datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall
be deemed to be a reference to the Robert W. Davis Post
Office Building.
Æ
‘‘(C) that the client, if contacted, will be 
contacted solely for program performance eval-
uation or audit purposes. 
‘‘(4) REPORT
TO
CONGRESS.—The Adminis-
trator of the Small Business Administration shall in-
clude findings from any internal program perform-
ance evaluations in the Administration’s annual re-
port to the Committee on Small Business and Entre-
preneurship of the Senate and the Committee on 
Small Business of the House of Representatives.’’.
Æ
from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice 
and consent of the Senate. 
(b) PROHIBITION ON DUAL SERVICE AS GENERAL 
COUNSEL OF ANOTHER AGENCY.—The individual serving 
in the position of General Counsel of the National Intel-
ligence Authority may not, while so serving, also serve as 
the General Counsel of any other department, agency, or 
element of the United States Government. 
(c) SCOPE OF POSITION.—The General Counsel of 
the National Intelligence Authority is the chief legal offi-
cer of the National Intelligence Authority. 
(d) FUNCTIONS.—The General Counsel of the Na-
tional Intelligence Authority shall perform such functions 
as the National Intelligence Director may prescribe. 
SEC. 117. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE NATIONAL INTEL-
LIGENCE AUTHORITY. 
(a) OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF NATIONAL 
INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY.—There is an Office of the 
Inspector General of the National Intelligence Authority. 
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Office of the In-
spector General of the National Intelligence Authority is 
to—
(1) create an objective and effective office, ap-
propriately accountable to Congress, to initiate and
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service lo-
cated at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe
Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2002.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 1374
One Hundred Seventh Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two
An Act
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 600 Calumet
Street in Lake Linden, Michigan, as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service located at
600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan, shall be known
and designated as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,
or other record of the United States to the facility referred to
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Philip
E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1374
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at
600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan, as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe
Post Office Building’’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 3, 2001
Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Government Reform
A BILL
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PHILIP E. RUPPE POST OFFICE BUILDING.
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States
Postal Service located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Lin-
den, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the
‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg-
ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall
be deemed to be a reference to the Philip E. Ruppe Post
Office Building.
Æ
IIB
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1374
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
APRIL 17, 2002
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 1374 RFS
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service lo-
cated at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe
Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2002.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
II
Calendar No. 396
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1374
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
APRIL 17, 2002
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs
MAY 23, 2002
Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service
located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The facility of the United States Postal Service lo-
cated at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,
shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe
Post Office Building’’.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.
Calendar No. 396
107TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 1374
AN ACT
To designate the facility of the United States Post-
al Service located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake
Linden, Michigan, as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post
Office Building’’.
MAY 23, 2002
Reported without amendment
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1375
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the labor costs
relating to items and services furnished in a geographically reclassified
hospital for which reimbursement under the Medicare Program is pro-
vided on a prospective basis.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 3, 2001
Mr. STUPAK (for himself, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. FROST, Mr. PAUL, Mr.
COSTELLO, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. FARR of California, and Mr. OSBORNE)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust
the labor costs relating to items and services furnished
in a geographically reclassified hospital for which reim-
bursement under the Medicare Program is provided on
a prospective basis.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Geographic
Adjustment Fairness Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. HOSPITAL GEOGRAPHIC RECLASSIFICATION FOR
LABOR COSTS FOR ALL ITEMS AND SERVICES
REIMBURSED 
UNDER 
PROSPECTIVE 
PAY-
MENT SYSTEMS.
Section 1886(d)(10)(D) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)), as amended by section
304(a) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits
Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (as enacted into
law by section 1(a)(6) of Public Law 106–554), is amend-
ed by adding at the end the following new clause:
‘‘(vii)(I) Any decision of the Board to reclassify a
subsection (d) hospital for purposes of the adjustment fac-
tor described in subparagraph (C)(i)(II) for fiscal year
2001 or any fiscal year thereafter shall apply for purposes
of adjusting payments for variations in costs that are at-
tributable to wages and wage-related costs for PPS-reim-
bursed items and services.
‘‘(II) For purposes of subclause (I), the term ‘PPS-
reimbursed items and services’ means each item and serv-
ice for which payment is made under this title on a pro-
spective basis and adjusted for variations in costs that are
attributable to wages or wage-related costs that is fur-
nished by the hospital to which such decision applies, or
by a provider-based entity or department of that hospital
(as determined by the Secretary).’’.
Æ
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4854
To establish the Commission to Establish the National Museum of the Amer-
ican Latino to develop a plan of action for the establishment and mainte-
nance of the National Museum of the American Latino in Washington, 
D.C., and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JULY 19, 2004
Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. ORTIZ, 
Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA´, Mr. BACA, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. FROST, Mr. GON-
ZALEZ, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. LEE, Mr. 
MEEKS of New York, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. ROYBAL-
ALLARD, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SOLIS, and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
House Administration 
A BILL 
To establish the Commission to Establish the National Mu-
seum of the American Latino to develop a plan of action 
for the establishment and maintenance of the National 
Museum of the American Latino in Washington, D.C., 
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1376
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that transfers
of family-owned business interests shall be exempt from estate taxation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 3, 2001
Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MATSUI,
Mr. FARR of California, Mr. OSE, Mr. RADANOVICH, and Mr. DOOLEY
of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide
that transfers of family-owned business interests shall
be exempt from estate taxation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Business Pres-
ervation Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. UNLIMITED DEDUCTION FROM ESTATE FOR FAM-
ILY-OWNED BUSINESS INTERESTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 2057 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to family-
owned business interests) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—For purposes of
the tax imposed by section 2001, in the case of an estate
of a decedent to which this section applies, the value of
the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from
the value of the gross estate the adjusted value of the
qualified family-owned business interests of the decedent
which are described in subsection (b)(2).’’
(b) FULL RECAPTURE (WITHOUT INTEREST) IF
QUALIFIED HEIR DISPOSES OF PROPERTY, ETC.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section
2057(f) of such Code is amended by striking sub-
paragraphs (A) and (B), by redesignating subpara-
graph (C) as subparagraph (B), and by inserting
after the paragraph heading the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The amount of the
additional estate tax imposed by paragraph (1)
shall be equal to the adjusted tax difference at-
tributable to the qualified family-owned busi-
ness interest.’’
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1)
of section 2057(f) of such Code is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘within 10 years after the date of the decedent’s
death and’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1378
To authorize grants for certain water and waste disposal facility projects
in rural areas.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 3, 2001
Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To authorize grants for certain water and waste disposal
facility projects in rural areas.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mahoning Valley Infra-
structure Improvement Act of 2001’’.
SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR CERTAIN WATER AND WASTE DIS-
POSAL 
FACILITY 
PROJECTS 
IN 
THE
MAHONING VALLEY OF OHIO.
From amounts made available for grants under sec-
tion 306C(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Devel-
opment Act for fiscal year 2002, the Secretary of Agri-
culture shall—
(1) make a grant pursuant to such section in
an amount equal to $6,000,000 for a project for the
extension of waterlines in Milton Township, Ohio,
and Craig Beach Village, Ohio; and
(2) make a grant pursuant to such section in
an amount equal to $45,000,000 for sewer line
projects in rural communities in Trumbull County,
Ohio.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 137
To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made by the National
Endowment for the Arts from funds made available for fiscal year 2001.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2001
Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made
by the National Endowment for the Arts from funds
made available for fiscal year 2001.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPEALER.
Section 319(d) of Public Law 106–291 is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2), and
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as
paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
(c) PRIORITY.—In providing grants under this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall give priority to grants to acquire
easements that—
(1) are in areas where rapid population growth
and increasing land values are creating development
pressures that threaten traditional use of land and
the ability to maintain open space; and
(2) in comparison to other easements for which
grant applications are submitted under this section
in the same year, will provide the greatest conserva-
tion benefit for wildlife, fish, natural resources, or
open space while maintaining the traditional use of
land.
(d) COST SHARING.—
(1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of
the cost of acquiring a conservation easement with
a grant under this section may not exceed 50 per-
cent of the total cost of acquiring the easement.
(2) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—Subject to such
reasonable conditions as the Secretary may estab-
lish, the Secretary shall apply to the non-Federal
share of the cost of such acquisition the value of any
land, interest in land, good, or service applied to
that acquisition.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act and the amendments made by section 1
shall take effect on October 1, 2000.
Æ
I
107TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 1381
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Cooperative Landscape
Conservation Program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 3, 2001
Mr. UDALL of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish the
Cooperative Landscape Conservation Program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperative Landscape
Conservation Act’’.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Act is to establish a program ad-
ministered by the Secretary of the Interior to provide
matching grants to certain eligible entities to facilitate the
acquisition of permanent conservation easements on lands
(e) TITLE; ENFORCEMENT.—Title to a conservation
easement acquired with a grant under this section may
be held and enforced only by an eligible entity.
(f) STATE CERTIFICATION.—As a condition of the re-
ceipt by an eligible entity of a grant under subsection (a),
the attorney general of the State in which the conservation
easement is to be acquired using the grant funds must
certify that the conservation easement to be acquired is
in a form that is sufficient, under the laws of the State,
to achieve the conservation purposes of the easement and
the terms and conditions of the grant.
(g) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may
not use more than 10 percent of the amount that is avail-
able for any fiscal year to carry out this Act to provide
technical assistance to carry out this section.
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘‘eligible enti-
ty’’ means—
(A) an agency of a State or local govern-
ment;
(B) a federally recognized Indian tribe; or
(C) any organization that is organized for,
and at all times since its formation has been
operated principally for, one or more of the con-
servation purposes specified in clause (i), (ii), or
(iii) of section 170(h)(4)(A) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and—
(i) is described in section 501(c)(3) of
the Code;
(ii) is exempt from taxation under
section 501(a) of the Code; and
(iii)(I) is described in paragraph (2)
of section 509(a) of the Code; or
(II) is described in paragraph (3) of
such section, but is controlled by an orga-
nization described in paragraph (2) of such
section.
(2) TRADITIONAL USE.—The term ‘‘traditional
use’’ means the uses of land that are in practice at
the time of the submission of an application for a
grant under this section.
SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec-
retary of the Interior to carry out this Act $100,000,000
for each of the fiscal years 2002 through 2007.
Æ
‘‘SEC. 425. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT. 
‘‘The Secretary shall reduce the amount otherwise 
payable to a State or Indian tribe under this part for a 
particular fiscal year by the amount (if any) by which the 
total amount of qualified expenditures of the State or 
tribe, as the case may be, from State and local sources 
or from tribal sources, as the case may be, in fiscal year 
2003 exceeds the total amount of qualified expenditures 
of the State or tribe, as the case may be, in the particular 
fiscal year. 
‘‘SEC. 426. FUNDING FOR STATE COURTS TO ASSESS AND 
IMPROVE HANDLING OF PROCEEDINGS RE-
LATING TO FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION. 
‘‘(a) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make 
grants, in accordance with this section, to the highest 
State courts in States participating in the program under 
part E, for the purpose of enabling such courts—
‘‘(1) to conduct assessments, in accordance with 
such requirements as the Secretary shall publish, of 
the role, responsibilities, and effectiveness of State 
courts in carrying out State laws requiring pro-
ceedings (conducted by or under the supervision of 
the courts)—
‘‘(A) that implement this part and part E; 
‘‘(B) that determine the advisability or ap-
propriateness of foster care placement;
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Walk National
Historic Trail Study Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in
the winter of 1864, the United States Government
forced thousands of Navajos and Mescalero Apaches
to relocate from their ancestral lands to Fort Sum-
ner, New Mexico, where the tribal members were
held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over
4 years.
(2) Thousands of Native Americans died at
Fort Sumner from starvation, malnutrition, disease,
exposure, or conflicts between the tribes and United
States military personnel.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.
Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16
U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
‘‘(ll) The Long Walk Trail, a series of routes
which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes
were forced to walk beginning in the fall of 1863 as a
result of their removal by the United States Government
from their ancestral lands, generally located within a cor-
ridor extending through portions of Canyon de Chelley,
Arizona, and Albuquerque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico,
Canyon Piedra Pintado, and Fort Sumner, New Mexico.’’.
Passed the House of Representatives October 2,
2001.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 1384
One Hundred Seventh Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two
An Act
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route in Arizona and
New Mexico which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes were forced
to walk in 1863 and 1864, for study for potential addition to the National Trails
System.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Walk National Historic
Trail Study Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in the winter
of 1864, the United States Government forced thousands of
Navajos and Mescalero Apaches to relocate from their ancestral
lands to Fort Sumner, New Mexico, where the tribal members
were held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over 4
years.
(2) Thousands of Native Americans died at Fort Sumner
from starvation, malnutrition, disease, exposure, or conflicts
between the tribes and United States military personnel.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.
Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C.
1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new para-
graph:
‘‘(ll) The Long Walk Trail, a series of routes which the
Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes were forced to walk
beginning in the fall of 1863 as a result of their removal by the
United States Government from their ancestral lands, generally
located within a corridor extending through portions of Canyon
H. R. 1384—2
de Chelley, Arizona, and Albuquerque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico,
Canyon Piedra Pintado, and Fort Sumner, New Mexico.’’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.