datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 0003001 9-5
21 Feb 1995
SGI
I
MEMO FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT
:
Michael Drillings
Office of Research and Development
Draft Task Statement
for NRC in Anticipation of
Request
for Military Liaison Support
Dear Michael
:
Enclosed
is. a draft task statement for NRC on this
Congressionally directed study which we discussed last week
on. the phone.
I don't know how realistic
it
is
to expect all
this
in three months and
I will do everything
I can to get
the program transfer deadline of
1 July extended.
I realize
this could impact both you and the NRC and will do everything
I can to mitigate that
impact.
In the mean time,
tell me
what you think.
Since you've been down this road before,
I
am eager to hear your advice.
I also will be very dependent
on your cooperation.
Give me a call when you've had a chance
to review the draft.
Thanks
SG1I
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 0003001 9-5
* : & Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : Re OCC oe PI d DATE: Q/ Ug G2 / ZF SG1A DZ RES fb SES a. KE Kes POWSES : bh. OFKER KE SROWSE S ~N a arta ue y. Mo0PERL MM OKER \pbecrtlic delay dev ffotA \4 Tit Co tl PVIE feo S ! Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100240001-1
Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030021-2 UNCLASSIFIED Gap } pate: 2) Feb 95 EMERGING FROM: ORD/ELG P. ROGRAMS 846 AMES BUILDING A To: (uchael Drilliras, ARI Fax NUMBER; {703 ) BIY4-~ SUG SCN gRoay. | | Otkice of Research aud Devrelapmerl SUBJECT: Draft NRC Task Cfelement ~ Reused PLEASE NOTIFY THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON. OF THIS ARRIVAL AT #: 274-864/ Room #: NUMBER, OF PAGES: J (Including Cover Page) REMARKS/COMMENTS SG1A Approved For Release 2008NG4.8.5 €1K-REP96-00791R000100030021-2
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030021 -2
HiTfcLJZSSW'E'D
(DAVE:
oU_ Feb
7R09d: ORE>/EEg
846 AShdES BELILDIRlg
|
SGI
A
70:
Michael
T)r,l/> ^qs
f
Afil
TAX MUMPER ; (w 3) A 7/- S/Q Z-
Q±frce
o/
(Research
Qud
fire/
egg
Z
SUBJECT:
AftfCL
Sg^Teggen t_ gg &e_ urSe &(_
ELEASE ‘HpllEJEM.E ABOVE $&&dEE> EERSO^l 0? THIS ARRIVAL
AT # :
Room
#;
S[U9dBEH 07 RAQES:
c5"
(Including Cover Rage)
rrMarxs/coMMeoTXS
#L
,
SG1A
SGI
I 7R0RC:
(EadERQIR(g
(PrPQRRIMS
(jRPUE
Approved For Release 20S^6^-@^^OT-f©P96-00791R0001 00030021 -2
SG1I Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030035-7 UNCLASSIFIED DATE: 5 Awl TL EMERGING FROM: ORD/EPG P ROGRAMS 846 AMES BUILDING A TO: Pr Michael Drdlirgs FAX NUMBER: (703) 27¢- S162 FROM: Oo jec of Kesearch aid Deve wren O SUBIECT: Fal MOU for ART S/anature NRC Tasting PLEASE NOTIFY THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON OF THIS ARRIVAL T #: 274-8647 Room #: NUMBER OF PAGES: é 7 (Including Cover Page) REMARKS /COMMENTS roved S Agewy Seer Nie tut. THE revived NRC Sd tuith NPC af las Te. each Sf nmeelig. wa eels ret eet Cat yEIS AT 000 L SG1I SG1 Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030035-7 UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030035-7
(
!LfrC‘E%gi*CQ
fPstpgsywcs
(jBOUB
B%QBi: 0‘BP/DBQ
846 AMDS BUILDI<XQ
SGI
A
BO:
SGI
I
BBOLl:
2V MjxAlllL
BSVC <m^BP%: fjof 27?- 5-/62
Office of feieQ/nfi
etuef fece h/Pt ^e < ; f
SUBJDCT:
f~ /na/ MOO
-for fO l
S/Qee Be-e
^
AJ/ZC
BLDS4SD fOTIBB LUCE CLBO'HE fALlDD BEBCOf, OB BttlS XRBJVHL
LIT # :
<274/ ~ 8
LH
Boom
#.*
fUlMBDB^ OB BLKjBS:
^
f
(Including Cover Bage)
BDLlBXBL/COMMLOfC
Mi/cC‘
/e?e /uc/eef
c? f'e
(jj
j
cloc
Ts
,
fAe
AlOji her
feci?
Cigprouef Ly
/fjg'icy
Qe^rior-
/lt<^ iu £
//’('
Leo Leef MLO
S6UJ
SGI
A
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030035-7
UfCLUSSIBlDD
\ Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030038-4 SECRET SGII 2 May 95 SG1I MEMORANDUM: ORD FROM: D/EPG SUBJECT: Star Gate Review Contract As you know, ORD originally planned for the NRC to perform this study. The NRC had confirmed informally that the likelihood was high they would undertake the Star Gate review. All parties previously involved in our discussions at the NRC and US Army believed this to be the case. The NRC has now categorically refused, however. The Chairman of the Commission on Behavioral Sciences, John Swets, states that his 1988 study completed for the US Army is a definitive study which settles the issues relating to paranormal remote viewing (as far as he is concerned). At this point, we need to proceed immediately with an alternative plan. I strongly recommend that ORD send a request for proposal to and contract directly with the American Institutes for Research (AIR). The current president, David A. Goslin, previously served for seven years at NRC as executive chairman of the Commission on Behavioral Sciences, and was directly involved in John Swets 1988 study. AIR believes it can hire every individual already contacted by the NRC to serve on our proposed panel (if we want that). Furthermore, AIR says it can complete this study in half the time and at less cost. AIR is fully cognizant of the issues I presented to the NRC as a result of discussion with me, Dave Goslin, and AIR senior personnel on 2 May. The difference, of course, is that when this study is complete it will say “AIR,” and not “NRC.” However, it should be substantively equivalent. SGFOIA3 AIR is willing to include as a consultant anyone we i recommend (to serve on the panel or in some other ca l . I S3GFOIA3 | | an @ wou @ interested in providing consultation. I SCFOIA3 o not believe chat [| “fhas the right qualifications to form j or chair this panel, however. Included with this memo is a CIP to get this thing rolling, if you approve. The US Army will return the funds we sent to them for NRC as soon as possible, but maybe not in time to meet ORD’s new sole-source action deadline of 15 May. Therefore I have already prepared this package despite the fact money is still SG1I at the Pentagon. SG1I Sct OK. TAMIA Approved For Release 2003/09/16 “ Ch RDP96-00791R000100030038-4
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030038-4
SGI
I
SG1I
3GFOIA3
SGFOIA3
SGI
I
SGI
I
SECRET
2 May 95
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
SUBJECT
(3
ORD
3^D/EPG
Star Gate Review Contract
As you know,
ORD originally planned for the NRC to
perforin this
study.
The NRC had confirmed informally that the
likelihood was high they would undertake the Star Gate review.
All
parties previously involved in our discussions at
the NRC and US
Army believed this
to be
the case.
The NRC has now categorically
refused,
however
.
The Chairman of the Commission on Behavioral
Sciences,
John Swets,
states that his
1988 study completed for the
US Army is a definitive study which settles the issues relating to
paranormal remote viewing
(as
far as he
is concerned)
At this point,
we need to proceed immediately with an
alternative plan.
I strongly recommend that ORD send a request
for
proposal
to and contract directly with the American Institutes
for
Research
(AIR)
.
The current president,
David A.
Goslin,
previously served for seven years at NRC as executive chairman of
the Commission on Behavioral Sciences,
and was directly involved
in John Swets
1988
study. AIR believes
it can hire every
individual already contacted by the NRC
to serve on our proposed
panel
(if we want
that)
.
Furthermore,
AIR says
it can complete
this study in half
the time and at
less cost.
AIR is fully
cognizant of the issues
I presented to the NRC as a result of
discussion with me,
Dave Goslin,
and AIR senior personnel on
May.
The difference,
of course,
is that when this study is
complete
it will say "AIR," and not
"NRC." However,
it should be
substantively equivalent.
SGFOIA3
AIR is willing to include as a consultant anyone we
recommend
(to serve on the panel or in some other capacity)
I
contacted!
do not believe that
or chair this panel ,
however
and ne would he interested in providing mnsnl t-at-i nn
i
has
the right qualifications to form
Included with this memo
is a CIP to get this thing
rolling,
if you approve.
The US Army will return the funds we
sent
to them for NRC as soon as possible,
but maybe not in time
to
meet ORD's new sole-source action deadline of
15 May.
Therefore
I
have already prepared this package despite the
fac t money is
st ill
at
the Pentagon.
|
|
SGI
I
AJLPO^
b
A-
Approved For Release 2003/09/1 f?®-^DP96-00791R0001 00030038-4
Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030077-1 court injunction against Marrs claiming a violation of some agreement they had. In the meantime, a book/media agent (name withheld here) is thought to be romantically involved with Moorhouse and was pushing the ABC piece as an ersatz advertisement for Marrs’ stalled book. It is also rumored that ABC owns Random House, the publisher of Marrs’ book. I am told by the 20/20 people that they could not put a whole piece together about Moorehouse and had seen the Schnable tape. At this moment the show, which was scheduled for airing on 29 September is on hold; they want to interview MG. Thompson who they were able to find in the phone directory. I will be notified in advance of, of if, it S actual air date and time. It seems unlikely at this time that the 20/20 show will have an impact prior to your report to Congress. Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030077-1 Page 3
Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030049-2 6/12/95 Suggestions - Criteria for AIR Star Gate Review _& Evaluation Use the criteria defined below to determine the value and effectiveness of the - government-funded, contractor-performed R&D over the past 20 years in the field of paranormal psychology. * Determine if the funded activities advanced the state-of-the-art in understanding the natural principles underlying paranormal psychology, specifically the phenomena of Remote Viewing (RV) and precognition (PC). If so, how and to what extent? * Using the standards normally applied to scientific disciplines, were the funded R&D activities conducted with the necessary technical rigor and discipline? Have these funded activities -proven? -demonstrated? -enhanced? the existence of RV and/or PC. Justify your answers. * Does the utility of these phenomena extend beyond the laboratory and, if so, under what conditions and/or constraints? * Are there new research topics which are paramount to improve our understanding of these phenomena? Are there definable and realistic approaches to perform the related research? - * This field has been the frequent domain of charlatans. Are the underlying principles now understood adequately such that means to obviate such fraudulent use can be defined? If so, what are these means. + Are there other recent studies, research reports, analyses, etc. by accredited agencies, researchers, etc. that support and/or supplement your conclusions? If so, please specify. sien Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030049-2
SG1I
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030049-2
PLEASE PASS TO
6/12/95
Suggestions
-
Criteria for AIR Star Gate Review & Evaluation
Use the criteria defined below to determine the value and effectiveness of the
government-funded, contractor-performed R&D over the past 20 years in the field of
paranormal psychology.
• Determine
if the funded activities advanced the state-of-the-art in understanding
the
natural principles underlying paranormal psychology, specifically the phenomena of
Remote Viewing (RV) and precognition (PC).
If so, how and to what extent?
• Using the standards normally applied to scientific disciplines, were the funded R&D
activities conducted with the necessary technical rigor and discipline?
Have these
funded activities
-proven? -demonstrated? -enhanced?
the existence of RV and/or
PC.
Justify your answers.
• Does the utility of these phenomena extend beyond the laboratory and,
if so, under
what conditions and/or constraints?
• Are there new research topics which are paramount to improve our understanding of
these phenomena?
Are there definable and realistic approaches to perform the
related research?
• This field has been the frequent domain of charlatans.
Are the underlying principles
now understood adequately such that means to obviate such fraudulent use can be
defined?
If so, what are these means.
• Are there other recent studies, research reports, analyses, etc. by accredited
agencies, researchers, etc. that support and/or supplement your conclusions?
If so,
please specify.
0/2^57
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030049-2
Approved For Release 2004/09/09
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030055-5
Secret
SGI
I
Memo to
:
Record
From:
23 May 95
SGI
I
SGI
I
CIA briefed the status of the Star Gate transfer
to SSCI
22 May 1995.
The SSCI staff present included Charles
Battaglia,
Christopher Straub,
Edward Levine,
Melvin Duby,
CIA
(OCA)
,
participants included
tID/ORD)
(Comptroller)
,
and
(ORD)
.
began with summary of
the Congressional Action
response
to
it,
stressing that ORD was conducting a
and ORD
'
s
blue ribbon panel study and had not transferred people from
DIA because CIA did not pos sess
the means to task them or
disseminate their product.
the^addressed the
three main elements of the CDA:
20 year retrospective,
declassification,
and transfer by
1 July of the program from
DIA to CIA.
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
The briefing quickly became a question and answer
session.
Given that no questions were asked specifically
about
"remote viewing ,
I assume that all present understood
the general nature of
the program activity in this area and
were concerned primarily with the program cost,
utility,
and
transfer issues.
At the end of
the briefing,
summary charts were
distributed to three members,
Christopher Mellon,
Christopher
Straub,
and Al Cummings
(I
think).
These summary charts
indicated when Richard D' Amato had been briefed and included
four highlights of
that meeting.
Some of the questions
included:
Resources and Transfer:
How much will the study cost,
and who
is paying for
it this
year?
_
_
A-
Did Congress have some specific reason for wanting to get
y
n
this program out of DIA? CA '
O' A
What would happen if Congress zeroed out the FY96 money,
*
would CIA still pay for this?
CA~
/
x
How much will CIA spend on R&D versus foreign assessment ? (A
= 3 ,1
> 3
)
How much money has been spent on this program?
How has DIA spent
the money?
Utility:
What
is the real value of this program to the intelligence
community?
Approved For Release 2004/09/0Sec£tfAtRDP96-00791R000 100030055-5
2 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : |a-RDP96-00791 R000100240001 -1 fr - bor rrr Ay p- Pi Cone fee not Ctra a nn wel . Ae oo sais Als flodss Crmmmes ALS JOC A - ~—t% ne S- ae [zt b-et A. herd fy pao Approved 8/10 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100240001-1 4A {s Nana a e+ wy see
Approved For Release 2004/09/09
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030055-5
Secret
SGI
I
Has
the program ever produced a documented success?
Isn't the remote viewing product -numerically evaluated?
What part of the program most belongs
in the intel community?
Was there any case where this program provided critical
information?
After 20 years does anyone have anything to show for this?
The Blue Ribbon Panel
:
Why did the NRC pull out?
Was their letter negative about
remote viewing?
Why repeat the study if NRC pulled out?
How long will AIR take
to complete the study?
Will
the AIR review address
the utility of remote viewing?
t
, stressed that the NRC study dealt with an Army
program dealing with performance enhancement
tools,
and not
Star Gate,
although one chapter in the NRC report addressed
remote viewing.
No one has reviewed Star Gate.]
Declassification:
What does declassification mean?
What aspects of this caused it
to be classified in the
first
place?
What aspects might you keep classified at CIA?
Miscellaneous
:
What program do the Russians have in this area?
Is there any brainwave or other paranormal research going on
anywhere outside the IC?
Would you put the R&D at a University?
Approved For Release 2004/09/09e<£tA4RDP96-00791R000 100030055-5
Approved For Release 200310^^ CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030056-4
c<rW
SSC/
bCafi.
Cf/frn
C/w^ifo
<^-C
V'6 *
i>\ ^ ^
Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030058-2 1 June 1995 Unclassified Star Gate and Related Documents Available for Review by AiR Committee - All Unclassified documents that were at the Star Gate Program Management Office (PMO) authored by SRI (9)! and SAIC (32). - All available SRI documents which have been sanitized by DIA and were downgraded to Unclassified (35)1. An additional 9 documents of this type will be provided if copies of the original classified version can be found in the contractor’s files and, subsequently, sanitized in accordance with the previous DIA review and approval. - Documents obtained from open literature sources (number not available at present) - Unclassified reports from the files of Dr. Ed May, SAIC (currently 12) 1 Annotated bibliography available Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030058-2
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030058-2
1 June 1995
Unclassified
Star Gate and
Related Documents
Available for Review by AIR Committee
- All Unclassified documents that were at the Star Gate Program Management Office
(PMO) authored by SRI (9)
1 and SAIC (32)i
- All available SRI documents which have been sanitized by DIA and were
downgraded to Unclassified (35)i.
An additional 9 documents of this type will be
provided
if copies of the original classified version can be found in the contractor’s
files and, subsequently, sanitized in accordance with the previous DIA review and
approval.
- Documents obtained from open literature sources (number not available at present)
- Unclassified reports from the files of Dr. Ed May, SAIC (currently 12)
1 Annotated bibliography available
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R000 100030058-2
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100040007-7 pp 2 eCIAB D. Management Strategy, Transfer to CIA CIA will develop a comprehensive management strategy after program declassification and review. The Star Gate program currently has 10 DIA billets and $500K in resources allocated to it. Congressional language recommends an even balance in investment between operations, research, and foreign assessment. E. Schedule of Events * Communication of status of CIA program transfer activities to Congress (Mar 1, 1995) e Preliminary declassification actions by CIA, request to DIA for further action (Mar 95) e Establish DCI declassification committee to review long-term issues (Apr 95) ¢ Form Blue Ribbon Panel to conduct retrospective review and technical data analysis (Apr 95) e Conduct technical review, interview intelligence community users, draft preliminary report and recommendations. [Mar-Jun 95] e Develop CIA program management strategy which addresses proper scope, resources, and management. Brief Congress on Blue Ribbon Panel results and recommendations. Report program design and status to Congress, complete actual transfer (Jul 95). heh Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100040007-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030063-6 14 June 1995 Office of Research and Development American Institutes for Research [Contract Initiation Meeting] *“Blue Ribbon Panel Retrospective on Remote Viewing Intelligence Applications” AGENDA Preliminary Items - Ad Hoc Clearances - Public Affairs Office Statement of Work Annotated Biblographies, Unclassified Documents Study Criteria Evaluation of Utility Schedule, Milestones Consulting Tasks Conclusion Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030063-6 for
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030063-6
14 June
1995
Office of Research and Development
American Institutes
for Research
[Contract Initiation Meeting]
"Blue
Ribbon
Panel
Retrospective
on
Remote
Viewing
for
Intelligence
Applications"
AGENDA
Preliminary Items
- Ad Hoc Clearances
- Public Affairs Office
Statement of Work
Annotated Bibiographies ,
Unclassified Documents
Study Criteria
Evaluation of Utility
Schedule,
Milestones
Consulting Tasks
Conclusion
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030063-6
FORM NO.
REPLACES FORM 36-8
(47)
1 FEB 56
241
WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030072-6
SGI
I
SG1I SG1I SG1I JUN @9 '95 83:57 SRI P.1 Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030079-9 FAX 8 June 1995 1820 N. Ft. Myer Drive Arlington, Virginia 22209 Reference: ORD Letter dated 1 June 1995, “Proposed Declassification of SRI's Association with CIA: Remote Viewing Investigations" the purpose of this letter is to confirm our conversation earlier this week on the referenced subject. As we discussed, SRI has no objection to the declassification of the association between the CIA and SRI, or to the declassification of the identity of the investigators involved in the research. If at all possible, we would appreciate an opportunity to review the material which is being declasgified so that we are aware of the full range of materials which will be made public. If this is possible, please let me know. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this declassification. If you need any further information, please let me know. My telephone is 415/859-4328 and my fax is 415/859-6171. incerely, Barbara E. \Camph Group Manager, Engineering Contracts SRI Intemational -@33 Ravenswood Ava. ° Manlo Park, CA 94025 * (415) 496-6200 * TWX: 910-473-2046 * Telex: 334486 Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00791R000100030079-9 SG1A
p.l
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
JUN 09
'95 03:57 SRI
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030079-9
FAX
SG1A
8 June
1995
EPG/OIU
1820 N.
Ft.
Myer Drive
Arlington, Virginia 22209
Reference
:
ORD
Letter
dated
June
199S,
"Proposed
Declassification
of
SRI's
Association
with
CIA: Remote Viewing Investigation*
Dear
j
!
The purpose of-this
S^discussed^SRI
6^* no
this week on the referenced subject.
s, ft «rtrtiation between the
objection to the declassification of
c£
the
identity
of
the
CIA and
SRI/
or
to
the
declassification
of
the
pOBS
yible,
we
investigators
involved
in
'
iew tbe material which
is
would appreciate
an opportunity
*Jare
of
the
full
rang*
of
Mt«ia
dUwhioh
:«LUb. nade public.
If this is Possible, please
let me know.
hgain,
thank,
you
for
the «r?h« in^or^nf pleased
mfknow!
fl
My
ttal%h™e
S
’i^ 415/859-4328 and my fax is 415/859-6171.
SRI International
333 Ravenswooci Ave.
Manlo Park, CA 94025
(415)32*6200
*
TWX: 910-373-2046
•
TaWf. 634466
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00030079-9
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00040007-7
DRAFT
Transfer of Star Gate Program from DIA to CIA
Status and Terms of Reference
I. Status of Program Transfer
The Central Intelligence Agency officially has been tasked by
Congress to transfer the Defense Intelligence Agency's Star Gate
program to CIA by July 1, 1995. Congress also has directed a
retrospective review of Star Gate program activities. CIA has taken a
number of steps in accordance with this direction:
• We have opened dialog with the appropriate point of contact at the
National Research Council and exchanged draft tasking statements to
set up a Blue Ribbon Panel, so that an unbiased, technical
retrospective review can occur.
•
Cooperative meetings between DIA program personnel and CIA
already have resulted in a data exchange for the purposes of
conducting the review and transfer
.
Some officially declassified
documents have been obtained from DIA.
• Informal discussions with the CIA Center for Studies on
Intelligence (CSI) regarding strategies for declassification have
occurred and a memorandum is in preparation from CIA to DIA
specifying the need for further declassification
•
Request has been made through the CIA Office of Military Affairs
focal point channel to enlist the cooperation of the US Army Research
Institute, which currently holds a study contract with the NRC for
program review in the behavioral sciences.
• CIA has contacted the appropriate individuals at the US Army
Research Institute and a resource transfer to Army for the cost of
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00791R0001 00040007-7