Approved For Release 2000/08^n^^^^^^^R000500550001 -7
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION DCC-79
1.
(S/NOFORN)
This report documents
a remote viewing session conducted
compliance with
a request for information.
?
( S/NOFORN)
The remote
viewer's impressions of
the target are provided
the information provided is
the responsibility of
the requestor.
(S/NOFORN)
The protocol used for this session
Grill Flame Protocol,
AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing
is detailed in
the document
Protocol
(S),
undated.
4.
(S/NOFORN)
Following is
the remote viewing session,
the remote viewer.
a transcript of
the viewer's impressions during
At TAB
A is target cuing information provided
NOT RE
H
NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 tCIa5
!
[000500550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/Qg^2p
EA0050055000 1 -7
transcript
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION DCC-79
TIME
#14:
#01 :
#14:
#01 :
#14:
#01 :
#14:
#01 :
#14:
#01 :
+05
#14:
This will be a remote viewing session for 24 June
1981.
Mission time
is 0900 hours.
Test.
AU riaht #01,
this will be
a pre-mission briefing.
I've
shLn you
"photograph of a U.S. Embassy In a foreign country
that you have worked against before.
In addition,
I ye shown
vou Dhotos of six individuals who are employed at
this embassy.
During the session
I will ask you specific questions about
each individual.
And they're numbered from
^hrou gh
s
x,
from the
top left hand
to
the right,
and the bottom lett
h
to
the right.
Any questions?
No.
Okay.
You've got 50 minutes
to prepare yourself this morning.
All riqht #01,
the
time
is now 0900 hours.
I would like you
now
to focus on individual number
one.
Focus on individual
number one and tell me should U.S.
Intelligence be concerned
about this individual? *.
-hmt
a minute
No,
I don't get a feeling for that.
I
get like
a,
uh. . .disassociated feeling for this person, but
I don’t get any feelings
of
concern.
Okay #01,
I would
like you now
to focus °n
^e
two!
And again,
the question
is should U.S.
Intelligence
b
concerned about this individual?. ....
I don't get any feelings about this individual either.
All riqht #01,
individual number three.
Should U.S.
Intelli-
gence be concerned about individual number three.....
st andpoint^^I t^s
S
more
C
of
C
a
r
characterization
.^n
i
e
get"a
n
very
»
g
iin
a
a of^sternness^andt^^'thickheadedness' with X*.u£ne.
and'sorUsrr^t^fseHng of psychological imbalance.
Cen't expect mistakes from this person....
All right #01,
I would
like you now to focus on
iri^^lSence
number
four,
individual number four.
Should U.S.
Intellige
be concerned about this individual....
Approved For Release 2000/08/0
500550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07"
0550001-7
+20
..m
.
T
aet a
..two impressions when,
uh,
I
look at this individual.
#01
*
fifst ii ^ssion'was picture of a Trojan ho.se.
gift package
Second impression was close relationship
to one of
the °the
six...
I
think this person ought to be
very
can't make up my mind for sure about the... I
get reeling
espionage with this person but I'm not sure which side...
I don't understand
the symbolism of
the Trojan horse,
that's very clear...
That's all
I
get for this person.
jnil .
A1 i
riqht #01,
let's move on
to person number five.
Should
SiL
Intelligence be concerned about individual number five?
Ml.
First impression’s a name.,-Sandy
«Sandra
something Hke that.^
of concern.
#14:
All right #01-
jfni
.
nettinq,
uh... getting visions of mountains when
I
see her for
*
Some
reason.
Looks
like lower Bavarian mountains..
Then
I
saw
cook,
something
to do with cooking.
#14-
Okay #01 ,
let's move on
to individual number six.
Should
#
U.s!
Intelligence be concerned about this individual?...
#01:
First image is a distinct yes.
See
a,
see relationship with
individual four.
She's holding,
uh...just,
uh,
get vision
of her holding fragmentary documents in mind.
Memory work...
Ge
Vab?v
tr
°thL!fuftl1?nu[::!^ lust gX’a
feeling.
She's tied very closely
to person
^
t
just a minute.
There's something else here and
I
m try
isolate
it.
#14:
We'll wait.....
#01:
Get a feeling like shee' s alread:y ,
uh,
a^
8B
nf Qome kind for U.S.,
for U.S.,
un, .enori.
x
D
v
sms
me-
I
can't tell who's handling who.
She has the »»«.
«
contacts
of the
group of
six.
That
s all
g
o,
am
t
,„oni
T'd like you now to move forward in time..
#14:
Okay #01,
>
j. mu._ r
iggi,
I would like you
to
forward xn time
to 30 September
lyui.
i
.
.
'
indi-
focus on these individuals and tell me if all of these
viduals are still employed at the embassy
- rxsi» s-xir^arT&wss.t'
I
see none of
the others...
Approved For Release 2000/08/0^j
100550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07jJgtA
500550001-7
#14:
+25
OgjflgT
Would it help
if we
took each one at
a time?
#01:
No.
#14:
Okay.
You
say individual number four is moved?
#01:
Moved.
#14:
Can you tell me where
or why?
jtm
.
That's what I'm looking at.
Just
a minute...
I
get a sense
m -
^
with family.
I don't know if it's
at-e
or relative away.
This’ll be,
uh...this will be his reason
for not being there.
Individual one
I
clearly have there
irfseptember?
Individual
two,
three ...two and three an In.
are not
there,
I don't see them at all.
Individual five
may still be there, but sick.
I
get like homesick.
Getting
like
a hypochondria feeling about her
too.
I
get,
she
s
routinely sick for some reason.
Getting
a
tie m between
four and^six again.
I don't know why,
I
just sense
that six
leaves,
or Tout leaves,
or
they both leave
the same time...
I don't know why.
jtu.
okay.
I have one final question,
then
I
still want you
to
maintain your focus
of
30 September
81.
Do you pick up any
strong"sslings,
any strong feelings of any of these ihdivr-
duals under
a great deal of stress or concern about their
future at this time
in September? ....
#01:
Person six.
I don 't know why ,
I
just get that.
.
.
Had
a,
uh,
iust
a flip impression
of individual one as well.
That was,
uh,
only for an
instant, went away.
There may be some pressure on
individual one as well, but not as much as
six......
Uh,
additional item on six. are, uh, ^keys.
I
don t,
it 8
thina important about keys with individual six.
Just the
iort keys° and I'm not sure if it's oode keys or door keys or...
key questions or what they
are but keys,
the word keys.
That's all I'm getting.
#M
' ^n^lSy^^
we^re°doing
C
the°sessiont I'd’ like y^u now to take
a
deep breath, stretch your arms,
stretch your legs.
He 11
pause now while we prepare
to draw.
All righty,
we're now ready
for debrief.
If you would run
over
the people again.
#01:
Okay.
I might have some problems
' cause
I
don't remember
u/hat
I
say
in
roy
sessions.
#14-
okav
I’ve got some notes here,
I
can help you.
Uh,
on number
one you described
the person as having
a f
s^?°^ed feeling,
but that you didn't have any threat
to U.S.
Intelligence.
Approved For Release 2000/08/0
0550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/QS
•§0500550001-7
#01 s
#14 :
#01 :
# 14 :
#01 :
#14 :
#01 :
Right.
I,
uh.
. .that should be
I had
a disassociated feeling
about the person.
Uh...I
think,
uh,
it would be better m
the way
of debrief
to make some additional
comments,
probably.
I
get
a strong feeling that there are
a couple control people
in
this
qroup here.
Control people
I
mean,
you know,
th
were probably under no suspicion or were just picked at random
to be entered
in with
the
group
so that there can be
some
kind of check or whatever.
And like person number^two,
I
got,
I don’t know what
I
got about person number
two, but it musta
been zero.
Yeah,
you mentioned you had no feeling for concern,
that's
the
only
thing you mentioned.
Yeah
It's like,
I
think person number
two might be just
a,
uh,
you^know,
like at. I'm not so sure about U.5.
citizen
o,: not
but, you know,
they're
just thrown m here for
the control
purpose.
Uh,
number three you mentioned that there was some
concern,
but not from an
Intel standpoint.
Yeah, but not from an Intelligence standpoint.
I
have concern
for this oerson from a psychological balance standpoint,
for
sometlZT
l don't
k
P
noi if that's a..result of
the person
beinq psychologically imbalanced or.. a result of
the.. person
having
P
been psychologically imbalanced.
I
don
t know which.
I don't know how to explain
that.
Okay.
Number four,
you seemed
to have
s°me
elated
symbology.
Picture of
a Trojan horse, which you felt related
something like
a gift package.
Interesting thing,
though... all
the espionage
every thinq
I have about this person,
this man,. I
don
t have
anv Itrong negativism in that feeling.
I
had
the espionage
feeling,
I had
the Trojan horse,
the
gift package,
the involve
ment in espionage and all this sort of thing, but for some
reason I'm not getting
a negative feeling with
that.
ou
<now,
it's almost as if- I'm not getting a feeling on whose side
he's
on.
You know?
It's almost as if he might beworking
fn-r us
doino it for us,
that sort of
thing.
And in that
event
that he
is,
then I'm not getting any kind of
a negative
thing that he's like been rolled or anything like
that.
So...
#14 :
#01 :
#14 :
#01:
Okay.
Number five.
I
got more personality feelings about this person than
I
did
anything else.
Yeah,
you even mentioned
a name- Sandy.
And,
uh ... I didn't get any,
uh,
any bad vibes about her.
Approved For Release 2000/08/0?
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION DCC-79
(S/NOFORN)
Prior
to
the remote viewing session
the remote viewer was
shown photographs
of
a U.S.
Embassy and of six personnel who are employed
at this embassy.
2.
(S/NOFORN).
During the session the remote viewer was asked xf USI
should
be concerned about any or all of the personnel shown.
(S/NOFORN)
The viewer was then asked
to move forward in_time
to
30 September 1981 and determine if any
of
the above personnel have left the
employment of
the
U.S.
Embassy.
4.
(S/NOFORN)
Attached are copies of
the photographs shown
to the remote
viewer prior
to this session*
NOT
RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000/08/07\uJl
000500550001-7
SG1A Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500550001-7