Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DEFAMATION 
JUDGMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Part VI of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘CHAPTER 181—FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘4101. Definitions. 
‘‘4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments. 
‘‘4103. Attorneys’ fees. 
‘‘§ 4101. Definitions 
‘‘In this chapter: 
‘‘(1) DOMESTIC
COURT.—The term ‘domestic 
court’ means a Federal court or a court of any 
State. 
‘‘(2) FOREIGN
COURT.—The term ‘foreign 
court’ means a court, administrative body, or other 
tribunal of a foreign country. 
‘‘(3) FOREIGN JUDGMENT.—The term ‘foreign 
judgment’ means a final judgment rendered by a 
foreign court. 
‘‘(4) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means each of 
the several States, the District of Columbia, and any 
commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United 
States. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:56 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2765.RH
H2765
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
‘‘§ 4102. Recognition of foreign defamation judgments 
‘‘(a) FIRST AMENDMENT CONSIDERATIONS.—Not-
withstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, 
a domestic court shall not recognize or enforce a foreign 
judgment for defamation whenever the party opposing rec-
ognition or enforcement of the judgment claims that the 
judgment is inconsistent with the first amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, unless the domestic 
court determines that the judgment is consistent with the 
first amendment. The burden of establishing that the for-
eign judgment is consistent with the first amendment shall 
lie with the party seeking recognition or enforcement of 
the judgment. 
‘‘(b) JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.—Notwith-
standing any other provision of Federal or State law, a 
domestic court shall not recognize or enforce a foreign 
judgment for defamation if the party opposing recognition 
or enforcement establishes that the exercise of personal 
jurisdiction over such party by the foreign court that ren-
dered the judgment failed to comport with the due process 
requirements imposed on domestic courts by the Constitu-
tion of the United States. 
‘‘(c) JUDGMENT AGAINST PROVIDER
OF INTER-
ACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE.—Notwithstanding any other 
provision of Federal or State law, a domestic court shall 
not recognize or enforce a foreign judgment for defama-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:56 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2765.RH
H2765
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
tion against the provider of an interactive computer serv-
ice, as defined in section 230 of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230), whenever the party opposing rec-
ognition or enforcement of the judgment claims that the 
judgment is inconsistent with such section 230, unless the 
domestic court determines that the judgment is consistent 
with such section 230. The burden of establishing that the 
foreign judgment is consistent with such section 230 shall 
lie with the party seeking recognition or enforcement of 
the judgment. 
‘‘(d) APPEARANCES NOT A BAR.—An appearance by 
a party in a foreign court rendering a foreign judgment 
to which this section applies for the purpose of contesting 
the foreign court’s exercise of jurisdiction in the case, mov-
ing the foreign court to abstain from exercising jurisdic-
tion in the case, defending on the merits any claims 
brought before the foreign court, or for any other purpose, 
shall not deprive such party of the right to oppose the 
recognition or enforcement of the judgment under this sec-
tion. 
‘‘§ 4103. Attorneys’ fees 
‘‘In any action brought in a domestic court to enforce 
a foreign judgment for defamation, the court may allow 
the party opposing recognition or enforcement of the judg-
ment a reasonable attorney’s fee if such party prevails in 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:56 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2765.RH
H2765
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
the action on a ground specified in subsection (a), (b), 
or (c).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters 
for part VI of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘181. Foreign judgments ................................................................. 4101.’’. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:56 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6211
E:\BILLS\H2765.RH
H2765
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 77 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 2765 
[Report No. 111–154] 
A BILL 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit 
recognition and enforcement of foreign defama-
tion judgments and certain foreign judgments 
against the providers of interactive computer 
services. 
JUNE 15, 2009 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:56 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H2765.RH
H2765
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS