H. R. 5116—55 
research and development spending, and other relevant 
information for regional innovation clusters; and 
‘‘(iii) supply chain product and service flows within 
and between regional innovation clusters. 
‘‘(2) 
RESEARCH
GRANTS.—The 
Secretary 
may 
award 
research grants on a competitive basis to support and further 
the goals of the program established under this subsection. 
‘‘(3) DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION.—Data and analysis 
compiled by the Secretary under the program established in 
this subsection shall be made available to other Federal agen-
cies, State and local governments, and nonprofit and for-profit 
entities. 
‘‘(4) REGIONAL
INNOVATION
GRANT
PROGRAM.—The Sec-
retary shall incorporate data and analysis relating to any grant 
under subsection (b) or (c) and any loan guarantee under sub-
section (d) into the program established under this subsection. 
‘‘(f) INTERAGENCY COORDINATION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—To the maximum extent practicable, the 
Secretary shall ensure that the activities carried out under 
this section are coordinated with, and do not duplicate the 
efforts of, other programs at the Department of Commerce 
or other Federal agencies. 
‘‘(2) COLLABORATION.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall explore and 
pursue collaboration with other Federal agencies, including 
through multiagency funding opportunities, on regional 
innovation strategies. 
‘‘(B) SMALL BUSINESSES.—The Secretary shall ensure 
that such collaboration with Federal agencies prioritizes 
the needs and challenges of small businesses. 
‘‘(g) EVALUATION.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date 
of enactment of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act 
of 2010, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with an 
independent entity, such as the National Academy of Sciences, 
to conduct an evaluation of the program established under 
subsection (a). 
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The evaluation shall include— 
‘‘(A) whether the program is achieving its goals; 
‘‘(B) any recommendations for how the program may 
be improved; and 
‘‘(C) a recommendation as to whether the program 
should be continued or terminated. 
‘‘(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) REGIONAL INNOVATION CLUSTER.—The term ‘regional 
innovation cluster’ means a geographically bounded network 
of similar, synergistic, or complementary entities that— 
‘‘(A) are engaged in or with a particular industry sector; 
‘‘(B) have active channels for business transactions 
and communication; 
‘‘(C) share specialized infrastructure, labor markets, 
and services; and 
‘‘(D) leverage the region’s unique competitive strengths 
to stimulate innovation and create jobs. 
‘‘(2) SCIENCE PARK.—The term ‘Science park’ means a prop-
erty-based venture, which has—
H. R. 5116—56 
‘‘(A) master-planned property and buildings designed 
primarily for private-public research and development 
activities, high technology and science-based companies, 
and research and development support services; 
‘‘(B) a contractual or operational relationship with one 
or more science- or research-related institution of higher 
education or governmental or non-profit research labora-
tories; 
‘‘(C) a primary mission to promote research and 
development through industry partnerships, assisting in 
the growth of new ventures and promoting innovation- 
driven economic development; 
‘‘(D) a role in facilitating the transfer of technology 
and business skills between researchers and industry 
teams; and 
‘‘(E) a role in promoting technology-led economic 
development for the community or region in which the 
science park is located.A science park may be owned by 
a governmental or not-for-profit entity, but it may enter 
into partnerships or joint ventures with for-profit entities 
for development or management of specific components 
of the park. 
‘‘(3) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means one of the several 
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Common-
wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or any other territory 
or possession of the United States. 
‘‘(i) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Except as provided 
in subsection (d)(8), there are authorized to be appropriated 
$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2013 to carry 
out this section (other than for loan guarantees under subsection 
(d)).’’. 
SEC. 604. STUDY ON ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS AND INNOVATIVE 
CAPACITY OF UNITED STATES AND DEVELOPMENT OF 
NATIONAL ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY. 
(a) STUDY.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall 
complete a comprehensive study of the economic competitive-
ness and innovative capacity of the United States. 
(2) MATTERS COVERED.—The study required by paragraph 
(1) shall include the following: 
(A) An analysis of the United States economy and 
innovation infrastructure. 
(B) An assessment of the following: 
(i) 
The 
current 
competitive 
and 
innovation 
performance of the United States economy relative to 
other countries that compete economically with the 
United States. 
(ii) Economic competitiveness and domestic innova-
tion in the current business climate, including tax and 
Federal regulatory policy. 
(iii) The business climate of the United States 
and those of other countries that compete economically 
with the United States.
H. R. 5116—57 
(iv) Regional issues that influence the economic 
competitiveness and innovation capacity of the United 
States, including— 
(I) the roles of State and local governments 
and institutions of higher education; and 
(II) regional factors that contribute positively 
to innovation. 
(v) The effectiveness of the Federal Government 
in supporting and promoting economic competitiveness 
and innovation, including any duplicative efforts of, 
or gaps in coverage between, Federal agencies and 
departments. 
(vi) Barriers to competitiveness in newly emerging 
business or technology sectors, factors influencing 
underperforming economic sectors, unique issues facing 
small and medium enterprises, and barriers to the 
development and evolution of start-ups, firms, and 
industries. 
(vii) The effects of domestic and international trade 
policy on the competitiveness of the United States and 
the United States economy. 
(viii) United States export promotion and export 
finance programs relative to export promotion and 
export finance programs of other countries that com-
pete economically with the United States, including 
Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, and 
the United Kingdom, with noting of export promotion 
and export finance programs carried out by such coun-
tries that are not analogous to any programs carried 
out by the United States. 
(ix) The effectiveness of current policies and pro-
grams affecting exports, including an assessment of 
Federal trade restrictions and State and Federal export 
promotion activities. 
(x) The effectiveness of the Federal Government 
and Federally funded research and development cen-
ters in supporting and promoting technology commer-
cialization and technology transfer. 
(xi) Domestic and international intellectual prop-
erty policies and practices. 
(xii) Manufacturing capacity, logistics, and supply 
chain dynamics of major export sectors, including 
access to a skilled workforce, physical infrastructure, 
and broadband network infrastructure. 
(xiii) Federal and State policies relating to science, 
technology, and education and other relevant Federal 
and State policies designed to promote commercial 
innovation, including immigration policies. 
(C) Development of recommendations on the following: 
(i) How the United States should invest in human 
capital. 
(ii) How the United States should facilitate 
entrepreneurship and innovation. 
(iii) How best to develop opportunities for locally 
and regionally driven innovation by providing Federal 
support.
H. R. 5116—58 
(iv) How best to strengthen the economic infra-
structure and industrial base of the United States. 
(v) How to improve the international competitive-
ness of the United States. 
(3) CONSULTATION.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The study required by paragraph 
(1) shall be conducted in consultation with the National 
Economic Council of the Office of Policy Development, such 
Federal agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate, 
and the Innovation Advisory Board established under 
subparagraph (B). The Secretary shall also establish a 
process for obtaining comments from the public. 
(B) INNOVATION ADVISORY BOARD.— 
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish an 
Innovation Advisory Board for purposes of obtaining 
advice with respect to the conduct of the study required 
by paragraph (1). 
(ii) COMPOSITION.—The Advisory Board established 
under clause (i) shall be comprised of 15 members, 
appointed by the Secretary— 
(I) who shall represent all major industry sec-
tors; 
(II) a majority of whom should be from private 
industry, including large and small firms, rep-
resenting advanced technology sectors and more 
traditional sectors that use technology; and 
(III) who may include economic or innovation 
policy experts, State and local government officials 
active in technology-based economic development, 
and representatives from higher education. 
(iii) EXEMPTION FROM FACA.—The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the 
advisory board established under clause (i). 
(b) STRATEGY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the completion 
of the study required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
develop, based on the study required by subsection (a)(1), a 
national 10-year strategy to strengthen the innovative and 
competitive capacity of the Federal Government, State and 
local governments, United States institutions of higher edu-
cation, and the private sector of the United States. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by paragraph (1) 
shall include the following: 
(A) Actions to be taken by individual Federal agencies 
and departments to improve competitiveness. 
(B) Proposed legislative actions for consideration by 
Congress. 
(C) Annual goals and milestones for the 10-year period 
of the strategy. 
(D) A plan for monitoring the progress of the Federal 
Government with respect to improving conditions for 
innovation and the competitiveness of the United States. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Upon the completion of the strategy 
required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Commerce shall 
submit to Congress and the President a report on the study
H. R. 5116—59 
conducted under subsection (a) and the strategy developed 
under subsection (b). 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
include the following: 
(A) The findings of the Secretary with respect to the 
study conducted under subsection (a). 
(B) The strategy required by subsection (b). 
SEC. 605. PROMOTING USE OF HIGH-END COMPUTING SIMULATION 
AND MODELING BY SMALL- AND MEDIUM-SIZED MANU-
FACTURERS. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 
(1) the utilization of high-end computing simulation and 
modeling by large-scale government contractors and Federal 
research entities has resulted in substantial improvements in 
the development of advanced manufacturing technologies; and 
(2) such simulation and modeling would also benefit small- 
and medium-sized manufacturers in the United States if such 
manufacturers were to deploy such simulation and modeling 
throughout their manufacturing chains. 
(b) POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States to take all 
effective measures practicable to ensure that Federal programs 
and policies encourage and contribute to the use of high-end com-
puting simulation and modeling in the United States manufacturing 
sector. 
(c) STUDY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Director 
of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall carry 
out, through an interagency consulting process, a study of the 
barriers to the use of high-end computing simulation and mod-
eling by small- and medium-sized manufacturers in the United 
States. 
(2) FACTORS.—In carrying out the study required by para-
graph (1), the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with 
the Secretary of Energy and the Director of the Office of Science 
and Technology Policy, shall consider the following: 
(A) The access of small- and medium-sized manufactur-
ers in the United States to high-performance computing 
facilities and resources. 
(B) The availability of software and other applications 
tailored to meet the needs of such manufacturers. 
(C) Whether such manufacturers employ or have access 
to individuals with appropriate expertise for the use of 
such facilities and resources. 
(D) Whether such manufacturers have access to 
training to develop such expertise. 
(E) The availability of tools and other methods to such 
manufacturers to understand and manage the costs and 
risks associated with transitioning to the use of such facili-
ties and resources. 
(3) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the commence-
ment of the study required by paragraph (1), the Secretary 
of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy 
and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, 
submit to Congress a report on such study. Such report shall
H. R. 5116—60 
include such recommendations for such legislative or adminis-
trative action as the Secretary of Commerce considers appro-
priate in light of the study to increase the utilization of high- 
end computing simulation and modeling by small- and medium- 
sized manufacturers in the United States. 
(d) AUTHORIZATION OF DEMONSTRATION AND PILOT PROGRAMS.— 
As part of the study required by subsection (c)(1), the Secretary 
of Commerce, the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of the 
Office of Science and Technology Policy may carry out such dem-
onstration or pilot programs as either Secretary or the Director 
considers appropriate to gather experiential data to evaluate the 
feasibility and advisability of a specific program or policy initiative 
to reduce barriers to the utilization of high-end computer modeling 
and simulation by small- and medium-sized manufacturers in the 
United States. 
TITLE VII—NIST GREEN JOBS 
SEC. 701. SHORT TITLE. 
This title may be cited as the ‘‘NIST Grants for Energy Effi-
ciency, New Job Opportunities, and Business Solutions Act of 2010’’ 
or the ‘‘NIST GREEN JOBS Act of 2010’’. 
SEC. 702. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) Over its 20-year existence, the Hollings Manufacturing 
Extension Partnership has proven its value to manufacturers 
as demonstrated by the resulting impact on jobs and the econo-
mies of all 50 States and the Nation as a whole. 
(2) The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership has 
helped thousands of companies reinvest in themselves through 
process improvement and business growth initiatives leading 
to more sales, new markets, and the adoption of technology 
to deliver new products and services. 
(3) Manufacturing is an increasingly important part of 
the construction sector as the industry moves to the use of 
more components and factory built sub-assemblies. 
(4) Construction practices must become more efficient and 
precise if the United States is to construct and renovate its 
building stock to reduce related carbon emissions to levels 
that are consistent with combating global warming. 
(5) Many companies involved in construction are small, 
without access to innovative manufacturing techniques, and 
could benefit from the type of training and business analysis 
activities that the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partner-
ship routinely provides to the Nation’s manufacturers and their 
supply chains. 
(6) Broadening the competitiveness grant program under 
section 25(f) of the National Institute of Standards and Tech-
nology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(f)) could help develop and diffuse 
knowledge necessary to capture a large portion of the estimated 
$100 billion or more in energy savings if buildings in the 
United States met the level and quality of energy efficiency 
now found in buildings in certain other countries.
H. R. 5116—61 
(7) It is therefore in the national interest to expand the 
capabilities of the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partner-
ship to be supportive of the construction and green energy 
industries. 
SEC. 703. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY 
COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 25(f)(3) of the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(f)(3)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘to develop’’ in the first sentence and 
inserting ‘‘to add capabilities to the MEP program, including 
the development of’’; and 
(2) by striking the last sentence and inserting ‘‘Centers 
may be reimbursed for costs incurred under the program. These 
themes— 
‘‘(A) shall be related to projects designed to increase 
the viability both of traditional manufacturing sectors and 
other sectors, such as construction, that increasingly rely 
on manufacturing through the use of manufactured compo-
nents and manufacturing techniques, including supply 
chain integration and quality management; 
‘‘(B) shall be related to projects related to the transfer 
of technology based on the technological needs of manufac-
turers and available technologies from institutions of higher 
education, laboratories, and other technology producing 
entities; and 
‘‘(C) may extend beyond these traditional areas to 
include projects related to construction industry moderniza-
tion.’’. 
(b) SELECTION.—Section 25(f)(5) of the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(f)(5)) is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘(5) SELECTION.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Awards under this section shall be 
peer reviewed and competitively awarded. The Director 
shall endeavor to select at least one proposal in each of 
the 9 statistical divisions of the United States (as des-
ignated by the Bureau of the Census). The Director shall 
select proposals to receive awards that will— 
‘‘(i) create jobs or train newly hired employees; 
‘‘(ii) promote technology transfer and commer-
cialization of environmentally focused materials, prod-
ucts, and processes; 
‘‘(iii) increase energy efficiency; and 
‘‘(iv) improve the competitiveness of industries in 
the region in which the Center or Centers are located. 
‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL
SELECTION
CRITERIA.—The Director 
may select proposals to receive awards that will— 
‘‘(i) encourage greater cooperation and foster part-
nerships in the region with similar Federal, State, 
and locally funded programs to encourage energy effi-
ciency and building technology; and 
‘‘(ii) collect data and analyze the increasing connection 
between manufactured products and manufacturing tech-
niques, the future of construction practices, and the 
emerging application of products from the green energy 
industries.’’.
H. R. 5116—62 
(c) OTHER
MODIFICATIONS.—Section 25(f) of the National 
Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(f)) is 
amended— 
(1) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(7) DURATION.—Awards under this section shall last no 
longer than 3 years. 
‘‘(8) ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS.—In addition to manufacturing 
firms eligible to participate in the Centers program, awards 
under this subsection may be used by the Centers to assist 
small- or medium-sized construction firms. Centers may be 
reimbursed under the program for working with such eligible 
participants. 
‘‘(9) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.—In addition to 
any amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated to carry 
out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated to 
the Secretary of Commerce $7,000,000 for each of the fiscal 
years 2011 through 2013 to carry out this subsection.’’. 
TITLE VIII—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
SEC. 801. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE REVIEW. 
Not later than May 31, 2013, the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall submit a report to the Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Rep-
resentatives Committee on Science and Technology that evaluates 
the status of the programs authorized in this Act, including the 
extent to which such programs have been funded, implemented, 
and are contributing to achieving the goals of the Act. 
SEC. 802. SALARY RESTRICTIONS. 
(a) OBSCENE MATTER
ON FEDERAL PROPERTY.—None of the 
funds authorized under this Act may be used to pay the salary 
of any individual who is convicted of violating section 1460 of 
title 18, United States Code. 
(b) USE OF FEDERAL COMPUTERS FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OR 
EXPLOITATION OF MINORS.—None of the funds authorized under 
this Act may be used to pay the salary of any individual who 
is convicted of a violation of section 2252 of title 18, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 803. ADDITIONAL RESEARCH AUTHORITIES OF THE FCC. 
Title I of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘SEC. 12. ADDITIONAL RESEARCH AUTHORITIES OF THE FCC. 
‘‘In order to carry out the purposes of this Act, the Commission 
may— 
‘‘(1) undertake research and development work in connec-
tion with any matter in relation to which the Commission 
has jurisdiction; and 
‘‘(2) promote the carrying out of such research and develop-
ment by others, or otherwise to arrange for such research 
and development to be carried out by others.’’.
H. R. 5116—63 
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
SEC. 901. SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 
PROGRAMS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 3171, 3175, and 3191 of the Depart-
ment of Energy Science Education Enhancement Act (42 U.S.C. 
7381h, 7381j, 7381p) are repealed. 
(b) 
AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS
FOR
SUMMER 
INSTITUTES.—Section 3185(f) of the Department of Energy Science 
Education Enhancement Act (42 U.S.C. 7381n(f)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 
2013.’’. 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) Subpart B of the Department of Energy Science Edu-
cation Enhancement Act (42 U.S.C. 7381g et seq.) is amended 
by striking chapters 1, 2, and 5 (42 U.S.C. 7381h, 7381j, 7381p). 
(2) Section 3195 of the Department of Energy Science Edu-
cation Enhancement Act (42 U.S.C. 7381r) is amended by 
striking ‘‘chapters 1, 3, and 4’’ each place it appears and 
inserting ‘‘chapters 3 and 4’’. 
SEC. 902. ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRAMS. 
(a) NUCLEAR SCIENCE TALENT PROGRAM.—Section 5004(f) of 
the America COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16532(f)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(D) $9,800,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(E) $10,100,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(F) $10,400,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(D) $8,240,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(E) $8,500,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(F) $8,750,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’. 
(b) HYDROCARBON SYSTEMS SCIENCE TALENT PROGRAM.—Sec-
tion 5005 of the America COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16533) is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(J) hydrocarbon spill response and remediation.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (f)(1)— 
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’;
H. R. 5116—64 
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting a semicolon; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(D) $9,800,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(E) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(F) $10,400,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’. 
(c) EARLY CAREER AWARDS.—Section 5006(h) of the America 
COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16534(h)) is amended by striking ‘‘2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘2013’’. 
(d) PROTECTING AMERICA’S COMPETITIVE EDGE (PACE) GRAD-
UATE FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 5009(f) of the America COM-
PETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16536(f)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) $20,600,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(5) $21,200,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(6) $21,900,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’. 
(e) DISTINGUISHED SCIENTIST PROGRAM.—Section 5011(j) of the 
America COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16537(j)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(4) $31,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(5) $32,000,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(6) $33,000,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’. 
SEC. 903. BASIC RESEARCH. 
Section 971(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16311(b)) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end 
and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(5) $5,247,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; 
‘‘(6) $5,614,000,000 for fiscal year 2012; and 
‘‘(7) $6,007,000,000 for fiscal year 2013.’’. 
SEC. 904. ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY. 
Section 5012 of the America COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 16538) 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘subsection (m)(1)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘subsection (n)(1)’’; 
(2) in subsection (c)(2)(A), by inserting ‘‘and applied’’ after 
‘‘advances in fundamental’’; 
(3) in subsection (e)— 
(A) in paragraph (3)— 
(i) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
following: 
‘‘(C) research and development of advanced manufac-
turing process and technologies for the domestic manufac-
turing of novel energy technologies; and’’; and 
(ii) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 
the semicolon at the end; 
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and