379 
‘‘(2) the defense business system has been re-
viewed and certified by the investment review board 
established under subsection (g); and 
‘‘(3) the certification of the investment review 
board has been approved by the Defense Business Sys-
tems Management Committee established by section 
186 of this title. 
‘‘(b) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS IN VIOLATION OF RE-
QUIREMENTS.—The obligation of Department of Defense 
funds for a business system that has not been certified and 
approved in accordance with subsection (a) is a violation 
of section 1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31. 
‘‘(c) ENTERPRISE
ARCHITECTURE
FOR
DEFENSE 
BUSINESS SYSTEMS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense, acting 
through the Defense Business Systems Management Com-
mittee, shall develop— 
‘‘(A) an enterprise architecture, known as the de-
fense business enterprise architecture, to cover all de-
fense business systems, and the functions and activi-
ties supported by defense business systems, which shall 
be sufficiently defined to effectively guide, constrain, 
and permit implementation of interoperable defense 
business system solutions and consistent with the poli-
cies and procedures established by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00379
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
380 
‘‘(B) a transition plan for implementing the en-
terprise architecture for defense business systems. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate responsi-
bility and accountability for the defense business enterprise 
architecture as follows: 
‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion, Technology, and Logistics shall be responsible 
and accountable for the content of those portions of 
the defense business enterprise architecture that sup-
port acquisition activities, logistics activities, or in-
stallations and environment activities of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comp-
troller) shall be responsible and accountable for the 
content of those portions of the defense business enter-
prise architecture that support financial management 
activities or strategic planning and budgeting activi-
ties of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Per-
sonnel and Readiness shall be responsible and ac-
countable for the content of those portions of the de-
fense business enterprise architecture that support 
human resource management activities of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00380
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
381 
‘‘(D) The Chief Information Officer of the De-
partment of Defense shall be responsible and account-
able for the content of those portions of the defense 
business enterprise architecture that support informa-
tion technology infrastructure or information assur-
ance activities of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(E) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of 
the Department of Defense shall be responsible and 
accountable for developing and maintaining the de-
fense business enterprise architecture as well as inte-
grating business operations covered by subparagraphs 
(A) through (D). 
‘‘(d) 
COMPOSITION
OF
ENTERPRISE
ARCHITEC-
TURE.—The defense business enterprise architecture devel-
oped under subsection (c)(1)(A) shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) An information infrastructure that, at a 
minimum, would enable the Department of Defense 
to— 
‘‘(A) comply with applicable law, including 
Federal accounting, financial management, and 
reporting requirements; 
‘‘(B) routinely produce timely, accurate, 
and reliable business and financial information 
for management purposes; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00381
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
382 
‘‘(C) integrate budget, accounting, and pro-
gram information and systems; and 
‘‘(D) provide for the systematic measure-
ment of performance, including the ability to 
produce timely, relevant, and reliable cost infor-
mation. 
‘‘(2) Policies, procedures, data standards, per-
formance measures, and system interface requirements 
that are to apply uniformly throughout the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
‘‘(3) A defense business systems computing envi-
ronment integrated into the defense business enter-
prise architecture for the major business processes 
conducted by the Department of Defense, as deter-
mined by the Chief Management Officer. 
‘‘(e) COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN.—(1) The 
transition plan developed under subsection (c)(1)(B) shall 
include the following: 
‘‘(A) A listing of the additional systems that are 
expected to be needed to complete the defense business 
enterprise architecture, along with each system’s time- 
phased milestones, performance measures, financial 
resource needs, and risks or challenges to integration 
into the business enterprise architecture. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00382
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
383 
‘‘(B) A listing of the defense business systems as 
of December 2, 2002 (known as ‘legacy systems’), that 
will not be part of the defense business enterprise ar-
chitecture, together with the schedule for terminating 
those legacy systems that provides for reducing the use 
of those legacy systems in phases. 
‘‘(C) A listing of the legacy systems (referred to 
in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the de-
fense business systems computing environment de-
scribed in subsection (d)(3), together with a strategy 
for making the modifications to those systems that 
will be needed to ensure that such systems comply 
with the defense business enterprise architecture. 
‘‘(2) Each of the strategies under paragraph (1) shall 
include specific time-phased milestones, performance meas-
ures, and a statement of the financial and nonfinancial re-
source needs. 
‘‘(f) APPROPRIATE
PRE-CERTIFICATION
AUTHORI-
TIES.—For purposes of subsection (a), the appropriate pre- 
certification authority for a defense business system is as 
follows: 
‘‘(1) In the case of an Army program, the Chief 
Management Officer of the Army. 
‘‘(2) In the case of a Navy program, the Chief 
Management Officer of the Navy. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00383
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
384 
‘‘(3) In the case of an Air Force program, the 
Chief Management Officer of the Air Force. 
‘‘(4) In the case of a program of a Defense Agen-
cy, the Director, or equivalent, of that Defense Agency 
unless otherwise approved by the Deputy Chief Man-
agement Officer. 
‘‘(5) In the case of a program that will support 
the business processes of more than one military de-
partment or Defense Agency, an appropriate pre-cer-
tification authority designated by the Deputy Chief 
Management Officer. 
‘‘(g) DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM INVESTMENT RE-
VIEW.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall require the Dep-
uty Chief Management Officer, not later than October 1, 
2011, to establish an investment review board and invest-
ment management process, consistent with section 11312 of 
title 40, to review the planning, design, acquisition, devel-
opment, deployment, operation, maintenance, moderniza-
tion, and project cost benefits and risks of all defense busi-
ness systems. The investment review board and investment 
management process so established shall specifically address 
the requirements of subsection (a). 
‘‘(2) The review of defense business systems under the 
investment management process shall include the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00384
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
385 
‘‘(A) Review and approval by the investment re-
view board of each defense business system before the 
obligation of funds on the system in accordance with 
the requirements of subsection (a). 
‘‘(B) Periodic review, but not less often than an-
nually, of all defense business systems, grouped in 
portfolios of defense business systems. 
‘‘(C) Representation on the investment review 
board by appropriate officials from among the Office 
of the Secretary of Defense, the armed forces, the com-
batant commands, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the 
Defense Agencies, including the Under Secretaries of 
Defense, the Chief Information Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense, and the Chief Management Officers 
of the military departments. 
‘‘(D) Use of threshold criteria to ensure an ap-
propriate level of review within the Department of 
Defense of, and accountability for, defense business 
systems depending on scope, complexity, and cost. 
‘‘(E) Use of procedures for making certifications 
in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a). 
‘‘(F) Use of procedures for ensuring consistency 
with the guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense 
and the Defense Business Systems Management Com-
mittee, as required by section 186(c) of this title, and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00385
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
386 
incorporation of common decision criteria, including 
standards, requirements, and priorities that result in 
the integration of defense business systems. 
‘‘(h) BUDGET INFORMATION.—In the materials that 
the Secretary submits to Congress in support of the budget 
submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for fis-
cal year 2006 and fiscal years thereafter, the Secretary of 
Defense shall include the following information: 
‘‘(1) Identification of each defense business sys-
tem for which funding is proposed in that budget. 
‘‘(2) Identification of all funds, by appropria-
tion, proposed in that budget for each such system, 
including— 
‘‘(A) funds for current services (to operate 
and maintain the system); and 
‘‘(B) funds for business systems moderniza-
tion, identified for each specific appropriation. 
‘‘(3) For each such system, identification of the 
appropriate pre-certification authority under sub-
section (f). 
‘‘(4) For each such system, a description of each 
approval made under subsection (a)(3) with regard to 
such system. 
‘‘(i) CONGRESSIONAL
REPORTS.—Not later than 
March 15 of each year from 2012 through 2016, the Sec-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00386
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
387 
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on Department of Defense compliance 
with the requirements of this section. The report shall— 
‘‘(1) describe actions taken and planned for 
meeting the requirements of subsection (a), includ-
ing— 
‘‘(A) specific milestones and actual perform-
ance against specified performance measures, 
and any revision of such milestones and per-
formance measures; and 
‘‘(B) specific actions on the defense business 
systems submitted for certification under such 
subsection; 
‘‘(2) identify the number of defense business sys-
tems so certified; 
‘‘(3) identify any defense business system during 
the preceding fiscal year that was not certified under 
subsection (a), and the reasons for the lack of certifi-
cation; 
‘‘(4) discuss specific improvements in business 
operations and cost savings resulting from successful 
defense business systems implementation or mod-
ernization efforts; and 
‘‘(5) include a copy of the most recent report of 
the Chief Management Officer of each military de-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00387
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
388 
partment on implementation of business trans-
formation initiatives by such department in accord-
ance with section 908 of the Duncan Hunter National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub-
lic Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 
note). 
‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘pre-certification authority’, with 
respect to a defense business system, means the De-
partment of Defense official responsible for the defense 
business system, as designated by subsection (f). 
‘‘(2) The term ‘defense business system’ means an 
information system, other than a national security 
system, operated by, for, or on behalf of the Depart-
ment of Defense, including financial systems, mixed 
systems, financial data feeder systems, and informa-
tion technology and information assurance infrastruc-
ture, used to support business activities, such as ac-
quisition, financial management, logistics, strategic 
planning and budgeting, installations and environ-
ment, and human resource management. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘enterprise architecture’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 
44. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00388
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
389 
‘‘(4) The terms ‘information system’ and ‘infor-
mation technology’ have the meanings given those 
terms in section 11101 of title 40. 
‘‘(5) The term ‘national security system’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 
44.’’. 
SEC. 902. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
AND MARINE CORPS. 
(a) REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
CORPS.— 
(1) REDESIGNATION
OF
MILITARY
DEPART-
MENT.—The military department designated as the 
Department of the Navy is redesignated as the De-
partment of the Navy and Marine Corps. 
(2) REDESIGNATION OF SECRETARY AND OTHER 
STATUTORY OFFICES.— 
(A) SECRETARY.—The position of the Sec-
retary of the Navy is redesignated as the Sec-
retary of the Navy and Marine Corps. 
(B) OTHER STATUTORY OFFICES.—The po-
sitions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the 
four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the 
General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00389
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
390 
are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the 
Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secre-
taries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the 
General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps, respectively. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10, UNITED 
STATES CODE.— 
(1) DEFINITION OF ‘‘MILITARY DEPARTMENT’’.— 
Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(8) The term ‘military department’ means the 
Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air 
Force.’’. 
(2) ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENT.—The text 
of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as fol-
lows: ‘‘The Department of the Navy and Marine 
Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of 
the Navy and Marine Corps.’’. 
(3) 
POSITION
OF
SECRETARY.—Section 
5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘There 
is a Secretary of the Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘There is 
a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps’’. 
(4) CHAPTER HEADINGS.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00390
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
391 
(A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘CHAPTER 503—DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS’’. 
(B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘CHAPTER 507—COMPOSITION OF THE DE-
PARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
CORPS’’. 
(5) OTHER AMENDMENTS.— 
(A) Title 10, United States Code, is amend-
ed by striking ‘‘Department of the Navy’’ and 
‘‘Secretary of the Navy’’ each place they appear 
other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), 
(3), and (4) (including in section headings, sub-
section captions, tables of chapters, and tables of 
sections) and inserting ‘‘Department of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’, respectively, in each case 
with the matter inserted to be in the same type-
face and typestyle as the matter stricken. 
(B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 
5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are 
amended by striking ‘‘Assistant Secretaries of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00391
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
392 
Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretaries of 
the Navy and Marine Corps’’. 
(ii) The heading of section 5016 of such 
title, and the item relating to such section in the 
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 
of such title, are each amended by inserting ‘‘and 
Marine Corps’’ after ‘‘of the Navy’’, with the 
matter inserted in each case to be in the same 
typeface and typestyle as the matter amended. 
(c) OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW AND OTHER REF-
ERENCES.— 
(1) TITLE 37, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 37, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Depart-
ment of the Navy’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy’’ each 
place they appear and inserting ‘‘Department of the 
Navy and Marine Corps’’ and ‘‘Secretary of the Navy 
and Marine Corps’’, respectively. 
(2) OTHER REFERENCES.—Any reference in any 
law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States 
Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States, to the Department of the 
Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the De-
partment of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such 
reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00392
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
393 
shall be considered to be a reference to that office as 
redesignated by that section. 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend-
ments made by this section shall take effect on the first day 
of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
SEC. 911. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR HARMFUL IN-
TERFERENCE TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. 
(a) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—Upon a determination 
by the Secretary of Defense that a commercial communica-
tions service will cause or is causing widespread harmful 
interference with Global Positioning System receivers used 
by the Department of Defense, the Secretary shall submit 
to Congress notice of such determination. 
(b) CONTENTS.—The notice required under subsection 
(a) shall include— 
(1) a summary of the reasons that a commercial 
communications service will cause or is causing 
harmful interference with Global Positioning System 
receivers used by the Department of Defense; 
(2) a description of the entity that will cause or 
is causing such harmful interference; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00393
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
394 
(3) a description of the magnitude and duration 
of such harmful interference or the potential mag-
nitude and duration of such harmful interference; and 
(4) a summary of the Secretary’s plans for ad-
dressing such harmful interference. 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related 
Matters 
SEC. 921. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDA-
TIONS BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL ON 
INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION SHARING. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the 
Comptroller General a report on actions taken by the Sec-
retary in response to the recommendations of the Comp-
troller General in the report issued on January 22, 2010, 
titled ‘‘Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: Es-
tablishing Guidance, Timelines, and Accountability for In-
tegrating Intelligence Data Would Improve Information 
Sharing’’ (GAO-10-265NI), regarding the need to develop 
guidance, such as a concept of operations, to provide over-
arching direction and priorities for sharing intelligence in-
formation across the defense elements of the intelligence 
community. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00394
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
395 
(b) REVIEW OF REPORT.—The Comptroller General 
shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
review of the report submitted under subsection (a), includ-
ing a determination by the Comptroller General as to 
whether the actions taken by the Secretary of Defense in 
response to the recommendations referred to in such sub-
section are consistent with and adequately address such rec-
ommendations. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; 
(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives; and 
(3) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
Senate. 
SEC. 922. INSIDER THREAT DETECTION. 
(a) PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall establish a program for information sharing protec-
tion and insider threat mitigation for the information sys-
tems of the Department of Defense to detect unauthorized 
access to, use of, or transmission of classified or controlled 
unclassified information. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The program established under sub-
section (a) shall include the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00395
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
396 
(1) Technology solutions for deployment within 
the Department of Defense that allow for centralized 
monitoring and detection of unauthorized activities, 
including— 
(A) monitoring the use of external ports and 
read and write capability controls; 
(B) auditing unusual and unauthorized 
user activities; 
(C) a roles-based access certification system; 
(D) cross-domain guards for transfers of in-
formation between different networks; and 
(E) patch management for software and se-
curity updates. 
(2) Policies and procedures to support such pro-
gram, including special consideration for policies and 
procedures related to international and interagency 
partners and activities in support of ongoing oper-
ations in areas of hostilities. 
(3) A governance structure and process that inte-
grates information security and sharing technologies 
with the policies and procedures referred to in para-
graph (2). Such structure and process shall include— 
(A) coordination with the existing security 
clearance and suitability review process; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00396
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
397 
(B) coordination of existing anomaly detec-
tion techniques, including those used in counter-
intelligence investigation or personnel screening 
activities; and 
(C) updating and expediting of the classi-
fication review and marking process. 
(4) A continuing analysis of— 
(A) gaps in security measures under the 
program; and 
(B) technology, policies, and processes need-
ed to increase the capability of the program be-
yond the initially established full operating ca-
pability to address such gaps. 
(5) A baseline analysis framework that includes 
measures of performance and effectiveness. 
(6) A plan for how to ensure related security 
measures are put in place for other departments or 
agencies with access to Department of Defense net-
works. 
(7) A plan for enforcement to ensure that the 
program is being applied and implemented on a uni-
form and consistent basis. 
(c) OPERATING CAPABILITY.—The Secretary shall en-
sure the program established under subsection (a)— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
21:02 May 17, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00397
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H1540.RH
H1540
tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS