; SGApproved For Release 2808/08F1G sICVAERISP96 -00792R000500230003-8/3 /g z and comet. With gerd T Goramete'® ‘ oy have Onn, / / rowwlam we a onan av seven ia on EM — awgegneas cat | pads “LW os At ti ont | | 4, ahl Ta Informational Interaction of Isolated Systems Without Energy Transfer . 92A50046 Unknown city - USSR Unknown in Russian Unknown (Unknown Pub Date) Unknown pp 341-357 [Article by R. F. Avramenko, V. I. Nikolayeva, and V. N. Pushkin [Text] I. Problem of the information component of biofield interactions. A special feature of biofield interactions is the transfer of information from one biofield structure to another. Two types of relationship can be articulated for structures of that kind that effect the process of information transfer. One type of structure is associated with interactions within a system, such as the brain. An example of such a biofield interaction could be instantaneous -- in the terminology of psychology, simultaneous -- recognition. That recognition of very familiar objects suggests the interaction of a biofield model of an impression that comes from without and structures that were previously formed and are models of already perceived objects. Resonant contact of that sort produces the effect of virtually instantaneous drawing on past experience of a needed reference and can considered the mechanism underlying simultaneous recognition. Processes associated with thinking and with problem solving can be placed in that category of informational interactions between systems that are spatially isolated from each other. In the course of mental activity, the individual is known to create for himself something new, and that new semantic system usually enables the individual to solve a complex problem facing him. As numerous psychological studies show, the principal language the individual uses in his thinking is the language of systems of relationships between objects. If one approaches that psychological reality from the standpoint of the formation and work of biofield structures, then two components can be articulated in a system of relationships — certain biofield equivalents of objects, and the stable field interactions of those equivalents, interactions that are the equivalents of the interactions between the objects. In analyzing a given problem situation, the individual constructs a model of that situation that consists of, once again, the equivalents of the elements that make up the problem, plus the FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
telepathy Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY interactions between those equivalents. A good example of how the model of the situation is constructed is the process that takes place in the head of a chess player when he is analyzing his position on the chessboard. When he considers his position, the chess player perceives the pieces as functional points of sorts that have given properties of movement. In comprehending those properties of movement, he constructs a system of relationships among the pieces that become the basis of the functioning of his game strategy. It’s not difficult to see that that process -- just like the process of instantaneous, simultaneous recognition that we alluded to -- presumes, of necessity, the existence of biofield interactions: the relationships constructed in the analysis of the situation absolutely must interact with the relationships that constitute the content of the chess player’s experience. Only on the basis of the realization of past relationships can the semantic system of a new Situation develop. Thus, analysis shows that the resonance between biofield structures js also a very important aspect in an individual’s thinking. But in that context, it is not a resonance of representations of a single specific object that takes place, but a resonance of systems that include certain field equivalents of objects and of the relationships among them. The exchange of information between completely isolated biological objects can be considered _ another type of informational biofield interaction. An example of that sort of interaction is S when information that is not encoded in known languages specially designed for fer of information is transmitted from one individual to another. née Wan As a great deal of the literature shows, those sorts of bioinformational interactions can involve the transfer of the most varied of types of psychological manifestations. With telepathy it is possible to convey an action, the image of an object, a meaningful symbolic structure, or an emotional state. That means that in that kind of bioinformational contact, there is an interaction of biofield systems of various levels and modalities of the brains of two individuals who are separated from each other. All those types of biofield interactions, in which information is transferred from one system to another, are characterized first and foremost by the fact that the transfer of information involves no direct energy expense. Of course, each of the biofield systems that are associating with each other needs some amount of energy for its very existence. It’s also probable that the features of the information exchange between the systems -- the clarity, the efficiency, and the so-called capacity of the exchange -- are associated with the energy characteristics of those systems. The process itself of informational interaction, unlike known hardware systems, does not require energy. In that context, the problem arises of identi the physical laws that would enable one to undertake the analysis of the informational interaction between spatially separate systems that a ne ne een ene ‘does not require any expenditure of energy for its. existence. Later, it will be shown that there already exists in modern physics the theoretical and experimental data that enable us to take up an examination of just such an energy-free transfer of information. Approved For Release 2006/08?F5!CE¥A RDP YE_00792R000500230003-5