I
106TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. R. 2244
To prohibit United States assistance to the Republic of Panama if a defense
site or military installation built or formerly operated by the United
States has been conveyed by the Government of the Republic of Panama
to any foreign government-owned entity, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 16, 1999
Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committees on
Banking and Financial Services, Armed Services, and Intelligence (Per-
manent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speak-
er, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the ju-
risdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To prohibit United States assistance to the Republic of Pan-
ama if a defense site or military installation built or
formerly operated by the United States has been con-
veyed by the Government of the Republic of Panama
to any foreign government-owned entity, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States-Panama
Security Act of 1999’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States secured the independence
of the Republic of Panama, built the Panama Canal
at considerable cost in blood and treasure, and has
provided for its management, operations, mainte-
nance, improvement, and defense throughout the
20th century, providing a vital service to the peace-
ful commerce of all nations as well as substantial re-
turns to the national interests of both the United
States and Panama.
(2) The Panama Canal continues to play a vital
role both in international trade and in the national
security of the United States, reducing the distance
by sea between New York and San Francisco by
some 8,000 miles, contributing critical strategic mo-
bility to naval forces of the United States and sub-
stantial savings to maritime commerce.
(3) Absent any new base-rights agreement be-
tween the United States Government and the Gov-
ernment of the Republic of Panama allowing for a
post-2000 United States military presence, United
States forces in Panama will be reduced to zero by
December 31, 1999, calling into question the ability
of the United States to continue to protect its inter-
ests in the area.
(4) The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doc-
trine proclaimed in 1904 that it was a national secu-
rity concern of the United States when foreign pow-
ers attempted to use public or private investment as
a vehicle for the expansion of political and military
influence in the Western Hemisphere.
(5) The recent grant to Hutchison Whampoa, a
Chinese firm with ties to the Government of the
People’s Republic of China, of management control
of the Panamanian ports of Balboa and San Cris-
tobal, located at either end of the Panama Canal,
has raised the specter of the expansion of Chinese
political influence in Panama—a situation aggra-
vated by unanswered questions concerning the meth-
ods used by the Chinese firm to win its bids.
(6) In addition, Article V of the Treaty Con-
cerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of
the Panama Canal, states that only the Republic of
Panama shall maintain military forces, defense sites,
and military installations in its national territory
after December 31, 1999.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO THE REPUBLIC OF
PANAMA IF FORMER UNITED STATES MILI-
TARY FACILITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF PAN-
AMA ARE CONVEYED TO ANY FOREIGN GOV-
ERNMENT-OWNED ENTITY.
(a) LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE.—
United States assistance may not be provided to the Re-
public of Panama for any period of time beginning after
the date of the enactment of this Act during which a de-
fense site or military installation, that is located within
the territory of the Republic of Panama and that was at
any time part of a defense site or military installation built
or formerly operated by the United States, has been con-
veyed by the Government of the Republic of Panama to
any foreign government-owned entity.
(b) OPPOSITION
TO
ASSISTANCE
FROM
INTER-
NATIONAL
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS.—The President
shall instruct the United States representative to each
international financial institution to which the United
States is a member to use the voice and vote of the United
States to oppose any loans or other forms of assistance
from that institution to the Republic of Panama for any
period of time during which the Government of the Repub-
lic of Panama is in violation of the requirements of sub-
section (a).
SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) REPORT BY THE PRESIDENT.—Not later than 60
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Presi-
dent shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a report
containing a description of how Hutchison Whampoa, a
Chinese firm with ties to the Government of the People’s
Republic of China, was selected to receive a grant for man-
agement control of the Panamanian ports of Balboa and
San Cristobal, located at either end of the Panama Canal,
including whether or not the United States Government—
(1) had any information concerning the bid by
Hutchison Whampoa to receive such grant;
(2) provided adequate support to bids by
United States firms for such grant; and
(3) had any knowledge of ties that exist be-
tween Hutchison Whampoa and the Government of
the People’s Republic of China.
(b) REPORT BY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Not
later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prepare and submit
to the Congress a report containing—
(1) a description of the extent to which the con-
trol of the ports San Cristobal and Balboa in the
Republic of Panama by Hutchison Whampoa, a Chi-
nese firm with ties to the Government of the Peo-
ple’s Republic of China, poses a threat to the secu-
rity of the United States; and
(2) a description of how the strategic interests
of the United States with respect to the Panama
Canal will continue to be protected after the Govern-
ment of the Republic of Panama assumes sole re-
sponsibility for the defense of the Canal and be-
comes the only entity entitled to have military
forces, defense sites, or military installations in Pan-
ama after December 31, 1999.
(c) REPORTS BY THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTEL-
LIGENCE.—Not later than March 31 of each year, the Di-
rector of Central Intelligence, in cooperation with the
heads of other appropriate Federal agencies, including the
Director of the National Security Agency, the Director of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secretary of De-
fense, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of
Commerce and the Secretary of State, shall prepare and
submit to the Congress a report, in both classified and
unclassified form, on the intelligence activities of the Peo-
ple’s Republic of China against or affecting United States
interests in the Republic of Panama, including a descrip-
tion of—
(1) the extent of political, military, and eco-
nomic espionage by the People’s Republic of China;
(2) the extent of intelligence activities by the
People’s Republic of China designed to gain political
influence;
(3) efforts by the People’s Republic of China to
gain direct or indirect influence through commercial
or noncommercial intermediaries subject to control
by the People’s Republic of China, including enter-
prises controlled by the People’s Liberation Army;
and
(4) disinformation or press manipulation di-
rected against the United States.
(d) REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF
NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY.—Not later than 60
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Direc-
tor of the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall
prepare and submit to the Congress a report on the utility
of maintaining a military presence in the Republic of Pan-
ama for interdicting illegal drugs.
SEC. 5. RENEGOTIATION OF THE PANAMA CANAL TREATY.
(a) RENEGOTIATION OF EXISTING TREATIES; NEGO-
TIATION OF NEW TREATY.—The President is authorized
and directed to confer with the Government of the Repub-
lic of Panama to renegotiate the terms of the Panama
Canal Treaty and the Treaty Concerning the Neutrality
and Operation of the Panama Canal, or to negotiate a new
agreement to supersede the such Treaties, for the purpose
of providing for the security of the Canal into the 21st
Century.
(b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of
the Congress that any negotiations conducted under sub-
section (a) should include the following:
(1) A ban on foreign government investment in,
or management of, the Panama Canal and related
projects or other infrastructure projects related to
transit across the isthmus of Panama or through
Panamanian territory.
(2) The right to a continuing United States
military presence in Panama to actively cooperate
with Panama in the defense of the Panama Canal.
(3) A continuing United States presence in
Panama to actively cooperate with Panama in the
interdiction and eradication of illegal drug traf-
ficking through the territory of Panama or adjacent
areas.
(4) The right to control or prohibit the use of
the Panama Canal by hostile powers, terrorist
states, or criminal groups, by redefining the terms
of the 1977 Treaty Concerning the Neutrality and
Operation of the Panama Canal to apply only to its
peaceful, non-belligerent use by states or entities
other than the United States and Panama.
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act:
(1) PANAMA CANAL TREATY.—The term ‘‘Pan-
ama Canal Treaty’’ means the Panama Canal Trea-
ty between the United States and the Republic of
Panama, signed at Washington on September 7,
1977 (33 UST 39).
(2) TREATY
CONCERNING
THE
PERMANENT
NEUTRALITY
AND
OPERATION
OF
THE
PANAMA
CANAL.—The term ‘‘Treaty Concerning the Perma-
nent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama
Canal’’ means the Treaty Concerning the Permanent
Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal be-
tween the United States and the Republic of Pan-
ama, signed at Washington on September 7, 1977
(33 UST 1).
(3) UNITED
STATES
ASSISTANCE.—The term
‘‘United States assistance’’ means—
(A) assistance under part I of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et
seq.) (including programs under title IV of
chapter 2 of such part; relating to the Overseas
Private Investment Corporation), except that
such term does not include humanitarian assist-
ance;
(B) assistance under chapter 2 of part II
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
U.S.C. 2311 et seq.; relating to military assist-
ance), including the transfer of excess defense
articles under section 516 of such Act;
(C) assistance under chapter 5 of part II
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
U.S.C. 2347 et seq.; relating to international
military education and training);
(D) assistance under the ‘‘Foreign Military
Financing Program’’ under section 23 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763);
(E) the transfer of defense articles, defense
services, or defense and construction services
under Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2751 et seq.), including defense articles and de-
fense services licensed or approved for export
under section 38 of such Act; or
(F) financing under the Export-Import
Bank Act of 1945.
Æ