COVER STORY Boom Times on the Psychic Frontier Glendower: I can call sptrits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come vhen you do call for them? —Henry lV For all the enormous achievements of science in posting the universe that man inhabits, odd things keep slipping past the sentries. The tap on the shoul- der may be fleeting, the brush across the cheek gone sooner than it is felt, but the momentary effect is unmistakable: an unwilling suspension of belief in the HENRY GAOSKINSKY tts s ee a DEVICE SET UP TO RECORD OUT-OF-BOD Y TRIP AT AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH and memory? Could there be a para- normal world exempt from known nat- ural law? Both in America and abroad, those questions are being asked by increasing numbers of laymen and scientists hun- gry for answers. The diverse manifes- tations of interest in so-called psychic phenomena are everywhere: » In the US., The Secret Life of Plants becomes a bestseller by offering an astonishing and heretical thesis: greenery can feel the thoughts of humans. » At Maimonides Medical Center in New York City, the image of a paint- A i Questionable procedures costumed in the prim gown of laboratory respectability, rational. An old friend suddenly remem- bered, and as suddenly the telephone rings and the friend is on the line. A vivid dream that becomes the morning reality. The sense of bumping into one’s self around a corner of time, of having done and said just this, in this place, once before in precisely this fashion. A stab of anguish for a distant loved one, and next day, the telegram. Hardly a person lives who can deny some such experience, some such seem- ing visitation from across the psychic frontier. For most of man’s history, those intrusions were mainsprings of action, the very life of Greck epic and biblical saga, of medicval tale and Eastern chronicle. Modern science and psychol- ‘ogy have learned to explain much of what was once inexplicable, but mys- teries remain. The workings of the mind still resist rational analysis; reports of psychic phenomena persist. Are they all ing is transmitted by Esp, and seems to enter the dreams of a laboratory sub- ject sleeping in another room. . > In England, a poll of its readers by the New Scienrist indicates that near- ly 70% of the respondents (mainly sci- entists and technicians) believe in the possibility of extrasensory perception, » At the University of California, Psychologist Charles Tart reports that his subjects showed a marked increase in ESP scores after working with his new teaching machine. » In Los Angeles, a leaf is cut in half, then photographed by a special process. The picture miraculously shows the “aura” or outline of the whole leaf. » In Washington, the Defense De- partment’s Advanced Research Projects Agency assigns a team to investigate seemingly authentic psychic phenome- na at the Stanford Research Institute. spoons and keys apparently with the force of his thoughts. > In the Philippines, Tennis Star Tony Roche is relieved of painful “ten- nis elbow” when an incision is made and three blood clots are apparently re- moved by the touch of a psychic healer, who knows nothing of surgery or of mad- ern sanitation. » In the US., the number of col- leges offering courses in parapsychology increases to more than 100. » In the U.S.S.R., researchers file reports on blindfolded women who can “sec” colors with their hands. » In California, ex-Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who while on the Apollo 14 moon mission conducted telepathy ex- periments with friends on earth, founds the Institute of Noetic Sciences. His new mission: investigate occurrences that will not yield to rational explanation. » In London, Arthur Koestler ex- amines psychic research with the zeal of the believer. Koestler, one of the fore- most explicators of Establishment sci- ence (The Sleepwalkers, The Act of Cre- ation), speaks of “synchronized” events that lie outside the expectations of prob- ability. In anecdotes of foresight and ex- trasensory perception, in the repetition of events and the strange behavior of random samplings, Koestler spots what he calls the roots of coincidence. In his unforgettable metaphor, modern scien- lists are “Peeping Toms at the keyhole of eternity.” That keyhole is stuffed with ancient biases toward the materialistic onse- accident, illusion? Or are Appremed Fonkeleansetdasaats Mi RIA RDPSEN OER GR HOKsD Gas: g field planes and dimensions of experience TIME, MARCH 4, 1974 laymen and scientists alike by bending of psychic research. Once skeptics aban- FA 4
“ER arent a tn CLOCKWISE. FROM LEFT: At Durham's Psychical Re- search Foundation, Robert Morris displays test in which subject outside of room “influences” movement of a cat: sensory-isolation and telepathy experiment al Maimonides Medical Center in New York City: Artist and Psychic Ingo Swann with painting completed afler his “out of body” ad- venture in Ouler space: gerbil in tests for precognitive pow- ers at The Institute for Parapsychology in Durham, N.C. . Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100030002-8 nye
wehaWIOR 4 don those prejudices, says Koestler “ey some extent in the existence of some ‘uitted to finding phenomena. And few will be free ApprovédsF omRalgase 2008/04/48 nChALRDR9G0078 2R00010083 O00 ABcontrols necessary in a new categorics. That exploration is already being conducted by a number of serious para- normalists in a wide range of disciplines. In his Foundation for the Research on the Nature of Man, in Durham, N.C.,, the grand old man of paranormal stud- ies, J.B. Rhine (see box page 70), still keeps watch on test animals for precog- nitive powers. At the nearby Psychical Research Foundation, William Roll and a research staff investigates “survival af- ter bodily death.” In studies with a “‘sen- sitive” and his pet cat, Roll finds ev- idence for a human ability “to leave” VALERY SHUSTOV RUSSIAN FINGER-READING TEST Basically show biz. the body and “visit” the animal. At the University of Virginia Medical School, Psychiatrist lan Stevenson also studies the plausibilities of reincarnation. At the Division of Parapsychology and Psychophysics of the Maimonides Medical Center, Dr. Montague Ullman directs tests in which message senders “think” images into the brains of sleep- ing subjects. “If we had adequate fund- ing,” says Ullman, “we could have a major breakthrough in this decade.” In Connecticut, Businessman Robert Nel- son directs the Central Premonitions Registry, meticulously recording the prophecies of the dreams and visions that people send him. All of these researchers believe to 66 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00787-RO001 GOG39002-B<e. sens. on. 7. moss a KenoaLt ronson the forms are open to wide debate. Says Psychologist Gardner Murphy, profes- sor at the District of Columbia's George Washington University, and a dean of psychic researchers, “It may well turn out that parapsychology will be a mul- tidisciplinary thing, owing much to psy- chiatry, neurology medicine, bio- chemistry, social sciences.” One of parapsychology’s most famous propo- nents, in fact, is an anthropologist: Mar- garet Mcad. It was her passionate ad- vocacy that helped give the Parapsycho- logical Association its greatest claim to legitimacy. After several vain attempts to enter the eminent American Asso- ciation for the Advancement of Science, the P.A..won membership in 1969—af- ter a speech by Mead. Her argument: “The whole history of scientific advance is full of scientists investigating phenom- ena that the Establishment did not be- lieve were there. I submit that we vote in favor of this association's work.” The final vote: 6 to 1 in favor of admission. Immense Claims. As parapsychol- ogy gains new respectability, so do its terms gain wide currency: “psi” for any psychic phenomenon; “clairvoyance” for the awareness of events and objects that lie outside the perimeters of the five senses; “out-of-body” expericnee for seeming to journey to a place that may be miles from the body; “psychokinesis” for the mental ability to influence phys- ical objects; “precognition” for the foreknowledge of events, from the fall of dice to the prediction of political as- sassinations; and the wide-ranging term ESP for extrasensory perception. For all its articulate spokesmen and scientific terminology, however, the new world of psi still has a serious credibil- ity problem. Onc reason is that like any growth industry or pop phenomenon, it has altracted a fair share of hustlers. In- deed, the psychic-phenomena boom may contain more charlatans and con- jurers, more naifs and gullibles than can be found on the stage and in the au- dience of ten Ringling Brothers circus- es. The situation is not helped at all by the “proofs” that fail to satisfy tradition- al canons of scientific investigations, De- spite the published discoveries, despite the indefatigable explorations of the psychic researchers, no one has yet been able to document experiments suffi- ciently to convince the infidel, For many, doubt grows larger with each ex- travagant claim. To Science and Mathematics Ana- lyst Martin Gardner (Relativity for the Million, Ambidextrous Universe), an- nouncements of psychic phenomena be- long not to the march of science but to the pageant of publicity. “Uri Geller, The Secret Life of Plants, telepathy, ESP, the incomplete conclusions of Koestler —all seem part of a new uncritical en- thusiasm for pseudo science,” says Gard- ner. “The claims are immense, the proof nonexistent. The researchers, almost without exception, are emotionally com- ‘eld in which deception, conscious or unconscious, is all too familiar.” Daniel Cohen, former managing ed- itor of Sefence Digest and author of the debunking volume Myths of the Space Age, remains unpersuaded by what he sees through the Koestlerian keyhole. “After decades of research and exper- iments,” Cohen observes, “the parapsy- chologists are not one step closer to ac- ceptable scientific proof of psychic phenomena. Examining the slipshod work of the modern researchers, one be- gins to wonder if any proof exists.” The criticism that psychics find hardest to counter comes not from sci- enlists but from conjurers. Theoretically, magicians have no place in serious sci- ence. But they are entertainers whose business it is to deceive; thus they feel . that they are better qualified to spot chi- canery than scientists, who can be woe- fully naive about the gimmicks and tech- niques that charlatans may use for mystical effects. Jamcs Randi, who ap- pears on television as “the Amazing Randi,” duplicates many of Uri Geller’s achievements with a combination of sleight of hand, misdirected attention and patented paraphernalia, then calls them feats of clay. “Scientists who fall for the paranormal go through the most devious reasoning,” Randi says. “For- tunes are squandered annually in pur- suit of mystical forces that are actually the result of clever deceits. The moncy would be better spent investigating the tooth fairy or Santa Claus. There is more evidence for their reality.” ; Pure Deception. Charles Reyn- olds, editor and member of the Psychic Investigating Committee of the Amer- ican Society of Magicians, agrees. “When evaluating the research, we have found that the researcher’s will to be- lieve is all powerful. It’s a will that has nothing to do with religion; there are Marxists, atheists, agnostics who cling stubbornly to the ancient faith in black magic. Only now it’s called ‘the paranormal.’ ” That faith is nowhere more evident than in the U.S.S.R., which has been beset in recent years with controversial sensitives. One, Ninel Kulagina, was ap- ‘praised as capable of causing objects to float in mid-air. As Martin Gardner notes, “She is a pretty, plump, dark- eyed little charlatan who took the stage name of Ninel because it is Lenin spelled backward. She is no more a sensitive . than Kreskin, and like that amiable American television humbug, she is basically show biz.” Indced, Ninel has been caught cheating more than U.C.L.A. Psychologist Thelma Moss ex- plores the mysteries of Kirlian photog- raphy—pictures belicved by some to show the “aura” of living things. Insert: Kirlian photos of normal elbow (left) and same elbow while experiencing mild electrical shock.
CLOCKWISE EROM LIAPproved. For, Ralgssec2008/04/18 4. GIAcRRRI6-Q078TROQOINQOSONASE fraud the Menninger Foundation prepares a biofeedback test fora = who duplicates psychic feats with a combination of sleight- yogi on bed of nails; Ex-Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who — of-hand, psychology and theatrical gimmicks checks set of . experienced “altered state of consciousness” in outer space, “ESP” cards: Trinidadian “sensitive” performing card clair- at his Institute for Noetic Sciences in Palo Alto, Cal: voyance experiment al The Institute for Parapsychology. iy SiH cay \\ rae s} 18 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100030002-8
| BEHAVIOR 1900 G04) 18 m OLA RDBRYE 10078 ‘once by Soviet Estg BRYB Cf mi x Another Russie addy, PES ORR 4 S.R.L’s tests were indeed conducted ova, can “read” with her fingertips while securely blindfolded. James Randi, an- alyzing photographs of Kuleshova, promptly announced that her act was “a fraud.” To prove his point, he invit- ed testers to blindfold him with pizza dough, a mask and a hood. Then he pro- ceeded to drive a car in traffic. “L won't tell you how [ did it,” he says. “But it was not parapsychologically. It was pure deception, just as hers was.” Such rev- clations have not deterred the parapsy- chologists in the U.S.S.R. or elsewhere. They freely concede that many of their subjects do sometimes cheat, but still may have paranormal powers, In and out of the laboratory, many paranormalist investigators conduct ex- periments that mock rigorous and log- ical procedure. Claims are made, and the burden of proof is shifted to the doubter, Ground rules are laid down by the psychic subject and are all too eagerly accepted by his examiner. If the venture proves unsuccessful, a wide range of excuses are proffered: an un- believer provided hostile vibrations: the subject was not receiving well; negative influences were present; testing rules were too restrictive. It is all reminiscent of the laws in Through the Looking- Glass, where people approach objects by walking away from them. And it cre- ates an atmosphere in which even a gen- uine paranormal subject might have a hard time certifying his abilities. No one has contributed more to the paranormal explosion than Uri Geller, the handsome, 26-year-old Israeli for- mer nightclub magician who seems equally adept at telepathy, psychokine- sis and precognition. “f don't want to spend my whole life in laboratories,” Geller recently told TIME London Cor- respondent Lawrence Malkin. “I’ve just done a whole year at Stanford Research Institute [TIME, March 12]. Now I'll go on to other countries, and let them see if they know what it is I've got.” , Death Threats. At the Stanford Research Institute Geller successfully worked most of his repertoire of mir- acles. In a film made by §.R.L, Geller picks the can containing an object from a group of identical empty cans, influ- ences laboratory scales, reproduces drawings sealed in opaque envelopes, deflects a magnetometer and correctly calls the upper face of a die in a closed box—eight times in eight tries. If Gel- ler’s prowess with dice is indeed para- normal, it raises serious and disturbing CLOCKWISE FROM UPPER LEFT: Psychic Uri Geller, whose reputed abil- ity to bend objects with his mind has stirred sharp debate; ESP test at the American Society for Psychical Re- search; Lie Detector Expert Cleve Back- ster with plant that he believes can “read” his thoughts; in psychokinesis test, subject tries to influence sequence in which bulbs will light. with what University of Oregon Profes- sor Ray Hyman calls “incredible slop- piness,” then other disturbing questions may be raised. Assigned by the Depart- ment of Defense to report on the won- drous happenings at S.R.1., Hyman, ac- companied by George Lawrence, DOD projects manager for the Advanced Re- search Projects Agency, caught Geller in some outright deceptions. Unhappily for Geller, his powers have a tendency to vanish in the pres- ence of sleight-of-hand men. On the To- night Show, where Johnny Carson in- stituted airtight controls at Randi’s suggcstion, nothing that Geller attempt- ed (during an embarrassing 20 minutes) seemed to work. After a group of Eng- lish magicians made plans to catch him BILL EPPRIOGE Searching for a wider kind of self. in the act during a British tour, Geller abruptly canceled out, citing mysterious “death threats,” In the long run, however, Geller’s friends may well be more damaging to his cause than are his detractors. This spring the reputable old firm of Dou- bleday will publish a book entitled Uri by Dr. Andrija Puharich, who brought Geller to the U.S. from Israel. In a crude mishmash of Mission: Inpossible, 2001 and the James Bond series, Puharich (author of a previous volume on the psy- chedelic effects of mushrooms) soberly describes his adventures with Geller. From outer space, highly intelligent computers called SPECTRA communi- cate through taped messages, which dis- appear. “We can only talk to you through Uri’s power,” says the mystical voice. “It is a shame that for such a bril- liant mind we cannot contact you di- Q300G2eBy meets the in- vestigators from S.R.I., he confesses that outer-space intelligence directs his work. But the S.R.I. scientists are not taken aback. One, Russell Targ, plac- idly remarks, “The things you are tell- ing us agree very well with things that Hal [S.R.I. Colleague Harold Puthofl] and I believe but we can't prove.” Adds Astronaut Ed Mitchell: “Uri, you're not saying anything to us we don’t in some way already sense or understand.” The text raises some troubling questions. Is Puharich indeed in touch with what he calls “my editor in the sky’? Is his ac- count of the S.R.I, meeting as true as his reasonably accurate report of Uri’s mecting a year ago with the editors of TIME? If it is, why have the S.R.1, sci- entists failed to mention Uri Geller’s contacts with outer space? Are they properly fearful of that most irrefutable antidote to non- sense: laughter? Or were they, as they now claim, merely “humoring” their subject? Almost as impressive as Geller’s rise to fame is the phenomenal success of The Secret Life of Plants (Har- per & Row; $8.95), a vol- ume that is unaccountably placed on the nonfiction shelves of bookstores. The work of two occult journal- ists, Secret Life is an anthol- ogy of the absurd, costumed in the prim gown of labo- ratory respectability. In it are researchers like Cleve Backster, a lie-detector ex- pert who attached the ter- minals of his machines to plants. Behold! The vegeta- tion reacted to his thoughts. Most scientists have greeted the experiments with open skeplicism—with good rea- son. After his plants would not respond for a visiting Canadian plant physiolo- gist, for example, Backster offered an interesting hy- pothesis: the plants “fainted” because they sensed that she routinely inciner- ated her own plants and then weighed the ashes after her experiments. Backster is the essence of conserva- lism compared with the book’s more ad- venturous researchers. A New Jersey electronics buff, Pierre Paul Sauvin, at- tached a Rube Goldbergian machine to his plants, and then spent the weekend with his girl friend at a place 80 miles away. He found that even at that dis- tance the plants had responded to his sexual relations with the girl. The tone oscillators went “right off the top,” he says, at the moment of orgasm. In Japan, Ken Hashimoto, another polygraph expert, discovered that his cactus could count and add up to 20. George De La Warr, a British engineer, insisted that young plants grew better if their “mother” were kept alive. Ironi-
BEHAVIOR cally, the ayy, ABpROVe selves to sor rover rt facts about botany. Plants do respond physiological- ly to certain sound waves. Talking lo a plant may indeed make it healthier, bo- cause it thrives on the carbon dioxide ex- haled by the speaker. Many psychics and their followers believe that paranormal powers may be dependent on mysterious auras or “en- ergy flows,” phenomena that they say can be recorded by Kirllan photogra- phy. The technique, developed in the late 1930s by Russian Electronics Ex- pert Semyon Kirlian and his wife Va- lentina, involves introducing a small amount of high-voltage, high-frequency current into the subject and recording the subsequent discharge on photo- graphic film. The result is a photograph showing an “energy body"—-a weird aura—around the plant, animal or hu- man part being photographed, Soon, Kirlians claimed that photo- graphing a portion of a leaf, for exam- pic, would produce the aura of the en- tire leaf on film. Some psychics claim that in time the aura of a missing limb might be discernible with Kirlian pho- tography. Today the process is an in- legral part of paranormal exploration. In the US. the leading proponent of the For Ritledse 2003/64/4 8.4. CIA-RDP96s0 0787: Moss, who has taken more Kirlian pho- tographs and done more experimental work with them than anyone outside Russia. Moss, a former Broadway actress, found her interest in parapsychological phenomena kindled afier Lsp therapy. “From the first,” she recalls, “J intend- ed lo specialize in parapsychology be- cause of the glimpses of psychic phe- nomena I experienced during the Lsp treatments. But | certainly don't feel the need to use drugs any more... When you've gotten the message, you hang up the phone.” For Moss, the message is that Kirlian photography clearly dem- onstrates a human aura. “We have done work with acupuncturists and [psychic] healers,” she says, “and we find that the corona of the healer becomes intense be- fore healing, and then afterward is more relaxed and less strong. We think we're looking at a transfer of energy from the healer to the injured person.” Others are less certain. Writing in the Photographic Society of America journal, Bill Zalud concluded, “All spec- ulation hinges on obtaining photographs of normal tissue patterns for compar- ative purposes and, so far, no one has really determined what a normal Kir- B is.” Stanford Professor Villiam Tiller, an enthusiast of the paranormal, is more assured about the technical cause of Kirlian phenomena on film. “What we're looking at,” he maintains, “is cold electron discharge.” Sickly Tissue. Says L. Jerome Stan- ton, author of a forthcoming book on auras and Kirlian photography: “Per- haps some day the technique will be a valuable diagnostic tool. Maybe sick people do have different ‘auras.’ But as of now, there is no assurance that it is at all useful.” Though not accusing Kirlian researchers of faking effects, Stanton notes that the famous “phantom leaf” is casy to duplicate by double-cx posing the film, first with the whole leaf, again af- tera portion has been removed, and that different voltages and conditions can change the picture in incalculable ways. “Working with advanced equipment,” he says, “I could produce Kirltan effects that would astound the unsophisticated, and that includes a lot of scientists and physicists. Remember, electronics and photography are two very complicated 70 The first professional organization to study paranormal phenomena was the British Society for Psychical Research, founded in 1882. Among its membership were prominent scholars and scientists —men of unimpeachable credentials and high moral character. They soon discovered and enthusiastically reported on the telepathic abilitics of five little girls, daughters of the Rev. A.M. Creery, The mentalist millennium was at hand. Six years later, the girls were caught cheating and shamefacedly admitted that they had fooled the investigators. They were the first in a long series of de- ceivers of scientists. The society's next major project was an investigation of two “sensilives” from Brighton, G.A. Smith and Douglas Blackburn. Smith would allow himself to be blindfolded, his ears to be plugged, his body to be thoroughly blanketed; yet somehow the thoughts of Blackburn reached him. This time, it seemed, the S.P.R. had really justified its existence. When Smith left the $.P.R. in 1892, no other comparable sensitive could be found. Still, the members had seen the telepathy performed with their own eyes; the evidence was held acceptable. Tt was not until 1908 that Blackburn ad- mitted deceit. “The whole of these al- leged experiments were bogus,” he later wrote. The remainder of his statement has echoed to this day: “LOur hoax] orig- inated in the honest desire of two youths to show how easily men of scientific Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100030002-8 COMING OF THE FAIRIES mind and training could be deceived when seeking for evidence in support of a theory they were wishful to establish.” The American Society for Psychical Research, organized with the help of Philosopher William James in 1885, suf- fered similar cmbarrassments. Yet it pursued its quarry with vigor. As James had noted, “To upset the conclusion that all crows are black, there is no need to seck demonstration that no crow is black, it is sufficient to produce one white crow.” But after 25 years of read- ing psychic literature and witnessing phenomena, James admitted that he was “theoretically no further than I was at the beginning, and I confess that at times [ have been tempted to believe that the EXPERIMENTER J.B. RHINE & VOLUNTEERS Creator has eternally intended this de- parture of nature to remain baffling.” Other researchers had not been humble or uncertain. Late in the cen- tury, a self-styled sensitive named Henry Slade toured the U.S. and Europe mak- ing objects vanish and swinging com- pass needles without the aid of a mag- net. He was so convincing that a German scientist published a_ book, Transcendental Physics. devoted to Slade’s accomplishments. Again, the psychic millennium scemed imminent, But in his biography, A Magician Among the Spirits, Uarry Houdini reported that the conjurer was simply a fraud with a dazzling technique; Slade later con- fessed that it was indeed all an act. TIME, MARCH 4, 1974
fields. Mix them and a BRIA@YESLE? r ReAs¢ AQRSLO al Bin @lAcRRE 26-0078 eR 9001 1000982 Fi cence as- will remain in the dark.” The most irresponsible and odious niche in the world of the paranormal is occupied by the psychic healers, who cannot operate legally in the U.S. but lure unfortunate Americans overseas with claims of spectacular cures. Diag- nosing illnesses and locating diseased or- gans by purely psychic means, they per- form operations by plunging their hands through what appear to be deep inci- sions to grasp and remove sickly tissue. In the Philippines, currently the center for psychic surgery, a number of con- jurers use sleight of hand and buckets of blood and animal parts to work their wonders. Surrounded by adherents who have been “cured,” the ill-educated and often filthy surgeons perform “opera- tions” —slashes of the epidermis, knives in the eye cavity, fingers in the abdomen —sometimes painlessly and always with great flourish, As one witness to such “surgery” de- scribes it: “The healer pulled some tis- sue from the area of the ‘operation’ ... eter chanieaeibenataanend ELIOT ELISOFOR from Tony's hand ... 1 wanted to have valid medical tests performed on it. The tests, conducted in Seattle, showed that the tissue was ‘consistent with origin from a small animal ... there is no ev- idence in any of this tissue to suggest that this represents metastatic carcino- ma from the breast of the patient.’ ” Tom Valentine, author of a book on per- haps the best known of the psychic sur- geons, Tony Agpaoa, documents the ex- perience of a Mrs. Raymond Steinberg of Two Rivers, Wis. Tony “made a ma- jor production” of removing a piece of metal and several screws that had been surgically placed in her hip after an au- tomobile accident. X rays later showed that Agpaoa had removed nothing. True Believer. But the psychics, and those who profit from them, remain undaunted. In a few months, the respect- able publishing firm of Thomas Y. Crowell will publish the story of yet an- other psychic healer, the late great Bra- zilian Arigo, Surgeon of the Rusty Knife. The author: John Fuller, whose pro-fly- ing-saucer books /ncident at Exeter and The Interrupted Journey were big sellers during the UFO craze of the 1960s. The aflerword is written by Geller Biogra- pher Puharich, who in Uri incidentally suring him that Arigo was not hurt in his fatal car accident in 1971: “There was no pain. He left his body before the crash.” No amount of demonstrable fraudu- lence, no exposure of the fake, the ma- nipulator, the unscrupulous, ever seems capable of dissuading the truc believer in paranormality. James Fadiman, of the Stanford School of Engineering, be- lieves that “most (but not all) para- psychologist demoristrators are also frauds,” then gives the classic rationale: “Look at it this way. You think you have powers of clairvoyance, and finally you become a celebrity because of it. You’re on the stage or in an experimental sit- uation and sometimes your powers fail you. They do very often for most of these guys. So what do they do? They cheat.” Robert Benchley once separated people into two categories: those who separate people into two categories and those who do not. Parapsychologist Ger- trude Schmeidler of New York’s City College is in the first category. Her stud- ies show that on the issue of para- psychology her subjects divide into be- lieving sheep and doubting goats. The sheep almost invariably score higher in tests of paranormal powers. Will the sheep ever convince the ruminating IN EARLY ESP TEST (1940) Perhaps parapsychology's most gul- lible proponent was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of the superrationalist detective Sherlock Holmes. Doyle re- mains the greatest proof that intelli- gence and scruple cannot compete with naiveté and the desire to accept the par- anormal as demonstrable fact. After the death of his son in the Great War, he turned to spiritualism for solace. This led, in time, to investigations of spirits, and eventually to little winged creatures in the bottoms of gardens. In his 1922 volume The Coming of the Fairies, Doyle reproduced photographs of a tiny gob- lin and elves caught by a child's cam- cra. The pictures were manifestly staged; the entire project made all but the blind- cael YUME, MARCH 4, 1974 TED SERIOS PROJECTING PICTURES est believers wince. One who did not was a young American botanist named J.B. Rhine. After an inspiring Doyle lecture on spiritualism, Rhine and his wife Louisa immersed themselves in lit- erature published by the Society for Psychical Research. When Rhine later joined the faculty of Duke University, he began a lifelong devotion to psychic research. It was he who coined the terms extrasensory perception and psi (for psychic phenomena); it was he who gave his specialty an academic imprimatur by compiling mountains of statistics about psychic subjects who could “read” cards that they could not sec. From the start, Rhine was criticized BAN ODVWIds GTyda9 for juggling numbers. (Subsequent re- searchers have also used questionable procedures, citing “negative ESP” when the number of correct guesses fall be- low average and “displacement” when subjects call the card before or after the one they are trying to guess.) H.L. Menc- ken summarized the early views of the dubious when he wrote, “In plain lan- guage, Professor Rhine segregates all those persons who, in guessing the cards, enjoy noteworthy runs of luck, and then adduces those noteworthy runs of luck as proof that they must possess myste- rious powers.” Rhine tightened his lab- oratory conditions in the 1930s, and much of the criticism withered—but so did his ESP stars. In the 1960s a psychic superstar came along in the person of Ted Scerios, a hard-drinking, onetime bellhop from Chicago. Serios’ gift was definitely off- beat: he produced pictures inside a Po- laroid camera using nothing but his mind and a little hollow tube he called his “gismo.” Reporters Charles Reyn- olds and David Eisendrath, who ob- served Scrios at work in Denver, had little trouble constructing a device that could be secreted inside a gismo to pro- duce ali of Serios’ effects. The instru- ment contained a minuscule lens at one end and a photographic transparency at the other. When the device was pointed at the camera lens and the shutter was clicked, an image was recorded on film. The Reynolds-Eisendrath story was printed in Popular Photography and many ofSerios’ followers were shattered. Again the millennium was deferred. Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100030002-8
BEHAVIOR " goats? Will the goats ever_underr. the faith of Appravedcbosl events have occurred. Just a few years ago what smug Western rationalist would have accred- ited acupuncture? Yet the ethnocentric prejudice seemed to disappear almost at a stroke when the Western world learned of James Reston’s appendix op- eration. The New York Times columnist submitted to acupuncture after surgery on a trip to China in 1971; thereafter, the unorthodox method was examined throughout the U.S. Today acupuncture is under intense study at several med- ical centers. Although same of the ben- eficial effects of “paranormal” medicine have been acknowledged by Western scientists, they are still at a loss to explain it. It was not long ago that most Americans attributed the feats of Eastern yogis to clever fakery. Yet the new Western experimentation with biofeedback* has shown skeptics that the mind can indeed control what are normally invol- untary bodily functions. The Menninger Founda- tion in Topeka, Kans., reports incontrovertible proof that subjects trained by biofeedback can con- trol their blood circulation and lower the temperature of the parts of their bod- ies at will; migraine head- aches can be _ literally wished away. The ancient yogic mythic skills sud- denly sccm within the grasp of everyone, Is it not possible that thoughts—like TV pro- grams—can be transmit- ied from one brain to an- other? And if enough energy can be generated by the brain, why should it not influence the roll of dice? Or make a plant respond? In an epoch when the-new physics posits black holes in the universe and particles that travel faster than the speed of light, and has already confirmed the existence of such bizarre things as ncu- trinos that have no mass or charge, an- timatier and quasars, why should any phenomenon be assumed impossible? What is wrong with Physicist Sir James Jeans’ attempt to give coherence to an unruly cosmos: “The universe begins to look more and more like a great thought than a great machine"? The psychie adherent's reply is sim- ple: anything is possible. But simply say- ing that it is so and then supporting the contention with shoddy or downright fraudulent evidence, is nol enough. Psy- chic phenomena cannot be accepted on NATIONAL TA *A process by which one can Jearn to control in- voluntary bodily functions (such as heartbeat) through the visual or aural monitoring of physi- ological data. 72 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000100030002-8 TTLER live researchers. To date, those demon- strations have not been made. Any close examiner of psychic in vestigators and reporters will find a new meaning for Koestler’s roots of coinci- dence. A loose confederacy of parapsy- chologists parodics the notion of the sci- entific method. Harold Puthoff, one of the two S8.R.I. investigators of Uri Gel- ler, is singled out in The Secret Life of Plants as a reputable scientist who has been experimenting with the response, ofone chicken egg to the breaking of an- other. He is also a promoter of the bi- zarre and controversial cult of Scientol- ogy, which Ingo Swann, another psychic vtton Pee ERE NYaE ec a PSYCHIC SURGEON OPERATING IN PHILIPPINES Sometimes painlessly, always with flourish, tested by S.R.I, also practices. William Targ, a Putnam executive, recently con- tracted to publish Astronaut Ed Mitch- ell’s forthcoming book, Psychic Explo- ration, A Challenge for Science. At the signing, Targ stated that “the real race now between the Russians and us is in the area of sciences like ESP.” Mitch- cell's Institute of Noetic Sciences helped to fund S.R.I.’s Geller research, which was conducted largely by Puthoff and Russell Targ, who happens to be Editor Targ’s son. The questionable connections of many psychic researchers, in addition lo the paucity of objectively verifiable re- sults in their work, has made it difficult to raise funds for research; parapsychol- ogists barely squeak by with moncy from a few foundations and gifts and encour- agement from occasional philanthro- pists like Stewart Mott and Manhattan Realtor John Tishman. There is only one academic chair on parapsychology ase Atbaniay STE RERPS POET ROCIO F fis poe cee ng ingly negative, it is unlikely that acad- emics or foundations would encourage more chairs, or promote further psychic investigations. In a way, it is rather a pity that the shecp cannot get together with the goats. At the very least, the paranormal es- tablishment has questioned the dogma, emphasized the ignorance and under- lined the arrogance of modern medicine and science. Indeed, modern doctors have scarcely breached the frontiers of the mind. Science has all too frequently destroyed the layman's sense of wonder by seeking materialistic explanations for all phenomena. As C.P. Snow says: “Scientists re- gard it as a major intellectual virtue to know what not to think about.” Com- plains one S.R.I. spokesman: “The so- cicly we live in doesn’t give you per- mission to have psychic abilities. That is one reason that so much talent is sup- pressed.” As Martin Gardner believes, “Modern science should indeed arouse in all of us a humility before the im- mensity of the unexplored and a toler- ance for crazy hypotheses.” As for the parapsychologists who make many of those hypotheses, they could learn the most valuable weapon in the arsenal of the truth seeker: doubt, One hundred and fifty ycars ago Charles Lamb observed that credulity was the child's strength but the adult's weakness. That observation is even more valid to- day, when shoddy or ignorant research is used to lend legitimacy to the most ’ extravagant tenets of the psychic movement. That is not to say that parapsychol- ogy ought to be excluded from serious scrutiny. Some first-rate minds have been attracted to it: Freud, Einstein, Jung, Edison. The paranormal may ex- ist, against logic, against reason, against present evidence and beyond the stan- dard criteria of empirical proof. Perhaps there are reasons why the roll of the dice and turn of the cards sometimes appear lo obey the bettor’s will. Perhaps the laws of probability are often suspended. Perhaps Geller and other magicians can indeed force metal to bend merely be- cause they will it. Perhaps photographs can be projected by the mind. Perhaps plants think. Perhaps not. There is only one way to tell: by a thorough examination of the phenom- ena by those who do not express an a priori belief. By those for whom proba- bility is not a mystique but a conipre- hensible code. By those who have noth- ing to lose but their skepticism. Until such examiners are allowed to play the psychic game, it is unlikely that the paranormal will escape the ambiguous ulltcrance against itin Leviticus: “Do not turn to mediums or wizards; do not seck them out, to be defiled by them...” And that most wondrous and mysterious of entities, the human mind, will remain an underdeveloped country. TIME, MARCH 4, 1974