606 
† HR 1540 PP
(B) by designating the second sentence as a 
new paragraph (2) and indenting such para-
graph, as so designated, two ems from the left 
margin; and 
(C) in such paragraph (2), as so des-
ignated— 
(i) by striking ‘‘45 days’’ and inserting 
‘‘90 days’’; and 
(ii) by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The report shall include the 
plan of the Chief Operating Officer to ad-
dress the recommendations and other mat-
ters set forth in the report.’’; and 
(3) in subsection (e)(1)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘45 days’’ and inserting 
‘‘60 days’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘Director of the facility con-
cerned’’ and inserting ‘‘Chief Operating Officer’’; 
and 
(C) by striking ‘‘, the Chief Operating Offi-
cer,’’ after ‘‘Secretary of Defense’’. 
SEC. 1428. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE PROVISIONS. 
Part B, relating to transitional provisions for the 
Armed Forces Retirement Home Board and the Directors
607 
† HR 1540 PP
and Deputy Directors of the facilities of the Armed Forces 
Retirement Home, is repealed. 
SEC. 
1429. 
TECHNICAL, 
CONFORMING, 
AND 
CLERICAL 
AMENDMENTS. 
(a) CORRECTION OF OBSOLETE REFERENCES TO RE-
TIREMENT HOME BOARD.— 
(1) ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME ACT.— 
Section 1519(a)(2) (24 U.S.C. 419(a)(2)) is amended 
by striking ‘‘Retirement Home Board’’ and inserting 
‘‘Chief Operating Officer’’. 
(2) TITLE 10, USC.—Section 2772(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Armed 
Forces Retirement Home Board’’ and inserting ‘‘Chief 
Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement 
Home’’. 
(b) SECTION HEADINGS.— 
(1) SECTION 1501.—The heading of section 1501 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 1501. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.’’. 
(2) SECTION 1513.—The heading of section 1513 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 1513. SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS.’’. 
(3) SECTION
1513A.—The heading of section 
1513A is amended to read as follows:
608 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘SEC. 1513A. OVERSIGHT OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED TO 
RESIDENTS.’’. 
(4) SECTION 1517.—The heading of section 1517 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 1517. ADMINISTRATORS, OMBUDSMEN, AND STAFF OF 
FACILITIES.’’. 
(5) SECTION 1518.—The heading of section 1518 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 1518. PERIODIC INSPECTION OF RETIREMENT HOME 
FACILITIES BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IN-
SPECTOR GENERAL AND OUTSIDE INSPEC-
TORS.’’. 
(6) PUNCTUATION.—The headings of sections 
1512 and 1520 are each amended by adding a period 
at the end. 
(c) PART A HEADER.—The heading for part A is re-
pealed. 
(d) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents in 
section 1501(b) is amended— 
(1) by striking the item relating to the heading 
for part A; 
(2) by striking the items relating to sections 
1513 and 1513A and inserting the following new 
items: 
‘‘Sec. 1513. Services provided to residents. 
‘‘Sec. 1513A. Oversight of health care provided to residents.’’;
609 
† HR 1540 PP
(3) by striking the items relating to sections 
1516, 1517, and 1518 and inserting the following new 
items: 
‘‘Sec. 1516. Advisory Council. 
‘‘Sec. 1517. Administrators, Ombudsmen, and staff of facilities. 
‘‘Sec. 1518. Periodic inspection of Retirement Home facilities by Department of 
Defense Inspector General and outside inspectors.’’; and 
(4) by striking the items relating to part B (in-
cluding the items relating to sections 1531, 1532, and 
1533). 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 1431. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF 
VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY DEM-
ONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN JAMES A. 
LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 
(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Funds 
authorized to be appropriated by section 1403 and available 
for Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance 
as specified in the funding table in section 4401 may be 
transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Depart-
ment of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection 
(a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 
1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts
610 
† HR 1540 PP
authorized and appropriated for the Department of Defense 
specifically for such transfer. 
(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For purposes of 
subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for 
which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used 
are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal 
Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Vet-
erans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care 
Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined 
Federal medical facility under an operational agreement 
pursuant to section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 455). 
TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF 
APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVER-
SEAS 
CONTINGENCY 
OPER-
ATIONS 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropria-
tions for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 
to provide additional funds for overseas contingency oper-
ations being carried out by the Armed Forces.
611 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2012 for procurement accounts for the Army, the 
Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense- 
wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 
4102. 
SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUA-
TION. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2012 for the use of the Department of Defense for 
research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in 
the funding table in section 4202. 
SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for ex-
penses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and main-
tenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 
SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2012 for the Department of Defense for military 
personnel in the amount of $10,228,566,000. 
SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal year 2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
612 
† HR 1540 PP
providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, 
as specified in the funding table in section 4402. 
SEC. 1507. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not 
otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as 
specified in the funding table in section 4402. 
SEC. 1508. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG AC-
TIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not 
otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter- 
Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding 
table in section 4402. 
SEC. 1509. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not 
otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector Gen-
eral of the Department of Defense, as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4402. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this 
title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be 
appropriated by this Act.
613 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the 
Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in 
the national interest, the Secretary may transfer 
amounts of authorizations made available to the De-
partment of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2012 
between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 
(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authoriza-
tions so transferred shall be merged with and be 
available for the same purposes as the authorization 
to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of author-
izations that the Secretary may transfer under the 
authority 
of 
this 
subsection 
may 
not 
exceed 
$4,000,000,000. 
(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this 
section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions 
as transfers under section 1001. 
(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority 
provided by this section is in addition to the transfer au-
thority provided under section 1001.
614 
† HR 1540 PP
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
SEC. 1531. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF 
AUTHORITY FOR TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS 
AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANI-
STAN. 
(a) ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of 
section 1535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 
Stat. 4426) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘may include 
projects’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘may in-
clude projects that facilitate private investment, min-
ing sector development, industrial development, and 
other projects determined by the Secretary of Defense, 
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, as 
strengthening stability or providing strategic support 
to the counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan.’’; 
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘The’’ and in-
serting ‘‘During each of fiscal years 2011 and 2012, 
the’’; 
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) 
as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively; and 
(4) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol-
lowing new paragraph (5):
615 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘(5) AVAILABILITY
OF
FUNDS
FOR
ACTIVITIES 
ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts available to carry 
out the authority in paragraph (1) shall be available 
for projects under that authority that begin in a fiscal 
year and end in the following fiscal year.’’. 
(b) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION
OF AUTHORITY.—Para-
graph (8) of such subsection, as redesignated by subsection 
(a)(3) of this section, is further amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(8) EXPIRATION
OF
AUTHORITY.—A project 
may not be commenced under the authority in para-
graph (1) after September 30, 2012.’’. 
(c) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Paragraph (7) of such sub-
section, as so redesignated, is further amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 
by striking ‘‘, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘of each year fol-
lowing a fiscal year in which the authority in para-
graph (1) is exercised’’; and 
(2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘during 
fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘during that fiscal 
year’’. 
(d) AUTHORITY FOR ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIVES 
ON TASK FORCE.—Such section is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 
subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and
616 
† HR 1540 PP
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following 
new subsection (c): 
‘‘(c) ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—The members of the 
Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Af-
ghanistan may include the following: 
‘‘(1) A representative of the Department of State, 
designated by the Secretary of State. 
‘‘(2) A representative of the United States Agen-
cy for International Development, designated by the 
Administrator of the United States Agency for Inter-
national Development.’’. 
SEC. 1532. MODIFICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN 
AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND. 
(a) LIMITATIONS.—Funds available to the Department 
of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fis-
cal year 2012 shall be subject to the conditions contained 
in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Pub-
lic Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 
1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 
4424). 
(b) AVAILABILITY FOR LITERACY INSTRUCTION AND 
TRAINING.—Assistance provided utilizing funds in the Af-
ghanistan Security Forces Fund may include literacy in-
617 
† HR 1540 PP
struction and training to build the logistical, management, 
and administrative capacity of military and civilian per-
sonnel of the Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior, 
including through instruction at training facilities of the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Training Mission in 
Afghanistan. 
SEC. 1533. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
TRANS REGIONAL WEB INITIATIVE. 
None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
this Act may be obligated or expended on any program 
under the Trans Regional Web Initiative of the Department 
of Defense, or any similar initiative, until the Secretary 
of Defense certifies, in writing, to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that 
such program— 
(1) appropriately defines its target audience; 
(2) is determined to be the most effective method 
to reach such target audience; 
(3) is the most cost-effective means of reaching 
such target audience; and 
(4) includes measurement mechanisms to ensure 
such target audience is being reached.
618 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 1534. REPORT ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEPART-
MENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
PARTICIPATION 
ON 
INTERAGENCY 
TEAMS 
FOR 
COUNTERTER-
RORISM OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN AND 
IRAQ. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report on the lessons learned from Department of De-
fense participation on interagency teams for counterter-
rorism operations on Afghanistan and Iraq. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) An assessment of the value of interagency 
teams in counterterrorism operations. 
(2) A description of the best practices of such 
interagency teams. 
(3) A description of efforts to codify the best 
practices of interagency teams described under para-
graph (2) in military doctrine. 
(4) An assessment whether the lessons learned 
through Department of Defense participation on such 
interagency teams is applicable to other interagency 
teams in which Department personnel participate. 
(5) An assessment of the feasibility and advis-
ability of adding a skill identifier to track Depart-
619 
† HR 1540 PP
ment civilian and military personnel who have suc-
cessfully supported, participated on, or led an inter-
agency team. 
(6) A description of the additional authorities, if 
any, needed to permit Department personnel to more 
effectively support, participate on, or lead an inter-
agency team. 
TITLE XVI—NATIONAL GUARD 
EMPOWERMENT 
SEC. 1601. SHORT TITLE. 
This title may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Em-
powerment and State-National Defense Integration Act of 
2011’’. 
SEC. 1602. REESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF VICE CHIEF 
OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU AND TER-
MINATION OF POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF 
THE JOINT STAFF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD 
BUREAU. 
(a) REESTABLISHMENT AND TERMINATION OF POSI-
TIONS.—Section 10505 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 10505. Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau 
‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT.—(1) There is a Vice Chief of the 
National Guard Bureau, selected by the Secretary of De-
fense from officers of the Army National Guard of the
620 
† HR 1540 PP
United States or the Air National Guard of the United 
States who— 
‘‘(A) are recommended for such appointment by 
their respective Governors or, in the case of the Dis-
trict of Columbia, the commanding general of the Dis-
trict of Columbia National Guard; 
‘‘(B) have had at least 10 years of federally rec-
ognized service in an active status in the National 
Guard; and 
‘‘(C) are in a grade above the grade of brigadier 
general. 
‘‘(2) The Chief and Vice Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau may not both be members of the Army or of the 
Air Force. 
‘‘(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), an 
officer appointed as Vice Chief of the National Guard Bu-
reau serves for a term of four years, but may be removed 
from office at any time for cause. 
‘‘(B) The term of the Vice Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau shall end within a reasonable time (as determined 
by the Secretary of Defense) following the appointment of 
a Chief of the National Guard Bureau who is a member 
of the same armed force as the Vice Chief.
621 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—The Vice Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau performs such duties as may be prescribed by the 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau. 
‘‘(c) GRADE.—The Vice Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau shall be appointed to serve in the grade of lieuten-
ant general. 
‘‘(d) FUNCTIONS AS ACTING CHIEF.—When there is a 
vacancy in the office of the Chief of the National Guard 
Bureau or in the absence or disability of the Chief, the Vice 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau acts as Chief and per-
forms the duties of the Chief until a successor is appointed 
or the absence of disability ceases.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) Section 10502 of such title is amended by 
striking subsection (e). 
(2) Section 10506(a)(1) of such title is amended 
by striking ‘‘and the Director of the Joint Staff of the 
National Guard Bureau’’ and inserting ‘‘and the Vice 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau’’. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of sec-
tion 10502 of such title is amended to read as follows:
622 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘§ 10502. Chief of the National Guard Bureau: ap-
pointment; advisor on National Guard 
matters; grade’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 1011 of such title is 
amended— 
(A) by striking the item relating to section 
10502 and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘10502. Chief of the National Guard Bureau: appointment; advisor on National 
Guard matters; grade.’’; 
and 
(B) by striking the item relating to section 
10505 and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘10505. Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau.’’. 
SEC. 1603. MEMBERSHIP OF THE CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL 
GUARD BUREAU ON THE JOINT CHIEFS OF 
STAFF. 
(a) MEMBERSHIP ON JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.—Sec-
tion 151(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(7) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 10502 of 
such title, as amended by section 2(b)(1) of this Act, is fur-
ther amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection 
(e); and
623 
† HR 1540 PP
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following 
new subsection (d): 
‘‘(d) MEMBER
OF JOINT CHIEFS
OF STAFF.—The 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall perform the du-
ties prescribed for him or her as a member of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff under section 151 of this title.’’. 
SEC. 1604. CONTINUATION AS A PERMANENT PROGRAM 
AND ENHANCEMENT OF ACTIVITIES OF TASK 
FORCE FOR EMERGENCY READINESS PILOT 
PROGRAM OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY 
MANAGEMENT AGENCY. 
(a) CONTINUATION.— 
(1) CONTINUATION AS PERMANENT PROGRAM.— 
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency shall continue the Task Force for Emer-
gency Readiness (TFER) pilot program of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency as a permanent pro-
gram of the Agency. 
(2) LIMITATION ON TERMINATION.—The Admin-
istrator may not terminate the Task Force for Emer-
gency Readiness program, as so continued, until au-
thorized or required to terminate the program by law. 
(b) EXPANSION OF PROGRAM SCOPE.—As part of the 
continuation of the Task Force for Emergency Readiness 
program pursuant to subsection (a), the Administrator
624 
† HR 1540 PP
shall carry out the program in at least five States in addi-
tion to the five States in which the program is carried out 
as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(c) ADDITIONAL FEMA ACTIVITIES.—As part of the 
continuation of the Task Force for Emergency Readiness 
program pursuant to subsection (a), the Administrator 
shall— 
(1) establish guidelines and standards to be used 
by the States in strengthening the planning and plan-
ning capacities of the States with respect to responses 
to catastrophic disaster emergencies; and 
(2) develop a methodology for implementing the 
Task Force for Emergency Readiness that includes 
goals and standards for assessing the performance of 
the Task Force. 
(d) NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU ACTIVITIES.—As part 
of the continuation of the Task Force for Emergency Readi-
ness program pursuant to subsection (a), the Chief of the 
National Guard Bureau shall— 
(1) assist the Administrator in the establishment 
of the guidelines and standards, implementation 
methodology, and performance goals and standards 
required by subsection (c); 
(2) in coordination with the Administrator—
625 
† HR 1540 PP
(A) identify, using catastrophic disaster re-
sponse plans for each State developed under the 
program, any gaps in State civilian and mili-
tary response capabilities that Federal military 
capabilities are unprepared to fill; and 
(B) notify the Secretary of Defense, the 
Commander of the United States Northern Com-
mand, and the Commander of the United States 
Pacific Command of any gaps in capabilities 
identified under subparagraph (A); and 
(3) acting through and in coordination with the 
Adjutants General of the States, assist the States in 
the development of State plans on responses to cata-
strophic disaster emergencies. 
(e) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Administrator and the 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall jointly submit 
to the appropriate committees of Congress each year a re-
port on activities under the Task Force for Emergency 
Readiness program during the preceding year. Each report 
shall include a description of the activities under the pro-
gram during the preceding year and a current assessment 
of the effectiveness of the program in meeting its purposes. 
(f) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES
OF CONGRESS DE-
FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees 
of Congress’’ means—
626 
† HR 1540 PP
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
Representatives. 
SEC. 1605. REPORT ON COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COSTS 
OF COMPARABLE UNITS OF THE RESERVE 
COMPONENTS AND THE REGULAR COMPO-
NENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report setting forth a comparative analysis 
of the costs of units of the regular components of the 
Armed Forces with the costs of similar units of the re-
serve components of the Armed Forces. The analysis 
shall include a separate comparison of the costs of 
units in the aggregate and of the costs of units solely 
when on active duty. 
(2) SIMILAR UNITS.—For purposes of this sub-
section, units of the regular components and reserve 
components shall be treated as similar if such units 
have the same general structure, personnel, or func-
627 
† HR 1540 PP
tion, or are substantially composed of personnel hav-
ing identical or similar military occupational spe-
cialties (MOS). 
(b) ASSESSMENT OF INCREASED RESERVE COMPO-
NENT PRESENCE IN TOTAL FORCE STRUCTURE.—The Sec-
retary shall include in the report required by subsection (a) 
an assessment of the advisability of increasing the number 
of units and members of the reserve components of the 
Armed Forces within the total force structure of the Armed 
Forces. The assessment shall take into account the compara-
tive analysis conducted for purposes of subsection (a) and 
such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate 
for purposes of the assessment. 
(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 
180 days after the date of the submittal of the report re-
quired by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees a report setting forth a review of such report by 
the Comptroller General. The report of the Comptroller Gen-
eral shall include an assessment of the comparative analysis 
contained in the report required by subsection (a) and of 
the assessment of the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b).
628 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 1606. DISPLAY OF PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT FOR 
THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES UNDER ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 
FOR PROCUREMENT IN FUTURE-YEARS DE-
FENSE PROGRAMS. 
Each future-years defense program submitted to Con-
gress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, 
shall, in setting forth estimated expenditures and item 
quantities for procurement for the Armed Forces for the fis-
cal years covered by such program, display separately 
under such estimated expenditures and item quantities the 
estimated expenditures for each such fiscal year for equip-
ment for each reserve component of the Armed Forces that 
will receive items in any fiscal year covered by such pro-
gram. 
SEC. 1607. ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO 
THE UNITED STATES NORTHERN COMMAND 
AND OTHER COMBATANT COMMANDS. 
(a) COMMANDS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORT TO CIVIL 
AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES.—The United States 
Northern Command and the United States Pacific Com-
mand shall be the combatant commands of the Armed 
Forces that are principally responsible for the support of 
civil authorities in the United States by the Armed Forces. 
(b) DISCHARGE OF RESPONSIBILITY.—In discharging 
the responsibility set forth in subsection (a), the Com-
629 
† HR 1540 PP
mander of the United States Northern Command and the 
Commander of the United States Pacific Command shall 
each— 
(1) in consultation with and acting through the 
Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Joint 
Force Headquarters of the National Guard of the 
State or States concerned, assist the States in the em-
ployment of the National Guard under State control, 
including National Guard operations conducted in 
State active duty or under title 32, United States 
Code; and 
(2) facilitate the deployment of the Armed Forces 
on active duty under title 10, United States Code, as 
necessary to augment and support the National 
Guard in its support of civil authorities when Na-
tional Guard operations are conducted under State 
control, whether in State active duty or under title 
32, United States Code. 
(c) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.— 
(1) MEMORANDUM REQUIRED.—Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Commander of the United States Northern Com-
mand, the Commander of the United States Pacific 
Command, and the Chief of the National Guard Bu-
reau shall, with the approval of the Secretary of De-
630 
† HR 1540 PP
fense, jointly enter into a memorandum of under-
standing setting forth the operational relationships, 
and individual roles and responsibilities, during re-
sponses to domestic emergencies among the United 
States Northern Command, the United States Pacific 
Command, and the National Guard Bureau. 
(2) MODIFICATION.—The Commander of the 
United States Northern Command, the Commander of 
the United States Pacific Command, and the Chief of 
the National Guard Bureau may from time to time 
modify the memorandum of understanding under this 
subsection to address changes in circumstances and 
for such other purposes as the Commander of the 
United States Northern Command, the Commander of 
the United States Pacific Command, and the Chief of 
the National Guard Bureau jointly consider appro-
priate. Each such modification shall be subject to the 
approval of the Secretary of Defense. 
(d) AUTHORITY TO MODIFY ASSIGNMENT OF COM-
MAND RESPONSIBILITY.—Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as altering or limiting the power of the President 
or the Secretary of Defense to modify the Unified Command 
Plan in order to assign all or part of the responsibility de-
scribed in subsection (a) to a combatant command other
631 
† HR 1540 PP
than the United States Northern Command or the United 
States Pacific Command. 
(e) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
prescribe regulations for purposes of aiding the expeditious 
implementation of the authorities and responsibilities in 
this section. 
SEC. 1608. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO NATIONAL GUARD 
OFFICERS IN CERTAIN COMMAND POSITIONS. 
(a) COMMANDER OF ARMY NORTH COMMAND.—The of-
ficer serving in the position of Commander, Army North 
Command, shall be an officer in the Army National Guard 
of the United States. 
(b) COMMANDER OF AIR FORCE NORTH COMMAND.— 
The officer serving in the position of Commander, Air Force 
North Command, shall be an officer in the Air National 
Guard of the United States. 
(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress 
that, in assigning officers to the command positions speci-
fied in subsections (a) and (b), the President should afford 
a preference in assigning officers in the Army National 
Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the 
United States, as applicable, who have served as the adju-
tant general of a State.
632 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 1609. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS UNDER STATE PART-
NERSHIP PROGRAM FOR ADDITIONAL NA-
TIONAL 
GUARD 
CONTACTS 
ON 
MATTERS 
WITHIN THE CORE COMPETENCIES OF THE 
NATIONAL GUARD. 
The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with 
the Secretary of State, modify the regulations prescribed 
pursuant to section 1210 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) to provide for the use of 
funds available pursuant to such regulations for contacts 
between members of the National Guard and civilian per-
sonnel of foreign governments outside the ministry of de-
fense on matters within the core competencies of the Na-
tional Guard such as the following: 
(1) Disaster response and mitigation. 
(2) Defense support to civilian authorities. 
(3) Consequence management and installation 
protection. 
(4) Chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear 
event (CBRNE) response. 
(5) Border and port security and cooperation 
with civilian law enforcement. 
(6) Search and rescue. 
(7) Medical matters. 
(8) Counterdrug and counternarcotics activities.
633 
† HR 1540 PP
(9) Public affairs. 
(10) Employer and family support of reserve 
forces. 
(11) Such other matters within the core com-
petencies of the National Guard and suitable for con-
tacts under the State Partnership Program as the 
Secretary of Defense shall specify. 
DIVISION 
B—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY 
LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE 
YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all author-
izations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military 
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 
(and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 
on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or
634 
† HR 1540 PP
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
2015. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to au-
thorizations for military construction projects, land acqui-
sition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 
Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations 
therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated 
before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2014; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act author-
izing funds for fiscal year 2015 for military construc-
tion projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, or contributions to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program. 
SEC. 2003. FUNDING TABLES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The amounts authorized to be ap-
propriated by sections 2104, 2204, 2304, 2403, 2411, 2502, 
and 2606 shall be available in the amounts specified in the 
funding table in section 4501. 
(b) BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES.— 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 2703
635 
† HR 1540 PP
shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding 
table in section 4501. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY 
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2104(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort Rucker ........................................................
$11,600,000 
Alaska .........................
Fort Wainwright ...............................................
$114,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ...................
$103,600,000 
California ..................
Presidio of Monterey .........................................
$3,000,000 
Fort Irwin ..........................................................
$23,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Fort Carson ........................................................
$238,600,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning .....................................................
$66,700,000 
Fort Gordon .......................................................
$1,450,000 
Fort Stewart ......................................................
$2,600,000 
Hawaii .......................
Fort Shafter .......................................................
$17,500,000 
Schofield Barracks .............................................
$105,000,000 
Kansas .......................
Fort Riley ..........................................................
$83,400,000 
Forbes Air Field ................................................
$5,300,000 
Kentucky ....................
Fort Campbell ....................................................
$247,500,000 
Fort Knox ..........................................................
$55,000,000 
Louisiana ...................
Fort Polk ............................................................
$70,100,000 
Maryland ...................
Aberdeen Proving Ground ................................
$78,500,000 
Fort Meade .........................................................
$79,000,000 
Missouri .....................
Fort Leonard Wood ...........................................
$49,000,000 
New York ....................
Fort Drum .........................................................
$13,300,000 
North Carolina ..........
Fort Bragg .........................................................
$186,000,000 
Oklahoma ...................
Fort Sill .............................................................
$184,600,000 
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant ...............
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ..........
Fort Jackson ......................................................
$63,900,000 
Texas ..........................
Fort Bliss ...........................................................
$110,900,000 
Fort Hood ..........................................................
$132,000,000 
Joint Base San Antonio ...................................
$10,400,000 
Red River Army Depot .....................................
$44,000,000 
Utah ...........................
Dugway Proving Ground .................................
$32,000,000 
Virginia .....................
Fort Belvoir .......................................................
$52,000,000 
Joint Base Langley Eustis ...............................
$26,000,000 
Washington ................
Joint Base Lewis McChord ...............................
$296,300,000
636 
† HR 1540 PP
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2104(2), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan ..................
Bagram Air Base ...........................................
$80,000,000 
Germany .......................
Grafenwoehr ....................................................
$22,500,000 
Landstuhl ........................................................
$63,000,000 
Oberdachstetten ...............................................
$12,200,000 
Kelley Barracks ..............................................
$12,200,000 
Vilseck ..............................................................
$20,000,000 
Korea .............................
Camp Carroll ..................................................
$41,000,000 
Camp Henry ...................................................
$48,000,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) 
CONSTRUCTION
AND
ACQUISITION.—Using 
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of ap-
propriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the 
Army may construct or acquire family housing units (in-
cluding land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the 
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in 
the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Units 
Amount 
Germany ..........................
Baumholder .....................
64 .....................
$34,329,000 
Illesheim ..........................
80 .....................
$41,000,000 
Vilseck ..............................
22 .....................
$12,000,000 
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
637 
† HR 1540 PP
section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry 
out architectural and engineering services and construction 
design activities with respect to the construction or im-
provement of family housing units in an amount not to 
exceed $7,897,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Army may improve existing military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000. 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Army in the total 
amount of $3,643,146,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(a), 
$2,400,250,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2101(b), 
$298,900,000.
638 
† HR 1540 PP
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $20,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $195,241,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $176,897,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including the functions described in section 
2833 
of 
title 
10, 
United 
States 
Code), 
$494,858,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
aviation complex, phase 3A at Fort Wainwright, 
Alaska, authorized by section 2101(a) of this Act, 
$57,000,000. 
SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for 
construction of a Multipurpose Training Range at the in-
639 
† HR 1540 PP
stallation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 
1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the Army’s 
construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training Ranges. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, 
Washington, for construction of an access road adjoining 
McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis, the Secretary of 
the Army may construct a secure elevated roadway over the 
existing railroad and public road in lieu of an on-grade 
road and access control point. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 
(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Schofield 
Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 
452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 451 
in lieu of building 452. 
(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Con-
640 
† HR 1540 PP
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort Drum, 
New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance 
Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 
construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking apron con-
sistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Aircraft 
Maintenance Hangars and associated parking aprons. 
(c) GERMANY.—In the case of the authorization con-
tained in the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division 
B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden 
Air Base, Germany, for construction of an Information 
Processing Center at the installation, the Secretary of the 
Army may construct up to 9,400 square yards of vehicle 
parking garage consistent with the Army’s construction 
guidelines for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 
square yards of parking area. 
SEC. 2108. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CER-
TAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the 
Army may carry out a military construction project to con-
struct a water treatment facility for Fort Irwin, California, 
in the amount of $115,000,000. 
(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR ARMY MILI-
TARY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.—The Secretary may use
641 
† HR 1540 PP
available, unobligated Army military construction funds 
appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2012 for 
the project described in subsection (a). 
(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of 
the Army shall provide information in accordance with sec-
tion 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the 
project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary 
to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall uti-
lize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title re-
garding authorized cost and scope of work variations. 
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Louisiana ...........
Fort Polk ...........
Child Care Facility .......................
$6,100,000
642 
† HR 1540 PP
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations—Continued 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Missouri ..............
Fort Leonard 
Wood ..............
Multipurpose Machine Gun 
Range .........................................
$4,150,000 
SEC. 2110. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall 
remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the 
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military con-
struction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Alabama .............
Anniston Army 
Depot ..................
Lake Yard Interchange .............
$1,400,000 
Hawaii ...............
Schofield Barracks
Brigade Complex ......................
$65,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Battalion Complex ....................
$69,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Battalion Complex ....................
$27,000,000 
Schofield Barracks 
Infrastructure Expansion ........
$76,000,000 
New Jersey .........
Picatinny Arsenal 
Ballistic Evaluation Facility 
Phase I ..................................
$9,900,000 
Virginia ..............
Fort Eustis .............
Vehicle Paint Facility ..............
$3,900,000
643 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 2111. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT CER-
TAIN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 
The table in section 3002 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4503) is amended— 
(1) in the item for the Army relating to ‘‘Entry 
Control Point and Access Roads’’ that appears imme-
diately below the item relating to ‘‘Vet Clinic & Ken-
nel’’ at Bagram Air Force Base, by striking 
‘‘Delaram Ii’’ in the State/Country and Installation 
column and inserting ‘‘Delaram II’’; and 
(2) in the item for the Army that appears imme-
diately below the item relating to ‘‘Electrical Utility 
Systems, Ph.2’’ at the Shank installation, by striking 
‘‘Expand Extended Cooperation Programme I and 
Extended Cooperation Programme 2’’ in the Project 
Title column and inserting ‘‘Expand Entry Control 
Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2’’. 
SEC. 2112. REDUCTION OF ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Army for fiscal years prior 
to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $100,000,000.
644 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 2113. TOUR NORMALIZATION. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under 
this Act may be obligated or expended for tour normaliza-
tion until— 
(1) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
Evaluation conducts an analysis of alternatives to 
tour normalization that identifies alternative courses 
of action and their associated life cycle costs, poten-
tial benefits, advantages, and disadvantages; 
(2) the Secretary of the Army submits to the con-
gressional defense committees a master plan for com-
pleting all phases of tour normalization that includes 
a detailed description of all costs and a schedule for 
the construction of necessary facilities and infrastruc-
ture; and 
(3) legislation enacted after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act authorizes the obligation of funds for 
such purpose. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2204(1), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects
645 
† HR 1540 PP
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona .....................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma .....................
$162,785,000 
California .................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ...............
$335,080,000 
Naval Base, Coronado ........................................
$93,735,000 
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms ...........
$67,109,000 
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow .............
$8,590,000 
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training 
Center, Bridgeport ..........................................
$16,138,000 
Naval Base Ventura County Point Mugu ........
$15,377,000 
Florida ......................
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville ........................
$36,552,000 
Naval Station, Mayport .....................................
$14,998,000 
Naval Air Station, Whiting Field (Eglin Air 
Force Base) .....................................................
$20,620,000 
Georgia ......................
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay ..................
$86,063,000 
Hawaii ......................
Marine Corps Base, Kaneohe Bay ....................
$57,704,000 
Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking 
Sands ...............................................................
$9,679,000 
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ....................
$7,492,000 
Illinois .......................
Naval Station, Great Lakes ...............................
$91,042,000 
Maryland ..................
Naval Support Facility, Indian Head .............
$67,779,000 
Naval Air Station, Patuxent River ..................
$45,844,000 
North Carolina .........
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ..................
$200,482,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point .........
$17,760,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, New River .............
$78,930,000 
South Carolina .........
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ................
$21,096,000 
Virginia ....................
Naval Station, Norfolk .......................................
$81,304,000 
Naval Support Activity, Norfolk .......................
$26,924,000 
Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth ...........................
$74,864,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ...........................
$183,690,000 
Washington ...............
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Puget Sound 
Ship Yard) ......................................................
$13,341,000 
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Bangor) .........
$758,842,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2204(2), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installation or location outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Djibouti ........................
Camp Lemonier .................................................
$89,499,000 
Diego Garcia ................
Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia ...........
$35,444,000
646 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engi-
neering services and construction design activities with re-
spect to the construction or improvement of family housing 
units in an amount not to exceed $3,199,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Navy may improve existing military family 
housing units in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount 
of $2,641,457,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(a), 
$1,956,822,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2201(b), 
$124,943,000.
647 
† HR 1540 PP
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United 
States Code, $21,495,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $69,362,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, plan-
ning and design, and improvement of military 
family housing and facilities, $100,972,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 of 
title 10, United States Code), $367,863,000. 
SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201(c) of that Act (122 Stat. 511) 
and extended by section 2206 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Pub-
lic Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain in effect 
until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing
648 
† HR 1540 PP
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, which-
ever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ..................
$2,700,000 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT
FOR CONSISTENCY
IN 
PROJECT AUTHORIZATION DISPLAY.—The table in section 
2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 511) is amended to read as follows: 
Navy: Worldwide Unspecified 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Wharf Utilities Up-
grade ........................
$8,900,000 
Worldwide Unspecified 
Various ........................
Host Nation Infra-
structure ..................
$2,700,000 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2201 of that Act (122 Stat 4670), 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date
649 
† HR 1540 PP
of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 
fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State/Country 
Installation or Lo-
cation 
Project 
Amount 
California ...........
Marine Corps Base, 
Camp Pendelton .....
Operations Assess Points, 
Red Beach ........................
$11,970,000 
Marine Corps Air Sta-
tion, Miramar ........
Emergency Response Sta-
tion ...................................
$6,530,000 
District of Co-
lumbia ............
Washington Navy 
Yard ........................
Child Development Center ..
$9,340,000 
SEC. 2207. REDUCTION OF NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Navy for fiscal years prior 
to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $25,000,000. 
SEC. 2208. GUAM REALIGNMENT. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under 
this title, or amounts provided by the Government of Japan 
for military construction activities on land under the juris-
diction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated or 
expended to implement the realignment of United States 
Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam as envisioned 
in the United States–Japan Roadmap for Realignment Im-
plementation issued May 1, 2006, until—
650 
† HR 1540 PP
(1) the Commandant of the Marine Corps pro-
vides the congressional defense committees the Com-
mandant’s preferred force lay-down for the United 
States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility; 
(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the con-
gressional defense committees a master plan for the 
construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute 
the Commandant’s preferred force lay-down on Guam, 
including a detailed description of costs and a sched-
ule for such construction; 
(3) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the con-
gressional defense committees that tangible progress 
has been made regarding the relocation of Marine 
Corps Air Station Futenma; and 
(4) a plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal 
agencies is provided to the congressional defense com-
mittees detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a 
schedule for completion of construction, improve-
ments, and repairs to the non-military utilities, fa-
cilities, and infrastructure on Guam affected by the 
realignment of forces.
651 
† HR 1540 PP
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2304(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alaska .....................................
Eielson Air Force Base .....................
$45,000,000 
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ..
$97,000,000 
Arizona ...................................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .......
$33,000,000 
Luke Air Force Base .........................
$24,000,000 
California ...............................
Travis Air Force Base ......................
$22,000,000 
Vandenberg Air Force Base .............
$14,200,000 
Colorado .................................
U.S. Air Force Academy ..................
$13,400,000 
Delaware .................................
Dover Air Force Base .......................
$2,800,000 
Kansas ....................................
Fort Riley, Kansas ...........................
$7,600,000 
Louisiana ...............................
Barksdale Air Force Base ................
$23,500,000 
Missouri ..................................
Whiteman Air Force Base ................
$4,800,000 
Nebraska .................................
Offutt Air Force Base .......................
$564,000,000 
Nevada ....................................
Nellis Air Force Base .......................
$35,850,000 
New Mexico ............................
Cannon Air Force Base ....................
$22,598,000 
Holloman Air Force Base ................
$29,200,000 
Kirtland Air Force Base ..................
$25,000,000 
North Carolina .......................
Pope Air Force Base .........................
$6,000,000 
North Dakota .........................
Minot Air Force Base .......................
$67,800,000 
Texas .......................................
Joint Base San Antonio ...................
$110,000,000 
Utah ........................................
Hill Air Force Base ..........................
$16,500,000 
Virginia ..................................
Joint Base Langley Eustis ...............
$50,000,000 
Washington .............................
Fairchild Air Force Base .................
$27,600,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2304(2), the Secretary of the Air Force may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
652 
† HR 1540 PP
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany .........................................
Ramstein Air Base .......................
$34,697,000 
Greenland .......................................
Thule Air Base ..............................
$28,000,000 
Guam ..............................................
Joint Region Marianas ................
$64,400,000 
Italy ................................................
Naval Air Station, Signonella .....
$15,000,000 
Korea ..............................................
Osan Air Base ...............................
$23,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and 
engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family hous-
ing units in an amount not to exceed $4,208,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING 
UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force may improve existing military fam-
ily housing units in an amount not to exceed $80,596,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR 
FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total 
amount of $1,619,423,000, as follows:
654 
† HR 1540 PP
(7) For the construction of increment 1 of a 
STRATCOM replacement facility at Offutt Air Force 
Base, Nebraska, authorized by section 2301(a) of this 
Act, $120,000,000. 
SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY 
OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2636) for Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, 
for construction of a Ground Control Tower at the installa-
tion, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 43 
vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 square me-
ters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s con-
struction guidelines for control towers, using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations in 
prior years. 
SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2301(b) of that Act (122 Stat. 4680) 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date
655 
† HR 1540 PP
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later: 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Germany ............
Spangdahlem AB ............
Construct Child Devel-
opment Center ........
$11,400,000 
SEC. 2307. REDUCTION OF AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Air Force for fiscal years 
prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $32,000,000. 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE 
AGENCIES 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2403(1), the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the installations or locations inside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
656 
† HR 1540 PP
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Redstone Arsenal ................................................
$58,800,000 
Alaska .........................
Anchorage ............................................................
$18,400,000 
Eielson Air Force Base ......................................
$14,800,000 
Arizona .......................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base .........................
$23,000,000 
California ...................
Defense Distribution Depot Tracy ....................
$15,500,000 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ...............
$12,141,000 
Naval Base, Coronado ........................................
$42,000,000 
Naval Base, Coronado (San Clemente) .............
$21,800,000 
Colorado ......................
Buckley Air Force Base .....................................
$140,932,000 
District of Columbia ..
Bolling Air Force Base ......................................
$16,736,000 
Florida ........................
Eglin Air Force Base .........................................
$61,100,000 
Macdill Air Force Base ......................................
$15,200,000 
Naval Air Station, Whiting Field .....................
$3,800,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning ......................................................
$37,205,000 
Fort Gordon ........................................................
$17,705,000 
Fort Stewart .......................................................
$72,300,000 
Hawaii ........................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .....................
$14,400,000 
Illinois ........................
Naval Station, Great Lakes ...............................
$16,900,000 
Kentucky .....................
Fort Campbell .....................................................
$138,500,000 
Fort Knox ............................................................
$38,845,000 
Louisiana ...................
Barksdale Air Force Base ..................................
$6,200,000 
Maryland ....................
Joint Base Andrews ...........................................
$265,700,000 
National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda ........
$18,000,000 
Massachusetts .............
Hanscom Air Force Base ...................................
$34,040,000 
Westover Air Reserve Base .................................
$23,300,000 
Mississippi ..................
Columbus Air Force Base ..................................
$2,600,000 
Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport ..........
$34,700,000 
Missouri ......................
Arnold ..................................................................
$9,253,000 
New Mexico .................
Cannon Air Force Base .....................................
$132,997,000 
New York ....................
Fort Drum ...........................................................
$20,400,000 
North Carolina ...........
Camp Lejeune .....................................................
$6,670,000 
Fort Bragg ..........................................................
$206,274,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, New River .............
$22,687,000 
Pope Air Force Base ..........................................
$5,400,000 
Ohio .............................
Defense Supply Center Columbus .....................
$10,000,000 
Oklahoma ....................
Altus Air Force Base ..........................................
$8,200,000 
Pennsylvania ..............
Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland
$17,500,000 
Defense Supply Center Philadelphia ................
$8,000,000 
South Carolina ...........
Joint Base Charleston ........................................
$24,868,000 
Texas ...........................
Joint Base Antonio ............................................
$194,300,000 
Virginia ......................
Charlottesville .....................................................
$10,805,000 
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort 
Story ................................................................
$37,000,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ...........................
$46,727,000 
Naval Air Station, Oceana (Dam Neck) ..........
$23,116,000 
Dahlgren ..............................................................
$1,988,000 
Pentagon Reservation .........................................
$8,742,000 
Washington .................
Joint Base Lewis-McChord ................................
$35,000,000 
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island ..................
$25,000,000 
West Virginia .............
Camp Dawson .....................................................
$2,200,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2403(2), the Secretary of Defense may ac-
quire real property and carry out military construction
657 
† HR 1540 PP
projects for the installations or locations outside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Germany ...............
Ansbach ...............................................................
$11,672,000 
Grafenwoehr ........................................................
$6,529,000 
Spangdahlem Air Base ......................................
$129,043,000 
Stuttgart-Patch Barracks ..................................
$2,434,000 
Italy ......................
Vicenza ................................................................
$41,864,000 
Japan ....................
Yokota Air Base ..................................................
$61,842,000 
United Kingdom ..
Menwith Hill Station .........................................
$68,601,000 
Royal Air Force Alconbury ...............................
$35,030,000 
SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2403(6), the Secretary 
of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects 
under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the 
amount of $135,000,000. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE 
AGENCIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the mili-
tary departments) in the total amount of $3,212,498,000, 
as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(a), 
$1,476,499,000.
658 
† HR 1540 PP
(2) For military construction projects outside the 
United 
States 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(b), 
$357,004,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction 
projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States 
Code, $32,964,000. 
(4) For contingency construction projects of the 
Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, 
United States Code, $10,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services 
and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, $399,602,000. 
(6) For energy conservation projects under chap-
ter 173 of title 10, United States Code, $135,000,000. 
(7) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For support of military family housing 
(including functions described in section 2833 of 
title 10, United States Code), $50,723,000. 
(B) For credits to the Department of De-
fense Family Housing Improvement Fund under 
section 2883 of title 10, United States Code, and 
the Homeowners Assistance Fund established 
under section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities 
and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 
U.S.C. 3374), $3,468,000.
659 
† HR 1540 PP
(8) For the construction of increment 6 of the 
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Dis-
eases Stage I at Fort Detrick, Maryland, authorized 
by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of 
Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $137,600,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 4 of re-
placement fuel storage facilities at Point Loma 
Annex, California, authorized by section 2401(a) of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 
122 Stat. 521), as amended by section 2406 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2646), $27,000,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 4 of the 
United States Army Medical Research Institute of 
Chemical Defense replacement facility at Aberdeen 
Proving Ground, Maryland, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4689), $22,850,000. 
(11) For the construction of increment 3 of a Na-
tional Security Agency data center at Camp Wil-
liams, Utah, authorized as a Military Construction,
660 
† HR 1540 PP
Defense-Wide project by title IX of the Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 
Stat. 1888), $123,201,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 3 of the 
hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2642), $109,400,000. 
(13) For the construction of increment 1 of a 
Mountainview operations facility at Buckley Air 
Force Base, Colorado, authorized by section 2401(a) 
of this Act, $70,432,000. 
(14) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
ambulatory care center at Joint Base Andrews, Mary-
land, authorized by section 2401(a) of this Act, 
$121,500,000. 
(15) For the construction of increment 1 of an 
ambulatory care center, phase 3 at Fort Bliss, Texas, 
authorized 
by 
section 
2401(a) 
of 
this 
Act, 
$80,600,000.
661 
† HR 1540 PP
Subtitle B—Chemical 
Demilitarization Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEM-
ICAL 
DEMILITARIZATION 
CONSTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military 
construction and land acquisition for chemical demili-
tarization in the total amount of $75,312,000, as follows: 
(1) For the construction of phase 13 of a chem-
ical munitions demilitarization facility at Pueblo 
Chemical Activity, Colorado, authorized by section 
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 
104–201; 110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 
2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 
65; 113 Stat. 839), section 2407 of the Military Con-
struction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (di-
vision B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), 
and section 2413 of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), $15,338,000. 
(2) For the construction of phase 12 of a muni-
tions demilitarization facility at Blue Grass Army
662 
† HR 1540 PP
Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section 2401(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 
Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 
1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of 
Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 
122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
(division B Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), 
$59,974,000. 
SEC. 2412. REDUCTION OF DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 
Amounts previously authorized for military construc-
tion, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of Defense (other than the military 
departments) for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are 
hereby reduced by $131,000,000.
663 
† HR 1540 PP
TITLE 
XXV—NORTH 
ATLANTIC 
TREATY ORGANIZATION SE-
CURITY 
INVESTMENT 
PRO-
GRAM 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, 
United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum 
of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this pur-
pose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construc-
tion previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for contribu-
tions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 
10, United States Code, for the share of the United States 
of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
zation Security Investment Program authorized by section 
2501, in the amount of $240,611,000.
664 
† HR 1540 PP
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND 
RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CON-
STRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts ap-
propriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire 
real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the Army National Guard locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort McClellan ...................................................
$16,500,000 
Arizona ......................
Papago Military Reservation ...........................
$17,800,000 
Arkansas ....................
Fort Chafee ........................................................
$3,500,000 
California ..................
Camp Roberts ....................................................
$38,160,000 
Camp San Luis Obispo ....................................
$8,000,000 
Colorado .....................
Alamosa ..............................................................
$6,400,000 
Aurora ................................................................
$3,600,000 
Fort Carson ........................................................
$43,000,000 
District of Columbia
Anacostia ............................................................
$5,300,000 
Florida .......................
Camp Blanding .................................................
$5,500,000 
Georgia .......................
Atlanta ...............................................................
$11,000,000 
Hinesville ...........................................................
$17,500,000 
Macon .................................................................
$14,500,000 
Hawaii .......................
Kalaeloa .............................................................
$33,000,000 
Illinois ........................
Normal ...............................................................
$10,000,000 
Indiana ......................
Camp Atterbury ................................................
$81,900,000 
Indianapolis ......................................................
$25,700,000 
Maine .........................
Bangor ................................................................
$15,600,000 
Brunswick ..........................................................
$23,000,000 
Maryland ...................
Dundalk .............................................................
$16,000,000 
La Plata .............................................................
$9,000,000 
Westminster .......................................................
$10,400,000 
Massachusetts .............
Natick .................................................................
$9,000,000 
Minnesota ..................
Camp Ripley .....................................................
$8,400,000 
Mississippi .................
Camp Shelby ......................................................
$64,600,000 
Nebraska ....................
Grand Island .....................................................
$22,000,000 
Mead ...................................................................
$9,100,000 
Nevada .......................
Las Vegas ...........................................................
$23,000,000 
New Jersey .................
Lakehurst ...........................................................
$49,000,000 
New Mexico ................
Santa Fe ............................................................
$5,200,000 
North Carolina ..........
Greensboro ..........................................................
$3,700,000 
Oklahoma ...................
Camp Gruber .....................................................
$13,361,000 
Oregon ........................
The Dalles ..........................................................
$13,800,000 
South Carolina ..........
Allendale .............................................................
$4,300,000
665 
† HR 1540 PP
Army National Guard: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Utah ...........................
Camp Williams .................................................
$6,500,000 
Virginia .....................
Fort Pickett ........................................................
$11,000,000 
West Virginia ............
Buckhannon .......................................................
$10,000,000 
Wisconsin ...................
Camp Williams ..................................................
$7,000,000 
Wyoming ....................
Cheyenne ............................................................
$8,900,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts 
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropria-
tions in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Army National Guard locations outside the 
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Army National Guard: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Puerto Rico .........................
Fort Buchanan .........................................
$57,000,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION 
AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(2), the Secretary 
of the Army may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the Army Reserve locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in 
the following table: 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
Fort Hunter Liggett ................................
$5,200,000 
Colorado ..............................
Fort Collins ..............................................
$13,600,000 
Illinois .................................
Homewood ................................................
$16,000,000 
Rockford ....................................................
$12,800,000 
Indiana ...............................
Fort Benjamin Harrison .........................
$57,000,000
666 
† HR 1540 PP
Army Reserve—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Kansas .................................
Kansas City ..............................................
$13,000,000 
Massachusetts ......................
Attleboro ....................................................
$22,000,000 
Minnesota ............................
Saint Joseph .............................................
$11,800,000 
Missouri ...............................
Weldon Springs ........................................
$19,000,000 
New York .............................
Schenectady ..............................................
$20,000,000 
North Carolina ...................
Greensboro ................................................
$19,000,000 
South Carolina ...................
Orangeburg ...............................................
$12,000,000 
Wisconsin ............................
Fort McCoy ...............................................
$27,300,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE 
CORPS RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(3), the Secretary 
of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out mili-
tary construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 
Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in 
the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......................
Pittsburgh .................................................
$13,759,000 
Tennessee .............................
Memphis ....................................................
$7,949,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(4), the Secretary 
of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the Air National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table:
667 
† HR 1540 PP
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .........................
Beale Air Force Base .................................
$6,100,000 
Moffett Field ...............................................
$26,000,000 
Hawaii ..............................
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ............
$39,521,000 
Indiana .............................
Fort Wayne International Airport ...........
$4,000,000 
Maryland ..........................
Martin State Airport .................................
$4,900,000 
Massachusetts ....................
Otis Air National Guard Base ..................
$7,800,000 
Ohio ...................................
Springfield Beckley-Municipal Airport ....
$6,700,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUC-
TION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2606(5), the Secretary 
of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve lo-
cations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 
forth in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ............................
March Air Force Base .............................
$16,393,000 
South Carolina ...................
Charleston Air Force Base ......................
$9,593,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NA-
TIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for the costs 
of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and 
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, 
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 
of land for those facilities), in the following amounts:
668 
† HR 1540 PP
(1) For the Department of the Army, for the 
Army 
National 
Guard 
of 
the 
United 
States, 
$773,592,000. 
(2) For the Department of the Army, for the 
Army Reserve, $280,549,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Navy, for the 
Navy and Marine Corps Reserve, $26,299,000. 
(4) For the Department of the Air Force, for the 
Air 
National 
Guard 
of 
the 
United 
States, 
$116,246,000. 
(5) For the Department of the Air Force, for the 
Air Force Reserve, $33,620,000. 
SEC. 2607. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), 
the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), 
as provided in section 2601 and 2604 of that Act (122 Stat. 
527–528), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or 
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for 
military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is 
as follows:
669 
† HR 1540 PP
Army National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Pennsylvania ......
Coatesville .........
Readiness Center ...........................
$ 8,300,000 
SEC. 2608. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), 
the authorization set forth in the tables in subsection (b), 
as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2603 of that Act, 
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date 
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLES.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows: 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Indiana ..............
Camp Atterbury ..............
Multipurpose Machine 
Gun Range .............
$5,800,000 
Nevada ...............
Elko ..................................
Readiness Center ........
$11,375,000 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Mississippi .........
Gulfport-Biloxi Inter-
national Airport .........
Relocate munitions 
storage complex ......
$3,400,000 
Air Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
New York ...........
Staten Island ...................
Army Reserve Center
$18,550,000
670 
† HR 1540 PP
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve: Extension of 2009 
Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Delaware ............
Wilmington ......................
Armed Forces Reserve 
Center .....................
$11,530,000 
SEC. 2609. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT 
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table 
in section 2601(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4701) for Elko, Nevada, for construction 
of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may 
instead construct the Army Reserve Center at Carlin, Ne-
vada. 
TITLE XXVII—BASE CLOSURE 
AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
REALIGNMENT 
AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base clo-
sure and realignment activities, including real property ac-
quisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense
671 
† HR 1540 PP
Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of 
such Act, in the total amount of $323,543,000, as follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$70,716,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$129,351,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$123,476,000. 
SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLO-
SURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DE-
PARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AC-
COUNT 2005. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the author-
ization of appropriations in section 2703, the Secretary of 
Defense may carry out base closure and realignment activi-
ties, including real property acquisition and military con-
struction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Pub-
lic Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through 
the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 es-
tablished by section 2906A of such Act, in the amount of 
$258,776,000.
672 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 2703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
REALIGNMENT 
AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DE-
FENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fis-
cal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base clo-
sure and realignment activities, including real property ac-
quisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 
(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense 
Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A of 
such Act, in the total amount of $258,776,000 as follows: 
(1) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Army, 
$229,190,000. 
(2) 
For 
the 
Department 
of 
the 
Navy, 
$25,829,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, 
$1,966,000. 
(4) For the Defense Agencies, $1,791,000.
673 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 2704. REDUCTION OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AU-
THORIZATION FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND 
CLOSURE 
ACTIVITIES 
AUTHORIZED 
THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 
Amounts previously authorized for base closure and re-
alignment activities, including real property acquisition 
and military construction projects, as authorized by the De-
fense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A 
of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) 
and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure 
Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such Act for 
fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced 
by $100,000,000. 
TITLE 
XXVIII—MILITARY 
CON-
STRUCTION GENERAL PROVI-
SIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction 
Program and Military Family 
Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. GENERAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION TRANSFER 
AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION OF 
APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon a determination by the 
Secretary of a military department, or with respect
674 
† HR 1540 PP
to the Defense Agencies, the Secretary of Defense, that 
such action is necessary in the national interest, the 
Secretary concerned may transfer amounts of author-
ization of appropriations made available to that mili-
tary department or Defense Agency in this division 
for fiscal year 2012 between any such authorization 
of appropriations for that military department or De-
fense Agency for that fiscal year. Amounts of author-
ization of appropriations so transferred shall be 
merged with and be available for the same purposes 
as the authorization of appropriations to which 
transferred. 
(2) AGGREGATE LIMIT.—The aggregate amount 
of authorizations that the Secretaries concerned may 
transfer under the authority of this section may not 
exceed $400,000,000. 
(b) LIMITATION.—The authority provided by this sec-
tion to transfer authorizations may only be used to fund 
increases in the cost of military construction projects that 
have been authorized by law. 
(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A trans-
fer made from one account to another under the authority 
of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount au-
thorized for appropriation for the account to which the
675 
† HR 1540 PP
amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount 
transferred. 
(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary concerned 
shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees 
of each transfer made by that Secretary under subsection 
(a). 
SEC. 2802. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHOR-
ITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS OUT-
SIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 
2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 
Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4459), 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 
2011’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 
2012’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal 
year 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’.
676 
† HR 1540 PP
(b) MODIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORTING RE-
QUIREMENT.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY REPORTS OR’’ in 
the subsection heading; 
(2) by striking ‘‘the report for a fiscal-year quar-
ter under subsection (d) or’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘report or’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (a) and 
(i) of such section are amended by striking ‘‘Combined Task 
Force-Horn of Africa’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa’’. 
SEC. 2803. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE THE 
PENTAGON RESERVATION MAINTENANCE RE-
VOLVING FUND FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION 
AND ALTERATION ACTIVITIES AT THE PEN-
TAGON RESERVATION. 
Section 2674(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The authority’’ and inserting 
‘‘(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 
authority’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph: 
‘‘(B) The Secretary may use monies from the Fund 
to support construction or alteration activities at the Pen-
677 
† HR 1540 PP
tagon Reservation within the limits stated in section 2805 
of this title.’’. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and 
Facilities Administration 
SEC. 2811. EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY AT MILITARY INSTAL-
LATIONS. 
(a) EXCHANGE AUTHORITY.—Section 2869 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Con-
veyance of property at military installa-
tions to limit encroachment’’ and inserting 
‘‘Exchange of property at military instal-
lations’’; and 
(2) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in the subsection heading, by striking 
‘‘CONVEYANCE
AUTHORIZED; CONSIDERATION’’ 
and inserting ‘‘EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘to any 
person who agrees, in exchange for the real prop-
erty, to carry out a land acquisition’’ and in-
serting ‘‘to any eligible entity who agrees, in ex-
change for the real property, to transfer to the 
United States all right, title, and interest of the 
entity in and to a parcel of real property, in-
678 
† HR 1540 PP
cluding any improvements thereon under their 
control, or to carry out a land acquisition’’. 
(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Such section is fur-
ther amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (f); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as 
subsections (f) and (g), respectively. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by 
striking the item relating to section 2869 and inserting the 
following new item: 
‘‘2869. Exchange of property at military installations.’’. 
SEC. 2812. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO LIMIT EN-
CROACHMENTS. 
(a) INAPPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN CONTRACT RE-
QUIREMENTS.—Subsection (c) of section 2684a of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY
OF CERTAIN CONTRACT RE-
QUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, an 
agreement under this section that is a cooperative agree-
ment or a grant may be used to acquire property or services 
for the direct benefit or use of the United States Govern-
ment.’’. 
(b) ACQUISITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY AND 
INTERESTS.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3)—
679 
† HR 1540 PP
(A) by inserting ‘‘, and the monitoring and 
enforcement of any right, title, or interest in,’’ 
after ‘‘resources on’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘and monitoring and en-
forcement’’ after ‘‘natural resource manage-
ment’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘Any such payment by the United States— 
‘‘(A) may be paid in a lump sum and in-
clude an amount intended to cover the future 
costs of natural resource management and moni-
toring and enforcement; and 
‘‘(B) shall be placed by the eligible entity in 
an interest-bearing account, and any interest 
shall be applied for the same purposes as the 
principal.’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (5)— 
(A) inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(5)’’; 
(B) by inserting after the first sentence the 
following: ‘‘No such requirement need be included 
in the agreement if the property or interest is 
being transferred to a State, or the agreement re-
quires it to be subsequently transferred to a 
State, and the Secretary concerned determines 
that the laws and regulations applicable to the
680 
† HR 1540 PP
future use of such property or interest provide 
adequate assurance that the property concerned 
will be developed and used in a manner appro-
priate for purposes of this section.’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph: 
‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if all or a 
portion of the property or interest acquired under the agree-
ment is subsequently transferred to the United States and 
administrative jurisdiction over the property is under a 
Federal official other than a Secretary concerned, the Sec-
retary concerned and that Federal official shall enter into 
a memorandum of agreement providing, to the satisfaction 
of the Secretary concerned, for the management of the prop-
erty or interest concerned in a manner appropriate for pur-
poses of this section. Such memorandum of agreement shall 
also provide that, should it be proposed that the property 
or interest concerned be developed or used in a manner not 
appropriate for purposes of this section, including declaring 
the property to be excess to the agency’s needs or proposing 
to exchange the property for other property, the Secretary 
concerned may request that administrative jurisdiction over 
the property be transferred to the Secretary concerned at 
no cost, and, upon such a request being made, the adminis-
681 
† HR 1540 PP
trative jurisdiction over the property shall be transferred 
accordingly.’’. 
SEC. 2813. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONSERVATION AND 
CULTURAL ACTIVITIES. 
Section 2694(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and sus-
tainability’’ after ‘‘safety’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
paragraph: 
‘‘(F) The implementation of ecosystem-wide land 
management plans— 
‘‘(i) for a single ecosystem that encompasses 
at least two non-contiguous military installa-
tions, if those military installations are not all 
under the administrative jurisdiction of the same 
Secretary of a military department; and 
‘‘(ii) providing synergistic benefits unavail-
able if the installations acted separately.’’. 
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances 
SEC. 2821. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, CAMP 
JOSEPH T. ROBINSON, ARKANSAS. 
Section 2852 of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2685) is amended by striking ‘‘to be ac-
682 
† HR 1540 PP
quired by the United States of America’’ and inserting ‘‘to 
be acquired by the Military Department of Arkansas’’. 
SEC. 2822. CLARIFICATION OF LAND CONVEYANCE AUTHOR-
ITY, CAMP CAITLIN AND OHANA NUI AREAS, 
HAWAII. 
Section 2856(a) of the Military Construction Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2689) is amended by inserting before the 
period at the end the following: ‘‘, before the property or 
portion thereof is made available for transfer pursuant to 
the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act (title II of Public 
Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal 
agency, or for disposal under applicable laws’’. 
SEC. 2823. LAND CONVEYANCE AND EXCHANGE, JOINT 
BASE ELMENDORF RICHARDSON, ALASKA. 
(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.— 
(1) MUNICIPALITY
OF
ANCHORAGE.—The Sec-
retary of the Air Force may, in consultation with the 
Secretary of the Interior, convey to the Municipality 
of Anchorage (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Mu-
nicipality’’) all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to all or any part of a parcel of real 
property, including any improvements thereon, con-
sisting of approximately 220 acres at JBER situated 
to the west of and adjacent to the Anchorage Regional
683 
† HR 1540 PP
Landfill in Anchorage, Alaska, for solid waste man-
agement purposes, including reclamation thereof, and 
for alternative energy production, and other related 
activities. This authority may not be exercised unless 
and until the March 15, 1982, North Anchorage Land 
Agreement is amended by the parties thereto to spe-
cifically permit the conveyance under this subpara-
graph. 
(2) EKLUTNA, INC..—The Secretary of the Air 
Force may, in consultation with the Secretary of the 
Interior, upon terms mutually agreeable to the Sec-
retary of the Air Force and Eklutna, Inc., an Alaska 
Native village corporation organized pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 
et seq.) (in this section referred to as ‘‘Eklutna’’), con-
vey to Eklutna all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to all or any part of a parcel 
of real property, including any improvements thereon, 
consisting of approximately 130 acres situated on the 
northeast corner of the Glenn Highway and Boniface 
Parkway in Anchorage, Alaska, or such other prop-
erty as may be identified in consultation with the 
Secretary of the Interior, for any use compatible with 
JBER’s current and reasonably foreseeable mission as 
determined by the Secretary of the Air Force.
684 
† HR 1540 PP
(3) RIGHT TO WITHHOLD TRANSFER.—The Sec-
retary may withhold transfer of any portion of the 
real property described in paragraphs (1) and (2) 
based on public interest or military mission require-
ments. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) MUNICIPALITY PROPERTY.—As consideration 
for the conveyance under subsection (a)(1), the Sec-
retary of the Air Force shall receive in-kind solid 
waste management services at the Anchorage Regional 
Landfill or such other consideration as determined 
satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least fair 
market value of the property conveyed. 
(2) EKLUTNA PROPERTY.—As consideration for 
the conveyance under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary 
of the Air Force is authorized to receive, upon terms 
mutually agreeable to the Secretary and Eklutna, 
such interests in the surface estate of real property 
owned by Eklutna and situated at the northeast 
boundary of JBER and other consideration as consid-
ered satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least 
fair market value of the property conveyed. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force shall require the Municipality and Eklutna
685 
† HR 1540 PP
to reimburse the Secretary to cover costs (except costs 
for environmental remediation of the property) to be 
incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Sec-
retary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry 
out the conveyances under subsection (a), including 
survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, 
and any other administrative costs related to the con-
veyance. 
(2) TREATMENT
OF
AMOUNTS
RECEIVED.— 
Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph 
(1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was 
used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in 
carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited 
shall be merged with amounts in such fund or ac-
count, and shall be available for the same purposes, 
and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as 
amounts in such fund or account. 
(d) TREATMENT
OF
CASH
CONSIDERATION
RE-
CEIVED.—Any cash payment received by the United States 
as consideration for the conveyances under subsection (a) 
shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury 
established under subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, 
United States Code, and shall be available in accordance 
with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection.
686 
† HR 1540 PP
(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 
and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 
under subsection (a) shall be determined by surveys satis-
factory to the Secretary. 
(f) OTHER
OR ADDITIONAL TERMS
AND CONDI-
TIONS.—The Secretary may require such additional terms 
and conditions in connection with the conveyances under 
subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
protect the interests of the United States. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 2831. INVESTMENT PLAN FOR THE MODERNIZATION 
OF PUBLIC SHIPYARDS UNDER JURISDICTION 
OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. 
(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2012, 
the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a plan to address the facilities and in-
frastructure requirements at each public shipyard under the 
jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. 
(b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 
(a) shall include the following elements: 
(1) A description of the operations and support 
required at each shipyard under the control of the 
Secretary, including the location, year constructed, 
the classes of ships serviced, number of personnel as-
687 
† HR 1540 PP
signed, and the average age of facilities at each loca-
tion. 
(2) A review of all workload requirements in the 
past 5 years, an assessment of the efficiency in the use 
of existing facilities to meet the workload, and an es-
timate of the workload planned for each shipyard 
through the current Future Years Defense plan. 
(3) An assessment of the adequacy of each facil-
ity— 
(A) to carry out efficient depot-level ship 
maintenance with modern technology and equip-
ment; 
(B) to ensure workplace safety; 
(C) to support nuclear-related activities 
(where applicable); 
(D) to maintain the quality of life of the 
workforce; and 
(E) to meet the energy savings goals of the 
Secretary of the Navy for military installations. 
(4) An assessment of the existing condition of 
each facility at each shipyard to include a review of 
existing and projected deficiencies or inadequate con-
ditions at each facility, and whether any of the facili-
ties listed are temporary structures.
688 
† HR 1540 PP
(5) A description and cost estimate for each 
project to improve, repair, renovate, or modernize fa-
cilities or infrastructure. 
(6) A description of the facility improvements or 
new construction projects at each shipyard that would 
improve the efficiency of the facility’s operations or 
generate energy savings based upon a business case 
analysis. 
(7) An investment strategy planned for each 
shipyard to correct deficiencies identified in para-
graph (4), including timelines to complete each 
project and cost estimates and timelines necessary to 
complete the projects identified in paragraph (6). 
(8) A list of projects, costs, and timelines through 
the future years defense plan to meet the requirements 
of the minimum capital investment percentage re-
quired under section 2476 of title 10, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 2832. DATA SERVERS AND CENTERS. 
(a) LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.— 
(1) LIMITATIONS.— 
(A) BEFORE PERFORMANCE PLAN.—During 
the period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act and ending on May 1, 2012, a 
department, agency, or component of the Depart-
689 
† HR 1540 PP
ment of Defense may not obligate funds for a 
data server, data server upgrade, data server 
farm, or data center unless approved by the 
Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
Defense or the Chief Information Officer of a 
component of the Department to whom the Chief 
Information Officer of the Department has spe-
cifically delegated such approval authority. 
(B) UNDER
PERFORMANCE
PLAN.—After 
May 1, 2012, a department, agency, or compo-
nent of the Department may not obligate funds 
for a data center, or any information systems 
technology used therein, unless that obligation is 
in accordance with the performance plan re-
quired by subsection (b) and is approved as de-
scribed in subparagraph (A). 
(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVALS.— 
(A) BEFORE PERFORMANCE PLAN.—An ap-
proval of the obligation of funds may not be 
granted under paragraph (1)(A) unless the offi-
cial granting the approval determines, in writ-
ing, that existing resources of the agency, compo-
nent, or element concerned cannot affordably or 
practically be used or modified to meet the re-
690 
† HR 1540 PP
quirements to be met through the obligation of 
funds. 
(B) UNDER PERFORMANCE PLAN.—An ap-
proval of the obligation of funds may not be 
granted under paragraph (1)(B) unless the offi-
cial granting the approval determines that— 
(i) existing resources of the Depart-
ment do not meet the operation require-
ments to be met through the obligation of 
funds; and 
(ii) the proposed obligation is in ac-
cordance with the performance standards 
and measures established by the Chief Infor-
mation Officer of the Department under 
subsection (b). 
(3) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the 
end of each calendar quarter, each Chief Information 
Officer of a component of the Department who grants 
an approval under paragraph (1) during such cal-
endar quarter shall submit to the Chief Information 
Officer of the Department a report on the approval or 
approvals so granted during such calendar quarter. 
(b) PERFORMANCE PLAN
FOR REDUCTION
OF RE-
SOURCES REQUIRED FOR DATA SERVERS AND CENTERS.— 
(1) COMPONENT PLANS.—
691 
† HR 1540 PP
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 
15, 2012, the Secretaries of the military depart-
ments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall 
each submit to the Chief Information Officer of 
the Department a plan for the department or 
agency concerned to achieve the following: 
(i) A reduction in the square feet of 
floor space devoted to information systems 
technologies, attendant support technologies, 
and operations within data centers. 
(ii) A reduction in the use of all utili-
ties necessary to power and cool informa-
tion systems technologies and data centers. 
(iii) An increase in multi-organiza-
tional utilization of data centers, informa-
tion systems technologies, and associated re-
sources. 
(iv) A reduction in the investment for 
capital infrastructure or equipment re-
quired to support data centers as measured 
in cost per megawatt of data storage. 
(v) A reduction in the number of com-
mercial and government developed applica-
tions running on data servers and within 
data centers.
692 
† HR 1540 PP
(vi) A reduction in the number of gov-
ernment and vendor provided full-time 
equivalent personnel, and in the cost of 
labor, associated with the operation of data 
servers and data centers. 
(B) SPECIFICATION
OF
REQUIRED
ELE-
MENTS.—The Chief Information Officer of the 
Department shall specify the particular perform-
ance standards and measures and implementa-
tion elements to be included in the plans sub-
mitted under this paragraph, including specific 
goals and schedules for achieving the matters 
specified in subparagraph (A). 
(2) DEFENSE-WIDE PLAN.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 
2012, the Chief Information Officer of the De-
partment shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a performance plan for a reduc-
tion in the resources required for data centers 
and information systems technologies Depart-
ment-wide. The plan shall be based upon and in-
corporate appropriate elements of the plans sub-
mitted under paragraph (1).
693 
† HR 1540 PP
(B) ELEMENTS.—The performance plan re-
quired under this paragraph shall include the 
following: 
(i) A Department-wide performance 
plan for achieving the matters specified in 
paragraph (1)(A), including performance 
standards and measures for data centers 
and information systems technologies, goals 
and schedules for achieving such matters, 
and an estimate of cost savings anticipated 
through implementation of the plan. 
(ii) A Department-wide strategy for 
each of the following: 
(I) Desktop, laptop, and mobile 
device virtualization. 
(II) Transitioning to cloud com-
puting. 
(III) Migration of Defense data 
and government-provided services from 
Department-owned and operated data 
centers to cloud computing services 
generally available within the private 
sector that provide a better capability 
at a lower cost with the same or great-
er degree of security.
694 
† HR 1540 PP
(IV) Utilization of private sector- 
managed security services for data cen-
ters and cloud computing services. 
(V) A finite set of metrics to accu-
rately and transparently report on 
data 
center 
infrastructure 
(space, 
power and cooling): age, cost, capacity, 
usage, energy efficiency and utiliza-
tion, accompanied with the aggregate 
data for each data center site in use by 
the Department in excess of 100 kilo-
watts of information technology power 
demand. 
(VI) Transitioning to just-in-time 
delivery of Department-owned data 
center infrastructure (space, power and 
cooling) through use of modular data 
center technology and integrated data 
center infrastructure management soft-
ware. 
(3) RESPONSIBILITY.—The Chief Information 
Officer of the Department shall discharge the respon-
sibility for establishing performance standards and 
measures for data centers and information systems
695 
† HR 1540 PP
technologies for purposes of this subsection. Such re-
sponsibility may not be delegated. 
(c) EXCEPTION.—The Chief Information Officer of the 
Department and the Chief Information Officer of the Office 
of the Director of National Intelligence may jointly exempt 
from the applicability of this section such intelligence com-
ponents of the Department of Defense (and the programs 
and activities thereof) that are funded through the National 
Intelligence Program (NIP) as the Chief Information Offi-
cers consider appropriate. 
(d) REPORTS ON COST SAVINGS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of 
each fiscal year, and ending in fiscal year 2016, the 
Chief Information Officer of the Department shall 
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 
report on the cost savings, cost reductions, cost 
avoidances, and performance gains achieved, and an-
ticipated to be achieved, as of the date of such report 
as a result of activities undertaken under this section. 
(2) APPROPRIATE
COMMITTEES
OF
CONGRESS 
DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate 
committees of Congress’’ means— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Appropriations, and the Select 
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
696 
† HR 1540 PP
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the 
Committee on Appropriations, and the Perma-
nent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
House of Representatives. 
SEC. 2833. REDESIGNATION OF MIKE O’CALLAGHAN FED-
ERAL 
HOSPITAL 
IN 
NEVADA 
AS 
MIKE 
O’CALLAGHAN FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER. 
(a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 2867 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 2806), as amended 
by section 8135(a) of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 1997 (section 101(b) of division A of the Omnibus 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104– 
208; 110 Stat. 3009–118)), is further amended by striking 
‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital’’ each place it appears 
and inserting ‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such 
section 2867 is amended to read as follows:
697 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘SEC. 2867. MIKE O’CALLAGHAN FEDERAL MEDICAL CEN-
TER.’’. 
DIVISION 
C—DEPARTMENT 
OF 
ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE 
XXXI—DEPARTMENT 
OF 
ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 
PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—National Security 
Programs Authorizations 
SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRA-
TION. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are 
hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of 
Energy for fiscal year 2012 for the activities of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs 
as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.— 
From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available 
for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy 
may carry out the following new plant project for the Na-
tional Nuclear Security Administration: 
Project 12–D–301, Transuranic (TRU) Waste 
Facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Ala-
mos, New Mexico, $13,481,000.
698 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2012 for defense envi-
ronmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as 
specified in the funding table in section 4601. 
SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2012 for other defense 
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the fund-
ing table in section 4601. 
Subtitle 
B—Program 
Authoriza-
tions, Restrictions, and Limita-
tions 
SEC. 3111. REVIEW OF SECURITY VULNERABILITIES OF NA-
TIONAL LABORATORY COMPUTERS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4508 of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2659) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 4508. REVIEW OF SECURITY VULNERABILITIES OF NA-
TIONAL LABORATORY COMPUTERS. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy shall— 
‘‘(1) not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2012, and annually thereafter, review 
the security vulnerabilities of the computers of each 
national laboratory; and
699 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘(2) if, in conducting a review under paragraph 
(1), the Secretary discovers a significant vulnerability 
in a national laboratory computer, promptly notify 
the congressional defense committees of the vulner-
ability. 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—A notification submitted under sub-
section (a) with respect to a significant vulnerability of a 
national laboratory computer shall include the following: 
‘‘(1) A description of the vulnerability. 
‘‘(2) An assessment of the loss, if any, of classi-
fied or unclassified data as a result of the vulner-
ability. 
‘‘(3) An assessment of the harm to national secu-
rity or individual privacy resulting from the loss, if 
any, of such data. 
‘‘(4) A description of the actions taken to address 
the vulnerability. 
‘‘(c) NATIONAL LABORATORY DEFINED.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘national laboratory’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 4502(g)(3).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 
the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 4508 and inserting the following 
new item: 
‘‘Sec. 4508. Review of security vulnerabilities of national laboratory computers.’’.
700 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 3112. REVIEW BY SECRETARY OF ENERGY AND SEC-
RETARY OF DEFENSE OF COMPTROLLER GEN-
ERAL ASSESSMENT OF BUDGET REQUESTS 
WITH RESPECT TO THE MODERNIZATION AND 
REFURBISHMENT OF THE NUCLEAR SECU-
RITY COMPLEX. 
Section 3255(a) of the National Nuclear Security Ad-
ministration Act (50 U.S.C. 2455(a)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Energy shall, in consultation 
with the Secretary of Defense— 
‘‘(A) review the report submitted by the Comp-
troller General under paragraph (2); and 
‘‘(B) not later than 30 days after receiving that 
report, submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report that includes— 
‘‘(i) the results of the review conducted 
under subparagraph (A); 
‘‘(ii) the views of the Secretary of Energy 
and the Secretary of Defense with respect to— 
‘‘(I) the findings of the Comptroller 
General in the report submitted under para-
graph (2); and 
‘‘(II) whether the actual funding level 
for the fiscal year in which the report is 
submitted under this subparagraph is suffi-
701 
† HR 1540 PP
cient for the modernization of the nuclear 
security complex and the refurbishment of 
the nuclear weapons stockpile; and 
‘‘(iii) a description of any measures the Ad-
ministration plans to take in response to the 
findings of the Comptroller General.’’. 
SEC. 3113. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT. 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated and 
made available for obligation under section 3101 for weap-
ons activities for any fiscal year before fiscal year 2013, 
the Secretary of Energy may procure not more than one 
aircraft. 
SEC. 3114. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISH-
MENT OF CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN COUN-
TRIES OUTSIDE OF THE FORMER SOVIET 
UNION. 
Not more than $500,000 of the funds authorized to be 
appropriated by section 3101 and made available by the 
funding table in section 4601 for defense nuclear non-
proliferation activities may be obligated or expended to es-
tablish a center of excellence in a country that is not a state 
of the former Soviet Union until the date that is 15 days 
after the date on which the Administrator for Nuclear Secu-
rity submits to the congressional defense committees a re-
port that includes the following:
702 
† HR 1540 PP
(1) An identification of the country in which the 
center will be located. 
(2) A description of the purpose for which the 
center will be established. 
(3) The agreement under which the center will 
operate. 
(4) A funding plan for the center, including— 
(A) the amount of funds to be provided by 
the government of the country in which the cen-
ter will be located; and 
(B) the percentage of the total cost of estab-
lishing and operating the center the funds de-
scribed in subparagraph (A) will cover. 
SEC. 3115. RECOGNITION AND STATUS OF NATIONAL ATOM-
IC TESTING MUSEUM. 
Section 3137 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (42 U.S.C. 7142) is 
amended— 
(1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘AND 
NATIONAL
ATOMIC
TESTING
MUSEUM’’ after 
‘‘ATOMIC MUSEUM’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new sub-
section: 
‘‘(d) RECOGNITION AND STATUS OF NATIONAL ATOMIC 
TESTING MUSEUM.—The museum operated by the Nevada
703 
† HR 1540 PP
Test Site Historical Foundation and located in Las Vegas, 
Nevada— 
‘‘(1) is recognized as the official atomic testing 
museum of the United Sates; 
‘‘(2) shall be known as the ‘National Atomic 
Testing Museum’; and 
‘‘(3) shall have the sole right throughout the 
United States and its possessions to have and use the 
name ‘National Atomic Testing Museum’.’’. 
Subtitle C—Reports 
SEC. 3121. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF FEDERALIZING THE 
SECURITY PROTECTIVE FORCES CONTRACT 
GUARD WORKFORCE AT CERTAIN DEPART-
MENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy 
and the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall jointly 
submit to the congressional defense committees— 
(1) a report on the feasibility of federalizing 
some or all of the security protective forces contract 
guard workforce at the facilities specified in sub-
section (d); and 
(2) the comments of the Comptroller General of 
the United States on that report required under sub-
section (b).
704 
† HR 1540 PP
(b) COMMENTS
BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL.—The 
Secretary and the Administrator shall provide the draft text 
of the report required by subsection (a)(1) to the Comp-
troller General of the United States for review and comment 
before submitting the report to the congressional defense 
committees. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection 
(a)(1) shall include the following: 
(1) An evaluation of the feasibility of converting 
the security protective forces contract workforce at the 
facilities specified in subsection (d) into a force made 
up, in whole or in part, of full-time Federal employ-
ees. 
(2) An estimate of the immediate and projected 
costs of any such conversion. 
(3) An estimate of the immediate and projected 
costs of maintaining guards under contract status 
and of maintaining guards as full-time Federal em-
ployee. 
(4) An assessment of the effects of any such con-
version on security, including an analysis of the ef-
fects of using a Federal security guard, a Federal po-
lice officer, or a Federal protective service officer in-
stead of a contract guard.
705 
† HR 1540 PP
(5) An estimate of the hourly and annual costs 
of— 
(A) contract guards, including benefits and 
overtime; and 
(B) any comparably trained and equipped 
Federal force with comparable physical and 
other requirements. 
(6) A comparison of similar conversions of large 
groups of contract workers to full-time Federal em-
ployees and an assessment of the potential benefits 
and challenges of such conversions. 
(7) The views of the Secretary and the Adminis-
trator on the feasibility of— 
(A) converting the security protective forces 
contract workforce at the facilities specified in 
subsection (d) into a force made up, in whole or 
in part, of full-time Federal employees; 
(B) maintaining the security protective 
forces contract workforce in its current form; and 
(C) instituting some or all of the changes 
recommended in the Implementation Plan for the 
29 Recommendations of the Protective Force Ca-
reer Options Study Group prepared pursuant to 
the Report of the Committee on Appropriations 
of the House of Representatives (House Report
708 
† HR 1540 PP
(19) The National Savannah River Site Office 
and the Tritium Extraction Facility and Mixed 
Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility of the National Nu-
clear Security Administration, Aiken, South Caro-
lina. 
(20) The Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Of-
fice and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Sites. 
(21) The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, 
New Mexico. 
(22) The Y–12 Site Office and the Y–12 National 
Security Complex of the National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 
SEC. 3122. COMPTROLLER GENERAL STUDY ON OVERSIGHT 
OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEFENSE NU-
CLEAR FACILITIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the 
United States shall conduct a study of the value of and the 
need for external regulation or external oversight of the safe-
ty of nuclear operations and the design and construction 
of nuclear facilities at the Department of Energy defense 
nuclear facilities to protect the public health and safety. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The study required by subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) An assessment of the value of and the need 
for external regulation or external oversight, or a
709 
† HR 1540 PP
combination of both, of the safety of nuclear oper-
ations and the design and construction of nuclear fa-
cilities at the Department of Energy defense nuclear 
facilities. 
(2) An assessment of the ability of existing regu-
latory authorities to regulate safety at the Depart-
ment of Energy defense nuclear facilities. 
(3) An assessment of the ability of the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board to regulate safety at 
the Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities. 
(4) An assessment of the current functions of the 
Board and whether those functions should be modified 
or amended, including whether the Department of 
Energy should pay an oversight fee to the Board. 
(5) An assessment of the relative advantages and 
disadvantages to the Department of Energy and the 
public of— 
(A) continuing the oversight functions of the 
Board; or 
(B) replacing the oversight functions of the 
Board with external regulation of some or all of 
the Department of Energy defense nuclear facili-
ties. 
(6) A list of all existing or planned Department 
of Energy defense nuclear facilities that are similar
710 
† HR 1540 PP
to facilities under the regulatory jurisdiction of the 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 
(7)(A) A list of each existing Department of En-
ergy defense nuclear facility or activity relating to 
such a facility that the Comptroller General rec-
ommends should— 
(i) remain within the oversight jurisdiction 
of the Board for a period of time or indefinitely; 
or 
(ii) be transferred to the jurisdiction of an 
outside regulatory authority; and 
(B) the basis for the recommendations of the 
Comptroller General. 
(8) For any existing Department of Energy de-
fense nuclear facilities that the Comptroller General 
recommends should be transferred to the jurisdiction 
of an outside regulatory authority— 
(A) the date by which that transfer should 
occur and the period of time necessary for the 
transfer; and 
(B) whether the regulatory authority should 
be an existing or new regulatory authority. 
(9) A list of any proposed Department of Energy 
defense nuclear facilities and a recommendation of the
711 
† HR 1540 PP
Comptroller General with respect to whether each such 
facility— 
(A) should come under the oversight juris-
diction of the Board or be transferred to the ju-
risdiction of an outside regulatory authority; 
and 
(B) if the Comptroller General recommends 
that the facility be transferred to the jurisdiction 
of any outside regulatory authority, whether the 
regulatory authority should be an existing or 
new regulatory authority. 
(10) An assessment of the comparative advan-
tages and disadvantages to the Department of Energy 
and to public health and safety of the transfer of some 
or all of the Department of Energy defense nuclear fa-
cilities from the oversight jurisdiction of the Board to 
the jurisdiction of an outside regulatory authority. 
(11) An assessment of the comparative costs asso-
ciated with external oversight or external regulation 
of safety at Department of Energy defense nuclear fa-
cilities. 
(12) Any other recommendations of the Comp-
troller General with respect to external regulation or 
oversight of safety at the Department of Energy.
712 
† HR 1540 PP
(c) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller Gen-
eral shall submit to the congressional defense committees an 
interim report on the status of the study conducted under 
subsection (a). 
(d) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the 
Secretary of Energy, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the final 
report of the Comptroller General that contains the findings 
and recommendations of the Comptroller General resulting 
from the study conducted under subsection (a). 
(e) COMMENTS ON REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 
after receiving the final report from the Comptroller Gen-
eral under subsection (d), the Secretary of Energy, the De-
fense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and the Nuclear Reg-
ulatory Commission shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees the comments of the Secretary, the Board, 
or the Commission (as the case may be) on the report. 
(f) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEFENSE NUCLEAR FA-
CILITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Department 
of Energy defense nuclear facility’’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 
(42 U.S.C. 2286g).
713 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 3123. PLAN TO COMPLETE THE GLOBAL INITIATIVES 
FOR PROLIFERATION PREVENTION PROGRAM 
IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 
At or about the same time that the budget of the Presi-
dent for fiscal year 2013 is submitted to Congress under 
section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Admin-
istrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to Congress a 
plan to complete the Global Initiatives for Proliferation 
Prevention program in the Russian Federation by the end 
of calendar year 2013. 
TITLE 
XXXII—DEFENSE 
NU-
CLEAR 
FACILITIES 
SAFETY 
BOARD 
SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION. 
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2012, $33,317,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic En-
ergy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq). 
SEC. 3202. AUTHORITY OF THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILI-
TIES SAFETY BOARD TO REVIEW THE FACIL-
ITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CON-
STRUCTION PROJECT 10–D–904 OF THE NA-
TIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRA-
TION. 
Notwithstanding section 318(1)(A) of the Atomic En-
ergy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g(1)(A)), the Defense Nu-
714 
† HR 1540 PP
clear Facilities Safety Board shall exercise the authority of 
the Board under section 312(a)(4) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 
2286a(a)(4)) to review the design of, and review and mon-
itor construction with respect to, Construction Project 10– 
D–904 of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 
TITLE XXXIII—MARITIME 
ADMINISTRATION 
SEC. 3301. MARITIME ADMINISTRATION. 
Section 109 of title 49, United States Code, is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 109. Maritime Administration 
‘‘(a) ORGANIZATION.—The Maritime Administration 
is an administration in the Department of Transportation. 
‘‘(b) MARITIME ADMINISTRATOR.—The head of the 
Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, 
who is appointed by the President by and with the advice 
and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report 
directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out 
the duties prescribed by the Secretary. 
‘‘(c) DEPUTY MARITIME ADMINISTRATOR.—The Mari-
time Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Admin-
istrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the 
Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The 
Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed 
by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be
715 
† HR 1540 PP
Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of 
the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates an-
other individual, during a vacancy in the office of Adminis-
trator. 
‘‘(d) DUTIES AND POWERS VESTED IN SECRETARY.— 
All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are 
vested in the Secretary. 
‘‘(e) REGIONAL OFFICES.—The Maritime Administra-
tion shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great 
Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other re-
gional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a 
qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The 
Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and pro-
grams of the Maritime Administration through the regional 
offices. 
‘‘(f) INTERAGENCY AND INDUSTRY RELATIONS.—The 
Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other 
agencies, and with representative trade organizations 
throughout the United States, concerned with the transpor-
tation of commodities by water in the export and import 
foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of 
securing preference to vessels of the United States for the 
transportation of those commodities. 
‘‘(g) DETAILING OFFICERS FROM ARMED FORCES.— 
To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers
716 
† HR 1540 PP
relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than 
five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Sec-
retary at any one time, in addition to details authorized 
by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Sec-
retary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added 
to the officer’s pay and allowances as an officer in the 
armed forces, makes the officer’s total pay and allowances 
equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual 
performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar 
importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed 
by the officer during the detail. 
‘‘(h) CONTRACTS, COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, AND 
AUDITS.— 
‘‘(1) CONTRACTS
AND
COOPERATIVE
AGREE-
MENTS.—In the same manner that a private corpora-
tion may make a contract within the scope of its au-
thority under its charter, the Secretary may make 
contracts and cooperative agreements for the United 
States Government and disburse amounts to— 
‘‘(A) carry out the Secretary’s duties and 
powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, 
and all other Maritime Administration pro-
grams; and 
‘‘(B) protect, preserve, and improve collat-
eral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness.
717 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘(2) AUDITS.—The financial transactions of the 
Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the 
Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall 
allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary 
because of the nature of the business activities author-
ized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least 
once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to 
Congress any departure by the Secretary from this 
section or subtitle V of title 46. 
‘‘(i) GRANT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Except as 
otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related 
expenses for the administration of any grant programs by 
the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent. 
‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided 
in this subsection, there are authorized to be appro-
priated such amounts as may be necessary to carry 
out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to 
the Maritime Administration. 
‘‘(2) LIMITATIONS.—Only those amounts specifi-
cally authorized by law may be appropriated for the 
use of the Maritime Administration for— 
‘‘(A) acquisition, construction, or recon-
struction of vessels;
718 
† HR 1540 PP
‘‘(B) construction-differential subsidies inci-
dent to the construction, reconstruction, or recon-
ditioning of vessels; 
‘‘(C) costs of national defense features; 
‘‘(D) payments of obligations incurred for 
operating-differential subsidies; 
‘‘(E) expenses necessary for research and de-
velopment activities, including reimbursement of 
the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses 
resulting from expenses of experimental vessel op-
erations; 
‘‘(F) the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund; 
‘‘(G) National Defense Reserve Fleet ex-
penses; 
‘‘(H) expenses necessary to carry out part B 
of subtitle V of title 46; and 
‘‘(I) other operations and training expenses 
related to the development of waterborne trans-
portation systems, the use of waterborne trans-
portation systems, and general administration. 
‘‘(3) TRAINING VESSELS.—Amounts may not be 
appropriated for the purchase or construction of 
training vessels for State maritime academies unless 
the Secretary has approved a plan for sharing train-
ing vessels between State maritime academies.’’.
719 
† HR 1540 PP
DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 
SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TA-
BLES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Whenever a funding table in this 
division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, 
program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the 
specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity 
is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appro-
priations. 
(b) MERIT-BASED DECISIONS.—Decisions by agency 
heads to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a 
specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized 
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be based on authorized, 
transparent, statutory criteria, or merit-based selection pro-
cedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 
2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, and other 
applicable provisions of law. 
(c) RELATIONSHIP TO TRANSFER AND PROGRAMMING 
AUTHORITY.—An amount specified in the funding tables in 
this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under 
a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another 
provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or re-
programming of an amount specified in such funding tables 
shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or 
reprogrammings under section 1001 of this Act or any other
721 
† HR 1540 PP
TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 
UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT ........................................................................................
14,572 
14,572 
C–12 CARGO AIRPLANE .........................................................................................
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ............................................................
539,574 
Terminate EMARRS ...............................................................................................
[–539,574 ] 
MQ–1 UAV ...................................................................................................................
658,798 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–658,798 ] 
RQ–11 (RAVEN) .........................................................................................................
70,762 
58,862 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–11,900 ] 
BCT UNMANNED AERIAL VEH (UAVS) INCR 1 ...............................................
HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ..............................................................
250,415 
250,415 
AH–64 BLOCK II/WRA .............................................................................................
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN .................................................................
572,155 
395,155 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–177,000 ] 
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN .................................................................
–161,150 
–161,150 
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN .................................................................
192,764 
192,764 
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD ........................................................
104,263 
104,263 
UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ..............................................................
1,426,198 
1,418,198 
Unjustified program management growth .............................................................
[–8,000 ] 
UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ..............................................................
–100,532 
–100,532 
UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ..............................................................
199,781 
199,781 
CH–47 HELICOPTER ...............................................................................................
1,363,116 
1,297,116 
Army requested transfer to APA Line 15 for correct execution ...........................
[–66,000 ] 
CH–47 HELICOPTER ...............................................................................................
–57,756 
–57,756 
CH–47 HELICOPTER ...............................................................................................
54,956 
120,956 
Army requested transfer from APA Line 14 for correct execution ......................
[66,000 ] 
HELICOPTER NEW TRAINING .............................................................................
KIOWA WARRIOR UPGRADE (OH–58 D)/WRA .................................................
C12 AIRCRAFT MODS ..............................................................................................
MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS ............................................................................................
136,183 
Administration recommendation ............................................................................
[–29,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–107,183 ] 
MQ–1 WEAPONIZATION—UAS .............................................................................
GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ......................................................................................
27,575 
27,575 
MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ....................................................................
8,362 
8,362 
AH–64 MODS ..............................................................................................................
331,230 
331,230 
AH–64 MODS ..............................................................................................................
CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) .......................................................
79,712 
57,012 
Cargo and ballistic protection contract delays ......................................................
[–22,700 ] 
CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) .......................................................
UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .....................................................................
22,107 
12,107 
Contract delays ........................................................................................................
[–10,000 ] 
AIRCRAFT LONG RANGE MODS ..........................................................................
UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS ..............................................................................
80,745 
74,745 
Contract delays ........................................................................................................
[–6,000 ] 
KIOWA WARRIOR .....................................................................................................
162,052 
162,052 
AIRBORNE AVIONICS .............................................................................................
NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN ...........................................................................
138,832 
136,432 
Aviation Data Exploitation Capability ahead of need ........................................
[–2,400 ] 
COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ..............................................................................
132,855 
117,855 
JTRS Integreation ahead of need ...........................................................................
[–15,000 ] 
GATM ROLLUP ..........................................................................................................
105,519 
105,519 
RQ–7 UAV MODS .......................................................................................................
126,239 
76,239 
Administration recommendation ............................................................................
[–50,000 ] 
SPARE PARTS (AIR) ................................................................................................
AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................
35,993 
35,993 
SURVIVABILITY CM .................................................................................................
CMWS ...........................................................................................................................
162,811 
104,251 
Production and installation contract delays .........................................................
[–58,560 ] 
AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................................
4,840 
4,840 
COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT .........................................................................
176,212 
95,417 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–19,100 ] 
Aviation Light Utility Mobile Maintenance (ALUMMC) no longer required ....
[–3,287 ] 
Aviation Sets, Kits, Outfits, Tools contract delay ................................................
[–58,408 ] 
AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS ....................................................................
82,883 
62,746 
Air Soldier System early to need ...........................................................................
[–20,137 ] 
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .........................................................................................
114,844 
102,444 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–12,400 ] 
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .....................................................................................
1,593 
1,593
722 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .....................................................................................
2,878 
2,878 
AIRBORNE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY .......................................
7,061,381 
5,251,934 
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 
PATRIOT SYSTEM SUMMARY ..............................................................................
662,231 
662,231 
MSE MISSILE ............................................................................................................
74,953 
74,953 
SURFACE-LAUNCHED AMRAAM SYSTEM SUMMARY: ..................................
SURFACE-LAUNCHED AMRAAM SYSTEM SUMMARY: ..................................
HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ....................................................................................
1,410 
1,410 
JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY ...........................................................
160,767 
140,767 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–20,000 ] 
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ....................................................................................
84,108 
81,108 
Unit cost efficiencies ................................................................................................
[–3,000 ] 
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ....................................................................................
–22,432 
–22,432 
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ....................................................................................
19,886 
19,886 
BCT NON LINE OF SIGHT LAUNCH SYSTEM—INCREM .............................
GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ......................................................................
314,167 
164,167 
Program reduction ...................................................................................................
[–150,000 ] 
MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) ..............................
18,175 
18,175 
HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS ........................
31,674 
20,674 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–11,000 ] 
PATRIOT MODS ........................................................................................................
66,925 
66,925 
STINGER MODS ........................................................................................................
14,495 
–5 
Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 23801A
...................................
[–14,500 ] 
ITAS/TOW MODS .......................................................................................................
13,577 
13,577 
MLRS MODS ...............................................................................................................
8,236 
8,236 
HIMARS MODIFICATIONS .....................................................................................
11,670 
11,670 
HELLFIRE MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ..............................................................................
8,700 
8,700 
AIR DEFENSE TARGETS .......................................................................................
3,674 
3,674 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ..............................................................
1,459 
1,459 
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ............................................................................
5,043 
5,043 
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ............................................
1,478,718 
1,280,218 
PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 
STRYKER VEHICLE ................................................................................................
632,994 
606,894 
Prior year unobligated funds available .................................................................
[–26,100 ] 
FUTURE COMBAT SYSTEMS: (FCS) ...................................................................
FUTURE COMBAT SYSTEMS: (FCS) ...................................................................
FCS SPIN OUTS ........................................................................................................
FCS SPIN OUTS ........................................................................................................
FCS SPIN OUTS ........................................................................................................
STRYKER (MOD) .......................................................................................................
52,797 
51,497 
Excess program management ..................................................................................
[–1,300 ] 
FIST VEHICLE (MOD) .............................................................................................
43,962 
35,162 
Funding ahead of need ............................................................................................
[–8,800 ] 
BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .................................................................................
250,710 
250,710 
HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ..............................................
46,876 
46,876 
IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ...............................
10,452 
6,452 
Excess contractor engineering .................................................................................
[–4,000 ] 
ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE .........................................................................
99,904 
95,904 
Unjustified growth in matrix support and engineering change proposals .........
[–4,000 ] 
M88 FOV MODS .........................................................................................................
32,483 
32,483 
JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ......................................................................................
M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) ......................................................................................
160,578 
131,178 
Unjustified technical support costs .........................................................................
[–29,400 ] 
ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM ............................................................................
181,329 
421,329 
Program increase to add 49 tanks to bridge production gap ..............................
[240,000 ] 
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) ....................................................
1,073 
1,073 
HOWITZER, LIGHT, TOWED, 105MM, M119 ......................................................
INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY .................................
16,046 
Transfer at Army’s request to RDTE, Army PE 64601A ....................................
[–16,046 ] 
M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM) ...........................................................
MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL ......................................................................
65,102 
Transfer at Army request to WTCV line 34 ..........................................................
[–34,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–31,102 ] 
LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN .................................................
28,796 
13,931 
Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 64601A
...................................
[–1,700 ] 
Army revised lower quantity ..................................................................................
[–13,165 ] 
M249 SAW MACHINE GUN (5.56MM) ...................................................................
MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN (40MM) ........................................................
MORTAR SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................
12,477 
10,177 
Excess production engineering ................................................................................
[–2,300 ] 
M107, CAL. 50, SNIPER RIFLE ..............................................................................
XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ..............................................
12,055 
12,055
723 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
M110 SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM (SASS) .........................................
M4 CARBINE ..............................................................................................................
35,015 
35,015 
SHOTGUN, MODULAR ACCESSORY SYSTEM (MASS) ...................................
6,707 
4,207 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–2,500 ] 
COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION (CRO ....................
HANDGUN ..................................................................................................................
HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) ..............................................................................
13,066 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–13,066 ] 
MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS ..........................................................
M4 CARBINE MODS .................................................................................................
25,092 
25,092 
M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................................................
14,856 
Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 19 .....................................................
[34,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–48,856 ] 
M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................................................
8,480 
8,480 
M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................................
15,718 
15,718 
SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................
1,994 
1,994 
M119 MODIFICATIONS ............................................................................................
38,701 
38,701 
M16 RIFLE MODS .....................................................................................................
3,476 
3,476 
M14 7.62 RIFLE MODS ............................................................................................
MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .......................................
2,973 
2,973 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ..........................................................
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) ................................................
10,080 
10,080 
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................
424 
424 
SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ......................................
2,453 
2,453 
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (WTCV) ...............................................................
106,843 
106,843 
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .......................................
1,933,512 
1,971,177 
PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 
CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................................
210,758 
210,758 
CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................................
83,730 
83,730 
CTG, 7.62MM, 4 BALL M80 FS, 1 DIM TRCR M276, ..........................................
CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ................................................................................
9,064 
7,064 
Funding ahead of need. ...........................................................................................
[–2,000 ] 
CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ......................................................................................
131,775 
131,775 
CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................
CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................
14,894 
10,594 
Army offered reduction. ...........................................................................................
[–4,300 ] 
OBJECTIVE FAMILY OF WEAPONS AMMUNITION, ALL T ..........................
3,399 
Funding ahead of need. ...........................................................................................
[–3,399 ] 
CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................
118,966 
105,966 
Program growth adjustment. ..................................................................................
[–13,000 ] 
CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................
84,799 
34,799 
Army offered reduction. ...........................................................................................
[–50,000 ] 
CTG, CAL .300 WIN MAG, MK 248 MOD 0 (7.62X67M .......................................
60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................................
31,287 
31,287 
81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................................
12,187 
12,187 
120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ...............................................................................
108,416 
98,416 
Army offered reduction. ...........................................................................................
[–10,000 ] 
CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES ................................
105,704 
105,205 
Unjustified request. ..................................................................................................
[–499 ] 
CTG, TANK, 120MM, ALL TYPES ..........................................................................
ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM AND 105MM, ALL TYP .............................
103,227 
103,227 
CTG, ARTY, 105MM: ALL TYPES ...........................................................................
ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ..............................................
32,887 
32,887 
PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 ..........................................................
69,074 
48,074 
Program restructure. ...............................................................................................
[–21,000 ] 
ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ..........................
48,205 
46,705 
Pricing adjustment. .................................................................................................
[–1,500 ] 
ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES ........................................................................
MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES ..................................................
2,518 
2,518 
MINE, CLEARING CHARGE, ALL TYPES ...........................................................
SPIDER NETWORK MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................
43,123 
15,423 
Full rate production delay. .....................................................................................
[–27,700 ] 
SCORPION, INTELLIGENT MUNITIONS SYSTEM , ALL ...............................
SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .......................................
19,254 
17,854 
Excess production engineering. ...............................................................................
[–1,400 ] 
ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................................
127,265 
127,265 
DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ............................................................
53,685 
53,685 
GRENADES, ALL TYPES ........................................................................................
42,558 
40,558 
Grenade Rifle Entry Munition—Army offered reduction. ...................................
[–2,000 ] 
SIGNALS, ALL TYPES .............................................................................................
26,173 
26,173 
SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ....................................................................................
14,108 
6,108 
Army offered reduction—M115A2 Simulators ......................................................
[–4,000 ] 
Army offered reduction—M116A1 Simulators ......................................................
[–4,000 ] 
ALL OTHER (AMMO) ...............................................................................................
AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES ......................................................................
18,296 
18,296 
NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES .........................................................
14,864 
14,864
724 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ..............................................................................................
5,449 
5,449 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..........................................................................
11,009 
11,009 
AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .............................................................
24,200 
24,200 
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) ........................................
13,711 
13,711 
CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES .......................................................................................
103 
103 
PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................................
199,841 
199,841 
LAYAWAY OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ..........................................................
9,451 
9,451 
MAINTENANCE OF INACTIVE FACILITIES ......................................................
5,533 
1,533 
Army offered reduction. ...........................................................................................
[–4,000 ] 
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL ............................
189,789 
177,789 
Contract award delay. .............................................................................................
[–12,000 ] 
ARMS INITIATIVE ....................................................................................................
3,273 
3,273 
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ........................
1,992,625 
1,831,827 
OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 
TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS ...................................................................
SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ..................................................................................
13,496 
596 
Early to need ............................................................................................................
[–12,900 ] 
SEMITRAILERS, TANKERS ...................................................................................
HI MOB MULTI-PURP WHLD VEH (HMMWV) .................................................
FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) ................................................
432,936 
422,936 
Unjustified program management cost growth .....................................................
[–10,000 ] 
FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ................................
21,930 
21,930 
FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ........................................
627,294 
555,294 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–72,000 ] 
PLS ESP ......................................................................................................................
251,667 
251,667 
ARMORED SECURITY VEHICLES (ASV) ...........................................................
MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY .............................................................
56,671 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–48,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–8,671 ] 
FAMILY OF MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTEC (MRAP) .........................
TRUCK, TRACTOR, LINE HAUL, M915/M916 .....................................................
1,461 
Prior year unobligated funds available .................................................................
[–1,461 ] 
HVY EZPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV ............................
156,747 
156,747 
HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM .........................................................
161,631 
4,313 
Funding provided in approved prior year reprogramming action .....................
[–157,318 ] 
TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ...................................
39,908 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–39,908 ] 
MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .....................................................................
362,672 
344,772 
HMMWV installation early to need .......................................................................
[–3,900 ] 
Excessive program support costs ............................................................................
[–14,000 ] 
MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ...........................
142,862 
Excessive program support costs ............................................................................
[–15,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–127,862 ] 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (TAC VEH) ................................................................
TOWING DEVICE-FIFTH WHEEL ........................................................................
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS, OPA1 ...............................................................................
20,156 
Unjustified request ...................................................................................................
[–20,156 ] 
HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN .....................................................................................
1,161 
1,161 
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ...................................................................
3,222 
3,222 
NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ....................................................................
19,869 
19,869 
JOINT COMBAT IDENTIFICATION MARKING SYSTEM ................................
9,984 
9,984 
WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ..........................................
974,186 
865,186 
Increment 2 contract delay .....................................................................................
[–109,000 ] 
JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ........................................................................
4,826 
4,826 
DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ...........................
123,859 
123,859 
SHF TERM .................................................................................................................
8,910 
8,910 
SAT TERM, EMUT (SPACE) ...................................................................................
NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) .....................................
29,568 
25,168 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–4,400 ] 
SMART-T (SPACE) ....................................................................................................
49,704 
49,704 
SCAMP (SPACE) ........................................................................................................
2,415 
2,415 
GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ................................................................................
73,374 
64,774 
Excessive unit cost growth ......................................................................................
[–8,600 ] 
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) .....................................................................
31,799 
31,799 
MOD-IN-SERVICE PROFILER ...............................................................................
969 
969 
ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) .............................................
18,788 
18,788 
ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) ..................................
3,994 
3,994 
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ......................................................................
775,832 
206,087 
Ground Mobile Radio program restructure ...........................................................
[–153,833 ] 
Airborne, Maritime, Fixed Station program delay ..............................................
[–108,000 ] 
Manpack radio program delay ...............................................................................
[–256,912 ] 
Army requested transfer to RDTE Navy line 100 ................................................
[–51,000 ] 
RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) ................................................................
8,336 
8,336 
SINCGARS FAMILY ..................................................................................................
4,992 
500 
Prior year unobligated funds available .................................................................
[–4,492 ] 
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ..............................................................................
725 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
TRACTOR DESK .......................................................................................................
10,827 
10,827 
COMMS-ELEC EQUIP FIELDING .........................................................................
SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT ..........................................................
36,224 
14,024 
Program delay ..........................................................................................................
[–22,200 ] 
IMS REMOTE CONTROL UNIT .............................................................................
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS ....................
1,843 
1,843 
COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR (CSEL) ............................................
GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) ............................................................
3,939 
3,939 
RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY ............................................................
38,535 
29,435 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–9,100 ] 
MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE (MC4) ......................................
26,232 
26,232 
CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE .....................................................................
1,547 
1,547 
RESERVE CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT ...............................................................
28,266 
28,266 
TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) .................................................................
12,541 
11,441 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–1,100 ] 
INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP ....................................
39,349 
39,349 
TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION ...........................................................................
2,232 
2,232 
BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................
37,780 
37,780 
WW TECH CON IMP PROG (WWTCIP) ................................................................
12,805 
12,805 
INFORMATION SYSTEMS .......................................................................................
187,227 
131,227 
Prior year unobligated funds available .................................................................
[–56,000 ] 
DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) .................................................................
4,393 
4,393 
INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM( .......................
310,761 
310,761 
PENTAGON INFORMATION MGT AND TELECOM ...........................................
4,992 
4,992 
JTT/CIBS-M ................................................................................................................
4,657 
4,657 
PROPHET GROUND .................................................................................................
72,041 
72,041 
DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC SPT SYS (DTSS) .......................................................
DRUG INTERDICTION PROGRAM (DIP) (TIARA) ...........................................
DCGS-A (MIP) ............................................................................................................
144,548 
unjustified growth ....................................................................................................
[–20,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–124,548 ] 
JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) ................................................
1,199 
1,199 
TROJAN (MIP) ...........................................................................................................
32,707 
32,707 
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) .....................................................
9,163 
9,163 
CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) (MIP ...........................
3,493 
3,493 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP) ..........................................................................
802 
802 
LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ...................................................
33,810 
Requirement met with prior year funds ................................................................
[–33,810 ] 
CREW ...........................................................................................................................
24,104 
Requirement met with prior year funds ................................................................
[–24,104 ] 
BCT UNATTENDED GROUND SENSOR ..............................................................
FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITES .........................
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES .....................
1,252 
1,252 
CI MODERNIZATION ...............................................................................................
1,332 
1,332 
FAAD GBS ...................................................................................................................
7,958 
7,958 
SENTINEL MODS .....................................................................................................
41,657 
41,657 
SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) .............................................................
47,498 
47,498 
NIGHT VISION DEVICES ........................................................................................
156,204 
151,704 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–4,500 ] 
LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .....................
102,334 
102,334 
NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ............................................................
186,859 
143,059 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–43,800 ] 
SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF .................................
10,227 
8,027 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–2,200 ] 
RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS .................................................................
COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-RAM) .................................
15,774 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–15,774 ] 
BASE EXPEDITIONARY TARGETING AND SURV SYS ..................................
GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM ..........................................................
25,356 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–6,300 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–19,056 ] 
ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ...........................................................................
ENHANCED PORTABLE INDUCTIVE ARTILLERY FUZE SE ......................
PROFILER ..................................................................................................................
3,312 
3,312 
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ...........................................
3,005 
3,005 
FORCE XXI BATTLE CMD BRIGADE & BELOW (FBCB2) .............................
JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) ..........................................
69,514 
20,014 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–49,500 ] 
LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/RANGEFINDER ................................
58,042 
58,042 
100 
COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 ...........................................................
101 
MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .....................................................................
21,022 
21,022 
102 
COUNTERFIRE RADARS ........................................................................................
227,629 
170,529 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–57,100 ] 
103 
ENHANCED SENSOR & MONITORING SYSTEM ..............................................
2,226 
2,226 
104 
TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS ....................................................................
54,907 
54,907 
105 
FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ..................................................................................
54,223 
37,423 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–16,800 ] 
106 
BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (BC .....................
12,454 
7,754
726 
† HR 1540 PP
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Line 
Item 
FY 2012 
Request 
Senate 
Authorized 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–4,700 ] 
107 
FAAD C2 ......................................................................................................................
5,030 
5,030 
108 
AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ......................................
62,710 
54,910 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–7,800 ] 
109 
KNIGHT FAMILY ......................................................................................................
51,488 
32,202 
Program growth adjustment ...................................................................................
[–19,286 ] 
110 
LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) .....................................................
1,807 
1,807 
111 
AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ...............................................
28,924 
19,524 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–9,400 ] 
112 
TC AIMS II ..................................................................................................................
113 
TACTICAL INTERNET MANAGER ........................................................................
114 
NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE .......................
115 
MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ..............................................................
34,031 
34,031 
116 
SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..........................................
210,312 
124,026 
Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 177 ...............................................
[–9,251 ] 
Army requested transfer to OMA Budget Activity 04 ..........................................
[–60,240 ] 
Army requested transfer to OPA line 119 .............................................................
[–1,795 ] 
Army identified excess .............................................................................................
[–15,000 ] 
117 
RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ...........................
19,113 
19,113 
118 
MOUNTED BATTLE COMMAND ON THE MOVE (MBCOTM) ........................
119 
GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM ....................................
23,664 
25,459 
Army requested transfer from OPA line 116 .........................................................
[1,795 ] 
120 
ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ...................................................................
11,192 
11,192 
121 
AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP ........................................................
220,250 
174,772 
Prior year unobligated funds available .................................................................
[–45,478 ] 
122 
CSS COMMUNICATIONS .........................................................................................
39,310 
39,310 
123 
RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ......................................
41,248 
41,248 
124 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ............................................................................
10,437 
10,437 
125 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ....................................
7,480 
4,395 
Excessive design engineering costs ..........................................................................
[–3,085 ] 
126 
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) .................................................................
571 
571 
127 
BCT NETWORK .........................................................................................................
127A 
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .......................................................................................
4,273 
4,273 
128 
PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS .........................................................................................
129 
FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) .............................................
8,636 
5,213 
Accoustic hailing device contract delay .................................................................
[–3,423 ] 
130 
BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) .......................................................................
41,204 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–41,204 ] 
131 
CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION .............................................................................
10,700 
10,700 
132 
SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) ..............................
362 
362 
133 
TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................................
77,428 
77,428 
134 
TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ..................................................................
49,154 
45,454 
Excessive program support cost growth .................................................................
[–3,700 ] 
135 
HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST .....................
39,263 
39,263 
136 
GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ...............................
20,678 
20,678 
137 
ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ...............................................
30,297 
M160 incremental funding ......................................................................................
[–8,000 ] 
Transfer to OCO ......................................................................................................
[–22,297 ] 
138 
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) .......................
17,626 
17,626 
139 
REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS .......................................................................
14,672 
14,672 
140 
< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT .................................................................
7,352 
7,352 
141 
AERIAL DETECTION ...............................................................................................
142 
HEATERS AND ECU’S ............................................................................................
10,109 
10,109 
143 
LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES .........................................................
144 
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ....................................................................................
9,591 
9,591 
145 
LIGHTWEIGHT MAINTENANCE ENCLOSURE (LME) ....................................
146 
PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) ...................................
8,509 
8,509 
147 
GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM .................................................................................
184,072 
4,000 
Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 119 ...............................................
[–7,600 ] 
Program delay ..........................................................................................................
[–172,472 ] 
148 
MOUNTED SOLDIER SYSTEM ..............................................................................
43,419 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–43,400 ] 
149 
FORCE PROVIDER ...................................................................................................
150 
FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .............................................................................
26,860 
26,860 
151 
CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM .....................
68,392 
55,392 
Army offered program reduction ............................................................................
[–13,000 ] 
152 
MOBILE INTEGRATED REMAINS COLLECTION SYSTEM: ..........................
7,384 
7,384 
153 
FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ............................
54,190 
54,190 
154 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ...................................................................
12,482 
12,482 
155 
QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT ...........................................................
156 
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER ......................................
75,457 
75,457 
157 
WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS ......................................................................
158 
COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ..............................................................................
53,450 
53,450 
159 
MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS ...........................................
16,572 
16,572 
160 
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) ..............................................................
3,852 
3,852 
161 
GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ............................................................
2,201 
2,201 
162 
SKID STEER LOADER (SSL) FAMILY OF SYSTEM ........................................
8,584 
3,984 
Excessive unit cost and program support cost growth .........................................
[–4,600 ]