project, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$19,002,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$19,002,000. 
(7) MATILIJA DAM, VENTURA COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—The project for ecosystem restoration, 
Matilija Dam and Ventura River Watershed, Ven-
tura County, California: Report of the Chief of En-
gineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of 
$130,335,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$78,973,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$51,362,000. 
(8) MIDDLE
CREEK, LAKE
COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—The project for ecosystem restoration and 
flood damage reduction, Middle Creek, Lake County, 
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $41,793,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $27,256,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,537,000. 
(9) NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH, CALIFORNIA.—
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The project for eco-
system restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh, 
Nap River, California: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $100,500,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $64,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $36,500,000. 
(B) PROJECT FEATURES.—In carrying out 
the project, the Secretary shall include con-
struction of a recycled water pipeline extending 
from the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation Dis-
trict Waste Water Treatment Plant and the 
Napa Sanitation District Waste Water Treat-
ment Plant as part of the project and restora-
tion and enhancement of Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, 
and 3. 
(10) SOUTH
PLATTE
RIVER, DENVER, COLO-
RADO.—The project for environmental restoration 
Denver County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, 
Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $18,824,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $12,236,000 and an es-
timated non-Federal cost of $6,588,000. 
(11) MIAMI
HARBOR, MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for naviga-
tion, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Flor-
ida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
April 25, 2005, at a total cost of $121,127,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $64,843,000
and 
an 
estimated 
non-Federal 
cost 
of 
$56,284,000. 
(B) GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT.—
The non-Federal share of the cost of the gen-
eral reevaluation report that resulted in the re-
port of the Chief of Engineers referred to in 
subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage 
as the non-Federal share of cost of construction 
of the project. 
(C) AGREEMENT.—The Secretary shall 
enter into a new partnership with the non-Fed-
eral interest to reflect the cost sharing required 
by subparagraph (B). 
(12) EAST
ST. LOUIS
AND
VICINITY, ILLI-
NOIS.—The project for ecosystem restoration, East 
St. Louis and vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $191,158,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $123,807,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $67,351,000. 
(13) PEORIA
RIVERFRONT, 
ILLINOIS.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Peoria River-
front, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost of $16,000,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $10,400,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,600,000. 
(14) BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LOUISIANA.—The 
project for navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Lou-
isiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Janu-
ary 3, 2005, at a total cost of $9,000,000. The costs 
of construction of the project shall be paid 1⁄2 from 
amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
Treasury and 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from 
the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
(15) MORGANZA
TO
THE
GULF
OF
MEXICO, 
LOUISIANA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for hurri-
cane and storm damage reduction, Morganza to 
the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the 
Chief of Engineers, dated August 23, 2002, and 
July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $788,000,000 
with an estimated Federal cost of $512,200,000 
and 
an 
estimated 
non-Federal 
cost 
of 
$275,800,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of design and construction work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the
project if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the project. 
(16) SWOPE
PARK
INDUSTRIAL
AREA, MIS-
SOURI.—The project for flood damage reduction, 
Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: Report of the 
Chief of Engineers, dated December 30, 2003, at a 
total cost of $15,683,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $10,194,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $5,489,000. 
(17) MANASQUAN TO BARNEGAT INLET, NEW 
JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and storm dam-
age reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat Inlet, New 
Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated De-
cember 30, 2003, at a total cost of $65,800,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $42,800,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,000,000, and 
at an estimated total cost of $108,000,000 for peri-
odic beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
project, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$54,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$54,000,000. 
(18) SOUTH RIVER, NEW JERSEY.—The project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction and envi-
ronmental restoration, South River, New Jersey: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003,