Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
DO NOT
ALLOW TODAY'S ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY TO POLLUTE HUMAN
PARANORMAL ABILITY RESEARCH
BUYAO RANG JINTIANDE DIANCELILUN WURAN RENT I
TEY I GONGNENGDE YANJIU
BY:
Liang Ronglin
of Jinan University Physics Department
ABSTRACT:
This article
reminds those conducting research into Qigong
and human
paranormal
abilities:
Do not allow the polluting nature of
the theory of
electromagnetism which
has
lasted up
to the present time
to be part of or
to
exist
in
research
into
thought
concerned
with
Qigong
and Human
paranormal
ability phenomena.
The term "pollution"
has recently often
been used
in
industry.
Things
which are polluted are
either difficult
to get
clean or
are completely
changed.
Pollution
is
directly injurious
to human
health.
If
it were
believed
that
"science" also
had
a
polluting
effect
on
the
study of
things,
it would
have been mentioned
long
ago.
This
article
points
out
that
the
spiritualistic
theory
of
electromagnetism which began
as
a 17th and lBth
century concept
of
force
and
has
developed
and
has been
passed on
to today without its true nature
having
been
revealed
should
not
be
used
in
research
into thought.
Otherwise,
knowledge
of
thought
will "continue
to be
bogged down
in
the
morass of metaphysics.
In order
to demonstrate this problem,
let
us
take
the
trouble
to
describe
the
nature
of
spiritual
doctrines of
today's electromagnetic
theories
As
I
pointed out
in
my
previous article,
"The Inobjectivity
of
the
Theory
of
Electromagnetism",
there
is no actual definition or
"objective"
definition
of
any
of
electromagnetic
forces
in
today's
theory
of
electromagnetism.
Because
we
first accepted universal
gravitation
and
then
proposed
electromagnetic
force,
therefore,
we
see
universal
gravitation
as
an objective
reality and
electromagnetic
force as not
an
objective reality.
The
reason
is
very
simple.
Because
we cannot
eliminate
this universal gravitation
and define electromagnetism.
Because
of
this,
do not believe
the descriptions
in
the electromagnetism
texts
.
In
these
it
is
held
that
it
is possible
to use an experimental
thing
called
"point
charge"
to
find
the
existence
of
an
electric
field.
Actually,
this
experimental
thing
called
a
"point charge"
is
a part of
what we originally believed was
the world
of
universal
gravitation.
Its
behavior
can
also
not
be
divorced
from
the reality of
this world
of
universal
gravitation.
Furthermore,
the
force
acting
on
this
"point
charge"
is only actual
force
and not electromagnetic
force.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
Today '5
theories
of
electromagnetism
cannot fail
to admit that the
force
in
electromagnetism
is
actual
force,
and
they
often
use the
following relationships
which use
the principle of superimposition
in
an
attempt
to extract an electromagnetic
force.
*-V
—?
~
‘T
f actual
force =
f electromagnetic
force
+
f universal
gravitational
force
<i)
Today's theory
of electromagnetism believes that the actual
force is
much
greater
(several
ten
of
orders
of
magnitude!
)
than
universal
gravitation,
so there
is
the following omitting method*
-
£
^
~f
actual
force
=
f electromagnetic
force
(2)
We
do
not
oppose
the
hypothesis
of
this
approximation,
but
our
predecessors haphazardly wrote
the formula
in
the following manner,
f
actual
force
=
force elec tromagnetic
force
(3)
which changes
the approximation
symbol
into an equals symbol.
This
is an
error
of
principle,
because
if
formula
(2)
illustrates
an omission
in
measurement,
then
if
it
is
reasonable
within
certain
permissible error
parameters,
then
this
formula
takes
universal
gravitational
force to
approximate
zero,
such as
f universal
gravitational
force * 0
(4)
But this
formula basically
still
accepts
the existence
of
the universal
gravitational
force.
However,
formula
(3)
sets universal gravitational
force at
zero,
such as
f universal
gravitational
force
=> 0
(5)
On
the surface,
the difference between
formulas
(4)
and
(5)
is only
that
the approximation
symbol
has
been changed
to the
equal
sign.
However,
formula
(5)
which
uses
the
equal
sign,
denies
the
existence
of
the
universal gravitational
force,
and
therefore,
using
the equal
sign denies
the existence of
the originally accepted world of
universal gravitational
force.
Therefore,
in
today's
theories of electromagnetism.
Maxwell's
equation doers not contain
any universal
gravitational
force
factor.
All
the
theories
developed
on
electromagnetism including
the "narrow sense"
theory of
relativity
are
only
applicable
when
no
gravitational
field
exists
.
This
type
of
results,
which
are
a
clear extreme departure from
reality,
should
have
caught
people's
attention
a
long
time
ago,
but
science has
rid
itself
of
the effects
of
human social
consciousness,
and
today's education
and
intelligence
tests
still
use
these traditional
theories,
and
in addition,
these bizarre
results form
a system with the
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
original
structure of
science,
so
it
i© not possible
to take one item at
a
time
to
expose their
fallacies or
spiritualistic nature.
It
is only
by
making
basic checks
that we discovered
that
all
electromagnetic forces
in
this theory
of electromagnetism
are baseless,
and are only
a concept of
thought.
If
we were
to believe
that
in reality there was such
a
thing
as
"point charge
1 '
and
"current
element" which
could actually
point out the
existence of electrical
fields
and magnetic
fields,
this would
be an error
of carelessness.
This
is
because
if
we actually hypothesized the actual existence of
electrical
fields,
and
also accepted
that electromagnetic
force were real,
then
the
definition
of
electromagnetic
force through the actual
force
which occurs
in electromagnetic
phenomena would necessarily
be
( 6 )
-—^
'—7^
>
f
elec tromagnetic
force
=
f
actual
force
-
f universal
gravitational
force
Then
by dividing
the entire formula
by the
test charge
qo,
we get
—
f electromagnetic
force
qo
( 7
)
—9
—
=
f
actual
force
-
f universal
gravitational
foroe
qo
qo
When
qo
approaches
zero
(just
as
dt
does
in
today's
theory
of
electromagnetism),
then
because universal
gravitational
force
is
a force
of
limited
size,
therefore
—^
^
^
E
= F ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE
=
F ACTUAL FORCE
=
infinity
qo
qo
and
E
is the so-called
objectively exist.
It
-9
strength of electrical
field
is
a
limited vector,
thus
f
actual
force
~
E
+ infinity
= infinity
qo
which
is believed
to
This
is
a very absurd
result.
The omission
in
the formula above has
retained
an unlimited
large vector
1 whcih
is
the actual
force acting
on
the experimental
charge
and
its proportional
value
to
the charge qo when
qo approaches zero
is
infinite.
This illustrates that
it
is not
what
is
described
in
the theory
of electromagnetism.
Although they believe that
by using
actual
force and experimental electric charge
it
is
possible
to
define
the
electrical
field.
To the contrary,
it illustrates that no
electrical
(magnetic)
force can
be measured.
This
is nothing
more than
"first define
then
ignore",
and
it has tremendously different results than
the
"first ignore
then define" methods mentioned earlier.
Is
this really
science?
We
often
hear
certain
protectors of
"traditional"
theories
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
strongly opposing research into
Qigong
and
human
paranormal
abilities,
believing
that
they
have
no scientific
basis,
that
they are refuted
by
science.
However,
who thought that this science would
have such
a flaw
in
it.
This also
illustrates that
the "existence" we are aware of,
such as
electrons,
the electron
model
atom
and
extending
from
this
to basic
molecules
and
physical
structure,
in actuality have concealed within them
thought factors just
like
the theory
of electromagnetism.
There
is no
reason for us blindly
to only recognize only one convention
of thought and
the theory established
on
this convention and not recognize that since one
convention of
thought can
be recognized,
then also
a second,
a third,
an
infinite
number
of
conventions.
Furthermore,
the
multiplicity
and
expansiveness of
this convention
is characteristic
of
thought.
Therefore,
it
is absurd
to attempt
to use one of
an infinite number of conventions on
thought
to frame the
laws and charac teristics of
thought.
Actually,
there
have
already
been
a
great
many
examples
which
illustrate that today’s
theory
of
electromagnetism
are
of
no
use
in
explaining
the
phenomena
of
Qigong and human paranormal
abilities.
Here
we would
like
to quote the
famous
Psi
scholar
Joseph
Banks
Rhine who
stated
in
his book
"The Reach
of
the Mind" which was published
in
1947*
"Certain scientists are interested
in strange
abilities.
It
is because
they
erroneously
believe
that
these
abilities
can
be
ascribed
to
electromagnetic
theory of
the natural
world.
However,
when they discover
that the
results
transcend
the principles of
physics that they drop this
research subject
like
a hot potato."
,
We
feel
that
this
is correct.
If
that scientist
did not
drop this
research
subject
immediately,
then
he
would
have been rebuked
by
the
" protec tors"
and beneficiaries of
traditional
theory
or that
he himself
was
a beneficiary and was not willing
to take such
a social
risk.
Rhine accurately
reported
the fears the scholars of
that time
had
of
Psi.
He
also
reported
the
problems
apparent
in
the electromagnetic
theory.
However as
a parapsychologist,
he was
not able
to reveal
how
predecessors
had
been able
to use thought
to
establish their
own science
or to
reveal
the subtle relationship between thought and science.
He was
even
less able
to see how scientists
had used
zero
to achieve
magical
and
unintentional
fallacious
result.
This
is very regrettable.
Actually,
the
difference between
the
two following
two
equations
is
only
a
single dot
'
.
f universal
gravitational
force
= 0
—^
f universal
gravitational
force =
( 10 )
and
it
is
just
because
of
the
problem in principle of equating
this
approximation
symbol
and
the equal
sign was
too
hidden
that
his academic
ideas were
not universally noted
but were
to the contrary was
looked down
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6