datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
117TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 6752 
To establish a centralized system to allow individuals to request the simulta-
neous deletion of their personal identifiers across certain data brokers, 
and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 15, 2022 
Mrs. TRAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To establish a centralized system to allow individuals to 
request the simultaneous deletion of their personal identi-
fiers across certain data brokers, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Data Elimination and 
Limiting Extensive Tracking and Exchange Act’’ or the 
‘‘DELETE Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DATA DELETION REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) DATA BROKER ANNUAL REGISTRATION.— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:11 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6752.IH
H6752
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Commis-
sion shall promulgate regulations to require any data 
broker to— 
(A) not later than 18 months after the 
date of enactment of this section, and annually 
thereafter, register with the Commission; and 
(B) provide the following information with 
such registration: 
(i) The name and primary physical, 
email, and uniform resource locator (URL) 
addresses of the data broker. 
(ii) If the data broker permits an indi-
vidual to opt out of the data broker’s col-
lection or use of personal information, cer-
tain sales of such information, or its data-
bases— 
(I) the method for requesting an 
opt-out; 
(II) any limitations on the type 
of data collection, uses, or sales for 
which an individual may opt out; and 
(III) whether the data broker 
permits an individual to authorize a 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:11 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6752.IH
H6752
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
needs of the families of passengers involved in any rail 
passenger accident involving a train of the rail passenger 
carrier and resulting in a major loss of life. 
‘‘(b) CONTENTS OF PLANS.—A plan to be submitted 
by a rail passenger carrier under subsection (a) shall in-
clude, at a minimum, the following:
‘‘(1) A plan for publicizing a reliable, toll-free 
telephone number, and for providing staff, to handle 
calls from the families of the passengers. 
‘‘(2) A process for notifying the families of the 
passengers, before providing any public notice of the 
names of the passengers, either by utilizing the serv-
ices of the organization designated for the accident 
under section 1138(a)(2) of this title or the services 
of other suitably trained individuals. 
‘‘(3) An assurance that the notice described in 
paragraph (2) will be provided to the family of a 
passenger as soon as the rail passenger carrier has 
verified that the passenger was aboard the train 
(whether or not the names of all of the passengers 
have been verified) and, to the extent practicable, in 
person. 
‘‘(4) An assurance that the rail passenger car-
rier will provide to the director of family support 
services designated for the accident under section
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 85
To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of status 
under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending 
the deadline for classification petition and labor certification filings. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2003
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for 
adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline 
for classification petition and labor certification filings.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)(B)(i)) 
is amended by striking ‘‘April 30, 2001;’’ and inserting 
‘‘April 30, 2002;’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact-
ment of the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (as en-
acted into law by Public Law 106–553).
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 860
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
in income taxes on Social Security benefits. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 13, 2003
Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 
the 1993 increase in income taxes on Social Security benefits.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1993 INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL 
SECURITY BENEFITS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social se-
curity and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
‘‘This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year 
beginning after December 31, 2002.’’
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such 
Code is amended by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ in sub-
paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’. 
(2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) 
of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public 
Law 98–21) is amended—
(i) by striking ‘‘(A) There’’ and inserting 
‘‘There’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ immediately following 
‘‘amounts equivalent to’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘, less (ii)’’ and all that 
follows and inserting a period. 
(B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act 
is amended by striking subparagraph (B). 
(C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act 
is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and by re-
designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B). 
(D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such 
Act is amended in the first sentence by striking 
‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2002.
Æ
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 505 
AN ACT 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to strengthen 
accountability for deployment of border security tech-
nology at the Department of Homeland Security, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 861
To provide that the individual income tax rate reductions of the Economic 
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 13, 2003
Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To provide that the individual income tax rate reductions 
of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 
Act of 2001 shall be permanent.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Income 
Tax Rate Reduction Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RATE REDUCTIONS MADE 
PERMANENT. 
Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
Reconciliation Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–16) is
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall not 
apply to the provisions of, and amendments made by, title 
I (relating to individual income tax rate reductions).’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 862
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security 
beneficiaries against any reduction in benefits. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 13, 2003
Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the com-
mittee concerned 
A BILL 
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect 
Social Security beneficiaries against any reduction in 
benefits.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Protec-
tion Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFICIARIES. 
Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
is amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(g) POINT OF ORDER TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECU-
RITY BENEFITS.—(1) It shall not be in order in the House 
of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or 
joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference re-
port thereon, that—
‘‘(A) reduces or has the effect of reducing any 
current benefits under the old-age, survivors, and 
disability insurance programs under title II of the 
Social Security Act; or 
‘‘(B) provides for or has the effect of providing 
for cost-of-living increases of benefits under the old-
age, survivors, and disability insurance programs 
under title II of the Social Security Act that are less 
than what would be provided under title II of the 
Social Security Act as of the day of consideration of 
the applicable measure. 
‘‘(2) As used in paragraph (1), the term ‘cur-
rent’, when referring to benefits, means benefits 
payable as of the day of consideration of the applica-
ble measure.’’.
SEC. 3. SUPER MAJORITY REQUIREMENT IN THE SENATE. 
Section 904 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘and 
312(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘312(c), and 312(g)’’; and 
(2) in subsection (d)(3), by striking ‘‘and 
312(c)’’ and by inserting ‘‘312(c), and 312(g)’’.
Æ
Calendar No. 592 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 884 
AN ACT 
To provide for the use and distribution of the funds 
awarded to the Western Shoshone identifiable 
group under Indian Claims Commission Docket 
Numbers 326–A–1, 326–A–3, and 326–K, and 
for other purposes. 
JUNE 22, 2004 
Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
‘‘(1) the terms ‘rail passenger accident’ and
‘rail passenger carrier’ have the meanings such
terms have in section 1138 of this title; and
‘‘(2) the term ‘passenger’ means a person
aboard a rail passenger carrier’s train that is in-
volved in a rail passenger accident.
‘‘(e) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—
Nothing in this section may be construed as limiting the
actions that a rail passenger carrier may take, or the obli-
gations that a rail passenger carrier may have, in pro-
viding assistance to the families of passengers involved in
a rail passenger accident.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of chap-
ters for subtitle V of title 49, United States Code, is
amended by adding after the item relating to chapter 249
the following new item:
‘‘251. FAMILY ASSISTANCE ..........................................................
25101’’.
SEC. 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF TASK FORCE.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Transpor-
tation, in cooperation with the National Transportation
Safety Board, organizations potentially designated under
section 1138(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code, rail
passenger carriers, and families which have been involved
in rail accidents, shall establish a task force consisting of
representatives of such entities and families, representa-
tives of passenger rail carrier employees, and representa-
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 506 
AN ACT 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an addi-
tional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, 
and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
108 
tions, requirements, limitations, or other 
provisions of the UVD agreement; and 
(III) claims for injury to water rights 
for land within the exterior boundaries of 
the Reservation arising after the enforce-
ability date resulting from the diversion, 
pumping, or use of water in a manner that 
is consistent with and not in violation of or 
contrary to the terms, conditions, limita-
tions, requirements, or provisions of the 
UVD agreement; 
(iii)(I) past, present, and future claims 
for injuries to water rights arising out of or 
relating to the use of water rights appur-
tenant to New Mexico 381 acres, on the con-
ditions that such water rights remain sub-
ject to the oversight and reporting require-
ments set forth in the decree in Arizona v. 
California, 376 U.S. 340 (1964), as supple-
mented, and that the State of New Mexico 
shall make available on request a copy of 
any records prepared pursuant to that de-
cree; and 
(II) past, present, and future claims 
arising out of or relating to the use of water
‘‘(B) any other person aboard the train 
without regard to whether the person paid for 
the transportation, occupied a seat, or held a 
reservation for the rail transportation; and 
‘‘(C) any other person injured or killed in 
the accident. 
‘‘(i) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—
Nothing in this section may be construed as limiting the 
actions that a rail passenger carrier may take, or the obli-
gations that a rail passenger carrier may have, in pro-
viding assistance to the families of passengers involved in 
a rail passenger accident. 
‘‘(j) RELINQUISHMENT
OF
INVESTIGATIVE
PRI-
ORITY.—
‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—This section (other than 
subsection (g)) shall not apply to a railroad accident 
if the Board has relinquished investigative priority 
under section 1131(a)(2)(B) and the Federal agency 
to which the Board relinquished investigative pri-
ority is willing and able to provide assistance to the 
victims and families of the passengers involved in 
the accident. 
‘‘(2) BOARD ASSISTANCE.—If this section does 
not apply to a railroad accident because the Board 
has relinquished investigative priority with respect to
conducting a vulnerability assessment and implemen-
tation 
of 
security 
enhancements 
to 
reduce
vulnerabilities identified in a vulnerability assess-
ment. Such assistance may include technical assist-
ance programs, training, and preliminary engineer-
ing evaluations.
‘‘(2) PARTICIPATION BY NONPROFIT ORGANIZA-
TIONS.—The Administrator may make grants to
nonprofit organizations to assist in accomplishing
the purposes of this subsection.
‘‘(3) SMALL
PUBLICLY
OWNED
TREATMENT
WORKS
DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term
‘small publicly owned treatment works’ means a
publicly owned treatment works that services a pop-
ulation of fewer than 20,000 persons.
‘‘(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There
is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator—
‘‘(1) $200,000,000 for making grants under
subsection (a); and
‘‘(2) $15,000,000 for providing technical assist-
ance under subsection (e).
Such sums shall remain available until expended.’’.
SEC. 3. REFINEMENT OF VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
METHODOLOGY 
FOR 
PUBLICLY 
OWNED
TREATMENT WORKS.
(a) GRANTS.—The Administrator of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency may make grants to a nonprofit
organization for the improvement of vulnerability self-as-
sessment methodologies and tools for publicly owned treat-
ment works, including publicly owned treatment works
that are part of a combined public wastewater treatment
and water supply system.
(b) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.—Grants provided under
this section may be used for developing and distributing
vulnerability self-assessment methodology software up-
grades, improving and enhancing critical technical and
user support functions, expanding libraries of information
addressing both threats and countermeasures, and imple-
menting user training initiatives. Such services shall be
provided at no cost to recipients.
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$1,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2003 through
2007. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2003.
Attest:
Clerk.
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 866
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
MAY 8, 2003
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works 
AN ACT 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 
enhance the security of wastewater treatment works.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 866 RFS 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wastewater Treatment 
Works Security Act of 2003’’. 
SEC. 2. WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS SECURITY. 
Title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: 
‘‘SEC. 222. WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS SECURITY. 
‘‘(a) GRANTS
FOR VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS 
AND
SECURITY
ENHANCEMENTS.—The Administrator 
may make grants to a State, municipality, or intermunic-
ipal or interstate agency—
‘‘(1) to conduct a vulnerability assessment of a 
publicly owned treatment works; 
‘‘(2) to implement security enhancements listed 
in subsection (c)(1) to reduce vulnerabilities identi-
fied in a vulnerability assessment; and 
‘‘(3) to implement additional security enhance-
ments to reduce vulnerabilities identified in a vulner-
ability assessment. 
‘‘(b) VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS.—
‘‘(1) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term 
‘vulnerability assessment’ means an assessment of 
the vulnerability of a treatment works to actions in-
tended to—
115TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5074 
AN ACT 
To authorize cyber incident response teams at the 
Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
(55) UVD 
SETTLING
PARTIES.—The term 
‘‘UVD settling parties’’ means the parties to the 
UVD agreement other than the United States, the 
San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District, and 
the Community. 
(56) WATER OM&R FUND.—The term ‘‘Water 
OM&R Fund’’ means the Gila River Indian Commu-
nity Water OM&R Trust Fund established by sec-
tion 208. 
(57) WATER RIGHT.—The term ‘‘water right’’ 
means any right in or to groundwater, surface 
water, or effluent under Federal, State, or other law. 
(58) WATER RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO NM 381 
ACRES.—The term ‘‘water rights appurtenant to NM 
381 acres’’ means the water rights—
(A) appurtenant to the 380.81 acres de-
scribed in the decree in Arizona v. California, 
376 U.S. 340, 349 (1964); and 
(B) appurtenant to other land, or for other 
uses, for which the water rights described in 
subparagraph (A) may be modified or used in 
accordance with that decree. 
(59) WATER RIGHTS FOR NM DOMESTIC PUR-
POSES.—The term ‘‘water rights for NM domestic 
purposes’’ means the water rights for domestic pur-
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 867
AN ACT
For the relief of Durreshahwar Durreshahwar,
Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and
Iqra Hasan.
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 867
AN ACT
For the relief of Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan,
Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 
1. 
PERMANENT 
RESIDENT 
STATUS 
FOR
DURRESHAHWAR 
DURRESHAHWAR, 
NIDA
HASAN, ASNA HASAN, ANUM HASAN, AND
IQRA HASAN.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)
and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna
Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan shall each be eligi-
ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma-
nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of
an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
(b) ADJUSTMENT
OF STATUS.—If Durreshahwar
Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan,
or Iqra Hasan enters the United States before the filing
deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered
to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other-
wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of
the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF
FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap-
plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica-
tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—
Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
idence to Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan,
Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan, the Secretary
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 5,
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total
number of immigrant visas that are made available to na-
tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli-
cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made
available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth
under section 202(e) of such Act.
(e) 
DENIAL
OF
PREFERENTIAL
IMMIGRATION
TREATMENT
FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
parents, 
brothers, 
and 
sisters 
of 
Durreshahwar
Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan,
and Iqra Hasan shall not, by virtue of such relationship,
be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act.
Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004.
Attest:
Clerk.