152
SEC. 3078. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Har-
bors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to di-
rect the Secretary to develop a final design and prepare 
plans and specifications to correct the harbor entrance and 
mooring conditions at the project. 
SEC. 3079. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA. 
The project for flood control, Red Lake River, 
Crookston, Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
278), is modified to include flood protection for the adjacent 
and interconnected areas generally known as the Sampson 
and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the 
Feasibility Report Supplement, Local Flood Protection, 
Crookston, Minnesota, at a total cost of $17,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $11,000,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $6,000,000. 
SEC. 3080. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, au-
thorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to include oper-
ation and maintenance of the general navigation facilities 
as a Federal responsibility.
153
SEC. 3081. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA. 
The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Min-
nesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and Har-
bor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include op-
eration and maintenance of the general navigation facilities 
as a Federal responsibility. 
SEC. 3082. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The project for navigation, Two 
Harbors, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is 
modified to include construction of a dredged material dis-
posal facility, including actions required to clear the site. 
(b) LANDS, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—Non-
Federal interests shall be responsible for providing all lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for the 
construction of the dredged material disposal facility. 
(c) MAXIMUM FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.—The max-
imum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for 
the project shall be $5,000,000. 
SEC. 3083. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. 
The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, 
Harrison County, Mississippi, being carried out under sec-
tion 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to authorize the non-Federal 
interest to provide any portion of the non-Federal share of
154
the cost of the project in the form of in-kind services and 
materials. 
SEC. 3084. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall complete a fea-
sibility study for the project for flood damage reduction, 
Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi. 
(b) COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES.—The feasibility 
study shall identify both the plan that maximizes national 
economic development benefits and the locally preferred 
plan and shall compare the level of flood damage reduction 
provided by each plan to that portion of Jackson, Mis-
sissippi, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam. 
(c) RECOMMENDED PLAN.—If the Secretary deter-
mines that the locally preferred plan provides a level of 
flood damage reduction that is equal to or greater than the 
level of flood damage reduction provided by the national 
economic development plan, and the locally preferred plan 
is technically feasible and environmentally protective, the 
Secretary shall recommend construction of the locally pre-
ferred plan. 
(d) EVALUATION OF PROJECT COST.—For the pur-
poses of determining compliance with the first section of 
the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a), 
the Secretary shall consider only the costs of the national 
economic development plan, and shall exclude incremental
155
costs associated with the locally preferred plan that are in 
excess of such costs, if the non-Federal interest agrees to pay 
100 percent of such incremental costs. 
(e) NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.—If the locally pre-
ferred plan is authorized for construction, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project shall be the same percentage 
as the non-Federal share of the cost of the national economic 
development plan plus all additional costs of construction 
associated with the locally preferred plan. 
SEC. 3085. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI. 
Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking 
‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000’’. 
SEC. 3086. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Ches-
terfield, Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), 
is modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of the plan-
ning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.
156
SEC. 3087. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI. 
The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Mis-
souri, authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Re-
sources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and sec-
tion 102(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct the Sec-
retary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
to the project. 
SEC. 3088. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA. 
The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, 
Lincoln, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), 
is modified—
(1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
design, and construction work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the work is integral to the project; and 
(2) to allow the non-Federal sponsor for the 
project to use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, 
funds provided under any other Federal program, to 
satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of
157
the project if such funds are authorized to be used to 
carry out the project. 
SEC. 3089. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA. 
The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
reduction, Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, author-
ized by section 101(b)(20) of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified—
(1) to direct the Secretary to provide credit to-
ward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
or reimbursement for the costs of any work that has 
been or will be performed by the non-Federal interest 
before, on, or after the approval of the project partner-
ship agreement, including work performed by the non-
Federal interest in connection with the design and 
construction of 7 upstream detention storage struc-
tures, if the Secretary determines that the work is in-
tegral to the project; 
(2) to require that in-kind work to be credited 
under paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and 
(3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance 
funds from the non-Federal interest as needed to 
maintain the project schedule.
158
SEC. 3090. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, 
NEW JERSEY. 
The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem res-
toration, shore protection, and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, 
New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
modified to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion con-
trol, Cape May Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 
5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal participa-
tion in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property’’, approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426h), if 
the Secretary determines that such incorporation is feasible. 
SEC. 3091. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, 
NEW JERSEY. 
The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jer-
sey and New York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) 
and modified by section 327 of the Water Resources Devel-
opment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and costs of 
preserving natural flood storage in any future economic 
analysis of the project. 
SEC. 3092. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK. 
The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of
159
1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is modified to include measures to 
enhance public access, at Federal cost of $500,000. 
SEC. 3093. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK. 
The project for shoreline protection, Orchard Beach, 
Bronx, New York, authorized by section 554 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project, 
at a total cost of $20,000,000. 
SEC. 3094. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW 
YORK AND NEW JERSEY. 
The navigation project, Port of New York and New 
Jersey, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 
101(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2576), is modified—
(1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-
Federal interest to construct a temporary dredged 
material storage facility to receive dredged material 
from the project if—
(A) the non-Federal interest submits, in 
writing, a list of potential sites for the tem-
porary storage facility to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives, the Committee on Environ-
ment and Public Works of the Senate, and the
160
Secretary at least 180 days before the selection of 
the final site; and 
(B) at least 70 percent of the dredged mate-
rial generated in connection with the project 
suitable for beneficial reuse will be used at sites 
in the State of New Jersey to the extent that 
there are sufficient sites available; and 
(2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
construction of the temporary storage facility if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project. 
SEC. 3095. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM. 
Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘New York State Canal System’ 
means the 524 miles of navigable canal that comprise the 
New York State Canal System, including the Erie, Cayuga-
Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic 
alignments of these canals, including the cities of Albany 
and Buffalo.’’.