datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 907
To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the effect of the parental
exception to the kidnaping prohibition in cases of kidnapings in violation
of valid custody orders.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the
effect of the parental exception to the kidnaping prohibi-
tion in cases of kidnapings in violation of valid custody
orders.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 1201(a) of title 18, United States Code, is
amended by inserting ‘‘(unless such parent’s custody of
such minor at the time of the conduct constituting the
offense is in violation of a court order or decree)’’ after
‘‘except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof’’.
Æ
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 909
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that the Congres-
sional Budget Office prepare an analysis of the job loss or gain that
would result from each reported bill.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
Mr. PAXON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Rules
A BILL
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require
that the Congressional Budget Office prepare an analysis
of the job loss or gain that would result from each
reported bill.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Job Impact Account-
ability Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. CBO JOB ANALYSES.
Section 403(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974 (2 U.S.C. 653(a)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as
paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively, and in para-
graph (4) (as redesignated) by striking ‘‘paragraph
(1) and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1), (2), and
(3)’’; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the follow-
ing new paragraph:
‘‘(3) an estimate of the job creation or loss
which would be incurred in carrying out such bill or
resolution in the fiscal year in which it is to become
effective and in each of the 4 fiscal years following
such fiscal year, together with the basis for each
such estimate;’’.
Æ
to any taxable year only at the time of filing the return
of tax imposed by chapter 1 for the taxable year. The des-
ignation shall be made on the first page of the return or
on the page bearing the taxpayer’s signature.
‘‘(d) ADJUSTED INCOME TAX LIABILITY.—For pur-
poses of this section, the term ‘adjusted income tax liabil-
ity’ means income tax liability (as defined in section
6096(b)) reduced by any amount designated under section
6096 (relating to designation of income tax payments to
Presidential Election Campaign Fund).
‘‘(e) OVERPAYMENTS TREATED AS REFUNDED.—For
purposes of this title, any portion of an overpayment of
tax designated under subsection (a) shall be treated as
being refunded to the taxpayer as of the last date pre-
scribed for filing the return of tax imposed by chapter 1
(determined without regard to extensions) or, if later, the
date the return is filed.’’
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for
such subchapter A is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
‘‘Part IX. Designation for drug abuse education programs.’’
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 
In this Act: 
(1) The terms ‘‘direct costs’’ and ‘‘indirect 
costs’’ have the meanings given such terms in chap-
ter 8 of the Environmental Protection Agency’s 
‘‘Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses’’ 
dated December 17, 2010. 
(2) The term ‘‘energy-related rule that is esti-
mated to cost more than $1 billion’’ means a rule of 
the Environmental Protection Agency that— 
(A) regulates any aspect of the production, 
supply, distribution, or use of energy or pro-
vides for such regulation by States or other gov-
ernmental entities; and 
(B) is estimated by the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency or the 
Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget to impose direct costs and indirect 
costs, 
in 
the 
aggregate, 
of 
more 
than 
$1,000,000,000. 
(3) The term ‘‘rule’’ has the meaning given to 
such term in section 551 of title 5, United States 
Code.
SEC. 5. PROHIBITION ON USE OF SOCIAL COST OF CARBON 
IN ANALYSIS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law or any executive order, the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency may not use the so-
cial cost of carbon in order to incorporate social benefits 
of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, or for any other rea-
son, in any cost-benefit analysis relating to an energy-re-
lated rule that is estimated to cost more than $1 billion 
unless and until a Federal law is enacted authorizing such 
use. 
(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘social 
cost of carbon’’ means the social cost of carbon as de-
scribed in the technical support document entitled ‘‘Tech-
nical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social 
Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Ex-
ecutive Order 12866’’, published by the Interagency 
Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States 
Government, in May 2013, or any successor or substan-
tially related document, or any other estimate of the mone-
tized damages associated with an incremental increase in 
carbon dioxide emissions in a given year. 
Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 
2013. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 1582 
AN ACT 
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Adminis-
trator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
from promulgating as final certain energy-related 
rules that are estimated to cost more than $1 bil-
lion and will cause significant adverse effects to 
the economy.
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1582 
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency from promulgating as final certain energy-related rules 
that are estimated to cost more than $1 billion and will cause significant 
adverse effects to the economy. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 16, 2013 
Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
A BILL 
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency from promulgating 
as final certain energy-related rules that are estimated 
to cost more than $1 billion and will cause significant 
adverse effects to the economy. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Consumers Re-
lief Act of 2013’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:22 Apr 19, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1582.IH
H1582
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FINALIZING CERTAIN EN-
ERGY-RELATED RULES THAT WILL CAUSE 
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE 
ECONOMY. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad-
ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may 
not promulgate as final an energy-related rule that is esti-
mated to cost more than $1 billion if the Secretary of En-
ergy determines under section 3(3) that, with respect to 
the rule, significant adverse effects to the economy will 
be caused. 
SEC. 3. REPORTS AND DETERMINATIONS PRIOR TO PRO-
MULGATING AS FINAL CERTAIN ENERGY-RE-
LATED RULES. 
Before promulgating as final any energy-related rule 
that is estimated to cost more than $1 billion: 
(1) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency shall sub-
mit to Congress a report containing— 
(A) a copy of the rule; 
(B) a concise general statement relating to 
the rule; 
(C) an estimate of the total costs of the 
rule, including the direct costs and indirect 
costs of the rule; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
04:22 Apr 19, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1582.IH
H1582
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SEC. 3. DRUG ABUSE EDUCATION TRUST FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 98 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to trust fund
code) is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:
‘‘SEC. 9512. DRUG ABUSE EDUCATION TRUST FUND.
‘‘(a) CREATION OF TRUST FUND.—There is estab-
lished in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund
to be known as the ‘Drug Abuse Education Trust Fund’,
consisting of any amount appropriated or credited to the
Trust Fund as provided in this section or section 9602(b).
‘‘(b) TRANSFERS TO TRUST FUND.—There are here-
by appropriated to the Drug Abuse Education Trust Fund
amounts equivalent to the amounts designated under sec-
tion 6097 (relating to designation for drug abuse edu-
cation programs).
‘‘(c) EXPENDITURES.—Amounts in the Drug Abuse
Education Trust Fund shall be available for the following
purposes:
‘‘(1) Making grants to States with respect to
drug abuse education programs.
‘‘(2) Payment of the administrative expenses of
the Department of the Treasury directly allocable
to—
‘‘(A) modifying the individual income tax
return forms to carry out section 6097,
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 90
To establish a National Board on workforce skills and to develop a com-
prehensive school-to-work transition program for students in the United
States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 5, 1993
Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To establish a National Board on workforce skills and to
develop a comprehensive school-to-work transition pro-
gram for students in the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workforce Readiness
Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act:
(1) The term ‘‘career guidance counselor’’
means an individual who is certified in career guid-
ance and who assists students with evaluating career
options, opportunities, planning, and decisionmaking
and in seeking and obtaining employment.
(2) The term ‘‘generic skills’’ means cross-in-
dustry, cross-occupation skills which are necessary
for all individuals to have to be effective participants
in the workforce.
(3) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary
of Education.
(4) The term ‘‘school-to-work transition’’ means
the process by which students acquire academic and
occupational skills and work experience to assist in
the transition from school to employment.
TITLE I—NATIONAL BOARD ON
WORKFORCE SKILLS
SEC. 101. ESTABLISHMENT.
There is established a National Board on Workforce
Skills for the 21st Century (in this title referred to as the
‘‘National Board’’).
SEC. 102. PURPOSE.
It is the purpose of this title to oversee the develop-
ment of voluntary national standards that will identify the
generic workplace readiness skills which employers agree
all students should have upon completion of high school
in order to be effective participants in the workforce.
I 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1587 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture 
to issue permits for rights-of-way, temporary easements, or other nec-
essary authorizations to facilitate natural gas, oil, and petroleum product 
pipelines and related facilities on eligible Federal lands, and for other 
purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 16, 2013 
Mr. MARINO (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. REED, and Mr. TUR-
NER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
committee concerned 
A BILL 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 
of Agriculture to issue permits for rights-of-way, tem-
porary easements, or other necessary authorizations to 
facilitate natural gas, oil, and petroleum product pipe-
lines and related facilities on eligible Federal lands, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:13 Apr 20, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1587.IH
H1587
tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IB 
Union Calendar No. 118 
113TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 1582 
[Report No. 113–164] 
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency from promulgating as final certain energy-related rules 
that are estimated to cost more than $1 billion and will cause significant 
adverse effects to the economy. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 16, 2013 
Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce 
JULY 22, 2013 
Additional sponsors: Mr. WHITFIELD, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. BARR, Mr. KLINE, 
Mr. MCKINLEY, and Mr. HARPER 
JULY 22, 2013 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 16, 2013] 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:53 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H1582.RH
H1582
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To protect consumers by prohibiting the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency from promulgating 
as final certain energy-related rules that are estimated 
to cost more than $1 billion and will cause significant 
adverse effects to the economy. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:53 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H1582.RH
H1582
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Consumers Re-
lief Act of 2013’’. 
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FINALIZING CERTAIN EN-
ERGY-RELATED RULES THAT WILL CAUSE SIG-
NIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE ECON-
OMY. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad-
ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may 
not promulgate as final an energy-related rule that is esti-
mated to cost more than $1 billion if the Secretary of En-
ergy determines under section 3(3) that the rule will cause 
significant adverse effects to the economy. 
SEC. 3. REPORTS AND DETERMINATIONS PRIOR TO PRO-
MULGATING AS FINAL CERTAIN ENERGY-RE-
LATED RULES. 
Before promulgating as final any energy-related rule 
that is estimated to cost more than $1 billion: 
(1) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency shall submit 
to Congress a report (and transmit a copy to the Sec-
retary of Energy) containing— 
(A) a copy of the rule; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:53 Jul 22, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1582.RH
H1582
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 911
To encourage the States to enact legislation to grant immunity from personal
civil liability, under certain circumstances, to volunteers working on be-
half of nonprofit organizations and governmental entities.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
Mr. PORTER (for himself, Mr. ANDREWS of Maine, Mr. BACCHUS of Florida,
Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BROWDER, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BUR-
TON of Indiana, Miss COLLINS of Michigan, Mr. COX, Mr. DOOLEY, Mr.
DURBIN, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FROST, Mr. GALLEGLY,
Mr. GILMAN, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. GOSS, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. GUNDER-
SON, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HALL, Mr. HENRY, Mr. HERGER, Ms. NOR-
TON, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of
Texas, Mr. KING, Mr. KLUG, Mr. KYL, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. MACHTLEY,
Mr. MAZZOLI, Mr. MCCANDLESS, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr.
MCDADE, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCKEON, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr.
MOAKLEY, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. PETERSON of Min-
nesota, Mr. PETRI, Mr. PICKETT, Mr. QUINN, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SCHIFF,
Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SKAGGS, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. STARK,
Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. WALSH, Mr. WELDON, Mr. WOLF, and Mr.
MCNULTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the
Committees on the Judiciary and Ways and Means
A BILL
To encourage the States to enact legislation to grant immu-
nity from personal civil liability, under certain cir-
cumstances, to volunteers working on behalf of nonprofit
organizations and governmental entities.
H. Res. 453 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
January 8, 2014. 
Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 
House of Representatives: 
COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Byrne. 
COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Byrne. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
‘‘(B) processing amounts designated under
section 6097 and transferring the amounts to
the Trust Fund, and
‘‘(C) carrying out this chapter with respect
to the Trust Fund.’’
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
for such subchapter A is amended by adding at the end
the following new item:
‘‘Sec. 9512. Drug Abuse Education Trust Fund.’’
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to amounts received after the date
of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
H. Res. 454 
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 
January 8, 2014. 
Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 
hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 
House of Representatives: 
COMMITTEE
ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Ms. Clark of 
Massachusetts. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
I
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 913
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to designate
$1 of their income tax liability and some or all of their income tax
refunds, and to contribute additional amounts, to be used for purposes
of financing drug abuse education programs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-
payers to designate $1 of their income tax liability and
some or all of their income tax refunds, and to contribute
additional amounts, to be used for purposes of financing
drug abuse education programs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voluntary Drug Abuse
Education Checkoff Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF AMOUNTS FOR DRUG ABUSE EDU-
CATION PROGRAMS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 61 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to returns and
records) is amended by adding at the end the following
new part:
‘‘PART IX—DESIGNATION FOR DRUG ABUSE
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
‘‘Sec. 6097. Designation.
‘‘SEC. 6097. DESIGNATION.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Every taxpayer may, with re-
spect to the tax imposed by chapter 1, designate that—
‘‘(1) if such taxpayer’s adjusted income tax li-
ability for the taxable year is $1 or more, $1 be paid
over to the Drug Abuse Education Trust Fund,
‘‘(2) a specified portion (not less than $1) of
any overpayment of such tax be paid over to such
Trust Fund, and
‘‘(3) any cash contribution which the taxpayer
includes with such return be paid over to such Trust
Fund.
‘‘(b) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a joint return
having an adjusted income tax liability of $2 or more, each
spouse may make a designation under subsection (a)(1).
‘‘(c) MANNER AND TIME OF DESIGNATION.—A des-
ignation under subsection (a) may be made with respect
343 
(H) such other countries as the Adminis-
trator determines to be appropriate after pro-
viding notification to the appropriate commit-
tees of Congress. 
(5) 
RESILIENCE.—The 
term 
‘‘resilience’’ 
means— 
(A) the capacity to mitigate the negative 
impacts of crises (including natural disasters, 
conflicts, and economic shocks) in order to re-
duce loss of life and depletion of productive as-
sets; 
(B) the capacity to respond effectively to 
crises, ensuring basic needs are met in a way 
that is integrated with long-term development 
efforts; and 
(C) the capacity to recover and rebuild 
after crises so that future shocks can be ab-
sorbed with less need for ongoing external as-
sistance. 
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this section is to es-
tablish a pilot program to effectively integrate all United 
States-funded emergency and long-term development ac-
tivities that aim to improve food security in the Horn of 
Africa, building resilience so as— 
(1) to reduce the impacts of future crises; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
23:29 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 029200
PO 00000
Frm 00343
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2498.IH
H2498
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 914
AN ACT
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate
certain segments of the Red River in Kentucky as compo-
nents of the national wild and scenic rivers system, and
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red River Designation
Act of 1993’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that—
•HR 914 EH1S
(1) the natural, scenic, and recreational quali-
ties of the Red River in Kentucky are unique and ir-
replaceable resources; and
(2) the majority of the Red River corridor is
within the Red River National Geologic area, which
contains sedimentary rock formations unique to
Kentucky and the United States, and should there-
fore be preserved for public enjoyment.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF RIVER.
Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
‘‘( )(A) RED RIVER, KENTUCKY.—The 19.4-mile seg-
ment of the Red River extending from the Highway 746
Bridge to the School House Branch, to be administered
by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classes:
‘‘(i) The 9.1-mile segment known as the ‘Upper
Gorge’ from the Highway 746 Bridge to Swift Camp
Creek, as a wild river. This segment is identified as
having the same boundary as the Kentucky Wild
River.
‘‘(ii) The 10.3-mile segment known as the
‘Lower Gorge’ from Swift Camp Creek to the School
House Branch, as a recreational river.
•HR 914 EH1S
‘‘(B) There are authorized to be appropriated such
sums as are necessary to carry out this paragraph.’’.
SEC. 4. LIMITATION.
Nothing in this Act, or in the amendment to the Wild
and Scenic Rivers Act made by this Act, shall be construed
as authorizing any acquisition of any scenic easement that
without the consent of such landowner would affect any
regular use of relevant lands that was exercised prior to
the acquisition of such easement.
Passed the House of Representatives October 18,
1993.
Attest:
Clerk.