†
682
HR 1585 PP
nomic development in the provinces of Afghanistan,
including—
(A) a statement of the mission and objec-
tives of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in
Afghanistan;
(B) a description of the number, funding
(including the sources of funding), staffing re-
quirements, and current staffing levels of the
Provincial Reconstruction Teams, set forth by
United States Government agency;
(C) an evaluation of the effectiveness of each
Provincial Reconstruction Team, including each
team under the command of the United States
and each team under the command of the Inter-
national Security Assistance Force, in achieving
its mission and objectives; and
(D) a description of the collaboration, if
any, between the United States Agency for Inter-
national Development and Special Operations
Forces in such efforts, and an assessment of the
results of such collaboration.
(5) With respect to current counternarcotics ef-
forts in Afghanistan—
(A) a description of the counternarcotics
plan of the United States Government in Af-
†
683
HR 1585 PP
ghanistan, including a statement of priorities
among United States counterdrug activities (in-
cluding interdiction, eradication, and alternative
livelihood programs) within that plan, and a de-
scription of the specific resources allocated for
each such activity;
(B) a description of the counternarcotics
roles and missions assumed by the local and pro-
vincial governments of Afghanistan, the Govern-
ment of Afghanistan, particular departments
and agencies of the United States Government,
the International Security Assistance Force, and
other governments;
(C) a description of the extent, if any, to
which counternarcotics operations in or with re-
spect to Afghanistan have been determined to
constitute a United States military mission, and
the justification for that determination;
(D) a description of United States efforts to
destroy drug manufacturing facilities; and
(E) a description of United States efforts to
apprehend or eliminate major drug traffickers in
Afghanistan, and a description of the extent to
which such drug traffickers are currently assist-
ing United States counterterrorist efforts.
†
684
HR 1585 PP
(6) A description of current and proposed efforts
to help the Government of Afghanistan fight public
corruption and strengthen the rule of law.
(7) A description of current and proposed diplo-
matic and other efforts to encourage and assist the
Government of Pakistan to eliminate safe havens for
Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other extremists within the
territory of Pakistan which threaten the stability of
Afghanistan, and an evaluation of the cooperation of
the Government of Pakistan in eliminating such safe
havens.
(c) FORM.—Each report required by subsection (a)
shall be submitted in unclassified form to the maximum ex-
tent practicable, but may include a classified annex.
SEC. 1232. STRATEGY FOR ENHANCING SECURITY IN AF-
GHANISTAN BY ELIMINATING SAFE HAVENS
FOR VIOLENT EXTREMISTS IN PAKISTAN.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Since September 11, 2001, the Government of
Pakistan has been an important partner in helping
the United States remove the Taliban regime from Af-
ghanistan.
(2) In early September 2006, the Government of
Pakistan signed a peace agreement with pro-Taliban
militants in Miramshah, North Waziristan, Pakistan.
†
685
HR 1585 PP
Under the agreement, local tribesmen in North
Waziristan agreed to halt cross-border movement of
pro-Taliban insurgents from the North Waziristan
area to Afghanistan and to remove all foreigners who
do not respect the peace and abide by the agreement.
(3) In late September 2006, United States mili-
tary officials in Kabul, Afghanistan, reported two-
fold, and in cases three-fold, increases in the number
of cross-border attacks along the Afghanistan border
with Pakistan in the weeks following the signing of
the agreement referred to in paragraph (2).
(4) On February 13, 2007, Lieutenant General
Karl W. Eikenberry, the former commanding general
of Combined Forces Command—Afghanistan, stated
in a written statement to the Committee on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives that ‘‘Al
Qaeda and Taliban leadership presence inside Paki-
stan remains a significant problem that must be sat-
isfactorily addressed if we are to prevail in Afghani-
stan and if we are to defeat the global threat posed
by international terrorism’’.
(5) On February 27, 2007, John McConnell, the
Director of National Intelligence, stated in a written
statement to the Committee on Armed Services of the
Senate that ‘‘[e]liminating the safehaven that the
†
686
HR 1585 PP
Taliban and other extremists have found in Paki-
stan’s tribal areas is not sufficient to end the insur-
gency in Afghanistan but it is necessary’’.
(b) STRATEGY RELATING TO PAKISTAN.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the President
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report describing the long-term strategy of the United
States to engage with the Government of Pakistan—
(A) to prevent the movement of Taliban, Al
Qaeda, and other violent extremist forces across
the border of Pakistan into Afghanistan; and
(B) to eliminate safe havens for such forces
on the national territory of Pakistan.
(2) FORM.—The report shall be submitted in un-
classified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE COALITION SUPPORT FUNDS FOR PAKISTAN.—
(1) LIMITATION.—For fiscal years 2008 and
2009, the Government of Pakistan may not be reim-
bursed in any fiscal year quarter for the provision to
the United States of logistical, military, or other sup-
port utilizing funds appropriated or otherwise made
available by an Act making supplemental appropria-
tions for fiscal year 2007 for operations in Iraq and
†
687
HR 1585 PP
Afghanistan, or any other Act, for the purpose of
making payments to reimburse key cooperating na-
tions for the provision to the United States of such
support unless the President certifies to the congres-
sional defense committees for such fiscal year quarter
that the Government of Pakistan is making substan-
tial and sustained efforts to eliminate safe havens for
the Taliban, Al Qaeda and other violent extremists in
areas under its sovereign control, including in the cit-
ies of Quetta and Chaman and in the Northwest
Frontier Province and the Federally Administered
Tribal Areas.
(2) CONTENT OF CERTIFICATION.—Each certifi-
cation submitted under paragraph (1) shall include a
detailed description of the efforts made by the Govern-
ment of Pakistan to eliminate safe havens for the
Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other violent extremists in
areas under its sovereign control.
(3) FORM.—Each certification submitted under
paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form,
but may include a classified annex.
(4) WAIVER.—The President may waive the lim-
itation on reimbursements under paragraph (1) for a
fiscal year quarter if the President determines and
certifies to the congressional defense committees that
†
688
HR 1585 PP
it is important to the national security interest of the
United States to do so.
SEC. 1233. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF UPDATE ON REPORT
ON CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BOMBING OF
THE LABELLE DISCOTHEQUE.
Section 1225(b)(2) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119
Stat. 3465) is amended by striking ‘‘Not later than one year
after enactment of this Act,’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than
each of January 6, 2007, and January 7, 2008,’’.
SEC. 1234. REPORT ON PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF UNITED STATES ENGAGEMENT AND POL-
ICY TOWARD DARFUR.
(a) REQUIREMENT FOR REPORTS.—Not later than 120
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall submit
to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the
policy of the United States to address the crisis in Darfur,
in eastern Chad, and in north-eastern Central African Re-
public, and on the contributions of the Department of De-
fense and the Department of State to the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO), the United Nations, and the
African Union in support of the current African Union
Mission in Sudan (AMIS) or any covered United Nations
mission.
†
689
HR 1585 PP
(b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the extent to which the Gov-
ernment of Sudan is in compliance with its obliga-
tions under international law and as a member of the
United Nations, including under United Nations Se-
curity Council Resolutions 1706 (2006) and 1591
(2005), and a description of any violations of such
obligations, including violations relating to the denial
of or delay in facilitating access by AMIS and United
Nations peacekeepers to conflict areas, failure to im-
plement responsibilities to demobilize and disarm the
Janjaweed militias, obstruction of the voluntary safe
return of internally displaced persons and refugees,
and degradation of security of and access to humani-
tarian supply routes.
(2) A comprehensive explanation of the policy of
the United States to address the crisis in Darfur, in-
cluding the activities of the Department of Defense
and the Department of State.
(3) A comprehensive assessment of the impact of
a no-fly zone for Darfur, including an assessment of
the impact of such a no-fly zone on humanitarian ef-
forts in Darfur and the region and a plan to mini-
†
690
HR 1585 PP
mize any negative impact on such humanitarian ef-
forts during the implementation of such a no-fly zone.
(4) A description of contributions made by the
Department of Defense and the Department of State
in support of NATO assistance to AMIS and any cov-
ered United Nations mission.
(5) An assessment of the extent to which addi-
tional resources are necessary to meet the obligations
of the United States to AMIS and any covered United
Nations mission.
(c) FORM AND AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS.—
(1) FORM.—Each report submitted under this
section shall be in an unclassified form, but may in-
clude a classified annex.
(2) AVAILABILITY.—The unclassified portion of
any report submitted under this section shall be made
available to the public.
(d) REPEAL
OF SUPERSEDED REPORT REQUIRE-
MENT.—Section 1227 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–
364; 120 Stat. 2426) is repealed.
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) 
APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMIT-
TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional commit-
tees’’ means—
†
691
HR 1585 PP
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Sen-
ate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House
of Representatives.
(2) COVERED
UNITED
NATIONS
MISSION.—The
term ‘‘covered United Nations mission’’ means any
United Nations-African Union hybrid peacekeeping
operation in Darfur, and any United Nations peace-
keeping operating in Darfur, eastern Chad, or north-
ern Central African Republic, that is deployed on or
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 1235. REPORT ON THE AIRFIELD IN ABECHE, CHAD,
AND OTHER RESOURCES NEEDED TO PRO-
VIDE STABILITY IN THE DARFUR REGION.
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress
that—
(1) the airfield located in Abeche, Republic of
Chad, could play a significant role in potential
United Nations, African Union, or North Atlantic
Treaty Organization humanitarian, peacekeeping, or
other military operations in Darfur, Sudan, or the
surrounding region; and
†
692
HR 1585 PP
(2) the capacity of that airfield to serve as a sub-
stantial link in such operations should be assessed,
along with the projected costs and specific upgrades
that would be necessary for its expanded use, should
the Government of Chad agree to its improvement and
use for such purposes.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall,
in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the matters
as follows:
(1) The current capacity of the existing airfield
in Abeche, Republic of Chad, including the scope of
its current use by the international community in re-
sponse to the crisis in the Darfur region.
(2) The upgrades, and their associated costs, nec-
essary to enable the airfield in Abeche, Republic of
Chad, to be improved to be fully capable of accommo-
dating a humanitarian, peacekeeping, or other force
deployment of the size foreseen by the recent United
Nations resolutions calling for a United Nations de-
ployment to Chad and a hybrid force of the United
Nations and African Union operating under Chapter
VII of the United Nations Charter for Sudan.
†
693
HR 1585 PP
(3) The force size and composition of an inter-
national effort estimated to be necessary to provide
protection to those Darfur civilian populations cur-
rently displaced in the Darfur region.
(4) The force size and composition of an inter-
national effort estimated to be necessary to provide
broader stability within the Darfur region.
SEC. 1236. INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON ASYMMETRIC
CAPABILITIES IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILI-
TARY POWER OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA.
Section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 10 U.S.C.
113 note) is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(9) Developments in asymmetric capabilities,
including cyberwarfare, including—
‘‘(A) detailed analyses of the countries tar-
geted;
‘‘(B) the specific vulnerabilities targeted in
these countries;
‘‘(C) the tactical and strategic effects sought
by developing threats to such targets; and
†
694
HR 1585 PP
‘‘(D) an appendix detailing specific exam-
ples of tests and development of these asymmetric
capabilities.’’.
SEC. 1237. APPLICATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILI-
TARY JUSTICE TO MILITARY CONTRACTORS
DURING A TIME OF WAR.
The Secretary of Defense shall report within 60 days
of enactment of this Act to House Armed Service Committee
and the Senate Armed Services Committee on the status of
implementing section 552 of the John Warner National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law
109–364) related to the application of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice to military contractors during a time
of war or a contingency operation.
SEC. 1238. REPORT ON FAMILY REUNIONS BETWEEN
UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND THEIR REL-
ATIVES IN NORTH KOREA.
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President
shall submit to Congress a report on family reunions be-
tween United States citizens and their relatives in the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
†
695
HR 1585 PP
(1) An estimate of the current number of United
States citizens with relatives in North Korea, and an
estimate of the current number of such United States
citizens who are more than 70 years of age.
(2) An estimate of the number of United States
citizens who have traveled to North Korea for family
reunions.
(3) An estimate of the amounts of money and
aid that went from the Korean-American community
to North Korea in 2007.
(4) A summary of any allegations of fraud by
third-party brokers in arranging family reunions be-
tween United States citizens and their relatives in
North Korea.
(5) A description of the efforts, if any, of the
President to facilitate reunions between the United
States citizens and their relatives in North Korea, in-
cluding the following:
(A) Negotiating with the Democratic Peo-
ple’s Republic of Korea to permit family re-
unions between United States citizens and their
relatives in North Korea.
(B) Planning, in the event of a normaliza-
tion of relations between the United States and
the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, to
†
696
HR 1585 PP
dedicate personnel and resources at the United
States embassy in Pyongyang, Democratic Peo-
ple’s Republic of Korea, to facilitate reunions be-
tween United States citizens and their relatives
in North Korea.
(C) Informing Korean-American families of
fraudulent practices by certain third-party bro-
kers who arrange reunions between United States
citizens and their relatives in North Korea, and
seeking an end to such practices.
(D) Developing standards for safe and
transparent family reunions overseas involving
United States citizens and their relatives in
North Korea.
(6) What additional efforts in the areas described
in paragraph (5), if any, the President would con-
sider desirable and feasible.
SEC. 1239. REPORTS ON PREVENTION OF MASS ATROCITIES.
(a) DEPARTMENT OF STATE REPORT.—
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—Not later than 120
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of State shall submit to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Af-
fairs of the House of Representatives a report assess-
†
697
HR 1585 PP
ing the capability of the Department of State to pro-
vide training and guidance to the command of an
international intervention force that seeks to prevent
mass atrocities.
(2) CONTENT.—The report required under para-
graph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An evaluation of any doctrine currently
used by the Secretary of State to prepare for the
training and guidance of the command of an
international intervention force.
(B) An assessment of the role played by the
United States in developing the ‘‘responsibility
to protect’’ doctrine described in paragraphs 138
through 140 of the outcome document of the
High-level Plenary Meeting of the General As-
sembly adopted by the United Nations in Sep-
tember 2005, and an update on actions taken by
the United States Mission to the United Nations
to discuss, promote, and implement such doc-
trine.
(C) An assessment of the potential capa-
bility of the Department of State and other Fed-
eral departments and agencies to support the de-
velopment of new doctrines for the training and
guidance of an international intervention force
†
698
HR 1585 PP
in keeping with the ‘‘responsibility to protect’’
doctrine.
(D) Recommendations as to the steps nec-
essary to allow the Secretary of State to provide
more effective training and guidance to an inter-
national intervention force.
(b) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT.—
(1) REPORT
REQUIRED.—Not later than 120
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Af-
fairs of the House of Representatives a report assess-
ing the capability of the Department of Defense to
provide training and guidance to the command of an
international intervention force that seeks to prevent
mass atrocities.
(2) CONTENT.—The report required under para-
graph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An evaluation of any doctrine currently
used by the Secretary of Defense to prepare for
the training and guidance of the command of an
international intervention force.
(B) An assessment of the potential capa-
bility of the Department of Defense and other
†
699
HR 1585 PP
Federal departments and agencies to support the
development of new doctrines for the training
and guidance of an international intervention
force in keeping with the ‘‘responsibility to pro-
tect’’ doctrine.
(C) Recommendations as to the steps nec-
essary to allow the Secretary of Defense to pro-
vide more effective training and guidance to an
international intervention force.
(D) A summary of any assessments or stud-
ies of the Department of Defense or other Federal
departments or agencies relating to ‘‘Operation
Artemis’’, the 2004 French military deployment
and intervention in the eastern region of the
Democratic Republic of Congo to protect civil-
ians from local warring factions.
(c) INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION FORCE.—For the
purposes of this section, ‘‘international intervention force’’
means a military force that—
(1) is authorized by the United Nations; and
(2) has a mission that is narrowly focused on the
protection of civilian life and the prevention of mass
atrocities such as genocide.
†
700
HR 1585 PP
TITLE 
XIII—COOPERATIVE
THREAT 
REDUCTION 
WITH
STATES OF THE FORMER SO-
VIET UNION
SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.
(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUC-
TION PROGRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and other
provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams are the programs specified in section 1501(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997
(50 U.S.C. 2362 note), as amended by section 1303 of this
Act.
(b) FISCAL YEAR 2008 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUC-
TION FUNDS DEFINED.—As used in this title, the term ‘‘fis-
cal year 2008 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds’’ means
the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 301 for Cooperative Threat Reduc-
tion programs.
(c) AVAILABILITY
OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be
available for obligation for three fiscal years.
†
701
HR 1585 PP
SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.
(a) FUNDING
FOR
SPECIFIC
PURPOSES.—Of the
$428,048,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2008 in section 301(19) for
Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following
amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination in
Russia, $102,885,000.
(2) For nuclear weapons storage security in Rus-
sia, $22,988,000.
(3) For nuclear weapons transportation security
in Russia, $37,700,000.
(4) For weapons of mass destruction prolifera-
tion prevention in the states of the former Soviet
Union, $51,986,000.
(5) For biological weapons proliferation preven-
tion in the former Soviet Union, $194,489,000.
(6) For chemical weapons destruction in Russia,
$1,000,000.
(7) For threat reduction outside the former So-
viet Union, $10,000,000.
(8) 
For 
defense 
and 
military 
contacts,
$8,000,000.
(9) For activities designated as Other Assess-
ments/Administrative Support, $19,000,000.
†
702
HR 1585 PP
(b) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS FOR OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2008 Coop-
erative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or ex-
pended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in para-
graphs (1) through (9) of subsection (a) until 30 days after
the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress
a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated
or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or ex-
pended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed
as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year
2008 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for
which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifi-
cally prohibited under this title or any other provision of
law.
(c) LIMITED
AUTHORITY
TO
VARY
INDIVIDUAL
AMOUNTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in
any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines
that it is necessary to do so in the national interest,
the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for
fiscal year 2008 for a purpose listed in paragraphs
(1) through (9) of subsection (a) in excess of the spe-
cific amount authorized for that purpose.
(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation
of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1)
†
703
HR 1585 PP
through (9) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific
amount authorized for such purpose may be made
using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only
after—
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress noti-
fication of the intent to do so together with a
complete discussion of the justification for doing
so; and
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date
of the notification.
SEC. 1303. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT RE-
DUCTION PROGRAMS IN STATES OUTSIDE
THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
Section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note) is
amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection (b)’’
and inserting ‘‘subsections (b) and (c)’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(c) SPECIFIED
PROGRAMS
WITH
RESPECT
TO
STATES OUTSIDE THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.—The pro-
grams referred to in subsection (a) are the following pro-
grams with respect to states that are not states of the former
Soviet Union:
†
704
HR 1585 PP
‘‘(1) Programs to facilitate the elimination, and
safe and secure transportation and storage, of biologi-
cal, or chemical weapons, materials, weapons compo-
nents, or weapons-related materials.
‘‘(2) Programs to prevent the proliferation of nu-
clear, chemical, or biological weapons, weapons com-
ponents, and weapons-related military technology and
expertise.
‘‘(3) Programs to facilitate detection and report-
ing of highly pathogenic diseases or other diseases
that are associated with or that could be utilized as
an early warning mechanism for disease outbreaks
that could impact the Armed Forces of the United
States or allies of the United States.’’.
SEC. 1304. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE COOPER-
ATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS OUTSIDE
THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
Section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat.
1662; 22 U.S.C. 5963) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the President’’
the second place it appears and inserting ‘‘the Sec-
retary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Sec-
retary of State,’’; and
(2) in subsection (d)—
†
705
HR 1585 PP
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the
President’’ the second place it appears and in-
serting ‘‘the Secretary of Defense, with the con-
currence of the Secretary of State,’’; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘the
President’’ and inserting ‘‘the Secretary of De-
fense and the Secretary of State’’.
SEC. 1305. REPEAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON ASSISTANCE TO
STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION FOR
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—
(1) SOVIET NUCLEAR THREAT REDUCTION ACT
OF 1991.—The Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of
1991 (title II of Public Law 102–228; 22 U.S.C. 2551
note) is amended—
(A) by striking section 211; and
(B) in section 212, by striking ‘‘, consistent
with the findings stated in section 211,’’.
(2) COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACT OF
1993.—Section 1203 of the Cooperative Threat Reduc-
tion Act of 1993 (22 U.S.C. 5952) is amended by
striking subsection (d).
(3) RUSSIAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS DESTRUCTION
FACILITIES.—Section 1305 of the National Defense
†
706
HR 1585 PP
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law
106–65; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note) is repealed.
(4) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1303 of the
Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 22
U.S.C. 5952 note) is repealed.
(b) INAPPLICABILITY OF OTHER RESTRICTIONS.—Sec-
tion 502 of the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian
Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992 (22
U.S.C. 5852) shall not apply to any Cooperative Threat Re-
duction program.
SEC. 1306. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES STUDY OF
PREVENTION OF PROLIFERATION OF BIO-
LOGICAL WEAPONS.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—Not later than 60 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of De-
fense shall enter into an arrangement with the National
Academy of Sciences under which the Academy shall carry
out a study to identify areas for cooperation with states
other than states of the former Soviet Union under the Co-
operative Threat Reduction program of the Department of
Defense in the prevention of proliferation of biological
weapons.
†
707
HR 1585 PP
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED IN STUDY.—The Sec-
retary shall provide for the study under subsection (a) to
include the following:
(1) An assessment of trends in the biological
sciences and biotechnology that will affect the capa-
bilities of governments of developing countries to con-
trol the containment and use of dual-use technologies
of potential interest to terrorist organizations or indi-
viduals with hostile intentions.
(2) An assessment of the approaches to coopera-
tive threat reduction used by the states of the former
Soviet Union that are of special relevance in pre-
venting the proliferation of biological weapons in
other areas of the world.
(3) A review of programs of the United States
Government and other governments, international or-
ganizations, foundations, and other private sector en-
tities used in developing countries that are not states
of the former Soviet Union that may contribute to the
prevention of the proliferation of biological weapons.
(4) Recommendations on steps for integrating
activities of the Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
gram relating to the prevention of the proliferation of
biological weapons with activities of other depart-
ments and agencies of the United States addressing