792 
trajectories of missiles from both the North and South 
Poles; and 
(3) addresses technical capability and policy 
with respect to such options. 
SEC. 1665. TESTING OF REDESIGNED KILL VEHICLE PRIOR 
TO PRODUCTION. 
(a) SUCCESSFUL TESTING REQUIRED.—Except as 
provided by subsection (b), the Director of the Missile De-
fense Agency may not make a lot production decision for 
the redesigned kill vehicle unless the vehicle has undergone 
at least one successful flight intercept test that meets the 
following criteria: 
(1) The test sufficiently assesses the performance 
of the vehicle in order to inform a lot production deci-
sion. 
(2) The results of the test demonstrate that the 
vehicle— 
(A) will work in an effective manner; and 
(B) has the ability to accomplish the in-
tended mission of the vehicle. 
(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense, without dele-
gation, may waive subsection (a) if— 
(1) the Secretary determines that the waiver is 
in the interest of national security; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00792
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
793 
(2) the Secretary determines that the threat of 
missiles is advancing at a pace that requires addi-
tional capacity of the ground-based midcourse system 
by 2023; 
(3) the Secretary determines that the waiver is 
appropriate in light of the assessment conducted by 
the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation 
under subsection (c); 
(4) the Secretary submits to the congressional de-
fense committees a report containing— 
(A) a notice of the waiver, including the ra-
tionale of the Secretary for making the waiver; 
(B) a certification by the Secretary that the 
Secretary has analyzed and accepts the risk of 
making and implementing a lot production deci-
sion for the redesigned kill vehicle prior to the 
vehicle undergoing a successful flight intercept 
test; and 
(C) the assessment of the Director of Oper-
ational Test and Evaluation under subsection 
(c); and 
(5) a period of 30 days elapses following the date 
on which the Secretary submits the report under 
paragraph (4). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00793
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
794 
(c) ASSESSMENT ON RISKS.—The Director of Oper-
ational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the Secretary 
of Defense an assessment on the risks of making a lot pro-
duction decision for the redesigned kill vehicle prior to the 
vehicle undergoing a successful flight intercept test. 
SEC. 1666. REQUIREMENTS FOR BALLISTIC MISSILE DE-
FENSE CAPABLE SHIPS. 
(a) FORCE STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary 
of the Navy, in consultation with the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency, shall include in the first force structure as-
sessment conducted following the date of the enactment of 
this Act the following: 
(1) An assessment of the requirements for bal-
listic missile defense capable ships. 
(2) The force structure requirements associated 
with advanced ballistic missile defense capabilities. 
(b) FORCE STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT DEFINED.—The 
term ‘‘force structure assessment’’ has the meaning given 
the term in Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 3050.27. 
SEC. 1667. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR 
STANDARD MISSILE–3 BLOCK IB MISSILES. 
(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.— 
Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the 
Director of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into one 
or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 2019 pro-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00794
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
795 
gram year, for the procurement of standard missile–3 block 
IB missiles. 
(b) CONDITION
FOR
OUT-YEAR
CONTRACT
PAY-
MENTS.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall 
provide that any obligation of the United States to make 
a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal 
year 2019 is subject to the availability of appropriations 
or funds for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 
SEC. 1668. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
ARMY LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DE-
FENSE SENSOR. 
(a) LIMITATION.—If the Secretary of the Army issues 
an acquisition strategy for a 360-degree lower tier air and 
missile defense sensor pursuant to section 1679(a) of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub-
lic Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1774) that proposes such sensor 
achieve initial operating capability later than December 31, 
2023, not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to 
be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available 
for fiscal year 2019 for such sensor may be obligated or 
expended until the date on which the Secretary submits to 
the congressional defense committees a report— 
(1) explaining the rationale of such delayed ini-
tial operating capability, including a description of 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00795
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
796 
any technological or acquisition-related factors caus-
ing such delay; and 
(2) containing a funding profile and schedule to 
ensure that such sensor would achieve initial oper-
ating capability by December 31, 2023. 
(b) PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION.—The Secretary 
shall ensure that the performance specification of the 360- 
degree lower tier air and missile defense sensor— 
(1) specifies requirements relating to— 
(A) detecting and tracking complex attacks 
from air breathing threats, tactical ballistic mis-
siles, and emerging hypersonic weapons; and 
(B) being a key component of the future in-
tegrated air and missile defense architecture of 
the Army and supporting engagements for the 
full range and capability of Patriot Advanced 
Capability–3 missile segment enhancement inter-
ceptors; and 
(2) uses evaluation criteria that enables an un-
derstanding of the cost and value of procuring such 
sensor in accordance with such specified requirements. 
SEC. 1669. MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR IN HAWAII. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00796
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
797 
of the Missile Defense Agency, and in coordination with rel-
evant Federal and local entities, should— 
(1) ensure an on-time or improved delivery 
schedule of the discrimination radar for homeland de-
fense to be made operational in Hawaii; and 
(2) accelerate the deployment of the radar as 
much as possible, contingent on the environmental re-
view process pursuant to the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
(b) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 45 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency shall certify to the congressional defense 
committees that— 
(1) the Director is on schedule to award the con-
tract for the discrimination radar for homeland de-
fense planned to be located in Hawaii by December 
31, 2018; and 
(2) such radar and associated in-flight inter-
ceptor communications system data terminal will be 
operational by not later than September 30, 2023. 
(c) BRIEFINGS.— 
(1) DELAYED SCHEDULE.—If the Director is un-
able to certify under subsection (b) that the Director 
is on schedule to award the contract for the discrimi-
nation radar for homeland defense planned to be lo-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00797
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
798 
cated in Hawaii by December 31, 2018, not later 
than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and on a biweekly basis thereafter until the date 
of the award, the Director shall provide to the Com-
mittees on Armed Services of the House of Represent-
atives and the Senate, and to any other congressional 
defense committee upon request, a briefing explain-
ing— 
(A) the rationale for the delay in such 
schedule; and 
(B) any effects of such delay in making 
such radar and associated in-flight interceptor 
communications system data terminal oper-
ational by not later than September 30, 2023. 
(2) SEMIANNUAL.—Not later than 45 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and semiannu-
ally thereafter through 2021, the Director shall pro-
vide to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
House of Representatives and the Senate, and to any 
other congressional defense committee upon request, a 
briefing on— 
(A) the acquisition of the discrimination 
radar for homeland defense planned to be located 
in Hawaii and the associated in-flight inter-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00798
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
799 
ceptor communications system data terminal; 
and 
(B) the environmental review process for 
such radar pursuant to the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.). 
SEC. 1670. REPORTS ON UNFUNDED PRIORITIES OF THE 
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY. 
(a) REPORTS.—Not later than 10 days after the date 
on which the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 
2020 and 2021 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 
1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Director of the 
Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the Secretary of De-
fense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 
to the congressional defense committees, a report on the un-
funded priorities of the Missile Defense Agency. 
(b) ELEMENTS.— 
(1) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—Each report under 
subsection (a) shall specify, for each unfunded pri-
ority covered by such report, the following: 
(A) A summary description of such pri-
ority, including the objectives to be achieved if 
such priority is funded (whether in whole or in 
part). 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00799
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
800 
(B) The additional amount of funds rec-
ommended in connection with the objectives 
under subparagraph (A). 
(C) Account information with respect to 
such priority, including, as applicable— 
(i) the line item number for applicable 
procurement accounts; 
(ii) the program element number for 
applicable research, development, test, and 
evaluation accounts; and 
(iii) the sub-activity group for applica-
ble operation and maintenance accounts. 
(2) PRIORITIZATION OF PRIORITIES.—Each re-
port under subsection (a) shall present the unfunded 
priorities covered by such report in order of urgency 
of priority. 
(c) UNFUNDED PRIORITY DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘unfunded priority’’, in the case of a fiscal year, 
means a program, activity, or mission requirement of the 
Missile Defense Agency that— 
(1) is not funded in the budget of the President 
for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant 
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code; 
(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associ-
ated with an operational or contingency plan of a 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00800
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
801 
combatant command or other validated requirement; 
and 
(3) would have been recommended for funding 
through the budget referred to in paragraph (1) by the 
Director of the Missile Defense Agency in connection 
with the budget if— 
(A) additional resources had been available 
for the budget to fund the program, activity, or 
mission requirement; or 
(B) the program, activity, or mission re-
quirement has emerged since the budget was for-
mulated. 
SEC. 1671. REPORT ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Secretary of Defense is conducting a bal-
listic missile defense review that will assess the capa-
bilities and requirements for homeland, regional, and 
theater missile defense. 
(2) This review will have significant implica-
tions for national security and potentially on resource 
prioritization and requirements. 
(3) The review was initially expected to have 
been completed by January but has been delayed sev-
eral months due to revisions and has not yet been 
submitted to Congress. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00801
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
802 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
ballistic missile defense that addresses the implications for 
planned 
programs 
of 
record, 
costs 
and 
resource 
prioritization, and strategic stability. 
SEC. 1672. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE AND ROCKET 
DEFENSE 
COOPERATION 
BETWEEN 
THE 
UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The United States and Israel signed a Memo-
randum of Understanding on September 14, 2016, 
that covers the 10-year period beginning with fiscal 
year 2019. 
(2) The Memorandum of Understanding states 
that the United States will provide annual funding of 
$500,000,000 for cooperative programs to develop, 
produce, and procure missile, rocket, and projectile 
defense capabilities to help Israel meet its security 
needs and to help develop and enhance the missile de-
fense capabilities of the United States. 
(3) The Memorandum of Understanding further 
states that Israel may seek additional missile defense 
funding from the United States in exceptional cir-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00802
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
803 
cumstances, as may be jointly agreed by the United 
States and Israel. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that— 
(1) the strong and enduring relationship between 
the United States and Israel is in the national secu-
rity interest of both countries; and 
(2) the September 2016 Memorandum of Under-
standing between the United States and Israel, in-
cluding the provisions of the memorandum relating to 
missile and rocket defense cooperation, is a critical 
component of the bilateral relationship. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 1681. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION TO ASSESS THE 
THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES FROM ELEC-
TROMAGNETIC PULSE ATTACKS AND SIMILAR 
EVENTS. 
Section 1691 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1786) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (e)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘April 
1, 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘December 1, 2019’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘October 
1, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1, 2019’’; and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00803
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
804 
(2) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘October 1, 
2019’’ and inserting ‘‘the date that is 180 days after 
the date on which the Commission submits the report 
under subsection (e)(1)’’. 
SEC. 1682. PROCUREMENT OF AMMONIUM PERCHLORATE 
AND OTHER CHEMICALS FOR USE IN SOLID 
ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.— 
(1) GOVERNMENT-OWNED, CONTRACTOR
OPER-
ATED.—The Secretary of the Army and the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and 
Industrial Base Policy shall jointly conduct a busi-
ness case analysis of the Federal Government using a 
Government-owned, contractor-operated model to en-
sure a robust domestic industrial base to supply spe-
cialty chemicals, including ammonium perchlorate, 
for use in solid rocket motors. Such analysis shall in-
clude assessments of the near- and long-term costs, op-
erating and sustainment costs, program impacts, op-
portunities for competition, opportunities for redun-
dant or complementary capabilities, and national se-
curity implications of using such a model. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2019, the 
Secretary and the Deputy Assistant Secretary shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00804
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
805 
business case analysis conducted under paragraph 
(1). 
(b) FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.— 
(1) USE.—To the extent practicable, in award-
ing a contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate 
from retired solid rocket motors, the Secretary of De-
fense shall use full and open competition (as defined 
in section 107 of title 41, United States Code). 
(2) NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary awards a 
contract for the sale of ammonium perchlorate from 
retired solid rocket motors using procedures that do 
not include full and open competition, the Secretary 
shall notify the congressional defense committees of 
such award not later than 30 days after the date of 
such award. 
SEC. 
1683. 
CONVENTIONAL 
PROMPT 
GLOBAL 
STRIKE 
HYPERSONIC CAPABILITIES. 
(a) VALIDATED REQUIREMENTS.—Not later than No-
vember 30, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a validated require-
ment for ground-, sea-, or air-launched (or a combination 
thereof) conventional prompt global strike hypersonic capa-
bilities. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2019, the 
Under 
Secretary 
of 
Defense 
for 
Acquisition 
and 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00805
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
806 
Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretary of the 
Navy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report that 
contains the following: 
(1) A plan to deliver a conventional prompt 
global strike weapon system that— 
(A) is in accordance with section 1693 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 
1791); and 
(B) includes— 
(i) options with cost estimates for ac-
celerating the initial capability for such 
system; and 
(ii) a description of policy decisions by 
the Secretary of Defense that are necessary 
to employ hypersonic offense capabilities 
from each potential launch platform of such 
system. 
(2) Details with respect to the assessed level of 
ambiguity and misinterpretation risk relating to the 
conventional prompt global strike weapon system, in-
cluding such potential risks associated with warhead 
ambiguity, platform ambiguity (including if adver-
sary sensors are degraded), perceptions of the surviv-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00806
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
807 
ability of strategic nuclear forces, and likely adver-
sary responses. 
(3) A description of whether, when, and how the 
Under Secretary would address the risks identified 
under paragraph (2) in developing and deploying the 
conventional prompt global strike weapon system and 
in developing the concept of operations for such sys-
tem. 
SEC. 1684. REPORT REGARDING INDUSTRIAL BASE FOR 
LARGE SOLID ROCKET MOTORS. 
(a) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 15, 2019, 
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment, in consultation with the Secretaries of 
the military departments that the Under Secretary 
determines appropriate, shall submit to the appro-
priate congressional committees a report on whether, 
and if so, how, the Federal Government will sustain 
more than one supplier for large solid rocket motors. 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The report under 
paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the fol-
lowing: 
(A) The risks within the industrial base for 
large solid rocket motors, including the risks to 
national security. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00807
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
808 
(B) The near- and long-term costs associ-
ated with having a single source of large solid 
rocket motors as compared to having more than 
one such source. 
(C) Options for sustaining more than one 
supplier for large solid rocket motors, including 
through leveraging— 
(i) the ground-based strategic deterrent 
program; 
(ii) the Trident II D5 fleet ballistic 
missile program; 
(iii) the ground-based midcourse de-
fense program; 
(iv) national security space launch 
programs; 
(v) programs of the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration; and 
(vi) any other applicable programs 
that use or may use solid rocket motors of 
any size, including with respect to substra-
tegic and tactical systems. 
(b) BRIEFING.—Not later than November 30, 2018, the 
Under Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, 
and to any other appropriate congressional committee upon 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00808
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
809 
request, a briefing on the industrial base for large solid 
rocket motors. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means the following: 
(1) The congressional defense committees. 
(2) The Committee on Science, Space, and Tech-
nology and the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives. 
(3) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation and the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate. 
SEC. 1685. NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE WITH RE-
SPECT TO RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTER-
FERENCE IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES. 
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall com-
mission and produce a National Intelligence Estimate, 
which may be submitted in classified form with an unclas-
sified summary, on Russian and Chinese interference in 
democratic countries around the world, including the 
United States, that contains specific descriptions of such 
interference. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00809
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
810 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER FIVE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title 
XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, 
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program (and authorizations of appropriations there-
for) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2024. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00810
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
811 
Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated 
before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2023; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2024 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE. 
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take 
effect on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2018; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2103(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00811
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
812 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation 
Amount 
Alabama ............................
Anniston Army Depot ................................................
$5,200,000 
California ..........................
Fort Irwin ...................................................................
$29,000,000 
Colorado .............................
Fort Carson .................................................................
$77,000,000 
Georgia ..............................
Fort Gordon .................................................................
$99,000,000 
Indiana ..............................
Crane Army Ammunition Plant ...............................
$16,000,000 
Kentucky ............................
Fort Campbell .............................................................
$50,000,000 
Fort Knox ....................................................................
$26,000,000 
Maryland ...........................
Fort Meade ..................................................................
$16,500,000 
New Jersey ........................
Picatinny Arsenal .......................................................
$41,000,000 
New Mexico .......................
White Sands Missile Range .......................................
$40,000,000 
New York ...........................
U.S. Military Academy ..............................................
$160,000,000 
North Carolina ..................
Fort Bragg ...................................................................
$10,000,000 
South Carolina .................
Fort Jackson ................................................................
$52,000,000 
Texas ..................................
Fort Bliss .....................................................................
$24,000,000 
Fort Hood ....................................................................
$9,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2103(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out the military con-
struction project for the installations or locations outside 
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation 
Amount 
Germany ...........................
East Camp Grafenwoehr .............................................
$31,000,000 
Honduras ...........................
Soto Cano Air Base .....................................................
$21,000,000 
Korea ..................................
Camp Tango .................................................................
$17,500,000 
Kuwait ...............................
Camp Arifjan ...............................................................
$44,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00812
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
813 
propriations in section 2103(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
State/Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Italy ............................
Vicenza .......................
Family Housing New 
Construction ..........
$95,134,000 
Korea ..........................
Camp Walker .............
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction .................
$68,000,000 
Puerto Rico ................
Fort Buchanan ..........
Family Housing Re-
placement Con-
struction .................
$26,000,000 
Wisconsin ...................
Fort McCoy ................
Family Housing New 
Construction ..........
$6,200,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2103(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $18,326,000. 
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00813
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
814 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Army as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2101 of that Act (128 Stat. 3670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2020, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...................
Military Ocean Ter-
minal, Concord.
Access Control Point
$9,900,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00814
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
815 
Army: Extension of 2015 Project Authorization—Continued 
State/Country 
Installation 
Project 
Amount 
Japan .........................
Kadena Air Base .......
Missile Magazine .......
$10,600,000 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .........................
Camp Navajo .....................................................
$14,800,000 
California .....................
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton ..............
$127,930,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar ...............
$31,980,000 
Naval Air Station Lemoore ..............................
$127,590,000 
Naval Base Coronado ........................................
$156,580,000 
Naval Base San Diego ......................................
$176,040,000 
Naval Base Ventura ..........................................
$53,160,000 
Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach ................
$139,630,000 
District of Columbia ...
Naval Observatory .............................................
$115,600,000 
Florida .........................
Naval Air Station Whiting Field ....................
$10,000,000 
Naval Station Mayport ....................................
$111,460,000 
Georgia .........................
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany ..............
$31,900,000 
Guam ............................
Joint Region Marianas .....................................
$355,257,000 
Hawaii .........................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ...................
$123,320,000 
Marine Corps Base Hawaii .............................
$66,100,000 
Maine ...........................
Portsmouth Naval Yard ....................................
$149,685,000 
Mississippi ...................
Naval Construction Battalion Center ..............
$22,300,000 
North Carolina ............
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune ..................
$51,300,000 
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point ........
$240,830,000 
Pennsylvania ...............
Naval Support Activity Philadelphia .............
$71,050,000 
South Carolina ............
Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort ................
$15,817,000 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island ...
$35,190,000 
Utah .............................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................................
$105,520,000 
Virginia ........................
Marine Corps Base Quantico ...........................
$13,100,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00815
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
816 
Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Norfolk Naval Shipyard ...................................
$26,120,000 
Washington ..................
Naval Base Kitsap ............................................
$88,960,000 
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island ..................
$27,380,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installation or location outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahamas ......................
Andros Island ....................................................
$31,050,000 
Bahrain ......................
SW Asia .............................................................
$26,340,000 
Cuba .............................
Naval Station Guantanamo Bay .....................
$104,700,000 
Germany ......................
Panzer Kaserne .................................................
$43,950,000 
Japan ...........................
Kadena Air Base ...............................................
$9,049,000 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a) and available for military 
family housing functions as specified in the funding table 
in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition 
and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00816
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
817 
in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 
the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation 
Units 
Amount 
Guam ..........................
Joint Region Mari-
anas ........................
Replace Andersen 
Housing PH III ....
$83,441,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in 
section 2204(a) and available for military family housing 
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $4,502,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available 
for military family housing functions as specified in the 
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy 
may improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $16,638,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00817
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
818 
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00818
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
819 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska ........................................
Eielson Air Force Base .................
$63,800,000 
Arizona ......................................
Davis Monthan Air Force Base ....
$15,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .....................
$40,000,000 
Arkansas ....................................
Little Rock Air Force Base ...........
$26,000,000 
Florida .......................................
Eglin Air Force Base ....................
$62,863,000 
MacDill Air Force Base ................
$3,100,000 
Patrick Air Force Base .................
$9,000,000 
Guam .........................................
Joint Region Marianas .................
$9,800,000 
Louisiana ..................................
Barksdale Air Force Base .............
$12,250,000 
Mariana Islands .......................
Tinian ............................................
$50,700,000 
Maryland ...................................
Joint Base Andrews ......................
$58,000,000 
Massachusetts ............................
Hanscom Air Force Base ..............
$225,000,000 
Nebraska ....................................
Offutt Air Force Base ....................
$9,500,000 
Nevada .......................................
Creech Air Force Base ...................
$59,000,000 
Nellis Air Force Base ....................
$5,900,000 
New Mexico ................................
Holloman Air Force Base .............
$85,000,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ...............
$7,000,000 
New York ...................................
Rome Lab .......................................
$14,200,000 
North Dakota .............................
Minot Air Force Base ....................
$66,000,000 
Ohio ............................................
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
$182,000,000 
Oklahoma ...................................
Altus Air Force Base .....................
$12,000,000 
Tinker Air Force Base ..................
$166,000,000 
South Carolina ..........................
Shaw Air Force Base ....................
$53,000,000 
Utah ...........................................
Hill Air Force Base .......................
$26,000,000 
Washington ................................
Fairchild-White Bluff ....................
$14,000,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military 
construction projects for the installation or location outside 
the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the fol-
lowing table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
United Kingdom ..........................
Royal Air Force Lakenheath ......
$148,467,000 
Worldwide Classified ...................
Classified Location ......................
$18,000,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00819
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
822 
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 
114-328; 130 Stat. 2696) for Joint Base San Antonio, 
Texas, for construction of a basic military training recruit 
dormitory, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 
a 26,537 square meter dormitory in the amount of 
$92,300,000. 
SEC. 2307. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 
115-91; 131 Stat. 1825) for the United States Air Force 
Academy, Colorado, for construction of a cyberworks facil-
ity, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a facility 
of up to 4,000 square meters. 
SEC. 2308. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROJECTS. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may carry out military construction projects to 
construct— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00822
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
823 
(1) a 6,702 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Cali-
fornia, in the amount of $43,000,000; 
(2) a 4,833 square meter Cyberspace Test Facil-
ity at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in the amount 
of $38,000,000; and 
(3) a 4,735 square meter Joint Simulation Envi-
ronment Facility at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 
in the amount of $30,000,000. 
(b) USE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 
EVALUATION FUNDS.—As provided for in the Defense Lab-
oratory Modernization Pilot Program authorized by section 
2803 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), the Secretary may 
use funds available for research, development, test, and eval-
uation for the projects described in subsection (a). 
SEC. 
2309. 
ADDITIONAL 
AUTHORITY 
TO 
CARRY 
OUT 
PROJECT AT TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, CALI-
FORNIA, IN FISCAL YEAR 2019. 
The Secretary of the Air Force may carry out a mili-
tary construction project to construct a 150,000 square foot 
high-bay air cargo pallet storage and marshaling enclosure 
integral to installation of a mechanized material handling 
system at Travis Air Force Base, California, in the amount 
of $35,000,000. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00823
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
824 
TITLE 
XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGEN-
CIES 
MILITARY 
CONSTRUC-
TION 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(a) and available for military construction 
projects inside the United States as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .............................................
Clear Air Force Station ..............................
$174,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson .............
$14,000,000 
Arkansas .........................................
Little Rock Air Force Base .........................
$14,000,000 
California .......................................
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton .........
$12,596,000 
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ..............
$18,800,000 
Naval Base Coronado ..................................
$71,088,000 
Colorado ..........................................
Fort Carson ..................................................
$24,297,000 
Conus Classified .............................
Classified Location .......................................
$49,222,000 
Kentucky .........................................
Fort Campbell ..............................................
$82,298,000 
Maine ..............................................
Kittery ..........................................................
$11,600,000 
Maryland ........................................
Fort Meade ...................................................
$805,000,000 
Missouri ..........................................
St. Louis .......................................................
$447,800,000 
New Jersey ....................................
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ...........
$10,200,000 
North Carolina .............................
Fort Bragg ....................................................
$32,366,000 
Marine Corps Air Station New River ........
$32,580,000 
Oklahoma .......................................
McAlester ......................................................
$7,000,000 
Texas ...............................................
Joint Base San Antonio ..............................
$10,200,000 
Red River Army Depot ................................
$71,500,000 
Virginia ..........................................
Fort A.P. Hill ..............................................
$11,734,000 
Fort Belvoir ..................................................
$6,127,000 
Humphreys Engineer Center ......................
$20,257,000 
Joint Base Langley-Eustis ..........................
$12,700,000 
Pentagon .......................................................
$35,850,000 
Training Center Dam Neck ........................
$8,959,000 
Washington .....................................
Joint Base Lewis-McChord .........................
$26,200,000 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00824
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
825 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(a) and available for military con-
struction projects outside the United States as specified in 
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations or locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium ...........................
Chievres Air Base ........................................................
$14,305,000 
Cuba ................................
Naval Station Guantanamo Bay ...............................
$9,080,000 
Germany .........................
Baumholder ..................................................................
$11,504,000 
Kaiserslautern Air Base .............................................
$99,955,000 
Wiesbaden ....................................................................
$56,048,000 
Japan ..............................
Camp McTureous ........................................................
$94,851,000 
Iwakuni ........................................................................
$33,200,000 
Kadena Air Base .........................................................
$21,400,000 
Yokosuka .......................................................................
$170,386,000 
SEC. 
2402. 
AUTHORIZED 
ENERGY 
CONSERVATION 
PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available 
for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 
10, United States Code, in the amount set forth in the table. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00825
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
826 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years begin-
ning after September 30, 2018, for military construction, 
land acquisition, and military family housing functions of 
the Department of Defense (other than the military depart-
ments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and 
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost 
of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act 
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding 
table in section 4601. 
SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3669), 
the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2401 of that Act (128 Stat. 3681) 
and as amended by section 2406 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B 
of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1831), shall remain in 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00826
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
827 
effect until October 1, 2019, or the date of the enactment 
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2020, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2015 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Japan ...............
Commander Fleet Activi-
ties Sasebo ...................
E.J. King High School 
Replacement/Ren-
ovation .....................
$37,681,000 
Japan ...............
Okinawa ..........................
Kubasaki High School 
Replacement/Ren-
ovation .....................
$99,420,000 
New Mexico ......
Cannon AFB ...................
SOF Squadron Oper-
ations Facility 
(STS) .......................
$23,333,000 
Virginia ............
Pentagon ..........................
Redundant Chilled 
Water Loop ..............
$15,100,000 
TITLE XXV—INTERNATIONAL 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization 
Security 
Invest-
ment Program 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
20:20 May 15, 2018
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00827
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H5515.RH
H5515
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS