H. R. 3304—249 
SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 
POWER OF IRAN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2542) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’ ; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) a description of the structure of Iran’s global net-
work of terrorist and criminal groups and an analysis of 
the capability of such network of groups and how such 
network of groups operates to support and reinforce Iran’s 
grand strategy.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under 
section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010, as so amended, on or after that date. 
SEC. 1233. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT 
TRAINING LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA. 
Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 
U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after ‘‘programs’’ 
the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense pro-
grams’’; and 
(2) in the second sentence, by adding at the end before 
the period the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense 
training’’. 
Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 
SEC. 1241. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON- 
CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES. 
Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 
Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 
‘‘2015’’. 
SEC. 1242. ELEMENT ON 5TH GENERATION FIGHTER PROGRAM IN 
ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOP-
MENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 
Section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(20) The status of the 5th generation fighter program 
of the People’s Republic of China, including an assessment 
of each individual aircraft type, estimated initial and full oper-
ational capability dates, and the ability of such aircraft to 
provide air superiority.’’.
H. R. 3304—250 
SEC. 1243. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES TO RESPOND TO AN ATTACK OR OTHER CONTIN-
GENCY AGAINST UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC FACILI-
TIES OVERSEAS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2014, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State 
and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the posture and readi-
ness of the United States Armed Forces to respond to a request 
by the Department of State to supplement or support existing 
embassy security assets in the case of an attack or other contingency 
against a United States diplomatic facility overseas. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description and assessment of the posture and readi-
ness of the United States Armed Forces that are expected 
or available to be tasked to supplement or support United 
States embassy security, including an assessment of the fol-
lowing: 
(A) Forward deployed assets that are capable of 
responding to an attack or other contingency against a 
United States diplomatic facility overseas. 
(B) Department of Defense support of the efforts of 
the Department of State to improve diplomatic security 
at United States diplomatic facilities overseas (in terms 
of both personnel and installations). 
(C) Potential enhancements of intelligence support to 
ensure that the United States Armed Forces in the vicinity 
of high threat, high risk United States diplomatic facilities 
overseas are in an appropriate posture to respond to an 
attack or other contingency against such facilities. 
(2) A description of any unfulfilled Marine Security Detach-
ment requirements with respect to high threat, high risk United 
States diplomatic facilities overseas, a description and assess-
ment of mitigation efforts to meet such requirements, and 
a schedule for meeting such requirements. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) may be sub-
mitted in classified or unclassified form. 
SEC. 1244. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL 
OPERATIONS FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS. 
(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 
2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 
to establish Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Cen-
ters (RSCCs). 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 
the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional committees 
specified in subsection (c) a report on the following: 
(1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of 
the RSCCs concept. 
(2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the 
establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each 
geographic combatant command, to include how such RSCCs 
or similar entities have been coordinated and de-conflicted with 
existing regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches.
H. R. 3304—251 
(3) The relevance to and coordination with other multilat-
eral engagement activities and academic institutions supported 
by the geographic combatant commanders and the Department 
of State. 
(4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Pro-
gram for RSCCs or similar entities, to include estimates of 
contributions of participating nations. 
(5) Any legislative authorities that may be needed to estab-
lish RSCCs or similar entities. 
(6) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or 
Secretary of State determines appropriate. 
(c) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congressional 
committees referred to in subsection (b) are— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; and 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representa-
tives. 
SEC. 1245. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY 
DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 
(a) REPORT.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 
81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 
239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking ‘‘November 
1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,’’ and inserting ‘‘November 1, 2013, 
November 1, 2015, and November 1, 2017,’’. 
(b) UPDATE.—Section 1236 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(c) UPDATE.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise or supple-
ment the most recent report submitted pursuant to subsection 
(a) if, in the Secretary’s estimation, interim events or developments 
occurring in a period between reports required under subsection 
(a) warrant revision or supplement.’’. 
SEC. 1246. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION 
WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND LIMITATIONS ON 
PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION 
TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the President certified to 
the Senate on February 2, 2011, pursuant to condition (5) of the 
resolution of the Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate 
to the ratification of the Treaty Between the United States of 
America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further 
Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (commonly 
referred to as the ‘‘New START Treaty’’), signed in Prague on 
April 8, 2010, the following: ‘‘The New START Treaty does not 
require, at any point during which it will be in force, the United 
States to provide to the Russian Federation telemetric information 
under Article IX of the New START Treaty, Part Seven of the 
Protocol, and the Annex on Telemetric Information to the Protocol 
for the launch of (a) any missile defense interceptor, as defined 
in paragraph 44 of Part One of the Protocol to the New START 
Treaty; (b) any satellite launches, missile defense sensor targets,
H. R. 3304—252 
and missile defense intercept targets, the launch of which uses 
the first stage of an existing type of United States intercontinental 
ballistic missile (ICBM) or submarine-launched ballistic missile 
(SLBM) listed in paragraph 8 of Article III of the New START 
Treaty; or (c) any missile described in clause (a) of paragraph 
7 of Article III of the New START Treaty.’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) as stated in declaration (1) of the resolution of the 
Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the 
ratification of the New START Treaty— 
(A) ‘‘further limitations on the missile defense capabili-
ties of the United States are not in the national security 
interest of the United States’’; and 
(B) ‘‘[t]he New START Treaty and the April 7, 2010, 
unilateral statement of the Russian Federation on missile 
defense do not limit in any way, and shall not be inter-
preted as limiting, activities that the United States Govern-
ment currently plans or that might be required over the 
duration of the New START Treaty to protect the United 
States pursuant to the National Missile Defense Act of 
1999, or to protect United States Armed Forces and United 
States allies from limited ballistic missile attack, including 
further planned enhancements to the Ground-based Mid-
course Defense system and all phases of the Phased 
Adaptive Approach to missile defense in Europe.’’; 
(2) as stated in declaration (2) of the resolution of the 
Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the 
ratification of the New START Treaty, ‘‘the United States will 
welcome steps by the Russian Federation also to adopt a fun-
damentally defensive strategic posture that no longer views 
robust strategic defensive capabilities as undermining the 
overall strategic balance, and stands ready to cooperate with 
the Russian Federation on strategic defensive capabilities, as 
long as such cooperation is aimed at fostering and in no way 
constrains the defensive capabilities of both sides’’; 
(3) any missile defense cooperation with the Russian Fed-
eration should not in any way limit United States’ or NATO’s 
missile defense capabilities, and should be mutually beneficial 
and reciprocal in nature; 
(4) the United States should not provide the Russian Fed-
eration with sensitive missile defense information that would 
in any way compromise United States national security, 
including ‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for missile 
defense interceptors or target vehicles; and 
(5) the sovereignty of the United States and its ability 
to unilaterally pursue its own missile defense program shall 
be protected. 
(c) LIMITATIONS
ON PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE 
INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.— 
(1) CERTAIN ‘‘HIT-TO-KILL’’ TECHNOLOGY
AND
TELEMETRY 
DATA.—No funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 
made available for fiscal years 2014 through 2016 for the 
Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian 
Federation with ‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for 
missile defense interceptors or target vehicles.