Approved For Release
r-' PV’
S
%
'r'dlAx-fcDP&6-00789R00200031 0002-4
during the time period
April
1987
to
15 May
1987,
source
continued:
a=—
Monitoring and
a tes t of
sqjne sort which
I nvolved precision
mechanical
sounds,
periodic checking by people
in white
coats with Clipboards
who” were walking on what appeared to
be big catwalks
inside
a
large enclosed area.
This area
seemed similar
to the
inside of an aircraft 'carrier with
intertwined
latt ice framework and stair
s
goi ng from level
to
le vel
.
™An area
a
l ong way down undergrou nd was
important
Tn some way
(not further explained).
The metal Cbr1 stmas
tree
fell
down.
It broke
in
two,
two thirds
of the way up.
The bottom part
fell
into
itself and
down.
People were
looking
up and there
was
a roai^
l
ames befor e the
collapse
as
if something
hi t ~TTT"m!r^^Tier<^T7as‘‘‘7ro
,Tbx:pl os i on .
It was as
if
a big hand drove
it down
or buckled
it down.
There was
a
l ot
of power
he re,
potential energy here,
a
lot
of tension,
mechanical
tension.
‘There was a rapid 'chain of
events
like
it began
to buckle first
then
exploded.
It
looked almost
like
a grain silo
in
Iowa 'being Blown apart.
(Note:
From this point on
tbe source refers to this
structure
as
the silo and not the Christmas
tree.)
The
cause of
all
this has something to do with
a thing on high
mechanical
legs,
like tripod legs
(not further identified).
During
the second
interview the ^ource
was told that the
concepts
of monitoring and
a test were
of
interest.
The
source stated that
the
area was reminiscent of
the
.....
l^ncasterZflar^j^
aeseri.
Ykere was
~an
ugl
y
J!ib"tnce^T.ilce structure"^?sT^le
a
berm.
This structures
primary component was underground.
There was
a crescent
shape
(array)
of metallic
(poles
with)
crosses
Interconnected
(to one another)
and
(all)
facing
in
(towards
the curve
of
the crescent)
.
At the end
of
the crescent
was
a hugh metallic coffee
pot shaped structure.
This structure
had
l somethi n g )
to do wi€K
laT tremendous amount of kinet ic
energy
(see further description
below)
that was kep t
""
^circulatin g
(within
the structure)
.
There was testing and
%.
monitoring going on at this
locatiorff
After
a final
check,
men
(in
the area)
moved out
of
the
way.
There
was
(an
impression
of)
some thing
sp it
into the sky which went
up
to
apogee,
curved toward
orb!
and TTTen
WAs broken
into two
c oiaponents~by
a boTi
(see further
des cr i pt ion"
,”bei o$r)~whi ch
may have come
ronT the hugh coffee
pot structure.
This
( i nci den t /test )
w^^^^SAiccess
.
An
individual
in
the bunker
was
able
to contro l
the perceived size
of
the success by
manipulating
the '¥ igures/statistics.
The primary prospects
for success
for
the coffee
pot
were
long
range.
Pressure,
however,
may be exerted to emphasize
the short range goals
at
the expense
of
the
long range
picture.
There
was the
hint
of subterfuge with one
of
the personnel
here
(not
further
identified).
The coffee
pot had something to do
X
Approved For Release 20QOf
-RDP96-00789R00200031 0002-4
"Approved For Release 2000/08/08 reiA:R
,Dl
:>96-0b789R00200031 0002-4
With
(the concept
of)
bracketing
(as used
in
the Ur.pHn.
.
°rUl^ry rounds)
and
it may be connected
in someday
with
a
pi atiorffi-^nthe sky
(see furthSF d^ription
b£l£w)
r-LIff
^
an object pushing
up against another object
causing a tremendous potential
energy,
coiled ener^v
greater than the sum of tT& parTsTTfTe energy increased
geometrical, ly as opposed to ari thmeti cal ly. ** (Note •
None
of
these descriptives should
be taken
literallv
Si’
N
f
was obviously trying to explain
a
concep t
for which there
ctn!J
) af>Pr0
. riate words.)
The energy was built
up
and
there
recirculated,
but TKZ potential
was aT&ays
of the cof^e
e
Do^£y tZ* aSSOCiated with the bottom portion
ox
t-ne coffee
pot.
The energy was
kept circulating
different than
a storage battci™" the enef^
Was always
ttarioo^
Ur
a ^^t-CSSi-flvid and there
was something
bruihe!?
wt.
Pl ff-
of Pushes
(as
in electric motor
*
h
l\
^!?f
n thln£S Passed by the brushes there
was
..
i
r
fr
thing
(that took
the place of the brushes)
tit ft ^fferently.
When
the energy flowed by there
was
more efficiency since
the brushes
had" been replaced.
The
bu^t“o„
P^
ti^l?f
llndriCal
in
a
itseltV
*.° describe the entire sequence of events
again
to include further descriptions of the image of the
£ol+
ource
s description was essentially as
fol lows
:
*’*“*
7* was 7 ke
a U-ght
bolt,
of
light,
like something hit
"Somith?^
6.^
. 00."66 POt Mts th is; ^
is confusing^
arc U
-L f ?i
orbit,
starting to go into the
Viuhf!
lt
. hlt
(ancw^oes
into pieces.”
"Something
is
,
,,
.
c“rvi «£i
it meets something like
a bolt.”
”(The)
"?tL Jon? n£
, d°un
something
in the
.
(The bolt)
originates from something
in
the air
^ &
~
(something)
that drifts.”
”The bolt comes down fro.
a Ko„m
”The
hol*+
*
•
S°?fthinS higher up hits
it
will*
the
Hull.-*—
’
Jhe *°\k^Uth±±e,
almos t opaq ue,
extremely rapid
directed, channeled. ”
”I’m sti
confused. ”
events pertaini ng^^this
incident ‘ind^^to dM«ib2*2l T"thfe°
f
f~E?s
this
incident then went essentially as follow:
P
’’(Within)
the coffee pot
(there
is)
a building
un of
•
”(At)
the ugly bunker
(there)
is"monitoring
reporting,
relaying
information,
watching
(all
of which form
••At thi
1^ fh°
US
?
f th ? h"-" activity
, in
the bun^r.f""”
further
iH
7 S waiting,
bouncing back and off
(not
further
identified).
Back
at
the coffee
pot
(there
is)
a
Approved For Release 2AAflttMtt^UQBS£J^9R0020
"Approved For Release 2000/08/oL.klAiRDea6t00789R002000310002-4
°f
G " ep^'
climbing,
climbing. ”
“The bunker
(is)
record^n^
’
k° ^3Gcti ^S
t
almost aiming,
digitalizing,
computing,
reaohfn
\?
h
u?kln£‘
°ver at
the sll °
<there
is)
monitoring,
but
likf’ii
i
n
^i?
aC
°Ut ‘”
” (At the bunker)
running fround
??
3 f^ 11
'
n°
Panlc '
# ’
"Whatever the hell
is going on
~Thi
as
. succefsful
in
a way that points
the way to
( the ) future
.
This
is
a step not a final
conclusion.”
SG1E
_
aaaress
spec:
following information
was
related;
Potentials
for success;
c
tasking questions.
The
A two path answer
-
long and short
range.
Given
certain constants and licenses,
chances for success and
broadening or crossing over
into other areas were very
good.
Immediate success was
less important except
as
a
stepping stone
for
the
long range,
although
immediate
success
wes also
likely.
The concept
of success was
modified up or down by the manipulation of data thus
making success relative.
One needed
a correlation,
a
small
success
to compare
it against.
Strengths:
Newness,, its novelty,
detect
,
diff icult to counter
many other
areas.
>
It was difficult to
It opened the way for
Weakness
:
It was
bujjky and took time
to prepare and to build
energy.
At this point reli ability could only be
—
aSS
!JTf? Wlth extraordinary preparation.
Under routine
conditions reliability decreases.
It was costly.
It
required
a
large number of these coffee
pot'gT”"
Politically
it
was difficult
to justify
in
a ' way for
it
road
C°nCept whose benefit
v*5s
a
long way down the
Interviewer
Note:
Source became very confused during the
interview and was unable to clearly and sequentially trace the
?^?urJ°t
nr
nentS Utllize
?, in
incident.
Evenki £h Ihie
i f
,
the source
was
able
to convey the
impression
of
a
hi^h-
in
some sort
in which
an overhead platform" was
involved
out »n+
n
5h
10n
W1^
3 ground based system of tremendous energy
output.
The
result
was
the
interception
of
a fast moving object
ootentJaf
f° r
?
ub-°rbital
fli S bb *
The
test
was
a succesf and
£he
potential
for future successes
was apparently great.
Source provided no further amplifying information which could
be
M \ tZ
Approved For Release 2
-00789R00200031 0002-4
96-00789R00200031 0002-4
Approved For Release
construed to concern
the nature and scope
of
the
project's potential
for success
,
or the project's strengths and
weaknesses.
SG1A
3.
(S/SK/WNINTEL)
The above SUN STREAK sources,
although not
in
complete agreement,, seemed to have collectively described an
incident
(test)
which
involved several
different
locations
or
structures ,
one
or more
of which may have
been
in
flight.
The
test
involved energy or
proj ected
en ergy
,Qf
some sor ^-
and
resulted
in
the destruction
of
a target by unusual
burning
or
a
peculiar explosive effect.
"
~
~~
.
(S/SK/WNINTEL)
Direct access
to raw transcript
information
is
limited to personnel
with SKEET access
only.
If access
to
this
information
is necessary,
contact DT—S directly to arrange
for
an appointment to review appropriate transcript.
SKEET
transcripts are not releasable outside the confines of the SUN
STREAK office.
5.
(S/SK/WNINTEL)
Enclosed herewith
is an
Intelligence
Evaluation Sheet
(IES)
(TAB
C)
.
Please annotate one
appropriately for each source
(make necessary copies)
and return
the sheets to DT-S
(Ops)
within
30 days
of receipt
of this
report.
Care and diligence
in annotating this
IES will
aid m
the refinement of SUN STREAK assets and thereby enhance SUN
STREAK'S ability to provide €^*^^3 inf ormht ion of intelligence
value.
3 Enclosures
TAB A
&
B Sketches
TAB C
IES
Approved For Release 200B/08/Q8T<pA-RPP96-00789R00200031 0002-4