HR 5122 PCS 
craft that is retired by the Secretary after September 30, 
2006, in a condition that would allow recall of that aircraft 
to future service. 
SEC. 137. AIR FORCE PROGRAM. 
(a) SCIENCE ENGINEERING LAB DATA INTEGRA-
TION.—The amount provided in section 103 for Other 
Procurement, 
Air 
Force, 
is 
hereby 
increased 
by 
$6,000,000, to be available for Science Engineering Lab 
Data Integration (SELDI) at the Ogden Air Logistics 
Center, Utah. 
(b) OFFSET.—The amount provided in section 
201(4) for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, 
Defense-wide, is hereby reduced by $6,000,000, to be de-
rived from Information and Communications Technology 
(Program Element 0602301E). 
TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOP-
MENT, TEST, AND EVALUA-
TION 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 
Sec. 202. Amount for defense science and technology. 
Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 211. Alternate engine for Joint Strike Fighter. 
Sec. 212. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology 
achievements. 
Sec. 213. Extension of Defense Acquisition Challenge Program. 
Sec. 214. Future Combat Systems milestone review. 
Sec. 215. Independent cost analyses for Joint Strike Fighter engine program. 
Sec. 216. Dedicated amounts for implementing or evaluating DD(X) and CVN– 
21 proposals under Defense Acquisition Challenge Program. 
Subtitle C—Ballistic Missile Defense 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
Sec. 221. Fielding of ballistic missile defense capabilities. 
Sec. 222. Limitation on use of funds for space-based interceptor. 
Sec. 223. High altitude air ship program. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
Sec. 231. Review of test and evaluation policies and practices to address emerg-
ing acquisition approaches. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal year 2007 for the use of the Department of Defense 
for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $10,932,209,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $17,377,769,000. 
(3) For the Air Force, $24,810,041,000. 
(4) 
For 
Defense-wide 
activities, 
$20,944,559,000, of which $181,520,000 is author-
ized for the Director of Operational Test and Eval-
uation. 
SEC. 202. AMOUNT FOR DEFENSE SCIENCE AND TECH-
NOLOGY. 
(a) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Of the amounts authorized 
to be appropriated by section 201, $11,735,555,000 shall 
be available for the Defense Science and Technology Pro-
gram, including basic research, applied research, and ad-
vanced technology development projects. 
(b) BASIC RESEARCH, APPLIED RESEARCH, AND AD-
VANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DEFINED.—For 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
purposes of this section, the term ‘‘basic research, applied 
research, and advanced technology development’’ means 
work funded in program elements for defense research and 
development under Department of Defense category 6.1, 
6.2, or 6.3. 
Subtitle 
B—Program 
Require-
ments, Restrictions, and Limita-
tions 
SEC. 211. ALTERNATE ENGINE FOR JOINT STRIKE FIGHT-
ER. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the 
Departments of the Navy and Air Force for the system 
development and demonstration program for the Joint 
Strike Fighter, not less than $408,000,000 shall be obli-
gated for continued development of an alternate engine for 
the Joint Strike Fighter. 
SEC. 212. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES 
FOR 
ADVANCED 
TECHNOLOGY 
ACHIEVE-
MENTS. 
Section 2374a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting 
‘‘September 30, 2010’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
SEC. 213. EXTENSION OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION CHAL-
LENGE PROGRAM. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Section 2359b of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking subsection (j). 
(b) CONFIDENTIALITY.—Such section is further 
amended in subsection (g)— 
(1) by amending the heading to read as follows: 
‘‘CONFLICTS
OF
INTEREST
AND
CONFIDENTIAL-
ITY.—’’; and 
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ‘‘and that the identity of any person or ac-
tivity submitting a challenge proposal is not dis-
closed outside the Federal Government without the 
consent of the person or activity’’. 
SEC. 214. FUTURE COMBAT SYSTEMS MILESTONE REVIEW. 
(a) MILESTONE REVIEW REQUIRED.—After the pre-
liminary design review of the Future Combat Systems pro-
gram, but in no event later than the end of fiscal year 
2008, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a Defense 
Acquisition Board milestone review of the Future Combat 
Systems program. The milestone review shall include an 
assessment as to each of the following: 
(1) Whether the warfighter’s needs are valid 
and can be best met with the concept of the pro-
gram. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
HR 5122 PCS 
(2) Whether the concept of the program can be 
developed and produced within existing resources. 
(3) Whether the program should continue. 
(b) DETERMINATIONS TO BE MADE IN ASSESSING 
WHETHER PROGRAM SHOULD CONTINUE.—In making 
the assessment required by subsection (a)(3), the Sec-
retary shall make a determination with respect to each of 
the following: 
(1) Whether each critical technology for the 
program is at least Technical Readiness Level 6. 
(2) For each system and network component of 
the program, what the key design and technology 
risks are, based on System Functional Reviews, Pre-
liminary Design Reviews, and Technical Readiness 
Levels. 
(3) Whether actual demonstrations, rather than 
simulations, have shown that the concept of the pro-
gram will work. 
(4) Whether actual demonstrations, rather than 
plans, have shown that the software for the program 
is functional. 
(5) What the cost estimate for the program is. 
(6) What the affordability assessment for the 
program is, based on that cost estimate. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 15, 2006
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5122.PCS
H5122
hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS