H. R. 2400—146
(2) INTERSTATE COMPACTS.—If 2 or more States enter into
a cooperative agreement under paragraph (1) with the Secretary
for the establishment of a multistate infrastructure bank, Con-
gress grants consent to those States to enter into an interstate
compact establishing the bank in accordance with this section.
(c) FUNDING.—
(1) CONTRIBUTION.—Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, the Secretary may allow, subject to subsection (h)(1),
a State that enters into a cooperative agreement under this
section to contribute to the infrastructure bank established
by the State not to exceed—
(A)(i) the total amount of funds apportioned to the
State under each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section
104(b) and section 144 of title 23, United States Code,
excluding funds set aside under paragraphs (1) and (2)
of section 133(d) of such title; and
(ii) the total amount of funds allocated to the State
under section 105 of such title;
(B) the total amount of funds made available to the
State or other Federal transit grant recipient for capital
projects (as defined in section 5302 of title 49, United
States Code) under sections 5307, 5309, and 5311 of such
title; and
(C) the total amount of funds made available to the
State under subtitle V of title 49, United States Code.
(2) CAPITALIZATION GRANT.—For the purposes of this sec-
tion, Federal funds contributed to the infrastructure bank under
this subsection shall constitute a capitalization grant for the
infrastructure bank.
(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR URBANIZED AREAS OF OVER 200,000.—
Funds that are apportioned or allocated to a State under section
104(b)(3) of title 23, United States Code, and attributed to
urbanized areas of a State with a population of over 200,000
individuals under section 133(d)(2) of such title may be used
to provide assistance from an infrastructure bank under this
section with respect to a project only if the metropolitan plan-
ning organization designated for the area concurs, in writing,
with the provision of the assistance.
(d) FORMS
OF ASSISTANCE FROM INFRASTRUCTURE BANKS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—An infrastructure bank established under
this section may make loans or provide other assistance to
a public or private entity in an amount equal to all or part
of the cost of carrying out a project eligible for assistance
under this section.
(2) SUBORDINATION OF LOANS.—The amount of any loan
or other assistance provided for the project may be subordinated
to any other debt financing for the project.
(3) INITIAL ASSISTANCE.—Initial assistance provided with
respect to a project from Federal funds contributed to an infra-
structure bank under this section shall not be made in the
form of a grant.
(e) QUALIFYING PROJECTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), funds in an
infrastructure bank established under this section may be used
only to provide assistance with respect to projects eligible for
assistance under title 23, United States Code, for capital
projects (as defined in section 5302 of title 49, United States
H. R. 2400—147
Code), or for any other project related to surface transportation
that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(2) INTERSTATE
FUNDS.—Funds contributed to an infra-
structure bank from funds apportioned to a State under section
104(b)(4) of title 23, United States Code, may be used only
to provide assistance with respect to projects eligible for assist-
ance under such paragraph.
(3) RAIL PROGRAM FUNDS.—Funds contributed to an infra-
structure bank from funds made available to a State under
subtitle V of title 49, United States Code, shall be used in
a manner consistent with any project description specified
under the law making the funds available to the State.
(f) INFRASTRUCTURE BANK REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in order to
establish an infrastructure bank under this section, each State
establishing such a bank shall—
(A) contribute, at a minimum, to the bank from non-
Federal sources an amount equal to 25 percent of the
amount of each capitalization grant made to the State
and contributed to the bank under subsection (c), except
that if the State has a higher Federal share payable under
section 120(b) of title 23, United States Code, the State
shall be required to contribute only an amount commensu-
rate with the higher Federal share;
(B) ensure that the bank maintains on a continuing
basis an investment grade rating on its debt issuances
and its ability to pay claims under credit enhancement
programs of the bank;
(C) ensure that investment income generated by funds
contributed to the bank will be—
(i) credited to the bank;
(ii) available for use in providing loans and other
assistance to projects eligible for assistance from the
bank; and
(iii) invested in United States Treasury securities,
bank deposits, or such other financing instruments
as the Secretary may approve to earn interest to
enhance the leveraging of projects assisted by the bank;
(D) ensure that any loan from the bank will bear
interest at or below market rates, as determined by the
State, to make the project that is the subject of the loan
feasible;
(E) ensure that repayment of the loan from the bank
will commence not later than 5 years after the project
has been completed or, in the case of a highway project,
the facility has opened to traffic, whichever is later;
(F) ensure that the term for repaying any loan will
not exceed the lesser of—
(i) 35 years after the date of the first payment
on the loan under subparagraph (E); or
(ii) the useful life of the investment; and
(G) require the bank to make a biennial report to
the Secretary and to make such other reports as the Sec-
retary may require in guidelines.
(2) WAIVERS BY THE SECRETARY.—The Secretary may waive
a requirement of any of subparagraphs (C) through (G) of
paragraph (1) with respect to an infrastructure bank if the
H. R. 2400—148
Secretary determines that the waiver is consistent with the
objectives of this section.
(g) LIMITATION ON REPAYMENTS.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the repayment of a loan or other assistance pro-
vided from an infrastructure bank under this section may not
be credited toward the non-Federal share of the cost of any project.
(h) SECRETARIAL REQUIREMENTS.—In administering this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall—
(1) ensure that Federal disbursements shall be at an annual
rate of not more than 20 percent of the amount designated
by the State for State infrastructure bank capitalization under
subsection (c)(1), except that the Secretary may disburse funds
to a State in an amount needed to finance a specific project;
and
(2) revise cooperative agreements entered into with States
under section 350 of the National Highway System Designation
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–59) to comply with this section.
(i) APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL LAW.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The requirements of titles 23 and 49,
United States Code, that would otherwise apply to funds made
available under such title and projects assisted with those
funds shall apply to—
(A) funds made available under such title and contrib-
uted to an infrastructure bank established under this sec-
tion, including the non-Federal contribution required under
subsection (f); and
(B) projects assisted by the bank through the use of
the funds;
except to the extent that the Secretary determines that any
requirement of such title (other than sections 113 and 114
of title 23 and section 5333 of title 49), is not consistent with
the objectives of this section.
(2) REPAYMENTS.—The requirements of titles 23 and 49,
United States Code, shall apply to repayments from non-Fed-
eral sources to an infrastructure bank from projects assisted
by the bank. Such a repayment shall be considered to be
Federal funds.
(j) UNITED STATES NOT OBLIGATED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The contribution of Federal funds to an
infrastructure bank established under this section shall not
be construed as a commitment, guarantee, or obligation on
the part of the United States to any third party. No third
party shall have any right against the United States for pay-
ment solely by virtue of the contribution.
(2) STATEMENT.—Any security or debt financing instrument
issued by the infrastructure bank shall expressly state that
the security or instrument does not constitute a commitment,
guarantee, or obligation of the United States.
(k) MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—Sections 3335 and 6503
of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply to funds contributed
under this section.
(l) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—A State may expend not to exceed 2
percent of the Federal funds contributed to an infrastructure
bank established by the State under this section to pay the
reasonable costs of administering the bank.
H. R. 2400—149
(2) NON-FEDERAL FUNDS.—The limitation described in para-
graph (1) shall not apply to non-Federal funds.
Subtitle F—High Priority Projects
SEC. 1601. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code,
is amended by striking section 117 and inserting the following:
‘‘§ 117. High priority projects program
‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS.—The Sec-
retary is authorized to carry out high priority projects with funds
made available to carry out the high priority projects program
under this section. Of amounts made available to carry out this
section, the Secretary, subject to subsection (b), shall make available
to carry out each project described in section 1602 of the Transpor-
tation Equity Act for the 21st Century the amount listed for such
project in such section. Any amounts made available to carry out
such program that are not allocated for projects described in such
section shall be available to the Secretary, subject to subsection
(b), to carry out such other high priority projects as the Secretary
determines appropriate.
‘‘(b) ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES.—For each project to be carried
out with funds made available to carry out the high priority projects
program under this section—
‘‘(1) 11 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 1998;
‘‘(2) 15 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 1999;
‘‘(3) 18 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 2000;
‘‘(4) 18 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 2001;
‘‘(5) 19 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 2002; and
‘‘(6) 19 percent of such amount shall be available for obliga-
tion beginning in fiscal year 2003.
‘‘(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable on account
of any project carried out with funds made available to carry out
this section shall be 80 percent of the total cost thereof.
‘‘(d) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provisions of this
title, the Secretary shall delegate responsibility for carrying out
a project or projects, with funds made available to carry out this
section, to the State in which such project or projects are located
upon request of such State.
‘‘(e) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which has been
delegated responsibility for a project under this section—
‘‘(1) has obligated all funds allocated under this section
and section 1602 of the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century for such project; and
‘‘(2) proceeds to construct such project without the aid
of Federal funds in accordance with all procedures and all
requirements applicable to such project, except insofar as such
procedures and requirements limit the State to the construction
of projects with the aid of Federal funds previously allocated
to it;
H. R. 2400—150
the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a State,
shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost of construction
of the project when additional funds are allocated for such project
under this section and section 1602 of the Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century.
‘‘(f) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds made available to carry
out this section shall remain available until expended.
‘‘(g) AVAILABILITY
OF
OBLIGATION
LIMITATION.—Obligation
authority attributable to funds made available to carry out this
section shall only be available for the purposes of this section
and shall remain available until obligated pursuant to section
1102(g) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century.
‘‘(h) TREATMENT.—Funds allocated to a State in accordance
with this section shall be treated as amounts in addition to the
amounts a State is apportioned under sections 104, 105, and 144
for programmatic purposes.’’.
(b) PURPOSE
OF
PROJECTS.—Section 145 of such title is
amended—
(1)
by
inserting
‘‘(a)
PROTECTION
OF
STATE
SOV-
EREIGNTY.—’’ before ‘‘The authorization’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(b) PURPOSE OF PROJECTS.—The projects described in section
1602 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, sections
1103 through 1108 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi-
ciency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2027 et seq.), and section 149(a)
of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance
Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 181 et seq.) are intended to establish eligi-
bility for Federal-aid highway funds made available for such projects
by section 1101(a)(13) of the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century, 117 of title 23, United States Code, sections 1103
through 1108 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act of 1991, and subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 149 of
the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act
of 1987, respectively, and are not intended to define the scope
or limits of Federal action in a manner inconsistent with subsection
(a).’’.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chapter 1 of
such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 117
and inserting the following:
‘‘117. High priority projects program.’’.
SEC. 1602. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
Subject to section 117 of title 23, United States Code, the
amount listed for each high priority project in the following table
shall be available (from amounts made available by section
1101(a)(13) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century)
for fiscal years 1998 through 2003 to carry out each such project:
H. R. 2400—151
No.
State
Project description
(Dollars in
millions)
1.
Georgia ..................
I–75 advanced transportation manage-
ment system in Cobb County ..................
1.275
2.
Ohio ........................
Relocate Washington Street/SR 149 within
Bellaire city limits in Belmont County ..
3.
Virginia ..................
Commuter and freight rail congestion and
mitigation project over Quantico Creek
7.5
4.
Michigan ................
Construct 
bike 
path 
between 
Mount
Clemens and New Baltimore ..................
3.75
5.
California ...............
Extend I–10 HOV lanes, Los Angeles ........
2.205
6.
Utah .......................
Reconstruct U.S. 89 and interchange at
200 North in Kaysville ............................
5.25
7.
Ohio ........................
Upgrade North Road between U.S. 422
and East Market Street, Trumbull
County .......................................................
1.2
8.
Tennessee ..............
Alternative transportation systems, Ruth-
erford .........................................................
5.1
9.
New York ...............
Improve Long Ridge Road from Pound
Ridge Road to Connecticut State line ....
1.4
10.
New York ...............
I–87 Noise Abatement Program .................
7.5
11.
California ...............
Upgrade access road to Mare Island ..........
0.75
12.
Texas ......................
Reconstruct FM 364 between Humble
Road and I–10, Beaumont .......................
3.6
13.
Washington ...........
Construct pedestrian access and safety on
Deception Pass Bridge, Deception Pass
State Park, Washington ..........................
14.
Ohio ........................
Conduct feasibility study for inclusion of
U.S. 22 as part of the Interstate System
0.1
15.
New York ...............
Improve Route 9 in Dutchess County ........
1.14
16.
California ...............
Reconstruct State Route 81 (Sierra Ave-
nue) and I–10 Interchange in Fontana ..
7.5
17.
New York ...............
Reconstruct Springfield Boulevard be-
tween the Long Island Rail main line
south to Rockaway Boulevard, Queens
County .......................................................
18.
Tennessee ..............
Reconstruction of U.S. 414 in Henderson
County .......................................................
3.75
19.
New Jersey ............
Upgrade Market Street/Essex Street and
Rochelle Avenue/Main Street to facili-
tate access to Routes 17 and 80, Bergen
County .......................................................
3.75
20.
Pennsylvania .........
U.S. 209 Marshall’s Creek Traffic Relief
project in Monroe County ........................
7.5
21.
Louisiana ...............
Replace ferry in Plaquemines Parish .........
1.6125
22.
Arkansas ................
Construct access routes between inter-
state highway, industrial park and
Slackwater Harbor, Little Rock ..............
0.75
23.
Georgia ..................
Reconstruct SR 26/U.S. 60 from Bull River
to Lazaretto Creek ...................................
2.6625
24.
California ...............
Improve SR 91/Green River Road inter-
change .......................................................
4.875
25.
Ohio ........................
Construct new bridge over Muskingum
River and highway approaches, Wash-
ington County ...........................................
1.5
26.
Virginia ..................
Widen Route 123 from Prince William
County line to State Route 645 in Fair-
fax County, Virginia ................................
7.5
27.
California ...............
Improve the interchange at Cabo and
Nason Street in Moreno Valley ...............
4.5
28.
Nevada ...................
Canamex Corridor Innovative Urban Ren-
ovation project in Henderson ..................
5.25
29.
California ...............
Construct bikeways, Santa Maria ..............
0.384
H. R. 2400—152
No.
State
Project description
(Dollars in
millions)
30.
Louisiana ...............
Expand Harding Road from Scenic High-
way to the Mississippi River and con-
struct an information center ...................
2.7
31.
Florida ...................
West Palm Beach Traffic Calming Project
on U.S. 1 and Flagur Drive .....................
11.25
32.
Oregon ...................
Construct bike path paralleling 42nd
Street to link with existing bike path,
Springfield ................................................
0.6
33.
Illinois ....................
Construct elevated walkway between Cen-
tre Station and arena ..............................
0.9
34.
Pennsylvania .........
Construct Ardmore Streetscape project .....
0.45
35.
California ...............
Construct San Diego and Arizona Eastern
Intermodal Yard, San Ysidro ..................
36.
New Jersey ............
Replace Clove Road bridge over tributary
of Mill Brook and Clove Brook in Sussex
County .......................................................
0.75
37.
Oregon ...................
Design and engineering for Newberg—
Dundee Bypass .........................................
0.375
38.
Ohio ........................
Upgrade U.S. Route 33 between vicinity of
Haydenville to Floodwood (Nelsonville
Bypass) ......................................................
3.75
39.
Connecticut ............
Revise interchange ramp on to Route 72
northbound from I–84 East in Plain-
ville, Connecticut .....................................
2.8125
40.
Alaska ....................
Construct 
Spruce 
Creek 
Bridge 
in
Soldotna ....................................................
0.2625
41.
New York ...............
Undertake studies, planning, engineering,
design and construction of a tunnel al-
ternative to reconstruction of existing
elevated expressway (Gowanus tunnel
project) ......................................................
42.
Virginia ..................
Reconstruct SR 168 (Battlefield Boule-
vard) in Chesapeake ................................
43.
Pennsylvania .........
Upgrade PA 228 (Crows Run Corridor) .....
5.4
44.
New York ...............
Upgrade and improve Saratoga to Albany
intermodal transportation corridor .........
12.2
45.
Pennsylvania .........
Widen Montgomery Alley and improve pe-
destrian and parking facilites in the vi-
cinity of the Falling Spring, Chambers-
burg ...........................................................
46.
Nebraska ...............
Corridor study for Plattsmouth Bridge
area to U.S. 75 and Horning Road .........
0.2625
47.
Pennsylvania .........
Construct SR 3019 over Great Trough
Creek in Huntingdon County ..................
0.375
48.
Pennsylvania .........
Improve PA 56 from I–99 to Somerset
County Line in Bedford County ..............
0.75
49.
Connecticut ............
Replace Windham Road bridge, Windham
1.5
50.
Tennessee ..............
Upgrade Briley Parkway between I–40
and Opryland ...........................................
4.2
51.
Pennsylvania .........
Renovate Harrisburg Transportation Cen-
ter in Dauphin County ............................
1.875
52.
Oregon ...................
Construct phase I: Highway 99 to Biddle
Road of the Highway 62 corridor solu-
tions project ..............................................
15.625
53.
Washington ...........
Construct traffic signals on U.S. 2 at Olds
Owens Road and 5th Street in Sultan,
Washington ...............................................
0.257
54.
New York ...............
Upgrade Route 17 between Five Mile
Point and Occanum, Broome County .....
12.6
H. R. 2400—153
No.
State
Project description
(Dollars in
millions)
55.
Texas ......................
Improve U.S. 82, East-West Freeway be-
tween Memphis Avenue and University
Avenue ......................................................
12.3
56.
Tennessee ..............
Construct Stones River Greenway, David-
son .............................................................
8.2
57.
Minnesota ..............
Conduct study of potential for diversion of
traffic from the I–35 corridor to com-
muter rail, Chicago County north of
Forest Lake along I–35 corridor to Rush
City ............................................................
0.375
58.
Minnesota ..............
Upgrade 10th Street South, Street Cloud
1.125
59.
Tennessee ..............
Improve State Road 95 from Westover
Drive to SR 62 in Roane and Anderson
Counties ....................................................
3.675
60.
California ...............
Construct Ontario International Airport
ground access program ............................
10.5
61.
Iowa .......................
Construct four-lane expressway between
Des Moines and Marshalltown ...............
7.5
62.
Texas ......................
Upgrade FM 225, Nacogdoches ..................
63.
Ohio ........................
Upgrade U.S. Route 35 between vicinity of
Chillicothe to Village of Richmond Dale
3.75
64.
Indiana ..................
Upgrade 93rd Avenue in Merrillville .........
4.425
65.
California ...............
Improve streets and construct bicycle
path, Westlake Village ............................
0.236
66.
Pennsylvania .........
Upgrade I–95 between Lehigh Avenue
and Columbia Avenue and improve-
ments to Girard Avenue/I–95 inter-
change, Philadelphia ................................
21.45
67.
Michigan ................
Construct I–96/Beck Wixom Road inter-
change .......................................................
1.95
68.
Pennsylvania .........
Construct I–95/Route 332 interchange ......
1.5
69.
California ...............
Improve streets and construct bicycle
path, Calabasas ........................................
0.75
70.
New York ...............
Construct Hutton Bridge Project ...............
71.
Ohio ........................
Restore Main and First Streets to two-
way traffic, Miamisburg ..........................
0.3375
72.
Virginia ..................
Widen I–64 Bland Boulevard interchange
25.8375
73.
Washington ...........
Widen Cook Road in Skagit County,
Washington ...............................................
3.1
74.
New York ...............
Construct interchange and connector road
using ITS testbed capabilities at I–90
Exit 8 ........................................................
8.775
75.
New York ...............
Construct 
Edgewater 
Road 
Dedicated
Truck Route ..............................................
76.
Illinois ....................
Upgrade Illinois 336 between Illinois 61 to
south of Loraine .......................................
3.825
77.
Michigan ................
Reconstruct Bagley Street and improve
Genschaw Road, Alpena ..........................
0.45
78.
California ...............
Construct Third Street South Bay Basin
Bridge, San Francisco ..............................
9.375
79.
New Mexico ...........
Improve I–25 at Raton Pass .......................
80.
Pennsylvania .........
Construct Mon-Fayette Expressway be-
tween Union Town and Brownsville ......
81.
Michigan ................
Upgrade Hill Road corridor between I–75
to Dort Highway, Genesee County .........
2.25
82.
Georgia ..................
Improve GA 316 in Gwinnett County ........
30.675
83.
North Carolina ......
Construct segment of new freeway, includ-
ing right-of-way acquisition, between
East of U.S. 401 to I–95, and bridge
over Cape Fear River ...............................
H. R. 2400—154
No.
State
Project description
(Dollars in
millions)
84.
Florida ...................
Construct U.S. 98/Thomas Drive inter-
change .......................................................
8.25
85.
Illinois ....................
Construct I–64/North Greenmount Road
interchange, St. Clair County .................
3.6
86.
South Carolina ......
Three River Greenway Project to and from
Gervals Street in Columbia .....................
3.75
87.
New York ...............
Upgrade Chenango County Route 32 in
Norwich .....................................................
1.6
88.
Maine .....................
Construct I–95/Stillwater Avenue inter-
change .......................................................
1.5
89.
Massachusetts .......
Construct I–495/Route 2 interchange east
of existing interchange to provide access
to commuter rail station, Littleton .........
3.15
90.
Connecticut ............
Construct 
Seaview 
Avenue 
Corridor
project .......................................................
2.5
91.
Texas ......................
Construct transportation improvements as
part of redevelopment of Kelly AFB,
San Antonio ..............................................
3.75
92.
Texas ......................
Conduct pipeline express study through
Texas Transportation Institute (A&M
University) ................................................
1.125
93.
Illinois ....................
Undertake 
improvements 
to 
Campus
Transportation System, Chicago .............
1.5
94.
Pennsylvania .........
Improve walking and biking trails be-
tween Easton and Lehigh Gorge State
Park within the Delaware and Lehigh
Canal National Heritage Corridor ..........
2.1
95.
Michigan ................
Upgrade and make improvements to the
Walton Corridor project including seg-
ments of Walton Boulevard, Baldwin
and Joslyn Roads, and Telegraph Road
10.5
96.
North Carolina ......
Construct Charlotte Western Outer Loop
freeway, Mecklenburg County ................
97.
Tennessee ..............
Reconstruct U.S. 79 between Milan and
McKenzie ..................................................
98.
Virginia ..................
Undertake access improvements for Free-
mason Harbor Development Initiative,
Norfolk ......................................................
1.5
99.
Pennsylvania .........
Upgrade U.S. Route 119 between Homer
City and Blairsville ..................................
3.05
100.
Minnesota ..............
Construct pedestrian bridge over TH 169
in Elk River ..............................................
0.53025
101.
Georgia ..................
Construct Athens to Atlanta Transpor-
tation Corridor .........................................
102.
Alabama .................
Initiate construction on controlled access
highway between the Eastern edge of
Madison County and Mississippi State
line ............................................................
103.
Texas ......................
Construct improvments along U.S. 69 in-
cluding frontage roads, Jefferson Coun-
ty ...............................................................
5.76
104.
New York ...............
Rehabilitate Broadway Bridge, New York
City ............................................................
1.5
105.
Ohio ........................
Reconstruct Morgan County 37 in Morgan
County .......................................................
0.4
106.
California ...............
Improve 
Mission 
Boulevard 
in 
San
Bernardino, California .............................
0.5
107.
Indiana ..................
Widen 116th Street in Carmel ...................
1.125
108.
Illinois ....................
Undertake traffic mitigation and circula-
tion enhancements, 57th and Lake
Shore Drive ...............................................