datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
SECRET
Approved For Release 2Q$gm&R :|DIAIBQP96-00792R0001001400
NO
FOREIGN DISSEMINATION
941/CL-0013
This document contains
2 pages.
Copy No.
/
21 December
1983
CLASSIFIED BY:
CENTER LANE
Security
Classification
Guide
dated
March 1983
Declassify
on;
OADR
LTC Brian Buzby
Department of
the Army
Security Support Detachment
USAINSCOM,
902D Military Intelligence Group
Fort George
G.
Meade, Maryland
20755
Dear
Brian:
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
I thought
that
I would provide you with
a status report with
regard
to
the screening/selection task.
(1)
Our major consultant,
Dr.
David Saunders,
now has
the WAIS
results
for
6 calibrated remote viewers who were part of
our
IEEE published data base.
(2)
We also have collected
the WAIS results
for
13 other remote
viewers who are currently participating
in on-going remote
viewing programs.
We will be obtaining RV calibrations
for
these people throughout the year.
(3)
We are obtaining the results from 1300 responses obtained
during
a nation-wide RV/psychological
test
that appeared
in Omni magazine.
The psychological questions were developed
by Saunders
for Mr.
Stephan Schwartz,
the program director.
(4)
We have arranged
for
a three-fold
laboratory cooperative
effort
(SRI,
Princeton,
Mobius)
to analyze
the RV results
in
a statistically meaningful way and
to correlate
the
1300
responses with
the results
of
Saunders'
psychological analysis.
Since Saunders developed
the
"self report" questions
on the
basis
of his general knowledge
of
the PAS, we are fortunate
to have such
a large database with which
to work.
(5)
Under another program, we are modifying Dean Robert Jahn's
RV judging procedure
to fit more closely our form of remote
viewing.
The
statistical output
of
this procedure, which
is available
to us,
allows quantitative results
to be
calculated for each RV response.
This
is necessary
to allow
meaningful correlations with the results
of
the psychological
analysis
.
WARNING NOTICE
CENTER LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM.
RESTRICT DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS
CATEGORY
SRI International
333 Ravenswood Ave.
• Menlo Park, CA 94025
• (415)326-6200
• TWX: 910-373-1246
• TELEX: 334463
•
Facsimile: (415)326-5512
SECRET
Approved For Release
200^/^j^Y
iDP96-00792R0001 001 40036-3
SECRET
Approved For Release
:
l5^tfU^96-00792R000100U
NO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION
LTC Brian Buzby
Page
21 December
1983
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
(6)
We have obtained
the services
of
a psychologist,
Dr. Nevin
Lantz, who will provide us with
a detailed analysis
of Neuro
Linguistic Programming with regard
to
its validity
as
a
psychological process
and
its potential
as
an RV screening
procedure.
NLP has received
a
lot of public attention
lately,
and Dr.
Lantz will help
us determine which claims,
if valid,
might be applicable
to our problem.
(U)
Please
feel free
to contact me
if you have questions
on what we have
done
to date,
or
if
you have suggestions
for
the direction of
the
investigation.
Best regards,
Edwin C. May,
Ph.D.
Radio Physics Laboratory
ECM: lal
Approved For Release 2003/09/;
L-RDP96-00792R0001 001 40036-3
SG1J eed iin le ees ALS PTO BY hey Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140046-2 To: LTC R. Jachim 13 May 1983 subject: Additional Tasks 1, Enclosed are the materials you requested during my visit. If these are not suitable or if you require additional information, please let me know. In looking at the work schedule, it will not be possible to begin these tasks until late in this fiscal year. The work will not be completed until the end of FY'84, 2. If you are pleased with the enclosed drafts, let me know what your next step will be. We stand ready to prepare and forward an official proposal. 3, In addition to the projects in which you have indicated an interest, I am including a sheet on another topic that we here at SRI believe will be of value to you, 4, Please let me know if I can assist you in anyway. 941/CL-0001 This document contains 6 pages. Copy No. _ A roe. chap ome : TON Approved For Release N63 0S a0 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140046-2 WE ha
os above. Su (0) References: Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : : CIA: -RDP96- 00792R000100140038- 1 } “sent 27 May 1983 SUBJECT: Identification and Selection of Personnel (U) Peay A ensctt oe ae Dr. Harold E. Puthoff SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 0 ha. 0 7° a Dear Dr. Puthoff: a. Your memo, @ated 7 June 1982, subject: screening on My letter, géted 27 April 1983, subject same as Com Cc. Your ‘nemo, dated ll May 1983, subject: -“Belection/Training Task, (U) I have reviewed your June 1582 and May 1983 memos with the INSCOM Staff Psycholog#st- who is my principal advisor on this project. Based upon this initial review, I would welcome an official proposal. é (U) Information not reflected in your memo which needs to be addressed in your proposal include: a. (S/CL-1/NOFORN) Phase I: Who are. "calibrated" remote viewers? How many are we talking about? What is an "extended Wechsler" test? Where will the testing take place? How long will the testing take? Who will perform the data analysis? b. (U) Phase 2: Why were the Wechsler, Meyers- Briggs and 16 PF chosen as the instruments? What is the outcome expectation? Where will the "second group of individuals" be drawn from? CLASSIFIED BY: CG, INSCOM PECL: OADR CENTER LANE SECRET. NOT RELEASABLE T0 FoRZT GN Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00 /8aR068900140038-1 a” £
ee Approved For Release 2003 OFAC ASSTR TED 2200 too 1400381 roa . mo arm ; ¢. (U) How long to completion of the project? long will each phase last? What percentage of contract funding will be'‘assigned to each phase? (U) Another question is the apparent lack of relationship of the screening approach described in the memo of June 1982’ and .YOUK new approach as stated in the memo of May 1983?. {U) To allow sufficient time for a review of your proposal and to meet administrative requirements for fund ing in FY 83, an expeditious response is requested. wee ROBERT J. JACHIM “ LIC, MI Project Manager ae 2 INCL ASSIEI Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : a a EUs corszro0o100140088-1 “ How
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CJA-RDP96-00792R0001 001 40038-1
*
May
1983
SUBJECT:
identification and Selection of
Personnel
(U)
Dr. Harold E.
Puthoff
SRI
International
333 Ravenswood Avenue
Menlo Park, California
94025
—v-
. ^
•
'
Dear
Dr
.
Pi*fchoff:
<u)
References:
,
a.
Your memo,
dated
7 June 1982,
subject:
Screening
*
‘
b.
ify
letter,
dated
2? April
1983,
subject
same
as
above .
^
-;i
-
C.
Your
memo,
dated
May
1983,
subject:
Selection/Training Task,
(U)
I have reviewed ydur June
1982
and
May 1983 nemos with
the
INSCOM Staff
Psychologist - who .ip
my
principal
advisor
on
this
project.
Based
upon
this
initial
review,
i would welcome
an official proposal.
i
,
(U)
Information not reflected
in your memo which needs
to
be addressed
in your proposal
include:
a.
{ S/CL—1/NOFORN )
Phase
I;
Who
are^ "calibrated*
remote
viewers?
How
many
are
we
talking
about?
"
what
is
an
extended
Wechsler"
test?
Where
will
the
testing
take
place?
How
long
will
the
testing
take?
Who
will
perform
the
data
analysis?
b.
(U)
Phase
2:
Why were
the Wechsler,
Meyers-
Briggs
and
PF chosen
as
the
instruments?
What
is
the outcome
expectation?
Where
will
the
"second
group
of
individuals*
be
drawn from?
CLASSIFIED BY:
CG,
INSCOK
DECL:
. OADR
CENTER LANE
SECRET
WT RELEASABLE 10 FOREI GNJLllIOlJ'ALS
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-0079ZR0dtll001 40038-1
Approved For Release 2003/0|pQ|j^||p||g-00792R0001 001 40038-1
r
ft*
'
,
c.
(U)
How
long
to
completion
of
the project?
How
long will
e&cji phase
last?
What percentage
of
contract
funding
will be assigned
to each phase?
(U)
Another question
is
the apparent
lack
of
relationship
of
the screening approach described
in
the memo of June
1982
and
your
new approach as stated
in
the memo of
May 1983?
'"'V.
(U)
To allow sufficient
time
for
a review of your
proposal
and
to meet administrative requirements
for
funding
in FY
83,
an
expeditious response
is requested.
ROBERT J f JACE 1M
LTC,
MI
Project
Manager
*
*
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
lINCLAJS'nm
09/10
: CIA-RDP9!6-00792R0001 001 40038-1
Approved For Release 2003/08 UF ppss-00792R000100140039.0 SRI/GF-0034 CLASSIFIED BY: DT-1A This document REVIEW ON: 7 June 2002 MEN contains 1 page Copy No. A ar alt Nia “/ i \VANN international a ae, eG A al To. Lt. Col. Robert Jachim DATE 7 June 1982 FROM H, E, Puthoff, Ph.D, LOCATION. g919 E._C. May, Ph.D. SuBJECT Screening : CC: 1. As you know, an outstanding requirement, as yet unmet, is to determine how to screen for individuals that have a natural talent for RV. functioning, Attempts to date by SG1A both us and the client community are marginal, in large part because of the smallness of the samples of viewers dealt with so far. 3. As a kickoff for that task, we propose to take advantage of a target-of-opportunity. A colleague of ours has arranged to carry out a mass RV test through OMNI Magazine; a previous ESP test of the number-guessing type through the same medium brought in 18,000 samples. Learning of this, we arranged that the psychological questionnaire accompanying the test be designed by our contact, and also arranged that we shall have access to all the raw data, psychological and RV data. If you approve a screening task for FY '83, we will as one of our first steps arrange to ‘cross-correlate the data from this study, 4. The cross-correlation discussed above constitutes only a first step in developing an overall screening instrument, because by the nature of the study it depends on self-reporting by the viewers, a known weakness in psychological profiling which can be improved by behavior-measuring interview techniques in which the interviewer carries out certain timing tests, etc, Therefore, based on the data generated by the mass screening study involving self-report, a series of hypotheses would be developed which would be further refined by developing the interview techniques.- - these. of course would be applicable in the type of screening anticipated in selecting recruits for your program in the future, 5. The proposed one-two process appears to us and the consultant psychologist to provide an extraordinary opportunity to develop an appropriate screening instrument most efficiently, and therefore we anticipate that a useful product could be generated during the Wb vd Forikeeasel 2008/0991 Go20K-RDRIG2007G2R000100140039-0 SRI 2903 2/78 COA DCIT
Approved For Release 2003/0iSECISDP96-00792R0001 001 40039-0
SRI /GF- 003
This document
contains
1 page
Copy No.
^
CLASSIFIED BY:
DT-1A
REVIEW ON:
7 June 2002
to
Lt.
Col.
Robert Jachim
date 7 June
1982
FROM
H<
E>
puthoff,
Ph.D.
LOCATION G21g
E.
C.
May,
Ph.D.
subject
Screening
CC:
1.
As you know,
an outstanding requirement,
as yet unmet,
is
to determine how to screen
for individuals that have
a natural talent for RV
. functioning. Attempts to date by
SG1A
both us and the client community are marginal,
in large part because
of the
smallness
of the samples
of viewers dealt with
so
far.
3.
As
a kickoff for that
task,
we propose to take advantage
of
a target-of-opportunity
A colleague of ours has arranged to carry out
a mass RV test through OMNI Magazine;
a
previous
ESP test of the number-guessing type through the
same medium brought
in
18,000 samples.
Learning of this,
we arranged that
the psychological questionnaire
accompanying the test be designed by our contact,
and also arranged that we
shall
have access to all the raw data,
psychological and RV data.
If you approve
a
screening task for FY
’83,
we will as one of our first steps arrange to cross-correlate
the data from this
study.
4.
The cross-correlation discussed above constitutes only a first step
in developing
an overall screening instrument,
because by the nature of
the
study
it depends on
self-reporting by the viewers,
a known weakness
in psychological profiling which
can be improved by behavior-measuring interview techniques
in which the
interviewer
carries out certain timing
tests,
etc.
Therefore,
based on the data generated by
the mass screening
study involving self-report,
a series of hypotheses would be
developed which would be further refined by developing the interview techniques
-
-
these
of course would be applicable
in the type
of screening anticipated in selecting
recruits for your program in the future.
5.
The proposed one-two process appears
to us and the consultant psychologist to provide
an extraordinary opportunity
to develop an appropriate screening instrument most
efficiently
,
and therefore we anticipate
that
a useful product could be generated
during the Wp^ft^/dcH^)rlR«te®B6ll08®/C®>1ffOJSteCpRDe9^a£P^D001 001 40039-0
SRI 2903 2/78
QFPDET
SG1J To: Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140040-8 LTC Robert Jachim 7 June 1982 Subject: Screening Bob, as you know, screening and selecting potential remote viewers has received little research effort over the last 10 to 12 years. While poth Army and SRI have been somewhat successful in locating talented people, any extensive effort in operational remote viewing will require that we be able to screen an available talent pool and select the very best people, To this end, we should have some kind of procedure and methodology that will produce this talent. Halts proposal, as outlined in his memo, certainly represents a good beginning toward our stated goal. It is particularly fortunate that we will be able to begin the selection research in coordination with the Omni Esp test. It should result in a large amount of "free" data. If you think you will be able to fund this work in FY'83, and if you are interested in it we can discuss money and specifics later. Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140040-8
?*
\
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792RQ001 001 40040-8
SGI J
To:
From:
LTC Robert Jachim
COTR
Subject
:
Screening
7 June 1982
1.
Bob,
as
you know, screening and selecting potential remote viewers has
received little research effort over the
last
10 to 12 years.
While
both Army and SRI have been somewhat successful in locating talented
people, any extensive effort in operational remote viewing will require
that we
be able to screen an available talent pool and select the very
best people 0
To this end, we should have some kind of procedure and
methodology that will produce this talent.
Hal’s proposal,
as outlined in his memo,
certainly represents a good
beginning toward our stated goal.
It
is particularly fortunate that we
will be able to begin the selection research in coordination with the
Omni Esp test.
It should result in a large amount of
"free
data.
3.
If you think you will be able to fund this work in FY 83, and if you are
interested in
it we can discuss money and specifics
later.
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000 100 140040-8
Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140043-5 a7 kay L983 SUBJECT: Identification ang Selection of Personnel (U) Dr. Haroid E. Putheff SRI International $33 Ravenswood Avenue Penio Fark, California $4025 Deac Dre. Puthoff: (U) References: &. Your memo, dated 7 June 1982, subject: Secrcening vb. hy letter, Gated 27 April 1982, subject same as above. Cc. Your memo, dated ll May 1983, subject: Selection/Training Vagk. (0) I have reviewed your June 1982 and May 1963 memos with the INSCOR Stafif Psychologist who if my principal advisor on this project. Based upon this initial review, I woulda welcome an official proposal. (U0) Information not reflected in your temo which necds ta be a@duaressed in your proposal include: a. (S/CL-1/NOFORN) Fhase I: Who are "calibrated" renote viewers¢ How many are we talking about? What is an “extenced Wechsler" test? Where will the testing take place? How long will the testing take? Who will perform the data analysis? b&b. (U) Fiase 2: Why were the Wechsler, Meyers- Briggs and 16 FF chosen as the instruments? What is the outcome expectation? Where will the "second group of individuals” be urawh fron? LASSIFIED BY: CC, INSCOM DECL: OADR Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140043-5
Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140043-5 G. (U) How long to completion of the project? How long will each phase last? What percentage of contract funding Will be assigned te cach phase? (U) Another guestion is the apparent lack of relationship Of the screening approach described in the memo of June 1882 and YOuUr new approach as statec in the memo of Ray 1962? (U) Go allow sufficient time for a revicw of your propugal ana to meet adninistrative requircwents for funding in FY 63, an expeditious response is requested, ROBLRI J. JACHIM Lic, HI Kroject Manager ok. Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140043-5
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 00140043-5
t-,a
.083
SUBJECT;
Identification
and Selection
of
Personnel
(U)
Dr
, Harold
E
.
Futhof
SKI
International
333 Ravenawood Avenue
Menlo
Park#
California
94025
Dear
Dr.
Puthof £
;
(U)
References;
a.
Your memo ,
dated
7 June
1902,
subject
:
Screening
b.
Ky
letter,
dated
April
1982,
subject
came
as
above
c.
Your
memo,
dated
May
1903,
subject;
Selection/Training Task.
(U)
I have
reviewed your June
1982
and
May
1983 memos with
the
JNSCOM Staff
Psychologist
who
is
my
principal
advisor
on
this
project.
Based
upon
this
initial
review,
I would welcome
an official proposal.
(U)
Information
not
reflected
in
your
memo which
needs
to
be addressed
in
your
proposal
include:
a.
(S/CL-1/N0F0RN)
Phase
I:
Who
are
"calibrated"
remote
viewers?
How
many
are
we
talking
about?
What
is
an
"extended
Weehsler"
test?
Where
will
the
testing
take
place?
How
long
will
the
testing
take?
Who
will
perform
the
data
analysis?
(U)
Phase
2:
Why were
the Wechsler ,
Meyer s-
S
PF
chosen
as
the
instruments?
What
is
the outcome
Where
will
the
"second
group
of
individuals*
be
CLASSIFIED
BY:
CG,
INSCOM
DECL:
OADE
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000 100 140043-5
b
.
Briggs
and
expectation?
drawn
from?
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CrA-RDP96-00792R0001 00140043-5
c
* ^
Kow
long
to
completion
of
long
will
each
phase
last?
What percentage
o
will
be assigned
to each phase?
the
project?
How
f
contract
funding
c
v
Another
question
is
the apparent
lack
of
relationship
t,,e screening approach described
in
the
memo
of June
1982
and
your
new approach as stated
in
the memo
of
Kay
1982?
(U)
To allow
sufficient
time
for
a
review of
your
proposal
ui.,d
to meet
adisinist cafcive requirements
expeditious
response
is
requested.
or
funding
in PY
83,
an
ROBLRT
J. JACK IK
LTC ,
MI
Project
Manager
V
.
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 001 40043-5
. Approved For Release oodsiako JeRfRorec-00722R000100140045-3 MEMO Yor Le Robert Jachim Dates 19 May 1982 Froms Dr. He E. Puthoff, Dr. E. C. May Locations G-di¢ subjects: S-Item Proposed Projects List Cts Ag a Further comment on the items submitted for praject consideration, following is an attempt ta order by what we would consider priarity as far as vapid payoff is concerned. 1, Screening/Selections Everything is in place te obtain the best that can be expacted from testing methods, and the expecttion is for rapid payott in terms of a @ither a ugable test quickly, or uneguivocal indications as to why testing methods are ot appropriate for the area under Consideration. ae KV Jamming/Ambient ELLs Should there be a notable correlation between RV performance and ambient ELF fields, this correlation could be determined very quickly with a moderate effort, and would be of immediate use in the field as far as determining optimum viewing windows toa be used. oe Target Search: There is ample evidence in the peychoenergetics literature that various approaches to this problem have been succe@satul in the past, and therefore every evidence that the application of straightforward reg@arch methodology should provide pragregas in this area. 4 © 4, Audio Analysis: Previous research efforts in this laboratory have shown the potential for daveloping a succass®ful audia utrategy for differentiating correct fram incorrect RY responge., Since the appropriate strategy may differ from parson to person, such strategies may be person-dependent, indicating a little mare difficulty up front in aatimating the probability of immediate payote, oe Riofeedback (mare properly, Biomonitaring):s Potentially of large payorPr, this task provides the greatest uncertainty up front, as research efforts in the field Cin biomonitoring)? with regard to defining a “pgi-conducive™ or “agsiv-productive" state have yet to yield clearcut results. This area of endeavor therefore constitutes bagic RED, SRI international 333 Ravenswood Ave. * Menlo Park, CA 94025 © (415) 326-6200 » TWX: 910-373-1246 @ TELEX: 334463 ® Facsimile: (415) 326-5512 ™ Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140045-3 i ORET ee ee
Approved For Release
96-00792R0001 001 40045-3
To:
LTC Robert
j'achim
ME' HQ
Fronts
Dr.
H.
E.
Puthoff,
Dr.
E.
C.
May
Subjects
5~ Item Proposed Projects
List-
Dates
IS Hay
1993
Locations
8-219
CCs
As
a
further comment
on
the
items submitted
For project consideration ,
following
is
an
attempt
to order
by what
we would
consider
priority
as
Far
as
rapid
payoff
is concerned.
'“(..r een i ng/Selec t ion :
Everything
is
in
place
to obtain
the best
that
can
be expected
from testing
methods,
and
the expecttion
is
for
rapid payoff
in
terms
of
a
either
a usable test
quickly,
or unequivocal
indications as
to why testing
methods
are
ot appropriate
for
the
area under
consideration.
^
Jamming /Ambient
ELF:
Should
there be
a notable correlation
between
R{J Performance
and
ambient
ELF
fields,
this correlation
could
be
determined
very quickly with
a moderate
effort,,
and would
be
of
immediate use
in
the
field
as
far
as determining optimum viewing
windows
to be
used.
3.
Target Search:
There
is ample evidence
in
the psychoenergetics
literature
that various approaches
to this
problem have
been
successful
in
the past
and
therefore every evidence
that the application
of straightforward
’
research
methodology should
provide progress
in
this
area.
.r
4 "
Audio Analysis:
Previous research efforts
in
this laboratory have shown
the potential
for developing
a successful
audio strategy
for
differentiating
correct
from
incorrect
RU response.
Since
the appropriate
strategy
may differ from person
to
person,
such
strategies
may
be
person •-dependent,
indicating
a
little more difficulty up
front
in
estimating
the probability
of-
immediate
payoff.
5.
Biofeedback
(more properly.
Biomonitoring):
Potentially of
large
payoff,
this
task
provides
the greatest uncertainty
up
front,
as
research efforts
in
the field
(in
biomonitoring)
with
regard
to
defining
a
"psi-conducive"
or
"psi-productive"’ state have
yet
to yield
c learcut results.
This
area
of endeavor therefore constitutes basic
R&D.
333 Ravenswood Ave.
• Menlo Park, CA 94025
* (415)326-6200
® TVVX: 910-373-1246
* TELEX: 334463
•
Facsimile: '415)326-5512
Approved For Release 2003/09/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 00140045-3
• •**
OECRE | Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140047-1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: April 4, 1985 Dr. Harold Puthoff SRI-International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Dear Dr. Puthoff, (S/NF/WNINTEL) This letter is to notify you officially that the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command CENTER LANE Project was deactivated on 7 March 1985. Concurrent with the deactivation, the CENTER LANE resources were attached to the Defense Intelligence Agency pending final transfer action, additionally, action was initiated to discontinue the Special Access Program that protected CENTER LANE information. (S/NF/WNINTEL) Your office is authorized to retain classified material that was compartmented under the CENTER LANE Special Access Program for use in any follow on Department of Defense psychoenergetics research and development programs. The unclassified CENTER LANE nickname should not. be associated with unclassified nicknames of new program, (C) The association of the undersigned with U.S. Army Intelligence is classified CONFIDENTIAL. BRIAN BUZBY LTC, | Project Coordinator CLASSIFIED BY: CG, INSCOM DECLAS:  OADR | SW RASABLE TO FORETGN NATTONATS Approved For Release SER al 6 92R000100140047-1 wi E | WHEEL