H. R. 302—182 
SEC. 533. REVIEW AND REFORM OF FAA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 
SYSTEM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY PANEL.—Not later than 90 
days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary 
of Transportation shall establish an advisory panel comprising no 
more than 7 independent, nongovernmental experts in budget, 
finance, or personnel management to review and evaluate the 
effectiveness of the FAA’s personnel management system and 
performance management program for employees not covered by 
collective bargaining agreements. 
(b) 
REVIEW, 
EVALUATION, 
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.—The 
advisory panel shall, at a minimum— 
(1) review all appropriate FAA orders, policies, procedures, 
guidance, and the Human Resources Policy Manual; 
(2) review any applicable reports regarding FAA’s personnel 
management system, including reports of the Department of 
Transportation Office of Inspector General, Government 
Accountability Office, and National Academy of Public Adminis-
tration, and determine the status of recommendations made 
in those reports; 
(3) review the personnel management system of any other 
agency or governmental entity with a similar system to the 
FAA for best practices with regard to personnel management; 
(4) assess the unique personnel authorities granted to the 
FAA, determine whether the FAA has taken full advantage 
of those authorities, and identify those authorities the FAA 
has not fully taken advantage of; 
(5) review and determine the overall effectiveness of the 
FAA’s compensation, bonus pay, performance metrics, and 
evaluation processes for employees not covered by collective 
bargaining agreements; 
(6) review whether existing performance metrics and bonus 
pay practices align with the FAA’s mission and significantly 
improve the FAA’s provision of air traffic services, implementa-
tion of air traffic control modernization initiatives, and accom-
plishment of other FAA operational objectives; 
(7) identify the highest, lowest, and average complete com-
pensation for each position of employees not covered by collec-
tive bargaining agreements; 
(8) survey interested parties and stakeholders, including 
representatives of the aviation industry, for their views and 
recommendations regarding improvements to the FAA’s per-
sonnel management system and performance management pro-
gram; 
(9) develop recommendations to address the findings of 
the work done pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (7), and 
to address views and recommendations raised by interested 
parties pursuant to paragraph (8); and 
(10) develop recommendations to improve the FAA’s per-
sonnel management system and performance management pro-
gram, including the compensation, bonus pay, performance 
metrics, and evaluation processes, for employees not covered 
by collective bargaining agreements. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after initiating the review 
and evaluation pursuant to subsection (a), the advisory panel shall 
submit a report on the results of the review and evaluation and
H. R. 302—183 
its recommendations to the Secretary, the Administrator, the appro-
priate committees of Congress. 
(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 3 months after sub-
mittal of the report pursuant to subsection (c), the Administrator 
shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 
summarizing the findings of the advisory panel that— 
(1) contains an explanation of how the Administrator will 
implement the recommendations of the advisory panel and 
measure the effectiveness of the recommendations; and 
(2) specifies any recommendations that the Administrator 
will not implement and the reasons for not implementing such 
recommendations. 
(e) SUNSET.—The advisory panel shall terminate on the date 
that is 60 days after the transmittal of the report pursuant to 
subsection (d). 
SEC. 534. NEXTGEN DELIVERY STUDY. 
(a) STUDY.—Not later than 180 days after the enactment of 
this Act, the inspector general of the Department of Transportation 
shall initiate a study of the potential impacts of a significantly 
delayed, significantly diminished, or completely failed delivery of 
the Next Generation Air Transportation System modernization ini-
tiative by the Federal Aviation Administration, including impacts 
to the air traffic control system and the national airspace system 
as a whole. 
(b) SCOPE OF STUDY.—In carrying out the study under sub-
section (a), the inspector general shall assess the Administration’s 
performance related to the NextGen modernization initiative, 
including— 
(1) the potential impacts on the operational efficiency of 
our aviation system; 
(2) an analysis of potential economic losses and stranded 
investments directly related to NextGen; 
(3) an analysis of the potential impacts to our international 
competitiveness in aviation innovation; 
(4) an analysis of the main differences that would be seen 
in our air traffic control system; 
(5) the potential impacts on the flying public, including 
potential impacts to flight times, fares, and delays in the air 
and on the ground; 
(6) the effects on supply chains reliant on air transportation 
of cargo; 
(7) the potential impacts on the long-term benefits promised 
by NextGen; 
(8) an analysis of the potential impacts on aircraft noise 
and flight paths; 
(9) the potential changes in separation standards, fuel 
consumption, flight paths, block times, and landing procedures 
or lack thereof; 
(10) the potential impacts on aircraft taxi times and aircraft 
emissions or lack thereof; 
(11) a determination of the total potential costs and 
logistical challenges of the failure of NextGen, including a 
comparison of the potential loss of the return on public and 
private sector investment related to NextGen, as compared 
to other available investment alternatives, between December 
12, 2003, and the date of enactment of this Act; and
H. R. 302—184 
(12) other matters arising in the course of the study. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of initiation 
of the study under subsection (a), the inspector general shall submit 
to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results 
of the study. 
SEC. 535. STUDY ON ALLERGIC REACTIONS. 
Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator shall— 
(1) study the prevalence of allergic reactions on board 
flights, whether airlines universally report reactions to the 
Federal Aviation Administration, and the frequency of first 
aid inventory checks to ensure medicine to prevent anaphylactic 
shock is in an aircraft; and 
(2) submit a report to the Committees on Transportation 
and Infrastructure, Energy and Commerce, and Appropriations 
of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Com-
merce, Science, and Transportation, Health, Education, Labor, 
and Pensions, and Appropriations of the Senate. 
SEC. 536. OXYGEN MASK DESIGN STUDY. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator shall conduct a study to review and evaluate 
the design and effectiveness of commercial aircraft oxygen masks. 
In conducting the study, the Administrator shall determine whether 
the current design of oxygen masks is adequate, and whether 
changes to the design could increase correct passenger usage of 
the masks. 
SEC. 537. AIR CARGO STUDY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall begin a study of international air cargo services among the 
United States and Central American, South American, and Carib-
bean Basin countries, that— 
(1) analyzes the supply of and demand for air cargo 
transportation services among the United States and Central 
American, South American, and Caribbean Basin countries; 
(2) analyzes the supply of and demand for air cargo 
transportation services between— 
(A) the United States, Central American, South Amer-
ican, and Caribbean Basin countries; and 
(B) African and European countries; 
(3) identifies the busiest routes in terms of cargo capacity 
and frequency of air service; 
(4) identifies any air carrier or foreign air carrier hubs 
in Central American, South American, and Caribbean Basin 
countries at which a significant amount of air cargo is sorted, 
handled, or consolidated for transportation to or from the 
United States; 
(5) identifies any air carrier or foreign air carrier hubs 
in the United States at which a significant amount of air 
cargo is sorted, handled, or consolidated for transportation to 
or from Central American, South American, and Caribbean 
Basin countries. 
(6) identifies any significant gaps in the air cargo services 
or cargo air carrier networks— 
(A) among the countries described in paragraph (2)(A);
H. R. 302—185 
(B) between such countries and African countries; and 
(C) between such countries and European countries; 
and 
(7) assesses the possible impact of the establishment of 
an air carrier hub in Puerto Rico at which air cargo is sorted, 
handled, or consolidated for transportation to or from the 
United States, including the impact on— 
(A) the employment rate and economy of Puerto Rico; 
(B) domestic and foreign air transportation of cargo; 
(C) United States competitiveness in the air transpor-
tation of cargo; 
(D) air cargo operations at other airports in the United 
States; and 
(E) domestic air carrier employment. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the 
study described in subsection (a). 
(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Caribbean Basin 
countries’’ has the same meaning given the term ‘‘Caribbean Basin 
country’’ in section 501 of the Food for Peace Act (7 U.S.C. 1737). 
SEC. 538. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PREVENTING THE TRANSPOR-
TATION OF DISEASE-CARRYING MOSQUITOES AND OTHER 
INSECTS ON COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT. 
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Transportation 
and the Secretary of Agriculture should, in coordination and con-
sultation with the World Health Organization, develop a framework 
and guidance for the use of safe, effective, and nontoxic means 
of preventing the transportation of disease-carrying mosquitoes and 
other insects on commercial aircraft. 
SEC. 539. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS. 
(a) AIRPORT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS AT CONGESTED 
AIRPORTS.—Section 40104(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘section 47176’’ and inserting ‘‘section 47175’’. 
(b) PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES.—Section 40117(a)(5) of title 
49, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘charge or charge’’ 
and inserting ‘‘charge’’. 
(c) OVERFLIGHTS OF NATIONAL PARKS.—Section 40128(a)(3) of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘under part 
91 of the title 14,’’ and inserting ‘‘under part 91 of title 14,’’. 
(d) PLANS TO ADDRESS NEEDS OF FAMILIES OF PASSENGERS 
INVOLVED
IN
FOREIGN
AIR
CARRIER
ACCIDENTS.—Section 
41313(c)(16) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking 
‘‘An assurance that the foreign air carrier’’ and inserting ‘‘An assur-
ance that’’. 
(e) OPERATIONS OF CARRIERS.—The analysis for chapter 417 
of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 41718 and inserting the following: 
‘‘41718. Special rules for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.’’. 
(f) SCHEDULES FOR CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION OF MAIL.—Sec-
tion 41902(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking 
‘‘section 41906’’ and inserting ‘‘section 41905’’. 
(g) WEIGHING MAIL.—Section 41907 of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ and all that follows through 
‘‘administrative’’ and inserting ‘‘and administrative’’.
H. R. 302—186 
(h) STRUCTURES
INTERFERING
WITH
AIR
COMMERCE
OR 
NATIONAL SECURITY.—Section 44718(b)(1) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking 
‘‘air navigation facilities and equipment’’ and inserting ‘‘air 
or space navigation facilities and equipment’’; and 
(2) in subparagraph (A)— 
(A) in clause (v) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (vii); and 
(C) by inserting after clause (v) the following: 
‘‘(vi) the impact on launch and reentry for launch 
and reentry vehicles arriving or departing from a 
launch site or reentry site licensed by the Secretary 
of Transportation; and’’. 
(i) FLIGHT ATTENDANT CERTIFICATION.—Section 44728 of title 
49, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘chapter’’ and inserting 
‘‘title’’; and 
(2) in subsection (d)(3), by striking ‘‘is’’ and inserting ‘‘be’’. 
(j) FEES INVOLVING AIRCRAFT NOT PROVIDING AIR TRANSPOR-
TATION.—Section 45302 of title 49, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘44703(f)(2)’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘44703(g)(2)’’. 
(k) SCHEDULE OF FEES.—Section 45301(a)(1) of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘United States government’’ 
and inserting ‘‘United States Government’’. 
(l) CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE.—Section 46111(g)(2)(A) of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(18 U.S.C. App.)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘(18 U.S.C. App.))’’. 
(m) CHAPTER 465.—The analysis for chapter 465 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by striking the following item: 
‘‘46503. Repealed.’’. 
(n) ALLOWABLE COST STANDARDS.—Section 47110(b)(2) of title 
49, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘compatability’’ and 
inserting ‘‘compatibility’’; and 
(2) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking ‘‘climactic’’ and 
inserting ‘‘climatic’’. 
(o) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS CON-
CERN.—Section 47113(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘(15 U.S.C. 632(o))’’ and inserting ‘‘(15 U.S.C. 
632(p))’’. 
(p) 
SPECIAL
APPORTIONMENT
CATEGORIES.—Section 
47117(e)(1)(B) is amended by striking ‘‘at least’’ and inserting ‘‘At 
least’’. 
(q) SOLICITATION AND CONSIDERATION OF COMMENTS.—Section 
47171(l) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking 
‘‘4371’’ and inserting ‘‘4321’’. 
(r) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.—Section 48104 is amended 
by striking ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—the’’ and 
inserting ‘‘The’’. 
(s) ADJUSTMENTS
TO
COMPENSATION
FOR
SIGNIFICANTLY 
INCREASED COSTS.—Section 426 of the FAA Modernization and 
Reform Act of 2012 is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a) (49 U.S.C. 41737 note) by striking 
‘‘Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of Transportation’’; and
H. R. 302—187 
(2) in subsection (c) (49 U.S.C. 41731 note) by striking 
‘‘the Secretary may waive’’ and inserting ‘‘the Secretary of 
Transportation may waive’’. 
(t) AIRCRAFT DEPARTURE QUEUE MANAGEMENT PILOT PRO-
GRAM.—Section 507(a) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 
of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44505 note) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
48101(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 48101(a) of title 49, United States 
Code,’’. 
SEC. 540. REPORT ON ILLEGAL CHARTER FLIGHTS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall submit to the appropriate 
committees of Congress an analysis of reports filed during the 
10-year period preceding such date of enactment through the illegal 
charter hotline of the FAA and other sources that includes— 
(1) what followup action the Department of Transportation 
or the Administration takes when a report of illegal charter 
operations is received; 
(2) how the Department of Transportation or the Adminis-
tration decides to allocate resources; 
(3) challenges the Department of Transportation or the 
Administration face in identifying illegal operators; and 
(4) recommendations for improving the efforts of the 
Department of Transportation or the Administration to combat 
illegal charter carrier operations. 
SEC. 541. USE OF NASA’S SUPER GUPPY AIRCRAFT FOR COMMERCIAL 
TRANSPORT. 
Notwithstanding section 40125 of title 49, United States Code, 
the Aero Spacelines Super Guppy Turbine B–377–SGT aircraft, 
serial number 0004, may be used to provide the transport, for 
compensation or hire, of oversized space launch vehicle components 
or oversized spacecraft components while continuing to qualify as 
a public aircraft operation pursuant to section 40102(a)(41)(A) of 
title 49, United States Code, if— 
(1) the aircraft is owned and operated by the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration; 
(2) commercial operation is limited to operations conducted 
wholly in United States airspace; and 
(3) no commercially available domestic air transport alter-
native exists. 
SEC. 542. PROHIBITED AIRSPACE ASSESSMENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination 
with appropriate Federal agencies, shall conduct an assessment 
on the security of United States prohibited airspace designated 
by the Federal Aviation Administration, with a focus on permanent 
prohibited airspace (in this section referred to as ‘‘United States 
prohibited airspace’’). 
(b) MINIMUM COMPONENTS.—The assessment developed under 
subsection (a) shall be unclassified but may contain a classified 
annex. It shall, at a minimum, include— 
(1) a summary of the number and types of violations of 
United States prohibited airspace and historical trends of such 
numbers and types; 
(2) an assessment of the processes used to establish United 
States prohibited airspace;
H. R. 302—188 
(3) an assessment of manned and unmanned aircraft, cur-
rent and future, with the ability to penetrate United States 
prohibited airspace undetected; 
(4) an assessment of the current and future capabilities 
of the United States to mitigate threats to United States prohib-
ited airspace; 
(5) recommendations on how to improve security of United 
States prohibited airspace; and 
(6) a process to modify section 99.7 of title 14, Code of 
Federal Regulations, to expand the Administrator’s authority 
to establish temporary flight restrictions in cooperation with 
State and local law enforcement agencies, or as required for 
purposes of national security, homeland security, or law enforce-
ment support. 
SEC. 543. REPORT ON MULTIAGENCY USE OF AIRSPACE AND ENVIRON-
MENTAL REVIEW. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with 
the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the covered committees 
of Congress a report documenting efforts made toward improving 
processes to resolve persistent challenges for special use airspace 
requests in support of, or associated with, short notice testing 
requirements at Major Range and Test Facility Bases, including 
the establishment of temporary military operations areas used for 
conducting short-term, scheduled exercises. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following elements: 
(1) Analysis of previous efforts to streamline internal proc-
esses associated with the designation of temporary military 
operations areas at Major Range and Test Facility Bases and 
the use of such areas for scheduled exercises. 
(2) Analysis of progress made to ensure consistency of 
environmental review, including impact analysis, associated 
environmental studies, or consultation, while complying with 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 
et seq.) and other environmental requirements. 
(3) Identification of challenges, if any, in complying with 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 
(4) A description of airspace requirements, current test 
and training needs statements completed during the 10-year 
period preceding the report, and future 5-year requirements, 
including all temporary military operating areas, special use 
airspaces, instrument routes, visual routes, and unfulfilled user 
requirements. 
(5) Proposed options and solutions to overcome identified 
challenges, if any, including identifying whether— 
(A) a solution or solutions can be incorporated within 
the existing Federal Aviation Administration and Depart-
ment of Defense Memorandum of Understanding; or 
(B) changes to current law are required. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) COVERED COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term ‘‘cov-
ered committees of Congress’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation and the Committee on Armed Services of 
the Senate; and
H. R. 302—189 
(B) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc-
ture and the Committee on Armed Services of the House 
of Representatives. 
(2) MAJOR
RANGE
AND
TEST
FACILITY
BASE.—The term 
‘‘Major Range and Test Facility Base’’ has the meaning given 
the term in section 196(i) of title 10, United States Code. 
(3) SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE.—The term ‘‘special use airspace’’ 
means certain designations of airspace designated by the Fed-
eral Aviation Administration, as administered by the Secretary 
of Defense. 
SEC. 544. AGENCY PROCUREMENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 
Section 40110(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(5) ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PURCHASE OF FOREIGN MANU-
FACTURED ARTICLES.— 
‘‘(A) REPORT.—(i) Not later than 90 days after the 
end of the fiscal year, the Secretary of Transportation 
shall submit a report to Congress on the dollar amount 
of acquisitions subject to the Buy American Act made by 
the agency from entities that manufacture the articles, 
materials, or supplies outside of the United States in such 
fiscal year. 
‘‘(ii) The report required by clause (i) shall only include 
acquisitions with total value exceeding the micro-purchase 
level. 
‘‘(B) CONTENTS.—The report required by subparagraph 
(A) shall separately indicate— 
‘‘(i) the dollar value of any articles, materials, or 
supplies purchased that were manufactured outside 
of the United States; and 
‘‘(ii) a summary of the total procurement funds 
spent on goods manufactured in the United States 
versus funds spent on goods manufactured outside of 
the United States. 
‘‘(C) AVAILABILITY
OF
REPORT.—The Secretary shall 
make the report under subparagraph (A) publicly available 
on the agency’s website not later than 30 days after submis-
sion to Congress.’’. 
SEC. 545. FAA ORGANIZATIONAL REFORM. 
(a) CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER.—Section 106(s) of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(s) CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 
‘‘(A) APPOINTMENT.—There shall be a Chief Technology 
Officer appointed by the Chief Operating Officer. The Chief 
Technology Officer shall report directly to the Chief Oper-
ating Officer. 
‘‘(B) MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS.—The Chief Technology 
Officer shall have— 
‘‘(i) at least 10 years experience in engineering 
management or another relevant technical manage-
ment field; and 
‘‘(ii) knowledge of or experience in the aviation 
industry. 
‘‘(C) REMOVAL.—The Chief Technology Officer shall 
serve at the pleasure of the Administrator.
H. R. 302—190 
‘‘(D) RESTRICTION.—The Chief Technology Officer may 
not also be the Deputy Administrator. 
‘‘(2) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The responsibilities of the Chief 
Technology Officer shall include— 
‘‘(A) ensuring the proper operation, maintenance, and 
cybersecurity of technology systems relating to the air 
traffic control system across all program offices of the 
Administration; 
‘‘(B) 
coordinating 
the 
implementation, 
operation, 
maintenance, and cybersecurity of technology programs 
relating to the air traffic control system with the aerospace 
industry and other Federal agencies; 
‘‘(C) reviewing and providing advice to the Secretary, 
the Administrator, and the Chief Operating Officer on the 
Administration’s budget, cost-accounting system, and ben-
efit-cost analyses with respect to technology programs 
relating to the air traffic control system; 
‘‘(D) consulting with the Administrator on the Capital 
Investment Plan of the Administration prior to its submis-
sion to Congress; 
‘‘(E) developing an annual air traffic control system 
technology operation and maintenance plan that is con-
sistent with the annual performance targets established 
under paragraph (4); and 
‘‘(F) ensuring that the air traffic control system 
architecture remains, to the maximum extent practicable, 
flexible enough to incorporate future technological advances 
developed and directly procured by aircraft operators. 
‘‘(3) COMPENSATION.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Technology Officer shall 
be paid at an annual rate of basic pay to be determined 
by the Administrator, in consultation with the Chief Oper-
ating Officer. The annual rate may not exceed the annual 
compensation paid under section 102 of title 3. The Chief 
Technology Officer shall be subject to the postemployment 
provisions of section 207 of title 18 as if the position of 
Chief Technology Officer were described in section 
207(c)(2)(A)(i) of that title. 
‘‘(B) BONUS.—In addition to the annual rate of basic 
pay authorized by subparagraph (A), the Chief Technology 
Officer may receive a bonus for any calendar year not 
to exceed 30 percent of the annual rate of basic pay, based 
upon the Administrator’s evaluation of the Chief Tech-
nology Officer’s performance in relation to the performance 
targets established under paragraph (4). 
‘‘(4) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator and the Chief 
Operating Officer, in consultation with the Chief Tech-
nology Officer, shall establish measurable annual perform-
ance targets for the Chief Technology Officer in key oper-
ational areas. 
‘‘(B) REPORT.—The Administrator shall transmit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 
describing the annual performance targets established 
under subparagraph (A).