ene Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : a SUMMARY ANALYSIS REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-79 1. (S/NOFORN) This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in compliance with a request for information. 2, (S/NOFORN) The remote viewer's impressions of the. target are provided as raw intelligence data, and as such, have not been subjected to any intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the information provided is the responsibility of the requestor. 3, (S/NOFORN) The protocol used for this session id detailed in the document Grill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated. 4. (S/NOFORN) Following is a transcript of the viewer's impressions during the remote viewing session. At TAB A is target cuing information provided the remote viewer. NOT RE lgheQ SAL Gey! land, Ui NM, NATIONALS 8R000500550001-7
ee Approved For Release 2000 /GBldaaFSTA SER AGLRI00500550001-7 A. . TIME +05 ey #14: #O1: #14: #01: #14: #01: #14: #O1: #14: #01: #14: TRANSCRIPT REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-79 This will be a remote viewing session for 24 June 1981. Mission time is 0900 hours. Test. All right #01, this will be a pre-mission briefing. I've shown you a.photograph of a U.S. Embassy in a foreign country that you have worked against before. In addition, I've shown you photos of six individuals who are employed at this embassy. During the session I will ask you specific questions about each individual. And they're numbered from one through six, from the top left hand to the right, and the bottom left hand to the right. Any questions? No. Okay. You've got 30 minutes to prepare yourself this morning. All right #01, the time is now 0900 hours. I would like you now. to focus on individual number one. Focus on individual number one and tell me should U.S. Intelligence be concerned about this individual?... Just a minute..... No, I don't get a feeling for that. I get like a, uh...-disassociated feeling for this person, but I don't get any feelings of concern. Okay #01, I would like you now to focus on individual number two. And again, the question is should U.S. Intelligence be concerned about this individual?....++ I don't get any feelings about this individual either. All right #01, individual number three. Should U.S. Intelli- gence be concerned about individual number three?..--. Get a feeling of some concern but not from a. intelligence standpoint. It's more of a characterization. I get a very.- I get a psychological instability. Get a, uh, feeling of... feeling of sternness and, uh, thickheadedness with intelligence and some reason I get a feeling of psychological imbalance. Can't expect mistakes from this personeeer. All right #01, I would like you now to focus on individual number four, individual number four. Should U.S. Intelligence be concerned about this individual?... Approved For Release 2000/08 Ore fsifpowss00s50001-7
ee aa a Approved For Release 2000/08/07 REE SPER PRINT S50001 7 #O1: I get a...two impressions when, uh, I look at this individual. First impression was picture of a Trojan honse..gift package. Second impression was close relationship .to one of the other six...» 1 think this person ought to be very careful of... can't make up my mind for sure about the..-l get feelings oF espionage with this person but I'm not sure which side... I don't understand the symbolism of the Trojan horse, that's very clear... That's all I get for this person. #14: All right #01, let's move on to person number five. number five? U.S. Intelligence be concerned about individual #Ol: First impression's a name. .Sandy, Sandra..something like that. Second's a-..impression of closeness... I don't get any worries with her though. Feeling that she might have..some, uh, pro- blems relating to people but don't get any, uh, strong feelings of concern.. #4: All right #01- #01: Getting, uh...getting visions of mountains when I see her for some reason. looks like lower Bavarian mountains.. saw cook, something to do with cooking. #14: Okay #01, let's move on to individual number six. U.S, Intelligence be concerned about this individual?... #Ol: First image is a distinct yes. See a, see relationship with individual four. She's holding, uh... just, uh, get vision of her holding fragmentary documents in mind. Memory works+> Get a strong ideological feeling about her. And that, uh, is probably the..just a minute..... Just get a criminal intent feeling. She's tied very closely to person four. just a minute. There's something else here and I'm tryin isolate it. #14: We'll wait.c«ee #O1: Get a feeling like she's already, uh, acted as a informant of some kind for U.S., for U.S., uh, effort. I suspect a, at least some degree of disinformation purpose for that. The informant business might be connected to person I can't tell who's handling who. She has the most, contacts of the group of six. That's all I'm gettin’. #14: Okay #01, I want, I'd like you now to move forward in time.. forward in time to 30 September 1981. 1 would like you to focus on these individuals and tell me if all of these indi- viduals are still employed at the embassy.recsees +20 #01: Only one I see, uh, employed in September is individual one. Individual four is going to be moved. I don't know why. And T see none of the others... 2 Approved For Release 2000/0810 Tefen atageperfors 00550001 7 uh, outside
nen a ( Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : - 500550001-7 x #14: Would it help if we took each one ata time? #01: No. #14: Okay. You say individual number four is moved? #01: Moved. #14: Can you tell me where or why? #01: That's what I'm looking at. Just a minute... I don't know why. #14: Okay. I have one final question, then I still want you to maintain your focus of 30 September 81. Do you pick up any strong feelings, any strong feelings of any of these indivi- duals under a great deal of stress or concern about ther Future at this time in September?.... +25 #01: Person six. I don't know why, I just get that... just a flip impression of individual one as well. only for an instant, went away. There may be some pressure on individual one as well, but not as much aS ON SiXsecees Uh, additional item on six. are, uh, keys. 1 don't, it's some- thing important about keys with individual six. word keys, and I'm not sure if it's code keys or door keys OF... key questions or what they are but keys, the word keys. That's all I'm getting. #14: Okay #01, I have no further questions at this time. you now to leave your focus, leave the focus of 30 September 1981, and come back to 24 June 1981, back into this room where we're doing the session. I'd like you now to take a deep breath, stretch your arms, stretch your legs. We'll pause nov while we prepare to draw. All righty, we're now ready for debrief. If you would run over the people again. #Ol: Okay. I might have some problems’ 'cause I dontt remember what I say in my sessions. #143 Okay. ‘I've got some notes here, T.can help you. Uh, on number one you described the person as having a disassociated feeling, but that you didn't have any threat to U.S. Intelligence. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 emmy POERP OSL OSS 0001-7 I.get a sanse of problem with family. I don't know if it's live-in relative or relative away. This'1l be, uh...this will be his reason for not being there. Individual one I clearly have there in September. Individual two, three...two and.three and six are not: there, I don't see them at all. Individual five may still be there, but sick. I get like homesick. like a hypochondria feeling about her too. I get, she's routinely sick for some Teason. Getting a tie in between four and six again. I don't know why, I just sense that six leaves, or four leaves, or they both leave the same Lime... That was, uh,
TN Approved For Release 2000/08 calif Gaiaradpeeifos500550001-7 #O1: #14: #013 #14: #OL: #14: Ol: #143 Ol: #14: #O1: Approved For Release 2000/08/0 Right. I, uh...that should be I had a disassociated feeling about the person. Uh...! think, uh, it would be better in the way of debrief to make some additional comments, probably. I get a strong feeling that there are a couple control people in this group here. Control people I mean, you know, that were probably under no suspicion or were just picked at random to be entered in with the group so that there can be some kind of check or whatever. And like person number two, I got, I don't know what I got about person number two, but it musta been zero. Yeah, you mentioned you had no feeling for concern, that's the only thing you mentioned. Yeah. It's like, I think person number two might be just a, uh, you know, like a...l'm not so sure about U.S. citizen or not but, you know, they're just thrown in here for the control purpose. Uh, number three you mentioned that there was some concern, but not from an Intel standpoint. Yeah, but not from an Intelligence standpoint. I have concern for this person from a psychological balance standpoint, for some reason. I don't know if that's a..result of the person being psychologically imbalanced or..a result of the..person having been psychologically imbalanced. I don't know which. I don't know how to explain that. Okay. Number four, you seemed toe have some pretty heavy symbology. Picture of a Trojan horse, which you felt related something like a gift package. Interesting thing, though...all the espionage feeling and everything I have about this person, this man..I don't have any strong negativism in that feeling. I had the espionage feeling, I had the Trojan horse, the gift package, the involve- ment in espionage and all this sort of thing, but for some reason I'm not getting a negative feeling with that. You know, it's almost as if- I'm not getting a feeling on.whose side he's on. You know? It's almost as if he might be working for us, doing it for us, that sort of thing. And in that event that he is, then I'm not getting any kind of a negative thing that he's like been rolled or anything like that. SOces Okay. Number five. I got more personality feelings about this person than 1 did anything else. Yeah, you even mentioned a name- Sandy. And, uh...I didn't get any, uh, any bad vibes about her.
a ee Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7 4 ‘ Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7 TARGET CUING INFORMATION REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-79 1. (S/NOFORN) Prior to the remote viewing session the remote viewer was shown photographs of a U.5. Embassy and of six personnel who are employed at this embassy. 2. (S/NOFORN) During the session the remote viewer was asked if USI should be concerned about any or all of the personnel shown. 3, (S/NOFORN) The viewer was then asked to move forward in. time to 30 September 1981 and determine if any of the above personnel have left the employment of the U.S. Embassy. 4, (S/NOFGRN) Attached are capies of the photographs shown to the remote viewer prior to this session. NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2000/08/07°%x. 3F(000500550001-7
SG1A Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7