datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4072
To prohibit the transfer of F–16 aircraft to the Government of the United
Arab Emirates.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on International Relations
A BILL
To prohibit the transfer of F–16 aircraft to the Government
of the United Arab Emirates.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dubai Investments/
United Arab Emirates (UAE) Debt Repayment Act of
2000’’.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF F–16 AIRCRAFT TO
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ARAB
EMIRATES.
(a) GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT TRANSFER.—F–
16 aircraft may not be transferred by the United States
Government to the Government of the United Arab Emir-
ates unless the President first makes the certification de-
scribed in subsection (c).
(b) COMMERCIAL EXPORT.—An application for a li-
cense to export F–16 aircraft under section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) to the Govern-
ment of the United Arab Emirates may not be approved
unless the President first makes the certification described
in subsection (c).
(c) CERTIFICATION.—The certification described in
this subsection is a certification to the Congress that
Dubai Investments (a United Arab Emirates corporation)
has provided adequate compensation to Pascoe Building
Systems (a United States corporation), or to its share-
holders, in accordance with the 1996 agreement between
Dubai Investments and Pascoe Building Systems.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4073
To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to include pigeons that are
distributed in commerce for use as human food.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. CONDIT (for himself, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mrs.
CLAYTON, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CLYBURN, and Mr. THOMP-
SON of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture
A BILL
To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to include
pigeons that are distributed in commerce for use as
human food.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF POULTRY TO
INCLUDE PIGEONS DISTRIBUTED IN COM-
MERCE FOR USE AS HUMAN FOOD.
(a) DEFINITION OF POULTRY.—Section 4(e) of the
Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 453(e)) is
amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The term
includes pigeons that are distributed in commerce as
human food.’’.
(b) PROHIBITION ON EXEMPTION FOR SMALL EN-
TERPRISES.—Section 15(c) of the Poultry Products In-
spection Act (21 U.S.C. 464(c)) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
‘‘(5) No exemption under subparagraph (1) (C) or
(D) or subparagraph (2) shall apply with respect to the
slaughter or processing of pigeons.’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall take effect on the first day of the first
fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
Æ
‘‘(D) a description of how the applicant
will ensure sustained and intensive, high-quality
professional development for teachers, adminis-
trators, and other educational personnel to fur-
ther the effective use of technology in the class-
room;
‘‘(E) a description of the administrative
and technical support that the applicant will
provide schools;
‘‘(F) the projected timetable for imple-
menting such plan in schools;
‘‘(G) the projected cost of technologies to
be acquired and related expenses needed to im-
plement such plan; and
‘‘(H) a description of the applicant’s strat-
egy for financing its strategic, long-term local
technology plan, including the use of other Fed-
eral and non-Federal funds;
‘‘(I) a description of how the applicant will
use advanced technology to promote commu-
nication between teachers for activities such
as—
‘‘(i) sharing examples of student
work;
amounts distributed on account of the death of
a beneficiary.
‘‘(C) AMOUNTS INCLUDIBLE IN ESTATE OF
DONOR
MAKING
EXCESS
CONTRIBUTIONS.—In
the case of a donor who makes the election de-
scribed in paragraph (2)(B) and who dies be-
fore the close of the 5-year period referred to
in such paragraph, notwithstanding subpara-
graph (A), the gross estate of the donor shall
include the portion of such contributions prop-
erly allocable to periods after the date of death
of the donor.
‘‘(5) OTHER GIFT TAX RULES.—For purposes
of chapters 12 and 13, in no event shall a distribu-
tion from a qualified developmental disabilities en-
dowment program be treated as a taxable gift.
‘‘(d) REPORTS.—Each officer or employee having
control of the qualified developmental disabilities endow-
ment program or their designee shall make such reports
regarding such program to the Secretary and to des-
ignated beneficiaries with respect to contributions, dis-
tributions, and such other matters as the Secretary may
require. The reports required by this subsection shall be
filed at such time and in such manner and furnished to
such individuals at such time and in such manner as may
be required by the Secretary.
‘‘(e) OTHER DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.—
For purposes of this section—
‘‘(1) DESIGNATED
BENEFICIARY.—The term
‘designated beneficiary’ means—
‘‘(A) the individual designated at the com-
mencement of participation in the qualified
State developmental disabilities endowment pro-
gram as the beneficiary of amounts paid (or to
be paid) to the program,
‘‘(B) in the case of a change in bene-
ficiaries described in subsection (c)(3)(C), the
individual who is the new beneficiary, and
‘‘(C) any individual not described in sub-
paragraph (A) or (B) who is designated as a
beneficiary under the qualified developmental
disabilities endowment program.
‘‘(2) QUALIFIED SERVICES.—The term ‘quali-
fied services’ means the services designated under
the qualified developmental disabilities endowment
program.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for
subchapter F of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by
adding after the item relating to part VIII the following
new item:
‘‘Part IX. State developmental disabilities trust funds.’’.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2000.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4075
To require each State to provide a minimum level of access to health care
to all citizens of such State as a condition for participation in Federal
health care funding programs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. FATTAH (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. CARSON, and Mr.
OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and
Means, and Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To require each State to provide a minimum level of access
to health care to all citizens of such State as a condition
for participation in Federal health care funding pro-
grams.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the
‘‘Health Care Access Assurance Act of 2000’’.
(b) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:
(1) Access to health care is a basic right pro-
tected by the Constitution of the United States.
(2) Each State should determine the minimum
level of health services to be provided within such
State.
(3) Any health care system operated by a State
that does not provide access to health care to all citi-
zens of such state is in violation of the fourteenth
amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
(4) Federal funds may not be employed to sup-
port State health care systems that are unconstitu-
tional.
SEC. 2. MINIMUM ACCESS REQUIREMENT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than October 1, 2005,
the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require
each State to certify that all citizens of such State have
access to a minimum level of health care coverage as de-
fined by such State. The Secretary may remove or recon-
sider a State’s certification for cause.
(b) PENALTY.—Any State unable to certify that all
citizens of such State have access to a minimum level of
health care coverage shall be ineligible for funding from
the Health Resources and Services Administration, the In-
dian Health Service Administration, the Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services, and the Health Care Financ-
less. These laws are premised on the belief—inappli-
cable to DNA testing—that evidence becomes less
reliable over time. Such time limits have been used
to deny inmates access to DNA testing, even when
guilt or innocence could be conclusively established
by such testing. For example, in Dedge v. Florida,
723 So.2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998), the court
without opinion affirmed the denial of a motion to
release trial evidence for the purpose of DNA test-
ing. The trial court denied the motion as proce-
durally barred under the 2-year limitation on claims
of newly discovered evidence established by the State
of Florida, which has since adopted a 6-month limi-
tation on such claims.
(9) Even when DNA testing has been done and
has persuasively demonstrated the actual innocence
of an inmate, States have sometimes relied on time
limits and other procedural barriers to deny release.
(10) The National Commission on the Future
of DNA Evidence, a Federal panel established by
the Department of Justice and comprised of law en-
forcement, judicial, and scientific experts, has issued
a report entitled ‘‘Recommendations For Handling
Post-Conviction DNA Applications’’ that urges post-
conviction DNA testing in 2 carefully defined cat-
ing Administration, to support the health care system in
such State.
Æ
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4076
To provide for the effective punishment of online child molesters.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma) intro-
duced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
A BILL
To provide for the effective punishment of online child
molesters.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cybermolesters En-
forcement Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES.
Section 2423 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘not less
than 5 and’’ before ‘‘not more than 15’’; and
(2) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘not less
than 5 and’’ before ‘‘not more than 15’’.
Æ
I
#
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4077
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend the benefit period for trade
adjustment assistance for those adversely affected workers enrolled in
training programs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. RILEY, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BURR
of North Carolina, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr.
MCGOVERN, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Ms. DANNER, Mr. STRICK-
LAND, Mr. WU, Mr. NEY, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. EVANS, and Mr.
ENGLISH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend the benefit
period for trade adjustment assistance for those ad-
versely affected workers enrolled in training programs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
HR 4077 IH1S
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF BENEFIT PERIOD FOR TRADE
READJUSTMENT 
ALLOWANCES 
FOR 
AD-
VERSELY AFFECTED WORKERS ENROLLED IN
TRAINING PROGRAMS.
Section 233(a)(3) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19
U.S.C. 2293(a)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘26’’ each
place it appears and inserting ‘‘52’’.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendments made by section 1 apply to any
worker covered by a certification of eligibility issued under
subchapter A or D of chapter 2 of title II of the Trade
Act of 1974—
(1) if the certification is issued on or after the
date of the enactment of this Act; or
(2) if the certification is issued before such date
of enactment and the trade readjustment allowances
payable with respect to the period covered by the
certification to that worker have not exceeded the
maximum allowable under section 233 of the Trade
Act of 1974 on the day before such date of enact-
ment.
Æ
under subsection (b) with respect to credit allowance dates
during such year on which the taxpayer holds such bond.
‘‘(b) AMOUNT OF CREDIT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the credit
determined under this subsection with respect to any
credit allowance date for a qualified public school
modernization bond is 25 percent of the annual
credit determined with respect to such bond.
‘‘(2) ANNUAL CREDIT.—The annual credit de-
termined with respect to any qualified public school
modernization bond is the product of—
‘‘(A) the applicable credit rate, multiplied
by
‘‘(B) the outstanding face amount of the
bond.
‘‘(3) APPLICABLE CREDIT RATE.—For purposes
of paragraph (1), the applicable credit rate with re-
spect to an issue is the rate equal to an average
market yield (as of the day before the date of
issuance of the issue) on outstanding long-term cor-
porate debt obligations (determined under regula-
tions prescribed by the Secretary).
‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR ISSUANCE AND RE-
DEMPTION.—In the case of a bond which is issued
during the 3-month period ending on a credit allow-
SEC. 405. DISCRETIONARY APPELLATE REVIEW.
Section 2254(c) of title 28, United States Code, is
amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), if the highest
court of a State has discretion to decline appellate review
of a case or a claim, a petition asking that court to enter-
tain a case or a claim is not an available State court proce-
dure.’’.
Æ
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
AN ACT
To require the Comptroller General of the United
States to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of
the Department of Education.
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
AN ACT
To require the Comptroller General of the United States
to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of the Depart-
ment of Education.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That within 6 months after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall—
(1) conduct and complete a fraud audit of se-
lected accounts at the Department of Education that
the Comptroller General determines to be particu-
larly susceptible to waste, fraud, and abuse; and
(2) submit a report setting forth the results of
the audit to the Committee on Education and the
Workforce of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pen-
sions of the Senate.
Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2000.
Attest:
Clerk.
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a
comprehensive fraud audit of the Department of Education.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. KASICH, Mr.
NUSSLE, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr.
TANCREDO, Mr. EWING, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. COBURN, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr.
HERGER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. SHAYS,
Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HAYES, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of
Texas, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. JONES of North Carolina,
Mr. BRYANT, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. PITTS, Mr. UPTON, Mr. HUTCHINSON,
Mr. WAMP, Mr. CAMP, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin,
Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. WELLER, Mr. ROHR-
ABACHER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. DELAY, and Mr. COLLINS) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the
Workforce
A BILL
To require the Comptroller General of the United States
to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of the Depart-
ment of Education.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE FRAUD AUDIT OF DEPART-
MENT OF EDUCATION.
Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall conduct and complete a comprehensive fraud audit
of the Department of Education and submit a report set-
ting forth the results of the audit to the Committee on
Education and the Workforce of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
Pensions of the Senate.
Æ
II
Calendar No. 778
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 14, 2000
Received
JULY 27, 2000
Read the first time
SEPTEMBER 5, 2000
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
AN ACT
To require the Comptroller General of the United States
to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of the Depart-
ment of Education.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That within 6 months after the date of the enactment of
HR 4079 PCS
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall—
(1) conduct and complete a fraud audit of se-
lected accounts at the Department of Education that
the Comptroller General determines to be particu-
larly susceptible to waste, fraud, and abuse; and
(2) submit a report setting forth the results of
the audit to the Committee on Education and the
Workforce of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pen-
sions of the Senate.
Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2000.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL
Clerk.
Calendar No. 778
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
AN ACT
To require the Comptroller General of the United
States to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of
the Department of Education.
SEPTEMBER 5, 2000
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
IB
Union Calendar No. 372
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4079
[Report No. 106–666]
To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a
comprehensive fraud audit of the Department of Education.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. KASICH, Mr.
NUSSLE, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr.
TANCREDO, Mr. EWING, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. COBURN, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr.
HERGER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. SHAYS,
Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HAYES, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of
Texas, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. JONES of North Carolina,
Mr. BRYANT, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. PITTS, Mr. UPTON, Mr. HUTCHINSON,
Mr. WAMP, Mr. CAMP, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin,
Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. WELLER, Mr. ROHR-
ABACHER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. DELAY, and Mr. COLLINS) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the
Workforce
JUNE 12, 2000
Additional sponsors: Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. SALMON, Mr. POMBO, Mr. RYUN
of Kansas, Mr. COOK, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HEFLEY, Mrs. BIGGERT, and Mr.
ROYCE
JUNE 12, 2000
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To require the Comptroller General of the United States
to conduct a comprehensive fraud audit of the Depart-
ment of Education.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE FRAUD AUDIT OF DEPART-
MENT OF EDUCATION.
Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall conduct and complete a comprehensive fraud audit
of the Department of Education and submit a report set-
ting forth the results of the audit to the Committee on
Education and the Workforce of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
Pensions of the Senate.
SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE FRAUD AUDIT OF DEPART-
MENT OF EDUCATION.
(a) AUDIT.—Within 6 months after the date of the en-
actment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
States shall—
(1) conduct and complete a fraud audit of se-
lected accounts at the Department of Education that
the Comptroller General determines to be particularly
susceptible to waste, fraud, and abuse; and
(2) submit a report setting forth the results of the
audit to the Committee on Education and the Work-
force of the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions of
the Senate.
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4082
To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Federal Home Loan
Bank Act to provide for the payment of Financing Corporation interest
obligations from balances in the deposit insurance funds in excess of
an established ratio and, after such obligations are satisfied, to provide
for rebates to insured depository institutions of such excess reserves.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma (for himself, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr. BE-
REUTER, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. JONES of North Carolina,
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr.
COBLE, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, Mr. BALLENGER,
Mr. HAYES, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. TERRY,
Mr. RYUN of Kansas, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial
Services
A BILL
To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Fed-
eral Home Loan Bank Act to provide for the payment
of Financing Corporation interest obligations from bal-
ances in the deposit insurance funds in excess of an
established ratio and, after such obligations are satisfied,
to provide for rebates to insured depository institutions
of such excess reserves.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
I
106TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 4083
To ensure that schools implement adequate safeguards before distributing
certain prescribed medications to students.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 23, 2000
Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce
A BILL
To ensure that schools implement adequate safeguards before
distributing certain prescribed medications to students.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public School Prescrip-
tion Safety Act of 2000’’.
SEC. 2. SAFE AND DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMU-
NITIES.
Section 4112(b) of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools
and Communities Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 7112(b)) is
amended—
the allocation was in accordance with the plan ap-
proved under this paragraph.
‘‘(e) 40 PERCENT
OF
LIMITATION
ALLOCATED
AMONG LARGEST SCHOOL DISTRICTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—40 percent of the limitation
applicable under subsection (c) for any calendar year
shall be allocated under paragraph (2) by the Sec-
retary among local educational agencies which are
large local educational agencies for such year. No
qualified school construction bond may be issued by
reason of an allocation to a large local educational
agency under the preceding sentence unless such
agency has an approved local application.
‘‘(2) ALLOCATION FORMULA.—The amount to
be allocated under paragraph (1) for any calendar
year shall be allocated among large local educational
agencies in proportion to the respective amounts
each such agency received for Basic Grants under
subpart 2 of part A of title I of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331
et seq.) for the most recent fiscal year ending before
such calendar year.
‘‘(3) ALLOCATION OF UNUSED LIMITATION TO
STATE.—The amount allocated under this subsection
to a large local educational agency for any calendar