a hance ke ko i fl Approved For Release 2000/08/98 : ClA-RDFB6-00789R002200580001-9 Cluster 1 Recreation a ee a a a Cluster 2 15 Transportation Cluster 3 40 Weapons Cluster 4 Technology Cluster 5 Storage Cluster 6 Production/Distribution 0.0 0.2 0.4 . 0.6 0.8 UNCLASSIFIED . Figure 1. | ~s Cluster Diagram fort ~~ ; \, Targets (U) We used the technology cluster (i.e., number 4 in Figure 1) to apply Equation 4 to construct a technology target template. Table 2 shows the targets in this cluster, where the horizontal lines indicate the subclustering within the technology group shown in Figure 1. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 “SIA-RDP96-00789R002200530001-9 0
= . Approved For Release 2000/Q94Q8,: A44iR Ppp 6 -00789R002200530001-9 Table 2 (U) Technology Cluster [56 [ me Toes Transformer Station Modern Windmills Electrical Plant Cogeneration Plant Satellite Dish 3. Satellite Dishes Observatory 08. Solar Observatory Pharmaceutical Laboratory Nuclear Accelerator Linear Accelerator Bevatron UNCLASSIFIED “ (U) Table 3 shows those elements that met or exceeded average membership values of 0.4 using Equation 4. Table 3 (U) Principal Elements Contained in the Technology Template High Technology Electronics Restricted Access Wires/Cables Abstract Activity—Passive Ambiance—Indoor Ambiance—Manmade Ambiance—Outdoor Size—Medium UNCLASSIFIED 11 Approved For Release 2000 dbs ASHER o6-00789R002200530001-9
‘ee eee ee ee ee es 2 ee ‘aallt o | Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDPb6-00789R002200530001-9 (U) As a self-consistency check, we included the technology template in the total target pool and recalculated the clusters. As expected, the technology template was included within the subgroup of targets 3 and 13, and well within the technology cluster as a whole. D. (U) General Conclusions —_ The goal of this effort was to develop an analysis system that would prove effective in providing a priori assessments of premote viewing tasks. If the proper mission-dependent universal set of elements can be identified, then, using a viewer-dependent reliability archive, data from a single remote viewing can be used to prioritize a set of alternative target templates so as to chose the most likely one for the mission. 12 Approved For Release Zo00/nBi08 : anlar Mica aaaameaaaiaaa
is is is oi a i ol eel el Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200530001-9 REFERENCES (VU) Puthoff, H.E., and Targ, R., “A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 64, No. 3, March 1976, UNCLASSIFIED. Targ, R., Puthoff, H.E., and May, E.C., 1977 Proceedings of the International Conference of Cybernetics and Society, pp. 519-529, 1977, UNCLASSIFIED. May, E.C., “A Remote Viewing Evaluation Protocol (u),” Final Report (revised), SRI Project 4028, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, July 1983,‘ May, E.C., Humphrey, B.S., and Mathews, C., “A Figure of Merit Analysis for Free-Response Material,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, pp. 343-354, Tufts University. Medford, Massachusetts, August 1985, UNCLASSIFIED. x Humphrey, B.S., May, E.C., Trask, V.V., and Thomson, M. J., “Remote Viewing Evaluation Techniques (U),” Final Report, SRI Project 1291, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, December 1986,4 Humphrey, B.S., May, E.C., Utts, J.M., Frivold, T.J., Luke, W.L., and Trask, V.V., “Fuzzy Set Applications in Remote Viewing Analysis,” Final Report—Objective A, Task 3, SRI Project 1291, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, December 1987, UNCLASSIFIED. May, E.C., Humphrey, B.S., Frivold, T J., and Utts, J M., “Applications of Fuzzy Sets to Remote Viewing Analysis (U),” Final Report—Objective F, Task 1, SRI Project 1291, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, December 1988, — 13 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200530001-9