H. R. 3—359
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
314. 
NY 
Roadway, Streetscape, Pedestrian, and Parking 
Improvements to the Buffalo Niagara Medical 
Campus in Buffalo ..................................................
$6,000,000
315. 
OH 
Reconstruction of Cleveland Inner Belt and re-
placement of the Central Viaduct Bridge. Cleve-
land, OH ..................................................................
$85,000,000
316. 
OH 
SR 3 intersection/interchange improvements and 
signalization, Franklin County, OH (PID 76279) 
$2,500,000
317. 
OH 
SR 81 widening, turn lane addition, and safety im-
provements, Allen County, OH (PID 75928) ........
$1,100,000
318. 
OH 
U.S. 422 turn lane addition and traffic flow im-
provements at SR 88/SR 528, Geauga County 
OH (PID 78343) ......................................................
$600,000
319. 
OH 
SR 39 add 2-way left turn lane, signalization, and 
safety improvements, Tuscarawas County OH 
(PID 19598) .............................................................
$1,600,000
320. 
OH 
U.S. 36 signal relocation and related safety im-
provements, Delaware County, OH (PID 76276)
$2,000,000
321. 
OH 
SR 39 2-way turn lane addition, signalization, and 
safety improvements, Holmes County, OH (PID 
23913) ......................................................................
$600,000
322. 
OH 
Evans Avenue/CSX RR Grade Separation Improve-
ments, Akron, OH ..................................................
$1,600,000
323. 
OK 
State of Oklahoma I–40 Crosstown Realignment in 
Oklahoma City ........................................................
$110,000,000
324. 
OK 
The University of Oklahoma to conduct research in 
global tracking methods for intermodal contain-
erized freight ...........................................................
$7,000,000
325. 
OK 
State of Oklahoma for control of outdoor adver-
tising ........................................................................
$1,000,000
326. 
OK 
Reconstruction of SH 20 in Owasso, Oklahoma ......
$2,000,000
327. 
OK 
Widen 
Hwy 
between 
Ponca 
City 
and 
Bartletsville .............................................................
$10,800,000
328. 
OK 
Trails in Tulsa, Mingo Creek, NCOG—Complete 
and extend Mingo trail from 41st to 81st St., 
from 11th St. to Mohawk Park ..............................
$2,000,000
329. 
OK 
Signalization, Complete update of traffic signals 
with LED illumination technology ........................
$2,200,000
330. 
OR 
To add a southbound lane to a section of I–5 
through Portland, OR between Delta Park and 
Lombard, Portland, Oregon ...................................
$2,000,000
331. 
OR 
Sunrise Corridor, Clackamas County, Oregon ........
$1,000,000
H. R. 3—360
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
332. 
OR 
Reroute U.S. 97 at Redmond, Oregon and improve-
ments to intersection of U.S. 97 and Oregon 126
$1,400,000
333. 
OR 
Construct Barber Street extension, Wilsonville, Or-
egon ..........................................................................
$600,000
334. 
OR 
Construct highway and pedestrian access to Mac-
adam Ave. and street improvements as part of 
South waterfront development, Portland, Oregon 
$1,800,000
335. 
OR 
Sellwood Bridge, Multnomah County, Oregon ........
$2,000,000
336. 
OR 
Highway 22-Cascade Highway interchange im-
provements, Marion County, Oregon ....................
$1,600,000
337. 
OR 
I–5 Trade Corridor, Portland, Oregon to Van-
couver, Washington Segment ................................
$2,000,000
338. 
OR 
Highway 101 Improvements, Oregon .......................
$500,000
339. 
OR 
I–205 Widening, Clackamas County, Oregon ..........
$1,400,000
340. 
OR 
Phase 1 I–205/Highway 213 Interchange Improve-
ments, Oregon .........................................................
$1,500,000
341. 
OR 
Kuebler Boulevard Improvements, Salem, Oregon
$500,000
342. 
OR 
To construct sidewalks and improve storm drain-
age and gutters for the City’s Safe Walk Plan, 
Medford, Oregon .....................................................
$2,000,000
343. 
OR 
Highway 140 Transportation Improvements, Lake 
County, Oregon .......................................................
$1,700,000
344. 
PA 
Warrendale-Bayne Road improvements from I–79 
to SR 19, in Allegheny County ..............................
$2,800,000
345. 
PA 
For design, engineering, ROW acquisition, and 
construction of the third phase of the Marshalls 
Creek Bypass Project in Monroe County, Penn-
sylvania ...................................................................
$1,000,000
346. 
PA 
Construction 
of 
Central 
Susquehanna 
Valley 
Thruway ..................................................................
$600,000
347. 
PA 
Improvements to SR 130 and the College Avenue 
Underpass, Greensburg, PA ..................................
$500,000
348. 
PA 
Mifflin County Industrial Park Access Road ...........
$500,000
349. 
PA 
Improvements to Section 114 of State Route 150, 
Centre County, PA .................................................
$2,500,000
350. 
PA 
Upgrade to SR 228, Cranberry Township, PA .........
$1,500,000
351. 
PA 
Purchase of right-of-way, utilities and construction 
for Northern Access to Altoona from Interstate 
99, Blair County, PA ..............................................
$600,000
352. 
PA 
Reconfiguration of the Rochester Riverfront ramp
$500,000
H. R. 3—361
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
353. 
PA 
Construct the Alle-Kiski Bridge and Connector ......
$1,500,000
354. 
PA 
Construct an intermodal center at the Philadel-
phia Zoo ...................................................................
$1,000,000
355. 
PA 
For interpretive signage and trails in Pittsburgh 
urban park land ......................................................
$2,000,000
356. 
PA 
Construct an intermodal facility in Derry Town-
ship ..........................................................................
$1,000,000
357. 
PA 
Construction of the Schuylkill Gateway Project ......
$700,000
358. 
PA 
Da Vinci Center hydrogen fuel-celled transit vehi-
cles ...........................................................................
$200,000
359. 
PA 
Construct a road along the North Delaware River-
front 
Corridor 
from 
Buckius 
Street 
to 
Poquessing Creek ...................................................
$1,000,000
360. 
PA 
Widen I–81 from four to six lanes in the Wilkes-
Barre/Scranton corridor .........................................
$1,000,000
361. 
PA 
Improvements to the Pleasant Valley and Sandy 
Hill Roads intersection with SR 130 in Penn 
Township .................................................................
$300,000
362. 
PA 
Improvements to access roads at the Please Touch 
Museum ...................................................................
$300,000
363. 
PA 
Construct the North Delaware River East Coast 
Greenway Trail .......................................................
$500,000
364. 
RI 
To enhance the infrastructure surrounding and for 
transportation improvements relative to the 
intermodal station at Warwick ..............................
$20,000,000
365. 
RI 
Improvements to Warren Bridge (Warren) ..............
$11,000,000
366. 
RI 
Open space acquisition to mitigate growth associ-
ated with SR 4 and Interstate 95, by non-profit 
land conservation agencies through acquisition 
of fee or easement, with a match requirement of 
50% of the total purchase price .............................
$2,000,000
367. 
RI 
Ten Mile River Greenway (Pawtucket, E. Provi-
dence) .......................................................................
$3,000,000
368. 
RI 
Washington Secondary Bicycle Facility/Coventry 
Greenway/Trestle Trail (Coventry) .......................
$4,000,000
369. 
RI 
South County Bike Path (South Kingstown, Narra-
gansett) ....................................................................
$2,000,000
370. 
RI 
New Interchange constructed from I–195 to Taun-
ton and Warren Avenue in East Providence ........
$1,500,000
H. R. 3—362
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
371. 
RI 
Jamestown Bridge Demolition—Bicycle Access/
Trestle 
Span 
Demolition/Fishing 
Pier 
(N. 
Kingstown) ..............................................................
$11,500,000
372. 
RI 
Sakonnet River Bridge Replacement ........................
$15,000,000
373. 
RI 
Rt. 146 Safety Improvements in North Smithfield
$5,000,000
374. 
SD 
Construction of 4-lane highway on U.S. 79 between 
Maverick Junction, and the Nebraska border ......
$19,000,000
375. 
SD 
Rosebud community streets reconstruction and 
paving ......................................................................
$6,000,000
376. 
SD 
Aberdeen bike trail extension ...................................
$1,000,000
377. 
SD 
Whether or not otherwise eligible in title 23, con-
struct Phase II and III of Phillips to the Falls 
Project. Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, with respect to costs for Phase II and III of 
this project paid for from this $40 million, the 
Federal share of project costs shall be 100 per-
cent ..........................................................................
$40,000,000
378. 
SD 
Rapid City Greenway Pedestrian and bike path ex-
pansion ....................................................................
$2,000,000
379. 
SD 
Brookings bike path ...................................................
$100,000
380. 
SD 
Sioux Falls Bike Path—Dunham Park, Skunk 
Creek, 12th St., and I–29 to Sertoma Park ..........
$1,170,000
381. 
SD 
For bike paths and pedestrian walkways within 
Yankton, Pierre, Huron, Watertown, and Madi-
son. Allocation for such paths will be determined 
by the State .............................................................
$2,500,000
382. 
SD 
Directed to SD DOT for projects it determines to 
be of high priority ...................................................
$3,230,000
383. 
TN 
North Second Street Corridor Upgrade, Memphis ..
$2,000,000
384. 
TN 
Upgrade roads for Slack Water Port facility and 
industrial park, Lake County, TN ........................
$2,000,000
385. 
TN 
Plan and construct Rutherford County visitor’s 
center/transportation information hub, Ruther-
ford County, Tennessee ..........................................
$1,000,000
386. 
TN 
Warren County Mountain View Industrial Park ac-
cess road, Warren County, TN ..............................
$1,000,000
387. 
TN 
Construction of an Interchange on Highway 64 
(APD 40) adjacent to I–75 Exit 20 in the City of 
Cleveland, TN for increased safety .......................
$2,000,000
388. 
TN 
Sullivan, Washington Counties, Tennessee SR 75 
widening ..................................................................
$1,000,000
H. R. 3—363
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
389. 
TN 
Sevier County, TN SR 66 widening ..........................
$500,000
390. 
TN 
Reconstruct U.S. 79 between Milan and McKenzie 
$5,000,000
391. 
TN 
Construct Transportation and Heritage museum, 
Townsend ................................................................
$500,000
392. 
UT 
Widen Highway 92 from Lehi to Highland ..............
$3,000,000
393. 
UT 
Widen Redwood Road from Bangerter Highway in 
Salt Lake County through Saratoga Springs in 
Utah County ...........................................................
$2,000,000
394. 
UT 
Construction of 200 North Street highway-rail 
graded crossing separation, Kaysville, Utah ........
$2,000,000
395. 
UT 
Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Access Road Im-
provements, Box Elder County, Utah ...................
$500,000
396. 
UT 
State Street Reconstruction Project—10600 South 
to 9400 South, Sandy, Utah ..................................
$2,500,000
397. 
UT 
Geneva Rd./Provo Center Street, Orem 1600 North 
to I–15 Fwy, Provo-widen from 2 to 4 lanes, 
Provo ........................................................................
$6,000,000
398. 
UT 
Provo, Utah Westside Connector from I–15 to 
Provo Municipal Airport, Provo .............................
$4,000,000
399. 
UT 
Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Access Road Im-
provements, Box Elder County ..............................
$3,000,000
400. 
UT 
Widen Highway 92 from Lehi to Alpine/Highland ..
$5,000,000
401. 
UT 
Construction of 200 North Street highway-rail 
graded crossing separation, Kaysville ..................
$7,000,000
402. 
UT 
Expand Redhills Parkway from 2 to 5 lanes and 
improve alignment within rights-of-way in St. 
George ......................................................................
$8,000,000
403. 
UT 
Construction and Rehabilitation of 13th East in 
Sandy City ...............................................................
$7,000,000
404. 
VA 
Hampton Roads Third Crossing-Segment 1 .............
$37,000,000
405. 
VA 
Manage Freight movement and safety improve-
ments to I–81 ..........................................................
$38,000,000
406. 
VA 
Construct Old Mill Road extension ..........................
$3,000,000
407. 
VA 
Widen Route 262 in Augusta County .......................
$3,000,000
408. 
VA 
Construct Meadowcreek Parkway Interchange, 
Charlottesville .........................................................
$2,000,000
409. 
VA 
Widening I–95 between Rt. 123 and Fairfax Coun-
ty Parkway ..............................................................
$2,000,000
410. 
VT 
Improvements to Vermont Small Bridges ................
$30,000,000
H. R. 3—364
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
411. 
VT 
Improvements to Vermont interstates .....................
$10,000,000
412. 
VT 
Vermont Institute of Natural Science turning lane 
on U.S. Rt. 4 in Woodstock ....................................
$300,000
413. 
VT 
Western Corridor Rail Improvements, ABRB&E, 
Vermont ...................................................................
$30,000,000
414. 
VT 
Design and Construction of the Bennington Wel-
come Center ............................................................
$6,500,000
415. 
VT 
Improvements to the E. Alburg Railroad Trestle 
Swing Span .............................................................
$5,000,000
416. 
VT 
Rehabilitation of Hartford Northbound and South-
bound rest areas .....................................................
$6,500,000
417. 
VT 
Improvements to the Island Line at South Street 
in South Hero .........................................................
$2,000,000
418. 
VT 
Property acquisition and improvements for public 
access and viewshed protection for the Cedar 
Creek Vermont monument at the Cedar Creek 
and Belle Grove National Historical Park in Vir-
ginia .........................................................................
$2,000,000
419. 
VT 
Design and construction of the South Burlington 
City Center project .................................................
$5,000,000
420. 
VT 
Rehabilitation of statewide covered bridges ............
$6,200,000
421. 
VT 
Improvements to the Green Mountain Rail Line 
between Rutland and Bellows Falls ......................
$2,500,000
422. 
VT 
Streetscape and road improvements in the Village 
of Enosburg Falls ....................................................
$1,000,000
423. 
VT 
Signalization and storm drainage improvements to 
Main Street in Brattleboro ....................................
$3,000,000
424. 
VT 
Streetscape, trail and road improvements in 
Lamoille, Caledonia, Grand Isle and Chittenden 
Counties ..................................................................
$4,000,000
425. 
VT 
Vermont 
Statewide 
Transportation 
and 
Stormwater Projects ...............................................
$6,000,000
426. 
WV 
Improvements to U.S. Rt.–35 in Putnam County ...
$25,000,000
427. 
WV 
Raleigh Street Extension Project in Martinsburg ...
$10,000,000
428. 
VA 
I–64/City Line Road Interchange in Virginia Beach 
$5,000,000
429. 
AS 
Shoreline protection and drainage mitigation for 
Nuuuli village roads ...............................................
$1,000,000
430. 
AS 
Village road improvements for Ta’u, Ofu, and 
Olosega-Sili counties in Manu’a district ...............
$1,400,000
H. R. 3—365
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
431. 
AS 
Shoreline protection and drainage mitigation for 
Aua village roads ....................................................
$1,000,000
432. 
AS 
Drainage mitigation in Malaeloa-Leone village 
roads ........................................................................
$1,400,000
433. 
AS 
To upgrade, repair and continue construction of 
Ta’u harbor/ferry terminal facility on Manu’a is-
land ..........................................................................
$1,600,000
434. 
AS 
Village road improvements for Launiusaelua and 
Ituau counties in the Central district ...................
$3,000,000
435. 
AS 
Village road improvements for Tualauta, Tualatai, 
Aitulagi, Fofo, and Alataua counties in the West-
ern district ..............................................................
$3,000,000
436. 
AS 
Village road improvements for Sua and Vaifanua 
counties in the Eastern district .............................
$2,600,000
437. 
AS 
Drainage mitigation for Pago Pago village roads ....
$1,000,000
438. 
GU 
Reconstruct Haga˚tn˜a River Bridges, Municipality 
of Haga˚tn˜a ...............................................................
$6,600,000
439. 
GU 
Piti, GU Construct Cabras Island Intermodal Fa-
cility .........................................................................
$6,000,000
440. 
GU 
Guam Mass Transit Authority Acquisition of tran-
sit vehicles for disabled persons ............................
$400,000
441. 
GU 
Construct Route 3A Extension, Municipality of 
Yigo ..........................................................................
$3,000,000
442. 
MP 
Planning design and construction of East Coast 
Highway/ Route 36, Saipan ...................................
$12,000,000
443. 
PR 
Construction of 4 lane connector serving PR 9922, 
PR 9939 and PR 183 ..............................................
$1,950,000
444. 
PR 
Widening of PR 111 at the intersections of PR–444 
through PR–423 ......................................................
$6,000,000
445. 
PR 
Replacement ferries on Culebra and Vieques 
routes .......................................................................
$2,000,000
446. 
PR 
To build an extension of PR–53 between Yabucoa 
and Maunabo ..........................................................
$5,000,000
447. 
PR 
To build the missing central segment of PR–10, to 
complete one of only two highways crossing 
Puerto Rico North to South ...................................
$5,000,000
448. 
PR 
To revitalize Old San Juan Historic District streets 
$3,000,000
449. 
PR 
Widen Route 835 to provide ready access to 
Guaynado and facilitate housing, industrial, 
commercial, and recreational development ..........
$6,000,000
H. R. 3—366
Transportation Improvements—Continued
No. 
State 
Project Description 
Amount 
450. 
PR 
Construct sidewalks, curbs and gutters in the Mu-
nicipality of Loiza. (PR 187 from Mediania Baja 
to Puente Herrera; Community La Torre, 
Pinones) ...................................................................
$500,000
451. 
PR 
Extension of PR 833, between the PR–177 and the 
PR 2. The extension is approximately of 0.8km ..
$1,000,000
452. 
PR 
Reconstruct various roads throughout the Munici-
pality of Bayamon, including pavings and cold 
millings as well as construction of gutters. (PR 
2; PR 829; PR 830; PR 861; PR 862; PR 840; PR 
29) ............................................................................
$2,000,000
453. 
PR 
Construct extension of 1.04 km to the ‘‘Caridad del 
Cobre’’ Avenue in Bayamon between the PR 199 
and Urb. Canaa ......................................................
$3,000,000
454. 
PR 
Roadway improvements for municipal roads in 
Orocovis ...................................................................
$661,000
455. 
VI 
Christiansted By-Pass Highway, St. Croix ..............
$8,000,000
456. 
VI 
Upgrade West-East Corridor through Charlotte 
Amalie, St. Thomas ................................................
$8,000,000
457. 
MN 
Lake Street Access to I–35W, Minneapolis ..............
$6,000,000
458. 
OH 
Construction, including design and engineering, of 
an approximately 30,000 sq. ft. terminal building 
to accommodate the Trans-Erie ferry service 
which departs the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County 
Port Authority, Cleveland, Ohio ............................
$6,000,000
459. 
NY 
Various transportation projects related to the Des-
tiNY USA project ....................................................
$5,000,000
460. 
CA 
Construction at Lammers Road and I–205 ..............
$5,000,000
461. 
CA 
Feasibility study for constructing SR 130 Realign-
ment project connecting the central valley and 
San Joaquin County and Santa Clara county ......
$6,000,000
462. 
FL 
Coconut Rd. interchange I–75/Lee County ..............
$10,000,000
463. 
AR 
Improvements to U.S. 412 in Northwest Arkansas 
$6,500,000
464. 
CA 
Construction of and improvements to State Route 
239 from State Route 4 in Brentwood area to I–
205 in the area of Tracy .........................................
$10,000,000
465. 
CA 
Design and construction of Camino Tassajara 
Crown Canyon to East Town Project ....................
$5,000,000
466. 
CA 
Engineering right-of-way and construction of I–580 
in the Livermore Valley .........................................
$6,000,000
SEC. 1935. PROJECT FLEXIBILITY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
funds allocated for a project described in subsection (b) in a State
H. R. 3—367
may be obligated for any other project in the State for which 
funds are so allocated, except that the total amount of funds author-
ized for any project for which funds are so allocated shall not 
be reduced. 
(b) PROJECTS.—The projects described in this subsection are—
(1) the projects numbered greater than 3676 listed in the 
table contained in section 1702 of this Act; 
(2) the projects numbered greater than 18 listed in the 
table contained in section 1301 of this Act; 
(3) the projects numbered greater than 27 listed in the 
table contained in section 1302 of this Act; and 
(4) the projects listed in the table contained in section 
1934 of this Act. 
SEC. 1936. ADVANCES. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds apportioned 
to a State under section 104(b) of title 23, United States Code, 
may be obligated to carry out a project designated in any of sections 
1301, 1302, 1306, and 1934 of this Act and sections 117 and 144(g) 
of title 23, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the 
amount authorized for that project, only from a program under 
which the project would be eligible, except that any amounts obli-
gated to carry out the project shall be restored from funds allocated 
for the project. 
SEC. 1937. ROADS IN CLOSED BASINS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall use funds made available 
to carry out section 125 of title 23, United States Code, through 
advancement or reimbursement, without further emergency declara-
tion, to construct such measures as the Secretary determines to 
be necessary for the continuation of roadway services, or the 
impoundment of water to protect roads, or both, at Devils Lake 
in the State of North Dakota, as the Secretary determines to be 
appropriate. 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall carry out construction 
under subsection (a) in accordance with—
(1) the options and needs identified in the report of the 
Devils Lake Surface Transportation Task Force of the Federal 
Highway Administration dated May 4, 2000, and entitled 
‘‘Roadways Serving as Water Barriers’’; 
(2) any needs relating to Devils Lake identified after May 
4, 2000; and 
(3) any monitoring, study, or design or preliminary 
engineering associated with evaluating or constructing the 
measures. 
(c) AFFECTED AREAS.—The Secretary shall carry out construc-
tion under this section in an area that has been the subject of 
an emergency declaration issued during the period beginning on 
January 1, 1993, and ending on the date of enactment of this 
Act. 
(d) FUNDING.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), to 
the extent that expenditures relating to construction under 
this section could not be made pursuant to any other authority 
under section 125 of title 23, United States Code, the expendi-
tures shall not exceed—
(A) $10,000,000 during any fiscal year; and 
(B) a total amount of $70,000,000.
H. R. 3—368
(2) EXCEPTION.—Nothing in paragraph (1) limits any 
expenditure with respect to—
(A) emergency relief in response to a development 
occurring after the date of enactment of this Act; or 
(B) an authority under any other provision of law 
(including section 125 of such title). 
(e) EFFECT OF SECTION.—Nothing in this section authorizes 
or provides funding for the construction, operation, or maintenance 
of an outlet at Devils Lake in the State of North Dakota. 
SEC. 1938. TECHNOLOGY. 
States are encouraged to consider using a nondestructive tech-
nology able to detect cracks including sub-surface flaws as small 
as 0.005 inches in length or depth in steel bridges. 
SEC. 1939. BIA INDIAN ROAD PROGRAM. 
(a) LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN RULE.—The final 
rule effective October 1, 2004, published in the Federal Register, 
July 19, 2004, at pages 43089, relating to the Indian reservation 
road program administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs of 
the Department of the Interior, shall not apply to the following 
Alaska villages with respect to the following projects: 
(1) Craig, Alaska, Craig Community Association, Point St. 
Nicholas Road improvements. 
(2) Cordova, Alaska, Native Village of Eyak, Shepard’s 
Point Road improvements. 
(3) Hydaburg, Alaska, Hydaburg Community Association, 
Hydaburg community street improvements. 
(4) 
Healy 
Lake, 
Alaska, Healy 
Lake 
Tradi-
tional, Cummings Road improvements. 
(b) SPECIAL RULE.—For the villages listed in subsection (a), 
the Indian reservation road program shall be administered by the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs under the rules and regulations in effect 
before the adoption of the final rule referred to in subsection (a), 
and the Secretary shall pay, from amounts made available to carry 
out section 202(d) of title 23, United States Code, for fiscal year 
2006 each of the tribal organizations referred to in subsection 
(a) for the Federal share of the costs of the projects listed in 
subsection (a). 
SEC. 1940. GOING-TO-THE-SUN ROAD, GLACIER NATIONAL PARK, MON-
TANA. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—There is authorized to be appro-
priated to the Secretary from the Highway Trust Fund (other than 
the Mass Transit Account) to resurface, repair, rehabilitate, and 
reconstruct the Going-to-the-Sun Road at Glacier National Park, 
Montana, in accordance with the framework identified in Alter-
native 3 (shared use alternative) of the environmental impact state-
ment and record of decision dated 2003 and relating to the Going-
to-the-Sun Road, to remain available until expended—
(1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2005; 
(2) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 
(3) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 
(4) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and 
(5) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs of the 
project described in subsection (a) shall be 100 percent.
H. R. 3—369
SEC. 1941. BEARTOOTH HIGHWAY, MONTANA. 
(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—Of funds made available for the 
State of Montana for the project for development and construction 
of United States Route 212, Red Lodge North, Montana, as 
described in the table contained in section 1934 (including amounts 
transferred to the project under section 1935), on request of the 
State of Montana, the Secretary shall obligate such sums as are 
necessary to reconstruct the Beartooth Highway in the State of 
Montana. 
(b) REIMBURSEMENT.—The amounts used for reconstruction 
under subsection (a) shall be reimbursed to the project relating 
to United States Route 212 described in subsection (a) on the 
date or dates on which funding is allocated for the Beartooth 
Highway under section 125 of title 23, United States Code. 
(c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share payable for funds allo-
cated for the Beartooth Highway under section 125 of such title 
shall be 100 percent. 
SEC. 1943. GREAT LAKES ITS IMPLEMENTATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make grants to the State 
of Wisconsin to continue intelligent transportation system activities 
in the corridor serving the Greater Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Chicago, 
Illinois, and Gary, Indiana, areas initiated under the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–
240) and other areas of the State of Wisconsin. 
(b) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be appropriated from 
the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) 
$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2008 and $3,000,000 
for fiscal year 2009 to carry out this section. 
(c) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Funds made available to carry out 
this section shall be available for obligation in the same manner 
as if the funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 1944. TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION AND REMEDIATION, 
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall allocate to the State 
of Oklahoma amounts made available to carry out this section 
for the activities described in subsection (b). 
(b) OKLAHOMA PLAN FOR TAR CREEK.—The activities referred 
to in subsection (a) are all activities described in the Oklahoma 
Plan for Tar Creek, including activities under that Plan that are 
to be carried out by involved Federal and State entities. 
(c) FUNDING.—
(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
(A) IN
GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro-
priated from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the 
Mass Transit Account) to carry out this section $10,000,000 
for fiscal year 2006. 
(B) AVAILABILITY.—Funds authorized to be appro-
priated under subparagraph (A) shall remain available 
until expended. 
(2) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Except as otherwise provided 
in this section, funds authorized to be appropriated under this 
section shall be available for obligation in the same manner 
as if the funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, 
United States Code.
H. R. 3—370
(3) TITLE 23 ELIGIBILITY.—Activities described in subsection 
(b) shall be considered to be eligible for funding under any 
program for which funds are apportioned under section 104(b) 
of such title, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment 
of this section. 
SEC. 1945. INFRASTRUCTURE AWARENESS PROGRAM. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—In cooperation with the subcontracting 
production entity that received funds under section 1212(b) of the 
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 193), 
the Secretary shall fund the production of a documentary about 
infrastructure that demonstrates advancements in Alaska, the last 
frontier. 
(b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of produc-
tion of the documentary under subsection (a) shall be 100 percent. 
(c) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be appropriated out of 
the Highway Trust fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) 
to carry out this section $1,500,000 for fiscal year 2005 and 
$1,450,000 for fiscal year 2006. Such fund shall remain available 
until expended. 
(d) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized by this sec-
tion shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if 
such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United 
State Code; except that the Federal share of the cost of production 
of the documentary under this section shall be determined in accord-
ance with this section. 
SEC. 1946. GATEWAY RURAL IMPROVEMENT PILOT PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a pilot program 
in the State of Vermont to be known as the ‘‘Gateway Rural 
Improvement Pilot Program’’ (referred to in this section as the 
‘‘program’’) to demonstrate the benefits to a rural rail corridor 
of a freight transportation gateway program. 
(b) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.—Under the program—
(1) funding preference shall be given to selecting a corridor 
in the State of Vermont that includes a border crossing; and 
(2) individual projects shall provide community and high-
way benefits by addressing economic, congestion, security, 
safety, and environmental issues. 
(c) COST SHARING.—
(1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of a 
project under this section shall be determined in accordance 
with section 120 of title 23, United States Code. 
(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—Project user fees may be used 
to provide all or part of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of a project funded under this section. 
(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In addition to such 
amounts as are otherwise authorized to be appropriated for the 
Department, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary to carry out this section. 
SEC. 1947. ELIGIBLE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 
Section 120(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended 
in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘traffic circles (also known as 
‘roundabouts’),’’ after ‘‘traffic control signalization,’’.
H. R. 3—371
SEC. 1948. EMERGENCY SERVICE ROUTE. 
Notwithstanding any Federal law, regulation, or policy to the 
contrary, no Federal funds shall be obligated or expended for the 
demolition of the existing Brightman Street Bridge connecting Fall 
River and Somerset, Massachusetts, and the existing Brightman 
Street Bridge shall be maintained for pedestrian and bicycle access, 
and as an emergency service route. 
SEC. 1949. KNIK ARM BRIDGE FUNDING CLARIFICATION. 
The Secretary shall provide to the public entity known as 
the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority, established by the State 
of Alaska, funds provided in items 2465 and 3677 in the table 
contained in section 1702, item 2 in the table contained in section 
1934, and item 14 in the table contained in section 1302. 
SEC. 1950. LINCOLN PARISH, LA/I–20 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR 
PROGRAM. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall credit non-Federal 
expenditures paid on or after October 23, 2000, by project sponsors 
of the Lincoln Parish transportation and community and system 
preservation project funded by the Department of Transportation 
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–
346), and the United States Route 167/I–20 interchange Interstate 
maintenance discretionary project funded by the Department of 
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002 
(Public Law 107–87), that are in excess of the non-Federal matching 
requirements for such projects as non-Federal contributions toward 
the non-Federal matching requirements for all LA/I–20 Transpor-
tation Corridor Program elements between Louisiana Route 149 
and Louisiana Route 33. 
(b) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to provide credit 
under subsection (a) expires on September 30, 2009. 
SEC. 1951. BONDING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 
Section 332 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting at the end the following: 
‘‘(e) BONDING ASSISTANCE.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through the 
Minority Resource Center established under subsection (b), 
shall provide assistance in obtaining bid, payment, and perform-
ance bonds by disadvantaged business enterprises pursuant 
to subsection (b)(4). 
‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.—There is author-
ized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for 
each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009 to carry out activities 
under this subsection.’’. 
SEC. 1952. CONGESTION RELIEF. 
The Secretary shall conduct a design and feasibility analysis 
to alleviate southbound traffic congestion along the George Wash-
ington Parkway, Virginia, between Interstate Route 495 and the 
14th Street Bridge and shall take appropriate action in response 
to the results of that analysis. 
SEC. 1953. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out, in accord-
ance with title 23, United States Code, projects under section 1301 
and 1302 of this Act.
H. R. 3—372
SEC. 1954. BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS. 
Section 217(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘in conjunction with such trails, roads, highways, and 
parkways’’. 
SEC. 1955. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF ELY, NEVADA. 
Notwithstanding sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1711, 1712), the 
Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau 
of Land Management, shall convey within 45 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act to the City of Ely, Nevada, subject to 
valid existing rights, without consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in the land located within the railroad 
corridor described in rights-of-way numbered Nev–043230, Nev–
043231, Nev–043232, Nev–43240, Nev–043234, ELKO–03009, 
ELKO–03514, and CC–05887. 
SEC. 1956. BROWNFIELDS GRANTS. 
Section 104(k)(4)(B) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 
9604(k)(4)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(iii) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding clause (i)(IV), 
the Administrator may use up to 25 percent of the 
funds made available to carry out this subsection to 
make a grant or loan under this subsection to eligible 
entities that satisfy all of the elements set forth in 
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective 
purchaser, except that the date of acquisition of the 
property was on or before January 11, 2002.’’. 
SEC. 1957. TRAFFIC CIRCLE CONSTRUCTION, CLARENDON, VERMONT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The State of Vermont agency of transpor-
tation shall—
(1) not later than August 1, 2005, commence planning 
for a traffic circle at the intersection of United States Route 
7 and Vermont Route 103 in Clarendon, Vermont; and 
(2) not later than August 1, 2007, complete construction 
of that traffic circle. 
(b) FUNDING.—From amounts made available to the State of 
Vermont by this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the State 
of Vermont agency of transportation $1,000,000 for use in carrying 
out this section. 
SEC. 1958. LIMITATION ON PROJECT APPROVAL. 
Notwithstanding any provision of title 23, United States Code, 
the Secretary is prohibited from approving any Federal-aid highway 
project in Orange and Seminole Counties, Florida, which provides 
access from Interstate Route 4 to the right-of-way or median of 
Interstate Route 4 if tolls or toll facilities are used for the access 
to the right-of-way or median. 
SEC. 1959. CROSS HARBOR FREIGHT MOVEMENT PROJECT. 
The Secretary shall provide to the public entity known as 
the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, established by 
the States of New York and New Jersey, funds provided for project 
numbered 12 in section 1301 of this Act.
H. R. 3—373
SEC. 1960. DENALI ACCESS SYSTEM PROGRAM. 
The Denali Commission Act of 1998 (42 U.S.C. 3121 note) 
is amended—
(1) by redesignating section 309 as section 310; and 
(2) by inserting after section 308 the following: 
‘‘SEC. 309. DENALI ACCESS SYSTEM PROGRAM. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
THE DENALI ACCESS SYSTEM PRO-
GRAM.—Not later than 3 months after the date of enactment of 
the SAFETEA–LU, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish 
a program to pay the costs of planning, designing, engineering, 
and constructing road and other surface transportation infrastruc-
ture identified for the Denali access system program under this 
section. 
‘‘(b) DENALI ACCESS SYSTEM PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 3 months after the 
date of enactment of the SAFETEA–LU, the Denali Commission 
shall establish a Denali Access System Program Advisory Com-
mittee (referred to in this section as the ‘advisory committee’). 
‘‘(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The advisory committee shall be com-
posed of nine members to be appointed by the Governor of 
the State of Alaska as follows: 
‘‘(A) The chairman of the Denali Commission. 
‘‘(B) Four members who represent existing regional 
native corporations, native nonprofit entities, or tribal 
governments, including one member who is a civil engineer. 
‘‘(C) Four members who represent rural Alaska regions 
or villages, including one member who is a civil engineer. 
‘‘(3) TERMS.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Except for the chairman of the 
Commission who shall remain a member of the advisory 
committee, members shall be appointed to serve a term 
of 4 years. 
‘‘(B) INITIAL
MEMBERS.—Except for the chairman of 
the Commission, of the eight initial members appointed 
to the advisory committee, two shall be appointed for a 
term of 1 year, two shall be appointed for a term of 2 
years, two shall be appointed for a term of 3 years, and 
two shall be appointed for a term of 4 years. All subsequent 
appointments shall be for 4 years. 
‘‘(4) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The advisory committee shall be 
responsible for the following activities: 
‘‘(A) Advising the Commission on the surface transpor-
tation needs of Alaska Native villages and rural commu-
nities, including projects for the construction of essential 
access routes within remote Alaska Native villages and 
rural communities and for the construction of roads and 
facilities necessary to connect isolated rural communities 
to a road system. 
‘‘(B) Advising the Commission on considerations for 
coordinatedtransportation planning among the Alaska 
Native villages, Alaska rural villages, the State of Alaska, 
and other government entities. 
‘‘(C) Establishing a list of transportation priorities for 
Alaska Native village and rural community transportation 
projects on an annual basis, including funding rec-
ommendations.
H. R. 3—374
‘‘(D) Facilitate the Commission’s work on transpor-
tation projects involving more than one region. 
‘‘(5) FACA EXEMPTION.—The provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to 
the advisory committee. 
‘‘(c) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall allocate funding 
authorized and made available for the Denali access system 
program to the Commission to carry out this section. 
‘‘(2) DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDING.—In distributing funds for 
surface transportation projects funded under the program, the 
Commission shall consult the list of transportation priorities 
developed by the advisory committee. 
‘‘(d) PREFERENCE TO ALASKA MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS.—To 
construct a project under this section, the Commission shall encour-
age, to the maximum extent practicable, the use of employees 
and businesses that are residents of Alaska. 
‘‘(e) DESIGN STANDARDS.—Each project carried out under this 
section shall use technology and design standards determined by 
the Commission to be appropriate given the location and the 
functionality of the project. 
‘‘(f) MAINTENANCE.—Funding for a construction project under 
this section may include an additional amount equal to not more 
than 10 percent of the total cost of construction, to be retained 
for future maintenance of the project. All such retained funds 
shall be dedicated for maintenance of the project and may not 
be used for other purposes. 
‘‘(g) LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION.—For purposes of projects car-
ried out under this section, the Commission shall be designated 
as the lead agency for purposes of accepting Federal funds and 
for purposes of carrying out this project. 
‘‘(h) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of law, funds made available to carry out this section may 
be used to meet the non-Federal share of the cost of projects 
under title 23, United States Code. 
‘‘(i) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM TRANSFERABILITY.—
‘‘(1) TRANSFERABILITY.—In any fiscal year, up to 15 percent 
of the amounts made available to the State of Alaska for 
surface transportation by section 133 of title 23, United States 
Code, may be transferred to the Denali access system program. 
‘‘(2) NO EFFECT ON SET-ASIDE.—Paragraph (2) of section 
133(d), United States Code, shall not apply to funds transferred 
under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated 
out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit 
Account) to carry out this section $15,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2006 through 2009. 
‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds made available to 
carry out this section shall be available for obligation in the 
same manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 
1 of title 23, United States Code; except that such funds shall 
not be transferable and shall remain available until expended, 
and the Federal share of the cost of any project carried out 
using such funds shall be determined in accordance with section 
120(b).’’.
H. R. 3—375
SEC. 1961. I–95/CONTEE ROAD INTERCHANGE STUDY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a study on the 
I–95/Contee Road relocated interchange project located in Prince 
George’s County, Maryland. The study shall assess how the pro-
posed interchange will—
(1) leverage Federal investment in the I–95/Contee Road 
relocated interchange project by encouraging a public-private 
partnership between the State of Maryland and the private 
financial interests supporting the project; 
(2) improve overall transportation efficiency in the area 
and enhance fire, rescue, and emergency response in the area; 
(3) complement planned development in the area by pro-
viding sufficient access to the Interstate System; and 
(4) otherwise provide public benefits and revenues. 
(b) DATA COLLECTION.—As part of the study, the Secretary 
shall collect data regarding the economic impact of the project, 
including new jobs and State and county revenues in the form 
of real estate property taxes, retail sales taxes, and income and 
hotel sales and occupancy taxes. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a report on the results of the study, including any 
recommendations of the Secretary. 
(d) FUNDING.—
(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is author-
ized to be appropriated to carry out this section, out of the 
Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account), 
$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2006. 
(2) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Funds authorized to be appro-
priated by this section shall be available for obligation in the 
same manner and to the same extent as if such funds were 
apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; 
except that the Federal share of the cost of the project shall 
be 100 percent, and such funds shall remain available until 
expended and shall not be transferable. 
SEC. 1962. MULTIMODAL FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—The Secretary shall 
make available from funds in the Highway Trust Fund (other 
than the Mass Transit Account) $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
2006 through 2009 for multimodal facility improvements, construc-
tion, and ferry acquisition by North Bay Ferry Service, Inc., located 
at Port Sonoma in Petaluma, California. 
(b) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Funds appropriated to carry out 
this section shall be available for obligation in the same manner 
as if the funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United 
States Code, except that such funds shall remain available until 
expended. 
(c) LIMITATION.—Not more than 50 percent of funds appro-
priated to carry out this section shall be used for facility improve-
ments and construction. 
(d) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal Share of the cost of a facility 
improvement or construction project under this section shall be 
80 percent.
H. R. 3—376
(e) REQUIREMENT.—Ferries to which assistance is provided 
under this section shall be purchased by a United States company 
that designs and builds vessels in the United States. 
SEC. 1963. APOLLO THEATER LEASES. 
Notwithstanding the Public Works and Economic Development 
Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.), or any other provision of 
law, the Economic Development Administration shall, in order to 
facilitate the further financing of the project, approve, without 
compensation to the agency, a series of leases of the Apollo Theater, 
located in Harlem, New York, to be improved by Economic Develop-
ment Administration project numbers 01–01–7308 and 01–01–
07552. 
SEC. 1964. PROJECT FEDERAL SHARE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
only for the States of Alaska, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, 
Oregon, and South Dakota, the Federal share of the cost of a 
project described in subsection (b) shall be determined in accordance 
with section 120(b) of title 23, United States Code. 
(b) PROJECTS.—The projects described in this subsection are—
(1) the projects listed in section 1702; 
(2) the projects listed in section 1301; and 
(3) the projects listed in section 1934.
TITLE II—HIGHWAY SAFETY 
SEC. 2001. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The following sums are authorized to be 
appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass 
Transit Account): 
(1) HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS.—For carrying out section 
402 of title 23, United States Code, $163,680,000 for fiscal 
year 2005, $217,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, $220,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2007, $225,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and 
$235,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(2) HIGHWAY SAFETY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—For 
carrying out section 403 of title 23, United States Code, 
$71,424,000 for fiscal year 2005, $110,000,000 for fiscal year 
2006, $107,750,000 for fiscal year 2007, $107,750,000 for fiscal 
year 2008, and $105,500,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(3) OCCUPANT
PROTECTION
INCENTIVE
GRANTS.—For car-
rying out section 405 of title 23, United States Code, 
$19,840,000 for fiscal year 2005, $25,000,000 for fiscal year 
2006, $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2007, $25,000,000 for fiscal 
year 2008, and $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(4) SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS.—For carrying out 
section 406 of title 23, United States Code, $124,500,000 for 
fiscal year 2006, $124,500,000 for fiscal year 2007, $124,500,000 
for fiscal year 2008, and $124,500,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(5) STATE TRAFFIC SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM IMPROVE-
MENTS.—For carrying out section 408 of title 23, United States 
Code, $34,500,000 for fiscal year 2006, $34,500,000 for fiscal 
year 2007, $34,500,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $34,500,000 
for fiscal year 2009. 
(6) ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING COUNTERMEASURES INCEN-
TIVE GRANT PROGRAM.—For carrying out section 410 of title
H. R. 3—377
23, United States Code, $39,680,000 for fiscal year 2005, 
$120,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, $125,000,000 for fiscal year 
2007, $131,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $139,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2009. 
(7) NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER.—For the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration to carry out chapter 303 of title 
49, United States Code, $3,968,000 for fiscal year 2005, 
$4,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2007, 
$4,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $4,000,000 for fiscal year 
2009. 
(8) HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM.—For carrying 
out section 2009 of this title $29,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, 
$29,000,000 for fiscal year 2007, $29,000,000 for fiscal year 
2008, and $29,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(9) MOTORCYCLIST SAFETY.—For carrying out section 2010 
of this title $6,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, $6,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2007, $6,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $7,000,000 
for fiscal year 2009. 
(10) CHILD SAFETY AND CHILD BOOSTER SEAT SAFETY INCEN-
TIVE
GRANTS.—For carrying out section 2011 of this title 
$6,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, $6,000,000 for fiscal year 2007, 
$6,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $7,000,000 for fiscal year 
2009. 
(11) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—For administrative and 
related operating expenses of the National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration in carrying out chapter 4 of title 23, 
United States Code, and this title $17,500,000 for fiscal year 
2006, $17,750,000 for fiscal year 2007, $18,250,000 for fiscal 
year 2008, and $18,500,000 for fiscal year 2009. 
(b) PROHIBITION ON OTHER USES.—Except as otherwise pro-
vided in chapter 4 of title 23, United States Code, and this title, 
(including the amendments made by this title), the amounts made 
available from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass 
Transit Account) for a program under such chapter shall only 
be used to carry out such program and may not be used by States 
or local governments for construction purposes. 
(c) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Except as otherwise provided 
in chapter 4 of title 23, United States Code, and this title, amounts 
made available under subsection (a) for each of fiscal years 2005 
through 2009 shall be available for obligation in the same manner 
as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, 
United States Code. 
(d) TRANSFERS.—In each fiscal year, the Secretary may transfer 
any amounts remaining available under paragraph (3), (5), or (6) 
of subsection (a) to the amounts made available under any other 
of such paragraphs in order to ensure, to the maximum extent 
possible, that each State receives the maximum incentive funding 
for which the State is eligible under sections 405, 408, and 410 
of title 23, United States Code. 
(e) CLARIFICATIONS.—The amounts made available by each of 
subsections (a)(1) through (a)(7) shall be less any amounts made 
available from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass 
Transit Account) by laws enacted before the date of enactment 
of this Act for the respective programs referred to in each of such 
subsections for fiscal year 2005. Amounts authorized by such sub-
sections are post-rescission and shall not be subject to any rescission 
after the date of enactment of this Act.