datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(1) parties participating in standards develop-
ment activity of standards development organiza-
tions within the scope of this Act, or 
(2) other organizations and parties engaged in 
standard-setting processes not within the scope of 
this amendment to the Act.
and that describes such activity in general 
terms’’ before the period at the end, and 
(B) in the last sentence by inserting ‘‘or 
available to such organization, as the case may 
be’’ before the period, 
(3) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ‘‘, or the 
standards development activity,’’ after ‘‘venture’’, 
(4) in subsection (e)—
(A) by striking ‘‘person who’’ and inserting 
‘‘person or standards development organization 
that’’, and 
(B) by inserting ‘‘or any standards devel-
opment organization’’ after ‘‘person’’ the last 
place it appears, and 
(5) in subsection (g)(1) by inserting ‘‘or stand-
ards development organization’’ after ‘‘person’’. 
SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to alter or 
modify the antitrust treatment under existing law of—
(1) parties participating in standards develop-
ment activity of standards development organiza-
tions within the scope of this Act, or
(2) other organizations and parties engaged in 
standard-setting processes not within the scope of 
this amendment to the Act.
Æ
Union Calendar No. 63 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 1086 
[Report No. 108–125] 
A BILL 
To encourage the development and promulgation of 
voluntary consensus standards by providing relief 
under the antitrust laws to standards develop-
ment organizations with respect to conduct en-
gaged in for the purpose of developing voluntary 
consensus standards, and for other purposes. 
MAY 22, 2003 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Southern Oregon. These forests are found within the 
boundaries of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National 
Forests, Olympic National Forest, Gifford Pinchot 
National Forest, Siuslaw National Forest, Mount 
Hood National Forest, Willamette National Forest, 
Umpqua National Forest, Rogue River National 
Forest, Salem Bureau of Land Management Dis-
trict, Eugene Bureau of Land Management District, 
Roseburg Bureau of Land Management District, 
Coos Bay Bureau of Land Management District, 
and Medford Bureau of Land Management District. 
(3) 
FOREST
HEALTH.—The 
term 
‘‘forest 
health’’, with respect to an area of Westside Forest 
land, refers to the ability of the land to support via-
ble native species assemblages or to have, or be de-
veloping, historic species composition, function, and 
structure and hydrologic function. 
(4) LATE-SUCCESSIONAL RESERVE.—The term 
‘‘late-successional reserve’’ means land area des-
ignated as a ‘‘late-successional reserve’’ pursuant to 
the Northwest Forest Plan. 
(5) OLD
GROWTH.—The term ‘‘old growth’’ 
means late-successional and mature multi-storied 
conifer forest stands, more than 120 years old as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act, that provide,
or are likely to provide, complex habitat for associ-
ated species assemblages. 
(6) YOUNG
MANAGED
STANDS.—The term 
‘‘young managed stand’’ means a stand of trees 
where the overstory has been mechanically removed 
and the stand has been artificially regenerated. 
SEC. 3. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Northwest Forest Plan can be better 
implemented. Better implementation and funding of 
the Northwest Forest Plan could significantly im-
prove protection for native forest ecosystems and 
wildlife and substantially increase timber production 
and economic opportunities for rural communities. 
(2) Logging of old-growth forests diminishes a 
unique natural heritage, as well as habitat for rare, 
threatened and endangered species. Old-growth log-
ging creates intense public controversy that has pre-
vented attainment of the social and economic goals 
of the Northwest Forest Plan. Thinning in younger, 
previously managed forests, on the contrary, can 
help recover habitat, reduce controversy, and create 
certainty and stability in wood fiber production. 
(3) To improve habitat and to capture future 
commodity production potential, the Forest Service
and Mexico, except that such term does not include 
any standard metropolitan statistical area that has 
a population exceeding 1,000,000. 
(b) GRANT PROGRAM.—To the extent amounts are 
made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may 
make grants under this section to 1 or more regional orga-
nizations to enhance the availability of affordable housing, 
economic opportunity, and infrastructure in the colonias. 
(c) GRANTS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Grants under this section 
may be made only to regional organizations selected 
pursuant to subsection (d). 
(2) SELECTION.—After a regional organization 
has been selected pursuant to subsection (d) to re-
ceive a grant under this section, the Secretary may 
provide a grant to such organization in subsequent 
fiscal years, subject to subsection (f)(2). 
(d) SELECTION OF REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall select 1 
or more regional organizations that submit applica-
tions for grants under this section to receive such 
grants. 
(2) COMPETITION.—The selection under para-
graph (1) shall be made pursuant to a competition, 
which shall—
stitutions of higher education, municipalities, and local 
governments for the purchase of hybrid electric vehicles 
or high-efficiency vehicles. 
(b) REPAYMENT TERM.—The time for repayment of 
a loan under this section may not exceed five years. 
(c) SECURITY INTEREST.—The Secretary shall re-
quire, as a condition of a loan under this section, that 
the borrower grant to the United States a security interest 
in any vehicle purchased with the proceeds of such loan. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘high-efficiency vehicle’’ means a 
motor vehicle that uses a fuel other than gasoline or 
diesel fuel. 
(2) The term ‘‘hybrid electric vehicle’’ means a 
motor vehicle with a fuel-efficient gasoline engine as-
sisted by an electric motor. 
(3) The term ‘‘motor vehicle’’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 30102(a)(6) of title 49, 
United States Code. 
(4) The term ‘‘local educational agency’’ has 
the meaning given that term in the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 
et seq.). 
(5) The term ‘‘public institution of higher edu-
cation’’ has the meaning given the term ‘‘institution
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1089
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to offer federally financed, interest-
free loans to public schools, municipalities, and local governments for 
the purchase of hybrid electric or other high-efficiency vehicles, and 
for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 5, 2003
Mr. ENGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to offer federally 
financed, interest-free loans to public schools, municipali-
ties, and local governments for the purchase of hybrid 
electric or other high-efficiency vehicles, and for other 
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. LOANS FOR HIGH-EFFICIENCY VEHICLES. 
(a) LOAN PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—Subject to the 
availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Transpor-
tation shall establish a program to offer federally financed, 
interest-free loans to local educational agencies, public in-
of higher education’’ in section 101(a) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), but 
does not include private institutions described in 
that section. 
(e) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009 
and such sums as may be necessary for each fiscal year 
thereafter.
Æ
SECTION 1. COSTS OF REVIEWS FOR CONVEYANCES UNDER
EDUCATION LAND GRANT ACT.
Section 202 of the Education Land Grant Act (16
U.S.C. 479a) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(f) COSTS OF REVIEW.—The Secretary shall pay the
costs of all action required under section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)) with respect to any conveyance under this
section.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2003.
Attest:
Clerk.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 108
To amend the Education Land Grant Act to require the Secretary of Agri-
culture to pay the costs of environmental reviews with respect to convey-
ances under that Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2003
Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Education Land Grant Act to require the 
Secretary of Agriculture to pay the costs of environ-
mental reviews with respect to conveyances under that 
Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. COSTS OF REVIEWS FOR CONVEYANCES UNDER 
EDUCATION LAND GRANT ACT. 
Section 202 of the Education Land Grant Act (16 
U.S.C. 479a) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(f) COSTS OF REVIEW.—The Secretary shall pay the 
costs of all action required under section 102(2)(C) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(C)) with respect to any conveyance under this 
section.’’.
Æ
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 108
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
APRIL 9, 2003
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 
and Forestry 
AN ACT 
To amend the Education Land Grant Act to require the 
Secretary of Agriculture to pay the costs of environ-
mental reviews with respect to conveyances under that 
Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 108 RFS 
SECTION 1. COSTS OF REVIEWS FOR CONVEYANCES UNDER 
EDUCATION LAND GRANT ACT. 
Section 202 of the Education Land Grant Act (16 
U.S.C. 479a) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(f) COSTS OF REVIEW.—The Secretary shall pay the 
costs of all action required under section 102(2)(C) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(C)) with respect to any conveyance under this 
section.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2003. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
and patrol vehicles, an air traffic control tower, a
training facility, and a warehouse.
(4) LIMITATION.—None of the amounts made
available to the Carson Water Subconservancy Dis-
trict under paragraph (1)(B) shall be used to pay
the costs of litigation.
(e) RELATION TO OTHER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
LAWS.—The land described in subsection (a) shall not be
subject to chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code, as
codified by Public Law 107–217 (116 Stat. 1062).
(f) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights,
all Federal land described in subsection (a) is withdrawn
from location, entry, and patent under the public land
laws, mining laws, and mineral leasing laws, including geo-
thermal leasing laws.
(g) REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDERS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—To facilitate the sale of par-
cels of land described in subsection (a), the Sec-
retary shall revoke any public land orders in exist-
ence on the date of the enactment of this Act that
withdraw the parcels from all forms of appropriation
under the public land laws, to the extent that the or-
ders apply to land described in such subsection (a).
(2) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—A revocation under
paragraph (1) shall be effective on the date on which
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1090
To require that ten percent of the motor vehicles purchased by Executive 
agencies be hybrid electric vehicles or high-efficiency vehicles. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 5, 2003
Mr. ENGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Government Reform 
A BILL 
To require that ten percent of the motor vehicles purchased 
by Executive agencies be hybrid electric vehicles or high-
efficiency vehicles.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT REGARDING PURCHASE OF 
MOTOR VEHICLES BY EXECUTIVE AGENCIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—At least ten percent of the motor 
vehicles purchased by an Executive agency in any fiscal 
year shall be comprised of high-efficiency vehicles or hy-
brid electric vehicles. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act:
(1) The term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 105 of title 5, 
United States Code, but also includes Amtrak, the 
Smithsonian Institution, and the United States 
Postal Service. 
(2) The term ‘‘high-efficiency vehicle’’ means a 
motor vehicle that uses a fuel other than gasoline or 
diesel fuel. 
(3) The term ‘‘hybrid electric vehicle’’ means a 
motor vehicle with a fuel-efficient gasoline engine as-
sisted by an electric motor. 
(4) The term ‘‘motor vehicle’’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 102(7) of title 40, United 
States Code. 
(c) PRO-RATED APPLICABILITY IN YEAR OF ENACT-
MENT.—In the fiscal year in which this Act is enacted, 
the requirement in subsection (a) shall only apply with re-
spect to motor vehicles purchased after the date of the 
enactment of this Act in such fiscal year.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1091
To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to make leaf tobacco 
an eligible commodity for the Market Access Program. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 5, 2003
Mr. ETHERIDGE (for himself, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. FLETCH-
ER, Mr. GORDON, Mr. GOODE, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. CLY-
BURN, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, and Mr. LEWIS of Ken-
tucky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Agriculture 
A BILL 
To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to 
make leaf tobacco an eligible commodity for the Market 
Access Program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
That section 1302(b)(3) of the Agricultural Reconciliation 
Act of 1993 (7 U.S.C. 5623 note) is amended by inserting 
‘‘, other than leaf tobacco’’ after ‘‘tobacco’’.
Æ
Northwest Forest Plan, as well as identified old growth 
forests. 
(e) PROJECTS ON MATRIX LAND.—For matrix land 
containing old growth stands, an administrative unit shall 
not plan, advertise, contract, or implement any harvest of 
timber, except for noncommercial use, or noncommercial 
purposes in an emergency situation such as wildland fire-
fighting. Other projects may include any management ac-
tivity allowed by the Northwest Forest Plan. 
SEC. 6. PREPARATION OF PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRON-
MENTAL DOCUMENTATION. 
(a) NEPA DOCUMENTATION.—Based on the forest 
inventory required by section 4 for a Forest Service or 
Bureau of Land Management administrative unit, the ad-
ministrative unit may prepare programmatic environ-
mental documentation pursuant to the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) at 
the appropriate scale (District, watershed, or subwater-
shed) to study the significant environmental effects of the 
major Federal actions contemplated in projects authorized 
by section 5. 
(b) ELIMINATION OF REPETITIVE DISCUSSIONS OF 
ISSUES.—If programmatic environmental documentation 
is prepared under subsection (a), the Forest Service or 
Bureau of Land Management administrative unit may
eliminate repetitive discussions of the same issues and 
focus on the actual issues ripe for decision at subsequent 
levels of environmental review. Subsequent levels of envi-
ronmental review may tier to the programmatic environ-
mental document by summarizing the issues discussed in 
the broader statement and incorporate discussions from 
the broader statement by reference. 
SEC. 7. IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHOR-
IZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
(a) RELATION TO NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN.—This 
Act is intended to supplement the requirements of the 
Northwest Forest Plan. Except as provided in section 5, 
all projects on Westside Forest lands shall be planned and 
implemented in compliance with the Northwest Forest 
Plan and all other applicable laws. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 
are authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 for each 
fiscal year to plan and implement projects under section 
5. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this authorization 
of appropriation shall remain available until expended. 
This authorization of appropriations is in addition to any 
other authorization of appropriations for the Forest Serv-
ice or the Bureau of Land Management. 
(c) TREATMENT
OF
PROCEEDS
FROM
CERTAIN 
PROJECTS.—
being instrumental to the success of the United 
States in many battles during World War II. 
SEC. 102. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL. 
The Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
President Pro Tempore of the Senate shall make appro-
priate arrangements for the presentation, on behalf of the 
Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design, to each 
Sioux Code Talker, including the following: 
(1) Eddie Eagle Boy. 
(2) Simon Brokenleg. 
(3) Iver Crow Eagle, Sr. 
(4) Edmund St. John. 
(5) Walter C. John. 
(6) John Bear King. 
(7) Phillip ‘‘Stoney’’ LaBlanc. 
(8) Baptiste Pumpkinseed. 
(9) Guy Rondell. 
(10) Charles Whitepipe. 
(11) Clarence Wolfguts. 
TITLE II—COMANCHE CODE 
TALKERS 
SEC. 201. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1094
To authorize appropriations for part B of the Individuals with Disabilities 
Education Act to achieve full funding for part B of that Act by 2008. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 5, 2003
Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon (for herself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. 
GUTIERREZ, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. HILL, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. TERRY, Mrs. 
TAUSCHER, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 
Mr. SNYDER, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. REYES, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, 
Mr. CARSON
of Oklahoma, Mr. FILNER, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. 
MCDERMOTT, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. 
HONDA, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. BACA, Ms. LEE, Mr. HIN-
CHEY, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BEREUTER, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. MCGOV-
ERN, Mr. OWENS, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. FRANK of Mas-
sachusetts, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, 
and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce 
A BILL 
To authorize appropriations for part B of the Individuals 
with Disabilities Education Act to achieve full funding 
for part B of that Act by 2008.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following:
SEC. 6. EXPANSION OF COMMERCE SECURITY PROGRAMS. 
(a) CUSTOMS-TRADE PARTNERSHIP AGAINST TER-
RORISM.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commis-
sioner, in consultation with the Under Secretary, 
shall develop a plan to expand the size and scope 
(including personnel needs) of the Customs-Trade 
Partnership Against Terrorism programs along the 
northern border and southern border, including—
(A) the Business Anti-Smuggling Coali-
tion; 
(B) the Carrier Initiative Program; 
(C) the Americas Counter Smuggling Ini-
tiative; 
(D) the Container Security Initiative; 
(E) the Free and Secure Trade Initiative; 
and 
(F) other Industry Partnership Programs 
administered by the Commissioner. 
(2) SOUTHERN BORDER DEMONSTRATION PRO-
GRAM.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commissioner shall estab-
lish a demonstration program along the southern 
border for the purpose of implementing at least one 
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism pro-
(1) All children deserve a quality education, in-
cluding children with disabilities. 
(2) The Individuals with Disabilities Education 
Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) provides that the Fed-
eral Government and State and local governments 
are to share in the expense of educating children 
with disabilities and commits the Federal Govern-
ment to provide funds to assist with the excess ex-
penses of educating children with disabilities. 
(3) While Congress committed to contribute up 
to 40 percent of the average per pupil expenditure 
of educating children with disabilities, the Federal 
Government has failed to meet this commitment to 
assist States and localities. 
(4) To date, the Federal Government has never 
contributed more than 16.5 percent of the national 
average per pupil expenditure to assist with the ex-
cess expenses of educating children with disabilities 
under the Individuals with Disabilities Education 
Act. 
(5) Failing to meet the Federal Government’s 
commitment to assist with the excess expense of 
educating a child with a disability contradicts the 
goal of ensuring that children with disabilities re-
ceive a quality education.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR PART B 
OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES 
EDUCATION ACT. 
Section 611(j) of the Individuals with Disabilities 
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1412(j)), is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘there are authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary’’ and inserting ‘‘there are authorized 
to be appropriated the following amounts for the following 
fiscal years: 
‘‘(1) $10,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2004. 
‘‘(2) $12,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2005. 
‘‘(3) $15,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2006. 
‘‘(4) $18,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2007. 
‘‘(5) The amount that is equal to the sum of 
the maximum amount of the grant that each State 
may receive under this section, as determined under 
subsection (a)(2), for fiscal year 2008 and for each 
subsequent fiscal year’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1095
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reauthorize the State 
Criminal Alien Assistance Program. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 5, 2003
Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
reauthorize the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SCAAP REAUTHORIZED. 
Section 241(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)) is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (4)(A) to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(4)(A) In carrying out paragraph (1), the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security shall give priority to—
‘‘(i) Federal incarceration of undocu-
mented criminal aliens who have committed ag-
gravated felonies; and 
‘‘(ii) compensating States, and political 
subdivisions of States—
‘‘(I) located on a border of the United 
States with Canada or Mexico; or 
‘‘(II) having one of the fifth largest 
populations of aliens who are not author-
ized to be present in the United States.’’; 
and 
(2) by amending paragraph (5) to read as fol-
lows: 
‘‘(5) There are authorized to be appropriated 
such sums as may be necessary to carry out this 
subsection for each of fiscal years 2004 through 
2008.’’.
Æ
2680 
counterterrorism operations conducted by 
the United States Government.’’. 
ø(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of 
sections for the National Security Act of 1947 
is amended by inserting after the item relat-
ing to section 118 the following new item: 
ø‘‘Sec. 119. National counterterrorism Center.’’. 
øSEC. 1022. CIVIL LIBERTIES PROTECTION OFFICER. 
ø(a) CIVIL
LIBERTIES
PROTECTION
OFFI-
CER.—(1) Within the Office of the National In-
telligence Director, there is a Civil Liberties 
Protection Officer who shall be appointed by 
the National Intelligence Director. 
ø(2) The Civil Liberties Protection Officer 
shall report directly to the National Intel-
ligence Director. 
ø(b) DUTIES.—The Civil Liberties Protec-
tion Officer shall— 
ø(1) ensure that the protection of civil 
liberties and privacy is appropriately in-
corporated in the policies and procedures 
developed for and implemented by the 
Office of the National Intelligence Direc-
tor and the elements of the intelligence 
community within the National Intel-
ligence Program;