†
HR 5122 EAS
program, together with a detailed description of the
activities for which such resources were used and an
accounting of how funding for execution was allocated
among the accounts of the Department for recording
as obligations and expenditures.
‘‘(F) A description of any plans to transition the
technologies or prototypes developed as a result of
each program into an acquisition program of the De-
partment.’’.
SEC. 253. POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON TEST AND EVALUA-
TION TO ADDRESS EMERGING ACQUISITION
APPROACHES.
(a) REPORTS ON CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS TO PRO-
CEED BEYOND LOW-RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION.—Section
2399(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para-
graph (6); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol-
lowing new paragraph (5):
‘‘(5) If, before a final decision is made within the De-
partment of Defense to proceed with a major defense acqui-
sition program beyond low-rate initial production, a deci-
sion is made within the Department to proceed to oper-
ational use of the program or allocate funds available for
procurement for the program, the Director shall submit to
†
HR 5122 EAS
the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense com-
mittees the report with respect to the program under para-
graph (2) as soon as practicable after the decision under
this paragraph is made.’’.
(b) REVIEW AND REVISION OF POLICIES AND PRAC-
TICES.—
(1) REVIEW.—The Under Secretary of Defense
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the
Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall re-
view Department of Defense policies and practices on
test and evaluation in order to—
(A) reaffirm the test and evaluation prin-
ciples that guide traditional acquisition pro-
grams; and
(B) determine how best to apply such prin-
ciples to emerging acquisition approaches.
(2) REVISED GUIDANCE.—If the Under Secretary
determines as a result of the review under paragraph
(1) that a revision of the policies and practices re-
ferred to in that paragraph is necessary in light of
emerging approaches to acquisitions, the Under Sec-
retary and the Director shall jointly issue new or re-
vised guidance for the Department of Defense on test
and evaluation to address that determination.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(c) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—In carrying out sub-
section (b), the Under Secretary shall address policies and
practices on test and evaluation in order to—
(1) ensure the performance of test and evaluation
activities with regard to—
(A) items that are acquired pursuant to the
authority for rapid acquisition and deployment
of items in section 806 of the Bob Stump Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note);
(B) programs that are conducted pursuant
to the authority for spiral development in section
803 of the Bob Stump National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law
107–314; 116 Stat. 2603; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note),
or other authority for the conduct of incremental
acquisition programs;
(C) systems that are acquired pursuant to
time-certain development programs; and
(D) equipment that is not subject to the
operational test and evaluation requirements in
section 2399 of title 10, United States Code, but
which may require limited operational test and
evaluation for the purpose of ensuring the safety
†
HR 5122 EAS
and survivability of such equipment and per-
sonnel using such equipment; and
(2) ensure the appropriate use, if any, of oper-
ational test and evaluation resources to assess tech-
nology readiness levels for the purpose of section
2366a of title 10, United States Code, and other ap-
plicable technology readiness requirements.
(d) FUNDING MATTERS.—The Director of the Defense
Test Resource Management Center shall ensure that the
strategic plan for Department of Defense test and evalua-
tion resources developed pursuant to section 196 of title 10,
United States Code—
(1) reflects any testing needs of the Department
of Defense that are identified as a result of activities
under subsection (b); and
(2) includes an assessment of the test and eval-
uation facilities, resources, and budgets that will be
required to meet such needs.
(e) REPORT
TO CONGRESS.—Not later than nine
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report on the review conducted under paragraph (1)
of subsection (b), including any new or revised guidance
issued pursuant to paragraph (2) of that subsection.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(f) TIME-CERTAIN
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM
DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘time-certain development
program’’ means a development program that is assigned
a specific length of time in which milestone events will be
accomplished by contract, which length of time may be not
more than 6 years from milestone B to initial operational
capability.
SEC. 254. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR
THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall pro-
vide for the development of the propulsion system for the
F–35 fighter aircraft (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Joint
Strike Fighter’’) by a means elected by the Secretary from
among the following:
(1) Through the continuing development and
sustainment of two interchangeable propulsion sys-
tems for the F–35 fighter aircraft by two separate
contractors throughout the life cycle of the aircraft.
(2) Through a one-time firm fixed price contract
for a selected propulsion system for the F–35 fighter
aircraft for the life cycle of the aircraft following the
Initial Service Release of the F–35 fighter aircraft
propulsion system in fiscal year 2008.
(b) NOTICE OF CHANGE IN DEVELOPMENT.—The Sec-
retary may not carry out any modification of the procure-
†
HR 5122 EAS
ment program for the F–35 fighter aircraft that would re-
sult in the development of the propulsion system for such
aircraft in a manner other than as elected by the Secretary
under subsection (a) until the Secretary notifies the congres-
sional defense committees of such modification.
SEC. 255. INDEPENDENT COST ANALYSES FOR JOINT
STRIKE FIGHTER ENGINE PROGRAM.
(a) COST ANALYSES.—
(1) ANALYSES REQUIRED.—The Secretary of De-
fense (acting through the cost analysis improvement
group of the Office of the Secretary of Defense), a fed-
erally funded research and development center
(FFRDC) selected by the Secretary for purposes of
this section, and the Comptroller General of the
United States shall each perform three detailed and
comprehensive cost analyses of the engine program for
the F–35 fighter aircraft (commonly referred to as the
‘‘Joint Strike Fighter’’).
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each official or entity per-
forming cost analyses under paragraph (1) shall per-
form a cost analysis of each of the following:
(A) An alternative under which the F–35
fighter aircraft is capable of using the F135 en-
gine only.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(B) An alternative under which the F–35
fighter aircraft is capable of using either the
F135 engine or the F136 engine.
(C) Any other alternative, whether secured
through a competitive or sole-source bidding
process, that would reduce cost, improve program
schedule, and improve performance and reli-
ability of the F–35 fighter aircraft program.
(b) REPORTS.—
(1) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than March
15, 2007, the Secretary, the federally funded research
and development center selected under subsection (a),
and the Comptroller General shall each submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the three
independent cost analyses performed by such official
or entity under subsection (a).
(2) REPORT
ELEMENTS.—Each report under
paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A statement of the key assumptions uti-
lized in performing each cost analysis covered by
such report.
(B) A discussion of the methodology and
techniques utilized in performing each cost anal-
ysis.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(C) For each alternative under subsection
(a)(2)—
(i) a comparison of the life-cycle costs,
including costs in current and constant dol-
lars and a net-present-value analysis, with
the other alternatives under that subsection;
and
(ii) an estimate of—
(I) the supply, maintenance, and
other operations manpower required to
support such alternative;
(II) the number of flight hours re-
quired to achieve engine maturity, and
the year in which engine maturity is
anticipated to be achieved; and
(III) the total number of engines
anticipated to be procured over the life-
time of the F–35 fighter aircraft pro-
gram.
(D) A discussion of the acquisition strate-
gies used for the acquisition of engines for other
tactical fighter aircraft, including the F–15, F–
16, F–18, and F–22 fighter aircraft, and an as-
sessment of the experience in terms of cost, sched-
†
HR 5122 EAS
ule, and performance under the acquisition pro-
grams for such engines.
(E) A comparison in terms of performance,
savings, maintainability, reliability, and tech-
nical innovation of the acquisition programs for
engines for tactical fighter aircraft carried out
on a sole-source basis with the acquisition pro-
grams for tactical fighter aircraft carried out on
a competitive basis.
(F) Such conclusions and recommendations
in light of the cost analyses as the official or en-
tity submitting such report considers appro-
priate.
(3) CERTIFICATION
OF
FFRDC
AND
COMP-
TROLLER
GENERAL.—In submitting the report re-
quired by this subsection, the federally funded re-
search and development center and the Comptroller
General shall each also submit a certification as to
whether the federally funded research and develop-
ment center or the Comptroller General, as the case
may be, had access to sufficient information to enable
the federally funded research and development center
or the Comptroller General, as the case may be, to
make informed judgments on the matters required to
be included in the report.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(c) LIFE-CYCLE COSTS DEFINED.—In this section, the
term ‘‘life-cycle costs’’ includes—
(1) the elements of costs that would be considered
for a life-cycle cost analysis for a major defense acqui-
sition program, such as procurement of engines, pro-
curement of spare engines, and procurement of engine
components and parts; and
(2) good-faith estimates of routine engine costs,
such as performance upgrades and component im-
provement, that historically have occurred in tactical
fighter engine programs.
SEC. 256. SENSE OF SENATE ON TECHNOLOGY SHARING OF
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER TECHNOLOGY.
It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of De-
fense should share technology with regard to the Joint
Strike Fighter between the United States Government and
the Government of the United Kingdom consistent with the
national security interests of both nations.
SEC. 257. REPORT ON BIOMETRICS PROGRAMS OF THE DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress, at the same time as the submittal of the budget
of the President for fiscal year 2008 (as submitted under
section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report
on the biometrics programs of the Department of Defense.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report shall address the fol-
lowing:
(1) Whether the Department should modify the
current executive agent management structure for the
biometrics programs.
(2) The requirements for the biometrics programs
to meet needs throughout the Department of Defense.
(3) A description of programs currently fielded
to meet requirements in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(4) An assessment of the adequacy of fielded pro-
grams to meet operational requirements.
(5) An assessment of programmatic or capability
gaps in meeting future requirements.
(6) The actions being taken within the Executive
Branch to coordinate and integrate requirements,
programs, and resources among the departments and
agencies of the Executive Branch with a role in using
or developing biometrics capabilities.
(c) BIOMETRICS DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘biometrics’’ means an identity management program or
system that utilizes distinct personal attributes, including
DNA, facial features, irises, retinas, signatures, or voices,
to identify individuals.
†
HR 5122 EAS
TITLE III—OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A—Authorization of
Appropriations
SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2007 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for ex-
penses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and main-
tenance, in amounts as follows:
(1) For the Army, $24,795,580,000.
(2) For the Navy, $31,130,784,000.
(3) For the Marine Corps, $3,905,262,000.
(4) For the Air Force, $31,251,107,000.
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $20,106,756,000.
(6) For the Army Reserve, $2,139,702,000.
(7) For the Naval Reserve, $1,288,764,000.
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $211,911,000.
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $2,575,100,000.
(10) 
For 
the 
Army 
National 
Guard,
$4,857,728,000.
(11) 
For 
the 
Air 
National 
Guard,
$5,318,717,000.
(12) For the United States Court of Appeals for
the Armed Forces, $11,721,000.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(13) For Environmental Restoration, Army,
$463,794,000.
(14) For Environmental Restoration, Navy,
$304,409,000.
(15) For Environmental Restoration, Air Force,
$423,871,000.
(16) For Environmental Restoration, Defense-
wide, $18,431,000.
(17) For Environmental Restoration, Formerly
Used Defense Sites, $282,790,000.
(18) For the Overseas Contingency Operations
Transfer Fund, $10,000,000.
(19) For Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams, $372,128,000.
(20) For Overseas Humanitarian Disaster and
Civic Aid, $63,204,000.
SEC. 302. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2007 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
providing capital for working capital and revolving funds
in amounts as follows:
(1) For the Defense Working Capital Funds,
$1,364,498,000.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(2) For the National Defense Sealift Fund,
$1,071,932,000.
SEC. 303. OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS.
(a) DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.—Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2007 for expenses, not otherwise provided for,
for the Defense Health Program, $20,915,321,000, of
which—
(1) $20,381,863,000 is for Operation and Main-
tenance;
(2) $135,603,000 is for Research, Development,
Test, and Evaluation; and
(3) $397,855,000 is for Procurement.
(b) CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUC-
TION, DEFENSE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized
to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for
fiscal year 2007 for expenses, not otherwise provided
for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction,
Defense, $1,277,304,000, of which—
(A) $1,046,290,000 is for Operation and
Maintenance; and
(B) $231,014,000 is for Research, Develop-
ment, Test, and Evaluation.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts authorized to be
appropriated under paragraph (1) are authorized
for—
(A) the destruction of lethal chemical agents
and munitions in accordance with section 1412
of the Department of Defense Authorization Act,
1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(B) the destruction of chemical warfare ma-
teriel of the United States that is not covered by
section 1412 of such Act.
(c) DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVI-
TIES, DEFENSE-WIDE.—Funds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year
2007 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug
Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide,
$926,890,000.
(d) DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.—Funds are here-
by authorized to be appropriated for the Department of De-
fense for fiscal year 2007 for expenses, not otherwise pro-
vided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the De-
partment of Defense, $216,297,000, of which—
(1) $214,897,000 is for Operation and Mainte-
nance; and
(2) $1,400,000 is for Procurement.
†
HR 5122 EAS
Subtitle B—Program Requirements,
Restrictions, and Limitations
SEC. 311. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
THE ARMY LOGISTICS MODERNIZATION PRO-
GRAM.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the De-
partment of Defense by this division and available for the
Army Logistics Modernization Program (LMP), not more
than $6,900,000 may be obligated or expended for the devel-
opment, fielding, or operation of the program until the
Chairman of the Defense Business Systems Modernization
Committee certifies to the congressional defense committees
each of the following:
(1) That the program is essential to the national
security of the United States or to the efficient man-
agement of the Department of Defense.
(2) That there is no alternative to the system
under the program which will provide equal or great-
er capability at a lower cost.
(3) That the estimated costs, and the proposed
schedule and performance parameters, for the pro-
gram and system are reasonable.
(4) That the management structure for the pro-
gram is adequate to manage and control program
costs.
†
HR 5122 EAS
SEC. 312. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR EXHIBITS FOR THE
NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) NATIONAL MUSEUM
OF
THE UNITED STATES
ARMY.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by
section 301(1) for operation and maintenance for the Army,
$3,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of the Army
for education and training purposes to contract with the
Army Historical Foundation for the acquisition, installa-
tion, and maintenance of exhibits at the facility designated
by the Secretary as the National Museum of the United
States Army.
(b) NATIONAL MUSEUM
OF
THE UNITED STATES
NAVY.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by
section 301(2) for operation and maintenance for the Navy,
$3,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of the Navy
for education and training purposes to contract with the
Naval Historical Foundation for the acquisition, installa-
tion, and maintenance of exhibits at the facility designated
by the Secretary as the National Museum of the United
States Navy.
(c) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE MARINE CORPS AND
HERITAGE CENTER.—Of the amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 301(3) for operation and mainte-
nance for the Marine Corps, $3,000,000 may be available
to the Secretary of the Navy for education and training
purposes to contract with the United States Marine Corps
†
HR 5122 EAS
Heritage Foundation for the acquisition, installation, and
maintenance of exhibits at the National Museum of the Ma-
rine Corps and Heritage Center.
(d) NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE UNITED STATES AIR
FORCE.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by
section 301(4) for operation and maintenance for the Air
Force, $3,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of the
Air Force for education and training purposes to contract
with the Air Force Museum Foundation for the acquisition,
installation, and maintenance of exhibits at the facility des-
ignated by the Secretary as the National Museum of the
United States Air Force.
(e) REIMBURSEMENT.—
(1) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT REIMBURSEMENT.—
During any fiscal year after fiscal year 2006, the Sec-
retary of a military department may accept from any
non-profit entity authorized to support the national
museum of the applicable Armed Force amounts to re-
imburse such Secretary for amounts obligated and ex-
pended by such Secretary from amounts available to
such Secretary under this section.
(2) TREATMENT.—Amounts accepted as reim-
bursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to
the account that was used to cover the costs incurred
by the Secretary of the military department concerned
†
HR 5122 EAS
under this section. Amounts so credited shall be
merged with amounts in such account, and shall be
available for the same purposes, and subject to the
same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such
account.
SEC. 313. LIMITATION ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IM-
PROVEMENT AND AUDIT INITIATIVES WITHIN
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not
obligate or expend any funds for the purpose of any finan-
cial management improvement activity relating to the
preparation, processing, or auditing of financial statements
until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense
committees a written determination that each activity pro-
posed to be funded is—
(1) consistent with the financial management
improvement plan of the Department of Defense re-
quired by section 376(a)(1) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law
190–163; 119 Stat. 3213); and
(2) likely to improve internal controls or other-
wise result in sustained improvements in the ability
of the Department to produce timely, reliable, and
complete financial management information.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a)
shall not apply to an activity directed exclusively at assess-
ing the adequacy of internal controls and remediating any
inadequacy identified pursuant to such assessment.
SEC. 314. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR THE MAN-
AGEMENT HEADQUARTERS OF THE DEFENSE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by this
title and available for purposes of the operation and main-
tenance of the management headquarters of the Defense In-
formation Systems Agency, not more than 50 percent may
be available for such purposes until the Secretary of Defense
submits to Congress the report on the acquisition strategy
of the Department of Defense for commercial satellite com-
munications services required by section 818(b) of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Pub-
lic Law 109–136; 119 Stat. 3385).
SEC. 315. EXPANSION OF JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’
TRAINING CORPS PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military de-
partments shall take appropriate actions to increase the
number of secondary educational institutions at which a
unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps is orga-
nized under chapter 102 of title 10, United States Code.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(b) EXPANSION TARGETS.—In increasing under sub-
section (a) the number of secondary educational institutions
at which a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training
Corps is organized, the Secretaries of the military depart-
ments shall seek to organize units at an additional number
of institutions as follows:
(1) In the case of Army units, 15 institutions.
(2) In the case of Navy units, 10 institutions.
(3) In the case of Marine Corps units, 15 insti-
tutions.
(4) In the case of Air Force units, 10 institu-
tions.
SEC. 316. INFANTRY COMBAT EQUIPMENT.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 301(8) for operation and maintenance for the Marine
Corps Reserve, $2,500,000 may be available for Infantry
Combat Equipment (ICE).
SEC. 317. INDIVIDUAL FIRST AID KIT.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 301(8) for operation and maintenance for the Marine
Corps Reserve, $1,500,000 may be available for the Indi-
vidual First Aid Kit (IFAK).
†
HR 5122 EAS
SEC. 318. READING FOR THE BLIND AND DYSLEXIC PRO-
GRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) DEFENSE DEPENDENTS.—Of the amount author-
ized to be appropriated by section 301(5) for operation and
maintenance for Defense-wide activities, $500,000 may be
available for the Reading for the Blind and Dyslexic pro-
gram of the Department of Defense for defense dependents
of elementary and secondary school age in the continental
United States and overseas.
(b) SEVERELY WOUNDED OR INJURED MEMBERS OF
THE ARMED FORCES.—Of the amount authorized to be ap-
propriated by section 1405(5) for operation and mainte-
nance for Defense-wide activities, $500,000 may be avail-
able for the Reading for the Blind and Dyslexic program
of the Department of Defense for severely wounded or in-
jured members of the Armed Forces.
SEC. 319. MILITARY TRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVE-
MENTS AT VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 301(1) for operation and maintenance for the Army,
$2,900,000 may be available to the Virginia Military Insti-
tute for military training infrastructure improvements to
provide adequate field training of all Armed Forces Reserve
Officer Training Corps.
†
HR 5122 EAS
SEC. 320. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR BED-
DOWN OF F–22A AIRCRAFT AT HOLLOMAN AIR
FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO.
The Secretary of the Air Force shall prepare environ-
mental documentation per the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
for the beddown of F–22A aircraft at Holloman Air Force
Base, New Mexico, as replacements for the retiring F–117A
aircraft.
Subtitle C—Environmental
Provisions
SEC. 331. RESPONSE PLAN FOR REMEDIATION OF MILITARY
MUNITIONS.
(a) PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR REMEDIATION.—The
Department of Defense shall set the following remediation
goals:
(1) To complete, by not later than September 30,
2007, preliminary assessments of unexploded ord-
nance, discarded military munitions, and munitions
constituents at all active installations and formerly
used defense sites.
(2) To complete, by not later than September 30,
2010, site inspections of unexploded ordnance, dis-
carded military munitions, and munitions constitu-
ents at all active installations and formerly used de-
fense sites.
†
HR 5122 EAS
(3) To achieve, by not later than September 30,
2009, a remedy in place or response complete for
unexploded ordnance, discarded military munitions,
and munitions constituents at all military installa-
tions closed or realigned as part of a round of defense
base closure and realignment occurring prior to the
2005 round.
(4) To achieve, by a time certain established by
the Secretary, a remedy in place or response complete
for unexploded ordnance, discarded military muni-
tions, and munitions constituents at all active instal-
lations and formerly used defense sites (other than
operational ranges) and all military installations re-
aligned or closed under the 2005 round of defense base
closure and realignment.
(b) RESPONSE PLAN REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2007,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a comprehensive plan for
addressing the remediation of unexploded ordnance,
discarded military munitions, and munitions con-
stituents at current and former defense sites (other
than operational ranges).
(2) CONTENT.—The plan required by paragraph
(1) shall include—
†
HR 5122 EAS
(A) a schedule, including interim goals, for
achieving the goals described in paragraphs (1)
through (3) of subsection (a), based upon the Mu-
nitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol es-
tablished by the Department of Defense;
(B) such interim goals as the Secretary de-
termines feasible for efficiently achieving the goal
required under paragraph (4) of such subsection;
and
(C) an estimate of the funding required to
achieve the goals established pursuant to such
subsection and the interim goals established pur-
suant to subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(3) UPDATES.—(A) The Secretary shall, not
later than March 15 of 2008, 2009, and 2010, submit
to the congressional defense committees an update of
the plan required under paragraph (1). Each update
may be included in the report on environmental res-
toration activities submitted to Congress under sec-
tion 2706(a) of title 10, United States Code, that is
submitted in the year in which such update is sub-
mitted.
(B) The Secretary may include in an update
submitted under subparagraph (A) any adjustment to
the remediation goals established under subsection (a)
†
100
HR 5122 EAS
that the Secretary determines necessary to respond to
unforeseen circumstances.
(c) REPORT
ON
REUSE
STANDARDS
AND
PRIN-
CIPLES.—Not later than March 1, 2007, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report on the status of the efforts of the Department of
Defense to achieve agreement with relevant regulatory agen-
cies on appropriate reuse standards or principles,
including—
(1) a description of any standards or principles
that have been agreed upon; and
(2) a discussion of any issues that remain in
disagreement (including the impact that any such
disagreement is likely to have on the ability of the De-
partment of Defense to carry out the plan).
(d) 
DEFINITIONS.—In 
this 
section, 
the 
terms
‘‘unexploded ordnance’’, ‘‘discarded military munitions’’,
‘‘munitions constituents’’, ‘‘operational range’’, and ‘‘de-
fense site’’ have the meaning given such terms in section
2710(e) of title 10, United States Code.
(e) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 313 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Pub-
lic Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1051; 10 U.S.C. 2706 note) is
repealed.
†
101
HR 5122 EAS
SEC. 332. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO GRANT EXEMP-
TIONS TO CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.
(a) AMENDMENT
TO TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
ACT.—Section 6(e)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(15 U.S.C. 2605(e)(3)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘subpara-
graphs (B) and (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs
(B), (C), and (D)’’;
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘but not
more than 1 year from the date it is granted’’ and
inserting ‘‘but not more than 1 year from the date it
is granted, except as provided in subparagraph (D)’’;
and
(3) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph:
‘‘(D) The Administrator may grant an ex-
emption pursuant to subparagraph (B) for a pe-
riod of up to 3 years for the purpose of author-
izing the Secretary of Defense and the Secre-
taries of the military departments to provide for
the transportation into the customs territory of
the United States of polychlorinated biphenyls
generated by or under the control of the Depart-
ment of Defense for purposes of their disposal,
treatment, or storage in the customs territory of
the United States.’’.
†
102
HR 5122 EAS
(b) SUNSET DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
section (a) shall cease to have effect on September 30, 2012.
The termination of the authority to grant exemptions pur-
suant to such amendments shall not effect the validity of
any exemption granted prior to such date.
(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed
Services and the Committee on Environment and Public
Works of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
of Representatives a report on the status of polychlorinated
biphenyls generated by or under the control of the Depart-
ment of Defense outside the United States. The report shall
address, at a minimum—
(1) the remaining volume of such polychlorinated
biphenyls that may require transportation into the
customs territory of the United States for disposal,
treatment, or storage; and
(2) the efforts that have been made by the De-
partment of Defense and other Federal agencies to re-
duce such volume by—
(A) reducing the volume of polychlorinated
biphenyls generated by or under the control of
the Department of Defense outside the United
States; or
†
103
HR 5122 EAS
(B) developing alternative options for the
disposal, treatment, or storage of such poly-
chlorinated biphenyls.
SEC. 333. RESEARCH ON EFFECTS OF OCEAN DISPOSAL OF
MUNITIONS.
(a) IDENTIFICATION OF DISPOSAL SITES.—
(1) HISTORICAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of De-
fense, in cooperation with the Commandant of the
Coast Guard, the Administrator of the National Oce-
anic and Atmospheric Administration, and the heads
of other relevant Federal agencies, shall conduct a his-
torical review of available records to determine the
number, size, and probable locations of sites where the
Armed Forces disposed of military munitions in
coastal waters. The historical review shall, to the ex-
tent possible, identify the types of munitions at indi-
vidual sites.
(2) INTERIM REPORTS.—The Secretary of De-
fense shall periodically, but no less often than annu-
ally, release any new information obtained during the
historical review conducted under paragraph (1). The
Secretary may withhold from public release the exact
nature and locations of munitions the potential unau-
thorized retrieval of which could pose a significant
threat to the national defense or public safety.