t
SGAjbproved For Release 2©Ofi/O8rt<aAOMiP»BP06-OO792ROOO5OO23OOO3^/J//? *,
^ JL^t
TT*
°U7T^,
(A, .J
Informational Interaction of Isolated r
92A50046 Unknown city - USSR Unknown in Russian Unknown (Unknown Pub Date)
Unknown pp 341-357
[Article by R. F. Avramenko, V.
I. Nikolayeva, and V. N. Pushkin
[Text]
I. Problem of the information component of biofield interactions.
A special feature of biofield interactions is the transfer of information from one biofield
structure to another. Two types of relationship can be articulated for structures of that kind
that effect the process of information transfer. One type of structure is associated with
interactions within a system, such as the brain. An example of such a biofield interaction
could be instantaneous — in the terminology of psychology, simultaneous -- recognition. That
recognition of very familiar objects suggests the interaction of a biofield model of an
impression that comes from without and structures that were previously formed and are
models of already perceived objects. Resonant contact of that sort produces the effect of
virtually instantaneous drawing on past experience of a needed reference and can be
considered the mechanism underlying simultaneous recognition.
Processes associated with thinking and with problem solving can be placed in that category of
informational interactions between systems that are spatially isolated from each other. In the
course of mental activity, the individual is known to create for himself something new, and
that new semantic system usually enables the individual to solve a complex problem facing
him. As numerous psychological studies show, the principal language the individual uses in
his thinking is the language of systems of relationships between objects. If one approaches
that psychological reality from the standpoint of the formation and work of biofield
structures, then two components can be articulated in a system of relationships — certain
biofield equivalents of objects, and the stable field interactions of those equivalents,
interactions that are the equivalents of the interactions between the objects.
In analyzing a given problem situation, the individual constructs a model of that situation that
consists of, once again, the equivalents of the elements that make up the problem, plus the
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/15
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
interactions between those equivalents. A good example of how the model of the situation is
constructed is the process that takes place in the head of a chess player when he is analyzing
his position on the chessboard. When he considers his position, the chess player perceives the
pieces as functional points of sorts that have given properties of movement. In
comprehending those properties of movement, he constructs a system of relationships among
the pieces that become the basis of the functioning of his game strategy.
It’s not difficult to see that that process — just like the process of
instantaneous, simultaneous
recognition that we alluded to — presumes, of necessity, the existence of biofield interactions,
the relationships constructed in the analysis of the situation absolutely must interact with the
relationships that constitute the content of the chess player’s experience. Only on the basis of
the realization of past relationships can the semantic system of a new situation develop.
Thus, analysis shows that the resonance between biofield structures js also a very important
aspect in an individual’s thinking. But in that context,
it is not a resonance of representations
of a single specific object that takes place, but a resonance of systems that include certain
field equivalents of objects and of the relationships among them.
The exchange of information between completely isolated biological objects can be considered
another typ^ oF informational hiofield interaction. An example of that sort ofJnteraction
is
r^tdipath^ when information that is not encodedln known languages specially designed for
V
~~the tfimsfer of information is transmitted from one individual to another.
As a great deal of the literature shows, those sorts of biomformational interactions can
involve the transfer of the most varied of types of psychological manifestations. With
telepathy
it is possible to convey an action^Jhe image of m objec^a meaningfuL
structure, or an emotional state. That means that in that kind of bioinformational contact,
thCTe is an interaction of biofield systems of various levels and modalities of the brains of two
individuals who are separated from each other.
All those types of biofield interactions, in which information is transferred from one system
\
to another, are characterized first and foremost by the fact that the transfer of information
/
involves no direct energy expense. Of course, each of the biofield systems that are associating
with each other needs some amount of energy for its very existence.
It s also probable that
the features of the information exchange between the systems — the clarity , the efficiency
,
and the so-called capacity of the exchange - are associated with the energy characteristics of
those systems. The process itself of informational interaction, unlike known hardware
systems, does not require energy.
In that context, the problem arises of identifying the physical laws, thatJWPuld^enable,one to
undertake the analysis of the ^onnational_bt^ctiqn between spatially separate^stems that
does notTequire any expenditure of energy for its existence. Later,
it will be shown that there
akeady^Hsts in m(xlera“ph>^tes ~the^theoretical and experimental data that enable us to take
up an examination of just such an energy-free transfer of information.
Approved For Release 200W(SmSl9&^^f^M-00792R0005002Z000Z-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/15
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
for official use only
Here we should pause on certain aspects of biofield structures. That’s all the more a good
idea because the concept itself of biological field remains essentially undefined and is far
from being completely analyzed in theoretical terms. The concept comes to biology from
physics and is a unique analogy of the remote interactions between objects that are
traditionally called fields in physics.
It is unquestionable, however, that the reality that got the name of biological field fromA,
G. Gurvich has, from the very outset, certain properties that indicate that the remote
interactions between biological systems are substantially different from the physical
interactions to which the concept of field has been affixed.
The most striking property of the biofield - one that is specific and fundamentally unique -
is
its dynamic systematism complicated by the property of sehgtmty. The cells of the cortex
of the major hemispheres, for example, which make up a certain functional system of the
brain
can detect field interactions between themselves, although they may be separated by
rather considerable amounts of space. Those cells cannot, however, have any kind of field
interactions with cells that are situated right next to them. Moreover,
it is obvious that
functional structures are constantly changing as a function of the tasks of human activity.
That is why any given biofield interaction of any element of the brain may be replaced after a
given period of time by an interaction with totally different elements. Physical fields, as a
rule, are not acquainted with such selective systematism or such dynamism among elements.
The informativeness of biofield structures must also be considered a unique quality. Analyses
shows that biofields always come about and function only in the context of the processes o
generation and transfer of biological information. That link between biological fields and
bioinformational processes is a property intrinsic to those unique fields. Unlike biofields,
known physical fields can perform the function of information carrier only if some outside
influence is applied to them.
It is significant that the informativeness of a physical field,
which comes about as the result of the exertion of a systematic outside influence - the
modulation of an electromagnetic field, for example - has no significance whatsoever for the
existence and functioning of the physical system that generates or receives such modulation
The whole of the informativeness of the dynamics of physical fields has meaning only for the
individual who created the physical systems in question -- radio receivers and transmitters,
for example.
But with biological fields, their informativeness is directly linked to the existence, the life
process of the biological systems in which the fields function.
All those unique features of biological field interactions make them so different from die field
interactions of objects known to physics that they make the term "field"
itself, as applied to
the processes of living systems, extremely arbitrary and, to a large extent, metaphorical.
Perhaps, in the future we will think about creating a new concept, one that more adequately
reflects the properties of those specific
[\Illegible
J
interactions.
Approved For Release 200^M§?\ilA
U-fftfP^-00792R000500230003-5
Approved For Release !®5(^§i^V4iffi-
<R6^96-00792R000500230003-5
For all their fundamental uniqueness, however, what we are now calling interacUons between
biofield structures are interactions that are either physical or biophysical. And the fact that
those complex interactions are beyond the pale not only of physics, but also of ^
of natural
science indicates that in our picture of the world, something fundamental was left out when
the principles of natural-science inquiry were being formed.
There is reason to believe that that omission was associated with the fact that the object of
most of the study of natural sciences was matter and the processes taking place m it.
course
one
hz\y but
that, in addition to matter, the objects filling the world also
havg3info But in the system of the world, the form of an object has not been given the
significance of a fundamental factor. The category of form was made chiefly the object of
philosophical analysis. However, the actual existence of fbrnynj^egts ^
^some aiways
specific material structure poses the challenge of revealn >%
its^wayglau(i.
_e_ _J?rqpgJjes.
At present, the reality of the physical properties - especially fiejd properties - of the f^ni in
objects can be proven by many groups of facts. Among such facts_are the d^jhaLpomLfeL
the existence of a charged layer around the human,body,. Those data also include data
Imhcating the effectiveness of manipulating biologically active points of the skin. As ancient
theoreticians of acupuactULe assert,
life-giving energy is concentrated around the human body
in the space near the skin.
Constituting another group of facts pointing to the existence of forms as wave (or field)
structures are those of (?lozokhodstva?), which was named too broadly and not entirely
adequately by the term "biophysical effect." Analysis shows that the basis of that effect may
be the interaction of the structural features of the external field (aura) of an operator and the
external fields (form) of the sought-for object.
There is reason to believe that the properties of biofield structures that are responsible for the
informational interaction of those structures are linked to specific features of the_formm_
objects existing as a physical reality . Discovering those features could be of interest to a
^
whole array of branches oflmowledge;
it presumes a special theoretical and experimental
analysis of fundamental problems. Such analysis will probably be performed m the near
future.
In the context of all these remarks, of special interest are the physical data that are already
enabling the analysis of the possibilities of informational interactions. In particular, of great
importance are the physical tenets that demonstrate how information exchange can take place,
with no expenditure of energy, between spatially separate systems.
H. A possible physical interpretation of the informational interaction between isolated
systems, without the transfer of energy.
The experimental data accumulated to date on informational interaction of biological systems
that is not an exchange of information via electromagnetic signals or particles force us to
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5