195 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) 
and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); 
and 
(2) by striking subsection (c). 
(c) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) is amend-
ed— 
(1) in subsection (d)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Not-
withstanding the requirements of subsection (c), 
the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘subsections (a) and (c)’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘subsection 
(a)’’; and 
(C) by striking paragraph (4); and 
(2) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating 
subsections (d) through (g) as subsections (c) 
through (f), respectively. 
(d) Section 6003 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 579c), and the item 
relating to such section in the table of contents, are re-
pealed. 
(e) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 579d), and the item relating 
to such section in the table of contents, are repealed.
196 
(f) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 579c–1), and the item relat-
ing to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. 
(g) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 579d–1), and the item relat-
ing to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. 
(h) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 579c–2), and the item relat-
ing to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. 
TITLE IV—WATER RESOURCES 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The following projects for water resources develop-
ment and conservation and other purposes, as identified 
in the reports titled ‘‘Report to Congress on Future Water 
Resources Development’’ submitted to Congress pursuant 
to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Devel-
opment Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise re-
viewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by 
the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, 
and subject to the conditions, described in the respective 
reports or decision documents designated in this section: 
(1) NAVIGATION.—
197 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. AK 
Port of Nome 
Modifications 
May 29, 
2020 
Federal: $368,173,000 
Non-Federal: $122,746,000 
Total: $490,919,000 
2. AK 
Unalaska (Dutch 
Harbor) Chan-
nels 
February 7, 
2020 
Federal: $26,202,750 
Non-Federal: $8,734,250 
Total: $34,937,000 
3. CT 
New Haven Har-
bor Navigation 
Improvement 
Project 
May 7, 2020 
Federal: $53,489,000 
Non-Federal: $18,822,000 
Total: $72,311,000 
4. NY, 
NJ 
New York and 
New Jersey 
Harbor Anchor-
ages 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $18,940,000 
Non-Federal: $6,310,000 
Total: $25,250,000 
5. TX 
Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway, 
Brazos River 
Floodgates and 
Colorado River 
Locks 
October 23, 
2019 
Total: $409,777,000, to be 
derived 1⁄2 from the gen-
eral fund of the Treasury 
and 1⁄2 from the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund. 
6. TX 
Houston Ship 
Channel Expan-
sion Channel 
Improvement 
Project, Harris, 
Chambers, and 
Galveston 
Counties 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $462,803,000 
Non-Federal: $414,045,000 
Total: $876,848,000 
7. TX 
Matagorda Ship 
Channel Im-
provement 
Project, Port 
Lavaca 
November 
15, 2019 
Federal: $138,660,000 
Non-Federal: $79,664,000 
Total: $218,324,000 
(2) FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT.—
198 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. AZ 
Little Colorado 
River at Wins-
low, Navajo 
County 
December 
14, 2018 
Federal: $52,462,000 
Non-Federal: $28,249,000 
Total: $80,711,000 
2. CA 
Westminster, East 
Garden Grove, 
California Flood 
Risk Manage-
ment 
July 9, 2020 
Federal: $314,506,000 
Non-Federal: $910,092,000 
Total: $1,224,598,000 
3. CT, 
NY 
Westchester Coun-
ty Streams, 
Byram River 
Basin, Fairfield 
County, Con-
necticut, and 
Westchester 
County, New 
York 
May 7, 2020 
Federal: $14,702,500 
Non-Federal: $14,702,500 
Total: $29,405,000 
4. ND 
Souris River 
Basin Flood 
Risk Manage-
ment 
April 16, 
2019 
Federal: $58,041,750 
Non-Federal: $31,253,250 
Total: $89,295,000 
5. NJ 
Peckman River 
Basin 
April 29, 
2020 
Federal: $95,022,000 
Non-Federal: $51,166,000 
Total: $146,188,000 
6. NM 
Middle Rio 
Grande Flood 
Protection, 
Bernalillo to 
Belen 
March 13, 
2020 
Federal: $190,538,000 
Non-Federal: $102,598,000 
Total: $293,136,000 
7. OK 
Tulsa and West- 
Tulsa Levee 
System, Tulsa 
County 
April 23, 
2020 
Federal: $86,780,000 
Non-Federal: $46,728,000 
Total: $133,508,000 
(3) HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK RE-
DUCTION.—
199 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. DE 
Delaware Bene-
ficial Use of 
Dredged Mate-
rial for the 
Delaware River 
March 6, 
2020 
Initial Federal: $53,220,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$28,660,000 
Total: $81,880,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$116,380,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$116,380,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$232,760,000 
2. NJ 
New Jersey Bene-
ficial Use of 
Dredged Mate-
rial for the 
Delaware River 
April 8, 
2020 
Initial Federal: $80,780,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$43,500,000 
Total: $124,280,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$82,140,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$82,140,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$164,280,000 
3. NJ 
Rahway River 
Basin, New 
Jersey Coastal 
Storm Risk 
Management 
June 9, 
2020 
Federal: $46,754,000 
Non-Federal: $25,175,000 
Total: $71,929,000 
4. NY 
East Rockaway 
Inlet to Rock-
away Inlet and 
Jamaica Bay, 
Atlantic Coast 
of New York 
August 22, 
2019 
Initial Federal: $604,203,000 
Initial Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $604,203,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$189,763,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$189,763,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$379,526,000 
5. NY 
Hashamomuck 
Cove Coastal 
Storm Risk 
Management 
December 9, 
2019 
Initial Federal: $11,549,000 
Initial Non-Federal: 
$6,218,000 
Total: $17,767,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$23,481,500 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$23,481,500 
Renourishment Total: 
$46,963,000
200 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
6. RI 
Pawcatuck River 
Coastal Storm 
Risk Manage-
ment Project 
December 
19, 2018 
Federal: $37,848,000 
Non-Federal: $20,379,000 
Total: $58,227,000 
7. VA 
Norfolk Coastal 
Storm Risk 
Management 
February 5, 
2019 
Federal: $909,040,000 
Non-Federal: $489,480,000 
Total: $1,398,520,000 
(4) FLOOD
RISK
MANAGEMENT
AND
ECO-
SYSTEM RESTORATION.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CO 
South Platte 
River and Trib-
utaries, Adams 
and Denver 
Counties 
July 29, 
2019 
Federal: $334,412,000 
Non-Federal: $200,406,000 
Total: $534,818,000 
2. NY 
Fire Island Inlet 
to Montauk 
Point, New 
York Reformu-
lation 
July 9, 2020 
Initial Federal: 
$1,541,981,000 
Initial Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $1,541,981,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$742,926,500 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$742,926,500 
Renourishment Total: 
$1,485,853,000 
(5) ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.—
201 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. CA 
Delta Islands and 
Levees 
December 
18, 2018 
Federal: $16,746,395 
Non-Federal: $9,016,736 
Total: $25,763,131 
2. CA 
Yuba River Eco-
system Restora-
tion 
June 20, 
2019 
Federal: $65,014,326 
Non-Federal: $35,008,268 
Total: $100,022,594 
3. FL 
Comprehensive 
Everglades Res-
toration Plan, 
Loxahatchee 
River Water-
shed Restora-
tion Project, 
Martin and 
Palm Beach 
Counties 
April 8, 
2020 
Federal: $372,232,000 
Non-Federal: $368,528,000 
Total: $740,760,000 
4. IL 
The Great Lakes 
and Mississippi 
River Interbasin 
Study - Bran-
don Road, Will 
County 
May 23, 
2019 
Federal: $690,643,200 
Non-Federal: $172,660,800 
Total: $863,304,000 
5. IL 
South Fork of the 
South Branch 
of the Chicago 
River, Bubbly 
Creek, Eco-
system Restora-
tion 
July 9, 2020 
Federal: $11,657,000 
Non-Federal: $6,277,000 
Total: $17,934,000 
6. MD 
Anacostia Water-
shed Restora-
tion, Prince 
George’s Coun-
ty 
December 
19, 2018 
Federal: $23,171,000 
Non-Federal: $12,476,000 
Total: $35,647,000 
7. MO 
St. Louis 
Riverfront- 
Meramec River 
Basin Eco-
system Restora-
tion 
November 1, 
2019 
Federal: $60,124,000 
Non-Federal: $32,375,000 
Total: $92,499,000
202 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
8. NM 
Rio Grande, Envi-
ronmental Man-
agement Pro-
gram, Sandia 
Pueblo to Isleta 
Pueblo, New 
Mexico Eco-
system Restora-
tion 
August 5, 
2019 
Federal: $16,163,000 
Non-Federal: $8,703,000 
Total: $24,866,000 
9. NY, 
NJ 
Hudson-Raritan 
Estuary Eco-
system Restora-
tion 
May 26, 
2020 
Federal: $265,320,000 
Non-Federal: $142,864,000 
Total: $408,184,000 
10. TX 
Jefferson County 
Ecosystem Res-
toration 
September 
12, 2019 
Federal: $37,615,000 
Non-Federal: $20,254,000 
Total: $57,869,000 
(6) WATER SUPPLY.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Report of 
Chief of 
Engineers 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. OR 
Willamette River 
Basin Review 
Reallocation, 
December 
18, 2019 
Federal: $0 
Non-Federal: $0 
Total: $0 
(7) MODIFICATIONS AND OTHER PROJECTS.— 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
1. FL 
Caloosahatchee 
River West 
Basin Storage 
Reservoir (C-43 
WBSR) 
July 24, 
2020 
Federal: $503,466,500 
Non-Federal: $503,466,500 
Total: $1,006,933,000
203 
A. 
State 
B. 
Name 
C. 
Date of 
Decision 
Document 
D. 
Estimated 
Costs 
2. KY 
Kentucky Lock 
June 9, 
2020 
Total: $1,152,769,000 (to be 
derived 1⁄2 from the gen-
eral fund of the Treasury 
and 1⁄2 from the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund) 
3. NC 
Carolina Beach 
Integrated 
Beach Re-
nourishment 
June 16, 
2020 
Federal: $24,205,000 
Non-Federal: $24,205,000 
Total: $48,410,000 
4. NC 
Wrightsville 
Beach 
July 2, 2020 
Federal: $53,788,000 
Non-Federal: $22,329,000 
Total: $76,117,000 
Renourishment Federal: 
$14,553,000 
Renourishment Non-Federal: 
$14,553,000 
Renourishment Total: 
$29,106,000 
5. TX 
Corpus Christi 
Ship Channel, 
Deepening and 
Widening and 
Barge Shelves 
May 4, 2020 
Federal: $403,000,000 
Non-Federal: $273,010,000 
Total: $676,010,000 
SEC. 402. SPECIAL RULES. 
(a) 
GREAT
LAKES
AND
MISSISSIPPI
RIVER 
INTERBASIN PROJECT, BRANDON ROAD, WILL COUNTY, 
ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
ecosystem restoration, Great Lakes and Mississippi River 
Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois, 
authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially in ac-
cordance with the terms and conditions described in the 
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 23, 2019, 
with the following modifications:
204 
(1) The Federal share of the cost of construc-
tion shall be 80 percent. 
(2) The Secretary may include the addition or 
substitution of technologies or measures not de-
scribed in the report, as the Secretary determines to 
be advisable. 
(b) WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN REVIEW REALLOCA-
TION STUDY.—The Secretary shall carry out the project 
for water supply, Willamette River Basin Review Realloca-
tion, Oregon, authorized by section 401 of this Act, sub-
stantially in accordance with the terms and conditions de-
scribed in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated De-
cember 18, 2019, with the following modifications: 
(1) The Secretary shall meet the obligations of 
the Corps of Engineers under the Endangered Spe-
cies Act of 1973 by complying with the June 2019 
NMFS Willamette Basin Review Study Biological 
Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative until 
such time, if any, as it is modified or replaced, in 
whole or in part, through the consultation process 
under section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973. 
(2) The Secretary may reallocate not more than 
10 percent of overall storage in the joint conserva-
tion pool, as authorized by this Act and without fur-
205 
ther congressional action, if such reallocation is con-
sistent with the ongoing consultation under section 
7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 related 
to Willamette Valley System operations. 
(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the revised 
reallocation is not reallocated from a single storage 
use, does not seriously affect authorized project pur-
poses, and does not otherwise involve major oper-
ational changes to the project. 
(c) CANO
MARTIN
PENA, SAN
JUAN, PUERTO 
RICO.—Section 5127 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1242) is amended by striking 
‘‘$150,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$232,430,000’’. 
SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS BASED ON FEASI-
BILITY STUDIES PREPARED BY NON-FED-
ERAL INTERESTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to 
carry out the following projects for water resources devel-
opment and conservation and other purposes, subject to 
subsection (b): 
(1) FORT PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLOR-
IDA.—The project for hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, as 
described in the review assessment of the Secretary, 
titled ‘‘Review Assessment of St. Lucie County,
206 
Florida Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project Section 
203 Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental 
Assessment (June 2018)’’ and dated July 2018, at 
a total cost of $33,107,639, and at an estimated 
total cost of $97,958,972 for periodic nourishment 
over the 50-year life of the project. 
(2) BAPTISTE COLLETTE BAYOU, LOUISIANA.— 
The project for navigation, Baptiste Collette Bayou, 
Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of 
the 
Secretary, 
titled 
‘‘Review 
Assessment 
of 
Plaquemines Parish Government’s Section 203 
Study Baptiste Collette Bayou Navigation Channel 
Deepening Project Integrated Feasibility Study and 
Environmental Assessment (January 2017, Amend-
ed April 2018)’’ and dated June 2018, at a total 
cost of $44,920,000. 
(3) HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LOUISIANA.— 
The project for navigation, Houma Navigation 
Canal, Louisiana, as described in the review assess-
ment of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of 
Houma Navigation Canal Deepening Project Section 
203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT En-
vironmental Impact Statement (June 2018)’’ and 
dated July 2018, at a total cost of $253,458,000.
207 
(4) PORT FOURCHON BELLE PASS CHANNEL, 
LOUISIANA.—The 
project 
for 
navigation, 
Port 
Fourchon Belle Pass Channel, Louisiana, as de-
scribed in the review assessment of the Secretary, ti-
tled ‘‘Review Assessment of Port Fourchon Belle 
Pass Channel Deepening Project Section 203 Feasi-
bility Study (January 2019, revised January 2020)’’ 
and dated April 2020, at a total cost of 
$95,483,000. 
(5) WILMINGTON HARBOR, NORTH CAROLINA.— 
The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, 
North Carolina, as described in the review assess-
ment of the Secretary, titled ‘‘Review Assessment of 
Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina Navigation Im-
provement Project Integrated Section 203 Study & 
Environmental Report (February 2020)’’ and dated 
May 2020, at a total cost of $834,093,000. 
(6) CHACON CREEK, TEXAS.—The project for 
flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and 
other purposes, Chacon Creek, Texas, as described 
in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled 
‘‘Review Assessment of Chacon Creek, Texas Section 
203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT En-
vironmental Assessment (August 2018)’’ and dated 
September 2018, at a total cost of $51,973,000.
208 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may only carry 
out a project authorized under subsection (a)— 
(1) substantially in accordance with the applica-
ble review assessment for the project submitted by 
the Secretary under section 203(c) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1986, as identified in 
subsection (a) of this section, and subject to such 
modifications or conditions as the Secretary con-
siders appropriate and identifies in a final assess-
ment that addresses the concerns, recommendations, 
and conditions identified by the Secretary in the ap-
plicable review assessment; and 
(2) after the Secretary transmits to the Com-
mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on En-
vironment and Public Works of the Senate such 
final assessment. 
(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 203(c)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2231(c)(1)) is amended, in the matter preceding subpara-
graph (A), by striking ‘‘a report’’ and inserting ‘‘an as-
sessment’’.
209 
TITLE V—BUDGETARY EFFECTS 
SEC. 501. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 
shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 
titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 
Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 
by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro-
vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage. 
Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2020. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
116TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 7575 
AN ACT 
To provide for improvements to the rivers and har-
bors of the United States, to provide for the con-
servation and development of water and related 
resources, and for other purposes.