health systems are
able to deliver and monitor the medications.
(F) The United Nations AIDS program es-
timates it will cost at least $3,000,000,000 for
basic AIDS prevention and care services in Sub-
Saharan 
Africa 
alone, 
and 
at 
least
$2,000,000,000 more if anti-retroviral drugs are
provided widely. In Africa, only $500,000,000 is
HCON 83 EAS
currently available from all donors, lending
agencies and African governments themselves.
(2) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of
the Senate that the spending levels in this budget res-
olution shall be increased by $200,000,000 in fiscal
year 2002 and by $500,000,000 in 2003 and for each
year thereafter for the purpose of helping the neediest
countries cope with the burgeoning costs of preven-
tion, care and treatment of those affected by HIV/
AIDS and associated infectious diseases.
SEC. 303. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON CONSOLIDATED
HEALTH CENTERS.
It is the sense of the Senate that appropriations for
consolidated health centers under section 330 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b) should be increased
by 100 percent over the next 5 fiscal years in order to double
the number of individuals who receive health services at
community, migrant, homeless, and public housing health
centers.
SEC. 304. FUNDING FOR DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRO-
GRAMS FOR STATE AND LOCAL LAW EN-
FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that—
(1) the national rate of serious crime dropped for
the last 8 years in a row;
HCON 83 EAS
(2) the national rate of violent crime, including
murders and rapes, is at its lowest level since 1978;
(3) the success in reducing serious crime and
violent crime rates across the Nation is due in large
part to the crime-fighting partnership between the De-
partment of Justice and State and local law enforce-
ment agencies and benefits from Department of Jus-
tice programs for State and local law enforcement as-
sistance;
(4) on February 28, 2001, President George W.
Bush submitted to Congress the Administration’s
budget highlights, ‘‘A Blueprint For New Begin-
nings,’’ which proposed ‘‘redirecting’’ $1,500,000,000
out of a total of $4,600,000,000 that has been dedi-
cated for Department of Justice programs for State
and local law enforcement assistance;
(5) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$523,000,000 for the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant Program, including $60,000,000 to the Boys
and Girls Clubs of America for grants to Boys and
Girls Clubs across the Nation, within the Department
of Justice programs for State and local law enforce-
ment assistance;
(6) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$25,500,000 for the Bulletproof Vest Partnership
HCON 83 EAS
Grant Program within the Department of Justice
programs for State and local law enforcement assist-
ance and Congress passed the Bulletproof Vest Part-
nership Grant Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–517) to
authorize $50,000,000 for the Bulletproof Vest Part-
nership Grant Program for fiscal year 2002 within
the Department of Justice programs for State and
local law enforcement assistance;
(7) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$569,050,000 for the Edward Byrne Memorial State
and Local Assistance Program for Byrne discre-
tionary and formula grants within the Department of
Justice programs for State and local law enforcement
assistance;
(8) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$686,500,000 for State prison grants, including the
Violent Offender Incarceration Grant Program and
Truth-In-Sentencing Incentive Program, within the
Department of Justice programs for State and local
law enforcement assistance;
(9) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$250,000,000 for the Juvenile Accountability Incen-
tive Block Grant Program within the Department of
Justice programs for State and local law enforcement
assistance;
HCON 83 EAS
(10) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$470,000,000 
for 
Police 
Hiring 
Initiatives,
$227,500,000 
for 
the 
Safe 
Schools 
Initiative,
$140,000,000 for the COPS Technology Program, and
$48,500,000 for the COPS Methamphetamine/Drug
‘‘Hot Spots’’ Program under the Community Oriented
Policing Services (COPS) Program within the De-
partment of Justice programs for State and local law
enforcement assistance;
(11) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$288,679,000 for grants to support the Violence
Against Women Act within the Department of Justice
programs for State and local law enforcement assist-
ance and Congress passed the Violence Against
Women Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–386) to author-
ized grants of approximately $390,000,000 for grants
to support the Violence Against Women Act for fiscal
year 2002 within the Department of Justice programs
for State and local law enforcement assistance;
(12) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$130,000,000 for the Crime Identification Technology
Act within the Department of Justice programs for
State and local law enforcement assistance;
(13) for fiscal year 2001, Congress appropriated
$279,097,000 for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
HCON 83 EAS
Prevention Programs within the Department of Jus-
tice programs for State and local law enforcement as-
sistance;
(14) in 2000, Congress passed the Computer
Crime Enforcement Act (Public Law 106–572) to au-
thorize $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 within the
Department of Justice programs for State and local
law enforcement assistance;
(15) in 2000, Congress passed the DNA Analysis
Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–
546) to authorize $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2002
within the Department of Justice programs for State
and local law enforcement assistance; and
(16) in 2000, Congress passed the Paul Coverdell
National Forensic Science Improvement Act of 2000
to authorize $85,400,000 for fiscal year 2002 within
the Department of Justice programs for State and
local law enforcement assistance.
(b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the Sen-
ate that the levels in this resolution assume an increase of
$1,500,000 for fiscal year 2002 for the following Depart-
ment of Justice programs for State and local law enforce-
ment assistance to be provided for without reduction and
consistent with previous appropriated and authorized lev-
els: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program; Boys