152
and use restrictions relating to industrial use pur-
poses are extinguished.
(2) AFFECTED DEEDS.—The deeds with the fol-
lowing county auditor’s file numbers are referred to
in paragraph (1):
(A) Auditor’s Instrument No. 399218 of
Nez Perce County, Idaho—2.07 acres.
(B) Auditor’s Instrument No. 487437 of
Nez Perce County, Idaho—7.32 acres.
(b) OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, CUMBERLAND
RIVER, TENNESSEE.—
(1) RELEASE
OF
RETAINED
RIGHTS, INTER-
ESTS, RESERVATIONS.—With respect to land con-
veyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee Society of
Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (now
known as ‘‘Easter Seals Tennessee’’), at Old Hick-
ory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee,
under section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1965
(79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary interests and the
use restrictions relating to recreation and camping
purposes are extinguished.
(2) INSTRUMENT
OF
RELEASE.—As soon as
possible after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall execute and file in the appropriate
office a deed of release, amended deed, or other ap-
153
propriate instrument effectuating the release of in-
terests required by paragraph (1).
(c) NO EFFECT OF OTHER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this
section affects the remaining rights and interests of the
Corps of Engineers for authorized project purposes.
SEC. 3103. LAND EXCHANGE, DISPOSAL AND ACQUISITION
OF LANDS, ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.
(a) LAND EXCHANGE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may exchange
lands above 863 feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake,
Georgia, identified in the Real Estate Design Memo-
randum prepared by the Mobile district engineer,
April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for
lands on the north side of Allatoona Lake that are
needed for wildlife management and for protection
of the water quality and overall environment of
Allatoona Lake.
(2) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The basis for all
land exchanges under this subsection shall be a fair
market appraisal so that lands exchanged are of
equal value.
(b) 
DISPOSAL
AND
ACQUISITION
OF
LANDS,
ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may also sell
lands above 863 feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake,
154
Georgia, identified in the memorandum referred to
in subsection (a)(1) and may use the proceeds to
pay costs associated with the purchase of lands
needed for wildlife management and for protection
of the water quality and overall environment of
Allatoona Lake.
(2) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Land sales and
purchases to be conducted under this subsection
shall be subject to the following terms and condi-
tions:
(A) Lands acquired under this subsection
shall be by negotiated purchase from willing
sellers only.
(B) The basis for all transactions under
the program shall be a fair market appraisal
acceptable to the Secretary.
(C) The purchasers shall share in the asso-
ciated environmental and real estate costs, to
include surveys and associated fees in accord-
ance with the memorandum referred to in sub-
section (a)(1).
(D) Any other conditions that the Sec-
retary may impose.
(c) REPEAL.—Section 325 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.
155
TITLE IV—STUDIES
SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.
Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1999 (113 Stat. 330–332) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
‘‘(g) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR STUDY.—The
non-Federal interest may provide up to 100 percent of the
non-Federal share required under subsection (f) in the
form of services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind con-
tributions.’’.
SEC. 4002. CHOCTAWHATCHEE, PEA, AND YELLOW RIVERS
WATERSHED, ALABAMA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage re-
duction, environmental restoration, recreation, and water
supply in the Choctawhatchee, Pea, and Yellow Rivers wa-
tershed, Alabama.
SEC. 4003. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.
The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a
study to determine the feasibility of providing navigation
improvements at St. George, Alaska.
SEC. 4004. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for hydropower, recre-
ation, and related purposes on the Susitna River, Alaska.
156
SEC. 4005. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply
source for Searcy County, Arkansas.
SEC. 4006. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WA-
TERWAY, ILLINOIS, IOWA, MINNESOTA, MIS-
SOURI, AND WISCONSIN.
The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on
the results of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Wa-
terway Restructured System Navigation Feasibility Study,
Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, no
later than July 1, 2004.
SEC. 4007. HAMILTON, CALIFORNIA.
The Secretary is directed to continue planning,
preconstruction, engineering, and design efforts on the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins Comprehensive
Study-Hamilton City Flood Damage Reduction and Eco-
system Restoration Initial Project and shall include in the
study an area 2 miles north and 4 miles south of State
Highway 32.
SEC. 4008. NAPA RIVER, ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study
of the Napa River in the vicinity of St. Helena, California,
for the purposes of improving flood management through
reconnecting the river to its floodplain; restoring habitat,
including riparian and aquatic habitat; improving fish pas-
157
sage and water quality; and restoring native plant commu-
nities. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall review
plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and
shall incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal
study where the Secretary determines that such plans and
designs are consistent with the Federal interest.
SEC. 4009. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.
Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ‘‘32
months’’ and inserting ‘‘44 months’’.
SEC. 4010. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.
The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study
to determine the feasibility of, and alternatives for, meas-
ures to protect water diversion facilities and fish protective
screen facilities in the vicinity of river mile 178 on the
Sacramento River, California.
SEC. 4011. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOA-
QUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a
study to determine the feasibility of the beneficial use of
dredged material from the San Francisco Bay in the Sac-
ramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, including the ben-
efits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the benefits
to navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restora-
158
tion, water quality, salinity control, water supply reli-
ability, and recreation.
(b) COOPERATION.—In conducting the study, the
Secretary shall cooperate with the California Department
of Water Resources and appropriate Federal and State en-
tities in developing options for the beneficial use of
dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the Sac-
ramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
(c) REVIEW.—The study shall include a review of the
feasibility of using Sherman Island as a rehandling site
for levee maintenance material, as well as for ecosystem
restoration. The review may include monitoring a pilot
project using up to 150,000 cubic yards of dredged mate-
rial and being carried out at the Sherman Island site, ex-
amining larger scale use of dredged materials from the
San Francisco Bay and Suisun Bay Channel, and ana-
lyzing the feasibility of the potential use of saline mate-
rials from the San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and
ecosystem restoration purposes.
SEC. 4012. TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of including the northern end of Tybee Island
extending from the north terminal groin to the mouth of
Lazaretto Creek as a part of the project for beach erosion
control, Tybee Island, Georgia, carried out under section
159
201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–
5).
SEC. 4013. CALUMET HARBOR, ILLINOIS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation at Cal-
umet Harbor, Illinois.
SEC. 4014. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting
‘‘Lake Michigan and’’ before ‘‘the Chicago River’’.
SEC. 4015. SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, IL-
LINOIS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for ecosystem restora-
tion at the South Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago
River, Chicago, Illinois.
SEC. 4016. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
The Secretary is authorized to complete a rehabilita-
tion evaluation report for the project for flood damage re-
duction, Paducah, Kentucky, and, if the Secretary deter-
mines 
that 
the 
project 
is 
feasible, 
proceed 
to
preconstruction engineering and design for rehabilitation
of the project.
160
SEC. 4017. BASTROP-MOREHOUSE PARISH, LOUISIANA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply,
Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, Louisiana.
SEC. 4018. WEST FELICIANA PARISH, LOUISIANA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for riverfront develop-
ment, including enhanced public access, recreation, and
environmental restoration, on the Mississippi River in
West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.
SEC. 4019. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of deepening that portion of the navigation
channel of the navigation project for Fall River Harbor,
Massachusetts and Rhode Island, authorized by section
101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731),
seaward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge,
Fall River and Somerset, Massachusetts.
SEC. 4020. CITY OF MACKINAC ISLAND, MICHIGAN.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation at the
city of Mackinac Island, Michigan.
SEC. 4021. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Ten-
161
nessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi, to
provide water supply for northeast Mississippi.
SEC. 4022. PUEBLO OF ZUNI, NEW MEXICO.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out projects for water resources de-
velopment, environmental restoration, and natural re-
sources protection for the Pueblo of Zuni, New Mexico,
under section 203 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269).
SEC. 4023. HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NEW YORK AND
NEW JERSEY.
In carrying out the study for environmental restora-
tion, Hudson-Raritan Estuary, New York and New Jer-
sey, the Secretary shall establish and utilize watershed res-
toration teams composed of estuary restoration experts
from the Corps of Engineers, the New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection, and the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey and other experts designated
by the Secretary for the purpose of developing habitat res-
toration and water quality enhancement.
SEC. 4024. SAC AND FOX NATION, OKLAHOMA.
The Secretary shall complete a water and related
land resource conservation and management plan for the
Sac and Fox Nation, Oklahoma, under section 203 of the
162
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C.
2269).
SEC. 4025. SUTHERLIN, OREGON.
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study of
water resources along Sutherlin Creek in the vicinity of
Sutherlin, Oregon, to determine the feasibility of carrying
out a project to restore and enhance aquatic resources
using a combination of structural and bioengineering tech-
niques and, if the Secretary determines that the project
is feasible, may carry out the project.
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$2,500,000.
SEC. 4026. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREGON.
The Secretary shall conduct under section 216 of the
Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) a study of the
project for navigation, Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon,
authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor
Appropriations Act of July 25, 1912 (37 Stat. 220), to
investigate measures to address dangerous and hazardous
wave and ocean conditions.
SEC. 4027. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.
(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study to
determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restora-
163
tion and fish passage improvements on rivers throughout
the State of Oregon.
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out the study, the
Secretary shall—
(1) work in coordination with the State of Or-
egon, local governments, and other Federal agencies;
and
(2) place emphasis on—
(A) fish passage and conservation and res-
toration strategies to benefit species that are
listed or proposed for listing as threatened or
endangered species under the Endangered Spe-
cies Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
(B) other watershed restoration objectives.
(c) PILOT PROGRAM.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—In conjunction with con-
ducting the study under subsection (a), the Sec-
retary may carry out pilot projects to demonstrate
the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration and fish
passages.
(2) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.—
There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000
to carry out this subsection.
164
SEC. 4028. NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AQUATIC ECO-
SYSTEM RESTORATION AND PROTECTION.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration
and protection projects in the counties of Lackawanna,
Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, Wayne, Sul-
livan, Bradford, Northumberland, Union, Snyder, and
Montour, Pennsylvania, particularly as related to aban-
doned mine drainage abatement and reestablishment of
stream and river channels.
SEC. 4029. GEORGETOWN AND WILLIAMSBURG COUNTIES,
SOUTH CAROLINA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for
Georgetown and Williamsburg Counties, South Carolina,
including the viability and practicality of constructing a
desalinization water treatment facility to meet such water
supply needs.
SEC. 4030. SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TEXAS.
In conducting a feasibility study for shore protection
and related improvements between Sabine Pass and the
entrance to Galveston Bay, Texas, the Secretary may in-
clude any benefits related to the use of State Highway
87 as an emergency evacuation route in the determination
of national economic development benefits of the project.
165
SEC. 4031. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for
Grand County and the city of Moab, Utah, including a
review of the impact of current and future demands on
the Spanish Valley Aquifer.
SEC. 4032. CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WASHINGTON.
The Secretary shall conduct a river basin study for
the Chehalis River basin, Washington, including a study
of the uses of the basin’s water resources to assist users
in developing a fair and equitable distribution of such re-
sources.
SEC. 4033. SPRAGUE, LINCOLN COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
The Secretary may accept from the non-Federal in-
terest to pay all or a part of the non-Federal share of
the cost of feasibility study for the project for flood control
in the vicinity of Sprague, Lincoln County, Washington,
funds made available under any other Federal program
if such use of the funds is permitted under the Federal
program.
SEC. 4034. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST
VIRGINIA.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration
and protection projects in the watersheds of the
Monongahela River basin lying within the counties of
166
Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood,
Doddridge, 
Monongalia, 
Marion, 
Harrison, 
Taylor,
Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer,
Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia, particularly as re-
lated to abandoned mine drainage abatement.
SEC. 4035. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage re-
duction and environmental restoration, Menomonee River
and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
SEC. 4036. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL
SITES.
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
nature and frequency of avian botulism problems in the
vicinity of Lake Erie associated with dredged material dis-
posal sites and shall make recommendations to eliminate
the conditions that result in such problems.
TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS
PROVISIONS
SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon request of a non-Federal in-
terest, the Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance
of the following navigation channels and breakwaters con-
structed or improved by the non-Federal interest if the
Secretary determines that such maintenance is economi-
167
cally justified and environmentally acceptable and that the
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with
applicable permits and appropriate engineering and design
standards:
(1) Pix Bayou navigation channel, Chambers
County, Texas.
(2) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Indus-
trial Park, Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
(3) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
(b) COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT.—Not later than
6 months after the date of receipt of a request from a
non-Federal interest for Federal assumption of mainte-
nance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the Secretary
shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a)
and advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary’s de-
termination.
(c) SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEXAS.—The Sec-
retary shall remove sunken vessels and debris between
miles 35 and 43 of the Channel to Orange, Sabine-Neches
Waterway, Texas, for the purpose of improving navigation
safety and reducing the risk to the public.
SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may provide tech-
nical, planning, and design assistance to non-Federal in-
terests for carrying out watershed management, restora-
168
tion, and development projects at the locations described
in subsection (d).
(b) 
SPECIFIC
MEASURES.—Assistance 
provided
under subsection (a) may be in support of non-Federal
projects for the following purposes:
(1) Management and restoration of water qual-
ity.
(2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
(3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers,
wetlands, and other waterbodies to their natural
condition as a means to control flooding, excessive
erosion, and sedimentation.
(4) Protection and restoration of watersheds,
including urban watersheds.
(5) Demonstration of technologies for non-
structural measures to reduce destructive impacts of
flooding.
(c) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—The non-Federal share
of the cost of assistance provided under subsection (a)
shall be 50 percent.
(d) PROJECT LOCATIONS.—The locations referred to
in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Spring Branch watershed, Huntsville, Ala-
bama.
(2) Tuolumne County, California.
169
(3) Cucamonga basin, Upland, California.
(4) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
(5) Those portions of the watersheds of the
Concord, Charles, Blackstone, Neponset, Taunton,
Nashua, Shawsheen, and Merrimack Rivers, Massa-
chusetts, lying within the Interstate Route 495 cor-
ridor.
(6) Jackson Brook watershed, New Jersey.
(7) Those portions of the watersheds of the
Beaver, Upper Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Alle-
gheny, 
Kiskiminetas, 
Lower 
Monongahela,
Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers
lying within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Law-
rence, and Mercer, Pennsylvania.
(8) Southampton Creek watershed, South-
ampton, Pennsylvania.
(9) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township,
Pennsylvania.
(10) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
(11) Iberville Parish, East Atchafalaya River
basin, Louisiana.
(12) Genesee River watershed, New York.
(13) Tonawanda Creek watershed, New York.
(14) Buffalo River watershed, New York.
171
(9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
(10) Candor Dam, Candor, New York.
(b) SPECIAL RULE.—The assistance provided under
subsection (a) for State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall
be for a project for rehabilitation in accordance with the
report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake Outlet,
New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines
that the project is feasible.
(c) FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.—It is the sense of
Congress that the Secretary should work to immediately
remedy the situation at Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon, due to
the rapid deterioration of the dam.
(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$6,000,000.
SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon request of a non-Federal in-
terest, the Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity
and effectiveness of a project for flood damage reduction
and, if the Secretary determines that the project does not
meet such minimum standards as the Secretary may es-
tablish and, absent action by the Secretary, the project
will fail, the Secretary may take such action as may be
necessary to restore the integrity and effectiveness of the
project.
172
(b) PRIORITY.—The Secretary shall evaluate under
subsection (a) the following projects:
(1) Project for flood damage reduction, Arkan-
sas River Levees, river mile 205 to river mile 308.4,
Arkansas.
(2) 
Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction,
Marianna Borough, Pennsylvania.
(3) 
Project 
for 
flood 
damage 
reduction,
Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee.
SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.
Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(27);
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (28) and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(29) La Crosse County, Wisconsin;
‘‘(30) Crawford County, Wisconsin;
‘‘(31) Buffalo County, Wisconsin;
‘‘(32) Calhoun County, Illinois;
‘‘(33) Saint Charles County, Missouri;
‘‘(34) Saint Louis County, Missouri;
‘‘(35) Dubuque County, Iowa;
173
‘‘(36) Scott County, Iowa;
‘‘(37) Rock Island County, Illinois;
‘‘(38) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
‘‘(39) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
‘‘(40) Iberville Parish, Louisiana; and
‘‘(41) Livingston Parish, Louisiana.’’.
SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED
PROJECTS.
Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat.
334) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph
(7);
(2) by striking the period at the end of para-
graph (8) and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(9) $20,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(20);
‘‘(10) $25,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(23);
‘‘(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(25);
‘‘(12) $15,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(26);
174
‘‘(13) $7,800,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(27);
‘‘(14) $18,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(31); and
‘‘(15) $30,000,000 for the project described in
subsection (c)(40).’’.
SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND
CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.
The Secretary shall expedite completion of the re-
ports and, if the Secretary determines the project is fea-
sible, shall expedite completion of construction for the fol-
lowing projects:
(1) Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County,
Maryland, being carried out under section 535(a) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113
Stat. 348–349).
(2) West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland,
being carried out under section 521 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114. Stat.
2655).
(3) Sylvan Beach Breakwater, Verona, Oneida
County, New York, being carried out under section
3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of
175
publicly owned property’’, approved August 13, 1946
(33 U.S.C. 426g).
(4) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New
York, being carried out under section 205 of the
Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
(5) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New
York, being carried out under section 205 of the
Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
(6) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York,
being carried out under section 205 of the Flood
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
(7) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome,
New York, being carried out under section 206 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
U.S.C. 2330).
(8) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney
Point, New York, being carried out under section
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
(9) Newton Creek, Bainbridge, New York,
being carried out under section 14 of the Flood Con-
trol Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r).
(10) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New
York, being carried out under section 206 of the