Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
his coworkers have
seen hundreds of
this type of demonstrations of objects
making
"hyper time and
space flight”
and have
personall y conducted this
type
of*
‘ experiment .
Furthermore,*
we have been forced
to conduct research
into how
to establish
a theory
on
this
phenomenon
and_
to consider its
applications.
However,
this
Is far
~ f rornTbei ng" enough
to persuade other
people
that
this is
real.
Actually,
most
people who
have not
seen
this
type
of
"flight"
phenomenon
must
believe
that this type of report is
absolutely preposterous .
This
is
the
only
way
to
conform
with the
dialectical
manifestations
of
this
world.
Those who agree are
in an
extremely small
minority,
and most people only have
specific
and abstract
knowledge of
normal
flight.
If
they said
they were to say that this type
of
flight which violated common knowledge waB certain
to exist,
they would
be preposterous ,
because
they
only have
an abstract acceptance and
have
never actually observed
it.
On
the other
hand,
it
can also
be believed
that merely having seen
the specific
phenomenon and not having
a conscious
abstract knowledge
is similarly insufficient,
and
is
a
type of
incomplete
knowledge.
One
can
deny
under
certain
conditions
that
"seeing
is
believing"
and
feel
that
it
is
possibly one's
own illusion
or
a trick.
Therefore,
in
order
to prove whether or not "hyper time and space
flight"
is
a
hoax,
in addition
to specific aspects
it
is
also necessary
to have
abstract proofs
and
the
later are
difficult.
For
this type of
proof
it
would
be better and easier
to prove that "ordinary flight"
is
a
hoax.
The
reason
this
type
of
reduction
to absurdity can obtain strict proof
is
because
the world does not have any
evidence
to
the
contrary.
If we
obtain
proof
that "ordinary flight"
is also absurd,
then
the absurd
"hyper
time and space flight" may also
exist.
Therefore,
the
center
of our
research
should
be
shifted
toward
whether
or
not
"normal
flight"
is
absurd.
.
Just
as we
thought,
even though
"ordinary flight"
(just
like "hyper
time and
space flight")
has been specifically determined
to exist,
but
in
abstract thought
this type of
flight
is actually
absurd.
Therefore,
we
cannot use
abstract
thought
to directly prove that this type of
flight is
real.
Furthermore,
the
"geometric
points",
"orbits'
and
"moments"
in
the
description
of
"ordinary flight"
do not
actually exist
in
the world
of
flight.
Here,
we are not especially making
fun
of
a number
of
theoretic
scholars asking
them
to pick
up
a
"geometric
point" or
"orbit"
and
let us
see
it,
but we want
to remind
those
who
do
not
agree
with
us
not to
stubbornly believe
that your own
ideas must necessarily be the reality of
this world.
"Geometric
points",
"orbits",
"moments"
and
"speeds" are
merely
a
certain convenient convention
of
thought or a type of convenient
idea
(imagination)
and nothing
more.
If we
do not
bring forward such
conventions,
it
would
be
impossible
to
describe
ordinary
flight
in
theoretical
ideas.
That
is
to
say
that
"ordinary flight"
has
its own
absurdity.
Since
this
is
the case,
then
the theoretical
ideas of
"hyper
time and space flight"
may use another set of
"geometric
points",
"orbits"
"moments"
and
"times".
Research into
the
"hyper
time and space flight"
Df objects not only
is research of
the physical
studies of
flight,
but
is also
a philosophical
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
topic.
Because
only
these
people
-ho
the^a? m£t-
of’SZ
exists
an opposing "Hyper space end
time
f 1 ight '*
Piter we have clarified
the necessity
^istence ot ^P^t ioe
and
epace
flight.'
next^thing^ts^.rch ^ ^ spape
f llght .
ifalwayfcToselfrelated
to human thought or consciousness.
In observing
the
"hyper
a
tiee^and^space^f 1 ight'^of
.
obJesi.s..^e_|ia^e
have
someone' use
his,
f
nfe
fi Tn h t
'^~seem^ to come from thought.
~ndT
:Tve
7i
of~
"hype r
Tlrne^ and
space
f light
is
Natural y^FTIs
is
abso iu tel y
absurd
js J
concerned,
thought
(or
concerned.
Because as
reflects the objective
consciousness)
is only
a
mir f
this tvoe of dynamic
role
world.
Even
if
thought
had
a dynamic ™1«,
tta. typ«
of Zst.
Therefore,
could not move objects,
even
an extrem
*
.
is very absurd.
Now,
"hyper
for thought or consciousness
to move obje
1±d wan s "
is even more
space and
time
flight"
being able ^
"penetrate solid
the
absurd
than
thought being able to move o
J
-
out what
the
reality
of
"hyper
time
and
space
11±qht
’
”*
ind
out
« just
what
is
thoughts
(or consciousness
)
|-°nce™®j|
occur?"
This
is something we
thought”
and
"why
does
th s
P
has
been
able
to
should
look
into
because
up
until
now,
satisfactorily explain
it.
When
sc hol ^r^.^
^n^mpnt i nn^t ha t
the phenomenon
this t7^r“phcnd».dn=n !
of moving objects by thguaht_mfy
„'i'V'pn“calT‘''~ this "thought
particles"
g.r
Of particle group or.
field,
and
c.u^jl^
•• thought
field"
-
They
, *
™
breaks
oST^tlto^vg and_ihgt
, the
ryasn^BSl,^
or
fieid^fi^t
through
spacial
barrlpr^s
—nToassed
through the
spaces^ betwggn
dii5iiS^l^_|!H^5J-y
once wore
the_atoms_
tute
.‘Ihyper
time aad
reassembled
into
— ZZ^ZTakT harriers'*
-
These particles or
space flight- which
“.IgWliy
They havB th# special
field are naturally not normal
par
h
disassembly and reassembly
ffffafff: cLs^oCrffc? fThffpJfcf; or field.
Otherwise.
science becomes a children's fantasy
tale.
1C
ha
gprv
haoDV
if
the explanation above
for
Truthfully,
we
„w.QUi.d
be
very
happy ^
objects
by
thought"
-thought par tic lesJl^r_^hgught
.
*
*
fypp
o f“
explanation
is
simple.
pFS^sT-tB
be
_ true ,
because
thi
/V
require
a revolution
in
Furthermore,
it could
retal,
;
ph^”
tJcles thought particles%
then
its
physics.
If one proposes the new Particles
P
th
- 5
type of easy
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-72
("thought particles"
or
"thought
field"),
the , object, JLUat—have its own
consciousness.
We know that
in order for higher classes can control
lower
classes,
and
for
lower classes can obey
the orders of
higher classes,
the
higher and
lower classes must have consciousness or
thoughts.
Therefore,
if one believes that
ordinary objects
also have
.conscious thought,
then
the special
thought "thought particles"
or "consciousness"
fields actually
become meaningless.
In
other
words,
this type
of expl anation actually
believes that
the
"world
is composed
of
thought" .
therefore,
it would
be
impossible
to maintain
the science of physics which has nothing
at all
to
do
with
thought
and
it
would
be
in direct opposition
to the original
purpose
.
The reason we do not
like
to
use
"thoug ht
partic les"
or "thought
fields'
is
Because these concepts come from the concepts of the particles
and~Tields of
physic s
an'd^TTrat they~are~ objects of thought or conceptually
abstract.
Actually,
should we discover
that
"hyper
time and space
flight"
afe~reTated
to
thought,
and
that
the physics
concepts of
"particles and
fields"
are
actually
related
to
thought,
we
will
feel
that
it
is
unnecessary and
a waste
of
time
to use "particles and
fields"
to
tour the
world.
In other
words,
when
we Jry
to find
the reasons
for., "hyper time
and space flight",
we must determine exactly what thought
is.
However,
we
must not
use
the
lim i ted manifestations
(physical)
of
thought
to explain
what thought
is.
Present day
physics
is
only
a
type of
convention,
a
i m~i ted convent ion .
cannot completely explain thought.
For examples
"A bowl
cannot
tell
the bowl
maker
what
it
would
like
to
be
used
to
contain."
(This quote was taken from "Ande Book of Martyrs"
)
.
Then,
why
must we take
this winding route
in our .research?
\l
Therefore,
when we do research into
" hyper time and space
f light", we
1 1 are
wasting
DL|—
g-
effor'C"'""!'?' we
' attempt "to 'use
. modern
science,.
Actually,
we
explored
many
different
directions,
for
example,
modern
electromagnetic
theory,
quantum mechanics,
the theory
of relativity and
the theory of gravity
all
of
which were
of no
use in
explaining
" hyper
time
and
space
flight".
Furthermore,
tHrough this research,
we were
deeply convinced
that
the
jworld described
by modern
science,
especially
physics,
is
far
from what the rea l
wor ld actually
is.
However,
there
will
of
necessity
be
a great deal
of difficulties
in
ridding oneself
of
the restrictions of
the contents of
the book shelves
to
try
to
find out
exactly what
"hyper
time and space flight" actually
is.
Most of
the difficulties will
be
those
in terpersonal
difficulties.
This
is because
on
the one
hand,
people with this type of ability do not
think
in
the same way or have the same thought habits as normal
people.
On
the
other
hand,
"the rarer
something
is
the more
valuable it
is".
Certain
people use this as
a marketable commodity or simply perpetrate fraud.
The
second difficulty
will
be
like we
mentioned
above,
the
reasQD-Jete-_£apnot
use today's most advanced
elec troni c
in.s;fcru_men ts
to explain
"hyper
time
and
space
lliight"
is
because
el ectronic
JjmtrumeilAs were designed
to
measure
" ordinary "
flight according
to
a
certain
conventions
(physics,
^etcT“of
thought.
Naturally,
all
of
the difficulties mentioned above are
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
i j
_ x
"nrrlindrV
"fliC|ht M
0"f
thflt, WOT 1 d
0"f
caused
by
the rejection
by our world
of
ordinary
g
"hyper
time and space flight
•
Because of
this rejection,
and because
••hyper time and space flight
are wea^’ i—
-i
ceJtain person with this
or
weakened.
For—
—!5£jL
.
f
thovn^f'4 to
maintain
this
anirrtrwhe relied on what
consider fantasy /^oughts^
t<> ,t(J-y our
,Thyper"
^Ofne
and^^Bpace
Tha f
f rain
afastrac t thoughts
such as
curriculum,
especially such subj
..
abilities would quickly become
mmhernaMc^we
wouJC^^
the excess
weaker.
Also,
there is
the
adve,T9R
rl^T^ t
itionll
period.
This
for
ideals
by young PBoplm during
their transition
Ss
people of
i5 because
the vast
led
two
worlds mutual
rejection
ordinary abilities*
Thi
,
.
other
but not both-
effect.
The result
is
that one can
have one or
the other.
Because of
this,
in order
to maintain^ this
continually have
replacements of
new personnel
restore
the "or i g Inal
powers to^these people.
There are
also
a
very
sma ll
number of_„ persons who
havei
. this type
-
Pr°^dr^s:“c”rs
h
:rth
r
Ti:"£
abnormal
ideological
stat-*
y
j
*.n ordinary people and
.
.
THdw nffpn
cppm
to
be odd
when compared
to ordinary
data.
They often
seem
utr
u.
Hi f f icul ties
in working
cause our researchers
to
lose hope because of
the difficulties
with them.
Even
though
'•hyper time and space flight" may be lh
J ’““J™
sign if icance^
*^fw^rindl^te'^that man’s Knowledge of
the world
is still
in
a state
of
ignorance.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6