datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
SG1J SG1B Approved For Release 2003/0 Gleltiais Sih RDP96-00791R000200290001-5 DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20340- 5100 $-29850/PAQ-4A MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 16 get . (498 3a1| ATTENTION: ORD,[ = sd SUBJECT: Transfer of Project STAR GATE Files (U) Reference: Phonecon, 10 Oct 95, betweenl_——=d|'séPAQ-4A and{ SG1I Independent Contractor, CIA/ORD. 1. (C) Enclosed is the requested Files of log reflecting the contents of 38 boxes of Project STAR GATE data that was forwarded to your Agency ina transfer *of function in July 1995. 2. a The ae of contact for this action is ome 4A, at SG1J FOR THE DIRECTOR: SG1J 1 Enclosure Project STAR GATE Files Log (S/NF) 1 Cy Colonel, USAF Chief, Office for Force. Modernization UPON REMOVAL OF ENCLOSURE(S) THIS DOCUMENT BECOMES CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFIED BY: DIA/PAQ-4A DECLASSIFY ON: OADR <n6iGHiciess NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200290001-5
Approved For Release 2003/Q4y,^^A-RDP96-00791R000200290001-5
defense intelligence agency
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20340-
5100
S-29850/PAQ-4A
MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE
ATTENTION :
0RD,
|
SUBJECT:
Transfer of Project STAR GATE
Files
(U)
U
Qtt
Reference:
Phonecon,
10 Oct
95,
between l~
~1 PAQ-4A and
Independent Contractor,
CIA/ORD.
sail
SGI
I
1.
(C)
Enclosed
is the requested
files of log reflecting the contents of 38
boxes of Project STAR GATE data that was forwarded to your Agency
in
a
transfer^ function
in July
1995.
i.
2.
(U)
The
po int of contact for this action
is
PAQ-4A,
at
FOR THE DIRECTOR:
Enclosure
Project STAR GATE
Files
Log
(S/NF)
Cy
Colonel, USAF
Chief, Office for
Force
Modernization
SGI J
SGI J
UPON REMOVAL OF ENCLOSURE (S)
THIS DOCUMENT BECOMES
CONFIDENTIAL
CLASSIFIED
BY:
DIA/PAQ-4A
DECLASSIFY ON:
OADR
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2003/04/18
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000200290001-5
Approved For Release 2005/03/24 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000300010001-4._ TOP SECRET/CODEWORD Son Aen San e STARGATE Of the funds available to the Defense Intelligence Agency, Ike Committee directs tat $500,000 be applied to the STARGATE program and that the curren: 10 billets remain assigned to the program. The Commitee requests that funds be aneiiee roughly equaily lo foreign assessment, research and operational viewing. The Commitee is concemed that Congressional direction in the past regarding the solicitation of users across the NFIP and DoD and development of joint programs with the Russians and Chinese has only been sporadically pursued. The Committee remains perplexed 6 the obvious reluctance of 2 ip for this. SG1A It believes, for example, that liaison activities by program personnel and the personne of similar programs in other nations should be pursued and does ful accept the excuse that this somehow compronvises US intelligence activities. The Commities asa believes (hat the ume has come for a re-evaluation of the classification of the existence of this effort as well as the results that have been obtuinad over time. If the DIA has difficuhy (ling the billets that have been set aside for this activity by DIA personnel, consideration should be given 10 using them for Haison purposes with appropriate user organizations, Thus, the Committee wishes renewed effort on the par of DIA to pursue the following work sehecule in FY 95: @ «The DCI is requesied to. constrectsa. retrospective review and technical analysis of the data that-has been produced by the: program since:itsincepion. 20. years, aga, This includes an inventory and anaiysis of the files held in lhe CLA, while it administered the program as well as in DIA, The study shovie also address the compliance of the program with Congressional direction, =. : SG1I ¢ The DCI's declassisisation sommiliee. should. reniei’ the. bis.o grand nature ofthis, program, jo.deierminewhat. pars. of u.may. be declassined and-be. conseried into an. Qpenwionid activin, ( Direenom te DCT an ceclerg eee proud) 4 The. Director. of DLAJs.sequesied. to. Initiate. funher conucts. with-individuals invoived jn dhe. Russian. program.to.establisb.an open: world, declassified.activity of cooperation f- between the (wo.programsand.repont 10 the oversight Committees-byv February \, 1995 on-the-rasuiiswofhis-iniatives-in-ihis-regard. Prior to the letting of contracts with outside entides, the Commitee requests lo be noufied according to estadlished notification procecures. TOP SECRET/COOEWOROD Qing Craprarrnncl [jason @ Approved For Release 2005/03/24 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000300010001-4
y/re
Approved For Release 2005/03/24
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0003000100014
TOP SECRET/CODEWORD
^ ^
STARCATE
Of the funds as ailaMc
lo the Defense
Intelligence Agency,
the Committee directs that
S500.000 be applied
to the STARGATE program and
that the current
10 billets remain
assigned
to the program.
The Committee requests that funds be app.ied roughly equa;!y to
foreign assessment, research and operational viewing.
The Committee
is concerned
that
Congressional direction
in the past regarding the solicitation of users across the NTIP and
DoD and development of joint programs with
the Russians and Chinese has only been
sporadically pursued.
The Committee remains perplexed bj the obvious reluctance of
SGI A
<u-!sort on the run, of the DIA leadership
for
this progra
fit believes.
for example,
that liaison
activities by program personnel and
the personnel of similar
programs
in other rations should be pursued and does not accept the excuse
that
this
somehow compromises US intelligence activities.
The Committee itso believes
that ihc time
has come
for a re-evaluation of the classification of the existence of this effort as well as the
results
that have been obtained over time.
If the DIA has difficult)
It. ling the biilets
that
have been
set aside for this activity by DIA personnel, consideration should be given
to using
them
for liaison purposes
v. ith appropriate user organizations.
Tnus. the Committee wisr.es
renewed
effort on
the par. of DIA
to pursue
the following worV schedule
in FY 95:
$
•.The DCI
is reques;ed:to- construct,' a., retrospective review and
. technical analysis of the
data that -has .been .produced by ;the:prog ram, since: its.iinceptuon.^ywj'vaga
This
i ncludes an inventor.' and analysis of the
files held
in the CIA, while
it administered
the program
as well
as
in DIA.
The study should also address the compliance of the
program with Congressional direction.
. ,Thc PCI's, deciassifeation commiuee should, review, th^bjitp^and-.bAtwe .of-. this
„
rog^jo.di^raini-what pars.of iumay. be declassin ed and. be corwered
into an-
openworld-activiry.
^
p;rec.n<^
t*/ DC I
Tbe..DirectOi1 oX-DLA.is-J.C^Uesied.,to,,initiate. further, con tacts- w-ith-- individual r-iTn’Oived
.ifl, i-he. Ru s,subprogram., to. csubiishun, .open-^orld, decUssI fed-activity
1 of cooperation
- between the
; two-proeramfeand.iepon
to the oversight Commitices-by* February-
1. .
1 995
oa-the.-results..<ofvhi*4n uiatiy<u4n.- this-- regard
Prior to
the letting of contracts with outside
entities,
the Committee requests
to be
notified according to established notification procedures.
TOP SECRET/CODEWORD
Q
(,
t^r
tr
*~P
Approved For Release 2005/03/24
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300010001-4
r
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
UNCLASSIFIED
TECHNOLOGY SERIES
TYPEWRITER TARGET
a hmW< <**. a
uAsU, i«tu *v«t«
.
HU
J&fl WHO -
1113
"Hi J%yl4» mid UuitkCf
4 ^UW.
SUBJECT S3 RESPONSE
SUBJECT S4 RESPONSE
TA-760525-5
FIGURE
DRAWINGS OF A TYPEWRITER TARGET BY TWO SUBJECTS
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
SA-3 183-7
SUBJECT
<S4> DRAWING OF
DRILL PRESS SHOWING BELT DRIVE. STOOL AND
"VERTICAL GRAPH THAT GOES UP AND DOWN
FIGURE 9
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
belt drive for drill
PRESS (CAN BE SEEN ONLY
FROM ABOVE MACHINE)
TARGET: DRILL PRESS
(TECHNOLOGY SERIES)
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
UNCLASSIFIED
FIGURE
SUBJECT S4 RESPONSE TO BICYCLE SHED TARGET DESCRIBED AS AN OPEN
"BARN-LIKE BUILDING" WITH "SLATS ON THE SIDES" AND A "PITCHED
ROOF"
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
Approved For Release 2000/0863 EEG IRE f0722R000100120001-3 SUB-DATA FIELD STORAGE PORTION OF DATA TREE EXAMPLE CENTER LANE INFORMATION EXAMPLE STATEMENT: "I see a fresh water lake adjacent to the target" Such a statement would be attributed in actual file to a specific collector and project number, along with an accurate or non-accurate notation. This may be recalled in the following format: "HU001-84-3, Robert Brown, Sub-file=Under Area, WATER=Accurate, FRESH=Inaccurate, LAKE=Accurate." "Estimated Accuracy under Sub-fileé AREA is 66%, WATER=1003%, FRESH=00%, LAKE=100%." AREA WATER LAND FRESH OCEAN MOUNTAIN DESERT i T OT a | LAKE POND COLD WARM HIGH LOW SCRUB SAND PORTION OF DATA TREE EXAMPLE SRI-I INFORMATION The same statement in the SRI-I file would not be attributable to any specific project number but through use of a code number reflect the accuracy of a specific collector. Such as: "Collector=#009, Sub-file=Area, A/Sub-file l=Accurate, B/Sub-file 1=Not Accurate, C/Sub-file l=Accurate." "Estimated Accuracy; Sub-file AREA is 66%, A/Sub-file=1003%, B/Sub-file=00%, C/Sub-file=1003." AREA 1 . 2 >———-- —T —_—-—_______—__, 1 2 3 4 pT —y oo a ; _t 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Approved For Release 2000/ 15 0) 4 el eaeeneaianannaaan
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 001 20009-5
Table 5
SUMMARY OF RV DATA FOR VIEWER
688
\
S’/loJ s-t
\3S~C>
?//*/?< I
\H2S
j
IH 2 S
J
s/s'/s* f 1
10^5 J
=?/z V?l>
1-430
j
1 °/4/S> I 4
l-4?o
J-
14'S" J
H?o
J
142 s /
9/n/iPI
'S'
J
10/z/flV
/4 ?o
>
lo/i/ *
/
IJ?0 r.
Trial
Number
FZ
“
'
- 7
^12
z
. 4
Target Site
Church on Hill
Locomotive Playground
Ely Chevrolet
Mills Florist
Salt
Pile
SRI Bike Shed
Stanford Shopping Center
Boy Scout Fire Circle
Palo Alto City Hall
Underground Garage
Methodist Church
Art Museum
Targeting
Technique
A
A
A
B
B
B
C
C
C
C'
C'
C'
Accuracy Rating
3.5
\
X
4 * 5
|
2-J*
2.5
)
Abstract
Beacon
Coordinates
Coordinates with
Mid—Session Feedback*
Mean
Rating/
Mode
5.2
3.8
2.7
4.2;
3.5
First set of evaluations are made on the basis
of
second set, on the basis
of the entire transcript
material generated before feedback;
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 001 20009-5
does replication set A. Replication set C shows two studies differing markedly in Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100130006-7 both level of significance and magnitude (and direction) of effect size. Replication set C, then, is a not very subtle example of a clear failure to replicate. It should be noted that the values of Table 5 were chosen so that the combined probability of the two studies of sets A, B, and C would all be identical to one another; (Z,+Z,)/ V2 = Zof 2.77, p=.0028, one-tailed. Some Metrics of the Success of Replication Once we adopt a view of the success of replication as a function of similarity of effect sizes obtained, we can become more precise in our assessments of the success of replication. Insert Figure 1 about here The replication diagonal. Figure 1 shows the “replication plane” generated by crossing the results of the first study conducted (expressed in units of the effect size r) by the results of the second study conducted. All perfect replications, those in which the effect sizes are identical in the two studies, fall on a diagonal rising from the lower left corner (-1.00, -1.00) to the upper right corner (+1.00, +1.00). The results of replication set B from Table 5 are shown to fall exactly on the diagonal of perfect Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100130006-7
Indeed, it need not be the mean at all but any measure of location or central Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100130006-7 tendency (e.g., the median). Insert Tables 6 & 7 about here Table 6 has been prepared to give some feel for the practical meaning of several degrees of variability (S) for seven sets of five replicates each, assuming a mean effect size of zero. For our effect size indicator we have employed the Fisher Z trans- formation of the correlation coefficient r. When the range of the five Zr’s is only from ~.02 to +.02, S=.016; when the range is from -1.00 to +1.00, S=.791. Table 7 shows the replication robustness coefficients for each of the seven degrees of variability (S) for each of four levels of mean effect size (Zr): .10, .30, .50, and .70. There are no intrinsic meanings to any particular robustness coefficients. Instead, they are intended to be used to compare different research domains for their replicational robustness in a merely heuristic way. What Should Be Reported? If we are to take seriously our newer view of the meaning of the success of replications, what should be reported by authors of papers seen to be replications of earlier studies? Clearly, reporting the results of tests of significance will not be Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100130006-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/^0
792R0001 001 20001 -3
TRIAD DATA BASE GRAPH
DATA BASE
DATA BASE
DATA BASE
ONE
TWO
THREE
TRAINING
OPERATIONAL
OPERATIONAL
PREDETERMINE FIELDS
STORE
INITIAL OPERATIONAL
STORE CURRENT
INFORMATION
STATISTICAL ACCURACIES
DEVELOP NEW FIELDS
STORE ACCURACY FEEDBACK
MODIFY STATISTICAL
DETERMINE
STRENGTHS
ACCURACIES
PASS UPDATED ACCURACY
DETERMINE WEAKNESSES
EVALUATIONS
INSERT NEW ORIGINAL
COLLECTOR ACCURACIES
PROVIDE
INITIAL
PREDICT ACCURACY ON
STATISTICAL ACCURACY
UNEVALUATED FIELDS
Approved For Release 2oo$rajn (C/R-lroiEe 00792R0001 001 20001 -3
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
UNCLASSIFIED
TABLE C-l
(Continued)
07 42
10 98
28 07
29 90
40 77
16 76 43
70 97
56 26 93
10 06 24
53 40
40 35
38 ; 48
89 90 96
15 08 95
96 46
10 06 04
66 95
34 47
68 75 66
75 02
55 20
'
87 86
68 42
59 63
17 69
68 63
52 99 24 66 50
89 39
18 47
87 46 26
88 69 25
20 09 44
60 93
96 02
38 89 36
28 90
24 46
06 87
45 46
78 46
10 89 36 43
63 64
92 95 00
90 43
68 90
45 97
70 94
12 02
54 98
19 98
79 22
98 60
26 98 92 66
59 46
70 45
96 69
''02
24 73
13 40
29 36
47 86 77
90 67
16 30
52 08
97 92
12 20
40 56
93 04 06 64
76 86
93 00
02 98
65 00
03 68
36 00
58 93
35 65 27
12 48
79 90
85 49
26 90 78
68 05 26 54
19 41 08
66 87
27 93 67 80
99 46 90 72
02 98
53 03
89 96
20 96 85
98 26 84
19 77
95 46
54 96
26 76
79 88
16 00
66 62 90 55
29 80 56 49 94
13 93 44
86 43
19 44
40 48 69
17 06
24 99 04
10 99
84 97 80
75 04
00 66 29
95 96 69 09 47
76 56
74 65
07 63
54 83 40
36 30
17 08
18 92
88 46 00 63
26 49 47 08
19 66
54 36 32
66 46 07
70 44 08
35 49 30
18 25
83 09 54 06
57 94
57 75 09
14 29
86 49 76
87 09
28 96 88
19 36
34 98 99
88 47
- 26 22
59 97
58 83 66
C-3
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
UNCLASSIFIED
TABLE C-l
(Continued)
39 28
59 36
89 27
02 33
07 47
18 86
27 63
06 33 56
14 28
76 76
28 43
54 68
15 68
35 99
78 45
35 48 44
86 06
68 44
35 48 85
59 55
99 09
90 66 03
50 50 20 08
35 00
33 00 69 26 90
66 38
55 49 23
30 00 97 04
54 35
36 89
70 44
08 39
70 43
16 66
72 06
88 09 52
66 66
38 62 96 56
87 38
43 89 85 05 96
79 52
64 62
16 09 02 62
12 99
29 08
27 45 64 26
45 25
75 23 57
57 38
08 90
12 45
34 49
30 08
64 04 99 43
10 47 42
47 45
90 65
36 09 96
56 90 38
42 04 40 86 49
19 28 08
88 03
64 44 65
89 45 92
30 47
42 59 64
90 60
54 99 83
40 87
18 03
70 43
96 98
78 39
26 46 05 05
76 42
76 25 48 06
73 63
16 95
07 06
59 47
26 62
69 09
27 40 95
96 32
19 50
40 89 49
89 62
35 08
49 43
82 07
03 46
09 43
95 55
34 56
76 05
58 43
30 40 73
20 49 44
94 40
65 98 96 28 43
06 64 49 47
29 54
10 39
98 44
15 29
99 94
76 75
09 30 42
60 92
89 38
69 29 38 98 75
02 65
15 29
52 36 42
70 40 24
90 30
36 92
16 69 67 48
78 48
19 33
26 63
19 09 55
80 35
75 69 29
87 90
66 97
00 48
80 47
16 63
56 94 42
78 46 88 23*80
08 00 22
70 04 20 93
73 44
66 99
00 23
02 00 66 99
59 60
52 25
St!**
C-4
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2006/11/29
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000300030004-9
. ‘ Approved For Release —S-oREr ee MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 21 Jun 84 SUBJECT: Security Hazard (U) 1.(U) On 15 June 1984, at 1330 this office received a telephone call from The Special Operations Detachment (SOD), INSCOM that SOD had received a document which should have gone to our office. The undersigned immediately went to SOD and secured the document. 2, (8S) The document was classified SECRET/CENTER LANE 4/NO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION. and had been sent to this office from the office of the SGFOIASS INSCOM. The envelope containing the document was addressed simply OL Buzby. The only two people who had seen the document were the SOD courier, who had transported the document from Arlington Hall to SOD, and the SOD Secretary, Rn, wh] had opened the envelope and got the phone number of this office off the blame line O SGROIAS SGFOIA3 SGFOIA3 3 iii was interviewed on 18 June and PY was interviewed on 19 June 1984 concerning the incident. Both denied reading the document other than to obtain the telephone number of our office. Neither could recall any information contained in the document. Both individuals were informed of the sensitivity of the program and as a precaution they both executed a briefing and a debriefing statement. Both individuals are cleared for TOP SECRET and because of the nature of their duties they are used to working with highly sensitive information. Because of the above it is highly unlikely that a compromise took place. 4, (S) The reason for the security hazard was the failure to follow the provisions of AR 380-5 concerning the addressing of classified material for transmission. SG1I Approved For Release scoot : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100050001 -1
Approved For Release 200
-00792R0001 00050001-1
MEMORANDUM
FOR
RECORD
SUBJECT:
Security
Hazard
(U)
Jun
l.(U)
On
June
1984,
at
1330
this
office
received
a
telephone
call
from
The
Special
Operations
Detachment
(SOD),
INSC0M
that
SOD
had
received
a
document
which
should
have
gone
to
our
office.
The
undersigned
immediately went
to
SOD
and
secured
the
document.
SGFOIA^
2.
(S)
The
document
was
classified
SECRET /CENTER
LANE
4/N0
FOREIGN
DISSEMINATION,
and
had
been
sent
to
this
office
from
the
office
of
the
G
INSC0M.
The
envelope
containing
the
document
was
addressed
simply
0L
Buzby.
The
only
two
people
who
had
seen
the
document
were
the
SOD
courier
,
who
Arlington
Hall
to
SOD,
and
the
SOD
Secretary,
had
opened
the
envelope
and
got
the
phone
number
of
this
office
off
the
blame
line
of
the
document.
SGFOIA3
SGFOIA3
SGFOIA3
who
had
transported
the
document
from
(U)
W-M W 1/ IV
,
was
interviewed
on
June
and
intervTewe^r^9
June
1984
concerning
the
incident.
Both
denied
reading
the
document
other
than
to
obtain
the
telephone
number
of
our
office.
Neither
could
recall
any
information
contained
in
the
document.
Both
individuals
were
informed
of
the
sensitivity
of
the
program
and
as
a
precaution
they
both
executed
a
briefing
and
a
debriefing
statement.
Both
individuals
are
cleared
for
TOP
SECRET
and
because
of
the
nature
of
their
duties
they
are
used
to
working
with
highly
sensitive
information.
Because
of
the
above
it
is
highly
unlikely
that
a
compromise
took
place.
4.
(S)
The
reason
for
the
security
hazard
was
the
failure
to
follow
the
provisions
of
AR
380-5
concerning
the
addressing
of
classified
material
for
transmission.
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2000/06E8REF
r08/10
: CIA-RDP96-
CIA-RDP96-00792R0001 00050001 -1
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100120009-5 nn ent es —— Table 5 SUMMARY OF RV DATA FOR VIEWER 688 Targeting Target Site Technique Accuracy Rating S/o] FI witie Church on Hill 25 f . Locomotive Playground Abstract Haslert Ely Chevrolet 42s als/@ Mills Florist ee ety Salt Pile Beacon IG so : cyorel SRI Bike Shed 3 1430 eae Stanford Shopping Center 3 4S Boy Scout Fire Circle <p Coordinates melery Palo Alto City Hall 2 1430 =. 9/29/81 es Underground Garage C d t h IAAP Methodist Church Cordinates wit * 14 Mid~-Session Feedback 0/2 / BN . Art Museum {430 vole/# It [330 * First set of evaluations are made on the basis of second set, on the basis of the entire transcript. material generated before feedback; eee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000100120009-5
* Npptoved'Fot Reldas® 2006/08/10 : CIA-RDP96*00792RG002063 0005-7 * * * * * * * UNCLASSIFIED kok ke kK Rk kK kK kK KR Kk kK RK K KK Rw KR KR KR RK KR KR RK KR RK RK RK kK RK KK SEQUENCE NR: RELATES: PERSON: PROTITLE: PERS CTY: FACILITY: SUPERTOR: FACL CTY: FSUBORD: FACILITY: SUBORD: FACL CTY: FACL LOC: FSUBORD: RELATES: FACILITY: FACL CTY: FACL LOC: FACILITY: FACL CTY: FACL LOC; FACILITY: FACL CTY: FACL LOC: NOMN: NOMN CTY: SGi1J CIF90005966  USER-(MM) ID: 43070-92APR28/10.52.06/A01 PFN INFORMATION: PART 026 YI ZENG IS A MEMBER OF AIDS RESEARCH AND TESTING CENTER (CHINESE ACAD OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE). ZENG, YI VIROLOGIST, PROFESSOR, DIRECTOR PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) AIDS RESEARCH AND TESTING CENTER CHINESE ACAD OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) FACILITY SUBORDINATION DATA PFN INFORMATION: PART 027 CHINA MEDICAL SCIENCE UNIV MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) SHENYANG FACILITY SUBORDINATION DATA PFN INFORMATION: PART 028 JILIN ANTICANCER ASSOCIATION CHANGBAISHAN PHARMACEUTICAL INST, TIANJIN INST OF MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND CHINA INST OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINES BEIJING GUANGANMEN HOSPITAL ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TIANXIAN ANTICANCER DRUG. JILIN ANTICANCER ASSOCIATION CHANGBAISHAN PHARMACEUTICAL INST PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) CHANGBAISHAN TIANJIN INST OF MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) TIANJIN CHINA INST OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINES BEIJING GUANGANMEN HOSPITAL PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) BEIJING TIANXIAN ANTICANCER DRUG PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CH) kk Rk RK RK RK RK KR Rk Rk Rk KR Kk OR Kk KR Rk kK KR RK RK RK KR KR KR kK K RK RK KK UNCLASSIFIED PAGE 65 kok RK kK Rk kk Kk Kk Kk Rk ok kK KR Kk RK KR RK RK Rk KR RK kK KK RK KR kK RK kK kK KK Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200310005-7
Approved For Release 2000/080 |j£0ljj^|E^O792ROOO1 001 20001 -3
SUB-DATA FIELD STORAGE
PORTION OF
DATA TREE
EXAMPLE
CENTER LANE
INFORMATION
EXAMPLE
STATEMENT:
"I
see
a
fresh water
lake adjacent
to
the
target"
Such
a
statement would be attributed
in actual
file
to
a specific
collector
and project
number,
along with
an accurate
or non-accurate
notation.
This may be recalled
in
the following format:
"HU001-84-3,
Robert
Brown,
Sub-f ile=Under
Area,
WATER=Accurate,
FRESH=Inaccurate,
LAKE=Accurate
.
"Estimated Accuracy under
Sub-file AREA
is
66%,
WATER=100%,
FRESH = 0 0 %
,
LAKE = 10 0 %
.
LAKE~
FRESH
i
I
WATER
AREA
OCEAN
LAND
I
POND
COLD
,
HIGH
r
MOUNTAIN
I
DESERT
I
"sand
WARM
LOW
SCRUB
PORTION
OF
DATA TREE EXAMPLE
SRI -I
INFORMATION
The
same statement
in
the
SRI-I
file would
not
be attributable
to
any
specific project number
but
through
use
of
a
code number
reflect
the
accuracy
of
a specific
collector.
Such
as:
"Collector =#009
,
Sub-f ile=Area ,
A/Sub-file l=Accurate,
B/Sub-file
l=Not Accurate,
C/Sub-file
l=Accurate."
"Estimated Accuracy;
Sub-file AREA
is
66%,
A/Sub-f ile=100%
,
B/Sub-f ile=00%,
C/Sub-f ile=100%
.
r
AREA
J
T
T
- T
_L
J?
Approved For Release 2000/^1C13ET
00792R0001 001 20001 "3