datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
Approved For Release 2001/03/07
: CIA-RDP96-00789R00240041 0001-0
SESSION INFORMATION
A.
TARGET DATA:
Task/Target No.
: 93-149-P
Session No.
:oi
B.
PERSONAL DATA:
Source No.
1025
Monitor's No.
:N/A
Beacon/ Sender No.
:N/A
C.
SESSION DATA:
Date Task Received
:15 Jan
Session Date
: 15 Jan
Start Time
: ll: 00
Stop Time
: 12 : 00
Method Used
:ERV
Aids/Distractions
(Pis)
:N/A
Pre-session Hunches
(AVs)
:N/A
Date Summary Returned
:15 Jan
D.
EVALUATION DATA:
Viewer's Estimate
:N/A
Evaluator's Estimate
e•
E.
SESSION SUMMARY
The site has a radiating orange light or form of electricity within
a structure.
Water is contained in the area.
There is
a crack in
the wall which may be related to wires or wiring and could cause
damage.
This target appears to be one of a scientific nature which
relates
to
electrical
energies.
A
large
oblong
container
holds
substances at this
location.
This site can be dangerous
if there
is
a
leak
or
setting
off
of these
energies
into the
atmosphere.
The
target
causes
a
reaction.
A glittering
electrical
light
is
shimmering.
Approved For Release 2001/03/07
: CIA-RDP96-00789R00240041 0001-0
Table
A-l
(continued)
Approved For Release* 2a^8/QJ^«A|WJffi6-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
W
CO
05 M
II
IT
o o
o o
XX
XX
N
N
(N N
m ^
CO
CM
<N
I
I
I
I
III
II
oooo ooo
oo
r--l
rH
r—1
r—I
rHr-lrH
rl H
XXXX
X XX
XX
oooo
i>
in
i>
oo
oooo
O^CO
o
i—
I
£
•o
ft
cel
ft
p
cel
cg
P
d
O
•rl
O
•H
O
£
CG
P
•H
P
O P
rH
rH
P
P
CG
eg
V-/
d
O
s
O
ft
P
d
•H
•H
*X>
&
CG
ft
d
rH P
rH P
XS p
a
CG
a
T3
•H
P
d
m
d
CG
o
•rl
•H
•rl
P
p
P
a
P
XI
•rl
p
o
TJ
cg
CG
*n
P
d
«
•H
a
•H
rH
CG
P
bJD
4>
a
>
d
>
d
d
P
d
•rl
\ \ \ \
P
cg
43 P
p
£
P p
WJ
SH
CG
P
PK
•H
s
O
o
CG
CG
>
•rH
•H
£
ft
S3
rH
CO
rH
co
cel
ft
d
ft
CO
<§ £
OS
.4
£ £
d
a
O
CG p
TJ
XI
>
•rl
P
r"l
XI w
P
O
O
cel
f-4
CG
d
rl
£
ft
p
a
d
bj)
•H
0 P
O
CO
s
d
ft
P
CG
*H
Eh
p
d
•H
CG
d
£
cel
rH
P
m
U
CG O
b0
P
a
8 £
ft
P «H
•rl
rH
CG
a rl
P
i—
S3
d
XI
SH
•rl
33 t
d P
rH
O
o
d
d
a
P
CO
d
P
SH
p
d o
d
M
d
0 p
•rl
SH p
43 p
SH
SH P
a
H
W
d
p
o
d &
CQ
O
•H
P
d
•H
P
P H
£
CG o
•rl
O
oj
P
a
z
b£)
d
d
•-
pS
a
H
d
bl>
d
CG
rH
P
>>
P
CG
d
p 5
SH
•rl
*H
•H p
ft
O
p
CG
!zi
rH
•H p
O
d
P
CG
cel
P
a
d
X
o
d
0 n
o P
CG
SH
>
o
P
d
CG
-H
>
SH
fl
SH
P
rH B
o
3 P
P
SH
Eh
X3
M
O w
•H
CG
0 H
a
CO
rH
d
,
+2
>>
s P
p
d
CG
<C
o>
K S
W
d
ft M
dd I
d0 5 5
43o M
ft
•H
Eh
TT
CM
CO
cel
l>
l>
K0
o
o>
o
rH
rH
rH
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
Prerecorded
control
Table
A-l
(continued)
Approved For Release WfMWWA 61A4WfeW)0788R001 30021 0001 -5
CO
CO
<N
CM
CO
0Q
CO
|
i
|
o
o
o
O
O o
o
O
*rl
rH
•
•
rH
•
•
rH
•
•
i—
rH
rH
•
rH
*
*
P
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
X
•
•
X
•
•
X
•
*
X X
X
•
X
•
*H
a
a
a
d
d
d
d
d
d
P
1—
t>
o O
o
o
d
rH
t>
in
o O
o
rH
P
•
*
»
•
•
•
*
CO
LO
CD
CO
in
in
rH
d
d
fto
o
ft
d
d
o
n
£
d
>
>
CO
>
CO
•H
•H
1—
•H
rH
P
CO
P
d
P
d
O
rH
O
H
O
•H
d
d
d
d
S3
d
d
•H
a
p
p
p
•H
d
•H
H
r
P
£
o
O
d
d
LO
d
O
d
O
d
O
d
o
d
\
d
o
d
CQ
0 P
O
O p
O
CO
0 p
\ P
d P
rH P
d P
p P
d P
CO
d
d
d
\
d
d
d
o
d
d
d
p
d
d
CO
d
d
d
d
o
d
p
d
*ro
d
a
ft
d
d
o
d
d
ft
d
d
•H
n
bO
bo
d
bJO
P
ft
ft
bJD
bo
*o
bO
b0
CO
bO
bO
d
p
X
ft
X
X
P
CO
d
d
rH
rH
rH
CO
rH
rH
rH
p
rH
rH
rH
a.
ft
ft
&
ft &
d
ft
ft
ft
CO
d
p>
a
a
a
d
a
a
a
a
a
•H
•H
o
•rH
*H
Q
•rH
>
•H
•H
& &
CO o
CO
H
CO o
CO
H
CO o
CO
•M
•M
M
a
•H
S
d
-Hd
tCl
bO
£
a s
FdM
CO
ft
co\
CO
O \
CO
O O \
CO
o o o \
H w
CO ^
o o o o
ft
ft
ft
ft
M M M >
$
*
o
CO
p
ft
a
S
CO
K*i
aopd
d
O g
dO
*
K O
Cl
>> 5
ft
dod
ft
u
do
4->
£1
W>
CJo
*H
d
S
ft
dd
•
•
•
«
•
•
•
H
m
o
ft
E C
ft
ft
ft
ft
d
ft
p
p
d
w
•H
d
ft
ft
P 0
ft
£
$
ft
d
ap
d0
d
P
a
•H 3
d0
0 g
ft
o
ft
d
d
i
ft
•pH
d
d
d
d
a
P
a
ccj
ft
•H
d
a
ft
d
i
o
o
ft
•H
X P
ft
<u
ft
ft
rH
d
ft
d
d
p
d
t-
&
a
rH
w
d
•H
ft
d
o
ft
ft
a
o
P
ft «
£
ft p
ft
X
ft
o
ft
«rl
ft
d
•rH
O
ft
u
d
H
«H P
p
o
ft
d
>>
d
d
lO
d
o
a
P
ft
ft
d
i—
i
ft
0 iH
d
<
ft
ft ^
d
d
d
CO
a
i—
i
rH
d
d
>
ft
«—
d
•H
ft
d
ft
o
d
ft
ft
d
CO
<H
O
d
co
d P
ft
•rj
d
a
ft
•H
«H P
•H
•H
n
•H
ft P
d H
d
ft
ft
•H
£
rH
d
co
rH
d
co
d
d P
d
X
P
d
d
i
d
ft
w
•H
ft
P
t>>
o
b
ft
ft
a
O
d
M
a
rH
CO
CO
P
b0
ft P
b0
d
O
•H
o
d
•H
d
•H
•H
o
ft O
ft
ft
>
ft >
<C m
<
*
ft o
1>
lO
1>
i—
I
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001300210001-5
One-tailed
Table
A-l
(continued)
Approved For
-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
oi
oi
co
co
a
s
a
a
a
a
a
rP
.Cl
•H P P
P P
«H
CD
Q
W
H
&
Pi
•H
-H
O
A A
0)
+J
+J
•H
fP
*P
P
bi)
bD
>H
*H
CQ
Oh
D5
,P
rP
a>
*H P P
P
«H P
P
*H
r-1
*H P
i5
aS
h
i-t
p
T3
o
,Q
0 P
P
b
a) &
a>
o
+* h
q_j
*0
H
*ri h
\
*H
&
P
£
o
p
O
H
P
H P
O
P
.
m
p
P
TJ
rP
w
o <
P
TJ
P
T3
p
W
g
0 \
P
P
73 P
0 P
7*
fcj
aj
P
P
oi
hp ^
bj3 P
bfl
bfl
P
P
p
aj
p
i—I
*P
O
S O &
<
Jh > O
P
PI
P
O
p
oi
p
O
-p
r-i
p
P
bp
bA
P
P
i—I
*rl
O
POO
o
o
o
•H
P
P
P
a
*H
P P
o <
a o ^
i—i
O w ^
p
*3 H
oi
•H
P
H
s
-H
P
P
P
P
P
CQ
p
O
•rl
P
p P
p
P
,P
P P
P
1—
w o £
P
p
t>
CT)
>»
iH
p
,
O
P
•rl
*rl
bX)
P
O
P
r—I
CQ
O
I
m
P
Pi
O
CH
P
O
p
^
.
t
p
[Q
O
E
*rl
*rl
-P
O
rP
P
H W w
oi
«
Ph P ^
p
O P
rP
,P P
o
P
p
p
p
P
o
CQ P O
M
"P p
TJ
^
b£)
P
"P
•H
P
Pi
P
O
O
•H
,M
P
P
O
P
P
,0 P
O
O
-P
P
0 P
W
fi
T3
•rl
P
P
T3
P
PP P
£
P
Oh H
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
Random
/
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787R0007001 1001 6-8
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
r\ r'T.rnxr'-m'Tm -t-m
22 June 1974
MEMO FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT
Discussions with OTS on the SRI Project
SGI
I
1«
00B Ops Testing .
On 27 June 74 I met with
Qf OTS
r
?V16WWUh
^
hem their Protoco1 for testing one of the
SRI subjects in an
°° ^
Vle^ne
,
°f a Soviet target;
the substance of their proposal may be seen
m.the attached draft.
Though many other aspects were discussed,
the only
points made by me which touched on our basic research interests may be summar-
ized as follows: we’d like to have EEG, GSR and plethysmograph monitoring of
the. subject during the trials
(OTS felt that such instrumentation might obscure
°l
?
ith the initial trials but
a§reed to work them ^ at
a later stage
shouid there be any positive results);
the OTS personnel should prepare
a memo
d!L
^
llng alX their. own. factual knowledge of the Soviet
site before they go to
RI
.or the
tests;
in view of the subject's relative incompetence with drawings,
provision be made for him to construct models
of what he
'sees'
out of lago or
roIC
for
m
evaluation^before
th
iS
OTS^
elS^I
drawings >
transcripts,
etc, be sent
to
subject.
On 18
S
V hl
,
on the outcome of th
and myself (and others)
pared by OTS,
it
is
sufficient here to state
that:
for practical reasons! none
of the above suggestions were implemented;
though some of the details of the
subject
s perceptjmn^of the target seem impressive,
the overall results were
a?d 1 strongly urged that the scoring of the
results
t6d
i
t0 the total stimulus field
(based on NPIC photography) rather than
'
reiy °n the. subject
' s
specific
'hits’
and
'misses'.
Recognizing that
scoring on that basis would provide more valid statistics on the subject's nerf-
of
r
NPIC
6 ’
OTS f6lt that SUCh e3diaustive anal^sis could not reasonably be asked
!
Sffl's Performance in re Basic Research .
On 27 June 74 OTS was given an
advanced copy of my 17-18 June SRI trip report.
During the 18 July meeting,
in
response to the criticisms contained in the trip report
and the allusion to the
possibility of terminating the. project,
asked for more details SG
'
on our position..
After reviewing SRI's
spotty performance thus far, we stressed
a
we
ad explicitly told SRI that they had to make significant progress with
a
:t
. t °
items listed in P^a
5 of the trip report by mid-August.
stated that. he would send SRI an official letter covering those points
so
•cnau,
should termination eventually be necess ary,
our case would be well-docu-
^n
ted
;,
Xt,r
s
af? Cd ^
at
would make
a prolonged site visit
,
l'.,Lor !*e mid -August meetings with the SRI representatives in D„C. --either
to monitor the continuing research (if acceptable progress has been made by then)
or to gather evidence for termination of,
at least,
the basic research portion
of
the. project.
Other alternatives,
such as allowing SRI
a no-additional-cost
extension to complete
the basic research tasks,
were also discussed.
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787R0007001 1001 6-8
Table
A-l
(continued)
Approved For Release 2)iyf^(7(|7^(^fp|^0788R001 30021 0001 -5
sec
a
a
a
.
ft
ft
o o
X X
CM
CD
CD
a
a
P
"H
*H
O
+>
-p
•HP
rH
rH
cti
cd
cn
CD
CD
w
ftj
ftj
o
t»
>>
ctf
cd
P
pH
tH
C"
-H
|
rH
!>»
p
CO
,
P
o
co
t>i
|
TJ
tuO H
O
g
cd
o
p
e
o
p
co
-h o
ft
ra
W
w
CO
C\I
>)
[Q
.
P
>>
0 p
XJ
CO
CO
*H
ft
XJ
P
rj
P
+J
*H
O
P
-H
P
P
*H
Ch
Pi
O
co
O
H
I
CO
.H
|
P
CO
Pi
CO
O
CO
CO
O
CO
/-s
|
rH
O
0 H
O
O
Pi
O
cd
O
o
p
o
-H
o
Pi
O
ft
O
O O
ft
rP
CO
o
PI
O
^3
PPG
x x
cd
XJ
£2
-P P
O
fl
P
PH
•rl
»H \
P
P
CO
O
co
I
rH
pH
O
cd
at
O
OOP
o o
ft
O
fld
Jp
a s
Pu
« S Q
rP
CO
ft
o
,o
CO
o
m
rH
rH
Pi
rP
P
cd
•H
+->
O
P
P
*H
o
rH
SH P
•H
O
P
a
•H
P
p
CO
P
p
P
P
cd
Eh
ft
M
•H
SH
P
O
CCS
fj
§ 0
O
O ^
J0
co
co
a
-h
P
-H
g
a
bo
P
Pi
+j
g p
P
O
cd
cd U
P
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
(oF Approved For Releage 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000700110019-5 CONFIDENT TAL 6 August 197) MEMO FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT Telecon from Dr Puthoff of SRI 1. Talked with Dr Puthoff fron 1330 to 1350 hrs on this date. He gave me a run-down on some of the developments and data which he is putting into his next report (see below). He promised me that he would be through with the report this week and hoped that, after editing and art-work, etc, it would be on its way to us by the end of next week. Told him that, in addition to the regular channels, he should bring a couple of copies with him when he comes East. We'll be seeing him on 21 August and can discuss the report then if we already have a copy and, if not, can discuss it with him when he returns thru DC from Geneva on 28 or 29 August. Some of the tidbits he passed on are: a. they've identified all nine subjects but are tending now to view them only in two categories: Super Stars and Controls (with, possibly, a sub-group of the latter being 'learners'--those who seem to progress); b. they've reduced the screening tests from five to three (learning machine, OOB, telepathic drawings) and have set firm million-to-one Pea criteria for super-star status; the other two tests (EEG strobe and tortion pendulum) are still being used in later stages but were not, he says, sufficiently discriminating for screening; c. they have 'mountains of data' for us which he ig trying to analyze for this next report and he agrees that at least preliminary analysis at this point makes much more sense than waiting (as he'd planned) til near the end of the project; dad. Pat Price has gone thru his entire medical and starts his psych- ological exams on 8 August; PAMC had just called Hal before he called me to say they'd found highly untusual amounts of fluid in his brain-scan 4 (which SRI has decided to include on PAMC's statement that X-ray exposure _ is minimal--so much for our guidance); e. all other subjects are now firmly scheduled for medical & psych 6 exams and all should be completed by late September; f. they've run some mid-test neurological correlates on Price, with some possibly interesting findings--and are now factor analyzing to see if there are correlates with respect to accurate and inaccurate OOB reporting, 2. All in all, he sounded rather positive, encouraged and encouraging--but we'll know better when we see his report. Though I told him I'd deliberately refrained from calling him because I didn't want to seem harassing, I stressed to him the importance of this report and the need to ensure that it reflected accurately all that has gone on. I told him it makes no difference to us if there are 5 or 3 screening tests, or 2 or 3 groups of subjects, as long as the procedures and data are consistent and meaningful. SGFOIA3 SGFOIAS Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP46/00787R000700110019-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787(&0007001 1001 9-5
CONFIDENTIAL
•
6 August 1974
MEMO FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT
Telecon from Dr Puthoff of SRI
1. Talked with Dr Puthoff from 1330 to 1350 hrs on this date.
He gave me
a run-down on some of the developments and data which he
is putting into his
next report
(see below).
He promised me that he would be through with the report
this week and hoped that,
after editing and art-work,
etc,
it would be on its
way to us by the end of next week.
Told him that,
in addition to the regular
channels,
he should bring a couple of copies with him when he comes East.
We'll
be
seeing him on 21 August and can discuss the report then if we already have
a
copy and,
if not,
can discuss
it with him when he returns thru DC from Geneva on
2o or 29 August.
Some
of the tidbits he passed on are:
a.
they've identified all nine subjects but are tending now to
view them only in two categories:
Super Stars and Controls
(with, possibly,
a sub-group of the latter being
' learners
' --those who seem to progress);
b.
they've reduced the screening tests
from five to three
(learning
machine,
00B,
telepathic drawings)
and have
set firm million-to-one
<•<
criteria for super-star status;
the other two tests
(EEG strobe and tortion
pendulum)
are still being used in later stages but were not,
he
says,
sufficiently discriminating for screening;
c.
they have
'mountains of data'
for us which he
is trying
to
analyze for this next report and he agrees that at least preliminary analysis
at
this point makes much more sense than waiting
(as he'd planned)
til
near the end of the project;
d.
Pat Price has gone thru his entire medical and starts his psych-
ological exams
on 8 August;
PAMC had just called Hal before he called me
to say they'd found highly unDasual amounts of fluid in his brain-scan
(which SRI has decided to include on PAMC's statement that X-ray exposure
Is minimal--so much for our guidance);
e.
all other subjects are now firmly scheduled for medical & psych
exams and all should be completed by late September;
f.
they've
run some mid-test neurological correlates on Price, with
some possibly interesting findings--and are now factor analyzing to
see
if
there are correlates with respect to accurate and inaccurate 00B reporting.
2. All in all,
he sounded rather positive,
encouraged and encouraging- -but
we'll know better when we
see his report.
Though I told him I'd deliberately
refrained from calling
hinj. because
I didn't want
to seem harassing,
I stressed to
him the importance of this report and the need to ensure that it reflected
accurately all that has gone
on.
I told him it makes no difference to us
if there
are
5 or
3 screening tests,
or
2 or
3 groups of subjects,
as
long as
the procedures
and data are consistent and meaningful.
SGFOIA3
SGFOIA3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RD^-60787R0007001 1001 9-5
Table
A-l
(concluded)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
UNCLASSIFIED
<N
O
«
%
•
•
%
rH
%
•
•
*
•
*
%
«
*
*
•
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
cn
CO
%
%
•
•
X
•
•
*
•
•
*
*
*
%
•
p
£
P
o
P
a
ft
a
o
LO
ft P
0)
ft
ft
CO
a
O p
o
•H
CD
ft
cd
ft
>
p
p
p
XS
O
ft
a
ft
ft
ft
TJ
ft
•H
o
O
o
Q>
E
cd
* as
ft
p
P
p
CD
P
CD
p
P
p
P
0)
ft
w
CD
ft
ft
CO
Cd
X
l
i
O
aj
O
p
P
p
O
*H
rH
<N
O
CO
\ p
P
0)
J
rH
o
,£
*H P
P
CD
P
p
O
CD
O
cd
o
CO
O
CO
o
CO
P
•r-i
oi
bo
ft
CD
cd
(D
cd
cd
P
rQ
0)
cd
*r-j
rj
ft
P
CO
ft
,Q
rH
fQ
rH
i—
(
CO
ft
CD
0)
P
P
o
•rl
•H
CO
S A B <
CO c B A R
s A B <
Po
mn>
ftW <
CO <
ftOP
P
r£
ft
bJD
co
|
P
rH
O
rH
rP
ft
•pH
O
CQ
•"3
»
•
•
ffl s
p
p
eft
cd
P
P
>>
ft
O
ft
•iH
o
cd
ft P
p
ft o
p
P
H
rft
'O
H
r0
P
P
ft
O
P
ft
•H
O
P
•pH
cd
co p
ft
bo
ft
•H
CO P ^
P
>
O
co
CO c
P
a
a*
rH
cd
> p
•pH
o
a
p
P
ft
P
M
,P p
ffl
O
p
P
CO
O
P
<
P
Eh
CD
-H
<D
Ci
rH
UNCLASSIFIED
.1 KTTTT; *TJ
• 1 1 1
11 1K?Z ItMMMM
»] zlzim M:M tfililM1I 1M lUUilK
Release
of
effort
Approved For Release 2000/QamZ^l^RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
H5
REFERENCES
(U)
1.
H.
Schmidt,
"PK Experiments with Animals
as
Subjects,"
J.
Parapsych ^,
Vol.
34,
No.
4,
pp.
255-261
(December
1970),
UNCLASSIFIED.
2.
H.
Schmidt,
"A PK Test with Electronic Equipment,"
J.
Parapsych.,
Vol.
34,
No.
3,
pp.
175-181
(September
1970),
UNCLASSIFIED.
3.
F.
Matas
and
L.
Pantas
,
Nonmeditating Subjects
,
"A PK Experiment Comparing Meditating Versus
"
Proc.
Parapsych.
Assn.
,
No.
8,
pp.
12-13
(1971),
UNCLASSIFIED.
4.
L
Pantas,
"New Studies with Automated Testing Devices,"
Proc.
Parapsych^
Assn ..
No.
8,
pp.
47-49
(1971),
UNCLASSIFIED.
H.
Schmidt and L.
Pantas,
"Psi
Tests with Psychologically Equivalent
Conditions
and Internally Different Machines,"
Proc.
Parapsych.
Assn
No.
8,
pp.
49-51
(1971),
UNCLASSIFIED.
6.
B.
Camstra,
"PK Conditioning,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
1972,
pp.
25-27
(1972),
UNCLASSIFIED.
7.
C. Honorton and W.
Barksdale,
"PK Performance with Waking Suggestions
for Muscle Tension Versus Relaxation,"
J.
Amer
.
Soc.
Psychical
Res^,
Vol.
66,
No.
2,
pp.
208-214
(April 1972),
UNCLASSIFIED.
8 .
E
Andre,
"Confirmation of PK Action on Electronic Equipment,
j’.
Parapsych.,
Vol.
36,
No.
4,
pp.
283-293
(December 1972),
UNCLASSIFIED.
9.
H.
Schmidt and
L.
Pantas,
'Psi
J.
Parapsych.,
Vol.
36,
No.
3,
Tests with Internally Different
Machines,
pp.
222-232
(September 1972),
UNCLASSIFIED.
10.
E..
F. Kelly and
B.
K.
Kanthamani
,
Control,”
J.
Parapsych.
,
Vol.
36,
UNCLASSIFIED.
"A Subject's Efforts Toward Voluntary
No.
3,
pp.
185-197
(September
1972),
11 .
H.
Schmidt,
"PK Tests with a
J.
Parapsych.,
Vol.
37,
No.
High-Speed Random Number Generator,"
2,
pp.
105-118
(June
1973),
UNCLASSIFIED.
*
(U)
The references
are UNCLAS S IF IED
.
for books and journal articles
listed in this document
However, when they appear together, they are
classified
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
Approved For Release 2000/0
DP96-00788R001 300210001 -5
12 .
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20 .
21 .
22 .
23.
H.
Schmidt,
"PK Effect on Random Time
Intervals," Res.
in Parapsych.
1973,
pp.
46-48
(1973),
UNCLASSIFIED.
"
K.
Andrew,
"Psychokinetic
Influences
on an Electromechanical Random
Number Generator During Evocation of
"Left-Hemispheric vs Right-
Hemispheric
Functioning," Res.
in Parapsych
1974.
pp.
58-61
('1974
')
UNCLASSIFIED.
H.
Schmidt,
"Observation of Subconscious
PK Effects with and without
Time Displacement," Res.
in Parapsych 1974,
pp.
116-121
(19741
UNCLASSIFIED.
”
’
H.
Schmidt,
"Comparison of PK Action on Two Different Random Number
Generators,"
J.
Parapsych.
,
Vol
.
38,
No.
,
pp.
47-55
(March 1974)
UNCLASSIFIED.
H.
Schmidt,
"PK Experiment with Repeated Time Displaced Feedback,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
1975
,
pp.
107-115
(1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
C.
Honorton and E.
C.
May,
"Volitional Control in a Psychokinetic
Task with Auditory and Visual Feedback,"
Res.
in Parapsych.
1975,
pp.
90-91
(1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
E.
C. May and
C.
Honorton,
"A Dynamic PK Experiment with
Ingo Swann,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
1975
.
pp.
88-89
(1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
B.
Millar and R.
Broughton,
"A Preliminary PK Experiment with a
Novel Computer-Linked High-Speed Random Number Generator,"
Res.
in
Parapsych.
1975
,
pp.
83-84
(1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
“ “
W.
G.
Braud,
G.
Smith,
K.
Andrew,
and
S. Willis,
"Psychokinetic
Influences on Random Number Generators During Evocation of "Analytic"
versus
Nonanalytic" Modes
of
Information Processing," Res.
in
Parapsych.
1975
,
pp.
85-88
(1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
~
“
R.
G.
Stanford,
R.
Zenhausern,
A.
Taylor, and M.
A.
Dwyer,
"Psycho-
kinesis
as Psi-Mediated
Instrumental Response,"
J.
Amer
.
Soc.
Psychical Res.
,
Vol.
69,
No.
2,
pp.
127-134
(April
1975),
UNCLASSIFIED.
B.
Millar and
P.
Mackenzie,
"A Test
of
Intentional Versus Unintentional
PK »"
in Parapsych.
1976
.
pp.
32-35
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
C.
Honorton,
"Effects
of Meditation and Feedback on Psychokinetic
Performance:
A Pilot Study with an Instructor
of Transcendental
Meditation," Res,
in Parapsych.
1976
,
pp.
95-97
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
Approved For Release 200«®6€ft&#*DP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5
24.
25.
26 .
.
.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
R. Winnett and
C.
Honorton
Psychokinetic Performance:
Yoga,”
Res,
in Parapsych.
,
"Effects
of Meditation and Feedback on
Results with Practitioners
of
Ajapa
1976,
pp. 97-98
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
D.
J.
Bierman and N.V.T. Wout
,
"The Performance
of Healers in PK Tests
with Different RNG Feedback Algorithms,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
197_,
pp.
131-133
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
S
Hill
"PK Effects by a Single Subject on a Binary Random Number
Generator Based on Electronic Noise," Res,
in Parapsych.
1976,
pp.
26-28
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
R
S
Broughton and
B.
Millar,
"A PK Experiment with
a Covert Release-
of-Effort
Test,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
1976
,
pp
.
28-30
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
H.
Schmidt and
J.
C.
Terry,
"Search for
a Relationship Between Brain-
waves
and PK Performance,” Res,
in Parapsych.
1976,
pp.
30-32
(1976)
UNCLASSIFIED.
B
Millar
"A Covert
PK Test of
a Successful
Psi Experimenter,
Res_,
in Parapsych.
1976 ,
pp. 111-H3
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
B. Millar and R.
S. Broughton,
"An Investigation of the Psi Enhancement
Paradigm of Schmidt," Res,
in Parapsych.
1976 ,
pp.
23-25
(1976),
UNCLASSIFIED.
H
Schmidt, "PK Effect on Pre-Recorded Targets,"
J.
Amer
Psychical Res.,
Vol.
70,
No.
3,
pp.
267-292
(July 1976),
Soc
.
UNCLASSIFIED.
j. Terry and H.
Schmidt,
"Conscious and Subconscious
PK Tes^
"*th
Pre-recorded Targets,"
Res,
in Parapsych.
1977,
pp.
36-41
(1977),
UNCLASSIFIED.
R.
Broughton,
B. Millar
,
J.
Beloff
of
the Experimenter Effect and
Its
Parapsych.
1977,
pp.
41-48
(1977),
and K. Wilson,
"A PK Investigation
Psi-Based Component,”
Res
.
in
UNCLASSIFIED.
L
Brand and W.
Brand,
"Psychokinetic Effects Upon a Random Event
Generator Under Conditions
of Limited Feedback to Volunteers and
Experimenters,”
Res,
in Parapsych.
1977
,
pp.
135-143
(1977),
UNCLASSIFIED.
R.
L.
Jungerman and
J.
A.
Number Generator PK Tests
,
Jungerman,
"Computer-Controlled Random
" Res.
in Parapsych.
1977,
pp.
157-162
(1977),
UNCLASSIFIED.
OCCRCf
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 30021 0001 -5