datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
7 Approved For Release 2Qg@@d8A GS Hel£)00789R002200440001-9 TARGET ~ . \ OFF-LIMITS ea oa ~ 4 >, \ FENCE ENTRY BORDER = BUILDING SECURE CONTAINER PHOTINT _ . RADAR t 3 oe HUMINT ELINT UNCLASSIFIED FIGURE 3 (U) PENETRATION STRATEGIES ll UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9 spyRGHT UNCLASSIFIED it ete Ka / eee sheting Cok Wh re boo / Fane UNCLASSIFIED FIGURE 4 (U) LOCAL TARGET IN PALO ALTO 12 Approved For Release obdINGdASSLELED) 0789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9 UNCLASSIFIED CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED FIGURE 5 (U) LONG DISTANCE TARGET, THE LOUISIANA SUPER DOME 13 Approved For Release NGA SSE Bo0789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9 UNCLASSIFIED 23 R / CPYRGHT FIGURE 6 (U) COORDINATE REMOTE VIEWING, AIR SUPPORTED BUILDING AT SYLVANIA, NEAR PALO ALTO UNCLASSIFIED 14 Approved For Release SGA S28 HESER 00789R002200440001-9
SG1J SG1J Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R00250004001 2-8 onan DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20340- S-23,002/PAG-TA 111 JAN ygg5 TO: DIA Liaison Office of Naval Intelligence 4251 Suitland Road Washington, D.C. 20395-5720 SUBJECT: STAR GATE Project (94-280-0) (8) Reference: Discussions between Chief, Technolo Assessment and Support Activity and 4 DIA Rep, SG61J 12 December 1994. 1. (S/NF/SG/LIMDIS) Enclosed is project data regarding initial tasking from your office. 2. (U) Request that the enclosed project evaluation feedback sheet be completed and returned for inclusion in Activity project files. 3. (S/NF) This Activity looks forward to working with ONI on future projects. 4. U) The undersigned is the Project POC. Alternate POC is 2 Enclosures 1. Data Summaries Chief, Technology Assessment (S/NF/SG/LIMDIS) 1 Cy and Support Activity 2. Evaluation Feedback (U) 1 cy REPRODUCTION REQUIRES APPROVAL OF ORIGINATOR OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY LIMITED DISSEMINATION FURTHER DISSEMINATION ONLY AS DIRECTED BY PAG CLASSIFIED BY MULTIPLE SOURCES OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY DECLASSIFY ON OADR enenhas NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2003/0248" CA-RbP96-00789R002500040012-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
/V//
b*'
o?7
a neemnennmenen ass aaaaa Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9 @ Shoo ter (0 Mp ig be 7 wa Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/0
00300280001-9
CUING DATA
(s)
The facilitator and viewer both were provided with
a picture
of the target subject and his name,
grade,
country of origin,
and
erobable location;
In addition the facilitator was provided with the
taroet times and dates,
which were not provided to the viewer until
^appropriate portion
of
the session wherein they were required.
The viewer had targeted the subject previously,
but for
a different
set
of dates
Therefore,
one can assume the viewer knew he migh
Targeted the same U as’in the previous session, prior to beginning
this session.
?
fq'i
Both viewer and facilitator knew prior
to the session which
_
analyst would be directing the target, but since information concerning
country
of origin was provided to the viewer as a portion of the targeting
information,
this should have had no direct affec
.
3,
(S)
No other information was provided to either viewer or facilitator
prior
to the session.
dOStPH
W.
CW2
McMONEAGU
Analyst
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
; CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
SG1A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300280001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300310003-3 1 Tat, | SG1A. gou' hyd ® gta” Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300310003-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R00030031 0003-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R00030031 0003-3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300320003-2 S00! 0800hw, 1 lipril 1980 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300320003-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300320003-2
0X00
V(fyuJ/?XO
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300320003-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 SPAN (IP EHRIP 07 89R0@34 6p08—000-1 This document consists of 22 pages No. _t_ of _2 _ Copies; Series hae sakey DPR LP Speers ss sc ROR A Long-Term, Integrated, Basic and Applied Research Plan (U) (Draft) Authors: Edwin C. May, Ph.D. Wanda L. W. Luke 10 May 1991 An Employee-Owned Company Presented to: Defense Intelligence Agency Bolling AFB, Building 6000 SG1J Acton: "54 Washington, 4—0001 Submitted by: Science Applications International Corporation Cognitive Sciences Laboratory 5150 El Camino Real, Suite B—31 Los Altos, CA 94022 c/o Innovative Technology Division 311 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 360 Clearwater, FL 34619 Classified by: RFP No. MDA908—91—R-0133 Declassify on: OADR secret NOFORN 5150 El Camino Real, Suite B-31, Los Altos, California 94022 (415) 960-5910 Seattle, Tucson one sic Approved POrReesse 20000808 CHARI P9E-60789R003100060001-1
SG1B
SGI J
SGI J
SGI J
Approved For Release 2003/04/1
date:
July 1994
96-00789R0025001 8001 0-5
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
memorandum
S-64 , 094/PAG-TA
reply to
pan—T'A
ATTN OF:
-*“
subject:
STAR GATE Project
TO! PAG-1A
1.
(S/NF/ SG/LIMDIS)
Enclosed
is the project data you requested
regarding
Follow-on rasKing
is welcomed.
SG1B
2.
(U)
Request that the enclosed project evaluation feedback
sheet be completed and returned for inclusion in Activity
project files.
3.
(U)
POC for this project
is the undersigned or
They can be reached at
I
Enclosures
1.
Data Summaries
~ \Chlef ,
PAG-TA
(S/NF/SG/LIMDIS)
1 Cy
.
Evaluation Feedback
(U)
1 Cy
SGI J
SG1B
SGI J
cc:
PAG
REPRODUCTION REQUIRES
APPROVAL OF ORIGINATOR
OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY
CLASSIFIED BY MULTIPLE SOURCES
DECLASSIFY ON OADR
FURTHER DISSEMINATION
ONLY AS DIRECTED BY DIA/PAG
OR HIGHER DOD AUTHORITY
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
optional form no. io
Approved For Release 2003/04/9ffA5l/eKDP96-00789R00250018001g^^ (i|1CFR)lol „ ,
LIMDIS
5010-114
Approved For Release 2000/080%: US BaIPNP 96-00788R000300340001-2 #313 No. That's pretty much it. #66: Okay. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : 0 F88R000300340001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 TAB Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 S) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : cin nDpoe-oranronesoo4oner SS) ee — Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
Heetab/07 - CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 @) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
pproved For Releas ine IA-RDP96-00788R000300340001 -2 <3) aceite Approved For Releasg 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R00030034§001-2
Approved For Release 2000/0§/07 : IA-RDP96-0078§R0}J0300340001 -2 / vo —_ ol UNG ae AT 4 / _— / fo VA / | / Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 ©
<_* (08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001 -2 . ed _ “ / —_ Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 ‘)
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS/ORCON
Approved For Release 200^0|707>(gmiRt3p96-00788R000300750001 -7
U
I
CUING INFORMATION
S
(S) Both the facilitator and remote viewer weryoroj^ec^^lj^he
target location in geographic coordinates;
SGI A
In addition the facilitator was directed to obtain as much infor-
mation as possible on the target
site,
as well as direction to per-
sue any information available if the viewer reported military equip-
ment of any kind, particularly in regard to numbers.
The facilitator
was directed to persue the numbers question only if this could be done
without leading or cuing the remote viewer, this was accomplished.
EGRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300750001-7
C Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 (S Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 Ca) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
Approved For i 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
a BbBoved For Release 2000/08/07/4 CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2 $c? BIG STORAGE BAY Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300340001-2
SG1A Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release ie 00788R000300720001-0 SUMMARY ANALYSIS REMOTE. VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD-55 1. (5) This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in compliance with a request for information on a target of interest to USI. The purpose of this session determine the function of a target building in the vicinity of 2. (S) The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document GRILL FLAME Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated. 3, (S) At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote viewer during the session. A complete transcript of the session is available upon request. At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his impressions of the target site. At TAB C is target cuing information provided the remote viewer. 4. (S) The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by the remote viewer, and, as such, has not been subjected to any intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the informa-~ tion provided is the responsibility of the requestor. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
5RO000300720001-0 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS ow’ 19 June 1980 REPORT #CD~55, 18 Jun 80 SGIA (S/NOFORN ) 1. (U) Reference Report #CD-54, SAB. 2. (S/NOFORN) ‘Following information is provided in response to USI tasking concerning function of building near i 3 SG1A SG1A Specific collection requirement was to determine what is going on inside designated building. 3, (S/NOFORN) Source provided the following details: a. (S/NOFORN). That inside of buildihg had area of glass booths like cubicles of glass (see drawings 1 and 2, TAB B). Described them as being large, almost room size. b. (S/NOFORN) Source kept on reporting on low frequency sound/pulse but did not know origination. ce. (S/NOFORN) That very small portion of this building looks like a lab, but it is not a medical facility. Area was a mixture of 2/3 different things. d. (S/NOFORN) Source reported electronics associated with this area. Had impression that some equipment might be photographic type in nature. e. (S/NOFORN) Reported that specially trained people work here. f. (S/NOFORN) Source reported that people who work here are not the same nationality as owners of the property. Three languages spoken here. Some people serve as advice and assistance team. ge (S/NOFORN) Source reported that function carried out in building had something to do with pulsed low-frequency sound vibrations and guided, precision implements. 4. (U) Request evaluation and comments concerning this report be provided to this office NLT 2 July 1980. NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
TT ce DEERE | SECRET Approved For Release ae \(\\*1') | caine OU — papa te ooo AA RecGe ee ® Science Applications International Corporation An Employee-Owned Company SG1J ee SG1J SS Ale (reflaral Aug 92 Approved For Releasd Nab Oaks : CIA-RDP96-00789R003100200001-5 SECRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : ClA-RDP96-00798R000300720001-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
ApProvec For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00748R000300720001-0 ( Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 (2)
ApProved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-007§8R000300720001-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
wot Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 (W) 2 2 ( ae 4c gov \ “> Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 = . | pS Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 ©
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
£.88R000300720001-0 TARGET CUING INFORMATION REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD-55 1. (S) The viewer was shown overhead imagery of the target area, and, at that time, the building of interest was pointed out to him. He was asked to. access the building.and describe its interior, its function, and -to describe the type of activity that takes: place there. .2. (S) During the session the viewer was provided the geographic coordinates of the compound and asked to focus on the designated target building. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release "UNCEACSIFIED noo aso ————— “IT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING THIN AND LONG. . . WITH A NAIL HEAD AT THE SPOOL AND PIN END . . . SILVERED COLORED.” “© ¢od@® CURLED UP LEAF “A NAUTILUS SHAPE WITH A TAIL.” LEATHER BELT KEYRING “THE STRONGEST IMAGE | GET IS LIKE A BELT.” 7 US “LIKE A MINIATURE TOWER . . . SCALLOPED CAN OF SAND BOTTOM ... LIGHT BEIGE.” “LIKE A PENGUIN... GREY AND BLACK AND WHITE .. . POINTED OR SLIGHTLY ROUNDED OFF AT THE TOP ... OPEN OR POINTED AT GREY AND WHITE QUILL THE BOTTOM.” UNCLASSIFIED FIGURE 9 (U) TARGET OBJECTS IN METAL CONTAINERS 19 Approved For Release HNCLA RTE ER 50789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1 a. Viewers Eight viewers were selected for this experiment. Four were known to be good remote viewers, and four were staff members with unknown viewing ability. Each viewer contributed a minimum of one and a maximum of three independent sessions. b. Senders The senders in all sessions were either various staff members who were well known to the viewers or they were viewer’s spouses. c. Dependent Variable The dependent variable is the RMS phase shift of the primary alpha activity as a result averaged over all RS. 2. Specific Protocol Details a. Stimuli Remote stimuli consisted of an NTSC encoded blank screen with a 5-cm square, linear, vertical, sinusoidal grating lasting about 100 ms. These stimuli (DS to the sender) subtended 2 degrees in the lower left visual field of the sender. This was maintained by asking the sender to focus his visual attention on a permanent mark on the monitor. Pseudo stimuli consisted of the blank screen without the superimposed grating, and were included as a putative within-run control. b. Run Timing Figure 1 shows a schematic timing diagram for one run. No two stimuli of any type were allowed to occur within a 3-second period of each other. A stimulus may occur, however, any time within a 4.5-second window thereafter. The sender was presented with a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 15 DS occurring at random intervals within a 120-second period. In all but the first session, a random number of pseudo stimuli (i.e., random time markers with no concomitant stimuli—PS) were added as a within-run control. A viewer was never presented with direct stimuli except in locating the maximal response to the visual areas (see Section 2.c). Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/(^^!r^@lfi^|^ff^88R000300720001-0
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
19 June 1980
REPORT #CD-55,
18 Jun 80
SUBJECT:
SG1A
/ic Coordinates
I (S/NOFORN)
SG1A
1.
(U)
Reference Report #CD-54,
SAB.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
Following information is provide^i^cespons^t^JS^^
tasking concerning function^of building near
Specific
^Jg[^^^temin^!ha^^goari^r^nside designated building.
SG1A
3.
(S/NOFORN)
Source provided the following details;
a.
(S/NOFORN)
That inside of buildihg had area of glass booths like
cubicles of glass Uee drawings
1 and
2,
TAB B).
Described them as being
large,
almost room size.
b.
(S/NOFORN)
Source kept on reporting on low frequency sound/pulse
but did not know origination.
c.
(S/NOFORN)
That very small portion of this building looks like a
lab,
but it is not a medical facility.
Area was
a mixture of 2/3 different
things.
d.
(S/NOFORN)
Source reported electronics associated with this area.
Had impression that some equipment might be photographic type in nature.
e.
(S/NOFORN)
Reported that specially trained people work here.
f.
(S/NOFORN)
Source reported that people who work here are not the
same nationality as owners of the property.
Three languages spoken here.
Some people serve as advice and assistance team.
g.
(S/NOFORN)
Source reported that function carried out in building
had something to do with pulsed low-frequency sound vibrations and guided,
precision implements.
4.
(U)
Request evaluation and comments concerning this report be provided
to this office NLT
2 July
1980.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
el For Release 2000/08/07 : SESE GUC Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00789R003800200001-8
a.
5 -Z
^aaA-
Jyk3ttr*^~
hecrof
sha/$kt
krTG2uT^.
.
Ax^tytt^A
^ ^
CdoYkJ
USllfL. ftVys C&io/SV^ drr
(fr&u'jf*
yto7_
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 :fclA-RDP96J0789R003800200001-8
&£*Ut*Z&4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0 (S) ot et ( ek «e go” \ 40 po” \ Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/0
8R000300720001-0
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV) SESSION CD-55
1,
(S)
The viewer was shown overhead imagery of the target area,
and,
at that time,
the building of interest was pointed out to him.
He was
asked to access the building and describe its interior,
its function, and
to describe the type of activity that takes place there.
2.
(S)
During the session the viewer was provided the geographic
coordinates of the compound and asked to focus on the designated target
building.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300720001-0
Approved For Release 2000/83&-ReElrpP96-00789R002200440001-9 (C) may be useful to summarize what has been learned thus far about RV (see Table 2). (C) To expand the applications of remote viewing and further explore its parameters a communication experiment was attempted. The experiment involved placing remote viewers in a submersible in 500 feet of sea water and approximately 500 miles from the target sight. A series of six targets were associated with six possible communications, and at an arranged time an experimenter went to a target and a remote viewer in the submersible prepared a description of a target. The description was then compared with the list of potential targets and a choice was made as to which one most nearly resembled the viewer’s description. Correct identification of this target, which was coupled with a particular message, constituted delivering the message. Because of various technical problems, only two trials were completed and the correct message was transmitted in both. As the experiment was shielded by sea water, it was further concluded that ELF transmission was not a possible mechanism for remote viewing. The stress induced on the viewer by being underwater did not appear to degrade the quality of their remote viewing. (S/NF) The FTD, as part of their threat assessment responsibility, asked SRI to replicate a Soviet experiment where the transmission of 105 out of 135 digits was accomplished. SRI did the experiment and obtained results that were not significantly greater than chance. There are a number of possible explanations for the failure. The author’s choice is that the state of the art was being exceeded. At that time, reasonable descriptions of macro targets were being confirmed. To give very refined descriptions of much smaller objects, letters and numbers in particular, has had a history of failure (or a very low level of success). If this ability is ever used in an intelligence mode, there are more rewarding areas where it may be better applied. Some of these are shown in Table 3. (C) Remote viewing, as the name implies, is a visual task. There have been, however, several instances where signals from other sensory modalities were reported. SRI developed an experiment with an audio target and initial results suggest that remote audio perception is possible but additional experiments would be needed to confirm its strength and reliability. In some cases data reported from other sensory modalities at times have been better than visual data. 20 SECRET Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200440001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1 Pseudo Stimuli Remote Stimuli Figure 1. Schematic Timing Protocol—Single Run c. Instructions to Viewers In all sessions, the viewers were completely informed about the details of the experiments. Prior to their placement on the MEG table, they were shown the location of the RS display monitor, and were instructed to place their attention upon it or the sender during the session. For some sessions, the viewer was instructed to press a fiber—optic-coupled button when he felt that he perceived stimuli. Each button press was marked in the data record. Button pressing was retained in this protocol as part of the conceptual replication. d. Sensor-array Placement and Calibration We selected the location for the sensor array by optimizing the viewer’s response to direct visual stimuli. Inherent in this choice is an assumption that may not be valid: namely, that neurons participating in a reaction to RS are the same as those that respond to DS. The sensor locations were then marked on an acetate transparency to allow for accurate repositioning of the sensors in later sessions. One such placement (right occipital) is shown for viewer 002 in Figure 2. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1
“ ‘ Approved For Release 2000/08/08 Shee ode fevrfo1s00120009-7 SG1J MEMO Tos rr 7 Dates Li-may-83 Frog tay! Locatiangs 6-220 Sub jects Biofeedback Task for LTC RI CCy Puthote Mawenanavenvocanesnngearagnaeesunrenaneseazeneoetsonnaatanssananenanousnssaseen  vSHNDLNOEOEvONEdsUNLNOGOTILNATLATALELELIEGROOESIREOTECGD #9 DUDUSEDEDENSASORESEZORDOLCGAbePEBUGSLADINGSDCUIALEUPELSINIELIAUPEDEDESEBDEOSDSEDEDFOPAMESEODESSSOUOEOCOHDECOEOEDEAELIULELELAEDIDSOLSLEOSHANDELELSUPUDESADOBIODODOSDSesEbbUEDEFEOSeGESOS ESCO PEDO saeIEELEOPAEY)DESESLADPEDPIZsPFEFESeanas With regard to biofeedback, SRI International will provide the appropriate aquipment, facilities and personnel to accomplish the following tasks. id. Search the open literature for papers describing RV type experiments that involved physiology measurements. a Critically evaluate the papers found in (1) to determine which Cif any) physiological measurement is most Likely to have an RV correlate. Be. With vecognized authorities in the physiology field selected Fram ¢2) ag consultants, perform physiology monitoring an spangarcsupplied personnel with the RY training environment, The astimated cost for this tasks P| SGFOIA2 Approved For Release 2000/0REET EPR 9200 &8R001500120049.7