datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
SG1A Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230005-5 Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230005-5
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 700230005-5
\fi4r
tyg.s7sM
'
THIS BRIEFING HAS COVERED THE HISTORY OF INSCOM AND
THE
GRILL FLAME PROGRAM
,
HOW HE BEGAN
IN THE
PROGRAM, AND SOME OF THE ACTIONS
WE HAVE BEGUN
-
TO
IMPROVE OUR PRODUCT .
OUR OBJECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE
CONCERN:
SELECTION OF
PEOPI F
.
VG 17 ON
VG 17 OFF
VG 18 ON
VG 18 OFF
AND
'
INCREASE THE RELIABILITY OF REMOTE VIEWING
.
IN SUMMARY:
THE COLLECTION OF
INTELLIGENCE THROUGH REMOTE VIEWING
HAS DEMONSTRATED
ITS VALUE.
REMOTE VIEWING
IS A
SUCCESSFUL COLLECTION METHOD (NOT AN EXPERIMENT )
,
THE PROFESSIONAL
INTELLIGENCE ANALYSTS WHO ASSIGN
US PROJECTS,
EVALUAIEJJS ONLY BY THE
INTELLIGENCE WE
PRODUCE.
REMOTE VIEWING SHOULD NEVER STAND ALONE ,
BUT
SHOULD BE USED
IN CONJUNCTION WITH
INFORMATION FROM
OTHER
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES,
REMOTE VIEWING
IS PASSIVE,
I NEXPENSIVE .
THERE
IS
NOEFENSE AND THERE
IS NO RISK OF COLLECTION COMPROMISE.
1HIS CONCLUDES THE BRIEFING,
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
Approved For Release 2003/09/
00788R001 700230005-5
ee FOR OFFIGIAL Usk UNLT SG1I SG1I SG1A SG1I SG1I SG1I SG1I Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230006-4 IAGPC- C 25 June 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 1. (FOUO) At 1300 hours, 23 June 1982, I met with NSA at his office meeting was requested by 2. (Fouo) [_——_—sd expkined that LTG Faurer, Director NSA had been exposed to GRILL FLAME some time ago by Dr. Jack Vorona, DIA, who knew LTG Faurer when he was assigned at DIA. At a recent meeting Dr. Vorona suggested LTG Faurer receive a briefing on what Army (INSCOM) was doing in the GRILL FLAME area. was asked by LTG Faurer tp arrange the briefing. : 3. (FOUO) I told[ __|that I had no objections to briefing LTG Faurer but would have to request approval from my superiors and inform DIA, (Dr. Vorona) since they were the DOD project Director. I © further stated the briefing would be a 30-45 minute presentation with . class B viewgraphs and a project book; and it was not a fancy "dog and pony show". [ __ ]requested I notify him when approval was received and then we could then arrange to get on LTG Faurer's calendar. 4 (FOUO) I also gavel _ brief overview of our activities and a short summary of selected projects. RB. Sachuns _ ROBERT J. JACHIM LTC, MI GRILL FLAME Project Manager SG1I SG1I SG1I Approved For Rele FOR OFFICIAL USE ONL 0637/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230006-4
fOK OMUIAL mt mu
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 700230006-4
IAGPC-
G
25 June 1982
SGI
I
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT :
Meeting
-
SGI
I
SG1A
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
1.
(FOUO)
At
1300 hours,
23 June 1982.
I met with
NSA at his office
meeting
u/as requested by
NSA.
The
SGI
SGI
2.
(FOUO)
I
I exoMned that LTG Faurer, Director NSA had been
exposed to GRILL FLAME some time ago by Dr.
Jack Vorona, DIA, who
knew LTG Faurer when he was assigned at DIA.
At a recent meeting
Dr.
Vorona suggested LTG Faurer rec eive
a briefing on what Army
(INSCOM)
was doing
in
the GRILL FLAME
area,
tp arrange the briefing.
was asked by LTG Faurer
SGI
I
3.
(FOUO)
I
told
that
I had no objections to briefing
LTG Faurer but would have to request approval from my superiors and
inform DIA,
(Dr.
Vorona)
since they were the DOD project Director.
I
further stated the briefing would be
a 30-45 minute presentation with
SGI
pony show".
received and then we coui
^requested
lid then ar
I notify him when approval was
range
to get
on LTG Faurer 's
calendar.
4.
(FOUO)
I also gave
a brief overview of our activities
and a
3hort summary
of selected projects.
R.'JocIwma^
ROBERT
J.
JACHIM
LTC,
MI
GRILL FLAME Project Manager
Approved For Relejfekr2©03/09/l6
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 700230006-4
SG1A SG1I SG1I ~ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONY Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230008-2 TAGPC~G 16 July 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR .ADCSOPS-HUMINT SUBJECT: GRILL FLAME Briefing for Director, NSA ~ 1. A briefing for. LTG Lincoln Faurer, Director, NSA has. been scheduled SG1 for 1500 hours, 5 August 1982 at the Director's Conference Room HQ NSA. The. briefing was requested by RGI1I Research and Engineering. Scheduled attendees are: LTG LINCOLN FAURER : DIRECTOR ROBERT E. RICH (GS-18) °" — DEPUTY. DIRECTOR 2. J initially met with at his request, on 23 June 1982 at his office, building 1, NSA. explained that LTG Faurer, Director, NSA had been exposed to GRILL FLAME some time ago by Dr. Jack .Vorona, DIA, who knew LTG Faurer when he was assigned at DIA. At a recent meeting Dr. Vorona suggested LTG Faurer receive a briefing on what. Army. (INSCOM) was doing in the GRILL FLAME area. [was asked by LTG Faurer SG1I to arrange the briefing. ROBERT J. JACHIM LTC, MI -GRILL FLAME Project Manager Approved For ReledSedOBRHHAE CUSEORRG-9o788R001700230008-2
Mel a Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002700080008-7 ' 1 TASKING SHEET SOURCE NO: 025 DATE: 11 Apr _ 94 SUSPENSE: 12 Apr 94 1600 Hrs 1. PROJECT NUMBER: 94-233-0 2. METHOD/TECHNIQUE: Method of Choice 3. BACKGROUND: 4. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF INFORMATION: Access and describe Target. 5. COMMENTS: Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002700080008-7
pe * * Approved For Release 2008 ib fr 2e-co7esn00t7002s0000-1 TAGPC~G AUG 26 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: NSA Involvement in GRILL FLAME (S) 1. (U) Reference CG, INSCOM information requirement, 26 August 1982. 2. (S/NOFORN) The following information was obtained during conversations ~with NSA personnel on 27 August 1982. No direct questions were asked‘ SG1B a. (S/NOFORN) Internal designation of NSA activity in parapsychology is (This was obtained as[ J was: explaining NSA SG1I effort in meeting 27 August 1982.), S/NOFORN) NSA has no active remote viewers. (Private conversation SG1I 27 August 1982) 3. S/NOFORN) Because of questions and requests for material, ad’by SG1I I believe no personnel have been selected, nor any training program devised, Following are samples: a. How are people selected? b. How involved is (staff) psychologist in the selection? c. Which battery of psychological tests are administered? d. How often do Remote Viewers meet with the (staff) psychologist? fi e. Can a copy of our screening questionaire be provided? (€opy provided without scoring key.) , f. What open source material is available? (Provided copies of articles from Signal and Omni Magazines and IEEE article by Dr. Jahn, Dean Engineering School, Princeton University.) g. What type internal training program do you have? h. What type training did SRI provide in the past? i. How often does SRI offer training? j» Are any ex-project participants at NSA? 4. (S/NOFORN) Dr Hal Puthoff, SRI, contacted [_]t tell him SG1I 1 some of their funding had not materialized and invite m (NSA) to come NSA TAYSSSLGUP Rebethe Rh aid ‘pa. n0Pe6-00788R001700230009-1 tb -4 ar
SG1I Approved For Release zooaoordCiARGP6-ooreeR001700220000-1 TAGPC-G SUBJECT: NSA Involvement in GRILL FLAME (S) into the program. [ __ indicated he was noncommittal. 5, (FOUO) Information was passed to COL Miller 27 August 1982. Per COL Miller's direction it was passed to COL Hyman via secure phone on 27 August 1982. ROBERT J. JACHIM LTC, MI GRILL FLAME Project Manager Approved For Release 2004/09/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700230009-1
DP96-00788R001 700230009-1
Approved For Release 200
IAGPC-G
AUGj?©j9Q2
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT:
NSA Involvement
in GRILL FLAME
(S)
SG1B
SG1I
SGI
I
1.
(U)
Reference
CG,
INSCOM information requirement,
26 August
1982.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
The following information was obtained during conversations
with NSA personnel
on
27 August
1982.
No direct questions were
asked*.
is
a.
(S/NOFORN)
effort
in meeting 27 August
1982. H
Internal designati on
of NSA
activity
in parapsychology
I was explaining NSA
SGI
I
(This was obtained as
-Ll.
(S/NOFORN)
NSA has no active remote viewers.
27 August
1982.)
(Private conversation
3.
(S/NOFORN)
Because of questions and requests for material,
as by
| l believe no personnel have been selected, nor any
training program devised.
Following are samples:
a.
How
are. people selected?
b.
How involved is
(staff)
psychologist
in
the selection?
c.
Which battery
of psychological tests are administered?
d.
How often
do Remote Viewers meet with the
(staff)
psychologist?
S*
e.
Can
a copy of
our screening questionjbire be provided?
(£opy
provided without scoring
key,)^
f.
What open source material
is available?
(Provided copies of
articles from Signal and Omni Magazines and
IEEE article by Dr.
Jahn,
Dean Engineering School^
Princeton
University.]
g.
What type internal training program
do you have?
h.
What type training did SRI provide
in the past?
i.
How often does SRI offer training?
j.
Are any ex-project participants at NSA?
4.
(S/N0F0RN)
Dr Hal Puthoff,
SRI,
contacted
to tell him
SG1I
some of their funding had not materialized and invited him
(NSA)
to come
NSA
IA-RDP96-00788R001 700230009-1
s*
.1
Approved For Release 2004/09/1
00788R001 700230009-1
SG1I
IAGPC-G
SUBJECT:
NSA Involvement
in GRILL FLAME
(S)
into the program.
indicated
he
vi/as noncommittal.
5.
(F0U0)
Information
vi/as passed to COL Miller 27 August
1982.
Per
COL Miller's direction
it was passed to COL Hyman
via secure phone
on
27 August
1982.
ROBERT
J.
JACHIM
LTC,
MI
GRILL FLAME Project Manager
Approved For Release 2004/09/09
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 700230009-1
2... ———— eV Date ApProveddeUTneer AHOZTRANSMETAU/SHBP96-00788R001700230010-9 TO: (Name, office symbol, room number, Date uilding, Agency/Post) 1. 8. Action.—SSCC*d‘Cd lle =| Note and Return Approval’ __| |ForClearance__|_|Per Conversation As Requested | |For Correction _| | Prepare Reply Circulate | |For Your Information| |See Me Comment | [Investigate i Signature Coordination | [Justify REMARKS NO Release wiITRooT my CONCORRENCE 2 Jochuw, 1 sepd2 DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, clearances, and similar actions FROM: (Name, org. symbol, Agency/Post) Room No.—Bldg. ApprovediFettRelease 2003/09/16 : CIA-RISSSO MHZ ABEN dit O8334010-9 sie -U. S.GPO:1977-0-244-360 FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.206
Date
Approvedfj0UrHj^^gM}2QfCM99MQTiai/SEIBP96-OO788ROO1 70023001 0-9
Date
TO: (Name, office symbol, room number,
building, Agency/Post)
1.
S.
REMARKS
Initials
K.
-
— Artinn
Note and Return
annmual
Per Conversation
—
tSESBSIBSKKtM
Prepare Reply
—
For Your Information
_ See Me
Investigate
Signature
Coordination
Justify
—
MO
R0J0ftS£
UJ'TV^OOr
^
,^Jqc11uaaa>
,
1 S€p <S2_
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, xoncurrences.
disposals.
clearances, and similar actions
FROM: (Name, org. symbol, Agency/Post)
Approvsid4Fd92 Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RI
^ u. S.GPO;1977-0-244-360
Room No.—Bldg.
Phone No.
FPMR (41 CFW) 101-11.206
Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3 Table 5 Two-Sample t-Test Results Mensa/Peninsula | Mensa/Palo Alto Two Sample t Peninsula/Palo Alto 3.947 Degrees of Freedom p-Value Effect Size As measured by the effect size, the only “meaningful” comparison is between San Francisco Mensa with the Stanford Alumni Club of Palo Alto. It is premature to conclude, however, that something exists within Mensa that predisposes its members toward possessing remote viewing ability. There are a number of problems that prevent such a conclusion. First of all, the analyst was not blind to the groups, and thus could distort the scoring. Even if the analyst were blind, however, such a conclusions would still be unwarranted, because of the lack of statistical independence among the subjects. Additional circumstantial evidence in favor of Mensa would be realized if the seven individuals chosen for the second-stage screening continue to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing ability. On Second-Stage Results Although there were a total of eight persons from the first-stage screening who showed qualitative evidence of potential exceptional remote viewing abilities, none participated in second-stage screening in FY 1989 becasue of timing and/or availability. These eight individuals will be invited to participate in invidualized second-stage screenings as part of the FY 1990 screening work. In accordance with the FY 1989 Statement of Work—Task 6.0.5, we asked a long-time remote viewer who has produced quality results in dream and Ganzfeld studies conducted at Maimonides Medical Center in the Division of Parapsychology (1972-1978), to participate in a second-stage screening. Table 7 shows the target and the rank assignments for each of Viewer 389’s eight trials. The resulting sum of ranks was 11 (» S 0.0025, effect size = 1.01). A 75% hitting rate (6 of 8 first-place matches) where the mean expectation is 25% is the best we have obtained for any of our second-stage screenings during the past two years. Viewer 389 has joined our research program and is currently participating in one experiment. 11 Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3
Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3 Table 6 Results of Second-Stage Screening with Viewer 389 Project Blue Book Manhattan Project Skiing Atomic Bomb Blasts Tacoma Narrows Bridge Greek Temple Tacoma Narrows Bridge Project Deep Quest D. Conclusions In the past, the group screening procedure has been successfull in selecting people with natural remote viewing ability. Two individuals from approximately 200 were asked to become regular remote viewers in the Cognitive Sciences Program. Because of scheduling difficulties, successfull candidates from this year’s first-stage screening have yet to participate in the second-stage. Even if all of these candidates satisfy the second-stage requirements, this screening procedure is a labor-intensive and time-consuming method of identifying individuals with natural ability for high quality remote viewing. 12 Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200590001-3
Approved For Release 2001/03/07
: CIA-RDP96-00789R003400420002-7
yyyAHX
CJjjL
L
a
vyw ^aa\_ \yXJ
aXl as^aaam> Jmo
(jUyih^ 0^
fyywX^Mhry^-
qs(X ^vvw aX^X
(5/t/
f
x@
A^T^
!ve9n^bf
t^lea/§e^i6^1^^)7
i
?CIA-RDP96-00789R003400420002-7
(CAR Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-00% oh B007700230013-6 TAGPC-G R 0 : MEMORANDUM OFR RECORD SGI SUBJECT: Meeting with SG1l 1. (C) On 7 September 1982, from 0900 - 1100. I attended a meeting at buildingl Meeting was a continuation-of a 3 September 1982 meeting. Attendees were: SG1I 2. cs /wor Morn) Purpose of the meeting was to obtain feedback from Remote Viewing Session 932 conducted on 31 August 1982. An evaluation SG1I signed byl] vas provided. 3, (S/NOFORN) A discussion of project 8207 took up most of the meeting. Feedback for the Remote Viewing (Session 932) was provided by the NSA representatives. Specific EEL for the next session was developed. ( for feedback and EEI see project 8207). ; SG1I 4. (S/NOFORN) The last portion of the meeting concerned a second target. It was agreed that the target would be a blind target, delivered by sci1| ina sealed envelope just prior_to the session. After the session the envelope would be returned to assured me this was not a test case but a valid sensitive, compartmented, intelligence target, Cuing data was developed for the target. (see project 8207). ROBERT J. JACHIM LTC, MI GRILL FLAME Project Manager
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP96
0230013-6
IAGPC-G
MEMORANDUM OFR RECORD SQ1
|
SUBJECT:
Meeting with
SG11
1.
fC')
On
7' September
1982, from 0900
-
1100.
I attended a meeting^
at building f
t
Meeting was
a continuation -of
a
3 September U82
meeting.
Attendees were:
SG1I
I
I
(S/NOf/oRN)
Purpose of the meeting was to obtain feedback from
Remote Viewing Session 932 conducted on
31 August 1982.
An evaluation
SGI
I gigned by
|
| was provided.
SGI
I
3.
(5/N0F0RN)
A discussion of project 8207 took up most
of the meeting.
Feedback for the Remote Viewing
(Session
932)
was provided by the N5A
representatives.
Specific
EEI
for the next session was developed.
(
for
feedback and EEI see project 8207).
(S/N0F0RN)
The last portion of the meeting concerned a second target.
It was agreed that the target would be a blind target,
delivered by
|
in
a sealed envelope just pri or
to the session.
After
the session
ie
envelope would be returned to
I
~~1 asf^
d me thf
wa? not
a test case but
a valid sensitive,
compartmented,
intelligence target.,
Cuing data was developed for the target,
(see project 8207).
SGI
ROBERT
J.
JACHIM
LTC,
MI
GRILL FLAME Project Manager
n
: V, l ,'ij^
Approved For Release 2003/09/16
: CIA-RDP
msL, a
88R001 70023001 3-6
SG1I SG1A SG1I Approved For Release 20031 IAGPC-C 3 Sep B20 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting vith> | SGi1I 1. (C) On 27 August 1982, 900 hours I met with [NSA at his of fice | | — SG1l was in response to his request. S/NOFORN) After an initial greeting to the offic SG1l corner room) (position unknown) with was SG1I another individual, who was introduced but whose n T cannot remember. After some preliminary discussion we were joined by position SG1I unknown. The purpose of the meeting was to provide me with an NSA target, to be worked on by the GRILL FLAME Collection Technique. 3, (S/NOFORN) I provided some basic information on the capabilities 4. and method of operation. We then discussed four potential targets selected one. to work against. We then discussed target Sig! data and the amount of information to be given the interviewer. 4, Meeting ended at 1100 hours. ROBERT J. JACHIM LTC, MI GRILL FLAME Project Manager Approved For Release 200s BEAR Yoooe-covearo0:700200014- SOl-Y%- 7
SG1I
SG1A
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2003/
P96-00788R001 70023001 4-5
IAGPC-G
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT:
Meeting with
3 Sep 82
1.
(c)
On
27 August 1982,
at 0900 hours
I
met with
NSA at his office
was
in response to his request.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
After
an initial greeting to the offic^_Qf
*
L—1
\
/
> mnfh
Meeting
another individua1:
Ul
J.1
I j- w-L-w* —
-J
corner
room)
(position unknown) with
a nf
was
position
After some preliminary discussion we were joined by
l
unknown.
The purpose of
the meeting was
to provide me with an NSA target,
to be worked
on by the GRILL FLAME Collection Technique.
(S/N0F0RN)
I provided some basic information on the capabilities
and method of operation.
We then discussed four potentialtargets p£d
selected one
to work against.
We then discussed target king' data and
the amount of information
to be given
the interviewer.
4.
Meeting ended at 1100 hours.
. Ooritu/wv
ROBERT
J.
JACHIM
LTC,
MI
GRILL FLAME Project Manager
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
SGI
I
Approved For Release 2003:
P96-00788R001 700230014-5
jvf-y - 7
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002302430001-7 SESSION INFORMATION A. ‘TARGET DATA: Aids/Distractions (PIs) Pre-session hunches (AVS) Date Summary Returned Task/Target No. : 92-8 Session No. H o1 B. PERSONNEL DATA: Source No. 4 025 Monitor’s No. : Beacon/Sender No. : C. SESSION DATA: Date Task Received : 2/6/92 Session Date : 2/7/92 Start Time : 1230 Stop Time : 1330 Method used : ERV D. EVALUATION DATA: Viewer’s Estimate Evaluator’s Estimate E. SESSION SUMMARY: The target site consists of grass lands and natural objects which are protruding or raised upward on the ground. These objects are heavy, long and narrow posts, designed in a circle or semi-circle, and made out of wood or stone. They mark the spot. This old site has a mystical quality and is somewhat isolated in location. There is a wonderful energy emanating from this spot. People visit this place to see or experience it and to gain wisdom. Some people may even consider this place healing in nature. This site signifies an event involving people long ago. Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002302430001-7
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
DAMI-ISH
6 January 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT;
Briefing
for SA
(U)
1.
(S/CL-3/NOFORN)
SA was briefed,
per his
request,
on
5 Jan 84 on Mr.
Bob Monroe,
Executive Director,
Monroe
Institute
of Applied Science
(MIAS)
and
INS COM' s association with MIAS.
Present at
the meeting were
SA,
the Director of the Army Staff,
LTC Brewer (Military Assistant
to
SA)
,
CENTER LANE Project
Manager,
CENTER LANE Operations Officer,
and
the undersigned.
SA was provided
the attached
Information Paper
and
copies of MIAS
literature.
2.
(U)
Topics discussed
included;
a.
(U)
Biographic
and personal opinion data on Mr.
Monroe,
an Army contractor.
b.
(U)
INS COM' s association with Mr. Monroe and MIAS;
(1)
(S / CL- 1/N0F0RN)
Training of GRILL FLAME personnel
in
the past.
(2)
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
Current advanced
training
for
CENTER LANE personnel.
(3)
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
Rapid Acquisition ^Training
(RAPT)
(INSCOM's
involvement with RAPT
is unclassified;
CENTER LANE's
involvement with RAPT
is
compartroented)
.
(4)
(U)
Plan
for INSCOM's Center for Excellence
(CENTEX)
to use MIAS/Hemi-Synch technology.
c.
(U)
RAPT;
(1)
S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
Reasons
for sending Army personnel
to RAPT
.
.
Screening
of prospective source personnel
for
CENTER LANE.
Classified
by Cdr,
INSC0M
, r^r
D/HA.HD CARRY
Declassify on;
OADR
LLv
-
-
nni p-leasable to
FOi.hUU UATIOiiALS
i Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
DAMI-ISH
SUBJECT:
Briefing
for SA
(U)
.
Sensitize
intelligence managers
and consumers
to
intelligence applications of psychoenergetics.
.
High performance.
.
Personal gain
(as
a fringe benefit).
(2)
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
What do you really gain from RAPT?
.
Conducive state
for Remote Viewing.
.
"Tool
kit"
that you must
learn
to
apply.
(Including
stress
reduction,
concentration,
enhanced
learning
ability,
etc. )
.
(3)
(U)
The use of Hemi-Synch
to
learn language
(apparently SA
is
interested
in
this aspect for himself).
(4)
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
Why do you need
to sensitize
intelligence managers concerning CENTER LANE?
Give an example.
.
ISA request
for CENTER LANE support used
as
an
example.
.
Different kind
of product.
.
Compartmented
tasking.
.
Capabilities and
limitations.
d.
(S/CL-1/N0F0RN)
SA raised
the
issue of whether CENTER
LANE met
the Congressional guidelines and
satisfied
the Human Use
legal
standards.
We answered yes
to both question areas
and
reminded
him of
the discussion we had with Mr.
Spurlock and
him
on
these points during
the
5 Oct 83 briefing.
3.
(U)
The briefing seemed
to be extremely well
received by SA
and his parting words were
that he would be talking
to
us
again
soon.
4.
(U)
After
the briefing LTC Brewer desired
to continue
the
conversation
in
the SA foyer.
Points addressed
included;
r:CT FriFAS/lDLE TO
ii«T!CfsALS
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
DAMI-ISH
SUBJECT:
Briefing
for SA
(U)
a.
(C)
Date of
the next RAPT
session.
We
told
him
20 Jan 84,
but
suggested
that
the RAPT was
too
long
a course
for
SA
to go
to.
(Our private
feelings are
that
the presence of SA
at
a RAPT would possibly be disruptive
and we
question whether he
would be able
to
fully participate,
especially
in
terms
of
the
desired
isolation
from
the outside world.
Though not mentioned,
it
is also
a possibility that SA would want
to
send LTC Brewer
to
a RAPT.)
We also commented
that cover and compartmentation must
be considered
and LTC Brewer agreed.
b.
(S/CL-3/N0F0RN)
We offered
for consideration
the
idea of
a one-on-one between SA and Mr.
Monroe,
possibly with an over-
night
stay at MIAS.
LTC Brewer thought
that
this was
a very
viable alternative.
We
requested
that
such a meeting be coor-
dinated
through CENTER LANE because of their close relationship
with Mr.
Monroe.
GERALD FOX
LTC,
GS
HUMINT Division
r.ci vrsr
f riE to
i uwi-.tu.
i.f« nwuAi-S
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5
<>4 y4 c-
/
Os
*
/
%tr
x
/
/<*/
( * W
.* ir
•
?
t
i r
OS
/
°f s
y
<—<-
t <J&~
^
S<m t /OV^
C ^^yr^JU^O
yjjL
***~° ^
_5i
-^
—-
/k^A^ y^o^.
cAjitk
pu^
yc <
**~c-
/.
- c-ov/fV
/^zS’o/t-^A* l^A
^*^4)
/{? c^Xp_J
— Ctryv,
•
y*i „.*w
Approved For Release 2008/06/16
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 70027001 0-5