H. R. 7776—1216 
(1) A discussion of existing, updated, or new guidance 
requiring all elements of the intelligence community to main-
tain current and complete diversity strategic plans that contain 
specific objectives, timeframes, and responsibilities. 
(2) A discussion of progress made by individual elements 
toward maintaining such plans. 
(3) A discussion of existing, updated, or new guidance to 
ensure individual elements develop performance measures to 
assess the contribution of activities toward achieving diversity 
goals and overall progress. 
(4) A discussion of progress made by individual elements 
toward developing measures to assess progress toward 
achieving diversity management efforts. 
(5) A discussion of existing, updated, or new guidance 
ensuring that each element routinely identifies and takes steps 
toward eliminating barriers to workforce diversity. 
(6) A discussion of steps taken by the Director to ensure 
that individual elements are routinely completing required 
assessments to identify and eliminate barriers to diversity. 
(7) A discussion of steps taken by the Director to establish 
specific implementation objectives and timeframes for the ele-
ments that support intelligence community-wide diversity goals 
to ensure the elements are held accountable for making 
progress. 
SEC. 6818. REPORT ON TRANSITION OF NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE 
OFFICE TO DIGITAL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Potential foreign adversaries are outpacing the United 
States in the fielding of new generations of space systems 
that dull the edge the United States has enjoyed in space. 
(2) A digital engineering environment, also known as digital 
systems engineering, reduces the time to field new space sys-
tems. 
(3) Digital engineering environment tools enable the rapid 
iterations of requirements and architectures into digital system 
depictions capable of use by private industry to further the 
design and development of space systems. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, 
to maintain a competitive advantage in space, the National Recon-
naissance Office should transition to a digital engineering environ-
ment by not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National 
Reconnaissance Office shall submit to the appropriate congres-
sional committees a report that contains the following: 
(A) A plan for the transition of the National Reconnais-
sance Office to a digital engineering environment. 
(B) An identification of the date by which such transi-
tion shall be completed. 
(C) A description of the metrics the Director plans 
to use to measure progress made with respect to such 
transition and resulting efficiencies gained. 
(D) A description of the initial pilot programs of the 
National 
Reconnaissance 
Office 
relating 
to 
digital
H. R. 7776—1217 
engineering and the plans to expand such pilot programs 
in scale and scope with respect to acquisition carried out 
under such pilot programs. 
(E) A description of any training requirements or cer-
tifications necessary to advance a digital engineering 
environment within the National Reconnaissance Office. 
(F) A description of how the Director plans to incor-
porate input and best practices from private industry to 
facilitate and accelerate the transition of the National 
Reconnaissance Office to a digital engineering environment. 
(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the congressional intelligence committees; and 
(2) the congressional defense committees (as defined in 
section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code). 
SEC. 6819. BRIEFING ON DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 
‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means the following: 
(A) The congressional intelligence committees. 
(B) The Committee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of 
the Senate. 
(C) The Committee on Homeland Security and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representa-
tives. 
(2) COMPONENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECU-
RITY.—The term ‘‘component of the Department of Homeland 
Security’’ means the following components of the Department 
of Homeland Security: 
(A) The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security 
Agency Threat Management Division. 
(B) The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
Protection and National Preparedness, Office of Counterter-
rorism and Security Preparedness. 
(C) The Transportation Security Administration Office 
of Intelligence and Analysis. 
(D) The United States Citizenship and Immigration 
Services Fraud Detection and National Security Direc-
torate, Field Operations Directorate, and Collateral Duty 
Intelligence. 
(E) The United States Customs and Border Protection 
Office of Intelligence. 
(F) The United States Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations, Office of 
Intelligence, and Special Agent in Charge Intelligence Pro-
gram. 
(3) 
INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITY.—The 
term 
‘‘intelligence 
activity’’ shall be interpreted consistent with how such term 
is used in section 502 of the National Security Act of 1947 
(50 U.S.C. 3092).
H. R. 7776—1218 
(b) BRIEFING ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with 
section 501 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091), 
not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Chief Intelligence Officer of the Department of Homeland 
Security shall provide the appropriate congressional committees 
a briefing on the intelligence activities of elements of the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security that are not elements of the intelligence 
community. Such briefing shall include the following: 
(1) A comprehensive description of all intelligence activities 
conducted during the period beginning on January 1, 2018, 
and ending on the date of the briefing, by any component 
of the Department of Homeland Security that conducts intel-
ligence activities. 
(2) With respect to each such intelligence activity, a descrip-
tion of the activity, including, at a minimum— 
(A) the nature of the activity; 
(B) the component undertaking the activity; 
(C) the legal authority for such activity; and 
(D) the source of funding for such activity. 
(3) A description and the quantity of any types of finished 
intelligence products, or intelligence information reports, pro-
duced or contributed to by a component of the Department 
of Homeland Security that conducts intelligence activities 
during the period specified in paragraph (1). 
(4) An identification of any external or internal guidelines, 
policies, processes, practices, or programs governing the collec-
tion, retention, analysis, or dissemination by such a component 
of information regarding United States citizens, lawful perma-
nent residents of the United States, or individuals located 
within the United States. 
(c) FORM.—The briefing under subsection (b) may be provided 
in classified form. 
(d) ADDITIONAL BRIEFINGS.—Not later than 1 year after the 
date on which the Chief Intelligence Officer provides the briefing 
under subsection (b) and not less frequently than once each year 
thereafter, the Chief Intelligence Officer shall provide the appro-
priate congressional committees a briefing on any new intelligence 
activities commenced by any component of the Department of Home-
land Security and any that have been terminated. 
SEC. 6820. REPORT ON DECLASSIFICATION EFFORTS OF CENTRAL 
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. 
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency 
shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Sub-
committee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the 
Senate, and the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on the 
declassification efforts of the Central Intelligence Agency. Such 
report shall include— 
(1) an identification of the resources that are dedicated 
to such efforts; and 
(2) an assessment as to whether such resources are suffi-
cient.
H. R. 7776—1219 
SEC. 6821. REPORT ON NATIONAL SPACE INTELLIGENCE CENTER. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2023, the Director of 
National Intelligence, in coordination with the Chief of Space Oper-
ations, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 
a report on the National Space Intelligence Center. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the status of the National Space Intel-
ligence Center since the activation of the Center and the 
implications of the Center being aligned under a Field Com-
mand rather than a field operating agency aligned to the 
Director of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance of 
the Space Force. 
(2) A review of the ability of the Center to address the 
full set of national space intelligence analytical demands 
(including with respect to acquisition and operational mission 
requirements of the Space Force, the Department of Defense, 
the intelligence community, and other national customers) 
while being assigned as a subordinate to Space Operations 
Command, a Field Command, including— 
(A) an assessment of the ability of the Center to 
respond to the broadest space intelligence requirements 
as compared to a service specific need; and 
(B) a review specifically addressing any perceived mis-
sion misalignment, potential mitigating measures, or other 
structural organization concerns. 
(3) An assessment of— 
(A) the current resourcing posture, including any addi-
tional personnel required as a result of subordination to 
a Field Command; and 
(B) the resourcing posture if the Center were aligned 
to the Director of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnais-
sance of the Space Force as described in paragraph (1). 
(4) Lessons learned since unit activation, including with 
respect to— 
(A) organizational efficiencies and inefficiencies; 
(B) financial implications; 
(C) organizational redundancy; 
(D) parity mismatch and synergies with other service 
intelligence centers; and 
(E) lessons learned through comparisons to other 
service intelligence centers organized as a field operating 
agency and aligned under the senior intelligence officer 
of the respective Armed Force. 
(c) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted 
in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means the fol-
lowing: 
(1) The congressional intelligence committees. 
(2) The congressional defense committees (as defined in 
section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code).