datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 “SE CRE 10 7829R002200470001-6 10. 11. 12. 13, 14. 15. REFERENCES (U) Zimbardo, P., Psychology and Life, 12th Ed., Scott, Foresman and Company, Boston, MA, p. 54 (1988) UNCLASSIFIED. Rosenthal, R., Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 6, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA (1982) UNCLASSIFIED. Light, R. J. and D. B. Pillemer, Summing Up, The Science of Reviewing Research, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1984) UNCLASSIFIED. Hedges, L. V. and I. Olkin, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY (1985) UNCLASSIFIED. Feingold, A., “Matching for Attractiveness in Romantic Partners and Same-Sex Friends: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Critique,” Psych. Bull., Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 226-235 (1988) UNCLASSIFIED. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (rev. ed.) Academic Press, New York, NY (1977) UNCLASSIFIED. Targ, E., R. Targ, and O. Lichtarge, “Realtime Clairvoyance: A Study of Remote Viewing Without Feedback,” The Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association 28th Annual Convention, Tufts University, Medford, MA, pp. 335-342 (August 1985) UNCLASSIFIED. Honorton, C., D. B. Ferrari, and G. Hansen, “Meta-Analysis of Forced—Choice Precognition Experiments,” Psychophysical Research Laboratories’ Technical Report (1989) UNCLASSIFIED. May, E. C., R. Targ, and H. E. Puthoff, “Possible EEG Correlates to Remote Stimuli Under Conditions of Sensory Shielding,” Proceedings of Electro77 Professional Program of the IEEE, Special Session on the State of the Art in Psychic Research, New York (April 1977) UNCLASSIFIED. May, E. C., W. W. Luke, and T. J. Frivold, “Neurophysiological Correlates to Remote Viewing (U),” SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, Final Report—Objective D, Task 1, Project 1291 (December 1988) SECRET. Private communication. Kogan, I. M., “Is Telepathy Possible?” Radio Eng., Vol. 21, P. 75 (January 1966) UNCLASSIFIED. Puthoff, H. E, and R. Targ, “A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 329-354 (March 1976) UNCLASSIFIED. May, E. C., D. I. Radin, G. S. Hubbard, B. S. Humphrey, and J. M. Utts, “PSI Experiments with Random Number Generators: An Informational Model,” SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, Final Report Project 8067 (October 1985) UNCLASSIFIED. Honorton, C., “Error Some Place!l,” Journal of Communication, pp. 103-116 (Winter 1975) UNCLASSIFIED. 24 SECRET Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/de)GN GLASS) FRED 2200470001-6 Appendix CODING SHEETS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE META-ANALYSIS (This Appendix is UNCLASSIFIED) 25 UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/bd/ hq CL Ar§ $l t4B)02200470001-6 Page: Unit Information Coder 1. Form |.D; | Data Session Viewer Viewer within Condition Trial Experiment O: ILD. Experienced Novice Viewer Location non: Parameters That Ditier| Circte or write in all appropriate conditions Beacon Abstract Coordinates Prompting Self Unknown to Ops Real Site Photograph Alpha/Numeric Person Objects 0: N <1 <50 <$5000 >5000 Unknown  O: N | Target Location | Inside Outside Both O: Target: When Selected | Retrocognition Real Time Precognition Shielding Type Unknown E&M Cage/Room Water SCIF oO: Feedback Type None Visual Audio Verbal Intermediate Site Unknown O: Feedback: When Immediate <S min = <1 hr <1 day >1 day Unknown Independent Variable #1 Condition: Independent Variable #2 Condition: # of Trials Judgement Score Effect Size Comments: UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002600320005-4
^/Jy
C
oLx.. [\ w
^
£ c\r\JL^
C
cp Aj? ci* Q
^
O j^
n
y
^
C^2i
/loCtc^J)
)
'ctp/eJuU
'ftO^ltrv'
fV^cJ"
7^~
CJ2^Ca_p
-/cu^
pJL£ CJU-«_Pc/
r\/M
(Ol^is\^t
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002600320005-4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07{: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9 WeepeR ConctRucTING® A WALL Approved For Release 2000/08)07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9
I
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9
Approved For Release 2000/0^^^^^|^^^6R000600610001-9
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING
(RV)
SESSION DCC-63
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Prior to the session the remote viewer was given
a sealed
envelope containing the coordinate
of the target area.
At no time during
the session was the envelope opened.
No other data was provided to the
remote viewer.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
During the session,
the control room monitor
(in-house pro-
ject analyst)
who had knowledge
of the target area and maps of the target
area,
intermittently directed the interviewer
to ask the remote viewer
to
elaborate on portions of the remote viewer's descriptions of the target area.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000
(
8R000600610001-9
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9
)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600610001-9
| . . ce . \ He I = a Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700470006-5 NV VM b, ety S 1171771649 Vi I2~2q 74? 763 mn ish Md A ti AB at ND eimai | L 72 97t 217 bh j2176 BIA | | | | | | | | Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700470006-5
oe {etna PROJECT EVALUATION FORM] FITS ["saeoF | APRPRDRERPORRTeasp 2600/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000600620001-8 1. CUSTOMER OFFICE 2, INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE C-620 3, TARGET COUNTRIES 4. PROJECT NUMBER 5, SOURCE NUMBER 8113 DCC-58 0031 NUMBER REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT See Item #15 8, REFERENCES 6. REASON FOR EVALUAT ION (select. one “SAL ICR RESPONSE MB. COLLECTORS REQUEST =" . - - EB. CL SELECTED BY ANALYST. 5 =, Sem. oR REQUIREMENTS (CITE 2m (TER/CIR/DIRM3/DIRM 9) 2 on co (cB INITIATIVE: REPORT 3250: ll. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT “VALUE-OF INFORMATION (select one) o Concrete es - FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION: T° A. OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE » PA=B. OF VALUE © oe: YY Cc. OF NO VALUE A, BASIC INTELLIGENCE B. CURRENT INTELLIGENCE C. ESTIMATIVE INTELLIGENCE D. S&T INTELLIGENCE goog00g ~- OF NO VALUE 13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION REASON INFORMATION IS os (select one only) (select one only). A. COMPLETELY SATISFIED B. PARTIALLY SATISFIED C. NOT SATISFIED AT ALL A. TOO FRAGMENTARY B. DUPLICATIVE C. UNTIMELY ~D. NOT RESPONSIVE TO TASKING CITED coda goo 14. NAME OF PRODUCT(S) a SG1A 15. COLLECTION GUIDANCE (Mandatory unless 13A, above, is checked ) (co The sdordinates for this target Hs wiere not included anywhere in your.’ ture reports should identify the specific target on which source is reporting. - ‘ous reports. for-target 8113 concerned. a different set of coordinates. Récomméeng each target receivé a separate target humber, or at a minimum remarks within each report. contain specific target coordinates. re , : 16. REMARKS (Optional) (U) As indicated in item 12, the information in this report was of no value to our production effort. We expected ice and snow in the area, but doubt much tundra or melted lakes exist in the area where observed by source. CLASSIFIED BY CDR, ITAC _salenleing | DECLASSIFY_17_ JUNE 1987 ep aaa! | Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-007%88RO00@ oa che
ee RSleasd 2000/08/07 ¥ (nemar s con inued EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATION (select one only) RELEASABLE EVALUATION NOT REQUESTED EVALUATION | 5 NOT RELEASABLE PARA(S) -, ABOVE, IS/ARE RELEASABLE TO THE GOVT(S) OF 18. EVALUATOR'S NAME JIMMY WEBSTER SYMBOL MAJ, MI TAX-O- SR/SRD/TTAC 21. DATE EVALUATED rT. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000600620001-8 . FOREIGN DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY DECISION (select one only) EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASABLE NON-CAVEATED PORTIONS OF THIS EVAL, AS | INDICATED, MAY BE REL TO THE AUTH REPS 7 OF THE GOVT(S) OF AT THE DISCRETION: OF THE ORTOTNATOR. 19. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE | 20. SECURITY ee —_ (DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION, AND SPECIAL MARKINGS) ho7ssRoococoaeree SECURLTY CLAS
i FINAL PROJECT EVALUATION FORM|f
o*
b8/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600620001 -8
2".
INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE
MONTH
J
DAY
3.
TARGET COUNTRIES
6. NUM0ERREPORTS SUOMI II LU"
FOR PROJECT
See Item #15
'
,
14.
PROJECT NUMBER
5.
SOURCE NUMBER
DCC-58
7.
REPORT
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
See
Item
3-5
8.
REFERENCES
'
'v /r.v V'Yi
'»'•
v’
-
‘
A.' REQUIREMENTS
(CITE)
•
' GF
(ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9)
:
f
B..INITIATIVE REPORT feivOT
10.
VALUE OF
INFORMATION (select one)
n
A.
OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE
O
B. OF VALUE
&
C. OF NO VALUE
12.
REASON INFORMATION
IS OF
NO VALUE
• (select one only)
E3
A.
TOO FRAGMENTARY
a
B. DUPLICATIVE
C. UNTIMELY
Q
D.
NOT RESPONSIVE TO
TASKING CITED
14.
NAME OF PRODUCT (S)
>. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one
A.
ICR RESPONSE
W
B.
COLLECTORS REQUEST
C.
SELECTED BY ANALYST
11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT
FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION
a
A.
BASIC INTELLIGENCE
B.
CURRENT
INTELLIGENCE
C. ESTIMATIVE
INTELLIGENCE
O
D.
S&T INTELLIGENCE
"13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION
(select one only)
a
A. COMPLETELY SATISFIED
£3
B.
PARTIALLY SATISFIED
®
C.
NOT SATISFIED AT ALL
SG1A
COLLECTION GUIDANCE
(Mandatory unless
13A,
above,
is checked)
(C)*
The -Coordinates
for this target
were not included anywhere
in your
report
Future reports should identify
the
specific target
on which source
is
reporting.
Also, -previous reports for target
8113
concerned
a different
set of coordinates.
Re comment each target receive
a separate
target number,
or at a minimum remarks within eac
report contain specific target coordinates .-
16.
REMARKS
(Optional)
(Til
As indicated in item
12,
the information
in this report was
of no value
to our
production effort.
We expected ice and snow in the
area,
but doubt much tundra
or
melted lakes
exist
in the area where observed by source.
CLASSIFIED BY CDR ,
ITAC
DECLASSIFY
17 JUNE
1987
I
Approved For Release 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R00(
GFCI !R I T Y CLASSIFICATION
Uremarks continue^onto
ia For Releas
easi 2000/08/07
: CIA-RDP96-00788R000600620001-8
A. EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATION
(select one only)
T
m
RELEASABLE EVALUATION NOT REQUESTED
n
EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASABLE
n
PARA/S)
ABOVE,
IS/ARE
U
RELEASABLE TO THE GOVT(S) OF
—
B. FOREIGN DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY DECISION
(select one only)
n
EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASABLE
rt
NON-CAVE ATED PORTIONS OF THIS EVAt,
AS
.
INDICATED, MAY BE REL TO THE AUTH REPS
OF THE GOVT (S)
OF
—:
AT
THE DISCRETION OF THE ORIGINATOR,
18. EVALUATOR'S NAME
JIMMY WEBSTER
.
MAJ,
MI
21. DATE EVALUATED
YEAR
I
MONTH
1981
DAY
19. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE
SYMBOL
IAX-0-SR/SRD/ITAC
22T0RIg I NA T Otr OF"TOT^rT0R
' INF ORMAT iOTT
20.
SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS
.
(DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION,
AND SPECIAL MARKINGS)
23.
(Signature of evaluator)
4. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF. INFORMATION: Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002400920001 -4 TASKING SHEET — SOURCE NO: A) -< S poem ent SUSPENSE: 42 FEB 93” __1200 Hrs_ 1. PROJECT NUMBER: 2. METHOD/TECHNIQUE:__ Method of choice. 3. BACKGROUND: This is a continuation of a series known’ as the "communication proficiency project" devised for use by a potential customer. It involves the selection of one of the appropriate squares reflected on the attached 4x4 matrix. -~---The series involves the use of a beacon will randomly select a square and mark it with a large "X". ~---Initiall no specific message. willbe associated with the selection. At a later date, this approach will be adapted for. actual message transmission(from a potential prisoner, hostage etc.) eee ~---Using ithe attached unmarked matrix, please "select" and mark the proper target square. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CH4-REP96-00789R002400920001-4
Approved For Release 2000knb iN ChA SSA FEB 02200470001-6 . ; ; ’ Page: | Publication Information | Coder |.D: _ Form |.D: Final Mid-year Interim Quarterly Progress Monthly Progress oO: Rules for Meta-analysis Coding Use one Publication Information sheet for each publication. Use as few Experiment Information sheets as necessary. A Unit is the smallest level at which the most basic hypothesis (usually psi versus no psi) was tested. Results for a hypothesis that cannot be reconstructed from the basic units should be coded as a separate “experiment”. The Type should be listed as O: correlation. For an experiment, staple together all Unit Information sheets with the Experiment Information sheet on top. Clip together all experiment packets from the same publication. Number all of the sheets consecu- tively within a publication. Circle (or slash) the appropriate choice. Use [ ] around data to indicate a coder guess or calculation. Hf Other (O:) then specify. 1. Use publication date if Experiment date is unknown. 2. Generally, independent variables are those manipulated by the experimenter. However, this space can also be used for variables that differ unintentionally within an experiment. See Rule #4 under “Unit In- formation”. 3. Example: LANL experiment is coded as follows: Experiment Type: RV-Lab: Principal Hypothesis: CNS responds to remote, external stimuli; Independent Variable: Timing of remote stimuli. 4. Targeting Method: Prompting means a sound or gesture (e.g., Gina's bell). 5. Shielding is for viewer, target, or both. 6. Most feedback is actually multi-mode. Code the primary mode. Visual] Feedback: Photograph (e.g., National Geographic Magazine). Audio Feedback: Just a sound (e.g., Bell from the teaching ma- chine). Verbal Feedback: Verbal debrief (e.g., You did well. The target was ...). Site Feedback: Physical visit to the target site (e.g., Outbound experiment). Basic Analvsis: 1. Rank R = number of choices for ranking, including targei and all decoys. 2. Analysis scale, n = maximum. (e.g., 0 -> 4, n = 4). 3. Judgment means a qualitative estimate (e.g., by-gosh-by-golly); 1 = complete miss, 4 = complete hit. 4. Statistic means z-score or F ratio, etc. 1. Unit Name is “Session” for a single RV session, but “Trial” for a single forced choice. In forced choice experiments, there are usually several trials in a single session. 2. Unit I.D. is blank most of the time. Use Ops tag when appropriate. 3. Viewer I.D. is according to our most current list. Therefore, if a known viewer was listed under an old 1.D., note the person's name so the current 1.D. can be entered in the data base. 4. Parameters that differ should be filled in only for those cases where “differs” was circled on the Experi- ment Sheet. If the variable was intentionally manipulated, circle Y. 5. P-value should be entered as ~-1 if it is unknown, to avoid confusion with the default missing value code of 0, which could be a legitimate P-value. UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/08(0B NOG IRfe $ $d fe} Bc) 200470001-6 Page: Coder |.D: Date: Form 1.D: Forced-Choice Screening Training Search O: Pages Within Document Principal Investigator Number of Subjects Principal Hypothesis Independent Variable(s) not included below; list categories or describe in space provided. Experiment Task Known Target Parameters | Target Name Targeting Method Type Ops Real Site Photograph Alpha/Numeric Person Objects Differs* O: Distance (km) | <1 <50 <5000 > 5000 Unknown Differs* 0: Beacon Abstract Coordinates Prompting Self Unknown Differs* 0: Location Inside Outside Both Differs" O: When Selected Retrocognition Real Time Precognition Differs* Oo: Shielding Type Unknown E&M Cage/Room Water SCIF Differs*  O: Site Unknown Differs* O: <1 day >1 day Unknown Differs* 9° Blind Post Hoc # of choices Depndt. Variable Rating Rank R__ Fuzzy Bit Diser. Bit Concept Hits_._ Scale n Judgment Match O: FM : Method Scott's #rows Sum-of-Ranks Statistic oO: By Whom Psu Olen Purpose PK Utility Demonstration O: * When “Differs” is circled, information must be entered at the unit level. UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDF.96,00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1 V ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Cognitive Sciences Program staff appreciate the warm welcome provided by the staff of the Neuromagnetism Laboratory at LANL. In particular, we thank Dr. M. Oakley for assisting us with data collection and suggesting the phase model. Without the help of Dr. E. Flynn, the experiment could not have been conducted, and we thank Dr. C. Wood for providing promising directions for future research. 30 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1 + YW NY 10. 11. REFERENCES Dean, E. D., International Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 2, p 439, 1966. Tart, C. T., International Journal of Parapsychology, Vol. 5, p 375, 1963. Duane, T. D., and Behrendt, T., Science, Vol. 150, p. 367, 1965. Cavanna, R., Ed., Psi Favorable States of Consciousness, Parapsychology Foundation, New York, 1970. Rebert, C. S., and Turner, A., “EEG Spectrum Analysis Techniques Applied to the Problem of Psi Phenomena,” Physician’s Drug Manual, Vol. 6, Nos. 1-8, pp 82-88, 1974. Targ, R., May, E. C., Puthoff, H. E., Galin, D., and Ornstein, R., “Sensing of Remote EM Sources (Physiological Correlates),” Final Report, Project 4540, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1977. Sutherling, W. W., Crandall, P. H., Cahan, L. D., and Barth, D. S., “The Magnetic Field of Epileptic Spikes Agrees with Intracranial Localizations in Complex Partial Epilepsy,” Neurology, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp 778-786, May 1988. Aine, C. J., George, J. $., Medvick, P. A., Oakley, M. T., and Flynn, E. R., “Source Localization of Components of the Visual-Evoked Neuromagnetic Response,” Neuromagnetism Laboratory, Life Sciences and Physics Divisions, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (rev. ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1977. Eason, R. G., Oden, D., White, B. A., and White, C. T., “Visually Evoked Cortical Potentials and Reaction Time in Relation to Site of Retinal Stimulation,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 22, pp 313-324, 1967. Rice, J. A., Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, p 143, 1988. 31 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200600001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003300210005-8 SIGNIT/9S/iN/} Aripuruins ABolopoyjeW suotjpi1edoO. sjoBipy, Jo sed Ay SHUINSD] JO seToBbepD SOTDO[OpPOUJS|, AIDPU0dSsS seIHolopoyjeW AIDUITIg s}ljJoueg UOMDAIOIIDg [SUUOSIOg JUSUISHDUDY. SuUOTIIUTJOd  -WOTSST esoding MIIATIAO Approved For.Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003300210005-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 5001 40005-7
USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3
24 February 1984
will
be
jinade
and
adequate
facilities
provided
to
protect
the
subject
and
in-
vestigators
against
all
foreseeable
injuries,
disabilities,
or
death.
A pro-
ject
wil^. not
be conducted
if any reason exists
to believe
that death or injury
will result.
The degree
of potential
risk will never exceed
the expected bene-
fits
of
the
project.
Qualifications
of
Investigators .
Only
persons
judged
qualified
by
the
appropriate approving authority will conduct human subject studies.
The physi-
cian
responsible
for
the
health
and welfare
of
the
subject
may
or may
not
be
the principal investigator.
The physician
is
authorized
to stop
the project at
any
time he
or
she believes
that
injury, disability or death may result.
nors.
i
Minors may
not
be
involved
as
human
research
subjects without
3-13.
advance approval
in each case
by the INSC0M HTRB
.
3-14.
Recruiting
of
volunteers .
Volunteer
recuiting will
be
accomplished
by
personnel^
responsible
for
the
conduct
of
the
particular
project,
or
as
other-
wise specifically approved by
the INSCOM HTRB.
3-15.
Pijotocol guidance .
a.
Each
approved
protocol will
be
reviewed
at
least
annually
and
on
a
continuing
basis
as
determined
by
the
INSCOM
HTRB.
Annually means
once
each
12-month period.
h*
The
decision
as
to
whether
a
research
protocol
involves
more
than
minimal risk shall
be made by
the INSCOM HTRB.
c.
The
research
protocol
will
be
prepared
in
accordance
with
the
in-
structions
contained
at appendix B.
3-2
Approi/ed For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 5001 40005-7
SG1A Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000600630001-7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000600630001-7
Release 2000/08/08QgS0pjgep)O789ROO22OO47OOO1 -6
Final Report—Task
6.0.1
March 1989
Covering the Period
1 October 1988 to 15 February 1989
REVIEW
OF
THE
PSYCHOENERGETIC
RESEARCH
CONDUCTED AT SRI INTERNATIONAL (1973-1988)
(U)
Thane J
.
Frivold
Beverly S. Humphrey
Prepared for:
CONTRACTING OFFICER’S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE
SRI Project 1291
By:
Edwin C. May
Jessica M. Utts
Virginia V. Trask
Wanda W. Luke
t
WARNING NOTICE
RESTRICTED DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS
to the^^^Hproject
SG1A
NOT RELEASABLE TO
FOREIGN NATIONALS
333 Ravenswood
CA 94025
Release 2^0^68?08 !^fA-MB$96-0078*9R0^
SBlMmnitictp.iiti
Telex: 334-486
v.a
.. .1291
mi vim
pages
•
I
For Release 2000/08/08 gfq0|{fgpO789ROO22OO47OOO1-6
Final Report—Task
6.0,1
March 1969
Covering the Period
1 October 1966 to 15 February 1969
REVIEW
OF
THE
PSYCHOENERGETIC
RESEARCH
CONDUCTED AT SRI INTERNATIONAL (1973-1988)
(U)
By:
Edwin C. May
Virginia V. Trask
Thane J.
Frivold
Jessica M. Utts
Wanda W. Luke
Beverly S. Humphrey
Prepared for:
SGI J
CONTRACTING OFFICER’S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE
SRI Project 1291
I
J
WARNING NOTICE
RESTRICTED DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS
TO THE^^^^^^I PROJECT
Approved by:
Copy 3 _ ofIS Copies
MURRAY J, BARON, Director
This document consists of 24 pages
Geoscience and Engineering Center
SRI/GF-0320
CLASSIFIED BY:
HQ, USAMRDC (SGRD-ZA)
DECLASSIFY ON: OADR
NOT RELEASABLE TO
FOREIGN NATIONALS
SG1A
,
333 Ravenswood Av§£l^r^
CA 94025
id For Rele^l
Approved For Release 200q/08^|^^^»-t0rpiW^00470001-6
(U)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
I
OBJECTIVE
II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
III
INTRODUCTION
IV
METHOD OF APPROACH
A.
Analysis Domain
B.
Database Management System
C.
Statistical Methods
V
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A.
Overall Results
B.
Results for Categories Within the Informational Process
C.
Specific Results for Remote Viewing
REFERENCES
.
iv
. v
.
. 2
.
. 4
. 4
.
. 7
ili
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/0£UENlEiEASSH«tE©200470001-6
(U)
LIST OF TABLES
Definitions And Meta-analysis Formalism (U)
Statistical Results For Major Classes (U)
Statistical Results For Informational Categories (U)
iv
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release 2000/y(H|:(cfeASSiH44ifc2200470001 -6
(U)
LIST OF FIGURES
1.
Categories And Number Of Trials (U)
Database Schema Design For Meta-analysis (U)
v
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002200470001-6
Approved For Release
ISMU ™nnnnr nny^pnnisnniTnnnA.s
SECRET
WORKING PAPERS
SGF0IA2
As
it appears in SOW (U)
6.1.3.
(S/NF)
Determine
if select physiologica l parameters
can be useful
for
identifying or predicting occurrence of psychoenergetic
phenomena
Expansion (U)
(S/NF) Description:
Determine the degree
to which magnetic
visual evoked potentials can be observed under psychoenergetic conditions.
(S/NF)
Subcontractor:
SRI /Los Alamos National
laboratory.
(S/NF) Deliverables:
4th quarter FY 1989,
a report detailing
the techniques and results of the experiment.
(S/NF)
If the FY 1988 task at Los Alamos
is not
successful,
this
are* will not be pursued
in FY 1989.
A substitute task will be
developed.
As
it appears in SOW (U)
O
6.1.4.
(S/NF)
Perform various
investigations that assist
in
identifying fundamental aspects
of the phenomena.
Expansion (U)
(S/NF)
This task will be
included only
if Task 6.1.3.
is
deleted.
A separate memo will be prepared at
that time
to specify what
is
required.
SGFOIA2
6.2.
(S/NF)
Applications research
As
it appears in SOW (U)
6.2.1.
(S/NF)
Develop quantification and evaluation
techniques for a variety of operational types of targets.
Approved For Release 2001 /6SCE7RECIA-RDP96-b0788R001 5001 70004-5
WORKING PAPERS