datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4109 
To allow seniors with Social Security and pension income to file their income 
tax returns on a new Form 1040SR without regard to the amount 
of interest or taxable income of the senior. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 1, 2004 
Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Ways and Means 
A BILL 
To allow seniors with Social Security and pension income 
to file their income tax returns on a new Form 1040SR 
without regard to the amount of interest or taxable in-
come of the senior. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simple Tax for Seniors 
Act’’. 
SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following:
(1) More than 35,000,000 individuals are pro-
hibited from using Form 1040EZ to file their in-
come tax returns simply because they are age 62 or 
older. 
(2) The Congress should aggressively seek to 
end age discrimination in Federal tax regulation. 
(3) The Internal Revenue Service reports that 
each year seniors file more than 11,000,000 tax re-
turns claiming only the standard deduction. Because 
some tax returns are joint returns, standard-deduc-
tion returns represent close to 15,000,000 seniors. 
Many, if not all, of these seniors would appreciate 
the option of a simple and less time-consuming Fed-
eral tax return. 
(4) The Internal Revenue Service reports that 
processing a Form 1040 costs the Government— 
and, therefore, taxpayers—50 percent more than 
processing a Form 1040EZ. 
SEC. 3. FORM 1040SR FOR CERTAIN SENIORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—An eligible senior (and, in the 
case of a joint return, such individual’s spouse) shall not 
be treated as ineligible to use the form referred to in sub-
section (b) to file the return of tax imposed under section 
1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for any taxable
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act 
on the basis of— 
(1) such individual receiving any social security 
benefit or any distribution from a retirement plan, 
(2) the amount of such taxpayer’s taxable inter-
est income, or 
(3) the amount of such taxpayer’s taxable in-
come. 
(b) FORM 1040SR.—The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall develop a form for purposes of carrying out sub-
section (a). Such form shall be similar to Form 1040EZ, 
known as ‘‘Form 1040SR’’, and a single page which is 
8 1⁄2 inches by 11 inches in size with clear and reasonable 
type. 
(c) ELIGIBLE SENIOR.—For purposes of this section, 
the term ‘‘eligible senior’’ means, with respect to any tax-
able year, any individual who has attained age 62 as of 
the close of such taxable year. 
Æ
IIB 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4109
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JUNE 3, 2004
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 
AN ACT 
To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new 
Form 1040S.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 4109 RFS 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simple Tax for Seniors 
Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. FORM 1040S FOR SENIORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 
the Secretary’s delegate) shall make available a form, to 
be known as ‘‘Form 1040S’’, for use by individuals to file 
the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 
practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that—
(1) the form shall be available to individuals 
who have attained age 65 as of the close of the tax-
able year, 
(2) the form may be used even if income for the 
taxable year includes—
(A) social security benefits (as defined in 
section 86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986), 
(B) distributions from qualified retirement 
plans (as defined in section 4974(c) of such 
Code), annuities or other such deferred pay-
ment arrangements, 
(C) interest and dividends, or 
(D) capital gains and losses taken into ac-
count in determining adjusted net capital gain 
(as defined in section 1(h)(3)), and
HR 4109 RFS 
(3) the form shall be available without regard 
to the amount of any item of taxable income or the 
total amount of taxable income for the taxable year. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The form required by sub-
section (a) shall be made available for taxable years begin-
ning after December 31, 2004.
Passed the House of Representatives June 2, 2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
out ornamentation or a fixed interior lining, which 
is designed for the encasement of human remains 
and which is made of fiberboard, pressed-wood, com-
position materials (with or without an outside cov-
ering), or similar materials. 
(2) ARRANGEMENT SERVICES FEE.—The term 
‘‘arrangement services fee’’ means a reasonable fee 
that— 
(A) is charged to cover professional and 
overhead costs, including staff time dedicated to 
conducting arrangement conferences, imple-
menting arrangement instructions, obtaining 
permits or other authorizations, preparing no-
tices for newspapers, coordinating with clergy 
and monument dealers, and similar activities; 
and 
(B) is— 
(i) calculated at an hourly rate; or 
(ii) a series of flat-rate fees for spe-
cific arrangements made by a funeral serv-
ice provider. 
(3) CASH ADVANCE ITEM.—The term ‘‘cash ad-
vance item’’ means any item of service or merchan-
dise described to a purchaser as a cash advance, ac-
commodation, cash disbursement, or similar term. A
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4110 
To facilitate homeownership in high-cost areas. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 1, 2004 
Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself and Mr. FRANK of Massachu-
setts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Financial Services 
A BILL 
To facilitate homeownership in high-cost areas. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Single Family 
Loan Limit Adjustment Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. FHA SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING MAXIMUM MORT-
GAGE LIMIT. 
Section 203(b)(2)(A) of the National Housing Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2)(A)) is amended— 
(1) in clause (i)—
(A) by striking ‘‘95 percent’’ and inserting 
‘‘100 percent’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(2) in clause (ii)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘87 percent of the dollar 
amount limitation determined under section 
305(a)(2) of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation Act for a residence of the applica-
ble size;’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘for Fiscal Year’’ and in-
serting a comma; 
(3) by transferring and inserting the text of 
clause (ii) (as so amended) into clause (i) after the 
semicolon at the end; 
(4) by striking clause (ii); 
(5) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) not to 
exceed,’’; 
(6) by striking ‘‘(A) not to exceed the lesser 
of—’’; and 
(7) by realigning subparagraph (A) (as so re-
designated by paragraph (5) of this subsection), so 
as to be indented 4 ems from the left margin. 
Æ
HR 4116 RDS 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, and the 35th anni-
versary, in 2008, of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 and the designation of the bald eagle as an 
‘‘endangered’’ species under such Act, Congress 
wishes to offer the opportunity for all persons to vol-
untarily participate in raising funds for future bald 
eagle recovery, monitoring, and preservation efforts 
and to contribute to a special American Eagle Fund 
endowment managed by the not-for-profit American 
Eagle Foundation of Tennessee in the United 
States, in cooperation with fund management ex-
perts. 
(15) It is appropriate for Congress to authorize 
coins— 
(A) celebrating the recovery and restora-
tion of the bald eagle, the living symbol of free-
dom in the United States, to America’s lands, 
waterways, and skies; 
(B) commemorating the removal of the 
bald eagle from the ‘‘endangered’’ and ‘‘threat-
ened’’ species lists under the Endangered Spe-
cies Act of 1973; and 
(C) commemorating the 35th anniversary 
of the enactment of the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973 and the designation of the bald
TITLE I—EXCLUSION OF NON-
NATIVE SPECIES FROM MI-
GRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT 
SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE. 
This title may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Bird Treaty 
Reform Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 102. EXCLUSION OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES FROM AP-
PLICATION 
OF 
CERTAIN 
PROHIBITIONS 
UNDER MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT. 
Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 
703) is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘That unless 
and except as permitted’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Unless and except as permitted’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION TO INTRODUCED 
SPECIES.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section applies only to 
migratory bird species that are native to the United 
States and whose occurrence in the United States is 
entirely the result of natural biological or ecological 
conditions. 
‘‘(2) TREATMENT
OF
INTRODUCED
SPECIES.— 
For purposes of paragraph (1)—
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4114 
To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exclude non-native migratory 
bird species from the application of that Act, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 1, 2004 
Mr. GILCHREST (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, and Mr. KIND) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exclude non- 
native migratory bird species from the application of 
that Act, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Bird Treaty 
Reform Act of 2004’’. 
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES FROM APPLI-
CATION OF CERTAIN PROHIBITIONS UNDER 
MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT. 
Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 
U.S.C. 703) is amended—
(1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘That un-
less and except as permitted’’ and inserting the fol-
lowing: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Unless and except as 
permitted’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION TO INTRODUCED 
SPECIES.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section applies only to 
migratory bird species that are native to the United 
States and whose occurrence in the United States is 
entirely the result of natural biological or ecological 
conditions. 
‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF INTRODUCED SPECIES.— 
For purposes of paragraph (1)— 
‘‘(A) a bird species shall not be treated as 
native to the United States if it occurs in the 
United States solely as a result of intentional or 
unintentional human-assisted introduction; and 
‘‘(B) a migratory bird species shall be 
treated as native to the United States if— 
‘‘(i) it was native to the United States 
and extant in 1918; 
‘‘(ii) it was extirpated after 1918 
throughout its range in the United States; 
and
‘‘(iii) after such extirpation, it was re-
introduced in the United States as a part 
of a program carried out by a Federal 
agency.’’. 
Æ
‘‘(2) Multiple or discriminatory taxes on elec-
tronic commerce.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section 1101 of 
the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is 
amended by striking subsection (d). 
(2) Section 1104(10) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act 
(47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ‘‘unless’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘1998’’. 
(3) Section 1104(2)(B)(i) of the Internet Tax Freedom 
Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ‘‘except 
with respect to a tax (on Internet access) that was generally 
imposed and actually enforced prior to October 1, 1998,’’. 
(c) CLARIFICATION.—The second sentence of section 
1104(5), and the second sentence of section 1101(e)(3)(D), 
of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) are 
each amended by inserting ‘‘, except to the extent such serv-
ices are used to provide Internet access’’ before the period.
Union Calendar No. 128
108TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 49
[Report No. 108–234] 
A BILL 
To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by 
the Internet Tax Freedom Act, and for other 
purposes. 
JULY 24, 2003
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed
122
modification of programs based on outcomes of 
the projects. 
(g) AMENDMENT TO UNITED STATES HOUSING ACT 
OF 1937.—Section 5A(d) of the United States Housing 
Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437c–1(d)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraph (18) as para-
graph (19); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (17) the fol-
lowing new paragraph: 
‘‘(18) PROGRAM
COORDINATION
DEMONSTRA-
TION PROJECTS.—In the case of an agency that ad-
ministers 
an 
activity 
referred 
to 
in 
section 
701(b)(2)(H) of the Personal Responsibility, Work, 
and Family Promotion Act of 2003 that, during 
such fiscal year, will be included in a demonstration 
project under section 701 of such Act, the informa-
tion that is required to be included in the application 
for the project pursuant to paragraphs (1) through 
(4) of section 701(b) of such Act.’’. 
SEC. 602. STATE FOOD ASSISTANCE BLOCK GRANT DEM-
ONSTRATION PROJECT. 
The Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
123
‘‘SEC. 28. STATE FOOD ASSISTANCE BLOCK GRANT DEM-
ONSTRATION PROJECT. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall estab-
lish a program to make grants to States in accordance 
with this section to provide—
‘‘(1) food assistance to needy individuals and 
families residing in the State; 
‘‘(2) funds to operate an employment and train-
ing program under subsection (g) for needy individ-
uals under the program; and 
‘‘(3) funds for administrative costs incurred in 
providing the assistance. 
‘‘(b) ELECTION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may elect to par-
ticipate in the program established under subsection 
(a). 
‘‘(2) ELECTION
REVOCABLE.—A State that 
elects to participate in the program established 
under subsection (a) may subsequently reverse the 
election of the State only once thereafter. Following 
the reversal, the State shall only be eligible to par-
ticipate in the food stamp program in accordance 
with the other sections of this Act and shall not re-
ceive a block grant under this section. 
‘‘(3) PROGRAM
EXCLUSIVE.—A State that is 
participating in the program established under sub-
124
section (a) shall not be subject to, or receive any 
benefit under, this Act except as provided in this 
section. 
‘‘(c) LEAD AGENCY.—
‘‘(1) DESIGNATION.—A State desiring to par-
ticipate in the program established under subsection 
(a) shall designate, in an application submitted to 
the Secretary under subsection (d)(1), an appro-
priate State agency that complies with paragraph 
(2) to act as the lead agency for the State. 
‘‘(2) DUTIES.—The lead agency shall—
‘‘(A) administer, either directly, through 
other State agencies, or through local agencies, 
the assistance received under this section by the 
State; 
‘‘(B) develop the State plan to be sub-
mitted to the Secretary under subsection (d)(1); 
and 
‘‘(C) coordinate the provision of food as-
sistance under this section with other Federal, 
State, and local programs. 
‘‘(d) APPLICATION AND PLAN.—
‘‘(1) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive 
assistance under this section, a State shall prepare 
and submit to the Secretary an application at such
108TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4115
AN ACT
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112),
to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in
all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA-
MARICOPA 
INDIAN 
RESERVATION 
CON-
TRACTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of Novem-
ber 2, 1966 (25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended—
(1) in the first sentence—
(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that
follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting
‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting
land’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’
and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such
leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such
Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall take effect as if included in the Indian
Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encourage-
ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–179).
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2004.
Attest:
Clerk.
H. R. 4115
One Hundred Eighth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four
An Act
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding arbitration
clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA
INDIAN RESERVATION CONTRACTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of November 2, 1966
(25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended—
(1) in the first sentence—
(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that follows through
‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting ‘‘Any contract, including a
lease, affecting land’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ and inserting
‘‘such contract’’; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such leases or
contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts’’ and inserting
‘‘Such contracts’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section
shall take effect as if included in the Indian Tribal Economic
Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000 (Public Law
106–179).
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
I 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4115 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 
arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 
within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 1, 2004 
Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Resources 
A BILL 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), 
to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in 
all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River 
Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA- 
MARICOPA 
INDIAN 
RESERVATION 
CON-
TRACTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of Novem-
ber 2, 1966 (25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence—
(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that 
follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting 
‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting 
land’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and 
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 
leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such 
Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect as if included in the Indian 
Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encourage-
ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–179). 
Æ
II 
Calendar No. 652 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4115 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
JULY 20, 2004 
Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 
AN ACT 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), 
to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in 
all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River 
Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA- 
MARICOPA 
INDIAN 
RESERVATION 
CON-
TRACTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of Novem-
ber 2, 1966 (25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that 
follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting
HR 4115 PCS 
‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting 
land’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and 
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 
leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such 
Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect as if included in the Indian 
Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encourage-
ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–179). 
Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2004. 
Attest: 
JEFF TRANDAHL, 
Clerk.
Calendar No. 652 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4115 
AN ACT 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 
1112), to allow binding arbitration clauses to be 
included in all contracts affecting the land within 
the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reserva-
tion. 
JULY 20, 2004 
Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
IB 
Union Calendar No. 309 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4115 
[Report No. 108–535] 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 
arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 
within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
APRIL 1, 2004 
Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Resources 
JUNE 9, 2004 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
and ordered to be printed 
A BILL 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), 
to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in 
all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River 
Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA- 
MARICOPA 
INDIAN 
RESERVATION 
CON-
TRACTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of Novem-
ber 2, 1966 (25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended— 
(1) in the first sentence— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that 
follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting 
‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting 
land’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ 
and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and 
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 
leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such 
Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect as if included in the Indian 
Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encourage-
ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–179).
Union Calendar No. 309 
108TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 4115 
[Report No. 108–535] 
A BILL 
To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 
1112), to allow binding arbitration clauses to be 
included in all contracts affecting the land within 
the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reserva-
tion. 
JUNE 9, 2004 
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union and ordered to be printed