936 
HR 1960 PCS
(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will 
not be realized during fiscal year 2014; and 
(2) any effects caused by such unrealized 
planned efficiencies to the programs funded under 
the directed stockpile work and nuclear programs ac-
counts. 
(c) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) 
shall not— 
(1) apply to funds authorized to be appro-
priated for directed stockpile work, nuclear pro-
grams, or Naval Reactors; or 
(2) affect the authority of the Secretary under 
sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic En-
ergy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 
2751). 
(d) PLANNED EFFICIENCIES DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, 
the 
term 
‘‘planned 
efficiencies’’ 
means 
the 
$106,800,000, with respect to directed stockpile work, and 
$32,700,000, with respect to nuclear programs, that the 
Administrator plans to save during fiscal year 2014 
through management efficiency and workforce restruc-
turing reductions, as described in the budget request for 
fiscal year 2014 that the President submitted to Congress 
under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00936
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
937 
HR 1960 PCS
SEC. 3117. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 
the Office of the Administrator, not more than 75 percent 
may be obligated or expended until— 
(1) the President transmits to Congress the 
matters required to be transmitted during 2013 and 
2014 under section 4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(f)(2)); 
(2) the President transmits to the congressional 
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign 
Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters 
required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 
under section 1043 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1576) with respect to such matters for 
which the Secretary of Energy is responsible; 
(3) the Administrator for Nuclear Security sub-
mits to the congressional defense committees, the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and 
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
Representatives the reports required to be submitted 
during 2013 and 2014 under section 3122(b)(1) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00937
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
938 
HR 1960 PCS
Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); 
and 
(4) the Administrator submits to the congres-
sional defense committees— 
(A) the detailed report on the stockpile 
stewardship, management, and infrastructure 
plan required to be submitted during 2013 
under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the 
Atomic 
Energy 
Defense 
Act 
(50 
U.S.C. 
2523(b)(2)); and 
(B) the summary of the plan required to 
be submitted during 2014 under paragraph (1) 
of such section. 
SEC. 3118. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that, particularly in the current constrained budget 
environment, the National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion should— 
(1) prioritize its primary mission of sustaining 
and modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile; and 
(2) shift funding from secondary missions if re-
quired to ensure critical nuclear weapons moderniza-
tion programs stay on schedule and deliver nuclear 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00938
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
939 
HR 1960 PCS
warheads needed to support the military require-
ments of the United States. 
(b) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be ap-
propriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fis-
cal year 2014 for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative 
of the National Nuclear Security Administration, not more 
than 80 percent may be obligated or expended unless, by 
not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security cer-
tifies to the congressional defense committees that the 
B61 life extension program will deliver a first production 
unit in fiscal year 2019. 
(c) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (b) 
shall not affect the authority of the Secretary under Sec-
tion 4702 of the AEDA (50 U.S.C. 2742). 
SEC. 3119. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY 
TECHNOLOGY, ANALYSIS, TESTING, AND RE-
SPONSE. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Administrator for Nu-
clear Security shall establish within the nuclear security 
enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic 
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) a Center for Se-
curity Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response. 
(b) DUTIES.—The center established under sub-
section (a) shall carry out the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00939
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
940 
HR 1960 PCS
(1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of 
Defense Nuclear Security, and the management and 
operating contractors of the nuclear security enter-
prise a wide range of objective expertise on security 
technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and response 
forces. 
(2) Assist the Administrator in developing 
standards, requirements, analysis methods, and test-
ing criteria with respect to security. 
(3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons 
learned with respect to security. 
(4) Support inspections and oversight activities 
with respect to security. 
(5) Promote professional development and 
training for security professionals. 
(6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement 
for security-related acquisitions that affect multiple 
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. 
(7) Advocate for continual improvement and se-
curity excellence throughout the nuclear security en-
terprise. 
SEC. 3120. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF 
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS. 
(a) BID PROTEST.—Subsection (a) of section 3121 
of the National Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00940
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
941 
HR 1960 PCS
(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended by in-
serting ‘‘or the date on which a protest with respect to 
such a contract is resolved’’ before the period at the end. 
(b) EXPECTED COST SAVINGS.—Subsection (b)(1) of 
such section is amended by inserting ‘‘, including a de-
scription of the assumptions used and analysis conducted 
to determine such expected cost savings’’ before the semi-
colon. 
(c) NAVAL REACTORS.—Subsection (d) of such sec-
tion is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(3) NAVAL REACTORS.—The requirement for 
reports under subsection (a) shall not apply with re-
spect to a management and operations contract for 
a Naval Reactor facility.’’. 
SEC. 3121. W88–1 WARHEAD AND W78–1 WARHEAD LIFE EX-
TENSION OPTIONS. 
In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of the 
Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the 
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting 
through the Nuclear Weapons Council established by sec-
tion 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall include dur-
ing such phases a full analysis of feasibility, design defini-
tion, and cost estimation for each of the following life ex-
tension options: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00941
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
942 
HR 1960 PCS
(1) A separate life extension option to produce 
a W78–1 warhead. 
(2) A separate life extension option to produce 
a W88–1 warhead. 
(3) An interoperable W78/88–1 life extension 
option. 
(4) Any other option that the Nuclear Weapons 
Council considers appropriate. 
SEC. 3122. EXTENSION OF PRINCIPLES OF PILOT PROGRAM 
TO ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OF THE NU-
CLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) In April 2006, the Administrator for Nu-
clear Security initiated a pilot program to improve 
and streamline oversight of the Kansas City Plant of 
the National Nuclear Security Administration. 
(2) In a memorandum initiating the pilot, the 
Administrator cited slow progress in implementing 
previous efforts to streamline such oversight, saying 
that such slow progress ‘‘is a reflection of excessive 
risk aversion’’. 
(3) The pilot program shifted away from reli-
ance on directives of the Department of Energy and 
toward third-party certification and industrial stand-
ards whenever possible—but the pilot program spe-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00942
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
943 
HR 1960 PCS
cifically exempted certain high-hazard operations 
from its scope. 
(4) An independent assessment conducted one 
year after initiation of the pilot found approximately 
$14,000,000 had been saved in fiscal year 2007 be-
cause of the pilot program. 
(5) The independent assessment found that 
‘‘the replacement of Department of Energy prescrip-
tive requirements with site specific standards and 
operating systems was observed to be a significant 
cost reduction driver * * * in several business areas, 
this reduction was accomplished by moving toward 
the use of metrics and benchmarks rather than 
transactional oversight.’’. 
(6) The independent assessment further found 
that ‘‘no immediate or negative impacts were ob-
served as a result’’ of the pilot program and that 
‘‘the lessons learned at [the Kansas City Plant] can 
and should be applied at other NNSA and DOE 
sites’’, while acknowledging that application of such 
lessons would be limited by the presence of high- 
risk, high-hazard activities at such locations. 
(7) The independent assessment concluded, ‘‘it 
is our opinion that these elements can be encouraged 
and developed over time at each NNSA facility, sub-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00943
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
944 
HR 1960 PCS
ject to the limitations made necessary by the nature 
of the site.’’. 
(b) EXTENSION OF POLICIES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by para-
graph (2), the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
shall— 
(A) ensure that the principles of the pilot 
program are permanently implemented at the 
Kansas City Plant of the National Nuclear Se-
curity Administration; and 
(B) in accordance with paragraph (3), ex-
tend such principles of the pilot program, with 
modifications as the Administrator determines 
appropriate, to not less than two additional fa-
cilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as de-
fined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)), with such 
principles commencing at each facility not later 
than one year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(2) EXEMPTION.—In carrying out the extension 
of the principles of the pilot program pursuant to 
subparagraph (A) and (B) of paragraph (1), the Ad-
ministrator— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00944
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
945 
HR 1960 PCS
(A) may exempt high-hazard or high-risk 
activities from such extension; 
(B) shall exempt nuclear operations from 
such extension; and 
(C) shall focus the initial extension of such 
principles on low-risk, high-reward initiatives. 
(3) IMPLEMENTATION.— 
(A) In extending the principles of the pilot 
program to not less than two facilities under 
paragraph (1)(B), the Administrator shall cer-
tify to the appropriate congressional committees 
that— 
(i) the management and operating 
contractor for such a facility has suffi-
ciently mature processes, as well as high 
performance, to enable the extension with-
out undue risk; and 
(ii) Federal oversight mechanisms are 
in place and sufficiently mature to enable 
the extension without undue risk. 
(B) If the Administrator cannot make a 
certification under subparagraph (A) with re-
spect to a facility— 
(i) the Administrator shall delay the 
extension of the principles of the pilot pro-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00945
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
946 
HR 1960 PCS
gram to such facility until the date on 
which the Administrator makes such cer-
tification; and 
(ii) not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Ad-
ministrator shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a report regard-
ing— 
(I) the improvements to proc-
esses, procedures, and performance 
that are required to make such certifi-
cation; 
(II) a plan with respect to the ac-
tivities that the Administrator will 
carry out to make such improvements; 
and 
(III) the date by which the Ad-
ministrator expects to make such cer-
tification and extend the principles of 
the pilot program. 
(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
(A) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional 
committees’’ means the following: 
(i) The congressional defense commit-
tees. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:02 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00946
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1960.PCS
H1960
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS