State funds, which contributed to the meeting of, or 
the failure to meet, the goals. 
‘‘(2) Whether the work programs of the State 
were effective in meeting the objectives and numer-
ical goals of the State plan. This part of the report 
shall include a discussion of data derived from the 
tracking of recipients, including— 
‘‘(A) the number of families that left the 
State program funded under this part; 
‘‘(B) the employment rate for those who 
left the program in each calendar quarter; 
‘‘(C) the wage rates of those who left the 
program, including the percentage of leavers 
who, in each calendar quarter, earned an 
amount equal to at least 50 percent of the aver-
age wage then paid in the State; and 
‘‘(D) the employment outcomes of those 
who left the program because of a durational 
limit on assistance, reported at 6 months, 12 
months, 24, months, and 36 months after leav-
ing the program. 
The Secretary shall provide States with technical as-
sistance in preparing this part of the report, includ-
ing by providing States with data from the National 
Directory of New Hires. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3573.IH
H3573
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(3) Whether the State has been effective in 
providing benefits and services under the program to 
persons with disabilities. This part of the report 
shall include a report on recipients of assistance 
under the State program funded under this part who 
participated in work activities (as defined in section 
407(d)) pursuant to a modified employability plan 
due to disability, including the following: 
‘‘(A) The aggregate number of recipients 
with modified employability plans due to a dis-
ability. 
‘‘(B) The percentage of all recipients with 
modified employability plans who substantially 
complied with activities set forth in the plans 
each month of the fiscal year. 
‘‘(C) Information regarding the most prev-
alent types of physical and mental impairments 
that provided the basis for the disability deter-
minations. 
‘‘(D) The percentage of cases with a modi-
fied employability plan in which the recipient 
had a disability, was caring for a child with a 
disability, or was caring for another family 
member with a disability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3573.IH
H3573
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
‘‘(E) A description of the most prevalent 
types of modification in work activities or hours 
of participation that were included in the modi-
fied employability plans. 
‘‘(F) A description of the qualifications of 
the staff who determined whether individuals 
had a disability, of the staff who determined 
that individuals needed modifications to their 
work requirements, and of the staff who devel-
oped the modified employability plans. 
‘‘(4) The effectiveness of the benefits and serv-
ices provided under the State program in reducing 
the number of children removed from their homes 
because of abuse and neglect. This part of the report 
shall include an analysis which includes the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(A) The number of families provided the 
benefits or services that were at risk of having 
their children removed from the home. 
‘‘(B) The number of families served by the 
program that had 1 or more children removed 
from the home because of abuse or neglect. 
‘‘(5) An analysis of the extent to which the ben-
efits and services under the State program were pro-
vided to noncustodial parents. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
22:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3573.IH
H3573
jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS