SUBLIMINAL COMMUNICATION Silverman, L. H. Apr. 1979. The unconscious fantasy as therapeu- o tic agent in psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of American Aca- ~ demic Psychoanalysis, 7 (2), 189-218. Silverman, L. H. 1979. Two unconscious fantasies as mediators of © successful psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory and Prac- & tice, 16, 215-230. Silverman, L. H. 1978. Further comments on matters relevant to p24 investigations of subliminal phenomena: A reply. Perceptual and © Motor Skills, 27 (3), 1343-50. Stiverman, L. H. Sept. 1976. Psychoanalytic theory: ‘‘The reports Q of my death are greatly exaggerated.”’ American Psychologist, K- 31 (9), 621-37. SIverman, L. H. 1975. On the role of laboratory experiments in «© the development of the clinical theory of psychoanalysis: Data 2 on the subliminal activation of aggressive and merging wishes Qin schizophrenics. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 2 (1), 43-64. Siverman, L. H. Dec. 1975. An experimental method for the study O of unconscious conflict: A progressive report. British Journal — of Medical Psychology, 8 (4), 291-98. Silverman, L. H. 1972. Drive stimulation and psychopathology: & On the conditions under which drive-related external events o evoke pathological reactions. Psychoanalysis and Contempo- =4 rary Science, 1, 306-26. Silverman, L. H. Mar. 1971. An experimental technique for the 4 study of unconscious conflict. British Journal of Medical Psy- © chology, 44 (1), 17-25. verman, L. H. Jan. 1970. Further experimental studies of dynamic (& propositions in psychoanalysis: On the function and meaning 5} of regressive thinking. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic lL Association, 18 (1), 102-24. Silverman, L. H. Apr. 1966. A technique for the study of > psychodynamic relationships: the effects of subliminally pre- 9 sented aggressive stimuli on the production of pathological think- Sing in a schizophrenic population. Journal of Consulting Psy- < chology (U. S.), 30 (2), 103. Silverman, L. H., and Lachmann, F. M. Jan. 1985. The therapeutic properties of unconscious oneness fantasies: Evidence and treat- ment implications. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 21 (1), 91-115. 124 RECOMMENDED READINGS Silverman, L. H., and Weinberger, J. Dec. 1985. Mommy and J are one. Implications for psychotherapy. American Psychology,c$0 (12), 1296-308. = Silverman, L. H.; Lachmann, F. M.; and Milich, R. H. 1984. Undgn- scious oneness fantasies: Experimental findings and implicatif}s for treatment. International Forum for Psychoanalysis, 1 &), 107-52. ° Silverman, L. H.; Lachmann, F. M.; and Milich, R. H. 19844in response. International Forum for Psychoanalysis, 1 8), 205-217. ms Silverman, L. H.; Martin, A.; Ungaro, R.; and Mendelsohn, E. Jae 1978. Effect of subliminal stimulation of symbiotic fantasieseon behavior modification treatment of obesity. Journal of Consiitt- ing and Clinical Psychology, 46 (3), 432-41. S Silverman, L. H.; Ross, D. L.; Adler, J. M.; and Lustig, D. A. JRne 1978. Simple research paradigm for demonstrating sublimpral psychodynamic activation: effects of oedipal stimulation on dagt- throwing accuracy in college males. Journal of Abnormal Rgy- chology, 87 (3), 341-57. Silverman, L. H.; Bronstein, A.; and Mendelsohn, E. Spring 196. The further use of the subliminal psychodynamic activaton method for the experimental study of the clinical theory of Sy- choanalysis: On the specificity of the relationship between sy@p- toms and unconscious. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research @ed Practice, 13 (1), 2-16. @ Silverman, L. H.; Levinson, P.; Mendelsohn, E.; Ungaro, R.; amd Bronstein, A. A. Dec. 1975. A clinical application of sublimiggal psychodynamic activation. On the stimulation of symbiotic fitn- tasies as an adjunct in the treatment of hospitalized schizophign- ics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 161 (6), 379, 82. Silverman, L. H.; Frank, S. G.; and Dachinger, P. June 1974B.A psychoanalytic reinterpretation of the effectiveness of syst ea atic desensitization: Experimental data bearing on the role=of merging fantasies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83 &, 313-18. <x Silverman, L. H.; Kwawer, J. S.; Wolitzky, C.; and Coron, M. Aug. 1973. An experimental study of aspects of the psychoanalytic theory of male homosexuality. Journal of Abnormal Psychol- ogy (U.S.), 82 (1), 178-89. 125
SUBLIMINAL COMMUNICATION Silverman, L. H.; Linger, H.; Lustbader, L.; Farrell, J.; and Martin, oA. D. June 1972. Effects of subliminal drive stimulation on the ~—speech of stutterers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Su. $.), 155 (1), 14-21. Silverman, L. H.; Candell, P.; Pettit, T. F.; and Blum, F. A. 1971. 3 Further data on effects of aggressive activation and symbiotic 4 merging on ego functioning of schizophrenics. Perceptual and © Moior Skills, 32, 93-94. Siverman, L. H., and Candell, P. 1970. On the relationship between x aggressive activation, symbiotic merging on ego functioning of ® schizophrenics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 93-94. Siverman, L. H., and Candell, P. May 1970. On the relationship oO @ between aggressive activation, symbiotic merging, intactness of @ body QJ/ournal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 150 (5), 387-99. Sfiverman, L. H.; Spiro, R. H.; Weisbert, J. $.; and Candell, P. << 1969. The effects of aggressive activation and the need to merge O on pathological thinking in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous —4and Mental Disease, 148 (1), 39-51. Siverman, L. H., and Silverman, S. E. Feb. 1967. The effects of S subliminally presented drive stimuli on the cognitive function- Sing of schizophrenics. Journal of Projective Techniques Per- © sonal Assessment (U. S.), 31 (1), 78-85. Siiverman, L. H., and Spiro, R. H. June 1967. Further investiga- % tion of the effects of subliminal aggressive stimulation on the ego functioning of schizophrenics. Journal of Projective Tech- © niques Personal Assessment (U. S.), 31 (3), 225-33.  verman, L. H., and Spiro, R. H. 1967. Some comments and data Pon the partial cue controversy and other matters relevant to oinvestigations of subliminal phenomena. Perceptual and Motor 2 Skills, 25 (1), 325-338. fAverman, L. H., and Goldweber, A. M. 1966. A further study of Othe effects of subliminal aggressive stimulation on thinking. <Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143 (6), 463-72. Silverman, L. H., and Shiro, R. H. Jan. 1963. The effects of sub- liminal, supraliminal and vocalized aggression on the ego func- tioning of schizophrenics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Dis- ease (U. S.), 146 (1), 50-61. 126 RECOMMENDED READINGS Singh, Y., and Devi, R. M. Jan.-July 1976. Subliminal guessing: A communication of collegiate students. Psycho-Lingua, 6 (1-2, 23-28. = Skean, S. R. May 1978. Videotape presentation of subliminal stim ulation based on galvanic skin response monitoring: An invg- tigation in counselor education. Dissertation Abstracts Inf- national, 38 (11-A), 6547. 4 Smith, C. D. Dec. 1982. Effects of subliminal stimulation on coe- ative thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43 (6-), 2004. a Smith, G. J.; Gudmund, J.; Carlsson, I.; and Danielsson, A. 1983. Identification with another person: Manipulated by meand>f subliminal stimulation. Scandinavian Journal of Psycholdgy, 26 (1), 74-87. P-4 Smith, G. J., and Danielsson, A. 1979. The influence of anxiety&n the urge for aesthetic creation: An experimental study utilizpg subliminal stimulation and a percept-genetic technique. Pyy- chological Research Bulletin, Lund Univ., 19 (3-4), 36. oO Smith, G.J., and Danielsson, A. 1979. A test of identification using subliminal stimulation in a metacontrast design: Preliminary ¥al- idation with sensitive-paranoid and borderline subjects. Bsy- chological Research Bulletin, Lund Univ., 19 (9-10), 23. © Smith, R. B. Apr. 1979. The effects of the incidental perceptiog>f rhythm on task performance and mood. Dissertation Abstré@ts International, 39 (10-B), 5049-50. o Soininen, K., and Jarvilehto, T. Nov. 1983. Somatosensory evok@d potentials associated with tactile stimulation at detection thregh- old in man. Electroencephalogr Clinical Neurophysiology, we? (5), 494-500. _ Somekh, D. E. Noy. 1976. The effect of embedded words i®a brief visual display. British Journal of Psychology, 67 i 529-35. g Somekh, D. E., and Wilding, J. M. Aug. 1973. Perception with@t awareness in a dichoptic viewing situation. British Journakaf Psychology, 64 (3), 339-49. = Sommer, L. Mar. 1986. The effects of subliminal psychodynamic activation on verbal time estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (9-B), 3231. Spence, D. P. 1983. Subliminal effects on lexical decision time. Archiv fiir Psychologie, 135 (1), 67-72. 127
SUBLIMINAL COMMUNICATION Spence, D. P. 1967. Subliminal perception and perceptual defense: © 2 sides of a single problem. Bebavioral Science, 12 (3), 183-93. xSpence, D. P. and Smith, G. J. Aug. 1977. Experimenter bias against © subliminal perception? Comments on a replication. British Jour- § nal of Psychology, 68 (3), 279-80. 3piro, T. W. May 1976. The effects of subliminal symbiotic stim- © ulation and strengthening self boundaries of schizophrenic pathol- © ogy. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36 (11-B), 5818-19. Stambrook, M., and Martin, D. G. 1983. Brain laterality and the & subliminal perception of facial expression. International Jour- GS nal Neuroscience, 18 (1-2), 45-58. Pyteinberg, R. J. Oct. 1975. The effects of subliminal mother- need © tachistoscopic stimulation on the ego pathology of hospitalized ‘8 male schizophrenics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36 O (4-B), 1934. Cxrauch, I., et al. 1976. The impact of meaningful auditory signals © on sleeping behavior. Archiv fiir Psychologie, 128 (1-2), 75-95. Strauss, H. 1968. A phenomenological approach to the subcon- scious. Nordisk Psykologi, 20 (4), 203-6. wtross, L., and Shevrin, H. Jan. 1969. Hypnosis as a method for investigating unconscious thought processes. A review of research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Assoc (U.S.), 17 (1), 100-135. tross, L., and Shervin, H. 1968. Thought organization in hypno- sis and the waking state. Journal of Nervous and Mental Dis- ease, 147 (3), 272-88. Sutphen, D. 1982. Battle for Your Mind (Transcript from speech ® delivered to World Congress of Hypnotists). Malibu, Calif.: Val- o~ ley of the Sun Publishing. Swanson, R. J. May 1981. The effects of oedipally related stimuli LL. in the subliminal psychodynamic activation paradigm: A repli- 3 cation and an extension. Dissertation Abstracts International, > 41 (11-B), 4279. Baris, L. J. Nov. 1970. Subliminal perception: An experimental Q. study to determine whether a science concept can be taught < subliminally to fourth grade pupils. Dissertation Abstracts International, 31 (5-A), 2199. Taylor, E. 1988. Subliminal Learning: An Eclectic Approach. Salt Lake City: Just Another Reality Publishing. Taylor, E. 1987. Subliminal Technology. Salt Lake City: PAR, Inc. :C se 2000/08/1 128 tl A hr Rt RR tt RECOMMENDED READINGS Taylor, E. July 1986. Holistic approach to hypnosis. Attain. Spring- field, Louisiana. 2 Thuerer, J. R. Apr. 1985 Computer-assisted spelling: A sublingial methodology to increase cognitive performance and acad&hic self-concept. Dissertation Abstract International, 45 (1ORA), 3074. ° Tomlinson, K. Jan. 1983. Just snore that weight off. Los Angges, 28 (2), 206. =4 Trank, D. M. 1976. Subliminal Stimulation: Hoax or Reality? Sfidy ptepared at Univ. of Iowa. N Trieber, E. J. Aug. 1984. The effects of supraliminal stimulftion combined with subliminal symbiotic stimuli on academic er- formance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (2B), 688-89. 2 Trimble, R., and Eriksen, C. W. 1966. ‘‘Subliminal cues’’ andthe Muller-type illusion. Perception and Psychophysics, 1 @f1), 401-4. < Tripe, B. Validity in subliminal messages? Professionals terfd to disagree. United Press International. — Tyrer, P.; Lewis, P.; and Lee, I. Feb. 1978. Effects of sublingmal and supraliminal stress on symptoms of anxiety. Journal of Ser- vous and Mental Disease, 166 (2), 88-95. o Tyrer, P.; Horn, S.; and Lee, I. Feb. 1978. Treatment of agoragho- bia by subliminal and supraliminal exposure to phobiccine fNm. Lancet, 1 (8060), 358-60. 4 Ungaro, R. Apr. 1982. The role of ego strength and alterndfive subliminal messages in behavioral treatment of obesity. Digger- tation Abstracts International, 42 (10-B), 4215-16. a Valind, B., and Valind, L. 1968. Effects of subliminal stimulaGon on homographs. Psychological Research Bulletin, 88, 89. u- VandenBoogert, C. 1984. A study of potentials unlimited subpm- inai persuasion/seif-hypnosis tapes. Potentiais Unlimited, Be. Grand Rapids, Michigan. 5. Varga, M. P. Feb. 1974. An experimental study of aspects ofthe psychoanalytic theory of elation. Dissertation Abstracts Inier- national, 34 (8-B), 4062-63. VideoNews. 22 July 1983, pp. 4-5. Environmental video has intro- duced a subliminal persuasion videocassette that superimposes low-level video messages on cassette tapes. 179
SUBLIMINAL COMMUNICATION Walker, A. Dec. 1979. Music and the unconscious. British Medt- 2 cal Journal, 2 (6205), 1641-43. ayall Street Journal. 3 Star, Eastern (Princeton, N.J.) Edition, Sept. =4 30, 1983, p. 33. Simutech has introduced a device to change ® behavior by subliminal suggestion. atson, G. B. 1970. Motor response latency as an indicator of 3 subliminal affective stimulation. Journal of General Psychol- S ogy, 82 (2), 139-43. atson, J. P. Dec. 1975. An experimental method for the study of ~ Unconscious conflict. British Journal of Medical Psychology, @ 49 (4), 299-301. Wechsler, R. Feb. 1987. A new prescription: Mind over malady. ' Discover Magazine. est, G. N. July 1985. The effects of auditory subliminal ra psychodynamic activation on state anxiety. Dissertation & Abstracts International, 46 (1-B), 319. Westerlundh, B. 1985. Subliminal influence on imagery: Two © exploratory experiments. Psychological Research Bulletin, Lund -+ Univ., 24 (6-7), 31. whalen, B. Mar. 1985. ‘Threshold messaging’ touted as antitheft oo measure. Marketing News, 19 (6), 5-6. Whittaker, R. 1975. Subliminal perception: Myth or magic? Edu- © cational Broadcasting, 8 (6), 17-22. Giener, M., and Kleespies, P. Dec. 1968. Some comments and ® data on partial cue controversy and other matters relevant to # investigations of subliminal phenomena: A rejoinder. Percep- © tual and Motor Skills (U. 8.), 27 (3), 847-56. Qvilliams, L. J., and Evans, J. R. Feb. 1980. Evidence for percep- x tual defense using a lexical decision task. Perceptual Motor 2 Skills, 50 (1), 195-98. winnett, R. L. Dec. 1981. The comparative effects of literal meta- g phorical subliminal stimulation on the activation of oedipal fan- O tasies in dart-throwing performance and word recall tasks. Dis- ©. sertation Abstracts International, 42 (6-B), 2557. Holman, B. B., ed. 1973. Handbook of General Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Worthington, A. G. June 1966. Generalization phenomena associ- ated with previous pairings of UCS (shock) and subliminal visual stimuli. Journal of Personal Social Psychology (U.S.), 3 (6), 634. 0 14N RECOMMENDED READINGS Worthington, A. G., and Dixon, N. F. 1968. Subthreshold percep- tion of stimulus meaning. American Journal of Psychology381 (3), 453-56. ° Zanot, E. J.; Pincus, J. D.; and Lamp, E. J. 1983. Public per&p- tions of subliminal advertising. Journal of Advertising, 12 2); 39-45. ° Zanot, E. J., and Maddox, L. M. July 1983. Subliminal advertignng and education. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of@he Association for Education in Journalism (65th, Athens, OfRo, July 25-28, 1982). N Zenhausern, R.; Pompo, C.; and Ciaiola, M. Apr. 1974. Sin@le and complex reaction time as a function of subliminal ahd supraliminal accessory stimulation. Perceptual and M@pr Skills (U. S.), 38 (2), 417-18. > Zenhausern, R., and Hansen, K. Apr. 1974. Differential effedhof subliminal and supraliminal accessory stimulation on task cOfn- ponents in problem-solving. Perceptual and Motor Skis (U. S.), 39 (2), 375. O Zenhausern, R.; Ciaiola, M.; and Pompo, C. Aug. 1973. Sublimi- nal and supraliminal accessory stimulation and two trapezoid illusions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37 (19), 251-56. © Zingirian, M.; Molfino, A.; Levialdi, S.; and Trillo, M. 1971. Mogc- ular and binocular responses to liminal and subliminal stingdli. Ophthalmologica (Switzerland), 162 (1), 41-50. a Zuckerman, S. G. June 1981. An experimental study of under- achievement: The effects of subliminal merging and succegs- related stimuli on the academic performance of bright unger- achieving high school students. Dissertation Abstrgects International, 41 (12-B), 4699-4700. - Zwosta, M. F., and Zenhausern, R. June 1969. Application ofisie- nal detection theory to subliminal and supraliminal accessory stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills (U. 8.), 28 (3), 699-¥o. fe) = joe joe x 121