eee TN Oe aT AN TTT Ce Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 CONTENTS IT OBJECTIVE, 2. 6 6 6 6 8 we ee ee et ee ew tt ee L II PROGRESS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD ........6ee 2 A. Applied Research. . . . 1. 6 1 1 1 oe © we ew ew ew 2 1, Remote Viewing . . 1. 2. 6 2 eee we we ew es 2 (a) Project Atlas Remote Viewing. ...... 2 (b) Costa Rica Remote Viewing Experiment. .. 6 (c) Local Targets with Mid-Test Feedback. . , 7 (d) Local Targets with Azimuth Bearing. ... 11 B. Basic Research, . . 1. 4 6 6 ww ew eee te we he 11 1, Criteria for the Determination of Gifted Individuals, . . 1. 1. 1 6 6 ew ew ew ew ew we eh 12 (a) Remote Viewing of Natural Targets .... 16 (ob) Line Drawings . . 1... ee ee ew th we 17 (c) Four-State Electronic Random Stimulus Generator . . 2. 2. 6 6 es © we eh we ew ew eh 18 2. Identification of Measurable Characteristics Possessed by Gifted Subjects (20%) ...... 22 (a) Medical Evaluation, . . 1. 1 2 ee ew 22 (b) Psychological Evaluation, ....4.+ee-5 24 (c) Neuropsychological Evaluation ...... 41 3. Identification of Neurophysiological Correlates Which Relate to Paranormal Activities (20%) . . . 0. 2. 4 1 6 ee we wh we 41 (a) Bilateral EEG Measurements~-Remote Strobe Experiment. . 2. 6. 6 ©» «© © © © © © © @ we 42 (bo) Physiological Correlates of Remote Viewing . 2. 1 5» 6 «© © © © eo we we wes 43 4, Identification of the Nature of Paranormal Phenomena and Energy (10%) . . 1. 6 2 © ew we 44 (a) Universal Randomization Protocol, .... 46 (b) Experiments with Develco Superconducting Differential Magnetometer (Gradiometer) . 50 di Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
eee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 (c) Experiments with Laser-Monitored Torsion Pendulum. . . . « » «+ «© «© # «© w© « 55 (d) Experiments with Geiger Counter ..... 59 5. Basic Research Summary . . . 5 6 1 6 « © ww 60 Appendix 1--RANDOMNESS TESTS OF FOUR-STATE ELECTRONIC RANDOM STIMULUS GENERATOR, «2. 6 6 «© 6 5 © «© © © © wo 61 Appendix 2--PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE USE OF THE FOUR-STATE ELECTRONIC RANDOM STIMULUS GENERATOR . 66 Appendix 3--SAMPLE OF RAW DATA--MEDICAL EVALUATION OF SUBJECT 1... 1. 2 6 © 6 © © © oo eo ow ew ew 80 Appendix 4--PRELIMINARY NOTES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING. ... 103 iii Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
ee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 I OBJECTIVE The purpose of the program is to determine the characteristics of those perceptual modalities through which individuals obtain information about their environment, wherein such information is not presented to any known sense, The program is divided into two categories of investigation of approximately equal effort, applied research and basic research. The purpose of the applied research effort is to explore experimentally the potential for applications of perceptual abilities of interest, with special attention given to accuracy and reliability. The purpose of the basic research effort is to identify the characteristics of individuals possessing such abilities, and to identify neurophysiological correlates and basic mechanisms involved in such functioning. Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
(ene AIA AAI CEE TT Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 II PROGRESS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD A. Applied Research 1. Remote Viewing (a) Project Atlas Remote Viewing A remote-viewing experiment has been carried out on a client-designated target of interest, a European R&D test facility. The experiment, carried out in three phases, had as its goal the determina- tion of the utility of remote-viewing under operational conditions. In Phase I, map coordinates were furnished to the experi- menters, the only additional information provided being the designation of the target as an R&D test facility. The experimenters then carried out a remote viewing experiment with Subject 1" on a double-blind basis, The results of the experiment were turned over to client representatives for data evaluation, Figure 1 shows the level of detail for a sample early effort at building layout, and Figure 2 shows the subject's first effort at drawing a gantry crane he observed, both results being obtained on a double-blind basis before exposure to client-held information. An artist's conception of the site as known to the client (but not to contract per- sonnel) prior to the experiment is shown in Figure 3. * Numerical designations for subjects are discussed in Section B, Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Eee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 W nw Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 DAY FIGURE 1 SUBJECT EFFORT AT BUILDING LAYOUT
Tee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 SA-3183-11 ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF TARGET SITE (ATLAS EXPERIMENT) FIGURE 3 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 Were the results not promising, the experiment would have stopped at this point, The results were judged to be of sufficiently good quality, however, that Phase II was entered in which the subject was made witting by client representatives, A second round of experimentation ensued with participation of client representatives, The Phase II effort was focussed on the generation of physical data which could be client-verified, providing a calibration in the process. The end of Phase II gradually evolved into the first part of Phase III, the generation of unverifiable data not available to the client, but of interest nonetheless, Evaluation of the data by the client is under way. (b) Costa Rica Remote Viewing Experiment Subjects 1 and 4 participated in a long-distance experiment involving a Central American target series, In this experiment, one of the experimenters (Dr. Puthoff) spent a week traveling through Costa Rica on a combination business/pleasure trip. That is all that was known to the subjects about the traveler's itinerary. The experiment called for Dr. Puthoff to keep a detailed record of his location and activities, including photographs, each day at 1330 PDT, Six daily responses were obtained from Subject 1, five from Subject 4. The results were of high quality and are presently being evaluated in detail, containing as they did a large amount of material. Samples of that data are as follows, Of the five daily responses obtained from Subject 4, two were in good agreement, two had elements in common but were not clear correspondences, and one was clearly a miss, In the first of the two reasonably good matches, Dr. Puthoff was driving in rugged terrain at the base of a volcano and the subject's response was "large bare table 6 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Re Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 mountain, jungle below, dark cool moist atmosphere, a reasonable corre- spondence both with regard to topography and ambience. In the second match the subject submitted that all she got was a "picture of Dr. Puthoff sitting in a beach chair by a pool," which was entirely correct. The transcript data will be examined further to determine fine structure, resolution, etc. (c) Local Targets with Mid-Test Feedback In this series of experiments, designed to give immediate data to experimenters, a subject is asked to take part in a remote viewing experiment under the following conditions. The subject and two experimenters (one of whom was R.T.) are in a first floor laboratory in Building 30 at SRI. A second experi- menter (H.P.) leaves the area and proceeds to a remote location of his choosing. None of the experimenters with the subject knew of the remote target location, H.P, and R.T. are in two-way yadio communication via walkie-talkie (a) to provide the experimenter at the target location real- time data and (b) to give the subject immediate feedback after he has made his assessment of the target. By this means the subject has.an opportunity to learn to separate real from imagined images. This is not considered to be a demonstration-of-ability test, but rather a training step on a gradient scale of ability. In many of these experiments we monitor physiological correlates as discussed in Section B.3 (b). (Nine of these experiments have been completed to date, seven with the measurements of physiological correlates.) The following is a sample of an experiment with Subject 4. In this experiment we monitored physiological correlates of the remote viewing activity. Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 “SA-3183-12 ZIGZAG WATERWAY FIGURE 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 R.T.: WATER, WE CAN'T TELL. IT'S SHINY AND THERE'S VERY LITTLE VEGETATION==NO VEGETATION AROUND,... S-4; Mostly concrete. . , R.T.: IT'S MOSTLY CONCRETE... S-4; He's standing on conerete.... R.T.: YOU'RE STANDING ON CONCRETE, OVER, f.P,: IT CERTAINLY IS TRUE THAT THTS IS SHINY AND IN MY NEAR VICINITY IT IS BARREN AND CONCRETE OR CONCRETE-COLORED EARTH. SHE SAID THAT IT LOOKED LIKE STEEL OR WATER. CAN SHE MAKE THE DIFFERENTIA- TION BETWEEN THE TWO? R.T.: He wants to know whether it looks more like steel or water, 8-4: It seems to have movement~-that's why I would deduce that it's water. R.T.: What if you try to look at the whole thing, S-4; I'm trying to get an eagle's eye view, That's a waterworks, R.T.: Why does it look like a waterworks? In what way? 8-4: There seems to be a man=made layout of channels and connections to conduct it. R.T.: 8-4 SEES MOVEMENT IN THE ZIGZAG THING, .SO SHE THINKS THAT IT'S WATER, AND A KIND OF LAYOUT OF CHANNELS AS THOUGH IT WAS A MAN-= MADE WATERWORKS WITH WATER RUNNING IN ZIGZAG CHANNELS. OVER, H.P.: THAT IS PRECISELY CORRECT. IT IS A ZIGZAG MAN-MADE CHANNEL WITH CONCRETE SIDES. OVER. S-4; I can't believe it. The above is an excerpt from an early experiment, and is typical, rather a sample of exceptionally good quality, That experiment continued with four more site descriptions, three of which were of equal quality. 10 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 One experiment of this nature has been carried out with Subject 1, one with Subject 2, two with Subject 3, and five with Subject 4, A number of descriptions were essentially free of error and with no feedback other than verification following the remote viewer's description. A complete analysis is to be carried out on these trans- cripts following more experimentation. To date it appears that the viewing is weak in the following areas: (a) perspective and dimension are often distorted (an 8-foot tower is taken to be 50 feet tall, a 20- foot separation between buildings may appear to be 100 feet, etc.), and (b) written material generally cannot be read, (d) Local Targets with Azimuth Bearing =e ee moe pearing In two remote viewing experiments, the second of which was clearly correct from a descriptive standpoint, an effort was made to de~ termine whether in driving the subject around the area it would be possible to determine the location of the target team by triangulation with a bearing compass, The triangulation lines were essentially uncorrelated with each other and with the target location, and therefore provided a null result, B. Basic Research In addition to the testing of individuals under conditions which yield data indicating the feasibility of the application of paranormal abilities to operational needs, 50 percent of the effort is devoted to: (1) Identification of measurable characteristics possessed by gifted individuals (20%). (2) Identification of neurophysiological correlates which relate to paranormal activities (20%). (3) Identification of the nature of paranormal phenomena and energy (10%). il Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 To meet these objectives four specific requirements must be fulfilled during the course of experimentation: (1) establish and apply criteria to differentiate between those for whom paranormal ability is considered to be functional and those for whom it is not; (2) obtain sufficient medical and psychological data to establish baseline profiles against which (a) one individual may be compared with another, and (b) an in- dividual may be compared to himself at different times to determine whether paranormal functioning occurs in an altered neurophysiological state; (3) specific validation experiments must be conducted with suffi- cient control to ensure that all conventional communication paths are blocked, with outcomes sufficiently unambiguous to determine whether paranormal functioning occurred; (4) obtain neurophysiological data during experimentation to determine those correlates, if any, which relate to paranormal activity. In the following paragraphs, each of these items is considered in turn and the progress to date reported, The milestone chart for the basic research program is shown in Table 1, The work is progressing in accor~ dance with the schedule prepared for this program, and the remaining time and funds are sufficient to meet all program objectives, 1, Criteria for the Determination of Gifted Individuals One of the key issues in the program is the establishment of criteria capable of differentiating individuals who are apparently gifted in paranormal functioning from those who are not. Three experimental paradigms were chosen to act as screening tests on the basis that these tests had been useful for such purposes prior to this program (in the sense that certain apparently gifted in- dividuals did exceedingly well on at least one of the tests, whereas the results of unselected volunteers did not differ significantly from chance 12 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 juodoi TeuTy ezederd °6 Eeeenenneeen sTopow TPOFJetoayy Aepysuos pue eIep SIPTEII0D °B ih Z nen ; MO PFAIBIUT Sitscene yadap-uy Buzpntouy ‘Buzase; TeoTsoToyossd *L a Sitbeneeeee Zutjsez TeoFZoToyoAsdomneN *9 a Saibeeueee SuT4s93 Tepoeds SuppnTouT ‘3uTIse} TeOTPeW *S ; ‘ ‘ laqyawoT peas) PAR -AG-HH paATOAUT sazT3zsus Jo aunqeu Surmia33P oO} YOM °Y a uofyequeutasdxs Tewrouesed zayno (q | | . sjuoupzedxs O70 Teuzouered (# 4 - . wopTyequowpaodxe Tewzouvaed ZUp,ANpP saqeTI7109 TeopZoTopssydoanan aansvoy “€ aa i aay a: quetto Aq sqoefqns jo Buziseq “s*T'v's *Z 13 *pas3nqop Suyssado0ad A ; xoyndwod yyFA qeT TvoFsoTo skydoanau dn Jog ‘T ere eee ner panne ne omaummnnianemnemmneal ee oer J pon en enmmmnannenenmmenmnnaatant CT] ZU, Tr} OT] G| B} 2] 94 S 7) € @,T Il - WiInawlos NyWDOUd SHLNOW T STdvai Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 aj cl adinlol st vi fryer] wi vini a
re a Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791 R000100430001-0 expectation). The tests are (a) remote viewing of natural targets, (b) reproduction of simple line drawings hidden from the subject but . viewed by an experimenter, and (c) determination of the state of a four- state electronic random stimulus generator. The first test constitutes a so-called “free-response’ paradigm in which the subject originates freely about contents of his awareness; furthermore, the channel in general may involve both direct perception of the remote site and perception of the mental contents of an observer at the site. The second test is more constrained than the first in that the target information is more analytical or abstract, being associated with a graphical representation of an item of interest rather than the item itself, The third test is the most constrained in that the target ig blind to all participants in the experiment and the subject's choice is precisely constrained, The details of these tests are given below, For the purpose of screening, the criteria as to what constitutes a paranormal result was chosen arbitrarily, viz: For the purpose of screening a result is to be considered paranormal if the a priori probability for the occurrence of the result by chance, under the null hypothesis, is -6 p< 10 . Although the above requirement is exceedingly strict by usual psycho- physiological standards, it is chosen here (a) because the controversial nature of the subject requires strict handling, and (b) in our work and elsewhere, a bimodal distribution has been observed empirically in which a subset of individuals participating in paranormal research produce re- -6 sults at a level of statistical significance p = 10 in comparison with 14 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 the bulk of individuals who cluster about the mean as expected. There- fore, we base our criteria on an observable natural division into clearly functional and nonfunctional categories. Six subjects have been chosen for the study to date, subjects 1, 2, and 3 considered gifted, subjects 4, 5, and 6 acting as learners * or controls, Subject 1 qualifies as a gifted subject on the basis of remote viewing; subject 2 qualifies as gifted on the basis of the random generator test; subject 3 is tentatively classed as gifted in remote viewing, al- though not yet completing the screening series, based on client evaluation of highly successful remote-viewing experiments carried out for the client in the previous program, and also on the basis of meeting the p< 10- criterion in experimentation at another laboratory. Subject 5 (learner/control), a male, age 54, is paired with gifted subject 1, a male, age 55. Learner/control subject 6, a female, age 34, is by age, background, and temperament paired with gifted subject 2, a male, age 31. Learner subject 4 (female, age 53) and gifted subject 3 (male, age 41) are paired on the basis of artistic occupations (pro- fessional photographer and painter, respectively) and similar emotional and psychological makeup. in *narlier in the program nine subjects were to be placed in three cate- gories, three subjects each: gifted subjects, learners, and controls. However experience in the early part of the program indicated that (a) a best effort would require spending more time with fewer people, and (b) the distinction between learners and controls was arbitrary in comparison with the distinction between these categories and that of gifted subjects as defined above. 15 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 (a) Remote Viewing of Natural Targets The first screening test is based on previous SRI research results which indicate that it is possible for a:subject to describe ran- domly chosen geographical sites located several miles from the subject's position and demarcated by some appropriate means, This experiment consists of a series of double-blind tests involving local targets in the San Francisco Bay area which can be docu- mented by independent judging. Target locations within 30 minutes driving time from SRI are randomly chosen from a list of targets kept blind to subject and experimenters and used without replacement. To begin an experiment, an experimenter is closeted with a subject at SRI to wait 30 minutes to begin a narrative description of the remote location. A second experimenter obtains a target location from the target pool and proceeds directly to the target without communicating with the subject or experimenter remaining behind. The second experi- menter remains at the target site for an agreed-upon 30-minute period following the 30 minutes allotted for travel. During the observation period, the remote viewing subject is asked to describe his impressions of the target site into a tape recorder, A comparison is made when the experimenter returns, Following a series of nine experiments, the results are subjected to independent judging on a blind basis by five SRI scientists not otherwise associated with the research. The judges are asked to blind match locations, independently visited, against typed manuscripts of tape~recorded narratives of the remote viewer, A given narrative can be assigned to more than one target location. A correct match requires that a transcript of a given date be associated with the target of that date, Probability calculations are on the basis of the a priori 16 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
ee Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 probability of the obtained series of matches by chance, conservatively assuming assignment without replacement on the part of the judges. - As indicated in Report No. 1, Subject 1 has completed this -10 series, obtaining a result significant at the p = 8 % 10 level. Ex- perimentation is in progress with Subjects 2 and 4, two transcripts having been obtained from each to date. (b) Line Drawings A pool of 50 simple line drawings of everyday objects has been drawn, randomized, and placed in a secure location. During experimentation, experimenters and subject are separated by either an experimenter or subject entering a shielded room 'so that from that time forward the subject is at all times visually, acoustically, and electrically shielded from personnel and material at the target location, Following isolation a target is chosen by means of the universal randomization protocol technique described in Section 4 (a), used in this case to generate a two-digit number modulo 50. The subject's task is then to reproduce with pen on paper the line drawing now displayed at the target location. Following a period of effort not to exceed half an hour, the subject may either pass (when he docs not feel confident) or indicate he is ready to submit a drawing to the experimenters, in which case the drawing is collected by an experimenter before the subject is permitted to see the target. The experiment is then repeated with replacement until ten drawings have been obtained from the subject. To obtain an independent evaluation of the correlation between target and response data, the experimenters submit the data for 17 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 judging on a blind basis by two SRI scientists not otherwise associated with the research. The judges are asked to match the response data with the corresponding target data (without replacement). Such experimentation is presently in progress, a number of drawings having been obtained from several of the subjects but have not yet been submitted for judging. (c) Four-State Electronic Random Stimulus Generator The determination of the state of a four-state electronic random stimulus generator comprises the third screening test. The target is in the form of one of four art slides chosen randomly (p = 1/4) by an electronic random generator. The generator does not indicate its choice until the subject indicates his choice to the machine by pressing a button (see Figure 5). As soon as the subject indicates his choice, the target slide is illuminated to provide visual and auditory (bell if correct) feedback as to the correctness or incorrectness of his choice. Until that time both subject and experimenter remain ignorant of the machine's choice, so the experiment is of the double-blind type. Five legends at the top of the machine face are illuminated one at a time with increasing correct choices (6, 8, 10, ...) to provide additional reinforcement. The machine choice, subject choice, cumulative trial number, and cumulative hit number are recorded automatically on a printer. Following trial number 25, the machine must be reset manually by depressing a RESET button, A methodological feature of the machine is that the choice of a target is not forced. That is, a subject may press a PASS button when he wishes not to guess, in which case the machine indicates what its choice was, and neither a hit nor a trial is scored by the machine, which then goes on to make its next selection. Thus, the subject does not have 18 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 Figure 5, ESP Teaching Machine used in this experiment. An incorrect choice of target is indicated. Two of the five "encouragement lights" at the top of the machine are illuminated. The printer to the right of the machine records data on fan-fold paper tape. 19 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
a a a ee ca Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791 R000100430001-0 . ' to guess at targets when he does not feel that he has an idea as to which to choose, Under the null hypothesis of random binomial choices with probability 1/4 and no learning, the probability of observing 2k successes in n trials is approximated by the probability of a normal distribution value For the purpose of sereening, each subject is required to complete 100 25-trial runs (i.e., a total of 2,500 trials). To date Subjects 1, 2, and 6 have completed this phase of the screening program, and their results are tabulated in Table 2. Subject 4 has completed 2,100 trials with mean scores of 25.71 (p = 0.20). Table 2 SCREENING DATA: FOUR-STATE ELECTRONIC RANDOM STIMULUS GENERATOR Mean Score/100 Trials Over 2,500 Trials Binomial Probability 25.76 0,22 On the basis of this test Subject 2, whose scores are plotted in Figure 6, qualifies as a gifted individual, having satisfied the criterion of producing a result whose a priori probability under the null hypothesis is p< 10°, of further interest are this subject's personal observations of subjective experiences during the screening test, presented in Appendix 2. 20 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 50 40 30 - Out of 100 trials/run. 20 HITS/RUN 10 0 10 20 30 RUN NUMBER - 100 Trials/Run p = i per trial FIGURE 6 DATA SUMMARY FOR SUBJECT 2 al Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0 2. Identification of Measurable Characteristics Possessed by Gifted Subjects (20%) (a) Medical Evaluation The medical evaluation of program participants has been assigned to the Palo Alto Medical Clinic. Coordination of the program is being handled by Dr. Robert Armbruster, Director of the Clinic’s Depart- ment of Environmental Medicine, The Clinic, in turn, has subcontracted certain special tests to the Stanford Medical Center, Stanford University. One visual sensitivity test is being administered by the Bioengineering Group of the Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory of SRI. The testing procedures, outlined in Table 3, fall into seven categories: (1) General physical examination, including complete medical and family history. (2) Laboratory examinations, including SMA-12 panel blood chemistries, protein electrophoresis, blood lipid profile, urinalysis, serology, blood type and factor, pulmonary function screening, and 12-lead electrocardiogram.,. (3) Neurological examination, including comprehen- sive and electroencephalogram (sleeping and routine). (4) Audiometric examination, including comprehensive, Bekesy bone conduction, speech discrimination, and impedance bridge test. (5) Ophthalmologist examination, including compre- hensive, card testing, peripheral field test, muscle test, dilation funduscope, and indirect ophthalmoscopic and fundus examination. (6) Special visual examinations, including electro- retinogram, dark adaptation test, and visual contrast sensitivity. (7) EMI brain scan, 22 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100430001-0
reyweg TeOTpeW psoyueys @ OTUTLO [TZOTPOW OATY OTed @ uvog UTerg INT *L (IUS). AFYTATZTSUSS. JSeIyUCD TensTA (‘pew pxoyuezg) 3809 uoTZegdepe yazeq peyetduog—p} () (‘Pen pxropuejg) wWersoutzyero1zoaTy - SUOT}BVUTUeXY TenstA Tetoaedg *9 G@) 4— petnpeyos uoTeUTUeXS snpunz pue dTdoosomteyydo VO 9LTPUL ‘ adoosnpuny UOTIETTa 45901 aTOSnN 480} PLeTy LTereydtazeg SUTIZS91 preg aATSusayserduog 00791R000100430001 -0 uoTZeUuTUeXY ysTsoTomTeyzdg "¢ 380] osptaiq souepseduy UOTIVUTWTIOStp yooods uoTyONpuUOD suoq Assyog SoATSusyordu0g UoTIVUTMeXY OTAJeMOTpNY ‘Pp SsuT{NOL pue SuTdseets ‘uersoTeydaous01}0eTY oATSUETATdMOg | UOT}PEUTUBXY [BOT SOTOMMeEN °¢E ‘peot-zi WeIZOTPLBOOIIO9TY SuTuseesos uot oUNy AreuoWTNg Ioz,oey; pue adé pootq. AZBo0ToO1ag sosTeutin eTtyoad pTtdtT pooTg StsoxroydorjoeTS uT9z0rg SeTI,STueys pootqd Toeued gI-yNWS suoTj}euTuexg Axoqeaoqey ‘¢ _ £z0zsStyq ATTMeg Teotpeu eyzetduog UOTIVUTWeXY [BOTSAYG [Tearsuey “T Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96 *sroquouTaredxe *Q *2 ‘STOrjuod/sreuresT ‘9 - pH fsqoefqns ‘¢ - T# Touuosazog € eIqey  NOILVNIWVXa ‘IvOIGaN 1 “