1279 
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $2,000,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), 
the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military 
family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
$365,400,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2007, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total 
amount of $5,106,703,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United States authorized by section 2101(a), 
$3,198,150,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by section 2101(b), 
$254,950,000.
1280 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, 
United States Code, $25,900,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $321,983,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $424,400,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including the functions described in section 
2833 of title 10, United States Code), 
$731,920,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 2 of a 
barracks complex at Fort Lewis, Washington, au-
thorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2445), as 
amended by section 20814 of the Continuing Appro-
priations Resolution, 2007 (division B of Public Law 
109–289), as added by section 2 of the Revised Con-
tinuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public 
Law 110–5; 121 Stat. 41), $102,000,000.
1281 
(7) For the construction of increment 3 of a 
barracks complex at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, 
authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 
(division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3485), $47,400,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
(a). 
(2) $137,000,000 (the balance of the amount 
authorized under section 2101(a) for construction of 
the United States Southern Command Head-
quarters, Miami, Florida). 
(3) $63,500,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(b) for construction of a 
brigade complex operations support facility at 
Vicenza, Italy). 
(4) $63,500,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2101(b) for construction of a
1282 
brigade complex barracks and community support 
facility at Vicenza, Italy). 
SEC. 2105. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
FISCAL YEAR 2007 ARMY PROJECTS FOR 
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED. 
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (di-
vision B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2445), as 
amended by section 20814 of the Continuing Appropria-
tions Resolution, 2007 (division B of Public Law 109– 
289), as added by section 2 of the Revised Continuing Ap-
propriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110–5), is fur-
ther amended— 
(1) by striking the item relating to Redstone 
Arsenal, Alabama; 
(2) by striking the item relating to Fort Wain-
wright, Alaska; 
(3) in the item relating to Fort Irwin, Cali-
fornia, by striking ‘‘$18,200,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’; 
(4) in the item relating to Fort Carson, Colo-
rado, by striking ‘‘$30,800,000’’ in the amount col-
umn and inserting ‘‘$24,000,000’’;
1283 
(5) in the item relating to Fort Leavenworth, 
Kansas, by striking ‘‘$23,200,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000’’; 
(6) in the item relating to Fort Riley, Kansas, 
by striking ‘‘$47,400,000’’ in the amount column 
and inserting ‘‘$37,200,000’’; 
(7) in the item relating to Fort Campbell, Ken-
tucky, by striking ‘‘$135,300,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$115,400,000’’; 
(8) by striking the item relating to Fort Polk, 
Louisiana; 
(9) by striking the item relating to Aberdeen 
Proving Ground, Maryland; 
(10) by striking the item relating to Fort 
Detrick, Maryland; 
(11) by striking the item relating to Detroit Ar-
senal, Michigan; 
(12) in the item relating to Fort Leonard 
Wood, Missouri, by striking ‘‘$34,500,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$17,000,000’’; 
(13) by striking the item relating to Picatinny 
Arsenal, New Jersey; 
(14) in the item relating to Fort Drum, New 
York, by striking ‘‘$218,600,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$209,200,000’’;
1284 
(15) in the item relating to Fort Bragg, North 
Carolina, by striking ‘‘$96,900,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$89,000,000’’; 
(16) 
by 
striking 
the 
item 
relating 
to 
Letterkenny Depot, Pennsylvania; 
(17) by striking the item relating to Corpus 
Christi Army Depot, Texas; 
(18) by striking the item relating to Fort Bliss, 
Texas; 
(19) in the item relating to Fort Hood, Texas, 
by striking ‘‘$93,000,000’’ in the amount column 
and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000’’; 
(20) by striking the item relating to Red River 
Depot, Texas; and 
(21) by striking the item relating to Fort Lee, 
Virginia. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2104(a) 
of such Act (120 Stat. 2447) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking 
‘‘$3,518,450,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$3,275,700,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$1,362,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,119,450,000’’.
1285 
SEC. 2106. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FIS-
CAL YEAR 2007. 
(a) LOCATION OF PROJECT IN ROMANIA.—The table 
in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 
Stat. 2446) is amended by striking ‘‘Babadag Range’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base’’. 
(b) SPELLING ERROR RELATING TO ARMY FAMILY 
HOUSING.—The table in section 2102(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for 2007 (division B of 
Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2446) is amended by 
striking ‘‘Fort McCoyine’’ and inserting ‘‘Fort McCoy’’. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2006 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2101(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3485) is amended in the item relating to Fort Bragg, 
North Carolina, by striking ‘‘$301,250,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$308,250,000’’. 
(b) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Section 
2104(b)(5) of that Act (119 Stat. 3488) is amended by 
striking ‘‘$77,400,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$84,400,000’’.
1286 
SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION
AND RENEWAL.—Notwithstanding 
section 2701 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108– 
375; 118 Stat. 2116), the authorization set forth in the 
table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 
Act (118 Stat. 2101), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2008, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2009, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2005 Project Authorization 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Schofield Barracks, Hawaii ..............
Training facility .....................
$35,542,000 
SEC. 2109. GROUND LEASE, SOUTHCOM HEADQUARTERS 
FACILITY, MIAMI-DORAL, FLORIDA. 
(a) GROUND LEASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 
the Army may utilize the State of Florida property as de-
scribed in sublease number 4489–01, entered into between 
the State of Florida and the United States (in this section 
referred to as the ‘‘ground lease’’), for the purpose of con-
structing a consolidated headquarters facility for the 
United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
1287 
(b) ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.—The 
Secretary of the Army may carry out the project to con-
struct a new headquarters on property leased from the 
State of Florida when the following conditions have been 
met regarding the lease for the property: 
(1) The United States Government shall have 
the right to use the property without interruption 
until at least December 31, 2055. 
(2) The United States Government shall have 
the right to use the property for general administra-
tive purposes in the event the United States South-
ern Command relocates or vacates the property. 
(c) AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN GROUND LEASE OF AD-
JACENT
PROPERTY.—The Secretary may obtain the 
ground lease of additional real property owned by the 
State of Florida that is adjacent to the real property 
leased under the ground lease for purposes of completing 
the construction of the SOUTHCOM headquarters facil-
ity, as long as the additional terms of the ground lease 
required by subsection (b) apply to such adjacent prop-
erty. 
(d) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not obligate or 
expend funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
of appropriations in section 2104(a)(1) for the construc-
tion of the SOUTHCOM headquarters facility authorized
1288 
under section 2101(a) until the Secretary transmits to the 
congressional defense committees a modification to the 
ground lease signed by the United States Government and 
the State of Florida in accordance with subsection (b). 
TITLE XXII—NAVY 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Termination of authority to carry out fiscal year 2007 Navy projects 
for which funds were not appropriated. 
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2005 
project. 
Sec. 2207. Repeal of authorization for construction of Navy Outlying Landing 
Field, Washington County, North Carolina. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ..............
Outlying Field Evergreen ...............................
$9,560,000 
Arizona ................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma ...................
$33,720,000 
California ............
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar ...............
$26,760,000 
.............................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton .............
$264,360,000 
.............................
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms .........
$142,619,000 
........................
Naval Station, San Diego ...............................
$3,000,000 
.............................
Naval Support Activity, Monterey ..................
$9,780,000 
.............................
Submarine Base, San Diego ...........................
$23,630,000 
Connecticut .........
Submarine Base, New London .......................
$21,160,000 
Florida ................
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Blount Island ..
$10,240,000 
.............................
Naval Support Activity, Cape Canaveral ........
$9,900,000 
.............................
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Panama City 
$13,870,000
1289 
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
.............................
Naval Training Center, Corry Field ...............
$3,140,000 
Georgia ...............
Marine Corps Logistics Base ..........................
$9,980,000 
Hawaii .................
Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe ...............
$37,961,000 
........................
Naval Base, Pearl Harbor ..............................
$99,860,000 
.............................
Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Wahiawa ...........
$65,410,000 
.............................
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard .........................
$30,200,000 
Illinois .................
Naval Training Center, Great Lakes ..............
$10,221,000 
Indiana ................
Naval Support Activity, Crane .......................
$23,800,000 
Maine ..................
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard ...........................
$9,700,000 
Maryland .............
Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River ....
$38,360,000 
........................
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head
$9,450,000 
Mississippi ...........
Naval Air Station, Meridian ...........................
$6,770,000 
Nevada ................
Naval Air Station, Fallon ...............................
$11,460,000 
New Jersey .........
Naval Air Warfare Center, Lakehurst ............
$4,100,000 
North Carolina ....
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point ........
$28,610,000 
........................
Marine Corps Air Station, New River ............
$58,700,000 
.............................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ................
$248,930,000 
Rhode Island .......
Naval Station, Newport ..................................
$13,760,000 
South Carolina ....
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ...............
$10,300,000 
........................
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island ...
$55,282,000 
Texas ..................
Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi ..................
$14,290,000 
Virginia ...............
Marine Corps Base, Quantico .........................
$50,519,000 
.............................
Naval Station, Norfolk ....................................
$79,560,000 
........................
Naval Support Activity, Chesapeake ..............
$8,450,000 
........................
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren ......
$10,000,000 
Washington .........
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island .................
$34,520,000 
.............................
Naval Station, Bremerton ...............................
$190,960,000 
........................
Naval Station, Everett ....................................
$10,940,000 
.............................
Naval Station, Kitsap .....................................
$6,130,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain .............................
Southwest Asia ......................................
$35,500,000 
Diego Garcia .....................
Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia ..
$7,150,000 
Djibouti .............................
Camp Lemonier .....................................
$22,390,000 
Guam ................................
Naval Activities, Guam .........................
$278,818,000
1290 
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a)(3), the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for unspecified installations or locations in the 
amount set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Unspecified Worldwide 
Location 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified .....
Wharf Utilities Upgrade .......................
$8,900,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the 
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the 
installations, in the number of units, and in the amounts 
set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Location 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
California .................
Twentynine Palms .........................
N/A .....
$4,800,000 
Mariana Islands .......
Naval Activities, Guam .................
73 .......
$57,167,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a)(6)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may 
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
1294 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of sub-
section (a). 
(2) $50,000,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a submarine 
drive-in magnetic silencing facility in Pearl Harbor, 
Hawaii). 
(3) $50,912,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(b) for construction of a 
wharf extension in Apra Harbor, Guam). 
(4) $71,200,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized under section 2201(a) for a nuclear aircraft 
carrier maintenance pier at Naval Station Brem-
erton, Washington). 
SEC. 2205. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
FISCAL YEAR 2007 NAVY PROJECTS FOR 
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED. 
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2201(a) of the Military
1295 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (di-
vision B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2449) is 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Marine Corps Base, 
Twentynine 
Palms, 
California, 
by 
striking 
‘‘$27,217,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$8,217,000’’; 
(2) by striking the item relating to Naval Sup-
port Activity, Monterey, California; 
(3) by striking the item relating to Naval Sub-
marine Base, New London, Connecticut; 
(4) by striking the item relating to Cape Canav-
eral, Florida; 
(5) in the item relating to Marine Corps Logis-
tics 
Base, 
Albany, 
Georgia, 
by 
striking 
‘‘$70,540,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$62,000,000’’; 
(6) by striking the item relating to Naval Mag-
azine, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; 
(7) by striking the item relating to Naval Ship-
yard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; 
(8) by striking the item relating to Naval Sup-
port Activity, Crane, Indiana; 
(9) by striking the item relating to Portsmouth 
Naval Shipyard, Maine;
1296 
(10) by striking the item relating to Naval Air 
Station, Meridian, Mississippi; 
(11) by striking the item relating to Naval Air 
Station, Fallon, Nevada; 
(12) by striking the item relating to Marine 
Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina; 
(13) by striking the item relating to Naval Sta-
tion, Newport, Rhode Island; 
(14) in the item relating to Marine Corps Air 
Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, by striking 
‘‘$25,575,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$22,225,000’’; 
(15) by striking the item relating to Naval Spe-
cial Weapons Center, Dahlgren, Virginia; 
(16) in the item relating to Naval Support Ac-
tivity, Norfolk, Virginia, by striking ‘‘$41,712,000’’ 
in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$28,462,000’’; 
(17) in the item relating to Naval Air Station, 
Whidbey 
Island, 
Washington, 
by 
striking 
‘‘$67,303,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$57,653,000’’; and 
(18) in the item relating to Naval Base, Kitsap, 
Washington, by striking ‘‘$17,617,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$13,507,000’’.
1297 
(b) TERMINATION OF MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
PROJECTS.—Section 2204(a)(6)(A) of such Act (120 
Stat. 2450) is amended by striking ‘‘$308,956,000’’ and 
inserting ‘‘$305,256,000’’. 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2204(a) of 
such Act (120 Stat. 2450) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking 
‘‘$2,109,367,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$1,946,867,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$832,982,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$674,182,000’’. 
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2201(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 
2105), as amended by section 2206 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division 
B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3493) and section 
2205 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 
Stat. 2452), is amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Strategic Weapons 
Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington, by striking
1298 
‘‘$147,760,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 
‘‘$295,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the 
total 
in 
the 
amount 
column 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$972,719,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2204 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2107), 
as amended by section 2206 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of 
Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3493) and section 2205 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 
2453), is amended in subsection (b)(6), by striking 
‘‘$95,320,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$259,320,000’’. 
SEC. 2207. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUC-
TION OF NAVY OUTLYING LANDING FIELD, 
WASHINGTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. 
(a) REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION.—The table in sec-
tion 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108– 
136; 117 Stat. 1704) is amended by striking the item re-
lating to Navy Outlying Landing Field, Washington Coun-
ty, North Carolina, as added by section 2205(a) of the
1299 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2452). 
(b) REPEAL OF INCREMENTAL FUNDING AUTHOR-
ITY.—Section 2204(b) of that Act (117 Stat. 1706) is 
amended by striking paragraph (6). 
(c) EFFECT OF REPEAL.—The amendments made by 
this section do not affect the expenditure of funds obli-
gated, before the effective date of this title, for the con-
struction of the Navy Outlying Landing Field, Wash-
ington County, North Carolina, or the acquisition of real 
property to facilitate such construction. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
Sec. 2305. Termination of authority to carry out fiscal year 2007 Air Force 
projects for which funds were not appropriated. 
Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2006 
projects. 
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2005 projects. 
Sec. 2308. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2004 projects. 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(1), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations inside the
1300 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .................
Elmendorf Air Force Base ..............................
$83,180,000 
Arizona ................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ......................
$11,200,000 
........................
Luke Air Force Base ......................................
$5,500,000 
Arkansas .............
Little Rock Air Force Base ............................
$19,600,000 
California ............
Travis Air Force Base ....................................
$37,400,000 
Colorado ..............
Fort Carson ....................................................
$13,500,000 
........................
Schriever Air Force Base ................................
$24,500,000 
.............................
United States Air Force Academy ..................
$15,000,000 
District of Colum-
bia.
Bolling Air Force Base ...................................
$2,500,000 
Florida ................
Eglin Air Force Base ......................................
$158,300,000 
........................
MacDill Air Force Base ..................................
$60,500,000 
.............................
Patrick Air Force Base ...................................
$11,854,000 
........................
Tyndall Air Force Base ..................................
$52,514,000 
Georgia ...............
Moody Air Force Base ....................................
$7,500,000 
........................
Robins Air Force Base ...................................
$19,700,000 
Hawaii .................
Hickam Air Force Base ..................................
$31,971,000 
Illinois .................
Scott Air Force Base ......................................
$24,900,000 
Kansas ................
Fort Riley .......................................................
$12,515,000 
........................
McConnell Air Force Base ..............................
$6,300,000 
Massachusetts .....
Hanscom Air Force Base ...............................
$12,800,000 
Mississippi ...........
Columbus Air Force Base ...............................
$9,800,000 
Missouri ..............
Whiteman Air Force Base ..............................
$11,400,000 
Montana ..............
Malmstrom Air Force Base ............................
$7,000,000 
Nebraska .............
Offutt Air Force Base ....................................
$16,952,000 
Nevada ................
Nellis Air Force Base .....................................
$4,950,000 
New Mexico .........
Cannon Air Force Base ..................................
$1,688,000 
........................
Kirtland Air Force Base .................................
$15,100,000 
North Dakota .....
Grand Forks Air Force Base ..........................
$13,000,000 
........................
Minot Air Force Base .....................................
$18,200,000 
Oklahoma ............
Altus Air Force Base ......................................
$2,000,000 
........................
Tinker Air Force Base ....................................
$34,600,000 
.............................
Vance Air Force Base .....................................
$7,700,000 
South Carolina ....
Charleston Air Force Base .............................
$11,000,000 
........................
Shaw Air Force Base ......................................
$9,300,000 
South Dakota ......
Ellsworth Air Force Base ...............................
$16,600,000 
Texas ..................
Goodfellow Air Force Base .............................
$5,800,000 
........................
Lackland Air Force Base ................................
$14,000,000 
.............................
Laughlin Air Force Base ................................
$5,200,000 
.............................
Randolph Air Force Base ...............................
$2,950,000 
.............................
Shepard Air Force Base .................................
$7,000,000 
Utah ....................
Hill Air Force Base ........................................
$25,999,000 
Washington .........
Fairchild Air Force Base ................................
$6,200,000 
Wyoming .............
Francis E. Warren Air Force Base ................
$14,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(2), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
1301 
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ...........................
Ramstein Air Base ................................
$48,209,000 
Guam ................................
Andersen Air Force Base ......................
$15,816,000 
Qatar ................................
Al Udeid Air Base .................................
$22,300,000 
Spain .................................
Moron Air Base .....................................
$1,800,000 
United Kingdom ...............
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ................
$17,300,000 
......................................
Royal Air Force Menwith Hill Station
$41,000,000 
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(3), the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for unspecified installations or locations in the 
amount set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Unspecified Worldwide 
Location 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Worldwide Classified ........
Classified Project ..................................
$1,500,000 
......................................
Classified-Special Evaluation Program
$12,328,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2304(6)(A), the Secretary of the 
Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units 
(including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the 
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in 
the amounts set forth in the following table:
1302 
Air Force: Family Housing 
State or Country 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Germany ....................
Ramstein Air Base ........................
117 ...
$56,275,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2304(6)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may 
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction 
or improvement of military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $12,210,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States 
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the 
authorization of appropriations in section 2304(6)(A), the 
Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military 
family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
$259,262,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2007, for mili-
tary construction, land acquisition, and military family 
housing functions of the Department of the Air Force in 
the total amount of $2,175,829,000, as follows:
1303 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United States authorized by section 2301(a), 
$872,273,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by section 2301(b), 
$146,425,000. 
(3) For the military construction projects at 
unspecified worldwide locations authorized by section 
2301(c), $13,828,000. 
(4) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, 
United States Code, $15,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $43,721,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $327,747,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 
of title 10, United States Code), $688,335,000. 
(7) For the construction of increments 3 and 4 
of the main base runway at Edwards Air Force 
Base, California, authorized by section 2301(a) of
1304 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 
119 Stat. 3494), $43,500,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
CENTCOM Joint Intelligence Center at MacDill Air 
Force Base, Florida, authorized by section 2301(a) 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109– 
163; 119 Stat. 3494), as amended by section 2305 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109– 
364; 120 Stat. 2456), $25,000,000. 
SEC. 2305. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
FISCAL YEAR 2007 AIR FORCE PROJECTS FOR 
WHICH FUNDS WERE NOT APPROPRIATED. 
(a) TERMINATION OF INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 
PROJECTS.—The table in section 2301(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (di-
vision B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2453) is 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Elmendorf, Alaska, 
by striking ‘‘$68,100,000’’ in the amount column 
and inserting ‘‘$56,100,000’’;
1305 
(2) in the item relating to Davis-Monthan Air 
Force Base, Arizona, by striking ‘‘$11,800,000’’ in 
the amount column and inserting ‘‘$4,600,000’’; 
(3) by striking the item relating to Little Rock 
Air Force Base, Arkansas; 
(4) in the item relating to Travis Air Force 
Base, California, by striking ‘‘$85,800,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$73,900,000’’; 
(5) by striking the item relating to Peterson Air 
Force Base, Colorado; 
(6) in the item relating to Dover Air Force, 
Delaware, by striking ‘‘$30,400,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$26,400,000’’; 
(7) in the item relating to Eglin Air Force 
Base, Florida, by striking ‘‘$30,350,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$19,350,000’’; 
(8) in the item relating to Tyndall Air Force 
Base, Florida, by striking ‘‘$8,200,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,800,000’’; 
(9) in the item relating to Robins Air Force 
Base, Georgia, by striking ‘‘$59,600,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$38,600,000’’; 
(10) in the item relating to Scott Air Force 
Base, Illinois, by striking ‘‘$28,200,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’;
1306 
(11) by striking the item relating to McConnell 
Air Force Base, Kansas; 
(12) by striking the item relating to Hanscom 
Air Force Base, Massachusetts; 
(13) by striking the item relating to Whiteman 
Air Force Base, Missouri; 
(14) by striking the item relating to Malmstrom 
Air Force Base, Montana; 
(15) in the item relating to McGuire Air Force 
Base, New Jersey, by striking ‘‘$28,500,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$15,500,000’’; 
(16) by striking the item relating to Kirtland 
Air Force Base, New Mexico; 
(17) by striking the item relating to Minot Air 
Force Base, North Dakota; 
(18) in the item relating to Altus Air Force 
Base, Oklahoma, by striking ‘‘$9,500,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,500,000’’; 
(19) by striking the item relating to Tinker Air 
Force Base, Oklahoma; 
(20) by striking the item relating to Charleston 
Air Force Base, South Carolina; 
(21) in the item relating to Shaw Air Force 
Base, South Carolina, by striking ‘‘$31,500,000’’ in 
the amount column and inserting ‘‘$22,200,000’’;
1307 
(22) by striking the item relating to Ellsworth 
Air Force Base, South Dakota; 
(23) by striking the item relating to Laughlin 
Air Force Base, Texas; 
(24) by striking the item relating to Sheppard 
Air Force Base, Texas; 
(25) in the item relating to Hill Air Force 
Base, Utah, by striking ‘‘$63,400,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$53,400,000’’; and 
(26) by striking the item relating to Fairchild 
Air Force Base, Washington. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2304(a) 
of such Act (120 Stat. 2455) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking 
‘‘$3,231,442,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$3,005,817,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$962,286,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$736,661,000’’. 
(c) EXCEPTION.—The termination of the authoriza-
tion of a military construction project or land acquisition 
as a result of the amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
not apply with respect to a military construction project 
or land acquisition— 
(1) that was authorized by section 2301(a) of 
such Act; and
1308 
(2) for which a contract for the construction or 
acquisition was entered into before October 1, 2007. 
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2006 PROJECTS. 
(a) FURTHER
MODIFICATION
OF
INSIDE
THE 
UNITED STATES PROJECT.—The table in section 2301(a) 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3494), as amended by section 2305(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division 
B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2456), is further 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Edwards Air Force 
Base, California, by striking ‘‘$103,000,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$111,500,000’’; and 
(2) in the item relating to MacDill Air Force 
Base, Florida, by striking ‘‘$101,500,000’’ in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$126,500,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2304(b) 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3496), as amended by section 2305(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division 
B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2456), is further 
amended—
1309 
(1) 
in 
paragraph 
(3), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$66,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$74,500,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(4), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$23,300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$48,300,000’’. 
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2005 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION
AND RENEWAL.—Notwithstanding 
section 2701 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108– 
375; 118 Stat. 2116), the authorizations set forth in the 
table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2302 of that 
Act (118 Stat. 2110), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2008, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2009, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2005 Project Authorizations 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ari-
zona.
Family housing (250 units) ..
$48,500,000 
Vandenberg Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia.
Family housing (120 units) ..
$30,906,000 
MacDill Air Force Base, Florida .....
Family housing (61 units) ....
$21,723,000 
......................................................
Housing maintenance facility 
$1,250,000 
Columbus Air Force Base, Mis-
sissippi.
Housing management facility 
$711,000 
Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri 
Family housing (160 units) ..
$37,087,000 
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, 
North Carolina.
Family housing (167 units) ..
$32,693,000 
Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas ...
Family housing (127 units) ..
$20,604,000 
Ramstein Air Base, Germany ..........
USAFE Theater Aerospace 
Operations Support Center.
$24,024,000
1310 
SEC. 2308. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2701 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 
1716), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection 
(b), as provided in section 2302 of that Act (117 Stat. 
1710) and extended by section 2702 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division 
B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2464), shall remain 
in effect until October 1, 2008, or the date of the enact-
ment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction 
for fiscal year 2009, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2004 Project Authorizations 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Travis Air Force Base, California ....
Family housing (56 units) ....
$12,723,000 
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida .........
Family housing (279 units) ..
$32,166,000 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGENCIES 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Sec. 2404. Termination or modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 
year 2007 Defense Agencies projects. 
Sec. 2405. Munitions demilitarization facilities, Blue Grass Army Depot, Ken-
tucky, and Pueblo Chemical Activity, Colorado. 
Sec. 2406. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2005 projects.
1311 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a)(1), the Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following ta-
bles: 
Defense Education Activity 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
North Carolina 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune .......................
$2,014,000 
Defense Intelligence Agency 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
District of Columbia ..
Bolling Air Force Base ................................
$1,012,000 
Defense Logistics Agency 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California .........
Port Loma Annex ...................................................
$140,000,000 
Florida .............
Naval Air Station, Key West .................................
$1,874,000 
Hawaii .............
Hickam Air Force Base .........................................
$11,900,000 
New Mexico .....
Kirtland Air Force Base ........................................
$1,800,000 
Ohio .................
Defense Supply Center, Columbus .........................
$4,000,000 
Pennsylvania ....
Defense Distribution Depot, New Cumberland .....
$21,000,000 
Virginia ............
Fort Belvoir ............................................................
$5,000,000 
National Security Agency 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Maryland .........
Fort Meade .............................................................
$11,901,000 
Special Operations Command 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California .........
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ....................
$20,030,000 
.....................
Naval Amphibious Base, Coronodo ........................
$12,000,000 
Florida .............
Hurlburt Field ........................................................
$29,111,000 
.....................
MacDill Air Force Base .........................................
$47,700,000
1312 
Special Operations Command—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Georgia ............
Fort Benning ..........................................................
$35,000,000 
.....................
Hunter Army Air Field ..........................................
$13,800,000 
Kentucky .........
Fort Campbell ........................................................
$53,500,000 
Mississippi .......
Stennis Space Center .............................................
$10,200,000 
New Mexico .....
Cannon Air Force Base ..........................................
$7,500,000 
North Carolina 
Fort Bragg .............................................................
$47,250,000 
.....................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune .......................
$28,210,000 
Virginia ............
Dam Neck ..............................................................
$113,800,000 
.....................
Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek ....................
$48,000,000 
Washington ......
Fort Lewis ..............................................................
$77,000,000 
TRICARE Management Activity 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Florida .............
MacDill Air Force Base .........................................
$5,000,000 
Illinois ..............
Naval Hospital, Great Lakes .................................
$99,000,000 
New York ........
Fort Drum ..............................................................
$41,000,000 
Texas ...............
Camp Bullis ............................................................
$7,400,000 
Virginia ............
Naval Station, Norfolk ...........................................
$6,450,000 
Washington ......
Fort Lewis ..............................................................
$21,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a)(2), the Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing tables: 
Defense Education Activity 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium ................
Sterrebeek .........................................................
$5,992,000 
Germany ...............
Ramstein Air Base ............................................
$5,393,000 
..........................
Wiesbaden Air Base ..........................................
$20,472,000 
Special Operations Command 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain .................
Southwest Asia ..................................................
$19,000,000 
Qatar ....................
Al Udeid AB ......................................................
$52,852,000
1313 
TRICARE Management Activity 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ...............
Spangdahlem Air Base ......................................
$30,100,000 
(c) UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE.—Using the amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a)(3), the Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for unspecified installations or locations in the 
amount set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Unspecified Worldwide 
Location 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Worldwide Classi-
fied.
Classified Project ..............................................
$1,887,000 
SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(a)(7), the Sec-
retary of Defense may carry out energy conservation 
projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States 
Code, in the amount of $70,000,000. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DE-
FENSE AGENCIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to 
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 
30, 2007, for military construction, land acquisition, and 
military family housing functions of the Department of
1314 
Defense (other than the military departments) in the total 
amount of $1,763,120,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United States authorized by section 2401(a), 
$791,902,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by section 2401(b), 
$133,809,000. 
(3) For the military construction projects at 
unspecified worldwide locations authorized by section 
2301(c), $1,887,000. 
(4) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects under section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $23,711,000. 
(5) For contingency construction projects of the 
Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, 
United States Code, $5,000,000. 
(6) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $155,569,000. 
(7) For energy conservation projects authorized 
by section 2402 of this Act, $70,000,000. 
(8) For military family housing functions:
1315 
(A) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 
of title 10, United States Code), $48,848,000. 
(B) For credit to the Department of De-
fense Family Housing Improvement Fund es-
tablished by section 2883(a)(1) of title 10, 
United States Code, $500,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
regional security operations center at Kunia, Hawaii, 
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2006 (di-
vision B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3497), 
as amended by section 7017 of the Emergency Sup-
plemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Glob-
al War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 
(Public 
Law 
109–234; 
120 
Stat. 
485), 
$136,318,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
regional security operations center at Augusta, Geor-
gia, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2006 
(division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3497), as amended by section 7016 of the Emer-
gency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, 
the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery,
1316 
2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 485), 
$100,000,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
health clinic replacement at MacDill Air Force Base, 
Florida, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 
2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 
2457), $41,400,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 2 of the 
replacement of the Army Medical Research Institute 
of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland, 
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2007 (di-
vision B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), 
$150,000,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 9 of a 
munitions demilitarization facility at Pueblo Chem-
ical Activity, Colorado, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 
104–201; 110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 
2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 
65; 113 Stat. 839) and section 2407 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003
1317 
(division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 
2698), $35,159,000. 
(14) For the construction of increment 8 of a 
munitions demilitarization facility at Blue Grass 
Army Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 
106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 
2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107– 
107; 115 Stat. 1298) and section 2405 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 
2698), $69,017,000. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the sum of the following: 
(1) The total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of sub-
section (a). 
(2) $84,300,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized for the Defense Logistics Agency under sec-
1318 
tion 2401(a) for the replacement of fuel storage fa-
cilities, Point Loma Annex, California). 
(3) $47,250,000 (the balance of the amount au-
thorized for the Special Operations Command under 
section 2401(a) for a special operations forces oper-
ations facility at Dam Neck, Virginia). 
SEC. 2404. TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION OF AUTHOR-
ITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2007 DEFENSE AGENCIES PROJECTS. 
(a) TERMINATION OF PROJECTS FOR WHICH FUNDS 
WERE NOT APPROPRIATED.—The table relating to Spe-
cial Operations Command in section 2401(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
(division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457) is 
amended— 
(1) by striking the item relating to Stennis 
Space Center, Mississippi; and 
(2) in the item relating to Fort Bragg, North 
Carolina, by striking ‘‘$51,768,000’’ in the amount 
column and inserting ‘‘$44,868,000’’. 
(b) MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN BASE CLOSURE
AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVI-
TIES.—Section 2405(a)(7) of that Act (120 Stat. 2460) 
is amended by striking ‘‘$191,220,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$252,279,000’’.
1319 
(c) MODIFICATION OF MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZA-
TION FACILITY PROJECT.—Section 2405(a)(15) of that 
Act 
(120 
Stat. 
2461) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘$99,157,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$89,157,000’’. 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2405(a) 
of that Act (120 Stat. 2460) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking 
‘‘$7,163,431,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$7,197,390,000’’; and 
(2) 
in 
paragraph 
(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$533,099,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$515,999,000’’. 
SEC. 2405. MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION FACILITIES, 
BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT, KENTUCKY, AND 
PUEBLO CHEMICAL ACTIVITY, COLORADO. 
(a) MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, BLUE 
GRASS ARMY DEPOT.— 
(1) AUTHORITY
TO
INCREASE
AMOUNT
FOR 
CONSTRUCTION.—Consistent with the total project 
amount authorized for the construction a munitions 
demilitarization facility at Blue Grass Army Depot, 
Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 
(division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 836), 
as amended by section 2405 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002
1322 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108– 
375; 118 Stat. 2116), the authorizations set forth in the 
table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that 
Act (118 Stat. 2112), shall remain in effect until October 
1, 2008, or the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2009, 
whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2005 Project Authorizations 
Installation or Location 
Agency and 
Project 
Amount 
Naval Air Station, Oceana, Virginia .....
DLA bulk fuel storage 
tank.
$3,589,000 
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida 
TMA hospital project .......
$28,438,000 
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC 
TREATY ORGANIZATION SE-
CURITY 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
1323 
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of con-
struction previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2007, for con-
tributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 
of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United 
States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization Security Investment Program authorized by 
section 2501, in the amount of $201,400,000. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction 
and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Sec. 2607. Termination of authority to carry out fiscal year 2007 Guard and 
Reserve projects for which funds were not appropriated. 
Sec. 2608. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2006 Air Force 
Reserve construction and acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2609. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2005 projects. 
Sec. 2610. Extension of authorizations of certain Fiscal Year 2004 projects. 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(1)(A), the Sec-
1324 
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army National 
Guard locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama ...........................
Springville ..................................................
$3,300,000 
Arizona .............................
Florence .....................................................
$10,870,000 
Arkansas ...........................
Camp Robinson .........................................
$25,823,000 
California ..........................
Camp Roberts ............................................
$2,850,000 
......................................
Sacramento Army Depot ...........................
$21,000,000 
Connecticut .......................
Niantic .......................................................
$13,600,000 
Florida ..............................
Camp Blanding .........................................
$15,524,000 
......................................
Jacksonville ...............................................
$12,200,000 
Idaho ................................
Gowen Field ..............................................
$7,615,000 
......................................
Orchard Training Area .............................
$1,700,000 
Illinois ...............................
St. Clair County ........................................
$8,100,000 
Indiana .............................
Muscatatuck ..............................................
$4,996,000 
Iowa ..................................
Iowa City ...................................................
$13,186,000 
Kentucky ..........................
London ......................................................
$2,427,000 
Michigan ...........................
Camp Grayling ..........................................
$2,450,000 
......................................
Lansing ......................................................
$4,239,000 
Minnesota .........................
Camp Ripley ..............................................
$17,450,000 
Mississippi ........................
Camp Shelby .............................................
$4,000,000 
Missouri ............................
Whiteman Air Force Base ........................
$30,000,000 
North Carolina .................
Asheville .....................................................
$3,733,000 
North Dakota ...................
Camp Grafton ............................................
$33,416,000 
Oregon ..............................
Ontario ......................................................
$11,000,000 
Pennsylvania .....................
Carlisle .......................................................
$7,800,000 
......................................
East Fallowfield Township ........................
$8,300,000 
......................................
Fort Indiantown Gap ................................
$9,500,000 
......................................
Gettysburg .................................................
$6,300,000 
......................................
Graterford .................................................
$7,300,000 
......................................
Hanover .....................................................
$5,500,000 
......................................
Hazelton ....................................................
$5,600,000 
......................................
Holidaysburg .............................................
$9,400,000 
......................................
Huntingdon ...............................................
$7,500,000 
......................................
Kutztown ...................................................
$6,800,000 
......................................
Lebanon .....................................................
$7,800,000 
......................................
Philadelphia ...............................................
$13,650,000 
...........................................
Waynesburg ...............................................
$9,000,000 
Rhode Island ....................
East Greenwich .........................................
$8,200,000 
......................................
North Kingstown .......................................
$33,000,000 
Texas ................................
Camp Bowie ..............................................
$1,500,000 
......................................
Fort Wolters ..............................................
$2,100,000 
Utah .................................
North Salt Lake ........................................
$12,200,000 
Vermont ............................
Ethan Allen Range ....................................
$1,996,000 
Virginia .............................
Fort Pickett ...............................................
$26,211,000 
......................................
Winchester .................................................
$3,113,000 
West Virginia ...................
Camp Dawson ...........................................
$9,400,000 
Wyoming ...........................
Camp Guernsey .........................................
$2,650,000
1325 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(1)(B), the Sec-
retary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army Reserve 
locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ..........................
BT Collins .................................................
$6,874,000 
...........................................
Fort Hunter Liggett .................................
$7,035,000 
......................................
Garden Grove ............................................
$25,440,000 
Montana ...........................
Butte .........................................................
$7,629,000 
New Jersey .......................
Fort Dix ....................................................
$22,900,000 
New York .........................
Fort Drum .................................................
$15,923,000 
Texas ................................
Ellington Field ..........................................
$15,000,000 
......................................
Fort Worth ................................................
$15,076,000 
Wisconsin .........................
Ellsworth ...................................................
$9,100,000 
......................................
Fort McCoy ...............................................
$8,523,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(a)(2), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve 
and Marine Corps Reserve locations, and in the amounts, 
set forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ..........................
Miramar .....................................................
$5,580,000 
Michigan ...........................
Selfridge ....................................................
$4,030,000
1326 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Ohio ..................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base .............
$10,277,000 
Oregon ..............................
Portland .....................................................
$1,900,000 
South Dakota ...................
Sioux Falls ................................................
$3,730,000 
Texas ................................
Austin ........................................................
$6,490,000 
......................................
Fort Worth ................................................
$27,484,000 
Virginia .............................
Quantico ....................................................
$2,410,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(3)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air Na-
tional Guard locations, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Colorado ..........................
Buckley Air National Guard Base ...........
$7,300,000 
Delaware ..........................
New Castle ...............................................
$10,800,000 
Florida .............................
Jacksonville International Airport ...........
$6,000,000 
Georgia ............................
Savannah International Airport ...............
$9,000,000 
Indiana ............................
Hulman Regional Airport ........................
$7,700,000 
Kansas .............................
Smoky Hill Air National Guard Range ...
$9,000,000 
Louisiana .........................
Camp Beauregard ....................................
$1,800,000 
Massachusetts ..................
Otis Air National Guard Base .................
$1,800,000 
.....................................
Barnes Air National Guard Base ............
$7,300,000 
Mississippi .......................
Key Field ..................................................
$6,100,000 
Nebraska .........................
Lincoln .....................................................
$8,900,000 
Nevada .............................
Reno-Tahoe International Airport ...........
$5,200,000 
New Hampshire ...............
Pease Air National Guard Base ...............
$8,900,000 
New Jersey ......................
Atlantic City .............................................
$9,800,000 
New York .........................
Gabreski Airport ......................................
$8,400,000 
.....................................
Griffiss ......................................................
$6,600,000 
..........................................
Hancock Field ..........................................
$5,100,000 
North Carolina ................
Charlotte ...................................................
$4,000,000 
Ohio .................................
Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base ..
$7,600,000 
Pennsylvania ....................
Fort Indiantown Gap ...............................
$12,700,000 
.....................................
Harrisburg ................................................
$1,000,000 
Rhode Island ...................
Quonset State Airport ..............................
$5,000,000 
South Dakota ..................
Joe Foss Field ..........................................
$7,900,000 
Tennessee ........................
Lovell Field ..............................................
$8,200,000 
..........................................
McGhee-Tyson Airport .............................
$3,200,000 
.....................................
Memphis International Airport ................
$11,376,000 
Texas ...............................
Ellington Field .........................................
$7,200,000 
Vermont ...........................
Burlington ................................................
$6,600,000 
West Virginia ..................
Eastern WV Regional Airport ..................
$50,776,000
1327 
Air National Guard—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
.....................................
Yeager ......................................................
$17,300,000 
Wisconsin .........................
Truax Field ..............................................
$7,000,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(3)(B), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the Air Force 
Reserve locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alaska ...............................
Elmendorf Air Force Base ........................
$14,950,000 
Utah .................................
Hill Air Force Base ...................................
$3,200,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2007, for the 
costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, 
and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve 
Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 
1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost 
of acquisition of land for those facilities), in the following 
amounts: 
(1) For the Department of the Army—
1331 
Army National Guard: Extension of 2004 Project 
Authorizations—Continued 
Installation or Location 
Project 
Amount 
Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania 
Multi-purpose training range 
$15,338,000 
TITLE XXVII—BASE CLOSURE 
AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES 
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base closure and realignment ac-
tivities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 
Account 1990. 
Sec. 2702. Authorized base closure and realignment activities funded through 
Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base closure and realignment ac-
tivities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 
Account 2005. 
Sec. 2704. Authorized cost and scope of work variations for military construc-
tion and military family housing projects related to base clo-
sures and realignments. 
Sec. 2705. Transfer of funds from Department of Defense Base Closure Ac-
count 2005 to Department of Defense Housing Funds. 
Sec. 2706. Comprehensive accounting of funding required to ensure timely im-
plementation of 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
Commission recommendations. 
Sec. 2707. Relocation of units from Roberts United States Army Reserve Cen-
ter and Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Baton Rouge, 
Louisiana. 
Sec. 2708. Acquisition of real property, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, as part of the 
realignment of the installation. 
Sec. 2709. Report on availability of traffic infrastructure and facilities to sup-
port base realignment. 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2007, for base 
closure and realignment activities, including real property 
acquisition and military construction projects, as author-
ized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act
1332 
of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 
10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by sec-
tion 2906 of such Act, in the total amount of 
$295,689,000, as follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$98,716,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$50,000,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$143,260,000. 
(4) For the Defense Agencies, $3,713,000. 
SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGN-
MENT ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AC-
COUNT 2005. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2703, the Secretary 
of Defense may carry out base closure and realignment 
activities, including real property acquisition and military 
construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 
XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and 
funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure
1333 
Account 2005 established by section 2906A of such Act, 
in the amount of $8,718,988,000. 
SEC. 2703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2007, for base closure and 
realignment activities, including real property acquisition 
and military construction projects, as authorized by the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part 
A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 
note) and funded through the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A 
of such Act, in the total amount of $8,040,401,000, as 
follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$4,015,746,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$733,695,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$1,183,812,000. 
(4) For the Defense Agencies, $2,241,062,000.
1334 
(b) GENERAL REDUCTION.—The amount otherwise 
authorized to be appropriated by subsection (a) is reduced 
by $133,914,000. 
SEC. 2704. AUTHORIZED COST AND SCOPE OF WORK VARI-
ATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND 
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS RE-
LATED TO BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGN-
MENTS. 
(a) VARIATIONS AUTHORIZED.—Section 2905A of 
the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(f) AUTHORIZED COST AND SCOPE OF WORK VARI-
ATIONS.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the cost 
authorized for a military construction project or military 
family housing project to be carried out using funds in 
the Account may not be increased or reduced by more than 
20 percent or $2,000,000, whichever is greater, of the 
amount specified for the project in the conference report 
to accompany the Military Construction Authorization Act 
authorizing the project. The scope of work for such a 
project may not be reduced by more than 25 percent from 
the scope specified in the most recent budget documents 
for the projects listed in such conference report.
1335 
‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a military con-
struction project or military family housing project to be 
carried out using funds in the Account with an estimated 
cost of less than $5,000,000, unless the project has not 
been previously identified in any budget submission for the 
Account and exceeds the applicable minor construction 
threshold under section 2805 of title 10, United States 
Code. 
‘‘(3) The limitation on cost or scope variation in para-
graph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense 
makes a determination that an increase or reduction in 
cost or a reduction in the scope of work for a military 
construction project or military family housing project to 
be carried out using funds in the Account needs to be 
made for the sole purpose of meeting unusual variations 
in cost or scope. If the Secretary makes such a determina-
tion, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense 
committees of the variation in cost or scope not later than 
21 days before the date on which the variation is made 
in connection with the project or, if the notification is pro-
vided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of 
title 10, United States Code, not later than 14 days before 
the date on which the variation is made. The Secretary 
shall include the reasons for the variation in the notifica-
tion.’’.
1336 
(b) REPORT
ON EXISTING PROJECTS.—Not later 
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report specifying all military con-
struction projects and military family housing projects 
carried out using funds in the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 2005 for which a cost or scope of 
work variation was made before that date that would have 
been subject to subsection (f) of section 2905A of the De-
fense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as 
added by this section, if such subsection had been in effect 
when the cost or scope of work variation was made. The 
Secretary shall include a description of each variation cov-
ered by the report and the reasons for the variation. 
SEC. 2705. TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005 TO 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HOUSING FUNDS. 
(a) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Subsection (c) of sec-
tion 2883 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(G) Subject to subsection (f), any amounts 
that the Secretary of Defense transfers to that Fund 
from amounts in the Department of Defense Base 
Closure Account 2005.’’; and
1337 
(2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(G) Subject to subsection (f), any amounts 
that the Secretary of Defense transfers to that Fund 
from amounts in the Department of Defense Base 
Closure Account 2005.’’. 
(b) NOTIFICATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANS-
FER.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B) or (2)(B)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (B) or (G) of para-
graph (1) or subparagraph (B) or (G) of paragraph 
(2)’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘In addition, the notice required in connection 
with a transfer under subparagraph (G) of para-
graph (1) or subparagraph (G) of paragraph (2) 
shall include a certification that the amounts to be 
transferred from the Department of Defense Base 
Closure Account 2005 were specified in the con-
ference report to accompany the most recent Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act.’’.
1338 
SEC. 2706. COMPREHENSIVE ACCOUNTING OF FUNDING RE-
QUIRED TO ENSURE TIMELY IMPLEMENTA-
TION OF 2005 DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND 
REALIGNMENT COMMISSION RECOMMENDA-
TIONS. 
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress 
with the budget materials for fiscal year 2009 a com-
prehensive accounting of the funding required to ensure 
that the plan for implementing the final recommendations 
of the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Com-
mission remains on schedule for completion by September 
15, 2011, as required by section 2904(c)(5) of the Defense 
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 
XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 
SEC. 2707. RELOCATION OF UNITS FROM ROBERTS UNITED 
STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTER AND NAVY- 
MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER, BATON 
ROUGE, LOUISIANA. 
The Secretary of the Army may use funds appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 2703 for the purpose 
of siting an Army Reserve Center and Navy and Marine 
Corps Reserve Center on land under the control of the 
State of Louisiana adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, the 
Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport in Baton Rouge, Lou-
isiana, at a location determined by the Secretary to be
1339 
in the best interest of national security and in the public 
interest. 
SEC. 
2708. 
ACQUISITION 
OF 
REAL 
PROPERTY, 
FORT 
BELVOIR, VIRGINIA, AS PART OF THE RE-
ALIGNMENT OF THE INSTALLATION. 
(a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to section 
2905(a)(1)(A) of the Defense Base Closure and Realign-
ment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), the relocation of mem-
bers of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the 
Department of Defense who are scheduled to be relocated 
to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, shall be limited to the following 
locations: 
(1) Fort Belvoir. 
(2) A parcel of real property consisting of ap-
proximately 69.5 acres, under the administrative ju-
risdiction of the Administrator of General Services 
(in this section referred to as the ‘‘Administrator’’) 
and containing warehouse facilities in Springfield, 
Virginia (in this section referred to as the ‘‘GSA 
Property’’). 
(3) Any other parcels of land (using including 
any improvement thereon) that are acquired, using 
competitive procedures, in fee in the vicinity of Fort 
Belvoir.
1340 
(b) ACQUISITION SELECTION CRITERIA.—The Sec-
retary of the Army shall select the site to be used under 
subsection (a) based on the best value to the Government, 
and, in making that determination, the Secretary shall 
consider cost and schedule. 
(c) GSA PROPERTY TRANSFER AUTHORIZED.—Pur-
suant to the relocation alternative authorized by sub-
section (a)(2), the Administrator may transfer the GSA 
Property to the administrative jurisdiction of the Sec-
retary of the Army for the purpose of permitting the Sec-
retary to construct facilities on the property to support 
administrative functions to be located at Fort Belvoir, Vir-
ginia. 
(d) IMPLEMENTATION OF GSA PROPERTY TRANS-
FER.— 
(1) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the 
transfer of the GSA Property under subsection (c), 
the Secretary of the Army shall— 
(A) pay all reasonable costs to move per-
sonnel, furnishings, equipment, and other mate-
rial related to the relocation of functions identi-
fied by the Administrator; and 
(B) if determined to be necessary by the 
Administrator—
1341 
(i) transfer to the administrative ju-
risdiction of the Administrator a parcel of 
property in the National Capital Region 
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary and 
determined to be suitable by the Adminis-
trator; 
(ii) design and construct storage fa-
cilities, utilities, security measures, and ac-
cess to a road infrastructure on the parcel 
transferred under clause (i) to meet the re-
quirements of the Administrator; and 
(iii) enter into a memorandum of 
agreement with the Administrator for sup-
port services and security at the new facili-
ties constructed pursuant to clause (ii). 
(2) EQUAL VALUE TRANSFER.—As a condition 
of the transfer of the GSA Property under sub-
section (c), the transfer agreement shall provide that 
the fair market value of the GSA Property and the 
consideration provided under paragraph (1) shall be 
equal or, if not equal, shall be equalized through the 
use of a cash equalization payment. 
(3) DESCRIPTION
OF
PROPERTY.—The exact 
acreage and legal description of the GSA Property
1342 
shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the 
Administrator and the Secretary of the Army. 
(4) CONGRESSIONAL
NOTICE.—Before under-
taking an activity under subsection (c) that would 
require approval of a prospectus under section 3307 
of title 40, United States Code, the Administrator 
shall provide to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate, and the congressional defense commit-
tees a written notice containing a description of the 
activity to be undertaken. 
(5) NO EFFECT ON COMPLIANCE WITH ENVI-
RONMENTAL LAWS.—Nothing in this section or sub-
section (c) may be construed to affect or limit the 
application of or obligation to comply with any envi-
ronmental law, including section 120(h) of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)). 
(6) ADDITIONAL
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS.— 
The Administrator and the Secretary of the Army 
may require such additional terms and conditions in 
connection with the GSA Property transfer as the 
Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary, 
determines appropriate to protect the interests of
1343 
the United States and further the purposes of this 
section. 
(e) ADMINISTRATION
OF TRANSFERRED
OR AC-
QUIRED PROPERTY.—Upon completion of any property 
transfer or acquisition authorized by subsection (a), the 
property shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Army as a part of Fort Belvoir. 
(f) STATUS REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2008, 
the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the status and esti-
mated costs of implementing subsection (a). 
SEC. 2709. REPORT ON AVAILABILITY OF TRAFFIC INFRA-
STRUCTURE AND FACILITIES TO SUPPORT 
BASE REALIGNMENT. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.— 
(1) 
DESIGNATION
OF
DEFENSE
ACCESS 
ROADS.—It is the sense of Congress that roads lead-
ing onto Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and other military 
installations that will be significantly impacted by an 
increase in the number of members of the Armed 
Forces and civilian employees of the Department of 
Defense assigned to the installation as a result of 
the 2005 round of defense base closures and realign-
ments under the Defense Base Closure and Realign-
ment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public
1344 
Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) or any other 
significant impact resulting from a realignment of 
forces should be considered for designation as de-
fense access roads for purposes of section 210 of 
title 23, United States Code. 
(2) FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE.—It is 
the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 
should seek to ensure that the permanent facilities 
and infrastructure necessary to support the mission 
of the Armed Forces and the quality of life needs of 
members of the Armed Forces, civilian employees, 
and their families are ready for use at receiving loca-
tions before units are transferred to such locations 
as a result of the 2005 round of defense base clo-
sures and realignments. 
(b) STUDY
OF MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE
AND 
SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE.—Not 
later than April 1, 2008, the Comptroller General shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
with regard to each military installation that will be sig-
nificantly impacted by an increase in assigned forces or 
civilian personnel, as described in subsection (a), for the 
purpose of determining whether—
1345 
(1) military facility requirements (including 
quality of life projects) will be met before the arrival 
of assigned forces; and 
(2) the Department of Defense has pro-
grammed sufficient funding to mitigate community 
traffic congestion in accordance with the defense ac-
cess roads program under section 210 of title 23, 
United States Code. 
TITLE 
XXVIII—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION GENERAL PROVI-
SIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 
Changes 
Sec. 2801. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction 
projects outside the United States. 
Sec. 2802. Clarification of requirement for authorization of military construc-
tion. 
Sec. 2803. Increase in thresholds for unspecified minor military construction 
projects. 
Sec. 2804. Temporary authority to support revitalization of Department of De-
fense laboratories through unspecified minor military construc-
tion projects. 
Sec. 2805. Extension of authority to accept equalization payments for facility 
exchanges. 
Sec. 2806. Modifications of authority to lease military family housing. 
Sec. 2807. Expansion of authority to exchange reserve component facilities. 
Sec. 2808. Limitation on use of alternative authority for acquisition and im-
provement of military housing for privatization of temporary 
lodging facilities. 
Sec. 2809. Two-year extension of temporary program to use minor military con-
struction authority for construction of child development cen-
ters. 
Sec. 2810. Report on housing privatization initiatives. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 
Sec. 2821. Requirement to report real property transactions resulting in annual 
costs of more than $750,000. 
Sec. 2822. Continued consolidation of real property provisions without sub-
stantive change. 
Sec. 2823. Modification of authority to lease non-excess property of the military 
departments.
1346 
Sec. 2824. Cooperative agreement authority for management of cultural re-
sources on certain sites outside military installations. 
Sec. 2825. Agreements to limit encroachments and other constraints on mili-
tary training, testing, and operations. 
Sec. 2826. Expansion to all military departments of Army pilot program for 
purchase of certain municipal services for military installations. 
Sec. 2827. Prohibition on commercial flights into Selfridge Air National Guard 
Base. 
Sec. 2828. Sense of Congress on Department of Defense actions to protect in-
stallations, ranges, and military airspace from encroachment. 
Sec. 2829. Reports on Army and Marine Corps operational ranges. 
Sec. 2830. Niagara Air Reserve Base, New York, basing report. 
Sec. 2831. Report on the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado. 
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances 
Sec. 2841. Modification of conveyance authority, Marine Corps Base, Camp 
Pendleton, California. 
Sec. 2842. Grant of easement, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. 
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Lynn Haven Fuel Depot, Lynn Haven, Florida. 
Sec. 2844. Modification of lease of property, National Flight Academy at the 
National Museum of Naval Aviation, Naval Air Station, Pensa-
cola, Florida. 
Sec. 2845. Land exchange, Detroit, Michigan. 
Sec. 2846. Transfer of jurisdiction, former Nike missile site, Grosse Ile, Michi-
gan. 
Sec. 2847. Modification to land conveyance authority, Fort Bragg, North Caro-
lina. 
Sec. 2848. Land conveyance, Lewis and Clark United States Army Reserve 
Center, Bismarck, North Dakota. 
Sec. 2849. Land exchange, Fort Hood, Texas. 
Subtitle D—Energy Security 
Sec. 2861. Repeal of congressional notification requirement regarding cancella-
tion ceiling for Department of Defense energy savings perform-
ance contracts. 
Sec. 2862. Definition of alternative fueled vehicle. 
Sec. 2863. Use of energy efficient lighting fixtures and bulbs in Department of 
Defense facilities. 
Sec. 2864. Reporting requirements relating to renewable energy use by Depart-
ment of Defense to meet Department electricity needs. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 2871. Revised deadline for transfer of Arlington Naval Annex to Arlington 
National Cemetery. 
Sec. 2872. Transfer of jurisdiction over Air Force Memorial to Department of 
the Air Force. 
Sec. 2873. Report on plans to replace the monument at the Tomb of the Un-
knowns at Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia. 
Sec. 2874. Increased authority for repair, restoration, and preservation of La-
fayette Escadrille Memorial, Marnes-la-Coquette, France. 
Sec. 2875. Addition of Woonsocket local protection project. 
Sec. 2876. Repeal of moratorium on improvements at Fort Buchanan, Puerto 
Rico.
1347 
Sec. 2877. Establishment of national military working dog teams monument on 
suitable military installation. 
Sec. 2878. Report required prior to removal of missiles from 564th Missile 
Squadron. 
Sec. 2879. Report on condition of schools under jurisdiction of Department of 
Defense Education Activity. 
Sec. 2880. Report on facilities and operations of Darnall Army Medical Center, 
Fort Hood Military Reservation, Texas. 
Sec. 2881. Report on feasibility of establishing a regional disaster response cen-
ter at Kelly Air Field, San Antonio, Texas. 
Sec. 2882. Naming of housing facility at Fort Carson, Colorado, in honor of 
the Honorable Joel Hefley, a former member of the United 
States House of Representatives. 
Sec. 2883. Naming of Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Center at Rock Island, 
Illinois, in honor of the Honorable Lane Evans, a former mem-
ber of the United States House of Representatives. 
Sec. 2884. Naming of research laboratory at Air Force Rome Research Site, 
Rome, New York, in honor of the Honorable Sherwood L. 
Boehlert, a former member of the United States House of Rep-
resentatives. 
Sec. 2885. Naming of administration building at Joint Systems Manufacturing 
Center, Lima, Ohio, in honor of the Honorable Michael G. 
Oxley, a former member of the United States House of Rep-
resentatives. 
Sec. 2886. Naming of Logistics Automation Training Facility, Army Quarter-
master Center and School, Fort Lee, Virginia, in honor of Gen-
eral Richard H. Thompson. 
Sec. 2887. Authority to relocate Joint Spectrum Center to Fort Meade, Mary-
land. 
Subtitle A—Military Construction 
Program and Military Family 
Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. AUTHORITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTE-
NANCE 
FUNDS 
FOR 
CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Sub-
section (a) of section 2808 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of 
Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as amended by sec-
tion 2810 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375;
1350 
out using such funds after the date of the enactment of 
this Act notwithstanding such subsection (g). 
SEC. 2802. CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR AU-
THORIZATION OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 
(a) CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR AUTHOR-
IZATION.—Section 2802(a) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after ‘‘military construction 
projects’’ the following: ‘‘, land acquisitions, and defense 
access road projects (as described under section 210 of 
title 23)’’. 
(b) 
CLARIFICATION
OF
DEFINITION.—Section 
2801(a) of such title is amended by inserting after ‘‘per-
manent requirements’’ the following: ‘‘, or any acquisition 
of land or construction of a defense access road (as de-
scribed in section 210 of title 23)’’. 
SEC. 2803. INCREASE IN THRESHOLDS FOR UNSPECIFIED 
MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 
Section 2805(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ‘‘$1,500,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$2,000,000’’.
1351 
SEC. 2804. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT REVITAL-
IZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LAB-
ORATORIES THROUGH UNSPECIFIED MINOR 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 
(a) LABORATORY REVITALIZATION.—Section 2805 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub-
section (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol-
lowing new subsection (d): 
‘‘(d) LABORATORY REVITALIZATION.—(1) For the 
revitalization and recapitalization of laboratories owned by 
the United States and under the jurisdiction of the Sec-
retary concerned, the Secretary concerned may obligate 
and expend— 
‘‘(A) from appropriations available to the Sec-
retary concerned for operation and maintenance, 
amounts necessary to carry out an unspecified minor 
military construction project costing not more than 
$2,000,000; or 
‘‘(B) from appropriations available to the Sec-
retary concerned for military construction not other-
wise authorized by law, amounts necessary to carry 
out an unspecified minor military construction 
project costing not more than $4,000,000.
1352 
‘‘(2) For an unspecified minor military construction 
project conducted pursuant to this subsection, $2,000,000 
shall be deemed to be the amount specified in subsection 
(b)(1) regarding when advance approval of the project by 
the Secretary concerned and congressional notification is 
required. The Secretary of Defense shall establish proce-
dures for the review and approval of requests from the 
Secretary of a military department to carry out a con-
struction project under this subsection. 
‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the total 
amount allowed to be applied in any one fiscal year to 
projects at any one laboratory shall be limited to the larger 
of the amounts applicable under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(4) Not later than February 1, 2010, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report on the use of the authority provided by 
this subsection. The report shall include a list and descrip-
tion of the construction projects carried out under this 
subsection, including the location and cost of each project. 
‘‘(5) In this subsection, the term ‘laboratory’ in-
cludes— 
‘‘(A) a research, engineering, and development 
center; and 
‘‘(B) a test and evaluation activity.
1353 
‘‘(6) The authority to carry out a project under this 
subsection expires on September 30, 2012.’’. 
(b) STYLISTIC AMENDMENTS.—Such section is fur-
ther amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘AUTHORITY 
TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; 
(2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘APPROVAL 
AND
CONGRESSIONAL
NOTIFICATION.—’’ 
after 
‘‘(b)’’; 
(3) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘USE OF OP-
ERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE
FUNDS.—’’ after 
‘‘(c)’’; and 
(4) in subsection (e), as redesignated by sub-
section (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘PROHIBITION ON USE 
FOR NEW HOUSING UNITS.—’’ after ‘‘(e)’’. 
SEC. 2805. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT EQUALI-
ZATION 
PAYMENTS 
FOR 
FACILITY 
EX-
CHANGES. 
Section 2809(c)(5) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public 
Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2127) is amended by striking 
‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 
2010’’.
1354 
SEC. 2806. MODIFICATIONS OF AUTHORITY TO LEASE MILI-
TARY FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) INCREASED MAXIMUM LEASE AMOUNT APPLICA-
BLE
TO CERTAIN DOMESTIC ARMY FAMILY HOUSING 
LEASES.—Subsection (b) of section 2828 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘paragraphs 
(3) and (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (3), (4), and 
(7)’’; 
(2) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘paragraphs 
(2) and (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2), (3), and 
(7)’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(7)(A) Not more than 600 housing units may be 
leased by the Secretary of the Army under subsection (a) 
for which the expenditure for the rental of such units (in-
cluding the cost of utilities, maintenance, and operation) 
exceeds the maximum amount per unit per year in effect 
under paragraph (2) but does not exceed $18,620 per unit 
per year, as adjusted from time to time under paragraph 
(5). 
‘‘(B) The maximum lease amount provided in sub-
paragraph (A) shall apply only to Army family housing 
in areas designated by the Secretary of the Army.
1355 
‘‘(C) The term of a lease under subparagraph (A) 
may not exceed 2 years.’’. 
(b) 
FOREIGN
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING 
LEASES.—Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended by 
striking ‘‘the Secretary of the Navy may lease not more 
than 2,800 units of family housing in Italy, and the Sec-
retary of the Army may lease not more than 500 units 
of family housing in Italy’’ and inserting ‘‘the Secretaries 
of the military departments may lease not more than 
3,300 units of family housing in Italy’’. 
(c) INCREASED THRESHOLD FOR CONGRESSIONAL 
NOTIFICATION FOR FOREIGN MILITARY FAMILY HOUS-
ING LEASES.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended 
by striking ‘‘$500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 
(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 
2008, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the con-
gressional defense committees a report on the rental of 
family housing in foreign countries (including the costs of 
utilities, maintenance, and operations) that exceed 
$60,000 per unit per year. The report shall include a list 
and description of rental units (including total gross 
square feet and number of bedrooms), location, rental 
cost, the requirement for the rental, and the options that 
the Secretary has available to decrease the costs associated 
with the rentals.
1356 
SEC. 2807. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO EXCHANGE RE-
SERVE COMPONENT FACILITIES. 
Section 18240(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘with a State’’ in the first sentence 
and inserting ‘‘with an Executive agency (as defined in 
section 105 of title 5), the United States Postal Service, 
or a State’’. 
SEC. 2808. LIMITATION ON USE OF ALTERNATIVE AUTHOR-
ITY FOR ACQUISITION AND IMPROVEMENT 
OF MILITARY HOUSING FOR PRIVATIZATION 
OF TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITIES. 
(a) LIMITATION ON PRIVATIZATION OF TEMPORARY 
LODGING FACILITIES.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United 
States Code, the privatization of temporary lodging facili-
ties under such subchapter is limited to the military instal-
lations authorized in subsection (b) until 120 days after 
the date on which the report described in subsection (d)(1) 
is submitted. 
(b) AUTHORIZED INSTALLATIONS.—The military in-
stallations at which the privatization of temporary lodging 
facilities may proceed under subsection (a) are the fol-
lowing: 
(1) Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. 
(2) Fort Rucker, Alabama. 
(3) Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.
1357 
(4) Fort McNair, District of Columbia. 
(5) Fort Shafter, Hawaii. 
(6) Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii. 
(7) Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. 
(8) Fort Riley, Kansas. 
(9) Fort Polk, Louisiana. 
(10) Fort Sill, Oklahoma. 
(11) Fort Hood, Texas. 
(12) Fort Sam Houston, Texas. 
(13) Fort Myer, Virginia. 
(c) EFFECT
OF LIMITATION.—The limitation im-
posed by subsection (a) prohibits the issuance of contract 
solicitations for the privatization of temporary lodging fa-
cilities at any military installation not specified in sub-
section (b). 
(d) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— 
(1) REPORT BY SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.— 
Not earlier than eight months after the date on 
which the notice of transfer associated with the mili-
tary installations specified in subsection (b) is 
issued, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees and the Comp-
troller General a report that—
1358 
(A) describes the implementation of the 
privatization of temporary lodging facilities at 
the installations specified in subsection (b); 
(B) evaluates the efficiency of the pro-
gram; and 
(C) contains such recommendations as the 
Secretary considers appropriate regarding ex-
pansion of the program. 
(2) REPORT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL.—Not 
later than 90 days after receiving the report under 
paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a review of 
both the privatization of temporary lodging facilities 
and the report of the Secretary. 
SEC. 2809. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PRO-
GRAM TO USE MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of section 2810 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3510) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and 
inserting ‘‘September 30, 2009’’.
1359 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Subsection (d) of such sec-
tion is amended by striking ‘‘March 1, 2007’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘March 1, 2009’’. 
SEC. 2810. REPORT ON HOUSING PRIVATIZATION INITIA-
TIVES. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 31, 
2008, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Com-
mittees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report containing— 
(1) a list of all housing privatization trans-
actions carried out by the Department of Defense 
that, as of such date, are behind schedule or in de-
fault; and 
(2) recommendations regarding the opportuni-
ties for the Federal Government to ensure that all 
terms of each housing privatization transaction are 
completed according to the original schedule and 
budget. 
(b) SPECIFIC
INFORMATION
REGARDING
EACH 
TRANSACTION.—For each housing privatization trans-
action included in the report required by subsection (a), 
the report shall provide a description of the following: 
(1) The reasons for schedule delays, cost over-
runs, or default.
1360 
(2) How solicitations and competitions were 
conducted for the project. 
(3) How financing, partnerships, legal arrange-
ments, leases, or contracts in relation to the project 
were structured. 
(4) Which entities, including Federal entities, 
are bearing financial risk for the project, and to 
what extent. 
(5) The remedies available to the Federal Gov-
ernment to restore the transaction to schedule or en-
sure completion of the terms of the transaction in 
question at the earliest possible time. 
(6) The extent to which the Federal Govern-
ment has the ability to affect the performance of 
various parties involved in the project. 
(7) The remedies available to subcontractors to 
recoup liens in the case of default, non-payment by 
the developer or other party to the transaction or 
lease agreement, or re-structuring. 
(8) The remedies available to the Federal Gov-
ernment to affect receivership actions or transfer of 
ownership of the project. 
(9) The names of the developers for the project 
and any history of previous defaults or bankruptcies 
by these developers or their affiliates.
1361 
(c) HOUSING PRIVATIZATION TRANSACTION DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘housing privatization 
transaction’’ means any contract or other transaction for 
the construction or acquisition of military family housing 
or military unaccompanied housing entered into under the 
authority of subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, 
United States Code. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and 
Facilities Administration 
SEC. 2821. REQUIREMENT TO REPORT REAL PROPERTY 
TRANSACTIONS 
RESULTING 
IN 
ANNUAL 
COSTS OF MORE THAN $750,000. 
(a) INCLUSION OF TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DE-
FENSE AGENCIES.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT TO REPORT.—Subsection (a) 
of section 2662 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, or his 
designee,’’ and inserting ‘‘or, with respect to a 
Defense Agency, the Secretary of Defense’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by inserting after 
‘‘military department’’ the following: ‘‘or the 
Secretary of Defense’’. 
(2) 
ANNUAL
REPORT
REGARDING
MINOR 
TRANSACTIONS.—Subsection (b) of such section is
1362 
amended by inserting after ‘‘military department’’ 
the following: ‘‘and, with respect to Defense Agen-
cies, the Secretary of Defense’’. 
(3) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (g) of such sec-
tion is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) In this subsection, the term ‘Secretary con-
cerned’ includes, with respect to Defense Agencies, the 
Secretary of Defense.’’. 
(b) INCLUSION
OF ADDITIONAL TRANSACTION.— 
Subsection (a)(1) of such section is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(G) Any transaction or contract action that re-
sults in, or includes, the acquisition or use by, or the 
lease or license to, the United States of real prop-
erty, if the estimated annual rental or cost for the 
use of the real property is more than $750,000.’’. 
SEC. 2822. CONTINUED CONSOLIDATION OF REAL PROP-
ERTY PROVISIONS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIVE 
CHANGE. 
(a) CONSOLIDATION.—Section 2663 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection: 
‘‘(h) LAND ACQUISITION OPTIONS IN ADVANCE OF 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.—(1) The Secretary
1363 
of a military department may acquire an option on a par-
cel of real property before or after its acquisition is au-
thorized by law, if the Secretary considers it suitable and 
likely to be needed for a military project of the military 
department under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. 
‘‘(2) As consideration for an option acquired under 
paragraph (1), the Secretary may pay, from funds avail-
able to the military department under the jurisdiction of 
the Secretary for real property activities, an amount that 
is not more than 12 percent of the appraised fair market 
value of the property.’’. 
(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISION.— 
(1) REPEAL.—Section 2677 of such title is re-
pealed. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
tions at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title 
is amended by striking the item relating to section 
2677. 
SEC. 2823. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO LEASE NON- 
EXCESS PROPERTY OF THE MILITARY DE-
PARTMENTS. 
(a) ELIMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT FACILI-
TIES
OPERATION
SUPPORT
AS
IN-KIND
CONSIDER-
ATION.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 2667 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended—
1364 
(1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub-
paragraph (F); and 
(2) by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting 
the following new subparagraphs: 
‘‘(D) Provision or payment of utility services 
for the Secretary concerned. 
‘‘(E) Provision of real property maintenance 
services for the Secretary concerned.’’. 
(b) ELIMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE RENTAL 
AND CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDS FOR FACILITIES OPER-
ATION SUPPORT.—Subsection (e)(1)(C) of such section is 
amended— 
(1) by adjusting the margins of clauses (ii) and 
(iii) to conform to the margin of clause (i); and 
(2) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the fol-
lowing new clauses: 
‘‘(iv) Payment of utility services. 
‘‘(v) Real property maintenance services.’’. 
(c) USE OF COMPETITIVE PROCEDURES FOR SELEC-
TION OF CERTAIN LESSEES.—Subsection (h) of such sec-
tion is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘exceeds one 
year, and the fair market value of the lease’’ and in-
serting ‘‘exceeds one year, or the fair market value 
of the lease’’;
1365 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (4); and 
(3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply if the Secretary 
concerned determines that— 
‘‘(A) a public interest will be served as a result 
of the lease; and 
‘‘(B) the use of competitive procedures for the 
selection of certain lessees is unobtainable or not 
compatible with the public benefit served under sub-
paragraph (A). 
‘‘(3) Not later than 45 days before entering into a 
lease described in paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned 
shall submit to Congress written notice describing the 
terms of the proposed lease and— 
‘‘(A) the competitive procedures used to select 
the lessee; or 
‘‘(B) in the case of a lease involving the public 
benefit exception authorized by paragraph (2), a de-
scription of the public benefit to be served by the 
lease.’’. 
(d) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO PRIOR- 
YEAR AMENDMENT.—Subsection (e) of such section is 
amended—
1366 
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘para-
graph (4), (5), or (6)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3), 
(4), or (5)’’; and 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and 
(6) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5). 
SEC. 2824. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AUTHORITY FOR 
MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES ON 
CERTAIN SITES OUTSIDE MILITARY INSTAL-
LATIONS. 
(a) EXPANDED AUTHORITY.—Section 2684 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘on military 
installations’’ and inserting ‘‘located on a site au-
thorized by subsection (b)’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 
subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and 
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol-
lowing new subsection (b): 
‘‘(b) AUTHORIZED CULTURAL RESOURCES SITES.— 
To be covered by a cooperative agreement under sub-
section (a), cultural resources must be located— 
‘‘(1) on a military installation; or 
‘‘(2) on a site outside of a military installation, 
but only if the cooperative agreement will directly re-
lieve or eliminate current or anticipated restrictions
1367 
that would or might restrict, impede, or otherwise 
interfere, whether directly or indirectly, with current 
or anticipated military training, testing, or oper-
ations on a military installation.’’. 
(b) CULTURAL RESOURCE DEFINED.—Subsection 
(d) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2), 
is amended by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(5) An Indian sacred site, as defined in section 
1(b)(iii) of Executive Order No. 13007.’’. 
SEC. 2825. AGREEMENTS TO LIMIT ENCROACHMENTS AND 
OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON MILITARY TRAIN-
ING, TESTING, AND OPERATIONS. 
(a) MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF AC-
QUIRED PROPERTY.—Subsection (d) of section 2684a of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), (5), 
and (6) as paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7), respec-
tively; and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing new paragraph (3): 
‘‘(3) An agreement with an eligible entity under this 
section may provide for the management of natural re-
sources on real property in which the Secretary concerned 
acquires any right, title, or interest in accordance with this
1368 
subsection and for the payment by the United States of 
all or a portion of the costs of such natural resource man-
agement if the Secretary concerned determines that there 
is a demonstrated need to preserve or restore habitat for 
the purpose described in subsection (a)(2).’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON PORTION OF ACQUISITION COSTS 
BORNE BY UNITED STATES.—Paragraph (4) of such sub-
section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amend-
ed— 
(1) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub-
paragraph (E); 
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘equal to 
the fair market value’’ and all that follows through 
the period at the end and inserting ‘‘equal to, at the 
discretion of the Secretary concerned— 
‘‘(i) the fair market value of any property or in-
terest in property to be transferred to the United 
States upon the request of the Secretary concerned 
under paragraph (5); or 
‘‘(ii) the cumulative fair market value of all 
properties or interests to be transferred to the 
United States under paragraph (5) pursuant to an 
agreement under subsection (a).’’; and 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol-
lowing new subparagraph:
1369 
‘‘(D) The portion of acquisition costs borne by the 
United States under subparagraph (A) may exceed the 
amount determined under subparagraph (C), but only if— 
‘‘(i) the Secretary concerned provides written 
notice to the Committee on Armed Services of the 
Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the 
House of Representatives containing— 
‘‘(I) a certification by the Secretary that 
the military value to the United States of the 
property or interest to be acquired justifies a 
payment in excess of the fair market value of 
the property or interest; and 
‘‘(II) a description of the military value to 
be obtained; and 
‘‘(ii) the contribution toward the acquisition 
costs of the property or interest is not made until 
at least 14 days after the date on which the notice 
is submitted under clause (i) or, if earlier, at least 
10 days after the date on which a copy of the notice 
is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to sec-
tion 480 of this title.’’.
1370 
SEC. 2826. EXPANSION TO ALL MILITARY DEPARTMENTS OF 
ARMY PILOT PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF 
CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SERVICES FOR MILI-
TARY INSTALLATIONS. 
(a) EXPANSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 325 
of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 10 U.S.C. 
2461 note) is amended— 
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ARMY’’ 
and inserting ‘‘MILITARY’’; 
(2) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Secretary of the Army’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Secretary of a military depart-
ment’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘an Army installation’’ and 
inserting ‘‘a military installation under the ju-
risdiction of the Secretary’’; and 
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘The Sec-
retary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of a military 
department’’. 
(b) PARTICIPATING INSTALLATIONS.—Subsection (c) 
of such section is amended by striking ‘‘two Army installa-
tions’’ and inserting ‘‘three military installations from 
each military service’’.
1371 
(c) EXTENSION OF DURATION OF PROGRAM.—Such 
section is further amended by striking subsections (e) and 
(f) and inserting the following new subsection: 
‘‘(e) TERMINATION OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The pilot 
program shall terminate on September 30, 2012. Any con-
tract entered into under the pilot program shall terminate 
not later than that date.’’. 
SEC. 2827. PROHIBITION ON COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS INTO 
SELFRIDGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE. 
The Secretary of Defense shall prohibit the use of 
Selfridge Air National Guard Base by commercial service 
aircraft. 
SEC. 2828. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE ACTIONS TO PROTECT INSTALLA-
TIONS, RANGES, AND MILITARY AIRSPACE 
FROM ENCROACHMENT. 
(a) FINDINGS.—In light of the initial report of the 
Department of Defense submitted pursuant to section 
2684a(g) of title 10, United States Code, and of the 
RAND Corporation report entitled ‘‘The Thin Green Line: 
An Assessment of DoD’s Readiness and Environmental 
Protection Initiative to Buffer Installation Encroach-
ment’’, Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) Development and loss of habitat in the vi-
cinity of, or in areas ecologically related to, military
1372 
installations, ranges, and airspace pose a continuing 
and significant threat to the readiness of the Armed 
Forces. 
(2) The Range Sustainability Program (RSP) 
of the Department of Defense, and in particular the 
Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative 
(REPI) involving agreements pursuant to section 
2684a of title 10, United States Code, have been ef-
fective in addressing this threat to readiness with re-
gard to a number of important installations, ranges, 
and airspace. 
(3) The opportunities to take effective action to 
protect installations, ranges, and airspace from en-
croachment is in many cases transient, and delay in 
taking action will result in either higher costs or per-
manent loss of the opportunity effectively to address 
encroachment. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Department of Defense should— 
(1) develop additional policy guidance on the 
further implementation of the Readiness and Envi-
ronmental Protection Initiative (REPI), to include 
additional emphasis on protecting biodiversity and 
on further refining procedures;
1373 
(2) give greater emphasis to effective coopera-
tion and collaboration on matters of mutual concern 
with other Federal agencies charged with managing 
Federal land; and 
(3) ensure that each military department takes 
full advantage of the authorities provided by section 
2684a of title 10, United States Code, in addressing 
encroachment adversely affecting, or threatening to 
adversely affect, the installations, ranges, and mili-
tary airspace of the department. 
(c) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall review Chapter 6 of the initial re-
port submitted to Congress under section 2684a(g) of title 
10, United States Code, and report to the congressional 
defense committees on the specific steps, if any, that the 
Secretary plans to take, or recommends that Congress 
take, to address the issues raised in such chapter. 
SEC. 2829. REPORTS ON ARMY AND MARINE CORPS OPER-
ATIONAL RANGES. 
(a) REPORT ON UTILIZATION AND POTENTIAL EX-
PANSION OF ARMY OPERATIONAL RANGES.—Not later 
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report containing an assess-
1374 
ment of the Army operational ranges used to support 
training and range activities of the Army. The report shall 
include the following information: 
(1) The size, description, and mission-essential 
tasks supported by each Army operational range 
during fiscal year 2003. 
(2) A description of the projected changes in 
Army operational range requirements, including the 
size, characteristics, and attributes for mission-es-
sential activities at each Army operational range and 
the extent to which any changes in requirements are 
a result of— 
(A) decisions made as part of the 2005 
round of defense base closure and realignment 
under the Defense Base Closure and Realign-
ment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of 
Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note); 
(B) the conversion of Army brigades to a 
modular format; 
(C) the Integrated Global Presence and 
Basing Strategy; 
(D) the proposal contained in the budget 
justification materials submitted in support of 
the Department of Defense budget for fiscal 
year 2008 to increase the size of the active
1375 
component of the Army to 547,400 personnel 
by the end of fiscal year 2012 and any modi-
fication or acceleration contemplated in the 
budget submission for fiscal year 2009; or 
(E) high operational tempos or surge re-
quirements. 
(3) The projected deficit or surplus of land at 
each Army operational range, and a description of 
the Army’s plan to address that projected deficit or 
surplus of land as well as the upgrade of range at-
tributes at each existing Army operational range. 
(4) A description of the Army’s prioritization 
process and investment strategy to address the po-
tential expansion or upgrade of Army operational 
ranges. 
(5) An analysis of alternatives to the expansion 
of Army operational ranges, including an assessment 
of the joint use of operational ranges under the ju-
risdiction, custody, or control of the Secretary of an-
other military department. 
(6) An analysis of the cost of, potential military 
value of, and potential legal or practical impedi-
ments to, the expansion of the Joint Readiness 
Training Center at Fort Polk, Louisiana, through
1380 
in section 101(e)(3) of such title, except that the 
term is limited to operational ranges under the juris-
diction, custody, or control of the Secretary of the 
Navy that are used by or available for use by the 
Marine Corps. 
(3) The term ‘‘range activities’’ has the mean-
ing given that term in section 101(e)(2) of such 
title. 
SEC. 2830. NIAGARA AIR RESERVE BASE, NEW YORK, BAS-
ING REPORT. 
Not later than March 1, 2008, the Secretary of the 
Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report containing a detailed plan of the current 
and future aviation assets that the Secretary expects will 
be based at Niagara Air Reserve Base, New York. The 
report shall include a description of all of the aviation as-
sets that will be impacted by the series of relocations to 
be made to or from Niagara Air Reserve Base and the 
timeline for such relocations. 
SEC. 2831. REPORT ON THE PINON CANYON MANEUVER 
SITE, COLORADO. 
(a) REPORT ON THE PINON CANYON MANEUVER 
SITE.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
1381 
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the Pinon 
Canyon Maneuver Site (referred to in this section as 
‘‘the Site’’). 
(2) CONTENT.—The report required under 
paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) An analysis of whether existing train-
ing facilities at Fort Carson, Colorado, and the 
Site are sufficient to support the training needs 
of units stationed or planned to be stationed at 
Fort Carson, including the following: 
(i) A description of any new training 
requirements or significant developments 
affecting training requirements for units 
stationed or planned to be stationed at 
Fort Carson since the 2005 Defense Base 
Closure 
and 
Realignment 
Commission 
found that the base has ‘‘sufficient capac-
ity’’ to support four brigade combat teams 
and associated support units at Fort Car-
son. 
(ii) A study of alternatives for enhanc-
ing training facilities at Fort Carson and 
the Site within their current geographic 
footprint, including whether these addi-
1382 
tional investments or measures could sup-
port additional training activities. 
(iii) A description of the current train-
ing calendar and training load at the Site, 
including— 
(I) the number of brigade-sized 
and battalion-sized military exercises 
held at the Site since its establish-
ment; 
(II) an analysis of the maximum 
annual training load at the Site, with-
out expanding the Site; and 
(III) an analysis of the training 
load and projected training calendar 
at the Site when all brigades stationed 
or planned to be stationed at Fort 
Carson are at home station. 
(B) A report of need for any proposed ad-
dition of training land to support units sta-
tioned or planned to be stationed at Fort Car-
son, including the following: 
(i) A description of additional training 
activities, and their benefits to operational 
readiness, which would be conducted by 
units stationed at Fort Carson if, through
1383 
leases or acquisition from consenting land-
owners, the Site were expanded to in-
clude— 
(I) the parcel of land identified 
as ‘‘Area A’’ in the Potential PCMS 
Land expansion map; 
(II) the parcel of land identified 
as ‘‘Area B’’ in the Potential PCMS 
Land expansion map; 
(III) the parcels of land identi-
fied as ‘‘Area A’’ and ‘‘Area B’’ in the 
Potential PCMS Land expansion map; 
(IV) acreage sufficient to allow 
simultaneous exercises of a light in-
fantry brigade and a heavy infantry 
brigade at the Site; 
(V) acreage sufficient to allow si-
multaneous exercises of two heavy in-
fantry brigades at the Site; 
(VI) acreage sufficient to allow 
simultaneous exercises of a light in-
fantry brigade and a battalion at the 
Site; and 
(VII) acreage sufficient to allow 
simultaneous exercises of a heavy in-
1384 
fantry brigade and a battalion at the 
Site. 
(ii) An analysis of alternatives for ac-
quiring or utilizing training land at other 
installations in the United States to sup-
port training activities of units stationed at 
Fort Carson. 
(iii) An analysis of alternatives for 
utilizing other federally owned land to sup-
port training activities of units stationed at 
Fort Carson. 
(C) An analysis of alternatives for enhanc-
ing economic development opportunities in 
southeastern Colorado at the current Site or 
through any proposed expansion, including the 
consideration of the following alternatives: 
(i) The leasing of land on the Site or 
any expansion of the Site to ranchers for 
grazing. 
(ii) The leasing of land from private 
landowners for training. 
(iii) The procurement of additional 
services and goods, including biofuels and 
beef, from local businesses.
1385 
(iv) The creation of an economic de-
velopment fund to benefit communities, 
local governments, and businesses in 
southeastern Colorado. 
(v) The establishment of an outreach 
office to provide technical assistance to 
local businesses that wish to bid on De-
partment of Defense contracts. 
(vi) The establishment of partnerships 
with local governments and organizations 
to expand regional tourism through ex-
panded access to sites of historic, cultural, 
and environmental interest on the Site. 
(vii) An acquisition policy that allows 
willing sellers to minimize the tax impact 
of a sale. 
(viii) Additional investments in Army 
missions and personnel, such as stationing 
an active duty unit at the Site, including— 
(I) an analysis of anticipated 
operational benefits; and 
(II) an analysis of economic im-
pacts to surrounding communities. 
(3) POTENTIAL
PCMS
LAND
EXPANSION
MAP 
DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘Potential
1386 
PCMS Land expansion map’’ means the June 2007 
map entitled ‘‘Potential PCMS Land expansion’’. 
(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF REPORT.— 
Not later than 180 days after the Secretary of Defense 
submits the report required under subsection (a), the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 
Congress a review of the report and of the justification 
of the Army for expansion at the Site. 
(c) PUBLIC COMMENT.—After the report required 
under subsection (b) is submitted to Congress, the Army 
shall solicit public comment on the report for a period of 
not less than 90 days. Not later than 30 days after the 
public comment period has closed, the Secretary shall sub-
mit to Congress a written summary of comments received. 
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances 
SEC. 2841. MODIFICATION OF CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY, 
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON, 
CALIFORNIA. 
Section 2851(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (division B of Public Law 
105–261; 112 Stat. 2219) is amended by striking ‘‘, not-
withstanding any provision of State law to the contrary,’’, 
as added by section 2867 of Public Law 107–107 (115 
Stat. 1334).
1387 
SEC. 2842. GRANT OF EASEMENT, EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, 
FLORIDA. 
(a) GRANT AUTHORIZED.—Secretary of the Air 
Force may use the authority provided by section 2668 of 
title 10, United States Code, to grant to the Mid Bay 
Bridge Authority an easement for a roadway right-of-way 
over such land at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, as the 
Secretary determines necessary to facilitate the construc-
tion of a road connecting the northern landfall of the Mid 
Bay Bridge to Florida State Highway 85. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the grant 
of the easement under subsection (a), the Mid Bay Bridge 
Authority shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to 
the fair-market-value of the easement, as determined by 
the Secretary. 
(c) COSTS OF PROJECT.—As a condition of the grant 
of the easement under subsection (a), the Mid Bay Bridge 
Authority shall be responsible for all costs associated with 
the highway project described in such subsection, includ-
ing all costs the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
address any impacts that the project may have on the de-
fense missions at Eglin Air Force Base. 
SEC. 2843. LAND CONVEYANCE, LYNN HAVEN FUEL DEPOT, 
LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 
the Air Force may convey to Florida State University (in
1388 
this section referred to as the ‘‘University’’) all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of 
real property, including improvements thereon, consisting 
of approximately 40 acres located at the Lynn Haven Fuel 
Depot in Lynn Haven, Florida, as a public benefit convey-
ance for the purpose of permitting the University to de-
velop the property as a new satellite campus. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—For the conveyance of the 
property under subsection (a), the University shall 
provide the United States with consideration in an 
amount that is acceptable to the Secretary, whether 
in the form of cash payment, in-kind consideration, 
or a combination thereof. 
(2) REDUCED TUITION RATES.—The Secretary 
may accept as in-kind consideration under para-
graph (1) reduced tuition rates or scholarships for 
military personnel at the University. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall 
require the University to cover costs to be incurred 
by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for 
costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the 
conveyance under subsection (a), including survey 
costs, appraisal costs, and other costs related to the
1389 
conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Uni-
versity in advance of the Secretary incurring the ac-
tual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the 
costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out 
the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess 
amount to the University. 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reim-
bursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to 
carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall 
be credited to the fund or account that was used to 
cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying 
out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be 
merged with amounts in such fund or account and 
shall be available for the same purposes, and subject 
to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 
in such fund or account. 
(d) USE OF PROPERTY FOR OTHER THAN INTENDED 
PURPOSES.—If the Secretary determines at any time that 
the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not 
being used in accordance with the purposes of the convey-
ance specified in such subsection, the University shall pay 
to the United States an amount equal to the fair market 
value of the property, as of the time of such determination. 
The fair market value of the property, excluding the value
1390 
of any improvements made to the property by the Univer-
sity, shall be determined by the Secretary in accordance 
with Federal appraisal standards and procedures. 
(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 
and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 
under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satis-
factory to the Secretary. 
(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions 
in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as 
the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter-
ests of the United States. 
SEC. 2844. MODIFICATION OF LEASE OF PROPERTY, NA-
TIONAL FLIGHT ACADEMY AT THE NATIONAL 
MUSEUM OF NAVAL AVIATION, NAVAL AIR 
STATION, PENSACOLA, FLORIDA. 
Section 2850(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (division B of the Floyd 
D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 
114 Stat. 1654A–428)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘naval aviation and’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘naval aviation,’’; and 
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ‘‘, and, as of January 1, 2008, to teach
1391 
the science, technology, engineering, and mathe-
matics disciplines that have an impact on and relate 
to aviation’’. 
SEC. 2845. LAND EXCHANGE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis-
trator’’ means the Administrator of General Serv-
ices. 
(2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 
Detroit, Michigan. 
(3) CITY LAND.—The term ‘‘City land’’ means 
the approximately 0.741 acres of real property, in-
cluding any improvement thereon, as depicted on the 
exchange maps, that is commonly identified as 110 
Mount Elliott Street, Detroit, Michigan. 
(4) COMMANDANT.—The term ‘‘Commandant’’ 
means the Commandant of the United States Coast 
Guard. 
(5) EDC.—The term ‘‘EDC’’ means the Eco-
nomic Development Corporation of the City of De-
troit. 
(6) EXCHANGE
MAPS.—The term ‘‘exchange 
maps’’ means the maps entitled ‘‘Atwater Street 
Land Exchange Maps’’ prepared pursuant to sub-
section (f).
1392 
(7) FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘Federal land’’ 
means approximately 1.26 acres of real property, in-
cluding any improvements thereon, as depicted on 
the exchange maps, that is commonly identified as 
2660 Atwater Street, Detroit, Michigan, and under 
the administrative control of the United States 
Coast Guard. 
(8) SECTOR DETROIT.—The term ‘‘Sector De-
troit’’ means Coast Guard Sector Detroit of the 
Ninth Coast Guard District. 
(b) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Commandant 
of the Coast Guard, in coordination with the Adminis-
trator, may convey to the EDC all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to the Federal land. 
(c) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—As consideration for the con-
veyance under subsection (b)— 
(A) the City shall convey to the United 
States all right, title, and interest in and to the 
City land; and 
(B) the EDC shall construct a facility and 
parking lot acceptable to the Commandant of 
the Coast Guard. 
(2) EQUALIZATION PAYMENT OPTION.—
1393 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commandant may, 
upon the agreement of the City and the EDC, 
waive the requirement to construct a facility 
and parking lot under paragraph (1)(B) and ac-
cept in lieu thereof an equalization payment 
from the City equal to the difference between 
the value, as determined by the Administrator 
at the time of transfer, of the Federal land and 
the City land. 
(B) 
AVAILABILITY
OF
FUNDS.—Any 
amounts received pursuant to subparagraph (A) 
shall be available to the Commandant, without 
further appropriation and until expended, to 
construct, expand, or improve facilities related 
to Sector Detroit’s aids to navigation or vessel 
maintenance. 
(d) CONDITIONS OF EXCHANGE.— 
(1) COVENANTS.—All conditions placed within 
the deeds of title shall be construed as covenants 
running with the land. 
(2) 
AUTHORITY
TO
ACCEPT
QUITCLAIM 
DEED.—The Commandant may accept a quitclaim 
deed for the City land and may convey the Federal 
land by quitclaim deed.
1394 
(3) ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION.—Prior to 
the time of the exchange, the Coast Guard and the 
EDC shall remediate any and all contaminants exist-
ing on their respective properties to levels required 
by applicable State and Federal law. The Com-
mandant and, as a condition of the exchange, the 
EDC shall make available for review and inspection 
any record relating to hazardous materials on the 
land to be exchanged under this section. The costs 
of remedial actions relating to hazardous materials 
on exchanged land shall be paid by those entities re-
sponsible for costs under applicable law. 
(e) AUTHORITY
TO
ENTER
INTO
LICENSE
OR 
LEASE.—The Commandant may enter into a license or 
lease agreement with the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy 
for the use of a portion of the Federal land for the Detroit 
Riverfront Walk. Such license or lease shall be at no cost 
to the City and upon such other terms that are acceptable 
to the Commandant, and shall terminate upon the comple-
tion of the exchange authorized by this section, or the date 
specified in subsection (h), whichever occurs earlier. 
(f) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Commandant 
shall file with the Committee on Commerce, Science
1395 
and Transportation of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House 
of 
Representatives 
the 
maps, 
entitled 
‘‘Atwater Street Land Exchange Maps’’, which de-
pict the Federal land and the City lands and provide 
a legal description of each property to be exchanged. 
(2) FORCE OF LAW.—The maps and legal de-
scriptions filed under paragraph (1) shall have the 
same force and effect as if included in this Act, ex-
cept that the Commandant may correct typo-
graphical errors in the maps and each legal descrip-
tion. 
(3) PUBLIC
AVAILABILITY.—Each map and 
legal description filed under paragraph (1) shall be 
on file and available for public inspection in the ap-
propriate offices of the Coast Guard and the City. 
(g) ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.—The 
Commandant may require such additional terms and con-
ditions in connection with the exchange under this section 
as the Commandant considers appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(h) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—The 
authority to enter into the exchange authorized by this 
section shall expire three years after the date of enactment 
of this Act.
1396 
SEC. 2846. TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION, FORMER NIKE 
MISSILE SITE, GROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN. 
(a) TRANSFER.—Administrative jurisdiction over the 
property described in subsection (b) is hereby transferred 
from the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency to the Secretary of the Interior. 
(b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred 
to in subsection (a) is the former Nike missile site located 
at the southern end of Grosse Ile, Michigan, as depicted 
on the map entitled ‘‘07–CE’’ on file with the Environ-
mental Protection Agency and dated May 16, 1984. 
(c) ADMINISTRATION
OF PROPERTY.—Subject to 
subsection (d), the Secretary of the Interior shall admin-
ister the property described in subsection (b)— 
(1) acting through the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service; 
(2) as part of the Detroit River International 
Wildlife Refuge; and 
(3) for use as a habitat for fish and wildlife and 
as a recreational property for outdoor education and 
environmental appreciation. 
(d) MANAGEMENT
OF
REMEDIATION.—The Sec-
retary of Defense, acting through the Army Corps of En-
gineers, shall manage and carry out environmental remedi-
ation activities with respect to the property described in 
subsection (b) that, at a minimum, achieve the standard
1397 
sufficient to allow the property to be used as provided in 
subsection (c)(3). Such remediation activities, with the ex-
ception of long-term monitoring, shall be completed to 
achieve that standard not later than two years after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of De-
fense may use amounts made available from the account 
established by section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United 
States Code, to carry out such remediation. 
(e) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, or 
any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, in-
cluding the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 
et seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 
et seq.). 
SEC. 2847. MODIFICATION TO LAND CONVEYANCE AUTHOR-
ITY, FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA. 
(a) REQUIREMENT TO CONVEY TRACT NO. 404–1 
PROPERTY WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.—Section 2836 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1998 (division B of Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 
2005) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘at fair 
market value’’ and inserting ‘‘without consider-
ation’’;
1398 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) 
and inserting the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) The conveyances under paragraphs (2) and (3) 
of subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that the 
County develop and use the conveyed properties for edu-
cational purposes and the construction of public school 
structures.’’; and 
(3) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (2) 
and inserting the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) If the Secretary determines at any time that the 
real property conveyed under paragraph (2) or paragraph 
(3) of subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with 
subsection (b)(2), all right, title, and interest in and to 
the property conveyed under such paragraph, including 
any improvements thereon, shall revert, at the option of 
the Secretary, to the United States, and the United States 
shall have the right of immediate entry thereon.’’. 
(b) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—Such 
section is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subsection: 
‘‘(f) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE OF TRACT 
NO. 404–1 PROPERTY.— 
‘‘(1) 
PAYMENT
REQUIRED.—The 
Secretary 
shall require the County to cover costs to be in-
curred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Sec-
1399 
retary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry 
out the conveyance under subsection (a)(3), includ-
ing survey costs, costs related to environmental doc-
umentation, and other administrative costs related 
to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the 
County in advance of the Secretary incurring the ac-
tual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the 
costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out 
the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess 
amount to the County. 
‘‘(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received as reimbursement under para-
graph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account 
that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Sec-
retary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund 
or account, and shall be available for the same pur-
poses, and subject to the same conditions and limita-
tions, as amounts in such fund or account.’’. 
SEC. 2848. LAND CONVEYANCE, LEWIS AND CLARK UNITED 
STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTER, BISMARCK, 
NORTH DAKOTA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 
the Army may convey, without consideration, to the 
United Tribes Technical College all right, title, and inter-
1400 
est of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, 
including improvements thereon, consisting of approxi-
mately 2 acres located at the Lewis and Clark United 
States Army Reserve Center, 3319 University Drive, Bis-
marck, North Dakota, for the purpose of supporting edu-
cation at the United Tribes Technical College. 
(b) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), if 
the Secretary determines at any time that the real 
property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being 
used in accordance with the purposes of the convey-
ance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and 
interest in and to the property shall revert, at the 
option of the Secretary, to the United States, and 
the United States shall have the right of immediate 
entry onto the property. Any determination of the 
Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the 
record after an opportunity for a hearing. 
(2) EXPIRATION.—The reversionary interest 
under paragraph (1) shall expire upon satisfaction of 
the following conditions: 
(A) The real property conveyed under sub-
section (a) is used in accordance with the pur-
poses of the conveyance specified in such sub-
1401 
section for a period of not less than 30 years 
following the date of the conveyance. 
(B) After the end of period specified in 
subparagraph (A), the United Tribes Technical 
College applies to the Secretary for the release 
of the reversionary interest. 
(C) The Secretary certifies, in a manner 
that can be filed with the appropriate land rec-
ordation office, that the condition under sub-
paragraph (A) has been satisfied. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall 
require the United Tribes Technical College to cover 
costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reim-
burse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Sec-
retary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection 
(a), including survey costs, costs related to environ-
mental documentation, and other administrative 
costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are col-
lected from the United Tribes Technical College in 
advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, 
and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually 
incurred by the Secretary to carry out the convey-
ance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount 
to the United Tribes Technical College.
1402 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received as reimbursements under para-
graph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account 
that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Sec-
retary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund 
or account and shall be available for the same pur-
poses, and subject to the same conditions and limita-
tions, as amounts in such fund or account. 
(d) DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY.—The exact 
acreage and legal description of the real property to be 
conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a 
survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 
(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.—The 
Secretary may require such additional terms and condi-
tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection 
(a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
SEC. 2849. LAND EXCHANGE, FORT HOOD, TEXAS. 
(a) EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the 
Army may convey to the City of Copperas Cove, Texas 
(in this section referred to as the ‘‘City’’), all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of 
real property, including any improvements thereon, con-
sisting of approximately 200 acres at Fort Hood, Texas,
1403 
for the purpose of permitting the City to improve arterial 
transportation routes in the community. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the con-
veyance under subsection (a), the City shall convey to the 
Secretary all right, title, and interest of the City in and 
to one or more parcels of real property that are acceptable 
to the Secretary. The fair market value of the real prop-
erty acquired by the Secretary under this subsection shall 
be at least equal to the fair market value of the real prop-
erty conveyed under subsection (a), as determined by ap-
praisals acceptable to the Secretary. 
(c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 
and legal description of the real property to be exchanged 
under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfac-
tory to the Secretary. 
(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall 
require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the 
Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs in-
curred by the Secretary, to carry out the convey-
ances under this section, including survey costs re-
lated to the conveyances. If amounts are collected 
from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring 
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds 
the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry
1404 
out the conveyances, the Secretary shall refund the 
excess amount to the City. 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reim-
bursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to 
carry out the conveyances under this section shall be 
credited to the fund or account that was used to 
cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying 
out the conveyances. Amounts so credited shall be 
merged with amounts in such fund or account and 
shall be available for the same purposes, and subject 
to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 
in such fund or account. 
(e) ADDITIONAL TERM AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec-
retary may require such additional terms and conditions 
in connection with the conveyances under this section as 
the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter-
ests of the United States. 
Subtitle D—Energy Security 
SEC. 2861. REPEAL OF CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION RE-
QUIREMENT 
REGARDING 
CANCELLATION 
CEILING FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EN-
ERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS. 
Section 2913 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (e).
1405 
SEC. 2862. DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVE FUELED VEHICLE. 
Section 301(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 
U.S.C. 13211(3)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(3) the term’’ and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(3) ALTERNATIVE FUELED VEHICLE.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(B) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘alternative 
fueled vehicle’ includes— 
‘‘(i) a new qualified fuel cell motor ve-
hicle (as defined in section 30B(b)(3) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); 
‘‘(ii) a new advanced lean burn tech-
nology motor vehicle (as defined in section 
30B(c)(3) of that Code); 
‘‘(iii) a new qualified hybrid motor ve-
hicle (as defined in section 30B(d)(3) of 
that Code); and 
‘‘(iv) any other type of vehicle that 
the Administrator demonstrates to the Sec-
retary would achieve a significant reduc-
tion in petroleum consumption.’’.
1406 
SEC. 2863. USE OF ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING FIXTURES 
AND BULBS IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
FACILITIES. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION
AND ALTERATION
OF BUILD-
INGS.—Each building constructed or significantly altered 
by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military 
department shall be equipped, to the maximum extent fea-
sible as determined by the Secretary concerned, with light-
ing fixtures and bulbs that are energy efficient. 
(b) MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS.—Each lighting 
fixture or bulb that is replaced in the normal course of 
maintenance of buildings under the jurisdiction of the Sec-
retary of Defense or the Secretary of a military depart-
ment shall be replaced, to the maximum extent feasible 
as determined by the Secretary concerned, with a lighting 
fixture or bulb that is energy efficient. 
(c) CONSIDERATIONS.—In making a determination 
under this section concerning the feasibility of installing 
a lighting fixture or bulb that is energy efficient, the Sec-
retary of Defense or the Secretary of a military depart-
ment shall consider— 
(1) the life cycle cost effectiveness of the fixture 
or bulb; 
(2) the compatibility of the fixture or bulb with 
existing equipment;
1407 
(3) whether use of the fixture or bulb could re-
sult in interference with productivity; 
(4) the aesthetics relating to use of the fixture 
or bulb; and 
(5) such other factors as the Secretary con-
cerned determines appropriate. 
(d) ENERGY STAR.—A lighting fixture or bulb shall 
be treated as being energy efficient for purposes of this 
section if— 
(1) the fixture or bulb is certified under the En-
ergy Star program established by section 324A of 
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6294a); or 
(2) the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of 
a military department has otherwise determined that 
the fixture or bulb is energy efficient. 
(e) SIGNIFICANT ALTERATIONS.—A building shall be 
treated as being significantly altered for purposes of sub-
section (a) if the alteration is subject to congressional au-
thorization under section 2802 of title 10, United States 
Code. 
(f) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense 
may waive the requirements of this section if the Secretary 
determines that such a waiver is necessary to protect the 
national security interests of the United States.
1408 
(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The requirements of sub-
sections (a) and (b) shall take effect one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 2864. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO RE-
NEWABLE ENERGY USE BY DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE 
TO 
MEET 
DEPARTMENT 
ELEC-
TRICITY NEEDS. 
(a) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
containing the following information: 
(1) The extent to which energy from renewable 
energy sources is used to meet the electricity needs 
of the Department of Defense, to be stated as a per-
centage of total facility electricity use for the pre-
vious fiscal year. 
(2) The extent to which energy from renewable 
energy sources was procured through alternative fi-
nancing methods, to be stated as a percentage of 
total renewable energy procurement and as a dollar 
amount for the previous fiscal year. 
(3) The extent to which energy from renewable 
energy sources was procured through the use of ap-
propriated funds, to be stated as a percentage of
1409 
total renewable energy procurement and as a dollar 
amount for the previous fiscal year. 
(4) A graphical illustration of energy use from 
renewable energy sources by the Department as a 
percentage of total facility electricity use over time, 
starting no later than fiscal year 2000 and running 
through fiscal year 2025, including projected future 
trends in renewable energy consumption through fis-
cal year 2025 in order to meet the goals for renew-
able energy set forth in section 2911(e) of title 10, 
United States Code, or other goals, as appropriate. 
(b) SUBSEQUENT REPORTS.—For fiscal year 2008 
and each fiscal year thereafter, the information required 
by paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) shall be 
included in the Annual Energy Management Report pre-
pared by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics. 
(c) RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘renewable energy sources’’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 203(b) of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15852(b)).
1410 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 2871. REVISED DEADLINE FOR TRANSFER OF ARLING-
TON 
NAVAL 
ANNEX 
TO 
ARLINGTON 
NA-
TIONAL CEMETERY. 
Subsection (h) of section 2881 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division 
B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 879), as amended by 
section 2863 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107– 
107; 115 Stat. 1330), section 2851 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division 
B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2726), and section 
2881 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 115 
Stat. 2153), is further amended by striking paragraphs 
(1) and (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(1) January 1, 2011; 
‘‘(2) the date on which the Navy Annex prop-
erty is no longer required (as determined by the Sec-
retary of Defense) for use as temporary office space; 
or 
‘‘(3) one year after the date on which the Sec-
retary of the Army notifies the Secretary of Defense 
that the Navy Annex property is needed for the ex-
pansion of Arlington National Cemetery.’’.
1411 
SEC. 2872. TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION OVER AIR FORCE 
MEMORIAL TO DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR 
FORCE. 
(a) TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION.—Notwithstanding 
section 2881 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 
65; 113 Stat. 879) and section 2863 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division 
B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1330; 40 U.S.C. 
1003 note), the Secretary of the Army may transfer ad-
ministrative jurisdiction, custody, and control of the parcel 
of Federal land described in subsection (b)(1) of such sec-
tion 2863 to the Secretary of the Air Force. 
(b) LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—If the 
Air Force Memorial is transferred to the Secretary of the 
Air Force as authorized by subsection (a), the United 
States shall not pay any costs incurred for the mainte-
nance and repair of the Air Force Memorial. 
SEC. 2873. REPORT ON PLANS TO REPLACE THE MONU-
MENT AT THE TOMB OF THE UNKNOWNS AT 
ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY, VIRGINIA. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of the Army and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
jointly submit to Congress a report setting forth the fol-
lowing:
1412 
(1) The current plans of the Secretaries with 
respect to— 
(A) replacing the monument at the Tomb 
of the Unknowns at Arlington National Ceme-
tery, Virginia; and 
(B) disposing of the current monument at 
the Tomb of the Unknowns, if it were removed 
and replaced. 
(2) An assessment of the feasibility and advis-
ability of repairing the monument at the Tomb of 
the Unknowns rather than replacing it. 
(3) A description of the current efforts of the 
Secretaries to maintain and preserve the monument 
at the Tomb of the Unknowns. 
(4) An explanation of why no attempt has been 
made since 1989 to repair the monument at the 
Tomb of the Unknowns. 
(5) A comprehensive estimate of the cost of re-
placement of the monument at the Tomb of the Un-
knowns and the cost of repairing such monument. 
(6) An assessment of the structural integrity of 
the monument at the Tomb of the Unknowns. 
(b) LIMITATION ON ACTION.—The Secretary of the 
Army and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not take 
any action to replace the monument at the Tomb of the
1413 
Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, until 
180 days after the date of the receipt by Congress of the 
report required by subsection (a). 
(c) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (b) 
shall not prevent the Secretary of the Army or the Sec-
retary of Veterans Affairs from repairing the current 
monument at the Tomb of the Unknowns or from acquir-
ing any blocks of marble for uses related to such monu-
ment, subject to the availability of appropriations for those 
purposes. 
SEC. 2874. INCREASED AUTHORITY FOR REPAIR, RESTORA-
TION, AND PRESERVATION OF LAFAYETTE 
ESCADRILLE 
MEMORIAL, 
MARNES-LA-CO-
QUETTE, FRANCE. 
Section 1065 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 
1233) is amended— 
(1) 
in 
subsection 
(a)(2), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$2,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$2,500,000’’; and 
(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘under section 
301(a)(4)’’. 
SEC. 2875. ADDITION OF WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTEC-
TION PROJECT. 
Section 2866 of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law
1414 
109–364; 120 Stat. 2499) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT.— 
‘‘(1) ASSUMPTION
OF
RESPONSIBILITY.—The 
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers, shall assume responsibility for the annual 
operation and maintenance of the Woonsocket local 
protection project authorized by section 10 of the 
Act of December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the 
Flood Control Act of 1944; 58 Stat. 892, chapter 
665), including by acquiring, in accordance with 
paragraph (2), any interest of the city of 
Woonsocket, Rhode Island, in and to land and struc-
tures required for the continued operation and main-
tenance, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and 
structural integrity of the project, as identified by 
the city, in coordination with the Secretary. 
‘‘(2) ACQUISITION.—As a condition on the Sec-
retary’s 
assumption 
of 
responsibility 
for 
the 
Woonsocket local protection project under paragraph 
(1), the city of Woonsocket shall convey, not later 
than one year after the date of the enactment of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008, to the Secretary of the Army, by quitclaim 
deed and without consideration, all right, title, and
1415 
interest of the city in and to the Woonsocket local 
protection project, including any interest of the city 
in and to land and structures required for the con-
tinued operation and maintenance, repair, replace-
ment, rehabilitation, and structural integrity of the 
project, as identified by the city.’’. 
SEC. 2876. REPEAL OF MORATORIUM ON IMPROVEMENTS 
AT FORT BUCHANAN, PUERTO RICO. 
Section 1507 of the Floyd D. Spence National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted 
into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–355) 
is repealed. 
SEC. 2877. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MILITARY WORK-
ING DOG TEAMS MONUMENT ON SUITABLE 
MILITARY INSTALLATION. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MONUMENT.—The 
Secretary of Defense may permit the National War Dogs 
Monument, Inc., to establish and maintain, at a suitable 
location at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, or another military in-
stallation in the United States, a national monument to 
honor the sacrifice and service of United States Armed 
Forces working dog teams that have participated in the 
military operations of the United States. 
(b) LOCATION AND DESIGN OF MONUMENT.—The 
actual location and final design of the monument author-
1416 
ized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval of 
the Secretary. In selecting the military installation and 
site on such installation to serve as the location for the 
monument, the Secretary shall seek to maximize access 
to the resulting monument for both visitors and their dogs. 
(c) MAINTENANCE.—The maintenance of the monu-
ment authorized by subsection (a) by the National War 
Dogs Monument, Inc., shall be subject to such conditions 
regarding access to the monument, and such other condi-
tions, as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States. 
(d) LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—The 
United States Government shall not pay any expense for 
the establishment or maintenance of the monument au-
thorized by subsection (a). 
SEC. 2878. REPORT REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF MIS-
SILES FROM 564TH MISSILE SQUADRON. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on the feasibility of establishing an association be-
tween the 120th Fighter Wing of the Montana Air Na-
tional Guard and active duty personnel stationed at 
Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. In preparing the 
report, the Secretary shall include the following evalua-
tions:
1417 
(1) An evaluation of the requirement of the Air 
Force for additional F–15 aircraft active or reserve 
component force structure. 
(2) An evaluation of the airspace training op-
portunities in the immediate airspace around Great 
Falls International Airport Air Guard Station. 
(3) An evaluation of the impact of civilian oper-
ations on military operations at Great Falls Inter-
national Airport. 
(4) An evaluation of the level of civilian en-
croachment on the facilities and airspace of the 
120th Fighter Wing. 
(5) An evaluation of the support structure 
available, including active military bases nearby. 
(6) An evaluation of opportunities for additional 
association between the Montana National Guard 
and the 341st Space Wing. 
(b) LIMITATION ON REMOVAL PENDING REPORT.— 
Not more than 40 missiles may be removed from the 
564th Missile Squadron until 15 days after the report re-
quired in subsection (a) has been submitted.
1418 
SEC. 2879. REPORT ON CONDITION OF SCHOOLS UNDER JU-
RISDICTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
EDUCATION ACTIVITY. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 
2008, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the con-
gressional defense committees a report on the conditions 
of schools under the jurisdiction of the Department of De-
fense Education Activity. 
(b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 
(a) shall include the following: 
(1) A description of each school under the con-
trol of the Secretary, including the location, year 
constructed, grades of attending children, maximum 
capacity, and current capacity of the school. 
(2) A description of the standards and proc-
esses used by the Secretary to assess the adequacy 
of the size of school facilities, the ability of facilities 
to support school programs, and the current condi-
tion of facilities. 
(3) A description of the conditions of the facil-
ity or facilities at each school, including the level of 
compliance with the standards described in para-
graph (2), any existing or projected facility defi-
ciencies or inadequate conditions at each facility, 
and whether any of the facilities listed are tem-
porary structures.
1419 
(4) An investment strategy planned for each 
school to correct deficiencies identified in paragraph 
(3), including a description of each project to correct 
such deficiencies, cost estimates, and timelines to 
complete each project. 
(5) A description of requirements for new 
schools to be constructed over the next 10 years as 
a result of changes to the population of military per-
sonnel. 
(c) USE OF REPORT AS MASTER PLAN FOR REPAIR, 
UPGRADE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF SCHOOLS.—The Sec-
retary shall use the report required under subsection (a) 
as a master plan for the repair, upgrade, and construction 
of schools in the Department of Defense system that sup-
port dependents of members of the Armed Forces and ci-
vilian employees of the Department of Defense. 
SEC. 2880. REPORT ON FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS OF 
DARNALL ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT 
HOOD MILITARY RESERVATION, TEXAS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port assessing the facilities and operations of the Darnall 
Army Medical Center at Fort Hood Military Reservation, 
Texas.
1420 
(b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 
(a) shall include the following: 
(1) A specific determination of whether the fa-
cilities currently housing Darnall Army Medical Cen-
ter meet Department of Defense standards for Army 
medical centers. 
(2) A specific determination of whether the ex-
isting facilities adequately support the operations of 
Darnall Army Medical Center, including the mis-
sions of medical treatment, medical hold, medical 
holdover, and Warriors in Transition. 
(3) A specific determination of whether the ex-
isting facilities provide adequate physical space for 
the number of personnel that would be required for 
Darnall Army Medical Center to function as a full- 
sized Army medical center. 
(4) A specific determination of whether the cur-
rent levels of medical and medical-related personnel 
at Darnall Army Medical Center are adequate to 
support the operations of a full-sized Army medical 
center. 
(5) A specific determination of whether the cur-
rent levels of graduate medical education and med-
ical residency programs currently in place at Darnall
1421 
Army Medical Center are adequate to support the 
operations of a full-sized Army medical center. 
(6) A description of any and all deficiencies 
identified by the Secretary. 
(7) A proposed investment plan and timeline to 
correct such deficiencies. 
SEC. 2881. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A 
REGIONAL DISASTER RESPONSE CENTER AT 
KELLY AIR FIELD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings: 
(1) The Federal response to Hurricane Katrina 
demonstrated the need for greater coordination and 
planning capability at the Federal, State, and local 
levels of government. 
(2) Coordination of State and local assets can 
be more effectively accomplished if such assets are 
organized on a regional basis similar to the manner 
in which the Federal Emergency Management Agen-
cy organizes its efforts. 
(3) Despite the obvious need for experienced 
and routinely exercised operational headquarters 
skilled in disaster response, no such headquarters 
have been established.
1422 
(4) Such a headquarters would be appropriately 
located on available Federal property in Region VI 
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
which includes Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkan-
sas, and New Mexico, and is a region subject to for-
est fires, floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 31, 
2008, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 
Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to Congress 
a report on the feasibility of establishing at Kelly Air Field 
in San Antonio, Texas, a permanent, regionally oriented 
disaster response center responsible for planning, coordi-
nating, and directing the Federal, State, and local re-
sponse to man-made and natural disasters that occur in 
Region VI of the Federal Emergency Management Agen-
cy. 
(c) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 
(b) shall include the following: 
(1) A determination of how the regional dis-
aster response center, if established at Kelly Air 
Field, would organize and leverage capabilities of the 
following currently co-located organizations, facili-
ties, and forces located in San Antonio, Texas: 
(A) Lackland Air Force Base. 
(B) Fort Sam Houston.
1423 
(C) Brooke Army Medical Center. 
(D) Wilford Hall Medical Center. 
(E) City of San Antonio/Bexar County 
Emergency Operations Center. 
(F) Audie Murphy Veterans Administra-
tion Medical Center. 
(G) 433rd Airlift Wing C–5 Heavy Lift 
Aircraft. 
(H) 149 Fighter Wing and Texas Air Na-
tional Guard F–16 fighter aircraft. 
(I) Army Northern Command. 
(J) The three level 1 trauma centers of the 
National Trauma Institute. 
(K) Texas Medical Rangers. 
(L) San Antonio Metro Health Depart-
ment. 
(M) The University of Texas Health 
Science Center at San Antonio. 
(N) The Air Intelligence Surveillance and 
Reconnaissance Agency at Lackland Air Force 
Base. 
(O) The United States Air Force Security 
Police Training Department at Lackland Air 
Force Base.
1424 
(P) The large manpower pools and blood 
donor pools from the more than 6,000 trainees 
at Lackland Air Force Base. 
(2) A determination of the number of military 
and civilian personnel who would have to be mobi-
lized to run the logistics, planning, and maintenance 
of the regional disaster response center, if estab-
lished at Kelly Air Field, during a time of disaster 
recovery. 
(3) A determination of the number of military 
and civilian personnel who would be required to run 
the logistics, planning, and maintenance of the re-
gional disaster response center during a time when 
no disaster is occurring. 
(4) A determination of the cost of improving 
the current infrastructure at Kelly Air Field to meet 
the needs of displaced victims of a disaster equiva-
lent to that of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita or a 
natural or man-made disaster of similar scope, in-
cluding adequate beds, food stores, and decon-
tamination stations to triage radiation or other 
chemical or biological agent contamination victims. 
(5) An evaluation of the current capability of 
the Department of Defense and the Department of 
Homeland Security to respond to these mission re-
1425 
quirements and an assessment of any additional ca-
pabilities that are required. 
(6) An assessment of the costs and benefits of 
adding such capabilities at Kelly Air Field to the 
costs and benefits of other locations. 
SEC. 2882. NAMING OF HOUSING FACILITY AT FORT CAR-
SON, COLORADO, IN HONOR OF THE HONOR-
ABLE JOEL HEFLEY, A FORMER MEMBER OF 
THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENT-
ATIVES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings: 
(1) Representative Joel Hefley was elected to 
represent Colorado’s 5th Congressional district in 
1986 and served in the House of Representatives 
until the end of the 109th Congress in 2007 with 
distinction, class, integrity, and honor. 
(2) Representative Hefley served on the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Rep-
resentatives for 18 years, including service as Chair-
man of the Subcommittee on Military Installations 
and Facilities from 1995 through 2000 and, from 
2001 until 2007, as Chairman of the Subcommittee 
on Readiness.
1426 
(3) Representative Hefley was a fair and effec-
tive lawmaker who worked for the national interest 
while never forgetting his Western roots. 
(4) Representative Hefley’s efforts on the Com-
mittee on Armed Services were instrumental to the 
military value of, and quality of life at, installations 
in the State of Colorado, including Fort Carson, 
Cheyenne Mountain, Peterson Air Force Base, 
Schriever Air Force Base, Buckley Air Force Base, 
and the United States Air Force Academy. 
(5) Representative Hefley was a leader in ef-
forts to retain and expand Fort Carson as an essen-
tial part of the national defense system during the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment process. 
(6) Representative Hefley consistently advo-
cated for providing members of the Armed Forces 
and their families with quality, safe, and affordable 
housing and supportive communities. 
(7) Representative Hefley spearheaded the Mili-
tary Housing Privatization Initiative to eliminate in-
adequate housing on military installations, with the 
first pilot program located at Fort Carson. 
(8) Representative Hefley’s leadership on the 
Military Housing Privatization Initiative allowed for 
the privatization of more than 121,000 units of mili-
1427 
tary family housing, which brought meaningful im-
provements to living conditions for thousands of 
members of the Armed Forces and their spouses and 
children at installations throughout the United 
States. 
(9) It is fitting and proper that an appropriate 
military family housing area or structure at Fort 
Carson be designated in honor of Representative 
Hefley. 
(b) DESIGNATION.—Notwithstanding Army Regula-
tion AR 1–33, the Secretary of the Army shall designate 
one of the military family housing areas or facilities con-
structed for Fort Carson, Colorado, using the authority 
provided by subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, 
United States Code, as the ‘‘Joel Hefley Village’’. 
SEC. 2883. NAMING OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
CENTER AT ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS, IN 
HONOR OF THE HONORABLE LANE EVANS, A 
FORMER MEMBER OF THE UNITED STATES 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings: 
(1) Representative Lane Evans was elected to 
the House of Representatives in 1982 and served in 
the House of Representatives until the end of the
1428 
109th Congress in 2007 representing the people of 
Illinois’ 17th Congressional district. 
(2) As a member of the Committee on Armed 
Services of the House of Representatives, Represent-
ative Evans worked to bring common sense priorities 
to defense spending and strengthen the military’s 
conventional readiness. 
(3) Representative Evans was a tireless advo-
cate for military veterans, ensuring that veterans re-
ceive the medical care they need and advocating for 
individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress dis-
order and Gulf War Syndrome. 
(4) Representative Evans’ efforts to improve 
the transition of individuals from military service to 
the care of the Department of Veterans Affairs will 
continue to benefit generations of veterans long into 
the future. 
(5) Representative Evans was credited with 
bringing new services to veterans living in his Con-
gressional district, including outpatient clinics in the 
Quad Cities and Quincy and the Quad-Cities Vet 
Center. 
(6) Representative Evans worked with local 
leaders to promote the Rock Island Arsenal, and it 
earned new jobs and missions through his support.
1430 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Sherwood Boeh-
lert Center of Excellence for Information Science and 
Technology. 
SEC. 2885. NAMING OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AT 
JOINT SYSTEMS MANUFACTURING CENTER, 
LIMA, OHIO, IN HONOR OF THE HONORABLE 
MICHAEL G. OXLEY, A FORMER MEMBER OF 
THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENT-
ATIVES. 
The administration building under construction at 
the Joint Systems Manufacturing Center in Lima, Ohio, 
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Michael G. Oxley 
Administration and Technology Center’’. Any reference in 
a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record 
of the United States to such building shall be deemed to 
be a reference to the Michael G. Oxley Administration and 
Technology Center. 
SEC. 2886. NAMING OF LOGISTICS AUTOMATION TRAINING 
FACILITY, ARMY QUARTERMASTER CENTER 
AND 
SCHOOL, 
FORT 
LEE, 
VIRGINIA, 
IN 
HONOR OF GENERAL RICHARD H. THOMP-
SON. 
Notwithstanding Army Regulation AR 1–33, the Lo-
gistics Automation Training Facility of the Army Quarter-
master Center and School at Fort Lee, Virginia, shall be
1431 
known and designated as the ‘‘General Richard H. 
Thompson Logistics Automation Training Facility’’ in 
honor of General Richard H. Thompson, the only quarter-
master to have risen from private to full general. Any ref-
erence in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to such facility shall be 
deemed to be a reference to the General Richard H. 
Thompson Logistics Automation Training Facility. 
SEC. 2887. AUTHORITY TO RELOCATE JOINT SPECTRUM 
CENTER TO FORT MEADE, MARYLAND. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT RELOCATION AGREE-
MENT.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out an 
agreement to relocate the Joint Spectrum Center, a geo-
graphically separated unit of the Defense Information 
Systems Agency, from Annapolis, Maryland, to Fort 
Meade, Maryland, or another military installation if— 
(1) the Secretary determines that the relocation 
of the Joint Spectrum Center is in the best interest 
of national security and the physical protection of 
personnel and missions of the Department of De-
fense; and 
(2) the agreement between the lease holder and 
the Department of Defense provides equitable and 
appropriate terms to facilitate the relocation.
1432 
(b) AUTHORIZATION.—Any facility, road, or infra-
structure constructed or altered on a military installation 
as a result of the agreement referred to in subsection (a) 
is deemed to be authorized in accordance with section 
2802 of title 10, United States Code. 
(c) TERMINATION OF EXISTING LEASE.—Upon com-
pletion of the relocation of the Joint Spectrum Center, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
the existing lease for the Joint Spectrum Center shall be 
terminated, as contemplated under Condition 29.B of the 
lease. 
TITLE XXIX—WAR-RELATED AND 
EMERGENCY MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2902. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2903. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2904. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2905. Authorized base closure and realignment activities funded through 
Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 and re-
lated authorization of appropriations. 
SEC. 2901. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (c)(1), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction
1433 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Colorado ............................
Fort Carson ...........................................
$8,100,000 
Georgia .............................
Fort Stewart .........................................
$6,000,000 
Kansas ..............................
Fort Riley ..............................................
$50,000,000 
Kentucky ..........................
Fort Campbell .......................................
$7,400,000 
Louisiana ..........................
Fort Polk ...............................................
$4,900,000 
New York ..........................
Fort Drum ............................................
$38,000,000 
Texas ................................
Fort Hood .............................................
$9,100,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (c)(2), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan ......................
Bagram Air Base ..................................
$249,600,000 
......................................
Ghazni ...................................................
$5,000,000 
......................................
Kabul .....................................................
$36,000,000 
Iraq ...................................
Camp Adder ..........................................
$80,650,000 
......................................
Al Asad ..................................................
$92,600,000 
...........................................
Camp Anaconda ....................................
$53,500,000 
...........................................
Camp Constitution ................................
$11,700,000 
......................................
Camp Cropper .......................................
$9,500,000 
......................................
Fallujah .................................................
$880,000 
......................................
Camp Marez ..........................................
$880,000 
......................................
Mosul .....................................................
$43,000,000 
...........................................
Q-West ..................................................
$26,000,000 
......................................
Camp Ramadi .......................................
$880,000 
......................................
Scania ....................................................
$14,200,000 
......................................
Camp Speicher ......................................
$83,900,000 
......................................
Camp Taqqadum ...................................
$880,000 
......................................
Tikrit .....................................................
$43,000,000 
......................................
Camp Victory ........................................
$65,400,000 
......................................
Camp Warrior .......................................
$880,000 
......................................
Various Locations .................................
$207,000,000 
Kuwait ..............................
Camp Arifjan ........................................
$30,000,000
1434 
(c) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2007, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total 
amount of $1,257,750,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
subsection 
(a), 
$123,500,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by subsection (b), 
$1,055,450,000. 
(3) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $78,800,000. 
(d) REPORT REQUIRED BEFORE COMMENCING CER-
TAIN PROJECTS.—Funds may not be obligated for the 
projects authorized by subsection (b) for Camp Arifjan, 
Kuwait, or Camp Cropper, Iraq, until 14 days after the 
date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the 
congressional defense committees a report, in either un-
classified or classified form, containing a detailed justifica-
tion for the project, including the overall intent of the re-
quested construction, host-nation views, longevity of the
1435 
site selected, and timelines for completion. The Secretary 
shall submit the report not later than January 15, 2008. 
SEC. 2902. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (d)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
California ............
Camp Pendleton ..............................................
$102,034,000 
........................
Twentynine Palms ..........................................
$4,440,000 
North Carolina ....
Camp Lejeune .................................................
$43,340,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (d)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Djibouti ...............
Camp Lemonier ..............................................
$25,410,000
1438 
(2) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $35,000,000. 
SEC. 2904. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (c)(1), the Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Texas ..................
Fort Sam Houston ..........................................
$21,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in subsection (c)(2), the Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Qatar ...................
Al Udeid ..........................................................
$6,600,000
1439 
(c) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2007, for military con-
struction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the 
military departments) in the total amount of $27,600,000 
as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
subsection 
(a), 
$21,000,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside 
the United States authorized by subsection (a), 
$6,600,000. 
SEC. 2905. AUTHORIZED BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGN-
MENT ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AC-
COUNT 2005 AND RELATED AUTHORIZATION 
OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
(a) AUTHORIZED BASE CLOSURE
AND REALIGN-
MENT ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE
BASE
CLOSURE
ACCOUNT
2005.—Using 
amounts authorized appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in subsection (b), the Secretary 
of Defense may carry out base closure and realignment 
activities otherwise authorized by section 2702 of this Act,
1440 
including real property acquisition and military construc-
tion projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of 
Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded 
through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 
2005 established by section 2906A of such Act, in the 
amount of $423,650,000. Such amount is in addition to 
the amount specified for such base closure and realign-
ment activities in section 2702 of this Act. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2007, for base closure and 
realignment activities authorized by subsection (a) and 
funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure 
Account 2005 in the total amount of $415,910,000. 
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF 
ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE 
XXXI—DEPARTMENT 
OF 
ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 
Sec. 3104. Defense nuclear waste disposal. 
Sec. 3105. Energy security and assurance.
1441 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 3111. Reliable Replacement Warhead program. 
Sec. 3112. Nuclear test readiness. 
Sec. 3113. Modification of reporting requirement. 
Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for Fissile Materials Disposition 
program. 
Sec. 3115. Modification of limitations on availability of funds for Waste Treat-
ment and Immobilization Plant. 
Sec. 3116. Modification of sunset date of the Office of the Ombudsman of the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Pro-
gram. 
Sec. 3117. Technical amendments. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
Sec. 3121. Study on using existing pits for the Reliable Replacement Warhead 
program. 
Sec. 3122. Report on retirement and dismantlement of nuclear warheads. 
Sec. 3123. Plan for addressing security risks posed to nuclear weapons com-
plex. 
Sec. 3124. Department of Energy protective forces. 
Sec. 3125. Evaluation of National Nuclear Security Administration strategic 
plan for advanced computing. 
Sec. 3126. Sense of Congress on the nuclear nonproliferation policy of the 
United States and the Reliable Replacement Warhead program. 
Sec. 3127. Department of Energy report on plan to strengthen and expand 
International Radiological Threat Reduction program. 
Sec. 3128. Department of Energy report on plan to strengthen and expand Ma-
terials Protection, Control, and Accounting program. 
Sec. 3129. Agreements and reports on nuclear forensics capabilities. 
Sec. 3130. Report on status of environmental management initiatives to accel-
erate the reduction of environmental risks and challenges posed 
by the legacy of the Cold War. 
Subtitle D—Nuclear Terrorism Prevention 
Sec. 3131. Definitions. 
Sec. 3132. Sense of Congress on the prevention of nuclear terrorism. 
Sec. 3133. Minimum security standard for nuclear weapons and formula quan-
tities of strategic special nuclear material. 
Sec. 3134. Annual report. 
Subtitle A—National Security 
Programs Authorizations 
SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRA-
TION. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds 
are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
1442 
ment of Energy for fiscal year 2008 for the activities of 
the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying 
out programs necessary for national security in the 
amount of $9,576,095,000, to be allocated as follows: 
(1) For weapons activities, $6,465,574,000. 
(2) For defense nuclear nonproliferation activi-
ties, $1,902,646,000. 
(3) For naval reactors, $808,219,000. 
(4) For the Office of the Administrator for Nu-
clear Security, $399,656,000. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.— 
From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available 
for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy 
may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear 
Security Administration as follows: 
(1) For readiness in technical base and facili-
ties, the following new plant projects: 
Project 08–D–801, High pressure fire 
loop, 
Pantex 
Plant, 
Amarillo, 
Texas, 
$7,000,000. 
Project 08–D–802, High explosive pressing 
facility, 
Pantex 
Plant, 
Amarillo, 
Texas, 
$25,300,000.
1443 
Project 08–D–804, Technical Area 55 re-
investment project, Los Alamos National Lab-
oratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $6,000,000. 
(2) For facilities and infrastructure recapital-
ization, the following new plant projects: 
Project 08–D–601, Mercury highway, Ne-
vada Test Site, Nevada, $7,800,000. 
Project 08–D–602, Potable water system 
upgrades, Y–12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 
$22,500,000. 
(3) For safeguards and security, the following 
new plant project: 
Project 08–D–701, Nuclear materials safe-
guards and security upgrade, Los Alamos Na-
tional Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 
$49,496,000. 
(4) For naval reactors, the following new plant 
projects: 
Project 08–D–901, Shipping and receiving 
and warehouse complex, Bettis Atomic Power 
Laboratory, 
West 
Mifflin, 
Pennsylvania, 
$9,000,000. 
Project 08–D–190, Project engineering 
and design, Expended Core Facility M–290 Re-
1456 
forcement or law-enforcement related ac-
tivities; 
(v) an assessment of the ability of the 
protective force at the site to fulfill any 
such law enforcement or law enforcement- 
related responsibilities; and 
(vi) an assessment of whether the pro-
tective force at the site is adequately 
staffed, trained, and equipped to comply 
with the requirements of the Design Basis 
Threat issued by the Department of En-
ergy in November 2005 and, if not, when 
it is projected to be. 
(C) An analysis comparing the manage-
ment, training, pay, benefits, duties, respon-
sibilities, and assignments of the protective 
force at each site identified under subparagraph 
(A) with the management, training, pay, bene-
fits, duties, responsibilities, and assignments of 
the Federal transportation security force of the 
Department of Energy. 
(D) A statement of options for managing 
the protective force at sites identified under 
subparagraph (A) in a more uniform manner, 
an analysis of the advantages and disadvan-