datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 483 
To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, Texas, as the 
‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Courthouse’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY 1, 2005 
Mr. ORTIZ (for himself, Mr. REYES, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. 
DOGGETT, and Mr. PASTOR) introduced the following bill; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
A BILL 
To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, 
Texas, as the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela 
United States Courthouse’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 
The United States courthouse located at the corner 
of Seventh Street and East Jackson Street in Brownsville, 
Texas, shall be designated and known as the ‘‘Reynaldo 
G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Court-
house’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon 
B. Vela United States Courthouse’’. 
Æ
IIB 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 483 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
APRIL 14, 2005 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works 
AN ACT 
To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, 
Texas, as the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela 
United States Courthouse’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 483 RFS 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 
The United States courthouse located at the corner 
of Seventh Street and East Jackson Street in Brownsville, 
Texas, shall be designated and known as the ‘‘Reynaldo 
G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Court-
house’’. 
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon 
B. Vela United States Courthouse’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 2005. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
II 
Calendar No. 123 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 483 
To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, Texas, as the 
‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Courthouse’’. 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
APRIL 14, 2005 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works 
JUNE 9, 2005 
Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 
AN ACT 
To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, 
Texas, as the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela 
United States Courthouse’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 
The United States courthouse located at the corner 
of Seventh Street and East Jackson Street in Brownsville, 
Texas, shall be designated and known as the ‘‘Reynaldo
G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Court-
house’’. 
SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon 
B. Vela United States Courthouse’’.
Calendar No. 123 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 483 
AN ACT 
To designate a United States courthouse in 
Brownsville, Texas, as the Reynaldo G. Garza 
and Filemon B. Vela United States Courthouse. 
JUNE 9, 2005 
Reported without amendment
accrued by a dual capacity taxpayer which is a large 
integrated oil company to a foreign country or pos-
session of the United States for any period shall not 
be considered a tax— 
‘‘(A) if, for such period, the foreign coun-
try or possession does not impose a generally 
applicable income tax, or 
‘‘(B) to the extent such amount exceeds 
the amount (determined in accordance with reg-
ulations) which— 
‘‘(i) is paid by such dual capacity tax-
payer pursuant to the generally applicable 
income tax imposed by the country or pos-
session, or 
‘‘(ii) would be paid if the generally ap-
plicable income tax imposed by the country 
or possession were applicable to such dual 
capacity taxpayer. 
Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to 
imply the proper treatment of any such amount 
not in excess of the amount determined under 
subparagraph (B). 
‘‘(2) DUAL
CAPACITY
TAXPAYER.—For pur-
poses of this subsection, the term ‘dual capacity tax-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:17 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5234.IH
H5234
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4315
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 3695 Green Road in Beachwood, Ohio, as
the ‘‘Larry Small Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4841
AN ACT 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical 
correction.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 
Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 
1132 note; Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking 
‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’.
Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 
2006. 
Attest:
Clerk.
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4841
AN ACT 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a 
technical correction.
payer’ means, with respect to any foreign country or 
possession of the United States, a person who— 
‘‘(A) is subject to a levy of such country or 
possession, and 
‘‘(B) receives (or will receive) directly or 
indirectly a specific economic benefit (as deter-
mined in accordance with regulations) from 
such country or possession. 
‘‘(3) GENERALLY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX.— 
For purposes of this subsection— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The term ‘generally 
applicable income tax’ means an income tax (or 
a series of income taxes) which is generally im-
posed under the laws of a foreign country or 
possession on income derived from the conduct 
of a trade or business within such country or 
possession. 
‘‘(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Such term shall not 
include a tax unless it has substantial applica-
tion, by its terms and in practice, to— 
‘‘(i) persons who are not dual capacity 
taxpayers, and 
‘‘(ii) persons who are citizens or resi-
dents of the foreign country or possession. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:17 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5234.IH
H5234
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
‘‘(4) LARGE INTEGRATED OIL COMPANY.—For 
purposes of this subsection, the term ‘large inte-
grated oil company’ means, with respect to any tax-
able year, an integrated oil company (as defined in 
section 291(b)(4)) which— 
‘‘(A) had gross receipts in excess of 
$1,000,000,000 for such taxable year, and 
‘‘(B) has an average daily worldwide pro-
duction of crude oil of at least 500,000 barrels 
for such taxable year.’’ 
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made 
by this subsection shall apply to taxes paid or 
accrued in taxable years beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
(B) 
CONTRARY
TREATY
OBLIGATIONS 
UPHELD.—The amendments made by this sub-
section shall not apply to the extent contrary to 
any treaty obligation of the United States. 
SEC. 3. REPEAL OF TAX SUBSIDIES ENACTED BY THE EN-
ERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 FOR OIL AND GAS. 
(a) REPEAL.—The following provisions, and amend-
ments made by such provisions, of the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 are hereby repealed: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:17 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5234.IH
H5234
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
(1) Section 1323 (relating to temporary expens-
ing for equipment used in refining of liquid fuels). 
(2) Section 1328 (relating to determination of 
small refiner exception to oil depletion deduction). 
(3) Section 1329 (relating to amortization of 
geological and geophysical expenditures). 
(b) ADMINISTRATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE 
OF 1986.—The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
applied and administered as if the provisions, and amend-
ments, specified in subsection (a) had never been enacted. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:17 May 02, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5234.IH
H5234
rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
H. R. 4841
One Hundred Ninth Congress
of the
United States of America 
AT THE SECOND SESSION 
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 
the third day of January, two thousand and six 
An Act 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 
Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 
Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and 
inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4841 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MARCH 1, 2006 
Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical 
correction. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 
Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 
1132 note; Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking 
‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:17 Mar 03, 2006
Jkt 049196
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4841.IH
H4841
ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5710 
AN ACT 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial 
assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Au-
thority for the planning, design, and construction of the 
Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
IIB 
109TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4841 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
MARCH 15, 2006 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources 
AN ACT 
To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical 
correction. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:14 Mar 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4841.RFS
H4841
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
HR 4841 RFS 
SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 
Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 
1132 note; Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking 
‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 
2006. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:14 Mar 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4841.RFS
H4841
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eastern New Mexico 
Rural Water System Authorization Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) AUTHORITY.—The term ‘‘Authority’’ means 
the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority, an 
entity formed under State law for the purposes of 
planning, financing, developing, and operating the 
System. 
(2) ENGINEERING REPORT.—The term ‘‘engi-
neering report’’ means the report entitled ‘‘Eastern 
New Mexico Rural Water System Preliminary Engi-
neering Report’’ and dated October 2006. 
(3) PLAN.—The term ‘‘plan’’ means the oper-
ation, maintenance, and replacement plan required 
by section 4(b). 
(4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of the Interior. 
(5) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 
of New Mexico. 
(6) SYSTEM.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The term ‘‘System’’ 
means the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water 
System, a water delivery project designed to de-
liver approximately 16,500 acre-feet of water
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4655 
To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 13, 2007 
Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DMDPA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 
new heading: 
‘‘ 
9902.l.l 
4′-Methoxy-2,2′,4-trimethyl 
diphenylamine (CAS No. 
41374–20–3) (provided for 
in subheading 2922.29.61) ..
Free 
No change 
No change 
On or before 
12/31/2011 
’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:04 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4655.IH
H4655
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3765 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide transparency with 
respect to fees and expenses charged to participant-directed defined con-
tribution plans. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 4, 2007 
Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 
and Means 
A BILL 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 
transparency with respect to fees and expenses charged 
to participant-directed defined contribution plans. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defined Contribution 
Plan Fee Transparency Act of 2007’’. 
SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE TO PARTICIPANTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 43 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified pension, etc. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
05:04 Oct 06, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3765.IH
H3765
hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
agement plans under the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969. 
(C) On May 13, 2005, the Department of 
Agriculture published the Protection of Inven-
toried Roadless Areas rule, replacing the origi-
nal Roadless Area Conservation Rule issued in 
January 2001. The new rule gives State Gov-
ernors 18 months to petition the Federal Gov-
ernment to either restore the previous rule for 
their States, or submit a new management and 
development plan for national forest areas 
inventoried under the rule. As a result of the 
new rule, 58.5 million acres of wild national 
forests are now vulnerable to logging, road 
building, and other development that may frag-
ment natural habitats and negatively impact 
fish and wildlife. 
(3) CLEAN AIR.— 
(A) On February 14, 2002, the President 
announced the Clear Skies Initiative, a limited 
market based cap and trade system designed to 
cut down on harmful air pollutants. The legisla-
tive proposal was later submitted to the Con-
gress on July 29, 2002, and has since been in-
troduced in various forms through the last 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:06 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5235.IH
H5235
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
three Congresses. The Clear Skies Initiative 
would weaken existing emission reduction tar-
gets for sulfur dioxide, mercury, and nitrogen 
oxides under the Clean Air Act by allowing 
three times more toxic mercury emissions, 50 
percent more sulfur emissions, and hundreds of 
thousands more tons of nitrogen oxides. 
(B) On October 27, 2003, the Environ-
mental Protection Agency published the rule 
‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
and 
Non-Attainment 
New 
Source 
Review 
(NSR): Equipment Replacement Provision of 
the Routine Maintenance, Repair and Replace-
ment Exclusion’’, which was slightly clarified on 
June 6, 2005. The new rule significantly under-
mines the New Source Review Permitting Pro-
gram, a key tool of the Clean Air Act which re-
quires owners of industrial facilities to install 
modern pollution control mechanisms whenever 
existing equipment is expanded, improved, re-
placed, or significantly repaired. In clarifying 
the definition of ‘‘routine maintenance,’’ the 
new rule exempts more than 17,000 older power 
plants, oil refineries, and factories across the 
country from having to install pollution controls 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:06 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5235.IH
H5235
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
04:04 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4655.IH
H4655
ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
‘‘(D) WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAW OR 
PLAN.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘work-
ers’ compensation law or plan’ means a 
law or program administered by a State or 
the United States to provide compensation 
to workers for a work-related injury or ill-
ness (or for disability or death caused by 
such an injury or illness), including the 
Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Com-
pensation Act (33 U.S.C. 901–944, 948– 
950), chapter 81 of title 5, United States 
Code (known as the Federal Employees 
Compensation Act), the Black Lung Bene-
fits Act (30 U.S.C. 931 et seq.), and part 
C of title 4 of the Federal Coal Mine and 
Safety Act (30 U.S.C. 901 et seq.), but not 
including the Act of April 22, 1908 (45 
U.S.C. 51 et seq.) (popularly referred to as 
the Federal Employer’s Liability Act). 
‘‘(ii) INCLUSION
OF
SIMILAR
COM-
PENSATION PLAN.—Such term includes a 
similar compensation plan established by 
an employer that is funded by such em-
ployer or the insurance carrier of such em-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
when replacing equipment or carrying out up-
grades, even if such activities increase air pollu-
tion. Ultimately the new rule undermines the 
effectiveness of the Clean Air Act and fails to 
hold the oldest and dirtiest industrial facilities 
accountable for reducing the amount of pollu-
tion they produce, allowing them to continue to 
emit harmful toxic pollutants that will have a 
detrimental impact on public health and the en-
vironment. 
(C) On March 29, 2005, the Environ-
mental Protection Agency formally revised and 
reversed the regulatory finding that it issued in 
December 
2000 
pursuant 
to 
section 
112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act, removing 
coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam gener-
ating units from the Clean Air Act section 
112(c) source category list. The new rule re-
vokes a decision in 2000 which determined that 
as the largest domestic source of mercury emis-
sions it is ‘‘necessary and appropriate’’ to re-
quire power plants which use coal- and oil-fired 
utility units to apply technology that would re-
duce their mercury emissions as those emissions 
pose a significant public health and environ-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:06 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5235.IH
H5235
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
mental hazard. By reversing its previous intent 
to regulate these power plants and reduce the 
emissions of a serious hazardous air pollutant, 
the Environmental Protection Agency is poten-
tially exposing millions of people to continued 
mercury pollution. 
(D) On May 18, 2005, the Environmental 
Protection Agency issued a new rule entitled 
‘‘Standards of Performance for New and Exist-
ing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam 
Generating Units’’, also known as the Clean Air 
Mercury Rule, which implements a cap-and- 
trade approach that is intended to reduce mer-
cury emissions from coal-fired power plants. 
The new rule subverts a previous Environ-
mental Protection Agency finding that required 
power plants to implement maximum achievable 
controls on mercury emissions by 2008, a deci-
sion that would have resulted in a 90 percent 
cut within 3 years, and further replaces an ex-
isting target of achieving an overall 70 percent 
reduction in emissions by 2018 in favor of a 50 
percent reduction by 2020. By delaying the reg-
ulation of mercury emissions and reducing the 
overall targets for reduction the Environmental 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:06 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5235.IH
H5235
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
ployer to provide compensation to a worker 
of such employer for a work-related injury 
or illness. 
‘‘(E) 
COMPROMISE
AGREEMENT.—The 
term ‘compromise agreement’ means a workers’ 
compensation settlement agreement that— 
‘‘(i) applies to a workers’ compensa-
tion claim that is denied or contested, in 
whole or in part, by a workers’ compensa-
tion payer involved under the workers’ 
compensation law or plan (or similar com-
pensation plan) applicable to the jurisdic-
tion in which the agreement has been set-
tled; and 
‘‘(ii) does not provide for a payment 
of the full amount of benefits sought or 
payable under the workers’ compensation 
claim. 
‘‘(F) COMMUTATION
AGREEMENT.—The 
term ‘commutation agreement’ means a work-
ers’ compensation settlement agreement to set-
tle all or a portion of a workers’ compensation 
claim, in which— 
‘‘(i) liability for past and future bene-
fits is not disputed; and 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
18:21 May 07, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5309.IH
H5309
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5710 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance 
to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority for the planning, 
design, and construction of the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Sys-
tem, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 3, 2008 
Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial 
assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Au-
thority for the planning, design, and construction of the 
Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other 
purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eastern New Mexico 
Rural Water System Authorization Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
21:17 Apr 04, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5710.IH
H5710
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
mented a regulation or law listed in section 4(a) shall sub-
mit to the Congress a plan describing the steps such de-
partment or such agency will take, or has taken, to restore 
or improve protections for public health and the environ-
ment in whole or in part that were in existence prior to 
the issuance of such regulation or law. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:06 Apr 30, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5235.IH
H5235
cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4320
AN ACT
To assist in the conservation of great apes by sup-
porting and providing financial resources for the
conservation programs of countries within the
range of great apes and projects of persons with
demonstrated expertise in the conservation of
great apes.