datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
‘‘(3) the term ‘security breach’ means a com-
promise of the security, confidentiality, or integrity 
of computerized data that there is reason to believe 
has resulted in improper access to sensitive person-
ally identifiable information; and 
‘‘(4) the term ‘improper access’ means access 
without authorization or in excess of authorization.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 47 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘1041. Concealment of security breaches involving personally identifiable infor-
mation.’’. 
(c) OBLIGATION TO REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—A person who owns or pos-
sesses data in electronic form containing a means of 
identification and has knowledge of a major security 
breach of the system containing such data main-
tained by such person, must provide prompt notice 
of such breach to the United States Secret Service 
or Federal Bureau of Investigation. 
(2) PUBLICATION
OF
LIST
OF
NOTIFICA-
TIONS.—The Secret Service and the Federal Bureau 
of Investigation shall annually publish in the Federal 
Register a list of all notifications submitted the pre-
vious calendar year and the identity of each entity 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:42 Jan 10, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H104.IH
H104
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
bringing an action in any court of competent jurisdiction
in the United States, including any Federal or State court,
or from seeking appropriate relief from any agency of the
United States, to resolve any controversy arising under
such contract, license, or other agreement.
(b) PERSON.—For purposes of this section, the term
‘‘person’’ means—
(1) any natural person residing in the United
States; and
(2) any corporation, partnership, or other entity
organized under the laws of the United States.
SEC. 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
The right under section 1 to bring an action in a
court or to seek appropriate relief from an agency of the
United States applies only if the action is commenced, or
petition for relief is filed, within the 2-year period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1048 
To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant 
to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject to the sequester. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 24, 2015 
Mr. RENACCI (for himself and Mr. HIMES) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Budget 
A BILL 
To clarify that funding for the standard setting body des-
ignated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act 
of 1933 is not subject to the sequester. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 
Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer-
gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 
not apply with respect to the funding of the standard set-
ting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Se-
curities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s(b)). 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:35 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1048.IH
H1048
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1049 
To clarify that funding for the Securities Investor Protection Corporation 
is not subject to the sequester. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 24, 2015 
Mr. RENACCI (for himself and Mr. HIMES) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Budget 
A BILL 
To clarify that funding for the Securities Investor Protection 
Corporation is not subject to the sequester. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 
Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer-
gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 
not apply with respect to the funding of the Securities In-
vestor Protection Corporation. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:36 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1049.IH
H1049
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1050 
To clarify that funding for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
is not subject to the sequester. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 24, 2015 
Mr. RENACCI (for himself and Mr. HIMES) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Budget 
A BILL 
To clarify that funding for the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board is not subject to the sequester. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 
Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer-
gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 
not apply with respect to the funding of the Public Com-
pany Accounting Oversight Board. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:36 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1050.IH
H1050
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
be deposited into the special fund of the Treasury estab-
lished under section 1931 of title 28, United States Code.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect
60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
TITLE 
V—FEDERAL 
COURTS
STUDY 
COMMITTEE 
REC-
OMMENDATIONS
SEC. 501. PARTIES’ CONSENT TO BANKRUPTCY JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
Section 157(c)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘(c)(1) A bankruptcy judge may hear a proceeding
that is not a core proceeding but that is otherwise related
to a case under title 11. In such proceeding, the bank-
ruptcy judge shall submit proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law to the district court, and any final order
or judgment shall be entered by the district judge after
considering the bankruptcy judge’s proposed findings and
conclusions and after reviewing de novo those matters to
which any party has timely and specifically objected. A
party shall be deemed to consent to the findings of fact
and conclusions of law submitted by a bankruptcy judge
unless the party files a timely objection. If a timely objec-
tion is not filed, the proposed findings of fact and conclu-
sions of law submitted by the bankruptcy judge shall be-
port meets the requirement of multi-modal transpor-
tation options. 
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION AS A U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER 
PROTECTION PORT OF ENTRY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home-
land Security shall designate John Wayne Airport in Or-
ange County, California, as a U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) port of entry. 
(b) MAINTENANCE OF NUMBERS.—The Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall assign to John Wayne Airport 
an appropriate number of personnel of the Department 
of Homeland Security in order for such airport to function 
as a designated CBP port of entry in accordance with sub-
section (a). 
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2016 and sub-
sequent fiscal years such sums as may be necessary to 
carry out this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:37 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1051.IH
H1051
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
344
(F) four representatives of local businesses
and industries, including at least one represent-
ative of the forest products industry and one
representative of the ocean commercial fishing
industry and/or the recreational fishing industry
based in either Oregon or California;
(G) four representatives of the ranching
and farming community, including representa-
tives of Federal lease-land farmers and ranch-
ers and of private land farmers and ranchers in
the Upper Klamath Basin;
(H) two representatives from State of Or-
egon agencies with authority and responsibility
in the Klamath River Basin, including one from
the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
and one from the Oregon Water Resources De-
partment;
(I) four representatives from the local com-
munity;
(J) one representative each from the fol-
lowing Federal resource management agencies
in the Upper Klamath Basin: Fish and Wildlife
Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of
Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation
ber of outpatient visits through which such
services were provided; and
(C) the extent to which each such facility
relies on contractual arrangements under sec-
tion 1703 or 8153 of title 38, United States
Code, to furnish care to women veterans in fa-
cilities which are not under the jurisdiction of
the Secretary where the provision of such care
is not furnished in a medical emergency.
(3) The steps taken by each such facility to ex-
pand the provision of services at such facility (or
under arrangements with the Department of De-
fense facility) to women veterans.
(4) A description of the personnel of the De-
partment who provided such services to women vet-
erans, including the number of employees (including
both the number of individual employees and the
number of full-time employee equivalents) and the
professional qualifications or specialty training of
such employees and the Department facilities to
which such personnel were assigned.
(5) A description of any actions taken by the
Secretary to ensure the retention of the personnel
described in paragraph (4) and any actions under-
(3) Section 1152 of the Northeast Rail Service Act of
1981 (45 U.S.C. 1105) is amended by striking out sub-
section (b) and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
‘‘(b) APPEAL.—An order or judgment of the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia in any
action referred to in this section shall be reviewable in ac-
cordance with sections 1291, 1292, and 1294 of title 28,
United States Code.’’.
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1)
Section 209 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of
1973 (45 U.S.C. 719) is amended—
(A) in subsection (g) by inserting ‘‘or the Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’’ after
‘‘Supreme Court’’; and
(B) by striking out subsection (h).
(2) Section 305(d)(4) of the Regional Rail Reorganiza-
tion Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 745(d)) is amended by striking
out ‘‘a judge of the United States district court with respect
to such proceedings and such powers shall include those of’’.
(3) Section 1135(a)(8) of the Northeast Rail Service
Act of 1981 (45 U.S.C. 1104(8)) is amended to read as fol-
lows:
‘‘(8) ‘Special court’ means the judicial panel es-
tablished under section 209(b)(1) of the Regional Rail
Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 719(b)(1)) or,
which, or otherwise under the control 
of which such item is transferred; 
‘‘(v) any equipment, materials, or 
software or related technology that signifi-
cantly contributes to the delivery of a nu-
clear weapon or other nuclear explosive de-
vice, with the intention that it will be used 
for such purpose, except where— 
‘‘(I) such item is transported to 
or from the territory of, or otherwise 
under the control of, a Non-Prolifera-
tion Treaty State Party; and 
‘‘(II) such item is intended for 
the delivery system of a nuclear weap-
on or other nuclear explosive device of 
a Nuclear Weapon State Party to the 
Non-Proliferation Treaty; or 
‘‘(vi) any equipment, materials, or 
software or related technology that signifi-
cantly contributes to the design, manufac-
ture, or delivery of a biological or chemical 
weapon, with the intention that it will be 
used for such purpose; 
‘‘(C) transports another person on board a 
ship knowing that the person has committed an 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:25 Mar 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1056.IH
H1056
SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
with respect to any proceedings that arise or continue
after the panel is abolished pursuant to section
209(b)(2) of such Act, the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia.’’.
(4) Section 1152 of the Northeast Rail Service Act of
1981 (45 U.S.C. 1105) is further amended by striking out
subsection (d).
(d) PENDING CASES.—Effective 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, any case pending in the special
court established under section 209(b) of the Regional Rail
Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 719(b)) shall be as-
signed to the United States District Court for the District
of Columbia as though the case had originally been filed
in that court. The amendments made by subsection (b) of
this section shall not apply to any final order or judgment
entered by the special court for which—
(1) a petition for writ of certiorari has been filed
before the date on which the special court is abolished;
or
(2) the time for filing a petition for writ of cer-
tiorari has not expired before that date.
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
sections (b) and (c) of this section shall take effect 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act and, except as
provided in subsection (d), shall apply with respect to pro-
110 
munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 222; 338(i); 
551) are inconsistent with this title, this title con-
trols. 
SEC. 210. RULE FOR TREATMENT OF USERS OF WEBSITES, 
SERVICES, AND APPLICATIONS DIRECTED TO 
CHILDREN OR MINORS. 
An operator of a website, online service, online appli-
cation, or mobile application that is directed to children 
or minors shall treat all users of such website, service, or 
application as children or minors (as the case may be) for 
purposes of this title, except as permitted by the Commis-
sion by a regulation promulgated under this title. 
SEC. 211. EFFECTIVE DATES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsections 
(b) and (c), this title and the amendments made by this 
title shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
(b) AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS.— 
The following shall take effect on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act: 
(1) The amendments made by subsections 
(a)(5) and (b)(3)(A) of section 204. 
(2) Sections 205(b), 206(c), 207(b), and 
208(b). 
(3) Subsections (b) and (c) of section 203. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:23 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1053.IH
H1053
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
111 
(c) DIGITAL MARKETING BILL
OF RIGHTS
FOR 
TEENS.—Section 206, except for subsection (c) of such 
section, shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after 
the promulgation of regulations under such subsection. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:23 Mar 03, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1053.IH
H1053
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(A) in the matter before subparagraph (A), 
by striking ‘‘With respect to sea grant colleges 
and sea grant institutes’’ and inserting ‘‘With 
respect to sea grant colleges, sea grant insti-
tutes, sea grant programs, and sea grant 
projects’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), in the matter be-
fore clause (i), by striking ‘‘funding among sea 
grant colleges and sea grant institutes’’ and in-
serting ‘‘funding among sea grant colleges, sea 
grant institutes, sea grant programs, and sea 
grant projects’’. 
(2) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING 
DISTRIBUTION OF EXCESS AMOUNTS.—Section 212 
(33 U.S.C. 1131) is amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (c); and 
(B) by redesignating subsections (d) and 
(e) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively. 
SEC. 9. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS. 
The National Sea Grant College Program Act (33 
U.S.C. 1121 et seq.) is amended— 
(1) 
in 
section 
204(d)(3)(B) 
(33 
U.S.C. 
1123(d)(3)(B)), by moving clause (vi) two ems to 
the right; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:29 Apr 25, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1900.IH
H1900
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
104TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 3969
To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to extend the interim protec-
tion of the Spanish Peaks planning area in the San Isabel National
Forest, Colorado.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AUGUST 2, 1996
Mr. SKAGGS (for himself, Mr. MCINNIS, and Mrs. SCHROEDER) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to extend
the interim protection of the Spanish Peaks planning
area in the San Isabel National Forest, Colorado.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:
(1) The two volcanic peaks in Huerfano and
Las Animas Counties, Colorado, known as the Span-
ish Peaks or Wayatoya, are easterly extensions of
the Rocky Mountains and served as landmarks to
some of Colorado’s earliest settlers.
‘‘(B) An agreement by the person to whom
such extension is issued to make pro rata pay-
ments to local governments providing services
to persons residing within the boundaries of the
lakeshore in such reasonable amounts and at
such times as may be determined by such local
governments in order to reimburse such local
governments for the costs of providing such
services.
‘‘(4) AMOUNT.—The amount of each payment
to be made by a person under paragraph (3) shall
be such person’s annual pro rata share of an amount
determined according to a formula where the numer-
ator is the value of the property used or occupied by
such person and the denominator is 100. The value
of the property for purposes of this paragraph shall
be the value of the property at the time of its acqui-
sition by the United States, indexed for inflation ac-
cording to the Consumer Price Index, as determined
by the Secretary. Notwithstanding sections 1341
and 3302 of title 31 of the United States Code, such
annual payments shall be retained by the Secretary
and shall be available for use by the Secretary with-
out further appropriation for purposes of mainte-
nance and administration of the national lakeshore.
(2) The portion of the San Isabel National For-
est encompassing the Spanish Peaks is within an
area designated on the National Register of Natural
Landmarks and has outstanding scenic, geological,
and other values.
(3) Public Law 96–560 provided for the man-
agement of the Spanish Peaks as a wilderness study
area so as to maintain the options of Congress re-
garding possible designation of these lands as com-
ponents of the National Wilderness Preservation
System.
(4) Section 10 of the Colorado Wilderness Act
of 1993 (Public Law 103–77) required continued
management of these lands, known as the Spanish
Peaks planning area, as a wilderness study area dur-
ing a three-year period extending through August
13, 1996, and required the submission to Congress
of a report concerning the status of private property
holdings within the planning area.
(5) Since 1993, the United States has acquired,
with the consent of their owners, many of the lands
within the Spanish Peaks planning area that were in
private ownership in 1993.
(6) Acquisition by the United States of some or
all of the rest of such non-Federal lands would be
desirable in order to facilitate management of lands
within the Spanish Peaks planning area as wilder-
ness, but neither such acquisitions nor enactment of
legislation to designate some or all of the planning
area as wilderness is likely to be completed prior to
the end of the period during which the planning area
is required to be managed as a wilderness study
area.
(7) Therefore, continued management of the
Spanish Peaks planning area as a wilderness study
area is desirable in order to retain the options of
Congress concerning possible designation of lands
within the planning area as wilderness.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to require
continued management of the Spanish Peaks planning
area as a wilderness study area until Congress can deter-
mine which if any of the lands within the planning area
are to be designated as wilderness.
SEC. 2. WILDERNESS STUDY EXTENSION, SPANISH PEAKS
PLANNING AREA, COLORADO.
Section 10(d) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993
(Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 765) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘for a period of three years from the date of enact-
ment of this Act,’’ and inserting ‘‘until Congress deter-
mines otherwise,’’.
Æ
I
104TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 396
To require hearing loss testing for all newborns in the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 4, 1995
Mr. WALSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Commerce
A BILL
To require hearing loss testing for all newborns in the United
States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hearing Loss Testing
Act of 1995’’.
SEC. 2. REQUIRING HEARING LOSS TESTING FOR ALL
NEWBORNS IN THE UNITED STATES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and
Human Services shall require that every child born in the
United States receive testing for hearing loss at the time
‘‘(f) AUTHORITY TO LEASE TO FAMILY.—Following
an extension under subsection (e) of a right of use and
occupancy for any property, the Secretary may lease the
property to any member or members of the immediate
family of such owner for a definite or indefinite term, at
the discretion of the Secretary. The Secretary may, after
180 days notice to the lessee, terminate any such lease
when the Secretary determines that the structures on the
property will be removed and the property will be restored
to its natural condition in order to improve the natural
landscape and provide better opportunities for public ac-
cess and enjoyment. Any such lease shall be subject to the
same conditions as referred to in paragraph (3) of sub-
section (e) and lease payments shall be retained by the
Secretary in the same manner as provided in paragraph
(4) of subsection (e).’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
Section 10(c) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘many’’
and inserting ‘‘may’’. Section 11(a)(2) of such Act is
amended by striking ‘‘section 10(b) or (d)’’ and inserting
‘‘section 10’’.
Æ