datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
HCON 43 RFS 
Whereas the eleven soldiers were Curtis Adams of South 
Carolina, Mager Bradley of Mississippi, George Davis, 
Jr., of Alabama, Thomas Forte of Mississippi, Robert 
Green of Georgia, James Leatherwood of Mississippi, Na-
thaniel Moss of Texas, George Motten of Texas, William 
Pritchett of Alabama, James Stewart of West Virginia, 
and Due Turner of Arkansas; 
Whereas, despite the bitter cold and snow, the soldiers walked 
10 miles to the town of Wereth, Belgium, where they re-
ceived shelter at the farmhouse of Mathias Langer, a 
resident of Wereth; 
Whereas the eleven soldiers were captured by a German pa-
trol composed of SS soldiers, who, after dark, marched 
the unarmed Americans to a nearby field and brutally 
massacred them; 
Whereas, in 1949, a subcommittee of the Committee on 
Armed Services of the Senate conducted an investigation 
in connection with massacres and other atrocities com-
mitted by German troops during the Battle of the Bulge; 
Whereas the report of the subcommittee identified 12 loca-
tions at which American Prisoners of War, Belgian civil-
ians, or both were murdered during the Battle of the 
Bulge; 
Whereas the massacre of the 11 African-American soldiers of 
the 333rd Field Artillery Battalion in Wereth was omit-
ted from the report, and the occurrence of this massacre 
remains unknown to the vast majority of Americans; and 
Whereas, in 2004, a permanent monument was dedicated in 
Wereth to the 11 African-American soldiers of the 333rd 
Field Artillery Battalion who lost their lives in Wereth 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:17 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC43.RFS
HC43
dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
HCON 43 RFS 
during the Battle of the Bulge to defeat fascism and de-
fend freedom: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That Congress— 
(1) officially recognizes the dedicated service 
and ultimate sacrifice on behalf of the United States 
of the 11 African-American soldiers of the 333rd 
Field Artillery Battalion of the United States Army 
who were massacred in Wereth, Belgium, during the 
Battle of the Bulge on December 17, 1944; and 
(2) calls on the Committee on Armed Services 
of the Senate to correct the omission in the 1949 re-
port of its subcommittee and appropriately recognize 
the sacrifice and massacre of the Wereth 11. 
Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 
2017. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
02:17 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC43.RFS
HC43
dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 46 
Expressing support for the designation of a ‘‘National Purebred Dog Day’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 4, 2017 
Mr. YOHO (for himself, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. ABRAHAM) submitted the fol-
lowing concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Expressing support for the designation of a ‘‘National 
Purebred Dog Day’’. 
Whereas there is currently no day set aside to celebrate and 
acknowledge the contributions of the purebred dog, and 
we wish to designate a day to expressly recognize those 
contributions; 
Whereas purebred dogs are living legacies of the cultures that 
created them, and historically these dogs worked along-
side their people and provided them companionship; 
Whereas today, the service of these breeds continues as they 
work alongside humans and provide inestimable compan-
ionship while serving as guide dogs, service dogs, con-
servation dogs, livestock guardians, search and rescue 
dogs, earth dogs, police dogs, canine soldiers serving by 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:09 Apr 05, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC46.IH
HC46
lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•HCON 46 IH 
the sides of our military men and women, and ultimately 
guardians of family, home, and hearth; 
Whereas purebred dogs have been of enormous help to med-
ical science, serving as models for many heritable human 
diseases, playing a role in humanity’s understanding of 
the human and canine genomes, and benefiting pharma-
ceutical research and development; 
Whereas purebred dogs are working dogs, serving as ava-
lanche dogs, trackers and trailers, herders, controllers of 
vermin, water rescuers, carting and sled dogs, retrievers, 
protectors, hunters, and bird dogs, and always they are 
the heartbeat of a companion near and dear to humans; 
Whereas all dogs should be valued, whatever their ancestry, 
but the purpose-bred dog and the predictability of its 
breed should be cherished and preserved; and 
Whereas each breed is indelibly etched in the history of the 
culture that created it just as surely as that culture’s 
music, art, and language: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That Congress supports the designation of a 
‘‘National Purebred Dog Day’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
00:09 Apr 05, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC46.IH
HC46
lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 48 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla-
tive day from Thursday, April 6, 2017, through Friday, 
April 21, 2017, on a motion offered pursuant to this con-
current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 
2017, 
or 
until 
the 
time 
of 
any 
reassembly
•HCON 48 EH 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which-
ever occurs first. 
SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after con-
sultation with the Minority Leader of the House, shall no-
tify the Members of the House to reassemble at such place 
and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it. 
(b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), 
when the House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant 
to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 
first section of this concurrent resolution. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 2017. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
create and maintain, with respect to any protected health
information the trustee discloses, a record of—
(1) the date and purpose of the disclosure;
(2) the name of the person to whom the disclo-
sure was made;
(3) the address of the person to whom the dis-
closure was made or the location to which the disclo-
sure was made; and
(4) where practicable, a description of the infor-
mation disclosed.
(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than July 1, 1999, the
Secretary shall promulgate regulations that exempt a
health information trustee from maintaining a record
under subsection (a) with respect protected health infor-
mation disclosed by the trustee for purposes of peer re-
view, licensing, certification, accreditation, and similar ac-
tivities.
SEC. 105. SECURITY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Each health information trustee
who receives or creates protected health information that
is subject to this Act shall maintain reasonable and appro-
priate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards—
(1) to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of
the information;
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 48 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 
House of Representatives.
(B) by inserting after clause (vii) the fol-
lowing new clauses:
‘‘(viii) matches performed pursuant to
section 202(x) or 1611(e)(1) of the Social
Security Act; or
‘‘(ix) matches performed pursuant to
section 
205(j)(1)(A), 
205(j)(5),
1631(a)(2)(A)(ii), 
1631(a)(2)(A)(iii), 
or
1631(a)(2)(E) of the Social Security Act;’’.
(2) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section
1611(e)(1)(I)(iv) of the Social Security Act (as
added by section 203(a)(1) of the Personal Respon-
sibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of
1996 (Public Law 104–193) and redesignated by
subsection (d)(1)(B)) is amended further by striking
‘‘(I) The provisions’’ and all that follows through
‘‘(II) The Commissioner’’ and inserting ‘‘The Com-
missioner’’.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made
by this subsection shall take effect on the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Æ
such individual received disability insurance
benefits under section 223 of the Social Secu-
rity Act or benefits under subsection (d), (e), or
(f) of section 202 of such Act based on such in-
dividual’s disability, and
‘‘(B) for any subsequent month during
such taxable year, such individual was not enti-
tled to such benefits solely on the basis of a de-
termination by the Commissioner of Social Se-
curity under section 223(d)(4) of the Social Se-
curity Act that earnings derived by such indi-
vidual from services demonstrated such individ-
ual’s ability to engage in substantial gainful ac-
tivity.
‘‘(2) EARNED INCOME.—The term ‘earned in-
come’ has the meaning given to such term by section
32(c)(2).
‘‘(3) QUALIFYING CHILD.—The term ‘qualifying
child’ has the meaning given to such term by section
32(c)(3).
‘‘(4) CERTAIN RULES TO APPLY.—Rules similar
to the following rules of section 32 shall apply for
purposes of this section:
‘‘(A) Subsection (c)(1)(E) (relating to indi-
viduals claiming benefits of section 911).
III 
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 48 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 
Received 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
Representatives. 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla-
tive day from Thursday, April 6, 2017, through Friday, 
April 21, 2017, on a motion offered pursuant to this con-
current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 
2017, 
or 
until 
the 
time 
of 
any 
reassembly 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:28 Apr 07, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC48.RDS
HC48
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
HCON 48 RDS 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which-
ever occurs first. 
SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after con-
sultation with the Minority Leader of the House, shall no-
tify the Members of the House to reassemble at such place 
and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it. 
(b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), 
when the House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant 
to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 
first section of this concurrent resolution. 
Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 2017. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
22:28 Apr 07, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC48.RDS
HC48
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 531
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the applicability
of the generation-skipping transfer tax.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 4, 1997
Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself and Mr. MATSUI) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the
applicability of the generation-skipping transfer tax.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY OF GENERA-
TION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2651 (relating to genera-
tion assignment) is amended by redesignating subsection
(e) as subsection (f), and by inserting after subsection (d)
the following new subsection:
‘‘(e) SPECIAL RULE
FOR PERSONS WITH
A DE-
CEASED PARENT.—
‘‘(B) Subsection (c)(1)(F) (relating to limi-
tation on eligibility of nonresident aliens).
‘‘(C) Subsections (c)(1)(F)(i) and (l) (re-
lating to identification number requirement).
‘‘(D) Subsection (c)(4) (relating to treat-
ment of military personnel stationed outside the
United States).
‘‘(E) Subsection (e) (relating to taxable
year must be full taxable year).
‘‘(F) Subsection (f) (relating to amount of
credit to be determined under tables).
‘‘(5) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a joint
return, this section shall be applied separately with
respect to the earned income of each spouse.
‘‘(6) PART-YEAR
ELIGIBILITY.—If the period
referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is less than the en-
tire taxable year, the credit allowed under this sec-
tion for such taxable year shall not exceed the
amount which bears the same ratio to the amount
of credit which would be allowed under this section
but for this paragraph as such period bears to the
entire taxable year.
‘‘(e) INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable
year beginning after 1998, each of the dollar
HR 531 IH
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determin-
ing whether any transfer is a generation-skipping
transfer, if—
‘‘(A) an individual is a descendant of a
parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s
spouse or former spouse), and
‘‘(B) such individual’s parent who is a lin-
eal descendant of the parent of the transferor
(or the transferor’s spouse or former spouse) is
dead at the time the transfer (from which an
interest of such individual is established or de-
rived) is subject to a tax imposed by chapter 11
or 12 upon the transferor (and if there shall be
more than 1 such time, then at the earliest
such time),
such individual shall be treated as if such individual
were a member of the generation which is 1 genera-
tion below the lower of the transferor’s generation or
the generation assignment of the youngest living an-
cestor of such individual who is also a descendant of
the parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s
spouse or former spouse), and the generation assign-
ment of any descendant of such individual shall be
adjusted accordingly.
HR 531 IH
‘‘(2) LIMITED APPLICATION OF SUBSECTION TO
COLLATERAL
HEIRS.—This subsection shall not
apply with respect to a transfer to any individual
who is not a lineal descendant of the transferor (or
the transferor’s spouse or former spouse) if, at the
time of the transfer, such transferor has any living
lineal descendant.’’.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) Section 2612(c) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (defining direct skip) is amended by
striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating para-
graph (3) as paragraph (2).
(2) Section 2612(c)(2) of such Code (as so re-
designated) 
is 
amended 
by 
striking 
‘‘section
2651(e)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2651(f)(2)’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to terminations, distributions, and
transfers occurring after the date of enactment of this sec-
tion.
Æ
IV 
115TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 50 
Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Safety Telecommunicators 
Week. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 6, 2017 
Mrs. TORRES (for herself, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. FOSTER, 
Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 
RASKIN, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 
AGUILAR, Mr. PAYNE, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. LOF-
GREN, and Mr. DESAULNIER) submitted the following concurrent resolu-
tion; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Safety 
Telecommunicators Week. 
Whereas the Association of Public-Safety Communications 
Officials (APCO) International and other organizations 
have declared the second week of April as National Pub-
lic Safety Telecommunicators Week; 
Whereas there are over 6,000 public safety call centers, 
known as public safety answering points, in the United 
States; 
Whereas public safety communications professionals dedicate 
their lives to helping others; 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:13 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HC50.IH
HC50
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
•HCON 50 IH 
Whereas public safety communications professionals work 
under challenging and stressful circumstances; 
Whereas public safety communications professionals are an 
important part of the first responder community, pro-
viding critical support to the Nation’s law enforcement, 
fire, and rescue personnel; and 
Whereas public safety communications professionals are crit-
ical to helping preserve public safety and the general wel-
fare: Now, therefore, be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring), That Congress— 
(1) supports the goals and ideals of National 
Public Safety Telecommunicators Week; 
(2) honors and recognizes the importance and 
contributions of the Nation’s public safety commu-
nications professionals; and 
(3) encourages the people of the United States 
to remember the value of the work performed by 
public safety communications professionals. 
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
23:13 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HC50.IH
HC50
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 532
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction
for lobbying expenses in connection with State legislation.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 4, 1997
Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CRANE, Mr.
LAHOOD, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SHAW, Mr.
ABERCROMBIE, and Mr. PICKETT) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore
the deduction for lobbying expenses in connection with
State legislation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DEDUCTION FOR LOBBYING
EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH STATE LEG-
ISLATION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 162(e)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to denial
of deduction for certain lobbying and political activities)
is amended—
HCON 53 RDS 
‘‘(i) veterans constitute not less than 
7 percent of all employees hired by such 
employer during the prior calendar year; 
‘‘(ii) such employer has retained not 
less than 75 percent of the veteran employ-
ees hired during the calendar year pre-
ceding the preceding calendar year for a 
period of at least 12 months from the date 
on which the employees were hired; 
‘‘(iii) such employer has established 
an employee veteran organization or re-
source group to assist new veteran employ-
ees with integration, including coaching 
and mentoring; and 
‘‘(iv) such employer has established 
programs to enhance the leadership skills 
of veteran employees during their employ-
ment. 
‘‘(C) PLATINUM
HIRE
VETS
MEDALLION 
AWARD.—No employer shall be eligible to re-
ceive a Platinum HIRE Vets Medallion Award 
in a given calendar year unless— 
‘‘(i) the employer meets all the re-
quirements for eligibility for a Gold HIRE 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:26 May 04, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC53.RDS
HC53
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
(1) by inserting ‘‘any State legislature or of’’
before ‘‘any local council’’ in the material preceding
subparagraph (A), and
(2) by striking ‘‘such council’’ in subparagraph
(B)(i) and inserting ‘‘such legislature, council,’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The paragraph head-
ing of paragraph (2) of section 162(e) of such Code is
amended by inserting ‘‘STATE OR’’ before ‘‘LOCAL’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ
HCON 53 RDS 
‘‘(3) VERIFICATION.—The Secretary shall verify 
all information provided in the applications, to the 
extent that such information is relevant in deter-
mining whether or not an employer should receive a 
HIRE Vets Medallion Award or in determining the 
appropriate level of HIRE Vets Medallion Award for 
that employer to receive, including by requiring the 
chief executive officer or the chief human relations 
officer of the employer to attest under penalty of 
perjury that the employer has met the criteria de-
scribed in subsection (b) for a particular level of 
Award. 
‘‘(b) AWARDS.— 
‘‘(1) LARGE EMPLOYERS.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 
establish 2 levels of HIRE Vets Medallion 
Awards to be awarded to employers employing 
500 or more employees, to be designated the 
‘Gold HIRE Vets Medallion Award’ and the 
‘Platinum HIRE Vets Medallion Award’. 
‘‘(B) 
GOLD
HIRE
VETS
MEDALLION 
AWARD.—No employer shall be eligible to re-
ceive a Gold HIRE Vets Medallion Award in a 
given calendar year unless— 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 
21:26 May 04, 2017
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HC53.RDS
HC53
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I
105TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 533
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of
frequent flyer mileage awards.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 4, 1997
Mrs. KENNELLY of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify
the treatment of frequent flyer mileage awards.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF FREQUENT
FLYER MILEAGE AND AWARDS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap-
ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended
by redesignating section 138 as section 139 and by insert-
ing after section 137 the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 138. FREQUENT FLYER MILEAGE AND AWARDS.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—If an individual receives a fre-
quent flyer benefit as a result of the purchase in a trade
or business of property or services—
‘‘(1) no amount shall be includible in such indi-
vidual’s gross income by reason of receiving such
benefit,
‘‘(2) no deduction otherwise allowable for the
purchase of such property or services shall be re-
duced by reason of such benefit, and
‘‘(3) no deduction shall be allowed for the por-
tion of any transportation purchased using such a
benefit.
‘‘(b) FREQUENT FLYER BENEFIT.—For purposes of
this section, the term ‘frequent flyer benefit’ means any
right to receive (or the receipt of) air transportation serv-
ices or other benefit for an individual for free or at a re-
duced cost by reason of prior purchases of property or
services. Such term shall include such a right only if the
value of such right is de minimis relative to the cost of
property or services purchased in order to receive such
right.’’
(b) CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT UNDER REIM-
BURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.—Subsection (c) of section
62 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new flush sentence:
‘‘An arrangement shall not be treated as described in
paragraph (2) merely because it permits the employee to
retain a frequent flyer benefit (as defined in section
138(b)).’’
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections
for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code
is amended by striking the last item and inserting the fol-
lowing new items:
‘‘Sec. 138. Frequent flyer mileage and awards.
‘‘Sec. 139. Cross references to other Acts.’’
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
Æ