datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
HR 4519 RFS 
State to carry out this subsection to reduce pre-
miums for enrollees. 
‘‘(4) LIMITATION
FOR
TERRITORIES.—In no 
case shall the aggregate amount allotted and made 
available under paragraph (2) for a fiscal year to 
States that are not the 50 States or the District of 
Columbia exceed $1,000,000. 
‘‘(c) BONUS GRANTS
FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CON-
SUMER BENEFITS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a State that 
is one of the 50 States or the District of Columbia, 
that has established a qualified high risk pool, and 
that is receiving a grant under subsection (b)(1), the 
Secretary shall provide, from the funds appropriated 
under paragraphs (1)(B)(ii) and (2)(B) of sub-
section (d) and allotted to the State under para-
graph (3), a grant to be used to provide supple-
mental consumer benefits to enrollees or potential 
enrollees (or defined subsets of such enrollees or po-
tential enrollees) in qualified high risk pools. 
‘‘(2) BENEFITS.—A State shall use amounts re-
ceived under a grant under this subsection to pro-
vide one or more of the following benefits: 
‘‘(A) Low-income premium subsidies.
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3943 
To postpone the enforcement of new rules governing rest periods for truck 
drivers using sleeper berths until January 1, 2006. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 
Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. PETRI, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SESSIONS, 
Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. BUYER, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. SIMP-
SON, Mr. SODREL, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. WILSON of South Caro-
lina, Mr. MARCHANT, and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure 
A BILL 
To postpone the enforcement of new rules governing rest 
periods for truck drivers using sleeper berths until Janu-
ary 1, 2006. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 
Congress finds the following: 
(1) On August 25, 2005, the Federal Motor 
Carrier Safety Administration published a new rule 
governing rest periods for truck drivers using sleeper 
berths.
(2) The rule imposes significant new restric-
tions on sleeper berth operations, necessitating the 
retraining of truck drivers and the adjustment of 
shipment pick-up and delivery schedules. 
(3) The trucking industry will not be able to re-
train all drivers and adjust shipping schedules until 
the end of calendar year 2005. However, the rule is 
scheduled to become effective and fully enforceable 
by State officials on October 1, 2005. 
(4) The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-
tration cannot establish an enforcement date for the 
rule that is later than the effective date because 
Federal legislation passed in 2004 requires that the 
new rule be made effective no later than October 1, 
2005. 
(5) It would be unwise and irresponsible to sub-
ject truck drivers and motor carriers to fines, cita-
tions, and out-of-service violations because they have 
not been given adequate time to understand and 
comply with the new sleeper berth rule. 
(6) Although the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration has issued ‘‘soft enforcement’’ guid-
ance, State enforcement officials are not bound by 
this guidance and beginning October 1, 2005, will 
still have the authority to fully enforce the new rule.
(7) Congress should allow the rule to become 
effective on October 1, 2005, but postpone the en-
forcement date to January 1, 2006, to provide a rea-
sonable amount of time to achieve compliance with 
the new sleeper berth rule. 
SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT DATE FOR NEW HOURS OF SERVICE 
RULE. 
The provisions of section 395.1(g)(1) of title 49, Code 
of Federal Regulations, contained in the final rule pub-
lished by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 
on August 25, 2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 50071–50072; relating 
to property-carrying commercial motor vehicles equipped 
with sleeper berths) shall become enforceable on January 
1, 2006, and until such date the provisions of section 
395.1(g)(1) of that title, as in effect as of January 4, 
2004, and any compatible State law, shall remain in effect 
and enforceable. 
Æ
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2005. 
Æ
HR 4519 RFS 
‘‘(B) A reduction in premium trends, ac-
tual premiums, or other cost-sharing require-
ments. 
‘‘(C) An expansion or broadening of the 
pool of individuals eligible for coverage, such as 
through eliminating waiting lists, increasing en-
rollment caps, or providing flexibility in enroll-
ment rules. 
‘‘(D) Less stringent rules, or additional 
waiver authority, with respect to coverage of 
pre-existing conditions. 
‘‘(E) Increased benefits. 
‘‘(F) The establishment of disease manage-
ment programs. 
‘‘(3) ALLOTMENT; LIMITATION.—The Secretary 
shall allot funds appropriated under paragraphs 
(1)(B)(ii) and (2)(B) of subsection (d) among States 
qualifying for a grant under paragraph (1) in a 
manner specified by the Secretary, but in no case 
shall the amount so allotted to a State for a fiscal 
year exceed 10 percent of the funds so appropriated 
for the fiscal year. 
‘‘(4) RULE
OF
CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 
this subsection shall be construed to prohibit a State 
that, on the date of the enactment of the State High
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), (5), 
(6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), and (13) as para-
graphs (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (12), (13), 
(14), and (15), respectively; 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(3) DEFICIENT
DAM.—The term ‘deficient 
dam’ means a dam that the State within the bound-
aries of which the dam is located determines— 
‘‘(A) fails to meet minimum dam safety 
standards of the State; and 
‘‘(B) poses an unacceptable risk to the 
public.’’; and 
(3) by inserting after paragraph (10) (as redes-
ignated by paragraph (1)) the following: 
‘‘(11) REHABILITATION.—The term ‘rehabilita-
tion’ means the repair, replacement, reconstruction, 
or removal of a dam that is carried out to meet ap-
plicable State dam safety and security standards.’’. 
(b) PROGRAM FOR REHABILITATION AND REPAIR OF 
DEFICIENT DAMS.—The National Dam Safety Program 
Act is amended by inserting after section 8 (33 U.S.C. 
467f) the following: 
VerDate Aug 31 2005 
03:05 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3224.IH
H3224
hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
I 
111TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2356 
To amend section 1119 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 to require each State educational agency receiving assistance 
under part A of title I of such Act to consider a teacher highly qualified 
if the teacher is (or was) highly qualified in at least 1 other State 
and has at least 5 years of teaching experience. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
MAY 12, 2009 
Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Education and Labor 
A BILL 
To amend section 1119 of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 to require each State educational 
agency receiving assistance under part A of title I of 
such Act to consider a teacher highly qualified if the 
teacher is (or was) highly qualified in at least 1 other 
State and has at least 5 years of teaching experience. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Educators Achieving 
Reciprocity Now (E.A.R.N.) Act’’. 
VerDate Nov 24 2008 
22:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 059200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2356.IH
H2356
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
1474 
† HR 4173 EAS 
‘‘(1) the term ‘designated recipient’ means any 
person located in a foreign country and identified by 
the sender as the authorized recipient of a remittance 
transfer to be made by a remittance transfer provider, 
except that a designated recipient shall not be deemed 
to be a consumer for purposes of this Act; 
‘‘(2) the term ‘remittance transfer’ means the 
electronic (as defined in section 106(2) of the Elec-
tronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce 
Act (15 U.S.C. 7006(2))) transfer of funds requested 
by a sender located in any State to a designated re-
cipient that is initiated by a remittance transfer pro-
vider, whether or not the sender holds an account 
with the remittance transfer provider or whether or 
not the remittance transfer is also an electronic fund 
transfer, as defined in section 903; 
‘‘(3) the term ‘remittance transfer provider’ 
means any person or financial institution that pro-
vides remittance transfers for a consumer in the nor-
mal course of its business, whether or not the con-
sumer holds an account with such person or financial 
institution; and 
‘‘(4) the term ‘sender’ means a consumer who re-
quests a remittance provider to send a remittance 
transfer for the consumer to a designated recipient.’’.
insured credit union, during the 18-month period begin-
ning on the date of enactment of this Act, to subtract from 
such institution’s or credit union’s total assets in calcu-
lating compliance with the leverage limit, applicable under 
section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or section 
216(c)(2) of the Federal Credit Union Act with respect 
to such insured depository institution or insured credit 
union, an amount not exceeding the qualifying amount at-
tributable to insurance proceeds, if the agency or Adminis-
tration determines that—
(1) such institution or credit union—
(A) derives more than 50 percent of its 
total deposits from persons who normally reside 
within, or whose principal place of business is 
normally within, a qualified disaster area; 
(B) was at least adequately capitalized as 
of August 25, 2005; and 
(C) has an acceptable plan for managing 
the increase in its total assets and total depos-
its; and 
(2) the subtraction is consistent with the pur-
pose of section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Act, in the case of an insured depository institution, 
and section 216 of the Federal Credit Union Act, in 
the case of an insured credit union.
(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the 
following definitions shall apply: 
(1) LEVERAGE
LIMIT.—The term ‘‘leverage 
limit’’—
(A) with respect to an insured depository 
institution, has the same meaning as in section 
38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; and 
(B) with respect to an insured credit 
union, means the net worth ratio that cor-
responds to the leverage limit, as established in 
accordance with section 216(c)(2). 
(2) QUALIFYING
AMOUNT
ATTRIBUTABLE
TO 
INSURANCE
PROCEEDS.—The 
term 
‘‘qualifying 
amount attributable to insurance proceeds’’ means 
the amount (if any) by which the institution’s or 
credit union’s total assets exceed the institution’s or 
credit union’s average total assets during the cal-
endar quarter ending before the date of the earliest 
Presidential determination referred to in section 
3(4), because of the deposit of insurance payments 
or governmental assistance, including government 
disaster relief payments, made with respect to dam-
age caused by, or other costs resulting from, the 
major disaster within a qualified disaster area.
SEC. 8. EFFECTIVE PERIOD. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in sections 
4(2), 6(a), and 7(a) and subject to subsection (b), the pro-
visions of this Act shall not apply after the end of the 
180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
(b) 30-DAY EXTENSION AUTHORIZED.—With respect 
to the provisions of section 5, the 180-day period referred 
to in subsection (a) may be extended for 1 additional 30-
day period upon a determination by the Board of Gov-
ernors of the Federal Reserve System that such extension 
is appropriate to achieve the purposes of this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives October 27, 
2005. 
Attest:
Clerk.
II 
Calendar No. 326 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4096 
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 
DECEMBER 12, 2005 
Received; read the first time 
DECEMBER 13, 2005 
Read the second time and placed on the calendar 
AN ACT 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 
to 2006 the alternative minimum tax relief available in 
2005 and to index such relief for inflation. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stealth Tax Relief Act 
of 2005’’. 
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RE-
LIEF TO 2006. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
section 55(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are
HR 4096 PCS 
each amended by striking ‘‘and 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘, 
2005, and 2006’’. 
(b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (d) of 
section 55 of such Code is amended by inserting after 
paragraph (3) the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—In the case of any 
taxable year beginning in calendar year 2006, 
the $58,000 amount contained in paragraph 
(1)(A) and the $40,250 amount contained in 
paragraph (1)(B) shall each be increased by an 
amount equal to— 
‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de-
termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal-
endar year in which the taxable year be-
gins, determined by substituting ‘2004’ for 
‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 
‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—Any increase deter-
mined under subparagraph (A) which is not a 
multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the next 
lowest multiple of $50.’’.
HR 4096 PCS 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2005. 
Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 
2005. 
Attest: 
KAREN L. HAAS, 
Clerk.
Calendar No. 326 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION 
H. R. 4096 
AN ACT 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
extend to 2006 the alternative minimum tax re-
lief available in 2005 and to index such relief for 
inflation. 
DECEMBER 13, 2005 
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
HR 4519 RFS 
Risk Pool Funding Extension Act of 2005, is in the 
process of implementing a program to provide bene-
fits of the type described in paragraph (2), from 
being eligible for a grant under this subsection. 
‘‘(d) FUNDING.— 
‘‘(1) APPROPRIATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006.— 
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
year 2006— 
‘‘(A) $15,000,000 to carry out subsection 
(a); and 
‘‘(B) $75,000,000, of which, subject to 
paragraph (4)— 
‘‘(i) two-thirds of the amount appro-
priated shall be made available for allot-
ments under subsection (b)(2); and 
‘‘(ii) one-third of the amount appro-
priated shall be made available for allot-
ments under subsection (c)(3). 
‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
FISCAL YEARS 2007 THROUGH 2010.—There are au-
thorized to be appropriated $75,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2007 through 2010, of which, subject to 
paragraph (4)—
HR 4519 RFS 
‘‘(A) two-thirds of the amount appro-
priated for a fiscal year shall be made available 
for allotments under subsection (b)(2); and 
‘‘(B) one-third of the amount appropriated 
for a fiscal year shall be made available for al-
lotments under under subsection (c)(3). 
‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated for 
purposes of carrying out this section for a fiscal year 
shall remain available for obligation through the end 
of the following fiscal year. 
‘‘(4) REALLOTMENT.—If, on June 30 of each 
fiscal year for which funds are appropriated under 
paragraph (1)(B) or (2), the Secretary determines 
that all the amounts so appropriated are not allotted 
or otherwise made available to States, such remain-
ing amounts shall be allotted and made available 
under subsection (b) among States receiving grants 
under subsection (b) for the fiscal year based upon 
the allotment formula specified in such subsection. 
‘‘(5) NO ENTITLEMENT.—Nothing in this sec-
tion shall be construed as providing a State with an 
entitlement to a grant under this section. 
‘‘(e) APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible for a grant under 
this section, a State shall submit to the Secretary an appli-
I 
112TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 2896 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as 
the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 
Mr. PAYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
on Oversight and Government Reform 
A BILL 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 
City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino 
Post Office Building’’. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. JUDGE SHIRLEY A. TOLENTINO POST OFFICE 
BUILDING. 
(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. 
Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be known and des-
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
20:46 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2896.IH
H2896
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3946 
To provide a temporary waiver from certain transportation conformity require-
ments and metropolitan transportation planning requirements under the 
Clean Air Act and under other laws for certain areas in Louisiana 
affected by Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 
Mr. BAKER (for himself, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. ALEXANDER, 
Mr. JINDAL, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. MELANCON) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Com-
merce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
structure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdic-
tion of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To provide a temporary waiver from certain transportation 
conformity requirements and metropolitan transportation 
planning requirements under the Clean Air Act and 
under other laws for certain areas in Louisiana affected 
by Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLEAN AIR TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY; 
TEMPORARY WAIVER FOR LOUISIANA. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, until 
September 30, 2010, the provisions of section 176(c) of 
the Clean Air Act, and the regulations promulgated there-
under, shall not apply to transportation projects, pro-
grams, and plans (as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 93, Sub-
part A) for the parishes of East Baton Rouge, West Baton 
Rouge, Livingston, Ascension, and Iberville, Louisiana. 
The preceding sentence shall not apply to the regulations 
under section 176(c)(4)(B)(i) of such Act relating to Fed-
eral and State interagency consultation procedures. 
SEC. 2. METROPOLITAN PLANNING REQUIREMENTS; TEM-
PORARY WAIVER FOR LOUISIANA AREAS. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, until 
September 
30, 
2010, 
the 
provisions 
of 
sections 
134(h)(1)(D), 134(i)(3), 134(i)(5), and 134(l)(1) of title 
23 of the United States Code, and sections 5304(a)(1), 
5305(c), and 5305(e)(1) of title 49 of the United States 
Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, shall 
not apply to the Louisiana Capital Region Planning Com-
mission. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 3948 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the deductible and 
change the method of determining the mileage reimbursement rate for 
the beneficiary travel program administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 
Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. STRICKLAND) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 
A BILL 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the 
deductible and change the method of determining the 
mileage reimbursement rate for the beneficiary travel 
program administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af-
fairs. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Access to 
Health Care Act’’.
SEC. 2. VETERANS BENEFICIARY TRAVEL. 
(a) ELIMINATION OF DEDUCTIBLE.—Section 111(c) 
of title 38, United States Code, is repealed. 
(b) DETERMINATION OF MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 
RATE.—Section 111(g) of such title is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), to read as follows: 
‘‘(1)(A) In determining the amount of allowance or 
reimbursement to be paid under this section, the Secretary 
shall use the House of Representatives mileage reimburse-
ment rate. 
‘‘(B) For purposes of this section, the term ‘House 
of Representatives mileage reimbursement rate’ means the 
maximum mileage reimbursement rate for Members of the 
House of Representatives established by the Committee on 
House Administration of the House of Representatives 
pursuant to House Resolution 457, Ninety-second Con-
gress, agreed to July 21, 1971, as enacted into permanent 
law by chapter IV of the Supplemental Appropriations 
Act, 1972 (2 U.S.C. 57).’’; and 
(2) by striking paragraphs (3) and (4). 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 
this Act shall apply with respect to travel expenses in-
curred after the expiration of the 60-day period that be-
gins on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
Æ
I 
109TH CONGRESS 
1ST SESSION H. R. 4098 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 
community cancer care by Medicare beneficiaries. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
OCTOBER 20, 2005 
Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
A BILL 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve 
access to community cancer care by Medicare beneficiaries. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 
‘‘Community Cancer Care Preservation Act of 2005’’. 
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of 
this Act is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. 
Sec. 2. Use of average sales price methodology. 
Sec. 3. Improved payment for oncologist services. 
Sec. 4. Quality measures for cancer care.
Sec. 5. Improved patient participation in clinical trials. 
Sec. 6. CBO report. 
SEC. 2. USE OF AVERAGE SALES PRICE METHODOLOGY. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 
(1) in 2005, Medicare reimbursement for cer-
tain outpatient cancer drugs was changed to reflect 
average sales price rather than average wholesale 
price; and 
(2) the average sales price methodology does 
not timely reflect changes in manufacturer’s prices 
for drugs. 
(b) ADJUSTMENT TO AVERAGE SALES PRICE CAL-
CULATION.—Section 1847A of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w–3a) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(6) RECONCILIATION.—Payments made pursu-
ant to this subsection are subject to reconciliation to 
assure that such payments do not exceed or fall 
short of the actual average sales price during any 
preceding period. Such reconciliation shall be con-
ducted on a quarterly basis and the Secretary shall 
review all payments made to physicians under this 
subsection in the preceding quarter and compare 
such payment to the verified average sales price re-