datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130001-8
movement
the whole
time,
happy,
joyful,
etc.
She
also claimed
to see
an
axle,
but
could not give any details.
Although
the merry-go-round
as
a gestalt was not
recognized,
the ambience
of
the place was well conveyed
by
the subject's
descriptions.
There was
feedback
to
the subject only
the day following
the experiment.
7)
The seventh
target was an auditorium at
SRI with
a flood-lit
stage
and
red carpets
throughout.
The outbound experimenter was R.T.
.
The subject's description was
of
a patterned
carpet in
a large
well-lit
room.
The subject saw
a scalloped design covering
this
interior
space,
in reds and maroons,
and submitted
a drawing which matched well
the array of seat backs.
She correctly described
the experimenter
as
leaving the brightly lit area
(stage)
after
five minutes
and moving
to
a
second area in the room.
This was
the
first
indoor
target area we have used with
this
subject.
We consider her description excellent both with regard
to structure
and ambience, though again
the significance was not cognized.
Post-
experiment feedback was given.
8) A church
in Palo Alto served
as
the final target
in
the series.
It
is
a
tall, modern, very elegant building.
The subject's
first comments
are
of
a
tall august lofty building
that must be
a library or
a church,
very solemn.
She describes
a cross
or kite
at
the end
of
the solemn hall.
The outside
is
correctly described
as gray masonry with cutouts
for windows.
The remote
experimenter
(R.T.)
is correctly described
as
leaving
the building by
a concrete passageway.
We consider
this
to be
the best match of
the series with respect
to
structure,
ambience, and activity of remote experimenter.
No feedback
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130001-8
SGFOIA3 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130001-8 Next 15 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130001-8
Approved For Release 2002/11/18
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3
C.
Second-Stage Screening Protocol
1.
Viewers
The goal
of second-stage screening
is to
select exceptional individuals who could
participate in research.
Individuals who showed qualitative evidence of remote viewing ability in
the group screening described above, either by producing an average qualitative rating above three
or producing a qualitative rating of six or seven on at least one trial are invited to participate in a
second round of individualized screening in the laboratory.
2.
Targets
Targets for second-stage screening were the same as for the initial group screening.
3.
Session Protocol
For the second-stage screening, no sender was used.
Before a session begins, a remote
viewing monitor
(i.e., an individual who interviews the viewer) selects the top opaque envelope,
containing a target number as described above, from a randomly ordered stack of envelopes. The
monitor places that sealed envelope adjacent to the video disk unit which is locked in a separate
and isolated room during the remote viewing session. The sequence of events for each trial was as
follows:
•
The monitor and viewer enter a remote viewing laboratory which
is isolated from the
target room.
They
sit opposite each other across
a
table
in a
well-lit,
office-type
environment.
(This
is SRI's standard remote viewing protocol.)
•
After a brief relaxation period, the viewer is instructed to describe the target with written
words and drawings.
•
The remote viewing session is five to fifteen minutes. During this time, the monitor is free
to seek clarification from the viewer about words, drawings, and other information that
arise during the session.
(NOTE:
The monitor
is blind to the target selection.)
•
The data (response papers)
is collected, secured, and copied.
•
The viewer and monitor leave the remote viewing laboratory and enter the target room.
The target
is displayed on a video monitor for the viewer as feedback.
(NOTE:
The
viewer only has a copy of his/her response. Thus, there is no opportunity to add anything
to the response.)
4.
Analysis
j
Quantitative analysis presents no problem
if each viewer
is tested individually.
Each
response was ranked against the intended target and its three associated decoys by an independent
Approved For Release 2002/11/18
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600160001-8 996 /8210 /08 Boxes are provided to the right of each question. Only one box should be checked for each question asked. If you have any comments which you would like ta make emphasizing the accuracy of the information or with reference to any information not generally covered in this format, please write them on the reverse of this page, or attach an additional page. - Response to Tasking Responses* SG1A , Does information provided satisfy your intelligence collection require- ment? Accuracy Geographical location (terrain, water, river, etc.) Large scale man-made objects (docks, ‘silos, buildings, etc.) ,Small scale man-made objects (tanks, computers, antennas, etc.) Target ambience (research, production, administration, troop movement, etc.) Activity (nuclear testing, CBR, SIGINT monitoring, etc.) Personality (Physical, plans, actions, traits, etc.) Utility Please check which best describes: the utility of the information pravided (in view of what is known at this time, un- derstanding that additional information could raise or lower such an interim ass essment at a later date) *YES » indicates a full agreement with what is known to be fact about the target. NO - indicates a total lack of agreement with what is known ta be fact about the target. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600160001-8 a
j { A . vo SRE Raima’? ZOOURRDG, Gle-RDP26-a07eaR08z00r1 - - Mail - - . August 16, 1993 1:09pm MAIL IS - FROM: DIR_NMIPC Urgent TO: NMIPC_ALL FOR YOUR - SUBJECT: Weekly SARs Information Action copy: CT? I sci) U-328/PC 1. As you know, the DR is an avid reader of our our weekly Sigificant Acti Report (SAR). Such items generally have been accounts of completed actions accomplishments. These are useful not just for the Command Element, but al for us (as you know, we send the SARs to all NMIPC personnel via Hignote an the EBB to keep everyone abreast of their colleagues’ activities). 2. The DR is also interested in expanding our submission and receiving SAR items of "any problems/issues/arguments/debates." Please expand your SAR i that are discussed/reviewed at our Wednesday NMIPC Staff Meeting to cover t topics, which will frequently relate to ongoing actions. SG1J 3. Thank you. Mail item created by Mail item created by Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002600110006-6
lease 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDPQ eer er mT Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130002-7
ee ogee my atm Approved For tele 2000/08 “ ase
7 Hout 001 pis 3 ASL USER «DAY “OF” th — Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100130002-7
Vs
025
S s
9 s 00- 1 0 s 00
ERV
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The target personality
is
a dark haired
man
who
is intelligent
and
who has had
to be resource! ul
.
He
is
a
"Freedom tighter".
This
man
is action oriented
and
is associated with
or has been around
tire and weaponry to include missiles.
In another scene,
not associated with the man
above,
there was
a
woman driving down
a road
in
a blue titties car who was portrayed
on
a staticy television.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002500030003-9
Approved For Release 2900/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R00010Q1$0001-3 url FIGURE 5 (Continued) Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 ww Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CiA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 FIGURE’ 5 (Concluded) |
Approved For Release,g900/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000108480001-3 FIGURE 6 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP'96-00787R000100180001-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 oye ot o 2 : Oo " | 3 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 26 FIGURE 7 5!
Approved For Release.g800/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R00010Q)480001-3 FIGURE 8 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 ; 27
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 4{8EC..CL.| ORIGIN - : CONTROL NO. oo - wie We DATE OUT {SUSPENSE DATE cross REFERENCE OR OINT OF FILING DATE ROUTING SENT ‘Technical: Memorandam A Progress 1S/O2: Report:on Contract 1471 —_____ 1 copy Rec cid = Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3
Approved For Release 2000/0AB€M5TEbP96-00789R002200390001 -5
C.
(U) Phase III—Applications
(S/NF) While continuing Phases
I and
II
on specific
items of
interest,
Phase
III will be devoted toward applications of interest for
the DoD.
This activity should include at
least two parts:
(1) Applications research—Formulate and test hypotheses
that are specific with regard to potential
applications
.
(2) Application testing—Under actual operational
conditions,
conduct psychoenergetic activity to assess
field utility.
IV.
Financial Report
(S/NF) During FY 1985
a total of $1,240 K was allocated to contract
DAMD17-83-C-3106 for the psychoenergetic investigation and review.
All
moneys were expended
in accomplishing the stated objective.
-SECRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200390001-5
Approved For Release^(j^g/^ jgjy|gl^6-00789R002200390001-5
APPENDIX A
A FIGURE OF MERIT ANALYSIS FOR FREE-REPONSE
(This Appendix Is Unclassified)
Approved For Release 2(^fl^8
,r^RDP9trD0789R002200390001-5
Approved For Release
00789R002200390001 -5
A FIGURE OF MERIT ANALYSIS FOR FREE-RESPONSE
MATERIAL
by
E. C. May
B.
S. Humphrey
C. Mathews
SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
ABSTRACT:
A
simplified automated procedure
is suggested for
the
analysis of
free-response material.
As
in
earlier similar procedures,
the
target and response
materials
are coded as yes/no answers
to a
set of questions
(descriptors).
By
definition,
this coding defines the complete target and response information.
The
accuracy of the response
is defined as
the percent of the
target
material
that
is
correctly described
(i.e., number of correct response bits divided by the number of
target
bits =
I).
The
reliability of the response
is defined as
the percent of the
response that is correct
(i.e. the number of correct response bits divided by the total
number of response bits a I).
The figure of merit is the product of the accuracy and
reliability.
The advantages and weaknesses of the figure of merit are discussed with
examples.
INTRODUCTION
With the increased use of computers in parapsychology laboratories,
it has become possible
to consider more complex methods of analysis to provide deeper insight into the mechanisms of
the
phenomena.
The
Engineering
Anomalies
Research
Laboratory,
Princeton
University,
provided a major advancement in the analysis of free-response material (Jahn, Dunne and Jahn,
1980).
THE PRINCETON EVALUATION PROCEDURE (PEP) - A BRIEF REVIEW
In
general, the Princeton Evaluation Procedure
(PEP)
is based on comparing a priori,
quantitatively-defined
target
information
with
similarly
quantitatively-defined
response
information.
So defined, the PEP applies various methods of mathematical comparisons to arrive
at a meaningful assessment score for remote viewing responses.
A-l
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200390001-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002 SESso tron SUMMARY A. SESSION DATA: . ql- q Task/Target No. |- | Source No. D52 Date Task Received I9 Aug 4 Date Summary Returned Al Aug ral Session ‘Date aD Bug Gf Target Designator Session Start Time (£310 er ESOS ey Mend BA et EN ES Session Stop Time L415 Reacon/Sender No. Session No. | Session Type SHO Session Method —— (M) onitored, alo (CRY, ERV, WRV, etc.) Monitor No. (if any) — Estimate of Outcome Low (iiigh, Median, Cow) Possible Session Aids/ Distractions: fi fALL he ; 2 Paysite Ap) On Ati 2 DOOOUDTOL B. SESSION GUMMARY: (Below, or see unary and worksheets attached) The trroet o a male person. Mb Aa dbuaol/qeon eyto ant (weara hy Fain bv mn wan GUN, A 0 Bw Aomenat « he wv a tale man wt a Large fununy. Ne vo ic a AOTHA wooded GALA Lotil many YP poured. $2200 and Geen dnubbery. Sean Aor a bangs ound and DUAD, Ture io a musty anell ant aldo a woman preaene . The man iy Mad, Argoy and Oeplidded Ke @ rot happy Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002500030006-6 What do un ward b Know about hind
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002
SESSION SUMMARY
A.
SESSION DATA:
Task/Target No._M
Source
No.
Date Task Received
Date Summary Returned
3\j
*?/
Session Date _J&JkAJLL
Inn
Target Designator
Beacon/Sender
No.
Session Start Time
Session Stop Time
Session
No.
L
1310
Ml£.
SolD
Session Type
— -
-—
(M)onitored,
(<S))olo
Monitor
No.
(if
any)
—
Session Method
. ORV
(<CRy,
ERV,
WRV,
etc.)
Estimate
of Outcome
U)lA
(High,
Medium, (Low^
Possible Session Aids/ Distractions:
_M 0
—
-
fofchk cm uaitHb
ff
iMMimiltM l
B
SESSION SUMMARY :
(Below,
or see summary and worksheets attached)
rrx
- g-
\kiubbviu
•
J (Loui Mwi ol
y^j ^
oc muA 4mU. ard aUc
o~
loanuu?
*
Th rm
lo
and ok/mdcd.
Ht
io m±Juopf><j
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002500030006-6
>
d'fooch do
uyud d)
oibuud' hum <
Approved  For  Release^00/08/10  :   CIA-RDP96-00787R0001 0(^0001 -3 
U*l 
Approved  For  Release  2000/08/10  :   CIA-R^96-00787R000100180001-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 ww 80 60 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CiA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 FIGURE’ 5 (Concluded) |
Approved  For  Release^P00/08/1 0  :   CIA-RDP96-00787R0001 00*80001 -3 
FIGURE  6 
Approved  For  Release  2000/08/10  :   CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 
2   5
Approved For Release.Z800/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R00010Q)80001-3 t—+-—+— +4 pach loa wifes EE) FIGURE 8 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 27
Approved For Release 2003/09/09 : ¢ #01: #634 #01: #633 #01: #633 #01: Approved For Release 2003/09/09 § GjAé e | 8 Role ct -3 REMOTE VIEWING SESSION 848 (DRAWING NARRATIVE) — Okay. Why don't you start with item one on your page there, and describe your drawings to me. All right. Item 1 is the, what I feel is the target of the thing, I was most drawn to..... One.....1 went to the place of the coordinates. What I.saw initially was a square within a square. Like you see in diagram 1A. And, I couldn't tell whether it was a tunnel or a vertical spire. When I came off to the side of it, what I'll label as 1B here, and that is where I got the tower feeling. The legs curved as ...... The legs flared, right. Flared out as they come up, and the top...several segments on these flared legs are the same size. And, then it comes to a peak. I think there were Interlocking little different things through there, but that may have been........ Sort of like ascaffolding type of thing, maybe. Like bracese, sort of things, perhaps. And then off in this direction here, I'11 label that direction X, is where I got the feeling like I was seeing something like an office building with the roof taken off of it. I got a perspective. feeling of little cubicles. Little cubicle having all different shades and there was something inside the cubicle which, maybe, that's what gave me the feeling of offices. I thought I was looking and seeing chairs and desks and stuff. And, then when you said look around and see what the most prominent thing was or.what attracted me, I got the feeling of a city...just a bunch of geometric shapes butt up against one another. And, that's when Item Number 4, which is a spire which looks like the shape of the Washington Monument with a circular pathway around the bottom of it came out You're saying it just looked like it? P}PSy80788R001400040001-3
Approved  For  Release  2000/08/10  :   CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3 
Approved  For  Release  2000/08/10  :   CIA-RDP96-00787R000100180001-3
Approved For Release 2(Wd/0^rDfA«RDP9M)0789R002200390001-5
Response Definition
The descriptor
list shown in Table
is applied in exactly the same way in order to
define each remote viewing response.
In the SRI program, remote viewers do not
fill in the
descriptor list; rather, this task is performed by an analyst who is blind to the target.
However, a
set of a priori defined guidelines must be established in order to aid the analyst in consistently
interpreting the responses.
Analysis
The target-pool independent scoring algorithm makes an assessment of the accuracy
and
reliability of a
single response when matched only against the target material used in the
session. As described above, the target and response materials are defined as the yes/no answers
to a descriptor
list (Table
1).
Once the session material
is coded into binary, we define session
reliability and accuracy as follows:
Accuracy
number of correct response bits
number of target bits =
Reliability
number of correct response bits
number of response bits =
In other words, the accuracy
is the fraction of the target material that is correctly perceived, and
the
reliability is the fraction of the response that
is correct.
Neither of these measures, by themselves, is sufficient for a meaningful assessment.
For
example,
in
the
hypothetical
situation
in which
the
viewer
simply
reads
the
Encyclopedia
Bntanmca as his/her response,
it
is certain that the accuracy would be
1.0 simply because
all
possible target descriptors would have been mentioned.
This would not be compelling evidence of
psi.
Similarly, in a response consisting of one correct word, the reliability would be 1.0, with little
evidence of psi as well. We define the figure of merit (FM)
as:
Figure of Merit = Accuracy
, x
Reliability
» Q
The figure of merit, which ranges between zero and one, provides an accurate assessment of the
response.
In the example above where the Encyclopedia Britannica is the response, the FM will
be low.
Although the accuracy
is one, the
fraction of the response that
is correct
(i.e. the
reliability) will be very small.
Likewise, in the example of a single correct word as a response, the
reliability
is one, but the accuracy
is low.
A-6
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200390001-5
Approved For Release 2003/04/18
: CIA-RDP96-00789R0030001 70001-0
]
REPORT No.
DATE
1 . i/oT-S-1 003-S
9 NOU 90
2. i/flT-S-1 004-S
15 NOU 90
3.\/dT-S-1005-S
16 NOU 90
4. >/dT-S-1006-SS
5. v DT-S-1 007-S
21 NOU 90
29 NOU 90
6.JDT-S-1 008-S
20 DEC 90
7. 'AlT-S-l 009-S
19 DEC 90
8. \fDT-S-1 01 0-S
9. >/DT-S-l 01 2-S
10. ^DT-S-1 01 3-S
13 DEC 90
10 JRN 91
10 JRN 91
11.
\/DT-S-1015-SL
12. \/DT-S-1 01 6-S
15 JRN 91
15 JRN 91
13.
%^T-S-1017-S
14. /DT-S-1 019-S
17 JAN 91
18 JHN 91
TITLE
COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS-
PSVCHOENERGETICS
BRSIC RND RPPLIED RESERRCH-
GENERRL PLRN
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DRTB BRSE-
PSVCHOENERGETICS
OPERATIONAL PROJECT PROTOCOLS
BASIC RND RPPLIED RESEARCH-
FIRST YERR OBJECTIUES
HUTOMRTIC DATA PROCESSING
(RDP) SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
PROTOCOL FOR BERCON PERSON
TRRGETING
EURLURTION METHODS
POTENTIRL TASKING MECHANISM
PRELIMINARY RSSESSMENT OF
FOREIGN PSYCHOENERGETICS
ACTIO ITY DEMONSTRATION
INITIAL COLLECTION PLANS -
PSYCHOENERGETICS
PROJECT REOIEUJ BOARD
PROJECT UPDATE
Approved For Release 2003/04/18
: CIA-RDP96-00789R00300j^g001-0
=, Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : cla-RDP96-00789R00250h0340%5.8 2) SESSION SUMMARY q |- O52 Task/Target No. Source No. Date Task Received Mabe do g { Date Summary Returned C ) UY /4 G | fully. A. SESSIGN DATA: Session Date Target Designator ql—-4_ “Session Start Time le 9 SOLD bee Session Stop Time Ls ~fbofO Heacon/Sender No. Session No. D! Session Type SOLO Session Method (M)onitored, (S)olo (CRY ERV, WRV, etc.) none ow Monitor No. (if any) Estimate of Outcome \ (High, Medium Low) Possible Session Aids/ Distractions: P : D o seal Pte Ta forget oe male person. We tas dark Oiaorfblace hair cack Bron tyes « Heo hair 2 dhort and Jomumtat baldcg on Top. Kh 4ag A Acuna face area np mustoshe  L feck that Ae 10 Oteentat, poascbly Chineag,, but am not Lute. He iw admecased/ lotth a heaves Lane burly man uit. dark tar ond o dearol « | foaatle prolesscon on arg pester Ld nm Qeverteat . Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002500030015-6
2, Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003800060001-4 <> bo errr, EY trenayhA VOI tail veyticol lovee . awe smol| Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003800060001-4
SGI J
Approved For Release 2000/0^]
96-00789R0026001 1 001 3-8
TOPIC:
SUMMARY
STAR GATE Overview Briefing
(U)
(S/NF/WN)
This responds to the Director's
question of our
28 Jan
SAR,
"What prompted
his interest?"
Mr.
Danzig's
interest
in STAR
GATE was prompted by
a recent briefing tha
was presented to him by Mr.
John Petersen
o
the Arlington Institute on non— lethal
warfare.
During that briefing Mr.
Petersen
informed the Under Secretary of our probable
existence.
Mr.
Petersen,
a retired US Army
COL,
was once assigned to USAINSCOM at Fort
Meade,
MD,
in the early
80 's.
As
a result,
Mr.
Danzig contracted RADM Shaefer,
USN,
Director of Naval Intelligence,
who in-turn
contacted the Director,
NMIPC,
requesting the
brief ina.
ACTION OFFICER/
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
SG1A
Approved For Release 200
..... I eiAltRlF^6-00789R0026001 1 001 3-8
1121
B
Approved For Release
6-00789R003600330001-6
PROJECT 91002
REPRODUCTION REQUIRES APPROVAL OF
ORGINATOR OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY.
FURTHER DISEMINATION ONLY AS DIRECTED
BY DT OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY.
14 JANUARY
1991
CLASSIFIED
BY:
DIA/DT
DECLASSIFY BY:
OADR
ROT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN RATIONAL!
Approved For Release 20
G/Rfes-jjC0789R003600330001-6
A.
SESSION DATA
Task/Target
No.
Source
No.
Q5Z
Date Task Received
X/|
fkrk
^
[
Date Summary Returned
—l
^
Session Date
Target Designator
MkL
Beacon/Sender
No.
Session
Start Time
^
Session
Stop Time
__lk^4Ll—U^iC-
Session
No.
T) l
——
—
5OLD
Session Type
——
(M)onitored,
(S)olo
Monitor
No.
(if
any)
Session Method
Estimate
o-f Outcome
(CRY,
ERV,
WRV,
etc.)
(High, Medium^Low)
Possible Session Aids/ Dictions,
.
/
.
L
/
Hi ..//?,
tj.^4
Possible session hius/
ZJ.
i
-/
^nA
w,.i wmL m qUlm
'St/
B.
SESSION SUMMARY !
/Below,
or see summary and worksheets attached)
Tk kmd w
ft- wWr f^e/i
• & dm dmt bm&yblaet
kn aud him
^ u M w
,
,
d
i-
CT-AnA
tj[_ 4w> & daund Jj3,dz
cuzd-
MtiSked taMcm M lop
*• -w
J
no MUTkul*
.
i julksd
Ju
^
MMfihU?,
.
ZuM
ibcnMt,j UcunmfdM.
Ik « aw*M
lotfLA
heanj, Wf<
mn ^ dMt Jkc'i
and
ft-
ht&Ajd-
•
jmsui
ik
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002500030015-6
Approved For Release 2004/09 SE: TIA-RDP96-00789R00260015001 1-6 STARGATE vt - The conferees agree to provide $2,000,000 for the STARGATE program as proposed by the Senate. The conferees support the continuation of DIA’s specialized HUMINT initiative encompassed in ait the STARGATE program and, following last‘ year’s practice, are Maiti including R&D funding so that the program may pursue a long term research and operations | plan without constant review and adjustment. | nn i ae * ' The conferees direct ‘that the Director of DIA realign ten civilian billets within DIA to be dedicated solely to the STARGATE Program. In addition, the conferees direct that the $2,000,000 in 11 C NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS RECLASSIFIED BY: QDT SECRET DECLASSIFY ON: OADR | Approved For Release 2004]03/0BE CIA-RDP96-00789R002600150011-6