157 
(b) DEFINITIONS PROMULGATED BY THE WORKING 
GROUP.—Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Working Group shall— 
(1) in consultation with the Coordinator and 
bureaus and offices of the Department that are in-
volved in the planning, coordination, integration, im-
plementation, or evaluation of security assistance, 
develop and promulgate a definition of the level of 
security assistance programs, projects, or activities 
that mark a country as a recipient of ‘‘significant’’ 
security assistance to merit inclusion in the assess-
ment, monitoring, and evaluation process described 
in subsection (c); and 
(2) in consultation with the Coordinator, the 
Bureau of Democracy , Human Rights, and Labor, 
and the heads of other relevant bureaus of the De-
partment, develop and promulgate a definition of 
baseline norms for governance and the rule of law, 
including a rubric to assess whether a recipient of 
security assistance is abiding by such baseline. 
(c) ASSESSMENT, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Co-
ordinator shall develop an assessment, monitoring, 
and evaluation program to be conducted for any
158 
country receiving significant security assistance, as 
defined in accordance with subsection (b)(1). 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The program described in 
paragraph (1) shall include each of the following ele-
ments: 
(A) Baseline assessments that consider 
factors, including— 
(i) recipient country threat percep-
tions and the manner in which such per-
ceptions may inform the use of security as-
sistance; 
(ii) the recipient’s approach to govern-
ance and commitment to rule of law, in-
cluding the transparency and account-
ability of security forces, and the manner 
in which such approach is likely to be in-
fluenced by security assistance; 
(iii) the recipient’s capacity to absorb 
the security assistance given and to achieve 
the objectives of such assistance; 
(iv) the human rights record of the re-
cipient, including for purposes of section 
620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961 (22 U.S.C. 2378d) and section 362 
of title 10, United States Code, and any
159 
relevant attempts by such recipient to rem-
edy such record; 
(v) country- or region-specific oppor-
tunities and risks that could enhance or 
impair the outcomes associated with pro-
viding security assistance; and 
(vi) indicators of efficacy for security 
assistance programs, projects, and activi-
ties, for purposes of planning, monitoring, 
and evaluation. 
(B) Monitoring implementation of security 
assistance programs, projects, and activities to 
measure progress toward achieving specific tar-
gets, metrics, or indicators, as well as desired 
outcomes. 
(C) Evaluation of the efficiency and effec-
tiveness of security assistance in achieving de-
sired outcomes. 
(D) Identification of lessons learned in car-
rying out security assistance and recommenda-
tions for improving future assistance. 
(3) OVERSIGHT AND FRAMEWORK.—The Coor-
dinator shall guide and support, in coordination with 
relevant regional and functional bureaus, the assess-
160 
ment and monitoring described in paragraph (1) and 
shall create a common evaluation framework. 
(4) INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH
ENTITY.—Not 
later than 18 months after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into a 
contract with an independent research entity, such 
as a federally funded research and development cen-
ter or other non-profit entity, that demonstrates ap-
propriate expertise and analytical capability to evalu-
ate the capacity of security assistance to achieve de-
sired outcomes in accordance with the framework 
created pursuant to paragraph (3). 
(5) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 
Congress that the ability of the Department to 
measure and assess the effects of United States se-
curity assistance programs and activities on govern-
ance, rule of law, professionalism of recipient secu-
rity forces, and institutional capacity weaknesses of 
recipient security forces would benefit from the in-
creased availability of independent research and 
data. 
(d) SECURITY ASSISTANCE PLANNING.— 
(1) PRIORITIZATION.—Not later than 2 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and an-
nually thereafter, the Working Group shall develop
161 
a list of priority recipient countries to receive secu-
rity assistance, on the basis of policy objectives de-
termined by the Department, and submit such infor-
mation in accordance with subsection (f). 
(2) INCLUSION
IN
REGIONAL
AND
COUNTRY 
STRATEGIES.—Any comprehensive regional strategy, 
such as a joint regional strategy or its equivalent, 
and any country strategy, such as an integrated 
country strategy or its equivalent, that is produced 
on or after the date that is 2 years after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, and each successor 
strategy to such strategy, shall integrate security as-
sistance planning in a manner that incorporates the 
elements of the framework created pursuant to sub-
section (a) and include an annex relating to security 
assistance, which shall include— 
(A) the assessment, monitoring, and eval-
uation metrics described in subsection (c); 
(B) requests to allocate security assistance 
with respect to the area covered by the strategy; 
and 
(C) a description of the manner in which 
such resources will be used. 
(3) COORDINATION OF RESOURCES.—In devel-
oping annexes relating to security assistance for in-
162 
clusion in comprehensive regional strategies or coun-
try strategies in accordance with paragraph (2), the 
relevant bureau, office, or diplomatic post shall co-
ordinate with— 
(A) the Office; 
(B) the Office of Foreign Assistance Re-
sources, or an equivalent entity in the Depart-
ment, regarding the allocation of resources in 
line with priorities of the Department of State 
for security assistance; and 
(C) the Department of Defense and other 
Federal departments and agencies that provide 
security assistance, security cooperation, or 
other forms of foreign assistance. 
(4) SECURITY ASSISTANCE, GOVERNANCE, AND 
RULE OF LAW.—Not later than 2 years after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, any annex relat-
ing to security assistance described in paragraph (2) 
that is included in a country strategy shall include 
an assessment by the Under Secretary responsible 
for civilian security, democracy, and human rights 
whether such country abides by baseline norms for 
governance and the rule of law using the rubric pro-
mulgated in accordance with subsection (b)(2). A se-
curity assistance annex developed in accordance with
163 
paragraph (2) for a country receiving a negative de-
termination shall also include the following: 
(A) Reforms the recipient could undertake, 
where practicable, to improve governance and 
rule of law in order to create more effective se-
curity. 
(B) Conditions, which may also be included 
in the compacts described in subsection (e), 
under which the United States might— 
(i) expand or increase security assist-
ance upon verifiable progress made toward 
such reforms; and 
(ii) restrict or end security assistance 
as a result of lack of progress toward such 
reforms or further deterioration of norms 
for governance or the rule of law. 
(C) An assessment of the benefits and like-
lihood of reaching agreement with the recipient 
country to devote 1 percent of the total value 
of all security assistance to such country for 
training in-country civilian professionals on 
methods to evaluate the fiscal and functional ef-
fectiveness of the security institutions in such 
country.
164 
(D) The manner in which security assist-
ance will be used to improve governance, rule of 
law, and human rights reforms in such country. 
(E) Steps to ensure consultation with the 
national legislature and with civil society groups 
that operate in such country on the provision of 
security assistance, including for the formula-
tion of a compact in accordance with subsection 
(e)(2). 
(e) SECURITY ASSISTANCE COMPACTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall seek to enter into multi-year compacts where 
appropriate with the governments of countries that 
receive security assistance. Such compacts should in-
clude the following elements: 
(A) A joint diagnosis of the strengths and 
challenges of the recipient country’s security in-
stitutions, including priority capacity and capa-
bility requirements. 
(B) A plan for bilateral security assistance 
and cooperation that includes— 
(i) a commitment by the recipient 
specifying the manner in which security as-
165 
sistance will be used, within a defined 
timeframe; 
(ii) plans for sustainment by the re-
cipient of any capacity or capabilities built 
as a result of such assistance; and 
(iii) mutually agreed oversight mecha-
nisms for security assistance and metrics, 
to determine whether such assistance is ac-
complishing the agreed-upon objectives. 
(2) SPECIAL PROVISIONS.—If the Under Sec-
retary described in subsection (d)(3) assesses that a 
country is not abiding by baseline norms for govern-
ance or the rule of law, a compact under this sub-
section with such country should, where practicable, 
be formulated in consultation with the national legis-
lature and domestic civil society groups and include 
mutually agreed upon reforms and conditions based 
on those established as a result of such determina-
tion in accordance with subsection (d)(4). 
(f) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Beginning 3 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually 
thereafter, the Secretary shall include with any materials 
submitted in support of the budget for that fiscal year that 
is submitted to Congress by the President under section
166 
1105(a) of title 31 an unclassified report, that may in-
clude a classified annex, with the following: 
(1) A list of priority security assistance recipi-
ents, along with descriptions of the policy objectives 
that the Secretary seeks to achieve by providing 
such assistance to such recipients, developed pursu-
ant to subsection (d)(1). 
(2) A description of the results of the evalua-
tions conducted pursuant to subsection (c)(4). 
(3) A description of the manner in which the 
Department will allocate, monitor, and evaluate all 
security assistance pursuant to the program de-
scribed in subsection (c) and the planning process 
described in subsection (d). 
(4) A description of any updates made during 
the previous year to the framework described in sub-
section (d)(1) and annex relating to security assist-
ance required under subsection (d)(2). 
(5) The status and impact on United States ob-
jectives of any compacts entered into in accordance 
with subsection (e) and of any ongoing efforts to 
enter into new compacts in accordance with such 
subsection.
167 
SEC. 814. INTERAGENCY COORDINATION OF SECURITY AS-
SISTANCE, TRANSFERS, AND SECURITY CO-
OPERATION. 
(a) CREATION OF A COMMON DATABASE.—Not later 
than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of De-
fense and other appropriate Federal departments and 
agencies, shall maintain a common database of informa-
tion to permit the identification of security assistance pro-
grams, funding, and transfers by recipient country. 
(b) COORDINATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, 
in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall 
submit a report to the appropriate congressional 
committees that assesses existing mechanisms, in-
cluding provisions under title 10, United States 
Code, that require the concurrence of the Secretary 
of State, and other applicable provisions of law that 
provide for coordination between security assistance 
programs, projects, and activities of the Department 
of State and security cooperation programs, projects, 
and activities of the Department of Defense that in-
cludes the following:
168 
(A) An identification of existing coordina-
tion mechanisms for planning, executing, and 
overseeing security assistance and security co-
operation programs, projects, and activities, the 
purpose of such mechanisms, and their efficacy 
in practice. 
(B) An identification of additional meas-
ures that would improve the speed, simplicity, 
or agility of each identified mechanism, with a 
focus on mechanisms requiring the concurrence 
of the Secretary. 
(C) An identification of any programs, au-
thorities, or resources that do not require co-
ordination under existing law. 
(D) An identification of the specific mecha-
nisms to improve coordination between Depart-
ment of State bureaus and offices involved in 
planning, executing, or overseeing security as-
sistance programs and activities and the United 
States combatant command or commands rel-
evant to such bureaus and offices. 
(E) An assessment of the advisability and 
feasibility of expanding existing mechanisms or 
establishing new mechanisms to detail employ-
ees from Department of State bureaus and of-
169 
fices involved in planning, executing, or over-
seeing security assistance programs and activi-
ties to United States combatant commands and 
from the Department of Defense to such De-
partment of State bureaus and offices for the 
purpose of improving coordination on security 
assistance planning and implementation. 
(2) APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMIT-
TEES DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘ap-
propriate congressional committees’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
the Committee on Armed Services of the House 
of Representatives; and 
(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations 
and the Committee on Armed Services of the 
Senate. 
(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Secretary of State and the Secretary of De-
fense should jointly establish a pilot program to evaluate 
the advisability and feasibility of a joint entity to conduct 
collaborative planning of security assistance and security 
cooperation. The pilot program should— 
(1) establish one or more joint planning cells to 
conduct collaborative planning between the Depart-
ment of State and the Department of Defense for
170 
security assistance and security cooperation pro-
grams, projects, and activities in a specific region or 
regions; 
(2) assign personnel from relevant offices and 
agencies within each Department to staff the joint 
planning cell or cells; and 
(3) assess the advantages and disadvantages of 
collaborative interagency planning of security assist-
ance, and determine whether there are organiza-
tional, legal, policy, or resource barriers to broader 
adoption of such a model. 
SEC. 815. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 
Nothing in this subtitle shall affect the implementa-
tion of subsection (h) of section 36 of the Arms Export 
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776). 
Subtitle B—Foreign Military 
Assistance 
SEC. 821. STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF EXCESS DEFENSE 
ARTICLES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 516 of the Foreign Assist-
ance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j), is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(1) The President’’ and 
inserting ‘‘The President’’;
171 
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 
through (F) as paragraphs (1) through (6), re-
spectively, and moving the margins of each such 
paragraph 2 ems to the left; and 
(C) by striking ‘‘(2) Accordingly,’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘1990.’’; 
(2) in subsection (c)— 
(A) by striking paragraph (2) and insert-
ing the following: 
‘‘(2) PRIORITY.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, excess defense articles under this 
section shall be transferred in accordance with 
United States foreign policy, including national secu-
rity priorities as jointly determined by the Secretary 
of State, in consultation with the Secretary of De-
fense, to the maximum extent feasible.’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(3) SUPPORTING COSTS.—The Department of 
State is authorized to expend funds available for se-
curity assistance for the refurbishment or upgrade of 
excess defense articles transferred under the author-
ity of this section and for training of foreign security 
forces directly in relation to excess defense articles 
transferred under the authority of this section, if—
172 
‘‘(A) such assistance is necessary to ad-
vance the national security objectives of the 
United States in relation to the recipient coun-
try or countries; and 
‘‘(B) such costs do not exceed $10 million 
in relation to a single transfer of excess defense 
articles under this section.’’; 
(3) 
in 
subsection 
(f)(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$7,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$25,000,000’’; and 
(4) 
in 
subsection 
(g)(1), 
by 
striking 
‘‘$500,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$600,000,000’’. 
SEC. 822. MODIFICATION OF PURPOSES FOR WHICH MILI-
TARY SALES BY THE UNITED STATES ARE AU-
THORIZED. 
Section 4 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2754) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘inter-
nal security’’ and inserting ‘‘legitimate internal security 
(including for anti-terrorism purposes)’’. 
SEC. 823. RETURN OF DEFENSE ARTICLES. 
Section 21(m)(1)(B) of the Arms Export Control Act 
(22 U.S.C. 2761(m)(1)(B)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(B) is not’’ and inserting 
‘‘(B)(i) is not’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 
and
173 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(ii) is significant military equipment (as 
defined in section 47(9) of this Act) and the 
Secretary of State has provided prior approval 
of the return of such defense article from the 
foreign country or international organization; 
and’’. 
SEC. 824. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS FOR 
LICENSING OF DEFENSE ITEMS. 
Section 38(j) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2778(j)) is amended— 
(1) in the subsection heading— 
(A) by striking ‘‘COUNTRY’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘TO
FOREIGN
COUN-
TRIES’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1)(A)— 
(A) in the matter preceding clause (i)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘a foreign country’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization, any member country of that 
Organization, the Republic of Korea, Aus-
tralia, New Zealand, Japan, or Israel’’; 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘(except that the 
President may not so exempt such Organi-
zation, member country, or other country
174 
that is not eligible to acquire defense items 
under any other provision of law)’’ after 
‘‘with respect to exports of defense items’’; 
and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘the foreign country’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such Organization, member 
country, or other country’’; and 
(B) in clause (ii)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘the foreign country’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such Organization, member 
country, or other country’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘under their domestic 
laws’’; 
(3) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) in the matter preceding clause 
(i)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘, at a min-
imum,’’; 
(II) by striking ‘‘the foreign 
country’’ and inserting ‘‘the Organiza-
tion, member country, or other coun-
try referred to in paragraph (1)’’; and 
(III) by striking ‘‘to revise its 
policies and practices, and promulgate
175 
or enact necessary modifications to its 
laws and regulations to establish’’ and 
inserting ‘‘to establish and maintain’’; 
(ii) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘the for-
eign country’’ and inserting ‘‘such Organi-
zation, member country, or other country’’; 
and 
(iii) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘re-
transfer control commitments, including 
securing’’ and inserting ‘‘retransfer con-
trols that secure’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) in the matter preceding clause 
(i)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘, at a min-
imum,’’; 
(II) by striking ‘‘the foreign 
country’’ and inserting ‘‘the Organiza-
tion, member country, or other coun-
try referred to in paragraph (1)’’; and 
(III) by striking ‘‘to revise its 
policies and practices, and promulgate 
or enact necessary modifications to its 
laws and regulations’’; and
176 
(ii) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘the for-
eign country’’ and inserting ‘‘the member 
country or other country’’; and 
(4) in paragraph (3)— 
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
(A), by striking ‘‘a foreign country’’ and insert-
ing ‘‘the Organization, member country, or 
other country referred to in paragraph (1)’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘that 
foreign country’’ and inserting ‘‘such Organiza-
tion, member country, or other country’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘the foreign country’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such Organization, member 
country, or other country’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘has promulgated or 
enacted all necessary modifications to its 
laws and regulations to comply’’ and in-
serting ‘‘has taken such actions to com-
ply’’; and 
(D) in subparagraph (C)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘a foreign country’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such Organization, member 
country, or other country’’; and
177 
(ii) by striking ‘‘that country’’ and in-
serting ‘‘such Organization, member coun-
try, or other country’’. 
SEC. 825. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL PROVISIONS. 
Section 42(a) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2791(a)) is amended in the first sentence by insert-
ing ‘‘on a competitive basis’’ after ‘‘procurement in the 
United States’’. 
SEC. 826. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO ARMS EXPORT 
CONTROL ACT. 
Section 36(b)(6) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
U.S.C. 2776(b)(6)) is amended by inserting ‘‘the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization or’’ before ‘‘a member coun-
try’’. 
SEC. 827. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON LICENSING UNDER 
UNITED STATES ARMS EXPORT CONTROL 
PROGRAMS. 
It is the sense of Congress that, in implementing re-
forms of United States arms export licensing regimes, the 
President should prioritize the development of a new 
framework to improve and streamline licensing, including 
by seeking to revise the Special Comprehensive Export Au-
thorizations for exports to the North Atlantic Treaty Or-
ganization, any member country of that Organization, 
Sweden, or any other country described in section
178 
36(c)(2)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2776(c)(2)(A)) under section 126.14 of title 15, Code of 
Federal Regulations (relating to the International Traffic 
in Arms Regulations). 
SEC. 828. EXTENSION OF WAR RESERVE STOCKPILE AU-
THORITY. 
(a) DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS 
ACT, 2005.—Section 12001(d) of the Department of De-
fense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 
118 Stat. 1011) is amended by striking ‘‘2020’’ and in-
serting ‘‘2021’’. 
(b) STOCKPILING OF DEFENSE ARTICLES FOR FOR-
EIGN COUNTRIES.—Section 514(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h(b)(2)(A)) is 
amended by striking ‘‘and 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2020, 
and 2021’’. 
SEC. 829. PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS AND OTHER NA-
TIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 
(a) AUTHORITY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 551 of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2348) is amend-
ed— 
(A) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘The 
President’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) The President’’; 
and
179 
(B) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(b) Funds authorized to be appropriated under this 
chapter may also be used to provide assistance to enhance 
the capacity of foreign civilian security forces (as such 
term is defined in section 841(c) of the International Se-
curity Assistance Act of 2019) to participate in peace-
keeping and counterterrorism operations, and to promote 
greater participation of women in such peacekeeping oper-
ations. 
‘‘(c) Funds authorized to be appropriated under this 
chapter to provide assistance to friendly foreign countries 
for purposes other than support for multilateral peace-
keeping operations shall be subject to the certification re-
quirements of section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act 
(22 U.S.C. 2776).’’. 
(2) DISARMAMENT AND REINTEGRATION.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, funds authorized to be 
appropriated under any provision of law for 
peacekeeping operations may be made available 
to support programs to disarm, demobilize, and 
reintegrate into civilian society former members 
of foreign terrorist organizations, and to pro-
mote greater participation of women in such 
programs.
180 
(B) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall 
consult with the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Foreign Relations and the Committee on 
Appropriations of the Senate prior to obligating 
funds described in subparagraph (A). 
(C) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the 
term ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means an 
organization designated as a terrorist organiza-
tion under section 219(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)). 
(b) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary shall notify the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Ap-
propriations of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on 
Appropriations of the Senate at least 15 days prior to obli-
gating funds under any provision of law for peacekeeping 
operations. 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for 
chapter 6 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 
(22 U.S.C. 2348 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: ‘‘AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY PRO-
GRAMS’’.
181 
SEC. 830. OTHER AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY ASSISTANCE 
AUTHORITIES. 
The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is amended as 
follows: 
(1) In section 516 (22 U.S.C. 2321j)— 
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘coun-
tries’’ and inserting ‘‘countries, regional organi-
zations, and international organizations’’; 
(B) in subsection (b)(5), as redesignated 
by section 821(a)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘countries’’ 
and inserting ‘‘countries, regional organizations, 
and international organizations’’; 
(C) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘re-
cipient country’’ and inserting ‘‘recipient coun-
try or organization’’; 
(D) in subsection (f)(2)— 
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
‘‘country’’ each place it appears and insert-
ing ‘‘country or organization’’; and 
(ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking 
‘‘countries’’ and inserting ‘‘countries or or-
ganizations’’; and 
(E) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘coun-
try’’ and inserting ‘‘country and organization’’. 
(2) In section 620M (22 U.S.C. 2378d)—