datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
p.V
-J
/-r... r.^ r“*Tv*
Approved For Release 2OOO/p»&^i^bP96 -OO788ROOO5OO^O0^
Tl
Boxes are provided
to the right of each question.
Only one box should be
checked for each question asked.
If you have any comments which you would
like to make emphasizing the accuracy of the information or with reference
to any information not generally covered in this format, please. write them
on the reverse- of this page.
Response to Tasking
Responses*
Does information provided satisfy
your intelligence collection require-
ment?
D
YES
IN PART^f
NO D
Accuracy
Geographical location (terrain, water,
river, etc.)
p
YES
IN PART $
NO n
Large scale man-made objects (docks,
silos, buildings, etc.)
O
YES
IN PART
NO O
Small scale man-made objects (tanks,
computers, antennas,
etc.)
n
YES
IN PART
fa
NO D (/&&$»})
Target ambience- (research, production,
administration,
troop movement, etc.)
D
YES
IN PART 0
NO
Activity
(nuclear testing,
CBR,
SIGINT
monitoring,
etc.)
D
YES
IN PART U
NO.ft’
Personality
(Physical, plans, actions,
traits, etc.)
D
YES
IN PART 0
NO
Utility
Please check which best describes the
T3
VERY USEFUL
utility of the information provided (in
view of what is known at this time, un-
D
USEFUL
derstanding that additional information
could raise or lower such an interim ass-
MARGINAL
essment at a later date)
:
-
D
none-
;
ft
CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT
THIS TIME
*YES - indicates a full agreement with what is known to be fact about the
target.
NO - indicates a total lack of agreement with what is known to be
fact about the target.
Approved For Release 2000/08^i^1A%]f®P96 -00788R000500320008-5
V.
-
-./•
,•
Stf
l U
rrv* , b i?
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CiA-RD^96-00788R000500320008-5
Is additional tasking required?
(If yes, please write what that
tasking
is on the back of the form)
Did the attached information add to
information, derived from other intell-
igence sources?
Did the attached information aid in tasking
other intelligence resources by providing
targeting information?
O
YES $
NO
P
YES ^ NO
yes a
N0
SG I A
(Signed)
SIGNATURE
“
'
•
••
1 y-
—***
*
"
(Printed)
NAME,
GRADE
(Printed) TITLE,
or OFFICE
Approved For Release 2000/08‘/07
: CIA-R6P96-00788R000500320008-5
Approved For Release 6-00788R000500370001-7 TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY | REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-02 . 1. (S/NOFORN) Source #11 reported presence at the designated coordinate of an area consisting of a plain or valley com- prising an access route. Hills were observed in the distance — which overlooked the valley or platn. A large city was obser- ved in the distance. In the (apparent) center of the valley or plain was observed a crossroad type intersection of two hard surfaced roads. 2. (S/NOFORN) Debriefing cancelled after 10 minutes duration. NOT RELEASABLE 10 FOREIGN NATIONALS Fae in Approved For Release 2@ awit 4 ion 0-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
( Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 ~ = 5) A) “A “Na } Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 S)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
‘oroved For Release 2000/08/10 : CARD Fe _ ain a Final Report- December 1986 Covering the Period 1 October 1985 to 30 September 1986 L Oo loin REMOTE VIEWING EVALUATION TECHNIQUES (U) Internet Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003800440001-2
p-00788R000500370001-7 TARGETING DATA REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-02 . 1.. (S/NOFORN). Prior to the session the viewer was told that he would be provided with a geographic coordinate and specific time windows to the target. He was told that his job would be - to describe the target area and report on target area activity during the designated time windows. 2. (S/NOFORN) At the beginning of the session the remote viewer was provided the following space/time coordinate: SG1A 021400 November 1980 (local target time) 3. (S/NOFORN) During the session the viewer was asked to elab- orate on his descriptions as directed by the Control Analyst. BOT RELEASABLE 10 FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2 : P96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/0 ry 2 : 31)k96-00788R000500370001-7 CONTROL ANALYST COMMENTS 1. (S/NOFORN) Prior to the sasston, the interviewer was pro- vided the following information for targeting of #11. a. (S/NOFORN) Targeting DatapGlA (1) Move to geo. coordinates :i-_—nnn (2) Access the target area at 021400 Nov 80, local target time, (3) At the target, move in time increments of 3 days each from: (a) 021400 Nov 80 (b) 051400 Nov 80 (c) 081400 Nov 80 (d) 111400 Nov 80 (e) 141400 Nov 80 (f£) 171400 Nov 80 b. (S/NOFORN) EET: (1) Acquire general target description. (2) Determine/deseribe activity level changes in target area. 2, (S/NOFORN) The interviewer provided the viewer only the geo- graphic coordinates and start time coordinate at the beginning of the session. The remainder of the above data was for the pur- pose of in-session guidance of the viewer by the interviewer. 3. (S/NOFORN) Session DC-02 was cancelled based on the remote viewer's desires expressed after session start. The remote viewer stated having heavy overlay from a preceeding session which had been interviewed by (#11). Although #11 was, during this session, being targeted against a different geographic coordinate, the similarity in targeting method, and (#11)'s knowledge of the ID of the Control Analyst caused (#11) severe analytical problems after receipt of the geographic coordinates from the interviewer. Based on #11's expressed desire, the session was terminated after 10 minutes duration. A, (S/NOFORN) In-session targeting: At +10 minutes after ses- sion start, the Control Analyst communicated the following to the interviewer. "Okay, we can stop the session." SGFOIA3 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATION. KENNETH V. BELL, . CIAJRDP¥6-00788R000500370001-7 Control Analyst
Approved For Release^^gJ^|^g^6-00788R000500370001-7
TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY,
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION DC-02
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Source
#11
reported presence
at
the designated
coordinate
of
an area consisting
of
a plain
or valley
com-
prising
an access
route.
Hills were
observed
in
the
distance
which
overlooked
the valley
or plain.
A large
city was
obser-
ved
in
the
distance.
In
the
(apparent)
center
of
the valley
or plain was
observed
a crossroad
type
intersection
of
two hard
surfaced
roads.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
Debriefing
cancelled after
10 minutes
duration.
ROT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2
-00788R000500370001 -7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7 S)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
i
TAB
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003501040005-4 PROJECT SUN STREAK ED eer ECT ACME: DATE OF SESGIONs 28 AUG 89 DATE OF REPORT: 29 AUG oF START x LES IMD: 1425 METHODOLOGY s SOL. SR TDENTIFIERs O84 Ls CS/NEF/SE> MISS TON: Determine and degeribe tha currant location SG1A we COL COL ah» "a Me (S/NF/SE) VIEWER TASKING: Viewer OLl tasked with requirements crafle@ctecd im Para 1. CS/NF /SED COMMENTS: No dre l emer Tc ons will be conducted to det exact current location and ta further of the informant who is apparently phar” ¢ ! rear nated. Additional pergoanality °e the reported role ality. A Summary of Information ig attached to thig 4 (S/ME /SED a EVALUATE CN (FIED BY: DA (bT) “LASSIE Ys CADR Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003501040005-4
Approved For Release
-00788R000500370001-7
TARGETING DATA
REMOTE VIEWING
CRV)
SESSION DC-02
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Prior
to
the
session
the viewer was
told
that
he would be 'provided with
a geographic coordinate
and
specific
time windows
to
the
target*
He
was-
told
that
his
job would be
to
describe
the
target
area
and report
on
target
area activity
during
the designated
time windows.
.
was
(S/NOFORN)
At
the beginning
of
the session
the
remote viewer
provided
the
following space/time
coordinate:
SG1A
021400 November
1980
(local
target
time)
3.
(S/NOFORN)
During
the
session
the viewer was
asked
to
elab-
orate
on his
descriptions
as
directed by
the Control Analyst.
SOI RELEASABLE 10 FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2Mm3M\ &flMRbP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500370001-7
Approved For Release 20'
8 \ (U-.
-00788R000500370001 -7
CONTROL ANALYST
COMMENTS
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Frlor
to
the
session,
the interviewer was
pro-
vided
the
following information
for
targeting
of
#11.
a.
(S/NOFORN)
Targeting Data?G1A
coordinates
(2)
Access
the
target
area
at
021400 Nov
80,
local
target
time
.
(3)
At
the
target,
move
in
time
Increments
of
days
each
from:
(a)
021400 Nov
(b)
051400 Nov
(c)
081400 Nov
(d)
111400 Nov
(e)
141400 Nov
(f)
171400 Nov
b.
(S/NOFORN)
EEI:
(1)
Acquire
general
target
description.
(.2)
Determine /describe
activity
level
changes
in
target
area.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
The
interviewer provided
the viewer
only
the
geo-
graphic
coordinates
and start
time
coordinate
at
the beginning
of
the
session.
The
remainder
of
the
above
data was
for
the pur-
pose
of
in-session guidance
of
the viewer by
the
interviewer.
3.
(S/NOFORN)
Session DC-02 was
cancelled based
on
the
remote
viewer’s
desires expressed
after session
start.
The
remote viewer
stated having heavy
overlay
from
a preceeding
session which had
been interviewed by
(#11).
Although
#11 was,
during
this
session,
being
targeted against
a different
geographic coordinate,
the
similarity
in
targeting method,
and
(#11) ’s knowledge
of
the
ID
of
the
Control Analyst
caused
(#11)
severe analytical problems
after
receipt
of
the geographic
coordinates
from
the
interviewer.
Based
on
#ll’s
expressed
desire,
the
session was
terminated after
10 minutes
duration.
4.
(S/NOFORN)
In-session
targeting:
At +10 minutes
after
ses-
sion
start,
the
Control Analyst
communicated
the
following
to
the
interviewer.
"Okay,
we
can
stop
the session."
NOT RELEASABLE 10 FOREIGN NATION.
Approved Fo
SGFOIA3
KENNETH
V.
BELL,
rCIAJRDP88-00788R000500370001 -7
Control Analyst
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00789R003700460003-9
CoincG.p'te
^3)
Deuced ColCM
rcr/fe^ /
bru'shzT-
(?)
Q c
, cotrcCy
®
Thau,
AJyBM CvrvyiJlMX
- /Zen-jOsizd.
-Uz-b-j
otv\
'
'{^<X'(<^y
(_/0
if
*
l/^-&
§
(§>
^crectr)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00789R003700460003-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00789R003501 050002-6
WARN I MB
SECRET/NOFORIM
PROJECT SUN STREAK
NOT' I CE s
I NIELLI BENCE SOURCES AND METHODS
INVOLVED
PROJECT NUMBERS
8933
DATE OF SESSIONS
SEP
START
s
METHODOLOGY*
SOLO
SESSION NUMBERS
DATE OF REPORTS
SEP 89
ENDS
V I EWER
I DENT I F I ER s
O 1
(S/NF/SK)
MISSIONS
Determine and describe the nature
of
activity at
a geographical
location represented
by Encrylted
Coord i nates 8589 13/450807
.
2 .
(S/NF/SIO
VIEWER
TASKIIMBs
See Para
1,
above.
3.
(S/NF/SK)
COMMENTS s
No inclemencies noted.
A Summary
Information
is attached
to this
repot’ L.
4.
(S/NF/SK)
s
EVALUATIONS
HANDLE VIA SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
SECRET/NOFORIM
CLASSIFIED
DECLASSIFY
BYs
D I
A
OADR
(DT)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00789R00350 1050002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500400001-3
TAB
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500400001-3
P96-00788R000500400001 -3
CONTROL ANALYST
COMMENTS
REMOTE VIEWING SESSION D-94
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Prior
to
the
session,
the
interviewer was
pro-
vided
the
following information
for
targeting
. of
#27.5:
SG1A
(S/NOFORN)
Geographic
coordinates
I^^^^Hwith directions,
"Access
the
target
at
these
coordinates".
b.
(S/NOFORN)
Acce-s
the
target
at
201300 hours
October
1980,
local
target
time.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
Prior
to
the
session,
the
interviewer was
pro-
vided
the
following
information
for
in-session guidance
of
#27.5
a.
(S/N0F0RN)
Provide
a general description
of:
(1)
area,
and
(2)
act ivity
at
the
target
b.
(S/NOFORN)
Move
in
time
in
three
day increments
to
determine
changes
in activity level
(if
any)
.
(1)
201300 October
1980
(session target)
(2)
231300 October
1980
(3)
261300 October
1980
(4)
291300
October
1980
3.
(S/NOFORN)
In-session
targeting:
During
the
session,
the
control analyst provided
the
fotlowing guidance/direction
to
the
interviewer
at
the approximate
times
indicated:
a.
+10 min:
"Okay,
we
can
go
to
activity now."
b.
+15 min:
"Have
(#27.5)
focus
on
one
of
the military
units
at
his
discression,
then move him through
time."
c.
+16
min:
"Have
(#27.5)
stay with
the
SP
guns,
don't
let
them disappear."
d.
+18 min:
"What
is
the
character
of
their
activity?"
e.
+19 min:
"Never mind."
(Referring
to
last
task)
f.
(no
time
record):
"Okay,
(#14)
have
(#27.5)
work
on
that,
that's very
important."
Approved For Release 2OOOiWJ0|^y|\|^|)h 96-00788R000500400001 -3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
8R000500400001 -3
g.
(no
time
record);
"Have
(#27.5)
describe
the
feelings
that would have him
say
it
is
a manipulative move."
h.
(no
time
record):
"Have
(#27.5)
examine
the uniforms
and
attempt
to
identify
them."
i.
+30 min:
"Have
(#27.5)
focus
his
attention
on
the
leader's primary
concern
at
this
time."
j.
+35
min:
"Have
(#27.5)
envision
a
thirty day bargraph
from 291300
October
1980,
and
determine
if
the
guns
return
to
their
unit
installation.
k.
+40 min:
"Okay,
you
can bring
(#27.5)
back now."
SGFOIA3
Control Analyst
Approved For Release 2000/08;
0788R000500400001 -3
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200450001-8 13 those with significant results had, on average, two and one-half times larger sample sizes than those with nonsignificant results. Thus, large values of n impart considerably greater "power" to the analysis. Power is, essentially, the probability that the experiment is going to succeed. (This concept of power is now being taught at the graduate level in statistics.) Table 2 illustrates how power increases with increasing n. At least one of the critics present argued that there is no correlation between sample size and the probability of obtaining a significant outcome, but Utts refuted that claim. It was agreed that the spread of data -- for example, one or two "outliers" (data points far outside the general cluster) -- can greatly weaken the correlation. The statistician recommended that parapsychologists stop focusing on the arbitrary, "sacrosanct" RB <.05 and begin focusing, instead, on more meaningful measures such as estimating the magnitude of the observed effect, looking for consistency, and studying patterns across many studies. Meta-analysis is a way to obtain much larger sample sizes and "hits." In an analysis of ganzfeld psi studies with hit probability of .25 but which were nonsignificant (and thus “failures"), combining the studies gave ap of .02 ("success"). This recommendation met with general agreement. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200450001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200450001-8 14 TABLE 2 "POWER" AS A FUNCTION OF SAMPLE SIZE FOR DIRECT HIT GANZFELD ANALYSIS WITH CHANCE p=.25 © Power iiue_p n=10 n=100 .30 047 29 33 .073 54 40 166 £94 .50 .377 .9998 ( = .02) ( 04) Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200450001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002400870001-0
SESSION INFORMATION
A.
TARGET DATA:
Task/Target No.
Session No.
B.
PERSONNEL DATA:
Source No.
Monitor's No.
Beacon/ Sender No.
C.
SESSION DATA
I
Date Task Received
Session Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Method Used
Aids/Distractions
(Pis)
Pre-session Hunches
(AVs)
Date Summary Returned
D.
EVALUATION DATA:
Viewer's Estimate
Evaluator's Estimate
E.
SESSION SUMMARY;
The target square
is
-
B.
Note:
I
would
write
down
the
coordinates
and
allow
the
subsequent
ideogram
to
develop.
Upon
the
completion
of
the
ideogram,
I would then look up at the target sheet and "look"
for
a color differentiation on the sheet.
Today,
the specific square
was illuminated by a small, bright white light reminiscent of that
from a doctor's penlight.
93-162-P
049
NA
MS
10 FEB
11 FEB
1105
1117
CRV
Life decisions; Monroe
None
11 FEB 93
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002400870001-0
i
n i
Approved For Re^^|^i^7/(p|9:
l|fe-RDP96-00788R001 500040003-0
RR
RR
ssss
QSILSOZ
JUL
7fl
DA LJASHDC//DfUriI-TSH//
DIA
U ASKDC//DT //
CDRDARCOM
ALEXANDRIA VA//DRCDE//
CDRAMSAA
APG MD//DRCSY-DD//
CDRMXA REDSTONE
ARSENAL AL//DRDMI-YE//
SEC
R
£
T/NOFORN
SUP JECT
:
ISSUANCE
OF
UNCLASSIFIED NICKMAME~~GRILL FLAHE
CU>
IS /NOFORNJ
RECENTLY INCREASED HIGH LEVEL INTEREST
IN MILITARY
PARAPSYCHOLOGY /REMOTE
VI CUING
IPY/RV3-,
ALONG WITH INHERENT
SENSI-
TIVITIES,
NOU
U ARRANT USE
OF
AN UNCLASSIFIED
NICKNAME*
THE
UNCLASI
NICKNAME GRILL
FLAME WILL
REPLACE
ANY
OPEN
REFERENCE
TO
US
ARTY
'EMENT
IN PY/RV RESEARCH ,
EXPERIMENTS,
APPLICATION,
ETC
*
THE
ACT
OF
US
ARMY INTEREST
OR UORK
IN PY/RV
IS
CLASSIFIED SECRET
NO FORM.
FROM
THE
US
ARMY STANDPOINT,
A STRICT NEED-TO-KNOU
CAVEAT
N 0 1!
OPERATIVE IN
ANY SITUATION INVOLVING
PY/RV*
XGDS-S,
DEC
suns
*
A J
!
-
STCNCR/D AMX--ISH/5P11M/3 JUL76
SAVE - 510-7?
^C/L
HASS EL
L-
P. ARKER/D AMI-IS
;
N
r
: 'T if*
"ft
. J
• vr
v,L
* *«. iff mm it p
a? 8
a
Approved For Release 2005/03/09
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 500040003-0
Rn 9 EI, SRR lt A AZT RE NI BE RI RN Approved For Release 2001/03/07 6 Inf P96-00788R001500090019-8 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF FOR INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20310 FEPLY TO ATTENTION OF DAMI-I1SH 4 OCT Ig: SUBJECT: Memorandum of Agreement (U) Commander USA Intelligence and Security Command Arlington Hall Station Arlington, VA 22212 Sa Ll. (S/CL-2/NOFGRN) Reference memorandum, INSCOM, LAGC, 26 Sep 84, subject: Memorandum of Agreement, Transfer of INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) to DIA (S/CI.-2/NOFORN). 2. (U) Reference proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is approved. . 3. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Request you consider the inclusion of some detail on the procedure to be followed in transferring personnel to DIA. INSCOM may detail the individuals invclved for up to one year to allow time for DIA to identify spaces. Once such spaces are available, the detailed personnel may be given a Permanent Change of Station. tt DIA desires a change in authorized strength to allow for immediate PCS reassignment, they may apply for it through JCS. OACSI, DA will support such a change ia status if the subjecc becomes an issue, WILLIAM E. ODOM Ligutenant General, USA ACatS for Intelligence Classified by Cdr, INSCOM Declassify on; OADR BLE TQ PR EAR 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96- 00788RO01 5p OOS TE BILE To aaa Pe ; oe EE UO OMAR CAORY
SG1A Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500540001-8 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500540001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002600230002-7 SECRET PROPOSED OUTLINE ODT-S_ PROGRAM - FY 1992 I (U) PURPOSE: This report identifies key activity and major milestones for the FY 1992 ODT-S program. II (U) BACKGROUND: The FY 1991 and FY 1992 Congressional language will be summarized, to include major objectives and specific requirements. III (U) PROGRAM ACTIVITY: This section will be organized according to major activity areas as follows: (1) foreign assessment; (2) external research support; (3) in-house investigations; (4) data base systems/activity; and (5) personnel activities. 1. (S/NF) SUMMARY: This summary will highlight the primary focus for 1992 and will summarize the key actions identified in later sections. At this point, it appears that SG6A primary focus will be on research support, foreign assessments, SG6A and proficiency evaluation projects. _Some key areas for improvement during FY 1992 include: a a ° identifying methods for improving SG1B data quality for a @ investigations (proficiency, operational); (3) implementing a comprehensive data evaluation approach; (4) implementing unit data base entry procedures. SECRET /NOFORN Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002600230002-7
0, | Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500140005-7 “USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 ployed in the project). be Technologies to be employed. (List the generic technologies to be em c. Type of population involved. (List the subject population to be ob- served). 8. Status. (State what has been accomplished or published in the proposed area of Study and describe how this project will relate to, differ from and/or advance that which has already been accomplished). 9. Bibliography. (List all references used in preparing the protocol). 10. Authority. (Cite the specific authority for, the INSCOM to engage in this project. Indicate date of approval, and if not yet approved, indicate specific approval authority needed for this project. Identify any POC in approval au- thority's organization with whom coordination has been effected. | Section III PROTOCOL PLAN ll. General approach. a» (Qutline expected accomplishments in sufficient detail to show a clear course of action). b. (Include discussion of the technological validity of the proposed re- search procedures). ; ¢. (List the chronological steps to be taken). 12. Project subjects. (Give as a minimum the information below). ae Number of subjects. (Indicate the total number of subjects expected to complete the study). . b. Age range. Ce Sex. d. Inclusion criteria. (State specific and detailed reasons for inclusion of subjects by class, or individually, as appropriate). ee Diagnostic criteria for entry. f. Evaluations before entry. (Include any physical or psychological exam- inations, medical history, etc., which is to be done on each subject before entry into the project). B-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500140005-7
Approved For Release 2005/1
P96-00788R001 500040003-0
IACG
SUBJECT:
CENTER
LANE Mission Statement
(U)
d.
(U)
Letter,
IA0PS,
Mar
83,
subject:
Letter
of
Instruction
- Project
CENTER
LANE
(U)
(TAB
D)
.
e.
(U)
DoD
Directive
5240. 1R
,
Procedure
13,
Dec
82;
AR
381-10,
para
2-18;
and
Code
of
Federal
Regulations,
Part
46,
"Protection
of
Human Subjects"
(TAB
E).
2.
( S/CL-2/N0F0RN )
CENTER
LANE
is
the
compartmented
Special
Access
Program
within
the
U.S.
Army
Intelligence
and
Security
Command
(INSCOM)
that
develops
and
applies
psychoenergetics
in
intelligence
collection
and
counterintelligence
operations.
The
INSCOM CENTER
LANE Project
(ICLP)
is
a
follow-on
to
earlier
INSCOM
participation
in
the
joint
services GRILL
FLAME
program
(TABS
C
and
D).
3.
( S/CL-3/N0F0RN )
The
ICLP mission
is:
a.
( S/CL-3/N0F0RN )'
To
conduct
intelligence
collection
and
counterintelligence
operations
using
all
applicable
psycho-
energetic
processes.
b.
( S/CL-3/N0F0RN )
To
train
selected
personnel
in
state-of-the-art
psychoenergetic
intelligence
collection
and
counterintelligence
techniques.
c.
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
To
expand
the
operational
capabilities
and
training
beyond
the
confines
of
information
collection’ into
the
field
of
psychoenergetic
communications
and
psychokinesis.
The
ICLP
will
conduct
specialized
intelligence
collection
operations
in
response
to
INSCOM,
departmental,
and
national
intelligence
needs.
4.
( S/CL-3/N0F0RN )
CENTER
LANE
activities
will
be
conducted
IAW established
and
approved
protocols
(TAB
B)
and
applicable
DA
and
DoD
regulations
governing
experimentation
on
human
subjects
(TAB
E).
The
ICLP
will
coordinate
its
activities
with
DAMI-ISH,
OACSI
,
HQ,
DA
which
is
the
HQ,
DA
focal
point
for
psychoenergetic
activities
within
DA
(TAB
A).
5.
( S/CL-2/N0F0RN )
This
letter
is
the
authority
for
the
ICLP
to
develop
and
apply
psychoenergetics
to
support
the
INSCOM
mission.
It
confirms
Verbal
directives
issued
in
connection
with
reference
lc
(TAB
C).
Incl
as
VW. SUWL
}T
N .
STUBBLEB
"Ma
ALBERT
Hi.
STUBBLEBINE
III
Major General,
USA
Commanding
Approved For Release 2005/03
96-00788R001 500040003-0
NOX RELEASABjuIS 10 FOREIGN NATIONALS