535
HR 1530 RFS
sentence and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘for any
fiscal year shall be derived from amounts made
available to the Department of Defense for that
fiscal year.’’; and
(B) by striking out ‘‘referred to in this
paragraph’’; and
(2) in paragraph (3)—
(A) by striking out ‘‘may not exceed’’ and
all that follows through ‘‘1995’’; and
(B) by inserting before the period at the
end 
the 
following: 
‘‘, 
may 
not 
exceed
$25,000,000 for fiscal year 1994, $20,000,000
for fiscal year 1995, or $15,000,000 for fiscal
year 1996’’.
SEC. 1223. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ACTIVI-
TIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNITED STATES-
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA JOINT DE-
FENSE CONVERSION COMMISSION.
Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 1996 may not be obligated or expended for
any activity associated with the United States-People’s
Republic of China Joint Defense Conversion Commission.
536
HR 1530 RFS
SEC. 1224. DEFENSE EXPORT LOAN GUARANTEES.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF PROGRAM.—(1) Chapter
148 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following new subchapter:
‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—DEFENSE EXPORT LOAN
GUARANTEES
‘‘Sec.
‘‘2540. Establishment of loan guarantee program.
‘‘2540a. Transferability.
‘‘2540b. Limitations.
‘‘2540c. Fees charged and collected.
‘‘2540d. Definitions.
‘‘§ 2540. Establishment of loan guarantee program
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—In order to meet the na-
tional security objectives in section 2501(a) of this title,
the Secretary of Defense shall establish a program under
which the Secretary may issue guarantees assuring a lend-
er against losses of principal or interest, or both principal
and interest, arising out of the financing of the sale or
long-term lease of defense articles, defense services, or de-
sign and construction services to a country referred to in
subsection (b).
‘‘(b) COVERED COUNTRIES.—The authority under
subsection (a) applies with respect to the following coun-
tries:
‘‘(1) A member nation of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO).
537
HR 1530 RFS
‘‘(2) A country designated as of March 31,
1995, as a major non-NATO ally pursuant to sec-
tion 2350a(i)(3) of this title.
‘‘(3) A country that was a member nation of
the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) as
of March 31, 1995.
‘‘(c) AUTHORITY SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS OF AP-
PROPRIATION ACTS.—The Secretary may guarantee a
loan under this subchapter only to such extent or in such
amounts as may be provided in advance in appropriations
Acts.
‘‘§ 2540a. Transferability
‘‘A guarantee issued under this subchapter shall be
fully and freely transferable.
‘‘§ 2540b. Limitations
‘‘(a) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF LOAN GUARAN-
TEES.—In issuing a guarantee under this subchapter for
a medium-term or long-term loan, the Secretary may not
offer terms and conditions more beneficial than those that
would be provided to the recipient by the Export-Import
Bank of the United States under similar circumstances
in conjunction with the provision of guarantees for
nondefense articles and services.
‘‘(b) LOSSES ARISING FROM FRAUD OR MISREPRE-
SENTATION.—No payment may be made under a guaran-
538
HR 1530 RFS
tee issued under this subchapter for a loss arising out of
fraud or misrepresentation for which the party seeking
payment is responsible.
‘‘(c) NO RIGHT OF ACCELERATION.—The Secretary
of Defense may not accelerate any guaranteed loan or in-
crement, and may not pay any amount, in respect of a
guarantee issued under this subchapter, other than in ac-
cordance with the original payment terms of the loan.
‘‘§ 2540c. Fees charged and collected
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall
charge a fee (known as ‘exposure fee’) for each guarantee
issued under this subchapter.
‘‘(b) AMOUNT.—To the extent that the cost of the
loan guarantees under this subchapter is not otherwise
provided for in appropriations Acts, the fee imposed under
this section with respect to a loan guarantee shall be fixed
in an amount sufficient to meet potential liabilities of the
United States under the loan guarantee.
‘‘(c) PAYMENT TERMS.—The fee for each guarantee
shall become due as the guarantee is issued. In the case
of a guarantee for a loan which is disbursed incrementally,
and for which the guarantee is correspondingly issued in-
crementally as portions of the loan are disbursed, the fee
shall be paid incrementally in proportion to the amount
of the guarantee that is issued.
539
HR 1530 RFS
‘‘§ 2540d. Definitions
‘‘In this subchapter:
‘‘(1) The terms ‘defense article’, ‘defense serv-
ices’, and ‘design and construction services’ have the
meanings given those terms in section 47 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794).
‘‘(2) The term ‘cost’, with respect to a loan
guarantee, has the meaning given that term in sec-
tion 502 of the Congressional Budget and Impound-
ment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a).’’.
(2) The table of subchapters at the beginning of such
chapter is amended by adding at the end the following
new item:
‘‘VI. Defense Export Loan Guarantees .................................................... 2540’’.
(b) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit
to Congress a report on the loan guarantee program estab-
lished pursuant to section 2540 of title 10, United States
Code, as added by subsection (a). The report shall in-
clude—
(1) an analysis of the costs and benefits of the
loan guarantee program; and
(2) any recommendations for modification of
the program that the President considers appro-
priate, including—
540
HR 1530 RFS
(A) any recommended addition to the list
of countries for which a guarantee may be is-
sued under the program; and
(B) any proposed legislation necessary to
authorize a recommended modification.
SEC. 1225. ACCOUNTING FOR BURDENSHARING CONTRIBU-
TIONS.
(a) AUTHORITY TO MANAGE CONTRIBUTIONS
IN
LOCAL CURRENCY, ETC.—Subsection (b) of section 2350j
of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as
follows:
‘‘(b) ACCOUNTING.—Contributions accepted under
subsection (a) which are not related to security assistance
may be accepted, managed, and expended in dollars or in
the currency of the host nation (or, in the case of a con-
tribution from a regional organization, in the currency in
which the contribution was provided). Any such contribu-
tion shall be placed in an account established for such pur-
pose and shall remain available until expended for the pur-
poses specified in subsection (c). The Secretary of Defense
shall establish a separate account for such purpose for
each country or regional organization from which such
contributions are accepted under subsection (a).’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (d) of
such section is amended by striking out ‘‘credited under
541
HR 1530 RFS
subsection (b) to an appropriation account of the Depart-
ment of Defense’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘placed in
an account established under subsection (b)’’.
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Such section is fur-
ther amended—
(1) in subsection (e)(1), by striking out ‘‘a re-
port to the congressional defense committees’’ and
inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘to the congressional com-
mittees specified in subsection (g) a report’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section:
‘‘(g) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congres-
sional committees referred to in subsection (e)(1) are—
‘‘(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
‘‘(2) the Committee on National Security and
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.’’.
SEC. 1226. AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR
EXPENSES OF RELOCATION WITHIN HOST NA-
TION OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES
OVERSEAS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Subchapter II of chapter 138
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at
the end the following new section:
542
HR 1530 RFS
‘‘§ 2350k. Relocation within host nation of elements of
armed forces overseas
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS.—The
Secretary of Defense may accept contributions from any
nation because of or in support of the relocation of ele-
ments of the armed forces from or to any location within
that nation. Such contributions may be accepted in dollars
or in the currency of the host nation. Any such contribu-
tion shall be placed in an account established for such pur-
pose and shall remain available until expended for the pur-
poses specified in subsection (b). The Secretary shall es-
tablish a separate account for such purpose for each coun-
try from which such contributions are accepted.
‘‘(b) USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary may
use a contribution accepted under subsection (a) only for
payment of costs incurred in connection with the reloca-
tion concerning which the contribution was made. Those
costs include the following:
‘‘(1) Design and construction services, including
development and review of statements of work, mas-
ter plans and designs, acquisition of construction,
and supervision and administration of contracts re-
lating thereto.
‘‘(2) Transportation and movement services, in-
cluding packing, unpacking, storage, and transpor-
tation.
543
HR 1530 RFS
‘‘(3) Communications services, including instal-
lation and deinstallation of communications equip-
ment, transmission of messages and data, and rental
of transmission capability.
‘‘(4) Supply and administration, including ac-
quisition of expendable office supplies, rental of of-
fice space, budgeting and accounting services, audit-
ing services, secretarial services, and translation
services.
‘‘(5) Personnel costs, including salary, allow-
ances and overhead of employees whether full-time
or part-time, temporary or permanent (except for
military personnel), and travel and temporary duty
costs.
‘‘(6) All other clearly identifiable expenses di-
rectly related to relocation.
‘‘(c) METHOD
OF CONTRIBUTION.—Contributions
may be accepted in any of the following forms:
‘‘(1) Irrevocable letter of credit issued by a fi-
nancial institution acceptable to the Treasurer of the
United States.
‘‘(2) Drawing rights on a commercial bank ac-
count established and funded by the host nation,
which account is blocked such that funds deposited
544
HR 1530 RFS
cannot be withdrawn except by or with the approval
of the United States.
‘‘(3) Cash, which shall be deposited in a sepa-
rate trust fund in the United States Treasury pend-
ing expenditure and which shall accrue interest in
accordance with section 9702 of title 31.
‘‘(d) ANNUAL REPORT
TO CONGRESS.—Not later
than 30 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Sec-
retary shall submit to Congress a report specifying—
‘‘(1) the amount of the contributions accepted
by the Secretary during the preceding fiscal year
under subsection (a) and the purposes for which the
contributions were made; and
‘‘(2) the amount of the contributions expended
by the Secretary during the preceding fiscal year
and the purposes for which the contributions were
expended.’’.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of sub-
chapter II of chapter 138 of such title is amended by add-
ing at the end the following new item:
‘‘2350k. Relocation within host nation of elements of armed forces overseas.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 2350k of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take
effect on October 1, 1995, and shall apply to contributions
for relocation of elements of the Armed Forces in or to
any nation received on or after such date.
545
HR 1530 RFS
SEC. 1227. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ABM TREATY VIOLA-
TIONS.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:
(1) The 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty pro-
hibits either party from deploying ballistic missile
early warning radars except at locations along the
periphery of its national territory and oriented out-
ward.
(2) The 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty pro-
hibits either party from deploying an ABM system
to defend its national territory and from providing
a base for any such nationwide defense.
(3) Large phased-array radars were recognized
during negotiation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Trea-
ty as the critical long lead-time element of a nation-
wide defense against ballistic missiles.
(4) In 1983 the United States discovered the
construction, in the interior of the Soviet Union near
the town of Krasnoyarsk, of a large phased-array
radar that was judged to be for ballistic missile early
warning and tracking.
(5) The Krasnoyarsk radar was certified by the
Reagan Administration and previous sessions of
Congress as an unequivocal violation by the Soviet
Union of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
546
HR 1530 RFS
(6) Retired Soviet General Y.V. Votintsev, Di-
rector of the Soviet National Air Defense Forces
from 1967 to 1985, has publicly stated that he was
directed by the Chief of the Soviet General staff to
locate the large phased-array radar at Krasnoyarsk
despite the recognition that its location would be a
clear violation of the ABM Treaty.
(7) General Votintsev has publicly stated that
Marshal D.F. Ustinov, Soviet Minister of Defense,
threatened to relieve from duty any Soviet officer
who continued to object to the construction of a
large-phased array radar at Krasnoyarsk.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that—
(1) the government of the Soviet Union inten-
tionally violated its legal obligations under the 1972
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in order to advance its
national security interests; and
(2) the United States should remain vigilant in
ensuring compliance by Russia with its arms control
obligations and should, when pursuing future arms
control agreements with Russia, bear in mind viola-
tions of arms control obligations by the Soviet
Union.
547
HR 1530 RFS
SEC. 1228. REDUCTION OF UNITED STATES MILITARY
FORCES IN EUROPE.
(a) END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS
FOR MILITARY
PERSONNEL
IN
EUROPE.—Notwithstanding 
section
1002(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act,
1985 (22 U.S.C. 1928 note), but subject to subsection (d),
for each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, the
Secretary of Defense shall reduce the end strength level
of members of the Armed Forces of the United States as-
signed to permanent duty ashore in European member na-
tions of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
in accordance with subsection (b).
(b) REDUCTION FORMULA.—
(1) APPLICATION OF FORMULA.—For each per-
centage point by which, as of the end of a fiscal
year, the allied contribution level determined under
paragraph (2) is less than the allied contribution
goal specified in subsection (c), the Secretary of De-
fense shall reduce the end strength level of members
of the Armed Forces of the United States assigned
to permanent duty ashore in European member na-
tions of NATO by 1,000 for the next fiscal year.
The reduction shall be made from the end strength
level in effect, pursuant to section 1002(c)(1) of the
National Defense Authorization Act, 1985 (22
U.S.C. 1928 note), and subsection (a) of this section
548
HR 1530 RFS
(if applicable), for the fiscal year in which the allied
contribution level is less than the goal specified in
subsection (c).
(2) DETERMINATION OF ALLIED CONTRIBUTION
LEVEL.—To determine the allied contribution level
with respect to a fiscal year, the Secretary of De-
fense shall calculate the aggregate amount of
nonpersonnel costs for United States military instal-
lations in European member nations of NATO that
are assumed during that fiscal year by such nations,
except that the Secretary may consider only those
cash and in-kind contributions by such nations that
replace expenditures that would otherwise be made
by the Secretary using funds appropriated or other-
wise made available in defense appropriations Acts.
(c) ANNUAL ALLIED CONTRIBUTION GOALS.—
(1) GOALS.—In continuing efforts to enter into
revised host-nation agreements as described in the
provisions of law specified in paragraph (2), the
President is urged to seek to have European member
nations of NATO assume an increased share of the
nonpersonnel costs of United States military instal-
lations in those nations in accordance with the fol-
lowing timetable:
549
HR 1530 RFS
(A) By September 30, 1996, 18.75 percent
of such costs should be assumed by those na-
tions.
(B) By September 30, 1997, 37.5 percent
of such costs should be assumed by those na-
tions.
(C) By September 30, 1998, 56.25 percent
of such costs should be assumed by those na-
tions.
(D) By September 30, 1999, 75 percent of
such costs should be assumed by those nations.
(2) SPECIFIED LAWS.—The provisions of law
referred to in paragraph (1) are—
(A) section 1301(e) of National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public
Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2545);
(B) section 1401(c) of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994
(Public Law 103–160; 107 Stat. 1824); and
(C) section 1304 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public
Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2890),
(d) EXCEPTIONS.—
(1) MINIMUM
END
STRENGTH
AUTHORITY.—
Notwithstanding reductions required pursuant to
550
HR 1530 RFS
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may main-
tain an end strength of at least 25,000 members of
the Armed Forces of the United States assigned to
permanent duty ashore in European member nations
of NATO.
(2) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The President may
waive operation of this section if the President de-
clares an emergency. The President shall imme-
diately inform Congress of any such waiver and the
reasons for the waiver.
(e) ALLOCATION OF FORCE REDUCTIONS.—To the
extent that there is a reduction in end strength level for
any of the Armed Forces in European member nations
of NATO in a fiscal year pursuant to subsection (a)—
(1) half of the reduction shall be used to make
a corresponding reduction in the authorized end
strength level for active duty personnel for such
Armed Force for that fiscal year; and
(2) half of the reduction shall be used to make
a corresponding increase in permanent assignments
or deployments of forces in the United States or
other nations (other than European member nations
of NATO) for each such Armed Force for that fiscal
year, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
551
HR 1530 RFS
(f) NONPERSONNEL COSTS DEFINED.—For purposes
of this section, the term ‘‘nonpersonnel costs’’, with re-
spect to United States military installations in European
member nations of NATO, means costs for those installa-
tions other than costs paid from military personnel ac-
counts.
SEC. 1229. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING UNILATERAL
IMPLEMENTATION OF START II TREATY.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that—
(1) the START II Treaty has not entered into
force; and
(2) the United States is nevertheless taking
unilateral steps to implement the reductions in stra-
tegic forces called for by that treaty.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the Secretary of Defense should not implement
any reduction in strategic forces that is called for in the
START II Treaty unless and until that treaty enters into
force.
(c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the
term ‘‘START II Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the
United States of America and the Russian Federation on
Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive
Arms.
552
HR 1530 RFS
SEC. 1230. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING THE
CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) events such as the March 1995 terrorist re-
lease of a chemical nerve agent in the Tokyo sub-
way, the threatened use of chemical weapons during
the 1991 Persian Gulf War, and the widespread use
of chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq War of the
1980’s are all potent reminders of the menace posed
by chemical weapons, of the fact that the threat of
chemical weapons is unappreciated and not suffi-
ciently addressed, and of the need to outlaw the de-
velopment, production, and possession of chemical
weapons;
(2) the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling, and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (here-
after in this section referred to as the ‘‘Convention’’)
would establish a comprehensive ban on chemical
weapons, and its negotiation has enjoyed strong bi-
partisan congressional support, as well as the sup-
port of the last 6 administrations, both Republican
and Democratic;
(3) United States military authorities, including
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General John
Shalikashvili, have stated that United States mili-
553
HR 1530 RFS
tary forces will deter and respond to chemical weap-
ons threats with a robust chemical defense and an
overwhelming superior conventional response, as
demonstrated in the Persian Gulf War, and have
testified in support of the Convention’s ratification;
(4) the Congress in 1985 mandated the unilat-
eral destruction of the bulk of the chemical weapons
stockpile of the United States, and the Convention,
which requires participating states to destroy their
chemical arsenals and production facilities under
international supervision, would accelerate progress
toward the disarmament of chemical weapons in a
majority of the states believed to harbor chemical
weapons capabilities, as this majority is among the
Convention’s 159 signatories;
(5) the United States chemical industry was an
important partner during the negotiation of the Con-
vention, assisted in crafting a reasonable, effective
verification protocol, participated in both United
States and international trials to test provisions of
the Convention during its negotiation, and testified
in support of the Convention’s ratification;
(6) the United States intelligence community
has testified that the Convention will provide new
and important sources of information, through regu-
554
HR 1530 RFS
lar data exchanges and routine and challenge inspec-
tions, to improve the ability of the United States to
assess the chemical weapons status in countries of
concern;
(7) the Convention will gradually isolate and
automatically penalize states that refuse to join by
preventing them from gaining access to dual-use
chemicals and creating a basis for monitoring illegal
diversions of those materials;
(8) the Convention has not entered into force
for lack of the requisite number of ratifications;
(9) the United States played a leading role in
drafting the Convention, and, as a global leader,
must remain at the helm of this effort to deter fur-
ther proliferation of chemical weapons and provide
the legal framework that will minimize the threat
posed by chemical weapons;
(10) Russia has signed the Convention, but has
not yet ratified it;
(11) there have been reports by Russian sources
of continued Russian production and testing of
chemical weapons, including a statement by a
spokesman of the Russian Ministry of Defense on
December 5, 1994, that ‘‘We cannot say that all
555
HR 1530 RFS
chemical weapons production and testing has
stopped altogether.’’; and
(12) the Convention will impose a legally bind-
ing obligation on Russia and other nations that pos-
sess chemical weapons to cease offensive chemical
weapons activities and to destroy their chemical
weapons stockpiles and production facilities.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the
Congress that—
(1) the United States should signify its commit-
ment to reducing the threat posed by chemical weap-
ons by promptly joining the 28 other nations that
have ratified the Convention;
(2) both Houses of Congress should further
demonstrate United States preparedness to adopt
the Convention by acting expeditiously to pass the
required implementing legislation as soon as the
Senate gives its advice and consent to the ratifica-
tion of the Convention;
(3) both Houses of Congress should continue to
lend their full support for the indefinite future to
programs that maintain, as the Convention allows
and monitors, United States defensive preparedness
against chemical weapons;
556
HR 1530 RFS
(4) the United States must be prepared to exer-
cise fully its rights under the Convention, including
the request of challenge inspections when warranted,
and to exercise leadership in pursuing punitive
measures against violators of the Convention, when
warranted;
(5) the United States should strongly encourage
full implementation at the earliest possible date of
the terms and conditions of the United States - Rus-
sia bilateral chemical weapons destruction agreement
signed in 1990;
(6) understanding that Western assistance
would be helpful to a successful Russian chemical
weapons destruction program, the United States
should encourage Russia to ratify promptly the Con-
vention and implement a plan that will ensure full
compliance with the Convention, including the de-
struction of chemical weapons stockpiles in accord-
ance with the Convention’s time lines; and
(7) the United States should seek to encourage
other nations to ratify promptly the Convention and
to implement faithfully all its terms and conditions.
557
HR 1530 RFS
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996’’.
TITLE XXI—ARMY
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(1), the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the follow-
ing table:
Army: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ............................
Fort Rucker ...............................................
$5,900,000
Redstone Arsenal .......................................
$5,000,000
Arizona .............................
Fort Huachuca ..........................................
$18,550,000
California ..........................
Fort Irwin ..................................................
$25,500,000
Presidio of San Francisco .........................
$3,000,000
Colorado ............................
Fort Carson ...............................................
$30,850,000
District of Columbia .........
Fort McNair ..............................................
$13,500,000
Georgia .............................
Fort Benning .............................................
$37,900,000
Fort Gordon ..............................................
$5,750,000
Fort Stewart ..............................................
$8,400,000
Hawaii ..............................
Schofield Barracks ....................................
$15,000,000
Kentucky ..........................
Fort Knox ..................................................
$5,600,000
Missouri ............................
Fort Leonard Wood ...................................
$3,900,000
New Jersey .......................
Picatinny Arsenal ......................................
$5,500,000
558
HR 1530 RFS
Army: Inside the United States—Continued
State
Installation or location
Amount
New Mexico ......................
White Sands Missile Range .......................
$2,050,000
New York ..........................
Fort Drum .................................................
$11,450,000
United States Military Academy ...............
$8,300,000
Watervliet Arsenal .....................................
$680,000
North Carolina .................
Fort Bragg ................................................
$29,700,000
Oklahoma ..........................
Fort Sill .....................................................
$14,300,000
South Carolina .................
Naval Weapons Station, Charleston ..........
$25,700,000
Fort Jackson .............................................
$32,000,000
Texas ................................
Fort Hood ..................................................
$32,500,000
Fort Bliss ..................................................
$56,900,000
Fort Sam Houston ....................................
$7,000,000
Virginia .............................
Fort Eustis ................................................
$16,400,000
Fort Myer ..................................................
$17,000,000
Washington .......................
Fort Lewis .................................................
$32,100,000
CONUS Classified ............
Classified Location ....................................
$1,900,000
Total: .................................................
$472,330,000
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(a)(2), the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the locations outside the United States,
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Army: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Korea ....................................
Camp Casey ...........................................
$4,150,000
Camp Hovey ...........................................
$13,500,000
Camp Pelham .........................................
$5,600,000
Camp Stanley .........................................
$6,800,000
Yongsan .................................................
$1,450,000
Overseas Classified ...............
Classified Location .................................
$48,000,000
Total: ..............................................
$79,500,000
559
HR 1530 RFS
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition) at the installations, for the pur-
poses, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
Army: Family Housing
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Alabama ...................
Redstone Arsenal .........
118 units .................
$12,000,000
Kentucky ..................
Fort Knox ....................
262 units .................
$19,000,000
New York .................
United States Military
Academy, West Point
119 units .................
$16,500,000
Virginia ....................
Fort Lee .......................
135 units .................
$19,500,000
Washington ..............
Fort Lewis ...................
84 units ...................
$10,800,000
Total: ...............
$77,800,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not
to exceed $2,000,000.
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A),
560
HR 1530 RFS
the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military
family housing in an amount not to exceed $46,600,000.
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 1995, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of the
Army in the total amount of $2,167,190,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2101(a),
$472,330,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2101(b),
$79,500,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, Unit-
ed States Code, $9,000,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $70,778,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvements of military
family housing and facilities, $126,400,000.
561
HR 1530 RFS
(B) For support of military family housing
(including the functions described in section
2833 of title 10, United States Code),
$1,333,596,000.
(6) For the Homeowners Assistance Program,
as authorized by section 2832 of title 10, United
States Code, $75,586,000, to remain available until
expended.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
TITLE XXII—NAVY
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(1), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations and locations inside the Unit-
ed States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
562
HR 1530 RFS
Navy: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
California ..........................
Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center,
Twentynine Palms .................................
$2,490,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton .......
$27,584,000
Nav Com Control & Ocean Sur Cen
RDT&E Div, San Diego ........................
$3,170,000
Naval Air Station, Lemoore ......................
$7,600,000
Naval Air Station, North Island ...............
$99,150,000
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Divi-
sion, China Lake ...................................
$3,700,000
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Divi-
sion, Point Mugu ...................................
$1,300,000
Naval Construction Batallion Center, Port
Hueneme ................................................
$16,700,000
Naval Station, San Diego ..........................
$19,960,000
Florida ..............................
Naval School Explosive Ordinance Dis-
posal, Eglin Air Force Base ..................
$16,150,000
Naval Technical Training Center, Corry
Station, Pensacola .................................
$2,565,000
Georgia .............................
Strategic 
Weapons 
Facility, 
Atlantic,
Kings Bay ..............................................
$2,450,000
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany .......
$1,300,000
Hawaii ..............................
Intelligence Center Pacific, Pearl Harbor .
$2,200,000
Naval Com & Telecoms Area MASTSTA
EASTPAC, Honolulu ............................
$1,980,000
Naval Submarine Base, Pearl Harbor ......
$22,500,000
Illinois ...............................
Naval Training Center, Great Lakes ........
$12,440,000
Indiana .............................
Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center .......
$3,300,000
Maryland ..........................
Naval Academy, Annapolis ........................
$3,600,000
Various Maryland Locations .....................
$1,200,000
New Jersey .......................
Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Divi-
sion, Lakehurst ......................................
$1,700,000
North Carolina .................
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point ...
$11,430,000
Marine Corps Air Station, New River .......
$14,650,000
Marine Corps Base, Camp LeJeune .........
$59,300,000
Pennsylvania .....................
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard .....................
$6,000,000
South Carolina .................
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort .........
$15,000,000
Texas ................................
Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi ............
$4,400,000
Naval Air Station, Kingsville ....................
$2,710,000
Naval Station, Ingleside ............................
$2,640,000
Virginia .............................
Fleet and Industrial Supply Center, Wil-
liamsburg ...............................................
$8,390,000
Marine Corps Combat Development Com-
mand, Quantico .....................................
$3,500,000
Naval Hospital, Portsmouth ......................
$9,500,000
Naval Station, Norfolk ..............................
$28,580,000
Naval Weapons Station, Yorktown ...........
$1,300,000
Washington .......................
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division,
Keyport ..................................................
$5,300,000
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton
$19,870,000
Total: .................................................
$445,609,000
563
HR 1530 RFS
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may
acquire real property and carry out military construction
projects for the installations and locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the follow-
ing table:
Navy: Outside the United States
Country
Installation or location
Amount
Guam ................................
Naval Com & Telecoms Area MASTSTA
WESTPAC ............................................
$2,250,000
Navy Public Works Center, Guam ............
$16,180,000
Italy ..................................
Naval Air Station, Sigonella ......................
$12,170,000
Naval Support Activity, Naples .................
$24,950,000
Puerto Rico .......................
Naval Security Group Activity, Sabana
Seca .......................................................
$2,200,000
Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads ................
$11,500,000
Total ..................................................
$69,250,000
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition) at the installations, for the pur-
poses, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
Navy: Family Housing
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
California .................
Marine Corps Base,
Camp Pendleton .......
205 units .................
$30,080,000
Marine Corps Base,
Camp Pendleton .......
Community Center ..
$1,438,000
Marine Corps Base,
Camp Pendleton .......
Housing Office ........
$707,000
564
HR 1530 RFS
Navy: Family Housing—Continued
State
Installation
Purpose
Amount
Naval Air Station,
Lemoore ...................
240 units .................
$34,900,000
Pacific Missile Test
Center, Point Mugu .
Housing Office ........
$1,020,000
Public Works Center,
San Diego .................
346 units .................
$49,310,000
Hawaii ......................
Naval Complex, Oahu ..
252 units .................
$48,400,000
Maryland ..................
Naval Air Test Center,
Patuxent River .........
Warehouse ...............
$890,000
US Naval Academy,
Annapolis ..................
Housing Office ........
$800,000
North Carolina .........
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion, Cherry Point ....
Community Center ..
$1,003,000
Pennsylvania ............
Navy Ships Parts Con-
trol Center, Mechan-
icsburg ......................
Housing Office ........
$300,000
Puerto Rico ..............
Naval Station, Roo-
sevelt Roads .............
Housing Office ........
$710,000
Virginia ....................
Naval Surface Warfare
Center, Dahlgren ......
Housing Office ........
$520,000
Public Works Center,
Norfolk .....................
320 units .................
$42,500,000
Public Works Center,
Norfolk .....................
Housing Office ........
$1,390,000
Total: ...............
$230,752,000
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may
carry out architectural and engineering services and con-
struction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $24,390,000.
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States
Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
565
HR 1530 RFS
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A),
the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military
family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$292,931,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to
be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September
30, 1994, for military construction, land acquisition, and
military family housing functions of the Department of the
Navy in the total amount of $2,164,861,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the
United States authorized by section 2201(a),
$445,609,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside
the United States authorized by section 2201(b),
$69,250,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, $7,200,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services
and construction design under section 2807 of title
10, United States Code, $66,184,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
566
HR 1530 RFS
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military
family housing and facilities, $531,289,000.
(B) For support of military housing (in-
cluding functions described in section 2833 of
title 10, United States Code), $1,045,329,000.
(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the cost variations author-
ized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost
of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act
may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appro-
priated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force
may acquire real property and carry out military construc-
tion projects for the installations and locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the follow-
ing table:
Air Force: Inside the United States
State
Installation or location
Amount
Alabama ............................
Maxwell Air Force Base ............................
$3,700,000
574
HR 1530 RFS
to subsection (a) and the interest accrued on these funds
shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury of
the United States.’’.
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE
AGENCIES
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2405(a)(1), and, in the case of the project
described in section 2405(b)(2), other amounts appro-
priated pursuant to authorizations enacted after this Act
for that project, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for
the installations and locations inside the United States,
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
Agency/State
Installation or location
Amount
Ballistic Missile De-
fense Organization
Texas ................................
Fort Bliss ..................................................
$13,600,000
Defense Finance &
Accounting Service
Ohio ..................................
Columbus Center .......................................
$72,403,000
Defense Intelligence
Agency
District of Columbia .........
Bolling Air Force Base .............................
$1,743,000
Defense Logistics
Agency
Alabama ............................
Defense Distribution Anniston ..................
$3,550,000
California ..........................
Defense Distribution Stockton ..................
$15,000,000
DFSC, Point Mugu ...................................
$750,000