880 
•HRES 441 EH 
SEC. 2977. MANAGEMENT PLANS. 
(a) COOPERATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT 
PLAN.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the 
Interior shall update and maintain cooperative arrangements 
concerning land resources and land uses on the land with-
drawn and reserved by section 2971. 
(b) PURPOSE.—A cooperative arrangement entered into 
under subsection (a) shall focus on and apply to sustainable 
management and protection of the natural and cultural re-
sources and environmental values found on the land with-
drawn and reserved by section 2971, consistent with the de-
fense-related purposes for which the land is withdrawn and 
reserved. 
(c) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 
A cooperative arrangement entered into under subsection (a) 
shall include a comprehensive land use management plan that 
integrates and is consistent with any applicable law, includ-
ing— 
(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 
(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 
and 
(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 
(d) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of the Navy and 
the Secretary of the Interior shall—
881 
•HRES 441 EH 
(1) annually review the comprehensive land use 
management plan developed under subsection (c); and 
(2) update the comprehensive land use management 
plan as the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of 
the Interior determine to be necessary— 
(A) to respond to evolving management re-
quirements; and 
(B) to complement the updates of other appli-
cable land use and resource management and plan-
ning. 
(e) IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior 
and the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a written 
agreement to implement the comprehensive land use 
management plan developed under subsection (c). 
(2) COMPONENTS.—Such an implementation agree-
ment— 
(A) shall be for a duration that is equal to the 
period of the withdrawal and reservation of land 
under section 2971; and 
(B) may be amended from time to time. 
SEC. 2978. TERMINATION OF PRIOR WITHDRAWALS. 
(a) TERMINATION.—Subject to subsection (b), the with-
drawal and reservation under section 803(a) of the California
882 
•HRES 441 EH 
Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 
(Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4502) is terminated. 
(b) 
LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding 
the 
termination 
under subsection (a), all rules, regulations, orders, permits, 
and other privileges issued or granted by the Secretary of the 
Interior or the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the land 
withdrawn and reserved under section 803(a) of the Cali-
fornia Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 
1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4502), unless incon-
sistent with the provisions of this subtitle, shall remain in 
force until modified, suspended, overruled, or otherwise 
changed by— 
(1) the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of 
the Navy (as applicable); 
(2) a court of competent jurisdiction; or 
(3) operation of law. 
SEC. 2979. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 
The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by 
section 2971 shall terminate on March 31, 2039.
883 
•HRES 441 EH 
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF EN-
ERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AU-
THORIZATIONS AND OTHER AU-
THORIZATIONS 
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF EN-
ERGY 
NATIONAL 
SECURITY 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion. 
Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Secu-
rity Administration. 
Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. 
Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security 
Administration. 
Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator 
for Nuclear Security. 
Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Re-
sponse, and Testing. 
Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the 
replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research 
Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. 
Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options. 
Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into trans-
actions to carry out certain research projects. 
Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold. 
Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 
Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic en-
ergy defense facilities. 
Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nu-
clear weapons stockpile. 
Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stock-
pile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan. 
Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of manage-
ment and operating contracts. 
Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on 
scientific engagement for nonproliferation.
884 
•HRES 441 EH 
Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium ca-
pabilities replacement project. 
Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. 
Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of 
nuclear security enterprise. 
Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such com-
puting into the stockpile stewardship program. 
Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles. 
Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 
Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. 
Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the 
Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. 
Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance. 
Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 
Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion Act. 
Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. 
Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program. 
Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic 
substances and worker health. 
Subtitle A—National Security 
Programs Authorizations 
SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of 
Energy for fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as 
specified in the funding table in section 4701. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.—From 
funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for car-
rying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry 
out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Ad-
ministration as follows:
885 
•HRES 441 EH 
Project 14–D–710, Device Assembly Facility 
Argus Installation Project, Nevada National Secu-
rity Site, Las Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000. 
Project 14–D–901, Spent Fueling Handling 
Recapitalization Project, Naval Reactors Facility, 
Idaho, $45,400,000. 
Project 14–D–902, KL Materials Characteriza-
tion Laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, 
Schenectady, New York, $1,000,000. 
SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense envi-
ronmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as 
specified in the funding table in section 4701. 
SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense 
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding 
table in section 4701.
886 
•HRES 441 EH 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, 
Restrictions, and Limitations 
SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NU-
CLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 
Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘(c) OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT 
CONSISTENTLY WITH CERTAIN PRINCIPLES.—In carrying 
out the mission of the Administration, the Administrator 
shall ensure that all operations and activities of the Adminis-
tration are consistent with the principles of— 
‘‘(1) protecting the environment; 
‘‘(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the pub-
lic and of the workforce of the Administration; and 
‘‘(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, 
nuclear material, and classified information in the cus-
tody of the Administration.’’. 
SEC. 3112. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY 
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF DIRECTOR
FOR COST ESTI-
MATING AND PROGRAM EVALUATION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of the National Nu-
clear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et
887 
•HRES 441 EH 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section: 
‘‘SEC. 3221. DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND PROGRAM 
EVALUATION. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—(1) There is in the Administra-
tion a Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation 
(in this section referred to as the ‘Director’). 
‘‘(2) The position of the Director shall be a Senior Exec-
utive Service position (as defined in section 3132(a) of title 
5, United States Code). 
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—(1) The Director shall be the principal 
advisor to the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of En-
ergy, and the Secretary of Energy with respect to cost esti-
mation and program evaluation for the Administration. 
‘‘(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility 
for receiving or acting on communications from the Director 
with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for 
the Administration. 
‘‘(c) ACTIVITIES FOR COST ESTIMATION.—(1) The Di-
rector shall be the responsible for the following activities re-
lating to cost estimation: 
‘‘(A) Advising the Administrator on policies and 
procedures for cost analysis and estimation by the Ad-
ministration, including the determination of confidence 
levels with respect to cost estimates.
888 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the 
performance baseline for each major atomic energy de-
fense acquisition program. 
‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and 
procedures for developing technology readiness assess-
ments for major atomic energy defense acquisition pro-
grams that are consistent with the guidelines of the De-
partment of Energy for technology readiness assess-
ments. 
‘‘(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments 
for such programs to ensure that such programs are 
meeting levels of confidence associated with appropriate 
overall system performance. 
‘‘(E) As directed by the Administrator, conducting 
independent cost estimates for such programs. 
‘‘(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted 
under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) shall 
be considered an inherently governmental function, but the 
Director may use data collected by a national security labora-
tory or a management and operating contractor of the Ad-
ministration in conducting such a review, evaluation, or cost 
estimate. 
‘‘(3) The Director shall submit in writing to the Admin-
istrator the following:
889 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘(A) The certification of the Director with respect 
to each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted 
under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1). 
‘‘(B) A statement of the confidence level of the Di-
rector with respect to each such review, evaluation, and 
cost estimate, including an identification of areas of un-
certainty, risk, and opportunity discovered in conducting 
each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate. 
‘‘(d) ACTIVITIES FOR PROGRAM EVALUATION.—(1) The 
Director shall be responsible for the following activities relat-
ing to program evaluation: 
‘‘(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and 
procedures for setting requirements for the future-years 
nuclear security program under section 3253 and for 
prioritizing and estimating the funding required by the 
Administration for that program. 
‘‘(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security 
program on an annual basis to ensure that the program 
is accurate and thorough. 
‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and 
procedures for analyses of alternatives for major atomic 
energy defense acquisition programs. 
‘‘(D) As part of the planning, programming, and 
budgeting process of the Administration under sections 
3251 and 3252, analyzing the planning phase of that
890 
•HRES 441 EH 
process, advising on programmatic and fiscal year guid-
ance, and managing the program review phase of that 
process. 
‘‘(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the 
Selected Acquisition Reports and independent cost esti-
mates on nuclear weapons systems undergoing major life 
extension under section 4217 of the Atomic Energy De-
fense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537). 
‘‘(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for 
projects under section 4713 of that Act (50 U.S.C. 
2753) and managing notifications to the congressional 
defense committees of cost overruns under that section. 
‘‘(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) shall 
be considered an inherently governmental function, but the 
Director may use data collected by a national security labora-
tory or a management and operating contractor of the Ad-
ministration in conducting such a review. 
‘‘(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on 
any major programmatic deviations from the future-years nu-
clear security program discovered in conducting a review 
under paragraph (1)(B) at or about the time the budget of 
the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) 
of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year. 
‘‘(e) DATA COLLECTION AND ACCESSIBILITY.—The Ad-
ministrator, acting through the Director, shall, as appro-
891 
•HRES 441 EH 
priate, seek to use procedures, processes, and policies for col-
lecting cost data and making that data accessible that are 
similar to the procedures, processes, and policies used by the 
Defense Cost Analysis Resource Center of the Office of Cost 
Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of 
Defense for those purposes. 
‘‘(f) STAFF.—The Administrator shall ensure that the 
Director has sufficient numbers of personnel who have com-
petence in technical matters, budgetary matters, cost esti-
mation, technology readiness analysis, and other appropriate 
matters to carry out the functions required by this section. 
‘‘(g) REPORTS BY DIRECTOR.—The Director shall sub-
mit to Congress at or about the time that the budget of the 
President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal 
years 2015 through 2018, a report that includes the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(1) A description of activities conducted by the Di-
rector during the calendar year preceding the submission 
of the report that are related to the duties and activities 
described in this section. 
‘‘(2) A list of all major atomic energy defense acqui-
sition programs and a concise description of the status 
of each such program and project in meeting cost and 
critical schedule milestones.
892 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) MAJOR
ATOMIC
ENERGY
DEFENSE
ACQUISI-
TION PROGRAM.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in sub-
paragraph (B), the term ‘major atomic energy de-
fense acquisition program’ means an atomic energy 
defense acquisition program of the Administra-
tion— 
‘‘(i) the total project cost of which is more 
than $500,000,000; or 
‘‘(ii) the total lifetime cost of which is 
more than $1,000,000,000. 
‘‘(B) EXCLUSION OF CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS.—The term ‘major atomic energy 
defense acquisition program’ does not include a 
project covered by Department of Energy Order 
413.3 (or a successor order) for the acquisition of 
capital assets for atomic energy defense activities. 
‘‘(2) PERFORMANCE
BASELINE.—The term ‘per-
formance baseline’, with respect to a major atomic en-
ergy defense acquisition program, means the key param-
eters with respect to performance, scope, cost, and 
schedule for the project budget of the program.’’. 
(2) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 270 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Ad-
893 
•HRES 441 EH 
ministrator for Nuclear Security and the Director of the 
Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of 
the Department of Defense shall jointly submit to the 
congressional defense committees a plan for the imple-
mentation of section 3221 of the National Nuclear Secu-
rity Administration Act, as added by paragraph (1), that 
includes the following: 
(A) An identification of the number of per-
sonnel required to support the Director for Cost Es-
timating and Program Evaluation established under 
such section 3221. 
(B) A description of the functions of such per-
sonnel. 
(C) A plan for training such personnel in co-
ordination with the Office of Cost Analysis and Pro-
gram Evaluation of the Department of Defense with 
respect to the activities described in subsections 
(c)(1) and (d)(1) of such section 3221. 
(D) An estimate of the time required to hire 
and train such personnel. 
(E) A plan for developing cost estimation and 
program evaluation activities jointly with the De-
partment of Defense on strategic system programs 
to the extent practicable and beneficial to both the
894 
•HRES 441 EH 
National Nuclear Security Administration and the 
Department of Defense. 
(3) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 
for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
3220 the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 3221. Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.’’. 
(b) INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATES ON LIFE EXTEN-
SION PROGRAMS AND NEW NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 
4217(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
2537(b)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘for purposes of 
this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘submitted under this 
subsection before October 1, 2015,’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
classified annex if necessary.’’. 
SEC. 3113. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE 
SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the 
Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
895 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MAN-
AGE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec-
retary of Energy may— 
‘‘(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and 
‘‘(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
limit, in whole or in part, the disclosure of information 
relating to the basis for carrying out a covered procure-
ment action. 
‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may exercise the 
authority under subsection (a) only after— 
‘‘(1) obtaining a risk assessment that demonstrates 
that there is a significant supply chain risk to a covered 
system; 
‘‘(2) making a determination in writing, in unclassi-
fied or classified form, that— 
‘‘(A) the use of the authority under subsection 
(a) is necessary to protect national security by re-
ducing supply chain risk; 
‘‘(B) less restrictive measures are not reason-
ably available to reduce the supply chain risk; and 
‘‘(C) in a case in which the Secretary plans to 
limit disclosure of information under subsection 
(a)(2), the risk to national security of the disclosure 
of the information outweighs the risk of not dis-
closing the information; and
896 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘(3) submitting to the appropriate congressional 
committees, not later than seven days after the date on 
which the Secretary makes the determination under 
paragraph (2), a notice of such determination, in classi-
fied or unclassified form, that includes— 
‘‘(A) the information required by section 
3304(e)(2)(A) of title 41, United States Code; 
‘‘(B) a summary of the risk assessment re-
quired under paragraph (1); and 
‘‘(C) a summary of the basis for the deter-
mination, including a discussion of less restrictive 
measures that were considered and why such meas-
ures were not reasonably available to reduce supply 
chain risk. 
‘‘(c) NOTIFICATIONS.—If the Secretary has exercised the 
authority under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 
‘‘(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered pro-
curement action and the basis for the action only to the 
extent necessary to carry out the covered procurement 
action; 
‘‘(2) notify other Federal agencies responsible for 
procurement that may be subject to the same or similar 
supply chain risk, in a manner and to the extent con-
sistent with the requirements of national security; and
897 
•HRES 441 EH 
‘‘(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notifications 
under paragraph (1) or (2). 
‘‘(d) LIMITATION OF REVIEW.—No action taken by the 
Secretary under the authority under subsection (a) shall be 
subject to review in any Federal court. 
‘‘(e) REVIEW
BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF
THE 
UNITED STATES.—Not later than one year after the effective 
date specified in subsection (g)(1), and annually for four 
years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall— 
‘‘(1) review the authority provided under subsection 
(a), including— 
‘‘(A) the adequacy of resources, such as 
trained personnel, to effectively exercise that au-
thority during the four-year period beginning on 
that effective date; and 
‘‘(B) the sufficiency of determinations under 
subsection (b)(2); 
‘‘(2) review the thoroughness of the process and 
systems utilized by the Office of the Chief Information 
Officer and the Office of Intelligence and Counterintel-
ligence of the Department of Energy to reasonably de-
tect supply chain threats to the national security func-
tions of the Department; and
903 
•HRES 441 EH 
by the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on— 
(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not 
be realized during fiscal year 2014; and 
(2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned 
efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed 
stockpile work and nuclear programs accounts. 
(c) AMOUNT SPECIFIED.—The amount specified in this 
subsection is $139,500,000, reduced by the amount the Ad-
ministrator certifies to the congressional defense committees 
that the Administrator has saved through the planned effi-
ciencies realized during fiscal year 2014. 
(d) EXCEPTIONS.—The limitation under subsection (a) 
shall not— 
(1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for 
directed stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Re-
actors; or 
(2) affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy 
under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic En-
ergy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751). 
(e) EFFECT OF PLANNED EFFICIENCIES ON LABORA-
TORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—The im-
plementation of the planned efficiencies may not result in re-
ductions in amounts provided for laboratory-directed research
910 
•HRES 441 EH 
section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall conduct a 
comparative analysis of the feasibility of, and preliminary de-
sign definitions and cost estimates for, each of the following 
life extension options: 
(1) A separate life extension option to produce a 
W78–1 warhead. 
(2) A separate life extension option to produce a 
W88–1 warhead. 
(3) An interoperable W78/88–1 life extension op-
tion. 
(4) Any other life extension option the Nuclear 
Weapons Council considers appropriate. 
(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—None of the funds 
authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated 
or expended for Phase 6.3 (development engineering) activi-
ties for the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Pro-
gram until the date that is 90 days after the Chairman of 
the Nuclear Weapons Council submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report containing the comparative anal-
ysis required by subsection (a).
911 
•HRES 441 EH 
SEC. 3119. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF EN-
ERGY TO ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY 
OUT CERTAIN RESEARCH PROJECTS. 
Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Orga-
nization Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking 
‘‘September 30, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 
SEC. 3120. INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION DESIGN THRESHOLD. 
Section 4706(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 
U.S.C. 2746(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ both 
places it appears and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 
Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 
SEC. 3121. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS 
OF SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FA-
CILITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS 
OF SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FA-
CILITIES. 
‘‘(a) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR SECU-
RITY ENTERPRISE.—(1) Not later than September 30 of each 
year, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of En-
ergy— 
‘‘(A) a report detailing the status of security at fa-
cilities holding Category I and II quantities of special