1519 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
the W88 Alt 370 program that contains analyses of the 
costs, benefits, risks, and feasibility of each of the following 
options: 
(1) Incorporating a refresh of the conventional 
high explosives of the W88 warhead as part of such 
program. 
(2) Not incorporating such a refresh as part of 
such program. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection 
(a) shall include, for each option described in paragraphs 
(1) and (2) of subsection (a), an analysis of the following: 
(1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, in-
cluding costs to both the Navy and the National Nu-
clear Security Administration. 
(2) Potential cost avoidance. 
(3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the ca-
pacity and throughput of the nuclear security enter-
prise (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic En-
ergy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration. 
(4) The expected longevity of the W88 warhead. 
(5) Near-term and long-term safety and security 
risks and potential risk-mitigation measures.
1520 
(6) Any other matters the Secretary, the Admin-
istrator, or the Chairman considers appropriate. 
SEC. 3132. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND SENSE 
OF CONGRESS WITH RESPECT TO PLUTONIUM 
STRATEGY. 
(a) ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nu-
clear Security shall include, as part of the Administrator’s 
planned analysis of alternatives to support the plutonium 
strategy of the National Nuclear Security Administration, 
an analysis of using or modifying existing facilities of the 
nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002 of 
the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) to sup-
port that strategy, as part of critical decision 1 in the ac-
quisition process for the design and construction of modular 
structures associated with operations of the PF–4 facility 
at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mex-
ico. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The analysis required by 
subsection (a) shall include an analysis of the following: 
(1) The costs, benefits, cost savings, risks, and ef-
fects of using or modifying existing facilities of the 
nuclear security enterprise to support the plutonium 
strategy of the Administration. 
(2) Such other matters as the Administrator con-
siders appropriate.
1521 
(c) SUBMISSION.—The Administrator shall submit the 
analysis required by subsection (a) to the congressional de-
fense committees not later than 30 days after completing 
the analysis. 
(d) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that the requirement to create a modern, responsive pluto-
nium infrastructure is a national security priority, and 
that the Administrator must fulfill the obligations of the 
Administrator under section 3114(c) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (50 U.S.C. 
2535 note), as well as the commitment made by the Chair-
man of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by section 
179 of title 10, United States Code) in the letter of the 
Chairman, dated July 25, 2014, to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives, to carry out a modular building strategy for pluto-
nium capabilities that— 
(1) meets the requirements for maintaining the 
nuclear weapons stockpile over a 30-year period; 
(2) meets the requirements for implementation of 
a responsive infrastructure, including meeting pluto-
nium pit production requirements; and 
(3) includes plans to construct two modular 
structures that will achieve full operating capability 
not later than 2027.
1522 
SEC. 3133. PLAN FOR VERIFICATION AND MONITORING OF 
PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND 
FISSILE MATERIAL. 
(a) PLAN.—The President, in consultation with the 
Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary 
of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Di-
rector of National Intelligence, shall develop an interagency 
plan for verification and monitoring relating to the poten-
tial proliferation of nuclear weapons, components of such 
weapons, and fissile material. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The plan developed under subsection 
(a) shall include the following: 
(1) An interagency plan and road map for 
verification and monitoring, with respect to policy, 
operations, and research, development, testing, and 
evaluation, including— 
(A) identifying requirements (including 
funding requirements) for such verification and 
monitoring; and 
(B) identifying and integrating roles, re-
sponsibilities, and planning for such verification 
and monitoring. 
(2) An engagement plan for building cooperation 
and transparency to improve inspections and moni-
toring. 
(3) A research and development program to—
1523 
(A) improve monitoring, detection, and in- 
field inspection and analysis capabilities, in-
cluding persistent surveillance, remote moni-
toring, and rapid analysis of large data sets, in-
cluding open-source data; and 
(B) coordinate technical and operational re-
quirements early in the process. 
(4) Engagement of relevant departments and 
agencies of the Federal Government and the military 
departments (including the Open Source Center and 
the United States Atomic Energy Detection System), 
national laboratories, industry, and academia. 
(c) SUBMISSION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 1, 
2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees the plan developed under 
subsection (a). 
(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES 
DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate 
congressional committees’’ means the following: 
(A) The congressional defense committees. 
(B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of 
the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
1524 
(C) The Committee on Foreign Relations of 
the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
of the House of Representatives. 
(D) The Committee on Homeland Security 
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the 
Committee on Homeland Security of the House 
of Representatives. 
(E) The Committee on Commerce, Science, 
and Transportation of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives. 
SEC. 3134. COMMENTS OF ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR 
SECURITY 
AND 
CHAIRMAN 
OF 
NUCLEAR 
WEAPONS COUNCIL ON FINAL REPORT OF 
CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY PANEL ON THE 
GOVERNANCE OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY 
ENTERPRISE. 
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the 
Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by 
section 179 of title 10, United States Code) shall each sub-
mit to the congressional defense committees the comments 
of the Administrator or the Chairman, as the case may be, 
with respect to the findings, conclusions, and recommenda-
tions included in the final report of the Congressional Advi-