dl OU 5. GIA-RDUPYO-UU/9 TROUOZ00030040-0 a : Parapsychology The experiment began with my branch chief and me briefing Targ and Puthoff in a motel. Later, at SRI, Price was briefed by Targ and Puthoff. Since Targ and “—~-—~—"puthoff presumably knew nothing about “URDF-3, this protocol’ guarded ‘against ~ cueing and/or telepathy. Initially Price was given only the geographic coordinates, a world atlas map marked with the approximate location of URDF-8, and told it was a Soviet RD&E test site. Overnight, he produced the drawing on the bottom right of Figure 1b. Price further mentioned this was a “damned big crane” because he saw a person walk by and he only came up to the axles on the wheels (note sketch on left, Figure 1b). This performance caught my attention; but with two more days of work, we never heard about the derricks. Eventually, a decision was needed. Because the ~orane was so impressive, my branch chief and I decided the derticks description requirement should be relaxed and we should continue. When the decision was made to make Price witting, I decided to test him. My branch chief and I sat in a conference room while Targ and Puthoff brought a smiling Pat Price into the room. I was introduced as the sponsor, and I immediately asked Price if he knew me. Yes. Name? Ken Kress. Occupation? Works for CIA. Since I was then a covert employee. the response was meaningful. After having Price sign a secrecy agreement, and some discussions, I confronted him again. I rolled out a large version of Figure la and asked if he had viewed this site. Yes, of course! ~ Why didn’t you see the four derricks? =” Ce i Wait, I'll check. Price closed his eyes, put on his glasses (he “sees” better that way) and in a few seconds answered: “I didn’t see them because they are not there any more.” Since my data were three or four months old, there was no rejoinder to the implied accusation that my data were not good. We proceeded and completed a voluminous data package. In a few weeks, the latest URDF-3 reconnaissance was checked. Two derricks were partially disassembled, but basically all four were visible. In general, most of Price’s data were wrong or could not be evaluated. He did, nevertheless, produce some amazing descriptions, like buildings then under construction, spherical tank sections, and the crane in Figure 1b. Two analysts, a photo interpreter at TAS# and a nuclear analyst at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratories agreed that Price’s description of the crane was accurate; the nuclear analyst wrote that “one: he, the subject, actually saw it through remote viewing, or two: he was informed what to draw by someone knowledgeable of URDF-3.”"* But, again, since there was so much bad information mixed in with the good, the overall result was not considered useful. As proof of remote viewing, the data are at best inconclusive. The ORD officers concluded that 1 W. T. Strand; C/ESO/IAS; Memorandum for Director, Office of Technical Service; Subject: Evaluation of Data on Semipalatinsk Unidentified R&D Facility No. 3, USSR; 20 August 1974 (SECRET). 18D. Stillman; Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory; “An Analysis of a Remote Viewing Experiment of URDF-3”; 4 December 1975 (CONFIDENTIAL). 12 : Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0 ge ape em ABH EIR TES VRE EIR ESO RE AERIS EE TEE OIE ET LE SE BA I nrcenks ee ee
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0 Parapsychology (a) TARGET SITE (b) CRANE COMPARISON Figure 1: Comparison of Target. Site and-Drawing- by Remote-Viewer.. -— . -- —-- =srereT 575310 3-78 CIA NOFORN WNINTEL ene IP TES TET HNPENE ERR SE TEU Oa eT COAT SETAE
angie Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0 Parapsychology since there were no control experiments to compare with, the data were nothing but lucky guessing. if began to doubt my own objectivity in evaluating the significance of paranormal “ abilities to intelligence collection. It was clear that the SRI contractors were claiming success while ORD advisors were saying the experiments were not meaningful because of poor experimental design. As a, check on myself, I asked for a critique of the investigation from a disinterested consultant, a theoretical physicist with broad intellectual background. His first task was to evaluate the field of parapsychology without knowledge of the CIA data. After he had completed this critique, I asked him - to- acquaint -himself with. the CIA data and then to reassess the field. The first ScemagI eM ORES HIRO AMY App. roved investigation produced genuine interest in paranormal functioning as a valid research area, After being acquainted with CIA data, his conclusion was, “ a large body of reliable experimental evidence points to the inescapable conclusion that extrasensory perception does exist as a real phenomenon, albeit characterized by rarity and lack of reliability.”"* This judgment by a competent scientist gave impetus to continue serious inquiry into parapsychology. Because of the general skepticism and the mixed results of the various operational experiments, a final challenge was issued by OTS management: OTS is not in the research business; do something of genuine operational significance. Price was chosen, and suggestions were solicited from operational personnel in both OTS and the DDO. An intriguing idea was selected from audio operational applications: the difficult and dangerous job of targeting and installing audio collection systems. A test to determine if remote viewing could help was suggested. The interiors of two foreign embassies were known to the audio teams who had made entries several years previously. Price was to visit these embassies by his remote viewing capability, locate the coderooms, and come up with information that might allow a member of the audio team to determine whether Price was likely to be of operational use in subsequent operations. Price was given operationally acceptable data such as the exterior photographs and the geographical coordinates of the embassies. ~ Soe In both cases, Price correctly located the coderooms. He produced copious data, such as the location of interior doors and colors of marble stairs and fireplaces that were accurate and specific. As usual, much was also vague and incorrect. Regardless, the operations officer involved concluded, “It is my considered opinion that this technique—whatever it is—offers definite operational possibilities. '* This result was reviewed within OTS and the DDO, and various suggestions for potential follow-on activities were formulated.* This package of requirements, plus the final results of the current contract, were reviewed at several meetings within OTS and ORD. The results of those meetings are as follows: 1. According to the ORD Project Officers, the research was not productive or even competent; therefore, research support to SRI was dropped. The Director “J. A. Ball; “An Overview of Extrasensory Perception”; Report to CIA, 27 January 1975. 8 C/AOB/OTS; Memorandum for the Record; Subject: Parapsychology /“Remote Viewing”; 20 April 1976 (SECRET). 16 Chief/Division D/DDO, Memorandum for C/D&E; Subject: Perceptual Augmentation Tech- niques; 24 January 1975 (SECRET), AC/SE/DDO; Memorandum for C/D&E; Subject: Perceptual Augmentation Testing; 14 January 1975 (SECRET); C/EA/DDO; Memorandum for Director of Technical Service; Subject: Exploration of Operational Potential of “Paranormals”; 5 February 1975 (SECRET); C/Libya/EL/NE/DDO, Memorandum for OTS/CB; Subject: Libyan Desk Requirement for Psychic Experiments Relating to Libya; 31 January 1975 (SECRET); Cl/Staff/DDO; Memorandum for the Record; Subject: SRI Experiment; 12 December 1974 (SECRET). 14 an
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0 si ‘tmtaceApproved.For Release-2003/04/18 “CIA: RDP96-00794 0002000300 40-0 a Parapsychology 26GRi of OTS felt the OTS charter would not support research; therefore, all Agency funding in paranormal research stopped. 2. Because of the mixed results, the operational utility of the capability was considered questionable but deserved further testing. 3. To achieve better security, all the operations-oriented testing with the contractor was stopped, and a personal services contract with Price was started. 4. Since I was judged to be a positively biased advocate of paranormal functioning, the testing and evaluation of Price would be transferred to a more pragmatic OTS operations psychologist. The OTS psychologist picked up his new responsibilities and chose to complete an unfinished DDO requirement. The origin of the requirement went back to the fall of 1974 when several OTS engineers became aware of the parapsychology project in OTS and had volunteered to attempt remote viewing. They passed initial remote viewing tests at SRI with some apparent successes. To test these OTS insiders further, I chose a suggested requirement to obtain information about a Libyan site described only by its geographic coordinates. The OTS engineers described new construction which could be an SA-3 missile training site.” The Libyan Desk officer was immediately impressed. He then revealed to me that an agent had reported essentially the same story. More coordinates were quickly furnished but were put aside by me. The second set of Libyan geographic coordinates was passed by the OTS psychologist to Price. A report describing a guerrilla training site was quickly returned. It contained a map-like drawing of the complex. Price described a related underwater sabotage training facility site several hundred kilometers away Ori the sea” coast. This information was passed to the Libyan Desk. Some data were evaluated immediately, some were evaluated only after ordering special reconnaissance cover- age. New information produced by Price was verified by the reconnaissance. The underwater sabotage training facility description was similar to a collateral agent’s report. The Libyan Desk officer quickly escalated the requirement to what was going on inside those buildings, the plans and intentions, etc.'8 The second requirements list was passed to Pat Price. Price died of a heart attack a few days later, and the program stopped. There have been no further ClA-sponsored intelligence collection tests. Since July, 1975, there has been only modest CIA and Intelligence Community Staff interest in parapsychology. The Office of Scientific Intelligence completed a study about Soviet military and KGB applied parapsychology.” During November of 1976, Director George Bush became aware that official Soviets were visiting and questioning Puthoff and Targ at SRI about their work in parapsychology. Mr. Bush requested and received a briefing on CIA’s investigations into parapsychology. Before there was any official reaction, he left the Agency. Various intelligence community groups, such as the Human Resources Subcommittee on R&D, have exhaustively reviewed parapsychology in CIA, DOD, and the open research, but have failed to conclude whither parapsychology is or is not a worthwhile area for futher _investiga-_ tion. Several proposals from SRI and other contractors were received by CIA but none were accepted. There are no current plans for CIA to fund parapsychology investigations. 1 OTS/SDB; Notes on Interviews with F. P., EL, C.J. KG. and V. C.. January 1975 (SECRET). “& DDO/NE; Memorandum for OTS/BAB; Subject: Experimental Collection Activity Relating to Libya; 8 October 1975 (SECRET). 8 T. Hamilton; LSD/OSI; “Soviet and East European Parapsychology Research,” S1'77+10012,-April, 1977 (SECRET /NOFORN). 15
ene Parapsychology Postscript At this point, I have traced the action and reaction of various elements of CIA to what is certainly an unconventional and highly controversial subject. Also of interest are the concurrent reactions of other agencies to parapsychology. In August, 1978, parapsychology was discussed with several members of DIA. The DIA people were basically interested in the Soviet activities in this area. and expressed considerable interest in our own fledgling results. Numerous meetings have oceurred during the past several years. DIA remains interested on a low priority basis. The Army Materiel Command learned of CIA interest in the paranormal. We discovered the Army interest was generated by data which emerged from Vietnam. Apparently certain individuals called point men, who led patrols into hostile territory, had far fewer casualties from booby traps and ambushes than the average. These point men, needless to say, had a loyal following of men and, in general, greatly helped the morale of their troops under a brutal, stressful situation. The Army gave extensive physical and psychological tests to a group of unusually successful point men and came to no conclusion other than perhaps that paranormal capabilities may be the explanation! The Army was most interested in CIA results and wanted to stay closely informed. After a few more follow-up meetings, the Army Materiel Command was never heard from again. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) reported that they had not only a showing of interest but a hostile response as well to the subject area. At one time, we felt we had the strong interest of some people at DARPA to discuss our data. The SRI contractors and I went to a briefing where we had a several-hour confrontation with an assemblage of hostile DARPA people who had been convened especially to. debunk our-results. After a long, inconclusive, emotional discussion. we left. Contacts with DARPA stopped for several years. The Navy reviewed part of the work and became interested. Some groups developed strong interest, and minor funding was provided to SRI by Navy to replicate one of SRI’s earlier experiments under more controlled conditions. The experiment was replicated. Then the Navy asked SRI to repeat the same experiment under different conditions. An effect was observed, but it was not the same as the previous observations. About this same time, the Navy became very concerned about this research being “mind warfare’-related. Funding was stopped. The active funding for parapsychology now has shifted to the Air Force’s Foreign Technology Division with the addition of modest testing being completed by another group at DARPA. These investigations are not yet completed, but a second phase is funded by the Air Force. The Air Force project is attempting to evaluate whether signals and communications can be sent and received by paranormal functioning. Also aircraft and missile intelligence which can be verified is being gathered and evaluated. To date the results are more consistent than those seen during the CIA research, but still they are mixed. Some simple experiments seemed very impressive and conclusive. The more complex experiments are difficult to assess. In the non-government world an explosion of interest in unclassified parapsychol- ogy research occurred after the first publication of CIA-sponsored projects. Books have been written, prestigious professional societies have had sessions on parapsychology, 16 quart Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0
eae os Ap proved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000200030040-0 Parapsychology and several national news reports have been broadcast and printed.** Director Turner revealed publicly that CIA has had operational interest in parapsychology.*! The open publication of these investigations is generally healthy and helpful. It shows a reduction of associated emotionalism and bias. These publications will also stimu:ate other scientific investigations into parapsychology. There is a less positive aspect to open interest and publications. Before adeqate assessment was made by CIA and others, we may have allowed some imporzant national security information out into the public domain. It is my opinion that, as it relates to intelligence, sufficient understanding and assessment of parapsychology nas not been achieved. There are observations, such as the original magnetic experiments at Stanford University, the OSI remote viewing, the OTS-coderoom experiments, and others done for the Department of Defense, that defy explanation. Coincidence is not likely, and fraud has not been discovered. The implication of these data cannot be determined until the assessment is done. If the above is true, how is it that the phenomenon remains controversial and receives so little official government support? Why is it that the proper assessment was never made? This state of affairs occurs because of the elementary understanding of parapsychology and because of the peculiarities of the intelligence and milicarv organizations which have attempted the assessments. There is no fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of paranormal functioning, and the reproducibility remains poor. The research and experiments have successfully demonstrated abilities but have not explained them nor made them reproducible. Past and current support of parapsychology comes from applications-oriented intelligence and military agencies. The people managing such agencies demand quick and relevant results. The intelligence and military agencies, thérefore, press for results before there is sufficient ' experimental reproducibility or understanding of the physical mechanisms. Unless there is a major breakthrough in understanding, the situation is not likely to change as long as applications-oriented agencies are funding parapsychology. Agencies must commit long-term basic research funds and learn to confine attention to testing only abilities which at least appear reproducible enough to be used to augment other hard collection techniques (example: use parapsychology to help target hard intelligence collection techniques and determine if the take is thereby increased). Parapsychology, like other technical issues, can then rise or fall on its merits and not stumble over bureaucratic charters and conjectures proposed by people who are irrevocably on one side or the other in the controversial area. 2 R. Targ and H. Puthoff; “Information Transfer Under Conditions of Sensory Shielding”; Nature, CC LIL, 602-607 (October 18, 1974); H. Puthoff and RB. Targ; “A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer Over Kilometer Distances; Historical Perspective and Recent Research”; Proceedings of the IEEE, LXIV (March 1976, Number 8, 329-354); R. Targ and H. Puthoff; “Mind-Research Scientists Look at Psychic Ability”; Delacarte Press (1977); J. Wilhelm; “The Search for Superman”; Dell (1974); IEEE Conference on Man; Systems and Cybernetics; Washington (1976 and 1977); NBC Nightly News; 4 and 5 August 1976; NBC Today; 9 August 1976; J. Wilhelm, “Psychic Spying?”: The Washington Post, Outlook Section, August 7, 1977. _* J, O'Leary, “Turner Denies CIA Bugging of South Korea's Park,” The Washington Star, 9 August nn 17