datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001 -4 III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Summary In FY 1989 three groups ranging in size from 26 to 125 were screened at the first or group stage for a total of 256 individuals. Of that number eight showed qualitative evidence of ability to report target-related material. B. First-Stage Results Table 3 shows the results of first-stage screening. A total of 256 individuals participated in three separate screening sessions at SRI International. The first session was open to members and guests of a university alumni group. Twenty-six individuals participated in that session and none were selected to participate in second-stage screening. The second session involved members and guests of a San Francisco Bay Area social/cultural club; 105 persons submitted responses. Seven of these were selected for individualized testing. The third and final session was open to members and © guests of another university alumni group; 125 persons participated in the four-trial series. Qualitative judging produced one person who was selected for second-stage screening. Table 3 Results of First Stage Screening # of Participants # Selected for Stage II ' 1. Peninsula Stanford 26 0 Club 105 7 125 1 Qualitatively, the San Francisco Mensa organization appears to be a better population for 2. San Francisco Mensa 13. Stanford Alumni Club of Palo Alto screening for remote viewers, because seven individuals met the a priori criteria for inclusion in the second-stage screening, and only none or one did from the other two groups, respectively. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001 -4
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001 -4 A different view of this same data is shown in Figure 1 as the distribution of scores for each four-trial series for each group. For example, 26% and 35% of the Mensa responses achieved scores of 1 and 2, respectively. For the Peninsula and Palo Alto Stanford group, the percentages are 48 and 29, and 33 and 17, respectively. Quantitatively, the means of the distributions differ slightly (see Table 4). However, two-sample t-tests show significant differences between all pairs of means of the three groups. Table 5 shows the t-test statistics including the effect size for the pairs. Percent Responses 01234567 Rating Figure 1. Distribution of Scores for (a) Peninsula Stanford Club (b) San Francisco Mensa (c) Stanford Alumni of Palo Alto Table 4 Parameters of the Scoring Distributions Statistic Peninsula Stanford] San Francisco | Stanford Alumni Club Club Mensa of Palo Alto Number of 104 412 479 Viewings* Mean Score 1.490 1.735 1.044 Standard Deviation 0.878 1.129 1.079 ——_— * Not all participants submitted responses for all trials; therefore, the number of viewings does not equal four times the number of participants. 10 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001 -4
MAR 24
'94 05 -'40
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002700050005-3
P. 1
MGRBT
SGI J
mUKl MO.
$4
OASa Of tKWBCT
- 330-
*s an valuation form fog
coatpiete this fomn
a ht*. return to
and support Activity
,
preset you reviewed.
Ple*ia<H
Chief,
Tacautelogy AsEeasKent
A*
la the infomatiou aeeuratoS
{Circle response}
CBteaori**
Source
Source
Source
Vos
{true}
&
<D
E
£
FkATtU-O-f
fl)
Cl)
&)
raj
Cw5
FoeeiMy true
P)
f3)
NO
<*)
(45
{*)
Bo-aaiifiy not true
C*J
f B>
(9)
3Jo«ure
«*)
£ fil
£«S)
sfiaat ia value of the Source faj
*
iofornetion?
{circle rseponsa)
Major significance
CD
(1J
ft)
High value
(35
<SJ
(2)
Of value
<W
<5D
Lw value
<41
£4)
Ho value
(5)
(»>
(9)
WUC1ABBIMTO VHTUN BZdUtt
sor
S&cssx
RBiHASASCiE WS
MaVKaUMb
&w*a$ m:mm3xkxxm
SIMM OATS
Eueleeure a
Approved For Release 2000/08/08
: CIA-RDP96-00789R002700050005-3
DIOjODT-S
_
RJE
MAR
17;
PG.09
AO ee mtn netfee at ine ante sone ate So a eh tt 8 Reg dete ee nae tet Re tthe Be Wh nl 9 nla gets ty eA ae a Ob bert itn ene ee Tse Sea ithe BPE aed, FOR PROG | INSTALLATION: 1. Requirements: household effects. c. Rentals: Include computer, punch charges under purchased prior to purchase. d. Communications: veimunications List each requirement. for postage (other than office boxes, postage me and teletype ecuipment. lation costs, and extra e. Purchased Eqauinom Include cost of equipmen commercially or by gover TA( HQ) Form 813 1 Oce 79 B-la JUSTIFICATION as_ stated on Activity Budget B~1 a. Travel and Transportation of Persons: USE ATTACHED FORM. b. Transportation of Things: Include such items as postage used in parcel post and _ | reimbursement to civilian personnel for movement of rentals. List each requirement. If applicable, include 8/03: CIA-RDP96-00788R001600490001-2 © fo ADCSQPS<HUMINT ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT Special Actihomace 1 or 4 MGT. CODE: AS OF DATE: 381012 7. Apr 80 RAMMED EXPENSES » UARTERLY FORECAST : ELEMENT || EXPENSES FORECAST FY 10.82 CATEGORY OF FORECAST | CODE FY 19. lat Otr 2nd OTR | 3ra grr | 4th QTR TCTAL card, reproduction machine rental agreements for equipment If applicable, include charges Parcel post) rental of post ter machines, mailing machines, Also include telephone instail- message and toll charges. ent Maintenance - Other than ADP: yoo t maintenance services performed ment maintenance activities, (Replaces MIIA Form 44, 1 Dec 74, which is obsolete.) use of this form see (For Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R0016004900@4s2om Reg 37~2:) 48”
- a ne de Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500003-8 ess bat, Tw aE, vor (ag, a : a ee . a oo pete Wash : Sr pale a Ufvret wut! fa lbe ae ee). Oy Lan pred eh we ‘badd pw yoy | WAY oped na vs flrs ee at fe Ute © few tee OrAnact < py ad ais Dnten wrt we ply 2 Meda ae ls XK by by nee ie sort $}-4 fe Ween ~ rye pst Wor - : 7 | Yue hh AVayetd aguas J we la FAr tan + ye X } . 2 etal Aviat X 2 pemicn - ¥ pole br Unncey 8S hein) Qtr Av bw dlr Ze}, t Pras ANant. ik e reac Hay-W ). 1 rte Ao gperptn 30 ) Than Phe Aww gull Loe eel x ] Whe por rae amr | poate Sf LA tea Uh hae & G 5K ia haw Svtw thren ae ned he seas aE NRE A IRE Et en Sits Juouie 4a- 5048 )Sins] 6193 A . 7 : ._ ? io : : ' ‘ t ben vartihean © “Mads 4 ie ALM Aa ieee ee Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500003-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001-4 Table 5 Two-Sample t-Test Results Mensa/Peninsula | Mensa/Palo Alto} Peninsula/Palo Alto Two Sample t 2.061 9.337 3.947 889 5.0 x 10° 0.299 Degrees of Freedom p-Value Effect Size As measured by the effect size, the only “meaningful” comparison is between San Francisco Mensa with the Stanford Alumni Club of Palo Alto. It is premature to conclude, however, that something exists within Mensa that predisposes its members toward possessing remote viewing ability, There are a number of problems that prevent such a conclusion. First of all, the analyst was not blind to the groups, and thus could distort the scoring. Even if the analyst were blind, however, such a conclusions would still be unwarranted, because of the lack of statistical independence among the subjects. Additional circumstantial evidence in favor of Mensa would be realized if the seven individuals chosen for the second-stage screening continue to demonstrate high—quality remote viewing ability. Cc. Second-Stage Results Although there were a total of eight persons from the first-stage screening who showed qualitative evidence of potential exceptional remote viewing abilities, none participated in second-stage screening in FY 1989 becasue of timing and/or availability. These eight individuals will be invited to participate in invidualized second-stage screenings as part of the FY 1990 screening work. In accordance with the FY 1989 Statement of Work—Task 6.0.5, we asked a long-time remote viewer who has produced quality results in dream and Ganzfeld studies conducted at Maimonides Medical Center in the Division of Parapsychology (1972-1978), to participate in a second-stage screening. Table 7 shows the target and the rank assignments for each of Viewer 389’s eight trials. The resulting sum of ranks was 11 (p < 0.0025, effect size= 1.01). A 715% hitting rate (6 of 8 first-place matches) where the mean expectation is 25% is the best we have obtained for any of our second-stage screenings during the past two years. Viewer 389 has joined our research program and is currently participating in one experiment. 11 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200580001 -4
phe 1600500003-8 pPogloo7zesR00 @ = ba | 7d c a4 ' Oo © => |= @ CIA-R 2 Approved For Release 2001/04/02 "PROGRAM ELEMENT 385128 QUARTER 2 - FY 84. 2. NEARY | eee ce oe ee eee ed AVAILABLIITY "CATEGORY OF TVL COST . DQ: | ; No. & Cat of Pers| Total No, of “ |Mode of |'. Yes or No 9): (Listing Attached)| To be computed bx... » ' TO OFF/ENL/CIV’ | Days ea. Pers |Travel | s. |- DCSEM_(FGGM cm , San. francisco, | CA Operational Act a ak New a tgrk, NY perenne Tg: vas fA S06 fe uachuca , 5, So Pypsee Se. RH San Francisco, CAS 1/0/0 : Joe Se 7S7 3s" = 266 : Mf, OF ¢ ' Rosslyn, VA —O =
ae) ©. ~B a =: AVAILABLIITY CATEGORY OF TVL COST 8 = Mode of J. Yes or Noy) (Listing Attached)|_ To be computed bx: COFROM Travel | Govt Qtrs/Mess * >. os po ho : GCM ~~ San Francisco 8) i B. os re tD- 440. tenth o> a0 2 Operational Act GM - achuca, AZ? EE xX Go..eeee a Bro "Y :  lOperational Act. eo ‘Go OMe | ee si oa : errs rret “Chic go, IL a GO ane ~San Francisco, | o 736 : < ' O : N 2 eo ooMN = ‘ at roo} oO N —_ cc) ”.. © Oo. (0) ; a Som fe) re zor co) > . 3 : Smt a2. = '
rt a3 c rd ie) Cc oO © -R0788RQ01600500003 CIA:RDP96 oO ep) 228 Approved For Release 2001/04/02 IT 13 ane at seeiel + kee _ PROGRAM ELEMENT p 385128” 03-8 QUARTER 4. ~ FY 84 cay 2 t “CATEGORY OF TVL = cost. (Listing Attached) To be computed | “DCSRM_(FGGM) ~ cP) AVATLABLITTY Mode of |. Yes or No Travel. | Govt Qtrs/Mess San Francisco, CA. Operational Act. Chicago, IL S -06788R00 2 ola Operational Tng. Ft Huachuca, Ao a EE San Francisco:
: a) ~@ . (TINE: ARY. wo). £ “ = - . - FGGR San Francsico, se 7 FGCRR - ‘New York, NY a Foch: Chicago, IL Q FOG CIA- Approved For Release 2001/04/02 et Huachuca, AZ OFF E Davs ea. at of Pers Total No. of NL/CIV_ Pers Govt Qtrs/Mess” -AVATLABLIITY. Yes or No Operational Act - Operational Act
ee : Oy Pe 2 AVATLABLITTY | No! & Cat of Pers}Total No. of |Mode of |. Yes or No.” : Days_ea. Pers | Travel Govt Qtrs/Mess IT [NEARY San Francisco, CA YYI6 A446 76d a6. (&e. 206 reo Se Operational Act New York, NY Operational Trg 16 Mo eg Ga Conference oe 360. 700 ve perc 66 S40 joe ‘Se Contract Aetin | CIA Approved For Release 2001/04/02 ru ewe tant wee mae
"PROGRAM ELEMENT 385128 °?. TRAVEL AND. TRAN 28 ‘ake: fe on : : . ; Ds ao : : -<. QUARTER 3 - FY 85~_ oe anit CATEGORY OF TVL. (Listing Attached) SPEC CONVEYANCE “No. & Cat of Pers Total No. of OFF/ENL/CIV | 60050000 Yes or No. Days ea. Pers | Travel Govt _Qtrs/Mess or San Francisco, CA“ Operational Act. Ft Huachuca, .AZ a - ane Operational Act. ¥ _ Conferenc eo. ye St eane ee rat Approved For Release 2001 104/02
a 1 q ‘PAGES. OF 4% 7 ‘ 1 3 “PROGRAM ELEMENT 385128 9 D sae fe Bee a VR OR CATEGORY OF TVL = COST iy 2 Ss “No. & Cat of Pers} Total No. of: » Yes or Nov, (Listing Attached)]. To be compute bx. ’ (OFRON ; OFF/ENL/CIV= ~ | Days ea. Pers Govt Qtrs/Mess:” |‘ __ : 40 ° ae te 2 lat 0 ©) = San Francisco 72GYO-14¢ Ft Huachuca, . 0 Chicago, IL Vo” «San Francisco, co 788 Operational Act ¥ ge 8 078 q@ = Le Operational Act... O --s: 9 CIA 04/04/02 Approved For Release 20
'
'i -
,
>
=
’,i
:v
• v
;
7»\
-VZ*
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: ^IA-^D^6-J^7Qj3RQjOi'60O5OpOO3-a
. 0^
: o
O
o
o
o
T»
X)
o
TJ
TJ
TJ
, CP _
to
CO
CD
CD
’
•ft
-ft
:
,
f)
•+
»*j
CO
.!j
CD
„,
CD
(B
0)
CD
ft-
rf
rf
rf
rf
- h«'C; H* v* CD
.
H* Rv H*
p.
§ -$? 3
\R.3-';
;%**> Q
*.
o
!i- 3
o
• 3
'
O
z»
CD
0)
0)
0)
CD
h->
<;,;
ii'Si
•
% b->
I—
>1; >
t >
—
>
o
o
o
o
rf
rf
IQ
'.rf
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96
500003-8
500003-8
o
o
o
o
O
•o j
. T>
o
"D
•o
flu
fO
re
re
i Z %
-t)
hi
0)
;
0)
CD
0)
0)
rf
:
rf
•1
rf
n-
, O
,
H*
H-
o
O
o
O
’ 3
O
, 3
0)
....
0)
re
.
CD
re
M £
. M
;
h-*
h-*
_ M
>
>
o
n
o
o
rf
rf
rf
rf
Approved For Release 2001/04/0^,eiA^bl^-^7^Rq(^1600500003^
1«|
.. 3
-r.t4r
*.?*-.
•
-
--V.
•
>*
. ?
'
'
,-T^
*
-
-
T,
'
”•
•
Hk$yC& lb
0160050000
Approved For Release 2001/04(1
*••
’
•
"'V
s
-'..
*l* f-Sr.r
v
•
’JS|*
wib
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CI/gR[|f96^0|68Rp01 600500003-8
V
t
.3
3'' ..3
£
V-.
''vi
:
Approved For Release 200,1/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500003-8
,'V
r
-
..
i
.
o /
^fVX/VK4,
cL
1 "
I v/
VtrjL,
'
r-~
X
. |
. j
(A ^
]
rV.'-rvv-v pt-
*Sof^
$> it
in\t
>30 \L
({/«. '4
;-'
,
jjJ\S
^
'j
, ^
\
jtLlMtL
'Tv/v.-vC
CvvlSvi
.
^ajrc
L?
{/ j
\o®. vX
iv
i
^
}
>
«
/V
* /f
^ *s£n‘-
t s
l ' f)x >
'
'
-
(. S ^
i,» )Ai’
-
'-s(^<j){'u
U>^'.
>5* K
(tu.JLJ/v
titr)
i
Cov%4W/4
S*
!<L
Kwai
| f|V
^ ^ /
~g*>TZ
£t> 1
;
‘"""•^
(
c, cu,
)
xt.
(.3>S') /2-
^
; ,'^1C
[tlxjCtA
IffcvU
\ £
W ^vt^-vW
',
J {i)£-
jjA^vU/l^'' J®/'-
i
,
.-..
7 *'!>!<-
^ v
a-.
’•''.
:
.,
yyC^i
"
-
V P
v
4.(X
'A
j
,
A
'y^\
A
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDPa6-00788R001 600500003-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R00270005001 1-6 SGIA ac “a . at - ot" Canberra, — fede Lr pom wh % Com «SECRET ; NOFORN GATE SENDS sketch 3f Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R00270005001 1-6
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-
IA-F
It /u&>
\
S(?X
01600500003-8
OTft&S
£CA
'I'ivo
pectte
6P*
l
OC
,
Met / £ 9/0
SMCoi
Ific
Uoo&CAS
Ao, 060
150,000
& /S, ooo
lOv
SfiUKjj#!
1 So,OQ&
Oto&oG’
ur
- k\k
ifu>/4
C\u
rtM
,
Scuj fy
3 /{
5^
7J
f
jM 'WIV(f
CM
SQfl/Zcl)
SL^
jo-e
CPU
WlOlAL
smas
$ rft^ W
*rt Object
Qot%r/rk^g/jQ.
$ too COO
O COa
<%><0
so, 000
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500003-8
AL cae Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500004-7 IAGPA-F ~SD FY 84/85 COP Unfinanced Requirements DCSRA CL Project Manager 27 April 1983 ATTN: Ms Brower LTC Jachim/ned/7829 FGOM Attached is a completed Schedule 104 (OMA) to support project CENTER LANE unfinanced requirements, J ‘1 Incl ROBERT J. JACHIM as | LTC, MI CENTER LANE Project Manager Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500004-7
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500004-7
IAGPA-F-SD
FY 84/85 COB Unfinonced Requirements
DCSRH
CL. Project Manager
27 April 1983
ATTN:
Ms Brower
LTC Jachim/ncd/7829
FGCH
Attached is
a completed Schedule
104
(0MA)
to support project CENTER LANE unfinanced
requirements.
Incl
as
ROBERT
J.
JACHIM
LTC,
MI
CENTER LANE Project Manager
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500004-7
Approved For Release 2007/0 4/A ii(clar REN RMPMBBROO 1600500005-6 Scheaule Lu4- OM - (¢ in Thousands) _3 COMMAND/ AGENCY COMMAND/AGENCY CODE APPROPRIATION PRIORITY ee 925 OMA FY’ 84 a USAINSCOM TITLE | COMMAND SUBPROGRAM COMMAND — | SUBPROGRA 1. Is the UFR a new requirement resulting from HQDA or higher authority tasking? If yes, give details in paragraph 5 below. 2... Is this UFR for supplies? NO If yes, what dollar value will be purchased from The Stock Fund? 3. Does this UFR impact on Anny Management Headquarters activities? \o If so, identity the area affected by UIC and civilian/military identities. 4 Unfinanced Resource Requirement: a. EOE/Manpower MANPOWER DATA OFF/WO/ b. PE DISTRIBUTION ; ‘FY 1984 ry 1985 198 5* 34.6 206.3 - 385128 2 * Assuming FY 84 UFR not financed, if applicable. NOTE: ‘TDY UFRs must include an analysis listing eacl individual trip. 5, Justification of UFR (include Impact Statement; attach continuation sheet as required). See attached continuation sheet. Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500005-6
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500005-6 5. a. COMM MAINT: JUSTIFICATION - Required maintenance on currently installed word processing equipment. (FY 83 maintenance in original purchase.) IMPACT: Unacceptable risk to equipment. b. UTIL RENT: JUSTIFICATION - Additional word processing terminal, to support new DA operational tasking. IMPACT - Unable to support additional tasking. c. OTHER PUR SVC: JUSTIFICATION - Civilian contracts which provide for contractor's special support to operational activities and support to new DA operational tasking. IMPACT - Degradation of current capability; no ability to support additional tasking. d. TVL PERS: JUSTIFICATION ~- Support new operational tasking from DA and work with civilian contractors providing special support to opérational activities. IMPACT - Degradation of current capability, no ability to support additional tasking. Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500005-6
Approved For Release
Schedule iul-
Q*v\
CENTER LANE
is
the UFR a new requirement resulting from I1QDA or higher authority tasking?
If yes, give details in paragraph 5 below.
2.
Is this UFR for supplies?
NO
If yes, what dollar value will be purchased from The Stock Fund?
3.
Does this UFR impact on Army Mmagcment Headquarters activities?
N0_ If so,
identify the area
identities.
4.
Unfinanced Resource Requirement:
a.
EOE/Manpower
affected by UIC and civilian/military
FY
TOTAL
CIV
PERS
m
PERS
TRANS
THINGS
UTIL
RENTS caw PRINT
REPRO
EQUIP
MAINE, aniER
PUR SVC
POL
OTHER
SUPPLY
EQUIP
01JIER
Tvp
•
MANPOWER DM A
ES/FTP/MY
'
j off/no/
ACFT
SHIP
COM4
85*
•
• 234.6
206.3
35.7
29.6
2.9
3.7
.2
.2
8.4
9.2
233.6
208.8
4.0
•
5.6
3.6
3.0
J
b.
PE DISTRIBUTION
PE
385128
PE
FY 198^
234.6
FY 1985
206.3
FY 198 5*
* Assigning FY 84 UFR not financed, if applicable.
,
,
,
;
«
NOTF*
TOY UFRs must include an analysis listug
.
Justification of UFR (include Impact Statement; attach continuation sheet as requireJ;
~
individuai trip.
See attached continuation
sheet.
Approved For Release -2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001600500005-6
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500005-6
5.
a.
COMM MAINT:
JUSTIFICATION
- Required maintenance on currently installed word processing
equipment.
(FY
83 maintenance
in
original purchase.)
IMPACT:
Unacceptable risk
to equipment.
b.
UTIL RENT:
JUSTIFICATION
- Additional word processing terminal,
to support
new DA operational
tasking.
IMPACT
- Unable
to support additional
tasking.
c.
OTHER PUR SVC:
JUSTIFICATION
- Civilian contracts which provide
for
contractor's
special
support
to operational activities
and support
to new DA operational
tasking.
IMPACT
- Degradation
of current capability;
no ability to support additional
tasking.
d.
TVL PERS:
JUSTIFICATION
- Support new operational
tasking
from DA
and work
with civilian contractors providing
special
support
to operational activities.
IMPACT
- Degradation
of current capability,
no ability
to support additional
tasking.
Approved For Release 2001/04/02
: CIA-RDP96-00788R001 600500005-6
TALKW6 oApeR —PROVIOLO lo =—CG FOR Use ye . tacpa-r-ApProvesh For Release 2000/08/08 : GM-RPIb{06788R001800510001-8C 0+ 2 MAN. He Ray dy LTC Buzby/7829 4 May 1984 1. (U) PURPOSE: To provide an overview of CENTER LANE, 2. (U) RECOMMENDED POSITION: That CENTER LANE operations, training, and development continue within the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. 3. (U) POINTS SUPPORTING RECOMMENDED POSITION: a. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Since October 1978, when ACSI (then MG Thompson) tasked INSCOM (o develop a parapsychology program (then GRILL FLAME), INSCOM has through strictly controlled, thoroughly documented, and carefully monitored training, operations, and development established the feasibility and soundness of the remote viewing phenomenon as an intelligence collection tool. Without continuation, this crucial momentum would be lost. b. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Since May 1981, when I assumed command of INSCOM, the project (now CENTER LANE) has provided the U.S. Army and such agencies as DIA, CIA, NSA, FBI, and the Secret Service critical intelligence unavailable from other sources. Witheut continuation, the Intelligence Community would lose a valuable collection capability which now allows penetration of intelligence targets inaccessible to any conventional system, ce. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Continuing work in the academic and R&D communities has refined the methodology-, demonstrating far greater accuracy, control, and reliability than ever before, Without continuation, CENTER LANE would be kept from realizing its true potential. d. (S-CL-2/NOFORN) A current collection project is focused on providing information to the CIA in their efforts to locate William F. Buckley who was kidnapped from Beirut on 16 March 1984, An SOI on that project is attached as Inclosure 1, At Tuclosure 2 is an MFR from the CIA commenting on the value of CENTER LANE, 4, (U) OTHER VIEWS: a. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) “The phenomenon is not real." This argument simply does not stand up in the face of many valid scientific replications conducted by reputable institutions such as Princeton University, Maimonidies Medical Center, Bell Laboratories, and McDonnell Douglas Corporation and SRI-International, among others, In addition, a congressionally directed independent scientific review panel concluded in October 1983, "The evidence shown to us is too impressive to dismiss as mere coincidence." b. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) “The phenomenon is not well understood and therefore has no practical value.” The users of intelligence produced by CENTER LANE feel that it does liave value, c. (S/CL~2/NOFORN) “The phenomenon is the work of the devil and should not be exploited.” This is an emotional statement that critics and skeptics of the CENTER LANE Project occasionally use because they do not accept an explanation of the phenomenon. WANING NOTICE: CEATLR LAM. SPLOEAL ACER SS peecian RESTRICT DISSEMINATE CS Ta THOSt wld vie dE Gh ACT SS TU CATEGORY THREE (3) SONSETIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS TAVOt VO Approved For Release 2000/08/08 ': ‘CiA-RBP$6“00788R00160051000179) ffi: 3 INSCUOM