H. R. 5122—44
goals of the military departments and the Defense Agen-
cies; and 
‘‘(2) a report, in both classified and unclassified form, con-
taining an analysis and evaluation of international research 
and technology capabilities, including an identification of any 
technology areas in which the United States may not have 
global technical leadership within the next 10 years, in each 
of the technology areas described in the following plans: 
‘‘(A) The most current Joint Warfighting Science and 
Technology Plan required by section 270 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (10 U.S.C. 
2501 note). 
‘‘(B) The Defense Technology Area Plan of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
‘‘(C) The Basic Research Plan of the Department of 
Defense.’’. 
SEC. 218. HYPERSONICS DEVELOPMENT. 
(a) 
ESTABLISHMENT
OF
JOINT
TECHNOLOGY
OFFICE
ON 
HYPERSONICS.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish within the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense a joint technology office on 
hypersonics. The office shall carry out the program required under 
subsection (b), and shall have such other responsibilities relating 
to hypersonics as the Secretary shall specify. 
(b) PROGRAM
ON HYPERSONICS.—The joint technology office 
established under subsection (a) shall carry out a program for 
the development of hypersonics for defense purposes. 
(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—In carrying out the program required 
by subsection (b), the joint technology office established under sub-
section (a) shall do the following: 
(1) Coordinate and integrate current and future research, 
development, test, and evaluation programs and system dem-
onstration programs of the Department of Defense on 
hypersonics. 
(2) Undertake appropriate actions to ensure—
(A) close and continuous integration of the programs 
on hypersonics of the military departments with the pro-
grams on hypersonics of the Defense Agencies; 
(B) coordination of the programs referred to in subpara-
graph (A) with the programs on hypersonics of the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration; and 
(C) that developmental testing resources are adequate 
and facilities are made available in a timely manner to 
support hypersonics research, demonstration programs, and 
system development. 
(3) Approve demonstration programs on hypersonic sys-
tems. 
(4) Ensure that any demonstration program on hypersonic 
systems that is carried out in any year after its approval 
under paragraph (3) is carried out only if certified under sub-
section (e) as being consistent with the roadmap under sub-
section (d). 
(d) ROADMAP.—
(1) ROADMAP REQUIRED.—The joint technology office estab-
lished under subsection (a) shall develop, and every two years 
revise, a roadmap for the hypersonics programs of the Depart-
ment of Defense.
H. R. 5122—45
(2) COORDINATION.—The roadmap shall be developed and 
revised under paragraph (1) in coordination with the Joint 
Staff and in consultation with the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration. 
(3) ELEMENTS.—The roadmap shall include the following 
matters: 
(A) Anticipated or potential mission requirements for 
hypersonics. 
(B) Short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals for the 
Department of Defense on hypersonics, which shall be con-
sistent with the missions and anticipated requirements 
of the Department over the applicable period. 
(C) A schedule for meeting such goals, including—
(i) the activities and funding anticipated to be 
required for meeting such goals; and 
(ii) the activities of the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration to be leveraged by the Depart-
ment to meet such goals. 
(D) The test and evaluation facilities required to sup-
port the activities identified in subparagraph (C), along 
with the schedule and funding required to upgrade those 
facilities, as necessary. 
(E) Acquisition transition plans for hypersonics. 
(4) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees—
(A) at the same time as the submittal to Congress 
of the budget for fiscal year 2008 (as submitted pursuant 
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), the 
roadmap developed under paragraph (1); and 
(B) at the same time as the submittal to Congress 
of the budget for each even-numbered fiscal year after 
2008, the roadmap revised under paragraph (1). 
(e) ANNUAL REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING.—
(1) ANNUAL
REVIEW.—The joint technology office estab-
lished under subsection (a) shall conduct on an annual basis 
a review of—
(A) the funding available for research, development, 
test, and evaluation and demonstration programs within 
the Department of Defense for hypersonics, in order to 
determine whether or not such funding is consistent with 
the roadmap developed under subsection (d); and 
(B) the hypersonics demonstration programs of the 
Department, in order to determine whether or not such 
programs avoid duplication of effort and support the goals 
of the Department in a manner consistent with the 
roadmap developed under subsection (d). 
(2) CERTIFICATION.—The joint technology office shall, as 
a result of each review under paragraph (1), certify to the 
Secretary whether or not the funding and programs subject 
to such review are consistent with the roadmap developed 
under subsection (d). 
(3) TERMINATION.—The requirements of this subsection 
shall terminate after the submittal to Congress of the budget 
for fiscal year 2012 pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 
States Code. 
(f) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—If, as a result of a review under 
subsection (e), funding or a program on hypersonics is certified
H. R. 5122—46
under that subsection not to be consistent with the roadmap devel-
oped under subsection (d), the Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees, at the same time as the submittal to 
Congress of the budget (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 
of title 31, United States Code), a report on such funding or pro-
gram, as the case may be, describing how such funding or program 
is not consistent with the roadmap, together with a statement 
of the actions to be taken by the Department. 
SEC. 219. REPORT ON PROGRAM FOR REPLACEMENT OF NUCLEAR 
WARHEADS ON CERTAIN TRIDENT SEA-LAUNCHED BAL-
LISTIC MISSILES WITH CONVENTIONAL WARHEADS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than February 1, 2007, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report setting forth a proposal to replace nuclear 
warheads on 24 Trident D–5 sea-launched ballistic missiles with 
conventional kinetic warheads for deployment on submarines that 
carry Trident sea-launched ballistic missiles. The report shall be 
prepared in consultation with the Secretary of State. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the types of scenarios, types of targets, 
and circumstances in which a conventional sea-launched bal-
listic missile might be used. 
(2) A discussion of the weapon systems or weapons, whether 
current or planned, that could be used as an alternative for 
each of the scenarios, target types, and circumstances set forth 
under paragraph (1), and a statement of any reason why each 
such weapon system or weapon is not a suitable alternative 
to a conventional sea-launched ballistic missile. 
(3) A description of the command and control arrangements 
for conventional sea-launched ballistic missiles, including 
launch authority and the use of Permissive Action Links (PALs). 
(4) An assessment of the capabilities of other countries 
to detect and track the launch of a conventional or nuclear 
sea-launched ballistic missile. 
(5) An assessment of the capabilities of other countries 
to discriminate between the launch of a nuclear sea-launched 
ballistic missile and a conventional sea-launched ballistic mis-
sile, other than in a testing scenario. 
(6) An assessment of the notification and other protocols 
that would have to be in place before using any conventional 
sea-launched ballistic missile and a plan for entering into such 
protocols. 
(7) An assessment of the adequacy of the intelligence that 
would be needed to support an attack involving conventional 
sea-launched ballistic missiles. 
(8) A description of the total program cost, including the 
procurement costs of additional D–5 missiles, of the conven-
tional Trident sea-launched ballistic missile program, by fiscal 
year. 
(9) An analysis and assessment of the implications for 
ballistic missile proliferation if the United States decides to 
go forward with the conventional Trident sea-launched ballistic 
missile program or any other conventional long-range ballistic 
missile program.
H. R. 5122—47
(10) An analysis and assessment of the implications for 
the United States missile defense system if other countries 
use conventional long-range ballistic missiles. 
(11) An analysis of any problems created by the ambiguity 
that results from the use of the same ballistic missile for 
both conventional and nuclear warheads. 
(12) An analysis and assessment of the methods that other 
countries might use to resolve the ambiguities associated with 
a nuclear or conventional sea-launched ballistic missile. 
(13) An analysis, by the Secretary of State, of the inter-
national, treaty, and other concerns that would be associated 
with the use of a conventional sea-launched ballistic missile 
and recommendations for measures to mitigate or eliminate 
such concerns. 
(14) A joint statement by the Secretary of Defense and 
the Secretary of State on how to ensure that the use of a 
conventional sea-launched ballistic missile will not result in 
an intentional, inadvertent, mistaken, or accidental reciprocal 
or responsive launch of a nuclear strike by any other country. 
Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 
SEC. 221. FIELDING OF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES. 
Upon approval by the Secretary of Defense, funds authorized 
to be appropriated for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 for research, 
development, test, and evaluation for the Missile Defense Agency 
may be used for the development and fielding of ballistic missile 
defense capabilities. 
SEC. 222. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR SPACE-BASED INTER-
CEPTOR. 
(a) LIMITATION.—No funds appropriated or otherwise made 
available to the Department of Defense may be obligated or 
expended for the testing or deployment of a space-based interceptor 
until 90 days after the date on which a report described in sub-
section (c) is submitted. 
(b) SPACE-BASED INTERCEPTOR DEFINED.—For purposes of this 
section, the term ‘‘space-based interceptor’’ means a kinetic or 
directed energy weapon that is stationed on a satellite or orbiting 
platform and that is intended to destroy another satellite in orbit 
or a ballistic missile launched from earth. 
(c) REPORT.—A report described in this subsection is a report 
prepared by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and sub-
mitted to the congressional defense committees containing the fol-
lowing: 
(1) A description of the essential components of a proposed 
space-based interceptor system, including a description of how 
the system proposed would enhance or complement other mis-
sile defense systems. 
(2) An estimate of the acquisition and life-cycle cost of 
the system described under paragraph (1), including lift cost 
and periodic replacement cost due to depreciation and attrition. 
(3) An analysis of the vulnerability of such a system to 
counter-measures, including direct ascent and co-orbital inter-
ceptors, and an analysis of the functionality of such a system 
in the aftermath of a nuclear detonation in space.
H. R. 5122—48
(4) A projection of the foreign policy and national security 
implications of a space-based interceptor program, including 
the probable response of United States adversaries and United 
States allies. 
SEC. 223. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES ON PRIORITIES IN THE 
DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND FIELDING OF MISSILE 
DEFENSE CAPABILITIES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) In response to the threat posed by ballistic missiles, 
President George W. Bush in December 2002 directed the Sec-
retary of Defense to proceed with the fielding of an initial 
set of missile defense capabilities in 2004 and 2005. 
(2) According to assessments by the intelligence community 
of the United States, North Korea tested in 2005 a new solid 
propellant short-range ballistic missile, conducted a launch of 
a Taepodong-2 ballistic missile/space launch vehicle in 2006, 
and is likely developing intermediate-range and interconti-
nental ballistic missile capabilities that could someday reach 
as far as the United States with a nuclear payload. 
(3) According to assessments by the intelligence community 
of the United States, Iran continued in 2005 to test its medium-
range ballistic missile, and the danger that Iran will acquire 
a nuclear weapon and integrate it with a ballistic missile Iran 
already possesses is a reason for immediate concern. 
(b) POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States that the 
Department of Defense accord a priority within the missile defense 
program to the development, testing, fielding, and improvement 
of effective near-term missile defense capabilities, including the 
ground-based midcourse defense system, the Aegis ballistic missile 
defense system, the Patriot PAC–3 system, the Terminal High 
Altitude Area Defense system, and the sensors necessary to support 
such systems. 
SEC. 224. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESS-
MENTS OF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS. 
Section 232(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2002 (10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘through 2007’’ and 
inserting ‘‘through 2008’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘through 2008’’ and 
inserting ‘‘through 2009’’. 
SEC. 225. SUBMITTAL OF PLANS FOR TEST AND EVALUATION OF THE 
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE 
DEFENSE SYSTEM. 
Section 234(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3174; 10 U.S.C. 
2431 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(3) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Each plan prepared under 
this subsection and approved by the Director of Operational 
Test and Evaluation shall be submitted to the congressional 
defense committees not later than 30 days after the date of 
the approval of such plan by the Director.’’.
H. R. 5122—49
SEC. 226. ANNUAL REPORTS ON TRANSITION OF BALLISTIC MISSILE 
DEFENSE PROGRAMS TO THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2007, and 
annually thereafter through 2013, the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the plans of the 
Department of Defense for the transition of missile defense pro-
grams from the Missile Defense Agency to the military departments. 
(b) SCOPE OF REPORTS.—Each report required by subsection 
(a) shall cover the period covered by the future-years defense pro-
gram that is submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States 
Code, in the year in which such report is submitted. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—Each report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) An identification of—
(A) the missile defense programs planned to be 
transitioned from the Missile Defense Agency to the mili-
tary departments; and 
(B) the missile defense programs, if any, not planned 
for transition to the military departments. 
(2) The schedule for transition of each missile defense 
program planned to be transitioned to a military department, 
and an explanation of such schedule. 
(3) A description of—
(A) the status of the plans of the Missile Defense 
Agency and the military departments for the transition 
of missile defense programs from that agency to the mili-
tary departments; and 
(B) the status of any agreement between the Missile 
Defense Agency and one or more of the military depart-
ments on the transition of any such program from that 
agency to the military departments, including any agree-
ment on the operational test criteria that must be achieved 
before such transition. 
(4) An identification of the entity of the Department of 
Defense (whether the Missile Defense Agency, a military 
department, or both) that will be responsible for funding each 
missile defense program to be transitioned to a military depart-
ment, and at what date. 
(5) A description of the type of funds that will be used 
(whether funds for research, development, test, and evaluation, 
procurement, military construction, or operation and mainte-
nance) for each missile defense program to be transitioned 
to a military department. 
(6) An explanation of the number of systems planned for 
procurement for each missile defense program to be transitioned 
to a military department, and the schedule for procurement 
of each such system. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 231. POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON TEST AND EVALUATION TO 
ADDRESS EMERGING ACQUISITION APPROACHES. 
(a) REVISION TO REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Section 2399(b) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
H. R. 5122—50
‘‘(2) The Director shall analyze the results of the operational 
test and evaluation conducted for each major defense acquisition 
program. At the conclusion of such testing, the Director shall pre-
pare a report stating—
‘‘(A) the opinion of the Director as to—
‘‘(i) whether the test and evaluation performed were 
adequate; and 
‘‘(ii) whether the results of such test and evaluation 
confirm that the items or components actually tested are 
effective and suitable for combat; and 
‘‘(B) additional information on the operational capabilities 
of the items or components that the Director considers appro-
priate based on the testing conducted.’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following: 
‘‘(5) If, before a final decision described in paragraph (4) is 
made for a major defense acquisition program, a decision is made 
within the Department of Defense to proceed to operational use 
of that program or to make procurement funds available for that 
program, the Director shall submit to the Secretary of Defense 
and the congressional defense committees the report with respect 
to that program under paragraph (2) as soon as practicable after 
the decision described in this paragraph is made.’’. 
(b) REVIEW AND REVISION OF POLICIES AND PRACTICES.—
(1) REVIEW.—During fiscal year 2007, the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the 
Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall review 
Department of Defense policies and practices on test and 
evaluation in order to—
(A) reaffirm the test and evaluation principles that 
should guide traditional acquisition programs; and 
(B) determine how best to apply appropriate test and 
evaluation principles to emerging acquisition approaches. 
(2) REVISED GUIDANCE.—If the Under Secretary determines 
as a result of the review under paragraph (1) that a revision 
of the policies and practices referred to in that paragraph 
is necessary, the Under Secretary and the Director shall jointly 
issue new or revised guidance for the Department of Defense 
on test and evaluation to address that determination. 
(c) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—In carrying out subsection (b), 
the Under Secretary shall address policies and practices on test 
and evaluation in order to—
(1) ensure the performance of test and evaluation activities 
with regard to—
(A) items that are acquired pursuant to the authority 
for rapid acquisition and deployment of items in section 
806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note); 
(B) programs that are conducted pursuant to the 
authority for spiral development in section 803 of the Bob 
Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2603; 10 U.S.C. 2430 
note), or other authority for the conduct of incremental 
acquisition programs; 
(C) systems that are acquired pursuant to other 
emerging acquisition approaches, as approved by the Under 
Secretary; and
H. R. 5122—51
(D) equipment that is not subject to the operational 
test and evaluation requirements in sections 2366 and 2399 
of title 10, United States Code, but that may require limited 
operational test and evaluation for the purpose of ensuring 
the safety and survivability of such equipment and per-
sonnel using such equipment; and 
(2) ensure the appropriate use, if any, of operational test 
and evaluation resources to assess technology readiness levels 
for the purpose of section 2366a of title 10, United States 
Code, and other applicable technology readiness requirements. 
(d) INCLUSION OF TESTING NEEDS IN STRATEGIC PLAN.—The 
Director, Test Resource Management Center, shall ensure that the 
strategic plan for Department of Defense test and evaluation 
resources developed pursuant to section 196 of title 10, United 
States Code—
(1) reflects any testing needs of the Department of Defense 
that are identified as a result of activities under subsection 
(b); and 
(2) includes an assessment of the test and evaluation facili-
ties, resources, and budgets that will be required to meet such 
needs. 
(e) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than nine months after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary and 
the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on the review con-
ducted under paragraph (1) of subsection (b), including any new 
or revised guidance issued pursuant to paragraph (2) of that sub-
section. 
(f) CLARIFICATION OF DUTIES WITH RESPECT TO FORCE PROTEC-
TION EQUIPMENT.—Section 139(b) of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (6) as para-
graphs (4) through (7), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: 
‘‘(3) provide guidance to and consult with the officials 
described in paragraph (2) with respect to operational test 
and evaluation or survivability testing (or both) within the 
Department of Defense of force protection equipment (including 
non-lethal weapons), which, in such a case—
‘‘(A) shall be guidance and consultation for the purposes 
of—
‘‘(i) expediting suitable operational test and evalua-
tion; 
‘‘(ii) providing objective subject-matter expertise; 
‘‘(iii) encouraging data sharing between Depart-
ment of Defense components; and 
‘‘(iv) where appropriate, facilitating the use of 
common test standards; and 
‘‘(B) does not authorize the Director—
‘‘(i) to approve test and evaluation plans for such 
equipment; or 
‘‘(ii) to in any manner delay deployment of such 
equipment;’’.
H. R. 5122—52
SEC. 232. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENT FOR GLOBAL RESEARCH 
WATCH PROGRAM. 
Section 2365(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘September 30, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 
2011’’. 
SEC. 233. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON TECHNOLOGY SHARING OF JOINT 
STRIKE FIGHTER TECHNOLOGY. 
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 
share technology with regard to the Joint Strike Fighter between 
the United States Government and the Government of the United 
Kingdom consistent with the national security interests of both 
nations. 
SEC. 234. REPORT ON VEHICLE-BASED ACTIVE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 
FOR CERTAIN BATTLEFIELD THREATS. 
(a) INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
enter into a contract with an appropriate entity independent of 
the United States Government to conduct an assessment of various 
foreign and domestic technological approaches to vehicle-based 
active protection systems for defense against both chemical energy 
and kinetic energy top-attack and direct fire threats, including 
anti-tank missiles and rocket propelled grenades, mortars, and other 
similar battlefield threats. 
(b) REPORT.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The contract required by subsection 
(a) shall require the entity entering into such contract to submit 
to the Secretary of Defense, and to the congressional defense 
committees, not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, a report on the assessment required 
by that subsection. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 
shall include—
(A) a detailed comparative analysis and assessment 
of the technical approaches covered by the assessment 
under subsection (a), including the feasibility, military 
utility, cost, and potential short-term and long-term 
development and deployment schedule of such approaches; 
and 
(B) any other elements specified by the Secretary in 
the contract under subsection (a). 
TITLE III—OPERATION AND 
MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 
Sec. 302. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 303. Other Department of Defense programs. 
Subtitle B—Environmental Provisions 
Sec. 311. Revision of requirement for unexploded ordnance program manager. 
Sec. 312. Funding of cooperative agreements under environmental restoration pro-
gram. 
Sec. 313. Response plan for remediation of unexploded ordnance, discarded military 
munitions, and munitions constituents. 
Sec. 314. Research on effects of ocean disposal of munitions.
H. R. 5122—53
Sec. 315. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in 
connection with Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site, Moses Lake, 
Washington. 
Sec. 316. Transfer of Government-furnished uranium stored at Sequoyah Fuels 
Corporation, Gore, Oklahoma. 
Sec. 317. Extension of authority to grant exemptions to certain requirements. 
Sec. 318. National Academy of Sciences study on human exposure to contaminated 
drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 
Subtitle C—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 321. Limitation on financial management improvement and audit initiatives 
within the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 322. Funds for exhibits for the national museums of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 323. Prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability. 
Sec. 324. Limitation on deployment of Marine Corps Total Force System to Navy. 
Subtitle D—Workplace and Depot Issues 
Sec. 331. Permanent exclusion of certain contract expenditures from percentage 
limitation on the performance of depot-level maintenance. 
Sec. 332. Minimum capital investment for certain depots. 
Sec. 333. Extension of temporary authority for contractor performance of security 
guard functions. 
Subtitle E—Reports 
Sec. 341. Report on Navy Fleet Response Plan. 
Sec. 342. Report on Navy surface ship rotational crew programs. 
Sec. 343. Report on Army live-fire ranges in Hawaii. 
Sec. 344. Comptroller General report on joint standards and protocols for access 
control systems at Department of Defense installations. 
Sec. 345. Comptroller General report on readiness of Army and Marine Corps 
ground forces. 
Sec. 346. Report on Air Force safety requirements for Air Force flight training oper-
ations at Pueblo Memorial Airport, Colorado. 
Sec. 347. Annual report on Personnel Security Investigations for Industry and Na-
tional Industrial Security Program. 
Sec. 348. Five-year extension of annual report on training range sustainment plan 
and training range inventory. 
Sec. 349. Reports on withdrawal or diversion of equipment from reserve units for 
support of reserve units being mobilized and other units. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 351. Department of Defense strategic policy on prepositioning of materiel and 
equipment. 
Sec. 352. Authority to make Department of Defense horses available for adoption. 
Sec. 353. Sale and use of proceeds of recyclable munitions materials. 
Sec. 354. Recovery and transfer to Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice 
and Firearms Safety of certain firearms, ammunition, and parts granted 
to foreign countries. 
Sec. 355. Extension of Department of Defense telecommunications benefit program. 
Sec. 356. Extension of availability of funds for commemoration of success of the 
Armed Forces in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi 
Freedom. 
Sec. 357. Capital security cost sharing. 
Sec. 358. Utilization of fuel cells as back-up power systems in Department of De-
fense operations. 
Sec. 359. Improving Department of Defense support for civil authorities. 
Sec. 360. Energy efficiency in weapons platforms. 
Sec. 361. Prioritization of funds within Navy mission operations, ship maintenance, 
combat support forces, and weapons system support. 
Sec. 362. Provision of adequate storage space to secure personal property outside 
of assigned military family housing unit. 
Sec. 363. Expansion of payment of replacement value of personal property damaged 
during transport at Government expense.
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2007 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and
H. R. 5122—54
agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $24,416,352,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $31,157,639,000. 
(3) For the Marine Corps, $3,863,462,000. 
(4) For the Air Force, $31,081,257,000. 
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $20,093,876,000. 
(6) For the Army Reserve, $2,260,802,000. 
(7) For the Naval Reserve, $1,275,764,000. 
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $211,311,000. 
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $2,698,400,000. 
(10) For the Army National Guard, $4,776,421,000. 
(11) For the Air National Guard, $5,292,517,000. 
(12) For the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed 
Forces, $11,721,000. 
(13) For Environmental Restoration, Army, $413,794,000. 
(14) For Environmental Restoration, Navy, $304,409,000. 
(15) 
For 
Environmental 
Restoration, 
Air 
Force, 
$423,871,000. 
(16) 
For 
Environmental 
Restoration, 
Defense-wide, 
$18,431,000. 
(17) For Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used 
Defense Sites, $282,790,000. 
(18) For Former Soviet Union Threat Reduction programs, 
$372,128,000. 
(19) For Overseas Humanitarian Disaster and Civic Aid, 
$63,204,000. 
SEC. 302. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2007 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Defense Working Capital Funds, $161,998,000. 
(2) For the National Defense Sealift Fund, $1,071,932,000. 
(3) For the Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense Com-
missary, $1,184,000,000. 
(4) For the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving 
Fund, $18,500,000. 
SEC. 303. OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS. 
(a) DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.—Funds are hereby authorized 
to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 
2007 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense 
Health Program, $21,426,621,000, of which—
(1) $20,894,663,000 is for Operation and Maintenance; 
(2) $135,603,000 is for Research, Development, Test, and 
Evaluation; and 
(3) $396,355,000 is for Procurement. 
(b) 
CHEMICAL
AGENTS
AND
MUNITIONS
DESTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE.—(1) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2007 for expenses, 
not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions 
Destruction, Defense, $1,277,304,000, of which—
(A) $1,046,290,000 is for Operation and Maintenance; 
and 
(B) $231,014,000 is for Research, Development, Test, 
and Evaluation.
H. R. 5122—55
(2) Amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph 
(1) are authorized for—
(A) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and 
(B) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 
United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 
Act. 
(c) DRUG
INTERDICTION
AND
COUNTER-DRUG
ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2006 for expenses, 
not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
Drug Activities, Defense-wide, $926,890,000. 
(d) DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.—Funds are hereby author-
ized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal 
year 2006 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office 
of 
the 
Inspector 
General 
of 
the 
Department 
of 
Defense, 
$216,297,000, of which—
(1) $214,897,000 is for Operation and Maintenance; and 
(2) $1,400,000 is for Procurement. 
Subtitle B—Environmental Provisions 
SEC. 311. REVISION OF REQUIREMENT FOR UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE 
PROGRAM MANAGER. 
Section 2701(k) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) by striking ‘‘establish’’ and inserting ‘‘designate’’; 
and 
(B) by inserting ‘‘research,’’ after ‘‘characterization,’’; 
(2) by striking paragraph (2) and redesignating paragraph 
(3) as paragraph (4); and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new para-
graphs: 
‘‘(2) The position of program manager shall be filled by—
‘‘(A) an employee in a position that is equivalent to pay 
grade O–6 or above; or 
‘‘(B) a member of the armed forces who is serving in the 
grade of colonel or, in the case of the Navy, captain, or in 
a higher grade. 
‘‘(3) The program manager shall report to the Deputy Under 
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment.’’. 
SEC. 312. FUNDING OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER ENVIRON-
MENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM. 
Section 2701(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘This two-year 
limitation does not apply to an agreement funded using amounts 
in the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 or the 
Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established 
under sections 2906 and 2906A of the Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).’’.
H. R. 5122—56
SEC. 313. RESPONSE PLAN FOR REMEDIATION OF UNEXPLODED ORD-
NANCE, DISCARDED MILITARY MUNITIONS, AND MUNI-
TIONS CONSTITUENTS. 
(a) PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR REMEDIATION.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall set the following remediation goals with regard to 
unexploded ordnance, discarded military munitions, and munitions 
constituents: 
(1) To complete, by not later than September 30, 2007, 
preliminary assessments of unexploded ordnance, discarded 
military munitions, and munitions constituents at all active 
installations and formerly used defense sites (other than oper-
ational ranges). 
(2) To complete, by not later than September 30, 2010, 
site inspections of unexploded ordnance, discarded military 
munitions, and munitions constituents at all active installations 
and formerly used defense sites (other than operational ranges). 
(3) To achieve, by not later than September 30, 2009, 
a remedy in place or response complete for unexploded ord-
nance, discarded military munitions, and munitions constitu-
ents at all military installations closed or realigned as part 
of a round of defense base closure and realignment occurring 
prior to the 2005 round. 
(4) To achieve, by a date certain established by the Sec-
retary of Defense, a remedy in place or response complete 
for unexploded ordnance, discarded military munitions, and 
munitions constituents at all active installations and formerly 
used defense sites (other than operational ranges) and all mili-
tary installations realigned or closed under the 2005 round 
of defense base closure and realignment. 
(b) RESPONSE PLAN REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2007, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a comprehensive plan for addressing the remedi-
ation of unexploded ordnance, discarded military munitions, 
and munitions constituents at current and former defense sites 
(other than operational ranges). 
(2) CONTENT.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall 
include—
(A) a schedule, including interim goals, for achieving 
the goals described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of sub-
section (a), based upon the Munitions Response Site 
Prioritization Protocol established by the Department of 
Defense; 
(B) such interim goals as the Secretary determines 
feasible for efficiently achieving the goal required under 
paragraph (4) of such subsection; and 
(C) an estimate of the funding required to achieve 
the goals established pursuant to such subsection and the 
interim goals established pursuant to subparagraphs (A) 
and (B). 
(3) UPDATES.—Not later than March 15 of 2008, 2009, 
and 2010, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees an update of the plan required under para-
graph (1). The Secretary may include the update in the report 
on environmental restoration activities that is submitted to 
Congress under section 2706(a) of title 10, United States Code, 
in the year in which that update is required and may include
H. R. 5122—57
in the update any adjustment to the remediation goals estab-
lished under subsection (a) that the Secretary determines nec-
essary to respond to unforeseen circumstances. 
(c) REPORT ON REUSE STANDARDS AND PRINCIPLES.—Not later 
than March 1, 2007, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on the status of 
the efforts of the Department of Defense to achieve agreement 
with relevant regulatory agencies on appropriate reuse standards 
or principles, including—
(1) a description of any standards or principles that have 
been agreed upon; and 
(2) a discussion of any issues that remain in disagreement, 
including the impact that any such disagreement is likely to 
have on the ability of the Department of Defense to carry 
out the response plan required by subsection (b). 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The terms ‘‘unexploded ordnance’’ and ‘‘operational 
range’’ have the meanings given such terms in section 101(e) 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(2) The terms ‘‘discarded military munitions’’, ‘‘munitions 
constituents’’, and ‘‘defense site’’ have the meanings given such 
terms in section 2710(e) of such title. 
(e) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 313 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 
Stat. 1051; 10 U.S.C. 2706 note) is repealed. 
SEC. 314. RESEARCH ON EFFECTS OF OCEAN DISPOSAL OF MUNITIONS. 
(a) IDENTIFICATION OF DISPOSAL SITES.—
(1) HISTORICAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
conduct a historical review of available records to determine 
the number, size, and probable locations of sites where the 
Armed Forces disposed of military munitions in coastal waters. 
The historical review shall, to the extent possible, identify 
the types of munitions at individual sites. 
(2) COOPERATION.—The Secretary shall request the assist-
ance of the Coast Guard, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, and other relevant Federal agencies in con-
ducting the review required by this subsection. 
(3) INTERIM REPORTS.—The Secretary shall periodically, but 
no less often than annually, release any new information 
obtained during the historical review conducted under para-
graph (1). The Secretary may withhold from public release 
the exact nature and locations of munitions the potential 
unauthorized retrieval of which could pose a significant threat 
to the national defense or public safety. 
(4) INCLUSION
OF
INFORMATION
IN
ANNUAL
REPORT
ON 
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary shall 
include the information obtained pursuant to the review con-
ducted under paragraph (1) in the annual report on environ-
mental restoration activities submitted to Congress under sec-
tion 2706 of title 10, United States Code. 
(5) FINAL REPORT.—The Secretary shall complete the histor-
ical review required under paragraph (1) and submit a final 
report on the findings of such review in the annual report 
on environmental restoration activities submitted to Congress 
for fiscal year 2009. 
(b) IDENTIFICATION OF NAVIGATIONAL AND SAFETY HAZARDS.—
H. R. 5122—58
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall provide available information to the Secretary of Com-
merce to assist the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis-
tration in preparing nautical charts and other navigational 
materials for coastal waters that identify known or potential 
hazards posed by disposed military munitions to private activi-
ties, including commercial shipping and fishing operations. 
(2) CONTINUATION OF INFORMATION ACTIVITIES.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall continue activities to inform potentially 
affected users of the ocean environment, particularly fishing 
operations, of the possible hazards from contact with disposed 
military munitions and the proper methods to mitigate such 
hazards. 
(c) RESEARCH.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall continue 
to conduct research on the effects on the ocean environment 
and those who use it of military munitions disposed of in 
coastal waters. 
(2) SCOPE.—Research under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) the sampling and analysis of ocean waters and 
sea beds at or adjacent to military munitions disposal 
sites selected pursuant to paragraph (3) to determine 
whether the disposed military munitions have caused or 
are causing contamination of such waters or sea beds; 
(B) investigation into the long-term effects of seawater 
exposure on disposed military munitions, particularly 
effects on chemical munitions; 
(C) investigation into the impacts any such contamina-
tion may have on the ocean environment and those who 
use it, including public health risks; 
(D) investigation into the feasibility of removing or 
otherwise remediating the military munitions; and 
(E) the development of effective safety measures for 
dealing with such military munitions. 
(3) RESEARCH
CRITERIA.—In conducting the research 
required by this subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that 
the sampling, analysis, and investigations are conducted at 
representative sites, taking into account factors such as depth, 
water temperature, nature of the military munitions present, 
and relative proximity to onshore populations. In conducting 
such research, the Secretary shall select at least two representa-
tive sites each in the areas of the Atlantic coast, the Pacific 
coast (including Alaska), and the Hawaiian Islands. 
(4) AUTHORITY TO MAKE GRANTS AND ENTER INTO COOPERA-
TIVE
AGREEMENTS.—In conducting research under this sub-
section, the Secretary may make grants to, and enter into 
cooperative agreements with, qualified research entities. 
(d) MONITORING.—If the historical review required by sub-
section (a) or the research required by subsection (c) indicates 
that contamination is being released into the ocean waters from 
disposed military munitions at a particular site or that the site 
poses a significant public health or safety risk, the Secretary of 
Defense shall institute appropriate monitoring mechanisms at that 
site and report to the congressional defense committees on any 
additional measures that may be necessary to address the release 
or risk, as applicable. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
H. R. 5122—59
(1) The term ‘‘coastal waters’’ means that part of the ocean 
extending from the coast line of the United States to the outer 
boundary of the outer Continental Shelf. 
(2) The term ‘‘coast line’’ has the meaning given that term 
in section 2(c) of the Submerged Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1301(c)). 
(3) The term ‘‘military munitions’’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 101(e) of title 10, United States Code. 
(4) The term ‘‘outer Continental Shelf’’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf 
Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)). 
SEC. 
315. 
REIMBURSEMENT 
OF 
ENVIRONMENTAL 
PROTECTION 
AGENCY FOR CERTAIN COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH 
MOSES LAKE WELLFIELD SUPERFUND SITE, MOSES LAKE, 
WASHINGTON. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO REIMBURSE.—
(1) TRANSFER
AMOUNT.—Using funds described in sub-
section (b), the Secretary of Defense may transfer not more 
than $111,114.03 to the Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site 
10–6J Special Account. 
(2) PURPOSE
OF
REIMBURSEMENT.—The payment under 
paragraph (1) is to reimburse the Environmental Protection 
Agency for its costs incurred in overseeing a remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study performed by the Department of the Army 
under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program at the 
former Larson Air Force Base, Moses Lake Superfund Site, 
Moses Lake, Washington. 
(3) 
INTERAGENCY
AGREEMENT.—The 
reimbursement 
described in paragraph (2) is provided for in the interagency 
agreement entered into by the Department of the Army and 
the Environmental Protection Agency for the Moses Lake 
Wellfield Superfund Site in March 1999. 
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Any payment under subsection (a) shall 
be made using funds authorized to be appropriated by section 
301(17) for operation and maintenance for Environmental Restora-
tion, Formerly Used Defense Sites. 
(c) USE OF FUNDS.—The Environmental Protection Agency shall 
use the amount transferred under subsection (a) to pay costs 
incurred by the Agency at the Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund 
Site. 
SEC. 316. TRANSFER OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED URANIUM STORED 
AT SEQUOYAH FUELS CORPORATION, GORE, OKLAHOMA. 
(a) TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL.—Subject to subsection (c), the 
Secretary of the Army shall transport to an authorized disposal 
facility for appropriate disposal all of the Government-furnished 
uranium in the chemical and physical form in which it is stored 
at the Sequoyah Fuels Corporation site in Gore, Oklahoma. 
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Funds authorized to be appropriated 
pursuant to section 301(1) for operation and maintenance for the 
Army may be used for the transport and disposal required under 
subsection (a). 
(c) LIABILITY.—The Secretary may only transport uranium 
under subsection (a) after receiving from Sequoyah Fuels Corpora-
tion a written agreement satisfactory to the Secretary that provides 
that—
H. R. 5122—60
(1) the United States assumes no liability, legal or other-
wise, of Sequoyah Fuels Corporation by transporting the ura-
nium; and 
(2) the Sequoyah Fuels Corporation waives any and all 
claims it may have against the United States related to the 
transported uranium. 
(d) COMPLETION OF TRANSPORT.—The Secretary shall complete 
the transport of uranium under subsection (a) not later than March 
31, 2007. 
SEC. 317. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO GRANT EXEMPTIONS TO CER-
TAIN REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) AMENDMENT TO TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT.—Section 
6(e)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2605(e)(3)) 
is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘subparagraphs (B) 
and (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D)’’; 
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘but not more than 
one year from the date it is granted’’ and inserting ‘‘but not 
more than 1 year from the date it is granted, except as provided 
in subparagraph (D)’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(D) The Administrator may extend an exemption granted 
pursuant to subparagraph (B) that has not yet expired for a period 
not to exceed 60 days for the purpose of authorizing the Secretary 
of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments to pro-
vide for the transportation into the customs territory of the United 
States of polychlorinated biphenyls generated by or under the con-
trol of the Department of Defense for purposes of their disposal, 
treatment, or storage in the customs territory of the United States 
if those polychlorinated biphenyls are already in transit from their 
storage locations but the Administrator determines, in the sole 
discretion of the Administrator, they would not otherwise arrive 
in the customs territory of the United States within the period 
of the original exemption. The Administrator shall promptly publish 
notice of such extension in the Federal Register.’’. 
(b) SUNSET DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 
shall cease to have effect on September 30, 2012. The termination 
of the authority to grant exemptions pursuant to such amendments 
shall not effect the validity of any exemption granted prior to 
such date. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report 
on the status of foreign-manufactured polychlorinated biphenyls 
under the control of the Department of Defense outside the United 
States. The report shall address, at a minimum—
(1) the remaining volume of such foreign-manufactured 
polychlorinated biphenyls that may require transportation into 
the customs territory of the United States for disposal, treat-
ment, or storage; and 
(2) the efforts that have been made by the Department 
of Defense and other Federal agencies to reduce such volume 
by—
H. R. 5122—61
(A) reducing the volume of foreign-manufactured poly-
chlorinated biphenyls under the control of the Department 
of Defense outside the United States; or 
(B) developing alternative options for the disposal, 
treatment, or storage of such foreign-manufactured poly-
chlorinated biphenyls. 
SEC. 318. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES STUDY ON HUMAN EXPO-
SURE TO CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER AT CAMP 
LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall 
enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences 
to conduct a comprehensive review and evaluation of the avail-
able scientific and medical evidence regarding associations 
between pre-natal, child, and adult exposure to drinking water 
contaminated 
with 
trichloroethylene 
(TCE) 
and 
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, 
as well as other pre-natal, child, and adult exposures to levels 
of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene similar to those 
experienced at Camp Lejeune, and birth defects or diseases 
and any other adverse health effects. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—In conducting the review and evaluation, 
the Academy shall review and summarize the scientific and 
medical evidence and assess the strength of that evidence in 
establishing a link or association between exposure to trichloro-
ethylene and tetrachloroethylene and each birth defect or dis-
ease suspected to be associated with such exposure. For each 
birth defect or disease reviewed, the Academy shall determine, 
to the extent practicable with available scientific and medical 
data, whether—
(A) a statistical association with such contaminant 
exposures exists; and 
(B) there exist plausible biological mechanisms or other 
evidence of a causal relationship between contaminant 
exposures and the birth defect or disease. 
(3) SCOPE
OF
REVIEW.—In conducting the review and 
evaluation, the Academy shall include a review and evaluation 
of—
(A) the toxicologic and epidemiologic literature on 
adverse 
health 
effects 
of 
trichloroethylene 
and 
tetrachloroethylene, including epidemiologic and risk 
assessment reports from government agencies; 
(B) recent literature reviews by the National Research 
Council, Institute of Medicine, and other groups; 
(C) the completed and on-going Agency for Toxic Sub-
stances Disease Registry (ATSDR) studies on potential tri-
chloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene exposure at Camp 
Lejeune; and 
(D) published meta-analyses. 
(4) PEER
REVIEW.—The Academy shall obtain the peer 
review of the report prepared as a result of the review and 
evaluation under applicable Academy procedures. 
(5) SUBMITTAL.—The Academy shall submit the report pre-
pared as a result of the review and evaluation to the Secretary 
and Congress not later than 18 months after entering into
H. R. 5122—62
the agreement for the review and evaluation under paragraph 
(1). 
(b) NOTICE ON EXPOSURE.—
(1) NOTICE
REQUIRED.—Upon completion of the current 
epidemiological study by the Agency for Toxic Substances Dis-
ease Registry, known as the Exposure to Volatile Organic Com-
pounds in Drinking Water and Specific Birth Defects and Child-
hood Cancers, United States Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, 
North Carolina, the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall 
take appropriate actions, including the use of national media 
such as newspapers, television, and the Internet, to notify 
former Camp Lejeune residents and employees who may have 
been exposed to drinking water impacted by trichloroethylene 
and tetrachloroethylene of the results of the study. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The information provided by the Com-
mandant of the Marine Corps under paragraph (1) shall be 
prepared in conjunction with the Agency for Toxic Substances 
Disease Registry and shall include a description of sources 
of additional information relating to such exposure, including, 
but not be limited to, the following: 
(A) A description of the events resulting in exposure 
to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune. 
(B) A description of the duration and extent of the 
contamination of drinking water at Camp Lejeune. 
(C) The known and suspected health effects of exposure 
to the drinking water impacted by trichloroethylene and 
tetrachloroethylene at Camp Lejeune. 
Subtitle C—Program Requirements, 
Restrictions, and Limitations 
SEC. 321. LIMITATION ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT 
AND AUDIT INITIATIVES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE. 
(a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not obligate 
or expend any funds for the purpose of any financial management 
improvement activity relating to the preparation, processing, or 
auditing of financial statements until the Secretary submits to 
the congressional defense committees a written determination that 
each activity proposed to be funded is—
(1) consistent with the financial management improvement 
plan of the Department of Defense required by section 376(a)(1) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 
(Public Law 190–163; 119 Stat. 3213); and 
(2) likely to improve internal controls or otherwise result 
in sustained improvements in the ability of the Department 
to produce timely, reliable, and complete financial management 
information. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply 
to an activity directed exclusively at assessing the adequacy of 
internal controls and remediating any inadequacy identified pursu-
ant to such assessment.
H. R. 5122—63
SEC. 322. FUNDS FOR EXHIBITS FOR THE NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF 
THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY.—Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301(1) for oper-
ation and maintenance for the Army, not less than $3,000,000 
may be available to the Secretary of the Army for the acquisition, 
installation, and maintenance of exhibits at the facility designated 
by the Secretary as the National Museum of the United States 
Army. The Secretary may enter into a contract with the Army 
Historical Foundation for the purpose of performing such acquisi-
tion, installation, and maintenance. 
(b) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY.—Of the 
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301(2) for oper-
ation and maintenance for the Navy, not less than $3,000,000 
may be available to the Secretary of the Navy for the acquisition, 
installation, and maintenance of exhibits at the facility designated 
by the Secretary as the National Museum of the United States 
Navy. The Secretary may enter into a contract with the Naval 
Historical Foundation for the purpose of performing such acquisi-
tion, installation, and maintenance. 
(c) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE MARINE CORPS AND HERITAGE 
CENTER.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 
301(3) for operation and maintenance for the Marine Corps, not 
less than $3,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of the 
Navy for the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of exhibits 
at the National Museum of the Marine Corps and Heritage Center. 
The Secretary may enter into a contract with the United States 
Marine Corps Heritage Foundation for the purpose of performing 
such acquisition, installation, and maintenance. 
(d) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.—
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301(4) 
for operation and maintenance for the Air Force, not less than 
$3,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of the Air Force 
for the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of exhibits at 
the facility designated by the Secretary as the National Museum 
of the United States Air Force. The Secretary may enter into 
a contract with the Air Force Museum Foundation for the purpose 
of performing such acquisition, installation, and maintenance. 
(e) REIMBURSEMENT.—
(1) AUTHORITY
TO
ACCEPT
REIMBURSEMENT.—After Sep-
tember 30, 2006, the Secretary of a military department may 
accept funds from any non-profit entity authorized to support 
the national museum of the applicable Armed Force to 
reimburse the Secretary for amounts obligated and expended 
by the Secretary from amounts made available to the Secretary 
under this section. 
(2) TREATMENT.—Amounts accepted as reimbursement 
under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the account that was 
used to cover the costs for which the reimbursement was pro-
vided. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts 
in that account, and shall be available for the same purposes, 
and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as other 
amounts in that account.
H. R. 5122—64
SEC. 323. PRIORITIZATION OF FUNDS FOR EQUIPMENT READINESS 
AND STRATEGIC CAPABILITY. 
(a) PRIORITIZATION OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
take such steps as may be necessary through the planning, program-
ming, budgeting, and execution systems of the Department of 
Defense to ensure that financial resources are provided for each 
fiscal year as necessary to enable—
(1) the Secretary of each military department to meet the 
requirements of that military department for that fiscal year 
for the repair, recapitalization, and replacement of equipment 
used in the global war on terrorism; and 
(2) the Secretary of the Army to meet the requirements 
of the Army for that fiscal year, in addition to the requirements 
under paragraph (1), for—
(A) the fulfillment of the equipment requirements of 
units transforming to modularity in accordance with the 
Modular Force Initiative report submitted to Congress in 
March 2006; and 
(B) the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in 
prepositioned stocks in accordance with requirements 
under the Army Prepositioned Stocks Strategy 2012 or 
a subsequent strategy implemented under the guidelines 
in section 2229 of title 10, United States Code. 
(b) SUBMISSION OF BUDGET INFORMATION.—
(1) SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION.—As part of the budget 
justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the 
President’s budget for a fiscal year or a request for supple-
mental appropriations, the Secretary of Defense shall include 
the following: 
(A) The information described in paragraph (2) for 
the fiscal year for which the budget justification materials 
are submitted, the fiscal year during which the materials 
are submitted, and the preceding fiscal year. 
(B) The information described in paragraph (2) for 
each of the fiscal years covered by the future-years defense 
program for the fiscal year in which the report is submitted 
based on estimates of any amounts required to meet each 
of the requirements under subsection (a) that are not met 
for that fiscal year and are deferred to the future-years 
defense program. 
(C) A consolidated budget justification summary of the 
information submitted under subparagraphs (A) and (B). 
(2) INFORMATION DESCRIBED.—The information described 
in this paragraph is information that clearly and separately 
identifies, by appropriations account, budget activity, activity 
group, sub-activity group, and program element or line item, 
the amounts requested for the programs, projects, and activities 
of—
(A) each of the military departments for the repair, 
recapitalization, or replacement of equipment used in the 
global war on terrorism; and 
(B) the Army for—
(i) the fulfillment of the equipment requirements 
of units transforming to modularity; and 
(ii) the reconstitution of equipment and materiel 
in prepositioned stocks.
H. R. 5122—65
(3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN FIRST REPORT.—As part 
of the budget justification materials submitted to Congress 
in support of the President’s budget for fiscal year 2008, the 
Secretary of Defense shall also include the information 
described in paragraph (2) for fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 
2005. 
(c) ANNUAL REPORT ON ARMY PROGRESS.—On the date on which 
the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year 
under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary 
of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report setting forth the progress of the Army in meeting the 
requirements of subsection (a). Any information required to be 
included in the report concerning funding priorities under para-
graph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) shall be itemized by active duty 
component and reserve component. Each such report shall include 
the following: 
(1) A complete itemization of the requirements for the 
funding priorities in subsection (a), including an itemization 
for all types of modular brigades and an itemization for the 
replacement of equipment withdrawn or diverted from the 
reserve component for use in the global war on terrorism. 
(2) A list of any shortfalls that exist between available 
funding, equipment, supplies, and industrial capacity and 
required funding, equipment, supplies, and industrial capacity 
in accordance with the funding priorities in subsection (a). 
(3) A list of the requirements for the funding priorities 
in subsection (a) that the Army has included in the budget 
for that fiscal year, including a detailed listing of the type, 
quantity, and cost of the equipment the Army plans to repair, 
recapitalize, or procure, set forth by appropriations account 
and Army component. 
(4) An assessment of the progress made during that fiscal 
year toward meeting the overall requirements of the funding 
priorities in subsection (a). 
(5) A schedule for meeting the requirements of subsection 
(a). 
(6) A description of how the Army defines costs associated 
with modularity versus the costs associated with modernizing 
equipment platforms and the reset (repair, recapitalization, 
or replacement) of equipment used during the global war on 
terrorism, including the funding expended on, and the future 
funding required for, such reset requirements. 
(7) A complete itemization of the amount of funds expended 
to date on the modular brigades. 
(8) The results of Army assessments of modular force 
capabilities, including lessons learned from existing modular 
units and any modifications that have been made to modularity. 
(9) The comments of the Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau and the Chief of the Army Reserve on each of the 
items described in paragraphs (1) through (8). 
(d) ANNUAL
COMPTROLLER
GENERAL
REPORT
ON
ARMY 
PROGRESS.—Not later than 45 days after the date on which the 
President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under 
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Comptroller Gen-
eral shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
containing the assessment of the Comptroller General on the fol-
lowing:
H. R. 5122—66
(1) The progress of the Army in meeting the requirements 
of subsection (a), including progress in equipping and manning 
modular units in the regular components and reserve compo-
nents of the Armed Forces. 
(2) The use of funds by the Army for meeting the require-
ments of subsection (a). 
(3) The progress of the Army in conducting further testing 
and evaluations of designs under the modularity initiative. 
(e) TERMINATION OF REPORT REQUIREMENTS.—The requirement 
for the submission of a report under subsection (c) or (d) shall 
terminate on the date of the submission of the report required 
to be submitted under that subsection to accompany or follow the 
President’s budget submission for fiscal year 2012. 
SEC. 324. LIMITATION ON DEPLOYMENT OF MARINE CORPS TOTAL 
FORCE SYSTEM TO NAVY. 
(a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Navy may not deploy 
the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) (or any derivative 
system of the MCTFS) to the Navy until the date on which the 
congressional defense committees and the Secretary of the Navy 
receive the written determination of the Chairman of the Defense 
Business Systems Management Committee submitted under sub-
section (d) that the deployment of the MCTFS to the Navy is 
in the best interests of the Department of Defense. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees and the Comptroller 
General a report on the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS). 
The report shall include the following: 
(1) An analysis of alternatives to the MCTFS, including 
a detailed comparison between the cost of deploying and oper-
ating the MCTFS within the Navy and the cost of including 
the Navy in the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources 
System. 
(2) A business case analysis, including an analysis of the 
costs and benefits to both the Department of the Navy and 
the Department of Defense of the alternatives to the MCTFS 
considered under the analysis required by paragraph (1). 
(3) An analysis of the compatibility of the MCTFS with 
the enterprise architecture of the Department of Defense, 
including a detailed estimate of all interface costs with current 
or planned Department-wide military manpower, personnel, 
and pay information technology systems. 
(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 90 
days after the date on which the Comptroller General receives 
the report submitted under subsection (b), the Comptroller General 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the 
Chairman of the Defense Business Systems Management Com-
mittee a written assessment of the report. 
(d) DETERMINATION OF CHAIRMAN OF DEFENSE BUSINESS SYS-
TEMS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.—Not sooner than 120 days after 
the date on which the Comptroller General receives the report 
submitted under subsection (b), the Chairman of the Defense Busi-
ness Systems Management Committee shall review the analysis 
included in the report, together with any other relevant information 
available to the Chairman, and submit to the congressional defense 
committees and the Secretary of the Navy the written determination
H. R. 5122—67
of the Chairman of whether the deployment of the MCTFS to 
the Navy is in the best interests of the Department of Defense. 
Subtitle D—Workplace and Depot Issues 
SEC. 331. PERMANENT EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN CONTRACT EXPENDI-
TURES 
FROM 
PERCENTAGE 
LIMITATION 
ON 
THE 
PERFORMANCE OF DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE. 
(a) PERMANENT EXCLUSION.—Section 2474(f) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(1) Amounts’’ and inserting ‘‘Amounts’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘entered into during fiscal years 2003 
through 2009’’; and 
(3) by striking paragraph (2). 
(b) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ITEMS IN ANNUAL REPORT.—
(1) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ITEMS.—Paragraph (2) of section 
2466(d) of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(2) Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include 
as a separate item any expenditure covered by section 2474(f) 
of this title that was made during the fiscal year covered by the 
report and shall specify the amount and nature of each such 
expenditure.’’. 
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for subsection 
(d) of section 2466 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘ANNUAL REPORT.—’’. 
SEC. 332. MINIMUM CAPITAL INVESTMENT FOR CERTAIN DEPOTS. 
(a) MINIMUM INVESTMENT LEVELS.—Chapter 146 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section: 
‘‘§ 2476. Minimum capital investment for certain depots 
‘‘(a) MINIMUM INVESTMENT.—Each fiscal year, the Secretary 
of a military department shall invest in the capital budgets of 
the covered depots of that military department a total amount 
equal to not less than six percent of the average total combined 
workload funded at all the depots of that military department 
for the preceding three fiscal years. 
‘‘(b) CAPITAL BUDGET.—For purposes of this section, the capital 
budget of a depot includes investment funds spent on depot infra-
structure, equipment, and process improvement in direct support 
of depot operations. 
‘‘(c) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the require-
ment under subsection (a) with respect to a military department 
for a fiscal year if the Secretary determines that the waiver is 
necessary for reasons of national security. Whenever the Secretary 
makes such a waiver, the Secretary shall notify the congressional 
defense committees of the waiver and the reasons for the waiver. 
‘‘(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—(1) Not later than 45 days after the 
date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for 
a fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report con-
taining budget justification documents summarizing the level of 
capital investment for each military department as of the end 
of the preceding fiscal year. 
‘‘(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include 
the following: