Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08^i! (^F|DP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
PRODUCT I DIM REPORT BY METHODOLOGY
V I EWER
CRV
ERV
WRV
SOLO
003
'p<y
:!.
01 1
n
O 1 8
nr.
‘.-I
(
"Tl
q
032
049
S
Q
t'
i
J
i,*
1 \.j
.<*>.
:l.
1 02
(..)V
:i. 9
< 24/n >
I
(5« 3X)
190
(24X)
3 <::> 2
CRV
[ .) oo
}•" cj
:i. n <va
'
t. e
Rem o 'It. e
V:i. ewi ng
ERV
E-
t en d ed Remote
V:i. ewi ng
WEV
--
Wr
:i. 1. 1. en Remot e
v i ewi n g
.
S0L0
•-
I n d ep en d en t.
Remo t e
V
:i. ewing..
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
PRODUCT :c ON REPORT BY PROJECT
CY
' 89
PROJE
8808
SOURCES
SESS I ONS
COMPLETED
Ongoi ng
EVALUATION
(
-ft
1 n f a r rna t i o n
c o n s i d e r 0d
o f
va i u0
:i. n
1 0 r" flis
o f
t h 0
g r 0up 1
i
* y '•»
<
S
G
1 A
t h e
h qst aq 0s ,
t h 0 i r
1 o c: a t i a n
an d
t h e i r
p h ys i c a 1
st at us,
P r a j 0c t e d
d a 1 0 s
o *f
r e 1 eas0
h a ve
p r a ven
i ‘n e or r 0c
l:
.
P0 r i od
:L c
up d a t e s
w
:i. 1 1
c on t. i n u0
t
h 0
|j r dv i d 0d
..
)
SG1A
890
9902
8903
8904
8905
8VO 6
8907
(# Phase
II
of
thl s project
reopened
on
Ph ase
I
g t
t. h
.
p r 0 j ec l 7
..
8908
9 MAR 89
Phase
II
of
this project
reopened
on
27 June
1989.
QBE)
JAN 89
PENDING
3.9 JAN 89
PENDING
B
3.0 FEB 89
3.5 FEB 89
.}
j -
j
, APR 89
PEND I NG
23 MAY 89
PEND I NG
:0
30 MAR 89
#
reopened
on
5 June
‘'89;
Viewer
8V U 9
8909—20#
(ft
Targe
basis)
9 MAR 89
PEND 1 NG
ts selected
by
SR I"- Int I
..
8 i..unroa ri 0s
-fwded
on
a weekly
3. 0
3.
10 MAR 89
PEND I NG
893.3.
j.
9 MAR 89
PEND I NG
3. 3—A
3.
9 MAR 09
15 MAR
893.4
( *
89 3. 4
c an t i n u e d
.. R <
3c n own
ground
truth.)
esul ts
i
25 MAY
:::i i c a t e
3. a c k
a f
c o r
\
•ft
re I at i on
rt
Approved For Release 2000/0^/q8^fciArlDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: C1A-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
89 1
J UN
£39
1^ENDING
J 1.JN 89
(#
Viewer
079
' s resul ts
i n
seareh project were
sue.i:ess‘f u 1
)
8917
24 APR 89
PENDING
:!. 8
APR 89
PENDING
89:1.
25 APR 89
PEND I NG
BV20
20 JUN 89
PENDING
892
24 JUN 89
PEND I NG
8922
"7
3 AUG 89
PENDING
8923
7 JUL 89
PENDING
8924
:l. 4
< QBE
)
q
j-j
:!. 4
4 AUG 89
8 AUG 89
k-
into
on
1 3
h o s
tv. a g e <::>
a n d ETC
Hi g g
:i. n s
8926
1 6
20 SEP 89
PEND I NG
8927
18 SEP 89
PENDING
8928
4 GUT 89
PEND I NG
09:29
DEC 89
PEND I NG
8930
&
24 AUG
PEND I NG
8931
29 aug
PEND I NG
i-1 .-i .' ••••>
O
/
-..‘.i
ALJG/ 3 OCT
8Q
89,:'...:!.
AUG 89
PEND I NG
8934
AUG 89
PEND I NG
89 ..:!< 3
KT
i../
5 SEP 89
PEND I NG
B93
o
:l
3 OCT
PEND IMG
i")
-••
i
O 7
..... /
ngoi ng
8938
Pend i ng
8939
9 NOV 89
PENDING
Approved For Release 2000/08/68^
IDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08^ ^
JilfA'-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
VIEWER 003
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
22(277.)
34(427.)
25(317.)
OPS
102
5(137.)
19(497.)
25(387.)
TOTAL
183
130
27(20.87.)
53(40.77.)
50(38.5
TIMG RELIABILITY
697.
OPS RELIABILITY
627.
VIEWER Oil
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
128
128
4(37.)
63(497.)
61 (487.)
OPS
1 (57.)
10(567.)
7(397.)
TOTAL
223
146
5(3.47.)
73(507.)
68(46.67.)
TNG RELIABILITY
527.
OPS RELIABILITY
617.
VIEWER 018
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
7(87.)
50(587.)
29(337.)
OPS
2(117.)
7(417.)
8(477.)
TOTAL
179
103
9(87.)
57(557.)
37(357.)
TNG RELIABILITY
667.
OPS RELIABILITY
527.
sp"
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
is,
y
\ t L
F-
...
^
** /vriM m ^ V
Ju
Approved For Release 2000/087$$
;
-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
TNG
OPS
TOTAL
SESSIONS
EVAL
140
140
158
143
VIEWER 025
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
31(22%)
91(65%)
18(12.8%)
0/0
1(33%)
2(66%)
31(21.7%)
92(64.3%)
20(14%)
TNG RELIABILITY
87%
OPS RELIABILITY
33%
(TO BE ESTABLISHED)
VIEWER 032
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
17(17%)
65(69%)
11(11%)
OPS
0/0
0/0
2(100%)
TOTAL
17(18%)
65(68%)
13(14%)
TNG RELIABILITY
82%
OPS RELIABILITY
(TO BE ESTABLISHED)
VIEWER 079
\
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
104
104
8(8%)
63(61%)
33(31%)
OPS
170
6(24%)
8(32%)
11(44%)
TOTAL
274
129
14(11%)
71(55%)
44 (34%)
TNG RELIABILITY
69%
OPS RELIABILITY
56%
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
%;* V
r
$ tep k
i
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA^tjfe9i6-00789R001 800680001 -8
VIEWER 095
SESSIONS
EVAL
HIGH
VALUE
LOW
TNG
105
105
10 (9.5*/.)
63(60%)
32(30.5%)
OPS
0/0
5(62%)
3(32%)
TOTAL
162
113
10 (8.8%)
68 (60.2%)
35(31%)
TNG RELIABILITY 69.5%
OPS RELIABILITY
62%
t
t
Approved For Release 2000/0g/0^: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
i
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
•Approved For Release 200
BPS6-00789R001 80068Q001 -8
for
COORDINATE
. REMOTE > V 1 KMIMG
The Coordinate Remote Viewing
(CRV)
training procedure was
developed by an SRI- Jnternati onal
(SR I- I)
subcontractor
in the
early J980s to satisfy R&D demands on SRI-I
to enhance the
reliability
(scientific replicability)
of remote viewing
(RV)
.
The subcontractor's approach
to improving
the reliability of RV
was to focus
on
the control
o*f those factors that
in his view
tend to introduce
"noise”
into the RV product
(imaginative,
environmental,
and interviewer overlays!.
The basic components
of this training procedure consist
of
;
\
(1)
Repeated site-address
(coordinate)
presen tat i on ,
with
quick-reaction response by the remote
viewer;
coupled with
a
restrictive format for reporting perceived information
(to
minimize imaginative overlays)
.
i
(2)
The use of
a special ly-designed,
acoustic-tiled,
relatively featureless,
homogeneously-colored
"viewing
chamber "
(to minimize environmental
overlays).
•
!
.
.
j
(3)
The adoption of a strictly-pVescribed,
limited
'
int^rviever patter
(to minimize
interviewer overlays)*
x;
The applied CRV training procedure requires that the trainee
learn
a progressive multi-stage acquisition process postulated to
correspond to increased contact with the site*
Initially the
trainee
is presented with RV sites requiring minimal detection
«*nd decoding skills
( ’’stage
one** sites).
When the trainee
demonstrates
an ability to control
the
"signal
line" and reliably
"objectif ies” aepurate descriptions,
the
next
"stage"
of training
is engaged.
This procedure continues through
"stage
six'*
and
usually takes
a number
of months to master.
The CRV Stages
are
identified as
follows:
Stage One
—
islands,
mountains,
deserts
,
etc.
Stage Two
—
o
Stage Three
—
sites of quality se
are uniquely descri
taste,
sound,
color
glaciers,
volcanoes
sites possessing
s
character i sties
suc[
airfields,
etc*
nsory value ;
sites which
bable through
touch,
or odor such as
industrial
plants,
etc.
gnif icant dimensional
h as
bui 1 d ings,
bridges,
Appendix
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
ermrr
Approved For Release 2000/0^i8^^rl|DP96-90789R001 800680001 -8
*
.
,;;i ;,go
Four
*-
sitc.s
i 'eq’u i r i ng qualitative
mcnl;il
j><. i
pi . *i
such ns technical
i<ron,
mi
] itflry feeling,
rc^cnrch,
etc.
Singe Five
—
.sites requiring
the interrogation
of
qualitative mental
percepts
to produce
refined information such as aircraft tracking
radar,
biomedical
research facility,
tank
production
plant,
etc.
•Stage Six
sites requiring direct,
three-dimensional
assessment of site elements
to one another
such as airplanes
inside one of three
camouf 1 aged hangars or
a military compound
with
a command building,
barracks,
motor
pool
,
and underground weapons storage area.
As Stage Six
is engaged,
an assessment of
relative temporal
and spatial
dimensional
elements along with further qualitative
elements evolve
into the consci ousness of the
t r a i nee.
There are three classes
of CRV training.
These classes
deal
with
feedback requirements during
the CRV session,
control
of!
interviewer patter,
trainee
skill
development,
and motivation.
\ These three classes
(A,
B,
and
C)
are discussed below but differ
somewhat from the definition applied and published by SRI-I for
Class
A,
By. and C CRV training.
CLASS
C:
When
a trainee begins
a
“stage" of training the
sessions
are
of
the Class
C
type.
During this
phase,
the
trainee must
learn
to differentiate between emerging site
relevant perceptions and imaginative overlay.
To assist
the
trainee
in
this
learning,
i mmedi ate feedback
is provided
during
tl^e session.
The
interviewer
(monitor)
is provided
with
a feedback package which may contain
a
map,
photographs
,
and/or narrative description
of
the
site.
During Class
C sessions
the interviewer provides
the trainee
with immediate feedback for each element
of data he
provides,
with
the exception
that negative feedback
is
not
given.
Should the trainee state
an element
of
information
that appears
incorrect,
the interviewer remains
silent.
Feedback
,
in order
to prevent
inadvertent cuing
(interviever
overlay),
is
in the form of very specific statements made by
the
interviewer.
These statements and their definitions are
as follows:
!
•
Correct
(C)
— This indicates that the information
is
j
correct
in context with
the site
location,
but
is not
sufficient
to end the session.
j
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
'
. emTY
Approved For Release 2000/08/0^v Ci1aJrIp96-00789R001 800680001 -8
rrolvil.Jy Cortot. t
(1*0
- This
st/itcmMit
Ui:.t Aha
iiitoiviowt-r,
having limited
i nformntion about
the
'-ito,
though
ho cannot be absolutely cur o,
believes
that
i lie
information provided
is correct.
Hear
(N)
- This indicates that the
information
provi tied
is not
an element of the specific site,
hut
is correct
for
the
immediate surrounding area.
*’
*
Can't Feedback
(CFB)
— This statement
indicates that,
due
to
limited information about the site,
the
interviewer cannot make
a judgement as to the
correctness of the data.
It means neither correct nor
incorrect*
Site
<S>
- This
indicates the site has been correctly
identified for
the specific stage being trained
(manmade structure for Stage One,
bridge for Stage
Three,
etc.).
’’Site” indicates that the session
is
completed.
CLASS
B:
Once
a trainee begins to demonstrate his ability
to reliably distinguish imaginative overlay and report site
relevant data elements,
feedback
is withdrawn.
^
In Class
B
training sessions the interviewer knows what site he desires
the trainee
to describe but does not provide the trainee
with any direct feedback during the course of the session.
This process develops the trainee's ability to internalize
his awareness of relevant
(correct)
versus extraneous
(incorrect)
cognitive structures
(mental
perceptions).
During Class
B sessions the
interviewer ‘(monitor)
may direct
the trainee
to elaborate on specific elements of data
provided,
thereby guiding the trainee to describe specific
areas
of
the
site.
The interviewer
is only permitted to
direct
the trainee to elaborate on specific elements already
reported
*by the
trainee.
The interviewer may not introduce
new elements
into the session
(cue
the trainee)
in
an
attempt
to encourage the trainee to properly describe
the^
site.
Class
B sessions
are especially helpful
in developing
refined skills
in the trainee.
For example,
when the
interviewer knows that
a particular site area within a site
may be
of interest
(i.e.,
a speci f ic room
l n
a building),
he
can guide the trainee's attention to that area by directing
the trainee
to elaborate on
specifi^c elements of data which
the
interview’er knows to pertain
to the area of
interest.
With practice
in Class
B,
the trainee soon
learns to control
his own perceptual
faculties and develops confidence
in his
ability.
I
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
* o-rrmrv
\
•
i
\
J
i*.
Approved For Rejease 2000/0^/bsf-: 6lW-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
CLASS
As
CYor.tz
A training
is
.-limMar
to vhat
llio
Kf:0
. communi ty rffors
to ns
a Vdoublo blind*
<.xpcri jnrnl.
Tlio
pur posses Tor Class
A
tral ni ng and for RRD double blind
oxpcri mentis differ however.
The
liffcD community u^ds^oiiblo
hi i nd experimental protocol s
to last a
va r i aW c,/u nder J <
controlled conditions.
Class
A training 'is not
a
test
for
the trainee,
but
a process whereby the trainee learns
to
function with
the
interviewer
in
a team effort
to acquire
and describe
information concerning
a site on
interest*
In
*>Class
A the
interviewer
is provided very little or no
information concerning
the site and the trainee
is provided
no feedback during
the^ session.
The trainee
is motivated to
work with the
interviewer
in producing valid information
about the site
of
interest.
This motivational difference
is
critical
in forcing
the trainee
to use his RV ability to
acquire and describe site dependent information as opposed
to interviewer dependent
(telepathic?)
information.
Working
as
a team
in
a Class
A session,
the interviewer
(monitor)
and trainee combine their aptitudes
(the interviewer with
his directive,
analytic skill
and the trainee with his
exploratory,
perceptual
ability)
to report information
of
interest about
the designated
site.
As
a result
of the technology transfer from the SRI—
subcontractor to this office the CRV training procedure
is fully
documented
in booklet
jform.
Copies of
this* booklet are
maintained by this office and are available to those with
a
verified need-to -know.
Of speciaL note
is the fact that this
booklet
is governed by corporate
laws of propriety and as such
may not be reproduced or disseminated without permission.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R001 800680001 -8
emir?