895 
† HR 5515 PAP
(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations 
of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1721. ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR ADDITIONAL RE-
SOURCES FOR COMMITTEE. 
The President shall— 
(1) determine whether and to what extent the ex-
pansion of the responsibilities of the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States pursuant to 
the amendments made by this title necessitates addi-
tional resources for the Committee and the depart-
ments and agencies represented on the Committee to 
perform their functions under section 721 of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950, as amended by this 
title; and 
(2) if the President determines that additional 
resources are necessary, include in the budget of the 
President for fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year 
thereafter submitted to Congress under section
896 
† HR 5515 PAP
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a request for 
such additional resources. 
SEC. 1722. FUNDING. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(o) FUNDING.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.—There is estab-
lished in the Treasury of the United States a fund, 
to be known as the ‘Committee on Foreign Investment 
in the United States Fund’ (in this subsection re-
ferred to as the ‘Fund’), to be administered by the 
chairperson. 
‘‘(2) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE COM-
MITTEE.—There are authorized to be appropriated to 
the Fund such sums as may be necessary to perform 
the functions of the Committee. 
‘‘(3) FILING FEES.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Committee may as-
sess and collect a fee in an amount determined 
by the Committee in regulations, to the extent 
provided in advance in appropriations Acts, 
without regard to section 9701 of title 31, United 
States Code, and subject to subparagraph (B), 
with respect to each covered transaction for 
which a written notice is submitted to the Com-
897 
† HR 5515 PAP
mittee under subsection (b)(1)(C)(i). The total 
amount of fees collected under this paragraph 
may not exceed the costs of administering this 
section. 
‘‘(B) DETERMINATION
OF
AMOUNT
OF 
FEE.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In determining the 
amount of the fee to be assessed under sub-
paragraph (A) with respect to a covered 
transaction, the Committee shall base the 
amount of the fee on the value of the trans-
action, taking into consideration— 
‘‘(I) the effect of the fee on small 
business concerns (as defined in section 
3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
632)); 
‘‘(II) the expenses of the Com-
mittee associated with conducting ac-
tivities under this section; 
‘‘(III) the effect of the fee on for-
eign investment; and 
‘‘(IV) such other matters as the 
Committee considers appropriate. 
‘‘(ii) PRIORITIZATION FEE.—The Com-
mittee may establish a fee or fee scale to
898 
† HR 5515 PAP
prioritize the timing of the response of the 
Committee to a draft or final written notice 
during the period before the Committee ac-
cepts the final written notice under sub-
section (b)(1)(C)(i), in the event that the 
Committee is unable to respond during the 
time required by subclause (II) of that sub-
section because of an unusually large influx 
of notices, or for other reasons. 
‘‘(iii) UPDATES.—The Committee shall 
periodically reconsider and adjust the 
amount of the fee to be assessed under sub-
paragraph (A) with respect to a covered 
transaction to ensure that the amount of the 
fee does not exceed the costs of admin-
istering this section and otherwise remains 
appropriate. 
‘‘(C) 
DEPOSIT
AND
AVAILABILITY
OF 
FEES.—Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, 
United States Code, fees collected under subpara-
graph (A) shall— 
‘‘(i) be deposited into the Fund solely 
for use in carrying out activities under this 
section;
899 
† HR 5515 PAP
‘‘(ii) to the extent and in the amounts 
provided in advance in appropriations 
Acts, be available to the chairperson; 
‘‘(iii) remain available until expended; 
and 
‘‘(iv) be in addition to any appropria-
tions made available to the members of the 
Committee. 
‘‘(4) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—To the extent pro-
vided in advance in appropriations Acts, the chair-
person may transfer any amounts in the Fund to any 
other department or agency represented on the Com-
mittee for the purpose of addressing emerging needs 
in carrying out activities under this section. Amounts 
so transferred shall be in addition to any other 
amounts available to that department or agency for 
that purpose.’’. 
SEC. 1723. CENTRALIZATION OF CERTAIN COMMITTEE 
FUNCTIONS. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565), as amended by section 1722, is further 
amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(p) CENTRALIZATION OF CERTAIN COMMITTEE FUNC-
TIONS.—
900 
† HR 5515 PAP
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The chairperson, in con-
sultation with the Committee, may centralize certain 
functions of the Committee within the Department of 
the Treasury for the purpose of enhancing interagency 
coordination and collaboration in carrying out the 
functions of the Committee under this section. 
‘‘(2) FUNCTIONS.—Functions that may be cen-
tralized under paragraph (1) include monitoring non- 
notified and non-declared transactions pursuant to 
subsection (b)(1)(H), and other functions as deter-
mined by the chairperson and the Committee. 
‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as limiting the authority of 
any department or agency represented on the Com-
mittee to represent its own interests before the Com-
mittee.’’. 
SEC. 1724. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 
Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4565), as amended by this title, is further amend-
ed— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(D)(iii)(I), by striking 
‘‘subsection (l)(1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 
(l)(3)(A)’’; and
901 
† HR 5515 PAP
(B) in paragraph (2)(B)(i)(I), by striking 
‘‘that threat’’ and inserting ‘‘the risk’’; 
(2) in subsection (d)(4)(A), by striking ‘‘the for-
eign interest exercising control’’ and inserting ‘‘a for-
eign person that would acquire an interest in a 
United States business or its assets as a result of the 
covered transaction’’; and 
(3) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘merger, acqui-
sition, or takeover’’ and inserting ‘‘transaction’’. 
SEC. 1725. REQUIREMENTS TO IDENTIFY AND CONTROL 
THE 
EXPORT 
OF 
EMERGING 
AND 
FOUNDATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES. 
(a) IDENTIFICATION OF TECHNOLOGIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall establish 
and, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, 
the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the 
Secretary of State, and the heads of other Federal 
agencies as appropriate, lead, a regular, ongoing 
interagency 
process 
to 
identify 
emerging 
and 
foundational technologies that— 
(A) are essential to the national security of 
the United States; and 
(B) are not critical technologies described in 
clauses (i) through (v) of section 721(a)(8)(B) of
902 
† HR 5515 PAP
the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended 
by section 1703. 
(2) PROCESS.—The interagency process estab-
lished under subsection (a) shall— 
(A) be informed by multiple sources of in-
formation, including— 
(i) publicly available information; 
(ii) classified information, including 
relevant information provided by the Direc-
tor of National Intelligence; 
(iii) information relating to reviews 
and investigations of transactions by the 
Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
United States under section 721 of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
4565); and 
(iv) information provided by the advi-
sory committees established by the Secretary 
of Commerce to advise the Under Secretary 
of Commerce for Industry and Security on 
controls under the Export Administration 
Regulations, including the Emerging Tech-
nology and Research Advisory Committee; 
(B) take into account—
903 
† HR 5515 PAP
(i) the development of emerging and 
foundational technologies in foreign coun-
tries; 
(ii) the effect export controls imposed 
pursuant to this section may have on the 
development of such technologies in the 
United States; and 
(iii) the effectiveness of export controls 
imposed pursuant to this section on lim-
iting the proliferation of emerging and 
foundational technologies to foreign coun-
tries; and 
(C) include a notice and comment period. 
(b) COMMERCE CONTROLS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 
shall establish appropriate controls under the Export 
Administration Regulations on the export, reexport, 
or in-country transfer of technology identified pursu-
ant to subsection (a), including by prescribing addi-
tional regulations. 
(2) LEVELS OF CONTROL.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Com-
merce may, in coordination with the Secretary 
of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the heads 
of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, specify
904 
† HR 5515 PAP
the level of control to apply under paragraph (1) 
with respect to the export of technology described 
in that paragraph, including a requirement for 
a license or other authorization for the export, 
reexport, or in-country transfer of that tech-
nology. 
(B) 
CONSIDERATIONS.—In 
determining 
under subparagraph (A) the level of control ap-
propriate for technology described in paragraph 
(1), the Secretary of Commerce shall take into 
account— 
(i) lists of countries to which exports 
from the United States are restricted; and 
(ii) the potential end uses and end 
users of the technology. 
(C) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.—At a min-
imum, except as provided by paragraph (4), the 
Secretary of Commerce shall require a license for 
the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1) to or in a 
country subject to an embargo, including an 
arms embargo, imposed by the United States. 
(3) REVIEW OF LICENSE APPLICATIONS.— 
(A) PROCEDURES.—The procedures set forth 
in Executive Order 12981 (50 U.S.C. 4603 note;
905 
† HR 5515 PAP
relating to administration of export controls) or 
a successor order shall apply to the review of an 
application for a license or other authorization 
for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1). 
(B) CONSIDERATION OF INFORMATION RE-
LATING TO NATIONAL SECURITY.—In reviewing 
an application for a license or other authoriza-
tion for the export, reexport, or in-country trans-
fer of technology described in paragraph (1), the 
Secretary of Commerce shall take into account 
information provided by the Director of National 
Intelligence regarding any threat to the national 
security of the United States posed by the pro-
posed export, reexport, or transfer. The Director 
of National Intelligence shall provide such infor-
mation on the request of the Secretary of Com-
merce. 
(C) DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COLLABO-
RATIVE ARRANGEMENTS.—In the case of an ap-
plication for a license or other authorization for 
the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of 
technology described in paragraph (1) submitted 
by or on behalf of a joint venture, joint develop-
ment agreement, or similar collaborative ar-
906 
† HR 5515 PAP
rangement, the Secretary of Commerce may re-
quire the applicant to identify, in addition to 
any foreign person participating in the arrange-
ment, any foreign person with significant owner-
ship interest in a foreign person participating in 
the arrangement. 
(4) EXCEPTIONS.— 
(A) MANDATORY
EXCEPTIONS.—The Sec-
retary of Commerce may not control under this 
subsection the export of any technology— 
(i) described in section 203(b) of the 
International Emergency Economic Powers 
Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)); or 
(ii) if the regulation of the export of 
that technology is prohibited under any 
other provision of law. 
(B) REGULATORY
EXCEPTIONS.—In pre-
scribing regulations under paragraph (1), the 
Secretary of Commerce may include regulatory 
exceptions to the requirements of that paragraph. 
(C) ADDITIONAL
EXCEPTIONS.—The Sec-
retary of Commerce shall not be required to im-
pose under paragraph (1) a requirement for a li-
cense or other authorization with respect to the 
export, reexport, or in-country transfer of tech-
907 
† HR 5515 PAP
nology described in paragraph (1) pursuant to 
any of the following transactions: 
(i) The sale or license of a finished 
item and the provision of associated tech-
nology if the United States person that is a 
party to the transaction generally makes the 
finished item and associated technology 
available to its customers, distributors, or 
resellers. 
(ii) The sale or license to a customer of 
a product and the provision of integration 
services or similar services if the United 
States person that is a party to the trans-
action generally makes such services avail-
able to its customers. 
(iii) The transfer of equipment and the 
provision of associated technology to operate 
the equipment if the transfer could not re-
sult in the foreign person using the equip-
ment to produce critical technologies (as de-
fined in section 721(a) of the Defense Pro-
duction Act of 1950, as amended by section 
1703). 
(iv) The procurement by the United 
States person that is a party to the trans-
908 
† HR 5515 PAP
action of goods or services, including manu-
facturing services, from a foreign person 
that is a party to the transaction, if the for-
eign person has no rights to exploit any 
technology contributed by the United States 
person other than to supply the procured 
goods or services. 
(v) Any contribution and associated 
support by a United States person that is 
a party to the transaction to an industry 
organization related to a standard or speci-
fication, whether in development or de-
clared, including any license of or commit-
ment to license intellectual property in com-
pliance with the rules of any standards or-
ganization (as defined by the Secretary by 
regulation). 
(c) MULTILATERAL CONTROLS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the 
Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal 
agencies, as appropriate, may propose that any tech-
nology identified pursuant to subsection (a) be added 
to the list of technologies controlled by the relevant 
multilateral export control regimes.
909 
† HR 5515 PAP
(2) ITEMS
ON
COMMERCE
CONTROL
LIST
OR 
UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of State 
proposes to a multilateral export control regime 
under paragraph (1) to add a technology identi-
fied pursuant to subsection (a) to the control list 
of that regime and that regime does not add that 
technology to the control list during the 3-year 
period beginning on the date of the proposal, the 
applicable agency head may determine whether 
national security concerns warrant the continu-
ation of unilateral export controls with respect to 
that technology. 
(B) APPLICABLE AGENCY HEAD DEFINED.— 
In this paragraph, the term ‘‘applicable agency 
head’’ means— 
(i) in the case of technology listed on 
the Commerce Control List set forth in Sup-
plement No. 1 to part 774 of the Export Ad-
ministration Regulations, the Secretary of 
Commerce, in consultation with the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Secretary of State; 
and 
(ii) in the case of technology listed on 
the United States Munitions List set forth
910 
† HR 5515 PAP
in part 121 of title 22, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, the Secretary of State, in consulta-
tion with the Secretary of Defense and the 
heads of other Federal agencies, as appro-
priate. 
(d) REPORT TO COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT 
IN THE UNITED STATES.—Not less frequently than every 
180 days, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with 
the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the 
heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall sub-
mit to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 
States a report on the results of actions taken pursuant to 
this section. 
(e) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not less frequently than 
every 180 days, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and 
the heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall 
submit a report on the results of actions taken pursuant 
to this section, including actions taken pursuant to sub-
sections (a), (b), and (c), to— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, 
the Committee on Armed Services, and the Select 
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
911 
† HR 5515 PAP
(2) the Committee on Financial Services, the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 
Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 
(f) MODIFICATIONS TO EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND 
RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 
shall revise the objectives of the Emerging Technology 
and Research Advisory Committee, established by the 
Secretary under the Export Administration Regula-
tions, to include advising the interagency process es-
tablished under subsection (a) with respect to emerg-
ing and foundational technologies. 
(2) DUTIES.—The Secretary— 
(A) shall revise the duties of the Emerging 
Technology and Research Advisory Committee to 
include identifying emerging and foundational 
technologies that may be developed over a period 
of 5 years or 10 years; and 
(B) may revise the duties of the Advisory 
Committee to include identifying trends in— 
(i) the ownership by foreign persons 
and foreign governments of such tech-
nologies;
912 
† HR 5515 PAP
(ii) the types of transactions related to 
such technologies engaged in by foreign per-
sons and foreign governments; 
(iii) the blending of private and gov-
ernment investment in such technologies; 
and 
(iv) efforts to obfuscate ownership of 
such technologies or to otherwise circumvent 
the controls established under this section. 
(3) MEETINGS.— 
(A) FREQUENCY.—The Emerging Tech-
nology and Research Advisory Committee should 
meet not less frequently than every 120 days. 
(B) ATTENDANCE.—A representative from 
each agency participating in the interagency 
process established under subsection (a) should be 
in attendance at each meeting of the Emerging 
Technology and Research Advisory Committee. 
(4) CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Not fewer than 
half of the members of the Emerging Technology and 
Research Advisory Committee should hold sufficient 
security clearances such that classified information, 
including classified information described in clauses 
(ii) and (iii) of subsection (a)(2)(A), from the inter-
agency process established under subsection (a) can be
913 
† HR 5515 PAP
shared with those members to inform the advice pro-
vided by the Advisory Committee. 
(5) APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL ADVISORY COM-
MITTEE ACT.—Subsections (a)(1), (a)(3), and (b) of 
section 10 and sections 11, 13, and 14 of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not 
apply to the Emerging Technology and Research Ad-
visory Committee. 
(6) REPORT.—The Emerging Technology and 
Research Advisory Committee shall include the find-
ings of the Advisory Committee under this subsection 
in the annual report to Congress required by section 
14 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 
U.S.C. 4616) (as continued in effect pursuant to the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)). 
(g) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to alter or limit— 
(1) the authority of the President or the Sec-
retary of State to designate items as defense articles 
and defense services for the purposes of the Arms Ex-
port Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) or to other-
wise regulate such items; or 
(2) the authority of the President under the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.),
914 
† HR 5515 PAP
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 
3201 et seq.), the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 
(42 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.), or the Export Administra-
tion Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (as contin-
ued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) or 
any other provision of law relating to the control of 
exports. 
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) EXPORT
ADMINISTRATION
REGULATIONS.— 
The term ‘‘Export Administration Regulations’’ 
means subchapter C of chapter VII of title 15, Code 
of Federal Regulations. 
(2) IN-COUNTRY TRANSFER.—The term ‘‘in-coun-
try transfer’’ has the meaning given to the term in 
the Export Administration Regulations. 
(3) REEXPORT.—The term ‘‘reexport’’ has the 
meaning given to the term in the Export Administra-
tion Regulations. 
(4) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘‘United 
States person’’ means any person subject to the juris-
diction of the United States. 
SEC. 1726. EXPORT CONTROL ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITIES.—In order to enforce the provisions 
of the Export Administration Regulations under subchapter
915 
† HR 5515 PAP
C of chapter VII of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, 
issued under the authority of the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (pursuant 
to which the President has continued in effect authorities 
granted under the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 
U.S.C. 4601 et seq.)), the President shall delegate to the Sec-
retary of Commerce, in addition to existing authorities, the 
authority to authorize any law enforcement officer of the 
Department of Commerce to conduct investigations (includ-
ing undercover investigations) in the United States and in 
other countries when permitted under such countries’ laws 
using all applicable laws of the United States. 
(b) BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES.—The Secretary of 
Commerce, in consultation with the heads of appropriate 
Federal agencies, may publish and update best practices 
guidelines to assist persons in developing and imple-
menting, on a voluntary basis, effective export control pro-
grams in compliance with the Export Administration Reg-
ulations. 
(c) CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.— 
(1) EXEMPTIONS FROM DISCLOSURE.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—Information obtained 
under the Export Administration Act of 1979 
(50 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) (as continued in effect 
pursuant to the International Emergency Eco-
916 
† HR 5515 PAP
nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) may 
be withheld from disclosure only to the extent 
permitted by statute, except that information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B) shall be withheld 
from public disclosure and shall not be subject to 
disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 5, 
United States Code, unless the release of such in-
formation is determined by the Secretary to be 
in the national interest. 
(B) INFORMATION
DESCRIBED.—Informa-
tion described in this subparagraph is informa-
tion submitted or obtained in connection with an 
application for a license or other authorization 
to export, reexport, or transfer items or engage 
in other activities, a recordkeeping or reporting 
requirement, enforcement activity, or other oper-
ations under the Export Administration Act of 
1979, including— 
(i) the license application, license, or 
other authorization itself; 
(ii) classification or advisory opinion 
requests, and any response to such a re-
quest; 
(iii) license determinations and infor-
mation pertaining to such determinations;
917 
† HR 5515 PAP
(iv) information or evidence obtained 
in the course of any investigation; and 
(v) information obtained or furnished 
in connection with any international agree-
ment, treaty, or other obligation. 
(2) INFORMATION TO CONGRESS AND GAO.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as authorizing the withholding 
of information from Congress or the Comptroller 
General of the United States. 
(B) AVAILABILITY TO CONGRESS.— 
(i) IN
GENERAL.—Information ob-
tained at any time under any provision of 
the Export Administration Act of 1979 or 
the Export Administration Regulations, in-
cluding reports or license applications re-
quired under any such provision, shall be 
made available to a committee or sub-
committee of Congress of appropriate juris-
diction, upon the request of the chairman or 
ranking member of the committee or sub-
committee. 
(ii) PROHIBITION
ON
FURTHER
DIS-
CLOSURE.—No committee or subcommittee 
referred to in clause (i), or member thereof,
918 
† HR 5515 PAP
may disclose any information made avail-
able under clause (i) that is submitted on a 
confidential basis unless the full committee 
determines that the withholding of that in-
formation is contrary to the national inter-
est. 
(C) AVAILABILITY TO GAO.— 
(i) IN
GENERAL.—Information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B)(i) shall be sub-
ject to the limitations contained in section 
716 of title 31, United States Code. 
(ii) PROHIBITION
ON
FURTHER
DIS-
CLOSURE.—An officer or employee of the 
Government Accountability Office may not 
disclose, except to Congress in accordance 
with this paragraph, any information de-
scribed in subparagraph (B)(i) that is sub-
mitted on a confidential basis or from 
which any individual can be identified. 
(3) INFORMATION SHARING.— 
(A) EXCHANGE
OF
INFORMATION.—The 
heads of departments, agencies, and offices with 
enforcement authorities under the Export Ad-
ministration Act of 1979, consistent with protec-
tion of law enforcement and its sources and
919 
† HR 5515 PAP
methods, shall exchange any licensing and en-
forcement information with one another that is 
necessary to facilitate enforcement efforts under 
this section, and shall consult on a regular basis 
with one another and with the heads of other de-
partments, agencies, and offices that obtain in-
formation subject to this paragraph, in order to 
facilitate the exchange of such information. 
(B) PROVISION OF INFORMATION BY FED-
ERAL OFFICIALS.—Any Federal official who ob-
tains information that is relevant to the enforce-
ment of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 
including information pertaining to any inves-
tigation, shall furnish such information to each 
appropriate department, agency, or office with 
enforcement responsibilities under this section to 
the extent consistent with the protection of intel-
ligence, counterintelligence, and law enforcement 
sources, methods, and activities. 
(C) EXCEPTIONS.—The provisions of this 
paragraph shall not apply to information subject 
to the restrictions set forth in section 9 of title 
13, United States Code. Return information, as 
defined in section 6103(b) of the Internal Rev-
920 
† HR 5515 PAP
enue Code of 1986, may be disclosed only as au-
thorized by that section. 
(D) INFORMATION SHARING WITH FEDERAL 
AGENCIES.—Licensing or enforcement informa-
tion obtained under the Export Administration 
Act of 1979 may be shared with heads of depart-
ments, agencies, and offices that do not have en-
forcement authorities under that Act on a case- 
by-case basis, at the discretion of the Secretary 
of Commerce. Such information may be shared 
only when the Secretary makes a determination 
that the sharing of the information is in the na-
tional interest. 
SEC. 1727. PROHIBITION ON MODIFICATION OF CIVIL PEN-
ALTIES UNDER EXPORT CONTROL AND SANC-
TIONS LAWS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, the Executive Office of the President may not 
modify any civil penalty, including a denial order, imple-
mented by the Government of the United States with respect 
to a Chinese telecommunications company pursuant to a 
determination that the company has violated an export con-
trol or sanctions law of the United States until the date 
that is 30 days after the President certifies to the appro-
priate congressional committees that the company—
921 
† HR 5515 PAP
(1) has not, for a period of one year, conducted 
activities in violation of the laws of the United States; 
and 
(2) is fully cooperating with investigations into 
the activities of the company conducted by the Gov-
ernment of the United States, if any. 
(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services and the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives. 
SEC. 1728. UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INDUS-
TRY AND SECURITY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, any reference in the Export Administra-
tion Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) or any other law 
or regulation to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Ex-
port Administration shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Secu-
rity.
922 
† HR 5515 PAP
(b) TITLE 5.—Section 5314 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Under Secretary of Com-
merce for Export Administration’’ and inserting ‘‘Under 
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security’’. 
(c) CONTINUATION IN OFFICE.—The individual serv-
ing as Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Adminis-
tration on the day before the date of the enactment of this 
Act may serve as the Under Secretary of Commerce for In-
dustry and Security on and after that date without the need 
for renomination or reappointment. 
SEC. 1729. LIMITATION ON CANCELLATION OF DESIGNA-
TION OF SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AS 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
EXECUTIVE 
AGENT FOR A CERTAIN DEFENSE PRODUC-
TION ACT PROGRAM. 
(a) LIMITATION
ON CANCELLATION
OF DESIGNA-
TION.—The Secretary of Defense may not implement the de-
cision, issued on July 1, 2017, to cancel the designation, 
under Department of Defense Directive 4400.01E, entitled 
‘‘Defense Production Act Programs’’ and dated October 12, 
2001, of the Secretary of the Air Force as the Department 
of Defense Executive Agent for the program carried out 
under title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) until the date specified in subsection 
(c).
923 
† HR 5515 PAP
(b) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force 
shall continue to serve as the sole and exclusive Department 
of Defense Executive Agent for the program described in 
subsection (a) until the date specified in subsection (c). 
(c) DATE SPECIFIED.—The date specified in this sub-
section is the date of the enactment of a joint resolution 
or an Act approving the implementation of the decision de-
scribed in subsection (a). 
SEC. 1730. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON CERTAIN DEFENSE 
TECHNOLOGIES CRITICAL TO THE UNITED 
STATES MAINTAINING SUPERIOR MILITARY 
CAPABILITIES. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in con-
sultation with the Air Force Research Laboratory, the De-
fense Advanced Projects Research Agency, and such other 
appropriate research entities as the Secretary and the Di-
rector may identify, shall— 
(1) jointly carry out and complete a review of 
key national security technology capability advan-
tages, competitions, and gaps between the United 
States and ‘‘near peer’’ nations; 
(2) develop a definition of ‘‘near peer nation’’ for 
purposes of paragraph (1); and
924 
† HR 5515 PAP
(3) submit to the appropriate congressional com-
mittees a report on the findings of the Secretary and 
the Director with respect to the review conducted 
under paragraph (1). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The review conducted under para-
graph (1) of subsection (a), and the report required by 
paragraph (3) of that subsection, shall identify, at a min-
imum, the following: 
(1) Key United States industries and research 
and development activities expected to be critical to 
maintaining a national security technology capa-
bility if, during the 5-year period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary and 
the Director anticipate that— 
(A) a United States industrial base shortfall 
will exist; and 
(B) United States industry will be unable 
to or otherwise will not provide the needed ca-
pacity in a timely manner without financial as-
sistance from the United States Government 
through existing statutory authorities specifically 
intended for that purpose, including assistance 
provided under title III of the Defense Produc-
tion Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) and 
other appropriate authorities.
925 
† HR 5515 PAP
(2) Key areas in which the United States cur-
rently enjoys a technological advantage. 
(3) Key areas in which the United States no 
longer enjoys a technological advantage. 
(4) Sectors of the defense industrial base in 
which the United States lacks adequate productive ca-
pacity to meet critical national defense needs. 
(5) Priority areas for which appropriate statu-
tory industrial base incentives should be applied as 
the most cost-effective, expedient, and practical alter-
native for meeting the technology or defense industrial 
base needs identified under this subsection, includ-
ing— 
(A) sustainment of critical production and 
supply chain capabilities; 
(B) commercialization of research and de-
velopment investments; 
(C) scaling of emerging technologies; and 
(D) other areas as determined by the Sec-
retary and the Director. 
(6) Priority funding recommendations with re-
spect to key areas that the Secretary, in consultation 
with the Director, determines are— 
(A) critical to the United States maintain-
ing superior military capabilities, especially
926 
† HR 5515 PAP
with respect to potential peer and near peer 
military or economic competitors, during the 5- 
year period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act; and 
(B) suitable for long-term investment from 
funds made available under title III of the De-
fense Production Act of 1950 and other appro-
priate statutory authorities. 
(c) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by sub-
section (a)(3) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
may include a classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Banking, Housing and 
Urban Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and 
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; 
and 
(2) the Committee on Financial Services, the 
Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Rep-
resentatives.
927 
† HR 5515 PAP
SEC. 1731. BRIEFING ON INFORMATION FROM TRANS-
ACTIONS REVIEWED BY COMMITTEE ON FOR-
EIGN INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 
RELATING TO FOREIGN EFFORTS TO INFLU-
ENCE 
DEMOCRATIC 
INSTITUTIONS 
AND 
PROCESSES. 
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or a designee 
of the Secretary) shall provide a briefing to the Committee 
on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and 
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Rep-
resentatives on— 
(1) transactions reviewed by the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States during the 
5-year period preceding the briefing that the Com-
mittee determined would have allowed foreign persons 
to inappropriately influence democratic institutions 
and processes within the United States and in other 
countries; and 
(2) the disposition of such reviews, including 
any steps taken by the Committee to address the risk 
of allowing foreign persons to influence such institu-
tions and processes. 
SEC. 1732. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
(a) IMMEDIATE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVI-
SIONS.—The following shall take effect on the date of the
928 
† HR 5515 PAP
enactment of this Act and apply with respect to any covered 
transaction the review or investigation of which is initiated 
under section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 
on or after such date of enactment: 
(1) Sections 1705, 1707, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1713, 
1714, 1715, 1716, 1717, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 
1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, and 1729 and 
the amendments made by those sections. 
(2) Section 1712 and the amendments made by 
that section (except for clause (iii) of section 
721(b)(4)(A) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, 
as added by section 1712). 
(3) Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)(A)(i), 
(5)(B)(i), (5)(B)(iv)(I), (5)(B)(v), (5)(C)(v), (6), (7), 
(8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), and 
(17) of subsection (a) of section 721 of the Defense 
Production Act of 1950, as amended by section 1703. 
(4) Section 721(m)(4) of the Defense Production 
Act of 1950, as amended by section 1718 (except for 
clauses (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v) of subparagraph (B) 
of that section). 
(b) DELAYED APPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN PROVI-
SIONS.—
929 
† HR 5515 PAP
(1) IN GENERAL.—Any provision of or amend-
ment made by this title not specified in subsection (a) 
shall— 
(A) take effect on the date that is 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register of a de-
termination by the chairperson of the Committee 
on Foreign Investment in the United States that 
the regulations, organizational structure, per-
sonnel, and other resources necessary to admin-
ister the new provisions are in place; and 
(B) apply with respect to any covered 
transaction the review or investigation of which 
is initiated under section 721 of the Defense Pro-
duction Act of 1950 on or after the date de-
scribed in subparagraph (A). 
(2) NONDELEGATION OF DETERMINATION.—The 
determination of the chairperson of the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States under para-
graph (1)(A) may not be delegated. 
(c) AUTHORIZATION FOR PILOT PROGRAMS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and ending on the date de-
scribed in subsection (b)(1)(A), the Committee on For-
eign Investment in the United States may, at its dis-
cretion, conduct one or more pilot programs to imple-
930 
† HR 5515 PAP
ment any authority provided pursuant to any provi-
sion of or amendment made by this title not specified 
in subsection (a). 
(2) PUBLICATION
IN
FEDERAL
REGISTER.—A 
pilot program may not commence until the date that 
is 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 
of a determination by the chairperson of the Com-
mittee of the scope of and procedures for the pilot pro-
gram. That determination may not be delegated. 
SEC. 1733. SEVERABILITY. 
If any provision of this title or an amendment made 
by this title, or the application of such a provision or 
amendment to any person or circumstance, is held to be 
invalid, the application of that provision or amendment to 
other persons or circumstances and the remainder of the 
provisions of this title and the amendments made by this 
title, shall not be affected thereby. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019’’.
932 
† HR 5515 PAP
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2018; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2103(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Anniston Army Depot .......................................
$5,200,000 
California ..................
Fort Irwin ..........................................................
$29,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ........................................................
$77,000,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Gordon .......................................................
$99,000,000 
Hawaii .......................
Wheeler Army Airfield ......................................
$50,000,000 
Indiana ......................
Crane Army Ammunition Activity .................
$16,000,000 
Kentucky ....................
Fort Campbell ....................................................
$50,000,000 
Fort Knox ..........................................................
$26,000,000 
New Jersey .................
Picatinny Arsenal .............................................
$41,000,000 
New Mexico ................
White Sands Missile Range ..............................
$40,000,000
933 
† HR 5515 PAP
Army: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
New York ....................
West Point Military Reservation .....................
$160,000,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg .........................................................
$10,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ...........................................................
$24,000,000 
Fort Hood ..........................................................
$9,600,000 
Virginia .....................
Arlington National Cemetery Southern Ex-
pansion ...........................................................
$30,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany .......................
East Camp Grafenwoehr ................................
$31,000,000 
Honduras ......................
Soto Cano Air Base ........................................
$21,000,000 
Korea .............................
Camp Tango ...................................................
$17,500,000 
Kuwait ..........................
Camp Arifjan ..................................................
$44,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations,
934 
† HR 5515 PAP
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Coun-
try 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Italy ................
Vicenza .......................................
Family Housing 
New Construc-
tion.
$95,134,000 
Korea ..............
Camp Walker .............................
Family Housing 
Replacement 
Construction.
$68,000,000 
Puerto Rico ....
Fort Buchanan ..........................
Family Housing 
Replacement 
Construction.
$26,000,000 
Wisconsin 
Fort McCoy ................................
Family Housing 
New Construc-
tion.
$6,200,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $18,326,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Army as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601.
935 
† HR 5515 PAP
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 Stat. 3670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2020, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/ 
Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California
Military Ocean Ter-
minal, Concord.
Access Control Point ..
$9,900,000 
Japan ........
Kadena Air Base .......
Missile Magazine ........
$10,600,000
936 
† HR 5515 PAP
SEC. 2105. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1145) 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (129 Stat. 1146), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2023, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2024, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2016 Project Authorization 
Virginia ...............................
Arlington Cemetery (DAR) .....................
$60,000,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
937 
† HR 5515 PAP
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Camp Navajo ......................................................
$14,800,000 
California .................
Camp Pendleton .................................................
$199,630,000 
Coronado .............................................................
$77,780,000 
Lemoore ...............................................................
$112,690,000 
Miramar ..............................................................
$31,980,000 
Point Mugu .........................................................
$22,150,000 
San Diego ...........................................................
$156,540,000 
San Nicolas Island .............................................
$31,010,000 
Seal Beach ..........................................................
$139,630,000 
District of Columbia 
Naval Observatory ..............................................
$115,600,000 
Florida ......................
Mayport ...............................................................
$111,460,000 
Naval Air Station Whiting Field .....................
$10,000,000 
Georgia ......................
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany ...............
$31,900,000 
Hawaii ......................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ....................
$45,000,000 
Kaneohe Bay .......................................................
$66,100,000 
Pearl City ...........................................................
$78,320,000 
Maine ........................
Kittery .................................................................
$149,685,000 
Mississippi ................
Naval Construction Battalion Center ...............
$22,300,000 
North Carolina .........
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ..........
$240,830,000 
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$51,300,000 
Pennsylvania ............
Philadelphia ........................................................
$71,050,000 
South Carolina .........
Beaufort ...............................................................
$15,817,000 
Parris Island ......................................................
$35,190,000 
Utah ..........................
Hill Air Force Base ...........................................
$105,520,000 
Virginia ....................
Portsmouth ..........................................................
$26,120,000 
Quantico ..............................................................
$13,100,000 
Washington ...............
Bangor .................................................................
$88,960,000 
Whidbey Island ...................................................
$27,380,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahamas ......................
Andros Island ....................................................
$31,050,000 
Bahrain Island ............
SW Asia .............................................................
$26,340,000 
Cuba .............................
Guantanamo Bay ..............................................
$85,000,000 
Germany ......................
Panzer Kaserne .................................................
$43,950,000 
Guam ............................
Joint Region Marianas .....................................
$279,657,000
940 
† HR 5515 PAP
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................................
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$63,800,000 
Arizona ...................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .......
$15,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .........................
$40,000,000 
Florida ....................................
Eglin Air Force Base .......................
$62,863,000 
MacDill Air Force Base ...................
$3,100,000 
Maryland ................................
Joint Base Andrews ..........................
$50,000,000 
Massachusetts .........................
Hanscom Air Force Base .................
$225,000,000 
Nebraska .................................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$9,500,000 
Nevada ....................................
Creech Air Force Base ......................
$59,000,000 
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$5,900,000 
New Mexico ............................
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$85,000,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$7,000,000 
New York ................................
Rome Lab ..........................................
$14,200,000 
North Dakota ........................
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$66,000,000 
Ohio ........................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ....
$116,100,000 
Oklahoma ...............................
Altus Air Force Base ........................
$12,000,000 
Tinker Air Force Base ......................
$166,000,000 
South Carolina ......................
Shaw Air Force Base ........................
$53,000,000 
Utah ........................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$26,000,000 
Washington .............................
White Bluff ........................................
$14,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
941 
† HR 5515 PAP
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ......................................
Joint Region Marianas ....................
$9,800,000 
Mariana Islands-Tinian .......
Tinian ................................................
$50,700,000 
Qatar ......................................
Al Udeid ............................................
$70,400,000 
United Kingdom ....................
RAF Lakenheath ...............................
$148,467,000 
Worldwide Classified .............
Classified Location ...........................
$18,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and 
construction design activities with respect to the construc-
tion or improvement of family housing units in an amount 
not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the
942 
† HR 5515 PAP
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $75,247,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN PHASED PROJECT AUTHORIZED IN 
FISCAL YEARS 2015, 2016, AND 2017. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law
943 
† HR 5515 PAP
113–291; 128 Stat. 3679) for Royal Air Force Croughton, 
for JIAC Consolidation Phase 1, the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division 
B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1153) for Croughton 
Royal Air Force, for JIAC Consolidation Phase 2, and the 
authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2697) 
for Royal Air Force Croughton, for JIAC Consolidation 
Phase 3, the location shall be United Kingdom, Unspecified. 
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 
114–328; 130 Stat. 2696) for Joint Base San Antonio, 
Texas, for construction of a basic military training recruit 
dormitory, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 
a 26,537 square meter dormitory in the amount of 
$92,300,000. 
SEC. 2307. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
944 
† HR 5515 PAP
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 
115–91; 131 Stat. 1825) for the United States Air Force 
Academy, Colorado, for construction of a cyberworks facil-
ity, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a facility 
of up to 4,462 square meters that includes two real property 
gifts of construction of 929 and 465 square meters if such 
gift is accepted by the Secretary in accordance with section 
2601 of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 2308. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may carry out military construction projects to 
construct— 
(1) a 6,702 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia, in the amount of $43,000,000; 
(2) a 4,833 square meter Cyberspace Test Facil-
ity at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in the amount 
of $38,000,000; and 
(3) a 4,735 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 
in the amount of $30,000,000. 
(b) USE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 
EVALUATION FUNDS.—As provided for in the Defense Lab-
oratory Modernization Pilot Program authorized by section
945 
† HR 5515 PAP
2803 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1169), the 
Secretary may use funds available for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation for the projects described in sub-
section (a). 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .........................
Clear Air Force Station .....................................
$174,000,000 
Fort Greely ..........................................................
$8,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ....................
$14,000,000 
Arkansas .....................
Little Rock Air Force Base ................................
$14,000,000 
California ...................
Camp Pendleton .................................................
$12,596,000 
Coronado .............................................................
$71,088,000 
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ....................
$18,800,000 
Colorado ......................
Fort Carson .........................................................
$24,297,000 
CONUS Classified .....
Classified Location .............................................
$49,222,000 
Kentucky ...................
Fort Campbell .....................................................
$82,298,000 
Maine ..........................
Kittery .................................................................
$11,600,000 
Maryland ....................
Fort Meade ..........................................................
$805,000,000 
Missouri ......................
St. Louis ..............................................................
$447,800,000 
New Jersey ..................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ..................
$10,200,000 
North Carolina .........
Fort Bragg ..........................................................
$32,366,000
946 
† HR 5515 PAP
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
New River ............................................................
$32,580,000 
Oklahoma ....................
McAlester .............................................................
$7,000,000 
Texas ...........................
Joint Base San Antonio ....................................
$10,200,000 
Red River Army Depot ......................................
$71,500,000 
Virginia ......................
Dam Neck ............................................................
$8,959,000 
Fort A.P. Hill .....................................................
$11,734,000 
Fort Belvoir ........................................................
$6,127,000 
Humphreys Engineer Center .............................
$20,257,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ................................
$12,700,000 
Pentagon ..............................................................
$35,850,000 
Washington ...............
Joint Base Lewis-McChord ................................
$26,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium ................
U.S. Army Garrison Benelux (Chievres) ..........
$14,305,000 
Cuba ......................
Guantanamo Bay ...............................................
$9,080,000 
Djibouti .................
Camp Lemonnier ................................................
$3,750,000 
Germany ...............
Baumholder .........................................................
$11,504,000 
Kaiserslautern Air Base .....................................
$99,955,000 
Weisbaden ............................................................
$56,048,000 
Greece ....................
NSA Souda Bay .................................................
$2,230,000 
Guam ...................
Naval Base Guam ...............................................
$4,634,000 
NSA Naples .........................................................
$990,000 
Japan ....................
Camp McTureous ................................................
$94,851,000 
Iwakuni ...............................................................
$33,200,000 
Kadena Air Base ................................................
$21,400,000 
Yokosuka ..............................................................
$170,386,000 
Unspecified World-
wide ...................
Unspecified ..........................................................
$15,693,000
947 
† HR 5515 PAP
SEC. 2402. ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION IN-
VESTMENT PROGRAM. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available 
for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 
outside the United States, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Anniston Army Depot ........................................
$20,000,000 
California ...................
Naval Base Ventura County ..............................
$6,530,000 
Colorado ......................
Schriever Air Force Base ...................................
$4,044,000 
Florida ........................
MacDill Air Force Base .....................................
$3,700,000 
Hawaii ........................
Bellows Air Force Base ......................................
$2,944,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .....................
$4,500,000 
Idaho ...........................
Mountain Home Air Force Base .......................
$5,980,000 
Indiana .......................
NSA Crane ..........................................................
$6,890,000 
Kansas ........................
Salina Training Center .....................................
$3,500,000 
Louisiana ...................
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New 
Orleans ............................................................
$5,340,000 
Maryland ....................
NSA Bethesda .....................................................
$22,000,000 
New Mexico .................
Kirtland Air Force Base ....................................
$462,000 
Ohio .............................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ......................
$7,900,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Fort Indiantown Gap ........................................
$2,150,000 
South Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort .................
$22,402,000 
Texas ...........................
Camp Mabry .......................................................
$5,500,000 
Sheppard Air Force Base ..................................
$9,404,000 
Virginia ......................
Naval Air Station Oceana .................................
$2,520,000 
NRO Headquarters .............................................
$571,000 
Washington ...............
Naval Base Kitsap .............................................
$1,790,000 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction,
948 
† HR 5515 PAP
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of Defense (other than the military depart-
ments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2401 of that Act (128 Stat. 3681), 
and amended by section 2406 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1831), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2019, or the date of the enactment of an 
Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
year 2020, whichever is later.
949 
† HR 5515 PAP
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Japan .................
Commander Fleet Activi-
ties Sasebo ...................
E.J. King High 
School Replace-
ment/Renovation.
$37,681,000 
Okinawa ..........................
Kubasaki High School 
Replacement/Ren-
ovation.
$99,420,000 
New Mexico ........
Cannon Air Force Base ..
SOF Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
(STS).
$23,333,000 
Virginia .............
Pentagon ..........................
Redundant Chilled 
Water Loop.
$15,100,000 
SEC. 2405. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 
PROJECT. 
The table in section 2401(a) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 105–91) is amended by inserting after the item re-
lating to South Carolina the following new item: 
Texas ................................
Fort Bliss Blood Processing 
Center ................................
$8,300,000
950 
† HR 5515 PAP
TITLE XXV—INTERNATIONAL 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization 
Security 
Invest-
ment Program 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construc-
tion previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2018, for contribu-
tions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 
10, United States Code, for the share of the United States 
of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation Security Investment Program authorized by section 
2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
951 
† HR 5515 PAP
Subtitle B—Host Country In-kind 
Contributions 
SEC. 2511. REPUBLIC OF KOREA FUNDED CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS. 
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for 
required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense 
may accept military construction projects for the installa-
tions or locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects 
Country 
Compo-
nent 
Installation 
or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Korea .........
Army .........
Camp Carroll
Upgrade Electrical 
Distribution, Phase 
2 ...............................
$52,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Site Development ........
$7,800,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Air Support Oper-
ations Squadron .....
$25,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Unaccompanied En-
listed Personnel 
Housing, P2 ............
$76,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Hum-
phreys .........
Echelon Above Brigade 
Engineer Battalion, 
VMF .........................
$123,000,000 
Army .........
Camp Walker
Repair/ Replace Sewer 
Piping System ........
$8,000,000 
Navy ..........
Chinhae ..........
Indoor Training Pool
$7,400,000 
Navy ..........
Pohang Air 
Base ............
Replace Ordnance 
Storage Magazines ..
$87,000,000 
Air Force ...
Gimhae Air 
Base ............
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Warehouse .......
$7,600,000 
Air Force ...
Gwangju Air 
Base ............
Airfield Damage Re-
pair Warehouse .......
$7,600,000 
Air Force ...
Kunsan Air 
Base ............
Explosive Ordnance 
Disposal Facility ....
$8,000,000 
Air Force ...
Kunsan Air 
Base ............
Upgrade Flow- 
Through Fuel Sys-
tem ...........................
$23,000,000 
Air Force ...
Osan Air Base 
5th Recon-naissance 
Squadron Aircraft 
Shelter .....................
$12,000,000
996 
† HR 5515 PAP
Secretary of the Army under paragraph 
(1)(B). 
(ii) MAP.—The Secretary shall prepare 
a map and legal description depicting the 
revised boundary of the missile range. 
(C) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section 
2854 of Public Law 104–201 (54 U.S.C. 320301 
note) is repealed. 
(3) ADMINISTRATION.— 
(A) PARK.—The Secretary shall administer 
the land transferred under paragraph (1)(A) in 
accordance with laws (including regulations) ap-
plicable to the Park. 
(B) MISSILE RANGE.—Subject to subpara-
graph (C), the Secretary of the Army shall ad-
minister the land transferred to the Secretary of 
the Army under paragraph (1)(B) as part of the 
missile range. 
(C) INFRASTRUCTURE; RESOURCE MANAGE-
MENT.— 
(i) RANGE ROAD 7.— 
(I) 
INFRASTRUCTURE
MANAGE-
MENT.—To the maximum extent prac-
ticable, in planning, constructing, and 
managing infrastructure on the land
1004 
† HR 5515 PAP
Project 19–D–670, 138kV Power Transmission 
System Replacement, Nevada National Security Site, 
Nevada, $6,000,000. 
Project 19–D–660, Lithium Production Capa-
bility, Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee, $19,000,000. 
Project 19–D–930, KS Overhead Piping, Kessel-
ring Site, West Milton, New York, $10,994,000. 
SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2019 for defense envi-
ronmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as 
specified in the funding table in section 4701. 
SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2019 for other defense 
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4701. 
SEC. 3104. NUCLEAR ENERGY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2019 for nuclear en-
ergy as specified in the funding table in section 4701.