Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
LN465-92
needed
to
be sensitive and good
at observation-
Wcrs
*
this with
a predisposed
mind ,
which
would
infiiiffo
destroy
the
possibility of
the phenomena we hopdioi®
to use appropriate insight
and observation
to ie^
(£
which would give full consideration
to interpersnaix
to conduct effective scientific
research.
When people observe phenomena,
one of
the
iirfdiJ
**
is that
telekinesis phenomena
normally only
ocaa^
placed
in
a relaxed
state.
The nervousness,
te£ bv
state
of
some subjects was generally
transmitted
i
11:
all
of
the participants were very active and
triad
otr
overall
process
developed very
smoothly.
In adc t fi:
shapes
were
artistic
and
very
imaginative,
its
parapsychol og ica 1
abilities
and
everything “‘era c **
easily.
We also discovered
that
in general
,
it was *e£TT;.
a
batch of
phenomena on
precognition.
Although it
i
b):
what happened often was startling
and
surprising.,
'B
the high
degree of
concentration
in
order
to
tbtiri
(for example:
bending
a piece of metal),
but
thft
to.-
resulted
in
the destruction
of
the relaxed
mental
phenomenon.
It may
be believed
to actually
be pr
I
function
of
the brain.
However,
when we
mad*
e ta
;
what we wanted
to do,
the conscious functions of thi
of
a
hindrance than
a help
as far as our
objertiie
times we actually discovered
that
it
was
helpful
II
about things
which were
not closely related
towt sb,
This would cause
a reduction
in
the tendency
ta od
predetermined
goal
of
the
experiment.
This
d
in
process when going
to
sleep,
this
process
reyuab
continuous effort
.
Many
of
the
circumstances
described
alShr&It*
possible without the
successful
research
within n
«
Therefore,
if
the persons who were
to take part i^rlq
were nervous or unwilling and
did
not really
wmt>b
then
the
chance
of
success
would
be
greatly-
bn.
infectiousness
of
the beauty
of
the
test appamiuo
interest
and
enthusiasm,
while
a
constant
few
attitude and finally destroy
the
entire
operail
I
telekinesis,
the
conditions
described
above
important
than
in natural
science,
because
the
er
phenomena are not instruments or machines.
Any
di of
an
instrument or
a machine will undoubtedly
lead
hand,
as we have stated earlier,
they need
to
be v as
testing group,
to actively
participate
in
the
am
treated
as outsiders
i
ot want
to handle
our perception and
itody -
We attempted
a type
of method
it
ors and permit us
lems which occurs
ih
i
the subject
is
id
forced spiritual
the others.
When
d
a
good
job,
the
in
when
the testing
if* cted
those
with
o develop much more
Icult
to generate
d
de done at times,
hf ve
already noted
the desired results
concentration also
e required
for this
ily
an unconscious
i&d determination
of
ai n was
often more
were concerned-
At
alk
about or think
a*s about
to happen.
incentrate on
the
t
similar
to the
f
: termination ,
but
u
not
have been
natural
sciences,
lysics experiment
«
the experiment,
ad
Similarly,
the
wt
Id
help maintain
jdu 1 d weaken
this
n
the
study of
,
>a r 1 y
muc h
more
>«•••
producing
these
i
turn
a man
into
lure.
On
the other
a
a member of
the
nt,
and
not
be
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
LN465-97
The
following
analogy
may
be
helpful
in providing a more •tj^dized
overall description
of
phenomena
in
this
fiel
.
a
^
^on wants his
person who
is paralyzed because °*
to grow
new nerve
hands to regain their functions,
he must find 5D™e
y
He tries his best
channels.
How should
he do
this?
He does not know.
He tries
hl
J
e
tQ
and makes clear just
what
the
possibilities
o
can
not
concentrate and
carefully observe
just what movement oc^ ^
mQVe _
In
describe or
even imagine
what
he
is doing
to m
which results
addition,
he cannot produce any^°nt
^
clear that
it
is a random
in
a consciously predicted
result.
It
1f^aX^1““^d inQ
to
a connection
and
chance
unconscious
function
of
the
brain
le
Q
interest and
^r-ser^e^^ll^ofteT d^er
^at^i/moments are ^toward
approaching
his preset goals.
However,
it
move his hand or
if
people
around him believe
it
is impossi
..
it
is not
there are antagonistic
feelings
-high make
him nervous, ^ "
tc "°o
“^
likely
that he
will
be
able to continue the necessary interest and
activity
to move his hands-
People
working
with
this
type
of
paralyzed
person
(juch
as
a
therapist)
obviously
cannot oppose
the view that
"he ^2Workers
are two
The view of
the paralyzed person and
the
view of
his
c
...
..
major factors
leading
to success.
The persons concerned must admit to the
possibility of
the maximum success,
and at the same time, continue to
te
for the
recovery of
health,
and
not restrict
it to certain results over
certain periods of
time.
although
the methods
can still
traditional methods
used
in
natural
sciences,
reliable results can still
be achieved
in
therapy.
The similarity between
this and research
into
In^to
obvious.
The major difference between
them
is:
We can
i
.
d
some degree explain
the
connection
between
the
hand
of
r^sent day
person and
his brain
(connected
by
nerves).
However,
with Present ^
scientific
knowledge,
we
are
unable
to
illustrate
or
connection between
the brain
and
the object moved or
bent.
H
forces
imagine that at the present time there are several
unknown binding forces,
binding
energy
or
binding
method,
then we could alsos^^t^thi force
telekinesis is effected
by using some
kind of
force simil
minht
of moving
the hand.
Then
there would
be those who believe there might
exist some type of unconscious "grouping"
connection.
In many situations,
there exist
a type
of visible
feedback which
can allow
a pers
aware of what he^s doing.
Furthermore,
this
feedback
allows
him to
strive to
continue along
that same
route which
cannot
be described and
cannot
be determined.
However,
it is possible that there
±
th
of
feedback
which exist.
If
a piece of metal
can cause * ^actxon^the
brain through some unknown method,
the
brain
similar
y
yrnnrprnpd are
cause
a
reactipn
in
the
metal,
and
even
if the people concerned are
completely unaware of the
object involved,
because they
are consciously
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
_
t.tW'A.Khhiakjm»«kn •»-•'.>.**««««««»*
" "* -•>~"-««
-
-
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
LN465-92
Even
so,
we still realize that the things we are discussing here are
easily accomplished by magical tricks.
We
also
know
that
we
are not
experts on
magic.
Therefore,
if
any intention
of trickery existed,
we,
like everyone
else,
would be
easily
duped.
t“
ck
number
of
opinions
which
stress
the possibility that this
is a tncL
Therefore,
there are often
people who
propose having
a ski lie
g
assist
in the observation
to ensure there
is no possibility of tricke
y.
However,
very
naturally,
this
type
of
insurance
is
in actuality
impossible.
This
is because
every
new
sight
is
an
oddity
and
o
appears
in
a
surprising
manner.
A
gifted
magician can always take
advantage
of
it.
The tricks
are not
always the
same,
but continuously
changing and
developing.
Therefore,
at
the most
a magician will say he
does not know how to do
the
trick
to
do
an
entirely
visible effect.
Naturally
if
several
recognized
skilled
magicians
were
to
reach
conclusion that under certain circumstances there was no trick **
performed,
it would help produce
a judgement that accepted that paranormal
ability phenomena
are
real.
We
welcome
in
principle
this
sort of
assistance
in
reducing
the
possibility
of trickery.
How®v®^ derail
observed that magicians often harbor
a certain wariness toward the overall
intentions
of
this
sort
of
investigation which causes them to tend to
create a tense atmosphere.
In
this sort
of atmosphere,
°°
£
n f hi g
&”
ay
anything.
Actually,
if
there were
few magicians who were not this
y^
this would not allow their thoughts
to
cause
those
magicians
who were
doubters
to
believe,
because
these prejudiced
mag
J
cian®
tricks of
a complexity which exceed the ability of these special magicians
to see through.
P
It
is because of this that even though we^xscovered^hat
it was very useful
to
receive
advice
from
these
magicia
,
impossible to
make significant progress
on the resolution
of this special
question by having magicians present.
We
a^ea^_ le
J
rne^^Hl^
hl
aaJ°fal iy
consultation
to
carefully
examine
the
identified
study the process from the time
it reaches the hands
of the
J.
tested until the material begins to bend.
We are familiar with the^effeet
of slight movements of
a persons
hair,
we
are
awar
,
t
effects
on
metals
of
mercury
salts
in alcohol and we know that metal
llttenl by being bent back and forth.
We know
that there
are eo.e real
difficulties
existing
in
answering
the
criticism
of
lo°king
doubts
possibilities
of trickery.
We also know that certain fairly strong doubts
are appropriate
on this
point
as
they are
about some a^
cl
f®'
be
scientific world does not
first react
in this
manner,
then
it would be
inappropriate.
However,
we believe our research can adapt to tnis.
In
some
experiments,
the
conditions
must
be
controlled
so the
possibility of trickery
is very
slight.
This
point
is
very cru
•
Metal bending
experiments are especially suited to this type
Although as of now we have only been successful m using
f
o?e
up
in
a plastic bag,
but this type
of material can play an important role.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
A«'-a*4-r*+*-
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2
LN465-92
H
r
i
that
if
similar
work
continues,
similar
examples will
We
feel
that
if
d
btedly
there
will
be
new
advances
.
continue
to
pile
up,
an
DOssible to illustrate
or explain the new
Furthermore,
it
will
not
be
possible
we feel
that we have
advances using current
laws op
'
ss while
adhering to continued and
already made
a fair
f
W e h^pe that even more experiments will be
further research m this area.
W
J
they wiH be reported,
conducted and that when there are successes tney wii
It
is
not easy
to tell
exaetly where
the line
is where scientists
must stop and become magicians
Every scientist nust
. ash
*°
nt^e?epaSy
truth about paranormal abili y P
Question
is
how
to
do this
and seeing through solid
objects).
f
^ple who claim that the unique
•Insive^chmracter I^aSncrsa££luS
^a -iier^the
about these type of thmg
is satisfied,
i ™Ltion
we
‘w. say that
if the
coats?
»h
?
n beginning
to “f”
aB^%S"no„na
’ cannot be
an appropriate
answer
is affirmative,
tnen tne
eiu=»
f
take
the quark as
an
scientific subject
.
Prow
this view
point
if
we take^ ^
^
example,
it will exceed
the scope
continuous interval existence.
It
is
not^'easy'to ' tell^xact ly^uhero the line
is where scientists must
stop and
become magicians-
However,
the properties
of any
event at
This
is the repeatability that
r®
only
allows for the extremely
individual
different
research
^d
most
important,
it
sympathetic properties
of
scientific
concerned.
It
is only at
permits even
more thorough resa£*®h
begin
to
view
this
event with
this time that
it will /b ®
P°ff lb^e ^fePt!ve ar£ modelling processes may
be^conducted^ne StS"!JSSi -almost at the same time.
On this point,
th®
th®
P ® a
seei
to
y
signify
a
differen^thingshto different
be clarified,
because they
seem to
Imagine an event
like
a
people.
They are used
in the following ®®^^S
occ^^ number of times
small child
bending a spoon,
which ha® air ®a^T,
-
tested,
the bending
under certain conditions.
Ea®£
’ j£“®
l aajo^factor under conditions of
phenomenon may
not occur.
Perhaps some major xa
t .
if the
which no one
is aware have
cha"g®^h^°®
d
"®
ions) occur
in a small amount
spoon bending phenomenon
(or any other conditio
'nvinced people
that the
of the tests and the large number of
? IL same rate,
paranormal ability
phenomenon wil
co
repeatable
One
of the
then the paranormal ability even can be viewed as repeatable.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10
: CIA-RDP96-00792R00030001 0002-2