C: rr n ct*
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R00Q300740001-8
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION
CD57
ILLEGIB
iomni?BnrI
h
i?fJ
eP°rt doc“m®nts
a remote viewing session conducted in
compliance with a request for information on
a target of interest^^^^H
The purpose of this session was to*
describe
an aLu
at
a speciSHP
designated by geographic coordinates.
specmea time
¥
-si?^ ; cofr^lete°trBnacript
sssiiJ‘ofihe
B s^2: nivs r
mot
?^
the remote viewer,
^ar9e ** culn9 information provided
is the responsibility of the requestor?
0 80
US6 °f
th<?
xnforrnation provided
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
:
0300740001-8
SESSION CO
S' 7
RVer
:
mmu
*
ANALYST
/
.IVer
DATE/T IME P S3 P
/ %
TAPE
TARGET
%C?Q^
PSI C0NDUSIVE STATES;
1.
Physical Relaxation:
a
*
period?
1 3616 t0 physica11 relax before and/°r ^ring "cool down"
b. Did Rver appear physically relaxed before and/or during the session?.
c.
When questioned,
did Rver report
a sense
of physical relaxation in
"
On lunction
tin f h
f ho onoei rtn *5
conjunction with the session?
2. Degree of Arousal:
’ flrhL
q^
eSti
?
n
f
d a
p
fc
n
r the session
diLd the RVer report he was able to
the session?
316 °f
paSS1Ve concentration" prior
to and/or during
3.
b
*
nnri/nr
e
H.,ISr
'gfk
t0 be
*n
o state of
"Pa8sive concentration" prior to
and/or during the session?
Sensory
Input:
a
' teinTth/sessJon?.
00"1
"n°iSa ''
inClUde “U senseB) before and/or
b. Was RVer disturbed by noise before and/or during the session?
C
*
at
S
h^?
8ble t0 dl8regard the
"noise” and concentrate on the task
4.
Increased Awareness of Internal Processes:
a. Did RVer report internally perceived sensory data?
b. Did Rver express his confidence in the internal sensory data he
perceived
c. Did RVer have REM during session?
5.
Hemispheric Specialization:
_
f\ i
*
H
’
I
^
v^i W|
I
ID
a. Did Rver exhibit a voice quality change?
b. Did RVer's verbage exhibit right hemispheric behavior?
(Lack of
sentence structure,
gestalts,
etc.)
6.
Altered View of World:
a.
Did Rver believe the task at hand was possible for him?_
b.
Was Rver confident
that he could do what was asked of him?.
7.
Importance of Task:
a.
Was Rver briefed on importance of mission?
b.
Did Rver display positive motivation concerning the task at hand?
YES
*
il
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
a a “Ee TART SESSION - “  |¢ PEGE ON aug atria Sn ke Oa rece cee eee ‘ a: vai Release 2000/08/07 : ‘CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8 (7 oad VEO ‘SECRET. PAGE __ SECRET wuen rite in Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
00300740001-8
SG1A
SG1A
SG1A
SG1A
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS/ORCON
IAFM-OPS-HU-SA
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
20 June 1980
1.
(S)
The source
wa:
tinent to
actual target coordinates
order:
ts provided only with the
The folio-wing information is provided in date
a.
(S) Information predicted for 22 June 1980:
Source reported many
vehicles,
trucks, trailers approximately
2g- ton or larger in size would
he located at the target
area.
He stated that mary of the vehicles would
be carrying tube type objects.
No other information was reported for this
CL8XG •
b.
(S) Information predicted for
23 June 1980:
Source reported that
there. would .probably be an effort to hide things at the target site by
covering objects with either foilage that was not previously there or
foilage type coverings.
No other information was provided for this date.
c.
(s) Information predicted for 24 June 1980:
Source reported that
efforts to move or cover existing objects
at the target
site would be nearly
completed at that time.
He reported that much string and canvas would be
seen then as well as the entire area being boardered by dark green foilage.
When questioned if there were any trucks or vehicles expected to be at the
target site on that date, he responded that he did not expect there to be
any.
He did state that there were very well camoflaged gun emplacements
at each end of the cleared area,
the type of gun he could not identify,
but did state that they appeared to be
so small as to look like toys.
2.
(S) Request the above information? <be evaluated and comments be provided
to the undersigned in writing no later than 26 June 1980,
this will permit
a full evaluation; of the source of information for both accuracy and intell-
igence value.
Information is consistent with previous information provided
by a different source,
reference report CD56, dated 19 June 1980.
CLASSIFIED BY:
REVIEW ON:
MSG HQDA (DAMI-ISH)
Dtd;
051630Z JUL 78
20 June 2000
SECRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Apfroved For Release 2000/08/07 : ee ae ( J 206 pus — 27 fun fo | Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8 (/)
/306
— Z2
M
&
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/075:€?E^RE®F°000300740001-8
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS/ORCON
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
SG1A
SG1A
Th^acilitator was provided with the target coordinates;
th© specific date and time of interest;
1200 hours^/^ne7
22 June,
and 21 June 1980.
The facilitator was also instructed that the
•v’onn
1'
S?°Uld be
^old tha
't the target occupies an area approximately 500
X 300 meters m size.
The remote viewer was then requested to describe the
target in as much. detail as possible.
NOTE:
the facilitator was also aware
prior to the session that the target of interest consisted of vehicles with-
er
1® area of. interest,
but no
fuiHiher information was provided to the fac-
During
, n0 ?eriod of the session did the facilitator mention vehicles
prior to the remote viewer describing them as located at the target.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000300740001-8