datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
(1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and 
(g) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol-
lowing new subsection: 
‘‘(e) PROHIBITION
ON PROVISION
OF DECEPTIVE 
CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any 
person within the United States, in connection with 
any telecommunications service or VOIP service, to 
cause any caller identification service to transmit 
misleading or inaccurate caller identification infor-
mation, with the intent to defraud or cause harm. 
‘‘(2) PROTECTION
FOR
BLOCKING
CALLER 
IDENTIFICATION
INFORMATION.—Nothing in this 
subsection may be construed to prevent or restrict 
any person from blocking the capability of any caller 
identification service to transmit caller identification 
information. 
‘‘(3) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 6 months 
after the enactment of this subsection, the Commis-
sion shall prescribe regulations to implement this 
subsection. 
‘‘(4) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub-
section: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:43 Jan 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H251.IH
H251
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
‘‘(A) CALLER
IDENTIFICATION
INFORMA-
TION.—The term ‘caller identification informa-
tion’ means information provided to an end 
user by a caller identification service regarding 
the telephone number of, or other information 
regarding the origination of, a call made using 
a telecommunications service or VOIP service. 
‘‘(B) CALLER IDENTIFICATION SERVICE.— 
The term ‘caller identification service’ means 
any service or device designed to provide the 
user of the service or device with the telephone 
number of, or other information regarding the 
origination of, a call made using a telecommuni-
cations service or VOIP service. Such term in-
cludes automatic number identification services. 
‘‘(C) VOIP SERVICE.—The term ‘VOIP 
service’ means a service that— 
‘‘(i) provides real-time voice commu-
nications transmitted through end user 
equipment using TCP/IP protocol, or a 
successor protocol, for a fee or without a 
fee; 
‘‘(ii) is offered to the public, or such 
classes of users as to be effectively avail-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:43 Jan 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H251.IH
H251
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
able to the public (whether part of a bun-
dle of services or separately); and 
‘‘(iii) has the capability to originate 
traffic to, and terminate traffic from, the 
public switched telephone network. 
‘‘(5) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this Act 
may be construed to affect or alter the application 
of the Commission’s regulations regarding the re-
quirements for transmission of caller identification 
information for telemarketing calls, issued pursuant 
to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 
(Public Law 102–243) and the amendments made 
by such Act.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:43 Jan 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H251.IH
H251
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
imbursement rate under such law or 
plan). 
‘‘(ii) REQUIRED
PAYMENT
ADJUST-
MENT FOR CERTAIN FEES.—The Medicare 
set-aside amount otherwise computed shall 
be reduced by— 
‘‘(I) the amount of the direct 
costs and expenses incurred in estab-
lishing, administering, or securing ap-
proval for the Medicare set-aside; and 
‘‘(II) the proportional share of 
other costs and expenses (including 
fees for attorneys, third-party ven-
dors, and administrators) incurred by 
the claimant or payer in entering into 
the workers’ compensation settlement 
agreement involved. 
‘‘(iii) OPTIONAL
ADJUSTMENT
FOR 
DEEP
DISCOUNT
COMPROMISE
AGREE-
MENTS.— 
‘‘(I) 
IN
GENERAL.—Notwith-
standing clause (i), in the case of a 
deep discount compromise agreement, 
a workers’ compensation claimant or 
workers’ compensation payer who is 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
party to the agreement may elect (but 
is not required) to calculate the Medi-
care set-aside amount of the agree-
ment by applying the denied or con-
tested percentage described in sub-
clause (II) to the unadjusted Medicare 
set-aside amount for the denied or 
contested portion of the claim other-
wise calculated before the application 
of clause (ii). Such election may be 
made by a party to the agreement 
only with the written consent of the 
other party to the agreement. 
‘‘(II) 
DEEP
DISCOUNT
COM-
PROMISE AGREEMENT.—For purposes 
of this subsection, the term ‘deep dis-
count compromise agreement’ means 
a compromise agreement in which the 
present value of the amount included 
in the agreement for the portion of 
the worker’s compensation claim in-
volved that was denied or contested by 
the workers’ compensation payer in-
volved is a percentage of more than 
20 percent, and less than 90 percent, 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
of the amount that could be the 
present value of the denied or con-
tested portion of the claim if the 
agreement provided for the total 
amount that could have been payable 
under the applicable workers’ com-
pensation law or plan involved had the 
denied or contested portion of the 
claim not been subject to a com-
promise agreement. 
‘‘(III) 
APPLICATION.—If 
the 
workers’ compensation claimant or 
worker’s compensation payer elects to 
calculate 
the 
Medicare 
set-aside 
amount under this clause, the Medi-
care set-aside shall be deemed a quali-
fied Medicare set-aside under para-
graph (4)(A) if the amount of the set- 
aside after such calculation satisfies 
the requirement of such paragraph. 
‘‘(3) PROCESS FOR APPROVAL OF QUALIFIED 
MEDICARE SET-ASIDES.— 
‘‘(A) OPTIONAL PRIOR APPROVAL BY SEC-
RETARY.—A party to a workers’ compensation 
settlement agreement that includes a Medicare 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
that is three years after the applicable funding effec-
tive date year (as defined in section 1305 of this 
Act)’.’’. 
(g) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS REGARDING DE-
DUCTION LIMITS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 
801(f) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as re-
designated by paragraph (4), is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and in-
serting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’, and 
(B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2007’’ and 
inserting ‘‘December 31 of the applicable fund-
ing pre-effective date year (as defined in section 
1305 of this Act)’’. 
(2) MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS.—Subsection (f) of 
section 801 of such Act, as redesignated by para-
graph (4), is amended by redesignating paragraph 
(2) as paragraph (3) and by inserting after para-
graph (1) the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS.—Except as pro-
vided in paragraph (3), with respect to multiem-
ployer plans, the amendments made by this section 
shall apply to years beginning after December 31, 
2007.’’. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
05:33 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3868.IH
H3868
cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
HR 251 RFS
‘‘(i) provides real-time voice commu-
nications transmitted through end user 
equipment using TCP/IP protocol, or a 
successor protocol, for a fee or without a 
fee; 
‘‘(ii) is offered to the public, or such 
classes of users as to be effectively avail-
able to the public (whether part of a bun-
dle of services or separately); and 
‘‘(iii) has the capability to originate 
traffic to, or terminate traffic from, the 
public switched telephone network.’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2007. 
Attest: 
LORRAINE C. MILLER, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
02:50 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H251.RFS
H251
hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
IB 
Union Calendar No. 112 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 251 
[Report No. 110–188] 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit manipulation of 
caller identification information, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 5, 2007 
Mr. ENGEL (for himself and Mr. BARTON of Texas) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
JUNE 11, 2007 
Additional sponsors: Mr. INSLEE, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 
BOUCHER, Mr. ENGLISH
of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. 
MCMORRIS
RODGERS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE
of Texas, Mr. SENSEN-
BRENNER, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. DAVIS of 
Kentucky, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. BUYER, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. 
DICKS, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
GILLMOR, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mrs. CUBIN, 
Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CARNAHAN, Ms. ESHOO, 
and Mrs. BLACKBURN 
JUNE 11, 2007 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
A BILL 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit ma-
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
01:01 Jun 12, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H251.RH
H251
bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
III 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. CON. RES. 423 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
MAY 18, 2004 
Received 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for activities 
associated with the dedication of the National World 
War II Memorial. 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring),
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 424
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Honoring past and current members of the Armed
Forces of the United States and encouraging
Americans to wear red poppies on Memorial Day.
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 424
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Whereas the red poppy was the first living plant that sprout-
ed in the battlefields devastated by fighting during World
War I;
Whereas red poppies grew abundantly in the trenches and
craters of the war-torn battlefields in Northern France
and Belgium;
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. 430
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Recognizing the importance of early diagnosis,
proper treatment, and enhanced public awareness
of Tourette Syndrome and supporting the goals
and ideals of National Tourette Syndrome
Awareness Month.
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4429 
To extend the suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 11, 2007 
Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLACK 5. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.91 of the Har-
monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
Reactive Black 5) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:08 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4429.IH
H4429
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
‘‘(I) IN
GENERAL.—The Sec-
retary shall conduct and conclude a 
reconsideration of a determination 
under paragraph (3)(B) and mail the 
notice of the decision of such recon-
sideration by not later than the last 
day of the 30-day period beginning on 
the date that a request for such re-
consideration has been timely filed. 
‘‘(II) APPEALS OF RECONSIDER-
ATIONS.—If a party to the workers’ 
compensation settlement involved is 
dissatisfied with the Secretary’s deci-
sion under subclause (I), that party 
may file an appeal within the 30-day 
period after the date of receipt of the 
notice of the decision under such sub-
clause and request a hearing before 
an administrative law judge. 
‘‘(III) FAILURE
BY
SECRETARY 
TO PROVIDE NOTICE.—In the case of 
a failure by the Secretary to mail the 
notice of the decision under subclause 
(I) by the last day of the period de-
scribed in such subclause, the party 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
247 
HR 6124 PCS
(B) of a variety that is suitable for the 
State in which the seed will be planted; 
(C) rated at least superior with respect to 
quality; and 
(D) specifically approved under a seed es-
tablishment program established by the State 
Department of Agriculture and the State Wheat 
Commission of the 1 or more States in which 
the seed will be planted. 
(2) PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘program’’ means 
the hard white wheat development program estab-
lished under subsection (b)(1). 
(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 
the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the 
State Departments of Agriculture and the State 
Wheat Commissions of the States in regions in 
which hard white wheat is produced, as determined 
by the Secretary. 
(b) ESTABLISHMENT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of 
appropriations, the Secretary shall establish a hard 
white wheat development program in accordance 
with paragraph (2) to promote the establishment of 
hard white wheat as a viable market class of wheat 
in the United States by encouraging production of at 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
22:18 May 27, 2008
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00247
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6124.PCS
H6124
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
requesting the reconsideration may re-
quest a hearing before an administra-
tive law judge, notwithstanding any 
requirements for a reconsideration of 
a determination for purposes of the 
party’s right to such hearing. 
‘‘(ii) HEARINGS.— 
‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—An adminis-
trative law judge shall conduct and 
conclude a hearing on a decision of 
the Secretary under clause (i) and 
render a decision on such hearing by 
not later than the last day of the 90- 
day period beginning on the date that 
a request for such hearing has been 
timely filed. 
‘‘(II) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—A deci-
sion under subclause (I) by an admin-
istrative law judge constitutes a final 
agency action and is subject to judi-
cial review. 
‘‘(III) FAILURE BY ADMINISTRA-
TIVE LAW JUDGE TO RENDER TIMELY 
DECISION.—In the case of a failure by 
an administrative law judge to render 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
a decision under subclause (I) by the 
last day of the period described in 
such subclause, the party requesting 
the hearing may seek judicial review 
of the decision under clause (i), not-
withstanding any requirements for a 
hearing for purposes of the party’s 
right to such judicial review. 
‘‘(6) ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICARE SET-ASIDE 
PROVISIONS; PROTECTION
FROM
CERTAIN
LIABIL-
ITY.— 
‘‘(A) OPTIONAL
DIRECT
PAYMENT
OF 
MEDICARE SET-ASIDE AMOUNT.— 
‘‘(i) ELECTION FOR DIRECT PAYMENT 
OF MEDICARE SET-ASIDE.—With respect to 
a claim for which a workers’ compensation 
settlement agreement is established, a 
workers’ compensation claimant or work-
ers’ compensation payer who is party to 
the agreement may elect, but is not re-
quired, to transfer to the Secretary a di-
rect payment of the qualified Medicare set- 
aside or an annuity purchased to directly 
fund the set-aside amount. With respect to 
a qualified Medicare set-aside paid directly 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
to the Secretary, the parties involved may 
calculate the Medicare set-aside amount of 
such set-aside using any of the following 
methods: 
‘‘(I) In the case of any Medicare 
set-aside deemed a qualified Medicare 
set-aside under paragraph (4)(A), the 
amount calculated in accordance with 
such paragraph. 
‘‘(II) In the case of any Medicare 
set-aside of a deep discount com-
promise agreement under paragraph 
(2)(C)(iii), the amount calculated in 
accordance with such paragraph. 
‘‘(III) In the case of any Medi-
care set-aside, the amount based upon 
the payment amount for items and 
services under the workers’ compensa-
tion fee schedule (effective as of the 
date of the agreement) applicable to 
the workers’ compensation law or plan 
involved, in accordance with para-
graph (2)(C)(i)(I). 
‘‘(IV) In the case of any Medi-
care set-aside, the payment amount 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2402 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased imprisonment 
for certain offenses by public officials. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 21, 2007 
Mr. CARDOZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased 
imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Official Ac-
countability Act’’. 
SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter D of chapter 227 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
21:06 May 23, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2402.IH
H2402
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
‘‘§ 3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses 
by public officials. 
‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In any Federal criminal case 
in which a public official is convicted of an offense against 
the United States— 
‘‘(1) consisting of conduct during the course of 
official duty, intended to enrich that official; and 
‘‘(2) involving bribery, fraud, extortion, or theft 
of public funds greater than $10,000; 
the sentencing judge may increase the sentence of impris-
onment by an amount of up to 2 years. The sentencing 
judge may double the sentence of imprisonment that 
would otherwise be imposed in that case: Provided, how-
ever, That in no instance may the sentencing judge be al-
lowed to increase the sentence by more than 2 years. 
‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘public 
official’ means— 
‘‘(1) an elected official of the United States or 
of a State or local government; 
‘‘(2) a presidentially-appointed official; and 
‘‘(3) an official appointed to a State or local 
governmental office by an elected official of a State 
or local government.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of subchapter D of chapter 227 of title 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
21:06 May 23, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2402.IH
H2402
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item: 
‘‘3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials.’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
21:06 May 23, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2402.IH
H2402
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
110TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 5352 
AN ACT 
To protect seniors in the United States from elder abuse 
by establishing specialized elder abuse prosecution and 
research programs and activities to aid victims of elder 
abuse, to provide training to prosecutors and other law 
enforcement related to elder abuse prevention and protec-
tion, to establish programs that provide for emergency 
crisis response teams to combat elder abuse, and for 
other purposes.
I 
110TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4430 
To extend the suspension of duty on a certain chemical. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
DECEMBER 11, 2007 
Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To extend the suspension of duty on a certain chemical. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 
1. 
2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC 
ACID, 
5-[[4- 
CHLORO-6-[[2-[[4-FLUORO- 6-[[5-HYDROXY-6-[(4- 
METHOXY-2-SULFOPHENYL)AZO]-7-SULFO- 
2- 
NAPHTHALENYL]AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 
YL]AMINO]- 
1-METHYLETHYL]AMINO]-1,3,5- 
TRIAZIN-2-YL]AMINO]- 
3-[[4- 
(ETHENYLSULFONYL)PHENYL]AZO]-4-HY-
DROXY, SODIUM SALT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.44 of the Har-
monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:08 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4430.IH
H4430
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
applicable to the items and services 
under this title as in effect on the ef-
fective date of the agreement. 
Such transfer shall be in accordance with 
a procedure established by the Secretary 
and shall be made only upon written con-
sent of the other party to the agreement. 
‘‘(ii) ELECTION
SATISFYING
LIABIL-
ITY.—An election made under clause (i), 
with respect to a qualified Medicare set- 
aside shall satisfy any payment, in relation 
to the underlying claim of the related 
workers’ compensation settlement agree-
ment, required under subsection (b)(2) to 
be made by the claimant or payer to the 
Secretary. The Secretary shall have no fur-
ther recourse, directly or indirectly, upon a 
workers’ compensation claimant or work-
ers’ compensation payer to the agreement. 
‘‘(B) REQUIREMENT FOR TIMELY NOTICE 
OF MEDICARE REPAYMENTS OWED BY WORK-
ERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMANT OR PAYER TO 
SECRETARY.— 
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 
days after the date on which the Secretary 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
23:51 May 30, 2007
Jkt 059196
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2549.IH
H2549
jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS