HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 3054. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois. 
Sec. 3055. Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana. 
Sec. 3056. Koontz Lake, Indiana. 
Sec. 3057. Little Calumet River, Indiana. 
Sec. 3058. White River, Indiana. 
Sec. 3059. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa. 
Sec. 3060. Prestonsburg, Kentucky. 
Sec. 3061. Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish 
Watershed. 
Sec. 3062. Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana. 
Sec. 3063. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana. 
Sec. 3064. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana. 
Sec. 3065. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, 
Louisiana. 
Sec. 3066. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana. 
Sec. 3067. New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana. 
Sec. 3068. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), Lou-
isiana. 
Sec. 3069. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine. 
Sec. 3070. Union River, Maine. 
Sec. 3071. Gwynns Falls Watershed, Baltimore, Maryland. 
Sec. 3072. Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. 
Sec. 3073. Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan. 
Sec. 3074. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan. 
Sec. 3075. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan. 
Sec. 3076. Ada, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3077. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3078. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3079. Granite Falls, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3080. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3081. Red Lake River, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3082. Silver Bay, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3083. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3084. Two Harbors, Minnesota. 
Sec. 3085. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi. 
Sec. 3086. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi. 
Sec. 3087. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. 
Sec. 3088. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri. 
Sec. 3089. River Des Peres, Missouri. 
Sec. 3090. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska. 
Sec. 3091. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska. 
Sec. 3092. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey. 
Sec. 3093. Passaic River Basin flood management, New Jersey. 
Sec. 3094. Buffalo Harbor, New York. 
Sec. 3095. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York. 
Sec. 3096. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey. 
Sec. 3097. New York State Canal System. 
Sec. 3098. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Ohio. 
Sec. 3099. Mahoning River, Ohio. 
Sec. 3100. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma. 
Sec. 3101. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma. 
Sec. 3102. Willamette River temperature control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon. 
Sec. 3103. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. 
Sec. 3104. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 3105. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 3106. Solomon’s Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 3107. South Central Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 3108. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 3109. Cedar Bayou, Texas. 
Sec. 3110. Freeport Harbor, Texas. 
Sec. 3111. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. 
Sec. 3112. Lake Kemp, Texas. 
Sec. 3113. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas. 
Sec. 3114. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas. 
Sec. 3115. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas. 
Sec. 3116. Proctor Lake, Texas. 
Sec. 3117. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas. 
Sec. 3118. James River, Virginia. 
Sec. 3119. Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, and Wise Counties, Virginia. 
Sec. 3120. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia. 
Sec. 3121. Duwamish/Green, Washington. 
Sec. 3122. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington. 
Sec. 3123. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia. 
Sec. 3124. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia. 
Sec. 3125. Northern West Virginia. 
Sec. 3126. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin. 
Sec. 3127. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs. 
Sec. 3128. Continuation of project authorizations. 
Sec. 3129. Project reauthorizations. 
Sec. 3130. Project deauthorizations. 
Sec. 3131. Land conveyances. 
Sec. 3132. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use restrictions. 
TITLE IV—STUDIES 
Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin program. 
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites. 
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study. 
Sec. 4004. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan. 
Sec. 4005. Delaware River. 
Sec. 4006. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska. 
Sec. 4007. Kuskokwim River, Alaska. 
Sec. 4008. St. George Harbor, Alaska. 
Sec. 4009. Susitna River, Alaska. 
Sec. 4010. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona. 
Sec. 4011. Searcy County, Arkansas. 
Sec. 4012. Dry Creek Valley, California. 
Sec. 4013. Elkhorn Slough estuary, California. 
Sec. 4014. Fresno, Kings, and Kern Counties, California. 
Sec. 4015. Los Angeles River, California. 
Sec. 4016. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California. 
Sec. 4017. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California. 
Sec. 4018. Napa River, St. Helena, California. 
Sec. 4019. Orick, California. 
Sec. 4020. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California. 
Sec. 4021. Sacramento River, California. 
Sec. 4022. San Diego County, California. 
Sec. 4023. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 4024. South San Francisco Bay shoreline study, California. 
Sec. 4025. Twentynine Palms, California. 
Sec. 4026. Yucca Valley, California. 
Sec. 4027. Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colorado. 
Sec. 4028. Roaring Fork River, Basalt, Colorado. 
Sec. 4029. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
Delaware. 
Sec. 4030. Collier County beaches, Florida. 
Sec. 4031. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida. 
Sec. 4032. Meriwether County, Georgia. 
Sec. 4033. Tybee Island, Georgia. 
Sec. 4034. Kaukonahua-Helemano watershed, Oahu, Hawaii. 
Sec. 4035. West Maui, Maui, Hawaii. 
Sec. 4036. Boise River, Idaho. 
Sec. 4037. Ballard’s Island Side Channel, Illinois. 
Sec. 4038. Chicago, Illinois. 
Sec. 4039. South Branch, Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois. 
Sec. 4040. Utica, Illinois. 
Sec. 4041. Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana. 
Sec. 4042. Salem, Indiana. 
Sec. 4043. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky. 
Sec. 4044. Dewey Lake, Kentucky. 
Sec. 4045. Louisville, Kentucky. 
Sec. 4046. Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, Louisiana. 
Sec. 4047. Offshore oil and gas fabrication ports, Louisiana. 
Sec. 4048. Vermilion River, Louisiana. 
Sec. 4049. West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana. 
Sec. 4050. Patapsco River, Maryland. 
Sec. 4051. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island. 
Sec. 4052. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan. 
Sec. 4053. St. Clair River, Michigan. 
Sec. 4054. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin. 
Sec. 4055. Wild Rice River, Minnesota. 
Sec. 4056. Mississippi coastal area, Mississippi. 
Sec. 4057. Northeast Mississippi. 
Sec. 4058. St. Louis, Missouri. 
Sec. 4059. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4060. Bayonne, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4061. Carteret, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4062. Elizabeth River, Elizabeth, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4063. Gloucester County, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4064. Perth Amboy, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4065. Wreck Pond, Monmouth County, New Jersey. 
Sec. 4066. Batavia, New York. 
Sec. 4067. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York. 
Sec. 4068. East Chester Bay, Turtle Cove, New York. 
Sec. 4069. Finger Lakes, New York. 
Sec. 4070. Hudson-Raritan Estuary, New York and New Jersey. 
Sec. 4071. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York. 
Sec. 4072. Newtown Creek, New York. 
Sec. 4073. Niagara River, New York. 
Sec. 4074. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York. 
Sec. 4075. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York. 
Sec. 4076. Lincoln County, North Carolina. 
Sec. 4077. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 4078. Yadkinville, North Carolina. 
Sec. 4079. Cincinnati, Ohio. 
Sec. 4080. Euclid, Ohio. 
Sec. 4081. Lake Erie, Ohio. 
Sec. 4082. Ohio River, Ohio. 
Sec. 4083. Sutherlin, Oregon. 
Sec. 4084. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon. 
Sec. 4085. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon. 
Sec. 4086. Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon. 
Sec. 4087. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4088. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4089. North Central Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4090. Northampton and Lehigh Counties streams, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4091. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction. 
Sec. 4092. Williamsport, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4093. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 4094. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico. 
Sec. 4095. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina. 
Sec. 4096. Broad River, York County, South Carolina. 
Sec. 4097. Georgetown and Williamsburg Counties, South Carolina. 
Sec. 4098. Chattanooga, Tennessee. 
Sec. 4099. Cleveland, Tennessee. 
Sec. 4100. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee. 
Sec. 4101. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee. 
Sec. 4102. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis Tennessee. 
Sec. 4103. Abilene, Texas. 
Sec. 4104. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas. 
Sec. 4105. Fort Bend County, Texas. 
Sec. 4106. Harris County, Texas. 
Sec. 4107. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. 
Sec. 4108. Port of Galveston, Texas. 
Sec. 4109. Roma Creek, Texas. 
Sec. 4110. Walnut Creek, Texas. 
Sec. 4111. Grand County and Moab, Utah. 
Sec. 4112. Southwestern Utah. 
Sec. 4113. Chowan River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina. 
Sec. 4114. James River, Richmond, Virginia. 
Sec. 4115. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington. 
Sec. 4116. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia. 
Sec. 4117. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin. 
Sec. 4118. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. 
TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 
Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels. 
Sec. 5002. Watershed management. 
Sec. 5003. Dam safety. 
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations. 
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas. 
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects. 
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
projects. 
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects. 
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment. 
Sec. 5010. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 5011. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project. 
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration. 
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation. 
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes tributary model. 
Sec. 5015. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River Basins. 
Sec. 5016. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration and Protection Pro-
gram. 
Sec. 5017. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration. 
Sec. 5018. Hypoxia assessment. 
Sec. 5019. Potomac River Watershed Assessment and Tributary Strategy Eval-
uation and Monitoring Program. 
Sec. 5020. Lock and dam security. 
Sec. 5021. Rehabilitation. 
Sec. 5022. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake River 
Salmon survival. 
Sec. 5023. Wage surveys. 
Sec. 5024. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. 
Sec. 5025. Tallapoosa, Alabama. 
Sec. 5026. Alaska. 
Sec. 5027. Barrow, Alaska. 
Sec. 5028. Coffman Cove, Alaska. 
Sec. 5029. Fire Island, Alaska. 
Sec. 5030. Fort Yukon, Alaska. 
Sec. 5031. Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska. 
Sec. 5032. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska. 
Sec. 5033. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska. 
Sec. 5034. Tanana River, Alaska. 
Sec. 5035. Valdez, Alaska. 
Sec. 5036. Whittier, Alaska. 
Sec. 5037. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska. 
Sec. 5038. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas. 
Sec. 5039. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas. 
Sec. 5040. Loomis Landing, Arkansas. 
Sec. 5041. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri. 
Sec. 5042. White River basin, Arkansas. 
Sec. 5043. Cambria, California. 
Sec. 5044. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; Mallard 
Slough, Pittsburg, California. 
Sec. 5045. Dana Point Harbor, California. 
Sec. 5046. East San Joaquin County, California. 
Sec. 5047. Eastern Santa Clara Basin, California. 
Sec. 5048. LA–3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, California. 
Sec. 5049. Lancaster, California. 
Sec. 5050. Ontario and Chino, California. 
Sec. 5051. Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, California. 
Sec. 5052. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, 
California. 
Sec. 5053. Sacramento deep water ship channel, California. 
Sec. 5054. San Francisco, California. 
Sec. 5055. San Francisco, California, waterfront area. 
Sec. 5056. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh ecosystem 
restoration. 
Sec. 5057. Santa Venetia, California. 
Sec. 5058. Stockton, California. 
Sec. 5059. Victor V. Veysey Dam, California.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 5060. Whittier, California. 
Sec. 5061. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, Con-
necticut. 
Sec. 5062. Christina River shipwreck, Delaware. 
Sec. 5063. Anacostia River, District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. 
Sec. 5064. Florida Keys water quality improvements. 
Sec. 5065. Lake Worth, Florida. 
Sec. 5066. Lake Lanier, Georgia. 
Sec. 5067. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho. 
Sec. 5068. Reconstruction of Illinois flood protection projects. 
Sec. 5069. Kaskaskia River Basin, Illinois, restoration. 
Sec. 5070. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois. 
Sec. 5071. Natalie Creek, Midlothian and Oak Forest, Illinois. 
Sec. 5072. Illinois River basin restoration. 
Sec. 5073. Promontory Point, Lake Michigan, Illinois. 
Sec. 5074. Southwest Illinois. 
Sec. 5075. Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana. 
Sec. 5076. Calumet region, Indiana. 
Sec. 5077. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa. 
Sec. 5078. Rathbun Lake, Iowa. 
Sec. 5079. Cumberland River basin, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5080. Louisville, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5081. Mayfield Creek and tributaries, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5082. North Fork, Kentucky River, Breathitt County, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5083. Paducah, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5084. Southern and eastern Kentucky. 
Sec. 5085. Winchester, Kentucky. 
Sec. 5086. Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 
Sec. 5087. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana. 
Sec. 5088. Cross Lake, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Sec. 5089. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana. 
Sec. 5090. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. 
Sec. 5091. Charlestown, Maryland. 
Sec. 5092. Delmarva Conservation Corridor, Maryland and Delaware. 
Sec. 5093. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites. 
Sec. 5094. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan. 
Sec. 5095. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan. 
Sec. 5096. Crookston, Minnesota. 
Sec. 5097. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota. 
Sec. 5098. Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
Sec. 5099. Northeastern Minnesota. 
Sec. 5100. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi. 
Sec. 5101. Mississippi River, Missouri, and Illinois. 
Sec. 5102. St. Louis, Missouri. 
Sec. 5103. Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey. 
Sec. 5104. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey. 
Sec. 5105. Central New Mexico, New Mexico. 
Sec. 5106. Atlantic Coast of New York. 
Sec. 5107. College Point, New York City, New York. 
Sec. 5108. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York. 
Sec. 5109. Hudson River, New York. 
Sec. 5110. Mount Morris Dam, New York. 
Sec. 5111. Onondaga Lake, New York. 
Sec. 5112. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina. 
Sec. 5113. Stanly County, North Carolina.
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 5114. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina. 
Sec. 5115. Ohio. 
Sec. 5116. Toussaint River, Ohio. 
Sec. 5117. Eugene, Oregon. 
Sec. 5118. John Day Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla, Oregon and Washington. 
Sec. 5119. Lowell, Oregon. 
Sec. 5120. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 5121. Clinton County, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 5122. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 5123. Northeast Pennsylvania. 
Sec. 5124. Upper Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania and New York. 
Sec. 5125. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 
Sec. 5126. Beaufort and Jasper Counties, South Carolina. 
Sec. 5127. East Tennessee. 
Sec. 5128. Fritz Landing, Tennessee. 
Sec. 5129. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee. 
Sec. 5130. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee. 
Sec. 5131. Tennessee River partnership. 
Sec. 5132. Upper Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mis-
sissippi. 
Sec. 5133. Bosque River watershed, Texas. 
Sec. 5134. Dallas County region, Texas. 
Sec. 5135. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas. 
Sec. 5136. Harris County, Texas. 
Sec. 5137. Onion Creek, Texas. 
Sec. 5138. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia. 
Sec. 5139. Eastern Shore and southwest Virginia. 
Sec. 5140. James River, Virginia. 
Sec. 5141. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington. 
Sec. 5142. Hamilton Island campground, Washington. 
Sec. 5143. Puget Island, Washington. 
Sec. 5144. Willapa Bay, Washington. 
Sec. 5145. Bluestone, West Virginia. 
Sec. 5146. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control. 
Sec. 5147. Lower Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia. 
Sec. 5148. Central West Virginia. 
Sec. 5149. Southern West Virginia. 
Sec. 5150. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin. 
Sec. 5151. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal interests. 
Sec. 5152. Use of Federal hopper dredge fleet. 
Sec. 5153. Additional assistance for critical projects. 
TITLE VI—FLORIDA EVERGLADES 
Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida. 
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects. 
Sec. 6003. Maximum cost of projects. 
Sec. 6004. Project authorization. 
Sec. 6005. Credit. 
Sec. 6006. Outreach and assistance. 
Sec. 6007. Critical restoration projects. 
Sec. 6008. Deauthorizations. 
Sec. 6009. Modified water delivery. 
TITLE VII—LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA
HR 2864 PCS 
Sec. 7001. Definitions. 
Sec. 7002. Additional Reports. 
Sec. 7003. Coastal Louisiana ecosystem protection and restoration task force. 
Sec. 7004. Investigations. 
Sec. 7005. Construction. 
Sec. 7006. Non-Federal cost share. 
Sec. 7007. Project justification. 
Sec. 7008. Statutory Construction. 
TITLE VIII—UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY 
SYSTEM 
Sec. 8001. Definitions. 
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration. 
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements. 
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization. 
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress. 
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. 
In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Sec-
retary of the Army. 
TITLE I—WATER RESOURCES 
PROJECTS 
SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. 
(a) PROJECTS WITH CHIEF’S REPORT.—Except as 
otherwise provided in this section, the following projects 
for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Sec-
retary substantially in accordance with the plans, and sub-
ject to the conditions, described in the respective reports 
designated in this section: 
(1) AKUTAN, ALASKA.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for naviga-
tion, Akutan, Alaska: Report of the Chief of
HR 2864 PCS 
Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total 
cost of $19,700,000. 
(B) TREATMENT
OF
CERTAIN
DREDG-
ING.—The headlands dredging for the mooring 
basin shall be considered a general navigation 
feature for purposes of estimating the non-Fed-
eral share of the cost of the project. 
(2) HAINES
SMALL
BOAT
HARBOR, HAINES, 
ALASKA.—The project for navigation, Haines Small 
Boat Harbor, Haines, Alaska: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total of 
$12,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$9,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,500,000. 
(3) TANQUE
VERDE
CREEK, ARIZONA.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde 
Creek, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $4,978,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $3,236,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,742,000. 
(4) VA SHLY’ AY AKIMEL, SALT RIVER RES-
TORATION, ARIZONA.—The project for ecosystem 
restoration, Va Shly’ Ay Akimel, Salt River, Ari-
zona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Janu-
ary 3, 2005, at a total cost of $138,968,000, with
HR 2864 PCS 
an estimated Federal cost of $90,129,000 and an es-
timated non-Federal cost of $48,839,000. 
(5) HAMILTON CITY, CALIFORNIA.—The project 
for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restora-
tion, Hamilton City, California: Report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $50,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $33,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of 
$17,600,000. 
(6) 
IMPERIAL
BEACH, 
CALIFORNIA.—The 
project for storm damage reduction, Imperial Beach, 
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $11,862,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $7,592,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,270,000, and at 
an estimated total cost of $38,004,000 for periodic 
beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
project, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$19,002,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$19,002,000. 
(7) MATILIJA DAM, VENTURA COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—The project for ecosystem restoration, 
Matilija Dam and Ventura River Watershed, Ven-
tura County, California: Report of the Chief of En-
gineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of
HR 2864 PCS 
$130,335,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$78,973,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$51,362,000. 
(8) MIDDLE
CREEK, LAKE
COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA.—The project for ecosystem restoration and 
flood damage reduction, Middle Creek, Lake County, 
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $41,793,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $27,256,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,537,000. 
(9) NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH, CALIFORNIA.— 
(A) IN
GENERAL.—The project for eco-
system restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh, 
Nap River, California: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $100,500,000, with an estimated Fed-
eral cost of $64,000,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal cost of $36,500,000. 
(B) PROJECT FEATURES.—In carrying out 
the project, the Secretary shall include con-
struction of a recycled water pipeline extending 
from the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation Dis-
trict Waste Water Treatment Plant and the 
Napa Sanitation District Waste Water Treat-
ment Plant as part of the project and restora-
HR 2864 PCS 
tion and enhancement of Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, 
and 3. 
(10) SOUTH
PLATTE
RIVER, DENVER, COLO-
RADO.—The project for environmental restoration 
Denver County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, 
Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $18,824,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $12,236,000 and an es-
timated non-Federal cost of $6,588,000. 
(11) MIAMI
HARBOR, MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for naviga-
tion, Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Flor-
ida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
April 25, 2005, at a total cost of $121,127,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $64,843,000 
and 
an 
estimated 
non-Federal 
cost 
of 
$56,284,000. 
(B) GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT.— 
The non-Federal share of the cost of the gen-
eral reevaluation report that resulted in the re-
port of the Chief of Engineers referred to in 
subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage 
as the non-Federal share of cost of construction 
of the project.
HR 2864 PCS 
(C) AGREEMENT.—The Secretary shall 
enter into a new partnership with the non-Fed-
eral interest to reflect the cost sharing required 
by subparagraph (B). 
(12) EAST
ST. LOUIS
AND
VICINITY, ILLI-
NOIS.—The project for ecosystem restoration, East 
St. Louis and vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $191,158,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $123,807,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $67,351,000. 
(13) PEORIA
RIVERFRONT, 
ILLINOIS.—The 
project for environmental restoration, Peoria River-
front, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost of $16,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $10,400,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,600,000. 
(14) BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LOUISIANA.—The 
project for navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Lou-
isiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Janu-
ary 3, 2005, at a total cost of $9,000,000. The costs 
of construction of the project shall be paid 1⁄2 from 
amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
Treasury and 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from 
the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
HR 2864 PCS 
(15) MORGANZA
TO
THE
GULF
OF
MEXICO, 
LOUISIANA.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for hurri-
cane and storm damage reduction, Morganza to 
the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports of the 
Chief of Engineers, dated August 23, 2002, and 
July 22, 2003, at a total cost of $788,000,000 
with an estimated Federal cost of $512,200,000 
and 
an 
estimated 
non-Federal 
cost 
of 
$275,800,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of design and construction work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the project. 
(16) SWOPE
PARK
INDUSTRIAL
AREA, MIS-
SOURI.—The project for flood damage reduction, 
Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: Report of the 
Chief of Engineers, dated December 30, 2003, at a 
total cost of $15,683,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $10,194,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $5,489,000.
HR 2864 PCS 
(17) MANASQUAN TO BARNEGAT INLET, NEW 
JERSEY.—The project for hurricane and storm dam-
age reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat Inlet, New 
Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated De-
cember 30, 2003, at a total cost of $65,800,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $42,800,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,000,000, and 
at an estimated total cost of $108,000,000 for peri-
odic beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
project, 
with 
an 
estimated 
Federal 
cost 
of 
$54,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$54,000,000. 
(18) SOUTH RIVER, NEW JERSEY.—The project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction and envi-
ronmental restoration, South River, New Jersey: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003, 
at a total cost of $112,623,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $73,205,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal cost of $39,418,000. 
(19) SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW 
MEXICO.—The project for flood damage reduction, 
Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico: Report 
of the Chief of Engineers dated November 29, 2004, 
at a total cost of $19,494,000, with an estimated
HR 2864 PCS 
Federal cost of $12,671,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal cost of $6,823,000. 
(20) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, CORPUS 
CHRISTI, TEXAS.—The project for navigation and 
environmental restoration, Corpus Christi Ship 
Channel, Texas, Channel Improvement Project: Re-
port of the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, 
at a total cost of $172,940,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $80,086,000 and an estimated non- 
Federal cost of $92,823,000. 
(21) GULF
INTRACOASTAL
WATERWAY, HIGH 
ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER, TEXAS.—The project for 
navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Sabine 
River to Corpus Christi, Texas: Report of the Chief 
of Engineers, dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost 
of $13,104,000. The costs of construction of the 
project are to be paid 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated 
from the general fund of the Treasury and 1⁄2 from 
amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways 
Trust Fund. 
(22) MATAGORDA BAY, TEXAS.—The project for 
navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos 
River to Port O’Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, 
Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated De-
cember 24, 2002, at a total cost of $15,960,000.
HR 2864 PCS 
The costs of construction of the project are to be 
paid 1⁄2 from amounts appropriated from the general 
fund of the Treasury and 1⁄2 from amounts appro-
priated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
(23) 
RIVERSIDE
OXBOW, 
FORT
WORTH, 
TEXAS.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for envi-
ronmental restoration, Riverside Oxbow, Fort 
Worth, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated May 29, 2003, at a total cost of 
$25,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$10,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $14,800,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of design and construction work 
carried out on the Beach Street Dam and asso-
ciated features by the non-Federal interest be-
fore the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the project. 
(24) DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.— 
The project for the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 
Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Vir-
HR 2864 PCS 
ginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated March 
3, 2003, at a Federal cost of $35,573,000. 
(25) CHEHALIS
RIVER, 
CENTRALIA, 
WASH-
INGTON.— 
(A) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood 
damage reduction, Chehalis River, Centralia, 
Washington: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated September 27, 2004, at a total cost of 
$109,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $66,425,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $43,425,000. 
(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall— 
(i) credit up to $6,500,000 toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for the cost of planning and design 
work carried out by the non-Federal inter-
est in accordance with the project study 
plan dated November 28, 1999; and 
(ii) credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of 
design and construction work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the project.
HR 2864 PCS 
(C) ADDITIONAL
FLOOD
STORAGE
AT 
SKOOKUMCHUCK DAM.—The Secretary shall in-
tegrate into the project the locally preferred 
plan to provide an additional 9,000 acre-feet of 
storage capacity at Skookumchuck Dam, Wash-
ington, upon a determination by the Secretary 
that providing such additional storage capacity 
is feasible. 
(b) PROJECTS SUBJECT TO FINAL REPORT.—The 
following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes are authorized to be car-
ried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in 
a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable re-
port of the Chief is completed not later than December 
31, 2005: 
(1) DES MOINES/RACCOON RIVERS, IOWA.—The 
project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines/Rac-
coon Rivers, Iowa, at a total cost of $10,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $6,500,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,500,000. 
(2) PORT OF IBERIA, LOUISIANA.—The project 
for navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana, at a total 
cost of $194,000,000, with an estimated Federal
HR 2864 PCS 
cost of $123,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $71,000,000. 
(3) 
HUDSON-RARITAN
ESTUARY, 
LIBERTY 
STATE PARK, NEW JERSEY.—The project for envi-
ronmental restoration, Hudson-Raritan Estuary, 
Liberty State Park, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
$32,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$20,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$11,200,000. 
(4) RARITAN AND SANDY HOOK BAYS, UNION 
BEACH, NEW
JERSEY.—The project for hurricane 
and storm damage reduction, Raritan and Sandy 
Hook Bays, Union Beach, New Jersey, at a total 
cost of $99,095,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $64,412,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $34,683,000. 
(5) HOCKING
RIVER, MONDAY
CREEK
SUB- 
BASIN, OHIO.—The project for environmental res-
toration, Hocking River, Monday Creek Sub-basin, 
Ohio, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with an esti-
mated Federal cost of $17,000,000 and an esti-
mated non-Federal cost of $3,000,000. 
(6) PAWLEY’S ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA.—The 
project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
Pawley’s Island, South Carolina, at a total cost of
HR 2864 PCS 
$8,813,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$4,133,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$4,680,000. 
SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUC-
TION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 
study for each of the following projects and, if the Sec-
retary determines that a project is feasible, may carry out 
the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): 
(1) HALEYVILLE, ALABAMA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Haleyville, Alabama. 
(2) WEISS LAKE, ALABAMA.—Project for flood 
damage reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama. 
(3) CHINO
VALLEY
WASH, ARIZONA.—Project 
for flood damage reduction, Chino Valley Wash, Ari-
zona. 
(4) LITTLE
COLORADO
RIVER
LEVEE, ARI-
ZONA.—Project for flood damage reduction, Little 
Colorado River Levee, Arizona. 
(5) CACHE RIVER BASIN, GRUBBS, ARKANSAS.— 
Project for flood damage reduction, Cache River 
Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.