SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2000^08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787R0007001100iJ-2
CC.FIDr.ifLiL
19 October 1974
‘•••£‘*0 FOR
TRli HiSCORD
1 T '.-:v^n
sv
3IlJL
rajfa n0j?rr*2 .1
i
0 s g?,
ch
15 ~ 13 October 1979 Trio Renta
n
I
hou^s
p t SHI
nn
l %
spen„
3, total
ox
twenty
d.
l
o.u
on ±3
“*
1/
Octooe-r.
du'H ^
•
->
^
n
,
were heM
r-Hn«-Hiv t^j-u
nj>
‘
T,nic ‘ i ‘
a
s ~~~e ^
°-
general discussions
T
n
'
^
"?
ly W1 °n mhoif and TarS and to a nuch
l esse- ext-nt «<+h Cn-~
a-d Jones, aoout mst Performance a^d achipvo^^.
_ 1V1
”,
“
x
;
,J* n Uo^
-research and
+h P
Tr
It' * J
,
^cnxev8menuS ^
current status of the
r?vj!± -f
une ^e
l
oa^°
0i
tnat
+-°
°e accomplished in the time remind
-e
TJ**ri?iS?ai t
Protocols,
went over all the evidence
t e ntative ^olans we^~P?le
!?ok ?art in thrse new ones,
and
early December.
In eddUion" whUe mjSMS^^ tj-°a
. ^ «asninpon, probably in
during the afternoon>17 Oc^o^^^Bu
f
3 a
?
oxher contractor
SMS*
s.
t°iV? 0af -'randsco on such short notice,
the
trio was usr'ul i. 477
anrtheiiVou4So4
S
Srin-°r *" *®?T
Ch a"d dallneaUn* both «<r expectations
> h
i
°
1 & h?
aunnp tne remainder of the effort.
While
the- weren’t
„°J ao
f|
lt tne criticality to them of linina-ur follow-on funds
oLnri‘
onihisihne--So? ?
*°“ “ »"**••
tSara «*5»* any undue
(
?oous
?
o? plessure
they aw cerSf;,:
r
,T* “* 00iMltnants <»«..
Indeed,
on balance,
isins.
In a not unrelated ve?n'7there
th“ I”°’
conclude
that (free the operators
^ ^pfbll nieTev^X,
^ y
eOenh
t-°haiOal'C03 “lerinents could be usefully exploded in
«*S
?• toR
e11 P'" ln this aspect was tk? I could
the na4 o- bS/otalt““RPPh“^oni
(and » S^uinely receptive attitude on
at least tiW -ane‘ dJ-nph-
°nly
1J
‘ >
se experiments could be replicated with
if there £- 5™
C
.CUra
.??. under fool:?roof protocols
(see below);
and
indicators f>fntn+ho
' >>'
pr°Vldin3 reasonaoly reliaole confidence-level
element of the tg
-10
-l p >!>
e,/
Ul
r?
sPGct to
t,lie probable accuracy of each
o—
wig rono ue- viewing nanra ti on ,
^
Current Status & Plans
re Basic Research
stating that'thpfgf^ J^lisSca^lv
th=. retuotl“ ^ 9 to 6 subjects by
simply wasn't enSugh^ tSLT^ £ne Jcoplfthru"^^^”
first .^talhs-that there
thru the ops
testing and that
l-hm ,
Pl >
u a11 the screening tests and then
its doubtful if they
‘ ll^ever^fullySzTJ? aT
^ the data
( ind= ed >
below), m any case
thev
f
analyze
the data which they already have-see
for the
3 so-called
’subjects’
and J q
er
n? ^ ^ thoroughly than 9 partially.
As
not
sticking to their guns
at the
out
iJ"
®d
7*'
’
th<2ir basic error was
in
phenomena
(as
in this
case')
von 1-^1 ^
that when you don't control the
thG
° “
,
“
f
,
’ y;
U_
S11,ply cannot
(ia
view) determine
in advance
who
the controls are to be.
( ,*!<,»«.;
r//*y wwv ,.v-wS
svww--
vvvewv
"Zs /7/ZA'si /Cs"'
s? /}
^
rv/s)*s
,.y ^
)
COriFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787R000700110021-2
SG1I
Approved For Release 2000/b8/07
: CIA-RDP96-0078?R0007001 1002(1-2
y
.
, ^ ./A
vr
\y
-m
3°
The Screening Tests
. Their reasons
for dropping
2 of the t^ho
:;
i.
,
follows;
the EEG-Strobe Light was
at best generating 10'2 figures 4n part
(hef
-
believe, because EEG signals
in general are
just
too noisy tf work wUh) aid
K;
el
d
? et f standard of 10'6 for psychic performance they saw no advantage in
•
•
y continuing to devote dwindling time to it;
the Laser Monitored Pendulm wfs L
"V f
vln* l0 '' fl Sures with Subjects # 1 and 2 but the major problem wafthat one S*
b
a
. tremendous number of trials in order to get statLticSly significant
‘ban in
Til ZT*T
‘he gradiometer
(where,
after 150 ruls!
gtting lo-l’witfsubl
fLf“
\
1 ySlnB
fR<-rt<ie<y
i
e<<
v.<™""
Wl°e
',,- ?he, remainln« screening tests are; Eemote
^LSKSlrSilCrfhfI “e
n
S
S^L“a
t
LtTeaZS
S^
qr
Sttboeo^“
(th0-r
' ve already“ lo4 -“ b? (p )!
a“
Subj ect
m.
#2
# 3
RV
Completed
(*)
1 done
2 done
TM
Completed
Completed
(*)
er done
M- 4
1r
#
# 6
Completed
(*)
done
LD
Completed
0;
Completed
(but
to be don
again w/ right protocol)
Completed
~
,
,,
.
d
Completed
o
coSle
rL
t
e
he“?or°arLj
4:lXa)? m
^ "P,
McSnftSif^ ZooTZflZ- Z
S™s2rof4S
e?^r
a
SGI
I
the later ones with
that
( in our oriSirLal conversations &
sarilv defSitlw
they ??to 4 fooused °a those figures
as being neces-
,
.
‘T
mitive
ana,
in any case,
they hadn't really analyzed enough data
at
that
tame
to make sound judgements about
the best"^^ber oflriaS
PT
1 T^f V
*, 1}
t
\
•
:4>
judged
a the Screening Tests. All of
'
suW and thel <SlftSe T?™}
e
<n
OI ,"hom wiP get the nlne transcripts from each
^planning
^io ZUT
Z
Z/XfZ
t°” ^vrihfSs
b
S<
ir'pissis'
<ran e<ZlT% w
6??
SUtJ;I'-
l>“t they are allowed unlimited numbel
EZzzzTzrr <
"/i zzziZnVtzzz 'tjt
went f.ld onlhf^iS?
+Vw,
5|. status of Medical,
Psychological & Mid-Test Neurophysiological Exams
matrices --about vhK “
^h
Halstead ReJtnn S
,
S
c°™^ts and clarifications
should be made:
the
arrangements bavT^ l
T
^ “ entry “ the Psych matrix and ^
a^ho all the
arrangements have been made,
none of the subjs have taken it yet
since Puthoff
(as
anr^omi2d
S
?rdfsriHb
eaSantn
g
S
f
eS ’
SGe bel°w) Wants to take
ifc himself f^st
subj # 2 returned frnm
hh
rn
ne
f
r
u
!<ure and then schedule all the subjects;
when
wnf-f-p
d
re ruined from the Electroretmogram he was almost
a basket case---aid
it
rest olTsZlZ\l?rZ
nZ
hZ
eVCr had "-and
^ZTtt Z tit
exception that Subj # 1 refused Zt tZTS “Te^J foc^n’f4
"e11
'"Z Z
i^T
er^
d
;EXPeriment
Gw
S but they intend t0 do five such exams on
a random
aS\
S
1iX
t
a
h
?las
aS TZliflJsT ^ ° f
SUbJ °° tS -
The <=uvrcnt status
in
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00787R000700110021-2