datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2728
To authorize a program of grants to States to improve the use of technology
in elementary and secondary schools.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 23, 1993
Mr. SAWYER (for himself and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To authorize a program of grants to States to improve
the use of technology in elementary and secondary schools.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘Technology Education Assistance Act of 1993’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of
this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title, table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings.
Sec. 3. Statement of Purpose.
Sec. 4. Definitions.
TITLE I—STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY GRANTS
Sec. 101. In-State Apportionment.
H. R. 2056 
One Hundred Twelfth Congress 
of the 
United States of America 
AT THE FIRST SESSION 
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 
the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 
An Act 
To instruct the Inspector General of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
to study the impact of insured depository institution failures, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL STUDY. 
(a) STUDY.—The Inspector General of the Federal Deposit Insur-
ance Corporation (FDIC) shall conduct a comprehensive study on 
the impact of the failure of insured depository institutions. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act— 
(1) the term ‘‘insured depository institution’’ has the 
meaning given such term in section 3(c) of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)); and 
(2) the term ‘‘private equity company’’ has the meaning 
given the terms ‘‘hedge fund’’ and ‘‘private equity fund’’ in 
section 13(h)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 
(12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(2)). 
(c) MATTERS TO BE STUDIED.—In conducting the study under 
this section, the Inspector General shall address the following: 
(1) LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENTS.—The effect of loss-sharing 
agreements (LSAs), including— 
(A) the impact of loss-sharing on the insured depository 
institutions that survive and the borrowers of insured 
depository institutions that fail, including— 
(i) the impact on the rate of loan modifications 
and adjustments; 
(ii) whether more types of loans (such as commer-
cial (including land development and 1- to 4-family 
residential and commercial construction loans), resi-
dential, or small business loans) could be modified 
with fewer LSAs, or if LSAs could be phased out 
altogether; 
(iii) the FDIC’s policies and procedures for moni-
toring LSAs, including those designed to ensure institu-
tions are not imprudently selling assets at a depressed 
value; 
(iv) the impact on the availability of credit; and 
(v) the impact on loans with participation agree-
ments outstanding with other insured depository 
institutions; 
(B) the FDIC’s policies and procedures for terminating 
LSAs and mitigating the risk of acquiring institutions 
having substantial assets remaining in their portfolio when 
the LSAs are due to expire;
(B) whether there is any difference in im-
plementation between residential workouts and 
commercial workouts. 
(4) ORDERS.—The application and impact of 
consent orders and cease and desist orders, includ-
ing— 
(A) whether such orders have been applied 
uniformly and fairly across all insured deposi-
tory institutions; 
(B) the reasons for failing to apply such 
orders uniformly and fairly when such failure 
occurs; 
(C) the impact of such orders on the abil-
ity of insured depository institutions to raise 
capital; 
(D) the impact of such orders on the abil-
ity of insured depository institutions to extend 
credit to existing and new borrowers; 
(E) whether individual insured depository 
institutions have improved enough to have such 
orders removed; and 
(F) the reasons for failure where insured 
depository institutions have not so improved. 
(5) FDIC POLICY.—The application and impact 
of FDIC policies, including— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
07:04 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2056.IH
H2056
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2057 
To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary cities, 
and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 31, 2011 
Mr. BARLETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 
and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall with-
in the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by 
sanctuary cities, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobilizing Against 
Sanctuary Cities Act of 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. SANCTUARY CITIES INELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL FI-
NANCIAL ASSISTANCE. 
Any State or local government that violates section 
642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Re-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:13 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2057.IH
H2057
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
sponsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373) may not receive 
any Federal financial assistance (as such term is defined 
in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, United States Code). The 
Attorney General shall determine annually which State or 
local jurisdictions are not in compliance with section 642 
of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Respon-
sibility Act and shall report such determinations to Con-
gress on March 1 of each year. The Attorney General shall 
also issue a report concerning the compliance of any par-
ticular State or local jurisdiction at the request of any 
Member of Congress. Any jurisdiction that is found to be 
out of compliance shall be ineligible to receive Federal fi-
nancial assistance for a minimum period of one year, and 
shall only become eligible again after the Attorney General 
certifies that the jurisdiction is in compliance. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:13 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2057.IH
H2057
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2059 
To prohibit funding to the United Nations Population Fund. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 31, 2011 
Mrs. ELLMERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs 
A BILL 
To prohibit funding to the United Nations Population Fund. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING TO UNITED NA-
TIONS POPULATION FUND. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec-
retary of State may not make a contribution to the United 
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:19 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2059.IH
H2059
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IB 
Union Calendar No. 246 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2059 
[Report No. 112–361] 
To prohibit funding to the United Nations Population Fund. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 31, 2011 
Mrs. ELLMERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs 
JANUARY 17, 2012 
Additional sponsors: Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. JONES, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 
Ms. FOXX, Mr. BONNER, Mr. CARTER, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. MARINO, 
Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. 
COBLE, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, 
Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. 
MARCHANT, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. 
MCKINLEY, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. 
BENISHEK, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. QUAYLE, Mr. 
SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. CRAVAACK, Mr. BACHUS, 
Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. KELLY, 
Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. ROSS of Florida, 
Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. NUNNELEE, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. KING of New 
York, Mr. LATTA, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. KING of 
Iowa, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. PENCE, Mr. KLINE, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 
PALAZZO, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. POSEY, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 
RIVERA, Mr. ROSKAM, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 
CASSIDY, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. FORBES, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. DUNCAN of 
South Carolina, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. AUSTRIA, Mr. TUR-
NER of New York, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. MURPHY 
of Pennsylvania, Mrs. MCMORRIS
RODGERS, Ms. BUERKLE, Mr. 
BARLETTA, Mr. WALSH of Illinois, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. MULVANEY, 
Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. 
DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mrs. ADAMS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 
CHABOT, Mr. FLORES, Mr. MACK, Mr. RIGELL, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkan-
sas, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. SUL-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:16 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2059.RH
H2059
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(I) a hearing that is on the 
record; and 
‘‘(II) a reasonable opportunity to 
cure the alleged violation. 
‘‘(9) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this sub-
section shall affect subsection (e) or any tribal regu-
lations issued under that subsection.’’. 
SEC. 3. LAND TITLE REPORTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Bureau of Indian Affairs 
shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Natural Re-
sources of the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Indian Affairs of the Senate a report regarding 
the history and experience of Indian tribes that have cho-
sen to assume responsibility for operating the Indian Land 
Title and Records Office (referred to in this section as 
the ‘‘LTRO’’) functions from the Bureau of Indian Af-
fairs. 
(b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the review under 
subsection (a), the Bureau of Indian Affairs shall consult 
with the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
Office of Native American Programs and the Indian tribes 
that are managing LTRO functions (referred to in this 
section as the ‘‘managing Indian tribes’’). 
(c) CONTENTS.—The review under subsection (a) 
shall include an analysis of the following factors:
LIVAN, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. 
GOSAR, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. LONG, Mr. YODER, and Mr. 
WITTMAN 
JANUARY 17, 2012 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
and ordered to be printed 
A BILL 
To prohibit funding to the United Nations Population Fund. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:16 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2059.RH
H2059
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING TO UNITED NA-
TIONS POPULATION FUND. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec-
retary of State may not make a contribution to the United 
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:16 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2059.RH
H2059
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 246 
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2059 
[Report No. 112–361] 
A BILL 
To prohibit funding to the United Nations 
Population Fund. 
JANUARY 17, 2012 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:16 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H2059.RH
H2059
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
112TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 205 
AN ACT 
To amend the Act titled ‘‘An Act to authorize the leasing 
of restricted Indian lands for public, religious, edu-
cational, recreational, residential, business, and other 
purposes requiring the grant of long-term leases’’, ap-
proved August 9, 1955, to provide for Indian tribes 
to enter into certain leases without prior express approval 
from the Secretary of the Interior, and for other pur-
poses.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Expedite and 
Advance Responsible Tribal Home Ownership Act of 
2012’’ or the ‘‘HEARTH Act of 2012’’. 
SEC. 2. APPROVAL OF, AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO, 
TRIBAL LEASES. 
The first section of the Act titled ‘‘An Act to author-
ize the leasing of restricted Indian lands for public, reli-
gious, educational, recreational, residential, business, and 
other purposes requiring the grant of long-term leases’’, 
approved August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415), is amended 
as follows: 
(1) In subsection (d)— 
(A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘the 
Navajo Nation’’ and inserting ‘‘an applicable 
Indian tribe’’; 
(B) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘the 
Navajo Nation’’ and inserting ‘‘an Indian 
tribe’’; 
(C) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ 
after the semicolon at the end; 
(D) in paragraph (8)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘the Navajo Nation’’;
(ii) by striking ‘‘with Navajo Nation 
law’’ and inserting ‘‘with applicable tribal 
law’’; and 
(iii) by striking the period at the end 
and inserting a semicolon; and 
(E) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(9) the term ‘Indian tribe’ has the meaning 
given such term in section 102 of the Federally Rec-
ognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 
479a); and 
‘‘(10) the term ‘individually owned allotted 
land’ means a parcel of land that— 
‘‘(A)(i) is located within the jurisdiction of 
an Indian tribe; or 
‘‘(ii) is held in trust or restricted status by 
the United States for the benefit of an Indian 
tribe or a member of an Indian tribe; and 
‘‘(B) is allotted to a member of an Indian 
tribe.’’. 
(2) By adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(h) TRIBAL APPROVAL OF LEASES.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—At the discretion of any In-
dian tribe, any lease by the Indian tribe for the pur-
poses authorized under subsection (a) (including any 
amendments to subsection (a)), except a lease for
agency under section 155(c) for the second through fifth
years only if—
(1)(A) the Secretary has approved the State’s
improvement plan under section 156(l); or
(B) the Secretary determines that the State has
made substantial progress in developing such plan;
and
(2) such application meets the other require-
ments of this title.
(c) PAYMENTS.—For any fiscal year for which a State
has an approved application under this title, the Secretary
shall make a grant to the State educational agency in the
amount determined under section 154(b).
SEC. 158. STATE USE OF FUNDS.
(a) FIRST YEAR.—In the first year for which a State
educational agency receives a grant under this title, the
State—
(1) shall use at least 75 percent of such funds to
make subgrants, in accordance with section 159(a), to
local educational agencies for the development or im-
plementation of local improvement plans and to make
subgrants, in accordance with section 159(b), to im-
prove educator preservice programs and for profes-
sional development activities consistent with the State
plan, if the amount allocated to States under section
owned within the district, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall provide the certification provided for in subsection 
(b)(1) of section 213 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 
1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm(b)(1)). 
(c) CONTRACT AMENDMENT.—On approval of the 
district directors and notwithstanding project authorizing 
legislation to the contrary, the district’s reclamation con-
tracts are modified, without further action by the Sec-
retary of the Interior, to— 
(1) authorize the use of water for instream pur-
poses, including fish or wildlife purposes, in order 
for the district to engage in, or take advantage of, 
conserved water projects and temporary instream 
leasing as authorized by Oregon State law; 
(2) include within the district boundary ap-
proximately 2,742 acres in the vicinity of McKay 
Creek, resulting in a total of approximately 44,937 
acres within the district boundary; 
(3) classify as irrigable approximately 685 acres 
within the approximately 2,742 acres of included 
lands in the vicinity of McKay Creek, where the ap-
proximately 685 acres are authorized to receive irri-
gation water pursuant to water rights issued by the 
State of Oregon and have in the past received water 
pursuant to such State water rights; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:20 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2060.IH
H2060
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
125
(III) includes methods for estab-
lishing that the assessment and certifi-
cation system is not discriminatory
with respect to race, color, gender, age,
religion, ethnicity, disability, or na-
tional origin, consistent with Federal
civil rights laws.
(iii) A system to promote the use of
and to disseminate information relating to
skill standards, and assessment and certifi-
cation systems developed pursuant to this
paragraph (including dissemination of in-
formation relating to civil rights laws rel-
evant to the use of such standards and sys-
tems) to entities such as institutions of post-
secondary education offering professional
and technical education, labor organiza-
tions, trade associations, employers provid-
ing formalized training and other organiza-
tions likely to benefit from such systems.
(iv) A system to evaluate the imple-
mentation of the skill standards, and assess-
ment and certification systems developed
pursuant to this paragraph, and the effec-
tiveness of the information disseminated
(4) provide the district with stored water from 
Prineville Reservoir for purposes of supplying the 
approximately 685 acres of lands added within the 
district boundary under paragraph (2). 
(d) LIMITATION.—Except as otherwise provided in 
subsections (a) and (c), nothing in this section shall be 
construed to— 
(1) modify contractual rights that may exist be-
tween the District and the United States under the 
District’s Reclamation contracts; 
(2) amend or reopen the contracts referred to 
in paragraph (1); or 
(3) modify any rights, obligations or relation-
ships that may exist between the District and its 
landowners as may be provided or governed by Or-
egon State law. 
Æ 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:20 Jun 03, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2060.IH
H2060
pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS