datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4405
To amend section 3332 of title 31, United States Code, to allow recipients
of Federal payments to ‘‘opt out’’ of the direct deposit requirements
under the EFT ’99 program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AUGUST 5, 1998
Mr. ADERHOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
A BILL
To amend section 3332 of title 31, United States Code,
to allow recipients of Federal payments to ‘‘opt out’’
of the direct deposit requirements under the EFT ’99
program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Payments Op-
tion Act’’.
SEC. 2. RECIPIENTS OF FEDERAL PAYMENTS AUTHORIZED
TO ‘‘OPT OUT’’ OF EFT 99 REQUIREMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3332(f) of title 31, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow-
ing new paragraph:
‘‘(3) RECIPIENTS AUTHORIZED TO ‘OPT OUT’
OF
ELECTRONIC
FUNDS
TRANSFER
REQUIRE-
MENT.—This subsection shall not apply with respect
to any recipient of a Federal payment who notifies
the Secretary of the Treasury, on a form that the
Secretary shall provide upon request, that the recipi-
ent elects to not receive such payment by an elec-
tronic funds transfer.’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—
Section 3332(f)(1) of title 31, United States Code, is
amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘para-
graphs (2) and (3)’’.
Æ
H. Res. 295 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
June 10, 2015. 
Whereas the United States Department of Justice issued a 
report titled, ‘‘Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras’’, 
which details a number of benefits of body-worn cameras, 
including— 
(1) increased transparency and citizen views of po-
lice legitimacy; 
(2) improved behavior and civility among both police 
officers and citizens; and 
(3) increased evidentiary benefits that expedite reso-
lution of citizen complaints or lawsuits and improving 
evidence for arrest and prosecution; and 
Whereas the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Crimi-
nology conducted a 12-month study on the use of body- 
worn cameras used by law enforcement in the United 
Kingdom and estimated that the cameras led to a 50 per-
cent reduction in use of force, and in addition, complaints 
against police fell approximately by 90 percent: Now, 
therefore, be it 
Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
(1) recognizes all law enforcement agencies and offi-
cers for their tireless work to protect us and make our 
communities safer;
•HRES 295 EH 
(2) recognizes the potential for the use of body- 
worn cameras by on-duty law enforcement officers to im-
prove community relations, increase transparency, and 
protect both citizens and police; and 
(3) encourages State and local law enforcement 
agencies to consider the use of body-worn cameras, in-
cluding policies and protocols to handle privacy, storage, 
and other relevant concerns. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4406
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
to provide that any participant or beneficiary under an employee benefit
plan shall be entitled to de novo review in court of benefit determinations
under such plan.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AUGUST 5, 1998
Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Secu-
rity Act of 1974 to provide that any participant or
beneficiary under an employee benefit plan shall be enti-
tled to de novo review in court of benefit determinations
under such plan.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DE NOVO REVIEW OF BENEFIT DETERMINA-
TIONS.
Section 502(e) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1132(e)) is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(3) Notwithstanding any provision by the plan for
the exercise by a fidiciary of discretionary authority with
respect to any benefit determination, any benefit deter-
mination under the plan shall be subject to de novo review
by the court.’’.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendment made by section 1 of this Act shall
apply with respect to causes of action arising after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. RES. 295 
Supporting local law enforcement agencies in their continued work to serve 
our communities, and supporting their use of body worn cameras to 
promote transparency to protect both citizens and officers alike. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 3, 2015 
Mr. AL GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. CLARKE of New 
York, Mr. CLAY, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, and Mr. 
YODER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
RESOLUTION 
Supporting local law enforcement agencies in their continued 
work to serve our communities, and supporting their 
use of body worn cameras to promote transparency to 
protect both citizens and officers alike. 
Whereas the United States Department of Justice issued a 
report titled, ‘‘Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras’’, 
which details a number of benefits of body-worn cameras, 
including— 
(1) increased transparency and citizen views of po-
lice legitimacy; 
(2) improved behavior and civility among both police 
officers and citizens; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:10 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR295.IH
HR295
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 295 IH 
(3) increased evidentiary benefits that expedite reso-
lution of citizen complaints or lawsuits and improving 
evidence for arrest and prosecution; and 
Whereas the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Crimi-
nology conducted a 12-month study on the use of body- 
worn cameras used by law enforcement in the United 
Kingdom and estimated that the cameras led to a 50 per-
cent reduction in use of force, and in addition, complaints 
against police fell approximately by 90 percent: Now, 
therefore, be it 
Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
(1) recognizes all law enforcement agencies and 
officers for their tireless work to protect us and 
make our communities safer; 
(2) recognizes the potential for the use of body- 
worn cameras by on-duty law enforcement officers to 
improve community relations, increase transparency, 
and protect both citizens and police; and 
(3) encourages State and local law enforcement 
agencies to consider the use of body-worn cameras, 
including policies and protocols to handle privacy, 
storage, and other relevant concerns. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:10 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR295.IH
HR295
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV 
114TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. RES. 296 
Calling for Sickle Cell Trait research. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 3, 2015 
Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 
RANGEL, Mr. RUSH, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. AL GREEN of 
Texas, Mrs. DINGELL, and Mr. CONYERS) submitted the following resolu-
tion; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
RESOLUTION 
Calling for Sickle Cell Trait research. 
Whereas Sickle Cell Disease is the most common inherited 
blood disorder in the United States, affecting approxi-
mately 100,000 people in the United States; 
Whereas more than 3,000,000 people in the United States 
have the Sickle Cell Trait and many are unaware of their 
status; 
Whereas African-Americans (1 in 12) and Hispanic Ameri-
cans (1 in 100) are most at risk for carrying the Sickle 
Cell Trait, and the trait has been found in persons of 
Greek, Italian, East Indian, Saudi Arabian, Asian, Syr-
ian, Turkish, Cypriot, Sicilian, and Caucasian origin; 
Whereas individuals who have Sickle Cell Trait have a 50- 
percent chance of passing on the abnormal sickle cell 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:53 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR296.IH
HR296
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 296 IH 
gene to future offspring and 25-percent chance of having 
future children with Sickle Cell Disease if both parents 
have the trait; 
Whereas individuals with Sickle Cell Trait have the same life 
expectancy as the general population, but are at risk for 
certain conditions including, blood in the urine, kidney 
cancer, complications with trauma to the eye, tissue 
death in the spleen at high altitudes, or may have a false 
positive A1C test; 
Whereas according to a 2007 study in the American Journal 
of Medical Genetics, all States have been required to 
screen for Sickle Cell Disease/Trait since 2006, however, 
most States lack a protocol for disseminating results of 
trait status, with parents being notified only 37 percent 
of the time; 
Whereas communication of a screening result consistent with 
Sickle Cell Trait should always be accompanied by appro-
priate counseling on the implications, provided by an in-
dividual with adequate training and understanding of the 
information; 
Whereas the limited research on the communication of Sickle 
Cell Trait test results to patients demonstrates that there 
is a high prevalence of misleading information being com-
municated during counseling sessions for Sickle Cell 
Trait following newborn screening by clinicians; 
Whereas no studies have examined whether information on 
Sickle Cell Trait test results are being accurately trans-
mitted to an individual, whether by a family member or 
healthcare provider, prior to a person’s reproductive 
years; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:31 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR296.IH
HR296
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
of the excess referred to in section 102(d)(2)(B) for
such month.’’.
(c) EXCLUSION FROM UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA-
TION TAXES.—Subsection (s) of section 3306 of such
Code is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(s) TIPS NOT TREATED AS WAGES.—For purposes
of this chapter, the term ‘wages’ shall include tips received
in any month only to the extent includible in gross income
under section 102(d)(2) for such month.’’
(d) EXCLUSION FROM WAGE WITHHOLDING.—Para-
graph (16) of section 3401(a) of such Code is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘(16)(A) as tips in any medium other than
cash;
‘‘(B) as cash tips to an employee in any cal-
endar month in the course of his employment by an
employer unless the amount of such cash tips is $20
or more and then only to the extent of the excess re-
ferred to in section 102(d)(2)(B) for such month;’’
(e) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Sections
32(c)(2)(A)(i) and 220(b)(4)(A) of such Code are each
amended by striking ‘‘tips’’ and inserting ‘‘tips (to the ex-
tent includible in gross income under section 102(d)(2))’’.
(f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to tips received after the calendar
•HRES 296 IH 
Whereas Congress recognizes the importance of ensuring that 
people in the United States can make informed decisions 
as a result of awareness of their Sickle Cell Trait status: 
Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
(1) recognizes the ongoing challenges in ad-
dressing health outcomes among people with Sickle 
Cell Trait and Sickle Cell Disease; 
(2) encourages the medical community, in co-
ordination with the State and Federal Government, 
to work to ensure that all individuals are made 
aware of their SCT status by developing a common 
strategy for dissemination of screening results, edu-
cation, and counseling to parents and families in col-
laboration with all 50 States’ newborn screening 
programs; 
(3) calls on the United States Department of 
Health and Human Services, in collaboration with 
experts, to develop a public awareness campaign re-
garding the importance of knowing one’s Sickle Cell 
Trait status for all racial and ethnic groups in the 
United States; 
(4) calls on the United States Department of 
Health and Human Services to expand access for 
screening and appropriate counseling for carriers of 
Sickle Cell Trait; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
04:31 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR296.IH
HR296
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HRES 296 IH 
(5) commits to ensuring support for research 
that expands our understanding of the health out-
comes and other implications of Sickle Cell Trait 
and the health outcomes associated with Sickle Cell 
Disease. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
03:53 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 049200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR296.IH
HR296
smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4408
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tips shall
not be subject to income or employment taxes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AUGUST 5, 1998
Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that tips shall not be subject to income or employment taxes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TIPS NOT SUBJECT TO INCOME OR EMPLOY-
MENT TAXES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102 of the Internal Reve-
nue Code of 1986 (relating to gifts and inheritances) is
amended by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(d) TIPS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection
(a), tips shall be treated as property transferred by
gift.
‘‘(2) EMPLOYEE TAXABLE ON AT LEAST MINI-
MUM WAGE.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to tips
received by an employee during any month to the ex-
tent that such tips—
‘‘(A) are deemed to have been paid by the
employer to the employee pursuant to section
3121(q) (without regard to whether such tips
are reported under section 6053), and
‘‘(B) do not exceed the excess of—
‘‘(i) the minimum wage rate applica-
ble to such individual under section 6(a)(1)
of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
(determined without regard to section 3(m)
of such Act), over
‘‘(ii) the amount of the wages (exclud-
ing tips) paid by the employer to the em-
ployee during such month.’’
(b) EXCLUSION FROM SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES.—
(1) Paragraph (12) of section 3121(a) of such
Code is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(12)(A) tips paid in any medium other than
cash;
‘‘(B) cash tips received by an employee in any
calendar month in the course of his employment by
an employer unless the amount of such cash tips is
$20 or more and then only to the extent of the ex-
cess referred to in section 102(d)(2)(B) for such
month;’’.
(2) Paragraph (10) of section 209(a) of the So-
cial Security Act is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(10)(A) tips paid in any medium other than
cash;
‘‘(B) cash tips received by an employee in any
calendar month in the course of his employment by
an employer unless the amount of such cash tips is
$20 or more and then only to the extent of the ex-
cess referred to in section 102(d)(2)(B) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code of 1986 for such month;’’.
(3) Paragraph (3) of section 3231(e) of such
Code is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(3) Solely for purposes of the taxes imposed
by section 3201 and other provisions of this chapter
insofar as they relate to such taxes, the term ‘com-
pensation’ also includes cash tips received by an em-
ployee in any calendar month in the course of his
employment by an employer if the amount of such
cash tips is $20 or more and then only to the extent
month which includes the date of the enactment of this
Act.
Æ
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 440
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain corporations
and certain trusts to be shareholders of subchapter S corporations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 9, 1997
Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow cer-
tain corporations and certain trusts to be shareholders
of subchapter S corporations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORATIONS ALLOWED TO BE SHAREHOLD-
ERS OF SUBCHAPTER S CORPORATIONS IN
CERTAIN CASES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 1361 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining S corpora-
tion) is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow-
ing new paragraph:
•HRES 29 EH 
Lance; Mr. Guthrie; Mr. Olson; Mr. McKinley; Mr. Pompeo; 
Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois; Mr. Griffith; Mr. Bilirakis; Mr. 
Johnson of Ohio; Mr. Long; Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina; 
Mr. Bucshon; Mr. Flores; Mrs. Brooks of Indiana; Mr. 
Mullin; Mr. Hudson; Mr. Collins of New York; and Mr. 
Cramer. 
COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. King of New 
York; Mr. Royce; Mr. Lucas; Mr. Garrett; Mr. Neugebauer; 
Mr. McHenry; Mr. Pearce; Mr. Posey; Mr. Fitzpatrick; Mr. 
Westmoreland; Mr. Luetkemeyer; Mr. Huizenga of Michigan; 
Mr. Duffy; Mr. Hurt of Virginia; Mr. Stivers; Mr. Fincher; 
Mr. Stutzman; Mr. Mulvaney; Mr. Hultgren; Mr. Ross; Mr. 
Pittenger; Mrs. Wagner; Mr. Barr; Mr. Rothfus; Mr. Messer; 
Mr. Schweikert; Mr. Dold; Mr. Guinta; Mr. Tipton; Mr. Wil-
liams; Mr. Poliquin; Mrs. Love; and Mr. Hill. 
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Smith of New 
Jersey; Ms. Ros-Lehtinen; Mr. Rohrabacher; Mr. Chabot; Mr. 
Wilson of South Carolina; Mr. McCaul; Mr. Poe of Texas; 
Mr. Salmon; Mr. Issa; Mr. Marino; Mr. Duncan of South 
Carolina; Mr. Brooks of Alabama; Mr. Cook; Mr. Weber of 
Texas; Mr. Perry; Mr. DeSantis; Mr. Meadows; Mr. Yoho; 
Mr. Clawson of Florida; Mr. DesJarlais; Mr. Ribble; Mr. 
Trott; Mr. Zeldin; and Mr. Emmer of Minnesota. 
COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Smith of 
Texas; Mr. King of New York; Mr. Rogers of Alabama; Mrs.
HR 440 IH
‘‘(7) CORPORATIONS
PERMITTED
AS
SHARE-
HOLDERS IN CERTAIN CASES.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (b)(1)(B)
and (b)(2)(A) shall not apply to a shareholder
which is a corporation if each shareholder of
such corporation is of a type permitted (without
regard to this paragraph) to be a shareholder of
an S corporation.
‘‘(B) 
CORPORATION’S
SHAREHOLDERS
COUNTED.—The shareholders of each corporate
shareholder of a corporation (and not such cor-
porate shareholder) shall be counted in deter-
mining whether such corporation meets the re-
quirement of subsection (b)(1)(A).’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TRUSTS ALLOWED TO BE SHAREHOLD-
ERS OF SUBCHAPTER S CORPORATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 1361 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special
rule for qualified subchapter S trust) is amended by redes-
ignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) and by inserting
after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph:
H. Res. 299 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
June 4, 2015. 
Whereas Joseph Robinette ‘‘Beau’’ Biden, III, born in Wil-
mington, Delaware and a graduate of the University of 
Pennsylvania and Syracuse University law school, served 
our country as an attorney in the Department of Justice 
for seven years, including assisting the nation of Kosovo 
in rebuilding their criminal justice system; 
Whereas Beau Biden served his beloved State of Delaware for 
eight years as Attorney General; 
Whereas Beau Biden joined the Army in 2003 at the age of 
34, rose to the rank of major in the Delaware Army Na-
tional Guard’s Judge Advocate General Corps, deployed 
to Iraq in 2008 and received the Bronze Star for his 
service; 
Whereas Beau Biden leaves behind a beloved wife, Hallie, 
and two children, Natalie and Hunter; and 
Whereas Beau Biden was the eldest son of the former Sen-
ator from Delaware and current Vice President of the 
United States and President of the United States Senate, 
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.: Now, therefore, be it
HR 440 IH
‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL TRUSTS INCLUDED AS SUB-
CHAPTER
S
TRUSTS.—For purposes of this sub-
section, the term ‘qualified subchapter S trust’ also
means a trust—
‘‘(A) all of the income beneficiaries of
which are individuals who are citizens or resi-
dents of the United States,
‘‘(B) all of the income (within the meaning
of section 643(b)) of which is distributed (or re-
quired to be distributed) not less frequently
than annually to 1 or more of such individuals,
and
‘‘(C) an election is in effect under para-
graph (2) for each of such individuals with re-
spect to each corporation the stock of which is
held by the trust.’’
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
•HRES 299 EH 
Resolved, That the House of Representatives has heard 
with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of 
the untimely death of Joseph Robinette Biden, III. 
Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
communicate this resolution to the Senate and transmit a 
copy thereof to the family of the Vice President of the United 
States. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
I
105TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4410
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to protect consumers from certain
unreasonable practices of credit cards issuers which result in cancellation
of credit, higher fees or rates of interest, or other penalties that result
in higher or unnecessary costs to card holders who pay credit card
balances in full, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AUGUST 5, 1998
Mr. LAFALCE (for himself, Mr. YATES, and Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Banking and Financial Services
A BILL
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to protect consumers
from certain unreasonable practices of credit cards
issuers which result in cancellation of credit, higher fees
or rates of interest, or other penalties that result in
higher or unnecessary costs to card holders who pay
credit card balances in full, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Card On-Time
Payment Protection Act of 1998’’.
HR 4410 IH
SEC. 2. PENALTIES FOR ON-TIME PAYMENT PROHIBITED.
Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C.
1637) is amended by inserting at the end thereof the fol-
lowing new subsection:
‘‘(h) PENALTIES FOR ON-TIME PAYMENT PROHIB-
ITED.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any credit
card account under an open-end consumer credit
plan, no creditor may cancel an account, impose a
minimum finance charge for any period (including
any annual period), impose any fee in lieu of a mini-
mum finance charge or impose any other charge or
penalty with regard to such account or credit ex-
tended under such account solely on the basis that
any credit extended has been repaid in full before
the end of any grace period applicable with respect
to the extension of credit.
‘‘(2) PAYMENT DUE DATES.—For purposes of
paragraph (1), a creditor shall be deemed to have
imposed a prohibited charge or penalty on an ac-
count under an open end consumer credit plan if the
creditor regularly transmits to the obligor of such
plan a statement for a billing cycle in which credit
has been extended under such plan that includes a
payment due date as required by subsection (b)(9)
of this section—