156 
(C) CREDIT FOR LAND, EASEMENTS, AND 
RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—Notwithstanding 
section 
221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(a)(4)(G)), the non-Federal 
interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
rights-of way, and relocations toward the non- 
Federal share of project cost (including all rea-
sonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
necessary for the construction, operation, and 
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 
25 percent of total project costs. 
(D) OPERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE.—The 
non-Federal share of operation and maintenance 
costs for projects constructed with assistance pro-
vided under this section shall be 100 percent. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section. 
(2) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.—Not more 
than 10 percent of the amounts made available to 
carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under 
this section at Federal expense. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
157 
SEC. 324. ISRAEL RIVER, LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
The project for flood control, Israel River, Lancaster, 
New Hampshire, carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is no longer author-
ized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 325. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, 
BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NEW MEXICO. 
The non-Federal share of the cost of the project for flood 
risk management, Middle Rio Grande, Bernalillo to Belen, 
New Mexico, authorized by section 401(2) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2735), shall be 
25 percent. 
SEC. 326. SOUTHWESTERN OREGON. 
(a) SOUTHWESTERN OREGON DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘Southwestern Oregon’’ means the counties 
of Benton, Coos, Curry, Douglas, Lane, Linn, and Jose-
phine, Oregon. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT
OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
may establish a program to provide environmental assist-
ance to non-Federal interests in Southwestern Oregon. 
(c) FORM OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance provided under 
this section may be in the form of design and construction 
assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure 
and resource protection and development projects in South-
western Oregon, including projects for wastewater treat-
ment and related facilities, water supply and related facili-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
158 
ties, environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development. 
(d) OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
the project is publicly owned. 
(e) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Before providing assistance 
under this section to a non-Federal interest, the Sec-
retary shall enter into a partnership agreement under 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d–5b) with the non-Federal interest with 
respect to the project to be carried out with such as-
sistance. 
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Each partnership agree-
ment for a project entered into under this subsection 
shall provide for the following: 
(A) Development by the Secretary, in con-
sultation with appropriate Federal and State of-
ficials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
development plan, including appropriate engi-
neering plans and specifications. 
(B) Establishment of such legal and institu-
tional structures as are necessary to ensure the 
effective long-term operation of the project by the 
non-Federal interest. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
159 
(3) COST SHARING.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the 
cost of a project carried out under this section— 
(i) shall be 75 percent; and 
(ii) may be provided in the form of 
grants or reimbursements of project costs. 
(B) CREDIT FOR INTEREST.—In case of a 
delay in the funding of the Federal share of a 
project that is the subject of a partnership agree-
ment under this section, the non-Federal interest 
shall receive credit for reasonable interest in-
curred in providing the non-Federal share of the 
project cost. 
(C) CREDIT FOR LAND, EASEMENTS, AND 
RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—Notwithstanding 
section 
221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(a)(4)(G)), the non-Federal 
interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non- 
Federal share of project cost (including all rea-
sonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
necessary for the construction, operation, and 
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 
25 percent of total project costs. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
160 
(D) OPERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE.—The 
non-Federal share of operation and maintenance 
costs for projects constructed with assistance pro-
vided under this section shall be 100 percent. 
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be ap-
propriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section. 
(2) CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSE.—Not more 
than 10 percent of the amounts made available to 
carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under 
this section at Federal expense. 
SEC. 327. WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TENNESSEE. 
Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
project for navigation, Wolf River Harbor, Tennessee, au-
thorized by section 202 of the National Industrial Recovery 
Act (48 Stat. 201; 49 Stat. 1034; 72 Stat. 308), is modified 
to reduce, in part, the authorized dimensions of the project, 
such that the remaining authorized dimensions are as fol-
lows: 
(1) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a 
center line beginning at an approximate point of 
35.139634, -90.062343 and extending approximately 
1,300 feet to an approximate point of 35.142077, 
-90.059107. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
161 
(2) A 200-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a 
center line beginning at an approximate point of 
35.142077, -90.059107 and extending approximately 
1,800 feet to an approximate point of 35.1467861, 
-90.057003. 
(3) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a 
center line beginning at an approximate point of 
35.1467861, -90.057003 and extending approximately 
5,550 feet to an approximate point of 35.160848, 
-90.050566. 
SEC. 328. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TEXAS. 
The Secretary is authorized to provide, pursuant to 
section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
709a), information and advice to non-Federal interests on 
the removal of sediment obstructing inflow channels to the 
Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, authorized pursuant to the 
project for Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries, Texas, under 
section 3a of the Act of August 11, 1939 (chapter 699, 53 
Stat. 1414; 68 Stat. 1258). 
SEC. 329. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA. 
Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 371) is amended by striking subsection 
(a) and inserting the following: 
‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.—In 
this section, the term ‘central West Virginia’ means the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
162 
counties of Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, Hardy, Hampshire, 
Morgan, Berkeley, Jefferson, Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, 
Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, 
Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Min-
eral, Grant, Brooke, and Ritchie, West Virginia.’’. 
SEC. 330. PUGET SOUND, WASHINGTON. 
In carrying out the project for ecosystem restoration, 
Puget Sound, Washington, authorized by section 1401(4) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 
1713), the Secretary shall consider the removal and replace-
ment of the Highway 101 causeway and bridges at the 
Duckabush River Estuary site to be a project feature, and 
not a relocation, and the Federal share of the costs of such 
removal and replacement shall be 65 percent. 
SEC. 331. WATER LEVEL MANAGEMENT PILOT PROJECT ON 
THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS 
WATERWAY SYSTEM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out a 
pilot project on water level management, as part of the op-
erations and maintenance of the 9-foot channel projects of 
the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System, 
to help redress the degrading influences of prolonged inun-
dation or sedimentation on such projects, and to improve 
the quality and quantity of habitat available for fish and 
wildlife. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
163 
(b) CONDITIONS ON DRAWDOWNS.—In carrying out 
the pilot project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
carry out routine and systemic water level drawdowns of 
the pools created by the Upper Mississippi River and Illi-
nois Waterway System locks and dams, including 
drawdowns during the growing season, when— 
(1) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to 
carry out a drawdown within applicable dam oper-
ating plans; or 
(2) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to 
carry out a drawdown and sufficient funds are avail-
able to the Secretary to carry out any additional ac-
tivities that may be required to ensure that the draw-
down does not adversely affect navigation. 
(c) COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION.— 
(1) COORDINATION.—The Secretary shall use ex-
isting coordination and consultation processes to reg-
ularly consult with other relevant Federal agencies 
and States regarding the planning and assessment of 
water level management actions implemented under 
this section. 
(2) NOTIFICATION.—Prior to carrying out any 
water level management plan pursuant to this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall provide notice to the public 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
164 
and to navigation interests and other interested stake-
holders. 
(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Upper 
Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System’’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 8001 of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 652 note). 
SEC. 332. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROTECTION. 
Section 2010 of the Water Resources Reform and De-
velopment Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1270; 132 Stat. 3812) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(f) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not recommend 
deauthorization of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and 
Dam pursuant to the disposition study carried out under 
subsection (d) unless the Secretary identifies a willing and 
capable non-Federal public entity to assume ownership of 
the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam. 
‘‘(g) MODIFICATION.—The Secretary is authorized to 
investigate 
the 
feasibility 
of 
modifying, 
prior 
to 
deauthorizing, the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam 
to add ecosystem restoration, including the prevention and 
control of invasive species, water supply, and recreation as 
authorized purposes.’’. 
SEC. 333. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN BENEFITS AND COSTS. 
Section 152(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2213a(a)) is amended by striking 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
165 
‘‘a flood risk management project that incidentally gen-
erates seismic safety benefits in regions’’ and inserting ‘‘a 
flood risk management or coastal storm risk management 
project in a region’’. 
SEC. 334. DEBRIS REMOVAL. 
Section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), 
is amended by striking ‘‘or recreation’’ and inserting ‘‘eco-
system restoration, or recreation’’. 
SEC. 335. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) 
LEVEE
SAFETY
INITIATIVE.—Section 
9005(g)(2)(E)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303a(g)(2)(E)(i)) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2026’’. 
(b) TRANSFER OF EXCESS CREDIT.—Section 1020 of 
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
(33 U.S.C. 2223) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘10 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on 
December 31, 2026’’; and 
(2) in subsection (e)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘10 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting 
‘‘December 31, 2026’’. 
(c) REHABILITATION OF EXISTING LEVEES.—Section 
3017(e) of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3303a note) is amended by striking 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
166 
‘‘the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2026’’. 
(d) INVASIVE SPECIES
IN ALPINE LAKES PILOT 
PROJECT.—Section 507(c) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2020 (16 U.S.C. 4701 note) is amended by 
striking ‘‘2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2026’’. 
(e) ENVIRONMENTAL BANKS.—Section 309(e) of the 
Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3957(e)) is amended by striking ‘‘10’’ and in-
serting ‘‘12’’. 
SEC. 336. CONVEYANCES. 
(a) GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.— 
(1) SURVEY TO OBTAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.— 
The exact acreage and the legal description of any 
real property or easement to be conveyed under this 
section shall be determined by a survey that is satis-
factory to the Secretary. 
(2) APPLICABILITY
OF
PROPERTY
SCREENING 
PROVISIONS.—Section 2696 of title 10, United States 
Code, shall not apply to any conveyance under this 
section. 
(3) COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—An entity to which 
a conveyance is made under this section shall be re-
sponsible for all reasonable and necessary costs, in-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
167 
cluding real estate transaction and environmental 
documentation costs, associated with the conveyance. 
(4) LIABILITY.—An entity to which a conveyance 
is made under this section shall hold the United 
States harmless from any liability with respect to ac-
tivities carried out, on or after the date of the convey-
ance, on the real property conveyed. The United 
States shall remain responsible for any liability with 
respect to activities carried out, before such date, on 
the real property conveyed. 
(5) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 
Secretary may require that any conveyance under 
this section be subject to such additional terms and 
conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United 
States. 
(b) ROGERS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary 
is authorized to convey to the City of Tulsa-Rogers 
County Port Authority, all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to the real property de-
scribed in paragraph (2). 
(2) PROPERTY.—The property to be conveyed 
under this subsection is the approximately 176 acres 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
168 
of Federal land located on the following 3 parcels in 
Rogers County, Oklahoma: 
(A) Parcel 1 consists of U.S. tract 119 (par-
tial), U.S. tract 123, U.S. tract 120, U.S. tract 
125, and U.S. tract 118 (partial). 
(B) Parcel 2 consists of U.S. tract 124 (par-
tial) and U.S. tract 128 (partial). 
(C) Parcel 3 consists of U.S. tract 128 (par-
tial). 
(3) RESERVATION
OF
RIGHTS.—The Secretary 
shall reserve and retain from any conveyance under 
this subsection such easements, rights-of-way, and 
other interests that the Secretary determines to be nec-
essary and appropriate to ensure the continued oper-
ation of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River naviga-
tion project (including Newt Graham Lock and Dam 
18) authorized under the comprehensive plan for the 
Arkansas River Basin by the Act of June 28, 1938 
(chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218; 60 Stat. 634; 60 Stat. 
647; 101 Stat. 1329–112; 117 Stat. 1842). 
(4) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the prop-
erty under this subsection by quitclaim deed under 
such terms and conditions as the Secretary deter-
mines appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
169 
(5) CONSIDERATION.—The City of Tulsa-Rogers 
County Port Authority shall pay to the Secretary an 
amount that is not less than the fair market value of 
the property conveyed under this subsection, as deter-
mined by the Secretary. 
(c) REGIONAL CORPS OF ENGINEERS OFFICE, CORPUS 
CHRISTI, TEXAS.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—At such time as 
new facilities are available to be used as the office for 
the Galveston District of the Corps of Engineers, the 
Secretary shall convey to the Port of Corpus Christi, 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the property described in paragraph (2). 
(2) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The property 
referred to in paragraph (1) is the land known as 
Tract 100 and Tract 101, including improvements on 
that land, in Corpus Christi, Texas, and described as 
follows: 
(A) TRACT 100.—The 1.89 acres, more or 
less, as conveyed by the Nueces County Naviga-
tion District No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, to 
the United States by instrument dated October 
16, 1928, and recorded at Volume 193, pages 1 
and 2, in the Deed Records of Nueces County, 
Texas. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
170 
(B) TRACT 101.—The 0.53 acres as conveyed 
by the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, 
Texas, to the United States by instrument dated 
September 24, 1971, and recorded at Volume 
318, pages 523 and 524, in the Deed Records of 
Nueces County, Texas. 
(C) IMPROVEMENTS.— 
(i) Main Building (RPUID AO–C– 
3516), constructed January 9, 1974. 
(ii) Garage, vehicle with 5 bays 
(RPUID AO–C–3517), constructed January 
9, 1985. 
(iii) Bulkhead, Upper (RPUID AO–C– 
2658), constructed January 1, 1941. 
(iv) Bulkhead, Lower (RPUID AO–C– 
3520), constructed January 1, 1933. 
(v) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO–C– 
3521), constructed January 9, 1985. 
(vi) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO–C– 
3522), constructed January 9, 1985. 
(3) DEED.—The Secretary shall convey the prop-
erty under this subsection by quitclaim deed under 
such terms and conditions as the Secretary deter-
mines appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
171 
(4) CONSIDERATION.—The Port of Corpus Chris-
ti shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not 
less than the fair market value of the property (in-
cluding improvements) conveyed under this sub-
section, as determined by the Secretary. 
SEC. 337. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE. 
(a) NEW PROJECTS.—Section 219(f) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: 
‘‘(274) CHANDLER, ARIZONA.—$18,750,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of 
Chandler, Arizona. 
‘‘(275) PINAL
COUNTY, ARIZONA.—$40,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in Pinal 
County, Arizona. 
‘‘(276) TEMPE, ARIZONA.—$37,500,000 for water 
and wastewater infrastructure, including water rec-
lamation and groundwater recharge, for the City of 
Tempe, Arizona. 
‘‘(277) 
BELL
GARDENS, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$12,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including water recycling and water supply, in the 
city of Bell Gardens, California. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
172 
‘‘(278) CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA.—$3,500,000 for 
stormwater management and water supply infra-
structure, including groundwater recharge and water 
recycling, in the city of Calimesa, California. 
‘‘(279) 
COMPTON
CREEK, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$6,165,000 for stormwater management infrastructure 
in the vicinity of Compton Creek, city of Compton, 
California. 
‘‘(280) DOWNEY, CALIFORNIA.—$100,000,000 for 
water infrastructure, including water supply, in the 
city of Downey, California. 
‘‘(281) LOMITA, 
CALIFORNIA.—$4,716,600 for 
stormwater management infrastructure in the city of 
Lomita, California. 
‘‘(282) EAST SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.— 
$70,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including water recycling and water supply, in East 
County, San Diego County, California. 
‘‘(283) EASTERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—$25,000,000 for the planning, design, and 
construction of water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including water recycling and water supply, for the 
cities of Azusa, Baldwin Park, Covina, Duarte, El 
Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Puente, La 
Verne, Monrovia, San Dimas, and West Covina, and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
173 
for Avocado Heights, Bassett, and Valinda, Cali-
fornia. 
‘‘(284) 
ESCONDIDO
CREEK, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$34,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management, in the vicinity of 
Escondido Creek, city of Escondido, California. 
‘‘(285) FONTANA, CALIFORNIA.—$16,000,000 for 
stormwater management infrastructure in the city of 
Fontana, California. 
‘‘(286) HEALDSBURG, CALIFORNIA.—$23,500,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
water recycling and water supply, in the city of 
Healdsburg, California. 
‘‘(287) 
INLAND
EMPIRE, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$60,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including water supply, in Riverside County and San 
Bernardino County, California. 
‘‘(288) 
MARIN
COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$28,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including water supply, in Marin County, California. 
‘‘(289) MAYWOOD, CALIFORNIA.—$10,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Maywood, 
California. 
‘‘(290) MONTEREY
PENINSULA, CALIFORNIA.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
174 
and water supply, on the Monterey Peninsula, Cali-
fornia. 
‘‘(291) 
NORTH
RICHMOND, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$45,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including coastal flooding resilience measures for such 
infrastructure, in North Richmond, California. 
‘‘(292) ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA.—$40,700,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including water 
recycling and water supply, in the city of Ontario, 
California. 
‘‘(293) PARAMOUNT, CALIFORNIA.—$20,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the city of Paramount, 
California. 
‘‘(294) PETALUMA, 
CALIFORNIA.—$13,700,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
water recycling, in the city of Petaluma, California. 
‘‘(295) RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.—$27,500,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Rialto, Cali-
fornia. 
‘‘(296) RINCON
RESERVATION, CALIFORNIA.— 
$38,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
on the Rincon Band of Luisen˜o Indians reservation, 
California. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
175 
‘‘(297) SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALI-
FORNIA.—$50,000,000 for water and wastewater in-
frastructure (including stormwater management), 
water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water protection and develop-
ment, including flooding resilience measures for such 
infrastructure, in Contra Costa County, San Joaquin 
County, Solano County, Sacramento County, and 
Yolo County, California. 
‘‘(298) SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.— 
$270,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastruc-
ture, including stormwater management and water 
recycling, at the San Francisco International Air-
port, California. 
‘‘(299) SAN
JOAQUIN
AND
STANISLAUS, CALI-
FORNIA.—$200,000,000 for water and wastewater in-
frastructure, including stormwater management, and 
water supply, in San Joaquin County and Stanislaus 
County, California. 
‘‘(300) SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA.—$19,400,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, in the city 
of Santa Rosa California. 
‘‘(301) 
SIERRA
MADRE, 
CALIFORNIA.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
and water supply, including earthquake resilience 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
176 
measures for such infrastructure and water supply, in 
the city of Sierra Madre, California. 
‘‘(302) SMITH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.—$25,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure in Howonquet Village 
and Resort and Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation, Smith River, 
California. 
‘‘(303) TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA.—$100,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
groundwater recharge and water supply, in the city 
of Torrance, California. 
‘‘(304) WESTERN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—$15,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure 
in the cities of Pinole, San Pablo, and Richmond, 
and in El Sobrante, California. 
‘‘(305) HEBRON, CONNECTICUT.—$3,700,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of 
Hebron, Connecticut. 
‘‘(306) 
NEW
LONDON, 
CONNECTICUT.— 
$16,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure in the town 
of Bozrah and the City of Norwich, Connecticut. 
‘‘(307) WINDHAM, CONNECTICUT.—$18,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town 
of Windham, Connecticut. 
‘‘(308) NEW CASTLE, DELAWARE.—$35,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
177 
stormwater management, in New Castle County, 
Delaware. 
‘‘(309) WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.— 
$1,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management, in Washington, 
District of Columbia. 
‘‘(310) LONGBOAT KEY, FLORIDA.—$12,750,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town 
of Longboat Key, Florida. 
‘‘(311) MARTIN, ST. LUCIE, AND PALM BEACH 
COUNTIES, FLORIDA.—$100,000,000 for water and 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, to improve water quality in the St. 
Lucie River, Indian River Lagoon, and Lake Worth 
Lagoon in Martin County, St. Lucie County, and 
Palm Beach County, Florida. 
‘‘(312) POLK
COUNTY, FLORIDA.—$10,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in Polk County, Florida. 
‘‘(313) 
OKEECHOBEE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.— 
$20,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure in Okee-
chobee County, Florida. 
‘‘(314) ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA.—$50,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
178 
water reclamation and water supply, in Orange 
County, Florida. 
‘‘(315) GUAM.—$10,000,000 for water and 
wastewater infrastructure in Guam. 
‘‘(316) 
COUNTY
OF
HAWAI‘I, 
HAWAII.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management, in the County of 
Hawai‘i, Hawaii. 
‘‘(317) HONOLULU, HAWAII.—$20,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the City and County of 
Honolulu, Hawaii. 
‘‘(318) KAUA‘I, HAWAII.—$20,000,000 for water 
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in the County of Kaua‘i, Hawaii. 
‘‘(319) MAUI, HAWAII.—$20,000,000 for water 
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in the County of Maui, Hawaii. 
‘‘(320) DIXMOOR, 
ILLINOIS.—$15,000,000 for 
water and water supply infrastructure in the village 
of Dixmoor, Illinois. 
‘‘(321) FOREST
PARK, ILLINOIS.—$10,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in the village of Forest Park, Illinois. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
179 
‘‘(322) LAKE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS.—$10,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in Lake County, Illinois. 
‘‘(323) LEMONT, ILLINOIS.—$3,135,000 for water 
infrastructure in the village of Lemont, Illinois. 
‘‘(324) LOCKPORT, 
ILLINOIS.—$6,550,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the city of Lockport, Illinois. 
‘‘(325) MONTGOMERY AND CHRISTIAN COUNTIES, 
ILLINOIS.—$30,000,000 for water and wastewater in-
frastructure, including water supply, in Montgomery 
County and Christian County, Illinois. 
‘‘(326) WILL
COUNTY, ILLINOIS.—$30,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in Will County, Illinois. 
‘‘(327) 
ORLEANS
PARISH, 
LOUISIANA.— 
$100,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. 
‘‘(328) 
FITCHBURG, 
MASSACHUSETTS.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management (including com-
bined sewer overflows), in the city of Fitchburg, Mas-
sachusetts. 
‘‘(329) 
HAVERHILL, 
MASSACHUSETTS.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
180 
including stormwater management (including com-
bined sewer overflows), in the city of Haverhill, Mas-
sachusetts. 
‘‘(330) 
LAWRENCE, 
MASSACHUSETTS.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management (including com-
bined sewer overflows), in the city of Lawrence, Mas-
sachusetts. 
‘‘(331) LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS.—$20,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management (including combined sewer 
overflows), in the city of Lowell, Massachusetts. 
‘‘(332) 
METHUEN, 
MASSACHUSETTS.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management (including com-
bined sewer overflows), in the city of Methuen, Massa-
chusetts. 
‘‘(333) BOONSBORO, MARYLAND.—$5,000,000 for 
water infrastructure, including water supply, in the 
town of Boonsboro, Maryland. 
‘‘(334) BRUNSWICK, 
MARYLAND.—$15,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of 
Brunswick, Maryland. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
181 
‘‘(335) CASCADE
CHARTER
TOWNSHIP, MICHI-
GAN.—$7,200,000 for water and wastewater infra-
structure in Cascade Charter Township, Michigan. 
‘‘(336) 
MACOMB
COUNTY, 
MICHIGAN.— 
$40,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in Macomb County, Michi-
gan. 
‘‘(337) NORTHFIELD, MINNESOTA.—$33,450,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of 
Northfield, Minnesota. 
‘‘(338) CENTERTOWN, MISSOURI.—$15,900,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the village 
of Centertown, Missouri. 
‘‘(339) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—$45,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of St. 
Louis, Missouri. 
‘‘(340) 
ST. 
LOUIS
COUNTY, 
MISSOURI.— 
$45,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
in St. Louis County, Missouri. 
‘‘(341) MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI.—$10,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the city of Meridian, 
Mississippi. 
‘‘(342) OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI.—$10,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
182 
stormwater management, in the City of Oxford, Mis-
sissippi. 
‘‘(343) 
MANCHESTER, 
NEW
HAMPSHIRE.— 
$20,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
including stormwater management (including com-
bined sewer overflows), in the city of Manchester, New 
Hampshire. 
‘‘(344) BAYONNE, NEW
JERSEY.—$825,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management (including combined sewer overflows), in 
the city of Bayonne, New Jersey. 
‘‘(345) CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY.—$119,000,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the city of Camden, New Jersey. 
‘‘(346) ESSEX AND SUSSEX COUNTIES, NEW JER-
SEY.—$60,000,000 for water and wastewater infra-
structure, including water supply, in Essex County 
and Sussex County, New Jersey. 
‘‘(347) FLEMINGTON, NEW JERSEY.—$4,500,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
water supply, in the Borough of Flemington, New 
Jersey. 
‘‘(348) JEFFERSON, NEW JERSEY.—$90,000,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in Jefferson Township, New Jersey. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
183 
‘‘(349) KEARNY, NEW JERSEY.—$69,900,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management (including combined sewer overflows), in 
the town of Kearny, New Jersey. 
‘‘(350) LONG
HILL, NEW
JERSEY.—$7,500,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in Long Hill Township, New Jersey. 
‘‘(351) 
MORRIS
COUNTY, 
NEW
JERSEY.— 
$30,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
in Morris County, New Jersey. 
‘‘(352) PASSAIC, NEW JERSEY.—$1,000,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in Passaic County, New Jersey. 
‘‘(353) 
PHILLIPSBURG, 
NEW
JERSEY.— 
$2,600,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the town of Phillipsburg, 
New Jersey. 
‘‘(354) RAHWAY, NEW JERSEY.—$3,250,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of 
Rahway, New Jersey. 
‘‘(355) ROSELLE, NEW JERSEY.—$5,000,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the Borough of Roselle, New Jersey. 
‘‘(356) SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE, NEW JERSEY.— 
$7,500,000 for water infrastructure, including water 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
184 
supply, in the Township of South Orange Village, 
New Jersey. 
‘‘(357) SUMMIT, NEW JERSEY.—$1,000,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the city of Summit, New Jersey. 
‘‘(358) WARREN, NEW JERSEY.—$4,550,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in Warren Township, New Jersey. 
‘‘(359) ESPAN˜OLA, NEW
MEXICO.—$21,995,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of 
Espan˜ola, New Mexico. 
‘‘(360) FARMINGTON, NEW MEXICO.—$15,500,000 
for water infrastructure, including water supply, in 
the city of Farmington, New Mexico. 
‘‘(361) 
MORA
COUNTY, 
NEW
MEXICO.— 
$2,874,000 for wastewater infrastructure in Mora 
County, New Mexico. 
‘‘(362) SANTA
FE, NEW
MEXICO.—$20,700,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
water reclamation, in the city of Santa Fe, New Mex-
ico. 
‘‘(363) CLARKSTOWN, NEW YORK.—$14,600,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
management, in the town of Clarkstown, New York. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
185 
‘‘(364) GENESEE, NEW YORK.—$85,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management and water supply, in Gen-
esee County, New York. 
‘‘(365) QUEENS, NEW YORK.—$119,200,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management (including combined sewer 
overflows), in Queens, New York. 
‘‘(366) YORKTOWN, NEW YORK.—$40,000,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the town of Yorktown, New York. 
‘‘(367) 
BRUNSWICK, 
OHIO.—$4,510,000 
for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management, in the city of Brunswick, Ohio. 
‘‘(368) BROOKINGS, OREGON.—$2,000,000 for 
wastewater infrastructure in the City of Brookings 
and the Port of Brookings Harbor, Oregon. 
‘‘(369) MONROE, OREGON.—$6,000,000 for water 
and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Monroe, 
Oregon. 
‘‘(370) NEWPORT, 
OREGON.—$60,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including water 
supply, in the city of Newport, Oregon. 
‘‘(371) LANE COUNTY, OREGON.—$25,000,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including water 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00185
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
186 
supply and storage, distribution, and treatment sys-
tems, in Lane County, Oregon. 
‘‘(372) PALMYRA, PENNSYLVANIA.—$36,300,000 
for wastewater infrastructure in Palmyra Township, 
Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(373) 
PIKE
COUNTY, 
PENNSYLVANIA.— 
$10,000,000 for water and stormwater management 
infrastructure, including water supply, in Pike Coun-
ty, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(374) 
PITTSBURGH, 
PENNSYLVANIA.— 
$20,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the city of Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(375) POCONO, 
PENNSYLVANIA.—$22,000,000 
for water and wastewater infrastructure in Pocono 
Township, Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(376) WESTFALL, PENNSYLVANIA.—$16,880,000 
for wastewater infrastructure in Westfall Township, 
Pennsylvania. 
‘‘(377) WHITEHALL, PENNSYLVANIA.—$6,000,000 
for stormwater management infrastructure in White-
hall Township and South Whitehall Township, Penn-
sylvania. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
187 
‘‘(378) 
BEAUFORT, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.— 
$7,462,000 for stormwater management infrastructure 
in Beaufort County, South Carolina. 
‘‘(379) 
CHARLESTON, 
SOUTH
CAROLINA.— 
$25,583,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the city of Charleston, 
South Carolina. 
‘‘(380) MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA.— 
$7,822,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in the town of Mount Pleas-
ant, South Carolina. 
‘‘(381) PORTLAND, TENNESSEE.—$1,850,000 for 
water and wastewater infrastructure, including water 
supply, in the city of Portland, Tennessee. 
‘‘(382) 
SMITH
COUNTY, 
TENNESSEE.— 
$19,500,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater management, in Smith County, Ten-
nessee. 
‘‘(383) TROUSDALE, MACON, AND SUMNER COUN-
TIES, 
TENNESSEE.—$178,000,000 for water and 
wastewater infrastructure in Trousdale County, 
Macon County, and Sumner County, Tennessee. 
‘‘(384) VIRGIN ISLANDS.—$1,584,000 for waste-
water infrastructure in the United States Virgin Is-
lands. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
189 
ty, Kittitas County, Pierce County, Snohomish Coun-
ty, Skagit County, and Whatcom County, Wash-
ington. 
‘‘(392) MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN.—$4,500,000 for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater 
management (including combined sewer overflows), in 
the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.’’. 
(b) PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.— 
(1) CONSISTENCY
WITH
REPORTS.—Congress 
finds that the project modifications described in this 
subsection are in accordance with the reports sub-
mitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 
7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ‘‘Report to Con-
gress on Future Water Resources Development’’, or 
have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. 
(2) MODIFICATIONS.— 
(A) SACRAMENTO AREA, CALIFORNIA.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
117 Stat. 1840; 134 Stat. 2718) is amended by 
striking ‘‘Suburban’’. 
(B) LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.— 
Section 219(f)(93) of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
190 
336; 117 Stat. 1840; 121 Stat. 1259) is amend-
ed— 
(i) by striking ‘‘$3,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$103,000,000’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘wastewater and water 
related 
infrastructure,’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘water and wastewater infrastructure, in-
cluding stormwater management,’’; and 
(iii) by inserting ‘‘Dominguez Chan-
nel, Santa Clarita Valley,’’ after ‘‘La 
Habra Heights,’’. 
(C) BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO.—Section 
219(f)(109) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 
Stat. 2763A–220) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000 for water supply infrastructure’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000 for water and waste-
water infrastructure, including stormwater man-
agement and water supply’’. 
(D) CHARLOTTE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(121) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
121 Stat. 1261) is amended by striking 
‘‘$3,000,000 for’’ and inserting ‘‘$33,000,000 for 
wastewater and’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
191 
(E) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.—Sec-
tion 219(f)(128) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
121 Stat. 1261) is amended by striking 
‘‘$6,250,000 for’’ and inserting ‘‘$190,250,000 
for wastewater infrastructure, including’’. 
(F) ALBANY, GEORGIA.—Section 219(f)(130) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) 
is amended by striking ‘‘$4,000,000 for a storm 
drainage system,’’ and inserting ‘‘$109,000,000 
for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater management (including combined 
sewer overflows),’’. 
(G) ATLANTA, GEORGIA.—Section 219(e)(5) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) 
is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$75,000,000’’. 
(H) 
EAST
POINT, 
GEORGIA.—Section 
219(f)(136) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 
Stat. 1261) is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000,000 
for’’ and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000 for stormwater 
management and other’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00191
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
192 
(I) 
COOK
COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—Section 
219(f)(54) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 
Stat. 2763A–220) is amended by striking 
‘‘$35,000,000 for’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000,000 
for 
wastewater 
infrastructure, 
including 
stormwater management, and other’’. 
(J) CALUMET
REGION, INDIANA.—Section 
219(f)(12)(A) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 
117 Stat. 1843; 121 Stat. 1225) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘$100,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$125,000,000’’. 
(K) BATON
ROUGE, LOUISIANA.—Section 
219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 
Stat. 2763A–220; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘$35,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$90,000,000’’. 
(L) SOUTH CENTRAL PLANNING AND DEVEL-
OPMENT
COMMISSION, 
LOUISIANA.—Section 
219(f)(153) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 
Stat. 1262) is amended by striking ‘‘$2,500,000’’ 
and inserting ‘‘$12,500,000’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
193 
(M) 
ST. 
CHARLES, 
ST. 
BERNARD, 
PLAQUEMINES, ST. JOHN
THE
BAPTIST, ST. 
JAMES, 
AND
ASSUMPTION
PARISHES, 
LOU-
ISIANA.— 
(i) ST. CHARLES, ST. BERNARD, AND 
PLAQUEMINES PARISHES, LOUISIANA.—Sec-
tion 219(c)(33) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
Stat. 334; 114 Stat. 2763A–219) is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘Water and wastewater in-
frastructure’’ and inserting ‘‘Water supply 
and wastewater infrastructure, including 
stormwater infrastructure’’. 
(ii) ST. 
JOHN
THE
BAPTIST, 
ST. 
JAMES, AND ASSUMPTION PARISHES, LOU-
ISIANA.—Section 219(c)(34) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 Stat. 2763A– 
219) is amended— 
(I) in the paragraph heading, by 
striking ‘‘BAPTIST
AND
ST. JAMES’’ 
and inserting ‘‘BAPTIST, ST. JAMES, 
AND ASSUMPTION’’; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00193
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
194 
(II) by striking ‘‘Baptist and St. 
James’’ and inserting ‘‘Baptist, St. 
James, and Assumption’’. 
(iii) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIA-
TIONS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ASSISTANCE.— 
Section 219(e) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 
Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1192) 
is amended— 
(I) by striking the ‘‘and’’ at the 
end of paragraph (16); 
(II) by striking the period at the 
end of paragraph (17) and inserting a 
semicolon; and 
(III) by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(18) $70,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(33); and 
‘‘(19) $36,000,000 for the project described in 
subsection (c)(34).’’. 
(N) MICHIGAN
COMBINED
SEWER
OVER-
FLOWS.—Section 219(f)(157) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1262) is amended 
by striking ‘‘correction of combined sewer over-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00194
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
195 
flows’’ and inserting ‘‘water and wastewater in-
frastructure, including stormwater management 
(including correction of combined sewer over-
flows)’’. 
(O) ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.— 
Section 219(f)(66)(A) of the Water Resources De-
velopment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
336; 114 Stat. 2763A–221; 121 Stat. 1240) is 
amended by striking ‘‘$20,000,000 for’’ and in-
serting ‘‘$30,000,000 for wastewater infrastruc-
ture, including stormwater management, and 
other’’. 
(P) LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH 
CAROLINA.—Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A–220; 117 
Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818; 134 
Stat. 
2719) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$110,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$165,000,000’’. 
(Q) EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIR-
GINIA.—Section 219(f)(10)(A) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1255) is amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$20,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$52,000,000’’. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
01:11 Jun 08, 2022
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H7776.RH
H7776
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS