datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
IIB 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2781 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
NOVEMBER 20, 2009 
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources 
AN ACT 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 
segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components 
of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 
for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:35 Nov 21, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2781.RFS
H2781
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
HR 2781 RFS 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 
SEGMENTS. 
Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(lll) MOLALLA RIVER, OREGON.—The fol-
lowing segments in the State of Oregon, to be adminis-
tered by the Secretary of the Interior as a recreational 
river: 
‘‘(A) MOLALLA
RIVER.—The approximately 
15.1 miles from the southern boundary line of sec-
tion 19, Township 7 south, Range 4 east down-
stream to the edge of the Bureau of Land Manage-
ment boundary in section 7, Township 6 south, 
Range 3 east. 
‘‘(B) TABLE
ROCK
FORK
MOLALLA
RIVER.— 
The approximately 6.2 miles from the easternmost 
Bureau of Land Management boundary line in the 
northeast quarter of section 4, Township 7 south, 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:35 Nov 21, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2781.RFS
H2781
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
HR 2781 RFS 
Range 4 east downstream to the confluence 
with the Molalla River.’’. 
Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 
2009. 
Attest: 
LORRAINE C. MILLER, 
Clerk. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:35 Nov 21, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2781.RFS
H2781
rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IB 
Union Calendar No. 194 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2781 
[Report No. 111–336] 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 
Molalla River in Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic 
Rivers System, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 9, 2009 
Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
NOVEMBER 16, 2009 
Additional sponsors: Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. WU, and Mr. DEFAZIO 
NOVEMBER 16, 2009 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 9, 2009] 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:11 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2781.RH
H2781
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
A BILL 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 
segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components 
of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 
for other purposes. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:11 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\H2781.RH
H2781
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 
SEGMENTS. 
Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(lll) MOLALLA RIVER, OREGON.—The following 
segments in the State of Oregon, to be administered by the 
Secretary of the Interior as a recreational river: 
‘‘(A) MOLALLA RIVER.—The approximately 15.1 
miles from the southern boundary line of section 19, 
Township 7 south, Range 4 east downstream to the 
edge of the Bureau of Land Management boundary in 
section 7, Township 6 south, Range 3 east. 
‘‘(B) TABLE ROCK FORK MOLALLA RIVER.—The 
approximately 6.2 miles from the easternmost Bureau 
of Land Management boundary line in the northeast 
quarter of section 4, Township 7 south, Range 4 east 
downstream to the confluence with the Molalla 
River.’’. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:11 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\H2781.RH
H2781
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 194 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 2781 
[Report No. 111–336] 
A BILL 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to des-
ignate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, 
as components of the National Wild and Scenic 
Rivers System, and for other purposes. 
NOVEMBER 16, 2009 
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Com-
mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 
and ordered to be printed 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
21:11 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\H2781.RH
H2781
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in each of paragraphs (1) through (6), 
by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe-
riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(8)(A) providing material support or resources 
to a foreign terrorist organization; 
‘‘(B) engaging in, or purposefully and materi-
ally supporting, hostilities against the United States; 
or 
‘‘(C) engaging in, or purposefully and materi-
ally supporting, hostilities against any country or 
armed force that is— 
‘‘(i) directly engaged along with the United 
States in hostilities engaged in by the United 
States; or 
‘‘(ii) providing direct operational support 
to the United States in hostilities engaged in by 
the United States.’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(c) For purposes of this section— 
‘‘(1) the term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ 
means an organization so designated by the Sec-
retary pursuant to section 219(a); 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
01:37 May 07, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5237.IH
H5237
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
tives from the State, private business, transpor-
tation service providers, economic development 
practitioners, and the public in the region; and 
‘‘(B) a fiscal and administrative agent, 
such as an existing regional planning and devel-
opment organization, to provide professional 
planning, management, and administrative sup-
port. 
‘‘(6) DUTIES.—The duties of a regional trans-
portation planning organization shall include— 
‘‘(A) ensuring nonmetropolitan local offi-
cials are meaningfully involved in the statewide 
transportation planning process; 
‘‘(B) developing and maintaining, in co-
operation with the State, regional long-range 
multimodal transportation plans; 
‘‘(C) developing a regional transportation 
improvement program for consideration by the 
State; 
‘‘(D) fostering the coordination of local 
planning, land use, and economic development 
plans with State, regional, and local transpor-
tation plans and programs; 
‘‘(E) providing technical assistance to local 
officials; 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
06:08 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2782.IH
H2782
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
‘‘(F) participating in national, multistate, 
and State policy and planning development 
processes to ensure the regional and local input 
of nonmetropolitan areas; 
‘‘(G) providing a forum for public partici-
pation in the statewide and regional transpor-
tation planning processes; 
‘‘(H) considering and sharing plans and 
programs with neighboring regional transpor-
tation planning organizations, metropolitan 
planning organizations, and, where appropriate, 
tribal organizations; and 
‘‘(I) conducting other duties, as necessary, 
to support and enhance the statewide planning 
process under subsection (d).’’. 
Æ 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
06:08 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2782.IH
H2782
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
109 
‘‘(1) Any corporation which is subject to section 
316(a), other than a corporation which is an organi-
zation described in paragraph (3) of section 501(c) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt 
from tax under section 501(a) of such Code. 
‘‘(2) Any labor organization (as defined in sec-
tion 316). 
‘‘(3) Any organization described in paragraph 
(4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under sec-
tion 501(a) of such Code, other than an exempt sec-
tion 501(c)(4) organization (as defined in section 
301(27)). 
‘‘(4) Any political organization under section 
527 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, other 
than a political committee under this Act.’’. 
TITLE IV—OTHER PROVISIONS 
SEC. 401. JUDICIAL REVIEW. 
(a) SPECIAL RULES
FOR ACTIONS BROUGHT
ON 
CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS.—If any action is brought for 
declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge the constitu-
tionality of any provision of this Act or any amendment 
made by this Act, the following rules shall apply: 
(1) The action shall be filed in the United 
States District Court for the District of Columbia,
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT STATES IMPOSE 
MANDATORY FEE FOR SUCCESSFUL CHILD 
SUPPORT COLLECTION FOR FAMILY THAT 
HAS NEVER RECEIVED TANF. 
Section 454(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 654(6)(B)) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(i)’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (i); 
(3) by striking clause (ii); and 
(4) by redesignating subclauses (I) and (II) of 
clause (i) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively. 
Æ 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
06:09 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2783.IH
H2783
jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
ed under such subsection may not exceed a period of 10 
years. 
(c) APPLICATION.—Each State desiring a grant 
under subsection (a) shall submit to the Attorney General 
an application at such time, in such manner, and con-
taining such information as the Attorney General may re-
quire. 
(d) REPORT.—Each State receiving a grant under 
subsection (a) shall submit to the Attorney General a re-
port evaluating the effectiveness of activities funded with 
grants awarded under such subsection at such time and 
in such manner as the Attorney General may require. 
(e) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Attorney General 
shall provide technical assistance to the States awarded 
grants under subsection (a). Such technical assistance 
shall include the development, in consultation with States, 
of common definitions, formats, and data collection infra-
structure for States receiving grants under this section to 
use in reporting to facilitate aggregation and analysis of 
data within and between States. The technical assistance 
shall also include guidance about identification and selec-
tion of health care tribunal judges and independent expert 
witnesses, compensation of injured patients, and clinical 
resources relating to the standard of care. States not re-
ceiving grants under this section may also use such com-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:21 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2787.IH
H2787
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
mentation to dispute a carrier’s charges of overpayment 
without waiving the physician’s right to a hearing by an 
administrative law judge. 
(f) LIMITATION ON DELAY IN PAYMENT.—Following 
a post-payment audit, a carrier that is conducting a pre- 
payment screen on a physician service under the Medicare 
program may not delay reimbursements for more than one 
month and as soon as the physician submits a corrected 
claim, the carrier shall eliminate application of such a pre- 
payment screen. 
Æ 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:18 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2785.IH
H2785
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
145 
HR 5116 EAS 
compete economically with the United 
States. 
(iv) Regional issues that influence the 
economic competitiveness and innovation 
capacity of the United States, including— 
(I) the roles of State and local 
governments and institutions of higher 
education; and 
(II) regional factors that con-
tribute positively to innovation. 
(v) The effectiveness of the Federal 
Government in supporting and promoting 
economic competitiveness and innovation, 
including any duplicative efforts of, or gaps 
in coverage between, Federal agencies and 
departments. 
(vi) Barriers to competitiveness in 
newly emerging business or technology sec-
tors, factors influencing underperforming 
economic sectors, unique issues facing small 
and medium enterprises, and barriers to the 
development and evolution of start-ups, 
firms, and industries. 
(vii) The effects of domestic and inter-
national trade policy on the competitiveness
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Distinguished Flying 
Cross National Memorial Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS 
NATIONAL MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALI-
FORNIA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The most reliable statistics regarding the 
number of members of the Armed Forces who have 
been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross indi-
cate that 126,318 members of the Armed Forces re-
ceived the medal during World War II, approxi-
mately 21,000 members received the medal during 
the Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received 
the medal during the Vietnam War. Since the end 
of the Vietnam War, more than 203 Armed Forces 
members have received the medal in times of con-
flict. 
(2) The National Personnel Records Center in 
St. Louis, Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus 
many more recipients of the Distinguished Flying 
Cross may be undocumented. Currently, the Depart-
ment of Defense continues to locate and identify 
members of the Armed Forces who have received the 
medal and are undocumented.
(3) The United States currently lacks a na-
tional memorial dedicated to the bravery and sac-
rifice of those members of the Armed Forces who 
have distinguished themselves by heroic deeds per-
formed in aerial flight. 
(4) An appropriate memorial to current and 
former members of the Armed Forces is under con-
struction at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, 
California. 
(5) This memorial will honor all those members 
of the Armed Forces who have distinguished them-
selves in aerial flight, whether documentation of 
such members who earned the Distinguished Flying 
Cross exists or not. 
(b) DESIGNATION.—The memorial to members of the 
Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished 
Flying Cross that is under construction at March Field 
Air Museum in Riverside, California, is hereby designated 
as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial. 
(c) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memo-
rial designated by this section is not a unit of the National 
Park System, and the designation of the national memo-
rial shall not be construed to require or permit Federal
funds to be expended for any purpose related to the na-
tional memorial. 
Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 
2010. 
Attest: 
Clerk.
111TH CONGRESS 
2D SESSION 
H. R. 2788 
AN ACT 
To designate a Distinguished Flying Cross National 
Memorial at the March Field Air Museum in 
Riverside, California.
I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2788 
To designate a Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial at the March 
Field Air Museum in Riverside, California. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 10, 2009 
Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources 
A BILL 
To designate a Distinguished Flying Cross National Memo-
rial at the March Field Air Museum in Riverside, Cali-
fornia. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Distinguished Flying 
Cross National Memorial Act’’. 
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS 
NATIONAL MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALI-
FORNIA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:18 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2788.IH
H2788
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
(1) The most reliable statistics regarding the 
number of members of the Armed Forces who have 
been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross indi-
cate that 126,318 members of the Armed Forces re-
ceived the medal during World War II, approxi-
mately 21,000 members received the medal during 
the Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received 
the medal during the Vietnam War. Since the end 
of the Vietnam War, more than 203 Armed Forces 
members have received the medal in times of con-
flict. 
(2) The National Personnel Records Center in 
St. Louis, Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus 
many more recipients of the Distinguished Flying 
Cross may be undocumented. Currently, the Depart-
ment of Defense continues to locate and identify 
members of the Armed Forces who have received the 
medal and are undocumented. 
(3) The United States currently lacks a na-
tional memorial dedicated to the bravery and sac-
rifice of those members of the Armed Forces who 
have distinguished themselves by heroic deeds per-
formed in aerial flight. 
(4) An appropriate memorial to current and 
former members of the Armed Forces is under con-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:18 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2788.IH
H2788
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2789 
To confer certain Federal jurisdiction on the High Court of American Samoa, 
and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE 10, 2009 
Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To confer certain Federal jurisdiction on the High Court 
of American Samoa, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 
The Congress finds the following: 
(1) The political relationship between the 
United States Territory of American Samoa and the 
United States is embodied in two separate treaties 
of cessions: one that was signed on April 17, 1900, 
between the traditional leaders of the Islands of 
Tutuila and Aunu’u and the United States; and an-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:18 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2789.IH
H2789
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
other that was signed on July 16, 1904, between the 
traditional leaders of Manu’a and the United States. 
(2) The Act of February 20, 1929 (48 U.S.C. 
1661), whereby Congress officially ratified the two 
treaties of cessions, stipulates, in subsection (c), that 
‘‘Until Congress shall provide for the government of 
such islands, all civil, judicial, and military powers 
shall be vested in such person or persons and shall 
be exercised in such manner as the President of the 
United States shall direct; and the President shall 
have power to remove said officers and fill the va-
cancies so occasioned.’’ On June 29, 1951, by Exec-
utive Order No. 10264, President Harry S. Truman 
transferred the administration of American Samoa 
from the Secretary of the Navy to the Secretary of 
the Interior. 
(3) In accordance with article IV, section 3, 
clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and pur-
suant to subsection (c) of the Act of February 20, 
1929 (48 U.S.C. 1661(c)), Congress hereby author-
izes additional jurisdiction to be exercised by the 
High Court of American Samoa under this Act. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
03:18 Jun 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2789.IH
H2789
bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
made for the purpose of making an elec-
tioneering communication by that person 
or by any other person. 
‘‘(B) RULE
FOR
DEEMING
TRANSFERS 
MADE
FOR
PURPOSE
OF
CAMPAIGN-RELATED 
ACTIVITY.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), 
in determining whether a transfer of funds by 
one person to another person shall be deemed 
to have been made for the purpose of making 
an independent expenditure consisting of a pub-
lic communication or an electioneering commu-
nication, the following rules apply: 
‘‘(i) The transfer shall be deemed to 
have been made for the purpose of making 
such an independent expenditure or an 
electioneering communication if— 
‘‘(I) the person making the inde-
pendent expenditure or electioneering 
communication or another person act-
ing on that person’s behalf solicited 
funding from the person or from the 
person to whom the amounts were 
transferred for the purpose of making 
any such independent expenditures or 
electioneering communications, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
00:40 Apr 30, 2010
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5175.IH
H5175
jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 278 
To ensure that Congress is notified when the Department of Justice 
determines that the Executive Branch is not bound by a statute. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
JANUARY 7, 2009 
Mr. MILLER of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 
A BILL 
To ensure that Congress is notified when the Department 
of Justice determines that the Executive Branch is not 
bound by a statute. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OLC Reporting Act 
of 2009’’. 
SEC. 2. REPORTING. 
Section 530D of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
18:38 Jan 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H278.IH
H278
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
(i) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(ii) by redesignating subparagraph 
(C) as subparagraph (D); and 
(iii) by inserting after subparagraph 
(B) the following: 
‘‘(C) except as provided in paragraph (3), 
issues an authoritative legal interpretation (in-
cluding an interpretation under section 511, 
512, or 513 by the Attorney General or by an 
officer, employee, or agency of the Department 
of Justice pursuant to a delegation of authority 
under section 510) of any provision of any Fed-
eral statute— 
‘‘(i) that concludes that the provision 
is unconstitutional or would be unconstitu-
tional in a particular application; 
‘‘(ii) that relies for the conclusion of 
the authoritative legal interpretation, in 
whole or in the alternative, on a deter-
mination that an interpretation of the pro-
vision other than the authoritative legal in-
terpretation would raise constitutional con-
cerns under article II of the Constitution 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
18:38 Jan 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H278.IH
H278
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
of the United States or separation of pow-
ers principles; 
‘‘(iii) that relies for the conclusion of 
the authoritative legal interpretation, in 
whole or in the alternative, on a legal pre-
sumption against applying the provision, 
whether during a war or otherwise, to— 
‘‘(I) any department or agency 
established in the executive branch of 
the Federal Government, including 
the Executive Office of the President 
and the military departments (as de-
fined in section 101(8) of title 10); or 
‘‘(II) any officer, employee, or 
member of any department or agency 
established in the executive branch of 
the Federal Government, including 
the President and any member of the 
Armed Forces; or 
‘‘(iv) that concludes the provision has 
been superseded or deprived of effect in 
whole or in part by a subsequently enacted 
statute where there is no express statutory 
language stating an intent to supersede the 
prior provision or deprive it of effect; or’’; 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
18:38 Jan 11, 2009
Jkt 079200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H278.IH
H278
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS