Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
Table 5
Serial mirier
Target object
Results
Record made
Date completed
Sample V no. 12
aim diameter single
strand enamel wire coil
Pulled out
three sections
Videotaped
2 Apr 84
Sample 5 no. 13
2 m diameter single
strand enamel wire coil
Pulled out
five sections
Videotape
and photograph
10 May 84
Sample six A
1.5 mm single strand
shielded wire
Pulled out
two sections
Videotaped
25 Apr 84
Sample six B
1.5
nrn single strand
shielded wire with
washer affixed to end
Pulled out four
Videotaped
28 Apr 84
sections and one
and photographed
washer. The wire
inside broke into
three sections
Illustration 12:
Video taped results of the sample six experiment
spacing between pictures is four frames
2:
Frame one.
Right thumb and
Frame two:
wire moves down in bottle
forefinger pinching wire
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
4:
Frame three:
wire continues to
5:
Frame four: wire continues to drop
drop in bottle
6:
Frame five:
wire continues to drop
7:
Frame six:
wire is coiled up
toward the left in the bottle
DISCUSSION.
1.
The question of the validity of paranormal ability to break through
spatial barriers.
We can see from the results described above that as one of the paranormal
abilities, the ability to break through spatial barriers actually exists.
The
sample bottles type one and type four were glass which had been heated to form
the mouth almost shut.
If these bottles were broken,
they could not be put
back together, any breakage would be irreversible.
Furthermore,
each sample
had a unique serial number and the target objects were of different colors,
and
there were different numbers of each different color.
The target objects also
had russian letters and codes as well as dots.
Each sample had thorough video
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
taping equipment from all
angles,
ensuring
their individual characteristics
formed during heating.
The information
totalled
together
forms one
of
a
kind
samples.
It would
be
impossible
to copy
these samples.
In addition,
prior
to
the experiment,
the subject had no contact with
the
test samples
and had
no
ideal
of
the
form or coding
of
the
target
objects.
The
test subject only came
in contact with
the samples
at
the experiment
site.
Therefore,
first,
copy
of
samples was
impossible,
so switching
of
containers became meaningless.
Second,
the glass bottles could not be broken.
Third,
the samples
could not leave
the
testing site,
and there was always someone watching
the testing
site,
and
at
fe^Selr^^^^nlilions^tle nutter,
col or
)
serial
P number
and coding
of
tablets
or plexiglass pieces
on
the experiment
table exactly matched
those
in
the
sample bottles.
This
allows
us
to only
reach one conclusion:
that
the tablets
and
pieces
of plexiglass were passed
through
the walls
of
the container.
Also,
in
the experiment with
the sample
six bottles,
there was
only
a one
mm small
hole
in one
end
of
the glass bottle
and
the shielded wire
in
the
bottle was one mm
in diameter.
This
type
of
one mm shielded wire has many
frays
at
the
end
(shielded wire
is formed
from braiding fine metal
wires).
Even
if
we used our hand
to directly pinch
this end
of
the wire
so
it would go
through
a hole
the same
size,
it would
be
a difficult
task.
However,
this wire
was placed inside
a glass
tube,
and
there was
a
7 mm iron washer
there
as well.
Without breaking
the glass bottle,
three
to five sections were
removed
and
the
washer appeared on
the outside.
The shielded wire on the inside was broken and
there were several
sections
of sections
of wire three
to ten mm long and
the
washer was
gone.
Without
a doubt this proves
that
the shielded wire
and
the
washer passed
through the wall
of
the container to
the outside
of
the
container.
However,
the glass was not broken.
Therefore,
it
cold only have
been
a
type of paranormal
ability
that caused
to be outside
the glass.
We
should explain that
this
type
of
experiment had
a high degree of
one
of
a
kind.
Because
of
the thickness
and
length
of
the samples,
the method of
securing
the
wire
inside,
and the closing
of both ends
al had their own special
characteristics that would
be difficult
to duplicate.
Furthermore,
the samples
were very
long
and
it would be difficult
to switch them undetected.
In
addition,
there were videotaping procedures,
ensuring the strictness
of
the
experiments.
2.
CONCERNING THE POINT OF BREAKING THROUGH
In these experiments,
we can see fairly clearly the phenomenon
of
the
target objects passing through the walls of
the container.
This phenomenon
tells
us:
A.
The breaking through point cannot be
a hole
in the container,
a slit
in
the container or
the edges of
the seal but
is directly through
the wall
of
the container.
In the experiments with clear glass containers
and relatively
small
target objects,
we can
also see them become larger during
the process
of
the target objects passing through.
Also,
in
the experiments where
the
container and
the transparent target object were
all
relatively
large,
we could
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1
see
the
target objects being both inside and outside
the container,
the changes
and
the cutting
through phenomena.
B.
The targets passed through
the walls
of
the containers
at different
speeds.
In
the experiment with
the CIWUJIA bottles,
it
took around
2.5
milliseconds
for two-thirds
of
a tablet one centimeter
in diameter
to pass
through
the wall
of
the container.
The average speed was V = 7mm/2.5 ms
- 2.8
meters per second.
Assuming
that
they passed through
at
a uniform
speed,
the
speed would
be
at
this
level.
Somewhat slower than
the speed
at which
an
athlete
runs.
The
removal
of
the unexposed photographic paper packet
from the
500
ml
dropper bottle
took more
than
10 milliseconds,
or
a
speed
of
30 cm/second.
For pulling shielded wire or enamel wire
from
a glass
tube,
the
speed
could be even slower,
or stop
for several
seconds.
Therefore,
we can
see
from these experiments
that
the speed
at which solid
target objects pass
through
spatial
barriers
can be very slow,
speeds
slow
enough
to be followed
by the human
eye.
However there were also changes.
We
reason
that often we are not able
to see
the processes because
the walls
are
to
thin.
These
are granular shaped target objects passing through thin walls
in
a
number
of milliseconds.
High
speed cameras or slow motion video cameras
can
show the visible
time progression.
This more clearly proves
the objective
reality
of
the paranormal
ability
of breaking through
spatial
barriers.
C.
In
the process
of
the experiments
the walls
of
the containers have
to
have
a
slit,
small hole or stopper for
the experiment
to succeed.
The objects
cannot
be removed from
a completely closed container.
However,
in
these
experiments we discovered
that the point
at which
the objects pass through
the
spatial barrier
is not
at
the slit,
the .hole or between
the wall
and
the
stopper,
but
is
in
the wall
of
the container.
What
then,
is
the significance
of
the
slit,
hole or border between
the stopper and the wall
of
the container?
Is
it
a psychological
requirement
or
a physical
requirement?
This
is
something
that requires further
study.
CONCLUSIONS
From the analysis
of
the video tapes and high speed photographs
of
successful
experiments
in breaking through spatial
barriers
by
a
young
subject
with paranormal
abilities,
we have proved
the existence
of
one
type
of
paranormal
ability
-
the ability
to pass through
spatial
barriers,
that
the pas
through point can be
the wall
of
the container,
and furthermore,
that
the
passing through
the walls occurs over
a period
of
time.
Approved For Release 2000/08/09
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200040001-1