Approved For Release 2009 (OR GAFRDP96-00788R001800150001-7 (S) INSTRUCTIONS TO ANALYSTS (U) (U) The information provided as enclosure to this report was obtained in response to a collection requirement provided by . This information was acquired from a new and potentially valuable source of intelligence. Work is currently being pursued to determine the accuracy, reliability, and improvement potential of this source. Your remarks and attention to the evaluation sheet will be the basis for our assessment of this new collection technique. Therefore, the effort you expend will greatly assist us and will ultimately result in you receiving more data of increasing accuracy and reliability. (U) While formulating your judgements concerning the data, the following comments concerning this new source of intelligence may be helpful. (U) Foremost, the data are likely to consist of a mixture of correct and incorrect elements. Specifically: (1) (8S) The descriptive elements are generally of higher reliability than judgements or labels as to what is being described (recreational swimming pool may be mistaken for water purification pools, an aircraft hull may be mistaken for a submarine hull, etc.). Therefore, seemingly appropriate descriptive elements should not be rejected because of mislabeling. (2) (S) The data often contain gaps (in a 3-building complex, for example, perhaps only two of the buildings may be described, and an airfield may be added that isn't there). Such gaps or additions should not be taken to mean that the rest of the data is necessarily inaccurate. (S) Therefore, a recommended approach is to first examine the entire information packet to obtain an overall "flavor'' of the response, reserving final judgement even in the face of certain errors, and then go back through for detailed analysis. (U) If you have questions regarding the data you have received or on its evaluation please feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you. ae, DIA (DT-5A) SG1J cfo L. Lavelle - Bldg. G SRI International Menlo Park, CA 94025 65 Approved For Release 200394 Rik- App96-00788R001800150001-7
99 14aD4S Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001800150001-7 (8S) SUMMARY EVALUATION SHEET (U) (0) For the summary evaluation, please check the following boxes as to the accuracy of the submitted material. * ACCURACY Site Contact, Little with Not Correspondence Mixed Results Good Excellent Unknown Applicable 2 CJ (S) Geographical locale descrip- tion (terrain, water, etc.) CJ U (S) Large-scale manmade elements (cities, buildings, silos, docks, railroad lines, airfields, etc.) (S) Small-scale manmade elements (antennas, computers, tanks, missiles, offices, etc.) (S) General target ambience (re- search, production, adminis- tration, storage, troop move- ments, naval activity, air activity, weapons testing, etc.) 0 U UUs U0 UO U U- 0 UO U Os CC CI C4 Oo UO U | CJ C4 (S) Relevant specific activities (nuclear testing, missile firing, CBW storage, ELINT [] [J CJ ] C4 monitoring, etc.) U (S) Personality information (physical descriptions, actions, responsibilities, [] C_] C J C] plans, etc.) Cannot be de- (S) Overall utility None | Marginal | Useful _] Very Useful J termined at this time [3 * (U) Definitions for the accuracy scale: 0 - Little correspondence... . . Self explanatory, 1 - Site contact with. ..... . Mixture of correct and incorrect elements, but enough of the former to mixed results indicate source has probably accessed the target site, 2 - Good ... 2... 26 2 «+ ss « Good correspondence with several elements matching, but some incorrect information, 3 - Excellent. .... 2... . Good correspondence with unambiguous unique matchable elements and relatively little incorrect information, Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001800150001-7 L3aD4S
Laaddds L9 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001800150001-7 (S) SUMMARY EVALUATION SHEET PERSONNEL (U) (U) For the summary evaluation, please check the following boxes as to the accuracy of the submitted material. * ACCURACY Personnel Little Contact, with Not Correspondence Mixed Results Good Excellent Unknown Applicable 0 (S) Geographical locale description (8) Dress appearance (uniform, formal, casual, etc.) (S) Physical appearance (height, weight, scars, hair color etc.) (S) General health characteristics (S) Nationality (S) Personality characteristics (mental, state, demeanor, etc.) (S) Relevant past responsibilities/ . activities (S) Relevant current responsibilities/activities (S) Relevant planned responsibilities/activities OOOO0UO OOU UO OUUUOU UO - UU OUUU UU: UU OUUOUU ooo (8) Governments, agencies, persons UO UO OUUUU Ou» OM UOOUdodoO ooo responsible to/associated with [J | [ } [] Cannot be de- (S) Overall utility None | Marginal Cc] Useful C_] Very Useful [] termined at this time Cc] * (U) Definitions for the accuracy scale: Q - Little correspondence... . . Self explanatory, 1 + Site contact with. ..... . Mixture of correct and incorrect elements, but enough of the former to mixed results indicate source has probably accessed the target site, 2 - Good «2... 6. 6 « «ese « « Good correspondence with several elements matching, but some incorrect information, 3 - Excellent... * + + + + » Good correspondence with unambiguous unique matchable elements and relatively little incorrect information, Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001800150001-7 Laas
Approved For Release OPNIT EAS SP 4 Ep 8R001800150001-7 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 68 Approved For Release AINGLASSHGIEDsR001800150001-7
Approved For Release 2063 (iR: Eif-RDP96-00788R001800150001-7 (S) REFERENCES (U) Puthoff, H. E. and R. Targ, "A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 64, No. 3 (March 1976). Jahn, R., "The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 70, No. 2 (February 1982). Puthoff, H. E. and R. Targ, "Perceptual Augmentation Techniques (u)," Final Report to CIA, SRI Project 3183, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA (1 December 1975), SECRET. Puthoff, H. E., et al., "Advanced Threat Technique Assessment (U)," Final Report to FTD, SRI Project 5309, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA (October 1978), SECRET/NOFORN. Targ, R., et al., "Special Orientation Techniques (U)," Final Report to Army INSCOM, SRI Project 8465, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA (June 1980), SECRET/NOFORN. May, E. C., "A Remote Viewing Evaluation Protocol (U)," Final Report SRI/GF-0247, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA (December 1982; Revised July 1983), SECRET/NOFORN. 69 Approved For Release 200d6Ka Rois Faopos-00788R001800150001-7